Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DDS Izmir Katip Celebi University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Izmir, Turkey
DDS Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Trabzon, Turkey
article info
abstract
Article history:
pressing, CAD/CAM) and have various compositions with different crystalline contents that
8 November 2012
Methods: A total of 60 specimens were prepared from e.max Press, e.max CAD, Empress
Esthetic, e.max Ceram, Inline, and ZirPress systems (A1 shade; diameter 10 mm; thickness
0.5 0.05 mm). The L*, a*, and b* values, chroma and translucency (TP) of each system were
recorded before and after ageing. The statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA,
Keywords:
Laminate veneer
Results: The L* value of the shade guide was significantly different from those of the full-
Optical property
ceramic systems; however, there were no significant differences between the a* values of
Shade guide
Ceram, Esthetic, Inline and Zirpress. There were significant differences between the b*
Translucency
values of the shade guide compared with the full-ceramics except for e.max Press. The L*
Chroma
values decreased, and the a* and b* values increased after the ageing process for all groups.
Ageing
There were no significant differences between the DE values of the ceramic systems
( p > 0.05). The TP values decreased, and the chroma value increased significantly after
the ageing process ( p > 0.05). The chroma of the shade guide was found to be the highest.
Conclusions: None of the full-ceramic systems was able to match the color of the shade
guide. The chemical structures of the ceramic systems were more effective for determining
the optical parameters than the fabrication techniques. Ageing caused full-ceramics to
become more opaque, darker, reddish and yellowish.
# 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1.
Introduction
* Corresponding author at: Izmir Katip Celebi Universitesi, Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi, Aydnlk Evler Mahallesi, Cemil Meric Caddesi, 6780
Sokak, No: 48, 35640-Cigli, Izmir, Turkey. Tel.: +90 532 6804656.
E-mail address: bbagis@yahoo.com (B. Bagis).
0300-5712/$ see front matter # 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.013
e25
2.
2.1.
Specimen preparation
2.2.
e.max Press
Empress Esthetic
ZirPress
emax.Ceram
Inline
e.max CAD
Manufacturer
Material type
Lithium disilicate
Leucite
Fluorapatite
Nano-fluorapatite
Leucite
Lithium disilicate
Technique
Pressing
Pressing
Pressing
Layering
Layering
Machining
e26
2.3.
2.7.
Measurement of optic parameters after ageing of the
ceramics
2.4.
2.5.
1=2
where b refers to the color coordinates over the black background and w refers to those over the white.28,29
2.6.
Ageing test
2.8.
Data analysis
2.9.
Results
The shade guides color values for the A1 shade tab were
measured as L* = 73.8, a* = 0.9, and b* = 10.7. The L* value of
the shade guide was significantly different for all ceramic
systems used; however, there was no significant difference
between the a* values of IPS Ceram, IPS Esthetic, IPS Inline and
IPS Zirpress. There were significant differences between the b*
values of the shade guide and all ceramic groups, except IPS
e.max Press ( p > 0.05).
Tables 24 show the means and standard deviations of the
L*, a*, and b* values of the ceramics before and after ageing.
Two-way ANOVA revealed significant interactions of the a*
values between the ceramic groups and the ageing test
( p < 0.001). There were no significant interactions of the L*
( p = 0.662) and b* values (0.999) between the ceramic groups
and the ageing test. The IPS e.max Press system showed the
highest L* and b* values (L* = 90.9 and b* = 9.8) before ageing,
whereas the IPS Esthetic showed the smallest values
(L* = 86.24 and b* = 5.48). The IPS Esthetic showed the highest
a* value (0.08), and the IPS e.max CAD showed the lowest a*
value (1.74) before ageing. The L* values decreased, and the a*
and b* values increased after the ageing process for all groups.
The color differences after the ageing process are shown in
Table 2. The DE values vary from 1.39 to 1.83, and there were no
e27
Ceram
Esthetic
E.max Press
Inline
ZirPress
E.max CAD
SCALE
L*
a*
b*
89.04 0.41(x)
86.24 0.72(y)
90.9 0.78(x)
89.52 0.87(x)
89.81 0.53(x)
85.32 0.71(x)
73.8(z)
0.72 0.12(x)
0.08 0.13(x)
1.67 0.17(y)
1.07 0.21(x)
1.0 0.12(x)
1.74 0.09(y)
0.9(x)
6.87 0.5(x)
5.48 0.67(y)
9.8 1.48(wx)
8.17 0.57(z)
8.3 0.32(z)
9.48 1.27(wz)
10.7(tw)
3.
Discussion
Table 3 Means and standard deviations of the L*, a*, and b* and DE values of all-ceramics after ageing.
Ceram (a)
Esthetic (a)
E.max Press (a)
Inline (a)
ZirPress (a)
E.max CAD (a)
L*
a*
b*
DE
88.21 0.64(#)
84.84 0.45(#)
89.92 0.88(#)
88.15 1.03(#)
88.56 0.55(#)
89.84 0.84(#)
0.61 0.12(#)
0.57 0.11(#)
1.2 0.15(#)
0.75 0.11(#)
0.61 0.14(#)
1.28 0.16(#)
7.88 0.77(#)
6.41 0.74(#)
10.78 1.33(#)
9.28 0.69(#)
9.42 0.46(#)
10.42 1.07(#)
1.49(x)
1.71(x)
1.51(x)
1.85(x)
1.83(x)
1.59(x)
Groups with same letters do not have significant differences in columns ( p > 0.05). Symbols show the significant difference between the values
before and after ageing ( p < 0.05).
Table 4 Chroma and TP mean and standard deviation values before and after ageing.
Chroma
Ceram
Esthetic
E.max Press
Inline
ZirPress
E.max CAD
(x)
6.92 0.53
5.48 1.21(y)
9.95 0.89(wz)
8.24 0.48(z)
8.36 0.65(z)
10.04 1.02(wz)
Chromaa
(#)
7.9 0.56
6.38 0.92(#)
10.88 0.77(#)
9.15 0.64(#)
9.42 0.56(#)
11.33 0.82(#)
Translucency
(x)
15.91 0.71
19.87 0.49(w)
16.19 0.95(xy)
19.09 1.16(wz)
17.97 1.01(yz)
14.49 0.83(x)
Translucencya
16.63 0.76(#)
20.89 0.67(#)
16.96 0.81(#)
20.06 1.04(#)
18.06 1.32(#)
14.82 0.79(#)
Groups with same letters do not have significant differences in columns ( p > 0.05). Symbols show the significant difference between the values
before and after ageing ( p < 0.05).
a
After ageing.
e28
e.max Press systems get darker and more red and yellow after
ageing, but this change was clinically imperceptible.20 The
porcelain systems used in the present study showed similar
color changes regardless of their types.
The ageing process also affected the chroma and TP values
of all ceramics, with the TP values decreasing and the chroma
values increasing for all groups. Decreased TP values might be
attributed to the discoloration of the all-ceramic specimens
after ageing. These changes were significantly different. UV
ageing caused the all-ceramics to become more yellow and red
as the a* and b* values increased. As the chroma of the
materials depend on the a* and b* values, it may be suggested
that the specimens would have higher chroma after the ageing
process. The level of clinical acceptability in the variations of
chroma or translucency has not been reported in the
literature, but the ageing process caused the ceramics to
become more opaque and saturated. Clinical trials are
required to assess the optical properties of laminate ceramics
for long-term usage.
4.
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
The authors thank to Dr. Yildirim Hakan Bagis and Dr. Tamer
Tuzuner for their supports while preparing this study
references
e29
e30
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.