Academic writing in English.

Androgenization of a gender.

In the middle of 20th century the term “gender” was the most used in the psychological articles
about determination of the biological and social sex, which gender generally is. Androgenization
is the process of progressive advent to a single, “middle” social sex.
Currently,In our time the target of researchers of interests is in are gender studies and,
speifiecially, the way it changes in a feminization or masculinization changesway. Social sex
depends on a lot of things, such as genetics heritage and the social conditions of a human men’s
life (race, education, prosperity,etc.).
In recentthe last few years, scientists are fighting for domination of their re theories in the field
of psychology. ical society. Theory, we are talk Ting about is the most provocative theory-
labelled androgenization – it causes much debate a lot of arguing in the sphere of gender
changing. The wWell-known American psychologist, Allan Pease, in his book “Why men don’t
listen and women can’t read maps” was one of the first who wrote about thisthat theory from the
side of the “unbelievers”, basing his point of view on experiments of Israel colleagues in
“kibbutziumkibucie” camps. In these That experiments, were meant for placing children of both
sexes were placed under in the same conditions terms with no differential behavior or other
separations based on traditional gender role arrangementsex prejudges. As a the result, girls and
boys had created found they own ways of behavior way,but in anyway stood by their
traditional gender roles.there sex – Israel scientists noticed more opened communication between
girls, boy’s engaged ins “leadership fights” underneath normal communicating systems, even
choiceosing of toys was different – female children wanted to play dolls, sublimating there
mothers, caring instincts, while male children were choosing warrior characters, trying to
identifiy cate with theirre own society leader.
In focusing on Mentioning that this experimentproject, Mr. Pease shows that people are constant
followers of their nature, representing that, citation, – “man will always be man and woman will
always be woman”. (Pease )
But we should notn’t forget, that on the another hand, adherents of the theory of “constant sex”
can notn’t deny rising amount of children, having body formation, appropriate to both sexes,
whichhat clearly shows the progressing of genome mutations, such as the XXY and the XO
genome.
Is thisat a foundation of a new type of human race or just horrible result of nature destroying? –
At present,nobody can say confidently now.
Also, one thing must notn’t be forgotten – gender is based not on just on social condtions or
geneticsthe social part of life as well, not only on genome heritage, but on the way we are
“working” with itthat. Looking closely at it, anthropologists could mention the important
influence of feministic movement all over the world and gender roles mixing in thea life of a
society – men should not n’t be “manly”, they do notn’t have to fight for their food or female
anymore, as well, as women have no need to releylay on male part of the family in reaching
well-being.
So, we can say, that the whole sphere of the relationship is changing,, and when the terms are
changed, evolution appears on the stage. It could probably be, that our genome is changing just
by our “dwelling area” dictated by society.
In a few years, discussion of this theme has grown up into a really hardened argumenting, in
which a lot of anthropologists and physiologists are involved with theirre opinions.