Professional Documents
Culture Documents
27-30
Hathaway Roofing is one of the largest metal roofing and cladding companies in the UK.
Starting in early 1998 they undertook a lean transformation of their manufacturing
processes that was substantially self-financing and improved factory productivity by around
35%. Since the conclusion of the physical and process changes in mid 1999, a more subtle
change has occurred in the culture of the organisation that has in turn supported further
improvements in results.
Hathaway is a vertically integrated roofing company – it takes sheet steel and other raw
materials in and installs roofs, walls, windows and gutters on construction sites – it has
recently won the contract for the roof of Terminal 5 at Heathrow. The physical change at
Hathaway was focussed on the factory –
the results were felt throughout the Goods packing welding
inwards
company and on customer sites. and
finished
The way we were goods
loading quality
Stores
bay control and
In 1998 the 3300m2 factory was holding bay
functionally organised with 60-65% of
insula
the space devoted to storage and -tion
circulation to allow forklift trucks to windows
move large sheets around the plant.
The big pressing, punching, bending cutting
and cutting machines were all in a row
punching
against a wall at one end of the
factory. A number of workbenches gutters pressing
were in front of them so that whatever fabrication
had just been cut, pressed, bent and bending
punched could be assembled.
Stretching off to the other end of the
factory were storage racks. They were Engineering doors
workshop
full of work-in-progress kits and an Production
Figure 1: Hathaway before
office
enormous array of materials that were
waiting for jobs or had been left over raw material work in progress finished goods
from jobs (or were just there because
Figure 0: Hathaway before
they were a good buy at one time or
other). Even the wide aisles were often
blocked by work in progress because of the many physical bottlenecks in the process.
Smaller pieces of equipment were scattered around the site.
Because the factory’s machines — great and small — were all used at various times by
many different people for every kind of job, there was no overall logic to their placement.
The factory turnover in 1998 was ~£3m and employed 50 staff. The company was doing
relatively well at the time.
Fixing it
A lean transformation is based around the application of lean thinking and the
underpinning principles [see box] to all the activities and processes in the organisation.
1
Jim Womack and Dan Jones (1996) Lean Thinking Touchstone
2
This project is part financed by the European Community, European Regional Development
3
With obvious exceptions like whiskey, Christmas pudding and some cheeses, storage, delay and movement
within the production process create no value for the customer. They only add cost to the producer.
agreed to present the following to operators and other stakeholders for criticism and
feedback:
• four dedicated production cells with their own goods inwards, set of consecutively
integrated transformations, packing and shipping area and access to waiting
delivery lorries;
• dedicated machines and equipment for each production cell
• dedicated team of operators for each cell
• Operators trained in machine changeover, set-up and maintenance;
• Just-in-time delivery of materials
• Co-location of production control and maintenance at the heart of production
activities.
Selling the idea
Although staff had been informed that Rubicon would be doing some investigations at the
plant, lean wasn’t explained to them prior to the value stream mapping and plant layout
meetings. This was done in four groups in July 1998 and at the same time the Factory
Manager presented the new layout and production ideas. Each group spent half a day with
a Rubicon consultant and their managers discussing their questions, concerns and the
implications of such a major change. All the issues were listed as they arose — many of
which were practical problems seen from the operators’ perspectives — so that they could
be worked through.
As time progressed, attitudes among the work force changed from scepticism to
enthusiasm, and they began to generate their own ideas for improvements — mostly small
practical things which would make their lives easier, as well as the work more efficient.
Following these initial presentations and discussions, cell teams were defined and each
chose a spokesperson. These Spokesmen met with their managers every fortnight to report
on team progress with ideas and proposals. By October the stage was set, many of the
plant transformations were already
well underway and everyone was on Goods bits and
pieces welding
board for change. inwards
and
stores
A miraculous transformation Fabrications
stores area. The rest of the factory is raw material work in progress finished goods
The small Bits & Pieces fifth cell makes ‘orphan’ products that were lost or damaged on
site, forgotten at design stage or changed by the customer.
Figure 2: Hathaway Roofing early in the transformation - access road to the west side
of the site under construction, shipping dock still open
Figure 3: Hathaway Roofing after the transformation - factory on the left and design
and admin offices in the U-shaped building on the right
What is particularly striking is the layout and efficiency of the Glazing line. It is now a fully
integrated door, window and curtain-wall manufacturing cell. Once considered
experimental and squeezed into two corners of the plant, it is now able to offer a new
product range to customers and make a substantial contribution to the company.
On the glazing line as elsewhere in the factory, materials and parts are now moved by cell
team members themselves on specially designed push trolleys and roller lines, rather than
forklifts. Most work is done at a standard height so that materials can flow on rollers from
one operation to the next. There is a small packing area at the end of the line so that the
team can pack their own product in reusable boxes and stillages that allow components to
be moved to position on site and removed in installation order.
Increased manufacturing efficiencies and capacities, jobs can now be planned so that they
rarely compete with each other and can therefore be
processed to completion without stops and starts. This Instant improvement
has been greatly facilitated by a production control
system that focuses on completing jobs on a first-in- When an assembler in the Glazing cell
realised how much time and energy it
first-out basis. took to turn a large window frame
Equipment set-up and maintenance time has been round so that he could work on each
edge, he went to his manager with a
greatly reduced because the cell teams are now solution. Together they designed it
trained to be much more engaged in their own with a craftsman in the Fabrications
change-overs, set-ups and routine machine cell. Two hours later the new table
maintenance — therefore freeing the engineering was in place and the assembler was
easily turning his window frames.
team to concentrate on major breakdowns and
projects; a new job ticketing method clearly lists what
is needed for a complete job — so that the set of transformations required for each job can
be seen at a glance and quickly set up by the cell team.
Although some of these innovations were discussed in the planning phase, many of them —
and many more refinements — came from operator team meetings, helped by the practice
of noting anything that impedes a process. Now the drive for improvement is so strong,
that sometimes innovations are put together on the spot, because someone has highlighted
a problem [see box].
Bringing Hathaway operators into the process was vital. Hathaway Production Director,
Derek Mitchell, says “We were set in our ways. We needed Rubicon to start the ideas
flowing, but we also needed them to help us — all of us together — step back from a
process we had become so familiar with and take the time to talk about what we were
doing and how we could do it better. I’d say communication was the big change. Then,
because we know how to make things, we just made all the other changes.”
Results
Before(1998) After (1999) Now (2003)
Inventory £300K £100K 75K
Lead times 4 weeks 3 days ??
Machine set-up 3 hours 30 minutes ??
Productivity index 100 135 ??
2
Storage & circulation area ~2000m ~?? ~??
The factory is now able to deliver to site just in time, just what is needed. This reduces
the likelihood of damage on site and increases the profitability of the overall job.
Rather than laying people off, the increased productivity has enabled the factory to both
reduce overtime and bring back in-house some activities that had been outsourced.
Operatives share in the increased profitability of the plant.
Hathaway today
Four years on, the changes are still working and there has been another subtler and
altogether more important change in the factory. A culture of continual improvement
exists. Back in 1999 continual improvement was still very much a conscious competence,
managers and operatives had to work at it to make it happen. Now it is just there. Lean
thinking is replacing other ways of thinking and continual improvement is the norm.
Each cell now has its own information board. Among other things this details who is skilled
to work in that cell. Many staff have learnt how to contribute to activities in all the cells
so that there is enormous flexibility in the factory.