Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gyombiolgiai s gyomszablyozsi
ismeretek modul
Main topics
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
2
Main topics
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
3
Definition of weed
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
4
Definition of weed
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
Definition of weed
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
6
Importance of weeds
Graminaceae Cruciferae
Compositae} ~ 40% Fabaceae
Cyperaceae Convolvulaceae
Polygonaceae Euphorbiacea
Amarantaceae Chenopodiacea
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
Importance of weeds
4. Polygonaceae 8 65%
5. Amaranthaceae 7
6. Cruciferae 7
7. Fabaceae 6
8. Convolvulaceae 5
9. Euphorbiaceae 5 65%
10. Chenopodiaceae 4
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
Importance of weeds
3. Cruciferae 18
4. Caryophyllaceae 16 73%
5. Fabaceae 13
6. Labiatae 12
7. Chenopodiaceae 11
8. Scrophulariaceae 11
9. Polygonaceae 8 73%
10. Amaranthaceae 4
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
The worst world weeds
Common name Latin name
1. Purple nutsedge Cyperus rotundus
2. Bermuda grass Cynodon dactylon
3. Cockspur grass Echinochloa crus-galli
4. Swampgrass Echinochloa colonum
5. Wiregrass Eleusine indica
6. Johnson grass Sorghum halepense
7. Red baron Imperata cylindrica
8. Waterhyacinth Eichornia crassipes
9. Purslane Portulaca oleraceae
10. Fat-hen Chenopodium album
11. Hairy fingergrass Digitaria sanguinalis
12. Field bindweed Convolvulus arvensis
13. Spring wild-oat Avena fatua
14. Pigweed Amaranthus chlorostachys
15. Spiny amaranth Amaranthus spinosus
16. Yellow nutsedge Cyperus esculentus
17. Hilograss Paspalum conjugatum
18. Itchgrass Rottboellia exaltata
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
The worst weeds in Hungary
Common name Latin name
1. Cockspur grass Echinochloa crus-galli
2. Field bindweed Convolvulus arvensis
3. Fat-hen Chenopodium album
4. Yellow bristle-grass Setaria glauca
5. Redroot Pigweed Amaranthus retroflexus
6. Creeping thistle Cirsium arvense
7. Black bindweed Bilderdykia convolvulus
8. Common ragweed Ambrosia elatior
9. Field woundwort Stachys annua
10. European dewberry Rubus caesius
11. Common couch-grass Elymus repens
12. Flower of-an-hour Hibiscus trionum
13. Cornflower Centaurea cyanus
14. Green bristle-grass Setaria viridis
15. Field horsetail Equisetum arvense
16. Pigweed Amaranthus chlorostachys
17. Pale persicaria Polygonum lapathifolium
18. Charlock Sinapis arvensis
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
Classification of weeds
1. Origin of weeds:
- Native
- Adventives
2. Habitats of weeds:
- Weeds adapted to breeding,
Living around the people ,
Weeds of crop production.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
12
Harmful aspects of weeds (Ujvrosi, 1973)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
13
Harmful aspects of weeds (Ujvrosi, 1973)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
14
Adaptation of weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
15
Adaptation of weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
16
Adaptation of weeds
17
Adaptation of weeds
-Weeds have rapid seedlings growth and the ability to reproduce when
young. (E.g. redroot pigweed can flower and produce seed when less
than 8 inches (3.2 cm) tall. Few crops can do this.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
Adaptation of weeds
Competition for:
-Nutrients
-Light
-Water
Results in lower yields and poor crop quality
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
Adaptation of weeds
2. Reproduction properties
- Weeds have environmental plasticity. Many weeds are
capable of tolerating and growing under a wide range of
climatic and edaphic conditions.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
Adaptation of weeds
2. Reproduction properties
- Weeds often produce seed the same size and shape as crop
seed, making physical separation difficult and facilitating
spread by man. (e.g. alfalfa and Cuscuta spp.)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
21
Adaptation of weeds
2. Reproduction properties
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
22
Adaptation of weeds
2. Reproduction properties
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
23
Adaptation of the weeds
2. Reproduction properties
Build up of soil seed bank
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
24
Adaptation of weeds
3. Allelopathic effect on crop plant
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
25
Adaptation of weeds
4. Weeds can harbour diseases and pathogenic fungi,
esp. crop relatives
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
26
Adaptation of weeds
5. Can be directly parasitic
Dodder (Cuscuta spp.) Convolulaceae (Morningglory)
Family
27
Adaptation of weeds
5. Can be directly parasitic
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
28
Adaptation of weeds
6. Indicate soil characteristics and suitability for crops:
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
29
Benefits of weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
30
Plant life-forms
The most widely applied life-form scheme is the Raunkir
system.
Raunkir plantlife-form: Danish Botanical Society in 1904 -
The subdivisions are based on the location of the plant's
growth-point (bud) during seasons
1. Phanerophytes; 2-3. Chamaephytes; 4. Hemicryptophytes; 5-9. Cryptophytes: 5-6. Geophytes; 7.Helophytes; 8-9.HydrophytesTherophites, Epiphytes
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
31
Plant life-forms
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
32
Plant life-forms of weeds
Korsmo, E. (1930): Unkrauter im Ackerbau der Neuzeit
Balzs-Ujvrosi:
I. THEROPHYTA, T living for less than13 months annual
II. HEMITHEROPHYTA, HT living for two years biennial
III. HEMIKRYPTOPHYTA, H overwintering in the
ground level perennial
IV. GEOPHYTA, G overwintering under the ground
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
33
Weed classification by Ujvrosi (1973)
I. One time blossoming:
- annuals:
T1 germination in autumn, seed
ripening in spring
T2 germination in autumn, seed
ripening at the beginning of summer
T3 germination in spring, seed ripening at the
beginning of summer
T4 germination in spring, seed ripening at the
end of summer
34
Weed classification by Ujvrosi (1973)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
35
Weed classification by life cycle
Weeds are classified into three categories based on
their life history:
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
36
Weed classification by life cycle
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
37
Weed classification by life cycle
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
38
Life cycle of an annual weed
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
39
Winter annual (T-1,2)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
40
Summer annual (T-3,4)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
41
Biannual (HT)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
42
Perennials
H life form:
Overwintering organs stand vertically in the soil layer
H1: plants with fibrous root-system
H2 sarmentose plants
H3: these plants roots are able to reproduce
H4: tap-root unable to reproduce
H5: sloped root-stock
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
43
Perennials (H)
Plalife-forms
HEMIKRYPTOPHYTA, H
Overwintering organ:
Short vertical stem on the ground Short as lope stem below ground
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5
Caltha palustris Poa trivialis Symphytum officinale Ononis spinosa Plantago major
Ranunculus acer Ranunculus repens Taraxacum officinale Eryngium campestre Artemisia vulgaris
Potentilla sp. Rumex obtusifolius Ballota nigra
Glechoma hederacea
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
44
Perennials (H)
HEMIKRYPTOPHYTA, H1
Caltha palustris
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
45
Perennials (H)
HEMIKRYPTOPHYTA, H2
Ranunculus repens
Glechoma hederacea
Potentilla reptans
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
46
Perennials (H)
HEMIKRYPTOPHYTA, H3
Taraxacum officinale
Symphytum officinale
Rumex obstusifolius
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
47
Perennials (H)
HEMIKRYPTOPHYTA, H4
Ononis spinosa
Eryngium campestre
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
48
Perennials (H)
HEMIKRYPTOPHYTA, H5
Plantago major
Artemisia vulgaris
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
49
Perennials
G life form:
Overwintering and reproductive organs are in the soil
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
50
Perennial (H, G)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
51
Perennials (G)
GEOPHYTA, G
Overwintering organ:
Long horizontal stem below ground Short vertical stem below ground
G1 G2 G3 G4
Stolons: Mentha arvensis Cirsium arvense Colchicum autumnale
Elymus repens Mentha aquatica Convolvulus arvensis Ornitogallum umbellatum
Cynodon dactylon Stachys palustris Asclepias syriaca Poa bulbosa
Calistegia sepium
Rhisomes:
Sorgum halepense
Phragmites australis
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
52
Perennials (G)
GEOPHYTA, G1 with stolons
Elymus repens
Cynodon dactylon
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
53
Perennials (G)
Plant life-forms
GEOPHYTA, G1 with rhizomes
Phragmites australis
Sorgum halepense
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
54
Perennials (G)
GEOPHYTA, G2 with tubers Stachys palustris
Mentha arvensis
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
55
Perennials (G)
GEOPHYTA, G3 with creeping roots
Convolvulus arvensis
Cirsium arvense
Asclepias syriaca
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
56
Perennials (G)
GEOPHYTA, G4 with bulbs
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
57
Weed survey methods in Hungary
Exact method's
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
59
Estimating methods
Braun - Blanquet
Hult - Sernander
Balzs Ujvrosi
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
60
Braun Blanquet-scale
Scale values:
1 value = less than 1/20 abundance,
2 value = 1/20 - abundance,
3 value = 1/4 - 1/2 abundance,
4 value = 1/2 - 3/4 abundance,
5 value = 3/4 - 4/4 abundance.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
61
Hult Sernander-scale
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
62
Balzs Ujvrosi weed survey method
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
63
Values of the Balzs-Ujvrosi-scale
6 100.00% of survey area 3-4-4 21.87% of survey area 1-2 4.68% of survey area
5-6-6 87.50% of survey area 3-4 18.75% of survey area 1-1-2 3.90% of survey area
5-6 75.00% of survey area 3-3-4 15.62% of survey area 1 3.12% of survey area
5-5-6 62.50% of survey area 3 12.50% of survey area +-1-1 2.49% of survey area
5 50.00% of survey area 2-3-3 10.93% of survey area +-1 1.87% of survey area
4-5-5 43.75% of survey area 2-3 9.37% of survey area +-+-1 1.24% of survey area
4-5 37.50% of survey area 2-2-3 7.81% of survey area + 0.62% of survey area
4-4-5 31.25% of survey area 2 6.25% of survey area 0-+ 0.36% of survey area
4 25.00% of survey area 1-2-2 5.46% of survey area 0 0.10% of survey area
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
64
Balzs Ujvrosi weed survey method
The weed surveying frame
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
65
Weed survey methods
Early-season weed scouting
The first key to weed management is proper weed
identification. The best method for timely
identification is through field scouting.
The first reports on weed conditions in a field are
needed within two weeks after crop emergence to
evaluate herbicide performance and to determine if
there is a need for rotary hoeing, cultivation, or post
emergence herbicides.
Earlier scouting will be needed in no-till fields where
a knockdown or early preplant herbicide may be
applied.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
66
Weed survey methods
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
67
Weed survey methods
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
68
Weed survey methods
Economic threshold for weeds
An economic threshold for weeds is the density of a
weed population at which control is economically
justified because of the potential for yield reduction,
quality loss, harvesting difficulties, or other problems
that weeds may cause.
69
Reproduction biology of weeds
7
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
1. Definition of annual weeds
(Latin: annus, "year")
Annual weeds are plants that complete their life cycle [from
seed to seed] within one growing season, or in less than 12
months
survive the unfavourable season in the form of seeds
according the life-form scheme - annual species are Therophytes [Th]
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
71
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Annual weed species [Therophytes] can be
classified by their life cycle as follows:
1. Winter annual species emerge in late summer or fall, survive winter, and produce
seed during late spring or early summer of the following year
2. Summer annual species emerge in spring or early summer and produce seeds
during the same growing season
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
72
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
2. Definition and roles of seeds
SEED:
- fertilized, mature (ripened) ovule having an embryonic plant
- it stores food material (endosperm or perisperm), and a protective coat
(testa) or coats
Roles of seeds:
1. vehicle for species multiplication
2. dispersal role
3. protection during conditions unfavourable for
germination and development (dormancy; seed bank)
4. temporary source of food for the embryo
5. source for transfer of a new genetic combinations
(diversity)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
73
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Structure of a seed
A typical seed includes three basic parts: (I.) an embryo, (II.) a supply of nutrients
for the embryo, and (III.) a seed coat
- The embryo is an immature plant from which a new plant will grow under
proper conditions. The embryo has one cotyledon or seed leaf in monocotyledons,
two cotyledons in almost all dicotyledons
- The radicle is the embryonic root
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
74
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
3. Seed production of weeds
extremely fluctuates (e.g Papaver rhoeas: 4-400 capsule/plant)
genotype
environmental factors and their interactions
time of germination
intra- and interspecific competition
pests, hosts, herbicides
under stress situation the life cycle can shorten
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
75
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Examples of seed production by common weed species
(Stevens 1932, 1957 )
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
76
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
4. Dispersal of weed seeds
- Seed dispersal is the movement or transport of seeds away from the parent plant
- Most seed are good travellers, use various forces and agents to transport and
scatter themselves from place to place
To maintain biodiversity
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
77
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
1. Natural: 2. Artificial:
Gravity Machinery
Water Livestock
Animal
Wind
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
78
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Examples of natural seed dispersal
Gravity - Most seed of our common crop field weed species have no
specialized structures and mechanism
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
79
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Examples of natural seed dispersal
Ballistic (self-dispersal) - the physical and often explosive discharge of
seeds from the fruit
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
80
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Examples of natural seed dispersal
Animals:
A seed eaten by an animal can experience different fates. It can be eaten and
dispersed as a viable seed, or be eaten and destroyed by digestion
a./ External way - on the body of animals (barbs, hooks, hairs)
c./ With the help of ants - elaiosome (food body) to attract ants
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
81
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Examples of artificial seed dispersal
- Human activities, most important transport mechanism is modern
agriculture
- Contaminated crop seed historically has been one of the most important
dispersial agents for weed seeds
Machinery - on equipment
Crop seeds
82
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
How far can weed seeds travel?
(Mohler, 2001)
Agricultural weed seeds can travel over range of distances, depending on the method of
transport and the weed species
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
83
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
5. Seed Dormancy
Dispersal phase usually dormant; dehydrated seeds weight less
(esp. wind dispersal) and are metabolically slower
Definitions:
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
84
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Definitions:
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
85
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Significance:
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
86
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
87
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
88
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
The dormancy continuum
Dormancy is not a simple off-on switch
89
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
The dormancy continuum
Level of dormancy changes over time:
- seeds of summer annuals:
are dormant at maturity, and dormancy is released in spring due to low
temperatures during winter, whereas high temperatures during summer
induce secondary dormancy.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
90
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Seasonality of emergence in weed species
Due to dormancy cycling most weed species germinate at particular times of year
In general, two-peak emergence differing according to species can be observed
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
91
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Classification of Seed Dormancy
(Baskin - Baskin, 2004)
1. Physiological dormancy
2. Morphological dormancy
3. Morphophysiological dormancy
4. Physical dormancy
5. Combinational dormancy
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
92
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
1. Physiological dormancy
CAUSE physiological inhibiting mechanism of germination of embryo
prevents germination until a chemical change (hormones, phytocrome,
growth inhibitors) takes place in the seed
- divided into 3 levels - (D, I, DN)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
93
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
2. Morphological dormancy
CAUSE - the seed is immature (underdeveloped) when shed, and a period of
growth and/or differentiation is required before germination can take place
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
94
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
3. Morphophysiological dormancy
CAUSE Seeds have embryos that are underdeveloped and differentiated
as well as a physiologocal component to their dormancy
METHOD TO OVERCOME THIS FORM OF DORMANCY these seeds
require time for embryo growth and a dormancy breaking treatment (cold
or warm stratification)
EXAMPLE some species from the families of Apiaceae, Ranunculaceae,
Papaveraceae (PAPRH)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
95
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
4. Physical dormancy
CAUSE - The seed have impermeable testas or pericarps, the embryo is
therefore dry until the seed coat is broken and water enters
- seed coat may be impermeable to water, oxygen and mechanically resistant
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
96
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
5. Combinational dormancy
CAUSE - multiple mechanism, seed have simultaneously physiological (non-deep)
and physical dormancy
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
97
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Regulation of seed dormancy
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
98
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Regulation of seed dormancy
I. Physiological regulation:
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
99
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Relationship between dormancy and
phytohormones
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
10
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Photoregulation of seed dormancy
The seeds can detect: - absence or presence
- quality (wavelength composition)
- intensity
- duration of light
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
10
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Action mode of Phytochrome
The phytochrome system is the photoreceptor of red light responses
PR - physiologically inactive form - it absorbs red (R; 670 nm) light;
PFR- physiologically active form - it absorbs far red (FR; 730 nm) light
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
10
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
What is a weed seed bank?
Mature seeds are shed from the parent plant and find themselves on the soil surface
The term seed bank is used to describe the
reservoir of viable seeds present on the
surface and in the soil
It consists of numerous seeds many of which
are dormant and delay germination until a
latter time
The size of a seed bank in agricultural land
varies enormously (between sites, fields and
plots) from near zero to as much as 1 million
seeds per m2
It includes
New seeds recently shed by plants
Older seeds that have persisted in the soil
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
10
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Importance of weed seed banks
It is an indicator of past and future weed problems
It is the primary source of new infestations of weeds each year
It gives help to
- learn the dynamics of weed population
- predict plant invasion
- plan the methods and strategies of weed management
Only 1-9 % of the viable seeds produced in a given year develop into
seedlings, the rest remain viable and will germinate in subsequent
years depending on the depth of their burial
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
10
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Composition of seed banks
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
10
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Types of seed banks
(Thompson and Fenner, 2005)
On the basis of the length of time that seeds survive in the soil a seed bank
can be:
Transient - seeds persist in the soil for less than 1 year
e.g. GALAP, BROMO, CENCY
Short-term persistent - seeds persist in the soil at least
1 year but less than 5 years
e.g. TAROF, CONCA
Long-term persistent - seeds persist in the soil more
than 5 years
e.g. STEME, CAPBP, CONAR, PAPRH, AMARE
_________
Seed size + morphological feature The type of a seed bank
- small (0,5-1 mm) + flat surfaced seeds = persistent seed bank
- large (2-4 mm) + appendage seeds = transient seed bank
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
10
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
What happens to seeds in the soil?
Active versus dormant (persistent) seed banks
Active seed bank consists of seeds that are able to
germinate
Dormant seeds make up the persistent seed bank and
are able to survive for many years
Examples:
Small seeded annual weed seeds without a hard seed coat only
persist a couple of years e.g. SET sp., DIGSA
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
10
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Dynamics of soil seed bank
(inputs to seed bank are shown with black arrows, and losses in white arrows)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
10
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Weed seed rain
Weed seed input (also called seed rain)
Without seed input the seed bank will rapidly
decline
Local sources of seed predominates
95% of seed rain comes from annual weeds growing in
field
Distant sources are important if local seed production
is limited
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
10
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Seed persistence
The longevity of seeds in the soil is highly variable, and depends on species,
depth of seed burial, soil type and the level of disturbance
most long-lived species are annuals
small seeds tend to have much longer soil lives than large ones
max. seed viability in the soil e.g. Spergula arvensis: 1600 years (in archaeological digs)
Cirsium arvense 21
Chenopodium album 39
Portulaca oleracea 30
Ambrosia artemisiifolia 39
Amaranthus retroflexus 10
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
11
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Weed seed distribution in the soil
Majority of seeds in no-till agricultural
field is located in the upper 5 cm of
soil profile
In cultivated soils in the upper 15 cm
of soil profile
Cultivation and tillage continuously
invert the soil profile
Bringing up seeds previously buried to
the upper soil surface layers more
readily germinate
The type of cultivation is important for
distribution (e.g. ploughing buries
seeds below 10 cm)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
11
Reproduction Biology of annual weeds
Tillage effects on weed seed distribution
Repeated tillage for several years without reinfestation
will reduce the weed seed population in soil
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
11
Reproduction biology of weeds
1
Reproduction Biology of perennial weeds
(Latin per, "through", annus, "year")
A perennial plant or perennial is a plant that lives for
more than two years
Perennials are Herbaceous and Woody perennials
(trees and shrubs)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
11
Perennial weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
11
Perennial weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
11
Reproduction of perennials
Reproduction of perennials:
I. Strategies of reproduction
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
III. Factors affecting the regeneration of perennials
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
11
Reproduction of perennials
I. Strategies of reproduction
a) Mainly reproducing by seeds
High seed production and effective seed propagation.
Spreading by seeds but settlement by asexual ways.
Rumex crispus, R. obtusifolius, Ranunculus repens, Mentha arvensis,
Achillea millefolium
b) Generative and vegetative forms are equal
importance
Tough, hard to kill weeds.
Have to control both the seedling and the daughter
plant. Sorghum halepense, Asclepias syriaca, Calystegia sepium
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
11
Reproduction of perennials
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
11
Reproduction of perennials
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
Stolon
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
12
Reproduction of perennials (Elymus repens)
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
Stolon
(Hunyadi et al.1988)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
12
Reproduction of perennials
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
Stolon
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
12
Reproduction of perennials
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
Rhizomes
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
12
Reproduction of perennials
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
Rhizomes
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
12
Reproduction of perennials
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
Rhizomes
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
12
Reproduction of perennials
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
b) Creeping roots
12
Reproduction of perennials
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
b) Creeping roots
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
12
Reproduction of perennials
(
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
12
Reproduction of perennials
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
c) Reproducing from taproot
Rootcrown
Axillarybuds Sideshoot
leaf
Adventitiousroots
Taproot
Lateralroot
12
Reproduction of perennials
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
c) Reproducing from taproot
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
13
Reproduction of perennials
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
d) Tubers, bulbs, runners
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
13
Reproduction of perennials
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
13
Reproduction of perennials
II. Main asexual forms of reproduction
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
13
Reproduction of perennials
1. Periodicity
2. Apical dominance
3. Environmental effects
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
13
Reproduction of perennials
1. Periodicity
13
Reproduction of perennials
III. Factors affecting the regeneration of perennials
1. Periodicity
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
13
Reproduction of perennials
III. Factors affecting the regeneration of perennials
1. Periodicity
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
13
Reproduction of perennials
III. Factors affecting the regeneration of perennials
1. Periodicity
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
13
Reproduction of perennials
III. Factors affecting the regeneration of perennials
1. Periodicity
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
13
Reproduction of perennials
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
14
Reproduction of perennials
III. Factors affecting the regeneration of perennials
2. Apical dominance
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
14
Reproduction of perennials
III. Factors affecting the regeneration of perennials
2. Apical dominance
Importance:
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
14
Reproduction of perennials
Temperature
Light
Nitrogen
14
Effects of environmental factors on
weeds
Factors relating to weed establishment and survival
Environmental factors:
1. Climatic factors:
Light (intensity, quality, and duration including
photoperiod)
Temperature (extremes , average, frost-free period)
Water (amount, percolation, runoff and evaporation)
Wind (velocity, duration)
Atmosphere (CO2, O2, humidity)
Many of the most common weeds have a broad
tolerance to environmental conditions
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
14
Factors relating to weed establishment and survival
2. Physiographic factors
Edaphic:
soil factors
pH
Texture
Structure
Fertility
Organic content humus
Water drainage
CO2, O2
Topographic:
altitude
slope
exposure to the sun
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
14
Factors relating to weed establishment and survival
3. Biotic factors:
Plants:
competition
allelophaty (released toxins or stimulants)
parasitism
diseases
soil flora
Animals:
insects, grazing animals, soil fauna,
Humans
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
14
Forms of plant interactions
1. Competition
2. Allelopathy
3. Parasitism: the phenomenon of one living organism living in,
on or with another living organism to complete its life cycle
an one-sided association in which one of the symbionts (the
parasite) benefits at the expense of the other (the host).
4. Symbiosis: symbiosis is the living together of different
organisms, usually in close association with one another, to
the benefit of at least one of them. The partners are
referred to as symbionts.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
14
Factors relating to weed establishment and survival
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
14
Competition
Competition
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
15
Competition
Type of competition
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
15
Competition
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
15
Competition
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
15
Influencing factors of competition
Competitive capacity of a varieties is genetically
determined.
Attributes influenced competition: (Clements et al.
1929) For them competition was a purely physical
process.
1. Permanency: seizing of territory and height
2. Rhythm of growth
3. Quick germination
4. Vigor favorable under stress to survive
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
15
Influencing factors of competition
Influencing factors:
1. Reaction to different light intensity
2. Reaction to rising temperature
3. Reaction to changing oxygen of atmosphere
4. Photorespiration (presence or absence)
5. C3 or C4 photosynthesis
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
15
Influencing factors of competition
Shematic diagram of the competition encountered by
a plant
(Blesdale 1960)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
15
Influencing factors of competition
Pozsgai 1988: factors of competition must complete
with anthropogenic effect:
agrotechnic
Fertilizers
Plant protection
Weed control
Integrated plant protection give preference to crop
plant
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
15
Critical competitive period
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
15
Critical competitive period some crops
Critical competitive period of some crops
week
Maize 3
Rice 3
Peanut 3-4
Soya bean 3
Wheat 5
Cotton 6
Potato 9
Sugarbeet 8
Oilseed rape 10
Onion 12
Flax 12
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
16
Competition for nutrients
Fertilization is used to improve crop growth, but may
worsen the weed problem.
Macronutrients: nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus,
primary plant nutrients
Nitrophyl weeds: Galium aparine, Apera spica-venti, Avena
fatua, Chenopodium album, Amaranthus retroflexus
Mezo- and micronutrients content of weeds usually
higher than crops
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
16
Competition for nutrients
Kilograms of nutrients required to produce equal
amounts of dry matter
Weeds require the same nutrients, at the same times, and they usually
take up nutrients more quickly, and greater extent than crop plant in
ecosystem.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
16
Competition for nutrients
Nitrogen is the first nutrient to become limiting in most
instances of weed-crop competition. Rooting depth and root
area of plant determine the ability to obtain resources, and
relative competitiveness for nitrogen is largely determined by
the soil volume occupied by roots of competing species.
Movement of P and K is slow, and they move over short
distance. Competition most likely to occur after plant are
mature and have extensive, overlapping root development.
Because of this fact competition for P and K more apparent in
perennial crops.
Concentration of N and K usually highest at beginning of
vegetation period, but P at generative period.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
16
Szraz hajtstmeg (g/nvny)
12
14
16
18
20
10
0
2
4
6
8
Kontroll
Stomp 330+Basagran
Pledge 50 WP+Basagran
N0
Command 48 EC+Basagran
Kontroll
Stomp 330+Basagran
Pledge 50 WP+Basagran
N100
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
Command 48 EC+Basagran
Competition for nutrients
Kontroll
Pledge 50 WP+Basagran
Command 48 EC+Basagran
Kontroll
Stomp 330+Basagran
N300
Pledge 50 WP+Basagran
Dry matter production of pea influenced by nitrogen and herbicides
Command 48 EC+Basagran
16
Szraz hajtstmeg (g/nvny)
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0
5
Kontroll
Stomp 330+Basagran
Pledge 50 WP+Basagran
N0
Command 48 EC+Basagran
Kontroll
Stomp 330+Basagran
N100
Pledge 50 WP+Basagran
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
Command 48 EC+Basagran
Competition for nutrients
Kontroll
Stomp 330+Basagran
N200
Pledge 50 WP+Basagran
Command 48 EC+Basagran
Kontroll
Stomp 330+Basagran
N300
Pledge 50 WP+Basagran
Command 48 EC+Basagran
Dry matter production of Chenopodium album influenced by nitrogen and herbicides
16
Hajts nitrogntartalom (%)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Kontroll
Stomp 330+Basagran
Pledge 50 WP+Basagran
N0
Command 48
EC+Basagran
Kontroll
Stomp 330+Basagran
N100
Pledge 50 WP+Basagran
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
Command 48
EC+Basagran
Competition for nutrients
Kontroll
Stomp 330+Basagran
N200
Pledge 50 WP+Basagran
Command 48
EC+Basagran
Kontroll
Stomp 330+Basagran
N300
Pledge 50 WP+Basagran
Command 48
EC+Basagran
Nitrogen content of Chenopodium album influenced by nitrogen and herbicides
16
sszes gyomborts (%)
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
Kontroll
Command 48
EC+Basagran
Sencor 70 WG+Basagran
N0
Stomp 330+Basagran
Kontroll
Command 48
EC+Basagran
N1
Sencor 70 WG+Basagran
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
Stomp 330+Basagran
Competition for nutrients
Kontroll
Command 48
EC+Basagran
N2
Sencor 70 WG+Basagran
Stomp 330+Basagran
Kontroll
Effect of nitrogen and herbicides on weed density
N3
Command 48
EC+Basagran
Sencor 70 WG+Basagran
Stomp 330+Basagran
16
Competition for water
Water or its lack is often the primary environmental
factor limiting crop production, and water is probably
the most critical of all plant growth requirements.
Without irrigation the rainfall determines the
geographic limit of crops.
Weeds compete for water, reduce water availability,
and contribute to crop water stress. Weedy
sunflowers require approximately twice as much
water as corn.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
16
Competition for water
In arid areas developed a fallow cropping system:
wheat is grown one year and the land is fallowed (no
crop) next year, and rotated back to wheat in the
third year. The aim is water conservation, because
there is not enough rainfall to growth wheat each
year, therefore minimum or no-tillage system,
sometimes called ecofallow. The ecofallow system
increased water, soil nitrate, grain protein and wheat
yield.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
16
Competition for water
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
17
Competition for water
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
17
Competition for water
17
Competition for light
The total supply of light is the most reliable of the
several environmental resources required for plant
growth.
But in contrast to water and nutrients, light cannot be
stored for later use- it must be used when received or
it is lost forever.
Light regulates many aspects of plant growth and
development.
It varies in duration, intensity and quality.
Neighboring plants may reduce light supply by direct
interception -shading
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
17
Competition for light
Leaves that first intercept light may reflect it, absorb
it, convert it to photosynthetic products, convert it to
heat, or transmit it.
If transmitted, the light is filtered so that when is
reaches lower leaves, it is dimmer and spectrally
altered.
Any time one leaf is shaded by another, there is
competition for light.
Light competition is most severe when there is high
fertility and adequate moisture because plants grow
vigorously and have larger foliar areas.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
17
Competition for light
Plants with large LAI have a competitive advantage
and normally outcompete plants with smaller leaf
area.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
17
Competition for light
A heavily shaded plant suffers reduced
photosynthesis, leading to poor growth, a smaller
root system, and a reduced capacity for water and
nutrient uptake.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
17
Plant characteristics and competitiveness
Foliar competition
Rapid expansion of a tall, foliar canopy
Horizontal leaves
Large leaves
C4 photosynthesis
Leaves forming a mosaic leaf arrangement for best
light interception
A climbing habit (Gallium aparine, Convolvulus
arvensis)
Tall stem
Rapid stem extension in response to shading
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
17
Plant characteristics and competitiveness
Root competition:
early and fast root penetration of a large soil area
High root density/soil volume
High root-shoot ratio
High root length per root weight
Actively growing roots
Long and abundant root hairs
High uptake potential for nutrients and water
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
17
Effect of weed competition on yield
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
17
Effect of weed competition on yield
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
18
Methods to study competition
1. Replacement designs
Total plant density is maintained constant, but the relative
proportion of species is varied from zero to a pure stand.
Additionally, for each species, pure stands must be included at
each of densities in the mixtures to enable intraspecific
competition to be determined.
This method often undertaken in glasshouse pot studies.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
18
Methods to study competition
2. Additive designs
To study the effect of increasing weed density on crop yield we use
most often the additive design. We can predict of yield loss.
Density of one species (usually the crop) is maintained constant while
the other (weed) varies.
This method we use in glasshouse pot studies and on field experiments.
plant number
crop weed
4 0
4 1
4 2
4 3
4 4
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
18
Methods to study competition
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
18
Leaf area of pea and Sinapis arvensis in an additive experiment
600
A bors levlfellete A SINAR levlfellete
500
levlfellet (cm2/edny)
400
300
200
100
0
Kontroll SINAR 5 db/t.e. SINAR 10 db/t.e. SINAR 15 db/t.e.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
18
Methods to study competition
3. Growth analysis
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
18
BBCH scale
Subdivision of the developmental cycle of plant
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
18
Methods to study competition
3. Growth analysis
Increase biomass
production
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
18
Methods to study competition
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
18
Allelopathy
Allelopathy
The word allelopathy:
Derived from Greek allelo, meaning each other and patho,
an expression of sufferance or disease.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
19
Allelopathy
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
19
Allelopathy part of competition
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
19
Early observations
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
19
Allelopathy
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
19
Chemistry of allelochemicals
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
19
Chemistry of allelochemicals
Allelochemicals in plants
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
19
Juglon index:
Juglone: powerful toxin produce by the leaves of black
walnut (Juglans nigra) 5-hydroxy--naphthaquinone
hinders emergence
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
19
Production of allelochemicals
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
19
Production of allelochemicals
Allelochemical compounds are released from the
plants:
Vapor
Leaching from the foliage
Exudates from the roots
Decomposition of dead plant residues
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
19
How allelochemicals get out of plant
(Aldrich, 1984)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
20
How allelochemicals get out of plant
Evaporation the most important in arid and semiarid
areas of the world. (Artemisia spp., Eucalyptus spp.)
Exudates from the roots:
Verified with wheat, oak, maize, pea, cucumber, tomato,
sunflower
Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Sorghum halepense, Dygitaria
sanguinalis
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
20
How allelochemicals get out of plant
Leaching from the foliage:
Pinus densiflora, Juglans regia, Helianthus annuus,
Platanus occidentalis, Brassica nigra, Abutilon theophrasti
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
20
Weeds with allelopathic activity
Weeds with alleged allelopathic activity
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
20
Weeds with allelopathic activity
Weeds with alleged allelopathic activity
Weed susceptible species
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
20
Weeds with alleged allelopathic activity
Weeds with alleged allelopathic activity
Weed susceptible species
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
20
Crop plants with allelopathic activity
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
20
Crops whose residues are phytotoxic
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
20
Crops whose residues are phytotoxic
Crops with phytotoxic residues
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
20
Effect of allelochemicals
Direct:
Effect on germination, growth, metabolism
Indirect:
Effect on soil properties, nutrient content, change of plant
population , microorganism population, insect population
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
20
Allelochemicals influence:
Cell division, and ultra structure
Plant hormones and their balance
Permeability of membranes
Germination of pollens and spores
Nutrient uptake
Stomach regulation, photosynthesis, pigment synthesis
Respiration
Protein synthesis
Nitrogen fixation
Enzyme activity
Tissue formation
Water circulation
Genetic program
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
21
Allelochemicals
Allelochemicals from plants with potential
herbicidal activity
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
21
Allelochemicals
Volatile essential oils
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
21
Allelochemicals
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
21
Allelochemicals
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
21
Allelochemicals
Category of compound weeds affected
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
21
Allelochemicals
Category of compound weeds affected
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
21
Allelochemicals
Category of compound weeds affected
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
21
Allelochemicals
Category of compound weeds affected
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
21
Allelochemicals
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
21
Effect of allelochemicals on ecosystems
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
22
Effect of allelochemicals on ecosystems
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
22
Effect of allelochemicals on ecosystems
In a lot of ecosystems live only one species, or density
of species is characteristic
Among phanerophytas walnut, locust, plane tree
have a selective herbicidal effect on weeds
Soil boreding: problem at orchard replanting
(peach, apple)
After growing of Sorghum cant growing other plants
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
22
Methodologies for studying allelopathy
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
22
Methodologies for studying allelopathy
Bioassay
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
22
Bioassay
Winter wheat
Control
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
22
Bioassay
Radish control
Radish+ABUTH leaves
extract
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
22
Bioassay
Bean control
Bean+ABUTH
leaves extract
Bean+ABUTH
seed extract
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
22
Bioassay
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
22
Pot experiments in green house
Use different soil types
1. Extracts may use one time (unit area)
- or watering more times
2. mixed the dried leaves or roots into the
soil
Estimation:
we measure the germination rate, hight of plants,
fresh- and dry veight, nutrient content, etc.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
22
Step methode
Weed
Crop
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
23
Field experiments
On small plots
Environmental factors have an important roll: temperatur,
rain, etc.
Microbiall degradation
Spraying solution
Or sowing donor and acceptor species together
Mixed plant parts into the soil, or took to the soil
surface
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
23
Methode to determine allelochemicals
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
23
Cultural practices:
1. Crop rotation and weed management
The manipulation of allelopathic rotation crops can
provide an effective means of weed management.
- sunflower reduces the density of both broadleaf and
grassy weeds.
- soybean-corn-wheat rotation decrease of giant
foxtail population
- alfalfa reduces the incidence of weeds in the next
crop (Avena fatua, cirsium arvense, Gallium aparine)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
23
Cultural practices:
2. Allelopathic cover crops
Cover crops are grown for several motives such as
conservation of soil and moisture, improvement of
nutrient cycling, lowering of temperatur, supplying
forages in emergency, protection of cash crops from
winds, suppression of weeds, increase in crop
production.
Hairy vetch suppresses weeds, reduce the emergence of
chenopodium album, imperata cylindrica.
Velvetbean and kudzu can effectively control speargrass
(Imperata spp.) in fallows and maiz fields.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
23
Cultural practices:
Cover crops with allelopathic property and weed-
supressing ability
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
23
Cultural practices:
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
23
Allelochemicals identified from the cover crops
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
23
Cover crop allelochemicals
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
23
Cultural practises:
Green manure crops
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
23
3. Allelopathic crop residues
The presence of crop residues on the soil surface as
mulch suppresses weeds through allelopathy
- Wheat (Amaranthus spp.) aqueous extracts inhibit
the growth of velvetleaf, barnyardgrass, and redroot
pigweed
- Rice: grassy and broadleaf weeds
- Sorghum: Digitaria ishaemum, velvetleaf, redroot
pigweed and Rumex acetosella
- Alfalfa: grassy and broadleaf weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
24
Allelochemicals as herbicides
Allelopathy has the potential to play a prominent role
in weed management if it can be properly harnessed
Characteristics:
They are environmentally friendly
They have comparatively less residual activity, rapid
degradation
They have novel target sites of action
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
24
Allelochemicals as herbicides
In spite of many compounds being tested, only a few
have been marketed.
mesotrion leptospermone
Callistemon citrinus
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
24
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
24
Herbicide resistance in weed species
Definition of resistance
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
24
Definition of resistance
Cross resistance:
resistance to more than one chemicals with the same target
site or same metabolic enzime.
For example, one herbicide selected for the resistant biotype, but this
biotype is also resistant to other herbicides in the same mode of
action.
Multiple resistance:
occurs when resistance to several herbicides results from
two or more distinct resistant mechanism in the same
plant.
For example, resistance to both triazine and ALS-inhibiting herbicides,
which are two different modes of action.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
24
Definition of resistance
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
24
Definition of resistance
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
24
Definition of resistance
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
24
Distribution of herbicide resistant weeds
The first case of herbicide resistance (to 2,4-D) was reported by Hilton (1957).
The first case of atrazin resistance in Senecio vulgaris (to simazine) in Washington
State was reported by Ryan (1970).
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
25
Distribution of herbicide resistant weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
25
Distribution of herbicide resistant weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
25
Herbicide resistant weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
25
Distribution of herbicide resistant weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
25
Distribution of herbicide resistant weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
25
Development and mechanism of resistance in weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
25
Development of resistance
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
25
Development of resistance
Important factors help to evolve herbicide-resistance:
25
Development of resistance
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
25
Development of resistance
Important factors help to evolve herbicide-resistance:
3. The weed fitness
Ecological fitness is the ability of one biotype to be more successful in a given
environment than another because of greater biomass production, more
seed produced per plant, or higher germination potential. This has been
observed for res. biotypes of weeds to triazine herbicides. If no herbicide is
applied and res. and selective biotypes are competing, the proportion of
resistant biotype should decrease since they have reduced ecological
fitness
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
26
Development of resistance
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
26
Mechanism of resistance
3. Herbicide sequestration
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
26
Mechanism of resistance
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
26
Mechanism of resistance
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
26
Mechanism of resistance
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
26
Mechanism of resistance
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
26
Mechanism of resistance
2. Enhanced herbicide metabolism
Enzyme System Weed Species Herbicide
Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase Alopecurus myosuroides chlorotoluron
diclofop
propaquizafop
chlorsulfuron
Avena sterilis diclofop
Lolium rigidum diclofop
chlorsulfuron
chlorotoluron
metribuzin
simazine
chlorotoluron
Phalaris minor isoproturon
Sinapsis arvensis ethametsulfuron
Stellar media mecoprop
Glutathione transferases Abutilon theophrasti atrazine
Alopecuris mysouroides fenoxaprop
Aryl acylamidase Echinochloa colona propanil
Echinochloa crus-galli propanil
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
26
Mechanism of resistance
3. Herbicide sequestration
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
26
Mechanism of resistance
4. Overproduction of the target site
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
26
Resistance by mode of action
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
27
Resistance to triazines
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
27
Resistance to triazines
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
27
Resistance to triazines
Triazines are inhibiting photosynthesis at PSII by binding to QB (D1)
and blocking the transport of electrons between Q-PQ.
Resistance is based on several mechanism, mainly:
Modified binding site of QB-protein (target site insensitivity)
Hydroxilation, dealkylation, glutation-conjugation (herbicide
metabolism)
First ocurence: Amaranthus hybridus (USA Maryland) 1972
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
27
Resistance to triazines
QB (D1) -protein
PQ (Plastoquinon)
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
27
Resistance to triazines
QB (D1)-protein
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
27
Resistance to triazines
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
27
Resistance to ALS-inhibitors
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
27
Resistance to ALS-inhibitors
Three groups are inhibiting the acetolactate-synthetase:
imidazolinones (IMI), pyrimidinylthiobenzoates (PTB),
sulfonylaminocarbonyltriazolinones (SCT), sulfonylureas (SU),
and triazolopyrimidines (TP).
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
27
Resistance to ALS-inhibitors
Multiple mutations are responsible for ALS resistance. For
example, mutations in the gene that encodes ALS which result
in any one of the amino acids changes will result in resistance
to the ALS inhibitors. The particular mutation determines to
which ALS inhibitor family the weed will be resistant.
For example: change in Pro197 sulfonylureas,
substitution at Ala122 imidazolinone
Plants resistant to the ALS inhibitors do not have reduced
fitness. Therefore, the resistant populations build up quickly.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
27
Resistance to ALS-inhibitors
For example:
Resistance to sulfonil-ureas SUMO and Expres varieties
Resistance to imidazolinones - IMI varieties
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
28
Resistance to glyphosate
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
28
Resistance to glyphosate
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
28
Resistance to glyphosate
28
Resistance to glyphosate
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
28
Resistance to ACCase-inhibitors
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
28
Resistance to ACCase-inhibitors
The enzyme Acetyl-coenzyme-A-carboxylase catalyses the first
committed step of fatty acid biosynthesis.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
28
Management of herbicide
resistant weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
28
Management of herbicide resistant weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
28
Management of herbicide resistant weeds
The following key areas of weed management will help to reduce the
selection pressure on any weed species hence significantly reducing
the chance of survival of resistant weeds:
1. Cultural techniques
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
28
Management of herbicide resistant weeds
2. Crop rotation
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
29
Management of herbicide resistant weeds
3. Herbicide rotation and herbicide mixtures
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
29
Management of herbicide resistant weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
29
Management of herbicide resistant weeds
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
29
Management of herbicide resistant weeds
What to do in cases of confirmed herbicide resistance
The degree of the action will depend on the stage of the crop in the field and
the extent of the problem.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
29
Useful books and sites:
R. Zimdahl: Fundamentals of weed science
R. Zimdahl: Weed-crop competition: a rewiew
T. A. Hill: The biology of weeds
F. A. Macias, Juan C.G. Galindo, Jose M. G. Molinillo, Horace G. Cutler:
Allelopathy: Chemistry and Mode of Action of Allelochemicals
CRC Press September 2003
Wod Powel Anderson: Weed Science, principles and applications
A.H. Cobb J.P.H. Reade: Herbicides and Plant Physiology
Robert E. L. Naylor (ed.): Weed Management Handbook
Prado et al.: Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbicides
R. Labrada (ed): Weed Management for Developing Countries
http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/y5031e/y5031e00.htm#Contentsc
Plant and Soil Sciences eLibrary
http://plantandsoil.unl.edu
Plant Physiology online
http://5e.plantphys.net/
The HRAC website
http://hracglobal.com/
International survey of herbicide resistant weeds
http://www.weedscience.org
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
29
Francisco A Macias, Juan C.G. Galindo, Jose M. G. Molinillo, Horace G Cutler 2003:
Allelopathy: Chemistry and Mode of Action of Allelochemicals
CRC Press
Magyar L., Kazinczi G. 2002: A gyommagvak nyugalmi llapota s
csrzskolgija. I. A magnyugalmi llapot (dormancia) okai, tpusai s
feloldsnak lehetsgei. Magyar Gyomkutats s Technolgia 3 (2), 3-20.
Kazinczi G., Magyar L. 2003: A gyommagvak nyugalmi llapota s
csrzskolgija. II. A gyommagvak szntfldi csrzsa s a dormancia fajon
belli eltrse. Magyar Gyomkutats s Technolgia 4 (1), 3-17.
TMOP-4.1.2.A/2-10/1-2010-0012
29
Thank you for your attention
Dr. Ndasyn dr. Ihrosi Erzsbet
Dr. Rita Szab
Georgikon Kar
Nvnyvdelmi Intzet
AZ ELADS LETLTHET:
-