Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vinay K. Singh*
commonly used as binders. Urea formaldehyde is the most at 8 wt% of hardener (HY-951) when mixed with resin (CY-
economic and useful adhesive among these binders. 230). Therefore in the present study 8 wt% of HY-951 has
The aim in the preset investigation with the objectives been used.
was to develop a composite material containing different
percentages of walnut particle as the filler material and
investigate the mechanical behavior of different composites. 2.3.2 Walnut particles
It was mixed with the resin up to the limits and the flow-
ability of the mixture was maintained for the purpose of
2 Materials and methods pouring the mixture into the vertical mould. No compres-
sion load was applied in this arrangement. The size of the
2.1 Matrix material walnut particles was controlled by sieving with ASTM 40
and ASTM 80.
2.1.1 Epoxy resin CY-230
2.3 Optimization of weight percentage Density is one of the most important properties of the par-
ticle board material. The density of walnut particles rein-
2.3.1 Hardener (HY-951) forced composite for various weight percentages along
with density of epoxy resin are presented in Table 1.
According to Misra and Singh [22] the per cent elongation, Table 1 reveals that increase in weight percentage of
yield strength and Young modulus reached the maximum reinforced particles, i.e., the walnut particles in the resin
S. no. Walnut particle Walnut particle Walnut particle Walnut particle Epoxy
(10 wt%) (15 wt%) (20 wt%) (25 wt%) (g/cm3)
(g/cm3) (g/cm3) (g/cm3) (g/cm3)
solution decreases the density. This decrease in density of properties of the composite. In the present investiga-
25 wt% is about 1% of 10 wt%. The decrease in density can tion SEM was carried out on LEO435V6 instrument and
be related to the fact that the walnut particles are light but voltage was kept 20kV for bio composite containing dif-
occupy a substantial amount of space. Hence there is a ferent weight percentage of walnut particles to evaluate
general decrease in the density of all the composite mate- the particle size, particle matrix interface and dispersion
rials with regard to the epoxy resin. of walnut particles in the epoxy resin matrix.
Figure 1(A) and 1(B) show the SEM micrographs of dif-
ferent bio composite material investigated in the present
3.2 Water absorption capacity work. In all cases, good dispersion of walnut particles in
the resin matrix has been observed. Figure 1(A) and 1(B)
Water absorption capacity is another crucial factor to be show the SEM micrograph of composite containing 10
taken into account when considering the effect of water wt% and 25 wt% of walnut particles, respectively. It is
on the composite material developed. The soaking period seen in the figures that walnut particles are well dispersed
is 24h taken as constant for all combinations of material. in the epoxy resin matrix in a preferred orientation.
The effect is presented in Table 2. Hence, from the above micrographs it is can be con-
The effect of water absorption was important in case cluded that due to uniform dispersion of walnut particles
the material that has been developed when used for appli- in epoxy resin, a remarkable effect on the mechanical
cations comes in contact of water. The water absorption properties may be obtained.
capacity was found to be higher for 25 wt% of walnut par-
ticle reinforced composite as compared with lower weight
percentage of walnut particles. This substantial increase 3.4 Mechanical properties
with regard to the epoxy resin could be because the
walnut particles here have maximum capacity for water 3.4.1 Tensile stress-strain curve
absorption compared to the resin particles.
The mechanical properties of the walnut particles filled
epoxy resin bio composite materials were determined
3.3 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) by a 100 kN ADMET Servo hydraulic Universal Testing
Machine at 1 mm/min strain rate under displacement
The state of dispersion of particles into the resin matrix control mode. The tensile stress-strain curve for walnut
plays a significant role with regard to the mechanical particles reinforced composite materials containing
S. no. Walnut particle Walnut particle Walnut particle Walnut particle Epoxy resin
(10 wt%) (15 wt%) (20 wt%) (25 wt%)
180
160
140
120
Stress (MPa)
100
80
0
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09
Strain
Figure 2Stress-strain diagram under tension for different wt% of walnut particles.
percentage elongation. The ultimate tensile strength and Ultimate strength (MPa) = -0.058Vf3 + 3.42Vf2
the modulus of elasticity of 10 wt% of walnut board are -66.43Vf + 544 (2)
almost 1.37 and 1.45 times higher than 15 wt% walnut
board, 1.43 and 1.51 times higher than 20 wt% walnut
board and 1.57 and 1.52 times higher than 25 wt% walnut 3.4.3 Compressive strength
board. It is true for all particulate composite material;
no material can be fabricated which has more ultimate The compressive strength properties of the walnut particle
strength from matrix material if reinforced material is filled epoxy resin composite materials were determined
mixed at macro level. These behaviors are also shown in by 100 kN ADMET Servo controlled Universal Testing
Figure 3. machine at 1 mm/min strain rate under displacement
On the basis of results obtained the effect of weight control mode.
fraction (Vf ) on modulus of elasticity and ultimate strength The results of the compressive test are shown in
are shown in Equations 1 and 2 with a correlation coeffi- Table 4. All tests were conducted under displacement
cient greater than 0.99. control mode. Stress strain diagram obtained from com-
pressive test is shown in Figure 4.
Modulus of elasticity (MPa) = -0.69Vf3 + 42.44Vf2
A remarkable difference can be noticed in the value of
-858.1Vf + 7040.0 (1)
the compressive strength with different weight percentage
205 9.0
190
Ultimate strength, Modulus of elasticity
8.5
175
Ultimate strength, MPa
Elongation (%)
145
7.5
130
7.0
115
100 6.5
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Walnut particles (wt%)
Figure 3Variation of ultimate tensile strength, modulus of elasticity and elogation for different weight percentage of walnut reinforced
composite.
300
Ultimate strength (MPa)=-8.36Vf +350.8. (4)
250
Stress (MPa)
150
As known, hardness implies a resistance to indentation,
permanent or plastic deformation of material. In a bio
100 10 wt% of walnut particle
15 wt% of walnut particle
composite material, filler weight fraction significantly
20 wt% of walnut particle affects the hardness value of the hybrid composite mate-
50 25 wt% of walnut particle
rial. Hardness values measured on the Rockwell M-scale
0
showing the effect of weight percentage of walnut par-
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 ticles on the hardness values of hybrid composite are
Strain
presented in Table 5. Variation of hardness with walnut
Figure 4Stress-strain diagram under compression for different particles weight percentage is shown in Figure 6.
wt% of walnut particles. It is found that hardness of neat epoxy resin (CY-230
+8 wt% of HY-951) is 56.4 MRH. The hardness of the fab-
ricated composite made of epoxy resin and 25 wt% is the
composition of walnut particle. It can be noticed that
maximum and is 89.8 MRH. The hardness increases with
addition of walnut particle improves the modulus of elas-
increase in walnut particles weight percentage. Figure 7
ticity of composite materials. It is found that ultimate com-
shows that with increasing of hardness, ultimate strength
pressive strength of 10 wt% of walnut is about 261.0 MPa.
in compression as well tension deceases and material
But increase in weight percentage of walnut particles, the
behaved in a brittle manner.
ultimate strength decreases considerably. Hence, taking
into consideration the requirement and the cost effective-
ness various composition of the reinforced material can be Table 5Rockwell hardness values on M-scale for various filled
taken. Variation in ultimate strength, percentage reduc- hybrid composites.
tion in length and modulus of elasticity with respect to
S. no Walnut Walnut Walnut Walnut Resin
different weight percentage walnut reinforced composite
(10 wt%) (15 wt%) (20 wt%) (25 wt%)
are shown in Figure 5.
On the basis of results obtained the effect of weight 1 R-63 R-67 R-77 R-90 R-57
2 R-64 R-65 R-81 R-87 R-55
fraction (Vf ) on modulus of elasticity and ultimate strength
3 R-61 R-66 R-79 R-89 R-58
are shown in Equations 3 and 4 with a correlation coeffi- 4 R-60 R-68 R-80 R-91 R-57
cient >0.9. 5 R-63 R-64 R-78 R-92 R-55
Mean R-62.2 R-66 R-79 R-89.8 R-56.4
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)=61.84Vf +907.3 (3) SD 1.6431 1.5811 1.5811 1.9235 1.3416
90
310 50
Modulus of elasticity, Ultimate strength
85
280
Reduction in length (%)
80
45
Hardness (MRH)
250 75
220 40 70
Modulus of elasticity/10 MPa
65
190 Ultimate strength, MPa
% Reduction in length 35 60
160
55
130 30 50
10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25
Walnut particles (wt%) Walnut particles (wt%)
Figure 5Ultimate strength for different weight percentage of Figure 6Hardness (MRH) for different weight percentage of walnut
walnut reinforced composite. reinforced composite.
280
240
Ultimate strength (tension)
220
Ultimate strength (MPa)
200
180
160
140
120
100
60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Hardness (MRH)
The present result shows that a linear relation between flexural modulus of elasticity. But flexural stress and flex-
hardness and ultimate strength in tension and compres- ural strain was found to be higher for 10 wt% walnut filled
sion exists. The following correlation between hardness composites as compared with others investigated in this
and ultimate strength has been developed (Equations 5 report.
and 6) with a correlation coefficient >0.9, where H is hard-
ness in MRH scale.
Ultimate compressive strength (MPa) = -4.280H + 522.3 (5) 4 Conclusions
Ultimate tensile strength (MPa)=-1.648H + 247.3. (6) Epoxy bio composites reinforced with walnut particles
were prepared. Such bio composites were experimentally
characterized by means of microscopy, tensile, compres-
sion, hardness and bending test. Remarkable changes
3.4.5 Flexural strength
in the mechanical properties have been noticed due to
addition of walnut particles in bio composite. Addition
The flexural strength of the walnut particle filled epoxy
of walnut particles increased the hardness, which is very
resin composite materials were determined by 100 kN
important property for particles board with sustainable
ADMET make servo controlled universal testing machine
tensile and compressive properties.
at 1mm/min strain rate under displacement control mode
using three point bend test. The results are presented in
Acknowledgments: The author expresses his gratitude
Table 6.
and sincere thanks to Department of Science and Technol-
As depicted by the test data, amongst the composite
ogy, India, for providing finance to carry out this research
materials developed the 25 wt%, walnut reinforced com-
work smoothly.
posite shows the best results with regard to the flexural
modulus of elasticity (1560 MPa) and also it is better than
10 wt% walnut reinforced composites with regard to the Received December 16, 2013; accepted January 2, 2014
References
[1] Tewri M, Singh VK, Gope PC, Chaudhary A. J. Mater. Environ. [12] Guru M, Tekeli S, Bilici I. Mater. Des. 2006, 7, 11481151.
Sci. 2012, 3, 171184. [13] Han G, Zhang C, Zhang D, Umemura K, Kawai S. J. Wood Sci.
[2] Bowen RL. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1963, 66, 5764. 1998, 44, 282286.
[3] Caughma WF, Rueggeberg FA, Curtis JWJR. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. [14] Rowel RM, Norimoto M. Mokuzai Gakkaishi. 1988, 34,
1995, 126, 12801286. 627629.
[4] Terry DA. Pract. Proced. Aesthet. Dent. 2004, 16, 417422. [15] Gurjar RM. Bioresource Technol. 1993, 43, 177178.
[5] Stark NM, Rowlands RE. Wood Fiber Sci. 2003, 35, 167174. [16] Papadopoulos AN, Hague JRB. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2003, 17,
[6] Yao F, Wu Q, Lei Y, Xu Y. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2008, 28, 6372. 143147.
[7] Ashori A, Nourbakhsh A. Compos. Mater. 2009, 43, 18691875. [17] Yang HS, Kim DJ, Kim HJ. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 86, 117121.
[8] Gorokhovsky AV, Escalante-Garcia JI, Gashnikova GY, [18] Ntalos GA, Grigoriou AH. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2002, 16, 5968.
NikulinaLP, Artemenko SE, Waste Management, vol. 25, [19] Viswanathan R, Gothandapani L. J. Agri. Eng. Res. 1999, 74,
Pergamon Press: UK, 2005, pp. 733736. 331337.
[9] Panthapulakkal S, Sain M. Compos. Part A-Appl S. 2007, 38, [20] Kamdem DP, Jiang H, Cui W, Freed J, Matuna LM. Composites
14451454. Part A, 2004, 35, 347355.
[10] Wang Z, Wang E, Zhang S, Ren Y. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2009, 29, [21] Singh VK, Gope PC. J. Solid Mech. 2009, 3, 233244.
133138. [22] Misra A, Singh VK. J. IEI. 2010, 91, 2124.
[11] Wang D, Sun XS. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2002, 15, 4750. [23] Singh VK, Gope PC. J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 2010, 29, 24502468.