0

Assignment 2: Concept Map

by
Jack A. Hyman

An assignment submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements

for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
in
Information Systems

Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences

Nova Southeastern University
DISS-825c - The System Development Process
Fall 2007 Cluster
Professor: Dr. Yair Levy
Due: November 11, 2007
2007

Figure 1. Concept Map of End User Computer Satisfaction in Mobile Learning

(1) Adams, Nelson, and Todd (1992); (2) Davis (1989); (3) Karahanna and Straub (1999);
(4) Segars and Grover (1993); (5) Agarwal and Karahanna (2000); (6) Dishaw and Strong
(1999); (7) Venkatesh (2000); (8) Calisir and Calisir (2004); (9) Davis (1993); (10)
Davis, Bagozzi, and Warshaw (1993); (11) Subramanian (1994); (12) Doll et al. (2004);
(13) Doll and Torkzadeh (1988); (14) Doll and Torkzadeh (1991); (15) Doll and Weidong
(1997); (16) McHaney and Cronan (1998); (17) Lee, Kim, and Lee (1995); (18) Goodhue
(1998); (19) Goodhue and Thompson (1995); (20) Klein, Goodhue, and Davis (1997);
(21) Simon (2000); (22) Klopping and McKinney (2004); (23) Venkatesh and Davis
(2000); (24) Venkatesh (1999); (25) Abdinnour-Helm et al. (2005);
(26) Karimi, Somers, and Gupta (2004); (27) Zviran, Pliskin, and Levin (2005);
(28) Kositanurit, Ngwenyama, and Osei-Bryson (2006); (29) D'Ambra and Wilson
(2004); (30) Lim and Benbasat (2000); (31) Karahanna, Straub, and Chervany (1999);
(32) Zigurs and Buckland (1998); (33) Kim, Jahng, and Lee (2007); (34) Somers,
Nelson, and Karimi (2003); (35) Mathieson and Keil (2005); (36) Webster and Hackley
(1997); (37) Lee, Husing, and Hui-Hsin (2007); (38) Cheung and Lee (2004);
(39) Ramayah and Lo (2007); (40) Bokhari (2005); (41) Liu et al. (2001); (42)
Gullikson et al. (1999); (43) Kim, Kim, and Lee (2005); (44) Kim and Ong (2005)

Reference List
Abdinnour-Helm, S. F., Chaparro, B. S., & Farmer, S. M. (2005). Using the end-user
computing satisfaction (EUCS) instrument to measure satisfaction with a Web site.
Decision Sciences, 36(2), 341-365.
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and
usage of information. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227-248.
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive
absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4),
665-694.
Bokhari, R. H. (2005). The relationship between system usage and user satisfaction: a
meta-analysis. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(1/2), 211-234.
Calisir, F. & Calisir, F. (2004). The relation of interface usability characteristics,
perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with
enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4),
505-516.
Cheung, C. M, & Lee. M. O. (2004). The asymmetric effect of Web site attribute
performance on Web satisfaction: An empirical study. E - Service Journal, 3(3), 6586.
D'Ambra, J., & Wilson, C. S. (2004). Explaining perceived performance of the World
Wide Web: Uncertainty and the task-technology fit model. Internet Research, 14(4),
294-310.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance.
MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-341.
Davis, F. D. (1993) User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics,
user perceptions, and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man
Machine Studies, 38(3), 475-388.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1999). User acceptance of computer
technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science,
35(8), 213-225.
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with
task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9-27.
Doll, W., Deng, X., Raghunathan, T. S., Torkzadeh, G., & Xia, W. (2004). The meaning
and measurement of user satisfaction: A multigroup invariance analysis of the end-

3
user computing satisfaction instrument. Journal of Management Information
Systems, 21(1), 227-262.
Doll, W. & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computer satisfaction.
MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259-274.
Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1991). The measurement of end-user computing
satisfaction: Theoretical and methodological issues. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 5-11.
Doll, W., & Weidong, X. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing
satisfaction index. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-462.
Goodhue, D. L. (1998). Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit
instrument for user evaluations of information systems. Decision Sciences, 29(1),
105-139.
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual
performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-237.
Gullikson, S., Blades, R., & Bragdon, M., et al. (1999). The impact of information
architecture on academic Website usability. The Electronic Library, 17(5), 293 304.
Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived
usefulness and ease-of-use. Information & Management, 35(4), 237-251.
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology
adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and postadoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213.
Karimi, J., Somers, T. M., & Gupta, Y. P. (2004). Impact of environmental uncertainty
and task characteristics on user satisfaction with data. Information Systems
Research, 15(2), 175-193.
Kim, C., Jahng, J., & Lee, J. (2007). An empirical investigation into the utilization-based
information technology success model: Integrating task-performance and social
influence perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 22(2), 152-160.
Kim, H., Kim, J., & Lee, Y. (2005). An empirical study of use contexts in the mobile
internet, focusing on the usability of information architecture. Information Systems
Frontiers, 7(2), 175-186.
Kim, G. M., & Ong, S. M. (2005). An exploratory study of factors influencing m-learning
success. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(1), 92-98.

4
Klein, B. D., Goodhue, D. L., & Davis, G. B. (1997). Can humans detect errors in data?
Impact of base rates, incentives, and goals. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 169-194.
Klopping, I. M., & McKinney, E. (2004). Extending the technology acceptance model
and the task-technology fit model to consumer e-commerce. Information
Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 22(1), 35-48.
Kositanurit, B., Ngwenyama, O., & Osei-Bryson, K. M. (2006). An exploration of factors
that impact individual performance in an ERP environment: An analysis using
multiple analytical techniques. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6),
556-568.
Lee, C. C., Hsing, K. C., & Hui-Hsin C. (2007). An empirical study of mobile commerce
in insurance industry: Task-technology fit and individual differences. Decision
Support Systems, 43(1), 95-110.
Lee, S. M., Kim, Y. R., & Lee, J. (1995). An empirical study of the relationships
among end-user information systems acceptance, training, and effectiveness.
Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 189-203.
Lim, K. H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). The effect of multimedia on perceived equivocality
and perceived usefulness of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 24(3), 449-471.
Liu, C., Arnett, K. P., Capella, L. M., & Taylor, R. D. (2001). Key dimensions of Web
design quality as related to consumer response. The Journal of Computer
Information Systems, 42(1), 70-82.
Mathieson, K., & Keil, M. (1998). Beyond the interface: Ease of use and task/technology
fit. Information & Management, 34(4), 221-230.
McHaney, R., & Cronan, T. P. (1998). Computer simulation success: On the use of the
end-user computing satisfaction instrument: A comment. Decision Sciences, 29(2),
525-537.
Ramayah, T. & Lo, M. C. (2007). Impact of shared beliefs on "perceived usefulness" and
"ease of use" in the implementation of an enterprise resource planning system.
Management Research News, 30(6), 420-431.
Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness:
A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 517-526.
Simon, S. J. (2000). The relationship of learning style and training method to end-user
computer satisfaction and computer use: A structural equation model. Information
Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 18(1), 41-59.

5
Somers, T. M., Nelson, K., & Karimi, J. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the enduser computing satisfaction instrument: Replication within an ERP domain.
Decision Sciences, 34(3), 595-621.
Subramanian, G. H. (1994). A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of
use. Decision Sciences, 25(5/6), 863-874.
Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of
intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239-260.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic
motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model.
Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-366.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance
model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
Webster, J. & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance
learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282-1309.
Zigurs, I., & Buckland, B. K. (1998). A theory of task/technology fit and group support
systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 313-334.
Zviran, M., Pliskin, N., & Levin, R. (2005). Measuring user satisfaction and perceived
usefulness in the ERP context. The Journal of Computer Information Systems,
45(3), 43-52.

The Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences

Certification of Authorship of Dissertation Work
Submitted to (Advisors Name):
Yair Levy, Ph.D
Students Name:
Jack Alan Hyman
Date of Submission:
November 11, 2007
Purpose and Title of Submission:
Assignment 2: Concept Map
Certification of Authorship: I hereby certify that I am the author of this document and
that any assistance I received in its preparation is fully acknowledged and disclosed in the
document. I have also cited all sources from which I obtained data, ideas, or words that
are copied directly or paraphrased in the document. Sources are properly credited
according to accepted standards for professional publications. I also certify that this paper
was prepared by me for this purpose.
Student's Signature: Jack Alan Hyman____________________________