Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the Future
By Jason MacDowell, Sudipta Dutta,
Matt Richwine, Sebastian Achilles, and Nicholas Miller
22
1540-7977/152015IEEE
november/december 2015
grid-friendly power plant. These grid-friendly controls, which regulate both active and reactive
power, have been successfully implemented in all major wind manufacturers equipment offerings and
have been proven effective in the field. The examples in this article show the performance of one such
plant control system from GE, WindCONTROL.
Integrating wind power plants into grids is complicated by a number of issues that are related
mainly to wind variability and the electrical characteristics of wind generators. A typical wind plant
functions within the grid as a substantially different generation source than conventional power plants The most
significant difference is that wind energy as a fuel source
is inherently uncontrollable and varies over time. In addition, the electrical characteristics of induction, doubly
fed, and full-convertor wind generators exhibit different disturbance responses and output than conventional
synchronous generators. Historically, the real power
produced by wind plants was allowed to fluctuate with
the available wind, and such plants were not required to
participate in system frequency and voltage regulation or
tie-line interchange control.
Such uncontrolled real power output can have an
impact on the grid, including frequency and voltage variations, and increase regulation or ramping requirements
on conventional generation resources. These impacts are
particularly significant for weak system applications, in
control areas where tie-line interchange is constrained,
and in grids with high wind penetration. Moreover, a wind
plant in which power output is not controlled cannot, by
its nature, participate in the regulation of grid frequency,
so when wind generation displaces conventional generation the burden of providing ancillary services, such as
regulation, falls more heavily on the remaining conventional generators.
Historically, wind plants were also allowed to absorb
reactive power from grids or, at best, to maintain a prescribed power factor. This is a substantially different
operating mode than that required of conventional power
plants, which generally regulate their grid interconnection bus voltages. Without coordinated control of wind
plant reactive power interchange with the grid, a typical
wind plant provided no support or regulation of grid voltage. Furthermore, as already mentioned, voltage variations caused by real power variations were not mitigated.
With low wind generation penetration, these equipment characteristics and integration limitations did not
november/december 2015
have a significant practical impact. However, wind generation is now reaching substantial penetration levels in many
regions, and grid integration has emerged as a potential limit
on further development of this environmentally friendly
resource. Consequently, interconnecting utilities and regulatory agencies are imposing grid codes that demand performance from wind plants similar to what is provided by
conventional power plants that use steam, gas, and hydro
turbines with synchronous generators.
Todays wind plants are quite capable of providing the
full range of ancillary services that conventional thermal and
hydro plants offer, often with greater speed and accuracy. To
demonstrate the capability of todays technology, this article
describes several examples of wind plants that use GE wind
technology. Other large mainstream wind equipment manufacturers provide functional capabilities similar to those
described here, although implemented using different strategies and methods.
Power
2% Frequency
Increase
(1.2 Hz f)
50% Power
Reduction
Frequency
10 s/div
10 s/div
Frequency
10%
Power
Increase
4% Frequency
Reduction
(2.4 Hz f )
Power
15
10
Power (MW)
Wind Speed
90
10
0
11
0
12
0
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
20
10
Power MW
7E
-0
8
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Time (min)
wind resource to produce rated output of 30 MW throughout the two-hour period, so, of course, the final output is a
steady 30 MW. It is of interest to note that the scheduled
limit is held tightly; the power variations around the limit
are barely visible in the plots, even though the wind speed is
moderately variable. The figure also shows the power ramp
limiter maintaining a specified rate of change in power output between each successive step. In this case, the plant is
not allowed to increase its power output at a rate faster than
5% per minute. However, a wide range of ramping speed
(both faster and slower) may be set in the controls if needed.
This ability to tightly hold and ramp the output enables
wind generation to provide the same benefits to the grid as
any other conventional technology, and because the speed
of ramping may be set faster or slower for wind plants, it is
arguably more flexible than what conventional units provide.
A unique limiting technique is used to maximize energy
capture of the plant while at the same time enforcing an overall power ramp limit for the system. The ramp limiter does
not impose a rate of change on any single power-producing
turbine until the plant power rate of change approaches the
limit. This technique allows each turbine to respond to local
changes in wind conditions and each turbine to ramp its
power independently of the other turbines. Only when the
entire response of the collective plant approaches the ramp
limit will the control enforce a ramp limit for the plant.
respond to significant under-frequency events as a speed governor would on a conventional unit. The command for this
response emanates from the wind plant level and is delivered
to each individual WTG. In order to increase active power,
the plant must be partially curtailed so that additional power
can be extracted from the available wind. This incremental
power order signal will add to that from WindINERTIA,
which is local to the individual WTG. The total response of
the WTG to these two signals is coordinated to respect the
physical capabilities of the WTG. Other wind manufacturers
provide similar functionality.
1,800
1,500
Power (kW)
1,200
900
600
8 m/s Avg Meas
14 m/s Avg Meas
300
0
10
20
30
40 50
Time (s)
60
70
80
Wind Speed
Voltage at POI
(a)
Wind Speed
Wind Plant Power Output
(b)
figure 5. A demonstration of voltage regulation performance during variable power output conditions: (a) the wind plant voltage and the voltage at the point of interconnection with the grid; (b) the wind plant power output for the same wind speed.
28
november/december 2015
Reactive
Power
Active
Power
(Zero)
0
75
Time (s)
100
Conclusion
Commercially available wind power plants today are
capable of meeting the full range of grid requirements and
already provide performance similar to that ofand, in
30
some cases, superior toconventional generating equipment. The technology has evolved because of the growing
demand for advanced functionality in active and reactive
power control to maintain the integrity of the bulk system,
and it has been proven to work well in many operating wind
plants supplied by various manufacturers throughout the
world today. This opens the possibility for wind plants to
provide ancillary services to the power system. Wind plants
are available today with the full range of these services.
Mechanisms to enable the value of these functions and features through interconnection requirements, grid codes, and
market incentives continue to evolve as a necessary means
to maintain power system integrity, reliability, and economical operation.
Biographies:
Jason MacDowell is with GE Energy Consulting, Schenectady, New York.
Sudipta Dutta is with GE Energy Consulting, Schenectady, New York.
Matt Richwine is with GE Energy Consulting, Schenectady, New York.
Sebastian Achilles is with GE Energy Consulting, Schenectady, New York.
Nicholas Miller is with GE Energy Consulting, Schenectady, New York.
p&e
november/december 2015