RTI Murder MUDA BDA

S.O.
S e - Clarion Of Dalit - Weekly Newspaper On Web

Working For The Rights & Survival Of The Oppressed
Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R VOL.11 issue.01 .11/ 01 / 2017
Why NOT demolish illegal buildings of Ministers

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/why-not-demolish-illegal-bungalows-of-ministers ,
PIL Land Mafia , Judges & RTI Activist Murder

An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India , Karnataka High Court & National Human Rights Commission
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2017
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State
.
....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others
....Respondents
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF
MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner above named.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly
hearts. They will fight among themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just
before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public
servants.
2. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed to government of karnataka authorities , MUDA , BDA , KIADB , MCC , BBMNP , etc seeking information regarding illegal
buildings , land encroachments specifically in mysore & bangalore , they didnt provide me information. Now one land scam after another are tumbling out.
3. I have given certain details to authorities including judiciary , SCI regarding land , lake encroachments in mysore when encroachment was at preliminary stage.
The authories could have stopped it , but they didn,t. Now , the hinkal lake , hebbal lake , hootagalli lake & BEML Quarters lake have been encroached to maximum
extent and criminals have made crores of rupees profit.
4. Government authorities has not given title deeds to tribals living in forest since centuries , government authorities has not given title deeds to landless people ,
dalits who are cultivating on government land since decades.
5. Government authorities , police immediately evict , take suo motto action when a poor family , nomadic family just erects a hutment on government land. The same
public servants , police dont take action when a rich crook palatial bungalow , business complex on government land , lake bed. Cannt they see it. , they can but are
hands in glove with looters.
6. even some of the judges dont take action when appeal for justice is made to them , to evict encroachers , to stop encroachment. It may be quid pro quo
arrangement with crooks. See how many judges have benefitted from government discretionary quota allotment of sites , illegal judicial layout , etc.
7. The land encroachers are not poor people below poverty line , they dont even have ability to build a pucca house. Encroachers are rich crooks , greedy individuals
with political connection. So they dont deserve compassion.
8. Now , government of karnataka is trying to legalise illegalities in buildings , land encroachments , which gives a booster dose to criminals to commit more crimes.
9. As per equitable law if present land encroachments are legalized , in future too government must legalize future land encroachments when ever it takes place.
10. Prior to enactment of AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME of government of karnataka legalizing illegal constructions , land encroachments, MUDA , BDA , MCC ,
KIADB officials evicted , demolished buildings of encroachers who didnt cough up bribes. The one who paid bribes , their encroachments , illegal buildings survived
and now getting legalized by government.
11. Now , as per equity who ever have been evicted from encroachments , whos illegal buildings demolished must get compensation from government. If not all
encroachers must be evicted & illegal buildings must be demolished.
12. Now Karnataka High Court has given green signal to AKRAMA SAKRAMA scheme of government of Karnataka , therby HC Judges are favoring land mafia ,
criminals.
13. It is the duty of the government , Police & Court to give protection to journalists , whistle blowers , RTI Activists who are unearthing truths , crimes. But all of
them have failed in their duties to protect RTI Activist Mr.Srinath of Mysuru who was brutally murdered.
14. Recently Karnataka high court gave clearance to Karnataka governments regularization of illegal buildings ( AKRAMA SAKRAMA ) scheme.
a. Law is one & same for all.
b. Government authorities , police razes down , demolishes small temporary hutments built by tribals , dalits without mercy , takes suo motto
action. No court comes to their rescue.
c. Till date bagar hukum lands are not given to dalits , tribals are not given land rights over their huts in forests. Is Cout blind , deaf ?
d. However when rich crooks build bungalows , commercial complexes illegally , no suo motto action taken by government authorizes , police ,
why ? Courts go a step further it gives stay orders against demolition of rich crooks illegal buildings , asks government to modify plan , law
itself to save illegal buildings of rich crooks.
e. Does Karnataka HC has details of exact number of building violations , buildings built on forest lands , lake beds , raja kaluves with
respective after affects on neighbouring buildings , road traffic , ecology , etc and contingency plan by authorities to overcome those after
affects casewise backed by technical studies. Make it public.
f. What criminal action initiated against revenue , police & other officials who failed in their duties at the first instance to stop the illegal
building construction.
g. Small houses of poor people who have smaller building violations but who failed to bribe officials were dealt mercilessly. Their houses
were razed down . Now , will the HC order the government to compensate them , to rebuild houses for them as the court is now saying they are
legal now.
h. Government & HC has given a cut off date for consideration of regularization of illegal buildings. When a crime before that cut off date
becomes legal , why cannt it be legal after that date ?
i. What guarantee HC gives no illegal buildings has come up after cut off date and will never come in future ?
j. If comes what criminal action against the concerned officials ?
Bottomline : Judges open your eyes , listen , think & then act.
2. Question(s) of Law:
Is robbing anothers property right , legal ? is robbing land , lake a public property for private , individual use right ?
Is it NOT the duty of Police , Court & Government to protect Rights , Lives of Journalists , Whistle Blowers , RTI Activists and their family ?
Why they failed to protect the life of Mysuru RTI Activist Mr. Srinath ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of land grabbing ,frauds and related crimes.
4. Averment:
Covering up Land Frauds & Land Mafia . Please read details at :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-first-appeal---muda-bda-kiadb ,
Karnataka High Court Judges favoring Land Mafia
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/hc-judges-favoring-mafia
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public
servants in the following cases to perform their duties , to answer the following RTI questions , to protect Rights , Lives of Journalists , Whistle Blowers , RTI
Activists , their family members and to annul Karnataka High Court order legalizing illegal buildings in Karnataka.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting
them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see
how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of
rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject
matter of the present petition.
PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public
servants , Government of Karnataka authorities in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions raised above.
b. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India for orders to concerned public servants , Government of Karnataka to answer the following RTI
questions.
c. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India for orders to concerned public servants , Government of Karnataka to protect Rights , Lives of
Journalists , Whistle Blowers , RTI Activists & their family members and to pay compensation of minimum five crore rupees to victims family from public
exchequer. Afterwards the property , money of alleged criminals & their family members must be seized , money recovered by the public exchequer / government.
d. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India for orders to government of Karnataka to apprehend , legally prosecute the criminals involved in
the recent murder of RTI Activist Mr. Srinath in Mysuru , to pay compensation of five crore rupees from public exchequer to the family of deceased and to seize
all properties of alleged criminals.
e. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India for orders to annul Karnataka High Court order legalizing illegal buildings in Karnataka and to order
all Karnataka High Court Judges to make public their & their family members full property , wealth details on sworn affidavit.
f. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India for orders to government of Karnataka officials , Revenue department officials , MUDA , BDA officials
to make public their & their family members full property , wealth details on sworn affidavit within 90 days.
g . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.
Kindly read full details at following web page :
Karnataka High Court Judges favoring Land Mafia
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/hc-judges-favoring-mafia
Dated : 01st January 2017 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India.PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
RTI ACTIVISTS MURDER : POLICE DETAIN 6 FOR QUESTIONING
RTI activist Srinath

Mysuru, Dec. 31 - Six persons have been detained for questioning in the murder of Srinath, a Mysuru-based RTI activist. They were detained this morning based on
the clues provided by Srinaths family members that the RTI activist had faced threats from the corrupt as he had exposed their illegal dealings.
The 36-year-old Srinath, a resident of Rajarajeshwarinagar in city, was murdered in Srirangapatna and his body was found yesterday below the bridge that connects
Karighatta and Ganjam. His body including face, legs and private parts bore deep injuries.
The six detained persons include an engineer whose house was recently raided by Anti Corruption Bureau in Mysuru where crores of rupees worth properties were
recovered, his driver and four others from BEML Layout who were at loggerheads with Srinath. Though the Police are tight-lipped about the detention, sources told
Star of Mysore that they are being questioned at an undisclosed location and clues to the murder might emerge by today evening.
Srinath was active in exposing the corrupt through his RTI activism and had earned the wrath of the rich and the corrupt who saw him as a roadblock for their illegal
activities.
He used to fight injustice by collecting information and had made RTI a powerful weapon.
Srinath had also exposed how BEML Layout was built without permission from the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA). Through RTI, he had waged a war
against some persons since the last three years for building a layout without mandatory permission from MUDA. This issue had even reached the Saraswathipuram
Police Station where compromise meetings were held.
City Police Commissioner Dr. A Subramanyeshwara Rao, Deputy Commissioner (Law and Order) Dr. H.T. Shekar and KR ACP C. Mallik visited the murder spot this
morning and held a meeting with in-charge Inspector of Srirangapatna Police Station M.K. Deepak and Sub-Inspector Puneet. The case will be investigated by
Srirangapatna Police, sources said.
Speaking to Star of Mysore at the MMCR&I mortuary where the post-mortem of Srinaths body was conducted this morning, his brothers V. Srinivas and Pradeep
said that the RTI activist had faced threat from the MUDA engineer and some persons from BEML Layout whose Khata was not issued by MUDA due to illegality.
All of them had openly threatened our brother and we suspect their involvement in the murder. We have also given their names to the Police, they said.
Soon after the murder case was registered yesterday, the Police visited Srinaths house at Rajarajeshwarinagar and recovered many documents regarding the
controversial BEML Layout. Also, many documents regarding other corrupt officers have been recovered, sources said.
Yesterday, Srinaths body was spotted by some passers-by and in-charge Inspector of Srirangapatna Police Station M.K. Deepak found the body wrapped in four bed
sheets. A pit had been dug near the body where turmeric, kumkum, eggs and other items were found.
According to the Police, these items were usually used in black magic and as Dec. 30 (Thursday) was a New Moon (amavasye) the killers would have placed the
items to mislead the investigation team.
The Police also suspect that the assailants might have dumped the body near the river after killing him elsewhere.
Srinath had gone out from his house on Thursday evening on his bike (KA-09-HH-5332) and when his brother V. Srinivas had called him up at 7.30 pm Srinath had
replied that he was heading towards the house of building supervisor Kumar at Vijayanagar and would return soon.
As Srinath did not return and both of his mobile phones were switched off, the family members had lodged a missing person complaint at the Kuvempunagar Police
Station. Srinaths mobile phones and bike have not yet been recovered.
ACB raids MUDA AEs residence, seizes cash and valuables worth crores
Mysuru: The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) police raided the residence of assistant engineer of Mysore Urban Development
Authority (MUDA) on December 6 and seized jewellery and lot of vital documents related to properties owned illegally by him.
general
public,
ACB
cops
raided
the
residence
Based on definite tip offs and complaints from

of
Assistant
Engineer
Mahesh.
It is gathered that large volumes of currencies totaling to crores of rupees, including the new and spiked ones were seized during the early morning
raid.
ACB Superintendent of Police Kavitha led the team of officials comprising DySP Gajendra Prasad, Inspector Anil Kumar and other police personnel.
Are Karnataka HC Judges favoring Land Mafia ?
Recently Karnataka high court gave clearance to Karnataka governments regularization of illegal buildings ( AKRAMA SAKRAMA ) scheme.
1.
Law is one & same for all.
2. Government authorities , police razes down , demolishes small temporary hutments built by tribals , dalits without mercy , takes suo
motto action. No court comes to their rescue.
3.
Till date bagar hukum lands are not given to dalits , tribals are not given land rights over their huts in forests. Is Cout blind , deaf ?
4. However when rich crooks build bungalows , commercial complexes illegally , no suo motto action taken by government authorizes ,
police , why ? Courts go a step further it gives stay orders against demolition of rich crooks illegal buildings , asks government to modify plan ,
law itself to save illegal buildings of rich crooks.
5. Does Karnataka HC has details of exact number of building violations , buildings built on forest lands , lake beds , raja kaluves with
respective after affects on neighbouring buildings , road traffic , ecology , etc and contingency plan by authorities to overcome those after
affects casewise backed by technical studies. Make it public.
6. What criminal action initiated against revenue , police & other officials who failed in their duties at the first instance to stop the illegal
building construction.
7. Small houses of poor people who have smaller building violations but who failed to bribe officials were dealt mercilessly. Their houses
were razed down . Now , will the HC order the government to compensate them , to rebuild houses for them as the court is now saying they are
legal now.
8. Government & HC has given a cut off date for consideration of regularization of illegal buildings. When a crime before that cut off date
becomes legal , why cannt it be legal after that date ?
9.
What guarantee HC gives no illegal buildings has come up after cut off date and will never come in future ?
10. If comes what criminal action against the concerned officials ?

Bottomline : Judges open your eyes , listen , think & then act.
Why MUDA , BDA officials and Public Servants NOT Answering ?
To,
Shri. Dr.Sindhe Bhimsen Rao . H ,
RTI APPELLATE AUTHORITY & CPIO ,
Additional Secretary to Chief Minister ,
Room No 236 , 2nd Floor ,
Vidhana Soudha , Bangalore 560001.
APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.
Please go through the some of actual criminal cases of land grabbings enclosed herewith.
hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made
this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right
by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples representatives , police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned officials fall among the category of
churchills men Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters. To my previous RTI requests & appeals they tried covering up crores worth SCAM by transferring
application from one to the other at the end by denying information to me, Does not the Revenue department possess information ?
We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /
ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT
THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT
OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE
AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN
LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
Main A :
1. The land encroachments & illegal buildings and its continued existence since years is not possible without tacit , covert support of jurisdictional
revenue officials. What disciplinary action has been taken against concerned officials with respect to each case of land encroachment & illegal buildings ,
case wise ?
2.
If not , why ?
3.
Is not land AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME itself illegal ?
4.
Is not the move of government of Karnataka to legalise land encroachments & illegal buildings , in itself illegal ?
5. Till date in some cases of land encroachers are evicted & some buildings violating building byelaws demolished , you could have spared them to enjoy
the benefit of land akrama sakrama scheme. Why you didnt spare them ?
6.
Is this scheme applicable for only chosen few ?
7.
Does this scheme also benefit rich people above BPL ?
8.
Does this scheme also benefit big land developers , land developing companies ?
9.
To my previous RTI appeals to MUDA , BDA only partial information was given , conveniently hiding the truth. Is it not violation of RTI act ?
10. Does not hiding information about land crimes , in itself also a crime ?
11. I have shown in detail some land crimes in Karnataka. What action by government of Karnataka , casewise ?
12. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
13. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
14. Does not hiding a land crime , embolden land grabber to commit more land crimes ?
15. What action taken against BDA , MUDA & Revenue department officials who are covering crores worth land scams inspite of my repeated appeals &
RTI Requests ?
Main B : RTI QUESTIONS Mysore DC , COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) & COMMISSIONER OF MCC
( MYSORE CITY CORPORATION ) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the mysore city's comprehensive city development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the authorities ?
4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?
6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?
7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no
earthquake tolerant . what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?
9. how much of MUDA's / MCC's / GOVERNMENT's lands , sites , buildings & houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through MUDA's / MCC's
resolution instead of of reallotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original
allottee ? if not done so why ?
12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure
followed ?
13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms
among them are legally authorized by MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since 1987 till date ?
14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?
15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms & housing societies who have violated MUDA norms , layout plans , etc ? if not
why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind
safety of people first. MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan
violators & legalizing those
violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally neglected by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT . When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents say
during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn't have a
parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges ,
journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , MUDA /
AUTHORITIES with the help of police razes down those huts & evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA ,
MCC / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files police
complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?
22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES recovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?
24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals tresspassers ? if not why ?
25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to bidders about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?
27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers & selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples.
Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of
such lands. When MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by MUDA MCC or other land
developers ?
31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?
32. in & around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the
HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT
lines as parks , rented out
advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of
electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under
& surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987
castewise , religionwise ?
34. in & around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA & private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake ,
ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by MUDA , MCC & other developers , housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste
generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment & creating public health hazard ? how the MUDA /
MCC is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around mysore city ? what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report
yearwise since 1987 till date .
38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single
firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of
rupees. Has the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB's
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?
40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA's / MCC's CDP & KIADB's industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?
42. is the MUDA & KIADB revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers & Private companies ? on
what legal grounds ?
43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar's report on land grabbings in mysore ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters
has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if not why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be
used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?
46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for alienation ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were
cheated off their dues & the private firm made huge profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social
welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action
has been taken by MUDA , MCC or government in such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by MUDA , MCC & government action taken report yearwise
since 1987 till date ?

50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by MUDA , MCC or authorities , on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?
51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given media publicity ? if not why ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC / REVENUE officials & their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land
usage conversion authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have
sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?
Main C : RTI QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( BDA ) , COMMISSIONER , BRIHATH BANGALORE
MAHANAGARA PALIKE ( BBMP ) & CHAIRMAN , KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ( KIADB) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the Bangalore city's comprehensive city development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT?
6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?
7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no
earthquake tolerant . what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report
yearwise ?
9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings & houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT ` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving
notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?
12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the
procedure followed ?
13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms
among them are legally authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since 1987 till date ?
14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?
15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms & housing societies who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind
safety of people first. BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development
plan violators & legalizing those violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When public
people die , suffer injuries / accidents say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business
complex as the complex doesn't have a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries &
deaths . is not the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges ,
journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts ,
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down those huts & evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs
illegally occupy BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine.
Why this double standard by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?
22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT arecovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?
25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to bidders about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?
27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers & selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate
agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples.
Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of
such lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT or other land developers ?
31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?
32. in & around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under
the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT
lines as parks , rented out advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the movement
of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under & surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since
1987 castewise , religionwise ?
34. in & around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & private developers , the sewage water generated in
those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & other developers , housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste
generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment & creating public health hazard ? how the BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around bangalore city ? what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT against them ? action
taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .
38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single
firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of
rupees. Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB's comprehensive industrial area development
plan ?
40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT's industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?
42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &
Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters
has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if not why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be
used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were
cheated off their dues & the private firm made huge profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social
welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action
has been taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT in such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT action taken
report yearwise since 1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT officials & their family members , who have land acquisition /
denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts ,
NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?
56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA allotment letter no: 310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.
57. why BDA didn't file police complaint to evict encroachers?
58. why BDA didn't inform the descendents of original allottee about the cancellation of their allotment ?
59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?
60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by the resolution of BDA committee legal ?
61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must have informed the original allottee about cancellation of allotment allowing them sufficient time to
reply with public notice in news papers , then they should have allotted the said house to the senior most in the waiting list. But BDA has just allotted the house to an
illegal encroacher by the resolution of BDA committee. Is it legal ?
62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request & stated that the said file concerning this issue cann't be found ie lost . is it legal ?
63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from the record room ? HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA PLEASE REFER THE FOLLOWING
ARTICLE.
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995 - 2015 .
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :

PIO , CHIEF MINSTERS OFFICE , GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA , VIDHANA SOUDHA , BANGALORE.
FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733464 for Rupees TWENTY only
DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.
PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)
PIL Land Mafia and Judges

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore 570017 , Karnataka State
.
....Petitioner
Versus
Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others

....Respondents
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF
MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the
Petitioner above named.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
hearts. They will fight among themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just
before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public
servants.
2. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed to government of karnataka authorities , MUDA , BDA , KIADB , MCC , BBMNP , etc seeking information regarding illegal
buildings , land encroachments specifically in mysore & bangalore , they didnt provide me information. Now one land scam after another are tumbling out.
3. I have given certain details to authorities including judiciary , SCI regarding land , lake encroachments in mysore when encroachment was at preliminary stage.
The authories could have stopped it , but they didn,t. Now , the hinkal lake , hebbal lake , hootagalli lake & BEML Quarters lake have been encroached to maximum
extent and criminals have made crores of rupees profit.
4. Government authorities has not given title deeds to tribals living in forest since centuries , government authorities has not given title deeds to landless people ,
dalits who are cultivating on government land since decades.
5. Government authorities , police immediately evict , take suo motto action when a poor family , nomadic family just erects a hutment on government land. The same
public servants , police dont take action when a rich crook palatial bungalow , business complex on government land , lake bed. Cannt they see it. , they can but are
hands in glove with looters.
6. even some of the judges dont take action when appeal for justice is made to them , to evict encroachers , to stop encroachment. It may be quid pro quo
arrangement with crooks. See how many judges have benefitted from government discretionary quota allotment of sites , illegal judicial layout , etc.
7. The land encroachers are not poor people below poverty line , they dont even have ability to build a pucca house. Encroachers are rich crooks , greedy individuals
with political connection. So they dont deserve compassion.
8. Now , government of karnataka is trying to legalise illegalities in buildings , land encroachments , which gives a booster dose to criminals to commit more crimes.
9. As per equitable law if present land encroachments are legalized , in future too government must legalize future land encroachments when ever it takes place.
10. Prior to enactment of AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME of government of karnataka legalizing illegal constructions , land encroachments, MUDA , BDA , MCC ,
KIADB officials evicted , demolished buildings of encroachers who didnt cough up bribes. The one who paid bribes , their encroachments , illegal buildings survived
and now getting legalized by government.
11. Now , as per equity who ever have been evicted from encroachments , whos illegal buildings demolished must get compensation from government. If not all
encroachers must be evicted & illegal buildings must be demolished.
2. Question(s) of Law:
Is robbing anothers property right , legal ? is robbing land , lake a public property for private , individual use right ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of land grabbing ,frauds.
4. Averment:
Covering up Land Frauds & Land Mafia . Please read details at :
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public
servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through regular mail requesting
them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given. See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see
how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of
rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject
matter of the present petition.
PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public
servants , Government of Karnataka authorities in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.
Kindly read full details at following web page :
Dated : 23rd July 2015 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India.PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
DECLARATION
Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R.
Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017 INDIA
Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S - e Voice For Justice
Periodicity : WEEKLY
Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB
Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .
Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.
Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.
Nationality : INDIAN
Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated to JSS Medical College , Mysore
( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be handed over to JSS
Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of medical students.
Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of
either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate
eye transplantation to the needy.
Home page :
http://evoiceforjustice.dalitonline.in/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/sosevoiceforjustice/ , http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper / ,
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice / , http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com / ,
http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com ,
http://paper.li/f-1368369249 ,
Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,
UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479

Cell : 91 8970318202
It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard the constitutional rights , fundamental rights of every Indian citizen . Since 25 years I am
appealing to SCI about issues concerning public welfare , national security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional rights , human
rights are repeatedly violated but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically , after these appeals for justice , I have suffered
more injustices , attempts on my life were made , physically assaulted , livelihood / jobs were denied , news publication closed , press accreditation
denied , received threatening calls , blank calls, even to date rough elements follow us , rough elements scout near home at mid night. Does not these
indicate some ties between rough elements & SCI Judges ?
Public Interest Litigation is an appeal for justice to the courts , to redress the injustices meted out to the public. Individual cases of injustices pertaining to an
individual are not covered under PIL, however an individual an activist who is fighting for public causes suffering injustices as a result of his
struggle ,caused by powers that be to silence him can club his individual case under the public causes (PIL ) he is appealing.
Nowadays people of questionable character , integrity are being selected to public posts , end result is present day india. In the following web sites I have
shown few actual cases of crimes by judges & police , just imagine what type of justice common man gets.
Traitors in Indian Judiciary & Police
https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police
Crimes by Khaki
https://www.scribd.com/document/334590032/Crimes-by-Khaki ,
Police show full bravery , courage , use full might of law while acting against innocents , commoners. Even takes suo motto action. Frequently crosses legal
limits while acting against commoners like 3 rd degree torture , arrest / search , seizure without warrant , arrest in mid night , etc . While they are supposed to
take action against rich crooks , their own corrupt colleagues no suo motto action , delayed action inspite of complaint allowing time for rich crook to get
anticipatory bail , no 3rd degree torture on him , no arrest , search , seizure without warrant. Where is the bravery , courage of police ?
Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid law book while judging cases of commoners , take suo motto action where as cases involving rich crooks comes
before them inspite of repeated PILs they dont consider it , let alone take suo motto action. Judges make far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting
the rich crook. Where is the wisdom of Judges ?
I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or
else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government.
prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty
culprits , rich crooks , criminals even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be
done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of
lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even
if criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.
Powers that be , higher ups have referred all my previous cases to police although in most of the cases police dont have jurisdiction over it. It sends a subtle
message by police force to the complainant to keep silent . In the remaining cases which are under their jurisdiction police dont act against higher ups , high
& mighty. In such cases police lack practical powers , their hands are tied although they are honest. As a end result , police have repeatedly called me to
police station number of times ( have never called guilty influential persons even once) took statement from me and closed the files.
Hereby , I do make it clear the statements made by me in my original petitions , PILs , news papers , etc while I was in a free & fair atmosphere are
TRUE , over rides , prevails over all the statements made by me before police earlier and which will be made by me in future before police.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward
happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will
be responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is
eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by
GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants & Constitutional functionaries.
date : 01.01..2017..Yours sincerely,

place : IndiaNagaraja.M.R.
Editorial : JAIL the Police & Judges

Human Rights Violations by Judges & Police
The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable & can
be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally
punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-free under his patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he
can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land himself commits crime
violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what
happens ?
individual are not covered under PIL, however an individual an activist who is fighting for public causes suffering injustices as a result of his
struggle ,caused by powers that be to silence him can club his individual case under the public causes (PIL ) he is appealing.
Nowadays people of questionable character , integrity are being selected to public posts , end result is present day india. In the following web sites I have
shown few actual cases of crimes by judges & police , just imagine what type of justice common man gets.
Crimes by Khaki
Police show full bravery , courage , use full might of law while acting against innocents , commoners. Even takes suo motto action. Frequently crosses legal
limits while acting against commoners like 3 rd degree torture , arrest / search , seizure without warrant , arrest in mid night , etc . While they are supposed to
take action against rich crooks , their own corrupt colleagues no suo motto action , delayed action inspite of complaint allowing time for rich crook to get
anticipatory bail , no 3rd degree torture on him , no arrest , search , seizure without warrant. Where is the bravery , courage of police ?
Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid law book while judging cases of commoners , take suo motto action where as cases involving rich crooks comes
before them inspite of repeated PILs they dont consider it , let alone take suo motto action. Judges make far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting
the rich crook. Where is the wisdom of Judges ?
Our whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , police & public service who are an exception.
Judges & Police themselves must first learn to respect human beings as human beings. When you treat them like animals they will also reciprocate do
remember. Or else the almighty will ensure DOGS DEATH to corrupt judges & police. On the D Day in the Almightys court corrupt judges & police will face
ultimate punishment , no match fixing.
Judges & Police must do their constitutional duties without bias , refer following case details and act :
Traitors in Judiciary & Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police ,
The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable & can
be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally
punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-free under his patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he
can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land himself commits crime
violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what
happens ?
It gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals in public service to commit more crimes. that is exactly what is happening in india. the
educated public must raise to the occasion & peacefully , democratically must oppose this criminalization of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a
RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHIS DREAM.
Day after day we are seeing allegations against judges in crimes against women , sex crimes , judicial orders for money , etc in the media. There is total
secrecy in the functioning of judiciary in india with regards to disciplinary proceedings , promotions and selection of judges. We the public dont know whether
proper investigation / enquiry is done in such cases of allegations against judges , what action taken against the guilty judges ?
Hereby , we demand code of conduct for judges & police with provision of criminal prosecution of violators.
Regard for the public welfare is the highest law (SALUS POPULI EST SUPREMA LEX).
No man shall be condemned unheard (AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM).
No man can be judge in his own cause (NEMO DEBET ESSE JUDEX IN PROPRIA SUA CAUSA).
An act of the Court or public office shall prejudice no man (ACTUS CURIAE NEMINEM GRAVABIT).
Yours
Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi
Why NOT Demolish Ministers illegal Bungalows

There are cases of present ministers , past ministers , MLAs , IAS , IPS officers encroaching government land , lakes , etc
and have built palatial bungalows , commercial complexes. Why revenue officials , police are NOT showing guts , performing
impartial duty by demolishing those illegal structures as they do mercilessly with houses of commoners , poor ?
Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
Yours sincerely,
Nagaraja.M.R.
Infosys SAVE Hebbal Lake in Mysuru from Land Mafia
As part of its CSR initiative, Infosys the software giant has recently agreed to fund the beautification , preservation of Hebbal
Lake in Mysuru city of Karnataka state , India. We welcome the good move by Infosys.
However various lakes including Hebbal lake in mysuru city built by erstwhile rulers are encroached by land mafia. The good
brand name of Infosys should not be misused by authorities or powers that be to cover up the crimes of Hebbal lake
encroachments.
Till date Raja Kaluve encroachments , encroachments of Hebbal lake , hootagalli lake , hinkal lake , BEML Quarters lake Ningaiah
lake , etc are not cleared. Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in this matter is pending before the Honourable Supreme Court of India for
admission. Hard earned Infosys share holders money should not be wasted on disputed location.
Even after years , MCC , MUDA , BDA & KIADB are not giving full information / answers to our following RTI questions regarding
Land crimes. To begin with let MCC , MUDA , KIADB answer following three questions :
1. Where are the encroachments of various lakes , Raja Kaluve in mysuru city has taken place ? who are the encroachers ? what
action taken by authorities ?
2. How much land belonging to Sri Laxmikantaswamy Temple , Hebbal , Mysuru has been encroached ? who are the encroachers ?
what action by authorities ?
3. How many commercial complexes , big residential apartments in Mysuru city are built without provision for fire exit , parking lot ?
what action by authorities ?
To preserve lakes Government of Karnataka must :

1.
First conduct survey of sites / lakes , clearly marking the encroachments.
2.
Make the name of encroachers public. Name them & Shame them.
3.
Evict the encroachers & initiate legal prosecution against them.
4.
Finally invest public funds or corporate funds for preservation & beautification of lakes.
Till such time we urge the Infosys management to with hold CSR funding of MCC or MUDA or KIADB for the purpose of
Hebbal Lake preservation. Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
Yours sincerely ,
Nagaraja.M.R.
Save Hebbal Lake Save BEML Quarters Lake in Mysore
An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India
In the past , Mysore Maharaja & other philanthropists have donated their personal lands , properties , built many lakes &
ponds in mysore , bangalore and other places with public concern , public wellbeing in their mind . They built these lakes
& ponds in addition to preserving the natural lakes & ponds. They knew about the importance of ecological balance &
environment. The present rulers , IAS & KAS babus have even failed to preserve the lakes & ponds built decades ago , let
alone build one. These Public servants have extended their tacit support to building mafia , to kill these lakes & ponds , to
fill those lakes with industrial effluents , sewage & building mud wastes. After killing those lakes & ponds , the building
mafia encroaches on it & usurps that public property in turn selling it for crores of rupees.
In this way , Hootagalli lake was killed & encroached by Kaynes Hotel ( now silent shores hotel) , Hebbal Lake is being
killed & encroached from all sides by industries and the lake infront of BEML Quarters is being killed & land demarcation
for selling those land has already begun.
The public servants were totally indifferent towards public outcry against this . The IAS & KAS babus who are also
magistrates with judicial authority have failed in preserving these lakes & ponds inspite of appeals to them. These death of
lakes resulting in their encroachments could have been prevented earlier by DC , Tahsildar , MUDA Commissioner & KIADB
Officers. Even I have appealed to them through my web news paper , they didnt take action at all. I have made RTI request to
those authorities to give me information regarding status of those lakes years ago , fearing truth will come out they didnt
answer my questions in full , they only gave half truths. When I persisted with my RTI request the Mysore District Magistrate
at that time Mr. P.Manivannan repeatedly called me over phone , abused me & threatened me . Even threats were made by
some policemen in mufti . Finally that lake land was allotted to a person supposed to be close to the Industries minister at
that time. The courts are dispassionate & inhuman , while passing eviction orders against poor people , the police are full of
guts & show their full bravery , valour against these poor land encroachers. Fine , let us appreciate their duty
consciousness . However rich & well connected criminals have illegally encroached upon public lands , the same courts
and police are not taking appropriate action inspite of repeated appeals , why ? Even the Supreme Court of India & Police
are Weak & Meek before Land Mafia. Dont the same Judges & Police have Guts , Bravery , Duty Consciousness & Integrity to
take action against such rich land grabbers ? The answer lies in the following articles. Once again we offer our conditional
services to Supreme Court of India , to legally apprehend criminals while the respective public servants have failed to do the
same.
Hereby , we request the honourable Supreme Court of India ,

1.
To initiate criminal prosecution against Mysore district magistrate , Mysore taluk magistrate , MUDA Commissioner ,
Jurisdictional Police Officers & KIADB Officer , for making contempt of Supreme Court of India Order applying
throughout india to preserve lakes & ponds.
2.
To evict all encroachers forth with .
3.
To immediately stop all flow of industrial effluents & sewage to these lakes & ponds.
4.
To initiate criminal prosecution against encroachers of these lakes & pollters , killers of these lakes.
5.
To preserve the said lakes & ponds , by recovering cost from encroachers , polluting industries and the coconspirators Mysore DC , Mysore Tahsildar , MUDA Commissioner , KIADB Officer & Jurisdictional Police Officers.
6.
To protect me , my family members & dependents from land mafia & co-conspirators of the crime.
7.
To order , to issue Writ of Mandamus to Mysore District Magistrate , MUDA Commissioner & KIADB Officer to disclose
all the information sought by me in my RTI request publicly. The copy of my RTI request is reproduced below.
Date : 17.11.2012
Place : Mysore
Yours Sincerely,
Nagaraja.M.R.
Top companies in Byrasandra lake encroachers' list
A Karnataka High Court commissioners report has confirmed encroachment of Byrasandra lake and identified Bagmane Tech
Park, Congnizant Technologies Pvt Ltd and Electronics and Radar Development Establishment (LRDE) among the
occupiers of the encroached lake area.
The commissioner, who submitted his report to the court recently, has identified 3.95 acres of encroachment on the lake, which is
located on survey number 112 of Byrasandra village, Varthur hobli, in Bengaluru East taluk.
The total area of the lake has been identified as 12.21 acres, including the encroached portion, as per the report, a copy of which is
available with DH. The report has identified seven different occupiers of the encroached lake area. Another public sector undertaking
Bharath Earth Movers Ltd is also listed.
Bagmane Tech Park, which is one of the prominent IT parks in Bengaluru and houses many top IT companies, has occupied 36 guntas
of land (approximately 39,207 sqft).
A portion of the LRDE campus, a laboratory of the Defence Research and Development Organisation, is located on the lake area too. It
has occupied 19.5 guntas, as per the report.
The court had in January 2014 appointed Commissioner of Survey Settlement and Land Records (SSLR) as its commissioner and
directed him to conduct a re-survey of the lake and submit a report.
The court had ordered the re-survey as some aggrieved private companies challenged a move by the revenue authorities to recover the
encroached lake land in 2013. Encroachment of Byrasandra lake was first identified in 2007 by the then legislature committee on
encroachment of government lands headed by A T Ramaswamy.
The court commissioner has prepared a sketch and a map of the lake, identifying the exact boundary. The report has identified and
measured encroached and unencroached portions.
Encroachments have been marked on the spot as per the sketch. A prior notice was also issued to all the aggrieved persons before
conducting the re-survey. The re-survey was carried out by the then SSLR commissioner Munish Moudgil.
Bengaluru Urban DCShankar said the re-survey has proved encroachment of the lake by Bagmane Tech Park and others.
Nearly one acre of encroached vacant land of the lake has been already recovered. Now action should be taken on recovering areas
where buildings are located. We have brought the issue to the notice of the legislature committee on lake encroachment headed by
Speaker K B Koliwad. Action will be taken as per the committees directions, Shankar said.
Judicial Layout Site Allotment BRIBE TO JUDGES ?

Throught this publication term JUDGE includes public servants performing quasi judicial functions also. Supreme Court &
High Court judges are repeatedly neglecting our appeals for justice , to reign in land mafia.
Is the allotment of residential plots to Judges @ yelahanka Judicial Layout , a mode of paying bribe to judges by the biggest
litigant government itself & the corrupt public servants in the government. So that the government can pass illegal laws like
Regularization of Illegal Buildings , Illegal Appointments to Medical colleges in Hassan , Mysore ,etc & ministers , IAS
officers can indulge in illegal unconstitutional acts , but the courts will not take any appropriate action suo motto or based
on any petition. IT IS MUTUAL HELP , NEXUS OF TWO CRIMINALS JUDICIARY & GOVERNMENT. Ofcourse , there are
honest few exceptions in judiciary & government. We Respect those honest few.
Just months back , we have witnessed the collapse of a multi storied building in bellary ,Karnataka & we have witnessed a
fire tragedy in a multi-storey building in Bangalore, months ago there was collapse of a huge building under construction in
Bangalore , all resulting in loss of human lives. Recently we have seen de-notification scam involving VVIPs . All these are the
result of violations of Urban Town Planning Laws , Building bye-laws which are observed more in breach by the criminals &
conniving public servants . The authorities are behaving like real estate agents of criminals , by-passing norms , framing
laws to the tune of criminals . Authorities are not honoring RTI requests & even high ranking IAS officer repeatedly threatens
a commoner seeking information under RTI ACT .
Before embarking on land acquisition for any projects government authorities must plan & assess what are the actual
requirement of land for that particular project. After finding out the actual requirement of land , they must assess the loss of
forest area , cost of compensation pay-out , cost of rehabilitation of people , environmental damages & resultant health
damages to people in surrounding areas ,its resultant losses when the project gets running , if at all the benefits , profits
from that project far outweighs the losses ,then only project should be put before the public for their consent. Ministers & IAS
officers must not take these decisions all by themselves in a hush hush manner.
Even when a project is downsized , from the previously approved size , the land left over , surplus land must be given back to
the original owner on first priority . The project managers must not sell those surplus lands to third parties for a premium .
Even when KIADB ,BDA ,MUDA & other authorities acquire lands from farmers ,for constructing industrial parks or
residential layouts , etc , has framed comprehensive development plans (CDP) for their respective cities , clearly demarcating
land usage pattern . However after acquisition of land , the KIADB , BDA , MUDA , etc are selling those very lands to private
third parties for different land usage purposes ,completely violating CDP. Are these KIADB , BDA , BBMP , MUDA ,MCC real
estate agents of Rich people ?
Now , consider NICE BMIC SCANDAL or MINING Scandals , public servants in responsible positions are accusing each
other , there by proving that almost all of them are criminals. In democracy , ministers & IAS officers are public servants ,
MLAs , MPs are not leaders just public servants - representative of people. They must represent peoples wishes & must
order the IAS & other officers to fulfil the wishes of people as per legal provisions.
Information input forms part of process of one's expression. One's expression in any forms written , oral , etc becomes
information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information & Expression are inseparable parts &
form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of
every Indian citizen. When a person's right to expression is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also are
violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.
In a democracy , people have a right to know how the public servants are functioning. However till date public servants are
hiding behind the veil of Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created by british to suppress native indians). By
this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not
being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI purview &
bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.
Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India , DG & IGP of GOK and others were not
honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the
questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to millions of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal
work practices of Indian judges , police & public servants . The information we sought would expose the traitors , antinationals , criminals in public service. The information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The
truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service & strengthens our national security , national
unity & integrity.
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : "writ of Mandamus" and to issue
instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the following Cross
- Examination / RTI questions.
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/chief-justice-above-law
Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.

Date : 05.03.2015
Place : Mysuru
Yours sincerely,
Nagaraja.M.R.
Sign to Save Hebbal Lake & BEML Quarters Lake in Mysore

http://www.change.org/petitions/honourable-supreme-court-of-india-save-hebbal-lake-save-beml-quarters-lake-in-mysore#
To,
Honourable Chief Justice of India ,
c/o Registrar,
Supreme Court of India,
New Delhi.
Honourable sir ,
Subject : - PIL Appeal To Honorable Supreme court of India For Writ of Mandamus
LITMUS TEST for HONESTY of SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
AKRAMA SAKRAMA / REGULARISATION OF ILLEGAL LAND ENCROACHMENTS ILLEGAL LAND CONSTRUCTIONS

BUILDING BYE-LAW VIOLATIONS
KIADB de-notification scandal , BMIC NICE SCANDAL , MINING SCANDALS and Threats to RTI Applicant
Rich builders , crooks in their greed for more money ( knowing fully well the illegalities ) have constructed buildings on public land ,
constructed buildings violating the building bye-laws. Now , those crooks are earning lakhs of rupees rental income . The
government law enforcement agencies were mum , didnt demolish such buildings in time , allowing time for crooks to benefit from
anticipated regularisation. However the same government agencies have not shown kind consideration to poor people who have
constructed temporary hutments on public land . Those hutments were immediately demolished & people evicted.
These building bye-law violators , Land grabbers are not poor people living below poverty line earning only rupees 32 per day as per
planning commission of india. These rich crooks dont deserve sympathy , kind consideration as they have committed the crime
knowing fully well the illegalities and they can bear the loss due to the demolition of their illegal buildings. The government must also
recover rent & other monetary gains made out of those illegal buildings by the builder.
The recent move of Government of Karnataka to regularize building bye-law violations & Public Land Grabbers amounts to :
1.
Rewards for illegalities , crimes if one is rich.
2.
Punishes , demotivates honest law abiding citizens.
3.
Double standards in law one set for rich & one set for the poor.
4.
Total disregard to safety of people in those illegal buildings .
5.
Total disregard to safety of people in the neighbourhood and people using roads passing by those illegal buildings.
Bangalore Rural DC Aiyappa, three revenue officials held
BANGALORE: Lokayukta police have arrested Bangalore Rural district deputy commissioner MK Aiyappa, a special tahsildar, a
revenue inspector and a sub-registrar for allegedly changing records pertaining to 32 acres of land in Survey No. 62 of Madappanahalli,
near Yelahanka.
Lokayukta additional director general of police HNS Rao said they registered a case against 15 persons, including IAS officer Aiyappa
(then Bangalore Urban deputy commissioner), special tahsildar (Bangalore North) K Gopalaswamy, revenue inspector N
Balakrishnamurthy of Arakere circle, Hesaraghatta, and sub-registrar (Hesaraghatta) KV Ravi Kumar.
The arrested officials were produced in the Lokayukta court, which remanded them to a day in police custody. The Lokayukta court had
on November 5 last year ordered that a case be filed under Sections 13 (1)( c), (d), (e) and 13(2) read with Section 12 of the Prevention
of Corruption Act as well as criminal Sections 406, 409, 420, 426, 463, 468, 471, 474 read with Section 120-B (criminal conspiracy).
The Lokayukta court order followed a private complaint by P Anil Kumar, a resident of Hesaraghatta.
Preliminary investigation revealed the land was gomala land (common property resource used for livestock grazing), but a person
named Narasimhaiah claimed ownership of all the 32 acres. Records were created and the land restored to him, but the then revenue
inspector restored the title to the government. Even as the legal dispute was pending, the land was purchased by private individuals.
The Hesaraghatta sub-registrar registered the land in their names in 2009.
"The present rate for the land is about Rs 60 crore. Bigwigs named in the complaint will be questioned, including the purchasers.
Everything is on record, and nobody can deny their responsibility in taking away government land and restoring it to private individuals,"
a Lokayukta police official privy to the investigation told TOI.
There will be some more arrests, he added, as there's ample documentary evidence and other witness accounts available.
NICE Corridor Questions to former CHIEF MINISTER .Mr.Yediyurappa

Read full questionnaire
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/nice-corridor-questions-to-chie\
f-minister
LAND SCAM IN TAMILNADU One for my officer, one for my boy
Land and property are coveted assets. So why are chief ministers allowed to give these away as favours? JEEMON JACOB tracks how
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M Karunanidhi has been using his quotas
IN NOVEMBER, Chief Minister of Karnataka BS Yeddyurappa almost lost his job, due to the uproar over preferential allotment of land
and property to his sons and close associates. He has since cancelled the allotments, asked his children to move out of his official
residence, and retained his seat through some deft political manoeuvring and muscle-flexing. At the height of the campaign against
him, as political opponents paraded on apparent moral high ground, TEHELKA published details of plots similarly allotted by previous
Karnataka chief ministers, both of the Congress and the JD(S), to relatives, servants, drivers, maids and partymen (LAND SCAM 2.0,
4 December). The purpose was not to make Yeddyurappas wrongdoings look less shocking, but to show that the problem was
endemic and needed rooting out. The right given to chief ministers to hand out public land to a favoured few relatives, bureaucrats,
judges, police officers and others smacks of nepotism and arbitrary feudal power structures that should have no place in a modern
democracy. (Though there is no immediate proof of this, some of these allotments could also be benamitransactions, in which the
ultimate ownership remains with the distributor of the largesse, camouflaged by a stack of fake documents.)
This power euphemistically called discretionary quota has even been used to favour allegedly corrupt army officers like General
Deepak Kapoor (AT EASE WITH GREASE, TEHELKA, 20 November), who was given a large 500 sq yd plot in Haryana by the Hooda
government, which then faced the embarrassment of refusing him permission to sell it off before five years had elapsed, as per rules.
The plot was given to him by the government as preferential allotment in recognition for his outstanding achievement.
This week, continuing its campaign against out-of-turn allotments of land and property, TEHELKA has an expos on Tamil Nadu Chief
Minister M Karunanidhi. The Tamil Nadu Housing Board (TNHB) which commands a large land bank, has a government discretionary
quota (GDQ) under which 15 percent of all allotments can be recommended by the CM. Eligibility for allotment under GDQ is as follows:
single/deserted women; widows; social workers; physically handicapped persons; defence personnel; ex-servicemen; eminent persons
in the field of science, arts, literature, economics, public administration and sports; freedom fighters; government servants with
unblemished service records; employees of PSUs, central government undertakings and nationalised banks; PF institutions; journalists;
university staff; and employees of local bodies and municipalities.
While some of these categories sound kosher, most of them raise a fundamental question: why should the government have the power
to give coveted land to select employees and journalists over others? The only rationale could be proximity which is an untenable
reason for being the beneficiary of political favours, often worth several crores.
Setting this aside, even within the legal ambit of the GDQ, TEHELKAs investigation shows that many of the allotments in Karunanidhis
tenure have violated the rule book. Many bureaucrats and their relatives have been given plots or flats under the category of social
worker. Some of these last did social work when they were in college; many of them claim to be volunteers in such routine activity as
helping in blood donation or eye camps. Many have issued certificates to themselves; some have acquired letters from the Lions and
Rotary Clubs with vague endorsements. In other violations, the rules say that no one who has any other land or property in Tamil Nadu
or any other capital city, in either their own or spouse or minor childrens name, can apply for GDQ allotments. TEHELKA found this is
routinely violated.
The other brazen violation lies in the claim of unblemished service records as a qualification for allotment. When RTI activist V
Gopalakrishnan sought a
list of such bureaucrats,
Additional Secretary S
Many of the allottees issued certificates to themselves, while some got letters from Lions and Rotary Clubs
Solomon Raj said, As no
unblemished government servant certificates are issued, the question of furnishing a list of names does not arise. The additional
secretary also clarified that the home department didnt have such a list. This is the phantom category under which many public
servants like Jaffar Sait, 1986 batch IPS officer, now Inspector General of PoliceIntelligence, got large allotments of land in prime
locations. Why them more than hundreds of others? Thats a democratic question the chief minister will have to answer.
jee@gmail.com
Legal Largesse
R Bhanumathi
Serving Judge, Madras High Court
FLAT NOS: MIG 249-250, SHOLINGANALLUR PHASE III, CHENNAI
DATE: 30 MARCH 2008
SIZE: 120 SQ M & 139 SQ M
PRICE: Rs. 27.55 LAKH & Rs. 30.05 LAKH
CURRENT MARKET PRICE: NA
VIOLATIONS
The judge was allotted two adjoining plots on the same day (30 March 2008).
According to her Disclosure of Assets statement of 2009, the judge already had
a house in her name, and another plot in her husband, advocate K Ganesans
name. The house, in the Uthangarai area of Krishnagiri district, was constructed
in 1985 on a plot purchased in 1982. The plot of land is located in Saidapet and
was purchased in 1993. She however admits in her declaration that she owns
two plots, which she purchased from the TN Housing Board in 2008. But this
allocation was made under the General Category. Since judges do not come
under any of the quota categories, the governments way of allotting land to
them differs from the rest. Judges are informed about the availability of land.
And when they apply for the same, the government facilitates the allotment.
K Raviraja Pandian
Retired Justice, Madras High Court
PLOT NO: B2/5, THIRUVANMIYUR EXTENSION
DATE: 11 NOVEMBER 2009
SIZE: 3,117 SQ FT
PRICE: Rs. 68.54 LAKH
CURRENT MARKET PRICE: Rs. 3.2 CRORE
VIOLATIONS
Close relative of DMK supremo Karunanidhi and the Chairman of the School
Fee Determination Committee. Little wonder then he was also the recipient of
special favours while he was still a serving judge. At the time of the allotment,
the judge owned a 50 percent share in an ancestral house at
Thiruveezhimizhalai village. The judge had also sold a property he owned at
Pazhavatthankattali village near Kumbakonam. The land was purchased in
1991, a house was constructed on it in 1992 and sold in 2009. He had also sold
the landed property of his wife in 2009.
V Ambika
Advocate
PLOT NO: A8, KADAPERY, MADHURANTHAGAM
DATE: 16 FEBRUARY 2008
SIZE: 2,285 SQ FT
CURRENT MARKET PRICE: Rs. 15 LAKH
VIOLATIONS
The advocate owned landed property in more than one location when she was
allotted the plot one vacant house site in Karanai Puducheri village and
another in Katrampakkam village, in Kancheepuram district. Her husband,
Justice M Satyanarayanan of the Madras High Court, in his Disclosure of
Assets, stated that he owns a repurchased MIG flat constructed in 1969 at Indra
Nagar in Chennai. Ambika was allotted land under the GDQ.
Bureaucratic Bonanza
Jaffar Sait
IGP-Intelligence
FLAT NOS: 540, THIRUVANMIYUR, KAMARAJ NAGAR
DATE: 23 APRIL 2008
SIZE: 4,756 SQ FT
PRICE: Rs. 1.26 CRORE
CURRENT MARKET PRICE: Rs. 6 CRORE
VIOLATIONS
Allotted under unblemished government servant category. On 6 June 2008,
the government transferred the ownership of the plot to his daughter Jennifer
Jaffar, then a student. Jennifer made two payments of Rs. 46.03 lakh and
Rs.1.73 lakh towards cost of the plot. In February 2009, she paid another Rs.60
lakh. After having paid Rs.1.07 crore, the ownership of plot was transferred to
her mother Parvin Jaffar. Interestingly, Parvin also made the payment all over
again. In October 2009, she paid Rs. 50.64 lakh and then again in November
2009, another Rs. 25 lakh was deposited. A further payment of Rs. 51.5 lakh in
the same month was made. Income tax officials feel the Sait family made the
double payment to avoid an IT investigation on Jennifer, who would not have
been able to show any source of income. The Tamil Nadu Housing Board then
returned the original amount paid by Jennifer. Now, Parvin in collaboration with
Durga Sankar, son of an IAS officer, has commissioned a builder to construct a
multi-storey complex in which 12 flats have already been built. Each flat is
expected to fetch an estimated 1 crore. So, by paying Rs. 1.26 crore in 2009,
the IGPs family made a profit of more than Rs. 5.7 crore.
G Prakash
Joint Secretary, Industries
PLOT NO: S6, THIRUVANMIYUR EXTENSION
DATE: 6 MAY 2008
SIZE: 3,829 SQ FT
VIOLATIONS
The former district collector of Tirunelveli issued himself a certificate for
unblemished government service.
CK Gariyali
Retired IAS, Secretary to Governor at the time of allotment
FLAT NOS: S4, THIRUVANMIYUR EXTENSION
DATE: 7 MAY 2008
SIZE: 6,023 SQ FT
PRICE: Rs. 1.20 CRORE. PAYMENT WAS MADE IN 33 INSTALMENTS FROM
18 JULY 2008 TO 6 MARCH 2009
CURRENT MARKET PRICE: Rs. 6.8 CRORE (APPROX)
VIOLATIONS
Her husband Dr S Rajakumar has a house in Chennai.
Sumathi Ravichandran
Former Regional Passport Officer, Chennai, and close relative of DMK minister
K Anbazhagan
PLOT NO: 1050 HIG, MOGAPPAIR
DATE: 28 MARCH 2008
SIZE: NA
VIOLATIONS
Her husband Dr S Ravichandran owns a plot. Following an RTI probe, the
TNHB issued a show-cause notice and placed the allotment under suspension.
Political Perks
L Ganeshan
Former MP, who left Vaiko to join DMK
FLAT NOS: 1052 HIG, MOGAPPAIR
DATE: 27 MARCH 2008
SIZE: NA
VIOLATIONS
Ganeshan is a trade union leader with the DMK and is close to Karunanidhi. He
owns property in his as well as his wifes name.
Brinda Nedunchezhiyan
Wife of late Chezhiyan and daughter-in-law of Agriculture Minister Veerapandi
Arumugam
PLOT NO: HIG B 3/14, MOGAPPAIR
DATE: 13 MARCH 2008
SIZE: NA
CURRENT MARKET PRICE: Rs. 45-50 LAKH
VIOLATIONS
Allotted flat under Social worker category. The tehsildar of Salem issued her a
certificate though he is not empowered to. The certificate says she is a wellknown social worker involved in social welfare activities such as president of
Poolavari village panchayat, head of parent-teachers association, participating
in educational programmes of many schools.
S Rajalakshmi
Wife of R Sakkarapani, MLA and DMK chief whip
PLOT NO: 1047, MOGAPPAIR

DATE: 9 MARCH 2008
SIZE: NA
VIOLATIONS
She was allotted the flat under the Social Worker category. The supporting
document was a letter from a Rotary Club. The letter from PNK
Venkatachalapathy, president of the Rotary Club of Oddachatram, dated 31
March 2008, states that she is known to me as a social worker who is
participating in social service activities of our Rotary Club at blood donation
camps, free health checkup camps and other welfare activities. She has also
been helping in providing several other basic amenities for the people
surrounding the slum area for the past several years. I wish her every success
to do more services to needy people in and around the area.
D Yasodha
Congress MLA, Kancheepuram Congress MLA, Kancheepuram
FLAT NOS: A5, HIG, MOGAPPAIR
DATE: 19 DECEMBER 2008
SIZE: NA
VIOLATIONS
A certificate from the Chennai Municipal Councillor stating she has been an
active social worker for the past 40 years actively involved in helping the poor in
the area.
Poochi Murugan
Member of a DMK trade union
PLOT NO: A 11, THIRUVANMIYUR EXTENSION
DATE: 6 JUNE 2008
SIZE: 2,422 SQ FT
VIOLATIONS
Though a member of a DMK trade union, he was allotted land under the Social
Worker category. Has three plots in his name and one in his spouses name. He
has not produced any supporting document about the social work he has done.
Bharati Thennarasu
Widow of Sivagangai politician Thennarasu
FLAT NOS: S7, THIRUVANMIYUR EXTN
DATE: 26 AUGUST 2008
SIZE: 3,879 SQ FT
VIOLATIONS
She was allotted the plot under the Social Worker category. An RTI application
revealed that she had not been engaged in any kind of social work that would
make her eligible for this category.
P Moorthy
Madurai MLA
FLAT NOS: E2/6, MIG, MOGAPPAIR
DATE: 5 DECEMBER 2008
SIZE: NA
VIOLATIONS
Allotted under the Social Worker category on a certificate issued by the Lions
Club. Owns several plots in his and his wifes name.
N Soorya
Daughter of Brinda Chezhiyan and grand-daughter of Agriculture Minister
Veerapandi Arumugam
FLAT NOS: B3/13, HIG, MOGAPPAIR
DATE: 3 JUNE 2008
SIZE: NA
CURRENT MARKET PRICE: Rs. 45-50 LAKH
VIOLATIONS
Like her mother, the 20-year-old was given a certificate of social work and
domicile by the tehsildar of Salem, stating that she is a wellknown social
worker who is involved in many social welfare activities, such as national social
service, participating in eye camp, blood donation and giving education to poor
students. The certificate was issued on 27 February 2008, the same day her
mother got one. Both got adjoining flats.
Kith and Kin
Deepa
Daughter of Devaraj M, Private Secretary to the Chief Minister
FLAT NOS: 543, THIRUVANMIYUR, KAMARAJ NAGAR (PLOT ADJOINING
SAITS AND SHANKARS)
DATE: 23 MAY 2008
SIZE: 4,466 SQ FT
VIOLATIONS
Allotted plot under the Social Worker category but theres no evidence to back
it. Constructing a three-storey building involving a cost beyond the familys
known sources of income. Her husband owns another property in his name. Her
plot is adjacent to the plots of IGP-Intelligence Jaffar Sait and Durga Shankar,
son of the CMs secretary.
Naveenkumar
Son of P Muthuveeran, IAS, who was District Collector, Theni, and close to the
Chief Minister
FLAT NOS: 541, HIG, THIRUVANMIYUR, KAMARAJ NAGAR
DATE: 27 JULY 2008
SIZE: NA
VIOLATIONS
Allotted flat under the Social Worker category. He works in a software company
in Chennai and submitted a salary slip of Rs. 20,000 per month at the time of
allotment. Now, he is constructing a fourstorey structure on the plot.
J Naveen Ibrahim
Son of SI Jaffar Ali, IPS (retd)
FLAT NOS: AI HIG MOGAPPAIR
DATE: 31 MARCH 2009
SIZE: NA
VIOLATIONS
Allotted flat under the Social Worker category. Certificate issued relates to 1983,
when he was a student. The college principal says he actively participated in
many social activities conducted by us. He continues to evince interest in social
service activities. Curiously, the EMI of Rs. 74,000 is almost double his monthly
salary.
Durga Sankar
Son of Rajamanikkam, IAS, Secretary to Chief Minister
FLAT NOS: 538, THIRUVANMIYUR, KAMARAJ NAGAR (PLOT ADJOINING
SAITS AND SHANKARS)
DATE: 28 MARCH 2008
SIZE: 2,450 SQ FT
VIOLATIONS
He is a businessman, but allotted the plot under the Social Worker category. He
also submitted an affidavit that the plot would be used for residential purposes.
But he violated the conditions and developed the property for commercial
purposes.
The Others
M Ilamukil
IT Manager, DMK HQ, Chennai
VIOLATIONS
Allotted flat under the Social Worker category on a certificate issued by the
Lions Club. The certificate states that he is participating in social service
activities of Lions Club at blood donation camp, free health camps for the past
several years.
Ilanthendral
Ilamukils sister
VIOLATIONS
Allotted HIG flat under the Social Worker category on the basis of a certificate
issued by a panchayat, which is not valid.
N Kannabiran
Junior attendant at the Supreme Court
VIOLATIONS
Allotted flat under the Social Worker category. Kannabiran, a Delhi resident,
was issued a salary certificate by the SC registrar for purchasing land in Tamil
Nadu. He was allotted on the recommendation of his superior, who has close
links with the DMK.
C Ganeshan and C Vinothan
PSOs, CMs Security
VIOLATIONS
Allotted flats under the unblemished government servants category.
Documents reveal the Superintendent of Police, Security Branch, Chennai,
issued vague conduct certificates after the duo were allotted the flats
provisionally.
P Meena
W/O P Pandian, PSO, CMs Security
VIOLATIONS
Allotted flat under the Social Worker category. She produced a letter from MS
Velu of the Lions Club, who liberally issued certificates for sons and daughters
of bureaucrats to help them avail of prime plots allotted by the TN Housing
Board out of the government discretionary quota.
PHOTOS: THE HINDU, JEEMON JACOB
Reactions to Land Scam 3.0
D Yashoda, Congress MLA, Kancheepuram
I have done a lot of work for Dalits throughout Tamil Nadu, especially in
Sriperumbudur and Chennai. I have helped them in getting pattas for their land,
recommending their names for loans from banks, distributing cycles to Dalits on
the birthdays of Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi.
Jaffar Sait, IPS, IG-Intelligence
Government agencies have already probed the matter. I am being governed by
the conduct rules, so I should not talk to you about the issue. It is advisable that
you seek a response from the Tamil Nadu government. I would like to add that if
any defamation or liability arises out of your article, necessary legal action would
be taken.
P Moorthy, Madurai MLA
I dont know much about the certificate, I think I got the plot because Im an MLA.
I have done a lot of work in uplifting the people in villages of my constituency.
That amounts to social work. I dont need a social work certificate from the Lions
Club but my friends, partners and I took the certificate anyway.
GDQ is a way of making you part of the syndicate

BY JEEMON JACOB
A1990 batch IAS officer, C Umashanker shot to fame during the AIADMK regime when he exposed a scam in
the construction of sheds in a cremation ground under the Jawahar Rozgar Yojana when he was additional
collector in Madurai. His brush with AIADMK supremo J Jayalalithaas partymen resulted in his transfer out of
the district.
C Umashanker
PHOTO: JEEMON
JACOB
Later, when the DMK came to power, he was appointed managing director of the state-run Electronic Corporation of Tamil Nadu and put
in charge of procuring colour television sets for free distribution to the poor in the state, in keeping with an election promise of the DMK.
He was transferred with immediate effect after he exposed corporate fraud committed by the joint venture promoter ELNET
Technologies Ltd.
Later, he was posted as managing director of the state-run Arasu Cable TV Corporation. In this capacity, he opposed the monopoly of
Sumangali Corporation run by Kalanidhi Maran. He also took steps to nationalise Sumangali Cable Vision. By that time, Maran had a
patch-up with the Karunanidhi family and Umashanker was transferred with immediate effect.
Later, the anti-corruption and vigilance department registered a case against him for disproportionate assets. The government
suspended him for claiming fake caste certificate as a Dalit when he is a practising Christian.
He lodged a complaint with the National Backward Commission against his suspension and got a favourable
order from the High Court. At present, he is managing director of Tamil Nadu Small Industries Corporation.
Plots are allotted even

without any formal
applications. There is
no transparency at all
Umashanker was allotted a plot (under government order 2D 325) on 3 April 2008 at Thiruvanmiyur Extension when he was in charge
of the free colour television for the poor programme. For this, he would have had to pay 55.12 lakh. He wrote to the chief minister that
he could not afford to pay such a huge amount. Later, his allotment was cancelled without stating any reason.
Umashanker revealed he had an MIG flat in his name when the plot was allotted and he was not aware about the rule of Tamil Nadu
Housing Board (TNHB) that he cant claim a plot when he has another flat in his name.
It certainly seems commendable that Umashanker turned down a chance to own a plot in Thiruvanmiyur Extension, one of the poshest
areas of the city. The plot is just 300 metres from the beach.
Though the entire colony has been parcelled out to those close to the ruling establishment, it is the nouveau riche and the industrialists
who dream of owning a house in Thiruvanmiyur, where they can rub shoulders with former judges, bureaucrats and political power
brokers. If and when the allottees decide to sell their plots, they can demand extremely high prices.
In a frank chat, Umashanker talks about how the government discretionary quota has been misused. Excerpts:
Why are bureaucrats, judges, former judges and politicians given housing plots in posh localities under government discretionary
quota?
Who can refuse a good piece of land in Chennai city? Its a way of rewarding people for good work done. No inquiry has been
conducted in this matter so far. Discretionary quota is the prerogative of the government. After RTI came into existence, several
activists are taking up the matter in court. Basically, there is no control mechanism or checks and balances. There is little transparency
while awarding the GDQ the plots are allotted without formal applications.
You were also allotted a plot in 2008 under the unblemished government servant category. What happened to the allotment?
Yes, I was allotted a plot in Thiruvanmiyur Extension. Initial payment for the plot was Rs. 25 lakh. I never had that much money. So I
requested the government to reduce the price. But there was no response. I did not want a house to compromise my integrity. So I
never took possession. Later, in 2009, the government ordered a vigilance inquiry against me and cancelled the allotment. Frankly, I
was not aware about the TNHB rules that bars a person having a plot, a flat or a house from claiming another plot.
Do you think the GDQ quota is a way of silencing people, buying them out?
Yes, it is a way of making you a part of the syndicate. Plots or flats are given to those civil servants, judges or relatives of the
bureaucrats or politicians for complying with certain requirements. There is no procedure for IAS or IPS officers to get a land or plot or
flat in a transparent manner. So everybody uses short cuts.
Ministers DQ proves judges are more corrupt than civil servant
NEW DELHI/BHUBANESWAR: An investigation by Cobra post and IBN Network has revealed how former and sitting judges of Orissa,
police officers and bureaucrats have received flats from the DiscretionaryQuota (DQ) of ministers. As a matter of fact, successive Urban
Development Ministers in the Naveen Patnaik government have misused the discretionary housing quota.
According to the revelation, the judges have got the minister quota flats out of turn and at cheaper rates.
The IBN Network accessed letters of judges written to the government asking for prime property in Cuttack and Bhubaneswar.
Prime properties were acquired in Cuttack at concession rates, bypassing the Cuttack Development Authority. In fact, Sectors 10, 11
and 13 of Cuttacks Abhinav Bidanasi project has practically become a judges residential colony.
Former Chief Justice G B. Patnaik is a resident of flat 1B/22 in Sector 11 while former Orissa High CourtJudge Radhakrishna Patra has
flat 1B/23 in the same sector, given out on lease.
Supreme Court judge Deba Priya Mohapatra, Orissa High Court judges Sanju Panda, Madan Mohan Das, Nityanand Prastuti also own
flats in Sector 10 and 11.Papers for the flats were prepared quickly and some judges even got preferred plots.
Most of the allotments took place between 2000 and 2007, under the BJP cadre Urban and Housing Development Minister Sameer
De who was State Development Minister from 2000-2004 and then Kanak Vardhan Singh Deo who called the shots from 2004 to 2007.
All that the judges had to do was written to the Minister. The CNN-IBN has a letter written by Justice Madan Mohan Das to the CDA
Chairman and to Minister Kanak Vardhan Singhdeo, asking for a B-Category Flat in Sector 10, saying he would ensure a third party
transfer of a C-Category Flat already owned by his wife.Justice Das was allotted the flat in just six days.
When asked why the discretionary quota was used to make the allotments, Sameer Dey, former Orissa urban development minister,
said, The Orissa act does not have any such rule. There is 5 per cent and 10 per cent allocation in discretionary quota. Apart from that
we dont have any rule.
Kanak Vardhan Singh Deo, former Orissa urban development minister, said, The rule is that only those who apply for the project can
be allotted land via Discretionary Quota. So if any such person does not apply what can we do?
CNN-IBN has also found that many of the judges who were allotted land through the discretionary quota already own ancestral property
in Cuttack. Yet the ministers were allotted the land they asked for.
Mysore DC indicted for illegally delisting Rs 6k crore land
BANGALORE: A major land scam worth nearly Rs 6,000 crore, involving about 2,000 acres at the foothills of Chamundi Hills in
Mysore, has been unearthed.
Mysore deputy commissioner P S Vastrad is in the spotlight for illegally delisting in June nearly 2,000 acres of prime
government land in favour of the Mysore royal family. The land in question is 1,541 acres in Kurubaralli, 259 acres in
Chowdahalli and 173 acres in Alanahalli. The market value of an acre in these areas is between Rs 1 crore and Rs 3 crore.
Some top state BJP leaders and influential religious leaders are said be behind the illegal conversion of the land from 'B'
kharab to 'A' kharab. According to the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, 'B' kharab land is property reserved for a public
purpose. Any conversion of this to 'A' kharab - making it private property - needs government authorization. But Vastrad
passed the order without bringing it to the notice of the government.
"This happened when DV Sadananda Gowda as chief minister held more than 20 portfolios, including revenue. Lack of
monitoring in the revenue department enabled the deputy commissioner to change the format," government sources said.
Following complaints against the change in land use, deputy chief minister in charge of revenue K S Eshwarappa ordered a
probe by chief secretary S V Ranganath, who has given a report indicting Vastrad of being "guilty of misconduct".
The land was mentioned as kharab in survey records dating back to 1861. Later, during a resurvey between 1920 and 1930,
the same land was shown as 'B' kharab.
"It appears the DC executed the order in undue haste. Any decision with respect to such land can only be taken by the
government under Section of 86 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. The delisting of land from 'B' kharab to 'A' kharab
without considering the original survey records of 1861 is illegal," the chief secretary said in his report.
Sources in the government said the Mysore royal family had been claiming right over the land after the death of the Mysore
Maharaja in 1974, but several orders of the department of personal and administrative reforms clearly state the land belongs
to the government. "The heir of the last Maharaja had been raising disputes. Due to this and multiple litigation, unscrupulous
elements are trying to falsify records to gain control over this precious land," they added.
Interestingly, the DC withdrew his June order on August 18 on being indicted. Meanwhile, the Karnataka High Court ordered
the status quo.
Chief minister Jagadish Shettar, who wanted to suspend Vastrad, is said to have dropped the idea following pressure from
top BJP leaders. The government feels that shunting him out at a time when Dasara preparations are under way would mar
the festivities.
"I will urge the CM to convene a meeting and take action against the DC," Eshwarappa told TOI.
DC Vastrad yielded to real estate lobby: MLC
Mysore: BJP MLC G Madhusudan on Friday accused Mysore DC P S Vastrad of succumbing to the real estate lobby in a case
related to some 2,000-acre land at the foothills of Chamundi Hills.
He has complained to CM Jagadish Shettar in this regard. The BJP leader has also asked for a stay on the proceedings
following the order by Vastrad.
In his complaint to Shettar, the MLC said: "The land at the foothills is quite precious and costs several thousand crores as per
the present market... You are requested to go through the documents and take up investigation into the matter." In the
strongly-worded letter, he has told the CM that "people are alleging that the DC has succumbed to the real estate lobby."
Releasing the copies of his petition, and that of related documents to the media on Friday, Madhusudan asked the CM to
intervene. According to him, the court of the deputy commissioner has declared it as B-kharab land and has directed the
authorities concerned to issue khathas in the name of Srikantadatta Narasimharaaja Wadiyar, the scion of Mysore royal family
and other respondents. In 1935 -- when Maharaja was ruling the state -- the said land was declared as B-kharab, which
remained the same all these years. In fact, Maharajas Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar and Jayachamaraja Wadiyar wanted that to
be maintained as a green belt to guard the sanctity of the sacred site. "To ensure this, maharaja Jayachamaraja Wadiyar did
not make any attempt to register the property in his name till his death," he contended, adding that he didn't even go in for
partition of the land in Kurburhalli.
Claiming that it is a public property, the MLC accused the DC of taking arbitrary decisions. "First of all, he can't review any
decisions made in the district magistrate court. Secondly, he has to call public objections or have to seek opinion of public
prosecutor before conversion of land from B-kharab (unusable land) to A-kharab, which he has not done."
"There real estate lobby is behind it to usurp the property which needs to be probed," the BJP leader said. He, however, was
evasive when asked to name those involved. When asked whether district minister S A Ramdas is aware of it, he accused him
of being negligent on the issue.
Meanwhile, deputy CM K S Eshwarappa, who also holds the revenue portfolio, said that he has convened a high-level
meeting, and directed both the DC and the MLC to attend the same.
BMIC by NICE & land scams in Karnataka an appeal to honourable supreme court of India & H.E.Honourable Governor Of
Karnataka
When a crime is noticed , it is the duty of the government to investigate who did it ? and to legally prosecute them in court &
provide justice . if thousands of criminals , lakhs of criminals got together & did the same type of crimes , all of them must
be legally prosecuted. Just for the overwhelming numbers of criminals law of the land cann't be changed. However in the
Karnataka state , many political bigwigs , rich crooks have done the same crime , LAND GRABBING illegal possession of
government land & illegal constructions over it. Important land records of those government lands , lands belonging to poor
are lost in record rooms of civic bodies ( cunningly destroyed by corrupt officials ) Now, their political masters are legalizing
the crimes . what a shame to the government of Karnataka ?
The shri.A.T. RAMA SWAMY , (M.L.A) standing committee in the Previous legislative assembly probed the land grabbings in
Karnataka & gave it's report to the government . However the government in a hurry , is auctioning off those government
lands without proper publicity to the auction process , sufficient time for bidder's expression of interest. In some cases , a
pittance is levied as penalty for the illegal occupation to get it legalized. The government is not bothered about legally
prosecuting the illegal occupier of those lands. In many civic bodies , important property documents belonging to the
government & poor are missing from the record rooms. All these point towards the government intention , to legalise the
crimes of illegal land occupiers who are nothing but their own political cronies.
The recent ordinance by government of Karnataka to regularize land deals is envisaging to legalize the crimes of rich. The
illegal land conversions , land encroachments , encroachment of civic amenities made by the rich are being legalized with
levying a pittance as penalty in the name of public welfare . Whereas the land worth at today's market prices are 10's of
thousands of crore it is only wefare of the rich & mighty . IT IS GOING TO BE MOTHER OF ALL SCAMS. The authorities evict
poor tribal people from their ancestral forest area in the name of conservation , evict tribal people from villages in the name of
development without proper rehabilitation measures. The government is not giving land rights to slum dwellers , poor , dalits
over the land they are dwelling , the government is deaf to appeals of dalits for land rights. However the same government is
sympathetic to rich who have encroached land & built huge commercial complexes worth crores violating all norms with total
disregard to civic amenity or safety.
ILLEGALITIES IN AUCTION OF M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD MYSORE
During the auction of above sick industry the land usage was for industrial purpose only. so, people with other commercial
objectives were not allowed to participate in the auction. Thereby, the final auctioned amount was very much less than the
market value. This has a direct bearing on employees of that industry , lending banks , govt dept , etc who have all put
forward their claims for dues from that industry. noW, all of them are getting very much less than what is due from the closed
company. A loss of crores of rupees to banks , government , employees has been made by the cunningness of civic bodies.
Now in a backdoor move the M.U.D.A , K.I.A.D.B , M.C.C are moving to give land usage conversion to the new occupier, who is
building posh villas & resorts here. Is it right & justified ? should not they conduct auction once again or charge market value
to the new owner.
LAND MAFIA IN KARNATAKA
The land mafia which has links with political leadership & top govt servants in the state, is running business widely in &
around bangalore,mysore & other major towns. The authorities like city corporation , B.D.A, M.U.D.A , K.I.A.D.B , etc are
denotifying the lands meant for public welfare in favour of land mafia. The authorities have earmarked these lands for public
welfare ie parks , schools , hospitals at the planning stage itself for current & future needs of the people. In most cases the
land mafia has illegally occupied the lands , built commercial complexes & sold it for crores of rupees.
1. the authorities are not demolishing these illegal structures & prosecuting the occupiers.
2. In some cases the authorities are denotifying , regularizing those illegal occupations by levying a pittance as penalty which
is very much less than the market value.
3. In some cases for example a notified site for school is alloted to an educational trust. They build 2 rooms in 25% of the site
& state that this is free school meant for weaker sections. After a year or two , they state before the authority that to run this
school they need funds. So they are planning to build commercial complexes around the school site & by the rent collected
from shops they will run the school. In this manner sites meant for schools , hospitals , temples & other social organisations
apply for conversion of land usage & use major portion of the land for commercial purposes.
Hereby , e-voice urges the govt of karnataka & other authorities ,
1. to clearly demarcate the govt lands & announce it boldly to the public.
2. To clearly demarcate lands meant for public amenities both for current & future usage.
3. To clearly demarcate lands required for town planning say 20 years down the line.
4. To clearly mention in such plans the purpose it is reserved for ie parks , hospitals , schools , etc.
5. To impartially act against illegal occupiers rich or poor.
6. Say while denotifying a land meant for school an alternate land for school must be incorporated in the original plan.
7. Before denotification public objections must be called for & considered responsibly.
8. After denotification the land must be sold at the market rate not the govt rate.
9. In case of land usage conversion also the objections from the public must be called for & considered responsibly.
10. After land usage conversion an alternate land must be incorporated in the plan for the original use.
11. In case of land usage conversion also the occupier must be charged at the market value.
12. To declare annually the property details of all officials with denotifying / land usage conversion authorities together with
details of their family member's properties with provision for public scrutiny, cross checking.
13. To ruthlessly prosecute the corrupt officials & ministers.
14. To make public the report of past district magistrate mysore mr. T.M. VIJAYA BHASKAR about illegal land dealings in &
around mysore. Also the action taken report.
ILLEGALITIES IN BANGALORE-MYSORE EXPRESSWAY PROJECT BMIC by NICE
Different political parties are trading charges against each other about illegalities in the mysore-bangalore expressway
project. Grave mistakes have been committed by the previous state governments. The saving grace is judiciary has taken
note of it. The fundamental principle behind land acquisitions by the governments is to use that acquired lands for public
welfare. As the govt acquires the land with this noble intentions even the land looser contents himself with compensation at
govt rate. Always the govt rate is much below market value. If at all the govt wants to give out that acquired land to a private
party for private use or for the use of a selected few, the govt must give prevailing market rate to the land looser. In such
cases the govt does not have authority to force the land owner to sell his property.
In this mysore-bangalore 4 lane expressway project, following inconsistencies are there,
1. this road is not for free public use, but only for those who pays the toll fees.
2. The luxurious resorts , townships , etc which are to be built alongside this road are not open for free public usage but only
for the rich who can afford it.
3. The govt has concluded this deal in a hush-hush manner.
4. Any disputes raised by this project should be addressed to international arbiter at london which a poor land owner or
general public can ill-afford.
5. The govt has not paid the prevailing market value to the land loosers.
6. The govt has not given the option to land owners not to sell their property.
7.
This whole project is for rich , built by the rich for the rich & not meant for public welfare.
The govt must give back the lands to the owners who wants it back & must pay the market value to those willing to sell. As
this project is built by wealthy people for wealthy people why cann't they cough- up market value?
CRIMES BY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( B.D.A)

AGAINST A POOR WOWAN
The B.D.A flouts it's own rules & spreads red carpet for big land developers & land grabbers. B.D.A posting is a huge money
spinner for corrupt officials. The corrupt B.D.A officials work hand in glove with criminal elements & rowdies. They illegally
evict genuine allottees who are poor & without any connections from allotted prime lands & sell-off those prime land to the
highest bidder of bribe. The poor fellow is re-alloted lands in backward areas & in some cases left in the lurch.
Now , take the following case. Mr. S.D. chandrashekaraiah a poor old man aged around 80 years was allotted with house
no.185, kumaraswamy lay-out, first block, bangalore in 1978 vide letter no.
310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.
The chairman of B.D.A has allotted the built house on lease cum sale basis. The poor old man mr. S.D.chandrashekaraiah
complied with all the rules & in accordance with it even deposited 25% of the house cost in B.D.A'S account. However when
he went over to his allotted house for residing in it, he found out some rowdy elements were already residing there. He
complained about this matter to the legal owner of the house ie B.D.A . the B.D.A officials didn't take steps to evict the illegal
encroachers nor did they make any complaint to the police. His appeals to B.D.A, chief minister of karnataka , etc fell on deaf
ears. Hurt by this gross injustice & mounting financial burdens the poor old man died.
Subsequently, the poor man's daughter smt. Nagalakshmi who was also very poor , appealed to the B.D.A authorities once
again , to evict illegal encroachers from her father's allotted house. This time the corrupt B.D.A officials played a different
game. They showed her a vacant house, gave her oral instructions to live in that vacant house & told her that they will
regularise it in due course. The hapless poor woman took huge loans & repaired the house fit for occupation. Just before she
was to occupy that house , corrupt B.D.A officials once again planted rowdy elements in that house. Once again the poor
woman was cheated. She lost her house, on top of it her loan burden mounted.
Till date, that poor woman is suffering from these gross injustices of B.D.A . SHAMELESS B.D.A OFFICIALS who take
thousands of rupees salary & perks every month, all at the expense of tax-payer has not even cared to rectify the injustice.
Thereby, they are violating the poor woman's fundamental & human rights.
Hereby, e-voice urges the honourable chief minister of karnataka, honourable lokayuktha for karnataka , honourable
chairman national human rights commission , honourable chairman national commission for women & honourable chairman
state commission for women karnataka, to take the appropriate action & to speedily provide justice to this poor woman.
MLC alleges encroachment of 15,000 acres of forest land in Chamarajanagar District
After exposing alleged encroachment of large areas of land in Survey No. 4 of Kurubarahalli in Mysore, BJP MLC G. Madhusudhan has
come up with another exposure of about 15,000 acres of forest land encroachment in Chamarajanagar District. These lands were
encroached
by
private
parties
owing
to
an
order
passed
by
a
former
Deputy
Commissioner.
This
was
disclosed
by
MLC
G.
Madhusudan
at
press
meet
at
Pathrakarthara
Bhavan
here
today.
Elaborating on the issue, Madhusudan said The 15,000 acres of land covers Survey No. 1 in Palya Hobli of Kollegal taluk and Survey
No. 174 in Shivanasamudra forest area in Chamarajanagar district. In fact, Kollegal Assistant Commissioner, in an order passed
through the DC Court on Dec. 13, 2011, had reiterated that the said area was a government forest land. However the then DC M.V.
Savithri bowing to the pressure of a few vested interests had issued an order on July 8 stating that the said land was not a government
property which subsequently let in many private parties to encroach upon the land threatening the rich flora and fauna of the forest
region.
Continuing, Madhusudan said that any such important order should have come from the High Court. Hence he urged the government to
initiate a CBI inquiry into the case by cancelling the former DCs order and booking her for criminal offence.
Expressing apprehension that the forest land would become a haven for land mafia, he alleged that former Senior Police officials, rich
industrialists and influential politicians were involved in the deal. He, however, did not mention names.
Madhusudan said that he would submit a detailed letter to the Chief Minister enclosing the relevant documents to initiate immediate
action.
Referring to the scam of land at the foot of Chamundi Hill, Madhusudan said that he was happy that a departmental enquiry would
begin soon on the former Deputy Commissioner Vastrad who was involved in the issue.
BDA a den of corruption: T B Jayachandra

Author: BDA a Den of Corruption
o
o
Published Date: Jul 28, 2012 8:48 AM

Last Updated: Jul 28, 2012 8:48 AM
Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) has become a den of corruption and the government needs to take steps to check large scale
irregularities in the authority, said Deputy Leader of Congress in the Assembly T B Jayachandra.
Speaking on the demands on departments in the Assembly, the Congress leader on Friday urged the government to constitute a
House Committee to look into the irregularities.
The BDA has unlawfully de-notified hundreds of acres of land to help builders to form private layouts.
It is a big business involving hundreds of crore of rupees, he alleged.
He added that many people whose lands were acquired for developing layouts were made to run from pillar to post to get
compensation.
Many allottees have to run around seeking alternate site as in many instances after allotting sites to people the BDA de-notifies land,
he said.
Jayachandra said that during a recent visit to BDAs Arkavathy layout, he found a big building in the land meant for developing a park.
It is a 10-year-old project.
Now all that has come up there are buildings in the site meant for park and an IAS Officers House Building Cooperative Society.
BDA has allotted sites in bulk to the society.
Why is BDA selectively helping officers and not common people? he questioned.
Jayachandra said that former chief minister D V Sadananda Gowda had assured the House of ordering a probe by Corps of Detectives
(CoD).
Why the CoD inquiry was not ordered? Is the government trying to protect the corrupt? Everyone knows no work can be done in BDA
without paying bribe, he added.
According to him, will get `2 lakh crore if it regularises the illegal BDA layouts.
Many real estate agents are entering into politics and want to contest elections.
This is a big lobby and they can spend crores.
It is a scary trend and we need to stop it, he added.
MUDA LAND IS EASY GRAB !

RTI exposes 4-storey apartment built on MUDAs encroached land
Caption: RTI activist B.N. Nagendra

Mysore, Jan. 8- With the land value in city shooting to the skies, the land mafia continues to encroach upon vacant government lands
through dubious means. Despite the land-grabbers encroaching upon the government lands and building multi-storey buildings upon
them, the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) and Mysore City Corporation (MCC) authorities are sitting tongue-tied and
hands tied, which has further emboldened the land grabbers who are hand in glove with some unscrupulous officials to create fake
records.
It has come to light of late that fake documents were created for two MUDA sites in Chikkaharadanahalli (Aravindanagar) First Stage at
Chamaraja Mohalla, on which a four-storey building with 12 apartments have been constructed and all of them are occupied now.
The alleged fraud came to light after an RTI activist B.N. Nagendra, resident of Yadavagiri in city, sought information about the building
from the MUDA.
The two sites measuring 50x80 ft in Aravindanagar are close to Kuvempunagar. MUDA had formed the layout during 1988-89. At that
time, Sites No. 700 and 701 in Chikkaharadanahalli First Stage were not allotted to anyone.
In reply to the Nagendras query under the RTI provisions, the MUDA Public Information Officer replied that MUDA had no records or
documents to say that the said two sites were not allotted to anyone.
The sites were formed during 1988-89 and the building on it is eight years old. So, does it mean that the MUDA authorities were blind to
the encroachment all these years? Or, is it that they are not aware that the sites belong to the MUDA? Or, does it imply that they are
involved with the land-grabber?
The MUDA does not have records of allotment, possession certificate, sale deed, Khata-revenue letter or receipts for cash transactions
made. However, the City Improvement Trust Board (CITB) ledger shows the names of Chikkathayamma, resident of No. 818, New
Kantharaj Urs Road, Mysore, along with Mahadevamma, Lakshmi and N. Shivakumar, residents of No. 555 of the same address,
written by hand. The ledger shows that the two sites were purchased for a mere sum of Rs. 39,366 on April 4, 1988; the Khata and
revenue have been fixed based on this document alone. The building was constructed by getting the building plan approved in the
names of Mahadevamma and Chikkathayamma. The four-storied building is named as Shashank Paradise.
The site and building was inspected this morning by MUDA Superintending Engineer Shivakumar, Zonal Officer of Zone-1 Bhaskar and
other MUDA officials. The 12 families residing in the flats are now an anxious lot after realising that they have been cheated and they do
not possess relevant documents for the flats they purchased.
Some of the residents of the building whom SOM spoke to said that they had purchased the apartments based on sale agreements and
paid Rs. 25 to Rs. 35 lakhs in advance. They confessed that the low prices lured them to buy the apartments as the actual price in that
area was much higher. Each apartment has a master-bedroom, another smaller room, a living room, puja room, kitchen and a toilet.
Meanwhile, MUDA Commissioner S. Palaiah told SOM that he will investigate the matter and take suitable action.
Muda Land Encroachment: Criminal Case Booked against Housing Society President
Mysore, Sept. 20- In view of the allegation of encroaching 27 guntas of MUDA land close to Vijayanagar 2nd Stage, the Vijayanagar
Police have booked a case against the President of Sri Mahadeshwara House Construction Co-operative Society, R. Shankare Gowda.
A written complaint filed by MUDA Zone 4 Zonal Officer R. Rajashekhar yesterday, following which a case was registered by SubInspector Kumar.
The land is a portion of the land under survey number 120 in Hinkal, measuring 3.25 acres. Out of this, 1.16 acres of land was acquired
on June 20, 1974 under LAC 10. Remaining 2.09 acres was acquired by MUDA from one Puttathayamma through mutual agreement
on Oct. 31, 1985.
A 1.14 acre land was given to the Karnataka Water Board where a road and park have been developed. The remaining area lies
vacant, of which Shankare Gowda allegedly created fake documents to stake claim on 23 guntas of land in the name of the Housing
Society.
RTI activist B.N. Nagendra had sought information about the said land under the Right to Information (RTI) Act which brought to light
the alleged irregularity.
Response to MLA Vasus letter: Chamarajanagar MLA Vasu had written a letter to Urban Development Minister Vinay Kumar Sorake,
urging him to probe the irregularities in sites allotment, suspecting the involvement of some MUDA officials.
The Minister directed the Urban Development Department Secretary to probe the matter, who in turn asked the MUDA Commissioner to
submit a report regarding the allegations. A directive was issued to the DC too to probe the matter, following which a complaint was
lodged against the Housing Society President.
Bid to usurp MUDA corner site using fake documents
With the real estate prices in city skyrocketing, efforts to usurp sites and government land by hook or by crook are on too, despite
several precautionary measures taken up by the MUDA.
Here is an incident of a person trying to acquire a corner site in Jayalakshmipuram, measuring 110x120 ft, by not paying a single paisa
to MUDA but by merely paying Rs. 27,540 in an auction. The matter came to light when a citizen named B.N. Nagendra applied for
information under the Right To Information (RTI) Act. It is said that he took interest in digging out information about the site after an
acquaintance of his disclosed about the fraudulent deal.
Thanks to the efforts of MUDA Secretary Basavaraju who made meticulous investigations of the documents, the MUDA property worth
several crores was saved from being usurped.
The site is in Jayalakshmipuram, which was formed about 40 years ago. It is a corner site off the road leading to The Green Hotel on
Hunsur road. The site bears the number 23/A, having site number 23 towards the east, another site on the north and roads on the
western and southern sides.
The fraud was committed by Raju, 60, a resident of Paduvarahalli 2nd Main, Door No. 54. He is said to have forged the signature of
MUDA Zone 4 Special Tahasildar Devaraj and also used a duplicate rubber stamp for the fake documents.
The truth is that no auction was held for site no. 23/A. However, the accused Raju is said to have created fake documents that claimed
that he had purchased the site in an auction for Rs. 27,540 on Jan. 3, 1979. A title-deed for the site was prepared at Zone 4 office under
Form-2 (5) in Kannada dated Jan.2, 2013.
The site, for which fake documents were prepared in January, was registered three months later that is on Mar. 22, 2013, at 4.30 pm,
at the Sub-Registrars office in MUDA. It is said that the letter written by Special Tahasildar Devaraj to the Sub-Registrar to get the site
registered was also forged.
Soon after the fraudulent deal came to the fore, MUDA Secretary Basavaraju placed a signboard at the site four days ago, stating that
the land belonged to the MUDA. A complaint was lodged at the Lakshmipuram Police Station yesterday.
It is surprising that the title-deed for the site was prepared despite any auction conducted by the MUDA, no application submitted, no
notes written by the officials concerned and no entry made about cash payment. The Police have launched a hunt for the accused who
is at large.
MUDA employees booked for forgery, cheating
Mysore Urban Development Authorities (MUDA) have filed a police complaint against one P Nagaraj son of Puttaswamygowda and two
employees of MUDA staff who supported the accused in creating fake documents at Lakshmipuram police station.
MUDA commissioner C G Betsurmath said a site in Gokulam III stage was allotted to one M K Ranganayaki in 1973 through auction
and she had obtained title deed in 2002. But in the meantime, the accused Nagaraj has created fake documents about the site and
made the authorities believe that he had purchased the said land in 1979 in an auction. Later he has taken title deed for it and then sold
it to another party.
But the crime has come to light after the actual owner approached the authorities only recently. When the documents were verified,
MUDA authorities found that site number has been forged from 37 to 73.
The commissioner said the title deed of the said site obtained by Nagaraj has been cancelled and we are investigating on this score.
Krishnaraja subdivision ACP A N Prakashgowd said MUDA has given against three persons and we are investigating it.
Fraudster sells government land, dupes MUDA
The Mysore City Corporation almost lost a huge site because of the negligence of the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA)
before the fraud was discovered in the nick of time.
The accused Krishna had forged documents of 1.13 acres in Survey No 505 in Kesare village and sold it to one Parveez who started
constructing a building when it was stopped by MCC officials. The accused had even got an NoC to sell the land from MUDA, which did
not bother to find out the real owner.
Krishna is said to be a relative of the man to whom the land originally belonged before it was acquired by the erstwhile City
Improvement Trust Board (CITB) for civic purposes about 58 years ago.
Finding the land vacant for many decades, the accused created fake documents and tried to sell it.
Sources in the MCC said that after obtaining information through RTI about the land, Krishna, along with his relative Chennaiah,
obtained an NoC from MUDA and got the Khata made for the land from the taluk office by producing fake documents.
The property was registered in Krishnas name in 2009.
Krishna then sold the illegal property to Parveez in 2011-12. After realising that he had been cheated, Parveez filed a suit in court,
getting a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with his peaceful possession of the property.
Revenue Assistant Commissioner R Lokanath said that when he inspected the place, he found that Parveez had occupied the land and
even fenced the property that belonged to the Corporation. Upon questioning, he produced the clearances obtained from MUDA, Taluk
office and even the court.
After being alerted, MCC officials registered a land grab-cum-cheating complaint against Krishna and Parveez. They have even
approached court and the case is pending.
THE CLOUT OF LAND MAFIA IN INDIA -the governments daring to by-pass judiciary
An appeal ( PIL ) to the honourable supreme court of India
The recent attempts by government of India & other state governments to legalise land grabbings by enacting new land laws
in the name of public welfare is farce . while crores of people are without shelter & are living on streets , people in slums ,
tribal lands are struggling for land rights since decades the governments were mum & deaf. Now , as the rulers themselves &
their cronies have built illegal constructions running into crores they are shedding crocodile tears in the name of public
welfare. In india, various state governments have enacted " town municipal / city corporation laws & building laws" , to ensure
orderly growth of cities & towns , to ensure the safety of buildings & it's occupants , to ensure the safety of pedestrians &
road users.
Numerous educated people , ruling elite ministers , police , government officials , M.Ps , M.L.As , etc knowing fully well
about the laws have illegally built bungalows , commercial complexes , throwing to wind all laws. In their greed they have
shown utter contempt towards law. They have encroached dried up lakes , rivulets , rain flow paths , drainages , foot paths ,
civic amenity sites. In their building there are violations of- lack of fire safety exits , lack of parking space , encroachment of
foot paths , conservancy line , drainages , etc.
There is wide spread corruption in the corporation / municipal authorities. For a price officials have converted CA sites to
commercial purposes , authorised deviations / encroachments of public
lands like foot paths , drainages , parking space , set-off , etc. The corporation officials themselves are violating city master
plans. Even before authorising the conversions & encroachments of lands , the
corporation officials are not making alternate arrangements. By all these corrupt deeds many of the corporation officilas have
become millionaires . however more & more road accidents are taking place , building collapses & fire tragedies are occurring
, during heavy rainfalls water is getting clogged ALL THESE RESULTING IN LOSS OF HUMAN LIVE & PROPERTIES. In
recent days numerous murders have taken place over the real estate issues . THE CRIMINAL LAND GRABBERS MADE DEATH
THREATS & FORCED THE PIL APPLICANT IN THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ABOUT LAND GRABBINGS IN KORAMANGALA
LAYOUT BANGALORE. The government of karnataka instead of protecting the PIL applicant & upholding the law has taken
sides with the land grabbers.
The state governments of karnataka & delhi has got M.L.As & officials who have themselves violated building laws & grabbed
govt lands. Now , the two govts are contemplating to bring in laws regularising these land grabbing crimes for a pittance as
penalty. All to by-pass judiciary. The governments are least bothered about the lives of poor & only too caring towards the
land grabbing criminals. The same governments have not yet given land rights to poor slum dwellers / dalits , land rights to
tribals living in forest since centuries , land rights to poor agricultural labourers, where as it is full of concern towards rich &
mighty land grabbers criminals. Bottom line whatever be the magnitude of crime if you are rich & mighty law will be
bended to suit you , by bad luck if you are a poor folk you are bound to suffer being on the right side of law also. Hereby , evoice urges requests the honourable supreme court of india , to register this as a PIL , to provide protection to the PIL
applicant in bangalore & to take appropriate actions against the GOK & GOD nipping at bud their illegal motives to regularise
land grabbings.
Instead of answering our RTI questions , the officials are giving half truths , vague answers to our questions , some of
the serious questions they are not answering at all. Even Mr. P. Manivannan past deputy commissioner of Mysore District &
Chairman of MUDA , failed to uphold justice . He threatened me for asking truth , but he didnt answer the RTI questions.
Through media management he has cultivated a clean public image of demolishing man of illegal structures , whereas during
his time only some illegal structures were raised.
Due to Criminal nexus of Some MUDA officials Politicians Police , these illegal land grabbings are happening , the honest
among MUDA , POLICE & Politicians must raise to the occasion . They must save government land , first of all ask MUDA
Chairman / commissioner to answer the above RTI Questionnaire publicly.
Hereby , e-voice urges the concerned authorities , to answer the following questionnaire about BMIC project by NICE
http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?
Artname=20100214a_009101001&ileft=50&itop=56&zoomRatio=130&AN=20100214a_009101001
Hereby ,e-voice appeals to honourable supreme court of India , to annul the bid process of government of Karnataka with
respect to illegally occupied government lands & to annul this ordinance of government of Karnataka which seeks to legalize
land crimes. Jai hind . vande mataram.
Your's sincerely,
Nagaraja.M.R.
To,
Shri. Dr.Sindhe Bhimsen Rao . H ,
RTI APPELLATE AUTHORITY & CPIO ,
Additional Secretary to Chief Minister ,
Room No 236 , 2nd Floor ,
Vidhana Soudha , Bangalore 560001.
APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.
Please go through the some of actual criminal cases of land grabbings enclosed herewith.
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will
have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would
come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of
India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt peoples
representatives , police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned officials fall among the category of churchills men
Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters. To my previous RTI requests & appeals they tried covering up crores worth SCAM by
transferring application from one to the other at the end by denying information to me, Does not the Revenue department possess
information ?
We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME
WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE
INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT
YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING
PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC
INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC
SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE ,
ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE ,
PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
Main A :
1.
The land encroachments & illegal buildings and its continued existence since years is not possible without tacit ,
covert support of jurisdictional revenue officials. What disciplinary action has been taken against concerned officials with
respect to each case of land encroachment & illegal buildings , case wise ?
2.
If not , why ?
3.
Is not land AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME itself illegal ?
4.
Is not the move of government of Karnataka to legalise land encroachments & illegal buildings , in itself illegal ?
5.
Till date in some cases of land encroachers are evicted & some buildings violating building byelaws demolished , you
could have spared them to enjoy the benefit of land akrama sakrama scheme. Why you didnt spare them ?
6.
Is this scheme applicable for only chosen few ?
7.
Does this scheme also benefit rich people above BPL ?
8.
Does this scheme also benefit big land developers , land developing companies ?
9.
To my previous RTI appeals to MUDA , BDA only partial information was given , conveniently hiding the truth. Is it not
violation of RTI act ?
10. Does not hiding information about land crimes , in itself also a crime ?
11. I have shown in detail some land crimes in Karnataka. What action by government of Karnataka , casewise ?
12. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
13. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
14. Does not hiding a land crime , embolden land grabber to commit more land crimes ?
15. What action taken against BDA , MUDA & Revenue department officials who are covering crores worth land scams inspite of
my repeated appeals & RTI Requests ?
Main B : RTI QUESTIONS Mysore DC , COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) &
COMMISSIONER OF MCC ( MYSORE CITY CORPORATION ) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the mysore city's comprehensive city
development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by
MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site &
commercial site ? if not why ?
7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws no set off , no parking space ,
no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the
action status report yearwise ?
9. how much of MUDA's / MCC's / GOVERNMENT's lands , sites , buildings & houses have been illegally occupied by criminal
tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status
report yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just
through MUDA's / MCC's resolution instead of of reallotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting
list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?
12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal
occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?
13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing
societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since 1987 till date
?
14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies & illegal real estate firms ? if
not why ?
15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms & housing societies who have violated MUDA
norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc
keeping high in the mind safety of people first. MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the
building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators & legalizing those
violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally neglected by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT . When public people die ,
suffer injuries / accidents say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in
front of a business complex as the complex doesn't have a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to
come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents
, injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports
persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building
temporary huts , MUDA / AUTHORITIES with the help of police razes down those huts & evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when
cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA , MCC / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build big complexes earning
thousands of rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal
occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
yearwise figures ?
22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987
?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES recovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?
25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to bidders about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?
27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers & selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a
real estate agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands
belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole
villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by
MUDA MCC or other land developers ?
31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?
32. in & around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent
structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road.
The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out
advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the
movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under
& surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific
figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?
34. in & around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA & private developers , the sewage water generated in those
areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by MUDA , MCC & other developers , housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are
dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the
environment & creating public health hazard ? how the MUDA / MCC is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise
since 1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around mysore city ? what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against
them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .
38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non
agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands
to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB's
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?
40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA's / MCC's CDP & KIADB's industrial area development plan ? violations
how many ?
42. is the MUDA & KIADB revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers
& Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking ,
lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance to
MUDA's CDP ? if not why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after
purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government ,
banks , employees were cheated off their dues & the private firm made huge profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they
will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other
than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by MUDA , MCC or government in such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by MUDA , MCC & government
action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by MUDA , MCC or authorities , on what legal grounds ? ATR since
1987 till date ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC / REVENUE officials & their family members , who have land
acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn
the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public
auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease
period ?
Main C : RTI QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( BDA ) , COMMISSIONER ,

BRIHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE ( BBMP ) & CHAIRMAN , KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT
BOARD ( KIADB) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the Bangalore city's comprehensive
city development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site &
commercial site ? if not why ?
7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws no set off , no parking space
, no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what
is the action status report yearwise ?
9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings & houses have been illegally occupied by criminal
tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ?
provide status report yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal
occupation just through BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT ` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the same through public
notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why
?
12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal
occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?
13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing
societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since
1987 till date ?
14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies & illegal real estate
firms ? if not why ?
15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms & housing societies who have violated
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc
keeping high in the mind safety of people first. BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as
penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators & legalizing those violations. Safety of public & amenities of
public are totally neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents say
during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the
complex doesn't have a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in
accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to
renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
sites building temporary huts , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down those huts & evicts the poor
by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores
of rupees & build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or authorities not
even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double
standard by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till
date ? yearwise figures ?
22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise
since 1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT arecovered the rents earned by illegal
occupation ?
25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to bidders about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?
27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project
plan ?
28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers & selling it at a premium , by way
making profits just like a real estate agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands
belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole
villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquires such lands
to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other land developers ?
31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date
?
32. in & around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no
permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle
of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out advertisement spaces & built
permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of
electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under & surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other developers ?
specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?
34. in & around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & private developers , the
sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & other developers ,
housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are
dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the
environment & creating public health hazard ? how the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage / waste
disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around bangalore city ? what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .
38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non
agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands
to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given alienation of
land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB's comprehensive
industrial area development plan ?
40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such
lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT's industrial area development plan ?
violations how many ?
42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit
those real estate developers & Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking ,
lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance to
MUDA's CDP ? if not why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after
purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government ,
banks , employees were cheated off their dues & the private firm made huge profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they
will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other
than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT in such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ?
ATR since 1987 till date ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT officials & their family members ,
who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease
basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without
public auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry
of lease period ?
56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA allotment letter no: 310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt
11/08/1978.
57. why BDA didn't file police complaint to evict encroachers?
58. why BDA didn't inform the descendents of original allottee about the cancellation of their allotment ?
59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?
60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by the resolution of BDA committee legal ?
61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must have informed the original allottee about cancellation of allotment
allowing them sufficient time to reply with public notice in news papers , then they should have allotted the said house to the senior
most in the waiting list. But BDA has just allotted the house to an illegal encroacher by the resolution of BDA committee. Is it legal ?
62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request & stated that the said file concerning this issue cann't be found ie lost . is it legal ?
63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from the record room ? HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA
PLEASE REFER THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE.
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995 - 2015 .
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :

PIO , CHIEF MINSTERS OFFICE , GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA , VIDHANA SOUDHA , BANGALORE.
FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733464 for Rupees TWENTY only
DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.
PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)
The Art of Living Illegally
THE GURU of joy Sri Sri Ravi Shankar has been found guilty of encroaching more than five acres of government land
worth Rs 50 crore in Karnataka. The land meant to be distributed to the poor and landless has been illegally acquired by
Sri Sri, who has constructed an Art of Living meditation centre on it, violating the law.
Even though the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) wanted to fine Guruji and had asked for the demolition
of the building, a timely intervention by former chief minister BS Yeddyurappa has saved the Art of Living Foundation
from facing legal action.
According to documents obtained by TEHELKA, MUDA had acquired 100 acres at Alanahalli village near Mysore in 1985,
92 and 97 for the development of residential colonies for 1.5 lakh landless poor. Out of the 100 acres notified by MUDA,
70 were developed and the rest was denotified and restored to the original owners.
The land that Sri Sri acquired was left as a buffer zone and not developed as a residential layout as it allowed for the
free flow of water from Chamundi Hills to Alanahalli tank. It was supposed to be converted into a botanical park, says M
Lakshmana of the Association of Concerned and Informed Citizens of Mysore.
However, in 2002, the land was acquired by the Art of Living through a proxy by the name of R Raghu, even when the
land was in the possession of MUDA. And a building was constructed for conducting yoga and meditation classes.
Taking note of this, on 20 December last year, the then Deputy Commissioner of Mysore Harsh Gupta wrote to MUDA
directing it to reclaim the government land from the Art of Living, and sought a response within seven days. Following the
order, MUDA wrote to the tehsildar instructing him to serve a notice to Art of Living. The tehsildars office did so on 4
January, stating that the building constructed at Alanahalli was illegal and slapped a fine of Rs 1,000 on the organisation
as per the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.
Apart from this penalty, Art of Living was given two days time to demolish the building, failing which the department
would clear the encroachment and slap an additional fine of Rs 25 per day.
Shunted out of the deputy commissioners post, Gupta, now assistant director of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, says, During
my tenure, a survey was being conducted of the 1,500 acres of government land. And wherever discrepancies were
found, notices and orders were issued. During that survey, we found out that the Art of Living had encroached upon five
acres of government land.
Guptas orders were not carried out. The same day, a letter from the chief ministers office signed by Principal Secretary
ISN Prasad prevented the deputy commissioner and the taluka administration from carrying out its duties.
The letter instructed the district and taluka administration against demolishing the Art of Living building on survey No.
41/F block (P6) in Alanahalli, saying, The chief minister will take a decision on it. However, Yeddyurappa did not bother
to take any decision and the Art of Living continued construction activities on the land.
It was done to stop the precipitate action, says Prasad. An Art of Living delegation had met Yeddyurappa and he had
asked the district administration to refrain from action till a further decision is taken.
That didnt happen due to various reasons. But the current Chief Minister DV Sadananda Gowda will call a meeting with
all the local officials, says Prasad.
Responding to the claims, Karthik Krishna of the Art of Livings bureau of communication says, Since 2003, we have
been working to denotify this land that was falsely notified to extract a bribe, which we fought tooth and nail and were
also slapped with a fine.
The Art of Living has not encroached on any land, he says. The 5-acre plot was purchased by R Raghu from Gangu Belli
Belliappa on 25 November 2002. Since then, the premises have been utilised with the permission of the landlord for
conducting yoga and meditation classes, says Krishna.
This is not the first time a case of land-grab has been brought against the Art of Living, says Lakshmana. In Mandya
district, the organisation has been accused of grabbing 20 acres. And a 2006 report on government land encroachments
in the state had also found discrepancies in its Bengaluru ashram. In Mysore, apart from the five acres of government
land, the Art of Living has encroached around seven acres worth Rs 70 crore near the tourist spot of Chamundi Hills.
V Balasubramaniam, former chairman of Land Task Force, says the AT Ramaswamy Committee report had found that the
organisation had encroached upon 6.35 acres of government land in Agara village in Kengeri, Bengaluru. The committee
claimed that the land encroached by the Art of Living was worth more than Rs 8 crore.
Lakshmana has filed a criminal complaint against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and Yeddyurappa. I have also lodged a complaint
with the state Human Rights Commission, asking how a high-flying organisation like the Art of Living could obtain a site
when poor and landless people are waiting for the past 30 years, says Lakshmana.
YET ANOTHER MUDA SITE GRABBED

Mysuru, Mar. 26- In yet another case of land grabbing that has now come to light, a 50x80 site (No. 5491) in Vijayanagar second
stage, adjoining site No. 5490, which was allegedly grabbed by unscrupulous persons using forged documents (reported in SOM on
24.3.2015), too has been reportedly grabbed.
One B. Thimmappa, a resident of 9th main, Saraswathipuram, is alleged to have grabbed site No. 5491 measuring 50x80 located near
the water tank in Vijayanagar second stage, using forged documents.
The hand of unscrupulous MUDA employees is suspected in this case too.
MUDA Commissioner S. Palaiah, after coming to know of the fraud, has annulled the allotment letter, Sale Deed and other documents
pertaining to the site.
B. Thimmappa is said to have taken the site into possession under the Asha Mandira Scheme on 17.2.2003, with unscrupulous MUDA
employees allegedly joining hands with him in creating fake documents. Thimmappa later sold the site to K. Kantharaj and S. Vinutha
on 13.5.2010, with the khata transfer too done.
Later, Kantharaj and Vinutha sold the site to P. Gopal Rao, M. Ravishankar and Prabhushankar.
Thereafter, the buyers Gopal Rao, Ravishankar and Prabhushankar sold the site to one D. Diwakar, along with khata transfer. Despite
all these transactions taking place, the unscrupulous MUDA employees and the fraudsters have taken enough care to ensure that the
cheating does not come to light.
However, the fraud came to light when the documents came under thorough scrutiny of MUDA Commissioner.
With the grabbing coming to light, the authorities have erected a shed in a portion of the site.
The grabbing of a site adjacent to another allegedly grabbed site on which a building has come up, has caused concern amongst the
public, who are now left wondering on how to distinguish between genuine and fake documents. The MUDA officials are coming across
such site grabbing cases, even as they dig deeper into the mess.
Even as MUDA authorities are unearthing site grabbing case, MUDA Commissioner S. Palaiah has appealed the buyers to thoroughly
check the documents with MUDA for authenticity.
Meanwhile, Pooja Prabhakar, who claims to be the owner of site No. 5490 in Vijayanagar second stage, which was found to have been
grabbed using forged documents, during a scrutiny on Mar. 10, is reportedly all set to drag the MUDA to the Court over the issue.
Pooja Prabhakar is said to have cited a case where in a person is said to have allegedly built an unauthorised commercial structure on
an illegally purchased site and thus earning a huge sum of money after letting out the structure on rent/lease.
Illogical land laws fostering mafia, says High Court judge
Acting Chief Justice of High Court of Karnataka, Justice K Sreedhar Rao on Saturday said lack of logic in several laws,
including land reforms and acquisition laws, is encouraging land mafia, especially in urban centres.
The existing Land Acquisition Act is the greatest enemy of the common man. We have only encouraged land mafia through legislation,
he said, while addressing the National Consultation on Urban Poor and the Law, organised by National Law School of India University
(NLSIU) here.
Justice Rao said laws related to land need an overhaul, to ensure owners of the land get a share of development. The growth of real
estate mafias and skyrocketing property prices hindered average income earners from purchasing property. By creating mega cities, we
have done a great damage to the country, he added.
Justice Rao said various governments have failed to develop district and taluk head quarters as a result of which we are not able to
prevent migration to cities. Bangalore has developed as a cancerous slum. The urban areas are not having the infrastructure or
facilities to deal with this massive population inflow, he said. The judge also pointed out that the zoning laws often allow arbitrary
classifications without taking into account the real situations on ground.
P K Mohanty, Additional Secretary, Union Ministry of Housing and Poverty Alleviation, said the proposed law for property rights for
urban poor, to ensure spaces for street vendors, was under consideration and it would be soon placed before the Parliament.
A major issue that needs to be addressed is residency rights of urban poor in the context of vulnerabilities that they face. Though
several governmental programmes, specially JNNURM were designed for this purpose, there was a lack of sufficient response from the
States to avail the funds and use them in time, he said.
BMTF proposes, government disposes
Siddaiah was brought back to BBMP despite request for his suspension for his role in DLF case
Senior IAS officer H. Siddaiah, who returned as Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) Commissioner for a second stint, has
come under the scanner of the Bangalore Metropolitan Task Force (BMTF) as a suspect officer for his alleged role in the DLF case.
The BMTF, probing the DLF scam that involved illegal widening of a road to facilitate an increase in the floor area ratio (FAR) of an
apartment complex, had named Mr. Siddaiah, his predecessor Bharat Lal Meena, besides the former Bangalore Development Authority
(BDA) Commissioner Pradeep Singh Kharola among the three IAS officers whose role had surfaced during its investigation based on
oral and documentary evidence.
BMTF letter
In a letter to Chief Secretary S.V. Ranganath, dated November 29, 2012, the BMTF had sought to place under suspension these three
officials, besides 23 others of the BDA and BBMP, to facilitate fair probe.
However, the government chose to ignore the BMTFs recommendation and brought Mr. Siddaiah back to the BBMP from the Higher
Education Department where he was serving as Principal Secretary, thus replacing Commissioner Rajneesh Goel.
The report also names several senior officials of the BBMP and the BDA as suspect officials for having allegedly colluded to allow the
DLF to up the FAR for its projects, violating BBMP bylaws and BDAs master plan.
Charge against Shettar
Meanwhile, RTI activist Dinesh Kallahalli accused Chief Minister Jagadish Shettar of trying to hush up the matter by bringing back the
same suspect officials. He plans to seekGovernor H.R. Bhardwajs intervention in the matter as the Chief Minister was involved.
Speaking at a press conference here on Saturday, Mr. Kallahalli said Tirakana Goudar, Town Planning Member (TPM) in the BDA, who
was reinstated to his post while he was out on bail, was also being favoured by the Chief Minister.
DLF violations
The BMTF has arrested Mr. Goudar, who was charged with helping DLF Southern Homes legalise construction beyond what was
permitted on a civic amenity (CA) site. He was accused of approving the widening of the Hulimavu-Begur Road to legalise DLF
Southern Homes illegal construction.
DLF constructed 1,962 flats instead of the 440 for which they had taken permission. We are not even able to get documents under the
Right to Information Act. We want the Governor to intervene, Mr. Kallahalli said.
CCTV cameras in BDA are covered with cow dung
The government will cancel alternative land and sites allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) in prestigious
extensions in lieu of private land acquired for the development of Sir. M. Visvesvaraya, Kempe Gowda, Jnanabharathi and
Banashankari extensions.
Making an announcement in this regard in the Legislative Assembly, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah promised to order a probe into
alleged violation of norms and irregularities committed by BDA and punish the guilty.
Responding to a calling attention notice moved by S.T. Somashekar, K.N. Rajanna and K. Shadakshari of the Congress, Mr.
Siddaramaiah admitted that there were illegalities and irregularities in allocation of sites and land for the land acquired in BDA.
The government would order a probe into the scam and action would be initiated against those involved in it. He would direct the senior
officials to inquire into the misuse of incentive scheme of allotting land for land losers. Irregularities in revenue land scam would also be
probed and all allotments made under this category would be cancelled forthwith, Mr. Siddaramaiah said.
Detailing the allotment made by BDA since 2008, Mr. Siddaramaiah said that 3,314 sites had been allotted under the categories of
alternative sites, incentive schemes, land to land and revenue sites. The government will not spare anybody who has misused the
schemes in connivance with the officials, he said.
Initiating the debate, Mr. Somashekar alleged that BDA had flouted norms while allotting sites and land for acquisition of land without
notification.
BDA officials used the scheme to their convenience, which are meant for helping the poor farmers and land owners, he lamented.
Accusing BDA of generously giving sites and land to GPA holders in posh localities, Mr. Rajanna, alleged that the authority had not
followed guidelines and officials allotted sites and land at their whims and fancies. The close circuit cameras installed in BDA are being
covered with cow dung to gloss the murky dealings. It is scam worth Rs. 1,000 crore and needs comprehensive investigation, he said.
Violation of order
Pointing at the violation of Mr. Siddaramaiahs order, Mr. Rajanna said that, through the Chief Minister issued order against allotting
sites and land under the category on July 11, BDA allotted six sites on the same evening and issued possession certificates on July 13.
This clearly exhibits the uncanny knack of BDA officials to circumvent the directions of the Chief Minister and shows that BDA was
above government, he observed.
Reclaim 308 G category sites, says Padmaraj panel
BANGALORE: In a big blow to allottees of G category sites, the Justice B Padmaraj Committee recommended to the state government
it cancel and reclaim 308 sites allotted under the chief minister's discretionary quota. These sites in prime localities were allotted
between 2004 and 2011.
Three beneficiaries, who have already constructed houses, have been asked to cough up twice the current market price of the sites if
they want to retain them.
The panel has reserved its decision on two sites allotted to former CM DV Sadananda Gowda and BJP MLA DN Jeevaraj as their cases
are pending before the Supreme Court.
In all, 313 sites/plots were allotted under G category of BDA rules by previous CMs N Dharam Singh, HD Kumaraswamy and BS
Yeddyurappa. The beneficiaries included a present minister, MPs, MLAs, MLCs, political party leaders, bureaucrats, police officers,
doctors, journalists and even personal assistants, cooks, drivers and peons of powerful politicians.
In Mysore on Saturday, chief minister Siddaramaiah said he would study the report and take necessary action.
Based on a petition filed in 2010 by advocate Vasudev Murthy, the Karnataka High Court directed the state government to form a
committee to look into the matter and submit a report. Accordingly, the government constituted the Justice B Padmaraj Committee. By
then, many allottees who bagged these prime sites worth crores of rupees had sold their plots in the open market for 10 times that
amount.
Though the panel submitted its report on August 26, 2013, the government has dithered taking action. Though the issue was part of the
agenda in cabinet meetings, it was kept aside reportedly under pressure from the beneficiaries.
There are even allegations of beneficiaries influencing chief minister Siddaramaiah to bring an amendment to the Bangalore
Development Authority (BDA) Act, 1976 so that they can hold on to their sites.
According to BDA rules, a person who owns a site or a house in Bangalore is not eligible for allotment under the G category. But, the
majority of beneficiaries owned a site or house in the city. The committee report has pointed out that persons who gave a false
declaration on this count should forfeit their sites.
Some prominent allottees
Visveshwar Anantha Hegde Kageri (BJP)
Murugesh R Nirani (BJP)
MP Renukacharya (BJP)
Prahalad Joshi (BJP)
R Roshan Baig (Cong)
R Ashoka (BJP)
Sharan Prakash Patil (Cong)
Shakuntala Shetty (BJP)
MT Krishnappa (JDS)
M Srinivas (JDS)
G category site
Rule 5 of BDA (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984, lays out various categories under which it can dispose of stray sites. There are seven
categories: A (via auction), B (for sportspersons), C (for those who excel in arts, science, literature, education, medicine and public
administration), D (for ex-servicemen); F (for dependents of government servants who die in the line of duty) and G (for persons in
public life as may be directed by the government). While A, B C, D, E & F category sites are allotted on the recommendation of a BA
sub-committee, G category site allotments are the prerogative and discretion of the chief minister.
Who is eligible
* Domiciled in Karnataka for not less than 10 years
* Neither allottee nor family should own a site or house in Bangalore metropolitan area
* Allottee or family should not have been allotted a site or house by the BDA, or any other authority within Bangalore metropolitan area.
Allottee has to submit affidavit to this effect
Read articles on BDA :

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/keyword/bangalore-development-authority
Ex-MUDA chairmen feel heat over site scam
Former chairmen of Mandya Urban Development Authority (MUDA) are in a state of panic as the Urban Development Department has
sent a proposal to the Home Department seeking a CBI probe into illegal financial transactions and distribution of sites.
Ten days ago, the Urban Development Department had sent a letter to the Home Department seeking it to hand over the investigation
of the irregularities in MUDA and Ramanagaram-Channapatana Urban Development Authority to the Central Bureau of Investigation
(CBI).
The Police Department has already submitted the preliminary report to the court.
As money was invested in foreign banks, huge irregularities had taken place in the site allotment.
Urban Development Minister Vinay Kumar Sorake had provided details of the irregularities to the Home Ministry and requested them to
hand over the case to the CBI.
In 1998, the then irrigation minister K N Nagegowda had closed a lake (432 acres, 10 guntas) belonging to the department and handed
over 232 acres and 10 guntas to MUDA and 200 acres to the Housing Board for construction of houses for the poor and middle classes.
The then MUDA chairman P M Somashekar took a loan of `5 crore from State Bank of Mysore, Mandya branch, and through a
contractor from Andhra Pradesh developed Vivekananda Nagar layout with 2,600 sites in the 232 acres.
Later, when Asadulla Khan was MUDA chairman, 2,200 sites were distributed through lots.
When Hansiyabanu was MUDA chairman, under the Nimma Aayke scheme, 200 sites were distributed.
During the BJP government, MUDA chairman Vidya Nagendra had distributed 107 sites even be fore the final date for the submission
of applications.
This illegal distribution of sites was also discussed at the Vidhana Soudha.
Advocate T S Satyananda had lodged a case against three members of the Legislative Assembly and several others in the Mandya
Lokayukta Special Court for illegal distribution of sites. The government had directed the authorities to withhold the distribution.
Recently, financial irregularities of Rs 5 crore in MUDA and Rs 16.90 crore by the Ramanagaram-Channapatna Urban Development
Authority have come to light.
The local police investigated the case and filed a chargesheet.
The minister said: We have sent a proposal to hand over the case to the CBI. In a few days, with the CMs approval, the case will be
handed over.
Probe panel yet to scratch surface of MUDA irregularities
Its been a month since a high-level committee was formed to probe allegations of irregularities in land acquired by Mangalore Urban
Development Authority (MUDA) for Chelyar Layout. It is operational only on paper.
The grandiose plan of MUDA to form a layout and distribute sites to applicants at Chelyar and Madya villages near Surathkal comes at
a cost: Rs. 75,000 monthly outgo to service a Rs. 12 crore loan taken for it.
In an order sent by the Urban Development Department, on August 5, a committee was to deliver a report on the legality of the project
within 15 days. The committee is headed by Regional Commissioner (Mysore) M.V. Jayanthi, with Deputy Commissioner N. Prakash
and Deputy Director of Land Records B.K. Kusumadhara as members.
After allegations that the price paid for the land in 2008 was too high and favourable to private players, Minister for Urban Development
Vinay Kumar Sorake promised a probe in June.
The project envisaged buying 200 acres of private land at an agreed rate of Rs. 25,500 a cent. After the approval of the erstwhile BJPled government, nearly 73 acres of land had been bought.
Unscientific project
While most MUDA officials who talked to The Hindu claimed to have been transferred to the Authority only after site formation, one
senior official said: The entire project was approved by the State government. And so, in this respect, the papers are clean. However,
there is a need to ask why the ambitious layout was formed when the Authority was reeling under debt. Already burdened with a Rs. 4
crore loan, in 2008, MUDA took an additional Rs. 12 crore.
Many officials view the inquiry as a political witch-hunt: aimed at the now-out-of-power party, rather than the Authority itself.
Report soon
With not one meeting called so far, Mr. Kusumadhara said there was little clarity on the scope of inquiry.
However, the Deputy Commissioner said, We only have to clear the suspicions. We will collect the required documents, and present it
before the Regional Commissioner during her visit on September 12.
DLF-Robert Vadra controversy: LAND SCAM
http://www.livemint.com/Politics/bIyiB4vh8SxBgjy54H1BGP/DLFRobert-Vadra-controversy-A-news-roundup.html
LAVASA LAND SCAM

https://sites.google.com/?pli=1 ,
http://www.newsbullet.in/india/34/35975 ,
Probe into bogus bill scam will cover larger picture: BMTF
Bangalore: Attempting to clear the air on speculations regarding the alleged multi-crore bogus bill scam in three assembly
constituencies, Bangalore Metropolitan Task Force (BMTF) inspector general of police RP Sharma said the investigation will not be
restricted to Rajarajeshwarinagar, Gandhinagar and Malleswaram constituencies. The probe will also include other areas, he clarified.
Speaking at the BBMP head office on Wednesday, Sharma said even though the FIR filed on November 4 by the additional
commissioner (administration) pertains to only three constituencies, sleuths will look into other areas if necessary. "The C(TVCC) had
mentioned only three constituencies in its report pertaining to irregularities from 2008 to 2011. The FIR was only an instrument to take
up investigation, but it does not restrict us from taking up the investigation in other areas," he said.
Town planners' help to be sought

He said even though there is a delay in filing a case, BMTF is trying to clear all hurdles and expose those involved in the scam. The
BMTF has seized 153 files pertaining to the irregularities from the three constituencies. Eleven persons and TVCC officials were
interrogated and 153 files verified by sleuths in 20 days, Sharma said.
Reacting to a question raised on BMTF's ability to investigate financial crimes and demand to hand over the probe to the Lokayukta,
Sharma said the sleuths would seek help from town planners. Currently, there are only two town planners of the 15 sanctioned posts.
The investigation team will also include a superintendent of police, deputy superintendent of police (who will join the team shortly), two
inspectors, four sub-inspectors and 15 head constables. A fair and impartial investigation would be conducted by the investigation team,
he assured.
"We can ascertain the quantum of money that is involved in the scam only after the investigation," Sharma said.
BBMP commissioner Siddaiah entrusted the BMTF to carry out inquiry into the `1,539 crore scam after it was unearthed by the TVCC.
The BMTF is an autonomous agency under the state government. It is alleged that bills were sanctioned even though works were not
completed in the three assembly constituencies. The irregularities took place during the administrative period when BBMP remained
without people's representation. With no corporators, MLAs looked after project works in the wards. The elections to BBMP were held in
2010 after a gap of three years.
Last Friday, leaders of the ruling and opposition parties and civic officials participated in a two-hour meeting called by BBMP mayor R
Shardamma to discuss the probe. It was decided to set up a house committee, consisting of five ruling party corporators, two from the
opposition and two officials, to investigate the scam, before BMTF took up the case. The move was seen as a delaying tactic by the
ruling party in the BBMP council.RK Sharma, IGP, Bangalore Metropolitan Task Force, after a press conference at Bruhat Bangalore
Mahanagara Palike headquarters on Wednesday.
Bangalore: BMTF Registers FIR Against Suresh Kumar, Krishnaiah Setty
The Bangalore Metropolitan Task Force has registered an FIR against Minister for Urban Development Suresh Kumar, former Housing
Minister M Krishnaiah Setty and senior IAS officer V P Baligar for allegedly returning four acres 20 guntas of land, which was acquired
by the government under the Karnataka Urban Land Ceiling Act to construct houses for the slum dwellers at Laggere, to the original
owner.
The case was lodged based on a complaint by Dinesh Kallalli, a social worker, who stated that Kumar, in his capacity as Urban
Development Minister, granted permission to return the land to the original owner, while then Housing Minister Krishnaiah Setty halted
the process of constructing houses for the urban poor.
The BMTF has registered a case against the trio under Sections 13 (1) and 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section
157 of the CrPC on Saturday. Kallalli told Deccan Herald that in 1982, the government acquired 4.2 acres of excess land in survey
number 19/2, which belonged to K Gopinath to build houses for the financially weaker and downtrodden people. In 2003, the Karnataka
Slum Development Board (KSDB) started the process of constructing houses.
When the process reached the stage of inviting tenders, the Yeddyurappa government took the decision to return the land to the original
owner.
It is learnt that under the Karnataka Urban Land Ceiling Act, no one can hold more than 59 acres of land and the excess land should be
confiscated. Gopinath had reportedly possessed 4.2 acres in excess, which the government took it in its custody in 1982. Once the land
is in governments custody, it cannot be returned to its original owner, although the government has the power to allot it to other
individuals.
Kallalli alleged that the decision was taken to help Gopinath, who is the brother of senior RSS functionary K Narahari. He claimed that
the KSDB had objected to the decision, reminding that it was not only illegal, but would also affect the weaker sections of the society.
The board also said that the tender process was almost over.
However, the government set aside the objections of the KSDB and the tender process to construct houses. When contacted, Kumar
said he had no information about the case since he was away in Bellary. He said he would find out once he returned to Bangalore.
A few months ago, Kumar had tendered his resignation after it was alleged that his family was the beneficiary of a G category site.
However, the chief minister refused to accept the resignation as no substance was found in the allegation.
Setty, who was in jail over a land denotification case, is out on bail. Baligar is the Managing Director of Housing Urban Development
Company (HUDCO) in New Delhi.
When contacted Dr R P Sharma, Additional Director General of Police, BMTF was not available for comments.
JUDGES COVER-UP LAND SCAMS

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams
Muda Land Encroachment: Criminal Case Booked against Housing Society President
Mysore, Sept. 20- In view of the allegation of encroaching 27 guntas of MUDA land close to Vijayanagar 2nd Stage, the Vijayanagar
Police have booked a case against the President of Sri Mahadeshwara House Construction Co-operative Society, R. Shankare Gowda.
A written complaint filed by MUDA Zone 4 Zonal Officer R. Rajashekhar yesterday, following which a case was registered by SubInspector Kumar.
The land is a portion of the land under survey number 120 in Hinkal, measuring 3.25 acres. Out of this, 1.16 acres of land was acquired
on June 20, 1974 under LAC 10. Remaining 2.09 acres was acquired by MUDA from one Puttathayamma through mutual agreement
on Oct. 31, 1985.
A 1.14 acre land was given to the Karnataka Water Board where a road and park have been developed. The remaining area lies
vacant, of which Shankare Gowda allegedly created fake documents to stake claim on 23 guntas of land in the name of the Housing
Society.
RTI activist B.N. Nagendra had sought information about the said land under the Right to Information (RTI) Act which brought to light
the alleged irregularity.
Response to MLA Vasus letter: Chamarajanagar MLA Vasu had written a letter to Urban Development Minister Vinay Kumar Sorake,
urging him to probe the irregularities in sites allotment, suspecting the involvement of some MUDA officials.
The Minister directed the Urban Development Department Secretary to probe the matter, who in turn asked the MUDA Commissioner to
submit a report regarding the allegations. A directive was issued to the DC too to probe the matter, following which a complaint was
lodged against the Housing Society President.
d to usurp MUDA corner site using fake documents
With the real estate prices in city skyrocketing, efforts to usurp sites and government land by hook or by crook are on too, despite
several precautionary measures taken up by the MUDA.
Here is an incident of a person trying to acquire a corner site in Jayalakshmipuram, measuring 110x120 ft, by not paying a single paisa
to MUDA but by merely paying Rs. 27,540 in an auction. The matter came to light when a citizen named B.N. Nagendra applied for
information under the Right To Information (RTI) Act. It is said that he took interest in digging out information about the site after an
acquaintance of his disclosed about the fraudulent deal.
Thanks to the efforts of MUDA Secretary Basavaraju who made meticulous investigations of the documents, the MUDA property worth
several crores was saved from being usurped.
The site is in Jayalakshmipuram, which was formed about 40 years ago. It is a corner site off the road leading to The Green Hotel on
Hunsur road. The site bears the number 23/A, having site number 23 towards the east, another site on the north and roads on the
western and southern sides.
The fraud was committed by Raju, 60, a resident of Paduvarahalli 2nd Main, Door No. 54. He is said to have forged the signature of
MUDA Zone 4 Special Tahasildar Devaraj and also used a duplicate rubber stamp for the fake documents.
The truth is that no auction was held for site no. 23/A. However, the accused Raju is said to have created fake documents that claimed
that he had purchased the site in an auction for Rs. 27,540 on Jan. 3, 1979. A title-deed for the site was prepared at Zone 4 office under
Form-2 (5) in Kannada dated Jan.2, 2013.
The site, for which fake documents were prepared in January, was registered three months later that is on Mar. 22, 2013, at 4.30 pm,
at the Sub-Registrars office in MUDA. It is said that the letter written by Special Tahasildar Devaraj to the Sub-Registrar to get the site
registered was also forged.
Soon after the fraudulent deal came to the fore, MUDA Secretary Basavaraju placed a signboard at the site four days ago, stating that
the land belonged to the MUDA. A complaint was lodged at the Lakshmipuram Police Station yesterday.
It is surprising that the title-deed for the site was prepared despite any auction conducted by the MUDA, no application submitted, no
notes written by the officials concerned and no entry made about cash payment. The Police have launched a hunt for the accused who
is at large.
CID to probe Rs 6,697 crore KIADB denotification scam
Lokayukta directs the agency to submit a report within July 30

Irregularities to the tune of Rs 6,697 crore in land acquisition and compensation by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board
(KIADB) between 2006 and 2011 - the span of the BJP government - will be investigated by the CID. The land involved is a whopping
26,674 acres.
A petitioner, Jayakumar Hiremath, filed a complaint with the Lokayukta last August following a directive from the Karnataka High Court.
He had sought a CBI probe into the issue.
"The matter is now referred for a CID probe," Hiremath told Bangalore Mirror. "I welcome this. As the deadline is set now, it has set the
ball rolling into the probe."
In an order dated 29 May 2014, A C Vidhyadhar, additional registrar of enquiries (ARE), Karnataka Lokayukta, has referred it to the CID
with a July 30 deadline to submit a report on the case. ''Honourable Lokayukta has taken up the matter for investigation and
requisitioned your services under section 15 (3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act for a further investigation and report.
In this context, I would like to bring to your notice that under sec 15 (3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, the Honourable Lokayukta and Upa
Lokayukta can avail the services of any agency for the purpose of investigation. As the matter pertained to economic offences, the
Honourable Lokayukta has felt it is necessary to utilize your services for investigation," says the communication sent by the Lokayukta
to the CID, a copy of which is with Bangalore Mirror.
Karnataka HC summons MD of Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board
BANGALORE: Strongly observing that KIADB (Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board) has failed to ensure the benefits of land
acquisition reached the targeted groups, including farmers as envisaged in its schemes, the Karnataka high court has directed the
managing director (MD) of the board to appear before court on Friday.
A division bench headed by Justice K L Manjunath gave an oral direction to this effect while hearing a writ appeal filed by two persons
whose lands were acquired in 1996 for setting up a sugar factory at Kaliganahalli and Hattna villages of Bellur hobli, Nagamangala taluk
in Mandya district.
The bench also noted that the board has not been able to justify the acquisition as despite lapse of many years as the projects do not
start within the stipulated time and other allied conditions like providing jobs to land losers etc are not implemented.
Extension withdrawn
Meanwhile in a related development, a memo has been filed in court stating that two year extension granted in favour of M/s Prem
Sugar and Chemicals Corporation Ltd for setting up 5,000 TCD sugar factory with 32 MW co-generation plant has been withdrawn on
the ground that the company had misrepresented that there are no cases pending before court.
This order came to be issued after the division bench pulled up the authorities and even warned of contempt proceedings after it was
stated that two year extension was granted to M/s Prem Sugar and Chemicals Corporation Limited during the pendency of proceedings
before the court.
As per the terms of allotment of 86 acres of acquired land, M/s Prem Sugar and Chemicals Corporation Ltd should have operationalized
its unit within 36 months from 1996, by 2000.
Though the company got this period extended through a court order and the Board twice on its own extended the deadline, the
company has not even laid a foundation stone for its project despite passage of 16 years after allotment, the court had noted earlier.
CAG Finds Lapses in PWD, KIADB Works
The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India has come down heavily on the Public Works Department and the Karnataka
Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) for causing losses worth crores of rupees to the exchequer. The KIADB alone caused
losses to the tune of Rs.104 crore, it said.
The PWD had implemented road works in its Magadi sub-division in a fraudulent manner and the KIADB allotted land to three industrial
units at Narasapura Industrial Area in violation of rules, it said.
The report was tabled in both houses of the state legislature on Wednesday. It pointed out serious lapses by the chief engineer,
superintending engineer and executive engineer in implementing works worth Rs.250.62 crore in Magadi sub-division in Ramanagaram
district during 2011-12.
There was a total lack of monitoring and supervision by higher authorities during the course of execution of works although the SE/CE
were required to regularly monitor and supervise these works. Quality control reports were not available for any of the works claimed to
have been executed, the CAG stated.
The Internal Finance Advisor and secretary also failed to correlate monthly expenditure statements received from subordinate officers
with details of works in progress. The CE allocated grants to the extent of Rs.212.13 crore without prioritising works according to
prescribed procedures and did not submit any budget estimates to the government, the report said, indicting the department officials.
Total grants of Rs.250 crore were allotted for the Magadi sub-division 27 times the average grants released over the past three
years.
The grants were allotted irregularly by the Internal Financial Advisor and the CE, SE without obtaining a list of works. Fraudulent
payments of Rs.1.70 crore were made preparing fake bills, it said.
The entire work was split into 1,311 small works with each estimate below Rs.20 lakh to avoid competitive bidding. In 189 cases, more
than one estimate was prepared for the same work leading to fictitious estimates. Surprisingly, 891 of the 1,311 contracts were awarded
to just 3 contractors without even collecting the EMD and performance security, it said.
Check measurements were done on a single day by the department officials in 25 to 85 works and bills were paid without obtaining
quality control test reports.
It said surprise checks were not undertaken by superior officers.
The inspection team constituted by the department had observed irregularities and recommended recovery of the amount from the
contractors as works were neither executed nor identifiable during physical verification.
KIADB Land Fiasco
The CAG report on Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Boards allotment of plots at Narasapura Industrial Area at a subsidised
rate has exposed the loss of Rs.104 crore to the exchequer.
While the government had approved the allotment of undeveloped land, KIADB allotted 128 acres of well developed plots for three
industrial units at a concessional rate, thus resulting in a loss of Rs.104 cr. KIADB had incurred an expenditure of Rs.1.10 cr for
developing each acre of land.
Fresh panel to probe into irregularities in site allotment by Shimoga Urban Development Authority
The meeting of Shimoga Urban Development Authority (SUDA) convened here on Tuesday has decided to constitute a new panel to
probe the alleged irregularities in the allotment of sites in Atal Bihari Vajpayee Layout.
It may be mentioned here that Deputy Commissioner Vipul Bansal, who is also in-charge President of SUDA, had formed an inquiry
panel under retired Judge H.B. Ravindranath to probe the irregularities in site allotment.
The panel, in its report, had said that of the total 1,800 sites in the layout, 1,305 sites were allotted in violation of the law.
The committee had pointed out 22 different types of lapses in site allotment. Based on the report, Mr. Bansal had said that a complaint
would be lodged with the police against the persons indicted in the report.
In the meeting, R.K. Siddaramanna, MLC, said that it was not possible to initiate legal action against erring persons on the basis of the
report submitted by the probe panel.
He said that according to Section 9(2) of Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, only the president of an urban development
authority should head the panel that probes irregularities.
The meeting has decided to form a fresh panel under Mr. Bansal.
The sub-registrar of Shimoga and commissioners of SUDA and Shimoga City Corporation would be the members of the panel.
Meanwhile, Kallur Megharaj, managing trustee of Shantaveri Gopala Gowda Samajawadi Adhyayana Kendra Trust, has demanded a
CBI probe into the irregularities in site allotment by SUDA.
Earlier, Mr. Bansal had said that he would initiate action against the erring persons based on the report submitted by the panel headed
by Mr. Ravindranath.
Speaking to presspersons here on Wednesday, Mr. Megharaj alleged that Mr. Bansal haddecided to go for a fresh probe yielding to
political pressure.
Panel to be headed by Deputy Commissioner

Vipul Bansal
Sub-registrar of Shimoga and Commissioners of SUDA and city corporation to be members
Ambareesh Accused of Cornering 3 Sites
MANDYA: An individual is entitled only to one site from an urban development authority (UDA) in the state, but Housing Minister M H
Ambareesh allegedly got three large ones.
Recently accused of violating rules to get a site from the Mandya Urban Development Authority, Ambareesh allegedly bent the rules to
get sites in two other cities: Mysore and Bangalore. As an actor, Ambareesh rose to fame by frequently playing an angry, upright police
officer who takes on a corrupt system, earning the epithet Rebel Star.
RTI activist K R Ravindra said Ambareesh had procured the sites by submitting false documents. The sites are meant for the public.
The government should immediately take them back. Ambareesh should resign from his ministership on moral grounds, he told
Express.
Why Govt Sites?
Sites sold by government-run bodies like BDA are priced way lower than the open market. Ambareesh allegedly got sites from the
Mandya, Mysore, and Bangalore Urban Development Authorities. On January 16, 1986, Ambareesh got a 78X 50 ft site (No 1260) in G
and H Block Layout, JCST, Kuvempunagar, Mysore.
For Mysore Urban Development Authority records, he gave his residential address as No 172, II Stage, J P Nagar, Bangalore. He paid
`36,444 for the site.
Curiously, MUDA handed him the sale deed only on August 12, 2008, 22 years after he was allotted the site. In 1987, just a year after
he got a site in Mysore, Ambareesh got another from the Bangalore Development Authority. When he responded to an advertisement
offering plots in Sarakki II Stage, he was allotted, on July 28, 1987, a 120X80 ft site. He paid `93,639 for this one.
Woodlands Address
For BDA records, Ambareesh entered his residential address as 412, Woodlands Hotel, Sampangi Tank Road, Bangalore. How a hotel
address was accepted by the BDA authorities is a mystery. On March 6, 1999, when Ambareesh was Mandya MP, he again applied for
a site. He got a 50X80 site (now with House No 917) on March 23, 2002, under the MP quota. He paid `3 lakh for the site.
Halved and Sold
Later, the site was allegedly divided into two and one portion (25X80 ft) was sold to K Govindaraju, a resident of Mysore, for Rs 1.75
lakh. The other (also 25X80 ft) was sold to S Ajith, a resident of Hindavalu in Mandya taluk, for Rs 3.87 lakh. This sale also violated also
rules.
Section 12 (2) of the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities (Allotment of Sites) Rules of 1991 stipulates that any person who owns
a site or house in any part of the state becomes ineligible for another site or house from any authority or housing board in the state.
Efforts to reach Ambareesh failed.
Self-Housing Minister
Ambareesh allegedly owns three sites in violation of the rules:
Mysore: 78X50 ft, Kuvempunagar. Paid Rs 36,444.
Bangalore: 120X80 ft, J P Nagar (Sarakki). Paid Rs 93,639.
Mandya: 50X80 ft. Paid Rs 3 lakh. Divided it and sold it to two buyers.
Full-fledged CBI probe likely in Mandya site scam
Urban Development Minister Vinay Kumar Sorake on Tuesday said his department would look into the findings and merits of a
report by the Mandya Urban Development Authority (MUDA) commissioner K Mathai on the alleged irregularities and illegal
allotment of sites by the Authority.
We have received the report, but have not accepted it. We will send the report to the Home department for its perusal, Sorake told
reporters here. Sorake said the department had already handed over the initial case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The
department is handing over all the documents pertaining to the case to the CBI.
Whether this report also warrants to be handed over to the CBI is a decision which will be left to the Home department, he said. The
report, which was submitted on June 4 to the Urban Development department, speaks about a loss of Rs 300 crore to the State
government by way of illegalities under various schemes. The report states that the government has already handed over the case
pertaining to 107 sites to the CBI. Justifying the decision to hand over the case to CBI, Sorake said that the initial estimates of the scam
were to the extent of Rs 23 crore. The misappropriated amount was transferred to accounts outside India, primarily to Australia, said the
minister.
On Housing Minister M H Ambareeshs reported request to transfer Mathai from the present post, Sorake said that he had not received
any such request. But he has already been promoted and transferred to Bidar. Due to the Lok Sabha elections, the transfer was
withheld, said the minister.
Sorake said that the department was trying to strengthen the Directorate of Urban Development and streamline the site allotment
process in the City Corporations. He said that 50,000 sites in Mysore were remaining vacant, despite them being allotted to
beneficiaries.
Land mafia grabs Mysore Maharaja Srikantadatta Narasimharaja Wadiyar Bahadur's property
With the last scion of the erstwhile princely state of Mysore, Srikantadatta Narasimharaja Wadiyar Bahadur, passing away more than six
months ago, the real estate mafia is eyeing his properties running into crores of rupees, in the heart of the historical city of Mysore.
Astonishingly, two prime properties of Wadiyar were alienated just 3 days before he passed away (December 10, 2013) with the subregistrar's office even giving its approval. This prompted the late prince's widow Pramodadevi to seek a Lokayukta probe. Till recently,
the Wadiyar family members were not even aware of their land being usurped by the real estate mafia.
The net worth of Wadiyar's assets (spread across Bangalore, Mysore and Ooty) are estimated to be in excess of Rs.1,600 crore. He
also holds a share in the Bangalore Palace grounds, which is embroiled in a legal dispute after the Karnataka Government planned to
take over the same. It is not clear as to how many smaller properties the Wadiyar family owns but the land mafia's efforts, has shocked
the people of Mysore. Incidentally, both the illegal transactions were brought to the notice of the royal family by an NGO (Karnataka
Rajya Hindulida Vargagala Jagruta Vedike).
"It is unfortunate that illegal alienation of properties owned by the Maharaja's family is happening in the CM's hometown. He has agreed
to look into the matter and directed the authorities concerned to take up the issue. Hopefully, the Lokayukta should be able to end this
menace," said Vedike's president K.S. Shivaram.
Mysore Lokayukta SP S.M. Jagadish Prasad said a probe had already been ordered into the two land transactions and that the
properties would be restored to the Wadiyars.
In the first incident, a prime property belonging to the Wadiyars near the Mysore Mall was sold, as if the late prince had given his
consent on December 7, 2013 (just three days before he died). The police have arrested two real estate agents and the sub-regitrar
concerned.
In the second incident, again on the same day (December 7), another prime property (1.5 acres) was alienated in favour of 70-year-old
Siddamma, a gardener in the palace. Apparently, it is shown in the sale deed that Wadiyar granted the land to Siddamma as a gift.
"On December 7, 2013, the late prince was in Bangalore. There is no way that he visited the subregistrar's office to sign the sale deed
documents. This is a clear case of forgery. We need to examine all the transactions to detect such cases," said Shivaram.
According to him, the real estate mafia has fenced three other prime properties owned by the Wadiyars in Mysore.
Siddu Govt Illegally Denotified 707 Acres, Alleges BJP

The BJP has accused the Siddaramaiah government of illegally denotifying 707 acres of land in the Arkavathy Layout by flouting High
Court guidelines.
This is 166 acres more than what Opposition Leader Jagadish Shettar had mentioned when he raised the issue in the Assembly in July.
Shettar had alleged denotification of 541 acres.
The committee, set up by the BJP to unearth alleged illegal denotification in the layout, and comprising party legislators S Suresh
Kumar and V Somanna, on Thursday submitted a 12-point report to party president Prahlad Joshi.
The report says the scam was perpetrated by exploiting the High Court direction to review all complaints of irregularities in land
acquisition.
Huge tracts of lands have been denotified by marking the note redo on these files, making it the new term for denotification in the
Siddaramaiah government, the BJP said.
The Siddaramaiah government has committed a huge scam in which thousands of crores have changed hands and huge tracts of land
have been acquired by big builders and developers. The entire deal was done just ahead of the recent Lok Sabha election, Joshi told
reporters.
Joshi and Shettar, who first raised the issue during the last Assembly session said, It is just the interim report and a more
comprehensive, explosive final report would be submitted in January 2015. The state BJP leadership will seek advice from legal experts
and decide on its next course of action in the next two weeks.
BJP, which has not accepted the Justice Kempanna Commission on alleged denotification of land, is contemplating a legal fight and is
expected to approach Governor Vajubhai Vala seeking his sanction for prosecution of the Chief Minister. Meanwhile, it may launch an
agitation to maintain pressure on Siddaramaiah.
Shettar said there was no question of giving up and the issue would be taken to its logical conclusion as the government has
committed huge irregularities. Of the 707 acres denotified by the Siddaramaiah government, Special Land Acquisition Officers has
recommended denotification of 390 acres during the Shettar regime. However, I did not approve it when I was the Chief Minister. The
Siddaramaiah government has denotified 707 acres, including the 390 acres, Shettar said.
The BJP released a report on illegal denotification of land in the Arkavathy Layout by the Siddaramaiah government.
The Charges
The HCs six-point guidelines state that denotification could be considered only if: the said land comes under the Green Belt Area, if
the land has already been built up, if the land has been released for charitable trusts, if there is a nursery on the land, if any industry
has come up on the land and if the land is contiguous with the above categories, based on the status of the said land as in 2003.
For instance, 54 acres of land has been denotified in 2014 ignoring the report of officials who studied the status of the land and had
stated that it cannot be denotified. The BJP report says that the land has been denotified flouting the HC guidelines as it involved a deal
of hundreds of crores.
In a midnight move, 52 acres was denotified without considering any of the guidelines set by the HC based on the only reason that
the BDA had received an application seeking denotification.
BDA, which had filed an affidavit in the HC to continue land acquisition in Kempapura and Sriramapura villages, later violated its own
commitment and denotified huge tracts of land in these two villages after passing a resolution.
The BJP report has also suspected malafide intentions in denotification of 20 acres of land in which Tata Housing had shown keen
interest.
Utter confusion prevails after denotification of land on which Khadi Village Industries Board had allotted sites for about 200
applicants, as there is no clarity on whether the land has been denotified in
favour of the farmers or the board.
About 300 site allottees in Arkavathy Layout are left in the lurch as the lands on which their sites have been developed have also
been denotified.
Who encroached Bengaluru?
For 11,595 lake encroachers in Bengaluru Urban and Rural districts, February 29th is the deadline. They can submit their grievances or
objections in response to the notices served to them by revenue officials, on encroachment. Though this date may be extended for a
few more days, not much time is left for those who wish to communicate their version to the committees headed by tahsildars of
respective taluks. This also gives a chance to those who have information on encroachments to share it with the committee.
A 11-member Committee of the Legislative Assembly headed by K B Koliwad, Ranebennur MLA and Legislative Assembly Committee
chairman, had recently declared that prominent developers are major encroachers of tanks and tank beds in Bengaluru. The statement
was based on a physical survey conducted by the Directorate of Survey, Settlement and Land Records in Karnataka. The Committee
had also visited several lakes in the city and verified documents from BDA, BBMP and Lake Development Authority. According to the
survey by the Directorate of Survey, Settlement and Land Records: Total encroachment in Bengaluru Urban and Rural districts: 10,472
acres Encroachment in Bengaluru Rural : 6,195 acres. Encroachment in Bengaluru Urban is 4,277 acres. Encroachment by private
parties: 7,185 acres Encroachment by government parties: 3,287 acres. Encroachment in Bengaluru North : 1,171 acres - highest in
Bengaluru Urban. Encroachment in Hoskote:3,113 acres - highest in Bengaluru Rural
The committee has been issuing show-cause notices to the encroachers to give them a fair chance to submit their version. Koliwad
committee will prepare their final report based on inputs to the data that has been shared now. K B Koliwad informed Citizen Matters
that as per the system of natural justice, the Committee decided to give an opportunity to the lake encroachers to submit their
objections or grievances. Their responses will be examined and scrutinised by the committees headed by jurisdictional Assistant
Commissioners. The Committee, while verifying the claims made by encroachers, will also do spot inspections after March, if the need
arises. Based on the reports submitted by ACs of various sub-divisions, the Legislative Committee will prepare the encroachment report
and submit it to the legislature, along with recommendations, Koliwad said.
He added that the last date for responding to notices which has been currently set as February 29th, could be extended for a few days,
as the government officials are now busy with panchayat elections and are unable to attend to the encroachment issue. People can
also share information on encroachments, with the committee. Some of the prominent private and government encroachers listed in the
survey report are:
Private: Harmony Developers, Divyashree Tech Park, St Anns Junior College (KR Puram), Bagmane Developers, Garden City College
Bhattarahalli, National College ground, NICE Road, Shobha Developers, SV Lake View Apartment, JSS High School, Prestige Group of
Companies, SLN Public School, Aishwarya Apartment, Oberoi Group, Garden View Apartment, Adarsh Developers, Prestige Group, N
D Developers apartments, Sriram apartments,
Government: KIADB, BBMP, Kempegowda Hospital and College, BDA, KSPCB, Slum Board, Education department (various
government schools), Railway department, Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd, Karnataka Housing Board, Forest Department,
International Airport Authority (for Kempegowda International Airport), various road departments, Indian Oil Corporation, Horticulture
Department, BMTC, DRDO.
The survey report with the list of encroachers is available
here: http://www.kla.kar.nic.in/assembly/commhc3/bangalore_urban_rural_tanks_report_11012016.pdf
All builders have encroached land: KB Koliwad

House committee points to real estate big players for allegedly encroaching city lakes.
Legislative Assembly Committee chairman and senior Congress MLA K.B. Koliwad at a press conference on lake encroachments and water bodies
in Bengaluru Urban and Rural districts
Bengaluru: House Committee on Tank Encroachment and Rejuvenation, Chairman, K. B. Koliwad on Friday named many big names in
the real estate sector for allegedly encroaching lakes in and around city. The names include Sobha Developers, Brigade Group,
Prestige Group, Adarsh Developers, DS Max Group, Bagmane Tech Park, among others.
The committee has not even spared government agencies such as Bengaluru Development Authority and BBMP, as these two
agencies are major encroachers among the government departments. Both private and government agencies together encroached
10,472 acre, while various government agencies have encroached 3,287 acres and private builders, including slum dwellers, have
encroached 7,185 acres in the city.
According to the Committee the encroached land value is estimated at more than `1.5 lakh crore. Doresani Palya Lake was encroached
upon by the BDA and developed as a layout with sites allotted to Assembly Speaker Kagodu Thimmappa and Chief Minister
Siddaramaiah himself. Though Mr Thimmappa retained the site, Mr Siddaramaiah sold his site sometime back.
Mr Koliwad told reporters that the IT boom contributed to the greed of these private builders and this led to the encroachment of lakes in
and around the city.
During our investigations it was revealed that several forged documents were fabricated within no time to aid these encroachments,
he said.
According to him, Bengaluru Urban and Bengaluru Rural districts together had 1,545 lakes, 2,000 small water bodies and rivulets,
which measured around 3,000 acres. All in all 11,595 encroachment cases have been identified, which not only include government
agencies or private builders but even slum dwellers. Therefore we have issued show-cause notices to all 11,595 people, including
builders and common people involved in these alleged encroachments. The last date for them to respond to our notice is by the end of
this month, he said in response to a question.
After obtaining the reports, the committee will give a final report within three months. The committee is likely to recommend seizure of
the assets of officers involved in lake encroachments.
The disclosure of names of big realtors and details of encroachments during the press conference on Friday raised questions rather
than clear the doubts. Generally, the House committees do not hold press conferences before submitting the final reports to the
Speaker. On Friday, the committee did not give an interim report or the final report to the Speaker. One of the members, who refused to
come on record told Deccan Chronicle that the committee wanted to wipe out the negative campaign being spread against the
committee that it was doing nothing. Fridays press conference was an attempt to clear this, he said.
The synopsis circulated among the media did not have any details of companies that allegedly encroached upon tank beds. However,
details were orally shared. This raised question as to why such critical information was not shared. The sudden disclosure ahead of the
crucial elections to taluk and zilla panchayats may raise many questions about the political ramifications and the future actions involving
this information.
We will prove our point: Suresh Hari, secretary, CREDAI

The Koliwad Committee may have released a survey report, but who knows the basis of this report? The findings of the report are
subject to interpretation and have their own issues. At the end of the day, who has sanctioned the buildings and who has verified the
title? These are all the acts of the state government and its agencies and we have nothing to worry about. We have procured the land
legally, and if the Committee says some of the buildings are on encroached land, we have to remember that its not the builder who
encroached upon it. We will ensure that the safety of property owners is protected by the association and its builder-members. We have
time and again said that our properties were constructed with due diligence. Let the Committee prove that our properties are
constructed on encroached land and if it says we are wrong, we will prove our merit and show them we are right. The state government
is waking up now and saying that some of the layouts and apartment complexes are constructed on encroached land -- this is nothing
but harassment. However, having said that, CREDAI feels its a challengeable report given by the Committee.
Shut down BDA: Ashwin Mahesh, Urban planning expert
The K.B Koliwad Committee has said that the BDA has allotted 65,000 sites on encroached lake beds and over 3,287 acres of land has
been encroached by the government bodies itself. Now, what the Committee does not tell us is how these bodies and officials
concerned went about the encroachment. The problem is the BDA is both the planning and implementation authority. When the BDA
itself is the judge, to decide what job has to be done and how good the job is, where is the question of quality? There are no strengths,
skills or trust to the works carried out by the BDA. The solution to this would be in shutting down the BDA. Or at least, it should no
longer acquire land but should get involved in infrastructure development. The magnitude of land encroachment and irregularities is so
massive that though there are right solutions, they cannot be implemented. Punishment for encroachments cannot be inflicted in
accordance to the scale of the encroachments. How can we punish the British for colonialism? The officials who let the encroachments
happen have retired and they will say it was not their fault. Maybe we can move the court and the BDA can be penalized. But theres no
way to inflict punishment to the scale of encroachments. The BDA has become a broker agency and it understands that more brokering
brings more income. Its earning its revenue from brokerage and this has to be put to an end.
Demolish all encroachments: V. Balasubramanya, former chairman, Special Task Force
Whether buildings on lake beds have been constructed with governments consent or not, all illegal buildings have to be demolished.
For instance, in Maharashtra, the High Court ordered that encroachments on the banks of the Mithi River have to be demolished and
the court order was followed accordingly. Despite land rates being higher in Maharashtra, the encroachments were razed. So, there
should be no excuse in Bengaluru; no yielding even to the claims of innocent builders. The individual plot owners should have known
that the BDA is a corrupt organization -- when buying plots from them, they should be extra cautious. Theres a legal principle called
buyers beware and this should have been followed by individual plot owners. If the state government starts regularizing layouts under
the pretext of humanitarian grounds, there will be no end to such regularisation. And getting permissions from government agencies
even for an illegal plot is not a tough task any more. If all the violations are regularized in the city, one day, people will have to be
evacuated as Bengaluru will start flooding due to the absence of lake beds. Private builders will be aware of the violations and there
should be no question of regularizing any layouts or constructions, even if its sanctioned by a government agency.
Public consultation next step: Suresh Kumar MLA, member of Koliwad Committee
We have the data for over 4,000 lakes and the Committee members visited 19 lakes in the city. Interestingly, during our survey, it came
to our notice that many lakes have dried up 25 years ago and theres no way water will accumulate in these lakes again. The
Committee is in a fix whether such lakes should still be considered lakes or whether we should allow the layouts to flourish. In the first
step, we have released the findings of the survey report and we are yet to tackle the issue of layouts that were formed by the BDA.
Since BDA is a government agency, owners who have brought plots from the BDA must be rehabilitated. We have held detailed
discussions with the revenue department officials regarding this, and now the officials have been directed to hold public consultations in
order to gather objections, feedback and opinions from citizens. Meanwhile, we have also instructed the Revenue department to look
for alternatives. We are trying to find out feasible solutions to decide the next course of action.
Brigade Group denies allegation
The Brigade Group has strongly denied the report alleging that it had encroached a lake. The realty firm said it was a mischievous and
motivated report. As a responsible real estate developer of repute for over 29 years, Brigade group has been taking great care to save
lakes and conserve the environment. In fact, as part of our CSR Initiatives, Brigade Group has recently rejuvenated 24 acres of
Sitharampalya Lake in Whitefield, the company said. We also wish to inform you that Brigade Group recently won two national awards
instituted by CREDAI India for its Corporate Social Responsibility. We won the Environmental Impact Award for the rejuvenation of the
Sitharampalya Lake in Whitefield and the redevelopment of the Sangolli Rayanna Park in Malleswaram and the social infrastructure
award for the redevelopment of the Sri Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Playground in Malleswaram and the Skywalk with escalator across
Dr. Rajkumar Road in Rajajinagar, the company added
DECLARATION
Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R.
Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP

WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017 INDIA
Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S - e Clarion Of Dalit
Periodicity : WEEKLY
Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB
Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .
Monetary Gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.
Owner/Editor/Printer/Publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.
Nationality : INDIAN
Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated to JSS Medical College , Mysore
( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be handed over to JSS
Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of medical students.
Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of
either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate
eye transplantation to the needy.
Home page :
http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in/ ,
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,
http://paper.li/f-1367938674
UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479

Cell : 91 8970318202
individual are not covered under PIL, however an individual an activist who is fighting for public causes suffering injustices as a result of his struggle ,caused by
powers that be to silence him can club his individual case under the public causes (PIL ) he is appealing.
Nowadays people of questionable character , integrity are being selected to public posts , end result is present day india. In the following web sites I have shown
few actual cases of crimes by judges & police , just imagine what type of justice common man gets.
Crimes by Khaki
Police show full bravery , courage , use full might of law while acting against innocents , commoners. Even takes suo motto action. Frequently crosses legal limits
while acting against commoners like 3 rd degree torture , arrest / search , seizure without warrant , arrest in mid night , etc . While they are supposed to take action
against rich crooks , their own corrupt colleagues no suo motto action , delayed action inspite of complaint allowing time for rich crook to get anticipatory bail , no
3rd degree torture on him , no arrest , search , seizure without warrant. Where is the bravery , courage of police ?
Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid law book while judging cases of commoners , take suo motto action where as cases involving rich crooks comes before
them inspite of repeated PILs they dont consider it , let alone take suo motto action. Judges make far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting the rich
crook. Where is the wisdom of Judges ?
I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else
where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the
police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits , rich crooks ,
criminals even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating
agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper
medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake
charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.
Powers that be , higher ups have referred all my previous cases to police although in most of the cases police dont have jurisdiction over it. It sends a subtle
message by police force to the complainant to keep silent . In the remaining cases which are under their jurisdiction police dont act against higher ups , high &
mighty. In such cases police lack practical powers , their hands are tied although they are honest. As a end result , police have repeatedly called me to police
station number of times ( have never called guilty influential persons even once) took statement from me and closed the files. Hereby , I do make it clear the
statements made by me in my original petitions , PILs , news papers , etc while I was in a free & fair atmosphere are TRUE , over rides , prevails over
all the statements made by me before police earlier and which will be made by me in future before police.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward
happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be
responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by
the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears
from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants & Constitutional functionaries.
date : 03.01.2017..Your's sincerely,
place : India...Nagaraja.M.R.
edited , printed , published & owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE ,
LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL ,MYSORE -570017 INDIA
cell : 91 8970318202
home page:
http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in/ ,
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,
http://paper.li/f-1367938674
Follow me at
http://www.facebook.com/people/Nagaraj-Mysore-Raghupathi/513253184 ,
http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw ,
http://twitter.com/naghrw ,
http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw
A Member of Amnesty International

RTI Murder MUDA BDA

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

RTI Murder MUDA BDA

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

S.O.

S e - Clarion Of Dalit - Weekly Newspaper On Web

Why NOT demolish illegal buildings of Ministers

PIL Land Mafia , Judges & RTI Activist Murder

Dated : 01st January 2017 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

RTI ACTIVISTS MURDER : POLICE DETAIN 6 FOR QUESTIONING

RTI activist Srinath

Based on definite tip offs and complaints from

Are Karnataka HC Judges favoring Land Mafia ?

Law is one & same for all.

10. If comes what criminal action against the concerned officials ?

Why MUDA , BDA officials and Public Servants NOT Answering ?

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

Is not land AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME itself illegal ?

Is this scheme applicable for only chosen few ?

Does this scheme also benefit rich people above BPL ?

since 1987 till date ?

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995 - 2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733464 for Rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

PIL Land Mafia and Judges

Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others

Dated : 23rd July 2015 .FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,

UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479

date : 01.01..2017..Yours sincerely,

Editorial : JAIL the Police & Judges

Traitors in Judiciary & Police

Why NOT Demolish Ministers illegal Bungalows

Infosys SAVE Hebbal Lake in Mysuru from Land Mafia

To preserve lakes Government of Karnataka must :

First conduct survey of sites / lakes , clearly marking the encroachments.

Evict the encroachers & initiate legal prosecution against them.

Save Hebbal Lake Save BEML Quarters Lake in Mysore

An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India

Hereby , we request the honourable Supreme Court of India ,

To evict all encroachers forth with .

Top companies in Byrasandra lake encroachers' list

Judicial Layout Site Allotment BRIBE TO JUDGES ?

Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.

Sign to Save Hebbal Lake & BEML Quarters Lake in Mysore

AKRAMA SAKRAMA / REGULARISATION OF ILLEGAL LAND ENCROACHMENTS ILLEGAL LAND CONSTRUCTIONS

Rewards for illegalities , crimes if one is rich.

Punishes , demotivates honest law abiding citizens.

Total disregard to safety of people in those illegal buildings .

Bangalore Rural DC Aiyappa, three revenue officials held

NICE Corridor Questions to former CHIEF MINISTER .Mr.Yediyurappa

LAND SCAM IN TAMILNADU One for my officer, one for my boy

PLOT NO: 1047, MOGAPPAIR

GDQ is a way of making you part of the syndicate

Plots are allotted even

Ministers DQ proves judges are more corrupt than civil servant

Mysore DC indicted for illegally delisting Rs 6k crore land

DC Vastrad yielded to real estate lobby: MLC

ILLEGALITIES IN AUCTION OF M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD MYSORE

LAND MAFIA IN KARNATAKA

Hereby , e-voice urges the govt of karnataka & other authorities ,

5. To impartially act against illegal occupiers rich or poor.

13. To ruthlessly prosecute the corrupt officials & ministers.

ILLEGALITIES IN BANGALORE-MYSORE EXPRESSWAY PROJECT BMIC by NICE

In this mysore-bangalore 4 lane expressway project, following inconsistencies are there,