Professional Documents
Culture Documents
University of Colorado
Fall 2016
Prof. Brooks
Instructions
Do not write a summary of the texts. Focus on analysis instead of summary, and assume your
audience (me) has read the books you are discussing.
Citation Instructions:
Douglass (D, 3)
Shakespeare (S, 65)
Hemingway (H, 20)
Aristotle (A, 34)
Courser Reader (CR, 21) [The Bible, The Republic, etc.]
Stockdale (St, 44)
Dostoevsky (Do, 23)
Aristophanes (Ao, 32)
Platos Apology (Pl, 24)
Epictetus (E, 39)
McCarthy (M, 49)
When you use quotations, please cite the page numbers as follows:
Justice is the advantage of the stronger (CR, 44).
Use twelve point Times New Roman font, double-spaced paragraphs, and 1 inch margins. Please staple the pages
together and number them. See the appendix of the course reader for additional writing guidelines and instructions.
Under no circumstances should you consult secondary literature (articles, essays, books, websites, etc.); the purpose
of this assignment is to prompt you to think independently about the text, not to summarize someone elses thoughts
about it. Failure to abide by this stipulation constitutes a violation of academic integrity and will be treated
accordingly. You are free to make use of your notes from class.
Grading
Note: Consult the course reader appendix for additional writing advice and a guide to my grading standards.
This is an exercise in formal writing. You should therefore not use contractions (cant, wont, shouldnt) or the first
person (I feel that) or slang or colloquial expressions (Aristotle is, like, totally awesome). Aim for clear,
unpretentious prose that sets forth your thesis concisely and correctly. Your essay must have a thesisa point it will
set out to provethat is stated clearly in the first paragraph. If by the end of the first paragraph the reader doesnt
know what point you are setting out to prove, things are off to a bad start. It may help to imagine that you are a
lawyer, arguing your answer to the prompt before a judge or jury. Your essay will be assessed in accordance with the
following three criteria, with each criterion receiving approximately equal weight:
-The cogency and coherence of your argument
-Your skill in interpreting the relevant text(s)
-The quality of your writing (grammar, style, structure, spelling, word usage, concision, clarity)