Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bambalapitya flats
By C. A. Chandraprema-February 16, 2017,
One of the main concerns raised in that article was the possibility
that the project promoter was trying to raise money by pledging
the Bambalapitiya land as collateral. With no proper financial
commitment from Engineering Projects India Ltd, there was no
one to finance the project. Following this expose, the Chairman of
the Project Steering Committee of the Bambalapitiya flats
redevelopment project at the Ministry of Housing and
Construction wrote to Prashanth Koorpathi of UTL Global Projects
Pte Ltd on 3 February 2017, drawing his attention to the questions
raised by The Island and requesting answers. Prashanth Koorapati
of UTL Global Projects Pvt Ltd now signing as a Director of City
Square Projects Pvt Ltd, wrote back to the Chairman of the Project
Steering Committee on 6 February 2017 pointing out that:
b) UTL Global Projects Pte Ltd owns City Square Projects Pvt Ltd
through its holding company named Centennial Holdings Pte Ltd
Singapore.
Allegations confirmed
In this letter Koorapati of UTL Global Projects Pvt Ltd has, in effect,
admitted that Engineering Projects India Ltd is not a part of City
Square Projects Pvt Ltd. According to the requirements of the BOI,
both UTL Global Projects Pte Ltd and Engineering Projects India
Ltd should have been the joint owners of City Square Projects Pvt
Ltd, the locally registered company, to which the Bambalapitiya
land will be transferred on a 99-year lease. That this requirement
has not been fulfilled is a clear violation of BOI rules. This letter
also reveals that Engineering Projects India Ltd which is an Indian
state owned entity has not yet got the required permission for this
project from the relevant Indian governmental agencies including
the Indian cabinet and the Reserve Bank of India.
The BOI agreement that was signed on 22 June 2016 said that the
project would be a joint venture between UTL Global Projects Pte
Ltd and Engineering Projects India Ltd. Even the agreement that is
to be signed between City Square Projects (Pvt) Ltd and the NHDA
is based on the premise that UTL Global Projects Pte Ltd and
Engineering Projects India Ltd had jointly formed City Square
(Pvt.) Ltd. Now, Koorpathi of UTL Global Projects Pte Ltd has
admitted in his letter that City Square Projects (Pvt) Ltd is a wholly
owned subsidiary of UTL Global Projects Pte Ltd with Engineering
Projects India Ltd not being a part of it.
It should be borne in mind that UTL Global Projects Pte Ltd, is just
three members of the same family of Indian nationals Koorapati
Premalatha Rani, Meena Pooja and Prashanth Koorapati; with no
background in construction or real estate development or the
financial resources to be able to handle a project of this nature. It
is to a subsidiary wholly owned by them that the Bambalapitiya
land is to be transferred. The claim put forward now is that even
though Engineering Projects India Ltd does not have a consortium
agreement with UTL Global Projects Pte Ltd, they do have an
agreement with its wholly owned subsidiary City Square Projects
(Pvt) Ltd. Firstly, that is procedurally wrong. The consortium
agreement should be between UTL Global Projects Pte Ltd and
Engineering Projects India not between Engineering Projects India
Ltd and City Square (Pvt.) Ltd.
The fact that Koorpathi has sent only a redacted version of the
agreement between Engineering Projects India Ltd and City
Square Projects (Pvt) Ltd to the Project Steering Committee
claiming that the rest of it was highly confidential points to
another bid to mislead and deceive the government of Sri Lanka.
From this redacted version, Koorpathi has excluded the most
important part which gives details of the financial commitment
made by Engineering Projects India Ltd to this project. In his letter
of 6 February 2017, Koorpathi has said that Engineering Projects
India Ltd will take up equity in City Square Projects Pvt Ltd after
applying for the required permission from the government of
India, but without mentioning the amount committed. Why this
reluctance to reveal the amount and nature of the financial
commitment made by Engineering Projects India Ltd?