Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lichfield

    Uploaded by

    AndyPalmer
    30 views21 pages
    Lichfield

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lichfield

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    30 views21 pages

    Lichfield

    Uploaded by

    AndyPalmer
    Lichfield

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 21
    [aFonm W32— February 2008 Calculation Sheet JM Project, Licvield Park, Lichfielt Tae — Trae Presto [ore Rona Page rTOave 06.0808 |porerzz.u | Bieenshaw ot tem aicuiation om Objective To assess the viability of soakaway drainage to serve roof drainage rom part of the site layout. ‘The development site incorporates a series of commercial ‘sheds’ of| differing sizes together with a small campus of office accommodation. | The site has potential for infitration drainage, limited to root-run-off only due to the proximity of a water supply abstraction nearby. Blocks K, L and M are being considered, together with the northem office building. [Site Site-specific testing was done in 2006 and the results are attached Pits nrs 2-4 are most relevant and closest to the point of interest: pit nr 1 is farther down the site and has not been considered, | The test results were: TP2 3.24x 10% misor ~0.116mvhr TPS 2.34 x 10° 0.084 TR 2.44 x 10% 0.088 Ave 2.67 x 10° 0.096 Block K: 2,910m* Block L: 2,700 Block M: 1,760 Office: 380 [Building Regulations H2 | 10-year standard of performance is required ths is backed by BRE 365 which also works with 10-year rainfall data, BRE 365 Soekanay _| The guidance from BRE 365 will be used to size the soakaways. {Design Design: 1-08, where; | = Inflow from drained area Outflow through infiltration S = Storage required to accommodate the excess I=AxR, where, ‘A= Drained area (m*) Net rainfall from a given event (m) vy Susuuerd 8 i 7 Trial Pit Field Soakaway Test Project: Lichfield Park - Phase 2 Project No: P4045 Date: 23rd June 2006 TestNo: TP2 Time | a Depth to Water | Depth of Results (2anrs) | (mins) (metres) | (metres) 1a oof 0.44 1.18 ee] 25) Trial Pit Dimensions (m) 11:13 Length 1.60 Wet 060 Depth before test 1.60 Effective Depth of Water (m) 75% 162 50% 0.325 25% 0.4875 Summary vp(7s - 25) in m® 312 ‘Ap50 in m?. 2.380 Tp(75- 25) in seconds: 4020 Soil Infiltration Rate (f) in mis: 3.24 x10" Depth of water (m) oo 500 4000 180.0 2000 2500 ‘comulative tine (mine) Trial Pit Field Soakaway Test Project: Lichfield Park - Phase 2 Project No: P4045 Date: 23rd June 2006 TestNo: TP3 Time | epeestme| Pai towater| OR? Resto caanesy [ni | aces) | gmeee 4.081 ‘Trial Pit Dimensions (m) Length: 1.50 Wiath: 0.60 Depth before test: 1.60 Effective Depth of Water (m) 78% 9.095 50% o19 25% 0.285 Summary ‘Vp(76 - 25} in m’ oa7t ‘p50 in mi? 4.698 Tp(75-25) in seconds: 4290 Soil Infiltration Rate (f) In mis : 2.34 x 10° 100 0.80 60 040 Depth of water 00 500 3000 180.0 2000 2500 cumulative time (min) Trial Pit Field Soakaway Test Project: Lichfield Park - Phase 2 Project No: P4045 Date: 23rd June 2006 TestNo: TP4 Cumulative Depth of Time | anced time} Depth to Water | “Vator Results (24 hrs) (mins) (metres) ‘Trial Pit Dimensions (m) Length: 1.40 Wiath: 0.60 Depth before test: 1.45 Effective Depth of Water (m) 75% 0.1325 50% 0.265 25% 0.3975 Summary Vp(75 - 25) in ni 0.223 ‘A950 in r? 1.900 ‘Tp(7S - 25) in seconds: 4600 Soil Infiltration Rate (f) In mis : 2.44 x 10° 80 070 060 ose oo 030 20 0.10 0.00 + ‘Depth of water (n) 209 00 200 +000 1200 cumulative te (mins) 1400 SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE H3 Materials for pipes and jointing 9.16 See paragraph 2.40 of Approved Document Ht. Bedding and backfilling 3.17 See paragraphs 2.41 to 2.45 of Approved Document H1. Clearance of blockages 3.18 See paragraphs 2.46 to 2.54 of Approved Document Hi Workmanship 8.19 See paragraphs 2.55 to 2.58 of Approved Document H1 Testing and inspection 8.20 See paragraphs 2.50 to 2.62 of Approved Document Ht Contaminated runoff 3.21 Where any materials which could cause pollution are stored or used, separate drainage systems should be provided. This should include an appropriate form of separator or treatment system or the flow should be discharged into a system suitable for receiving polluted effluent. 8.22 On car parks, petrol filling stations or other areas where there Is likely to be leakage or spillage of oil, drainage systems should be provided with oil interceptors (see Appendix H3-A\. filtration Soakaways and other drainage systems 8,23 Infiltration devices include sozkaways, ‘wales, infiltration basins, and filter drains. 3.24 Further information on the design of Infiltration drainage systems can be found in CIRIA Report 156 ~ Infiltration drainage ~ Manual of good practice. 3.26 Infiltration drainage is not always possible. Infiltration devices should not be built: a) _ within 5m of.a building or road or in areas of unstable land (see Planning Policy Guidance Note 14 Annex 1); b) _in ground where the water table reaches the bottom of the device at any time of the year; ©) _ sufficiently far from any drainage fields, drainage mounds or other soakaways so that the overall soakage capacity of the ground is not exceeded and the effectiveness of any drainage field is not impaired (see Approved Document H2); d)__ where the presence of any contamination in the runoff could result in pollution of groundwater source or resource. 8.26 Soakaways for areas less than 100m* soakaways are generally formed from square or circular pits, filled with rubble or lined with dry- jointed masonry or perforated ring units. Soakaways serving larger areas are generally 1ed pits or trench type soakaways. 8.27 Soakaways should be designed to a return period of once in ten years. The design should be carried out with storms of differing durations to determine the duration which gives. the largest storage volume. For small soakaways serving 25m or less a design rainfall of 10mm in 6 minutes may be assumed to give the worst case. For soakaways serving larger areas reference should be made to the sources listed in paragraph 3.30. Where the ground is marginal overflow drains can be acceptable. 3.28 Percolation tests should be carried out to determine the capacity of the soil (see Approved Document H2 paragraphs 1.34 to 1.98). Where the test is carried out in accordance with Approved Document H2, the soil infiltration rate {f) is related to the value Ve derived from the test by the equatio f= to* 2Vs 3.29 The storage volume should be calculated 80 that, over the duration the storm, the storage volume is sufficient to contain the difference between the inflow volume and the outflow volume. The inflow volume is calculated from the rainfall depth (see paragraph 3.26) and the area drained. The ‘outflow volume (0) is calculated from the equation: O=amx fxD Where au: is the area of the side of the storage volume when filled to 50% of its effective depth, and D Is the duration of the storm in minutes, 3.90 Soakaways serving larger areas should be designed in accordance with BS EN 752-4 (see 8.36), or BRE Digest 365 Soakaway desigr Other types of infiltration system 8.31 Swales are grass-lined channels which transport rainwater from a site as well as controlling flow and quality of surface runoff. Some of the flow infiltrates into the ground. ‘There may be an overflow at the end into another form of infiltration device or a watercourse, They are particular suitable for treatment of runoff from small residential developments, parking areas and roads. Approved Document H Drainage and waste disposat 48 Soakaway design Digest 365 RE CeneconDivkion ee Bilan beng ‘Soakaways have been the traditional way to dispose of stormwater from ees buildings and paved areas remote fom apublicsewer or watercourse. n recent years, soakaways have been used within urban, uly-sevvered areas tolimit the impact on discherge of new upstream building works and to _avold costs of sewer upgrading outside development. Soakaways are seen increasingly asa more widely applicable option alongside other ‘means of stormwater contol and disposal. — capt ‘Soakawaysmuststore the immediate stormwater run-off andallow forts 3 ffdeninfvatininto the adacentsol. they mstdscargetherstoed Sama water suficenty quickly toprovidethenecessarycapactytorecele 3 runoff fama subsequent storm. The time taken for discharge depends tupon the soakaway shape and size, and the surrounding soi'infitration characteristics. They can be constructed in many different forms and from arange of materials, This Digest descrines design and construction procedures for soakaways, ‘explains how to cakulat rainfall design values andsolinfitration rates, ‘and ives design examples. Digest 365s being ressued withninar ygogephicalamiendmens to cold withthe ablation of BRESOAK Soakawy desig software Re. P24) ResoNesotorrs ps deg in skye wegen oe coer es ee Salieri tea ‘Shape and size ‘Soakaways for areas less than 100m? have traditionally been builtas square or circular pts, either filled with rubble or lined with dry-jointed brickwork or precast perforated concrete ring units surrounded by suitable granular backiill. ‘BS 8301 suggests that soskaways may take the form of trenches that follow convenient contours: compared with square or cireular shapes, they bave larger internal surface areas for infiltration of stormwater fora given stored volume, The designer must consider the merits of the more compact square or circular forms against the belter rate of discharge from the ‘trench inthe particular conditions of soil type, available space, site layout and topography. For drained areas above 100m", soakaways ‘can be precast ring or of tench type and not substantially deeper than soakaways that serve small areas: 3 o4mis adequate if ground conditions allow. Although limiting the depth does mean the length must be increased, trench soakaways are cheaper to dig with readily available excavating equipment. Soil infiltration characteristics ‘Themethod of determination must give representative results forthe proposed site ofthe soakaway. This is achieved by: © Excavating a trial pit of sufficient size to representa section of the design scakaway. ‘© Filling the pit several times in quick succession whilst monitoring the rate of seepage, to represent soil moisture conditions typical ofthe site when the soakaway becomes operative, (© Examining site data to ensure that variations in soil conditions, areas of filled land, referential underground seepage routes, variations in the level of groundwater, and any geotechnical and geological factors likely to affect the long-term percolation and stability of the area surrounding the soakaway have been assessed. Groundwater should not rise to the level ofthe base of the soakaway during annual variations in the water table, Local building control and/or planning authorities should advise where fluctuations in groundwater level may cause a problem in the long term for any proposed depth of exea Design procedure ‘The design method for sizing a soakaway is based upon the equation of volumes: 1-0-8 where: = the inflow from the impermeable area drained to the soakeway 0» the outflow infiltrating into the soil during rainfall ‘S= the required storage in the soakavray to balance ‘temporarily inflow and outflow. Inflow to the soakaway L-A4xR where: = the impermeable area drainedto the soakaway Re thetotal ainfall ina design storm (a 10-year return period should be used); calculation of Ris, shown in the box below. Outflow from the seakaway 0 aqxf XD where: ‘gy the internal surface area of the soakaway to 50% effective depth: this excludes the base area whicis assumed to clog with fine particles and become ineffective inthe long term fa the soil infiltration rate determined in a trial pit at the site ofthe soakaway ‘D= the storm duration, Calculating design rainfall ‘Values of design rain, R, cathe determined using Figure | and “Tables {and 2 for differencstorm durations witha 10-yearreturn period. The notation MED minis used to iden the storm, where’ : X= theresurnporiod ia years D. ~ thestorn duration insninites, “The 10-year retum period rainfall of 15 minutes duration, known. ‘as M1015 min, oF of30 minutos duration, known as M10-30 min ‘ainfal,iscalculated as follows: ‘From the map in Figure 1, determine the rainfall ratio, r, for the location ofthe soalaway (interpolating between contours). Use this in Table Io give the factor fx the eateuation ofthe $S-yearrenim pened raintallttal, M5-D min, for different storm ‘durations D. : : ‘The bass of thecalculation ste MS-60 mia rainfall: his can be {taken tobe 20 rm forall parts of the United Kingdom. (M5-Dminsainfall. ~MS-60 minrainfll 23((orEngland and 920.1 em ‘Other duration are calculate inthe same way, This procedure to determine the 10-year rainfalls must be sed ‘because he base deaare availabe onl for Sear returns Relafall duration D trates vous vnaua wget zs ; rato En Fi SiS Path Enid Sete 012] 022 034 045 067 100 148 217 275 370 600 0.15] 0.25 0.38 0.48 0.69 1.00 142 202 2.46 3.23 4.90 7 19 ay 0.18] 0.27 O41 O51 O71 1.00 136 186 2.25 2.86 430 i 122 119 0.21) 0.29 0.43 0.54 073 100 133 L77 212 262 3.60 a oad Ld 0.26] 0.31 0.46 0.56 0.75 1.00 130 L71 2.00 240 3.35 2 126 119 21] 033 0a8 038 075 1o0 127 Lat las 2% 310 kB 0.30] 0.34 0.49 0.59 0.77 100 1.25 157 178 212 2.84 i eed ad 033| 035 050 O61 O78 100 123 133 17 200 2m MSL 03s] 035 031 O82 079 10) 122 La 157 18 242 0.39] 0.37, 0.52 0.63 0.80 100 1.21 146 1.62 182 228 ci 1a lie 0.42 | 0.38 0.53 0.64 O81 1.00 1.20 142 187 174 216 100 ee! 04s] 039 05t 055 O87 100 119 138 131 153205 © the outflow from the soakaway is under-estimated; higher infiltration rates occur at greater depths of storage in practice than are adopted in design, and because the outflow is ealeulated on the basis of the rainfall duration rather than the run-off duration, The latter may be ‘considerably longer, depending on the length of drains, Soil infiltration rate Excavate a soakage trial pit to the same depth as anticipated in the full-size soakaway, fornun-off from 100 m? this will be 1 to 1.5 mbelow the invert level ofthe drain discharging tothe soakeway. Overall depths of excavation will be typically 1.5 to 2.5 m for permeable areas up to 100m? draining to the soakaway. ‘The trial pit should be 0.3 to lm wide and I to 3 mong, It should have vertical sides trimmed square and, iftecessary for stability, should be filled with granular ‘material. When granular fill is used, a full-height, perforated, vertical observation tube should be positioned in the pit so that water levels can be monitored with a dip tape. It should be possible to construct suitably dimensioned pit with a backhoe loader or mini-exeavator. Narrow, short pits use less water forthe soakage tests but may be more difficult to trim and clean prior to testing. Measure the pit carefully before trials. For safety reasons do not enter the pit. A lot of water will be used to determine the sil {infiltration rate so water bowser may be needed. The inflow should be rapid so that the pit can be filled to its ‘maximum effective depth in a short time, ie to the design invert level ofthe drain tothe soakaway. Take care that the inflow does not cause the walls of the pit to collapse. Fill the pit and allow itto drain three times to near empty; ‘each time record the water level and time ftom filling, at intervals sufficiently close to clearly define water level versus time (Figure 2). The three fillings should be on the same or consecutive days, CCateutste the soil infiltration rate from the time taken for the water level to fall froma 75% to 25% effective storage depth in the pit, using the lowest f value of the three test, results for design: where: Ys Soil nftraton ate, f = 2-8 a Apso X Fyns— 25 ¥, ‘og-a5 = the effective storage volume of water in the trial pit between 75% and 25% effective depth the internal surface area of the tial pit up to 50% effective depth and including the base the time for the water level to fall from 75% 10 25% effective depth. Ifthe test pit is deeper than about 3 m, it may be difficult to supply sufficient water fora fall-depth soakage test. Tests ‘may be conducted at less than full depth but determinations of the soil infiltration rate may be lower than those from the {ull-depth test. This is because relationships between depth of water in the soakage pit, the effective area of outflow and ‘the infiltration rate can vary with depth, even when soil, conditions themselves do not vary. The variation in infiltration rate with the depth at which the determination is made may beas much as a factor of two, From the resultsof a soakage trial in Figure 2, the calculated infiltration rate based upon a fal of water level from: © 75% to 50% effective depth is 5.1 x 10% m/s © 50% to 25% effective depths 2.9 x 10° m/s ‘The design method adopts the result determined from 75% 10.25% effective depth of 3.3 x 10 m/s (see the box on page 5), Ifitis impossible to carry outa full-depth soakage test, soil infiltration rate calculation should be based on the time namionaL, ORS Figure 1 Ratio of 60-minute to 2-day rantals ofS year return period -from Design and analysis of urban storm damage (Department ofthe Eavionment) for fall of water level fiom 75% to 25% of the actual _maximam water depth achieved in the test. The effective area of loss from the coskage pit is then calculated as the internal surface area ofthe pitto 50% maximum depth achieved plus the base area of the pit. In general, soakage trials should be undertaken where the drain will discharge to the soakaway. The use of full-depth and of repeat determinations at locations along the fine of trench, soakavays is very important when soil conditions vary; if the soil is fissured, infiltration rates can vary enormously. In these situations, a preliminary design length for the proposed soakaway should be calculated from the first Soakage trial pitresult and, ifthe design length exceeds 10 m,a second trial shouldbe carried out atthe design Calculating sol infitration rate Figuro2 shows typical fied obsecvations from a scakage tral pit Iewas known thatthe invert ofthe discharge drain wasto be | mbelow ground surface. An effectivestorage depth 13a ‘was adopted. When trimmed and clean, the tial pit was 2.51 m deep, 240 mong and 0,60 m wide ‘Volunteoutflowing between 15% and 25% effective depth: Foysas=240%0.60%(.13-1.38)= 100m! ‘The mean surlacearea trough which te outflow oceurs, taken tobe the pit sides o 50% effective depth and including the base ofthepit: Aga = (240 X 0.155 x2) + (0.6 0.755 x2)+ (2.40 0.60) 397m From Figure 2, the time forthe outlaw between 75% and 25% effective dept joss" 102-11 91 min 109 Soilinfiration ate, |= = 5979160 33x10 méee length distance along the line ofthe soakaway. Inall ground conditions, a second trial pit should be dug ifthe trench, soakaway (designed on the basis of one trial pit)is longer ‘than 25 m; further trial pits are needed at intervals of 25 m ‘along the line of long soakaway. IFmore than one trial pit is used, the mean value of the soil percolation rates determined from the trial pits is edopted forthe final design. ime of emptying of soakaway — ‘The soakaway should discharge from full tohali-volume within 24 hours in readiness for subsequent storm inflow. Construction details ‘Maintenance of soakaways has always presented problems, usually in finding them! This is certainly the case with rubble-filled ones. All soakaways should be provided with some form of inspection access, sothat the point of| discharge ofthe drain to the soakaway can be seen. This ‘access will identify the location and will allow material to bbe cleared from the soakaway. Little monitoring of soakaway performance is done, but this could be most informative about changes in soil infiltration rate and in warning of soakaway blockage in the long term, The inspection access should provide aclear view to the base ofthe soakaway, even when the soakaway is ofthe filled ype (Figure 3). For small, filled soakaways, a 225 mm perforated pipe provides suitable inspection well Lined soakaways have the advantage of access for inspection and cleaning and this should be feature ofall soskaways, Trench-type soakaways should baveat least ‘wo inspection access points, one at each end ofa straight ‘reach, with a horizontal perforated or porous distributor pipe linking the ends along the top of the granular fill (Figure 4). Irmay be convenient with a trench soakaway to = Maximum effective dopih ~ + > ‘78% ful - 20) 25] Depth below ground surlace, 160200 Time trom fling to maximum effective pt, min Figure 2 Fee observations from a soakage tia pit2.51 m deep; 2.4m ong; 0.6 mwide ao granutar 8 Access gover Inspection Q wel & A? Geotextle around BES / scesandtonof ce grander Figure 3 Smal filed soakaway wih perforeted inspection wel extending ‘to base of sockaway providing access to discharge draioulet Porous stributor pine Figure 4 Tench type soakaway with horizontal distributor pipe have several drain discharge points along the length of the trench, each connected to the soakaway via an inspection ‘access chamber, Intrench soakaways, the movement of suspended and. floating material into the distributor pipe can be minimised byusing wet wells with a piece inlet fitted to the distributor pipe (Figure 6). Two or more T-piece inlets to distributor pipes in two or more trench soakaways may be appropriate for large wet well designs. The advantages of sedimentation of fine material in the precast chamber, for cease of maintenance and extended operating life, are combined with the more efficient trench discharge characteristics. For WS — February 2008 Calculation Sheet JMP Project” Lichfield Park, Lichfield Made by Bate (rajeei No (checked By Approves Page No: T Dawe 09.0808 [Pove022 | P Birkenshaw 02 item [Calculation Output 0 = ago x Fx D, wheres ‘aso = Internal surface area of soakaway up to 50% effective depth, [excluding base area (m’). = Infiltration rate (rm/hr) = Storm duration (hr) | Storm durations to be tested for D = 0.083 - 24hrs. Rainfall data from BRE 965 Tables 1 & 2 [See attached spreadsheet for results For Table 1, the value of 'r applicable to the site is ~0.39 (see extract {from HR Wallingford map) cl if} factor of safety (FoS) is applied to the infiltration coefficient: this is GIRIA, RIS Design Of en fom Table 48 of CIRIA R168, The consequnces of hus Se taken, in this instance, as ‘NO inconvenience’ since flooding from the Soakeway will only frst affect the landscape area behind the buildings The FoS is 1.5 “Tiafitvation ‘trench’ 80m long by 2.5m wide by 1.6m deep. Effective| [depth ‘0m with 0.6m grenular fil on top. Main storage to be provided by proprietary ‘beer-crate’ storage calls Effective area = 2 x (80+ 2.6) x 1.0 = 165m" aso = 82.5m “The storage provided, for a typical ‘porosity’ co-efficient of 0.90 for the storage cells and 0.3 for the granular fil above, is: (002.5 x 1.00.9) + (80x25 x06 x03) = 216m" \infitration trench’ 70m long by 2.5m wide by 1.6m deep. Effective | depth 1.0m with 0.6m granular fil on top. Main storage to be provided by proprietary ‘beer-crate’ storage cals. Effective area = 2 x (70 + 2.6) x 1.0 260 = 72.50 -The storage provided, for atypical ‘porosity’ co-efficient of 0.90 for the storage cells and 0.3 for the granular fill above, is: (70x25 x 1.0 x 0.9) + (70x 2.60.6 x 0.3) = 188m" 145m’. Lchfls Par, Lchils By: T Dawe, cheated RD, M560" 20mm From BRE S88 Caiong ceo aa secon) Duaten 21 MD zk tow Cis) Tablet) (om) Table} tom ong oes, TAN, te aw = Ostet or estes Has os katate + to tea 2 in me te 8 6 te me ie BS 0 i esp P » i see Block K 2910 m* ‘Block m AS 1760 m? ee ne t= does mie 82.5 m a= s75m 18 fo= ts Duration 0m) 4 os Duraton mO-D—) 1 o 4 (hrs) (mm) my ry (mn?) (hrs) (ram) Am?) im’) n'y Ce cos og se bor has otra? aor ar ayes ak 2 asta oa 55st 0s 8 ary aat Bs oes Set 1 os at ago tome sae 2 oo seas 2 no eee 6 Ss eo arm ars é 35 eee an wo 87 art aaa m 8? ee a % 838 tee trogen M8 rasta leaxR O=Dit Block L_ 2700 m? Office block 300 m? ee me ee ie sy = 725m 22.5 me res tg 48 Duraton 0-D(R) 1 os uration : cuits hrs) {rm} tm?) tm) tm) (hrs tm’) (im) (me) eS 080 aa ba a oir er ss 8 oer aso 02 is3 ta tue 08 as cam ay ose eau a3 ot 1 sorts t othe 2 oo ate eg 2 m8 6 3s am? onas es é aa te mw 87 re fos 2° v0 ete ue owes trae ” Ho me 43 ‘Soekanay calculations Sepsis toy 1090972008, GIRIA Report 158 EXAMPLE Detenmine the 10-year serum period rainfall satscs for a site near Southampton ‘Sep. From the map in Figure 43 the value of the rainfall ratio for the locaton near Southampton is 7 = 0.35, ‘The above method produces rainfall inenses of diferent durations with a 10-year tru pesiod 1 rsiofall intensities of + aiflecne ret period are required growth cymes deteribed in the Flood Suudes Repott should be used. These relate the value for a O.year seurn period to those for diferent return periods 1 should be noted that in the above the minfll intensity is expressed in mh. Rainfall intensities are sso commonly expressed in mmf, the rao between the two values being 1000. In the subsequent hyeraulic ealuletins, mh has been selected as the units used should be consistent with each other ‘Thus if the siz of the basis ia expresed in mewes and the inflcation coefficient ia eh then the rainfall intensity sed in the caleaatons showld be expresied in ah Table 4.6 Factor of safety, F, for use in hydraulic design Sep 2 Using y = 035 determine the 10-year canal intensity fr each storm duration from Table 45. Storm duration, © alfa intensiy, (in) i (om) 0 oon 5 0.081 30 nse o 92s 0 oors 240 0.008 360 oon «oo 0.008 Size of area to be drained Consequences of falure No damage or Minor Damage to buildings 0 Inconvenlence inconvenience, eg, structures oF major surface water on car inconvenience, ey ° parking flooding of roads < 100 mt Ls 2 10 100 m0 1000 ma? is 3 0 > 1000 mi! ts 5 0 53 raFonm WE — Fobruaty 2008 Calculation Sheet ee Project: Lichfield Park, Lichfotd |Drain-down times depth 1.0m with 0.6m granular fil on top. Main storage to be provided by proprietary ‘beer-crate’ storage cells. Effective area = 2 x (20+ 2.5) x 1.0 = 45m? 59 = 22.60", “The storage provided, for atypical ‘porosity’ co-efficient of 0.90 for the storage cells and 0.3 for the granular fil above, is: (20x 2.5 x 1.0 x09) + (202.5 x0.6x0.3) = S4m* ‘AN four soakaways perform edequataly: the maximum storage (S)| requirements are more than catered for by the available capacities of leach soakaway. Unit Capacity Max S value (10-year storm) K 216m* 7m? L 189 82 u 149 50 Office 84 9 BRE 366 stipulates that “The soakaway should discharge from full to half-volume within 24 hours in readiness for subsequent storm inflow.” None of the soakaways actually fil to above half-volume against the ful capacity though see also beiow for extreme event capacity). The drain. (Gown time for each soakaway post-event for the stored water tabulated| above is estimated as follows: Effective area at end of storm infiltrating water is di: this depth wil ‘gradually falas the soskaway empties. Assume ave flow area of h/4 remainder of drain-dovn (2) 0.20 90 476 L 0.52 754 518 haltempty in Mt 0.40 460 518 about 1 day: OK. off aie by oa Pigjed Ne [Shockey [aporouedby Page Ne rT Dave 10-0008 [Po7e0z2-U___[P Birkenshew tear [Calculation Output Block M infitration ‘trench’ 55m tong by 2.6m wide by 1.6m deep. Effective [depth 1.0m with 0.6m granular fil on top. Main storage to be provided by proprietary ‘beer-crate' storage cells. Effective area = 2 x (85 + 2.5) x 1.0 = 116m" 250 = 875m -the storage provided, fora typical ‘porosity co-efficient of 0.90 for the! storage cells and 0.3 for the granular fil above, is: (65 x 2.5 x 1.0 x 0.9) + (65x 2.6 x 0.60.3) = 149m° Gifce Bicck (nitration ‘trench’ 20m long by 2.6m wide by 4 ‘6m deep, Effective| Unit ds a tea= Sx 4/ (arxf) The soakaways K 4am = 78.2m? 52.3hrs will empty wholly in ~2 days; will -aFomn WS = February 2008 Calculation S| heet IMP Project Lichfield Park, Lenton ade rede Checked by Appioned Br Page Ro: TOawe 10.0808 [Po76o220 | Bitkenshaw 04 item [Gaicutation [Output Extreme event capacity |The storage of each soakavay also requires to hold the 100-year + 30%| rainfall event, to avoid surface flooding. M100-D can be derived from MS-D by using the relevant set of 22 factors (taken from Table 6.2 of| ‘The Wallingford Procedure Design and analysis of urban storm| drainage. The corresponding peak storage volumes in the extreme event are as follows: Unit Capacity Mex $ value K 216 218 L 189 204 iM 149 127 lofice 84 25 ‘The soakaways for'M' and the office have sufficient capacity. Unit‘K'is| right t its limit; 'L’ requires a small increase in storage. chet Par, Lita Msso= Duration Aes) 0.083 0.167 025 05: 10 24 Block « Duration (ts). 0.083 0.167 025 05 10 2% Block L Duration (hs) 0.089 0187 025 05: 10 Ps 20mm z rable 1, 4“ a. ° 1 1 1 4 2 beasesees AS t= a FoS= mi00-D + 20% (rm) 178 260 ste “8 528 2 e241 609 1007 Ae 1 ary Fos mio0.0 + 30% (mm) 178 260 319 a8 20 632 B21 209 1097 MED 22 (Table (om 62) 74 1138 104 92 16 495 160 2.00 200 203 242 201 S24 4195: 384 12 456 138; 2910 me 0.084 mtr zg m* 18 1 ° to tm 518 ‘038 755 or 29 116 wat 231 1636 482 1840 9.24 zoo are pete 46.20 3101 110.88 TeARR O= Dros, 2700 mP 0.084 mvnr 725m 18 ' ° (oa 481 0.98 701 0.8 962 102 1123 203 1425 405 707 ez 2181430 2483 40.80 2981 oTAe Soakaway calculations Sept08.x6 M1000 m00-0 + (ave. "37 200 28 52.0 408 400 a2 628 Bas (ox, 417 oa 252 1103 i384 1626 1974 2047 = 1887 30% ire 280 319 418 528 832 224 909 1097 (From BRE 985 Calculating design ranfat section) “from The Walingford Procedure Block Duration (ts) 0.088 0.167 0.25 05: 4 2 é 10 2 Office block Duration (bre) 0.083 0.107 0.25 05: 10 2 100-7 ctmate ao Fos = tm00.0 + 20% (mmm) 178 260 518 418 528 32 aa 08 1087 As 1 Fos = mt00.0 +, 20% (mm) 178 260 318 416 20 ea2 21 09 1087 1760 m* 0.084 mite ‘orm 15 1 ° tm), mn’) a9 "oar 47 (4 32 (at m2 161 e322 113 baa sais 1932 199 3220 19907728 300 a (0.084 rhe ° tn 010 104 oat 28082 182088 26 128 mr 282 mo 756 384 1260 428 3024 ey: Dawe, Checkea: AIG 99 24 165 193 24 245« na as oroer2008 rable 6.2 Relationship between rainfall of return period T (MT) and M5 England and Wales (Ratio 22) Ms Roinfoll = M2) M3. MMS. Mizo. 50. MTO0 062 079 089 097 1.02 119 196 186 1.79 061 079 090 097 103 122 141 165 1.91 ams 062 080 090 097 103 1.24 144 «1.70 1.99 nent. | 064 (0.81 (090 097 103 124 145 173 203 rate 065 082 (091 097 103 1.24 144 172 «2.01 weal 068 (083 091 097 103 122 142 1.70 1.97 070 084° 092 097 102 119 138 164 «(1.89 072 085 093 098 102 1.17 134 188 1.81 alled 076 087 093 098 102 114 1.28 147 1.64 ition 078 088 094 098 1.02 113 125 140 1.54 hing 078 (0.88 (0.94 «(098 (101 «1120 1.210 1931.45 ilter, 078 088 094 098 101 111 1.19 130 © 1.40 69 Table 6.3 Relationship between rainfall of return period T (MT) and MS - Scotland and Northern Ireland (Ratio 22) _ 6.10 Ms Rainfall M1 M2 M3 M4 MB MIO Wz0 «M50 M100 mm 5 067 082 081 098 102 1.17 135 1621.88 10 068 082 091 098 103 119 139 169 1.97 6 069 083 091 097 103 1.20 139 1.70 1.98 end. 20 0.70 084 092 097 102 1.19 138 1.66 1.93 nfall 25 O71 084 092 098 102 1.18 (137 1.64 1.88 outer 30 072 085 0982 098 102 118 136 1.61 1.85 zarly 40 0.74 086 093 098 102 417 134 186° 177 50 0.75 087 093 098 102 116 130 162 1.72 75 077° 088 (094 098 102 116 127 145 1.62 100 078 088 094 O98 102 113 124 140 184 => 160 079° «089 «(094 098 102 111 120 133 145 200 080 089 095 099 101 110 118 130 1.40 ‘ ‘ q Table 6.4 Areal reduction constants for use in equation 6.6 a Size of area, AT f fe i (Km?) } AT<20 0.0384 AT®25 0,40-0.0208 In (4.6 ~ In AT) i 20

    You might also like