Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instituto Superior Tcnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DTU Building 425, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
c
Department of Engineering, University of Reading, Box 225, Reading RG6 6AY, UK
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 3 June 2014
Received in revised form 21 July 2014
Accepted 23 August 2014
Available online 2 September 2014
Keywords:
Bulk metal forming
Formability
Stress triaxiality
Finite element modelling
Experimentation
a b s t r a c t
This paper revisits formability in bulk metal forming in the light of fundamental concepts of plasticity,
ductile damage and crack opening modes. It proposes a new test to appraise the accuracy, reliability and
validity of fracture loci associated with crack opening by tension and out-of-plane shear under loading
conditions different from those found in conventional tests for bulk formability based on cylindrical,
tapered and anged specimens.
The new formability test consists of expanding rings of various wall thicknesses with a stepped conical
punch and allows investigating the onset of failure by cracking under three-dimensional states of stress
subjected to various magnitudes of stress triaxiality.
The presentation is supported by nite element analysis and experimentation in aluminium AA2030T4 and results show that failure by fracture under three-dimensional loading conditions can be easily
and effectively characterized in the space of equivalent strain to fracture and stress triaxiality.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Failure by surface or internal cracking in bulk metal forming is
caused by the accumulation of ductile damage within regions that
are highly strained due to extensive plastic ow. Apart from special
purpose processes such as the shearing of bars and bar sections,
where cracks are needed to cut material, the occurrence of cracks
is generally undesirable and should be prevented during process
design.
Currently-available nite element computer programs may aid
this objective but appropriate input data regarding a relevant fracture locus is crucial for successfully predicting the onset of cracking
in bulk metal forming. The conditions at fracture depend on the
interaction between plasticity theory, the circumstances under
which each crack opening mode will develop and microstructural
ductile damage mechanics.
In a recent paper Martins et al. (2014) developed an analytical framework to characterize failure by fracture in metal forming
under plane stress conditions and concluded that surface cracking
in bulk forming can occur under two different opening modes (i)
tensile and (ii) out-of-plane shear, respectively the same as modes
288
C.M.A. Silva et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 215 (2015) 287298
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of fracture loci in bulk metal forming in the (a and c) principal strain space and in the (b and d) space of equivalent strain to fracture and
stress triaxiality. (a and b) Linear fracture locus associated to crack opening by out-of-plane shear (mode III); (c and d) bilinear fracture locus resulting from combination of
crack opening by out-of-plane shear (mode III) and by tension (mode I).
C.M.A. Silva et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 215 (2015) 287298
2. Experimentation
2.1. Mechanical and friction characterization
The investigation was performed on commercial aluminium
AA2030-T4 in the as-supplied condition. The material was provided as solid rods with 35 mm diameter and the stressstrain
curve was determined by means of compression tests carried out on
Rastegaev cylindrical test specimens at room temperature (Fig. 2a),
using a hydraulic testing machine (Instron SATEC 1200kN). The at
recesses that were machined at the upper and lower ends of the
specimens (refer to the schematic cross section in Fig. 2a) were
lled with a molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) based lubricant with
the purpose of preventing barrelling by retaining the lubricant at
the contact interface between the tool and the specimens during
compression.
Friction at the contact interface between the tool and the various bulk formability test specimens that are described in Section 2.2
was estimated by means of ring compression tests. The ratio of the
outer diameter, the inner diameter and the thickness of each ring
specimen was 6:3:2. No lubricant was used in the ring compression tests because the bulk formability tests were mainly performed
under dry lubrication conditions.
Friction was characterized by means of the law of constant friction = mk and the friction factor m was estimated as m = 0.2 after
289
25
30
25
5
Dry
t1
30
30
Dry
cr1
25
25
Dry
c2
25
25
MoS2
c1
Cylindrical
30
30
Dry
c3
Cylindrical rotated
Tapered
25
35
25
5
Dry
t2
20
35
25
5
Dry
f1
C.M.A. Silva et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 215 (2015) 287298
Flanged
290
w
,
w0
z = 2 = ln
h
h0
(1)
The procedure to determine the strain loading paths up to fracture in ring expansion with a stepped conical punch was performed
by inverse identication of strains at locations U and T of Fig. 3b
using nite element analysis. This was necessary because not only
it is difcult to engrave rectangular grids on the inner ring surfaces
but also they vanish during expansion by means of the stepped
conical punch.
Numerical simulation of the bulk formability tests was performed with the nite element computer program I-form. The
program was developed by the authors and is built upon the irreducible nite element ow formulation, which is based on the
following variational principle (extended to account for frictional
effects),
dV + 12 K
H
D
d
t
Lubrication
Identication
Geometry
Table 1
Geometry and lubrication conditions utilized in conventional bulk formability tests. All dimensions are in mm.
V
2v dV
V
Ti ui dS +
|ur |
Sf
f dur dS
(2)
The symbol in (2) denotes the effective stress, is the effective strain rate, V is the volumetric strain rate, K is a large positive
constant imposing the incompressibility constraint, Ti and ui are
the surface tractions and velocities on ST , ur and f are the relative
velocity and the friction shear stress (according to the law of constant friction f = mk) on the contact interface Sf between tools and
test specimens, and V is the control volume limited by the surfaces
SU and ST . Further information on the nite element ow formulation and the computer program I-form can be found elsewhere
(Nielsen et al., 2013).
The numerical simulation of the bulk formability tests based
on cylindrical, tapered, anged and ring specimens made use of
two dimensional nite element models and axisymmetric linear
quadrilateral elements that took advantage of rotational symmetry
conditions whereas the numerical simulation of the bulk formability tests based on rotated cylindrical test specimens made use
of three dimensional nite element models and linear hexahedral
elements (Fig. 4).
The numerical simulation of the transitions between tension
and out-of-plane shear dominated crack opening modes in bulk
metal forming that will also be presented in Section 4 involved
three dimensional nite element modelling and discretization of
the anged test specimen by means of linear hexahedral elements.
C.M.A. Silva et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 215 (2015) 287298
291
Table 2
Geometry and lubrication conditions utilized in ring expansion with a stepped conical punch. All dimensions are in mm.
Geometry
Specimens
H
D
d
Lubrication
Identication
15
12
10
Dry
r1
w0
t0
(a)
15
15
10
Dry
r2
15
17.5
10
Dry
r3
15
20
10
Dry
r4
15
25
10
Dry
r5
15
30
10
Dry
r6
(b)
Fig. 3. Experimental strain pairs in bulk formability tests. Schematic representation of the grids that were utilized for measuring the major and minor surface strains in case
of conventional bulk formability specimens; Locations U and T to perform inverse nite element identication of the major and minor strains in case of ring expansion
with a stepped conical punch.
Fig. 4. Finite element discretization of the bulk formability test specimens that are identied (from a to f) as c3, cr1, t1 and f1 in Table 1 and r5 and r1 in Table 2. All nite
element models apart from (b) took advantage of rotational symmetry conditions.
292
C.M.A. Silva et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 215 (2015) 287298
Fig. 5. Experimental and nite element predicted evolution of the load with displacement for the (a) cylindrical and (b) anged test specimens that are identied
as c3 and f1 in Table 1.
DCL =
0
1
d ,
DST =
0
m
d
(3)
C.M.A. Silva et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 215 (2015) 287298
293
Fig. 6. Finite element estimates of accumulated damage at the onset of fracture for cylindrical c3, tapered t1 and t2 and anged f1 test specimens according to (a)
normalized CockcroftLatham and (b) McClintock stresstriaxiality based ductile fracture criteria.
pairs on the free surfaces of the specimens where cracks are triggered fall on a bilinear fracture locus consisting of two straight lines
of slopes 1/2 and 1 related to crack opening by out-of-plane
shear (mode III) and by tension (mode I). The transitions from crack
opening mode I to mode III that were observed in the bulk formability tests performed with tapered and anged specimens correspond
to strain loading paths in the region of the light grey circle imprinted
at the intersection between the two linear loci (Fig. 7a).
The transformation of the bilinear fracture locus from the principal strain space to the space of equivalent strain to fracture and
stress triaxiality is shown in Fig. 7b. The hyperbolic curve corresponding to fracture locus in mode III was determined by tting
the points resulting from combinations of the strain pairs at fracture, which are almost identical to those obtained by nite elements
(refer to Fig. 7a), with the corresponding values of stress triaxiality that were obtained by nite element analysis. This procedure
avoided assumptions on proportional loading and allowed plotting
the hyperbolic black solid curve that is shown in Fig. 7b.
The hyperbolic grey solid curve corresponding to fracture locus
in mode I was determined by means of an alternative analyticalexperimental procedure that assumes proportional, isotropic strain
loading paths ( = dz /d = z / ) at the free surface locations of the
specimens where cracks are triggered.
The proposed procedure makes use of the Y-intercept where the
experimental fracture locus in mode I crosses the -axis (Fig. 7a)
and the main reason for not using a procedure similar to that
employed in the hyperbolic curve corresponding to fracture locus
in mode III was due to the fact that the number of available fracture
points corresponding to crack opening by mode I was below critical to perform an adequate curve tting. In fact, only two points
corresponding to tapered t2 and anged f1 test specimens are
available.
Under these circumstances, by expressing the effective stress
and the increment of effective strain d under plane stress conditions ( r = 0) as follows,
=
2 + z2 z
2
d =
3
d2 + d2z + d dz
(4)
(1 + )
m
=
3 1 + + 2
(5)
Then, by combining the above equations with the experimental value of the Y-intercept in Fig. 7a, one obtains the following
294
C.M.A. Silva et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 215 (2015) 287298
2
2 Y
(f + zf ) =
3 m /
3(m /)
(6)
Fig. 8. Cylindrical c3 test specimen showing a crack opening mode III (out-of-plane shear) and tapered t2 and anged f1 test specimens showing transitions from crack
opening mode I to mode III. The black arrows stand for magnication, the leftmost white arrow indicates transition from crack opening mode I to mode III in case of the
tapered t2 test specimen and the rightmost white arrow indicates the location of crack initiation in case of the anged f1 test specimen.
C.M.A. Silva et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 215 (2015) 287298
295
Fig. 9. Failure of the anged f1 test specimen under crack opening modes I and III. (a) Photographs showing the surfaces of fracture corresponding to opening modes I and
III. (b) Three dimensional nite element estimate of accumulated damage according to McClintock stresstriaxiality based ductile fracture criteria at the onset of fracture
(mode I). The white arrow indicates the location of the crack initiation. (c) Three dimensional nite element estimate of the effective strain rate (s1 ) at the onset of cracking
by out-of-plane shear (mode III) into the core of the specimen after nishing crack propagation by tension (mode I) in the ange.
296
C.M.A. Silva et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 215 (2015) 287298
Fig. 10. Experimental and nite element predicted evolution of the load with displacement for ring expansion with a stepped conical punch performed in test
specimens that are identied as r2 and r6 in Table 2. Details show cracks at an
intermediate stage of deformation.
In connection to this, it is worth mentioning that the abovementioned decrease in the load growth rate at point B does not
occur for the nite element predicted evolution of the load with displacement because the two-dimensional numerical models used in
this investigation do not include crack triggering and propagation
features.
Fig. 11. Finite element estimates of accumulated damage at the onset of fracture for ring expansion with a stepped conical punch (specimens r2 (top) and r6 (bottom) of
Table 2) according to (a) normalized CockcroftLatham and (b) McClintock stresstriaxiality based ductile fracture criteria.
C.M.A. Silva et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 215 (2015) 287298
Fig. 12. Failure by fracture in ring expansion with a stepped conical punch (locations
U and T). Fracture loci in the space of equivalent strain to fracture and stress
triaxiality; fracture loci in the principal strain space.
and cylindrical surfaces of the ring expansion specimens (location T in Fig. 11). This result is different from experimental
observations and may be attributed to the fact that cracks are
not opened by tension (mode I) but, instead, by out-of-plane
shear (mode III). In fact, only the thinnest ring test specimen
(with 1 mm wall thickness and identied as r1) seems able
to crack under opening mode I due to its loading path in
the space of equivalent strain to fracture and stress triaxiality
(Fig. 12a). The result obtained for the thinnest ring test specimen r1 is also consistent with the radial crack propagation path
that was observed along the wall thickness of the deformed test
specimens.
Fig. 12b shows the strain loading paths corresponding to locations U in the principal strain space for the entire set of ring
expansion specimens that are listed in Table 2. As seen, there is no
correlation between the fracture locus determined from conventional bulk formability tests and the strain loading paths resulting
from ring expansion with a stepped conical punch. This is because
the straight lines with slopes 1 and 1/2 corresponding to
modes I and III require cracks to be triggered on free surfaces
under plane stress loading conditions. In fact, ring expansion with a
stepped conical punch or open die forging or extrusion fail by fracture under three-dimensional loading and different magnitudes of
stress triaxiality.
As a result of this, the principal strain space and the fracture
forming limit diagrams cannot be utilized to analyze these bulk
forming processes. Instead, the space of equivalent strain to fracture and stress triaxiality should be employed.
5. Conclusions
Failure by fracture in bulk metal forming was analyzed
by combining the fundamental concepts of plasticity, ductile
297
damage and crack opening modes of fracture mechanics. Experiments with aluminium AA2030-T4 combined with nite element
modelling and analysis of the morphology of the fracture surfaces showed that bilinear fracture loci promotes transitions
between tension and out-of-plane shear opening modes as cracks
propagate from the outer surfaces to the inward volume of the
specimens.
The new proposed ring expansion test performed with a stepped
conical punch proved adequate to replicate three-dimensional
stress loading under a wide magnitude of stress triaxiality by varying the wall thickness of the specimens. The resulting loading paths
in the space of equivalent strain to fracture and stress triaxiality showed excellent agreement with the fracture loci obtained
by means of independent bulk formability tests performed with
cylindrical, rotated cylindrical, tapered and anged specimens.
This points to the suitability of the space of equivalent strain
to fracture and stress triaxiality to model the onset of internal
cracks in bulk forming parts subjected to three-dimensional stress
states.
In contrast, the principal strain space and the fracture forming
limit diagram are not suitable to investigate the onset of cracking
under three-dimensional stress loading conditions because they
require cracking to occur on free surfaces under plane stress loading
conditions.
Ductile damage criteria also proved adequate to reveal the location and the amount of deformation for a crack to be triggered
in conventional bulk formability tests performed with cylindrical, rotated cylindrical (CockcroftLatham), tapered and anged
(McClintock) specimens but provides unclear and dubious predictions in the case of ring expansion tests. This justies the need to
further analyze the accuracy, validity and reliability of the space of
equivalent strain to fracture and stress triaxiality to provide information of the onset of cracking in case of open die forging and
extrusion, among other processes.
Acknowledgment
The work was partially supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under the research contract
PEst-OE/EME/LA0022/2011.
References
Atkins, A.G., Mai, Y.W., 1985. Elastic & Plastic Fracture. Chichester, Ellis Horwood,
UK.
Bai, Y., Wierzbicki, T., 2010. Application of extended MohrCoulomb criterion to
ductile fracture. Int. J. Fract. 161, 120.
Bao, Y., Wierzbicki, T., 2004. A comparative study on various ductile crack formation
criteria. J. Eng. Mater. Technol.Trans. ASME 126, 314324.
Bruschi, S., Altan, T., Banabic, D., Bariani, P.F., Brosius, A., Cao, J., Ghiotti, A.,
Khraisheh, M., Merklein, M., Tekkaya, A.E., 2014. Testing and modelling of material behaviour and formability in sheet metal forming. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol.
63, 727749.
Cockcroft, M.G., Latham, D.J., 1986. Ductility and the workability of metals. J. Inst.
Metals 96, 3339.
Erman, E., Kuhn, H.A., Fitzsimons, G., 1983. Novel test specimens for workability
testing. In: Compression Testing of Homogeneous Materials and Composites
ASTM STP 808. ASTM International, Baltimore, USA, pp. 279.
Gouveia, B.P.P.A., Rodrigues, J.M.C., Martins, P.A.F., 1996. Fracture predicting in bulk
metal forming. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 38, 361372.
Kobayashi, S., 1970. Deformation characteristics and ductile fracture of 1040 steel
in simple upsetting of solid cylinders and rings. J. Eng. Ind. Trans. ASME 92,
391398.
Kudo, H., Aoi, K., 1967. Effect of compression test condition upon fracturing of a
medium carbon steel. J. Jpn. Soc. Technol. Plast. 8, 1727.
Kuhn, H.A., Lee, P.W., Erturk, T., 1973. A fracture criterion for cold forming. J. Eng.
Mater. Technol. Trans. ASME 95, 213218.
Li, Y., Luo, M., Gerlach, J., Wierzbicki, T., 2010. Prediction of shear-induced fracture
in sheet metal forming. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 210, 18581869.
Martins, P.A.F., Bay, N., Tekkaya, A.E., Atkins, A.G., 2014. Characterization of fracture
loci in metal forming. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 83, 112123.
McClintock, F.A., 1968. A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes. J. Appl.
Mech. Trans. ASME 35, 363371.
298
C.M.A. Silva et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 215 (2015) 287298
Muscat-Fenech, C.M., Arndt, S., Atkins, A.G., 1996. The determination of fracture
forming limit diagrams from fracture toughness. Sheet Metal 1996. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, University of Twente 1, The
Netherlands, pp. 249260.
Nielsen, C.V., Zhang, W., Alves, L.M., Bay, N., Martins, P.A.F., 2013. Modeling of Thermo-Electro-Mechanical Manufacturing Processes with