Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.

Barrister & Solicitor [Alberta, Inactive]

914 950 Drake Avenue

Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada V6Z 2B9
Ph. 604.609.0520
bkempo@hotmail.com
Your File #: OTP-CR-274/10

September 21, 2010

International Criminal Court

Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
2500 CM The Hague
The Netherlands

Attention: M.P. Dillon, Head of Information & Evidence Unit

Via e-mail: OTP.InformationDesk@icc-cpi.int

Dear Sir/Madam:

Re: Culpability Assessment; Complaint Pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Statute of

Rome

The purpose of this correspondence is to analyze the law relating to the

jurisdiction the International Criminal Court has to prosecute for the alleged crime

against humanity.

The jurisdiction provision of the Statute of Rome, Article 17, states the following:

Issues of admissibility

1. Having regard to paragraph 10 of the Preamble and article 1, the

Court shall determine that a case is inadmissible where:
 2

(a) The case is being investigated or prosecuted by a State which has

jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable
genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution;

[]

3. In order to determine inability in a particular case, the Court shall

consider whether, due to a total or substantial collapse or
unavailability of its national judicial system, the State is unable to
obtain the accused or the necessary evidence and testimony or
otherwise unable to carry out its proceedings.

The material provisions are the State is unable genuinely to carry out the

investigation or prosecution and the State is unable to carry out its

proceedings.

Before, concomitant with and after the nationwide edification initiative (described

infra) I filed complaints with every relevant accountability mechanism in the

country:

(i) September 2002: Federal Court of Canada; filed lawsuit against

Government of Canada; dismissed;

(ii) September 2002: Canadian Security Intelligence Review

Committee (investigates unlawful conduct by officials and

employees of the Canadian Security & Intelligence Service [CSIS]);

dismissed;

(iii) July 2006: Vancouver Police Departments Professional Standards

Branch (aka Internal Affairs; investigates and disciplines law

enforcement officers, re August 2004 attempt at involuntary

 3

incarceration in a mental institution using fabricated evidence);

declined;

(iv) July 2007: RCMP Public Complaints Commission (investigates

grievances by members of the public into unlawful conduct by

federal law enforcement officers of the Royal Canadian Mounted

Police); dismissed;

(v) July & October 2007: Public Service Integrity Commission

(investigates and disciplines federal civil servants engaged in

unlawful conduct); two complaints, both dismissed;

(vi) September 2007: Leader of the Senate of Canada; request for

senatorial inquiry; declined;

(vii) September 2007: Leader of the Parliaments National Democratic

Party, Jack Layton and Leader of Parliaments Bloc Quebecois

Party (unofficial opposition parties); request for parliamentary

inquiry; declined;

(viii) October 2007: Minister of Defence and Office of the Judge

Advocate General; request for military investigations declined;

(ix) October 2007: Attorney General of Canada & Attorney General of

British Columbia; criminal complaints of being an Article 7 R&D

victim; investigations declined;

(x) March May 2008: All Canadian parliamentarian backbencher

members of the Conservative government; no action triggered or

taken;
 4

(xi) March April 2008: Eight of ten law societies; disciplinary

complaints against lawyers (high level politicians incl. prime

ministers and cabinet ministers and those in practice whose law

firms); all but one summarily dismissed; one dismissed on appeal;

(xii) September 2008: National Security Division of RCMP investigation;

named targets include the Attorney General of Canada, Rob

Nicholson, and several law society executives; terminated March

2009;

(xiii) November 2008: Canadian Judicial Council; complaint against Mr.

Lutfy. Mr. Lemieux and others; declined;

(xiv) January 2008: Senatorial committees National Security &

Defence, Human Rights, Legal & Constitutional Affairs and

Foreign Affairs and International Trade; request to appear at

hearings and to conduct investigations; all declined;

(xv) April May 2009: All mayors and city councils; request for in

camera evaluations and inquiries; none undertaken;

(xvi) June July 2009: Presidents and executives of all police chief

association (federal, provincial, municipal); no investigations or

inquiries undertaken;

(xvii) July 2009: Senate of Canada, British Columbia Senators Martin,

Greene-Raine & Neufeld, Vancouver Mayor and city council, my

member of the British Columbia legislature Minister McNeil and

Vancouver Member of Parliament Joyce Murray; request

 5

collaborative effort to compel Vancouver Police to address August

2004 unlawfulness; no action taken;

(xviii) June 2010: Clerk of Parliamentary Committee on Public Safety and

National Security; request to have Reform Coalition of Canada

appear at a hearing and give testimony on the true nature of

Canadian governance and administration of justice; declined;

(xix) August 2010: Vancouver Police Departments Professional

Standards Branch (re August 2004 attempt at involuntary

incarceration in a mental institution using fabricated evidence);

request for administrative investigation; declined;

(xx) August 2010: National Security Division of RCMP; second request

for criminal investigation into enslaving torturous human

experimentation; no confirmation of receipt of complaint; no reply or

contact by date of this submission.

Commencing in August 2007 and lasting until July 2009 I conducted a nationwide

edification initiative. I contacted virtually every parliamentarian directly (95-98%,

Senate & House of Commons), all provincial premiers and relevant cabinet

ministers, all law societies, Canadian Bar Association, most city mayors and their

councils, all law enforcement associations and all chief and associate chief

judges (with the exception of those in British Columbia, Alberta and on the

federal level). The purpose was to generate a collective awareness about the

true nature of Canadian governance that would lead to institutional reform and

personal accountability. I described myself to all as an example of what that

 6

paradigm of government produced, namely being a stealth cognition

technologies R&D victim in violation of Article 7 of the International Covenant on

Political & Civil Rights and how the Federal Court protected domestically and

internationally unlawful and unconstitutional interests, policies and practices.

Despite generating that broad awareness, no actions were taken with respect to

reform or accountability.

These results demonstrate that with respect to the criteria enunciated in Article

17 the Canadian State is unable to unable genuinely to carry out investigations,

prosecutions and proceedings relating to that which constitutes the alleged crime

against humanity.

Technically, I never filed a complaint or grievance that specifically sought

investigations, prosecutions and proceedings for this particular crime against

humanity. However, it is submitted that based on the evidence herein and what

else has been and will be delivered to your office it is a fair, reasonable and

accurate prediction (i) there would not have been any had I sought them and (ii)

nor should I now seek them there will never be any.

Canada is not only a democratically failed state, its also a rogue state for its

participation in Chinas Soviet-style global expansion that seeks to proliferate

totalitarian political and corporate cultures by in part deploying SCT to take

advantage of inherent weaknesses and vulnerabilities in government and

capitalist institutions people and consciousness itself. The factionless nature of

 7

the Canadian State prevents accountability institutions from conducting genuine

investigations, prosecutions and proceedings; and therefore the ICC has

jurisdiction.

Best regards,

Brad Kempo, Barrister & Solicitor