Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Appelfant,
V.
E*TRADE BANK,
....*m..a.,.w.m.3
. . . . ** .aI m
. . ,am
.
.....,....~~Ca..m...,.,..m.~m.~m..m~.
3-8
A OF
T SERVICE
E
........................................................
CERmCAm OF COMPLIANCE
~4
........................ ,,.............I...,......... 15
TABLE OF CITATIONS
CASES
...........................9.10
.
HenseheleSbebm Co. v. Hmry Schom. Inc., 302 202d 198 (Fla 4th DCA 1974)..9
d by entering the
Otder an Plaintiffs Motion for Judicd Default, the n o n - M order which is the
subject ofthis appeal, which granted an hpropdly requested default' and denied
the Defendants' Motion to Quash Substitute Service of Process and Dismiss this
Action which thereby e m n m l y dekmhed that the lower court had acquired
jurisdiction over the person of the Defendants and their prqmty- (App. A.) The
foregoing Order was rendered on December 31,2015. (Am. A.) The
this nan-final Order on February 1,2016. (See App. B, page 5 ofthe lower
tribunal's dock&) The facts pertinent ta this a
m are as fol~ows:
Secretary of State. (App. C,the Nutice ofFWg the Return of Service by counsel
Florida lhprtmmt of State,the Alias Summons, arrd the Complaint without the
exhiIbits wEch are not p d n e n t b this appeal.)
Ha. R Civ. Pro. 1.500Cc) provides, "A party may plead or othemise defend at
my time befure default is entered." Moreover, Florida"s appellate courts have
uniformly recognized that it is impper to enter a default when defensive mutiom
have been filed before entry ofa default. Pro-Art Dental v. V-SdrategicGroyp,
986 So.2d 2244, 1259 (Fla 2008). Therefore, it was improper for counsel for
E + W EBANK to set its Motion for Judicial Default to be heard at the same
time as the Defendants' Motions to Quash Substitute Service of Process.
Anended Complaint and that on June 22,201 5, the lower court granted leave to
file the Amended Complaint. (App. B,page 4.) The record does not show that any
attempt was made to serve process with the Amended Complaint on the Florida
Serretary of State or on any Defendants. (App. B,page 4-5.)
to be heard on August 18,2015. (App. B,page 4.) In the Plaintiffs Motion for
Judicial Default, comseI for E * W E BANK frivoI~us1yargued that a d e M t
BANK was well aware that the Defendants had not attended the hearing on
thatthe record showed that the Amended Complaint had not been personally
served a any Defendant or the Florida Secretary of State. (App. B,page 4.)
cancel the hearing on its Motion for Judicial Default (App. B, page 4.) However,
the lower court pperly reviewed the file and did not enter any ader granting a
default as a mult ofthe fimt hearing on EeTRADE BANK'S Motion fur Judicial
Defhult. (App. B3page 4.)
BANK had not filed m y return receipts showing d c e by certified don any
Defendant and that no affidavit of complimce had Been filed. (App. E.)
To date, the record of the lower court still shows .that counsel far E*TRADE
BANK has not filed any return receipts showing service by edified mil an any
Defendant and that no affidavit of compliance has been filed (App. B,pages 3-51
of
Process and Dismiss this Action to be heard at the same time. (App. F.) Note that
the Notice of Hearing does not give notice that the hearing is one at which
evidence will be taka. (App. F.) Also, note that inthe Notice ofHearing, counsel
for E*TI'U.DEBANK c d e d that he had "made a good faith effort to resolve the
foregoing issuesf' prior to noticing this hearing. (App. F.) H o m e r , counsel for
holiday season.
On December 29,2015,the lhfbndmt/Appe1.lantfiled his Amended Motion
d the
same to comet for E*TMDE BANK via fhcsimi!e and US. MaiI. (App. G.)
service by
and that no affidavit ofcompliance had been fled, snd it pointed out that the
original Complaint which was m e d on the Florida Secretary of State did not
contain the jurisdictional dlegatlons necessary to constitute the Sem@lafy of State
as agent fm substituted d
c e ofprocess.
B,pages 4-5.)
To dz&,
the recond ofthe lower court still shows that comse1for E*TRADE
BAMC has not filed any return receipts showing sentice by certifid mail m my
Defendant and that no affidavit of compIimce has been filed. (App. B,pages 3-5 .)
SW'MMARY OF ARGUMENT
Counsel for E*TRADE BANK failed in his attempt to invoke the lower
court's jurisdiction over the DefendantlAppdlant and his property by substitute
setvice of the Complaint on the Florida Secretary of State because the Complaint
for substitute
service and because counsel for E*TRADE BANK did not file any return receipts
showing s e ~ c by
e certified mail on any Defendant and did not file m y affidavit
ofcompliance. Therefore, the lower court erred by entering the Order an
v.
1084,1085
(Fla 4th Dek 2002) and AIwado v. Cisnems, 918 Sa.2d 585,588-89 (Fla. 36:
DCA 2006).
v. FirstR&&
Bersinass CmuItmt%,Inc., 338 S0.2d 561 (3%. 2d DCA 1979 andHe3fsckelS~a'natcCompany v. Hmry S c W , Inc.,302 So.Zd 198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). See
at 699.
Moreover*this Court has held that filing an amended complaint and simply
The f
attempted to invoke the lower court's jurisdiction over the Defendants and the
pmperty at issue by substitute service ofprocess pursuant to Florida Statutes 5
48.1 81 by serving Alias Summonses and copies of the Complaint on the Florida
However, the Complaint which was served on the Florida Secretay of State
makes no allegations about the residency of the DefedandAppeilmt, no
C,pages 4-6.) Therefore, the Complaint which was served on the Florida
Secretrny of State was insufficient to p v i d e the lower court with personal
page 4.) Howeverpcounsel for E*TRADE BANK failed to personally seme the
Amended Complaint an the MmdmdAppellmt or on the Florida Secretary of
State. (App. B,pages 4-5,)
DefendadAppellant and his property, and thesefore, this Court should enter an
order reversing the holding in the lower court9sQrdm on Plaintiffs Motim for
"If the plaintiff chooses substituted service on the Secretary of State under
Section 48.18 1(1), then perfection of such substituted service requires fuI1
mrnpZirmce with ane ofthe alternative methods provided by Section 48.1 61." P.S.
reqnirementr: (1) the plaintiff mnst send notfee of service and a eopy of the
process by registered or certified mail to the defendant; (2) the plaintiff most
file the defendeaPs retorn receipt; sad (3) the plaintiff most file an affidavit of
2002) citing Wyatt v. Ham, 649 So.2d 905,907-908 (Fia4th BCA 1995).
To date, the record ofthe lower court stiIX shows that counsel for E*TRADE
BANK has not filed any return receipts showing service by certified mail on any
Defendant and that no &davit of compliance has been filed (App. B,pages 3-5,)
As the record shows that come1 for E*TMDE BANK did not file any
retum recei*
any aEdavit ofcompliance, his actions did not provide the lower court with
personal jurisdiction over the DefmdantlAppellant and his property, and thenfore,
this Court should enter an order reversing the holding in the lower court's Order on
PfaintiFs Motion for Judicial Defhult which denied the Defendants' Mution t~
Quash Substime Service sfProcess and Dimiss this Action.
did not allege the jurisdictional rqukrnents prescribed by statute fbr substitute?
service and becam coumeZ for E*T'M.DEBANK did nat file any return receipts
showing senrice by certified mail on any Defendant and did not file any dEdavit
Motion fnQuash Substitute S d c e ofProcess and this Court should enter an order
reversing the holding in the lower court's M e r on Plaintiff's Motion for Judicial
Default which denied the DefmWAppe1ht7sMotion to Quash Substitute
S e ~ c of
e h e s s an8 Dimiss this Action.
CERTIF'ICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy hereof was served by U.S. Mail to
counsel for the Appellee, A L W S mELDS of KOPEIXWITZ OSTROW, at One
West Las Olas Blvd., Suite 500, Ft.Lauderdale, FL 33301; facsimile number 954-
Mark A, A h s
4129 Balington Dive
Vdrico, FL 33596
TeIephme: 8 13453-450
Mark A. A h s
4129 Bdhgton f i v e
Vafrim, Ft 33596
Telephone: 8 13-6534350
2D16-474
L.T. NU.: 09-614-028773
Appellant,
E"TRADE BANK,
Appellee.
Tab A
Tab C
Tab E
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that .a copy hereof and the attachments hereto were
served by U.S. Mail to counsel for the Appellee, ALEXIS FIELDS of
KOPELOWITZ OSTRQW, P.A., at One West Las Olas Blvd., Suite 500, Ft.
'+
Y{hy
April, 2016.
Mark A. Adams
4129 Balington Drive
Valrico, FL 33596
Telephone: 8 13-653-4350
of
Appendix A
0-
VS.
Defendants.
<
DONE AND ORDERED at the Chamber in Hillsborough County, Florida, this 30th
.-,! ,. , IS -0 CEZ7-'FYTHAT THE FCREOOING IS A TRUE
AM12 COnRFCT CGTY OF THE DOCUVchiT Obk FILE
Circuit Judge
Appendix B
http://pubrec10.hillsclerk.com/Unsecured/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=2388560
Skip to Main Content Logout My Account Search Menu New Civil Search Refine Search Back
CASE SUMMARY
CASE NO. 09-CA-028773
E*TRADE BANK vsWELLS FARGO BANK, N.A
Case Type:
Date Filed:
Location:
Judicial Officer:
Uniform Case Number:
Mortgage Foreclosure
11/17/2009
Division M
Div M, Senior Judge
292009CA028773A001HC
PARTY INFORMATION
Attorneys
Defendant
ADAMS, LISA S
Defendant
ADAMS, MARK A
Defendant
Defendant
Plaintiff
E*TRADE BANK
ROBERT L TANKEL
Retained
727-736-1901(W)
LEONARD TOWNSEND,
Esquire
Retained
561-613-8763(W)
DALE L FRIEDMAN
Retained
954-961-1400(W)
1 of 6
2/2/2016 7:29 PM
http://pubrec10.hillsclerk.com/Unsecured/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=2388560
2 of 6
2/2/2016 7:29 PM
http://pubrec10.hillsclerk.com/Unsecured/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=2388560
08/26/2013 NOTICE
OF TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE FOR THE IMPROPERLY ORDERED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 8/27/2013
@9:00AM
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
08/27/2013 MOTION FOR DEFAULT
BY COURT AGAINST MARK A. ADAMS AND LISA S. ADAMS
Party: HMC ASSETS,LLC SOLELY IN ITS CAPACITY AS SEPARATE TRUSTEE OF CAM X TRUST
09/04/2013 RESPONSE
TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANTS
Party: ADAMS, LISA S
09/04/2013 RESPONSE
TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANTS
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
10/08/2013 MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF PARTY
E TRADE BANK SHALL BE SUBSITUTUED FOR BAC HOME LOANS
Party: HMC ASSETS,LLC SOLELY IN ITS CAPACITY AS SEPARATE TRUSTEE OF CAM X TRUST
10/08/2013 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM NAME
THE LAW OFFICES OF MARSHALL C. WATSON, PA CHANGED TO CHOICE LEGAL GROUP, PA
10/08/2013 NOTICE
OF LEAD COUNSEL AND DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESS / AMELIA BERSON, ESQ
10/22/2013 ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF (Judicial Officer: Div M, Senior Judge )
PARTY PLAINTIFF - E*TRADE BANK SUBSTITUTED FOR BAC HOME LOANS - JRP 10/17/13
Date Signed: 10/17/2013
10/23/2013 MOTION TO - FOR
FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR PLTF
Party: E*TRADE BANK
09/30/2014 ORDER TO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL (Judicial Officer: Div M, Senior Judge )
KOPELOWITZ OSTROW PA SUBSTITUTED AS COUNSEL - JRP 09/24/14
Party:
E*TRADE BANK
Date Signed: 09/24/2014
12/01/2014 PROOF OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ACTION
Party:
ADAMS, LISA S
Party:
ADAMS, MARK A
Publish Date: 08/12/2010
12/03/2014 NOTICE OF HEARING
01/21/2015 11 AM MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE
12/12/2014 AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
1/21/15 @ 11 A.M.
01/20/2015 AMENDED MOTION TO - FOR
QUASH CONSTRUCTIVE SERVICE OF PROCESS AND DISMISS THIS ACTION
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
01/30/2015 EVIDENCE DATA SHEET
#11769
02/02/2015 ORDER ON
MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF PROCESS, VACATE ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND MOTION TO
DISMISS - MOTION IS SET FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON 02/17/15 @1:30PM CR 500 - ST 01/29/15
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
02/03/2015 NOTICE OF HEARING
EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON 02/17/15 AT 1:30 PM
02/17/2015 ORDER ON - TO - FOR (Judicial Officer: Div M, Senior Judge )
ORDER ON DEFENDANT MARK A. ADAMS' AMENDED MOTION TO SQUASH CONTRUCTIVE SERVICE OF PROCESS AND DISMISS
ACTION. 1. GRANTED. 2. PLAINTIFF'S ORE TENUS MOTION FOR EXTENSIONOF TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANT IS GRANTED.
PLAINTIFF HAS ONE HUNDRED TWENTY (120) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE. JUDGE S.TAYLOR
02/17/2015
Date Signed: 02/17/2015
02/18/2015 E-FILED REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED
02/18/2015 E-FILED REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED
02/19/2015 E-FILED PLURIES 20 DAYS SUMMONS ISSUED
X2 STEIN@KOLAWYERS.COM
03/16/2015 E-FILED REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED
03/16/2015 E-FILED REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED
03/16/2015 E-FILED ALIAS 20 DAYS SUMMONS ISSUED
X2 STEIN@KOLAWYERS.COM
03/17/2015 NOTICE OF HEARING
05/29/15 @9AM CR 500
03/18/2015 AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
OF 05/29/15 AT 9:00 AM
03/24/2015 NOTICE OF FILING
RETURN OF SERVICE ON LISA ADAMS AND MARK ADAMS
03/24/2015 SUMMONS RETURNED SERVED
3/18/15
Party:
ADAMS, MARK A
Date Served: 03/18/2015
03/24/2015 SUMMONS RETURNED SERVED
3/18/15
Party:
ADAMS, LISA S
Date Served: 03/18/2015
03/27/2015 NOTICE OF FILING
AFFIDAVITS OF EVASION
3 of 6
2/2/2016 7:29 PM
http://pubrec10.hillsclerk.com/Unsecured/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=2388560
03/27/2015 AFFIDAVIT
OF EVASION FOR LISA S. ADAMS
03/27/2015 AFFIDAVIT
OF EVASION FOR MARK A. ADAMS
03/30/2015 SUMMONS RETURNED SERVED
LISA ADAMS ON MARCH 18, 2015
03/30/2015 SUMMONS RETURNED SERVED
MARK ADAMS ON 3/18/15
04/03/2015 COPY OF
AFFT OF EVASION FOR MARK A. ADAMS RTN'D NON-SERVED
04/03/2015 COPY OF
AFFT OF EVASION FOR LIDA S. ADAMS RTN'D NON-SERVED
04/07/2015 MOTION TO - FOR
ENLARGE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
Party: ADAMS, LISA S
04/07/2015 MOTION TO - FOR
ENLARGE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
04/08/2015 NOTICE OF HEARING
DATE: APRIL 29,2015 TIME: 11:00A.M.
04/22/2015 NOTICE OF FILING
CORRESPONDENCE FROM DEFENDANT, MARK ADAMS
04/22/2015 CORRESPONDENCE
FROM DEFENDANT, MARK ADAMS
04/27/2015 NOTICE OF CANCELLING HEARING
APRIL 29, 2015 HEARING HAS BEEN CANCELLED.
05/11/2015 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
FOR FORECLOSURE
Party: E*TRADE BANK
05/12/2015 NOTICE OF HEARING
05/29/15 @ 9:00AM CTRM 513 PLTFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORECLOSURE
05/12/2015 NOTICE OF CANCELLING HEARING
05/29/15 @ 9:00AM
05/18/2015 NOTICE OF HEARING
JUNE 22, 2015, ROOM 513
05/19/2015 ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
Party: BUCKHORN PRESERVE HOA INC
05/21/2015 MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
TO SERVE DEFENDANTS
Party: E*TRADE BANK
06/17/2015 AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
06/22/2015 9 AM
06/22/2015 ORDER ON
PAINITFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANT'S....GRANTED.......06/22/15 ST
Party: E*TRADE BANK
06/22/2015 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO - FOR (Judicial Officer: Div M, Senior Judge )
TO FILE VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORECLOSURE.......GRANTED..........06/22/15 ST
Party:
E*TRADE BANK
Date Signed: 06/22/2015
07/07/2015 MOTION FOR DEFAULT
BY JUDICIAL AGAINST MARK A ADAMS AND LISA ADAMS
Party: E*TRADE BANK
07/07/2015 NOTICE OF HEARING
8/18/15 @ 9AM - ROOM 500
08/17/2015 NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC HEARING
Party: ADAMS, LISA S
08/17/2015 RESPONSE
TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR JUDICIAL DEFAULT
Party: ADAMS, LISA S
08/17/2015 MOTION TO QUASH
SUBSTITUTE SERVICE OF PROCESS AND DISMISS THIS ACTION
Party: ADAMS, LISA S
08/17/2015 NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC HEARING
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
08/17/2015 RESPONSE
TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR JUDICIAL DEFAULT
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
08/17/2015 MOTION TO QUASH
SUBSTITUTE SERVICE OF PROCESS AND DISMISS THIS ACTION
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
10/27/2015 NOTICE OF HEARING
12/30/2015 10 AM
12/29/2015 AMENDED
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL DEFAULT
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
12/29/2015 AMENDED MOTION TO - FOR
TO QUASH SUBSTITURE SERVICE OF PROCESS AND DISMISS THIS ACTION
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
4 of 6
2/2/2016 7:29 PM
http://pubrec10.hillsclerk.com/Unsecured/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=2388560
12/29/2015 NOTICE
OF TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE FOR THE HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 12/30/15 @10:00 AM
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
12/29/2015 NOTICE
OF TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE FOR THE HEARING SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 30,2015 @ 10:00 AM
Party: ADAMS, LISA S
12/29/2015 AMENDED MOTION TO - FOR
TO QUASH SUBSTITUTE OF PROCESS AND DISMISS THIS ACTION
Party: ADAMS, LISA S
12/29/2015 AMENDED
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL DEFAULT
Party: ADAMS, LISA S
12/31/2015 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO - FOR (Judicial Officer: Div M, Senior Judge )
JUDICIAL DEFAULT GRANTED.......DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO QUASH SUBSTITTUE SERVICE AND DISMISS ACTION IS
DENIED.....12/30/15 ST
Party:
E*TRADE BANK
Date Signed: 12/30/2015
01/08/2016 NOTICE OF DROPPING PARTY(S)
01/08/2016 MOTION FOR DEFAULT
JUDICIAL
Party: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A
01/12/2016 EVIDENCE DATA SHEET
PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT LIST #12140
01/19/2016 MOTION AND ORDER
FOR DEFAULT
Party: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A
01/20/2016 NOTICE OF FILING
TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING ON JANUARY 21,2015-TRANSCRIPT ATTACHED
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
01/20/2016 NOTICE OF FILING
RELEASE OF MORTGAGE BY WELL FARGO BANK NA-COPY OF RELEASE OF MORTGAGE ATTACHED
Party: ADAMS, MARK A
02/01/2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Transaction Assessment
CASH payment
Transaction Assessment
CASH payment
Transaction Assessment
Transaction Assessment
Transaction Assessment
CASH payment
130.00
130.00
0.00
Receipt # 60-00022266
ADAMS, MARK A
Receipt # 60-00044857
ADAMS, MARK A
Receipt # 60-00045477
ADAMS, MARK A
Transaction Assessment
ACH Payment
Transaction Assessment
ACH Payment
40.00
40.00
0.00
Receipt # 21-00114603
Receipt # 21-00119396
Plaintiff HMC ASSETS,LLC SOLELY IN ITS CAPACITY AS SEPARATE TRUSTEE OF CAM X TRUST
Total Financial Assessment
Total Payments and Credits
Balance Due as of 02/02/2016
11/10/2009
11/10/2009
11/10/2009
11/10/2009
11/10/2009
11/10/2009
11/10/2009
11/10/2009
11/10/2009
11/17/2009
5 of 6
Transaction Assessment
Transaction Assessment
Transaction Assessment
Transaction Assessment
Transaction Assessment
Transaction Assessment
Transaction Assessment
Transaction Assessment
Transaction Assessment
Transaction Assessment
3.00
(3.00)
5.00
(5.00)
105.00
5.00
12.00
(122.00)
20.00
(20.00)
20.00
(20.00)
1,005.00
1,005.00
0.00
1.00
0.50
3.50
1.50
3.50
80.00
15.00
685.00
115.00
50.00
2/2/2016 7:29 PM
http://pubrec10.hillsclerk.com/Unsecured/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=2388560
11/17/2009
04/16/2010
04/16/2010
08/20/2013
08/20/2013
Mail in payment
Transaction Assessment
Mail in payment
Transaction Assessment
ACH Payment
Receipt # 1701769
Receipt # 1802443
Receipt # 21-00021301
Amelia Berson
(955.00)
30.00
(30.00)
20.00
(20.00)
Unofficial Record
6 of 6
2/2/2016 7:29 PM
Appendix C
NOTICE OF FILING
The Plaintiff, E*TRADE BANK, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, by and
through its undersigned counsel, herein files the Return of Service on LlSA ADAMS and
MARK ADAMS.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sewed by
Electronic Mail on 24th day of March to: Robert L. Tankel, Esquire, Attorney for
Beckhorn Preserve HOA, 1022 Main Street, Suite D, Dunedin, Florida 34698, and
mailed to Mark A. Adams and Lisa S. Adams, 4129 Balington Drive, Valrico, Florida
33594; Wells Fargo Bank, N A., c/o 101 North Phillips Ave, Sioux Falls, SD 57104 and
Current Resident 4129 Balington Drive, Valrico, Florida 33594.
Respectfully submitted,
KOPELOWITZ OSTROW P.A.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
200 SW 1st Avenue, 12th Floor
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Stein@kolawyers.com
Pursuant to Chapter 48.181, Florida Statutes, a copy of the process and initial
pleading, case number 2009-28773, was accepted for MARK ADAMS, and was
filed on March 18, 2015, at 02:OO PM.
E*TRADE BANK,
-:,, ,.
-,:~.
"
>~3
co
-,-
..~
1 :
,-.,,,,
.,
-0
-A-
'0
'
E*TRADE BANK,
*,,.,
cii
'i,.>
Plaintiff,
vs .
MARK A. ADAMS; BUCKHORN PRESERVE
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS, ING.;
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; LISA S. ADAMS;
UNKNOWN TENANT(S), IN POSSESSION
OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY,
Defendants.
C,
yfiq:ti,
$3im
m4
I
ALIAS SUMMONS
THE STATE OF FLORIDA:
To Each SherifflCertified Process Server of the State:
YOU ARE COMMANDED to serve this summons and a copy of the Complaint, in
this action on Defendant:
MARK ADAMS
By Serving: Florida Secretary of State
Pursuant to F.S. 48.181
2661 Executive Center Circle, W.
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Each Defendant is required to serve written defenses to the complaint or petition
on CRAIG B. STEIN, ESQUIRE, KOPELOWITZ OSTROW P.A., 200 S.W. IS'
AVENUE, SUITE 1200, FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301, within twentv 1201 davs
after service of this summons on that Defendant, exclusive of the date of service, and to
file the original of the defenses with the Clerk of this Court either before service on
Plaintiffs attorney or immediately thereafter. If a Defendant fails to do so, a default will
be entered against that Defendant for the relief demanded in the complaint or petition.
Dated this
day of
MARCH
,2015.
PAT FRANK
As Clerk of the Court
By:
As Deputy Clerk
69 28773
A. ADAMS;
BUCKHORN
PRESERVE
HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.; WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A.; LISA S. ADAMS; IN
POSSESSION OF THE
SUBJECT
PROPERTY,
Defendants.
MARK
COMPLAINT
COUNT
1.
2.
On August 29,2003, MARK A. ADAMS AND LISA S. ADAMS exccuted and delivered a
promissory note and Purchase Money Mortgage securingpayment o f the same to MORTGAGE
Lr,
ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, AS A NOMWEE FOR
<:.
U3
E-&,
.. .
. i;.
C;j
=
INC., which mottgage was recorded in the Official Records Book 13040, Page 245, of
Li..
dpfzibed therein, then owned by and in possession of said mortgagor. Said mortgage was
2
..,-
C7
.,- !14@ME
LOANS SERVICING, LP. A copy of the note, issignmcnt md mortgage are altached
J -L
.,.,.,c
.<-
1:
.*-
---
u,
, : : ,<
.T
,J
5.
?here has been a deiiulr under the note and mortgage held by Plai~~tiffin
chat the payment due
January 01, 2009 and all subsequent payments have not been made. Plaintiffdeclares the full
aniounr due under the note and inongage to he now due.
6.
All conditions precedent to the filing of this action has been performed or has occurred.
7.
There is now due, owing and unpaid to the Plaintiff as of the date of the filing ofthis complaint
the following amounts on principal of said note and mortgage: unpaid principal
balance: $167,991.94, plus interest, escrow, title search expenses for ascertaining necessary
parties to this suit, title search, title exam, filing fee, and attorneys fees and costs.
8.
Plaintiff has obligated itself to pay the undersigned attorneys a reasonable fee for their services
herein, Pursuant to the loan documents Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorneys fees.
9.
10.
The Defendant, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. may claim some interest in or lienypon the
%'
'"...
Book 14920, Page 1040 of the Public Records ofHVLSBOROUGH Cuuoky. ~ a -.i d & i., ~, ~ s tI ,j ~ ~ ,
.
.r
,:,. .
The Defendant, BUCKHORN PRESERVE HOMEOWNF,RS ASSOCIATION?p'f2. ;m
:
,. :-:.
" 7
---
claim some interest in or lien upon the suhject property by virtue of Any Assess
to FL Statute 720.3085.
(a,) That this Court will take jurisdiction of this cause, the suhject matter and the partics hereto.
(h.)
That this Court ascertain and determine the sums of money due and payable to the YlaintifIfrom
the Defendant(s), including withoi~tlimitation principal, interest, advances, attorney fees, and
costs pursuant to the loan documents.
(c.)
That the sum of money found to he due as aforesaid be decreed by this Court to he a lien upon the
lands described in Plaintiffs mortgage.
(d.) That such lien be foreclosed in accordance with the rules and established practice o f this Court,
and upon hilure of the Defendants to pay the amount of money found to be due by them to the
Plaintiff, the said land be sold to satisiy said lien.
(e.)
That this Court decree that the lien of the Plaintiff is superior to any and all right, title or interest
ofthe Defendants herein or any person or parties claiming by, rhrough or under them since the
institution of this suit.
(f)
That all rizht, title or interest of t1:e Defendants or any person claiming by, through 01.under them
be forever barred and foreclosed.
//
,.,.",,
..
'
-.,,,"."
(g.) That this Court grants general relief in this cause as in its discretion might be just and proper
including, but not limited to, a deficiency judgment, except where a discharge is applicable, if the
Green, Esq.
Appendix D
On June 22, 2015, this Court granted the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to file
Verified Amended Complaint, and deeming it filed as of the entry of the Order
2.
The Defendants' have failed to comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure
other applicable law, Plaintiff is entitled to entry of judicial default against the
Defendants, MARK A. ADAMS and LlSA ADAMS, for failure to file a responsive
pleading to the Plaintiffs Verified Amended Complaint
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by
Electronic Mail on 7'h day of July to: Robert L. Tankel, Esquire, Attorney for Beckhorn
Preserve HOA, 1022 Main Street, Suite D, Dunedin, Florida 34698, and mailed to Mark
A. Adams and Lisa S. Adams, 4129 Balington Drive, Valrico, Florida 33594; Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., c/o 101 North Phillips Ave, Sioux Falls, SD 57104 and Current
Resident 4129 Balington Drive, Valrico, Florida 33594.
Respectfully submitted,
KOPELOWITZ OSTROW
FERGUSON WEISELBERG
Attorneys for Plaintiff
200 SW 1st Avenue, 12th Floor
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Telephone No.: (954) 525-4100
Facsimile No.: (954) 525-4300
Appendix E
E*TRADE BANK,
DMSION: M
Plaintiff,
Defendants.
Almost two years after the undersigned notified new counseI for the new Plaintiff,
satisfaction ofthe note and mortgage at issue in this action, the m t d shows that on
March 1 8,2015, counsel for the Plaintiff attempted to invoke this Coutrt's juridiction
over the Defendants and the property at issue by substitute senice of process p w m t to
the Florida Secretary of State. The record also shows that the Plaintiff Bas not Sded
any return receipts showhg service by certified mail on m y Defendant and that no
"If the plaintiff chooses substituted service on the Secretary of State under Section
48.1 8 1(I), then perfection of such substituted senrice requires full compliance with one
of the alternative methods provided by Section 48,161 ." P.S. R. Associates v. ArtmapHedh, 364 %.2d 855,857 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
3.
"Because the tack ofpersonal service of process implicates due process concerns, the
plaintiff must strictly comply with the statutory requirements." Smith v. Leamm, 826
50.2d 1077,1078 (Fh2d DCA 2002).
4.
"Section 48.16 1, which allow3 for substituted service of process on a Florida resident
who is concealing his whereabouts, creates an exception to the general rule that the
defendant must be personally m e d , The statute contains three requirements: (1) the
phhtiff must send notice of service and a copy of the process by registered or
certified mail to the defendant; (2) the plaintiff mugt file the defendmi's return
receipt; and (3) the plaintiff must file m affidavit of wmplimce."Id. (Emphasis
added.)
5.
"The court cannot pmeed in a matter until proper proof of valid service is made." Reemployment Sewices, Lbd. v. National Loan Acquisition Company, 969 S0.2d 467,47 1 (
Fb.5th DCA 2007) citing fixenski v. f l ~ k r t y 1, 11 6 So.2d 767,768-69 (Ha.1 959) and
Hemy P.Trawick, Jr., Horiab Practice and Procedure, 4 8:20 (2007 ed.). When the
record shows defective service of process, the court does not have jurisdiction to proceed.
id.
6.
A judge should take notice of facts which show a lack of jurisdiction, and when a judge
acts witbout jurisdiction, the judge proceeds at his or her peril a d is personally liable for
the h g e s flowing fmm such acts. Fmisk v. Smuot, 58 So2d 534,53 7-538 ma.
1952).
As the recod shows that no return receipts and no affidavit of compliance have been
7.
fiIed by the Plaintiff to date, the Plaintiffs attempt to invoke this Court's jurisdiction
over the Defendants and the property at issue by substime service on the Florida
Secretsry of State should be quashed.
Furthermore, as the Plaintiff has failed to take the mandatory steps to perfect service after
8.
this Court has g a n d it two atensions of t h e to do so, this action should be dismissed.
WEEREFOlXF+the Defendant, MARK A, ADAMS, respectfully requests that this
Honorable Court take notice that it does not have jurisdiction over the property at issue and does
not have jurisdiction over .the Defendants, MARK. A. ADAMS and LISA S. ADAMS,quash the
CERTZETCATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy hereof was sewed by facsimile and US.Mail t~
counsel fur the Plaintiff and its servicer,CRAIG B. STEIN of KOPELOWTZ OSTROW, P.A.,
at 200 S.W. 1st Avenue, Suite 1200, Ft. Lauderdde, FL 33301; facsimile number 954-525-4300;
&&
onthis
17 ~ y o f ~ ~ g u s t , 2 0 1 5 .
Valrico, FL 33596
Telephone: 813-6534350
Appendix F
Plaintiff,
vs,
MARK A. ADAMS; BUCKHORN PRESERVE
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS, INC.;
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; LISA S. ADAMS;
UNKNOWN TENANT(S), IN POSSESSION
OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY,
Defendants.
TIME:
10:OO a.m.
JUDGE:
Presiding Judge
PLACE:
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that prior to noticing this hearing the undersigned has
made a good faith effort to resolve the foregoing issues with opposing counsel.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order
to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision
of certain assistance. Please contact the Court Administrators ADA Coordinator
within two (2) working days of your receipt of this notice. Ifyou are hearing or voice
impaired, call the Florida Relay Service at (800) 955-8711 (TTY), or (800) 955-8770
(Voice).
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by
Electronic Mail on 27thday of October, 2015 to: Robert 1. Tankel, Esquire, Attorney for
Beckhorn Preserve HOA, 1022 Main Street, Suite D, Dunedin, Florida 34698,
4129 Balington Drive, Valrico, Florida 33596; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., c/o 701 North
t
Phillips Ave, Sioux Falls, SD 57104 and Current Resident 41 29 Balington Drive, Valrico,
Florida 33596.
RespectFully submitted,
KOPELOWITZ OSTROW
FERGUSON WEISELBERG GILBERT, ?.A.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
200 SW 1st Avenue, 12th Floor
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301
By:
CRAIG
B'ETT STEIN
I
la, B& No.: 0420464
s~~n@kolawyers,com
/ALEXIS FIELDS
Fla. Bar No.: 95953
fields@,koIawvers.com
Appendix G
CASE NO.:09-CA-028773
DIVISION: M
E*TMDE BANK,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARK A. ADAMS et al.,
Defendants.
Almost two years after the undersigned notified new counsel for the new Plaintiff,
CRAIG B.STEIN of KOPELOWTZ OSTROW, PA.,that the original Plaintiffs
satisfaction of the note and mortgage at issue in this action, and therefore, that this action
is a frivolous attempt to collect a non-existent debt, the record shows that on March 18,
2015, counsel for the Plaintiff attempted to invoke this Court's jurisdiction over the
Defendants and the property at issue by substitute senrice of process pursuant to Florida
Statutes 4 48.18 1 by sewing Alias S u m m o m and copies of the Complaint on the
However, the record shows that no return receipts and no affidavit of compliance have
been filed by the Plaintiff to date and that the original Complaint which was served on the
Florida Secretary of State does not contain the jurisdictional allegations necessary to
constitute the Secretary of State as agent for substituted service of process, and therefore,
the Plaintiff has failed in its aztempt to invoke this Court's jurisdiction over the
Defendants and the property at issue by substitute service on the Florida Secretary of
State and the motion to quash should be granted for the reasons shown i n k
3.
"The court cannot proceed in a m a t h until proper proof of valid service is made." Reemp!oyment Services, Dd. v. National Lorn Acqtcifl'tionCompny, 969 So.2d 467,47 1
(Fla. 5th DCA 2007) citing KEosemki v- Hahero, 116 So.2d767,768-69(Fla.1959) and
Henry P. Trawick, Jr., Florih Practice and Procedure, $8:20 (2007 ed.). When the
record shows defective d c e of process, the court does nut have jurisdiction to proceed.
Id.
4.
"Becam the lack ofp a s o d service of process implicates due process concerns, the
plaintiff must strictly m p l y with the statutory requirements." Smith v. Leamapa, 826
A judge should take notice offacts which show a lack of jurisdiction, and when njudge
acts without jurisdiction, the judge p r o d s at his or her peril and is personally liable for
the damages flowing from such acts. Fdsk v. Snoot, 58 So.2d 534,537-538 (Fla.
1952).
6.
"To support substituted service of process on a defendant, the complaint must allege the
jurisdictional requirements prescribed by statute. If it failsto do so, then a motion to
quash process and service of process should be granted."Drah v. &hwIm, 353 So.2d
%1,964 PIEL
2d DCA 1978) citing Esberger v. First Florida Business Cu12sdtmts, Inc.,
338 So.2d 561 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976) and HmchelSteinau Company v. Hany Schorr,
Inc., 302 So.2d 198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). See also, Alvarado v. Cisneros, 919 So2d 5 85
(FIa. 3d DCA 2006) and Ferguson v. Mc William,483 So.2d 509 (Fk 4th DCA 1986).
7.
Filing an amended complaint and delivering it to the defendants after sewing: a complaint
without the required jurisdictional allegations on the Florida Secretary of State does NOT
The record shows that the Amended Complaint was not filed until May 11,2015, nearly
two months after service of the original Complaint on the Secretary of State, and that the
Amended Complaint has not been served on the Florida Secretary of State. Moreover,
the record shows that the original Complaint which was served on the Florida Secretary
of State does not contain the jurisdictional allegations necessary to constitute the
Secretary of State as agent for substituted senice of process. Therefore, the Plaintiff has
failed in its attempt to invoke this Court's jurisdiction over the Defendants and the
property at issue by substitute service on the Florida Secretary of State, and this motion to
quash should be granted because the Court does not have jurisdiction over the Defendants
or the property at issue in this frivofous attempt to collect a non-existent debt,
9.
Moreever, even if the Plaintiff had served the Amended Complaint with the required
jurisdictional allegations on the Florida Secretary of State, it has still failed to take the
actions necessary to invoke this Court" jjuridiction over the Defendants and the property
at issue as shown i n h
10.
"If the plaintiff chooses substituted service on the Secretary of State under Section
48.1 8 1(I), then perfection of mch substituted service requires full compliance with one
of the dternative methods provided by Section 48.161 ." P.S. R Assmiares v. ArtmMHeath, 364 So.2d 855,857 CfiJsl. 2d DCA 1978).
11.
"Section 48.161, which allows for substituted service of process on a Florida resident
who is concealing his whereabouts, mates an exception to the general rule that the
defendant must be personalty served. The statute contains three requimmenta: (1) the
phintiff mast send notice of service and a copy of the p m ~ bys registered or
certified mail to the defendmG (2) the plaintiff must file the defendant's return
receipt; and (3) the plaintiff must file an affidavit of compliance."Smith v. haman,
826 So.2d 1077,1078 Fla. 2d DCA 2002). (Emphasis added)
12.
However, the record shows that the Plaintiff has not fded any return receipts showing
service by certified mail on any Defendant and h t no affidavit of compliance has been
filed to date, and therefore, as proper proof of valid senrice has NOT been made, this
Court does NOT have jurisdiction aver the Defendants or the property at issue and the
13.
filed by the Plaintiff to date and that the original Complaint which was served on the
Florida Secretary of State does not contain the jurisdictional allegations nwessary to
constitute the Secretary of State as agent for substituted service of process, the Plaintiff
has failed in its attempt to invoke this Cowt's jwisdiciion over the Defendants and the
pmperty at issue by substitute service on the Florida Secretary of State and this motion to
Furthermore, as the Plaintiff has failed to take the mandatory steps to perfect senice after
this Court kas granted it two extensions of time to do so, this action should be dismissed.
Honorable Court take notice that it does not have jurisdiction over the property at issue and does
not h v e jurisdiction over the Defendants, quash the Plaintiffs afAempt at substitute service of
process, and dismiss this action.
CERTXFXCAm OF SERVICE
The undersigned d e s that a copy hereof was served by facsimile and U.S. Mail to
counsel for the Plaintiff and its serviw, C M G B. STEJN of KOPELOWITZ OSTROW, PA.,
at 200 S W. 1st Avenue, Suite 1200, Ft.huderdale, FL 33 301 ;facsimile number 954-525-4300;
.,--b63