Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ahti-veikko.pietarinen@helsinki.fi
Professor, University of Helsinki
Department of Philosophy, History, Culture, and Art Studies
Wuhan Daxue
April 2011
In this mini-course of ten lectures, I will go through some of the basic principles that
characterize analytic philosophy in the western philosophical tradition. First we introduce the
key notions of analytic philosophy. Then we discuss the nature of arguments and issues in
philosophy of science. The last two lectures are practical in their orientation and address the
matters of writing and publishing research papers in philosophy, concluding with some
thoughts on the profession of academic philosophy.
Finland Factbook:
Population: 5.223.442
Languages:
Finnish 92% (official)
Swedish 5.6% (official)
Independence since
1917. Previously a
Grand Duchy in the
Russian Empire for 108
years, and a part of
Sweden for 600 years
before that.
188.000 lakes; 98.000
islands.
Beer drank by Finns /
year 404.193.000 litres.
Cultural Essays:
1989
2006
The Nobel Prize in Philosophy
Essential Analytic Philosophy
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
Wuhan Daxue, 25 April 2011
In this lecture, I look into the characteristic features of the mainstream western
philosophy, commonly known as analytic philosophy. What is it? What are its
methods? What distinguishes it from other areas of philosophy, such as continental
philosophy? How was it born? What is the situation in the contemporary scenery of
analytic philosophy?
10
Theoretical
Language
Mind
Logic
Mathematics
M&E
Philosophy of Science
Phenomenology
Pragmatism
Existentialism
Metaethics
Metaphilosophy
Hermeneutics
Continental
Analytic
Aesthetics
Political philosophy
Ethics
Structuralism
Feminism
Applied ethics
Experimental
philosophy
Practical
Essential Analytic Philosophy
11
Theoretical
Austin, Kripke
Davidson, Searle
Russell
Frege, Dummett
M&E
Carnap, Quine, Hintikka
Husserl
Peirce, Putnam
Heidegger
Metaethics
Metaphilosophy
Habermas
Continental
Analytic
Aesthetics
Rawls
Ethics
Derrida
Kristeva
Applied ethics
Experimental
philosophy
Practical
Essential Analytic Philosophy
12
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
13
Regressive analysis
Aristotle, Euclid: start with the proposition and try to find the
first causes or principles that demonstrate the proposition
14
1.
2.
15
cogency of arguments
To take the role model to be a scientist
To rely discoveries on experiments, observations and insights
To leave no room for literary philosophy: use plain language, together
with technical terms that are well defined.
16
History of Philosophy
History matters: No one can think in a vacuum
But not to study history only for its own sake
Problems and questions define the subject matter, not what
17
18
19
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
ahti-veikko.pietarinen@helsinki.fi
Professor, University of Helsinki
Department of Philosophy, History, Culture, and Art Studies
Wuhan Daxue
April 2011
Reading: Michael Beaney, Analysis, 2009.
This lecture takes a look at the notion of analysis. We observe some developments
in analytic philosophy variously found in the works of Frege, Russell, Carnap,
Quine, Donald Davidson, J.L. Austin and Paul Grice, for example.
21
Rejection of foundationalism
Wittgenstein...
22
So what remains?
New philosophies of science have emerged
Cognitive Science & AI; Biology; Economics; Law;...
Russell,Quine,...)
Avoid excess naturalism; leave some room for metaphysics
Back to a renewed kind of conceptual analysis
New logics, new tools, new methods
Study of semantics and pragmatics
23
Regressive analysis
2.
Aristotle, Euclid: start with the proposition and try to find the
first principles that demonstrate the proposition
Pythagorass Theorem
Essential Analytic Philosophy
24
25
Frege:
Russell:
1.
2.
3.
Wittgenstein:
26
Rudolf Carnap:
Quasi-analysis: dont seek anything more fundamental by
decomposition, but give a specific relation between concepts that
then defines or constructs things (abstraction)
f (a) f (b) if and only if R (a ,b ).
For example:
The number of as = The number of bs iff there are just as many as as bs.
The direction of a = The direction of b iff a is parallel to b.
27
Sir Michael Dummett: The only route to the analysis of thought goes through
the analysis of language. (1993) (A strong claim...)
Linguistic Philosophy (Ryle, Davidson, Chomsky, Austin, Strawson, Searle, Grice...)
Language before thought?
28
29
exactly synonymous to the analysandum, but which are exact, fruitful and
simple, and serve the cognitive purposes equally well (or sufficiently
equally well) as the original does.
Essential Analytic Philosophy
30
Study of meaning
Emphasis on linguistic meaning
Importance of methods
Some understanding of the method of analysis
Importance of arguments and reasoning
Importance of knowing what goes on in science
Analytic philosophy, then, is a broad...movement in which
various conceptions of analysis compete and pull in different
directions. Reductive and connective, revisionary and
descriptive, linguistic and psychological, formal and empirical
elements all coexist in creative tension, [which] is the great
strength of the analytic tradition. (Beaney 2009)
Essential Analytic Philosophy
31
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
ahti-veikko.pietarinen@helsinki.fi
Professor, University of Helsinki
Department of Philosophy, History, Culture, and Art Studies
Wuhan Daxue
27.4.2011
Reading: http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/fallacies.html
Fisher: The Logic of Real Arguments.
Plato:
SOCRATES: Is it not true that p?
GLAUCON: I agree.
CEPHALUS: It would seem so.
POLEMARCHUS: Necessarily.
THRASYMACHUS: Yes, Socrates.
ALCIBIADES: Certainly, Socrates.
PAUSANIAS: Quite so, if we are to be consistent.
ARISTOPHANES: Assuredly.
ERYXIMACHUS: The argument certainly points that way.
PHAEDO: By all means.
PHAEDRUS: What you say is true, Socrates.
Essential Analytic Philosophy
33
1.
Suppose (as Aristotle believed) that the heavier a body is, the
faster it falls to the ground and suppose we have two bodies, a
heavy one called M and a light one called m. Under our initial
assumption M will fall faster than m. Now suppose that M and
m are joined together thus M+m. Now what happens? Well
M+m is heavier than M so by our initial assumption it should
fall faster than M alone. But in the joined body M+m, m and M
will each tend to fall just as fast as before they were joined, so
m will act as a brake on M and M+m will fall slower than M
alone. Hence it follows from our initial assumption that M+m
will fall both faster and slower than M alone. Since this is
absurd our initial assumption must be false.
Essential Analytic Philosophy
34
2.
1.
2.
35
36
Is this an argument?
37
Is this an argument?
Yes: Premisses: If... and the money supply... Conclusion:
inflation will not come down.
Is this a good argument?
38
Is this an argument?
Yes: Premisses: If... and the money supply... Conclusion:
inflation will not come down.
Is this a good argument?
No: This reasoning does not establish its conclusion: the
reasons could both be true and the conclusion false. Why?
Essential Analytic Philosophy
39
Is this an argument?
It seems: Premisses: If...down and the money supply...10%
Conclusion: inflation will not come down.
Is this a good argument?
No: This reasoning does not establish its conclusion: the
reasons could both be true and the conclusion false. Why?
Something else could bring inflation down, for example a fall
in the price of imports.
So there is an error in the argumentation (it is not sound).
Essential Analytic Philosophy
40
41
http://consc.net/misc/proofs.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4yBvvGi_2A
http://inquiry.mcdaniel.edu/videos/CrossfireIntelligentDesign.swf
http://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~jim/worst.html
Essential Analytic Philosophy
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
ahti-veikko.pietarinen@helsinki.fi
Professor, University of Helsinki
Department of Philosophy, History, Culture, and Art Studies
Wuhan Daxue
28.4.2011
Epistemology of Science:
Metaphysics of Science:
50
test:
If tests prove negative, theory is falsified
If tests fit the theory, continue to uphold it as undefeated.
51
1.
52
2.
Yes: Bayesianism
Pr( H / E ) Pr(H )
(Bayes Formula)
Pr( E )
No: Induction is a natural form of reasoning (see the next slide).
Amounts to rational belief revision
53
1.
2.
3.
Deduction:
M is P
S is M
S is (necessarily) P
Induction:
S1, S2, S3,... are M
S1, S2, S3,... are P
Any M is (probably) P
Abduction:
M is P1, P2, P3,...
S is P1, P2, P3,...
S is (plausibly) M
54
55
1.
2.
Scientists postulate all kinds of things but need not believe in them.
56
57
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
ahti-veikko.pietarinen@helsinki.fi
Professor, University of Helsinki
Department of Philosophy, History, Culture, and Art Studies
Wuhan Daxue
29.4.2011
Readings: http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/philosophy.html.
Shatz, D. (2004). Peer Review and the Marketplace of Ideas, in Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry.
In these last two lectures, we look inside the academic profession of philosophy in the
Western tradition. The first lecture focuses on how to write and publish papers in
philosophical journals. What do the editors and reviewers expect of a submission? How
does the peer review work? What was the Sokal Affair? How to find the right journal? What
is the todays publication scene in philosophy?
4.
59
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
60
61
62
63
Slow
Doesnt keep up well with
technology & the increase in
information
Errors (even frauds) may
undergo undetected
Affiliation bias
Referee/Editorial bias
Heavily cited and famous papers
may have been originally rejected
64
Probably not:
65
practices, but to defend the standards of scientific & philosophical work from
the threats of those postmodern literary intellectuals pontificating on science
and its philosophy and making a complete bungle of both.
66
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
67
And the
winner is...
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
ahti-veikko.pietarinen@helsinki.fi
Professor, University of Helsinki
Department of Philosophy, History, Culture, and Art Studies
Wuhan Daxue
29.4.2011
This last lecture presents some thoughts on the status of philosophy in present-day
academia. Questions to be taken up include: What is the difference between being a
philosopher and being a philosophy professor? What is the real work professors get to do at
the universities? What is the relationship to other disciplines? Is philosophy science,
humanities, or neither? What is the contribution academic philosophy has to the society?
Where is philosophy now and where is it going?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
70
Never let
facts get in
the way of
arguments
- Gorgias
He was a
wise man
who invented
beer
- Plato
The former may be less expert but widely attuned to by the society
(politicians, businessmen, artists,...)
But is that philosophy? They are often the Sophists, opponents of Plato
What does this mean? Universities have always been in the society
Universities dont teach public intellectuanism, nor do they should
So how to carry out the Third Mission?
YES: Learn how to explain complex issues: Write general science, textbooks; Give
71
and
degrade the
mind
- Aristotle
72
73
74
1.
Disintrestedness
Autonomy of the HE institution
1.
Specialization
2.
2.
1.
2.
75
Is it Science or Humanities?
Philosophy: the closest thing to science, but it is using
76
Internal dispersion?
2.
77
2.
78
1. Searle, John (2003). Contemporary Philosophy in the United States, in The Blackwell
Companion to Philosophy (2nd Edition). Edited by Nicholas Brunnin and E.P. Tsui-James,
Blackwell, 1-22.
2. Beaney, Michael (2009). Analysis, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N.
Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/analysis/
3. A Handout on Fallacies, The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill:
http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/fallacies.html
4. Papineau, David (2003). Philosophy of Science, The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy
(2nd Edition). Edited by Nicholas Brunnin and E.P. Tsui-James, Blackwell, 286-316.
5. a. Philosophy, The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill:
http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/philosophy.html
b. Shatz, David (2004). Peer Review and the Marketplace of Ideas, in Peer Review: A
Critical Inquiry, New York: Rowman, 15-34. (Appeared in 1996 as Is Peer Review
Overrated?, Monist 79, 536-563.)
6. a. Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog: http://leiterreports.typepad.com/
b. Stanley, Jason (2010). The Crisis in Philosophy:
http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/04/05/stanley
79
Further Sources
http://leiterreports.typepad.com/
http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/04/05/stanley
http://philosophysmoker.blogspot.com/
Feibelman, P.J. 1993. A PhD Is Not Enough! A Guide to Survival in Science,
Cambridge: Mass.: Perseus Books.
Feynman, R.P. 1985. Surely Youre Joking, Mr. Feynman, Reading:
Vintage.
Fisher, Alec 2004. The Logic of Real Arguments, 2nd Edition. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Menand, Louis 2010. The Marketplace of Ideas, New York: Norton.
Smyllyan, Raymond 1978. What is the Name of This Book?, Prentice-Hall.
80
81