You are on page 1of 2

District- Tinsukia, ASSAM

I N T H E GAU H AT I H I G H CO U RT

(The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal


Pradesh)
(CRIMINAL-ORIGINAL-JURISDICTION)

Criminal Petition No.

of 2015

Sri Sandeep Sureka


......Petitioner
-VSThe State of Assam and another
.....Respondents
LIST OF DATE

DATE/

PARTICULARS

YEAR
27/08/2005
2/11/2009

FIR Filed
Charge Sheet was filed against the Tinsukia P.S.

04/11/2009

Case No.433/2005
Cognizance was taken on the Charge sheet and

04/12/2009

process was issued against the accused person.


The Ld.CJM TInsukia Withdraw the case to his own
file and again issued process under section 204

15/12/2009

Cr.P.C.
1st revision petition filed by the accused Narendra

26/03/2014

Kr Dalmia being No. 67(4)2009.


Judgment passed by the Additional Sessions Judge
(FTC)No.2,Tinsukia in criminal revision Petition

08/04/2014

08/01/2015

02/02/2015

being No. 67(4)2009.


The accused Narendra K Dalmia preferred a Crl
Petition before the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court
challenging the same subject as challenged in the
aforesaid revision being Crl. Petition No.243 of
2014
Judgment passed by the Hon'ble Gauhati High
court criminal Petition being No. 243/2014.

The ld. SDJM (S) Tinsukia issued summons against


all the accused person.

03/03/2015

Another Criminal Revision Petition was filed by


another accused namely, Vikash Agarwalla before
the Ld. Session Judge, Tinsukia challenging the
same thing which has already been decided by the

30/05/2015

Hon'ble Gauhati High Court.


The Learned Session Judge arbitrarily and illegally
transferred the said Crl. Revision (Being No.15(1)
of 2015) by passing an ex-parte order from the
Court

of

FTC

No.1

to

FTC

No.2

even

after

completion of hearing from the Respondent side


since the revisoinist was absent on that day and
did not turn out after repeated call.
Filed by

Ashim Chamuah
Advocate

You might also like