In the story Slip or Trip the wife Queenie is in front of the dead husband .

She
has claim to see everything that happen upon his death. She seems more like the
murder than a alibi.
To start off she has very little behavior of seeing his husband dead. She has no
real emotion like she was expecting it to happen to him. The way she is precision is also
a dead give away. If you experiencing that happening to your husband you would be
freaking out and not putting your hand on you mouth.
Continuing is that behind them is a cooking stove. This is very suspicious
because of the fact it is almost ready from the steam. She could have use this as a
weapon by hitting him with the frying pan and moving his body with the adrenaline that
is in her body and to hide to evidence of her fingerprints and the bump of the head in
the pan.
Most suspiciously is the that everything is neat! The floors are neat the mirror is
still right side up and even the victim is neat. The robe is in place the, positions of him is
neat, not even a hair is out of place. Such as before she could have knock him out and
moved him with her adrenaline.
All the clues fit together. The lack of expression the food cooking and even the
neatness of the place. This is leading to one conclusion. That Queenie killed her
husband. I rest my case.

Advanced Proficient Partially Proficient

Introduction Lead is a grabber or offers
*Lead/grabber background information,
*Claim/Thesis along with a clear claim
Includes all necessary titles
and names, referenced
correctly
Includes a lead
Claim is clear and answers the
prompt
References titles and authors of
literature in question; or
necessary background
information
Claim just repeats the prompt, no
clear claim, or does not answer
the prompt
Does not include titles
Includes reasons or evidence in
the claim, pronouns, I think
statements

Body More than 3 specific
*Reasons reasons support the claim
*Evidence (text Specific, compelling text
support, evidence for each reason
details) includes a mix of cited
(quoted) and paraphrased
*Justification text
Provides justification for how
the reasons and text
evidence support the claim
and elaborates beyond the
obvious
Maintains clear order, logic
and high-level transition
words between reasons
3 specific reasons support the
claim
Specific text evidence is
provided for each reason
Provides justification for how
the reasons and text evidence
support the claim
Maintains order, logic and/or
transition words between
reasons
Less than 3 specific reasons
support the claim
Specific text evidence not
provided for each reason
Little or no justification for how the
reasons and text evidence support
the claim
Maintains little or no order, logic or
transition words between reasons

Style and Advanced, precise Vocabulary appropriate for General word choice; occasional
Fluency vocabulary appropriate for audience and purpose errors in word usage
audience and purpose
 Lots of descriptive
language: active verbs,
figurative language,
imagery, effective
adjectives
Fluent variety of sentence
beginnings, structures,
length
Legible, neat, and error-free
Conclusion Ties the claim to a larger
idea: self, the world, other
literature
Some descriptive language:
active verbs, figurative
language, imagery, adjectives
Some variety of sentence
beginnings, structures, and
length
Mostly legible, neat, and error-
free
Ties the claim to a larger idea
but is clumsy or forced.
Mostly common or dead verbs (is,
did, go), imprecise or colorless
verbs or adjectives, common
phrases
Little variety of sentence
beginnings, structure, or length;
contains run-on or incomplete
sentences
Sloppy or full of errors
Repeats the claim statement or
the supports
No conclusion