Text of my now deleted AlterNet article (Ronald Wests blog) from 11

October 2010
By Ronald West
Julian Assange, CIA Agent Provocateur
The New York Times on the WikiLeaks Afghan war documents release:
It is sometimes unclear whether a particular incident report is based on
firsthand observation, on the account of an intelligence source regarded as
reliable, on less-trustworthy sources or on speculation by the writer. It is
also not known what may be missing from the material
The unfiltered intelligence and incident reports are sometimes consistent
with data released to the public. But the archive is clearly an incomplete
record of the war. It is missing many references to seminal events
This [above] is absolutely consistent with methodology using a select
collection of authentic documents employed to deceive as described in
The Secret Team by Colonel Prouty, former Joint Chiefs of Staff/CIA
liason. Colonel Prouty pointed out the Pentagon Papers had been a

deliberately engineered psy-ops operation to shift political responsibility in

the public eye for the colossal intelligence and policy failures in Vietnam,
stating the Pentagon Papers are:
unreliable, inaccurate and marred by serious omissions. They are a
contrived history
Welcome to a cyber-age WikiLeaks repeat of a 40 year old social deceit
This psy-ops trick does not conceal the policy failures, that cannot be done.
What is actually happening here is a deliberate twist put on the facts to
further the political agenda of one party undermining another party with
dirty tricks. The Afghanistan effort had actually only begun coming apart at
the seams [as documented in my blog over the past two years] since it
became apparent Obama would become president
Now up to his neck in a mess engineered to sink him, the timing of this
manipulated documents history released by WikiLeaks is sweet for the neocon engineers of the professionally engineered psy-ops project: Mid-term
elections. It will not get progressives to vote for neo-cons but is intended to
undermine liberal support for their candidates while the right wing will be
motivated to support theirs. Meanwhile Obama marches forward with
Secret Team [also known as FAMILY] CIA career criminal Robert Gates
directing operations. Narcissism is a blinding thing and the criminal element
in our neo-con run military intelligence employing psy-ops operations,
enabling taking political advantage of people like Obama, are having a field
day. This operation is clearly designed to cause social and political
upheaval undermining the administration [not that I am particularly
sympathetic to this administration, people who reads my essays know I am
not, Im pointing out what I see going on from my knowledge and training]
What should Obama do? Clearly, if he wishes to survive, he fires Gates
and his Generals and begins getting out of Afghanistan NOW, particularly
because this entire affairs timing has buried former Bush CIA director
Michael Hayden (a neo-con general) having stated attacking Iran is
presently pushed to top of the CIA/neo-con agenda- which certainly will
bring world social chaos and possibly nuclear war, playing to neo-con

consolidation of control through disaster with emergency dictates and

security measures
The virtue of patience is rewarded in the business of countering counterintelligence, the web of deceit employing disinformation called psy-ops to
put spin on the reality of facts which cannot be otherwise concealed. With a
certain training and identifiable targets, the sniper out to target liars only
need wait for a mistake to be made. People who lie to the public to serve
an agenda of the corporate powerfuls intelligence agencies have made
their first mistake already- in servicing and promoting dishonesty in
humanity which leads to their inevitable coming into focus in a snipers
scope. Truth is unforgiving. Liars cannot forever cover their tracks because
of the very laws of physics, if for no other reason, and I am pleased to take
this shot at wikileaks founder Julian Assange
The Independent on Sunday since 1990 Free from party political ties &
free from proprietorial influence has demonstrated this 18 July 2010 it is
not free of being used like a stooge and interviewed the disingenious
Assange who very nicely blew his cover to bits on record without himself or
the newspaper even realizing it [read article]
My advice to the Independent is to hire a former military intelligence man
with a sense of despise for his former profession when pursuing these sorts
of interviews (no, I am not available, I only want a girlfriend and bungalow
in the country at which time I will be happy to walk away from this entire
business ;o)
The U.S. has wanted him for questioning since March so what on earth is
he doing in Britain whose intelligence agencies are so in bed with USA
intelligence, the two countries should be treated for sex addiction? British
intelligence has repeatedly fought British courts and judges over state
secrets revealing British involvement in USA kidnapping and torture on the
pretext it would jepoardize intelligence sharing with the CIA on top of have
a no proof needed extradition treaty- if the CIA actually wanted Assange,
they had him, right there. Assange was in England (unmolested) to lecture
at an investigative journalists forum.

Assange: Im constantly annoyed people are distracted by false

conspiracies such as 9/11
Lets have a former United States Army General of Intelligence speak to
that:
Major General Albert Stubblebine [watch video]
Assanges Im constantly annoyed people are distracted by false
conspiracies such as 9/11 sounds like exactly the message a CIA seeking
FAMILY military/industrial corporate control through staged disaster would
run: in a counter-intelligence psy-ops operation promoting disinformation at
an investigative journalists forum: Dont look any closer at 9/11
Do I think the CIA was behind 9/11? I dont know. But when we are told by
the presently famous web journalist and founder of wikileaks to ignore the
obvious (taking an even more conservative approach than General
Stubblebein in the video) such as building #7 (nothing hit building 7) having
been brought down by classic and highly professional implosion or
demolition technique, I think we need to look more closely at BOTH: 9/11
and the famous guy telling the worlds investigative journalists dont look
any closer at 9/11
Assange states everyones email is being read and accordingly advises
leaking the old fashioned way with a drop to the post office box
NO-no-no Julian Assange, it does not work like that unless you wish to do
intelligence agencies like the CIA a big favor- the daily 1.6 billion
everyones email collected by American intelligence cannot be read, it is a
logistical impossibility. Text extraction computing software is imperfect and
pick ups by far more false leads than real leads and read mails of those
people singled out for surveilliance [like myself] can read by more than one
countrys agencies, including law enforcement [a fact for which I am
personally pleased] and that is how, among other things, Italian law
enforcement can bring down a criminal CIA rendition
It is actually much easier for intelligence agencies to track the physical mail
system. It leaves tangible clues: postmarks, finger prints, DNA.. whereas

the experienced someone who is keen not to be monitored or discovered

while whistle-blowing crimes [unlike myself, I do not need to conceal my
identity] working inside/outside the system will leak with a untraceable to
the source used or stolen laptop at a wireless caf where one can create
an online email account in minutes, attach, upload and send documents in
a few minutes more, abandon the mail account, wipe the drive, destroy and
dispose of [dumpster] the computer and never frequent that particular
wireless caf again. Another means is upload from a parked car sitting in
the street, having found a random open wireless signal and DO NOT leak
to WikiLeaks
Trained intelligence people know this. Trained counter intelligence people
would also want Julian Assange putting out the word to use physical a P.O.
Box to leak, so they can better track leaks to their source. Assange profiles
for CIA and by the way, someone else who thinks Assange is in bed with
intelligence is Wayne Madsen
Another hole in Assanges story is the frequent moving and safe houses
coupled with his statement Is it in the interest of the CIA to assassinate
me? Maybe. But who would do it? Firstly, frequently moving largely
increases the successful possibility of assassins with the CIAs resourcesparticulary moving from country to country with close CIA ties (Britain for
instance) because it vastly enlarges the range of possibilities for
coordinating a successful hit operation. But if you are CIA as I expect
Assange is, it is not a problem in any case except again, everyone proving
sympthetic to Assange by providing safe houses has given themselves up
to intelligence and does not even realize it- on top of the absurdity of
believing the safe houses would not be monitored and known by MI5 & and
MI6 who would in any case be interested and has information sharing
arrangement with CIA.
By comparison, I had confined myself to approximately a 2 square km area
with limited access for a year and a half in a country with a healthy
suspicion of British intelligence and by extension the CIA. Accordingly Id
made it exceedingly difficult for hostiles to make a hit without detection
and, insofar as Assanges who would do it? one only has to read my
blogs. A Sabrina DeSousa would do it. A Gary Berntsen would do it. And
they would do with an agency or corporate support team. The very fact of

Assanges being alive and running freely around Britain demonstrates the
CIAs actual disinterest in taking him out of public circulation with a hit AND
the Pentagons disinterest in bringing Assange into custody for questioning.
As for Assanges not caring about sources but only the documents
authenticity, one only need read how the CIA uses authentic documents to
pursue a public disinformation [psy-ops] agenda through leaks with the socalled Pentagon Papers as detailed by a former Colonel of Intelligence
who worked supporting the CIA [Colonel Fletcher Prouty, author of The
Secret Team]
I compare Julian Assange to Daniel Ellsberg and that is NOT a good thing
despite popular legend. Who is Daniel Ellsberg? According to a former top
USA intelligence officer [L Fletcher Prouty] writing about the so-called
Pentagon Papers
As you may recall, this treasure trove of TOP SECRET papers was
delivered to the New York Times, and other newspapers in mid- June,
1971, by a then-unknown Hippie of that period. His name was Daniel
Ellsberg. What few people have learned since that time is the fact that ..
Daniel Ellsberg .. had worked in the office of International Security Affairs
(ISA)
So, Daniel Ellsberg, purported American dissident, got his start as an
American intelligence officer. And? Leaked the Pentagon Papers which
Colonel Prouty describes as:
unreliable, inaccurate and marred by serious omissions. They are a
contrived history
Colonel Prouty goes on to note:
that I had written parts of some of them [Pentagon Papers] proves that
they were not genuine Pentagon papers, because my work at that time was
devoted to support of the CIA
The above [quotes] are from The Secret Team, a suppressed history of
the CIA

Now, some 40 years later, we have the Pentagon in a manhunt for the
founder of wikileaks and this is just too rich to pass upAnyone who has ever encountered the intelligence community from the
inside [worked there] is bound to be a little freaked out, is probably
paranoid, and likely demented if they did not get out at first opportunity after
realizing just what goes on there, and then it is likely too late. My blogs are
a little bit freaked out, somewhat paranoid, and absolutely demented at
times but I try for the most part to keep demented limited to satire for the
sake of my overall mental health ;o) All going to my past in intelligence.
Because in intelligence, particularly when it comes to counter-intelligence
and psy-ops [psychological operations] truth is a relative thing and the
problem with that is, truth being relative IS NOT healthy. It is not healthy for
people and it is not healthy for society
Now, we have a cyber-age repeat of the Pentagon Papers. What did the
Pentagon Papers episode serve to do? A professionally engineered
psychological operation, it shifted, for the public consumption, responsibility
for the colossal intelligence and policy failures in Vietnam, from the CIA to
the military. In the end, only the CIA and their close friends in the military/
industrial complex who profit from war, and those promoted CIA agents in
military service cover, benefited. Accountability never happened
It really is that simple. Former [or current] intelligence agent Daniel
Ellsberg, unwitting or witting, is the CIA generated myth on whose axis that
shift of responsibility was accomplished via the Pentagon Papers
Replay Afghanistan & wikileaks:
CIA agent Robert Gates [from the operational sector, rose to be director of
CIA or DCI] took over Department of Defense for George W Bush and the
incredibly narcissist [blind] Obama kept him on despite Gates relationship
bordering on gay love with the Bush family. So what would you expect?
They are all dirt-bags, left and right, so now the neo-con CIA via the Gates
religious extremist controlled military, is going to release TONS of
[legitimate] dirt on the Obama foreign policy just in time to influence mid-

term elections to the joy and satifaction of all lovers of family Bush or, that
is to say to the purile satisfaction of closet-sadistic-gay jesus is coming
neo-con philosophers and followers. All nicely arranged by the same
people [CIA] who have sent Afghanistan to hell in a handbasket to
undermine their president with their uniquely loyal to jesus patriotism, and
they will present themselves as smelling like a rose by comparison to what
theyve just pinned with real documents on the [legitimately dirt-bag]
Democrats
Here is how it profiles:
Julian Assange, wikileaks founder, got his start in the Chaos Computer
Club or CCC
Chaos Computer Club reeks of intelligence agency penetration,
manipulation and control. If there were ever an open field invitation for CIA,
KGB, STASI, et cetera, playing the game, this is it. Wikileaks credibility,
from a standpoint of secure against counter-intelligence operations, dies
right here, with the CCC association
In 1989, the CCC was peripherally involved in the first cyberespionage
case to make international headlines. A group of German hackers led by
Karl Koch, who was loosely affiliated with the CCC, was arrested for
breaking into US government and corporate computers and selling
operating-system source code to the Soviet KGB. -wikipedia
Now, this, above, is a bit of fine information.. or not. Intelligence, and
particularly counter-intelligence, often take advantage of a truth, to create a
lie
By the time of this incident [above] senior CIA operative Duane Clarridge
had established a counter-terror program in western europe over the
same period of time CCC had seen its operations established and grow.
You can bet your bottom dollar CCC has the acronym CIA and the name
Clarridge written into it. Chaos makes a fine third initial. That is likely why
those guys who played ball with KGB were caught and arrested. Freelance
is fine until you play ball with people we [CIA] may not like. Many CCC

participants would not know of agency penetration, manipulation and at

times, control
Meanwhile a felon/hacker who under any circumstance would be under
surveilance by the USA authorities has come forward and warned the
military about a military intelligence soldiers leak to wikileaks including
160,000 pages of classified diplomatic cables and military documents the
soldier has described as criminal and pointing to Hillary Clinton
particularly. This one, folks, stinks to high, high heaven. I find it difficult to
sympathise with the soldier who most likely was profiled to leak [has a
conscience] and deliberately provided opportunity to leak select for him
documents by even worse neo-con criminals [yeah, they come even worse
than Hillary although she is REALLY BAD], because:
CIA stooge |c|i|a|stoj|
noun
1 professional- an ignorant person who unknowingly serves to support or
assist CIA in doing unpleasant work : he fell for that CIA psy-ops act and
now are their manipulated stooge [aka fish or sucker]
element of a psy-ops counter-intelligence operation employed to release
damaging documentation in deliberately engineered context to undermine
political enemies, employing persons ignorant of being used, effectively a
plant for a snitch [similar to bait and switch]