Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TANAS DANIELA
,,Humanitarian Intervention as a Peaceful Instrument
ESSAY
CHIINU, 2016
for the intervention, namely, to save foreigners from the ills inflicted upon them by their rulers or
by powerful, protected groups in their own country. But since motives are always complex, this
motive need only be dominant, not exclusive. Intervention is then defined in terms that involve
the action being against the consent of the target state.
To be legal, forcible military intervention in a humanitarian crisis must be authorized by a
resolution of the Security Council. However, UNSC resolutions can be vetoed by any one of the
permanent five members (P5) which are USA, Russia, China, Britain and France. The last decade
of the twentieth century saw an unprecedented increase in the number and scale of military
interventions by United Nations forces: this has been called the new interventionism. Between
1998 and 1993 alone, 20 new peacekeeping missions were established. At the same time, the size
of the annual UN peacekeeping budget shot up from US$230 million in 1988, to between US$800
million and US$1.6 billion throughout the 1990s. Behind this increased activity was the end of the
cold war, which produced the demand, opportunities, and incentives for UN-sponsored
humanitarian intervention. A series of regional peace agreements in Afghanistan, Angola, Namibia,
Central America, and Cambodia accompanied the winding down of the cold war, and these
demanded peacekeeping forces to supervise ceasefires, military demobilization, and elections. The
opportunities to respond to this demand existed with increased great power cooperation in the
UNSC and with the freeing up of surplus cold war military capability for peacekeeping duties.
Incentives for humanitarian intervention have come from public pressure on governments to do
something about large-scale civilian suffering in failed and murderous states.
One of the most important intervention of the Humanitarian groups were in Somalia. Somalia
became one of the first states in which the Security Council got their hands dirty. In 1991, when
Somalias long-time dictator, Said Barre, was overthrown in a coup, there was a power struggle
among the various warlords fighting for control of the government. Moreover, a severe drought
threatened mass starvation. With fighting in the Mogadishu capital and extremely difficult
conditions for delivering food, the Security Council declared Somalias deteriorating humanitarian
situation a threat to international peace and security.
However, since the P5 nationsthe United States, France, Britain, China, and Russiawere
reluctant to authorize UN intervention, fearing they would violate the states sovereignty, the UN
slowly responded in helping agencies stop the crisis. After repeated requests from aid agencies, the
Security Council imposed an embargo on all deliveries of weapons and military equipment to
Somalia. But as the humanitarian situation worsened, the Security Council was forced to take
more drastic action. After that the UN launchedan operation in Somalia, called ONSOM I, in
which, with 500 peacekeepers, the Security Council the operation to monitor the ceasefire in the
capital, to provide security to aid convoys, and to guard the food depots.
Another important intervention was in Rwanda when after the death of the President the
political situation took a bad turn. Blaming the RPF (patriotic party) for the deaths of the two
presidents, the Hutu extremists initiated a search and kill mission for members of President
Habyarimans government and in one hundred days, Hutu extremists massacred over 800,000
people. The UN initiated another operation called UNAMIR and sent 5,000 lightly armed
peacekeepers, which were unprepared to confront the extremists wave of terror. Hutu extremists
kidnapped Belgian peacekeepers and executed them. With the gross and systematic killings, the
Hutu extremists quickly forced Belgium to withdraw its unprepared troops from UNAMIR. Since
no state wanted to send their troops to an increasing chaotic environment, the Security Council had
a hard time convincing member states to contribute their troops for an expanded operation. As a
result, when it called upon all concerned to end the violence and to respect fully international
humanitarian law, the Security Council decided to keep the situation in Rwanda under constant
review.
The NATO bombing of Yugoslavia was the North Atlantic Treaty Organisations (NATO)
military operation against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) during the Kosovo War. The
air strikes lasted from March 24, 1999 to June 10, 1999. The bombings continued until an
agreement was reached that led to the withdrawal of Yugoslav armed forces from Kosovo and the
establishment of United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo(UNMIK), a
UN peacekeeping mission in Kosovo.NATO claimed that the Albanian population in Kosovo were
being persecuted by FRY forces, Serbian police, and Serb paramilitary forces, and that military
action was needed to force the FRY to stop. NATO countries attempted to gain authorization from
the United
Nations
Security
Council for
military
action,
but
were
opposed
by China and Russia that indicated they would veto such a proposal. NATO launched a campaign
without UN authorization, which it described as a humanitarian intervention. The FRY described
the NATO campaign as an illegal war of aggression against a sovereign country that was in
violation of international law because it did not have UN Security Council support.
The bombing killed between 489 and 528 civilians, and destroyed bridges, industrial plants, public
buildings, private businesses, as well as barracks and military installations.