Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Robert M. Freund
April, 2004
1
2
Let S IRn . The convex hull of S, denoted H(S), is the collection of all
convex combinations of points of S, i.e., x H(S) if x can be represented
as
k
x= j xj
j=1
where
k
j = 1, j 0, j = 1, . . . , k,
j=1
n+1
x= j xj
j=1
where
n+1
j = 1, j 0, j = 1, . . . , n, for some xj S, j = 1, . . . , n + 1 .
j=1
k
j xj = x
j=1
and
k
j = 1, 1 , . . . , k 0 .
j=1
solution, and we can presume, without loss of generality, that the basis
consists of columns 1, . . . , n + 1 of A. Thus, there exists 0, et = 1,
n+2 , . . . , k = 0 such that
n+1
n+1
j xj = x, j = 1, 0 .
j=1 j+1
Proof: Since x2 intS, there exists > 0 such that z x2 < implies
z S. Also, since x1 clS, for any > 0, there exists a z with z x1 <
and z S. Now let y = x1 + (1 )x2 be given, with (0, 1). Let
r = (1 ). I claim that for any z with z y < r, then z S. This
means that y intS, proving the theorem.
To prove the claim, consider such a z with z y < r. Let =
(1 ) z y. Then > 0. Then there exists z 1 with z 1 x1 <
and z 1 S. Let z 2 = (z z 1 )/(1 ).
5
1 1 )(yx1 )
z 2 x2 = (zz ) 2
(1) x =
(zz
1
1 1 1
= 1 z y (z x )
1
1 (z y + z 1 x1 )
1
< 1 (z y + ((1 ) z y))
= z y + < (1 ) + = .
x1
z1
z
y
r
z2
x2
K
L
xj j + dj j = x
j=1 j=1
K
j = 1
j=1
1 0, . . . , K 0, 1 0, . . . , L 0 .
8
f () is strictly convex if the inequality above is strict for all (0, 1) and
x= y.
f () is concave if f () is convex.
f () is strictly concave if f () is strictly convex.
Examples:
1. f (x) = ax + b
2. f (x) = |x|
3. f (x) = x2 2x + 3
4. f (x) = x for x 0
We also have:
M 1
0= M
y + y,
1+ M 1 + M
and so
M 1 f (y)
0 = f (0) M
f y + f (y) M
M + .
1+ M 1+ M 1+ M 1 + M
x + d) f (
f ( x)
f (
x, d) = lim ,
0+
when this limit exists.
x + 1 d) f (
f ( x) x + 2 d) f (
f ( x)
.
1 2
f (
x+d)f (
x)
Thus the term is nondecreasing in , and so the limit exists,
and is
x + d) f (
f ( x)
f (
x, d) = inf ,
>0
x, d) = .
so long as we allow f (
11
f (x) = x2 6x 9 = 9 + 6(x 3) = f (
x) + 6(x x)
,
12
If x
> 0, then = 1 is a subgradient of f () at x
If x
< 0, then = 1 is a subgradient of f () at x
If x
= 0, then [1, 1] is a subgradient of f () at x.
Let be any scalar larger that f (x). Then as we make arbitrarily large,
the inequality must still hold. Thus u 0. If u < 0, we can re-scale so that
u = 1. Then t x t x
f (
x), which upon rearranging yields:
x) + t (x x),
In particular, with y = f (x), f (x) f ( proving the theorem.
It remains to show that u = 0 is an impossibility. If u = 0, then t x t x
for all x S. But since x int S, x+
S for > 0 and suciently
x + ) t x,
small. Thus t ( and so t 0. But this is a contradiction
s.t. xS .
f ( x) t d + u
x + d) < + f (
x
+ d S, 0 t d + u
14
x) + t (x x),
f (x) f (
and so is a subgradient of f () at x
.
x + d) f (
f ( x + d x)
x) + t ( x) + t d .
= f (
15
Also
f ( x)t d + d(
x) + f (
x + d) = f ( x; d) .
Subtracting, we have
0 ( f (
x))t d d(
x; d)
x))t d d(
0 ( f ( x; d) .
1. Let K denote the dual cone of the closed convex cone K IRn ,
dened by:
9. In class, we stated the meta result that the study of convex functions
reduces to the study of convex functions on the real line. This exercise
formalizes this observation and shows how we might use it to obtain
results about convex function from results about convex functions on
the real line.
f (y) := sup{y t x | x S} .
x
x) + t (x x)}
H := {(x, ) | = f (
s.t. xX .