Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
A. Dietary Energy
G. Grow-Finish Specifications
Diet Specifications for Optimum Lean Deposition: Gilts
Diet Specifications for Optimum Lean Deposition: Castrates
Adjusting Lysine-Calorie Specifications to Lean Content
Diet Specifications for Poor or No Lean Payment Markets
Matching Lysine Need to Different Growth Phases
Energy levels are expressed as Metabolizable Energy (ME) in this guide because it is the system most
commonly used in North and South America. The ME and Digestible Energy (DE) system is adequate for
describing available energy for simple diets (Corn-Soy) or for diets of young pigs. However, the Net
Energy (NE) system is a more accurate method of measuring the available energy when a more diverse set
of ingredients is used, including by-products for sows and finishing pigs. NE is in routine use by several
feed companies for this reason. Other groups have modified ME values for certain ingredients (eg., soya,
wheat midds) to reflect the effect of protein and fiber content on the ME/NE relationships. This guide
specifies energy as NRC ME, based on a simple diet type that is defined for each phase of production.
Nutrition specialists can then adapt the specified Lysine:ME relationships to suit their own system. Any
adjustments to dietary ME to take account of hot environmental temperature or when added fat is used in
the diet to improve feed efficiency, will require adjustment to the dietary lysine level to keep the
Lysine:ME ratio constant.
To obtain optimum performance, all essential amino acids must meet or exceed the amino acid requirement
for that particular type and level of production..
The NRC (1998) has defined the ideal balance of amino acids for each phase of production. This serves
as the basis for PIC recommendations. The amino acid levels are normally expressed in relation to the
level of lysine, since this is most likely to be the first limiting in the diet. Feed ingredients have different
amino acid digestibility coefficients. therefore, when formulating diets that are more complex than Corn-
Soy, it is recommended that true ileal digestible values are used in the formulation process
This guide specifies the l lysine requirement as a total value (shown as a T), which is satisfactory for Corn-
Soy formulations and also gives the true ileal digestible lysine (shown as a D), for more complex diets.
The pattern of amino acids is different for these methods as compared to the apparent ileal digestible
system. The suggested ratio of dietary amino acids for each phase is shown in Table B1. (NRC, 1998).
Table B. I. Amino Acid Balance for Formulations based on Total or True Ileal Digestible
Amino Acid Values.a,b
Correct gilt nutrition during development has a significant impact on the lifetime performance of the
breeding female.
Gilt development and management begins in the early stages of a gilts life and ends when the gilt
completes her first lactation.
Sow feeding is a phase feeding system, based on different diets and feed quantities according to the stage of
reproduction. (Table D.1.) Feeding involves a gestation diet and 1or2 lactation diets. A gilt lactation diet is
recommended for start-up herds. If it is possible to separate gilts from sows in the farrowing room and feed
a gilt lactation diet to the gilts only, this has been shown to be very beneficial in minimizing body weight
and tissue loss in the first lactation period. The pregnant sow feeding program requires feeding the proper
amount of diet to meet her energy needs expressed in kcals/day and then matching the other nutrient levels
in the diet to the amount fed, so that all other daily nutrient needs are met in g/day. The minimum amount
of energy and nutrient requirements is provided in Table D. 2. These amounts are determined by the net
maternal growth that needs to be achieved as shown in Table D. 3. Lactation is a physiologically
demanding process and all gilts and sows should be fed to meet their individual daily appetites to maximize
nutrient intake. Feeding to reclaim body reserves during the next gestation is also important.(Table D. 5.).
a
Assumes the NRC ME 1465 Kcal /lb for gestation and NRC ME 1485 Kcal /lb for lactation diets.
b
Feed level from delivery to pre-breed flush (10-14 days) depends on gilt entry weight. Consider full-feed if <250
lb bw (114 kg) or limit feed to about 5.0 lb/day (2.3 kg) if > 250 lb at delivery.
c
Minimum feed levels to reclaim body fat reserves are shown in Table D. 5. Objective is to reclaim body reserves
(fat, protein, bone minerals) by 60 days of gestation.
d
Average gestation length, 116 days.
Where possible gestation diets should be fed 2-3 times per day. Alternatively gestation should be substituted with
a lactation diet, especially where low feed intakes are experienced.
Nutrient specifications for gestation are presented in Table D.2. Energy and lysine needs are based on
suggested levels for growth in Table D. 3. Gilt specifications can be used when restocking units.
Specifications for whole herds are a compromise between needs for gilts and older sows. Gilts are
challenged to a greater extent during lactation than sows. Feed gilts 4.5-5.0 lb/day until day 90 of gestation
as this will allow for significant growth to prepare for the rigor of first lactation.
Gestation Gestation
Nutrient Unit Gilt Herd Nutrient Unit Gilt Herd
Net maternal wt. lb 75 45 NRC MEb Kcal/lb 1465 1465
Gain a
P2 fat at farrow mm 16-20 16-20 C. Protein % 14.0 13.5
Av. feed intake lb/day 4.5 4.9 C. Fiber % 4.5 4.5
Kg 2.14 2.25
NRC ME Kcal/da Calcium % 0.95 0.90
y 6886 7179
T Lysine g/day 12.3 12.0 T Phosphorus % 0.80 0.75
D Lysine g/day 10.2 10.0 Av Phosphorus % 0.43 0.40
Calcium g/day 19.4 20.0 Salt % 0.45 0.45
T Phosphorus g/day 16.3 16.7 T Lysinec % 0.60 0.54
Av Phosphorus g/day 8.8 8.9 D Lysine % 0.50 0.45
90 days to farrow T Methionine % 0.17 0.15
Feed intake lb/day 6.2 6.2 T Met+Cystine % 0.41 0.38
NRC ME Kcal/da 9156 9156 T Threonine % 0.46 0.43
y
T Lysine g/day 17 15.3 T Tryptophan % 0.12 0.11
D Lysine g/day 14.2 12.7 T. Isoleucine % 0.35 0.32
a
Net tissue growth by the sow declines with each parity. See Table D. 3..for suggested weight gains and feed levels.
b
NRC ME is based on a Corn-Soy diet with 15% wheat middlings.
c
T = total, D. = true illeal digestible. Formulate to either T or D, but not both.
Daily energy and lysine levels in Table D. 2 are minimums and assume proper body condition. Estimates
of nutrient requirement are driven by the amount needed for suggested net maternal weight gain by parity.
(Table D. 3.). Larger females require more energy for maintenance, but this increase is off-set by declining
net maternal weight gain.
Table D. 3. Energy and Lysine Needs for Gestation Maternal Weight Gain
Body Weight at Suggested Net Feed Intake, NRC ME T Lysine
Mating, lb. LITTER NO. Gain, lb lb/day Kcal/day g/day
280 1st 75 4.75 6959 11.6
330 2nd 55 5.0 7325 12.25
385 3rd 45 5.0 7325 12.25
420 4th 35 5.0 7325 12.25
440 5th 35 4.75 6959 11.6
450 6th 30 4.75 6959 11.6
460 7th 20 4.5 6593 11.0
Nutrient specifications for lactation are presented in Table D. 4. Daily NRC ME intake is the multiple of
the expected daily feed intake (based ona 10,000 sow herd) and the NRC ME content of a Corn-Soy diet.
The level of lysine for gilts is based on PIC USA research to optimize second litter-size (20 d lactation).
Table D. 6 was used to estimate Lysine needs for sows only. Two lactation diets are recommended when
stocking units and should be a consideration when designing new units. A single herd diet will increase
the potential loss of body protein in gilts, which may result in a second litter-size dip or plateau.
Lactation Lactation
Nutrient Unit Gilt Herd Nutrient Unit Gilt Herd
Net lactation wt. lb 30 25 NRC ME c Kcal/lb 1500 1500
loss
Lactation fat mm 2 2 C. Protein % 19.0 18.5
loss, max.
Litter growth lb/day 4.95 5.28 C. Fiber % 2 to 5 2 to 5
g/day 2250 2400
Av Feed Intake/ lb/day 11.0 12.5
day*
Kg/day 5.0 5.68 Calcium % 0.95 0.90
NRC ME a Kcal/da 16500 18750 T Phosphorus % 0.80 0.75
y
T Lysine b g/day 65 60 Av Phosphorus % 0.43 0.40
D Lysine g/day 54 49 Salt % 0.50 0.50
Calcium g/day 47 51 T Lysine % 1.25 1.05
T Phosphorus g/day 40 43 D Lysine % 1.08 0.87
Av Phosphorus g/day 21 23 T Methionine % 0.34 0.27
Salt g/day 25 28 T Met + Cystine % 0.64 0.51
T Threonine % 0.81 0.65
T Tryptophan % 0.25 0.20
T Valine % 1.06 0.90
T Isoleucine % 0.73 0.59
a
Assumes feed at about 85-90% energy balance with litter growth rates shown and 20 d lactation (1998 NRC
model).
b
The 60 g lysine/day average assumes that the sow feed intake is near adequate at 12.5 lb/day and that the gilt feed
intake is adequate at 11 lb/day for optimum second litter size.
c
NRC ME is based on the energy value of a Corn-Soy diet.
* Average feed intake over the suckling period and is not the maximum intake achieved within the period
The farm-specific lysine level for lactation depends on the actual litter growth rate and average lactation
feed intake by sows. The daily lysine requirement is driven strictly by rate of litter growth and this can
vary with health and thermal stress. This needs to be matched with the level of feed consumed. Table D.
6. can be used to derive farm-specific lysine needs. It is appropriate for sows, but not for gilts since a
higher lysine level is needed for gilts to maximize second litter size than is required to support milk
production (see Current Concepts for Feeding Prolific Sows).
Where possible the provision of a gilt lactation diet should be used; where this is not possible top- dressing
with a feed ingredient, such as extruded soybean, is recommended.
Table D. 6. Lactation Lysine Level Varies with Litter Growth and Sow Feed Intake
A lactation intake guide was developed from data obtained on a 10,000 sow commercial farm. It is
recommended as a guide and for use in monitoring farm specific lactation feed intake
(See Concepts for Feeding Prolific PIC Sows, for card and guidelines for use.)
Energy needs to support target weight gains in boars at stud are shown in Table E1and Figure E1). These
have been calculated and validated in AI studs and proven not to compromise semen volume, sperm
numbers or quality of sperm. (Technical memo 142.)
Very little information exists on which to base nutrient specifications for boars. Those given in
Table E2 are used by PIC USA and shown for reference only. Energy and amino acid levels are
based on limited University research.
Body Weight Body Weight Total Kcal Feed Intake Feed Intake
Lb kg NRC ME/day b lb/day kg/day
< 350 < 159 7200 5.0 2.3
350 159 7920 5.5 2.5
450 205 8640 6.0 2.7
550 250 9360 6.5 3.0
650 295 10440 7.25 3.3
750 341 11160 7.75 3.5
a
Adapted from PIC USA Technical M emo 142. Assumes ambient temperature of 62-65oF.
b
Based on a dietary energy density of NRC ME 1440 Kcal /lb.
0.7
0.6
Daily Gain, kg/day
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
PIC327 boars
0
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Age in Months
a
Adapted from PIC USA Technical Memo 142. 1 kg of gain = 2.2 lbs.
Nutrient Unit
Diet specifications are based on the
NRC ME Kcal/lb 1440
minimum feed levels shown in Table E1
C. Protein % 16 above. Vitamin and trace mineral levels
C. Fiber % 4.0-6.0 are presented in the final section for all
Linoleic Acid % 1.90 phases of production including the boar
Calcium % 0.85 stud. They are suggested levels only and
T Phosphorusb % 0.75 represent what PIC USA is doing
Av Phosphorusb % 0.40 presently. Almost no public domain
Salt % 0.50 research has been conducted on which to
T Lysineb % 0.75 base vitamin and trace mineral
D Lysineb % 0.62 fortification for optimum output of viable
T Lysine:ME g/Mcal 2.35 sperm.
T Methionine % 0.20
T Met + Cystine % 0.53
T Threonine % 0.62
T Tryptophan % 0.15
a
Amount / lb of complete diet assuming feed level in Table E1.
See Vitamin & trace mineral section for micro nutrient specifications.
b
T = total, Av = available, D = True ileal digestible.
Diets must be matched to body weight and the correct amount fed within each phase. Feeding 2 diets
simultaneously within a weaned group is advised through phase 2 for optimum growth and livability.
Typical weight variation at weaning means that feeding to the average pig weight will result in feeding the
diet that matches requirements for only 65-70% of the pigs (Table F2, footnote b). This will result in
increased variation in nursery end weight.
a
Average feed intake shown is for a 25-50 lb pig assuming pelleted feed. Add 5% for grind and mix diets.
b
Lactose or equivalent sugars. Sucrose can replace 50% Lactose after 5-7 days of feeding to induce appropriate
digestive enzyme secretion.
c
T = Total and D = True ileal digestible. The level of other amino acids were set using the NRC pattern in Table B
1 of the Amino acid pattern section.
d
Suggested levels for commercial production and good to high health. High health pigs can tolerate higher levels of
soybean meal (e.g. 16-25lb,30% ; 25-50lb,32%)
An example feed budget is shown in Table F2 for three weaning ages. The budgeted amount of feed per
phase is driven by the feed:gain data in Table F1. The percentage of pigs that are expected to be smaller
than the average is also considered (Table F2, footnote b). A change in feed:gain will result if the dietary
energy density is different from that shown in Table F1. This is particularly true for the 25-50 lb phaseand
then the budgeted amount must be changed to reflect the difference.
Diet Phase: Lb
Early Wean 8-12 1.8 0.5 0
Phase 1 12-15 4.5 4.5 4.5
Phase 2 15-25 12 12 12
Phase 3 25-50 40 40 40
The information shown in Figure F1 is provided to facilitate the nutritionist in adjusting the lysine levels to
feeding phases that are different than those specified in Table F1.
Figure F1
5
4.95
4.8
4.66
4.6
4.54
4.4
g Lysine/Mcal ME
4.2 4.22
4 4
3.85
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
3
x 8 12 16 24 40 48
Nutrient specifications for grow-finish pigs are in Tables G1 andG2 are for lean growth optimization.
Those in Table G3 are suggested for markets with little or no lean merit payment. Lysine specifications for
phas es other than those shown can be derived from Figure G1. Lysinecalorie ratios are based on
extensive internal research with PIC USA terminal progeny of C-22 females x 300-400 series sires:
Females, 16 mm P2 (19 FOM) and 54% lean; Castrates, 19 mm P2 (22 FOM) and 52.5% lean.
Specifications have been validated in a commercial system (54,000 sows). Performance was determined
under conditions of high health, thermo -neutral environment and with Corn -Soy diets.
Lysine specifications are presented as grams per Mcal of NRC ME. Formulating diets of growing pigs to
grams of lysine/day can be misleading (discussed in Grow-Finish Technical Update). The dietary energy
level used in the recommendations is NRC ME 1500 Kcal /lb since it approximates to a Corn-Soy diet.
Actual dietary energy levels require a number of considerations that are specific to market and environment
(see Usry et al., 1997). The available phosphorus curve (g Av. P/Mcal NRC ME) is higher than the NRC
for nursery and especially for grow-finish phases because levels have not proven adequate to withstand the
force imposed on bones during stunning in commercial plants (as compared to University Labs).
Phase of Growth, lb
Item 50-70 70-90 90-150 150-210 210-260
Growth rate lb/day 1.63 1.73 1.81 1.94 1.81
Feed Intake lb/day 2.92 3.51 4.24 5.70 5.96
Feed:Gain Ratio 1.78 2.03 2.33 2.94 3.29
NRC ME:Gain Kcal/lb 2965 3120 3815 4500 5060
NRC ME Kcal/lb 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500
T Lysineb % 1.21 1.10 0.96 0.88 0.72
D Lysineb % 1.13 0.97 0.85 0.79 0.64
T Lysine : ME g/Mcal 3.66 3.32 2.90 2.68 2.18
T Methionine % 0.34 0.30 0.26 0.24 0.19
T Met + Cystine % 0.72 0.62 0.56 0.52 0.43
T Threonine % 0.79 0.68 0.62 0.57 0.43
T Tryptophan % 0.22 0.19 0.16 0.15 0.12
T Valine % 0.86 0.75 0.65 0.60 0.49
T Isoleucine % 0.70 0.60 0.54 0.50 0.40
Calcium % 0.90 0.72 0.63 0.61 0.56
TPhosphorus % 0.70 0.62 0.58 0.56 0.51
Av Phosphorus c % 0.40 0.34 0.30 0.28 0.22
Av Phos: ME g/Mcal 1.10 1.03 0.91 0.84 0.67
Added Salt % 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.30
a
Expected growth and suggested nutrient levels for high health and thermal neutral conditions. Lysine
specifications are based on a series of trials leading to curve validation studies: Technical Memos 160 and 183
and PIC USA Experiment 9611. ME/lb gain is based on Technical Memos 160, 166.
b
T = Total and D = True ileal digestible value. The level of other amino acids were set using the NRC pattern in
Table 1 of the Amino acid pattern section.
c
Av Phosphorus is 0.26% for maximum bone strength at 210-260 lb for the pigs going into multiplication.
The performance differences between sexes are based on the recommendations below and should not be
greater than 0.11 lb/day ADG, 0.06 feed:gain and 3 mm P2. The cost of live weight gain should be
virtually identical with the profit difference being due to lean merit.
Lysine:ME relationships in Tables G1 and G2 are appropriate for growth rates of 1.62-1.85 lb/day because
the body protein:lipid ratio does not vary enough to justify different specifications. Dietary ME assumes a
Corn-Soy based ration without any fat supplementation. The dietary lysine percentage would need to be
adjusted if > 3% fat is added to keep the Lysine:ME constant. Lysine needs would be less than shown in
situations such as, immune stress, reducing lean deposition (could increase P2 fat depth by 3 mm) and for
commercial products with greater genetic lag (could increase P2 fat by 3 mm). Profit optimization may
also require a lower lysine level even though lean content is compromised. The PIC growth model and
experimental research suggests the following relationship, which is applied to a situation of slow genetic
improvement.
Assume. Lag induced increase in P2 fat depth by 3 mm compared to PIC USA products.
Decrease Lysine:ME specifications in Tables G1andG2 by 8% from 50-160 lb and by 10% from 160-260
lb for each 3 mm increase in fat depth. Set other amino acids to the balance shown in the Ideal amino acid
pattern section (Illustrated in the Grow-Finish Technical Update).
Information in figure is provided to facilitate the nutritionist in adjusting the lysine levels to feeding phases
that are different than those specified in Tables G1andG2 (see also Grow-Finish Technical Update).
Figure G1
Gilts Barrows
40
Matching3.4
3.4
Lysine Needs to Different Growth Phases
60
80
3.8 2.9 2.65
g Lysine/ Mcal ME
100
3.6
120
3.4 2.76 2.45
3.2
140 Gilts x
1603 2.57 2.3 Barrows y
2.8 Poly. (Gilts x)
180
2.6
200
2.4 2.39 2.25
2.2
220
2402 2.2 2.2
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
260 2.2
Barrows 3.85 3.32 2.8 2.5 2.09
y
Gilts x 3.85 3.32 2.9 2.68 2.18
Gilts x Barrows y Body Weight, lbs
40 3.85 3.85 40
PIC USA recommendations were established after extensive comparison with Universities and major
nutrition groups. A systematic allowance was made in relation to the NRC recognizing that their
information is based on studies under nearly ideal conditions.
PIC USA recommendations were established after extensive comparison with University and major
nutrition groups. A systematic allowance was made relative to the NRC
micronutrient recommendations for vitamins D and biotin are contractual for multiplication. Other
micronutrients are recommended minimums. Levels shown assume micronutrient additions and give no
credit for ingredient content.
PIC USA Technical Memo 142. 1996. Impact of dietary energy intake on sperm output by PIC 327 and
PIC 427 boars.
PIC USA Technical Memo 160. 1997. Comparison of two dietary lysine standards for growing PIC pigs:
PIC USA vs University of Illinois recommendations.
PIC USA Technical Memo 166. 1997. Response to three lysine regimens by PIC 406 progeny.
PIC USA Technical Memo 171. 1997. Amino acid requirements of the lactating sow: Literature Review.
Adapted and improved from K. Touchette MS Thesis, U.MO.
PIC USA Technical Memo 183. 1997. Dietary lysine curve that optimizes lean growth and profit for PIC
427 progeny.
PIC USA Experiment 9611. Lysine dose response curves for heavy PIC pigs (210-260 lbs) reared in a hot
versus thermo -neutral environment.
PIC USA Nutrition Technical Update. 1999. Concepts for feeding the Grow-Finish PIC pig.
PIC USA Nutrition Technical Update. 1999. Concepts for feeding prolific PIC sows.
Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 1998. National Research Council (10th Edition). National Academy
Press. 2101 Constitution Ave., NW. Washington, D.C. 20418.
Optimizing energy formulation for finishing swine. 1997. J. Usry, R.G. Campbell and D. Burnham. Proc.
Carolina Swine Nutrition Conference, Raleigh NC.
DISCLAIMER. Performance data shown in Nutrient specification tables were obtained in Commercial settings and
under conditions of high health, thermo-neutral temperature and good management. They are not guaranteed
levels of performance. A competent Nutritionist should adapt suggested Nutrient levels to specific conditions.
These concepts are discussed in greater detail in Nutrition Technical Updates for Sows, Nursery pigs and Grow-
Finish pigs.