TH - English PDF

5&$)/*$"-)"/%#00,
5IFJOTUBMMBUJPOPGHSPVOEQIPUPWPMUBJDQMBOUTPWFSNBSHJOBM
BSFBT

06SIN",//-0ROJECT !NEWCHALLENGEFORLANDVALORISATIONWITHINASTRATEGICECO SUSTAINABLE
APPROACHTOLOCALDEVELOPMENT

TECHNICAL HANDBOOK
The installation of on-ground photovoltaic plants over marginal areas
PVs in BLOOM Project - A new challenge for land valorisation within a strategic eco-sustainable
approach to local development
G. Nofuentes, J. V. Muoz, D. L. Talavera, J. Aguilera and J. Terrados

INDEX
1. PV Grid-Connected Systems Basics

1.1. Overview
1.2. DC Part (PV modules, cabling, DC connection boxes, DC
switches)
1.3. AC Part (Inverter & energy meters)
1.4. Metal works and protective elements (earth electrode,
voltage surge arrestors, fuses, etc.)
1.5. Some electric characteristics of a typical 1-MWp PVPP
BRIEF SUMMARY OF SECTION 1
2. Estimating The Annual Energy Produced by a PV Grid-Connected

System
2.1. Assessment on The Solar Resource of the Site (Available
insolation data sources: ground-based measurements and
satellite-derived data)
2.2. Estimating The Annual Electricity Yield of a PV Grid-
Connected System
3. Sizing PV Grid-Connected Systems

3.1. Choosing the PV module
3.2. Sizing the nominal power of the PV generator
3.3. Sizing the nominal power of the inverter
3.4. Sizing the number of modules
3.5. Sizing the number of series connected modules
3.6. Sizing the number of parallel connected
3.7. Sizing the cabling
3.8. Sizing protective measurements (fuses, voltage surge
arrestors, DC main switch, etc.)
2
3.9. Some characteristic data concerning implemented PVPPs
APPENDIX OF SECTION 3: TERMINOLOGY
4. Matching PVPP Typologies to Specific Terrains

5. Economic Assessment on PV Grid-Connected Systems

5.1. Representative figures of the cost of PVGCS in some
countries
5.2. Existing supporting measures for PVPPs in each partner
country
5.3. Easy-to-use tables to estimate the IRR
5.4. Review of the most meaningful and understandable
profitability indices: the internal rate of return (IRR)
5.5. Easy-to-use tables to estimate the IRR
5.6. Short review of the taxation impact
APPENDIX I OF SECTION 5. TABLES ADDRESSED TO ESTIMATE

THE IRR
APPENDIX II OF SECTION 5: TERMINOLOGY
Appendix: Main technical and contractual points to be checked and

compared when examining a proposal from an EPC supplier by a
prospective owner
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
3
1. PV Grid-Connected Systems Basics
1.1 Overview
Photovoltaic (PV) technology converts sunlight into electricity using solid state devices
named PV modules. Such way to produce energy has experienced during the last years
one of the most formidable growths in the renewable energy industry, as shown in
figure 1.1.
Figure 1.1. World evolution of the number of photovoltaic cells production. The increase of MW
produced has followed an exponential trend (source: EurObsev'ER 2008).
4
PV systems may be grouped into stand-alone systems (SAPV) and grid-connected
systems (PVGCS). Basically the first one used the electricity produced to self-
comsuption while the second one the energy is sold through the electricity grid. Taking
into account the characteristics of the PV in Bloom project, the PV stand-alone systems
falls out of the scope of analysis of this paper, for this reason we are going to focus on
PVGCS. In this kind of PV systems all energy generated is fed into the company
electricity grid. In fact, the company plays the role of a huge energy store: in developed
countries, most PV systems are connected to the grid. In principle, this point makes
PVGCS simpler than SAPV mainly because it is not necessary to store any energy.
The reason of feeding all the energy PVGCS generates is related to the generous
existing feed-in tariffs, by which PV-generated electricity is sold to the grid at prices
well above the market. Further, the number of these systems has grown sharply
worldwide. This development has been brought mainly by means of a continuous
decrease trend in PV costs together with a wide variety of supporting policies that
diferent countries have launched (e.g.: Germany, Spain and Italy).
These strategies or policies are implemented with financial incentives, such as granting
a subsidy per kWp of installed capacity or a payment per kWh produced and sold -these
concepts will be explained in more depth in section 5 In other words, these financial
incentives broadly fall into generation-based (mainly implemented through generous
feed-in tariffs) and investment-focused (initial investment subsidies or rebates, low-
interest loans) ones. The latter incentives are being progressively phased out by
governmental bodies.
After this short approach to PVGCS a more in-depth study is to be accomplished

hereafter, dealing with the elements of these systems and how they work.
1.2 . Parts of PV Grid-Connected Systems

A simplified layout of a grid-connected PV system is shown in figure 1.2. The
system usually comprises the following elements:
1. PV modules, usually termed PV generator (some PV modules connected in

series or parallel on a supporting structure)
5
2. Inverter (a solid-state based device that converts DC electricity from the
modules into AC electricity with the same characteristic as that supplied by the
grid)
3. Metering device intended to measure the electricity sold to the grid
4. Metering device intended to measure the electricity bought from the grid
5. AC loads from electrical appliances
The first PVGCS were often mounted on private family building roofs using the
above scheme. Nowadays, these systems are increasingly being installed on apartment
blocks, schools, agricultural and industrial buildings, etc. Additionally, where generous
feed-in-tariffs are available, the scheme shown in figure 1.2 has been abandoned and
replaced by the more advantageous one shown in figure 1.3. The latter allows the owner
of the system to sell the generated electricity in its entirety to the grid. This beneficial
layout has paved the way for energy utilities, operating companies and investment
companies to deploy large-size PVGCS mounted on ground. In addition, especially in
sunny sites, sun tracking systems have proven profitable, given the favourable financial
support mentioned above.
(1)
(2)
(5)
(3) (4)
(5) AC Loads
= 245,7 457,3
Electricity
~ kWh kWh
grid
(1) PV modules (2) Inverter (3) Metering device (4) Metering device
(Electricty sold to (Electricity bought
the grid) from the grid)
6
Figure 1.2. Simplified layout of a grid-connected PV system.
PV-generated electricity is partly sold to the grid
= 245,7
Electricity
~ kWh
grid
(1) PV modules (2) Inverter (3) Metering device

(Electricty sold to
the grid)
Figure 1.3. Simplified layout of a grid-connected PV system.

All the PV-generated electricity is sold to the grid
If the characteristics of electricity are taken into account, the diagram shown in figure
1.3 can be broadly divided in two parts.
DC PART: from the PV generator to the inverter input, the main characteristic in
this part is that the electricity is delivered as DC current. In this part PV modules,
supporting structures, wires and DC connection boxes are included.
AC PART: from inverter to public electricity grid, in this part the electricity is
delivered as AC current. In this part are included the following elements: inverter,
wires,protective elements and a metering device intended to measure the electricity
sold to the grid
.
7
This division is useful when a PVGCS and its constitutive elements are described.
Nevertheless there is a key element of grid connected systems which is related to the
DC and the AC parts; namely, metal works and earth electrode. Such elements are
elements of the safety system of PVGCS and are intended to protect against electrical
shocks.
1.2.1 DC Part
PV Modules, wires and connection boxes are the main elements that can be found in the
DC part. The DC character of current and operation of modules pose many questions
and new situations for novel electrical workers who are used to handling AC current.
1.2.1.1. PV Modules
PV modules are probably one of the most important elements of PVGCS, when the PV
modules are connected in serial and/or parallel configurations obtaining a PV generator.
At the same time, modules are made by connecting photovoltaic solar cells, which are
connected in series and parallel, to obtain higher current and voltage. To protect the
cells against mechanical stress, weathering and humidity, the cells are embedded in a
transparent material that also isolates the cells electrically. In most cases, glass is used
but depending on the process it is possible to use acrylic plastic, metal or plastic
sheeting. In contrast, the electrical connection of thin-film cells is an integral part of the
cell fabrication and is achieved by cutting grooves in the individual layers. Finally, the
standard modules have aluminium frame although it is possible to acquire frameless
modules.
Solar cells included in PV modules convert directly the solar radiation into electrical
energy. In the conversion process, the incident energy of the light creates mobile
charged particles in some materials, known like semiconductors, which are separated by
the device structure and produce electrical current. This current can be used to power an
electric circuit.
The most commonly used photovoltaic cell material is silicon (Si), one of the most
abundant elements on earth. The first commercially available cells were
8
monocrystalline silicon in which all the silicon atoms are perfectly aligned building an
organised crystal.In order to reduce costs, new manufacturing techniques were
developed which in turn gave birth to the polycrystalline solar cells. This type of
material contains many crystals and the atoms are aligned in diferent directions.
Figure 1.4. Main types of solar cells available in the present market
These techniques permit to manufacture solar cells in an easier, cheaper and faster way
using less pure silicon. In this sense, development of thin film technologies has
permitted further cost reductions by reducing the amount of material needed to make a
solar cell. Some materials other than silicon such as cadmium telluride (CdTe), copper
indium diselenide (CIS), amorphous silicon , etc. are used to manufacture solar cells.
Many diferent solar cells are now available on the market and yet more are under
development.
The types of modules are frequently divided according to the technology of the solar
cells incorporated. In this sense, it is common to find in literature monocrystal Si
modules, policrystal Si modules, amorphous Si modules, CdTe modules, CIS modules,
etc. Following this way, a more in-depth explanation of the most important solar cells
technologies existing nowadays is given below.
Crystalline silicon technologies.
9
The most important material for crystalline solar cells is silicon. This is the second most
abundant element on earth though it is never found as a pure chemical element. It is
bounded to oxygen in the form of silicon dioxide. So it is necessary to separate both
elements by means of a chemical process to get metallurgical silicon with a purity of
98%. This type of silicon cannot be used to produce solar cells due to its low purity. So,
it is necessary to apply another purification process which permits to obtain high-grade
silicon (at least 99:9999999% of purity). This high-grade silicon can now be processed
in diferent ways to produce monocrystalline or polycrystalline cells. It is not poisonous,
and it is environment friendly, since its waste does not represent any problem.
Among all kinds of solar cells the silicon solar cells are the most widely used. Their
efficiency is limited due to several factors. The energy of photons decreases at higher
wavelengths. The highest wavelength at which the photon energy is still large enough to
produce free electrons is 1.15m (valid for silicon only). Radiation with higher
wavelength causes only heating up of solar cell and does not produce any electrical
current. Each photon can cause only production of one electron-hole pair. Even at lower
wavelengths many photonsdo not produce any electron-hole pairs, yet they increase
solar cell temperature. The highest achieved efficiency of a silicon solar cell in a
Research Lab lies around 23%, while for other semi-conductor materials this figure
rises up to 30%. In fact, eficiency is dependent on the semiconductor material. The
losses are caused by metal contacts on the upper side of a solar cell, in addition a part of
the solar radiation is reected on the upper side (glass) of solar cell. Crystalline solar cells
are usually wafers, about 0.3 mm thick, sawn from a Si ingot with a diameter of 10 to
15 cm. They generate approximately 35 mA of current per cm2 area (together up to 2
A/cell) at voltage of 550mV at full illumination. The effciency in Lab of the solar cells
exceeds 20%, while classically produced solar cells by commercial brands is usually
above 15%. Actually, there are potential types of silicon solar cells: monocrystalline
(single-crystalline), polycrystalline (both first types commented before) and amorphous.
Nevertheless to create the amorphous silicon cells it is necessary a special technique of
manufacturing, for this reason it is not usually catalog this cells together
monocrystalline or polycrystalline otherwise besides thin film.
Thin film cells
10
During the last years, the development of thin-film processes for manufacturing solar
cells has become more and more important. The process consists of applying a thin
layer of photoactive semiconductors on a substrate (usually glass). The most common
materials are: amorphous silicon (a-Si), thin multicrystalline silicon films on a low-cost
substract, copper indium diselenide (CIS) and cadmium telluride (CdTe).The reduced
material, the energy consumption and the automated production provides this
technology with a very high potential for reducing costs when compared with
crystalline silicon technology.
The amorphous silicon differs from crystalline silicon because silicon atoms are not
located at very precise distances from each other and this randomness in the atomic
structure has a powerful impact on the electronic properties of the material. The
manufacturing process consists in the deposition on a low-cost glass of diferent layers
of oxide, a-Si and a metallic contact. The efficiency of amorphous solar cells lies
typically between 6 and 8%. The lifetime of amorphous cells is shorter than the lifetime
of crystalline cells. Amorphous cells have current density of up to 15mA/cm2, and the
voltage of the cell without connected load of 0.8 V, a larger figure than that of
crystalline cells for this parameter. Their spectral response peaks at the wavelength
range of blue light: therefore, the ideal light source for amorphous solar cells is a
fluorescent lamp. The main disadvantage of the amorphous silicon is its low effciency
(6-8%) which even diminishes during the first 6-12 months of operation. After this
period of time, the efficiency gets a stable value. Related to the thin multicrystalline
silicon films, a conductive ceramic substrate containing silicon is covered with a thin
layer of polycrystalline silicon. The manufacturing process requires lower temperatures
so it is possible to obtain high quality semiconductors which have very high potential to
reduce costs.
Cadmium telluride (CdTe) is a thin-film material produced by deposition or by

sputtering is a promising low cost foundation for photovoltaic applications in the future.
The procedure disadvantage is that a poisonous material (cadmium) is used in its
manufacturing, although some manufacturers support an insurance policy approach to
funding the estimate futurecosts of reclaiming and recycling their modules at the end of
their use. Labsolar cells efficiency is up to 16%, whilst the commercial types efficiency
is up to 8%.
11
Copper-indium-diselenide (CuInSe2, or CIS) is a thin-film material with efficiencies
ranging from some 13% in marketed modules to some 17% achieved at Research Labs.
This is a is promising material, yet not widely used due to production specific
procedures and to the scarcity of indium. Table 1.1 summarises the main characteristics
of commercial solar cells.
Table 1.1. Main characteristics of commercial solar cells

Material Efficiency Nominal power degradation after Colour
a
22-year outdoor exposure
Monocrystal 15-22% 14,8% (TedlarTM and EVA Dark blue
Si encapsulant)
Multicrystal 13-15% 6,4% (Transparent silicon Blue
Si encapsulant)
Amorphous Si 8-15% N/A Red-blue, black
CdTe 6-9% N/A Dark green, black
CIS 7.5-9.5 N/A Black
a
Source: Ewan D. Dunlop and David Halton, The Performance of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Solar
Modules after 22 Years of Continuous Outdoor Exposure, Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl., DOI:
10.1002/pip.627
Nowadays, the PV market offers a huge range of the power output of the PV modules. It
is possible to acquire PV modules from a few watts to several hundred of watts and the
number of the companies which offer PV modules in the world is very high. A typical
standard module consists of 36-72 cells and the power ranges from 75-270 Wp, in the
case of crystalline cells. Sometimes, in some operation conditions solar cells in a PV
module can be shaded and their temperature may increase until it causes damage in the
material. This situation is known like hot spots and when it appears the nominal power
delivered by module is reduced dramatically. In order to avoid and prevent hot spots,
the PV modules must incorporate bypass diodes. Usually, a bypass diode is connected
to protect 18-20 solar cells.
1.2.1.2. Cabling
The cabling of a PV installation is addressed to carry the electricity from the PV
generator to the inverter and from the inverter to grid electricity company. It means that
12
the cabling is required in both DC and AC parts. Special attention must be paid in DC
cabling because the features of DC current make this part more dangerous than AC if a
shortcircuit takes place. For this reason it is advisable to use a isolation level category II
in all wires used, so these types of cables have a double coating to make the cabling
more resistant to weather conditions. In addition, the current that flows in the DC part
(in most cases higher than that which ows in the AC part) makes advisable to use a
suitable cable section to avoid losses in electrical production. In this sense, it has to be
followed the advise which claims that the voltage drop in the cabling must not exceed
1.5%. Section 3 will resume this issue in order to size the suitable cross-section of the
cabling in a PV installation.
Last, in order to make a correct layout of the cabling, it is advisable that the positive
pole and negative pole are separated and clearly differentiated. In this sense the colour
of the positive cable pole must be different than that of the negative, using in the most
of the cases warm colours for the positive (i.e. red) pole and cold colours for negative
pole (i.e. black). In the AC part it is advisable to use differentiated colours between
phases and neutral-ground too.
1.2.1.3. Connection boxes

Connection boxes are the elements where the strings of the PV generator are connected.
The connection boxes role is two-fold: first, it ensures a weatherproof connection
between strings and second, it includes several safety devices very advisable to protect
the installation against electrical failures and weather problems like short circuits by
humidity or degradation by prolonged exposure to solar UV radiation. Figure 1.6 will be
used to illustrate and explain the elements included in DC connection boxes.
1. Each string from the PV generator must be guided to the connection box
separately, positives lines bundled on one side and negatives ones bundled to
another. This measure ensures a safety physical distance between positive and
negative poles avoiding short circuits and enabling easy maintenance works.
2. Each string has a fuse to protect the line against reverse currents. The reverse
currents may appear when one of the strings has a failure and the current of
another strings flow through this faulty string.
13
3. Voltage surge arrestors (varistors) arrest possible overvoltages (e.g.: induced
voltages in cable loops owing to lightning strikes near the installation) that may
appear in the PV generator.
4. The DC switch is a very advisable element in order to break the flow of the DC
current from generator to inverter.
Figure 1.6. State-of-the-art DC connection box. All its elements have a good placement and are accessible
(Courtesy of Suntechnics)
5. All metal works and outputs from varistors must be connected to earth electrode.
6. The output cabling must be guided to the inverter or to another connection box.
Obviously, the cross-section of these output wires must be higher that string
cables.
14
1.2.2 AC Part
The inverter(s), AC cabling, the DC main switch (and both the magnetothermic switch
and the residential current circuit breaker) together with the energy meters are the main
elements that are to be found in the AC part. The inverter is the paramount element in
this part as the energy meter is a device chosen and installed by the electricity company
in most of the cases. In fact, the inverter converts DC current into AC current of the
same characteristics as those of the grid. This is way the inverter(s) are crucial elements
in PV plants.
1.2.2.1. Inverter
Grid-connected inverters are also known as grid-tied inverters. This device (figures 1.2
and 1.3) connects the PV array to the grid, or to both the grid and the AC loads of a
building. It is mainly devoted to convert the solar DC electricity into AC electricity of
the same characteristics as those of the grid, as commented above. The performance of
these devices has significantly improved during the recent past and only small losses
take place in this conversion. In PVPPs, as a particular case of PVGCS, the inverter is
connected directly to the grid following the scheme depicted in figure 1.3, so all the
generated electricity is fed into the grid.
15
Figure 1.7. Image of a 100-kW power rated inverter
during the realization of a quality check.
PVGCS using inverters up to a power of 5 kW usually are usually single-phase systems.

When this figure is exceeded, three-phase inverters are used (Figure 1.7). Making the
most of the voltage-current curve of the PV generator requires the inverter to operate in
the maximum power point (MPP) of this curve. This point ceaselessly changes
according to environmental conditions, so suitable electronic devices must be available
inside the inverter to track this MPP and maximize the DC power input.
Inverters often incorporate built-in trans-formers to electrically isolate the PVGCS from
the grid. Transformerless inverters are smaller and lighter but not all national electrical
regulation codes addressed to grid connected PV allow the use of such devices (i.e: the
Spanish regulations do not allow to use transformerless inverters, while German
regulations do).
16
The conversion efficiency () is the parameter is the ratio between the output AC power
and the input DC power. This parameter takes into account losses caused by the
transformer if this device is built into the inverter- ohmic elements, switching devices,
etc. It is worth noting that conversion efficiency depends on the input DC power: this is
especially noticeable at low levels of irradiance impinging on the PV generator, which
causes a lower load to be connected to the inverter. Manufacturers usually provide a
curve depicting conversion efficiency versus output AC power: state-of-the-art inverters
may achieve a peak in this curve of some 95%. In order to make sound efficiency-based
comparisons of inverters, a reasonable way of measuring efficiency taking into account
different climate conditions (Euro efficiency, or Euro) was introduced by defining the
Euro efficiency ( Euro).
The Euro efficiency is a parameter weighted for the European climate, taking into
account different load conditions due to climate. Parameter Euro is stated as:
Euro
E 0.03
0 5% 0.06
0 10%
10 0.13
0 20%
20 0.1
0 30%
30 0.48
0 50%
50 0.2
0 100%
10 (1.1)
Where the subscript of parameter refers to the efficiency of the inverter at a load
expressed as a percentage of the nominal AC load (100%) which corresponds to 100% .
It must be pointed out that the different weights assigned to each figure of at different
loads was carried out bearing in mind the Central European climate. State-of-the-art
inverters may achieve a Euro ranging from 92 to 96 per cent.
1.2.2.2. Energy meters

The energy meter (figure 1.8) is the element aimed at measuring the AC electricity
produced by the PV installation. This device is placed just before the connection point
of the grid, after the inverter. Obviously, the energy meter is a device installed and
checked by the grid electricity company so that neither the installer or the owner of the
PV system may manipulate it, for obvious reasons.
17
Figure 1.8. Three-phase energy meter with a monitoring and communication system.
Almost all the energy meters installed nowadays have a monitoring system to store the
readings. Then, the readings are accessible for both the installation owner and the
electricity company.
1.2.3 Metal works and earth electrode

Both AC and AC parts have conductive metal works which may be accessible to people.
The earth electrode is a protective element meant to prevent these metal works from
rendering electrical shocks to persons. In fact, a dangerous situation may take place if a
DC or AC wire experiences an isolation fault and it gets in touch with a metal part of
the installation. In this sense and to prevent risky situations like this one, all the metal
works of the PV installation such as the inverter chassis, module frames, DC connection
boxes must be connected with the earth electrode. In this case, if an isolation fault
appears, the earth electrode would play the role of a drain that avoids the risk of an
electrical shock. In addition, one of the terminals of the surge arresters is connected to
18
the earth electrode: this element provides the way to drain the overcurrent that is carried
through these surge arresters.
In spite of being not an active part of the PVGCS, the earth electrode connected to the
metal works are the key to solve safety problems related to isolation failures,
overcurrents and overvoltages. Since the PV plants are usually ungrounded for the sake
of safety and many national electrical regulation codes enforce this electrical scheme-
none of its poles (positive o negative) are connected to the earth electrode, the correct
design of this element is an issue to be attended carefully. Thus, it is highly advisable
that the resistance of earth electrode do not be over to 37 ohms. In addition, the
connection between all the metal works and the earth electrode must be easily visible
and accessible in order to check the system safety (figure 1.8).
Figure 1.8. Connection point between the earth electrode and various metal works in a PV installation.
19
1.5. Some electrical characteristics of a typical 1-MWp PVPP
Given the wide variety of existing marketed devices used to build PVPPs within the
power range that the PVs in Bloom project is focused on (50 kWp - 2 MWp) and the
different technical solutions that may be adopted to install a PVPP of a given peak
power, it is difficult to furnish the reader with some typical electrical characteristics of
such systems. However, an example of a typical PVPP of some 1-MWp implementation
may help get an idea of the range of voltage, current and power these systems deal with.
A widespread technical solution aimed at deploying large-scale PVPPs (with rated

power equal or greater than 1-MWp) may consist of dividing it into smaller PV
subsystems. A state-of-the-art feasible solution may comprise ten 120-MWp
subsystems. Each subsystem PV generator is connected to a 3-phase 100-kW inverter
whilst each couple of inverters are fed to a 400-kVA 380V / 20 kV1 transformer (five of
such transformers are required in total). Figure 1.9 depicts the electric scheme for such a
1.2-MWp PVPP. In this figures, the ten energy meters (one for each inverter) may also
be replaced for just only one placed at the high voltage output of the transformer. In
fact, placing the energy meter at either the low voltage input or the high voltage output
of the latter device usually has to do more with legal matters than with technical
constraints
1
The figure for the high voltage side of the transformer may vary depending on the country electrical
distribution system. The nominal power of the transformer is deliberately oversized up to twice the
inverter connected power.
20
= 245,7
~ kWh
GRID
= 345,2
5 X ~ kWh
400-kVA 380 / 20 kV
transformer
Two 120-kWp Two 100-kW

PV 3-phase
generators inverters
Figure 1.9. Electric scheme of a possible technical solution for a 1.2-MWp PVPP.
The main electrical characteristics in STC of the PV generator of each one of these
possible ten subsystems are gathered in Table 1.2.
Table 1.2. Main electrical characteristics in STC of the PV generator of a subsystem of the typical PVPP
of some 1 MWp described in this section. The figures for these electric characteristics have been chosen
taking into account state-of the art crystalline silicon modules and inverters which drive the selection of
series-connected and parallel-connected modules- marketed at the date of writing this document
Nominal power Open-circuit Short-circuit Voltage at Current at
(Wp) voltage (V) current (A) maximum power maximum power
point (V) point (A)
120 000 790 205 631 190
Throughout section 1 the main features of a photovoltaic grid connected system

have been detailed. In order to describe these systems, a suitable division has
been done. In this sense, any of these systems is roughly compounded of three
21
different parts. So, each part is commented and its constitutive elements have
been approached
DC part: it stretches from the PV generator to the inverter input; the main
characteristic in this part is that the electricity is delivered as DC current. PV
modules, supporting structures, protective elements, wires and DC connection
boxes are included in the DC part. The characteristics (efficiency, encapsulation,
degradation, etc.) and types (monocrystal, policrystal or thin film) of PV cells
and PV modules have been emphasized in this section.
AC part: it stretches from the inverter to public electricity grid; in this part the
electricity is delivered as AC current. Inverter, wires, protective elements and a
metering device intended to measure the electricity sold to the grid. The inverter
efficiency has been emphasized in this section, including equations to calculate
this parameter.
Metal works and earth electrode: this part is aimed to avoiding electrical shocks
to people. Concepts like overcurrents and overvoltages in PV plants together
with the elements addressed to prevent these failures have been presented
Some electrical characteristics of a typical 1-MWp PVPP are provided to help

the reader to achieve a better understanding of this PV concept
22
2. Estimating the annual energy produced by a PV grid-connected
system
Although the cost of a typical on-ground PV installation ranging from 50 kWp to 2

MWp (the size range of the PVPPs that the project PVs in Bloom deals with) has
dramatically been reduced by some 35% during the years 2007-2009, the initial
investment the installation requires forces the prospective owner in many cases to take
money on loan from a bank. The future energy production of the plant is the best
warranty for the owner and for the bank, of course- in order to acomplish the payment
of the loan. This fact may help to get an idea of the importance of making a good
estimate of the annual energy produced by a PV grid-connected system. This section
aims at explaining how to calculate the annual electricity yield of a PV grid-connected
system. In addition, the online existing tools to evaluate the solar resource (the main
uncertainty source) are going to be detailed hereafter as well.
2.1 Assessment on the solar resource of the site

Knowing the solar resource is the first step to evaluate the annual production of a PV
plant. This means that it is necessary to know the annual incident irradiation on the PV
generator. In addition, both the module slope (, or tilt angle, which lies between 0 and
90) and orientation (, or azimuth, East = -90, South = 0, West = 90) have to be
taken into account in this issue because the irradiation received over one year by a
surface with an arbitrary tilt angle and azimuth may largely differ from the irradiation
collected by a horizontal surface (the most common available irradiation data in solar
databases). There are some methods to determine the former parameter from the latter,
but they lie out of the scope of this work. Anyway, it is useful to know that an Equator-
facing PV generator it implies South-facing ( = 0) and North-facing ( = 180) for
North and South hemispheres, respectively- with a tilt angle slightly lower than the
local latitude (opt) maximizes the collected annual global irradiation and consequently
maximizes the electricity generation. Figure 2.1 illustrates the features related to the tilt
angle and the azimuth .
23
Figure 2.1.: Slope and orientation of a PV generator (source: IDAE, 2002. Instalaciones de Energa Solar
Fotovoltaica. Pliego de Condiciones Tcnicas de Instalaciones Conectadas a Red. IDAE, Madrid, p.53)
Before starting to introduce how to evaluate the solar resource, it is interesting to

explain what the irradiation is and what the differences between irradiation (H) and
irradiance (G) are. In order to see the difference between these two terms, Figure 2.2
may be useful for this purpose. Figure 2.2-A depicts a graph of measured irradiance vs.
time during a sunny day. As it is shown, the irradiance has units of watts per square
meter (W/m2) so the irradiance is the incident sunlight power density. Since the
irradiance is nothing but sunlight power per square meter, the instantaneous character of
the irradiance has to be emphasized. In Figure 2.2-B, the area under the latter irradiance
curve and x-axis has been coloured in red: this area is the irradiation collected over this
day. Thus, the irradiation has units of Ws/ m2 or kWh/m2: this means energy collected
per square meter during a specific time interval. If the considered time interval is a day
or a year, the terms daily irradiation or annual irradiation may be used.
Figure 2.2. Graph A depicts the measured irradiance during a sunny day whilst the red area of graph B
equals the collected irradiation during this sunny day
24
Given the statistical nature of the irradiation profile of a site, annual or monthly average
values for the daily irradiation (Hda(0) and Hma(0), respectively) are commonly used
when designing PV systems. As commented earlier, these average values are available
only for horizontal surfaces in most solar databases. However, for installations located
in European sunny climates and with an optimun tilt angle, equation 2.1 is a rule-of-
thumb that broadly relates the annual average horizontal irradiation -H(0)- and the
annual average irradiation collected on a equator-facing, opt tilted surface -H(0,opt):
2 1
H ( 0, op
opt )[ kWhm year ] 1.15 H ( 0 )[ kWhm 2 year 1 ] (2.1)
This obviously means that:
2 1
H da ( 0, op
opt )[ kWhm day ]365 1.15 H da ( 0 )[ kWhm 2 day 1 ]365 (2.2)
This is:
2 1
H da ( 0, op
opt )[ kWhm day ] 1.15 H da ( 0 )[ kWhm 2 day 1 ] (2.3)
If irradiation collected on surfaces with an arbitrarily azimuth angle and tilt angle is
to be estimated -H(,)- some graphs proposed in literature may be of great help. Thus,
figure 2.3 is intended to derive the latter value from H(0) and it can be applied to similar
range of latitudes to those of Spain (i.e.: Southern European countries). An example is
provided to achieve a better understanding of its use.
25
Figure 2.3. Percentage ratio between the average annual daily radiation on an arbitrarily oriented surface
and the maximum value of this parameter in Madrid ( = 0 and =35 )
(source: IDAE, 2002. Instalaciones de Energa Solar Fotovoltaica. Pliego de Condiciones Tcnicas de
Instalaciones Conectadas IDAE, Madrid, p.55)
The concentric circumferences represent the tilt angle while the radii indicate the
orientation (azimuth angle) of the surface in figure 2.3. For example, let us assume that
the location is Jan, Spain (37N latitude, 3W longitude) where Hda(0) = 4.9 kWhm-
2
day-1. Hda(0) is located in the centre of the circle (blue dot). It stems from the colour
code of the figure that Hda(0) =0.85Hda(0,35). Consequently, Hda(0,35)=Hda(0) /
0.85= 5.8 kWhm-2 day-1 (black dot). Let us now assume a surface with = -30 y =
60 (red dot). According to the colour code of the figure, Hda(-
30,60)=0.85Hda(0,35)= 4.93 kWhm-2 day-1. The white central area suggests that
collected irradiation show relative little sensitivity to small deviations from the optimal
orientation and tilt angle.
There are some other graphs in literature intended for the same purpose as that
described above. For instance, figure 2.4 provides the average annual irradiation
(kWhm-2year-1) in Berlin according to the azimuth and tilt angle of the considered
26
surface. The relative shape of the contour lines not the specific values of the average
annual irradiation- may apply to Central European climates
Figure2.4. Average annual irradiation (kWhm-2year-1) in Berlin depending on the azimuth and tilt angle
(Source: DGS and Ecofys, 2005. Planning and Installing Photovoltaic Systems. A guide for installers,
architects and engineers, James & James, London, p. 13)
Two-axis tracking in Southern Europe may achieve irradiation gains up to some 40% when
compared to static surfaces optimally oriented and tilted (0,opt). This gain lowers down to some
30% in Central Europe, due to its cloudier climate. Single-axis tracking in Southern Europe may
achieve irradiation gains up to some 25-33% -depending on the tracking method- when
compared to static systems to static surfaces optimally oriented and tilted (0,opt). This gain
lowers down to some 20% in Central Europe, owing to the same fact as that mentioned earlier.
Apart from the above graphical methods, there are some convenient software tools
addressed to evaluate the irradiation on an arbitrarily inclined and oriented surface for a
specific site (determined by its latitude and longitude). Most of this software tools work
with a data base obtained through two ways: data collected by ground-based
measurements and/or satellite-derived data. These software applications usually have a
software engine which is able to evaluate the irradiation through complex interpolation
methods taking into account the data from several meteorological stations and/or
satellite observations around the placement of the PV plant.
In this sense, programs like Meteonorm, Sundy and Shell Solar Path make possible and
easy to evaluate the annual irradiation of a given site. There are some free online
software tools to estimate the irradiation too. In this way, for Europe and Africa
locations, the EC-funded PVGIS project (http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvgis/) gives support
27
through a excelent web aplication shown in figure 2.5. The application options -which
has been designed for PV projects- makes it possible to include a lot of technical
characteristics of the PV installation even if the installation uses tracking techniques.
Figure2.5. Web application to estimate the irradiation included in PVGIS web site (source:
http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvgis/apps3/pvest.php#).
Last, the NASA website (http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/sse/) provides online Irradiation

data but in this case the values are available for any place around the world.
2.2. Estimating the annual electricity yield of a PV grid-connected system
A system is said to be 1-kWp rated if its PV generator produces 1 kW under Standard

Test Conditions (STC). These conditions consist of a global irradiance of 1000 Wm-2
with a spectral distribution conforming to the AM 1.5G spectrum and a PV module cell
temperature of 25C. Despite this apparently complex definition, PV system rating
using kWp (or its multiples) is convenient, since it enables a straightforward estimation
of the annual energy yield of a PVGCS (EPV) by means of the following equation:
E PV [ kWh yearr 1 ] H ( , ))[ kWhm 2 yearr 1 ] P* [ kWp ] PR (2.4)
28
Where P* = PV generator power in STC and PR = performance ratio
The performance ratio is related to the efficiency of the system together with many
other losses that inevitably take place operation temperature losses, power
conditioning and wiring losses, etc- and influence electricity generation in PV systems.
PR values for well designed PVGCS may be assumed ranging from 0.70 to 0.80. These
figures are in good agreement with many available performance data.
An example may help to achieve a better understanding of eqn. (2.4). Let us assume a 1-
MWp PVGCS located on a site where the average annual irradiation on the PV
generator equals 1900 kWhm-2year-1. If a figure of 0.7 is assumed for the performance
ratio of the system, then:
E PV (kWhyear 1 ) 1900
1 kWhm 2 year 1 1000 kWp0.7 1330000
1 kWhyear 1
A commonly used parameter to assess the amount of solar electricity produced by a

PVGCS is the final yield (Yf, in kWhkWp-1year-1). Figure 2.6 depicts some minimum
and maximum values for this parameter in some countries. Also, Table 2.1 gathers some
typical values for this parameter calculated in some specific sites located in each project
partner country.
29
Figure 2.6. Minimum and maximum annual PV electricity yields in different countries produced by a 1-
kWp system (kWh year-1) with optimally inclined PV modules and performance ratio equal to 0.75.
(Sources: European Commission Joint Research Centre,
http://re.jrc.cec.eu.int/pvgis/apps/pvest.php?lang=en&map=Europe; and National Renewable Energy
Laboratory, http://www.nrel.gov/rredc/pvwatts/).
Table 2.1 Typical values for this parameter calculated in some specific sites located in each project
partner country. N.B.: PVGIS software has been used. Equator-facing and optimally tilted static
structures together with a performance ratio that equals 0.8 have been assumed
Place Latitude, longitude Optimal tilt angle () Yf, (kWhkWp-1year-1)

Representative places from Italy
Padova (Italy) 45.410N, 11.877E 34 1144
Belluno (Italy) 46.140N, 12.218E 36 1096
Berchidda (Italy) 40.785N, 9.166E 34 1456
Lugo di Vicenza (Italy) 45.746N, 11.530E 35 1112
Mores (Italy) 41.474N, 1.564E 34 1376
Sassari (Italy) 40.727N, 8.56E 34 1456
Siliqua (Italy) 39.301N, 8.81E 34 1472
Representative places from Greece
Afetes (Greece) 39.283N, 23.18E 30 1328
Aiginio (Greece) 40.511N, 22.54E 31 1280
Lefkonas (Greece) 41.099N, 23.50E 31 1224
Milies (Greece) 39.328N, 23.15E 30 1352
Sourpi (Greece) 39.103N, 22.90E 29
1304
30
Representative places from Poland
Adamow (Poland) 50.595N, 23.15E 35

936
Gmina Wisznice (Poland) 51.789N, 23.21E 36
944
Urzad Miasta Lublin 51.248N, 22.57E 36
(Poland) 936
Representative places from Austria
Burgau (Austria) 48.432N, 10.41E 36

1000
Frstenfeld (Austria) 47.095N, 15.98E 35
1064
Representative places from Slovakia
Drahovce 48.518N, 17.80E 35

1040
Bacuch 48.859N, 19,81E 38
1024
Representative places from Spain
Valencia 39.470N, -0.377E 35

1400
Jan 37.766N, -3.790E 33
1544
Alcaudete 37.591, -4.087E 33
1560
Hornos 38.217N, -2.720E 32
1520
Explaining how to calculate the solar irradiaton collected on a surface with a

given orientation () and tilt angle (), paves the way to calculate the energy
produced by a PV plant.
Some graphical methods have been provided to estimate the solar irradiaton
collected on an arbitrarily oriented and tilted surface. (H( ,)). Some software
tools addressed to the same purpose have been introduced
An equation that combines accuracy and simplicity aimed at calculating the
annual energy production of the installation has been presented:
E PV [ kWh yearr 1 ] H ( , ))[ kWhm 2 yearr 1 ] P* [ kWp ] PR
Where P* = PV generator power in STC and PR = performance ratio (0.7-0.8)
31
3. Sizing PV grid-connected systems
This section deals with the basic concepts aimed at sizing a PV grid-connected system
deployed on a degraded area (a PVPP). Accomplishing an in-depth explanation of how
to design a PVPP by means of a rigorous and universal approach, covering each
configuration, would encompass nearly every possible case. On the other hand, this
would require much more effort and would reduce the understandability of the text.
Consequently, the concepts presented hereafter have been simplified to some extent and
only sizing flat-plate module PVGCS with central inverter is studied.
3.1. Choosing the PV module
The used PV modules highly determine the sizing of the remaining PVGCS elements. A
rough estimate of 10 m2 of required area per installed kWp is useful as a first approach.
Taking into account the present state of the art, more accurate estimations are gathered in
table 3.1, depending on the solar cell technology. Mono and polycrystalline silicon solar
cells still hold the lions share of the PV market, but new promising technologies like that
based on CdTe are increasing their presence in it.
1 kWp 10 m2 of required surface (crystalline silicon) if the PV modules are deployed in

the same plane as the surface roof or terrain- on which they are supported
It is worth noting that the above considerations are true if the PV modules are deployed in
the same plane as the surface roof or terrain- on which they are supported. This is not the
case in most PVPPs. In PVPPs, making an estimate of the required area for the system
may turn into a complex problem which involves local latitude, terrain slope, module tilt
angle, etc. However, for the sake of simplicity, the following statements will be assumed:
horizontal terrain surface, tilt angle slightly lower than the latitude, and no self shadowing
between PV module arrays. Taking into account the present state of the art as above, table
3.2 shows the required terrain surface to install a 1-kWp PVGCS, depending on the solar
cell technology.
Table 3.1. Required surface for a 1-kWp PVGCS if PV modules are deployed in the same plane as the
surface roof or terrain- on which they are supported (Source: DGS y Ecofys, 2008. Planning and Installing
32
Photovoltaic Systems. A guide for installers, architects and engineers. Second Edition. James & James,
London, p. 151)
Technology Surface (m2)
Monocrystalline silicon 7-9
Polycrystalline silicon 8-11
Copper Indium Diselenide (CIS) 11-13
Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) 14-18
Amorphous silicon 16-20
1 kWp 20 m2 of required surface (crystalline silicon) if the PV modules are deployed

on an horizontal terrain surface, tilt angle slightly lower than the latitude and with no self-
shadowing between PV module arrays
Tabla 3.2 Required surface for 1-kWp if the PV modules are deployed on an horizontal terrain surface, tilt
angle slightly lower than the latitude and with no self-shadowing between PV module arrays. Note: the
figures gathered here are somewhat overestimated. More accurate calculations for each specific latitude may
lead to smaller values of the required surface
Monocrystalline silicon 20
Polycrystalline silicon 27
Copper Indium Diselenide (CIS) 32
Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) 40
Both inverter and PV modules manufacturers supply the most characteristic electrical
parameters of their products. The most relevant ones are shown in Tables 3.3 and 3.4. As it
will be shown hereafter, these parameters are paramount for the system design. Some other
features such as weight, dimensions, etc. are also usually enclosed in the manufacturer data
sheets
33
Table 3.3. Most relevant electrical parameters of a PV module usually supplied by its manufacturer
Parameter Symbol
Short circuit current temperature coefficient (mAC-1) IMOD,SC
Open circuit voltage temperature coefficient (mVC-1) VMOD,OC
Current at the MPP at STC (A) IMOD,M,STC
Short circuit current at STC (A) IMOD,SC,STC
Parallel connected cells Ncp
Series connected cells Ncs
Maximum power at STC (Wp) PMOD,M,STC
Nominal operation cell temperature (C) NOTC
Voltage at the MPP at STC (V) VMOD,M,STC
Open circuit voltage at STC (V) VMOD,OC,STC
Table 3.4. Most relevant electrical parameters of an inverter usually supplied by its manufacturer
Parameter Symbol
Maximum efficiency (adim) INV,M
Power factor (adim) cos

Grid frequency (Hz) f
Maximum input DC current (A) IINV,M,DC
Nominal output AC current (A) IINV,AC
Lowest voltage at which the inverter tracks the MPP (V) VINV,m,MPP
Highest voltage at which the inverter tracks the MPP (V) VINV,M,MPP
Nominal input power (W) PINV,DC
Nominal output power (W) PINV,AC
Maximum input voltage (V) VINV,M
Nominal output voltage (V) VINV,AC
3.2. Sizing the nominal power of the PV generator

Planning the nominal power of a PV generator (the sum of the maximum power at STC
of the modules used) may depend on two criteria. It is up to the owner to select the most
restrictive one:
- Available area: this is especially crucial, and table 3.2 must be kept in mind
34
- Cost of the installed PVGCS. Nowadays, a rough estimate of the initial
investment on the system may range from some 3,000 to 6,000 Euro. Anyway,
the cost of crystalline silicon modules has experienced a sharp decline during the
years 2007-09 and it seems this downward trend will continue in the short-term.
The PV generator is composed by arranging parallel connections between series-

connected modules (strings). Consequently, the voltage of the PV generator equals the
voltage of one string, whilst its current equals the sum of the current of all parallel
connected strings.
3.3. Sizing the nominal power of the inverter
Prior to provide some guidance aimed at sizing the nominal power of the inverter, some
advice must be provided regarding its location. In general, the inverter must be close to
the AC protective devices (surge arresters, residual current circuit breaker, etc.) and the
energy meter. It is also advised to place the DC connection box where the strings are
parallel connected-as near as possible to the inverter, so that voltage drops through
cables are minimized. Despite many inverters comply with IP-code 65, a weatherproof
hut is advisable to preserve these devices from the environment. Obviously, all the
manufacturer recommendations concerning temperature and humidity must be strictly
followed. As commented in a previous section, in general, only three-phase inverters are
available over 5 kW.
A useful parameter addressed to size the nominal input power (PINV,DC) of the inverter is
the sizing factor FS = PINV,DC / PGFV,M,STC , where PGFV,M,STC is the maximum power of
the PV generator at STC. A widespread recommendation of FS according to the latitude
is shown in Table 3.5. These figures are suggested provided that an equator-facing PV
generator with a tilt angle close to the latitude is planned.
35
Table 3.5. Recommended values for Fs in Europe as a function of the latitude (Source: Jantsch M.,
Schmidt H., Schmid, J., 1992. Results on the concerted action on power conditioning and control.
Proceedings of the XI European PV Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Montreux, Switzerland, pp.
1589-1592)
Zone Fs
Northern Europe (lat. 55 - 70) 0,65 0,8
Central Europe (lat. 45 - 55) 0,75 0,9
Southern Europe (lat. 35 - 45) 0,85 1,0
Fs must be lowered down as latitude increases. This is due to the fact that STC rarely
occur outdoors and the PV generator power output hardly exceeds PGFV,M,STC in Europe
as a whole. However, the sunny climate of Southern Europe cause the electricity generated
by a PVGCS to be generated at high levels of irradiance. These high levels of irradiance
imply PV generator power output is close to PGFV,M,STC and sometimes exceeds it. Then, it
is advised that 0,8PGFV,M,STC PINV,DC PGFV,M,STC (0,8 Fs 1) so that the inverter is
not overloaded for a long time. Obviously, lower values of Fs for Northernmost latitudes
increases the energy performance and leads to select inverters with a smaller power for the
same nominal power of the PV generator.
Apart from the above considerations, there is a considerable degree of freedom when
choosing Fs. In practical terms, and provided that Fs is not too low, the influence of Fs in
the performance of the PVGCS is scarcely relevant. In this sense, it has been identified a
trend in designers of PVGCS in sunny climates, who often choose Fs = 1.
3.4. Sizing the number of PV modules
In principle, if a nominal power of the PV generator given by PGFV,M,STC is to be

achieved using modules with a nominal power of PMOD,M,STC, the number of these
modules to be installed may be written as:
PGFV , M , STC
N Int (3.1)
PMOD , M , STC
36
Eq. (3.1) is a first approach to the number of modules required, as sizing the PV
generator requires to determine the number of series connected modules or strings (Nms)
which are to be parallel connected connected (Nmp). Both figures depend on the specific
PV module and the voltage range where the inverter tracks the MPP. Additionally,
special care must be taken not to exceed the maximum input voltage of the inverter. As
shown hereafter, not always N equals Nmp Nms. More specifically:
a) Nms must be chosen so that the sum of voltages at the MPP of all the modules
in a string lies within the voltage range where the inverter tracks the MPP in
the V-I curve of the PV generator. Nms must be sized so that the voltage at the
inverter input never exceeds the maximum voltage that this device can
withstand (VINV,M)
b) Some strings must be parallel-connected (Nmp) until the nominal power of
the PV generator is approximately achieved. Nmp must be sized so that the
current fed at the inverter input does not exceed its maximum rating
(IINV,M,DC)
3.5. Sizing the number of series-connected modules
Nms must lie within a minimum and maximum limit. The calculation of these limits is
detailed below.
3.5.1. Maximum number of series-connected modules
Low temperatures make the open circuit voltage of the PV generator increase. The most
dangerous situation may take place in a cold winter day when the inverter is
disconnected (owing to a grid failure, for example). A high voltage appears at the
inverter input that could seriously harm the device if this voltage exceeds the maximum
voltage that this device can withstand (VINV,M). Despite being conservative, a
widespread criterion assumes that the cell temperature (Tc ) may drop down to -10C. In
this case, the maximum number of series-connected modules that can be fed to the
inverter is given by:
37
V INV , M
mx ( N ms ) Int (3.2)
V MOD ,OC (Tc 10 C )
The PV module data sheets do not supply its open circuit voltage at Tc = -10C, but
these data sheets usually show the open circuit voltage temperature coefficient VMOD,OC
(usually expressed in mVC-1), so that ( VMOD,OC < 0):
VMOD ,OC (Tc 7

70 C) VMOD ,OC , STC 35 VM
3 MOD ,OC (3.3)
If VMOD,OC is expressed in C-1, eq. (3.3) turns into:
VMOD ,OC (Tc 70

7 C) VMOD ,OC , STC (1 35
3 VM
MOD ,OC ) (3.4)
The following approximation might be used for mono and policrystalline silicon:
VMOD ,OC (Tc 10

1 C) 1,14VMOD ,OC , STC
1, (3.5)
3.5.2. Minimum number of series-connected modules
High temperatures make both the open circuit and the MPP voltage of the PV generator
decrease. If the latter drops below the lowest voltage at which the inverter tracks the
MPP (VINV,m,MPP), this device cannot get the maximum power from the PV generator
and it could even shut off. A widespread criterion assumes that the cell temperature (Tc )
may rise up down to 70C: in this case, a minimum number of series connected
modules must be ensured to avoid the situation described above:
V INV ,m, MPP

mn ( N ms ) Int
In 1 (3.6)
V MOD , M (Tc 70
7 C)
The quotient VINV,m,MPP / VMOD,M(Tc= 70C) must be increased in one unit to ensure in
excess rounding. As commented earlier, the PV module data sheets do not supply its
38
voltage at MPP at Tc = 70C, but it may be calculated as follows (remember that
VMOD,OC < 0):
VMOD , M (Tc 7
70 C) VMOD , M , STC 4 VM
45 MOD ,OC (3.7)
If VMOD,OC is expressed in C-1, eq. (3.7) turns into:
VMOD , M (Tc 7
70 C) VMOD , M , STC (1 4
45 VM
MOD ,OC ) (3.8)
The following approximation might be used for mono and policrystalline silicon:
VMOD , M (Tc 7
70 C) 0,82VMOD , M , STC (3.8)
Figure 3.1 is addressed to clarify the above considerations and calculations. Once the
minimum and maximum number of series connected modules is ascertained, a figure
between them must be selected.
3.6. Sizing the number of parallel connected modules
Once Nms has been determined, the number of parallel connected modules is calculated
as:
N
N mp Int (3.9)
N ms
As commented earlier, usually N Nms Nmp. Further, the inverter input current must
never exceed its maximum rating (IINV,M,DC). Consequently, the following inequation has
to be verified:
Nmp I MOD , SC, STC I INV , M , DC (3.10)
If inequation (3.10) is not true, a higher figure for Nms should be chosen, so that a lower
value for Nmp is obtained by means of eq. (3.9). This new lower value of Nmp must
comply with eq (3.10).
39
Voltage window where the inverter tracks
the PV generator MPP
Tc = -10C
Tc = 25C
I (A)
Tc = 70C
Maximum input voltage

at the inverter input
V (V)
Inverter shut-off voltage Lowest voltage at which the inverter Highest voltage at which the inverter
tracks the MPP tracks the MPP
Fig. 3.1. Voltage-current curves of a PV generator at different cell temperatures (Tc) and
identical irradiance (G) together with characteristic voltages of the inverter. N.B.: the second-order
influence that the cell temperature exerts on the short circuit current has been neglected in the figure
...
DC connection box DC main Magnetothermic Residual current

switch
Metal works (supporting structure)
switch circuit breaker

Inverter
Fuses enclosure
+ DC main
Energy meter

cable L1 130,5
=
...
...
- ~ N kWh

Inverter
Surge Surge Grid

arresters arresters
Surge arresters
PE
...
Earth bar
PV generator
Figure 3.2. Detailed scheme of a PVGCS (it has been assumed a single-phase inverter, although this
scheme also applies basically to a three-phase one)
40
3.7. Sizing the cabling
Figure 3.2 depicts a detailed PVGCS scheme. PV modules are series connected in
strings which are parallel connected in the DC connection box by means of cables
whose length may vary depending on how far module strings are from this box. The DC
main cable connects the DC connection box to a main DC switch located at the inverter
input. The DC main cable cross-section is obviously larger than those of the strings,
since it carries the sum of the currents that are carried by each string cable. A
magnetothermic switch is placed at the inverter output, together with a residual current
circuit breaker. Then, the electricity is fed to the grid through the energy meter device.
Regarding more detailed engineering details, each project partner must ensure that the
PVGCS complies with its national low voltage regulation code by reviewing it.
Sizing the cabling implies taking into account three crucial criteria: a) the withstand
voltage, b) the current carrying capacity and c) limiting the voltage drops through cables
at STC so that losses are minimized. Most marketed cables usually withstand voltages
up to 1000 V, which is a figure that is not exceeded in general by PV systems.
Additionally, many cables are prepared to be laid outdoors, so this does not pose any
problem in PV systems. Consequently, sizing the cables mainly implies taking into
account criteria b) and c) so that the most restrictive of them imposes the cable cross-
section to be selected.
3.7.1. Current carrying capacity
The maximum current that can flow through cables depends mostly on their cross-
section, and also on ambient temperature, their layout, if they are bundled or not, etc.
Values for the maximum currents vs. cross-section can be consulted in standard IEC
60512 part 3, although some countries have their own adapted standards (in Spain, the
standard AENOR EA 0038 applies). Additionally, IEC 60512 prescribes that PV cables
must be earth-fault proof and short-circuit proof.
41
According to IEC 60364-7-712 at its operation temperature- each string cable must be
able to carry 1.25 times the short circuit current at STC of the string (the same current as
that of a single module) provided that fuses are available to avoid reverse currents, as
commented earlier. The same current carrying criterion applies to both the DC main
cable and the AC cable at the inverter output.
3.7.2. Limiting the voltage drops through cables at STC
Each project partner must review their national regulations concerning allowed or
recommended voltage drops at STC through cables (both in the DC and AC parts). In
the case of Spain, it is recommended a 1.5% of the voltage of the PV generator at MPP
at STC for the DC part, while not exceeding this figure for the inverter nominal output
voltage is compulsory in the AC part.
The calculation of the minimal cable cross-section of a string cable (Sm,string, in mm2) in
DC as a function of the voltage drop allowed in a string ( Vstring, as a fraction of the
voltage of the PV generator which equals that of the string- at MPP at STC) is derived
from the following equation, for a string of a simple cable length Lstring (m):
2L I
string MOD, M , STC
S
m, string (3.11)
V N V
string ms MOD, M , STC
-1
Symbol stands for conductivity, which in the case of copper equals 56 m mm-2.
The term NmsVMOD,M,STC is the voltage of the PV generator at MPP at STC.
If the DC main cable has a simple cable length Lmain (m), its minimal cross-section
(Sm,main, in mm2) as a function of the voltage drop allowed in this cable ( Vmain, as a
fraction of the voltage of the PV generator at MPP at STC) is derived from the
following equation, very similar to eq. (3.11):
2Lmain N mp I MOD ,M ,STC

S m,main (3.12)
Vmmain N ms VMOD ,M ,STC
42
Regarding the minimal cross-section of the cable in the AC part (Sm,AC, in mm2) as a
function of the voltage drop allowed in this part ( VAC, as a fraction of the nominal
inverter output voltage), it may be written as:
2L AC I INV , AC cos
S m, AC (isingle - phaseinverter) (3.13)
V AAC VINV , AC
3L AC I INV , AC cos
S m , AC ( three - phaseinverter) (3.14)
V AC
A V INV , AC
Where LAC (m) es la simple AC cable length and IINV,AC (A) is the nominal inverter
output current
3.8. Sizing some protective measures
A comprehensive review of the sizing of all required and advisable protective

measures for PVGCS lies out of the aims and scope of this document. So that it is
strongly suggested that the readers should review the sections of their national low
voltage regulation codes that deal with this important issue. Anyway, a short review of
highly advisable protective measures depicted in figure 3.2 is detailed below:
PV modules are manufactured with built-in bypass diodes to avoid local overheatings
(hot spots) that may seriously harm the module in case of severe shadowing, cracked
cells, faulty V-I module curve, etc.
Despite being widely used in the past, blocking diodes addressed to prevent reverse
currents have been nearly replaced by fuses completely, due to the drawbacks that
posed blocking diodes. In this sense, string cables must be protected against reverse
currents by means of gR fuses (standard IEC 60269) inserted in both poles2. These
reverse currents may take place when a string experiences an isolation fault, for
example, and they could seriously harm the string cables.
The floating configuration is the safest one (both poles isolated from ground).
However all the metal works of the installation must be grounded. More specifically:
2
This protection is highly advised when three or more string are parallel connected
43
module frames, supporting structures, DC connection box, and metal enclosures that
house both the main DC switch and the inverter must be connected to the earth bar.
Large area cable loops appear in PV generators, which in turn may cause voltage
surges when a lightning strike hits close to the PVGCS. Consequently, voltage surge
arresters between both positive and negative poles and earth is an advisable practice.
These devices must be installed in the DC connection box. If the distance between this
box and the inverter exceeds 10 m, they also must be installed in the inverter input,
unless this device has its own protective devices. Voltage surge arresters must be
available at the inverter output.
3.8.1. Sizing fuses
As commented above, gR fuses are housed inside the DC connection box and are series
connected to each module string. Then, string cables are protected by fuses against
reverse currents caused by faulty operation conditions. A common and widespread
criterion to determine the fuse nominal current (Ifuse) is the following one:
I MOD , SC , STC I fuse 2I MOD , SC , STC (3.15)
So that it can be assumed that:

1,5I MOD , SC , STC I fuse (3.16)
The fuse nominal current is standardized in accordance with IEC 60269. Last, fuses
must be suited for DC current and must withstand 1.1. times the open circuit voltage of
the PV generator at STC (NmsVMOD,OC,STC).
3.8.2. DC connection box and sizing the DC main switch
Some weatherproof (IP-54 code) DC connection boxes are marketed at present so that a
limited number of strings can be easily connected in parallel with their corresponding
fuses. Voltage surge arrestors can be connected inside these boxes (see figure 1.6, in
section 1)
44
A DC main switch must be installed between the PV generator and the inverter
according to IEC 60364-7-712. This DC main switch must withstand: a) the open circuit
voltage of the PV generator at a cell temperature of -10C and b) 1.25 times the short
circuit current of the PV generator at STC (1,25NmpIMOD,SC,STC)
3.9 Some characteristic data concerning implemented PVPPs
Two examples of real and successfully implemented PVPPs will be described hereafter
to help get an idea of the range of voltage, current, power, electricity yield, etc. that
some present state-of-the art systems deal with. Some of their features will also be
superficially discussed. Leaving aside the different levels of irradiation that can be
collected throughout Europe, it is worth saying once again that the existing huge variety
of manufactures of PV devices makes it difficult to provide some typical figures for
many of the above parameters.
3.9.1. A 101.2-kWp PVPP in Herreruela de Oropesa (Toledo province, Spain)
This PVPP is located in Herreruela de Oropesa (Toledo province, Spain) on an infertile

plot of land, as depicted in figure 3.3. This site has a latitude 39 53N, longitude 5 14
and height 355 m. The local meteorological conditions of the site are characterised by
an annual average daily horizontal irradiation of 4.6 kWhm-2 together with an annual
average daily temperature of 14C.
The PVPP is deployed by means four ADESTM two-axis trackers -25.3 kWp-rated each-
so that the complete PV field adds up to 101.2 kWp. The latter comprises 440
SuntechTM WXS230S monocrystalline modules 230 Wp-rated each. The DC-AC
conversion is carried out by a XantrexTM GT100E 3-phase 100-kW central inverter.
This PVPP was put into commission in early 2008 and has yielded an average of 2030
kWhkWp-1year-1 since then. Table 3.6 gathers some characteristic electrical parameters
of the system.
45
Table 3.8. Main electrical characteristics at STC of the PV generator of the PVPP located in Herreruela de
Oropesa described in this subsection
Nominal Series- Parallel- Open-circuit Short- Voltage at Current at
power connected connected voltage (V) circuit maximum maximum power
(Wp) modules modules current (A) power point (V) point (A)
101 200 11 40 611 226 475 212
Figure 3.3. PVPP in Herreruela de Oropesa (Toledo province, Spain). The photograph depicts on the left
a two-axis tracker of a neighbouring PVPP
3.9.2. A 9.2-MWp PVPP in Jan (Jan province, Spain)

The 9.2-MWp solar farm Olive tree fields (Olivares) is located in a 16-hectare land
plot in Jan (Jan province, Spain, latitude 38N, longitude 3W, height 520 m). This
land plot presents a nearly shadow-free skyline with negligible elevations over the
horizon. Last, a high-voltage transformer centre (20 kV / 132 kV) neighbours on the
site, so an easy access to grid connection is available.
46
The local meteorological conditions of the site are characterised by an annual average
daily horizontal irradiation of 49 kWhm-2 together with an annual average daily
temperature of 16C.
Nearly half the above area was a garbage dump, while the other half was a low
profitable olive tree plantation, as depicted in figure 3.4. The owner of this area was not
happy either with the degraded condition of part of this area or with the low profitability
achieved by producing olive oil. Consequently, he felt enthusiastic when requested by
the future owners of the PVPP to rent out his land plot to deploy the solar farm. The
olive trees were to be pulled up and then the ground conditioned, together with that of
the neighbouring garbage dump, so as to install the PV plant.
High voltage transformer centre (20 kV / 132 kV)
Former garbage dump Former low-profitable olive tree plantation
Figure 3.4. Aerial view of the land plot prior to the deployment of the solar farm Olive tree fields
Only 220-Wp monocrystalline silicon (m-Si) modules IsofotnTM IS-220 have been
used in the solar farm Olive tree fields. Semi-fixed supporting structures allow
changing the tilt angle ranging from 15 to 35 according to the season of the year. Its
design comprises seventy two subplants rated 1214 kWp each, together with four more
ones, rated 1056 kWp each, adding up to seventy six subplants. The 1214-kWp and
1056-kWp PV fields are connected to the grid by means of IngeConTM Sun 100-kVA
and IngeConTM Sun 90-kVA 3-phase central inverters, respectively. This PVPP was put
47
into commission in August 2008 and has yielded an average slightly over 1600
kWhkWp-1year-1 since then. Figure 3.5. shows a partial view of the solar farm.
Figure 3.5. Partial view of the 9.2-MWp PVPP located in Jan (solar farm Olive tree fields)
Table 3.9 gathers the layout of the PV field according to each type of subplant. Their
electrical characteristics in STC are shown in table 3.10
Table 3.9. Electrical layout of both existing types of subplant PV fields

Subplant 1214-kWp PV field Subplant 1056-kWp PV field
Number of modules connected in parallel 46 40
Number of modules connected in series 12 12
Table 3.10. Electrical characteristics at STC of both existing types of subplant PV fields
Parameter Subplant 121.4-kWp PV field Subplant 105.6-kWp PV field

Open-circuit voltage (V) 691 691
Short-circuit current (A) 234 204
Voltage at maximum power point (V) 553 553
Current at maximum power point (A) 219 191
Nominal power (Wp) 121 400 105 600
48
Required surface for 1-kWp PVPP if the PV modules are deployed on an

horizontal terrain surface, tilt angle slightly lower than the latitude and with no
self-shadowing between PV module arrays. Note: the figures gathered here are
somewhat overestimated. More accurate calculations for each specific latitude may
lead to smaller values of the required surface
Monocrystalline silicon 20
Polycrystalline silicon 27
Copper Indium Diselenide (CIS) 32
Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) 40
Sizing the nominal power of a PV generator mainly depend on two criteria. It is

up to the owner to select the most restrictive one: available area and cost of the
installed PVGCS (if attractive financial incentives are available, a more in-depth
economic analysis must be accomplished)
Sizing the inverter implies selecting a figure for the ratio between the inverter
nominal power and the PV generator nominal power. Some tables are provided for
this parameter according to the local latitude, though there is a considerable degree
of freedom when choosing a figure for it.
A PV generator is compounded of parallel-connected strings of modules. The
number of parallel-connected strings and the number of modules in a string is
driven by the inverter maximum ratings, so as the latter device is not damaged
during the normal operation of the PV generator
Sizing the cabling implies taking into account two crucial criteria: the withstand
voltage and the current carrying capacity. It is highly advised to limit the voltage
drops through cables at STC in the PV generator so that losses are minimized.
The same applies to cable losses in the AC part. Needless to say, both DC and
AC parts must comply with national electrical regulation codes
It is strongly suggested that the readers should review the sections of their
national low voltage regulation codes that deal with protective measures in PV
installations. Some of them are dealt with in this section
Leaving aside the different levels of irradiation that can be collected in each
country, the existing wide variety of manufactures of PV devices makes it
49
difficult to provide some typical figures for electrical characteristics of
PVPPs. Despite this, two exemplary state-of the art PVPPs have been reviewed
APPENDIX OF SECTION 3: TERMINOLOGY
IMOD,SC = Short circuit current temperature coefficient of a PV module (mAC-1)

VMOD,OC = Open circuit voltage temperature coefficient of a PV module (mVC-1)
VAC (adim) = Voltage drop as a fraction of the nominal inverter output voltage
Vstring (adim) = Voltage drop in a string as a fraction of the voltage of the PV generator
at MPP at STC
Vmain(adim) = Voltage drop in the DC main cable as a fraction of the voltage of the PV
generator at MPP at STC
INV,M (adim) = Maximum inverter efficiency
-1
(m mm-2) = Conductivity
cos (adim) = Inverter power factor
f (Hz) = Frequency of the grid
Fs(adim) = Sizing factor
G (Wm-2) = Incident irradiance
GSTC (Wm-2) = Incident irradiance at STC (1000 Wm-2)
Gda (kWhm-2 day-1) =Annual daily average daily irradiation on horizontal surface
Gda( (kWhm-2 da-1) = PV generator on-plane annual daily average irradiation
Ifuse (A) = Nominal fuse current
IINV,AC (A) = Nominal inverter output current
IINV,M,DC (A) = Inverter input maximum DC current

IMOD,M,STC (A) = PV module current at MPP at STC
IMOD,SC,STC (A) = PV module short-circuit current at STC
LAC (m) = AC cable simple length
Lmain (m) = DC main cable simple length
Lstring (m) = String cable simple length
N (adim) = Total number of modules of the PV generator
Ncs (adim) = Series connected cells in a module
Ncp (adim) = Parallel connected cells in a module
50
Nmp (adim) = Parallel connected number of strings
Nms (adim) = Series connected PV modules in a string
NOCT (C) = Nominal operation cell temperature (C)
PGFV,M,STC (Wp) = Maximum power of a PV generator at STC or nominal power of a PV
generator
PINV,AC (W) = Inverter output nominal power
PINV,DC (W) = Inverter input nominal power
PMOD,M,STC (Wp) = Maximum power of a PV module at STC or nominal power of a PV
module
PR (adim.) = Performance ratio

Sm,AC (mm2) = Minimal cable cross-section of an AC cable as a function of the allowed
voltage drop
Sm,main. (mm2) = Minimal cable cross-section of the DC main cable (Sm,string, in mm2) as a
function of the allowed voltage drop
Sm,rstring (mm2) = Minimal cable cross-section of a string cable as a function of the
allowed voltage drop
Ta (C) = Ambient temperature
Tc (C) = Cell temperature
VINV,AC (V) = Inverter output nominal voltage
VINV,M (V) = Inverter input maximum voltage
VINV,m,MPP (V) = Lowest voltage at which the inverter tracks the MPP of the PV
generator
VINV,M,MPP (V) = Highest voltage at which the inverter tracks the MPP of the PV
generator
VMOD,M,STC (V) = PV module voltage at MPP at STC
VMOD,OC,STC (V) = PV module open circuit voltage at STC
51
4. Matching PVPP Typologies to Specific Terrains
Given the wide variety of existing PVPP system typologies and the numerous
peculiarities that characterize a marginal terrain type, providing some guidance to assess
which PVPP system typologies may suit best a specific marginal terrain type could be
found useful. Thus, a specific multivariable table might be completed using this
guidance. The following text has been extracted from the Strategic Vision Document
Rocky, sandy or subsidency terrain consistency is not advisable for any PVPP typology.
Obviously, terrains with risk presence geological, hydro or seismic- should be rejected.
Regarding cliviometry, high land slope -above 5%- hinders the deployment of PVPP
that use tracking techniques, but under certain boundaries, high land slope is a neutral
item in the case of static and semi static modules.
Terrains with indented surfaces must be avoided: this is a powerful barrier for the
necessary civil works to deploy a PVPP. Additionally, subsequent operation and
maintenance turns into a difficult task. Wet or waterlogged grounds do not pose an
obstacle for PVPPs. Regular surfaces are obviously the preferred ones.
As it may be easily understood, sites with high irradiation profiles will lead to a
substantial solar electricity production. Terrains with an annual average horizontal
irradiation below 900 kWh/m2 should be disregarded. If concentrator photovoltaic
(CPV) is to be installed, at least some annual average normal direct irradiation of 1800
kWh/m2 is required.
Severe shadowing should certainly be avoided, but energy losses caused by tiny
shadowing at the down and sunset in winter are negligible: in this case, the terrain
would be acceptable.
Solar cell performance benefits from cooling through forced convection by means of
wind, so in the case of static and semi static PVPP, moderate windy areas (maximum
wind speed of some 30-40 km/h) favour solar electricity production. However, highly
windy zones (frequent wind peaks above 60 km/h) are not suitable for PVPP that use
tracking techniques. In such zones, at best, the tracking systems will frequently change
52
their operation to the stow position and the energy yield will be negatively affected. At
worst, some of these systems can be seriously damaged.
The negative effect of dust was underestimated in PVPPs in the past. Recent studies
prove that energy losses up to some 15-20% might take place due to dust and dirtiness.
Consequently, dusty marginal terrains should be avoided. Besides, special attention
must be paid to the neighbouring areas of the marginal terrain where the PVPP is to be
deployed. For instance, arable surrounding areas in dry climates are not advisable.
If the marginal terrain climate is not too cloudy this would affect the annual average
horizontal irradiation- rain may help to keep the PV modules clean. Consequently,
moderate monthly average rainfall values (5-7 cm) are beneficial for any PVPP
typology.
Easy access to grid connection is highly advisable.
Easy road access to the marginal area is advisable for two reasons. First, transportation
of all the necessary material to deploy any PVPP will be much easier and less costly.
The same applies to the operation and maintenance tasks to be carried out through the
useful life of the PVPP.
Communication coverage Internet access availability, GPRS, etc- is increasingly

becoming important. Electric companies which in the end, buy the generated
electricity- usually force owners of large and relatively isolated PVPP in marginal
terrains to provide remote access to their energy meters
There is wide variety of possible PVPP system typologies whilst the peculiarities
that characterize a marginal terrain type are numerous. This turns matching the
former with the latter into a cumbersome task when approached using
multivariable tables.
53
This section is aimed at providing some guidance to assess which PVPP system
typologies may suit best a specific marginal terrain type.
54
5. Economic assessment on PV Grid-Connected systems
On-ground photovoltaic gridconnected systems (PVGCS) are becoming the most

popular application of the photovoltaic technology in developed countries. This is
mainly due to the governmental support programmes and policies launched by these
countries and a continuous decrease trend in photovoltaic (PV) cost. These policies are
implemented with financial incentives broadly fall into investment-focused (initial
investment subsidy, soft loans, income tax incentives, etc.) and generation-based (feed-
in tariffs (FIT), net metering, etc.) ones.
Firstly, in this section some available supporting measures for PVGCS and indicative
installed system prices of them in each project partner country are shortly reviewed.
Besides, some profitability indices of investment project applied of PVGCS have been
reviewed. More specifically, the internal rate of return (IRR), that provides some
straightforward meaningful information for the investor of these PV systems.
Estimation the IRR must be solved through non-analytical methods. This is why some
easy-to-use tables addressed to estimate the value of IRR are proposed in this section.
Finally, in this section it has been carried out an economic analysis of the PVGCS,
through the profitability index IRR. This analysis provides some figures for the IRR that
may enlighten a prospective PVGCS owner decision. In this analysis, for the sake of
simplicity, only initial investment subsidy, soft loans for the whole remaining initial
cost after the initial investment subsidy to be repaid in equal annual installments, feed-
in tariffs and the annual increase rate of the PV electricity price are considered in a first
approach for three specific cases (cases A, B and C, from now on) of possible
investments on PVGCS. In these cases, the effect of taxation has not been considered.
However, as ignoring completely the tax influence may lead to unrealistic results, a
brief analysis concerning the impact of taxation in these three cases (A,B and C) is
carried out. Last, some figures of IRR are shown for some cases of PVGCS with the
same initial investment and different financial incentives (soft loans, initial investment
subsidy and feed-in tariffs).
55
5.1. Representative figures of the cost of PVGCS in some countries
Table 5.1 provides some indicative installed system prices in some selected countries in
2008. However, it has to be kept in mind that on-ground PVGCS prices -such as those
the PVs in Bloom project deals with- have dramatically been reduced by some 35%
during the years 2007-2009. Some 3-6 Eur/Wp might be assumed as a more realistic
range for the cost of PVPPs in the project partner countries.
Table 5.1. Indicative installed PVGCS prices per Wp in various countries in 2008 (source: IEA, Trends in
photovoltaic applications survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2008, Report IEA-
PVPS T1-18:2009)
Country Grid-connected (EUR or USD per W)

<10 kW >10 kW
EUR USD EUR USD
AUS 5,1 7,3 7,5 10,8 3,9 5,6 5,8 8,3

AUT 4,8 5,8 7,1 8,5 4,8 5,5 7,1 8,1
CAN 3,8 4,4 5,6 6,5 3,8 5,1 5,6 7,5
CHE 6,0 6,4 8,8 9,4 5,2 5,4 7,6 7,9
DEU 3,9 4,5 5,7 6,6 3,7 5,4
DNK 4,7 11,4 6,9 16,7 6,7 13,3 9,8 19,6
ESP 7 7,5 10,3 11,0 5,7 6 8,4 8,8
FRA 7 8,3 10,3 12,2 5,1 6 7,5 8,8
GBR 4,2 12,6 6,2 18,5 5,0 9,9 7,3 14,5
ISR 4,1 5,1 6,0 7,5
ITA 5,5 6,5 8,1 9,6 4,2 5,5 6,2 8,1
JPN 4,7 6,9 3,5 5,2
KOR 4,1 5,7 6,1 8,4 5,7 8,4
MEX 8,4 12,4 5,8 8,5
MYS 4,9 7,2 4,9 7,2
NOR 10,8 14,4 15,9 21,2
PRT 56 7,4 8,8 4,2 6,2
SWE 9,9 14,5 6,9 10,2
TUR 4,5 6,6 4 5,9
USA 4,8 6,1 79 4,4 6,5
Notes: Excludes VAT and sales taxes. More expensive grid-connected system prices are
often associated with roof integrated slates or tiles or one-off building integrated
designs or single projects, and figures can also relate to a single project.
5.2 Existing supporting measures for PVPPs in each partner country
Some financial incentives for PVPPs, such as granting a subsidy per kWp capacity
installed or a payment per kWh produced and sold are available in developed countries.
In other words, these financial incentives broadly fall into investment-focused (buy-
down subsidy, soft loans, income tax incentives, etc.) and generation-based (enhanced
56
feed-in tariffs (FIT), net metering, etc.) ones. More specifically, some PV financial
incentives are detailed below:
Feed-in tariff: an explicit monetary reward is provided for producing PV

electricity; paid (usually by the electricity utility) at a rate per kWh somewhat
higher than the retail electricity rates being paid by the customer.
Capital subsidies: direct financial subsidies aimed at tackling the up-front cost
barrier, either for specific equipment or total installed PV system cost.
PV-specific green electricity schemes: allows customers to purchase green
electricity based on PV electricity from the electricity utility, usually at a
premium price.
Income tax credits: allows some or all expenses associated with PV installation
to be deducted from taxable income streams.
Commercial bank activities (Low-interest loans): includes activities such as
preferential home mortgage terms for houses including PV systems and
preferential green loans for the installation of PV systems.
Net metering: in effect the system owner receives retail value for any excess
electricity fed into the grid, as recorded by a bi-directional electricity meter and
netted over the billing period.
Net billing: the electricity taken from the grid and the electricity fed into the grid
are tracked separately, and the electricity fed into the grid is valued at a given
price.
In general, the last two financial incentives do not apply to PVPPs as all the PV-
generated electricity is fed and sold to the grid. More concretely, some available
supporting measures for PVGCS in each project partner country are shortly reviewed
below:
Austria
The kostromverordnung 2009 (eco electricity degree) set the following new tariffs for
2009 (only for PV systems covered by the kostromgesetz (Eco Electricty Law).
System size < 5 kW: 0.4598 /kWh
System size 5 to 10 kW: 0.3998 /kWh
System size > 10 kW: 0.2998 /kWh
57
For installations supported under the feed-in tariff scheme, 100 % of the specific tariff is
paid for the first 10 years. Afterwards, the tariff is cut to 75 % in year 11 and finally 50
% in year 12. After this period, only the gross sale price for electricity is paid. Some of
the Federal States have additional investment support schemes.
Greece
In January 2009 a new feed-in-tariff regime was introduced in Greece. The tariffs will
remain unchanged until August 2010 and are guaranteed for 20 years. However, if a
grid connection agreement is signed before that date, the unchanged FIT will be applied
if the system is finalized within the next 18 months.
Already filed applications for permits (> 3 GW) had to be served until the end of 2009.
The regime for new applications is not yet known.
Feed-in tariff [/kWh]:

Start of operation Mainland Grid Autonomous island grids
> 100 kWp 100 kWp > 100 kWp 100 kWp
February 2009: 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.50
August 2009: 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.50
February 2010: 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.50
August 2010: 0.392 0.441 0.441 0.49
From then on the degression of the tariffs for new systems will be 5% each half year.
A 40% grant will still be available on top of the new FITs for most of the systems
(minimum investment eligible for grant is 100,000).
New since 4 June 2009: rooftop PV systems up to 10 kWp (both for residential users
and small companies) receive 0.55 /kWh. Annual degression of 5% is foreseen for
newcomers as of 2012. This does not apply to PVPPs, obviously.
Regarding changes of PVs legislation, the pricing of electricity produced by

photovoltaic power is based on the data shown in Table 5.2
58
Table 5.2. Feed-in tariffs (/MWh) in Greece according to the date of commission of the PVGCS
YEAR MONTH GRID GRID NOT GRID

CONNECTED CONNECTED CONNECTED
(> 100 kW) (<= 100 kW)
> 100kW <=100kW
2010 February 400,00 450,00 450,00
2010 August 392,04 441,05 441,05
2011 February 372,83 419,43 419,43
2011 August 351,01 394,88 394,88
2012 February 333,81 375,53 375,53
2012 August 314,27 353,56 353,56
2013 February 298,87 336,23 336,23
2013 August 281,38 316,55 316,55
2014 February 268,94 302,56 302,56
2014 August 260,97 293,59 293,59
2015 => Previous year middle X 1,3 X 1,4 X 1,4

price of system
Italy
Feed-in tariffs are guaranteed by the GSE (Gestore Servizi Elettrici National Electrical
Services Management Body) for 20 years. According to article 6, comma 2, of the
Decree 19 february 2007, tariffs have been reduced by 2% from 2009 to 2010.
2009 Tariffs:
Nominal Power Ground installation Partially integrated Integrated in buildings
1 3 kWp 0.392 /kWh 0.431 /kWh 0.480 /kWh
3 20 kWp 0.372 /kWh 0.412 /kWh 0.451 /kWh
> 20 kWp 0.353 /kWh 0.392 /kWh 0.431 /kWh
2010 Tariffs:
Nominal Power Ground installation Partially integrated Integrated in buildings
1 3 kWp 0.384 /kWh 0.422 /kWh 0,470 /kWh
3 20 kWp 0.365 /kWh 0.403 /kWh 0,442 /kWh
> 20 kWp 0.346 /kWh 0.384 /kWh 0,422 /kWh
Focusing on ground installations, the target of PVs in BLOOM, for 2010 a bonus of 5%
of the tariff value exists for special cases (the bonuses cannot add up to each other):
59
in the case of a ground system where the 70% of the electricity is used up
directly by the producer or societies controlled by the producer
for plants that are owned by a public school or public health structure
for plants which are owned by local administrations with less than 5.000
inhabitants
Reduction of VAT from 20% to 10%
The incentive rates are combined with certain public benefits and contributions
(capital contributions up to 30% of investment cost) and the soft loans of 0.50%
under the Kyoto Fund (Article 1, paragraph 1111, 2007 Financial Law).
Enjoying the reduction of VAT cannot combine with tax deductions.
For 2011 the Government has announced the possibility of cutting back the tariffs by
another 20% maximum. Such percentage is currently under discussion by the Italian
Ministry for Economic Development and stakeholders from the PV national industry,
and it seems that the parties are reaching a compromise around a solution that could
foresee a gradual reduction of the tariff by 6% every 4 months, following the German
model.
Therefore, the installations connected to the grid by April 2011 could have tariff
reductions among 6.5 to 8.1%; those between April and August from 10% and 12.8%,
while those between August and December 2011 among 15% and 17.6%.
Also under discussion, for ground PV plants, is the bonus of 5% for installations in
marginal areas (the proposal of Decree mentions exhausted quarries, areas of relevance
to landfills, etc.).
Another 6 or 8% should be cut back every year starting from 2012. Innovative plants
could however benefit from a lower cut back (around 2% every year).
That of innovative plants (the category integrated photovoltaic systems with

innovative features) is a novelty that has been recently introduced and will benefit from
incentive rates (divided in three intervals of power) higher than the other categories. The
60
tariffs for innovative plants could be cut by 2% per year (instead of 6%) in 2012 and
2013. By 1 January 2011, the GSE will develop a guide on the features that these
innovative systems must have.
Also an increase in the total power for which incentives can be provided is under
discussion: it is foreseen that the ceiling will be raised from 2,000 MW in 2015 and
3,000 MW in 2016, with other 150 MW added for additional installations of plants with
concentration technology. The objective of national power to be installed by 2020 is set
at 8,000 MW.
Another change foreseen is the division of power plants in 5 classes: between 1 and 3
kW, between 3 to 20 kW, between 20 and 200 kW, between 200 to 1000 kW and over
1000 kW.
Moreover, welcoming the suggestion of producers to simplify the types of installation

(removing the category of partially integrated plants) the draft ministerial decree
foresees only two types: photovoltaic systems integrated in buildings and other
photovoltaic installations
Poland
There is no Feed in Tariff in Poland at this moment. Legislation considering Legislation
considering Energetic Law (Regulation of Minister for the Economy Coll. U. Nr 122,
poz. 1336, dated 15 December 2000; http://www.ure.gov.pl/portal.php?serwis=
pl&dzial= 195&id=882& search=25421) makes an obligation to the government to buy
any amount of green energy without any quantity restrictions. For selling such energy,
the producer is granted a green certificate which is sold in the stock exchange. The
average price of the green certificate equals 0.26 PLN/kWh (0.07 cent/kWh1).
As a result of actions taken under the PVs in Bloom project in Lublins region some
subsidies were introduced for those who want to invest on renewable energies.
Amount of subsidies for local governments is 3 million PLN for each investment.
1
Exchange rate: 1 = 3.88 PLN
61
Spain
Financial incentives applied to PVGCS at present (royal decree 1578/2008) are briefly
described below:
Installation types:
1.1. Systems in or on top of buildings with at most 20kW power
1.2. Systems in or on top of buildings with more than 20kW of power
2. Systems on undeveloped areas
Systems installed on the ground with more than 10MW and rooftop systems with more
than 2MW of power will not receive feed-in tariffs.
Cap for every type of installation (per year but quarterly sufficed):
1.1. 26.7MW
1.2. 240.3MW
2. 133MW, with an additional 100MW of installed power in 2009 and 60MW in
2010.
Tariffs (paid over 25 years):

1.1. 34 euro cents/kWh
1.2. 32 euro cents/kWh
2. 32 euro cents/kWh
Changes to the cap and tariff rates:

If at least 75% of a particular quarterly cap is exhausted, the tariff for the corresponding
installation type is decreased by at most 2.5%, while at the same time the amount of
available installable power is increased by the same amount.
If less than 50% of a cap is exhausted, the corresponding tariff increases, while the cap
decreases by an equal amount (without consideration of addition power). If the cap is
exhausted by between 50 and 75%, the tariffs and the amount of installable power
62
remains the same. Adjustments for installable power will be made on an annual basis
and the tariffs will be adjusted quarterly.
Slovakia
Feed-in tariff is set by Regulator each year. The new feed-in tariff for 2009 is 13.2
SKK/kWh (0.434 /kWh2) guaranteed for 12 years. In addition, PV, like all other RES,
qualifies for investment subsidies under the framework of the EU Structural funds.
2 Exchange rate: 1 = 30.396 SKK
5.3 Review of the most meaningful and understandable profitability

indices: the internal rate of return (IRR)
5.3.1. Introduction
From a strictly economic viewpoint, the purchase of a PVPP means an expenditure of

capital resources at a given time with the expectation of benefits in the form of solar
electricity yield to be paid/saved to/by the user over the useful life of the system.
As commented in other sections of this document, many financial mechanisms are

available in developed countries intended to promote PVPPs. However, for the sake of
simplicity, only initial investment subsidy, soft loans for the whole remaining initial
cost after the initial investment subsidy to be repaid in equal annual installments, feed-
in tariffs and the annual increase rate of the PV electricity price are considered in a first
approach for three specific cases (cases A, B and C, from now on) of possible
investments on PVPPs, leaving aside the effect of taxation. However, as ignoring
completely the tax influence may lead to unrealistic results, a brief analysis concerning
the impact of taxation in these three cases puts an end to this study.
5.3.2. A review of four profitability indices
The simple payback time (SPBT) of an investment project is the required number of
years for the inflows to equal the outflows of this project. Despite being easily
understandable, this profitability index does not take into account the moment over the
life of the project when these inflows and outflows take place, so it is a rather unrealistic
63
index (e.g.: a 3,000-Euro income in 2009 has more worth than a 3,000-Euro income in
2019). In this sense, it is preferred to deal with the discounted payback time (DPBT),
stated as the required number of years for the present worth of the inflows to equal the
present worth of the outflows (the present worth implies using an annual discount rate
and taking into account the annual inflation rate). Evidently, profitability means that the
discounted payback time should not exceed the serviceable life of the system. Although
it is also easily understandable and straightforward, this parameter does not consider the
cash flows that are produced after the DPBT. Hence, it may hide sound financial
opportunities for those deciding to invest on a PV system3.
The net present value (NPV, in ) of an investment project is the sum of present values
of all cash inflows (PW[CIF(N)], in , where N is the useful life of the PV system, in
years) and outflows related to the investment4 . Therefore, the parameter NPV equals the
present worth of the cash inflows from the system minus the life-cycle cost from the
user standpoint (LCCUSP). Thus:
NPV PW CIF( N ) LCC

L USP (5.1)
Obviously, a PVGCS should be viewed favourably if NPV > 0. However, this parameter
fails to choose among two projects with the same NPV but different initial costs and
duration.
The internal rate of return (IRR) of an investment project equals the actual interest rate
at which the project initial investment should be lent during its useful life to achieve the
same profitability5. Also, the internal rate of return (IRR) of an investment project is the
value of the interest rate that leads to NPV = 0. This is to say:
NPV P CIF( N )
PW LCCUSP 0 (5.2)
3
Perez R, Burtis L, Hoff T, Swanson S, Herig C. Quantifying residential PV economics in the US-
payback vs cash flow determination of fair energy value. Solar Energy 2004;77:363-366.
4
Lasnier F, Ang T. Photovoltaic engineering handbook. Great Yarmouth: Adam Hilger; 1990. p. 371-
399.
5
Chabot B. From cost to prices: economic analysis of photovoltaic energy and services. Progress in
Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 1998;6:55-68.
64
From an economic point of view, the PV system should be accepted if the IRR exceeds
a profitability threshold fixed by the future owner. In this sense, this parameter is very
important for the investor since it provides a meaningful estimation of the return of their
investment. The actual internal rate of return (IRRa) is derived from IRR by IRRa= (IRR-
g)/(1+g), where g is the annual inflation rate.
The value of the internal rate of return (IRR) for a given PV system, may be calculated
through both parameters LCCUSP and PW[CIF(N)]. When the life-cycle cost of the
system from the user standpoint and the present worth of cash inflows from the system
are equal, at the same value of d, the solution is found (IRR = d).
5.4 Easy-to-use tables to estimate the IRR
Unfortunately, equation (5.2) must be solved through non-analytical methods. This is

why some easy-to-use tables addressed to estimate the value of IRR are proposed in this
subsection (see Annex enclosed to this section). In fact, the internal rate of return (IRR)
equals the value of discount rate d that verifies equation (5.2). Values of IRR > 0 will be
feasible solutions from an economic point, provided that a certain profitability hurdle
set by the investor is reached.
Tables are used following the steps detailed below:
1. Choose the tables for the calculation of LCCUSP, according to the type of loan if any,
this is determined by the loan interest (il) and the loan duration (Nl)- addressed to partly
finance the initial investment. For the specific values of the initial investment (PVIN)
and the initial buy-down or subsidy (PVIS), find a group of values LCCUSP for several
values of discount rate d. Choose a value of d so that from this value of d, it follows a
value of LCCUSP.
2. Choose the tables for the calculation of PW[CIF(N)], according to the annual increase
rate of energy price ( pu). For the specific values of EPV and pu, find a group of values
PW[CIF(N)] for several values of discount rate d. Also choose the same value of d that
was chosen in step 1. Select the corresponding value of PW[CIF(N)].
3. Substract PW[CIF(N)] minus LCCUSP
4. Three cases may appear depending on the result of step 3:
65
4.1. If the result of step 3 is equal to zero, then IRR = d.
4.2. If the result of step 3 is negative, the discount rate d that is sought has a lower value
than that chosen in step 1. Therefore, return to step 1 and choose the nearest lower value
of d in this column. Iterations are continued until the difference obtained in step 3 turns
into positive. Then, the solution is found: the value of IRR lies within the values of d of
the last two iterations. The difference obtained in step 3 might not turn into positive at
the lowest value of d = 001 considered in the tables. This would mean that the PVGCS
project should be rejected since IRR < 0.
4.3. If the result of step 3 is positive, the discount rate d that is sought has a higher value
than that chosen in step 1. Therefore, return to step 1 and choose the nearest higher
value of d in this column. Iterations are continued until the difference obtained in step 3
turns into negative. Then, the solution is found: the value of IRR lies within the values
of d of the last two iterations. The difference obtained in step 3 might not turn into
negative at the highest value of d considered in the tables. In this case, the tables only
provide a lower bound for IRR which is equal to the last tried value of d.
5.4.1 Some examples

Giving a tutorial on how to calculate the IRR lies out of the scope of this document, but
the method to do this may be found in literature6,7. Nevertheless, providing some figures
for this profitability index in three specific cases may enlighten a prospective PVPP
owner decision. In this sense, some factors are involved in the calculation of the IRR
and -as it can easily be anticipated- they are mainly related to costs, incentives,
electricity yields and the annual increase rate of the PV electricity price. Finally, in
Table 5.3 are presented values of IRR for some cases of PVGCS with the same initial
investment and different financial incentives (soft loans, initial investment subsidy and
feed-in tariffs). The figures that configure each one of the three cases mentioned earlier
which refer to costs, incentives and electricity yields are commonly normalised-per-
6
Talavera DL, Nofuentes G, Aguilera J, Fuentes M. Tables for the estimation of the internal rate of
return of photovoltaic grid-connected systems. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 2007; 11:447-
466.
7
Nofuentes G, Aguilera J. and Muoz FJ. Tools for the Profitability Analysis of Grid-Connected
Photovoltaics. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2002;10:555-570.
66
kWp. Some values that characterize each one of the cases are given below, together
with the corresponding figure for the IRR:
Case A:
The normalised annual PV electricity yield ([EPV]kWp) is assumed equal to 1400
kWh kWp-1 year-1 .
The normalised initial investment in the PVGCS ([PVIN]kWp) is assumed equal to
6000 kWp-1 .
The corresponding price per kWh for PV-generated electricity sold to the grid
(pu), is fixed by law in different countries. It is assumed equal to 0.30 kWh-1
The annual increase rate of the PV electricity price ( pu) is assumed equal to 2%.
The normalised initial investment subsidy ([PVIS]kWp) is assumed equal to 17% of
[PVIN]kWp therefore [PVIS]kWp is assumed equal to 1000 kWp-1. It is worth
mentioning some countries provide capital subsidies ranging from 10 to 50
percent 8,9.
Consequently, the remaining sum [PVIN]kWp[PVIS]kWp is to be paid by the owner.
This amount is assumed to be borrowed at an annual loan interest il= 5% while the
loan term Nl is assumed equal to 10 years.
Use of the tables provided in the annex for this example:
1.- From table 2, column 4 (6000 kWp-1 ) and rows where [PVIS]kWp = 1000 kWp-1
are considered. Let us choose a value of d = 009, so that [LCCUSP]kWp = 4745 kWp-1 .
2.- From table 5, column 5 and rows where pu = 03 kWh-1 are considered. It follows
from the row corresponding to the same value of d = 009 that PW[CIF(N)]]kWp= 4956
kWp-1.
-1
3.- Let us subtract PW CIF( N ) LCC 2 kWp .
211
USP
4.-Since PW CIF( N ) LCC

L USP > 0, parameter IRR has a higher value. Therefore, let us
8
Martinot E. Renewable: Global status report. REN21 Renewable Energy Policy Network by The
Worldwatch Institute, 2005. Available
at:http://www.martinot.info/RE2005_Global_Status_Report.pdf(accessed November 2006).
9
Martinot E. Renewable: Global status report, Update. REN21 Renewable Energy Policy Network, 2006.
Available at:http://www.ren21.net/globalstatusreport/download/RE_GSR_2006_Update.pdf (accessed
September 2007).
67
return to step 1 and try with d = 011.
1.- From table 2, column 4 and rows where [PVIS]kWp = 1000 kWp-1 are considered
again. Let us choose a value of d = 011, so that [LCCUSP]kWp = 4319 kWp-1 .
2.- From table 5, column 5 and rows where pu = 03 kWh-1 are considered again. It
follows from the row corresponding to the same value of d = 011 that
PW[CIF(N)]]kWp= 4185 kWp-1.
3.- Let us subtract -1 .

PW CIF( N ) LCC 1 kWp
134
USP
4.- Since the difference obtained in step 3 turns into negative, the solution is found: the
value of IRR lies within 9-11%.
IRR in case A lies within a very attractive 9 - 11%. Let us choose a value of IRR=9% (most
unfavorable case).
Case B:
[EPV]kWp is assumed equal to 1200 kWh kWp-1 year-1.
[PVIN]kWp is assumed equal to 5000 kWp-1.
The corresponding price per kWh for PV-generated electricity paid/saved to/by
the owner (pu) is assumed equal to 0.20 kWh-1.
pu is assumed equal to 2% .
[PVIS]kWp is assumed equal to 1500 kWp-1.
This amount is assumed to be borrowed at an annual loan interest il= 5%, while the
loan term Nl is assumed equal to 20 years.
Tables 3 and 5 provided in the annex should be used for the calculation of LCCUSP and
PW[CIF(N)]. If the procedure described for case A is followed, IRR in case B equals an
attractive 5 - 7%. Let us choose a value of IRR=5% (most unfavorable case).
Case C:
[EPV]kWp is considered equal to 1000 kWh kWp-1 year-1 .
[PVIN]kWp is assumed equal to 4000 kWp-1 .
The corresponding price per kWh for PV-generated electricity paid/saved to/by
the owner (pu) is assumed equal to 0.20 kWh-1.
68
pu is assumed equal to 1%.
[PVIS]kWp is assumed equal to 25% of [PVIN]kWp, therefore [PVIS]kWp is assumed
equal to 1000 kWp-1 [7,9].
This amount is assumed to be borrowed at annual interest rate il= 5% over a term
equal to Nl= 20 years.
Tables 3 and 4 provided in the annex should be used for the calculation of LCCUSP and
PW[CIF(N)]. IRR in case C equals a fairly good 3 - 5%. Let us choose a value of IRR=3%
(most unfavorable case).
The analysis of some other cases may help achieve a better understanding. Table 5.3
shows values the IRR for PV Grid-Connected Systems with same initial investment and
different support measures.
Table 5.3. IRR for PVGCS with the same initial investment and different financial incentives.
[EPV]kWp [PVIN]kWp pu pu [PVIS] kWp Soft loans IRR

-1 -1
(kWh kWp-1 year-1) ( kWp ) ( kWh ) (%) ( kWp-1) Nl (years) (%)
il (%)
No available 5-7
1000
0.2 Nl=10 il=5 7-9
1200
4000 2 Non available Nl=10 il=5 3-5
0.3 Non available Non available 5-7

1400 0.2 Non available Non available 5-7
5.5. Short review of the taxation impact
As commented previously, the above cases have ignored the tax influence. However,
some basic issues concerning this influence will shortly be dealt with below to help
achieve an approach that tries not to conceal the effect of taxation. Anyway, it should be
kept in mind that the general assumptions that follow are reasonable, but taxation differs
considerably from country to country. However, tax exemptions have been left aside,
due to the wide differences concerning this issue also from country to country.
69
In general, most existing tax laws, consider that every owner of a PVPP must pay an
amount per annum, mostly attributable to the gains of the previous year. This amount
depends on the law defined tax coefficient, investment revenue, the annual operation
and maintenance cost, the debt repayment method, the asset amortization, etc.
The diversity of taxation systems according to each country makes it complex to

encompass this issue in our analysis. Anyway, several tax coefficient values -ranging
from 0% up to 40%- have been considered.10 In this subsection an analysis of the IRR
has been made by means of taking into account a tax coefficient, for the three
considered cases. In order to estimate the taxes, this coefficient has been applied to the
cash inflow from the PVPP, once the asset amortization, the interest payments of the
loan, and the operation and maintenance cost of the PVGCS are deducted. The asset
amortization has been considered lineal over the life cycle of the PVPP (25 years) and it
has been excluded from taxation. The results of the analysis in the base cases for
scenarios A, B and C are shown in figure 5.4. In this figure, the internal rate of return is
depicted vs the percentage tax coefficient. The IRR experiences a smooth and almost
linear decrease as the taxation coefficient increases. More specifically, when the latter
rises to 40%, the former is only decreased by 2.7% for case A, 1.4% for case B and
0.8% for case C.
10
Kaldellis JK, Vlachou DS, Korbakis G. Techno-economic evaluation of small hydro power plants in
Greece: a complete sensitivity analysis. Energy Policy 2005;33:1969-1985.
70
Figure 5.4. IRR (%) as a function of the percentage tax coefficient values for cases A (uppermost
line), B (medium line) and C (lowermost line)
71
A continuous decrease trend in PV costs together with a wide variety of supporting

measures have turned photovoltaic grid-connected systems (PVGCS) into a
profitable investment when some economic conditions are met.
On-ground PVGCS prices -such as those the PVs in Bloom project deals with- have
dramatically been reduced by some 35% during the years 2007-2009. Some 3-6
Eur/Wp might be assumed as a realistic range for the cost of PVPPs in the project
partner countries.
In Europe, different forms of financing for PVGCS have been defined and put into
effect in the last years. The most popular one in Europe are the feed-in tariff, capital
subsides and soft loans.
The internal rate of return (IRR) provides some straightforward meaningful
information for the investor of these PV systems.
This section presents some easy-to-use tables addressed to estimate the IRR
avoiding cumbersome calculations.
This analysis provides some figures for the IRR that may enlighten a prospective on-
ground PVGCS owner decision. Some figures are shown below, according to some
different scenarios:
[EPV]kWp [PVIN]kWp pu pu [PVIS] kWp Soft loans IRR

-1 -1
(kWh kWp-1 year-1) ( kWp ) ( kWh ) (%) ( kWp-1) Nl (years) (%)
il (%)
1000 1 1000 Nl=20 il=5 3-5
Non available 5-7

0.2 1000
4000 Nl=10 il=5 7-9
1200 Non available Nl=10 il=5 3-5
0.3 2 Non available Non available 5-7
5000 0.2 1500 Nl=20 il=5 5-7

1400 0.2 Non available Non available 5-7
1400 6000 0.3 1000 Nl=10 il=5 9-11
The analysis regarding taxation shows that IRR experiences a smooth and almost
linear decrease as the taxation coefficient increases from 0 to 40%.
72
APPENDIX I OF SECTION 5. TABLES ADDRESSED TO ESTIMATE THE IRR
Table 1. Life-cycle cost of the system per kWp from the user standpoint [LCCUSP]kWp, as a function of the initial
investment in the PVGCS per kWp ([PVIN]kWp), the nominal discount rate d and the initial investment subsidy per
kWp ([PVIS]kWp). No loans available.
[PVIS]kWp (/kWp) [PVIN]kWp (/kWp)

d 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
0 0,01 3661 4881 6101 7321 8542 9762
0,03 3522 4697 5871 7045 8219 9393
0,05 3423 4564 5705 6846 7987 9128
0,07 3350 4466 5583 6699 7816 8932
0,09 3295 4393 5491 6589 7688 8786
0,11 3253 4337 5421 6505 7590 8674
0,13 3220 4293 5366 6440 7513 8586
0,15 3194 4259 5323 6388 7452 8517
0,17 3173 4231 5288 6346 7404 8461
0,19 3156 4208 5260 6312 7364 8416
0,21 3142 4189 5236 6283 7330 8378
0,23 3130 4173 5216 6259 7303 8346
0,25 3120 4159 5199 6239 7279 8319
0,27 3111 4148 5185 6222 7259 8296
1000 0,01 1440 2661 3881 5101 6321 7542
0,03 2522 3697 4871 6045 7219 8393
0,05 2423 3564 4705 5846 6987 8128
0,07 2350 3466 4583 5699 6816 7932
0,09 2295 3393 4491 5589 6688 7786
0,11 2253 3337 4421 5505 6590 8517
0,13 2220 3293 4366 5440 6513 7586
0,15 2194 3259 4323 5388 6452 7517
0,17 2173 3231 4288 5346 6404 7461
0,19 2156 3208 4260 5312 6364 7416
0,21 2142 3189 4236 5283 6330 7378
0,23 2130 3173 4216 5259 6303 7346
0,25 2120 3159 4199 5239 6279 7319
0,27 2111 3148 4185 5222 6259 7296
1500 0,01 2161 3381 4601 5821 7042 8262
0,03 2022 3197 4371 5545 6719 7893
0,05 1923 3064 4205 5346 6487 7628
0,07 1850 2966 4083 5199 6316 7432
0,09 1795 2893 3991 5089 6188 7286
0,11 1753 2837 3921 5005 6090 7174
0,13 1720 2793 3866 4940 6013 7086
0,15 1694 2759 3823 4888 5952 7017
0,17 1673 2731 3788 4846 5904 6961
0,19 1656 2708 3760 4812 5864 6916
0,21 1642 2689 3736 4783 5830 6878
0,23 1630 2673 3716 4759 5803 6846
0,25 1620 2659 3699 4739 5779 6819
0,27 1611 2648 3685 4722 5759 6796
2000 0,01 1661 2881 4101 5321 6542 7762
0,03 1522 2697 3871 5045 6219 7393
0,05 1423 2564 3705 4846 5987 7128
0,07 1350 2466 3583 4699 5816 6932
0,09 1295 2393 3491 4589 5688 6786
0,11 1253 2337 3421 4505 5590 6674
0,13 1220 2293 3366 4440 5513 6586
0,15 1194 2259 3323 4388 5452 6517
0,17 1173 2231 3288 4346 5404 6461
0,19 1156 2208 3260 4312 5364 6416
0,21 1142 2189 3236 4283 5330 6378
0,23 1130 2173 3216 4259 5303 6346
0,25 1120 2159 3199 4239 5279 6319
0,27 1111 2148 3185 4222 5259 10034
2500 0,01 1161 2381 3601 4821 6042 7262
0,03 1022 2197 3371 4545 5719 6893
0,05 923 2064 3205 4346 5487 6628
0,07 850 1966 3083 4199 5316 6432
0,09 795 1893 2991 4089 5188 6286
0,11 753 1837 2921 4005 5090 6174
0,13 720 1793 2866 3940 5013 6086
0,15 694 1759 2823 3888 4952 6017
(Continued overleaf)
73
[PVIS]kWp (/kWp) [PVIN]kWp(/kWp)
d 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
2500 0,17 673 1731 2788 3846 4904 5961
0,19 656 1708 2760 3812 4864 5916
0,21 642 1689 2736 3783 4830 5878
0,23 630 1673 2716 3759 4803 5846
0,25 620 1659 2699 3739 4779 5819
0,27 611 1648 2685 3722 4759 5796
3000 0,01 661 1881 3101 4321 5542 6762
0,03 522 1697 2871 4045 5219 6393
0,05 423 1564 2705 3846 4987 6128
0,07 350 1466 2583 3699 4816 5932
0,09 295 1393 2491 3589 4688 5786
0,11 253 1337 2421 3505 4590 5674
0,13 220 1293 2366 3440 4513 5586
0,15 194 1259 2323 3388 4452 5517
0,17 173 1231 2288 3346 4404 5461
0,19 156 1208 2260 3312 4364 5416
0,21 142 1189 2236 3283 4330 5378
0,23 130 1173 2216 3259 4303 5346
0,25 120 1159 2199 3239 4279 5319
0,27 111 1148 2185 3222 4259 5296
3500 0,01 1381 2601 3821 5042 6262
0,03 1197 2371 3545 4719 5893
0,05 1064 2205 3346 4487 5628
0,07 966 2083 3199 4316 5432
0,09 893 1991 3089 4188 5286
0,11 837 1921 3005 4090 5174
0,13 793 1866 2940 4013 5086
0,15 759 1823 2888 3952 5017
0,17 731 1788 2846 3904 4961
0,19 708 1760 2812 3864 4916
0,21 689 1736 2783 3830 4878
0,23 673 1716 2759 3803 4846
0,25 659 1699 2739 3779 4819
0,27 648 1685 2722 3759 4796
4000 0,01 881 2101 3321 4542 5762
0,03 697 1871 3045 4219 5393
0,05 564 1705 2846 3987 5128
0,07 466 1583 2699 3816 4932
0,09 393 1491 2589 3688 4786
0,11 337 1421 2505 3590 4674
0,13 293 1366 2440 3513 4586
0,15 259 1323 2388 3452 4517
0,17 231 1288 2346 3404 4461
0,19 208 1260 2312 3364 4416
0,21 189 1236 2283 3330 4378
0,23 173 1216 2259 3303 4346
0,25 159 1199 2239 3279 4319
0,27 148 1185 2222 3259 4296
4500 0,01 1601 2821 4042 5262
0,03 1371 2545 3719 4893
0,05 1205 2346 3487 4628
0,07 1083 2199 3316 4432
0,09 991 2089 3188 4286
0,11 921 2005 3090 4174
0,13 866 1940 3013 4086
0,15 823 1888 2952 4017
0,17 788 1846 2904 3961
0,19 760 1812 2864 3916
0,21 736 1783 2830 3878
0,23 716 1759 2803 3846
0,25 699 1739 2779 3819
0,27 685 1722 2759 3796
74
kWp ([PVIS]kWp). Loan duration Nl = 10 years, il = 5%.
[PVIS]kWp (/kWp) [PVIN]kWp (/kWp)

d 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
0 0.01 4340 5787 7234 8681 10128 11574
0.03 3836 5115 6394 7673 8952 10231
0.05 3423 4564 5705 6846 7987 9128
0.07 3078 4104 5131 6157 7183 8209
0.09 2788 3717 4647 5576 6505 7435
0.11 2541 3388 4234 5081 5928 6775
0.13 2328 3104 3880 4656 5432 6208
0.15 2144 2858 3573 4288 5002 5717
0.17 1983 2644 3305 3966 4627 5288
0.19 1842 2455 3069 3683 4297 4911
0.21 1717 2289 2861 3433 4006 4578
0.23 1606 2141 2676 3212 3747 4282
0.25 1507 2009 2511 3013 3516 4018
0.27 1418 1891 2363 2836 3309 3781
1000 0.01 3114 4561 6007 7454 8901 10348
0.03 2732 4011 5289 6568 7847 9126
0.05 2423 3564 4705 5846 6987 8128
0.07 2169 3195 4221 5247 6273 7299
0.09 1957 2886 3816 4745 5674 6604
0.11 1778 2625 3472 4319 5166 5717
0.13 1625 2401 3177 3953 4729 5505
0.15 1494 2208 2923 3638 4352 5067
0.17 1380 2041 2702 3363 4023 4684
0.19 1280 1894 2507 3121 3735 4349
0.21 1192 1764 2336 2908 3481 4053
0.23 1114 1649 2184 2720 3255 3790
0.25 1044 1547 2049 2551 3053 3556
0.27 982 1455 1928 2400 2873 3345
1500 0.01 2501 3947 5394 6841 8288 9735
0.03 2179 3458 4737 6016 7295 8574
0.05 1923 3064 4205 5346 6487 7628
0.07 1714 2740 3766 4792 5818 6845
0.09 1541 2471 3400 4329 5259 6188
0.11 1397 2244 3090 3937 4784 5631
0.13 1274 2050 2826 3602 4378 5154
0.15 1169 1883 2598 3313 4027 4742
0.17 1078 1739 2400 3061 3722 4383
0.19 999 1613 2226 2840 3454 4068
0.21 929 1501 2074 2646 3218 3790
0.23 868 1403 1938 2473 3009 3544
0.25 813 1315 1818 2320 2822 3324
0.27 764 1237 1710 2182 2655 3128
2000 0.01 1887 3334 4781 6228 7675 9121
0.03 1627 2906 4185 5464 6742 8021
0.05 1423 2564 3705 4846 5987 7128
0.07 1259 2285 3311 4338 5364 6390
0.09 1126 2055 2984 3914 4843 5773
0.11 1015 1862 2709 3556 4403 5250
0.13 923 1699 2475 3251 4027 4803
0.15 844 1558 2273 2988 3702 4417
0.17 776 1437 2098 2759 3420 4081
0.19 718 1332 1945 2559 3173 3787
0.21 667 1239 1811 2383 2956 3528
0.23 622 1157 1692 2227 2763 3298
0.25 582 1084 1586 2089 2591 3093
0.27 547 1019 1492 1964 2437 6884
2500 0.01 1274 2721 4168 5614 7061 8508
0.03 1075 2354 3632 4911 6190 7469
0.05 923 2064 3205 4346 5487 6628
0.07 804 1831 2857 3883 4909 5935
0.09 710 1640 2569 3498 4428 5357
0.11 634 1481 2328 3175 4022 4868
0.13 571 1347 2123 2899 3675 4451
0.15 519 1233 1948 2663 3377 4092
75
[PVIS]kWp(/kWp) [PVIN]kWp (/kWp)
d 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
2500 0.17 475 1136 1797 2458 3119 3780
0.19 437 1051 1665 2278 2892 3506
0.21 404 976 1549 2121 2693 3265
0.23 376 911 1446 1981 2517 3052
0.25 351 853 1355 1857 2360 2862
0.27 329 801 1274 1747 2219 2692
3000 0.01 661 2108 3554 5001 6448 7895
0.03 522 1801 3080 4359 5638 6917
0.05 423 1564 2705 3846 4987 6128
0.07 350 1376 2402 3428 4454 5480
0.09 295 1224 2153 3083 4012 4941
0.11 253 1100 1946 2793 3640 4487
0.13 220 996 1772 2548 3324 4100
0.15 194 909 1623 2338 3052 3767
0.17 173 834 1495 2156 2817 3478
0.19 156 770 1384 1997 2611 3225
0.21 142 714 1286 1858 2431 3003
0.23 130 665 1200 1735 2271 2806
0.25 120 622 1124 1626 2129 2631
0.27 111 583 1056 1529 2001 2474
3500 0.01 1494 2941 4388 5835 7281
0.03 1249 2528 3807 5085 6364
0.05 1064 2205 3346 4487 5628
0.07 921 1947 2973 3999 5025
0.09 808 1738 2667 3596 4526
0.11 718 1565 2412 3259 4106
0.13 645 1421 2197 2973 3749
0.15 584 1298 2013 2727 3442
0.17 532 1193 1854 2515 3176
0.19 489 1103 1716 2330 2944
0.21 451 1024 1596 2168 2740
0.23 419 954 1489 2025 2560
0.25 391 893 1395 1897 2400
0.27 366 838 1311 1784 2256
4000 0.01 881 2328 3775 5221 6668
0.03 697 1975 3254 4533 5812
0.05 564 1705 2846 3987 5128
0.07 466 1492 2518 3545 4571
0.09 393 1322 2252 3181 4110
0.11 337 1184 2031 2878 3724
0.13 293 1069 1845 2621 3397
0.15 259 973 1688 2402 3117
0.17 231 892 1553 2214 2875
0.19 208 822 1436 2049 2663
0.21 189 761 1333 1906 2478
0.23 173 708 1243 1779 2314
0.25 159 662 1164 1666 2168
0.27 148 620 1093 1566 2038
4500 0.01 1714 3161 4608 6055
0.03 1423 2702 3981 5260
0.05 1205 2346 3487 4628
0.07 1037 2064 3090 4116
0.09 907 1836 2765 3695
0.11 802 1649 2496 3343
0.13 718 1494 2270 3046
0.15 648 1363 2077 2792
0.17 590 1251 1912 2573
0.19 541 1155 1768 2382
0.21 499 1071 1643 2215
0.23 462 997 1533 2068
0.25 430 933 1435 1937
0.27 403 875 1348 1821
76
kWp ([PVIS]kWp). Loan duration Nl = 20 years, il = 5%.

d 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
0 0.01 5005 6673 8341 10010 11678 13346
0.03 4104 5472 6840 8208 9576 10944
0.05 3423 4564 5705 6846 7987 9128
0.07 2900 3867 4833 5800 6766 7733
0.09 2492 3323 4154 4984 5815 6646
0.11 2170 2893 3616 4339 5063 5786
0.13 1911 2548 3185 3822 4459 5096
0.15 1701 2268 2835 3401 3968 4535
0.17 1528 2037 2546 3055 3565 4074
0.19 1384 1845 2306 2768 3229 3690
0.21 1263 1684 2104 2525 2946 3367
0.23 1160 1546 1933 2319 2706 3092
0.25 1071 1428 1786 2143 2500 2857
0.27 995 1327 1658 1990 2322 2653
1000 0.01 3557 5225 6893 8561 10230 11898
0.03 2910 4278 5646 7014 8382 9750
0.05 2423 3564 4705 5846 6987 8128
0.07 2050 3016 3983 4950 5916 6883
0.09 1760 2590 3421 4252 5083 5913
0.11 1531 2254 2977 3700 4424 4535
0.13 1347 1984 2621 3258 3895 4532
0.15 1198 1765 2332 2899 3466 4033
0.17 1076 1585 2095 2604 3113 3622
0.19 974 1436 1897 2358 2819 3281
0.21 889 1310 1731 2152 2572 2993
0.23 816 1203 1589 1976 2363 2749
0.25 754 1111 1468 1825 2183 2540
0.27 700 1032 1364 1695 2027 2358
1500 0.01 2833 4501 6169 7837 9506 11174
0.03 2313 3681 5049 6417 7785 9153
0.05 1923 3064 4205 5346 6487 7628
0.07 1625 2591 3558 4525 5491 6458
0.09 1393 2224 3055 3886 4716 5547
0.11 1211 1934 2658 3381 4104 4827
0.13 1065 1702 2339 2976 3613 4250
0.15 947 1514 2081 2648 3215 3782
0.17 850 1360 1869 2378 2887 3397
0.19 770 1231 1692 2154 2615 3076
0.21 702 1123 1544 1965 2386 2807
0.23 645 1031 1418 1804 2191 2577
0.25 595 953 1310 1667 2024 2381
0.27 553 885 1216 1548 1879 2211
2000 0.01 2109 3777 5445 7113 8782 10450
0.03 1716 3084 4452 5820 7188 8556
0.05 1423 2564 3705 4846 5987 7128
0.07 1200 2166 3133 4100 5066 6033
0.09 1027 1858 2689 3519 4350 5181
0.11 892 1615 2338 3061 3785 4508
0.13 784 1421 2058 2695 3332 3969
0.15 696 1263 1830 2397 2964 3531
0.17 625 1134 1643 2152 2662 3171
0.19 565 1026 1488 1949 2410 2871
0.21 515 936 1357 1778 2199 2620
0.23 473 860 1246 1633 2019 2406
0.25 437 794 1151 1508 1865 2222
0.27 406 737 1069 1400 1732 5555
2500 0.01 1385 3053 4721 6389 8058 9726
0.03 1119 2487 3855 5223 6591 7959
0.05 923 2064 3205 4346 5487 6628
0.07 775 1741 2708 3675 4641 5608
0.09 661 1492 2322 3153 3984 4815
0.11 572 1295 2019 2742 3465 4188
0.13 502 1139 1776 2413 3050 3687
0.15 445 1012 1579 2146 2713 3280
77
d 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
2500 0.17 399 908 1417 1927 2436 2945
0.19 361 822 1283 1744 2206 2667
0.21 328 749 1170 1591 2012 2433
0.23 301 688 1074 1461 1848 2234
0.25 278 635 992 1350 1707 2064
0.27 258 590 921 1253 1585 1916
3000 0.01 661 2329 3997 5665 7334 9002
0.03 522 1890 3258 4626 5994 7362
0.05 423 1564 2705 3846 4987 6128
0.07 350 1316 2283 3249 4216 5183
0.09 295 1125 1956 2787 3618 4448
0.11 253 976 1699 2422 3146 3869
0.13 220 857 1494 2131 2768 3405
0.15 194 761 1328 1895 2462 3028
0.17 173 682 1191 1701 2210 2719
0.19 156 617 1078 1540 2001 2462
0.21 142 563 983 1404 1825 2246
0.23 130 516 903 1289 1676 2062
0.25 120 477 834 1191 1548 1905
0.27 111 442 774 1106 1437 1769
3500 0.01 1605 3273 4941 6610 8278
0.03 1293 2661 4029 5397 6765
0.05 1064 2205 3346 4487 5628
0.07 891 1858 2824 3791 4758
0.09 759 1590 2421 3251 4082
0.11 656 1380 2103 2826 3549
0.13 575 1212 1849 2486 3123
0.15 510 1077 1644 2210 2777
0.17 456 966 1475 1984 2493
0.19 412 874 1335 1796 2257
0.21 376 797 1217 1638 2059
0.23 345 731 1118 1504 1891
0.25 318 675 1032 1389 1747
0.27 295 627 958 1290 1622
4000 0.01 881 2549 4217 5886 7554
0.03 697 2064 3432 4800 6168
0.05 564 1705 2846 3987 5128
0.07 466 1433 2399 3366 4333
0.09 393 1224 2054 2885 3716
0.11 337 1060 1783 2507 3230
0.13 293 930 1567 2204 2841
0.15 259 825 1392 1959 2526
0.17 231 740 1249 1758 2268
0.19 208 669 1130 1592 2053
0.21 189 610 1031 1451 1872
0.23 173 559 946 1333 1719
0.25 159 517 874 1231 1588
0.27 148 479 811 1143 1474
4500 0.01 1825 3493 5162 6830
0.03 1468 2835 4203 5571
0.05 1205 2346 3487 4628
0.07 1008 1974 2941 3908
0.09 857 1688 2519 3350
0.11 741 1464 2187 2910
0.13 648 1285 1922 2559
0.15 574 1141 1708 2275
0.17 514 1023 1533 2042
0.19 464 926 1387 1848
0.21 423 844 1265 1686
0.23 388 774 1161 1548
0.25 358 715 1072 1429
0.27 332 664 995 1327
78
Table 4. Present worth of cash inflows per kWp of a PVGCS ([PW[CIF(N)]]kWp) as a function of the annual yield per kWp of the system ([EPV]kWp) the discount rate d and the unitary price per
kWh (pu) to be paid/saved to/by the user (annual increase rate of energy price pu = 001).
[EPV]kWp (kWh/(kWp.year)) 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400
pu (/kWh) d
0.1 0.01 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000
0.03 1174 1566 1957 2348 2740 3131 3522 3914 4305 4697
0.05 941 1255 1569 1883 2196 2510 2824 3138 3451 3765
0.07 771 1028 1286 1543 1800 2057 2314 2571 2828 3085
0.09 645 860 1075 1290 1505 1720 1935 2149 2364 2579
0.11 549 732 915 1098 1281 1463 1646 1829 2012 2195
0.13 474 633 791 949 1107 1265 1423 1582 1740 1898
0.15 416 555 693 832 971 1109 1248 1387 1525 1664
0.17 369 492 615 738 861 984 1107 1231 1354 1477
0.19 331 441 552 662 773 883 993 1104 1214 1324
0.21 300 400 499 599 699 799 899 999 1099 1199
0.23 273 365 456 547 638 729 820 912 1003 1094
0.25 251 335 419 503 586 670 754 838 921 1005
0.27 232 310 387 465 542 620 697 774 852 929
0.2 0.01 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000
0.03 2348 3131 3914 4697 5479 6262 7045 7828 8610 9393
0.05 1883 2510 3138 3765 4393 5020 5648 6275 6903 7530
0.07 1543 2057 2571 3085 3600 4114 4628 5142 5657 6171
0.09 1290 1720 2149 2579 3009 3439 3869 4299 4729 5159
0.11 1098 1463 1829 2195 2561 2927 3293 3659 4024 4390
0.13 949 1265 1582 1898 2214 2531 2847 3163 3480 3796
0.15 832 1109 1387 1664 1941 2219 2496 2773 3051 3328
0.17 738 984 1231 1477 1723 1969 2215 2461 2707 2953
0.19 662 883 1104 1324 1545 1766 1987 2207 2428 2649
0.21 599 799 999 1199 1399 1598 1798 1998 2198 2398
0.23 547 729 912 1094 1276 1458 1641 1823 2005 2188
0.25 503 670 838 1005 1173 1340 1508 1675 1843 2010
0.27 465 620 774 929 1084 1239 1394 1549 1704 1859
0.3 0.01 4500 6000 7500 9000 10500 12000 13500 15000 16500 18000
0.03 3522 4697 5871 7045 8219 9393 10567 11741 12915 14090
0.05 2824 3765 4706 5648 6589 7530 8471 9413 10354 11295
0.07 2314 3085 3857 4628 5399 6171 6942 7714 8485 9256
0.09 1935 2579 3224 3869 4514 5159 5804 6448 7093 7738
0.11 1646 2195 2744 3293 3842 4390 4939 5488 6037 6586
0.13 1423 1898 2372 2847 3321 3796 4270 4745 5219 5694
0.15 1248 1664 2080 2496 2912 3328 3744 4160 4576 4992
0.17 1107 1477 1846 2215 2584 2953 3322 3692 4061 4430
0.19 993 1324 1655 1987 2318 2649 2980 3311 3642 3973
0.21 899 1199 1498 1798 2098 2398 2697 2997 3297 3596
0.23 820 1094 1367 1641 1914 2188 2461 2735 3008 3281
0.25 754 1005 1256 1508 1759 2010 2261 2513 2764 3015
0.27 697 929 1162 1394 1626 1859 2091 2323 2555 2788
79
pu (/kWh) d
0.4 0.01 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 22000 24000
0.03 4697 6262 7828 9393 10959 12524 14090 15655 17221 18786
0.05 3765 5020 6275 7530 8785 10040 11295 12550 13805 15060
0.07 3085 4114 5142 6171 7199 8228 9256 10285 11313 12342
0.09 2579 3439 4299 5159 6019 6878 7738 8598 9458 10318
0.11 2195 2927 3659 4390 5122 5854 6586 7317 8049 8781
0.13 1898 2531 3163 3796 4429 5061 5694 6327 6959 7592
0.15 1664 2219 2773 3328 3883 4437 4992 5547 6101 6656
0.17 1477 1969 2461 2953 3446 3938 4430 4922 5414 5907
0.19 1324 1766 2207 2649 3090 3532 3973 4415 4856 5297
0.21 1199 1598 1998 2398 2797 3197 3596 3996 4395 4795
0.23 1094 1458 1823 2188 2552 2917 3281 3646 4011 4375
0.25 1005 1340 1675 2010 2345 2680 3015 3350 3685 4020
0.27 929 1239 1549 1859 2168 2478 2788 3098 3407 3717
0.5 0.01 7500 10000 12500 15000 17500 20000 22500 25000 27500 30000
0.03 5871 7828 9784 11741 13698 15655 17612 19569 21526 23483
0.05 4706 6275 7844 9413 10981 12550 14119 15688 17256 18825
0.07 3857 5142 6428 7714 8999 10285 11570 12856 14141 15427
0.09 3224 4299 5374 6448 7523 8598 9673 10747 11822 12897
0.11 2744 3659 4573 5488 6403 7317 8232 9147 10061 10976
0.13 2372 3163 3954 4745 5536 6327 7117 7908 8699 9490
0.15 2080 2773 3467 4160 4853 5547 6240 6933 7627 8320
0.17 1846 2461 3076 3692 4307 4922 5537 6153 6768 7383
0.19 1655 2207 2759 3311 3863 4415 4966 5518 6070 6622
0.21 1498 1998 2497 2997 3496 3996 4495 4995 5494 5994
0.23 1367 1823 2279 2735 3190 3646 4102 4558 5013 5469
0.25 1256 1675 2094 2513 2932 3350 3769 4188 4607 5026
0.27 1162 1549 1936 2323 2710 3098 3485 3872 4259 4646
0.6 0.01 9000 12000 15000 18000 21000 24000 27000 30000 33000 36000
0.03 7045 9393 11741 14090 16438 18786 21134 23483 25831 28179
0.05 5648 7530 9413 11295 13178 15060 16943 18825 20708 22590
0.07 4628 6171 7714 9256 10799 12342 13884 15427 16970 18512
0.09 3869 5159 6448 7738 9028 10318 11607 12897 14187 15476
0.11 3293 4390 5488 6586 7683 8781 9878 10976 12073 13171
0.13 2847 3796 4745 5694 6643 7592 8541 9490 10439 11388
0.15 2496 3328 4160 4992 5824 6656 7488 8320 9152 9984
0.17 2215 2953 3692 4430 5168 5907 6645 7383 8122 8860
0.19 1987 2649 3311 3973 4635 5297 5960 6622 7284 7946
0.21 1798 2398 2997 3596 4196 4795 5394 5994 6593 7193
0.23 1641 2188 2735 3281 3828 4375 4922 5469 6016 6563
0.25 1508 2010 2513 3015 3518 4020 4523 5026 5528 6031
0.27 1394 1859 2323 2788 3252 3717 4182 4646 5111 5576
80
Table 5. Present worth of cash inflows per kWp of a PVGCS ([PW[CIF(N)]]kWpp) as a function of the annual yield per kWp of the system ([EPV]kWp) the discount rate d and the unitary price per
kWh (pu) to be paid/saved to/by the user (annual increase rate of energy price pu = 002).
pu (/kWh) d
0.1 0.01 1709 2279 2849 3419 3988 4558 5128 5698 6267 6837
0.03 1325 1766 2208 2649 3091 3532 3974 4415 4857 5298
0.05 1052 1402 1753 2103 2454 2804 3155 3506 3856 4207
0.07 854 1139 1423 1708 1993 2277 2562 2847 3131 3416
0.09 708 944 1180 1416 1652 1888 2124 2360 2596 2832
0.11 598 797 996 1196 1395 1594 1794 1993 2192 2392
0.13 513 684 856 1027 1198 1369 1540 1711 1882 2053
0.15 447 596 746 895 1044 1193 1342 1491 1640 1789
0.17 395 526 658 790 921 1053 1184 1316 1448 1579
0.19 352 470 587 705 822 940 1057 1175 1292 1409
0.21 318 423 529 635 741 847 953 1059 1165 1270
0.23 289 385 481 577 674 770 866 962 1059 1155
0.25 264 353 441 529 617 705 793 881 970 1058
0.27 244 325 406 488 569 650 731 813 894 975
0.2 0.01 3419 4558 5698 6837 7977 9116 10256 11395 12535 13674
0.03 2649 3532 4415 5298 6181 7065 7948 8831 9714 10597
0.05 2103 2804 3506 4207 4908 5609 6310 7011 7712 8413
0.07 1708 2277 2847 3416 3985 4555 5124 5693 6263 6832
0.09 1416 1888 2360 2832 3304 3776 4248 4720 5192 5664
0.11 1196 1594 1993 2392 2790 3189 3587 3986 4384 4783
0.13 1027 1369 1711 2053 2396 2738 3080 3422 3765 4107
0.15 895 1193 1491 1789 2087 2386 2684 2982 3280 3578
0.17 790 1053 1316 1579 1842 2106 2369 2632 2895 3158
0.19 705 940 1175 1409 1644 1879 2114 2349 2584 2819
0.21 635 847 1059 1270 1482 1694 1906 2117 2329 2541
0.23 577 770 962 1155 1347 1540 1732 1925 2117 2310
0.25 529 705 881 1058 1234 1410 1587 1763 1939 2116
0.27 488 650 813 975 1138 1300 1463 1625 1788 1950
0.3 0.01 5128 6837 8546 10256 11965 13674 15383 17093 18802 20511
0.03 3974 5298 6623 7948 9272 10597 11921 13246 14571 15895
0.05 3155 4207 5258 6310 7362 8413 9465 10517 11568 12620
0.07 2562 3416 4270 5124 5978 6832 7686 8540 9394 10248
0.09 2124 2832 3540 4248 4956 5664 6372 7079 7787 8495
0.11 1794 2392 2989 3587 4185 4783 5381 5979 6577 7175
0.13 1540 2053 2567 3080 3594 4107 4620 5134 5647 6160
0.15 1342 1789 2237 2684 3131 3578 4026 4473 4920 5368
0.17 1184 1579 1974 2369 2764 3158 3553 3948 4343 4737
0.19 1057 1409 1762 2114 2467 2819 3171 3524 3876 4228
0.21 953 1270 1588 1906 2223 2541 2858 3176 3494 3811
0.23 866 1155 1444 1732 2021 2310 2599 2887 3176 3465
0.25 793 1058 1322 1587 1851 2116 2380 2644 2909 3173
0.27 731 975 1219 1463 1706 1950 2194 2438 2682 2925
81
pu (/kWh) d
0.4 0.01 6837 9116 11395 13674 15953 18232 20511 22790 25069 27348
0.03 5298 7065 8831 10597 12363 14129 15895 17661 19427 21194
0.05 4207 5609 7011 8413 9816 11218 12620 14022 15424 16827
0.07 3416 4555 5693 6832 7971 9109 10248 11387 12525 13664
0.09 2832 3776 4720 5664 6607 7551 8495 9439 10383 11327
0.11 2392 3189 3986 4783 5580 6377 7175 7972 8769 9566
0.13 2053 2738 3422 4107 4791 5476 6160 6845 7529 8214
0.15 1789 2386 2982 3578 4175 4771 5368 5964 6561 7157
0.17 1579 2106 2632 3158 3685 4211 4737 5264 5790 6317
0.19 1409 1879 2349 2819 3289 3759 4228 4698 5168 5638
0.21 1270 1694 2117 2541 2964 3388 3811 4235 4658 5082
0.23 1155 1540 1925 2310 2695 3080 3465 3850 4235 4620
0.25 1058 1410 1763 2116 2468 2821 3173 3526 3878 4231
0.27 975 1300 1625 1950 2275 2600 2925 3250 3575 3900
0.5 0.01 8546 11395 14244 17093 19942 22790 25639 28488 31337 34185
0.03 6623 8831 11038 13246 15454 17661 19869 22077 24284 26492
0.05 5258 7011 8764 10517 12269 14022 15775 17528 19281 21033
0.07 4270 5693 7117 8540 9963 11387 12810 14233 15657 17080
0.09 3540 4720 5900 7079 8259 9439 10619 11799 12979 14159
0.11 2989 3986 4982 5979 6975 7972 8968 9965 10961 11958
0.13 2567 3422 4278 5134 5989 6845 7701 8556 9412 10267
0.15 2237 2982 3728 4473 5219 5964 6710 7455 8201 8946
0.17 1974 2632 3290 3948 4606 5264 5922 6580 7238 7896
0.19 1762 2349 2936 3524 4111 4698 5286 5873 6460 7047
0.21 1588 2117 2647 3176 3705 4235 4764 5293 5823 6352
0.23 1444 1925 2406 2887 3368 3850 4331 4812 5293 5775
0.25 1322 1763 2204 2644 3085 3526 3967 4407 4848 5289
0.27 1219 1625 2031 2438 2844 3250 3657 4063 4469 4876
0.6 0.01 10256 13674 17093 20511 23930 27348 30767 34185 37604 41023
0.03 7948 10597 13246 15895 18544 21194 23843 26492 29141 31790
0.05 6310 8413 10517 12620 14723 16827 18930 21033 23137 25240
0.07 5124 6832 8540 10248 11956 13664 15372 17080 18788 20496
0.09 4248 5664 7079 8495 9911 11327 12743 14159 15575 16991
0.11 3587 4783 5979 7175 8370 9566 10762 11958 13153 14349
0.13 3080 4107 5134 6160 7187 8214 9241 10267 11294 12321
0.15 2684 3578 4473 5368 6262 7157 8052 8946 9841 10735
0.17 2369 3158 3948 4737 5527 6317 7106 7896 8685 9475
0.19 2114 2819 3524 4228 4933 5638 6343 7047 7752 8457
0.21 1906 2541 3176 3811 4446 5082 5717 6352 6987 7622
0.23 1732 2310 2887 3465 4042 4620 5197 5775 6352 6929
0.25 1587 2116 2644 3173 3702 4231 4760 5289 5818 6347
0.27 1463 1950 2438 2925 3413 3900 4388 4876 5363 5851
82
APPENDIX II OF SECTION 5: TERMINOLOGY
[EPV]kWp Normalised (per kWp) annual PV electricity yield (kWhkWp -1yr-1).

[LCCUSP]kWp Normalised (per kWp) life cycle cost of the PVGCS from the user standpoint
(kWp-1).
[PVIS ]kWp Normalised (per kWp) initial buy-down or subsidy (kWp-1).
[PVIN]kWp Normalised (per kWp) initial investment on the PVGCS (kWp-1).
[PW[CIF(N)]]kWp Normalised (per kWp) present worth of the cash inflows from a PVGCS through its
useful life (kWp-1).
d Nominal discount rate.
EPV Annual PV electricity yield (kWh).
il Annual loan interest.
g Annual inflation rate.
IRR Internal rate of return.
LCCUSP Life - cycle cost of the PVGCS from the user standpoint ().
N Useful life of the PVGCS (years).
Nl Time duration of loan (years).
NPV Net present value ().
pu PV-electricity unitary price paid/saved to/by the user (kWh-1)
PVIS Initial buy-down or subsidy ().
PVIN Initial investment on the PVGCS ().
PW[CIF(N)] Present worth of the cash inflows from a PVGCS through its useful life ().
pu Annual increase rate of the energy price consumed/sold from/to the grid
APPENDIX: MAIN TECHNICAL AND CONTRACTUAL POINTS TO BE

CHECKED AND COMPARED WHEN EXAMINING A PROPOSAL FROM AN
EPC SUPPLIER
This appendix is aimed at verifying through cross-checks if the EPC (engineering,

procurement and construction) supplier proposal is sound. It must be borne in mind the
high important of this hot issue. Making sure that a proposal guarantees a minimum
production, a long-lasting durability and reliability is the key to avoid
misunderstandings and future litigations.
Some examples of these cross-checks are provided below:
Is the EPC supplier experienced and skilled? Unskilled PVPPs EPC suppliers
are not infrequent, unfortunately
83
Is a minimum electricity production per kWp guaranteed? Is this production
clearly linked to an easily measurable parameter (e.g.: irradiation measured by
an external and independent body)? Avoid production warranties related to
performance indices which are difficult and not straightforward to understand
and measure (e.g.: performance ratio)
Are protective measures suitably sized and planned in the proposal? Fuses,
voltage surge arrestors, good metal works earthening, etc. sometimes are
omitted or wrongly sized
Is the operation and maintenance contract (O&M, usually offered by the EPC
supplier) clear and rigorous?
Does the contract include a reliable insurance (min.100% insurance coverage:

theft, natural disasters, vandalism, etc.)?
Is the EPC supplier willing to let the PVPP undergo a quality check (careful
visual inspection, measuring the actual PV generator peak power, measuring
earth electrode resistance, IR imaging analysis, etc. by an external body
(University, Accredited Independent Laboratory, etc.) once this PVPP has been
deployed?
Do PV modules comply with IEC 60215 standard?
Are modules undetachably labeled with their serial number?
Is (Are) the inverter(s) TV certified?
Is the module manufacturer acceptable for taking money on loan from a bank?
Prospective owners are usually refused credit if emerging technologies are used
in the EPC proposal (thin film, concentrating PV, etc.)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank the following people for their valuable help to prepare this
text:
D. Bedin and E. Holland (Union of Veneto Chambers of Commerce)
G. Dovigi (Italian-Slovak Chamber of Commerce)
84
J. Olchowik, K. Cyeslak and M. Sordyl (Institute of Physics of Lublin
University of Technology)
G. Agrigiannis (Development Company of Municipality of Milies)
85
*4#/

TH - English PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TH - English PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

5&$)/*$"-)"/%#00,

The installation of on-ground photovoltaic plants over marginal areas

G. Nofuentes, J. V. Muoz, D. L. Talavera, J. Aguilera and J. Terrados

1. PV Grid-Connected Systems Basics

2. Estimating The Annual Energy Produced by a PV Grid-Connected

3. Sizing PV Grid-Connected Systems

4. Matching PVPP Typologies to Specific Terrains

5. Economic Assessment on PV Grid-Connected Systems

APPENDIX I OF SECTION 5. TABLES ADDRESSED TO ESTIMATE

APPENDIX II OF SECTION 5: TERMINOLOGY

Appendix: Main technical and contractual points to be checked and

After this short approach to PVGCS a more in-depth study is to be accomplished

1.2 . Parts of PV Grid-Connected Systems

1. PV modules, usually termed PV generator (some PV modules connected in

(1) PV modules (2) Inverter (3) Metering device

Figure 1.3. Simplified layout of a grid-connected PV system.

Crystalline silicon technologies.

Thin film cells

Cadmium telluride (CdTe) is a thin-film material produced by deposition or by

Table 1.1. Main characteristics of commercial solar cells

1.2.1.3. Connection boxes

PVGCS using inverters up to a power of 5 kW usually are usually single-phase systems.

1.2.2.2. Energy meters

1.2.3 Metal works and earth electrode

A widespread technical solution aimed at deploying large-scale PVPPs (with rated

Two 120-kWp Two 100-kW

BRIEF SUMMARY OF SECTION 1

Throughout section 1 the main features of a photovoltaic grid connected system

Some electrical characteristics of a typical 1-MWp PVPP are provided to help

Although the cost of a typical on-ground PV installation ranging from 50 kWp to 2

2.1 Assessment on the solar resource of the site

Before starting to introduce how to evaluate the solar resource, it is interesting to

Last, the NASA website (http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/sse/) provides online Irradiation

2.2. Estimating the annual electricity yield of a PV grid-connected system

A system is said to be 1-kWp rated if its PV generator produces 1 kW under Standard

E PV [ kWh yearr 1 ] H ( , ))[ kWhm 2 yearr 1 ] P* [ kWp ] PR (2.4)

A commonly used parameter to assess the amount of solar electricity produced by a

Place Latitude, longitude Optimal tilt angle () Yf, (kWhkWp-1year-1)

Adamow (Poland) 50.595N, 23.15E 35

Burgau (Austria) 48.432N, 10.41E 36

Drahovce 48.518N, 17.80E 35

Valencia 39.470N, -0.377E 35

BRIEF SUMMARY OF SECTION 2

Explaining how to calculate the solar irradiaton collected on a surface with a

E PV [ kWh yearr 1 ] H ( , ))[ kWhm 2 yearr 1 ] P* [ kWp ] PR

Where P* = PV generator power in STC and PR = performance ratio (0.7-0.8)

3.1. Choosing the PV module

1 kWp 10 m2 of required surface (crystalline silicon) if the PV modules are deployed in

1 kWp 20 m2 of required surface (crystalline silicon) if the PV modules are deployed

Maximum efficiency (adim) INV,M

Power factor (adim) cos

3.2. Sizing the nominal power of the PV generator

The PV generator is composed by arranging parallel connections between series-

3.3. Sizing the nominal power of the inverter

3.4. Sizing the number of PV modules

In principle, if a nominal power of the PV generator given by PGFV,M,STC is to be

3.5. Sizing the number of series-connected modules

3.5.1. Maximum number of series-connected modules

VMOD ,OC (Tc 7

If VMOD,OC is expressed in C-1, eq. (3.3) turns into:

VMOD ,OC (Tc 70

VMOD ,OC (Tc 10

3.5.2. Minimum number of series-connected modules