The Chargesheet served to me by the Proctors Office, AMU after my second suspension. The Proctor Office could not produce any evidence with the Chargesheet. In this light I have written in my reply asking them to produce evidence first.
The Chargesheet served to me by the Proctors Office, AMU after my second suspension. The Proctor Office could not produce any evidence with the Chargesheet. In this light I have written in my reply asking them to produce evidence first.
The Chargesheet served to me by the Proctors Office, AMU after my second suspension. The Proctor Office could not produce any evidence with the Chargesheet. In this light I have written in my reply asking them to produce evidence first.
MAA. (Mass. Com) residing in Aflab Hall have been: placed under
1No.2113/Proc dated 03.06.2010 are, hereby, charge sheeted and
yeni.
‘THE PROCTOR
AMU, ALIGARH
Dated: 09.06.2010
Te pemaeerdnnre
nteaiees CHARGE SHEET
Through: tab Hall, AMU,
‘You, Me. Adil Hossain having Roll No 09/MCM/06 bearing En.
‘That you reportedly have mobilized, collected and spearhead
‘members of Aftab Hall, SS Hall (South) and S.S. Hall (North)
rousing speeches against the lawful authorities of the Universit
them to block the main University road from 8.8. Hall, $.S. Hg
sides. Thereby the work of electricity restoration in progress
to a standstill in the night between 01/02, June 2010 from 9.00 to}
a. mob of resident
delivering rabble-
‘whereby instigated
we and V.C. Lodge
hindered and came
{oss pm,
‘mongering, canard
ty and depicting the
the poor light by
untimely and sad
ent in the print and
exploiting the natural calamities such as crippling cyclone
demise of an student for your personal projection and aggrandi
electronic media
‘That you have adamantly and audaciously lowered down and
the University by resorting to and misusing the Internet (AMU
verments and ipse dixi utterances without any cogent concern ch
‘or credible evidence on Internet on wwww.yahi
“TheAligarhForvm@yahoogroups.com” and
other AMU related websites regarding sending of the body of
installation of the CCT cameras and sanctioning of money
pocketed by the officials of the University
‘That you did not leave any stone unturned in damaging
University by imputing allegations with an ulterior motive that a
and arousing disharmony, disturbance and creating ill will
‘Administration and its functionaries. Moreover, you are flagrant!
destabilize the smooth, vibrant and proper functioning ofthe Uni
That you had gone to the station on 9/10" May, 2010 with
meditated and pre-conceived mind and mobilized, assembles
students at the railway stati
plausible proof
hosted websites
and
for their repair being
reputation of the
jounts to defamation
ust the University
doing everything to
sity.
4 preoccupied, pre~
were one of the
id exert pressure on
and sinister design
‘organizers of the students’ mob at the railway station to mount
the Railway authorities to the extent of violence. Your nefario
appeared to be to malign the image of the University and its offials, It is axiomatic
from the Enquiry Report that you are d Ito the University
at behest of some disgruntled elements and playing in the hands] f some sick mindedPeople who do not want to see peace, progress aid prospe
campus,
‘and around the
6 That you had stv partciatein he std gation eh Oc. 25, Nov. 26
2009) staged at AMU Campus dant MantrsNew Dei feichposeds ak
Cats and precpiated the close ofthe Unvesty whbrter fee hed ten
suspended but you had reared your behaviour before the Lepings Cormeen
held on 30112009 and on underaking thereto of ged teh dncd Oa eee
ay sutmited tthe Prcto’s Oe deposi teen. °! Poe te sneaaot
wreaking thet b fr, wl fay bide by the Aig Main Chara
Students" Gntict and Disiptne Rae, 1983 andthe sare tae acne
being ivy nthe fst ose,
Is compe lke nv te tenes Age, 8 proce
case of unbecoming of a University student wommitting acts of i misconduct and
ip jo fade ose eh ae pte Pheer
Ral ih, Go an Ce ai ANE Sone Cals Be hs
You are, therefore hereby directed and required to submit your ey of tages ssp
within ten days fom the date of receipt of this Charge Sheet failgg which ishlt te
resumed a if you have nothing to sayin your defence and an exparpenal action shall be
Droceeded with
~ (Dr. Faretd A. Khan)
Officiating Proctor
LD. No.2127:/Pr0e. Dated} 99.06.2010
Copy to:
|. Provost, Aftab Hall,
2. Person ConcemedTo
The Vice-Chancellor
AM.U, Aligarh Dated: ZB- 06 = 2010
Subject- Request to direct either to withdraw my suspension order & Charge
sheet or to provide me with statement of imputation and evidences to prove the
allegations levelled against me in the Charge-sheet issued vide OM LD No.
2177/Proc dated 09.06.2010 received by me on 26.06.2010.
Sir,
1 was suspended vide OM LD No, 2113/Proc dated 03.062010, received by men
04.06.2010, that also placed the campus out of bounds for me. I was therefore
required by the Provost, Aftab Hall, to vacate the hostel immediately, which I did. It
is pertinent that the suspension order mentioned only three allegations against me.
A Charge-sheot issued to me vide OM LD No. 2117/ Proc dated 09.06.2010, received
by me on 26.06.2010 , which required me to submit a reply, as my defence, to the
allegations contained therein within 10 days of the date of receiving it. The following,
‘may kindly be considered in this regard
1, The Charge-sheet comprises 6 allegations, ie. 3 additional allegations to the
cones mentioned in the suspension order, which can only be construed as after,
thought and therefore bad in law rendering a grave shortcoming. in the
charge sheet involving extraneous reasons and therefore liable to be quashed.
2, The saidl Charge-sheet does not contain any statement of imputation nor does
it attach any evidence by which the allegations levelled against me are to be
substantiated, which can only imply two things:
a) That there is no statement of imputation against me nor is there any
evidence to substantiate the allegations levelled against me. In short, there
are no grounds for allegations, which are then flimsy, whimsical and with
malafide intent
) That it is preferred not to provide me the evidences by which the
allegations are to be substantiated to deny me an opportunity of informed
and full defence. In short, there is an attempt to deny me natural justice;
this suspicion gains strengthen from the fact that without providing me an
opportunity to be heard not only was I suspended but also required to
vacate the hostel immediately denying my human rights, which speaks
volumes about the intent involved.
In view of the above, if 2(a) is true then it is requested that my suspension
order and the Charge-sheet be directed to be withdrawn immediately. In case
2(b) is true then directions be issued to provide me with statement of{mpatation and all the evidences by which the allegations levelled against me
are to be substantiated (1 am very sure that you as the Executive and
‘Academic Head of the University would ensure that I am provided an
opportunity of well informed and full defence against the allegations
contained in the said Charge-sheet).
It ie further roquested that the 10 days limit of presenting my defence
specifying in the Charge-sheet may be directed to begin from the day that I
receive all evidences by which the allegations levelled against me are to be
‘substantiated so that Ihave sufficient time to prepare my defence, é
‘Thanking, you
‘Yours faithfully
Corresponding Address: Md. Adil Hossain
‘M.A(Prev) Mass Comm. , Roll no- 09MCM06, EN No-GA0403
(C/O-Mr. Mohd. Chaman
‘Quarter No-F/3, V.M. Hall Compound
AMLU, Aligarh-202002