Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.0
Conventional design
CSR
1.5
Shorten overhang length
LP Optimized bearing span HP
1.0
231 410 231
Region A - Level
0.5 Analysis sufficient
0.0
0 20 40 60 80
Average gas density [kg/m3]
for high pressure application
Fig. 4 Screening criteria
Fig. 2 Comparison of rotor design
0.31
0.3 0.28
Stability
analysis results show that the machine with the
A0.1
Improved Q0/QA2 squeeze film damper performs better than the one
0.2
0.13
with only the tilting pad journal bearing.
0.17
0.1 Tilting Pad Journal Bearings A rotor hammering test was conducted in free-free
(Conventional Type)
mode to verify the appropriateness of the rotor model
0
QA 2QA Q0 0.03 used for the analysis. As shown in Table 2, all the
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
0.1 results from the first to the third mode indicate that
Cross-coupled stiffness Q [kN/mm]
the differences between the calculated values and
Fig. 5 Rotor stability analysis
measured values are within 3%, verifying sufficient
prediction accuracy. As shown in Fig. 6, the calculated
Table 2 Rotor hammering test characteristic vibration modes match well with the
measured values, verifying the appropriateness of the
Eigenvalue (Hz) calculation model.
(free-free)
(LP impeller) Gear center (HP impeller) HP stage suct. press. (MPa) 5.379 5.199 5.262 5.432
Fig. 6 Comparison of mode shape HP stage disch. press. (MPa) 8.010 8.081 8.055 7.790
20 20
Amplitude (m)
Amplitude (m)
15 MCS: 27,900 (rpm) 15 Supply oil temp.: 55 ()
465Hz
MCS: 27,900 (rpm) Test gas : Argon
10 465 (Hz) Impeller : 174PH
10
No asynchronous vibration
5 Stable enough No asynchronous vibration
5
0
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 0
Frequency (Hz) 0 200 400 600 800 1,000
Frequency (Hz)
Fig. 7 FFT analysis of shaft vibration
Fig. 9 Test result of SFD bearing
that the test compressor can safely be run at the
specified pressure. (molecular mass = 39.948) for the test gas and the
In addition, temperatures were measured for the vibration behavior was observed. The evaluated
entire journal bearing pad. The measured maximum destabilizing fluid force at 80Bar of discharge
of 70 is well within the standard values of Kobe pressure using argon gas corresponds to an
Steel. approximately 13% increase in destabilizing force as
against the same discharge pressure predicted by
4. Rotor destabilization test Equation (1) (a 15% average increase in gas density)
when the original gas (nitrogen) was used.
To define the limit at which the rotor destabilizes, The frequency analysis of shaft vibration revealed
a test was conducted to determine the vibration no significant asynchronous vibration at a supply oil
behavior under decreased rotor stability and temperature of 43(design temperature) and no
increased destabilizating fluid force. An impeller impairment of rotor stability. Raising the supply oil
made of stainless steel was adopted to increase the temperature to 55, however, causes an asynchronous
added mass. A load test was conducted using argon vibration as shown in Fig. 8.
On the other hand, the substitution of an SFD for
the bearing caused no significant asynchronous
30
Supply oil temp.: 43 () vibration even in the case where the bearing caused
Test gas : Argon an asynchronous vibration (Fig. 9), verifying the
Impeller : 174PH improvement in stability due to the SFD.
Amplitude (m)
20
10 MCS: 27,900 (rpm) The gas thrust force was measured during the load
465 (Hz)
test to collect the data useful for high load design.
The force was measured by the load cells embedded
0
0 200 400 600 800 1,000
behind the four pads of the thrust surfaces on the
Frequency (Hz) loaded side and unloaded side of the thrust bearing
for the low-speed shaft. The force is transmitted from
30 the pinion shaft to the low-speed shaft via a rider ring
Supply oil temp.: 55 () (thrust collar). Verification tests were conducted
Test gas : Argon before the actual load test. The thrust force was
Impeller : 174PH
Asynchronous evaluated by taking the average of the values
Amplitude (m)
20 vibration
measured at the four points. Fig. 10 shows the
bearing and load cells used for the test.
Table 4 summarizes the average values of the
10
measured loads on the four pads which represent the
trust force at 80Bar which is in the vicinity of the
maximum load. The measured values fall within 10%
0
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 of the thrust force (17.1kN) calculated on the basis of
Frequency (Hz) Kobe Steel's design method. The results verify the
Fig. 8 Results of destabilization test appropriateness of the calculated value.