Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Hope College Education Department is committed to a developmental approach to all field experiences. We believe pre-service
teachers need a wide range of experiences in the classroom in order to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of an effective
decision maker and teacher. Student teaching represents the culminating experience of the professional program. At Level III, the
student teacher has opportunities to plan, implement, and evaluate professional decisions in the school setting. This evaluation form
reflects the demonstration of the knowledge, skills, and attitudes we expect of Hope graduates.
Please rate the student teacher in each of these areas: Ethical Educator, Skilled Communicator, Engaged Professional, Curriculum
Developer, Effective Instructor, Decision Maker, and Reflective Practitioner. Please use the rating indicators listed below. For each item,
check the box in the cell that corresponds with your rating of the student teacher:
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS: If you think that the student teacher exceeded expectations for a particular standard, please write
examples/evidence in the exceeds expectations box.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS: Student teacher met the standard by the end of student teaching, which is considered A work.
DEVELOPING EXPECTATIONS: Student teacher has not met this standard yet, but is still working toward it.
DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATIONS: Student teacher rarely exhibited behavior/disposition/skill and/or responds in an inappropriate manner.
NOT OBSERVABLE: There was no opportunity to observe because of the classroom, school or district.
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 1
Color Coding:
Planning -- Pink
Classroom Environment Blue
Instruction Green
Professional Responsibilities Purple
PROFESSIONAL ABILITY 1:
ETHICAL EDUCATOR (Professional Dispositions)
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 2
Exceeds Meets Developing Does Not Meet Not
Expectations Expectations Expectations Expectations Observed
Displays a positive attitude
when interacting with Student teachers Student teachers Student teachers
students interactions with learners are interactions are for the most interactions with some
friendly and demonstrate part appropriate but may learners is negative,
genuine warmth, caring, and reflect occasional demeaning, sarcastic, or
respect and these are inconsistencies, favoritism, inappropriate to their ages or
appropriate to developmental or disregard for learners cultures
norms cultures
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 3
Exceeds Meets Developing Does Not Meet Not
Expectations Expectations Expectations Expectations Observed
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 4
PROFESSIONAL ABILITY 2:
SKILLED COMMUNICATOR
Establishes and
communicates procedures Student teacher establishes Student teacher is Student teacher does not
and regularly communicates inconsistent with communicate or reinforce
procedures for transitions communication and procedures
and routines. Student reinforcement of established
teacher practices procedures
procedures with students
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 5
Exceeds Meets Developing Does Not Meet Not
Expectations Expectations Expectations Expectations Observed
Gives clear directions
Student teachers directions Student teachers directions Student teachers directions
are clear to learners and and procedures are and procedures are
contain an appropriate level excessively detailed or need confusing to learners
of detail to be clarified after initial
learner confusion
Explains content
accurately Student teachers Student teachers Student teachers
explanation of content is explanation of content is explanations are confusing
consistently accurate and accurate but at times and often contribute to
effectively answers students answers to students students lack of
questions questions lack clarity understanding.
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 6
Exceeds Meets Developing Does Not Meet Not
Expectations Expectations Expectations Expectations Observed
Writes at a professional
level Student teachers written Student teacher uses written
Student teachers written
language is grammatically language that is full of errors
language is grammatically
correct and appropriate in and/or is inappropriate for
correct, but is not always
vocabulary and style for the the audience
appropriate for the audience
audience
Communicates in a
culturally appropriate way Student teachers Student teachers Student teachers
communications are communications can be communications are
appropriate to families inappropriate and/or culturally inappropriate
cultural norms insensitive to families
cultural norms at times
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 7
PROFESSIONAL ABILITY 3:
ENGAGED PROFESSIONAL
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 8
Exceeds Meets Developing Does Not Meet Not
Expectations Expectations Expectations Expectations Observed
Establishes and maintains
professional relationships Student teacher has Student teacher establishes Student teachers
with colleagues amicable, collaborative but has trouble maintaining relationships with colleagues
relationships with colleagues relationships with colleagues are characterized by
negativity
Seeks involvement in a
Student teacher seeks out Student teacher participates Student teacher reluctantly
culture of professional
opportunities for professional in professional activities participates with colleagues
inquiry
development and actively when asked in professional activities or
engages in professional does not participate at all
activities with colleagues
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 9
PROFESSIONAL ABILITY 4:
CURRICULUM DEVELOPER
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 11
PROFESSIONAL ABILITY 5:
EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTOR
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 12
Exceeds Meets Developing Does Not Meet Not
Expectations Expectations Expectations Expectations Observed
Encourages students to
explain their thinking Student teacher asks Student teacher asks Student teacher asks few
questions to probe students students to explain their questions and does not
understanding and that thinking, but does not probe attend to student thinking
encourage students to them to provide evidence to
explain their thinking and support their ideas
provide evidence to support
their ideas
Encourages positive
student student Student teacher intentionally Student teacher gives Student teacher facilitates
interactions teaches students how to opportunities for students to discussions that include
interact with and learn from talk with one another, but teacher-student interactions,
one another during some does not teach them how to but not student-student
discussions actively listen or interact with interactions
one anothers ideas
Monitors student learning
Student teacher formatively Student teacher checks for Student teacher teaches
assesses students by understanding during lessons without checking for
checking for understanding, lessons but does not record student understanding
recording the information and/or use the information to
and using responses to inform teaching
inform future planning,
instruction and assessment
Implements suitable
pacing Student teacher implements Student teachers pacing is Student teacher makes
suitable pacing that provides at times dragged out or inappropriate pacing choices
time for intellectual rushed, which limits time for during lessons which results
engagement with the intellectual engagement, in little time for intellectual
content, closure and student closure and student engagement or closure
reflection reflection
Provides specific and
timely feedback Student teacher provides Student teacher provides Student teacher rarely
specific and timely feedback feedback, but it is not always provides feedback
and allows students to revise timely or specific enough to
their work (except when a help students
summative assessment)
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 13
PROFESSIONAL ABILITY 6:
DECISION MAKER
Addresses student
behavior Student teacher consistently Student teacher positively Student teacher is
and positively reinforces reinforces appropriate inconsistent and fails to
appropriate behavior and behavior and addresses positively reinforce
addresses inappropriate inappropriate conduct, but is appropriate or address
conduct not always consistent inappropriate behavior
Capitalizes on teachable
moments Student teacher seizes Student teacher recognizes Student teacher ignores or
opportunities to enhance questions, brushes aside questions,
learning, by building on misunderstandings, student misunderstandings, student
questions, interest and spontaneous interest and spontaneous
misunderstandings, student events, but does not seize events
interest and spontaneous the teachable moment
events that arise during
lessons
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 14
Exceeds Meets Developing Does Not Meet Not
Expectations Expectations Expectations Expectations Observed
Demonstrates
responsiveness to Student teacher Student teacher recognizes Student teacher continues
students demonstrates flexibility when a lesson is faltering, with lessons even when it is
during lessons when it but is unsure how to alter the clear that students do not
becomes evident that lesson on the spot understand the content
students need further
explanation or a different
approach
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 15
PROFESSIONAL ABILITY 7:
REFLECTIVE PRACTITIONER
Utilizes technology to
enhance instruction Student teacher designs Student teacher utilizes Student teacher plans
lessons utilizing technology technology, but not always in lessons that rarely include
to meet instructional goals ways that enhance the technology (even though it is
and engage students lesson available)
Uses technology to
communicate with Student teacher uses a Student teacher uses Student teacher refuses to or
students and families variety of information minimal information does not have the necessary
technology resources to technology to gather and skills to utilize technology to
enhance communication communicate information gather and communicate
with students and families information
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 16
Exceeds Meets Developing Does Not Meet Not
Expectations Expectations Expectations Expectations Observed
Engages in meaningful
reflection of lessons Student teacher makes Student teacher reflects on Student teacher is unable to
thoughtful and evidence- lessons, but does not provide say whether a lesson was
based assessment of a specific examples to effective or achieved its
lessons effectiveness and substantiate their analysis goals, or profoundly
the extent to which it misjudges the success of a
achieved its goals, citing lesson partially due to a lack
specific examples from the of evidence
lesson and weighing the
relative strengths of each
Develops professional
evidence-based goals Student teacher works with Student teacher sets goals Student teacher ignores
collaboratively mentor teachers with mentors but does not feedback and fails to set
(cooperating teacher and takes into account all professional goals
college supervisor) to set sources of data (i.e.
goals based on various feedback from
sources of data (i.e. mentors/administrators,
feedback from student assessments and
mentors/administrators, work samples, etc.)
student assessments, work
samples, etc.)
Utilizes feedback to inform
teaching Student teacher seeks and Student teacher seeks out Student teacher does not
utilizes feedback from feedback from cooperating appear to value or ask for
cooperating teacher, college teacher, college supervisor, feedback and teaching does
supervisor, and students to and students, but does not not change as a result
inform planning and use it to inform planning and
teaching teaching
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 17
FINAL STUDENT TEACHING SUMMARY EVALUATION
Student Teacher: Cooperating Teacher:
Savannh Girmscheid Amy Denver
School Name: City, State & Zip Code:
Singapore American School Singapore
Subject Area(s): Grade Level(s):
All 3
Dates of Start End College Supervisor:
Experience: Date 10/3/2016 Date 12/16/2016 Leigh Martin
COOPERATING TEACHERS SUMMARY COMMENTS: (comments can be made below or on school letterhead)
During Savannah's time at Singapore American School, she proved to be a diligent and conscientious teacher who engages
students in exciting lessons that are well aligned to the curriculum. Savannah keeps a calm demeanor and treats all students with
great respect. In the times that I observed her, both formally and informally, she proved to be well planned with lessons requiring
higher order thinking, proactive in anticipating student questions and management concerns, and balanced a variety of
differentiated activities in the room on a regular basis. In my various observations, I saw her team teaching with perfection and
solo teaching with great impact. Savannah will certainly an asset to any school that chooses to hire her!
__________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________
Cooperating Teacher Signature / Date Student Teacher Signature / Date
(In accordance with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, this form is considered to be part of an open file and hence is accessible to the student. The students
signature indicates that this evaluation was read. It does not necessarily imply agreement. A separate statement may be attached.) (7/23/16)
Aligned with Danielsons A Framework for Teaching, InTASC Standards, and Michigans Code of Ethics 18