Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COE II
275/COE/14
KISLAYA RANJAN
Table of Content
What is motivation?
Technical Terms
Laymans Terms
Intrinsic/Internal motivation
Advantages
Disadvantages
External/Extrinsic motivation
Advantages
Disadvantages
Criticisms
Psychological needs
Safety needs
Love/ Belonging
Esteem
Self-actualization
Theory X
Hard Approach
Soft Approach
Theory Y
How to use the theory for different people with different motivators
Bibliography
What is motivation?
Technical Terms
Laymans Terms
Motivation is quite literally the longing/desire to do things. Its the difference between a lazy
morning when you start questioning the worth of attending morning classes and mornings during
exam season. Its a pivotal element in setting and attaining goals. As another example to elucidate the
guiding nature of motivation behind our actions, consider the case when a person is hungry, he or she
may choose to eat a salad rather than a big juicy burger because he or she wants to be slimmer. As an
analogy motivation is to us what fuel is to a car. If the fuel reduces you must be cautious and still
ensure that the efficiency of the car if maintained. Else the car might just get damaged and totally
come to a halt. Or even if the fuel is totally dry, the car comes to a halt. Either ways it is not good.
Same way if you do not stay motivated, you will not be able to sustain the power to continue what you
are doing.
Internal/Intrinsic Motivation
It is the self desire to learn new things, to explore ones own intellectual limitations, to
observe and to gain knowledge. It is generally driven by pleasure or engrossment in the task itself.
Unlike external motivation it is independent of superficial factors and pressures as it exists within a
person. This is similar to Ikigai, which is a Japanese concept meaning a reason for being. Everyone,
according to the Japanese has an Ikigai. Search for Ikigai requires introspection and is held in high
regard as it is believed to bring a sense of fulfilment and meaning to life. In a TED Talk, Dan Buettner
suggested ikigai as one of the reasons people in the area had such long lives. This phenomenon was
first recognized while conducting behavioural experiments on animals, particularly mice. In one such
experiment mice were placed in a maze and given incentives (like cheese) to go through the maze. It
was acknowledged that some mice were inquisitive even after the incentives were taken away. It was
evident that the organisms would engage in playful and curiosity driven behaviours in the absence of
reward. This along with other conclusive evidences made it apparent that intrinsic motivation is a
natural phenomenon and is a pivotal element in social, physical, and cognitive development as an
individual. An instance of internal or intrinsic motivation is when a person becomes an Information
Technology professional because he or she wants to learn about how computer users interact with
computer networks. The employee has the intrinsic motivation to gain more knowledge.
It can be slow
It may require long preparations
External/Extrinsic Motivation
External motivation concerns itself with if-then rewards along with other
circumstantial factors to drive a person to do a certain task. The external motivation of a high
grade compels me to write this assignment with signature finesse. Another example may help
elucidate this concept. A boy who was failing in studies, not doing so well suddenly started
getting very high grades in school and also started showing lot of interest in studying. The
reason was found that the boys father suddenly passed away. And he was the bread winner
for the family. His fathers death acted a powerful motivator for that boy. However it is not a
must that painful events must happen in our lives but before it happens if we take control of
ourselves then we become better.
Herzberg collected data by conducting interviews with 203 engineers and accountants in
the Pittsburgh area, chosen because of their professions' growing importance in the business world.
When quizzed about the process, Herzberg stated that the respondents were asked to briefly describe
periods in their lives when they felt exceedingly happy and unhappy with their jobs. Each interviewee
gave as many sequence of events as he could to meet a certain threshold. He summarized that his
proposed hypothesis had been verified.
The factors on the right that led to satisfaction (achievement, intrinsic interest in the work,
responsibility, and advancement) are mostly unipolar; that is, they contribute very little to
job dissatisfaction. Conversely, the dis-satisfiers (company policy and administrative
practices, supervision, interpersonal relationships, working conditions, and salary) contribute
very little to job satisfaction.
Herzberg, 1964[3]
After analysing the available data, he found that factors related to what an individual does
i.e., to the nature of the work one performs have the ability to pacify such needs as status,
competency, personal worth, achievement, and self-realization, thus making him pleased and
gratified. However, the absence or exclusion of aforementioned factors does not lead to unhappiness
and dissatisfaction. Instead, malaise results from critical assessment of factors such as technical
problems, company policies, working conditions and, pay. Two-factor theory essentially distinguishes
between Motivators that give gratification, arising from internal environment of the job itself, and
Hygiene factors that do not give positive satisfaction , though their exclusion results in gross
dissatisfaction.
The four possible combinations according to the two-factor theory are:
High Hygiene + High Motivation: This represents a utopian environment where every
individual is highly motivated and has few complaints.
High Hygiene + Low Motivation: People put in their efforts just for the pay without many
complains.
Low Hygiene + High Motivation: This represents a challenging job where the pay does not
match up to the standard of work demanded
Low Hygiene + Low Motivation: This represents a dystopian environment where employees
are not motivated and have many complaints.
Criticisms
Critics question the implicit assumption that happy and satisfied workers are more productive.
This is because criteria of satisfaction may vary from person to person. Consider a person who wants
to play golf but is stuck doing some other desk job. He will end up thinking more about golf than
about his work at hand, perhaps resulting in a lower output on the job due to a lower amount of focus.
Another problem is that these and other statistical theories are concerned with explaining "average"
behaviour, despite considerable differences between individuals that may impact one's motivational
factors. For instance, in their pursuit of status a person might take a balanced view and strive to
pursue several behavioural paths in an effort to achieve a combination of personal status objectives.
Maslows hierarchy of needs
Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a theory by Abraham Maslow that first appeared in the 1943
paper labelled "A Theory of Human Motivation" in Psychological Review. Maslow subsequently
extended the idea to include his observations of humans' innate curiosity. Maslow studied the
healthiest 1% of college students and exemplary personalities like Albert Einstein, Frederick
Douglass, and Eleanor Roosevelt. He disregarded mentally ill or neurotic people from his studies
stating that a study of stunted, crippled, immature and unhealthy specimens could only yield a
crippled and unhealthy psychology and philosophy.
The theory of needs has a simple agenda, to climb up the pyramid of needs and attain self-
actualization, a state of complete intellectual, spiritual and creative gratification. Maslow
acknowledged that the human mind is rather complex, thus many different motivations may be in
action at the same time. However, he also stated that amongst these needs there is a need that trumps
all the other. He instead focused on identifying the basic types of motivation and the priority that
should logically be assigned to them.
Physiological needs
These needs are the fundamental physical requirements for human survival. If any of these
requisites is not met, the human body ceases to function properly and will inevitably fail.
Physiological needs are deemed to be the most important needs of the bunch hence it finds its place at
the bottom of the pyramid. Clean air, adequate water supply, and food are some examples of
metabolic requirements for survival common to all animals and which qualify as physiological needs.
Safety needs
These needs form the second layer of the pyramid. Once a persons physiological needs are
adequately met, their safety needs take precedence and dominate behaviour. Safety needs is a broad
term which encompasses personal, financial, health needs. For a person to climb up the ladder he or
she must have a secure/ stable job, must live around a healthy environment apt for holistic
development as an individual.
Love and belonging
Man is a social creature. His actions are compelled by the need to socialize and fraternize.
After the lower levels of the pyramid of needs have been attained the need for love and belonging
takes the wheel. This need is more apparent in children and can override the need for safety. Many
people when deprived of these conditions develop disorders such as social anxiety, loneliness, and
clinical depression.
Esteem
Esteem represents the stereotypical human disposition to crave acceptance. People often
engage in a profession or hobby to gain recognition. Deprivation of these needs may lead to
weakness, inferiority complex and helplessness.
Self-actualization
This need refers to ones desire to tap into ones full inner potential and realization of that
potential. Maslow described this level as the desire to attain everything that one can, to become the
best that one can become. As previously mentioned, Maslow restates that to comprehend this level of
need, the person must master all the needs specified in the lower layers of the pyramid.
Theory Y Assumptions:
People will naturally themselves put a lot effort into their work.
People will prefer self-direction and self-control and are committed towards a goal.
People will be committed to the organization if they are satisfied and happy from their work.
People appreciate and seek responsibility, like being in charge.
People are good at creative problem-solving
People are normally underused and their talent wasted.
Theory Y managers are democratic, advice-giving and empowering, helping people to develop
themselves and encourage them to take the initiative of their own. These managers tend to achieve
the best results from their teams.
Some more recent studies have questioned the validity of the model. However, the basic principle of
the model remains valid. Although a strict style of leadership is occasionally necessary, in crisis
situations for example, the positive and participative Theory Y style is generally accepted as more
effective for motivating people. People will contribute more to their job and organization if they are
treated as responsible and valued employees and are given challenging work.
DAVID McCLELLANDS THEORY OF ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION/
THREE NEEDS THEORY
In the early 1940s, Abraham Maslow created a theory known as theory of needs. David McClelland
built on his work and structured a needs based motivational model. In his work he talks about the
three motivators that he had discovered, namely: a need for achievement, a need for affiliation and a
need for power. McClelland believes that everybody possesses each of these motivators in some
proportion with one of them being the dominant one. The fraction of these motivators decides the
characteristics of a person.
1. Achievement:
a. peckish for leadership roles
b. strong need for feedback for personal satisfaction
c. capable of taking risks to accomplish more goals in less time
d. not a good team spirit
2. Affiliation:
a. Always in need of acceptance from other people
b. Make friendly relationships easily
c. Regard team spirit as important
d. Uncomfortable in attracting attention in the crowd
e. Favour common opinion rather than high risks
3. Power:
a. Want to control everything as opposed to taking a back seat
b. They hold their pride in high regard
c. They lack in inter personal skills
d. They thrive in heated arguments and competitions
e. Want to make an impact on their own rather than following someone elses
footprints
How to use the theory for different people with different motivators
Bibliography
Khanna, O. P. (1980). Industrial engineering and management. Delhi: Dhanpat Rai.
T. (2009). The puzzle of motivation | Dan Pink. Retrieved November 01, 2016, from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrkrvAUbU9Y
Why Do You Need Motivation In Life? (n.d.). Retrieved November 01, 2016, from
http://www.streetdirectory.com/travel_guide/107290/life_fear_and_attitude/why_do_you_need_motiv
ation_in_life.html
Ph.D., B. D., M.D., B. R., Ph.D., B. L., & Sisgold, B. S. (n.d.). Psychology Today. Retrieved
November 01, 2016, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/motivation