Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Grace Apiafi
HED 044
13 February 2017
The death penalty is a capital punishment where one is killed because of the crime they
committed. There are currently 31 states in America that allows death penalty. A popular debate
about the death penalty is if it is moral to kill someone based on a crime they committed. In the
eyes of functionalism, there are positives and negatives of having the death penalty.
keep a state of balance and harmony as a whole. There is the idea that people need to be
regulated for everyones benefit, so in the functionalist point of view, the death penalty would be
fair for the people who disturbs the harmony of society. The death penalty would be how social
structures meet social needs due to the fact that it is a law that can protect the citizens and would
allow them not to worry about their safety. Functionalism is heavily based off the ideas from a
man named Emile Durkheim who was the first ever Professor of Sociology. Durkheim
believed that there was a social structure and it was made out of norms. He also believed that
individuals are selfish and that they had to be put in order. The death penalty supports
Durkheims idea as to put people who are dangerous and selfish in order as they are not allowed
any outside contact and are isolated. It also supports Durkheims ideas due to the fact that the
norm is that no one should commit heinous crimes as that is a social norm that is in place.
In the functionalist perspective, there are many positives of the death penalty. In the
functionalist perspective, they mostly would want to know what the benefits that the death
2
penalty to society are. Some examples are how it could eliminate violence, gives a greater sense
of security for the population and how society can get rid of criminals from returning to society
or preventing others from committing heinous crimes- at using the death penalty as a crime
deterrent. Using the death penalty as a crime deterrent would benefit to society. According to
...each execution carried out is correlated with about 74 fewer murders the following year...
(Michael Summers, PhD, MBA, 2007) this study showed that when a criminal who committed a
heinous and beyond wrong crime was executed, there were less people committing that crime the
next year. This shows that the death penalty works when to comes to preventing people from
committing crimes, therefore making it a safer environment for society. Another person to speak
on this advantage of the death penalty was Hashem Dezhbakhsh, PhD, and Joanna Shepherd,
PhD who stated in their study "The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: Evidence from a
'Judicial Experiment'" that, Each execution results, on average, in eighteen fewer murders with
a margin of error of plus or minus ten. There are more many studies proving that the death
There are still downsides about the death penalty in a functionalist point of view. The
goal of functionalism is to ensure the safety and norms of a society and to keep a society as a
whole. However, death penalty critics deemed it as morally wrong and that it adds more
violence. It also goes against the fact that it fails to ensure the safety of a citizen and that it
implies that a norm allows people to kill others. Another downside about the death penalty is that
killing someone costs more than actually feeding and containing the inmate. The drugs used in
the lethal injection and other expenses related to the execution are more costly(Future of
working, 2016). The death penalty can cause guilt and depression after ending the prisoners life.
3
Lastly, if the prisoner is found innocent after being executed, this could lead to societys lost of
trust towards the government and others. All in all, these downsides go against what a
whole.
Though there are many studies proving that there is positives to having the death penalty
we believe that the death penalty is unnecessary and that it is harmful to society. We feel as if the
death penalty is inhuman and sends a hypocritical message. Accountability for crimes is of
course very important, but killing someone because they kill someone sends a negative and
wrong message. Society needs to move away from the eye for an eye belief because looking
historically, that mindset only causes more crime. Functionalism relates to the death penalty due
to the fact that it, in a way, helps keep society safe and as a whole, but there are other ways to
keep and make society a safer place. Would you condemn a person to death just for a crime they
did even if they were a family member or someone you loved just because society tells you that
it is the best measure? Also, will you just go along with societal norms even though you know
Cited Sources
futureofworking.com/10-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-the-death-penalty/.
www.cnn.com/2013/07/19/us/death-penalty-fast-facts/.
Does the Death Penalty Deter Crime? - Death Penalty - ProCon.org. (n.d.). Retrieved
http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=000983.
www.boundless.com/sociology/textbooks/boundless-sociology-textbook/sociology-1/the
oretical-perspectives-in-sociology-24/the-functionalist-perspective-155-3284/.
The Functionalist Perspective Class Notes for A Level Sociology (Year 2).ReviseSociology,
Messerli, J. (n.d.). Death Penalty (Pros & Cons, Arguments For and Against,
http://www.balancedpolitics.org/death_penalty.htm.
Swisher, Tori. "Death Penalty." Prezi. N.p., 3 Dec. 2013. Web. 15 Feb. 2017.