Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Since antiquity, sheep (Ovis aries) have been domesticated for
the production of meat, albeit often as a secondary product
from wool production. This has resulted in a range of sheep
breeds that vary in terms of production and climatic adaptation
specializations. Therefore, there are inherent differences
between sheep breeds regarding meat productivity and quality.
For example, a purebred Australian Merino is a specialized wool
breed that will produce lighter carcass weight with lean meat
over a longer growth period when compared with a meat specialist breed such as Suffolk or Texel. Using this information,
producers have tailored their production systems to optimize
breed effects, in terms of feed usage and production localities,
to achieve optimum meat yields and quality. Furthermore,
tactical management of feeding systems prior to slaughter that
offers optimum dietary nutrients as protein, energy, and micronutrients can provide more shifts in yield and quality and allow
producers greater responsiveness to changes in market requirements or specification.
Sheep meat production is highly versatile and immediately
employs many livelihoods around the globe, in both small
holdings and large-scale extensive or intensive production systems. This is facilitated by its inclusion within various culinary
diets, based upon sheep meat having a highly nutritious composition and distinctive flavor although ideal flavor is debatable, depending on cultural backgrounds. Consequently, sheep
meat is a key tradable commodity and the focus of much effort to
enhance its nutritional and eating qualities and ensure these are
preserved from production to consumption through processing
and retail. To assist in the clarification of sheep meat, animals are
generally divided into age-dependent categories: lamb, being
meat from animal slaughter prior to 12 months of age; hogget
or yearling, defining the age bracket between lamb and mutton;
and mutton, being meat from animals once the age of 24
months old is surpassed. These definitions highlight the importance of animal age to carcass value, meat composition, and
eating quality characteristics. Herein, the word sheep meat covers
aspects of meat from both lambs (younger age animals lamb)
and sheep (older age animal mutton).
This article aims to detail sheep meat, with reference to
production and processing aspects, in terms of production
types, nutritional composition and health implications, sensory and eating quality traits, and spoilage pathways that
require preservative attention.
Production
In 2010, sheep meat production represented only 3% of the
total global meat production, and this market share emphasizes
750
the huge potential for growth available. This scope for advancement in sheep meat production is encouraging to traditional
sheep meat-producing nations, such as New Zealand and
Australia, which have a strong export focus and access to developing markets in the European Union, the Middle East, North
America, and Asia. However, the global sheep meat industry
faces limitations, which may undermine future growth,
including animal and human welfare considerations, increased
competition for land and feed resources, climatic impacts from
intensified production, and economic restrictions on international trade. Overcoming these hurdles is the responsibility of
all sheep meat stakeholders. Regardless, domestic consumption
of sheep meats is increasing over recent years, and this has
resulted in better prices being offered for sheep meat productions, especially lamb, in comparison with other meats.
Stakeholders across the supply chain from producer,
processor, to retail are vital to the industry, but producers are
particularly important. The production of sheep meat, broadly
speaking, can be categorized into two groups: (1) small holdings, which are more common in developing countries or
hobby farms and generally maintain a small flock (often <20
animals), or (2) large holdings, which can have flock numbers
into the thousands and routinely manage animals on an entire
flock basis. Animals are reared under two main feeding systems:
(1) extensive grazing on traditional pasture feeding and (2)
intensive production systems maintained on concentrate
grain-based diets. However, feeding systems can be combined
depending on availability of resources, quality of feeds, and
the purpose of production. Sheep maintained under extensive
grazing receive diets with high protein (e.g., green pasture)
and grow slower, while animals maintained under intensive
systems receive high energy and grow faster. These in turn can
impact on the muscle composition and eating quality traits
of meat.
Historically, operations with a wool-only production focus
would consider sheep meat as a by-product, but this is no
longer universally true. The advent of synthetic fibers and narrow potential for expansion in traditional or new market share
have both contributed to low wool prices. As a result, many
traditional wool producers have adopted dual-purpose production focus. This entails flocks dominated by dual-purpose sheep
breeds, such as Corriedale and Finnsheep, that equally specialize in both wool and meat production. Another approach to
dual-purpose production uses a base wool specialist flock
joined with a meat specialist breed to achieve progeny with
hybrid vigor and both wool and meat quality characteristics.
Under traditional Australian commercial practices, lambs
under grazing conditions are slaughtered between 4 and 10
months of age, where they reach a live weight to produce
carcasses of 18 kg or more. Sheep production in Australia
uses different genotypes under various production systems.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00620-6
Sheep: Meat
Table 1
Comparative percentage muscle (lean (%)) and fat (fat (%))
contents of different sheep genotypes that were slaughtered when
having a hot carcass weight of 20, 30, or 40 kg
Weight (kg)
Genotype
Age (months)
Lean (%)
Fat (%)
20
M
BL M
PD M
PD M
PD (BL M)
M
M
BL M
PD M
PD (BL M)
M
BL M
BL M
PD M
PD M
PD (BL M)
PD (BL M)
8
8
4
8
4
14
22
14
14
8
22
14
22
14
22
14
22
76.4
74.9
77.5
77.1
76.8
71.5
67.2
68.3
71.3
70.8
65.0
64.0
60.0
67.8
63.9
65.9
61.9
20.4
22.2
19.5
20.1
20.6
24.3
28.5
28.1
25.2
26.0
30.2
32.1
36.0
28.4
32.3
30.7
34.6
30
40
The genotypes investigated were Australian Merino (M), Border Leicester (BL), and Poll
Dorset (PD).
Adapted from: Ponnampalam, E. N., Butller, K. L., Hopkins, D. L., Kerr, M. G., Dunshea,
F. R. and Warner, R. D. (2008). Genotype and age effects on sheep production. 5. Lean
meat and fat content in the carcasses of Australian sheep genotypes at 20-, 30- and
40-kg carcass weights. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 893897.
Composition
Sheep meat has a complex structure and consists of water
(73%) and protein (21%) fractions, with lipid (5%),
carbohydrate, and many vitamins and minerals also present
but in smaller amounts. The major water, protein, and fat of
meat (or muscle) composition can be affected by sheep genetics, feeding background, and age of sheep. The fat content of
meat ranges from 2% to 10% and can substantially influence
751
752
Sheep: Meat
Table 2
This information was sourced from Food Standards
Australia New Zealand (2010) and describes the nutrient content of raw
meat (per 100 g fresh weight) sampled from 11 different cuts that were
from various regions of the sheep carcass (lamb and mutton)
Nutrient
Energy (kJ)
Moisture (g)
Protein (g)
Total fat (g)
Saturated fat (g)
Polyunsaturated fat (g)
Monounsaturated fat (g)
Cholesterol (mg)
Total long-chain omega-3 (mg)
Minerals
Sodium (mg)
Iron (mg)
Selenium (mg)
Zinc (mg)
Phosphorus (mg)
Calcium (mg)
Vitamins
Retinol (vitamin A) (mg)
Thiamine (B1) (mg)
Riboflavin (B2) (mg)
Niacin (B3) (mg)
Pantothenic acid (B5) (mg)
Pyridoxine (B6) (mg)
Cobalamin (B12) (mg)
Vitamin E (mg)
Lamb
Mutton
2315
31
10.8
57.6
25.7
2.7
20.8
62
140.7
2522
28.8
8.2
64.4
28.6
3.7
24.1
72
163.0
22
0.41
22
56
5
33
0.77
10
0.99
88
10
34
0.07
2
0.43
0.1
2.9
1.1
64
0.07
5
0.46
0.1
2.9
0.7
Quality
The quality of sheep meat is fundamentally determined by its
appeal to consumers and their tangible experience following
mastication. To better understand the appeal of sheep meat,
consumer responses are routinely defined as major sensory
characteristics: (1) tenderness, also known as mouthfeel or
texture; (2) flavor, which is the intrinsic combination of both
smell and taste senses; (3) appearance or color when sheep
meat is retailed or on display; and (4) juiciness or moistness.
These four sensory characteristics provide insight into the overall consumer acceptability of sheep meat.
Tenderness refers to the ease by which sheep meat can be
severed and chewed during mastication. This is widely considered to have the most authority over perceived quality when
compared with other sensory characteristics and hence acts as a
key discriminating factor for consumers selecting sheep meat. In
Australia, for example, lamb maintains a significantly larger
portion of the sheep meat market than mutton, largely related
to improved tenderness. This highlights the influence animal age
has on tenderness, but other factors such as breed, genetics,
muscle type, and even location within a muscle can affect tenderness. The pathway by which these shape meat tenderness
revolves around their influence on myofibril type, distribution,
and amount and intramuscular fat (IMF) content. Evidence
suggests that tender sheep meat results from a greater density of
thinner myofibrils with improved collagen solubility and when
IMF levels exceed 3% which is the threshold for consumer
acceptability. Therefore, much investigation toward understanding genes controlling tenderness and their inheritability has been
undertaken for inclusion into breeding programs. However,
genetic contribution to tenderness must be balanced with management practices to achieve optimum tenderness.
The management of animal stress prior and during slaughter, particularly during lairage and on the kill floor, is important
to improve meat tenderness. It is also common following
slaughter and during the processing stage to apply other
methods to further enhance tenderness. These methods include
(1) mechanical stretching, wherein a carcass is positioned (e.g.,
pelvis hanging, or tenderstretch) or physically manipulated
(e.g., carcass pull); (2) temperature manipulation, which
avoids toughening in response to cold shortening or heat shortening in combination with various hygienic and spoilage considerations; (3) pH modification, to prompt a better and
hygienic pH and temperature decline rate and prevent cold
shortening; and (4) aging; increasing the period between
slaughter and consumption of meat kept refrigerated allows
myofibrils and muscle structures to tenderize due to changes
Sheep: Meat
753
754
Sheep: Meat
16
15
14
13
Pasture
12
11
Grain
15
Pasture
14
13
Grain
12
11
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.8
1.0
(a)
Pasture
Grain
12
80
70
90
100
15
Pasture
14
Grain
13
12
100
110
(c)
140
160
180
16
16
a*-value day 3 and day 4
120
(d)
Pasture
14
Grain
13
12
11
160
(e)
1.6
11
11
15
1.4
16
14
13
1.2
16
15
1.0
(b)
15
14
13 Pasture
12
Grain
11
180
200
220
240
260
280
(f)
Figure 1 Scatter plots of redness (a*) of sheep meat after 3 and 4 days of retail display with (a) heme iron, (b) nonheme iron, (c) total omega-3 (n3),
(d) total omega-6 (n6), (e) total polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), and (f) vitamin E, measured in the M. longissimus lumborum. Parallel
regression lines are fitted for lambs grazing pasture only (dashed) or offered with hay supplemented with grain (solid). Adapted from Ponnampalam, E.
N., Butler, K. L., McDonagh, M. B., Jacobs, J. L. and Hopkins, D. L. (2012). Relationship between muscle antioxidant status, forms of iron,
polyunsaturated fatty acids and functionality (retail color) of meat in lambs. Meat Science 90, 297303.
Sheep: Meat
755
756
Sheep: Meat
18
15
12
9
6
3
0
0
18
15
12
9
6
3
Conclusion
The production and consumption of sheep meat support many
persons around the globe. This support may be economic, with
a section of most communities basing their livelihoods on
sheep meat retailing, processing, and/or producing, or support
may be nutritional, as sheep meat proves to be a highly nutritious source of many vitamins, minerals, protein, and healthy
fats such as omega-3s. Consequently, it is meritorious for all
stakeholders to explore production strategies, animal management, welfare of animals from farm to slaughter, and technological methods at processing and retail to improve sheep meat
quality and achieve a shared priority to deliver a product that a
consumer finds attractive and acceptable. This has resulted in
much research into what describes consumer preferences for
sheep meat and the underlying principles of preservation,
spoilage, or the degradation of these quality traits. Understanding spoilage has allowed steps toward preserving or maintaining sheep meat quality until consumption to be successfully
achieved, as fundamentally, it is consumer preference and
satisfaction with a sheep meat product upon which the entire
industry is based.
See also: Beef; Fats: Classification and Analysis; Fats: Production and
Uses of Animal Fats; Fatty Acids: Determination and Requirements;
Fatty Acids: Essential Fatty Acids; Fatty Acids: Fatty Acids; Fatty Acids:
Trans Fatty Acids; Iron: Biosynthesis and Significance of Heme; Iron:
Physiology of Iron; Iron: Properties and Determination; Meat:
Conversion of Muscle into Meat; Meat: Eating Quality and Preservation;
Meat: Role in the Diet; Meat: Structure; Protein: Digestion, Absorption
and Metabolism; Protein: Food Sources; Protein Quality and Amino
Acids in Maternal and Child Nutrition and Health; Protein:
Requirements; Proteins: Chemistry, Characterization, and Quality;
Sensory Evaluation: Sensory Rating and Scoring Methods.
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
Further Reading
Daley CA, Abbott A, Doyle PS, Nader GA, and Larson S (2010) A review of fatty acid
profiles and antioxidant content in grass-fed and grain-fed beef. Nutrition Journal
9: 10.
Dixon RM and Stockdale CR (1999) Associative effects between forages and grains:
consequences for feed utilization. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
50: 757774.
Faustman C, Sun Q, Mancini R, and Suman SP (2010) Myoglobin and lipid oxidation
interactions: mechanistic bases and control. Meat Science 86: 8694.
Sheep: Meat
Hopkins DL, Stanley DF, Martin LC, Ponnampalam EN, and van de Ven R (2007) Sire
and growth path effects on sheep meat production. 1. Growth and carcass
characteristics. Animal Production Science 47: 12081218.
Howe P, Buckley J, and Meyer BJ (2007) Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids in red meat.
Nutrition and Dietetics 64: 135139.
Howes NL, Ahmed AED, Burritt DJ, and Campbell AW (2015) Opportunities and
implications of pasture-based lamb fattening to enhance the long-chain fatty acid
composition in meat. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
14: 2236.
Lobley GE (1998) Nutritional and hormonal control of muscle and peripheral tissue
metabolism in farm species. Livestock Production Science 56: 91114.
McAfee AJ, McSorley EM, Cuskelly GJ, Moss BW, Wallace JMW, Bonham MP, and
Fearon AM (2010) Red meat consumption: an overview of the risks and benefits.
Meat Science 84: 113.
Montossi F, Font-i-Furnols M, Campo M, San Julian R, Brito B, and Sanudo C (2013)
Sustainable sheep production and consumer preference trends: compatibilities,
contradictions, and unresolved dilemmas. Meat Science 95: 772789.
Ponnampalam EN, Butler KL, Hopkins DL, Kerr MG, Dunshea FR, and Warner RD
(2008) Genotype and age effects on sheep meat production. 5. Lean meat and fat
content in the carcasses of Australian sheep genotypes at 20, 30 and 40 kg carcass
weights. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 893897.
Ponnampalam EN, Butler KL, McDonagh MB, Jacobs JL, and Hopkins DL (2012)
Relationship between muscle antioxidant status, forms of iron, polyunsaturated
757
fatty acids and functionality (retail color) of meat in lambs. Meat Science
90: 297303.
Ponnampalam EN, Norng S, Burnett VF, Dunshea FR, Jacobs JL, and Hopkins DL
(2014) The synergism of biochemical components controlling lipid oxidation in
lamb muscles. Lipids 49: 757766.
Scollan ND, Hocquette JF, Nuernberg K, Dannenberger D, Richardson I, and Moloney A
(2006) Innovations in beef production systems that enhance the nutritional and
health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. Meat Science
74: 1733.
Watkins PJ, Frank D, Singh TK, Young OA, and Warner RD (2013) Sheepmeat flavor
and the effect of different feeding systems: a review. Journal of Agricultural Food
Chemistry 61: 35613579.
Wood JD, Enser M, Fisher AV, et al. (2008) Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and
meat quality: a review. Meat Science 78: 343358.
Relevant Websites
http://ec.europa.eu European Commission.
www.fao.org Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
www.foodstandards.gov.au Food Standards Australia New Zealand.
www.mla.com.au Meat and Livestock Australia.
www.usda.gov U.S. Department of Agriculture.