Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and
Ecosystems
“Business simply cannot The MA classified ecosystem services, the benefits people and businesses obtain
function if ecosystems and
from ecosystems, into four categories:
the services they deliver –
like water, biodiversity,
Provisioning – goods such as food, water and fiber;
food, fibre and climate
regulation – are degraded Regulating – biophysical processes controlling natural processes;
or out of balance.” Cultural – providing recreational, aesthetic or spiritual values;
Supporting – underlying processes such as soil formation, photosynthesis and
Björn Stigson, nutrient cycling.
President, WBCSD
This Issue Brief explores the six challenges, discusses their implications for
“Business cannot assume
businesses and provides examples of corporate responses.
that there will be ample
warning of a change in
the availability of key The business case
services or that a Business and ecosystem services are inextricably linked. Corporations not only
company’s past affect ecosystem services but also rely upon them. For instance, the
responses to changes pharmaceutical industry benefits from nature’s providing genetic resources;
will be successful in the agribusiness depends on nature’s pollination, pest control and erosion regulation
future. Ecosystems often services; while tourism builds on cultural services, and the insurance industry
change in abrupt, benefits from the natural hazard protections that some ecosystems provide.
unpredictable ways.” Because of these inter-relationships, the trends and six challenges identified by the
Ecosystems and Human Well-being:
MA pose significant risks to companies (as well as to their suppliers, customers
Opportunities and Challenges for and investors) including:
Business and Industry, 2005
Operational – increased scarcity and cost of raw materials such as freshwater,
disruptions to business operations caused by natural hazards, and higher
insurance costs for disasters such as flooding;
Regulatory – emergence of new government policies such as taxes and
moratoria on extractive activities;
Reputational – damage to corporate reputation from media and non-
governmental organization (NGO) campaigns, shareholder resolutions and
changing customer preferences;
Access to capital – restrictions as the financial community adopts more
rigorous investment and lending policies.
2
At the same time, these trends and challenges can create new business opportunities including:
New technologies and products – that will serve as substitutes, reduce degradation, restore
ecosystems or increase efficiency of ecosystem service use;
New markets – such as water quality trading, certified sustainable products, wetland banking and
threatened species banking;
New businesses – such as ecosystem restoration and environmental asset finance or brokerage;
New revenue streams – for assets currently unrealized, such as wetlands and forests, but for which
new markets or payments for ecosystem services could emerge.
However, most companies routinely fail to recognize the link between healthy ecosystems and their
business interests. Companies can pursue several steps to prepare for these risks and/or take advantage of
emerging opportunities, including:
The MA evaluated the global status of provisioning, regulating and cultural services. An upwards arrow indicates that the condition of the
service globally has been enhanced and a downwards arrow that it has been degraded in the recent past.
3
Water
scarcity3
4
Water
scarcity
Risk to reputation and brand image as a result of In August 2006, the World
excessive or inefficient use. Business Council for Sustainable
Development completed an
interlinked set of Water
Scenarios to 2025, highlighting
three key challenges for
business: efficiency, security
and interconnectivity. These
“Water security for “People are starting to
Scenarios can be used to test
business depends on realize that water is
business strategies as well as create a framework for
the understanding of not the widely
the capacities of available commodity structured dialogue among stakeholders.5
ecosystems, the they thought it was;
valuation of their this will, and is
services, and on the already, influencing
water security of other customer behavior
stakeholders.” and expectations.”
Jürg Gerber, Alcan Noel Morrin, Skanska
5
Climate
change6
6
Climate
change
Business risks posed by climate change include: Enhanced reputation and brand through corporate
policies and proactive action to reduce GHG
Reduced agricultural yields and insecurity of crucial emissions (e.g., conducting a GHG inventory,
raw materials, such as water, caused by higher setting reduction targets);
temperatures and increasingly complex regional Earning a place at the policy-makers’ table in
variation in weather patterns; response to timely and effective company action.
Reduced ecosystem resilience generated by the loss
of species and their stabilizing interactions;
Source: World Resources Institute/CAIT. 2005.
“Any change in “We must be able to Global Emissions of Carbon Dioxide from Fossil Fuels,
climate is going to demonstrate leadership 1900-2004
change agriculture on climate change and
2004
significantly, as the be attractive to the SRI 30
20
productive because of a are not proactive, it will
15
perfect combination of prove challenging to
10
fertile soils, maintain the leading
temperature and water position we have with 5
Skanska has begun to develop its approach to climate change by using scenario modeling. These models will be
applied to new development projects to assess the potential impacts of climate change on indoor climate and
help the company consider architectural designs accordingly. For example redesigning heating, ventilation and
air conditioning systems can significantly lower energy demand, with annual consumption of less than 100 kW
per square meter achievable in commercial offices.
7
Habitat
change8
“Loss of habitat
Changes in land use have significantly altered the capacity of
results in the ecosystems to provide services. Today, one-quarter of the Earth’s
immediate land surface is covered by cultivated systems.
extirpation of local
[wildlife] populations
and the loss of the Habitat fragmentation is most severe in Europe and least severe in
services that these South America. Many countries in sub-Saharan Africa suffer from low
populations
provided.” 9
soil productivity and rely on the expansion of cultivated areas to meet
the demand for food.
The economic value of About 12% of the Earth’s land area is designated as
converted land is often far protected.
less than that of
sustainably managed Future rates of habitat loss will depend in part on
natural systems that changes in human population, wealth, trade and
provide a greater variety technology. Projections for the next 50 years
Amazon, which comprises about one-third of the Demand for food crops will grow by 70-85%;
world’s tropical forest, plays an important role in
Forest cover will continue to increase in industrial
regulating the hydrological cycle underpinning the
countries, and commercial plantations may provide
country’s agriculture and hydropower. Nonetheless,
an increasing proportion of timber products;
between 2000 and 2005, Brazil accounted for 42% of
net global forest loss, with most of this deforestation Some 10-20% of remaining grassland and
occurring in the Brazilian Amazon. forestland will be converted for agricultural,
urban and infrastructure development purposes;
Modifying habitats changes the distribution of Land conversion will mainly occur in developing
species. The time lag between habitat change and countries and dryland regions;
extinction provides opportunities to invest in habitat
restoration and re-establish wildlife populations. Land use change will continue to be a major
Interventions for habitat restoration include driver of ecosystem change in terrestrial and
enhancing the efficacy of resource use and freshwater ecosystems;
management, preventing pollution, and encouraging Habitat losses will lead to global extinctions,
the establishment and expansion of protected areas. including a 10-15% reduction in plant species.
8
Habitat
change
Asia
Oceania
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Percentage of land converted
9
Biodiversity
loss and
invasive
species10
activities are compromising opportunities for future The main causes of current and future biodiversity
progress and profitability in all regions of the world. loss are human induced and include:
Maintaining nature’s diverse portfolio to draw from is
a way of reducing business risk. Habitat change, particularly conversion of natural
systems to agriculture;
Over the past few hundred years, species extinction
Climate change, which may become the
rates have increased by 1,000 times over background
dominant driver in the coming decades;
rates, mainly due to habitat change, non-native
invasive species and overexploitation. Genetic diversity Invasive species, particularly on islands and in
has declined globally, particularly among cultivated estuaries and freshwater ecosystems;
species. Some 10-30% of mammal, bird and Overexploitation, particularly of fish stocks;
amphibian species are threatened with extinction.
Regions long known for their distinctive plant and Nutrient overloading, especially in Europe, North
animal assemblages are becoming more America and East and South Asia.
homogeneous due to the spread of invasive species,
primarily through the expansion of international trade.
10
Biodiversity
loss and
invasive
species
Mountains of
Caucasus Central Asia
Polynesia-
Micronesia
Cadbury Schweppes is engaged in an Earthwatch T
Chocó-
Africa
Oceans cover more than 70% of the Earth, playing key roles in
“All oceans are
affected by humans to climate regulation, the freshwater cycle, food provisioning and
various degrees, with delivering cultural services.
overfishing having
the most widespread
and the dominant Coastal zones cover only 8% of the Earth, but the services they
direct impact on food provide are responsible for approximately 43% of the estimated total
provisioning services,
value of ecosystem services. Being the most productive part of the
which will affect
future generations.”13 ocean, the coastal boundary zones yield about 90% of marine
fisheries. They also have high levels of pollution. Nearly 40% of the
human population lives within 100 km of the coast.
12
Over-
exploitation
of oceans
Implications provided by the marine New products, services and markets (e.g., reef
environment, including
species for pharmaceuticals, mangrove restoration
fishing, oil and gas extraction, and recreation.
for flood protection, wetlands restoration for water
purification);
Risks to business from continued overexploitation of
oceans include: Investment in research & development (R&D) to
overcome environmental harm from today’s
Depletion of fish stocks, reducing revenue and harvesting and cultivation practices;
triggering new catch regulations; Increased market demand for low-impact fish
Property damage, asset losses and rising farming, shipping and tourism.
insurance rates associated with the loss of natural
coastal protection;
700 000
600 000
500 000
400 000
“Some businesses are “Certification
300 000
already experiencing processes like MSC
direct impacts through are vital for raising
200 000
while other businesses encourages The collapse of Canada’s Newfoundland cod fishery in the 1990s
are or may be affected participation of all forced its indefinite closure after hundreds of years of exploitation.
by the increased stakeholders, which is Offshore bottom trawling, beginning in the late 1950s, increased the
frequency of outbreaks essential to make it catch temporarily but caused declines in the ocean's underlying
biomass. After more than a decade the stock has still not recovered.
of disease or blooms of work in practice and
nuisance species that for transparency, but
are symptomatic of it is also very time
unstable ocean consuming.”
systems.”14
Jan Kees Vis, Unilever
degradation of freshwater and coastal ecosystem Land management can also play a role. Changing
services. Increases in nitrogen inputs are caused mainly natural habitats into large-scale, low-diversity
by poor or absent sewage systems, insufficient agricultural landscapes affects nutrient cycling and
wastewater treatment, and fertilizers used in food undermines the capacity of ecosystems to absorb and
production. Erosion of soil carrying agricultural retain nutrients.
phosphorus that enters into freshwater systems
contributes to eutrophication. Forest ecosystems are at
high risk of acidification from sulfur emissions.
14
Nutrient
overloading
15
A meeting of business To build a sufficient shared response to ecosystem
leaders, government degradation, governments worldwide must
officials and scientists held employ fiscal and regulatory mechanisms;
by Earthwatch Institute in
Spatial information on ecosystem degradation
London in September
should be widely available and accessible as
2006 to discuss the
Broader business and ecosystems
a public good to help business planning and
perspectives responses;
agenda produced the
following observations: The development of an “ecosystem marketplace”
that is widely accepted and encompasses both
Meeting ecosystem challenges depends on ecosystem investments and payment for
scientists and business strategists with different ecosystem services is crucial in adopting a
world views developing shared perspectives response of suitable scale;
and research; New tools are required by businesses to manage
Executives may feel more comfortable responding ecosystems, recognize the true value of the
to ecosystem challenges when other business services they provide, and internalize the costs
leaders are doing the same; of public goods and services usage in business
operations.
As ecosystem management becomes integral
and widespread among businesses, benefits in
terms of competitive environmental advantage
may be reduced;
The collaboration between Earthwatch Institute, the World Conservation Union (IUCN),
the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and the World
Resources Institute (WRI) aims to make the business community aware of the
degradation of ecosystems and ecosystem services and promote ways that business
can respond to these challenges.
The collaboration plans further publications, including one that will focus upon how
Partnership new business models, markets and entrepreneurs can profit from responding to
ecosystem challenges. WRI, WBCSD, Meridian Institute and several WBCSD member companies are also pilot-
testing a methodology that assesses a company’s impact and dependency on ecosystem services.
16
1. United Nations (UN). 10. Information extracted from: UN. Ecosystems &
Ecosystems & Human Well- Human Well-being, Current State and Trends. Chapters
being, Synthesis. 2005. 4, 10 & 11. 2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-
being Opportunities and Challenges for Business and
2. UN. Ecosystems &
Industry. 2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being,
Human Well-being,
Synthesis. 2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being,
Opportunities and
Biodiversity Synthesis. 2005; Secretariat of the
Notes Challenges for Business and
Convention on Biological Diversity. Global Biodiversity
Industry. 2005.
Outlook 2. 2006; WRI. EarthTrends; Earthwatch
3. Information extracted from: UN. Ecosystems & company interviews; ISIS Asset Management. Is
Human Well-being, Current State and Trends. chapters Biodiversity a Material Risk to Companies? 2005;
7 and 20. 2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Wellbeing: Earthwatch, IUCN & WBCSD. Business & Biodiversity,
Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry. The Handbook for Corporate Action. 2002.
2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Wellbeing, Synthesis.
11. UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being, Synthesis,
2005; WRI. EarthTrends; Earthwatch company
p. 4. 2005.
interviews; WBCSD. Water Facts and Trends. 2005;
OECD. Observer. No. 236. March 2003. 12. Information extracted from: UN. Ecosystems &
Human Well-being, Current State and Trends. Chapters
4. UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being, Current State
18 & 19. 2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being
and Trends. Chapter 7, p. 190. 2005.
Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry.
5. WBCSD. Business in the World of Water: Water 2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being, Synthesis.
Scenarios to 2025. 2006. 2005; Science. Worm et al. Impacts of Biodiversity Loss
6. Information extracted from: UN. Ecosystems & on Ocean Ecosystem Services November 2006: Vol.
Human Well-being, Current State and Trends. Chapter 314. no. 5800. November 2006; Wal-Mart Inc. press
13. 2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being release. 2006 (http://www.msc.org/html/
Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry. ni_239.htm); WRI. EarthTrends; Earthwatch company
2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being, Synthesis, interviews.
2005; WRI. Navigating the Numbers. 2005; 13. UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being, Current State
Earthwatch company interviews; WBCSD. Facts and and Trends. Chapter 18, p. 479. 2005.
Trends to 2050, Energy and climate change. 2006;
14. UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being Opportunities
WBCSD. Pathways to 2050, Energy and climate
and Challenges for Business and Industry, p. 14. 2005.
change. 2005; International Emissions Trading
Association and the World Bank. State and Trends of 15. Information extracted from: UN. Ecosystems &
the Carbon Market. 2006. Human Well-being, Current State and Trends. Chapter
12. 2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being
7. UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being, Synthesis,
Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry.
p. 17. 2005.
2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being, Synthesis.
8. Information extracted from: UN. Ecosystems & 2005; IFDC report, incl. Henao, J. and Baanante, C.
Human Well-being, Current State and Trends. chapters Agricultural Production and Soil Nutrient Mining in
4 and 11. 2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being Africa. 2006; WRI. EarthTrends; Earthwatch company
Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry. interviews.
2005; UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being, Synthesis.
16. UN. Ecosystems & Human Well-being, Current State
2005; Secretariat of the Convention on Biological
and Trends. Chapter 12, p. 333. 2005.
Diversity. Global Biodiversity Outlook 2. 2006; WRI,
incl. Barreto, P. et al. Human Pressure on the Brazilian
Amazon Forests. 2006; IUCN, incl. Emerton, L. et al.
Sustainable Financing of Protected Areas: A Global
Review of Challenges and Options. 2006; WRI.
EarthTrends; Earthwatch company interviews.
17
Earthwatch Institute
Earthwatch Institute is an international environmental 80,000 volunteers in support of 2,800 field research
organization whose mission is to engage people projects in 118 countries. These volunteers have
worldwide in scientific field research and education to contributed over 10 million hours to essential field work.
promote the understanding and action necessary for a
sustainable environment. Since 1971 Earthwatch has been Earthwatch Institute (Europe)’s Corporate Environmental
bringing together individual volunteers and scientists on Responsibility Group (CERG) is a platform for enhancing
field research projects as a means of providing essential good practice among the business sector. CERG
funding and a dedicated labor force for international members benefit from networking and shared learning
scientists. Earthwatch believe that by involving the general with other companies committed to good
public in science, they gain the knowledge, skills and environmental practice, stakeholder dialogue through
motivation needed to take responsibility for the report/policy feedback services and disseminating good
environment. Earthwatch currently supports over 130 practice through presentations at Earthwatch seminars.
environmental research projects in 50 countries. Since
1971 the worldwide organization has recruited over www.earthwatch.org
WBCSD
The World Business Council for Sustainable Our objectives include:
Development (WBCSD) brings together some 180 Business Leadership – to be a leading business advocate
international companies in a shared commitment to on sustainable development;
sustainable development through economic growth, Policy Development – to help develop policies that
ecological balance and social progress. Our members create framework conditions for the business
are drawn from more than 30 countries and 20 major contribution to sustainable development;
industrial sectors. We also benefit from a global
The Business Case – to develop and promote the
network of 50+ national and regional business councils
business case for sustainable development;
and partner organizations.
Best Practice – to demonstrate the business contribution
Our mission is to provide business leadership as a to sustainable development and share best practices
catalyst for change toward sustainable development, among members;
and to support the business license to operate, Global Outreach – to contribute to a sustainable future
innovate and grow in a world increasingly shaped by for developing nations and nations in transition.
sustainable development issues.
www.wbcsd.org
18
World Resources Institute
The World Resources Institute (WRI) goes beyond Stable Climate – Protect the global climate system from
research to create practical ways to protect the Earth and further harm due to emissions of greenhouse gases and
improve people’s lives. Its mission is to move human help humanity and the natural world adapt to
society to live in ways that protect Earth’s environment unavoidable climate change.
and its capacity to provide for the needs and aspirations Sustainable Enterprise – Harness markets and enterprise
of current and future generations. to expand economic opportunity and protect the
environment.
For more than 20 years, WRI has demonstrated its
Access to Environmental Information and Decisions –
commitment to helping find solutions to these
Guarantee public access to information and decisions
enormous global environmental challenges. WRI’s work
regarding natural resources and the environment.
is concentrated on making progress toward four goals:
Contributing Authors Beryl Rajbhandari, WWF US; and Mark Gough, Reed Elsevier, who
Andrea Athanas, Joshua Bishop, Amy Cassara, Pamela provided input to our interviews and research which informs this
Donaubauer, Chris Perceval, Mohammad Rafiq, Janet publication and the future direction of our work.
Ranganathan and Pernille Risgaard.
We would also like to thank all reviewers for their valuable
Acknowledgements comments and guidance: Jason Alexandra, Ed Barker, Karen
We would like to thank members of the WBCSD Ecosystems Bennett, James Burton, David Cooper, Jenny Guiling, Craig
Champions Group and Earthwatch’s Corporate Environmental Hanson, Graham Hemson, Dave Hillyard, Charles Iceland, David
Responsibility Group (CERG) for their support and input of Jhirad, Jeff McNealy, Roger Mitchell, Daniel Prager, Brianna
knowledge for this publication. Thanks to the participants of the Peterson, Penny Richards, Daniel I. Rubenstein, Nat Spring,
CERG event on September 20, 2006 for your input to the Marie Studer and Nigel Winser.
discussion on business responses to ecosystem degradation, and a
special thank you to: Edward Blamey and Karin Laljani, Interface Supported by
Europe; Noel Morrin, Skanska; Juan Gonzalez-Valero, Syngenta; Financial support was provided by Rio Tinto, Shell Group,
Claus Frier and Ditte Olsen, Novozymes; Jan Kees Vis, Unilever; Cadbury Schweppes and the WBCSD.
David Richards and Kristina Ringwood, Rio Tinto; Peter Gardiner,
Mondi; Steven de Bie, Shell Group; Andy Tomczynski, Thames
Water Utilities; Priya N. Matzen, Novo Nordisk; David Croft, World Business Council for
Sustainable Development