Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FORUMS
IDEAS
Autodesk Community
CFD
Forum
CFD Forum
Welcome to Autodesks CFD Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular CFD topics.
REPLY
Message Listing
Topic Options
Previous Topic
Next Topic
hs.simanto
Options
83 Posts
12 Kudos
3 Solutions
4 Ideas
Post 1 of 5
As we know Prior to running an analysis, the geometry is broken up into small pieces called elements. The corner of
each element is a node. The calculation is performed at the nodes. These elements and nodes make up the mesh.
I have found on several cases that node number is less than element number...
Is it possible that in any case node numbers will be less than of element numbers??
Thanks!
Report
Related Content
Simanto
C.pdf 678 KB
Kudo | 2 Kudos
As your example points out, models with lower element counts tend to not support our rule of thumb of 5 elements
per node. The ve to one ratio is more appropriate for meshes containing million of elements. In your coarse
model, if mesh enhancement is turned on, the you are generating a fair number of 6 node wedge elements, which
results in a lower element to node ratio. So, I amend my earilier statement -The node to element ratio is a function
of element types employed and the surface area to volume ratio of the geometry meshed. Tetrahedral elements
usually lead to a 5 to 1 element to node ratio. Hexahedral elements have a more equal element to node count. If
mesh enhancement is enabled, 6-node wedge elements will populate the boundary layer of your uid region.
Wedge element also will lower your element to node ratio.
Over the years we have developed a mesh count estimator. This is used to populate the "Approximate element
count:" item on the screen you showed. But, this estimate is very approximate. Years ago, I plotted Actual
elementsversus Estimated element in a x-y plot for many models. As you might expect that was a fair amount of
scatter away from the slope = 1 line.
To answer to your question, "Is it possible to nd the exact number of nodes of those approximate element count
apart from any ratio?". The answer is no. Nodal estimate would probably have the same error bounds as the
element estimator. Improvements in node count estimation could be had, if one could estimate the types of
element being used everywhere in the model. This can be done to some degree of accuracy in the boundary layer
meshing zones, but in general, this is dicult to do.
Dave.
Everyone's Tags: elements nodes
Alternative Meshing S
Transferring Results to
Meshing
Windows 10 Suppor
Software Downloads
Network License Ad
Kudo
REPLY
Subscription Mana
35 Posts
8 Kudos
7 Solutions
Post 2 of 5
Report
Options
Subscription Help
Maintenance Plan H
The node to element ratio is a function of element types employed and the surface area to volume ratio of the
geometry meshed. Tetrahedral elements usually lead to a 5 to 1 element to node ratio. Hexahedral elements have a
more equal element to node count.
Dave.
Quick Links
Create Account
Sign In
Kudo
hs.simanto
REPLY
Options
Post 3 of 5
Report
From these results, how can i get approximate node count if the "1365 total node" is representing " 5 to 1 element to
node ratio " ?
Is it possible to nd the exact number of nodes of those approximate element count apart from any ratio?
Thanks :)
Simanto
Everyone's Tags: elements nodes
Kudo
waited
REPLY
Options
35 Posts
8 Kudos
7 Solutions
Post 4 of 5
Report
As your example points out, models with lower element counts tend to not support our rule of thumb of 5 elements
per node. The ve to one ratio is more appropriate for meshes containing million of elements. In your coarse model, if
mesh enhancement is turned on, the you are generating a fair number of 6 node wedge elements, which results in a
lower element to node ratio. So, I amend my earilier statement -The node to element ratio is a function of element
types employed and the surface area to volume ratio of the geometry meshed. Tetrahedral elements usually lead to a 5
to 1 element to node ratio. Hexahedral elements have a more equal element to node count. If mesh enhancement is
enabled, 6-node wedge elements will populate the boundary layer of your uid region. Wedge element also will lower
your element to node ratio.
Over the years we have developed a mesh count estimator. This is used to populate the "Approximate element count:"
item on the screen you showed. But, this estimate is very approximate. Years ago, I plotted Actual elementsversus
Estimated element in a x-y plot for many models. As you might expect that was a fair amount of scatter away from the
slope = 1 line.
To answer to your question, "Is it possible to nd the exact number of nodes of those approximate element count apart
from any ratio?". The answer is no. Nodal estimate would probably have the same error bounds as the element
estimator. Improvements in node count estimation could be had, if one could estimate the types of element being used
everywhere in the model. This can be done to some degree of accuracy in the boundary layer meshing zones, but in
general, this is dicult to do.
Dave.
Kudo | 2 Kudos
hs.simanto
REPLY
Options
Post 5 of 5
Report
Kudo
FOLLOWAUTODESK
YES
Message Listing
NO
Previous Topic
REPLY
Next Topic
PRODUCTS
SUPPORT&LEARNING
BUY
AUTODESK
Freeproducttrials
Productsupport
Subscriptionoptions
3DCADsoftware
AutodeskStore
Autodeskisaleaderin3Ddesign,en
entertainmentsoftware.
3Dprinting
Installation,registration&
licensing
Findareseller
Aboutus
Supportofferings
Careers
Allsocialmedia
Civilengineering
Construction
Drafting
Manufacturing
Sketching&painting
Classesondemand
Events
Updates&servicepacks
Systemrequirements
Helpforums
Studentdownloads
Findbyindustry
Privacy/Cookies(Updated)|LegalNotices&Trademarks|ReportNoncompliance|Sitemap|2016AutodeskInc.Allrightsreserved
Contactus
Investorrelations
Trustcenter
Newsroom