Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maheshwar Ramakrishnan
GAPR11IT058
Shailesh Karri
Designation: Professor
GAPR11IT081
16-Mar-12
ON
Maheshwar Ramakrishnan
GAPR11IT058
Shailesh Karri
GAPR11IT081
Designation: Professor
Corporate Mentor
Name: Mr Prantik Mazumdar
Designation: Partner
16-Mar-12
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to first acknowledge our sincere gratitude to Prof Subba Iyer for
connecting us with Happy Marketer and providing us with this project and an
invaluable learning opportunity. His guidance and assistance helped shape the
direction of the project.
Further, we wish to thank each of the Partners at Happy Marketer Private Ltd, Mr
Prantik Mazumdar, Mr Rachit Dayal and Mr David Liem for their invaluable
support and candor throughout the project. Together, they made the project a
fun experience and invited us to work on their ongoing projects which added
futher insights into the project and helped shape it holistically.
We also wish to thank Prof Veena Maam for all her support throughout the ALP
process whenever we approached her.
Sincerely:Maheshwar Ramakrishnan
GAPR11IT058
Shailesh Karri
GAPR11IT081
16-Mar-12
DECLARATION
We hereby declare that the matter included in this ALP report titled Positioning
Happy Marketer Services to clients for Impact is the result of study and
interviews carried out by us. We further declare that this is our original work and
has not been published anywhere before.
This Project Work has been carried out for the sole purpose of submission in
partial fulfillment of Global Masters in Business Administration (GMBA) at SP Jain
School of Global Management, Singapore.
The above is true to the best of our knowledge and understanding.
We have read, understood and signed the Code of Ethics in accordance with
the IIP Guidelines.
Project Team:
16-Mar-12
MaheshwarRamakrishnan, ITM
GAPR11IT058
K. V. Shailesh, ITM
GAPR11IT081
16-Mar-12
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 8
Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................... 9
1.1. The Context ............................................................................................................................ 9
1.2. Marketing ............................................................................................................................... 9
1.3. Digital Marketing .................................................................................................................. 9
1.3.1. Social Media Advertising ................................................................................................ 10
1.3.2. Mobile Advertising.......................................................................................................... 11
1.3.3. Display Advertising ........................................................................................................ 11
1.3.4. Search Engine Marketing ................................................................................................ 11
1.3.5. Web Analytics ................................................................................................................. 11
1.4. Happy Marketer .................................................................................................................. 12
7. Appendix ....................................................................................................... 35
7.1. Application of Framework ................................................................................................. 35
7.1.1 Telecommunications ......................................................................................................... 35
7.1.2 Hospitality ........................................................................................................................ 36
7.1.3. Education ........................................................................................................................ 37
7.1.3. Banking ........................................................................................................................... 38
16-Mar-12
Executive Summary
The concept of direct and one-to-one marketing is still the most effective mode of
reaching out to the customer even though a number of innovations and progress has
been made in the field of Marketing. However, with rising costs and inflation, direct
marketing proves to be an expensive means of spreading a brands reach. Digital
Marketing plays a vital role in bridging this chasm. The best fit between a customer and
a brand is when the brand is able to reach the customer at the most opportune moment
when the customer is in need of a particular product or experience. Brands should
perceive the Internet as a huge mall where each surfer is a shopper and can be
influenced at every click. To get an idea of the speed of information transactions on the
Internet; in 60 seconds there are 694,445 search queries on Google, 510,040 comments
posted on Facebook, more than 98,000 tweets, close to 600 new videos on YouTube, and
13,000 iPhone app downloads.
The customer lies at the heart of any marketing campaign. Therefore we start with the
customer. The customer today is well aware and connected to rest of the customer
community. Its not possible to bluff the costumer into buying anything anymore. So, we
try to understand what drives customer decision-making. With inspiration from a HBR
article we categorize the customer decision making into 6 phases. Then we do a deep
dive into each phase and related customer activities.
Further, we look at the digital marketing industry to identify cases that are unique and
innovative. This is to build perspective into technological innovations as well as how
brands are adopting various strategies to influence customer decision-making. We have
identified 4 broad industry verticals viz. tertiary education, banking, hospitality and
telecom services for this analysis. The choice of these verticals is to address Happy
Marketers clients primary areas of business.
We further crystallized learnings from the various case studies and in combination with
our secondary research and industry analysis, we generated a framework that aimed to
address four key challenges of the report positioning against competition, leveraging
digital marketing against competitors, estimating ROI from digital campaigns and the
lack of awareness of digital marketing and how it fit into the overall marketing strategy
of an organization.
The proposed framework revolves around the paying customer and the various stages
one would follow while purchasing a product or adopting an experience. The six stages
were Awareness, Evaluate, Purchase, Use, Advocate and Bond. For each of the stages,
we identified customer tasks and recommended a firms digital strategy. Further to
measure the firms performance in each of the six stages, we incorporated quantitative
metrics into the framework.
The framework was further tested with companies such as OCBC, UOB, DBS, NTU,
NUS, StarHub, Singtel, M1, Marina Bay Sands, Raffles Hotel and Fullerton Hotel. Each
of the companies in the four verticals were scored and benchmarked with the highest
performing brand.
16-Mar-12
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1. The Context
Internet and world: It is hard to imagine the world without Internet and the World Wide
Web. From its inception in the 1960s (ARPANET, for defense) the Internet has pretty
much touched our lives in all possible ways. From the Hollywood movies like Matrix to
Economic downturn of 2008 it has played a vital role. The web has become an integral
part of the human ecosystem on this planet.
Looking at the evolution of the World Wide Web we can see that we have made a
phenomenal progress in bringing the world online. From a content centric model the
web had evolved to a search centric model. Now, again the online businesses are
evolving and being people-centric.
1.2. Marketing
The growth in size of national and international economies during the industrial
revolution led to birth of modern marketing. The technological advancements have led
to the emergence of new technologies and marketing channels. The invention of
Gutenberg's printing press in 1450 enabled mass-production of flyers and brochures.
1836 saw the first paid ad in newspaper. Advertising moved from print to radio and
television in 1922 and 1941 respectively. With Internet and the advent of E-Commerce in
1970s marketing reached new heights. The Internet has also empowered the customer
with unlimited knowledge. Today, customers are exactly aware of what they want and
its not easy to fool them into buying anything.
16-Mar-12
Social
Media
Mobile
Display
Search
SEO/SEM
Direct advertising based on network of friends: This is the most effective form of
social media advertisings as it builds immense credibility and trust into a
product one of your friend has just bought. The Facebook beacon project is an
example off this. However, there has been some controversy regarding this type
of advertising as it exploits personal relations for commercial purposes and
raises privacy concerns
Direct advertising placed on social networking site: This is very similar to the
conventional
ntional display banner ads. For e.g. on the right column on Facebook site as
bricks. But, social media display ads have the advantage of using user
demographic information for targeted advertising. Also, many application
developers put ads on their applica
applications
tions (which are part of the social network)
Indirect advertising by creating groups or fan pages: This is a novel concept
where interest groups or company fan pages are created on social networks.
Once a good subscriber base is build it can be effecti
effectively
vely used to create a
marketing contest, understand customer sentiment, launch new product, create
conversations on the brand etc. This can turn into a very effective self propelled
marketing channel
16-Mar-12
10
16-Mar-12
11
Chart 1: Market share analysis of the various analytics tool across four verticals
16-Mar-12
12
Problem
Identification
Market
Analysis
Expert
Interviews
Objective
Definition
Literature
review
Conceptual
Framework
Report
16-Mar-12
13
to the prospective clients how digital marketing fits into the big picture and
online clicks can be converted to in-store footfalls.
Measuring ROI from these campaigns: The ultimate question any business head
would ask before investing into any opportunity would be what would be the
ROI?. As talked in the introduction section, linking digital marketing efforts to
numbers, which matter to the business, is a big challenge. Marketing firms are
still struggling with metrics, which can precisely measure the performance.
Mapping digital marketing to overall strategy: Pitching digital marketing
services with the intent of selling is what almost all marketing firms do. But,
understanding the clients business, their current state and telling them exactly
what marketing strategy should be adopted in order to get the best results would
be a value proposition. If Happy Marketer has the ability to quantify the
positioning of a prospective client with respect to other competitors then it
would create immense value to both parties.
A strategic conceptual model for Happy Marketers to take it to their clients and
map their existing campaigns and services to the model.
16-Mar-12
14
16-Mar-12
15
A catchy video that subtly conveys the message of the brand and its value
An interactive element that users can involve with
A tag line that communicates value or promotions
16-Mar-12
16
Analysis
Description: This Ad is more of a game
that allows users to burst pillows and
have fun. Once the pillow fight is over
there is a pop-up
up directing to the room
booking page
Observations: Primary goal is not
n room
booking but letting users have fun
3.1.2. Evaluate
The Evaluate phase is the stage when a customer is aware of the presence of a brand.
He/she narrows down to a few brands for a given service or product and tries to
evaluate the pros and cons of them to make the ultimate buying decision. This makes it
important for brands to focus on this phase to become the brand of choice for customer.
The presence of Internet and Web 2.0 has given voice to the customer and an incredible
channel for the new customers
tomers to interact with the existing customers to get reviews
about the product. There are online blogs, discussion forums, Facebook fan pages and
YouTube channels where consumers can listen to what these companies and their
existing customers speak. Now, what existing customers speak can be either good or
bad for the companies. So, it becomes all the more important for the companies not to
ignore these channels and actively engage in the conversations to understand the
expectations and concerns their custo
customers
mers have. A balance in spending in these avenues
is a crucial decision since the Evaluate phase is one that ultimately helps decide the
prospective customer to make the Go, No
No-Go decision.
Example: TripAdvisor, Hotel reviews
Analysis
Description:
Allows
llows Facebook login and shows reviews
by Facebook friends. Holds as many as 35
million reviews for 450,000 hotels
Observations:
Users give higher credibility to
hotels reviewed by their Facebook
friends. This leads to better
conversions
Reviewed hotels have
h
higher
bookings
16-Mar-12
17
3.1.3. Purchase
Purchase phase is where the actual conversion takes place. When a user subscribes to a
service or purchases a product. This is most important part of the goal funnel. Research
shows that this is the phase where maximum dropouts happen. Therefore it becomes
important to maximize the convenience of transactions at this phase. Following points
should be kept in mind while managing these transactions:
A simple landing page which calls for an action with least effort
Amount of information requested from the user should be minimal
Auto fill forms should be used to enable easy capture of information
In a multi step sign-in
in or check
check-out,
out, a progress indicator keeps the user aware of
the effort/time required
Analysis
Description:
Applicable for mobile advertising this
feature enables users to directly click a
number (while browsing) to make a
call. E.g. the illustration shows the
search results for Singapore hotels.
When user clicks the phone number
from one of the results it directly makes
the phone make a call.
Observations:
The cost of a click to a website
link is equal to a cost of click to
call
Increased convenience leads to
as high as 5% to 30% increase in
CTR
Description:
Completely customized channel with
large number of common man videos.
This means they do not have few very
popular videos but many videos each
off the viewers may relate to.
Observations:
Touches each viewer at an
emotional level
Reduces the cost of video making
16-Mar-12
18
Analysis
Description:
Boston university collaborates with scvngr
to create location-based
based challenges that go
hand-in-hand
hand with offline real events to
create the ultimate engagement. E.g. for a
hockey
key tournament 2 teams playing on the
field and the corresponding students of the
supporting houses play scavngr online
Observations:
Location based challenges make
integration
with
physical
surroundings possible
There is element of fun, challenge
and team
m effort involved
3.1.5. Advocate
The advocate phase is an outcome of the bond phase. This is when the consumer starts
to talk about the brand, the good and bad experiences. They in turn influence the
customers who are in the evaluate phase of the lifecy
lifecycle.
cle. As mentioned earlier there are
numerous channels online for consumers to express their opinion. Companies need to
actively monitor and participate in these online conversations.
16-Mar-12
19
Analysis
Description:
This is a hotel for art enthusiasts.
Promotes users to write about hotel by
offering them 10% for writing blogs.
Observations:
Active on YouTube, Twitter, Blog
to enable communication with
customers
Focus is not on the services offered
by hotels but on the theme
customers want
3.1.6. Bond
This is the dream stage for every brand. At this stage the customers become lifetime
customers and brand ambassadors. They promote the brand without any kind of
incentives. This stage is typically achieved by repeated satisfact
satisfactory
ory interaction with the
brand, which leads to this bonding, which connects the brand to the customer at an
emotional level.
Example: Bell Canada Social portrait
Analysis
Description:
Bell Canada offers this Facebook
application which uses words from your
Facebook comments and posts to generate
your social portrait
Observations:
Induces fun and promotes sharing
Generates conversation
16-Mar-12
20
Figure 16: Digital Marketing Measurement Framework that aligns a companys online
strategy to the purchase lifecycle of its paying customer and the metrics to follow
4.1. Rationale
In our interviews with the Partners at Happy Marketer, we noted that there were two
key challenges that they faced while positioning their services to their clients for better
impact. The foremost challenge was to gain customer buy-in from corporates who were
mostly from the Gen X era. Digital marketing is a recently established disruption in the
marketing industry and is yet to prove its mettle among traditional marketers who
happen to be the decision makers that digital marketing agencies such as Happy
Marketer deal with every day. Hence, the benefits and the return from digital marketing
campaigns in the view of traditional marketers were still unclear and this posed a
significant challenge.
Secondly, traditional marketers viewed digital marketing as an isolated entity. The idea
of integrating digital and the overall marketing strategy of the brand has still not been
addressed.
Another key challenge was to educate marketing decision makers the impact that digital
marketing campaigns could create and how they could position their brands against
their competitors.
Our project was aimed at understanding these challenges and addressing them with a
conceptual model that would not only help view digital marketing from a new
perspective but also position Happy Marketers services for better impact.
16-Mar-12
21
4.2. Basis
The circular structure of the framework stems from the fact that a customers purchase
decision is usually circular and originates from the awareness phase and one cycle
would end at the bonding phase. A brief explanation of each of the phases was
explained in each of the industry verticals outlined in Section 3.
The strength of this conceptual model lies in the flexibility and the alignment between
the customers purchase lifecycle and the companys online strategy. In this regard, we
can have two broad cases where a company might find itself on the framework.
The first situation is when the company is starting fresh and does not have any digital
media presence. In this regard, the decision makers could start from the paying
customer (the green circle in middle) and work their way up to their online strategy. For
example, without any digital media presence, it is of utmost importance to first build
awareness among customers of their brand and their products. For this the company
would have to adopt an awareness strategy where it would need to post display ads and
invest in search engine marketing to spread its reach. This would be followed by the
evaluation phase where the company would have to drive engagement once customers
are now aware of their product. Subsequently, they would have to entice customers,
drive conversion, which in turn should potentially drive advocacy and bonding among
customers. Without the current digital media presence, it is easy for the company to
embrace the framework and follow the various tasks outlined in order to align with the
paying customer.
On the other hand, a company might find itself with an online strategy already in place.
This particular type of companies could potentially evaluate where their online strategy
is on the framework. For example, if companies find themselves on the Engagement /
Enticement stage in their online strategy, they would need to find out what would
drive conversion. This could be either found out from their competitors relative
positioning on the framework or from the various tasks outlined.
Thus, the framework gives the flexibility to either start with the paying customer (a
student in the case of universities) or from the companys online strategy. It is also
important to note that this framework was postulated keeping in mind Happy
Marketers service offerings so that they would effectively align with the corporate
objectives thereby positioning it for a much larger impact on their potential customers.
16-Mar-12
22
16-Mar-12
23
Figure 17 shows an example when a social media strategy for McDonalds went horribly
wrong when they changed the twitter handle they were promoting from
#MeetTheFarmers to #McDStories. The strategy was to revitalize followers of
McDonalds brand on Twitter, but when they changed the handle from a generic term to
a specific brand, they made the mistake of misaligning their strategy at the Advocate
stage rather than the Bond stage. As a result of this brand miscommunication,
McDonalds brand image took a social med
media
ia thrashing. This more than any other
16-Mar-12
24
4.7. Application
In order to prove the effectiveness of the framework and the metrics used, we wanted to
run it many times across the verticals in which Happy Marketer had a presence
Hospitality, Banking, Telecommunicati
Telecommunications
ons and Tertiary education. We selected three
companies in each vertical and applied the methodology illustrated in Figure 18.
18
16-Mar-12
25
Figure 19: Scores derived from the framework of UOB and OCBC when compared with
DBS as the benchmark
Figure 19 illustrates
ustrates the various scores achieved by the two banks in question. However,
the drawback of using the bar chart was that we were unable to illustrate the weights of
different stages in the customer lifecycle. In this regard, we took the model a step further
furthe
and mapped the scores and weights on the framework that we showed in Figure
16earlier. Figure 20 shows this figure.
16-Mar-12
26
To interpret Figure 20 one needs to first visualize that the higher the distance from the
center of the circle higher the score of the bank. There are three sizes of the various
bubbles in the figure. They refer to the three types of weights that were assigned
assign
in
relation to each other to the different stages of the customer lifecycle. This type of
illustration thus solved our earlier problem of illustrating the scores with the different
weights in the bar chart.
The most interesting aspect of the scoring as
aspect
pect of the framework is the competitive
positioning facet that can be interpreted immediately. It clearly shows that although
OCBC beats out UOB in two of the three critical stages in the framework, its
performance in the Advocate stage is so low compared to UOB, that UOB wins this
round by a whisker. The final scores we arrived at for UOB and OCBC were 40 and 36
respectively as illustrated in our very own speedometer ((Figure 21)!
Figure 21 shows the final scores of UOB vs OCBC with DBS as the benchmark
Our diagnosis and reasoning for the various scores are as follows. OCBCs scores in the
Awareness stage were better than those of UOB OCBCs website had more
impressions, higher traffic from search engines and a much larger index of web pages.
16-Mar-12
27
Once the scores were measured using the various outlined metrics on the framework,
we identified NTU to have a score of 56 compared to SMUs 49.
16-Mar-12
28
Interest
Purchase
Use
Advocate
Bond
Total
Weight
Education(Student)
30
20
10
20
30
30
21%
14%
7%
14%
21%
21%
NTU
84
54
27
43
71
33.33
56
SMU
60.52
57
24
63
56
25.4
49
Table 1: Illustration of the weights and final scores of NTU and SMU using NUS as the
benchmark
We identified that NTU had a much stronger position than SMU relatively on the
Awareness and Advocate stage. After studying the numbers, it is evident that more
people spend more time on NTUs website than SMUs and they also blog about their
experience. This level of user
user-generated
generated content and advocacy was not observed in the
case of SMUs Facebook or twitter pages.
4.7.4. Hospitality
Happy Marketer rates Hospitality as its second most important vertical and hence we
took the numbers and ensured the practicality of the scores by mapping them on the
framework. Figure 23 highlights the results of comparing Raffles Hotel vis--vis
vis
Fullerton Hotel while keeping Marina Bay Sands as the benchmark. A similar
methodology to the previous verticals was followed and the following scores were
arrived at.
There were two key observations from the fundamental nature of the hospitality
vertical. Firstly, we identified that the traffic from search engines for the hotels
h
we
considered was three times higher on average compared to the other verticals studied in
this paper. Although, that maybe the case, the number of pages indexed on the three
hotels studied was quite less and a proper SEO strategy is highly recommended
recommend in order
to canonically position the pages as favorable to search engines.
Our second observation was that people tended to advocate and bond with hotels and
their branding more than other verticals. For example, cognitive features such as pricing,
comfort
ort were secondary as compared to the experience of staying or dining at a specific
hotel. In this regard, we identified Awareness, Evaluate and Advocate as the three most
important phases in the customer lifecycle for the hospitality sector.
16-Mar-12
29
Score
Evaluate
Purchase
Use
Advocate
30
20
30
20
10
23%
15%
23%
15%
8%
StarHub
77
36
15
53
29
M1
50
39.00
28
33
14
Table 2 highlighting the scores of StarHub vis
vis--vis M1
Bond
20
15%
29
21
Total
42
33
4.8. Benefits
The primary rationale behind the framework was to conceptualize a model whereby a
digital marketer from any company would be able to chart his / her marketing plan for
their organization
tion in the short to medium term so as to address their customers at the
best possible customer touch points. When we decided to address these challenges
posed by clients of Happy Marketer, the framework was designed to go further and be
able to provide a score for them that would enable their Business Development
Managers to approach Marketing Heads of corporations to enable buy--ins so as to
improve Happy Marketers revenues. In this regard, we believe that the framework
effectively projects the companys positioning against its competitors. With this critical
information and the recommended steps to follow in order to derive greater economic
value, we feel digital marketers from these companies are better equipped to make
higher ROI decisions.
enefit that stems from the framework is its robustness and ability to set
The second benefit
precise goals for various departments in the organization. For example, advertising and
sales teams could be sitting in two different locations, but the fact that the framework
alignss them with specific metrics helps in identifying and shutting down communication
gaps between the brand and the customer.
16-Mar-12
30
4.9. Limitations
As with any framework, there are limitations based on the various assumptions we have
made. Firstly, we propose that the framework and the weights for each of the four
verticals would not hold true in the case of startups and SMEs. SMEs are more focused
on getting to know their customers and vice versa and at that stage, they would not
worry about customer retention, advocacy or bond. They would plan these stages but
would not be critical as opposed to awareness and evaluate stages. We regard these as
the two most important stages for a startup depending on the maturity of the company
and its position in its industry.
However, we also feel that the framework is robust enough to accommodate changes in
weights. If the company wishes to experiment the different digital marketing strategies
that are available it may do so by simply altering the weights that we have
recommended.
Secondly, the customer lifecycle studied here and in the Harvard / McKinsey paper are
catered to companies with B2C interactions. We feel that when businesses act as
customers as in the case of B2B, the lifecycle theory does not hold true and different
stages could be thought of for those type of interactions. Hence, the framework is
constrained with B2C interactions alone.
Finally, although the framework comprises of 26 different metrics, all of them are
quantitative. The challenge is on to find a tool that can parse human conversations to
study sentiments of a particular product / brand. In this regard, it is highly impossible
to incorporate these qualitative metrics into the framework to study other companies
and the benchmarked company.
Chapter 5: Conclusion
We set out to address the challenges posed by clients to Happy Marketer Pte Ltd and
propose a framework that would conceptualize these and crystallize them into
applications in different verticals that Happy Marketer had a presence in. The
framework that we have proposed is robust to not only incorporate the customer
lifecycle, but also the customer tasks, the brands digital strategy and the various metrics
for each stage in the customer lifecycle process. Once we had a framework to work with,
16-Mar-12
31
The rise of digital marketing and the fall of print advertising enunciate that direct
marketing is the way forward. In the traditional sense, direct marketing would be one
where
re one sales person would address one customer at any point in time. However, in
todays context this has proved to be extremely expensive. To address this gap, digital
marketing plays a vital role. Digital marketing provides the ultimate match between a
customers
ustomers preferences and a companys product offerings. As we observed in a case
study of Harrahs Entertainment in Las Vegas when an individual, Mr Smith enters the
casino along with his family. The case is that he loves playing on the slot machines, loves
lov
Mediterranean food and lets assume theres one Mediterranean restaurant across the
street that is running light on customers. The power to connect these dots is the essence
of personalized digital marketing and thats where the world is headed in our
view.Figure 26 shows Forresters take on this.
Figure 26: Forrester Research showing the way forward for Digital Marketing revenues
16-Mar-12
32
Chapter 6: References
1) Zhao, C. and G.D. Kuh. 2004. Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student
Engagement. Research in Higher Education, Vol. 45, 115-138.
2) "12 Social Media Analytics Tools", http://mindsproutmarketing.com/blog/2010/07/12free-social-media-analytics-tools/, Last retrieved on Feb 28, 2012
3) Reese, S., "Bank of America Qualifies Prospects with Integrated Marketing",
http://www.emarketer.com/blog/index.php/tag/boa-digital-marketing-strategy/, Last
retrieved on Feb 28, 2012
4) "Google Analytics Usage Trends", http://trends.builtwith.com/analytics/GoogleAnalytics, Last retrieved on Feb 28, 2012
5) Osborne, C. (2012), "How do universities use social media successfully?",
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/igeneration/how-do-universities-use-social-mediasuccessfully/15059, Last retrieved on Feb 28, 2012
6) Peters S. (2012), "Banks, Don't Use Twitter for Customer Service",
http://www.enterpriseefficiency.com/author.asp?section_id=1134&doc_id=237676, Last
retrieved on: 14 Mar 2012
7) Ravish. (2011), "CIMB Promotes its Social Media Presence in Malaysia's Largest
Tabloid-Format Newspaper", http://www.visible-banking.com/2011/11/cimb-promotesits-social-media-presence-in-malaysias-largest-tabloid-format-newspaper.html, Last
retreived on 14 Mar 2012
8) Jason, "20 colleges making good use of social media",
http://www.usatodayeducate.com/staging/index.php/the-20-colleges-making-the-bestuse-of-social-media, Last retrieved on Mar 14, 2012
16-Mar-12
33
16-Mar-12
34
35
7. Appendix
7.1. Application of Framework
7.1.1 Telecommunications
Starhub
Stages
Awareness
Impressions
Search Traffic
Reach
Sites Linking In
Pages indexed
100
20
20
20
20
20
M1
Singtel
Benchmark
0.000339
0.000177
0.000436
23%
39%
172
59200
13%
42%
118
5750
14.70%
35%
241
138000
0.000436
0.228
0.42
241
138000
Starhub
15.55
20.00
18.57
14.27
8.58
M1
8.12
11.23
20.00
9.79
0.83
76.9754564 49.9732007
Evaluate
Unique Visitors
Calls
Time on Site
CTR
Blog
100
20
20
20
20
20
Purchase
Goal Funnel
Bounce Rate
Cost per visit
Economic Value
Cost per prospect
100
20
20
20
20
20
4.9
4.7
4.6
250
313
252
4.9
0
313
0
0
20.00 19.1836735
0.00
0
15.97
20.00
0.00
0.00
35.97
34%
17%
28%
0.0073
0.004
0.01
0
17% a
0
0.01
0
0.00
0.58
0.00
14.60
0.00
15.18
28.00
0
0
1.30%
33.33
0.00
20.00
53.33
0.00
0
33.33
33.33
11.5151515
6.09756098
0
0
5.92129126
6.41025641
29.94
4.54545455
6.09756098
0
0
1.10627494
2.66666667
14.42
29.7101449 21.0144928
29.7101449 21.0144928
Use
Response Time
Customer Satisfaction
# issues / customer
100
33.3333333
33.3333333
33.3333333
6.80%
1.30%
4.70%
Advocate
# of comments / post
# of shares / post
# of UGC
# of Unlikes
# talking
# likes / post
100
16.6666667
16.6666667
16.6666667
16.6666667
16.6666667
16.6666667
7.6
1.5
0%
0
653
25
3
1.5
0%
11
4.1
0%
122
10.4
1838
65
11
4.1
0
0
1838
65
Bond
Repeat Purchase
Lifetime Value
Repeat Mentions
100
33.3333333
33.3333333
33.3333333
0.41
0.29
0.46
0.46
23
39.18
20.00
8
16-Mar-12
36
7.1.2 Hospitality
Raffles
Stages
Awareness
Impressions
Search Traffic
Reach
Sites Linking In
Pages indexed
100
20
20
20
20
20
Evaluate
Unique Visitors
Calls
Time on Site
CTR
Blog
100
20
20
20
20
20
Purchase
Goal Funnel
Bounce Rate
Cost per visit
Economic Value
Cost per prospect
100
20
20
20
20
20
Fullerton
MBS
Benchmark
0.000037
0.000014
0.00015
34%
39%
1937
4670
35%
37%
478
2940
34.60%
34%
2106
5910
3.4
3.4
3.8
259
119
228
32%
47%
36%
0.0012
0.00042
0.0042
0.00015
0.35
0.39
2106
5910
3.8
0
259
0
0
0
32% a
0
0.0042
0
Raffles
4.93
19.60
20.00
18.40
15.80
78.73
Fullerton
1.87
20.00
18.97
4.54
9.95
55.33
17.89 17.8947368
0.00
0
20.00
9.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
37.89
27.08
0.00
20.00
0.00
5.71
0.00
25.71
12.78
10.00
0.00
33.33
43.33
33.33
0
18.81
52.14
10.78
2
Use
Response Time
Customer Satisfaction
# issues / customer
100
33.3333333
33.3333333
33.3333333
21
88
1.40%
2.01%
1.60%
5
0
1.40%
Advocate
# of comments / post
# of shares / post
# of UGC
# of Unlikes
# talking
# likes / post
100
16.6666667
16.6666667
16.6666667
16.6666667
16.6666667
16.6666667
0
0
0%
0
780
15
1
1
41%
0
595
22
13.5
17
67%
0
8182
121
13.5
17
67%
0
8182
121
0 1.2345679
0 0.98039216
0 10.2736318
0
0
1.58885358 1.2120101
2.0661157 3.03030303
3.65496928
16.73
Bond
Repeat Purchase
Lifetime Value
Repeat Mentions
100
33.3333333
33.3333333
33.3333333
0.28
0.33
0.42
0.42
22.2222222 26.1904762
22.2222222 26.1904762
16-Mar-12
100
20
20
20
20
20
Evaluate
Unique Visitors
Calls
Time on Site
CTR
Blog
100
20
20
20
20
20
Purchase
Goal Funnel
Bounce Rate
Cost per visit
Economic Value
Cost per prospect
100
20
20
20
20
20
SMU
NUS
Benchmark
0.000588
0.000225
18%
36%
1100
335000
1
17%
37%
551
64700
1
0.001401
16.20%
37%
1710
199000
1
0.001401
0.179
0.37
1710
335000
1
5.9
6.5
7.1
333
358
384
7.1
0
384
0
1
33%
30%
30%
0.0091
0.0049
0.0209
Use
Response Time
Customer Satisfaction
# issues / customer
100
33.3333333
33.3333333
33.3333333
3.26
1.401
1.276
2.90%
2.90%
Advocate
# of comments / post
# of shares / post
# of UGC
# of Unlikes
# talking
# likes / post
100
16.6666667
16.6666667
16.6666667
16.6666667
16.6666667
16.6666667
2
3.14
26%
0
461
21.67
Bond
Repeat Purchase
Lifetime Value
Repeat Mentions
100
33.3333333
33.3333333
33.3333333
0.42
0
30% a
0
0.0209
0
NTU
SMU
8.39
3.21
20.00
19.11
19.46
20.00
12.87
6.44
20.00
3.86
0.00
0.00
80.7189608 52.6252677
NTU
SMU
16.62 18.3098592
0.00
0
17.34
18.65
0.00
0.00
20.00
20.00
53.96
56.96
0.00
18.33
19.73
0.00
8.71 4.68899522
0.00
27.04
24.42
5.40%
1.276
0
2.90%
10.00
0.00
33.33
43.33
30.07
0
33.33
63.40
1.1
1.85
46%
0
462
14.5
4
3.4
0%
0
546
21
4
3.4
0.46
0
546
21.67
8.33333333
15.3921569
16.6666667
0
14.0720391
16.6666667
71.13
4.58333333
9.06862745
16.6666667
0
14.1025641
11.5079365
55.93
0.32
0.24
0.42
33.3333333 25.3968254
33.3333333 25.3968254
16-Mar-12
37
100
20
20
20
20
20
Evaluate
Unique Visitors
Calls
Time on Site
CTR
Blog
100
20
20
20
20
20
Purchase
Goal Funnel
Bounce Rate
Cost per visit
Economic Value
Cost per prospect
100
20
20
20
20
20
OCBC
DBS
Benchmark
UOB
OCBC
0.000588
0.000225
9%
37%
55
4520
12%
36%
237
5920
0.001046
10.10%
43%
298
90300
0.001046
0.12
0.43
298
90300
7.5
3.31
3.12
268
400
243
7.5
0
400
0
1
20.00
0.00
13.40
0.00
0.00
33.40
17%
23%
22%
0.0084
0.0072
0.0363
0
17%
0
0.0363
0
0.00
20.00
0.00
4.63
0.00
24.63
11.24
15.00
17.21
3.69
1.00
48.1445147
UOB
Use
100
Response Time33.3333333
Customer Satisfaction
33.3333333
# issues / customer
33.3333333
2.077
1.401
1.572
2.06%
1.50%
3.00%
Advocate
100
# of comments16.6666667
/ post
# of shares / post
16.6666667
# of UGC
16.6666667
# of Unlikes 16.6666667
# talking
16.6666667
# likes / post 16.6666667
1
2
0
0
216
7
1.5
0
0
0
8
1.3
5
0
0
0
84
17.5
Bond
100
Repeat Purchase
33.3333333
Lifetime Value 33.3333333
Repeat Mentions
33.3333333
0.44
0.46
0.32
1.401
0
1.50%
0.46
4.30
20.00
16.74
15.91
1.31
58.2635145
OCBC
8.826666667
0
20.00
0.00
0.00
28.83
11.81
3.966942149
15.77
17.25
0.00
20.89
38.14
33.33
0
33.33
66.67
3.33333333
0
0
0
42.8571429
6.66666667
52.86
5
0
0
0
1.587301587
1.238095238
7.83
31.884058
31.884058
33.33333333
33.33333333
16-Mar-12
38