Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
212
1/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
2/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
3/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
SPECIAL CIVIL
Certiorari.
ACTION
in
the
Supreme
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
Court.
4/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
217
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
5/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
218
6/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
219
Xerox
by Juan C. Tuvera
Undated handwritten letter
NNN
purportedly written
by Glecy R. Tantoco
OOO
PPP
QQQ
No remarks
whether
original or
photocopy
No remarks
whether
original or
photocopy
Xerox
(missing)
From APT
Corazon Aquino
Complaint filed by RP thru
RRR
Xerox
Management Corporation
Administrative Order No. 14
SSS
From APT
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
7/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
SSS
Xerox
whether
original or
photocopy
TTT
UUU
VVV
From APT
From APT
(missing)
From APT
220
Xerox
Xerox
21, 1966
Certificate of Filing of
YYY23YYY33
Amended Articles of
Incorporation dated Nov. 20,
Xerox
1981
NBI Questioned Documents
ZZZ
Original
Malacaang
Lib
AAAA3
AAAA4
AAAA5
Malacaang
Lib
Malacaang
Lib
Malacaang
Lib
Malacaang
Lib
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
8/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
Malacaang
paper (undated)
Lib
Handwritten note Office of
Malacaang
AAAA7
Lib
paper (undated)
Handwritten note dated Dec.
AAAA811
Malacaang
Lib
Malacaang
Lib
paper
221
AAAA18
AAAA1925
AAAA2729
AAAA3034
AAAA3541
BBBB
1a1b
BBBB2
7
BBBB8
12
BBBB
1320
BBBB
2128
BBBB
2933
Malacaang
Lib
Malacaang
Lib
Malacaang
Lib
Malacaang
Lib
Malacaang
Lib
photocopy
No remarks whether original or
photocopy
No remarks whether original or
photocopy
No remarks whether original or
CCCC1
11
Mines, Inc.
photocopy
Xerox
222
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
9/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
DDDD128
Xerox
Mines, Inc.
EEEE113
FFFF113
Xerox
Xerox
GGGG16
PCGG Lib
deposit/telegraphic transfer/
telex/ money transfer
SBTC debit tickets/
HHHH19
transmittal documents/
PCGG Lib
telexes
IIII15
PCGG Lib
JJJJ17
PCGG Lib
letters
SBTC debit tickets/
KKKK14
PCGG Lib
Trust documents
SBTC debit tickets/
LLLL14
PCGG Lib
Trust documents
SBTC debit tickets/
MMMM13
PCGG Lib
Trust documents
SBTC debit tickets/
NNNN13
PCGG Lib
Trust documents
SBTC debit tickets/
OOOO16
PCGG Lib
Trust documents
PPPP12
PCGG Lib
QQQQ12
PCGG Lib
RRRR12
SSSSSSSS2
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
223
PCGG Lib
documents
SBTC debit tickets/ money
UUUU14
PCGG Lib
documents
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
10/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
VVVV15
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
documents
ZZZZ to ZZZZ1
AAAAA13
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
DDDDD1
telegraphic transfer
EEEEE16
FFFFF15
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
transfer/ telex
IIIII16
PCGG Lib
224
JJJJJ13
KKKKK14
LLLLL14
MMMMM
111
NNNNN15
OOOOO16
PPPPP12
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
PCGG Lib
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
11/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
QQQQQ15
PCGG Lib
RRRRR110
PCGG Lib
SSSSS15
PCGG Lib
debit advise
Affidavit of Apolinario K.
TTTTT128
Xerox
UUUUU121
Xerox
Xerox
WWWWW1
Xerox
XXXXX to 1
Xerox
Xerox
225
ZZZZZ
Xerox
Xerox
Xerox
Xerox
Xerox
Xerox
Fe R. Gimenez Bankers
AAAAAA Trust Check #485 dated Dec.
13
BBBBBB
12
CCCCCC
12
for $810,005.00
Citibank, N.A. cashiers
check #38865 dated Nov. 22,
1983 for $810,000.00
FFFFFF13
Xerox
of KnoedlerModarco
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
12/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
GGGGGG126
Original
HHHHHH12
IIIIII to 1
Xerox
Xerox
$1,000,000.00
JJJJJJ to 1
KKKKKK13
Xerox
Xerox
$4,950,000.00
Hammer Galleries Invoice dated
LLLLLL12
Xerox
total $323,000.00
Bankers Trust Check #200 for
MMMMMM
13
Xerox
Gimenez
226
Xerox
Gallery Bleue
OOOOOO1
Xerox
Xerox
$480,015.79
Credit Suisse/ Palmy
QQQQQQ14
Foundation/ Debit
Xerox
Advice/$700,006
Credit Suisse/ Palmy
RRRRRR13
Foundation/ Debit
Xerox
Advice/$2,000,005.62
Certificate of the Swiss
SSSSSS
Xerox
Xerox
Grossman
List of documents numbered by
SSSSSS2
Xerox
Peter Cossandy
Letter dated Feb. 3, 1984 for
TTTTTT110
Xerox
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
13/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
Re: Glockhurst Corp.
UUUUUU1
Xerox
Xerox
XXXXXX13
YYYYYY13
Xerox
Xerox
Xerox
Xerox
of Php2,640,351.90
AAAAAAA
PCGG
1105
Lib
227
14/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
228
[16] Land Bank of the Philippines v. Court of Appeals, 456 Phil. 755 409 SCRA
455 (2003).
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
15/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
230
16/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
17/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
The fact that the documents were certified as true copies of the
original by the PCGG does not enhance its admissibility. These
documents have remained private even if it is in the custody of
the PCGG. What became public are not the private documents
(themselves) but the recording of it in the PCGG. For, while
public records kept in the Philippines, of private writings are also
public documents...the public writing is not the writing itself but
the public record thereof. Stated otherwise, if a private writing
itself is inserted officially into a public record, its record,
its recordation, or its incorporation into the public record
becomes a public document, but that does not make the
private writing itself a public document so as to make it
admissible without authentication.[25] (Citation omitted,
emphasis supplied.)
18/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
233
234
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
19/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
20/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
236
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
21/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
237
SSS
(two documents were
marked as
Exhibit SSS)
Investment and
Management Corporation
Corp.
238
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
22/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
239
240
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
23/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
241
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
24/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
242
243
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
25/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
244
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
26/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
245
246
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
27/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
247
248
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
28/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
249
250
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
29/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
251
252
_______________
[2] Rollo, pp. 87101.
253
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
30/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
Issue
Did the Sandiganbayan, in denying admission in
evidence to Exhibits MMM to AAAAAAA, commit grave
abuse of discretion?
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
31/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
Submission
Although I CONCUR with the result reached by the
ablywritten ponencia of the Chief Justice, I have to point
out that in dealing with offers of exhibits by the parties the
trial courts must be ever aware of the specific purpose or
purposes for which the exhibits are offered. I hold that such
purpose or purposes determine the rules of admissibility
that apply to the exhibits.
An exhibit that is offered may be a document, but its
being a document does not necessarily mean that its
admission must always rest on the rules on admissibility
governing documentary evidence. The decisive factor is the
purpose or purposes of the offer.
Let me clarify.
A.
The Best Evidence Rule does not apply
when the subject of inquiry is not
the contents of a document
Under the Best Evidence Rule, the original document
must be produced whenever its contents are the subject of
inquiry.
255
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
32/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
[5] G.R. No. 170604, September 2, 2013, 704 SCRA 465, 478479.
256
33/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
257
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
34/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
259
B.
Only a willful or badfaith refusal to comply
with a discovery order should warrant the
imposition of a harsh sanction under Rule 29
of the Rules of Court, like exclusion of evidence
I have to stress that the Republics nonproduction of the
documents during the discovery proceeding merited their
exclusion as evidence. To me, their exclusion as evidence, a
harsh sanction, should be applied only in extreme cases of
discovery abuse.
The primary basis for sanctions to be prescribed on
abuse of discovery or a refusal to comply with discovery
proceedings is Rule 29 of the Rules of Court. With respect
to the refusal to comply with an order to produce and allow
the inspection of a document issued under Rule 27 of the
Rules of Court, Section 3 of Rule 29 specifically provides as
follows:
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
35/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
36/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
[11] LitigationEnding Sanctions: Alaska Courts Use of Rule 37, 2 Alaska Law
Review 77, 81.
[12] G.R. No. 97654, November 14, 1994, 238 SCRA 88.
[13] Id., at p. 93.
[14] G.R. No. 164805, April 30, 2008, 553 SCRA 256, 271.
262
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
37/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
263
38/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
39/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
265
C.
To be admissible, private documents must be
authenticated and public documents must be
proved in accordance with pertinent provisions
of Rule 132 of the Rules of Court
The foregoing submissions notwithstanding, I humbly
submit that the Court rightly dismisses the petition for
certiorari on the ground that the Sandiganbayan did not
gravely abuse its discretion in refusing to admit the
documents offered by the Republic. To me, the
Sandiganbayan did not abuse its discretion, least of all
gravely, because the Republic did not comply with the
requirement of authentication of private documents as a
condition for their admission as evidence, and did not also
satisfy the requirement of presenting public documents as
evidence.
For purposes of their use as evidence in judicial
proceedings, documents are classified into private and
public. Rule 132 of the Rules of Court so specifies, viz.:
Section 19. Classes of Documents.For the purpose of their
presentation evidence, documents are either public or private.
Public documents are:
(a) The written official acts, or records of the official acts of
the sovereign authority, official bodies and tribunals, and public
officers, whether of the Philippines, or of a foreign country
(b) Documents acknowledge before a notary public except last
wills and testaments and
(c) Public records, kept in the Philippines, of private
documents required by law to be entered therein.
All other writings are private.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
40/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
[18] Salas v. Sta. Mesa Market Corporation, G.R. No. 157766, July 12, 2007,
527 SCRA 465, 471.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
41/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
and ZZZZZZ.
268
42/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
XXXXX
to
ZZZZZ,
CCCCCC,
LLLLLL
and
NNNNNN.
[27] Exhibits GGGGSSSSS, AAAAAA, DDDDDD to EEEEEE,
IIIIII,
KKKKKK,
MMMMMM,
OOOOOO
to
SSSSSS
and
UUUUUU to XXXXXX.
[28] Exhibit HHHHHH.
[29] Exhibit CCCC Rollo, p. 35.
269
43/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
270
44/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
271
45/46
1/24/2017
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME722
Copyright2017CentralBookSupply,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000159ce584279e8bcfb7b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
46/46