Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hh(s)
k
km
knom
k\
k2
N(.y)
s
[Y]
[Z]
Z;(s)
ZL(s)
ioc
wm
=
=
=
=
=
positive constants
chain matrix (au, al2, a2l, a22)
denominator polynomial in s
impedance-conversion function of g.i.c.
voltage gain of a voltage-controlled voltage
source
= differential gain of an operational amplifier
at d.c.
= differential gains of operational amplifiers
current gain of a current-controlled current
source
= positive real functions
gyration constant
= measured gyration constant
= nominal gyration constant
= conversion factor of negative-impedance
convertor
= inversion factor of negative-impedance invertor
= numerator polynomial in s
= complex frequency variable ( = a + jut)
= Fmatrix
= Zmatrix
= input impedance
= load impedance
= dominant pole of amplifier gain
= maximum frequency at which the dominantpole approximation for the amplifier gain
is valid
Introduction
Realisation of negative-impedance
convertors and invertors
The realisation of n.i.c.s and negative-impedance invertors (n.i.i.s) is now considered, as they will be used in the
realisation of gyrators. An n.i.i. is an active 2-port network
which has an input impedance of k2\ZL when terminated
byZL.(*2>0).
There are two types of n.i.c, the voltage-inversion type
(v.n.i.c.) which has-a chain matrix as follows:
'2
h
where [A]lJuhc.
(1)
R2.
0
.1;
0
k
(2)
-T
(/?,/'/?2) = i
PROC. IEE, Vol. 116, No. II, NOVEMBER 1969
R2
(3)
_1
where
32
RiR2 = k2.
(8)
We wish to represent the v.c.v.s. by two I-ports, as shown in
Vi
6
= i= O
v,i arbitrary
Fig. 1
zA
ZH
c.n.i.c.
v.n.i.c.
7?,
00
n.i.i
Ri
Type of circuit
Zc
Zi,
RI
00
00
R\
CO
00
oo
Ri
Ri
'Singular elements
In this Section, an equivalence relating the singular
elements to controlled sources is proved. This will be used in
the derivation of n.i.c.s, n.i.i.s and gyrators using operational
amplifiers.
The singular elements described by Carlin and Yoiila17 are
the nullator and norator. The nullator shown in Fig. 2a, js a
I-port which will neither sustain a voltage nor pass a current
(i.e. V = / = 0). On the other hand, the norator in Fig. 26,
is a 1-port which will sustain an arbitrary voltage and pass an
arbitrary current which are independent of each other. A
2-port consisting of a nullator as port 1 and a norator as port
2, as shown in Fig. 2c, has been defined as a nullor.18
Martinelli19 has shown that an ideal transistor is equivalent
to a nullor. Butler20 and Davies21 have also demonstrated,
without a general proof, that an infinite-gain voltage-controlled voltage source (v.c.v.s.) is also equivalent to a nullor. A
proof of this equivalence is now provided! In addition, the
three remaining types of infinite-gain controlled source are
shown to be equivalent to nullors.
Consider a v.c.v.s. embedded in a general 3-port network N,
as shown in Fig. 2d. It is assumed that A^has a finite ^matrix
V]=inr)
Singular elements
a Nullator
b Norator
c Nullor
d Infinite-gain controlled source embedded in u general 3-port network
e Replacement .of controlled source by two l-ports
(4)
or a finite Zmatrix
[V] = [Z][l]
(5)
r33 + or 3 2
PROC. 1EE, Vol. 116, No. II, NOVEMBER 1969
A
o
N
o
B
-o
i>
>
Fig. 3
Two alternative nullor equivalent networks obtained from a single
nullator-norator equivalent network
a
N
Fig. 4
Replacement of nullors by physical networks
a Circuit containing one nullor
-02
1o
-O2'
ro-
Fig. 5
Nullator-norator equivalent circuits for n.i.c.s and n.i.i.s
a C.N.I.C.
1840
b V.N.l.C.
c N.I.I.
Realisation of gyrators
R{
+i
(10)
~ MJc.n.i.c.
+ /?,
0
(ID
Similarly
[A)gyr =
[Ali.i.i.
(12)
= [A]0.n.Lc. >
l/^Ju.n./.o
Fig. 6
Realisation of negative resistance
R.
1
Fig. 7
Gyrators realised by replacing a positive by
a negative resistance in an n.i.i.
a Nullors can be replaced by operational amplifiers
b Nullors can be replaced by transistors
-0 2
i'o-
-O2'
o2
Fig. 8
Gyrators realised by
n.i.c.s and n.i.i.s
cascading
1969
1841
Table 2
ZPARAMETERS OF GYRATOR CIRCUITS
Gyrator 2
Gyrator 1
-7?,
Zxx
Kl(Gi + \)(R 4-
-R2RG\G2
k\GxR2
G, - 1
RRxGxG2
-RxGx{R2
G, - 1
k\R2
G, - 1
z22
RKx\\J2 i U + R \\>x + 1)
R2)
D2
G, - 1
Zn
Gyrator 4
Gyrator 3
-G2R2{Rx
+ R(G 2 + 1)}
D2
R(G2 + 1)(7? +
+ R(Gx + 1)}
7*2)
D2
G2
G2
- I)(C2 - I) + ,
c,
o2
-o2'
Fig. 9
Gyrator circuits using operational amplifiers
a Circuit obtained by replacing a positive by a negative resistance
b Circuit obtained by cascading a c.n.i.c. and an n.i.i.
c and el Alternative circuits obtained by using the theory of singular elements
1842
PROC.
/EE,
NOVEMBER
1969
input impedance, zero output impedance and finite differential gain G, analysis gives the Zparameters summarised in
Table 2. In the analysis, the diodes whose action will be
explained in Section 6 are assumed to have infinite resistance
in both the forward and reverse directions. In practice, the
diodes have large resistances in both directions for only small
bias voltages, and, consequently, their use limits the voltagehandling capacity of the gyrator circuit.
Stability theory
(13)
Gou>c
(14)
where Go and wc are the d.c. gain and the dominant pole
respectively (wc is a positive constant). The region \s] < coc
in the $ plane is of interest, and Gx and G2 in the Z parameters
can be assumed to be real. From eqn.,13 the natural frequencies can be calculated for a series of pairs of amplifier
gains in the range 0 < G^or G2) < Gmax where G2 = KGX
(K is a positive constant). For G, = G2 = 0 a passive RC
network with natural frequencies on the negative real axis
of the s plane exists. When G, and G2 > I, one of the
capacitances is converted to an inductance and an LC resonant circuit results; the natural frequencies are complex
conjugate and lie adjacent to the j axis. Such results have
been obtained for gyrator circuits 1-4, and they can be
represented by root-locus diagrams as shown in Table 3.
ReZ 12 Z 2l
(15)
(16)
for all attainable values of Gx and G2 [i.e. 0 < G|(or G2) < Gmax
where Gmax < oo]. Eqns. 15 and 16 give
ReZ 22 > 0
(17)
11
2-port loaded by an
(18)
Table 3
ROOT-LOCUS DIAGRAMS
gyrator I
Gi = G2
s plane
gyrator 2
gyrator 2
Gi=2G2
gyrator 3or4
Gi=G 2
-O3
-O3
C, = I F , C2 =~ 10 F, R
OJ is in rad/s
I O, Gmax = 105
The first column shows that gyrator,circuit I attains a zerofrequency (d.c.) unstable mode. Gyrator circuit 2 attains a
low-frequency unstable mode in some cases, for example
when G, = 2G2 and C2 = 10Ct. In effect, circuits 1 and 2
are conditionally stable in a sense similar to that of Bode,28
and sometimes they become unstable.
In practice, an unstable mode may be attained while the
amplifier gains are rising from zero just after activatiorii. The
oscillation amplitude during the unstable mode can rise
sufficiently to saturate the amplifiers. The effective amplifier
gains will cease to rise owing to the nonlinearity of the
dynamic characteristics of the amplifiers, and consequently,
PROC. IEE, Vol. 116, No. II, NOVEMBER 1969
Z,(s) - = -
Zn(s)ZL(s)
(19)
R{s2
N(s)
D(s)
a>2(Go + 1)}
(20)
2GO + 2)
+ OJC(GO + 2)s
Since R and a>c > 0 and Go > 0, the zeros of N(s) and D(s)
are in the left-half ^plane. From eqn. 20,
Bu>2 + C)
ReZ,,(yo>) =
(21)
. .
(22)
Experimental results
The parameter wc is a function of the compensating
elements, and it should be chosen sufficiently small to eliminate high-frequency-unstable modes. However, a small value
of coc will yield a gyrator circuit with a small bandwidth.
In practice, the choice of coc depends on the type of amplifier
and inversely on the size of Go.
Some preliminary computer calculations have shown that
a finite amplifier input resistance and a nonzero output
resistance can produce Qfactor enhancement which may
result in negative Q factors.
The gyrator circuit 4 has been built using amplifiers
type 709C. Initial measurements have shown that the
Q factor enhancement is sometimes present, but this can be
eliminated by selecting the compensation.
After selecting satisfactory frequency compensations, the
Q factor and gyration constant (km) were measured for a
nominal gyration constant knom = 106 (knom R^R2). The
results are shown in Figs, lla and b. Polystyrene capacitors
were used.
At low frequencies, the deviation in the gyration constant,
as shown in Fig. 116, is small and the inductance simulated
is relatively independent of amplifier-gain variations. The
temperature coefficient of km may therefore be prescribed by
selecting the temperature coefficients of the gyrator resistors
and of the load capacitor. Fig. Ma shows that larger
Q factors are feasible in comparison to those encountered in
coils.
8
Generalised-impedance converters
Consider a 2-port network in which the input impedance is a transform of the load impedance, that is
Zi=f{s)ZL
R2l{Zu(s) + ZL(s)}
and
are also p.r. functions. Thus Zt(s) is p.r. and can be realised
by the passive network shown in Fig. 10.
In effect, the imperfections of gyrator circuits 3 and 4, due
ideal passive gyrator
(23)
I\
(24)
X-h)
or as
(26)
i
O R
Fig. 10
f(s)
(27)
lv.g.i.c.
0
(28)
1969
10 OOO pr
1OOO -
1OO -
1O
1O
frequency, kHz
1OO
<OO
frequency , kHz
b
Fig. 11
Experimental results for gyrator 4 having gyration constant ArH=
a
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
form k3s, \/k3s, k4s2 and \/k4s2 are possible (k3 and k4 are
positive constants) by using only resistances and capacitances.
Also in the particular case when Z{-Z4 are resistive, the
c.g.i.c. of Fig. \2e becomes a current-conversion positiveimpedance convertor. This can be used for impedancematching purposes in the same way as a transformer.
9
circuits are 4-terminal. The methods of Riordan and GorskiPopiel use gyrator circuits as g.i.c.s, and, in effect, GorskiPopiel's method is an interesting generalisation of that of
10:1
f:1
(30)
[VA] = [ZA][IA]
A
A
where [V ] and [I ] are voltage and current vectors. Using
identical c.g.i.c.s from eqn. 26, VA = Vf, VA Vf,. . ., i.e.,
f (s):
r
z, - >
T
Fig.12
Generalised-impedance con vert ors
uandb Symbols for 4-terminal and 3-terminal v.g.i.c.
cand (I Symbols for 4-terminal and 3-terminal e.g.i.e.
(a resistance of I fi across port 2 causes an input impedance/(j); hence
the notation/(j):l)
e Practical e.g.i.e. circuit derived from gyrator circuit of Fig. 9c (or d)
7344
Fig. 13
Realisation of inductive
5999
ft
ft
J
14 87O =
1O 74O
7564
ft
)C
18 22O!
J
C
26 42O
subnetworks
1
k-1O
Fig. 14
Highpass filter
a /?i.C-passive realisation
b /?C-active realisation
(Inductances in henrys, capacitances in picofarads, resistances in kilohms: gyration constant k
1846
10*)
PROC.
1969
Similarly IA ~f(s)IB, IA =
, , i.e.
02)
]
(33)
10.1
Highpass filter
10
(34)
(s2 + 0-6261)
(s2 +0-2550s + 1-5072)
(s2 + 0-8178)
(s2 +0-05221* + 1-1933)
. . . . (35)
- 3 0
-6-O
-1O-O
-8O
O-672
-O-2
-O-2
-O-4
-0-4
1-O9O
kHz
1-O9O
1-120
2-013
1-120
kHz
kHz
-O-2
-0-4
Fig. 15
Frequency response of highpass filter
1-O9O
1-105
1-120
kHz
e
PROC.
IEE,
NOVEMBER
1969
1847
of 1500 Hz, and a bandwidth of 60 Hz. A suitable approximation is the elliptic transfer function,
T{s) =
2-397
2-111
(*2 + 0-8818)
0-003977*
s + 0-03080* + 1
2
(* + 001312* +0-9577)
(*2 + 11341)
(* + 0-01370* + 10442) "
1OO
4697
34 490
-3264
f0
: 15OO
5333
34 49O!SS
1598
1408
jO-3264 MOO
15OO Hz
M-O88
7O36
f(rt:
fc>
4697
1OO
SS34 49O
5333
34 4 9 0 = 1OO
Fig. 16
Bandpass filter
a /?LC-passive realisation
b /?C-active realisation
(L's in H, C's in pF, R's in kCl,f(s) - 3 x IO-s)
10.2
Bandpass filter
(36)
11
1969
671
-O-2
MHUM^II
mmm/Mmmmw
-0-4
Mi
-0-2
-O-4
-O-2
-0*4
1*671
1-47O
Fig.17
Frequency response of bandpass filter
a Logarithmic gain scale and linear frequency scale
b Linear gain and frequency scales
c Frequency response for supply voltage of + 10V (left-hand curve) + 15V and
+ 20V (right-hand curve), input level of 2V
(I Frequency response for supply voltage of + 10V (left-hand curve), + 15V and
20V (right-hand curve), input level of 0 0 5 V
e and/Frequency response at temperatures of 10C (left-hand curve), 20Cand
70C (right-hand curve)
12
Conclusions
gains can be built. This has been illustrated by the highpassfilter design. The gyrator circuits described can be treated as
g.i.c.s, which are used for the simulation of floating inductances. The bandpass filter using g.i.c.s has been found
to be relatively insensitive to temperature and supply-voltage
variations.
13
Acknowledgments
References
1850
1969