Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction:
It is a statistical technique used to explore data for patterns, confirm theoretical
hypotheses or to reduce a large number of variables to a smaller manageable
number. It explains the variability amongst observed, correlated variables in
terms of a smaller number of unobserved variables called factors.
Flowchart:
Add all the variables to be used for data reduction, taking care not to include
dummy variables such as Subject Number or Serial Number for example.
Choose Descriptives, a new window as shown below, will appear. Check the
options as shown in the window and click Continue.
Options
Univariate descriptives
Initial solution
Coefficient
Significance levels
Determinant
KMO and Bartletts
Inverse
Reproduced
Anti-image
Descriptions
Mean and standard deviation
Communalities estimate for the factors
R-matrix
Significance value matrix for the R-matrix
Test for multicollinearity or singularity
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy
and Bartletts test
Provides inverse of the correlation matrix
Correlation matrix for the model
Anti-image matrix of covariance and correlation
Option
Description
Correlation
recommended for variables that are not meaningfully
Matrix
comparable
Covariance
Matrix
for variables that are similar
Principal Axis
Factors are successively extracted till there is a large enough
Factoring
variance accounted for in Correlation Matrix
Principal
Component
Extracts maximum variance from data set with each component
Analysis
thus reducing large number of variables into smaller components
(A Beginners Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis,
An Gie Yong and Sean Pearce, 2013)
Now choose Rotation, a new window as shown below, will appear. Check the
options as shown in the window and click Continue.
Option
Description
Orthogonal Rotation; Minimization of number of variables that have
high loadings on each factor and makes smaller loadings even
Varimax
smaller
Orthogonal Rotation; Minimization of number of factors needed to
Quartimax
explain each variable
Direct
Oblique Rotation; Simplification of structure and mathematics of the
Oblimin
output
Promax
Oblique Rotation; Raising loadings to a power of 4
(A Beginners Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis,
An Gie Yong and Sean Pearce, 2013)
Click OK in the Factor Analysis window.
The observed Correlation Matrix is as follows:
Correlation Matrixa
crime
Correlation
pa_manip
sex_def
sex_subj
sentence
serious
crime
1.000
-.003
.010
.010
.074
.146
pa_manip
-.003
1.000
.003
.003
-.135
-.103
sex_def
.010
.003
1.000
.003
.058
-.066
sex_subj
.010
.003
.003
1.000
-.160
.001
sentence
.074
-.135
.058
-.160
1.000
.551
serious
.146
-.103
-.066
.001
.551
1.000
exciting
-.145
.489
-.085
-.002
.028
.099
calm
-.069
.149
.015
.057
-.028
.085
independ
.058
.194
-.109
.047
.042
.033
sincere
.063
.072
.013
.148
-.007
.007
-.006
.064
.066
.018
-.077
-.162
phy_attr
.000
.901
-.047
-.038
-.147
-.114
kind
.093
.099
.074
.018
-.105
-.151
intellig
-.395
.350
.136
.025
-.035
.009
strong
-.133
.405
-.043
.046
-.047
.076
sophist
-.234
.445
.055
.054
-.066
.059
happy
-.167
.266
.047
-.013
.029
.002
sociable
-.352
.294
-.070
.047
-.011
.058
warm
Correlation Matrixa
exciting
Correlation
crime
calm
independ
sincere
warm
phy_attr
-.145
-.069
.058
.063
-.006
.000
.489
.149
.194
.072
.064
.901
sex_def
-.085
.015
-.109
.013
.066
-.047
sex_subj
-.002
.057
.047
.148
.018
-.038
sentence
.028
-.028
.042
-.007
-.077
-.147
serious
.099
.085
.033
.007
-.162
-.114
exciting
1.000
.166
.240
.014
.035
.507
calm
.166
1.000
.294
.077
.070
.092
independ
.240
.294
1.000
.220
.151
.202
sincere
.014
.077
.220
1.000
.536
.133
warm
.035
.070
.151
.536
1.000
.114
phy_attr
.507
.092
.202
.133
.114
1.000
kind
.051
.078
.118
.389
.538
.182
pa_manip
intellig
.370
.260
.167
.091
.142
.356
strong
.424
.303
.309
.188
.213
.391
sophist
.380
.326
.184
.088
.084
.419
happy
.396
.213
.155
.136
.246
.285
sociable
.443
.247
.118
.015
.013
.279
Correlation Matrixa
kind
intellig
strong
sophist
happy
sociable
crime
.093
-.395
-.133
-.234
-.167
-.352
pa_manip
.099
.350
.405
.445
.266
.294
sex_def
.074
.136
-.043
.055
.047
-.070
sex_subj
.018
.025
.046
.054
-.013
.047
sentence
-.105
-.035
-.047
-.066
.029
-.011
serious
-.151
.009
.076
.059
.002
.058
exciting
.051
.370
.424
.380
.396
.443
calm
.078
.260
.303
.326
.213
.247
independ
.118
.167
.309
.184
.155
.118
sincere
.389
.091
.188
.088
.136
.015
warm
.538
.142
.213
.084
.246
.013
phy_attr
.182
.356
.391
.419
.285
.279
1.000
.148
.267
.134
.251
.020
intellig
.148
1.000
.510
.531
.409
.343
strong
.267
.510
1.000
.568
.353
.349
sophist
.134
.531
.568
1.000
.413
.418
happy
.251
.409
.353
.413
1.000
.377
sociable
.020
.343
.349
.418
.377
1.000
Correlation
kind
a.
Determinant = .002
Variables having a great number of small correlation coefficient (r < +/- .30)
should be removed as they indicate a lack of patterned relationships.
Furthermore, correlations that are above r = +/- .90 show that your data may
have a problem of multicollinearity. As a follow-up, check if the Determinant
score is above the rule of thumb of .00001 as this indicates an absence of
multicollinearity. If your data have an issue of multicollinearity, you will need to
determine the item that is causing the problem and remove it from the analysis.
(A Beginners Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis,
An Gie Yong and Sean Pearce, 2013)
phy_attr
.757
-.040
-.434
.428
-.141
-.028
pa_manip
.728
-.111
-.402
.359
-.072
.064
sophist
.698
-.144
.092
-.156
.062
.205
strong
.692
.011
.172
-.040
.172
.101
intellig
.657
-.099
.133
-.289
-.156
.211
exciting
.623
-.242
.009
.090
.015
-.226
happy
.547
.027
.180
-.111
-.109
-.071
sociable
.535
-.255
.092
-.231
.018
-.271
calm
.351
-.041
.189
-.103
.289
.113
independ
.336
.082
.155
.135
.316
-.044
warm
.298
.744
.235
.011
-.160
-.131
kind
.301
.568
.130
.050
-.068
.033
sincere
.239
.521
.236
.128
.056
-.059
sentence
-.116
-.323
.634
.379
-.286
-.016
serious
-.033
-.358
.527
.304
.075
.026
crime
-.242
.179
-.016
.542
.217
.155
sex_subj
.044
.088
-.006
-.075
.200
.029
sex_def
.002
.080
.045
-.072
-.241
.317
STEP 4: Repeat STEP 3 until all factors that are needed to account for the
correlations in the correlation matrix have been extracted. The table which
results after the extraction process is complete, the values are arranged in a
table called matrix of un rotated loadings
STEP 5: Rotate factors.
Factor matrix from STEP 4 is rotated to a mathematically equivalent matrix which
represents factor constructs that are much more useful for scientific purposes
than the original un-rotated factor constructs. The un-rotated matrix from STEP 4
tends to contain highly complex factor constructs that relate to or overlap with
many of the variables than just a few of them, hence rotation is required.
phy_attr
.962
.125
.124
-.096
.022
-.030
pa_manip
.895
.133
.029
-.089
.113
.025
exciting
.486
.423
.022
.134
.167
-.213
crime
.096
-.638
.094
.149
.077
-.050
sociable
.211
.608
-.023
.047
.171
-.200
intellig
.265
.592
.093
.012
.274
.328
sophist
.362
.473
.039
.027
.437
.196
happy
.230
.460
.253
.080
.160
.041
warm
.001
.088
.850
-.088
.005
.046
kind
.095
.018
.628
-.096
.108
.119
sincere
.035
-.040
.613
.022
.168
-.031
sentence
-.064
.006
-.002
.844
-.160
.059
serious
-.045
-.030
-.117
.679
.156
-.063
strong
.342
.368
.213
.066
.495
.054
calm
.065
.197
.049
.055
.468
.005
independ
.171
.034
.194
.093
.394
-.175
sex_subj
-.049
-.020
.039
-.110
.194
-.045
sex_def
-.022
.013
.056
.006
-.057
.406
Initial Eigenvalues
Total
% of Variance
Cumulative %
Total
% of Variance
Cumulative %
4.418
24.542
24.542
4.023
22.348
22.348
2.051
11.396
35.938
1.604
8.910
31.258
1.673
9.294
45.231
1.316
7.310
38.568
1.456
8.091
53.322
1.083
6.016
44.584
1.198
6.656
59.978
.544
3.023
47.607
1.041
5.781
65.759
.394
2.190
49.798
.955
5.308
71.067
.755
4.195
75.262
.730
4.057
79.319
10
.649
3.603
82.922
11
.545
3.030
85.952
12
.510
2.833
88.785
13
.477
2.647
91.432
14
.400
2.222
93.654
15
.373
2.075
95.728
16
.358
1.991
97.719
17
.323
1.796
99.515
18
.087
.485
100.000
Total Variance Explained
Factor
% of Variance
Cumulative %
2.441
13.560
13.560
1.961
10.894
24.454
1.697
9.426
33.880
1.285
7.140
41.020
1.118
6.211
47.231
.462
2.567
49.798
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Introduction:
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy tells us whether the recorded
data or responses is suitable for Factor Analysis.
Established Scales:
Value
0.90 KMO 1.00
0.80 KMO 0.89
0.70 KMO 0.79
0.60 KMO 0.69
Remarks
Marvellous degree of Common
Variance
Meritorious degree of Common
Variance
Middling degree of Common
Variance
Mediocre degree of Common
Variance
Citation
Kaiser, 1974
Example:
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.
.753
Approx. Chi-Square
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity
1915.217
df
153
Sig.
.000
Established Scales:
Value
Remark
.9
.7 < .9
Citation
Flynn, Schroeder & Sakakibara,
1994
George & Mallery, 2003
.6 < .7
.5 < .6
< .5