Introduction Specific purpose: I want to persuade my audience that the electoral college system of electing presidents in the U.S. is flawed, and needs to be changed. Thesis statement: The Electoral College has many flaws, and this system needs to be changed to restore the integrity of the election of the President of the United States. Main Ideas The Electoral College. What is it, and how did it come to be? Origins of the Electoral College 1. 1787 the constitution of the U.S. was written, and the Electoral College system was also created within the constitution. Article II, Section 1. 2. Originally, U.S. senators werent chosen directly by people either, state legislatures did. 3. In those times, African-Americans could not vote, and neither could women. 4. In 1870, African-Americans gained the right to vote, 1920, women gained that right. 5. 538 total Electoral Votes. 270 needed to win the election. In the event of a tie, the House of
THE FLAWS OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
Representatives chooses the president from the top 3 vote getters. Why this system is no longer needed. 1. Technology a. Candidates can now communicate with voters much easier with the developments of technology, and can get their message across to the whole country. 2. Everyone over the age of 18 now has the right to vote a. With every adult U.S. citizen having the right to vote, there is no longer a need to give certain states more value than others due to slavery, or lack of the right for women to vote. The controversies of the Electoral College system. 1. Presidents being elected by winning the Electoral vote, but losing the popular vote. This has happened 4 times in history. 1824, 1876, 1888, and most recently 2000 2. Congress has pushed for reform since 1797, with more than 1000 bills attempting to change the Electoral College system, but yet no progress has
THE FLAWS OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
been made. Over 215 years without significant
change to the election system. 3. The value of each citizens vote is varied based on the amount of electoral votes each state has, and whether that state is considered a swing state. a. The swing states for the 2012 election according to CNN include: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Virginia, and Wisconsin. This is 8 states, and are the primary focus of both candidates. The other 42 states are not nearly as important, which promotes inequality. b. The one person, one vote concept that is explained in the 17th amendment of the constitution is not truly equal with the Electoral College. 4. The constitution does not bind the electors to vote for the candidates that they pledged to vote for. These are referred to as faithless electors. In 1972, 1976, 1988, and 2000 individual electors pledged to vote for the top 2 candidates, either casted blank ballots or voted for other candidates. This leaves uncertainty in citizens votes. No election has been decided because of this, but the possibility is still there.
THE FLAWS OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
People who arent represented by the Electoral College system.
1. Guam, Puerto-Rico and are governed by the United States government, and follow policies made by the U.S. 2. These people are not allowed to vote in U.S. elections 3. 4 million people live in these territories, and cannot vote in these elections. Summary of problems: 1. Devalues one person, one vote principle in constitution a. Swing states receive much more attention from candidates than other states. 2. Winner of popular vote, loses due to Electoral College values 3. U.S. Territories have no right to vote, despite being governed by the U.S. Conclusion: Solution to the problem, and how to achieve this solution. 1. Election of the President of the United States by purely popular vote, just like we do to elect House of Representatives, and Senate. 2. Allow U.S. territories to vote in our elections, if we are to govern them.
THE FLAWS OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
3. Everyone needs to contact local representatives,
and senators to voice the need for change. Why this is an effective solution. 1. This would bring equality into the election process, and finally fix the current outdated system. It would prevent someone being elected that wasnt voted for by the majority of the people. A one person, one vote solution could potentially increase voter turnout rates, because of the feeling that their vote is truly equal to everyone elses.
THE FLAWS OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
Bibliography Blau, A. (2004). Fairness and Electoral Reform. British Journal Of Politics &
International Relations, 6(2), 165-181. doi:10.1111/j.1467856X.2004.00132.x
Bolinger, B. (2007). POINT: ABOLISHING THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE.
International Social Science Review, 82(3/4), 179-182. Federal Register. U.S. Electoral College. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoralcollege/index.html Goux, D., & Hopkins, D. (2008, November). The Empirical Implications of
Electoral College Reform. American Politics Research, 36(6), 857-
879. doi:
10.1177/1532673X08324213
THE FLAWS OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
Stark, C. Roberts, A. (2012, October 26). By the numbers: Swing states.
Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/11/politics/btnswing-