You are on page 1of 5

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:
Rating Period:
MFO KEY RESULT OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Actual Result RATING SCORE
AREA PER Q E T AVE.
KRA

Basic Teaching- 40%


Educati Learning a) Prepared 120 daily June 2015- 5- prepared 156 & more daily
on Process lesson logs of March 2016 lesson logs of activities
15%
4- prepared 138-155 daily
Service activities out of 160
lesson logs of activities
required in a year. 3- prepared 120-137 daily
lesson logs of activities
2- prepared 61-119 daily
lesson logs of activities
1 prepared 60 & less daily
- lesson logs of activities

b) Monitored daily June 2015- 13% 5 monitored attendance five


attendance in all March 2016 - times in a week with
sections handled. evidences
4 monitored attendance four
- times in a week with
evidences
3 monitored attendance three
- in a week with evidences
2 monitored attendance twice
- a week with evidences
monitored attendance once
1- a week with evidence

c) Facilitated learning June 2015- 12% 5 facilitated 4 different


using four(4) March 2016 - classroom activities
different classroom facilitated 3 different
4- classroom activities
activities per
facilitated 2 different
grading period
3- classroom activities
facilitated 1 different
2- classroom activities
1- no activity facilitated
Learners 30%
Outcomes
a) Increased NAT result by March 2016 8% 5 increased NAT result by
2% over the previous. - 2% & above
4 increased NAT result by
- 1%
3 0
-
2 decreased by 1%
-
decreased by 1%
1-
b) Reduced drop out rate June 2015- 8% 5 2% & below or zero drop out
in sections handled by March 2016 - for SY 2014-2015.
2% for SY 2015-2016. 4 3% reduced drop out or 3-
- student drop out for SY
2014-2015.
3 4% reduced drop out or 4-
- student drop out for SY
2014-2015
2 5% reduced drop out or 5-
- student drop out for SY
2014-2015
6% or more reduced drop
1- out or 6 or more
student drop out for SY
2014-2015
c) Attained 100% March 2016 14% 5 91.53 and above promotion
Promotion Rate - rate
4 90.5 91.52 promotion
- rate
3 89.5 90.49 promotion rate
-
2 88.5 89.49 promotion
- rate
88.48 and below promotion
1- rate
10%
Professional
Growth a) Submitted reports on June 2015- 4% 5 role model
time. March 2016 -
4 consistently demonstrates
-
3 most of the time
- demonstrates
2 sometimes demonstrates
-
1 rarely demonstrates
-

b) Supported and June 2015- 4% b 5 supported and participated


participated all required March 2016 - all required school
school trainings, trainings, seminars and
seminars and community activities with
evidences
community activities
4 supported and participated
and events in SY 2015- - 90% school trainings,
2016. seminars and community
activities with evidences
3 supported and participated
- 75% school trainings,
seminars and community
activities with evidences
2 supported and participated
- 50% school trainings,
seminars and community
activities with evidences
1 never supported and
- participated required sch
& comm. activities and
events
c) Observed and June 2015- 2% 5 No absent/no tardy
implemented WATCH. March 2016 -
4 5 days absent/5 days tardy
-
3 10 days absent/10 days
- tardy
2 15 days absent/15 days
- tardy
1 20 days absent/20 days
- tardy

20%
Community a) Supported all GPTA
5- supported all GPTA programs
Involvement programs projects. June 2015- 10%
and projects
March 2016 4- supported 4 GPTA programs
and projects
3- supported 3 GPTA programs
and projects
2- supported 2 GPTA programs
and projects
1- supported 1 GPTA program
and project

b) Partipated in all June 2015- 5% 5 partipated in all required


required community March 2016 - community activities
activities. 4 partipated 4 required
- community activities
3 partipated 3 required
- community activities
2 partipated 2 required
- community activities
1 partipated 1 required
- community activity

c) Conducted home June 2015- 5% 5 conducted 4 & above home


visitation and or March 2016 - visits & dialogue with
dialogue with parents. parents
4 conducted 3 home visits &
- dialogue with parents
3 conducted 2 home visits &
- dialogue with parents
2 conducted 1 home visit &
- dialogue with parents
1 no meetings conducted
-
*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned. OVERALL RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENT

____________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________


Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like