Professional Documents
Culture Documents
31st Conference on OUR WORLD IN CONCRETE & STRUCTURES: 16 - 17 August 2006, Singapore
Article Online Id: 100031053
e version of this article can be found at:
http://cipremier.com/100031053
This article is brought to you with the support of
Singapore Concrete Institute
www.scinst.org.sg
All Rights reserved for CIPremier PTE LTD
or resale the article in any format without written approval of
CIPremier PTE LTD
Visit Our Website for more information
www.cipremier.com
31 Conference on OUR WORLD IN CONCRETE & STRUCTURES: 16 17 August 2006, Singapore
st
Abstract
This paper presents the result of core and cube compressive strength of hardened concrete. Non destructive te
Sixteen cores (diameter 75mm) were extracted from the hardened concrete of 12- years old building. Twel
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
RCC Column
RCC Column
RCC Column
RCC Column
RCC Slab
RCC Slab
RCC Slab
RCC Slab
RCC Wall
1524
1516
1608
1572
1500
1448
1196
1138
1480
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
150
150
150
150
150
140.462
121.41
114.046
150
4418
4418
4418
4418
4418
4418
4418
4418
4418
12.627
10.885
19.158
19.375
14.1509
26.930
23.2198
25.749
7.619
150
150
4.78
113.79
113.79
113.79
150
Length
(mm)
4418
4418
4418
4418
4418
4418
4418
21.770
21.537
14.142
13.596
16.733
12.550
10.0145
Area
(mm )
2
Corrected Compressive
Strength of core (MPa)
1. CS-3
360.91
48
92.40
1809.557
15.840
2. BS-2
392.92
48
96.64
1809.557
22.3117
3. BS-1
389.93
48
97.18
1809.557
23.3710
4. CS-1
400.53
48
100.12
1809.557
22.3117
5. GS-2
385.97
48
98.17
1809.557
13.810
6. CS-2
398.36
48
100.15
1809.557
19.120
7. R-7
300
48
77.26
1809.557
12.352
8. R-3
258.52
48
64.77
1809.557
15.507
9. BS-4
250.31
48
64.70
1809.557
12.00
10. R-3 (RAFT)
239.72
48
61.69
1809.557
15.877
11. R-3
212.62
48
52.64
1809.557
21.347
Table 3 Results of Cubes
Sr.
Cube size
Location
Corrected Compressive Strength of
No
core (MPa)
.
1. 150 x 150 x 150
Column
25.
2. 150 x 150 x 150
Column
20
3. 150 x 150 x 150
Column
28
4. 100 x 100 x 100
Slab
33
5. 100 x 100 x 100
Slab
33
6. 100 x 100 x 100
Slab
28
7. 100 x 100 x 100
Slab
35
8. 100 x 100 x 100
Slab
32
9. 100 x 100 x 100
Wall
32
10. 100 x 100 x 100
Wall
26
11.
100 x 100 x 100
Wall
27
12. 100 x 100 x 100
Wall
35
13. 100 x 100 x 100
Slab
31
14. 100 x 100 x 100
Slab
35
15. 100 x 100 x 100
Slab
36
4. Results and Discussion
The cores (diameter 48mm) show greater compressive strength of concrete as compared to the cores (diameter 75mm). T
The smaller size cores have smaller cross-sectional area. The compressive strength is load per unit area. Due to smaller
5. Relation between Core Compressive Strength and Cube Strength
It was found from the result; the compressive strength of cores (75mm diameter) is 0.693 times the compressive strength
The compressive strength of cores (48mm diameter) is 0.552 times the compressive strength of cubes (100mm x 1
6. Conclusion
From the results of the tested specimen the following conclusion were made.
1. The compare strength of cubes was greater than the compressive strength of cores.
2. The smaller size cubes (100mm x 100mm x 100mm) give greater compressive strength of cubes as compared to larger
3. The smaller size cubes strength is 1.311 times larger size cube compressive strength.
4. The strength of cores (48mm) is 5% greater than cores (75mm).
7. Reference
[1]. British standard institution, Guide to the use of non-destructive methods of test for hardened concrete, BS, 881
[2]. Fookes P.G concrete in the middle test past, present ad future , review Damage Assessment Repair Techniques and
[3]. Pocock ,D.C the selection o cost-effective repair strategies for corrosion damage concrete an determination and respir
[4]. Rasheed uzzafar , D and Gahtani, A.S corrosion of reinforcement in concrete structure in the middle of east concrete
[5]. Rasheed uzzafar Dakhil , F.H and Bader,A.M toward solving the concrete determination problem in the gulf region, th
ED CONCRETE
ARDENED CONCRETE
e. Non destructive test methods are used to investigate the properties and strength of hardened concrete. In exis
ars old building. Twelve cores (48mm diameter) were also extracted from the same hardened concrete building. Two
m as planned or to discover its characteristics if its history is unknown. For new concrete this usually involves casting specimens from
ting methods are useful in some instances and can help identify areas from which samples should be taken. The normal me
e Varity of properties. Non destructive and semi-destructive methods play an important role in evaluating the existing structure c
ete and effect of size of cube on compressive strength of concrete.
ve strength.
ars old concrete buildings at different locations of the structural members. Some cores were taken from columns, beams and some co
make the ends smooth. After capping, cores were tested in compression testing machine in the concrete laboratory. No rebars
the average compressive strength of 100mm x 100mm x 100mm was found to be 32MP [4608psi]. The average corrected compressive
res (diameter 75mm). The cubes (100mm x 100mm x 100mm) show greater compressive strength as compared to cubes (150m
t area. Due to smaller size, the strength of smaller diameter cores was greater as compared to the larger size diameter of cores
compressive strength of cubes (150mm x 150mm x150mm). The compressive strength of cores (75mm diameter) is 0.528 time
th of cubes (100mm x 100mm x 100mm).
ened concrete. In existing concrete structures there was no direct relation between the results of non-destructive t
concrete building. Two sizes of cubes (150mm x 150 x 150mm) and (100mm x 100mm x 100mm) were made from the
casting specimens from fresh concrete and testing them for various properties as the concrete matures. The concrete cube test
e taken. The normal method of concrete sampling is by coring although same chemical analysis techniques can be carried out
ing the existing structure conditions [1, 2]. Non destructive test methods are used to indicate properties other than strength [3, 4]. Britis
ns, beams and some cores were taken from base slab, floor slabs and walls. In the same location concrete stone pieces were
crete laboratory. No rebars were found in the cores. The results of cores are shown in table 1 & 2. After making the regular shape of cub
age corrected compressive strength of cores having diameter 75mm was 17MPa [2466psi]. The average compressive strength of cores
m diameter) is 0.528 times the compressive strength of cubes (100mm x 100mm x 100mm). The core (48mm diameter) compressive
rability vol.11nov
ts of non-destructive tests. This paper describes the relation between core compressive strength and cube compre
) were made from the hardened concrete from stone pieces which were taken from the structural members of building
es. The concrete cube tests, concrete cylinder tests are the most familiar tests and are used as the standard method of measuring c
niques can be carried out on drilling dust samples.
than strength [3, 4]. British Standard defined non destructive testing as a test that does not impair the intended performance of the elem
oncrete stone pieces were taken. The length of cores was variable as shown in the table 1 & 2. The concrete stones were made into t
g the regular shape of cubes of sizes 150mm x150mm x 150mm and 100mm x100mm x 100mm they were tested in compression testin
pressive strength of cores having diameter of 48mm was 18MPa [2611psi]. All cores were tested in dry condition. The strength of cores
m diameter) compressive strength is 0.724 times the compressive strength of cubes (150mm x 150mm x 150mm).
method of measuring compressive strength for quality control purposes. Concrete beam specimens are cast to test for flexural st
ed performance of the element or member under investigation [5]. The non- destructive evaluation techniques are used to assess the co
e stones were made into the regular cube shape of size 150mm x 150mm x 150mm and 100mm x100mm x 100mm by stone cutting m
sted in compression testing machine. The results of cubes are shown in table 3.
on. The strength of cores was calculated after applying all the factors given in ASTM C42-90.
x 150mm).
trength was determined in compression testing machine. It was found that smaller size cubes (100mm x 100mm x
e cast to test for flexural strength and cast cylinder cone be used for tensile strength. Specimens for many other tests can be made
are used to assess the condition of concrete structures, to predict future performance and allow minor repair system. The best kn
00mm by stone cutting machine. The cores were extracted by using rotary cutting machine with diamond bits.
s (100mm x 100mm x 100mm) and cores (48mm diameter) show greater strength as compared to larger size cubes (15
other tests can be made at the same time to assess other properties.
air system. The best known non destructive evaluation techniques use ultrasonic waves, core testing, Schmidt hammer test. T
larger size cubes (150mm x 150 x 150mm) and cores (diameter 75mm). It was also found that the cubes (150mm x 1
Schmidt hammer test. The estimation of in place concrete strength requires that a known relationship between the results of
the cubes (150mm x 150 x 150mm) compressive strength is 76% the cubes (100mm x 100mm x 100mm) compressive
p between the results of in-situ testing and the strength of concrete. For existing construction the relationship has to be assessed o
100mm) compressive strength. The 75mm diameter cores compressive strength is sixty nine percent the compressive
ship has to be assessed on site correlating non-destructive test results to strength of core. There was no any relation between core stre
relation between core strength and cube strength of hardened concrete. In this research work a relationship between core strength and