Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Introduction
With the rapid modernisation of Japan since the opening of the country in 1868 the
influence of Western thoughts and techniques also had a great impact on Japanese modern
literature. Western literature was translated into Japanese and influenced Japanese writers who
adapted their prose and poetry to European styles like for example dadaism, futurism,
expressionism and the like. Notably two schools evolved from these influences and were
popular during the mid-twenties: The realistic schools of the so-called I novels of the
But there was also another literature movement between 1924 and 1930 that became
known as the Shinkankaku-ha or New Sensationalist school and is often marked as the
origin of Modernism in Japanese fiction. The New Sensationalist school revolted against the
realistic schools and experimented with the new techniques that had been created in Europe
after World War I. It is widely associated with its leader Yokomitsu Riichi (1898-1947),
although only a few of his works are clearly connected to this movement. (Keene 1987:644)
In this essay I want to concentrate on Yokomitsu Riichi and point out some characteristics
who was engaged in building a railway line, which meant that Yokomitsu was constantly
moving around the country following the work of his father. Consequently, Yokomitsu lacked
of a place he could call home which might be the reason for his dislike of the I novels for
1
wich origins play such an important role. Nevertheless, at every stage of his career, the works
that involve his personal experience are said to be Yokomitsus best. (Keene 1987:645) This
seems to be paradoxical but the fact, that his youth was determined by the building of a
railway line can also be compared to the external factors that determine the characters of his
novels.
Satire and trivial occurances are characteristic for Yokomitsus literary works. Yokomitsu
sees sensation in trivial situations and said that if he could express this sensation adequately,
a philosophy symbolic of life and fate would emerge from a mere sensation (Yokomitsu cited
after Keene 1987:647). But he did not only speak of Sensationalism but of New
Sensationalism which he explained in the first issue of the movements magazine Bungei Jidai
The difference between sensation and new sensation is this: that the objectivity of
the object that bursts into life is not purely objective, but is rather the representation of
that emotional cognition which has broken away from subjective objectivity,
incorporating as it does both a formal appearance and also the generalized consciousness
within it. And it is thus that the new sensationalist method is able to appear in a more
dynamic form to the understanding than the sensationalist method by virtue of the fact
that it gives a more material representation of an emotional apprehension. (Yokomitsu
cited after Keene 1987:644)
Giving this definition of New Sensationalism Yokomitsu explains objectivity as more than
the mere appearance of an object. There is also subjective meaning connected to an object
which makes it possible to use the object in a representative way to express these meanings.
Taking also the time of the creation of the New Sensationalist School into consideration,
the impact of the Great Earthquake in September 1923 is very clear. Just like most Japanese,
Yokomitsu realized the great loss of their old culture and the neccessity to create a new one.
2
The beliefs I had held concerning beauty were shattered by this desaster, and I
entered what people call my New Sensabilies period. As far as the eye could see, the
great city stretched out around me in a vast, unbelievable plain of ashes. Such was the
scene within which the automobile, that monstrous incarnation of speed, first began to
prowl among us. Suddenly the radio appeared, that abnormal offspring of sound. The
artificial bird called the airplane first began to fly the skies as a thing that could be used.
All these concrete embodiments of modern science first sprang up in our country just
after the earthquake. The sensibilities of people who were in their youth when such
venguards of modern science took shape one after another on the burned out plain
simply had to change. (Yokomitsu cited after Campbell 1972: 28)
The awkward feelings towards new techniques Yokomitsu expresses in this statement,
reflect the enormous change in Japanese culture. The western modernity that suddenly swept
over Japan must have been overwhelming and it might be in reaction to this that Yokomitsu
tried to give subjective meaning to these new objects which formed a new, completely
shows his mechanistic view of the world (Keene 1987:647). Experiencing the rapid changes
in Japanese culture he must have felt like a small part of a machine that he did not control. He
sensed mechanisms that control human beings everywhere and tries to explain the world
through them.
Just like many other writers of that time Yokomitsu was trapped in the dilemma of
Japanese Modernity (Ellis 1999:723) and therefore had to define his position between
traditional and modern which resulted in taking a satiric position at first. This satiric position
is noticeable in many of Yokomitsus works like for example in The Trial of Marx
(Marukusu no shimpan, 1923) in which a judge who is absorbed with the Marxist theories he
read tries to solve a trial through projecting these theories onto the assumed motive of the
accused. When the judge thinks over it again he realizes that he almost delivered a false
3
verdict and feels guilty but in the end he blames the Marxist theories and not himself for this
fault. (Campbell 1972:29/30) Marxism also has the function of a mechanism in this story and
shows Yokomitsus skepticism about those theories which connect everything concerning
Another satiric example for the trivial, external factors is given in Napoleons
Ringworm (Naporeon to tamushi, 1926). Yokomitsu here evolves the theory that Napoleon
suffered from ringworm and went mad because of the itchiness. As the ringworm advances
across Napoleons belly, his armies advance across the plains and his conquests were
Yokomitsus satiric position later changed to a more severe view of the changes of
modernity. Between 1928 and 1931 he published his full-length novel Shanghai in segments
in which he depicts Shanghai as an alsmost unhuman city. To Yokomitsu the city of Shanghai
was a foretaste of the world to come (Keene 1987:656) and he stressed this image through
his descriptive passages as well as his characters that are left one-dimensional and superficial.
(Keene 1987:655-657) This novel also gives a foretaste of Yokomitsus changing feelings
towards Japan as he describes China as inferior to Japan and thus follows the increasing
In 1930 Yokomitsus masterpiece The Machine (Kikai) was published and marked a
change in his style. He abandoned the short-sentenced, jumping New Sensationalist style and
now wrote in a dense and flexible way. (Keene 1987:658) In this story Yokomitsus
mechanistic views get very clear and point at his feelings about modernity. From the
beginning of the story he describes the main characters work in a small plate factory as
unpleasant and the main character as otherwise useless. He thereby already gives a
negative image of factory work which is an achievement of modernization and one gets the
impression that the main character itself functions like a machine. This impression gets
reinforced as the story moves on and the main character says: Violence was the only thing
4
that worked with a person like me. Further he and his collegues had to work virtually
without sleep. All these points stress the inhumanity brought by modernization.
As the main character learns more about chemicals he says, I learned to see delicate
organic movements in inorganic substances. The discovery that in the tiniest things a law, a
spiritualization of the machine continues throughout the story and serves as the reason for
the quarrels between the workers as well as the death of one them in the end. It is said that
some invisible machine was constantly measuring us all, as if it understood everything that
went on, and was pushing us according to the results of its measurements. The machine is
infallible as well as a sharp menace. Like Keene said, the machine is a symbol of fate
(Keene 1987:660) and if we apply it on Yokomitsus view of the world, it can also be seen in
the same sense as his description of Shanghai resulting in his opinion of modernization.
4 Conclusion
Overall, Yokomitsus works show kind of a resignation. Without local roots and facing the
loss of long established customs that was filled with foreign thoughts he transferred his
insecurity into a sense of trivial mechanisms all his works have in common.
The only thing Yokomitsu could rely on was being Japanese which became the main topic
of his later works. His understanding of the Japanese spirit as superior to other nationalities
was already foreshadowed in Shanghai and became visible in his works after 1934.
On one hand, he was fascinated by foreign things and ideas and even traveled to Europe to
learn more about it, but on the other hand, they always stayed foreign to him. While he was
able to turn them into a modern style of literature at the beginning of his career, this
literature and can be seen as an example for the cultural struggle Japan had to undergo during
the last 140 years in search for a japanese postion between tradition and modernity.
5
5 Bibliography
Keene, Donald (1987): Dawn to the West: Japanese Literature of the Modern Era. Holt, New
York
Ellis, Toshiko (1999): The Japanese Avant-Garde of the 1920s: The Poetic Struggle with the
Dilemma of the Modern. In: Poetics Today, Vol. 20, No. 4. (Winter, 1999), pp. 723-741
Campbell, Alan (1972): The Historical Satires of Yokomitsu Riichi. In: The Journal of the
Association of Teachers of Japanese, Vol. 8, No. 1, Tenth Anniversary Issue.
(Nov., 1972), pp. 26-33.