Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Update
First Quarter 2016
Authors:
Chip Johnston
Jennifer McPherson
Janel Young
Erin Dand
Haifeng Hu
Rhonda Ferguson
stikeman.com
Introduction
Thank you for taking the time to review this update.
Weve compiled a summary of activity in the energy
market and an overview of key legal developments in
both the public and private markets from January 1
to March 31, 2016 that may be of particular interest.
About Stikeman Elliott
Stikeman Elliott is one of Canadas leading business law firms,
recognized for top tier services in each of our core practice
areas M&A, corporate finance, real estate, corporatecommercial law, banking, structured finance, tax, insolvency,
competition and foreign investment, and employment and
business litigation. We have prominent cross-border expertise,
as the first Canadian firm to open offices in London and New
York, and extensive experience in the U.S., Europe, China, and
South and Southeast Asia, as well as in Latin America, the
Caribbean and Africa.
Calgary Office
Our Calgary office is home to many of Albertas leading lawyers.
Opened in 1992, the office maintains a business law practice
focused on M&A, securities, banking, joint ventures, project
financings, real estate, tax and employment. In addition, our
Calgary office maintains a busy commercial litigation practice
recognized for its work on leading oil and gas cases, as well as a
renowned regulatory practice involving oil and gas and
electricity related matters.
Our Calgary lawyers have expertise in a variety of sectors, with a
focus on the oil and gas industry. We have acted as trusted
advisors on many of the energy sectors most complex
undertakings, from the financing and development of major
projects to ongoing operations. Businesses turn to us for expert
counsel relating to the exploration, production and refining of
conventional oil and gas, oil sands and shale gas, as well as the
extraction, transportation, processing and storage of crude oil,
bitumen, natural gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG) on a
worldwide basis. We also have extensive experience with respect
to energy trading and energy derivative products.
The office has a significant international dimension, advising on
foreign investment in the Canadian energy sector, cross-border
trade in energy resources and participation in international
energy projects.
Date
Transaction
E&P Acquisitions
Public Targets
$4.595B
March 21
$100M
January 13
$90M
March 24
$80M
January 18
$30M
February 2
$10M
March 24
$5M
January 27
February 2
$185M
February 3
$30M
February 29
$30M
March 31
$15M
March 24
Value
(CAD)
Date
Transaction
January 22
$5M
March 15
Midstream Acquisitions
Private Targets & Assets
$95M
February 29
January 4
E&P Finance
Prospectus Offerings of Equity
$110M
March 9
$100M
March 8
$95M
March 15
$95M
March 16
$45M
March 18
$35M
March 24
February 24
Value
(CAD)
Date
Transaction
January 14
$10M
February 16
$5M
January 5
March 1
February 29
Midstream Finance
Prospectus Offerings of Equity
$2.3B
March 1
$345M
March 29
$170M
January 15
$80M
March 22
January 22
$565M
January 22
Value
(CAD)
Date
Transaction
March 22
$65M
March 29
March 31
$20M
March 14
Recapitalizations
$25M
January 18
$10M
February 12
February 17
$290M
March 3
$110M
March 21
Terms of reference
This survey reports all closed oil & gas industry transactions valued at $5M or greater involving
businesses listed on a Canadian exchange or headquartered in Canada. All values are rounded to the
nearest $5M and are stated in Canadian dollars. Transactions values are reported on a net basis as of the
closing date (not announcement), and therefore include assumed debt and other payments, but do not
include assumed net working capital, when such details are available.
We have relied only on press releases and various data services in compiling this list. We have not
attempted to identify transactions which are disclosed indirectly or are otherwise not disclosed. We have
used our discretion in determining how a transaction is described and whether a transaction was
announced in the quarter or constitutes an oil and gas transaction.
Undisclosed transactions involving the purchase or sale of assets of private entities, or entities listed
outside of Canada are not included.
A target is public if it is listed, is a reporting issuer or is sufficiently widely-held to justify the use of an
arrangement or non-exempt bid to complete the acquisition. In certain cases we have identified the
notable features of an M&A transaction. We identify all unsolicited transactions.
A placement is to a sponsor if the issuer has placed a substantial number of securities to a single
purchaser or small group of purchasers. Sponsor investments, where known, are expressed on a diluted
basis.
Values listed in the CCAA and Bankruptcy Proceedings category reflect the total assets of the company
listed in the most recently filed interim or annual financial statement.
Values listed in the Activism category reflect the market capitalization of the company, calculated by
using the number of shares outstanding as of the most recently filed interim or annual financial
statement, multiplied by the opening share price of the company on the event date.
We have used our discretion in identifying a transaction as a Recapitalization and have described only
the material features of the transaction.
Corporate names have been truncated and parent entities are used in place of subsidiaries, as applicable.
Only the lead dealers in financings are identified. We have used our discretion in this regard if the
transaction press release does not disclose this information. If no agent or underwriter was disclosed, we
assumed the financing was non-brokered.
Capital Markets
Albertas Finance Minister appointed a new ASC Chair and Chief Executive Officer and re-affirmed that
Alberta will not support the creation of a national securities regulator.
British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and New Brunswick adopted a new prospectus
exemption permitting listed issuers to, subject to satisfying certain disclosure requirements, distribute
securities to investors who have obtained advice about the suitability of the investment from a registered
investment dealer. This exemption does not restrict the size of offerings or the size of an investors
investment.
The CSA released its 2015 Enforcement Report showing an increase over 2014 in proceedings
commenced, ongoing matters concluded and the quantum of monetary sanctions imposed.
In light of the changes to the prospectus exempt rights offering regime, the TSX and the TSXV issued
interim guidance confirming that materials must be pre-cleared with the relevant exchange and five
trading days advance notice of the record date must be provided.
The TSX issued a staff notice answering frequently asked questions regarding normal course issuer bids
by listed issuers and publishing previously undisclosed TSX administrative practices regarding normal
course issuer bids.
Continuous Disclosure
The CSA released final amendments to the early warning requirements. Effective May 9, 2016, reporting of
2% decreases in ownership and exit reporting upon ownership falling below the 10% reporting threshold
will be mandatory.
The ASC published its 2015 Oil and Gas Review Report summarizing, among other things, deficiencies in
disclosure under NI 51-101. Key areas for improvement were disclosure of resources other than reserves,
type wells (type curves) and drilling locations, well test data and reserves reconciliations. The report also
provided guidance on disclosure of abandonment and reclamation costs.
The CSA released revised guidelines regarding disclosure of non-GAAP measures, in particular relating to
the inclusion of additional subtotals from an issuers financial statements in a press release or outside of
financial statements.
The OSC published the results of its review of insider reporting and insider trading policies urging
reporting insiders to improve the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of their insider reporting. The
OSC also provided recommendations for improving issuers insider trading policies.
Corporate Governance
The Institute of Corporate Directors released guidance encouraging corporate boards to play a more
meaningful role in shareholder engagement.
Litigation
The ASC released reasons for its decision in Re Perpetual Energy Inc. to decline to cease trade a rights
offering that was dilutive to the value debentureholders would receive when their convertible debentures
were repaid with shares at maturity. The ASC found that Perpetual had a genuine and legitimate business
purpose for the rights offering and that while it may be unfair to certain debentureholders, the applicants
failed to prove that it was abusive to debentureholders or harmful to the capital markets. The ASC also
found that a cease trade order was not an appropriate remedy as it could harm shareholders while
granting a windfall to debentureholders that, like one of the applicants, purchased convertible debentures
after announcement of the rights offering.
In Beaudette v Alberta, the Alberta Court of Appeal upheld the ability of the ASC to compel witnesses to
appear, give testimony and produce documents, and to share information with law enforcement agencies
and other government or regulatory authorities in Canada or elsewhere.
Litigation
The federal government has already imposed conditions on Enbridges Northern Gateway pipeline project,
but provincial conditions may also be forthcoming as a result of a B.C. courts ruling that the province
must fulfil its own duty to consult with affected First Nations and make its own decision.
Tax
The federal budget proposes to introduce a specific regime that will treat emissions allowances as
inventory, which will apply to emissions allowances acquired in taxation years beginning after 2016.
Although the Liberal government had previously promised to change the tax treatment of stock options,
the 2016 budget is silent on this issue, meaning there will be no changes to taxation of stock options in
the upcoming year.
Employment
In Keenan v Canac Kitchens Ltd., the Ontario Court of Appeal found that two contractors that worked
exclusively for one company were dependent contractors entitled to notice periods akin to those that
similarly situated employees would receive, even though the company had labelled these individuals as
independent contractors.
Competition
In US Steel Canada Inc. (Re), the Ontario Court of Appeal held that the confidentiality provisions set out in
the Investment Canada Act (ICA) do not prevent courts from ordering companies to disclose the
undertakings they are required to make to the Canadian government in order to obtain ICA approval for
foreign acquisitions.
Related Publications
Canadian Public Markets Law
10