Professional Documents
Culture Documents
October, 2016.
Human right and labor issues in Investment Treaties
Abstract
Today foreign direct investment (FDI) has become one of the ways of
development to countries economy. To this end, to attract the flow of
investors to their country one of the means or the tool of competition among
countries is Bilateral Investment treaties (BITs).This is done by making low
standard of Human Right and labor Right practices in their BITs by offering
broad and legally enforceable protection to investors.
Thus, in one hand BITs with low standard of human Right and labor right
practices favored in attracting more investors to poor countries as some
writers argue, and on the other hand, others oppose that as it worsens
human right and labor right of the citizens.
In this paper the writer analyzes the existing literature review on documents
written by scholars and previous writers on this debatable issue, and finally
reached to the findings that BITs with low standards of Human Right and
labor rights Worsens human Right and labor right of the citizens. At the end,
the writer recommended the possible suggestion to the identified problem.
1
Acknowledgement
Thanks to Almighty God! Next, my appreciation goes to Instructor
Muhammed kebe, who instructed me in this course in an attractable manner
and gave such an assignment which helps me to further explore and widen
my understanding in seminar course.
2
Acronyms
FDI----------Foreign Direct Investment
EU-------------European Union
3
Table of contents
Contents
Human right and labor issues in Investment Treaties.................................................1
Abstract...................................................................................................................... 1
Acknowledgement...................................................................................................... 2
Acronyms.................................................................................................................... 3
Table of contents........................................................................................................ 4
CHAPTER ONE............................................................................................................. 5
1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 5
1.1. What are Human Rights?...............................................................................6
1.2. What is Labor Right?...................................................................................... 6
2.3. What are Investment Treaties?.........................................................................7
CHAPTER TWO............................................................................................................ 8
1. THEORETICAL LITRETURE REVIEW.......................................................................8
1.1. Human right and Labor right Issues in Investment Treaties...........................8
2.2......................................................................................................................... 11
CHAPTER THREE....................................................................................................... 11
3. Conclusion and Recommendations....................................................................11
3.1. Conclusion.................................................................................................... 11
3.2. Recommendations.......................................................................................... 12
References................................................................................................................ 13
4
CHAPTER ONE
1. INTRODUCTION
The concern of Human Right and Labor issues in investment treaties are
becoming a crucial issue for countries to strike the balance between; in
attracting Foreign Direct Investment to be the source of capital and as one of
the base for sustainable development to one country in one hand, and to
protect the human Right and labor right of countries citizens on the other
hand.
5
1.1. What are Human Rights?
Human rights are refers to the concept of human beings as having universal
rights, or status, regardless of legal jurisdiction or other localizing factors,
such as ethnicity and nationality. In the other hand, human rights are moral
principles or norms that describe certain standards of human behavior, and
1
are regularly protected as legal rights in national and international law.
They are commonly understood as inalienable fundamental rights to which a
person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being, and
which are inherent in all human beings regardless of their nation, location,
language, religion, ethnic origin or any other status.2 They are applicable
everywhere and at every time in the sense of being universal, and they are
egalitarian in the sense of being the same for everyone. They should not be
taken away except as a result of due process based on specific
circumstances, and require freedom from unlawful imprisonment, torture,
and execution.
2 Id.
6
industrial action to increase their members right. 4 These rights include a
right to work in a job freely chosen, a right to fair working conditions, which
may encompass issues as diverse as a just wage or protection of privacy; a
right to be protected from arbitrary and unjustified dismissal; a right to
belong to and be represented by a trade union and a right to strike.
6 Id.
7 Id.
7
CHAPTER TWO
8
human trafficking, child enslavement, mortally hazardous conditions of work,
verbal and physical abuse, exhausting hours of work, nonpayment of wages,
etc. are common occurrences.9
8Robert M. Stern: International Labor Standards; ILO; WTO; Effects on Trade and Investment,August 19,
2011,pp. 1
9 Id.
10 Id.
11 Id.
12 Id.
9
assembly and association) and economic, social and cultural rights (right to join and form trade
unions, right to work, right to equal pay for equal work, right to education).13
The WTO charter establishes some of the terms limiting the use of
preferential trade agreements, there are no restrictions on conditionality
relating to labor standards and enforcement for countries invoking Article
XXIV or the Enabling Clause.15
13 OECD, 1996
14 OECD, 1996
16 Id.
10
(2) the right to organize and bargain collectively, (3) a prohibition on the use
of any form of forced or compulsory labor, (4) a minimum age for the
employment of children and (5) acceptable conditions of work with respect to
minimum wages, hours of work, and occupational safety and health.17
More terms have been included in the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) and the U.S. Trade Agreement with Jordan (2001). 18 Under the terms
of the Jordan-U.S. FTA, each country has the right to challenge the partners
protection of labor rights.
The ILO and the International Finance Corporation (IFC) jointly agreed to
extend Better Factories Cambodia into a global program in 2006. The ILO/IFC
Better Work Program, inaugurated in 2008, establishes labor standards in
eight areas: child labor, forced labor, freedom of association and collective
17 GSP Renewal Act of 1984, Pub. L. No. 98-573, 98 Stat. 3019 (1984).
18 Id.
19 Supra note 7.
20 Ibid.
11
bargaining, discrimination, contracts, compensation, occupational safety and
health, and work hours.21
A great deal of informal polemics has seen in the last two decades on
whether the global investment regime and, more specifically, BITs harm
human rights. Particularly human rights organizations are vocal about the
effect of BITs on governments policy autonomy to create social peace and
justice.22
BITs include both provisions that guarantee investor rights and mechanisms
for investors to legally enforce such provisions.23The key contention is that
BITs have the potential to harm human rights practices because they lock-in
conditions attractive to investors, both retrospectively and into the future. 24
This means, as many developing countries predominantly attract vertical FDI
and Compete for investment and Trade, BITs lock in the initial conditions
21 Id.
22 Forexample,humanrightsNGOsopposedtheMultilateralAgreementonInvestmentnegotiated
inthelate1990sbytheOECD(Peterson2009).NGOsalsoexpressconcerninindividual
BITsnegotiations,asforexampletheUKColombiaBITortheUSIndiaBIT.( CristinaBodea,
Fangjin Ye,
MichiganStateUniversity)
23 Evenifinvestorshaveextensivelegalprotection,statesstillbreakcontractswith
multinationalenterprises(Blake2013,AlleeandPeinhardt2011,Wellhausen2015)
24 Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs): The global Investment regime and Human
Rights.(cristina Bodea,Fangjin Ye, Michigan State University)
12
favorable to investors on issues ranging from environmental regulations to
labor standards and welfare spends.25
CHAPTER THREE
3. Conclusion and Recommendations
3.1. Conclusion
Currently Foreign direct investment (FDI) has become a key economic flow in
the global economy. Due to this, countries to achieve their pursuit of
development consider FDI as an important contributing factor. To this end
countries have ratified a large number of Bilateral Investment treaties (BITs).
On Bilateral Investment treaties there are different views, some argues that
BITs channel much needed capital to poor countries (Leo 2010). On the other
hand, others fear that the favorable treatment given to foreign investors
through BITs can worsen the environmental or human rights practices of
states (Peterson and Gray 2003).
But, as the findings and view of the writer of this term paper argument; due
to the broad and legally enforceable protection given to investors by bilateral
investment treaties worsens the Human rights practices of developing
countries. The reason is, despite the presence of emerging to include human
right and labor right provisions in BITs in some countries, most developing
countries BITs lock-in initial conditions attractive to investors that tend to be
linked to vertical investment flows and trade competition, and include low
human right standards and labor rights.
3.2. Recommendations
As the findings in the concluding section of the paper, the broad and legally
enforceable protection given to investors by bilateral investment treaties
worsens the Human rights practices of developing countries. Hence this is
25 Id
13
the cause of the problem; possible policy implications can be inferred and
recommended for government and policy makers of countries in order to
curb the problem or at least to minimize its negative impact. To this end, the
following are suggested possibilities;
The enactment of strong Human Rights and labor laws and
Regulations so as to be included in the BITs with its effective
enforcement mechanisms.
Creating awareness to citizens about human right and labor right to
ask and defend for his/her right.
Government should work with NGOs which work on human Right and
labor issues.
Investment decisions in human Right and labor right connected
issues should be weighted by the cost and benefit effects in the long
run effect, rather than only by short run effect.
Develop a continuous Human Right and Labor right issues
assessment and inspection to firms after establishment with in a
limited time.
References
1. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Available at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights [ accessed on October 19,2016]
2. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Available at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_rights [accessed on October 19,2016]
3. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Available
athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilateral_investment_treaty [ accessed on October
21,2016]
4. Robert M. Stern: International Labor Standards; ILO; WTO; Effects on Trade and
Investment, August 19, 2011,pp.1
5. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development( OECD, 1996)
6. Hoekman and zden (2005)
14
7. Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs): The global Investment regime and Human Rights.
(cristina Bodea,Fangjin Ye, Michigan State University)
15