1

In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia

333 Constitution Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20001

Case No. _______________

Brad Kempo

Plaintiff

v.


Government of the United States of America

Defendant

COMPLAINT

PARTIES

1.01 Plaintiff BRAD KEMPO, has an address of 914 - 950 Drake Avenue,

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6Z 2B9.

1.02 The Government of the United States of America (hereinafter the

DEFENDANT), has an address c/o U.S. Department of Justice, 950

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20530-0001.

 2

COMPLAINT

2.01 In June 1985 KEMPO received a Bachelor of Arts Degree in political

science and philosophy from the University of Victoria in Victoria, British

Columbia, Canada. In June 1987 he returned to his home in Edmonton,

Alberta, Canada after receiving a Bachelor of Laws Degree from University

College Cardiff in Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom. Prior to qualifying to

become an attorney he pursued an entrepreneurial opportunity in the

computer animation industry. In 1988 he incorporated an Alberta company,

Intelligent Images Research Inc., and was President, Chief Executive Officer

and a major shareholder. There was a very high probability of enormous

financial success in this venture because (1) the industry was in its infancy

and (2) he had recruited three world class supercomputer experts, including

the architect of the paradigm-shifting, Pentagon prototype purchased Myrias

supercomputer, Colin Broughton, another similarly brilliant computer

scientist employed at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, and a

British national of the same caliber to write code (software) so the company

could produce computer generated imagery product for television

productions and advertisements, movies, music videos, computer aided

design for science, medicine, chemistry, manufacturing, engineering,

architecture, mechanics, forensic and collision reconstruction, education

tools and artwork etc.. KEMPOs predictions of extraordinary financial

success proved accurate. In or around August 2002 a leading industry

 3

publication reported an estimated worldwide revenue generation of $440

billion in hardware and software sales and production.

2.02 In 1988 the governments of Canada and China and their colluding

private sector partners began clandestinely conducting a human

experimentation on KEMPO (hereinafter R&D and R&D program); the

purpose of which was the militarization of hypnosis. Doing so was in direct

violation of the successor to the Nuremberg Code, Article 7 of the

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights a United Nations

human rights code that requires subjects be made knowledgeable of the

research and development program and express consent to be involved be

obtained. The Government of Canada ratified the Covenant and which

thereby became law on June 24, 1987. Said Covenant was ratified by

Congress on October 21, 1994, thus making it a constituent of U.S. law.

2.03 What was being pursed had direct historical parallels with what the

Central Intelligence Agency (hereinafter the CIA) did beginning in the late

1940s and for decades. As was widely reported, the Agency began

exploring the use of hypnosis and drugs and the research intensified in

response to fears that the emerging Communist powers were using

brainwashing techniques. The Agencys R&D included, as also reported,

sensory deprivation, sleep induction, LSD treatment [and] intensive

electroshocks to wipe the memory clean and reprogram the mind. This
 4

experimentation was conducted in Canada in collaboration with the

Government of Canada.

2.04 In order to perpetuate the R&D program, Intelligent Images Research

Inc.s venture was clandestinely sabotaged by the Government of Canada

and the Government of China. Unaware of this civil unlawfulness, KEMPO

abandoned the venture and in April 1989 began the process of fulfilling the

requirements to become an attorney. The two primary requirements were

to complete a one year apprenticeship with a member of the Bar known in

Canada as articles - and pass the Bar Admission Course, which involved a

series of assignments and examinations. Because he had a Commonwealth

law degree he additionally had to successfully pass accreditation tests to

make his said degree equivalent to one obtained in Alberta. He commenced

said articles on April 1, 1989 and completed them on March 31, 1990.

2.05 On or about April 13, 1990 the Government of Canadas CIA-style

agency The Canadian Security & Intelligence Service (hereinafter CSIS)

contacted KEMPO and deceitfully represented that industrial espionage

agents working for the Government of Russia resided across the street from

his residence at 10813 108 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. The

purpose of these blatantly intentional misrepresentations was to manipulate

him into consenting to the installation of surveillance equipment in said

home. The real intention for said installation was to envelop him with more
 5

electronics to advance the R&D program. Consideration was in the form of

paying his monthly rent.

2.06 On September 21, 1990 KEMPO was formally admitted to the practice

of law in Alberta. His sole proprietorship law practice, which he operated

from his said residence, commenced with CSIS continuing to operate the

civilly unlawful and human rights violating surveillance operation; and doing

so until February 1992. Concomitant with it were a series of interlinking

initiatives, the overall objective of which was to remove him from active

practice so as to procure perpetual impecuniosity and a societal quarantine

as having a career, family, professional and social circles and geographical

mobility were R&D-detrimental distractions. The Canada-China alliance

successfully peripheralized him from civil society so as to have exclusive and

indefinite access to his person and cognitions to advance the R&D program.

2.07 In January 1993 the covert sabotage of KEMPOs law practice was

successful. He abandoned his practice, home and province of residence and

moved to Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (hereinafter Vancouver).

The governments of Canada and China and their private sector colluding

parties (hereinafter the Canada-China alliance) perpetuated the R&D

throughout the 1990s and 2000s.

 6

2.08 To mitigate the loss of his law practice and career in the Alberta legal

profession, KEMPO tried to transfer his license to the Province of British

Columbia. The Law Society of British Columbia made the conditions for

achieving that goal so financially onerous he tried to start the process of

admission to the Bar from the beginning by way of articling again and re-

taking the Bar Course. That route required the consent of the Law Society

of Alberta, which made it administratively onerous and financially

impossible. Both law societies colluded with the Canada-China alliance to

ensure he would never practice law again for the reasons stated supra. So

he pursued a second entrepreneurial venture, this time in the legal research

industry; which commenced in 1996. He incorporated Canada WebLaw.com

Inc. in British Columbia and began what became over the next four years an

undertaking comprising the acquisition of statutory provisions and case law

and legal literature excerpts and organizing them in a way that reduced

research time from hours to minutes; doing so by topics (as opposed

providing users with a search engine) and posting the subscription based

service on the Internet.

2.09 During the first quarter of 2002 the Canada-China alliance began to

and within eight months did successfully sabotage the legal research venture

by employing the same covert methodologies as what caused the failure of

Intelligent Images Research Inc. and his law practice. Further, the outcome

of the R&D program, its capabilities (hereinafter stealth cognition

 7

technologies) were deployed on him in a most aggressive way; leading to

what had been covert since 1988 to become overt. The consequence of said

sabotage and deployments was the generation of sufficient evidence for

KEMPO to commence civil litigation seeking damages for pain, suffering,

injury and economic loss. On or about September 13, 2002 he filed a

lawsuit against the Government of Canada (hereinafter the Canadian

Defendant) in the Federal Court of Canada seeking compensatory,

aggravated and punitive damages for the loss of his law practice and the

Canada WebLaw.com Inc. venture and for human rights violations. Those

operating the R&D program and deriving its benefits ensured he would be

and he was impecunious since early 1993, so he filed a motion just before

filing the Statement of Claim, in mid-July 2002, for indigent status. The

Honorable Mr. Justice Campbell granted the relief. KEMPO intended to pre-

trial amend his pleadings to seek substantially more for the torts of

interference with economic and contractual relations as a result of the

sabotage of Intelligent Images Research Inc.. He reasonably believed he

would be able to evidentiarily establish entitlement to that quantum by

drawing to the Courts attention what pioneers at the genesis of the

computer animation industry corporately earned.

2.10 In December 2002 the Canadian Defendant made two claims of

litigation privilege - national security and injury to international relations -

to prevent him from having documents in its possession that would prove or
 8

go to prove what was pled therein. The latter was a formal admission on

the court record a foreign government was involved in what was pled;

eventually discovered through extensive academic research to be the

Government of China (as described infra).

2.11 In April 2003 Associate Chief Justice Lutfy (as he then was) motu

proprio appointed himself Case Manager and thereafter in the same fashion

two more members of the Bench, Justice Francois Lemieux and Prothonotary

John Hargrave (deceased); the intention being to prevent a reasonable

inference of judicial bias that would and did fatally undermine the litigation,

to wit: prevent the case from getting to trial so as to ensure the longevity of

the R&D program and insulate those in the countrys public and private

sectors who were criminally culpable and civilly liable for it and ordering

stealth cognition deployments, i.e. the Canada-China alliance and its private

sector colluders. On October 26, 2005 the case was dismissed for want of

prosecution. The Canadian Defendant had six opportunities to challenge

KEMPOs credibility pre-trial pursuant to The Federal Court Rules (cross-

examinations on affidavit) and chose not to do so once because it knew

Lutfy A.C.J. et al. were going to engage in judicial bias to terminate the

lawsuit. Because it didnt ipso facto his credibility of all that was alleged

survived. After word reached Lutfy A.C.J. of Mr. Justice Campbells ruling

and what had been pled he, as Case Manager, ensured that all future

motions would be and were denied and all those filed by the Canadian
 9

Defendant would and did succeed. The proceedings hadnt even reached the

deposition stage when the motion to dismiss was filed. KEMPO did not

receive notice of the motion to strike pleadings from the court or the

Department of Justice counsel assigned to the file.

2.12 In May 2003 KEMPO was contacted by the DEFENDANT (hereinafter

also the Bush administration, Obama administration, former President

George W. Bush President Obama and Obama et al.) and solicited to

assist (1) with reform of Canadian governance where it threatened American

national security interests and (2) to help the DEFENDANT learn how stealth

cognition technologies functioned. He was introduced to and participated in

a sophisticated CIA and Pentagon operated global surveillance, intelligence

collection and communication system (hereinafter the diplomatic back-

channel or back-channel).

2.13 The back-channel electronically comprised what the Pentagon, CIA,

other departments and agencies of the DEFENDANT and NATO members

designed, implemented and operated during the Cold War and was

significantly upgraded after the 9/11 terrorist attack. It did then as it does

now link together the Defendant and thousands of domestically and

internationally situate public and private sector parties. They and the

DEFENDANT collectively comprise a global community of democracy and

human rights advocates (hereinafter NATO 2.0 or the organization).

 10

2.14 In early January 2004 the diplomatic back-channel commenced

operations; and the Plaintiffs home/office located at 914 950 Drake

Avenue, Vancouver, became and to this day is a publicly non-transparent

diplomacy hub (hereinafter diplomacy hub) that gave and continues to

provide the DEFENDANT the ability to communicate directly and in real or

slightly delayed real time with him, NATO 2.0 members and the Canada-

China alliance. Using his residence for this purpose had enormous strategic,

logistical and pragmatic value. It was discrete, i.e., wouldnt attract public

attention. He was exceptionally well educated and at that time a 13-year

member of the Bar; making him a competent collaborator in the pursuit of

U.S. and NATO 2.0 interests and objectives. And because of his academic

and professional attributes he was deemed reliable and trustworthy enough

to responsibly take receipt of and utilize national security and other

confidential information and processes without any risk of public disclosure.

2.15 The primary methodology of engaging the Canada-China alliance and

its millions of employees and agents stationed throughout the country was

by way of mass media assets; the objective being to generate a ubiquitous

environment of condemnation of and pressure on its leaders and middle

range operatives to voluntarily cease and desist the protested R&D program,

deploying stealth cognition technologies on KEMPO and other Canadians and

globally proliferating them. The publicly cryptic diplomacy was embedded in

most every medium (print, television, film, music and Internet content).
 11

The intent was that they could not experience anything produced in the

United States of America without being the recipient of said condemnation

and pressure.

2.16 The Canada-China alliance holus bolus adopted said methodology and

used its mass media assets so as to communicate its refusal to capitulate to

what was being demanded of it and deride NATO 2.0 for what it was seeking

to achieve. It also retaliated by launching a series of fear generating

initiatives targeting KEMPO, many of which were in the form of death threats

and representations of wanting to cause grievous bodily harm. Included in

their belligerence were more frequent deployments of stealth cognition

technologies to cause him pain, suffering and physical injury, greater use of

stalking security services personnel on the streets of Vancouver to make him

feel surrounded and suffocated and an increase in the number, types and

duration of in-home privacy invasion and disruption employing various

techniques, strategies, tactics and equipment

2.17 On February 19, 2004, fearing for his health, safety and life, KEMPO

took a Greyhound Bus to Blaine, Washington and presented himself to the

Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (hereinafter ICE)

seeking political asylum in the United States of America and to trigger an

international incident. He was so fearful of his safety he asked for and

received segregated housing; isolated from the general population and held
 12

a 5 X 9 cell. After almost three weeks in immigration detention in Seattle,

Washington he was advised by staff it was uncertain when there might be a

hearing before an immigration judge. This to KEMPO was counter-intuitive

considering NATO 2.0 and the DEFENDANT knew he had chosen this course

of action to trigger political reform in Canada.

2.18 The DEFENDANT maliciously arranged for an employee to be housed

in the adjacent cell and was instructed to night and day pound with his fists

on the wall separating them and yell and scream at the top of his lungs to

behave like a person with a serious mental condition. KEMPOs repeated

protests to ICE officials were ignored. The duration, intensity and frequency

began procuring a mental breakdown. So he voluntarily returned to

Vancouver; and upon his arrival commenced an academic research project

to ascertain the antecedents and conditions both for becoming an R&D

victim since the late 1980s and why all important motions filed in the

Federal Court of Canada lawsuit were not successful, believing he was

experiencing systemic judicial bias to perpetuate R&D longevity and insulate

the culpable and civilly liable. What was done to compel his voluntary

withdrawal of his asylum application was unlawful, an abuse of power and

government process and grossly negligent.

2.19 On March 20, 2004 former President George W. Bush entered the

back-channel to deceitfully and manipulatively announce it was the official

 13

foreign policy of the Defendant that the R&D program and the Federal Court

of Canadas bias were intolerable and condemnable. The then unknown

intention was to deceive current and future members of NATO 2.0 and

KEMPO and to manipulate them into contributing to a major multi-year,

publicly non-transparent initiative that had as its objectives the reform of

Canadian governance where it threatened U.S. national security interests

and address what was described in subsequent years as enslaving torturous

human experimentation. There were upwards of six hundred initiatives

between March 2004 and January 2009 by former President George W.

Bush, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former Secretaries of

Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Robert Gates, former Chairmen of the Joint

Chiefs of Staff Richard Meyers and Peter Pace and others. Each and every

communiqu, contribution and collaboration was disingenuous as they were

proactively facilitating a prolongation of the R&D program so the Department

of Defense, CIA and other departments and agencies of the Defendant and

several of the DEFENDANTs allies could take possession of and deploy for

various domestic and international purposes the most advanced form of

stealth cognition technologies that could be developed, field-tested and

refined by the Canada-China alliance.

2.20 At all material times the DEFENDANT knew or reasonably ought to

have known of (1) Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and

Political Rights and that upon congressional ratification as pled supra it was a
 14

constituent of U.S. law; (2) the United Nations Convention Against Torture

and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which is

also a constituent of U.S. law as the DEFENDANT ratified it on October 21,

1994; (3) Article 4 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human

Rights, which Congress adopted on December 10, 1948 and (4) presidential

Executive Orders 11905, 12036 (section 2-302) and 12333 (section 2.10).

Further, the DEFENDANT knew or reasonably ought to have known (a) that

under U.S. law executive orders have the force and effect of federal law if

Congress has acquiesced in a long-standing executive practice that is well-

known to it and (b) of the legal maxim A party cannot do indirectly what it

is prohibited from doing directly. The Canada-China alliance had achieved

critical R&D breakthroughs in the militarization of hypnosis when first

discovered in late 2002 as a result of discovering KEMPOs Federal Court of

Canada lawsuit; so instead of commencing a similar experimentation

program the Bush and then Obama administrations colluded with the said

alliance to achieve more benchmark successes; or, in the alternative,

piggybacked on its R&D program so the DEFENDANT could and

subsequently did acquire possession of stealth cognition technologies in their

most advanced form. Doing so was in violation of U.S. law and the

DEFENDANT was directly, or alternatively indirectly, a party to KEMPOs

enslavement, experimentation and torture.

 15

2.21 KEMPOs academic research, commenced in March 2004 right after

returning from Seattle, Washington, was triggered by how the Federal Court

of Canada behaved and his circumstances as pled herein dating back to the

late 1980s. He discovered a publicly unknown authoritarian paradigm of

Canadian governance operating since the early 1970s and which had its

evolutionary roots back to the inception of Canada as a sovereign nation in

the 1860s. Where the Founding Fathers and Americans fought a long and

costly war to be rid of English imperialistic rule, their Canadian counterparts

fully embraced the Monarchy. Doing so led to all that was repugnant to the

United States of America being fully embedded in the fabric of Canadas

political system and administration of justice and which has festered ever

since. Extreme political nepotism and patronage since Confederation and

the Liberal Party of Canada having cumulatively governed for three-quarters

of the 20th century led to a complete consolidation of power and wealth and

what he labeled closet authoritarianism. Inter alia, the Canada-China

alliances economic elite was and still is able to project its parochial

democracy-antithetical interests and influence across every major institution

of the state; exclusively deciding who are appointed to the courts, who

attorneys general are and who comprise the countrys political leadership on

the federal, provincial and municipal levels and the executives of law

enforcement, the military and intelligence establishments. It also had

consolidated and owns all mainstream media assets. The consequence of

these multi-generational processes is the complete loss of transparency and

 16

accountability for criminality and abuses of power by public servants and the

economic elite. He also discovered Canadas Prime Minister in the 1970s,

Pierre Elliot Trudeau, had established more than friendly relations with

Cubas then Prime Minister Fidel Castro, who at the time was Moscows man

in the Western Hemisphere; a declared enemy of the United States of

America and NATO allies during the Cold War. Given the closet paradigm

of governance it made perfect sense Prime Minister Trudeau would have a

very close and adoring relationship with his Cuban counterpart.

2.22 In addition to that bizarre foreign policy, former Prime Minister

Trudeau established the same with Chinas Chairman Mao Tse-Tung. By the

end of the 1970s Canada had become a mature base of military and

intelligence operations for the Government of China and which threatened

U.S. national and economic security interests during that period of time in

world history. Another finding, derived from a leaked joint study by the

Royal Canadian Mounted Police and Canadas spy agency, CSIS, The

Sidewinder Report, was that the leaders of the Communist Party of China

and the countrys wealthiest nationals had been invited beginning in the

early 1970s by the Government of Canada and the economic elite to

purchase ever larger swaths of the economy. KEMPO labeled the

relationship between the two governments as constituting a geo-political

marriage of the most intimate kind. One of the consequences of the

insidious evolution to closet authoritarianism and the Cuba and China

 17

relationships was the emergence of a political culture of seething hostility for

all things American a hatred so intense it rivals whats observed in the

Middle East.

2.23 In reaction to KEMPO collaborating with NATO 2.0 since January 2004,

the February 2004 asylum application, conducting efficacious academic

research and prosecuting the aforesaid Federal Court of Canada lawsuit, the

Canada-China alliance fabricated evidence that almost lead to him being

involuntarily committed into the psychiatric facility at St. Pauls Hospital

located at 1081 Burrard Street in Vancouver on or about August 7, 2004.

This was perceived by him as (1) an intimidation, harassment and fear

generation initiative seeking to punitively retaliate for these undertakings

and to cause through brazen medical slander the destruction of his academic

and professional credibility and (2) belligerence aimed at NATO 2.0 which

sought to underscore that the R&D program, deployments of stealth

cognition technologies, authoritarian governance and Chinas said base of

operations would continue regardless of what the organizations members

said or threatened. The academic research finding of closet

authoritarianism concealed behind a facade of democracy was to him

corroborated by the attempt at involuntarily incarceration. The two officers

of the Vancouver Police Department dispatched to take him into custody and

transport him to the psych ward were shown the Statement of Claim and
 18

advised of his research. They concluded he was being framed and declined

to effect an arrest.

2.24 As a direct result of these two personal heads of state relationships in

the 1970s and 1980s, the DEFENDANT labeled Canada a national security

threat and conducted surveillance on the countrys political leaders,

economic elite and all the major institutions of the State. As a result of

this nationwide monitoring the Bush administration discovered KEMPOs

Federal Court lawsuit and learned that the Canada-China alliance had

successfully developed what the CIA over decades could not. So during the

first four months of 2003 the DEFENDANT collected all the intelligence it

could about him and his pled herein circumstances; and when it completed

its investigation and assessment, he was contacted and his collaboration

assistance solicited as pled in Paragraph 2.12 herein.

2.25 When the Cold War ended, globally proliferating communism fell off

the DEFENDANTS foreign policy front burner. But when China in the early

2000s was incontestably on a trajectory to becoming a superpower, Canada

became an even more acute national security threat to American and NATO

2.0 and interests than during the Cold War.

2.26 Not only were Chinas military and intelligence operations in Canada

an exceptionally serious matter, so was the Communist Party of Chinas

 19

capital generating capabilities in the country. Further research in the

summer of 2010 confirmed what KEMPO had suspected during the latter

stages of his 2004-commenced academic investigation. Professors of

economics were contacted: Dalhousie Universitys Professor Lars Osberg,

Queens Universitys Professor Charles Beach and McMaster Universitys

Professor Michael Veall; as was Armine Yalnizyan, Senior Economist with the

Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. He concluded after speaking with

them and reading their publications that upwards if not exceeding $10

trillion had been covertly extracted from the Canadian economy since the

mid-1980s by the Canada-China alliances economic elite what academics

label prosperity theft; and a significant portion of what had been

embezzled was being used to advance the Government of Chinas global

expansionist ambitions. Its leaders have for a decade been seeking to, as

KEMPO articulated in his research, buy, bribe, seduce, lend and

capitalistically extort their way dominos-style to a global hegemony that

seriously jeopardizes the gains made by democracy, human rights and free

market capitalism in the 20th century. His findings were corroborated by

an award winning producer and investigative reporter employed by the

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Bruce Livesey. He is a producer for a

program that like 60 Minutes examines matters relating to government

corruption and impropriety. In the spring of 2012, Random House Canada

published his work Thieves of Bay Street: How Banks, Brokerages and the

Wealthy Steal Billions from Canadians. It comprises proof of how the

 20

Canada-China alliances economic elite perpetuated massively corrupt

financial and banking systems and benefited from similarly dysfunctional

government, police, courts and regulatory agencies. He offers a plethora of

case studies of citizens who thought they lived in a democracy that had an

economy governed by the rule of law, only to be deprived of their life

savings. The said elite, according to his in-depth inquiries and critical

analysis, had morphed into a wealth destroyer, a parasitic reaper of money

from the middle and working classes. He argues [T]he nature of the

Canadian establishment [is that its] modeled on the Family Compact [a]

sclerotic group of officials who dominated the legislative bodies, top

bureaucratic positions and judiciary of Upper Canada as an incestuous

pseudo-aristocracy. He further states Todays establishment coalesces in

clubby fiefdoms in Halifax, Montral, Toronto, Winnipeg, Calgary and

Vancouver, where they live and work together, protecting each others

interests; Canada is dominated by business oligopolies. KEMPO titled his

academic treatise The Last Democratic Fiefdom as a consequence of his

academic research. Mr. Livsey goes on to claim, and rightfully, The

financial, legal and regulatory establishments form close-knit, even insular,

subsections of the population; [c]aptains of industry, corporate lawyers,

bankers and mandarins [are] bound together as corporate oligopolies and

by a handful of dynastic families that dominate the economy. [] Canada,

in short, is run by very few people.

 21

2.27 During December 2004 and January 2005 the two primary research

findings of closet authoritarianism and Chinese joint hegemony plus

evidence of the R&D, deployment and global proliferation of stealth cognition

technologies were disseminated to parliamentarians, Canadian government

department and agency executives and the heads of private sector

organizations and associations in Canada.

2.28 NATO 2.0 members wanted KEMPOs research to be as independent

as possible from its genesis because American intelligence departments and

agencies had suffered significant credibility degradation in past years (i.e.,

failure to detect the 9/11 plot and errors about Iraqs weapons of mass

destruction); and the only way for his findings to be beyond reproach was if

there were no direct contributions from the DEFENDANT or NATO 2.0

members; and there were none.

2.29 The dissemination as described in Paragraph 2.27 herein outraged the

Canada-China alliance; so they engaged in more intimidation, coercion,

harassment and fear generation to punitively retaliate. Evidence was

fabricated to justify and it did successfully effect an involuntary committal

in the aforesaid St. Pauls Hospital psychiatric facility; which occurred on

February 7, 2005. Anti-psychotic drugs were administered upon admission;

and ten days later the pharmaceutical regimen was doubled causing

KEMPOs cognitions, motor functions and physiology to be adversely

 22

affected. He was released on March 10, 2005; but due to post-release

circumstances was required to keep taking anti-psychotic medications until

July 2005. He did not return to normal until September of that year.

2.30 Because the Bush administration was proactively prolonging the R&D

program, it took no formal steps to protest this unlawfulness and human

rights violation.

2.31 On October 1, 2005 the Pentagon leadership and Chairmen of the

Joint Chiefs of Staff deceitfully launched the Iraq military initiative

Operation Iron Fist, its title derived from one of KEMPOs March 2004

research chapter titles. The intent was to engage in coercive diplomacy,

defined as the threat of using extreme measures and force if whats being

demanded is not capitulated to, and make NATO 2.0 members think the

Defendant would deploy military assets against the Canada-China alliance

for failing to (1) immediately halt the R&D program, (2) compensate him for

his pain, suffering, injury and economic losses, (3) make full disclosure

about the global proliferation of stealth cognition technologies; and take

steps to (4) terminate Chinese joint hegemony to reestablish indivisible

Canadian sovereignty, (5) implement reforms to reverse the evolution of

authoritarian governance and (6) contain the Government of Chinas Soviet-

style expansionistic ambitions (hereinafter all of which are referred to as

stated objectives). Operation Iron Fist was one of what eventually would
 23

become upwards of six hundred deceptive and manipulative initiatives by the

Bush administration to perpetuate its NATO 2.0 non-transparent agenda of

facilitating the prolongation of the R&D program.

2.32 In late January 2006 the Government of Canada led by the leader of

the Liberal Party of Canada, former Prime Minister Paul Martin, lost the

federal election and The Conservative Party of Canada, headed by Stephen

Harper, assumed the helm of federal governance. NATO 2.0 members

hoped the change in leadership and political ideology would lead to achieving

stated objectives.

2.33 On February 1, 2006, intended to be the third month anniversary of

Operation Iron Fist, the Pentagon leadership and the Chairmen of the Joint

Chiefs of Staff made themselves disingenuously appear to conduct more

back-channel coercive diplomacy for the edification of the new government

of Prime Minister Stephen Harper. What was ordered was in the same

category of coercive diplomacy as that undertaken on October 1, 2005 as

described in Paragraph 2.31 herein. However, this time, as was widely

reported, live round ammunition was used, the target being Canadian

diplomats traveling by road in Bagdad, Iraqs U.S. military protected Green

Zone, to underscore that military resources could be mobilized to compel

capitulation to what NATO 2.0 members demanded viz. stated objectives.

 24

The deceptive intent of this operation was to facilitate the prolongation of

the R&D program.

2.34 At all material times the DEFENDANT led the organizations members

to be trepidatious about (1) the authoritarian paradigm of governance in

Canada, (2) Americas northern neighbor and largest trading partner being a

mature, covert base of military and intelligence operations for the

Government of China, (3) Canadas vast natural resources and other

economic attributes were being converted into capital to finance the

Government of Chinas global expansionist ambitions and (4) about the R&D,

deployment and global proliferation of stealth cognitions technologies.

2.35 By early 2006 the perception became accepted by NATO 2.0

members that KEMPO had been enslaved to the R&D program. Success in

operating the then almost twenty plus year military experiment was

achieved by way of a unique form of compelled servitude. His research led

to discovering The United Nations Supplementary Convention on the

Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade, and Institutions and Practices Similar

to Slavery which states [N]o one shall be held in servitude. And the

International Labor Organizations Convention (No. 29) Concerning Forced

or Compulsory Labour defines forced or compulsory labor as all work or

service which is exacted from any person for which the said person has

not offered himself voluntarily. Article 4 of the United Nations Universal

 25

Declaration of Human Rights, which Congress adopted on December 10,

1948, states that no one shall be held in servitude. The article entitled

Disposable People: New Slavery in the Global Economy (University of

California Press, 1999) accurately describes the kind of servitude KEMPO

experienced measured in decades. Author Kevin Bales writes that to be

enslaved is to be controlled by another person or persons so that your will

does not determine your lifes course, and rewards for your work and

sacrifices are not yours to claim.

2.36 Having been enslaved to the R&D program was accomplished not

through physical constraints like penitentiaries or psychiatric facilities; but

rather through what KEMPO labels non-custodial imprisonment as a result

of sabotaging all of his social, professional and economic opportunities since

graduating from law school in 1987 and being at all times surrounded by

security apparatus personnel which led to perpetual impoverishment and

acute societal quarantine. What was designed, implemented and adapted to

changing circumstances over the decades produced an invisible cage from

which escape was impossible. And the R&D program created a novel way

for him to not determin[e] [his] life course and rewards for work and

sacrifices made [were not his] to claim. Those rewards went only to his

enslaving, torturing, depriving experimenters and beneficiaries of the new

stealth cognition technologies capability and, in violation of U.S. law, to the

DEFENDANT.
 26

2.37 The R&D program and the deployment of stealth cognition

technologies violated the United Nations Convention Against Torture and

Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. The

Government of Canada became a signatory to said Convention on August

25, 1985 and ratified it, making it part of Canadian law, on June 24, 1987.

And the DEFENDANT became a signatory to said Convention on April 18,

1988 and Congress ratified it, making it constituent of United States law, on

October 21, 1994.

2.38 The DEFENDANTs multi-administration aggressiveness and deceit to

prolong the R&D program ipso facto made itself a ten (10) year party to

unlawful experimentation, torture and servitude.

2.39 KEMPO agreed to assist the DEFENDANT originally because he wanted

to help acquire evidence against those whod engaged in such egregious

criminal and civil malfeasance and human rights violations for so long as

pled herein. Virtually all of the 20,000 plus hours he dedicated pursuant to

the May 26, 2006 agreement (as pled infra) went to advancing American

and NATO 2.0 interests and stated objectives. He kept and regularly

updated a comprehensive diary of all activities and the results of all

undertakings trusting they would be evidentiarily useful in due course.

 27

2.40 The geographical proximity of, economic interconnectivity between

and mutual largest trading partner status of the United States of America

and Canada significantly complicated reform and accountability initiatives; so

there was no lack of appreciation in the minds of KEMPO and NATO 2.0

members how difficult achieving reform and accountability were going to be

and how long it would take for benchmark successes and positive outcomes.

He made it evident to everyone he was in it for the long haul a

commitment continually and deceitfully acknowledged and disingenuously

rewarded by the Bush and then Obama administrations in various ways

which frequently reminded him they were going to comply with their

obligations pursuant the agreement (as pled infra) in due course.

2.41 In November 2003, when original members of NATO 2.0 had shown

for more than six months they were empathetic about what KEMPO endured

for such a long period of time and wanted to assist in any way they could, he

made it known he was seeking redress that mirrored the kind of financial

success pioneers in the computer animation industry enjoyed and was going

to sue for in the Federal Court of Canada as pled herein. He naively, i.e.,

without foundation in domestic or international law, requested the

DEFENDANT trace, seize and transfer to him what he was going to seek

pursuant to the tort of interference with economic and contractual relations

from Canada-Chinas private sector colluders, the economic elite. When

said lawsuit was the victim of extreme judicial bias in October 2005 as pled
 28

herein he subsequently requested that avenue of justice be pursued.

Consequently, in March and April 2006 some of the organizations private

sector members went on the diplomatic record and indicated they believed

KEMPOs estimated quantum for the civilly illegal sabotage of Intelligent

Images Research Inc. was reasonable in the circumstances; and in doing so

articulated a NATO 2.0 membership-wide determination, deceitfully adopted

by the DEFENDANT, that him in eventual possession of that amount was a

top priority. And its remained such to the present day.

2.42 In April 2006 KEMPO inferred there had been a deployment of stealth

cognition technologies on his lawful sister, Dr. Roma Kempo B.Sc., M.D..

She was hypnotically instructed to purchase a black wig and travel to the red

light district in Vancouver and behave like a prostitute. The following month

she was instructed by way of another deployment to crave crystal

methamphetamines; and she phoned him several times a week for over a

month insisting he help her obtain a regular supply. This was procured by

the Canada-China alliance in retaliation specifically for the quantum

ratification described in Paragraph 2.41 herein.

2.43 In later years she would again become a way to retaliate against what

KEMPO and the organization were doing in pursuit of stated objectives. For

example, on October 2, 2009, which was the 60th anniversary of Chinese

communism and to brag about the lethality of what had been developed
 29

since the late 1980s, she was hypnotically instructed to travel to a desolate

part of a highway near the city of Hope, British Columbia, Canada, and

douse herself with gasoline to make it appear she was seeking to self-

immolate. Rogue members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police were

tracking her movements and when shed soaked herself, her car and her dog

they faked an intervention. She was escorted to a psychiatric facility and

involuntarily incarcerated for three weeks. President Obama deceitfully and

several NATO 2.0 members genuinely condemned this grotesque

deployment of stealth cognition technologies. Some ninety (90) days later

she was again a victim of a deployment and instructed to abandon her

residence and her family. She disappeared completely for eight months.

She contacted KEMPO in August 2010 while residing with a medical school

friend and fellow physician in Campbell River, British Columbia, Canada. It

wouldnt be for another four months she would be back in Vancouver. She

indicated in late December of that year she was going to travel to Vancouver

and for him to expect her. However, en route she was hypnotically

instructed to stand on a highway making it appear she wanted to commit

suicide by way of being struck by a speeding vehicle. Again, rogue members

of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police were tracking her movements,

intervened and delivered her to a psychiatric facility where she was

involuntarily incarcerated. When she didnt arrive at a motel she said she

would be staying at for one night, KEMPO contacted Inspector Dan Bond. He

was at the time the top executive in the Province of British Columbia for an
 30

umbrella agency of law enforcement, intelligence and security departments

of the Government of Canada. A missing persons report was filed. Within

two days KEMPO got word where she was. To ensure her subsequent safety,

he traveled to the hospital where she was being held and escorted her to

Vancouver.

2.44 On May 1, 2006 the Canada-China alliance threatened KEMPO in the

back-channel with death and simultaneously admit to having undertaken the

R&D program; what became known to all as the From Lab to Slab

utterance. This criminal and civil unlawfulness was in retaliation specifically

for whats pled in Paragraph 2.41 herein viz. NATO 2.0s ratification of

KEMPOs quantum and making it a top priority.

2.45 On May 4, 2006 former President George W. Bush responded by

engaging in coercive diplomacy in the back-channel directed at the Canada-

China alliance; threatening severe consequences if KEMPO was the victim of

foul play. The objective was to deceive and manipulate him and the

organization into collectively thinking he, his cabinet and administration

were outraged at the combination death threat and R&D program admission.

2.46 The next day, on May 5, 2006, said former President deceitfully

engaged in more coercive diplomacy. He made it appear he had used

 31

executive authority to declare what he specifically called a war against the

Canada-China alliance.

2.47 On May 26, 2006, on the instruction of said former President, former

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld as agent for the DEFENDANT entered

into an agreement with KEMPO. One term of the contract and which he

accepted was being appointed a United States Deputy Secretary of Defense.

The deceiving intention was to make it appear the Bush administration was

extremely concerned for his health, safety and life and was taking proactive

steps to all but guarantee he wouldnt be harmed in any way.

2.48 Another offer, which KEMPO accepted and comprised consideration,

consisted of the DEFENDANT in due course granting him United States

citizenship; which it has not.

2.49 An implied term the DEFENDANT agreed to and which comprised

consideration was KEMPO continuing to help ascertain how stealth cognition

technologies functioned. He would, and did, author and update a

comprehensive evidence record of what he witnessed, experienced,

perceived, thought and inferred while cognitively and/or physically

compromised by stealth cognition technologies so they could be cross-

referenced with what the Department of Defense, Central Intelligence

 32

Agency and other departments and agencies were observing, detecting and

recording, electronically or otherwise, from their vantage point.

2.50 Another implied term the DEFENDANT agreed to and comprised

consideration was to use all its resources, assets and capabilities to trace,

seize and transfer to KEMPOs possession its and NATO 2.0s ratified

quantum he was going to seek in the Federal Court of Canada lawsuit from

the assets of the economic elite that were situate in the United States of

America pursuant to former President George W. Bushs declaration of war.

2.51 Another implied term agreed to by the DEFENDANT and constituted

consideration was that KEMPO would continue to operate the diplomacy hub.

His responsibilities included documenting and then archiving back-channel

activity for the purpose of having a record of what transpired between the

DEFENDANT, NATO 2.0 and the Canada-China alliance; the intention being

to have evidence that could be used someday to procure Chinese

demilitarization and political reform and personal accountability in Canada.

2.52 Another implied term KEMPO agreed to and which constituted

consideration was he would in due course, and he did, design and implement

a series of political reform and accountability initiatives to democratize those

constituents of Canadian governance that had become authoritarian and had

 33

been afflicted by Chinese joint hegemony and which threatened U.S.

national security interests.

2.53 The DEFENDANTs pled offers and acceptances of and consideration

for said express and implied terms were fraudulent, deceptive and

manipulative. The DEFENDANTs sole intention was to facilitate the

prolongation of the R&D program so it would in due course be in possession

of the most advanced stealth cognition technologies capabilities for its own

domestic and international purposes. It never had any intention of tracing,

seizing and transferring to KEMPOs possession what NATO 2.0 ratified as

pled herein.

2.54 KEMPO relied and acted in good faith upon said offers, acceptances

and considerations to his extreme detriment; expending in the fulfillment of

his obligations under the agreement in excess of 20,000 hours between May

26, 2006 and when discovering the deceit on or about February 20, 2011.

At all material times the Bush and Obama administrations knew their offers,

acceptances, considerations motivated KEMPO to continue fulfilling his

obligations and responsibilities under the agreement and thereby expecting

at some time in the future taking receipt of what the DEFENDANT had

contractually ratified.
 34

2.55 To perpetuate the within pled deceptions and manipulations that

facilitated the prolongation of the R&D program, former President George W.

Bush, members of his cabinet and administration officials began during the

first quarter of 2007 a very aggressive international recruitment campaign to

enlarge and make more global the organization. Each time a public sector

party announced in the diplomatic back-channel it was a new NATO 2.0

member or wanted to contribute to advancing stated objectives, it reinforced

for KEMPO the bona fides of the May 26, 2006 agreement and the

DEFENDANT knew that to be the case. The following government leaders

and world figures entered the back-channel on the dates specified and

expressly confirmed having joined NATO 2.0 or were wanting to be observed

by its members and the Canada-China alliance as being contributors in the

attainment of stated objectives:

British Prime Minister Blair December 7, 2006

Mexican President Calderon April 21, 2007

NATO Secretary General de Hoop Scheffer May 21, 2007

Australian Prime Minister Howard May 23, 2007

Israeli Prime Minister Olmert June 19, 2007

Russian President Putin July 2, 2007

British Prime Minister Brown July 30, 2007

 35

Chilean Foreign Minister Foxley August 8, 2007

ASEAN member leaders September 7, 2007

Indonesian President Bambang Yudhoyono September 8, 2007

Portuguese Prime Minister Scrates September 19, 2007

Bolivia President Morales September25, 2007

Quatar Foreign Mnister Al-Thani October 2, 2007

Prime Minister & VP U.A.E. Al Maktoum October 14, 2007

Egyptian Foreign Minister Gheiton October 16, 2007

French President Sarkozy November 7, 2007

Japanese Prime Minister Fukuda November 16, 2007

Australian Prime Minister Rudd November 26, 2007

Palestine President Abbas November 27, 2007

El Salvador President Saca November 29, 2007

Italian President Napolitano December 11, 2007

Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt December 14, 2007

Pakistani President Musharraf March 8, 2008

Ireland Prime Minister Ahern March 17, 2008

 36

Bahamas Prime Minister Ingraham March 20, 2008

Barbados Prime Minister Thompson March 20, 2008

Belize Prime Minister Barrow March 20, 2008

Thailand Foreign Minister Pattama March 20, 2008

Indian Foreign Minister Mukherjee March 24, 2008

Romanian Prime Minister Popescu-Tariceanu April 4, 2008

HRH Swedish King Carlos XVI Gustaf April 21, 2008

Guatemalan President Colom April 28, 2008

Germany Chancellor Merkel June 19, 2008

Italian President Berlusconi June 12, 2008

Philippines President Arroyo June 24, 2008

Iraq President Talabani June 25, 2008

Lithuanian Prime Minister Kirkilas July 2, 2008

Kosovo President Sejdiu July 18, 2008

Pakistan Prime Minister Gillani July 28, 2008

South Korean President Myung-Bak August 6, 2008

Thailand Prime Minister Samak August 6, 2008

 37

European Commission President Barroso October 18, 2008

Brazilian Prime Minister da Silva March 14, 2009

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu May 18, 2009

British Prime Minister Cameron June 17, 2009

Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh November 25, 2009

Norwegian Prime Minister Stoltenberg December 11, 2009

2.56 During April, May and up to June 19, 2006 there were in excess of

400 individual back-channel initiatives by NATO 2.0 members and

contributors to achieving its stated objectives. These undertakings

continued to condemn and put reform and accountability pressure on the

Canada-China alliance.

2.57 On June 19, 2006 the Canada-China alliance deployed stealth

cognition technologies on KEMPO; causing his upper and lower teeth to

violently pinch his tongue that procured a quarter inch bleeding laceration.

He immediately thereinafter requested the Bush administration for and it

deceptively and manipulatively granted what in the administration of justice

is a cease and desist injunction. The primary provision was assessing

quantum against the Canadian governments colluders, the economic elite,

as a form of punitive deterrent that doubled on the Monday of every week

that the herein pled human rights violations occurred during the previous
 38

seven day period. He authored and maintained a daily evidence record of all

types of criminal and civil malfeasance, known to everyone as the Daily

Torture Diary; documenting it all and to prove these ever-increasing

damages were justifiable.

2.58 On June 26, 2006 former President George W. Bush entered the back-

channel to agree on behalf of the DEFENDANT that this political injunction

was warranted in the circumstances. He thereafter entered the back-

channel every single Monday (with nominal exception) and until the end of

October 2006 to deceitfully and manipulatively state on the diplomatic

record doubling was warranted: June 26, July 3, July 10, July 17, July 24,

July 31, August 7, August 14, August 21, September 4, September 11,

September 18, September 25, October 2, October 16, October 23 and

October 30, 2006. Each and every one of these appearances was believed

by KEMPO and NATO 2.0 members to be motivated by the desire to

demonstrate to the Canada-China alliance there were severe financial

consequences for its unlawful, human rights violating and improprietous

conduct. The deceitful intention of each one was to facilitate the prolongation

of the R&D program and to service KEMPO and NATO 2.0s belief in the bona

fides of the agreement pled supra.

2.59 Beginning in early 2006 and becoming more so in early 2007 the size

of NATO 2.0s private sector membership increased in the United States of

 39

America and globally as a direct result of the Bush administrations recruiting

efforts and by way of word of mouth in the multitudinous personal,

professional and corporate networks of associations of existing members.

Joining were hundreds of large and multinational corporation executives,

Wall Street stock market, banking and investment executives and

participants and corporate executives in the television, movie, music, sports

and fashion industries. The historic parallel of the organization and its

stated objectives was the Cold War and the worldwide mass mobilization of

Americans and citizens of western countries; the objective of which was to

defeat the former Soviet Union. The only differences between that

circumstance and the one pled herein are the nature of the adversary and

the existence of NATO 2.0 never being made public.

2.60 One event that helped trigger the swift increase in public and private

sector membership occurred on December 7, 2006 when former President

George W. Bush held a joint press conference in the Dwight D. Eisenhower

Executive Office Building in Washington, District of Columbia (hereinafter

D.C.) with his British counterpart, former Prime Minister Tony Blair. That

date was intentionally and deceptively chosen because it was a Pearl Harbor

anniversary and there was a parallel between the Government of Japans

sneak attack on the State of Hawaii and the stealth component of stealth

cognition technologies.
 40

2.61 From late 2006 and until the end of the Bush administration in

January 2009 there were many dozens of press conferences of this type and

involving former President George W. Bush and several of his cabinet

secretaries and international counterparts that were converted into back-

channel events; each of which pursued the policy of perpetuating deception

to prolong the R&D program and service the bona fides of the agreement as

pled herein. And during that time the organizations private sector members

were expending vast amounts of capital, cumulatively hundreds of millions

of dollars, to finance their respective and at times collaborative initiatives;

and thousands of times during that period of time and to the present did

they ratify KEMPOs quantum which assured him that at some point in the

not too distant future hed be in receipt of same. In December of that year

the DEFENDANT engaged in two initiatives that ratified same.

2.62 A major deceptive, manipulative and R&D program facilitation-

motivated undertaking by the DEFENDANT was on April 10th, 2007.

Pursuant to instructions from then President George W. Bush, former

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice indicated KEMPO had been appointed to

the position of United States Deputy Secretary of State. The belief

generated amongst NATO 2.0 members and him was that this was formal

recognition of his high caliber academic and professional competence and

having commendably dedicated himself to advancing the national security

interests of the United States of America, viz. the threat and menace posed
 41

by the Canada-China alliance, and year-after-year tenaciously pursuing

NATO 2.0s stated objectives. This also supplemented the disingenuous

Deputy Secretary of Defense appointment as pled in Paragraph 2.47 herein.

And it serviced the perception of the bona fides of the agreement pled supra.

2.63 Just how convinced KEMPO was of said bona fides and the Bush

administrations commitment to NATO 2.0s stated objectives, he started to

plan ways of effecting reform and accountability. For example, in 2007 he

conceptualized The Custodian-in-Council, what was analogous to what had

been implemented in Germany and Japan at the end of the Second World

War by the Allies, and how it would be structured and who would comprise

its executive.

2.64 KEMPOs academic research that began in March 2004 upon return

from his Bush administration sabotaged asylum application as pled herein

was for the most part completed in May 2007. His first major undertaking

that pursued reform of Canadian governance and would procure personal

and institutional accountability targeting those who were responsible for

authoritarian rule, Chinese joint hegemony, the R&D program and stealth

cognition technologies deployment and proliferation commenced during the

first week of August 2007. He spent the next eight months telephoning,

emailing and faxing parliamentarians in Canadas House of Commons and

Senate and public sector organizations across the country to disseminate his
 42

findings in the hopes the nationwide edification campaign would trigger

awareness, investigations and reform and accountability initiatives. He also

filed many dozens of administrative and disciplinary complaints against past

and current prime ministers, cabinet secretaries and other high ranking

appointees where in his view the evidence proved they were directly

responsible while in office. By July 2009 he had extended the edification

campaign to and contacted cabinet ministers on the provincial level of

government and most all city councils.

2.65 In March 2010 KEMPO launched The Reform Coalition of Canada;

which extended edification to the private sector. However, there was no

dissemination on matters related to the R&D program and the 21 st century

Pandoras Box it created. By August of that year hed directly contacted

over three hundred (300) organizations, associations and groups.

2.66 Throughout August and September 2010 and on a daily basis the

Canada-China alliance bragged in the back-channel that the R&D program,

deployment and global proliferation of stealth cognition technologies violated

the Statute of Romes prohibition against crimes against humanity. On

August 23, 2010 KEMPO emailed correspondence to and filed a complaint

with the International Criminal Courts Office of the Prosecutor; located at

2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands. On August 30th M.P. Dillon, Head of
 43

Information & Evidence Unit in the Office of The Prosecutor, confirmed

receipt by email and stating:

We will give consideration to this communication, as appropriate,

in accordance with the provisions of the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court. As soon as a decision is reached, we
will inform you, in writing, and provide you with reasons for this
decision.

2.67 Submissions were made and more evidence provided on September

1st, 21st and 29th and October 6th, 2010.

2.68 During the first week of January 2011 KEMPO launched The Article 7

Accountability Institute; the objective being to extend the edification

campaign to the United States of America. Posted online was his diary of

systemic unlawfulness and human rights violations and a large amount of

the diplomacy archive as pled herein. During that month and the one that

followed he directly contacted around one hundred and twenty (120) private

sector organizations, associations, groups, church executives, university

professors and small, medium and large newspapers. He also called every

human rights organization he could find through Internet searches, seeking

their assistance viz. what the governments of Canada and China did to him

in violation of Article 7 of (1) the International Covenant on Civil and Political

Rights, (2) the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
 44

Degrading Treatment or Punishment and (3) the Universal Declaration of

Human Rights. He also called a couple dozen attorneys seeking legal

representation to commence litigation in U.S. courts against the Government

of Canada. Nothing whatsoever resulted from that effort.

2.69 On February 5, 2011 then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was

observed to have been responsible for an exceptionally elaborate back-

channel initiative. She said that the process of achieving NATO 2.0s stated

objectives was going to be a gradual one. This triggered in KEMPO on or

around February 20, 2011 an epiphany, namely that neither the Bush nor

Obama administrations ever had any intention of assisting the organization

to be successful in pursuing or achieving stated objectives or fulfilling the

terms of the agreement pled supra because both had been facilitating a

prolongation of the R&D program and using disingenuous diplomacy to

conceal same. His first step after publishing his opinion for the edification

of NATO 2.0 members was to file a criminal complaint on February 23, 2011

with the Federal Bureau of Investigations Directorate of Intelligence

Division, located at 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C.. In the

coming months, a dozen or so complaints and requests for investigations

were sent to relevant Inspectors General, congressional House and Senate

committees and sub-committees and other accountability agencies.

 45

2.70 On February 28, 2011 at his first opportunity since the filing of the

said Federal Bureau of Investigation criminal complaint, President Obama

instructed then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to go on the diplomatic

record and state he and his administration were now going to pursue a new

approach based on concrete steps. He disingenuously made it appear his

goal was now to pursue stated objectives and comply with the terms of the

agreement pled supra; as he knew many members of NATO 2.0 could go

domestically and internationally public with what the epiphany exposed and

deliver a serious if not fatal credibility blow to his presidency and

administration. However, his real intent was to perpetuate the deceptions

and manipulations and R&D facilitation pled herein and for the reasons

stated.

2.71 Many NATO 2.0 members immediately agreed with and fully accepted

what KEMPOs epiphany exposed. Outraged at two successive

administrations having engaged in anti-democratic, systemic unlawfulness

and abuses of power, shocking abdications of national security responsibility

and intolerable improprieties, they commenced an aggressive condemnation

and pressure campaign aimed at President Obama, Vice-President Biden,

former Secretary of State Clinton, former Secretary of Defense Gates,

former Central Intelligence Agency Director Panetta and former Chairman of

the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mullen, whoever else in the administration was
 46

complicit but unidentified (hereinafter Obama et al.) and their

predecessors.

2.72 For the next year and on a regular, often daily, basis NATO 2.0

members used many non-public means to persuade Obama et al. to comply

with the terms of the agreement pled supra and pursue stated objectives.

During the months following the epiphany, world leaders and figures

condemned them or otherwise weighed in; inter alia, Brazilian President

Rousseff, Italian President Napolitano, German Chancellor Merkel, British

Prime Minister Cameron, former Russian President Medvedev and former

French President Sarkozy.

2.73 On March 22, 2011 KEMPO received emailed correspondence from

M.P. Dillon, Head of the Information & Evidence Unit in the Office of

International Criminal Courts Prosecutor, stating:

As you may know, the International Criminal Court (the ICC or

the Court) is governed by the Rome Statute, which entrusts the
Court with a very specific and carefully defined jurisdiction and
mandate. A fundamental feature of the Rome Statute is that the
Court may only exercise jurisdiction over persons for the most
serious crimes of concern to the international community as a
whole, namely genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes,
as defined in the Rome Statute (Articles 6 to 8). The Court may
only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on or after 1 July
 47

2002 (Article 11). In addition, the Court may only exercise

jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a State that
has accepted the jurisdiction of the Court or by a national of such a
State (Article 12), or where the Security Council refers the
situation to the Court (Article 13). Accordingly, I regret to advise
you that your communication appears to relate to matters outside
the jurisdiction of the Court. The Prosecutor has therefore
confirmed that there is not a basis at this time to proceed with
further analysis.

2.74 The fact is the Government of Canada signed the Statute of Rome on

December 18, 1998 and ratified it making a constituent of the nations law

on July 7, 2000. The blatantly false representation of law about a lack of

jurisdiction and the more than suspicious timing of the decision to terminate

the review of what was alleged given the domestic and international outrage

and condemnation led KEMPO and many NATO 2.0 members to reasonably

infer Obama et al. and their R&D-colluding international counterparts had

engaged in behind-the-scenes obstruction of justice to prevent themselves

and predecessors from being publicly linked to crimes against humanity.

2.75 During the summer of 2011 congressional leaders, including Speaker

of the House John Boehner, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Senate

Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell,

intervened in the hopes their collective involvement would placate the

 48

organization, prevent publicity that would lead to historic scandal and

procure a settlement of outstanding grievances. They were not successful.

2.76 NATO 2.0s condemnation and pressure campaign was relentless

throughout the autumn and early winter. Then on February 17, 2012, as a

direct result of th sustained and global effort, President Obama appeared to

have capitulated. He, Speaker of the House John Boehner and House

Chairman of the Budget Committee Paul Ryan collectively pronounced that

Congress by legislation had allocated funds (hereinafter the allocation) to

in part settle KEMPOs legal claim and in part to advance stated objectives.

2.77 For several months after that milestone there were a multitude of

instances of corroborating or otherwise affirming the allocation by NATO 2.0

members; and upwards of twenty-five members of Congress on both sides

of the isle did as well. Then when there was no transference to KEMPO of

what had been said to be allocated, many from the organization and

Congress since then and to the present day condemned President Obama.

The perception arose and the allegation was made and is now pled that he

refused to do so because he, his administration and their R&D-colluding

international counterparts wanted to continue to prolong the R&D program

so it would develop a more powerful and deadly set of capabilities. The

refusal to transfer and condemnation and pressure persisted throughout the

rest of 2012 and during all of 2013 and 2014 as the DEFENDANT believed no
 49

member of the organization or a collection of them would procure publicity

and trigger a historic political scandal.

2.78 Believing in the bona fides of the allocation pronouncement and what

corroborated and affirmed it, KEMPO launched the reform-pursuing, e-

referendum direct democracy Canadian Citizens Party, which was going to

employ democratic protocols, i.e., the election process, to bring much

needed change to the country and evict what of Chinese interests were

unconstitutional, in violation of the international law of sovereignty and

which threatened U.S. interests. And he launched The Canadian

Governance Reform Council, an academic institute which would be one of

several organizations, like The Internet Voting Association of Canada and

The Prosperity Theft Accountability Project, which would pursue electoral

success.

2.79 By mid-summer 2012 the inference was drawn that the allocation

wasnt going to be transferred to KEMPOs possession; so in anticipation of

litigation he spent from mid-August 2012 to the third week of November

2012 preparing a litigation evidence record. He also considered what was

being authored as publishable and converted it into an eBook and posted it

online; entitling it A Presidents Worst Nightmare: The Scandal that Dwarfs

Watergate. After discovering major publishers only dealt with literary

agents and not authors directly, he spent the entire month of October 2012
 50

seeking their services. He sent more than three hundred (300) American

queries during that period and to some that were foreign situate. Sharon

Marples, a London, England literary agent at The Susijn Agency Ltd., whose

focus is on authors with international appeal, emailed him back stating

Thank you very much for contacting us about your work; we read it with

enthusiasm and were impressed by its originality and engaging narrative

style. The company as did all others declined to represent him.

2.80 Beginning at the end of November 2012 and until the first week of

January 2013, KEMPO conducted an edification campaign for those in the

United States of America who were executive members of Tea Party

organizations. At the conclusion of the campaign he had contacted and

presented his eBook to some one hundred and eighteen (118) Tea Party

executives in forty-six (46) states. The objective of the campaign was to

inform them about what his epiphany had exposed and NATO 2.0s

international movement to deliver reform and accountability to the

DEFENDANT; recommending they circulate what had been discovered

throughout their networks to procure a mobilization of the Conservative base

and which would eventually lead to publicity in their jurisdictions and

thereafter nationally.

2.81 When the campaign failed to achieve the objective of triggering

countrywide awareness of what the epiphany exposed KEMPO began seeking

 51

U.S. legal representation. One of his Tea Party recipients, John Tweedell,

who resides at 1606 Pineview Lane, Hideaway, Smith County, Texas,

introduced him to Gary Jackson Esq., whose law office is at 15001 CR 472,

Lindale, Texas. He had not only the requisite training, knowledge and legal

experience to competently assist, having been at the Texas State Bar for 53

years and had been admitted to appear before sixty (60) federal, state, local

and county courts throughout the United States of America, hed been a

Judge of the Texas Municipal Court (Arlington) from July 1966 through to

September 1969 and thereafter a Special Prosecutor for the United States

Department of Justice. He is also a member of the following: the American

Bar Association, Dallas Bar Association, Dallas County Criminal Bar

Association, Delta Theta Phi Law Fraternity, Federal Bar Association, National

Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys, Smith County Bar Association,

Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association and The Association of Trial

Lawyers of America.

2.82 He also possessed a most unique and highly relevant and

exceptionally valuable series of military credentials and attributes. On

October 1, 1953 he joined the military and retired on December 15, 1976

with the rank of Colonel (Military Intelligence). During this period he was a

Judge Advocate (July 1974, 1976) and a Strategic Intelligence Officer (1976,

Designation 35B00). Other assignments included: Commander, 95th

Maneuver Training Command, Division Chief, Bravo Division (Engineers),

 52

MTC, Commander, 4th Brigade (OSUT), 95th Division (Training) and

Commander, 417th Military Intelligence Detachment (Strategic), Since

November 1979 he was and currently is an Adjunct Faculty Member of the

U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

Most of his security clearances are as follows: July 16, 1969: Security

Investigation for appointment to a sensitive United States Department of

Justice position completed favorably by United States Department of Justice

and the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and November 15, 1976: Final top

secret clearance awarded by HQ, FORSCOM, Fort McPherson, Georgia,

following a Special Background Investigation by the Defense Investigative

Agency. Civilian and military commendations, honors and awards include:

April 20 1971: Commendation, Director, FBI, Washington, DC; December

10, 1971: Special Achievement Award, Attorney General, United States

Department of Justice, Washington, DC; April 18, 1972: Commendation,

Director, FBI, Washington, DC; September 29, 1974: Appreciation Plaque,

US Department of Justice; 2003: Military Order of the World Wars,

Commander, Tyler. He received these military medals: 1972: Armed Forces

Reserve Medal; 1982: Meritorious Service Medal; 1984: Army Achievement

Medal; 1986: Meritorious Service Medal.

2.83 In April 2013 Mr. Jackson agreed to provide legal representation on a

pro bono basis. In return and given the foregoing accomplishments and
 53

credentials, KEMPO offered to write his biography; which was accepted and

of which counsel was very appreciative.

2.84 KEMPO traveled to the State of Texas on April 25, 2013 and resided at

Mr. Jacksons residence, located at 15000 CR 472, Lindale, Texas.

Throughout the month of May he had full access to his law office and its

resources. The two discussed strategy on a regular basis for filing and

prosecuting the within Complaint.

2.85 During the third week of May 2013 KEMPO contacted The United

States of America Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and

by way of its website made an appointment to be interviewed by an ICE

official; the purpose of which was to again file a political asylum application.

The DEFENDANT shortly thereafter made direct contact with Mr. Jackson and

asked him to, and he did, evict KEMPO from his premises. Doing so was to

prevent what was predicted by it and him to be a successful application. Mr.

Jackson not only authored correspondence to him giving notice of

withdrawing as counsel, he instructed his son whod been called to his

residence to escort KEMPO to the airport and to forward to ICE his letter to

the Agency indicating he was revoking his invitation to KEMPO to be in the

United States of America and he that should be deported. Within days of the

DEFENDANTs unlawfulness and abuse of power and government process he

 54

was back in Vancouver. It compelled his return knowing he would be further

experimented upon and tortured, and he was.

2.86 The DEFENDANTs criminal and civil unlawfulness, abuses of power

and human rights violations actually began when KEMPO was flying to

Texas. During his hour-long stopover in Phoenix, Arizona on April 25, 2013

he was a victim of a very aggressive deployment of stealth cognition

technologies of the type described in Paragraph 295(iv) infra; what would be

one of hundreds during his one month stay there. He experienced and

endured most everything the Canadian-China alliance had done to him

measured in decades that violated U.S. law and ratified human rights codes.

This led to the reasonable inference and he now alleges the fact that said

alliance had been colluding with rogue personnel in the DEFENDANTS

military, intelligence, security departments and other agencies ever since the

February 2004 political asylum application as pled herein; or, in the

alternative, the DEFENDANT has since then been colluding with its

international counterparts and was more substantially piggybacking on the

R&D program than first believed.

2.87 To mitigate the loss of Gary Jackson Esq. as counsel of record, during

the entirety of June 2013 KEMPO contacted several dozen law firms situate

in Washington, D.C.; the purpose of which was to secure legal

representation. By the end of the month he was unsuccessful and developed

 55

the reasonable inference that rogue personnel employed by the DEFENDANT

were contacting the lawyers he spoke to and made slanderous

representations that sabotaged obtaining counsel. In an attempt overcome

this obstruction of justice, he contacted Mr. Don Reid, of 6 Water Street

East, Summerside, Prince Edward Island, Canada. He became a board

member of the pled herein Canadian Governance Reform Council. Inter alia,

from 1990 to the present Mr. Reid worked side-by-side with the Attorney

General / Minister of Justice of the Province of Prince Edward Island,

Canada. From 2007 to 2010 he was the President of the Prince Edward

Island Chambers of Commerce. In 2008 he was the Vice-Chairman of the

Atlantic Provinces Chambers of Commerce. And from 2011 to 2012 he was

the Chairman of the Board of the Atlantic Provinces Chambers of Commerce.

Apprised of having not retained counsel for the reasons pled herein, he said

he would contact the dozen or so lawyers he knew, most in New York, State

of New York; and felt thoroughly confident he would be able to procure legal

representation. By the end of August 2013 he was shocked at not having

been able to secure counsel and agreed with KEMPOs inference rogue

personnel employed by the DEFENDANT were engaging in obstruction of

justice to prevent the retention of counsel.

2.88 Because KEMPO was not able to secure legal representation for the

reasons pled herein, he drew the reasonable inference and does now allege

that failing to obtain a literary agent was also as a result of the DEFENDANT
 56

taking civilly unlawful steps to sabotage a publishing deal. And the same

allegation is made viz. the activities and failed pursuits related to The Article

7 Accountability Institute as pled herein.

2.89 In September 2013 Mr. Reid agreed to assist in filing complaints to

the appropriate American agencies and organizations; sending

correspondence to the Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in

Washington, D.C., located at 601 4th Street NW, Washington, D.C.; Office of

the Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York, N.Y., located at 23rd Floor, 26

Federal Plaza, New York, N.Y.; The District of Columbia Bar, located at Suite

200, 1101 K Street NW, Washington D.C., attention: Katherine A.

Mazzaferri, CEO; New York State Bar Association, located at 1 Elk Street

Albany, New York, N.Y., attention: Patricia K. Bucklin, Esq., Executive

Director; and the American Bar Association, located at 321 North Clark

Street, Chicago, IL, attention: Jack Rives, Executive Director. Mr. Reid

submitted to them the following:

In early July of this year, Canadian lawyer Brad Kempo, who Ive
known since July 2011, asked me to help him find counsel who
would represent him in a pending lawsuit against the United States
government; to be filed in the Washington D.C. jurisdiction of the
U.S. District Court. During the entire month of June, he contacted
virtually all the medium and large firms in the Washington D.C.
area, but to no avail. Knowing lawyers employed at a dozen plus
New York firms, one of whom specializes in the relevant area, was
a member of the Chambers of Commerce and is a friend of long
 57

standing, I solicited their and his assistance. At the

commencement of this process I was certain representation would
be forthcoming. Over the years I have become fully edified about
the facts and circumstances of the proposed claim. Mr. Kempos
inference that agencies of the proposed Defendant are proactively
preventing him from securing counsel, which constitutes
obstruction of justice, has to my full satisfaction been proven as a
result of my efforts not being successful. I formally request each
of the named recipients of this correspondence conduct an
investigation and make queries individually or collectively to
identify those responsible and hold them accountable.

2.90 NATO 2.0s campaign of condemnation of and pressure on President

Obama to transfer what was said to have been allocated as pled herein

continued unabated to the present day. All that was done was not

efficacious.

2.91 Beginning in early 2004 it became apparent to NATO 2.0 members

and the Bush administration and thereafter the Obama administration back-

channel activity often antagonized the Canada-China alliance to the point it,

in defiant retaliation, deployed stealth cognition technologies on KEMPO and

his sister as pled herein to cause them pain, suffering and physical injury.

2.92 KEMPOs research concluded in addition to whats pled herein that

each new generation of Canadian rulers in the 20th century looked back to

see what their parents and grandparents got away with and pushed the
 58

envelope of systemic corruption and criminality further and further; such

that by the 1970s they had become clinically sociopathic. The introduction

of communist Chinas serial human rights abusing culture thereafter

procured clinical psychopathology. Its a widely accepted fact in academic

circles that most all authoritarian paradigms of governance are perpetuated

by those suffering one or the other psychological affliction.

2.93 What KEMPO experienced during the last quarter century viz. (1)

military experimentation, (2) hypnosis torture, (3) social, intimacy,

professional and financial deprivation and (4) retaliation coercion,

intimidation, harassment and fear generation has been and continues to be

extremely infantile; being so due to the insidious devolution of Canadian

democracy to closet authoritarianism and clinical psychopathology. The

multi-institutional pubescence he endured, and was well known by the Bush

and Obama administrations that emboldened it all as a result of their

facilitating R&D prolongation and loathed by NATO 2.0 members, was of a

type not ever observed in the West. Modern sensibilities about the rule of

law, respect for the dignity of the individual, an appreciation for privacy and

the limitations on and legislated protections against invading and disrupting

it and restrictions on government in compromising the freedom of citizens

have since the 1980s been totally absent in Canada at the intersection of

power, wealth, authoritarianism and Chinese joint hegemony.

 59

2.94 The torture he experienced and for such a vast period of time as a

result of stealth cognition technologies R&D and deployment, antagonized or

otherwise, and other strategies and tactics known to the DEFENDANT to

create an inescapable nightmare for KEMPO, occurred in a non-stop and

most ubiquitous way: most often several and frequently many times an

hour, every hour of every day, week, month and year. For example, on

December 12, 2013 while documenting back-channel activity, there were

209 deployments in a two hour period; which comprised on average 1.7

violations of the law and human rights codes every minute. The Bush and

Obama administrations, being fully cognizant of this egregious malfeasance,

were the proximate cause of these deployments. The DEFENDANT breached

the duty of care it owed him; the duty arising as a result of it and KEMPO

being members of NATO 2.0 and the agreement pled supra. Because it

knew of this cause and effect and had no concern whatsoever what he was

experiencing as a result of its back-channel activity, the duty was breached

in a most gross manner.

2.95 Deployments of stealth cognition technologies to cause KEMPO pain,

suffering and physical injury and being made to feel thoroughly violated and

to threaten, coerce, intimidate, harass, annoy and inconvenience procured:

(i) sensations of itchiness in the areas of the groin, taint and

anus and other parts of the body; every hour of every day;
and often upon awaking and going to sleep;
 60

(ii) simultaneous itching of multiple areas of the body; several

times a day;

(iii) the physiological growth of itchy lesions on the skin in the

groin and other areas of the body to cause days of itchiness
and requiring the use of medicating cream; several times a
year;

(iv) making jaw muscles contract while eating, drinking, yawning

or talking and causing lacerations, sometimes of the bleeding
kind, in the mouth; several times a week;

(v) the manipulation of jaw and throat muscles to trigger gagging

on food to create sensation of choking; several times a
month;

(vi) the throat to contract that has the sensation of hard swallows,
dozens to upwards of a hundred times a day;

(vii) the hand to jerk while shaving to knick the lower nostril lip or
when trimming public hairs to draw blood; twice in 2006 and
not after adopting a different way to shave and trim;

(viii) itches to references on television or the Internet that relate to

death, a novel way of uttering such threats, serious bodily
injury and sexual issues; many times a week and sometimes
several times a day;

(ix) sensations of eye fog a thick film over eye to impair vision;
several times a month;
 61

(x) sensations of having a speck in eye, causing discomfort and

eyelids to blink; several times a month;

(xi) sensations of mouth drooling; several times a week and

occasional for hours at a time;

(xii) sensations of having dry mucus on nostril lip; several times a

week; occasionally when trying to fall asleep and upon
waking;

(xiii) erections and desires for sexual interaction while awake and
when waking up; several times a week;

(xiv) the scripting of dreams to involve sexual and perverted

conduct and experiences of being tortured, murdered and
severely injured; several times a month;

(xv) loud explosions in the minds ear when transitioning from the
sleep to wake state to cause being extremely startled;

(xvi) excruciatingly painful bowel cramps after being hypnotically

awakened; several times a year;

(xvii) involuntary movements of arms and legs to create the

sensation of being a puppet; multiple times a day;

(xviii) the temporary loss of perception and short-term memory;

and

(xix) tag-teams of the foregoing while, inter alia, engaging in back-

channel activities documentation, watching television,
 62

conducting errands, exercising, preparing meals, eating,

talking on the phone, taking showers and using the toilet; the
objective being to create a ubiquity of and inescapability from
hypno-torture and an environment of fear and intimidation;
every hour of every day.

2.96 Stealth cognition technologies have many nefarious, unlawful and

human rights violating usages. One of them has grave national and

economic security implications in the field of military and industrial

espionage. This next generation of covert capabilities involves

surreptitiously compromising the cognitions of those with top secret security

clearances and corporate executives in possession of valuable trade secrets.

A primary R&D breakthrough was the hypnotic bifurcation of consciousness

whereby the victim is perceptually unaware s/he is being queried about that

which is being sought. A consequence of this approach is there being no

awareness or evidence of said espionage.

2.97 Other usages, and which most all members of NATO 2.0 agree,

include what KEMPO labeled hypno-rape, hypno-theft and hypno-

battery. Each finding derives from experiences he had or events that

occurred in the 1990s, 2000s and 2010s. The first involves hypnotically

instructing a victim to have intense passionate feelings for a person which

otherwise would not exist and which leads to sexual intimacy. The second

involves bifurcating consciousness and instructing the victim to hand over a

possession. The third involves bifurcating consciousness such that the

 63

victim experiences the physical attack itself but is unable before and after to

identify the batterer(s).

2.98 Another usage that also shocked NATO 2.0 members was hypno-

murder or what KEMPO also labeled surreptitious assassination without

culpability; comprising the deployment of stealth cognition technologies

over a significant period of time that eventually causes a victim to commit

suicide. KEMPO experienced a plethora of times over the decades ideations

of suicide, as did his sister. And he reasonably inferred the death of a close

friend since teenagehood and who was going to be his best man at his

wedding whenever that was going to take place: Richard Barry Esq.. He was

the founder and most senior partner at an Edmonton, Alberta, Canada law

firm; was highly respected in the local legal community and judiciary; a

father of three children, someone who loved life to the fullest and had

always been psychologically normal. He committed suicide on May 8, 2012

after appearing for several months to his family and partners as suffering a

progressively more serious mental illness. The Canada-China alliance

belligerently chose that particular date because it was the fifth year

anniversary of an important milestone on NATO 2.0s calendar and it wanted

to vividly demonstrate the undeniable lethality of what it created and was

globally proliferating.
 64

2.99 As a result of the seething hatred for all things American as pled in

Paragraph 2.22 herein, KEMPO and many NATO 2.0 members reasonably

believe stealth cognition technologies are regularly deployed in the ways

pled herein on some of the millions of Americans who over the decades have

visited Canada as tourists, who are in the country on business or are

attending education facilities. This constitutes another aspect of the grave

national security threat the Canada-China alliance poses; and which was

totally ignored by the DEFENDANT and its colluding international

counterparts as they successfully pursued of a more powerful militarized

hypnosis capability.

Prayer for Relief

Wherefore the Plaintiff, BRAD KEMPO, prays for the following relief, all of

which will be proven at trial:

(1) Specific performance of all terms of the agreement;

(2) Compensatory damages;
(3) Aggravated and punitive damages; and
(4) For such incidental and other further relief the Plaintiff may show
himself justly entitled.

DATED this 28th day of January, 2014.

_____________________
The Plaintiff, BRAD KEMPO