Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pisoschi
THE BASICS
OF
NOMINAL REFERE NCE
EDITURA UNIVERSITARIA
Craiova, 2012
Refereni tiinifici:
Prof.univ.dr. Ioana Murar
Lect.univ.dr. Mdlina Cerban
811.111
Aprut: 2012
TIPOGRAFIA UNIVERSITII DIN CRAIOVA
Str. Brestei, nr. 156A, Craiova, Dolj, Romnia
Tel.: +40 251 598054
Tiprit n Romnia
CONTENTS
I. MORPHOLOGY A BRANCH OF
LINGUISTICS.. 7
1.1. The connection between
the various branches of linguistics.... 7
1.2. The basic unit of analysis... 8
1.3. The domain of Morphology.
Derivation and inflection....12
1.3.1. The domain of Morphology.. 12
1.3.2. Derivation and inflection...13
Topics for discussion..16
V. THE PRONOUN..135
5.1. Definition..................................................................137
5.2. Characteristics........................................................137
5.3. Classification ..........................................................141
4
5.3.1. Personal pronouns......................................141
5.3.1.1. Inflection .........................................141
5.3.1.2. Reference and role in
communication .................................................154
5.3.1.3. Substantivization ...........................166
5.3.1.4. Syntactic functions.........................167
5.3.2. Possessive pronouns and
adjectives......................................................168
5.3.2.1. Characteristics................................168
5.3.2.2. Syntactic functions.........................169
5.3.2.3. Pragmatic aspects..........................170
5.3.3. SELF pronouns............................................173
5.3.3.1. Form..................................................173
5.3.3.2. Classification ..................................174
5.3.3.3. Syntactic functions and
distribution.............................................175
5.3.4. Demonstrative pronouns ...........................178
5.3.4.1. Inventory and characteristics .......178
5.3.4.2. Demonstrative adjectives ..............180
5.3.4.3. Demonstrative pronouns vs 3-rd
person personal pronouns....................184
5.3.5. Reciprocal pronouns .... ..................................187
5.3.5.1. Form .....................................................187
5.3.5.2. Meaning............................................187
5.3.5.3. Syntactic functions.........................187
5.3.5.4. Pragmatic tendencies....................188
5.3.6. Interrogative and relative pronouns..........188
5.3.6.1. Inventory and characteristics........188
5.3.6.2. Semantic and pragmatic aspects..192
5.3.6.3. Relative pronouns and
adjectives...............................................194
5
5.3.7. Indefinite pronouns......................................195
5.3.7.1. Definition...........................................195
5.3.7.2. Origin................................................196
5.3.7.3. Classification...................................196
5.3.7.4. Characteristics................................196
5.3.7.5. The all, every, each group..............197
5.3.7.6. The both, (n)either group...............199
5.3.7.7. The some, any, no group...............200
5.3.7.8. The much, many, (a) few, (a) little
group.......................................................204
5.3.7.9. The other, another group ...............205
Topics for discussion.........................................................206
BIBLIOGRAPHY..215
6
Chapter I
MORPHOLOGY A BRANCH OF LINGUISTICS
7
communication according to a multitude of criteria links
morphology to stylistics, each of us expressing
him/herself linguistically in a unique manner.
The basic linguistic levels are represented below;
except for the phonemic level characterized by form and
no content, the superior levels either generally have
semantic meaning (the morphemic level) or, even more
than that, are bound to express meaning (all the others);
as a result of that, they are in the range of study of
various branches of linguistics, their domains partly
overlapping:
1
Transposition refers to the change of the lexical class of a word; generally,
any word can become a different part of speech. It is a property but not a
necessary condition.
9
A lexeme is a unit of linguistic analysis which belongs to a
particular syntactic category, has a particular meaning or
grammatical function, and ordinarily enters into syntactic
combinations as a single word; in many instances, the identity
of the word which realizes a particular lexeme varies
systematically according to the syntactic context in which it is
to be used. (Stump, 1998: 13)
11
The structure of paradigms in a given language is
determined by the inventory of morpho-syntactic
properties available in that language. Given a lexeme L of
category C, the structure of L's paradigm is determined by
the set S of morpho-syntactic properties appropriate to C
and by the co-occurrence restrictions on these properties.
12
Rodman (1998: 94) schematize the types of English
morphemes:
- bound: affixes (derivational prefixes such as pre-, un-,
con- and suffixes such as ly, -ist, -ment or inflectional
suffixes such as ing, -s, -en, -ed, -er, est, -s) and roots (-
ceive, -mit, -fer);
- free: open class made up of content or lexical words
nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs; closed class
(function or grammatical words) conjunctions,
prepositions, articles, pronouns, auxiliary verbs.
Consequently, there appeared the necessity to
distinguish between derivation and inflection. To Valerie
Adams (1973: 30), a derived word contains at least one
bound form, with no independent existence, and with the
more general meaning that one would expect a
grammatical element to have.
13
their grammatical behavior will stem purely from the
morpho-syntactic properties that distinguish the cells of a
paradigm. (Stump, 1998: 15)
-syntactic determination
14
-semantic regularity: Inflection is semantically more
regular than derivation. (Stump, 1998: 17)
Inflection rules apply without any gaps, only the concrete
ways of doing so being different, whereas derivation rules
feature many gaps:
perspire- perspiration vs acquire -*acquiration
ambiguous ambiguate vs prestigious2- *prestigiate3
2
both the noun and the adjective had derogatory meaning till the 19-th
century; the meaning "having dazzling influence" of the adjective is attested
from 1913 while sense of "dazzling influence" of the noun first applied
1815, to Napoleon. (http://www.etymonline.com)
3
Though Philip Butterworth (2005: 184) mentions the verb to prestigiate
explained in OED as having the meaning to deceive by jugglery or as by
magic; to delude and originating in the Latin verb praestigiare, probably
altered by dissimilation from praestringere "to blind, blindfold, dazzle, once
the derogatory meaning of the noun and adjective disappeared, the verb was
no longer part of the word family; both the noun and the adjective had
derogatory meaning till the 19-th century; the meaning "having dazzling
influence" of the adjective is attested from 1913 while sense of "dazzling
influence" of the noun first applied 1815, to Napoleon.
(http://www.etymonline.com)
15
Topics for discussion
Bibliography:
16
Fromkin, V. & R. Rodman. 1998. An Introduction to
Language, 6-th edition. Boston: Thomson Heinle.
Marchand, H. 1969. The Categories and Types of
Present-day English Word Formation. Munich.
Nedelcu, C. 2004. English Grammar. Craiova:
Universitaria.
Quirk, R. & S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, J. Svartvik. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London & NY: Longman.
Stump, Gregory T. 1998. Inflection in The Handbook of
Morphology, Spencer and Zwicky, eds. Oxford:
Blackwell.
17
Chapter II
ARTICLES AS DETERMINERS
19
Position. In some languages, such as Romanian,
articles may be attached to the noun, behaving like
grammatical suffixes (casa, peisajul, oamenii, etc)
whereas in English, a predominantly analytical language,
determiners are independent words, even if they cannot
be used in the absence of a head noun. They are
invariably placed before the head noun (the central
element of the noun phrase) in English.
Classification:
-depending on the nature of the determiner as a part of
speech: lexical-grammatical classes numerals,
adjectives with restrictive and numeric value; purely
grammatical classes articles, pronominal adjectives
(possessive, demonstrative, interrogative, indefinite)4;
- depending on their position in relation to one another
(they are all pre-posed to the head noun):
predeterminers, determiners proper5/central determiners6,
postdeterminers.
4
Pronouns represent a particular case since, even if they dont have their
own lexical meaning, they borrow the meaning of the nominal antecedent
they substitute, therefore their status cannot be similar to that of
prepositions, articles, etc.
5
Gleanu-Frnoag, G., Comiel, E., 1993: 97
6
Prlog, H. 1995: 40
20
Pre- Determiners Postdeterminers Modify- Head
determiners proper/ ing noun
Ordinal Cardinal
central adjective (center of
numerals numerals,
determiners the noun
quantifying
phrase)
adjectives
all his first ten good grades
both these last pupils
double the price
much money
three- of every second small payment
quarters
7
Prlog (1995: 43) considers much as a central determinant because it can
never combine with articles. Nevertheless, it can combine with
predeterminers as in half as much time.
22
2.2. The article as a determiner
2.2.1. Definition
The definition of articles overlaps that of central
determiners in general: they are a grammatical category
which is subsumed to the class of determiners proper and
which specifies the area of reference of the noun it
accompanies.
23
2.2.3. Form. General characteristics
The article is invariable in point of form, therefore it
has no paradigm to be considered. Nevertheless, its form,
i.e. the form of the definite and the indefinite article, poses
some problems regarding both spelling and pronunciation.
In what concerns the definite article, there are
three variants of pronunciation, [ ], [i] and [i:]. The
choice is determined either by phonetic reasons, i.e. the
necessity to ease the pronunciation, or by stylistic
reasons, i.e. to emphasize the noun determined by the
article. Both definite and indefinite article have a strong
and a weak pronunciation, depending on how stressed
the noun they determine is. The second phonetic variant
of the definite article is used to make the pronunciation
easier for the nouns beginning with a vowel; the third
stresses the noun, irrespective of its initial phoneme:
The moon [ mu:n] vs [i: mu:n](stressed)
The egg [i eg] vs [i: eg] (stressed)
The same requirements hold true for the indefinite
article: its allomorphs, a [ ] and an [ n], are each used
depending on the initial sound of the noun they determine:
the former for nouns beginning with a consonant and the
latter for nouns beginning with a vowel: a train, an egg.
The emphatic pronunciation of the indefinite article is [ei]:
She is a child, not a grown-up.
24
2.2.4. Functions
The article adds the necessary information
regarding the reference of the noun it determines; from
the very beginning it should be useful to point out the
distinction between functions proper, which can be
explained conceptually and account for a whole class of
situations reflecting a logical pattern, and uses, which
sometimes cannot be given a logical explanation, being
merely the result of the tendencies in use throughout the
time. Of course, technically, functions are the reflection of
the general use but they appeared as the result of an
abstract process of categorizing uses.
As far as the functions of the article are concerned,
the oppositions to be expressed by articles are between
specific8 (reference is made to one element) and non-
specific/generic reference. Specific reference can be
viewed as including the reference to a known or to an
unknown element, whereas non-specific reference applies
to a class of elements, indirectly distinguishing it from
others.
Uses include typical structural patterns in which
there can still be traced a logical reason in choosing a
certain article and what the literature calls non-significant
reference, i.e. cases when nouns/phrases contain a
certain article without linking that to any functional value.
8
Quirk et al., 1985: 265
25
Specific reference can be subdivided into
[+definite] and [-definite]; the first type refers to those
cases when reference is made to a known element: most
languages which have the category of article will use the
definite article for that function; it is its basic function:
The street that you were looking for does not exist.
The meal was delicious!
Specific definite reference of the article is
designated by two terms taken from Greek anaphoric
function (ana before and pherein to carry) or cataphoric
function (cata after and pherein to carry). In other
words, the simple use of the article can be further
subdivided according to the type of context which gives it
to be understood that the element under discussion is
known. Quirk (1985: 266) uses the syntagm the
recovering of the referent identity by the speaker and,
implicitly (though exceptions may appear), by the
interlocutor to designate the process underlying this
function of the definite article.
The recovering of the referent identity can be
achieved by means of:
1. the linguistic context, in which case we are dealing
either with an anaphora or a cataphora;
The anaphora can be a direct anaphora:
Ive bought a new book. The book is remarkable.
(The noun preceded by the definite article is the anaphora
which sends back to an antecedent; the antecedent and
26
the anaphora are co-referential, they refer to the same
item.)
or an indirect anaphora, functioning as in the
previous case but implying shared general knowledge:
I bought a book and one of the pages was torn.9
Indefinite article can also have indirect anaphoric
function depending on the shared knowledge:
They love each other. I dont believe in such a
sudden love.
The cataphora presupposes the use of the noun
determined by a definite article before mentioning its area
of reference, i.e. its definite character. The article does
not resume a previous referent, it anticipates it. The
definite character of the noun can be given by an attribute
or an attributive clause:
9
Quirk et al. (1985: 267) used a similar example and explained the necessity
of the interlocutors sharing the basic general knowledge linked to the
context. We should add that between the antecedent and the anaphora there
is a relation of inclusion. ( a book has pages and, in Quirks example, a
bicycle has wheels). Quirk himself called shared knowledge a palpable
fiction, i.e. something which is hardly achievable in real life situations, but
this type of anaphora is, in our view, a reduced case of cataphoric reference
which is precisely due to the common understanding of the context by the
interlocutors: I bought a book and one of the pages (of the book) was torn.
27
Both countable and uncountable nouns can be preceded
by a definite article if they are followed by a postmodifier,
usually an of phrase10:
the butter of Holland; the philosophy of Greece;
2. the situational context determining a situational
reference linked to
a. the immediate situation (Quirk, 1985: 266), given the
setting, i.e. the time and place when the verbal exchange
takes place. This is the anaphoric situational function,
which implicitly means emphasizing the noun preceded by
the definite article, this leading to its being also called
deictic11 or demonstrative12 function. The system of
reference considered in the verbal exchange is relative
and depends on the perspective of the interlocutors.
Shared knowledge is a necessary condition, otherwise
misunderstandings can appear:
The roses are very beautiful! (uttered in a garden,
shared general knowledge)
Has the man come? What man? (misjudged
shared knowledge, asking for a clarification) vs Yes, he
has. (shared general knowledge)
Examples such as Mind the step! or Beware of the
dog! are given by Quirk et al. (1985: 266) as
10
Prlog (1995: 45) considers that the article has a limited generic reference.
11
Gleanu-Frnoag & Comiel, 1993: 102-103
12
The demonstrative meaning of the definite article is explained
etymologically by its origin; it evolved from the demonstrative pronoun.
Prlog (1995: 44) talks about the overlapping of the demonstrative and
anaphoric functions in set phrases of the type under the circumstances,
nothing of the kind etc.
28
counterexamples regarding the theory of shared general
knowledge. They can be seen as elliptical cataphoric
structures: Beware of the dog [in this yard]!
When preceding nouns denoting body parts, the
definite article can be considered as having deictic value
since it replaces a possessive adjective; sometimes
parallel structures exist:
She was pulled by the hair. (the = her)
I shook him by the hand. I shook his hand.
Variants like
I shook him by his hand.
are acceptable but not idiomatic. (Quirk, 1985: 270-271)
29
b. a larger situation, when the setting is irrelevant and
the general knowledge prevails; they can be contrasted
with common nouns with unique reference within the
system of reference considered by the speaker. The latter
include the semantic domain of celestial bodies and of
institutions (moon, star, earth, sky, sea, cosmos, Church,
etc). Phrases referring to classes, groups of human
beings clans, tribes, races, etc- can be included into the
category of nouns preceded by the:
31
The epiphoric function can combine with the numeric
function. The latter is accounted for by the origin of the
indefinite article which was initially an adjective with
numeric value. The numeric function becomes prevalent
when the article is contrasted with other numerals:
32
The zero article has also a numeric function only
that the number or quantity implied is indefinite; in this
case the zero article has the meaning of the indefinite
adjective some which can replace it; there are linguists
who consider some (always stressed and reduced in
pronunciation when having this value) a type of article
which refers to a certain kind of referent in this case, a
contrast is explicit:
33
omitted and taken to be understood in the context).
Compare:
He is a doctor. vs He is president./ She is the
secretary [of our university].
13
See Quirks larger anaphoric situational function of the definite article.
34
substantivised adjectives (denoting nationality names- the
Swiss/ Dutch/ Israelis/ Chinese-, classes of people- the
poor/ young/ diseased/ unemployed- abstractions- the
good/ evil/ future- musical instruments- to play the violin/
piano-) or substantivised numerals: the Big Five.
The indefinite article with generic function has the
role of assigning a person/object to a particular class/kind
and considering it in its most general sense (Prlog,
1995: 49). The author considers this function of the article
as a variety of the cataphoric function, since the operation
of including an item within a category is based on the
general competence of the speaker of a language, and
assuming the user has that competence, a condition of
belonging to that class is the feature expressed by the
verb phrase:
A horse is an animal.
*A wine is a drink.
35
Life is full of joys.
He hates music but loves long walks.
36
thinking can be deduced from that. It is what we called
uses as opposed to functions.
This type of article use is specific to nouns
pertaining to certain semantic fields; generally those
nouns are geographical names or designate institutions,
facilities, etc. The definite and the zero article can be used
in such cases, the choice of one or the other being purely
arbitrary.
Non-significant reference
THE Zero article ()
Names of countries and islands -
in the plural:
The Hebrides, The United
States.
37
Public institutions, facilities, etc Exc. Covent Garden, St. Johns
(hotels, restaurants, theatres, College, etc.
opera houses, museums,
libraries, etc): The Savoy, The
Ritz, The Metropolitan, The
British Museum.
Ships, trains, etc.: The Orient -
Express, The Queen Mary, etc
Newspapers: The Sun, The Exc. Magazines and some
Washington Post, The periodicals: Time, Punch,
Chronicle, etc. National Geographic, etc.
38
institutions; means of transportation; time of the day/night
abstractly speaking; seasons; illnesses; sciences,
languages. Some of the cases listed above were
comprised in the set phrases selected. Exceptions are
caused by the presence of some modifiers accompanying
the nouns under discussion:
39
The use of determiners such as ordinal numerals or
adjectives before the noun triggers the use of the definite
article14: the third chapter, the next /last page, etc.
II. Are the adjective little and the quantifier little related?
14
called by Quirk logical use of the definite article (1985: 270)
40
Ref. Specific reference
Non-
specific
Based on ling. Non-
Based on ling. /
context significant
context generic
reference
(anaphoric epiphoric numeric refer-
(anaphoric and ence
situational/deicti
cataphoric)
c function)
Article
type
Bibliography:
Budai, L. 1997. Gramatica englez. Teorie i exerciii.
Bucureti: Teora.
42
Celce-Murcia, M. & D. Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The
Grammar Book. An ESL/ EFL Teachers Course,
2nd edition. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Crystal, David. 21985. A Dictionary of Linguistics and
Phonetics, NY: Basil Blackwell
Gleanu-Frnoag, G. & E. Comiel. 1993. Gramatica
limbii engleze pentru uz colar. Bucureti:
Omegapres & RAI.
Ilovici, E. & M. Chioran, M. Ciofu. 1970. A Practical Guide
to English Grammar. Exerciii de gramatic.
Bucureti: Editura Didactic i Pedagogic.
Levichi, L. & I.Preda. 1992. Gramatica limbii engleze.
Bucureti: Editura Mondero.
Levichi, L. 1970. Limba englez contemporan.
Morfologie. Bucureti: Editura Didactic i
Pedagogic.
Nedelcu, C. 2004. English Grammar. Craiova:
Universitaria.
Prlog, H. 1995. The English Noun Phrase. Timioara:
Hestia Publishing House.
Quirk, R. & S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, J. Svartvik. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London & NY: Longman.
Thomson, A. J. & A.V. Martinet. 1997. A Practical English
Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
43
Chapter III
THE NOUN
3.1. Definition
3.2. Classification
3.2.1. The semantic criterion
3.2.2. The formal criterion
3.2.3. The structural criterion
3.3. Grammatical categories
3.3.1. The number of nouns
3.3.1.1. Count/ Individual nouns
3.3.1.2. Mass/Uncount/Invariable nouns
3.3.2. The gender of nouns
3.3.3. The case of nouns
3.4. Syntactic functions
Topics for discussion
3.1. Definition
Descriptive grammar defines the noun considering
the semantic criterion, therefore the definition is more or
less common to any natural language: a noun is a
variable/inflectional part of speech which denotes a
concrete or an abstract element.
45
3.2. Classification of nouns
The classification of nouns can be made according
to various criteria: the semantic criterion, the formal
criterion, having to do with the inflectional characteristics
of the noun, and the structural criterion.
3.2.1. According to the first criterion, nouns can be
common (designating classes of elements) and proper
nouns, designating a particular person, place, thing, etc.
The proper noun has an individualizing function by itself.
Of course individuals or places having the same name
can be grouped together, but it would be an illogical
criterion, since their common name is not enough to
justify their belonging to the same category:
I know three Marys. (it would be relevant to say
something like that only if the speaker requires some
clarification about the identity of the referent designated
by the proper name- Mary who? )
He lives in Athens. When did he move to
Greece? No, Athens, Texas. (the interlocutor will ask for
clarifications, if the place designated by the name is not
the one indicated by his encyclopedic knowledge)
46
book, man versus art, phonetics, ideal, beauty15, etc.
Proper names are mostly concrete, designating names of
persons- Jane, Richard Smith-, geographical names
Paris, Europe, the Danube-, institutions -Covent Garden,
the British Museum, etc. Some of them can be abstract
when they designate an abstraction or a fictional/mythical
character, place, etc: Heaven, Snow-White, Zeus, El-
Dorado.16
Internal conversion is the process by which
common nouns are turned into proper nouns and vice-
versa.
15
Many abstract nouns can be converted into concrete nouns when they refer
to the feature of an individual: She is a beauty.
16
Budai (1997: 260) discusses the logical categories of nouns considering
the feature [+concrete] as the superordinate term which subsumes
[+common] and [+proper] nouns; in their turn, common nouns can be class-
nouns (countable) and material nouns; class nouns can be either individual
or collective.
47
bearer of the name is implicitly associated to the name
itself; thus, the name can be used by any referent who
has/claims to have that feature. The use of the proper
name as a common noun depends on the general
knowledge of the interlocutors:
He thinks he is a Shakespeare.17
Dont behave like a Shylock!
She is not exactly a Venus!
In other cases, the internal conversion is actually a
metonymy: for instance the authors name is used instead
of the work, as in
Its not a Picasso, its just a cheap fake.
Internal conversion justifies forms such as china, jersey,
brussels, etc., to designate a product which originated in
the area whose name it took over.
Any common noun can become a proper name if
there is a reason behind that choice; for instance,
common nouns denoting professions came to become
surnames since whole tribes/families were working in that
domain. That is why this phenomenon is characteristic to
many languages, not just English:
17
The indefinite article is the formal marker of the change undergone by the
proper name become common noun.
48
Dr. Shepard is new in town. (Shepard <
shepherd, a change of spelling occurs)
A particular case when a common noun is similar
to a proper name is when one refers to his/her own
parents and the initial capital letter denotes the
individualization odf the noun, acquiring the value of a
possessive adjective:
I spoke to Father (= our father).
49
words take on new meanings, as in changing from mass to
count nouns, the new meanings take on a life of their own,
there is nothing contradictory about an iron [of either sort]
made from aluminium. (Noonan, 2005: 33)
3. 3. Grammatical categories
The grammatical categories specific to nouns are:
number, gender, case and determination20. Since English
18
Here one can include nouns obtained from any other parts of speech,
which are simple words themselves: ups and downs of life, no buts, the
poor, etc.
19
Budai, 1997: 257.
50
is an analytical language, the formal marker of number
can also implicitly indicate gender (by the simple absence
of a particular gender marker) and case (usually indicated
by word order):
The actors/ the actresses were applauded for
[+plural] [+Nominative] [+/-masculine]
minutes in a row.
20
The noun has the property of being determined, that is of receiving an
article meant to indicate its area of reference. The role of articles has already
been discussed.
51
a. hiss, choice21; watch, touch; charge; box; buzz;
b. tomato, potato versus kilo; cuckoo, bamboo; soprano;
nouns such as ghetto, motto, volcano, cargo can get
either s or es;
c. country versus toy, play;
If nouns ending in o or y have their final sound
preceded by a consonant, they add es in the plural (y >
i).
d. nouns ending in th and f/fe are considered either
cases of nouns with regular plural or with irregular
plural22:
bath, mouth, path, youth versus birth, breath, myth,
length, growth, faith;23
calf, elf, half, knife, leaf, life, loaf, self, thief, wife, wolf vs
dwarf, roof, chief, belief, gulf, grief, etc; the nouns scarf,
handkerchief, hoof, wharf, turf, staff have double forms.
Compound nouns can be included within the class
of nouns with a regular plural, taking into account their
form. The plural suffix is added according to their
structure: if they have a noun in their structure and it is the
head word, then it is marked for plural; if there is no noun
within the compound, then the last element is marked for
plural; if one of the components is man or woman,
functioning as gender markers, and they are placed in
21
house has the plural houses.
22
Gleanu-Frnoag, 1993: 75-76.
23
Earth, oath, truth can have double forms in point of pronunciation.
52
initial position within the compound, then both elements of
the compound are marked for plural:
-classroom/s, horse race/s; looker/s-on, mother/s-in-law;
-forget-me-not/s, merry-go-round/s;
- man-servant vs men-servants, woman-doctor vs
women-doctors.
With foreign compounds the form of plural oscillates:
court-martial courts-martial/ court-martials (American
English); attorney-general attorneys-general/ attorney-
generals. Compounds denoting names of officials add the
s to both words: Lords Justices, Lords Commissioners of
the Treasury, Knights-Templars.
Clearly, British English has in view the semantics of the
noun, whereas American English, the form.
Letters, substantivised numerals and abbreviations
mark the plural by s preceded by an apostrophe, though
the tendency is to mark the plural without the apostrophe:
in the 1980s/1980s, MPs/MPs but dot your is and cross
your ts.
53
Anglo-Saxon nouns are further subdivided into
three categories:
-nouns ending in f/-fe and th which have regular plurals;
they have been discussed under regular nouns;
-nouns with irregular plural marked by the grammatical
suffix en; it used to be the regular plural marker in Old
English but now only three nouns still form the plural by
adding this suffix: ox-oxen, child-children; brother-
brethren24;
-irregular plurals formed by root change; this means a
vocalic alternation within the root: the variants of vocalic
alternation are: a/e; oo/ee; ou/i:
man-men; woman-women [wimin]
tooth-teeth; foot-feet; goose-geese;
mouse-mice; louse-lice.
Foreign plurals regard regular plurals in the source
languages from which English has borrowed a
series of nouns. Loan words come from Latin,
Greek, French, Italian and Hebrew.
-Latin borrowings have the following singular and plural
markers: -us/-i; -a/-ae; -um/-a; -ex,-ix/-ices.
locus-loci; magus-magi; opus-opera; stimulus-
stimuli
alga-algae; larva-larvae;
codex-codices; apex-apices/apexes; index-
indexes/indices; appendix-appendices/appendixes.
24
The regular plural brothers is generally used unless reference is made to
members of a religious order, etc.
54
The following nouns have double forms for plural, i.e. the
Latin plural and the regular plural:
cactus, calculus, focus, fungus, nucleus, syllabus;
antenna, formula;
aquarium, agendum, medium, ultimatum,
symposium;
55
-Italian borrowings have the following specific number
markers oppositions: -o; -e/-i; in many cases, there has
been developed a regular plural form in s.
bambino-bambini; libretto-libretti; tempo-tempi;
graffito-graffitti;
dilettante-dilettanti;
-Hebrew plurals are also doubled by regular plurals:
seraph- seraphim/seraphs
cherub-cherubim/cherubs a beautiful or innocent
child
25
Fish and fruit can have regular plurals if various kinds/species are implied.
26
Carp, deer, trout can have regular plurals, rarely used.
56
partitives27. Partitives are the main means of quantifying
mass nouns, but some are used with count nouns: a
pound of nails, a ton of bricks, a box of cherries, etc.
The fact that some nouns are plural in form while
others are singular does not influence their common
feature of having a plural meaning. Those grammarians
who treat such nouns as uncountable consider their
meaning as prevailing and, technically speaking, it is not
the form of these nouns which is changed to express the
singular.
This class includes:
- summation plurals, i.e. nouns which are plural in form
and take a plural verb, while denoting elements made up
of two identical parts: they designtae either instruments
(scissors, pliers, tongs, pincers, scales, compasses,
binoculars, spectacles, glasses, etc) or clothing articles
(breeches, pyjamas, pants, shorts, trousers, flannels,
jeans, overalls, etc):
The pliers are not here, fetch me a pair of tongs
from the car.
On a scale from 1 to 10, how would you grade
your scales? Should I buy a similar pair?
27
Partitives are countable nouns which lose most of their lexical meaning
and become functional words in order to mark the number of uncountable
nouns; they act as quantifiers. Some partitives are general (piece, item, bit,
etc), other are specific (cake, word, loaf, bar, sheet, etc): a piece of
paper/wood/advice vs a shred of evidence; a drop of water; a blade of grass,
a flight of stairs, a wedge of cake, hunks of bread, a stack of money/work, a
round of ammunition/applause, a clove of garlic, a set of tennis, etc.
57
If you are a true navigator, then you dont rely only
on your compass, you should be able to calculate your
position on the map and you need a pair of compasses.
28
Some of these nouns can be preceded by partitives: a flight of stairs.
58
The homework does not include exercises with
nouns.
Our steady progress has been appreciated.
I didnt like the furniture: I wouldnt buy a single
article of furniture from that store.
29
Defective individual nouns are included in this category by some linguists.
30
Nouns such as chocolate, cheese, wine, steel, etc can be used in the plural
if various kinds of materials/substances, etc are implied. Chocolates means
chocolate bonbons.
59
Measles is/are a catching disease.
Collective nouns
- proper: family, crew, team, crowd, committee,
government, council,32army33 etc; they can agree with the
31
But the short form is used with the definite article: to have the flu.
32
It is essential to understand that the discussion about their collective or
non-collective interpretation regards them only if they are in the singular;
60
verb in the plural if the focus is on the multitude of
members or with the verb in the singular if they are seen
as denoting a unit:
such nouns are countable and have regular plurals, but that situation is of no
concern in point of the agreement with the verb.
33
Army tends to be rather used with a plural verb in British English whereas
American English generally favours the agreement with a verb in the
singular.
34
In examples such as He is good people the collective noun people has
acquired the value of the countable noun person. It is very interesting that a
collective noun is used to refer to an individual. The meaning of the sentence
He is good, which could be apparently considered as a synonym of He is
good people, is different. The latter sentence would be interpreted as
referring to some particular quality, ability, competence, etc, and not to
somebodys character.
61
The police have followed the thieves.
The youth are coming to visit the new exhibition.
-individual nouns of multitude are nouns which get the
zero morph in the plural, being thus invariable nouns; they
can be considered countable nouns with irregular plural.
Semantically, they cover both concrete and abstract
nouns. In point of form, some look like singular nouns,
some like plural nouns: sheep, deer, fish, trout, eel, carp,
etc vs headquarters, means, series, etc.
62
another is of no consequence regarding the change of the
noun form: no agreement noun-adjective or nounverb (in
case of compound forms containing a past participle)
follows as a result of the noun belonging to a certain
gender; this is what makes Quirk (1985: 314) consider
that is is a covert or notional gender as opposed to
grammatical or overt gender.
The new boy/girl/letter is here.
In this light, the definition of gender in Quirks view (1985:
314) appears as the logical consequence of the specific
character of gender in English:
63
Cartea frumoas este pus pe mas.
Nevertheless, even English went through periods when
both criteria (meaning and form) established the gender of
nouns, though the latter prevailed in all Indo-European
languages as far as gender is concerned: most animate
nouns designating female referents were feminine and
most nouns designating male referents were masculine.
In Old English, some nouns denoting an inanimate
referent were masculine or feminine, not neuter: stn
stone, mna moon were masculine and sunne sun was
feminine as in German; on the other hand, nouns
denoting a feminine referent were of masculine gender
according to the form of the noun: wfman woman was
masculine because the second element of the compound,
man, was masculine.
A distinct category of nouns is represented by
dual35/common gender nouns: they denote names of
professions, functions, roles, etc, which can be
performed/held, etc by both male and female referents:
worker, writer, student, pupil, shop-assistant, professor,
governor, president, lawyer, doctor, parent, child, spouse,
monarch, novelist, inhabitant, fellow-traveller etc. In such
cases, the sex of the referent is irrelevant, it is the quality
35
R. Quirk distinguishes between dual personal gender and common gender,
the latter being intermediate between personal and nonpersonal: child,
substituted by she/he/it, depending on the context, and also names of animals
are included into this category (1985: 315-316). Levichi & Preda (1992:
26), among others, overlap the meanings of the two terms.
64
expressed which matters; if necessary, gender can be
explicitly marked:
The teacher talked to the students.
The woman-teacher talked to male and female
students.
She has ten girl-cousins and no boy/male-
cousin.
The units being in a paradigmatic relationship are
either in opposition or in free variation36: -s and es are in
free variation with nouns such as cargo, handkerchief,
etc; - s/-es and ae/-a/-i are in free variation with formula,
medium, fungus, etc.
Of the two opposed/contrasting units, one is
neutral/unmarked and the other is positive or marked.
Initially, this was equivalent to the presence and absence
of a formal marker respectively: elev elevi; student
students. In time, the opposition became more abstract
and was no longer restricted to two contrasting formal
markers. The unmarked form is more general in meaning
and its distribution is not so limited as that of the marked
element of the pair.37 For instance, considering the sex
opposition and following Lyons example, horse is
unmarked and mare marked, for gender. Hence, the
similar use of the two words in English and Romanian
should not be surprising:
36
If in free variation, two units can substitute each other in any context
without a change of meaning.
37
J.Lyons, (1968: 96).
65
What a beautiful horse you have! Is it a stallion or
a mare?
Ce cal frumos avei! E armsar sau iap?
On the other hand, horse can be interpreted strictly in
opposition to the marked form mare and thus it becomes
marked, having the feature [+male] and being
synonymous to stallion. Then, the above sentence
becomes:
What a beautiful specimen you have! Is it a horse
or a mare?
Ce exemplar frumos avei! E cal sau iap?
Some nouns implicitly marked for gender came to be
used as common gender nouns but acquired a negative
connotation: sissy designating an effeminate and thus
implicitly coward man, tomboy being the opposite of sissy,
designating a female referent behaving like a boy:
You are a sissy, you dont dare to react like a true
man.
There is nothing feminine in her behaviour, she is
such a tomboy.
Man can be used as an unmarked term referring to both
sexes, in the same way people implies both men and
women:
Man is mortal.
There were many people in the public square.
Nouns such as man, guy, brother, used as
addresssing terms or as terms expressing an emotional
reaction of the speaker, can refer to both male and female
66
referents; sis(ter) can be used as an addressing term
even if the speaker and the hearer are not siblings, to
emphasize the idea of solidarity:
Hello, guys, how are you today? (addressed to
female interlocutors)
Oh, brother, leave me alone! (addressed to a
female interlocutor)
Man, give me a break! (idem)
Many nouns to be used for female referents have
negative connotation - bag, prude (mironosi), shrew
(scorpie), coquette, slut, harlot, strumpet, whore, broad -
or belong to the colloquial register; some can become
terms of addressing or even terms of endearment: doll,
siren, mermaid, cookie, peach:
Can I help you, doll? Pot s te ajut, drag?
How is daddys peach? (a father-daughter
discussion)
You finished the research for my paper. You are a
peach. Ai terminat documentarea pentru lucrarea mea.
Eti o scump.
38
These are cases of lexically marked gender.
67
spinster39, gentleman-lady, nephew-niece, sir-madam,
tutor-governess, wizard-witch, etc;
39
As in many other similar cases, the feminine has a negative connotation,
whereas the masculine is neutral, if not implicitly positive in point of
connotation; the connotative opposition expressed by the two words reflects
the extra-linguistic reality.
68
bull-frog cow-frog
bull-camel cow-camel
40
As a vulgar , offending term it is always spelled jackass, which illustrates
the evolution of the proper name from a lexical word to a grammatical word.
41
These are cases of grammatically marked gender.
42
-ette can also be a diminutive suffix as in kitchenette.
43
The omission of the last syllable of the masculine word may occur when
forming the feminine; the process is called back-clipping; it happens with
nouns such as tiger-tigress, traitor-traitress, benefactor-benefactress,
ambassador-ambassadress.
44
In many contexts, the feminine has acquired a negative connotation, since
it covers a wide semantic area of reference.
45
Dudette is used in spoken English as the feminine of the addressing term
dude, which can be considered a synonym of guy.
69
To avoid sexual bias in language, considering that
many feminine terms have acquired a negative
connotation and this has led to a somehow exaggerated
suspicion of alleged discrimination, dual gender nouns
have been preferred or even created, whenever the sex of
the referent was irrelevant. Quirk (1985: 315) enumerates
some cases:
supervisor instead of foreman
firefighter instead of fireman
chair(person)46 instead of chairman
spokesperson instead of spokesman
fisher instead of fisherman
mail carrier instead of mailman
usher instead of usherette
homemaker instead of housewife
Member of Congress instead of Congressman
flight attendant instead of airline hostess
46
Chair takes over the meaning of the head word person, thus the compound
being reduced to the first element. Its meaning becomes evident only in the
context. Chair for chairperson iis a case of metonymy.
70
The masculine noun is also marked in the case of
the noun bridegroom formed by adding a lexical element
to the feminine unmarked noun bride. The interesting
aspect is that groom evolved from a gender marker with
no lexical meaning in the compound to the status of head
word and the first element of the compound (bride) is now
implicit and no longer expressed; thus, the opposition
bridegroom-bride becomes nowadays groom-bride, being
another case of lexically marked gender with nouns.
Gender can be changed for stylistic reasons: if an
inanimate noun becomes animate the process involved is
personification; the opposite phenomenon is reification:
Sea, she has always fascinated people.
John is here? I dont want to see it here.
Elements linked to the feminine principle, associated to
[+attachment] and [+fertility], but also negative passions
and feelings, abstractions, names of arts, famous
universities, countries (as economic and political units),
vehicles are also by tradition feminine: hope, faith, justice,
devotion, charity; jealousy, pride, ambition; liberty, peace;
earth, moon, nature, sea, life, spring, morning, evening,
night, darkness; art, philosophy, science; Oxford
University; Romania, France; ship, car, bus, engine,
motor,etc.
I have hope and she keeps me alive.
Can you see the moon? Her mysterious light is
beautiful tonight.
71
France is our traditional partner and her exports to
Romania increased.
It is obvious that in all the cases mentioned above there is
an affective connotation implied by the user; this
connotation is determined by subjective attitudes or by
objective reasons, as it happens in the case of vehicles,
mostly used by men, at least in the past; spending a lot of
time on a ship, for instance, and having your life depend
on it might lead to the need of gaining its benevolence
and influencing its changeable nature; from this to its
being assimilated to a feminine entity there was just one
step.
Nouns denoting violent natural phenomena and
passions - anger, fury, terror, despair, love, crime,
murder, war; wind, thunder, storm, sun, time, sleep,
death, the grave -, rivers and oceans, mountains, etc, are
masculine:
The sun rose and his brilliance made everyhting
shine.
War and his consequences were unpredictable.
A special case of personification is considered the
treatment of some animals like pets, hence their reference
by the pronouns he or she and not it. In the table
presented above, common nouns are designating
referents resumed by it, whereas the use of gender-
marked nouns implies a certain concern for the referent
resumed by he/she.
72
Large animals were generally considered as either
masculine or feminine, small animals not being
associated with the idea of gender. Nevertheless, Quirk
(1985: 317) speaks about higher and lower animals, in
terms of their close connection to man; in fact, there is no
objective criterion which to determine the association of
an animal with a certain sex, but only subjective criteria
having to do with interest or even affection:
73
syntactic function corresponding to it, thus resulting not
two cases, as in the previous classification, but three: the
Nominative, the Possessive and the Objective Case. The
two perspectives made Levichi & Preda (1992: 27)
oscillate regarding the number of cases in English:
47
There is no Vocative Case, it is called the Nominative of Address.
74
at the Deep Structure level of the Noun Phrase). It
answers the questions: whose? Of what/of which?
Which?
48
Levichi & Preda (1992: 29), consider that calling the Synthetic Genitive
Saxon Genitive is wrong; putting the sign of equality between them seems
reasonable for many linguists, considering that in Old English possessive
case was generally marked by the suffix s, which is thus interpreted as a
Saxon feature. The two authors do not agree with the synonymy between
Prepositional and French Genitive either; the latter name is determined by
the association of the generalised use of this type of Genitive to the Norman
French influence after 1066.
49
According to Noonan (2005: 66).
75
Some set phrases contain a synthetic Genitive: to
ones hearts content; a hairs breadth escape, etc. Some
idioms, for instance, of the type for ... sake have both the
variant with the synthetic genitive (marked by the
apostrophe, i.e. the zero genitive, if the noun in the
genitive ends in -s) and that with the prepositional
genitive: for the consciencesake/ for the sake of your
conscience; for Gods sake/ for the sake of God.
Quirk (1985: 320) talks about the Zero Genitive
meanig the marking of the Genitive only by an apostrophe
to avoid repetitive or awkward combinations of sounds.
This is true for nouns ending in s (pronounced [s] or [z]),
be they common nouns in the plural or proper names of
Greek or English origin. Both pronunciation and spelling
oscillate but most commonly the spelling means just using
the apostrophe and the pronunciation is [iz]:
Socrates philosophy ['sokr ti,siz]
Dickens novels ['dikin,siz]
- the Analytical/Prepositional Genitive/ Periphrastic
Associative Case50 is marked by the preposition of, hence
its name. It has no restrictions, though proper names are
not usually used with this type of Genitive, unless
emphasis is placed on it:
Johns house versus ?the house of John
Its Johns house, Im sure of it.
She will never enter any house of John.
50
According to Noonan (2005: 66).
76
- the Double Genitive/Post-Genitive51/ Combined
Associative52 implying a double marking of the case, both
by the suffix and by the preposition; semantically, in some
cases there is a difference between the simple Genitive
and the double one, in other cases, the choice of the
double Genitive is just a question of emphasis:
This is a picture of my brother. (representing him). This
is a picture of my brothers. (it belongs to him.)
It is that students decision. It is a decision of that
student. It is a decision of that students. (the three
variants express an ever increasing emphasis on the
attribute)
- the Implicit Genitive appeared out of the necessity for
concision and is not formally marked, hence its name; the
noun in the Genitive functioning as a determiner of the
head noun is placed before it and only its position and
function give it to be understood that it is a Genitive:
The room windows = the windows of the room
World economy = the economy of the world/the worlds
economy
51
Quirk, 1985: 330.
52
According to Noonan (2005: 67).
77
-Possessive Genitive, implying ownership proper: my
friends son; Johns car;
53
Quirk gives these examples though they might seem ambiguous in point of
interpretation (1985: 322).
78
-Gradation Genitive, which has the stylistic value of a
superlative: the king of kings, the fool of fools, etc. Such a
structure is not specific only to English, since it combines
concision and plasticity: frumoasa frumoaselor, etc;
54
The examples are taken from Quirk (1985: 322) and, at least for the first
example, might partly overlap the uses of the descriptive genitive, in our
view.
79
The writers Descriptive the life of the Additional
life Genitive writer emphasis
John and Possessive the car of John Additional
Pauls car55 Group and Paul emphasis
Genitive
Queen Subjective the reign of Additional
Elisabeths Genitive Queen emphasis
reign Elisabeth
81
interpretation and translation into Romanian of such a
succession of synthetic gentitives should be done from
right to left)
82
It was a wonderful example of kindness to all the
people present.
83
It is unmarked formally and, by consequence,
identifiable only by means of word order and prepositions,
if it is preceded by them:
84
condition is for the noun/Cognate Object to be preceded
by an adjective; the focus is actually on that adjective, it is
the purpose of creating an apparently tautological
construction57: to cry bitter tears, to live a wonderful life, to
dream the impossible dream, etc.
57
They dont necessarily look and sound tautological when the verb and the
noun collocating are related semantically but not etymologically; this is true
for both English and Romanian: to sleep a good sleep a dormi un somn
bun.
85
syntax; identifying the case of a noun can generally
implicitly mean determining its function and viceversa.
86
Will a deck of these cards do? (Celce-Murcia &Larsen-
Freeman, 1999: 340)
87
or other quality of an object that head would be an
appropriate measure noun for that object, and
therefore head is a special measure noun that must
be memorised along with the word it is used to
measure.
88
IV. Form the plural and discuss the differences in
meaning. Provide examples:
art, wage, sand, spade, respect, spectacle, work, earning,
ice, air, custom, water, fruit, spirit, brother, staff, index,
genius, cloth, color, manner, pain, ground, compass,
people, copper, iron, paper, film, nickel.
Bibliography:
89
Celce-Murcia, M. & D. Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The
Grammar Book. An ESL/ EFL Teachers Course,
2-nd edition. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Crystal, David. 21985. A Dictionary of Linguistics and
Phonetics, NY: Basil Blackwell.
Gleanu-Frnoag, G. & E.Comiel. 1993. Gramatica
limbii engleze pentru uz colar. Bucureti:
Omegapres & RAI.
Ilovici, E. & M. Chioran, M. Ciofu. 1970. A Practical Guide
to English Grammar. Exerciii de gramatic.
Bucureti: Editura Didactic i Pedagogic.
Levichi, L. 1970. Limba englez contemporan.
Morfologie. Bucureti: Editura Didactic i
Pedagogic.
Levichi, L. & I.Preda. 1992. Gramatica limbii engleze.
Bucureti: Editura Mondero.
Lyons, J. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Murar, I. 2010. A History of the English Language.
Craiova: Editura Universitaria.
Nedelcu, C. 2004. English Grammar. Craiova:
Universitaria.
Noonan, M. 2005. A Course in English Grammar, volume
1, English 403: Modern English Grammar, version
9/05, typography by Deborah I. Mulvaney.
http://www.coursehero.com/file/1257173/CEGV1/
Prlog, H. 1995. The English Noun Phrase. Timioara:
Hestia Publishing House.
90
Quirk, R. & S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, J. Svartvik. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London & NY: Longman.
Thomson, A. J. & A.V. Martinet. 1997. A Practical English
Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
91
Chapter IV
THE ADJECTIVE
4.1. Definition
4.2. Classification
4.2.1. Classification in point of form
4.2.2. Classification in point of meaning
4.2.3. Classification in point of function
4.2.4. Classification in point of position
4.3. Characteristics
4.4. Grammatical categories
4.5. Miscellanea
4.5.1. Morpho-semantic aspects
4.5.2. Morpho-syntactic aspects
4.5.2.1. Supplementive adjective clauses
4.5.2.2. Degree complements
4.5.3. Pragmatic aspects
Topics for discussion
93
referent, abstraction, etc, denoted by a noun. Also, the
word quality designates a characteristic, be it interpreted
from the perspective of the speaking-subject or not, or
connoted positively or negatively, which might entirely rely
on the contextual circumstances.
4.2. Classification
Four criteria can be taken into account when
classifying adjectives: form, meaning, function and
position; however, it mustnt be overlooked that the
criteria are interrelated: for instance, the function
conditions the position and vice-versa an attribute is
typically placed before the noun, whereas a predicative
follows the link verb; at the same time, the form of the
adjective, in point of its inflection is the direct
consequence of its semantic typology a qualitative
adjective is generally invariable, whereas a determinative
adjective may vary in point of inflection, for instance
according to the category of number.
4.2.1. In point of form two aspects are to be
discussed: the structure of the adjective in the positive
degree and its inflection.
According to its structure an adjective can be:
- simple, when its structure contains just the root: thin, fat,
cold, good, etc;
- a derivative, when the root is followed by a suffix:
analyzable, credible, cultural, atomic, childish, attractive,
beautiful, helpless, dangerous, dirty, etc;
94
- a compound, the structure containing two roots: dark-
green, clear-cut, etc;
- a para-synthetic word, formed both by derivation and
compounding: blue-eyed, hard-working, ever-lasting, etc.
Adjectives obtained by conversion from nouns are
of no concern to us at this stage, since they acquire the
value of an adjective functionally, but they remain nouns
in point of their structure and inflection: garden party,
economy control, school uniform, etc. Nouns such as
intellectual, fun, oral(s) illustrate full conversion, as in The
party was fun, others, such as medical, physical (exam)
illustrate partial conversion (the head noun is still
necessary).
95
them cannot be gradable, they have no comparison
degrees:
superior - *more superior - *the most superior
dead - *more dead - *the most dead
infinite - *more infinite
96
- gradability: adjectives can be gradable and non-
gradable; most of them belong to the first category; this
aspect will be discussed at length when referring to the
comparison degrees, since the direct consequence of the
gradability of a characteristic is that the adjective denoting
it has comparison degrees; we give below two examples
of ungradable adjectives:
Sulphuric acid burns.
French wines are famous. vs You look very
French [= elegant, chic]. (figurative meaning)
This is a dish of the Romanian cuisine. vs I am
more Romanian [= patriotic] than you. (figurative
meaning)
58
Not in the example They were late for the results.
97
stative gradable inherent example
- + + good man
+ + + old house
+ + - old friend
+ - + Romanian
industry
98
-demonstrative adjectives: such, same, this, that, etc
the same mistake;
- possessive adjectives: his matter;
- interrogative and relative adjectives: what, which, whose
- what books do you read? Tell me what to do.
- exclamatory adjectives: what (a); such (a) What a
house!
-adverbial adjective: a fast car;
-numeral: three books, the second show;
-indefinite: several, few, every, each, both every
garden, few friends, etc;
-negative: no, neither, not a- no money, neither side of
the road, not a soul.
99
they can modify the referent denoted by the noun the
adjective is inherent:
My old friend = 1. [a longtime friend, old as a
friend reference modification]; 2. [an old person who is
also my friend referent modification].
That is why examples such as *The nonsense is
utter are incorrect, because the adjective can never
express an inherent feature, therefore it cannot express
referent modification.
100
- adverb related adjectives: past, former, true, late,
possible, etc former teacher, true story, big liar, great
writer, quick car;
-denominal adjectives (derived from nouns): medical
condition, social call, criminal law.
59
If preceded by an adverb, they can be used attributively: a fully asleep
baby; the totally ashamed doer, etc.
60
Criminal is considered a homomorph by Quirk (1985: 411), the same form
having two meanings for the attributive function of the adjective.
101
Talk to the criminal lawyer. (1. lawyer specialized
in criminal law; 2. a lawyer who committed a crime)
102
adjective proper ending in ing is mistaken for a participle:
calculating in She is calculating is the opposite of frank.
Noonan (2005: 173) also gives the example of calculating
in a calculating person opposed to a calculating machine
(o persoan calculat vs o main de calculat). The
same is true for alarming, etc in
103
-gerund as modifier: living room (room for every day
living), swimming pool, running shoes, etc.
As a conclusion, a pre-modifier is the reduction of a
Relative Attributive Clause. A present participle is
preferred for reasons of concision, but the subordinate is
favoured for emphasis:
104
- set phrases of Romance origin: ambassador
extraordinary, body politic, time immemorial, sum total,
heir apparent, notary public, Asia Minor, secretary
general, first person singular, honor due, etc.
Sometimes, the place of the adjective depends on
its meaning:
present company excluded the people present
at the party
involved sentence complicated in form the
personnel involved in the operation
due consideration cuvenitul respect the money
due
ill-fame a child ill with flu
4.3. Characteristics
-adjectives pre- (and sometimes post-) modify a noun,
functioning as attributes:
The secretary general accepted the proposal.
They need a modern new wooden bookcase.
-post modify a noun as subject or object complement:
He became sad.
We found his answer impolite.
-can take the adverb very as their own pre-modifier:
Its very late to call her now.
-have the category of comparison (with some exceptions):
You are as young as I remembered you.
105
4.4. The grammatical categories specific to
adjectives in Romance languages are number, gender,
case (borrowed in general from the noun they determine)
and comparison, which is a category shared by adjectives
and adverbs. It cannot be said that most adjectives in
English have the category of number and gender, since
they are invariable and there is no agreement between
them and the noun they accompany. Nevertheless,
Levichi (1970: 76) considers that English adjectives have
case, even if, we should add, it is not explicitly marked,
unless were talking about adjectives which were originally
pronouns:
tall boys vs those boys
beautiful forests vs their dreams
smart girl vs whose girl
107
They are inferior to out competitors. (not *more
inferior)
The supreme value is represented by their
freedom of speech. (not *the most supreme)
This is a minor mistake, dont worry. (not *less
minor than others)
-other adjectives, of various origins, which imply a certain
degree of comparison or are incompatible with that: equal,
right, splendid, square, oral, main, dead:
*He is less dead than yesterday. (unless the speaker
uses the adjective ungrammatically to express irony)
*You two look more married now.
108
As in Romanian and in most languages, there are
three degrees of comparison:
- the positive degree, the basic form of the adjective: red,
interesting, foolish, hard-working, dark-green, etc;
- the comparative degree, implying the comparison of
some referents possessing a quality in different degrees;
there are three types of comparative: the comparative of
superiority (the focus is on the referent possessing a
quality to a higher degree than another/others, e.g. better
than, more important than, bigger than); comparative of
equality (the quality characterizes the referents to the
same degree, e.g. as big/late/stupid as); comparative of
inferiority (the focus is on the referent possessing a
quality to a lower degree than another/others, e.g. less
big/tired/important than);
- the superlative, subdivided into relative superlative
(implying a term of comparison, an element/a system of
reference, e.g. the most important, the biggest, the best)
and absolute superlative (implying a maximal degree in
possessing a quality, e.g. very nice, awfully kind, terribly
late, etc).
The means of marking the category of comparison
are either synthetic or analytical. Synthetic comparison
degrees are marked by grammatical suffixes: -er for the
comparative of superiority and est for the relative
109
superlative. This is true for monosyllabic adjectives and
disyllabic adjectives ending in y, -er,61 -ow, -le, -some:
big- bigger the biggest; clear- clearer- the
clearest;62
easy easier- the easiest63; clever cleverer the
cleverest; narrow- narrower the narrowest; able abler
the ablest64; handsome handsomer the
handsomest65.
Budai (1997: 376) mentions that disyllabic end-
stressed adjectives form comparison degrees
synthetically and gives the following examples: polite,
sincere, complete, profound, obscure, remote, severe,
concise, pleasant, stupid. It should be stated that
nowadays many of the above adjectives have analytical
comparison degrees. The same author enumerates the
adjectives stressed in their final syllable and ending in two
plosives exact, correct, distinct, abrupt, etc as
exceptions from the class of synthetic comparison
adjectives. (Budai, 1997: 377)
61
Adjectives such as proper, eager, etc, form degrees of comparison
analytically.
62
In spoken English one can hear forms such as much more quiet instead of
much quieter. Some would consider this former variant as more natural. An
example is given by Solomon (1994: 17) and quoted by Celce-Murcia (1999:
748): Its one of the most grand sights in New York City.
63
But corny more corny the most corny.
64
The adjective noble, though ending in le, has both synthetic and
analytical forms for comparative and superlative: more noble, the most
noble; the same is true for the disyllabic adjectives fertile, gentile, etc. In
point of spelling the final e of the base is dropped.
65
Handsome, troublesome, etc, have double forms for comparison degrees.
The same is true for common.
110
A series of monosyllabic nouns have irregular
comparison. Many of them form antonymic pairs:
good better the best
bad/ill worse the worst
73
Prlog , 1995: 83.
112
ending in y change the y into i before er /-est: early
earlier the earliest.74
The reasons for the appearance, preservation and
frequency of both synthetic and analytical forms are
indirectly suggested by Evans &Evans (1957: 105),
though other linguists have favoured the analytical
means, which is proven by contemporary tendencies in
use:
74
Sly (viclean)- slyer the slyest; shy (timid)-shyer- the shyest,
spry(sprinten, agil)-spryer- the spryest are exceptions. Wry (diform, pocit,
nesincer, denaturat) has double forms in point of spelling, either preserving
the y or changing it into -i-: wrier/wryer; the wryest/the wriest.
113
mentioned above and for plurisyllabic adjectives75,
including compound ones:
distinct -more distinct- the most distinct;
complete- more complete the most complete;
intense- more intense the most intense;
absurd- more absurd the most absurd; etc.
75
Adjectives with negative meaning (containing negative prefixes) can have
double forms: such examples are unfriendly, impolite, etc.
76
Prlog , 1995: 83.
114
4.5. Miscellanea
4.5.1. Morpho-semantic aspects
Evaluative
Color/ Origin
/ ag nou Gerun Head
size shape mater Part. /
descriptiv e n d noun
ial style
e adj.
wonderful small round old gold ruby ring
weddi
little silk French dress
ng
wither
incredible yellow rose
-ing
115
4.5.2. Morpho-syntactic aspects
4.5.2.1. Supplementive adjective clauses
116
Unhappy with the result, she returned to work.
117
- syntactically, it depends both on the predication and on
the subject;
- generally, it can be replaced by an adverb (which proves
its adverbial nature):
-if the adjective has its own constituents, the adjective can
determine a noun phrase which is not the subject:
118
If [they are] wet, dont place them on the floor.
120
They speak so much that we cannot sleep.
The city is so noisy that everybody is getting
crazy.
We have so much paperwork to do that well
never finish.
He has so few flaws that his friends envy him.
121
He is man enough to accept that he was wrong.
He is enough of a man to accept.
I have enough money/ money enough to pay for
it. Cf Rom. Am destui bani/bani destui.
122
She was prettier and more self-composed than her
sister.
When more has the meaning rather, it is placed before a
monosyllabic adjective such as pretty:
She was more pretty than beautiful.
Prlog (1995: 83) points out that, depending on
what the speaker/writer wants to stress, the comparison
degrees of an adjective can take synthetic or analytical
forms. More precisely, if the stress is on the adjective
itself and not on the degree to which an object possesses
that quality denoted by the adjective, any adjective can
get analytical comparison degree forms, as in the
example above:
She was more pretty than beautiful. She was
prettier (implicitly than another person) and clever. Cf
Rom. Era mai degrab drgu dect frumoas. vs Era
mai drgu (dect altcineva) i deteapt. (the second
adjective is in the positive degree of comparison)
123
The first class includes adjectives like fast, slow,
long, short77, hard, etc:
Drive slow(ly)! Buy cheap(ly)!
The examples chosen illustrate the double forms
for adverbs, marked and unmarked. Some examples
regard unstandard familiar English to pay sth. regular, to
play good, others standard English Speak clearer/more
clearly; its easier said than done; danger, go slow. Set
phrases should also be considered: to speak loud and
clear, to lose fair and square, to be brought up short and
sharp.
The second class includes adjectives ending in ly,
which leads to the avoidance of the corresponding
adverbs and their replacement by phrases containing the
adjectives: early, likely, monthly, friendly, kindly, kingly,
lively, manly, masterly:
He felt bad. he felt badly (=intensely)about it.
She looks good. She looks well (healthy).
The third class regards adjectives which are
predicative, begin with the prefix a- and have the feature
[+temporary state], homonymous with adverbs having the
features [+direction], [+follow motion verbs]:
Go abroad vs go around/ away
Ambiguities can appear in contexts such as He went [and
was] afraid. (Quirk, 1985: 408)
77
The forms shortly , hardly exist but a have a different meaning than their
counterparts , the unmarked adverbs: They work hard (=a lot) They hardly
work. Go slow! Slowly, they began to get along.
124
- strategies of expressing a value equivalent to a
superlative:
a. compound adjectives which might reduce a comparison
or a resultative clause: cold sober, icy cold =as cold as
ice; blind drunk = so drunk that you cant see straight;
freezing cold = so cold that you freeze; stinking rich, sky-
high; stone-cold.
b. structures with a prepositional genitive, expressing a
metaphorical value: a mountain of a wave, a devil of a
child, etc;
c. prepositional phrases: beyond ones power, without
equal, beyond compare, scared to death, full to the brim
(the last three examples are hyperboles) etc;
d. quantitative hendiadys, i.e. the conjoining of two
synonymous elements: null and void, safe and sound, etc;
e. similes: as drunk as a lord, as white as snow, as like as
two peas;
f. metaphors: he is a lion;
g. litotes: he is no coward;
h. in colloquial style, the relative superlative is used with
absolute value without explicitly specifying the set of
characteristics referred to:
He is the most! cf Rom. E maxim!
125
(adjective + noun): my better half; this better choice;
such structures can make up idioms:
Where is your better half (= spouse)?
I did that against my better judgement.
78
If the relative superlative adjective is not followed by a noun or a noun
substitute in the surface structure (the noun was deleted), then the article
becomes optional: Which mountain is (the) highest?
126
accurate. The pattern corresponds to the situation in
Romanian. The semantic function of the superlative is to
select one or more members out of a set because they
rank first or last on a scale that measures a particular
attribute. The comparative ignores the extremes of the
scale, unlike the superlative, and deals with any two
points anywhere on the scale with regard to two or more
individuals/objects, etc. The number of objects compared
is therefore not the most important thing considered by
the English users when selecting between comparative
and superlative.
Another example of using particular forms for
comparing two elements is the lesser + noun;
nevertheless, the domain of nouns to be used in such a
construction is not unlimited; the result is in some cases
almost an idiom: the lesser of two evils/ the lesser evil
(Celce-Murcia, 1999: 748) cf Rom. cel mai mic din dou
rele.
The same article is used with comparatives when they are
part of idioms: So much the better cu att mai bine.
127
The indefinite article is used as an
intensifier; it can precede a superlative or be part of a
determiner used as an intensifier: a good/great deal +
comparative, a lot + comparative:
She met a most interesting man (= a man who
was extremely interesting).
He was a most gracious host.
The customer is a good deal more dissatisfied
than last time.
It would be a lot better if they left earlier.
128
Too is used as an antonym of very, also colloquial
and emphatic.
He isnt too bright. = He isnt very bright. He is
rather stupid.
They dont feel too good about leaving now. They
feel pretty bad about it.
The linguistic strategy involves an euphemistic
structure obligatorily containing a verb in the negative.
Such a use, which is restricted to semantically negative
contexts, is more specific to American English.
Celce-Murcia (1999: 742) questions the
grammaticality of a sentence like
?This food is too good.79
We would counterargue by exemplifying with an almost
idiomatic structure, identical in point of semantic-
pragmatic value and lexicalization in the two languages:
Its too good to be true. E prea frumos s fie
adevrat.
Too much and too little are used with an absolute
superlative value in implicit negative contexts too:
He eats too much and walks too little.
79
Native speakers of Romanian would recognize a similar structure in
Romanian, used in a TV commercial for yogurt: Prea bun! Prea ca la ar!
The pattern of thinking is similar in Romanian and the resulting use
generally invoves a negative connotation: E prea mult!
129
a. a gradual increase/decrease: bigger and bigger; more
and more beautiful; less and less committed, all being
reduced to the synonymous construction ever bigger; ever
more beautiful; ever less committed cf Rom din ce n ce
mai mare/ frumos; din ce n ce mai puin implicat;
b. an intensified increase: far more beautiful than; more
beautiful by far than; by far the most beautiful;
c. a parallel increase: two sentences are juxtaposed, each
of them having the structure definite article + adjective in
the comparative + subject + verb; some of these
structures have been reduced, preserving just the
adjectives in the comparative, becoming proverbs:
The higher your expectations are, the more
disappointed you will get.
The sooner, the better. (the subjects and the verbs
are unimportant, it is the manner of performing the actions
which matters)
130
Frances wines French wines
Americas political system American political system
Englands cheeses English cheeses
131
*John lives the farthest away of all and he is the elderest
of all.
*The unhappily married man feels badly about his
cheating.
*They drive real good.
*Coffee good is always a treat after a meal.
132
VII. Give the marked counterparts and explain the
pragmatic connotations:
How old/ wide/ big/ strong/ far/ tall/ true/ good/ wise/ high
+ V + S?
Give your own examples to make your point.
Bibliography:
133
Levichi, L. 1970. Limba englez contemporan.
Morfologie. Bucureti: Editura Didactic i
Pedagogic.
Levichi, L. & I. Preda. 1992. Gramatica limbii engleze.
Bucureti: Editura Mondero.
Nedelcu, C. 2004. English Grammar. Craiova:
Universitaria.
Noonan, M. 2005. A Course in English Grammar, volume
1, English 403: Modern English Grammar, version
9/05, typography by Deborah I. Mulvaney.
http://www.coursehero.com/file/1257173/CEGV1/
Prlog, H. 1995. The English Noun Phrase. Timioara:
Hestia Publishing House.
Quirk, R. & S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, J. Svartvik. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London & NY: Longman.
Thomson, A. J. & A.V. Martinet. 1997. A Practical English
Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
134
Chapter V
THE PRONOUN
5.1. Definition
5.2. Characteristics
5.3. Classification
5.3.1. Personal pronouns
5.3.1.1. Inflection
5.3.1.2. Reference and role in
communication
5.3.1.3. Substantivization
5.3.1.4. Syntactic functions
5.3.2. Possessive pronouns and adjectives
5.3.2.1. Characteristics
5.3.2.2. Syntactic functions
5.3.2.3. Pragmatic aspects
5.3.3. SELF pronouns
5.3.3.1. Form
5.3.3.2. Classification
5.3.3.3. Syntactic functions and
distribution
5.3.4. Demonstrative pronouns
135
5.3.4.1. Inventory and characteristics
5.3.4.2. Demonstrative adjectives
5.3.4.3. Demonstrative pronouns vs 3-rd
person personal pronouns
5.3.5. Reciprocal pronouns
5.3.5.1. Form
5.3.5.2. Meaning
5.3.5.3. Syntactic functions
5.3.5.4. Pragmatic tendencies
5.3.6. Interrogative and relative pronouns
5.3.6.1. Inventory and characteristics
5.3.6.2. Semantic and pragmatic aspects
5.3.6.3. Relative pronouns and adjectives
5.3.7. Indefinite pronouns
5.3.7.1. Definition
5.3.7.2. Origin
5.3.7.3. Classification
5.3.7.4. Characteristics
5.3.7.5. The all, every, each group
5.3.7.6. The both, (n)either group
5.3.7.7. The some, any, no group
5.3.7.8. The much, many, (a) few, (a) little
group
5.3.7.9. The other, another group
Topics for discussion
136
5.1. Definition
Pronouns are the inflectional part of speech which
substitutes a noun. Definitely, the criterion involved in
defining them is a functional one, but it can be assimilated
to the semantic criterion as well, since the substitution
role characterizes the pronoun semantically too. Its
meaning depends on the meaning of the substituted
antecedent.
If we try to give a more general definition, pronouns
are a member of the class of pro-forms, which is highly
heterogeneous, i.e. its members have rather distinct
features and are difficult to be put together, unless their
functional role is considered. Quirk (1985: 335) disagrees
with the term pronoun, considering it a misnomer. He
favours the term pro-form, which designates closed-class
words with nominal value, where nominal means noun-
like, like a noun phrase. Pro-forms are used either for co-
reference (personal, reflexive, possessive and
demonstrative pronouns) or for substitution (indefinite
pronouns and the demonstratives that and those).
Substitution, the function which defines pronouns, is
described by Quirk as a main pronominal feature, a
relation between pro-form and antecedent, the pronoun
having replaced a repeated occurrence of the
antecedent (Quirk, 1985: 863).
5.2. Characteristics
- they have no meaning of their own; in other words, they
borrow the reference of the noun they replace; it does
137
not mean that they are meaningless, like form words
(prepositions, articles, conjunctions), but that they have
variable reference depending on the element they
substitute:
The teacher is missing for the moment. You have to
wait for him.
Is that your brother? I dont recognize him.
In other cases, the reference of the pronoun is
independent of any other linguistic element, since it is
deducible or recoverable from the situational context: it is
the case of the pronoun you in the previous example.
Using Quirks terminology80, recoverability is a
characteristic of pronouns; actually, it is the essential
condition ensuring the efficiency of pronouns in
communication. Recoverability can be textual, depending
on the linguistic context, situational, depending on the
situational context, and structural, depending on the
users knowledge of grammatical structures. It is
important, nevertheless, to remember that the three types
intertwine and, for instance, English word order is linked
to the grammatical patterns and the linguistic context is in
itself part of the situation of communication, it reflects it in
a certain way. Following Quirks line of thinking, pro-forms
can be subdivided into substitution pro-forms and co-
referential81 pro-forms. The former type includes
80
Quirk, 1985: 861.
81
Co-referentiality is the bond of cross-reference between two items or
expressions which refer to the same thing or set of things; as mentioned
before, it is the typical function of pronouns.
138
pronouns highly dependent on the linguistic context,
which are either definite or indefinite, and can be replaced
by the antecedent, this being the test in order to check
their belonging to the class under discussion. Co-
referential pro-forms (pronouns and pronoun-related
adverbs) are always definite.
Co-referentiality is the typical function of pronouns
but it is not a necessary condition. It opposes the
indeterminate character of pronouns, i.e. their capacity of
referring to an element deducible from the situation of
communication:
Jane admitted she was late. (She can be co-
referential with the antecedent Jane or it can send back to
a previous situation of communication , in which case, co-
referentiality does not check.)
82
Other languages, such as Romanian and French, have suppletive forms for
personal pronouns: eu, tu, noi, ei vs je, tu il, nous, etc.
139
communication, that would lead to negative effects. The
exception given by grammar books is the category of
-self pronouns (reflexive and emphatic). The reason
behind this assertion is that self pronouns, being
compound with an element which is also a word, are
transparent both formally and semantically in any context.
83
With the last example, it can be counter-argued that the noun self has
turned into a combining form; this term, combining form, reflects the
intermediary status of a lexical item between a word and an affix. Some
might even consider that self/ves tend to become a grammatical suffix, thus
losing its lexical meaning altogether.
84
Quirk (1985: 335) states that they are intrinsically either definite or
indefinite, so they incorporate their own determiner.
85
Personal pronouns are an exception presented when discussing this type of
pro-forms.
140
5.3. Classification
5.3.1. Personal Pronouns, together with reflexive
and possessive pronouns, are considered the most
important type of pronouns, making up the subclass of
central pronouns. This has in view their inflectional
features and their frequency of use.
5.3.1.1. Inflection
They have the following grammatical categories
marked: person, number, gender (only for the third person
singular) and case. We have already mentioned the
suppletive character of pronouns, present also with
personal pronouns. Therefore, it is not the inflections
which mark the categories enumerated above. They are
implicitly marked (covert) and the characteristics of the
pronoun are more easily recognized by the user within the
sentence they are part of, after observing their place:
141
Pronouns Case
(person, gender) Number
Nominative Genitive86 Dative/
(possessive Accusative
pronouns &
adjectives)
1-st person I Mine/my (to/for) me
143
colloquial style is exploited as a stylistic means; the cases
which allow interchangeability in point of Nominative and
Accusative forms maintain valid when two pronominal
elements are coordinated. This proves that it is the
governing element (preposition, link verb) which allows or
blocks the use of the two case forms in free variation.
We took over Bibers selection of relevant contexts
(1999: 335) which exhibit the use of Nominative and
Accusative pronouns in free variation:
144
association of the Nominative forms I and he with the
relative pronoun who is explained by the semantic feature
[+human] of the latter. The whole sentence is a Cleft
Construction, the personal pronoun being syntactically the
predicative and semantically the complement of the non-
referential it. Functionally me is the focus, the highlighted
element or identifier (Halliday, 1994).
87
Quirk (1985: 337) sustains this assertion, too.
145
discussion since the root of the pronouns in the
Accusative is identical with the Nominative, the difference
consisting in the presence of the preposition as a marker
of the Accusative: (Ea) e la fel de liber ca el/ cum este i
el (nsui).
146
be resumed by the plural pronoun we: Myself / me and
Ann, we cant come or Ann and me/myself, we cant
come.
Accusative forms are generally critised but the
exaggerated application of prescriptive grammar rules can
lead to situations of hyper-correctness in the use of the
Nominative, even if, in such contexts, the Accusative
should be the natural choice, for instance after
prepositions: for you and I instead of for you and me; like
you and I instead of like you and me.
The Accusative form is frequently used in the
following cases:
- it can anticipate the pronominal subject in the
Nominative: Me, I cant do it. Such an example reflects
explicitly and redundantly the contrast between the
subject and the others. We consider that the double co-
referential pronominal forms can be explained as a result
of an ellipsis applied to a set phrase: (As for )me, I cant
do it. In the familiar register an example such as Us girls
can always take a joke88 is possible.
- the Accusative form can be used as an affirmative
answer to a question, being the reduction to a mono-
member sentence of a simple sentence having the pattern
pronominal subject + auxiliary/modal: Who told him that?
Me. Such a substitution of Accusative for Nominative is
impossible in Romanian: Cine i-a spus asta? Eu.
88
Quirk, 1985: 339.
147
- Accusative is used is after an infinitive; such situations
are of interest because they create new reflexive forms,
associated with the personal pronoun in the plural if the
meaning is generic. The Accusative forms are kept in the
plural but they combine with the singular form self to
render the generic reference: ourself, themself: You wont
be the first or last man or woman who gets themself
involved in a holiday romance. We find ourself (Biber,
1999: 340). If there is no co-referential subject expressed
within the sentence the use of a reflexive pronoun instead
of the personal pronoun is blocked:
They explained that he/* himself and Jane couldnt
do it.
He explained that he/* himself and Jane couldnt
do it.
In Romanian the reflexive pronoun is never used in that
way, only an reflexive adjective could be selected to
emphasize the personal pronoun.
In conversation, the Accusative case is used in
compound nominal structures introduced by as and than,
exactly as it happens with pronominal elements used
alone. Within the reference utterance, such structures
tend to be peripheral or non-integrated. They can
anticipate the focus sentence or they can be part of a
disjunctive question:
As for me and John, we cant decide yet.
Shouldnt we decide, me and John?
148
Personal pronouns can be modified by:
- adjectives, in the informal register: Poor me! Silly you!
- appositions, mostly in the familiar register but not only:
You people should know better.
We doctors are responsible for our patients.
-relative clauses, mostly in the formal register: We who
have sworn to serve and protect
-adverbs: you there = you who are saying there (elliptical
construction)
-prepositional phrases: you near the window (idem as in
the previous example)
- emphatic adjectives: you yourself;
-indefinite adjectives: they all = all of them; you both =
both of you; we each = each of us.
A Historical view
During the period of Middle English (XIth- XVIth cent.), the
pronominal forms in y- begin to appear in contexts with
the feature [+singular], when the addressee was a person
with authority (monarch or bishop). This polite usage was
the result of imitating similar usages of personal pronouns
in Latin and French. In Early Modern English (XVIth- XVIIth
cent.) a complex system of selection between th- or y-
forms developed, considering contexts with the feature
[+singular]. In French, German and Spanish there is a
common tendency of borrowing the plural forms of
personal pronouns to denote one referent, as a marker of
respect. Hope (2003: 73) considers social relationships as
149
the major factor in choosing between the forms in th- or
y-. The former were specific for the upper classes, the
latter for the lower ones.
The two parallel systems governing pronoun
selection were the system of social values, relatively
stable, and the system of variable affective values. The
two systems interact; there are general tendencies and
expectations of the interlocutors, which are based on the
former system but which are always reversible when the
second system intervenes. The forms in th are the
recessive set of the two pairs of second person personal
pronouns existing in early modern English. These
pronouns of Scandinavian origin entered English through
the Northern English dialects which were under Danish
influence and had a well-established role: their
introduction solved the problem of the ambiguity created
in Old English between the forms of singular and those of
plural in case of h- forms. From a synchronic perspective,
linguists dont agree on the inventory of second person
personal pronouns. Gramley i Patzold (1992: 288)
consider that, beyond the purpose or the speakers
intentions, English has a single second person personal
pronoun, you. English does not formally mark the
distinction between singular and plural between the
colloquial and polite register as far as second person
pronouns are concerned. Hope (op. cit.: 90) considers the
dropping of pronominal markers for second person
singular pronoun in standard English as an usual
150
phenomenon, since most languages retained those
markers.
The evolution of th- and y- forms in the history of
the English language is presented in the next table
(Wales, 1996: 77):
Middle
The end of
Old English (up XVIIth XXth
the XXth
English to the XVIth cent.
cent.
cent.)
Thou singular colloquial marked archaic
part of the
you plural polite unmarked common
core
152
- the formula of addressing you guys initially
presupposed exclusive reference to male persons, but,
under the influence of American English, the referents
gender has become irrelevant in the usage of the
syntagm. Noonan (2005: 71) asserts that in contemporary
American English the commonest second person plural
pronoun is you guys, generally used among speakers
under 50 in the US. It is neutral in gender and makes
reference to both males and females. In point of stylistic
register, the syntagm belongs to the informal style; it can
also express disguised authority when the speaker
intends to change the direction of a conversation, from the
general level to direct involvement. The expression has a
series of partial synonyms: you chaps, used in British
English by older generations to make reference to male
referents; you fellows, you boys, you girls, used in
American English for white, middle-class referents. The
syntagm you fellows tends to be used by [-male]
interlocutors if the feature [+similarity] is implied, in the
sense of mateship or camaraderie, in spite of the fact that
the noun fellow is a synonym of guy, respectively chap,
therefore it is marked for gender.
- You lot belongs to colloquial, familiar style,
implying authoritative, sometimes even impolite
connotation, marking the speakers disconsideration and
arrogance. The combination is influenced by the
frequency of the noun lot in colloquial English. Wales
153
states that the choice of this syntagm is favoured by the
presence in the context of the noun lot.
The marking of second person personal pronouns
for number, both in case of multiple referents and for
social differentiation, can be accomplished by affixation
only outside the borders of standard English:
- the form yous(e), used in Dublin and the northern part of
England and USA. Quirk (1985: 6.12) considers this form
as a low-prestige form, unacceptable from the point of
view of linguistic prestige. (apud Wales, op. cit.: 73)
- there are a multitude of variants of differentiating
singular from plural, not used in writing, since they belong
to informal, colloquial register and consequently appear in
family conversations; they all contain the pronoun yous,
become a determinant: two of yous, any of yous, yous
two, yous lot, bugger yous, all of yous.
154
Who are you to question my decision? (first
person pronoun will always refer to the same role, i.e. the
speaker). In other words, the communicative role of the
first and second person pronouns is automatically
established, only their reference can pose some problems
in written texts, whereas with third person pronouns there
is no role in communication attached, since they refer to
people not present in the communicative event. It is their
reference which can arouse some ambiguities in
interpretation. An exception is when the person referred to
by using a third person pronoun is present in the situation
of communication, but the speaker pretends that is not
true, not to make the referent feel diminished:
Look at her! She is behaving as if she is alone in
the room!89
First person personal pronouns always refer to the
speaker, they encode the reference to the person who
makes the utterance; similarly, second person pronouns
encode the reference to the hearer. It is irrelevant in our
discussion if the speaker is also the source of the
message or just the messenger, the addresser; in the
same way, it is irrelevant whether the hearer is the
addressee or just the receiver of the message:
You will obey the rules. Bosss orders. (the
addresser is not the source)
89
The reply can be said by the speaker as a part of a soliloquy, but the
reproach intention is preserved. Of course, such a communicative strategy is
to be used only when there is a close personal relationship between the two
interlocutors.
155
The absents are to hand me their homework in
three days time. (the addressee is not identical with the
hearer)
156
of stressing the subject. Most examples of cataphoric
pronouns imply the presence of two sentences:
90
The pronouns you and they are used in informal register; the latter can
refer to the authorities, media, the government, implying a certain feeling of
threat, according to Quirk (1985: 354).
157
found in written texts, more precisely in magazines; the
choice of spelling the two pronouns with capitals has two
values: it expresses the generic value of the two pronouns
- HE = men; SHE = women and an implicit contrast
between the subjects; such a headline would be
interpreted by readers as referring to the whole class of
men and women, respectively. The same strategy is used
in Romanian: EA vrea una, EL vrea alta. One should not
mistake this use of spelling with capitals for the use of the
initial capitalized letter when referring to God: I believe in
God and He tells us to respect our parents.
158
2.a. It turned out to be a problem.
2.b. It is easy to learn English.
2a and 2b are examples where it anticipates an infinitival
clause; the main clause can contain a nominal predicate
or a verbal one;
Lets cab it, I dont feel like walking. Hai s-o lum
cu taxiul, n-am chef de mers pe jos.
91
Quirk (1985: 348) considers this value of IT as being also a case of empty
IT or prop IT, as he calls it, since the pronoun has a purely grammatical
value. He refines his position further and talks about various degrees of
emptiness or meaningless.
159
-emphatic IT, used to emphasize any part of the sentence
(subject, object, adverbial modifier) except for the verb; it
appears in emphatic structures cleft constructions:
*****
Personal pronouns in the plural have some specific
referential characteristics. Following our considerations92
regarding the referential potential of the pronoun we (cf
Rom. noi), the general synthetic relation below would sum
up all its pragmatic values:
92
Pisoschi, 2010: 89-96.
160
is also possible. Wales associates such a case with a
higher subjective value (1996: 59). Group solidarity or a
contrast we- others, the strangers (outsiders, the aliens,
not like us93) is implied. Quirk (1985: 6.21) mentions that
group solidarity can presuppose social inferiority, which
stresses the oppositions, the others being considered as
an unknown force controlling your life.
93
Wales, 1996: 60.
161
3. If they = , then WE =I + (YOU1 ++ YOUn )+
. The reference is clear.
162
identification of the referent and a manifestation of
empathy towards him/her.94
94
Hallidays example is: Have we lost our dolly then? Ne-am pierdut
ppuica deci?
95
Quirk, 1985: 350) considers editorial we as being [-addressee] and
authorial we [+addressee].
163
would be perceived as egotistical. The conventions tend
to change in favour of the more informal pronoun I,
accepted in academic writing and critiques. Wales (1996:
66) considers that authorial we has the semantic features
[+ ego] and collocates with declarative or mental verbs or
appears in anaphoric sentences:
164
The linguistic context, the intentions of the speaker
and the conversational purposes contribute to the correct
interpretation of we; its reference can change within the
same utterance. Nunberg (1993) gives the following
example:
165
For the third person plural personal pronoun the
combination possibilities are very numerous, having a
minimum of two elements to be combined and a
maximum of n. Each component specific for masculine,
feminine and neuter respectively, can have an unlimited
number of referents:
5.3.1.3. Substantivization
The substantivization of personal pronouns is of
concern just in point of the conversion potential of
pronouns. We referred to this topic when discussing the
characteristics of pronouns; these characteristics are
166
implicit tests in order to consider a word as a pronoun or
not. Personal pronouns never accept definite articles but,
strictly referring to third person personal pronouns in the
singular96, their conversion into nouns obligatorily implies
their collocation with indefinite articles:
John has a baby! Its a he or a she? Its a she,
not a he.
96
It would be illogical to give a first or second person personal pronoun a
[-definite] reference by preceding it by an indefinite article: *An I is not a
you.
167
5.3.2. Possessive Pronouns and Adjectives
5.3.2.1. Characteristics
-they correspond to the Genitive of personal pronouns;
there is a distinction between determinative Genitive
(specific to possessive adjectives, which accompany a
noun) and independent Genitive (specific to possessive
pronouns); possessive pronouns with a determinative
function (Prlog, 1995: 56) are possessive adjectives, the
weak set of possessive pronouns (Quirk, 1985: 361). It is
evident that Quirk does not make a fundamental
distinction between the two types of possessives, their
single difference being a functional one; in his view, which
considers their stress, pronouns are always stressed;
-they are marked for person, number and gender (in the
third person singular); possessive adjectives refer to the
possessor:
Was he out of his mind?
168
Even functionally, the relationship between the two types
of possessives is obvious: Pronouns = Adjectives + s[z] +
ne[n].
169
My duty is to insist on changing their opinion about
the plan.
170
denoting different referents, to avoid ambiguity; if the
possessive is not repeated, then the reference is made to
a single referent characterized by two nouns:
your housei and your officej (the two nouns are not
coreferential; the same happens in case of the definite
article use)
my motheri and friendi (the two nouns are
coreferential)
171
added to a possessive adjective makes up a
possessive pronoun, lacking its head noun:
She makes her own, she doesnt need to buy. (the
situational context desambiguates the reference of the
pronoun her own; referenceher own {bread, butter, soap
etc}
172
5.3.3. SELF Pronouns
5.3.3.1. Form
Notes:
The first and second person pronouns are made up
by combining the corresponding possessive
adjective and the combining element self for the
173
singular with the variant selves for the plural. For
the third person forms the combination is between
the corresponding personal pronoun in the
Acccusative and self/selves.
There is no distinction for case.
A non-specific indefinite referent is designated by
the pronoun formed with the indefinite pronoun one
+ self. It is a form corresponding to the common
gender and expresses a generic value.
Politeness is rendered by a new-created form,
yourselfs, cf Rom. dumneavoastr niv/ nsev.
The form ourself corresponds to royal we and it
limited to those referents having the role of
monarchs.
5.3.3.2. Classification
It depends on the criterion adopted: if it is the formal
criterion which prevails, then there is just one class of
pronouns, SELF Pronouns; if the functional criterion is of
interest, then two classes of homonymous pronouns can
be differentiated: reflexive and emphatic pronouns. Quirk
et al (1985: 355) consider the reflexives as the basic
functional category, emphatic pronouns being subsumed
to the former category.
174
5.3.3.3. Syntactic function and distribution
The two grammatical aspects complement each other,
syntactic functions are limited by the distribution of the
pronouns in different contexts.
Reflexives have the subject as antecedent and agree
with it; they belong to the object territory (Quirk, 1985:
356) being syntactically objects (direct, indirect,
prepositional) or predicative; they can also be a
prepositional attribute:
97
Quirk calls these verbs reflexive verbs. Some verbs from this class have
double meanings, depending on whether they are followed by a reflexive
pronoun or not: to apply (oneself), to conduct (oneself) = to behave
(oneself).
175
They acquitted themselves satisfactorily. They
did their duty satisfactorily.
98
To Quirk this class and the previous represent semi-reflexive verbs.
176
Anyone but yourself would react immediately. (some
linguists consider yourself is analysed as an attribute
without the head pronoun you expressed; in this case, the
negative reproachful message of the utterance requires
the emhasis on the interlocutor.
177
5.3.4. Demonstrative Pronouns
5.3.4.1. Inventory and characteristics
The inventory comprises two forms which are
better known and others less frequent. The first two inflect
in number, the others dont.
Distance Number Form Invariable
demonstratives
[+proximal] singular this Same
plural these Such
[-proximal] singular that The former, the
plural those latter99
(the) other,
another100
99
They mean the first of two, and the last of two, respectively; they have
been mentioned and discussed when approaching comparison degrees.
100
When in the linguistic context there is another demonstrative.
178
Briefly, demostrative pronouns and adjectives can
be said to have the following characteristics:
-they relate to personal pronouns (see below the
comparison between the two classes); their reference is
rather vague (especially in the case of that which is the
stressed counterpart of it)
179
vremea asta; this ten minutes; that ten pounds (collective
interpretation of the noun in the plural).
180
In point of values, demostratives are either
dependent on the linguistic context, having anaphoric or
cataphoric value, or on the situational context, having
deictic value, sometimes ostensivelly marked, too (i.e. by
gesture). In the first case, only a small part of the original
meaning of the demostrative is retained; they become
markers of discourse deixis, anticipating or resuming a
whole sentence /part of the text; of course reference
made to an individual or entity is entirely possible:
181
obligatorily marked by the distal demonstrative cf Rom.
Ne cerem scuze acelor cititori...
182
expresses space or time location, but also connotative
values (positive or negative):
This cake is great, taste some!
This cousin of Mary is really nice!
Hows that bad leg of yours? (Prlog, 1995: 57)
This year is nothing compared to that summer
when we went sailing.
This Michael! Cf Rom. Mihai sta!
I cant stand that girl. Cf Rom. N-o suport pe fata
asta/aia. (the location of the speaker in relation to the
referent is relevant)
That bastard stole the money.
This girl, I like. (the direct object is topicalised and
dislocated for that purpose, being thus stressed.)
183
Such is a demonstrative which functions as a
pronoun or as a determiner:
He is a doctor and is known as such. E doctor i
este cunoscut n acea calitate/ ca atare.
The garden is such that you cannot see the fence.
Grdina este n aa fel [alctuit] nct nu poi vedea
gardul.
Such is the exam for them to solve all the topics.
184
express an objective reality, since the point of reference is
precisely the speaker.
Both personal pronouns and demonstratives are
used anaphorically. Since we discussed this function, we
refer now to indirect/ associative anaphora. It implies the
reference made by a word in a text (for instance, a
demonstrative) to an element which is implicit; between
the antecedent and the anaphora there is no direct
coreferentiality or conceptual identity. There is a
prototypical scenario, which means that the interlocutors
have in mind a succession of referents and actions and
also the relations among them.
When the demonstrative is an indirect anaphora,
the feature [+proximity] is present, but no longer in a
concrete manner, referring to space dimensions; it
acquires subjective shades of meaning, expressing
emphasis. This draws attention to the content of the
discourse to follow, creating suspense regarding the
pronoun reference:
185
If this has cataphoric value, that is an anaphora
and appears in contexts which contain indirect speech:
He didnt know about the party. That is what he
told me.
The distance expressed is emotional in nature and,
once the story is over, it ceases to be the center of
interest. In this case the personal pronoun can
successfully replace the demonstrative without any
difference of meaning:
He didnt know about the party. It is what he told
me.
N-a tiut despre petrecere. (Cel puin), asta este
ceea mi-a spus. (Dac lucrurile stau altfel, nu tiu.)
186
Thisi is iti! Asta e (ceea ce caut/vreau etc)! (it
refers to an inanimate referent).
When the pronoun it is a predicative, it refers to an
element clearly identified by the interlocutor, more
precisely to a whole context, and is coreferential with the
demonstrative.
187
Weve known each other/one another for ages.
(DO)
Give each other a chance (IO)
Talk to each other/ one another. (PO)
101
Nedelcu, 2004: 112.
102
Only the Genitive form whose can precede a noun.
188
- it designates a [+human] referent in most cases, even if
a [+animate] [-human] referent can be referred to:
Who wrote the letter? Mary or John?
Who spilt the milk? The cat or the dog?
103
Functioning also as Genitive for inanimate referents, since which does not
have a form for the Genitive case.
189
Which has the following characteristics:
- it designates a [+/- animate] referent;
- it implies a selection from two or more than two
elements:
Which shall I choose? (the limited range of choices
is implicit) What shall I choose? (there is an unlimited
range of possibilities)
Which way shall I go? (the same comment as
above, only that the pronominal element functions as a
determiner)
190
-the form is invariable, it has no paradigm;
- meaning: it implies selection from an indeterminate
number of elements, whether it is a pronoun or a
determiner:
What did he say?
What answer did he give?
it can imply [+ definite] reference if it is followed by a
prepositional atrribute or by a relative clause; then it has
cataphoric value and is synonymous to the definite article:
Give me what (=the) books you have on the
matter. Take whatever measures you think best. (in this
example the referent is [+specific] for both interlocutors,
but it is [-definite] for the speaker and [+definite] for the
hearer.
The association between a relative /interrogative
pronoun and the adverb ever can have two distinct
meanings, depending on whether the elements are written
in one word, making up a unit, or remain separate;
spelling reflects the semantic value; when the two
elements are separated in spelling the value is always
negative104:
What ever are you taking about? = What on earth
are you talking about? (the message is that the speaker is
annoyed by the content of the hearers utterance)
Whatever you say, be careful about how you say
it.
104
Nedelcu, 2004: 104.
191
Though by definition it refers to an inanimate
referent, what can be applied to human referents when
inquiring about somebodys character, profession, etc:
What is she? = What is her profession/occupation?
Who is she? (it refers to the persons identity) Which
is she? (it refers to the space location of the referent in
the situation of communication)
192
Who did what? Cine ce a fcut?
Who has been cheating on whom? Cine pe cine
a nelat?
Sometimes the question is an echo question, the intention
of the speaker being to express a certain state of mind
(surprise, irritation, reproach and warning for the future
not to say the same thing, etc):
Shes what? ( I dont believe that./ Repeat that if
you dare.)
193
5.3.6.3. Relative pronouns and adjectives
As relative pronouns or adjectives, interrogative
elements preserve their characteristics, both in form and
in meaning, their value is the one which becomes
somehow different.
We consider of concern the following aspects
regarding relative pronouns: the type of Relative Clause
introduced; the function of the relative element, totally
independent of the syntactic status of the clause
introduced.
That introduces Restrictive Relative Clause,
obligatory for the meaning of the whole sentence; it can
replace [+/- animate] referents and it can be omitted if its
function is not that of subject:
The man that/ you see is my workmate.
The flowers that/ * smell so nice are imported
from the Netherlands.
194
That followed by prepositions is placed in end-
position in the sentence can be replaced by relative
adverbs, which are shorter and preferred in spoken
language because of that:
That is the town (that) you live in? = That is the
town where you live?
That is the time that he arrived at. = Thats the
time when he arrived.
Its the reason that he came here for. = Its the
reason why he came here.
195
5.3.7.2. Origin: initially they were noun phrases
made up of a quantifier + noun (with general meaning)
Indefinite Pronoun Noun Phrase (Quantifier + Noun)
5.3.7.4. Characteristics:
- they parallel the NPs with the corresponding
determiners:
196
every single person = everybody;
some food = something to eat;
no observer = no one.
- common in conversation and fiction: -one compounds
are [+formal] and specific to the written register and
body compounds are common in conversation.
We will discuss them considering their semantic
classification:
197
Every functions only as an indefinite
adjective, preceding a count noun in the singular. It is
synonymous to all + noun (plural), but, unlike the use of
all, it is the individuals who matter. Every means a
collection of single people or things (Budai, 1997: 309).
Pragmatically, it can acquire particular values in
certain contexts or patterns:
- with uncount nouns it means all possible:
I need every help I can get.
Make sure we have every assistance.
- in the pattern every + numeral + noun it expresses
recurrence or time intervals:
Every ten days they will send an e-mail.
- in the pattern every + other + noun it means all the
others or alternate:
I left, every other guest stayed.
They go home every other weekend.
- preceding a possessive adjective means all the
possible:
His every work is being studied.
198
The focus in on the individual but as part of a
group, and the reference is generally made to a small
number of elements. Prlog (1995: 64) suggests that the
separate items form a whole when every is used, whereas
with each attention is directed to the separate item or unit.
Every tends to gather the separate units into a whole;
each focuses attention on the units individually and so
tends to disperse the unity. (Budai, 1997: 309)
Every employee loves the management! Have
you checked with each person?
Every man had a weapon = All men had weapons.
Each man had a weapon. (the speaker went to each
man in turn and checked that he had a weapon)
(Thomson & Martinet, 1997: 64)
199
Trees lined either side (= both sides) of the street.
200
count nouns, or referring to an indefinite number/quantity
if used with an uncountable noun:
We have some time. Here are some jewels
from the robbery.
Structurally, it can be followed by an of phrase to
explain the class of elements referred to in terms of an
indefinite number/quantity:
Some of her friends are not here today.
The pronoun becomes a determiner if preceding a noun
phrase containing a numeral and a noun, the meaning
being aproximatively:
We met some 30 people.
An explicit contrast can be expressed when an indefinite
number of elements is referred to:
Some will believe you, others wont.
Pragmatically, it can express emphasis, almost a
superlative value, the range of connotations being though
rather wide:
That was some answer! (admiration, some of
importance)
Some friend you are to stand me up. (irony)
201
Any of you/ of the students can come on our trip
tomorrow. (indefinite reference regarding the individuals
but the selection is limited to a group)
Anybody (= any human being) can do that.
Anybody loves somebody. (the selection is not
limied to a group, unless we define the group by the class
of elements implicitly denoted by the noun substituted by
the indefinite pronoun)
Negative connotation implies emphasis; adding the
adverb just that emphasis is increased:
I dont give my phone number to (just) any
student.
In interrogative sentences it has an indefinite value
and in negative contexts it has a negative meaning, being
used to avoid the ungrammaticality of double negation
sentences; if used as a determiner, it collocates with both
count and uncount nouns; when used as a pronoun, it has
anaphoric value and it can replace any type of noun:
202
There arent any children in here. (Prlog, 1995:
61) = There isnt a single child/ even one child in here.
203
- the noun substituted can be count or uncount:
None of the patients had post-op complications.
I had more time last year to meet my friends, but
now I have none. (= no time)
204
several and enough and analyse only them at this point of
our presentation:
Several means some but not many and it can be
followed by an of phrase; it replaces or determines count
nouns in the plural:
They went their several ways.
Enough substitutes or determines uncount or count
nouns. We have also discussed it as an adjective:
I have enough friends / enough influence not to
worry about my enemies.
Are you enough of a friend to me to tell me the
truth?
Enough is enough.
It is usually placed after a noun but it can precede
it too:
We have food enough/ enough food for
everybody.
We are friends enough to tell me the truth.
205
demonstrative pronouns, as we have pointed out when
discussing the latter.
II. Fill in the blanks with the right pronoun and explain
your choice. Find the Romanian translation of the
sentence/phrase and explain the similarities/ differences
in the use of pronouns:
206
Much will have .
would be wise, if things were to be done twice.
To know is to know .
so deaf as who wont hear.
An after wit is s wit.
One good turn deserves .
Of two evils choose the .
is your sister?
is their favourite book?
Did you see ducks?
did you meet?
do we choose?
He knows whats .
on earth is she doing?
207
6. Possessives have the same form as pronouns and
determiners. T/F
7. Pronouns can be subject, direct and indirect object,
complement [subject /object complement, i.e. predicative
or predicative adjunct]105 and prepositional complement.
T/F
8. Pronouns are substitutes for nouns or noun phrases.
T/F
9. Pronouns are never substitutes for finite clauses. T/F
10. Interrogative pronouns replace unknown subjects and
objects. T/F
V. Identify the pronouns and pronominal adjectives
(determiners) and mention their type:
105
Our note.
208
VI. State the semantic and syntactic functions of it:
209
I talked to one student, then to . You just pass from to
and cannot decide. She is out, all are at home. He
didnt like the blouse and asked to be shown . Its one
thing to listen to one, and to believe him.
210
XI. Discuss the reference:
Bibliography:
211
Crystal, David. 21985. A Dictionary of Linguistics and
Phonetics, NY: Basil Blackwell.
Fisiak, J. 1968. A Short grammar of Middle English, I,
Warsawa, Pastwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Fromkin, V. & R. Rodman.1998. An Introduction to
Language, 6-th edition. Boston: Thomson & Heinle.
Gleanu-Frnoag, G. & E. Comiel. 1993. Gramatica
limbii engleze pentru uz colar. Bucureti:
Omegapres & RAI.
Gramley, G. & K. M. Ptzold. 1992. A Survey of Modern
English. London: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K.1985, 21994. An Introduction to
Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hope, J. Shakespeares Grammar. 2003. London:
Thomson Learning, High Holborn House,
Ilovici, E. & M. Chioran, M. Ciofu. 1970. A Practical Guide
to English Grammar. Exerciii de gramatic.
Bucureti: Editura Didactic i Pedagogic.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 1980, 1999. L'enonciation. Paris:
Armand Colin.
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London:
Longman.
Levichi, L. & I. Preda. 1992. Gramatica limbii engleze.
Bucureti: Editura Mondero.
Levichi, L. 1970. Limba englez contemporan.
Morfologie. Bucureti: Editura Didactic i
Pedagogic.
212
Montgomery, M. 2001. British and Irish Antecedents, n
J. Algeo (ed) Cambridge History of the English
Language vol. 6: American English, pp.86-153.
Nedelcu, C. 2004. English Grammar. Craiova:
Universitaria.
Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1993. Indexicality and Deixis, n
Linguistics and Philosophy, 16:1.
Partee, Barbara.1989. Binding Implicit Variables in
Quantified Contexts. Papers of the Chicago
Linguistic Society, 25, pp. 342-365.
Prlog, H. 1995. The English Noun Phrase. Timioara:
Hestia Publishing House.
Pisoschi, C.G. 2010. Deixisul personal: valene ale
pronumelor personale i de politee. Aspecte
contrastive romn-englez. Craiova: Editura
Universitaria.
Quirk, R. & S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, J. Svartvik. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London & NY: Longman.
Reboul, A. & J. Moeschler. 1998. Pragmatique du
discours. Paris: Armand Colin.
Thomson, A. J. & A.V. Martinet. 1997. A Practical English
Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
Wales, K. Personal Pronouns in Presentday English.
Cambridge: CUP, 1996.
Wales, K. Second Person pronouns in Contemporary
English: The End of the Story or Just
theBeginning?
213
http://cvc.cervantes.es/obref/coloquio_paris/ponen
cias/pdf/cvc_wales.pdf, 2009.
214
BIBLIOGRAPHY
215
Fromkin, V. & R. Rodman. 1998. An Introduction to
Language, 6-th edition. Boston: Thomson & Heinle.
Gleanu-Frnoag, G. & E.Comiel. 1993. Gramatica
limbii engleze pentru uz colar. Bucureti:
Omegapres & RAI.
Gramley, G. & K. M. Ptzold. 1992. A Survey of Modern
English. London: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985, 21994. An Introduction to
Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hope, J. Shakespeares Grammar. 2003. London:
Thomson Learning, High Holborn House,
Ilovici, E. & M. Chioran, M. Ciofu. 1970. A Practical Guide
to English Grammar. Exerciii de gramatic.
Bucureti: Editura Didactic i Pedagogic.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 1980, 1999. L'enonciation. Paris:
Armand Colin.
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London:
Longman.
Levichi, L. & I. Preda. 1992. Gramatica limbii engleze.
Bucureti: Editura Mondero.
Levichi, L. 1970. Limba englez contemporan.
Morfologie. Bucureti: Editura Didactic i
Pedagogic.
Lyons, J. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Marchand, H. 1969. The Categories and Types of
Present-day English Word Formation. Munich.
216
Montgomery, M. 2001. British and Irish Antecedents, n
J. Algeo (ed) Cambridge History of the English
Language vol. 6: American English, pp.86-153.
Murar, I. 2010. A History of the English Language.
Craiova: Editura Universitaria.
Nedelcu, C. 2004. English Grammar. Craiova:
Universitaria.
Noonan, M. 2005. A Course in English Grammar, volume
1, English 403: Modern English Grammar, version
9/05, typography by Deborah I. Mulvaney.
http://www.coursehero.com/file/1257173/CEGV1/
Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1993. Indexicality and Deixis, n
Linguistics and Philosophy, 16:1.
Partee, Barbara.1989. Binding Implicit Variables in
Quantified Contexts. Papers of the Chicago
Linguistic Society, 25, pp. 342-365.
Prlog, H. 1995. The English Noun Phrase. Timioara:
Hestia Publishing House.
Pisoschi, C.G. 2010. Deixisul personal: valene ale
pronumelor personale i de politee. Aspecte
contrastive romn-englez. Craiova: Editura
Universitaria.
Quirk, R. & S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, J. Svartvik. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London & NY: Longman.
Reboul, A. & J. Moeschler. 1998. Pragmatique du
discours. Paris: Armand Colin.
217
Stump, Gregory T. 1998. Inflection in The Handbook of
Morphology, Spencer and Zwicky, eds. Oxford:
Blackwell.
Thomson, A. J. & A.V. Martinet. 1997. A Practical English
Grammar. Oxford: OUP.
Wales, K. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Presentday
English. Cambridge: CUP.
Wales, K. 2009. Second Person pronouns in
Contemporary English: The End of the Story or
Just theBeginning?
http://cvc.cervantes.es/obref/coloquio_paris/ponen
cias/pdf/cvc_wales.pdf
218