Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 | Page
Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
.2
INTRODUCTION
.3
DEFINATION(Problem Identification)
.4
MEASUREMENT(Data Collection)
...4
KPI
Tree
.5
ABC Analysis of Raw Materials (Inventory)
..6
FSN Analysis of WIP and Finished Goods
Inventory.6
Capacity Planning for SDT manufacturing
process..8
VSM for SDT manufacturing
process.8
Fishbone
Diagram
.9
IMPROVEMENTS(Recommended Solutions)
Improved Contribution.
..10
Inventory
Management..
10
2 | Page
Process Flow
Optimization..
..11
REFERENCES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to express our indebtedness to all those who have helped us in doing this
report or those who provided the possibility of completing the project or have been associated
with the report in any way and made it a worth-while experience.
We would like to express our gratitude to our batch mates and our seniors who shared their
invaluable experiences and helped us in every possible way to make this project a success.
Furthermore we would like to thank Mr Rajshekar of Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd for his
valuable inputs like OEE charts and Capacity planning chart of Kirloskar plants.
We would like to express heartfelt thanks to Prof.xxx for having given us the opportunity and
lending us his support for working on such a project and guiding it to successful completion.
Thank you all.
3 | Page
INTRODUCTION:Company OverviewKirloskar Electric Company Ltd. is one of the leading Indian electrical engineering
companies. Established in 1946, Kirloskar Electric was the catalyst for industrialization in
India.
Kirloskar Electric produces more than 70 products under eight product groups. They cater to
core economic sectors such as power generation, transmission & distribution, transportation,
and renewable energy, to name a few.
The Kirloskar Electric organization comprises nine manufacturing locations and 34 sales
offices spread across the country. They have a large network of spare parts dealers and
service centres. This enables them to provide premium products, exemplary systems &
services at competitive rates to our clients.
Kirloskar products are known for their high quality, durability, and reliability. This is due to
their emphasis on design, engineering, and manufacturing. They adhere to international
standards by acquiring & adapting latest technologies along with in-house R&D.
4 | Page
2) AC Generators
3) DC Motors
4) DG Sets
5) Transformers
6) Switchgear
7) Electronics
8) Tractions
DEFINATION:Broad problem definition:- Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd has been facing the
problem of decreasing profit margin for the past 3 years, and in 2015 it saw
negative ROIC of -162% which is the lowest in the past 10 years of business.
Problem breakdown:1) High Cash conversion Cycle ( Days sales outstanding + Days
Inventory Days A/c payable):Kirloskar Electric Company Limited =85.68 days
Schneider Electric India = 77.11 days
ABB India Ltd=81.5 days
2) High Days Inventory:Kirloskar Electric Company Limited =99.76 days
Schneider Electric India = 77.11days
ABB India Ltd=77.36 days
3) Inventory/Revenue Ratio
Kirloskar Electric Company Limited =0.32
Schneider Electric India = 0.27
ABB India Ltd=0.14
MEASUREMENT (Data Collection):Aim for data collection:1) Cash conversion cycle calculation
2) Days Inventory
3) Inventory classification
5 | Page
4)
5)
6)
7)
OEE Calculation
ROIC Calculation
Capacity Planning
Value Stream Mapping
Data collected
1) Major Raw material Consumption for the FY 2014-2015
2) Inventory turnover ratio, WIP and Finished goods Inventory for FY 20142015
3) OEE Chart details
4) Process flow data for SDT (Transformer)
5) Man power planning, working hour , quality , performance of equipments
6) Financial ratios for the FY 2014-2015
ANALYSIS:KPI TREE
All cost related data in INR Crores
Cause Analysis:1) OEE is too low because of which the contribution for the year has decreased
drastically to create an environment for negative EBIT
6 | Page
2) The ROIC for the year is too low -162% which is the lowest in the past 10 years
3) Industry average of ROIC = 14.35%
4) In OEE as per Planned machine & man power activity
Availability: - 3 shifts of 8 hours including 1.5 hours lunch and 1 hour break (Buffer)
Availability = (18.5/24) *100 = 77%
Quality as per Machine specifications in annual reports and Investor data = 89 %
Units produced in 2015 =19869, Actual production possible = 43860
The above figure suggest OEE = 45%
OEE = Availability * Performance *Quality => Performance = 65.6% which is very
low suggesting many maintenance activities take place due to breakdowns , errors etc.
ABC and FSN ANALYSIS OF INVENTORY
ABC ANALYSIS
OF RAW
MATERIALS
Raw Materials
Inventory Data.docx
Class of Item
Number of Items
Value
225.7 Crores
60.73 Crores
13
13.57 Crores
Chart Title
95.48
75.23
Avg.
Inventory Turnover
COGS Inventory
Ratio
Category
150
99.16
1.52 S
100
7 | Page
Transformer
s
DG Sets
87.84
62.16
20.02
11.36
4.39 F
5.48 F
Cause Analysis:1) The Item which contributes the most to the revenue is the slowest moving item.
2) The Inventory turnover ratio of Motors is 1.52, but motors contribute the most to the
revenue and have the highest COGS. As a result of this the average Inventory Turnover Ratio
comes down to 1.84 which is less than 2 implying the overall inventory movement is slow.
(http://ijiset.com/vol2/v2s4/IJISET_V2_I4_44.pdf) Categorisation into FSN
3) Number of orders not adjusted as per PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT on the basis ABC
analysis
8 | Page
LV
Windin
g
Set-Up
Time
Cycle Time
No.of
Shifts
No. Of
workstation
s
No. Of
Operators
Batch Size
HV
Windin
g
Core &
Coil
Assembl
y
LV & HV
Connection
s
Tankin
g
LFH/NF
H
Tes
t
Shipping
0.2
1.6
5
Cool
0.6
0.6
0.3
1.6
1.25
3.75
0.75
1.75
0.5
7.5
2.25
1 -
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
6
1
6
2
1
0.5
1.2
5
Capacity Planning:-
LV Winding
HV Winding
Core
&
Assembly
No.Of
workstatio
ns
1
2
Batch Size
1
2
Daily
Availabl
e
Time(hr)
19.5
19.5
13
Net
Operati
ng
Time(hr
)
1.25
4
0.75
5460
Coil
LV
&
HV
Connections
2
1
13
1.75
2340
Tanking
1
1
13
0.5
8190
LFH/NFH
1
6
19.5
7.5
4914
Cool
1
6
19.5
2.25
16380
Test
1
1
8.125
0.5
5118.75
Shipping
1
13
1.2
3412.5
Ttotal = 315*3*(8-1.5) = 6142 hours, Yearly demand = 3000, Takt time =
6142/3000 =2.07 hours
VSM for the year 2015
All values are in days
0
1.2
2
2
1
9 | Page
SDT
Through put
Value Added
Ratio of Value Added
time
Time
Waste Time
%
Days
Days
Days
37.9
5.5
32.4
14.51
Cause Analysis:1)
2)
3)
4)
10 | P a g e
11 | P a g e
Asset turnover ratio = 0.74 which is less than ABB India 1.12 and Schneider India
1.08
Problem 2:Inventory Management:1) PREFERENIAL ORDERING as per ABC Analysis:EQUAL TREATMENT TO ALL:-
Item
Annual
Consumptio
n( IN INR
Corer)
225.7
60.73
13.57
Numb
er Of
Orders
Value
Avg.
per
Inventor
Order
y
18.808 9.40416
12
33
67
5.0608 2.53041
12
33
67
1.1308 0.56541
12
33
67
Total
12.5
Item
Annual
Consumptio
n( IN INR
Corer)
225.7
B
C
60.73
13.57
Numb
er Of
Orders
Value
Avg.
per
Inventor
Order
y
8.3592 4.17962
27
59
96
8.6757 4.33785
7
14
71
2
6.785
3.3925
11.9099
Total
87
12 | P a g e
SDT
Through put
Value Added
Ratio of Value Added
time
Time
Waste Time
%
Days
Days
Days
12.163
5.068
7.095
41.67%
With the new Capacity planning the Ratio of Value added %increased
from 14.51 to 41.67%
CONTROL:-
13 | P a g e
Pareto Analysis: - To analyse which process improvement contributes most
Pareto
solutions.xlsx
100
93.14
72.74