Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASNT
Conl"inuing
ducal"ion
In Nondes'lruc'live
Tes'ling
The Eddy Current Level Ill Study Guide was prepared by:
A. L. Lucero
Publication and review of this Study Guide was under the direction of the Personnel Training and
Certification Committee of the American Society for Nondestructive Testing:
Ward D. Rummel
Carl Shaw
Jack C. Spanner, Vice-Chairman
John L. Summers
John H. Weiler
CONTENTS
Figures/Tables
References
vi
Foreword
vii
Preface
1.
viii
Historical Background
1
Generation of Eddy Currents
2
Field Intensity
3
Current Density
6
Phase/Amplitude and Current/Time Relationships
2.
10
Probe Coils
10
Encircling Coils
11
Bobbin Coils
12
Absolute Coils
13
Differential Coils
13
Hybrid Coils
14
Additional Coil Characteristics
3.
14
16
Resistance
16
Inductance
16
Inductive Reactance
18
Impedance
19
Q or Figure of Merit
20
Permeability and Shielding Effects
Coil Fixtures
21
4.
21
24
Electrical Conductivity
Permeability
26
Skin Effect
26
Edge Effect
26
26
End Effect
Lift-Off
27
Fill Factor
27
Discontinuities
28
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
24
29
iii
5.
Frequency Selection
31
Single Frequency Systems
Multifrequency Systems
6.
31
31
36
Impedance Testing
41
Phase Analysis Testing
42
Vector Point
42
Ellipse
43
Linear Time Base
44
Modulation Analysis Testing
45
Test Object Handling Equipment
7.
40
Instrument Systems
49
52
Readout Mechanisms
Indicator Lights
52
Audio Alarms
52
Meters
52
Digital Displays
52
CRTs
53
Recorders
54
Computers
55
8.
Applications
57
Flaw Detection
57
Dimensional Measurements
58
Conductivity Measurements
58
Hardness Measurements
59
Alloy Sorting
59
9.
ASTM
MIL-STD
ASME
61
61
62
62
72
iv
FIGURES/TABLES
Figure
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.10
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.10
6.11
6.12
6.13
5
5
13
19
24
27
33
33
7.4
Table 4.1
7.1
7.2
7.3
44
47
53
25
REFERENCES
1. Recommended Practice No. SNT-TC-1A (1980 Edition), Supplement E. 1980. American Society for
Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, Ohio.
2. General Dynamics-CT-6-5 Eddy Current Testing, Programmed Instruction Handbooks, Volume 1, 1967;
Volume 2, 1967. General Dynamics Convair Division, San Diego, California.
3. General Dynamics-PI-4-5 Eddy Current Testing, Programmed Instruction Handbooks, Volume 1, 1967;
Volume 2, 1967. General Dynamics Convair Division, San Diego, California.
4. H.L. Libby, Introduction to Electromagnetic Nondestructive Test Methods. 1971. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
New York, New York.
5. R.C. McMaster, ed., Nondestructive Testing Handbook. 1959. American Society for Nondestructive Testing,
Columbus, Ohio.
6. W.J. McGonnagle, Nondestructive Testing, 2d ed. 1975. Gordon and Breach Publishing Company, New York,
New York.
7. R.S. Sharpe, Research Techniques in Nondestructive Testing, Volume 1, 1970. Academic Press, New York,
New York.
8. R.S. Sharpe, Research Techniques in Nondestructive Testing, Volume 2, 1973. Academic Press, New York,
New York.
9. Metals Handbook, Properties and Selection of Materials, 8th ed. 1961. American Society for Metals, Metals
Park, Ohio.
10. J.L. Taylor, ed., Basic Metallurgy for Nondestructive Testing. 1974. British Institute of Nondestructive
Testing, Essex, England.
11. Nondestructive Evaluation in the Nuclear Industry (1980). 1981. American Society for Metals, Metals Park,
Ohio.
12. Eddy Current Characterization of Materials and Structures-ASTM, STP 722. 1981. American Society for
Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
13. Eddy Current Nondestructive Testing-NBS Special Publication 589. 1981. National Bureau of Standards,
Washington, D.C.
14. D.J. Hagemaier and A.P. Steinberg, "Low Frequency Eddy Current Inspection of Aircraft Structure."
Materials Evaluation, Vol. 40, No. 2, Feb. 1982, pp. 206-210. American Society for Nondestructive Testing,
Columbus. Ohio.
15. MIL-STD-1537A (USAF) "Electrical Conductivity Test for Measurement of Heat Treatment of Aluminum
Alloys, Eddy Current Method." June 1981. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C.
16. MIL-STD-271E (SHIPS) "Nondestructive Testing Requirements for Metals." 1973. U.S. Department of
Defense, Washington, D.C.
17. ASME Section VI, 1980 edition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, New York.
18. 1982 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 11 Metallography; Nondestructive Testing. 1982. American
Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
19. Metals Handbook, Nondestructive Inspection and Quality Control. 1976. American Society for Metals,
Metals Park, Ohio.
vi
FOREWORD
The Personnel Training and Certification Committee of ASNT has prepared a series of Levell! I Study
Guides which are intended to present the major areas in each nondestructive testing method. The
Levell II candidate should use this Study Guide only as a review, as it does not contain all of the information necessary to pass a typical Level Ill examination.
In using this Study Guide, the reader will be given specific references, including page numbers,
where detailed information can be obtained. Typical Level Ill questions are available at the end of
each section to aid in determining comprehension of the material.
A typical use of this Study Guide might include the following sequence:
1. An individual should review the questions at the end of each section in the Study Guide to
determine if his or her comprehension of the eddy current method is adequate. The questions will serve as an indicator of the individual's ability to pass a Level Ill examination.
2. If the individual finds questions in a certain section of the Study Guide to be difficult, it is
suggested that the individual carefully study the information presented in that section. This
review of the information in the Study Guide will serve to refresh one's memory of theory and
forgotten facts.
3. If the individual encounters information that is new or not clearly understood, then it is important to note the specific references given throughout the Study Guide and carefully read
this information. References are indicated by parentheses and the reference number: (N).
vii
PREFACE
Early experimenters in the field of magnetism and electromagnetism established the basis for the
principles of electromagnetic nondestructive examination used today.
In 1824, Arago discovered that the vibration of a magnetic needle was rapidly damped when it was
placed near a nonmagnetic conducting disk. In 1820, Oersted discovered the magnetic field surrounding a conductor when current was passed through the conductor. In 1820, Ampere discovered that
equal currents flowing in opposite directions in adjacent conductors cancelled the magnetic effect.
This discovery has led to development of modern coil arrangements and shielding techniques. Faraday discovered the principles of electromagnetic induction in 1831. Maxwell integrated the results
of these and other works in a two-volume work published in 1873, and Maxwell's equations are still
the basis for investigations of the magnetic and electromagnetic phenomena.
The application of these laws and principles has led to the development of an industry whose purpose is to qualitatively and quantitatively investigate the properties and characteristics of conducting materials using nondestructive electromagnetic techniques.
As in any industry, controls and guidelines must be established to insure consistent and reproducible products or services. This Study Guide is intended to provide ASNT Level Ill Eddy
Current Method candidates with a concise reference with which to prepare for the ASNT Level Ill
examination.
viii
1.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Before discussing the principles of eddy current testing, it seems appropriate to discuss briefly
facets of magnetism and electromagnetism that serve as the foundation for our study of eddy current testing.
In the period from 1775 to 1900, scientific experimenters Coulomb, Ampere, Faraday, Oersted,
Arago, Maxwell, and Kelvin investigated and cataloged most of what is known about magnetism and
electromagnetism.
Arago discovered that the oscillation of a magnet was rapidly damped when a nonmagnetic
conducting disk was placed near the magnet (Fig. 1.1). He also observed that by rotating the disk,
the magnet was attracted to the disk. In effect, Arago had introduced a varying magnetic field to the
disk causing eddy currents to flow in the disk producing a magnetic field by the disk that attracted
the magnet. Arago's simple model is a basis for many automobile speedometers used today.
MOTION
MAGNET
CONDUCTING PLATE
Oersted discovered the presence of a magnetic field around a current-carrying conductor, and he
observed a magnetic field developed in a perpendicular plane to the direction of current flow in a
wire. Ampere observed that equal and opposite currents flowing in adjacent conductors cancelled
this magnetic effect. Ampere's observation is used in differential coil applications and to manufacture noninductive, precision resistors. Faraday's first experiments investigated induced currents by
the relative motion of magnet and a coil (Fig. 1.2).
,-,,
f'( I
1S1 I
I I I
I II II
I
I I I
1 I I
1 I I
I
~1
'I 'I''
(a)
Figure 1.2-lnduced Current with Coil and Magnet
(b)
Faraday's major contribution was the discovery of electromagnetic induction. His work can be summarized by the example shown in Figure 1.3. Coil A is connected to a battery through a switch S. A
second coil 8 connected to a galvanometer G is nearby. When switch S is closed producing a current in coil A in the direction shown, a momentary current is induced in coil 8 in a direction(- a) opposite to that in A. If Sis now opened, a momentary current will appear in coil 8 having the direction
of(- b). In each case, current flows in coil 8 only while the current in coil A is changing.
The electromotive force (voltage) induced in coil 8 of Figure 1.3 can be expressed as follows:
E
Nll<P
Kilt
where:
E
N
il<P
ilt
K
= 10
Maxwell produced a two-volume work "A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism" first published in
1873. Maxwell not only chronicled most of the work done in electricity and magnetism at that time,
but he also developed and published a group of relations known as Maxwell's equations for the electromagnetic field. These equations form the base that mathematically describes most of what is
known about electromagnetism today (13).
In 1849 Lord Kelvin applied Bessel's equation to solve the elements of an electromagnetic field.
The principles of eddy current testing depend on the process of electromagnetic induction. This process includes a test coil through which a varying or alternating current is passed. A varying current
flowing in a test coil produces a varying electromagnetic field about the coil. This field is known as
the primary field.
When an electrically conducting test object is placed in the primary field, an electrical current will
be induced in the test object. This current is known as the eddy current. Figure 1.4 is a simple model
that illustrates the relationships of primary and induced (eddy) currents. Conductor A represents a
portion of a test coil. Conductor 8 represents a portion of a test object.
2
CONDUCTOR 8
CONDUCTOR A
Following Lenz's law and indicating the instantaneous direction of primary current lp, a primary field
q,p is developed about Conductor A. When Conductor B is brought into the influence of ci>p, an eddy
current IE is induced in Conductor B. This electrical current IE produces an electromagnetic field q,E
that opposes the primary electromagnetic field ci>p. The magnitude of q,E is directly proportional to
the magnitude of IE.
Characteristic changes in Conductor B such as conductivity, permeability, or geometry will cause IE
to change. When IE varies, q,E also varies. Variations of q,E are reflected to Conductor A by changes in
ci>p.
These changes are detected and displayed on some type of readout mechanism that relates these
variations to the characteristic that is of interest.
FIELD INTENSITY
Figure 1.5 presents a schematic view of an excited test coil. The electromagnetic field produced
about the unloaded test coil in Figure 1.5 can be described as decreasing in intensity with distance
from the coil and also varying across the coil's cross section. The electromagnetic field is most intense near the coil's surface.
GENERATOR
The field produced about this coil is directly proportional to the magnitude of applied current, rate of
change of current or frequency, and the coil parameters. Coil parameters include inductance,
diameter, length, thickness, number of turns of wire, and core material.
To better understand the principles under discussion, we must again look at the instantaneous relationships of current and magnetic flux. The exciting current is supplied to the coil by an alternating
current generator or oscillator.
With a primary current lp flowing through the coil, a primary electromagnetic field <t>p is produced
about the coil. When this excited test coil is placed on a conducting test object, eddy currents IE will
be generated in that test object. Figure 1.6 illustrates this concept.
GENERATOR
Note the direction of lp, <t>p, and the resultant eddy current IE. Although Figure 1.6 shows IE by directional arrows on the surface of the test object, IE extends into the test object some distance. Another
important observation is that IE is generated in the same plane in which the coil is wound. Figure 1.7
emphasizes this point with a loop coil surrounding a cylindrical test object (4).
A more precise method of describing the relationships of magnetic flux, voltage, and current is the
phase vector diagram or phasor diagrams (4).
Ep
E = Ep
(a)
~----L
___
L...__ _ __
<l>p
<l>s
PRIMARY
MAGNETIC FLUX
SECONDARY
MAGNETIC FLUX = 0
Ep~
Es~
(b)
E= E T - - t - - -
<I>
SECONDARY
MAGNETIC FLUX
EXCITATION CURRENT
I
_____...._..__ _ ____,..__ _ _ __
<l>p
PRIMARY
MAGNETIC FLUX
Coil Voltage
Primary Voltage
Excitation Current
Primary Magnetic Flux
Secondary Magnetic Flux
The current (I) and primary magnetic flux (<I>P) are plotted in phase, and the primary voltage (Ep) is
shown separated by 90 electrical degrees.
Secondary magnetic flux <I>s is plotted at zero because without a test object no secondary flux exists.
Figure 1.8b represents the action of placing a non-ferromagnetic test object into the test coil. The
components of phasor diagram 1.8b for a loaded coil are as follows:
E
ET
Ep
Es
cl>p
<l>s
<I>T
I
= Coil Voltage
Secondary Voltage
Primary Magnetic Flux
Secondary Magnetic Flux
Loaded Coil Magnetic Flux
Excitation Current
5
Observing Figure 1.8b we can see by vectorial addition of Ep and Es we arrive at a new coil voltage
(ET) for the loaded condition. The primary magnetic flux <I>p and secondary magnetic flux <I>s are also
combined by vectorial addition to arrive at a new magnetic flux (<I>T) for the loaded coil. Notice that
for the condition of the test object in the test coil, <I>T is not in phase with the excitation current I.
Also observe that the included angle between the excitation current and the new coil voltage Ep is
no longer 90 electrical degrees. These interactions will be discussed in detail later in this study
guide.
CURRENT DENSITY
The distribution of eddy currents in a test object varies exponentially. The current density in the test
object is most dense near the test coil. This exponential current density follows the mathematical
rules for a natural exponential decay curve (1/ 8 ). Usually a natural exponential curve is illustrated by a
graph with the ordinate (Y axis) representing magnitude and the abscissa (X axis) representing time
or distance. A common point described on such a graph is the "knee" of the curve. The knee occurs
at the 37 percent value on the ordinate axis. This 37 percent point, or knee, is chosen because
changes in X axis values produce significant changes in Y axis values from 100 percent to 37 percent, and below 37 percent changes in X axis values produce less significant changes in Y axis
values.
Applying this logic to eddy current testing, a term is developed to describe the relationship of current density in the test object. Consider the eddy current generated at the surface of the test object
nearest the test coil to be 100 percent of the available current, the point in the test object thickness
where this current is diminished to 37 percent is known as the standard depth of penetration (4).
Figure 1.9 is a relative eddy current density curve for a plane wave of infinite extent with magnetic
field parallel to the conducting test object surface.
1.01
;:)
6=1.88
!
I
o.37r--------
X~
o
0
w
w
oL---~--------~========-1
2
3
4
5
>
~
..J
DEPTH X
a:
DEPTH OF PENETRATION
Figure 1.9-Relative Eddy Current Density (Reprinted [adapted] with permission from Hugo L. Libby,
Introduction to Electromagnetic Nondestructive Test Methods, p. 26. Copyright1971, John Wiley
& Sons, Inc.)
The current density at any depth can be calculated as follows:
where:
Jx
J0
7f
Jl
= Depth from
surface, meters
Electric conductivity, mhos per meter
Magnetic permeability
fl
= flrflo
where:
flr
flo
= Relative
= 47r 10-
permeability
H/m
o = ._)?Tffla
where:
o =
7T
fl
= 3.1416
= Frequency in hertz
= Magnetic permeability, H/m
= Electric conductivity, mhos per meter
It should be observed at this point that as frequency, conductivity, or permeability is increased, the
penetration of current into the test object will be decreased.
We can use the graph in Figure 1.9 (p. 6) to demonstrate many eddy current characteristics. Using an
example of a very thick block of stainless steel being interrogated with a surface or probe coil
operating at a test frequency of 100 kilohertz (kHz), we can determine the standard depth of penetration and observe current densities at other depths.
Stainless steel (300 Series) is non-ferromagnetic. Magnetic permeability (!l) is 4?r 10-7 H/m and the
conductivity is 0.14 107 mhos per meter for 300 Series stainless steel.
0
0
= ._)?Tffla
= --/3.1416.
0.14. 107
b
8
= 743.438
= 0.00135 meters
o = 1.35 mm
Using 1.35 mm as depth X from surface a ratio of depth/depth of penetration would be 1. Referring to
Figure 1.9, a depth/depth of penetration of 1 indicates a relative eddy current density of 0.37 or
37 percent. What is the relative eddy current density at 3 mm?
Depth X equals 3 mm and depth of penetration is 1.35 mm, therefore:
3
1.35
2.222
This ratio indicates a relative eddy current density of about 0.1 or 10 percent. With only 10 percent of
the available current flowing at a depth of 3 mm, detectability of variables such as conductivity,
permeability, and discontinuities would be very difficult to detect. The obvious solution for greater
detectability at the 3 mm depth is to lower the test frequency. Frequency selection will be covered in
detail later in this text.
Figure 1.10 reveals another facet of the eddy current. Eddy currents are not generated at the same instant in time throughout the part. Eddy currents require time to penetrate the test part. Phase and
time are analogous; i.e., phase is an electrical term used to describe timing relationships of electrical waveforms.
5
4
EDDY CURRENT
PHASE ANGLE
RADIANS LAGGING
3
2
1
0
DEPTH X
DEPTH OF PENETRATION
Figure 1.10-Eddy Current Phase Angle Radians Lagging (Reprinted [adapted] with permission from Hugo L.
Libby, Introduction to Electromagnetic Nondestructive Test Methods, p. 26. Copyright1971,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
Phase is usually expressed in either degrees or radians. There are 21r radians per 360 degrees. Each
radian therefore is approximately 57 degrees.
Using the surface current phase angle near the test coil as a reference, phase angle current deeper
in the test object lags the surface current. The amount of phase lag is determined by
8 = X-,htp.a = Depth/Depth of Penetration,
where 8 equals the phase angle lag in radians.
Figure 1.10 should be used as a relative indicator of phase lag. The exact phase relationship for a
particular system may be different due to other variables, such as coil parameters and excitation
methods.
The amount of phase lag for a given part thickness is an important factor when considering resolution. Resolution is the ability to separate variables occurring in the test object; for example,
distinguishing two discontinuities occurring at different depths in the same test object.
As an example, let us establish a standard depth of penetration at 1 mm in a 5 mm thick test object.
Refer to Figure 1.10 and observe the phase lag of the current at one standard depth of penetration.
Where depth of interest (X) is 1 mm and depth of penetration (o) is 1 mm, the X/o ratio is 1 and the current at depth X lags the surface current by 1 radian.
Projecting this examination, let us observe the phase lag for the entire part thickness. The standard
depth of pe-Rtrrfation is 1 mm, the part thickness is 5 mm; therefore, the ratio Xlo equals 5. This produces= phase lag of 5 radians or approximately 287 degrees for the part thickness. Having a
measurement capability of 1 degree increments, the part thickness could be divided into 287 parts,
each part representing 0.017 mm. That would be considered excellent resolution.
There is an obvious limitation. Refer to Figure 1.9 and observe the resultant relative current density
with an Xlo ratio of 5. The relative current density is near 0.
It should become apparent that the frequency can be adjusted to achieve optimum results for a particular variable. These and other variables will be discussed in Section 5 of this study guide.
8
REVIEW QUESTIONS
0.11
0.1-2
B.
C.
D.
0.1-3
When a non-ferromagnetic part is placed in the test coil, the coil's voltage:
A.
increases.
B.
remains constant because this is essential.
C. decreases.
D.
shifts 90 degrees in phase.
0.1-4
Refer to Figure 1.8b (p. 5): If ET was produced by the test object being stainless steel, what
would the effect be if the test object were copper?
A.
ET would decrease and be at a different angle.
B. ET would increase and be at a different angle.
C. Because both materials are non-ferromagnetic, no change occurs.
D. None of the above.
0.1-5
0.1-6
0.1-7
A standard depth of penetration is defined as the point in a test object where the relative eddy
current density is reduced to:
A.
25 percent.
B.
37 percent.
c. 50 percent.
D.
100 percent.
0.18
Refer to Figure 1.9 (p. 6). If one standard depth of penetration was established at 1 mm in an object 3 mm thick, what is the relative current density on the far surface?
A.
3
B.
<0.1
c. 1/3
D.
Indeterminate
0.19
Refer to Figure 1.10 (p. 8). Using the example in question 1.8, what is the phase difference between the near and far surfaces?
A.
Far surface leads near surface by sr
B.
Far surface leads near surface by 171 o
C.
Far surface lags near surface by 171 o
D.
Far surface lags near surface by 57 o
0.110
= 5.7
2.
Test coils can be categorized into three main mechanical groups: probe coils, bobbin coils, and encircling coils (5).
PROBE COILS
Surface coil, probe coil, flat coil, or pancake coil are all common terms used to describe the same
test coil type. Probe coils provide a convenient method of examining the surface of a test object.
Figure 2.1 illustrates a typical probe coil used for surface scanning.
Probe coils and probe coil forms can be shaped to fit particular geometries to solve complex inspection problems. As an example, probe coils fabricated in a pencil shape (pencil probe) are used to inspect threaded areas of mounting studs and nuts or serrated areas of turbine wheels and turbine
blade assemblies. Probe coils may be used where high resolution is required by adding coil
shielding (2).
When using a high-resolution probe coil, the test object surface must be carefully scanned to assure
complete inspection coverage. This careful scanning is very time consuming. For this reason, probe
coil inspections of large test objects are usually limited to critical areas. Probe coils are used extensively in aircraft inspection for crack detection near fasteners and fastener holes. In the case of
fastener holes (bolt holes, rivet holes), the probe coil is spinning while being withdrawn at a uniform
rate. This provides a helical scan of the hole using a "spinning probe" technique.
ENCIRCLING COILS
Encircling coil, 00 coil, and teed-through coil are terms commonly used to describe a coil that surrounds the test object. Figure 2.2 illustrates a typical encircling coil.
Encircling coils are primarily used to inspect tubular and bar-shaped products. The tube or bar is fed
through the coil (feed-through) at relatively high speed. The cross section of the test object within
the test coil is simultaneously interrogated. For this reason, circumferential orientation of discontinuities cannot be determined with an encircling coil (4).
The volume of material examined at one time is greater using an encircling coil than a probe coil;
therefore, the relative sensitivity is lower for an encircling coil. When using an encircling coil, it is
important to keep the test object centered in the coil. If the test object is not centered, a uniform
discontinuity response is difficult to obtain. It is common practice to run the calibration standard
several times, each time indexing the artificial discontinuities to a new circumferential location in
the coil. This procedure is used to insure proper response and proper centering.
11
BOBBIN COILS
Bobbin coil, 10 coil, and inside probe are terms that describe coils used to inspect from the inside
diameter (10) or bore of a tubular test object. Bobbin coils are inserted and withdrawn from the tube
10 by long, semiflexible shafts or simply blown in with air and retrieved with an attached pull cable.
These mechanisms will be described later in the text. Bobbin coil information follows the same
basic rules stated for encircling coils. Figure 2.3 illustrates a typical bobbin coil.
Probe coils, encircling coils, and bobbin coils can be additionally classified (5). These additional
classifications are determined by how the coils are electrically connected. The three coil categories
are absolute, differential, and hybrid.
Figure 2.4 shows various types of absolute and differential coil arrangements.
ABSOLUTE
"'....
UJ
....
iii
0
0
DIFFERENTIAL
:::;
0
a:
0
z
UJ
UJ
....
ID
::>
0
....UJ
iii
-{j~
Et
t-
-i
Iii
....
"'
0
0
UJ
ID
a:
Q.
....UJ
ID
::>
0
-B-~
12
I
.:.:::1 -
tL-
- ::::i:=d
8-
d()
ABSOLUTE COILS
An absolute coil makes its measurement without direct reference or comparison to a standard as
the measurement is being made (6). Some applications for absolute coil systems would be
measurements of conductivity, permeability, dimensions, and hardness.
DIFFERENTIAL COILS
Differential coils consist of two or more coils electrically connected to oppose each other. Differential coils can be categorized into two types. One is the self-comparison differential, and the other is
external reference differential.
The self-comparison differential coil compares one area of a test object to another area on the same
test object. A common use is two coils, connected opposing, so that if both coils are affected by
identical test object conditions, the net output is "0" or no signal. The self-comparison arrangement
is insensitive to test object variables that occur gradually. Variables such as slowly changing wall
thickness, diameter, or conductivity are effectively discriminated against with the self-comparison
differential coil.
Only when a different condition affects one or the other test coils will an output signal be generated.
The coils usually being mechanically and electrically similar allows the arrangement to be very
stable during temperature changes. Short discontinuities such as cracks, pits, or other localized
discontinuities with abrupt boundaries can be detected readily using the self-comparison differential coil.
The external reference differential coil, as the name implies, is when an external reference is used to
affect one coil while the other coil is affected by the test object (4). Figure 2.5 illustrates this concept. This system is used to detect differences between a standard object and test objects. It is particularly useful for comparative conductivity, permeability, and dimensional measurements. Obviously in Figure 2.5 it is imperative to normalize the system with one coil affected by the standard
object and the other coil affected by an acceptable test object. The external reference differential
coil system is sensitive to all measurable differences between the standard object and test object.
For this reason it is often necessary to provide additional discrimination to separate and define
variables present in the test object.
STANDARD
OBJECT
TEST
OBJECT
Figure 2.5-External Reference Differential System (Reprinted with permission from Hugo L. Libby, Introduction
to Electromagnetic Nondestructive Test Methods, p. 69. Copyright1971, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
13
HYBRID COILS
Hybrid coils may or may not be the same size and are not necessarily adjacent to each other (4).
Common types of the hybrid coil are Driver/Pickup, Through Transmission, or Primary/Secondary
coil assemblies. Figure 2.6 shows a typical hybrid arrangement.
Figure 2.6-Hybrid Coil (Reprinted with perm1ss1on from Hugo L. Libby, Introduction to Electromagnetic
Nondestructive Test Methods, p. 198. Copyright1971, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
A simple hybrid coil consists of an excitation coil and a sensing coil. In the through transmission
coil, the excitation coil is on one side of the test object and the sensing coil is on the other. The
voltage developed in the sensing coil is a function of the current magnitude and frequency applied
to the excitation coil, coil parameters of the exciting and sensing coils, and test object
characteristics.
In Figure 2.6 an encircling coil induces circumferential currents in a cylindrical test object, and the
disturbances of these currents are detected by a small probe coil.
REVIEW QUESTIONS
0.2-1
0.2-2
0.2-3
14
0.24
0.25
When inspecting a tubular product with an encircling coil, which statement is not true?
A.
OD discontinuities can be found.
B.
Axial discontinuity locations can be noted.
C.
Circumferential discontinuity locations can be noted.
D.
ID discontinuities can be found.
0.26
0.2-7
When coils in a differential arrangement are affected simultaneously with the same test object
variables, the output signal _ _ _ __
A.
is directly proportional to the number of variables.
B.
is "0" or near-"0."
C.
is indirectly proportional to the number of variables.
D.
is primarily a function of the exciting current.
0.28
0.29
A hybrid
A.
B.
C.
D.
0.210
15
3.
RESISTANCE
Resistance is an opposition to the flow of electrons and is measured in ohms. Ohm's law is stated
by the equation:
=R
where:
I
R
E
= Current in amperes
= .Resistance in ohms
= Electrical potential difference
in volts
The resistance of a coil is determined primarily by the length of wire used to wind the coil; its
specific resistance is determined by the type of wire (e.g., copper, silver) and the cross-sectional
area of the wire.
Resistance
= Specific Resistance
Length
Area
where:
Resistance
Specific Resistance
Area
Length
=
=
=
Ohms
Ohms/Circular mil-foot
Circular mils
Feet
Thus, the resistance of a 10-foot length of 40 gauge copper wire with a specific resistance of 10.4 circular mil-foot at 20 oc would be found as follows:
10.4 10
9.888
= 10.518 Ohms
In an alternating current circuit containing only resistance, the current and voltage are in phase. In
phase means the current and voltage reach their minimum and maximum values, respectively, at the
same time. The power dissipated in a resistive circuit appears in the form of heat. For example, electric toasters are equipped with resistance wires that become hot when current flows through them,
providing a heat source for toasting bread.
INDUCTANCE
Heat generation is an undesirable trait for an eddy current coil. If the 10-foot length of wire used in
the previous example was wound into the shape of a coil, it would exhibit characteristics of alternating current other than resistance. By forming the wire into the shape of a coil, the coil also would
have the property of inductance. The role of inductance is analogous to inertia in mechanics,
because inertia is the property of matter that causes a body to oppose any change in its velocity.
16
The unit of inductance is the henry (H). A coil is said to have the property of inductance when a
change in current through the coil produces a voltage in the coil. More precisely, a circuit in which
an electromotive force of one volt is induced when the current is changing at a rate of one ampere
per second will have an inductance of one henry.
The inductance of a multilayer air core coil can be expressed by its physical properties, or coil parameters. Coil parameters such as length, diameter, thickness, and number of turns of wire affect the
coil's inductance.
Figure 3.1 illustrates typical coil dimensions required to calculate coil inductance.
rr~
I
)ooo
)ol
)oo
)oo
I -jb~
Figure 3.1-Multilayer Coil (Zetec, Inc.)
0.8 (rN) 2
6r + 9t + 10b
where:
L
N
r
I
Self-inductance in microhenries(,uH)
Total number of turns
Mean radius in inches
Length of coil in inches
Coil depth or thickness in inches
=
=
=
b
N
0.1 inches
0.1 inches
0.1 inches
100 turns
0.8(100)
80
= - - = 32
2.5
0.6 + 0.9 + 1
32 microhenries inductance.
As stated earlier, this inductance is analogous to inertia in mechanical systems in that inductance
opposes a change in current as inertia opposes a change in velocity of a body. In alternating current
circuits the current is always changing; therefore inductance is always opposing this change. As the
current tries to change, the inductance reacts to oppose that change. This reaction is called inductive reactance.
17
INDUCTIVE REACTANCE
The unit of inductive reactance (XL) is in ohms. Because the amount of reactance is a function of the
rate of change of current and rate of change can be described as frequency, a formula relating frequency, inductance, and inductive reactance is:
where:
XL
f
=
=
For example, using the 32 microhenry coil calculated earlier, operating at 100 kilohertz, its inductive
reactance would be found as follows:
XL
L
f
27r
XL
XL
=
=
Inductive reactance
32 /LH or 0.000032H
100 kilohertz or 100,000 Hz
6.28
6.28 100,000 0.000032
20.096 ohms
Therefore, this coil would present an opposition of 20.096 ohms to currents with a rate of change of
100 kilohertz due to its reactive component. Unlike a resistive circuit, the current and voltage of an
inductive circuit do not reach their minimum and maximum values at the-same time. In a pure inductive circuit the voltage leads the current by 90 electrical degrees. This means that when the voltage
reaches a maximum value, the current is at "0."
Power is related to current and voltage as follows:
P
El
where:
P
E
I
=
=
=
Power in watts
Volts
Current in amperes
Notice that in a pure inductive circuit, when the voltage is maximum, the current is "0"; therefore,
the product El = 0. Inductive reactances consume no alternating power where resistive elements
consume power and dissipate power in the form of heat.
The opposition to current flow due to the resistive element of the coil and the reactive element of the
coil do not occur at the same time; therefore, they cannot be added as scalar quantities.
A scalar quantity is one having only magnitude; i.e., it is a quantity fully described by a number, but
which does not involve any concept of direction. Gallons in a tank, temperature in a room, miles per
hour, for example, are all scalars.
18
IMPEDANCE
In order to explain the addition of reactance and resistance with a minimum of mathematical calculations we can again use the vector diagram or phasor diagram to explain this addition (19). A phasor
diagram constructed with imaginary units on the ordinate. or (Y) axis and real units on the abscissa
or (X) axis is shown in Figure 3.2a.
>a:
<(
z
0
<(
::!
REAL
(a)
(b)
Substituting inductive reactance (XL) and resistance (R) we can find the resultant of the vector addition of XL and R. This resultant vector Z is known as impedance. Impedance is the total opposition to
current flow. Further observation of Figure 3.2b reveals XL, R, and Z appear to form the sides of a
right triangle. The mathematical solution of right triangles states the square of the hypotenuse is
equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides, or
further simplified:
Z=~X?+FP
Let's try an example. What is the impedance of a coil having an inductance of 100 microhenries and
a resistance of 5 ohms and being operated at 200 kilohertz?
First we must convert inductance to inductive reactance and then, by vector addition, combine inductive reactance and resistance to obtain the impedance.
XL
XL
XL
z
z
=
=
=
=
=
27rfl
6.28 o 200,000 Hz o 0.0001 H
6.28 o 20 = 125.6 ohms
.J52+125.6 2 = --)15800.36
125.7 ohms
19
The importance of knowing the impedance of the test coil is more one of instrument consideration
than coil design.
Maximum transfer of power is accomplished when the driving impedance and load impedance are
matched. If, for instance, your eddy current instrument had a driving impedance of 50 ohms, the
most efficient test coils would also have impedances of 50 ohms. Other, more common examples of
impedance matching are home stereo systems rated at 100 watts per channel into 8 ohms.
We can discuss impedance in a more detailed manner by mathematically noting variables using
imaginary numbers (4). The indicated square root of a negative number is known as an imaginary
number. The imaginary number .J=16 can be written v'(-1)16 or A v'l6 or A 4. The notation
A is used extensively and is mathematically noted by i. Since i is also used in electrical terms for
current, the i notation for electrical calculations is changed to j. The term j, often called operator j, is
equal to the ..;=-1. Instead of noting v'=16 as ../=14 we can simply note v'=16 as j4. Since reactance is known as an imaginary component, we can then note impedance Z = R + jXM = IZI.te. where
Tan
=XL.
r:l
5 ohms
In coil design it is often helpful to know also the included angle between the resistive component
and impedance. A convenient method of notation is the polar form where Tan e
XL and e is the
R
included angle between resistance and impedance. In the previous example our impedance
magnitude is 5 ohms, but at what angle?
= XL =
R
Arc Tan 8
= 36.9
= 5~6.9
Tan
= 0.750
Eddy current coils with included impedance angles of 60 o to 90 o usually make efficient test coils. As
the angle between resistance and impedance approaches 0 , the test coil becomes very inefficient
with most of its energy being dissipated as heat.
Q OR FIGURE OF MERIT
The term used to describe coil efficiency is Q or merit of the coil. The higher the Q or merit of a coil,
the more efficiently the coil performs as an inductor. The merit of a coil is mathematically stated as:
Q
XL
where:
XL
R
=
=
Inductive reactance
Resistance
For example, a coil having an inductive reactance of 100 ohms and a resistance of 5 ohms would
have a Q of 20.
20
The addition of permeable core materials in certain coil designs dramatically improves the Q factor.
Permeable cores are usually constructed of high permeability "powdered iron." Probe coils, for example, are wound on a form that allows a powdered iron rod or slug to be placed in the center of the
coil (4). It is common to increase the coil impedance by a factor of 10 by the addition of core
materials. This increase in impedance without additional winding greatly enhances the Q of the coil.
Some core materials are cylinder- or cup-shaped. A common term is cup core. The coil is wound and
placed in the cup core. In the case of a probe coil in a cup core, not only is the impedance increased,
but the benefit of shielding is also gained. Shielding with a cup core prevents the electromagnetic
field from spreading at the sides of the coil. This greatly reduces the signals produced by edge effect of adjacent members to the test area, such as fasteners on an aircraft wing. Shielding, while improving resolution, usually sacrifices some amount of penetration into the part.
Another method of shielding uses high conductivity material, such as copper or aluminum, to suppress high frequency interference from other sources and also to shape the electromagnetic field of
the test coil. A copper cup would restrict the electromagnetic field in much the same manner as the
"powdered iron cup core" discussed previously. A disadvantage of high conductivity, low or no permeability shielding is that the coil's impedance is reduced when the shielding material is placed
around the test coil. The net effect is, of course, that the coil's Q is less than it was when the coil
was surrounded by air.
Another coil design used for inspection of ferromagnetic materials uses a saturation approach. A
predominant variable that prevents eddy current penetration in ferromagnetic material is called permeability. Permeability effects exhibited by the test object can be reduced by means of magnetic
saturation. Saturation coils for steels are usually very large and surround the test object and test
coil. A steady state current is applied to the saturation coil. When the steel test object is magnetically saturated it may be inspected in the same manner as a non-ferromagnetic material. In the case of
mild steel many thousands of gauss are required to produce saturation. In such other materials as
nickel alloys (monel and inconel), the saturation required is much less and can usually be accomplished by incorporating permanent magnets adjacent to the test coil.
COIL FIXTURES
Coil fixtures or holders may be as varied as the imagination of the designers and users. After the
size, shape, and style have been decided upon, the next consideration should be the test environment.
Characteristics of wear, temperature, atmosphere, mechanical stress, and stability must be considered (4).
Normally wear can be reduced by selection of wear-resistant plastic compounds, or where severe
wear is expected, artificial or genuine jewels may be used. Less expensive and very effective wear
materials, such as aluminum oxide or ceramics, are more commonly used.
Temperature stability may be accomplished by using coil holder material with poor heat transfer
characteristics. Metals have high heat transfer characteristics, and often coils made with metal
holders are sensitive to temperature variations caused by human touch. For high temperature applications, materials must be chosen carefully. Most common commercial copper coil wire may be
used up to 150-200C. For temperatures above 200C, silver or aluminum wire with ceramic or high
temperature silicone insulation must be used.
Materials must be chemically compatible with the test object. As extreme examples, a polystyrene
coil form would not be used to inspect an acetone cooler, or a lead or graphite housing allowed to
come in contact with an inconel jet engine tail cone producing service-related stress cracks.
Mechanical and electrical stability of the test coil can be enhanced by an application of epoxy resin
between each layer of coil winding. This accomplishes many objectives: (1) it seals the coil to exclude moisture; (2) it provides additional electrical insulation; and (3) it provides mechanical
stability.
21
Characteristics listed are not in order of importance. The importance of each characteristic is deter
mined by specific test requirements.
REVIEW QUESTIONS
0.31
0.32
0.33
The unit
A.
B.
C.
D.
0.34
The inductance of a multilayer air core coil with the dimensions I= 0.2, r= 0.5, b = 0.1, and
N = 20, is:
A.
1.38 henries.
B.
13.8 microhenries.
C.
13.8 ohms.
D.
1.38 ohms.
0.35
The inductive reactance of the coil in 0.34, operating at 400 kHz, would be:
A.
1380 ohms.
B. 5520 ohms.
C. 34.66 ohms.
D. 3466 ohms.
0.36
The impedance of a 100 microhenry coil with a resistance of 20 ohms operating at 100 kHz
would be:
A.
62.8 ohms.
B.
4343.8 ohms.
C. 628 ohms.
D. 65.9 ohms.
0.37
of inductance is the:
henry.
maxwell.
ohm.
farad.
C.
XL,
D.
R
R
xL
0.38
0.39
0.310
23
4.
As we have seen, the eddy current technique depends on the generation of induced currents within
the test object. Perturbations or disturbances in these small induced currents affect the test coil.
The result is variance of test coil impedance due to test object variables. These are called operating
variables (19). Some of the operating variables are coil impedance, electrical conductivity, magnetic
permeability, skin effect, lift-off, fill factor, end effect, edge effect, and signal-to-noise ratio.
Coil impedance was discussed at length in the previous Section. In this Section coil impedance
changes will be represented graphically to more effectively explain the interaction of other operating
variables.
ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY
In electron theory the atom consists of a positive nucleus surrounded by orbiting negative electrons.
Materials that allow these electrons to be easily moved out of orbit around the nucleus are classified
as conductors. In conductors electrons are moved by applying an outside electrical force. The ease
with which the electrons are made to move through the conductor is called conductafce. A unit of
conductance is the mho. The mho is the reciprocal of the ohm, or conductance G = - , where G is
conductance in mhos and R is resistance in ohms.
R
In eddy current testing, instead of describing conductance in absolute terms, an arbitrary unit has
been assigned. Since the relative conductivity of metals and alloys varies over a wide range, the
need for a conductivity benchmark is of prime importance. The International Electrochemical Commission established in 1913 a convenient method of comparing one material to another. The commission established that a specified grade of high purity copper, 1 meter in length and uniform section of 1 mm 2 measuring 0.017241 ohms at 20 oc would be arbitrarily considered 100 percent conductive. The symbol for conductivity is a (sigma) and the unit is % lACS or percent of the International
Annealed Conductivity Standard.
Table 4.1 lists materials by conductivity and resistivity. A statement can be made about a conductor
in terms of conductance or resistance. Note that a good conductor is a poor resistor. Conductance
and resistance are direct reciprocals as stated earlier. Conductivity and resistivity, however, have
different origins and units; therefore, the conversion is not so direct. As previously discussed, conductivity is expressed on an arbitrary scale in % lACS. Resistivity is expressed in absolute terms of
micro ohm-centimeter. To convert to either unit, simply follow the equation:
%lACS
. . . ~ 72 ~ 1
As the test coil is influenced by different conductivities, its impedance varies inversely to conductivity. A higher conductivity causes the test coil to have a lower impedance value. Figure 4.1 illustrates this concept.
i\- ---------0%
(AIR)
"(
CONlUCTI1TY-
'\\
(.)
z
~
<
w
2%-._
(.)
5%
0::
10%
---~
---\.
100riACi . . . . .
RESISTANCE
---+
Figure 4.1-Measured Conductivity Locus (ASM Committee on Eddy Current Inspection, "Eddy-Current Inspection," Metals Handbook, Vol. 11, 8th Ed., Howard E. Boyer, Editor, American Society for Metals,
1976, p. 77.)
24
The coil's inductive reactance is represented by theY axis and coil resistance appears on the X axis.
The 0 percent conductivity point, or air point, is when the coil's empty reactance (XLo) is maximum.
Figure 4.1 represents a measured conductivity locus (4). Conductivity is influenced by many factors.
Table 4.1 (19, p. 206) lists conductivities of materials with different chemical compositions.
Table 4.1-Eiectrical Resistivity and Conductivity of Several Common Metals and Alloys (ASM Committee on
Eddy Current Inspection, "Eddy-Current Inspection," Metals Handbook, Vol. 11, 8th Ed., Howard E.
Boyer, Editor, American Society for Metals, 1976, p. 79.)
Resistivity
ohm-em
X 10-6
Metal or alloy
1.63
1.72
2.44
2.82
Silver
Copper, annealed
Gold
Aluminum
Aluminum alloys:
6061-T6
7075-T6
2024-T4
Magnesium
70-30 brass
Phosphor bronzes
Monel
Zirconium
Zircaloy-2
Titanium
Ti-6AI-4V alloy
304 stainless steel
lnconel 600
Hastelloy X
Waspaloy
4.1
5.3
5.2
4.6
6.2
16
48.2
50
72
54.8
172
70
98
115
123
Conductivity
%/ACS
105
100
70
61
42
32
30
37
28
11
3.6
3.4
2.4
3.1
1.0
2.5
1.7
1.5
1.4
Some other factors affecting conductivity are temperature, heat treatment, grain size, hardness, and
residual stresses. A change in the temperature of the test object will change the electrical conductivity of that object.
In metals, as the temperature is increased, the conductivity is decreased. Carbons and carbon compounds have negative temperature coefficients; therefore, their conductivity increases as temperature is increased.
Heat treatment also affects electrical conductivity by redistributing elements in the material.
Dependent upon materials and degree of heat treatment, conductivity can either increase or decrease as a result of heat treatment.
Stresses in a material due to cold working produces lattice distortion or dislocation (2). This mechanical process changes the grain structure and hardness of the material, changing its electrical
conductivity.
Hardness in "age hardenable" aluminum alloys changes the electrical conductivity of the alloy. The
electrical conductivity decreases as hardness increases. As an example, a Brinell hardness of 60 is
represented by a conductivity of 23, and a Brinell hardness of 100 of the same alloy would have a
conductivity of 19.
25
PERMEABILITY
Permeability of any material is a measure of the ease with which its atoms can be aligned, or the
ease with which it can establish lines of force (2). Materials are rated on a comparative basis. Air is
assigned a permeability of 1. A basic determination of permeability, f1- (pronounced "mu"), is:
f1-
= Number of
Ferromagnetic metals and alloys including nickel, iron, and cobalt tend to concentrate magnetic
flux lines (19). Ferromagnetic material or sintered ionic compounds are also useful in concentrating
magnetic flux (4).
Magnetic permeability is not constant for a given material. The permeability depends more upon the
magnetic field acting upon it. As an example, consider a magnetic steel bar placed in an encircling
coil. As the coil current is increased, the magnetic field of the coil will increase. The magnetic flux
within the steel will increase rapidly at first, and then will tend to level off as the steel approaches
magnetic saturation. This phenomenon is called the Barkhausen effect (4).
When increases in the magnetizing force produce little or no change on the flux within the steel bar,
the bar is magnetically saturated. When ferromagnetic materials are saturated, permeability becomes constant. With magnetic permeability constant, ferromagnetic materials may be inspected
using the eddy current method. Without magnetic saturation, ferromagnetic materials exhibit such a
wide range of permeability variat_ion that signals produced by discontinuities or conductivity variations are masked by the permeability signal (19).
Permeability effects are most predominant at lower frequencies (5). Other magnetic effects include
diamagnetic and paramagnetic (4).
SKIN EFFECT
Electromagnetic tests in many applications are most sensitive to test object variables nearest the
test coil due to skin effect. Skin effect is a result of mutual interaction of eddy currents, operating
frequency, test object conductivity, and permeability. The skin effect, the concentration of eddy currents in the test object nearest the test coil, becomes more evident as test frequency, test object
conductivity, and permeability are increased (4). For current density or eddy current distribution in
the test object, refer to Figure 1.9 in Section 1.
EDGE EFFECT
The electromagnetic field produced by an excited test coil extends in all directions from the coil. As
test object geometrical boundaries are approached by the test coil, they are sensed by the coil prior
to the coil's arrival at the boundary.
The coil's field precedes the coil by some distance (2) determined by coil parameters, operating frequency, and test object characteristics. As the coil approaches the edge of a test object, eddy currents become distorted by the edge signal. This is known as edge effect. Response to the edges of
test objects can be reduced by the incorporation of magnetic shields around the test coil or by
reducing the test coil diameter. Edge effect is a term most applicable to the inspection of sheets or
plates with a probe coil.
END EFFECT
End effect follows the same logic as edge effect. End effect is the signal observed when the end of a
product approaches the test coil. Response to end effect can be reduced by coil shielding or reducing coil length in OD encircling or ID bobbin coils. End effect is a term most applicable to the inspection of bar or tubular products.
26
LIFT-OFF
Electromagnetic coupling between test coil and test object is of prime importance when conducting
an eddy current examination. The coupling between test coil and test object varies with spacing between the test coil and test object. This spacing is called lift-off(4). The effect on the coil impedance
is called lift-off effect.
RESISTANCE - -
Figure 4.2-Lift-off Conductivity Relationship (ASM Committee on Eddy Current Inspection, "Eddy-Current Inspection," Metals Handbook, Vol. 11, 8th Ed., Howard E. Boyer, Editor, American Society for Metals,
1976, p. 79.)
Figure 4.2 shows the relationship between air, conductive materials, and lift-off. The electromagnetic field, as previously discussed, is strongest near the coil and dissipates with distance from the
coil. This fact causes a pronounced lift-off effect for small variations in coil-to-object spacing. As an
example, a spacing change from contact to 0.001 in. will produce a lift-off effect many times greater
than a spacing change of 0.010 in. to 0.011 in. (19). Lift-off effect is generally an undesired effect
causing increased noise and reduced coupling resulting in poor measuring ability (12). In some instances, equipment having phase discrimination capability can readily separate lift-off from conductivity or other variables. Lift-off can be used to advantage when measuring nonconductive
coatings on conductive bases. A nonconductive coating such as paint or plastic causes a space between the coil and conducting base, allowing lift-off to represent the coating thickness. Lift-off is
also useful in profilometry and proximity applications. Lift-off is a term most applicable to testing
objects with a surface or probe coil.
FILL FACTOR
Fill factor is a term used to describe how well a test object will be electromagnetically coupled to a
test coil that surrounds or is inserted into the test object. Fill factor then pertains to inspections using bobbin or encircling coils. Like lift-off, electromagnetic coupling between test coil and test object is most efficient when the coil is nearest the surface of the part.
Fill factor can be described as the ratio of test object diameter to coil diameter squared. The
diameters squared is a simplified equation resulting in the division of effective coil and part areas.
The area of a circle (A) is determined using the equation:
}appears in both numerator and denominator of the fractional equation; therefore~ cancels, leaving the ratio of diameters squared
g
2
TJ
Fill factor will always be a number less than 1, and efficient fill factors approach 1. A fill factor of
0.99 is more desirable than a fill factor of 0.75. The effect of fill factor on the test system is that poor
fill factors do not allow the coil to be sufficiently loaded by the test object. This is analogous to the
effect of drawing a bow only slightly and releasing an arrow. The result is, with the bow slightly
drawn and released, little effect is produced to propel the arrow.
27
In electrical terms, we say the coil is loaded by the test object. How much the coil is loaded by the
test object due to fill factor can be calculated in relative terms. A test system with constant current
capabilities being affected by a conductive nonmagnetic bar placed into an encircling coil can be
used to demonstrate this effect.
For this example, the system parameters are as follows:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
= Eo (1-71 + 1/J.teff)
where:
E0
E
11
P.eff
=
=
=
When the nonmagnetic test object is inserted into the test coil, the coil's voltage will decrease.
E
E
E
E
=
=
=
=
This allows 10- 4.3 or 5.7 volts available to respond to test object changes caused by discontinuities
or decreases in effective conductivity of the test object.
It is suggested that the reader calculate the resultant loaded voltage developed by a 0.5 inch bar of
the same material and observe the relative sensitivity difference.
28
Discontinuity orientation has a dramatic effect on response. As seen earlier, discontinuity response
is maximum when eddy currents and discontinuities are at 90, or perpendicular. Discontinuities
parallel to the eddy current flow produce little or no response. The easiest method to insure detectability of discontinuities is to use a reference standard or model that provides a consistent means of
adjusting instrumentation (12).
SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO
Signal-to-noise ratio is the ratio of signals of interest to unwanted signals (4). Common noise
sources are test object variations of surface roughness, geometry, and homogeneity. Other electrical noises can be due to such external sources as welding machines, electric motors and generators. Mechanical vibrations can increase test system noise by physical movement of test coil or test
object. In other words, anything that interferes with a test system's ability to define a measurement
is considered noise.
Signal-to-noise ratios can be improved by several methods. If a part is dirty or scaly, signal-to-noise
ratio can be improverl by cleaning the part. Electrical interference can be shielded or isolated. Phase
discrimination and f1irering can improve signal-to-noise ratio.
It is common practice in nondestructive testing to require a minimum signal-to-noise ratio of 3 to 1.
This means a signal of interest must have a response at least three times that of the noise at that
point.
REVIEW QUESTIONS
0.4-1
Materials
A.
B.
C.
D.
0.4-2
0.4-3
B.
11.032
0.0625
C.
16.52
D.
13.26
0.4-4
0.4-5
0.4-6
0.47
When an increase in field intensity produces little or no additional flux in a magnetic test object, the object is considered:
A.
stabilized.
B.
balanced.
C.
saturated.
D.
at magnetic threshold.
0.48
0.49
Lift-off signals produced by a 0-10 mil spacing change are approximately _ _ _ _ _ times
greater than a 80-90 mil spacing change.
A.
B.
C.
D.
10
2
5
100
0.410
Calculate the effect of fill factor when a conducting bar 0.5 inches in diameter with an effective
permeability of 0.4 is placed into a 1-inch diameter coil with an unloaded voltage of 10 volts.
The loaded voltage is _ _ _ __
A. 2 volts
B.
4.6 volts
C.
8.5 volts
D. 3.2 volts
0.411
0.412
Temperature changes, vibration, and environmental effects are test coil inputs that generate:
A.
unwanted signals.
B.
magnetic fields.
C.
eddy currents.
D.
drift.
30
5.
As NOT engineers and technicians, it is our responsibility to industry to provide and perform nondestructive examinations that in some way assure the quality or usefulness of industry products. In
order to apply a nondestructive test, it is essential that we understand the parameters affecting the
test. Usually, industry establishes a product or component and then seeks a method to inspect it.
This practice establishes test object geometry, conductivity, and permeability prior to the application of the eddy current examination. Instrumentation, test coil, and test frequency selection become the tools used to solve the problem of inspection. Test coils were discussed previously, and
instrumentation will be discussed later in this text. Test frequencies and their selection will be examined in detail in this Section.
FREQUENCY SELECTION
In Section 1, we observed that eddy currents are exponentially reduced as they penetrate the test object. We also observed a time or phase difference in these currents. The currents near the test coil
happen first, or lead the current that is deeper in the object. A high current density allows good
detectability, and a wide phase difference between near and far surfaces allows good resolution.
Unfortunately, if a low frequency is selected to provide good penetration and detectability, the
phase difference between near and far surface is reduced.
Selection of frequency often becomes a compromise. It is common practice in in-service inspection
of thin wall, non-ferromagnetic tubing to establish a standard depth of penetration just past the midpoint of the tube wall (17). This permits about 25 percent of the available eddy current to flow at the
outside surface of the tube wall. In addition, this establishes a phase difference of approximately
150 to 170 degrees between the inside and outside surface of the tube wall. The combination of 25
percent outside, or surface current, and 170 degrees included phase angle provides good detectability and resolution for thin wall tube inspection.
The depth of penetration formula discussed in Section 1, although correct, has rather cumbersome
units. Conductivity is usually expressed in percent of the "International Annealed Copper Standard"
(% lACS). Resistivity is usually expressed in terms of micro-ohm-centimeter {J.tOcm) (9). Depths of
penetration are normally much less than 0.5 inch. A formula using these units may be more appropriate and easier to use.
A depth of penetration formula using resistivity, frequency, and permeability can be expressed as
follows:
where:
0
K
Q
f
It rei
=
=
=
=
=
31
For non-ferromagnetic materials the term JLrel is ignored. The equation for non-ferromagnetic materials then becomes:
o=K~
As technicians and engineers, our prime variable is frequency. By adjusting frequency we can be
selectively responsive to test object variables. Solving the non-ferromagnetic depth of penetration
formula for frequency requires a simple algebraic manipulation as follows:
(a)
(b)
(c)
=K~
0
0
Vf
K
02
K2
(d)
K2
02
(e)
K2P
02
f
-Q
= for f =
(1.98)2 e
02
As an example of how this may be used consider inspecting an aluminum plate 0.3 inch thick,
fastened to a steel plate at the far surface. Effects of the steel part are undesirable and require discrimination or elimination. The aluminum plate has a resistivity of 5 micro-ohm-em. By establishing
a depth of penetration at 0.1 inch, the far surface current will be less than 10 percent of the available
current, thus reducing response to the steel part. The frequency required for this can be calculated
by applying:
f
(1.98)2(5)
0.1 2
1960 hertz
19.6
0.01
If detection of the presence of the steel part was required, the depth of penetration could be reestablished at 0.3 inch in the aluminum plate, and a new frequency could be calculated.
=
=
19.6
(0.3) 2
19.6
0.09
218 hertz
Another approach to frequency selection uses argument "A" of the Bessel function (5) where argument "A" is equal to unity or 1.
A
fJLre1ad
5066
where:
f
= Frequency in hertz
d
JLrel
Conductivity meter/ohm-mm 2
= Diameter of test object, em
= Relative permeability
32
A frequency can always be selected to establish factor "A" equal to 1. This frequency is known as
the limit frequency and is noted by the term f 9 . By substituting 1 for factor "A" and f for f, the equa9
tion becomes:
or
Limit frequency (f 9) is then established in terms of conductivity, permeability dimension, and a constant (5066).
Since limit frequency is based on these parameters, a method of frequency determination using a
test frequency to limit frequency ratio f/f 9 can be accomplished. High f/f 9 ratios are used for near surface tests, and lower f/f 9 ratios are used for subsurface tests.
Often results of such tests are represented graphically by diagrams. These diagrams are called impedance diagrams (4). Impedance illustrated by vector diagrams in Section 3 shows inductive reactance represented on the ordinate axis and resistance on the axis of abscissa.
The vector sum of the reactive and resistive components is impedance. This impedance is a quantity
with magnitude and direction that is directly proportional to frequency. In order to construct a universal impedance diagram valid for all frequencies, the impedance must be normalized (4). Figure
5.1 illustrates a normalization process.
E
X
......
'
....
u
<(
,_
<(
....
"'
1.0
......
<(
"'
Rl
RES I STANCE - R
RES I STANCE - R
(b)
(a)
Figure 5.1-Effect of Frequency Change: (a) Primary Impedance Without Secondary Circuit; (b) Primary Impedance with Secondary Circuit (Reprinted with permission from Hugo L. Libby, Introduction to
Electromagnetic Nondestructive Test Methods, p. 37. Copyright1971, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
Figure 5.1 a shows the effect on primary impedance Zp with changes in frequency (w
5.1 a represents primary impedance without a secondary circuit or test object.
= 21rf). Figure
Figure 5.1 b illustrates the effect of frequency on primary impedance with a secondary circuit or test
object present. The primary resistance R1 in Figure 5.1a has been subtracted in Figure 5.1b sinceresistance is not affected by frequency. The term wLsG in Figure 5.1 b represents a reference quantity
for the secondary impedance. The units are secondary conductance G and wL 5 secondary reactance.
33
Further normalization is accomplished by dividing the reactive and resistive components by the
term wl 0 or the primary inductive reactance without a secondary circuit present.
Figure 5.2 shows a typical normalized impedance diagram (19).
1.1
0.2
10
-...:;
~
~
1.2
09
~06
'~C\
18\
08
ho,Jw"OI
2~
"'0.7
22 \
:;:
:X:
SOLID CYLINDRICAL
..J
BAR~
1\ce v
06
2.6
UJ
...u
<t
<t
UJ
a: 0 5
w
>
>=
u
I
I.O'JwL 0 G
:1
2
:::>
Cl
3.4
3.6
04
3.8/
03
v !
,v
/
0.2
01
THINWALL TUBE
cz
25
~
01
1/.
vr
0.2
03
04
j,
1.4
05
0.6
0.7
0.8
Figure 5.2-Normalized Impedance Diagram for a long coil encircling a solid cylindrical non-ferromagnetic bar,
showing also the locus for a thin-wall tube. (k = electromagnetic-wave propagation constant for a
conducting material or ..JWf.La; r = radius of conducting cylinder, meters; w = 21rf; f = frequency;
~ := equivalent of .,Jwf.La for simplified electrical circuits; f.L = magnetic permeability
of bar, or = 47r 10" 7 henries/meter if bar is nonmagnetic; a = electrical conductivity of bar,
mhos/meter; 1.0 = coil fill factor.) (ASM Committee on Eddy Current Inspection, "Eddy-Current Inspection," Metals Handbook, Vol. 11, 8th Ed., Howard E. Boyer, Editor, American Society for Metals,
1976, p. 82.)
The terms wl!wlo and R/wlo represent the relative impedance of the test coil as affected by the test
object.
34
Signals generated by changes in wl orR caused by test object conditions such as surface and subsurface discontinuities may be noted by L:lwl or L:lR. The L:lwl 0 and L:lR notation indicates a change in
the impedance.
Figure 5.3 shows the impedance variation in a non-ferromagnetic cylinder caused by surface and
subsurface discontinuities (5).
_f =50
9--+-----1
0.04
0
INSTITUT DR. FOERSTER
Figure 5.3-lmpedance Variations caused by surface and subsurface cracks in non-ferromagnetic cylinders, at
a frequency ratio f/fg = 50 (5, p. 37-21)
Figure 5.3 also illustrates a sensitivity ratio for surface and subsurface discontinuities. Notice with
an f/fg ratio of 50, a relatively high frequency, the response to subsurface discontinuities is not very
pronounced.
35
Figure 5.4 shows responses to the same discontinuities with an f/f 9 ratio of 15. This lower frequency
allows better detection of subsurface discontinuities as shown in Figure 5.4.
0.14
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.02
0
t:.R
0.06(..)Lo
INSTITUT DR. FOERSTER
Figure 5.4-lmpedance Variations caused by surface and subsurface cracks in non-ferromagnetic cylinders, at
a frequency ratio f/f = 15 (5, p. 3720)
9
Multifrequency Systems
It becomes obvious that the technician must have a good working knowledge of current density and
phase relationships in order to make intelligent frequency choices. The frequency choice discussed
to date deals with coil systems driven by only one frequency. Test systems driven by more than one
frequency are called multifrequency or multiparameter systems. It is common for a test coil to be
driven with three or more frequencies. Although several frequencies may be applied simultaneously
or sequentially to a test coil, each of the individual frequencies follows rules established by single
frequency methods. Signals generated at the various frequencies are often combined or mixed in
electronic circuits that algebraically add or subtract signals to obtain a desired result.
36
One multifrequency approach is to apply a broadband signal, with many frequency components, to
the test coil (4). The information transmitted by this signal is proportional to its bandwidth, and the
logarithm of 1 plus the signal-to-noise power ratio. This relationship is stated by the equation:
= W Log
(1
~)
where:
C
W
S
=
=
Another approach to multiparameter methods is to use a multiplexing process (12). The multiplexing
process places one frequency at a time on the test coil. This results in zero cross-talk between frequencies and eliminates the need for bandpass filters. The major advantages of a multiplex system
are (1) lower cost, (2) greater flexibility in frequency selection, and (3) no cross-talk between frequency channels.
If the multiplex switching rate is sufficiently high, both broadband and multiplex systems have
essentially the same results. The characterization of eddy current signals by their phase angle and
amplitude is a common practice and provides a basis for signal mixing to suppress unwanted signals from test data (12). Two frequencies are required to remove each unwanted variable.
Practical multi parameter frequency selection can be demonstrated by the following example:
Problem: Eddy current inspection of installed thin-wall non-ferromagnetic heat exchanger tubing.
Tubing is structurally supported by ferromagnetic tube supports at several locations. It is desired to
remove the tube support response signal from tube wall data.
Solution: Apply a multiparameter technique to suppress tube support signal response.
First, a frequency is selected to give optimum phase and amplitude information about the tube wall.
We shall call this the prime frequency. At the prime frequency, the response to the tube support and
a calibrating through-wall hole are equal in amplitude response.
A second frequency called the subtractor frequency is selected on the basis of tube support
response. Since the tube support surrounds the OD of the tube, a low frequency is selected. At the
subtracter frequency the tube support signal response is approximately 10 times greater than the
calibrating through-wall hole.
If the mixing unit amplitude adjustments are set so that both prime and subtractor tube support
signal amplitudes are equal and phased in a manner to cause signal subtraction, the tube support
signals cancel, leaving only slightly attenuated prime data information. For suppression of inside or
near surface signals, a higher subtractor frequency would be chosen.
A combination of prime, low, and high subtractor frequencies is often used to suppress both near
and far surface signals, leaving only data pertaining to the part thickness and its condition.
Optimization of frequency then depends on the desired measurement or parameter of interest (11,
12, 4).
37
REVIEW QUESTIONS
0.51
What frequency is required to establish one standard depth of penetration of 0.1 inch in Zirconium?
A.
19.6 kHz
B.
196Hz
C. 3.4 kHz
D.
340Hz
0.52
0.53
The frequency required to establish the Bessel function Argument "A" equal to 1 is called
A.
B.
C.
D.
optimum frequency
resonant frequency
limit frequency
penetration frequency
= 50.6 meter/ohm mm
Q.54
0.55
Using the example in Question 5.4, what is the f/f 9 ratio if the test
A.
1.2
B.
120
c. 60
D. 600
0.56
In Figure
A.
B.
C.
D.
1 em in diameter. The
fr~quency
is 60 kHz?
0.5-7
0.5-8
The reference quantity is different for solid cylinder and thin-wall tube in Figure 5.2 because
A,
B.
C.
D.
0.59
the
the
the
the
frequency is different
conductivity is different
skin effect is no longer negligible
thin-wall tube has not been normalized
38
times greater
0.510
When using multifrequency systems, low subtracter frequencies are used to suppress
A.
B.
C.
D.
conductivity changes
far surface signals
near surface signals
permeability changes
39
6.
INSTRUMENT SYSTEMS
Most eddy current instrumentation is categorized by its final output or display mode. There are basic
requirements common to all types of eddy current instrumentation.
Five different elements are usually required to produce a viable eddy current instrument (4). These
functions are excitation, modulation, signal preparation, signal analysis, and signal display. An optional sixth component would be test object handling equipment.
Figure 6.1 illustrates how these components interrelate.
EXCITATION
MODULATION
TEST
OBJECT
SIGNAL
PREPARATION
BALANCE OR
COMPENSATING
NETWORKS
FILTERS
SIGNAL SHAPING
CIRCUITS
DEMODULATION
AND ANALYSIS
DISPLAY OR
INDICATION
RECORDERS
ALARMS
RELAYS
AUTOMATIC
MECHANISMS
T:!~~!~~T ~--------------------------------Figure 6.1-lnternal Functions of the Electromagnetic Nondestructive Test (Reprinted with permission from
Hugo L. Libby, Introduction to Electromagnetic Nondestructive Test Methods, p. 60. Copyright
1971, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
The generator provides excitation signals to the test coil. The signal modulation occurs in the electromagnetic field of the test coil assembly. Next, the signal preparation section, usually a balancing
network, prepares the signal for demodulation and analysis. In the signal preparation stage, balance
networks are used to "null" out steady-value alternating current signals. Amplifiers and filters are
also part of this section to improve signal-to-noise ratio and raise signal levels for the subsequent
demodulation and analysis stage.
The demodulation and analysis section is made up of detectors, analyzers, discriminators, filters,
and sampling circuits. Detectors can be a simple amplitude type or a more sophisticated phase/
amplitude or coherent type.
The signal display section is the key link between the test equipment and its intended purpose. The
signal can be displayed many different ways. Common displays include cathode ray tube (CRT)
oscilloscopes, meters, recorders, visual or audible alarms, computer terminals, and automatic signalling or reject equipment.
40
A series of simple eddy current instruments is shown in Figure 6.2 a, b, c, and d (19).
GROUND (a)
GROUND
(a)
GROUND (c)
GROUND
(b)
GROUND
(c)
GROUND (d)
GROUND
SAMPLE
(d)
Figure 6.2-Four Types of Simple Eddy Current Instruments (ASM Committee on Eddy Current Inspection,
"Eddy-Current Inspection," Metals Handbook, Vol 11, 8th Ed., Howard E. Boyer, Editor, American
Society for Metals, 1976, p. 86.)
In Figure 6.2a, the voltage across the inspection coil is monitored by an ac voltmeter. This type of instrument could be used to measure large lift-off variations where accuracy was not critical. Figure
6.2b shows an impedance bridge circuit. This instrument consists of an ac exciting source, dropping
resistors, and a balancing impedance.
Figure 6.2c is similar to Figure 6.2b. In Figure 6.2c a balance coil similar to the inspection coil is
used to provide a balanced bridge. Figure 6.2d illustrates a balancing coil affected by a reference
sample. This is commonly used in external reference differential coil tests. In all cases, since only
the voltage change or magnitude is monitored, these systems can all be grouped as impedance
magnitude types (5).
Eddy current testing can be divided into three broad groups (2). The groups are impedance testing,
phase analysis testing, and modulation analysis testing. Impedance testing is based on gross
changes in coil impedance when the coil is placed near the test object. Phase analysis testing is
based on phase changes occurring in the test coil and the test object's effect on those phase
changes. Modulation analysis testing depends on the test object passing through the test coil's
magnetic field at a constant rate. The amount of frequency modulation observed as a discontinuity
passes through the test coil's field and is a function of the transit time of the discontinuity through
the coil's field. The faster the transit time, the greater the modulation.
IMPEDANCE TESTING
With impedance magnitude instrumentation it is often difficult to separate desired responses, such
as changes in conductivity or permeability, from dimensional changes. A variation of the impedance
magnitude technique is the reactance magnitude instrument (5). In reactance magnitude tests, the
test coil is part of the fundamental frequency oscillator circuit. This operates like a tuned circuit
where the oscillator frequency is determined by the test coil's inductive reactance. As the test coil is
affected by the test object, its inductive reactance changes, which in turn changes the oscillator frequency. The relative frequency variation ~flf is, therefore, an indication of test object condition.
Reactance magnitude systems have many of the same limitations as impedance magnitude
systems (5).
41
Phase analysis techniques are divided into many subgroups depending on the type of data display.
Some of the various types are vector point, impedance plane, ellipse, and linear time base (2). The
vector point circuit and display are illustrated in Figure 6.3.
Vector Point
TO HERE
FROM HERE
CONDUCTIVITY
HORIZONTAL
"A"
FROM HERE
TO HERE
DIMENSIONAL CHG
VERTICAL
"B"
STANDARD
REFERENCE
PROCESSING
CIRCUITS
GENERATOR
TEST
ARTICLE'
270.
CRT
V,
"' D
" = PERMEABILITY
DIMENSION
- - -)1
a = CONDUCTIVITY
/I
/
//
/
VOLTAGE PLANE
42
X
V,
POINT
OF
LIGHT
The vector point display is a point of light on a CRT. The point is the vector sum of theY and X axis
voltages present in the test coil (2). By proper selection of frequency and phase adjustment, voltage
V1 could represent dimensional changes and voltage V2 could represent changes in conductivity.
Ellipse
The ellipse method is shown in Figure 6.4 .
s. .__
RE-F-ER_E_N_CE_s_T_A_ND_A_R_D_
-~71.~
PROCESSING
CIRCUITS
GENERATOR
~~-TE-STA-RT-ICLE-----~~'l~
PHASE
SHIFTER
As with the vector point method, the test object and reference standard are used to provide a balanced output. A normal balanced output is a straight horizontal line. Figure 6.5 shows typical ellipse
responses (2).
DIMENSION
SMALL CHANGE
LARGE CHANGE
SMALL CHANGE
LARGE CHANGE
SMALL CHANGE
LARGE CHANGE
CONDUCTIVITY
BOTH DIMENSION
AND CONDUCTIVITY
Figure 6.5-CRT Displays for Dimension and Conductivity (2, p. 3-17) Reprinted with permission.
43
With the ellipse method the vertical deflection plates of a CRT are energized by an amplified voltage
from the secondary test coils (5). The horizontal deflection plates are energized by a voltage that corresponds to the primary magnetizing current. With this arrangement, an ellipse opening occurs
when a discontinuity signal is perpendicular to a dimensional variation in the impedance plane.
The ellipse method can be used to examine many test object variables such as conductivity, permeability, hardness, dimensions, and discontinuities. When testing ferromagnetic parts with the
ellipse and vector point methods, the relative permeability of the part will vary due to the nonlinear
magnetization of the magnetizing field. This nonlinear magnetization creates odd harmonic frequencies to appear in the output data (5).
The linear time base unit applies a sawtooth shaped voltage to the horizontal deflection plates of a
CRT. This provides a linear trace of the CRT beam from left to right across the CRT screen. The linear
trace is timed so that it is equal to one cycle of the magnetizing current. This allows one cycle of the
magnetizing sine wave voltage to appear on the CRT. Figure 6.7 illustrates a linear time base
display.
SLIT
Figure 6.7-Screen Image of a Linear Time Base Instrument with Sinusoidal Signals (5, p. 40-31)
44
A slit or narrow vertical scale is provided to measure the amplitude of signals present in the slit (5).
The base voltage is normally adjusted to cross the slit at "0" volts, the 180 point on the sine wave.
The slit value "M" is used to analyze results. The slit value "M" is described by the equation:
M =A sine
where:
M
A
e
= Slit value
= Amplitude of the measurement in the slit
= Angle between base signal and measurement effect
Test instruments may also be classified by mode of operation (4). The mode of operation is determined by two functional areas within the instrument type.
The first consideration is the method of test coil excitation. The second area is the degree of compensation, or nulling, and the type of detector used.
The types of excitation include single frequency or multifrequency sinusoidal, single or repetitive
pulse, and swept frequency.
Compensation and detection can be accomplished by three modes. The three main input-detector
modes are:
1.
2.
3.
Mode 1 responds to any signal irrespective of phase angle. Mode 2, using amplitude-phase detectors, can discriminate against signals having a particular phase angle. With this system, the total
demodulated signal can be displayed on an X-Y oscilloscope to show amplitude and phase relationships. Figure 6.8a shows a commercial null balance instrument with amplitude phase detectors.
45
5 50%
ID
3 75%
OD
Figure 6.8b-Typical Response to a Thin Wall Non-ferromagnetic Tube Calibration Standard (Zetec, Inc.)
Mode 3 is a phase-sensitive system although it has only amplitude detectors. It achieves phase sensitivity by operating at a selected off-balance condition. This off-null signal is very large compared
with test object variations. Under this condition, the amplitude detector output varies in accordance
with the test object signal variation on the large off-null signal. Two off-null systems are required to
present both components of the test coil output signal.
Figure 6.9 shows a block diagram of a stepped single frequency phase-amplitude instrument (4).
TEST OBJECT
I
L...----'1
I
I .-----
L~
I,_,
___
__.I
Figure 6.9-lnstrument Providing Any One of Four Operating Frequencies (Reprinted with permission from
Hugo L. Libby, Introduction to Electromagnetic Nondestructive Test Methods, p. 65. Copyright
1971, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
46
The circuit in Figure 6.9 is capable of operating at any of the four frequencies. If the four frequencies
are over a wide range, several different test coils may be required to use the instrument over the entire range. Most modern single frequency instruments use this principle; however, the four individual
generators are usually replaced by one variable frequency generator with a wide operating range. A
typical frequency range for such an instrument is 100 Hz to several megahertz.
Figure 6.10 shows a block diagram for a multifrequency instrument operating at three frequencies
simultaneously.
J_
!GENERATOR
lGENERATOR_r=
GENERATORe
----,
TEST OBJECT
COMPENSATION
FILTERS AND
OR BALANCE f - - AMPLIFIERS
CIRCUITS
MULTIPLE
AMPLITUDE
PHASE
DETECTORS
ANALYZERS
I III
MULTIPLE
READ-OUTS
Figure 6.10-Multifrequency Instrument Operating at Three Frequencies Simultaneously (Reprinted with permission from Hugo L. Libby, Introduction to Electromagnetic Nondestructive Test Methods, p. 65.
Copyright 1971, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
In Figure 6.10, excitation currents at each frequency are impressed on the coil at the same time.
Multiple circuits are used throughout the instrument (4). The test coil output carrier frequencies are
separated by filters. Multiple dual phase amplitude detectors are used and their outputs summed to
provide separation of several test object parameters. A system similar to this is described in "InService Inspection of Steam Generator Tubing Using Multiple Frequency Eddy Current Techniques"
(12).
Another approach to the multifrequency technique uses a sequential coil drive called multiplexing
(12). The frequencies are changed by a step-by-step sequence with such rapidity that the test parameters remain unchanged. The multiplex technique has the advantages of lower cost, continuously
variable frequencies, and little or no cross-talk between channels.
47
Figure 6.11 illustrates a commercial multifrequency instrument capable of operating at four different frequencies sequentially. Each of the frequency modules may be adjusted over a wide range
of frequencies. In addition, two mixing modules are used to combine output signals of the various
channels for suppression of unwanted variables. Results of such suppression are described in
"Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Method and the Separation of Test Specimen Variables" (12) .
Other instruments being developed will be microprocessor based with the ability to excite several
coils at several frequencies. This would allow automatic suppression of unwanted variables and a
direct link to larger computers for computer enhancement of test signal information.
A test system using pulsed excitation is shown in Figure 6.13 (4).
Figure 6.13-Pulsed Waveform Excitation (Reprinted with permission from Hugo L. Libby, Introduction to Electromagnetic Nondestructive Test Methods, p. 66. Copyright 1971, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)
A pulse is applied to the test coil, compensating networks, and analyzers simultaneously. Systems
having analyzers with one or two sampling points perform similar to a single frequency tester using
sinusoidal excitation.
Pulsed eddy current systems (7) having multiple sampling points perform more like the multifrequency tester shown in Figure 6.10.
TEST OBJECT HANDLING EQUIPMENT
Test object handling equipment is often a necessary component of a test system (4). Bars and tubes
can be fed through encircling coils by means of roller fed assemblies. The stock being fed through
the coil is usually transported at a constant speed. The transport speed is selected with instrument
response and reject system response being of prime importance to the test. Pen marking and automatic sorting devices are common in automated systems. Spinning probes are used where the
probe is rotated and the tube or bar is translated. Probe rotational speeds must be compatible with
instrument response and translation speeds in order to obtain the desired inspection coverage and
results.
Small parts are often gravity fed through coil assemblies. A major problem with small parts is loading, inspecting, and unloading. A speed effect (4) occurs when a conducting object is passed
through a coil. As the object moves through the coil's magnetic field, an additional induced voltage
within the object occurs. This additional induced voltage has the same frequency as the exciting
current, and it causes a current flow and associated magnetic fields that produce signals proportional to the speed of the object through the coil.
For larger or stationary structures, test probes are scanned over the part surface by manual or remotely operated systems. Scanning considerations are the same as for tube and bar stock: instrument response, marking or reject system response, and desired coverage. In the case of large heat
exchangers, a probe positioning device is used to position the test probe over each tube opening to
be inspected. Tubes to be inspected are identified by manual templates, or their coordinates are programmed into computer memory. Positive feedback is supplied to computer positioning systems by
encoder devices. In manual template systems the tube end is viewed by a video camera. Tube identification and control feedback are supplied to the operator via a video display system.
In each system, as the probe guide is positioned correctly, the probe is inserted and withdrawn from
the heat exchanger tube bore, and results of the scan are recorded on chart paper and magnetic
tape.
49
REVIEW QUESTIONS
Q.61
0.62
0.63
When only coil voltage is monitored, the system is considered a(an) _ _ _ _ _ type system.
A.
impedance magnitude
B.
phase analysis
C.
reactance magnitude
D.
resistance magnitude
0.6-4
Q.65
0.6-6
0.6-7
Using the vector point method, undesired responses appear _ _ _ _ _ on the CRT.
A.
vertical
B.
horizontal
C.
at 45 o to horizontal
D.
random and cannot be set
0.68
When ellipse testing a rod, the f/f 9 ratio is lowered from 50 to 5 percent. The response from a 5
percent surface flaw:
A.
will appear more elliptical.
B.
will appear less elliptical.
C.
is unchanged.
D.
rotates 90 clockwise.
0.6-9
0.6-10
Calculate the slit value "M" for a signal phase shift of 45 degrees at 10 divisions vertical
amplitude.
A.
14
B.
D.
0.7
1.4
c.
50
0.611
A multifrequency instrument that excites the test coil with several frequencies simultaneously
uses the
concept.
A.
multiplex
B.
time share
C.
broadband
D.
synthesized
0.612
A multifrequency instrument that excites the test coil with several frequencies sequentially
usesthe
concept.
A.
multiplex
B.
time base
C.
broadband
D.
Cartesian
0.613
In a pulsed eddy current system using a short duration and a long duration pulse, the short
duration pulse is used to reduce _ _ _ __
A.
edge effect
B.
skin effect
C.
Iift-off effect
D.
conductivity variations
0.6-14
When selecting feed rates for automatic inspection of tube and bar stock, consideration is
given to:
A.
instrument response.
B.
automatic sorting response.
C.
speed effect.
D.
all of the above.
51
7.
READOUT MECHANISMS
Eddy current test data may be displayed or indicated in a variety of ways. The type of display or readout depends on the test requirements (4). Test records may require archive storage on large inservice components so that corrosion or discontinuity rates of change can be monitored and projected. In some production tests, a simple GO/NO-GO indicator circuit is all that is required.
Some common readout mechanisms are indicator lights, audio alarms, meters, digital displays,
cathode ray tubes, recorders, and computer printout or displays.
INDICATOR LIGHTS
A simple use of the indicator light is to monitor the eddy current signal amplitude with an amplitude
gate circuit. When the signal reaches a preset amplitude limit, the amplitude gate switches a relay
that applies power to an indicator light or automatic sorting device. With the amplitude gate circuit,
high-low limits could be preset to give GO/NO-GO indications.
AUDIO ALARMS
Audio alarms can be used in much the same manner. Usually the audio alarm indicates only the abnormal condition. Alarm lights and audio alarms are commonly incorporated in eddy current test
equipment. The indicator light and audio alarm give only qualitative information about the item,
whether a condition is present or not. The degree of condition cannot normally be determined with
these devices. Indicator lights and audio alarms are relatively inexpensive and can be interpreted by
semiskilled personnel.
METERS
Meters can present quantitative information about a test object. Meters operate on the D'Arsonval
galvanometer principle. The principle is based on the action between two magnetic fields. A common meter uses a strong permanent magnet to produce one magnetic field; the other magnetic field
is produced by a movable coil wound on a core. The coil and core are suspended on jewelled bearings and attached to a pointer or "needle." The instrument output current is passed through the coil
and produces a magnetic field about the coil that reacts to the permanent magnetic field surrounding the assembly. The measuring coil is deflected, moving the meter pointer. The degree of pointer
movement can be related to test object variables as presented by the tester output signals.
DIGITAL DISPLAYS
Numerical digital displays or indicators provide the same type of information as analog meter
systems. Many eddy current instruments have analog output circuits.
Data handling (7) of analog information in digital form requires analog information to be processed
through analog-to-digital (A-D) converters. The A-D converter transforms analog voltages to numerical values for display.
52
CRTs
Cathode ray tubes (CRTs) play.an important role in the display of eddy current information. Most
CRTs are the "electrostatic" type. Three main elements comprise a cathode ray tube: (1) electron
gun, (2) deflection plates, and (3) a fluorescent screen. The electron gun generates, focuses, and
directs the electron beam toward the face or screen of the CRT. The deflection plates are situated
between the electron gun and the screen. They are arranged in two pairs, usually called horizontal
and vertical, or X and Y. The plane of one pair is perpendicular to the other pair and therefore considered X and Y.
The screen is the imaging portion of the CRT. The screen consists of a coating or coatings that produce photochemical reactions when struck by the electron beam. The photochemical action appears in two stages. Fluorescence occurs as the electron beam strikes the screen. Phosphorescence
enables the screen to continue to give off light after the electron beam has been removed
or has passed over a section of the screen. All screen materials possess both fluorescence and
phosphorescence. Screen materials are referred to as phosphors. The color of fluorescence and
phosphorescence may differ as the case for zinc sulfide: the fluorescence is blue-green, and the
phosphorescence is yellow-green. Fluorescence may appear blue, white, red, yellow, green, orange,
or a combination of colors, depending on the chemical makeup of the screen. The amount of light
output from the fluorescent screen depends on the electron beam accelerating potential, screen
chemical composition, thickness of screen material, and writing speed of the electron beam.
The duration of the photochemical effect is called persistance. Persistance is grouped as to low,
medium, or high persistance. To display repetitive signals, a low or medium persistance CRT may be
used. To display nonrecurrent or single events, a high persistance CRT should be used. Many
modern CRTs have the capability of both low or medium and high persistance. Storage or memory
CATs have the ability to display nonrecurrent signals. The image from a single event may remain
visible on the CRT for many hours, if desired.
Figure 7.1 illustrates a typical eddy current signal response on a storage CRT.
The amplitude of the signal in Figure 7.1 is an indicator of the volume of the discontinuity. The phase
angle with respect to the X axis represents discontinuity depth and origin, origin indicating whether
the discontinuity originated on the inside or outside surface of the tube (13).
53
RECORDERS
Recorders are also used to display data and to provide a convenient method of data storage. Recording is accomplished on paper strip charts, facsimile paper, facsimile photosensitive, magnetic tape
(AM, FM, or video), or digital memory disks.
Strip chart recordings are common in testing tubing or nuclear fuel rods where the discontinuity's
location down the length of rod or tube is critical. The strip chart length is indexed to time or
distance and pen response indicates normal or abnormal conditions.
~~Nif~iti'ty
'
..
""::!:'>. ,,
:,:::J;
. ~~.\',..
,_.,:::~:
=:;;
'
....:1
..
..
''
Fascimile recording (12) is a technique of displaying data signals as a raster of lines which have
varying levels of blackness which correspond to data-signal voltage changes. Facsimile recording is
commonly referred to as C-scan recording. If no data is transmitted to the facsimile recorder, a
uniform light or dark (depending on preference) line or series of lines (raster) would be recorded. In
the case of light rasters, the incoming data signal would produce areas of different darkness. The
darkness would be dependent on the incoming data signal. Facsimile recorders are used in conjunction with scanning mechanisms and scan rates, and locations are synchronized with the facsimile
recorder to present an image of the object variances. Figure 7.3 illustrates a typical facsimile recording.
54
f'"'i
. ;:-07'
.
',
...,.
Figure 7.3-Facsimile Recording of Saw-cut Specimen (Copyright, American Society for Testing and Materials,
1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, PA. 19103. Reprinted, with permission.)
Another common type recorder is the X-Y recorder. X-Y recorders are usually used to present scanning type data. In X-Y systems, only data signals are printed; no raster is produced in a conventional
X-Y recorder system.
Magnetic tape recorders, usually frequency-modulated multichannel types, are used to provide a
permanent record of test results. In the case of eddy current equipment with X-Y outputs, quadrature
information is recorded and played back into analyzers tor post inspection analysis (13).
COMPUTERS
Computers may be used to control data acquisition and analysis processes. Data handling techniques (7) take a wide variety of approaches. Dodd and Deeds (12) describe a computer-controlled
multifrequency system. Figure 7.4 shows a computer-controlled eddy current system.
Figure 7.4-Computer-controlled Eddy Current System (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, No. 1747-49)
55
REVIEW QUESTIONS
Q.71
Q.72
Q.73
Q.74
Q.7-5
Q.7-6
Q.77
Q.78
High persistance CRT screens are normally used for repetitive signal display.
A. True
B.
False
Q.79
Q.710
A series
A.
B.
C.
D.
56
8.
APPLICATIONS
Electromagnetic induction and the eddy current principle can be affected in many different ways.
These effects may be grouped by discontinuity detection, measurement of material properties,
dimensional measurements, and other special applications (4).
With discontinuity, or the flaw detection group, we are concerned with locating cracks, corrosion,
erosion, and mechanical damage. The material properties group includes measurements of conductivity, permeability, hardness, alloy sorting or chemical composition, and degree of heat treatment.
Dimensional measurements commonly made are thickness, profilometry, spacing or location, and
coating or cladding thickness.
Special applications include measurements of temperature, flow metering of liquid metals, sonic vibrations, and anisotropic conditions.
FLAW DETECTION
The theoretical response to discontinuities has been discussed in previous Sections of this guide. In
this Section, some actual practice examples are given to enhance the understanding of applied
theory.
A problem common to the chemical and electric power industries is the corrosion of heat exchanger
tubing. This tubing is installed in large vessels in a high density array. It is not uncommon for a
4-foot diameter heat exchanger to contain 3000 tubes. This high density and limited access to the inspection areas often preclude the use of other NDE methods.
Heat exchanger inspection systems and results are described by Denton (13), Wehrmeister (13), Libby (8), Dodd, Sagar, and Davis (12).
In most of these cases, the severity of the discontinuity is determined by analyzing the eddy current
signal phase and amplitude. The signal amplitude is an indicator of the discontinuity volume. The
phase angle determines the depth of the discontinuity and also the originating surface (ID or OD) of
that discontinuity. (See Figure 6.8, pp. 45-46.)
Phase angle and amplitude relationships are usually established by using a reference standard with
artificial discontinuities of known and documented values.
The geometry of real discontinuities may differ from reference standard discontinuities. This difference produces interpretation errors as discussed by Sagar (12). Placement of real discontinuities
near tube support members causing a complex coil impedance change is also a source of error.
This, of course, is dependent upon the size of the discontinuity and its resultant eddy current signal
in relation to the tube support signal. This follows the basic principle of signal-to-noise ratio.
The signal-to-noise ratio can be improved at tube-to-tube support intersections by the use of multifrequency techniques (12, 11). In multifrequency applications, an optimum frequency is chosen for
response to the tube wall and a lower than optimum frequency is chosen for response to the tube
support. The two signals are processed through comparator circuits called mixers where the tube
support response is subtracted from the tube wall response signal, leaving only the response to the
tube wall discontinuity.
Another industry that uses eddy current testing extensively is the aircraft industry. Many eddy current examinations are conducted on gas turbine engines and airframe structures. A common problem with gas turbines is fatigue cracking of the compressor or exhaust turbine blade roots (13).
57
usually these inspections are performed with portable instruments with meter response capability.
The meter response is compared to the response of known discontinuities in a reference specimen.
A determination is then made of the part's acceptance.
The reference specimen and its associated discontinuities are very critical to the success of the
test. Often models are constructed with artificial discontinuities that are exact duplicates of the
item being inspected.
The low frequency eddy current inspection of aircraft structures is explained by D.J. Hagemaier(14).
The low frequency (100-1000 Hz) technique is used to locate cracks in thick or multiple layer, bolted
or riveted aircraft structures. Again, models are constructed with artificial cracks, and their
responses are compared to responses in the actual test object. Pulsed eddy current systems also
are used for crack detection in thick structures.
DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENTS
Dimensional measurements, such as thickness, shape, and position, or proximity of one item to
another, are important uses of the eddy current technique.
Often materials are clad with other materials to present a resistance to chemical attack or to provide
wear resistance. Cladding or plating thickness then becomes an important variable to the serviceability of the unit (6).
For nonconductive coatings on conductive bases, the "probe-to-specimen spacing" (6), or lift-off
technique can be applied.
The case of conductive plating or cladding on conductive bases requires more refinement. The
thickness loci respond in a complex manner on the impedance plane (4). The loci for multilayered
objects with each layer consisting of a material with a different conductivity follow a spiral pattern.
In certain cases, two frequency or multifrequency systems (6) are used to stabilize results or minimize lift-off variations on the thickness measurement.
The depth of case hardening can be determined by measuring the nitride case thickness in stainless
steel (11). The nitride case thickness produces magnetic permeability variations. The thicker the
nitride, the greater the permeability. The coil's inductive reactance increases with a permeability increase. This variable is carefully monitored and correlated to actual metallographic results.
Eddy current profilometry is another common way to measure dimensions; for example, the measurement of inside diameters of tubes. using a lift-off technique (11). For this measurement, several
small probe coils are mounted radially in a coil form. The coil form is inserted into the tube and each
coil's proximity to the tube wall is monitored. The resultant output of each coil can provide information about the concentricity of the tube.
An obvious problem encountered with this method is centering of the coil holder assembly. The center of the coil holder must be near the center of the tube. When inspecting for localized dimensional
changes, a long coil holder is effective in maintaining proper centering. Another function of the long
coil form is to keep the coils from becoming "cocked" or tilted in the tube.
CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENTS
Conductivity is an important measured variable. In the aircraft industry, aluminum is used extensively. Aluminum conductivity varies not only with alloy but also with hardness and tensile strength.
Eddy current instruments scaled in %lACS are normally used to inspect for conductivity variations.
Secondary conductivity standards (12) are commonly used to check instrument calibration. Common secondary conductivity standards range from 8% lACS to approximately 100% lACS. The
58
secondary standards are usually certified accurate within 0.35 percent or 1 percent of value,
whichever is less. Temperature is an important variable when making conductivity measurements.
Most instruments and standards are certified at 20C. Primary conductivity standards are maintained at a constant temperature by oil bath systems.
Primary standards are measured by precision Maxwell bridge type instruments. This circuit increases measurement accuracy and minimizes frequency dependence of the measurement (12).
HARDNESS MEASUREMENTS
Hardness of steel parts is often measured with low frequency comparator bridge instruments (19).
The reference and test coil are balanced with sample parts of known hardness. As parts of unknown
hardness affect the test coil, the instrument output varies. The amount of output variation depends
upon the degree of imbalance created by the unknown test object hardness.
Signal output is then correlated to test object hardness by comparing to known hardness samples of
the same geometry. For example, if a cathode ray tube were used to display hardness information,
the "balance" hardness could be adjusted to center screen, lower hardness values could appear
below center, and higher hardness values could appear above center on the CRT.
ALLOY SORTING
Alloy sorting can be accomplished in the same comparator bridge manner as hardness. A major consideration in both cases is the selection of correct and accurate reference specimens. Since most
eddy current instruments respond to a wide range of variables, the reference SPcecimen parameters
must be controlled carefully.
Test object and reference specimens must be the same or very similar in the following characteristics:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
geometry,
heat treatment,
surface finish,
residual stresses, and
metallurgical structure.
In addition, it is advisable to have more than one reference specimen for backup in case of loss or
damage. In the case of steel parts, they should be completely demagnetized to remove the effects of
residual magnetism on instrument readings. As in most comparative tests, temperature of specimen
and test object should be the same or compensated.
Many other measurements can be made using eddy current techniques. The electromagnetic technique produces so much information about a material, its application is only limited by our ability to
decipher this information (13).
REVIEW QUESTIONS
0.81
0.8-2
Using an ID coil on tubing and applying the phase/amplitude method of inspection, a signal appearing at 90 o on a CRT would be caused by:
A.
ID flaw.
B.
OD flaw.
C.
dent.
D.
bulge.
59
0.83
Discontinuities in heat exchangers at tube support locations are easier to detect because the
support plate concentrates the electromagnetic field at that point.
A. True
B. False
0.84
Using multifrequency techniques on installed heat exchanger tubing, a tube support plate
signal can be suppressed by adding a
frequency signal to the optimum frequency
signal.
A. low
B. high
C. A orB
D. none of the above
0.85
0.86
0.87
0.88
0.89
0.810
Residual stresses in the test part produce such a small effect that they are usually ignored
when selecting reference specimens.
A. True
B.
False
60
9.
ASTM
Standards or Standard Practices, ASTM, usually include in the written instructions headings such
as scope, references, method, significance, definitions, apparatus, calibration standards, calibration, and procedure. The Scope heading makes a general statement about the document's applicability and intent. The Applicable Document heading refers to other publications used as references
for the standard. Method is usually a summary of how the test method is applied to the test object
and what type of measurements can be made. Under the Significance heading is a more detailed discussion of test results and probable causes of indications expected during the examination. The
Definition section usually contains definitions of key words or key phrases associated with the inspection. Apparatus describes the general requirements for the inspection system including instrumentation, coils, positioning, and driving mechanisms. Under Calibration Standards the fabrication
requirements for artificial discontinuity calibration standards are discussed. Included is usually a
discussion of the reference specimen and the geometrical requirements of the artificial discontinuities in it. The Calibration section provides instructions for adjustment and standardization of the
apparatus used for the examination. The response to known discontinuities is usually described in
this section. Under the Procedure heading, detailed instructions are given to implement the inspection. These instructions usually include acceptance limits and how to handle components that are
not acceptable.
The ASTM publishes several standards pertaining to the eddy current method. These standards are
numbered; for example, E268-81. "E268" refers to the standard, and "81" refers to the year of origin
or the year of last revision.
Some ASTM standards that pertain to the eddy current method are as follows:
E 309-77
E 571-82
E 703-79
E 426-76 (1981) Elecromagnetic (Eddy-Current) Testing of Seamless and Welded Tubular Products,
Austenitic Stainless Steel and Similar Alloys
E 24380E 1 Electromagnetic (Eddy-Current) Testing of Seamless Copper and Copper Alloy Tubes
E 566-82
61
MIL-STD
The United States Military uses the Military Standard docufTient to control testing and materials.
Standard procedures are provided by a series of MIL-STD-XXXXX documents. Special requirements
are specified by the Military Specification system. For example, MIL-STD-1537A refers to "Electrical
Conductivity Test for Measurement of Heat Treatment of Aluminum Alloys, Eddy Current Method."
The "Calibration System Requirements" for MIL-STD-1537A are contained in Military Specification
MIL-C-45662.
The MIL-STD usually contains several parts and is very descriptive. These parts normally include
Scope, Applicable Documents, Definitions, General Requirements, Detail Requirements, and Notes.
The Scope contains a general statement of applicability and intent of the Standard. Applicable
Documents pertains to other reference or controlling documents such as other MIL-STD, Military
Specification, or ASTM publications. The Definition part contains precise definitions of key words
and phrases used in the Standard. Under General Requirements, equipment, reference specimen,
and personnel requirements are described in sufficient detail to implement the Standard. Included
in this part is instrument sensitivity and response, test object variables, reference specimen requirements, and personnel qualification requirements. The Detail Requirements part describes the
specific procedure to implement the Standard. The Notes part contains pertinent statements about
the process and guidelines for reporting of results.
ASME
In 1911 the American Society of Mechanical Engineers set up a committee to establish rules of safety for design, fabrication, and inspection of boilers and pressure vessels. These rules have become
known throughout industry as the ASME Code. The committee designated as ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee is a very large group of people from industry and the scientific community.
The "Committee" has many subcommittees, groups, subgroups, and working groups. Currently,
there are approximately 3 committees, 15 subcommittees, 50 subgroups, and 37 working groups.
Each subcommittee, subgroup, and working group combines as a unit for a specific area of interest.
For example, the Subcommittee on Pressure Vessels (SCVIII) has three working groups and four subgroups reporting to it. The purpose of these groups is to interface with industry to keep pace with
changing requirements and needs of industry and public safety.
The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code is divided into eleven sections. ASME Section V is
"Nondestructive Examination." Section Vis divided into two subsections, "A" and "B". Subsection
"A" deals with "Nondestructive Methods of Examination." Article 8 is "Eddy Current Examination of
Tubular Products." Subsection "B" contains "Documents Adopted by Section V."
Eddy current standards are described in Article 26. In this case, the ASTM E215 document has been
adopted by the ASME and reassigned the designation "SE215."
ASME Section V Article 8- Appendix I gives detailed procedure requirements for "Eddy Current Examination Method for Installed Non-ferromagnetic Steam Generator Heat Exchanger Tubing." A procedure designed to meet this requirement can be illustrated by the following example, Document
QA 3.
62
Procedure No. QA 3
11-1
A.
PURPOSE
This procedure describes the equipment and methods as well as the personnel qualifications to be
utilized for the performance of the eddy current examination of steam generator tubes, and meets
the requirements of the N.R.C. Regulatory Guide 1.83, ASME Section XI Appendix IV, and ASME Section V Article 8 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.
B.
SCOPE
The scope of the examination to be performed is contained in the eddy current inspection program
document applicable to the specific plant to be inspected.
C.
PREREQUISITES
1.
Plant Condition
The plant must be shut down with the primary system drained. The steam generators shall be
open on the primary side for access to the channel head and the shell cool-down sequence
shall be complete. Air movers shall be attached to circulate air through the generator to dry the
tube sheet.
2.
Equipment
The examinations shall be performed utilizing an XXXX/XX eddy current instrument with bobbin
coil probes designed for testing from the inside of the tubes. The inspection performance shall
be monitored by the use of the oscilloscope with a phase sensitive vector display and recorded
for later evaluation on both magnetic tape and strip chart.
a.
Procedure No. QA 3
112
ft.
b.
c.
3.
Circumferential groove 20% deep by 1/16" long by 360 degrees on the inside
tube wall surface.
gg. Circumferential groove 10% deep by 1/8" long by 360 degrees on the outer tube
wall surface.
Probe positioning and feeding shall be accomplished remotely for in-service inspection
whenever practical. Baseline inspection may be done manually.
Communications shall be provided by the use of a Model 1 four-channel mixer system.
Personnel Qualifications
Personnel collecting data in accordance with this procedure shall be qualified to Level I or
higher in accordance with Document QA 101. Personnel interpreting data collected in accordance with procedure shall be qualified to Levell lA or higher in accordance with Document QA
101. Prior to receiving a certification, the applicants shall have completed the program recommended by SNT-TC-1A (1968 edition), Supplement E.
D.
E.
PRECAUTIONS
1.
All personnel to be engaged in eddy current inspection programs at operating plants shall have
received instructions in and understand the radiation protection rules and guidelines in effect
on the plant site.
2.
All personnel to be engaged in the test program shall wear protective clothing to the extent of
the type defined by the exclusion area work permit.
3.
All personnel entering a radiation work area will have proven their ability to work in a face mask
by successfully passing the pulmonary function test during their annual physical.
4.
No entries shall be made into the steam generator channel head without the presence of a
qualified health physics technician.
5.
Ensure that nozzle covers (when applicable) are securely in place inside the vessel prior to commencement of the eddy current inspection program.
PERFORMANCE
1.
Preparation
a.
b.
c.
Install the four-channel communications system control box at the control-operation center.
d.
e.
Install XXXX/XX eddy current test instrument, tape recorder, and Brush recorder at controloperation center.
f.
Connect the horizontal and vertical outputs from the XXXX/XX eddy current test instrument to the H & V input jacks of the FM tape recorder.
g.
Connect the H & V output jacks of the FM tape recorder to the two-channel inputs of the
Brush recorder.
Procedure No. QA 3
2.
113
i.
Connect Amphenol plug of the probe to receptacle on XXXX/XX eddy current test instrument. Be sure to use a 100' extension cable in series with the probe.
j.
Po~ition the trace to the center horizontal line of the CRT graticule and sweep the trace
honzontally across the screen, utilizing the position knob on the XXXX.
NOTE: Trac~ is parallel to the horizontal line on graticule. If necessary, adjust the trace
rotat1on knob on the back of the XXXX/XX.
k.
Turn XXXX/XX sensitivity to zero and center oscilloscope spot at the center of the graticule
using the position knobs.
I.
Place all front panel switches on the FM tape recorder in the "up" position, start the tape
recorder in the record mode. Advance the record knobs until both meters are in the upper
position of the red scale. Run at low speed (3-3/4 in/sec).
m.
Depress the microphone key and speak into the microphone. Temporarily, use the communication headset to assure that the voice recorded on the tape is loud and clear.
n.
With the tape recorder operating in the record mode and the oscilloscope spot centered,
center the Brush chart pens with both channels set on 200 M.V./div. and in the calibrated
position.
0.
With the position controls on the oscilloscope, make sure that the channels are correctly
connected and the equipment will swing full scale both directions. One volt deflection of
XXXX/XX should give one major division deflection on Brush recorder.
Equipment Calibration
a.
Prior to the commencement of the eddy current examination of the steam generator tubes
and after the replacement of any component, the equipment shall be calibrated in accordance with the following steps:
i.
Insert the bobbin coil probe into a section of the calibration standard which is free of
defects.
ii.
Select the desired operation frequency (as per the specific calibration procedure) by
operating first the "coarse" and then the "fine" FREQUENCY control knobs on the
front panel.
iii. Set the balance selector switch to "L" or "C" as required for the specific test frequency/probe combination.
iv. Set the sensitivity to zero and center the oscilloscope spot with the position controls.
v.
Set the sensitivity adjustment knob to 050.
vi.
Set the R and X balance knobs to 500.
vii. Depress the automatic null push button.
viii. Release the automatic null button when spot motion ceases or reaches a minimum.
This indicates null condition.
NOTE: As proper null is achieved, the X and R BALANCE controls will appear to
"hunt." This is a normal occurrence. If rotation of the X and R BALANCE
controls is not observed, verify that the dial-locking mechanisms are in their
fully unlocked positions (full counterclockwise). Manually check freedom of
rotation.
ix. Set the sensitivity knob as stated in the specific calibration procedures.
x.
Re-balance with the automatic null.
xi. Set the oscilloscope attenuators to 1 volt/division.
xii. Rotate the phase control until the probe motion signal is horizontal (as per the specific calibration procedure) and the first lobe of the 100% drill hole goes down first as
the probe is withdrawn from the standard.
xiii. Position the trace to the center of the CRT display by rotating the position control
knobs (inner red knobs on the attenuators).
65
Procedure No. QA 3
3.
114
4.
5.
a.
Eddy current inspection activities shall be performed with equipment sensitivities and
speeds set as follows:
i.
Oscilloscope attenuator settings shall be 1 or 2 volts/division on both the vertical and
horizontal amplifiers.
ii.
The tape recorder shall be run at low speed.
iii. The Brush recorder sensitivity shall be set as per the Specific Calibration Procedure.
iv. The Brush recorder shall be run at 5 mm/second for all defect inspections and 25
mm/second for all sludge measurement inspections.
v.
Insert probe completely through the calibration standard. Record pertinent data at
beginning on both sides of magnetic tape and corresponding brush paper. Start tape
recorder and Brush chart recorder and record calibration standards while withdrawing probe through standard past the defects. The system is now ready for operation.
b.
Visual verification of the identity of the specific tube being inspected shall be performed
before and after each fixture change and at the beginning and end of each side of
magnetic tape. Verification of the positive identification of tube location shall be recorded
on both the magnetic tape and strip charts.
c.
Should the performance of the tube identity verification reveal an error has occurred in the
recording of probe location, all tubes examined since the previous verification of location
shall be reexamined.
d.
The equipment calibration shall be verified and recorded at the beginning and end of each
side of the reel of magnetic tape. The calibration shall be checked frequently by observing
that the tube support plates are at the proper phase angle. At a minimum, the calibration
will be verified at 4-hour intervals and after any equipment change.
e.
Should the equipment be found to be out of calibration, the equipment will be recalibrated
as per Section E-2 of this procedure. The recalibration will be noted on both the magnetic
tape and strip chart. The data interpreter will determine if it is necessary to reinspect any
of the tubes.
a.
The data recording shall be made during probe withdrawal. Withdrawal speed is 14" per
second maximum. No minimum speed specification is required, but a good uniform pull of
12" per second is preferred.
b.
Since no inspection is performed during probe insertion, the speed should be as rapid as
possible.
c.
The prober shall have continuous communication with the equipment operator and both
personnel must concur on the tube number being examined.
d.
Due to radiation exposure or endurance factors, combinations of probe guides and probe
pusher/pullers may be used to facilitate the inspection.
NOTE:
a.
Ensure that all probe positioner, probe feeder, and probe and communication connecting cables are clear of access walkways and secured to any available supports.
Install remotely operated probe feeder local to steam generator with "on-off," "forwardreverse" control at control-operation center.
66
Procedure No. QA 3
F.
115
b.
Verify correct direction of rotation of probe feeder (make sure slow speed retracts probe).
c.
Check the operation of the remotely operated eddy current positioner and connect the
flexible probe conduits to the probe guide tube and the probe pusher.
d.
Install remotely operated probe positioner on tube sheet of the steam generator to provide
coverage of the area to be examined.
e.
f.
Connect power supply-control cable assembly to the control console at the control-operation center.
g.
Verify the correct operation and control of the remotely operated probe positioner.
h.
Utilizing the probe pusher, feed the probe through the flexible conduit up to the guide tube
of the positioner.
i.
Operate the positioner to locate the probe beneath the tube to be examined.
j.
Utilizing the probe pusher, feed the probe into and up the tube to the desired height.
Monitor the extent of insertion by reference to impedance signals from tube supports on
the oscilloscope screen.
k.
Withdraw the eddy current probe from the tube until the impedance signal on the oscilloscope screen indicates that the probe is clear of the tube sheet. Concurrent with the probe
withdrawal, visually monitor the signals displayed on the oscilloscope screen while recording all data on the magnetic tape and strip chart recorder.
I.
Reposition the probe beneath the next tube selected for examination.
m.
Repeat the procedures described in the preceding steps until all the tubes selected for inspection have been examined.
Requirements
a.
The data interpreter shall be certified to Level IIA or Ill as per Procedure QA 101.
b.
Data shall be collected with an eddy current test system with a current certification of calibration as per procedure CSP.
c.
Data shall be interpreted with an interpretation system with a current certification of calibratiorr as per procedure CSP.
d.
The data collection station shall be calibrated with an approved standard which is serialized and traceable to master calibration standard.
e.
The identify of the plant site, the steam generator, the date, the test frequency, the calibration standard serial numbers, and reel side numbers shall be recorded at the start of each
new reel and side of magnetic tape and its companion roll of chart paper.
f.
The data collection station shall be set up and calibrated as per Procedure QA 3.
67
Procedure No. QA 3
2.
11-6
Performance
a.
The
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
b.
Preservice inspections
aa. Report all indications observed. Include the approximate axial position of the indication with respect to a known structural member.
Interpretation
i.
All data shall be recorded on form A3 or equivalent.
ii.
The conversion from signal phase angles to defect depths shall be accomplished via
the following:
Table Number
QA 4.1
QA4.2
QA4.3
iii.
iv.
v.
G.
REFERENCES
The following documents are required for the performance of eddy current inspection programs
utilizing the methods described in this procedure.
1.
Required Documents
a.
Eddy current inspection specific calibration procedure document applicable to the plant
to be inspected.
b.
c.
Eddy current inspection program fixtures placement detail document applicable to model
of steam generator to be inspected (when applicable).
68
117
FORM NUMBER
SITE
STEAM GENERATOR#_ _ _ _ TUBE MATERIAL _ _ DIA. _ _ WALL _ _
DATE _________________
HOTLEG __________________
COLDLEG _________________
XXX X/XX
1. Frequency _______________ _______________
2. Sensitivity _____________
3. Balance
Manual _ _ Auto _ _ L _ _ C _ _
69
A 2 Rev. 2
REVIEW QUESTIONS
Q.91
Q.92
Q.93
0.94
0.95
0.96
0.97
The prime artificial discontinuity used to calibrate the system described in QA 3 is:
A.
20% ID
B.
50% OD
c. 100%
D. 50% ID
0.98
In QA 3,
A.
B.
C.
D.
0.9-9
0.910
70
0.9-11
0.912
Referring
A.
B.
C.
D.
reinspected
reported
reevaluated
removed from service
to QA 3, QA 4.1 is a _ _ _ __
calibration form
data interpretation table
data report form
certification form
71
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
3-7
3-8
3-9
3-10
5-1
5-2
5-3
5-4
5-5
5-6
5-7
5-8
5-9
5-10
8-1
8-2
8-3
8-4
8-5
8-6
8-7
8-8
8-9
8-10
B
B
c
A
B
D
B
B
c
A
(4, p. 19)
(4, p. 19)
(4, p. 20)
(4, p. 20)
(4, p. 23)
(13, p. 4)
(4, p. 25)
(4, p. 26)
(4, p. 26)
(4, p. 45)
Q 2-1
Q 2-2
Q 2-3
Q 2-4
Q 2-5
Q 2-6
Q 2-7
Q 2-8
Q 2-9
Q 2-10
(4, p. 328)
(2, p. 36)
(4, p. 332)
Q 4-1
Q4-2
Q 4-3
Q 4-4
Q 4-5
Q 4-6
Q 4-7
Q 4-8
Q 4-9
Q 4-10
Q 4-11
Q 4-12
D
D
D
c
c
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
B
D
B
B
(2, p. 38)
(19, p. 78)
(4, p. 212)
(4, p. 195)
(4, p. 173)
(4, p. 211)
(19, p. 79)
(5, p. 37.20)
(5, p. 36.13)
(5, p. 36.13)
(5, p. 36.13)
(4, p. 37)
(4, p. 37)
(19, p. 82)
(5, p. 37.20)
(12, p. 289)
(4, p. 270)
(13, p. 59)
(12, p. 282)
(12, p. 256)
(13, p. 47)
(12, p. 129)
(4, p. 51)
(11, p. 631)
(12, p. 121)
(19, p. 102)
Q 6-1
Q 6-2
Q 6-3
Q 6-4
Q 6-5
Q 6-6
Q 6-7
Q 6-8
Q 6-9
Q 6-10
Q 6-11
Q 6-12
Q 6-13
Q 6-14
Q 9-1
Q 9-2
Q 9-3
Q 9-4
Q 9-5
Q 9-6
Q 9-7
Q 9-8
Q 9-9
Q 9-10
Q 9-11
Q 9-12
c
c
A
B
D
B
A
c
B
B
c
A
c
D
B
B
B
c
c
c
B
B
72
(4, p. 60)
(4, p. 60)
(5, p. 40.1)
(5, p. 40.14)
(4, p. 64)
(2, p. 4-26)
(5, p. 40.23)
(5, p. 42.4)
(5, p. 42.35)
(5, p. 40.31)
(4, p. 215)
(12, p. 219)
(7, p. 387)
(4, p. 77)
(18 Part II, p. iii)
(18 Part II, p. iii)
(18 Part I~ p. 288)
(15, p. 1)
(17 Section V, p. X)
(QA-3, p. 2)
(QA-3, p. 3)
(QA-3, p. 4)
(QA-3, p. 4)
(QA-3, p. 5)
(QA-3, p. 6)
(QA-3, p. 6)
(5,
(4,
(4,
(5,
(4,
(6,
(4,
(4,
(4,
(4,
B
D
D
B
B
D
B
E
p.
p.
p.
p.
p.
p.
p.
p.
p.
p.
38.25)
194)
71)
40.1)
195)
353)
69)
210)
198)
211)
(2, p. 8)
(12, p. 95)
(9, p. 56)
(2, p. 13)
(19, p. 78)
(4, p. 171)
(4, p. 173)
(2, p. 26)
(6, p. 360)
(5, p. 36.17)
(19, p, 88)
(4, p. 27)
D
D
B
B
D
A
B
A
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
7-1
7-2
7-3
7-4
7-5
7-6
7-7
7-8
7-9
7-10
D
A
A
(4, p. 76)
(4, p. 76)
(7, p. 238)
A
D
D
B
B
B
(4, p. 250)
(12, p. 450)