Cures, Health & Wellbeing

For similar reasons as with supressed science, there are important facts and simple treatments for many dis-eases that are
kept from the mass population.

For example, Jim Humble and his MMS Protocols have treated many thousands of people in Africa and around the world,
annihilating diseases such as malaria, cancer and aids and yet you will not hear anything about these simple treatments in
the media - other than disinformation.

The multi-billion dollar medical science and pharmaceutical industries profit from 'treating' diseases, not symptoms and their
treatments are highly ineffective - other than for generating enormous profits.

"The drug companies, with the help of the scientific community, have created a scientific truth that ensures they will have
no competition. And unfortunately they are the group that doesnt want well people; they want the money that comes from
sick people. If you cure a sick person, he wont pay you any more money. That is a self-evident truth that the laymen of the
world do not seem to consider.

Dont you think it is kind of funny that after 100 years of the new scientific modern technology, not one single cure for a
single disease has ever been found? Doesnt it seem crazy that the exact same cancer treatments have been in use, with
no practical improvements, for 100 years, and still less than 3% of patients recover?" - Jim Humble

There are other reasons relating to the elite's fear of over population and a strong desire on their part to control the size of
the human race.

Forbidden Cures

"There are a number of alternative healing therapies that work so well and cost so little (compared to conventional
treatment), that Organized Medicine , the Food & Drug Administration, and their overlords in the Pharmaceutical
Industry (The Big Three) would rather the public not know about them. The reason is obvious: Alternative, non-toxic
therapies represent a potential loss of billions of dollars to allopathic (drug) medicine and drug companies.

The Big Three have collectively engaged in a medical conspiracy for the better part of 70 years to influence legislative
bodies on both the state and federal level to create regulations that promote the use of drug medicine while simultaneously
creating restrictive, controlling mechanisms (licencing, government approval, etc) designed to limit and stifle the availability
of non-drug, alternative modalities. The conspiracy to limit and eliminate competition from non-drug therapies began with
the Flexner Report of 1910 ." - EducateYourself.org

Make sure you read this information on Forbidden Cures on EducateYourself.org

MMS and Jim Humble

With personal experience of the amazing power of MMS this is something that
I can thoroughly recommend to anyone for an enormous range of diseases and
ailments. The reason why the MMS Protocols are so powerful is because while
it is not a cure in and of itself, it provides the immune system with what it needs
to be able to fight off virtually any disease caused by pathogens, bacteria and
viruses.

In a world where our bodies are constantly under attack from toxic chemicals
and additives in our water and food, the benefits of MMS effecetively
super-charging your immune system are quite simply incredible.

This is how the MMS Protocols are able to effectively cure severe diseases including
most types of cancer and even engineered viruses such as AIDS and H1N1.

To learn more about Jim Humble and MMS, visit www.miraclemineral.org.

I highly recommend purchasing his e-book, "The Master Mineral of the Third
Millenium". It provides comprehensive information on how and why MMS works, how
to make it and many protocols for treating a wide range of diseases.

MMS is available in many countries, despite attempts to discredit and shut it down by the authorities. I have been cautioned
that there are some online suppliers who are not particularly trustworthy so I would suggest doing your research before
purchasing from any particular online seller.
I am happy to recommend two New Zealand based suppliers to anyone, please send us an email.

Hydrogen Peroxide

Hydrogen peroxide treatment is similar to MMS treatments but not as powerful. It has been around for decades and there
are good sources of information online.

Check out this article about Hydrogen Peroxide on EducateYourself.org

Also, see this online book "The One Minute Cure".

MMS / Jim Humble Updates

May 19 2012 - Health Discoveries That Can Change the Health of Mankind
May 31 2012 - What is Going to Save Mankind?

These update documents are emails sent to anyone who would like to sunscribe to them: www.miraclemineral.org.

Vaccines Uncensored

Related: Healing from Vaccine Injuries through Homeopathy

A storehouse of information, proof and truth about the lies regarding vaccinations. The claim that vaccination has wiped out
deadly scourges has reached legendary status. But are these claims backed by historical records or do they represent the
most deceptive and successful public relations coup in the history of the medical industrial complex?

And if vaccines-and not better sanitation etc. saved humanity from disease, then where are today's epidemic of Scarlet
Fever victims for which no vaccine was ever administered? It is also imperative to understand that the definition + diagnosis
of polio was dramatically changed when the polio vaccine was introduced, further manipulating
statistics. VaccinesUncensored.com

Outspoken Vaccine Skeptic, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. To Head Federal Vaccine

Commission
January 13 2017 | From: TheFreeThoughtProject / Various

President-elect Donald Trump has undoubtedly ruffled feathers in staffing his administration, but
the choice of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. - known for his skepticism on the safety of vaccines - to chair
a commission tasked with studying the efficacy of and issues concerning vaccinations, will
undoubtedly raise eyebrows from both sides of the issue.
Kennedy, according to USA Today, will chair the presidential commission to make sure we have scientific integrity
in the vaccine process for efficacy and safety effects, the environmental activist and politician told reporters after
meeting with Trump on Tuesday.

Related: Trump Asks Critic of Vaccines to Lead Vaccine Safety Panel

Kennedy noted the incoming president requested the meeting, as he has some doubts about the current vaccine
policies and he has questions about it. His opinion doesnt matter, but the science does matter and we ought to be
reading the science and we ought to be debating the science.

While advocates of the heavy vaccination schedule might find the choice of Kennedy - who has been castigated as an anti-
vaxxer - quite startling, he insisted Trump remains very pro-vaccine, as am I, and only seeks to ensure theyre as safe as
they can possibly be.
Related: Robert F. Kennedy Jr On Vaccines: Big Pharma Has Captured The Scientific, Regulatory, Law-Making
Processes

Corporate media hastily attacked the appointment of a skeptic to such an important commission; however, Kennedy insisted
in the press conference public health and safety remains the topic of concern.

President-elect Trump has some doubts about the current vaccine policies and he has questions about
it, Kennedy said, as reported by NBC News. He says his opinion doesnt matter but the science does matter,
and we ought to be reading the science and we ought to be debating the science.

Vaccination has frequently been a topic of bitter public dispute over the last few years, as parents of autistic children have
pegged the ingredient thimerosal - which, in part, contains notoriously toxic mercury - as the culprit for the affliction.

President-elect Trump has, himself, spoken out about blindly supporting a medical practice without thorough and long-term
investigation, as he stated in 2015 during a Republican primary debate;

I am totally in favor of vaccines. But I want smaller doses over a longer period of time. Same exact amount, but
you take this little beautiful baby, and you pump - I mean, it looks just like its meant for a horse, not for a child, and
weve had so many instances, people that work for me. [in which] a child, a beautiful child went to have the
vaccine, and came back and a week later had a tremendous fever, got very, very sick, now is autistic.

Countless anecdotal cases of the onset of autism coincidentally following a certain round of vaccinations have left a growing
population of parents excoriating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for failing to diligently investigate effects of
contents of certain vaccines.
Related: Vaccine efficacy: Junk science at its worst

For its part, the CDC scoffs at such comparisons and has painted the anti-vaxx movement - and anyone daring to question
vaccination - under the broad brush of hysterics.

Research does not show any link between thimerosal in vaccines and autism, a neurodevelopmental
disorder, the CDCs website advises - and the conglomerate agency has ostensibly debunked the autism link
numerous times.

A vocal movement of parents whose childrens autism abruptly took hold after immunization, however, find grave fault with
the CDCs failure to at least address their concerns.

Autism Speaks, an advocacy organization for individuals with autism, which aligns with the CDC, told NBC News in a
statement, Over the last two decades, extensive research has asked whether there is any link between childhood
vaccinations and autism. The results of this research are clear: Vaccines do not cause autism.

Kennedy stated about vaccines at a documentary screening on the subject in 2015;

They get the shot, that night they have a fever of a hundred and three, they go to sleep, and three months
later their brain is gone. This is a holocaust, what this is doing to our country.

Coming under intense backlash for the capricious use of that term, Kennedy later apologized, stating,
I employed the term during an impromptu speech as I struggled to find an expression to convey the catastrophic tragedy of
autism which has now destroyed the lives of over 20 million children and shattered their families.

Indeed, with the growing pandemic of autism - and the increased number of immunizations deemed necessary through
childhood - it would seem the appointment of someone who finds safety and study relevant would be crucial to the interest
of public health.

Related: The Shaken Baby Martyr: Top brain doctor who was struck off for controversial claims speaks out on how
jailed parents could be innocent

Kennedy is not, as the mainstream portrays, an unabashed anti-vaxxer - rather, he would like further study to prove or
disprove either side in the issue.

After all, as the new chair of the presidential commission to study vaccines, Kennedy said in 2015;

They can put anything they want in that vaccine and they have no accountability for it.

Perhaps more imperative than sounding alarms over skepticism, it would behoove the public to give Kennedys commission
a chance to either prove vaccinations safe and viable - or deleterious to the children theyre supposed to immunize from
disease.

Related Articles:

A New Billboard Reminds Parents Vaccines Can Kill Their Baby

Vaccine court confirms healthy 13 year-old boy was made tetraplegic by the chicken pox vaccine

Bill Gates quietly funding effort to develop thousands of new vaccines that conveniently might become
pandemics

SIRVA: A Risk With Every Vaccine

Cleveland clinic doctor goes full anti-vaccine

10-month-old suddenly suffers 14 seizures a day after receiving new meningitis vaccine, video spreads
awareness
 Head Holistic MD at Cleveland Clinic Threatened By Hospital For Writing Vaccine Danger Piece

Pharmaceutical Company Misleads Consumers, Caught In Painkiller Scam + Painkiller

Drugs More Fatal Than Heroin Or Cocaine
January 10 2017 | From: NaturalSociety / AustralianNationalReview

Drug giant Reckitt Benckiser was ordered by the Australian Federal Court to pull its so-called
targeted ibuprofen products off the shelves after the company admitted that these were identical
to the standard tablets.

Marketed under the name Nurofen, all products contained 200mg of ibuprofen, whether they were labelled as
standard, migraine, period pain, or back pain.

Related: DA Deliberately Conceals Fraudulent Studies Regarding Drugs

The specific products are about double the price of standard Nurofen. Fortunately, the court ordered that the specific
tablets be removed from Australian shops within 3 months, with a subsequent hearing planned to decide on a possible
fine. This ruling followed legal action by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission in a rare victory
over the pharmaceutical industry.

The Nurofen line is also sold in the UK and New Zealand, but the British governments MHRA said there was no concern, as
it is not involved in the control over pricing. The company has also been ordered to pay the ACCCs legal costs, explain
itself to the public, and implement a consumer protection compliance program.

5 Alternative Pain Solutions

But what are some natural alternatives to ibuprofen?

In one clinical trial involving 150 female students, different groups were prescribed either 250mg of ginger powder, 250g of
mefenamic acid, or 400mg of ibuprofen, 4 times daily for the first 3 days of their menstrual period. Check out other health
benefits of ginger here.
The severity of their pain decreased in all groups, and there was no difference between the three groups in severity, pain
relief, or satisfaction with the treatment. Ginger is an anti-inflammatory as well as a circulatory stimulant, and has not been
associated with the side effects caused by ibuprofen.

Another study involving 204 patients with osteoarthritis compared the benefits of arnica (one of 5 natural pain
relievers we mentioned before) and ibuprofen, both as gel preparations, prescribed for 21 days.

In terms of pain and hand function, there were no differences between the two treatment groups, but there were slightly less
adverse effects reported by the arnica group, at 5 patients instead of 6.

Additionally, fish oil can be an alternative to pharmaceutical painkillers. Over three months, 250 patients with osteoarthritis
took either 1200mg (78% of participants) or 2400mg (22%) of the omega-3 fatty acids found in fish (EPA and DHA).

Fifty-nine percent of all patients stopped taking their prescription NSAID drugs for pain, while 60% said their overall pain
improved, and 60% again said their joint pain improved.
Eighty percent said they were satisfied with their improvement and 88% stated they would keep taking the fish oil. No
significant side effects were reported from the fish oil either.

While still illegal in most areas, cannabis is an increasingly popular natural alternative to pain of all levels of severity. In fact,
standardized extracts of cannabinoids such as Sativex have been approved in some regions for pain conditions including
neuropathic pain from multiple sclerosis and intractable cancer pain.

THC, which is responsible for the high of cannabis, has many anti-inflammatory mechanisms of action which contribute to
pain relief, including PGE-2 inhibition and decreased platelet aggregation.

It has 20x the anti-inflammatory potency of aspirin, and twice that of the steroid hydrocortisone, but without the horrible,
disfiguring side effects. CBD, which is antipsychotic and gives no high, relieves pain by the same mechanism as capsaicin,
as well as being anti-inflammatory by inhibiting TNF-alpha and by its antioxidant abilities.
Other cannabinoids, such as CBG and CBC, have their own painkilling properties.

With all of these alternatives and others, why support a dishonest corporation and aid them in paying for their well-deserved
legal costs?

Related: Big Pharma Dangerous Drugs and Drug-Injured Patients - Confessions of a "Medical Heretic"

Painkiller Drugs More Fatal Than Heroin Or Cocaine

A research conducted by a reputed pathologist has revealed that a prescription painkiller is taking
more lives than Class A narcotics like Heroin and Cocaine.
Prof Jack Crane of Ireland has said that the Tramadol painkiller is killing more people than any other drug and will
therefore be included in the Class A category.

Related: Non-Addictive Natural Pain Killer Kratom Relieves Chronic Pain, Depression - Leave Rx Drugs Behind

The UK has Tramadol listed in Class C drugs, which are considered the least harmful. If Tramadol is taken with alcohol or
other drugs, it can have life threatening effects. Tramadol is prescribed for medium to severe pain for patients.

Crane emphasises on the risks of Tramadol and suggests that it needs strict regulation. While many people in the UK are
illegally trying to acquire the drug, Crane feels that if Governments and law enforcement do not actively try to regulate illegal
Tramadol sales, it could cost many lives.

The report by Crane is revealed in opportune time with cannabis activists trying to legalise medicinal cannabis use and
growth under license.
A West Briton report revealed that Tramadol had claimed 20 lives in the UK in 2014.

In the USA, many patients have opioid addictions. A recent report by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Administrations revealed that a large number of Americans abused prescription painkillers.

1 out of 20 Americans above the age of 12 used psychotherapy drugs at some point. Many people blame Obamacare
policies for such drug and opium usage. The laws of Obamacare reimburse the fees of the patients depending on the
satisfaction the patient had during his or her stay at the hospital.

It is a rather tough choice for doctors and hospitals where on the one hand your reimbursement is on the line and on the
other hand you are fuelling psychotherapeutic drug addiction among your patients.

The Top 10 Most Outrageous Science Hoaxes Of 2016

January 2 2017 | From: NaturalNews

Science hoaxes were running rampant throughout 2016, pushed by the fakestream media (CNN,
WashPost, NYT, etc.) alongside complicit government organizations working in collusion with
dishonest corporations steeped in scientific fraud (Monsanto, Big Pharma, etc.).
2016 saw more science hoaxes than a typical year, with the media placing special emphasis on the Zika virus terror
campaign (rooted in total scientific hucksterism) and more climate change propaganda (all based on fraudulently
altered data).

Related: Seeding Doubt: How Self-Appointed Guardians Of Sound Science Tip The Scales Toward Industry

In every case, those pushing the science frauds claimed to have a divine monopoly on science while declaring all opposing
views to be unscientific.

In this way, much of the science in todays corrupt society has really become nothing more than a cult of scientism,
complete with faith in the correctness of socially-reinforced beliefs while exercising instant rejection of evidence that
contradicts the fairy tale narratives of the science elite.

Sadly, science in 2016 functioned more like a priesthood of dogmatists fervently demanding the obedient worship of
their unassailable assumptions. On every issue that matters, data were thrown out the window and replaced with fraud.
Related: The Cult Of 'Scientism' Explained: How Scientific Claims Behind Cancer, Vaccines, Psychiatric Drugs And
GMOs Are Nothing More Than Corporate-Funded Science Fraud

To drive home the fraud, the scientifically illiterate lamestream media catapulted the propaganda to new heights, even
while remaining completely oblivious to the laughably false science they were promoting.

Here, I offer a summary of the most outrageous science hoaxes of 2016, along with a few links where you can explore more.
By the way, the video on the Cicret bracelet invention that claims to turn your arm into a mobile device touchscreen is
also a complete fraudulent hoax that has fooled millions of people, and I cover that in detail at the bottom of this article.

My primary message for 2017 is to stop believing in all the fake science being pushed by media, governments, academia
and corporate liars.

Science Hoax #1: Scientific Political Polling

Through the entire year, we were all subjected to an endless onslaught of so-called scientific political polls that almost
universally showed Hillary Clinton would win the election.

All the scientific polls were wrong, it turns out. (And yes, I called all this well before the election, on the record.)

What we now know is that the word scientific was slapped onto these fraudulent polls to try to give them an aura of
credibility when, in reality, they were all fabricated or distorted to give Hillary Clinton the appearance of certain victory.
But guess what? All the experts were wrong. But how is that possible if all these polls were scientific as claimed? Are the
pollsters now telling us that science is broken?

Or maybe, just maybe, they were making s##t up all along and there wasnt any real science behind the
scientific claim in the first place.

Science Hoax #2: The Zika Virus Terror Campaign

2016 saw the rolling out of an elaborate media-fronted Zika terror campaign designed to scare the entire country into
ridiculously believing that mosquito bites would cause millions of women in America to give birth to babies with shrunken
heads.

Yeah, I know, it sounds like something a Batman villain would threaten to unleash in Gotham City. Pay me one million
dollars or all your babies will be born with shrunken heads! Mwuah hah hah!
Related: Whos Behind The Zika Virus Outbreak & Fearmongering?

But, alas, the American sheeple bought the medical science hoax hook, line and sinker. Belief in the Zika virus microcephaly
hoax was so deeply embedded in the psyche of the nation that even when the Washington Post published a story admitting
there was no link after all, the vast majority of so-called scientists and doctors still believe the hoax!

So, for the record, Ill say it again in the hopes of educating all the scientifically illiterate scientists who still dont understand
actual facts: The original wave of shrunken heads in Brazil was caused by a larvacide chemical that was dumped into
the water supply, not by the Zika virus alone.

The Zika apocalypse predicted by all the doctors, scientists and TV talking heads simply did not materialize. And when
evidence contradicts your theory, you have to start questioning your theory. Otherwise, you arent a scientist. Youre just a
petty fool.

Science Hoax #3: The Flint Michigan Lead Poisoning Cover-Up

In order to poison a million black children with brain-damaging lead, the U.S. EPA masterminded a large-scale science fraud
that deliberately altered heavy metals testing results for the Flint, Michigan water supply.

Eventually, a few of the science scapegoats were charged with felony crimes for engaging in a conspiracy to alter water
quality test data, but no one from the EPA was ever charged or prosecuted for their role in the scheme. (This also proves, by
the way, that conspiracies are quite real and very much alive in our society right now.)
The result of all this was the mass poisoning of mostly African-American children with a toxic heavy metal thats well known
to damage cognitive function and impede learning.What a great way to raise more democrats!

Its all part of the new science of keeping the sheeple dumbed down so they will keep voting for corrupt criminals
like Hillary Clinton.

Instead of let them eat cake, the new progressive Jon Podesta version is, Let them drink lead!

Science Hoax #4: The Banning of GMO Labeling Nationwide by Scientifically Illiterate
Republicans

In the name of science, Republican lawmakers passed the so-called DARK Act to outlaw honest food labeling of
genetically engineered foods.

Apparently, Republicans believe that knowledge is a dangerous thing in the hands of consumers, therefore preventing
people from knowing what theyre eating is the best solution.
Related: Monsanto Promoting Worldwide Infertility? + Academic GMO Shills Exposed: Fraud & Collusion With
Monsanto

This was all accomplished via an unholy alliance among biotech corporate giants (like Monsanto) and right-leaning
lawmakers, most of whom have never met a toxic chemical they didnt absolutely love.

Notably, while Democrats are passing local laws that criminalize Big Gulp sodas, Republicans are blocking labeling laws as
a way to say, If you dont SEE the poison on the label, it doesnt actually count!

Keeping consumers in the dark is now the official science policy of the federal government.

Hows that for transparency?

Science Hoax #5: Climate Change Data Fraud

Democrats have their own science fraud, of course, and theres no better example than global warming / climate change.

An analysis of climate data reveals that 100% of U.S. warming has been faked by altering temperature data.
Related: Climate Scare Declared Officially Over- Error In Model Calculations Discovered

To the great frustration of celebritards like Matt Damon, the data dont show any warming at all unless you cook the
numbers first.

This means climate change science is actually more like climate change alchemy, which isnt science at all. Its more like
Tarot cards mixed with voodoo blended with AlGoratotalitaritopian idiocy.

Note to intelligent people: If the world were really warming, they wouldnt have to alter the temperature data, would
they?

Science Hoax #6: Abortion Organ Harvesting for Scientific Research

According to leftists, chopping up living human babies who have just been forcibly birthed in order to harvest their organs
and brains isnt unethical at all. Nope, its a tremendous advancement for scientific research, you see.

Organ harvesting isnt just limited to places like Communist China and North Korea: The practice is alive and well in
America, too. But in the U.S., it takes on a genocidal milestone because most abortions are carried out on black babies
yep, the very same black babies that were also intentionally poisoned by the EPA in Flint, Michigan (see above).
Hmmm there seems to be a pattern in all this, but I cant quite put my finger on it but it definitely seems to have
something to do with killing as many black babies as possible while labeling it all science.

Its noteworthy to remember that Adolf Hitlers eugenics programs were also conducted under the umbrella of
science.

It seems not that much has changed in almost 80 years except that instead of Jews being exterminated by the millions,
its now black babies being exterminated by the millions while democrats demand an open borders human blitzkrieg to
replace them all with socialist-leaning illegal aliens who are uninformed enough to vote for leftists.

Science Hoax #7: The California Vaccine Mandate

Another large-scale science hoax that also happens to place a disproportionate burden on African-American babies is the
California medical police state vaccine mandate pushed by Californias own Mercury Joker Dr. Richard Pan.

After receiving bribes from vaccine makers, the medical child molesting California state senator Richard Pan took part in a
media-backed medical terrorism campaign against Californias citizens, attempting to scare everyone into falsely
believing that the best way to protect the health of children is to inject them with mercury (instead of, I dont know,
maybe feeding them nutritious foods and vitamin D).
Related: Doctors Who Discovered Cancer Enzymes In Vaccines All Found Murdered

The entire vaccine mandate was founded on blatantly fraudulent quack science claims fronted by the child-murdering
vaccine industry, which continues to absurdly insist that vaccines pose zero risk to children (i.e. claiming they do not harm a
single childever). The claim is, of course, rooted in sheer delusion. But thats also what passes for legislation in
California.

We can only hope Californias #Calexit effort succeeds soon, so we can build a wall around California and stop the
contagious epidemic of lunacy from spreading Eastward.

Science Hoax #8: Janet Yellens Libtardtopia Economics Science

No summary of science quackery would be complete without bringing in the subject of economics. Yes, it qualifies as a
science at least if you ask the economists. (If you ask non-economists, it qualifies mostly as voodoo.)

Nevertheless, according to Janet Yellen and the decrepit wizards of collapse who are currently steering the global debt
Titanic directly into an array of large shards of icebergs, the best way to keep a global economy in balance is to create
endless new money until the whole thing explodes, at which point the system collapses to equilibrium where
everybody starves roughly the same amount (i.e. Venezuela).

To demonstrate this brilliant hypothesis, Yellen and her crotchety academic cohorts have been busy pumping trillions of fiat
currency dollars into the pockets of their bankster pals while raising interest rates to accelerate the debt avalanche
apocalypse timetable.
Ideally, they hope to trigger the whole thing to come crashing down sometime during Trumps first term. Then, theyll all
express total shock and dismay while pleading to the press that we should all Bring back Obama because he was a
monetary genius! (Or perhaps a radical Muslim sleeper cell working for the communists to subvert America, but thats
another hilarious satire article altogether.)

As a cherry on top, Obama also doubled the national debt in just eight years, all while handing Iran a path to nuclear
weapons, dissing Israel, subverting American culture, gutting the U.S. military and secretly telling his Russian counterparts
he would drastically reduce U.S. nuclear capabilities.

Yes indeed, the dream team of Obama, Clinton and Yellen has pulled off what Americas worst enemies could not: The
near-complete financial paralysis of the U.S. economy all while claiming Everything is awesome!

Thank God all the pensions across the country are fully funded, huh? Or that would be a real disaster.

Science Hoax #9: Transgenderism and the Lunatic Liberal Theory of Spontaneous Genetic
Transmutation

2016 also saw many gullible people being convinced to believe that a biological man can instantly transform himself into a
biological woman by declaring himself to be a woman.

At least one journalist even claimed that a transgendered man could become pregnant after declaring himself to be a
woman. Yes, science education in America has utterly collapsed at this point, replaced with liberal P.C. insanity and
delusional college lesson plans rooted in feelings rather than physical reality.

Across most of todays gender-confused college-educated youth, belief in the laws of genetic expression have been
replaced by belief that a persons sex is a choice. Its no longer permutations, phenotypes and genotypes its now
metrosexual, generation snowflake, pu##ified blathering idiocy with a diploma, safe space cry rooms and $100K in student
debt.
Sorry to burst their bubble of stupid, but sex classification isnt a personal choice. A simple genetic test shows you either
have XY chromosomes, XX chromosomes, or the far more rare extra-X-or-Y chromosome defect which typically leads to
serious physical and mental defects (including infertility).

Somebody please direct gender confused college snowflakes to the National Human Genome Research Institutes fact sheet
page on chromosomes.

According to todays college snowflakes, the National Human Genome Research Institute is a purveyor of HATE because
their fact sheet page says all these mean things about chromosomal defects:

Inheriting too many or not enough copies of sex chromosomes can lead to serious problems. For example,
females who have extra copies of the X chromosome are usually taller than average and some have mental
retardation.

Males with more than one X chromosome have Klinefelter syndrome, which is a condition characterized by tall
stature and, often, impaired fertility. Another syndrome caused by imbalance in the number of sex chromosomes is
Turner syndrome. Women with Turner have one X chromosome only. They are very short, usually do not undergo
puberty and some may have kidney or heart problems.

Thus, there are only two sexes in the biology of all mammals: Male and female. And no, you dont get to change them up
just because you think its trendy to be a gender-confused metrosexual snowflake.

This doesnt mean you cant be gay, by the way. Gay men still realize theyre men. They just choose male partners
instead of female partners. On the spectrum of personal freedom, I say people should be able to partner with
whomever they want.

Gay or straight, its all a personal choice as far as Im concerned, because its none of my business and stop shoving
your sexual preferences in my face, all you militant gay mafia activists.

Just be gay and be done with it. The gay rights war is over, and you already won it. Stop being bullies and thinking
youre still oppressed victims.
Marry whomever you want, but just #STFU about it already. Obama already lit up the White House with rainbows, for Gods
sake.

But to say that yesterday you were a male, but today youre a female now thats just technically bonkers. Youre not really
a female. Youre a male impersonating a female and thats it. Bruce Jenner, take note: You are not a woman, no matter
how much you want to impersonate one.

The greatest insult in all this was when some fashion magazine voted Bruce Jenner Woman of the Year, instantly
declaring that this guy who impersonates a woman is a better woman than all the other women. Dudes with dongs
out-women the women?

And thats celebrated by the women? Yeah, its insane. And all these same progressive women also insist that pervs with
dongs should be able to invade womens restrooms, too, because thats embracing gender identity and inclusiveness
blabbity blah blah.

Get a grip, people. Check your drawers and briefly fondle your hardware. If its junk, youre a dude, and stop playing with it
already. If it isnt, youre a woman. If you have both, go ask a doctor to run a genetic test and find out if you have ovaries.

Science Hoax #10: Every Science Journalist Working for the Fakestream Media

This is more of a collection of hoaxes rather than a single hoax. It all centers around the hilarious fact that most science
journalists are scientifically illiterate morons who only think they understand science.

I remember reading a science column in a major U.S. publication that claimed cell phones could run on water. (Yeah, I
know. I tried that by dropping my cell phone into a glass of water, but it turned off all the power for some strange reason.
Maybe I need special water?)
There has also been a wave of hilariously stupid media coverage for this bracelet computing project called Cicret that
ridiculously claims to turn your arm into a touchscreen.

The entire video promoting this Cicret bracelet is a complete fraud. Racking up almost 25 million views on Youtube, the
video shown here is accomplished purely with special effects overlays. The bracelet does not exist and cannot exist as
depicted in the video for the simple reason that light cannot bend around the curvature of your arm.

Incredibly, countless journalists across the mainstream media fell for this total hoax, stupidly believing that a hi-res
touchscreen rendition can be projected onto your skin from a bracelet that barely sits just a few millimeters above your skin
in the first place.

Question for brain dead science journalists: Do you really believe light rays from the Cicret can bend around your wrist and
then magically bounce off skin that isnt in a direct line of sight with the bracelet projector?

Seriously, you have to be incredibly stupid (or scientifically illiterate) to think the Cicret bracelet, as depicted in the videos,
can actually function. But that sure didnt stop publications from all across the world pushing the hype and convincing their
readers that this cool tech was real.
Related: Western Media Credibility In Free Fall Collapse: Case In Point: UN Peace Council: The US Media Is Lying
To The American people. The War In Syria Is Not A Civil War, It's A Proxy Invasion By The United States

And yes, the younger people are on social media these days, the more gullible they are, too. So special effects viral videos
can be very successful at raising millions of dollars in Kickstarter funds for devices that cannot ever exist because they
violate the laws of physics.

Its a whole new kind of financial scam thats legal because it only extracts money from people who are too stupid enough to
believe the viral videos. In summary, Kickstarter viral videos are a tax on stupid progressives the same way that the lotto
is a tax on stupid conservatives.

And now that Ive thoroughly offended everyone, lets wrap all this up

2016 Was a Bad Year For the Credibility of Real Science Lets Hope 2017 is Better

In summary, 2016 saw the pushing of numerous science hoaxes by the fakestream media, governments, academic
institutions and corporate propaganda whores like Forbes.com. (Oh, and we cant leave out the actual whores running
SNOPES, who were exposed as prostitutes and fetish bloggers.)

So how do we rescue science in 2017? Its simple: We start using science to tell the truth instead of allowing
governments and corporations to use science to lie.

A few fundamental scientific truths Id like to see finally embraced in 2017 would include:

Yes, there is extraterrestrial intelligence in the universe.

Yes, there is (or was) microbial life on Mars.

Yes, human consciousness is non-material and not located in the physical brain.

Yes, vaccines cause autism.

 Yes, flu shots still contain mercury.

Yes, there are many anti-cancer foods that can help prevent cancer.

Yes, transgenderism is a mental disorder, not a choice.

Yes, glyphosate causes cancer.

Yes, DEET is toxic to human neurology.

Yes, genetically engineered crops seeds are a genuine threat to the environment and the food supply.

Yes, water can retain non-physical properties that subtly alter its interactions with living systems.

No, carbon dioxide is not the enemy of mankind.

No, chemotherapy does not cure cancer. It often makes it worse.

No, harvesting organs from living human babies is not ethical science.

No, science journals are not unbiased, objective arbiters of truth.

No, scientific political polls are not reliable. They are bunk.

No, the experts are not as smart as they think they are. Mostly, theyre idiots who have attained high positions
of persistent idiocy in academia or government, and their job is to protect the idiocy for as long as possible,
making sure no one overthrows idiocy with intelligence.

Study: Manuka Honey Kills More Bacteria Than All Available Antibiotics
January 2 2017 | From: NaturalNews

Not all honey is created equal. While the benefits of raw, unprocessed honey have been well-
documented over the centuries, Australian researchers have found one type of honey, called
Manuka honey, to be better than all known antibiotics.
Manuka honey is produced by bees that forage on the nectar of Leptospermum Scoparium, or New Zealands
Manuka bush, as well as tea trees, native to Australia and New Zealand only.

Related: The End of Modern Medicine?

This remarkable type of honey not only effectively kills bacteria, but none of the bugs killed by it have been able to build up
immunity. In a world where many of the last resort antibiotics are failing against antibiotic-resistant superbugs, Manuka
honey may hold the key to fighting resistance issues, saving thousands of lives worldwide.

Manuka Honey Fights Superbugs

Dr. Dee Carter from the University of Sydneys School of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences noted that antibiotics not only
have short shelf lives, but the bacteria they attack quickly become resistant as well, making them useless over time.

The report, published in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, claimed that Manuka honey
killed almost every bacteria and pathogen it was tested on. Unlike all antibiotics available on todays market, none of the
bugs tested were able to survive the honey treatment.
Related: Garlic's healing properties are so intense that it is 100 times more effective than antibiotic treatments

According to Dr. Carter, there are particular compounds, like methylglyoxal, in the Manuka honey that cause multi-system
failure in the bacteria, killing them before they are able to adapt and build up immunity.

What Manuka Honey Can Do For You

Manukas biological properties range from antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antiviral, antibiotic and wound
healing, to immune-stimulatory. However, what separates Manuka honey from the rest is that its antibacterial powers
challenge even the toughest superbugs, such as the life-threatening methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Manuka honey is marketed for cancer treatment and prevention, high cholesterol, chronic inflammation, diabetes, the
treatment of gastrointestinal problems, and eye, ear and sinus infections. However, it might be most useful in treating skin
wounds and leg ulcers.

According to one study, published in the scientific journal Peer J, chronic wounds are becoming a major global health
problem, due to antibiotic resistance issues. They are costly and difficult to treat, and bacterial biofilms are important
contributors to the delay in healing. There is an urgent need for new, effective agents in topical wound care, and honey has
shown some great potential in this regard.
Related: Pineapple juice is 500% more effective than cough syrup

For their study, researchers reviewed Manuka honey in particular as an alternative treatment for wounds because of
its broad-spectrum antibacterial activity and the inability of bacteria to develop resistance to it. Their study indicated that
honey might prevent bacterial biofilms and eliminate established biofilms.

Furthermore, they reported that Manuka honey could successfully be used to kill all MSSA and MRSA biofilms in a chronic
wound, supporting the use of this type of honey as an effective topical treatment for chronic wound infections.

In recent years, word of the biological benefits of Manuka honey has spread to every corner of the world, turning it into one
of the most popular superfoods out there. Its fame and the over-demand, however, have caused shortages, resulting in fake,
usually cheaper, products to enter the market. So, if you are going to spend your money on honey to reap its benefits, make
sure you are buying the real thing.

Related: This Magic drink cures over 50 diseases

Why Are Public Officials Protecting GMO And The Pesticides Industry? Digging Down
Into The Cesspool Of Corruption
December 29 2016 | From: GlobalResearch

It is based on a cesspool of corruption that is most probably responsible for more death and
disease than the combined efforts of the tobacco companies ever were. It is sheer criminality that
hides behind corporate public relations, media misrepresentations and the subversion of
respectable-sounding agencies which masquerade as public institutions.
The agrochemicals-agritech industry should not be regarded as some kind of faceless concept because that lets
individuals off the hook. It is run by identifiable individuals who sell health-and environment-damaging products,co-
opt scientists, control public institutions and ensure farmers are kept on a chemical treadmill.

Related: Bayer and Syngenta knew: Ag giants discovered in secret tests that pesticides severely harmed bees

From CEOs and scientists to public officials and media/PR spin doctors, specific individuals can be identified and at some
stage should be hauled into court for what amounts to crimes against humanity.

In her numerous documents, Dr Rosemary Mason has described the devastating effects of agrochemicals and has singled out
certain individuals who, in a different world, would probably be standing in the dock to answer for their roles they have played
in poisoning the environment and damaging public health.

Mason has supplied ample, strong evidence to highlight how agrochemicals are killing us and how public institutions and
governments collude with the industry to frame legislation and polices to ensure its business as usual.
However, individuals act within circumstances not of their choosing; capitalism corrupts and it is not the concern of the
managers of private corporations to look after the interests of the public at large. A CEOs obligation is to maximise profit,
capture markets and defeat the competition.

The naive hope by many is that corporate social responsibility and consumers perception of a company will oblige
corporations to act in a manner that in some way serves the wider public interest. The other hope is that public officials and
institutions will safeguard this interest by holding private interests to account.

But in the cold, cynical world of free market capitalism, an interlocking directorate of state-corporate interests have for a long
time ensured that state institutions in liberal democracies are shaped and manipulated to facilitate the interests of private
capital.
The free market only exists in the warped delusions of those who churn out clichs about its sanctity. We need look no
further than the billions of taxpayer dollars that prop up US agriculture and agribusiness profits, for example, or, more
generally, how the state facilitates taxpayer-funded corporate welfare across the board.

The bottom line is to maximise profit for private corporations and, in Monsantos case, by all means possible, including the
unflinching defence of the health- and environment-damaging (but massively profitable) product glyphosate. Through political
influence and co-option, policies are put in place on Monsantos behalf, and the public is expected to sit back and take the
poison.

Its for their own good! And the relentless message is that there is no alternative, when, in reality, there are genuine
alternatives to a pesticide-drenched food and agriculture that is both commercially and politically motivated.
Related: Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and the Mentality of Propaganda Control

Within the cesspool created, corporations bank on their political influence, media hacks, bogus science, lobbyists and public
relations departments and firms to churn out the message that they are serving the public interest, while clearly acting against
it.

And this leads us back to Dr Rosemary Mason and her new open letter to the European Chemicals Agency. As with her many
other open letters to officialdom, Mason takes us on a journey by naming names and shedding light on how corporate power
works to encourage scientific fraud and subvert public watchdogs and policy-making institutions with the aim of getting toxic
agrochemicals, especially glyphosate, onto the market and ensuring they remain there.

She addresses the letter directly to European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Executive Director Geert Dancet.

Key Points From Masons Open Letter

Readers are urged to consult Masons 5,000-word open letter (open-letter-to-the-european-chemical-agency-about-scientific-

fraud-and-ecocide), where they can find all the relevant links, charts and references to support the points below.

1. Scientific fraud and glyphosate. The German government has accused the German Rapporteur Member State Federal
Institute of Risk Assessment (BfR) and the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) of scientific fraud for using Glyphosate
Task Force (GTF) statistics that for some considerable time claimed them to be BfRs own work.

Mason demands that the ECHA must act to ban glyphosate immediately and asserts that human health and the environment
are being totally destroyed by it as well as the hundreds of other chemicals that have been registered illegally.

Mason writes:

The current EU legislation was originally set up to protect the pesticides industry. Monsanto and other
agrochemical corporations helped the EU to design the regulatory systems for their own products and chose which
country should be appointed as Rapporteur Member State.
 Regulation 1107/2009, Article 63 specified that: All confidential data shall be deleted or redacted. Much of the
industry data submitted to the German RMS was redacted.

2. Glyphosate, conflicts of interest and PR masquerading as science. By naming names (Alan Boobis, Angelo Moretti,
Chris Wolf, Michael Pragnell and others), Mason notes how key positions are held by individuals with proven links to the
agrochemicals industry. As a result, crucial decisions and documents are slanted accordingly.

Related: Verdict: Monsanto Guilty Of Crimes Against The Planet And Humanity

Mason mentions Critical Reviews in Toxicology and how, in 2016 Volume 46, Monsanto commissioned five reviews published
in a supplement to Critical Reviews in Toxicology. Monsanto also funded them. The whole point was to raise serious doubts
about the adverse effects of glyphosate by using junk science and to confuse the whole issue. Mason says that this is what
Monsanto paid the scientists for.

3. The ECHA might be preparing itself to support EFSA, the European Commissioners and the Glyphosate Task
Force (GTF) to re-license glyphosate in 2017. This is despite the fact that, of the 293 responses to ECHAs consultation, an
overwhelming majority supported the International Agency for Research into Cancer (IARC) position that glyphosate is
probably carcinogenic for humans.

4. The German government summoned Prof Dr Andreas Hensel before the Committee on Agriculture and Food
where he accused BfR of scientific fraud. BfR stands accused of endangering the population and of intentional falsification
of the content of scientific studies. In addition, Prof Dr Eberhard Greiser, a retired epidemiologist at the University of Bremen,
says of BfRs actions, Id say this is an intentional falsification of the content of scientific studies.

5. Evidence given to the International Monsanto Tribunal. Toxicologist Dr Peter Clausing:

 Ample evidence has been provided above showing that European Authorities twisted or ignored scientific facts
and distorted the truth to enable the conclusion that glyphosate is not to be considered a carcinogen, thereby
accepting and reinforcing the false conclusion proposed by the Monsanto-led GTF.

The German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
committed scientific fraud.

In his evidence to the tribunal, Clausing systematically demolished arguments that the EU authorities used to dismiss the
significant findings of glyphosate-induced malignant lymphoma in mouse carcinogenicity studies.

Mason then goes on to discuss the wide-ranging evidence presented to the tribunal, including Lawyer Koffi Dogbevis
discussion of Monsanto and ecocide (destruction of the environment), which is a crime against humanity that is likely to be
subject to prosecution in the International Criminal Court.

She notes the vicious media campaign mounted against Professor Seralini and his team that was instigated by interested
circles from the chemical industry as well as the industry-financed British Science Media Centre.

6. Industry pressure on the EPA. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), having concluded that glyphosate is
not a carcinogen, invited public comments.

Public comments were invited on 16/09/2016 to the Scientific Advisory Panel of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and
Rodenticide Act) on US EPA Glyphosate Issue Paper: Evaluation of Carcinogenic Potential. However, only four days before
the meeting it was suddenly delayed.
Related: Transgenic Wars - How GMOs Impact Livestock and Human Health Around the Globe

Why did US EPA delay the FIFRA SAP meeting at such short notice? Mason provides compelling evidence indicating the
industrys hand in trying to remove certain scientists from being included on the panel. The suggestion is that the EPA bowed
to intense industry lobbying from CropLife America (a US trade association representing the major manufacturers, formulators
and distributors of crop protection and pest control products).

7. EPA collusion with Monsanto. In 1991, an archival document showed that the US EPA Health Effects Division colluded
with Monsanto: glyphosate was to be changed from a Group C carcinogen to Group E (evidence of non-carcinogenicity for
humans).

Members of US EPAs Toxicology Branch of the Hazard Evaluation Division Committee, in a consensus review on March 4
1985, had classified glyphosate as a Group C carcinogen, based on the incidence in rats/mice of renal tumours, thyroid C-cell
adenomas and carcinomas, pancreatic islet cell adenomas, hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas in males, but on June
26 1991 the Health Effects Division Carcinogenicity Peer Review Committee met to discuss and evaluate the weight of
evidence on glyphosate with particular emphasis on its carcinogenic potential.
In a review of the data the committee concluded that glyphosate should be classified as Group E (evidence of non-
carcinogenicity for humans). However, three of the Committee refused to sign and wrote: DO NOT CONCUR.

8. Monsantos sealed secret studies from the US EPA obtained under Freedom of Information. US Scientist Anthony
Samsel analysed Monsantos sealed secret long-term studies (15,000-20,000 pages) from the US EPA (on mice, rats, rabbit
and beagles) and showed that Monsanto knew that glyphosate was carcinogenic from the 1970s.

9. Glyphosate causes cataracts and interstitial damage and a range of diseases. Among Monsantos long term studies,
an unpublished study on albino rats in 1990 showed that glyphosate entered the eye and caused cataracts and tissue
damage.

The rate of cataract surgery in England increased very substantially between 1989 and 2004 from 173 (1989) to 637 (2004)
episodes per 100,000 population.

A 2016 study by the WHO also confirmed that the incidence of cataracts had greatly increased: A global assessment of the
burden of disease from environmental risks. says that cataracts are the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Globally,
cataracts are responsible for 51% of blindness an estimated 20 million individuals suffer from this degenerative eye disease.
In the US, between 2000 and 2010 the number of cases of cataract rose by 20% from 20.5 million to 24.4 million.
It is projected that by 2050, the number of people with cataracts will have doubled to 50 million.

Mason then goes on to describe in some detail how the municipalitys spraying of glyphosate effectively destroyed her nature
reserve near Swansea, Wales, and is responsible for cancers, neurological diseases and cataracts, just as Monsanto found
in long-term studies before it gained illegal registration with the US EPA.

10. The UK State of Nature Report 2016. One of the reports authors, Mark Eaton, says:

The report includes a new biodiversity intactness index, which analyses the loss of species over centuries. The
UK has lost significantly more nature over the long term than the global average with the UK the 29th lowest out of
218 countries.

It is quite shocking where we stand compared to the rest of the world, even compared to other western European
countries: France and Germany are quite a way above us in the rankings. The index gives an idea of where we
have got to over the centuries, and we are pretty knackered.

Mason provides a great deal of statistical evidence to highlight the massive increase (by crop type) in use of pesticides over
the years, not least glyphosate.
And she also provides a great deal of shocking data that highlights the increase in major diseases and the loss of biodiversity,
as set out in the State of Nature Report.

In finishing her open letter, Mason asks the various agencies responsible for protecting health and the environment:

Why are you all protecting the pesticides industry?

Then she adds:

Monsanto has been lying to you for the sake of money. They wanted to control the food CEO Hugh Grant and
the US EPA knew that glyphosate caused all of these problems. The corporation concealed the carcinogenic
effects of PCBs on humans and animals for seven years.

They have no plans to protect you and your families from the tsunami of sickness that is affecting us all in the UK
and the US.

Related: Maryland To Become First State In U.S. To Ban Bee-Killing Pesticides

The Beginning Of The End Of The War On Medicine
December 28 2016 | From: GreenMedInfo

The writing is on the wall, and conventional medicine should stop resisting change and start to
embrace it.

For nearly 100 years, there has been a serious war going on between the proponents of allopathic (conventional)
medicine and those who support natural or functional medicine.

Related: Arrested For Selling What?!

Functional medicine in the form of herbal, Ayurvedic, and Chinese medicine was dominant around the world for hundreds of
years. Then, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the germ theory of disease began to take over, along with technological
advances such as x-rays, the electron microscope, and the use of antibiotics.
Related: The Flawed Germ Theory; Unfortunately The Basis Of Modern Medicine

A new breed of medical school emerged to teach future doctors how to utilize these new diagnostic tools, medicines, and
operating procedures to defeat the external invaders of the body. Doctors became thoroughly convinced that most diseases
were caused by germs, bacteria, viruses, or rogue cells that needed to be cut out, killed, or controlled by these new medical
breakthroughs.

Natural medicine was dismissed as being outdated and unscientific. Medical schools stopped teaching this form of
medicine and medical licenses were given only to those who graduated from the new medical schools that had been
established across the world.

Naturopathic doctors were branded as quacks, as were chiropractors, nutritionists, acupuncturists, and all of the
other so-called natural medical practitioners.

But in the late 1940s and early 1950s, proponents of natural medicine started to push back. Under the unofficial leadership of
Linus Pauling, a small group of scientists and doctors began treating brain-related illnesses, such
as depression and schizophrenia, with diet and nutritional supplements.
Related: Nutritional Links To Cure Depression And Mental Illness

They were pleased with the results of this new approach and Pauling eventually coined the treatment protocols as
orthomolecular psychiatry.

While Pauling and other pioneers, like Abram Hoffer, were making strides on brain-related disorders, the rest of the human
body was also getting some attention. The hippy movement of the 1960s created a mini-groundswell of interest in
nonconventional treatments.

Nutrition and herbal remedies became the rage for these counterculture types. Others soon became believers as conventional
medicine proved to be less successful than many had hoped for. Visits to naturopaths, chiropractors, and acupuncturists
began to increase while reports of dangerous side effects from prescription medications continued to surface.
Related: Australia, New Zealand, Canada, England, USA: Medical Dictatorship

Early leaders in this holistic movement, such as Andrew Weil, Bernie Siegel, and Dean Ornish, emerged in the 1980s after
publishing groundbreaking books. Another early leader was Joseph Pizzorno, who co-founded Bastyr University in 1978 to
educate naturopathic doctors. It is now recognized as one of the premier schools in the world for natural medicine.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s there was also a movement to show that the brain and the body actually worked together for
the benefit of the whole person.

This flew directly in the face of over 400 years of traditional medical thinking, which started when French philosopher Rene
Descartes declared that the human brain was totally separate and not relevant to the health of the human body. Many doctors
have since disproved this theory and clearly established the connection between mind and body.

Another Step Forward

The nonconventional medical model has been called many things over the past 50 years, including:

Natural

Holistic

Alternative

Complementary

Integrative

Functional

Integrative and complementary became the key names in the early 1990s as efforts were beginning to bring the two
medicines together in order to better meet the needs of a confused and frustrated public.
This effort at integration took a major step forward during the 1992 presidential campaign. Apparently, Ross Perot, a third-
party candidate for president of the United States, asked Hans Nieper, a German physician, for some ideas on how to reform
the American Health Care System.

Dr. Nieper had gained considerable notoriety for his treatment of cancer and MS with totally natural substances.

Jon Eisen Submission To Health Select Committee

His reform proposal eventually made it into the hands of Bill Clinton who, after being elected, asked his close colleague Bill
Richardson to put together legislation that would help to accelerate research into, and utilization of, these natural medicine
protocols.

With the help of Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, the legislation passed under the title The Dietary Supplement Health and
Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA). This bill not only protected the right of people to use dietary supplements, it eventually led
to funding for research on the efficacy of various nutritional supplements and natural treatments.

In the past 20 years, since those significant changes in policies were made at the national level, there have been many other
changes in the medical paradigm. Evidence has been mounting that the conventional medical model was simply not working.

Related: Australian School Kids Recreate Price-Gouging Pharma CEOs $750-a-Pill AIDS Drug for $2

Dangerous Signs Of Failure

While natural and holistic medicine are getting a big positive push forward, equally negative developments are
occurring regarding conventional medicine:

The percentage of our GDP allocated to healthcare expenditures is gradually increasing; it was 5.2% in 196021 and
is estimated to reach nearly 20% by 2021
 The US spends nearly twice as much as other industrialized countries on healthcare (per capita) and yet ranks near
the bottom in practically every measure of population health.

About 95% of every healthcare dollar is spent on treatment and less than 5% on prevention, despite the fact that
over 70% of many deadly diseases, such as type II diabetes, coronary artery disease, stroke, and colon cancer are
preventable by lifestyle choices.

An article in the New England Journal of Medicine reported that over $100 billion was spent on balloon angioplasty
and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 2007, yet only 3% of bypass patients experienced prolonged life span.

Prescription drugs cause 700,000 emergency room visits each year and over 41,000 deaths.

Recent evidence estimates that there are over 400,000 avoidable hospital deaths each year.

In the book Death By Medicine by Gary Null, et al., the total number of avoidable deaths by conventional
medicine was placed at over 783,936 per year.

Dr. David Eddy did a study on the scientific evidence behind conventional medical treatments. An article
in Business Week Magazine in 2006 quoted Dr. Eddys study and declared that only 20 to 25% of what was being
done to treat patients has been proven effective.

The Journal of Clinical Evidence reports that only 11% of typical conventional medical treatments may be
categorized as beneficial, by randomized controlled trials.

There are a few positive things to report on the conventional medicine front. In terms of acute care, there have been
tremendous strides made in the technology related to operations. Surgery has become less invasive with higher rates of
success for many operations.

However, there is still a problem related to the number of unnecessary operations being performed and prime examples
include knee surgery, back surgery, angioplasty, and heart surgery. If unnecessary operations were eliminated, acute care
could become the shining star for conventional medicine.

While conventional medicine was acquiring a very dismal track record on the treatment of chronic disease, the exact
opposite pattern was emerging for holistic/functional medicine.

Some examples include the following:

A large study published in the British medical journal Lancet Oncology found that diet (plant-based),
yoga, meditation, and lifestyle changes increased the length of telomeres. Shorter telomere length has been
associated with conditions such as hypertension, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and prostate cancer.

The Institute of Medicine reported in the Wall Street Journal that a holistic approach to health care - which uses the
best of conventional medicine along with alternative therapies like meditation, yoga, acupuncture, and herbal
medicines - has been scientifically documented to be medically effective and cost effective.

The book Nutritional Medicine has over 15,000 scientific references proving that healthy foods and nutritional
supplements can prevent, and often reverse, nearly every chronic disease.

This pattern of strong evidence for holistic/functional medicine protocols has been reported in hundreds of articles in peer-
reviewed journals and yet the money-driven medical establishment has been able to hold off this trend with some clever
political spin tactics.

They have consistently attacked natural medicine using orthodox medical associations while big pharma uses its enormous
wealth to control Congress, large swaths of academia, and the media. Conventional medicine was thus able make it appear
that natural medicine was unscientific.

Related: Popular Kitchen Remedy Puts Antibiotic To Shame, Research Reveals

These tactics have weakened in the Internet era as more people are able to access information that is not controlled by the
mainstream media and their big pharma advertisers.

The Beginning Of The End

Conventional medicines house of cards is about to begin its big fall from grace with the recent announcement that the
prestigious Cleveland Clinic is going functional.

President and CEO of the Cleveland Clinic Dr. Delos Toby Cosgrove recently announced a number of significant
actions including:

The establishment of the first functional medicine grand rounds titled Functional Perspective on Food and
Nutrition: The Ultimate Upstream Medicine,

Research to test functional medicine models head-to-head against conventional medicine for a number of chronic
diseases, such as diabetes, asthma, and autoimmune diseases,

The creation of a Wellness Institute and the appointment of the nations first Chief Wellness Officer,

Creation of a Chinese Herbal Therapy Clinic, one of the first of its kind in the country,

The movement of the clinics $6.2 billion network of hospitals, family health centers, and outpatient clinics in a
decidedly holistic direction.

This is the most significant push in the holistic direction by any mainstream health care network in the United States and much
of the credit must go to Dr. Mark Hyman, who met with Dr. Cosgrove several times over the past two years. Dr. Hyman is the
Chairman of the Board of The Institute of Functional Medicine and one of the true leaders in the functional medicine
movement.
Related: Your Body is Designed to Heal Itself. Why Not Help it - Rather Than Hinder it?

For two years, Dr. Cosgrove tried to bring Dr. Hyman to Cleveland. Dr. Hyman resisted the CEOs overtures and actually told
him;

Toby, you dont want me there. Because if I go there Im going to tell you that most of what you are doing is
wrong; that in fact, you are harming people, that I would want to implement programs that are going to empty out
half your hospitals and clear out most of your procedure rooms, and reduce hospital stays and doctor visits
dramatically.

Are you okay with that?

Dr. Cosgrove did not waiver in his commitment to the new direction and has moved ahead with Dr. Hymans full support and
assistance.
Related: Introduction / Overview: The Healing Computer Technology

This dire pronouncement about conventional medicine is a very similar to a statement Dr. Hyman made at a US Senate
hearing on health care a few years ago when he said:

You will not solve the current healthcare crisis if you simply continue to do the wrong things better.

The writing is on the wall, and conventional medicine should stop resisting change and start to embrace it.

This is a battle that those who believe only in conventional medicine cannot win, and the more they resist, the more credibility
and respect they will lose. This is truly the beginning of the end of the war in medicine.

Related Articles:

Minute by minute diagram reveals the health concerns Red Bull causes your body

The Medical Mystery Behind America's Best-Selling Hair-loss Drug

CBS Reveals that Swine Flu Cases Seriously Overestimated

The CDC medical police state: the right to detain anyone

Things the FDA doesn't want you to know

Hospitals Can Kill YouAnd a New Study Shows Us Why

Over 120 Canadians euthanized since law passed in mid-June media

Top Doctors Reveal Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against Us + Study Pulled
From Publication After Proving Truth Of Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Children
December 24 2016 | From: NaturalBlaze/ NaturalNews

The research is hard to ignore, vaccines can trigger autoimmunity with a laundry list of diseases to
follow. With harmful and toxic metals as some vaccine ingredients, who is susceptible and which
individuals are more at risk?

No one would accuse Yehuda Shoenfeld of being a quack. The Israeli clinician has spent more than three decades
studying the human immune system and is at the pinnacle of his profession.

Related: Nursing student expelled for questioning directives to use threats, lies to coerce patients to vaccinate

You might say he is more foundation than fringe in his specialty; he wrote the textbooks. The Mosaic of
Autoimmunity, Autoantibodies, Diagnostic Criteria in Autoimmune Diseases, Infection and Autoimmunity, Cancer and
Autoimmunity the list is 25 titles long and some of them are cornerstones of clinical practice.

Hardly surprising that Shoenfeld has been called the Godfather of Autoimmunology the study of the immune system turned
on itself in a wide array of diseases from type 1 diabetes to ulcerative colitis and multiple sclerosis.

But something strange is happening in the world of immunology lately and a small evidence of it is that the Godfather of
Autoimmunology is pointing to vaccines - specifically, some of their ingredients including the toxic metal aluminum as a
significant contributor to the growing global epidemic of autoimmune diseases.
Related: Trump: Vaccines Cause Autism And Will Be Investigated

The bigger evidence is a huge body of research thats poured in in the past 15 years, and particularly in the past five years.
Take for example, a recent article published in the journal Pharmacological Research in which Shoenfeld and colleagues
issue unprecedented guidelines naming four categories of people who are most at risk for vaccine-induced autoimmunity.

On one hand, vaccines prevent infections which can trigger autoimmunity, say the papers authors, Alessandra Soriano, of
the Department of Clinical Medicine and Rheumatology at the Campus Bio-Medico University in Rome, Gideon Nesher, of the
Hebrew University Medical School in Jerusalem and Shoenfeld, founder and head of the Zabludowicz Center of Autoimmune
Diseases in the Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer.

He is also editor of three medical journals and author of more than 1,500 research papers across the spectrum of medical
journalism and founder of the International Congress on Autoimmunology.

On the other hand, many reports that describe post-vaccination autoimmunity strongly suggest that vaccines can
indeed trigger autoimmunity.

Defined autoimmune diseases that may occur following vaccinations include arthritis, lupus (systemic lupus
erythematosus, SLE) diabetes mellitus, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, dermatomyosiositis, Guillain-Barre syndrome
and demyelinating disorders. Almost all types of vaccines have been reported to be associated with the onset of
ASIA.
Related: Herd immunity is a myth: Why un-vaccinated children are not a threat to others

ASIA or Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (also known as Shoenfelds syndrome) - first appeared
in the Journal of Autoimmunology four years ago.

It is an umbrella term for a collection of similar symptoms, including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, that result after
exposure to an adjuvant an environmental agent including common vaccine ingredients that stimulate the immune
system.

Since then an enormous body of research, using ASIA as a paradigm, has begun to unravel the mystery of how environmental
toxins, particularly the metal aluminum used in vaccines, can trigger an immune system chain reaction in susceptible
individuals and may lead to overt autoimmune disease.

Autoimmune disease results when the bodys system meant to attack foreign invaders turns instead to attack part of the body
it belongs to (auto is Greek for self). If the immune system is like a national defence system, antibodies are like drones
programmed to recognize a certain type of invader (a bacteria say) and to destroy them or mark them for destruction by other
special forces.
Autoantibodies are like drones that are misidentifying a component of the human body and have launched a sustained attack
on it. If they mistakenly target a component of the conductive sheath around neurons, for example, nerve impulses stop
conducting properly, muscles go into spasm and coordination fails; multiple sclerosis results.

If autoantibodies erroneously focus on joint tissue; rheumatoid arthritis results. If they target the islets of Langerhans in the
pancreas, Type 1 diabetes, and so on

Throughout our lifetime the normal immune system walks a fine line between preserving normal immune reactions
and developing autoimmune diseases, says the paper.

The healthy immune system is tolerant to self-antigens. When self-tolerance is disturbed, dysregulation of the
immune system follows, resulting in emergence of an autoimmune disease. Vaccination is one of the conditions
that may disturb this homeostasis in susceptible individuals, resulting in autoimmune phenomena and ASIA.

Who is susceptible is the subject of the paper entitled, Predicting post-vaccination autoimmunity: Who might be
at risk? It lists four categories of people:

1. Those who have had a previous autoimmune reaction to a vaccine

2. Anyone with a medical history of autoimmunity

3. Patients with a history of allergic reactions

4. Anyone at high risk of developing autoimmune disease including anyone with a family history of autoimmunity,
presence of autoantibodies which are detectable by blood tests and other factors including low vitamin D and
smoking.

Previous Reaction
Regarding those who have had a previous adverse reaction to vaccines, the paper cites five relevant studies including the
case of a death of a teenage girl six months following her third Gardasil injection against HPV virus.

Related: Gardasil Fully Exposed: HPV Vaccine Being Tested on Infants Has Killed, Permanently Injured Thousands

She had experienced a range of symptoms shortly after her first dose, including dizziness, numbness and tingling in her
hands, and memory lapses. After her second injection, she developed intermittent arm weakness, frequent tiredness
requiring daytime naps, worse tingling, night sweats, chest pain and palpitations.

A full autopsy was unrevealing but blood and spleen tissue analysis revealed HPV-16 L1 gene DNA fragments - matching the
DNA found in vials of the Gardasil vaccine against cervical cancer - thus implicating the vaccine as a causal factor.

The DNA fragments had also been found to be complexed with the aluminum adjuvant which, according to the report, have
been shown to persist for up to 8 to 10 years causing chronic immune system stimulation.

Although data is limited, Shoenfeld and his colleagues concluded, it seems preferable that individuals with prior
autoimmune or autoimmune-like reactions to vaccinations, should not be immunized, at least not with the same
type of vaccine.

Established Autoimmune Condition

The second group which the paper cites for vaccine exemption is patients with established autoimmune conditions. Vaccines
dont work so well in them, say Shoenfeld and his colleagues, and they are at risk for flares following vaccination.

Inoculations that contain live viruses including chickenpox, yellow fever and the measles, mumps and rubella triple vaccine
(MMR) are generally contraindicated for people with autoimmune conditions because of the risk of uncontrolled viral
replication. But inactivated vaccines are not such a good idea either because they usually contain the added ingredient
aluminum, linked to autoimmunity.

The immunologists describe recent studies in which patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease given the influenza vaccine
(without aluminum) suffered more joint pain and fever than controls and whose levels of autoantibodies (the drones that attack
self) increased after receiving the flu vaccine.
Related: How The CDC And Vaccine Court Create An Epidemic Of Autism

Whats more, they developed new types of autoantibodies that werent present before the vaccines, and those persisted. As
the presence of autoantibodies can be predictive of developing autoimmune disease in patients without symptoms, even
years ahead of disease onset, this is troubling to those who understand immunology.

A number of studies claim vaccines are safe for the overwhelming majority of patients with established autoimmune
diseases, the study allows, but they only looked at rheumatoid arthritis and lupus and not at severe and active cases so the
potential benefit of vaccination should be weighed against its potential risk, they cautioned.

Patients With a History of Allergy

Vaccine trials have usually excluded vulnerable individuals - only extremely healthy individuals with no allergies are
recruited. Its a selection bias, say Soriano and Shoenfeld, and has likely resulted in serious adverse events being
considerably underestimated in real life where vaccines are mandated to all individuals regardless of their susceptibility.

The true incidence of allergic reactions to vaccines, normally estimated at between one in 50,000 to one in a million doses, is
probably much higher and particularly where gelatin or egg proteins are on the ingredients list, they say.

Theres a long list of vaccine ingredients that are potential allergens: besides the infectious agents themselves, there are
those from hens egg, horse serum, bakers yeast, numerous antibiotics, formaldehyde and lactose, as well inadvertent
ingredients such as latex.
Related: New Study Confirms That Mercury Is Linked to Autism

Peoples allergic histories have to be taken before vaccination say the researchers. But some signs of reaction dont
show up until after the shot.

The public health nurse or GP might tell patients that a long-lasting swelling around the injection site after a vaccine is a
normal reaction, for example. But that is not what the immunologists say. [A]luminum sensitization manifests as nodules [hard
lumps] at the injection site that often regress after weeks or months, but may persist for years. In such cases, they say, a
patch test can be done to confirm sensitivity and to avoid vaccination.

According to a growing body of research, though, allergy may be only the beginning of many dangerous aluminum-induced
phenomena.

The Trouble With Aluminium

Aluminum has been added to vaccines since about 1926 when Alexander Glenny and colleagues noticed it would produce
better antibody responses in vaccines than the antigen alone. Glenny figured the alum was inducing what he called a depot
effect slowing the release of the antigen and heightening the immune response.

For 60 years his theory was accepted dogma. And over the same time, the vaccine schedule grew decade on decade, but few
ever questioned the effects of injecting aluminum into the body, which is strange considering its known toxicity.

A PubMed search on aluminum and toxicity turns up 4,258 entries. Its neurotoxicity is well documented. It affects memory,
cognition, psychomotor control; it damages the blood brain barrier, activates brain inflammation, depresses mitochondrial
function and plenty of research suggests it is a key player in the formation of the amyloid plaques and tangles in the brains of
Alzheimers patients.
Related: The WHO's condescending tips for EU healthcare workers to convince informed patients that vaccines are
safe

Its been implicated in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and autism and demonstrated to induce allergy.

When kidney dialysis patients were accidentally infused with aluminum, the dialysis-induced encephalopathy (DAE) they
developed neurological symptoms: speech abnormalities, tremors, memory loss, impaired concentration and behavioural
changes. Many of the patients eventually went into comas and died. The lucky ones survived: when the source of toxicity,
aluminum, was removed from their dialysis they recovered rapidly.

With these new observations, researchers began investigating the adjuvant effects of aluminum and in the past decade there
has been a flurry of research. Far from being a sandbag that holds the antigen for a while and then gets excreted, it turns out
that aluminum salts trigger a storm of defence action.

Vaccines: A Violation of Human Rights

The video below is a rational discussion about vaccines with Christina Hildebrand, President of A Voice For Choice,
Inc. where she explains why mandatory vaccines are a violation of your human rights and how they are potentially
dangerous to you or your child's health.

Christina is passionate about ensuring people know what they are putting into their bodies - be it food, air, water or
medications. For the past 12 years, Christina has spent many thousands of hours researching and sharing her knowledge
within her local community.

However, with the growth of the Big Ag and Big pHARMa's influences on US politics, Christina realized that she needed to
take this to a different level and educate the masses on their right to informed choice and transparency of what goes into their
bodies.
Within hours of injection of the same aluminum oxyhydroxide in vaccines into mice, for example, armies of specialized
immune cells are on the move, calling in grid coordinates for more specialist assault forces. Within a day, a whole host of
immune system commandos are in play - neutrophils, eosinophils, inflammatory monocytes, myeloid and dendritic cells,
activating lymphocytes and secreting proteins called cytokines.

The cytokines themselves cause collateral damage but they send out signals, directing cell-to-cell communication and
recruiting other cells into action. If the next phase of the attack is launched: fibroblast growth factor, interferons, interleukins,
platelet derived growth factor, transforming growth factor and tumour necrosis factor might all be engaged.

Theres evidence that poorly understood and pesky inflammasomes, (currently a topic of cutting- edge cancer causation
research) such as the Nod-like receptor 3( NLRP) are activated too, but its all still too early to say exactly what theyre doing.

Related: The most evil people in medicine today

New research emerging from University of British Columbia has found that aluminum adjuvant injected into mice can alter the
expression of genes associated with autoimmunity.

And in their recent study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, immunologists at the University
of Colorado found that even host DNA is recruited into the aluminum assault, that it rapidly coats injected alum, triggering
effects that scientists have barely scratched the surface of understanding.

The Significance of Macrophagic Myofasciitis

This mobility or translocation of aluminum in the body is perhaps the most disturbing of the mounting evidence in current
aluminum research. In 1998, French researcher Romain Gherardi and his colleagues observed an emerging condition of
unknown origin which presented in patients post-vaccination with Chronic Fatigue like symptoms including swollen lymph
nodes, joint and muscle pain and exhaustion.

Tissue biopsies of the patients deltoid revealed lesions up to 1 cm in diameter and unique from similar lesions of other
diseases. They went to the lab for analysis and to Gherardis astonishment, they mainly consisted of macrophages large
white blood cells in the immune system whose job is to swallow up foreign invaders in the body. Enclosed in the cellular fluid
of these phagocytes were agglomerates of nanocrystals of aluminum.
Related: Cannabis Oil Cured Girls Leukemia After HPV Vaccine Broke Down Her Body: Hayley Willar

Gherardi and his colleagues began injecting mice with aluminum to see what happened. Their research published in 2013
revealed that the metal particles were engulfed by macrophages and formed MMF-like granulomas that dispersed to distant
lymph nodes, spleen, liver and eventually brain.

This strongly suggests that long-term adjuvant biopersistence within phagocytic cells is a prerequisite of slow
brain translocation and delayed neurotoxicity, writes Gherardi in his February 2015 review of the relevant
research in Frontiers in Neurology.

A more frightening animal study of aluminum is that of Spanish veterinary researcher Lluis Lujans study of ovine ASIA.

After huge numbers of sheep in Spain died in 2008 in the wake of a compulsory multiple vaccine campaign against
bluetongue in Spain in 2008, Lujan set out to find out what killed them and he began by inoculating them with aluminum.

His 2013 study found that only 0.5% of sheep inoculated with aluminum vaccines showed immediate reactions of lethargy,
transient blindness, stupor, prostration and seizures

Characterized by a severe meningoencephalitis, similar to postvaccine reactions seen in humans.

Most of them recovered, temporarily, but postmortem exams of the ones who didnt revealed acute brain inflammation.
The delayed onset chronic phase of the disease affected far more of the sheep - 50-70% of flocks and sometimes virtually
100% of animals within a given flock, usually including all of those who had previously recovered.

The reaction was frequently triggered by exposure to cold and began with restlessness and compulsive wool-biting, then
progressed to acute redness of the skin, generalized weakness, extreme weight loss and muscle tremors, and finally, entered
the terminal phase where the animals went down on their front quarters, became comatose and died.

Related: Cancer industry profits 'locked in' by nagalase molecule injected into humans via vaccines... spurs tumor
growth... explains aggressive vaccine push

Post-mortem examinations revealed severe neuron necrosis and aluminum in the nerve tissue.

The immune systems reaction to aluminum represents a major health challenge, Gerhardi declares in his recent review, and
he adds that;

Attempts to seriously examine safety concerns raised by the bio-persistent character and brain accumulation of
alum particles have not been made A lot must be done to understand how, in certain individuals, alum-
containing vaccines may become insidiously unsafe.

Back to the problem of which certain individuals should avoid vaccination to avoid autoimmune disease.

People Prone to Develop Autoimmunity

Soriano and Shoenfelds identify a final category: anyone at risk of developing autoimmune disease. Since a number of them
have been shown to have genetic factors that would include anyone with a family history of autoimmune disease.

It also includes anyone who has tested positive for autoantibodies which can indicate disease years before symptoms show
up. Vaccinations, the doctors say, may trigger or worsen the disease.

Smokers too, have an exceptionally high risk of developing an autoimmune disease, says the report. The American Cancer
Society estimates that about 18% of Americans smoke. That means about 42 million Americans have an elevated risk of
developing an autoimmune disease and theyre stacking the odds with every vaccine.
Related: Vaccinations: An analysis of the health risks

And finally, factors that Shoenfeld and Soriano associate with high risk of developing autoimmunity are high estrogen and low
vitamin D - which means anyone taking birth control or hormone replacement therapy and, according to one 2009 study of
vitamin D status, about three quarters of American teens and adults should be wary of vaccines.

Shoenfeld doesnt seem to mean to exclude all of these people from immunization, however. The paper concludes that for
the overwhelming majority of individuals, vaccines carry no risk of systemic autoimmune disease and should be administered
according to current recommendations.

Which is in stark contrast to the body of the paper. The final word is cautionary about weighing the potential benefit of
vaccinationagainst its potential risk.

Its exemplary of a strange sort of schizophrenia in a wide range of recent immunology papers. The doctors seem to be trying
to reconcile a century of safe and effective vaccine dogma with the last decades worth of terrifying research findings.
Theres a lot of on the one hand and on the other hand in them.
Related: Gary Null: Are we being lied to about 'vaccine efficacy'?

The new research seems about to gain the upper hand, however. A 2013 overview of ASIA by six immunologists including
Shoenfeld, for example, is a catalogue of vaccine side effects from Gardasil deaths, narcolepsy epidemics, infertility, chronic
fatigue, dead sheep and aluminum-addled brains. It is rife with statements that would have been virtually unheard of inside
mainstream medicine a decade ago. Like this shocker:

Perhaps, in twenty years, physicians will be dueling with better characterized particles of autoimmunity, and the
vaccines may become fully safe as well as effective.

Nonetheless the recognition of ASIA has initiated the change to put more efforts in identifying the good, the bad
and the ugly of vaccines and in particular of adjuvants as triggers of autoimmunity.

Bad and ugly of vaccines? Whats wrong with the adjuvants? Thats not in the CDC hand-out.

Or How About This One:

Despite the huge amount of money invested in studying vaccines, there are few observational studies
and virtually no randomized clinical trials documenting the effect on mortality of any of the existing
vaccines.

One recent paper found an increased hospitalization rate with the increase of the number of vaccine doses
and a mortality rate ratio for 5-8 vaccine doses to 1-4 doses of 1.5, indicating a statistically significant
increase of deaths associated with higher vaccine doses.
 Since vaccines are given to millions of infants annually, it is imperative that health authorities have
scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines

That could be any anti-vaxxer jabbering onbut its not.

But Here is the Topper:

The US Supreme Court ruled that vaccines makers are immune from lawsuits charging that the design of the
vaccine is defective. Thus there is need for innovative clinical trial design and the vaccines themselves should be
redesigned.

Immunologists including the worlds leading authority on autoimmunity are saying it is time to take vaccines back to
the drawing board.

Autoimmune disease is the third leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and now among the top 10 killers of
young American women.

The American Autoimmune Related Diseases Association estimates that 50 million Americans suffer from one of 88
autoimmune diseases - from type 1 diabetes to systemic lupus erythematosus - and some research puts the figure at one in
five globally.

At least 40 more diseases are suspected to be immune-mediated. Most of them are devastating - frequently crippling,
expensive to treat and incurable. And they are increasing at an astonishing pace.

Related: Mercury and autism: New research provides yet more damning evidence that mercury exposure leads to
ASD
At this stage, it looks like the more the research pours in, the harder it is going to get for pro-vaccine immunologists to keep
multiple personality disorder or complete nervous breakdown - at bay. Ten years of cutting edge research into aluminums
effects on the immune system has revealed primarily how wrong they were.

And how little they know. If, after 90 years, doctors finally have begun to seriously examine the mechanism and question the
merits of injecting metal toxins into newborn babies, what have they yet to discover? ASIA sounds awful. (Too bad for all the
people whose kids suffered through chronic fatigue when it was just a Freudian yearning to sleep with their mother.)

But what if, like Lujans sheep, the negligible minority that has been paying the price for the good of humanity is actually only
the tip of the iceberg? What if some people with no apparent adverse immune reactions still have nanocrystals of aluminum
silently depositing in their brains? What if ASIA really includes Alzheimers? ALS, autism? ADD? And thats just the As.

Related: New Transmissible Vaccine Spreads Like Virus, No Consent Necessary

Even if immunologists keep wearing their rose coloured glasses, and vaccine ingredients are only responsible for a tiny
fraction of the exploding autoimmunity, the ugly in vaccines will still get harder and harder to ignore.

When everyone on the planet is getting injected, 20 years is a long time for disabled people to stack up while scientists duel
with the characterized particles of autoimmunity.

In the fury over the Disneyland measles outbreak that is gripping the worlds vaccine promoters, time is running out for
doctors and researchers who see the bad and ugly side of vaccines and their adjuvants to do something about it.

Theres slim chance of a vaccine redesign in the absence of a profit incentive and a strong chance of universal vaccine
mandates for one and all - previous anaphylactic shock reaction or not.

Study Pulled From Publication After Proving Truth Of Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated
Children

The censorship of science is nothing new. In Canada, for instance, there were serious concerns
about the federal governments increasingly strict regulations that prevented scientists from sharing
their findings with the public.
Censorship, on the whole, is a persistently under-acknowledged problem in our society. The election of Donald
Trump certainly showcased the fact that the mainstream media only portrays the narratives they want us to see.

In the latest instance of scientific censorship, an article from a scientific journal was unpublished, but only after vaccine
enthusiasts proclaimed that it needed to be removed. The study, you see, examined the differences in health outcomes
between vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

The studys results indicated that:

Vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with
chickenpox and pertussis, but significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis
media, allergies and NDDs (defined as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,
and/or a learning disability).

From the mothers reports, the researchers found that vaccinated children were more likely to have allergies and
neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). The team noted that even after controlling for other factors, vaccination remained
significantly associated with the presence of an NDD.

VaxXed Stories: Social Engineering of Medical Professionals

Dr. Suzanne Humphries attends a meeting called "Confronting Vaccine Resistance: Strategies For Success" at NYU
Langone Medical Center in New York, New York on November 21, 2016.

This meetings speakers were Senator Richard Pan, Dr. Paul Offit and Dorit Rubenstein Reiss. Afterwards she comes out to
the VaxXed Bus to share what happened. Camera and editing by Joshua Coleman.

Indeed, those that were vaccinated were three times more likely to be diagnosed with an NDD such as autism. The
combination of preterm birth and vaccination produced an even higher risk of NDD, increasing the chances of it by more than
six-fold.

In the abstract, the researchers wrote in their conclusion;

In this study based on mothers reports, the vaccinated had a higher rate of allergies and NDD than the
unvaccinated. Vaccination, but not preterm birth, remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for
other factors.

However, preterm birth combined with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the
odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these
unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on childrens health.

Baxter Dmitry from Investment Watch Blog notes that the study was unpublished from the journal Frontiers In Public Health.
Normally, one can still view the cached version in internet archives.

But Baxter says this too was removed, noting that a cached version available on internet archives has also been removed,
suggesting there is a serious campaign to stop members of the public from viewing the study.

Fortunately, a screenshot of the study was saved before the whole thing was scrubbed off the internet for good.
Prior to being removed from the internet, the study was subjected to massive amounts of scrutiny; apparently in this instance,
the use of surveys which are widely used for data gathering somehow invites bias.

Some of the colorful public comments included;

This study is of poor design, though not impossible results. Study relies of self-report of moms, inducing
bias, and, Another garbage vaccine study in Frontiers journal. Scientists, stop reviewing/publishing there.
This, of course, is not the first time that a study that showcased the potential ill effects of vaccines has been pulled from the
internet. In February, the journal Vaccine temporarily removed, and eventually retracted, a study that linked the HPV vaccine
to behavioral issues in mice.

Publishing research that contains information that conflicts with the mainstream narrative continues to prove to be a quick and
easy way to find yourself blacklisted and censored by conventional media. This just underscores the importance
of independent research and alternative media outlets.

Related: Big Pharma now wants to vaccinate babies while theyre still in the womb

Fluoride Action Network: A Report From New Zealand

December 23 2016 | From: FluorideAlert

Two weeks ago legislation was introduced into the NZ Parliament in an attempt to force fluoridation
on the whole country. Currently, only half of New Zealands population is on fluoridated water. The
decision-making for fluoridation had been held by local councils since it was introduced starting in
the 1960s.

The proposed new legislation has only had its first reading at Parliament and must go through two more readings
before it becomes law. The next step is for this drafted legislation to go before the Health Select Committee and this
is where citizens can help make changes.

Related: The Question That Fluoridation Promoters Cant Answer

TV advert produced for Fluoride Free New Zealand. Shows that New Zealand is one of the few countries that still has
fluoridation and that other countries, without fluoridation, have just as good, if not better, teeth.

It also shows that there are public dental health policies that really work that could be implemented in NZ.
Fluoride Free NZ on Facebook / fluoridefree.org.nz

Legislation is often amended once the Committee involved has heard feedback from a wide range of people. So it is possible
that a strategic amendment might nullify the proposed legislation.

Interview With Dr. John Colquhoun, 1998

The legislation attempts to shift responsibility from the local councils to the District Health Boards (DHBs), but the DHBs are a
branch of the Ministry of Health in the Central Government, and are contractually obligated to do what the Ministry instructs.
The DHBs will only have a limited window with which to view the issue: they will only be allowed to consider dental health and
weigh that up against the costs of fluoridation.

Their purview will not include considering:

Health effects

Current fluoride exposure

A lternatives to fluoridation, like the Childsmile program in Scotland

ill not include consultation with the community

As far as dental health is concerned, the DHBs are being steered to a single survey carried out in 2009 that found a 40%
difference in dental decay rates. However, this survey was only a snapshot in time and did not take into consideration life time
residence.

The two studies published prior to this survey (that did look at life time residence), and a study published this year as well as
the New Zealand School Dental statistics (published every year) did not find any difference in decay rates. The only
differences that can be found in the School Dental statistics is for Maori children.

This fact distorts the picture because the non-fluoridated total includes the poorest area, with a high population of Maori
children, while the fluoridated total includes the wealthiest area. The sad irony in all this is that Maori children had perfect
teeth before the advent of western diets.

Related: Fluoride IQ Loss and the Brain

The Health Select Committee is inviting feedback from the public until the 2nd of February and will allow people to also speak
in person and by Skype to the Committee. The Hearing is likely to be February or March next year. This Committee is made
up of representatives from the top four political parties with the National Party (the current Government) making up the
majority.

The aim of Fluoride Free NZ (FFNZ) is to educate the Health Select Committee members in the hope that they will agree to
amendments to the legislation. We also aim to educate other Members of Parliament who are not on the Select Committee, so
that they are supportive of their members on the Select Committee making changes to the legislation.
Only 23 of the 67 NZ local councils still have any fluoridation, because FFNZ has managed to convince several councils to
stop over the past decade.

We also plan to put out as much publicity as our budget allows especially on health effects and the potential for fluoride to
damage to the brain so the general public become more informed and advise political parties and individual MPs that they
wont get their vote unless they change their stance.

As you will see from the Transcript and the video footage of the MPs that spoke at the first Parliamentary Reading of
the Bill - none of the MPs that spoke know very much about the subject.

Health Select Committee Chair Simon OConnor mistakenly credits his good teeth on taking fluoride tablets as a child.

Unbeknownst to him, the NZ Ministry of Health no longer recommends fluoride tablets because we now know
fluoride doesnt work by swallowing and fluoride tablets cause dental fluorosis!
Associate Health Minister Peter Dunne, who introduced the Bill, but fortunately is not on the Health Select Committee, has
called opponents of fluoridation tin-foil hat wearing, UFO-abducted pseudo-scientists.

He mustnt realise that he is insulting around half of the NZ population. Results from all referenda held in NZ show that people
tend to vote status quo. If a nationwide referendum was held tomorrow, we would have a good chance of winning.

Charges of anti-science are sounding rather ridiculous for those who have actually read the literature and even taken a
cursory look at the science presented by Michael Connett in the TSCA petition to the US EPA.

However, the ill-informed NZ media do not challenge these inaccurate and insulting attacks on fluoridation
opponents, thats why our advertising campaign is so important.

This really is crunch time for us in New Zealand. If we do not get changes to this draconian legislation, it will be nigh on
impossible to get it stopped where it has started and very, very difficult to resist its introduction to areas that dont have it, even
if the vast majority of the community, including local councillors, dont want it.

On the other hand, if we do get changes we could see an end to fluoridation completely in NZ and the fluoridated
world would get even smaller.

Why Does NZ Still Fluoridate?

Related: Undeniable Evidence From Numerous Studies Proves That Fluoride Causes Cancer

As many of your supporters know, when Prof Paul Connett was over here in New Zealand earlier in the year, we were able to
persuade a TV station in Auckland to host a 30-minute debate with a well-known NZ scientist, Prof Mike Berridge. We were
excited about this because Paul had been trying to get such a debate in NZ with someone who was pro-fluoridation for 12
years.

I think we can safely assume that our side won that debate because the proponents dont promote or mention this debate and
anyone who watched it can see that Paul won this debate. That is why during our campaign we are paying for this debate to
be aired again on NZ television 8 times on FACE SKY Channel 083.
You can also view the debate online anytime.

*If you have family or friends in NZ please send them this bulletin and encourage them to tell everyone they know that NZ is
under threat of mandatory fluoridation this includes Christchurch which has some of the most beautiful water in the world.

See all FAN bulletins online

Related Articles:

Water Fluoridation Linked to Diabetes and Low IQ

Study Finds Link Between Water Fluoridation And Diabetes

What's the only drug intentionally added to tap water? Fluoride

What does mandatory fluoridation mean for you?

Fluoride, the Only Drug Intentionally Added to Your Tap Water

Experts Admit That Fluoride May Be Completely Uselesss

Index of Fluorinated Pharmaceuticals

Hamilton to get two unfluoridated water filling stations

Kubrick Told Us about FLUORIDE in 1964

At Least 6 Dead, Hundreds Sickened In Australia Asthma Attacks *Triggered By

Thunderstorm* + Something Very Strange Is Going On In The Pacific - A 'Perfect
Cocktail' Of 'Toxic Death Dumps'
December 18 2016 | From: HealthNutNews/ AllNewsPipeline / Various

A recent thunderstorm during southeastern Australias humid November spring, triggered a rash of
asthma attacks across Melbourne last Monday, leaving families grieving in its wake.
At least four people died: 20-year-old law student Hope Carnevali died waiting for responders from Ambulance
Victoria to arrive, paramedics also struggled to resuscitate 35-year-old Apollo Papadopoulos, who eventually
succumbed to the respiratory attack.

Omar Majoulled, 18, died two days before what would have been his high school graduation. And Clarence Leo reportedly
died early Wednesday. Several more remained in Melbourne intensive care units.

Thunderstorm Asthma Hits Kuwait 10 Days After Melbourne

Only 10 days after Melbourne was attacked with Thunderstorm Asthma we have the same occurrence of this VERY
RARE PHENOMENON happening across the world in Kuwait. This is not a coincidence. Both places don't have
similar pollen problems.

This is BIO WARFARE. This is as a result of Geoengineering (CHEMTRAILS) which have taken place for many years now.
The consequences are now being exposed.
We tried to warn everyone over 5 years ago but as always people turn a blind eye to anything that resembles the truth.
Is it too late? We shall see in the coming months and years.

Between 6 p.m. and 11 p.m. on Monday, Ambulance Victoria took about 1,900 calls, which is nearly six times the usual
volume- that works out to about a days work in five hours. In fact, at their peak, 200 calls came within a span of 15 minutes.

From the article:

Since the first such events were recognized in the 1980s, there have been scattered reports of asthma attack
outbreaks during thunderstorms around the globe, including Napoli, Italy and Atlanta. The largest confirmed
episode to date was in London in June 1994.

Six hundred-forty Londoners visited emergency departments with complaints of asthma or respiratory problems, of
which more than a hundred were hospitalized, according to a 2016 review published in the journal Clinical &
Experimental Allergy.

Allergy experts posit that during the spring season, storms increase pollens ability to penetrate deep into the lungs. Because
the storms concentrate pollen grains near the ground, the grains swell with so much water that they rupture into tinier pieces.

Once dispersed into the air, the particles basically form a fine allergenic mist that if inhaled, winds up in bronchial crevasses
normally too small for unbroken grains to enter.
As "changes in climate" brings about more severe weather, respiratory disease scientists predict these types of thunderstorm
asthma outbreaks to happen with increased frequency. Were not sure we agree with these scientists and know some others
who disagree.

Hope Carnavelis relatives said they waited for more than a half an hour for an ambulance to arrive and would have taken her
straight to the emergency room had they known. Our hearts go out to all the grieving families.

Something Very Strange Is Going On In The Pacific - A 'Perfect Cocktail' Of 'Toxic Death
Dumps'

Were Nearly 10,000 Hospitalized In Australia Victims Of A Bio-Weapon Attack?

All News Pipeline received an email on Thursday from a reader who lives in Australia who was very concerned that
the recent 'thunderstorms' that killed at least 4 people and put 8,500+ others into hospitals around the Melbourne,
Australia area were anything but 'normal' thunderstorms.

As Samantha tells us, she is very concerned that a possible bioweapon attack had been carried out upon Australia and while
ANP is unable to confirm her theory at this time, we will outline some very strong evidence below that proves something very,
very strange indeed is going on in Australia and throughout large parts of the Pacific .

For those who may have missed it, back on Monday November 21st, massive thunderstorms kicked up a major
health emergency after 'heavy rain caused rye grass pollen to absorb moisture and burst, dispersing smaller
particles that became trapped in people's lungs', according to official reports.

Leading to the deaths of at least 4 people and the hospitalization of almost 10 thousand, medical experts there described the
event as unprecedented:

When we've had people calling for ambulances - one call every four-and-a-half seconds at the peak - it was like
having 150 bombs going off right across a particular part of metropolitan Melbourne," she said.

"That's something we've never planned for and we need to do that better."

And while most Americans and people across the entire world now know that we'll never get the truth about real
issues from the rapidly dying mainstream media, as we do our own research, there is plenty of evidence to indicate
that 'weather modification' is now taking place across Australia as well.

First, for those who still don't believe in weather warfare or weather modification, we suggest you read Steve Quayle's book
"Weather Wars And Un-Natural Disasters" and read up on all of the weather modification patents long documented by Dane
Wigington over at his Geoengineering Watch website.
Related: Weather Weapons Are Real, They Have A Treaty To Regulate Them

As this Thursday story from The Watchers tells us, a spell of very unusual weather has been reported across Australia over
the last few days with widespread snow falling in Tasmania on November 24th of 2016, only days before the arrival of their
summer.

We're also told that heavy rains, landslides and floods recently hit New Caledonia, an island just outside of Australia with huge
rainfall. We also hear reports of the use of massive amounts of chemtrails over Melbourne prior to the 'thunderstorm asthma
outbreak'.
Related: Chemtrails & Geoengineering

As we learned from the recent SQnote which linked to this story from Strange Sounds telling us Tokyo had seen their first
November snow storm in more than 50 years, this indicates weather warfare manipulation was secondary to the earthquake
generation.

Is it just a coincidence that a hurricane and earthquake also hit just off of the Pacific coast of Central America as shared in this
linked Yahoo news story and seen in the Drudge Report.

Was what happened in Australia some kind of a 'dry run' for additional weather warfare attacks in the future, possibly
upon much larger populations?

Imagine such a situation happening where you live - suddenly and out of the blue, a massive thunderstorm hits with howling
winds and heavy rainfall, stirring up all of the poisons that have been delivered by chemtrails sprayed upon us, sending
thousands to the hospitals unable to breath and dying.

We can hear TPTB right now:

Just blame it on the weather... 'thunderstorm asthma'...yeah, that's it."

Well, ANP reader Samantha in Australia isn't buying it and, very few others are buying the official explanation either.

From theories of a perfect cocktail of poisons being sprayed upon them to 'toxic death dumps', we also see that
people from other parts of the world are also reporting death being sprayed upon them from above as well.

Will the world ever get the truth about chemtrails and weather modification? If you asked the MSM, any and all such talk is
'fake news', despite years and years of weather modification patents and official US govt documents to prove them wrong.
The Question That Fluoridation Promoters Cant Answer
December 17 2016 | From: FluorideAlert

During 2016, I asked this question to many fluoridation promoters and have yet to receive an
adequate scientific answer.

I asked it in several audiences in New Zealand and also to promoters at a council hearing in Naples, Florida and most
recently at a debate in Cortland, New York with Johnny Johnson and Steve Slott. Neither Johnson nor Slott,
otherwise very vocal on promoting fluoridation, had an answer.

Related: Why Does NZ Still Fluoridate? TV Commercial FFNZ

The Question to Promoters of Fluoridation:

What primary scientific studies (not bogus reviews conducted by pro-fluoridation agencies) can you cite
that gives you the confidence to ignore or dismiss the evidence that fluoride damages the brain as
documented in over 300 animal and human studies (including 50 IQ studies).

If proponents cannot provide an adequate scientific answer to this question: fluoridation should be halted
immediately.

On Nov 22, 2016, Michael Connett, JD, asked this question to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), on behalf of
FAN, Food & Water Watch, Organic Consumers Association, American Academy of Environmental Medicine, International
Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology, Moms Against Fluoridation, and several individual mothers, in a petition calling on
the EPA to ban the deliberate addition of fluoridating chemicals to the drinking water under provisions in the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA).

The EPA has 90 days to reply, and if they fail to provide a satisfactory reply then they can be taken to Federal Court.

How you can take this further?

We are requesting that each one of you to ask this question of any promoter of fluoridation and keep asking it throughout
2017 until you can get an answer. Send that answer to us.

Based on responses we have seen so far we anticipate that there will be no satisfactory answers. In our view, there is no
scientific evidence that could justify ignoring the large number of scientific studies that fluoride damages the brain and thus no
justification for continuing this unethical and reckless practice of deliberately adding fluoridating chemicals to the drinking
water.

This in essence will be our 2017 campaign. Very simple, very direct and very important. We hope that you will support this in
two ways: a) ask this showstopper question in as many creative ways as you can and as many times as you can, and b)
support FAN financially.

Five More Ways to Take Action:

1. Send a letter-to-the-editor to your local newspapers

2. Sign on to FANs petition to the EPA.

3. Send the press release to your media outlets

4. Share this Facebook and this Twitter post.

5. Make a donation to support this campaign (see below).

Fundraising Update
Our new totals are $70,150 from 235 donors. We will be updatinng our running totals on a daily basis on our home
page: www.FluorideACTION.net

Related Articles:

Undeniable Evidence From Numerous Studies Proves That Fluoride Causes Cancer

New Zealand Government Plans To Drown Its Citizens In Toxic Fluorides

Auckland: No Consultation Needed For Stopping Or Starting Fluoridation + Decision Is An Attack On Democracy

Fluoride: Poison On Tap Official Trailer

The Fluoride Deception

New Zealand Fluoridation Review Unscientific And Intellectually Dishonest Say International Reviewers

Fluoride Free New Zealand: Dirty Science

Secret Fluoridation Review Totally One-Sided Admits Chair

Harvard Research Finds Link Between Fluoridated Water, ADHD & Mental Disorders

How To Hack Your Biology To Improve Creativity And Thinking Skills

December 14 2016 | From: OmniThought

One of the secrets to hack your biology to improve creativity and thinking skills is to learn how to
relax your body and mind using breathing techniques.

A great breathing technique that creates coherence between the heart, brain, body and mind involves breathing
through the heart.

Related: Meditation Literally Rebuilds Your Brain

Breathing through the heart has been scientifically proven to improve energy flow, creativity, performance and thinking skills.

When doing this breathing exercise, focus your attention and awareness to the center of your heart and imagine breathing
through your heart. You can also imagine breathing through your heart chakra. Slow, smooth, rhythmic and deep breaths are
the best breaths for harmonizing the energy of your body and mind.

Every time I do this heart-centered breathing exercise, I notice a significant improvement in my thinking skills and creativity.
Furthermore, I am able to handle stress and anxiety better, which in turn improves my performance under pressure.

Below is a great video that shows you how to use breathing techniques to improve your creativity, performance and thinking
skills. Here is an excerpt about the video from YouTube:

Alan is the founder and CEO of Complete Coherence Ltd. He is recognised as an international expert on
leadership and human performance. He has researched and published widely on both subjects for over 18 years.

He is currently an Honorary Senior Lecturer in Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine at Imperial College,
London as well as an Affiliate Professor of Leadership at the European School of Management, London. He
originally qualified as a physician, has a first class degree in psychology and a PhD in immunology.

Whatever you decide to do (sports, hobbies, being healthy, driving, cooking, talking, etc!) you can hack your life
and increase your rate of success! All you have to do is understand the concept of the Triune brain, control your
breathing (Coherent Breathing), a 30/50% grip strength, and make your tools an extension of your body.

Take all this with a perfect body weight transfer (mostly for sports), empty your mind and let your vision do the
work.
How to Hack Your Biology and be in the Zone Every Single Day

Why Your Body Needs Sulfur And How to Get The Amount You Need
December 6 2016 | From: ConsciousLifeNews

Sulfur is the third most abundant mineral in your body, based on percentage of total body weight.
While close to half of it can be found in your muscles, skin and bones, sulfur plays important roles
in hundreds of physiological processes.

Sulfur bonds are required for proteins to maintain their shape, and these bonds determine the biological activity of
the proteins.

Related: All This Heart Stuff Including: Is Heart Disease From A Sulfur Deficiency?

For example, hair and nails consist of a tough protein called keratin, which is high in sulfur, whereas connective tissue and
cartilage contain proteins with flexible sulfur bonds, giving the structure its flexibility.

With age, the flexible tissues in your body tend to lose their elasticity, leading to sagging and wrinkling of skin, stiff muscles
and painful joints. A shortage of sulfur likely contributes to these age-related problems.
Sulfur, Cholesterol and Vitamin D Work in Tandem

In 2011, I interviewed Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT, about the influence of sulfur on health and
disease. Ive included that interview above for your convenience.

Sulfur deficiency is quite common - in part due to demineralization of soils - and may be a contributing factor in health
problems such as obesity, heart disease, Alzheimers and chronic fatigue, just to name a few.

Studies have also noted that sulfur is helpful for conditions such as skin disorders, arthritis and shingles, for example,
suggesting sulfur plays an important role in these conditions as well. Importantly, Seneff discusses the connections between
cholesterol, sulfur and vitamin D.

She points out that heart disease may actually be related to cholesterol sulfate deficiency, and explains how elevated LDL
cholesterol is a sign of this deficiency. In short, high LDL (incorrectly referred to as bad cholesterol) is your bodys way of
compensating for cholesterol sulfate deficiency.
Related: Vitamin D is Key to Cancer Prevention: 10 Signs Youre Not Getting Enough

When LDL is turned into plaque, blood platelets inside the plaque produce cholesterol sulfate, which your heart and brain
needs for optimal function. Seneff also explains why lowering LDL with statins can lead to heart failure.

Essentially, by elevating LDL, your body is protecting itself from the harmful effects of cholesterol sulfate deficiency. When
you simply remove the LDL, you remove this backup mechanism aimed at keeping your heart going strong. As a result,
heart failure becomes a distinct possibility.

How Sun Exposure Helps Optimize Cardiovascular Health

That said, high LDL IS correlated with cardiovascular disease, so the question then becomes: How can your body produce
cholesterol sulfate without having to create harmful LDL?

Under normal, healthy conditions, your skin synthesizes vitamin D3 sulfate when exposed to sunlight. Vitamin D3 sulfate is
water soluble and can travel freely in your blood stream. If you have sufficient amounts of vitamin D3 sulfate in circulation,
your body does not need to produce more LDL to create sulfate-producing plaque.
In essence, sensible sun exposure may be an important part of heart and cardiovascular health. Vitamin D3 supplements,
on the other hand, are unsulfated. This is a significant drawback, as the unsulfated form needs LDL as a vehicle of
transport.

Seneffs suspicion is that the oral non-sulfated form of vitamin D likely will not provide the same benefits as the vitamin D
created in your skin from sun exposure, because it cannot be converted to vitamin D sulfate.

Sulfur-Rich Vegetables

Fibrous, non-leafy vegetables are rich in sulfur. Examples include:

Cruciferous veggies such as cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, mustard greens and bok choy

Alliums such as onions, shallots, garlic and leeks

Edible stalks and stems such as celery, fennel and asparagus

Cruciferous vegetables have become well known for their anti-cancer properties, and the organosulfur compound
sulforaphane is one of the primary compounds responsible for this effect. As noted by The Worlds Healthiest Foods:

[S]ulforaphane increases the activity of the livers Phase 2 detoxification enzymes. These enzymes are well
known for their ability to clear a wide variety of toxic compounds from the body including not only many
carcinogens, but also many reactive oxygen species, a particularly nasty type of free radical.

By jump starting these important detoxification enzymes, compounds in crucifers provide protection against cell
mutations, cancer and numerous other harmful effects that would otherwise be caused by these toxins.

Prepare Your Broccoli Correctly to Optimize Sulfur Content

As described in a previous article, to maximize the cancer-fighting potential of broccoli its important to not overcook it. You
also dont want to eat it raw. When you eat raw mature broccoli, you only get about 12 percent of the total sulforaphane
content theoretically available based on the parent compound.
Steaming your broccoli spears for three to four minutes will optimize the sulforaphane content by eliminating epithiospecifier
protein - a heat-sensitive sulfur-grabbing protein that inactivates sulforaphane - while still retaining the enzyme myrosinase,
which converts glucoraphanin to sulforaphane.

Without it, you cannot get any sulforaphane. Avoid boiling or microwaving your broccoli past the one-minute mark, as this
will destroy a majority of the myrosinase.

Related: Enzyme In Broccoli Appears to Slow Aging (& Benefits You in Other Powerful Ways)

If you want to boil your broccoli, blanch it in boiling water for no more than 20 to 30 seconds, then immerse it in cold water to
stop the cooking process. Adding myrosinase-containing food, such as mustard seed, daikon radishes, wasabi or cole slaw
to the broccoli can maximize sulforaphane content even further.

Other Sulfur-Rich Foods

Other foods that are high in sulfur include:

Protein-rich animal products such as organic pastured egg yolks, grass-fed beef, organic pastured chicken and
wild-caught fish

Nuts such as walnuts, almonds and cashews

Seeds such as sesame seeds and sunflower seeds

Dairy products such as milk, cheese and sour cream (ideally from organic grass-fed cows)

Certain fruits: coconut, bananas, pineapple and watermelon

Despite the fact that sulfur is found in many foods, it can still be a challenge to get sufficient amounts from your diet. Again,
this is largely a problem stemming from the demineralization of soils in which the food is grown.

Perhaps the best way to ensure sufficient amounts of sulfur from your diet is to cook down bones from organically raised
animals into bone broth.

Either drink the broth regularly, or use for soups and stews. The connective tissues are sulfur-rich, and when you slow-cook
the bones, you dissolve these nutrients out of the bone and into the water.
Sulfur Supplements

Sulfur can also be obtained through supplementation with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or methylsulfonylmethane (MSM).
DMSO is primarily used in veterinary medicine. In animals, DMSO has been found to support soft tissue health and helps
heal soft-tissue injury.

In humans, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved DMSO for intravesical use in the treatment of
interstitial cystitis. DMSO can also be found in creams and oral supplements but are best avoided. Industrial DMSO is a
byproduct of paper making, and may contain impurities.

Great care is required to make sure youre getting a quality, pharmaceutical grade product, so do not use DMSO without
medical supervision. DMSO may also interact with a number of medications. All in all, youre far better off using MSM, as its
far safer and doesnt appear to have any adverse drug interactions.

MSM for Osteoarthritic Knee Pain

MSMs primary benefits are related to its ability to reduce inflammation. In your body, about 15 percent of DMSO breaks
down into MSM, and MSM is 34 percent sulfur by weight. MSM is more than just a simple sulfur donor, however. It also
affects sulfur metabolism, but its still not entirely clear how.

As a supplement, MSM (which is a metabolite of DMSO) is widely used in the treatment of pain, especially pain associated
with arthritic conditions. One clinical trial found that people with osteoarthritis of the knee who took 3 grams for MSM twice a
day for 12 weeks experienced significantly decreased pain and improved physical function, compared to a placebo.

Another study found that patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis benefited from oral glucosamine and MSM, both
individually and in combination. Here, the treatment groups received 500 milligrams (mg) of glucosamine and/or 500 mg of
MSM three times a day for 12 weeks. According to the authors:

Glucosamine, MSM and their combination produced an analgesic and anti-inflammatory effect in osteoarthritis.
Combination therapy showed better efficacy in reducing pain and swelling and in improving the functional ability of
joints than the individual agents.
 All the treatments were well tolerated. The onset of analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity was found to be more
rapid with the combination than with glucosamine. It can be concluded that the combination of MSM with
glucosamine provides better and more rapid improvement in patients with osteoarthritis.

Toxicity studies have shown that MSM is extremely safe and can be taken at very high doses. Even if you eat plenty of
MSM-rich foods, you can still supplement and not hit that toxicity level. Clinical research studies have found the effective
amounts range from about 1.5 grams to 6 grams.

That said, potential side effects at higher doses include intestinal discomfort, ankle swelling and skin rashes. These are
likely detoxifying effects that can typically be mitigated or minimized by cutting back on the initial dosage and slowly working
your way up. To learn more about MSM and its uses, please see my previous article, MSM Health Benefits May Be Related
to Its Sulfur Content .

The Benefits of Epsom Salts

Epsom salt (magnesium sulfate) is made up of magnesium, sulfur and oxygen. While most of the benefits associated with
Epsom salt baths relates to magnesium - such as improved sleep, stress reduction and reduced pain and muscle cramping -
its sulfur content is also important for health.

As mentioned earlier, sulfur plays an important role in detoxification, and people who struggle with toxicity will often have a
deficiency in the sulfation pathway. As explained in Enzyme Stuff:

[M]ost people with autism conditions have a deficiency in a key detoxification pathway. The pathway involves
using sulfur in the form of sulfate (known as sulfation). The enzyme involved is phenol sulfur-transferase (PST), but
the problem is thought to hinge on an inadequate supply of usable sulfate ions, not the metabolic enzyme itself.

Dr. [Rosemary] Waring found that most children on the autism spectrum are very low in sulfate and may be as low
as 15 percent of the amount in neurologically typical people. People with low or no ability to convert compounds to
sulfate have problems handling environmental chemicals, some medications, and even some chemicals produced
within the body.

They include people with other conditions such as Alzheimers disease, Parkinsons disease, rheumatoid arthritis
and chemical sensitivities.

The PST sulfation pathway is necessary for the breakdown and removal of certain toxins in the body. This includes
the processing of a type of chemical called a phenol All foods contain some phenolic compounds. However,
some foods have a much higher content than others do. If the sulfation pathway is not functioning well, a person
may not be able to process out the phenolic compounds as fast as they consume them.

There is a cumulative effect. When the phenols start backing up in the system, it can cause a myriad of negative
reactions. Symptoms of phenol intolerance include night waking, night sweats, irritability, eczema and other skin
conditions. The symptoms of phenol intolerance and yeast may be very similar because they both involve the body
trying to deal with toxins.

Toxicity May Cause Sulfur Food Intolerance

Its quite common for people with mercury toxicity to have poor tolerance for foods high in sulfur. The sulfur mobilizes
mercury (and other toxins), thereby causing adverse effects. Other food ingredients, such as food dyes, can exacerbate
PST sulfation pathway problems by further suppressing PST enzyme activity.

To address this situation, its recommended you:

Go on a low-sulfur diet to reduce the amount of phenols you consume

 Reduce the amount of toxins entering your body by eating organic and avoiding household toxins of all kinds

As your toxicity is reduced, you can start adding sulfur-rich foods back into your diet, one at a time. Next, its important to
enhance your bodys detoxification process by supplying more sulfate.

MSM, or the sulfur-containing amino acids cysteine and taurine can be used, but Epsom salt baths are often preferable here
as the sulfur in Epsom salt is readily available to your body without having to be converted.

As a general recommendation, use 1 to 2 cups of Epsom salt to a tub of water. The warmer the water, the more of the salt
will be dissolved, and the more your body will be able to absorb, as the heat opens your pores.

If you experience a negative reaction, such as irritability or hyperactivity, decrease the amount used and incrementally
increase the amount based on your tolerance. Alternatively, use one part Epsom salt to two parts water for a foot bath. Soak
your feet for about 30 minutes.

Sulfur Is Important for Optimal Health

In summary, your body needs sulfur to detoxify, but if youre excessively toxic, youll have to go slow. If your detox pathways
are not working properly, adding a lot of sulfur can overload your system with mobilized toxins, making you extremely ill.

You have to first stop the toxic input, and then support your bodys natural detoxification processes. Sulfur is an important
part of that. Without it, your body simply cannot mobilize and release toxins.
Sulfur is also important for heart and cardiovascular health, mitochondrial health, insulin function and vitamin conversion. In
all, sulfur deficiency may be a hidden factor contributing to the ill health of many.

So, if you or someone you love struggles with any of the conditions mentioned here, including but not limited to high LDL,
attention deficit syndromes, autism, obesity, arthritis, Alzheimers and chronic fatigue, you may want to take steps to
improve your sulfur status, and see if your condition improves.

Related: The Health & Healing Benefits Of Organic Sulphur (Sulfur): MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane)

Introduction / Overview: The Healing ComputerTechnology

December 5 2016 | From: NeilKeenan

The Healing Computer (a new name will be decided upon in due course) can be used to treat any
person with the only exceptions being pregnant women, children under the age of 12 years,
people with pacemaker implants, and people with metal body part replacements.
The Healing Computer technology optimizes the Human immune system to its maximum operational level, in
order to deal with any diseases of the body, including mental / psychotic.

In short, this technology will heal anything that the Human immune system can resolve itself when it is working
unhindered and at its greatest possible capacity.

The immune system protects the body against disease or other potentially damaging foreign bodies. When
functioning properly, the immune system identifies and attacks a variety of threats, including viruses, bacteria and
parasites, while distinguishing them from the bodys own healthy tissue. The Human body can heal itself of any
disease however because of factors such as environmental toxins most peoples immune systems are
compromised, which leads to disease.

When used regularly, this technology maintains the bodys immune system at such a high level that any and all detrimental
intrusions (chemicals, toxins, pollutants, and other stressors) will be repelled, and the body will be cleared and cleansed by
way of its own natural processes.
The process begins with a scan which takes three minutes

The main concept of this technology is not to fight against disease but to boost the immune system in order to most
effectively fight against disease.

By enabling the Human immune system to operate at its optimal level, the body naturally repels all detrimental matter
including parasites, fungus, worms and literally anything and everything that does not belong in the Human body.

The Healing Computer works with Biofeedback and millions of frequencies and is not comparable to other healing
machines currently available, especially those that use only 1,000 2,000 frequencies.

There is currently no definitive list of treatable ailments, but in principle this system will treat any disease, because the
immune system is capable of healing any ailment when it is operating at its highest potential.

Clinical study material will be available at the time that translations into English are completed. Foreign language versions
are not available at this time.

The core operating principle of this technology is to find any weakness in the immune system (usually caused by illness /
fungus / worms / parasites / toxins) and to enable the optimization of the immune system / metabolism to fight against any
detrimental intrusions.
Chakra analysis is part of the process

This technology will search out and find existing problems within the Human body almost immediately. No blood tests are
required.

Immediate findings are made within 2-3 minutes, a diagnostic reading is given and then the healing process begins; the
duration of which is approximately 18-20 minutes per session.

The number of sessions required is entirely dependent on the ailments discovered and the system will advise as to the
number of sessions required along with their duration. Records are kept within the system regarding patients in order to
track progress.

The first treatment clinic will be opening in Europe in 2017. Treatment costs will be calculated by the length of time required,
i.e. how long the initial session takes and the subsequent sessions required to restore the immune system to its highest
operational level.
Aura analysis is part of the process

Further clinic details are not available at this time but will be available closer to the time of opening.

We cannot emphasize strongly enough that there is no other healing system in existence that is comparable to this
technology in terms of strength or effectiveness.

Source: System Co-Developer

Recent Developments:

One of the first people to take advantage of the limited offer of private sales of the Healing Computer was an elderly lady
who was in late stage suffering of Pancreatic cancer she had been told she was about to die.

Six days after beginning treatment on the Healing Computer this patient was tested and pronounced to be free of all
cancerous tumors and brain metastasis by her Doctor. The Doctor was stunned and declared this healing technology to be
Futuristic.

Another recipient of Healing Computer treatment had Lupus, and that person was cleared of Lupus after one month of
treatments.
The system builds a frequency treatment based upon the scan

Other people have presented with influenza and the common cold and have been immediately treated; reinstated to being
completely well again in just one treatment session.

The establishment claims there is no cure for the common cold, that there is no cure for Lupus, and that there is no cure for
Cancer and yet we appear to have all three of them successfully addressed here.

Additionally, in Brazil an AIDS-specific treatment program using the Healing Computers has seen complete recovery for
patients with AIDS within one month. These machines are being used quietly to effectively treat the AIDS epidemic in Brazil.

It is important to acknowledge that every person is unique in the responses of their body, and the time taken for complete
recovery from any disease is going to vary depending on how quickly their body is able to respond to the treatment.

Comment:

Neil receives numerous messages asking why he and Group K do not just get up and go; return to Indonesia, travel
through the jungles and clear out the bunkers.

It doesnt work like that.

It takes a ton of money, he has spent a ton of money to date and what is required now is not Neil just jumping on a plane
and marching off into oblivion all on his lonesome.

The situation is extremely serious now and Neil & Co. cannot return to Indonesia without sufficient funding for
security and an array of other necessary items in order to complete that final stage safely and securely.

The Healing Computer has saved Neil's life. The results with his feet would be better if Neil had his own machine and he
could have a proper treatment run every three days, rather than chipping away at it on intermittent trips to Germany.

And so the armchair critics who have never made an ounce of effort toward this mission can shut the hell up. Neil will get
up and go when he is ready and able to and if anyone has an issue with that in the interim, then they can put their money
where their mouth is or sit down and shut up in the cheap seats.
It should be noted that the briefing document on the following link was requested by Donald Trump and the matters within
are on the agenda of a scheduled meeting to be held soon:

NEIL KEENAN UPDATE | Recommendations & Background For President-Elect Donald J. Trump

Just remember, Group K is only a small team that has done more than entire Nations have dared.

Notes:

A limited number of Healing Computers will be available for private sale up until the first clinics begin to open. The only
reason that a limited number of Healing Computers have been made available is because Neil has been close friends with
the developers for some years now.

Treatment results are tracked over time and stored within the system

Please direct all enquiries regarding the opportunity to purchase one of these systems, and expressions of interest in visiting
a clinic for treatment to:

contact@neilkeenan.com

Please note that there is currently no other website with further information about this technology, nor are any contact details
for the first clinic available at this time. Updates will be issued by way of this website in due course.

Article Links:

Videos of a Healing Computer in operation may be seen in the following articles:

NEIL KEENAN UPDATE | As Promised Now I Am Delivering: The Healing Computer

NEIL KEENAN UPDATE | The Wait Is Over: Healing Computer Video Part II
A PDF version of the Healing Computer Introduction may be downloaded here.

The 'Smart' Meter Itself Is The Hazardous Condition + Studies On Radiation From
Smart Meters Show That Electromagnetic Frequencies Disrupt And Damage The
Nervous System
December 5 2016 | From: MichiganStopSmartMeters / NaturalNews

In the following article, originally written by Electrical Engineer William Bathgate, as a public
comment to the Michigan Public Service Commission, Mr. Bathgate considers safety issues with
the new electric meters as related to our current discussion of a proposed rule change concerning
emergency shutoffs for hazardous conditions.

Revisions to this article are indicated in blue and consist mainly in the addition of a section dealing with the lack of
lightning arrestors in the AMI meters. Case No. U-18120 Proposed Rule 460.137 37(1)(a) & 37(1)(i) A utility may
shut off or deny service to a customer without notice, if a condition on the customers premises is determined by
the utility or a governmental agency to be hazardous.

Related: What Do Smart Meters And Vaccinations Have In Common? + Another Vaccine Dump

I hold an electrical engineering and mechanical engineering degree and previously was employed through late 2015 for 8
years at the Emerson Electric Company.

While at Emerson Electric I was the Senior Program Manager for Power Distribution Systems and in charge of an RF and IP
based digitally controlled high power AC power switching system product line in use in over 100 countries and I was also
directly responsible for product certifications such as UL, CE and many other countries electrical certification bodies.

I am very familiar with the electrical and electronic design of the AMI meters in use because I was responsible for very
similar products with over 1 Million units installed across the world.

I have just reviewed the transcripts of the hearing held in Lansing on this subject and came to realize there were many
comments regarding the issues identified from the effects of both the RF emitting AMI meter and the non RF emitting AMI
Opt-Out Meter.
Related: "Smart City" Is Really Government Spying On An Unimaginable Scale

I have personally tested the RF emissions from the AMI meter and measured that the meter does not send data just a few
times a day as the utilities publish.

It actually sends an RF pulse about every 4-5 seconds constantly and a longer duration RF emission after midnight
running about 3-5 minutes.

There is no need for the AMI meter to send a pulse every 4-5 seconds all day just to synchronize and time stamp the clock
inside the meter, the meter only needs to send data once a day for 3-5 minutes.

All these pulse transmissions the AMI meter is doing is a complete waste of energy and because it is a short but
frequently pulsing signal that is not needed to measure power consumption, it is creating needless health effects
and is impacting consumers as evidenced in the testimony.

Some consumers have been affected to the point of near death experiences. The Mesh Network design is saturating the
environment with RF transmissions mostly for the purpose of the network synchronization not the consumption
measurement of power. I could not think of a worse network design for a power measurement device.

...

Analog Meters contained no electronic circuit boards and while not 100% immune from the effects of a lightning strike, they
are much more tolerant than the AMI meter.

Summary:

The MPSC has been asked to grant the Utilities the ability to turn off power to people and businesses without notice
for Dangerous or Hazardous conditions.

Based on my professional examination of the metering technology deployed with AMI meters, the meters themselves
are Dangerous or Hazardous due to their Lightning vulnerabilities, EMI and RF emissions.

There has been a disregard for the health and safety effects of these AMI meters on the general population by the utilities
and their AMI supplier. So by their own lack of definition of Dangerous or Hazardous all AMI meters deployed at present
need to be subject to shut off of service without notice due to Dangerous or Hazardous conditions.

Related: Hundreds Of Smart Meters Simultaneously Explode

...

The current AMI meters are not safe, as evidenced of the dramatic testimony of residents that are suffering terribly and the
engineering analysis such as I and many others in this field have performed.

Related Articles:
Smart Meters Not Needed After All For European Power Grid + How To Opt Out From Smart Meters

Utility Smart Meters A Probable Terrorist Connection Unveiled?

The Disturbingly Aggressive Roll Out Of Smart AKA Advanced Meters - While Children Starve And The Elderly
Freeze In Rural Aotearoa (NZ)

Kuia Worried Smart Meter Is Affecting Her Health

Nelson Woman Faces Hefty Power Bill Because Of Smart Meter - Contact Now In Damage Control

Studies On Radiation From Smart Meters Show That Electromagnetic Frequencies

Disrupt And Damage The Nervous System
For some years now, health and technology experts have warned that smart meters being installed
at homes all over the country may be emitting hazardous electronic waves that can damage the
nervous system.
Related: Reports Of Illness Prompt Audit Of Smart Meter Radiation

Now, as reported by Natural Blaze, a demonstration in a newly released video is groundbreaking in its portrayal of
just how smart meters are harming us.

Many people know that these smart meters communicate with power companies via microwave signals. What has was not
known until now is that additional frequencies from these meters are also transmitted in the 2 to 50 kilohertz range.

Several studies have shown that those same frequency ranges are disruptive to the human nervous system. Some studies
refer to it as "nerve block" in describing what takes place.

Natural Blaze further noted that these are not controversial studies, meaning there are no studies that show a different
result. Nerve block that is induced by frequencies in the 2 to 50 kHz range are a well-established fact. What's more, these
studies come from reputable sources, as well as the standard for electricity, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers.

The Evidence is Clear: Smart Meters Emit Harmful Energy Frequencies

As noted in the video, the meters emit radiation via the high frequencies. The video, which was produced by Warren
Woodward at his home, compared a standard analog energy meter to smart meters, which showed a major difference in
"the waveform."

"It's very disturbing," Woodward said.

Using equipment to measure electrical waveforms, Woodward and an assistant used an oscillator to measure waveforms
emitting first from the analog meter, and then from the smart meter. The signal differences were significant - enough to wake
someone at night, said Woodward's assistant, Paul.

As we previously reported, smart meters have been increasingly tied to a wave of mysterious conditions and illnesses.
Related: Not So Smart Technology: Safety Inspector Blows The Whistle On Fire Hazards Of 'Smart' Electronics

The EMF Safety Network, in particular, has documented complaints including sleep problems, stress, agitation, irritability,
headaches, memory and concentration problems, fatigue, disorientation, nausea, leg cramps and even cardiac symptoms.
Click the link above to see the full list of documented problems.

We noted that Cancer.org says smart meters "talk" to their central control systems using RF transmissions, based on cell
phone, pager, satellite, radio, power line, WiFi or Internet-communications methods. "Internet and cell phone applications
have become the preferred options because of their flexibility and ease of deployment," the organization noted.

Power Companies Will Not be Motivated on Their Own to Stop Installing Smart Meters

As Woodward noted, several studies have found that the frequencies being emitted by the smart meters are in fact causing
harm. That means "people injured by smart meters are not hypochondriacs," Woodward noted in the video.

He added that because of what his experiment has shown, it could be that people injured by the meters have legitimate
court cases against power companies that use them, via personal injury lawsuits.
Related: Top Biochemist Calls To Abolish Smart Meters, WiFi In Schools, And Baby Monitors

"This is real. You saw it on the oscilloscope," he continued, adding that he encouraged power companies and other
scientists to conduct their own research on this issue.

He also said that state utility regulators and public health agencies should now be spurred on to do their jobs, which used to
always include protecting the public by promoting public health and safety when it comes to smart meters. And finally, he
noted, the U.S. Department of Energy;

Will have to bring an immediate halt to the promotion and subsidization of the wireless 'smart' grid," because of
the harm it is causing humans.

It's not likely that power companies will move on their own, so it will take legal action on the part of those who are injured to
get them motivated enough to do the right thing. Most Americans are in favor of modernizing our power grid and making it
more efficient, but not at the expense of our health.

Related: Britains IoD: Smart Meters Are A Government IT Disaster Waiting To Happen

Could This Healthy 23 Year Olds Cardiac Arrest Have Been Caused by Exposure To
1080? + The Stock Deaths From 1080 Poison & How DOC Is Hiding Them In The Paper
Work
December 4 2016 | From: EnviroWatchRangitikei

We will never know because the NZ laboratoy lost her heart!

This story crossed my path recently on Facebook. It is apparently an old one, coming as it does from 2006. It is
nevertheless a shocking story in more ways than one.

Related: 1080: NZ Animals Killed For No Reason In $80m Yearly 1080 Drops

Shocking and sad for the family of this young woman, Whitney Robie was only 23. She had been hiking in the South Island,
felt unwell, and after retiring to bed, died in her sleep of a sudden cardiac arrest it was later ascertained. Now they are left
with few answers and no real closure regarding the why of her death. Read on.

She had come here to our clean green paradise to live. Sadly she died here.
NZ is not clean and green people, it is severely polluted and toxic now -and worse, our authorities lie about that

Sudden accidental deaths (SADs) do happen however this story has some anomalies which could have but have not been
solved due to a medical blunder. It is thanks to a GP who followed up on Whitney & questioned friends at the hostel where
she was staying, that we have a little more of this story than we would otherwise have known.

Losing a heart for one thing is a shocker in itself. In a random and ordinary course of events such a mistake is feasible. But
with a sudden unexplained death of a very healthy, active young woman how could this possibly happen? When the
clues to her death clearly lay within an analysis of her hearts condition, how could they simply LOSE her heart? Well lose it
they did. Or so they say.

The official story about this loss can be found at the following link:

Family face long wait over backpackers lost heart

A journalist who has been following this story for some time and says it has been shared more than 150 times now,
has re posted it on Facebook with the attendant detail from when it first became news here is the train of events
as described by her (edited for brevity & omission of personal detail):

Regarding Whitney Robie, she went hiking on her own in a 1080d area (I believe it was gel/jelly) and felt unwell
that evening, said so, went to bed and had a cardiac arrest in the night.

She was 23. From the USA, her obituary described how she was full of life, fit, loved the outdoors and had moved
to NZ for an adventure.

She had no previous history of heart problems.

The Doctor concerned said he had gone to the hostel and spoken to the other guests straight after she died. Later
when he heard her death had been recorded as a heart attack, he advised and pressed the authorities to run tests
relating to possible 1080 exposure.

He was told however that the matter was now officially closed. Her heart was sent for post mortem and was lost
 by the govt laboratory. This Dunedin GP was so concerned that he made a submission to ERMA in 2007 that
included this account.

It was his opinion that the most probable cause of her death was 1080 poisoning, and that many others in NZ over
the years have also died from it but that their deaths are either mistakenly or deliberately misdiagnosed.

A letter to the editor in 2006 commenting on the actions of the Doctor involved gives further information about the
unexplained early deaths of people working with 1080."

Read the pdf here: Cancer-deaths-from-1080

Here are some points to consider about this story:

The 1080 Reassessment Application document for ERMA Oct 2006. Section 3.3 Hazard Classifications. Sub section 4.8.2
[has the] Heart as a target organ.

Related: Invasion of the Alien Species

4.8.2. Heart as a target organ That single or repeated sublethal exposures to fluoroacetate can have toxic effects
on the heart has been recognised for some time (e.g. Steyn 1934; Quin and Clark 1947; Hicks 1952).

In general, the action of fluoroacetate on the heart is to decrease the metabolic energy available in heart muscle,
which affects the conduction system controlling the rate and strength of heart beats (e.g. Chenoweth and Gilman
 1947)

Found on page 11 of the pdf

St Johns put out their Sudden Cardiac Arrest Annual Report in June and it shows the figures for rural as opposed to
urban. The rates are far far higher in rural areas.

Rural New Zealanders had more than double the incidence of cardiac arrest than those in urban centres
approximately 160 versus 78 (per 100,000 person-years).

1080 is effective as a poison regardless of the mode of entry. It can be absorbed by the intact skin, but not readily,
however it is easily absorbed through cuts, abrasions, and is rapidly absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract and through
the lungs. One teaspoon of 1080 is enough to kill 30-100 adults weighing around 150 pounds. The potential for misuse is
great

How toxic is 1080? Toxicologist explains Professor Ian Shaw explores why and how 1080 is so toxic and asks what
is the risk of a child dying from contaminated formula.

The main point is that although these deaths may or may not be attributed to 1080, more importantly, if
nobody looks and checks then we are left with this element of doubt.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Plausible deniability is not good enough.

There are questions that are not being answered or even addressed.

It recently came to light from an Official Information request that DOC had lost 89 Kiwi , and yet they had
not tested one of them for 1080. Doing so is not rocket science.

A blogger, NZRose commented here recently:

My partner and I spoke to the poison people late last year. They are contracted to lay everything from cyanide to feratox to
take care of the pests on behalf of the NZ Government.

I will never forget them laughing as they said that the 1080 had been doubled more than a year prior to our conversation.
When we asked why they said to Kill the deer, and the activists arent even aware yet.

We responded with Well now they are. These people were too stupid to realise they were talking to the wrong people. (See
the whole comment here)
Proceed with Caution

And in the meantime, this is all evidence enough for us to be extremely wary of exposing ourselves in any way to 1080. It is
clearly a lethal product and by all reports right now, is being spread around quite indiscriminately. Finding it on walking
tracks, in streams and on public seating and anywhere near where humans are likely to be, is simply not good enough.

Families with young children walk these tracks. If you intend hiking in our bush, please avail yourself of data about when
1080 was last spread in the area where you intend walking.

You can obtain this from DOC. We recently heard of two women who were surprised during a picnic by a 1080 drop who
continue to experience illness, they believe, because of that unintended exposure. Clearly they were not aware of any
intentions by DOC to be dropping 1080 where they picnicked that day.

About 1080:
1080 is an alias for Monofluoroacetate, a chemical. Monofluoroacetate was originally developed and
marketed as an insecticide. It functions primarily by interfering with the citrate step in the Krebs cycle [5].
The Krebs cycle is the major and an essential mechanism by which all air breathing creatures utilize food
to produce energy.

It is therefore universally toxic to all animals, essentially every living thing except plants and some micro-
organisms. The degree of toxicity of 1080 is extreme, but varies somewhat among species. It is
categorised by the World Health Organization (WHO) as 1A, their highest rating, extremely toxic [1,2].

* The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies 1080 as Extremely Hazardous, most countries ban it outright.
NZ uses 85% of the worlds supply perhaps the world hasnt figured out what a wonderful thing it really is.
(References 1-5 are at the source)
*Dr Q Whiting-OKeefe (BA Chemistry, Math), MD, FACMI
What I deduct from all of this is that until the NZ government desists from using it, we the public must be very vigilant in
protecting ourselves. That to my mind includes warning others, particularly tourists who are sold our country on the basis of
being clean and green.

The corporations (and our government is one) have a priority (a legal mandate) of profits over people, so they are not going
to put your safety first. We believe it is far safer to err on the side of caution when there are any suspected or known risks.

Educate yourself on 1080 find links at our 1080 page to the many resources available. Search for further articles
exposing the risks of 1080 by searching categories at the left of any page. Note: for some reason, the Facebook sharing
button is not working in the meantime, to share please use the url. extreme care.

For further information on 1080 read here: Ban1080.co.nz/1080-facts

Watch a trailer at this link: TheGrafBoys.org/movies/preview You can purchase the Graf Boys excellent
documentaries on 1080 at this link: TheGrafBoys.org

See the TheGrafBoys Youtube channel and website for more videos.

See also: 1080science.co.nz

The Stock Deaths From 1080 Poison & How DOC Is Hiding Them In The Paper Work

Farmers talk of their losses in this clip from the Graf Boys 'Poisoning Paradise' doco. Deaths
described by those interviews include 6 cows, 13 deer, 250 sheep, 160 sheep, cattle and more.
When farmers are compensated for their losses theyre declared as, in one case, track maintenance and another,
stock food. Included for one farmer was the requirement to sign a confidentiality clause.

Complete dishonesty & whitewash by our authorities. Those mandated with ensuring your safety. Still trust them? The clip
goes on to discuss the risks of the poison entering our food chain.

These are very real risks if you listen to the eye witness evidence.
Possum exports rejected by Japan because theyd seen documentary evidence on 1080 poison drops amongst our animals.
A must watch. Please share. Show it to the nay sayers.

Related: Satanists Escape Plan Involves Killing Natives Of New Zealand

Scientists: Earths Magnetic Fields Carry Biologically Relevant Information That

Connects All Living Systems
December 3 2016 | From: CollectiveEvolution

Science has recently shed light on the fact that what we used to perceive as human aura is
actually real. All of our bodies emit an electromagnetic field, and this fact plays a very important
role far beyond what is commonly known when it comes to understanding our biology, and the
interconnectedness we share with all life.

For example, did you know that the heart emits the largest electromagnetic field of all the bodys major organs?

Related: Scientific Research Shows Your Heart Has An Aura And Intelligence

These fields and the information encoded into them can change based on how we are feeling, what we thinking, and
different emotions we take on. The heart even sends signals to the brain through a system of neutrons that have both short-
term and long-term memory, and these signals can affect our emotional experiences.

The emotional information thats modulated and coded into these fields changes their nature, and these fields can impact
those around us. As Rollin McCraty, Ph.D, and director of research at The HeartMath institute tell us, we are fundamentally
and deeply connected with each other and the planet itself.

Research findings have shown that as we practice heart coherence and radiate love and compassion, our heart
generates a coherent electromagnetic wave into the local field environment that facilitates social coherence,
whether in the home, workplace, classroom or sitting around a table.

As more individuals radiate heart coherence, it builds an energetic field that makes it easier for others to connect
with their heart.

So, theoretically it is possible that enough people building individual and social coherence could actually contribute
to an unfolding global coherence."

The quote above comes from Dr. Deborah Rozman, the President of Quantum Intech. We are living in exciting times when it
comes to science, and although not emphasized and studied in the mainstream as much as wed like, science is
acknowledging that we are all part of a giant web of connections that, not only encompasses life on this planet, but our
entire solar system and what lies beyond it.

Related: The True Cause of Heart Disease: A Conversation with Dr. Aseem Malhotra

So, what exactly is heart coherence? Well, it implies order, structure, and as Dr. Rozman puts it:

An alignment within and amongst systems whether quantum particle, organisms, human beings, social groups,
 planets or galaxies.

This harmonious order signifies a coherent system whose optimal functioning is directly related to the ease and
flow in its processes.

Basically, feelings of love, gratitude, appreciation and other positive emotions not only have an effect on our nervous
system, but they have an affect on those around us, far beyond what we might have previously thought.

Its similar to the studies that have been conducted regarding mass meditation and prayer. As far as their effects on physical
systems, numerous publications have yielded statistically significant results. For a selected list of downloadable peer-
reviewed journal articles reporting studies of this type of phenomena, mostly published in the 21st century, you can
click here.

Another point that illustrates the importance of coherence is the fact that several organizations around the world have
conducted synchronized meditations, prayers, intention experiments, and more. A number of studies have shown that
collective meditations, prayer or focused intention directed toward a certain positive outcome can have measurable effects.

Related: Confessions of a Cardiologist - Treat the Inflammation not the Cholesterol

For example, one study was done during the Israel-Lebanon war in the 1980s. Two Harvard University professors organized
groups of experienced meditators in Jerusalem, Yugoslavia, and the United states with the specific purpose of focusing
attention on the area of conflict at various intervals over a 27-month period.

During the course of the study, the levels of violence in Lebanon decreased between 40 and 80 percent each time a
meditating group was in place. The average number of people killed during the war each day dropped from 12 to three, and
war-related injuries fell by 70 percent. (1)

Another great example is a study that was conducted in 1993 in Washington, D.C., which showed a 25 percent drop in crime
rates when 2,500 meditators meditated during a specific periods of time with that intention.
 Every individuals energy affects the collective field environment. The means each persons emotions and
intentions generate an energy that affects the field. A first step in diffusing societal stress in the global field is for
each of us to take personal responsibility for our own energies.

We can do this by increasing our personal coherence and raising our vibratory rate, which helps us become more
conscious of the thoughts, feelings, and attitudes that we are feeding the field each day.

We have a choice in every moment to take to heart the significance of intentionally managing our energies. This is
the free will or local freedom that can create global cohesion."

Dr. Rozman

The Global Coherence Initiative (GCI)

The GCI in an international cooperative effort to help activate the heart of humanity and facilitate a shift in global
consciousness. Its primary focuses are to invite people to participate by actively adding more heart-coherent love, care, and
compassion into the planetary field.

The second is scientific research on how we are all energetically connected with each other and the planet, and how we can
utilize this interconnectivity, which is very real, to raise our personal vibration to assist in creating a better world.

The hypotheses of the researchers and scientists behind this process are as follows:

The Earths magnetic fields are a carrier of biologically relevant information that connects all living systems

Every person affects this global information field. Large numbers of people creating heart-coherent states of love,
appreciation, care, and compassion can generate a more coherent field environment that benefits others and helps
off-set the current planetary discord and incoherence

There is a feedback loop between human beings and Earths energetic/magnetic systems

Earth has several sources of magnetic fields that affect us all. Two of them are the geomagnetic field that
emanates from the core of the Earth, and the fields that exist between Earth and the ionosphere. These fields
surround the entire planet and act as protective shields blocking out the harmful effects of solar radiation, cosmic
rays, sand, and other forms of space weather. Without these fields, ice as we know it could not exist on Earth. They
are part of the dynamic ecosystem of our planet

Think about the current state of our planet. We are definitely not in coherence, with all of the violence, war, hate, and greed
that still plague our planet, we have a lot of work to do.

We do not yet know how these thoughts, emotions, and feelings are affecting the entire planet, and what type of information
these experiences are encoding into once electromagnetic fields, and how it is interacting with that of the Earths. Things are
changing, however. There is definitely a shift within people who are desiring a better experience here on planet Earth.
Related: New study finds wheat and carbs biggest risk for heart disease, red meat and saturated fat has no direct
effect

These energetic fields are known to scientists, but there are still many unknowns. Solar activity and the rhythms taking place
on Earths magnetic fields have an impact on health and behaviour. This is firmly established in scientific
literature. (source)(source)

Scientific literature also firmly establishes that several physiological rhythms and global collective behaviours are not only
synchronized with solar and geomagnetic activity, but that disruptions in these fields can create adverse effects on human
health and behaviour. (source)(source)(source)

When the Earths magnetic field environment is distributed it can cause sleep problems, mental confusion, usual
lack of energy or a feeling of being on edge or overwhelmed for no apparent reason.

At other times, when the Earths fields are stable and certain measures of solar activity are increased, people
report increased positive feelings and more creativity and inspiration.

This is likely due to a coupling between the human brain, cardiovascular and nervous system with resonating
geomagnetic frequencies."

The Earth and ionosphere generate frequencies that range from 0.01 hertz to 300 hertz, some of which are in the
exact same frequency range as the one happening in our brain, cardiovascular system, and autonomic nervous
system.

This fact is one way to explain how fluctuations in the Earths and Suns magnetic fields can influence us. Changes in these
fields have also been shown to affect our brain waves, heart rhythms, memory, athletics performance, and overall health.
Related: New Scientific Analysis Confirms Saturated Fats Have No Link to Heart Disease

Changes in the Earths fields from extreme solar activity have been linked to some of humanitys greatest creations of art, as
well as some of its most tragic events. (source)

We know how these fields affect us, but what about how we affect these fields? Thats the real question here. GCI scientists
believe that because brain wave and heart rhythm frequencies overlap the Earths field resonance, we are not just receivers
of biologically relevant information, but also feed information into the global field, thus creating a feedback loop with the
Earths magnetic fields.

Research is indicating that human emotions and consciousness encode information into the geomagnetic field
and this encoded information is distributed globally. The Earths magnetic fields act as carrier waves for this
information which influences all living systems and the collective consciousness."

This research, which is still in its infancy, has great ramifications. It will further push along the fact that our attitudes,
emotions, and intentions actually matter, a lot, and that these factors within the realm of non-material science can affect all
life on Earth.

Coherent, cooperative intention could impact global events and improve the quality of life on Earth. Practicing love,
gratitude, appreciation, and bettering ourselves as individuals is one out of many action steps towards changing our planet
for the better.

So What Can You Do?

So, next time you are upset, angry, or frustrated, try observing yourself and how you react. Its great practice to try and lose
your buttons so they cannot be pushed, and work on your personal development.

You have to do whatever you can to feel good, which could include exercise, eating healthy, minimizing electronics time,
spending time with friends, animals, and more.

You could practice being less judgemental, and work on your intentions by figuring out if they are coming from a good
place. You could be more grateful, you could help others, and you can treat others how they want to be treated.

There are a number of tools you could use, like meditation, for example, to assist you with these action steps. Bottom line, if
you are at peace with yourself, and have control over your emotions, you are helping the planet and others around you. If
you are constantly angry, harming others or have negative intentions, you could be doing the exact opposite.

To further your research on this topic, an excellent place to start is the at the Institute of HeartMath. The Institute of
HeartMath is an internationally recognized nonprofit research and education organization dedicated to helping people
reduce stress, self-regulate emotions, and build energy and resilience for healthy, happy lives.

Related Articles:

What Science Is Telling Us About The Hearts Intuitive Intelligence

Heart Intelligence: Connecting With The Intuitive Guidance Of The Heart

Kids Meditate Instead Of Taking ADHD Medications, See Amazing Resuts +
Elementary School Sends Kids To Meditation Instead Of Detention And The Results
Are Astounding
December 2 2016 | From: NaturalBlaze / TrueActivist

Firmly embedded into our culture now, pharmaceutical companies create so-called cures and
treatments for every human condition, and modern psychiatry has become an institution that
works to create lifelong dependencies on medications to help people adapt to the stress of modern
life and to conform to the rigid corporate/consumer culture that has come to be known as life.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has become an industry in and of itself, and it is huge.

Related: Nutrition And Mental Health + ADHD Is A Fabricated Disease, Says Reputed Neurologist

Attention deficit hyperactive disorder is big business. Thats the conclusion of a new report, published by the
market research firm IBISWorld, which showed that ADHD medication sales have grown 8 percent each year since
2010 and will grow another 13 percent this year [2015] to $12.9 billion.

Furthermore, it projects this growth will continue over the next five years at an annualized rate of 6 percent, and
take in $17.5 billion in the year 2020 - making it one of the top psychopharmaceutical categories on the market.

- Source

The pharmaceutical industry profits by changing peoples perceptions of what health is, then training them to believe that
pills offer the most practical and convenient solution.

This applies as much to statin drugs, painkillers and diabetic treatments as it does to psychiatric and psychotropic
medications. The result is a nation of medication dependent people who have no idea to heal themselves naturally, and an
ever-increasing corporate profit stream for pharmaceutical companies.
Related: 4 Facts About ADHD That Teachers & Doctors Never Tell Parents

There is a ton of money being made selling ADHD medications to people of all walks of life, but much of the growth in this
industry is in prescribing these drugs to children, sometimes even to toddlers.

The truth about ADHD is that to many prestigious physicians it is nothing more than a fictitious disorder, something that
describes a varying set of symptoms, contrived by the American Medical Association.

after 50 years of practicing medicine and seeing thousands of patients demonstrating symptoms of ADHD, I
have reached the conclusion there is no such thing as ADHD.

- Dr Richard Saul

Related: The Difference Between My Psychiatrist and My Shaman

Over diagnosis is now commonplace even though some are beginning to acknowledge that the medications often
prescribed for ADHD are chemically identical to speed, or methamphetamine, a Class I illegal street drug.

In the case of Adderall, Dr. Carl Hart has explained that this is in fact the case, and the explosion in recreational use of
these drugs has many agreeing that ADHD medications are the real gateway drug to addiction, not cannabis, as
popular drug war propaganda would have us believe.

But what if there were a way to improve the behavior, mood, and concentration levels of people with symptoms similar to
those described as ADHD? What if this treatment was free and led to many improvements in the patients life, including
increased happiness, confidence and spiritual wellness?
Related: Before His Death, Father Of ADHD Admitted It Was A Fictitious Disease

What if all it took was an improved diet, exercise and training in mental focus to overcome these symptoms?

Meditation is scientifically proven to bring about many health benefits for practically anyone, and is proving to be very
effective for children who have been labelled with ADHD.

The following video records the stories of several children who had been struggling with the common symptoms of ADHD
and instead of taking prescription speed were given three months training in Transcendental Meditation (TM), with
outstanding results.

Its working its improving their lives, its improving their sense of self, its empowering them I really do see it
making a big difference, and I think their futures are going to be so much brighter because of it.

- Linda Handy, Ph.D.

ADHD Kids Before and After

Researchers are finding TM may do more than just relax the children, it may actually decrease disabling aspects
of ADHD."
 - Source

In this video from the David Lynch Foundation, transcendental meditation is used experimentally in Kingsbury Day School in
Washington, DC, a school for children with language-based learning disabilities.

Twice a day the regular school program stops and the children meditate, using the TM method for just ten minutes, with
incredible results, and without the use of pharmaceutical ADHD medications.

ADHD: Medication or Meditation?

Results like these beg the question: do we have time to teach our children well, or are we so wrapped in our day-to-
day lives that wed rather medicate them into conforming so as to conveniently bring them in line with the
standards and expectations of todays stressful corporate-consumer culture? Meditation works and does wonders for
children.

Related: Harvard Research Finds Link Between Fluoridated Water, ADHD & Mental Disorders

Elementary School Sends Kids To Meditation Instead Of Detention And The Results
Are Astounding
Since the program started, not a single student has been suspended.

As a conventional method of punishment, most students are sent to detention, subjected to undesirable after-
school activities, or even suspended when they do something wrong.

Related: June 25 2014 - A Neuroscientist Explains What Happens To Your Brain When You Meditate
Thats how a Baltimore elementary school, Robert W. Coleman, used to do things before they discovered a new, healthier
way to approach discipline.

Partnering with the Holistic Life Foundation, the school now employs the Mindful Moment program to instead teach kids to
wind down, reflect, and breathe in tough situations. When students are misbehaving, they send them to the Mindful Moment
room for individual assistance with emotional self-regulation.

The room is equipped with staff that has the necessary training to help students with anxiety, stress, headaches, and more
issues that can cause them to act up or feel the need to stop by the room on their own time.

For students that are referred there by teachers, the specialists spend 5 minutes in targeted discussion with them and then
15 minutes doing appropriate mindful exercises to help them; this can range from breathing exercises to simple yoga.

In this troubled neighborhood, the mindful moments help them to not only decompress but to also overcome the trauma they
might have faced thats causing them to act out. Ali Smith, one of the masterminds behind the program, said;

They see people get murdered, they see violence, they see all types of things and it is all kind of building up inside
them never actually had a way to kind of be aware of it and release it, so we are kind of giving them the tools to be
aware of it and let it go.

Whats amazing about the program is that its not only helping the students at school but in their home life as well. Many of
the children are bringing back what theyre learning by telling their own stressed-out parents to breathe as a way to alleviate
their tension.

Since the Mindful Moment rooms inception last year, not a single student has been suspended, proving that the program
really works to motivate students to pause before making a bad decision.

Rather than stewing in their own anger or stress in detention, the students are gently pushed to deal with the underlying
cause of their behavior and instead turn it into something positive.

Related: Meditation Literally Rebuilds Your Brain

In addition to the special room for students in need of assistance, the school also plays a Mindful Moment audio file over the
loudspeaker every morning and afternoon to start their day off right and send them off calmly. The 15-minute exercise in
breathing, meditation, and focus helps the children to recalibrate.

Studies show that meditation can relieve pain, enhance creativity, relieve stress and boost immune systems. Regular
practice can increase left frontal activity in the brain, which is associated with positive mood, and decrease activity in the
amygdala, the area related to stress and anxiety.

This practice at the Baltimore elementary school, and other schools employing the program, is groundbreaking and proving
to be very effective.

More schools should consider an alternative approach similar to this to promote positivity rather than strict
punishment, especially in areas that are high in crime.

Neuroscientist Shows What Fasting Does To Your Brain & Why Big Pharma Wont
Study It
November 29 2016 | From: CollectiveEvolution

Below is a TEDx talk given by Mark Mattson, the current Chief of the Laboratory of Neuroscience at
the National Institute on Aging.
He is also a professor of Neuroscience at The Johns Hopkins University, and one of the foremost researchers in
the area of cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying multiple neurodegenerative disorders, like Parkinsons
and Alzheimers disease.

Related: Outrage as pharma-corrupted Google censors Alzheimer's prevention summit, claiming disease is not
'preventable'

I chose to include Big Pharma in the title because thats exactly what it is. There have been countless examples of the
manipulation of published research at the hands of pharmaceutical companies in recent years.

This is why Harvard Professor of Medicine Arnold Symour Relman told the world that the medical profession has been
bought by the pharmaceutical industry.

Its why Dr. Richard Horton, Editor in Chief of The Lancet, recently stated that much of the sceintific literature published
today is simply untrue.
Related: Most Scientific Research Of Western Medicine Untrustable & Fraudulent, Say Insiders And Experts

Its why Dr. Marcia Angell, former Editor in Chief of The New England Journal of Medicine, said that the:

Pharmaceutical industry likes to depict itself as a research-based industry, as the source of innovative drugs.
Nothing could be further from the truth.

And its why John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine, published an article titled Why
Most Published Research Findings Are False which subsequently became the most widely accessed article in the history of
the Public Library of Science (PLoS).

I also chose to mention Big Pharma because of Dr. Mattsons comments towards the end of the video.

Why is it that the normal diet is three meals a day plus snacks? It isnt that its the healthiest eating pattern, now
thats my opinion but I think there is a lot of evidence to support that. There are a lot of pressures to have that
eating pattern, theres a lot of money involved.

The food industry - are they going to make money from skipping breakfast like I did today? No, theyre going to
lose money. If people fast, the food industry loses money.

What about the pharmaceutical industries? What if people do some intermittent fasting, exercise periodically and
are very healthy, is the pharmaceutical industry going to make any money on healthy people?
Main Points Of The Lecture Above & The Science To Go With It

Mark and his team have published several papers that discuss how fasting twice a week could significantly lower the risk of
developing both Parkinsons and Alzheimers disease.

Dietary changes have long been known to have an effect on the brain. Children who suffer from epileptic seizures
have fewer of them when placed on caloric restriction or fasts.

It is believed that fasting helps kick-start protective measures that help counteract the overexcited signals that
epileptic brains often exhibit. (Some children with epilepsy have also benefited from a specific high-fat, low-
carbohydrate diet.)

Normal brains, when overfed, can experience another kind of uncontrolled excitation, impairing the brains function,
Mattson and another researcher reported in January in the journal Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

- Source

Basically, when you take a look at caloric restriction studies, many of them show a prolonged lifespan as well as an
increased ability to fight chronic disease.

Calorie restriction (CR) extends life span and retards age-related chronic diseases in a variety of species,
including rats, mice, fish, flies, worms, and yeast. The mechanism or mechanisms through which this occurs are
unclear.

The quote above is from a review of the literature that is more than 10 years old. The work presented here is now showing
some of these mechanisms that were previously unclear.

Fasting does good things for the brain, and this is evident by all of the beneficial neurochemical changes that happen in the
brain when we fast. It also improves cognitive function, increases neurotrophic factors, increases stress resistance, and
reduces inflammation.
Related: Eating Fat, Fighting Alzheimers

Fasting is a challenge to your brain, and your brain responds to that challenge by adapting stress response pathways which
help your brain cope with stress and risk for disease.

The same changes that occur in the brain during fasting mimic the changes that occur with regular exercise. They both
increase the production of protein in the brain (neurotrophic factors), which in turn promotes the growth of neurons, the
connection between neurons, and the strength of synapses.

Challenges to your brain, whether its intermittent fasting [or] vigorous exercise. . . is cognitive challenges.

When this happens neuro-circuits are activated, levels of neurotrophic factors increase, that promotes the growth
of neurons [and] the formation and strengthening of synapses . . .

Fasting can also stimulate the production of new nerve cells from stem cells in the hippocampus. He also mentions ketones
(an energy source for neurons), and how fasting stimulates the production of ketones and that it may also increase the
number of mitochondria in neurons.

Fasting also increases the number of mitochondria in nerve cells; this comes as a result of the neurons adapting to the
stress of fasting (by producing more mitochondria).

By increasing the number of mitochondria in the neurons, the ability for nerons to form and maintain the connections
between each other also increases, thereby improving learning and memory ability.

Intermittent fasting enhances the ability of nerve cells to repair DNA.

He also goes into the evolutionary aspect of this theory how our ancestors adapted and were built for going long periods of
time without food.

A study published in the June 5 issue of Cell Stem Cell by researchers from the University of Southern California showed
that cycles of prolonged fasting protect against immune system damage and, moreover, induce immune system
regeneration.

They concluded that fasting shifts stem cells from a dormant state to a state of self-renewal. It triggers stem cell based
regeneration of an organ or system (Source).

Related: Doctor Robert Scott Bell Explains The History Of Modern Medicine + Why Medical Researcher Calls
Doctors 'The Most Brainwashed People On The Planet'

Human clinical trials were conducted using patients who were receiving chemotherapy. For long periods of time, patients did
not eat, which significantly lowered their white blood cell counts. In mice, fasting cycles flipped a regenerative switch,
changing the signalling pathways for hematopoietic stem cells, which are responsible for the generation of blood and
immune systems.

This means that fasting kills off old and damaged immune cells, and when the body rebounds it uses stem cells to create
brand new, completely healthy cells.

We could not predict that prolonged fasting would have such a remarkable effect in promoting stem cell-based
regeneration of the heatopoietic system . . .

When you starve, the system tries to save energy, and one of the things it can do to save energy is to recycle a lot
of the immune cells that are not needed, especially those that may be damaged.

What we started noticing in both our human work and animal work is that the white blood cell count goes down
with prolonged fasting. Then when you re-feed, the blood cells come back.

- Valter Longo, corresponding author - Source

A scientific review of multiple scientific studies regarding fasting was published in The American Journal of Clinical
Nutrition in 2007. It examined a multitude of both human and animal studies and determined that fasting is an effective way
to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer. It also showed significant potential in treating diabetes (Source).

Before You Fast

Before you fast, make sure you do your research. Personally, Ive been fasting for years, so it is something that comes
easy for me.

One recommended way of doing it - which was tested by the BBCs Michael Mosley in order to reverse his diabetes, high
cholesterol, and other problems that were associated with his obesity - is what is known as the 5:2 Diet.

On the 5:2 plan, you cut your food down to one-fourth of your normal daily calories on fasting days (about 600 calories for
men and about 500 for women), while consuming plenty of water and tea. On the other five days of the week, you can eat
normally.

Related: 7 Conditions Masquerading As Dementia

Another way to do it, as mentioned above, is to restrict your food intake between the hours of 11am and 7pm daily, while not
eating during the hours outside of that time.

Bottom line, how you think about youre diet is, in my opinion, one of the most, if not the most important part of staying
healthy. How you think about what you are putting in your body is important, and I believe this will eventually be firmly
established in the untainted, unbiased, uninfluenced medical literature of the future.

Below is a video of Dr. Joseph Mercola explaining the benefits of intermittent fasting. Here is a great article by him that
explains how he believes intermittent fasting can help you live a healthier life.

Dr. Mercola: The Benefits of Intermittent Fasting

Related: Saffron Flowers Versus Aricept, Leading Alzheimers Drug

Steps To Reverse Cavities And Heal Tooth Decay Naturally + Root Canals Are
Extremely Toxic
November 28 2016 | From: Sott / DrMercola
In Western medicine, the majority of us have come to accept that, when we are told we have a
cavity, there is no other option except to let it continue to decay or get your tooth drilled out and
filled with synthetic material.

But if you are among the many who have grown skeptic of the single story our medical system offers, you will be
happy to find that, according to a study published in the British Medical Journal, you may be able to reverse
cavities and tooth decay with your diet.

Related: Root Canals May Now Be Linked With Chronic Diseases

The study looked at 62 children with cavities, dividing them into three different diet groups. Group 1, who ate a diet high in
grains and phytic acid, had an increase in cavities. Group 2, who consumed a normal diet supplemented with vitamin D,
developed fewer cavities and saw improvements in the ones they had, and Group 3, who followed a grain-free diet with
nutrient-rich foods like vegetables, fruits, meat, milk, and who also took vitamin D, saw the greatest improvements, with
nearly all cavities healed.

This may be good news for not just holistic health enthusiasts, but anyone who likes to save their money!

To better understand how you can take advantage of these findings, the following points serve to show both the causes of
tooth decay as well as ways you may be able to prevent and reverse cavities and tooth decay.
What Causes Tooth Decay? According to the ADA (American Dental Association), pioneered by well-respected dentist
Weston A. Price in the early 1900s, the cause of tooth decay is as follows:

Tooth decay occurs when foods containing carbohydrates (sugars and starches) such as milk, pop, raisins, cakes
or candy are frequently left on the teeth. Bacteria that live in the mouth thrive on these foods, producing acids as a
result. The stickiness of the plaque keeps these acids in contact with your teeth and after many such attacks, the
enamel can break down and a cavity forms."

However, Dr. Edward Mellanby, Dr. Weston Price, and Dr. Ramiel Nagel note that there are actually four main things which
contribute to tooth decay:

1. A mineral deficiency in the diet, including calcium, magnesium, and phosphorous

2. A lack of fat soluble vitamins including A, E, K, and especially D

3. A diet heavy in phytic acid

4. A diet heavy in processed sugar

So How Can You Reverse Cavities Naturally?Of course it's important to brush and floss daily, but there are additional ways
you can reverse your cavities naturally whilst also maximizing your oral health which do not include fluoride.

1. Eliminate Added Sugars

It's become common knowledge that sugar is among the worst things for your health, and especially for anyone who wants
healthy teeth free of cavities.

Related: The Real Source of Cavities and Gum Disease

Sugar contributes to cavities by feeding oral bacteria that hinders a healthy flow of dental fluid. It is also extremely acidic,
and can decalcify or demineralize the structural content of your teeth, resulting in dental decay.
 Some of the biggest culprits are soda, candy, cookies, and other baked goods with sugar.

When you want to sweeten something, opt for raw money or maple syrup.

When you want juice, do so only on occasion.

Steer clear of artificial sweeteners as well!

2. Get Rid Of Phytic Acid

Phytate is a mineral blocker and enzyme inhibitor that can cause a variety of serious health problems. It is present in grains,
nuts, seeds, and beans. Ancient food preparation techniques such as sprouting and sourdough fermentation work to kill off
the phytic acid, but these practices have become sparse, and so many of the foods we love that are normally considered
healthy are ridden with a detrimental ingredient.

Related: Dentists Profit From Unnecessary Wisdom Teeth Removal Surgery

Phytic acid binds to minerals that are pertinent for oral health, like calcium, magnesium, iron, and zinc, making them
unavailable for absorption. Research supports this theory, concluding that phytic acid significantly impairs the absorption of
these essential minerals.

3. Eat Your Dairy Raw, And Consume Foods Rich In Nutrients

Raw dairy is one of the best ways to keep your teeth cavity-free, as it's filled with essential vitamins and minerals - like
calcium, vitamin K2, vitamin D2, magnesium, phosphorus, and fat-soluble vitamins - that contribute to healthy dental fluid
flow, teeth strength, and oral wellness.
Related: Curing Cavities Naturally

Great options for consuming raw dairy are goat milk kefir, raw cheeses, and organic grass-fed butter.

Also beneficial for your diet are:

Green, leafy vegetables

Fruit

Healthy fats like coconut oil, avocado, olives, and fish

Fermented grains (in moderation)

Sprouted nuts, seeds, and beans

4. Opt For Mineralizing Toothpaste

Fluoride-free toothpaste is worth the cost. But you can also make your own, too. Try out this recipe, complete with coconut
oil, aluminum-free baking soda, essential oils, and minerals.

5. Practice Oil Pulling

It's been getting a lot of attention in the media and amongst holistic health circles in recent years, but oil pulling has been
used for centuries by Ayurvedic medicine. It's a great oral detoxification tool, and is simple, too.
All you have to do is scoop up a tablespoon of oil and swish it in your mouth for exactly 20 minutes. It's been used to fight a
variety of things, from fighting against gingivitis and headaches to systemic diseases such as diabetes.

Related: Oil Pulling Benefits & Information

Root Canals Are Extremely Toxic

You can learn more about dangers and solutions relating to root canals here. (You will see a sales pitch - but it is
worth taking a look because the information is very good whilst concise.

Cures, Health & Wellbeing

Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

 Part Four: Click here

Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/health-wellbeing.shtml

Is Psychiatry Bullshit? + Fourteen Lies That Our Psychiatry Professors Taught Us In

Medical School
November 26 2016 | From: Sott / GlobalResearch

Some Psychiatrists View The Chemical-Imbalance Theory As A Well-Meaning Lie.

In the current issue of the journal Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, Australian dissident psychiatrist
Niall McLaren titles his article, "Psychiatry as Bullshit" and makes a case for just that.

Related: The Myth Of Mental Illness: Psychiatry Is A Fraud And It Is All About Control + Opposition Defiant
Disorder - Non-Conformity And Anti-Authoritarianism Now Considered An Illness

The great controversies in psychiatry are no longer about its chemical-imbalance theory of mental illness or its DSM
diagnostic system, both of which have now been declared invalid even by the pillars of the psychiatry
establishment.

In 2011, Ronald Pies, editor-in-chief emeritus of the Psychiatric Times, stated;

In truth, the 'chemical imbalance' notion was always a kind of urban legend - never a theory seriously propounded
by well-informed psychiatrists."

And in 2013, Thomas Insel, then director of the National Institute of Mental Health, offered a harsh rebuke of the
DSM, announcing that because the DSM diagnostic system lacks validity, the: "NIMH will be re-orienting its
research away from DSM categories."

So, the great controversy today has now become just how psychiatry can be most fairly characterized given its record of
being proven wrong about virtually all of its assertions, most notably its classifications of behaviors, theories of "mental
illness" and treatment effectiveness/adverse effects.

Among critics, one of the gentlest characterizations of psychiatry is a "false narrative," the phrase used by investigative
reporter Robert Whitaker (who won the 2010 Investigative Reporters and Editors Book Award for Anatomy of an Epidemic)
to describe the story told by the psychiatrists' guild American Psychiatric Association.

In "Psychiatry as Bullshit," McLaren begins by considering several different categories of "nonscience with scientific
pretensions," such as "pseudoscience" and "scientific fraud."

"Pseudoscience" is commonly defined as a collection of beliefs and practices promulgated as scientific but in reality
mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method. The NIMH director ultimately rejected the DSM because of its
lack of validity, which is crucial to the scientific method.

In the DSM, psychiatric illnesses are created by an APA committee, 69 percent of whom have financial ties to Big
Pharma.

The criteria for DSM illness are not objective biological ones but non-scientific subjective ones (which is why homosexuality
was a DSM mental illness until the early 1970s).

Besides lack of scientific validity, the DSM lacks scientific reliability, as clinicians routinely disagree on diagnoses because
patients act differently in different circumstances and because of the subjective nature of the criteria.

"Fraud" is a misrepresentation, a deception intended for personal gain, and implies an intention to deceive others
of the truth - or "lying." Drug companies, including those that manufacture psychiatric drugs, have been convicted
of fraud, as have high-profile psychiatrists (as well as other doctors).

Human rights activist and attorney Jim Gottstein offers an argument as to why the APA is a "fraudulent enterprise";
however, the APA has not been legally convicted of fraud.
To best characterize psychiatry, McLaren considers the category of "bullshit," invoking philosopher Harry Frankfurt's 1986
journal article "On Bullshit" (which became a New York Times bestselling book in 2005).

Defining Bullshit

What is the essence of bullshit? For Frankfurt, "This lack of connection to a concern with truth - this indifference to how
things really are - that I regard as of the essence of bullshit."

Frankfurt devotes a good deal of On Bullshit to differentiating between a liar and a bullshitter. Both the liar and the
bullshitter misrepresent themselves, representing themselves as attempting to be honest and truthful. But there is a
difference between the liar and the bullshitter.

The liar knows the truth, and the liar's goal is to conceal it.

The goal of bullshitters is not necessarily to lie about the truth but to persuade their audience of a specific
impression so as to advance their agenda. So, bullshitters are committed to neither truths nor untruths,
uncommitted to neither facts nor fiction. It's actually not in bullshitters' interest to know what is true and what is
false, as that knowledge can hinder their capacity to bullshit.

Frankfurt tells us that liar the hides that he or she is "attempting to lead us away from a correct apprehension of reality." In
contrast, the bullshitter hides that "the truth-values of his statements are of no central interest to him."

Are Psychiatrists Bullshitters?

Recall establishment psychiatrist Pies' assertion:

 In truth, the 'chemical imbalance' notion was always a kind of urban legend - never a theory seriously propounded
by well-informed psychiatrists."

What Pies omits is the reality that the vast majority of psychiatrists have been promulgating this theory. Were they
liars or simply not well-informed? And if not well-informed, were they purposely not well-informed?

If one wants to bullshit oneself and the general public that psychiatry is a genuinely scientific medical specialty, there's a
great incentive to be unconcerned with the truth or falseness of the chemical imbalance theory of depression.

Bullshitters immediately recognize how powerful this chemical imbalance notion is in gaining prestige for their profession
and themselves as well as making their job both more lucrative and easier, increasing patient volume by turning virtually all
patient visits into quick prescribing ones.

Prior to the chemical imbalance bullshit campaign, most Americans were reluctant to take antidepressants - or to
give them to their children.

Related: Big Pharma Caught Manipulating Antidepressant Drug Trials Putting Teenagers in Grave Danger

But the idea that depression is caused by a chemical imbalance that can be corrected with Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft and
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants sounded like taking insulin for diabetes.

Correcting a chemical imbalance seemed like a reasonable thing to do, and so the use of SSRI antidepressants
skyrocketed.

In 2012, National Public Radio correspondent Alix Spiegel began her piece about the disproven chemical imbalance theory
with the following personal story about being prescribed Prozac when she was a depressed teenager:

My parents took me to a psychiatrist at Johns Hopkins Hospital. She did an evaluation and then told me this story:
"The problem with you," she explained, "is that you have a chemical imbalance. It's biological, just like diabetes,
but it's in your brain.

This chemical in your brain called serotonin is too, too low. There's not enough of it, and that's what's causing the
 chemical imbalance. We need to give you medication to correct that." Then she handed my mother a prescription
for Prozac. "

Related: 7 Facts About Depression That Will Blow You Away

When Spiegel discovered that the chemical imbalance theory was untrue, she sought to discover why this truth had been
covered up, and so she interviewed researchers who knew the truth.

Alan Frazer, professor of pharmacology and psychiatry and chairman of the pharmacology department at the University of
Texas Health Sciences Center, told Spiegel that by framing depression as a deficiency - something that needed to be
returned to normal - patients felt more comfortable taking antidepressants.

Frazer stated;

If there was this biological reason for them being depressed, some deficiency that the drug was correcting, then
taking a drug was OK."

For Frazer, the story that depressed people have a chemical imbalance enabled many people to come out of the closet
about being depressed.

Frazer's rationale reminds us of Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky's book Manufacturing Consent, the title deriving from
presidential adviser and journalist Walter Lippmann's phrase "the manufacture of consent" - a necessity for Lippmann, who
believed that the general public is incompetent in discerning what's truly best for them, and so their opinion must be molded
by a benevolent elite who does know what's best for them.
There are some psychiatrists who view the chemical imbalance theory as a well-meaning lie by a benevolent elite to
ensure resistant patients do what is best for them, but my experience is that there are actually extremely few such "well-
meaning liars." Most simply don't know the truth because they have put little effort in discerning it.

I believe McLaren is correct in concluding that the vast majority of psychiatrists are bullshitters, uncommitted to either facts
or fiction. Most psychiatrists would certainly have been happy if the chemical-imbalance theory was true but obviously have
not needed it to be true in order to promulgate it.

For truth seekers, the falseness of the chemical imbalance theory has been easily available, but most
psychiatrists have not been truth seekers.

It is not in the bullshitters' interest to know what is true and what is false, as that knowledge of what is a fact and what is
fiction hinders the capacity to use any and all powerful persuasion. Simply put, a commitment to the truth hinders the
capacity to bullshit.

About the Author

Bruce E. Levine is a practicing clinical psychologist. His latest book is Get Up, Stand Up: Uniting Populists, Energizing the
Defeated, and Battling the Corporate Elite.

Psychotropic Drugs, Are They Safe?

Fourteen Lies That Our Psychiatry Professors Taught Us In Medical School.

Myth # 1:

The FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) tests all new psychiatric drugs

False. Actually the FDA only reviews studies that were designed, administered, secretly performed and paid for by the
multinational profit-driven drug companies.

The studies are frequently farmed out by the pharmaceutical companies by well-paid research firms, in whose interest it is
to find positive results for their corporate employers. Unsurprisingly, such research policies virtually guarantee fraudulent
results.

Myth # 2:

FDA approval means that a psychotropic drug is effective long-term

False. Actually, FDA approval doesnt even mean that psychiatric drugs have been proven to be safe either short-
term or long-term! The notion that FDA approval means that a psych drug has been proven to be effective is also a false
one, for most such drugs are never tested prior to marketing for longer than a few months (and most psych patients
take their drugs for years).

The pharmaceutical industry pays many psychiatric researchers often academic psychiatrists (with east access to
compliant, chronic, already drugged-up patients) who have financial or professional conflicts of interest some of them
even sitting on FDA advisory committees who attempt to fast track psych drugs through the approval process.
For each new drug application, the FDA only receives 1 or 2 of the best studies (out of many) that purport to show short-
term effectiveness. The negative studies are shelved and not revealed to the FDA. In the case of the SSRI drugs, animal
lab studies typically lasted only hours, days or weeks and the human clinical studies only lasted, on average, 4- 6 weeks,
far too short to draw any valid conclusions about long-term effectiveness or safety!

Hence the FDA, prescribing physicians and patient-victims should not have been surprised by the resulting
epidemic of SSRI drug-induced adverse reactions that are silently plaguing the people.

Indeed, many SSRI trials have shown that those drugs are barely more effective than placebo (albeit statistically
significant!) with unaffordable economic costs and serious health risks, some of which are life-threatening and known to be
capable of causing brain damage.

Myth # 3:

FDA approval means that a psychotropic drug is safe long-term

False. Actually, the SSRIs and the anti-psychotic drugs are usually tested in human trials for only a couple of months
before being granted marketing approval by the FDA. And the drug companies are only required to report 1 or 2 studies
(even if many other studies on the same drug showed negative, even disastrous, results).

Drug companies obviously prefer that the black box and fine print warnings associated with their drugs are ignored by both
consumers and prescribers. One only has to note how small the print is on the commercials.
Related: Key Factors To Overcoming Depression Without Drugs

In our fast-paced shop-until-you-drop consumer society, we super-busy prescribing physicians and physician
assistants have never been fully aware of the multitude of dangerous, potentially fatal adverse psych drug effects
that include addiction, mania, psychosis, suicidality, worsening depression, worsening anxiety, insomnia,
akathisia, brain damage, dementia, homicidality, violence, etc, etc.

But when was the last time anybody heard the FDA or Big Pharma apologize for the damage they did in the past?

And when was the last time there were significant punishments (other than writs slaps and chump change multimillion
dollar fines) or prison time for the CEOs of the guilty multibillion dollar drug companies?

Myth # 4:

Mental illnesses are caused by brain chemistry imbalances

False. In actuality, brain chemical/neurotransmitter imbalances have never been proven to exist (except for cases of
neurotransmitter depletions caused by psych drugs) despite vigorous examinations of lab animal or autopsied human
brains and brain slices by neuroscientist s who were employed by well-funded drug companies.

Knowing that there are over 100 known neurotransmitter systems in the human brain, proposing a theoretical chemical
imbalance is laughable and flies in the face of science.
Related: Low-Serotonin Depression Theory Challenged

Not only that, but if there was an imbalance between any two of the 100 potential systems (impossible to prove), a drug
that has never been tested on more than a handful of them could never be expected to re-balance it!

Such simplistic theories have been perpetrated by Big Pharma upon a gullible public and a gullible psychiatric
industry because corporations that want to sell the public on their unnecessary products know that they have to
resort to 20 second sound bite-type propaganda to convince patients and prescribing practitioners why they
should be taking or prescribing synthetic, brain-altering drugs that havent been adequately tested.

Myth # 5:

Antidepressant drugs work like insulin for diabetics

False. This laughingly simplistic and very anti-scientific explanation for the use of dangerous and addictive synthetic
drugs is patently absurd and physicians and patients who believe it should be ashamed of themselves for falling for it.

There is such a thing as an insulin deficiency (but only in type 1 diabetes) but there is no such thing as a Prozac
deficiency.

SSRIs (so-called Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors an intentional mis-representation because those drugs
are NOT selective!) do not raise total brain serotonin.

Rather, SSRIs actually deplete serotonin long-term while only goosing serotonin release at the synapse level while at the
same time interfere with the storage, reuse and re-cycling of serotonin (by its serotonin reuptake inhibition function).
(Parenthetically, the distorted illogic of the insulin/diabetes comparison above could legitimately be made in the case of
the amino acid brain nutrient tryptophan, which is the precursor molecule of the important natural neurotransmitter
serotonin.

If a serotonin deficiency or imbalance could be proven, the only logical treatment approach would be to supplement the
diet with the serotonin precursor tryptophan rather than inflict upon the brain a brain-altering synthetic chemical that
actually depletes serotonin long-term!

Myth # 6:

SSRI discontinuation syndromes are different than withdrawal syndromes

False. The SSRI antidepressant drugs are indeed dependency-inducing/addictive and the neurological and psychological
symptoms that occur when these drugs are stopped or tapered down are not relapses into a previous mental disorder -
as has been commonly asserted - but are actually new drug withdrawal symptoms that are different from those that
prompted the original diagnosis

The term discontinuation syndrome is part of a cunningly-designed conspiracy that was plotted in secret by
members of the psychopharmaceutical industryin order to deceive physicians into thinking that these drugs are
not addictive.
Related: Dr. Kelly Brogan's Takedown Of Big Pharma's SSRI Anti-Depressant Drug Lies Hits Bestseller Lists

The deception has been shamelessly promoted to distract attention from the proven fact that most psych drugs are
dependency-inducing and are therefore likely to cause discontinuation/withdrawal symptoms when they are stopped.

The drug industry knows that most people do not want to swallow dependency-inducing drugs that are likely to cause
painful, even lethal withdrawal symptoms when they cut down the dose of the drug.

Myth # 7:

Ritalin is safe for children (or adults)

False. In actuality, methylphenidate (= Ritalin, Concerta, Daytrana, Metadate and Methylin; aka kiddie cocaine), a
dopamine reuptake inhibitor drug, works exactly like cocaine on dopamine synapses, except that orally-dosed
methylphenidate reaches the brain more slowly than snortable or smoked cocaine does.
Related: Nutrition And Mental Health + ADHD Is A Fabricated Disease, Says Reputed Neurologist

Therefore the oral form has less of an orgasmic high than cocaine.

Cocaine addicts actually prefer Ritalin if they can get it in a relatively pure powder form.

When snorted, the synthetic Ritalin (as opposed to the naturally-occurring, and therefore more easily metabolically-
degraded cocaine) has the same onset of action but, predictably, has a longer lasting high and is thus preferred among
addicted individuals.

The molecular structures of Ritalin and cocaine both have amphetamine base structures with ring-shaped side
chains which, when examined side by side, are remarkably similar. The dopamine synaptic organelles in the brain
(and heart, blood vessels, lungs and guts) are unlikely to sense any difference between the two drugs.

Myth # 8:

Psychoactive drugs are totally safe for humans

False. See Myth # 3 above. Actually all five classes of psychotropic drugs have, with long-term use, been found to be
neurotoxic (ie, known to destroy or otherwise alter the physiology, chemistry, anatomy and viability of vital energy-
producing mitochondria in every brain cell and nerve). They are therefore all capable of contributing to dementia when
used long-term.
Related: The Shocking Truth About Antidepressant Drug Studies + Peter Breggin MD: How Do Psychiatric Drugs
Really Work?

Any synthetic chemical that is capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier into the brain can alter and disable the brain.
Synthetic chemical drugs are NOT capable of healing brain dysfunction, curing malnutrition or reversing brain damage.

Rather than curing anything, psychiatric drugs are only capable of masking symptoms while the abnormal emotional,
neurological or malnutritional processes that mimic mental illnesses continue unabated.

Myth # 9:

Mental illnesses have no known cause

False. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM, published by the American Psychiatric Association, is pejoratively
called the psychiatric bible and billing book for psychiatrists.

Despite its name, it actually has no statistics in it, and, of the 374 psychiatric diagnoses in the DSM-IV (there is
now a 5th edition) there seem to be only two that emphasize known root causes.

Those two diagnoses are Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Acute Stress Disorder. The DSM-V has been roundly
condemned as being just another book that laughingly pathologizes a few more normal human emotions and behaviors.

In my decade of work as an independent holistic mental health care practitioner, I was virtually always able to detect many
of the multiple root causes and contributing factors that easily explained the signs, symptoms and behaviors that had
resulted in a perplexing number of false diagnoses of mental illness of unknown origin.

Many of my patients had been made worse by being hastily diagnosed, hastily drugged, bullied, demeaned, malnourished,
incarcerated, electroshocked (often against their wills and/or without fully informed consent).

My patients had been frequently rendered unemployable or even permanently disabled as a result all because
temporary, potentially reversible, and therefore emotional stressors had not been recognized at the onset.
Because of the reliance on drugs, many of my patients had been made incurable by not having been referred to
compassionate practitioners who practiced high quality, non-drug-based, potentially curable psychotherapy.

The root causes of my patients understandable emotional distress were typically multiple, although sometimes a
single trauma, such as a rape, violent assault or a psychological trauma in the military would cause an otherwise
normally-developing individual to decompensate.

But the vast majority of my patients had experienced easily identifiable chronic sexual, physical, psychological, emotional
and/or spiritual traumas as root causes often accompanied by hopelessness, sleep deprivation, serious emotional or
physical neglect and brain nutrient deficiencies as well.

The only way that I could obtain this critically important information was through the use of thorough, compassionate (and,
unfortunately, time-consuming) investigation into the patients complete history, starting with prenatal, maternal, infant and
childhood exposures to toxins (including vaccines) and continuing into the vitally important adolescent medical history (all
periods when the patients brain was rapidly developing).
My clinical experience proved to me that if enough high quality time was spent with the patient and if enough hard work
was exerted looking for root causes, the patients predicament could usually be clarified and the erroneous past labels (of
mental illnesses of unknown origin) could be thrown out.

Such efforts were often tremendously therapeutic for my patients, who up to that time had been made to feel guilty,
ashamed or hopeless by previous therapists.

In my experience, most mental ill health syndromes represented identifiable, albeit serious emotional de-compensation due
to temporarily overwhelming crisis situations linked to traumatic, frightening, torturous, neglectful and soul-destroying life
experiences.

My practice consisted mostly of patients who knew for certain that they were being sickened by months or years
of swallowing one or more brain-altering, addictive prescription drugs that they couldnt get off of by themselves.

I discovered that many of them could have been cured early on in their lives if they only had access and could afford
compassionate psychoeducational psychotherapy, proper brain nutrition and help with addressing issues of deprivation,
parental neglect/abuse, poverty and other destructive psychosocial situations.
Related: Officials Declare Eating Healthy A Mental Disorder

I came to the sobering realization that many of my patients could have been cured years earlier if it hadnt been for the
disabling effects of psychiatric drug regimens, isolation, loneliness, punitive incarcerations, solitary confinement,
discrimination, malnutrition, and/or electroshock.

The neurotoxic and brain-disabling drugs, vaccines and frankenfoods that most of my patients had been given early on had
started them on the road to chronicity and disability.

Myth # 10:

Psychotropic drugs have nothing to do with the huge increase in disabled and unemployable American
psychiatric patients

False. See Myths # 2 and # 3 above. In actuality recent studies have shown that the major cause of permanent disability in
the mentally ill is the long-term, high dosage and/or use of multiple neurotoxic psych drugs any combination of which,
as noted above, has never been adequately tested for safety even in animal labs.
Related: Neuroscientist Shows What Fasting Does To Your Brain & Why Big Pharma Wont Study It

Many commonly-prescribed drugs are fully capable of causing brain-damage long-term, especially the anti-psychotics (aka,
major tranquilizers) like Thorazine, Haldol, Prolixin, Clozapine, Abilify, Clozapine, Fanapt, Geodon, Invega, Risperdal,
Saphris, Seroquel and Zyprexa, all of which can cause brain shrinkage that is commonly seen on the MRI scans of anti-
psychotic drug-treated, so-called schizophrenics commonly pointed out as proof that schizophrenia is an anatomic brain
disorder that causes the brain to shrink! (Incidentally, patients who had been on antipsychotic drugs for whatever reason
have been known to experience withdrawal hallucinations and acute psychotic symptoms even if they had never
experienced such symptoms previously.)

Of course, highly addictive minor tranquilizers like the benzodiazepines (Valium, Ativan, Klonopin, Librium, Tranxene,
Xanax) can cause the same withdrawal syndromes. They are all dangerous and very difficult to withdraw from (withdrawal
results in difficult-to-treat rebound insomnia, panic attacks, and seriously increased anxiety), and, when used long-term,
they can all cause memory loss/dementia, the loss of IQ points and the high likelihood of being mis-diagnosed as
Alzheimers disease (of unknown etiology).

Myth # 11:

So-called bipolar disorder can mysteriously emerge in patients who have been taking stimulating
antidepressants like the SSRIs

False. In actuality, crazy-making behaviors like mania, agitation and aggression are commonly caused by the SSRIs. That
list includes a syndrome called akathisia, a severe, sometimes suicide-inducing internal restlessness like having restless
legs syndrome over ones entire body and brain.

Akathisia was once understood to only occur as a long-term adverse effect of antipsychotic drugs (See Myth # 10). So it
was a shock to many psychiatrists (after Prozac came to market in 1987) to have to admit that SSRIs could also cause that
deadly problem.
Related: Antidepressants Arent Needed Most Of The Time

It has long been my considered opinion that SSRIs should more accurately be called agitation-inducing drugs rather than
anti-depressant drugs.

The important point to make is that SSRI-induced psychosis, mania, agitation, aggression and akathisia is NOT bipolar
disorder nor is it schizophrenia!

Myth # 12:

Antidepressant drugs can prevent suicides

False. In actuality, there is no psychiatric drug that is FDA-approved for the treatment of suicidality because these drugs,
especially the so-called antidepressants, actually INCREASE the incidence of suicidal thinking, suicide attempts and
completed suicides.
Related: The Roots Of Mental Health - Maybe Theyre Not In Our Heads + Rising Rates Of Suicide: Are Pills The
Problem?

Drug companies have spent billions of dollars futilely trying to prove the effectiveness of various psychiatric drugs in suicide
prevention.

Even the most corrupted drug company trials have failed! Indeed what has been discovered is that all the so-
called antidepressants actually increase the incidence of suicidality.

The FDA has required black box warning labels about drug-induced suicidality on all SSRI marketing materials, but that
was only accomplished after over-coming vigorous opposition from the drug-makers and marketers of the offending drugs,
who feared that such truth-telling would hurt their profits (it hasnt).

What can and does avert suicidality, of course, are not drugs, but rather interventions by caring, compassionate and
thorough teams of care-givers that include family, faith communities and friends as well as psychologists, counselors,
social workers, relatives (especially wise grandmas!), and, obviously, the limited involvement of drug prescribers.

Myth # 13:

Americas school shooters and other mass shooters are untreated schizophrenics who should have been taking
psych drugs

False. In actuality, 90% or more of the infamous homicidal and usually suicidal school shooters have already been
under the care of psychiatrists (or other psych drug prescribers) and therefore have typically been taking (or withdrawing
from) one or more psychiatric drugs.

SSRIs (such as Prozac) and psychostimulants (such as Ritalin) have been the most common classes of drugs involved.
Antipsychotics are too sedating, although an angry teen who is withdrawing from antipsychotics could easily become a
school shooter if given access to lethal weapons. (See www.ssristudies.net).

The 10% of school shooters whose drug history is not known, have typically had their medical files sealed by the
authorities probably to protect authorities such as the drug companies and/or the medical professionals who supplied the
drugs from suffering liability or embarrassment.
Important Comment: It should be noted that in most cases such 'False Flag' shooter events, that Mind-Controlled
assets are used in order to carry out events pushing Cabal-driven agenda's such as gun control. In virtually
EVERY case the 'perpetrators' are on multiple prescription drugs for mental health issues.

This is not a comfortable subject but it is one that you will need to confront sooner or later, as the truth will
become common knowledge at some point. Interspersed with the rest of this section are details of the reality
which hides behind the prescription drugs and their side effects -

Related: Monarch Mind Control & The MK-Ultra Program

The powerful drug industry and psychiatry lobby, with the willing help of the media that profits from being their
handmaidens, repeatedly show us the photos of the shooters that look like zombies.

They have successfully gotten the viewing public to buy the notion that these adolescent, white male school
shooters were mentally ill rather than under the influence of their crazy-making, brain-altering drugs or going
through withdrawal.

Contrary to the claims of a recent 60 Minutes program segment about untreated schizophrenics being responsible for half
of the mass shootings in America, the four mentioned in the segment were, in fact, almost certainly being already under the
treatment with psych drugs prior to the massacres by psychiatrists who obviously are being protected from public
identification and/or interrogation by the authorities as accomplices to the crimes or witnesses.
Related: CIA MKULTRA: They Intended To Use Drugs For Everything

Because of this secrecy, the public is being kept in the dark about exactly what crazy-making, homicidality-
inducing psychotropic drugs could have been involved.

The names of the drugs and the multinational corporations that have falsely marketed them as safe drugs are also being
actively protected from scrutiny, and thus the chance of prevention of future drug-related shootings or suicides is being
squandered.

Such decisions by Americas ruling elites represent public health policy at its worst and is a disservice to past
and future shooting victims and their loved ones.
Related: Confession Of A Human Programmer: Illuminati Mind Control

The four most notorious mass shooters that were highlighted in the aforementioned 60 Minutes segment included the
Virginia Tech shooter, the Tucson shooter, the Aurora shooter and the Sandy Hook shooter whose wild-eyed (drugged-
up) photos have been carefully chosen for their dramatic zombie-look effect, so that most frightened, paranoid
Americans are convinced that it was a crazy schizophrenic, rather than a victim of psychoactive, brain-altering, crazy-
making drugs that may have made him do it.

Parenthetically, it needs to be mentioned that many media outlets profit handsomely from the drug and medical industries.

Therefore those media outlets have an incentive to protect the names of the drugs, the names of the drug
companies, the names of the prescribing MDs and the names of the clinics and hospitals that could, in a truly just
and democratic world, otherwise be linked to the crimes.
Related: Are You A Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge? + The Term Conspiracy Theory Was Invented By The CIA In
Order To Prevent Disbelief Of Official Government Stories

Certainly if a methamphetamine-intoxicated person shot someone, the person who supplied the intoxicating drug would be
considered an accomplice to the crime, just like the bartender who supplied the liquor to someone who later committed a
violent crime would be held accountable.

A double standard obviously exists when it comes to powerful, respected and highly profitable corporations.

A thorough study of the scores of American school shooters, starting with the University of Texas tower shooter in 1966
and (temporarily) stopping at Sandy Hook, reveals that the overwhelming majority of them (if not all of them) were taking
brain-altering, mesmerizing, impulse-destroying, dont give a damn drugs that had been prescribed to them by well-
meaning but too-busy psychiatrists, family physicians or physician assistants who somehow were unaware of or were
misinformed about the homicidal and suicidal risks to their equally unsuspecting patients (and therefore they had failed to
warn the patient and/or the patients loved ones about the potentially dire consequences).

Related: Censorship Shock: Amazon.com Bans Investigative Book Nobody Died At Sandy Hook Because It
Disagrees With Government Version Of What Happened
Most practitioners who wrote the prescriptions for the mass shooters or for a patient who later suicided while under the
influence of the drug, will probably(and legitimately so) defend themselves against the charge of being an accomplice to
mass murder or suicide by saying that they were ignorant about the dangers of these cavalierly prescribed psych drugs
because they had been deceived by the cunning drug companies that had convinced them of the benign nature of the
drugs.

Myth # 14:

If your patient hears voices it means hes a schizophrenic

False. Auditory hallucinations are known to occur in up to 10% of normal people; and up to 75% of normal people have
had the experience of someone that isnt there calling their name. (www.hearing-voices.org/voices-visions).

Nighttime dreams, nightmares and flashbacks probably have similar origins to daytime visual, auditory and
olfactory hallucinations, but even psychiatrists dont think that they represent mental illnesses.

Indeed, hallucinations are listed in the pharmaceutical literature as a potential side effect or withdrawal symptom of many
drugs, especially psychiatric drugs.

These syndromes are called substance-induced psychotic disorders which are, by definition, neither mental illnesses nor
schizophrenia.

Rather, substance-induced or withdrawal-induced psychotic disorders are temporary and directly caused by the
intoxicating effects of malnutrition or brain-altering drugs such as alcohol, medications, hallucinogenic drugs and
other toxins.

Psychotic symptoms, including hallucinations and delusions, can be caused by substances such as alcohol, marijuana,
hallucinogens, sedatives, hypnotics, and anxiolytics, inhalants, opioids, PCP, and the many of the amphetamine-like drugs
(like Phen-Fen, [fenfluramine]), cocaine, methamphetamine, Ecstasy, and agitation-inducing, psycho-stimulating drugs like
the SSRIs).

Psychotic symptoms can also result from sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation and the withdrawal from certain drugs like
alcohol, sedatives, hypnotics, anxiolytics and especially the many dopamine-suppressing, dependency-inducing, sedating,
and zombifying anti-psychotic drugs.
Examples of other medications that may induce hallucinations and delusions include anesthetics, analgesics,
anticholinergic agents, anticonvulsants, antihistamines, antihypertensive and cardiovascular medications, some
antimicrobial medications, anti-parkinsonian drugs, some chemotherapeutic agents, corticosteroids, some gastrointestinal
medications, muscle relaxants, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and Antabuse.

The very sobering information revealed above should cause any thinking person, patient, thought-leader or politician to
wonder:

How many otherwise normal or potentially curable people over the last half century of psych drug propaganda
have actually been mis-labeled as mentally ill (and then mis-treated) and sent down the convoluted path of
therapeutic misadventures heading toward oblivion?

In my mental health care practice, I personally treated hundreds of patients who had been given a multitude of confusing
and contradictory mental illness labels, many of which had been one of the new diseases of the month for which there
was a new psych drug of the month that was being heavily marketed on TV.

Many of my patients had simply been victims of unpredictable drug-drug interactions (far too often drug-drug-
drug-drug interactions) or simply adverse reactions to psych drugs which had been erroneously diagnosed as a
new mental illness.

Extrapolating my 1,200 patient experience (in my little isolated section of the nation) to what surely must be happening in
America boggles my mind.

There has been a massive epidemic going on right under our noses that has affected millions of suffering victims
who could have been cured if not for the drugs.

The time to act on this knowledge is long overdue.

Seeding Doubt: How Self-Appointed Guardians Of Sound Science Tip The Scales
Toward Industry
November 23 2016 | From: TheIntercept

At a time when public mistrust of science runs high, and non-experts are hard-pressed to separate
fact from industry-sponsored spin, Sense About Science, a charity based in London with an
affiliate in New York, presents itself as a trustworthy arbiter.

The organization purports to help the misinformed public sift through alarmist claims about public health and the
environment by directing journalists, policymakers, and others to vetted sources who can explain the evidence
behind debates about controversial products like e-cigarettes and flame retardants.

Related: Scientific American Writer Exposes The Tribal Cultist Arrogance And Dogmatic Lunacy Of Science
'Skeptics'

One reason the public is so confused, suggested Tracey Brown, the groups director, in a recent Guardian op-ed, is that the
media feeds alarmism by focusing on who sponsors scientific studies, rather than asking more important questions about
whether the research is sound.

Even when there is no evidence of bias, Brown contended, journalists attack industry-funded research, running exposs on
subjects such as fracking, genetically modified plants, and sugar. Brown lamented that what she called the who funded it?
question is too often asked by people with axes to grind.

Browns downplaying of concerns about such research invites skepticism. Since the mid-1990s, numerous studies have
shown that industry-funded research tends to favor its sponsors products. This effect has been documented in research
financed by chemical, pharmaceutical, surgical, food, tobacco, and, we have learned most recently, sugar companies.

In the 1960s, the sugar industry secretly paid scientists to minimize the role sugar plays in causing heart disease and blame
saturated fat instead, according to a study published in the September issue of JAMA Internal Medicine.
Related: The Sugar Conspiracy - Professor John Yudkin: The Man Who Tried To Warn Us About Sugar

For decades, industry-funded research helped tobacco companies block regulations by undermining evidence that
cigarettes kill.

Precisely because of the very real risk of bias, prestigious scientific journals have long required researchers to disclose their
sources of support.

Journalists in pursuit of transparency have good reason to ask, Who funded it?

Sense About Science claims to champion transparency. The organization has campaigned to see the evidence behind
policy decisions and asked for pharmaceutical companies to release all the results of clinical trials, not just the positive
ones.

Nearly 700 organizations have signed on to the clinical trials initiative since it began last year. These are salutary efforts,
and Brown points out that with the exception of one program funded by publishers, none of the groups projects
are underwritten by companies. But this sidesteps a larger issue.

Sense About Science does not always disclose when its sources on controversial matters are scientists with ties to the
industries under examination. And the group is known to take positions that buck scientific consensus or dismiss emerging
evidence of harm.

When journalists rightly ask who sponsors research into the risks of, say, asbestos, or synthetic chemicals, theyd be well
advised to question the evidence Sense About Science presents in these debates as well.
A man holds a tobacco sample at the Seita-Imperial tobacco research center on May 29, 2012, in Fleury-les-Aubrais, France

In 2002, Dick Teverne, an English politician and business consultant, founded Sense About Science to expose bogus
science, he explains in his memoir, Against the Tide.

Through his consulting work, Taverne had cultivated relationships with energy, communications, food, and pharmaceutical
companies. Sense About Sciences early sponsors included some of Tavernes former clients and companies in which he
owned stock.

Taverne must have known the power of media narratives about science firsthand, because he had experience with the
tobacco industry, which labored mightily to change the conversation about its product in the face of evidence that cigarettes
were lethal.

According to internal documents released in litigation by cigarette manufacturers, Tavernes consulting company, PRIMA
Europe, helped British American Tobacco improve relations with its investors and beat European regulations on cigarettes in
the 1990s.

Taverne himself worked on the investors project: In an undated memo, PRIMA assured the tobacco company that:

The work would be done personally by Dick Taverne,because he was well placed to interview industry opinion
leaders and would seek to ensure that industrys needs are foremost in peoples minds.

During the same decade, Taverne sat on the board of the British branch of the powerhouse public relations firm Burson-
Marsteller, which claimed Philip Morris as a client.
Related: Heres How Industry-Funded Research Is Making Us Sick And Fat + Like Tobacco And Big Pharma, The
Sugar Industry Has Manipulated Research For 50 Years

The idea for a sound science group, made up of a network of scientists who would speak out against regulations that
industrial spokespeople lacked the credibility to challenge, was a pitch Burson-Marsteller made to Philip Morris in a 1994
memorandum.

Its not hard to identify traces of this approach in Tavernes later work. Writing in his 2005 book, The March of
Unreason, Taverne complained that eco-fundamentalists and fearmongers had fomented a backlash against science and
technology, which had in turn produced a multiplication of health and safety regulations.

That year British Petroleum donated 15,000 pounds to Sense About Science, and Taverne argued in the House of
Lords that as much as 80 percent of global warming might be attributable to solar activity, even though that theory had
been discredited two years earlier. Taverne, who stepped down as chairman of Sense About Science in 2012, did not
respond to The Intercepts requests for comment.

Sense About Science established an American affiliate in 2014, under the direction of a Brooklyn-based journalist named
Trevor Butterworth. In financial documents, Sense About Science claims Sense About Science USA as a sister organization
with close ties and similar aims.

High-profile scientific publishers, as well as such reputable institutions as the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and
Public Policy and the Columbia Journalism Review, have promoted Butterworths services to scientists and journalists.
Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming by Craig D. Idso, Robert M. Carter, S. Fred Singer

Related: Green Gestapo Says You're Mentally Ill If You Challenge Climate Change + Over 30,000 Scientists Say
'Catastrophic Man-Made Global Warming' Is A Complete Hoax And Science Lie

From 2003 to 2014, Butterworth contributed to the website of an organization called STATS, a nonprofit that promoted
statistical literacy. STATS had its own connections to the tobacco industry, in this case through founder Robert Lichter, a
conservative political scientist and now a communications professor at George Mason University.

Lichter also co-founded and continues to run the Center for Media and Public Affairs, which Philip Morris hired in 1994 to
survey news reports about tobacco as part of its strategy, outlined in a memo from March of that year, to counter personal
and public bias in stories about cigarettes health risks.

Lichter, like Sense About Sciences Tracey Brown, has argued that industry money doesnt necessarily taint the
science it supports.

In 2003, a congressional report charged the George W. Bush administration with stacking a government committee on
childhood lead poisoning with industry scientists.

Lichter appeared as an analyst on CNN and said;

Studies have found that scientists who have consulted for industry do not differ in their assessment of risks, of
health risks, from scientists who have not consulted for industry.

Lichter did not respond to The Intercepts requests for comment or citations to these studies.

Before STATS was dissolved in 2014, and its web site adopted by Sense About Science USA, it received regular grants
from free-market sources. Between 1998 and 2014, STATS received $4.5 million, 81 percent of its donations, from the
Searle Freedom Trust, the Sarah Scaife Foundation, the John M. Olin Foundation, Donors Trust (a fund largely sustained by
Charles Koch), and other right-wing foundations.

Searle, which describes its mission as promoting economic liberties, gave STATS $959,000 between 2010 and 2014.

Anti-regulatory foundations, including these, spent over half a billion dollars between 2003 and 2010 to;

Manipulate and mislead the public over the nature of climate science and the threat posed by climate
change, according to a 2013 study by Drexel University sociologist Robert Brulle.

A worker sprays foam before removing asbestos from a ceiling at Jussieu University in Paris, France, on March 25, 1999

With these roots Sense About Science should not surprise anyone when it promotes anti-regulatory voices on issues like
asbestos. In a 2006 brochure called Science for Celebrities and purporting to correct misperceptions about synthetic
chemicals, Sense About Science offers John Hoskins, a toxicologist formerly of the Medical Research Council Toxicology
Unit at the University of Leicester.

Under the rubric Toxic effects depend on dose, Hoskins reassures us:

Away from the high doses of occupational exposure a whole host of unwanted chemicals finds their way into our
bodies. Most leave quickly but some stay: asbestos and silica in our lungs, dioxins in our blood. Do they matter?
No!

More than two decades ago, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the International Agency for Research
on Cancer declared asbestos a proven human carcinogen.

Since then, as countries continue to mine asbestos, industry groups have argued that certain varieties, including chrysotile
and crocidolite, are not so toxic.
In response, several groups, including the Collegium Ramazzini, an international body of occupational and environmental
health experts, have issued consensus statements warning that no form of asbestos is safe at any dose.

In calling for a universal ban on all forms of asbestos in 2010, the Collegium Ramazzini observed that the asbestos
industrys attacks on evidence that irrefutably links its product to cancer closely resemble those used by the tobacco
industry.

Brown maintains that Sense About Science has not disagreed with the scientific consensus on asbestos, and she notes that
dose and type of exposure are the issue. But when I asked Hoskins why his position differed from the scientific consensus,
he shrugged over email, Once upon a time the consensus was that the earth is flat.

Hoskins further replied;

Unfortunately, to say that within a population low-level exposure of many chemicals must be dangerous is not
borne out by reality, much to the chagrin of those who live in the fantasy world of chemical-free.

Hoskinss rsum states that he has represented the Chrysotile Institute in discussion with the governments of several
countries. But he did not disclose this relationship to the Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health journal when he co-
authored two scientific papers disputing claims that chrysotile or crocidolite caused a rare cancer in exposed populations.

When his industry ties came to light, the journal issued errata for both papers to disclose this competing interest.

(Hoskins denies any conflict of interest, insisting that his role in authoring the papers was confined to providing
information the other authors requested. Yet all but one of the other authors had also failed to disclose their
asbestos interests, which now appear in the errata.)

Soon after the first paper appeared, eight public health researchers wrote a letter to the editors of Epidemiology,
Biostatistics and Public Health expressing outrage that the journal would publish a paper with gross mistakes and no
scientific content.

A group that included many of the letters signatories asked the journal to consider retracting the second paper, citing
seriously misleading information.

But the journals editors declined to retract the papers, which remain in the technical literature, casting doubt on the scientific
consensus that all forms of asbestos are hazardous to human health.

Flames threaten to jump a ridge that firefighting aircraft have painted red with fire retardant above Cajon Boulevard at the Blue Cut Fire on Aug. 18,
2016, near Wrightwood, California

It's hard to make a case for the safety of a substance like asbestos, which most people know causes cancer. Other
commercial products are easier to defend, not because they are less hazardous, but because consumers are not as familiar
with the evidence questioning their safety and utility.

Scientists have known since 1997 that flame retardants, for example, can cause cancer.

These brominated and chlorinated chemicals are used in a wide range of consumer products, including nursing pads and
car seats. For more than three decades, studies in animals and humans have linked them to cancer, developmental delays,
and other serious health problems.

By 2010, the evidence was so persuasive that nearly 150 scientists from 22 countries signed a statement warning that flame
retardants are a concern for persistence, bioaccumulation, long-range transport, and toxicity. Flame retardants fire safety
benefit not only remains unproven, the scientists asserted, but the chemicals form highly toxic byproducts when burned.

Sense About Science has long relied on dubious numbers to insist on the efficacy of these chemicals.

In 2006 it published a pamphlet on misconceptions about chemicals in which it claimed that British laws requiring flame
retardants in furniture had reduced fire deaths by 20 percent, citing a 2000 European Commission report called Flame
Retardants.
A European Commission press officer told me she knows of no such report.

The reference to the 20 percent reduction in fire deaths is repeatedly quoted in papers and publications from
flame retardant industries and associations, and they always refer to Flame Retardants, DG Environment Video
2000, which we cannot find.

On the contrary, she told me, it is simply not possible to correlate fire deaths to non-flammability requirements.

Who did make the claim? Flame retardant industry trade groups, including the European Flame Retardant Association and
the Bromine Science and Environmental Forum, run by Philip Morriss longtime PR firm Burson-Marsteller.

Where Flame Retardants are Found:

Realted: The Rise Of Scientific Fundamentalism

The U.S.-based Citizens for Fire Safety also repeated the claim until it disbanded, following revelations in 2012 that leading
flame retardant producers ran the organization, not the grassroots group of staff and volunteers committed to national fire
safety its literature asserted.

The same year, Sense About Science again called on John Hoskins, identified as an independent toxicologist, this time to
fact-check a study that found potentially carcinogenic flame retardants in sofas. In his response, Hoskins wrote: The bottom
line is that danger of fire is many, many times greater than any imagined danger from chemicals used to prevent it.
 Everything I wrote about flame retardants was taken from published works, Hoskins told me.

Reviewers at the time found nothing to criticize and I have had no comment from the thousands of people who
must have read the pieces.

Sense About Science reprinted its guide on chemicals in 2014. The trade-off between fire risk and toxicology is changing,
and we represented that newer precautionary thinking in our most recent publications, Brown, the groups director, told The
Intercept in an email.

The new guide acknowledged allegations of side effects from flame retardants, including persistence in the
environment and toxicity to humans and animals.

But it also retained the unsupported claim that regulations requiring the chemicals saved lives.

The guide even retained the text that countered concerns about traces of flame retardants found in childrens bodies by
asserting that because the chemicals protected children from death or injury from fire;

To fail to expose them to such chemicals could be regarded as negligent.

Scientists who reviewed human studies had come to a different conclusion the year before. They warned that although such
links were impossible to prove conclusively, the evidence suggested that childrens exposure to flame retardants could have
serious health consequences, including neurobehavioral and developmental problems. The scientists called for regulatory
oversight.

A scientist holds a flask containing bisphenol A, a chemical used to make plastics that numerous scientific studies have linked to developmental and
reproductive disorders
Related: The Cult Of 'Scientism' Explained: How Scientific Claims Behind Cancer, Vaccines, Psychiatric Drugs And
GMOs Are Nothing More Than Corporate-Funded Science Fraud

Of all the controversial chemicals in the public eye, the one Trevor Butterworth, Sense About Science USAs director, has
most fervently defended is bisphenol A, a compound used to make plastics. BPA is found in hard plastics, the lining of
canned drinks and foods, thermal receipts, and other consumer and industrial products, including cigarette filters.

Manufacturers produce billions of pounds of BPA each year. Its market value is projected to reach $20 billion by 2020. And
numerous studies and scientific consensus statements have linked BPA, which can interfere with hormone signaling, to
developmental and reproductive disorders.

Leading reproductive biologists released a consensus statement in 2007 warning that the wide range of adverse effects of
low doses of BPA in laboratory animals exposed both during development and in adulthood is a great cause for concern
with regard to the potential for similar adverse effects in humans.

Two years later, while working for STATS, Butterworth published a 27,000-word investigation sharply questioning the validity
of the scientific studies and news reports about BPAs health effects.

Related: Chemical Exposure Linked To Rising Diabetes, Obesity Risk

Butterworths central claim was that a handful of scientists, journalists, and environmental activist groups had ignored good
science in a crusade to paint BPA as the biological equivalent of global warming.

He singled out a widely acclaimed special report by Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reporters Susanne Rust and Meg Kissinger
called Chemical Fallout.

These reporters, he claimed, relied on flawed studies by independent researchers and unfairly dismissed the industry-
funded studies that found no harm.

But the independent studies were not, in fact, flawed. Regulators just didnt consider them useful, because, like many such
academic studies, they didnt measure toxicity but tested hypotheses about how BPA could alter living systems.

BPA trade groups have long insisted that the substance is metabolized too quickly to cause harm.

Butterworth cites a 2009 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study that measured BPA concentrations in newborns
to make the same case. The study, he argues, provides important evidence that infants - even those born prematurely - are
able to detoxify BPA in the same way as adults.

Related: Why Touching Receipts Can Harm Your Health

The CDC study he cited was designed to gauge exposure, not metabolism. BPA has been detected in the urine of nearly
every American tested. Premature babies fragile systems make them particularly vulnerable to environmental contaminants.

The researchers suspected that the use of plastic medical devices in neonatal intensive care units might expose premature
infants to higher than average levels of BPA. And thats exactly what they found: Average BPA concentrations in
hospitalized premature babies were about 10 times higher than those measured in adults.

The authors noted that although premature babies appear to have some ability to metabolize BPA, their detoxification
pathways are not expected to be functional at adult rates until months after birth.

Butterworth ended his critique of what he called the BPA is dangerous thesis by suggesting that banning the chemical
could result in greater harm:

What if some parents who turned to glass bottles for fear of leaching BPA drop and break them, causing injury
to their babies?

Butterworths arguments have reverberated across an echo chamber of free-market organizations, including Philip
Morriss product defense law firm, Koch-funded think tanks, chemical and food-packaging industry trade
groups in Europe and the U.S., and an ostensibly neutral environmental health research foundation run by a chemical
industry PR firm.

Reached by email for comment, Butterworth did not account for his questionable characterization of the CDC study. He
said that his critique relied on the work of scientists from regulatory agencies involved in risk assessment, and that these
scientists had criticized smaller studies that claimed adverse effects.

He maintained that studies assessing the effects of low doses of BPA are inconsistent and unlikely to capture significant
results because of methodological and statistical problems.

The year after Butterworths 2009 investigation, the anti-regulatory Donors Trust awarded STATS $86,000 for its research
efforts, and the Grocery Manufacturers Association, which belongs to the BPA Joint Trade Association, gave Lichters
Center for Media and Public Affairs $10,000 for research support.
Related: The Top 10 Tricks Used By Corporate Junk Science

Butterworth continued to defend BPA in news outlets and in 2013 made his case on a blog for Coca-Cola, another BPA
Joint Trade Association member.

That year Coca-Cola gave more than $30,000 to Butterworths future partner, Sense About Science, which hosted a BPA
forum the next year. (Since then, Sense About Science has not received corporate donations, which represented less than
3 percent of our income, Brown wrote in an email.)

In the forum, a Q&A on social media, Sense About Science put forward a representative of the British Plastics Federation
and a toxicologist whose longstanding ties to the chemical industry the organization did not disclose. Participants were
assured that BPA posed no risk to human health.

Several plastic industry trade sites praised the event. One welcomed Sense About Sciences efforts, reporting that plastic
packaging was stoutly defended.
Sales staff exhale vapor while demonstrating their electronic cigarette products at the Vape China Expo at the China International Exhibition Center
in Beijing on July 23, 2015

The tobacco industry pioneered tactics to fight regulations by manufacturing doubt about the scientific consensus that
cigarettes kill. So it should be no surprise to encounter a strategy among defenders of the e-cigarette that also centers
around doubt. If we dont know for certain that a product is safe, we might urge caution.

Sense About Science has argued the opposite: so long as we dont know the product is unsafe, medical professionals have
no business urging regulation.

E-cigarettes turn chemical solutions into a nicotine-filled mist, which consumers ingest without the added harm of
tobacco tar.

When the devices hit the American market in 2007, sales quickly took off. Tobacco companies increasingly dominate the
industry, which is projected to be worth $54 billion by 2025. A recent national survey found a sharp rise in e-cigarette
smoking among high school students - from 1.5 percent in 2011 to 16 percent last year.

The skyrocketing popularity of e-cigarettes among young people worries public health experts because so little is
known about the devices safety.

E-cigarettes are too new for scientists to have assessed their long-term health risks. British and American scientific bodies
have reacted to this paucity of evidence with different views of the relative dangers.
Last year, Public Health England joined other British public health organizations in encouraging smokers to use e-cigarettes
as an aid in quitting tobacco. The Royal College of Physicians effectively endorsed this view in April, when it argued against
regulating a product that could help smokers quit.

But American public health officials worry that nicotine, which is as addictive as heroin and cocaine, will hook young
smokers and cause lasting harm to their still-developing brains. Nicotine is linked to immunosuppression as well as
cardiovascular, respiratory, and gastrointestinal disorders.

There is evidence that it interferes with chemotherapies and may even play a role in cancer. Researchers are just beginning
to study whether the more than 7,000 flavoring chemicals, which typically arent disclosed on e-cigarettes, are safe when
inhaled.

Back in 2012, the British Medical Association called for a ban on the devices in public in order to:

Ensure their use does not undermine smoking prevention and cessation by reinforcing the normalcy of cigarette
use.

BMA reaffirmed this judgment as recently as this past June, despite the opposing position of the Royal College of
Physicians. Sense About Science reacted to BMAs call for a ban by asking the association to produce evidence that e-
cigarettes caused harm.

This move towards heavy regulation appears to be driven by the fear that e-cigs might be harmful or act as a
gateway to conventional tobacco - despite little or no evidence for either claim, the organization argued on its
website in 2013, two years before Public Health England endorsed e-cigarettes as a tool to quit smoking.
Such regulations, Sense About Science stated, could do more harm than good by inhibiting access to products that may
help reduce harm from smoking tobacco cigarettes.

Although Sense About Science has demanded evidence that e-cigarettes cause harm, it seems poised to cast doubt on the
evidence when it turns up. In August, the organization challenged the relevance of research presented that month at a
cardiology conference showing that nicotine in e-cigarettes can stiffen arteries, an early indication of heart disease.

Sense About Sciences expert dismissively compared the effects of nicotine documented in the research to those
of watching a thriller or a football match.

In the United States, just this past May, the Food and Drug Administration moved to regulate e-cigarettes, including banning
sales to those 18 and under. The CDC, too, takes the health risks of nicotine seriously. Last fall, the centers called for
strategies to reduce the use of all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes.

The potential long-term benefits and risks associated with e-cigarette use are not currently known, the
CDC reported. What is known is that nicotine exposure at a young age may cause lasting harm to brain
development, promote nicotine addiction, and lead to sustained tobacco use.
David Koch, executive vice president of chemical technology for Koch Industries, listens as U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, not
pictured, speaks to the Economic Club of New York on Nov. 20, 2012

Having established itself as a credible voice in debates about science and industrial regulation in the United States and
Britain, Sense About Science has set out for what may prove to be its most challenging assignment.

In July, following Britains vote to leave the European Union, Sense About Science established an EU branch in Brussels,
the headquarters of the European Commission, which has placed tighter restrictions on e-cigarettes, chemicals, and other
potentially risky consumer goods than the United States has mustered.

The new branch of Sense About Science plans to monitor the use and abuse of scientific evidence in EU policy.

Both Sense About Science and Sense About Science USA undertake some initiatives that serve the public interest. But the
founder of the British organization worked with the architects of the tobacco industrys disinformation strategy, and both
groups have been known to promote science that favors private interests over public health.

When an organization claims to serve as a neutral arbiter in high-stakes debates about science, it pays to do what
Sense About Science does: ask for the evidence.

Related: Official Science: The Grand Illusion

Do You Really Understand The Health Risks From Microwave Technology? + The
Health Effects Of Microwave Radiation Spelled Out
November 19 2016 | From: ActivistPost / EnergyFanatics / Various

One of the most definitive, expansive and inclusive peer-reviewed papers Ive ever read on any
subject was published July 25, 2016 online at Electronic Physician as an open access article that
I sincerely hope everyone in the media and healthcare industries will take extremely seriously.
Especially those who are promoting more and more smart appliances and devices that transmit electromagnetic
frequencies and radiofrequencies - microwaves, which damage human health more than we are being told by
government health agencies at all levels (local, state and national), manufacturers, employers and school districts
that even mandate their uses as new technologies to learn and to implement.

Related: Cellphone Radiation Warning Sparks First Amendment Battle

New technologies are fine IF and WHEN they take into consideration and implement safeguards for human health,
which is not the case with microwave technology, but has been the "dream warfare" technology for the United States
military and other governments, so anything goes, including our being bombarded with so much microwaves, we now are
experiencing more adverse health effects attributed to what's scientifically termed "Non-thermal Adverse Health Effects."
Related: Electronic Torture + 21st-Century Bio-Hacking And Bio-Robotizing

The U.S. military has had a GREAT interest in keeping microwave safety standards higher than they should be and not as
applicable as the science demands.

Dr Magda Havas, PhD, Environmental & Resource Studies, 1600 West Bank Drive, Trent University, Peterborough, ON,
Canada, K9J 7B8 on her website published the following incriminating unclassified U.S. Army documents information as to
why microwaves are not safe, nor made safer, due to U.S. military involvement with its electronic warfare techniques, which
harm everything.

There are two disturbing paragraphs in the document "Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation (Radiowaves and
Microwaves) - Eurasian Communist Countries (U)". Prepared by U.S. Army Medical Intelligence and Information Agency
Office of the Surgeon General and released by the Defense Intelligence Agency.

Adams, R.L. and R.A. Williams. 1976. 34 pp. Unclassified, which clearly indicate the U.S. military's perspective opposing
more stringent guidelines for microwave radiation.

No. 1: "If the more advanced nations of the West are strict in the enforcement of stringent exposure standards,
there could be unfavorable effects on industrial output and military function.

The Eurasian Communist countries could, on the other hand, give lip service to strict standards, but allow their
military to operate without restriction and thereby gain the advantage in electronic warfare techniques and the
development of antipersonnel applications." [Page vii]

No. 2: "Should subsequent research result in adoption of the Soviet standard by other countries, industries whose
practices are based on less stringent safety regulations, could be required to make costly modifications in order to
protect workers.

Recognition of the 0.01 mW/cm2 standard could also limit the application of new technology by making the
commercial exploitation of some products unattractive because of increased cost, imposed by the need for
additional safeguards." [Page 24]

Below is the copy and paste job of the Introduction from A review on Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and the reproductive
system, which I hope my readers will take seriously and also take necessary steps to protect yourselves, your children, your
pets and your home environment.

Generation Zapped

This is SERIOUS stuff no one is taking as seriously as we ALL should. Those smart gadgets just may be making you
more sick than you can imagine. With 61 References, I think the Electronic Physician article needs to be taken seriously
with revisions made to EMF/RF standards by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to reflect them.

"People in the modern world frequently are exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Human exposure to EMFs
comes from many sources, and situations are different in people's everyday lives.

EMFs emanate from power lines, computer devices, televisions, radios, and telephones. There are many factors
that influence the degree to which people may be affected by EMFs. For example, body weight, body-mass index,
bone density, and the levels of water and electrolytes can alter the conductivity of and biological reactivity to EMFs
(1, 2).

Therefore, the effects of this environmental pollution can depend on gender, tissue density of the body, the
period of life, and the exposure levels to EMFs.

Beginning in 1960 when the biological hazards caused by EMFs first were studied, human health became an
important focus in the workplace and at home (3).

Although, the biological effects of EMFs are still controversial, in general, the negative effects should not be
ignored.

Currently, people are exposed to various types of EMFs, which are non-ionic radiation that cannot release
electrons.

They are energy in the form of oscillating electric and magnetic fields that are transformed from one point to
another. Many forms of physical energy, such as X-rays, UV light, and sunlight produce EMFs (4).

There are several references that classify EMFs, but, in general, they can be considered to consist of four different
types. The first type of EMFs refers to extremely low frequency (ELF) EMFs, which are EMFs that are below 300
HZ, and they are produced by military equipment and railroads.

The second type, known as intermediate frequency (IF) EMFs, have frequencies in the range of 300 Hz to 10
MHZ, and they are produced by industrial cables and electrical equipment in homes, such as televisions and
computer monitors.

The third type is hyper frequency (HF) EMFs that have frequencies in the range of 10 MHz to 3000 GHz and are
produced by mobile phones and radio broadcasting. Radio frequencies (RFs) also are a part of this category,
which has frequencies up to 100 MHz (4).

There are also static EMFs that are produced by MRI and geomagnetism and have specified with zero frequency
(3).

In 1979, Wertheimer and Looper showed that there is a direct relationship between EMFs and the increased
incidence of leukemia in infants (5).

If the body's biological system is exposed to EMFs, which produce electric currents and fields, which, in fact, deal
with the current and voltage, the normal physiological balance is upset.

If the density of the electric current increases to the stimulation threshold, membrane depolarization of the nerves
and muscles may result. Electric and magnetic fields at environmental levels may extend the lifetime of free
radicals and result in damage to people's deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (6).

Some epidemiological studies have been done in various populations, but most have been done in laboratory
animals and cell lines (4).

The biological effects of EMFs generally can be divided into thermal and non-thermal effects (7). Thermal effects
are defined as the heat generated by EMFs in a specific area.

The non-thermal effects depend on the absorption of energy and changes in the behavior of tissues without
producing heat. EMFs have high penetration power, and they are capable of moving charged particles, such as the
electrons and ions of large macromolecules and polymers (7).

So EMFs can have devastating effects on tissue with high concentrations of electrons and ions.

EMFs that cause changes in the behavior of cells (8) and tissues alter the function of the cardiovascular system (9)
and bone marrow (7).

Electromagnetic fields can have several different effects on cellular components (10), including disorders of cell
proliferation and differentiation (10), damaged DNA in cells, chromosomal abnormalities (11), blood
disorders (9), birth defects (12), and various mutations, including those associated with long-term exposure to
EMFs.

Under the influence of these fields, the balance of the CNS and the hormonal and respiratory systems become
weak, resulting in decreased activity of the mentioned organs (13, 14).

Research on the effects of EMFs on the endocrine system has focused mostly on melatonin and the derived
tryptophan produced by the pineal gland (15).

Most of the harmful effects of EMFs act through the protein synthesis process (16, 17). In this regard,
enzymes, due to their combination of amino acids, are affected, and their catalytic activity is decreased (4).

Studies concerning the cytotoxicicity and genotoxicity effects of EMFs mostly have focused on fibroblasts,
 melanocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, and muscular cells in people and on the granolosa cells of rats (18).

A declassified 1976 Defense Intelligence Agency report showed that military personnel exposed to non-thermal
microwave radiation experienced "headaches, fatigue, dizziness, irritability, sleeplessness, depression,
anxiety, forgetfulness, and a lack of concentration (19).

A 2015 study showed that 2.4 GHz WiFi may be one of the major risk factors for brain tumors and other
neurodegenerative diseases (20). Another 2015 paper showed that polarized EMF (man-made) was much more
active biologically than non-polarized EMF (21).

Another paper showed that rabbits experienced heart arrhythmia and increased blood pressure when exposed to
2.4 GHz Wi-Fi (22). A long-term study conducted by Lennart Hardell, a Swedish scientist, on glioma and acoustic
neuroma brain tumors showed that RF is carcinogenic.

The scientist called for RF to be labeled an IARC Class 1 Carcinogen and recommended urgent revision to safety
guidelines (23). A 2011 study by Nora Volkow showed that radiation from cell phones, in areas next to the
antenna, increased the metabolism of glucose in the brain.

Increased metabolism of glucose is associated with cancer. The study showed that biological changes occur at
levels lower than the current FCC guidelines (24)."

The Health Effects Of Microwave Radiation Spelled Out

On 14 July 2016 the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) of the USA made space available
in the radio spectrum for consumer devices to operate within the 25 GHz to 100 GHz of the
electromagnetic spectrum. It went on to say:

Related: Heads in the Sand , Pies in the Sky - Health Canada Denies the Proven Dangers of Microwave Radiation
"The Commission has struck a balance between new wireless services, current and future fixed satellite service
operations, and federal uses. The item adopts effective sharing schemes to ensure that diverse users including
federal and non-federal, satellite and terrestrial, and fixed and mobile can co-exist and expand.

Nowhere in its document is mention made of consumer safety or well-being. I guess that is fair of the FCC because
historically, it is not interested in matters of microwave radiation and consequent thermal and non-thermal effects on the
population. Lets face it, and most people find this hard to believe, the FCC works purely on behalf of the telecoms
industries in granting them access to the airwaves, no more and no less.

Industry was very happy to hear the FCC announcement on granting access of large portions of the radio spectrum for yet
more of its toys and other consumer devices.

Qualcomm for example talks much about the massive internet of things, yet nowhere on its 5G musings is
mention made of consumer safety or well-being.

Related: Why It Matters: Council Votes 7-0 in Favour of Better Cell Phone Warnings on Advice of Brain Tumour
Association

That pink elephant in the living room regarding safety brings me to the point of this article. The FCC and the telecomms
industry rub their hands with glee because lots of money is going to be made as 5G devices rollout yet no recent safety
studies have been carried out on consumer safety.

No doubt both the FCC and industry will point regulators to the old, out-dated and one-dimensional so-called safety studies
(thermal effects) produced by the ICNIRP.

This private organisation is comprised of people and individuals who work in the telecommunications industries
with no background in epidemiology, toxicology, radio frequency safety or medical practice.

The implications of 5G on consumer well-being and safety do not look good for one reason: devices that will operate within
the 5G electromagnetic spectrum will use antennas that are physically small i.e. from a few millimetres to a centimetre in
length.

This means that industry will produce a variety of different antenna systems to do different things.

The weird fact of operating within this very high frequency range is that signals are mostly line of sight or they are
easily reflected, refracted or lost within the differing build composition of urban environment structures.
Related: The Gloves Come Off On EMF / Mobile / WiFi Radiation + Understanding The Dangers Of The 5G Rollout

In other words, without careful antenna design and recognition of many of the pitfalls trying to propagate microwave signals
within urban environments, the signal can be easily degraded or completely lost.

In response to these challenges, the advantages in using very small physical size antennas in the millimetre wavelength is
you can feed many antennas in various configuration arrays e.g. vertical or horizontal arays, waveguide, coned or highly
directional beam type designs.

These types of antenna designs focus most of the transmitted power into specified directions.

This is bad news for consumers because these very small physical size antennas will pack a mighty punch to our biological
systems if we step into them.

Getting back to consumer safety and well-being and all things microwave, it is clear that the latency period for adverse
biological effects from devices using microwave frequencies from say 1 GHz to 5 Ghz is approximately 10 20 years.

In 2016 there are now many thousands of peer-reviewed medical and epidemiological studies that show, illustrate
or correlate, adverse biological effects with use of mobile phone technology or WIFI.
Related: The Science is Overwhelming At This Point Wifi Industry Appeals Brain Tumor Association Ordinance

Using frequencies even higher than 5 GHz (and up to 100 GHz) will compress the timeframe in which cancers and other
biological effects show themselves within society.

It is anyones guess on what might happen in terms of biological safety yet it is clear to see that the pulsed nature of these
high frequency, high signal intensity signals do not harbour good news for humanity, particularly in relation to the functioning
of our DNA.

Nowadays, exposure to microwave radiation or frequencies used by WIFI, mobile phones, smart phones, smart meters,
WIFI-enabled audio devices, WIFI-enabled fridges, most baby monitors and a whole host of other esoteric electrical
devices were recently classed as Class 2B carcinogens.

Point of sale literature excludes this fact on any advertising blurb and it is also fascinating that the small print embedded
deep within mobile phone product literature say that you should not put these devices directly to your skin, body or face. If
you do, you exceed the so-called safe exposure thresholds put in place for these devices.
Related: 5G Telecomm Radiation The Perfect Tool To Mass Modify Human Brain Waves + More Studies Reveal
Dangers

Getting back to the very small physical length of the antennas that will be used for 5G devices, it is very clear to surmise that
if these devices talk to each other using highly efficient, directional antennas, the ERP (effective radiated power) will be
huge.

If you happen to walk into this intensely focused beam of microwave radiation, what will this level of signal intensity do to
your biology?

Yet again, time will tell unless we get our arses into gear and demand proper safety studies from industry and independent
academia that focus on thermal and non-thermal effects on our biology.

Just like the advent of modern mobile phone technology, it is us, the consumers, who provide the guinea pig role in terms of
safety.

Sufferers of EHS (electro-hyper-sensitivity) will need to be aware of any 5G device simply because the electron volt
assault on their compromised bodies will be easily and instantly felt.

It is they who will suffer first and in time, everyone will be affected because one other fact the telecoms industries have not
mentioned is that in order to develop an efficient network of signals within an urban environment, many thousands of new
transmitter sites will need to be installed.
Related: Gestapo In The USA: FCC Intimidates Press And Kills Free Speech At 5G Rollout

The physical small size of these antennas means they can be covertly installed into all sorts of urban structures which
suggest that for urban dwellers at least, there will be no escape from exposure to these highly damaging microwave
frequencies.

I also feel that when these antennas are in place, it will be relatively easy to alter and manipulate brain wave
function of its users and others close by.

The amount of ancillary information that can be piped or attached to the main carrier frequency of such a
telecommunications network system is potentially, huge. Police forces the world over use Tetra as a systems of
communication.

This system also includes a sub-carrier frequency of about 16 Hz which is very close to our natural brainwave
patterns.

Could this 16 Hz ancillary pulsed ELF (extremely low-frequency) be responsible for instilling aggressive behaviours in our
police force personnel?

The zombie apocalypse might just be around the corner unless of course, we refuse to comply. That is our choice.

Related: Wireless Mouse, Wireless Keyboard, Tablet - See the Wireless Radiation Measured

Natural Health: The Silver Bullet To Medical Vampires + Australia To Search Out And
Prosecute Anti-Vax Nurses And Midwives; Calls For Public To Turn Them In
November 16 2016 | From: Sott / NaturalBlaze / Various
It turns out that unvaccinated children aren't little time bombs walking around ready to blow and
spread devastating disease in their wake. That's a myth. It's told by the medical cartel, for their
own obvious reasons.

And it turns out that children raised in a healthy way are strong, and have strong immune systems. This was once
viscerally known and understood and accepted as a truism.

Related: CDC Blocks Whistleblower From Vaccine Injury Testimony

Those who insist on 50 or 60 shots of germs and toxic chemicals for every child, like it or not, are participating in an ongoing
criminal enterprise.

Their vision is unnatural and perverse.

It turns out that stimulating the production of antibodies - which is the purpose of vaccines - is not the be-all and
end-all of existence. It isn't the road to health. It isn't an automatic lease on life.

Every aspect of a child's life contributes to, or detracts from, his immune-system health and strength. This is traditional
knowledge. This basic tree of knowledge has been shaken and hacked at by decades of remorseless propaganda from
official medical/government/corporate mob bosses.

The vaccine establishment has become a protection racket. Take your shots or pay the social and political consequences.
Natural health is a reality. It isn't a stunt.

When smallpox ravaged England, it wasn't the lone work of a virus. It was sewage in the city streets, horrendous
overcrowding, lack of basic nutrition, grinding poverty. It was also the smallpox vaccine:

"Smallpox, like typhus, has been dying out (in England) since 1780. Vaccination in this country has largely fallen into disuse
since people began to realize how its value was discredited by the great smallpox epidemic of 1871-2 (which occurred after
extensive vaccination)." (W. Scott Webb, A Century of Vaccination, Swan Sonnenschein, 1898.)

And then there is this:

The combined death rate from scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles among children up to fifteen
shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had occurred before the
introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization.

In part, this recession may be attributed to improved housing and to a decrease in the virulence of micro-
organisms, but by far the most important factor was a higher host-resistance due to better nutrition."

- Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis, Bantam Books, 1977

Improve environmental conditions and the standard of living, and you pave the way for natural health. It's not a
mystery. It never was.

The basic purpose of promoting these dud "epidemics" that come down the pipeline every few years is: to
convince the population that they can't live in a state of natural health; there is no such thing as natural health;
everyone must live their lives under the constant supervision of doctors.

This is becoming the central myth of our times. It is becoming the primary form of surrender. Natural health is a silver bullet
to medical vampires.
Related: Former UK Govt Science Chief Warned Of MMR Vaccine-Autism Link

How many studies can you find that investigate the factors of health in children who do quite well without overriding medical
attention? How many studies in peer reviewed journals examine large groups of healthy unvaccinated children? None.

Health is basically a non-medical condition. The primary medical psyop is the effort to erase that understanding.

Every healthy unvaccinated child is a refutation of the medical cartel.

If your business is sickness, and you're unscrupulous, it stands to reason you'll try to find more and more
sickness, even, and especially, where it doesn't exist.

You'll never study health, because it would put you out of business.

Related Articles:

CDC vaccine science covers up giant conflict of interest

30,000 Indian Girls Suffering From Cancer Vaccine Tests Conducted By The Gates Foundation

The Toxic Science of Flu Vaccines

Media dare not report wave of paralyzed children caused by vaccines

Australia To Search Out And Prosecute Anti-Vax Nurses And Midwives; Calls For
Public To Turn Them In
While Australia whines about the lack of democracy and freedom in places like Syria, it is doing
everything in its power to ensure that nothing resembling either of those things is allowed within
its own borders.
Apparently having found itself in a race with France, Germany, the UK and the United States, for which country can
eliminate personal liberties, freedom of speech - or even thought - while launching wars all across the world on the
basis of protecting those things, Australia is proving itself to be a capable competitor.

Related: CDC police will eventually arrest the unvaccinated as diseased criminals

The examples of Australias thought control policies are legion, but the most recent is surrounding the vaccination hysteria in
the ability of free adults to choose whether or not they accept toxic chemicals (or life-saving medicines with no side effects)
into their bodies.

According to a report by the Guardian, the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia has announced a fatwa of jihad against
nurses and midwives who discourage vaccination or are critical of vaccines.

After releasing vaccination standards the boards statement reads:

The board is taking this opportunity to make its expectations about providing advice on vaccinations clear to
registered nurses, enrolled nurses and midwives. The board expects all registered nurses, enrolled nurses and
midwives to use the best available evidence in making practice decisions."

Of course, when the board says best available evidence it means vaccine fanaticism and unquestioning
adherence to faith-based science.

Under Australian law, promoting false, misleading or deceptive information will be prosecuted by the Australian health
practitioner regulation agency. The NMBA is specifically targeting nurses and midwives who question the safety or
effectiveness of vaccination via social media.

The statement goes even further by urging members of the public to report nurses or midwives who are doing so even on
social media.

Obviously, Australia must consider one of its founding documents to be George Orwells 1984 although we are afraid
Australian leadership may have missed the point of the book.
Related: The end of medical freedom and the rise of mandatory vaccinations

Professor of Midwifery at the University of Western Sydney, Dr. Hannah Dahlan supports the new policy. She says;

I agree that they have a very serious obligation to provide the best available evidence, and it is of course
concerning that some are taking to social media in order to express a position not backed by science.

But Dahlan also says that she is worried that the policy may have some unintended effects.

The worry, she says, is the confirmation bias that can occur, because people might say: there you go, this is
proof that you cant even have an alternative opinion. It might in fact just give people more fuel for their belief
systems.

Actually, this is undeniably proof that you cant even have an alternative opinion. In case Mrs. Dahlans degree did
not require an understanding of logic, banning someone from expressing an alternative opinion does indeed serve
as proof to them that they are not allowed to have an alternative opinion.

In all fairness, neither Dahlan nor the NMBA are saying you cannot have an alternative belief that contradicts the Borg. They
are merely saying that if you express that belief even on social media, you will lose your job, have your license to practice
taken away and possibly be sent to jail.

If anyone ever proved Voltaires statement that in order to learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not
allowed to criticize the NMBA has closed the case.
Remember, when Dahlan worries about positions that are not backed by science, she does not mean science, but Big
Pharma, the NMBA that Big Pharma owns and the Australian government. Coming from a government that only 40 years
ago did not even consider its indigenous people to be humans, we definitely say there is room for error.

Predictably, the Australia Medical Association is getting in on the act too. The AMA President, Dr. Michael Gannon
stated, Immunization saves lives. That is an undeniable fact."

Notwithstanding the redundancy of the latter part of the brilliant Dr. Gannons statement, that immunization saves
lives is very deniable and is in no way a fact.

Gannon also touted the governments no jab, no pay policy as having improved public health because 6,000 children whose
parents who had previously registered as conscientious objectors were effectively threatened with the possibility of not being
able to feed those children, losing them, or losing their homes into vaccinating.
Of course, Gannons statement proves nothing, except that 6,000 children were vaccinated, not that public health
was improved.

Indeed, according to Gannons logic, we could disembowel 795 million people and claim that we eliminated world hunger.
Thankfully, no one is arguing to do that, but lets hope that Dr. Gannon is never made president of the World Food Program.

In all seriousness, however, the new initiative by the NMBA is just yet another example of the downward spiral of Australia
and most of the Western world into authoritarianism and into a scientific dictatorship.

While Westerners shiver in fear over Vladimir Putin defending his borders, they are none the wiser as their own
countries march directly down the same path as Russia in the early 20th century.

Related: CDC vaccine whistleblower and the silence that kills

10 Monumentally False Claims Made By Conventional Medicine About Health + How

Far Has The Medical Profession Fallen From The Hippocratic Oath?
November 14 2016 | From: NaturalBlaze / PreventDisease / Various

The grossly deceptive world we live in couldnt be better exemplified than by conventional
medicine. More and more people are expressing their distrust.
They see right through conventional medicines crooked corporate greed-driven hidden ulterior motives.

Related: The Flawed Germ Theory; Unfortunately The Basis Of Modern Medicine

It starts with a deliberately narrow corporate-sponsored curriculum in medical schools. This essentially mechanistic,
pharmaceutical drug-based approach to health takes the focus of attention away from other alternative health practices
to reduce competition.

In research institutions, ulterior motives find their way into corporate-sponsored bad science to favour desired experimental
outcomes related to profit. Crooked approval bodies then turn a blind eye to a new products potential harm while there are
agendized political self-interests from corrupt politicians having their hand in allowing the product to get into the market.

Then theres the paid-off mainstream media to repetitively spread the related lies, deception and cover-ups. In
short, money is stronger than truth.

The health care system is a dismal failure because of these greed-driven corporations, governments and related crooked
institutions. Indeed, they dont have our best interest at heart and are capable of doing far more harm than good.

In light of this, here are 10 monumentally false claims made by conventional medicine about health:

False Claim #1 The Zika Virus Causes Birth Defects

Because of a lack of scientific evidence, particularly from Brazil in recent months, the claim that the Zika virus causes
microcephaly (severe birth defects resulting in an abnormally small head circumference) has received some major
challenges. The CDC claimed that Zika was mainly transmitted via the mosquito Aedes Aegypti.

They stated that the transmitted virus finds its way into the pregnant mother and then infects her foetus causing
microcephaly.
However, the Brazilian health authorities admitted that there was some other cause-and-effect relationship because of the
lack of evidence supporting the mosquito claim. This was backed up by a recent study from the New England Journal of
Medicine. Having examined 12,000 Zika-infected women no microcephaly was found. So it was concluded that Zika does
not cause microcephaly.

Consider the media-hyped hysteria prior to this conclusion. What about the unnecessary toxic chemical spraying to kill off
the disease-carrying mosquitoes, forced abortions, vaccines and drugs used as countermeasures based on a false
pretext? Then there are the biotech companies who greatly benefited from manufacturing their GM mosquitoes.

The Zika claim was a deliberately created scam for profit and the advancement of hidden agendas, such as a depopulation
agenda (Agenda 21 aka 2030), typical of a false flag disease. Whether its Zika or any other claim more people need to
wake up and recognise the patterns that make up a false flag disease to then take the necessary opposing action

False Claim #2 - EMFs (Electromagnetic Fields) Dont Cause Harm

The harmful effects of invisible EMFs are only perceived when ill-health manifests as a consequence of usage: Used in
conjunction with the various wireless apps, cell phones, laptops, tablets then there are smart meters, microwave ovens
and other radiations sources, these EMF sources interfere with our own natural bio-electromagnetic energy fields.
Do your research and pay heed to the potential dangers of this deceptively harmful technology.

Related: Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity From Microwave Technology Finally Medically Proven

False Claim #3 - Only Conventional Medicine Can Effectively Treat The Life-Threatening Illnesses
Such As cancer, Heart Disease And Diabetes

As already mentioned with medical schools, when it comes to the treatment of disease, anything outside of conventional
medicines mechanistic, pharmaceutical drug-based approach is basically ignored.

Very little, or not enough time (if any time at all), is devoted to the highly effective roles played by the mind-body-spirit
connection, nutrition, water and the environment in health and healing.

In relationship to health and healing, how can anyone not give these factors serious attention when they address the very
fabric of our being?

This wilful ignorance has made conventional medicine blind to the facts that there are cheaper, non-toxic, natural, alternative
approaches that have produced highly effective results though addressing the above factors and are capable of curing life-
threatening disease.

Related: Medical Establishment Doesn't Like Baking Soda Cancer Treatment Because Its Too Effective And Too
Cheap

False Claim #4 - Diet / Nutrition Does Not Play A Major Role In The Prevention / Reversal Of
Cancer

Following on from 2, using cancer as an example and the role nutrition plays in the prevention/reversal of the life-threatening
illnesses. Conventional medicines wing, the Cancer Research establishment, has basically ignored the life-saving, healing
capabilities of diet/nutrition. Take, for instance, the acid and alkaline diets:

Related: Clive de Carle: How You Can Restore Your Health, Enabling Your Body To Self-Repair From Virtually Any
Disease Or Affliction

It has been established that the bodys blood pH lies somewhere between 7.3 7.45. If your blood pH is outside this range
then youd be dead. If someone eats toxic acid foods (essentially junk food) frequent and long-term, lowering the bloods pH,
then this could lead to a serious illness such as cancer.

The healthier option is to eat alkaline foods (e.g. pineapple juice, greens such as broccoli, spinach, watercress and the anti-
cancer B17 rich foods like apricots or almondsetc) that alkalize the body, give rise to a higher blood pH.

Further, conventional medicine has invalidated, suppressed or even ridiculed a number of brilliant and
humane innovators with their cancer cures related to diet/nutrition.

There are, for examples, the highly effective Gerson Therapy pioneered by Max Gerson, Harry Hoxeys herbal remedies and
Dr Tullio Simoncinis Cancer is a Fungus using sodium bicarbonate injections. All these innovations deal with a metabolic
dietary deficiency related to a frequent and long-term bad acid diet.

Related: The 20 Biggest Cancer Lies You've Been Brainwashed To Believe By The For-Profit Cancer Industry +
Cancer Cures Exposed: Natural Medicine Revealed As The Answer
 False Claim #5 - Mammograms Are Saving Lives

Not true. All the cancer establishment can say for sure is that mammograms detect cancer. For breast cancer, the early
detection claim is a myth because at this stage it cannot be known whether the cancer will turn out to be benign or harmful.

Although there is no proof, the cancer establishment is more likely to say that the cancer will be harmful: Theres a lot of
money to be made from their offered treatment so biasing; erroneously concluding test positive results regularly occurs.

For instance, from a recent Swedish study involving some 60,000 women it was found that 70% of the cancer detected
mamographically were not tumours as claimed. They were in fact benign.

Incidentally, mammograms increase the chances of cancer because of the radiation effects. The safer, alternative option for
breast cancer screening is infra-red thermography.

False Claim #6 - GMOs Are Safe While Feeding The World With Higher Yields

Tainting ecosystems; chemical toxicity, destroying species, wreaking havoc on farmlands, creating superweeds giving rise
to superbugs and introducing unnatural factors into our food supplies the harmful effects of GM foods are beyond dispute.
For well over 50 years, the biotech industry has had one major misunderstanding: Its the idea that 1 gene codes for 1
protein. After completion of the Human Genome Project in the early part of this millennium it was shown that the 1 gene
codes for 1 protein theory had not been correct and was oversimplified.

Inserting one gene into a plants DNA has not just given rise to 1 protein but a number of other toxic rogue proteins landing
to illnesses for consumers of GM foods.

Not feeding the world and unnecessary GM foods have produced lower than anticipated yields.

False Claim #7 - Vaccines Are Safe And Effective

Officials of sorts making the blanket statement that vaccines are safe should be held morally and criminally responsible.
Consider the toxic overload children receive before the age of 6 years from some 30 plus different vaccinations (and ri$ing),
assaulting their developing immune systems, resulting in a number of illnesses or deaths.
Often associated with vaccination is the term immunization. This in fact is a misnomer. Vaccination is NOT
immunization and this needs to be legally and scientifically challenged.

Toxic, poisonous vaccines with their aluminium, mercury-based compounds, carboxylic acids, formaldehyde, protein foreign
bodies and the many other nasty little critters have counterproductive synergistic effects when injected into the
body: Thus, vaccines do the opposite to immunize, as immunity is not allowed to naturally develop.

Related: Mainstream Medicine Accidentally Handed Us Hard Core Backhanded Proof That Vaccines Cause Autism

False Claim #8 - Fluoride In The water Stops Tooth Decay

The claim that fluoride stops tooth decay is highly questionable with many contradictory findings. For example, tooth decay
in fluoridated countries is no different to non-fluoridated countries.
There have also been a number of studies to show that it is a nasty poison detrimental to health. Health institutions such as
the American Medical Association have allowed these shocking revelations go by unheeded.

Essentially fluoride - at a concentration a little as 1ppm disrupts our enzymes responsible for DNA repair by half
causing premature ageing and:

Affects our nervous and hormonal systems by denaturing (putting out of shape) our enzymes.

Lowers IQ

Is a carcinogen.

Affects thyroid function

May cause infertility

Causes fractured bones

Calcifies the pineal gland

Dont drink fluoridated tap water. Drink filtered water (e.g. reverse osmosis) instead.

False Claim #9 - High Cholesterol Means Youll Have A Heart Attack Imminently

Conventional medicine with the help of the mainstream medias fanfare and fear mongering has managed to pull the wool
over so many peoples eyes on this one.
The claim that high cholesterol means a heart attack is on its way is a myth that has made billions for Big Pharma from
statins drug sales as unnecessary treatment.

Contrary to popular belief:

Atherosclerotic plaque formations (narrowing or clogging of arteries) indicative of heart disease can manifest
regardless of blood cholesterol levels.

The body produces around 3 times more cholesterol than that from your diet. So a steady diet of low cholesterol
foods is highly unlikely to reduce your blood cholesterol.

Stains used to lower cholesterol have failed to reduce heart mortality and totally mortality rates.

Dont be a sucker for the great cholesterol deception.

False Claim #10 - The Symptoms Are The Cause Of Illness

No! The symptoms are just indicators or the knock-on effects of some underlying root cause.

Treat the symptoms and not address the root-cause then the illness will forever return.

More and more people are becoming aware that this is how conventional medicines Big Pharma drug treatment works and
why it is failing us while they make tons of money on returning customers who will never be cured

Sadly, indeed, many people are still clueless to this deception while getting even sicker due to the drugs side effects.

Related: Doctor Robert Scott Bell Explains The History Of Modern Medicine + Why Medical Researcher Calls
Doctors 'The Most Brainwashed People On The Planet'

Finally

Dont take for granted what health authorities are telling you or dont blindly go into agreement with the sheep-like
masses when it comes to health matters. Save yourself the unnecessary suffering or even death. Know that by
doing your own vigilant and careful research your health is in YOUR hands.

You can read more from Paul A. Philips at his site NewParadigm
How Far Has The Medical Profession Fallen From The Hippocratic Oath?
The Hippocratic Oath is one of the oldest binding documents in history. While the classical oath
calls for "the opposite" of pleasure and fame for those who transgress the oath, fewer than half of
oaths taken today insist the taker be held accountable for keeping the pledge.

Some doctors see oath-taking as little more than a pro-forma ritual with little value beyond that of upholding
tradition, but how far have modern Physicians come from the Hippocratic Oath as it was intended to protect
patients in doing no harm?

Related: Medical Deaths And The Corruption Of Healthcare

CTV recently reported that 1 in 18 experienced a potentially preventable injury while hospitalized. Of those, 1 in 5
experienced multiple harmful events during their stay. Kelly Kliewer was one of those affected. In 2004, she went in for
carpal tunnel surgery.

Once in surgery, though, the anesthesiologist gave her a paralytic instead of an anesthetic. According to Kliewer;

I stopped breathing, it paralyzed all my organs, went into respiratory distress and had to get put on a ventilator."

She is still seeing a psychologist for PTSD from the ordeal.

Intensive Care Medicine published a study on medical errors in 2001. Five American intensive care units hosting a total of
851 adult patients were reviewed. The study concluded, "Of 5,744 observations in 851 patients, 187 (3.3%) medication
administration errors were detected. the therapeutic classes most commonly associated with errors were vasoactive drugs
61 (32.6%) and sedative/analgesics 48 (25.7%)."
In 1999, the Institute of Medicine released a report called To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. In the report, it
was estimated that as many as 98,000 hospital deaths per year were a result of hospital errors.

While regulatory authorities sprang to action, putting reporting systems in place and trying to enforce accountability, some
recognized that the additional structures would not be enough. Physicians need to be aware of themselves so that errors
could be turned around quickly and patients would not suffer consequences.

This is the modern version of the Hippocratic Oath:

I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant:

I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such
knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow.

I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures which are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment
and therapeutic nihilism.

I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding
may outweigh the surgeon's knife or the chemist's drug.

I will not be ashamed to say "I know not," nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are
needed for a patient's recovery.

I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most
especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may
also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and
awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.

I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may
affect the person's family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care
adequately for the sick.
 I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.

I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those
sound of mind and body as well as the infirm.

If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter.
May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing
those who seek my help.

Sadly, the rise of the profit-driven pharmaceutical industry proves that this oath often falls by the wayside.

We must take responsibility for our own health.

Natural treatments that bring the body into balance are the best way to avoid damaging hospital visits.

Related: The NWO Depopulation Agenda Is The Only Explanation Why Expensive Mainstream Medicine Is Lethal

$340 Billion Per Year In US Healthcare Costs Linked To Chemicals Found In Plastic,
Detergents, Cosmetics And Toys
November 12 2016 | From: NaturalNews

A newly released report, published in the The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology has revealed that
exposure to hormone-disrupting chemicals is attributed to $340 billion in health costs each year in
the United States.
These endocrine-disrupting chemicals, or EDCs for short, are found in many everyday items that are used in
homes across the country. Plastic food containers, detergents, flame retardants, cosmetics and even toys for
children can be host to these damaging substances.

Related: Who knew? Many wines are contaminated with cancer-causing herbicide glyphosate

Some of the problems related to exposure to EDCs include neurological damage and behavioral problems such as attention
deficit/hyperactivty disorder (ADHD), autism and loss of IQ. The report suggests that these issues make up about 80 percent
of the problems caused by EDC exposure.

Of course, these are not the only health issues that are caused by EDCs. These chemicals, which are basically toxins, have
also been attributed to obesity, diabetes, cancer, male infertility, and endometriosis a painful condition characterized by
abnormal tissue growth outside of the uterus.

The economic impact of the harm caused by EDCs is also quite important. These costs add up to about two percent of the
United States' gross domestic product (GDP) each year a huge financial wound.

Related: 30 Reasons to Never Put Another M&M in Your Mouth Ever Again

The study's lead investigator Leonardo Trasande, an associate professor at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City,
said;

Our research adds to the growing evidence on the tremendous economic as well as human health costs of
endocrine-disrupting chemicals."

Trasande also commented that this issue has the potential to become a much more prominent health and economic
problem if no policy action is taken.

Endocrine tissue is essential to many of the body's functions. It produces many of the body's hormones that regulate energy
levels, reproduction, growth and development. The endocrine system also modulates our response to stress and injury; like
every other part of the body, it's clearly important.

What EDCs do is mimic natural hormones produced by the body, such as estrogen and androgen, and then lock onto the
receptors for those hormones within cells. This prevents the body's own hormones from binding to reception sites, and in
turn, creates a number of different potential health problems.
Related: Are Deodorants Really Dangerous?

Even the Environmental Protection Agency has recently come forward to admit that recent research has been raising a few
red flags about environmental contaminants, such as their potential to "disrupt the endocrine system leading to adverse-
health consequences."

Some of the most dangerous chemicals prevailing in the US are PBDEs, which are found in flame retardants. This class of
man-made substances is suspected of being one of the largest culprits behind human hormone interference. Flame
retardants and pesticides have both been associated with a loss in IQ points and are known to affect developing brains.

Bisphenol A, or BPA, which is found in plastic bottles, can linings and other products, has been subject to a lot of public
scrutiny and for good reason. Countless studies have linked it to a myriad of health problems, including changes in
metabolism and disruption of the reproductive and nervous systems.
Related: Leading Tea Brands Contain Illegal Levels Of Dangerous Pesticides

Phthalates are another ingredient of concern; these are often seen in plastics and other consumer goods, like cosmetics.
They make plastic more flexible and can also be used as suspension or stabilizing agent in solutions (like your lip gloss).
These are also attributed to a number of health problems, including reproductive issues.

Together, BPA and phthalates have racked up about $50 billion in health damages. Estimates suggest that the amount of
these chemicals circulating in the blood of an average American would be among the top 5 percent in Europeans.

These chemicals are not safe, and should be avoided even if our government won't do anything about them.

Related Articles:

KFCs Secret Ingredient Revealed: Its a Neurotoxin

10 Reasons Wheat Is Toxic Whether You are Gluten Sensitive or Not

Soylent food bars 'proudly made with GMOs' causing stomach problems, vomiting and diarrhea

WHO cancer agency under fire for withholding carcinogenic glyphosate documents

Canola oil: a chemical carcinogen that doesn't belong anywhere near your food

These 3 Foods are Banned in Other Countries - Avoid Them at All Costs

Cancer, Cancer Everywhere... But Not In The Elite's Presidential Suites

November 3 2016 | From: ActivistPost
A recent cancer symposium, with a surgical focus, met in Boston to discuss how surgical
oncology is experiencing an exciting evolution and the ways in which we treat cancer are
changing.

However, there are indications that the cure for cancer may have already been found and that those who have it are
keeping it close to their chests.

Related: The Man Who Discovered The Cause Of Cancer Wrote A Book On Curing It

In order to support this contention, which may be seen as alarming and extreme, one must look at the rates of cancer
among the general population and compare these to the rates of cancer deaths among world leaders.

And the latter is almost non-existent.

In the US, cancer is the second leading cause of death, exceeded only by heart disease. According to recently breaking
news, Australia now lists cancer as its leading cause of death. In the rest of the developed world, cancer is near the top of
the list.

A recent list published by the World Cancer Research Fund International shows that Denmark leads the pack in terms of
cancer rates.
Related: 5 Facts On Cancer That Conventional Medicine Is Now Aggressively Claiming Are Myths + Amish Have
Lower Rates Of Cancer, Ohio State Study Shows

Indeed, the list of the fifty countries with the highest cancer rates might lead one to believe that cancer is a disease of
prosperity. Conspicuously absent from the list are countries in the Third World - in particular Africa.

Cancer will fell approximately of all those living in the developed world. However, this particular manifestation of the Grim
Reaper gives world leaders a wide berth.

Since 1980, when the exiled Shah of Iran succumbed to lymphatic cancer in Egypt, the deaths by cancer of those leading
their nations can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And what is most telling about those on this short list is where they
stood on the political spectrum.
Related: Modern Life Is Killing Our Children: UK Cancer Rate In Young People Up 40% In 16 Years + 12 Things a
Cancer Doctor Should Never Say

Hugo Chavez, the colorful and controversial President of Venezuela between 1999-2013, was a Socialist and
prominent adversary of US foreign policy and neo-liberalism. Before succumbing to cancer in 2013, Chavez made a
much publicized radio announcement in which he speculated that the US government gave him cancer.

Chavez has been quoted as saying, Would it be so strange that theyve invented the technology to spread cancer and we
wont know about it for 50 years? He is also quoted as saying:

Fidel [Castro] always told me, Chvez take care. These people have developed technology. You are very
careless. Take care what you eat, what they give you to eat... a little needle and they inject you with I dont know
what.

Since his death Venezuela has crumbled into economic chaos.

Vaclav Havel, who was the last president of Czechoslovakia and the first President of the Czech Republic, is somewhat of a
more ambiguous character.

While he is seen as being a pivotal player in breaking up the Soviet bloc, and therefore bringing what is popularly termed
democracy to a formerly Communist country, he may have also been serving US and CIA interests, either unintentionally
or otherwise.

In his period of political dissidence, prior to ascending to power, Havel was imprisoned a number of times, the longest
incarceration being four years. As President, Havel was instrumental in dismantling the Warsaw Pact and expanding NATO
into Eastern European countries. Havel died of lung cancer in 2011 at the age of 75.
Related: Dangerous Products That Were Unknowingly Using In Our Day-To-Day Life + The Cancer Risk To People
Who Drink Chlorinated Water Is 93% Higher Than Those Who Dont

Jack Layton, the head of Canadas New Democratic Party, succumbed to an unspecified, newly diagnosed cancer in 2011.

The NDP occupies the furthest left of Canadas political spectrum. Indeed, there has never been an NDP head of state in
Canada.

So when the NDP swept the national parliamentary elections in 2011, winning 103 seats, the NDP became Canadas Official
Opposition. Laytons tenancy as head of the opposition was short lived, however. Layton succumbed to cancer less than
four months later, passing on in August of 2011.

He had been committed to ousting the conservative Harper government. Following Laytons death, the NDP tumbled from its
position and currently occupies third place in Canadas parliament.
Related: 5 Cancer Myths Busted

As Prime Minister of the tiny island of Barbados, David Thompson could only marginally have been considered a world
leader. The population of Barbados is less than 300,000, mostly black. Barbados, also known as Little England, is an
independent state with the British monarch as hereditary head of state.

Thompson was in office from 2008 until October of 2010, when he passed away from pancreatic cancer, one of the most
deadly forms of the Big C.

Statistically, since cancer is listed as cause of death in roughly of all deaths, one might logically expect that one quarter of
the US Presidents and one quarter of the US Vice Presidents, to pick one example, would have cancer listed as cause of
death.

With 44 Presidents and 47 Vice Presidents, one might think that somewhere in the realm of 24 or so might have
succumbed to cancer.

However, there are none. Zero. Zilch. A search for cancer as a cause of death for German, French or British leaders in the
past forty years produces only one name, that of former French President Francois Mitterrand, who succumbed to prostate
cancer in 1996 at the age of 80.
Related: Hospital Fires Leading Cancer Surgeon For Telling The Truth About Medical Establishment

Mitterrand was the first French President who was a Socialist and he led the nation for fourteen years, as its longest serving
President.

Since the 1972 throat cancer death of Edward VIII - who abdicated the throne in 1936 - no members of British
royalty have died of cancer.

In October of this year, the World Cancer Leaders Summit will be convening in Paris, France. The announcement for this
Summit states that The World Cancer Leaders Summit brings together global decision makers who can shape the way our
generation addresses the task of eliminating cancer as a life threatening disease for future generations.

Their announcement also states:

The Summit plays a pivotal role in this portfolio of global events by ensuring that the 2020 targets detailed in the
World Cancer Declaration are appropriately recognised and addressed at the highest political levels.

However, those at the highest political levels are often seen as escaping repercussions for criminal behavior and worse.
The idea of the Teflon-coated political elite is an idea that has now gained general - albeit grim - acceptance.

Given the probability that the cure may already exist, in light of the unusual lack of incidence of fatal cancers afflicting the
powerful, one might want to ask the Summit if the world leaders might be willing to share... please?

Related: The Truth About Cancer

Social Engineering - The War On The Higher Mind Of Humans: Heres Why You Should
Consider Converting Your Music To A=432 Hz
November 1 2016 | From: CollectiveEvolution

If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and
vibration. - Nikola Tesla

What we have called matter is energy, whose vibration has been so lowered as to be perceptible to the senses.
There is no matter. Albert Einstein

Related: The A=432 Hz Frequency: DNA Tuning And The Bastardisation Of Music

Tesla said it. Einstein agreed. Science proved it. It is a known fact that everythingincluding our own bodiesis made up of
energy vibrating at different frequencies. That being said, it seems logical to wonder, can sound frequencies affect us?

It would appear that this is the case. Frequencies affect frequencies, much like mixing ingredients with other ingredients
affects the overall flavour of a meal. The way frequencies affect the physical world has been demonstrated through various
experiments, such as the science of Cymatics and water memory.

Cymatics illustrate that when sound frequencies move through a particular medium such as water, air, or sand, they directly
alter the vibration of matter. Below are pictures demonstrating how particles adjust to different frequencies. (Click here to
watch a video demonstrating the patterns of sound frequencies)
Water memory also illustrates how our own intentions may even alter the material world. This has been demonstrated by
Dr. Masaru Emoto, who has performed studies showing how simple intentions through sound, emotions, and thoughts can
dramatically shape the way water crystallizes.

We all hold a certain vibrational frequency, and our bodies are estimated to be about 70% water. Given the above
experiments, it stands to reason that musical frequencies could also alter our own vibrational state.

Every expression through sound, emotion, or thought holds a specific frequency which influences everything around it -
much like a single drop of water can create a larger ripple effect in a large body of water.

Music Frequency

With this concept in mind, let us bring our attention to the frequency of the music we listen to. Most music worldwide has
been tuned to A=440 Hz since the International Standards Organization (ISO) promoted it in 1953.

However, when looking at the vibratory nature of the universe, its possible that this pitch is disharmonious with the natural
resonance of nature and may generate negative effects on human behaviour and consciousness.
Some theories (although unproven) even suggest that the Nazi regime had been in favor of adopting this pitch as standard
after conducting scientific research to determine which range of frequencies best induce fear and aggression.

Whether or not the conspiracy is factual, interesting studies have pointed towards the benefits of tuning music to A=432 Hz
instead.

Mathematics of The Universe

432 Hz is said to be mathematically consistent with the patterns of the universe. It is said that 432 Hz vibrates with the
universes golden mean PHI and unifies the properties of light, time, space, matter, gravity and magnetism with biology, the
DNA code, and consciousness.

When our atoms and DNA start to resonate in harmony with the spiralling pattern of nature, our sense of connection to
nature is said to be magnified. The number 432 is also reflected in ratios of the sun, Earth, and moon, as well as the
precession of the equinoxes, the Great Pyramid of Egypt, Stonehenge, and the Sri Yantra, among many other sacred sites.

From my own observations, some of the harmonic overtone partials of A=432hz 12T5 appear to line up to natural
patterns and also the resonance of solitons. Solitons need a specific range to form into the realm of density and
span from the micro to the macro cosmos. Solitons are not only found in water mechanics, but also in the ion-
acoustic breath between electrons and protons.

Brian T. Collins
Color Spectrum Resonance

Another interesting factor to consider is that the A=432 Hz tuning correlates with the color spectrum and chakra system,
while the A=440 Hz does not.

The Solar Spectrum & The Cosmic Keyboard

All of the frequencies in the spectrum are related in octaves, from gamma rays to subharmonics. These colors and
notes are also related to our Chakras and other important energy centers. I

f we are to understand that Chakras are connected to the Seven Rays of the Solar Spectrum, then the notes and
frequencies we use for the same should be the same.

A432 Hz is the tuning of the Cosmic Keyboard or Cosmic Pitchfork, as opposed to the A440 Hz modern standard.
It places C# at 136.10 Hz Om, which is the main note of the Sitar in classical Indian music and the pitch of the
chants of the Tibetan monks, who tell us, It comes from nature.'

Dameon Keller

Exploring The Difference

Lets explore the experiential difference between A=440 Hz and A=432 Hz. Music lovers and musicians have noticed that
music tuned in A=432 Hz is not only more beautiful and harmonious to the ears, but it also induces a more inward
experience that is felt inside the body at the spine and heart.

Music tuned in A=440 Hz was felt as a more outward and mental experience, and was felt at the side of the head which
projected outwards.
Audiophiles have also stated that A=432hz music seems to be non-local and can fill an entire room, whereas A=440hz can
be perceived as directional or linear in sound propagation.

The ancients tuned their instruments at an A of 432 Hz instead of 440 Hz and for a good reason. There are
plenty of music examples on the internet that you can listen to, in order to establish the difference for yourself.
Attuning the instrument to 432 Hz results in a more relaxing sound, while 440 Hz slightly tenses up to body.

This is because 440 Hz is out of tune with both macrocosmos and microcosmos. 432 Hz on the contrary is in tune.
To give an example of how this is manifested microcosmically: our breath (0,3 Hz) and our pulse (1,2 Hz) relate to
the frequency of the lower octave of an A of 432 Hz (108 Hz) as 1:360 and 1:90.

innergarden.org

The overall sound difference was noticeable, the 432 version sounding warmer, clearer and instantly sounded
more listenable but the 440 version felt tighter, with more aggressive energy.

Anonymous guitarist

The video below was created by someone with no opinion on whether A=432 Hz or A=440 Hz is better. Therefore,
the way both versions of the melody is played is unbiased. It is up to us to tune in and feel which one feels more
harmonious to us!

Heres another example:

David Helpling Sticks and Stones in 440 hz

David Helpling Sticks and Stones in 432 hz

Personal Thoughts

I personally have enjoyed many bands, artists, and styles of music even though they were tuning in A=440 hz, however,
after comparing a few songs in both A=432 hz and A=440 hz I can say I definitely feel and hear the difference.

I wouldnt say that my experience of 440hz music has turned me into an aggressive person, but I can understand how an
entire population being exposed to music that is more mind directed as opposed to heart directed - not to mention all of the
materialistic and ego-driven lyrics in most popular music - is a perfect combination to maintain a more discordant frequency
and state of consciousness within humanity.

This is, of course, simply my own opinion.

Music based on C=128hz (C note in concert A=432hz) will support humanity on its way towards spiritual freedom.
The inner ear of the human being is built on C=128 hz. Rudolph Steiner

I cannot state with complete certainty that every idea suggested in this article is 100% accurate, nor am I an expert on the
subject. I simply gathered interesting information from others who researched this issue more deeply.

For this reason, if we are looking for scientific validation for these claims, I suggest that we each do our own research on the
matter with an open yet discerning mind. Perhaps more research on this topic will be done in the near future to help explain
the phenomenon.

I believe we all possess intuition and the ability to observe without judgment, which can be more useful than resorting to
ridicule when exposed to information that has not yet been accepted by the scientific community.

It is therefore up to us to tone down the urge to jump to conclusions and instead EXPERIENCE the difference between
A=440 Hz and A=432 Hz. To do so, we need to listen with our entire body and a neutral awareness as opposed to with our
mental ideas, judgments, and preconceptions.

If you are interested in changing your musics pitch to A=432 hz, click here to learn how to do it.
The Truth About Addiction And Recovery
November 1 2016 | From: Peele / Various

A radical new approach to recovery - using methods proven more effective than medical treatment
or twelve-step programs.

Drawing on the latest research and detailed case studies, the authors expose the best-kept secrets in the recovery
field:

Addictions - whether to food, cigarettes, sex, alcohol, or drugs - are not diseases, and theyre not necessarily
lifelong problems.

Many more people give up addictions on their own than are helped by medical treatment or twelve-step
programs.

Developing values, skills, and life resources enables people to quit addictions - and to shed the addict identity
altogether.

In their revolutionary Life Process Program for overcoming all kinds of addictions, the authors emphasize self-help and
treatment through coping with stress and achieving ones goals. As helpful as it is controversial, The Truth About Addiction
and Recovery will forever change the way we view and treat addiction.

A classic. - John Norcross, PhD, ABPP, Distinguished Professor of Psychology at the University of Scranton and
author of Changing for Good
Addiction

What causes addiction? Easy, right? Drugs cause addiction. But maybe it is not that simple.

This video is adapted from Johann Hari's New York Times best-selling book 'Chasing The Scream: The First and Last Days
of the War on Drugs.'

For more information, and to take a quiz to see what you know about addiction, visit chasingthescream.com

An interactive version of this video click here.

Why It Doesnt Make Sense To Call Addiction A Disease

We frequently hear from people who say: I drink too much sometimes, but I dont think Im an alcoholic. And I dont want to
stand up and talk about myself in front of a group. Is there any other way I can change the way I drink?

Im overweight, but I understand that people are born to be fat and theres not much you can do about it. I know
Ive tried to lose weight a million times and failed. Does this mean Im doomed to be overweight?

I saw an ad saying the only way to lick your addiction to nicotine is by going to a doctor. Is that really true? Dont
people ever quit smoking on their own?

My father was an alcoholic. Does that mean Im likely to become an alcoholic myself? Should I play it safe and
quit drinking altogether? A friend of mine joined a Children of Alcoholics group, even though shes never even
been drunk. Should I join such a group? And what about my kids?

My son was caught smoking marijuana. Now Im told that, unless I place him in an expensive residential
treatment program, he could escalate his drug use and die. I dont have the money for this but, of course, if I have
to save his life Ill mortgage the house!

People are much concerned about bad habits (which sometimes reach life-consuming proportions) that theyd like to do
something about-drinking, smoking, overeating, taking drugs, gambling, overspending, or even compulsive romancing.

We hear more and more that every one of these things is a disease, and that we must go to treatment centers or join twelve-
step support groups like Alcoholics Anonymous in order to change any of these behaviors.
Apparently the 12 step plan concept was taken from the Satanic Bible

Is there really no other way to change a powerful habit than to enter treatment for a disease? Do personal initiative,
willpower, or just maturing and developing a more rewarding life have anything to do with peoples ability to overcome
addictive habits?

As children, as spouses, as parents, as employers, as consumers, and as citizens we must struggle to understand and
master the destructive potential of drugs, alcohol, and related addictions.

The kinds of questions so many people face today include: What do we do if we discover our children are smoking
marijuana, or worse? Should we put them in a treatment center that will teach them they are chemically dependent for life?

How can we tell if co-workers, employees, and friends are secretly addicts or alcoholics? What is the most appropriate way
to react to people who drink too much or do anything that harms themselves and others?
Click on the image above to open a larger versioj in a new window

Furthermore, as a society, how should we deal with these problems? Are our incessant wars on drugs really going to have
the positive impact the generals in these wars always claim? Or is there some more sensible or direct way to reduce the
damage people do to themselves through their uncontrollable habits?

Rather than arrest drug users, can we treat addicts so that they stop using drugs? And if we expand the treatment for all the
addictions we have seen - like shopping and smoking and overeating and sexual behavior - who will pay for all this
treatment?

Finally, does addiction diminish peoples judgment so that they cant be held accountable for their behavior, or for crimes
and financial excesses they commit while addicted?

This book is for those concerned with such questions. But what you will read here is not the same as what you see and hear
in newspapers and magazines, on television, in addiction treatment centers, in twelve-step groups, and in most physicians
and therapists offices or what your children are learning in school.
Related: US govt. suppressing herb that can protect your liver from alcohol damage: NTX

For in its desperate search for a way out of the convulsions caused by drug abuse and addiction, our society has seized
upon a simple, seductive, but false answer that this book disputes. What we say is, indeed, so different from most things you
hear that we have provided extensive documentation at the back of the book.

The simple but incorrect answer we constantly hear is expressed by the familiar statement, Alcoholism is a disease. In
other words, we can treat away these problems in a medical setting.

This viewpoint has proved so appealing that it has been adopted by professional organizations and government agencies as
well as by groups like Alcoholics Anonymous. And now the disease label is applied not only to alcoholism, drug addiction,
cigarette smoking, and overeating, but also to gambling, compulsive shopping, desperate romantic attachments, and even
committing rape or killing ones newborn child!

A.A.s image of powerlessness over alcohol is being extended to everything that people feel they are unable to
resist or control.
But what lies behind the claim that alcoholism and other addictions are diseases? How accurate is it? What evidence
supports it? Most important, what good does it do us to believe it? Will it really help you or someone you care about to
overcome an addiction?

This book will show that the answer is no - that, in fact, it may do more harm than good. Whats wrong with calling a
tenacious and destructive habit a disease?

Three things:

1. It isnt true.

2. It doesnt help most people (even those it does help might succeed just as well in a less costly, less limiting
way).

3. It prevents us from doing things that really would help.

In this chapter we will summarize what the disease model says, why it is wrong, and why it is harmful. As you will see, there
is no good reason to label yourself or people you know as forever marked by an addictive disease. Challenging this
useless folklore is the first step toward understanding addiction and doing something about it.
Visit: lifeprocessprogram.com

Then we will present an alternative way of thinking about and dealing with addiction called the Life Process Program. The
accompanying table previews the major differences between the Life Process Program and the disease model of addiction.

Myths Versus Reality

To highlight some of the surprising facts we will reveal, here are some common beliefs about various addictions:

A person needs medical treatment or a program like Smokenders to quit smoking.

Attending Alcoholics Anonymous meetings is the most effective way for alcoholics to stop drinking.

Nearly all regular cocaine users become addicted.

Very few people who have a drinking problem can ever drink in a normal, controlled manner.

Drunk drivers who undergo treatment for alcoholism are less likely to repeat the offense than those who receive
normal judicial penalties such as license suspension.

Most people with an alcoholic parent become alcoholics themselves.

Most people who are binge drinkers in their twenties go on to become alcoholics.

Most of the American soldiers who were addicted to heroin in Vietnam remained addicted or became addicted
again after they returned home.

The fact that alcoholism runs in families means that it is an inherited disease.

Fat children, because they have inherited their obesity, are more likely to be fat in later life than are people who
become fat as adults.

Actually, the best scientific evidence available today indicates that none of these statements is true. Such specific
misconceptions grow out of a foundation of false assumptions about the nature of addiction generally.
 Ten Assumptions that Distinguish the Life Process Program from the Disease Model

DISEASE MODEL LIFE PROCESS PROGRAM

1. Addiction is inbred and biological. 1. Addiction is a way of coping with yourself and your world.

2. The solution is medical treatment and membership in 2. The solution requires self-awareness, new coping skills,
spiritual groups such as A.A. and changing your environment.

3. Addiction is all-or-nothing; you are or you arent an 3. Addiction is a continuum; your behavior is more or less
addict. addicted.

4. Addiction is permanent and you can relapse at any 4. Addiction can be outgrown.
moment.

5. Addicts are in denial and must be forced to 5. You should identify problems and solutions in ways that
acknowledge they have a disease. work for you.

6. The recovering addict / alcoholic is the expert on 6. Those without an addiction problem are the best models.
addiction.

7. Addiction is a primary disease. 7. Addiction stems from other life problems you have.

8. Your main associates must be other recovering 8. You should associate with a normal range of people.
addicts.

9. You must accept the disease philosophy to recover. 9. Getting better is not a matter of believing a dogma.

10. Surrendering to a higher power is the key to 10. You must develop your own power to get better.
recovery.

Related: Stop the Madness: Coming off Psych Meds

What Is the Disease Model of Addiction?

At first, it seems hard to understand what is meant by saying that something a person regularly does (such as drinking
alcohol) is a disease.

Habitual, voluntary behavior of this sort does not resemble what we normally think of as a disease, like cancer or diabetes.
What is more, A.A. - and even hospital programs for alcoholism - dont actually treat any biological causes of
alcoholism.

After all the claims we have heard in the past decade about biological discoveries concerning alcoholism, not one of these
findings has been translated into a usable treatment. Instead, the same group discussions and exhortations that have been
used for the last fifty years are employed in hospital programs.

Nor is any biological method used to determine whether someone is an alcoholic other than by assessing how much that
person drinks and the consequences of this drinking.
And if we have no special biological information about treating or identifying alcoholism, we surely know nothing about the
biological causes of diseases such as compulsive gambling, shopping, and loving, which have nothing to do with drugs or
alcohol.

There is, however, a standard way those who claim addiction is a disease describe addictive diseases. This description has
been developed by groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous, by the medical profession, and by various popularizers of the
idea that alcoholism is a disease.

What they say is in every regard wrong.

When they tell you that you have the disease of alcoholism, chemical dependency, obesity, compulsive
shopping, or whatever, this is what they mean:

The basis of the disease is inbred and/or biological. There is no need to look for the causes of the disease in your
personal problems, the people you spend time with, the situations you find yourself in, or your ethnic or cultural background.
Addiction is bred into you from birth or early childhood. Your current experience of life has nothing to do with it; nothing you
can do makes you either more or less likely to become addicted.

It involves complete loss of control over your behavior. Once involved in your addiction, you are utterly at its mercy.
You cannot choose whether, or how much, to lose yourself in the involvement. No matter how costly it may be in a given
situation, you will go all the way. You cannot make reasonable, responsible choices about something to which you are
addicted.

Addictions are forever. An addictive disease is like diabetes - it stays with you as long as you live. The mysterious bodily
or psychic deficiency that lies at the root of addiction can never be remedied, and you can never safely expose yourself to
the substance to which you were addicted. Once an addict, always an addict.

It inevitably expands until it takes over and destroys your life. Irreversible progression is a hallmark of addictive
diseases as they are conceived today. The addiction grows and grows until it devours you, like AIDS or cancer. No rewards,
no punishments, not even the most momentous developments in your life can stay its course, unless you completely swear
off the addictive substance or activity.

If you say you dont have it, thats when they really know you have it. According to this Catch22 of the disease
theory, anyone suspected of having an addictive disease who insists that he or she doesnt have the disease is guilty of the
added offense of denial. In this way, the disease label is like a web that traps a person more firmly the harder the person
fights to get out of it.

It requires medical and/or spiritual treatment. Thinking you can cure your addiction through willpower, changes in
your life circumstances, or personal growth is a delusion (like denial), according to disease-theory proponents. Addiction is a
disease of the body that can be controlled only by never-ending medical treatments.

It is also a disease of the soul requiring lifetime membership in a support group like Alcoholics Anonymous. Why supposed
medical treatment consists mainly of going to group meetings and why people cant develop their own spiritual approaches
to life if they choose are questions disease theory adherents ignore.

Your kids are going to get it, too. Since addiction is an inherited disease, the children of addicts are considered at high
risk for developing the same disease - no matter what you or they do or how careful you are. Logical deductions from this
viewpoint are that you should have your kids tested for their genetic predisposition to alcoholism or addiction before they
start school, or that you should simply teach them never to touch a drop of alcohol or expose themselves to whatever your
addiction is.

Obviously, this approach presents special difficulties in dealing with addictions to eating, shopping, and making love. Where
did these notions come from - notions that, when examined in the clear light of day, often seem quite bizarre and contrary to
common experience?

The disease theory takes a set of precepts that were made up by and about a small group of severe, long-term alcoholics in
the 1930s and applies them inappropriately to people with a wide range of drinking and other life problems. The original
members of Alcoholics Anonymous, realizing they would soon die if they did not give up alcohol, adopted wholesale the
dogma of the nineteenth century temperance movement.

The one major difference was that the A.A. members said drinking was a disease only for them, and not for everyone who
drank - therefore not everyone needed to eschew demon rum, as temperance advocates had insisted.

Niacin for Treatment of Depression & Alcoholism

 When he co-founded Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) to offer a support group for those addicted to alcohol, Bill Wilson
made the first major advance in addressing alcoholism.

A fact which is less well-known is that Bill Wilson also made the second major advance when he became aware of,
and later promoted the use of niacin vitamin B3 as a treatment for chronic drinkers.

Orthomolecular Medicine and Alcoholism

Even as Alcoholics Anonymous slowly expanded, many of Bill Wilson's personal and financial problems lingered,
especially his depression.

Canadian biochemist Dr. Abram Hoffer, M.D., Ph.D., a psychiatrist and physician, writes: "I met Bill in New York in
1960. Humphry Osmond and I introduced him to the concept of megavitamin therapy. Bill was very curious about it
and began to take niacin, 3,000 mg daily. Within a few weeks fatigue and depression which had plagued him for
years were gone."

Dr. Hoffer, in his foreword to the book "Alcoholism: The Cause and The Cure", describes how he and Bill Wilson
investigated together the effect of Niacin vitamin B3 on alcoholics.

Dr Hoffer writes: Bill understood it first hand, for even though he had been abstinent for many years, he was still
unwell. He suffered from immense anxiety, tension, and fatigue, but was able to function in spite of what might
have been disabling.

After taking 3 grams of niacin daily for two weeks, his symptoms vanished and he remained free of addiction. This
was a peak experience that he never forgot. He became determined to give as many AA members as possible the
benefit of the same healing vitamin,.

Dr. Hoffer further writes: Without telling me that he was doing so, Bill conducted a trial of niacin on 30 friends and
colleagues in New York. Most of them were very productive and sober members of AA, but they all suffered from
the common mind and mood afflictions that people formerly addicted to alcohol experience, even when they are
not drinking.

After three months he showed me his data. After one month, ten of the subjects were well. After the second month
another ten had recovered, and the remaining one-third had shown no improvement after the third month. By this
time I had also treated a number of people addicted to alcohol and had seen similar recoveries.

Beyond AA Meetings

Between 1960 and his death in 1971, Bill Wilson shared this information with physician members of AA in a series
of 3 brochures, Communications to Alcoholics Anonymous.

Bills findings were unfortunately dismissed by the AAs International Board, because he was not an "M.D." and the
fact that Alcoholics Anonymous is a social support structure, not a medical treatment provider.

Related: DEA Just Banned a Natural Plant that Can Cure Opioid Addiction - Proving Loyalty to Big Pharma

The A.A. model has struck a responsive chord among Americans. Obviously, with the rejection of Prohibition, the United
States had decided against a national policy that everyone should abstain from drinking.

Yet Westernn society continues even today to show a deep unease about alcohol and about intoxication, which many
people seek even while fearing its disturbing effects. Given this national ambivalence, we have been drawn to the old-time
religion of temperance, as represented by A.A., now cloaked in the modern language of medicine and the neurosciences.
But, as this book will make clear, the operative assumptions about addiction have never arisen directly from biological
sciences. Rather, they have been superimposed on scientific research, much of which directly contradicts the assumptions
of the disease theory.

Why the Disease Model Is Wrong

Every major tenet of the disease view of addiction is refuted both by scientific research and by everyday observation. This
is true even for alcoholism and drug addiction, let alone the many other behaviors that plainly have little to do with biology
and medicine.

No biological or genetic mechanisms have been identified that account for addictive behavior.

Even for alcoholism, as the following chapter will show, the evidence for genetic inheritance is unconvincing. By now,
probably every well-informed reader has heard announcements that scientists have discovered a gene that causes
alcoholism.
In fact, as one of us wrote in The Atlantic, this is far from the case, and the study that prompted these claims has already
been refuted by another study in the same journal. Moreover, if a gene were found to influence alcoholism, would the same
gene cause drug addiction?

Would it be related to smoking? Would it also cause compulsive gambling and overeating? If so, this would mean that
everyone with any of these addictions has this genetic inheritance. Indeed, given the ubiquity of the problems described, the
person without this inheritance would seem to be the notable exception.

How could an addiction like smoking be genetic? Why are some types of people more likely to smoke than others (about
half of waitresses and car salesmen smoke, compared with about a tenth of lawyers and doctors)?

And does believing that an addiction like smoking is genetic help the person quit (are all those smokers who quit not
genetically addicted)?
Returning to alcohol, are people really predestined biologically to become alcoholics and thus to become A.A. members?
Think about the rock group Aerosmith: all five members of this group now belong to A.A., just as they once all drank and
took drugs together.

How unlikely a coincidence it is that five unrelated people with the alcoholic / addictive inheritance should run into one
another and form a band!

The idea that genes make you become alcoholic cannot possibly help us understand how people develop drinking problems
over years, why they choose on so many occasions to go out drinking, how they become members of heavy-drinking
groups, and how drinkers are so influenced by the circumstances of their lives.

Genes may make a person unusually sensitive to the physiological effects of alcohol; a person can find drinking extremely
relaxing or enjoyable; but this says nothing about how the person drinks over the course of a lifetime.

After all, some people say, I never have more than one or two drinks at a time, because alcohol goes straight to my head.

As we document here and in the following chapter, we can actually predict the likelihood of peoples becoming addicted far
more reliably from their nationality and social class, from the social groups they join, and from their beliefs and expectations
about alcohol or drugs (or other activities), than from their biological makeup.

Often, people who become addicted set themselves up by investing a substance or an experience with magical powers to
transform their beings (Getting drunk is great; When I drink Im really at ease; Drinking makes me attractive to people of
the opposite sex).

It is simply not within the chemical properties of alcohol or a drug, or the experience of an activity like shopping, to offer
people what they want and seek from an addiction.

People find this in an addiction when they believe they cant achieve the feelings they need in ordinary ways. Clearly,
attitudes, values, and the opportunities available in a persons environment have much to do with whether the person has a
significant risk for a particular addiction.

People do not necessarily lose control of themselves whenever they are exposed to the object of their addiction.
On the contrary, many practice their addictions quite selectively. For example, military and religious personnel are often
deprived of tobacco during training or on retreats, and business people realize they cant smoke in certain rooms.
Orthodox Jews who smoke heavily abstain from smoking on the Sabbath, showing that their religious values mean more to
them than nicotine does. Alcoholics in experiments routinely control their drinking when it is in their interest to do so - say,
when they must leave a cozy room with television and companionship in order to get more to drink.

These variations occur in real life just as they do in the laboratory - for example, when people avoid drugs or cigarettes
when they are with people who wont tolerate those habits. When something they really care about is jeopardized if they
continue to drink, smoke, or whatever, most people will stop or cut down accordingly.

Addiction usually does not last a lifetime. Once an addict, always an addict is a pessimistic notion that is both wrong
and harmful. It leaves people two choices: either you stay constantly addicted and miserable until you die; or you abstain for
life while attending group meetings and viewing yourself as the perpetually recovering person.

Sadly, a small number of people do die of their addictions; and another group succeeds in quitting drinking, drug taking, or
whatever by maintaining the role of the recovering addict.

But most people are more resilient and resourceful than that. Most people who have addictive habits moderate or
eliminate these habits over the course of their lives.
And they do it without having to say I am an alcoholic or I am an overeater or I am a sex addict as long as they live.

Remember that, today, a majority of adults who have ever smoked have quit and nearly all did so without
treatment.

Progression is not inevitable - it is the exception. If the majority of people give up addictive habits, then the idea of
inevitable progression doesnt hold water. Calling addiction a progressive disease comes from looking at the few
who have progressed to severe addiction and tracing the path by which they got there.

The progression of addictive problems only seems inevitable after the fact. For example, the great majority of college
overdrinkers, even those who black out at fraternity parties, become moderate drinkers in middle age.

When you consider that even most of the people who use narcotics and cocaine do not end up addicted, you can see that
drug-and-alcohol use patterns are many and varied, even when a person uses a substance abusively for a time.

Treatment is no panacea. Contrary to all the advertising we hear, treatment for addictions is often no more effective than
letting addiction and recovery take their natural course.

The vast majority of people who have given up addictions (beginning with more than 90 percent of the forty-four million
Americans who have quit smoking have done so on their own.
This does not mean that treatment for addictions cannot work - research has shown that some forms of treatment are
effective. But the ones that are more effective are not the ones that have become popular in the United States.

You can outgrow an addictive habit on your own or in therapy, but either way the principles of the Life Process Program are
the same.

What about joining support groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous? Here, too, research reveals the opposite of what we
have been led to believe. A.A is a valuable community resource for those who find support in a certain type of religiously
oriented group ritual.

But the best we can say about A.A is that it works for those for whom it works. Meanwhile, there are plenty for whom it
doesnt work. There is no scientific evidence that A.A. works better than other approaches when randomly selected
alcoholics are assigned to A.A. or other treatments.

In fact, the evidence is that the people who are now often compelled to attend A.A - after being arrested for drunk driving or
being sent by a company Employee Assistance Program - do worse than those who are left on their own.
Related: Benzos: A Dance With the Devil

How can we reconcile this finding with the glowing testimonials we hear about A.A.? The people we see in A.A. are the ones
who like it, find it helpful, and stick it out. But there are many others who dont go to A.A. or who dont like it and drop out.

And as we show below, those who seriously try to stop drinking on their own are more likely to maintain their abstinence
than those who attend A.A.

In addition, since many more people try to quit on their own than through therapy or joining a group, the number of self-
curers is triple or more the number of successful treatment or A.A cases.

But such self-curers are not very visible, because they are individuals without an organized group to publicize their success.

These, then, are the key fallacies of the popularly held view of addiction. Even generally well-informed people may be
astonished that we contradict such widely held beliefs. All of our refutations of conventional wisdom are carefully
documented in the notes at the back of the book.

But you dont need to read scholarly articles and scientific reports to test the accuracy of what we say. Just check it out
against your own experience and observation. Dont you know anyone who used to drink excessively, at times
uncontrollably, but who no longer drinks at all or now drinks in a normal, appropriate manner?
Obviously, most people who used to drink excessively but who have now cut back (or even quit) do not attend meetings
where they must rise and declare, I am an alcoholic.

How many people of all ages do you know who quit smoking? How many of them did it by going through a medical program
or joining a support group, and how many finally just decided to quit and made good on that resolve? What happened to all
the people you knew who used illegal drugs in college, some quite heavily?

How many of them are chemically dependent now? If we simply examine the cases of most of those we are close to
personally, we will see how addictions usually do not follow the disease course.

Why the Disease Model Doesnt Work - Why It Even Does More Harm than Good

The assumption that calling addiction a disease actually helps people crumbles when subjected to critical scrutiny. Some
people feel comfortable thinking of their addiction as a disease and are able to function better on this basis for a time.

But whatever short-term benefits medical, disease-oriented treatment produces are double-edged even for the individuals
who claim it has helped them. Many of the most successful recipients of disease treatment might achieve a real
breakthrough by learning to think about addiction differently.
Related: Why Social Isolation Leads to Inflammation

Meanwhile, for the majority of people, the disadvantages of the disease approach clearly outweigh the advantages from the
start.

The disadvantages of the disease approach are that it:

Attacks peoples feelings of personal control and can thus become a self-fulfilling prophecy;

Makes mountains out of molehills, since it fails to differentiate between the worst alcoholics and addicts and
those with minor substance-use dependence;

Stigmatizes people - in their own minds - for life

Iinterrupts normal maturation for the young, for whom this approach is completely inappropriate;

Holds up as models for drinking and drug use the people who have shown the least capacity to manage their
lives;

Isolates alcoholism and addiction as problems from the rest of the alcoholics or addicts life;

Limits peoples human contacts primarily to other recovering alcoholics or addicts, who only reinforce their
preoccupation with drinking and drug use;

Dispenses a rigid program of therapy that is founded - in the words of the director of the governments National
Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIA.A.A) - on hunch, not evidence, and not on science, while
attacking more effective therapies.

How can therapy that so many people believe in and swear by actually do more harm than good? To illustrate this point,
consider the case of a famous psychiatrist who evaluated his hospitals alcoholism program - one he felt was among the
most outstanding in the world.

This program first detoxified the alcoholic in the hospital, then mandated A.A. attendance, and finally actively followed
patients progress with an outreach counseling program.
When the psychiatrist running the program, Dr. George Vaillant, evaluated how well his patients were doing two years and
eight years after treatment, however, he found they had fared about as well as comparable alcoholics who received no
treatment at all!

How could Vaillant have been so wrong as to think his patients were doing phenomenally well, when actually they were
doing no better than if he had left them alone completely?

Naturally, he wanted to think it worked. But his research prevented his rose-colored views from distorting the actual results
of his treatment.

When he counted all his patients, not just his successes, when he scrutinized and verified what they were telling him in
order to see exactly how well they were doing, and when he compared them with alcoholics out on their own instead of just
assuming that all these people died without the help of treatment like his, Vaillant found that his expensive hospital
treatment was close to useless.

Very few people in the treatment industry or in A.A. are as scrupulous as is Vaillant. When we hear from A.A. boosters, they
tell us only about those who have stuck with the program and are currently sober. The same is true of treatment programs.
They parade their best stars up front.

We dont hear about all their failures. Yet Vaillant, in a book that is cited as the major source of support for the benefits of
treating alcoholics according to the disease model, concluded as follows:

If treatment as we currently understand it does not seem more effective than the natural healing processes, then
we need to understand those healing processes better.

Indeed, Vaillant repeats another researchers conclusion that it may be easier for improper treatment to retard recovery
than for proper treatment to hasten it.major source of support for the benefits of treating alcoholics according to the disease
model
What are the dangers of this kind of disease treatment? Here are explanations of the disadvantages listed at the beginning
of this section:

It sets people up for failure. All disease treatments emphasize how much out of control patients are, and what a delusion
it is for them to feel they can exert any control over their addictions. Is it possible that such a message can do more harm
than good?

William Miller and Reid Hester, reviewing all the comparative studies on treatment for alcoholism, made a surprising
finding: in the only two studies in which alcoholics were randomly assigned either to A.A., to other forms of
treatment, or to no treatment, those assigned to A.A. did no better or actually suffered more relapse than those who
received other treatment or who werent treated at all!

Intrigued by this outcome, one of us wrote George Vaillant and asked him whether subjects he studied who abstained
without entering formal treatment did better if they joined A.A. Again, A.A. members were less likely to maintain their
abstinence.

Why would people be more likely to relapse if they entered A.A. than if they quit drinking on their own? There are several
reasons. For one, people who enter A.A. are told they cannot succeed on their own. Therefore, if they should stop attending
A.A., many are convinced that they will soon resume alcoholic drinking.

A.A. and disease treatments are especially defeatist in dealing with relapse. Accepting the disease-oriented philosophy of
inevitable loss of control thus makes it more likely that the alcoholic will binge if he or she ever has a drink. Yet, Vaillant
found, nearly all alcoholics will drink again at some time.

It makes matters worse than they are. Can attending A.A. or going into addiction treatment really cause people to develop
some of their alcoholism symptoms? In his book Becoming Alcoholic, sociologist David Rudy reports on the time he spent
observing A.A. meetings.

Rudy found that most people had to learn their role as alcoholics. An important rite of passage is the first time members tell
their story for the group, beginning by acknowledging, I am an alcoholic. In Rudys words;

The alcoholics tale is made up of two parts: a story about how bad it was before A.A. and a story about how
good it is now.
Narcotics anonymous is the drug users version of AA, although is generally accepting of AA members as well

Related: The Truth About Drugs

This presentation is warmly greeted by the members sponsor in A.A., and the entire membership responds with enthusiastic
acceptance of the convert.

When alcoholics introduce their experiences and symptoms in or treatment, the group or therapist homogenizes them
through interpretation and clarification. For example, most people who enter have not had blackouts, which are more typical
of long-term alcoholics than of the younger drinkers now flooding into treatment and A.A.

But blackouts are taken as the badge of alcoholism, and according to Rudy, members learn the importance of blackouts as
a behavior that verifies their alcoholism, and an indeterminable number of members who may not have had blackouts report
them. Rudy continues:

"When newcomers to A.A. claim that they cannot remember if they had any blackouts or not, other members use
this claim as evidence of the event in question. As one member put it to a newcomer:

The reason you cant remember is because alcohol fogs your brain. If it fogs your brain now after not drinking for a
few days it must have fogged your brain before. See, you must have had blackouts then.

A large part of alcoholism and drug treatment consists of group meetings where alcoholics or addicts confront one another
and their problems. Newcomers who dont report the correct symptoms are treated with knowing condescension or are
actively hazed - sometimes quite abusively - until they get and repeat the party line.

When Dwight Gooden entered the alcoholism-andcocaine program at the Smithers Alcoholism Center, he described being
assailed by his fellow residents there during the constant group-therapy sessions. My stories werent as good as theirs. . . .
They said, Cmon, man, youre lying. They didnt believe me. . . . I cried a lot before I went to bed at night.

After he left the Betty Ford Center, Chevy Chase reported that he had often been angry at the counselors, who heckled the
residents mercilessly, constantly denigrating them and claiming they had been living worthless lives.
Related: Addictive behavior related to low levels of oxytocin

Does all this sound like good therapy technique? It is simple common sense that belief in your personal value and your own
strength is superior to having these things denigrated for getting your life under control.

It stigmatizes people for life. The disease model puts a label on you that you can never outgrow. Once diseased, always
diseased. The effects of this defeatist view are especially tragic - and unjust - in the case of people to whom the disease
label is most inappropriately applied in the first place: teenage binge drinkers, most drunk drivers, adult children of
alcoholics, recreational drug users discovered through drug tests, and - in areas not involving drugs or alcohol - overweight
adolescents or hyperactive or learning-disabled children.

It brutalizes and brainwashes the young. The largest single age group of people undergoing hospital treatment today for
chemical dependency, eating disorders, depression, and so forth is adolescents. A.A. members are also much younger
today, on average, than when the fellowship was founded by a group of men with serious, lifelong drinking problems.

Nonetheless, virtually none of these young people meet clinical standards of alcoholism or drug addiction.
Indeed, numerous cases have been identified in which young people have been hospitalized for smoking marijuana or even
for being suspected of using drugs.

When one such case was revealed on national television, an unusually forthright consultant for the National Association for
Alcoholism Treatment Programs confessed, Im afraid this happens far more than people in the field want to admit; its
something of a scandal.

Meanwhile, A.A. and Alateen (for teenage children of alcoholics) groups now pervade high-school and college campuses.
What is the impact of treatment that forces teenagers to take on the identity of addicts or alcoholics or children of alcoholics?

Young people are warned that their substance abuse is a permanent trait, even though we have seen that a large majority
will outgrow substance-abuse problems as they mature.
Presenting this message to the young can only prolong or exacerbate their substance abuse, since it denies their own
capacity for change and forces them to believe that any substance use for the rest of their lives will lead them back to
excess, addiction, and drunkenness.

Young treatment grads who constantly relapse and return to treatment are the norm, as in the cases of Carrie Hamilton,
Erinn Cosby, Drew Barrymore, and other young patients whose stories are less well publicized. Of course, the relapses
are then attributed to their disease and to their failure to heed the treatments warning to abstain forever.

These programs fairly frequently involve emotional abuse. Such treatments for children include refusing to allow them to
wear street clothes, keeping them in isolation for prolonged periods, or forcing them to wear self-derogatory signs, engage in
other humiliation rituals . . . , or submit to intense and prolonged group confrontation all of which, psychologists
believe, may destroy the youngsters already fragile self-esteem.

When we describe these experiences, treatment specialists often argue in response, Well, what if the kids would end up
dead if we didnt do this to them? In other words, to object to these programs is likened to promoting intoxication leading to
death.
Certainly, it is crucial to prevent children from harming themselves, and it can be worthwhile to remove children from a
problem home, whether through a residential program or a visit to a sympathetic relative.

But brainwashing, emotional blackmail, denigration, and psychological torture never work, except to make people so unsure
of who they are or what they value that they will temporarily consent to the demands of those in charge.

Worst of all, therapies that were devised for the most incorrigible children - though they dont benefit even these unfortunate
kids have been spreading down the ladder to more and more children whose behavior represents typical adolescent
exploration and insubordination.

Parents are then confronted over whether they want to save their kids or allow them to die, as though the latter were the
normal outcome of adolescence. The threat of their childrens dying is then used as emotional blackmail to make parents
accept the sacrifices necessary to place their children in expensive residential treatment programs.

It presents the alcoholic or addict as someone to emulate. Prominent graduates of treatment programs, like Drew
Barrymore, Betty Ford, Kitty Dukakis, and a host of athletes now lecture to others about chemical dependency. If alcoholics
and drug abusers suffer from a disease and are now recovering, then they can educate others about the disease and even
about how young people should live and behave.
If, on the other hand, we think of them as people who are tremendously poor at self-management, then it is indeed stupid for
the rest of us, who have not been seriously addicted, to ask them for advice and information. Someone like former football
star Bob Hayes explains that he took and sold drugs as a result of an inherited disease.

One reviewers reaction to Hayess book, Run, Bullet, Run, could stand for any and all of these confessional tracts: Aside
from a brief closing statement on personal responsibility, he self-servingly portrays himself as a victim throughout the book.

Alcoholics and addicts like Hayes regularly come into schools to relay their tortured drinking experiences and to reiterate
that alcohol is a dangerous drug. But nearly every child in these schools will drink.

It is as though the schools wished to undermine childrens sense of self-control and to attack their chances of
becoming normal drinkers, which in most cases their nonexpert parents are.

In treatment itself, recovering addicts and alcoholics counsel the drug or alcohol abuser - who usually has not drunk as
destructively and hurt himself or herself as much as the counselors! In all types of twelve-step groups, the most severely
debilitated person tends to become the leader and model for others, so that the most out-of-control shopping addict tells
others about the nature of their problems.
Who should be counseling whom? In the case of drug abuse, a number of reviews have found that informational and scare
lectures by recovering addicts produce the worst results of all prevention programs. These programs have never yet been
found to reduce drug use; on the contrary, several studies have found increased drug use in their aftermath.

It ignores the rest of the persons problems in favor of blaming them all on the addiction. When someone like Carrie
Hamilton lectures about her youthful drug abuse and delinquency (often alongside her mother, Carol Burnett), she makes
drug abuse and family failures sound like mysterious, unavoidable illnesses that some people and their parents have.
Of course, this excuses her and her mother from dealing with painful problems they would prefer to avoid. But by adopting
the disease identity as her protection through the rest of her life, the youthful convert guarantees that she cannot grow
beyond the limitations of her adolescent family life. Can people hope for more than this?

When treatment views alcoholics as being victims of a different body chemistry that forces them to become alcoholics, the
treatment process ignores the persons life problems and the functions drinking serves for the alcoholic.

Related: Feds try to suppress herbal molecule that makes your liver nearly 'bulletproof' against alcohol damage

For example, in family therapy where the alcoholics drinking is addressed as simply the result of a disease, the therapist
and the family are not able to understand that some people use alcohol to air feelings they cannot express when sober.

Ignoring dynamics like these leaves the drinker unable to cope with the things that led him or her to need to drink - such as
doubts about self-worth, a difficult relationship with a spouse, roles (such as homosexuality) that create conflict for the
person, and so on.

If the labeling of alcoholism as a disease provides welcome relief from the shame of overdrinking. it also prevents people
from confronting the emotional tasks they need to accomplish to attain personal wholeness.

It traps people in a world inhabited by fellow disease-sufferers. Many recovering people report that they feel
comfortable only with others in exactly the same plight. They find they cant create intimacy outside of treatment and that
they are driven constantly to talk about their alcoholism or addiction.
This is a frequent hang-up for recovering alcoholics who attend A.A. meetings so religiously that they cant maintain a life
outside of the group. The phenomenon of compulsive therapy attendance has made many people ask us, Is there such a
thing as addiction to treatment?

Indeed there is, when people rely on a twelve step group or therapy to the point where it disables them from
conducting outside relationships and activities.

One of us has treated a number of A.A. members or treatment graduates who now fear they cant deal with normal society.
One man, who was regularly asked to head his local A.A. group, had dated a series of women he met at A.A. Unfortunately,
all of these relationships had ended in bitterness and mutual recriminations.

But when he tried to date outside the group, he discovered that nonalcoholic women found him overbearing and compulsive.

I dont want to be limited for the rest of my life to dealing with alkies - Id like to think I can advance beyond that;
he plaintively told us.

This man felt that dealing exclusively with alcoholics was debilitating him, and yet he couldnt escape A.A.

It excludes other approaches, many of which are more successful. Even if one accepts that many A.A. members are
happy and successful, it is simply absurd to discourage people from trying to recover without A.A. The National Council on
Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (NCADD) frequently announces statistics about the continually rising costs of alcoholism
and the increasing number of alcoholics in our society.

But, then, the NCADD is capable only of calling for more of the standard approach to treating alcoholism that has
accompanied these increases, while discouraging all alternative approaches.

Why should things improve all of a sudden if we simply do more of the same? The A.A. approach to peoples drinking
problems has shown conclusively that it cannot make a decisive difference for most active problem drinkers, since there are
very few alcoholics who arent already aware of - or who havent already attended - A.A.
Meanwhile, greater numbers of people are being forced to enter private treatment centers and A.A. as a result of court
orders, Employee Assistance Programs, or school counseling programs.

Despite the almost universal belief that compelling people to attend standard treatment programs is helpful, these programs
regularly demonstrate they are no more effective than self-initiated programs for curing addictions.

Psychologists William Miller and Reid Hester, reviewing all the comparative studies on treatment for alcoholism, made a
surprising finding:

Virtually all of them [the standard treatments] lacked adequate scientific evidence of effectiveness.

At the same time, they discovered, the treatment approaches most clearly supported as effective... were very
rarely used in American treatment programs.

What dont really work in the long run are the conversion-experience type treatments; what do work are therapies
that teach people skills at self-management and coping.

Nonetheless, most American treatment personnel seem hell-bent on eliminating any other treatment for alcoholism besides
twelve-step programs. In the United States, discredited disease-treatment programs - ones that NIAAA Director Enoch
Gordis believes may be frequently useless and wasteful and sometimes dangerous - proliferate and spread into whole new
areas of behavior.

This issue is important because the United States spends more money on health care than any other country - and the
percentage of our gross national product that we spend on health care is growing faster than that in any other country.

The fastest-growing component of the health-care system is substance abuse and related mental-health treatments.
According to a hospital trade publication;
 Psychiatric, chemical dependency and rehabilitative hospital care - all largely unregulated by government
payment mechanisms - are booming.

This is one reason so many companies are being forced to cut insurance benefits or are asking employees to pay a greater
share. What if your insurance rates were raised to pay for a fellow employee who was undergoing a repeat treatment for
cocaine addiction, since he had relapsed one or more times?

How would you feel about sharing the bill for a colleague who entered an expensive hospital eating-disorders clinic?

Do you think that smokers who want to quit should enter treatment programs and be excused from work, with pay, while
they concentrate on quitting? And, especially, how would you react if you had quit smoking on your own?

It is morally and economically necessary for us to evaluate the effectiveness of alcoholism and other addiction treatments.
For we are wasting limited health-care resources to place people in expensive treatments - treatments that have not shown
they do more than inexpensive, straightforward skills counseling or than people accomplish on their ownoften more
reliably!

Kitty Dukakis: Chemical Dependency Reduced to Absurdity

Kitty Dukakis became the paradigm of the addicted person of the 1990s. Kitty Dukakis has been eager all along to accept
the disease and chemically dependent labels. Advertisements for her autobiography, Now You Know, trumpet the
opening line of the book, Im Kitty Dukakis and Im a drug addict and an alcoholic.

Mrs. Dukakis seemingly has been either addicted or in treatment throughout her adult life. Shortly before she joined her
husband in his 1988 presidential campaign, she revealed that she had been treated for a twenty-six-year reliance on diet
pills, which she began before she married Michael Dukakis.

Soon after her husbands defeat in the election, she began to drink herself unconscious and underwent a series of
treatments for her alcoholism and for a variety of emotional problems.
That treatment did not succeed. Mrs. Dukakis only began getting drunk after the election, for which she first entered the
Edgehill Newport hospital.

But soon after this treatment experience, she began having explosive relapses in which she drank rubbing alcohol, nail
polish remover, hair spray, and other commercial products containing alcohol.

Moreover, she discovered during the course of writing her book that she suffers from another disease - manic-depressive
disorder - and as a result she ends the book with the revelation that she is receiving lithium treatment.

Previously, Mrs. Dukakis had been prescribed Prozac, a drug featured on the cover of Newsweek in 1990 as a new miracle
in the treatment of depression, to no avail.

Mrs. Dukakis appears, in the book and on television, a forlorn being. Indeed, syndicated columnist Ellen Goodman, who had
known Mrs. Dukakis, wrote a column entitled Do Our Drug Treatment Programs Label Patients as Losers? Ms. Goodman
wondered aloud how labeling oneself as sick and without hope is helpful.

What happens when those who wrestle with problems of self-esteem are required to wear such a label? . . .
Today, Kitty Dukakis describes herself by diagnosis. Drug addict. Alcoholic. Manic-depressive.

Ms. Goodman ended her column by wishing that Kitty Dukakis might see the brighter qualities that others have seen in her,
and which seem entirely to have disappeared thanks to her various diagnoses and cures.

It seems clear that excessive drinking is only the tip of Mrs. Dukakiss problems, and that medical treatment will never get to
the bottom of them. Labeling Kitty Dukakis as a sick person who needs medical treatment is a palliative for her
uncomfortable marital and personal problems.

Reviewers have commented about how insensitive and unaware of her problems Michael Dukakis appeared to be, yet Kitty
never reflects on the limitations of her spouse or their relationship.

Somehow, her never-ending disease-oriented treatment fails to raise crucial issues for Mrs. Dukakis about a life and
marriage she seems to have found intolerable.

Will Kitty Dukakis be writing another book in which she reveals she has discovered she is suffering from one more dis-ease
that of codependence?
With Kitty Dukakis as a prominent model of the addict/alcoholic, those who look to her life for answers are being fed yet
another self-defeating solution. To call Kitty Dukakiss and her audiences problems diseases is to evade reality, much as
Mrs. Dukakis used diet pills and alcohol to do.

Whether the pain Mrs. Dukakis and others feel is temporary or persistent, relatively mild or relatively severe, it does not
need to rule the rest of their lives. Kitty Dukakis and the rest of us are more than our misery and problems.

Moreover, what troubles her and those like her are life problems, not diseases. And when we have reduced them to life size,
we can begin to deal with them reasonably and hopefully.

The Experience of Addiction

The question is: If addiction isnt a disease, then what is it? An addiction is a habitual response and a source of
gratification or security.

It is a way of coping with internal feelings and external pressures that provides the addict with predictable
gratifications, but that has concomitant costs.

Eventually these costs may outweigh the subjective benefits the addiction offers the individual. Nonetheless, people
continue their addictions as long as they believe the addictions continue to do something for them.

It is important to place addictive habits in their proper context, as part of peoples lives, their personalities, their relationships,
their environments, their perspectives. The effort to change an addiction will generally affect all these other facets of a
persons life as well.
An addiction may involve any attachment or sensation that grows to such proportions that it damages a persons life.

Addictions, no matter to what, follow certain common patterns. We first made clear in Love and Addiction that addiction - the
single-minded grasping of a magic-seeming object or involvement; the loss of control, perspective, and priorities - is not
limited to drug and alcohol addictions.

When a person becomes addicted, it is not to a chemical but to an experience. Anything that a person finds sufficiently
consuming and that seems to remedy deficiencies in the persons life can serve as an addiction.

The addictive potential of a substance or other involvement lies primarily in the meaning it has for a person.

A person is vulnerable to addiction when that person feels a lack of satisfaction in life, an absence of intimacy or strong
connections to other people, a lack of self-confidence or compelling interests, or a loss of hope.

Periods such as adolescence, military service, and times of isolation or grief may for a time make people especially
susceptible to an addiction.
Related: Sadness: The Problem and The Solution

Under some circumstances, a harmful involvement can become so important to a person that addiction is very likely, as
heroin addiction was for many in Vietnam.

Situations in which people are deprived of family and the usual community supports; where they are denied rewarding or
constructive activities; where they are afraid, uncomfortable, and under stress; and where they are out of control of their
lives - these are situations especially likely to create addiction.

The relationship between hopelessness, lack of opportunity, and persistent addiction is, of course, a template for lives in
ghettos. Recognizing the connection between these situational factors and addiction will explain why our wars on drugs,
including the latest, never succeed.

The hook of the addiction - the thing that keeps people coming back to it - is that it gives people feelings and gratifying
sensations that they are not able to get in other ways. It may block out sensations of pain, uncertainty, or discomfort. It may
create powerfully distracting sensations that focus and absorb attention. It may enable a person to forget, or feel okay
about, insurmountable problems.
Related: American Drug Trafficking Pilot Tells All From Prison

It may provide artificial, temporary feelings of security or calm, of self-worth or accomplishment, of power or control, of
intimacy or belonging.

These benefits explain why a person keeps coming back to the addictive experience - an addiction accomplishes something
for that person, or the person anticipates that it will do so, however illusory these benefits may actually be.

Addiction, drug abuse, alcoholism, obesity, and smoking all involve and are fueled by value choices. Think of people whose
lives are together - who enjoy strong emotional bonds with others, productive work, satisfying feelings of competence and
of fun, and a sense of responsibility toward others.

Will they become addicted to drugs or alcohol because of some physiological susceptibility and allow the addiction to undo
the fabric of their lives? For you personally, can you imagine getting so drunk that you would abuse your infant child? It just
doesnt happen that way.

If you have better things to do and value other things more than escape into intoxication, then you wont make intoxication
the center of your life. And if you are addicted, you can best overcome it by creating or re-creating those personal strengths
and values.
Related: Guide for Addicted Veterans and their Families

Whatever the subjective benefits of an addiction or the values that drive an addiction, the person pays a price for an
addictive involvement. Addictions make people less aware of and less able to respond to other people, events, and
activities. Thus, the addictive experience reinforces and exacerbates the problems the person wanted so badly to get away
from in the first place.

In the persons inner, subjective experience, the addiction may make things seem better. But in the real world, it only makes
things worse. With the worst addictions, jobs and relationships fall away; health deteriorates; debts increase; opportunities
disappear; the business of life is neglected.

The person is increasingly out of touch with nourishing contacts and essential responsibilities. This growing
disengagement from the realities of life sets the person up for the trauma of withdrawal. When the addictive experience is
removed, the person is deprived of what has become his or her primary source of comfort and reassurance.

Simultaneously, the person crash-lands back onto an inhospitable world, a world from which the person has been using
the addiction to escape. Compared with these existential torments, the purely physical dislocations of withdrawal are, even
for most heroin addicts, not particularly debilitating.
After all, nearly everyone who receives powerful narcotics in the hospital gives them up after returning home or when the
illness is over. Consider also that drug addicts and alcoholics indicate that the most unbearable drug withdrawal is from
cigarettes.

And if one puts all withdrawal on a scale, probably the worst of all occurs in the case of failed love relationships.

The experience of withdrawal, like that of addiction, is shaped by the way a person interprets it. In therapeutic communities
like Daytop Village in New York, addicts are not excused from their normal duties when they undergo withdrawal; as a
result, withdrawing addicts - even those who have had several withdrawal episodes previously - continue mopping floors
and carrying out other duties.

Cultural beliefs also play a crucial role in addiction - for example, beliefs that are widely propagated about the power of a
drug to enslave a person and the difficulty of escaping it actually contribute to the difficulties of withdrawal. Equally important
are the persons readiness to confront withdrawal and belief that he or she can manage it.

If you are convinced that withdrawal will be intolerably painful and that you cannot withstand it, or if you dont have
sufficiently powerful reasons to confront withdrawal experiences, you wont be prepared to withdraw from your addiction.The
addict who feels incapable of existing without a drug can never successfully withdraw, and doesnt want to try.
Ironically, one of the beliefs that most contribute to the susceptibility to addiction is the belief in the power of addiction
itself. Believing that drugs are stronger than you are means you will become addicted more easily and stay addicted longer.

But if you recognize that drugs and alcohol never take away your own responsibilities and capacity to control your destiny -
even if you have alcoholic relatives or have had addictive problems in the past - you always stand a better chance of
avoiding addiction or dealing with it successfully.

A Commonsense Way of Thinking About Overcoming an Addiction

Although the schematic description above is useful for understanding what addiction is and how it comes about, we need
not think of all our troublesome habits or fixations in such dire terms.

In fact, when we overdramatize our addictions, we may do ourselves an injustice and make change more difficult. An
addiction may be more or less severe - and a person may be more or less able to give it up - depending on the
circumstances of the persons life.

Addiction is more likely in stressful times, times when gratifications are slim, times when a person is less together
or secure.

Likewise, one type of excess may be more stubbornly entrenched in a persons routine, or more closely linked to a persons
self-doubt and insecurity, than another.

Addiction occurs along a continuum - there is no easy test to tell you whether you have an addiction or just a bad habit. For
example, by some estimates, half of all Americans are overweight. Are they all addicted overeaters?

Many people encounter significant health risks because of the way they eat (recall that heart disease is Americas major
killer). Are these the addicts? Some people are preoccupied day and night with their eating; they are suffused with guilt over
eating too much, yet they are unable to change their eating habits.
Surely, these are the addicts, we think. A still more limited group of people encounter major health problems through their
overweight, severely restricting their lives, but are unable to modify their eating habits.

At the furthest extreme of addiction are the minuscule number of people who become so fat they are completely immobile -
people we sometimes see on television who may not even be able to fit through their doorways.

If we call only these people - people who have given up all effort to control their eating - true addicts, we end up with a
fraction of a percentage of addicted overeaters, and books wouldnt need to be written for millions of people who fear they
have food addictions.

Moreover, for this minuscule group, concepts such as denial hardly seem to have meaning - does the twelve-hundred-
pound man who hasnt left his house in years really need to be told that he has an addictive eating problem?

For most people, the exercise of drawing the line that divides addicted from normal is not very helpful. We need to
remember that nearly all people cut back and forth across these categories at different points in their lives and in different
situations.
Although letting your urges overcome you to gain total control of your life is a relatively rare phenomenon, everyone has
addictive urges and sometimes gives in to them. Addiction characterizes some aspect of everyones life - this is one reason
why it is so ridiculous to think of it as a disease.

Thin people whom we envy for their self-control will tell us there are some treats they cant keep in the house because
otherwise they would eat them all at once. Remember that people whom we admire for having had the strength to quit
smoking used to search ashtrays desperately looking for a butt when they ran out of cigarettes!

What we most need to know is not how bad off or how genuinely addicted we are but, rather, how people learn to resist
successfully the addictive or unhealthy urges that come with being human.

How do they construct full lives, develop alternatives to addiction, learn the strength to stop after having started or, when
necessary, not to start at all?

Let us start, then, with alcoholism, the addiction most commonly referred to as a disease. There must be - there is - a better
way to understand and redirect the paths people take into and out of problem drinking.

Heres How Industry-Funded Research Is Making Us Sick And Fat + Like Tobacco
And Big Pharma, The Sugar Industry Has Manipulated Research For 50 Years
October 26 2016 | From: DaisyLuther / NaturalBlaze

A scathing new study has put artificial sweeteners under the spotlight and is supporting what
health writers have been saying for years.
The researchers have found that most of the previous studies into the sweeteners touting their alleged health
advantages over using sugar as a sweetener, were written or sponsored by the companies that produce the
products.

Related: The Top 10 Tricks Used By Corporate Junk Science

"A trio of researchers from John Hopkins University in Maryland, the University of California San Francisco, and
Australias University of Sydney took an extensive look at 31 past reviews on the potential weight loss effects of
artificial sweeteners.

They found that studies directly funded by sweetener companies or published in industry-funded journals were
more likely to find positive health benefits compared to reviews funded independently or by the competing sugar
industry.

Similarly, reviews authored by scientists who had a relevant financial conflict of interest were also less likely to
shine a harsh light on sweeteners, either directly via positive results or by putting a positive spin on negative
results when discussing their conclusions."

- Source

Note that even the healthy sweetener that is supposedly made from stevia hardly contains any stevia at all - Truvia is still
made up of terrible chemical ingredients that are hazardous to your health.
Earlier this month it was discovered that the sugar industry paid the equivalent of nearly $50,000 in todays dollars to fund a
review back in 1967 that concluded fats were the leading cause of heart disease and sugar had little nothing to do with
heart disease risk.

"In the 1950s, studies showing a link between coronary heart disease (CHD) and sugar intake started to emerge.

When the sugar industry (which many not-so-affectionately call Big Sugar) got wind of this not-so-sweet news,
they paid scientists to downplay the link and promote saturated fat as the culprit instead, a new study has
revealed.

The research, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, was based on thousands of pages of Sugar Research
Foundation (SRF) documents, reports, and statements that Cristin E. Kearns, a postdoctoral fellow at UCSF,
discovered in the basement at Harvard University.

The SRF (known today as The Sugar Association) sponsored its first CHD research project in 1965 a literature
review published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The reviews objective was established by SRF, and the
group contributed articles for inclusion and received drafts. The SRFs funding and role was not disclosed.

Why is this a big deal?

Big Sugar paid Harvard scientists the equivalent of about $50,000 in todays dollars to influence the review, and
subsequently spent $600,000 ($5.3 million in 2016 dollars) to teach people who had never had a course in
biochemistry that sugar is what keeps every human being alive and with energy to face our daily problems.

- Read the rest of this article here

For years many industries have delayed the publication of research that may put their products in a bad light, others have
simply paid off researchers to point the finger of blame at other products, as did the Sugar Association in 1967.

The revelations over sweeteners come as no surprise, but they should remind us that we need to do our own research
rather than taking something at face value just because there was a study.
Drugs companies, the oil industry, and tobacco companies have all used such tactics in the past.

This isnt new. The FDA upholds these studies all the time, and products that could literally kill us end up on the store
shelves marked as safe, false nutritional information that supports the sugar lobby and the grain lobby is touted as the truth,
and Americans get sicker and fatter as a result.

Industries and individual companies have paid researchers to lie or distort the truth on their behalf in order to sell more of
their products. Not only is this shameful behavior from the companies, but also from the researchers that compromised their
science to accommodate them.

The results of such spurious research have an even further effect. Fewer people start to trust medical and scientific
research - including well-executed and honest research.
The answer as always it to look behind the headlines, find the counter arguments, track down the source of the funding, and
make your decisions accordingly.

PS: The best quality low-carb sweetener weve gotten our hands on is Agave 5 you can find it here.

Related: The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal + What Is Aspartame? Five Surprising Facts You
Never Know About This Chemical Sweetener

Like Tobacco And Big Pharma, The Sugar Industry Has Manipulated Research For 50
Years
Dont you love people who cling to scientific research without ever questioning who sponsored
that research? Using archival documents, a new report published by JAMA Internal
Medicine examines the sugar industrys role in heart disease research.
The study suggests that the sugar industry sponsored research to influence the scientific debate to cast doubt on
the hazards of sugar and to promote dietary fat as the culprit in heart disease. Governments worldwide agreed just
like they did with the tobacco industry and big pharma.

Related: The Sugar Conspiracy - Professor John Yudkin: The Man Who Tried To Warn Us About Sugar

The sugar industry was instrumental in influencing the prevailing thinking about fat, obesity and related diseases holding that
quantifying calories should be a principal concern and target for intervention.

Part of this thinking is that consumed calories - regardless of their sources - are equivalent; i.e. a calorie is a calorie. There
needs to be a greater qualitative focus on the sources of calories consumed (i.e. a greater focus on types of foods) and on
the metabolic changes that result from consuming foods of different types.

Calorie-focused thinking is inherently biased against high-fat foods, many of which may be protective against obesity and
related diseases, and supportive of starchy and sugary replacements, which are likely detrimental.

The intake of dietary fructose increased significantly from 1970 to 2000. There has been a 25% increase in available added
sugars during this period. The average person has a daily added sugar intake of 79 g (equivalent to 15% of energy intake),
approximately half of which was fructose.
Related: New Zealand Considers Taxing Sugar While New Zealand Government Invests $240m In Coca Cola And
Fast Food Chains

A report - authored by Cristin E. Kearns, Laura A. Schmidt, and Stanton A. Glantz of the University of California, San
Francisco - examined internal documents from the Sugar Research Foundation (which later evolved into the Sugar
Association).

The Sugar Research Foundation started doing research on coronary heart disease research in 1965; its first project was a
literature review published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1967.

The review focused on fat and cholesterol as the dietary causes of coronary heart disease, downplaying sugar consumption
as a risk factor.

UCSF researchers have recently claimed sugar should be controlled like alcohol and tobacco to protect public health since it
is fueling a global obesity pandemic, contributing to 35 million deaths annually worldwide from non-communicable diseases
like diabetes, heart disease and cancer.

Like manufacturers from both Big Tobacco and Big Pharma who denied the presence of any danger in their products and
even spent millions of dollars trying to discredit the research that points to problems, the Sugar Industry followed suit.
Related: Rumsfeld & Monsanto Team Up To Bring You Neuro-Toxic Aspartame & Splenda

While the Sugar Research Foundations funding and role were not disclosed, internal documents reveal that the
organization set the reviews objective, contributed articles to be included, and received drafts - a smoking gun linking the
industrys influence over the research it paid for, writes Marion Nestle in a related commentary, also published in JAMA
Internal Medicine.

This 50-year-old incident may seem like ancient history, but it is quite relevant, not least because it answers some
questions germane to our current era. Is it really true that food companies deliberately set out to manipulate
research in their favor?

Yes, it is, and the practice continues, writes Nestle, the Paulette Goddard Professor of Nutrition and Food Studies
at NYU Steinhardt."

Industry-sponsored nutrition research, like that of research sponsored by the tobacco, chemical, and
pharmaceutical industries, almost invariably produces results that confirm the benefits or lack of harm of the
sponsors products, even when independently sponsored research comes to opposite conclusions, Nestle adds.

Nestle says the report should serve as a warning to policymakers, researchers, clinicians, and journalists in carefully
interpreting studies funded by food companies with vested interests in the results, and highlights the need to find better
ways to fund studies and to prevent and disclose conflicts of interest.

Related: Big Tobacco Misrepresented Dangers From Cigarettes, Same For Big Pharma With Vaccines

This Is How Your Aura Affects Your Health & Those Around You + Magnetic Fields Of
The Human Body And Their Functions & 13 Signs You Are Experiencing A Spiritual
Awakening
October 24 2016 | From: CollectiveEvolution / SitsShow / TheUnboundedSpirit

An aura field can be defined as a luminous glow or radiation that surrounds a persons body,
almost like a halo. Ancient depictions of religious and spiritual figures often feature this aura, but
today, modern science is discovering that we are all, in fact, surrounded by this type of field, and it
can actually affect the way we feel.

We know that energy cannot be seen with the naked human eye, which is why attempts to measure invisible
phenomena scientifically are often greeted with harsh criticism, but thanks to the groundbreaking work of
dedicated scientists from all over the world, the concept of non-material science is starting to become accepted in
the mainstream.

This refers to the idea that the physical material reality we perceive with our senses isnt the only reality thats available for
us to study in a modern day scientific manner.

The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than
in all the previous centuries of its existence.

Nikola Tesla

Before getting into how our aura can affect us and those around us, Id like to mention that human thoughts, intentions,
feelings and emotions - factors associated with consciousness - have been shown to have a direct effect on and correlation
to our physical material world.

"The stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a
great thought than like a great machine.

Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator
 and governor of the realm of matter. Get over it, and accept the inarguable conclusion. The universe is immaterial-
mental and spiritual."

- Sir James Jeans (The Mental Universe ; Nature 436:29,2005)

To see a more in-depth explanation of how factors associated with consciousness are intertwined with our physical material
reality you can read this article:

Physicists Examine Consciousness & Conclude The Universe Is Spiritual, Immaterial & Mental

The Human Aura

Work by the brilliant scientists over at the Institute of HeartMath can perhaps best shed light on one aspect of human aura.
A large portion of their research has investigated heart and brain interaction.

Researchers have examined how the heart and brain communicate with each other and how that affects our consciousness
and the way in which we perceive our world. For example, when a person is feeling really positive emotions like gratitude,
love, or appreciation, the heart beats out a certain message.

Because the heart beats out the largest electromagnetic field produced in the body, researchers are able to gather
significant data from it. According to Rolin McCratey, Ph.D, and Director of Research at the Institute:

"Emotional information is actually included and modulated into these fields. By learning to shift our emotions, we
are changing the information coded into the magnetic fields that are radiated by the heart, and that can impact
those around us.

We are fundamentally and deeply connected with each other and the planet itself, and what we do individually
really does count and matters."

- Source
 Did you know that your heart emits electromagnetic fields which change according to your emotions, or that the
human heart has a magnetic field that can be measured up to several feet away from the human body?

Did you know that positive emotions create physiological benefits in your body, or that you can boost your
immune system by conjuring up positive emotions?

Did you know that negative emotions can create nervous system chaos, and that positive emotions do the
complete opposite?

The bottom line is, feelings of love, gratitude, and compassion any positive feelings whatsoever have a larger impact
than we could have ever imagined.

The Spiritual Heart - is in a way a little like a smart phone, invisibly connecting us to a large network of information. It is through an unseen energy
that the heart emits that humans are profoundly connected to all living things. The energy of the heart literally links us to each other. Every person's
heart contributes to a 'collective field environment.' This short video explains the importance of this connection and how we each add to this collective
energy field. The energetic field of the heart even connects us with the earth itself .

Its fascinating to consider how the hearts magnetic field might be interacting with and affecting other people, and it leads
me to wonder if perhaps the electromagnetic fields around our bodies are somehow connected to that of the Earth.

What type of effect, if any, might the information coded into our electromagnetic fields have on the information coded
into the Earths field? Its all very exciting, and there are so many questions still left to answer.

Below is a video of Dr. Konstantin Korotkov, a professor of physics at St. Petersburg State Technical University, who
believes that our positive and negative thoughts each have a different impact on our surrounding environment.
A Russian scientist is trying to convince people they can change the world simply by using their own energy. He claims that thinking in a certain way
can have a positive or negative effect on the surrounding environment. "We are developing the idea that our consciousness is part of the material
world and that with our consciousness we can directly influence our world," said Dr. Konstantin Korotkov, a professor of physics at St. Petersburg
State Technical University. To bridge our understanding of the unseen world of energy, scientific experiments are being carried out using a technique
called bioelectrophotography. The assumption is that we are constantly emitting energy. Bioelectrophotography aims to capture these energy fields
seen as a light around the body -- or what some people would call your aura.

He has developed a scientific device based on the ancient Chinese system of energy meridians which measures the bio-
energy of living organisms, as well as the environment.

The device, called the GDV, uses a completely painless electrical current applied to the fingertips - taking less than one
millisecond to work - to highlight potential health (physiological and psycho-emotional) abnormalities.

The bodys response is measured in the form of an electron cloud which is composed of light energy photons. The glow of
this discharge is invisible to the human eye (humans can only see one percent of the entire electromagnetic spectrum) and
is captured by an optical CCD camera system and then translated into a digital computer.
In the GDV software programs, the glow from the different sectors of the finger images is projected onto the shape of a
human body in correspondence with the location of the different organs and systems. As a result, it produces energy field
images that allow for intuitive analysis of the physiological level of human body functioning.

It has been approved and received registration as a routine medical diagnostic device by the Russian Ministry of Health
upon recommendation of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

According to Eastern metaphysical theories of Ayurvedic Indian medicine, there are seven Chakras, or integrated energy
centers, correlated with physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual well-being.

These energy Chakras are positioned or embedded into the spinal column at various locations beginning with the coccyx,
rising all the way to the crown of the head.
Dr. Pradeep B. Deshpande, a Professor Emeritus at the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Louisville,
explains:

"Each Chakra is considered to resonate at a different frequency level. With new BioWell software, it is now
possible to quantitatively estimate the energy of Chakras and graphically display their level of activation, and
indicate whether this level of activation is above or below the level found from large numbers of subjects.

- Source

The results from a case study he conducted involving over 100 participants in attendance indicate that imbalanced Chakras
are easily detectable:

"Each individual sector or portion of the fingertip is connected energetically with specific organs and organ systems
such as the respiratory system. When the data of the 10 individual BIO-grams are collated and interpolated, an
image of the entire full body energy field is created.

An example of the full body energy field from a healthy and unhealthy/emotionally unbalanced individual are shown
above. The gaps and the reduced emissions and out-of-balance Chakras for the unhealthy individual are quite
obvious."

- Source

Please keep in mind that clinical studies of more than 10,000 patient cases with various health challenges have also been
well documented in Russia.

How to See a Human Aura in 5 Minutes

Magnetic Fields Of The Human Body And Their Functions
Manly P. Hall is a philosopher and mystic from the early 20th century. Some view him as a pillar of
esoteric knowledge, while others think he was part of a dark cabal that has infiltrated Masonic
lodges throughout the globe.

Hall did not work his way up the degrees as most Masons do. Instead, he was given an honorary 33rd degree after
establishing himself as a learned scholar in many fields.

While it is all too easy to label someone "evil" purely for an association to a group that has overall been corrupted to a large
extent, those who truly seek knowledge and wisdom beyond armchair judgments can see past a book's cover, for the
wisdom within its pages.

Those who dismiss what Hall had to say are the ones who miss out on the knowledge he has to offer but if one can look
past appearances, then a wealth of information can be claimed.

I think that knowledge is everywhere, even held within the hands of some of the most diabolical people on the planet. But in
receiving these gems of wisdom, we need not consider ourselves evil or supporting those who act insidiously.

Knowledge is amoral. When used in the right hands it can be a powerful tool. but in the wrong hands (usually the ignorant),
it can be a destructive weapon. But for the one who foolishly dismisses wisdom because of an appearance alone, they will
suffer the pitfalls of their own prejudice.
But for the truly discerning, the ability to absorb data from any source is the key to personal growth and evolution. To the
discerning mind, wisdom can be found everywhere, but it will remain hidden behind a veil if we never explore it.

As such, if you have prejudices about Manly P. Hall because of his association with Freemasonry, I ask you to set them
aside and open your heart and mind to hear what he has to say.

And I will share that the concept of magnetic fields affecting the body is hardly new and has been well established for years.
Our energetic body connects directly to the Earth-mother in many ways, earthing and geomagnetic fields are some of them.
Both of these play an important role in restoring the health of mind, body, and soul.

Related: Telepathy will be Enabled by the Earth's Magnetic Field on a Global Scale
Related: NASA Confirms: People Are Capable Of Super Human Abilities Using These Ancient Techniques!

Magnetic Fields of the Human Body and Their Functions is the title of an interview with Manly P. Hall, a Freemason who
was very knowledgeable in esoteric teachings.

I do not agree with everything that Manly teaches; however, in the interview, he shared a lot of very important information
about energy fields and the human body, so if you want to learn some empowering information about energy fields and the
human body, I highly encourage you to watch and listen to the interview.

Manly Palmer Hall (March 18, 1901 August 29, 1990) was a Canadian-born author and mystic. He is perhaps
most famous for his work The Secret Teachings of All Ages: An Encyclopedic Outline of Masonic, Hermetic,
Qabbalistic and Rosicrucian Symbolical Philosophy, which is widely regarded as his magnum opus, and which
he published at the age of 25 (or 27, 1928)

He has been widely recognized as a leading scholar in the fields of religion, mythology, mysticism, and the occult.

Carl Jung, when writing Psychology and Alchemy, borrowed material from Halls private collection.
In 1934, Hall founded the Philosophical Research Society (PRS) in Los Angeles, California, dedicating it to an
idealistic approach to the solution of human problems.

The PRS claims to be non-sectarian and entirely free from educational, political, or ecclesiastical control, and the
Societys programs stress the need for the integration of philosophy, religion, and science into one system of
instruction.

The PRS Library, a public facility devoted to source materials in obscure fields, has many rare and scarce items
now impossible to obtain elsewhere.

In 1973 (47 years after writing The Secret Teachings of All Ages), Hall was recognized as a 33 Mason (the
highest honor conferred by the Supreme Council of the Scottish Rite), at a ceremony held at PRS on December
 8th, despite never being initiated into the physical craft.

In his over 70-year career, Hall delivered approximately 8,000 lectures in the United States and abroad, authored
over 150 books and essays, and wrote countless magazine articles.

Manly Hall: Magnetic Fields of the Human Body and Their Functions

13 Signs You Are Experiencing A Spiritual Awakening

Here are 13 crystal clear signs that youre experiencing a spiritual awakening:

1. You desire less stuff and more simplicity. You realize that the less you possess the more unburdened your psyche is,
and instead of wanting to acquire material wealth, you are seeking to find your inner wealth.

2. You are drawn to mind-expanding books. You dont read books anymore just in order to entertain yourself when you
feel like having nothing better to do, and choose to read those books that help you to become the greatest version of
yourself.

3. You spend more time alone in silence. You go for solitary walks in nature and meditate in silence so as to reconnect
and make peace with yourself.

4. You eat healthier and take better care of your body. You start treating your body like its sacred, listening to its
wisdom, and keeping it as healthy as you can.

5. You feel more connected to nature and all living beings. You recognize the interconnectedness and interdependence
of all beings and feel a sense of oneness with everyone and everything.

6. You feel compassion about the suffering in the world. You become aware of how much pain there is all around you
and do your best to alleviate it in any way you can.

7. You take responsibility in your hands. You realize that theres no point in having a victims mentality and blaming
others for whats going wrong in your life, and you take conscious action to shape your destiny.

8. You are mindful of your actions. Youve discovered the tremendous power of your actions and you make sure to act in
ways that dont negatively affect yourself and the world.

9. The past and the future lose control over your life. You understand that the past and future dont truly exist, and the
only moment that was, is, and will ever be is the present.
10. You have a deep yearning for meaning. You comprehend that living a normal life is empty of meaning and purpose,
and you seek to create your own path in your lifes journey.

11. You are more creative. You feel an increased desire to creatively express yourself and turn your dreams into reality.

12. You expose your true self to the world. Youve dropped your social masks of pretense and you are open
to communicate your innermost thoughts and feelings with others without feeling guilty or ashamed.

13. You have a loss of interest in competition. You realize that competition brings conflict and suffering, and that the only
way to live in harmony with others is by having a loving and compassionate attitude towards them.

US Attorney General Finally Admits Weed Isnt A Gateway Drug - Prescription Pills Are
+ Study Proves Medical Marijuana Can Replace Dangerous Pharmaceuticals
October 21 2016 | From: TheAntiMedia / NaturalNews / Various

The National Institute on Drug Abuse is a U.S. federal research institute focused on [advancing]
science on the causes and consequences of drug use and addiction to apply that knowledge to
improve individual and public health.
Though it admits the majority of people who use marijuana do not go on to use other, harder substances, it
still describes marijuana as a gateway drug.

Related: New Discovery Proves Humans Have Been Using Cannabis for at Least 2,400 Years

But U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch recently told a group of Kentucky high school students the role of marijuana in the
national drug abuse debate has been overstated.

While discussing how heroin abuse and how individuals often develop an addiction, Lynch argued:

'[I]ndividuals [start out] with a prescription drug problem, and then because they need more and more, they turn to
heroin. It isnt so much that marijuana is the step right before using prescription drugs or opioids - it is true that if
you tend to experiment with a lot of things in life, you may be inclined to experiment with drugs, as well. But its not
like were seeing that marijuana as a specific gateway.

Attorney General Lynch added that instead of trafficking rings, what introduce[s] a person to opioids [is] the
household medicine cabinet.

The event she attended was part of the Prescription Opioid Heroin Epidemic Awareness Week, a campaign designed by the
White House that includes 250 different events highlighting the importance of prevention, enforcement, and treatment.

As expected, the campaign focused on advertising the official approach to drug abuse, encouraging the public to
support the Obama administrations approach to the opioid crisis.

Measures embraced by the administration include expanding evidence-based prevention and treatment programs,
increasing access to the overdose-reversal medicine naloxone, and supporting targeted enforcement activities.

But nowhere in the official campaign page is there a list of practical solutions to the opioid crisis, an admission of guilt, or a
concession stating that, despite marijuanas official federal classification, cannabis is not seen as the root of the problem by
the very head of the United States Department of Justice.

In early August, the Obama administration said no to a bid urging the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to reconsider
how marijuana is classified under federal drug control laws. Currently, the DEA lists marijuana as a Schedule I drug, along
with heroin, the pivot drug of the opioid epidemic.
But as the Attorney Generals comments demonstrate, the federal government fails to take its own classification
methodology seriously, choosing instead to contend that prescription drug abuse is a much bigger issue.

Related: All signs point to a corporate takeover of the marijuana industry by Bayer, Monsanto

Per its federal classification, marijuana should be seen as a threat as dangerous as heroin, and yet Lynch appears to
contend the abuse of legal drugs is keeping federal agents busy - not the enforcement of her agencys own rules.

What Lynch is failing to discuss on the federal governments anti-opioid abuse campaign trail is the racist, opportunistic
roots of the failed and decades-long drug war in America.

But as American states begin to shift their approach to some of the targets of this nationwide anti-drug campaign, legalized
marijuana is able to accomplish what many drug war apologists claimed criminalization would achieve: bringing down the
drug cartels. But as the Washington Post report demonstrates, legalizing pot is not enough.

While powerful drug cartels have seen legalized marijuana taking a chunk out of their profits, the criminalization of other
drugs such as heroin continues to put addicts in harms way.

With drug cartels seeing an increase in demand due to the pressure mounting from the growth of the relationship
between the government and the pharmaceutical industry, dangerous alternatives to heroin, such as fentanyl, are sold on
the street as regular heroin.
Without legal means to produce the drugs the market demands, these cartels are not concerned with the quality of their
product nor the health of their consumer.

When looking at the destruction stemming from the illegal drug trafficking industry, we are able to trace it back to the
criminalization of drug commerce and use - and yet government officials prefer to live in the dark ages, upping their
involvement with the war on yet another drug epidemic entirely manufactured by crony kingpins.

Study Proves Medical Marijuana Can Replace Dangerous Pharmaceuticals

Opponents of medical marijuana laws have often claimed that legalizing marijuana use would lead to rampant drug abuse
and have an adverse effect on society. Now that these laws have been instituted in some states for a few years, however,
evidence is mounting that the opposite is actually true.

In fact, it turns out that medical marijuana is so effective at treating pain that it's keeping many patients off prescription
painkillers, which are a bigger threat to society than marijuana use, medical or otherwise, could ever be.

In a recent study, researchers discovered that Medicare reported savings of $165.2 million in 2013 on the prescription
medications that are used to treat some of the conditions that can also be treated with marijuana.

These included depression, pain, seizures, nausea, glaucoma, anxiety, spasticity and sleep disorders. You may recall that
2013 was the year that 17 states put medical marijuana laws into place, along with the District of Columbia.
These impressive savings accounted for half a percent of the Medicare Part D budget for that year. In the study, all of the
claims for prescriptions filed for the medications in question from 2010 to 2013 by Medicare Part D patients were reviewed.

Decreases were noted in the number of prescriptions that were written for medications other than marijuana for most of the
conditions studied. For example, in states with legal medical marijuana, the prescriptions for pain medications were lower by
a remarkable 1,826 daily doses compared to the states where medical marijuana is not legal.

The researchers estimate that Medicare could have saved $468 million on prescription drugs if every state had a medical
marijuana law in place.

The sole exception was glaucoma, and this could be due to the fact that marijuana's effects on the condition tend to only last
for about an hour. Prescriptions for medicines that marijuana is not used for, such as blood thinners, did not drop.

Researcher Ashley Bradford of the University of Georgia, who was the study's lead author, said: "The results suggest
people are really using marijuana as medicine and not just using it for recreational purposes."

Medical Marijuana Could Alleviate The Nation's Opioid Crisis

This is good news for those suffering with these ailments, with marijuana proving to be a safer alternative to conventional
medicine. Take the example of opioids, a type of painkiller that has been responsible for a slew of deadly overdoses.
A University of Michigan study found that patients with chronic pain who used medical marijuana reported a drop in their use
of prescription opioids amounting to 64 percent. They also reported experiencing fewer side effects, and a 45 percent
improvement in their quality of life since turning to cannabis for pain management.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 40 people die each day from overdosing on these
drugs.

Bad News for Big Pharma

Anything that can steer people away from death-inducing prescription painkillers and other dangerous medications is a very
positive step, no matter what your personal feelings are about marijuana.

Of course, Big Pharma does not share this view, as it threatens their profits, which also explains why they are hoping people
won't catch on to the benefits of CBD oil from hemp for issues such as epilepsy.

Not only is marijuana very effective for many people, but it carries very few side effects, and is often more affordable than
the pills Big Pharma is trying to push on people. This latest study showing that marijuana is replacing dangerous
pharmaceuticals for many people might be bad news for Big Pharma, but it's good news for everybody else.

Why the War on Cannabis?

WHO Publishes Strategies For EU Healthcare Professionals To Convince Vaccine

Deniers Vaccines Are Safe + News On Vaccine Safety Reveals Rampant Corruption
October 14 2016 | From: NaturalBlaze / AustralianNationalReview

Vaccines are taking a big hit on the refusal side from more and more people doing their due
diligence and becoming more fully engaged in knowing what supposedly safe vaccines really are
about: Fraud and deceit on the part of the U.S. CDC and FDA, plus vested-interest tobacco
science from Big Pharma and vaccine manufacturers publishing falsified research and data, who
export their brand of pseudoscience.

Nothing confirms that more than the documentary movie VAXXED currently making the rounds in local movie
theaters and on the Internet.

Related: VAXXED Documentary Explored with Filmmakers on Antidote

In view of the all the developing negative vaccine research and adverse health issues, the World Health Organization
(WHO) apparently is trying to come to vaccines rescue by publishing the 44 page 2016 document, How to respond to vocal
vaccine deniers in public.

What I found most amazing and ironically curious, if not pathetic, is the information on page 34 in Chapter 6 How to
Protect Yourself, referring to the healthcare professional who is encouraged to go out and spread the vaccine
gospel. Paradoxically, the WHO makes the following statement:

"Remember

You have the right to say No. Your personal safety comes first. Consider the context and time of the discussion,
and weigh up whether it is safe for you to take part.

Your mind stores thousands of pieces of information which it uses to warn you that something is wrong. Trust your
instincts when you feel uncomfortable, get away from whatever situation you are in. You will only know if you were
wrong if you ignore your instincts is it worth the risk?"
Apparently, WHO believe doctors have the right of personal safety first, but what are the rights of innocent infants, toddlers,
teens and adults from being forced to be vaccinated immediately after birth and into adulthood with Big Pharmas poison
needles?

Trust your instincts when you feel uncomfortable, get away from whatever situation you are in, is excellent advice to
parents when being badgered about vaccines, I offer.

Related: Vaccines Have Become Even More Scary Than Ever

However, the WHO thinks that only applies to medical proselytizers and not those who are bullied into taking vaccines or
else suffer untold consequences like your families are discharged from their medical practices! Or, how about having Child
Protective Services showing up at a refusers front door?

The WHO apparently has concerns about security threats to healthcare professionals from vaccine refusers. I wonder why,
especially when children have been damaged for life and parents are getting extremely fed up with how they are treated by
the medical and legal professions, healthcare regulatory bodies especially in the USA, e.g., CDC, FDA, state and local
health agencies and even school districts.

On page 6 of that report, we see the Goal stated as:

"Make the public audience more resilient against anti-vaccine statements and stories; support the vaccine
hesitants in their vaccine acceptance decision."

Readers need to read page 9: how the WHO defines various members of the anti-vaccine movement. However, the WHO
does not say anything about all the fines and ethical problems leveled against the pharmaceutical industry because of its
inherent bad business practices that have evolved into class action lawsuits and billion-dollar fines from the U.S. CDC /
FDA!
Related: Flu Vaccines are Toxic

What is it that the WHO doesnt seem to be getting about the problems with the pharmaceutical industry for which it
apparently is one of its key promoters?

Personally, I just love this remark on page 15:

"Remember, you are presenting the scientific consensus."

And that sad statement is KEY, since the REAL science is totally different than consensus science!

Consensus science is that which researchers agree to lie about or withhold data about or even discard data into a trash can
about, e.g., MMR vaccine-Autism connection and CDC whistleblower William Thompson, PhD, admission or perform
incorrect vaccine trials, e.g., placing aluminum adjuvant into control subjects vaccines, when those vaccines should be
adjuvant-free!

Thats consensus science!

Scientific consensus ignores scientific studies, especially when it comes to vaccine ingredients, or so it really
seems. My book Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Dont Know About Vaccines discusses most of the toxic ingredients in
vaccines from what scientific studies have found those ingredients are capable of doing as published in peer review
literature.
Its not what I have made up; its what published scientific journal articles say about neurotoxins, aluminum in as many as
four formulations, ethylmercury (Thimerosal) thats still found in trace amounts in many vaccines given to infants (YES, thats
a real FACT), formaldehyde / Formalin, dangerous polysorbate 80 thats been shown to cause infertility in animal studies
plus other problems, sodium borate plus a shopping list of ingredients such as foreign DNA from animals like monkeys-
mouse brain-cattle-insects, including human diploid cells (a line of aborted fetal cells).

Let me not forget to mention mycoplasmas and genetically modified organisms. How can all that scientific crap be injected
into a less than 25 pound infant and no health damages occur, especially to their not-fully-developed immune system?

Something is terribly wrong with consensus science when it has to bully others into taking harmful products! The WHO
apparently recognizes that and is trying to do damage control for the next pandemic that probably is in the wings. Heres a
hint: Zika. Or, the refugee crisis in the EU.

On page 22 we read the admonition to;

"Emphasize high safety instead of low risk."

How ridiculous a mantra, when each vaccine package insert [2] recites contraindications and adverse events, including
Guillain-Barr syndrome. But then, its consensus science not to tell patients that information as their right under fully
informed consent.
On page 23, proselytizers are cautioned about telling the truth. However, the WHO does not tell them how to keep their
noses from growing two feet long or whats called the Pinocchio syndrome.

On page 24, WHO reiterates the sorry mantra about consensus science:

"11. Underline scientific consensus

Research in the area of climate change shows that the belief in a scientific fact increases when consensus is
highlighted [60][30]. However, identifying a scientific consensus requires a thorough understanding of the specific
area of interest and a layperson will not gain that knowledge all by himself [61].

Therefore, highlighting the scientific consensus in public is a powerful tool to transfer essential scientific knowledge
and increase belief in a scientific fact, especially when presented in a simple and short message [62][63]."

Underline scientific consensus with regard to vaccine safety and efficacy.

Boy, has WHO really placed itself precariously out on the credibility limb its sawing off when it includes climate change as
scientific fact.

With weather geoengineering, Solar Radiation Management, chemtrails, HAARPs around the globe and the information
about smart clouds I discussed thats in the U.S. Air Force report about owning the weather by 2025 in my article Whats
Up With the Newest Presidential Executive Order?, WHO ought to be embarrassed beyond embarrassment, plus be
regarded as the Illuminatis toady it apparently is.

WHO wants proselytizers to Emphasize social benefits of vaccines. Does that mean that herd immunity is not discussed
for what it really is - treating humans like cattle? What are the social benefits of vaccines when lives and families are
damaged?

When there is total denial by doctors and others with almost no recourse at law in the USA because the U.S. Congress
disenfranchised healthcare consumers rights by giving vaccine manufacturers a get out of jail free card from any legal and
financial liability for product damage from vaccines?
Related: Shock Report: Testing Reveals Glyphosate Present in Childhood Vaccines

But things are different in the European Union where lawsuits are being filed against vaccine manufacturers, and thus one of
the probable reasons for WHOs How to respond report.

How about the Algorithm of how to respond on page 29! Studying that algorithm should give everyone some clever hints
on how to respond to the proselytizers, I think.

The WHOs bibliography of References ought to be studied as a strategy play book to use in beating them at their own
game regarding vaccine consensus science, I offer. There are 51 member states in the European Union. The recent
manufactured refugee crisis in the EU probably is of much concern to WHO, since many refugees obviously will need to be
convinced to take those poison needles.

News On Vaccine Safety Reveals Rampant Corruption

When people hear about life threatening conditions such as seizure, cardiovascular ailments and
encephalitis, the first thing that comes to their minds is viruses. These are the harmful side effects
of Gardasil, an HPV vaccine that are given to 9-year-old children.
There are many more vaccines that pose similar health dangers that are being given to children.

Related: Parents of vaccine-damaged children wrongly imprisoned, as doctors blame 'shaken baby syndrome'

NaturalNews Talk Hour reveals the harmful side effects of vaccination with PhD scholars Judy Mikovits and
Jonathan Landsman that our government doesnt want you to know.

Dr Mikovits feels that the possibility of latent viruses released into the system in the form of vaccines can be unleashed due
to the response of dendritic cells in our body, which release inflammatory messages to cytokines, triggering inflammation.
She terms this response as cytokine storm.

The Shocking Truth About Mandatory Vaccines Revealed

This response of the body could lead to permanent damage to the bodys immune system, which would ultimately lead to a
lifetime of diseases.

The body can have very severe effects from vaccination, a phenomenon known as vaccine injuries. Diseases like myalgic
encephalomyelitis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, autism and polycystic ovarian syndrome can also be caused
by vaccine injuries.
Related: Vaccine for Flu Has 25000 Times More Mercury Concentration Than Drinking Water

The government has always hidden the harmful effects of vaccination on the grounds of coincidence or no specific reason.
Some members of the health administration have even gone as far as saying that the after effects of vaccination are actually
psychogenic in nature.

Dr Mikovits new publication, Plague, draws to the many responses that the government have, or have had for vaccine side
effects.

The side effects arent just caused by the antigens present in the vaccines. The additives used in most vaccines to
trigger immune response are also very toxic in nature and are equally harmful to our system, if not more.

The alternative media is flooded with the singular admission of a whistleblower at the CDC that lab results were
faked. The alternative media is flooded with 127 papers on the connection of thimerosal with autism.

Here we have a 188 page document with nothing but references to articles DATING BACK TO 1926 WHEN
ALUMINUM WAS FIRST USED AS AN ADJUVANT IN VACCINES to the present day with a bloom that was
noticed in articles around 1999 when Scientific American had an article called GENETIC VACCINES as noted in
my book Timeline.

What we are talking about here makes the recent British expose on the cover-up of vaccine science look like
neighborhood kids playing in the sandbox.

Credit to the Red Hens who discovered it @ www.vaccinefraud.com

The use of of ingredients like Polysorbate 80, which have detergent properties, has also been discovered.
Vaccines also have amounts of inflammatory additives and neurotoxins such as MPL and aluminium hydroxide respectively.

Related: Vaccines containing aluminum shown to cause neurological damage

Borax, a sodium compound present in vaccines, depletes important micronutrients from the body such as zinc, magnesium
and calcium. Dr Mikovits also reveals that vaccinations should not be given to children under 3 years, as it affects brain
development.

Dr Mikovits is a pioneer in the field of immunology and a PhD scholar from George Washington University.

Related Articles:
U.S. Federal Court Rules Autism & Brain Damage Caused By Big Pharma Vaccine!

Big Pharma developing baby vaccines for PREGNANT women

Toddler injected with 37 vaccines before the age of two left paralyzed and wheelchair-bound for life

How much money do pediatricians really make from vaccines?

Lead developer of HPV vaccine admits it's a giant, deadly scam

Dispelling Vaccination Myths

San Antonio district attorney states 'Vaccines cause autism'

Prominent District Attorney Blames Vaccines for His Childrens Autism

Press Release: Vaccine Safety Documentary Pulled from East End Film Festival Amid Outside Pressure

BANNED Man Made Epidemic Film Available Online

Out Of Hand: More People Are Using More Devices More Often Than Ever Before -
Increasingly, Thats A Pain Point
October 10 2016 | From: Buzzfeed

For Cassandra Smolcic, the trouble began at her dream internship. Handpicked to spend a summer
working on movies at Pixar, the 26-year-old logged marathon hours, and more than a few all-
nighters, at her computer and tablet.
At first, she managed to ignore the mysterious pinching sensations in her hands and forearms. But by the time her
internship ended and a full-time job offer rolled in, she could barely move her fingers.

For Skylar, a 12-year-old in South Florida who loves her laptop, phone, and tablet, the breaking point came at the start of
sixth grade last fall. Suddenly her neck, shoulders, and back felt strained whenever she rolled her head, as if invisible hands
were yanking muscles apart from the inside. All her neck-rolling, she worried, made her look like she was trying to cheat off
someones test.

To be a perpetually plugged-in, emailing, texting, sexting, swiping, Snapchatting, selfie-taking human being in 2016, a little
thumb twinge is the price of admission. There are the media-anointed outliers: the Candy Crusher with a ruptured thumb
tendon, the woman who over-texted her way to WhatsAppitis.

And then there are people like the 18-year-old woman who said;

If Im scrolling down Tumblr for more than half an hour, my fingers will get sore.

When I hold my phone, a 22-year-old complained, cradling her iPhone in her palm, my bottom finger really
hurts.

A 30-year-old software engineer said his fingers naturally curl inwards, claw-like: I remember my hand did not
quite use to be like that.

Amy Luo, 27, suspects her iPhone 6s is partly to blame for the numbness in her right thumb and wrist.

Compared with her old iPhone, she said, you have to stretch a lot more, and its heavier.

Dr. Patrick Lang, a San Francisco hand surgeon, sees more and more twenty- and thirtysomething tech
employees with inexplicable debilitating pain in their upper limbs. I consider it like an epidemic, he
said, particularly in this city.

To be clear, no one knows just how bad this epidemic is. At best, we learn to endure our stiff necks and throbbing thumbs.
At worst, a generation of people damage their bodies without realizing it.

In all likelihood, we are somewhere in the middle, between perturbance and public health crisis, but for the time being we
simply dont - cant - know what all these machines will do to our bodies in the long term, especially in the absence of
definitive research.
What we do know is that now more people are using multiple electronics - cell phones, smartphones, tablets, laptops,
desktops - for more hours a day, starting at ever earlier ages.

But we werent built for them.

Growing up in the Rust Belt city of Greensburg, Pennsylvania, Smolcic was the kid who was always sketching characters
from movies and cartoons. And in her adolescent years in the 90s, computers became an important tool for honing her
artistic talents: She made clip-art greeting cards and banners, and high school newspaper layouts, on desktop computers.

At Susquehanna University, she went all in on graphic design as a career after she took a computer arts course on a whim.

That meant long hours on various iMacs, and even more screen time when she went on to earn a masters in graphic design
at the Savannah College of Art and Design. Over the years, shes also carried a flip phone, a Motorola Razr, a Dell laptop,
and, at the moment, a MacBook Pro and an iPhone 6s.

Machines were crucial to Smolcics burgeoning artistic career, as they are to so many of our lives. But itd be hard to call
them human-friendly.

Consider the minimum biomechanics needed to work a smartphone. Put aside all the other risks - of getting depressed and
lonely; of sacrificing sleep, hearing, eyesight, and focus; of dying while snapping selfies on cliffs, or texting
while walking or driving. The act of just using the thing is precarious.
Our heads sit atop our necks and line up with our shoulders and arms, just as a two-footed species should. But a forward-
leaning head shakes up this graceful arrangement: The upper body drifts back, the hips tilt forward, and pretty much
everything else - the spine, the nerves below the neck, the upper limb muscles - tightens up.

Slouching is all too easy when we hold a phone in our outstretched hand or reach for a mouse. When we type on our
laptops cross-legged or sprawled on our stomachs, our necks and shoulders strain from leaning into the low screens. (Yes,
as counterintuitive as it sounds, you probably shouldnt put a laptop on your lap.)

Our hands are uniquely capable of grasping objects, a useful trait for our branchswinging primate ancestors. Especially
remarkable are our opposable thumbs, free to flex, extend, curl, and press in all sorts of directions. But their inherently
unstable joints didnt evolve to be constantly pushed beyond their range of motion. Yet they are when we flick through our
phones or, worse, tablets.

To Dr. Robert Markison, its clear: Virtually none of Silicon Valleys inventions, from the clunky Macintosh 128K of 1984 to
the sleek iPhone 7, have been designed with respect for the human form. Markison is a San Francisco surgeon who
depends on his hands to operate on other peoples hands.
He so believes in technologys potential to harm - and treats so many young startup workers who confirm that suspicion -
that he almost exclusively uses voice recognition software. He also has his own line of smartphone styluses that double as
pens, with colorful barrels made of manually mixed pigments, pressure-cast resin, and hand-dyed silk.

On a recent afternoon in his office, Markison asked me to make a fist around a grip strength measurement tool, with my
thumb facing the ceiling. It felt powerful, easy.

Then he had me turn my palm to the floor, the keyboarding stance of a white-collar worker, and do the same thing; my grip
immediately lost a noticeable amount of strength.

Theres no reason to think a mouse is a good idea, Markison said.

Of course, many people with office jobs probably suspect that already. During the 80s and 90s, when computers - then also
known as video display terminals - invaded workplaces around the world, employees felt their arms and fingers go numb,
and headlines warned of the harm these newfangled devices appeared to be inflicting.

In the early 90s, telephone operators, journalists, clerical workers, and employees from other fields filed hundreds of
lawsuits against the manufacturers of equipment such as computer keyboards, which they blamed for severe arm, wrist, and
hand injuries.

All that worry woke a generation up to the physical (and psychological) toll of automated, ultra-efficient work. Then came
furniture and appliances to align technology with our bodies.

Ergonomic mice are gripped vertically, and foot mice save clicks.
Slanted and split keyboards let hands relax. Desks convert to a standing position or have adjustable split levels for monitors
and keyboards. Some software transcribes speech, other software alerts your boss when you type too fast.

But these inventions have been largely for desktops. The dizzying rise of cell phones, tablets, and laptops, fueled by the
rush to make screens ever more portable and ubiquitous, have all but left human-centered design principles in the dust.

Chances are good youre reading this on your phone. In fact, chances are good your phone was the first thing you looked
at this morning and the last thing you looked at last night.

Wake up to a phone alarm. Scroll, bleary-eyed, through email, texts, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram. Field more news and
email on your phone on public transit (or, er, in the car).

Sit behind a computer of some kind at work or school. All day your buzzing phone demands to be held, whether youre out
to lunch or, admit it, on the toilet.

Come reverse commute, youre once again head down on your phone, or an e-reader, until you finally take a break at home
- by watching Game of Thrones on your laptop or tablet. Bonus points if you play Words With Friends while you do it.
Related: Companies Develop Safe Screens That Filter Blue Light Emitted By Electronic Devices

Scientists dont definitively know how all this activity affects our bodies. While some studies link hand ailments to
heavy computer and video game use, far fewer have examined new devices like smartphones.

The phones have only been out 10 to 15 years at best, said Jack Dennerlein, who directs the Occupational
Biomechanics and Ergonomics Laboratory at Harvard University.

We havent had the long-term exposures to start seeing some of the more chronic issues that come up later in
life.

No reliable measurement of technology-related ailments exists. The closest thing is an annual survey of workplace injuries
by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, whose data suggests that cases of musculoskeletal disorders, including carpal tunnel
syndrome, have dropped over the last two decades.

But these figures are at best a very crude measure of problems, said Dr. Kurt Hegmann, who directs the University of
Utahs Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health. As Dennerlein put it: Theyre better than
nothing.

Hegmann offers some theories for why the numbers are shrinking: High-risk jobs like manufacturing are decreasing.
Panicked workers in the 90s likely reported nonexistent ailments before the hysteria subsided. Some offices may have
became more ergonomic.

And there are other reasons the numbers are probably off: Non-work-related factors like obesity can contribute to carpal
tunnel, and if youre constantly sending work emails but also Instagramming for fun, its hard to blame your sore hand on
work alone.
However widespread phone-linked injuries may or may not be, a small cluster of studies suggests that they are real. A
2011 study of nearly 140 mobile device users linked internet time to right thumb pain, as well as overall screen time to right
shoulder and neck discomfort.

Another found that smartphone overuse enlarges the nerve involved in carpal tunnel, causes thumb pain, and hinders the
hands ability to do things like pinch.

Upright, an adults head puts about a dozen pounds of force on the spine, according to a 2014 paper. But tilted 15 degrees,
as if over a phone, the force surges to 27 pounds, and to 60 pounds at 60 degrees. (Thats the weight of four Thanksgiving
turkeys.)

Its harmful when youre younger, because the bones are still malleable and pliable and they may be disformed
permanently, said New York spinal surgeon Dr. Kenneth Hansraj, who wrote the paper after treating a
patient head down in his iPad, playing Angry Birds four hours a day.

Older people can suffer too, he said, because their spines are prone to narrowing, making them susceptible to
injury.

But the doctor insists hes no cell phone basher.

I love the ability to have a cup of coffee and contact 10 of my friends in 10 countries with one text and say, I love
this coffee, he said.

Im just saying, my message is to keep your head up and be cognizant of where your head is in space.

Skylar started using an iPad a couple years ago to watch movies in the car.

Then, at age 10, she got a MacBook Air and a rose-gold iPhone 6s, says her mother, who requested to withhold her last
name to protect her identity.

Game-playing, filming lip-sync sessions, Snapchatting weird faces, checking Instagram, FaceTiming, and texting, not to
mention doing homework on the computer, keep Skylar busy three hours or so a day.

Recently, she discovered Friends, a show about a group of friends that do a lot of weird things and they always meet up at
every single day at Central Perk. Its a coffee shop.

When the Pew Research Center surveyed teens in 2011, one-quarter had smartphones. In 2015, three-quarters did.
According to Common Sense Media, a San Francisco nonprofit that surveyed more than 2,600 young people across the US
last year, 8- to 12-year-olds log nearly two hours a day on tablets, smartphones, and other mobile devices.

And the habit starts even younger: 38% of children under 2 have played games or watched videos on a mobile
device.

Even lower-income teens, who are less likely to own the latest gadgets, may be catching up to their wealthier peers: In a
2015 study of 350 children under age 5 in a low-income community in Philadelphia, most already had their own mobile
device, and in fact had started using one before their first birthday.

Its not like an hour that goes by I dont check my phone, unless Im asleep, you know, said Kendall Holle, 15.

Its bad. Its bad. As soon as I wake up, open my eyes, brush my teeth, wash my face, Im on my phone, making
snaps.

I wake up and I start snapping, said Jeff Ren, 19.

When my phone got taken away, confessed Sara, 15, I cracked.

I just dont feel normal without my phone on me now, said Howard Lin, 18. It would just feel like somethings
missing.

But researchers arent studying how so much gadget exposure, so young, affects childrens physiology - at least not to the
degree theyre studying how it affects their learning, playing, and thinking.
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that children under age 2 avoid screen time completely, and that older
children have no more than two hours a day. After more than 15 years, its now rethinking these guidelines.

In a world where screen time is becoming simply time, our policies must evolve or become obsolete, it has
explained.

When I asked if physical risks were being weighed along with social and psychological ones, Dr. Ari Brown, whos
leading the overhaul of the recommendations, told me by email that the particular question you are asking is
not being addressed by our group.

Meanwhile, people like Diane Cho didnt see the pain coming and dont know what will happen next.

At the news site she recently left, Cho spent her days typing 10 hours at a time, mostly on a laptop, and reading her phone -
until her right arm went periodically numb, immune to icing.

A huge reason why I wanted a career change was literally my arm was falling apart, she said. My body was just
aching. Shes 26.
 George McIntire, 27, occasionally sees his right thumb act up: It starts twitching back and forth, its shivering, and
its going really fast too.

Tanner Bell, a 17-year-old who makes DIY craft videos on YouTube and helps companies digitally market to teens,
feels his thumbs cramp twice a week.

It doesnt even happen when Im holding it, it could happen later on in the day or night, he said. Theres an extra
tension sort of like a tingling.

After trading volleys of texts with a long-distance girlfriend, Vincent Hennerty, 26, ended up with early-stage carpal tunnel.
Cutting back on video games was annoying, as was doing push-ups on his knuckles.

Still, nothing could prepare him for what one might call the ultimate sacrifice.

When I was with girls, he recalled, I would either have to finger them less during sexual intercourse or messing
around, or Id have to be in a position where my wrists were completely straight.

This, he said, weighed on me the most: I need to stop texting.

When neck rubs and ice packs didnt soothe Skylars stiff neck, her mother took her to Dean Fishman, a local chiropractor
and physical therapist. He sees so many people like her that in 2009 he started the Text Neck Institute outside Fort
Lauderdale, Florida.

The clinic now handles 700 visits a month, he says.

 I started to notice very early on, when texting started to become popular as far as communicating goes, that I was
seeing more and more younger people coming in with complaints we hadnt seen before - headaches, neck pain,
arm pain, said Fishman, whose youngest patient so far has been a 3-year-old iPad-loving girl. So-called text
neck is not a blunt force trauma, he said.

Youre not going to see a lot of bulging or herniated discs overnight. Over time, its going to be microtraumas that
end up being a bigger symptom for our patients.

Patients are utterly, unnervingly unaware of their own bodies.

When these younger people are in the middle of studying on their digital device, or if theyre in the middle of
gaming or the excitement of texting with their friends, they dont perceive pain, Fishman said.

Its not until they put it down, lay down at night, and feel pain, and dont attribute it to what theyve been doing
during the day.

Cyrene Quiamco is not a patient, but has all the markings of a future one.

I dont even know when I dont check Snapchat, said the 27-year-old, who Snapchats for brands like MTV, Jolly
Ranchers, Pixar, and Disneyland - and charges $10,000 to $30,000 per Story.

Its like, Im in a restaurant, and then I dont spend all of the time Im there (on Snapchat), but then I spend five
minutes checking whats in my Snapchat feed. Its not one sitting, its various sittings throughout the day.

How many texts does she send a day? Oh gosh, more than a thousand. She added, I never actually thought
about how many that would be.

Two to three hours a day, Quiamco draws colorful, detailed cartoons for Snapchat on her phone.

Youre so focused on creating it because you dont want to stop, even when a pang runs up her forearm, she
 said. I tell my mom, Hey, Im getting hand cramps by using the phone. She says, Youre going to develop
something. If you lose your hand, thats everything.

She laughed.

As a 6-year-old, Smolcic fell in love with The Little Mermaid. As a grown-up graphic designer at Pixar, across the bay from
San Francisco, she got to make her own mark on films like Monsters University, Cars 2, and Finding Dory. For Toy Story 3,
she crafted the logo of pink teddy bear and chief antagonist Lots-o-Huggin Bear; for the Scotland-set Brave, she whipped
up Celtic patterns for furniture and costumes.

Meetings with famous directors and other pinch me moments overflowed during her five years there.

Theres just all those amazing little life lessons buried into the entertainment aspect of it that do make an impact
on people, she said of Pixars movies. It felt special to be part of that.

Despite the grueling hours, Smolcic didnt seriously believe that hand injuries could be a hazard of the trade. But once the
aches arrived, they stayed.

Even when she felt normal after a monthlong break, the stabbing sensations would flare up when she jumped back into
work. Pixar was supportive, she said, and gave her an elaborate work station with a motorized standing and sitting desk, a
sideways mouse, programmable foot pedals, ergonomic chairs, extra monitors, and a tablet sensitive to touch.

Doctors and specialists put her through one treatment after another, some less conventional than others: acupuncture,
acupressure, breathwork, massages, physical therapy, personal training, biofeedback, myofascial release, NeuroKinetic
Therapy, reflexology, naturopathy.
According to some of her many medical professionals, her diagnosis was fibromyalgia, a musculoskeletal pain disorder.
Others called it a repetitive strain injury.

Thats probably the first term that comes to mind for these types of impairments. But occupational health experts shy away
from it because it lumps together a lot of different ailments. Take carpal tunnel syndrome: A compressed nerve in your
forearm numbs and weakens your hand.

But painful thumb tendons, the cord-like structures that link muscle to bone, might mean de Quervain syndrome. Tendinitis
(inflamed tendons) shouldnt be confused with trigger finger (inflammation around a tendon). And for anything too vague or
early-stage to neatly fit a diagnosis, theres the handy label of nonspecific pain.

To make things more confusing, none of these injuries can be easily blamed on technology. You can fiddle with gadgets
your whole life without a sore thumb. Or your ailment can build over years, making it hard to know whether gadgets are the
sole cause.

Recovery, too, varies. All you may need to do is vigilantly sit up straight and take breaks, whereas others would need
anything from a steroid shot to surgery.

These nuances can confound primary care physicians, who dont necessarily know when to refer patients to specialists -
who in turn dont always have all the answers either.

People go to the hand surgeons, who are frustrated because theyre not surgical patients, so they send them to
therapy, said Melanie Johnke, who runs Golden Gate Hand Therapy in San Francisco. And Im not a doctor,
either, meaning she cant make official diagnoses or prescribe medications.

As Savir put it: If I go to the doctor, what is he going to say? Dont hold your phone that way. Whats the point?

Despite knowing everything we should do, from sitting straight and stretching to taking breaks and using a phone stylus,
we probably dont and wont follow suit. And maybe thats just how things are now. Maybe only technology can save us from
ourselves.

Tech giants like Apple, Google, and Microsoft are racing to turn their machines into mind readers. Every swipe saved, every
frictionless convenience engineered, keeps us coming back for more: Its a business strategy that also happens to be
ergonomically friendly.

Speech recognition software - Siri, OK Google, Alexa, Dragon - promises to take the manual labor out of internet browsing
and looking up directions.
But it doesnt work perfectly, which isnt news to anyone whos yelled at Siri, and its still kind of weird, frankly, to talk to your
phone in public.

Im in a shared office space, and I dont know how that would work out, said Saima Jamshed, 42, who has
chronic pain in her right arm.

Then there are the machine learningpowered apps that, seemingly magically, cue up the next word in your message,
person to call, or video to watch, based on your past activity and keystrokes.

See (as of last week) Googles new messaging app Allo, which comes with prepackaged responses and predictive texts. But
accepting their help does require sacrificing privacy to an unsettling degree.
Related: Whatever You Do, Do Not Use Google Allo: Snowden

Of course, we could also use technology less. We certainly seem to want to. Virtually all 30 or so people who spoke to me
wished they could leave their phones at home, stop refreshing their notifications, watch less YouTube. Asked to guess how
much time this all amounted to, they answered: too much.

Cutting back would almost definitely be healthier. But we may not be willing to do that.

Skylar has almost fully recovered, thanks to physical therapy at the Text Neck Institute and exercises at home. Her mother
says shes diligent about setting her devices at eye level (and telling everyone else to as well), just like the doctor told her to.
But she isnt actually cutting back on screen time.

The peer pressure is intense: All her friends have phones, and some have iPads and computers.

Sometimes it gets annoying when I go to a friends house and all we do is play on our phone or watch something
on our iPad, Skylar said. I went to their house to play with them or hang out with them, not just go on our
electronics and be silent the whole time.

When I was growing up, her mother, Kerri, recalled, the phone was in the house, so if you left the house, the
phone rang and somebody would call you later. It was a non-negotiable break when the world had to accept that
you were physically untethered from your device. Now, Kerri said, its just everywhere.

Smolcic has largely disconnected from technology, just not by choice.

When she was 28, a pain management specialist gave her the devastating news: She would never fully recover. She hung
on for a few more years, but finally left in October 2014 for a San Francisco design agency where, she hoped, her role
would be less hands-on. I really felt like Id tried everything I could, she said.

But the work and pain remained more or less the same, so this March, she left the agency, and design, for the foreseeable
future. Her lifes work hurt.
Since then, shes been using money saved up to travel through Hong Kong, Greece, and Iceland, with stops to see
shamans and alternative healers in Indonesia, Thailand, and Mexico. Shes also writing, which she now believes to be her
true calling.

Composing an 1,800-word essay this spring - through a combination of typing and recording voice memos - took a month
and a half because she could only work for an hour a day. Now she says she can write for several hours at a time with
almost no pain, and shes working on a memoir partly about her injuries.

At 33, Smolcic believes that shes 90% recovered. She cant be sure its permanent - but even if so, she no longer wants a
trade design job.

I think Id be okay with not having a lot of the luxuries I had in my San Francisco life, she said, as a trade for
having more time to be actively living and out in the world, as opposed to being behind a desk.

But despite all that she believes technology has cost her, physically and emotionally, Smolcic hasnt been able to resist
turning to her iPhone and MacBook on the road this year.

They are a source of directions and travel tips, an outlet for writing and music, a camera to record memories, a line of
communication to friends and family. These machines, she wrote to me this summer, put so much power at my
fingertips. And now that shes feeling better, she uses them all the time.
The Flawed Germ Theory; Unfortunately The Basis Of Modern Medicine
October 8 2016 | From: Tbyil

Ever wonder why modern medicine is not helping the populations of the western world to become
healthier? Maybe the foundation for health is wrong.

Pasteur's germ theory of disease has helped forward the one germ for one disease concept that has raised Big
Pharma to the wealthy business of developing drugs for one germ to purportedly cure one disease while causing
autoimmune and chronic diseases to flourish from destroyed immune systems.

Related:The Medical Dictatorship of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, England and the USA

Germ phobia, here comes the flu, get your flu shots or you may wind up as one of the 36,000 who manage to die from it
each year according to the CDC. It's never more, never less - 36,000 deaths each flu season. Isn't there something fishy
about that?

Then get out the antibiotics for every case of the sniffles. Don't forget the pharmaceutical antiviral Tamiflu, expensive, not so
effective, and dangerous. The germ theory has turned out to be great for the pharmaceutical business model.
Related: Patients at risk and billions of dollars being wasted because of tests, scans and procedures that don't
work

Now we have those nasty mosquitoes carrying the Zika virus, which has no real history of being problematic. So spray
everything and everyone with toxic chemicals that do cause disease. And let's not forget those new vaccines. Over a billion
dollars of government money has been recently set aside for Zika virus research and vaccines.

Why the Germ Theory is Flawed

The following quote is used by Dr. Robert O. Young in his book Sick and Tired?: Reclaim Your Inner Terrain:

If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat - diseased tissue
- rather than being the cause of the diseased tissue; e.g., mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but do not cause
the pool to become stagnant.

- Dr. Rudolph Virchow (Father of Pathology 1821 - 1902)

Related:Shocking Report from Medical Insiders: a shocking amount of published research is unreliable at best, if
not completely false, as in, fraudulent

Pasteur was the original scammer of the germ theory, not considered a worthy scientist by his peers. But he had good
press. Media bias and corruption are nothing new.

Other scientists, especially Claude Bernard, claimed the inner terrain, which includes overall and organ specific pH levels
and all facets of the immune system countered Pasteur's one germ for one disease theory with claims of pleomorphism
within damaged or diseased tissue, which the Medical Mafia and Big Pharma refused to acknowledge.

Pleomorphism was proven when Royal Raymond Rife's universal microscope in the late 1930s revealed structural changes
in microbes, up to 16, according their host's environment. Microbes can start out as benign then alter themselves to
survive if one's inner terrain is unhealthy.
In other words, inflammation and tissue degeneration with acidic pH levels attract pathogenic microbes or encourage
existing ones into morphing as pathogenic microbes if already present and harmless or even beneficial. The germ theory
hoax is the basis of modern pharmaceutical medicine and killing good food with pasteurization and irradiation.

Not only do our highly acidic junk and processed foods with add sugars promote acidic pH levels under 7.3, so do
overworking, stress, and anger. The combination of our environmental toxic load and inadequate nutrition lead to the
stagnant pools within our tissues that become the breeding grounds for existing or new pathogenic microbes to thrive.

Detoxing and seeking fresh whole foods with the proper supplements offer more disease protection from germs than all the
vaccines in the world.
Vaccinations offer the following tradeoffs for thwarting germs: Death, lifelong disability, or most commonly
autoimmune disease vulnerability.

Haven't you noticed? Autoimmune diseases and allergies have risen with the rise in vaccination schedules.

There have been studies in the USA among Amish children and in Europe among those raised on small dairy farms that
demonstrate how being exposed to germs at an early age exercises the immune system and make it stronger, thus
rendering natural immunization.

This is where rude, crude, over the top and hilarious George Carlin comes in:

Another Reason to Not Trust the CDC's Fear Mongering

Sharyl Attkinson was the news producer for CBS's Washington Bureau. During the Swine Flu pandemic of 2008-9, she
was intent at getting to the truth of just how much of an epidemic it really was. Sharyl, who is now independent with her own
website and her book Stonewalled in circulation, questioned the authenticity of the CDC's reportage on incidents of Swine
Flu.

Related: Sharyl Attkinson On The Hypnotic Power Of Germ Propaganda

After being stonewalled by the CDC with her Freedom of Information (FOI) requests for detailed statistics on the Swine Flu,
she and her CBS Washington Bureau news staff did an end around they went directly to state health departments and
discovered only a very few flu cases, mostly single digit numbers, tested positive for Swine Flu.

Those numbers were not nearly enough to justify claims of a level 6 pandemic, considered the most severe and
dangerous international pandemic level.

Then the CDC attempted damage control by announcing they had stopped counting because there were millions of Swine
Flu cases and they couldn't keep up with it.
Related: Flu Vaccines are Toxic

Wow, if the first lie doesn't work then tell a bigger one, even if it doesn't make any sense at all. This incident forced Sharyl
out of mainstream news. Can't question the CDC on mainstream TV.

You're better off sticking with alternative media and holistic health approaches for establishing a stronger immune system by
lessening your toxic chemical load and increasing your nutritional level with organic foods and supplements.

See also:

Louis Pasteur, Antoine Bechamp and the True Causes of Disease

Modern Medicine: How Healing Illness became Managing Symptoms for Profit

Nutrition And Mental Health + ADHD Is A Fabricated Disease, Says Reputed

Neurologist
October 5 2016 | From: BePure / Sott

Last week I attended a conference by Dr Julia Rucklidge from the University of Canterbury where
she presented her groundbreaking research on the treatment of mental health disorders such as
ADHD, bipolar, depression and anxiety using therapeutic doses of micronutrients.
More and more we are seeing that what we eat, and what we absorb from our food choices, affect more than our
physical appearance and physical fitness.

Related: Nutrition And Mental Health

Yes these things are important, but actually there are numerous benefits to eating a nutrient-dense diet with supporting
products that dont get mentioned. And they should. Our mental health is something that affects every interaction we have
with ourselves, our families, our work colleagues and our friends.

The takeaway message from this conference is the prevalence of mental health problems in the modern world is
concerning. According to Dr Rucklidge:

There is a very real danger of mental health care bankrupting our society in terms of cost and social implications.

In this blog Im going to address the link between nutrition and mental health. There are many other factors involved in the
prevention and treatment of mental illness. We are only addressing nutrition in this blog as it is such an important factor to
consider.

The Whole Picture

One in ten New Zealanders are on antidepressants. This is an eight-fold increase in total prescription numbers from 1998.

There has been a four-fold increase in claimed disability financial support due to psychiatric disorders in New Zealand from
1991 to now. Both these figures are supplied through Statistics New Zealands annual reports.
Related: Getting Real About What Depression IS and ISN'T

In a period of time where more cutting edge medicines have been researched, developed and trialled on our population,
rates of mental health disorders continue to rise.

The long term results from the National Institute of Mental Healths (NIMH) MTA study found that children taking medication
for ADHD for longer than 24 months showed significant markers not of beneficial outcome, but of deterioration medicated
children were also slightly smaller, and higher delinquency scores. Source: The MTA cooperative randomised clinical trial.

Its fair to say our current gold standards are not working, so what else has changed in this time period?

Food And Stress

This increase in mental health conditions follows the same exponential rise of obesity and type two diabetes from the 1970s
to now. We know that the rise in medical knowledge and the availability of medications hasnt resolved the problem, nor has
a 300% increase in gym memberships, so what has changed to negatively affect our mental and metabolic health?
Related: A Mind of Your Own with Guest Dr. Kelly Brogan

I firmly believe, and the evidence supports this idea, that what we are eating and the nutrients we give to our bodies
drastically affect our weight, energy, metabolic health AND mental health in both negative and positive ways.

For many people gluten, refined grains and sugar can cause problems affecting everything from digestion, mood, skin
disorders like rashes and eczema, to joint pain, weight gain, migraines, thyroid disorders, mental health disorders and
behavioural issues such as ADHD.

For an extensive list of gluten-related symptoms, check out this list.

Gluten is a protein found in wheat, barley, and rye, and is what gives bread its stretch. Many nutritionists now believe many
people - not just those with gluten intolerance or Celiac Disease - should avoid gluten as it is a known contributor to leaky
gut.
Related: Simple changes to your diet can help with mental health issues

This is problematic for mental health conditions because if serotonin is not kept within your gut and digestive tract, it cannot
engage in chemical reactions within your brain to increase your mood.

Refined grains and sugar cause blood sugar spikes and energy crashes as insulin is produced to mitigate the quick rush of
glucose and fructose. You can read in length about the problem with refined grains and sugar.

Lastly, the stress of modern living has a huge impact on our mental health. Cortisol is a stress hormone that is activated by
everything from traffic, fighting with a loved one, worry, anxiety, excessive caffeine intake and even exercise. Cortisol
initiates our fight or flight response in our nervous system. In ancestral times this response was necessary for fleeing from
danger.
Related: Sadness: The Problem and The Solution

In the modern world, we perceive danger to be everywhere (i.e we release cortisol) despite the fact we arent running away
from a lion. This constant flood of cortisol prevents our rest and digest nervous system from operating. This prevents
recovery from exercise or the days stressors, the production of growth hormone and serotonin as well as preventing sleep
and digestion.

Managing stress is critical for those people with mental health concerns.

The Brain Gut Connection

Current research in the field of microbiome health and mental health conditions confirms the theory our stomach is our
second brain. There are several reasons for this. The first is Serotonin.

Related: What Does Your Illness Mean?

Serotonin is your happiness hormone. It is a neurotransmitter that relays messages from all areas of your brain to your cells.
An imbalance or deficiency in serotonin is thought to influence the brain in a way that causes depression.

Up to 70% of your bodies total serotonin lives in your digestive tract. If you have leaky gut, a food intolerance or gut
dysbiosis through poor diet or antibiotic use, the serotonin can leak out of your gut and is then unable to do its job in your
brain.

The second factor has to do with the nutritional and energy demands of our brains. Our brains are approximately 2% of our
body weight. However, it consumes 20-40% of our metabolism. In other words, it is constantly and disproportionately
demanding nutrients and oxygen. One litre of blood enters your brain every minute, carrying whatever nutrients it has
access to.

Giving it nutrient dense food and access to as many nutrients as possible is critical for mental health.

So What Can We Do?

Dr Rucklidges research suggests we need to ensure good nutrient-density in our diets and use therapeutic doses of
micronutrients to support mental health conditions.
Related: 5 Stages of Transformation

Micronutrients such as zinc, vitamin D, Essential Fatty Acids and many more have been used in many open label
trials across anxiety, sleep issues, bipolar disorder and ADHD.

All have shown significant reductions in psychiatric and psychological symptoms. Response rates range from 50-
80% improvements."

Source: Dr Julia Rucklidge at the University of Canterbury.

The current medical model seeks to use medication first before addressing stress, food, sleep and nutrient deficiencies. I
would personally love to see this equation flipped. If we can address dietary and lifestyle factors first, along with nutrient
support, while using medication sparingly on a case-by-case basis, we can greatly improve the mental health of our nation.

If you or a loved one are currently struggling with depression-like symptoms, bipolar ADHD or anxiety please seek
assistance. You can contact your GP or health care provider, the BePure team at
info@bepure.co.nz, www.depression.org.nz or the depression helpline at 0800 111 757.

Related: German psychologists declare "the drugs don't work"

Renowned Harvard Psychologist Calls ADHD A Fraud That Only Benefits The
Pharmaceutical Industry

Viewed by academics as one of the most influential psychologists of the 20th century, Jerome
Kagan ranked above Carl Jung (the founder of analytical psychology) and Ivan Pavlov (who
discovered the Pavlovian reflex) in a 2002 American Psychological Association ranking of the
eminent psychologists.

He is well-known for his pioneering work in developmental psychology at Harvard University, where he has spent
decades documenting how babies and small children grow, and is an exceptional and highly-regarded researcher.

So it may be surprising to learn that he believes the diagnosis of ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) is
an invention - and only benefits the pharmaceutical industry and psychiatrists.

Mislabeling Mental Illness

"That is the history of humanity: Those in authority believe they're doing the right thing, and they harm those who
have no power", says Jerome Kagan.

In an interview with Spiegel, Kagan addressed the skyrocketing rates of ADHD in America, which he attributes to "fuzzy
diagnostic practices."

He illustrated his point with the following example:

Say fifty years ago you have a 7-year-old who is bored in school and exhibits disruptive behavior. Back then, he would be
labeled as lazy. But today, that same child is said to suffer from ADHD. That's why we've seen such a dramatic increase in
the disorder.

Every child who is having problems in school is sent to see a pediatrician, who then claims it's ADHD and
prescribes Ritalin.
 "In fact, 90 percent of these 5.4 million kids don't have an abnormal dopamine metabolism. The problem is,
if a drug is available to doctors, they'll make the corresponding diagnosis," he said.

"We could get philosophical and ask ourselves: "What does mental illness mean?"

If you do interviews with children and adolescents aged 12 to 19, then 40 percent can be categorized as anxious or
depressed.

But if you take a closer look and ask how many of them are seriously impaired by this, the number shrinks to 8 percent.

Describing every child who is depressed or anxious as being mentally ill is ridiculous.

Adolescents are anxious, that's normal. They don't know what college to go to. Their boyfriend or girlfriend just
stood them up. Being sad or anxious is just as much a part of life as anger or sexual frustration," Kagan told
Spiegel.

What are the implications for the millions of children who are inaccurately diagnosed as mentally ill? Kagan believes it's
devastating because they think there is something fundamentally wrong with them.

He's not the only psychologist to raise the alarm about this trend, but Kagan and others feel they're up against:

"An enormously powerful alliance: pharmaceutical companies that are making billions, and a profession
that is self-interested."

Kagan himself suffered from inner restlessness and stuttering as a child, but his mother told him: "There's nothing wrong
with you. Your mind is working faster than your tongue." He thought at the time: "Gee, that's great, I'm only stuttering
because I'm so smart." If he had been born in the present era, he most likely would have been classified as mentally ill.

Jerome Kagan

ADHD isn't the only mental illness epidemic among children that worries Kagan, depression is another.

In 1987, about one in 400 American teenagers was using an antidepressant. By 2002, the numbers leaped to one in
40.

He feels it's another overused diagnosis, simply because the pills are available.

Instead of immediately resorting to pharmaceutical drugs, he thinks doctors should take more time with the child to find out
why they aren't as cheerful, for instance. At the very least, a few tests should be carried out - and an EEG for certain,
especially since studies have shown that people who have heightened activity in the right frontal lobe respond poorly to
antidepressants.
Kagan remembers going into a textbook-type depression after a major research project he was involved with failed. He had
insomnia and met all the other clinical criteria for depression. But since he knew what the cause was, he didn't seek
professional help. After six months, the depression was gone.

Under normal circumstances, he would have been diagnosed as mentally ill by a psychiatrist and put on
medication.

But here lies an important distinction: when a life event overwhelms us, it's common to fall into a depression for a while. But
there are those who have a genetic vulnerability and experience chronic depression; they are mentally ill.

It's crucial to look not only at the symptoms, but the causes.

This is where psychiatry drops the ball, as it's the only medical profession that establishes illness on symptoms
alone.

Such a blind spot opens the door for new maladies - like bipolar disorder, which we never used to see in children. As it
stands today, nearly a million Americans under the age of 19 are diagnosed with it.

"A group of doctors at Massachusetts General Hospital just started calling kids who had temper tantrums
bipolar. They shouldn't have done that. But the drug companies loved it because drugs against bipolar
disorders are expensive. That's how the trend was started. It's a little like in the 15th century, when people
started thinking someone could be possessed by the devil or hexed by a witch," said Kagan.

When asked if there are alternatives to pharmaceutical drugs for behavioral abnormalities, Kagan said we could look at
tutoring, as an example, for kids diagnosed with ADHD. After all, it's never the ones who are doing well in school that are
diagnosed, it's always the children who are struggling.

Related: ADHD Is A Fabricated Disease, Says Reputed Neurologist

Dangerous Products That Were Unknowingly Using In Our Day-To-Day Life
+ The Cancer Risk To People Who Drink Chlorinated Water Is 93% Higher Than Those
Who Dont
September 30 2016 | From: NewEasternOutlook / EnvirowatchRangitikei / Varous

In todays highly controversial and aggressive world, virtually anything can present a threat to the
life of a human being, not just wars, climate change, or short-sighted and often criminal actions of
certain politicians.

As it has been shown by a number of scientific studies, the activities of a number of American corporations
present a very real threat the well-being of the population mainly due to the use of genetically modified substances
in their products while manufacturing substandard health and beauty aids.

The truth is that its the people of developing countries that are being affected by these fraudulent business practices the
most, since Western corporations try to suppress any information about the health effects of their products to obtain
maximum profit.

At the end of the twentieth century British scientists have come to a sensational conclusion that parabens are capable of
penetrating the skin barrier and are being accumulated in the tissues of the body, causing cancer, hormone system failures,
endocrine system suppression, and skin diseases.
Related: Johnson & Johnson Hid Talcum Powder Link to Ovarian Cancer for 40 Years

Research made this finding while studying malignant tumors in breast tissue, all of which contained parabens, Later
on, these findings were confirmed by Canadian and French scientists.

Parabens are artificial preservatives that are often used in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industry by a number of
Western corporations.

Even though they are effectively increasing the shelf life of a product, while remaining relatively cheap to use, parabens
pose a serious threat to human health and well-being.

From time to time one can come across articles on the harmful effects of parabens in Europe and the United States, forcing
certain companies to replace parabens with less harmful preservatives. However, the markets of developing countries,
especially those with hot and humid climates, are flooded with Western cosmetic products that contain the dangerous
substance.

In order to attract international attention to this danger, the French Le Monde went as far as to publish a list of the 400
Western pharmaceutical products containing parabens and that are, therefore, dangerous for use or consumption.

Related: A New Study Links Benadryl to Serioud Mental Health Diseases Such as Dementia

In this list one may find the baby cream Biafine, such cough medicines as Clarix, Codotussyl, Drill, Hexapneumine, Humex,
Pectosan, and Rhinathiol, stomach relief medicine such as Maalox, Gaviscon, Josacine, and antibiotic Zinnat, along with a
list of other drugs produced by Western corporations and actively advertised for mass consumption.

As it has been pointed out by French journalists, numerous studies have shown that drugs from this list compromise the
functioning of the hormone system, especially the reproductive ability of men and women, and may result in cancer.

At the same time, scientists are stressing the danger of hydro-alcoholic gels which were brought to the market in the wake of
the artificially created hysteria around the danger of the so-called bird flu, the H1N1. These gels are advertised as the
ultimate solution for sanitizing hands and body in the absence of soap.
Related: Hydrogen Peroxide Or Soap And Water To Clean Your Wound? + Why You Should Think Twice Before
Using Antibacterial Soap

A study carried out by the University of Missouri and published in the Plos ONE journal shows that hydro-alcoholic gels
make a person more susceptible to Bisphnol-A.

In 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officially recognized that Bisphnol-A is harmful to human health due
to the negative effect it has on brain functions and the reproductive system. It also causes a number of cancers (in both
women and men) in particular, prostate cancer, breast cancer as well as autism, depression, reproductive and endocrine
systems failure, delays in brain development, diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease.
Yet another study conducted in Argentina showed that 85% of the womens hygienic pads presented a serious
threat to women since they contain the chemically hazardous substance known as glyphosate.

This fact was revealed by researchers of the National Argentine University of La Plata at a recent congress of physicians in
Buenos Aires, upon examining sanitary towels and sanitary pads produced with the use of genetically-modified cotton that
was grown using Roundup herbicide of the American company Monsanto-Bayer.

As we learn from this study,after the use of this herbicide, all cotton products contain this carcinogenic substance. For this
reason, theres been a massive movement in many countries through the collection of signatures to force such producers as
Tampax or Always to state the composition of their products.
Related: Why Are These 25 Carcinogens Still Being Sold?

The Cancer Risk To People Who Drink Chlorinated Water Is 93% Higher Than Those
Who Dont
This information is from well known Dr Mercola. If you go to the link you can download his free
ebook, an excellent resource that will show you how to protect yourself and your loved ones from
health risks by choosing the best water to drink and bathe in.

Need I repeat? We need to be vigilant in what we expose ourselves to today because corporate interests are such
that they will focus on profits not on your health. Be vigilant and be informed.

Related: 'Brockovich' carcinogen found at unsafe levels in tap water supplies of 218mn Americans report

What if that clear, clean-looking liquid you use every day to quench your thirst, to bathe and shower in, and to wash your
dishes and laundry in contributed to dozens of everyday ailments, includingheart attacks, tiredness, sinus problems,
sperm count, risk of miscarriage, a weakened immune system and many more.

Truth is, the water we use in and around our homes is far from the fresh, pure resource you might assume. And the worst
part is

Americans are ingesting from 300 to 600 times what the Environmental Protection Agency considers a safe amount while
chlorine itself is relatively benign, and was created to help keep us free from infectious diarrheas, it reacts with organic
materials which already dissolve in water, forming chemicals (known as DBPs) that are over 100 times more toxic than
chlorine
 According to the U.S. Council of Environmental Quality, the cancer risk to people who drink chlorinated water is
93 percent higher than among those whose water does not contain chlorine.

The residents of a small town in Pennsylvania who ate diets rich in saturated animal fats and milk had no heart
attacks until they switched from mountain spring water to fluoridated water.

Research from the University of Nijmegen in the Netherlands discovered that people who swam in chlorinated
pools or polluted waters as children had 2.2 to 2.4 times the risk of developing melanoma compared to those who
did not swim in chlorinated waters.

Male smokers who drank chlorinated tap water for more than 40 years had double the risk of bladder cancer as
smoking males who drank non-chlorinated water.

Related: Get this FREE report "Is Your Water Safe? How Modern Water Sanitation Can Damage Your Health and
How To Protect Yourself"

12 Proven Natural Therapies To Prevent And Relieve Migraines + Migraines Linked To

Certain Heavy Metals And Mineral Deficiencies
September 30 2016 | From: GreenMedInfo

The World Health Organization in 2007 estimated that migraine headaches are responsible for
more lost years of healthy life in the U.S. than multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, ovarian cancer, and
tuberculosis combined.

Every year nearly one in five westerners experience some form of migraine attack. One in 25 will have headaches
lasting at least 15 days per month.

Related: MSG Proven Highly Toxic: 1 Dose Causes Headache In Healthy Subjects

Migraine is a disorder marked by disabling attacks of severe one-sided, throbbing headaches, and sensitivity to light and
sound. Its often accompanied by nasal congestion, cloudy thinking, or nausea.
What Causes Migraines?

The cause of migraine headaches is still poorly understood. But some things are clear.

Foods are a common trigger of migraines. In a 1979 study in Lancet, 60 migraine patients completed elimination diets.

Results showed the most common foods causing reactions were wheat (78%), oranges (65%), eggs (45%), tea and coffee
(40% each), chocolate and milk (37% each), beef (35%), and corn, cane sugar, and yeast (33% each). When patients
avoided an average of 10 common foods there was a dramatic fall in the number of their headaches per month. And 85% of
patients became headache-free.

Other proven food triggers include cheese, wine, and beer.

Food additives are also a factor. A study published in the Journal of Headache Pain revealed that a single intake
of monosodium glutamate (MSG) produces headache in the majority of healthy subjects tested.

The artificial sweetener aspartame has also been linked to migraines. One reason may be that aspartame breaks down
into formaldehyde in various tissues. Sucrolose, another artificial sweetener sold as Splenda may also be a migraine
trigger.

Exposure to heavy metals is another proven link to migraines. One study from Turkey found that compared to a control
group, migraine sufferers had significantly higher levels of cadmium, iron, lead, and manganese.

Conventional medicine offers few effective or even tolerable therapies for migraines. But a combination strategy
of avoiding migraine triggers while adding natural therapies is proven to help manage migraines.

The Green Med Info database contains 59 articles on natural remedies for migraines. They include a variety of
therapies, vitamins, minerals, and herbs shown to be effective for migraine relief.

Here are just 12 proven therapies to help prevent and relieve migraines:
1. Magnesium

Studies show that migraine sufferers have significantly lower blood levels of magnesium. But you might not know
youre low in magnesium. Most blood tests are not a true reflection of body magnesium stores since most measure less
than 2% of magnesium. The majority of the bodys magnesium (67%) is stored in the bone and 31% is inside cells.

Magnesium is so important that some practitioners believe all migraine patients should be treated with magnesium.

A meta-analysis of 21 studies found intravenous magnesium significantly relieved acute migraine within as little as 15
to 45 minutes. Oral magnesium also significantly alleviated the frequency and intensity of migraine.

And in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial conducted at seven Northern California Kaiser
Permanente sites, children with migraine histories received either magnesium oxide (nine mg per kilogram of their body
weight per day) or placebo. After 16 weeks the magnesium led to lower headache severity and a significant reduction
in headache days.

2. Acupuncture

Acupuncture has been used in China for centuries to treat migraine headache. In a multi-center randomized
controlled study published in the journal Headache, migraine patients were divided into three groups. One group
received real acupuncture treatments and the other two groups received sham acupuncture.

Each patient received one treatment session and was observed over a period of 24 hours. Pain was measured using the
Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
After two hours only the real acupuncture group showed any improvement in pain. After four hours the decrease in the VAS
score for the real acupuncture group was up to 10 times more than the sham groups. Within 24 hours 40.7% of the patients
in the real acupuncture group experienced complete pain relief and 79.6% did not experience recurrence or intensification of
pain.

But its not just better than placebo. Acupuncture beats drugs and other therapies for migraine relief too. In a 2015
Cochrane review of 22 trials with 4,419 participants researchers concluded there is consistent evidence that acupuncture
provides additional benefit to treatment of acute migraine attacks when added to routine care. The researchers noted:

"Studies suggest that acupuncture is at least as effective as, or possibly more effective than, prophylactic drug
treatment, and has fewer adverse effects.

Other studies show that acupuncture is more effective and safer than the drugs metoprolol and flunarizine.
Acupuncture had the added benefit of lowering the use of pain medications and improving patients quality of life.

Studies suggest that acupuncture may work by redistributing energy metabolism in the brain, or decreasing serum
matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) level and activity, or lowering levels of nitric oxide.

3. Chiropractic Treatments

A 2011 meta-analysis of 21 studies found that chiropractic care improves migraine headaches.

In particular, spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) has been shown to relieve migraines. In one randomized control trial
of 127 migraine sufferers, 84 patients received two months (16 treatments) of SMT.
Compared to the control group, the SMT group had significant improvement in migraine frequency, duration, disability, and
medication use.

About 22% of the SMT group reported more than a 90% reduction of migraines. In addition, about 50% more reported
significant improvement in the symptoms of each episode. More than 80% of patients reported stress as a major factor for
their migraines, and researchers suggested that chiropractic care improves conditions related to that stress.

4. Exercise

Exercise can improve migraine symptoms. In one controlled, randomized study in the Clinical Journal of Sports
Medicine a group of migraine sufferers participated in a 6-week, twice weekly, indoor exercise program consisting of 45-
minutes of aerobics and 15 minutes of progressive muscle relaxation.

Compared to the control group, the exercise group reported significantly less migraine pain intensity.
Other forms of exercise proven to improve migraines include qigong and yoga.

5. Mindfulness Therapy

A randomized study in the journal Headache reported that migraine sufferers who participated in an 8-week mindfulness-
based stress reduction program had 1.4 fewer migraines per month than controls. In addition, their headaches were less
severe.

6. Gluten-Free Diet

A German study of 72 celiac patients found that 28% suffered with migraines. Conversely, an Italian study in
the American Journal of Gastroenterology found that a significant proportion of migraine patients have celiac
disease. In the study of 90 migraine sufferers 4.4% were found to have celiacs compared to only 0.4% of a control group.
After a six-month gluten-free diet, one of four celiac patients had no migraine attacks, and the remaining three patients
experienced an improvement in frequency, duration, and intensity of migraine.

7. Coenzyme Q10

A deficiency of CoQ10 may be common in migraine sufferers. Doctors from the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical
Center measured CoQ10 levels in 1,550 pediatric and adolescent patients. Those with low levels started taking 1 to 3 mg/kg
of body weight per day of CoQ10. After a few months patients on CoQ10 reported fewer headaches and less disability.

Another study from Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia found that CoQ10 is an effective preventive treatment
for migraines. Doctors treated 32 migraine patients with 150 mg of CoQ10 per day.
At the end of three months 61.3% of patients had a greater than 50% reduction in the number of days with migraine
headache. Mean migraine frequency also dropped by 55.3% and there were no side-effects.

And a double-blind, randomized Swiss study compared 100 mg of CoQ10 taken three times a day to placebo in 42 migraine
patients. After three months it found CoQ10 was superior to placebo for attack-frequency, headache-days and days-with-
nausea.

Related: The Natural Way to Regenerate Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10)

8. Gingko Biloba

An Italian study of 24 adolescents found that Ginkgolide B, a constituent of ginkgo biloba, was effective as a preventive
treatment in reducing migraine frequency. It also lowered the need for migraine medications.

Another Italian study of 50 women showed that Ginkgolide B reduces migraine frequency and duration.

Patients taking 60 mg of ginkgo biloba twice a day for four months reduced the average number of migraines from 3.7 to
1.2, and reduced length of migraines on average from 40 minutes to 17.6 minutes.

9. Cannabis

A study from the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine found that medical marijuana
decreases migraine frequency. Doctors treated 121 migraine sufferers with various forms of medical marijuana including
inhaled and edible forms. Most subjects used more than one form of marijuana and used it every day.

Headache frequency decreased from 10.4 to 4.6 headaches per month, and 39.7% of patients reported positive effects. In
addition, 19.8% reported fewer headaches and 11.6% reported aborted migraines. Another 11.6% reported negative effects
especially with edible marijuana.
10. B Vitamins

High homocysteine levels have been linked to migraine. In a randomized, double-blind placebo, controlled trial of 52
migraine patients vitamin B cut migraine disability in half. Every day, patients took either a placebo or a combination of 2
mg of folic acid, 25 mg of vitamin B6, and 400 micrograms of vitamin B12.

After six months homocysteine was reduced by 39% in the B vitamin group but was not reduced with placebo. Headache
frequency and pain severity were also reduced, whereas there was no reduction in the placebo group.

Another study published in Neurology found that high-dose riboflavin (vitamin B2) helps prevent migraines.
Researchers compared riboflavin (400 mg per day) and placebo in 55 migraine patients in a randomized trial. After three
months, riboflavin beat the placebo in reducing attack frequency.

In addition, 59% of patients had an improvement of at least 50% in their number of headache days compared to only 15% of
patients taking the placebo.

And a case report from the Mayo Clinic found that one patients migraine attacks responded dramatically to a course of
niacin (vitamin B3).

11. Lavender Oil

Inhalation of lavender essential oil may be an effective treatment for acute migraine headaches. In a study of 47
migraine patients half inhaled lavender essential oil for 15 minutes.
The control group used liquid paraffin for the same time period. Patients recorded their headache severity and symptoms in
30-minute intervals for a total of two hours.

The mean reduction of headache severity on the Visual Analog Scale was 3.6 compared to 1.6 for the control group. Also in
the lavender group 71% of headaches responded entirely or partially to the lavender compared to only 47% in the
placebo group.

12. Butterbur

A German study found butterbur root extract prevents migraines in children and adolescents. Researchers recruited
108 children and adolescents between the ages of 6 and 17 with severe migraines. Patients were treated with 50 to 150 mg
of butterbur root extract depending on their age.

After four months, 77% of all patients reported a reduction in the frequency of migraine attacks of at least 50%. Attack
frequency was reduced by 63%. And 91% of patients felt substantially or at least slightly improved after 4 months of
treatment.
In a study of adults, researchers at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York found that butterbur extract
effectively prevents migraines. Doctors gave 245 migraine patients either a placebo, or 75 mg of the butterbur extract or
50 mg of butterbur extract.

Over 4 months of treatment, migraine attack frequency was reduced by 48% for the 75 mg group, 36% for the 50 mg group,
and 26% for the placebo group. The proportion of patients with a 50% or more reduction in attack frequency after 4 months
was 68% for patients in the 75 mg group and 49% for placebo.

There are many more proven natural migraine therapies. For more information visit Green Med Infos page on
migraine headaches.

Migraines Linked to Certain Heavy Metals and Mineral Deficiencies

For millions of people, migraines can not only be severe, but also mysterious.
When a person tries to connect their migraine with something they might eat or do, they are looking for something
typically called a trigger. This is not necessarily the cause of the migraine, but it might be related to the migraine
especially if it repeats itself prior to every migraine.

Related: These Light Bulbs Cause Anxiety, Migraines, And Even Cancer. If You Have Them, Do THIS Immediately!

Better than a trigger is a metabolic diagnostic indicator. This could be, for example, a fasting blood sugar level, a high
CRP level during a time with repeated migraines or some other diagnostic measurement.

The reason why diagnostic indicators can be more important than triggers is because diagnostic indicators can also allow us
to understand the metabolic cause and a possible solution for the migraine. This contrasts with a trigger, where a potential
solution may only relate to removing that particular trigger, but doesn't get to the root of the problem.

Removing one trigger may lead to continued migraines following other triggers. This can be a never-ending process. This
leaves some people dealing with migraines for decades without a solution.

But discovering a diagnostic indicator will help us determine a larger-scale strategy to remove the migraine.

Testing Migraineurs for Heavy Metals and Minerals

New research from Turkey's Yuzuncu Yil University has utilized a diagnostic indicator to discover the potential link
between heavy metals, minerals and migraines.
The diagnostic tool is quite simple: A blood analysis using atomic absorption spectrophotometry.

The researchers tested 50 people 25 of whom had been diagnosed with migraines. The other 25 people were healthy
control subjects. None of those tested were taking any antioxidant or multivitamin supplements. Also, none smoked, or had
an alcoholic addiction, abused drugs, had liver or kidney disease, a heart condition or inflammatory condition.

Those who suffered from migraines were admitted to the hospital and received a diagnosis and treatment program
consistent with the recommendations of the International Headache Society.

Certain Heavy Metals Linked to Migraines

The researchers found that the migraine patients had significantly higher levels of certain heavy metals compared with the
healthy control group. The heavy metals found in higher levels among the migraine patients were:

Cadmium: The migraine group had an average of .36 micrograms per deciliter (ug/dl) compared to an average of .09 ug/dl
among the healthy controls. That means the migraineurs had on average of four times the cadmium in their blood compared
with the control group.

Iron: The migraineurs had an average of .97 ug/dl of this mineral sometimes considered a heavy metal in their
bloodstream. Meanwhile, the healthy controls averaged less than half that amount, with .48 ug/dl.

Lead: The migraineurs had an average of 1.48 ug/dl of this heavy metal in their bloodstream. The healthy controls had an
average of .70 ug/dl again less than half the levels of the migraineurs.

Manganese: This is considered both a mineral and heavy metal as are all of the above - depending upon the levels found.
This and the others above are normally found in miniscule amounts in healthy persons. The migraine sufferers had an
average of 2.30 ug/dl of manganese. The healthy controls had levels of .62 in their bloodstream. This means the
migraineurs had nearly four times the manganese levels found in the healthy group.
Certain Mineral Deficiencies Also Linked to Migraines

The research also found that the migraine sufferers had notable deficiencies in certain minerals. Here are the heavy hitters:

Copper: The migraine sufferers had an average of 4.63 ug/dl of copper in their blood. Meanwhile, the healthy group had an
average of 8.90 ug/dl of copper. This means the healthy group had nearly double the levels of this important mineral.

Magnesium: The migraineurs had an average of 10.58 ug/dl of this important mineral in their bloodstream. Meanwhile the
healthy controls had an average of 34.51 ug/dl in their blood. This means the healthy controls had about 350% - or three
and a half times the levels of magnesium in their blood compared the migraine sufferers.

Zinc: The migraine sufferers had an average of .24 ug/dl of this important mineral. This contrasted greatly with the healthy
group, which had an average of 5.77 ug/dl of zinc in their bloodstreams. This means the healthy group had over 24 times
the levels of zinc in their blood compared to the migraine sufferers!

The Importance of Mineral Balancing

Mineral balance is critical to health. Many studies have linked numerous conditions with either heavy metal toxicity or a
deficiency in certain minerals. As mentioned above, those elements considered heavy metals are present in most natural
foods and healthy people, but in very small amounts. They are thus to be considered microminerals within the context of our
body.
Other minerals such as calcium, magnesium, zinc and others are considered macrominerals within the body because
our body requires greater amounts of these minerals. These - and even the microminerals are used in the body for
numerous functions.

These include enzyme functions and the production of hormones, neurotransmitters and many others. Some minerals
such as calcium and magnesium are also used by nerve cells to facilitate the transmission of electrical impulses.

Interestingly, when the body is deficient of a particular type of mineral, our metabolism will typically substitute another type
of mineral for that function one with a similar atomic configuration. This substitution often leads to suppressed metabolism
which can result in greater amounts of inflammation and greater fatigue, stress - and now we can say - a greater risk of
migraines.

Other studies have confirmed that many conditions are linked with heavy metal toxicity and mineral deficiencies.

These include dementias, cancers, autistic spectrum disorders, brain disorders and so many others. Research has linked
heavy metals to increased oxidative damage which are linked to these and many other disorders.
This also includes artery diseases, as high cadmium levels have been linked to thickened arteries and atherosclerosis. This
of course can relate directly to migraines, as migraines often relate to poor microcirculation, especially around the brain and
neck region.

With regards to brain disorders in particular, lead has been linked with brain cancer and brain issues because it readily
crosses the blood-brain barrier.

As for therapeutic use of minerals for migraines, both magnesium and zinc have been used for migraines.

For research on how to detoxify heavy metals naturally read the GreenMedInfo.com article on the topic.

Is October Breast Cancer "Awareness" Or "Industry" Month?

September 29 2016 | From: DrMcDougall

October is commonly known as "Breast Cancer Awareness Month." This is an annual, international
campaign organized by major charities to increase the awareness of breast cancer and to raise
funds for research.
"A lot of awareness has been created, but unfortunately there has been no useful progress made in finding the
cause, or for effectively preventing, treating, or curing breast cancer." - HORSESHIT

Related: Mammograms Send Women To Their Deathbeds Faster And Increase Their Risk of Breast Cancer As Much
As 30 Percent

Comment: In 100 years of 'modern medicine' research not ONE cure for ANY DISEASE has ever been allowed to
emerge through the medical establishment - because the upper echelons of the establishment are not interested in
cures or addressing causes - only in addressing symptoms - for profit.

Slowly people are waking up to this, especially with the news of natural cures being so successful, remedies that
the pharmaceutical industry CANNOT PATENT and therefore cannot CONTROL not PROFIT from. And so they
lobby to have real, natural remedies SLANDERED and OUTLAWED.

Related: Eugenics & The Depopulation Agenda

So, put your coins in the buckets but know that you are further funding the medical establishment that will NEVER
RELEASE A CURE FOR CANCER if they have their way.
We do not have a Healthcare System - that label is a farce. We have a Sickness Industry. Driven by the mandates
and objectives of the 'elite' at the top. They have no interest in wellness nor cures.

They wish to keep you as sick as they can for as long as they can whilst extracting as much money from you as
they can in the process. This is not just about money, but consolidation of power and population control, otherwise
known as Eugenics.

Related: The Truth About Cancer

Related: Hospital Fires Leading Cancer Surgeon For Telling The Truth About Medical Establishment

The campaign's efforts have, however, increased the number of women diagnosed with breast cancer, primarily by
encouraging mammograms, and the use of powerful treatments, such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.

The conflicts of interest between businesses sponsoring breast cancer awareness campaigns while at the same time
profiting from breast cancer diagnosis and treatment have resulted in October also being known as "Breast Cancer
Industry Month."

The same year that the Breast Cancer Awareness Month campaign was founded (1985) as a team effort between the
American Cancer Society and a pharmaceutical company (AstraZeneca), I wrote McDougall's Medicine: A Challenging
Second Opinion.

This book includes a comprehensive chapter on the testing and treatment of breast cancer. After reading this scientifically
backed material (click the link over the book cover) you will be shocked to learn that medical doctors and scientists have
known for more than 30 years about the harms that are still being done to women.
Related: Cancer Update: There Are Now 100 Scientific Studies That Prove Cannabis Cures Cancer + Watch What
Happens When Cannabis Is Injected Into Cancer Cells

Countless women have been subjected to life-damaging fear, testing, biopsies, radiation, breast amputations,
drugs, and death, with little, if any, improvement in the quality or quantity of their lives.

The reason this inhumanity continues is that the business of diagnosing and treating breast cancer generates a
great deal of money for medical practices, far more than would be generated through alleviating women's suffering.

Three major articles that made worldwide headlines were published this year (2015) during Breast Cancer Awareness
Month (October), proving that the ineffective ways women have been cared for is widely known. McDougall's Medicine: A
Challenging Second Opinion shows you that this is old news.
Related: 'Cancer Screening Has Never Saved Lives' - BMJ Study Concludes

The first article was published in JAMA Oncology and was a 20-year study of more than 108,000 ductal carcinoma in situ
(DCIS)* patients who had undergone treatment.

The headline-grabbing news was the finding that there was no significant difference in survival among women who had a
mastectomy, a lumpectomy, or a lumpectomy followed by radiation. Surgery and/or radiation do not save lives (not even for
women with invasive cancer).

The second article was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association and was new advice from the
American Cancer Society for when and how often women should have mammograms.
Related: Mammograms Cause Breast Cancer

This organization now recommends that most women should start annual screenings at age 45 rather than at 40, and also
advises switching screening to every other year at 55. This update also recommends no routine physical breast exams to be
performed by doctors, concluding that there is no evidence that these exams save lives.

The third study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine and found the rate of cancers that have spread
beyond the breast when detected has stayed stable since 1975, meaning that mammograms are not preventing the most
deadly (metastatic) forms of breast cancer.

McDougall's Medicine: A Challenging Second Opinion can be ordered as a PDF and found in libraries and secondhand
bookstores. However, you can read this chapter on breast cancer now by clicking on the book cover above.

*DCIS refers to the formal name, ductal carcinoma in situ. This condition is also referred to as stage 0 breast cancer. The
implication is that the abnormal "cancer appearing" cells remain in the milk ducts and show no evidence of spread to other
parts of the body. Because the cells have not spread, DCIS is really not cancer.

Many doctors and scientists are calling for a new name for this condition in an effort to reduce the fear and over-treatment
caused by the word "cancer."

Related Articles:
The 20 Biggest Cancer Lies You've Been Brainwashed To Believe By The For-Profit Cancer Industry + Cancer
Cures Exposed: Natural Medicine Revealed As The Answer

Watch As Amazing GcMAF Treatment Kills Cancer Cells In Real Time

Cancer Industry Now Admits That Chemo And Radiation Treatments Generate Huge Repeat Business & Repeat
Profits

Medical Establishment Doesn't Like Baking Soda Cancer Treatment Because Its Too Effective And Too Cheap

The Man Who Discovered The Cause Of Cancer Wrote A Book On Curing It

5 Cancer Myths Busted

The Cult Of 'Scientism' Explained: How Scientific Claims Behind Cancer, Vaccines, Psychiatric Drugs And GMOs
Are Nothing More Than Corporate-Funded Science Fraud

5 Facts On Cancer That Conventional Medicine Is Now Aggressively Claiming Are Myths + Amish Have Lower
Rates Of Cancer, Ohio State Study Shows

Breast Cancer Cover-Up Continues

Modern Life Is Killing Our Children: UK Cancer Rate In Young People Up 40% In 16
Years + 12 Things A Cancer Doctor Should Never Say
September 25 2016 | From: TheTelegraph / TheTruthAboutCancer / Various

Modern life is killing children with the number of youngsters diagnosed with cancer rising 40 per
cent in the past 16 years because of air pollution, pesticides, poor diets and radiation, scientists
have warned. These two articles include a massive dump on cancer topics both causes and
solutions.
New analysis of government statistics by researchers at the charity Children with Cancer UK found that there are
now 1,300 more cancer cases a year compared with 1998, the first time all data sets were published.

Note: As this first article is from the controlled mainstream it makes ridiculous statements like the causes of cancer
not being known. Interspresed are links to various other articles and resources.

Related: Electromagnetic fields and their negative effects

The rise is most apparent in teenagers and young adults aged between 15 and 24, where the incident rate has risen from
around 10 cases in 100,000 to nearly 16.

Researchers say that although some of the rise can be explained by improvements in cancer diagnoses and more
screening, the majority is probably caused by environmental factors.

Related: CT scans increase your risk of cancer by 35 percent

Dr Denis Henshaw, Professor of Human Radiation Effects at Bristol University, the scientific adviser for Children with
Cancer UK, said air pollution was by far the biggest culprit, accounting for around 40 per cent of the rise, but other elements
of modern lifestyles are also to blame.

Among these are obesity, pesticides and solvents inhaled during pregnancy, circadian rhythm disruption through too much
bright light at night, radiation from x-rays and CT scans, smoking during and after pregnancy, magnetic fields from power
lines, gadgets in homes, and potentially, radiation from mobile phones.

Related: Vaccine ingredients cause tumors to grow

Children are surrounded by electrical fields, warn scientists

"When you look at cancers such as childhood leukaemia there is no doubt that environmental factors are playing a
big role, said Dr Henshaw. We were shocked to see the figures, and its modern lifestyle Im afraid."

Many items on the list of environmental causes are now known to be carcinogenic, such as air pollution and
pesticides and solvents. There has been good research to suggest a mother's diet can damage DNA in cord blood.
Light at night we know is very disruptive for the body, which is why shift workers have such bad health.

Burnt barbecues, the electric fields of power lines, the electricity supply in your home. Hairdryers. Its all of these
things coming together, and it seems to be teenagers and young people that are most affected.

Whats worrying is it is very hard to avoid a lot of these things. How can you avoid air pollution? It sometimes feels
like we are fighting a losing battle.

More than 4,000 children and young people are diagnosed with cancer every year in Britain, and cancer is the leading cause
of death in children aged one to 14.

Related: Brain cancer replaces leukemia as deadliest cancer for kids, study shows

Diagnoses of colon cancer among children and young people has risen 200 per cent since 1998, while thyroid cancer has
doubled. Ovarian and cervical cancers have also risen by 70 per cent and 50 per cent respectively.

The charity estimates that the rise in cases now costs the NHS an extra 130 million a year compared with 16 years ago.
Related: Gwyneth Paltrow warns of the dangers of cell phone use and WiFi radiation

But experts believe many cancers could be prevented with lifestyle changes such as allowing children to attend nursery to
boost their immune system, not painting childrens rooms with oil-based paints, avoiding night shift work and processed
meats in pregnancy.

The figures were released ahead of the Children with Cancer UK conference which is taking place in London this week.

Other cancer experts said they had also noticed a rise in cancer diagnoses but warned it was too early to draw firm
conclusions on the causes.

Nicola Smith, Cancer Research UKs senior health information officer, said: [Bollocks mainly]

Any rise in childhood cancers is worrying but its important to remember that less than one per cent of cancer
cases in the UK occur in children.

Its not yet clear exactly what causes cancer in childhood and research has not shown a link with environmental
factors like air pollution and diet during pregnancy.

There are some factors which can increase the risk of childhood cancer like inherited genetic conditions and
exposure to radiation but these are usually not avoidable and no one should feel blamed for a child getting
cancer.

Evidence has shown that there are lots of things adults can do to reduce cancer risk and its always a good idea to
set up healthy habits as a family, like eating healthily, being active and enjoying the sun safely.

Related: Massive government study concludes cell phone radiation causes brain cancer

Kate Lee, chief executive of childrens cancer charity CLIC Sargent, said that a child cancer diagnosis places a huge
emotional and financial burden on the whole family.
 "Over the last year CLIC Sargent provided support for more than 7,100 families, more than ever before, but we
know that we can still only reach two out of three of those children and young people diagnosed with cancer, she
added.

As more young cancer patients are diagnosed every year, we know each of those families will need support and
are working hard to one day be able to provide those services for every young patient.

Despite the increase, around 80 per cent of child cancer patients now survive for at least five years. But the aggressive
treatments they have as children can have a major impact on their future health, even if they survive.

Related: Apple's new 'wireless' headphones emit radiation ... right next to your brain

Tomorrow, Children with Cancer UK launches a five-point plan calling on the Government and the science and medical
community to ensure that all children diagnosed with cancer in the UK have access to precision medicine by 2020.

Related Articles:

The politics behind the science of cell phone safety

Teen who was allergic to WiFi commits suicide: mom

Cellphone Radiation Linked to Cancer in Major Rat Study

Latest iPhones Have Almost SIX TIMES More Cancer-Causing Radiation Than Competing Brands

Telecom Companys Patent Admits: Non-Thermal Exposures To Wireless Radiation Is Genotoxic, Causes Clear
Damage to Hereditary Material

What the Hell is this? Microwave Bursts in most Major US Population Centers Showing up on Weather Radar!

Cancer Curing Doctor Found Shot Dead shortly after Govt. Raid on Clinic

Interview with the late Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez: Chemo drugs are derived from World War I nerve gas chemicals
 The cancer risk to people who drink chlorinated water is 93 percent higher than those who dont

8 Lifestyle Hacks that Ward off Cancer

The Quiet Killer ~ Exploding Autoimmune Epidemics ~ Vaccines & Man Made Cancer ~ Dr. Randy Tent

Why I Said No to Chemo

Wi-Fi: The Invisible Killing Fields

Why wireless radiation is dangerous and why the safety guidelines urgently need updating

Cell Phone Technology Disrupts Brain Activity

12 Things A Cancer Doctor Should Never Say

We can all agree that proper communication skills are essential for the best cancer care. While
some patients appreciate a direct approach, others need a bit of hand-holding. Some cancer
doctors have good bedside manners, displaying genuine empathy for their patients. Others can
be considered bullies in white coats. But it all comes down to this what a cancer doctor says or
doesnt say can make all the difference in your outcome.

Doctors frequently take an overly dominant role. Proactive patients are often treated with sarcasm or arrogance.
The patient who comes armed with research might be told I see you have spent some time on Google. I think it is
best if you let me diagnose you and tell you the treatment that is most suitable for you.

Related: Researchers Finally Confirm that Cancer is a Purely Man-Made Disease

Cancer treatment requires a partnership between doctor and patient. A patient needs to be comfortable and confident
that the chosen treatment is the best option for them.
As a cancer strategist I hear of all kinds of terrible comments made by oncologists to their patients. Even those patients who
intend to comply with the recommendations of their oncologist hear words that should never be spoken. Often times I am
sure that these comments are not meant to be callous, but are just spoken in ignorance.

Here are 12 things you should never hear from your cancer doctor. Be on the lookout for doctors who say any of
these. It could be a sign that they need an attitude adjustment and that you need a new doctor:

#1. Im afraid I have bad news. If you didnt already suspect you had a problem to deal with, you would not be sitting in
the doctors office. This statement brings on fear. Doctors do this so that you will comply with their orders. Skip the drama
doc.

Related: A DIRE WARNING: The Cancer Industry Owns The Media And Your Mind

#2. You have three months to live. It is rarely helpful to have a doctor pretend he has a crystal ball. While from
experience they might have an idea how long the average patient lives given a particular diagnosis, we are all individuals
and YOU ARE NOT AVERAGE. Despite what the doctor says, there is always hope. There is always a way to extend life or
even reverse the dis-ease.

Just like bad news, a prognosis brings on fear and the need to comply albeit in a different way. Studies show that people
are told they have three months to live dutifully fulfill that directive from their doctor. Even worse, a poor prognosis takes
away the will to live and ability to think outside the box and to change the direction of the dis-ease.

There are innumerable remissions of advanced and late stage cancers. There are countless stories of patients who were
offered little chance of survival or a cure, yet who are here years later to tell their tale. A quick perusal through the articles on
The Truth About Cancer website will bring you valuable information on surviving the odds.

Related: Breakthrough Discovery Shows That Resonant Frequencies Can Kill Cancer Cells

Hope gives us the opportunity to do what we must do to heal from cancer. Even in the face of the most advanced of
cancers, there is usually room for some words of encouragement and support. This can make all the difference in the
patients attitude towards their disease and their treatment. While there is hope, there is life.

#3. If you dont do X you will die. For some bizarre reason, cancer doctors think they know everything. Yes, I know
that they went to medical school, but there was competent and effective medicine well before Big Pharma taught these
doctors. Know that there are many, many options when it comes to managing cancer dont let your doctor bully you. In
fact, you might point out to your doctor that you are more likely to die if you follow one of the standard protocols instead of
opting for a less toxic treatment plan.
Related: Landmark Study Shows Half of Cancer Patients are Killed by Chemo - NOT Cancer

#4. You have no choice. Sorry, doctor, yes, you do. They might also say you have no other options. While it is always a
good idea to get a second, third, or even fourth opinion, be sure to get at least one from an alternative or holistic doctor.

The award-wnning documentary The Idiot Cycle (2009) about the companies involved in producing toxic chemicals, cancer treatments and
genetically modified crops

Otherwise, you are still limiting your options and overlooking key lifelines to survival.

#5. Calm Down. Given the situation at hand, it is understandable that a patient might be upset. Telling a patient they need
to calm down or speaking to him or her in a dominant tone of voice clearly shows a lack of empathy and offers no chance of
a partnership.

#6. This treatment will not harm you. Be sure you are clear on what harm means to your cancer
doctor. Chemotherapy, radiation, hormone therapies, and even surgery harm the body and increase your risk of more
cancer. Be aware of the life-threatening and quality of life-threatening side effects, and do not believe that they are always
worth it. Studies and case studies have not provided evidence of efficacy.

Related: The TRUTH about CHEMO

#7. Here are the statistics. You are a person, not a statistic. You have your own unique set of circumstances; your own
history. Statistics are helpful for doctors who use a checklist to make treatment recommendations. As an empowered person
who is committed to make lifestyle changes that can affect your health and outcome, statistics do not apply.

Further, statistics are typically skewed in favor of treatment recommendations. For example, a patient might hear that by
taking hormone therapy they will reduce their risk of recurrence by almost 50%. Sounds great, right? However in actuality, it
may be the case that the risk without the therapy was only 2% and with the drugs 1%. That 50% reduction doesnt really
mean much, does it?
Related: American Cancer Society admits conventional cancer treatment causes more cancer

Or in the case of chemotherapy, a patient might hear that the therapy will decrease risk by 30%. But if the risk of dying was
only 10% to begin with, the survival benefit on an absolute basis is only 3%. Considering the downsides of these therapies,
one must extrapolate the true benefit and compare this to the possible harm they deliver.

#8. This treatment will cure you. This is a bold statement for sure. If your doctor is not addressing the cause of your
cancer, the treatment is not a cure. Cancer is complicated, but most often the root cause can be determined and
resolved. Only then can any treatment be considered curative.

I have never met anyone who was Tamoxifen- or chemotherapy-deficient, for example, so there is no reason to believe that
taking either will resolve the reason for your cancer.

#9. You are wasting your time with nutritional supplements. While there is no one magic bullet, no one cure for
cancer, lifestyle factors such as taking supplements can make a difference. There is too much evidence on how nutritional
factors influence genetic expression for anyone to ignore the power of food and supplements.

Related: HOW and WHY Cannabis Cures Cancer Scientific Explanation

What we eat makes a powerful difference. A mostly plant based, whole foods diet and taking nutritional supplements can
have a substantial impact. That said, in these days of nutrient-depleted soil conditions and over-farming, food just does not
have the nutrient content of years past. Plus, busy lives do not always allow for perfect meals. Hence, supplements are a
necessary part of an anticancer protocol.

#10. Cancer Just Happens: Its a Matter of bad luck. This is so ridiculous I just had to include it. Cancer develops for a
reason. It is a signal, a cry for help that tells us something or many things are not right within the body. Overexposure to
toxins, the genetic inability to manage toxins, and the entire issue of unresolved emotional traumas are some of the biggest
triggers of cancer.
Although nutritional deficiencies are not likely the cause of ones cancer, they do allow it to develop and grow.

Related: The Shocking REAL Cause of Cancer Deaths!

Dont accept that blanket statement from your doctor. Whether they are saying this out of ignorance or for your emotional
protection, it is not helpful when it comes to your healing and survival.

#11. Alternative doctors are quacks. What mainstream cancer doctors consider to be alternative was once medicine.
Sadly, modern medicine focuses on drug therapies and fails to acknowledge the reasons that cancer has become rampant.
We are not sick because we have cancer we have cancer because we are sick. If we do not correct what created the dis-
ease, we cannot cure it. Alternative doctors consider the whole person. They believe that making a person well is just as
important or even more important than targeting the symptoms of cancer (such as a tumor).

Related: The Suppression of a Natural Cancer Cure

While every alternative treatment works for someone, not every treatment works for everyone. Part of this is, again, because
we all have our own unique circumstances for having cancer. Be sure you work with a qualified practitioner and coach to
optimize the healing of your body and your cancer.

And last but not least

#12. Estrogen causes breast cancer. This is simply not accurate. Estrogen has 400 essential functions in a womans
body. While estrogen dominance and hormonal imbalance can allow breast cancer to develop and grow, estrogen does not
cause breast cancer. More precisely, estrogen can turn on cancer genes, but only if not opposed by progesterone. So
blaming estrogen for cancer is a bit like saying that matches cause fires. You have to light the match, right?

Related: Breast Cancer Cover-Up Continues

Progesterone acts as an antagonist to estrogen. While estrogen is associated with breast and other cancers, progesterone
has anti-cancer effects.

When the opposing force of progesterone is increased, the toxic effect of estrogen is decreased. So while estrogen can turn
on cancer genes, progesterone turns on genes that can prevent breast cancer from occurring. Instead of blocking or
eliminating estrogen, you may want to concentrate on increasing progesterone so the fire is not ignited by the match.

A note on receptors: when activated by progesterone, the progesterone receptors attach themselves to the estrogen
receptors. Once this happens, the estrogen receptors stop turning on genes that promote the growth of the cancer cells.
Instead, they turn on genes that promote the death of cancer cells (known as apoptosis) and the growth of healthy, normal
cells.

Hormone receptors are dependent on iodine, which increases the sensitivity of the receptor to the hormone it was designed.
So rather than block your receptors, it would be prudent to ensure you have sufficient iodine in your diet so that the
receptors can work most efficiently.

Related Articles:

Scientist Demonstrates How Cancer Can Be Destroyed By Frequencies

John Grisham is Giving His Book Away for Free to Educate People on an Alternative Cure for Cancer

Cannabis oil cures terminal cancer in 3-year-old after pharmaceutical drugs fail miserably

10 Natural Cancer Treatments Revealed

Olive Oil Compound Kills Cancer Cells in 30 Minutes

Marijuana Kills Cancer Cells, Admits the U.S. National Cancer Institute

TRULY HEAL CANCER with GcMAF WHY THEY BAN RAW MILK
Bayer's Monsanto Deal To Be Closely Watched By New Zealand Farmers As Agri-
Chemical Players Dwindle
September 22 2016 | From: NationalBusinessReview

Bayer's US$66 billion acquisition of Monsanto, creating the world's biggest supplier of seeds and
agri-chemicals to farmers, will be closely watched by New Zealand's rural sector as the latest in a
series of deals that has shrunk the number of competitors in the market.

Bayer and Monsanto are two of the big seven companies selling agricultural chemicals in New Zealand.

Related: Monsanto to be acquired by Bayer, the Nazi-era IG Farben 'crimes against humanity' poison chemical
company

Of the other five, Dow Chemical is in the process of a global merger with DuPont and Swiss seed giant Syngenta is close to
being acquired by China National Chemical Corp, which already owns Adama.

Of the others, ASX-listed Nufarm had a distribution agreement with Monsanto for its Roundup glyphosphate products up
until 2013, while Bayer rival BASF reportedly held inconclusive talks with Monsanto earlier this year

Bayer chief executive Werner Baumann has indicated the companies would need to file for clearance in about 30
jurisdictions for the deal and get antitrust approval in the US, Canada, Brazil and the EU, the Financial Times reports. The
deal has stoked concern among US farmer groups that they may face price increases for agricultural products.

Federated Farmers arable farming chair Guy Wigley called it:

"A significant development for New Zealand farming. It's a very finely tuned marketplace and farmers are highly
sensitive to pricing," he said. "The costs and benefits of using all their products are keenly understood."
Wigley likened agri-chemicals to the pharmaceuticals industry, where there was plenty of competition for older products that
had come off patent while companies sought a premium to cover research and development costs for new products.

The Commerce Commission said it is unable to comment on whether the transaction would require its scrutiny. However,
John Hampton, professor of seed technology and director of the Lincoln University Seed Research Centre, said it may
require antitrust approval.

While Monsanto is the world's largest seed company, its GM crops such as Roundup-ready Canola, soybean and maize
aren't sold in New Zealand and its local sales in that market are confined to vegetable seeds produced by its Seminis and
De Ruiter units.

Related: The Complete History Of Monsanto, The Worlds Most Evil Corporation

Bayer has a smaller seeds business but is mainly in the pest and disease product side of the agri-chemical market, including
seed treatments, while Monsanto's chemicals were more in the herbicide and weed control side of the market.

All up there were about half a dozen major companies in the seed sector, "so I can't see there would be a major impact in
what's happening in seeds in New Zealand," Hampton said, adding that he speculated that Monsanto's GM technology was
a major driver for Bayer's takeover offer.

Globally, there was no new herbicide chemistry emerging and increased resistance and regulatory hurdles for some existing
ones. At the same time growing demand "for more sustainable methods of weed and pest control," he said.

Chemicals aren't the future. Now the industry is looking at interactions between microbes and plants -
biocontrols," he said.
The past five years have been marked by a number of acquisitions of small biocontrol companies by big agri-chemical
producers "being astute and looking to the future". Research was now focussed in two main areas - GM technology and the
use of bacteria and fungi to control pests and diseases and to promote plant growth, he said.

Industry group Agcarm, which represents about 85 percent of the New Zealand agri-chemicals market, has 14 members
listed as crop protection companies. It estimates the New Zealand market is worth $250 million to $300 million.

Bayer's offer for Monsanto of US$128 a share in cash is about 20 percent more than the last trading price of US$106.76.
Bayer said the deal would create "significant value" with annual synergies of about US$1.5 billion after three years "plus
additional synergies from integrated solutions in future years".

Related: Monsanto and Bayer: Why Food And Agriculture Just Took A Turn For The Worse

What Do Smart Meters And Vaccinations Have In Common? + Another Vaccine Dump
September 20 2016 | From: NaturalBlaze / Various

Jerry Day of Freedom Taker.com has produced an exceptional new video wherein he explains in
detail what Smart Meters and Vaccinations have in common.
Its called Conditional Acceptance, a term and a legal tactic whereby you can refuse anyone who pressures you
to sign either an opt-out agreement for a Smart Meter or demands you to accept a vaccination.

Related: Del Bigtree: Our Children Are Being Sold To The Pharmaceutical Industry

Opt-out contracts are ones big corporations give you when you refuse corporate offers. Jerry explains what he calls
highway robbery in this video.

Listen carefully to what Jerry explains, plus take notes, because his logic may be one that you can utilize under Right of
Contract. Jerry says;

Always remember that you have Right of Contract. That is the legal term used to describe the fact that on any
contract or agreement your signature must be fully voluntary and not coerced in any way. If youre pressured into
signing or agreeing, your signature and agreement technically have no authority or effect."

And legally, there is no contract or agreement if you can show there was coercion or pressure causing you
to sign that contract. So your Right of Contract means that you and only you may decide whether you
sign something or not. And you may not be penalized in any way for refusing to sign anything.

They [utilities and governments] are criminally violating utility customers and they know it. So when they
refuse to insure the damage, their equipment will cause to you, you have every right to refuse that equipment.

If the equipment they are installing was really not harmful and did not violate your rights, the insurance would cost
almost nothing. But electronic utility meters are known to be hazardous and harmful so much so that no
insurance company will provide insurance for any price [more about insurance here], because they know
that advanced utility metering is a ticking time bomb of damages and litigation. Vaccinations represent a
very similar situation to utility metering.

Listen intently to what Jerry says about Conditional Acceptance because thats the bargaining chip in the song and dance
you will have to engage in to protect yourself and your family from AMI Smart Meter RFs/EMFs, dirty electricity they produce
, plus possible fire loss to your home from Smart Meters proclivity to malfunction.
The same logic regarding Right of Contract and Conditional Acceptance applies with regard to vaccinations. Jerry delves
into vaccinations like you may not have heard before.

Homeowners insurance and health insurance do not cover you for losses from AMI Smart Meters or injured health from
receiving a vaccine! The unfair fact about bullying and harassment from utilities and the medical profession has to be
understood fully for what it is: You are liable for all damages unless you are prepared not to be left helpless and demand
your legal rights by taking Jerrys advice into consideration.

After listening to the above video, please be certain to check out thedownloadable documents A-2 and A-4 regarding Smart
Meters. Theres also a Vaccination Notice Jerry talks about. All are offered as templates at www.FreedomTaker.com.

Related Articles

Yes, they just keep coming - the evidence is in the order of a flood of biblical proportions for this with the eyes to see:

Shocking research confirms vaccines are contaminated with Monsanto's RoundUp herbicide

Anthony Samsel on Vaccines contaminated with Glyphosate

Vaccines: Prevention or Curse?

Vaccination: Serious Concerns

Another Vaccine Bombshell Glyphosate Think Monsantos Roundup Confirmed in Most Vaccines

Intelligent Parents are Refusing Vaccinations

The Average Flu Shot Left This 9-Year-Old Girl Paralyzed And Non-Verbal

Flu deaths continue to mount in people vaccinated against it

Vaccine Quackery Bombshell: Key studies cited to 'prove' vaccines are safe were funded almost entirely by
vaccine manufacturers

New vaccines will permanently alter human DNA

New Vaccine Whistleblower Film Premieres To Standing Ovation

How Big Pharma Targets Your Kids!

Actor Rob Schneider Speaks Out Against the Dangers of Vaccines

Shock Report: Testing Reveals Glyphosate Present in Childhood Vaccines

Shocking Research Confirms Vaccines Are Contaminated With Monsanto's RoundUp

Herbicide

Folks, I have written about the problems with vaccines in previous blog posts. Now, a new serious
contamination problem with our vaccines has been identified.
Researcher Anthony Samsel has published five peer-reviewed articles on the herbicide Glyphosate (the active
ingredient in Roundup). A yet-to-be published sixth paper found various commonly-used vaccines contaminated
with the herbicide glyphosate.

Yes, you read that correctly: Our vaccines are contaminated with an herbicide that the World Health Organization
characterized as"probably carcinogenic to humans."

How can this happen? That answer is easy.

Many vaccines contain animal byproducts such as gelatin, bovine casein, bovine serum, bovine calf serum, or chicken egg
protein. The animals from which these products come from are fed grains sprayed with glyphosate. It does not take a rocket
scientist to come to the conclusion that these animals, fed glyphosate in their diet, would contain glyphosate in their
byproducts.

Samsel sent a letter to Congress that stated:

I have run numerous groups of vaccines and identified several vectors of contamination. These include the
excipient gelatins, egg protein and or similar substrates used to grow vaccines.

I have found gelatins and egg proteins contaminated with Glyphosate-based herbicides from animals fed a
glyphosate contaminated diet.

This contamination carries into thousands of consumer products i.e. vitamins, protein powders, wine, beer and
other consumables which use gelatins as part of the product or in fining and processing."

What did Samsel hear back?

He heard nothing.

In other words, our do-nothing Congress, so far, has failed to respond. In his letter to Congress, Samsel also stated that
Glyphosate is a synthetic amino acid. It bioaccumulates and is found in all tissue types, particularly the bone and marrow of
animals fed a diet contaminated with Glyphosate residues.

You can see Dr. Samsel talk about his research by clicking here.
The following vaccines were found to be contaminated with the herbicide glyphosate:

1. MMR

2. Varicella (chicken pox)

3. Zostavax (shingles)

4. Proquad (MMR, rubella, varicella)

5. Fluzone Quad (flu vaccine)

6. Hepatitis B (B Energix-B)

Multiple vaccines from different manufactures were found to be contaminated. Folks, this is a big deal. Injecting a
vaccine contaminated with a known herbicide that is "probably carcinogenic to humans" should be prohibited. We need a
Congressional investigation into our vaccines.

We keep hearing the mantra that vaccines are safe. Injecting a vaccine containing an herbicide is safe? Give me a break!
It is time to call your political representatives and tell them to investigate this matter. I can assure you that it is not safe to
inject a known neurotoxin such as mercury or aluminum. Nor is it safe to inject a known carcinogen such as formaldehyde.

Guess what? It is not safe to inject an herbicide that is a probable human carcinogen.

Follow Dr. Brownstein's blog for more great articles by clicking here.

Anthony Samsel on Vaccines contaminated with Glyphosate

Scientists Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff have just gotten the fifth peer reviewed paper on Glyphosate published. Its
named "Glyphosate pathways to modern diseases V: Amino acid analogue of glycine in diverse proteins".

In this regard Tony Mitra interviewed Anthony Samsel, to cover the newly emerging scientific findings on Glyphosate and
how it can and does hurt creatures including humans.

In the course of the interview, Anthony Samsel mentioned the issues being covered in their next paper, the 6th one. This
covers a number of vaccines that use animal byproducts such as egg protein and gelatine. He suspected these products
might be contaminated with Glyphosate, if the vaccine makers were using factory farmed animals fed with Glyphosate laced
GMO feed.

To verify, he got a large number of vaccines that do use egg proteins and gelatine and got them analyzed in multiple labs.
The results confirmed his doubt. The vaccines themselves are largely contaminated with Glyphosate and pose serious
hazard to those that are and will be vaccinated using these products.

Not So Smart Technology: Safety Inspector Blows The Whistle On Fire Hazards Of
'Smart' Electronics
September 20 2016 | From: Sott /

If you think your "smart" appliances are the "cat's whiskers," then please think again! Actually, in
my opinion, they are the dumbest things ever invented that have been able to buffalo consumers
into spending their hard-earned money to purchase, but have the greatest potential for causing
consumers harm and grief.
Recently, I received an email from one of my readers who had to attend a fire safety training session for 'their' job.
That instructional course was given by none other than a Delaware County, Pennsylvania Fire Investigator, who
was quite explicit in his presentation about certain fire causes.

Related: Smart Meters Not Needed After All For European Power Grid + How To Opt Out From Smart Meters

Here's what the email said for which this sender gave permission to share:

He [the trainer] mentioned in the beginning of his presentation how fire deaths were down, but house fires were
up dramatically across the nation. [CJF emphasis added]

Later during the Q&A, I asked him in front of the whole group [what were] the causes of these fires. He
mentioned all the electronics - WiFi/Bluetooth gadgets, cheap phone chargers, iPads, wide screen TVs, etc.

I interrupted to say "how about smart meters" to which he replied: Anything "smart" is a fire hazard.

This [smart] technology is so new, and they haven't tested or developed it adequately enough yet.

He went on to poke fun at "smart" wired houses having everything linked and what a hazard that can cause.

Then after the presentation, I commented how I heard that as this technology ages, it becomes even more
potentially hazardous, which he affirmed, and also mentioned that

More car fires occur because of all the electronic gadgetry now.

All the above information is yet another confirmation with implications for Consumer Protection Law(s) at local and state
levels regarding "smart" consumer appliances and fires, which insurance companies - especially AMI Smart Meter fires -
are declining coverage for!

But there is even more serious damage happening every minute of the day from microwave technology, which smart
appliances operate on. It's called electromagnetic frequencies (EMFs/RFs) that emit non-ionizing radiation which cause
adverse health effects known as "non-thermal" effects.

Comment: Dr. Barrie Trower, a British physicist has acquired a great deal of expertise in the microwave field, extending his
research to common electronic systems, including cell phones, iPods, computer games and microwave ovens. His research
has shown that microwave radiation is extremely hazardous, especially to pregnant women and young children.

The risks are so great that the use of WiFi can lead to permanent genetic damage to our children and subsequent
generations.

WiFi to kill millions, with its effects being cumulative over generations

Neurosurgeon Shows How Low Levels of Radiation Such As Wi-Fi, Smart Meters And Cell Phones Cause The
Blood Brain Barrier To Leak

The BioInitiative Report - The Dangerous Health Impacts of Microwave Radiation

EMF pollution: The health impacts of wireless RF radiation

Consumers, when they really learn the downside of "smart technology," obviously will have to beef up their activism to get
the protection they need for their health and properties, as the industries involved - and more sadly - states public utility
commissions - really don't give a hoot about the harms caused, otherwise they would be enacting legislation to deal with
them.

And then there's this information that I received from readers whose privacy I respect and honor, but will share their
information. In sharing information like the following from a reader in Canada, it is that consumers become aware, physically
safer plus empowered:

People need to be getting documentation about all of these fires. Media articles are often the starting point, but
 they are anecdotal. Once there is what sounds like a smart meter fire, request and obtain the official fire report
from the state or provincial fire commissioner.

Find out what the legal reporting and investigating requirements are. If the fire is believed to be electrical, who
does the investigation and how is he informed about the fire? Are the laws being followed?

Are meters being removed? It takes time and digging but I can't find anyone else who is getting this sort of info for
fires in their areas. It is only when this documentation is obtained for many fires and patterns are found that
things will be taken seriously.

In the US the Consumer Affairs Dept. [1] has agreed to gather reports on smeter fires. I have sent her a few
because the ITRON meters we use are the same used in many places in the US. But in Canada our meters are
not considered "consumer" goods since the utilities own them.

This agency should be informed but it requires full documentation - not just media reports."

Note that here's what I think our kind and thoughtful Canadian neighbor is referring to:

The US Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) is a federal agency that will take complaints on utility
smart meters from all US states. If you have or had smart meter electrical or fire problems CALL: (800) 638-
2772 Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. ET or submit your complaint by email. "

However, I must caution a consumer that, if or when you experience an AMI Smart Meter ('smeter') fire, immediately after
the fire has been extinguished and it is safe to do so, take photographs with your cell phone and a regular camera, so you
can have "secured" documentation because things can get 'lost' in cyberspace! Remember to attach copies of those photos
with the smeter fire report you file with the US Consumer Products Safety Commission.

Additionally, I must share that I've heard stories that the power company immediately removes the fire-damaged meter
and does not allow consumers access to it or to keep a fire-damaged meter as 'proof' for insurance purposes. It
seems that 'games' are being played, and insurance companies 'buy' into them too!

Fire safety regarding all 'smart' technology should be enforced by consumer products safety commissions, municipalities
and code enforcement departments at local and state levels. Obviously they are not doing that when it comes to AMI Smart
Meters made with heat-sensitive plastic parts. Analog meters were made of glass and steel parts.

Learn how to protect yourself from smart technology EMFs/RFs and fire hazards.
Related Articles:

Radiation emitted from smart meters 100 times greater than cell phones - and exposure is constant, doctors warn

AMI Smart Meter Testing Video Disputes Safety Claims for Smart Meter EMFs

ZigBee Radio Transmitter: How Many Do You Have?

All This Heart Stuff Including: Is Heart Disease From A Sulfur Deficiency?
September 19 2016 | From: GreenMedInfo

We normally don't think much about it, but sulfur is a hugely important nutrient for the body, and
when we lack this critical substance, we may be paying for it with the health of our hearts.

Sulfur is a non-metallic element (number 16) that is a critical nutrient for the body. Unfortunately, so many people
don't consume enough. Over the years, it has been forgotten by the FDA and not added to grains/rice as part of the
"fortification" process.

Related: Most cardiologists shocked to discover the true cause of heart attacks

Sadly, most diets are deficient in sulfur rich foods like grass fed beef, garlic, onion, and quality eggs. Farmers are not
putting sulfur in the soil or feed, therefore plant and animal sulfur content is diminished. The quality of veggies depends on
the soil in which they grow. Animals eat those plants. Sulfur is also found naturally in spring water. If you use reverse
osmosis, the sulfur is removed.

Sulfur is one of the top 10 most abundant nutrients in the body. There is about the same amount of sulfur as potassium,
and there is more sulfur than sodium.
It is an essential element for human life and combines with so many other nutrients including amino acids (building blocks
for proteins), metals (sulfur clears them out of the body), vitamins, and even makes our skin, hair, and nails strong. You can
thank sulfur for the smell of garlic or the whiff of a skunk. Rotting eggs, same thing.

One of the most important places to find sulfur in the human body is in the glutathione molecule. It is formed from the amino
acids cysteine, glutamine, and glycine.

Glutathione serves many functions including:

Anti-oxidant that clears out free-radicals

Anti-inflammatory

Detoxifier that binds toxins and metals, making them water soluble, and easy to excrete from the body.

The Endothelial Glycocalyx

Wow, that is a mouthful. But hang in there. As noted in the picture above, lining all major blood vessels is a layer of cells
called the endothelium. These cells control what comes into the artery wall and what stays in the inside area of blood flow
called the lumen. Interestingly, there is a space that serves as a buffer between blood flow and the endothelium.

This area is called the glycocalyx and researchers are only scratching the surface at its importance. One nutrient that is
found extensively in the glycocalyx is sulfur. Given most diets are deficient in sulfur, could this be a major factor
in atherosclerosis?

Sulfur and Amino Acids

Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins. Some of these amino acids such as cysteine, methionine, and cystine
contain sulfur. Cysteine is an important amino acid for the building of glutathione mentioned above. Methionine cannot be
manufactured by the body and is considered an essential amino acid. Cysteine and cystine can be made, but an adequate
supply of sulfur is needed.
Homocysteine and taurine are similar to amino acids, contain sulfur, and are very important molecules in human
biochemistry.When homocysteine gets out of control, bad things happen including heart attacks, strokes, cancer and
dementia. On the flip side, low homocysteine is also a problem. We are looking for levels between 5 and 7. Taurine is a
component of bile salt for digestion and is known to reduce blood pressure and prevent heart rhythm issues.

Alpha-lipoic acid contains a sulfur molecule and also does some amazing things in the body such as lowering oxidative
stress, lowers blood sugar by improving insulin function, chelation, and lowers blood pressure by improving endothelial
function.

Sulfur in Food

Sulfur is found in many foods such a Brussels Sprouts, broccoli, cabbage, and onion. But my favorite sources are seafood,
eggs, and of course, garlic. Just to be clear, eggs do not cause heart disease as reviewed in a recent article. In fact, eggs
raise HDL and improve HDL function (6) and improve blood sugar. Don't fear the egg and don't fear the smell of garlic. That
smell is health.

Benefits of garlic include (8,9):

Reduces plaque formation

Lowers blood pressure and lowers blood sugar

Decreases LDL number, oxidized LDL, and lowers triglycerides

Natural blood thinner that inhibits platelet aggregation and increases fibrinolytic activity

Anti-cancer. Lowers prostate cancer risk by 23%. Lowers lung cancer risk by 44%.
 Anti-microbial

Natural chelator

Raw milk is an excellent source of sulfur when it comes from grass-fed, pasture-raised animals. When protein in dairy is an
amazing source of cysteine. Pasteurization may negate some of the benefit of whey (10). Eat and drink dairy in the raw.

Sulfur in Water

Most spring water contains naturally occurring sulfur. But no brand compares with Pellegrino. Sure, you can add sulfur to
water, but Pellegrino is an excellent choice and my favorite beverage. You can add some citrus juice or herbal tea to create
a refreshing drink, especially in the summer.

Sulfur in Supplements

Credit Dr. George Mann MD in 1960 with demonstrating that sulfur supplementation protects monkeys from atherosclerosis
(11). This is the same Dr. Mann who was a fierce critic of the cholesterol-sat fat-heart disease hypothesis and opponent to
Ancel Keyes MD.

There are many choices when it comes to supplementing for sulfur. The most well-known and studied is MSM. Only found in
small amounts in food, MSM contains sulfur and is used for conditions ranging from arthritis to leaky gut to inflammation and
oxidative stress (12). NAC and alpha lipoic acid have been used with success. Glutathione is typically not well absorbed
orally but newer forms of liposomal glutathione and topical preparations may be better options.

Garlic supplements have plenty of data and there are some excellent companies including Kyolic and Biotics Research.
Another option is purified chondroitin sulfates. The credit for this research starts with Lester Morrison MD in the 1970s.

But recent data confirms the role of chondroitin sulfate in heart disease. It interferes with the pro-inflammatory activation of
monocytes and endothelial cells driven by TNF-. This serves to lower cardiac risk (13). As mentioned above, heparan
sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, dermatan sulfate, keratan sulfate are all major components of the glycocalyx and healthy
endothelial cell function.
Monsanto and Glyphosate

When it comes to the toxicity of glyphosate, Stephanie Seneff PhD is the authority. She views coronary artery disease as a
deficiency is cholesterol sulfate.

And what inhibits the formation of cholesterol sulfate? Thats right, glyphosate. Not only does glyphosate destroy gut
bacteria, but it inhibits the trans-sulfuration pathway. Read more from Dr. Seneff about the devastation caused from
glyphosate.

Related: Bombshell Secret Documents Show Monsanto Knew About Glyphosate Link To Cancer Over 35 Years Ago
+ How You Can Have Yourself Tested For Glyphosate Contamination

Summary

However you choose to do it, get more sulfate into your diet. Given the fact that sulfur containing foods and garlic
supplements are proven to lower heart disease risk, this advice is just what the doctor ordered.

Your heart, blood vessels, and the rest of your body will thank you. Now its time for me to prepare our dinner of wild salmon
with garlic aioli and a side of steamed organic Brussels sprouts. Maybe I will wash it down with a cool glass of Pellegrino.
Cheers.

Related Articles:

How Statins Degenerate Your Brain Health

Cardiology experts: Statins MUST be avoided at all costs!

Sugar Industry Manipulated Heart Studies, Review Finds

Great Britains Most Outspoken Cardiologist Sets the Record Straight on Saturated Fats
 Linus Paulings Unified Theory and Therapy for Heart Disease

Promoting Artery Health With Garlic and Onion

Unified Theory of Cardiovascular Disease

5G Telecomm Radiation The Perfect Tool To Mass Modify Human Brain Waves + More
Studies Reveal Dangers
September 16 2016 | From: WakingTimes / Mobilize

On 14 July 2016 the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) of the USA made space available
in the radio spectrum for consumer devices to operate within the 25 GHz to 100 GHz of the
electromagnetic spectrum.

It went on to say: The Commission has struck a balance between new wireless services, current and future fixed
satellite service operations, and federal uses. The item adopts effective sharing schemes to ensure that diverse
users including federal and non-federal, satellite and terrestrial, and fixed and mobile can co-exist and expand.

Related: This Is What WIFI, Cell Phones, iPads And More Are Doing To Your Childs Brain 100 + Scientists Are
Now Petitioning The UN

Nowhere in its document is mention made of consumer safety or well-being. I guess that is fair of the FCC because
historically, it is not interested in matters of microwave radiation and consequent thermal and non-thermal effects on the
population.
Lets face it, and most people find this hard to believe, the FCC works purely on behalf of the telecoms industries in
granting them access to the airwaves, no more and no less.

Industry was very happy to hear the FCC announcement on granting access of large portions of the radio spectrum for yet
more of its toys and other consumer devices. Qualcomm for example talks much about the massive internet of things, yet
nowhere on its 5G musings is mention made of consumer safety or well-being.

That pink elephant in the living room regarding safety brings me to the point of this article. The FCC and the telecomms
industry rub their hands with glee because lots of money is going to be made as 5G devices rollout yet no recent safety
studies have been carried out on consumer safety.

Yes, their official logo is actually that shit

Related: Gestapo In The USA: FCC Intimidates Press And Kills Free Speech At 5G Rollout

No doubt both the FCC and industry will point regulators to the old, out-dated and one-dimensional so-called safety studies
(thermal effects) produced by the ICNIRP. This private organisation is comprised of people and individuals who work in the
telecommunications industries with no background in epidemiology, toxicology, radio frequency safety or medical practice.

The implications of 5G on consumer well-being and safety do not look good for one reason: devices that will operate within
the 5G electromagnetic spectrum will use antennas that are physically small i.e. from a few millimetres to a centimetre in
length.

This means that industry will produce a variety of different antenna systems to do different things.

Qualcomms 5G Vision

5G is much more than higher peak rates - it needs to enable new classes of services, connect new devices and
industries, and empower new user experiences while fully leveraging 4G investments. The envisioned unified
platform needs to support all spectrum, below 6 GHz as well as above 6 GHz and mmWave."

Everything is awesome!

The weird fact of operating within this very high frequency range is that signals are mostly line of sight or they are easily
reflected, refracted or lost within the differing build composition of urban environment structures.

In other words, without careful antenna design and recognition of many of the pitfalls trying to propagate microwave signals
within urban environments, the signal can be easily degraded or completely lost. In response to these challenges, the
advantages in using very small physical size antennas in the millimetre wavelength is you can feed many antennas in various
configuration arrays e.g. vertical or horizontal arays, waveguide, coned or highly directional beam type designs.

These types of antenna designs focus most of the transmitted power into specified directions. This is bad news for
consumers because these very small physical size antennas will pack a mighty punch to our biological systems if we step
into them.

Getting back to consumer safety and well-being and all things microwave, it is clear that the latency period for adverse
biological effects from devices using microwave frequencies from say 1 GHz to 5 Ghz is approximately 10 - 20 years.

In 2016 there are now many thousands of peer-reviewed

medical and epidemiological studies that show, illustrate or
correlate, adverse biological effects with use of mobile
phone technology or WIFI.

Using frequencies even higher than 5 GHz (and up to 100

GHz) will compress the timeframe in which cancers and
other biological effects show themselves within society.

It is anyones guess on what might happen in terms of

biological safety yet it is clear to see that the pulsed nature
of these high frequency, high signal intensity signals do not
harbour good news for humanity, particularly in relation to
the functioning of our DNA.

Nowadays, exposure to microwave radiation or

frequencies used by WIFI, mobile phones, smart
phones, smart meters, WIFI-enabled audio devices,
WIFI-enabled fridges, most baby monitors and a whole
host of other esoteric electrical devices were recently
classed as Class 2B carcinogens.

Point of sale literature excludes this fact on any advertising

blurb and it is also fascinating that the small print embedded
deep within mobile phone product literature say that you
should not put these devices directly to your skin, body or
face.

If you do, you exceed the so-called safe exposure

thresholds put in place for these devices.

Getting back to the very small physical length of the antennas that will be used for 5G devices, it is very clear to surmise that
if these devices talk to each other using highly efficient, directional antennas, the ERP (effective radiated power) will be
huge.

If you happen to walk into this intensely focused beam of microwave radiation, what will this level of signal intensity do to
your biology?

Yet again, time will tell unless we get our arses into gear and demand proper safety studies from industry and
independent academia that focus on thermal and non-thermal effects on our biology.

Just like the advent of modern mobile phone technology, it is us, the consumers, who provide the guinea pig role in terms of
safety.

Sufferers of EHS (electro-hyper-sensitivity) will need to be aware of any 5G device simply because the electron volt assault
on their compromised bodies will be easily and instantly felt.

It is they who will suffer first and in time, everyone will be affected because one other fact the telecoms industries have not
mentioned is that in order to develop an efficient network of signals within an urban environment, many thousands of new
transmitter sites will need to be installed.
Related: WiFi Radiation New Device Makes It Visible At Last

The physical small size of these antennas means they can be covertly installed into all sorts of urban structures which
suggest that for urban dwellers at least, there will be no escape from exposure to these highly damaging microwave
frequencies. I also feel that when these antennas are in place, it will be relatively easy to alter and manipulate brain wave
function of its users and others close by.

The amount of ancillary information that can be piped or attached to the main carrier frequency of such a telecommunications
network system is potentially, huge.

Police forces the world over use Tetra as a systems of communication. This system also includes a sub-carrier
frequency of about 16 Hz which is very close to our natural brainwave patterns.

Could this 16 Hz ancillary pulsed ELF (extremely low-frequency) be responsible for instilling aggressive behaviours
in our police force personnel?

The zombie apocalypse might just be around the corner unless of course, we refuse to comply. That is our choice.

Mobilize

Mobilize is an investigative documentary that explores the long-term health effects of cell phone radiation, including
cancer and infertility.

Clear Light Ventures is sponsoring free viewing of Mobilize from September 15 to October 16, 2016 - enter promo code
"ClearLight".

Film Synopsis
In 2011 the World Health Organization stated, The electromagnetic fields produced by mobile phones are classified by the
International Agency for Research on Cancer as possibly carcinogenic to humans. The cell phone industry has vigorously
disputed these findings.

Mobilize is an explosive investigative documentary that explores the potential long-term health effects from cell phone
radiation, including brain cancer and infertility.

The politically charged film examines the most recent scientific research and the harsh challenges politicians face trying to
pass precautionary legislation. Featuring interviews with expert researchers, mobile phone industry representatives, and
prominent politicians, MOBILIZE illuminates how industrys economic and political influence can corrupt public health.

Featuring Gavin Newsom Lt. Governor of California, Lawrence Lessig, Esq., Steve Wozniak, Richard Branson, Devra Davis,
PhD, MPH and many more.

To watch Mobilize click here

How Much Of This Junk Are You Exposed To?

September 16 2016 | From: Inquisitr / Sott / NaturalNews / GreenMedInfo

We all know about toxins and poisons in the environment - the slow kill. Keep the populace sick
while the globalist corporatocracy bleeds us dry of money for power whilst they get off on their
depopulation Eugenics agenda.

Awareness of 'environmental toxins' that are literally all around us helps you keep some of the crap out of your
system...

Related: Lawsuit reveals extent of DuPont's C8 Teflon cover-up

Antibacterial Soap Banned By FDA, Commonly Used Chemicals May Do More Harm
Than Good
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has banned antibacterial soap sales in the United
States, and the reason why is incredibly disturbing.

Many people have turned to antibacterial soap for years, believing them to be a safe and effective way to remove
dirt and germs from the body and hands, and more effective than traditional soap and water. However, when the
FDA banned the popular soaps, they informed the public that they might not be so effective after all.

Whats more and infinitely more disturbing, according to the FDA, the chemicals most commonly used in antibacterial soaps
may not even be safe.

A total of 19 chemicals often used in antibacterial soaps have been targeted by the FDA, and the agency has given
manufacturers only a year to remove them all from the products they are selling (and marketing as safe and effective) to the
public.

As The New York Times reports, while nearly 20 chemicals were involved in the decision that led to the antibacterial soap
being banned by the FDA, two are the primary culprits. Triclosan and triclocarban are used in both bar and liquid
antibacterial soap, and they are almost everywhere.

When the FDA banned antibacterial soap this week based on the risks of using the product often outweighing the benefits,
they didnt ban the questionable chemicals from all products.

Reportedly, at least one toothpaste uses a now-banned chemical, but according to the FDA, in that product its risks are less
than the benefits it provides to consumers.
While the news that antibacterial soap has been banned by the FDA may be shocking and sudden to some, the truth of the
matter is that there have been questions about its safety for years and years.

As Smithsonian Magazine reports, the FDA has been threatening to ban antibacterial soap for years. In the article,
published in 2014, cited questions that the FDA had about the safety and effectiveness of antibacterial soap.

Even then, the FDA warned that antibacterial soap would be banned if manufacturers didnt prove that it was both safe and
more effective than using soap and water.

Apparently, the industry was unable to prove that antibacterial soap is safe or provides a public benefit that outweighs the
potential risk of exposure of the chemicals used in the product.

At the time of the Smithsonian Magazine article, triclosan (with is banned as part of the FDAs sweeping decision on
antibacterial soap) was used in roughly 30 percent of all bar soap and 75 percent of liquid antibacterial soap. In 2014, the
antibacterial soap industry, now banned by the FDA, was worth about $1 billion.

In 2014, the antibacterial soap industry was put on notice by the FDA. They were told to prove the safety of their product by
2016 or see their product banned. Despite the fact that manufacturers had turned antibacterial soap into a $1 billion industry
and were given two years, they chose not to put together the required proof that they were selling a product that is safe and
effective.
And plenty of people are speculating that the reason that the antibacterial soap industry didnt prove to the FDA that their
product is safe is that they know that it isnt.

But rather than simply removing it from the market themselves (or demonstrate its safety), the antibacterial soap industry
continued to use the questionable chemicals and sell personal hygiene products that may not be safe until the FDA
announced that the products were banned.

Even now, antibacterial soap can be legally sold, despite questions about its safety.

In the aftermath of the announcement that the FDA had banned antibacterial soap, public health professionals have
overwhelmingly supported the decision, adding that the chemicals in antibacterial soap can alter the hormones of children
and even contribute to the problem of antibiotic-resistant superbugs.

It has boggled my mind why we were clinging to these compounds, and now that they are gone I feel liberated
 They had absolutely no benefit but we kept them buzzing around us everywhere. They are in breast milk, in urine,
in blood, in babies just born, in dust, in water.

Recent studies into the chemicals found in antibacterial soap products have resulted in some very disturbing discoveries
regarding the harm they can do to animals and likely to humans, too.

Among the problems caused by the now-banned products include severe abnormalities having to do with metabolism and
reproduction. According to the CDC, the chemicals found in FDA banned antibacterial soap have been found in the bodily
waste of 75 percent of U.S. residents.

Related: Why Touching Receipts Can Harm Your Health

Kinder and Lindt Chocolate Bars Revealed to Contain Cancer-Causing Carcinogens

Tests carried out by a German watchdog revealed Kinder chocolate bars and two other brands
tested positive for a hazardous cancer-causing substance.

Surprise!

Foodwatchcalled for Ferrero's Kinder Riegel, Lindt's Fioretto Nougat Minis, and Sun Rice Classic Schokohappen by
Rbezahl to be taken off the shelves on Monday after tests found "possible carcinogens."

The sweet treats had been contaminated with "so-called aromatic mineral oils (MOAH)," says Foodwatch, but the
manufacturers are allegedly reluctant to recall their products.
 "The manufacturer is guilty of gross negligence. Instead of clearing the dangerous candy from the shelves
and alerting consumers, they [postulate]... that everything was undertaken legally," said Foodwatch's
John Heeg.

Foodwatch tested more than 20 different kinds of potato chips and chocolate snacks and found saturated
mineral oils (MOSH) which it warned can "accumulate in the human body and [cause] long term damage to
organs" with children particularly at risk.

"There is no acceptable levels of mineral oils in food for consumption," Heeg told the German edition of The Local,
citing the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) who he says considers MOAHs "likely carcinogenic and
mutagenic."

"You can't see it, you can't taste it, but it's in there," warned Hegg. "We recommend not purchasing these products
because the levels are simply unacceptable for consumption."

Kinder Riegel, "one of the best-selling chocolate bars in Germany," had the worst MOSH and MOAH values. The chemicals
are usually transferred to foods through recycled packaging that previously had been printed with inks which may contain
oils.

Foodwatch is calling for strict limits on saturated mineral oils (MOSH) in food and a zero tolerance for aromatic mineral oils
(MOAH).

Brain Damaging Heavy Metal Mercury Found in Grocery Products Made With High
Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS)

HFCS is ubiquitous in the modern processed food supply. It's added to pizza sauce, salad
dressings, ketchup and "whole wheat" breads. Did you know it's often contaminated with the toxic
heavy metal mercury?
The following excerpt is from my new book Food Forensics, available now for preorder on Amazon.com or Barnes
& Noble.

Watch the video trailer for Food Forensics at this Youtube link. What follows is extracted from a near-final manuscript of the
book:

HFCS and Mercury Contamination

High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is a highly processed sweetener made primarily from corn and found in a plethora of food
and beverages on grocery store shelves.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service estimated in 2011 that the average consumer per capita
consumes nearly 42 pounds of high fructose corn syrup per year. Not one, but two studies in 2009 found that HFCS
commercially produced in America and American-bought HFCS products were tainted with mercury.

The first study published in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Health found that, of twenty samples collected and
analyzed from three different manufacturers, nine, or 45 percent, came back tainted with mercury.
The second study by watchdog group Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP) purchased fifty-five food items from
popular brands off grocery store shelves in the fall of 2008 -- items in which HFCS was the first or second principal
ingredient -- and detected mercury in nearly a third of them.

The contamination may have been due to the fact that mercury cells are still used in the production of caustic soda, an
ingredient used to make HFCS.

The HFCS mercury plot thickens, however. Online news outlet Grist reported that the lead researcher in the Environmental
Health study, Renee Dufault, previously worked as an FDA researcher.

Dufault had apparently turned over the information contained in her HFCS mercury study to the agency back in 2005, but
the FDA reportedly sat on it and did nothing, so Dufault went public with it after she retired in 2008.

How Big Food Cornered the Market with a Liquid Sweetener

Initial attempts to get corn syrup widely dispersed into the U.S. food supply in the 1970s didn't really take off because sugar
was so cheap and abundant at the time. However, this changed, as U.S.- imposed tariffs decreased sugar imports
throughout the 1970s and early 1980s, making sugar significantly more expensive in America than in other parts of the
world.

The surface explanation for these tariffs was to protect American sugar farmers; behind the scenes, however, Big Agra
interests had lobbied for the policy to promote what would become a new source of sugar - derived from corn - which soon
emerged as a popular commodity that was sold at a price significantly cheaper than cane sugar or beet sugar.
Archer Daniels Midland opened the first large-scale plant in 1978 (before they acquired the Clinton Corn Processing
Company) to produce 90 percent HFCS and 55 percent HFCS. By January 1980, Coca-Cola began allowing high fructose
corn syrup to be used as a sweetener at 50 percent levels with regular sugar; Pepsi Cola followed suit by 1983.

By November 1984, both major soft drink brands had approved full sweetening with HFCS, and HFCS quickly captured 42
percent of the sweetener market. The rising dominance of HFCS allowed it to maintain commercial prices similar to sugar
until the 1990s.

Government Money Subsidizing Corn Syrup

For the past several decades, the U.S. government has paid subsidies to American farmers to grow tons of corn (much of
which -- nearly 90 percent -- is genetically modified) and shifted domestic agricultural policy to maximize corn crops. This
made high-fructose corn syrup and other corn-derived processed ingredients much cheaper for industrial food
manufacturers to use.

Today, HFCS is nearly ubiquitous on American grocery store shelves. It can be found in a wide range of items, including
candy, ice cream, bread, chips, snacks, soups, soft drinks, fruit drinks and other beverages, condiments, jellies, deli meats,
and much, much more.
Overall, Americans consume about fifty to sixty pounds of high fructose corn syrup per capita an insane amount. HFCS
has been linked in scientific research to obesity, diabetes, heart disease, fatty liver and other contributors of bad health and
early death.

As the biggest dietary source of fructose, HFCS also promotes insulin resistance and increasing uric acid levels, which
contribute to metabolic dysfunction and type 2 diabetes. Further, researchers in 2008 found a correlation between high
fructose consumption and liver scarring in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is present in nearly a third of
American adults.

Corn Refiners Association Attempts to Hoodwink Consumers

On top of lobbying efforts, the Corn Refiners Association, an industry organization of which Archer Daniels Midland a is a
key member, launched the website sweetsurprise.com as a media relations ploy to debunk "myths" about HFCS and clarify
"The Facts about High Fructose Corn Syrup."

It also ran well-funded TV advertising starting in 2008 sticking up for the industry's favorite sweetener and asserting that
"sugar is sugar," which prompted a lawsuit by sugar producers claiming false advertising in 2011. The FDA also demanded
the corn industry stop using the term "corn sugar" without approval.

In 2012, the FDA rejected a petition filed by the Corn Refiners Association in 2010 to change the name of high-fructose corn
syrup to "corn sugar" for the purposes of food labeling and advertising. The Corn Refiners Association claims that it wanted
the name change to "educate consumers," the majority of whom are "confused about HFCS."

To keep reading, get my new book Food Forensics, available now for pre-order everywhere books are sold.

How Sucralose (Splenda) Affects Health [Artificial Sweeteners in General]

The emergence of sucralose came from the fight against obesity, but did we trade one problem for
another?

This video was originally published on NutritionFacts.org and republished with permission.

In the United States, sucralose (the sweet tasting chemical in Splenda brand artificial sweeteners) was approved for use by
the FDA in 1998. It was deemed safe, but we no have over a decades worth of research to prove that sucralose affects
health in a very negative and very unique way.

The only effect they thought it would have on health was that it could potentially trigger migraines in a small percentage of
people.

This, they decided, was a small enough issue that the FDA allowed the substance into the marketplace, citing obesity as a
more pressing issue. They could not have been more wrong.

One of the major complications that can come from obesity is diabetes, where the body no longer responds to insulin
properly. Originally meant to combat issues like obesity-caused diabetes, lab tests show that insulin resistance increases by
as much as 20% after ingesting the sugar substitute.
The cause can be traced back to gut bacteria and how sucralose and other artificial sweeteners can alter their
environments. For example; Aspartame is another type of artificial sweetener which studies have shown is metabolized in
the body as formaldehyde, a known carcinogen.

Furthermore, alterations in gut bacteria are also very likely the culprit behind the rise in inflammatory bowel diseases
like Crohns disease.

In every part of the world where sucralose has been approved, inflammatory bowel disease has increased. Clearly, there is
a causal link between this substance and the health of our gut.

Though the alternative to sugar was created in an effort to combat obesity, with all of the complications and damage it can
cause, its clear that how sucralose affects health negatively. This just further proves that we can all do ourselves a service
by sticking to natural foods whose benefits dont have to be decided on by a committee.

Local Councils, Medical Trials And GMOs: Call For Nick Smiths Resignation
September 8 2016 | From: Scoop

The scaremongering and misrepresentation of the Auckland Unitary councils long term plan
shows that Dr. Nick Smith is deliberately twisting and misrepresenting the facts, and raising fears
that important medical research will be banned. Yet he knows any such concern is false.
The AUP expressly excludes medical and veterinary applications stating Potential GMO activities of relevance
include GM food crops, trees, grasses, animals and pharma crops, but,exclude research within contained
laboratories involving GMOs, medical applications involving the manufacture and use of GM products

Related: Pesticide Special Report

In seeking to mislead the public, the Minister is following the lead of Federated Farmers of New Zealand. Federated
Farmers challenged the right of councils, who govern under the Resource Management Act (RMA), to place precautionary
GE wording in their plans, in the Environment Court.

The challenge was not upheld. They then appealed the Environment Courts decision to the High Court, which has now
dismissed the appeal.

The Minister's anti-democratic panicked response of introducing a new law that expressly prohibits councils to consider
environmental and land use protections around GMOs, shows a cynical contempt for due process and local democracy.
It is an indictment on Dr. Smith and shows that he is not working for the good of the country but is using his powers and
influence to pursue an agenda outside of his responsibilities as a Minister.

This serious breach of conduct transgresses his responsibilities as a minister. He is apparently unable to avoid his conflicts
of interest around the GE issue.

This terrible situation leads us to call for his resignation as a Minister of the Crown.

Local Councils, Medical Trials And GMOs

Medical trials involving genetically modified vaccines and other GM treatments will still be allowed
under planning changes Auckland and three other local councils are making.
Auckland councillors this week agreed to a ban on the general release of genetically modified organisms under the
city's Unitary Plan.

That has led to concerns that a medical trial involving genetically modified organisms would be stopped in its tracks.

Environment Minister Dr Nick Smith said that the Government would review the "appropriateness of councils being involved
in regulating genetically modified organisms".

A trial for liver cancer vaccine Pexa-Vec is being conducted at Auckland Hospital which involves a GMO. The new
Auckland Unitary Plan prohibits the release of any GMO and would not allow any such future medical
treatments, Dr Smith said in a press release.

The SMC put together the following Expert Q&A with Dr Kerry Grundy, Team Leader (Futures Planning), Whangarei
District Council. (Contact Dr Grundy on 09 430 4200)

Dr Grundy is convenor of the Inter-council Working party on GMO Risk Evaluation and Management
Options (comprising Auckland Council, Whangarei District Council, Far North District Council, and Northland
Regional Council).*

1: Will existing and/or future medical trials involving GMOs be banned in these regions as a result of the plan
changes?

I can confirm that the GMO provisions in all planning documents do not affect medical applications involving
GMOs including present and future applications. These are permitted."
 "The plan provisions apply only to outdoor use of GMOs, i.e. GMOs released to the environment or outdoor field
trial of GMOs. They do not apply to indoor use in contained facilities, laboratories, hospitals or to medical
applications or most veterinary applications."

2. As part of the plan provisions, do the Councils require any additional notification of, or approval for, GM-related
trials (medical or otherwise) than is currently required through the likes of the Environmental Protection Authority?

The councils plan provisions make outdoor field trials of GMOs a discretionary activity under the RMA. This
means they need a resource consent from council to conduct a field trial in addition to approval from the EPA."

"The resource consent will require strict liability from the party conducting the trial for any environmental or
economic damage that may occur as a result of the trial together with a bond to cover any costs should they arise
(HSNO does not require this)."

"This does not apply to medical trials as medical applications are specifically excluded from council provisions. In
addition, the definition of field trials in the plan provisions refers only to 'outdoor' field trials."

3. Are there any specific provisions relating to patients involved in medical trials who are being treated with GM
therapies - such as the Pexa-Vec liver cancer vaccine? For instance, relating to where the vaccines can be
administered, or where patients are housed while receiving treatment?

There are no specific provisions relating to patients involved in medical trials who are being treated with GM
therapies presently or in the future. Medical applications are not subject to the plan provisions. They are treated as
permitted activities under the RMA. They require no consent from council. Council has no role in relation to them."

4. Are there currently any outdoor trials of GMOs underway in any of the regions governed by the four Councils
that have contributed to the plan?

There are no outdoor field trials that I am aware of underway in any of the jurisdictions covered by the councils in
Auckland and Northland who have or are in the process of putting GMO provisions in their planning documents."

5. What provisions have the Councils made for the possible future introduction of new genetic technologies, such
as gene-editing techniques, and their evaluation and classification as GM according to the plan?

Councils have made no specific provisions for possible future introduction of new genetic techniques and their
classification as GM according to the plans. Councils only regulate GMOs as defined in the HSNO Act."
 "The plans definition of a GMO is the same as the HSNO definition. If an organism produced by a new technique
is included as a GMO under the HSNO Act it will be treated as such by the plans. If an organism produced by a
new technique is not defined as a GMO under HSNO it will not be caught by the plan provisions."

*The GMO plan provisions that are in the Auckland Unitary Plan and in plan changes to the WDC and FNDC GMO
plan changes are based on research and documentation produced by the Working Party.

1080: NZ Animals Killed For No Reason In $80m Yearly 1080 Drops

September 6 2016 | From: Various

Over 80 million dollars, including farmers hard earned cash, is spent every year eradicating a
disease, that by World standards, doesn't exist...

The Agency considered that acute exposures to 1080 in humans and animals may give rise to irreversible adverse,
target organ [heart and brain] effects. These effects are severe.

Related: Satanists Escape Plan Involves Killing Natives Of New Zealand

Continued presence of predators (rats, mice, cats, stoats) [on Rangitoto Island after 1080 cereal operation]..ongoing
predation..less than expected bird population recoveries (2004)
Related Links & Information on 1080:

What DOC doesnt want you to know about 1080 Poison

"The recent post about 89 dead Kiwis that DOC didnt bother to test for 1080 poisoning relates to this report of birds that
actually were tested. Thanks to the person with a conscience who let the public know what is going on!"

TVwild.co.nz

More 1080 videos + If you have your pets, farm stock, deer, trout or eels, native wildlife (including birds), poisoned on or
near your property or have any information to share with regard to aerial 1080 poison drops taking place near you, please let
us know
1080Science.co.nz

Introduction Environmental Risk Management Authoritys 1080 Documents + factual evidence against 1080.

Monsanto Promoting Worldwide Infertility? + Academic GMO Shills Exposed: Fraud

And Collusion With Monsanto
September 6 2016 | From: Sott / NaturalNews

Monsanto has a long and infamous history of manufacturing and bringing to market such
chemicals as DDT, Agent Orange, aspartame, Roundup and dioxin - chemical compounds from
which society continues to feel the effects.

In an effort to distance the current corporation from past deeds, Monsanto refers to the company prior to 2002 as
"the former Monsanto" in their news releases. However, nothing has really changed aside from their PR machine.
While Monsanto has branched into genetic engineering (GE) of plants, the sale of patented GE seeds simply feeds the need
for the company's pesticides. Monsanto is STILL primarily a purveyor of toxins, not life.

Monsanto began forging a unique and financially advantageous relationship with the U.S. government starting with the
company's involvement in the Manhattan Project that produced the first nuclear weapons during World War II. During the
Vietnam War they were the leading producer of Agent Orange.

Related: The Complete History Of Monsanto, The Worlds Most Evil Corporation

The specialization in the production and distribution of toxic chemicals continues today.

Their influence over government runs so deep that despite the fact 64 other countries have been labeling genetically
engineered (GE) foods for years, the U.S. now has the distinction of being the first country to un-label GE foods at
the urging of a company producing mass amounts of GE seeds.

Monsanto and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

In the latter part of the 1920s, Monsanto was the largest producer of PCBs. This chemical was used in lubricant for electric
motors, hydraulic fluids and to insulate electrical equipment. Old fluorescent light fixtures and electrical appliances with PCB
capacitors may still contain the chemical.

During the years PCB was manufactured and used, there were no controls placed on disposal. Since PCBs don't break
down under many conditions, they are now widely distributed through the environment and have made the journey up the
food chain.

Between the inception and distribution of the product and its subsequent ban in the late 1970s, an estimated 1.5 billion
pounds were distributed in products around the world.

Monsanto was the primary manufacturer of PCBs in the U.S. under the trade name Aroclor. Health problems associated
with exposure to the chemical were noted as early as 1933 when 23 of 24 workers at the production plant developed
pustules, loss of energy and appetite, loss of libido and other skin disturbances.
According to Monsanto's public timeline, it was in 1966 that "Monsanto and others began to study PCB persistence in the
environment." However, seven years earlier, Monsanto's assistant director of their Medical Department wrote:

... [S]ufficient exposure, whether by inhalation of vapors or skin contact, can result in chloracne which I think we
must assume could be an indication of a more systemic injury if the exposure were allowed to continue."

In 1967, Shell Oil called to inform Monsanto of press reports from Sweden, noting that PCBs were accumulating in
mammals further up the food chain. Shell asked for PCB samples to perform their own analytical studies.

With full knowledge of the devastation expected to the environment and humanity, it wasn't until 11 years later, in 1977, that
Monsanto reportedly pulled production on PCB.

PCBs Are Probable Human Carcinogens

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National
Toxicology Program, and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIEHS) have identified PCBs as either
probable, potential or reasonably likely to cause cancer in humans.

If it seems like these agencies are couching their words, they are. Human studies have noted increased rates of liver
cancer, gall bladder cancer, melanomas, gastrointestinal cancer, biliary tract cancer, brain cancer and breast
cancer when individuals had higher levels of PCB chemicals in their blood and tissue.

However, the EPA limits the ability of researchers to link a chemical as a carcinogen unless there is conclusive proof. While
this proof is evident in animal studies, you can't feed these chemicals to humans and record the results. Thus PCBs are a
"probable" carcinogen in humans.

Other health effects from PCBs include:

Babies born with neurological and motor control delays including lower IQ, poor short-term memory and poor
performance on standardized behavioral assessment tests
 Disrupted sex hormones including shortened menstrual cycles, reduced sperm count and premature puberty

Imbalanced thyroid hormone affecting growth, intellectual and behavioral development

Immune effects, including children with more ear infections and chickenpox

Once PCBs are absorbed in the body they deposit in the fat tissue. They are not broken down or excreted. This means the
number of PCBs build over time and move up the food chain. Smaller fish are eaten by larger ones and eventually land on
your dinner table.

Chemical Poisoning Begins Before Birth

A recent study at the University of California demonstrated that PCBs are found in the blood of pregnant women. Before
birth, the umbilical cord delivers approximately 300 quarts of blood to your baby every day.

Not long ago, researchers believed the placenta would shield your developing baby from most pollutants and chemicals.
Now we know it does not.

The umbilical cord is a lifeline between mother and child, sustaining life and propelling growth. However, in recent research
cord blood contained between 200 and 280 different chemicals; 180 were known carcinogens and 217 were toxic to the
baby's developing nervous system.

The deposits of chemicals in your body or the body of your developing baby are called your "body burden" of chemicals and
pollution.

A steady stream of chemicals from the environment during a critical time of organ and system development has a
significant impact on the health of your child, both in infancy and as the child grows to adulthood.

Tracey Woodruff, Ph.D., director of the University of California San Francisco Program on Reproductive Health and the
Environment, was quoted in a press release, saying:

It was surprising and concerning to find so many chemicals in pregnant women without fully knowing the
implications for pregnancy. Several of these chemicals in pregnant women were at the same concentrations that
have been associated with negative effects in children from other studies.
 In addition, exposure to multiple chemicals that can increase the risk of the same adverse health outcome can
have a greater impact than exposure to just one chemical."

Butyl Benzyl Phthalate - Another Monsanto Product

Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), also manufactured by Monsanto, was recently implicated in cell fat storage. This specific
phthalate was found in human fluids and had an effect on the accumulation of fat inside cells.

BBP is used in the manufacture of vinyl tile, as a plasticizer in PVC pipe, carpets, conveyer belts and weather stripping in
your home and office.

Like other phthalates used in the production of plastics, BBP is not bound to the product and can be released into your
environment. It may be absorbed by crops and move up the food chain. The biggest source of exposure is food.

Drive-through hamburgers and take-out pizzas may be increasing your intake of phthalates. The danger is not in the food
itself but in the products used to handle it. The study analyzed data from nearly 9,000 individuals, finding the one-third who
had eaten at a fast food restaurant had higher levels of two different phthalates.
Potentially, BBP may adversely affect your reproductive function. However, at lower doses it also has an effect on your
kidneys, liver and pancreas. Increased risks of respiratory disorders and multiple myelomas have also been reported in
people who have exposure to products manufactured with BBP. An increasing waistline from BBP exposure may also
reduce your fertility.

Low Sperm Count and Infertility Affecting Animals and Humans

A 26-year study of fertility in dogs, published recently, has distinct similarities to infertility rates in humans. In this study,
researchers evaluated the ejaculate of nearly 2,000 dogs. Over the 26 year period, they found a drop in sperm motility of 2.4
percent per year.

Additionally, both the semen and the testicles of castrated dogs contained by PCBs and phthalates, implicated in other
studies to reduction in fertility. Phthalates have been implicated in both decreased sperm motility and quality of your sperm,
affecting both fertility and the health of your children.

Researchers used dogs in this study as they live in the same environment as their owners, and often eat some of the same
food. This correlation between sperm function and concentration, and environment and food in dogs and humans is
significant.

In those 26 years there was also a rise in cryptorchidism in male pups (a condition where the testicles don't descend into the
scrotum) born to stud dogs who experienced a decline in sperm quality and motility.
Cryptorchidism and undescended testicles, occurs at a rate of 1 in 20 term male human infants and 1 in 3 pre-term babies.

Problems with infertility are also affecting marine animals at the top of the food chain. In the western waters of the Atlantic,
the last pod of Orcas are doomed to extinction. High levels of PCB have been found in the fat of over 1,000 dolphins and
Orcas in the past 20 years. Now taking a toll on the animal's fertility, this pod of Orcas has not reproduced in the 19 years it
has been under study.

Orcas were living in the North Sea until the 1960s. At that time PCB pollution peaked in the area and the Orca whales
disappeared. The same happened in the Mediterranean Sea, where the whales flourished until the 1980s. This pod off the
coast of the U.K. is the last living pod in that area.

Monsanto's Argument in PCB Lawsuits

Although Monsanto denies culpability and knowledge of the danger behind the chemical PCB, you'll discover internal
documentation in this video that they did, in fact, know of the danger while manufacturing and distributing the product.
Monsanto is currently embroiled in several lawsuits across eight cities and the argument is over who owns the rain. The
cities are suing Monsanto in Federal Court, saying PCBs manufactured by Monsanto have polluted the San Francisco Bay.

Monsanto attorney Robert Howard argues that because the city does not own the water rights, the city does not have the
right to sue. And, because the PCBs have not damaged city property, such as corroding pipes, Howard claims it is a state
problem. Scott Fiske, attorney for three cities, countered with the city's regulatory interests in management of storm water as
a fundamental function of the city.

While Fiske claims he can prove Monsanto knew the product was hazardous as early as 1969, Howard maintains the
company should not be liable for the use of the chemicals it produced.

In 2001, Monsanto attorneys in the Owens v. Monsanto case, acknowledged only one health threat from exposure to PCBs:
chloracne, and instead argued that since the entire planet has been contaminated, they are innocent of all liability. The
attorney for Monsanto was quoted in the Chemical Industry Archives, saying:
 The truth is that PCBs are everywhere. They are in meat, they are in everyone in the courtroom, they are
everywhere and they have been for a long time, along with a host of other substances."

The cities currently engaged in lawsuits against Monsanto for damage to the environment and waterways include Berkley,
Oakland, San Jose, Portland, Spokane, Seattle, Long Beach and San Diego. All eight cities attempted to combine their
cases against the agrochemical giant but were unsuccessful when one judge found the issues were different enough to
warrant separate cases.

Monsanto's Deep Pockets

Monsanto petitioned the Federal Court to dismiss Portland's lawsuit, claiming it would countersue, adding years to the
process. It is likely Monsanto would increase the scope of the case and include companies who used the product and
released the PCBs.

Meanwhile, three plaintiffs in St. Louis received better news in May 2016 when a jury awarded them a total of $46.5
million, finding Monsanto negligent in the production of PCBs.

This suit claimed Monsanto sold PCBs even after it learned about the dangers, bringing to court internal documents dated
1955, which stated: "We know Aroclors [PCBs] are toxic but the actual limit has not been precisely defined."33 To date this
win over Monsanto has been rare. Williams Kherkher, attorney for the plaintiffs, explained in EcoWatch:

The only reason why this victory is rare is because no one has had the money to fight Monsanto."

Kherkher and other firms pooled their resources in this case and expect wins in upcoming lawsuits. The firm has
accumulated the names of approximately 1,000 plaintiffs with claims against Monsanto and PCBs.
Related: The Daily Show takes on Monsanto

SAD NEWS: House Passes DARK Act Compromise

The House passed a compromise to the DARK Act that will force food distributors to disclose the presence of genetically
engineered (GE) ingredients with a smartphone scan code. President Obama has signed the bill that removes states' rights
for labeling GMOs. The bill is full of loopholes, which may allow genetically modified ingredients to slip through
unannounced.

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs), aka GE foods, are live organisms whose genetic components have been artificially
manipulated in a laboratory setting through creating unstable combinations of plant, animal, bacteria and even viral genes
that do not occur in nature or through traditional crossbreeding methods.

GMO proponents claim that genetic engineering is "safe and beneficial," and that it advances the agricultural industry. They
also say that GMOs help ensure the global food supply and sustainability.

But is there any truth to these claims? I believe not. For years, I've stated the belief that GMOs pose one of the
greatest threats to life on the planet. Genetic engineering is NOT the safe and beneficial technology that it is touted
to be.

Related: GMO ban expands in Russia as Putin halts all production and imports

The FDA cleared the way for GE Atlantic salmon to be farmed for human consumption. Thanks to added language in the
federal spending bill, the product will require special labeling so at least consumers will have the ability to identify the GE
salmon in stores. However, it's imperative ALL GE foods be labeled clearly without a smartphone scan code because not
everyone owns a smartphone.

The FDA is threatening the existence of our food supply. We have to start taking action now. I urge you to share this article
with friends and family. If we act together, we can make a difference and put an end to the absurdity.

Related: Venezuela passes new law rejecting GMOs and seed patents nationwide

Boycott Smart Labels Today

When you see the QR code or so-called Smart Label on a food product, pass it by. Products bearing the Grocery
Manufacturer's Association's (GMA) Smart Label mark are in all likelihood filled with pesticides and/or GMO ingredients.

The GMA's 300-plus members include chemical technology companies, GE seed and food and beverage companies.
Monsanto, Dow and Coca-Cola are just some of the heavy-hitters in this powerful industry group, which has showed no
qualms about doing whatever it takes to protect the interest of its members.

Don't waste your time searching through their website, which may or may not contain the information you're looking for. If
they insist on wasting your time and making your shopping difficult, why reward them with a purchase?

A little known fact is that the GMA actually owns the "Smart Label" trademark that Congress has accepted as a so-called
"compromise" to on-package GMO labeling, and that's another reason why I believe the Smart Label mark is the mark of
those with something to hide, such as Monsanto.

Will you financially support a corrupt, toxic and unsustainable food system, or a healthy, regenerative one? There are many
options available besides big-brand processed foods that are part of the "GMA's verified ring of deception."

You can:

Shop at local farms and farmers markets

Only buy products marked either "USDA 100 percent Organic" (which by law cannot contain GMOs), "100 percent
Grass-Fed" or "Non-GMO Verified"

If you have a smartphone and you don't mind using it, download the OCA's Buycott app to quickly and easily
identify the thousands of proprietary brands belonging to GMA members, so you can avoid them, as well as
identify the names of ethical brands that deserve your patronage

Last but not least, encourage good companies to reject QR codes and to be transparent and clear with their labeling. This
will eventually ensure that all GMO foods can easily be identified by the GMA's "verified ring of deception" mark that is the
Smart Label.

Campbell's, Mars, Kellogg's, ConAgra and General Mills all vowed to voluntarily comply with Vermont's GMO labeling law by
labeling all of their foods sold across the U.S.

Will their plans change now that the law has been passed by Congress and signed by the President? That remains to be
seen, but if you like these companies, I would encourage you to reach out to them and ask them to remain steadfast in their
promise.

Non-GMO Food Resources by Country

If you are searching for non-GMO foods, here is a list of trusted sites you can visit:

Organic Food Directory (Australia)

Eat Wild (Canada)

Organic Explorer (New Zealand)

Eat Well Guide (United States and Canada)

Farm Match (United States)

Local Harvest (United States)

Weston A. Price Foundation (United States)

Comment: Check out the informative videos in the following article America's monster: Monsanto

Few corporations in the world are as loathed - and as sinister - as Monsanto. But the threat it poses to people and planet
could be reaching new heights, as the World Health Organization has recently upgraded Monsanto's main product as
carcinogenic to humans. With protests against the agrochemical giant held in more than 40 countries in May, learn why the
global movement against Monsanto is of critical importance to our future.

In this episode of The Empire Files, Abby Martin issues a scathing expose on the corporate polluter, chronicling it's rise to
power, the collusion of its crimes by the US government and highlighting the serious danger it puts us in today.
Academic GMO Shills Exposed: Once-Secret Emails Reveal Gross Collusion With
Monsanto, Academic Fraud At The Highest Levels Inside U.S. Universities
U.S. Right to Know (USRTK), a non-profit organization dedicated to exposing the fraud and
corruption surrounding the food industry, launched an investigation into the intimate and
unethical relationship between the biotech industry and university faculty and staff, which is used
to manipulate public opinion about GMOs and to coerce the government into passing legislation
supportive of Big Ag's patented seeds and pesticides.

The investigation, which is still ongoing, reveals how biotech industry giants Monsanto, DuPont, Syngenta, Dow
AgroSciences and others, buy academics employed by taxpayer-funded universities to push GMOs and lobby
Congress to pass legislation favorable of their products, with one of the most high-profile examples including
attempts to derail states' rights to enact GMO-labeling laws.

The collusion between Big Food, its front groups and university staff has been exposed through thousands of emails and
documents obtained through a USRTK Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, which was meticulously filed over a six-
month period.

USRTK: Public deserves to know about flow of money and level of coordination between Big Ag
and public university scientists

The FOIA request sought to obtain emails and documents from 43 public university faculty and staff to learn more about the
biotech industry's public relations strategies. Records were requested from scientists, economists, law professors, extension
specialists and communicators, all of whom are employed by taxpayer-funded public institutions and steadily promote GMO
agriculture under the "independent" research.

Currently, USRTK has received thousands of documents in nine of their requests; however, much more information is
expected to be released as FOIA requests continue to be answered.

The documents received thus far expose how the biotech industry funds expenses for university faculty to travel the globe
promoting and defending GMOs and their associated pesticides, highlighting the shift that scientists have made from being
researchers to being actors in Big Ag PR campaigns.
Named the "Biofortified boys" by Alicia Maluafiti, executive director of Hawaii Crop Improvement Association (HCIA), a
biotech front group, the academics were awarded thousands, and in some cases, hundreds of thousands of dollars in
unrestricted grant money.

Dr. Kevin Folta, professor and chairman of the Horticultural Sciences Department at the University of Florida, Gainesville, is
one of the biotech industry's most cooperative "Biofortified boys." Emails show that Folta was enlisted to travel to Hawaii and
later to Pennsylvania to "testify to government bodies to oppose proposed mandatory genetically modified labeling
measures."

Folta has repeatedly denied ties to Monsanto or having accepted funds from them; however, newly released documents
prove otherwise, exposing him as a bald-faced liar and attack dog for the biotech industry.

Sponsored and organized by the HCIA, which includes Monsanto, DuPont, Dow AgroSciences, Syngenta and BASF, Folta
and others were recruited to meet with local business execs to lobby against Hawaii's proposed GMO-labeling law.

HCIA's Maluafiti writes:

"So please know that you are part of our overall public education strategy and specifically how do we use your
valuable time wisely while you are here in Hawaii (besides hitting the beaches!) I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Aloha!"

A second email authored by Renee Kester, wife of Dow AgroSciences R&D Leader Kirby Kester, who is also president of
the HCIA, thanks them for their support:

"First off I would like to thank you for all of the support you have given us over here in Hawaii with regards to our
recent legislative battles, it means a lot to all of us over here."
Monsanto asks academics to author articles promoting GMOs

In an effort to influence "thought leaders and influencers," Monsanto reached out to Dr. Folta and other academics, asking
them to author a series of pro-GMO policy briefs to be used for "outreach and engagement with policy makers and
consumers." The briefs were to be promoted as being authored by "independent scientists."

Eric Sachs, the chief of Monsanto's global scientific affairs group wrote:

"The key to success is participation by all of you recognized experts and leaders with the knowledge,
reputation and communication experience needed to communicate authoritatively to the target groups."

"You represent an elite group whose credibility will be strengthened by working together."

Recognizing participants' careers are at stake, Sachs offers the academics assurance by promising that he will protect their
"independence," as well as their reputations.

Some of the topics the academics were asked to write on include:

Meeting World Challenges (discuss how GMOs will save the world by addressing shrinking agricultural resources, food
security, food affordability and environmental sustainability).

Stifling Innovation (discuss how GM crop regulations stifle technological advancements and prevent GMOs from
improving overall quality of life).

Holding Activists Accountable assigned to Kevin Folta (discuss how anti-GMO activist campaigns spread false
information and if left unchallenged will limit consumer choice, increase food prices, decrease farmer viability and undermine
global food security).

GM Crop Safety (address consumer and policy maker concerns that GM crops aren't tested for safety, convince public
that they are proven safe).
 Consequences of Rejecting GM Crops (address public health fears and political resistance and concerns about
biodiversity and biological safety and intellectual property rights that create barriers to GM acceptance).

Sustainable Crop Systems (discuss how GM crop technology provides environmental benefits, increases yields and
improves productivity).

Responsible Choice (highlight the role GM crop technology plays in ensuring increase production and how it balances
our needs for food, feed, fiber and fuel). Academics were asked to include a "call to action," which would be used in the
briefs to influence the public on a variety of platforms including social media, blogs, websites and allied organizations.

Montano enlists university scientists to pressure EPA to abandon proposed pesticide regulations

Documents reveal that Monsanto also used academics to put pressure on regulatory agencies like the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) in one instance pressuring the EPA to abandon its proposal to tighten regulations regarding
pesticide use on insect-resistant crops.

"Is there a coordinated plan to maintain pressure and emphasis on EPA's evolving regulations?" asked Sachs in
an email to Dr. Bruce Chassy, a professor emeritus at the University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign.

Sachs continued, "Have you considered having a small group of scientists request a meeting with Lisa Jackson
[referring to the EPA's administrator at the time]?"

With the help of an industry lobbyist, Chassy was eventually able to set up a meeting with Jackson, after which the agency's
proposal was ultimately dropped.

Stay tuned for more as Natural News continues to dissect documents exposing the incestuous relationship between the
biotech industry and university scientists.

Related Articles:
The sheer volume of information exposing Monsanto is overwhelming - yet where are the mainstream media on
this?

Owned and censored is where - impotent to report on anything but PR spin, lies, fluff and sports.

World Health Organization Admits Roundup Probably Causes Cancer

MIT Researcher: Glyphosate Herbicide Will Cause Half Of All Children To Have Autism By 2025

Union Of 30,000 Doctors In Latin America Wants Monsanto Banned!

Zika HOAX exposed by South American doctors: Brain deformations caused by larvicide chemical linked to
Monsanto; GM mosquitoes a 'total failure'

The Case of Glyphosate: Product Promoters Masquerading as Regulators?

Bill Gates, Monsanto & Saudi Arabia are Raping Nigeria with Terror & GMO

Monsanto Exposed as Source for White Phosphorus Used in Gaza Massacre

Glyphosate Herbicide Found in 14 Popular Beer Brands from Germany

Venezuela passes new law rejecting GMOs and seed patents nationwide

Glyphosate: Pathways to Modern Diseases

Supermodel Christie Brinkley Christie Brinkley Slams Monsanto, Speaks Out in Favor of GMO Labeling

Genetically Engineered Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation

 How GMO Foods Turn Your Intestines Into an Insecticide Factory

Oakland sues Monsanto for long-standing contamination of San Francisco Bay

EPA Raises Alarm Over GMO Crops that Are Breeding Swarms of These Mutant Bugs

Academic GMO shills exposed: Once-secret emails reveal gross collusion with Monsanto, academic fraud at the
highest levels inside U.S. universities

New England Journal of Medicine article calls for labeling of GM foods

Avengers actor Mark Ruffalo is aggressively fighting the Bayer, Monsanto merger

Zika virus or insecticide Pyriproxyfen - which is behind rise in microcephaly cases?

What is the Zika Virus Epidemic Covering Up?

Autism - Made in the U S A - Gary Null's Remarkable Documentary

MIT States That Half of All Children May be Autistic by 2025 due to Monsanto

Bayer defies critics with $62 billion Monsanto offer

Nazi-founded Bayer chemical company wants to buy Satan-inspired Monsanto for $42 billion... it's a perfect match
made in chemical Hell

How Monsanto stifles criticism

Monsanto To Merge With Whole Foods For New Health Store 365

GE Food Venture: Chronically Dependent On Deception

September 1 2016 | From: Uncensored

Although it purports to be based on solid science and the open flow of information on which
science depends, the massive venture to reconfigure the genetic core of the worlds food supply
has substantially relied on the propagation of falsehoods.
Its advancement and very survival have been crucially and chronically dependent on the misrepresentation of
reality to the extent that more than thirty years after the creation of the first genetically engineered plant, the vast
majority of people the world-over (including most government officials, journalists, and even scientists) continue to
be misled about the important facts.

Related: High Court ruling on GE a win for democracy

Moreover, contrary to what people would expect, the biotechnology industry has not been the main source of the
deceptions.Instead, the chief misrepresentations have been issued by respected government agencies and eminent
scientists and scientific institutions.

The following paragraphs describe several of the key deceptions and delinquencies that have been essential in enabling the
genetically engineered (GE) food venture to advance all of which are more thoroughly documented in my book: Altered
Genes, Twisted Truth.

The Disaster Caused by GEs First Edible Product Was Obfuscated

The genetic engineering venture received an alarming jolt when its first ingestible product caused an epidemic that killed
dozens of Americans and seriously sickened thousands, permanently disabling many of them.

The product was a food supplement of the essential amino acid L-tryptophan that had been derived from genetically altered
bacteria. Although it met the standards for pharmacological purity, like all other tryptophan supplements it contained minute
amounts of impurities.

However, unlike the conventionally produced supplements, one or more of its accidental additions was highly toxic, even at
extremely low levels.
Because none of the tryptophan supplements produced via non-engineered bacteria had ever been linked to disease, and
because genetic engineering can create unintended disruptions within the altered organisms, there were legitimate reasons
to suspect that the process had induced the formation of the extraordinarily toxic substance that caused the calamity.

Consequently, the proponents of genetic engineering, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (the FDA),
which admits it has a policy to foster biotechnology, strove to convince the public that the technology was blameless.[ii]

But to do so, they had to issue a string of deceptive statements. Those deceptions have been highly successful.
Consequently, despite the fact the evidence points to genetic engineering as the most likely cause of the toxic
contamination, most people who know of this tragedy are under the illusion that the technology has been exonerated.[iii]

Worse, because GE proponents routinely claim that none of its products has ever been linked to a health problem, most
people arent even aware that such a catastrophe happened.

The Problems Linked to the First GE Whole Food Were Also Covered Up

The first whole food produced via genetic engineering (Calgenes Flavr Savr tomato) was also problematic. Calgene
voluntarily conducted feeding studies, and the FDA scientists who reviewed them expressed concern about a pattern of
stomach lesions that raised a safety issue.

The Pathology Branch concluded that safety had not been demonstrated, and other FDA experts concurred. One wrote that
the data:

Raise a question of safety and that they fall short of satisfactorily resolving it.[iv] Another agreed that . . .
unresolved questions still remain.[v]
Nevertheless, the FDA claimed that its scientists had determined that all safety questions had been resolved and that the
tomato had been demonstrated to be just as safe as other tomatoes. And because the FDA kept a lid on its scientists
memos, no one outside the agency was aware of the fraud.

The memos only came to light four years later (in 1998) when my organization, the Alliance for Bio-Integrity, led a lawsuit
that compelled the FDA to hand over more than 44,000 pages of its internal files.

However, because the mainstream media has failed to adequately report what those documents reveal, most people are still
unaware of the FDAs misbehavior.

GE Foods Reached the Market Through Governmental Fraud

If the actual facts about the toxic tryptophan and the troubling tomato had been disclosed, the GE food venture might well
have been brought to a halt and at minimum would have been slowed and subjected to more rigorous testing. A similar
effect would have resulted if concerns that other FDA experts had expressed about GE foods in general had been
publicized.

Those concerns appeared in memos written a few years before the GE tomato entered the market, and they reveal that the
agencys scientists didnt agree with the biotech proponents claims that GE is substantially the same as conventional
breeding.

For example, an FDA microbiologist stated:

There is a profound difference between the types of unexpected effects from traditional breeding and genetic
engineering. He added that GE . . . may be more hazardous . . . [vi]

A toxicologist warned that GE plants could contain unexpected new toxins.[vii]

The Director of FDAs Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) stated:

CVM believes that animal feeds derived from genetically modified plants present unique animal and food safety
concerns. [viii]

He explained that residues of unexpected substances could make meat and milk products harmful to humans.

The pervasiveness of the concerns is attested by an FDA official who studied the expert input and declared:

The processes of genetic engineering and traditional breeding are different, and according to the technical experts
in the agency, they lead to different risks. [ix]

In light of the unique risks, those experts called for GE foods to undergo careful testing capable of detecting unexpected
side effects.

Moreover, the FDAs Biotechnology Coordinator acknowledged there was not a consensus about safety in the scientific
community at large. He also admitted that the allergenic potential of some GE foods is particularly difficult to predict. [x]
Nonetheless, in May 1992 the FDA claimed that:

The agency is not aware of any information showing that foods derived by these new methods differ from other
foods in any meaningful or uniform way. [xi]

It also asserted that there is overwhelming consensus among scientists that GE foods are so safe they dont
require any testing. Accordingly, the agency doesnt require a smidgen of testing and allows GE foods to enter the
market without any.

If the FDA had told the truth and disclosed the extensive concerns of its own experts, the subsequent history of the GE
venture would have surely been very different and might well have been quite short. At the least, any GE foods that did
reach market would have been subjected to much more rigorous testing than regulators anywhere have required.

The State of the Research and the Degree of Expert Consensus Have Been Misrepresented

Like the FDA, other GE proponents habitually claim theres an overwhelming expert consensus that GE foods are safe. And
the American Association for the Advancement of Science has declared that every respected organization that examined
the evidence has determined theyre no riskier than conventional ones.

But this is flat-out false. For instance, in 2001 the Royal Society of Canada issued a report concluding that:

A ) it is scientifically unjustifiable to presume that GE foods are safe.

 B) the default prediction for each should be that the genetic alteration has induced unintended and potentially
harmful side effects.[xii]

Moreover, the British Medical Association, the Public Health Association of Australia, and the editors of The Lancet (a
premier medical journal) have all expressed concerns about the risks;[xiii] and in 2015 a peer-reviewed journal published a
statement signed by more than 300 scientists asserting that there is not a consensus about the safety of GE foods and that
their safety has not been adequately demonstrated.[xiv]

GE proponents also falsely profess that the safety of GE foods has been thoroughly demonstrated when in reality many
well-conducted studies published in peer-reviewed journals have detected harm to the animals that ate GE food.

In fact, a systematic review of the toxicological studies on GE foods published in 2009 concluded that the results of most of
them indicate that the products:

May cause hepatic, pancreatic, renal, and reproductive effects and may alter hematological, biochemical, and
immunologic parameters the significance of which remains unknown. [xv]

It also noted that further studies were clearly needed.

Another review that encompassed the additional studies that had been published up until August 2010 also provided cause
for caution. It concluded that there was an equilibrium between the research groups;

Suggesting that GE crops are as safe as their non-GE counterparts and those raising still serious
concerns. [xvi]

Between 2008 and 2014 eight such research reviews were published, and although some interpreted the data in favor of GE
crops, as a whole, they provide no grounds for unequivocally proclaiming safety. As Sheldon Krimsky, a professor at Tufts
University, observed in a comprehensive examination that itself was published in a peer-reviewed journal:
 One cannot read these systematic reviews and conclude that the science on health effects of GMOs has been
resolved within the scientific community. [xvii]

Yet, GMO proponents routinely proclaim that it has been conclusively resolved and that safety is a certitude.

Two Compelling and Disturbing Conclusions

Thus, even from this brief summary, its clear that the GE food venture has been chronically dependent on twisting the truth;
and this dependence can be readily detected in virtually every statement thats been issued in support of its products.

A striking example is the guide to GE crops published by the UKs Royal Society in May 2016.[xviii] Although it professes to
provide accurate, science-based information, analysis reveals that its case for the safety of these crops is based on multiple
misrepresentations.[xix]

So if the worlds oldest and most respected scientific institution cannot argue for the safety of GE foods without
systematically distorting the facts, it indicates that such distortion is essential to the argument.

Moreover, when the multitude of distortions and deceptions that have been issued on behalf of these products over the last
thirty-five years are compiled and irrefutably documented (as in my book), the conclusion that the GE food venture could not
have survived without them becomes virtually inescapable.

And another conclusion is equally obvious. The incontestable fact that the evidence has been methodically misrepresented
is in itself compelling evidence of how strongly the aggregate evidence raises reasonable doubts about the safety of these
foods because if it was as favorable as the proponents claim, there would have been no need to distort it.

References
[i] Druker, Steven, Altered Genes, Twisted Truth: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted
Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public (Clear River Press 2015)

[ii] The agencys promotional policy was acknowledged in Genetically Engineered Foods, FDA Consumer, Jan.-Feb. 1993,
p.14.

[iii] The demonstrably false statements that have been issued in order to deflect suspicion from the GE process, as well as
other deceptive tactics that have been employed, are described in Chapter 3 of Altered Genes, Twisted Truth. That chapter
also comprehensively examines the evidence, including important evidence produced by researchers at the Mayo Clinic that
had not been previously made public.

[iv] Document #15, p. 3 at: http://biointegrity.org/24-fda-documents. NOTE: If the URL specified for this endnote (which is
also the URL for numbers 5 through 10) is temporarily inactive, the documents can be accessed
at: http://www.biointegrity.org/list.htm

[v] Document #16 at: http://biointegrity.org/24-fda-documents.

[vi] Document #4 at: http://biointegrity.org/24-fda-documents.

[vii] Document #2 at: http://biointegrity.org/24-fda-documents.

[viii] Document #10 at: http://biointegrity.org/24-fda-documents.

[ix] Document #1 at: http://biointegrity.org/24-fda-documents.

[x] Document #8 at: http://biointegrity.org/24-fda-documents.

[xi] Statement of Policy: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties, May 29, 1992, Federal Register vol. 57, No. 104 at
22991

[xii] Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada. The Royal Society of
Canada, January 2001. This report has never been withdrawn or revised.

[xiii] The British Medical Association has clearly expressed reservations about the safety of these novel products. As
described in the British Medical Journal, the Association released a 2004 report stating that:

More research is needed to show that genetically modified (GM) food crops and ingredients are safe for people
and the environment and that they offer real benefits over traditionally grown foods. (Kmietowicz, Z. GM Foods
Should Be Submitted to Further Studies, says BMA,

- British Medical Journal, 2004 March 13; 328(7440): 602)

The Public Health Association of Australia has likewise (and more recently) indicated its opinion that the safety of genetically
modified foods has not been adequately demonstrated. Its policy statement on genetically modified (GM) foods adopted in
2013 states:

Thorough, independent research into the effects of GM foods on agronomy, health, society, the environment and
the economy should be undertaken, and until this work is completed, all governments in Australia should impose
an immediate and indefinite freeze on: the growing of GM crops for commercial purposes; the importation of GM
foods and food components; and the patenting of genetic resources for food.

- www.phaa.net.au/documents/item/235

The Lancet criticized the presumption that genetically engineered foods entail no greater risks of unexpected effects than
conventional foods, stating that there are good reasons to believe that specific risks may exist and that governments
should never have allowed these products into the food chain without insisting on rigorous testing for effects on health. (The
Lancet, Vol. 353, Issue 9167, p. 1811, 29 May 1999.)

[xiv] Hilbeck et al. Environmental Sciences Europe (2015) 27:4. http://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/s12302-014-0034-

1.pdf

[xv] Dona, A., and I. S. Arvanitouannis. 2009. Health Risks of Genetically Modified Foods. Critical Reviews in Food
Science and Nutrition 49 (2): 164-75.

[xvi] Domingo, J. L., and J. G. Bordonaba. 2011. A Literature Review on the Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified
Plants. Environment International 37 (4): 734-42

[xvii] Krimsky, S., An Illusory Consensus Behind GMO Health Assessment, Science, Technology & Human
Values, November 2015; vol. 40, 6: pp. 883-914., first published on August 7, 2015.

[xviii] GM plants: Questions and answers. The Royal Society, May 2016.

[xix] For a documentation of the major misrepresentations, see my article published in The Ecologist: http://bit.ly/29NN8dk

Steven M. Druker is a public interest attorney and the executive director of the Alliance for Bio-Integrity. He is the author
of Altered Genes, Twisted Truth: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted
Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public, which was released in 2015 with a foreword by Jane Goodall hailing it
as without doubt one of the most important books of the last 50 years.

The Eradication Of Natural Alternatives: Big Pharma Wants To Eliminate The

Competition
August 25 2016 | From: Sott

Everyone has the simple desire to find happiness within themselves - to find a state of well-being
that can be carried throughout their lives. Sara is no different. Sara is a teacher who struggles with
mental conditions for which she has been prescribed a bevy of medications.

Over the years she has struggled, as most in her situation have, with addiction and the unbearable side-effects of
her FDA-approved "safe" medications.

Related: FDA wants to jail Amish man 48 years for selling herbal remedies people love

Her absolute passion in this life is for the children whom she molds and develops with an unrivaled dedication. As she
began to grapple further with the unexpected effects and growing addiction to her medications, she began to see it affecting
her ability to be present in her responsibilities, while also stealing her creativity that she so greatly treasured.

So when she discovered kratom, which successfully replaced not one, but all of her medications, with zero side-effects, she
thanked God for providing this miracle and natural alternative.

In a time when much of what Westerners thought they knew about themselves and their health has begun to prove
unfounded, the ever-present natural and homeopathic alternatives are once again gathering attention.

Due largely in part to the continual effort of the pharmaceutical industry, many are unaware that the majority of natural
alternatives to the overwhelming amount of different pharmaceutical medications are not only very effective, but in many
cases, a far better option.

To some this might seem a fantastical claim, yet that is exactly what people have been conditioned to think.
Big Pharma has been caught in kickback schemes, exposed for bribery, fraud, and price-fixing, and has made it quite clear
to the American people that their primary concern is not the health of the nation, but their own bottom line. Yet the
pharmaceutical giants march on, increasing their profit with every passing year.

To think that this or any other company would not attempt to stomp out competition that threatened to rival their products is
just nave. This is seen in business every day.

Yet people seem to cast Big Pharma in a light of righteousness, as if they are some benevolent caregiver providing
the country with loving healthcare; as if they are somehow exempt from the cutthroat nature of big business simply
because their efforts are incorrectly seen as a public service, even though Big Pharma is not concerned with
anything above and beyond its own profits.

What is being witnessed is an all-out assault on any possible natural alternative to Big Pharma medications; and currently in
their crosshairs, being heralded as a miracle drug, is the natural root extract kratom.

Just as the nation is witnessing with cannabis, the pharmaceutical industry is beginning to wage war against this natural
substance because it threatens to expose the simple fact that natural remedies actually work; and work well.
Kratom has shown to work wonders for pain relief, anxiety, insomnia, and much more. In addition to its list of uses, it has a
long and respected history; kratom has been used in Southeast Asia for centuries and is perfectly safe, especially when
compared to the obvious dangers known to exist with opiate use.

Opiates are an epidemic in this county, causing more 16,000 deaths a year, and according to the National Institute on Drug
Abuse, an estimated 36 million people abuse opioids worldwide, with an estimated 2.1 million Americans suffering from
opiate addiction.

The number of unintentional overdose deaths from prescription pain relievers has soared in the United States, more than
quadrupling since 1999.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that more Americans now die from painkillers than from heroin and
cocaine combined. This is due in large part to the industry's efforts to over-prescribe opiate based medications; and this is
not a hypothetical.

Many doctors have been arrested, charged, and shut down do to running what is called a "pill-mill," or a location where
doctors unanimously and haphazardly hand out prescriptions for opiate painkillers for a multitude of reasons, primarily and
most commonly, the pharmaceutical company's direct compensation for being one of their best salesmen.

Americans now consume more than 84 percent of the world's supply of oxycodone and almost 100 percent of
hydrocodone opioids.

These "painkillers," which most doctors will tell you do a poor job of living up to that title, are currently listed as a Schedule II
controlled substance.

Currently cannabis, the plant being shown to have more health benefits than all of Big Pharma's medications combined, is
listed as a Schedule I controlled substance, implying that the plant has zero medical value and is highly addictive - both of
which are categorically untrue.

To add insult to injury, the Federal government has a patent on the medical use of cannabis, all while arresting those who
use cannabis for its medical value. It's laughably absurd.
Related: Cancer Update: There Are Now 100 Scientific Studies That Prove Cannabis Cures Cancer + Watch What
Happens When Cannabis Is Injected Into Cancer Cells

To the resounding cheers of the American people, Big Pharma has been losing the battle to keep cannabis in the dark
shadowy recesses of the illegal drug world and out of the hands of those in desperate need of its healing properties.

That in itself is a perfect example of how the industry is not focused on the needs and desires of the people they claim to
help, but rather on telling them what they need and creating a situation in which that need becomes a reality; and their
profits soar at the expense of real cures as opposed to prolonged treatments.

As kratom continues to rise and its value begins to be clearly demonstrated, Big Pharma has now made it their
number one enemy.

It may seem illogical and unnecessary to label a natural root extract that has been used for thousands of years as
dangerous while this country's number one prescribed medication is killing people in the millions, yet that is exactly what's
happening.

In Alabama, Governor Robert J. Bentley signed a bill Tuesday that would make kratom a Schedule I controlled substance,
right alongside heroin, and amazingly, with the same penalties.

The stark contrast between painkillers and a natural substance such as kratom is painfully obvious.
It's clear that opiates are the real problem; so all should be asking themselves why law enforcement chooses to
focus on the natural substances alone: It always comes back to money.

There are billions of dollars in profit that the government stands to lose with the rise of natural substances such as cannabis,
kratom, or kava, on both a medical and an industrial level. This is why Americans are exposed to fast-tracked drugs with
countless known (as well as unknown) side-effects that fly through the FDA, only to be pulled years later due to terrible and
often terminal results.

This has almost become an accepted practice. Yet there are drugs with the potential to cure and not just treat that get
shelved at the FDA for decades, shrugged off as just the backlogged efforts of the FDA. They can only do so much, right?

The FDA just approved a new super-Vicodin type drug called Zohydro. This drug contains up to five times the amount of
hydrocodone and does not have time-release protection, so it can be easily crushed up and snorted or injected by those
who would abuse it.

This drug was approved after only one twelve-week trial in which five of the people involved died as a result.

Yet kratom, which has been used for centuries and is widely accepted as extremely safe, is dangerous and unlawful in the
eyes of the Feds.

When you talk to pain specialists in our field, they will all tell you one indisputable fact: opiates are lousy drugs to
treat chronic pain" said one FDA committee member who voted against Zohydro approval.

The hypocrisy within this country's medical field, as well as many others, has become something of an established
American business model. Lie long enough, with enough confidence and with enough force, and the Truth no
longer matters.

Recently the Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet released information showing how at least 50% of all scientific research today is
false.

This is becoming business as usual, and it is at the expense of the nation's health. They are bogging down drugs that can
cure while fast-tracking highly addictive treatments, producing the perfect return customer.

With Alabama's new law deeming kratom illegal and with other states soon to follow, Sara is left falling back into her old rut
of addiction and mental fog brought on by the prescribed "healthcare" that so often left her feeling lost in a world full of
potential.
So many fall victim to the pacification and addiction almost certain to rear its ugly head when being subjected to daily and
prolonged pharmaceutical drug use. Kratom was the one natural substance that gave her zero side-effects and completely
relieved her of her anxiety while rendering her other drugs unnecessary.

It is not hard to see why Big Pharma saw this substance as a threat to its ongoing domination of the drug trade in the United
States.

Related: What The Amish Can Teach Us About Modern Medicine

Is Your Multivitamin Toxic? + Is Your Multivitamin Supplement A Multi-Waste Of Your

Money?
August 23 2016 | From: GreenMedInfo / TheTruthAboutCancer

In episode #11 (season 2) of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, a woman poisons her husband with
the chemical sodium selenite. Strange as it may sound, this exotic murder weapon, and it's close
cousin, sodium selenate, are listed as "nutrients" on the labels of most mass-marketed vitamins.
Even though both sodium selenite and selenate are classified as dangerous and toxic to the environment by
regulatory bodies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the European Union, they are the
primary forms of this mineral - selenium - sold on the mass market today.

In fact, most mass-market vitamins contain chemicals that the EPA does not allow in our public drinking water at levels
above 50 parts per billion per liter. According to the EPA's Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) standards, the highest
allowable level of selenium in public drinking water is 50 parts per billion (equivalent to 50 micrograms per liter).

To get a sense of how small an allowable limit this is, 50 parts per billion is equivalent to a tablespoon of water in an
Olympic-size swimming pool.

How can vitamin manufacturers advertise something as being a "nutrient" when the EPA - out of concern for our health - has
barred it from our drinking water at all but exceedingly minute levels? Have sodium selenite/selenate really been shown to
be toxic?

A brief perusal of toxicology reports from the Hazardous Substances Databank (toxnet.nlm.nih.gov) and PUBMED
(pubmed.gov) shows that both forms can be carcinogenic and genotoxic and may contribute to reproductive and
developmental problems in animals and humans.

The question is not whether these minerals have toxicity, but rather at what level they overwhelm our capacity for their
detoxification and/or biotransformation into non-toxic metabolites?

A word should be said here about the differences that exist between inorganic minerals and biologically active
ones:

The selenium that is found in foods like brazil nuts, mustard seeds, and fresh produce grown in selenium-rich soil, is
infinitely different from unbound forms being put into some multivitamins. In fact, sodium selenite/selenate can cause DNA
damage associated with cancer and birth defects, whereas the selenium found within food, or laboratory chelated forms
like selenomethionine, has chemopreventive properties.

The basic principle that explains this difference is that when you isolate a nutrient or vitamin out of the food complex within
which it is naturally found, and where it is inseparably bound to thousands of known and unknown food factors (e.g.,
enzymes, lipids, protein chaperones, glyconutrients, etc.) it is no longer as beneficial to life and in some cases harmful to it.

This is especially true in the case of vertebrate mammals who are equipped to get their minerals from the plants they ingest
or through the biotransformation of inorganic minerals to organic ones by microflora in their gastrointestinal tracts.

The primary reason that sodium selenite/selenate are preferred by some vitamin manufacturers over safer, more beneficial
forms like chelated or yeast-grown selenium is because it is more profitable to use raw materials of lower quality.

"You get what you pay for" is a saying that almost always rings true for dietary supplements. Buying industrial waste
products, or chemicals that are considered hazardous waste, and repackaging them as "dietary supplements" can be
extremely profitable.
Indeed, this is not the first time in history that such a hoax has been perpetrated on the public. The FDA-approved use of
fluoride in our drinking water and the use of radioactive cobalt-60 culled from nuclear reactors for the irradiation of
conventional food illustrates how industrial waste products with known toxicity are eventually converted into commodities or
technologies "beneficial to health."

Whereas initially these substances have very high disposal costs for the industries that excrete them into our environment,
the liability is converted - through the right combination of lobbying, miseducation and "checkbook science" - back into a
commodity, with the environment and consumer suffering health and financial losses as a result.

Unfortunately, inorganic forms of selenium are not the only problem with mass-market vitamins.

Take the multivitamin Centrum, manufactured by Pfizer, the most powerful pharmaceutical companies in the world. This
vitamin contains the following chemicals:

Chemical: Amount Found in Centrum/ EPA Maximum Allowed Limit in 1 Liter of Drinking Water

Sodium selenite: 55 mcg 50 mcg

Nickelous sulfate: 5 mcg 100 mcg

Stannous chloride (tin): 10 mcg 4 mcg

Ferrous fumarate (iron): 18 mg 0.3 mg

Manganese sulfate: 2.3 mg 0.05 mg

 Cupric sulfate: 0.5 mg 1.3 mg

In the left hand column above you will see the quantities of inorganic minerals found within each dose of Centrum. In the
right hand column are the maximum quantity allowed by the EPA in one liter of drinking water.

In the case of stannous chloride (tin), ferrous fumarate (iron) and manganese sulfate there are significantly higher doses in
Centrum than are considered safe for human consumption in a liter of water.

Also, cupric sulfate is used as a herbicide, fungicide and pesticide!

Although the others listed are at levels well under the EPA's allowable limit, it is simply amazing that they are found in a
product for human consumption at any quantity given their known toxicity.

So, if these chemicals are toxic, how can they be marketed as beneficial to our health?

As of today no law forbids the use of these substances in dietary supplements, despite laboratory research demonstrating
their toxicity in animals, and epidemiological and occupational data demonstrating their actual or potential toxicity in
humans.

This is due to the widespread acceptance in the U.S. of a chemical and drug industry-friendly "weight of evidence" standard
for toxicological risk assessment.

Rather than using the "precautionary principle," which dictates that a substance that is suspected of being harmful should be
duly regulated in order to minimize the public's exposure, the "weight of evidence" paradigm requires that a panel of
government appointed experts must evaluate all available toxicological data, and must come up with a consensus that the
evidence, unequivocally, demonstrates the substance in question poses a serious health risk.

Until such an assessment can be made, a number of substances with obvious toxicity are "innocent until proven
guilty" and can be portrayed by irresponsible and/or uneducated manufacturers as being beneficial to human
health.
It is sad and ironic that at a time when smaller dietary supplement manufacturers are being accused of being "unregulated"
and having poor quality standards (even when they are incurring great costs by using vastly superior ingredients) that
massive pharmaceutical companies, who have every resource at their disposal, are allowed to market toxic chemicals to
consumers under the banner of USP (United States Pharmacopeia) or "pharmaceutical grade" quality, and get away with it.

Ultimately, we need to use common sense in our purchasing decisions and realize that sometimes companies will
intentionally mislead the public - with the complicity of regulatory bodies like the FDA - and will advertise a product that has
no health benefits; or worse, may actually detract from our health.

The fact that Centrum may or may not be "the #1 doctor multivitamin brand" is irrelevant, considering that one
does not ordinarily go to a doctor to seek wise counsel on nutrition. It is simply not their specialty.

The irony is that billions of dollars in health care cost - and the suffering these costs represent - could be saved
every year if people took the simple step of taking a good multivitamin every day.

It is advisable to look for product manufacturers that use high quality ingredients, including those from whole foods, as they
are easier for our bodies to absorb and to utilize and therefore contribute more significantly to filling the voids in our diet.

For a toxicological analysis of the ingredients of Centrum visit our product analysis page for Centrum. To view other
consumer advocacy expos pieces visit our Consumer Advocacy page.

Is Your Multivitamin Supplement A Multi-Waste Of Your Money?

When the average person makes the decision to add a nutritional supplement to their diet, a
multivitamin is likely to be the first choice. Thats because to most people it feels like taking out
insurance on their health.
In fact, multivitamin supplements are regularly used by one-third of all American adults and are the most common
dietary supplement consumed in the U.S. today. Traditionally, a daily multivitamin is meant to avoid nutritional
deficiency. The specific combination of vitamins and minerals is designed to resemble healthy dietary patterns,
especially that of regular fruit and vegetable consumption.

The only problem is many commercially available multivitamin supplements simply dont work. Thats because
theyre made up of isolated, synthetic compounds that are chemically and structurally different from the actual vitamin
complexes found in real foods.

But before we get into this, lets be clear as to what exactly vitamins are. By definition, they are organic substances that
originate mainly in plants and are essential in small amounts for our health, growth, reproduction, and maintenance.

Vitamins need to be a regular part of our diet since they either cannot be made at all or in sufficient quantities in
our bodies to do their job properly. Finally, each vitamin performs a specific function one vitamin cannot replace
another.
This is the problem most multivitamin supplements today contain chemicals that were never part of our natural diet, do not
originate in plants, and are unable to perform vitamin-like activities in our bodies.

All this has led some health experts to suggest that commercially available multivitamin supplements should actually be
labeled as non-food vitamin imitations.

Do You Really Need a Multivitamin Supplement?

If youre like the majority of people nowadays, youre buying your food ready-to-eat instead growing it yourself. This
increasing trend has led to the rise of a massive food industry, for which the health of the end-user is considered secondary
to profit margins.

Correspondingly, theres a growing school of thought that the poor nutritive quality of our food lies at the root of all of our
health problems today. The nutrition we should get, but dont, from our diet weakens our immune system and directly
impacts our health. This increases our susceptibility to infections and diseases including cancer.

The Scary Truth About Whats in Most Multivitamins

For decades the natural health industry has been talking up vitamin supplements as being essential for a healthy and
productive life. However, most commercially available vitamins today are far from being natural organic substances that
originate primarily in plants.

Instead, the frightening truth is most vitamins today are derived from petroleum extracts, coal tar derivatives,
chemically processed sugar, and industrially processed fish oils. Even worse, acids and industrial chemicals such as
formaldehyde are used to make them!
Not surprisingly, synthetic vitamins were originally developed because they were easier to mass produce and cost less.

As an aside, did you know that manufacturers of petroleum-derived supplements cynically call their products vegetarian
not because they are from plants, but because they are not from animals?

Also, some brands of synthetic vitamins are labeled organic because they contain carbon which by definition would
mean that all hydrocarbon petroleum derivatives should be organic. (That doesnt entice me to consume some fresh-from-
the-ground crude oil). The fact is, most so-called organic vitamins commercially available today are not really organic from
the true naturopathic, or even the U.S. governments perspective.

How Do Non-Food Vitamins Differ from Real Vitamins in Foods?

First of all, the physiochemical forms of many vitamins present naturally in foods are very different from their synthetically
prepared versions which are known as analogs.

For instance, vitamin A is present in foods as retinyl esters and mixed carotenoids while synthetic vitamin A analogs
include vitamin A acetate and palmitate, and isolated beta-carotene.
Similarly, the food forms of vitamin C include two variants of ascorbic acid, as well as their salts and other derivatives.
The synthetic analog of vitamin C is made up solely of isolated, crystalline ascorbic acid.

In other words, most commercial non-food vitamins are artificially prepared chemical substances obtained from
non-organic sources that are chemically and structurally different from the healthful vitamins present naturally in
foods.

This fundamental difference has many major consequences for the bioavailability and actions of food-sourced vitamins
relative to synthetic vitamins in your body. Bioavailability refers to the proportion of a nutritional supplement that enters your
bloodstream and is able to have a biological effect in your body and the physiochemical form of a nutrient is a major factor
in this.

Food-sourced vitamins are more easily absorbed and used by your body relative to their non-food, synthetic
analogues, for three main reasons:

1. Food-sourced vitamins exist in physiochemical forms which your body has evolved to recognize.

2. Particle size is an important factor in nutrient absorption, and food-derived vitamins appear to have smaller
particle sizes for better absorption.

3. So-called co-factors present in the same foods as food-sourced vitamins appear to boost their absorption
because of their interactions with each other.

In reality, food-sourced vitamins are biological complexes containing multiple components. Functional vitamin activity can
only happen when all the co-factors and components of the vitamin complex are present and working together
synergistically.
When isolated and separated into artificial chemical forms, these purified, crystalline synthetic compounds are no longer
actual vitamins. Indeed, published scientific research shows that food-derived vitamins are nutritionally superior
relative to their synthetic analogs.

Unfortunately, we have been brainwashed to believe that synthetic chemicals are superior to naturally occurring, food-
sourced vitamins and other nutrients. This false idea has been propagated mainly by the food, drug, and pharma industry,
whose sole overriding interest is to sell and profit from their inferior nutritional supplements.

Lets consider a couple of individual examples of food-sourced vitamins and their synthetic analogs

Food-Sourced Vitamin A vs. Synthetic Vitamin A

Vitamin A is the name of a group of fat-soluble compounds that include retinol, retinal, and retinyl esters. This vitamin helps
to manage immune function, vision, reproduction, and cellular communication. It also supports cell growth and
differentiation; and it plays a critical role in the normal formation and maintenance of the heart, lungs, kidneys, and other
organs.

Our diet contains two forms of vitamin A: preformed vitamin A (including retinol and its esterified form, retinyl ester) and
provitamin A carotenoids.

Preformed vitamin A is found in foods from animal sources, such as dairy products, fish, and meat (especially liver). By far
the most important provitamin A carotenoid is beta-carotene. This is a red-orange colored pigment found in plants and fruits,
especially carrots and leafy yellow and green vegetables.

Both preformed vitamin A and provitamin A carotenoids are converted within our bodies to retinal and retinoic acid, the
active forms of vitamin A that carry out many important biological functions.
The synthetic analog vitamin A acetate is made from methanol, while vitamin A palmitate is either made from fish oil or
synthetically derived. Synthetic beta-carotene is prepared by condensing aldehyde (made from acetone yes, the nail
polish remover) with acetylene.

Food-sourced beta-carotene is known to have high antioxidant ability. Antioxidants help to neutralize harmful free
radicals generated in our bodies by inflammation, pollution, UV exposure, and cigarette smoke. It also appears to be
safer for our health. One possible reason is because in natural foods it is attached to co-factors such as lipoproteins, which
may prevent toxicity.

On the other hand, synthetic beta-carotene has clearly been shown to be harmful for health if given alone to smokers, or to
individuals exposed to environmental carcinogens. It also acts against vitamin Es antioxidant ability to protect against LDL
oxidation, which is an early step in the formation of atherosclerosis and development of heart disease.

Food Complex Vitamin C vs. Synthetic Ascorbic Acid

Vitamin C is crucial for the growth and repair of the bodys tissues, making skin, tendons and blood vessels, helping wounds
heal faster, and keeping bones and teeth healthy.
Vitamin C is an essential dietary nutrient for us humans because we cannot make it in our bodies. It occurs naturally in two
forms, along with bioflavonoids as well as several related compounds with vitamin C-like activity. These forms include salts
of ascorbic acid as well as oxidized forms such as dehydroascorbic acid. Hence food-sourced vitamin C should rightfully be
called food complex vitamin C.

Food-derived vitamin C acts as an antioxidant, protecting against oxidative stress which happens when there is an
imbalance between the production of potentially harmful free radicals, relative to the bodys ability to detoxify them via
antioxidants.

Synthetic ascorbic acid, on the other hand, is made by fermenting corn sugar, with acetone (nail polish remover)
being used in the final step of its production. This synthetic form does not contain both forms that exist naturally. Neither
does it contain bioflavonoids and other co-factors, hence it is very different from food complex vitamin C.
Interestingly, food complex vitamin C has a negative redox potential while synthetic ascorbic acid has a positive redox
potential. Redox potential refers to a compounds ability to acquire electrons and thereby be reduced. Compounds with a
negative redox potential can counter oxidative stress, whereas those with a positive redox potential cannot.

A U.S. government study found that a food containing only 80 mg of vitamin C produced a greater increase in blood
antioxidant levels when compared to over 15 times as much isolated ascorbic acid. The presence of bioflavonoids and other
co-factors are believed to be responsible for this difference.

Many studies have shown that diets high in fruits and vegetables are associated with lower risk of cardiovascular disease,
stroke, and cancer, and with increased longevity.

On the other hand, while some beneficial effects of supplemental synthetic vitamin C have been observed in small studies,
large well-controlled studies dont show any change in markers of oxidation or any obvious health benefits.

[Although lives have been saved with high-dosage intravenous vitamin C treatment and with Liposomal
Encapsulated vitamin C treatment.]

Whats the Ideal Multivitamin Supplement?

Youve probably heard the old expression, You are what you eat. Im not sure who first said it, but this nugget of wisdom
has been expanded to Youre not what you eat, but what you digest, absorb, and assimilate.

Our bodies have been conditioned by many thousands of years of evolution to absorb and safely use vitamins in the natural
context of their co-factors. In other words, these vitamins are usually present as multi-component complexes, synergistically
interconnected with other nutrients and healthful elements present in natural [organic] foods.

Many people today consume mega-doses of isolated pharmaceutical-grade vitamins, which are synthesized, standardized,
isolated chemicals that are very rarely made from natural sources. As a result, many of these synthetic vitamin analogs are
unable to perform vitamin-like biological activities in our bodies and may even be toxic at higher levels.
Most commercially available multivitamin supplements are nothing more than a jumbled assembly of many ill-
fitting parts, an ineffective combination of metals and inorganic chemicals.

In fact, even if you take so-called natural vitamins that have been extracted and purified from natural foods, they will not be
as effective, since they have been separated from the other components of their functional complex and because the
necessary co-factors which assist in their functioning have been eliminated.

In summary, an ideal multivitamin supplement should contain the entire intact vitamin complex with all the co-factors and
essential trace minerals necessary for the given vitamin to function synergistically in our bodies in terms of its bioavailability,
efficacy, and safety.

Related: Are All Vitamins Safe?

How The Dairy Industry Tricked Humans Into Believing They Need Milk
August 21 2016 | From: TrueActivist

Despite the fact that one can get their daily recommendation of calcium, potassium, and protein
from fruits and vegetables, the dairy industry has spent billions of dollars to convince consumers
otherwise.

Got Milk? We sure hope not. Despite being a somewhat tasty addition to coffee, tea, and delectable treats, the
ingredient when pasteurized is highly toxic to the human body.

In fact, physicians such as Dr. Willet, who has conducted many studies and reviewed the research on the topic, believe milk
to be more of a detriment to the human body than an aid.

This is because despite popular belief, the food has never been shown to reduce fracture risk. In fact, according to
the Nurses Health Study, dairy may increase risk of fractures by 50%! This concerning finding is supported by the fact that
countries with lowest rates of dairy and calcium consumption (like those in Africa and Asia) have the lowest rates of
osteoporosis.
Considering that approximately 3/4 of the worlds population is unable to digest milk and other dairy products, it seems clear
the food is not an ideal substance for consumption.

However, the average consumer doesnt know this.

From celebrity endorsements to advertisements by the dairy industry, most have been taught to believe that dairy is an ideal
food for optimum health.

Because theres so much misinformation surrounding the subject, Vox recently created a video which illustrates the facade
of the dairy industry.

One of the points made is that despite the fact that consumers can get the daily recommendation of calcium, potassium, and
protein from [properly organic] fruits and vegetables, the dairy industry has spent billions of dollars to convince the populace
otherwise.

If you were taught that one must drink milk to grow up big and strong, youre not alone. However, now is the time to get
educated on the facts.
Because milk is very mucus-forming in the human body, it is believed to contribute to allergies, ear infections, Type 1
diabetes, anemia, and even constipation. In addition, the food may contribute to various types of cancers as consumption of
the product increases the bodys level of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1).

The good news is that there are plenty of tasty, creamy dairy alternatives that are not only easy-to-make, theyre affordable.

Milks from rice, almonds, cashew, hemp, and even coconut can be found in most grocery stores, and some companies
even sell dairy-free ice cream such as Ben & Jerrys! In fact, the non-dairy milk market has surged within the past few
years. Almond milk sales, in particular, have increased by 250 percent from 2000-2015 to almost $895 million. [Avoid Soy
milk as it is not good for you and often GMO].

Is it time to ditch dairy?

20 Practical Uses For Coca Cola - Proof That Coke Does Not Belong In The Human
Body & 22 Ways Drinking Soda Will Shorten Your Life + The Hidden Costs Of Soda
August 20 2016 | From: TrueActivist / GreenMedInfo

Numerous studies have shown the negative health effects of drinking soda on your waistline and
your teeth.
To prove Coke does not belong in the human body, here are 20 practical ways you can use Coke as a domestic
cleaner:

1. Removes grease stains from clothing and fabric.

2. Removes rust; using fabric dipped in Coke, a sponge or even aluminum foil. Also loosens rusty bolts.

3. Removes blood stains from clothing and fabric.

4. Cleans oil stains from a garage floor; let the stain soak, hose off.

5. Kills slugs and snails; the acids kills them.

6. Cleans burnt pans; let the pan soak in the Coke, then rinse.

7. Descales a kettle (same method as with burnt pans).

8. Cleans car battery terminals by pouring a small amount of Coke over each one.

9. Cleans your engine; Coke distributors have been using this technique for decades.

10. Makes pennies shine; soaking old pennies in Coke will remove the tarnish.
 11. Cleans tile grout; pour onto kitchen floor, leave for a few minutes, wipe up.

12. Dissolves a tooth; Use a sealed containertakes a while but it does work.

13. Removes gum from hair; dip into a small bowl of Coke, leave a few minutes. Gum will wipe off.

14. Removes stains from vitreous china.

15. Got a dirty pool? Adding two 2-liter bottles of Coke clears up rust.

16. You can remove (or fade) dye from hair by pouring diet Coke over it.

17. Remove marker stains from carpet. Applying, scrub and then clean with soapy water to remove marker stains.

18. Cleans a toilet; pour around bowl, leave for a while, flush clean.

19. Coke and aluminum foil will bring Chrome to a high shine.

20. Strips paint off metal furniture. Soak a towel in Coke and lay it on the paint surface.

Furthermore, have you ever wondered what exactly Coca Cola is?
 After 10 minutes: The sugar contained in a glass of Cola can cause a devastating strike on the body. The cause being
the phosphoric acid which inhibits the action of sugar.

After 20 minutes: A leap in insulin levels in bloodstream occurs.

After 40 minutes: Ingestion of caffeine is finally completed. The eyes pupils are expanding. Blood pressure rises because
the liver disposes more sugar into the bloodstream. The adenosine receptors become blocked thereby preventing
drowsiness.

After 45 minutes: The body raises production of the dopamine hormone, which stimulates the brain pleasure center.
Similar to the reaction Heroin creates.

After 1 hour: Phosphoric acid binds calcium, magnesium and zinc in the gastrointestinal tract, which supercharges
metabolism. The release of calcium through urine takes place.

After more than 1 hour: Diuretic effects of the drink enters in the game. The calcium, magnesium, and zinc are removed
out of the body, which are a part of our bones, as well as sodium. At this time, we can become irritable or subdued. The
whole quantity of water, contained in a coca cola, is removed through urination.

When having a cold bottle of Coke and enjoying its undeniable freshness are we aware of what chemical cocktail
we are putting into our bodies?

The active ingredient in Coca-Cola is orthophosphoric acid. Due to its high acidity, cisterns used for transporting the
chemical have to be equipped with special reservoirs designed for highly corrosive materials.

The Anatomy of Diet Coke / Coke Light

Lets have a look at the anatomy of one of the most advertised products of Coca-Cola Co. Coca-Cola Light
(Diet) without caffeine.
This drink contains Aqua Carbonated, E150D, E952, E951, E338, E330, Aromas, E211.

Aqua Carbonated this is sparkling water. It stirs gastric secretion, increases the acidity of the gastric juice and provokes
flatulency. Filtered tap water is what is primarily used.

E150D this is food coloring obtained through the processing of sugar at specified temperatures, with or without addition
of chemical reagents. In the case of coca-cola, ammonium sulfate is added.

E952 Sodium Cyclamate is a sugar substitute. Cyclamate is a synthetic chemical, has a sweet taste, which is 200 times
sweeter than sugar, and is used as an artificial sweetener. In 1969 it was banned by FDA, since it, as well as saccharin and
aspartame, caused cancer in rats.

E950 Acesulfame Potassium. 200 times sweeter than sugar, containing methyl-ether. It aggravates the operation of the
cardiovascular system. Likewise, it contains asparaginic acid which can also cause an excitant effect on our nervous system
and in time it can lead to addiction. Acesulfame is badly dissolved and is not recommended for use by children and pregnant
women.

E951 Aspartame. A sugar substitute for diabetics and is chemically unstable at elevated temperatures it breaks down
into methanol and phenylalanine. Methanol is very dangerous as only 5-10ml can cause destruction of the optic nerve and
irreversible blindness. In warm soft drinks, aspartame transforms into formaldehyde which is a very strong carcinogen.
Symptoms of aspartame poisoning include: unconsciousness, headaches, fatigue, dizziness, nausea, palpitation, weight
gain, irritability, anxiety, memory loss, blurry vision, fainting, joint pains, depression, infertility, hearing loss and more.
Aspartame can also provoke the following diseases: brain tumors, MS (Multiple Sclerosis), epilepsy, Graves disease,
chronic fatigue, Alzheimers, diabetes, mental deficiency and tuberculosis. Later, this substance was initially illegal due to its
dangers but was again made legal in a suspicious manner.

E338 Orthophosphoric Acid. This can cause irritation of the skin and eyes. It is used for production of phosphoric acid
salts of ammonia, sodium, calcium, aluminum and also in organic synthesis for the production of charcoal and film tapes. It
is also used in the production of refractory materials, ceramics, glass, fertilizers, synthetic detergents, medicine,
metalworking, as well as in the textile and oil industries. It is known that orthophosphoric acid interferes with the absorption
of calcium and iron into the body which can cause weakening of bones and osteoporosis. Other side effects are thirst and
skin rashes.

E330 Citric Acid. It is widely used in pharmaceutical and food industries. Salts of citric acid (citrates) are used in the food
industry as acids, preservatives, stabilizers, and in the medical fields for preserving blood.

Aromas unknown aromatic additives

E211 Sodium Benzoate. It is used in production of some food products for anti-bacterial and anti-fungal purposes. It is
often found in jams, fruit juices and fruit yogurts. Its not recommended for use by asthmatics and people who are sensitive
to aspirin. A study conducted by Peter Piper at the Sheffield University in Britain, found that this compound causes
significant damage to DNA. According to Peter, sodium benzoate which is an active component in preservatives, doesnt
destroy DNA, but deactivates it. This can lead to cirrhosis and degenerative diseases like Parkinsons disease.

Coca-Cola is undeniably a very useful product. The key is to use it for purposes that do not include drinking! Here
is a video about Coca-Cola:

22 Ways Drinking Soda Will Shorten Your Life

Numerous studies have shown the negative health effects of drinking soda on your waistline and
your teeth. Drinking soda however, has far more serious health risks than many of us may realize.

According to Euromonitor, the average person in the United States consumes more than 126 grams of sugar per
day. Thats equal to 25.2 teaspoons, or the equivalent of drinking a little over three 12 ounce colas.

Numerous studies have shown the negative health effects of drinking soda on your waistline and your teeth. Drinking
soda however, has far more health risks than many of us may realize. Regular consumption of sugary drinks is linked to
numerous health problems including diabetes, heart disease, asthma, COPD and obesity.

So what are the risks and how much soda is too much? Lets take a look:

1. Soda can cause a decline in kidney function. In an 11-year-long Harvard Medical School study, including 3,318
women, researchers found that diet cola is linked with a two-fold increased risk for kidney decline.

2. Soda increases diabetes risk. High levels of sugar in soda places a lot of stress on your pancreas, potentially leaving
it unable to keep up with the bodys need for insulin. Drinking one or two sugary drinks per day increases your risk for type 2
diabetes by 25%.

3. Soda cans are lined with BPA. Soda cans are coated with the endocrine disruptor bisphenol A (BPA), which has
been linked to everything from heart disease to obesity to reproductive problems.

4. Soda dehydrates you. Caffeine is a diuretic. Diuretics promote the production of urine, causing you to urinate more
frequently. When the bodys cells are dehydrated they have difficulty absorbing nutrients, and it also makes it more difficult
for the body to eliminate waste.

5. Caramel coloring in soda is linked to cancer. The artificial brown coloring in colas is a chemical process, it is not
made from caramelized sugar. It is made by reacting sugars with ammonia and sulfites under high pressure and
temperatures. These chemical reactions result in the formation of 2-methylimidazole (2-MI) and 4 methylimidazole (4-MI),
which in government-conducted studies caused lung, liver, or thyroid cancer or leukemia in laboratory mice and rats.
 6. Caramel coloring in soda is linked to vascular issues. Dr. Nehal N. Mehta, director of Inflammatory Risk Cardiology
at the University of Pennsylvania states that there is a link between vascular problems and caramel-containing products.

7. Soda is high in calories. A 20 ounce can of Coca Cola contains 17 teaspoons of sugar and 240 caloriesempty
calories devoid of any nutritional value. It would take the average adult over one hour of walking to burn off the 240 calories
in a 20-ounce soda.

8. Caffeine in soda blocks the absorption of magnesium. According to Carolyn Dean, M.D., N.D. Magnesium is
essential for more than 325 enzyme reactions in the body. Magnesium also plays a role in your body's detoxification
processes and therefore is important for minimizing damage from environmental chemicals, heavy metals, and other
toxins.

9. Soda increases obesity risk in children. Each additional soda or other sugary drink consumed per day increases the
likelihood of a child becoming obese by about 60%. Sugary drinks are connected to other health problems as well.

10. Soda increases heart disease in men. Each soda consumed per day increases the risk of heart disease by 20% in
men.

11. Acid in soda wears away dental enamel. Lab testing on soda acidity shows that the amount of acid in soda is
enough to wear away dental enamel. pH levels in soda can be as low as 2.5, as a frame of reference battery acid has a pH
of 1, water has a pH of 7.0.

12. Soda contains high amounts of sugar. The average 20-ounce can of Coca Cola has the equivalent of 17 teaspoons
of sugar, it's not hard to see that soda can be bad for your teeth and your overall health.

13. Soda contains artificial sweeteners. While many people opt for artificial sugar to lower caloric intake the tradeoff for
your health isnt so sweet. Artificial sugars are linked to numerous illness and diseases including cancer.

14. Soda depletes your mineral levels. Sodas that contain phosphoric acid removes much needed calcium from your
bones. After studying several thousand men and woman, researchers at Tufts University, found that women who drank 3
or more cola based sodas a day, had almost 4% lower bone mineral density in their hips, even though researchers
controlled their calcium and vitamin D intake.

15. Drinking soda changes your metabolism. Dr. Hans-Peter Kubis, the director of the Health Exercise and
Rehabilitation group at Bangor University in England, has found that drinking soda on a regular basis can actually change
the metabolism in the human body. Participants drank 140 grams of sugar every day for four weeks (thats less than two 20
ounce cans of Coke). The results: their metabolism changed after the four weeks, making it more difficult for them to burn fat
and lose weight.

16. Drinking more than one soda daily, increases your risk for heart disease and metabolic syndrome. According to
Ravi Dhingra, M.D., lead author of the study and an instructor in Medicine at Harvard Medical School states If you are
drinking one or more soft drinks a day, you may be increasing your risk of developing metabolic risk factors for heart
disease. The Framingham study included nearly 9,000 individuals, over a four year period. Researchers found that
individuals consuming one or more sodas a day had a 48 % increased risk of metabolic syndrome compared to those
consuming less than one soft drink daily.

17. Diet soda does not help you lose weight. A University of Texas Health Science Center study found that the more
diet sodas a person drank, the greater their risk of becoming overweight. Consuming two or more cans a day increased
waistlines by 500% greater than those who do not consume diet soda.

18. Diet sodas contain mold inhibitors. They go by the names sodium benzoate or potassium benzoate, and theyre
used in nearly all diet sodas.

These chemicals have the ability to cause severe damage to DNA in the mitochondria to the point that they totally
inactivate it - they knock it out altogether, Peter Piper, a professor of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology at the
University of Sheffield in the U.K., told a British newspaper.

The preservative has also been linked to hives, asthma, and other allergic conditions, according to the Center for Science in
the Public Interest.

Note: Some companies have phased out sodium benzoate. Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi have replaced it with another
preservative, potassium benzoate. Both sodium and potassium benzoate were classified by the Food Commission in the UK
as mild irritants to the skin, eyes, and mucous membranes.

19. Sodas containing ascorbic acid and potassium benzoate can form benzene, a known carcinogen. Benzene can
form in beverages and foods that contain both ascorbic acid and potassium benzoate. According to the FDA, when
benzoate is exposed to light and heat in the presence of vitamin C, it can be converted into benzene. According to the
American Cancer Society, benzene is considered a carcinogen

20. Daily sodas and other sugar sweetened drinks are linked to Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). The
2,634 individuals in the study completed a CT scan to measure the amount of fat in the liver. They saw a higher prevalence
of NAFLD among people who reported drinking more than one sugar-sweetened drink per day compared to people who
said they drank no sugar-sweetened beverages.

21. Some sodas contain flame retardant. Brominated vegetable oil (BVO) is added to many citrus based sodas and
sports drinks to prevent the drinks from separating. Whats the concern? BVO is patented by chemical companies as a
flame retardant. It is also banned in over 100 countries, but it is still used in the U.S. Learn more here.

22. Soda is linked to Asthma. A study done in South Australis of 16,907 participants aged 16 years and older, showed
high levels of soda consumption were positively associated with asthma and COPD.

The Hidden Costs of Soda

Just as lifestyle diseases like Type II Diabetes and obesity grow to epidemic proportions in the U.S., the average
American now consumes 20 oz of soda every day. For non-diet drinkers that means guzzling an extra 17 teaspoons
of sugar daily.
Cancer Update: There Are Now 100 Scientific Studies That Prove Cannabis Cures
Cancer + Watch What Happens When Cannabis Is Injected Into Cancer Cells
August 17 2016 | From: HigherPerspective / HealthNutNews

Cannabis is a Schedule I drug in the United States. That means the government has designated the
plant as having no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. No accepted medical use?
There are scores of studies that say differently.

Rick Simpson is a medical marijuana activist, and he has been on a crusade of healing. He considers Cannabis to
be the most medicinally active plant that humans can use on this planet.

Related: Medical Establishment Doesn't Like Baking Soda Cancer Treatment Because Its Too Effective And Too
Cheap

Marijuana has been shown in some cases to effectively treat numerous types of cancer, improve immunity, and fight anxiety
and pain.

Here's the full list of studies:

Cannabis kills tumor cells

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1576089

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20090845
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/616322

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14640910

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19480992

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15275820

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15638794

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16818650

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17952650

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20307616

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16616335

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16624285

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10700234

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17675107

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14617682

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17342320

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16893424

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15026328

Uterine, testicular, and pancreatic cancers

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/cannabis/healthprofessional/page4

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20925645

Brain cancer

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11479216

Mouth and throat cancer

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20516734

Breast cancer

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18454173

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16728591

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9653194

Lung cancer

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25069049

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22198381?dopt=Abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21097714?dopt=Abstract
 Prostate cancer

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12746841?dopt=Abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3339795/?tool=pubmed

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22594963

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15753356

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10570948

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19690545

Blood cancer

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12091357

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16908594

Skin cancer

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12511587

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19608284

Liver cancer

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475304

Cannabis cancer cures (general)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12514108

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15313899

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20053780

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18199524

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19589225

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12182964

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19442435

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12723496

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16250836

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17237277

Cancers of the head and neck

http://ww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2277494

Cholangiocarcinoma cancer

http://ww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19916793
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21115947

Leukemia

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15454482

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16139274

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14692532

Cannabis partially/fully induced cancer cell death

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12130702

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19457575

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18615640

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17931597

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18438336

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19916793

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18387516

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15453094

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19229996

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9771884

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18339876

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12133838

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16596790

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11269508

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15958274

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19425170

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17202146

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11903061

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15451022

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20336665

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19394652

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11106791

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19189659

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16500647

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19539619

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19059457

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16909207
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18088200

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10913156

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18354058

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19189054

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17934890

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16571653

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19889794

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15361550

Translocation-positive rhabdomyosarcoma

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19509271

Lymphoma

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18546271

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16936228

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16337199

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19609004

Cannabis kills cancer cells

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16818634

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12648025

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17952650

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16835997

Melanoma

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17065222

Thyroid carcinoma

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18197164

Colon cancer

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18938775

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19047095

Intestinal inflammation and cancer

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19442536
 Cannabinoids in health and disease

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18286801

Cannabis inhibits cancer cell invasion

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19914218

Watch What Happens When Cannabis Is Injected Into Cancer Cells

Since 1974 studies have shown that cannabis has anti-tumor effects.

The results of the 1974 study, reported in an Aug. 18, 1974, Washington Post newspaper feature, were that
cannabiss component,THC, slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in
laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent.

In 1975 an article in the Journal of the National cancer institute titled Antineoplastic Activity of Cannabinoids, they reported
that;

Lewis lung adenocarcinoma growth was retarded by the oral administration of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and
cannabinol (CBD). Mice treated for 20 consecutive days with THC and CBD had reduced primary tumor size.

In 1998, a research team at Madrids Complutense University Led by Dr. Manuel Guzman discovered that THC can
selectively induce programmed cell death in brain tumor cells without negatively impacting surrounding healthy cells.

They reported in the March 2002 issue of Nature Medicine they had destroyed incurable brain cancer tumors in rats by
injecting them with THC. And in 2007 even Harvard Researchers found that compounds in cannabis cut the growth of lung
cancer.

There is also an organization called The SETH Group that showed compounds in cannabis can stop the growth of human
glioblastoma multiforma (GBM) brain cancer cells. The SETH Group says:

No chemotherapy can match this nontoxic anti-cancer action.

Even in 2012 a pair of scientists at California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco found THC stops metastasis in many
kinds of aggressive cancer.

Watch as the active ingredient in marijuana, THC, kills cancer cells:

Related Articles:

Study Finds Homeopathic Medicine Extremely Helpful For Cancer Patients

Cancer Success Stories: "Alternative" Treatment

Every Cancer Has This Simple Component!

Business of cancer: People who refuse chemotherapy live over 12 years longer than those undergoing chemo
treatments

New Zealand Baby Food Contains 800 Times More Pesticides Than Baby Food In
Europe - But Pesticides To Stay In Baby Food
August 16 2016 | From: SafeFood
New Zealand baby food contained nearly 800 times more pesticides than baby food in Europe,
according to a recent analysis.

This evidence and why this is a risk to New Zealand babies was presented to the Primary
Production Committee by Dr Meriel Watts of the Pesticide Action Network Aotearoa and Alison
White of the Safe Food Campaign in December 2014

Related: Why Is Pesticide Used As An Ingredient In Infant Formula?

Their oral submissions are in support of a petition presented to parliament earlier this year calling for zero tolerance of
pesticides in baby food.

We want New Zealand to follow the European directives which basically stipulate a zero tolerance policy", stated
Ms White. "Three of the pesticides found in New Zealand baby food are hazardous for young children and babies
in the womb. Kiwi babies deserve the same level of protection as they have in the EU."

Analysis of a government study shows more than 30% of New Zealand baby food contained pesticide residues whereas
less than 1% (0.04%) of European baby food did so.
Five pesticides were detected in 32 baby food samples of the last NZ Total Diet Survey of 2009, which included testing of
formula, cereal based, custard/fruit and savoury weaning foods. The EU analysis of 2,062 baby foods showed residues in
only 0.04% of samples in 2010.

Some of the pesticides found are carcinogens and endocrine disruptors, for which no safe level has been
scientifically established, and doses thousands of times lower than those generally considered toxic are known to
interfere with normal human development," said Ms White.

"Children have unique windows of vulnerability which adults do not have", said Dr Watts.

"Extremely low doses which may not have an immediate effect on adults can critically interfere with children's
ongoing developmental processes. This may result in lifelong alterations in growth and development, organ
formation, as well as disease occurrence. One of the key outcomes of exposure to even tiny amounts of pesticides
like chlorpyrifos is lowered IQ and delayed development."

Dr Watts is senior scientist for the Pesticide Action Network Asia Pacific, and last year published a book Poisoning our
future: children and pesticides, in which she collates a substantial amount of research on why children are at risk from
pesticides, even from very low doses.

The Safe Food Campaign also thinks the government should do a more extensive analysis of baby food.

More extensive and regular surveys need to be done of baby food not only to monitor the proposed legislation but
also to provide a more adequate baseline for comparison over time and with other countries," said Ms White.
Pesticides To Stay In Baby Food

Pesticides are to stay in baby food, in spite of a petition presented to parliament. The Primary Production
Committee decided on May 28 2015 not to act on the Safe Food Campaign petition asking for zero tolerance for
pesticide residues in baby food, even though such directives are currently in place in the European Union.

The Committee acknowledged the public interest to New Zealanders and the concern felt about toxins in food, especially for
parents of new-borns and young children. However they did not call for a more extensive baby food residue surveillance
programme, as suggested by the Safe Food Campaign.

Every five to six years a mere eight samples of four different kinds of baby food are analysed for pesticide
residues," said Alison White, Co-convenor of the Safe Food Campaign, "and this is absolutely inadequate."

Pesticides were found in over 30% of baby food samples in the last Total Diet Survey in 2009. Ms White contrasted this to
the EU:

New Zealand baby food had 533% more pesticide residues. The EU had an average of less than 6% of baby food
samples positive for pesticide residues over 6 years."

"We want to make parents more aware of the dangers that certain pesticide residues pose to babies and young
children," Ms White stated.

"To this end, we are running a campaign the week of the 15 June to protect our children from toxic pesticides here
in New Zealand, following the pesticide awareness campaign of Pesticide Action Network Asia Pacific. More
details will be available on our website."
 "Certain pesticides, including some detected in New Zealand baby food, have been found to be linked to cancer
progression and endocrine or hormonal disruption," said Dr Heli Matilainen of the Safe Food Campaign.

"Children, due to their actively developing bodies, have unique windows of vulnerability which adults do not have.
This means that it is not the dose which is critical, but the timing of exposure, because doses thousands of times
lower than those normally considered toxic may interfere with children's development," explained Dr Matilainen.

"I am sure I am talking on behalf of every parent in New Zealand," concluded Ms White, "when I urge the
government to step up and protect our babies from dangerous pesticides that are currently present in
baby food."

The Safe Food Campaign is a nationwide organisation that gives consumers information about food so when they buy food
they can make a more informed choice.

Related: Chemical preservative in baby wipes found to cause eczema-like rashes

Wi-Fried? Australian Broadcasting Company: Catalyst

August 13 2016 | From: ForbiddenKnowledge

This documentary by Australia's ABC TV may change the way you look at your cell phone.

A scientific paper bravely published by a leading radiation biologist, Prof. Dariusz Leszczynski now allows top
neurologists, like Keith Black, MD of Los Angeles' Cedars-Sinai Hospital to issue warnings to their patients about
the dangers of cell phone use, which he describes as "Cooking the brain".

Related: The Gloves Come Off On EMF / Mobile / WiFi Radiation + Understanding The Dangers Of The 5G Rollout

The cell phone industry retaliated against Leszczynski by lobbying to have his funding stopped and in the meantime,
insurance companies in the US stopped coverage for health damages related to cell phone use.
Brain tumors associated with cell phone use has replaced leukemia as the number one child-killer. Men who store cell
phones in their pockets are assured lower sperm counts and there is a rash of young women contracting breast cancer, in
the very spot where they tuck their cellphones in their bras.

You can expect to receive the following measurable doses of radiation, using a standard radiation measuring device: 1)
Microwave oven: 800 microvolts, 2) WiFi Router: 800 microvolts, 3) Tablet PC: 2,000 microvolts (watching a movie), 4)
Smartphone: 40,000 microvolts (Samsung S3). This last device emits over a thousand times the normal background
radiation level of 30 microvolts.

Related: Australian Researcher: Phone Radiation Is A Hotline To Brain Cancer + Is Wi-Fi Making Your Child Ill?

The use of cell phones and other wireless technologies is being called the next 'casualty catastrophe,' after tobacco and
asbestos.

iPhones now all contain a legal disclaimer page with fine print, which cannot be enlarged and which is relatively difficult to
locate within the phone's navigation. It discloses the dangers of radiation exposure from cell phones and advises users to
keep the device at least 10mm from the body - but it's next to impossible to find on the device.

After conducting studies, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in Lyon, France has officially classified
the radio wave radiation emitted by cellphones and other household devices (to say nothing of SmartMeters - which is a
whole other video!) as a Class 2B Carcinogen (a possible cause of cancer).

At the same time, a US wireless lobbying group called the CTIA assures us that "Radio waves from cell phones are safe"
and studies paid for by the cell phone industry claim that, "Cell phone use causes no biological damage."

However, independent studies consistently report serious health effects, ranging from DNA damage, a 300% reduction in
sperm counts, 290% more brain tumors, autism and birth defects.
Related: Parents Of Boy With Tumour Want Wi-Fi Out Of School

Former senior White House adviser, Epidemiologist, Dr. Devra Davis, who appears in this film testified to the US Senate and
has given a hair-raising reports about the back-stories behind these contradictory scientific reports:

The independent scientists who reported on the ill effects of cell phones found themselves under attack by the cellphone
industry, who would attempt to get them fired and to get their funding taken away or else accuse them of fraud.

When that didn't work, they hired inexperienced scientists who didn't know anything about the subject to *look* like they
were replicating the incriminating experiments - and when all of the above didn't work, they wrote an internal memo, in which
they stated, "We war-gamed the science."

To prove a point, one scientist wrote a paper on the subject, laden with obvious errors, which was published in numerous
science journals and translated in over 15 countries.
Journalist, Anthony Gucciardi had previously proven how easy it is for industry to plant fake science in such publications in
the very similar case involving the drug Prozac, which was long ago proven to increase the incidence of suicide among
users and to cause violent behavior in the 1980s - but hidden from the public until 2005 until there was a BBC expos.

In response, the manufacturers hired their own scientists to prove how "great" Prozac was. However, producers of anti-
depressants today are forced to disclose these side effects, which one reads in their accompanying manuals or overhear, in
the blindingly-fast and unintelligible disclosure statements that run during television advertisements for these products.

People who know the details believe that once the public becomes aware of these dangerous side effects, the public outcry
will be worse than it was for cigarettes.
Related: Environmental Lawyer Talks About Wifi In Schools

Dr. Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News since 1981 says:

The system is broken, nobody has been told the truth. It's crazy."

He says that it's one thing for the tobacco industry to finally admit to the dangers of smoking tar and nicotine, after centuries
of being on the market because the science, which would eventually prove that cigarettes and secondhand smoke damaged
human health did not yet exist when tobacco was initially marketed - but cell phones were launched after preliminary
science was already available as to its inherent dangers and these products were released into the public without any safety
studies, whatsoever!

The point is to take action. Action is already being taken in Europe: In Italy, a landmark supreme court ruling found
a "causal link" between cell phone use and brain tumors.

In France, WiFi is being taken down and replaced with cabled Internet in schools and countries from Germany to Israel and
Finland are moving to stop cell phone sales to kids. In the UK, children under the age of 18, have been barred from cell
phone use for several years, already.

But of course, in the Good Ol' USA, the former chief lobbyist for the wireless industry, Thomas Wheeler was appointed by
President Barack Obama to head up the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which regulates the safety of
wireless devices, in yet another astonishing conflict-of-interest in the choice of appointed US Federal Regulators, who better
resemble wolves guarding the sheep than advocates for the health of the public at-large.
Wifi, Microwaves and the Consequences to our Health
Mr. Barrie Trower, a British physicist who was a microwave weapons expert and who worked for the Royal Navy
and the British Secret Service, talks about the health effects of WiFi and other forms of microwave radiation.

Mr. Trower came out of retirement because he was concerned that the microwave frequencies and intensities to which
children are exposed in schools are similar to those used for microwave weapons.

Bill Gates And George Soros Fund Monsanto And A World Depopulation Agenda
August 9 2016 | From: NaturalNews

Hitler had a depopulation agenda which he kept under wraps, until so many millions of people
disappeared that the world started figuring out what was happening.

What if he had come right out and announced his plan to create a master race and eliminate everyone else by
shooting them in the head with two bullets, starving them to death, or putting them in gas chambers?

Related: Indian Doctors Sue Bill Gates For Harming Children With Deadly 'Humanitarian' Vaccines + Dr. Robert
Rowen Reveals The Raw Truth About Vaccines At The Vaccine World Summit

How many people around the world would have supported him and said they liked the idea of getting rid of all the
"undesirables" and blaming them for all the world's problems?

Well, Bill Gates and George Soros are also all about depopulation, but there's no way they're going to come right out and
say it ... or has Bill already done so? What if you found out right now, by video, that Bill Gates, along with his partner in
crime, are planning on reducing the world's population by about 5 billion over the next decade, and that they plan on using
vaccines and genetically modified food to do so? Here it is.
Related: Top Scientist Resigns From His Post At The University Of California Admitting Global Warming Is A Big
Scam

United States citizens underestimate the devastating power of consuming pesticides daily. Sure, most Americans say they
want labels on GMOs, but they're not getting them anytime soon, so now what? Also, most Americans believe vaccines are
a good idea for combating infectious disease, and two out of every three people get a flu shot yearly, but do they know what
the typical ingredients are and what chronic damage they're really doing to their brains and nervous, immune and
reproductive systems?

Bill Gates and George Soros know. These two super rich white dudes are not trying to save poor people in Africa, or India or
Brazil.

They don't care at all about the health of underprivileged societies, but what they do care about is making sure these folks
can't reproduce, and that if they do reproduce, they are creating deformed, severely autistic, cancer-ridden beings that won't
reproduce or even lead productive lives, but rather cost their parents all of their earnings and savings just to care for them.

Bill Gates has spoken at a TED conference saying he can reduce the world population by billions using vaccines. How so? If
vaccines supposedly prevent infectious disease, how does that equate to killing off people or keeping them from
multiplying? Great question.

South African 'test and treat' mass HIV experimentation begins with funding from Bill Gates

As of 2016, it's approximated that 7 million people in South Africa have HIV, with over 300,000 new cases arising every
year. Of those, nearly 200,000 die each year from an AIDS related death, usually because their immune systems are next to
non-existent, so anything from a head cold to the flu could drive them into their graves.
What else could "kill off" these "undesirables?" Vaccines that contain known neurotoxins and heavy metal toxins. It's
called eugenics, and some tall white guys are running the show. "Trials" are underway, and Bill Gates, the ultimate
population control promoter and self-declared philanthropist, is pumping money into the pharma labs to concoct an AIDS
vaccine.

Zika hoax, Bill Gates' GM mosquitoes, mass media propaganda scare, followed by mass DNA
vaccination agenda

The CDC defines DNA vaccines as "purified plasmid preparations containing one or more DNA sequences capable of
inducing and/or promoting an immune response against a pathogen," yet there is no proof that this really works as stated,
and research shows that when these sequences are injected they can cause "insertional mutagenesis," which means gene
and cell mutations can result and that's also the definition of carcinogenesis, or "cancer."

Care to turn off your tumor suppressor genes? Bill Gates and George Soros would love it if you did. That could help reduce
the world population "problem" they are so righteously battling for us.

Could these novel sounding DNA vaccines actually create human tolerance to pathogens instead of immunity? Why would
billionaires who support and promote cancer-causing, pesticide-laden GM food support a vaccine that creates immunity? It
wouldn't make sense. That would be like breeding and releasing millions of poisonous snakes while creating and promoting
anti-venom inoculation.

Watch out for hoax vaccines that contain neurotoxins. Ask your naturopathic physician if the highly experimental, untested
and dangerous Zika, HIV, Ebola, Anthrax, HPV, Swine Flu, MMR and DNA vaccines are "right for you" and your children.

Something Very Strange Is Going On And Alternative News Readers Are Being
Targeted - Have You Noticed Any Of These Symptoms?
August 4 2016 | From: AllNewsPipeline

Three days ago a very interesting and disturbing series of comments were noted here at ANP,
unrelated to the actual article itself, but that in and of itself is not abnormal as debates progress
and lead into other areas of discussion.

But the originating question that started the side-topic and the responses, as well as how many of the comments
automatically went into moderation, pending approval before they could be seen when ANP does not moderate
comments before they post, all led me to the conclusion that there is something very strange going on.

Strange Symptoms

Note: Each comment shown will be linked to the comment itself because clicking over to the original comment only shows a
small fraction of the discussion that stemmed from it unless one goes to the article and scrolls to the end of the comments
and continues to reload until they hit that segment of the thread.

The original question was "Have a question for you all. Anybody else having trouble thinking? I have been
speaking English for many years, but just the last few days my vocabulary is having 'holes'. I am almost 45, we try
eating healthy, no fluoride or meds."

Another commentator, Dar, noted "Almost everyone I talk with as in friends, customers, etc have memory
problems. Not just elderly but all ages."

In response to the first question, Tyler stated "Actually, yes I have. Like a lot lately. I've had a really hard time
formulating thoughts over the last about 2 weeks, including things I know a lot about. And came out of nowhere
too. Even right now, my mind feels very like clouded."

Others mentioned dizzy spells, ringing in the ears during periods when it is more difficult to think, irritability,
multiple readers hearing a "low frequency pulsating sound," accompanied by vertigo, and other strange symptoms.

In the midst of the discussion, others were weighing in with possible causes, stress, cell phones and towers,
chemtrails, with one commentator noting specifically they had "two gwen towers" located close by.

Another reader detailed an experience from just days before:

Driving home after work down the freeway, it appeared that all vehicles I all lanes in front of me were...drunk. In the
same area, they all drifted across the right marker into other lanes. When I got to that area, it felt as if my mind was
zapped, strongly I might add, by what felt as microwaves.
 My brain instantly felt numb, swollen, back of my neck hurt...and I felt very strong vertigo and dizziness. Then I felt
like I was going to pass out while driving. I had to physically change my position, straighten up in my seat and
practically slap myself to maintain.

The rest of the trip home felt a little better, but I had something like hot flashes just wave through me (I'm not a
woman, so can't speak to exactly how those feel). Also strong ringing and "plugged" feeling in my right ear only.
When I got home, I explained what happened and was told that she didn't feel right all day as well...... Read the
rest here.

Another point of interest - In that same portion of the thread, the original poster noted that when trying to post her
comments she was being given the message that they were pending moderation.

When we noted that, we checked the moderation dashboard and sure enough, only comments related to that topic we
being listed as "pending" and not showing until we manually approved them.

Again, we do not moderate comments before they post and have a very limited "filter" set up to try to catch spammers and
nothing in those "pending" comments contained anything in our filters, nor any type of spam.

US Government Mind Control Experiements

Mockers and scoffers often see the words "mind control" and instantly tune out, thinking it is science fiction, so lets address
the documented fact that the U.S. Goverment, has experimented with mind control throughout the decades, dating back to
the 1950's with the CIA project MK ULTRA, supposedly halted in 1973, congressionals hearings were had in 1977 after an
FOIA request uncovered a cache of 20,000 documents relating to the U.S. Government project. In July 2001, more
information was declassified. - Source

Does anyone truly believe any government would spend two decades and untold amounts of money experimenting with
mind control and would simply stop, even though many tests were deemed successful?

We also know that scientists are now able to plant false experiences into the brain and have "discovered a way to implant
associations in people's brains, without the subjects being aware of it happening," and have the ability to erase painful
memories and add new ones.
The U.S. governments mind control experiments are a fact and it took over 20 years from the date they started for congress
to investigate and for the public to be told... makes one wonder what we learn 20 years from now as to what kind of
experiments the government is conducting on us right this very second.

GWEN (Ground Wave Emeregency Network)

Since one of the comments above did bring up the GWEN towers, we'll address that here. GWEN stands for Ground Wave
Emergency Network, which was a command and control communication system intended for use by the United States
government to facilitate military communications before, during and after a nuclear war.

Related: What Is This GWEN Tower Really For? + ELF, GWEN Towers, And HAARP Connection

Specifically, GWEN was constructed to survive the effects of a high-altitude nuclear explosion-generated electromagnetic
pulse (HEMP) to ensure that the United States President or his survivors could issue a launch order to strategic nuclear
bombers.

The network was conceived as an array of approximately 300 radio transceivers distributed across the continental USA
which operated in the Low frequency (LF) radio band. Later revised for 126 towers, plans again changed to include 56 radio
towers linking 38 terminals; it was later expanded to 96 towers linking 49 terminals. Final network towers numbered 58.
- Source

It is notable that "conspiracy theorists," often claimed the GWEN towers had "different functions, including controlling the
weather, mind, behavior and mood control of the populace."
Related: Monarch Mind Control & The MK-Ultra Program

I will remind readers that for decades those that believed the government was conducting mind control experiements on
citizens of the U.S. were also called "conspiracy theorists" as well, until MK ULTRA was revealed to the public, and some
deny still to this day what the project was and what the U.S. government did, despite the Senate hearings into the project
and the documentation released.

We also note that after so much funding being pumped into GWEN, that when it was "terminated," the US Coast Guard
began outfitting some GWEN sites to house their National Differential GPS system because "Existing equipment fit the
needs of the NDGPS".... in other words, the towers are still up all across the United States. There are currently 85 NDGPS
sites in the US network, administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Navigation Center, according to Wiki.

Electronic Harassment

Electronic Harassment, aka psychotronic torture, or electromagnetic torture, is also waved away as "conspiracy," of people
that believe the government uses electromagnetic radiation (such as the microwave auditory effect), radar, and surveillance
techniques to transmit sounds and thoughts into people's heads, affect people's bodies, and harass people.
It is widely know that the government does indeed use technology called "directed energy weapons," which emits highly
focused energy, transferring that energy to a target to damage it. The energy used includes: Electromagnetic radiation,
including radio frequency, microwave, lasers and masers; Particles with mass, in particle-beam weapons, and; Sound, in
sonic weapons.

In researching this article, I ran across an article which led me to a Washington Post article, dated January 2007, buried on
page W22, which reported on electronic harassment and voices in the head, and in the article we see that the Pentagon has
continued to pursue a weapon that can do just that.

But there are hints of ongoing research: An academic paper written for the Air Force in the mid-1990s mentions the idea of a
weapon that would use sound waves to send words into a person's head:

The signal can be a 'message from God' that can warn the enemy of impending doom, or encourage the enemy to
surrender," the author concluded.

In 2002, the Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a technology: using microwaves to send
words into someone's head.

That work is frequently cited on mind-control Web sites. Rich Garcia, a spokesman for the research laboratory's
directed energy directorate, declined to discuss that patent or current or related research in the field, citing the lab's
policy not to comment on its microwave work.

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed for this article, the Air Force released unclassified
documents surrounding that 2002 patent records that note that the patent was based on human experimentation
in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human
subjects, albeit with marginal intelligibility.

Research appeared to continue at least through 2002. Where this work has gone since is unclear the research
laboratory, citing classification, refused to discuss it or release other materials.

The official U.S. Air Force position is that there are no non-thermal effects of microwaves. Yet Dennis Bushnell,
chief scientist at NASA's Langley Research Center, tagged microwave attacks against the human brain as part of
future warfare in a 2001 presentation to the National Defense Industrial Association about "Future Strategic
Issues."

That work is exceedingly sensitive" and unlikely to be reported in any unclassified documents, he says.
Quoted portions above can be found on page 4 and page 5 of the online version of that WAPO 2007 article.

Related: How to Block Microwave Mind-Programming Signals

Bottom Line

The United States of America [and the rest of the West] has become a surveillance state, one very reminiscent to what was
described in George Orwell's classic dystopian novel "1984," where camera's track our every move, microphones are
hidden around cities to listen to conversations as part of a "clandestine government surveillance program," where the NSA
can turn on your phones remotely, and the FBI can force your IPHONE cameras on to secretly film.
Related: A look at some of the ways George Orwells 1984 has come true today

Knowing the type of technology the U.S. government is pursuing, what they have done in the past with mind control
experiments, the fact that they are continuing to research and create energy weapons, what stops them from turning those
weapons on the American people?

Is it a coincidence that the very people that read alternative news sites such as ANP, such as Christians, veterans,
constitutionalists, preppers, survivalists, etc... are the very same people that the Obama administration has labeled as
"extremists," and as "dangerous," and coincidentally are the very same people experiencing the symptoms described at the
top of this article?

If readers are experiencing strange symptoms, noting weird behaviors in those around you.... leave a comment describing
them, because there is definitely something strange going on.

Monsanto's Dirty Dozen: 12 More Crimes Against Humanity And The Environment
Concocted By The World's Most Evil Corporation
+ New Evidence About the Dangers of Monsantos Roundup
August 2 2016 | From: NaturalNews / TheIntercept

Most of the backlash today against Monsanto comes from the public's growing awareness about the
dangers of genetically-modified organisms (GMOs), Roundup (glyphosate), and the systemic
poisoning of our food supply with these unlabeled chemical additives.
But did you know that the world's most evil corporation actually got its start in the artificial sweetener business?

Related: The Complete History Of Monsanto, The Worlds Most Evil Corporation

The following 12 products we'll refer to these as Monsanto's Dirty Dozen are included among the other major crimes
against humanity besides GMOs that Monsanto has pumped out over the years for consumer use. Some of these products
will be familiar to you, but chances are you weren't aware of their Monsanto ties:

1) Saccharin (Sweet 'N Low).

Monsanto's founding was predicated on finding a way to mass produce saccharin, an artificial sugar substitute, for Coca-Cola.
With some regulatory arm-twisting, the chemical sweetener, which was shown back in the 1970s to cause cancer in test mice,
was a boon for Monsanto, despite its threat to human health, and helped propel the company towards other endeavors.

2) Aspartame (NutraSweet, Equal).

An accidental discovery that first emerged from research into chemical weaponry, aspartame, another artificial sugar
substitute, gained access to the Monsanto portfolio in 1985. Since then, Monsanto has profited to the tune of tens of billions of
dollars, the blood money from a genetically-engineered chemical that's been linked to neurological damage and cancer.

3) Glyphosate (Roundup).

Currently the world's most widely used herbicide, glyphosate is the result of Monsanto's aggressive entrance into the
agricultural sector following its sweetener successes. Monsanto's Roundup line of glyphosate products maintains a ubiquitous
presence in both the commercial and consumer markets, but these chemicals are linked to organ damage, tumors, infertility
and cancer.

4) Recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH).

Monsanto's obsession with genetic engineering hasn't been limited to just tweaking plants and sweeteners; the company is
also responsible for unleashing recombinant bovine growth hormone, or rBGH, a genetically-modified animal bulking chemical
that causes cows to produce more milk and grow faster. rBGH also causes serious infections, and has been linked to multiple
varieties of cancer in humans.

5) "Terminator" seeds.
When left in their natural form, plants produce an endless supply of new seeds from which humanity can grow new food for
"free" minus labor and other inputs.

But thanks to Monsanto, much of our processed food supply is now derived from so-called "terminator" seeds that only
survive one growing season before self-destructing, enriching the pockets of Monsanto executives at the expense of our
agricultural heritage.

6) Petroleum-based fertilizers.

Back in the old days, manure, compost and other organic materials served as natural fertilizer for growing food. Today, many
farmers apply synthetic, petroleum-based fertilizers produced by none other than Monsanto. Many of these fertilizers deplete
soil nutrients and microbes, producing "dead" foods deficient in vitamins and minerals foods that are making people
chronically ill at an alarming rate.

7) Agent orange.

Perhaps you're beginning to notice a pattern: Monsanto has mastered the art of producing destructive chemicals that harm
the environment and humans. And, if you're at all familiar with the history of Agent Orange, you'll also recognize that many of
today's consumer chemicals were previously wartime chemicals.
This chemical defoliant-slash-herbicide is what American soldiers sprayed across Vietnam during the Vietnam War, and
components of Agent Orange like 2,4-D are still used today in industrial agriculture.

Related: 92 children in Peru poisoned by Monsanto's Roundup after plane fumigates nearby field

8) Dioxins.

Speaking of Agent Orange, dioxins are another noxious byproduct of its manufacture. Dioxins are persistent environmental
pollutants present in all sorts of chemical compounds and solutions, and once they enter the body they accumulate in fatty
tissue, causing all sorts of chronic health issues over time.

9) DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane).

We're often told that the only way to effectively combat pests is to carpet-bomb them with chemicals like DDT, a mosquito
repellent of old that's been shown to damage hormones, interfere with reproduction and potentially cause cancer. DDT was
banned in the U.S. in 1970, despite years of propaganda from Monsanto claiming DDT was completely safe.

10) The atomic bomb and nuclear weapons.

During WWII, Monsanto acquired a chemical company that it incorporated into its "Central Research Department."
This department was responsible for coordinating the efforts of the Manhattan Project, which included the purification and
production of plutonium for nuclear weapons and the atomic bomb.

11) PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyl).

Another industrial experiment, PCBs were long used in coolant products for cars and electric motors that is, until toxicity
tests conducted some 50 years after their initial use showed serious harm to mammals. Liver disease, neurological disorders
and cancer are among the many consequences of PCB exposure.

12) Polystyrene (styrofoam).

Despite its immense environmental impact, polystyrene continues to be used in food packaging. Polystyrene contains the
toxic substances styrene and benzene, both of which are known neurotoxins and suspected carcinogens.
When exposed to hot liquids and foods, polystyrene leaches out these chemicals, which are directly absorbed into the
bloodstream and cell tissue.

New Evidence About the Dangers of Monsantos Roundup

John Sanders worked in the orange and grapefruit groves in Redlands, California, for more than 30
years. First as a ranch hand, then as a farm worker, he was responsible for keeping the weeds
around the citrus trees in check. Roundup, the Monsanto weed killer, was his weapon of choice, and
he sprayed it on the plants from a hand-held atomizer year-round.

Frank Tanner, who owned a landscaping business, is also a Californian and former Roundup user. Tanner relied on
the herbicide starting in 1974, and between 2000 and 2006 sprayed between 50 and 70 gallons of it a year, sometimes
from a backpack, other times from a 200-gallon drum that he rolled on a cart next to him.

Related: Monsanto and the Poisoning of Europe

The two men have other things in common, too: After being regularly exposed to Roundup, both developed non-Hodgkin
lymphoma, a blood cancer that starts in the lymph cells. And, as of April, both are plaintiffs in a suit filed against Monsanto
that marks a turning point in the pitched battle over the most widely used agricultural chemical in history.

Until recently, the fight over Roundup has mostly focused on its active ingredient, glyphosate.

But mounting evidence, including one study published in February, shows its not only glyphosate thats dangerous, but also
chemicals listed as inert ingredients in some formulations of Roundup and other glyphosate-based weed killers.

Though they have been in herbicides - and our environment - for decades, these chemicals have evaded scientific scrutiny
and regulation in large part because the companies that make and use them have concealed their identity as trade secrets.

Now, as environmental scientists have begun to puzzle out the mysterious chemicals sold along with glyphosate, evidence
that these so-called inert ingredients are harmful has begun to hit U.S. courts. In addition to Sanders and Tanner, at least four
people who developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma after using Roundup have sued Monsanto in recent months, citing the
dangers of both glyphosate and the co-formulants sold with it.

As Tanner and Sanderss complaint puts it: Monsanto:

Knew or should have known that Roundup is more toxic than glyphosate alone and that safety studies of
Roundup, Roundups adjuvants and inert ingredients were necessary.

Research on these chemicals seems to have played a role in the stark disagreement over glyphosates safety that has played
out on the international stage over the last year. In March 2015, using research on both glyphosate alone and the complete
formulations of Roundup and other herbicides, the World Health Organizations International Agency for Research on Cancer
(IARC) declared glyphosate a probable human carcinogen.
The IARC report noted an association between non-Hodgkin lymphoma and glyphosate, significant evidence that the
chemical caused cancer in lab animals, and strong evidence that it damaged human DNA.

Meanwhile, in November the European Food Safety Authority issued a report concluding that the active ingredient in
Roundup was unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans. The discrepancy might be explained by the fact that the
EFSA report included only studies looking at the effects of glyphosate alone.

Another reason the agencies may have differed, according to 94 environmental health experts from around the world, is that
IARC considered only independent studies, while the EFSA report included data from unpublished industry-submitted studies,
which were cited with redacted footnotes.

On Friday, April 29, the Environmental Protection Agency weighed in - briefly - when it posted a long-awaited report on the
reregistration of glyphosate concluding that the herbicide is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.

But the agency removed the report and 13 related documents from its website the following Monday, saying the publication
had been an error. The U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space and Technology is looking into the
EPAs apparent mishandling of the glyphosate report, and the EPA said it will release the reregistration materials by the end
of this year.

In response to queries from The Intercept, a spokesperson for the EPA wrote that the safety of all inert ingredients are
considered during the pesticide registration process, though an 87-page Cancer Assessment Document, which was among
the documents accidentally released, contains no references to research conducted on the co-formulants.
Naming the Toxins

Some European governments have already begun taking action against one of these co-formulants, a chemical
known as polyethoxylated tallowamine, or POEA, which is used in Monsantos Roundup Classic and Roundup
Original formulations, among other weed killers, to aid in penetrating the waxy surface of plants.

Related: Global Ban on Glyphosate Called for by Portuguese Medical Association President

Germany removed all herbicides containing POEA from the market in 2014, after a forestry worker who had been exposed to
it developed toxic inflammation of the lungs. In early April, the French national health and safety agency known as ANSES
took the first step toward banning products that combine glyphosate and POEA.

A draft of the European Commissions reregistration report on glyphosate proposed banning POEA. In April, the European
Parliament passed a non-binding resolution that supported the POEA ban and also suggested requiring member states to
compile a list of other co-formulants to be banned from herbicides. The European Commissions final vote on glyphosates
reregistration is expected later this month.
Related: Urine of very single member of the European Parliament tested found to be heavily contaminated with
glyphosate weed killer

In response to inquiries about POEA, Charla Marie Lord of Monsanto referred The Intercept to the companys April 8 blog
post, which noted that Monsanto has already been preparing for a gradual transition away from tallowamine to other types of
surfactants for commercial reasons. The post also said that tallowamine-based products do not pose an imminent risk for
human health when used according to instructions.

Independent scientists have been reporting since at least 1991 that pesticides containing glyphosate along with other
ingredients were more dangerous than glyphosate on its own. More recently, two papers - one published in 2002, the other in
2004 - showed that Roundup and other glyphosate-containing weed formulations were more likely to cause cell-cycle
dysregulation, a hallmark of cancer, than glyphosate alone.

In 2005, researchers showed that Roundup was more harmful to rats livers than its active ingredient by itself. And
a 2009 study showed that four formulations of Roundup were more toxic to human umbilical, embryonic, and placental cells
than glyphosate by itself.
But because manufacturers of weed killers are required to disclose only the chemical structures of their active ingredients -
and can hide the identity of the rest as confidential business information - for many years no one knew exactly what other
chemicals were in these products, let alone how they affected health.

Escaping Regulation

In 2012, Robin Mesnage decided to change that. A cellular and molecular toxicologist in London, Mesnage bought
nine herbicides containing glyphosate, including five different formulations of Roundup, and reverse engineered
some of the other components.

After studying the chemicals patterns using mass spectrometry, Mesnage and his colleagues came up with a list of possible
molecular structures and then compared them with available chemical samples.

It took around one year and three people (a specialist in pesticide toxicology, a specialist of chemical mixtures,
and a specialist in mass spectrometry) to unravel the secrets of Monsantos Roundup formulations, Mesnage
explained in an email.

The hard work paid off. In 2013, his team was able not only to deduce the chemical structure of additives in six of the nine
formulations but also to show that each of these supposedly inert ingredients was more toxic than glyphosate alone.
 That breakthrough helped scientists know exactly which
chemicals to study, though obtaining samples remains
challenging.

"It took around one year and three people (a

specialist in pesticide toxicology, a specialist of
chemical mixtures, and a specialist in mass
spectrometry) to unravel the secrets of Monsantos
Roundup formulations, Mesnage explained in an
email.

We still cant get them to make experiments, said

Nicolas Defarge, a molecular biologist based in
Paris.

Manufacturers of co-formulants are unwilling tosell

you anything if you are not a pesticide manufacturer,
and even less if you are a scientist willing to assess
their toxicity.

So when Defarge, Mesnage, and five other scientists

embarked on their most recent research, they had to be
creative. They were able to buy six weed killers, including
Roundup WeatherMax and Roundup Classic, at the store.
But, finding pure samples of the co-formulants in them was
trickier.

The scientists got one from a farmer who mixes his own
herbicide. For another, they went to a company that uses the
chemical to make soap.
The multi-Academy Award nominated 2007 film "Michael
Clayton" revolves around a lawyer for a large law firm
working on a multi-billion dollar class action law suit for a
giant agricultural chemical company that he knows is guilty.
"They were of course not aware that I was going to
Unorth has a logo with some very similar design emelents assess it for toxic and endocrine-disrupting
to those of the Monsanto logo. effects, said Defarge.

Andrs Szkcs, one of Defarges co-authors who is based

in Hungary, provided samples of the other three co-
formulants studied, but didnt respond to inquiries about how
he obtained them.

In February, the team published its findings, which showed

that each of the five co-formulants affected the function of
both the mitochondria in human placental cells and
aromatase, an enzyme that affects sexual development.

Not only did these chemicals, which arent named on

herbicide labels, affect biological functions, they did so at
levels far below the concentrations used in commercially
available products.
In fact, POEA - officially an inert ingredient - was between 1,200 and 2,000 times more toxic to cells than glyphosate,
officially the active ingredient.

The paper highlights the folly of letting co-formulants fly under the regulatory radar. Although the general public is never
exposed to pure glyphosate, government agencies set safe exposure levels for the declared active ingredient in Roundup and
other herbicides without considering POEA or any of the other chemicals that are bottled with it.

Take a look at this fictional advertisement for "Unorth" from the film Michael Clayton and tell us it doesn't look like a
Monsanto advertisement. If you take the time to watch Michael Clayton it's pretty clear that the movie is a dig at big
biotech.

Related: GMO and Toxic Chemicals: Monsanto Is Feeding the World

In February, the Food and Drug Administration announced plans to monitor food for glyphosate residue. But the agency has
no plan to test food for POEA or other additives, according to FDA press officer Lauren Sucher. And the EPA hasnt focused
squarely on POEA because it isnt officially an active ingredient.

Evidence of Toxicity

But the EPA has possessed evidence of POEAs toxicity for years, including several reports of substantial risk to
human health and the environment. One, submitted in 1998, noted that 1,000 fish died after 60 gallons of a mixture of
chemicals including POEA spilled into a ditch, according to the company responsible for the spill, whose name is
redacted in the document.

Related: Group of Nebraska Farmers Files Lawsuit Against Monsanto Claiming RoundUp Gave Them All Cancer

Another report, filed by the chemical company BASF in 2013, noted that several rats that inhaled POEA in an experiment
died. Researchers exposed rats to four different levels of the chemical, and at each level, at least some animals were killed.
Even at the lowest level, 4 out of 10 rats died.

The EPA has also reviewed the long-term environmental effects of POEA, including its impact on frogs. In 2008, the
agency reviewed the effects of both POEA-containing Roundup formulations and POEA itself on fish and amphibians,
and showed that Roundup Original, which has 15 percent POEA, is moderately toxic to wood frogs and that POEA itself is
highly toxic to rainbow trout.

As evidence of the harms of co-formulants has been building, the U.S. has increased the amount of glyphosate to which it is
theoretically safe to be exposed, which has in turn also increased our actual exposure to the chemicals it is packaged with.
Almost 300 million pounds of glyphosate was used on crops in the U.S. in 2013, up from approximately 16 million pounds in
1992, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

For the lawyers litigating the cases against Monsanto, the idea that POEA and the other ingredients contribute to the toxicity
of Roundup is critical.
 Thats one of the central theories of our case, said David Wool, an attorney at Andrus Wagstaff, who is working
on suits against Monsanto on behalf of four people who developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma after years of regularly
using Roundup.

Its not only that glyphosate is carcinogenic and dangerous, said Wool. Monsanto had every reason to know that,
by including POEA, it increased the danger of all of these products.

Robin Greenwald, the Weitz & Luxenberg attorney who filed Sanders and Tanners case, is confident that discovery, which
will begin over the next few months, will show that Monsanto intentionally mislabeled dangerous co-formulants.

My assumption is that we will find documents in their files that show they had ample evidence that the surfactants
were not inert and that they too had the potential to cause illness in people, said Greenwald.

But for her client, John Sanders, who is now in remission after undergoing chemotherapy, it doesnt really matter which
chemical did what. When he was using Roundup, Sanders had no idea that anything in the liquid that sometimes dripped on
his clothes and skin might cause cancer. That was never in my wildest dreams, he said recently. Now Sanders, who is 67,
dreams about staying healthy. He is due for a CT scan next month to see if his cancer has returned.

When asked to comment on the lawsuits, Monsanto provided the following statement:
 While we have sympathy for the plaintiffs, the science simply does not support the claims made in these lawsuits.

The U.S. EPA and other pesticide regulators around the world have reviewed numerous long-term carcinogenicity
studies and agree that there is no evidence that glyphosate causes cancer, even at very high doses.

Surfactants such as tallowamines are soapy substances that help to reduce surface tension of the water and are
found in many everyday products such as toothpaste, deodorant, shampoo, detergent and many other cleaning
products.

Tallowamine-based products do not pose an imminent risk for human health when used according to instructions.
In a 2009 review of toxicological data on tallowamine, the U.S. EPA found no evidence that tallowamines are
neurotoxic, mutagenic or clastogenic."

Related Articles:

Putin Closes The Door To Monsanto

Canadian govt. accused of covering up adverse effects of glyphosate after firing top health official researching
Monsanto herbicide

Nebraska farmers diagnosed with cancer are suing Monsanto over glyphosate

Glyphosate weed killer unleashes grotesque chemical deformations in farm animals... two-headed calves, pigs
born with no skin, twisted life forms seem spawned from Hell

Claim That New Zealand Uses Safe Vaccines - A Sick Joke

August 1 2016 | From: GANZ

A recent statement by Dr. Nicky Turner that New Zealand uses only safe vaccines is surely a
sick joke! Considering the number of young women who have either died or become very ill
following HPV vaccinations, Dr. Turner claim that New Zealand uses safe vaccines doesnt stand
up to close examination.
I can only assume that Dr. Turners idea of a safe vaccine is very different from that of the average parent or even
a normal person. Most parents expect vaccines to protect their childrens health, not to cause serious illness or
even possibly death.

Related: Pharmacist Speaks Out: Get Off Prescription Drugs, Avoid Vaccines

An increasing number of scientific studies have linked HPV vaccines with serious adverse effects and provide a scientific
explanation why some previously healthy HPV vaccine recipients have died unexpectedly after receiving the shot.

Dr. Nicky Turner made the highly dubious claim that NZ uses safe vaccines that make a dramatic difference to childrens
lives when she was responding to comments about measles and MMR vaccination made by Katherine Smith from No
Forced Vaccines on Radio NZs Morning Report on May 17.

Dr Turner is frequently interviewed about vaccines as a spokeswoman for the Immunisation Advisory Centre, an
organisation that receives funding from both the Ministry of Health and pharmaceutical companies that distribute vaccines in
New Zealand.

Listen to Katherine Smith's interview here.

The Radio New Zealand interviewer herself deserves a brick bat, in my opinion. The audible intakes of breath here and
there were indicative of a self-imposed censorship on what Katherine Smith was attempting to get across. Totally
unprofessional!
I have to ask myself whether she had in fact down any research on the topic prior to having Katherine on air! I highly doubt
it, otherwise she may well have been able to pose thought-provoking questions that could actually take the discussion
somewhere! Perhaps she might like to take the time to read the actual Lancet paper By Dr Andrew Wakefield!

Read the Lancet paper here.

Under the Bill of Rights, you are required by law to receive informed consent prior to vaccination. That means your health
practitioner MUST provide disclosure of risk vs benefits. No one has the right to make that decision for you or to coerce
you!

The information in the Medsafe data sheet ought to read by everyone. Don't rely on the handouts that are sent out through
schools or lay in bundles in the doctor's waiting rooms ... if your doctor won't give you the full product data insert, just
Google it!
New Zealand families that have been adversely affected by HPV vaccines are planning rallies as part of a global protest
about the continuing promotion of HPV vaccines as safe by the pharmaceutical industry and some doctors, despite the
mounting toll of serious adverse reactions and deaths following HPV vaccinations.

Educate yourself, educate your children ... stop being led like lambs to the slaughter, and stop listening to those who would
no longer have a high paying job and a significant media presence (denied to those fighting vaccines in all forms!) if
vaccines were official disputed for what they truly are!

Related Articles:
Vaccination: How Dare You Cripple, Maim And Murder The Minds Of Our Children!

Silent Epidemic - The Untold Story of Vaccines

The Spanish Influenza Epidemic Of 1918 Was Caused By Vaccinations

Gestapo In The USA: FCC Intimidates Press And Kills Free Speech At 5G Rollout
August 1 2016 | From: TakeBackYourPower

In a public meeting at FCC headquarters on July 14, the agency which once served the people
instead acted like tyrannical thugs, in an escalating series of remarkable events.
First, they prevented wireless science advocates from displaying a simple sign, violating their First Amendment
rights in a public venue. Then, a security guard forcefully prevented a t-shirt from being taken out of a bag, by a
former Congressional candidate with opposing views [See the full video at the end of this article, or links to the
relevant clips from the images below].

Related: First Study On 4G / LTE Cell Phone Radiation Shows It Affects Brain Activity

Next, a Bloomberg reporter had his credentials confiscated - almost unbelievably - for merely talking with the former
Congressional candidate.

Following these incidents, the reporter, Todd Shields, was visibly irate with FCC Commissioner Tom Wheeler - who also
happens to be the former president of CTIA, the wireless industrys lobbying organization.

Moments ago I was attempting to talk to to some people who came to attend the meeting and have concerns
about radiation and 5G. And your security force intervened - told the guy he couldnt show me the t-shirt he wished
to display at the meeting, forced him to put it away, and confiscated my FCC-issued ID. Is this consonant with the
discussion that ought to be taking place here, and whats your reaction to this action by your staff?

-Todd Shields, Bloomberg reporter, to FCC Chair Wheeler [on video above]
Bloomberg reporter Todd Shields had his credentials confiscated - for talking with a former Congressional candidate about 5G and health concerns

And in the Q&A that followed, the former Congressional candidate Kevin Mottus successfully added another dose of truth
the narrative.

Hey Tom, with the NTP study showing wireless causes cancer sub-thermally, how can you proceed with more
wireless expansion, with FCC standards only recognizing thermal effects - ignoring thousands of studies showing
cancerous effects, neurological effects, reproductive harm, immune system disorders people are being
electrosensitive

-Kevin Mottus, former Congressional candidate, to Wheeler [on video above]

After about 20 seconds of yielding the floor to Mottus, Wheeler interrupted, dodged this very appropriate question, and
diverted to an FCC-compliant journalist:

Lydia, do you have a question?]

(Which, on the video, almost sounds like a Wheeler Freudian slip: Litigate. Do you have a question?)
There have been thousands of published peer-reviewed studies that indicate the proliferation of microwave (wireless)
technologies is not safe to biological life. (See meta-study links here, here, here and here.)

Why is the FCC resorting to Gestapo-like tactics of suppression and outright intimidation?

The issue here, is that the Federal Communications Commission just rubber-stamped their rollout of 5G cellular
technology, which while increasing throughput, would blanket all planetary life with ultra-high microwave frequencies -
24Ghz and up. The fact that these frequencies have never been tested as safe is not stopping corporate-government plans
for an unleashing of massive infrastructure.

But there have been thousands of published peer-reviewed studies that indicate the proliferation of microwave (wireless)
technologies is not safe to biological life. (See meta-study links here, here, here and here.)

So, because theres a lot of money in a wireless economy and the data-harvesting that comes with it - trillions, in fact - Big
Industry has bought the science, bought lawmakers, ruled the proliferation of microwaves as safe, and infiltrated
the FCC along with most international health agencies.

And in the face of this willful, for-profit negligence, instead of employing conscience and responsibility, theyre actively
silencing all opposition. You know, those of the human species that pay attention to pass concepts like science and
reason.

Heres some snippets from FCC Chair Wheeler, at his June 20 press conference:

5G will use much higher frequency bands [24 to 100+ GHz] antennas that can aim and amplify signals
massive deployment of small cells tens of billions of dollars in economic activity hundreds of billions of
microchips if something can be connected, it will be connected unlike other countries we wont wait for
the standards

Tom Wheeler, FCC Chair [on video above]

Paraphrased: We cant let life get in the way of profit. We want to make billions from all of you, and control everything. And
in doing so, were not only going to willfully ignore science, were going to remove the idea of standards and initiate a
free-for-all.
FCC Chair and former industry lobbyist Tom Wheeler announces proliferation of 5G microwave technology, privatizes rollout and removes oversight
and standards. Nobody quits the CTIA. Once youre CTIA, youre family for life.

If unchecked, what could this lead to?

The implications of all of this are very far-reaching. How far? Well, to find out, lets start with what we know.

Its pretty clear at this point that we have a government that has been taken over by corporate interests. In order to increase
their power and control even more, they plan to exponentially ramp-up the deployment of technology everywhere, which a
vast body of science clearly says is harmful.

If unchecked, this will almost certainly lead to an increase in cancer and other ailments associated with exposure to
electromagnetic radiation. Havent we had enough of for-profit agendas putting profits before health?

From a surveillance standpoint, we already know there is a sinister spying agenda operating behind the scenes. The rollout
of 5G technology - especially in the standardless, profit-centered way Wheeler describes would indeed open up a
considerable new threat to basic rights.

If everything is connected, you can bet that as many details as possible about our actions will be tracked and stored
somewhere - like the $2B NSA facility in Blufdale, Utah. And there is extraordinary market value in this. A director at NARUC
stated that the value of data harvested just by smart utility meters will likely be worth a lot more than electricity itself, which
is a $2.2 trillion market globally.
Related: US Intelligence Chief: We Might Use The Internet Of Things To Spy On You

But besides being creepy and making the 1% even richer, there are clear warning signs that a control-oriented governing
system could easily take an indexed catalog of all of your actions and use it against you in a multitude of ways.

For example, increasingly-instrusive pre-crime operations are already planned in Miami. And insurance providers
are checking their customers facebook data to influence premiums and even coverage availability. So its really not
unreasonable to see how a governing body concerned primarily with staying in power, could restrict rights or remove
privileges for behavior that is deemed to be not aligned with national interests.

So, tracking is not ok unless we are absolutely convinced that the governing body of that system truly respects individual
rights and has the best interests of the people in mind. And right now, we are not even close to having such leadership in
our governments.

Wheelers vision of 5G would significantly enable those who are motivated by power and money to use technology to rule
over everyone else. In order to protect our lives and future, we must not allow that to happen.

While we would all like to have fast internet, we must now look closely at the downside of this technology, and take
constructive action. This can understandably be difficult, due to the considerable attachment that we have to both our
devices and the sense of immediate gratification that we obtain from using them.
While solutions to out planets problems are being actively prevented, steering human culture into a virtual/augmented reality seems to be the insane
game of the technocrats. Perhaps The Matrix was not far off, after all

How we will save our world: Individual responsibility, accountability and liability

In addition to an interview with Kevin Mottus, last Sunday I skyped with Dafna Tachover, an Israel-based attorney who was
present at G-Day, last Thursday.

Tachover, who is among millions now who have directly experienced microwave radiation harm after becoming sensitized to
it, says that the only way forward is individual accountability and liability. In my view, she is obviously right.

Dafna Tachover is the CEO of We Are The Evidence, an organization which advocates for the rights of those who has
been injured by wireless technology:

Until theres personal accountability and liability, this systematic problem that repeats itself will happen again, and
again, and again, and it has been. So, we learned that the tobacco industry was lying to the public, bluntly - to the
public, to the government, to health organizations - without any hesitation. Was anyone sued? No. Was anyone
found personally accountable? No. So thats actually what enables this kind of behavior to happen again and
again.

This is the action we should take: we should make it clear to those government people - or you know, if we talk
about wi-fi in schools, the school principals, who do have personal responsibility and liability to protect childrens
health - to make sure they know they will be found personally liable for the harms they cause. They have a position
of trust, and they betrayed that trust. And they should be found liable. It should be civil liability and criminal liability.

- Dafna Tachover, attorney [on this video link]

Former Congressional candidate Kevin Mottus spoke about the urgency of the situation.
Kevin Mottus is meeting with reps on the ground in Washington DC, Sept 6 Oct 6. To meet up with him there, reach him
at truthaction@protonmail.ch.

My background is as a medical social worker. And when I was in the hospitals I saw young salesman and lawyers
coming in with brain tumors, and healthy otherwise, other than the tumor - and doctors asking them about their cell
phone use. So I was clued in very early with these heavy users and the tumors it was causing.

Schools are now our most dangerous places to be. You have 20-40 wireless transmitters in their iPads and
wireless laptops, and then you have 2-3 commercial-grade wireless routers. So you have, really, the setting of
the most significant exposure in our country, and the most vulnerable population being exposed are small children
- which we know are 3 to 4 times as sensitive to all environmental hazards.

We are microwaving our population and wondering why our cancer is going through the roof and chronic disease
is going through the roof. Its really very sad.

I spoke to Congressman Grayson from Florida, and while I was talking with him, one of his staffers, Joe, came up
to me. And he said, What are you talking about? I said, Im talking about wireless cell phones causing brain
tumors. He said, Thats interesting, because I had a brain aneurysm and Im lucky to be alive. Its also interesting
because my buddy just died from a brain tumor.

So, people are definitely getting sick. And you need to ask them, Does your face tingle when you use your cell
phone?. Do you have difficulty sleeping? Have you ever gotten nauseous using the phone? Do you feel funny
when youre around wi-fi, or getting close to it? And youll be surprised - people are getting sick.

For instance, I spoke to Congressman Rush. Congressman Rush has a salivary gland tumor, which Israel has
associated with cell phone use.

We need to stop this before they [FCC] auction the [ultra-high frequency] spectrum.

-Kevin Mottus, former Congressional candidate, California [on this video link]

If you are reading this from the United States you can find links about actions you can take within your country at the end of
the original article at TakeBackYourPower.
Full Video:

IMPORTANT:

The new 5G system they plan on introducing following trials in 2017, described in your info and in the video, are
planned to operate between 28GHz 100GHz is interestingly the SAME FREQUENCY in the Extremely High
Frequency (EHF) (30GHz 300GHz or, wavelengths 10mm 1mm) spectrum that are already being used in the
ACTIVE DENIAL SYSTEM (ADS) non-lethal, directed energy weapon developed by the US military produced by
Raytheon designed for perimeter security and crowd control.

It was also used in Afghanistan War. The US Police use it already, and in 2010 the Los Angeles Sheriffs
Department announced that they were going to use reduced versions of it in detention centers to break up
prisoner fights etc.

See details on the Wiipedia entry here.

From Prof Olle Johansson interview on the Alzheimer's and Dementia Summit

"If you go back to [EMF] impact on brain function, you have all the pieces that you would look for, in for instance
Alzheimers and dementia. There are studies regarding loss of concentration capacity, loss of short term memory,
impacts on cellular function, including cell death in various rodent models leakage of the so-called blood-brain
barrier, connected also to damage and cell death of nerve cells. behavioral impacts impact on sleep quality
various forms of learning tasks."

"The [blood-brain barrier] effect was seen after a short exposure, namely a 1-minute mobile phone call and also
at an exposure level that was five thousand times below the official guideline...."

"This is the largest full-scale experiment with mankind, ever, on this planet."

Related: The Gloves Come Off On EMF / Mobile / WiFi Radiation + Understanding The Dangers Of The 5G Rollout

Dangerous Molecules Detected In E-Cigarettes Which May Make Them More Harmful
Than The Real Thing
July 29 2016 | From: PreventDisease

Penn State College of Medicine researchers have found that electronic cigarettes produce highly-
reactive free radicals - molecules associated with cell damage and cancer - and may pose a health
risk comparable or worse than conventional cigarettes.
The use of e-cigarettes is on the rise but research into the effects of e-cigarettes lags behind their popularity.

The number of teens and tweens using these products doubled between 2011 and 2012. According to the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, more than 20 percent of young adults have tried e-cigarettes, and current smokers and
recent former smokers are most likely to have used them.

E-cigarettes deliver nicotine in water vapor instead of by burning tobacco. The battery-operated devices have been
marketed as an alternative to traditional cigarettes. They look like the real thing. The end glows as you inhale. As you
exhale, you puff out a cloud of what looks like smoke.

But we know very little about the toxic substances produced by e-cigarettes and their health effects. More evidence coming
forward may ultimately validate that e-cigarettes may be more dangerous than regular cigarettes, potentially causing cancer
at comparable and possible faster rates depending on the chemicals used.

E-cigarettes have triggered a fierce debate among health experts who share the same goal -- reducing the disease and
death caused by tobacco. However, many now claim they are not so safe after all.
 Theres a perception that e-cigarettes are healthier than regular cigarettes, or at least not as harmful as regular
cigarettes, said John P. Richie Jr., professor of public health sciences and pharmacology.

While e-cigarette vapor does not contain many of the toxic substances that are known to be present in cigarette
smoke, its still important for us to figure out and to minimize the potential dangers that are associated with e-
cigarettes.

Previous studies have found low levels of aldehydes, chemical compounds that can cause oxidative stress and cell damage,
in e-cigarette smoke. But until now, no one has looked for free radicals, the main source of oxidative stress from cigarette
smoke. Highly reactive free radicals are a leading culprit in smoking-related cancer, cardiovascular disease and chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease.

Instead of smoke, e-cigarettes produce aerosols, tiny liquid particles suspended in a puff of air. The researchers measured
free radicals in e-cigarette aerosols.

They found that e-cigarettes produce high levels of highly reactive free radicals that fall in the range of 1,000- to 100-times
less than levels in regular cigarettes. Nanotechnology is also being implemeted to produced some of the chemicals involved
in their manufacturing.

This is the first study that demonstrates the fact that we have these highly reactive agents in e-cigarette
aerosols, Richie said. Results were published in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology.

The levels of radicals that were seeing are more than what you might get from a heavily air-polluted area but less
than what you might find in cigarette smoke, Richie said.

The radicals are produced when the devices heating coil heats the nicotine solution to very high temperatures.
Further research is needed to determine the health effects of highly reactive free radicals from e-cigarettes.

This is the first step, Richie said. The identification of these radicals in the aerosols means that we cant just say
e-cigarettes are safe because they dont contain tobacco. They are potentially harmful. Now we have to find out
what the harmful effects are.

Richie is currently conducting studies to carefully measure total numbers of free radicals in e-cigarette aerosols
and to identify their chemical structures.

That will help us interpret the data better to know how dangerous they are, he said.

Some experts are comparing replacing tobacco with e-cigarettes to heroin users switching to the painkiller methadone. The
replacement may have its own risks, but is it safer, probably not.

Related: The Dangers of Nanotechnology

New Study: 528Hz Sound "Miraculously" Cleaned Oil Polluted Water In The Gulf Of
Mexico
July 28 2016 | From: 528Records

A series of sounds played to oil polluted water from the Gulf of Mexico has miraculously cleared
test samples of the deadly petrochemicals, says a well known Canadian researcher.
According to John Hutchinson, an electro-magnetic energy expert from Vancouver, B.C., Canada, a selection of
music has helped purify poisoned water.

The frequencies included the sound of Jupiter, recently recorded by NASA, vibrating close to 528Hz frequency.

That sound energy has been determined to match the color greenish-yellow--the heart of the rainbow, the electromagnetic
color spectrum, celebrated by the botanical world, according to Dr. Leonard Horowitz, who has published most on that pure
tone. Nature obviously celebrates that shade, the pigment chlorophyll, to produce oxygen and energy needed for life.
According to Dr. Horowitz, Hutchinsons study results are most promising, as they were certified by the Analytical Chemical
Testing Laboratory, Inc. of Mobile, Alabama, and are consistent with studies and predictions based on the most advanced
discoveries in mathematics, physics, and biophysics.

528Hz frequency, the Miracle note of original Solfeggio musical scale, is only one of nine core creative frequencies in a
Perfect Circle of Sound that animates physical reality, like atomic energy technology, using spinning electrons vibrating
with electro-resonance.

This is an image of one of the most perfect, detailed, pure water crystals ever photographed. It formed to reflect the sound of
the sun.
In 2009, researcher David Sereda sent Dr. Horowitz NASA recordings of the sun along with this crystallograph produced by
researchers in Russia. Later, Dr. Horowitz compared the sound of the sun, and jupiter to the pure tones of The Perfect
Circle of Sound frequencies, including 528Hz. The Harvard trained public health expert noted 528Hz was most obviously
harmonic to both recordings.

Dr. Horowitz believes 528Hz is also fundamental to LOVEthe Universal Healer; and he recommends combining the
frequency of LOVE/528, with the Universal Solvent - Water - to advance the future of medicine - LOVE Hydrosonics.

To this end, the award winning author and film-maker publishes two online journals Hydrosonics, that discusses the
powerful impacts of sounds on water, and Medical Veritas, heralding advances in natural ways to end pollution and advance
healing.

John Hutchison, is a well known scientist best known for examining The Bermuda Triangle, and explaining strange
occurrences in this infamous area of the Atlantic ocean, called the Hutchison-Effect, all associated with electromagnetic
disturbances of unknown origin. The Canadian Government has persecuted Hutchinson heavily over the years, the last time
for supposedly causing his neighbor to levitate without consent.
Hutchinsons partner, Nancy Lazaryan, a journalist from Minnesota, said their research was intuited to include the 528Hz
sound that they observed causing oxygen to bubble up heavily from the bottom of the oil soaked Gulf and Perdido Bay,
between Florida and Alabama.

The couple started their research requesting samples of polluted Gulf water be sent to Hutchison's lab in Vancouver. There,
Hutchison and Lazaryan experimented using ancient Solfeggio sounds and Gregorian chant frequences that have been
traditionally used for healing. The frequencies were applied to several polluted water samples using audio and radio waves,
with wonderful results.

So Hutchison and Lazaryan packed up their lab equipment, borrowed a trailer, and farm truck, and traveled from Canada to
the Gulf. Their chemical analysis from their first "open air frequencies" experiments in Perdido Bay proved to them that, the
Gulf water can be healed.
To date, the federal government has relied on the deadly oil dispersant, Corexit, a Goldman Sach/Boots & Coots chemical
causing a lot of people, and wildlife, to get sick and die.

Alternatively, Hutchinson and Lazaryan recommend a harmonic "stream of sound" to completely purify the polluted water.
The couple claims the inspiration for these harmonics came from the Essenes, a sect of Israel where Jesus was a member.
The Essenes "inner circle" taught the "stream of sound" as part of the Creators power to create.

The 528 hz tone is known by the ancients to be a "healing frequency," and many people believe it can be used to repair
damaged DNA. Most recently, Dr. Horowitz, working with mathematician Marko Rodin, advanced the mathematical
relationship to genetic structuring, as DNA segments reflect Rodins infinity pattern, that others predict will revolutionize
everything. (click here for a Youtube presentation on this knowledge.)

In 2009, Dr. Horowitz produced Live H2O: Concert for the Living Water, in which groups from 72 countries participated by
singing and chanting in 528Hz, praying for all polluted water to be blessed worldwide.

One of the honorees at LIVE H2O was Dr. Masaru Emoto who conducted years of research sending purifying intentions and
LOVE/528Hz frequency vibrations into water with astonishing results published in dozens of languages and two New York
Times bestselling books.
Dr. Emoto actually filmed the molecular structure of the water changing from disorganized arrays of crystals in polluted
water, into beautiful snowflake formations included visible messages as through the water was actually conscious.

Dr. Horowitz, among Dr. Emotos leading scientific supporters, explains this metaphysically by relating the power of LOVE in
human hearts to the power of the Creator to respond to prayer and heart-felt loving intentions to heal the world and be
helpful to one another.

Hutchison and Lazaryan, likewise, are hoping to bless the planet with their new discoveries in the Gulf of Mexico.

"We declare PEACE," says Lazaryan, "the war upon the Gulf is over."

A Generation Of Poisoning With Gender-Bender Chemicals Has Created A New Class

Of Youth Who Fail To Recognize Gender At All
July 27 2016 | From: NaturalNews

The success of the globalists in perverting the minds of Western youth is evident in a new study
by the Innovation Group, which found that most people between the ages of 13 and 20 what the
mainstream media and social engineers have dubbed "Generation Z" no longer believe in
strictly-defined gender identities like "male" and "female."
These gender "binaries," which are really just the pronouns humanity has been using since the beginning of time
to differentiate between individuals with external reproductive equipment versus internal reproductive equipment,
are now "old-fashioned" to the youth of today, which the study found are more comfortable than previous
generations using gender-neutral (and grammatically incorrect) pronouns like "they" and "them" to describe a
single, genderless individual.

A majority of Gen-Z respondents, 52 percent, indicated that they aren't completely heterosexual, while 35 percent an 11
percent increase compared to "Millennials" admit that they fall somewhere along the spectrum of bisexuality. This
spectrum identification for sexuality is further reflected in the more than 38 percent of Gen-Zers who claim they don't believe
gender defines a person.

As far as the types of clothes and accessories they buy, 1320 year-olds are much more fluid when it comes to sticking to a
gender norm. Only 44 percent of Gen-Zers buy clothes exclusively designed for their own gender, while an astounding 70
percent say they support the idea that bathrooms become "genderless," welcoming anyone and everyone who wants to use
them.
Gen-Z is likewise more accepting of others who don't identify by any specific gender pronoun, or who identify by "non-
traditional" gender pronouns like "ze;" 74 percent of Gen-Zers fall into this category compared to just 62 percent of older
Millennials between the ages of 2134. But the one thing on which both Gen-Zers and Millennials agree? More people than
ever are experimenting with their gender identity.

A 16-year-old pansexual (genderless) student from Nebraska by the name of "Madeleine" told VICE that "it" (for lack of a
better pronoun) learned more about gender and identity from its peers than from older people, and that "agender," or no
gender at all, is a young people's phenomenon.

"I also notice that people my age are more open to gender and sexuality being fluid and subject to change," Madeleine
told VICE. "For a while, I identified as asexual, but as time went on and I changed, I realized that maybe I wasn't that way
anymore."

Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals are Eliminating Sex, Gender

This lack of clarity about biological identity is a product of two things: relentless media propaganda and chemical poisoning
with gender-bending chemicals found in plastics, herbicides and pesticides sprayed on our food, and environmental
pollution. Chemicals like bisphenol-A (BPA), glyphosate, soy and other hormone-disruptors are altering human genes and
producing next-generation "robot" humans with no gender, and thus no identity.
It's sad, really, because it could have been prevented through reforms that protect the people rather than the chemical and
drug industries that produce these toxins. Food, water, air: It's all tainted with endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) that,
more often than not, mimic the effects of estrogen, meaning they deplete testosterone and create hormone imbalances that
not only confuse children, but also affect their growth and development.

Young girls are becoming more "masculine," while young boys are becoming more "feminine" an alchemy of the two
sexes both physically and mentally that's changing the landscape of culture and civilization.

We've identified many sources of EDCs through our ongoing work at the Natural News Forensics Food Lab, which I
encourage you to check out in order to learn more.

Peace Foundation Project To Get Peer Mediation In Every School In NZ

July 26 2016 | From: NewZealandPeaceFoundation

The Peace Foundation is the operating name of the Foundation for Peace Studies Aotearoa / New
Zealand Inc. - Te Tuapapa Rongomau o Aotearoa.The Peace Foundation is a not for profit
organisation working to build peaceful relationships among people of all ages and cultures, from
personal to global through education, research and action.
The director of Platoon, Wallstreet and JFK was at Comic-Con 2016 in San Diego to discuss his new
movie Snowden. Considering the topic of the movie, the panel were discussing the NSA, online privacy and
government surveillance.

Are you able to make a pledge to our initiative?

And could you let your network know about this too? Every small bit helps, and adding your name to that of Louisa Wall MP,
Mayor Celia Wade Brown and Jeanette Fitzsimons helps to encourage others to follow your lead.

The work we do is the kind of educational training that a progressive Government should finance given it contributes to
peaceful communities, whanau and schools, something that reaches into the very soul of Aotearoa New Zealand, does it
not?

What else can we do to realise our target and help reduce crime, violence and aggression around our country?

With 24 days to go we have raised just over $24,000 with pledges made just recently. We won't get a cent of it if we don't
raise $150,000 by14 August.

Our desirable goal is to raise $300,000 so that we can get peer mediation into a further 160 schools around the country and
develop a project to get it to every single school, realising the peaceful Aotearoa NZ that drives you and me and so many
others.
Latest update - With 23 days to go, 50 generous donors have pledged $24,399.50 And we have just received some
FANTASTIC news!!! If we can raise further pledges of $125,603.50, a private donor has offered to TOP THIS UP WITH A
PLEDGE OF $150,030 to reach our big goal of $300,033!

Which means we can roll out our peer mediation trainings to a further 160 schools AND develop a project with partners to
reach every single school in New Zealand.

Please continue to share this initiative to your network, and ask your friends, your neighbours, the fellow passenger in the
bus, or next to you in an Auckland traffic jam (or wherever you are in New Zealand or the world) to make a pledge for
peace!

Why Does New Zealand Still Fluoridate? TV Commercial From FFNZ

July 25 2016 | From: VinnyEastwood

Why Does NZ Still Fluoridate?

TV Commercial FFNZ

Five Astonishing Facts That Will Make You Want To Stop Using Plastic Containers For
Good
July 24 2016 | From: NaturalNews

There are plenty of good reasons to stop using plastic containers, ranging from health and
environmental concerns, to simple practicality in the kitchen.
Considering the facts, there's really no good reason to continue buying products packed or bottled in plastic, or to
use plastic containers for food storage at home except when there are no other options available.

The founder Sharon Tennison has focused on making people-people connections including the business community, Rotary
clubs, etc..This delegation was organized because of concern about escalating international tensions and the danger of a
drift toward world threatening military conflict.

We were in Russia in late June as they were commemorating the 75th anniversary of the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union.

Here are the top five facts regarding plastic versus glass:

Fact #1: The environmental impact of plastic is enormous Enough plastic is discarded each year to circle the Earth four
times, and the average American throws away nearly 200 pounds of plastic each year. Billions of pounds of plastic are
polluting our oceans and threatening marine life, killing 1 million sea birds and 100,000 marine animals annually. Fifty
percent of plastic containers are used once and then thrown away.

Fact #2: Plastics are a threat to human health Chemicals leached from plastic containers enter our bodies and can lead
to serious health issues. Many of the substances used to make plastic are carcinogens, while others cause hormonal
imbalances, birth defects and developmental problems. Plastics often contain lead, cadmium and mercury, which can be
absorbed by the food or drinks they are used to contain and subsequently end up in our bodies.
Fact #3: Glass is better for the environment Glass containers can be used many times and can be recycled to make
new containers. Plastic containers are "down-cycled" instead. In other words, when you throw away a plastic bottle it will be
turned into other products (if it manages to get recycled at all). Every time you buy a plastic water bottle, it is made from
"new" plastic.

Fact #4: Glass is more practical in the kitchen One of the best things about glass containers is that they can be used
for storage, cooking and serving. The same glass food container can be used from the refrigerator to the oven to the dining
table. Glass containers can be used over and over again, and can be repurposed for other uses. If you buy a glass bottle
containing pasta sauce or juice, for instance, it can be washed and used for storing other foods once its contents are
consumed.
Fact #5: Glass does not absorb smells or colors Plastic containers not only leach dangerous chemicals into food, but
they also absorb smells and can become discolored. Glass containers, on the other hand, do not have this problem. Glass
containers are more aesthetically pleasing as well.

Kicking the Plastic Habit

Of course, it's nearly impossible to avoid all plastic packaging, but it's relatively easy to significantly reduce the amount of
plastic bags, bottles and containers you buy or use.

Many products, such as bottled water for example, are available in glass containers as well as plastic. If you buy your food
fresh from local sources which you should do anyway you can often avoid any packaging at all.

A number of foods are also available in bulk form, meaning that you can use your own recyclable containers to carry and
store them. It's easy to bring your own bags for shopping so that you don't have to use more plastic bags every time you go
to the supermarket.
Reducing your "plastic footprint" isn't difficult at all once you begin to become aware and start looking for alternatives. In fact,
you may be amazed at how much plastic packaging you can actually avoid using once you begin changing your habits.

Many of the things plastics are used for are completely unnecessary, so why not do yourself and the environment a big favor
and start kicking your plastic addiction today?

The Incredible Hidden Life Of Trees

July 21 2016 | From: UpliftConnect

Seven amazing facts you may not know: Trees have captured the human imagination since the
beginning of time. Watching their cycles of growth, shedding of leaves, and re-flowering in the
spring, people have long perceived trees as powerful symbols of life, death, and renewal.
We look to them for inspiration when we need grounding energy, as their roots descending deep into the Earth
remind us of our own connection to and dependence on our planet for stability and life. Trees live for hundreds or
even thousands of years, and so we revere them as keepers of past secrets and sentinels of the future.

Forests cover one-third of the Earths landmass. They provide a home to at least 80% of land-based plants, animals, and
insects. Trees are one of our main defenses against climate change, as they balance our air by absorbing carbon dioxide
from human activities and turning it into oxygen; they also protect watersheds by holding our soil in place.

In honor of the International Day of Forests on March 21, here are seven incredible facts about the hidden life of trees.
tree1Trees have captured the human imagination since the beginning of time.

1. Pando, or the Trembling Giant

Pando is a grove of approximately 47,000 quaking aspen trees in Utah. This remarkable group of trees is considered a
single organism, because all the trees share a single root system and each tree is genetically identical. New trees are
produced by sprouting from the massive parent root system. It is estimated that Pando has been alive at least 80,000 years,
making it one of the oldest living things on the planet.

Consider that when this tree colony first sprouted from the ground, humans would still not arrive on North America for
another 50,000 years. In some parts of the planet, Neanderthal people were still 30,000 years from going extinct. The 106-
acre grove of trees has seen unimaginable changes, living through the ice age and at times being completely burnt down
above ground, but surviving and renewing itself below ground.

Pando treesThe stunning pando trees

2. More than 25% of Western pharmaceuticals originate in rainforest plants.

There are 3,000 plants currently recognized by the U.S. National Cancer Institute as active against cancer cells, and 70% of
these come from rainforests. Perhaps this is why the shamans of the Amazon believe that for every human ailment, the
rainforest holds a cure.

And yet, only 1% of all rainforest plants have actually been studied (by modern science) for medicinal purposes. Imagine
how many valuable healing plants are destroyed or even made extinct as the rainforests are cleared at a rate of 1.5 acres
per second. Due to rainforest destruction, the Earth loses approximately 137 species of plants, animals, and insects per day.

3. Not all rainforests are in tropical zones.

The Pacific Temperate Rainforest is the largest remaining coastal temperate rainforest on Earth. It is situated along the
Pacific Coast and stretches from Northern California up to the Prince William Sound in Alaska. It is characterized by high
amounts of rainfall, more than 10 feet per year in some areas; and in many places the forest grows right up to the shoreline.
It includes the Great Bear Rainforest in western Canada, home to the Spirit Bear, a rare subspecies of black bear with a
white coat.

A National Geographic article about the Great Bear Rainforest states: Grizzlies, black bears, wolves, wolverines, humpback
whales, and orcas thrive along a coast that has been home to First Nations like the Gitgaat for hundreds of generations. Its
a spooky, wild, mysterious place: There are wolves here that fish. Deer that swim. Western red cedar trees that have stood
a thousand years or more. And a black bear that is white.
Alt text hereSpirit bear in the Great Bear Rainforest

4. In many cultures, it is believed that hugging a tree releases negative energy from the human
body.

Many people believe that trees, like humans and all living things, possess an energetic vibration and an aura. Because
trees vibrations are slower and deeply connected to the Earth through their roots, connecting with trees can help us to feel
safe, secure, and stable.

Most would agree that a walk in the forest or even simply gazing at a tree provides a deep feeling of peace and serenity,
and can be emotionally and psychologically healing.
5. People in Malaysia maintain a very intimate relationship with trees.

Among the Sngoi indigenous people, a person and a tree can belong together, and this relationship is maintained for life.
When a person belongs with a tree, they also belong with its offspring: any trees that grow from the seeds of the first tree,
no matter how far they become scattered.

Also in Malaysia, trees are planted around houses so closely that the walls of the homes may give way to the growing roots.
In the graveyards, the trees are allowed to take root into graves, and it is said that the trees whisper prayers to the creator
asking for the forgiveness of sins of those buried in that place.These practices speak to an ancient knowing that people and
trees are intimately interconnected throughout life and forever in history.
Hugging a tree can release negative energy from the bodyHugging a tree can release negative energy from the body

6. Trees are literally saving our lives every day.

A July 2014 study showed that trees prevent $6.8 billion per year in averted health costs annually, just in the United States.
It is estimated that by removing massive amounts of air pollution through their leaves, trees prevented 850 human deaths
and 670,000 cases of acute respiratory symptoms in 2010 alone.

Studies show that trees in urban areas are removing 4 to 8 times the pollution from the air as their equivalents in rural areas.
This highlights the importance of planting trees everywhere we possibly can, and especially in highly-populated areas where
pollution is highest.

Trees are saving our livesTrees are an important part of our lives

7. Trees in a forest communicate with one another through underground networks.

Trees are connected below the ground by mycorrhizal fungi, which live symbiotically with the roots of the trees. Both the
trees and the fungi need each other to survive. But thats not all. Because the fungi essentially connect the roots of one tree
to another, the trees can use the fungi to pass nutrients to one another.

So, for example, in winter when aspens are weaker, nearby conifers were found to pass additional nutrients to the aspens to
keep them healthy. Similarly, older, more-established trees pass nutrients through the fungi to young seedlings which need
to grow larger toward the suns light in order to survive. The largest, oldest trees in the forest serve as the hub because they
possess and produce large amounts of resources, and their massive roots spread out in all directions.

When one tree is attacked by insects, it distributes pheromonal chemicals through the fungi beneath the soil to warn nearby
trees of a possible attack so the other trees can prepare by changing the chemical makeup of their leaves. The fungal
networks also strengthen the immune systems of the trees.

So not only do different species of trees help each other out in the forest, but fungi and even other types of plants join the
underground network and communicate together to support the health of the entire ecosystem. There is documented proof
that when a tree is dying, it releases its resources into the root networks so that its neighbors can benefit from the
nourishment that it will no longer need - it is making the ultimate sacrifice.

Trees communicate with each other below the groundTrees communicate with each other below the ground

Natural, Sacred and Wild

In closing, here is a beautiful poem written by Clare Dakin of TreeSisters, which will help you to deepen your connection with
trees and with all of nature:

Let the birds take your clothes

Let the waves undo your holding back
Let the vines unravel your tired mind
And the earth savour your sweat and tears.

Let your stories burn off like rising mist,

As your past and the false floors of curbed self love
Dissolve into butterfly wings and fire flies
As your edges blur and your Planetary Self ignites.

Let the trees bathe your breath

Let the meadows embrace you
Let the mountains and the bees remind you
Let the sky flood in and allow the clouds to guide you.

Let your undoing be as total

As your becoming is beautiful
And when the living world has climbed inside
Enough for you to feel four legs, scales and wings.

May you finally know yourself alive as all things

Indivisible and responsible
Reborn into wholeness
Natural, Sacred and Wild

~ Clare Dakin

The Gloves Come Off On EMF / Mobile / WiFi Radiation + Understanding The Dangers
Of The 5G Rollout
July 20 2016 | From: TakeBackYourPower

If you care about your health, your children, your pets, your environment it is imperative that you
understand the implications of this freight train that is headed down the tracks.

I hope you get the same chills down your spine I get when you read this and are compelled to take swift action!

After reading this post, get informed about the electronic soup we are all frying in. Watch what 18 world class experts are
sharing on the EMF summit.

Untested 28GHz radiation blasting from millions of new hidden antennas and tuned-up "smart" meters. A corporate free-for-
all, with oversight eliminated. Total, for-profit surveillance. An "internet of everything" with "hundreds of billions of
microchippable products". Everywhere and everything... and eventually, everyone.

This is not sci-fi. This is FCC Commissioner Tom Wheeler's insane new plan, slickly badged as "5G". The US government's
own NTP cancer study inconveniently concluded that yes - cellular radiation DOES increase cancer. Now, the industy-
lobbyist-turned-government-czar gave an uber-creepy speech invoking technocracy's endgame with a stomach-churning
sense of urgency.
Check out Wheeler's creepy speech for yourself, here. He stammers through it like a man mostly-possessed. This is
desperation on their part. They know full well that the next phase of the megalomanic rollout needs to happen before the
SHTF for them, and the tipping point is reached in terms of a convergent awareness of wireless health / surveillance /
technocratic insanity- and their liability.

So let's engage and make some noise. Your voice is needed today. This plan is being fast-tracked & voted on tomorrow,
Thursday July 14. Let the FCC and this government know that if they do not listen to science and reason, they will be held
accountable and liable for their actions. Money is not only their god - it's their language.

Speak up and stop 5G now.

This one is heavy. Hang in there. It is darkest before the dawn. But in the night, act we must.

So it's handy when you contact the FCC & reps, here once again is a list of science-based resources:

1) 34 Scientific Studies Showing Adverse Health Effects From Wi-Fi

2) Several thousand studies that indicate a biological effect and/or harm:

PowerWatch

JustProveIt

RMFportal

StopSmartMeters

3) Radiofrequency science charts to visually compare studies, radiation intensities and biological effects

4) Apple manual states to keep your iPhone away from your body at all times

5) Study: Mobile phones are cooking men's sperm

6) Brain surgeon Dr Charlie Teo warns against mobiles, wireless home appliances

7) American Academy of Pediatrics warns: Limit children's exposure to cellphones

8) More than 60 international warnings on Wi-Fi and microwave radiation

9) A List of Teacher Unions and Parent Teacher Organizations Taking Action On Wi-Fi (USA, Canada, UK, etc).
10) TED Talk from a former Environmental Engineer in Silicon Valley

11) Insurance giant Swiss RE has given electromagnetic frequencies the HIGHEST possible long term risk rating

12) Another insurance giant, Lloyd's of London, will not insure anything wireless

13) Risk Management Magazine - The Invisible Threat: Radiofrequency Radiation Risk

14) US CDC retracts cellphone radiation warning following pressure from industry lobbyists

15) WHO involved in suppression of additional science showing harm, since 2011

16) Study Uncovers How Electromagnetic Fields Amplify Pain in Amputees

17) CEO of 1 Billion-dollar U.K. company speaks out on microwave sickness

18) Dozens of specific scientific abstracts that all show harm

19) Solutions: Reducing Wirelesss Radiation and EMF

20) Solutions: Reducing Your EMF Exposure

 21) Cell Phone Radiation Boosts Cancer Rates in Animals; $25 Million NTP Study Finds Brain Tumors

This is so important and you need to understand it and protect yourself, your family, and your pets. Create a safe
environment and use technology wisely!

Update: July 14, 2016

Theres no stopping this freight train.

In a unanimous vote this morning, the Federal Communications Commission approved a plan to begin readying the United
States for 5G wireless networks.

Its the biggest expansion yet and will make many more people ill!

Now more than ever you need to know how to best protect yourself and your family using technology wisely. Get informed!

MMS Does Not CureStupidity

July 20 2016 | From: JimHumble / MMSnews

You might say to yourself, well, that is a different topic. Yes, it is and let me explain to you why I
feel I needed to write about this topic.
First of all, we at the Genesis II Church have the ability to cure, heal and treat 95+% of the world's diseases
effectively and permanently! This is contrary to the mainstream medical procedures which only treat
symptoms and are not in the business to cure anything!

Did you see what I just wrote? Did it sink in? If what I am saying is true then the people that trust the medical system to
cure them of any disease are wasting their time! The whole system is set up to keep you as a client, i.e. sick your entire
life and dependent on their system. To me, for a person to trust a system like that is pure STUPIDITY. MMS cannot cure
stupidity!

The definition of stupid is lacking thought or intelligence. Example: I just made another stupid mistake.

Another definition of stupid is silly or unwise; showing poor judgment or little intelligence: Example: She was really
stupid to quit her job like that. (Source)

I am not calling anyone stupid but, the action of trusting a system that cannot, will not and does not want to cure anything, is
plain stupid!

Now, you might say, well, that is a little harsh and people just don't know, so they are not stupid but ignorant of the truth.
Well, that might be correct in principle but in reality, if a person is trusting his or her life to a system that is profiting by people
being sick then that is not ignorance but stupidity to me.

Every day people see the population worldwide becoming sicker and sicker. How many of us have seen friends and
relatives die slow painful deaths due to mainstream medical procedures? It is not ignorance when we all see it every day.

The problem is people are lazy and do not want to take control of their own health so, they transfer the control of their most
precious gift and commodity they have -LIFE- to a medical doctor.

The words medical doctor are not synonymous with truth and science.
In our world people today revere, respect and even worship anyone that is called a medical doctor. Although, I
believe people that have worked hard to achieve a certain degree deserve the recognition for their hard work, I don't believe
that they should be blindly followed or believed as having all truth when it comes to health.

I am NOT saying that a man or woman that is studying medicine are not smart individuals. No, just the contrary. They are
some of the smartest people I have known on an intellectual level. The truth is they sincerely believe what they have
been taught is the truth, but they are sincerely wrong!

The sad story is a medical doctor has been trained in a profession that DOES NOT have, as its goal, to cure ANY disease
but to control symptoms of disease. This is taught in every government approved medical school in the world. Government
approved medical schools are nothing more than medical schools that are controlled by the same people that own the
pharmaceutical companies!

Medical Mafia

Paid for fraudulent research science papers: WakingScience Look at the billions pharmaceutical companies are paying for
negligence and fraud by drugs approved by FDA! GSK sued for 3 billion!

Pharmacuetcial heads telling the truth

HPV Vaccine

Brain damage, death and other horrors

Circleofdocs.com

High cholesterol scam

High blood pressure

Create-diseases-for-profit

Pharmaceutical package inserts

 You see all the above facts and you still trust the pharmaceutical / medical industry? How about the fact that the
Rockefeller family has ownership of every drug company in the world

There is a controversial movie called, Vaxxed that exposes how the MMR vaccine is linked to autism. The information is
good about the CDC hiding data but the message from the producer is just plain stupid!

He states that parents should wait until the 3rd year before their child receives the MMR vaccine. A child should never
receive this vaccine no matter what the age! This idea of getting the vaccine in the 3rd year is STUPID! MMS cannot
cure this kind of stupidity!

Links between MMR vaccine and Autism.

Again, I am not calling anyone stupid, only the actions of people I am calling stupid. Can you see why I would say this? Ask
yourself if you are acting stupid in regard to your health? Every person on earth needs to take control of his or her health!
Each person needs to do their due diligence, meaning research it out and see what is best for his or her personal health.

I guarantee that poisoning the body with medicines, toxic chemicals and unhealthy foods is not the way. This is the
allopathic method taught and used in 95% of the world's medical systems! You have to look elsewhere to find how to
restore and maintain health. Here is a guy, Donald, that just left our Colombia Health Restoration Center. He had done his
due diligence and after 10 years finally found what helped him when all other methods he tried failed!
Donald's 30 day experience at the G2 Colombian Health Restoration Center.

Another way to do your own due diligence and take control of your own health is to take the Genesis II Church On line
Video Course.

Here you can not only learn how to start using MMS and the G2 sacraments that cure 95% of the world's diseases but
learn how to make MMS in your own home! We now have over 1750 health ministers worldwide in over 120 countries!
Join us and help us change the world!

Send your family and friends this link to help them understand what the Genesis II Church of Health and Healing is doing
worldwide with MMS and its Sacramental protocols: www.QuantumLeap.is

It has helped a lot of people decide to do their own due diligence in regard to restoring or maintaining their health!

We are changing the world by the 10's of 1,000's

Archbishop Mark S. Grenon

Have you or anyone you know had good results with MMS? Please share a testimony at our MMS Testimonials
site: Write a testimony.

Where to find MMS Testimonials:

MMS Video Testimonials

Written MMS Testimonials

Written MMS Testimonials - G2CFORUM.ORG

MMS Video Testimonials on YouTube

MMS Video Testimonials on Twitter

MMS Video Testimonials on Facebook

Jim Humble Interviews:

Jim Humble Talks to Freedom Central About MMS

More Jim Humble Interviews, Audio, Video

Responses to MMS Critics:

Jim Humble Responds to Rita O'Reilly RTE Current Affairs TV in Dublin Ireland (04-02-2015)

Collection of responses to MMS Critics at the Genesis II Forum

Archbishop's Response to (ABC)'s Lisa Barley Undercover Reporter (03-08-2015)

England Attacks Religous Freedom

Guides - Tutorials - Howtos:

How to make MMS: Sodium Chlorite 22.4% (YouTube)

CD Autism recovery statistics:

The book: 'Healing The Symptoms Known as Autism'.

A total of 223 children have been recovered (ATEC score of 10 or below,) using the CD Autism parasite protocol published
in Kerri Riveras new book Healing the Symptoms Known as Autism available here. CD stands for Chlorine Dioxide, which is
an inexpensive, broad spectrum, gentle, anti-pathogenic.

Undeniable proof that the Red Cross cured 154 Malaria cases with MMS, in their water purification study in Uganda,
2012: This video was leaked and released 1st of July 2013 and makes it impossible for the Red Cross to keep claiming that
the study never took place, as was their response to the 2nd of may video.

Red Cross cures 154 Malaria cases in Uganda with MMS: This video was released 2nd of May 2013.

Autism Moms with MMS miracle stories (videos).

Basic Science of MMS: Read more (MMS wiki)

MMS Truthful Wiki: mmswiki.is

The Roots Of Mental Health - Maybe Theyre Not In Our Heads + Rising Rates Of
Suicide: Are Pills The Problem?
July 17 2016 | From: Goop / KellyBroganMD / NatutralNews / Various

The number of people - and women in particularwho are taking antidepressants worldwide ha[s
skyrocketed in recent years. Here in the States, the count is at 30 million. One out of every four
women in their forties and fifties takes them.
And antidepressants arent just being prescribed for depression; theyre being given to those of us struggling with
PMS, stress, irritability, anxiety, lack of sleep, and so on. But what if antidepressants arent a cure for any of these
conditions, or even a safe way to treat the symptoms?

Related: New Research Discovers That Depression Is An Allergic Reaction To Inflammation

In her book, A Mind of Your Own, Dr. Kelly Brogan (board certified in psychiatry, psychosomatic medicine, and integrative
holistic medicine) argues that our common understanding of depression as a disease caused by chemical imbalances in the
brain isentirely wrong.
Lifestyle imbalances, and inflammation, she explains, are actually at the root of depression and anxiety. Dr. Brogans case
against conventional medicine - backed up by a veritable library of shocking research studies, along with personal stories we
can all relate to - is very compelling.

As are her suggested solutions (and 30-day action plan) for finally feeling well and like yourself, pill-free. Below, Dr. Brogan
shares a new paradigm for mental health.

A Q&A with Kelly Brogan, M.D.

One of your big arguments is that depression is not a disease, but a symptom - can you explain?

We have been told a story about depression: that its likely genetically driven and if it develops, its because of brain chemical
imbalances that require management by chemical medications, often for the rest of our lives.

This is a false tale that has been sold to us by an industry that has influenced the training of doctors and has spent
billions on messaging patients through direct-to-consumer advertising. I invested my entire career in this narrative as a
conventionally trained psychiatrist until I learned the truth.

In six decades, there has been no evidence of a discrete chemical imbalance that causes depression. This isnt all
that surprising, however, when you zoom out a bit to realize that depression is not one thing. It is an indication of
imbalance.

Its as if your toe hurts - it can hurt because you have an infection in the toenail, you have a string tied around it too tight, or
you dropped a hammer on it. The hurting is just an invitation to investigate further to identify the best way to resolve the
problem.

It is time, even according to leaders in the field, to let go of the chemical imbalance theory and take a fresh look at what the
science says. Depression is rooted in inflammation, not the brain. The human body interacts with its environment with deep
intelligence. Your body creates symptoms for a reason.

Depression is a meaningful symptom of a mismatch, biologically, with lifestyle - we eat a poor diet, harbor too much stress,
lack sufficient physical movement, deprive ourselves of natural sunlight, expose ourselves to environmental toxins, and take
too many drugs. Inflammation is the language that the body speaks, expressing imbalance, telling you that something is
wrong somewhere that needs your attention.

We usually suppress these symptoms with medication, but that is like turning off the smoke alarm when you have a
fire.

What if your depression is actually a thyroid imbalance? Blood sugar instability? Food intolerance or a side effect of a
medication? It makes little sense to treat any of these reversible conditions with a psychiatric medication, but its easy to fall
into the trap of the quick fix, particularly if you are a woman.

Women are twice as likely to be prescribed medication when they present to their doctors with complaints like flat mood,
fogginess, poor concentration, poor motivation, and feelings of overwhelm.

Depression is an opportunity. It is a sign for us to stop and figure out whats causing our imbalance rather than just
masking, suppressing, or rerouting the symptoms. Its a chance to choose a new story, to engage in radical
transformation, to say yes to a different life experience.

Modern antidepressants are based on the idea that serotonin improves mood. But you make the case that this is all a myth -
how?

Despite being taught, in my training, that antidepressants were to the depressed (and to the anxious, OCD, IBS, PTSD,
bulimic, anorexic, etc.) what glasses are to the near-sighted, I dont buy this anymore. I dont think patients are getting the
whole truth.
Heres the deal: There is not a single human study that supports the monoamine hypothesis of depression, which is the
idea that depression is caused by a certain kind of chemical imbalance in the brain, such as under-activity of serotonin.

The only studies in which tryptophan (an amino acid precursor to serotonin) depletion resulted in depression were in patients
who had previously taken antidepressants.

Imaging studies, post-mortem suicide assessments, and animal models have never yielded consistent patterns of
neurotransmitter levels, metabolites, or receptor profiles. Compelling discussions by Drs. Joanna Moncrieff and David
Cohen suggest that antidepressants actually create abnormal states rather than repair them.

They use the analogy of alcohols disinhibiting effects: The fact that booze can ease ones social phobia does not imply that
alcohol is an appropriate treatment or a correcting agent.

Direct-to-consumer advertising in America has allowed pharmaceutical companies to teach the public about brain chemical
imbalances and serotonin deficiencies through cleverly worded taglines and absent FDA-policing.

But they do work! Say many patients and their prescribers. And they do work! Sometimes. Thanks to active placebo effect or
expectations of relief that manifest as actual physiologic changes - as demonstrated by Harvards Dr. Irving Kirsch, a placebo
effect expert. (He also collected unpublished data to show that more studies demonstrated lack of effect compared to
marginal benefit largely attributed to placebo.)

Whats the thread that connects our gut and brain to inflammation and depression?

I think that for most of us, the impact of the brain on the gut is intuitive. Weve all had butterflies with excitement, lost our
appetite when weve fallen in love, or had diarrhea before a big performance or event. Whats less intuitive, but now has
been substantiated by two decades of medical research, is the impact of the gut on the brain.

We now understand that the gut communicates information to the brain about the environment and that the microbial ecology
of our gut - the microbiome manages this communication. The language used by the body is inflammatory messengers.

In this way, depression joins the ranks of all of the diseases of modern civilization, including heart disease, autoimmunity,
and cancer. The body is setting off alarm bells in the form of inflammation in an effort to adapt to perceived stressors.
The most powerful way to send a signal of safety is to heal the gut through whole foods. Ancient medical practices
from Ayurveda to Chinese medicine have known this for thousands of years. We are just learning about the complex
interconnectedness between all of these systems we have come to believe are separate entities.

How does food affect our mood, and what kind of diet do you recommend to your patients struggling with
stress/anxiety/depression?

We dont eat food anymore. We eat food-like products, and when we eat actual foods, they have often been grown in
depleted soil, shipped across the globe, and saturated with chemicals. Food is not just fuel, though. Food is information, and
it speaks to our genes.

We no longer can get away with eating food that screams at our genes. We need food that whispers a love song. The wrong
food can impact your mood by driving blood sugar imbalance (which can masquerade as anxiety attacks, chronic fatigue,
ADHD, and depression), by impacting your brain through your immune system in the case of dairy and wheat, and by
depriving you of nutrients essential to balance hormones, your gut, your immune system, and your nervous system.
I work with a dietary template that I used to put my own Hashimotos thyroiditis into remission and that has worked with
hundreds of patients. It is a diet high in natural fat, and organic foods, including those from animals. As a former ethical
vegetarian, it has taken a lot of research, learning, and mentorship from the now late Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez to appreciate the
role of animal foods in healing certain conditions.

In the end, the dietary template I recommend often just feels right to the women it is meant to heal. Its almost like Im giving
them permission to eat what they already know, deep down, that they should be eating.

Whats the latest research on the link between toxins and anxiety/depression?

We are swimming in a sea of 80,000+ unstudied chemicals that we never evolved, over 2.5 million years, to recognize. Our
immune systems are ablaze because of it and our hormones are going haywire.

I have grave concerns about endocrine-disrupting plastics, about fluoride in our tap water that directly affects the brain and
thyroid, about pesticides that decimate healthy gut bacteria, and about neurotoxic metals like mercury and aluminum.
Mostly, we are beginning to see that the dose doesnt necessarily make the poison and that small amounts of these
chemicals combine and interact with our systems in unique ways to cause significant problems, many of which manifest
psychiatrically.

We have to also include medications, now the third leading cause of death in, in this discussion. Medications from antibiotics
to birth control pills to antacids to over-the-counter pain relievers to even antidepressants themselves are based on a one-
size-fits-all model of human physiology. This can be Russian Roulette-causing, and perpetuate chronic mental illness.

What are other important lifestyle changes that can make a significant difference?

I put food first and I work with my patients to take this prescription very seriously. I want them to experience an internal shift
through prioritizing nutrition. When they do, they understand that the power to change their experience was always just under
their nose. They dont need a doctor or a guru. They just need to get back to basics and honor themselves.

I also ask them to start with 3-12 minutes a day of a Kundalini yoga medical meditation. We have to rewire the nervous
system, our perceptions, and release fear. In my experience, this ancient technology can take you there and beyond, very
quickly.
I ask them to move. This can be 20 minutes a week of high intensity, low volume interval training on an elliptical. It can be
dance or yoga. I ask them to honor their sleep and we begin detoxification of their home environment - products, air, water,
and electromagnetics.

We also engage in a mindset shift. Through this process, we remember what we have forgotten - that the body is best at self-
healing if we just get out of our own way. We realize that we can reclaim something we gave away. Something thats not
available through a model of care based on life-long pharmaceuticals.

Its that feeling that we are always missing something even if our symptoms are managed. Its our personal power and
fearlessness. With this, anything is possible, including becoming medication-free after decades of exposure. Remember, this
is your journey for a reason and there are no regrets.

Which medical tests can actually help pinpoint the root cause of what we commonly think of as mood disorders?

At the very start of treatment, as my patients begin my strict dietary protocol, I order the following tests:

Thyroid function tests: TSH, free T3, free T4, thyroid autoantibodies, and reverse T3

Underlying genetic variant: the MTHFR gene test (the MTHFR gene produces the MTHFR enzyme,
methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, which is essential for several bodily processes that directly tie into mental
well-being)

Signs of vitamin B12 deficiency: serum vitamin B12 levels and homocysteine levels, which can detect B12
deficiency as well

Levels of inflammation: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein

Blood sugar balance: Hemoglobin A1C

 Vitamin D deficiency: Levels of 25OH vitamin D in the blood

For people who are on antidepressant meds and who want to get off them, whats your recommendation?

This has become my unintended specialty. I have learned that these medications can be some of the most challenging of all
chemicals to detox from and that their withdrawal syndromes are serious.

I believe everyone deserves a chance at a new chapter and a shift in mindset to one that embraces their human experience
as meaningful and rejects the illusion of the magic pill that promises to keep you punching the clock. When my patients
decide they are ready to taper off of medication, first we begin with healing their body.

If you imagine yourself to be a bucket that is almost full, the stress of a taper is likely to cause overflow. If we can drain the
bucket with lifestyle changes like those outlined in my program first, then the taper can be a relative breeze.

A typical pace can be determined after a test dose decrease of approximately 25% of the total daily dose. After 2-4 weeks,
if this has been tolerated, this increment can be attempted at a pace of every 2-4 weeks. Many patients will need to drop
down to 10% of the total dose, particularly closer to the final 25% of the total dose.

Because withdrawal effects can be delayed and fluctuate, it can be challenging to identify whether symptoms are related to a
recent dose decrease or even a previous one. Remaining stable for several months may sometimes be necessary before
proceeding.

In my practice, I never taper if fear is the dominant emotion. We have too much data that tells us about the power of what is
called expectancy (belief around what is happening in treatment) to determine the outcome of an intervention. If you are
afraid of life without meds, life without meds will come back to scare you.

If, on the other hand, you feel empowered, energized, and excited about awakening to your true self and moving through this
window, then you will succeed. I do not start patients on meds under any circumstances, so if they struggle after a completed
medication taper, we never return to meds.

This means that we ask why they are struggling, we investigate whether it is physiologic and/or psycho-spiritual, and we
commit to sitting in it for a bit, making space for it, until it becomes clear. This is a different mindset. Its one of tolerance,
patience, and trust. Fear is something we name, acknowledge, and allow, but do not engage or react from.

Related: Celiac Psychosis - Can Wheat Make You Crazy?

Rising Rates Of Suicide: Are Pills The Problem?

If youve read recent reports that state US suicide rates surge to a 30 year high, you might first
justify the reality with the fact that things feel very wrong in our world today. On a personal,
national, and planetary level, people are suffering to survive and the distress is coming from all
sides medical to economic to existential.

But you probably also wonder why more people are choosing this permanent and self-destructive path, and feel
compelled to submit to seemingly logical appeals to provide these individuals more help and greater access to
treatment. Surprise: that may be the last thing our population of hopeless and helpless needs. Lifes inevitable
challenges are not the problem. Its the drugs we use that are fueling suicide.

Related: Do Cavemen have the Real Cure for Depression?

While in college at MIT, I studied neuroscience, and I worked an overnight volunteer suicide hotline. Suicide and untimely
deaths from substance abuse abound at MIT. I went to medical school at Cornell, and completed my residency and
fellowship at Bellevue / NYU because I believed that psychiatrists had cracked the code of human suffering, and I wanted to
do my part to alleviate pain.

I believed that people who were struggling had a chemical imbalance and that we needed to do our best to help them access
the pharmaceutical support they would need, for the rest of their lives.
Over the past decade, through my research into the literature Ive learned that the data tells a very different story about the
safety and efficacy of psychiatric medications. In general, there are two characteristically distinct groups of individuals who
commit suicide those who have never been in psychiatric treatment, and those who have.

Contrary to what you might think, compelling evidence shows that those who have committed suicide outside of contact with
psychiatric treatment, were not mentally ill and struggling in silence. In fact, they were likely influenced by significant social,
cultural, and economic factors, that, compounded by a deep sense of disconnection from others and community, left self-
harm as the only seemingly viable option.

With the ever-expanding diagnostic criteria that can be used to pathologize those wrestling with psychosocial stressors,
many of these suicide victims are diagnosed as mentally ill by psychological autopsy. What if, as the literature
demonstrates, improvements in income could have alleviated their illness as effectively as a clinical intervention?

Does that mean that they were never really mentally ill or clinically depressed, but just grappling with life circumstances?
Should citizens in legitimate distress be treated with medication as if they had a brain chemical disorder?

According to available data 3 large meta-analyses more psychiatry means more suicide. In multi-country, large-scale
longitudinal studies, suicide rates have increased while at the same time weve increased psychiatric funding, treatment, and
access. How could this be?

As many prominent voices including Robert Whitaker, Dr. David Healy, Dr. Peter Gotzsche, Dr. Peter Breggin, Dr. Irving
Kirsch, and Dr. Joanna Moncrieff have researched, the untold story of psychiatric medications includes their propensity to
induce violence, in otherwise non-violent individuals, against self and others.

This is a shocking assertion:

The medications we are offering to help those in distress may be leading patients to the very outcomes we
are most hoping to avoid. In this way, prescribing an antidepressant to someone who is suffering may be
like holding out a knife to someone who is falling off a cliff.

In fact, based on his research, Dr. Peter Gotzsche, founder of the Nordic Cochrane Collaboration, claims, Our citizens would
be far better off if we removed all the psychotropic drugs from the market, as doctors are unable to handle them. It is
inescapable that their availability creates more harm than good.
What is he basing that statement on?

One of the concerns relates to the propensity for psychotropic drugs to have unpredictable and poorly studied effects on
behavior. In fact, evidence for increased violence and impulsivity on these drugs dates back to the 1950s. The driving force
appears to be an experience of akathesia, or a combination of increased energy, restlessness, and discomfort in ones own
skin.

In 2010, Thomas Moore of the Institute for Safe Medication Practices and his colleagues identified 1527 cases of violence,
including homicides, disproportionally reported to the FDA for 31 drugs, including varenicline, eleven antidepressants, six
sedative / hypnotics and three drugs for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

These medications are often prescribed for daily experiences of distress ranging from the loss of a pet to marital discord - not
for clinical syndromes of what we are calling mental illness. Lucire and Crotty reported in 10 cases of impulsive violence and
homicide in patients who were prescribed outside of a formal psychiatric diagnosis, and who went on to commit these crimes
in a state of medication-induced intoxication.

Dr. David Healy has corroborated this risk through a publication on the treatment of 20 healthy volunteers with sertraline
(Zoloft), finding that two of them became acutely suicidal a veritable smoking gun.

As Healy testified in a 2001 civil trial, even several doses of Paxil can lead an otherwise stable individual to murder his wife,
daughter, granddaughter, and then kill himself. In a case series, patients with no history of suicidality went on to develop
intense, violent suicidal preoccupation within 2-7 weeks of treatment with Prozac.

These cases appear to occur predominantly in people who have genetic variants that reduces their livers ability to
metabolize drugs, compounded by the use of multiple medications.

The most recent analysis published in the Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine analyzed three cases of homicide and
attempted suicide and determined that:

All three cases exhibit genotype-based diminished metabolic capability that, in combination with their enzyme
inhibiting / competing medications, decreased metabolism further and are the likely cause of these catastrophic
events.
But with most doctors unaware of this phenomenon and no screening measures in place to identify these high-risk
individuals, psychotropic prescriptions are a Russian Roulette.

The FDA has been dancing around the evidence since 1990 when the risk of antidepressants to cause suicide was explored
in a hearing but deemed too preliminary. Subsequently, in 2004, the FDA issued a black-box warning about the risk of
suicide in children and adolescents prescribed antidepressants, expanded to adults in 2005, and to all antidepressants in
2010.

A reanalysis of study 329 which initially served as a landmark study in 2001 supporting the prescription of
antidepressants to children, has now demonstrated that these medications are ineffective in this population and
cause suicide.

Concealing and manipulating data that shows this signal of harm, including a doubling of risk of suicide with antidepressant
treatment, has been an ongoing challenge to true informed consent.

In fact, a reanalysis of an influential US National Institute of

Mental Health 2007 study, revealed a four-fold increase in
suicide despite the fact that the initial publication
claimed no increased risk relative to placebo.

As data is reanalyzed, a clearer picture of the adverse event

profiles of antidepressants emerges.

From 1999-2013, psychiatric medication prescriptions have

increased by a whopping 117% concurrent with a 240%
increase in death rates from these medications.

No wonder Dr. Gotzsche counts psychiatric

medications as the third leading cause of death,
worldwide.

With deteriorating outcomes in mental illness, increasing

suicides, and violence, perhaps it is time to explore
alternative perspectives on how to ease suffering with a
focus on root cause resolution.

My patient, Lisa, reminds me of the importance of this. She

attempted suicide after struggling with flat mood, fogginess,
irritability, and insomnia postpartum, and being treated with
Paxil.

Within two weeks, she had written a suicide note and was
planning to jump off of the top of her 16-story New York
apartment building.
She told me, it just made perfect sense. Since the discovery of her note, a hospitalization, and a switch to sertraline, she has
come into my care, and we have weaned her off medication and diagnosed her with Hashimotos thyroiditis an autoimmune
condition that is common in the postpartum period.

It often entails notable mood and cognitive symptoms that can be put into remission through lifestyle and dietary change.
Antidepressants were never the appropriate treatment for her and could have cost her her life.

It is time for a new approach to the complexity of mental illness and its many reversible root causes from physiologic to
psychosocial. Unfortunately, the available pharmaceutical treatment options, as a one-size-fits-all, may be responsible for
driving the very problem they claim to treat and prevent.

Improve Mental Health Without Prescriptions

Bombshell Study Admits Antidepressants Increase Suicide Attempts In teens And Are
Completely Worthless For Treating Depression

A bombshell study published in the medical journal The Lancet admits what Natural News and
others in the holistic health community have been reporting for years: antidepressants kill. On
Wednesday, researchers published the most comprehensive analysis to date of the safety and
efficacy of widely prescribed antidepressants in children and teens.
What they found is that the majority of antidepressants prescribed to young people have far more risks than
benefits, doing essentially nothing to ease symptoms of depression, while significantly increasing suicidal thoughts
and suicide attempts, CBS News is reporting.

Out of 14 antidepressants analyzed by researchers, only one fluoxetine (marketed under the name Prozac and Sarafem)
proved effective for relieving symptoms of depression better than a placebo pill.

Venlafaxine (Effexor), on the other hand, was shown to increase the risk of suicidal tendencies in children and teens
compared to a placebo and five other antidepressants.

The study results are major considering the fact that antidepressant use among young people is at an all-time high.
Shockingly, children under 5-years-old are the fastest growing group being prescribed mind-altering drugs.

Most antidepressants do NOTHING to help depression, study finds

Antidepressant use among children and teens rose from 1.3 to 1.6 percent between 2005 and 2012, according to a separate
study published in The Lancet.

As the authors of this latest study confirm, the implications of drugging children with powerful, mind-altering drugs is
completely unpredictable, which is why international guidelines encourage doctors to use non-drug approaches including
"cognitive behavioral or interpersonal therapy."

Lead study author Dr. Andrea Cipriani says that because brains in children and teens are not yet developed, it's important to
lead with caution when prescribing medication, "because we don't know the potential implications in the long term ... ."
The U.S National Institutes of Health estimates that some 2.8 million children (or about 11 percent) between the ages of 12
and 17 have suffered from at least one episode of depression, for which we now know that antidepressant drugs are totally
worthless.

Dr. Cipriani explains that depression in children differs widely from that of adults.

Not only is it still under-diagnosed and under-treated but also it tends to present in a different way," he said.

"Depressive symptoms in children and adolescents are rather undifferentiated. You notice more irritability,
aggressive behavior and problems at school.

And consequences of depressive episodes in children and adolescents are dramatic because they include
impairments in their social functioning but also an increased risk of suicidal ideation and attempts."

FDA privy to antidepressant harm in children for decades

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has known for more than a decade that antidepressants pose immense harm to
patients, particularly children, which is why it implemented "black box" warnings in 2004 for users under the age of 24. The
labels clearly state that the drugs up your chances of becoming suicidal or intensify preexisting suicidal thoughts and
behavior.
Yet, irresponsible physicians continue to push harmful drugs on children and teens that alter brain chemistry. Not only that,
but doctors are increasingly prescribing the drugs for off-label uses.

This was substantiated just weeks ago in a study published in the May issue of the Journal of the American Medical
Association (JAMA), which found that nearly half of people prescribed antidepressants aren't even depressed.

After analyzing a decade of antidepressant prescription records, researchers concluded that only 55 percent were given for
depression, while the remaining 45 percent was written for conditions such as anxiety, sleeping problems, pain, panic
disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Doctors prescribing depression pills for pretty much anything

Other off-label uses include digestive problems, eating disorders, migraines and menopausal symptoms. Twenty-nine
percent of antidepressant prescriptions were written for off-label uses. The study authors expressed grave concerns about
the fact that these drugs, which are proven to be dangerous, are being prescribed for conditions for which there is no
evidence supporting their efficacy, or safety for that matter.

The reason doctors are pushing unproven drugs, is because they're being advised to do so by Big Pharma, and not by
scientific research, said the study authors.
Further illustrating just how worthless these drugs are, medical researcher Peter Gotzsche said last year that nearly all
psychiatric drugs, including antidepressants, could be withdrawn from the market without damaging public health. In fact, he
recommends it.

Related: Benzos: A Dance With the Devil

Related: World Benzodiazepine Awareness Day 2016

The Hidden Costs Of PepsiCo's Palm Oil

July 18 2016 | From: SumOfUs / SayNoToPalmOil

Whats the hidden cost of the cheap palm oil used in Doritos, Cheetos, and other PepsiCo
snacks found in your supermarket aisles?
Its the countless workers exploited at the hands of the palm oil industry in South East Asia -- where PepsiCos
products are made.

Related: Palm Oil: The dangerous ingredient youre eating - and dont even know it

There are stories of workers being lured to Indonesia or Malaysia, only to find themselves trapped on palm oil plantations
with no money, no passport, with no days off. Those who work spraying pesticides dont have the proper equipment, and are
exposed to toxic chemicals.

Some workers dont even get paid - especially women and children.

But we can help end the exploitation by showing solidarity with palm oil workers. Our friends at Rainforest Action
Network have made a video to expose PepsiCos ties to the human cost of palm oil.

Please click here to help share this SumOfUs campaign so that more people are aware of these terrible practices
and so that pressure can be put on PepsiCo.

PepsiCo buys a whopping 450,000 tonnes of cheap palm oil per year. Its sole producer in Indonesia is IndoFood -- one
of the largest palm oil growers in the world.

IndoFood has been linked to the suffering of countless workers and the clearing of vast swathes of lush
rainforest. To feed the rising global demand for palm oil, the homes of orangutans, rhinos, and elephants are being
destroyed.

One by one were losing these endangered animals.

It doesnt have to be this way. Working with our partners, the SumOfUs community has pushed huge companies like
McDonalds, Dunkin Donuts, Kelloggs, Starbucks and many more to adopt sustainable palm oil policies. By standing
together, we make ourselves powerful.

We can do it again. But we have to amp up the pressure to force PepsiCo to move.
Say No To Palm Oil

Palm oil is a type of edible vegetable oil that is derived from the palm fruit, grown on the African oil palm tree. Oil palms are
originally from Western Africa, but can flourish wherever heat and rainfall are abundant.

Today, palm oil is grown throughout Africa, Asia, North America, and South America, with 85% of all palm oil globally
produced and exported from Indonesia and Malaysia; but most of the time not using sustainable measures.

The industry is linked to major issues such as deforestation, habitat degradation, climate change, animal cruelty and
indigenous rights abuses in the countries where it is produced, as the land and forests must be cleared for the development
of the oil palm plantations.

According to the World Wildlife Fund, an area the equivalent size of 300 football fields of rainforest is cleared each hour to
make way for palm oil production. This large-scale deforestation is pushing many species to extinction, and findings show
that if nothing changes species like the orangutan could become extinct in the wild within the next 5-10 years, and Sumatran
tigers less than 3 years.

In total, 50 million tons of palm oil is produced annually, supplying over 30% of the worlds vegetable oil production. This
single vegetable oil is found in approximately 40-50% of household products in countries such as United States, Canada,
Australia and England.

Palm oil can be present in a wide variety of products, including: baked goods, confectionery, shampoo, cosmetics, cleaning
agents, washing detergents and toothpaste.

Read more about palm oil at: SayNoToPalmOil

The Sugar Conspiracy - Professor John Yudkin: The Man Who Tried To Warn Us
About Sugar
July 9 2016 | From: TheGuardian / TheTelegraph
In 1972, a British scientist sounded the alarm that sugar and not fat was the greatest danger to
our health. But his findings were ridiculed and his reputation ruined. How did the worlds top
nutrition scientists get it so wrong for so long?

Robert Lustig is a paediatric endocrinologist at the University of California who specialises in the treatment of
childhood obesity. A 90-minute talk he gave in 2009, titled Sugar: The Bitter Truth, has now been viewed more than
six million times on YouTube. In it, Lustig argues forcefully that fructose, a form of sugar ubiquitous in modern
diets, is a poison culpable for Americas obesity epidemic.

A year or so before the video was posted, Lustig gave a similar talk to a conference of biochemists in Adelaide, Australia.
Afterwards, a scientist in the audience approached him. Surely, the man said, youve read Yudkin. Lustig shook his head.
John Yudkin, said the scientist, was a British professor of nutrition who had sounded the alarm on sugar back in 1972, in a
book called Pure, White, and Deadly.

"If only a small fraction of what we know about the effects of sugar were to be revealed in relation to any other
material used as a food additive, wrote Yudkin, that material would promptly be banned.

The book did well, but Yudkin paid a high price for it. Prominent nutritionists combined with the food industry to destroy his
reputation, and his career never recovered. He died, in 1995, a disappointed, largely forgotten man.

Perhaps the Australian scientist intended a friendly warning. Lustig was certainly putting his academic reputation at risk
when he embarked on a high-profile campaign against sugar. But, unlike Yudkin, Lustig is backed by a prevailing wind. We
read almost every week of new research into the deleterious effects of sugar on our bodies.

In the US, the latest edition of the governments official dietary guidelines includes a cap on sugar consumption. In the UK,
the chancellor George Osborne has announced a new tax on sugary drinks.

Sugar has become dietary enemy number one.

This represents a dramatic shift in priority. For at least the last three decades, the dietary arch-villain has been saturated fat.
When Yudkin was conducting his research into the effects of sugar, in the 1960s, a new nutritional orthodoxy was in the
process of asserting itself. Its central tenet was that a healthy diet is a low-fat diet.

Yudkin led a diminishing band of dissenters who believed that sugar, not fat, was the more likely cause of maladies such as
obesity, heart disease and diabetes. But by the time he wrote his book, the commanding heights of the field had been
seized by proponents of the fat hypothesis. Yudkin found himself fighting a rearguard action, and he was defeated.

Not just defeated, in fact, but buried. When Lustig returned to California, he searched for Pure, White and Deadly in
bookstores and online, to no avail. Eventually, he tracked down a copy after submitting a request to his university library. On
reading Yudkins introduction, he felt a shock of recognition.

"Holy crap, Lustig thought. This guy got there 35 years before me.

You can continue reading this article here - but be warned that it does go off on the tangent that saturated fats are also
bad for you which is also mainstrame propaganda that has been proven wrong:

9 Lies About Fat That Destroyed The World's Health

Your Body Is Electrical And Runs On Electrons NOT Sugar, Protein Or Fat!

Even though the medical establishment are still trtying to quash this new development:

Low-Carbohydrate, High Fat Diet Advice Questioned

Indeed the following article is on the same topic, and while it is correct about sugar, as the preceeding article is, it too
contains red herrings about saturated fats:

John Yudkin: the man who tried to warn us about sugar

As The War On Weed Winds Down, Will Monsanto Be The Big Winner?
July 8 2016 | From: EllenBrown

The war on cannabis that began in the 1930s seems to be coming to an end. Research shows that
this natural plant, rather than posing a deadly danger to health, has a wide range of therapeutic
benefits.

But skeptics question the sudden push for legalization, which is largely funded by wealthy investors linked to Big
Ag and Big Pharma.

Related: Mexico - Nieto Proposes Marijuana Legalization

Related: Canada - Marijuana Legalization Process to Begin in Canada Next Spring

In April, Pennsylvania became the 24th state to legalize medical cannabis, a form of the plant popularly known as marijuana.
That makes nearly half of US states.

A major barrier to broader legalization has been the federal law under which all cannabis even the very useful form known
as industrial hemp is classed as a Schedule I controlled substance that cannot legally be grown in the US.

But that classification could change soon. In a letter sent to federal lawmakers in April, the US Drug Enforcement
Administration said it plans to release a decision on rescheduling marijuana in the first half of 2016.

The presidential candidates are generally in favor of relaxing the law. In November 2015, Senator Bernie
Sanders introduced a bill that would repeal all federal penalties for possessing and growing the plant, allowing states to
establish their own marijuana laws.
Hillary Clinton would not go that far but would drop cannabis from a Schedule I drug (a deadly dangerous drug with no
medical use and high potential for abuse) to Schedule II (a deadly dangerous drug with medical use and high potential for
abuse).

Republican candidate Donald Trump says we are losing badly in the war on drugs, and that to win that war all drugs need to
be legalized.

Related: Cannabis Saved This Man From One of the Worst Man-Made Disasters in US History

But it is Green Party presidential candidate Dr. Jill Stein who has been called weeds biggest fan. Speaking from the
perspective of a physician and public health advocate, Stein notes that hundreds of thousands of patients suffering from
chronic pain and cancers are benefiting from the availability of medical marijuana under state laws.

State economies are benefiting as well. She cites Colorado, where retail marijuana stores first opened in January 2014.
Since then, Colorados crime rates and traffic fatalities have dropped; and tax revenue, economic output from retail
marijuana sales, and jobs have increased.

Among other arguments for changing federal law is that the marijuana business currently lacks access to banking facilities.
Most banks, fearful of FDIC sanctions, wont work with the $6.7 billion marijuana industry, leaving 70% of cannabis
companies without bank accounts.

"Theres a lot of money left over to address safety issues that come up or really take on projects that these local
communities do not necessarily have the funds to deal with, said Mike Elliott, executive director of the Marijuana
Industry Group. For some communities, this tax revenue has made a huge difference.

Related: Legal Cannabis is Literally Transforming Cities - Funding Roads, Schools, Charities and More

That means billions of dollars are sitting around in cash, encouraging tax evasion and inviting theft, to which an estimated
10% of profits are lost. But that problem too could be remedied soon. On June 16, the Senate Appropriations Committee
approved an amendment to prevent the Treasury Department from punishing banks that open accounts for state-legal
marijuana businesses.

Boosting trade in the new marijuana market is not a good reason for decriminalizing it, of course, if it actually poses a grave
danger to health. But there have been no recorded deaths from cannabis overdose in the US.

Not that the herb cant have problematic effects, but the hazards pale compared to alcohol (30,000 deaths annually) and to
patented pharmaceuticals, which are now the leading cause of death from drug overdose. Prescription drugs taken as
directed are estimated to kill 100,000 Americans per year.

Behind the War on Weed: Taking Down the Worlds Largest Agricultural Crop

The greatest threat to health posed by marijuana seems to come from its criminalization. Today over 50 percent of inmates
in federal prison are there for drug offenses, and marijuana tops the list. Cannabis cannot legally be grown in the US even
as hemp, a form with very low psychoactivity. Why not? The answer seems to have more to do with economic competition
and racism than with health.

Cannabis is actually one of the oldest domesticated crops, having been grown for industrial and medicinal purposes for
millennia. Until 1883, hemp was also one of the largest agricultural crops (some say the largest).

It was the material from which most fabric, soap, fuel, paper and fiber were made. Before 1937, it was also a component of
at least 2,000 medicines.

In early America, it was considered a farmers patriotic duty to grow hemp. Cannabis was legal tender in most of the
Americas from 1631 until the early 1800s. Americans could even pay their taxes with it. Benjamin Franklins paper mill used
cannabis.

Hemp crops produce nearly four times as much raw fiber as equivalent tree plantations; and hemp paper is finer, stronger
and lasts longer than wood-based paper. Hemp was also an essential resource for any country with a shipping industry,
since it was the material from which sails and rope were made.

Today hemp is legally grown for industrial use in hundreds of countries outside the US. A 1938 article in Popular
Mechanics claimed it was a billion-dollar crop (the equivalent of about $16 billion today), useful in 25,000 products ranging
from dynamite to cellophane. New uses continue to be found.
Claims include eliminating smog from fuels, creating a cleaner energy source that can replace nuclear power, removing
radioactive water from the soil, eliminating deforestation, and providing a very nutritious food source for humans and
animals.

To powerful competitors, the plants myriad uses seem to have been the problem.

Cannabis competed with the lumber industry, the oil industry, the cotton industry, the petrochemical industry and the
pharmaceutical industry. In the 1930s, the plant in all its forms came under attack.

Its demonization accompanied the demonization of Mexican immigrants, who were then flooding over the border and were
widely perceived to be a threat. Pot smoking was part of their indigenous culture.

Harry Anslinger, called the father of the war on weed, was the first commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, a
predecessor to the Drug Enforcement Administration.

He fully embraced racism as a tool for demonizing marijuana.

He made such comments as:

"Marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others, and Reefer
makes darkies think theyre as good as white men.

In 1937, sensational racist claims like these caused recreational marijuana to be banned; and industrial hemp was banned
with it.

Classification as a Schedule I controlled substance came in the 1970s, with President Richard Nixons War on Drugs. The
Shafer Commission, tasked with giving a final report, recommended against the classification; but Nixon ignored the
commission.

According to an April 2016 article in Harpers Magazine, the War on Drugs had political motives. Top Nixon aide John
Ehrlichman is quoted as saying in a 1994 interview:

"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black
people. . . .

We knew we couldnt make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the
hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those
communities.

We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the
evening news.

Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."

Competitor or Attractive New Market for the Pharmaceutical Industry?

The documented medical use of cannabis goes back two thousand years, but the Schedule I ban has seriously hampered
medical research. Despite that obstacle, cannabis has now been shown to have significant therapeutic value for a wide
range of medical conditions, including cancer, Alzheimers disease, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, glaucoma, lung disease,
anxiety, muscle spasms, hepatitis C, inflammatory bowel disease, and arthritis pain.

New research has also revealed the mechanism for these wide-ranging effects. It seems the active pharmacological
components of the plant mimic chemicals produced naturally by the body called endocannabinoids.

These chemicals are responsible for keeping critical biological functions in balance, including sleep, appetite, the immune
system, and pain. When stress throws those functions off, the endocannabinoids move in to restore balance.

Inflammation is a common trigger of the disease process in a broad range of degenerative ailments.

Stress triggers inflammation, and cannabis relieves both inflammation and stress.

THC, the primary psychoactive component of the plant, has been found to have twenty times the anti-inflammatory power of
aspirin and twice that of hydrocortisone.

CBD, the most-studied non-psychoactive component, also comes with an impressive list of therapeutic uses, including
against cancer and as a super-antibiotic.

CBD has been shown to kill superbugs that are resistant to currently available drugs. This is a major medical
breakthrough, since for some serious diseases antibiotics have reached the end of their usefulness.

Behind the Push for Legalization

The pharmaceutical industry has both much to gain and much to lose from legalization of the cannabis plant in its various
natural forms. Patented pharmaceuticals have succeeded in monopolizing the drug market globally.
What that industry does not want is to be competing with a natural plant that anyone can grow in his backyard,
which actually works better than very expensive pharmaceuticals without side effects.

Letitia Pepper, who suffers from multiple sclerosis, is a case in point. A vocal advocate for the decriminalization of marijuana
for personal use, she says she has saved her insurance company $600,000 in the last nine years, using medical marijuana
in place of a wide variety of prescription drugs to treat her otherwise crippling disease.

That is $600,000 the pharmaceutical industry has not made, on just one patient.

There are 400,000 MS sufferers in the US, and 20 million people who have been diagnosed with cancer sometime in their
lives.

Cancer chemotherapy is the biggest of big business, which would be directly threatened by a cheap natural plant-
based alternative.

The threat to big industry profits could explain why cannabis has been kept off the market for so long. More suspicious to
Pepper and other observers is the sudden push to legalize it.

They question whether Big Pharma would allow the competition, unless it had an ace up its sleeve.

Although the movement for marijuana legalization is a decades-old grassroots effort, the big money behind the recent
push has come from a few very wealthy individuals with links to Monsanto, the worlds largest seed company and
producer of genetically modified seeds.
In May of this year, Bayer AG, the giant German chemical and pharmaceutical company, made a bid to buy Monsanto.

Both companies are said to be working on a cannabis-based extract.

Natural health writer Mike Adams warns:

"With the cannabis industry predicted to generate over $13 billion by 2020, becoming one of the largest agricultural
markets in the nation, there should be little doubt that companies like Monsanto are simply waiting for Uncle Sam
to remove the herb from its current Schedule I classification before getting into the business.

. . . Other major American commodities, like corn and soybeans, are on average between 88 and 91 percent
genetically modified.

Therefore, once the cannabis industry goes national, and that is most certainly primed to happen, there will be no
stopping the inevitability of cannabis becoming a prostituted product of mad science and shady corporate
monopoly tactics."

With the health benefits of cannabis now well established, the battlefield has shifted from its decriminalization to who can
grow it, sell it, and prescribe it. Under existing California law, patients like Pepper are able to grow and use the plant
essentially for free.

New bills purporting to legalize marijuana for recreational use impose regulations that opponents say would
squeeze home growers and small farmers out of the market, would heighten criminal sanctions for violations, and
could wind up replacing the natural cannabis plant with patented, genetically modified (GMO) plants that must be
purchased year after year.

These new bills and the Monsanto/Bayer connection will be the subject of a follow-up article. Stay tuned.

5 Years Of Saving AIDS Patients With MMS: Dr. Raj Interview

July 6 2016 | From: QuantumLeap

As many professionals are now stepping forward to disclose their testimonies and the truth behind
MMS, Dr. Raj was one of the first to come forward and share her experience with MMS and AIDS
patients.
Dr. Raj has had over 5 years working with MMS and AIDS patients, and in this ground-breaking interview she tells
her story straight from the heart.

Note: This is interview will be featured in our Quantum Leap EMPOWERMENT Platform when it launches, we are releasing
it ahead of time to give people a preview of the quality of content and research we are dedicated to inside of
our science section.

Subtitles as well as translations in all languages will be available in due time when the platform launches, thank
you for your patience!
Still havent seen Quantum Leap? Click here to see the documentary.

The Truth About Mobile Phone And Wireless Radiation: What We Know, What We
Need To Find Out, And What You Can Do Now
July 5 2016 | From: UniversityOfMelbourne

Deans Lecture: Presented by Dr Devra Davis, Visiting Professor of Medicine at the Hebrew
University Hadassah Medical School, and Visiting Professor of Medicine at Ondokuz Mayis
University, Turkey.
What are the health effects of mobile phones and wireless radiation? While Australia has led the world in safety
standards, including compulsory seat-belt legislation, plain packaging on cigarettes, and product and food
disclosure legislation, it falls behind in addressing the significant issues associated with mobile phone use.

In this Deans Lecture, epidemiologist and electromagnetic radiation expert, Dr Devra Davis, will outline the evolution of the
mobile phone and smartphone, and provide a background to the current 19 year old radiation safety standards (SAR), policy
developments and international legislation. New global studies on the health consequences of mobile/wireless radiation will
be presented, including childrens exposure and risks.

Dr Devra Davis is an internationally recognised expert on electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones and other wireless
transmitting devices.

She is currently the Visiting Professor of Medicine at the Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, and Visiting
Professor of Medicine at Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey. Dr Davis was Founding Director of the Center for
Environmental Oncology at The University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute - the first institute of its kind in the world, to
examine the environmental factors that contribute to the majority of cases of cancer.

In 2007, Dr Devra Davis founded nonprofit Environmental Health Trust to provide basic research and education about
environmental health hazards. Dr Davis served as the President Clinton appointee to the Chemical Safety and Hazard
Investigation Board in the U.S.A. from 1994 -1999, an independent executive branch agency that investigates, prevents and
mitigates chemical accidents.
As the former Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Health in the Department of Health and Human Services, she
has counseled leading officials in the United States, United Nations, European Environment Agency, Pan American Health
Organization, World Health Organization, and World Bank.Dr Davis holds a B.S. in physiological psychology and an M.A. in
sociology from the University of Pittsburgh, 1967. She completed a PhD in science studies at the University of Chicago as a

Danforth Foundation Graduate Fellow, 1972 and a M.P.H. in epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins University as a Senior
National Cancer Institute Post-Doctoral Fellow, 1982. She has authored more than 200 publications and has been published
in Lancet and Journal of the American Medical Association as well as the Scientific American and the New York Times.

10 Reasons To Drink Your Milk Raw

July 2 2016 | From: Rawmilk / Various

Reason to Drink Raw Milk #1: Raw milk is a living food.

Unlike pasteurized and ultra-high-temperature (UHT) pasteurized milk, raw milk is a living food. Several of milks
natural components including beneficial bacteria, food enzymes, natural vitamins and immunoglobulins are heat-
sensitive.

Related: Got milk? The Dairy Industry Tricked You Into It

These health-promoting components of natural, raw milk are destroyed by heating and therefore not present in pasteurized
or UHT milk. Indeed, most foods milk included provide best nutrition when consumed in a raw or minimally cooked
state.

While heating milk doesnt change the mineral composition to any great degree, it does, however, change their
bioavailability rendering all that lovely calcium less absorbable.

Related: The "science" that is the justification behind the need to regulate raw cows milk

Reason to Drink Raw Milk #2:

Raw milk is rich in beneficial bacteria.

As a living food, raw milk is rich in beneficial bacteria. These bacteria are critical to your health; indeed,beneficial bacteria
are so critical to human health that you cannot live without them. These bacteria are responsible for stimulating and training
your immune system to function correctly.
They also work in conjunction with your immune system to keep pathogenic bacteria at bay. Indeed, they can be effective in
the prevention and treatment of e. coli, rotavirus and salmonella infections. By consuming foods rich in beneficial bacteria
like raw dairy products and naturally fermented foods you can help to optimize the levels of beneficial bacteria present in
your gut. These bacterial allies are destroyed by pasteurization and are absent in pasteurized and UHT milk.

Reason to Drink Raw Milk #3:

Raw milk is rich in food enzymes.

As a living food, raw milk is also rich in natural food enzymes: lactase, lipase and phosphatase number among many of
these natural enzymes. These enzymes help your body to better digest milk and better metabolize its vital nutrients. Without
these vital enzymes, the milks natural sugars, fats and proteins can cause reactions in individuals prone to food
intolerances.

Enzymes like phosphatase help the body to better absorb milks calcium while other enzymes like amylase and lactase help
you digest the sugars present in milk. Lactoperoxidase, another enzyme found in raw milk, offers antimicrobial properties
which, again, helps to keep potential pathogens at bay. These enzymes are painfully delicate and very heat-sensitive,
pasteurizing milk destroys them and the benefits they convey to you.

Reason to Drink Raw Milk #4

Raw milk is rich in natural vitamins.

The butterfat present in raw milk is rich in natural fat-soluble soluble vitamins, particularly preformed vitamin A, vitamin K
and vitamin E. (Learn more about fat soluble vitamins: vitamin a, d, e and k.) Raw milk is also rich in water-soluble vitamins
like vitamin C and B-complex vitamins. A quart of raw milk from grassfed cows contains approximately 50% more vitamin E
and 7% more folate than pasteurized milk.
Moreover, fresh raw milk naturally contains vitamin C which is completely absent from pasteurized milk. Vitamins, like food
enzymes, are delicate and are largely destroyed by heat; therefore, pasteurized milks are fortified with vitamins and those
fortifying vitamins are synthetic, laboratory-created versions of naturally-occuring vitamins. They are not treated the same
way as natural vitamins by your body.

Reason to Drink Raw Milk #5:

Raw butterfat is rich in Conjugated Linoleic Acid.

Meat and milk from grass-fed animals is rich in fatty compound called Conjugated Linoleic Acid or CLA. Actually classified
as a trans-fatty acid (but a good transfat!), CLA offers myriad myriad positive effects for those who consume it. Indeed,
research indicates that this substance is known to fight cancer (particularly breast, intestinal and bone cancers),
hypertension and adipose obesity.

If youre sourcing your raw milk well, youre only sourcing it from grass-fed cows which means youre consuming this
important fatty acid something thats missing from that factory-farmed, pasteurized and skimmed milk at the grocery store
(and yes, organic milk drinkers theres plenty of factory farming in the organic industry too!)

Reason to Drink Raw Milk #6:

Raw milk supports small farmers, not feedlots.

Pastuerization of milk was born out of necessity as unhealthy cows from concentrated animal feed operations produce
unhealthy milk. Cows sickened by confinement and an unnatural diet of grain and mash produce lackluster, thin milk poor in
vitamins, minerals and other nutrients and rich in pathogenic bacteria. Sick milk from sick cows makes for sick people.
Pasteurization kills pathogenic bacteria just as it kills beneficial bacteria. Rather than tackle unsanitary practices and
concentrated feed operations as the root cause of food illness caused by raw dairy products, government officials instead
mandated pasteurization.

Such action allows industrial dairies to continue operating in a way that sickens their cattle. When you purchase pasteurized
milk at the store unless youre careful about your brand youre purchasing it from industrial farms that promote poor
health among their herd.

By contrast, raw milk is not produced on a massive, concentrated scale. Instead, raw milk producers operate small
operations with fewer cattle spread out over a larger amount of space. Cows arent fed on feedlot grain; rather, their given
space on fresh pasture and spend their time outside with access to shelter when they need it as in the case of inclement
weather.

By choosing to drink raw milk and eschew pasteurized milk, youre supporting small, local farmers who value both their
customers and their herd. Youre supporting sustainable agricultural operations not the dairy mega-industry.

Reason to Drink Raw Milk #7:

Raw milk is not homogenized.

Raw milk is not homogenized; rather, the beautiful fresh raw cream rises to the top to produce a lovely creamline. You can
skim this cream for use in making butter or a beautiful panna cotta, or just shake the jar up to evenly distribute the cream
into the milk for drinking.

This cream and butterfat is in its whole state; it hasnt been homogenized. Homogenization is an intense process that
forcefully breaks up the fat molecules present in butterfat thus allowing them to be suspended in rather than separated from
the liquid milk itself.
This forceful and intense process leaves these delicate fats subject to oxidization. Oxidized fats contribute to heart disease,
hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Homogenization spells bad news for your heart and your body as a whole. Fresh, raw milk
is not homogenized and so the fat molecules remain intact wholesome and healthy.

Reason to Drink Raw Milk #8:

Raw milk is easier to digest.

Fresh, raw milk is easier on your stomach and digestive tract. Components naturally present in raw milk, but killed by
pasteurization, enable you to digest raw milk better than cooked, pasteurized milk.

Lipase, lactase and amylase each enzymes mentioned above work in conjunction with macronutrients present in milk
helping you to better digest the milk as a whole food. Pasteurization, by contrast, renders milk hard to digest. This is
particularly true of the proteins present in milk which are denatured by high heat.

Reason to Drink Raw Milk #9:

Raw milk clabbers.

Leave a carton of pasteurized milk out on the counter for a day, and youll end up with a putrid, stinking glop. By contrast,
raw milk will clabber as its beneficial lactic-acid producing bacteria proliferate and turn raw milk into a probiotic-rich, yogurt-
like food. Bonny clabber is a traditional food originally from Scotland, though most peoples across the globe enjoy similarly
clabbered milks through their traditional food heritage.
Clabbered raw milk is not only edible, but particularly healthful as its sugars have been metabolized by lactic-acid producing
bacteria and continue to proliferate. Since these bacteria have been killed by heat in pasteurized milk, such milk wont
clabber; rather, molds and yeasts will rot the milk. Moreover, milk that has been subject to pasteurization at ultra-high
temperatures isnt even suitable for cheesemaking.

Reason to Drink Raw Milk #10.

Raw milk supports your local economy.

Raw milk is a delicate food and is not suited to traveling long distance, nor is it shelf-stable at room temperature.
Pasteurized milks and UHT milks in particular can and do travel long distances before arriving from the dairy to your door.
These milks are often mixed with the milks of several dairies prior to pasteurization so you, as a consumer, lose the
opportunity to question your dairy farmer about the milk you serve your family.

Further, the money you spend on such milk is divied between your grocery store, the broker/supplier, the branded dairy and,
lastly, the farmer. By purchasing raw milk locally and farmer-direct, 100% of the money you spend on your milk stays in your
farmers pocket and in your local economy.

Related: Avoid Drinking Pasteurized Milk Until You Learn the Shocking Details

These Light Bulbs Cause Anxiety, Migraines, And Even Cancer

June 28 2016 | From: TMZ

In order to save money and energy, a lot of people replaced their old standard light bulbs with eco
-friendly new generation energy- saving light bulbs. Nevertheless, these energy- efficient bulbs are
extremely toxic.
According to a study conducted by researchers from the Fraunhofer Wilhelm Klauditz Institute for Germans
Federal Environment Agency, if broken indoors, these light bulbs release 20 times the maximum acceptable
mercury concentration in the air.

It was very astounding how the majority of the British people were able to figure out the fact that its too absurd to kill
someone from the other side when your position is winning in all the surveys, independent or otherwise.

Consequently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency created an emergency protocol you need to follow in the event of
a bulb breakage, due to the poison gas that is released.

Moreover, these light bulbs have a number of negative effects for our health, including:

Anxiety

Fatigue

Migraines

Cluster headaches

Dizziness

Seizures

Inability to concentrate

Here are some more reasons to avoid these light bulbs and go back to incandescent bulbs.

Energy Saving Bulbs Contain Mercury

As previously stated, these energy- saving light bulbs contain mercury, which is a potent neurotoxin that is especially
dangerous to children and pregnant women. It is especially toxic to the brain, the nervous system, the liver and the kidneys,
and it can also damage the reproductive, cardiovascular and immune system. Furthermore, mercury can cause anxiety,
insomnia, memory loss, headaches, tremors, cancer and Alzheimers.

Energy Saving Light Bulbs Emit a Lot of UV Rays

It is generally recognized that UV-radiation is harmful for the eyes and the skin, as it can lead to skin cancer. These energy
saving lamps emit UV-B and traces of UV-C radiation.

This radiation directly attacks the immune system, and furthermore damages the skin tissues enough to prevent the proper
formation of vitamin D-3.

Energy Saving Bulbs Can Cause Cancer

The study by Peter Braun at Berlin Germanys Alab Laboratory discovered that these light bulbs contain poisonous
carcinogens that could cause cancer, such as:

Naphthalene, a volatile white crystalline compound, produced by the distillation of coal tar, used in mothballs and
as a raw material for chemical manufacture.

Styrene, an unsaturated liquid hydrocarbon, obtained as a petroleum byproduct.

Phenol, a mildly acidic toxic white crystalline solid, obtained from coal tar and used in chemical manufacture.
Hence, apart from the saving in energy and finances, these light bulbs pose serious health risks. Therefore, it
would be wise to change back to regular incandescent bulbs, but be careful in doing so as well- since if one
happens to break, the dangers are so severe.

The Environmental Protection Agency has laid out a very detailed protocol to deal with the mercury and cancer-causing
chemicals in these cases, which suggests as follows:
In the event of a bulb breakage, due to the poison gas that is released, you should follow this emergency procedure.
Before Cleanup

People and pets should leave the room.

Open a window or door to the outdoor environment to air out the room for 5-10 minutes

If you have a central forced air heating or air conditioning system, shut it off

Collect materials needed to clean up the broken bulb

Damp paper towels or disposable wet wipes (for hard surfaces)

A glass jar with a metal lid or a sealable plastic bag

Stiff paper or cardboard

Sticky tape

During Cleanup

Do not vacuum as it could spread mercury-containing powder or mercury vapor, unless broken glass remains after all
other cleanup steps have been taken.

Be thorough in collecting broken glass and visible powder, scoop up glass fragments and powder using stiff paper or
cardboard.

Pick up any remaining small glass fragments and powder with a sticky tape, such as duct tape. Place the used tape in the
glass jar or plastic bag.

Place cleanup materials in a sealable container.

After Cleanup
After cleanup, avoid leaving any bulb fragments or cleanup materials indoors, and promptly place all of them, including
vacuum cleaner bags, outdoors in a trash container or protected area until materials can be disposed of.

Moreover, check with your local government about disposal requirements in your area, and if there is no such requirement
in your area, you can dispose of the materials with your household trash. However, some localities require fluorescent bulbs
(broken or unbroken) be taken to a local recycling center.

Furthermore, you should continue to air out the room where the bulb was broken and leave the heating/air conditioning
system shut off for several hours afterwards.

Hydrogen Peroxide Or Soap And Water To Clean Your Wound? + Why You Should
Think Twice Before Using Antibacterial Soap
June 27 2016 | From: Mercola / StumbleUpon

Getting cuts and scrapes are common, both inside and outside your home. These openings in your
skin create an opportunity for bacterial growth and infections.

Initial cleaning of your wound will help to flush out unwanted bacteria and create an environment to help the open
area heal.

Most people either reach for the soap and water or hydrogen peroxide to clean the area before bandaging it. You'll want to
use the most effective cleaner without disturbing the tissue to encourage restoration of the area. One of these materials is
definitely better to use than the other.

Why Hydrogen Peroxide is an Excellent Option

Hydrogen peroxide has been used since the 1920s as an antiseptic because it is effective at killing bacteria. An antiseptic is
a substance that prevents the growth of disease-causing microorganisms, such as bacteria.

When you had a cut or scrape as a child, your mother probably reached for the brown bottle of hydrogen peroxide.
When she dabbed it on your cut, you may remember it hurt. That pain or discomfort was a result of the peroxide activating
pain receptors in your cut or scrape as it killed the bacteria in the area. It is far safer and more effective than rubbing
(isopropyl) alcohol than is commonly used and less staining than iodine.

Your Wound Needs Oxygen to Heal

Wound healing is a normal process your body initiates whether the wound is a paper cut or a large incision following
surgery. In all cases your cuts, scrapes and wounds will heal faster, better and with less scarring when there is plenty of
oxygen available.

The chemical composition of hydrogen peroxide is H2O2, containing one more oxygen molecule than water whose
composition is H2O. When hydrogen peroxide is put on a cut or scrape, you'll notice bubbling from the area as the hydrogen
peroxide releases one oxygen molecule and becomes water.

How Hydrogen Peroxide Kills Bacteria

Hydrogen peroxide works against bacteria, breaking the cell membranes open by attracting electrons. Inside the bacteria is
an enzyme called catalase, causing the fizzing you see when the hydrogen peroxide reacts with the enzyme and releases
one oxygen molecule.

Hydrogen peroxide is a very good antiseptic but it isn't able to distinguish between your healthy cells and those of the
bacteria in your wound. The peroxide will attract electrons from your healthy cell membranes, killing them, and react with the
catalase in your cells, producing the same fizzing.

Low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide are actually produced by your body after metabolizing sugar or carbohydrates,
promoting wound healing.

Your cells have catalase to inactivate the hydrogen peroxide produced inside the cells, but are powerless against the
hydrogen peroxide you add to your cut from the outside.
Excessive oxidative damage to your cells from external hydrogen peroxide will slow wound healing and increase your risk of
scar formation. Your cells use catalase to inactivate hydrogen peroxide produced by your body to oxygen and water after
insulin metabolizes sugar inside the cells.

This link between insulin, metabolized sugar, oxygenation and hydrogen peroxide produced by your body may be one
reason why individuals who have insulin-resistant diabetes heal more slowly.

Most clinicians today do not recommend using antiseptic solutions of any kind to clean a cut or wound for the same reason
hydrogen peroxide is not recommended. The antiseptic will often destroy your healthy cells, slow healing and increase your
risk of scar tissue formation.

However if you do need a powerful and effective antiseptic peroxide is my first choice as it is far safer than rubbing
(isopropyl) alcohol. I always travel with a spray bottle of peroxide as it is also useful for cleaning stains from clothes,
especially when used in conjunction with soap.

The Truth About Antibacterial Soap

Although the first patent for antibacterial soap was filed in 1984 by David Poshi and Peter Divone, it was Dial bar soap that
first made the claim in the 1940s. Dial didn't put "antibacterial" in their advertising, but advertised their soap as a way to get
your body "super clean" by killing bacteria and germs.

Dial used a chemical, hexachlorophene, an antibacterial agent now proven to cause brain damage in infants. In 1970, the
company was ordered to remove the chemical from their soap.

Once Poshi and Divone tested their chemical, triclosan, against bacteria and received the patent, Dial was the first to add it
to their products claiming it "killed germs on contact."

Today, antibacterial soaps contain the chemical triclosan, despite the mountains of research demonstrating negative health
concerns it triggers.
Antibacterial soap companies have mounted huge advertising campaigns, claiming the soaps would make your environment
safer and provide an extra layer of protection against illness.

In December 2013, after 40 years of study, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced they would revisit the
safety of triclosan, citing studies suggesting it can interfere with hormone levels in laboratory animals and increase the
growth of drug-resistant bacteria.

The concern voiced by the FDA that antibacterial soap would increase drug resistance in bacteria was made on December
16, 2013. Another statement, published just three days earlier by Colleen Rogers, Ph.D., lead microbiologist at the FDA,
indicated antibacterial soaps were not effective against bacteria:

"In fact, there currently is no evidence that over-the-counter (OTC) antibacterial soap products are any more
effective at preventing illness than washing with plain soap and water."

In either case, a decision by the FDA is expected to be released in September 2016 after a lawsuit was brought by the
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), in response to decades of delays by the FDA in ruling for or against triclosan
and other antibacterial substances.

Hazards of Triclosan

Triclosan is an antiseptic substance, and not recommended for cleaning cuts and scrapes because it prolongs wound
healing and increases your risk of scar formation. However, there are other reasons you don't want to use antibacterial
soaps in your home as well.

In June 2015, the agency responsible for oversight of chemical use in the European Union announced that triclosan would
be phased out of hygiene products because the risks of using the product outweighed any perceived benefits. Research has
linked the chemical substances used to make antibacterial soap with:
 Inhibition of aquatic bacteria and
Endocrine hormone disruption Increased cancer risk algae necessary for balanced
ecosystem

Increased allergies to Interference with muscle contraction

Antibiotic resistance
peanuts and hay fever and activity

Biomagnification of the fat-soluble product; it

Disrupted thyroid Disrupts thyroid hormone gene
appears at greater levels in tissue higher up the food
function expression
chain

Increased liver tumors in mice

How to Properly Wash Wounds

The best way to cleanse a cut, scrape or wound is with a safe, mild soap and plenty of water. Choose a soap without
triclosan, triclocarban or fragrance. Before washing your cut, wash your hands. This helps reduce the potential for
transferring bacteria from your hand to your wound.

Mild to moderate bleeding can occur while you're cleaning the wound. After cleaning, use direct pressure to stop the
bleeding and elevate the area above the level of your heart if you're able. This helps to reduce the amount of blood to the
area to help stop the bleeding.

Rinse your wound with water for five to 10 minutes. This helps to remove dirt and debris from the area. Cool water may feel
better to you than warm water, but either is acceptable to use. If you have a sprayer on your kitchen sink, you can try using it
to help clean the wound out.

After rinsing thoroughly for five to 10 minutes to remove dirt and debris, use a mild soap with a clean washcloth or piece of
gauze to wash the area. Use mild pressure. Hard scrubbing can disrupt the area and prolong healing time without any
added benefit to cleansing the area. Cover the area to keep it moist and clean. Wounds that are kept moist and don't scab
will heal better and are less likely to scar.
Why Silver Should be in Your Medicine Cabinet

The antimicrobial properties of silver have been known since 400 B.C., and silver was commonly used as an antimicrobial
agent in wound management until the early 20th century. Modern science has since confirmed silver's antimicrobial effects,
It's even been shown to be effective against antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Tests reveal that silver destabilizes the structure of the bacterial cell membrane, making it more porous, which allows the
silver to enter the bacteria and kill it from the inside.

Silver-containing hydrofiber dressing has been shown to offer effective protection against proliferation of a broad range of
aerobic, anaerobic and antibiotic-resistant microorganisms in wounds. Silver nanoparticles incorporated into a
thermosensitive gel has also been tested and found to be effective against Staphylococcus aureus.

A 2010 study also found colloidal silver effectively killed drug-resistant staph, E.coli, Salmonella, and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, the latter of which typically occurs in hospitals and in people with weakened immune systems. Considering the
risk of contracting a drug-resistant infection from a cut or scrape, it seems reasonable to conclude that keeping a bottle of
high quality silver in your medicine cabinet would be a prudent strategy, and to use it any time you get a cut, scrape or other
topical wound.

Tips to Speed Healing

Once cleaned, there are several things you can do to improve the speed of wound healing and reduce the potential for
scarring.

1. Honey

Honey was used to fight infection up until the early 20th century. However, the grade-A processed honey you find at the
grocery store is typically nothing more than high-fructose syrup and may actually increase your risk of infection. Instead, use
raw Manuka honey. This honey is produced by bees foraging on Manuka flowers and may be more effective than antibiotics
against some forms of bacteria.

2. Coconut Oil

Virgin coconut oil has dual benefits of keeping your skin moist and improving your fibroblast proliferation and wound healing.
Use only virgin coconut oil on the area twice daily.
3. DuoDERM

DuoDERM is a brand of hydrocolloid dressings covering the wound, protecting it from bacteria and keeping it moist to
improve healing time. They also reduce pain in the area while providing a protective covering.

4. Avoid smoking

Avoid smoking. Wound healing requires good blood supply and smoking reduces blood supply to your skin through
vasoconstriction, and smoking reduces your absorption of vitamin A, necessary for skin health and healing.

5. Nutrition

There are several choices you can make each day that will reduce your healing time and improve your overall health.

6. Beta-Carotene or Vitamin A

Foods high in vitamin A or beta-carotene are often orange-colored, such as sweet potatoes, carrots and winter squash. Do
not take a vitamin A supplement if you are pregnant, nursing or trying to get pregnant.

7. Vitamin C

Your body uses it to make collagen and form new tissue. It is water-soluble. You can take up to 3,000 milligrams (mg) per
day. Reduce the amount if you develop diarrhea.
Vitamin C interacts with some medications including chemotherapy, estrogen, warfarin and others. Check with your
pharmacist for known interactions if you are taking medication. Foods rich in vitamin C include citrus fruits, dark leafy
greens, broccoli and berries.

8. Zinc

Stimulates wound healing and can be used as an oral supplement in zinc lozenges or applied directly to the wound in a
cream form. Do NOT apply to open wounds and do not take a supplement long-term. Foods high in zinc include pumpkin
seeds, oysters, veal, beef, cashews and mushrooms.

9. B-Complex vitamins

May speed wound healing and improve skin health. Foods high in many of the B vitamins include spinach, broccoli, calf's
liver, lentils, parsley and bell peppers.

10. Bromelain

An enzyme found in pineapple may reduce swelling, bruising and improve healing time.

11. L-arginine

Has been used post-surgically to improve healing. Foods high in arginine include chocolate, peanuts, chicken, beef, lamb,
milk and cheese.

When to See Your Doctor

You may need to see a physician for treatment of a cut or wound, either immediately after injury or sometime later for an
infection. The following signs and symptoms typically require medical attention.

Your injury is
Your cut won't
very large and/or Dirt or debris embedded you can't remove
stop bleeding
very deep

Wound appears to be infected: green or yellow pus, red area around the wound
Injury to an Wound caused
is expanding, the skin around the wound looks "crinkled," the area around the
artery or deep by an animal or
wound is much warmer than the surrounding skin, and red lines appear to be
near a bone human bite
coming from the area.
Why You Should Think Twice Before Using Antibacterial Soap

If you're like millions of Westerners, you use antibacterial soaps or other products on a regular
basis. So do hospitals, doctor's offices, and many health care venues.

It's notable then that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced Apr. 30 that they may begin requiring extra
safety data on antibacterial hand soaps and sanitizers that are used in healthcare settings. Otherwise, the FDA
suggested that it may pull some products from the market.

Under the newly proposed rule, the agency would evaluate whether existing over-the-counter antibacterial soaps and gels
designed for clinical providers are "safe and effective" - specifically, ensuring that products don't cause birth defects or lead
to antibiotic resistant super germs. The move comes after some in the scientific and medical communities have expressed
concern about the risks of such items, especially for those who must use the products regularly.

"Today healthcare professionals use antiseptic products much more frequently than they used to, in some cases
up to 100 times per day," said Dr. Theresa Michele, FDA Director of the Division of Nonprescription Drug Products,
in the official release.

The agency said that it is "particularly interested in [...] the long-term safety of daily, repeated exposure to
[common] ingredients."

Sound familiar? That's because the FDA initiated a similar investigation into the general consumer versions of these
products in 2013. That study will conclude later this year.

Since the average person doesn't use antibacterial soaps or gels nearly as often as their doctor, should we be
concerned about the most recent FDA review?
Although I don't have a need to use antibacterial preparations as often as those working in clinical environments, I do want
the occasional satisfaction of a spritz of hand sanitizer.

I even feel good about it when I'm working in my other capacity in the special events industry, like I'm limiting my 'take home'
contact with the hundreds of individuals I interacted with during a given party. (And hopefully also limited my guests'
chances of catching a cold from their vicarious contact with everyone else through me.)

But is it good for our health? Or, in the FDA's parlance: Is my lower-than-clinical exposure level safe for in the long run?

According to Dr. Allison Aiello, the answer is clear: absolutely not.

"The potential risks definitely outweigh the benefits, which are none," said Aiello without equivocation to TIME
when asked recently about antiseptic soap use.

An epidemiologist at the Gillings School of Public Health at the University of North Carolina, Aiello has long crusaded
against these products, especially those containing the chemical triclosan.

About half of liquid hand soaps in the US, along with a whole slew of other products, contain antibacterial chemicals like
triclosan or triclocarban. In fact, it's hard to buy a household items like dish racks, toothpaste, hand soap, and even some
clothing (under than name Microban) without running into these antimicrobial and antibacterial pesticides.

This should be mildly alarming, considering the results of a 2007 study for which Aiello was a lead author. Her team
concludes:

"Several laboratory studies demonstrated evidence of triclosan-adapted cross-resistance to antibiotics among

different species of bacteria. [...]
 The lack of an additional health benefit associated with the use of triclosan-containing consumer soaps over
regular soap, coupled with laboratory data demonstrating a potential risk of selecting for drug resistance, warrants
further evaluation by governmental regulator regarding antibacterial product claims and advertising."

In other words, after systematically reviewing 27 studies of antiseptic soaps containing the active ingredient triclosan, Aiello
and her partners believe that some antibacterial soaps may be making antibiotic resistance super bugs.

(They also suggest that manufacturers like Dial and Softsoap may be fleecing consumers with inflated claims on their
products effectiveness in the process. But we'll come back to that later.)

This should give us pause in our household germ-killing spree. Globally, bacteria have become more resistant to
antimicrobials, according to the World Health Organization. So much so that the WHO said the problem "threatens the
achievements of modern medicine."To emphasis the point, in mid-May, the Centers for Disease Control warned of a strain
of typhoid that has become resistant to multiple antibiotics.

Given the impact that resistance can have on the success of medical treatments, perhaps we should lay off the hand
sanitizer. But that's not the only reason.

Some Antiseptic Soaps May Also Promote Tumors

A different study, released in Nov. 2014, found that triclosan promoted tumor growth. Researchers in San Diego exposed
mice to the pesticide and reported that mice grew "more tumors, bigger tumors and more frequent tumors" than those
rodents with no triclosan contact. They also pointed to liver scarring.

Study author Robert Tukey, professor of chemistry, biochemistry, and pharmacology at University of California, San Diego,
described the results as "on the extreme end of a tumor promoter and [triclosan] does so very rapidly." Similar to Aiello,
Tukey also notes that he would not personally use antibacterial products with triclosan.

Other reports imply that triclosan causes decreased thyroid hormone levels, as well as changing our ability to respond to
estrogen and testosterone.
But I Only Use Hand Sanitizer Occasionally, So My Exposure Level is TooLow to Worry About this,
Right?

Wrong.

Criticism of these animal studies often comes from those that claim that the rodents have been introduced to very high
concentrations of the chemical that don't adequately mimic hand washing. But what about tooth brushing, hair washing,
putting on exercise clothing, and handling your kitchen cutting board?

All of these products may contain triclosan or close variations of the antimicrobial pesticide, potentially leading to higher
exposure than anticipated. In fact, triclosan is the most ubiquitous consumer antibacterial. It's been found in 97 percent of
breast milk samples in the US as well as the urine of 75 percent of Americans over age six.

It also shows up commonly in the environment; it's one of the seven most frequently found compounds in US streams.

You Don't Have to Believe These Studies Though; You Can Read the FDA's Own
Recommendations on Antibacterial Soaps.

Surprisingly, the FDA isn't very supportive of antibacterial soaps either. An agency consumer update issued in Dec. 2013
identifies hormone disruption, antibiotic resistance, and other concerns for antiseptic products:

"[A]ntibacterial soap products contain chemical ingredients, such as triclosan and triclocarban, which may carry
unnecessary risks given that their benefits are unproven. [...]
 A large number of liquid soaps labeled 'antibacterial' contain triclosan, an ingredient of concern to many
environmental and industry groups. [...]

Moreover, recent data suggest that exposure to these active ingredients is higher than previously thought, raising
concerns about the potential risks associated with their use regularly and over time."

If this makes you wonder why any of these products are approved for sale at all, you're not alone. The European Union
banned triclosan from materials that come into contact with food in 2010. Minnesota banned the chemical completely last
year. But one only has to read the saga of Colgate's successful five year, multi-attempt process to get the FDA's blessing for
triclosan-containing Colgate Total to begin to see the problems with our regulatory system.

As ATTN: has discussed before, our regulators allow manufacturers to use untested chemicals on the public as a matter of
course. As a country, we "have created a system where we are testing these chemicals out on the human
population," says University of Massachusetts Amherst professor Thomas Zoeller.

"I love the idea they are all safe," Zoeller commented to the Chicago Tribune. "But when we have studies on animals that
suggest otherwise, I think we're taking a huge risk."

Given the Uncertainty, are Antibacterial Soaps Even Necessary?

You probably saw this coming. According to the FDA, antibacterial soaps are not any more effective than regular soap and
water.

The main difference between antimicrobial products and regular soap is that antimicrobials kill the bacteria outright via
additives, like pesticides or alcohol.

Meanwhile, plain soap works by helping to loosen the grip of bacteria on your hands as you scrub when following good hand
washing technique. Surprisingly, that's why washing with water alone - as long as you scrub - is also an effective way of
cleaning your hands.

That means that companies are fleecing us with more expensive, antimicrobial versions of regular products as well as
selling us products that we don't necessarily need: like alcohol-based hand sanitizers.
I like my CleanWell for times that I can't wash my hands. And since it doesn't have triclosan or other pesticides in it, that's
likely not a problem. But I'd be better to focus on washing my hands properly - going for a full 30 seconds of scrubbing
action - or on making sure my bar soap at home isn't sitting in a puddle of water that's causing it to get contaminated by
germs.

Making sure our soap is actually clean, and reminding ourselves that a little bacteria is fundamental to the formation of our
immune system, will go a lot further toward protecting our health than using antibacterial cleaners. It was also apparently
protect us more than the FDA, who has known for years that triclosan-containing products might be dangerous.

Are Nanoparticles Engineered Into GM Foods Causing Cancer?

June 26 2016 | From: WakingTimes

In modern agriculture, it is not possible to only spray weeds without spraying soy and corn crops.
Glyphosate is therefore genetically modified (GM) to kill only weeds while at the same time
enhancing the growth of crops.
However, glyphosate does not readily penetrate the leaves of weeds and crops, and therefore is mixed with
adjuvants that aid leaf penetration. For decades, nano particles (NPs) and specifically carbon nano tubes (CNTs)
that readily penetrate leaves have been used as adjuvants allowing glyphosate to be carried to plant roots for more
efficient absorption.

Related: Breast cancer survivor credits exercise and a raw food diet for her miraculous recovery

Upon human consumption of GM foods, most glyphosate and included NPs are rapidly excreted, but residues remain in the
human gut. Indeed, the important question of NPs in GM foods is the same as that of nanotechnology in general: Do NPs
contribute to the wide range of health problems?

Donald Huber, the prominent critic of GM foods claims soil-borne plant pathogens are produced that do indeed harm human
health, e.g., residents living close to sprayed GM soybeans fields in Argentina developed cancers and birth defects.

However, GM food proponents argue science is still looking for, but not found Hubers pathogen to establish the causal link
between glyphosate and human health problems.

Regardless, the question remains: Is there a causal link between NPs in GM foods and human health?

Background

In 2013, Waking Times published an article on how the food industry is poisoning the very consumers who drive their multi-
billion dollar enterprises, even spending millions against the consumers right to informed consent, i.e., truthful GMO
labeling.
Although a causal link between GM foods and cancer is not made, titanium dioxide NPs common in GM food are cited to
proliferate epithelial cells of the gut and induce tumor-like changes common to cancer.

The Problem

Today, the problem is the effect of GM foods on human health is focused almost entirely on arguments as to whether
Hubers pathogen exists, instead of identifying the mechanism by which residues of NPs in glyphosate cause cancer by
damaging human DNA. Only then would a causal link between GM foods and human health be biologically plausible.

Proposal

The causal link between ingested GM foods and human health is proposed to be the DNA damage by UV radiation from
NPs in glyphosate residues in the gut. Today, only UV radiation from the sun on exposed human skin is known to cause
cancer, but the gut is hidden from solar UV.

How then do NPs in GM food produce UV radiation?

Currently, damage to human DNA by UV radiation from NPs has not been recognized because classical physics always
allows the atoms in NP to have the heat capacity to conserve heat from the gut by a slight increase in temperature, a
consequence with insignificant DNA damage.

Hence, DNA is now thought damaged upon direct contact with the NP material, but this notion can be dismissed as
chemically inert NPs are also known to damage the DNA.
Quantum mechanics (QM) differs from classical physics by allowing electromagnetic (EM) radiation to be created in NPs.
Unlike classical physics, QM requires the atoms in NPs to have vanishing heat capacity and therefore NP temperatures
cannot increase upon absorbing heat in the gut.

Instead, the NPs conserve heat by emitting EM radiation that causes the DNA damage, and if not repaired may lead to
cancer. Similarity is found with ovarian cancer from NPs in talcum powder products used in cleaning genital areas.

Discussion

Vanishing heat capacity of the atom by QM is not new, but the consequence of the Planck law was formulated over a
century ago. For heat capacity to vanish, however, the NP must be placed under high EM confinement, but the NP does not
provide any physical is not physical confinement. Instead, NPs having high surface-to-volume ratios require absorbed heat
to be momentarily confined to their surface thereby providing high EM confinement over nanoscale dimensions.

Since the NP temperature cannot increase by QM, conservation proceeds by quantum electrodynamics (QED) converting
the surface heat into EM waves standing between diametrically opposite NP surfaces. QED stands for quantum
electrodynamics.

But QED here differs from the complex light-matter interaction theory advanced by Feynman and others. Simply stated:

Absent heat capacity, heat supplied to a NP of diameter d is conserved by creating standing EM waves having
half-wavelength / 2 = n d, where n is the NP refractive inde

x. Once the surface heat is expended in forming the standing waves, the EM confinement vanishes allowing the
NP to emit EM radiation that damages the DNA of adjacent cells, e.g., zinc oxide NPs having diameter d = 50 nm
and n = 2.5 emit UV-C radiation at about 254 nm, a lethal level for the DNA damage in all living systems as the
pyrimidine dimers are formed that block DNA replication. Smaller NPs emit even higher frequency EM radiation.
See diverse QED applications at, Ibid, 2010 2016."

Conclusion
Hubers pathogen that links GM foods to human health is unlikely to exist as the problems (cancer, autism, birth defects,
Parkinsons, etc.) are widely diverse and cannot be linked to any single pathogen.

Indeed, the diversity of health problems suggests the presence of many different pathogens as the mechanism for their
creation is the scrambling of genes from damaged DNA.

The causal link between NPs in GM food and health problems is clearly the UV radiation emitted by NPs.

To protect consumers, DNA damage tests, say comet assays, should be performed on GM foods and safe concentrations of
NPs labelled accordingly.

Related: Top 10 ways food is being used RIGHT NOW as a chemical delivery system to poison brains

Cures, Health & Wellbeing

Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

 Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/health-wellbeing-6.shtml

Another Big-Screen Movie Just Released Investigates Vaccines For Autism

Implications
June 24 2016 | From: ActivistPost

Hot on the heels of the CDC-whistleblower and vaccine-fraud-documentary VAXXED, a new

feature length film Man Made Epidemic made its debut in London (UK) at the Curzon Cinema
in Soho on Thursday, June 16, 2016!

Kudos go to the producer, filmmaker Natalie Beers, and other production crew members for taking on such an
overwhelming project, which took two years to complete.

Congratulations and thanks for having the fortitude to work on a much-needed investigation of vaccines, vaccinations and
environmental issues relative to ever-increasing autism, also must be given to Lothar Moll, Executive Producer; Lucy
Martens, Director of Photography; Simon Modery, Editor; and David Hason, Music Composer.

According to the movies webpage:

 Filmmaker Natalie Beer sets off on a journey around the world speaking to leading doctors, scientists and families
to find out the truth about the autism epidemic and whether or not vaccines have a role to play.

The film explores the common misconception that autism is solely genetic and looks into scientists concerns over
recent years about environmental factors such as medication and pesticides which continue to leave our children
with physical and neurological damage."

Ask your local movie theater to show Man Made Epidemic on their movie screens as soon as possible, since it will be an
excellent cinematic companion to VAXXED thereby putting much needed pressure on the U.S. HHS, CDC, FDA, the World
Health Organization, and others who indiscriminately push vaccines based upon fraudulent, consensus vaccine
pseudoscience!

Fraudulent is not to be used lightly, as there are various incidences that have exposed fraud:

1. The Simpsonwood Meeting in June 2000 to rework the CDC epidemiologist Verstraetens finding that vaccines
cause autism. Heres the transcript of that infamous clandestine meeting.

2. Two Merck & Company employee whistleblowers lawsuit in federal court in Philadelphia, PA, regarding
Mercks fudging for ten years the efficacy ratings of the mumps active in its MMR vaccine. Heres The Wall Street
Journals report on that.

3. CDC epidemiologist-whistleblower William Thompson, PhD, proved that the CDC trashed documented study
evidence that the MMR vaccine caused autism in young black boys less than three years of age, and handed over
copies of those trashed documents to a member of the U.S. Congress asking for a congressional
investigation, which has not happened YET. The movie VAXXED documents that embarrassing, conniving and
fraudulent vaccine science story.
Probably NOTHING explains more why there should be an investigation into vaccines and vaccinology science than the
candid remarks made by the father of American vaccines, Dr Maurice Hilleman, MD, the Merck & Company head vaccine
maker for years, discussing on video the very real problems with vaccines, their growth mediums - animals and their
tissues, cancer viruses, etc.

However, now we have to factor in, since Hillemans time, newly-added neurotoxic chemicals and nanoparticles [3]. See Dr
Hillemans nonchalant disclosure, plus how cavalierly colleagues treated the information, to realize why you really have to
question vaccine ingredients.

Related Articles
There is literally so much information coming out about the truth relating to vaccines nowadays that we literally
cannot keep up with it all. There is simply no room for denial unless one is retarded. And quite possibly from
vaccination.

JUST LOOK AT IT ALL!

Countries with highest vaccination rates have highest infant mortality rates, too

Franklin doctor refuses to administer vaccines

Tennessee Medical Office Stops Vaccines Because They Cause Autism

Tennessee doctor could lose license after announcing office will no longer vaccinate due to autism concerns

Vaccinations Are Injecting Parasites Into Our Children

The Shocking Lack of Evidence Supporting Flu Vaccines

Top 9 vaccines you NEVER need and exactly why the CDC has to scare everybody into getting them

The top 7 strangest, literally mind-blowing vaccine ingredients

Confirmed: Renowned Physician Jeff Bradstreet Who Linked Vaccines to Autism Was Murdered

De Niro Autism film affair: What the media is not reporting

What's in that vaccine?

Vaccine mandates are NOT about vaccines... the state wants to OWN your body!

Robert De Niro to Produce Documentary Exposing Corruption Within the Vaccine Industry

Three new vaccine science videos released by the Health Ranger: Discover medical school 'obedience training' by
the vaccine industry and more...
Vaccines: The awful truth

How to naturally detox from mandatory vaccine injections forced upon you by the medical police state

CFR: Unvaccinated are Healthier than Vaccinated Populations

American College of Pediatricians warns about toxic effects of Gardasil vaccine; sounds alarm over massive
scientific fraud that concealed toxic effects

Learning about vaccine dangers the hard way

You Need to Watch This Before Getting Your Baby Vaccinated!

Author Of Mandatory Meningitis Vaccine Bill Caught Taking $420k From Big Pharma

Studies Prove Without Doubt That Unvaccinated Children Are Far Healthier Than Their Vaccinated Peers

Donald Trump issues warning on the relation between autism and vaccines

New Australian law allows forced vaccinations, quarantine or jail to prevent the spread of disease

The Vaccinated children are carriers of live viruses that they were injected with, could shed the virus to others

Toxic Phenol Ingredient in Vaccines

10 shocking reasons why Zika virus fear is another fraudulent medical hoax and vaccine industry funding scam

The most shocking & damming interview I have watched regarding vaccine injuryInterview with Dr. Judy Mikovits,
PhD
A Shot Never Worth Taking: The Flu Vaccine ~ by Kelly Brogan, MD

Effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccines

Mercks Former Doctor Predicts that Gardasil will Become the Greatest Medical Scandal of All Time

Top Five Videos to Watch Before You Get Your Flu Shot

UK government admits swine flu vaccine causes brain damage, awards compensation to 60 families

Teenage girl dies five days after receiving HPV vaccine jab

Italian Court Rules Mercury And Aluminum In Vaccines Cause Autism: US Media Continues Total Blackout Of
Medical Truth

The Dose Makes the Poison: Rethinking Traditional Toxicity Testing

Vaccines Now Mandatory in California - Strict Penalties for ANYONE Who Refuses

Vaccine Deception Video Collection

Big Pharmas Dirty Little Secret: Vaccine-Induced Autoimmune Injury

Immunise your children

Antibodies AFTER vaccines do NOT mean immunity

Polly Gillespie - when truth matters

Animal Communication + The Latest Study On Human-Pet Bonding Says You May Be
Under A Spell
June 20 2016 | From: ZenGardner / GreenMedInfo

Moments before I was told to sit down and watch How Diablo Became Spirit I was outside looking
over a stable door at a polo pony called Punk. He and I had never met before but I knew he was in
because he was injured.

In my thoughts I said Hi Punk, how you feeling?. He looked up from his hay and I heard him say back to me in my
thoughts Much better thank you, I was gob-smacked.

I moved to the next stable door where my old friend a chestnut mare called Penny was stabled and again in my head said
Hi Penny, how are you?. Hungry as always she replied.

I walked back to my thatched cottage opposite the stables thinking to myself, Im not going to tell anyone that just happened.
When I walked into the cottage, my partner at that time said to me Baby, sit down, I want you to watch something. I think
Ive found your calling. it was Anna Breytenbach (www.animalspirit.org) communicating telepathically with the
magnificent Black Leopard called Diablo.

I wept all the way through the video and told Matt what had just happened with the two horses. I then went online to find the
next Animal Communication workshop I could get on. Six weeks later I attending my first workshop.

I have always preferred the company of animals to humans, its just the way I am. Of course I now understand that humans
are animals too, though my animal friends are way less complicated and much more easily pleased.

To realize that which cannot be lost, it is necessary to understand what really has been lost..
 - Riane Eisler Sacred Pleasure.

On an Animal Communication workshop it is explained that everyone can communicate with animals, we have all just
forgotten how. They teach you that interspecies communication is done via energy so language is never a barrier.
Sometimes they will communicate through words, or sensation, or through images displayed in your mind.

Try not to want it too much because that can block you and do not discount any answer you get, practice trust in the first
answer you receive, and you must think out of the box because there isnt one except the one you or society puts you in.

You are taught the teachers method which in this case was firstly close your eyes and ground yourself, move your
consciousness into your heart area and think about how much you love animals, feeling the space in your heart centre
expanding with love.

Then, imagine that from your heart you are beaming over love to the animals heart and introduce yourself. Tell them how
much you love them and ask them if would they like to communicate with you. And remember to say please and thank you,
animals apprectiate good manners.

Anna Breytenbach

So, the only way to learn this skill is from a guest teacher. My animal guest teacher was a Staffordshire Bullterrier called
Oscar. He came into a calm room of thirty seated students, all eager to be able to communicate with this beautiful creature.

Being a Staffy Oscar entered the room with typical Staffy exuberance, we had all been instructed not to speak to or touch
him. His guardian (not owner, we are merely guardians to our pets) sat on a seat next to the teacher, whilst Oscar went
around the room sniffing everybody, tail wagging.

He then went and settled on the rug in the middle of the room. The teacher had already written down the questions on a flip
chart we were to ask Oscar telepathically, so she went through each question saying Ask Oscar who his best friend is and
then we were to write on our notepads the first answer we received.

Ask Oscar to show you where he went for a walk this morning, and who did he meet?. Then, Ask Oscar where he slept
last night and why?. Finally, Is there anything you need Oscar that will make your life better?.

I got two out of the four questions asked correct according to the answers the teacher received. She went through all the
answers everybody got and then shared the answers that she had received. When we asked what did Oscar need to make
his life better I heard him say Bones, I need bones!
The teacher and I got the same answer but his guardian protested I cant give him bones, hes a Staffy and he may get
splinters.

I found myself protesting this statement aloud, dogs produce 20% stronger hydrocholic acid in their guts to digest bone,
sinew, fur, fat and meat whilst on the move, it is imperative they have raw bones. Oscar got up from his rug and came over
to me wagging his tail and put his head in my lap, saying thank you.

Later that day I was partnered up for another exercise with a young woman who also lived with Oscar, who had been
accompanied by him in bed the night previous. When we asked the question Where did you sleep last night and why?

I heard something completely different to everyone else including the teacher, essentially getting the answer incorrect.

I asked her, when you went to bed last night with Oscar, how were you feeling? She responded exactly how Oscar had told
me She was feeling really sad and lonely. From that moment on I knew that animal communication is subjective.

The afternoon consisted of a cat guest teacher called Marmalade who headed straight for a woman who was terrified of cats
and sat on her for the rest of his session, attempting to cure her of her fear. Sadly, his efforts were lost. We did the same
routine, asking Marmalade questions that his guardian could verify.
Afterwards, we worked with photographs of our beloved pets. How does that even work? Surely that is not possible but I
found myself communicating perfectly accurately with Shoshy the cat via her photograph, using language that was
completely alien to my usual syntax. It was a bizarre experience!

After my workshop Id already got a few animals booked in for communication sessions. My first was a Hunter horse named
Nick who was having problems with repetitive lameness. I told the guardian not to tell me which leg was affected as asking a
question that can be confirmed by them is evidence to you and them that you are indeed in interspecies communication.

I approached the huge beast in silence, telepathically announcing my name and that Id just learned to communicate with
animals and I would like to communicate with him. I heard nothing. Then after a moment, he drew my attention to his back
left foot. I asked him did it hurt and suddenly I had a stabbing pain in my left foot on the underneath.

He then said The injections dont help, I need glucosomine! When I spoke to his guardian her mouth dropped open and
confirmed it was that foot that was problematic and she had been advised by the vet to have costly and painful steroid
injections, of which hed had four. I am happy to report Nick is now on glucosomine supplements and his problem is now
relieved.
The next communication was with a dressage horse called Zodie. Her guardian is a gentle, beautiful young woman who
teaches children to ride and does dressage competitions for fun. I like this person a lot and she is very fond of her animals.
The evening before I had read from cover to cover, the book my teacher had written on animal communication.

She wrote about an experience she had with horses where one horse had remembered how kind a human once was to him
that had given him some confectionary called Maltesers, and that hed never forgotten her kindness or the sweets. I went
armed with some Maltesers, just in case I could bribe the horse into communicating with me.

Her guardian told me when she and Zodie praticed dressage the horse was infallible but whenever they were in competetive
situations the horse had awful meltdowns. Off I went to communicate with Zodie who was in an enclosure with two other
horses where she was able to roam free and the others were stabled.

I entered their enclosure and introduced myself telepathically to Zodie, asking if she would like to communicate with me. She
took one look at me and promptly walked off and hid in a stable! That was a definite no then. Oh well, I may as well dish out
the Maltesers whilst Im here, so I pulled out the packet from my pocket and opened it in readiness to give to the other
horses.
Zodie popped her head out the stable inquisitively, and decided to come over and investigate the rustle of the sweet
wrapper. It turned out that she didnt like the Maltesers but that was enough effort on my part for her to give me another
chance and decided she would like to communicate with me after all.

I asked Zodie if she hurt anywhere and she showed me in my body a sensation of tightness on her right side flank and down
the leg. I then asked her what was going wrong in her competions? I was immediately overwhelmed by the sensation of fear
and nervousness, I was trembling all over and not able to catch my breath.

She told me I just dont want to let her down, shes an angel and I dont feel I am good enough! I explained that Vicks just
wanted to do the competitions for fun, it did not matter whether they won or not, they are just there to enjoy themselves.
When I told Vicks she wept, as did I. Ever since then, Zodie has been winning every competition she has entered and Vicks
younger sister is now successfully showjumping her too.

Animals are our greatest teachers in every way, when I have found it impossible to communicate they patiently show me
how. I have predominantly had dogs and horses in my life. Dogs are my greatest love and proved the most difficult for me to
access telepathically. But they always patiently teach me what I need to learn.

For me at least, it works better most times if I communicate with dogs through images. For example, Terry the Terrier was
my best animal friend when I learned this amazing skill, but I could not communicate in the ways I found so easy with cats,
horses, even insects! Eventually, this recalcitrant lump of clay finally grasped the concept of visualisation communication
thanks to Terrys guidance.

I was feeling very sorry for myself with my female cycle one day, and I knew that animals are able to heal us. So I was lying
on my bed in agony with Terry looking at me curiously. I said telepathically Terry come and lie on my belly it really
hurts. Nothing. Then I closed my eyes and imagined (or I- magiced) Terry lying on my belly facing me, and imagined what
that would look like from his perspective.

He jumped up on the bed and lay down on my body facing me. Within minutes my pain had subsided and I had learned my
biggest lesson so far. On another similar painful occasion I was cat-sitting and up in the middle of the night. I explained to
one of the cats I was in pain and she promptly jumped on my lap and starting pawing at my belly arduously. The pain was
cured in a matter of minutes.

One day I was told about a position at an Aristocrats country estate which was a live in job and my role would be to take
care of their five dogs, my dream job! I went to the 4,000 acre estate for an interview and met the Countess and her
daughter and the five dogs.

The dogs were really hectic with very few manners but all completely adorable. I was asked to sit down at the kitchen table
and have coffee with my prospective new boss. I suddenly was drawn to looking behind me and saw the tiny Jack Russell
Terrier who was sat staring at me next to the warm aga oven.

Telepathically I said to her Hello, I might be coming to live here to look after you, and I can talk to you.

Her eyes grew wide and her jaw slackened with shock. I invited her to come and sit on my lap which she did her guardians
could not believe what was happening because Lunch the Terrier never sat on just any old persons lap, so I got the job.
The pack consisted of one Golden Retriever called Wussie who was a healer, two highly strung Hungarian Vizlas, a mother
and daughter Mabel & Maudie.

Lunch, and a rescued Dog de Bordeaux named Winnifred a motley crew, all ruled magnanimously by Lunch of course, her
being the smallest of the pack, its always the smallest one in charge.

On many occasions I would walk another three dogs with the pack, just me and eight dogs spending whole days outside
connecting with each other, and all in connection with the Planetary Animal Mother, Gaia Sophia.
I have even communicated with plants. I got badly stung by some stinging nettles and know the best antidote is to eat the
very top of the nettle. I stood before a large group of nettles and asked them which nettle top I could take to cure my rash.

After a brief wait, and with no breeze whatsoever, one of the plants bowed down where the others stayed perfectly still.

I make hedgerow medicines and if I cannot find the plant that I need I will ask to be taken to it. When I collect the plants and
harvest them I talk to them in gratitude and explain to them who the medicine is for and what ailments they will be
addressing. It is a wonderful feeling to heal somebody, and even more sublime to be in such deep connection with nature.

Often one finds that some animals are more open to telepathy with human animals than others. No wonder when animals
are so used to us thinking they are just dumb beasts, often treating them badly either through ignorance or patent cruelty.
One such animal was a beautiful bay horse named Campbell.

He was unfortunate enough to have a groom who was very ignorant and cruel, be his guardian. She was the live-in groom
where I lived and supposedly looked after twelve horses. Dear, sweet Campbell, was always fielded alone which is a dire
way for herd animals to exist. He had no grass, no shade, no friends and I often found he had no water.

Ive always been able to feel how animals feel which intensified ten fold when I learned to communicate with them.
I would go and see Campbell every day and his loneliness was palpable. I would try my best to be nice and gently convince
the groom he needed more in his life but was always met with a brick wall of obtuse indifference.

The weather became unusually hot for English summertime that year and Campbell consistently had no water. One
afternoon I found him in a different paddock next to two mares who were both in season, again with no shade and no water.

He was covered in horseflies and horsefly bites and reacting manically to them and the mares hormones. I entered the
paddock, and with nostrils flaring and making a strange and unfamiliar equine noise, he rushed towards me and literally
buried his face in my torso for solace, remaining there for the next 10 minutes. I was covered in his blood from his bites.
Utterly heartbreaking.

I text the groom telling her what had happened and she replied in her usual disparraging manner, she knew what she was
doing and she was sick of me interfering but the worst part was she said I cant give him anymore water because he will get
colic.

Not having access to fresh water is what gives horses colic. I printed some information about colic prevention from the Blue
Cross website and handed it to her. For one week Campbell had water every day and was wearing a fly protection rug and
mask.

The following week however, back in his lonely field on a day when the temperatures were soaring, I found Campbell once
again without any water.
He had two empty buckets that I had filled the day before, changing one of the buckets to a different colour so that the
groom would know I had done it, and Id be able to verify whether she had refilled or not. It was 9 30pm, almost 24 hours
since and hed had any water.

I was very tired having worked all day and his field was half a mile away from my cottage. Campbell, do you need me to
fetch you some water? I asked telepathically. I will never forget his response he put his head in one empty bucket and
looked at me, then he did the same with the other bucket and looked at me.

Actions do indeed speak louder than words. I ferried 15 litres of water over to his field in a wheelbarrow of which he drank 5
litres straight away.

As I left him now hydrated I heard him say Thank you, I love you. Sadly I wasnt able to continue living amongst all those
wonderful creatures because I could not endure the abject neglect and cruelty any longer. I hope Campbell and all the
others have gone on to a better home or at least ended up with more competant caretakers.

This is the only downside to communicating with animals.

I have helped a dog who was so terrified of fireworks hed try to claw his way through walls. A horse who was scared of
going to an Elite English School where spolied children can keep their horses at school. A cat that was peeing in the
house

I attended another two day workshop with the same teacher, day two was focussing on Gestalt Therapy and Remote
Viewing which is basically learning to communicate and heal from long distance. Day two was Remote Viewing, so to learn
we were partnered up with someone new to us that weekend and told to swap our pet photographs.

The object of the exercise was, with permission of the other person, to access their house by communicating with their pet
through the photograph. I was handed a photograph of a really pissed off looking Persian Blue cat called Basil, his
expression was hilarious so I burst out laughing and looked at Basils guardian who simply said I know.

Not quite believing I or anyone could do such a thing, I nevertheless introduced myself to Basil and asked him to show me
around his house. We were encouraged to draw any images we saw or write down any words we received.

Suddenly I can see a kitchen, with a catflap in a pvc back door.

Then I find myself travelling through the catflap into the garden where I can see a beige coloured paving slab path
separating two lawns, and a wooden shed to the left with a tall wooden fence surrounding the modest garden.

Basil told me I dont like to go further than the fence.

Then we go back through the catflap and into the kitchen where he shows me not only the food he eats but the two different
brands of food he gets fed, and his silver bowl. His favourite place to sleep in the kitchen is a beige chair, and then he takes
me upstairs to the windowsill where he likes to sit and watch the world go by. Before I left the house he told me something
about his guardians with a request attached.

I find myself showing a complete stranger the sketch I had drawn of her own house and garden. To our mutual amazement I
was 100% accurate! She told me Basil had been rescued with another cat and they were both house cats until the other cat
had died. Since that day, Basil had been wandering out into the garden but never further than the fence.

She confirmed his food, the brands, his favourite place to sleep and his spot on the windowsill. We were both utterly
flabbergasted. Then, feeling rather awkward I asked her what Basil had told me to say Do you listen to BBC Radio 4?. Oh
yes, we listen to it all the time she replied.

Well Basil says he hates it and has asked me to ask you to please turn it off!
I will add here, the animal communicators all explain that the reason we are able to use photographs to communicate is a
Quantam Physics factor. I believe Quantam Physics is yet another scientific fraud we have been force fed, so I have no idea
how communication through that medium works, just that it does.

On the same workshop I was partnered with a woman who gave me a photograph of her dead dog. I was able to ask and
answer her four confirmation questions accurately, and then put her mind at rest that she had done the right thing in putting
her beloved pet to sleep at the time that she did.

They also say delightful things like our departed loved ones come with us on walks and watch over us. Now I am aware of
that idea I can feel their presence.

I was asked to communicate with a new horse at a livery stable, she had got into the habit of throwing the boss off every
time he rode her. They had renamed her Gigi so my first question to her was Do you like your new name?. No, I want to
be called Butercup! And I want a purple rug.
Then I asked if she was in pain and she showed me in my own body points that hurt her, which I sketched on a piece of
paper. She also told me her saddle was very uncomfortable. When I left her stable one of the grooms who I had not met
before, came over and asked me if I had been able to communicate.

She then started to tell me where she thought the horse was in pain and my sketch matched exactly with her assertions. I
told Tom my findings and he was really unhappy with her name choice, but admitted the saddle they used was not one that
had been specifically made for her. And he would change her rug to a purple one.

Buttercup has now had the physical therapy she needed to help her ailments and has a new saddle especially fitted for her
back, and has managed to keep Tom off the floor.

Anyone can learn to communicate with animals. Just think why does your dog know you are thinking about taking them for a
walk almost before you have even formulated the thought?
But animal communication is right-hemisphere brain activity, understanding that the education system is a deliberate
attempt to make you entirely left-hemisphered, will assist you enormously.

Attending one of the many workshops on offer will be the start of your intraspecies communication and a new way of looking
at all life and nature, even the planet we live on.

According to the ancient Pagan Mysteries, and the biography of the earth recovered from the Nag Hammadhi Codices by
modern day Gnostic John Lamb Lash, Gaia Sophia is a living conscious being, our Planetary Animal Mother, who can
communicate with you too.

The human animal is wired to Gaia, literally and spiritually.

The Latest Study On Human - Pet Bonding Says You May Be Under A Spell

Do you melt when you look into your dogs eyes? Does your cat have you wrapped around her
little fuzzy paws? Youre not alone! New science unlocks the mysteries of human-animal bonding
and how our animal companions manipulate us into loving them - for our good and theirs.
People have a long history of living and bonding with domesticated animals. A recent genome study concluded
that dogs may have been domesticated as far back as 34,000 years ago.

Today, our animal companions are as beloved as ever with the American pet population expanding from about 40 million
cats and dogs in 1967 to more than 114 million in 2012. Roughly two-thirds of US households now include at least one pet.

Not only are pets on the rise, but the significance of our human-animal relationships seems to be deepening. A growing
number of young adults are trading in their human partners for the four-legged kind. Many report experiencing greater
distress from the loss of a pet than from a breakup. In a recent poll, a surprising 38 percent of dog owners reported loving
their pets more than their partners!

Our animal companions obviously bring lightness and joy to our lives, but science now reveals they may be bringing much
more.

The Magical Healing Powers of Animals

In addition to offering companionship, animals benefit people in a number of different ways. For example, animals have
developed special defenses over the millennia to ensure survival in the wild, and some of these have benefits for
humankind.

Dog saliva has been found to heal wounds due to a protein called Nerve Growth Factor. Human wounds treated with NGF
heal twice as quickly as untreated wounds.

The purring of a cat can help mend broken bones and soft tissue injuries because they purr at 20 to 50 Hertz, a frequency
range found to promote tissue healing. And a protein from the venom of the Malayan pit viper is being used in Europe to
treat strokes and blood clots.
Even if you dont own anything as exotic as a Malayan pit viper, your dog or cat may be bringing you an abundance of gifts.

Science shows that pet owners are reaping an amazing number of health benefits, including the following:

Reduced risk for heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular disease, and better odds of surviving and recovering
from a heart attack, regardless of the severity

Better physical fitness and higher levels of activity, overall

Improved stress management and coping, reduced risk for depression and anxiety; lower levels of cortisol, and
higher levels of feel good neurotransmitters, including dopamine and serotonin

Less pain and improved quality of life for those suffering from fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, cancer and
other conditions

Fewer allergies, better immune function, and improved health and longevity

Higher attractiveness and trustworthiness to others, more social support and reduced isolation

Early warnings for seizures, cancer, low blood sugar and even death, as animals have sensory abilities reaching
far beyond those of humans, making them excellent service companions

Pets Reduce Allergies and Help Build Childrens EQ

For children, family pets offer unique benefits, both physically and emotionally. Dogs can forestall the development of
allergies in children raised with them. A study in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology found exposure to dogs in
infancy, especially around the time of birth, can lower a childs risk for allergies.
This effect is so strong that even an expectant mother can reduce the likelihood of her childs developing allergies by living
with a dog.

The emotional benefits are even more profound. Kids who grow up with dogs and cats tend to show greater compassion
and empathy, which is referred to as emotional intelligence or EQ.

According to kindergarten teachers, EQ is the strongest predictor of a childs success in school, even more so than reading
or writing skills. Caring for a pet teaches children compassion, self-esteem, and responsibility for the care of another, as well
as improving cognitive skills, mitigating stress, and numerous other benefits.

Children with autism are sometimes better able to interact with animals, and this may actually improve their ability to
interact with people. Science shows cats are especially helpful to autistic children, increasing their social interactivity and
improving communication skills, tactile and eye contact, smiling and laughter.

Oxytocin Creates Friends with Benefits

Why do cats and dogs hold this almost-magical power over humans? Recent discoveries are beginning to provide an
answer: hormones.

A recent groundbreaking study was the first to identify a hormonal bonding effect between humans and other species, which
may help to explain how dogs became domesticated thousands of years ago.

According to the study, when your dog looks into your eyes, he activates the same hormonal response as an infant. The
mutual gazing between dogs and their owners triggers the release of oxytocin, the love hormone, in the same positive
feedback loop as in a mother and newborn.
Of the duos who spent the greatest amount of time gazing into each others eyes, male as well as female dogs experienced
a 130 percent rise in oxytocin levels, and both male and female owners showed a 300 percent increase.

Produced by the hypothalamus, oxytocin is the hormone responsible for mother-infant bonding, flooding each with feelings
of happiness, trust and well being. In addition to its role in bonding and relationships, oxytocin confers physical health
benefits as well, including reduced pain and inflammation, which could explain some of the health benefits of pet ownership
outlined above.

But oxytocin may explain only part of our connection with dogs. A prior study found dogs to be sensitive to human social
cues, such as the intention to interact with them when making eye contact. According to Medical Daily:

"Dogs tend to speak through body language and facial expression, which makes them better equipped to figure out
our moods and what makes us happy, among other things.

Dogs are not the only species casting oxytocin spells on humans - cats are taking full advantage as well."

Crazy Cat Ladies May Not Be So Crazy After All

A recent study found that cats attach to humans as social partners, not just for the sake of obtaining food. This research is
the first to show in detail that cat-human relationships are essentially identical to human-human ones, at least biochemically,
with cats frequently stepping into roles of surrogate children in nurturing homes. This of course will not be new information to
cat lovers.

Petting a cat is found to produce an immediate oxytocin release in both cat and human - but if that human is a woman, the
effects may be far more pronounced. This study and others confirm that, while cats have plenty of male admirers, women
initiate contact with their kitties much more often than men, and vice versa.

Female owners also have more intense relationships with their cats, and cats especially adore - and manipulate - their
ladies. Cats are cashing in on human maternal instinct!
Rather than an amusing eccentricity, crazy cat ladies may actually be unwitting victims of chemically modulated feline
manipulation. Ill leave proof of that hypothesis to the scientists - but ladies, consider yourself warned.

Regardless of whether or not we humans are being manipulated by our animal friends, the benefits of sharing our homes
with them cannot be denied. Science has proven that if you want to live a longer, healthier, happier life - and raise your
children in an environment that cultivates compassion and responsibility - then adopting a pet may be just the prescription.

Tribal Parenting How To Heal Our Children + What Are The Consequences Of A
Childhood Removed From Nature?
June 18 2016 | From: KellyBroganMD / PlayAgain

Do you wear your baby? Nurse your toddler? Sleep in a family bed? If you do, chances are youve
been influenced by an obscure little book penned almost four decades ago.
Many of todays Attachment Parenting principles were first brought to the attention of Western cultures through a
slender volume titled The Continuum Concept: In Search of Happiness Lost.

Its author, the late Jean Liedloff, spent two and a half years living with a Stone Age South American tribe, observing them and
recording their way of life.

The Yekuana Indians were unlike any people Liedloff had ever encountered. They seemed universally happy and fulfilled.
Their children, especially, were remarkably calm and independent. In the entire time she stayed with them, she witnessed no
sibling rivalry, no whining, and almost no crying, fussing or tantrums among their infants and small children.

She was amazed to see older children and teens confidently performing difficult tasks and making mature decisions, without
the defiance or recalcitrance so common in Western adolescents. In her own words:

Amazingly, the children never fought. They played together all day unsupervised, all ages, from crawling, to
walking to adolescence. Not only did they not fight, they never even argued. This is not at all what we have been
taught human nature is.

Liedloff observed that in this culture, as in many other indigenous societies around the globe, children were treated very
differently than in Western cultures. She began to develop a theory of human social development based on her observations.

According to her, every human being is born with an inborn expectation to undergo certain natural social experiences. These
begin with being held immediately after birth, and an extended in-arms phase in early infancy.
 Liedloff called her theory the Continuum Concept, because she maintained that
these experiences should come sequentially (in a continuum), and are necessary
for the sustainable continuation of our species.

Missing one or more of them, according to Liedloff, can cause an individual to

have trouble integrating properly into society.

And by extension, one would assume that a society that does not routinely provide
these experiences to its members is likely to, eventually, break down.

You may be familiar with many of these Continuum practices as the basic
principles of the Attachment Parenting (AP) movement, which Liedloffs ideas
influenced greatly.

Several, like babywearing, extended nursing, and co-sleeping are, if not wholly
embraced by Western society, at least becoming better known and more
accepted.

However, most Western parents who follow these practices agree that their
families are still far from experiencing the ideal of human contentedness that
Liedloff describes in her book.

Assuming that Liedloffs observations are accurate, how can we continue to improve upon our parenting practices? In other
words, once the honeymoon of infancy is over, what then?

Beyond Infancy

In examining The Continuum Concept (and related materials included on the books website) for hints on parenting children
ages toddler and beyond, three main principles spring forth as very different from the way most of us were raised, and
continue to raise our children:

The first principle is a profound trust in the child.

Caregivers in continuum societies understand that the child is an inherently good citizen, with an innate desire to please and
an inborn sense of self-preservation.

Nobodys born rotten, writes Liedloff. You just dont have bad kids. There is no such thing. But we can make
them bad. Ironically, the reason its possible is because we are so social.

Our social nature is such that we tend to meet the expectations of our elders. Whenever this reversal took place
and our elders stopped expecting us to be social and expected us to be anti-social, or greedy or selfish or dirty or
destructive or self-destructive thats when the real fall took place. And were paying for it dearly.

Instead of warning the child to behave and laying out consequences for bad behavior, Liedloff advocates simply modeling the
good behavior, and expecting the child to follow suit. If the child errs, he should be gently instructed to change his behavior,
but he should never be judged negatively as a person because of his mistakes.

The second Continuum concept to keep in mind is that the child should not be the center of attention.

Neither, however, should he be excluded from adult society. In Yekuana society, Liedloff observed that adults were available
to the child as needed, but focused primarily on their own activities, not on their role as parents. This approach lets the child
learn by direct observation and to begin participating in adult activities as he is ready, without the pressure of being in the
spotlight.

Of course, this does not mean that one should never pay attention to or play with ones child. It simply, in Liedloffs
words, reflects an understanding of the childs role as a learner in society.
The child needs a mother who is confident and calm a mother who knows what to do, and doesnt ask permission from her
child. If youre pleading with her (or asking her to lead), then shes got the power, and it makes her nervous because it means
youre not sure of yourself, and youre begging her for acceptance (or direction).

Any grown-up lady that pleads with a 4-year-old is not to be relied on.

Rather than following the childs lead, Liedloff suggests telling her nicely but matter-of-factly what you expect her to do,
without asking her permission or regaling her with choices or reasons. In other words, instead of saying, Lets go have some
lunch now, OK? What would you like to eat? tell your child OK, now its time for lunch. Can you find the spoons? Were
going to have soup.

Keep in mind, though, that taking the lead is not the same thing as taking control over your child. The parents Liedloff
observed never forced a child to do chores. They simply modeled the behavior, and made sure the tools - like a child-size
grater - were available to the child.
When a child showed an interest, she was allowed to participate as long as she wanted to. It was simply expected that she
would naturally want to learn how to do the tasks she observed the adults doing.

By the time they are old enough to be truly helpful, Liedloff noted that continuum-raised children will simply and quietly obey
requests for help from adults, reciprocating the respect they had been shown when they were little.

The question for modern parents becomes, Past infancy, how do we continue to give our children the continuum experiences
they need in the context of our own society?

This leads us to the third principle: that a healthy human experience must include interaction between people of
many different ages.

It is easy for Stone Age parents to be available to their children without making them the center of attention. After all, they live
where they work, and their children spend most of their time freely playing with other children, both younger and older than
they are.

In fact, every person in their culture is able to model older individuals, and mentor younger individuals in turn. This allows for
smooth passage from one stage of life to the next, and reduces or eliminates friction between generations.
In a society which divides its tribes into isolated nuclear families, where adults must often work outside the home, where
children are not typically welcomed into the workplace, and where, from preschool to nursing home, our age segregation
practices border on the extreme, is it even possible to offer our children - and ourselves - the experiences we apparently need
to become truly fulfilled human beings?

Perhaps not to the extent that the Yekuana could. But just as many Western parents have resurrected the practices of
babywearing and co-sleeping, why not reclaim the tribal experience as well?

Whether through conscious decisions or instinct, many parents are attempting to do just that - resurrect something of the
primal, tribal human experience. In their own ways, they are seeking opportunities to connect with other families in ways that
are more natural, organically developing and holistic.

Extended Family

For some families, tribe-building is as simple as staying in place or moving back to live close to extended family. A recent
PEW study revealed that 43 percent of young people ages 1831 are now living with their parents or other kin. This includes
a growing number of families with young children, according to Carmen Wong-Ulrich of Baby Center Financial.
Granted, this is happening primarily as a result of economic pressure, rather than the desire for a more natural social
structure. However, many of these families are discovering benefits to this arrangement beyond financial relief.

It was nice to rediscover a relationship with my parents as a parent.

I dont think our vision was ever, oh lets go live with our parents again when we are older, but you know, it worked
out, commented one young mother who spent a year living with her parents while she and her husband saved up
for a home of their own.

Other parents report increased feelings of security, carpooling and other shared duties made easier, built-in babysitters, and
family bonding as benefits of living with or near family members.

But for the majority of us, living near family is just not an option. What then?

Creating Your Own Tribe

Teresa Pitmans classic article Finding Your Tribe offers one solution. First published in 2000, it has been republished many
times since, inspiring parents all over the world to create modern tribal relationships with friends and neighbors. It the article,
Pitman describes her relationship with her friend Vicki.

Starting when their first babies were infants, the two would get together and help each other with household chores or prepare
meals for both families to enjoy, while their kids had the benefit of unstructured play time with adults who remained in close
proximity, but engaged in their own adult activities.

It wasnt until she read Liedloffs book that Pitman realized she and Vicki had unconsciously created their own little tribal
community.
Pitman points out that tribe-building involves much more than just scheduling regular playdates. You have to spend a lot of
time together, and its important that it not just be all visiting time. Work together. Clean house, work on your car, do projects
together, garden, prepare meals, or start a business together.

Take care of the childrens needs as they need you; otherwise, let them alone to observe how youre going about your tasks -
or not, as they please.

She also cautions not to be too picky about whom you form your tribe with. Just like family, the people you find available may
have some qualities that differ from your ideals. Thats OK; as long as you can respect each others choices and beliefs
theres no reason you cant form a deep and lasting relationship.

Homeschooling

Its very common for parents of young children to get together frequently, and often these relationships result in lasting bonds
between families. However, once the children reach school age, time spent together in this way often diminishes.
Homeschooling families have a unique advantage in this regard.

They are also better able to respond to childrens natural developmental patterns, and more likely to have the opportunity to
interact with children of a larger age range than their schooled counterparts - an important aspect of Continuum ideals.
In situations where homeschooling occurs between and around running a home-based business, children also get to observe
and learn firsthand how the adult world operates in a way that was once a normal part of growing up, but is now no longer
available to the vast majority of modern children.

That said, many homeschoolers still find their lives increasingly dominated by schedules and goals, especially as children
grow older. If a tribal experience is truly your ideal, you might find yourself drawn to at least partial unschooling.

The School Conundrum

If homeschooling is not an option for your familys situation, what then? If you are brave and resourceful, you might consider
organizing your own school or other institution.

This is what Natalie Cronin did. She started her home daycare, Under the Tinker Tree, out of a desire to provide her own
children with an experience more closely resembling her ideals than would otherwise be possible. Luckily, her vision
resonated with others in her community.

I share my home with a dozen families a day, and we have a saying that Were all in it together. It was an
interesting process

I was very upfront about [all my beliefs about childrearing], and people would come, and they were looking for
people like me and I was looking for people like them. [Id tell them] we arent caring for just the child, were here
for the whole family, and thats really what its become.

Our community has become so close. The parents contact each other after daycare, and we all live within a few
blocks of each other - I have six families who live in the same apartment building as I do. So we really do have our
own little community and were very supportive of each other.

Pioneering a tribal style school for older children is more of a challenge than starting a daycare, but is certainly within the
realm of possibility if enough parents in a given community are willing to devote time and resources to making it happen.
Institutional Tribalism?

If starting a school is not an option, you still may be able to integrate some semblances of a tribal existence into the fabric of
your familys life by carefully choosing amongst the schools, churches and other organizations in your area, and/or by
advocating for more Continuum-friendly practices within the organizations you already belong to.

Finding a local Rudolf Steiner school might be a good alternative

Keep in mind that it is extremely difficult to change already existing conventions.

If you cant homeschool, the first thing is to seek out alternative schools that have age mixing and arent so set on
separating and segregating people, advises parenting coach Scott Noelle, who corresponded extensively with
Liedloff while she was alive, and now operates the Liedloff Continuum Network website.

You can also look for a school that doesnt grade children; thats another way to separate people, by good kids
and bad kids and A students and B students and so forth.

Noelle adds that there are things you can do to protect your child from the less Continuum-friendly aspects of
school life.

I encourage parents to let (their children) know that the school culture is like a game that they play, and there are
parts of the game that are good to play, like learning and meeting new friends, but that well have to tolerate other
parts of the game that are not as aligned with our true nature, like grading for example.

You can assure your children that the grading is just a game and we dont have to take it too seriously. They do
take it seriously - they forget that its just a game. So tell them, Im not too worried about [the game]. If what youre
ready for doesnt align perfectly with their game then you may get low marks in their game, but I know youll
blossom in your own time.

You may find yourself in the position of wanting to introduce elements of modern tribalism into an existing organization. This is
challenging, but not impossible. If you want to do this, its usually a good idea to become an active, participating member of
the group first, before attempting change.

Then, frame your suggestions in a way that helps them meet existing wants and needs. For instance, you might volunteer to
set up a program to help your organizations single-parent families network with and support each other.
Intentional Communities

To some, the ultimate in modern tribe building may well be to start an intentional community based on Continuum and other
natural living concepts. However, a quick search reveals very few existing intentional communities that openly base their
values on Continuum ideals. (Heart-Culture Farm near Eugene, Oregon, is one.)

Why is this? Surely, there are enough families interested in following an attachment parenting lifestyle to warrant a larger
number of communities specifically designed to support it?

Could it be that the very concept of an intentional community (at least, as most of us are likely to think of it) is alien to a
Continuum worldview? After all, Liedloff herself noted that the Yekuana people were highly reluctant to sway anyone elses
opinion or influence their behavior. Yet most intentional communities are very specific as to what is and is not acceptable
behavior.

Noelle recounts a personal intentional community experience which may shed some light on this question:

The Internet was making people more aware, and some people began discussing the idea of having a community
of people where the values were aligned with the Continuum Concept, which all of us were very passionate
about.

So I wrote up a long and passionate post to this online community - right around the year 2000 - lets go for it!
Somehow a lot of people got impassioned about it and we did start organizing. It led to a fairly sizable group of
people from all over the world getting together for an organizational meeting.

We accidentally experienced tribe for about two days. We had this gathering in my hometown, Portland, Oregon.
People had different travel schedules, and a number of people got there a few days before the big meeting.

They camped out in our yard and we kind of had this village we created in our yard, and we were all just waiting
 and very optimistic.

So we actually had this tribal experience, and I can only say it was glorious.

It was just wonderful, the feeling of this expanded social circle where everyone is just sort of flowing together. The
children had all these choices [of playmates].

They could play with one and when they were done they could play with another and if a childs mom needed a
break there was someone there to attend to the child. And we were living that way for a couple of days while we
were waiting for this meeting.

Then the meeting happened and everyone brought their agendas with them, and their particular attachments that
things had to be a certain way, and we started to lose some of that being in the moment with each other. Now it
had to be right vs wrong

We might have weathered that, but I think ultimately a lot of us were recovering our humanity. The thing about
community movements, is that people are attracted to communities because theyre failing in some way. I dont
mean that as a criticism.

If people are succeeding at the whole separation game in society, theyre succeeding within the rules of that game,
and theyre not motivated to change. Its the ones who are failing who are like, This doesnt work for me, so Im
open to trying something new. And they come across this idea of communitarianism, and theyre willing to try.

But then you have a whole bunch of wounded people who are trying to lift each other up. And I could see that in
this particular project, including myself and my wifewe definitely lacked the skill set to do that."

Noelle suspects that being well funded could help such a project overcome this issue by allowing participants the security to
work out their differences. When youre just in survival mode you get defensive, feeling like someone elses needs may
encroach on your own.

Given this experience and others, it seems that this elusive tribal experience is not something to be sought as a goal, but
something experienced naturally when people come together without goals or expectations, simply in the enjoyment of being
together.

What about the Internet?

Many people these days are spending increasing amounts of time and energy on the Internet in hopes of connecting to like-
minded souls. Without denigrating the very real value many find in their online relationships (this author included), its
important to note that virtual reality is in many ways antithetical to a Continuum experience.

The Continuum concept is about more than the sequence of human development. Its about the continuum of humanity
across many lifespans, and the play of matter and consciousness amongst and between humans, other species, Mother
Earth and the universe itself.
Children, especially, need to experience the world holistically through their senses - the real world with all their senses, not
just a pared-down, wired-up virtual semblance with no taste or touch or smell. And believe it or not, we adults need this too.

There is no virtual substitute for the connection one feels when ones eyes meet anothers, or the sensation of a warm slice of
homemade bread passing from one hand to another, or the volumes spoken in minute variations in a loved ones smile.

Seeking Your Own Tribe

Cronin, Noelle and Pitman all offer excellent suggestions for developing the kind of comfort with ourselves and others that
appears to be a prerequisite for a Continuum lifestyle.

Be honest about your feelings and needs, both to yourself and to others - if your children just arent up to
participating in a play date on a particular day, its better to stay home than to force the issue.

Remember to breathe - you wont connect well with others until you are comfortable and relaxed in your own
space.

Reconnect with the natural world - even if you live in a city, just going for a walk and passing a tree is connecting
and centering.

Spend a lot of time together.

Choose options that lead to partnership rather than separation and control.

Be open to relationships with people who are in different stages of parenthood or life, or whose habits or beliefs
differ from yours.

Focus more strongly on how youre connected with people than on how youre different.

Unplug.

Above all, be open about the outcome. Allow your tribe to grow organically, from the inside out. Forget about your goals and
focus instead on just the experience of being, right here and right now, with those you happen to be with at the moment. The
destination is the journey itself.
Related: New Amphetamine-Based ADHD Medication for Children Disguised as Candy

Play Again: What Are The Consequences Of A Childhood Removed From Nature?

One generation from now most Westerners will have spent more time in the virtual world than in
nature. New media technologies have improved our lives in countless ways. Information now
appears with a click. Overseas friends are part of our daily lives. And even grandma loves Wii.

But what are we missing when we are behind screens? And how will this impact our children, our society, and
eventually, our planet? At a time when children play more behind screens than outside, PLAY AGAIN explores the
changing balance between the virtual and natural worlds. Is our connection to nature disappearing down the digital
rabbit hole?

This moving and humorous documentary follows six teenagers who, like the average American child, spend five to fifteen
hours a day behind screens. PLAY AGAIN unplugs these teens and takes them on their first wilderness adventure no
electricity, no cell phone coverage, no virtual reality.
Through the voices of children and leading experts including journalist Richard Louv, sociologist Juliet Schor, environmental
writer Bill McKibben, educators Diane Levin and Nancy Carlsson-Paige, neuroscientist Gary Small, parks advocate Charles
Jordan, and geneticist David Suzuki, PLAY AGAIN investigates the consequences of a childhood removed from nature and
encourages action for a sustainable future.

Where We are Coming From

Seventy years ago, the first televisions became commercially available. The first desktop computers went on sale 30 years
ago, and the first cell phones a mere 15 years ago. During their relatively short tenure these three technologies have changed
the way we live. Some of these changes are good.

Television can now rapidly disseminate vital information. Computers turned that flow of information into a two-way street. Cell
phones enable unprecedented connectivity with our fellow human beings. And the merging of cell phones and the internet has
even allowed protest movements around the world to organize and thrive.
But theres also a down side. For many people, especially children, screens have become the de facto medium by which the
greater world is experienced. A virtual world of digitally transmitted pictures, voices, and scenarios has become more real to
this generation than the world of sun, water, air, and living organisms, including fellow humans.

The average American child now spends over eight hours in front of a screen each day. She emails, texts, and updates her
status incessantly. He can name hundreds of corporate logos, but less than ten native plants. She aspires to have hundreds
of online friends, most she may never meet in person.
He masters complicated situations presented in game after game, but often avoids simple person-to-person
conversation. They are almost entirely out of contact with the world that, over millions of years of evolution, shaped human
beings - the natural world.

The long-term consequences of this experiment on human development remain to be seen, but the stakes couldnt be higher.
By most accounts, this generation will face multiple crises - environmental, economic and social. Will this screen world - and
its bevy of virtual experiences - have adequately prepared these digital natives to address the problems theyll face,
problems on whose resolution their own survival may depend?

As we stand at a turning point in our relationship with earth, we find ourselves immersed in the gray area between the natural
and virtual worlds. From a global perspective of wonder and hope, PLAY AGAIN examines this unique point in history.

If You're Juicing Non-Organic Produce, You're Just Poisoning Yourself With A

Pesticide Cocktail
June 17 2016 | From: NaturalNews

I have an important warning today for all those people who are poisoning themselves to death by
juicing non-organic produce: STOP what you are doing and think for a minute about how juicing
really works.
Juicing is an extraction technology that pulls liquids and nutrients out of fresh produce items like apples, carrots,
celery and greens.

The data reveal sometimes-contradictory attitudes towards reproducibility. Although 52% of those surveyed agree that there
is a significant 'crisis' of reproducibility, less than 31% think that failure to reproduce published results means that the result
is probably wrong, and most say that they still trust the published literature.

One of the things I've learned as the lab science director of CWC Labs is that most pesticides are water soluble, meaning
they are extracted with the juice and stay in the juice until you drink it.

A glass of fresh juice made from non-organic fruits and vegetables is a glass of pesticide juice.

Juicing Removes the Very PlantFibers that Can Protect You Against Pesticides and Heavy Metals

Even worse, consider the fact that juicing, by definition, removes all the plant fibers, leaving behind just the absorbable
liquids. Plant fibers actually block toxic pesticides and heavy metals in your digestive tract, capturing them so that your body
eliminates them. But when you drink juice without those fibers, you body absorbs the juice - and everything in it - far more
efficiently and quickly.
Comment: A way around this is to simply use a blender rather than a juicer. Sure, its chewy but you get the fibre
too.

Thus, if your fresh juice is filled with pesticide chemicals, you will be rapidly absorbing pesticide chemicals the moment you
start drinking the juice.

And yes, pesticide chemicals persist for a very long time. They survive sunlight, harvesting, cleaning and juicing. (And no,
you can't "wash off" all the pesticides because they are INSIDE the produce!) They even survive human digestion, which is
why pesticides can be easily detected in urine and breast milk.

The Answer? Only Juice ORGANIC Produce or Things You've Grown Yourself

You should never juice fresh produce that has been produced with chemical pesticides. There are only two categories of
things which are safe to juice:

1) Organic produce.

2) Produce you grow yourself.

This is why I grow so much of my own produce using the Food Rising Mini-Farm Grow Boxes I invented a couple of years
ago. They use no electricity and no pumps, yet they grow huge quantities of beets, parsley, cilantro, strawberries and as
much lettuce as you'd ever want to juice.

You can get these systems at SupplySource.com or learn how to make them yourself at FoodRising.org.

If You do Juice Non-Organic Produce, Blend with Organic Produce Fibers in a Vita-Mix

If you must juice non-organic produce, here's the solution to protect yourself: Blend whole fruits in a Vita-Mix to get the
fruit fibers into the juice, then combine with the juiced greens from your juicing machine.

Importantly, the organic fruit fibers will help block the pesticides during digestion. What are the best fruits for this?
Strawberries, grapefruit and apples.
All three have powerful fibers with a strong affinity for pesticide chemicals. They serve as a kind of biological border against
pesticide toxins, preventing some of them from being absorbed into your blood. (Yes, borders are a good thing when you
need to keep the enemies out!)

Summary: Three Crucial Things to Remember About Juicing

1) If you juice conventional produce, you're just drinking a pesticide cocktail.

2) Fruit and vegetable fibers block your body's absorption of pesticide chemicals. (This is a strong argument for
consuming whole foods, not just extracted juices, by the way.)

3) If you must drink juice from conventional produce, mix it with fiber-rich organic whole foods blended in a Vita-
Mix or other blender. The best "defender" foods are strawberries, grapefruit and apples. For defense against heavy
metals, chlorella and peanut butter are also very effective.

Yes, I Know What I'm Talking About

As the lab science director of CWClabs.com, I use various extraction techniques for extracting water soluble pesticide
chemicals from many different types of foods and supplements.

CWC Labs is an internationally accredited (ISO 17025) laboratory with proven analytical excellence. There, I also run an
LC/MS-TOF (Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry) instrument to quantitate pesticide chemicals at very low levels (such as 5
ppb). So I know that pesticides persist in all sorts of fresh produce items, and I know that pesticides are soluble in water and
juice.
I've also conducted extensive studies on how food fibers protect your body from absorbing heavy metals such as lead,
mercury and cadmium. This research will soon be expanded into analyzing how well fibers block popular pesticide
chemicals (and eventually, glyphosate!).

My lab is about to launch commercial testing services for pesticide analysis in food, beverages and water. To learn more
about my lab's commercial testing services, contact us at this link.

How Baking Soda Became A Cancer Treatment + Oncologists Dont Like Baking Soda
Cancer Treatment Because Its Too Effective And Too Cheap
June 15 2016 | From: iHealthTube / GetHolisticHealth / NaturalNews

Even the most aggressive cancers which have metastasized have been reversed with baking soda
cancer treatments. Although chemotherapy is toxic to all cells, it represents the only measure that
oncologists employ in their practice to almost all cancer patients. In fact, 9 out of 10 cancer patients
agree to chemotherapy first without investigating other less invasive options.
Doctors and pharmaceutical companies make money from it. Thats the only reason chemotherapy is still used. Not
because its effective, decreases morbidity, mortality or diminishes any specific cancer rates.

Related: How Alkaline Water Kills Cancer Cells And How To Prepare It

A few years ago, University of Arizona Cancer Center member Dr. Mark Pagel received a $2 million grant from the National
Institutes of Health to study the effectiveness of personalized baking soda cancer treatment for breast cancer.

Obviously there are people in the know who have understood that sodium bicarbonate, that same stuff that can save a
persons life in the emergency room in a heartbeat, is a primary cancer treatment option of the safest and most effective kind.

Studies have shown that dietary measures to boost bicarbonate levels can increase the pH of acidic tumors without
upsetting the pH of the blood and healthy tissues.
Animal models of human breast cancer show that oral sodium bicarbonate does indeed make tumors more alkaline and
inhibit metastasis.

Based on these studies, plus the fact that baking soda is safe and well tolerated, world renowned doctors such as Dr. Julian
Whitaker have adopted successful cancer treatment protocols as part of an overall nutritional and immune support program
for patients who are dealing with the disease.

The Whitaker protocol uses 12 g (2 rounded teaspoons) of baking soda mixed in 2 cups water, along with a low-cal sweetener
of your choice. (Its quite salty tasting.) Sip this mixture over the course of an hour or two and repeat for a total of three times
a day.

One man claims he has found a cure for cancer using baking soda and molasses and actually successfully treated his own
disease by using baking soda.
When taken orally with water, especially water with high magnesium content, and when used transdermally in medicinal
baths, sodium bicarbonate becomes a first-line medicinal for the treatment of cancer, and also kidney disease, diabetes,
influenza and even the common cold.

It is also a powerful buffer against radiation exposure, so everyone should be up to speed on its use. Everybodys physiology
is under heavy nuclear attack from strong radioactive winds that are circling the northern hemisphere.

Dr. Robert J. Gillies and his colleagues have already demonstrated that pre-treatment of mice with baking soda results in the
alkalinization of the area around tumors. The same researchers reported that bicarbonate increases tumor pH and also
inhibits spontaneous metastases in mice with breast cancer.

Related: Healing the Kidneys with Sodium Bicarbonate (Baking Soda)

What is Baking Soda?

Baking soda is a white crystalline solid that appears as fine powder. It is also called cooking soda, bread soda and
bicarbonate of soda. Its chemical name is sodium bicarbonate or sodium hydrogen carbonate.

Baking soda is different from washing soda (sodium carbonate) although they share the same slightly salty and alkaline taste.

This widely used soda is commonly dissolved in mineral water and used as a leavening agent in baking. It works as a
leavening agent by neutralizing the acidic components of batter. The neutralization releases carbon dioxide and leads to the
raising or expansion of baked foods.
Baking soda has also been used to soften vegetable and to tenderize meat.

As a household chemical, baking soda is used as a cleaning agent. It is included in toothpastes for similar reasons where it
serves as an antiseptic, acid-neutralizer, whitening agent and plaque-removing agent as well as a cleaning agent.

Other common personal hygiene products in which baking soda can be found include deodorants and shampoos.

Baking Soda and pH Medicine

The pH of our tissues and body fluids is crucial and central because it affects and mirrors the state of our health or our inner
cleanliness. The closer the pH is to 7.35-7.45, the higher our level of health and wellbeing.

Staying within this range dramatically increases our ability to resist acute illnesses like colds and flues as well as the onset of
cancer and other diseases. Keeping our pH within a healthy range also involves necessary lifestyle and dietary changes that
will protect us over the long term while the use of sodium bicarbonate gives us a jump-start toward increased alkalinity.
The pH scale is like a thermometer showing increases and decreases in the acid and alkaline content of fluids.
Deviations above or below a 7.35-7.45 pH range in the tightly controlled blood can signal potentially serious and dangerous
symptoms or states of disease.

When the body can no longer effectively neutralize and eliminate the acids, it relocates them within the bodys extra-cellular
fluids and connective tissue cells directly compromising cellular integrity. Conversely when the body becomes too alkaline
from too much bicarbonate in the blood, metabolic alkalosis occurs, which can lead to severe consequences if not corrected
quickly.

Jon Barron presents a way of looking at pH that opens up one of the major benefits of alkaline water:

Hydrogen ions tie up oxygen. That means that the more acid a liquid is, the less available the oxygen in it. Every
cell in our body requires oxygen for life and to maintain optimum health. Combine that with what we know about
hydrogen ions and we see that the more acid the blood (the lower its pH), the less oxygen is available for use by
the cells.

Without going into a discussion of the chemistry involved, just understand that its the same mechanism involved
when acid rain kills a lake.

The fish literally suffocate to death because the acid in the lake binds up all of the available oxygen. Its not that
the oxygen has gone anywhere; its just no longer available. Conversely, if you raise the pH of the lake (make it
more alkaline), oxygen is now available and the lake comes back to life.

Incidentally, its worth noting that cancer is related to an acid environment (lack of oxygen)the higher the pH (the
more oxygen present in the cells of the body), the harder it is for cancer to thrive."

Understanding this is important for two reasons: (1) it reveals one of the primary benefits of alkaline watermore available
oxygen in the system and (2) it explains why alkaline water helps fight cancer.

How Baking Soda Can Help Cure Cancer

Basically, malignant tumors represent masses of rapidly growing cells. The rapid rate of growth experienced by these cells
means that cellular metabolism also proceeds at very high rates.

Therefore, cancer cells are using a lot more carbohydrates and sugars to generate energy in the form of ATP (adenosine
triphosphate).

However, some of the compounds formed from the energy production include lactic acid and pyruvic acid. Under normal
circumstances, these compounds are cleared and utilized as soon as they are produced. But cancer cells are experiencing
metabolism at a much faster rate. Therefore, these organic acid accumulate in the immediate environment of the tumor.

The high level of extracellular acidity around the tumor is one of the chief driving force behind the metastasis of cancer
tumors.

Basically, cancer cells need an acidic environment to grow and spread rapidly.

Some cancer experts, therefore, believe that by buffering the tumor microenvironment with an alkalizing compound, the pH of
tumors can be raised enough to starve them and stop their growth and spread.

Curiously, this rather simple solution to cancer has been proven right.

What is even more remarkable is that there is no need to cook up some fancy synthetic drug to lower the acidity in the
immediate environment of the tumor. A simple, commonly obtained compound like sodium bicarbonate will do.

Obviously, it is desirable to deliver the sodium bicarbonate as close to the tumor as possible since its pH-raising effect is
needed in the microenvironment of the tumor. Therefore, directly injecting sodium bicarbonate in the tumor site is considered
a better solution than oral administration. However, oral sodium bicarbonate is just safer and can be readily used at home.

A 2009 study published in the journal, Cancer Research, is among the first to confirm that the alkalinizing effect of
sodium bicarbonate can indeed stop cancer.

By injecting sodium bicarbonate into a group of mice, the authors of the study were able to determine how the growth and
spread of cancer tumors were effected by raising the pH of the organ affected by the cancer.
The study results showed that baking soda indeed raised the pH and reduced spontaneous metastases in mice induced with
breast cancer.

The researchers also determined that sodium bicarbonate works by raising the pH outside cells and not within cells. This is an
important finding because it suggests that sodium bicarbonate does not interfere with cellular metabolism even as it makes
the microenvironment unconducive for tumor growth.

Other findings from this study show that baking soda:

Reduced the involvement of the lymph node on the transport of cancer cells

Does not lower the levels of circulating tumor cells

Reduced the involvement of the liver and, therefore, the spread of tumor cells to other organs

Inhibit the colonization of other organs by circulating tumor cells

The Baking Soda Formula for Cancer

To make the baking soda natural cancer remedy at home, you need maple syrup, molasses or honey to go along with the
baking soda. In Dr. Sircus book, he documented how one patient used baking soda and blackstrap molasses to fight the
prostate cancer that had metastasized to his bones.
 On the first day, the patient mixed 1 teaspoon of baking
soda with 1 teaspoon of molasses in a cup of water.

He took this for another 3 days after which his saliva pH

read 7.0 and his urine pH read 7.5.

Encouraged by these results, the patient took the solution 2

times on day 5 instead of once daily. And from day 6 10,
he took 2 teaspoons each of baking soda and molasses
twice daily.

By the 10th day, the patients pH had risen to 8.5 and the
only side effects experienced were headaches and night
sweat (similar to cesium therapy). The next day, the patient
had a bone scan and too other medical tests.

His results showed that his PSA (prostate-specific antigen,

the protein used to determine the severity of prostate
enlargement and prostate cancer) level was down from 22.3
at the point of diagnosis to 0.1.

Another baking soda formula recommends mixing 90

teaspoons of maple syrup with 30 teaspoons of baking
soda.

To do this, the maple syrup must be heated to become less

viscous. Then the baking syrup is added and stirred for 5
minutes until it is fully dissolved.

This preparation should provide about 10-day worth of the

baking soda remedy. 5 7 teaspoons per day is the
recommended dose for cancer patients.

Care should be taken when using the baking soda remedy to treat cancer. This is because sustaining a high pH level can
itself cause metabolic alkalosis and electrolyte imbalance. These can result in edema and also affect the heart and blood
pressure.

One does not have to be a doctor to practice pH medicine. Every practitioner of the healing arts and every mother and father
needs to understand how to use sodium bicarbonate. Bicarbonate deficiency is a real problem that deepens with age so it
really does pay to understand and appreciate what baking soda is all about.

How Baking Soda Became A Cancer Treatment

Dr. Tullio Simoncini discusses how he discovered sodium bicarbonate, or baking soda, could be a successful
treatment for cancers. He discusses how a treatment for psoriasis led to him trying something different for cancer
patients. He also gives an example of how well and quickly it worked in one of his patients!

Discover the Baking Soda and Lemon Juice Combination that Eradicates Cancer Cells
Better than Prescription Doxil and Adriamycin

If you are looking for a daily tonic to improve your overall health and lower your risk of cancer, look no further than a
simple combination of lemon juice and baking soda. Lemon is a potent superfood filled with cancer-fighting
compounds.
In addition, alkaline diet theory classifies both lemon and baking soda as pH-raising foods. The idea is that certain foods
either make your body more acidic (lower pH) or more alkaline (higher pH), with an alkaline environment ideal for preventing
cancer and other chronic diseases (and a more acidic environment promoting disease).

Lemon Extract Outperforms Chemo Drugs

Even without any pH benefits, lemon is a potent healing food. More than 20 studies dating as far back as 1970 have showed
that lemon and lemon extracts are able to destroy at least 12 different varieties of cancer cells, and also prevent cancer from
metastasizing. At least one study showed that lemon extract was 10,000 times stronger than mainstream chemotherapy
drugs such as Adriamycin.
 The full reasons for lemon's cancer-fighting effects are not
known, but they have been partially attributed to the fruit's
high levels of the antioxidant and cancer-fighter, vitamin C,
and also the the presence of the phytochemicals known,
appropriately enough, as limonoides.

Like many plant-based cancer treatments, lemon seems

more likely to leave healthy cells unharmed than
chemotherapy drugs.

In addition to these benefits, lemon is an antibacterial and

anti-fungal, and can also be used to treat intestinal worms
and other parasites.

It has been shown to relieve heartburn, bloating, constipation

and nausea, to prevent kidney stones, to help regulate blood
pressure, and to relieve stress and depression.

Practitioners of alkaline diet-based medicine also say that in

spite of its acidic nature, lemon helps make the body more
alkaline.

The alkaline diet has been prominently promoted by

researcher Robert O. Young, author of the 2002 book The
pH miracle.

"The focus for preventing and reversing cancer must

be on maintaining the alkaline pH of the body fluids,
and a recognition that cancer is a systemic acidic
condition," Young has written.

To prepare a pH-boosting drink, mix a teaspoon of baking soda with about 7 ounces (just under a cup) of lemon juice. The
beverage can be diluted with distilled water, as long as you drink the whole thing. For best benefit, it should be taken on an
empty stomach, first thing in the morning.

Why and How to Raise Your Body's pH

Promoters of the alkaline diet say that raising your body's pH can provide a wide range of health benefits, including reducing
your risk of obesity, cysts, allergies, and chronic inflammatory conditions such as gout, arthritis and fibromyalgia. Seasonal
and food allergies are also attributed to an overly acidic body environment, as are general fatigue, weakness and lack of
energy.

If you are concerned that your body is overly acidic, the best way to improve the condition is to shift your eating patterns.
According to Young, an optimal diet consists of 80 percent alkaline foods and only 20 percent acidic foods.

Acidic foods are meat, dairy, sugar, refined grains, alcohol and caffeine. Alkaline foods include nearly all fruits, vegetables,
nuts and seeds.
Some of the top alkaline superfoods are alfalfa sprouts, avocado, broccoli, brussels sprouts, buckwheat, cabbage, cauliflower,
celery, chives, cucumber, flax seeds and oil, garlic, grapefruit, green beans, green peas, leeks, lemons and limes, lettuce,
melon, millet, olive oil, onions, parsley, pears, pumpkin, radishes, sesame seeds and paste (tahini), soy (beans, sprouts and
products), spinach, tomatoes, watermelon, wild rice and zucchini.

Young also recommends consuming slightly alkaline (ionized) water, in order to flush out wastes that have built up from years
of eating unhealthy foods. A lemon-baking soda drink may be a more natural, less expensive way to achieve the same effect,
however.
26 Natural Alternatives For Allergies
June 8 2016 | From: GreenMedInfo

It does need to be made clear from a legal perspective that this is not medical advice - as we are
well aware by now that the pharmaceutical giants have the judiciary well in their pockets should
anyone dare to make claims of effective medical solutions that do not fall under their
petrochemical-deriived, woefully ineffective; but staggeringly profitable pushing of junk science
medicine onto the general populace.

And don't even get me started on the Eugenics perspective. This is merely a sharing of infromation:

1. Butterbur exhibits protection against chemically-induced nasal responsiveness in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

2. Lactobacillus acidophilus can alleviate the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis.

3. A high intake of soy and isoflavones may be associated with a reduced prevalence of allergic rhinitis.

4. Intake of eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acids (DHA) from fish may be associated with a reduced
prevalence of allergic rhinitis.

5. Black cumin alleviates symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

6. Peppermint may be clinically effective in alleviating the nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis.
 7.High dietary intake of seaweed, calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus may be associated with a decreased
prevalence of allergic rhinitis.

8. Raw milk consumption (relative to boiled) is inversely associated to asthma, atopy and hay fever.

9. Rose extract exhibits anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic and pain-killing activities.

10. Propolis may be effective in the relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis through inhibition of histamine release.

11.An extract of the medicinal mushroom Agaricus blazei Murill can protect against allergy through reducing Th2
relative to Th1 cytokine levels.

12. Homeopathic treatment has value in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
 13. Lactobacillus casei moodulates immune response in allergic rhinitis and may help to alleviate symptoms.

14.Supplementation of mothers and their babies with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri reduces IgE-associated eczema
and may reduce respiratory allergic disease later in life.

15. Pycnogenol improves allergic rhinitis symptoms when supplementation is started at least 5 weeks before the onset of
the allergy season.

16. Beta-glucan improves symptoms and the Th1/Th2 balance in patients with allergic rhinitis.

17. Bifidobacterium longum relieves clinical symptoms of allergic rhinitis (hay fever).
 18. Curcumin attenuates the development of allergic airway inflammation and hyper-responsiveness.

19. Vitamin D deficiency is higher among children with asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, acute urticaria, and food
allergy.

20.A traditional Korean fermented soybean food exhibits anti-inflammatory activity which may have therapeutic value in
allergic conditions such as asthma and atopic dermatitis.

21. Loquat leaves have anti-allergic properties.

22. Onion exhibits anti-allergic, antihistaminic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties.

 23. Indian Oyster mushroom may be effective in the relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis through inhibition of histamine
release.

24. Peach extract inhibits mast cell-derived allergic inflammation.

25. Spirulina consumption significantly improves the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

26. Exclusive breastfeeding during the first 3 months after birth protects against allergic rhinitis in children, both with and
without a family history of atopy.

Long Before Pills, Our Ancestors Used These 12 Natural Antibiotics To Survive
Infections
June 7 2016 | From: NaturalNews

As readers of Natural News are well aware, the medical industry, in collusion with Big Pharma, has
been over-prescribing antibiotics for years, resulting in new strains of superbugs that are difficult
to kill.
In point of fact, it's not at all improper to suggest that at some point in the future, our overuse of antibiotics may
result in bacteria evolving to the point where nothing on earth can kill it.

Long before today's antibiotics were developed in labs, however, there were foods and herbs that helped us guard against
infection and disease on a daily basis. Indeed, many of these natural anti-bacterial defenders are still around today, and are
in use by holistic healers around the world.

Our ancestors had solutions for healing, utilizing antibiotics from nature which are still as valid now as they were then.

Oregano and oil of oregano: If you've ever had Italian food, chances are good that you've had oregano before, and you
probably didn't even realize its health benefits.
In addition to its antibacterial properties, oregano also aids in digestion and with weight loss. An oil found in oregano, called
Carvacrol, has also been found to fight bacteria that can lead to infection.

Raw apple cider vinegar: This has far-reaching benefits. Daily intake of apple cider vinegar includes antibiotic and
antiseptic benefits, while naturally alkalizing your system. It can also help you manage your weight, lower your cholesterol
and reduce your risk of developing cancer.

Honey: The ancient Romans knew of honey's antibacterial properties, using it to treat wounds and prevent subsequent
infections. And today, in countries all around the world, honey is still considered to be one of the best natural antimicrobials,
anti-inflammatories and antiseptics, in addition to its antibacterial properties. In fact, Manuka honey, found in New Zealand,
has been found to have the highest levels of antioxidants and curative abilities.

Turmeric: This brilliantly-colored spice is flavorful, but also has great body protection qualities. In addition, turmeric can be
both consumed and applied externally, which makes it a great all-round bacteria fighter.

For extra protection, you can mix turmeric with honey and create a paste to apply to skin.

Garlic: Again, more than just a wonderful seasoning, the garlic plant has very powerful qualities. It can fight the common
cold, keeping germs at bay before they have a chance to infect you. A compound in garlic - allicin - protects against yeast,
parasites, bacteria and more.

Grapefruit seed extract: According to the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, a study found that grapefruit
seed extract is effective against more than 800 known viruses and bacteria, as well as more than 100 strains of fungi and
parasites. Besides boosting antibacterial protection, this extract also alkalizes the body and improves gut flora.

Echinacea: Many people are not familiar with this product, but it certainly has wonderful antibacterial qualities.
Found in kitchens, this herb has been proven to reduce the amount of colds that the average person may experience in a
lifetime. Echinacea has also been found to shorten the duration of colds, but is best taken as a preventative measure.

Cabbage: A cruciferous vegetable, sulfur compounds found in cabbage are effective battlers of cancer, as are kale and
broccoli, two other members of the same family. But cabbage also contains a massive amount of vitamin C, with one cup
providing up to 75 percent of your daily recommended allowance.

Extra virgin coconut oil: You should be using more coconut oil anyway, because it's much better for you (because it's
natural) than chemical-laced vegetable cooking oils, but in addition to that, extra virgin coconut oil has anti-microbial and
anti-fungal properties, and is packed with antioxidants.
Use it to boost your immune system.

Fermented foods: Think unpasteurized cabbage, homemade pickles, kefir and probiotic yogurts all of which renew our
intestinal flora, which in turn protects against cancer and gives us greater ability to fight off infections.

Colloidal silver: This natural antibiotic is a mixture of silver particles that have been suspended in fluid, and has been used
for centuries. However, this treatment should only be used on a short-term basis, because too much silver, a heavy metal,
can be toxic as well. It works by disabling the enzyme that single-cell bacteria need in order to multiply.

Consumed The Movie: Showing Now

June 5 2016 | From: ConsumedTheMovie

Consumed is a dramatic thriller that explores the complex world of genetically modified food.
The story is anchored by a working-class, single Mother on a hunt to uncover the cause of her son's mysterious
illness.

Interwoven are the stories of an Organic farmer, the CEO of a biotechnology corporation, two Scientists on the verge of a
major discovery, and an ex-Cop caught in the middle of it all.
Click here to buy or Rent the film

Pharmacist Speaks Out: Get Off Prescription Drugs, Avoid Vaccines

June 4 2016 | From: ThePeoplesChemist

You gotta meet Margaret*. I changed her name to protect her privacy. She recently emailed me to
vent against Western Medicines push to get everyone hooked on drugs and stab kids with risky,
ineffective vaccines! Interestingly enough, she has seen medicine from an angle that most people
arent privy too.

Margaret is a pharmacist. With a Pharmacy (PharmD) degree, and over two decades working in the field of
pharmacy, shes seen firsthand how guideline-driven medicine has artificially forced every patient into the same
clinical box, thereby hooking them on drugs.

The result is that Doctors dont THINK anymore - they just do what theyre told, which is to put people on
meds. So many people in medicine (doctors, nurses, pharmacists) dont really question anything, says Margaret. Theyre
so busy that they just do what the guidelines say to do, rather than look at individuals and what makes sense.

A former employee of a major pharmaceutical company, Margaret left her job so she could spend more time with her family.
At the time, she questioned her former employers huge marketing budget and now believes the marketing of drugs to the
general public - along with guidelines-driven medicine - needs to stop.

"We never get the flu shot, she adds, referring to herself and her family. Ive read the entire package insert and
can take on anyone who tries to tell me that it is useful with just that information alone. My years in pharma taught
me just how clinical trials are designed to show the planned outcome - they arent real studies at all.
In a world where most parents dont even bother READING the flu vaccine insert, Margaret is a refreshing example of a
mother who takes charge.

She initially contacted me to ask: Shane, what has been the response been to what you write about vaccines? For those of
us with licenses to protect, we dont feel very safe voicing concerns about vaccines.

I understood completely.

Big Pharma fires anyone who speaks out. They work hard to cover up the truth.

I told Margaret what I tell everyone: The science cant be disputed. And since my job doesnt depend on parroting the status
quo, Ive had no problems whatsoever. My four kids are all unvaccinated and are strong, healthy, and vibrant. Attending
school has never been an issue, and who cares anyway, health comes first.

Curious to learn more about Margarets experience as a pharmacist, I asked for an interview.

She generously agreed to share more of her perspective as a pharmacist. What follows is a candid interview in which
Margaret encourages parents to stop, THINK, and get a reality check when it comes to vaccinating their kids. Commenting
on how vaccines are pushed - and sometimes even forced - on everyone, she says, Theyve done a very good job of
psychological indoctrination.

She also shares her thoughts on what needs to change in mainstream medicine, and why she chose to stop vaccinating.

*Not her real name. Name changed to protect her privacy.

1. Please summarise your overall pharmacy experience and how youve generally worked with
patients / clients.
Pharmacist: Im a pharmacist, but not one who is into mainstream medicine. I have broad pharmacy experience, and many
years working in Pharma (just like you, Shane)!

I heard the mantra, Todays drugs fund tomorrows discoveries but after a while, that didnt justify the huge
marketing budget in my opinion. I quit working at one of the worlds largest pharmaceutical companies without a job lined up.
I had my first child, and I wanted to hang out with him and figure out next steps.

I think I like retail pharmacy best, because its so important to talk to patients about their medications, especially people who
want to make lifestyle changes to get OFF their medications. But many people prefer to take a pill rather than change.

2. Why did you choose to become a pharmacist?

Margaret: I really stumbled into it! I never thought of myself as a science person, but I took some science classes and found
I liked them. Pharmacy is just more science.

3. What are you most proud of when it comes to your career?

Margaret: Ive enjoyed helping people. Especially if people are interested in lifestyle changes to get off medications - thats a
pleasure to help them.

4. What has shocked you the most, while working as a pharmacist?

Margaret: Even in pharmacy school, my professors stressed that things would change in our careers and we had to be
adaptable. Yet so many people in medicine (doctors, nurses, pharmacists) dont really question anything. Theyre
so busy (the workloads are so heavy!) that they just do what the guidelines say to do, rather than look at
individuals and what makes sense.
When I was a student, clinical pathways or guidelines were a new thing, and now theyve become essentially law - if you
dont follow treatment guidelines with what you recommend for a patient, you can be sued. The art of medicine has, for all
practical purposes, disappeared. Now its the Law of Medicine.

5. What is your biggest critique of mainstream medicine?

Margaret: Guideline-driven medicine. Most people have no idea about this and the effect on their health. It makes everyone
fit into the same box, and it drives your doctors treatment within that box instead of individualizing it. [Everyone gets same
drug, same dose.]

Doctors dont THINK anymore - they just do what theyre told. The only guideline I think is unquestionable is the one for
cardiac arrest - follow that emergency clinical pathway, for sure. Otherwise, its all about hooking patients on drugs.

6. Have you chosen to vaccinate anyone in your family?

Up to 6 months, yes. But not all of them. At that point, I pulled the plug on vaccines (see here why), as well as our
pediatrician. Now I use religious waivers. Unfortunately, after the vaccines, one of my children became very lethargic. I had
been researching them a lot up until then, and I decided to stop vaccinating. From that point on I focused on nursing and
boosting immunity naturally.
Later in life, my child was allergic to virtually all nuts and sesame. It didnt run in our family. I researched the sesame and
found that the allergy is increasing in places like Asia and Israel, where most vaccines are in sesame oil.

Oils in vaccines dont have to be labeled because theyre considered not active ingredients, and they may vary on
the lot. Manufacturers break up lots of vaccines and ship them all over, so that theres no pattern to any
reactions. Unfortunately, this can lead to the onslaught of allergic reactions.

7. Do you get the flu shot?

Margaret: We never get the flu shot. Ive read the entire package insert and can take on anyone who tries to tell me that it is
useful with just that information alone.

It doesnt work.

If you read the package insert, youll see that in the non-treated group, 4% got the flu. In the treatment arm, about
2% got the flu. So your risk of getting the flu is only 4% anyway. They got the 50% reduction in flu from simple math
2% is half of 4%. But your odds of NOT getting the flu are 96%.

If you put it that way, then the shot is not very compelling, is it? But they made it sound like it was, by telling you your risk
was reduced by 50% without telling you what the real odds of getting the flu were in the first place.

My years in pharma taught me just how clinical trials are designed to show the planned outcome they arent real studies
at all.

8. You mentioned, My years in pharma taught me how clinical trials are designed to show the
planned outcome - they arent real studies at all. Can you explain what this means for the average
American with respect to vaccines?

Margaret: Study design is not complicated. You have your null hypothesis, which supposes that there is no difference. And
you have your hypothesis, which supposes that there IS a difference.
To prove your hypothesis, you usually need such a big number of people that the study is too expensive to conduct. So they
go cheap and do smaller studies that show numerical differences, but not statistically significant differencesand they run
with that. All they ever need to do is show that their drug is not worse than the other drug, and they win. Then they can do a
marketing spin with the data, like they have with the flu vaccine.

9. In your experience, how is the truth about vaccines being covered up?

Margaret: Studies and the lack of studies. The studies that are currently out there - even those for vaccine approvals - quite
clearly show there are serious side effects. We dont know who is most at risk, yet the uniform mandate that all these
vaccines be given is forced on all of us.

People deny that there are serious side effects, and that makes me crazy because the package insert for the vaccines
themselves say there are side effects! There is not one other drug where the dose is the same no matter how big the
child isand that is troubling. We should be studying why some children react badly. There are genetic differences
among us that influence the efficacy or safety of other drugsyet if you question vaccines, youre called Jenny McCarthy
or youre told you dont know the science.

But I DO know the science, and the science is not being examined at all. Thats irresponsible.

10. In your professional opinion, should ALL people be required by law to take vaccines?

Margaret: No. Unlike most other drugs that you could stop taking if you had a reaction, you cant take back a vaccine. A
persons body is so precious, and even if hes a total looney tunes, he has a right to say no to a drug. Its not like saying no
to breathing! And its not like smoking around children- that is so clearly dangerous, we all know that.

At one time, smoking was said to be helpful to athletes and was even promoted for athletic performance! The tide turned on
smoking, once someone blew that whistle.
There have been whistle-blowers for vaccines, yet the train for mandates keeps on going. When you look at the incidence of
chronic conditions among children today, you have to ask, Why? Is it our food quality? Is it vaccines? Is it air and water
pollution? Is it chemicals in our homes? Because we dont know for sure, it should not be mandated.

11. What do you think about how vaccines are being pushed - and sometimes even forced - on
everyone?

Margaret: Theyve done a very good job of psychological indoctrination. Most people believe vaccines have saved
millions of lives from HORRIBLE diseases like measles, mumps, and even chickenpox. But when I ask people why they
think those diseases were chosen for vaccines, as opposed to something like HIV, they have no answer. The answer is
simplemaking a vaccine for measles was easy. Making one for HIV is very hard. So drug development went the path of
least resistance.

Then once a vaccine existed, suddenly the disease was proclaimed to be killing millions when it never did. Chickenpox is a
great example. Everyone in my childhood had chickenpox and not one person I knew died or even had serious
complications. By the way, the rationale for the development of the chickenpox vaccine was entirely economic to
avoid parents missing work. It was never about the disease itself being fatal.

But once they had the vaccine, they then proclaimed that chickenpox was such a serious disease.

12. What is your biggest concern about vaccines and our kids today?

Margaret: We dont know the long-term impact of what theyve been given. We know now that there were simian viruses in
the measles vaccines given in the 60s, and those simian viruses were oncogenic, meaning cancer-causing.

There are also some very good animal studies that show an increase in autoimmune diseases in vaccinated primates. I
worry most about the link with autoimmune diseases like MS, Rheumatoid arthritis, and lupus.

13. What would you like parents to know about vaccines?

Margaret: I think people have to stop and take a reality check. Depending on the age of your parents, ask them if they had
measles, mumps, chickenpox, or pertussis. Ask them if it was really bad or if they knew anyone who died. Dont ask about
polio. (Polio, by the way, still exists today under different names, so it was not eradicated by the vaccine, and most cases of
polio are not paralytic.) I asked my own parents, and they said they had all those diseases, and they really werent a big
deal.
The best treatment for measles is vitamin A. Its a disease that is quite mild if you have adequate vitamin A. Everyone used
to know that, which is why so many kids back in the day took Cod Liver oil. Being sick sometimes is a part of life.

We have to decide if were so terrified of ordinary diseases like measles that we would rather vaccinate against it and risk
worse consequences like autoimmune diseases or cancer. Id take measles over cancer any day.

We also need to educate parents that some of these diseases are actually MEANT to happen to children. Having some of
these diseases triggers developmental processes in children. Just like a longitudinal study I saw where it was noted that
children had growth spurts after they recovered from being ill. Being sick occasionally may actually be necessary for normal
development.

14. What do you think needs to change in mainstream medicine?

Margaret: Stop the guidelines. Doctors are now reimbursed on their adherence to guidelines, which is why they
push vaccines. They are paid less by insurance carriers if their vaccine rates decline, so they kick patients out who wont
do what theyre told to do.

Thats why you should offer to pay cash (if you can) when you see your doctors so that they have less incentive to
promote these things on you.
And stop allowing the marketing of drugs to the public. When that was approved, all of this craziness was unleashed.
Its been very detrimental ever since, because the media will never question something they make money from. Once
they no longer make advertising money from drug companies, then the real questions will be asked.

If people think the only reason any drug or vaccine was developed was to do good, they need to think again. Drug
companies have marketing departments just like any other industry. Its all about sales and how to convince (or force) you to
take this drug, or get that vaccine.

Duke Study Finds A "Legacy Of Radioactivity," Contamination From Thousands Of

Fracking Wastewater Spills
June 3 2016 | From: Desmog

Years of lax policy making and too many wells being inspected by too few officials means that a
massive amount of pollution is being pumped into the wilderness of North Dakota.
Thousands of oil and gas industry wastewater spills in North Dakota have caused widespread contamination
from radioactive materials, heavy metals and corrosive salts, putting the health of people and wildlife at risk,
researchers from Duke University concluded in a newly released peer-reviewed study.

Related: Hillary Clintons Energy Initiative Pressed Countries to Embrace Fracking, New Emails Reveal

Some rivers and streams in North Dakota now carry levels of radioactive and toxic materials higher than federal drinking
water standards as a result of wastewater spills, the scientists found after testing near spills.

Many cities and towns draw their drinking water from rivers and streams, though federal law generally requires drinking
water to be treated before it reaches peoples' homes, and the scientists did not test tap water as part of their research.

High levels of lead - the same heavy metal that infamously contaminated water in Flint, Michigan - as well as the radioactive
element radium, were discovered near spill sites. One substance, selenium, was found in the state's waters at levels as high
as 35 times the federal thresholds set to protect fish, mussels, and other wildlife, including those that people eat.
The pollution was found on land as well as in water. The soils in locations where wastewater spilled were laced with
significant levels of radium, and even higher levels of radium were discovered in the ground downstream from the spills'
origin points, showing that radioactive materials were soaking into the ground and building up as spills flowed over the
ground, the researchers said.

The sheer number of spills in the past several years is striking. All told, the Duke University researchers mapped out a total
of over 3,900 accidental spills of oil and gas wastewater in North Dakota alone.

Contamination remained at the oldest spill site tested, where roughly 300 barrels of wastewater were released in a spill four
years before the team of researchers arrived to take samples, demonstrating that any cleanup efforts at the site had been
insufficient.

"Unlike spilled oil, which starts to break down in soil, these spilled brines consist of inorganic chemicals, metals
and salts that are resistant to biodegradation, said Nancy Lauer, a Duke University Ph.D. student who was lead
author of the study, which was published in Environmental Science & Technology.

They don't go away; they stay. This has created a legacy of radioactivity at spill sites, she said.

The highest level of radium the scientists found in soil measured over 4,600 Bequerels per kilogram [bq/kg] which
translates to roughly two and half times the levels of fracking-related radioactive contamination discovered in
Pennsylvania in a 2013 report that drew national attention.
To put those numbers in context, under North Dakota law, waste over 185 bq/kg is considered too radioactive to dispose in
regular landfills without a special permit or to haul on roads without a specific license from the state.

And that radioactive contamination - in some places over 100 times the levels of radioactivity as found upstream from the
spill - will be here to stay for millennia, the researchers concluded, unless unprecedented spill clean-up efforts are made.

"The results of this study indicate that the water contamination from brine spills is remarkably persistent in the
environment, resulting in elevated levels of salts and trace elements that can be preserved in spill sites for at least
months to years, the study concluded.

The relatively long half-life of [Radium 226] (1600 years) suggests that [Radium] contamination in spill sites will
remain for thousands of years.

Cleanup efforts remain underway at three of the four sites that the Duke University research team sampled, a North Dakota
State Health Department official asked to comment on the research told the Bismarck Tribune, while the fourth site had not
yet been addressed. He criticized the researchers for failing to include any in-depth testing of sites where the most extensive
types of cleanup efforts had been completed.

David Lettermans Rant About Fracking

Related: There Are 'Fracking' Chemicals In Your Toothpaste, Detergents And Ice Cream

The four sites the researchers sampled instead included the locations of two of the biggest spills in the state's history,
including a spill of 2.9 million gallons in January 2015, and two areas where smaller spills occurred in 2011. The samples
from the sites were collected in June 2015, with funding from the National Science Foundation and the Natural Resources
Defense Council, an environmental group.
Over the past decade, roughly 9,700 wells have been drilled in North Dakota's Bakken shale and Bottineu oilfield region -
meaning that there has been over one spill reported to regulators for every three wells drilled.

"Until now, research in many regions of the nation has shown that contamination from fracking has been fairly
sporadic and inconsistent, Avner Vengosh, professor of geochemistry and water quality at Duke's Nicholas School
of the Environment, said when the study was released.

In North Dakota, however, we find it is widespread and persistent, with clear evidence of direct water
contamination from fracking.

Dealing with wastewater generated by drilling and fracking has proved to be one of the shale industry's most intractable
problems. The industry often pumps its toxic waste underground in a process known as wastewater injection.

Every day, roughly 2 billion gallons of oil and gas wastewater are injected into the ground nationwide, the
EPA estimates. Wastewater injection has been linked to swarms of earthquakes that have prompted a series of
legal challenges.

The sheer volume of waste generated by the industry - particularly from the type of high volume horizontal hydraulic
fracturing used to tap shale oil and gas - has often overwhelmed state regulators, especially because federal laws leave the
waste exempt from hazardous waste handling laws, no matter how toxic or dangerous it might be, under an exception for
the industry carved out in the 1980's.
Related: Scientists Conclude That Fracking Contaminates Drinking Water

This leaves policing fracking waste up to state inspectors, and not only do the rules vary widely from state to state, but
enforcing those rules brings its own difficulties.

State inspectors have faced escalating workloads as budgets have often failed to keep pace with the industry's rapid
expansion. In North Dakota, the number of wells per inspector climbed from roughly 359 each in 2012 to 500 per
inspector last year. In other states, the ratios are even more challenging, with Wyoming oil and gas well inspectors being
responsible for more than 2,900 wells in 2015.

And now, with the collapse of oil and gas prices, funds earmarked for oil and gas inspection have also nosedived in many
states.

Lax enforcement may help explain why wastewater spills are so common across the U.S. More than 180 million gallons of
wastewater was spilled between 2009 and 2014, according to an investigation by the Associated Press, which tallied the
amount of wastewater spilled in the 21,651 accidents that were reported to state or federal regulators nationwide during that
time.
The naturally occurring radioactive materials in that wastewater have drawn particular concern, partly because of their
longevity in the environment and partly because the drilling industry enjoys looser federal standards for their radioactive
waste than many other industries.

In January, North Dakota regulators further relaxed their standards for the dumping of radioactive materials, allowing many
landfills in the state to accept drilling waste at levels higher than previously permitted, citing tough economic times
for drillers.

But environmentalists argue that relaxing the rules for radioactive waste disposal could mean that radioactive materials
receive less careful handling.

"If people think this study points to a building tragedy, just wait, Darrell Dorgan, who chairs the North Dakota
Energy Industry Waste Coalition, told the Bismarck Tribune, when the Duke University research was
released. "'The new rules allow radioactive waste that is 10 times more dangerous.
The spills the Duke University researchers identified often resulted from a failure to maintain infrastructure including
pipelines and storage tanks. Roughly half of the wastewater spilled came from failed pipelines, followed by leaks from valves
and other pipe connectors, and then tank leaks or overflows.

But recent floods in Texas's Eagle Ford shale region also highlight the risks that natural disasters in drilling regions might
pose. Texas regulators photographed plumes of contamination around submerged drilling sites, a repeat of similar
incidents in Colorado.

Thats a potential disaster, Dr. Walter Tsou, former president of the American Public Health Association told the Dallas
Morning News.

Risks associated with fracking in flood zones have drawn the attention of some federal agencies in the past, but perhaps not
in a way that locals in affected areas might find helpful.

In 2012, the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Hazard Mitigation Grant Program - a program designed to help
people move away from areas subject to recurring floods - ran into a series of conflicts over oil and gas leases on properties
that would otherwise be offered buy-outs. Some homeowners in Pennsylvania were denied the chance to participate in the
program because of oil and gas leases or pipelines on their properties, as DeSmog previously reported.
In other words, it may be harder for those who have signed oil and gas or pipeline leases to abandon flood-prone areas,
meaning that homeowners whose properties frequently flood could potentially face battles over cleanup costs without aid
from FEMA.

And the newly published research from North Dakota suggests that the less visible brines may ultimately be more of a long-
lasting environmental hazard than the spilled oil.

Even though their study included only leaks that were reported to state regulators, the researchers warned that little is
currently being done to clean up sites where spills have occurred - or even to track smaller spills, especially on reservation
lands, where roughly a quarter of the state's oil is produced.

This means that the real amount of wastewater spilled is likely even higher than currently reported.

"Many smaller spills have also occurred on tribal lands, Prof. Vengosh said, and as far as we know, no one is
monitoring them.

Related: Frackman The Movie Trailer - See The Truth About The Devastation Caused By Fracking

Chemtrail Flu: Have You Got It Yet?

June 1 2016 | From: HealthFreedoms

Youre sick. Your nose is stuffy. Your body aches, Youre sweaty, coughing, sneezing and you
dont have enough energy to get out of bed.
Its not the flu according to Dr. Len Horowitz. His opinion is not based on conspiracy theory but on conspiracy
fact. Over the past 10 years, Horowitz has become Americas most controversial medical authority. A university-
trained medical researcher, Horowitz, 48, charges that elements of the United States government are conspiring
with major pharmaceutical companies to make large segments of the population sick.

Related: Iodine - Suppressed Knowledge That Can Change Your Life

The mainstream media is reporting that hospital emergency rooms are jammed with patients suffering from a bizarre upper
respiratory infection that doesnt quite seem like a virus. They are reporting that its a mystery flu and that the flu vaccines
are ineffective against it.

Thats all hogwash, bogus nonsense, says Dr. Leonard Horowitz. "The fact of the matter is, we have seen this type of an
epidemic since the end of 1998 and the beginning of 1999. People have been hacking and coughing with this bizarre illness
that does not seem to follow any logical viral or bacterial onset and transition period.
If it was a really bacterial or a viral infection, it would have caused a fever but it didnt It lasts for weeks, if not
months. Sinus congestion, sinus drainage, cough, fatigue, general malaise. People have been feeling off.

The Armed Forces Research Institute of Pathology has registered a patent for the pathogenic micoplasma that is
causing the epidemic. You can see the patent report in the book, Healing Codes for the Biblical Apocalypse.

Micoplasma is not really a fungus, its not really a bacteria, its not really a virus. It has no cell wall. It goes deep into the cell
nuclei thereby making it very difficult to mount an immune response against it. Its a man-made biological weapon.The
patent report explains how it causes chronic upper respiratory infections that are virtually identical to whats going on right
now."

Chemtrails Destroy Your Immune Function

I believe the chemtrails are responsible for a chemical intoxication of the public, which would then cause a general
immune suppression, low grade to high grade, depending on exposure. The immune dysfunction allows people to
become susceptible to opportunistic infections, such as this micoplasma and other opportunistic infections, says
Dr. Horowitz.

I first began to investigate chemtrails when some were sprayed over my home in Northern Idaho. I took pictures of
them, and then contacted the Environmental Protection Agency of the state who were clueless and referred me to
the Air Force.
 They got me in touch with Centers for Disease Control Toxicology, and after about a week I received a letter from
one of their chief toxicologists saying, indeed there was some amount of ethylene dibromide in the jet fuel.

Ethylene dibromide is a known human chemical carcinogen that was removed from unleaded gasoline because of
its cancer-causing effects. Now suddenly it has appeared in the jet fuel that high-altitude military aircraft are
emitting!

Ethylene dibromide is coming out of the jet fuels that is causing immune suppression and weakening peoples immune
system. Then youve got a micoplasma microbe or a fungus that causes an upper respiratory illness. Suddenly you develop
a secondary bacterial infection.

Now you get hit with ANTIBIOTICS, and the antibiotics cause your body chemistry to go acidic, so now you get rashes and
other things, your liver gets full of toxins and comes out through your skin in rashes and they get hyperallergenic reactions
associated with the other chemicals.

Related: Chemtrails, Geoengineering, Weather Modification & Weather Warfare

Ive got colleagues in the Bahamas, Bermuda, Toronto, British Columbia all reporting the same bizarre seeding of the
atmosphere. What is going on is just despicable. All of a sudden now youve got human beings completely out of balance
and infected by two, three or four microbial co-factors as well as intoxicated by a variety of different chemicals and youve
got somebody whos going to be chronically ill.

The Black Budget

"The Frank Church Congressional Hearings of 1975 exposed the Central Intelligence Agency biological weapons
 contracting firms Litton Bionetics and the Army Corp of Engineers who were developing and utilizing various
biological weapons on populations. And this is all done under black operations, covert operations, where they get
funding and congressional people are never informed really where this money is going. Its the black budget, says
Horowitz.

And in the contemporary warfare arena, where experts in biological chemical warfare convene and discuss the
ways that are ideal to conduct warfare today, to really take an enemy out, you dont want to kill the people. You
want to produce people who are chronically illand become dependant on the state and totally sap the resources
of the country.

And then you can move in with your military-medical-industrial complex and your international medical-
pharmaceutical cartel. Then you sell these defeated countries all of the pharmaceuticals and chemicals that they
need to maintain any semblance of healthy function.

Theyre completely depleted. They cant put together a military. You create a dependence and thereby you weaken
the population, and weakened populations are easy to control.

So youve got population control, and you make vast fortunes doing it, versus just blowing up a nuclear weapon
and devastating the infrastructure that you own. You and your colleagues own that infrastructure.

You want to get rid of the people. You dont want to get rid of infrastructure

Who's Responsible?

"What Im relating to you now is not speculation. If you were to read the top experts analysis of military warfare,
including The Report From Iron Mountain the Rockefeller family is one of the major players in this conspiracy.
They are one of the major players in world genocide, world population reduction. Thats no mystery anymore."
"When you examine who owns the chemtrail fuel, who are the fuel company directors, suddenly you enter into the
realm of the Rockefeller family and the royal families Standard Oil and British Petroleum. And what are their
other agendas?

Suddenly now you see their documents, showing that they have funded, historically, eugenics, racial hygiene,
genocide, depopulation, family planning, maternal and child health where they make and deliver vaccines, and
contaminated blood supplies.

These are the banksters, the same people who run the blood banking as well as the money banking
industries, says Dr. Horowitz.

I reference a great book by Dr. John Coleman, who worked as a British Secret Service agent at the highest levels.
And he articulated very clearly who was running those companies. It all goes back, ultimately, to the highest level
of the royal family. The Bush family, Rothschild family, the Rockefeller money, and the entire Rockefeller
establishment is based on Rothschild money and royal families.
 If you cant explain it rationally or any other way, I think youve got to begin to consider conspiracy theories and
eliminate the negative label that youve placed on conspiracy theories which have been demonized along with
wholistic medicine.

America's Fourth Reich

The ruling crime families are making vast fortunes off of humanitys suffering. The Rockefellers monopolized American
medicine in the 1920s. They, along with I.G. Farben, Germanys leading industrial organization, held the monopoly on the
worlds chemical and pharmaceutical industries.

The Rockefellers and I.G. Farben worked together before World War II and during World War II. For all practical purposes,
the Rockefellers and I.G. Farben were the Third Reich.

Who else is involved? The Merck Pharmaceutical Company. Their president, George W. Merck, was Americas biological
weapons industry director during World War II. He was personally appointed by President Roosevelt and Secretary of War
Stimson.

The Nazis planned for the New World Order. They even had a term for it neue Ordnung, which means New Order, New
World Order. This today, this New World Order, is the rise of the Fourth Reich. This is precisely what they envisioned and
then carried out on a global scale. The goal of the Fourth Reich is population control and genocide.
99.99 percent of Masons have no clue what theyre really up to at the highest levels. they give you increased knowledge at
every higher degree of Freemasonry. When you get beyond the 33rd degree, you get the highest indoctrination into whats
called the Ancient Arcana, the ancient sacred knowledge described in the book Healing Codes of the Biblical Apocalypse.
Thats where the devil-doers who are running this planet are nesting.

How does a person become that high in the Masonic organization? Through bloodlines. Youve got to be major royalty,
major royalty, ideally a descendent or youve got to be somebody who is very close to the royalty, the major bloodlines.

Who Are They Targeting?

Who are they targeting for genocide? If theres an attempt underway to reduce the population of the planet, why isnt it
happening?

Look at countries like those in Africa, Third World nations that have been heavily targeted with HIV/AIDS. And consider that
73 percent of HIV/AIDS patients in America today are Black or Hispanic. Statistically, 55 percent of gay men in America are
already dead. Are you seeing depopulation specifically targeting minority groups now? Of course. Its happening right now.
Related: Eugenics: Population "Control", New World Order Style

They dont want to totally eliminate populations completely, just certain populations. And isnt it, from their perspective,
wonderful? Theyve got a covert depopulation agenda that nobodys picked up on yet. Its ideally what they want to produce.

Its not just about the money. I think theres a Satanic or evil ideology, because Nixon himself said, referring to the
Rockefellers, its not about money for these people, its about power.

The Monopoly Game

At the end of the Monopoly game, what do you do? One person wins, they own all of the real estate, they own all of the
assets, theyve wiped all the other players out and the game is over. You can out the game away in your closet. But you
dont do that on planet earth.

The person who wins at the end of this World Monopoly Game gets to rearrange the board. And thats precisely what weve
seen in the last year. Youve seen not the biggest fish eating the biggest fish in international commerce, you have seen the
mega-whales eating the mega-whales in these mega-mergers.
All these little companies that are producing your vitamins are a subsidiary of a major conglomerate. Today a Warner
Lambert or Glaxo Wellcom, all of these huge, huge corporations own all the little fish. They buy them out. So, again, now the
game board gets to be changed if they desire, and apparently thats what they desire. Thats their agenda, you can see it.

At the Denver Airport, theres a capstone, in the main terminal building dedicated to the New World Airport Commission by
the Freemasons. And theres a big colorful mural that is dedicated to the extinct human species. And in the foreground,
against the horrific backdrop of flames and destruction, there are three open coffins.

Build Up Your Immune System

Step 1: Detoxification.

Because weve all been fed Babylons harvest and eaten the toxic garbage that comes from Monsanto, Dow Chemical and
Archer Daniel and all their genetically engineered foods and the chemicals and the fluorides and the chlorines we need to
detox. An easy detoxification program using fresh squeezed lemonade that you make with maple syrup and fresh squeezed
lemons and cayenne pepper.

Step 2: Deacidification

To change your bodys chemistry, make it more alkaline. Its only in the acid state that the growth of bacteria, viruses,
fungus, molds, and cancer, cancer cells thrive. They cannot grow in an alkaline environment. What causes your body
chemistry to go acidic and become a breeding ground for the bacterial and infectious agents? Caffeine, nicotine, sugar,
refined carbohydrates, alcohol, pharmaceuticals including antibiotics, red meats, stress are the main causes. Eliminate or
reduce them as much as possible.

Squeeze lemon juice into water. Lemon has a lot of calcium in it and it turns to calcium hydroxide in drinking water. Thats
alkalising. It raises the PH of that water from about 7 to about 8. Hot cayenne pepper is one of the most alkalising agents
you can put in your body. It detoxifies and deacidifies all in one step.

Step 3: Oxygenation

The Rockefeller-directed international banksters, blood banksters and medical monopolists have been busy suppressing
your immune system. You want to raise your blood oxygen levels

Massive Government Study Concludes Cell Phone Radiation Causes Brain Cancer +
The Effects Of Smartphone Light On Your Brain And Body
May 31 2016 | From: NaturalNews / StopSmartMeters / Sott / Various

After decades of denials and attacks by the media which called people concerned about cell phone
radiation "tin foil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists," a massive, multi-year study funded by the
federal government now concludes that yes, cell phone radiation causes brain cancer.
TThe study is published here and it's entitled, "Report of Partial Findings from the National Toxicology Program
Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley SD rats (Whole Body
Exposures)."

Related: New research confirms cell phones cause brain cancer and children are more at risk

"The findings, which chronicle an unprecedented number of rodents subjected to a lifetime of electromagnetic radiation,
present some of the strongest evidence to date that such exposure is associated with the formation of rare cancers in at
least two cell types in the brains and hearts of rats," reports Scientific American:

"The researchers found that as the thousands of rats in the new study were exposed to greater intensities of RF
radiation, more of them developed rare forms of brain and heart cancer that could not be easily explained away,
exhibiting a direct dose-response relationship. Some of the rats had glioma -- a tumor of the glial cells in the brain -
- or schwannoma of the heart.

Furthering concern about the findings: In prior epidemiological studies of humans and cell phone exposure, both
types of tumors have also cropped up as associations. In contrast, none of the control rats -- those not exposed to
the radiation -- developed such tumors.

Consumer Reports also authored this story published on Yahoo Finance, which states, "The tumors found were
gliomas (in the brain), and schwannomas (of the heart)." That same story goes on to report:

[T]he current study, which found the same types of tumors in rats that the earlier epidemiological research found in
humans, was a controlled clinical trial; it was specifically designed to simulate the exposures of cell phone users,
and all of the important parameters were tightly controlled and carefully monitored.

Rats and mice were exposed to the same kinds of radiation used in cell phones, for roughly nine hours each day,
spread over the course of the day."

Another Government Cover-Up Shattered

In other words, the cell phone industry can no longer claim it's "bad science." This is rigorous science, and it shows a
clear, dose-related causative link between exposure to cell phone radiation and the development of brain and heart tumors.

For decades, the government has actively conspired with industry to downplay any evidence linking cell phones to cancer.
We see this across the federal government, of course, with the EPA downplaying the risks of pesticides, the FDA
downplaying the risks of pharmaceuticals, the CDC downplaying the risks of vaccines and the USDA downplaying the risks
of genetically engineered crops.

The entire federal government as it operates today is little more than the science propaganda and marketing arm of
private industry. (Corporate-government collusion, by the way, is better known as economic Fascism.)

In all this, the role of the government-controlled media has long been to ridicule anyone who questions the official
science propaganda on all these topics.

Think cell phones cause cancer? You're a kook. Worried about fluoride in the tap water? You're a nut case. Concerned
about mercury in vaccines? You're an anti-science quack, we're told.

Except that now the truth is being exposed on all these fronts.

Now, even the government's own study shows that cell phone radiation causes cancerous tumors of the brain and heart. At
the same time, independent science is increasingly exposing the harm of mercury in vaccines, GM crop chemicals
like glyphosate, toxic pharmaceuticals and the mass fluoride poisoning of the water supply.

On all these issues, Natural News has always been right! (... and the establishment has always been in denial of reality.)

The CDC, for its conspiratorial part, yanked warnings about cell phone radiation from its website. (It's the Ministry of Truth,
you see, and preventing the public from learning the truth is always the CDC's No. 1 priority...)

As Consumer Reports says in its story:

"The results of this large, long-term study could dramatically shift the national debate over cell phone safety. The
NTP's website says that the results may be used by the Food and Drug Administration and the FTC in determining
how best to protect consumers from the potential harms of radiation that comes from cell phones.

The CDC might also consider reinstating the cautions it pulled from its web site. (We've reached out to the agency
for comment, and will update our story once we hear back from them).

Likewise, the cell phone industry may have to alter its stance. The wireless association trade group CTIA has
maintained that cell phones are completely safe, and has fought to block San Francisco from passing laws that
would require electronics retailers to notify consumers about the proper handling of cell phones."

Related: Live Blood Analysis - Observable Effects of RF/MW Radiation via Smart Meters
Related Articles:

Hang up? Major US study finds link between cancer and cellphone radiation

Mobile phones linked to cancer in groundbreaking study

The Effects Of Smartphone Light On Your Brain And Body

You might not know this, but your smartphone emits a bright blue light which allows you to read
what's on the screen even during the brightest points of the day.

But the light doesn't turn off or adjust according to the hour of the day; it's continually emitted, not only by our
smartphones, but by our laptops, televisions, and other devices as well. The problem is that this light, which
mimics the brightness of the sun, confuses your brain into thinking it's daytime, even during the dead of night.

This in turn stops your brain from releasing melatonin, the hormone which induces sleep, and prevents you from falling
asleep. This is why experts recommend to turn off all screens at least two hours before bed.

Melatonin is released by a tiny organ in your brain called the pineal gland a couple of hours prior to sleep. The science of
why the blue light emitted by mobile devices keeps people awake has led to the discovery of a photoreceptor called
Melanopsin.

Though we've long been familiar with the various cones and rods that construct our vision, Melanopsin was discovered
recently in retinal ganglion cells, which are sensitive to blue light. Since then, experimental research has found that the
average person using mobile devices before bed may have difficulty falling and/or staying asleep.
The impact of blue light is even more significant for teenagers, who are more vulnerable to the effects of light than adults.
This is because circadian rhythm naturally shifts during adolescence, causing teenagers to feel more awake late into the
night. Starting up a video game or television show just before bedtime could be enough to push sleepiness away for another
hour or two, making early mornings particularly difficult.

Blue Light Isn't The Only Concern

Dr. Martin Blank from the Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics at Colombia University has joined a group of
scientists from around the world who are making an international appeal to the United Nations regarding the dangers
associated with various electromagnetic emitting devices, like cellphones and WiFi.
There are multiple concerns with these devices, including their link to cancer. More concerning still is the fact that a
child's brain absorbs up to four times as much radiation as that of an adult, and children today are growing up with
these devices in hand. You can read more details about this here.

Related: 'Casualty catastrophe': cell phones and child brains

Our love for our screens is in itself a problem. In China, screen addiction is actually considered a clinical disorder, and as a
result a number of rehabilitation centres have been established where young people addicted to screens are completely
isolated from all media. Although the success of these treatment centres has yet to be established, their necessity paints a
dark picture of the technological age in which we live. (source)

What You Can Do

The first thing you can do is limit your screen time before bed, turning all screens off at least two hours before you plan to
fall asleep. This is the perfect time to catch up on your reading.

You can also download an app called f.lux, which adjusts the colour of your computer's display to the time of day - warm at
night and brighter during the day - and cuts the blue light being emitted. There are similar apps for phones as well. All of us
here at CE use these apps and have really noticed an improvement in our sleep quality.
Here is a page from their website that provides more research into what staring at screens can do to your sleep, as well as
the science behind the f.lux app.

Regardless of whether you are worried about your sleep, we can all benefit from a daily break from our smartphones and
other screens.

Related Articles:

Court rules cell phones are causing brain tumors

New Study: 30 minutes exposure to 4G cell phone radiation affects brain activity

How cell phone radiation exposure affects the blood

Iodine - Suppressed Knowledge That Can Change Your Life

May 30 2016 | From: Sott

Given the highly toxic state most people find themselves in, the rapidly changing environment
which we live in, and the incredible ability that iodine has to strengthen people's health and
improve their lives, I decided to write the following summary about iodine supplementation as an
introduction to the subject.

The information presented here is based on preliminary research available on this forum discussion thread on
iodine and on the books Iodine: Why You Need It, Why You Can't Live Without It (5th Edition) by Dr. Brownstein,
and The Iodine Crisis by Lynne Farrow.

Related: Iodine: The Miracle Mineral For Brain, Body And Spirit

Iodine is an essential micro-nutrient. This means every single cell of every single person needs it. Evolutionary
biologists reckon that seafood consumption, and thus iodine absorption, played an important role in human brain
development and evolution. Iodine also has excellent antibacterial, anticancer, antiparasitic, antifungal, and antiviral
properties.

Unfortunately, iodine deficiency in the general population is of pandemic proportions in our modern world due to
iodine's displacement in our bodies by environmental toxins such as bromide, pesticides, and food additives. Modern
farming techniques have also led to deficiencies of iodine and other minerals in the soil. Thus, crops grown in iodine-
deficient soil are deficient in iodine.

Certain diets and lifestyles can also predispose a person to develop iodine deficiency. Those who eat a lot of bakery
products (breads, pasta, etc), which contain high amounts of bromide, are at risk. So are vegetarians and those who don't
like sea food, sea vegetables or salt.

According to Dr. Brownstein, author of Iodine: Why You Need It, Why You Can't Live Without It, about one-third of the global
populations live in a region of iodine deficiency. He and other iodine researchers have tested thousands of people, and
found consistent results: approximately 96% of patients test low for iodine.
The World Health Organization has recognized that iodine deficiency is the world's greatest single cause of preventable
mental retardation. Iodine deficiency has been identified as a significant public health problem in 129 countries and up to
72% of the world's population is affected by an iodine deficiency disorder.

The following illnesses are related to iodine deficiency:

Breast cancer
Thyroid cancer
Ovarian cancer
Uterus cancer
Prostate cancer
Autoimmune thyroid illnesses
Hypothyroidism
Fibrocystic breast disease
ADHD
Chronic fatigue
Fibromyalgia

What's more, iodine has been used to treat the following conditions:

ADHD/ADD
Atherosclerosis
Breast diseases
Dupuytren's conctracture
Excess mucous production
Fibrocystic breasts
Goiter
Hemorrhoids
Headaches and migraine headaches
Fibromyalgia
Chronic fatigue
Hypertension
Infections
Keloids
 Liver diseases
Nephrotic syndrome
Ovarian disease
Parotid duct stones
Peyronie's disease
Prostate disorders
Sebaceous cysts
Thyroid disorders
Vaginal infections
Syphilis
Uterine fibroids
Heavy metal poisoning (mercury, lead, arsenic)
Scarlet fever
Bronchitis and pneumonia
Obesity
Depression
Breast pain
Eczema
Malaria
Genito-urinary diseases
Rheumatism
Tonsillitis
Cough
Stomach pains
Brain fog
Allergies
Menstrual irregularities
Gum infection
Psoriasis
Heart arrhythmia
High cholesterol
Constipation
Hair thinning
Type 2 diabetes
Eye problems
GERD
Multiple sclerosis
Gastroparesis
Small intestine bacterial overgrowth

Etc, etc...

The broad cross-section of conditions improved thanks to iodine supplementation is a big clue to the nutrient's
importance and widespread deficiency.

According to Lynne Farrow, author of The Iodine Crisis, iodine's medicinal use dates back 15,000 years. It was the first
treatment of choice in the 19th century for tumors and aggressive diseases of obscure origin. Farrow also argues that the
notion that refined iodized salt is sufficient to meet our daily needs has been the most dangerous misconception about
iodine.
According to Farrow's and Brownstein's research, only 10% of the iodine in salt gets absorbed, at best. Most people today
avoid refined salts due to health concerns, and due to the misconception that salt (of any kind) is bad for cardiovascular
health.

Iodine's RDA is 150mcg (micrograms, which equals 0.15mg), an established calculation based on how much iodine the
thyroid gland needs to avoid goiter. Other organs' requirements aren't factored into this number. In addition to that, the
effects of widespread iodine-blocking pollutants introduced during the last century were never considered in this calculation.

Our Toxic World

Even if you manage to consume some four pounds of fresh seafood daily in order to meet your iodine requirement, you
can't live in a clean bubble on this planet. The Fukushima nuclear plant disaster alone is likely to have contaminated
much of the world's seaweed, an important source of dietary iodine. Then there are the 2,053 nuclear explosions conducted
all over the world from the 1940s to the 1990s, and more recently the depleted uranium munitions used in America's wars.
Let's not forget about Chernobyl either.

It is known that radioactive iodine, used in many medical procedures, will further exacerbate an iodine deficiency problem.
Also, exposure to many chemicals that inhibit iodine binding in the body (e.g., bromide, fluoride, chloride) further
worsens the problem. Many countries still fluoridate their water despite evidence of its health hazards. What's worse is that
fluoride is even more toxic when there is an iodine deficiency.
The good news is that iodine supplementation in the proper amounts increases urinary excretion of heavy metals
such as lead and mercury, and has a detoxifying effect by increasing excretion of fluoride, bromide and chloride
derivatives. This is very important since bromine, fluoride, and chloride are toxic halides, which compete with each other for
absorption and receptor-binding in the body.

Perchlorate - a chlorine compound - damages the iodine transport system in our bodies. It may cause cancer and
weakening of the immune system, even at low levels. Perchlorate is used in countless industrial products - from everyday
applications like car air bags and leather tanning to rocket fuel.

Bromine intoxication is associated with delirium, psychomotor retardation, schizophrenia and hallucinations. People who
ingest bromine feel dull and apathetic and have difficulty concentrating. Bromide can also cause severe depression,
headaches and irritability. These symptoms can be present even with low levels of bromine in the diet.

Dr. Brownstein explains how bromine interferes with iodine utilization in the thyroid, and anywhere else iodine concentrates
in the body. Due to their interference with iodine-binding in the body, bromine and fluoride are known as "goitrogens" - they
promote the formation of goiter. Bromine and fluoride are toxic substances with no therapeutic use in our bodies.
Bromine, a known carcinogen, can also bind to iodine receptors in the breast. Women with breast cancer have much larger
amounts of the toxic halides bromine and fluoride compared to women without breast cancer. On the other hand, iodine has
anti-carcinogenic properties.

Women's breasts are major sites for iodine storage. Maintaining adequate iodine levels are necessary to ensure an
adequately functioning thyroid gland and normal breast architecture, as well as maintaining normal structure in all glands
throughout the body.

As Dr. Brownstein reports:

"All of the glands of the body depend on adequate iodine levels to function optimally. Animal studies have shown
problems with the adrenal glands, the thymus gland, the ovaries, the hypothalamus and pituitary axis, as well as
the entire endocrine system, when there is an iodine deficient state.

In fact, the ovaries have the second highest concentration of iodine in the body next to the thyroid gland. An iodine-
deficient state will lead to an imbalanced hormonal system. lt is impossible to have a balanced hormonal
system without ensuring an adequate iodine intake.

Large amounts of iodine are also stored in many other areas of the body including the salivary glands,
cerebrospinal fluid and the brain, gastric mucosa, choroid plexus,breasts, ovaries, and the ciliary body of
the eye. In the brain, iodine concentrates in the substantia nigra, an area of the brain that has been
associated with Parkinson's disease."

Medical 'Iodo-Phobia'

According to Dr. Guy E. Abraham, 'medical iodophobia' - the unwarranted fear of using and recommending inorganic, non-
radioactive iodine/iodide - may have caused more human misery and death than both World Wars combined by
preventing meaningful clinical research in the daily amount of iodine needed for optimal physical and mental health.

Abraham was one of the world's leading researchers on iodine, suggesting that the required daily intake of iodine necessary
for maintaining iodine sufficiency for the whole body was 13mg per day.
At sufficiency, the thyroid gland holds a total of approximately 50mg of iodine. The thyroid gland needs approximately
6mg/day of iodine for sufficiency.

The breasts need at least 5mg of iodine; that leaves 2mg of iodine for the rest of the body. Others suggest, based on Dr.
Guy E. Abraham's research, that healthy individuals need 1-3 mg/day as a maintenance dose. This is still well above the
RDA of 150ug/day of iodine!

Many healthcare professionals are scared of iodine due to ignorance of its biochemistry and physiology. They've been led
to believe that iodine causes hypothyroidism, when in reality it helps to normalize thyroid function. One of the
reasons for this misconception is due to high TSH levels in iodine therapy. TSH (Thyroid-stimulating hormone) is a test to
monitor thyroid function. It usually rises when there is hypothyroidism. However, as Dr. Brownstein explains:

"TSH has another function besides stimulating thyroid hormone production. It also helps stimulate the body's
production of the iodine transport molecules - the sodium-iodide symporter (NIS). Without adequate
amounts of NIS, iodine would not be able to enter the cells and be utilized. [...]

[An] iodine-deficient patient's body does not require a large amount of NIS since there is little iodine that needs to
be transported into the cells. However, when this individual begins to supplement with iodine, the extra iodine now
needs to be transported into the cells. One way the body will accomplish this is to increase the production of TSH
to stimulate more NIS. [...]

How long does TSH stay elevated? l have found that TSH may remain elevated for up to 6 months before lowering
to normal. How high do TSH levels rise? The normal TSH level ranges from 0.5-4.5mlU/L. l have witnessed TSH
levels elevated to 5-30mlU/L for a period of time sometimes up to six months-before falling back to the normal
range. [...] The TSH will decline back to the reference range after the thyroid gland is saturated with iodine."

Iodine does not cause hypothyroidism. On the contrary, the main thyroid hormones, T4 and T3, require enough iodine in
order to be produced. When an individual is iodine-deficient, hypothyroidism results because there is not enough raw
material to produce T4 and T3.

Supplementing with iodine can improve or even heal hypothyroidism without the use of synthetic drugs. Moreover, research
suggests that taking thyroid hormone when iodine deficiency is present can worsen the iodine deficiency as the body's
metabolic rate increases.

Dr. Brownstein reports how taking thyroid hormone when iodine deficiency is present increases the risk of breast cancer and
possibly other cancers as well. Anything that lowers the body's iodine stores or increases the body's need for it could be
predicted to make things worse.

Another misconception is that iodine is contraindicated in autoimmune thyroid diseases such as Grave's disease and
Hashimoto's. In reality, it is those who are iodine-deficient who are at an increased risk of developing antibodies against the
thyroid gland.

Autoimmune disorders - including thyroid ones - are examples of excess oxidative stress in the body. Oxidative
stress is inflammation in the body and it is akin to a fire burning. You can put the fire out with the appropriate "water": anti-
oxidants, unrefined salt, nutrients, an anti-inflammatory diet (gluten-free, non-GMO, moderated in carbohydrates AND with
plenty of animal fat).

People afflicted with autoimmune thyroid disorders need to take specific nutrients along with iodine in order to heal the
damage done by so much oxidative stress and lack of iodine.

Is there a condition when iodine is actually dangerous? Yes, and it is extremely rare. My main past concerns on
iodine are related to what Dr. Brownstein shared in his book:

"Does iodine therapy cause hyperthyroidism? l was taught in medical school that it did, especially in patients
suffering from autoimmune thyroid disorders such as Graves' or Hashimoto's disease. Young doctors-in-training
are still taught this today. So, let me answer the question: Very rarely.

Between my partners and myself, we estimate that over 12 years, less than 10 patients out of thousands
treated became hyperthyroid when treated with iodine.
 When I lecture to doctors, l tell them one particular condition can predispose to iodine-induced hyperthyroidism.
This condition occurs in a patient who has an autonomously functioning nodule in their thyroid. Sometimes
this is referred to as a hot nodule on a thyroid scan.

An autonomously functioning nodule is not under the feedback control of the pituitary and the hypothalamus.
It functions independently of the thyroid gland. When iodine is present, these nodules can take up the iodine
and produce copious amounts of thyroid hormone leading to hyperthyroidism. This condition can be diagnosed
with a thyroid scan. However, it is most frequently diagnosed after a trial of iodine therapy is given and the
patient becomes hyperthyroid after taking the first couple of doses.

How do you treat a patient with an autonomously functioning thyroid nodule? These patients must avoid iodine
supplements and food (such as seaweed ) that is high in iodine UNTIL the nodule is surgically removed."

Given the pervasive misconceptions about such an extremely beneficial substance as iodine, one may wish to consider how
greater knowledge and use of it may be purposefully suppressed. As has previously been observed and analyzed on
Sott.net, there are numerous ways in which the Western allopathic approach to medicine has led so many individuals astray
on the road to living a truly healthy life.

Among those we've seen are the benefits of a low-carb, high animal fat diet, supplementation with vitamins and other vital
nutrients, the modes and reasons for detoxification, etc.

But given the huge amounts of money and power that Big Pharma and other health-related industries stand to make by
actually keeping people in poor health, it is no wonder that so many of us still are!

Still, at the end of the day, whether the ignorance of the larger modern medical community to employ iodine and other
holistic healing approaches is due to simple ignorance, or more nefarious reasons, the fact is that now, in light of this
invaluable information about iodine, we can choose to take responsibility for our own health with this powerhouse approach.
But the choice is ours to make of course.

Iodine Protocol
Take enough iodine. As mentioned above, the RDA for iodine does not provide nearly enough for the body. Most people
need from 12-50mg/day of a combination of iodine and iodide in the form of lugol's solution or tableted lugol's
solution. Others need much less.

There are several percentages available of lugol's solution, but don't angst over them. You can use the following table as a
rough guide:

Lugol's content per drop Iodine Iodide Total

2% 1.0mg 1.50mg 2.50mg

3% 1.5mg 2.25mg 3.75mg

5% 2.5mg 3.75mg 6.25mg

7% 3.5mg 5.25mg 8.75mg

10% 5.0mg 7.50mg 12.50mg

15% 7.5mg 11.25mg 18.75mg

Start with a single drop of lugol's solution after breakfast and build up by one drop every three days until a balance of
general well being is achieved. Starting with the lowest dose and building up while detox reactions are managed would be
the reasonable thing to do.

Avoid taking lugol after 4pm as it can energize and give insomnia if taken too late. Antimicrobial doses for lugol's solution
and potassium iodide are also discussed in the forum thread on iodine.

Take vitamins B2 (riboflavin) and B3 (niacinamide) in order to stimulate the proper functioning of the NADPH system - this
will help metabolize iodine properly, decrease the formation of damaging auto-antibodies and ensure enough energy
production in the form of ATP. How much? 100mg of B2 and 500mg of B3 twice per day.

Take antioxidants in order to decrease the fire of oxidative damage. Vitamin C 3-10 grams throughout the day. Take 3
grams of vitamin C at least one hour after your lugol dose, preferably two hours later. You can repeat the dose according to
bowel tolerance if there are strong detox reactions triggered by the iodine. Avoid taking vitamin C after 4pm as it can give
insomnia due to its energizing effects.
Take magnesium, 300-600mg per day. Magnesium helps with detox reactions as it participates in +300 detox pathways in
the body. Magnesium also acts against excess intracellular calcium levels which fuel oxidative stress. Magnesium glycinate
is a favored one.

Take selenium or L-selenomethionine 200mcg per day. Safe range: 100mcg-400mcg. Adequate selenium levels are
necessary for regulating thyroid function and iodine metabolism. If selenium is deficient, autoimmune thyroid disorders can
develop. Selenium is important for activating thyroid hormones and it decreases side effects of iodine therapy.

Protect the liver. Take N-acetylcysteine (600-1200mg per day), alpha lipoic acid (200-600mg) or milk thistle.

Drink enough water and take unrefined salted water in order to detoxify bromide. Chloride is an effective competitive
inhibitor of toxic bromide and unrefined salt is sodium chloride. It is impossible to lower bromide compounds in the body if
you don't ingest unrefined salt, some 1-1.5 teaspoons per day. An adequate intake of unrefined salt in the body is also
essential to minimize inflammatory oxidative stress. Take at least 1/4 teaspoon of unrefined salt in 8 oz. of water upon rising
and at least twice a day. Make sure to take your lugol away from the salted water, at least 40 min-1 hour.

In short:
 1/2 to 1 tsp of sea salt in a tall glass of water upon arising.

Lugol's (start with lowest dose) after breakfast or meals, don't take it after 4pm (it energizes you).

200 mg of B2 (riboflavin) per day. Can be taken in two doses with your lugols.

1000 mg of B3 (niacinamide) taken in two doses with lugols.

200 mcg selenium (not more!) ONCE a day with morning dose.

3 to 10 grams of vitamin C - divide into two doses taken an hour after lugols.

500 mg of magnesium - glycinate is excellent - taken at night.

Protect the liver with NAC, ALA and/or milk thistle.

Chest Infections: Bronchial & Pneumonia

Comment: It has been noted that a super supplement combination of Iodine + MSM (see below) + Magnesium is
extermely powerful in defeating the serious and long lasting chest infections that have become prevalent in recent
years.

Related: The Health & Healing Benefits Of Organic Sulphur (Sulfur): MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane)

Detox Troubleshooting

Symptoms of bromide toxicity can be present even with low levels of bromide in the diet. If there is an iodine deficiency,
bromide toxicity is accelerated. Unfortunately, bromide toxicity is very common. It is used as an antibacterial agent for pools
and hot tubs. It is also used in pesticides and in some medications.
Bromide toxicity leads to thyroid problems including autoimmune ones. The body can eliminate bromide only when there is
sufficient iodine available.

One single drop of lugol's solution will start to detoxify the bromide accumulated in your body.

Bromide detox reactions triggered by iodine may include:

Eye lid twitching

Foot twitching
Tingling in hands or feet
Dark thoughts
Depression
Anxiety
Emotionalism
Mouth and tongue sores and cuts
Acne-like lesions (zinc can sometimes help with these)
Skin cuts
Hair loss
Brain fog
Aches
Rash
Metallic taste
Sinus ache
Cherry angiomas
Runny nose
Headache
Sedation
Lethargy
Odd swallowing sensation
Body odor
Unusual urine color or odor
Dry mouth
Urethral spasm
Frequent urination which is commonly mistaken for urinary infection
Diarrhea
Constipation
Vision changes
Irritability
Increased salivation
Dream changes
Hormone changes
Kidney pain
 Breast tenderness

And so forth...

In order to palliate these detox symptoms, make sure you drink enough salted water and take at least the recommended
supplements listed above. You can do pulse-dosing iodine where you stop taking iodine for at least 48 hours to let your body
and kidneys clear out the bromide. Notice that if the detox symptoms developed when you were increasing your iodine dose,
you can always back off your dose to a lower one.

If you have a FIR sauna blanket, you can use it in order to help detoxify any toxic mobilized by the iodine.

Always Do Your Own Research

This article does not constitute medical advice or serve as a substitute for doing your own research to acquire the
appropriate knowledge on iodine therapy.

It is our conclusion that widespread knowledge of the many benefits of iodine is being suppressed. Even if iodine is
generally well known, it has now become clear how grossly undervalued it is and how little is known about its potential to
transform human health.

Further Reading

Iodine: Why You Need It, Why You Can't Live Without It (5th Edition) by Dr. Brownstein.

The Iodine Crisis by Lynne Farrow.

Iodine and Potassium Iodide thread, Cassiopaea forum.

Iodine publications at optimox.com.

Related Articles:

Iodine treats breast cancer and more, overwhelming evidence

Iodine deficiency linked to thyroid and breast cancer, fibrocystic breast disease, infertility, obesity, mental retardation &
halide toxemia
Living in a toxic world: Iodine to the rescue

Iodine for Health

Iodine: An old life-saving medicine - rediscovered!

Comment: We encourage readers to do their own research about this substance and, as always, first consult with their
physician before experimenting with iodine supplementation.

Low-Carbohydrate, High Fat Diet Advice Questioned

May 28 2016 | From: Scoop

Experts are questioning the findings of a new report from UK health charities that has called for an
overhaul of dietary guidelines.

The report, titled Eat Fat, Cut The Carbs and Avoid Snacking To Reverse Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes, was
published by the Public Health Collaboration and the National Obesity Foundation, two UK-based charities.

Citing a number of studies, the authors conclude that a low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet of real foods is an "acceptable,
effective and safe approach" to weight loss and health.

The Science Media Centre gathered the following expert commentary on the report.
 Prof Jim Mann, Professor of Nutrition, University of Otago, comments:

"Eat fat and cut the carbs to reverse obesity and type 2 diabetes' - Such a statement which questions conventional wisdom
and relates to a critically important health issue is bound to attract attention. This is the title on a Report which comes up
with 10 key points, the first two being particularly controversial:

Eating fat doesnt make you fat

Saturated fat doesnt cause heart disease

These suggestions are not new. Does this report, which comes from a group called The National Obesity Forum, provide
confirmation? One should always be open to new information but I would suggest that this report contributes little.

The Forum comprises a group of self-selected individuals most of whom have repeatedly expressed similar views in the lay
and health-related media for many years. They do not represent any recognized professional group and most have not
themselves undertaken relevant research. The report itself is not peer reviewed.

The report is largely based on selective quotations from the relevant literature. There are many mistakes but the reference
(or failure to refer) to the relevant papers commissioned by the Nutrition Guidance Advisory Group of the WHO serves as a
good example.

The report quotes one of the papers by De Souza et al saturated fat intake was not associated with all-cause mortality, CVD
mortality, total CHD, ischaemic stroke, or type 2 diabetes.

However it does not mention the limitations which the authors discuss, nor does it quote the two other studies which may
help to inform WHO opinion and which demonstrated:

(a) that those who choose to restrict their total fat intake tend to have a lower body weight and;

(b) that replacement of saturated fat with unsaturated fat in randomised controlled clinical trials is associated with
a reduced risk of coronary heart disease events.

All these studies were based on meta-analyses which aggregate the results of all available appropriate studies and were
published in world leading peer reviewed journals. The report also does not discuss the limitations of the studies used to
support the arguments.

Also missing is a full consideration of the long term trials comparing different nutritional approaches to weight loss. These
clearly show that although high fat diets may produce a greater weight loss in the short term, in the longer term the extent of
weight loss is dependent on the degree of compliance with the dietary advice regardless of the diet composition, i.e. there is
nothing special about high fat diets.

People lose weight if they reduce their calorie intake assuming their energy expenditure remains unchanged.
There are some points in the report which are perfectly reasonable e.g. you cant outrun a bad diet and industrial
vegetable oils should be avoided and some which are rather more complex than the Report suggests:

For example, it is absolutely true that people at risk of type 2 diabetes need to limit starchy and refined carbohydrates but
this may not apply across the board and needs further explanation, e.g. in China people are consuming less of their
traditional food, i.e. rice and more fat AND they are getting fatter and diabetes rates are increasing dramatically.

If only life was as simple as the self-styled experts suggest!"

Our colleagues at the UK SMC collected the following commentary:

Dr Gunter Kuhnle, nutritional scientist at the University of Reading, comments:

"As with any public health measure, it is important that any recommendations are based on solid evidence, and
take the wider implications of implementation into account. That doesnt seem to be the case in this instance.

There is only very limited evidence on the long-term impact of using dietary fat as the main source of calories.
There are only very few long-term studies, and they do not suggest that cutting back on carbohydrate is as
beneficial to health as it is claimed.

Virtually no research has been carried out to show the impact of recommending a very low carbohydrate diet to the
general public. It could even be very damaging to public health.

The document presents as fact what has not even achieved consensus in the scientific community, such as the
role of fat and carbohydrates, and for which there is only very little evidence.

By doing so, it could confuse consumers, and also make discussions within the scientific community and the
general public more difficult. In the long term, this is likely to have an adverse effect on public health, as it leads to
advice fatigue.
 Obesity and type 2 diabetes are among the most important health challenges we face. Both conditions put a huge
burden on society and the NHS and result in a lot of personal hardship. It is therefore vital that we find ways to
prevent and treat these conditions. The call for more evidence-based nutritional advice is very welcome.

Prof Susan Jebb, Professor of Diet and Population Health at the University of Oxford, comments:

"As the importance of diet as a contributor to ill-health is increasingly recognised, so the evidence has come under
greater scrutiny.

Nutrition is a complex science, and its hard to do classic randomised controlled trials over long enough periods to
observe the effects on heart disease or cancer so we need to combine these studies with observational analyses,
using new statistical techniques such as Mendelian randomisation to help understand if the associations observed
are causal.

Given this diverse evidence base, dietary guidelines need to be based on comprehensive reviews of the totality of
the evidence, assembled and reviewed according to agreed protocols to reduce the chances they may be affected
by personal opinion or other biases.

The new report from the National Obesity Forum fails this standard. It is not a systematic review of all the relevant
evidence, and it does not include any assessment of the methodological quality of the studies. The authors are not
named and it does not seem to have been peer-reviewed.

It should not be confused with other comprehensive reviews of the evidence produced with clear and transparent
processes by organisations such as the World Health Organisation or national bodies such as the Scientific
Advisory Committee on Nutrition or NICE.
 Instead it cherry-picks studies, for example, highlighting one trial suggesting high dairy intake reduced the risk of
obesity, while ignoring a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 trials which concluded that increasing dairy did
not reduce the risk of weight gain.

Prof Tom Sanders, Emeritus Professor of Nutrition and Dietetics at Kings College London, comments:

"This report confuses dietary guidelines for the population with the clinical management of obesity and type 2
diabetes. There is certainly much room for improvement in the clinical management of obesity in the NHS and
there clearly is a need for a debate on how best to manage the diet of patients with type 2 diabetes.

The medical professional certainly needs to get its act together but it is not helpful to slag off the sensible dietary
advice given by Public Health England and the US Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

Dietary guidelines are designed to ensure an adequate intake of nutrients as well as to prevent dietary related
disease. The report wrongly attributes the current obesity/diabetes epidemic to current dietary guidelines. The
report fails to recognize that the main driver is our obesogenic environment and insinuates a sinister plot involving
collusion between government and the food industry.

The truth is, most people now live in metropolitan areas, spend much time travelling to and from work and eat
much more food outside the home. Food is also more widely available, 24 hours a day, portions sizes are bigger
and people are less active because of sedentary occupations (especially sitting in front of a computer) and the
increased use of the car.

The harsh criticism of current dietary guidelines meted out in this report is not justified as few people (~5%) adhere
to these guidelines anyway. There is also good evidence that those that do follow the guidelines have less weight
gain and better health outcomes."

Dr Mike Knapton, Associate Medical Director at the BHF, comments:

"This report is full of ideas and opinion, however it does not offer the robust and comprehensive review of evidence
that would be required for the BHF, as the UKs largest heart research charity, to take it seriously.

This countrys obesity epidemic is not caused by poor dietary guidelines; it is that we are not meeting them. Diets
that are high in saturated fat have been shown to increase cholesterol. High cholesterol is linked to an increased
risk of cardiovascular disease hence why current recommendations emphasise the importance of reducing this.

Heart disease is a multifactorial condition with a range of risk factors and any dietary and lifestyle advice worth
noting should consider the overall impact that our diet and lifestyle has on our health. Focusing on single foods,
nutrients or risk factors is short sighted and will perpetuate confusion and fear amongst the public about what they
should and shouldnt eat to protect their heart health."
 Prof Iain Broom, Director of the Centre for Obesity Research and Epidemiology at Robert Gordon University,
comments:

"At long last there is some sense coming into dietary advice that may eventually lead to improved health, in
particular tacking the double whammy of obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

I totally agree with the document produced jointly by the NOF and the Public Health Collaboration, except for the
statement re zero sugar as all fruits and berries contain sugar no added sugar would be more appropriate.

At the time of the change in food policy in the USA in the late seventies and in the UK in 1983, there was no
evidence to back a reduction in saturated fat in the fight against coronary heart disease, but there was evidence to
link CHD to sugar intake.

A British nutritionist, John Yudkin, at the time tried to prevent such a policy and to shift the blame to sugar and
refined carbohydrate, but was pilloried by Ancel Keyes and the establishment. Decades of nutrition students have
had to undergo training where this unsubstantiated, and now proven false, link between fat intake and CHD,
obesity and diabetes is hammered home.

"We will thus have to undo all of this in the future and to reintroduce the notion that fat in the diet causes neither
obesity, T2DM nor CHD."

Prof Naveed Sattar, Professor of Metabolic Medicine at the University of Glasgow, comments:

"The report has good, bad and ugly elements in it. Yes, its clear that snacking is generally to be avoided; few
would argue against this. Its also clear that some sources of fat will be better than other sources. But to make the
headline message that we should all eat more fat as the cure to reverse obesity trends and thus type 2 diabetes is
NOT warranted based on the totality of evidence.
 In dietary areas, we have few large scale long term trials and so rely a lot on observational data, the results of
which can be interpreted or extrapolated in different ways. Even when we have trials, they are often short term on
weight loss alone or some risk factors and cannot give the longer term reality on long term risks or sustainability of
diets.

The authors of this report have been selective in their choice of evidence to support their arguments and there is
an abundant literature which goes against their conclusions. Indeed, plentiful evidence supports excessive calories
from a variety of sources leading to a rise in obesity with excess fatty foods being a major component of in many
individuals.

Hence, whilst it is good to debate, the reports main headline simply to eat more fat - is highly contentious and
could have adverse public health consequences.

Prof Suzanne Dickson, Professor of Neuroendocrinology at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, comments:

"There are a lot of misleading messages in these guidelines which ultimately do not promote health.

These new guidelines are not in line with those of the World Health Organization.

While it may be good to reduce intake of carbohydrates and sugars, there remains a great body of evidence that it
is equally important to limit intake of fats. These guidelines make no suggestion on what the upper limit of fat
intake should be and without this effectively promote their over-consumption.
 I am not aware of any evidence that common obesity is due to under- or over-production of any hormone.

I am not aware of any hard evidence that snacking causes obesity. There does exist evidence that snacking
causes a compensatory adjustment in caloric intake during the rest of the day. This is not very surprising because
energy balance is under tight physiological control.

It is misleading to suggest that the amount of calories on a plate is irrelevant.

Diets fail because food restriction of any kind leads to reduced metabolism coupled with food cravings that
eventually overpower restraint.

Comment: Clearly the medical establishment are not happy to be challenged. Bearing in mind that for the most
part they would not know which way is up, and that they have all been indoctinated into fallacies since medical
school to prescribe pharmaceuticals and push allopathic medicine which is nothing but profit-driven.

For a segment of society who believe they are so smart they sure do a good job of makling themselves look stupid.

Related: The Secret To Health By Dr. Edward F. Group

Related: Clive de Carle: How You Can Restore Your Health, Enabling Your Body To Self-Repair From Virtually Any
Disease Or Affliction

The Surprisingly Dramatic Role Of Nutrition In Mental Health

May 26 2016 | From: Tedx

In New Zealand, one in seven young people will experience a significant depressive episode before
the age of 24. Mental illness doesnt discriminate against age, gender, ethnicity or social or
economic markers such as income or region.
Mental illnesses can range from depression and anxiety through to eating disorders, schizophrenia, bipolar
disorder and postpartum illness. For those affected by mental illness and their loved ones, there isnt a lot you
wouldnt do to provide symptomatic relief from this dark and dangerous place.

This talk was given at a local TEDx event, produced independently of the TED Conferences. In this critically important talk,
clinical psychologist Julia Rucklidge explores a range of scientific research, including her own, showing the significant role
played by nutrition in mental health or illness.

Rates of all kinds of mental health problems are on the increase. Could something as simple as micronutrients be a useful
tool in the prevention and treatment of mental illness in a society fuelled by nutrient-poor processed food, and stressful
lifestyles? Could micronutrients help bring balance back into our lives?

The New Zealand Wellness Association asks you to watch this 18 minute TEDx Talk above by Professor Julia Rucklidge
from the University of Canterbury. The information contained in this clip has the power to impact the mental health of you
and your family.

The research shows significant and lasting results can be achieved using natural health products to treat nutrient
deficiencies in those people suffering from mental illness. The research has also documented a superb safety record of the
micronutrients. The products being researched are currently under threat.

There is currently a Bill, called the Natural Health and Supplementary Products Bill, in its final reading in Parliament which
could halt access to the nutrients used in these trials and seriously compromise the ability to continue with this line of
research. Why would MPs who are genuinely interested in the well being of their constituents vote for a Bill like this?

Why would MPs who are genuinely interested in the well being of their constituents vote for a Bill like this?

ANSWER - They do not understand the Bill or its implications. They do not have the time to understand all the legislation
they are asked to vote on. We do not believe they would say yes if they understood.

This Bill is not proportional with the risks therapeutic supplements present, and it prevents integrative and natural medical
practitioners from providing adequate care for their patients.

The Bill will place a regulatory ban on many natural products or the maximum dosage of any ingredient currently being used
to treat mental illness.
This is because these ingredients arent listed on the Permitted Ingredients List. To design a product and apply to have it
added to the permitted ingredients list, or be registered as a medicine, would cost significant time and money, neither of
which independent researchers and product developers have.

Coupled with the fact there is no patent protection for a new product, this Bill acts to stifle innovation in the field of natural
medicine when helping this critical group of people.

The New Zealand Wellness Association is pro responsible, and sensible regulation. We ask you to consider the impact that
this Bill will have on the rights of New Zealanders and those around you with mental illness, to have access to nutrients to
prevent and treat illness.

Protect your access to safe and therapeutic natural health products in New Zealand: Please sign
our Petition

Related: Natural Health Products Bill: Important Update

You can find out more about this issue at our facebook page; The New Zealand Wellness Association. Like our page to stay
up to date on this issue.

You can read more about the Natural Health and Supplements Bill here.

Julia J Rucklidge, PhD is a Professor of Clinical Psychology in the Department of Psychology at the University of
Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Originally from Toronto, she did her training in neurobiology (McGill) and Clinical
Psychology (University of Calgary).

Her interests in nutrition and mental illness grew out of her own research showing poor outcomes for children with significant
psychiatric illness despite receiving conventional treatments for their conditions. For the last 6 years, she has been
investigating the role of micronutrients in the expression of mental illness, specifically ADHD, Bipolar Disorder, anxiety and
more recently, stress and PTSD associated with the Canterbury earthquakes.
The 20 Biggest Cancer Lies You've Been Brainwashed To Believe By The For-Profit
Cancer Industry + Cancer Cures Exposed: Natural Medicine Revealed As The Answer
May 24 2016 | From: NaturalNews / GreenMedInfo

You've been taught all sorts of lies about cancer by the "cancer profiteers" - the institutions,
cancer doctors, oncology centers and chemotherapy drug makers who profit from cancer.

In order to keep their profits flowing, they have to keep you in the dark about cancer truths: How it originates, how
it can be prevented and how it can even be reversed!

Related: Disturbing: Researchers Finally Confirm That Cancer Is A Purely Man-Made Disease

If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with cancer (or even suspect you might have cancer), it's crucial to learn how the
for-profit cancer industry has been lying to you. Remember, cancer doctors like the criminal oncologist Dr. Farid Fatafalsely
diagnosed people with cancer to make money off "treating" them with deadly chemicals known as "chemotherapy." Dr.
Fata, who worked out of a state-of-the-art cancer center in Detroit, is now a convicted felon.

Related: U.S. Dept. of Justice publishes horrifying statements from victims of the criminal cancer industry -
Constant, unbearable pain while oncologist made millions

But there are more criminals working inside the cancer industry: Oncologists, cancer surgeons, breast cancer specialists
and mammography con artists. Their goal is to scare you with a false positive diagnosis, then convince you to undergo
surgery, chemotherapy or radiation therapy that you don't even need!

To avoid all that and maybe even save your own life, learn and remember these top 20 biggest cancer lies you've been
brainwashed to believe.

And when you're ready for an even greater dose of the truth about cancer, register for this amazing upcoming summit called
The Truth About Cancer, which begins in just a few days. After hearing these astonishing interviews with pioneering holistic
cancer doctors and researchers, you'll never be victimized by the cancer industry again!

The Top 20 Cancer Lies Told by the Cancer Establishment

LIE #1. Cancer is caused by spontaneous bad luck, not cause and effect
 TRUTH: Cancer always has a cause. There is no such thing as "spontaneous" cancer without cause, and the cancer
doctors who claim such phenomena exist are practicing nothing but "cancer voodoo" or pushing anti-science "disease
magic" rooted in mysticism rather than reality.

LIE #2. There is no cure for cancer

TRUTH: There are thousands of cures for cancer that already exist in the natural world and are being used every day all
across the planet, outside the controlled monopolies of pharmaceutical medicine and toxic chemotherapy.

Your body already knows how to cure cancer! It just needs the resources (and avoidance of toxic chemicals) to accomplish
it.

Related: Incredible Remission of Terminal Cancers with Gerson Therapy

LIE #3. Chemotherapy treats cancer

TRUTH: Chemotherapy is a kind of "chemical carpet-bombing" approach to barbaric medicine that poisons the entire
body. The measurable shrinkage of cancer tumors isn't a "treatment" for cancer at all. Unless the cancer tumor stem cells
are removed or destroyed, the tumor just grows back.
And once the body is poisoned by chemotherapy, its immune response to cancer is permanently compromised, which is
why cancer tends to return in multiple organs within 12-24 months after a person undergoes chemotherapy.

Learn the real story on cancer cures, cancer prevention and cancer industry fraud in The Truth About Cancer docu-series,
beginning in just a few days.

LIE #4. There's no such thing as an anti-cancer food or herb

TRUTH: Anti-cancer medicines have been created by Mother Nature since the beginning of life on our planet. There are
literally thousands of anti-cancer plant nutrients found in the foods at every grocery store (in just the fresh produce section!).
The anti-cancer properties of these powerful foods (like turmeric, garlic, onions, ginger and broccoli) rarely receive any
media attention because they can't be patented and turned into high-profit drugs.

LIE #5) None of the chemicals used in personal care products cause cancer
TRUTH: Popular personal care products are absolutely loaded with cancer-causing chemicals, including hormone
disruptors, known carcinogens and fragrance chemicals that promote mutagenesis.
Nearly all popular laundry detergents and fabric softeners are little more than cancer-causing cocktails of dangerous
chemicals marketed in happy-looking boxes.

LIE #6. Pesticides and herbicides don't cause cancer, either

TRUTH: Pesticides only work because they interfere with metabolic processes and kill organisms. By definition, they are
deadly, or they wouldn't be used as pesticides.
The world's most popular herbicide, glyphosate, is molecularly very similar to VX Nerve Gas, the most toxic substance ever
created by humankind... and developed as a weapon of mass destruction.

LIE #7. You're destined to get cancer and there's nothing you can do to stop it
TRUTH: There's nothing in your genes that programs you to have cancer. Your genetic code is actually a blueprint for
perfect health.
But when your body's cells are bathed in toxic, cancer-causing chemicals found in food and personal care products, it
causes good genes to turn bad (through mutations), leading to cancer. You have remarkable control over your exposure to
(or avoidance of) cancer-causing chemicals.

LIE #8) Cancer doctors want to help you eliminate cancer

TRUTH: Cancer doctors earn huge profits on chemotherapy, surgery and radiation treatments. It is in their financial
interests that you have recurring cancer, creating repeat business for them.
If they helped you eliminate cancer, they would lose your business and lose out on all the money they can make off your
disease!

LIE #9. Mammograms catch cancer early and thereby "save lives"
TRUTH: Mammograms emit ionizing radiation that causes cancer. The more mammograms you get, the more like you are
to eventually be diagnosed with cancer... caused by the mammography!
Additionally, there are so many false positives in mammography that statistics show mammograms ultimately harm 10
women for every 1 woman they might help.

LIE #10. A cancer diagnosis is always true and accurate

TRUTH: Cancer diagnoses are frequently exaggerated or fabricated out of thin air by cancer doctors looking to make
money off medically unjustified cancer treatments. Dr. Farid Fata, for example, was found guilty of criminal fraud for falsely
diagnosing healthy people with cancer at his popular oncology clinic in Detroit.
He deliberately lied to every patient who walked into his clinic, telling them they had cancer and that they would die without
his chemotherapy. He poisoned thousands of people and is now serving time in federal prison for his crimes. (He's just one
of many criminal cancer doctors in the industry...)

LIE #11. The drug companies want to find a cure for cance
TRUTH: The drug companies want to keep milking cancer for profits, and they have no interest whatsoever in eliminating
their revenue stream by curing cancer.
To do so would be financial suicide.

Related: Top 25 pharmaceutical companies by oncology sales

LIE #12. Komen for the Cure raises money to try to eliminate cancer
TRUTH: The corrupt, dishonest Komen group is a front for the cancer industry. It rakes in money from donations and uses
most of it to run mammography clinics in poor, inner city neighborhoods where people can be diagnosed with cancer and
turned over to chemotherapy treatments for sick profits.
Komen for the Cure is running a medical racket and has zero interest in curing cancer. It's the same racket we've been
promised since the 1960s: If we just had a few more billion dollars in funding, we'd find a cure!

LIE #13. Cancer is an "enemy" that has "invaded" your body, and it should be eliminated by
attacking the body with chemical weapons
TRUTH: Cancer is actually just your body's own cells multiplying out of control. It's not something you "catch" or something
that "infects" your body.

Modern medicine's makes a huge mistake in treating cancer like an infectious disease, bombarding the body with chemicals
to try to eradicate the cancer. But the cancer is your body's own cells gone haywire, so to kill the cancer, they have to very
nearly kill YOU at the same time!

LIE #14. Once the drug companies find a cure for cancer, they'll give it to the world for free
TRUTH: The drug companies are interested in profits, not saving humanity. The very idea that drug companies would
spend billions of dollars developing a drug and then give it away for free is laughable.
All these people giving money to "search for the cure" don't realize that the cure will never be released to the world for free,
even if it is ever found in the realm of pharmaceuticals. Drug companies seek profits, and profits come from controlling the
treatments while keeping people diseased. They don't come from finding a cure and releasing it for free.

LIE #15. Having a double mastectomy prevents breast cancer

TRUTH: Chopping off body parts that might someday get cancer is perhaps the most foolish way imaginable to attempt to
avoid the disease.
There's a sexist component to this, too: Ever notice that cancer doctors never tell men to cut off their testicles to prevent
testicular cancer? Maybe they will soon recommend people chop off their own heads to prevent brain cancer, too...

LIE #16. Sunlight causes cancer (and sunscreen prevents it)

TRUTH: Sensible sunlight exposure actually PREVENTS cancer by generating vitamin D in your skin. Most people are
horribly vitamin D deficient, and it's low vitamin D levels that encourage tumors to grow throughout the body.

(This is why most tumor growth happens in the winter, by the way.) Vitamin D is such a powerful nutrient that it alone has
been shown to prevent more than 80% of all cancers. But it has to be consumed in much higher doses than typically used.

LIE #17. The only reason we haven't already cured cancer is because we haven't invested enough
money in it yet
TRUTH: This is the same lie repeated since the 1960s... a claim that the cure for cancer is just around the corner, and we
only need more research money to finally solve it for good.
But what this lie utterly neglects to admit is that the cancer industry isn't interested in a cancer cure. There's far too
much money to be made from cancer patients, cancer donations, cancer research and cancer drugs. Cancer is a multi-
billion-dollar industry, and nobody in the industry is actively trying to make themselves irrelevant.

LIE #18. Modern cancer treatments are highly effective and backed by scientific evidence of their
efficacy and safety
TRUTH: The real scientific evidence shows that chemotherapy only works on about 2% of cancers. For the other 98% of
patients receiving chemo, it's just a deadly poison that damages their heart, liver, brain and kidneys.
(See Questioning Chemotherapy by Ralph Moss.) As with nearly everything in the pharmaceutical industry, the scientific
"evidence" on cancer treatments is distorted or fabricated to favor the financial interests of the drug industry.

LIE #19. There is no link between diet and cancer

TRUTH: Unless you are a smoker, what you eat is the #1 determining factor of whether you get cancer or avoid it.

The foods you consume daily have a direct, measurable and irrefutable influence on cancer: either preventing it or causing
it.

LIE #20. The cancer industry wants to put itself out of business
TRUTH: Ultimately, the "great lie" of the cancer industry is that it wants to make itself obsolete by solving
cancer.This lie is predicated on the laughable premise that every cancer expert, cancer doctor, cancer non-profit, cancer
research facility and cancer drug company wants to bankrupt itself by eliminating cancer forever.

Do you think that pharmaceutical companies making billions a year from oncology products would give away a
cancer cure for free?
Any intelligent person knows that people who are steeped in the profit of cancer will never give up those profits, even if it
means making sure people stay sick and diseased. (Your suffering is no concern to them. They need profits!)

Cancer Cures Exposed: Natural Medicine Revealed As The Answer

Natural cures for cancer not only exist, but have a huge body of scientific literature supporting them. Why don't
more know about it? Both GreenMedInfo.com and Ty Bollinger's documentary, The Truth About Cancer, provide a
powerful combination of awareness raising tools to help move the paradigm of cancer prevention and treatment
out of the Dark Ages into a compassionate, natural, effective and affordable, root cause resolution approach.

Related: 'Oops... It Wasn't Cancer After All,' Admits The National Cancer Institute/JAMA

GreenMedInfo.com's #1 health advocacy is cancer, measured both by the sheer density of research we have collected
and reported on the subject over the past seven years, and the primary interest of our user base measured by traffic to
cancer related topics, which includes an average of over one million unique visitors monthly.

Our cancer database - a byproduct of a decade of work - now contains thousands of abstracts from published studies
documenting the therapeutic or preventive value of natural interventions for cancer, as well as the unintended adverse
effects of conventional appraoches.

You can view this free resource here. We also report regularly on the under appreciated role
of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, as well as cancer misclassification, in the present day epidemic that will directly
affect 1 in every 4 people.

Another topic is the dangers and even cancer-promoting effects of chemotherapy and radiation, with one FDA
approved chemotherapy costing 4,000 times more than the weight of gold, even though it was never clinically
demonstrated to be effective in a placebo-controlled trial, and has deadly side effects. Clearly it is time for a change.
For this reason we are excited to spread the word about one of the most popular and authentic awareness raising events in
the history of cancer advocacy work: A 9-part docu-series titled, 'The Truth About Cancer..A Global Quest', which
interviews on site over 100 doctors, survivors and scientists, who together, break the medical and research community's
'code of silence' and expose the truth about cancer: namely, how to prevent, treat and beat cancer 100% naturally.

Best of all, its free for anyone to watch.

In this groundbreaking series, Sayer Ji, founder of GreenMedInfo.com, reveals the incredible depth of scientific validation
supporting the complementary and alternative (CAM) medical movement, making an appearance in all but one episode.

The Truth About Cancer: A Global Quest Docu-Series - Official Trailer

So, how did the docu-series come about?

Ty Bollinger lost 7 family members to cancer. He decided to uncover why cancer exists. What causes cancer? How does a
person get cancer? How do you stop cancer?

Current statistics show 1 in 2 men, and 1 in 3 women will be diagnosed with cancer. At present, modern solutions for healing
cancer have a documented 2.1% success rate. Which means 1 in 50 people diagnosed with cancer are likely to survive
using popular mainstream methods of healing.

Few people realize how quickly cancer is spreading. In the early 1900's roughly 3 in 100 people were diagnosed with
cancer. Today cancer has spread so quickly 41 in 100 people are expected to die from cancer. Making cancer one of the
worlds leading causes of death.

Lowering Cholesterol Increases The Risk Of Death

May 23 2016 | From: DrMalcolmKendrick
A group of researchers went back through the data from the Minnesota Coronary Experiment run
between 1966 and 1973 in the US on many thousands of participants.

They were, in part stimulated to do this because they had previously looked at the Sydney Diet Heart Study 1966
73. In their own words:

Our recovery and 2013 publication of previously unpublished data from the Sydney Diet Heart Study (SDHS,
1966-73) belatedly showed that replacement of saturated fat with vegetable oil rich in linoleic acid (a
polyunsaturated fat) significantly increased the risks of death from coronary heart disease and all causes, despite
lowering serum cholesterol.

Our recovery of unpublished documents and raw data from another diet-heart trial, the Minnesota Coronary
Experiment, provided us with an opportunity to further evaluate this issue."

Related: 9 Lies About Fat That Destroyed The World's Health

To make this clear. The Sydney Diet Heart Study (SDHS) was set up to show that replacing saturated fat with unsaturated fat
would reduce the risk of heart disease The original researchers who set up and ran the SDHS did not fully publish their data
at the time (one can only speculate as to why this may be so).

When this current group of researchers finally managed to get hold of the full data from the SHDS, it was found that replacing
saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat did lower cholesterol, however:

Replqacement Of Saturated Significantly Increased The Risk Of Death From Coronary Heart Disease And All
Causes.
I am not normally a great fan of capitalisation, and using bold, but I think this statement needed that treatment.

Now, a few years later, the researchers who re-analysed the Sydney Diet Heart Study decided to try and find all the
unpublished data from the Minnesota Coronary Experiment (MCE). (One can again only speculate as to why the original
researchers did not reveal all of their data).

The main points from this re-analysis were the following

Though the MCE intervention lowered serum cholesterol, this did not translate to improved survival

Paradoxically, MCE participants who had greater reductions in serum cholesterol had a higher, rather than lower,
risk of death

Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials do not provide support for the
traditional diet heart hypothesis

Related: At last, the truth: Butter is GOOD for you - and margarine is chemical gunk

I shall paraphrase their findings:

The More The Cholesterol Was Lowered The Greater The Risk Of Death.

The Minnesota Coronary Experiment (MCE), a randomized controlled trial conducted in 1968-73, was the largest
(n=9570) and perhaps the most rigorously executed dietary trial of cholesterol lowering by replacement of saturated
fat with vegetable oil rich in linoleic acid.

The MCE is the only such randomized controlled trial to complete post-mortem assessment of coronary, aortic, and
cerebrovascular atherosclerosis grade and infarct status and the only one to test the clinical effects of increasing
linoleic acid in large prespecified subgroups of women and older adults.
 Those who have read my ramblings over the years will not be in least surprised by
this finding. Because, as you may know by now.

I believe that raised cholesterol has nothing whatsoever to do with the heart
disease. So, this finding is not a paradox to me. It is simply further confirmation of
many, many, other studies which utterly contradict the cholesterol hypothesis.

I would not, however, hold my breath waiting for this study to make any difference
to anything. My current favourite comment on this study comes from an opinion
leader from the British Heart Foundation. It is, as follows:

Professor Jeremy Pearson of the British Heart Foundation commented:

This is an interesting study which shows that decreasing your intake of saturated
fat can have a positive impact in helping lower cholesterol. More research and
longer studies are needed to assess whether or not eating less saturated fat can
reduce your risk of cardiovascular death.

Read and weep gentle readers. Here is a man so completely and utterly convinced of the dangers of saturated fat
consumption and raising blood cholesterol that he is incapable of grasping what this paper is saying. Max plank said
that Science advances one funeral at a time. There is at least one funeral, currently, that I can think would help to move
science along.

Perhaps time from a quote from Professor John Ioannidis, who wrote a rather sad article recently, entitled Evidence-based
medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett.

This is a confession building on a conversation with David Sackett in 2004 when I shared with him some personal
adventures in evidence-based medicine (EBM), the movement that he had spearheaded.

The narrative is expanded with what ensued in the subsequent 12 years. EBM has become far more recognized
and adopted in many places, but not everywhere, for example, it never acquired much influence in the USA.

As EBM became more influential, it was also hijacked to serve agendas different from what it originally aimed for.

Influential randomized trials are largely done by and for the benefit of the industry. Meta-analyses and guidelines
have become a factory, mostly also serving vested interests. National and federal research funds are funnelled
almost exclusively to research with little relevance to health outcomes.

We have supported the growth of principal investigators who excel primarily as managers absorbing more money.
Diagnosis and prognosis research and efforts to individualize treatment have fuelled recurrent spurious promises.

Risk factor epidemiology has excelled in salami-sliced data-dredged articles with gift authorship and has become
adept to dictating policy from spurious evidence. Under market pressure, clinical medicine has been transformed to
finance-based medicine.

In many places, medicine and health care are wasting societal resources and becoming a threat to human well-
being. Science denialism and quacks are also flourishing and leading more people astray in their life choices,
including health. EBM still remains an unmet goal, worthy to be attained."

He concludes:

David, I was a failure when we started this conversation and I am an even bigger failure now, almost 12 years
later. Despite my zealot efforts, my friends and colleagues have not lost their jobs.

The GDP devoted to health care is increasing, spurious trials, and even more spurious meta-analyses are
published at a geometrically increasing pace, conflicted guidelines are more influential than ever, spurious risk
 factors are alive and well, quacks have become even more obnoxious, and approximately 85% of biomedical
research is wasted.

I still enjoy science tremendously, focusing on ideas, rigorous methods, strong mathematics and statistics, working
on my weird (and probably biased) writings alternating with even more desperate poetry, and learning from young,
talented people.

But I am also still fantasizing of some place where the practice of medicine can still be undeniably helpful to human
beings and society at large.

Does it have to be a very remote place in northern Canada close to the Arctic? Or in some isolated beautiful Greek
island where corpses of unfortunate refugees are found on the beach or floating in the water almost every day, as I
am writing this commentary, although no naval battle has been fought?

Is there still a place for rational thinking and for evidence to help humans? Sadly, you cannot answer me any
longer, but I hope that we should not have to escape to the most distant recesses of geography or imagination.

Twenty-five years after its launch, EBM should still be possible to practice anywhere, somewhere - this remains a
worthwhile goal.

David Sackett, the founder of Evidence Based Medicine, is now dead. I presume he is spinning in his grave at what has
happened to medicine and medical research. Which is, currently, not based on any evidence at all. If the evidence does not
fit with the currently dogma it is simply not published.

Does anyone in the higher reaches of the medical establishment actually give a stuff about this? It seems that they do not.
Meanwhile the shelves of our supermarkets groan under the weight of the super-healthy polyunsaturated fat products that we
are encouraged to eat, by the likes of the British Heart Foundation.

Yet, here is what the uncovered evidence from the largest study done in this area is screaming at us:

Greater cholesterol lowering, using polyunsaturated fats, increases the risk of death.

And don't even go there with the Soy - which was a waste material reclassified as a 'food' a couple of decades ago to make money out of selling you
more toxic crap. And beyond that is the GMO Soy... It goes on and on...
So, British Heart Foundation, the question must be asked are you killing people with your advice on saturated fat
consumption? Perhaps you ought to think about changing it, before more people die.

Here is what the BHF currently say about saturated fats:

Swap these for unsaturated fats. Eating too much saturated fat increases the amount of cholesterol in your blood.

Do you have any actual evidence to base this advice on any at all? If so, lets see it. If not, change it.

Natural Health Products Bill: Important Update

May 22 2016 | From: NZJournalOfNaturalMedicine

Regular readers of this website will know that the Natural Health and Supplementary Products bill
(which was recently re-named the Natural Health Products bill) has been causing significant
concern in organisations devoted to protecting health freedom in NZ, including the NZ Health
Trust and the Health Freedom NZ Trust.

As we reported recently, a legal opinion about various aspects of the bill has been obtained. You can read more
about this here.

Related: Effects And Implications For Consumers Of The Natural Health & Supplementary Products Bill

The Supplementary Order Paper (or SOP) which is the latest version of the bill may be read by accessing the April 4th
update from the Health Freedom NZ Trust here.

If you would like to sign the new petition click here.

The Natural Health Products bill and has been through two readings and its third (and final)reading could be coming up very
soon.

If you would like to write to MPs, as the Health Freedom NZ Trust has recommended, a key message to include in your
letter or email is that you would like the current Natural Health Products bill scrapped and replaced with the original
model bill developed by David Sloan and the NZ Health Trust. This model bill had wide industry* and consumer
support.

Information (including email addresses) to help you write to MPs. may be found here.

Updates on the health freedom issue are also shared through our new Facebook page.

*There is an industry group that supports the Natural Health Products bill as it currently stands (its press release may be
read here), however many small businesses are very worried about the potential impact of the regulation on their
businesses. Unlike the industry group which has publicly stated its support for the bill, the businesses that oppose the bill
are not vocal about their concerns.

It would be fair to say that larger, well-established natural health products companies are more likely to favour the current
Natural Health Products bill as it stands because the bill would confer a competitive advantage to to companies that are
already in the industry and would make it harder for new companies to enter the NZ market place. Larger companies could
also gain more market share if smaller companies in the natural health industry were forced out due to inability to meet new
compliance costs.

Related: Important Message Regarding NZ Natural Health And Supplementary Products Bill
Dental, Medical And Climate Lies
May 19 2016 | From: DrSircus

Anyone alive today that believes we are living in a world of truth, justice and love needs to have
their heads examined. We live in a world of lies and half-truths, which are really the same or worse
than outright lies, because they confuse the human mind so much.

Selected not elected

As such rare to non-existent are the politicians who do not lie because they have to swim in a sea of lies to get
anywhere in politics.

Lies cause unmeasurable amounts of human suffering and lead people to early graves. Too often the lies are hidden from
view from the vast majority because there are plenty of people in power who know exactly how to deceive the public through
manipulation of their collective imaginations.

The public media of course is the carrier wave of this manipulation but it is possible to see through the smoke and mirrors if
one invests the energy to do so.
It is impossible to break through to a person who has swallowed the manipulations when they are widely shared, because
these kinds of people feel comfortable and surrounded by others who feel the same. Even in cases where individuals have
been abducted by extreme groups and have to be kidnapped back by parents, when possible, the reprogramming can be
more than difficult. We humans cling to our beliefs no matter what they are.

Big Lies in Dentistry

Wrong beliefs kill yet even professionals cling, even when children die for them. For a first example, let us turn to the world
of dentistry. I have written before about one of the biggest lies that they entertain that effect the broad public in the countries
that put fluoride into the public water systems.

It is a broad lie shared by doctors that poisons are good for us. That poison is safe when actually very dangerous, especially
to the children who are more sensitive than adults are.
Personally I have always liked and trusted all the dentists I have had, even my uncle who started putting in tons of
mercury into my mouth starting at age five.

It was not until I was fifty did I learn the dangers of mercury contamination and the insanity of putting a neurotoxic poison
inches from the brain, and into vaccines, meaning directly into childrens blood streams. Mercury fillings leak badly through
the years causing all kinds of health problems, including cancer, whose cause is not obvious.

A recent horror story from the world of dentistry reminded me of the dangers, lies and insanity of dentistry. A 14-month-old
baby girl died recently after being put under anesthesia for a dental crown procedure on teeth that had cavities.

Daisy Lynn Torres was taken to Austin Childrens Dentistry in North Austin for the "routine" dental procedure, but halfway
through the treatment she died. The mother said';

"You dont take your child into the dentist thinking it will be the last time you see them alive. You should feel
comfortable and safe at the doctor or dentist office never scared for your childs life."

One has to read the news article and read into it to see the deception. There are two glaring ones. First is that anesthesia is
safe when it is extremely dangerous. Moreover, the second is the lack of mention that sugar consumption is the cause of
most cavities in children. White sugar is a poison that causes a host of health problems but the first of them shows up in the
teeth.
We should pay attention to what the mother said at the end of the news report. She said, You should feel comfortable and
safe at the doctor or dentist office never scared for your childs life.

This exposes a broad manipulation in our civilization for the opposite is true. We should always be uncomfortable and
always scared for our childrens lives when we take them to a doctor or dentists office.

Big Lies in Medicine

Doctors kill and maim many more people than dentists do. The biggest lie that I have written about is that vaccines are safe.
When a parent takes their child to a pediatricians office (to a professional terrorist), they are playing Russian roulette with
their childs life.
My first published book was originally titled Cry of the Heart but I eventually changed that to the Terror of Pediatric Medicine,
which I still give away freely. We just recently saw that the CDC has been caught red handed lying about the link between
vaccines and autism.

And anyone who has even a shrivel of intelligence would understand the equally into huge lie about the safety of injecting
mercury into babies and adults alike but that is exactly what we get in the flu vaccine in the United States and in many
vaccines administered in the third world.

The big lie is that pharmaceuticals are safe when in fact in America alone over 100,000 people a year die for properly
prescribed medicines. We could go on all day talking about the different areas of medicine and it is my common assertion
that would be better to go to a gas station for ones health problem than to a doctors office. At least at the gas station they
know what they are doing.

They know to put gas into the gas tank and oil and water where they belong where doctors are working over quicksand
meaning they have no idea of the basic causes of disease (like nutritional deficiencies in basic minerals) and as such they
do nothing to address these fundamental issues.
Just one example to mention in this regard is that surgery is safer when doctors administer magnesium before, during and
after surgical events. Do doctors administer magnesium? Hell no, they are too caught up in their own lies because their
imaginations have been manipulated too.

Global Warming

Incredible that the big liars of our times would stoop so low as to lie about the weather. Whom do they think they are kidding
when they tell us it has never been warmer? It is spring and we are seeing record cold and snow, even down to near the
equator at ten degrees north.

It will feel more like February in places such as New York City, Syracuse and Buffalo, New York; Boston; Burlington,
Vermont; and Portland, Maine, says accuweather.com at the beginning of April.

The cold is expected to linger at least through mid-month, giving us temperatures more like single digit highs anywhere
between 2, 3 C (35.6, 37.4 F) when wed normally be seeing daytime highs of around 10 C (50 F). Sounds like NOOA
and NASA reports of record heat are going out the window.

Global warming mongrels have a serious mental disease that is characterized by deliberately forgetting the most important
aspect of all life on earth as well as its weather and that is the existence of the sun, whose output is in a cyclic decline for
the next few decades. They are sick just like the vaccinationists who just happen to forget that there are dangerous poisons
the pharmaceutical companies put into the vaccines.

Time Magazine and the Guardian both have recently published hysterical articles about the deadly serious threat of sea
level rising because of ice melting in Antarctica.

Unfortunately, for these dishonest media organizations that fact is that Antarctica is gaining not losing ice. According to
NASA the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to
82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.

In addition, another reminder of how warm it isnt. A 142-year monthly April record shattered in Concord, New Hampshire.
Not just for the day, but for the entire month of April. The temperature on Tuesday morning dipped to a bone-chilling 4
degrees Fahrenheit (-15.6 C).

The previous April cold record, 7 F (-13.9 C), had stood since April 1, 1874, during the presidency of Ulysses S. Grant.
Syracuse, York, almost tripled its daily snowfall record on April 3rd with 16.8 cm of snow. This far exceeds the 6 cm that fell
in 1937. Moreover, it is only the fourth snowfall ever recorded in the month of April for the city.
It has been a brutal spring in both the United States and Russia with hard freezes, record low temperatures, and heavy
snowfalls. Farmers are losing crops but our favorite politicians and governmental organizations will not stop getting on the
horn about how warm it is.

Conclusion

Governments are suiciding the trust people have in them, democracy is becoming a cruel joke in Japan, the United States
and Europe. Moreover, the media is showing how dishonest it is and how ready it is to prostitute itself to commercial and
government interests.

Furthermore, with the financial and economic lies compounding everyones problems we are in for a rough ride. Bill
Bonner writes;

"We live in a world of sin and sorrow, infected by a fraudulent democracy, Facebook, and a corrupt money system.
Wheezing, weak, and weary from the exertion of trying to appear normal, the economy staggers on.

Undeniable Evidence From Numerous Studies Proves That Fluoride Causes Cancer
May 19 2016 | From: NaturalNews

The California Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Environmental Health Hazard

Assessment (OEHHA) recently released a document called Evidence on the Carcinogenicity of
Fluoride and Its Salts that highlights the many health hazards caused by the consumption of
fluoride.
And the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) recently submitted a compilation of its own to OEHHA, which is so

Related: The fluoride wars: loving cancer, loving lower IQ

FAN has been working for many years to raise awareness about the toxicity of fluoride, with the eventual goal of getting it
removed from public water supplies. And its most recent efforts involving OEHHA could be the straw that breaks the camel's
back, so to speak, as it has the potential to unleash the truth about fluoride on a massive scale, and spark a revolt against
its use.

According to a recent FAN press release, OEHHA's report was birthed out of an inquiry into the science of fluoride's toxicity.
It is also a prelude to the group's scientific advisory board Carcinogen Identification Committee (CIC) meeting to be held on
October 12 - 13, 2011, which will make a decision on the status of fluoride as a carcinogen.

The OEHHA report already states that:

"Multiple lines of evidence (show) that fluoride is incorporated into bones where it can stimulate cell division of
osteoblasts [bone-forming cells]," an admission that already recognizes fluoride as a cause of bone cancer.

The report goes on to state that fluoride induces:

"Genetic changes other cellular changes leading to malignant transformation, and cellular immune response
thereby increasing the risk of development of osteosarcomas."
To add to this, FAN presented OEHHA with additional studies from the National Research Council (NRC), the National
Toxicology Program (NTP), and several esteemed universities that all illustrate a link between fluoride consumption and
various cancers, including liver and oral cancers, and thyroid follicular cell tumors.

With this mountain of evidence, the only logical conclusion OEHHA can come to in October is that fluoride is a toxic poison -
- and just like lead and other known toxic chemicals already are in California, worthy of being publicly identified as
dangerous.

"While we understand that there will be tremendous pressure put on the CIC and OEHHA by the proponents of
fluoride and fluoridation, we ask that the Committee continue to rely on its high level of scientific knowledge and
integrity when deliberating and reaching a final conclusion on the carcinogenicity status of fluoride and its
salts," wrote FAN as part of its official submission.

To read the entire FAN press release, which contains further details about the cancer studies included, visit:

www.prnewswire.com
Related: Fluorides, the atomic bomb, and a spy

7 Facts About Depression That Will Blow You Away

May 18 2016 | From: KellyBroganMD

A silent tragedy in the history of modern health care is happening right now, but no one is talking
about it.

We have been told a story of depression: that it is caused by a chemical imbalance and cured by a chemical fixa
prescription.

Related: If Youre Feeling Depressed, Anxious, Sad, Or Nervous, Try This Ancient Method For INSTANT Relief

More than 30 million of us take antidepressants, including one in seven women (one in four women of reproductive age).
Millions more are tempted to try them to end chronic, unyielding distress, irritability, and emotional offnesstrapped by an
exhausting inner agitation they cant shake.

It is time, even according to leaders in the field, to let go of this false narrative and take a fresh look at where science is
leading us. The human body interacts in its environment with deep intelligence. Your body creates symptoms for a reason.

Depression is a meaningful symptom of a mismatch, biologically, with lifestyle - we eat a poor diet, harbor too much stress,
lack sufficient physical movement, deprive ourselves of natural sunlight, expose ourselves to environmental toxicants, and
take too many drugs. Inflammation is the language that the body speaks, expressing imbalance, inviting change. We usually
suppress these symptoms with medication but that is like turning off the smoke alarm when you have a fire going on. Lets
get the facts straight:
1. Depression is Often an Inflammatory Condition

Depression is often a manifestation of irregularities in the body that often starts far away from the brain and is not associated
with so-called chemical imbalances.

The medical literature has emphasized the role of inflammation in mental illness for more than twenty years (unfortunately, it
takes an average of 17 years for the data that exposes inefficacy and/or a signal of harm, to trickle down into your doctors
daily routine; a time lag problem that makes medicines standard of care evidence-based only in theory and not practice).

Not a single study has proven that depression is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain. Thats right: there has never
been a human study that successfully links low serotonin levels and depression. Imaging studies, blood and urine tests,
post-mortem suicide assessments, and even animal research have never validated the link between neurotransmitter levels
and depression.

In other words, the serotonin theory of depression is a total myth that has been unjustly supported by the manipulation of
data.

Much to the contrary, high serotonin levels have been linked to a range of problems, including schizophrenia and
autism. So if you think a chemical pill can save, cure, or correct you, youre dead wrong. That is about as misguided as
putting a bandage over a nail stuck in your foot and taking aspirin. Its absolutely missing an opportunity to remove the
splinter and resolve the problem from the source.

2. Antidepressants Have the Potential to Irreversibly Disable the Bodys Natural Healing
Mechanisms

Despite what youve been led to believe, antidepressants have repeatedly been shown in long-term scientific studies to
worsen the course of mental illness - to say nothing of the risks of liver damage, bleeding, weight gain, sexual dysfunction,
and reduced cognitive function they entail.

The dirtiest little secret of all is the fact that antidepressants are among the most difficult drugs to taper from, more so than
alcohol and opiates. While you might call it going through withdrawal, we medical professionals have been instructed to
call it discontinuation syndrome, which can be characterized by fiercely debilitating physical and psychological reactions.
Moreover, antidepressants have a well-established history of causing violent side effects, including suicide and homicide. In
fact, five of the top 10 most violence-inducing drugs have been found to be antidepressants.

3. The Effect of Antidepressants is Not a Cure

Even if we accepted the proposition that these drugs are helpful for some people (82% of which is due to the placebo effect
according to Dr. Irving Kirsch), extrapolating a medical cause from this observation would be akin to saying that shyness is
caused by a deficiency of alcohol, or that headaches are caused by a lack of codeine.

And what about a genetic vulnerability? Is there such thing as a depression gene? In 2003, a study published in Science
suggested that those with genetic variation in their serotonin transporter were three times more likely to be depressed.
But six years later this idea was wiped out by a meta-analysis of 14,000 patients published in the Journal of the American
Medical Association that denied such an association.

4. Most Prescriptions for Antidepressants are Doled Out by Family Doctors - Not Psychiatrists

Seven percent of all visits to a primary care doctor end with an antidepressant and almost three-quarters of the
prescriptions are written without a specific diagnosis.

Whats more, when the Department of Mental Health at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health did its own
examination into the prevalence of mental disorders, it found that most people who take antidepressants never meet the
medical criteria for a bona fide diagnosis of major depression, and many who are given antidepressants for things like OCD,
panic disorder, social phobia, and anxiety also dont qualify as actually having these conditions.

5. Many Physical Conditions Mimic Psychiatric Symptoms

Many different physical conditions create psychiatric symptoms but arent themselves psychiatric. Two prime
examples: dysfunctioning thyroid and blood sugar chaos.
We think (because our doctors think) that we need to cure the brain, but in reality we need to look at the whole bodys
ecosystem: intestinal health, hormonal interactions, the immune system and autoimmune disorders, blood sugar balance,
and toxicant exposure.

6. Basic Lifestyle Interventions Can Facilitate the Bodys Powerful Self-Healing Mechanisms to End
Depression

Dietary modifications (more healthy fats and less sugar, dairy, and gluten); natural supplements like B
vitamins and probiotics that dont require a prescription and can even be delivered through certain foods; minimizing
exposures to biology-disrupting toxicants like fluoride in tap water, chemicals in common drugs like Tylenol and statins, and
fragrances in cosmetics; harnessing the power of sufficient sleep and physical movement; and behavioral techniques aimed
at promoting the relaxation response.

7. Depression is a Message and an Opportunity

Its a sign for us to stop and figure out whats causing our imbalance rather than just masking, suppressing, or rerouting the
symptoms. Its a chance to choose a new story, to engage in radical transformation, to say yes to a different life experience.
Join the revolution. Find out more in A Mind of Your Own: How Women Can Heal Their Bodies to Reclaim Their Lives.

Kelly Brogan, MD, is a Manhattan-based holistic womens health psychiatrist, author of the book, A Mind of Your Own, and
co-editor of the landmark textbook, Integrative Therapies for Depression.

She completed her psychiatric training and fellowship at NYU Medical Center after graduating from Cornell University
Medical College, and has a B.S. from MIT in Systems Neuroscience. She is board certified in psychiatry, psychosomatic
medicine, and integrative holistic medicine, and is specialized in a root-cause resolution approach to psychiatric syndromes
and symptoms. She is a mother of two.

Shocking U.S. Death Chart Reveals Root Cause Of Most Mortality Comes From
Prescriptions And Food Chemicals
May 17 2016 | From: NaturalNews

With 100,000 deaths and 2 million injuries each year being caused by legal prescription drugs in
the United States, and with 1.5 million Americans contracting cancer each year, the pharmaceutical
and biotech industries have become far more of a threat of "terrorism" to Americans than any
people or other country could be, or have been, to this day.
In fact, just a few years ago, according to a 10-year-long study, accidental overdose deaths in New Mexico caused
by prescription drugs increased at a HIGHER RATE than those caused by illegal drugs heroin and cocaine. That's
disgusting.

Related: Antibiotics given to children causes them to become OBESE later in life, research shows

Actual poisoning from prescription drugs has RISEN to become the second-largest cause of unintentional deaths in the
US, according to the CDC themselves. When did the increase really gain so much momentum?

In its Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, researchers found that deaths from prescription drugs nearly doubled in the
US from 1999 to 2004. This mortality data was collected from the National Vital Statistics System.

On the lighter side, statistics from the U.S. National Poison Data System have revealed, in a 174-page detailed report, that
the number of Americans actually killed in 2009 by vitamins, minerals, amino acids or herbal supplements was exactly zero.
Yes, you read that correctly... zero.
Well, we were using these "alternative" 'natural' remedies for, oh, I don't know, maybe thousands of years before the pharmaceutical industry came
along - were we not?

On top of that, data shows that not even one single death was caused by a dietary supplement in the prior year of 2008.
The annual report published in the journal Clinical Toxicology shows zero deaths from taking any of the vitamins A, B, C, D
or E.

That full report also states zero deaths from any other vitamins.

Deaths in the US from auto wrecks: Nearly 30,000 per year.

Deaths from cancer: At least 1.5 million Americans get cancer each year, and more than half die from it. That's 750,000
people dying of a preventable and curable disorder of the cells, including children and babies.

Deaths from heart disease: 375,000 people a year in US.

Deaths from strokes: 140,000 per year.

Deaths from Alzheimer's and Dementia: The sixth leading cause of death that has a grip on five million Americans right
now kills one in every three seniors.

Deaths from chemotherapy: More patients are dying from associated symptoms of chemotherapy and radiation than the
cancer itself. On July 10, 2015, Detroit-area oncologist Farid Fata, M.D., was sentenced to 45 years in prison for
administering chemotherapy on healthy patients, some of whom died, and for defrauding Medicare and private insurance
companies to the tune of $34 million in filed claims. Fata plead guilty (less than a year ago) to 13 counts of health care
fraud, two counts of money laundering and one count of conspiracy involving kickbacks.

More Alarming Statistics

Number of people unnecessarily exposed to hospitals? Pushing 9 million a year. Antibiotics improperly prescribed for viral
infections? 20 million.

Total number of deaths from vaccines and flu shots: Unknown. The CDC will NEVER publish this statistic.
Deaths from consuming GMOs? Unknown, but cancer and Alzheimer's are on the rise.

US annual deaths from domestic violence: About 1,300 per year.

Now the good news: No deaths from marijuana, hemp seed oil, cannabis (CBD). In late December 2015, the National
Center for Health Statistics at the CDC released its yearly statistics revealing overdose death rates from various (legal and
illegal) drugs, and the death count from marijuana remained the same as for the year before: exactly zero. Not one single
person died from smoking or ingesting marijuana, and no one on record ever has. And there's more good news...

Related: Marijuana Could Literally Replace These 5 Prescription Drugs

Total Deaths From Vitamins, Minerals, Amino Acids and Herbs?

Zero Deaths from natural plant-based medicines and supplements is zero, and so now the big question how many lives
have natural remedies SAVED?

Who's counting? Can we?

What we do know is that deaths from chemical consumption, whether by food, water, personal care products, inhalants,
prescriptions or chemotherapy, are on the rise, and with the spread of GMOs, and superbugs in hospitals, and forced
vaccination by a pharma-led government, and the majority of food mutated by the biotech cabal of corporations, you simply
cannot afford to live in the dark. Get smart, eat clean, take only clean food as medicine, and enjoy longevity.

How Processed Foods Wreak Havoc On Your Health

May 16 2016 | From: OrganicConsumers

Many people probably cant recall the last time they ate a meal prepared entirely from wholesome,
farm-to-table ingredients, without any canned or prepackaged products.
Thats because most Westerners today consume mostly processed foods - foods produced with pesticides, GMOs
and synthetic chemicals, routinely laced with too much sugar, salt and unhealthy fats.

Related: FDA Has Known Processed Meat Causes Cancer Since The 1970s, But Continues To Cover Up Truth To
Protect Meat

In fact, processed foods make up as much as 70 percent of peoples diets - meaning only 30 percent of what they consume
consists of wholesome, natural, or organic foods!

But heres the truth about processed foods: Long-term consumption of these food products spell bad news for your health.

Processed vs. ultra-processed: Whats the difference?

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines processed food as any raw agricultural commodity that has been
subjected to processing methods, including canning, cooking, dehydration, freezing or milling.

This means that the only time a food can be classified as fresh is when youve taken it straight from the source (washing it
is okay, and would not be classified as a form of processing) and eaten it. By this definition, most foods would be considered
processed.
However, in laymans terms, processed foods can refer to sodas, potato chips, candy, baked pastries with extended shelf
life - basically, convenient, easy-to-eat products that have been altered through the addition of artificial or ingredients,
synthetic flavorings, fillers and chemical or genetically engineered additives.

But this type of description actually refers to ultra-processed food. Researchers from the University of So Paulo and Tufts
University define ultra-processed as:

Formulations of several ingredients which, besides salt, sugar, oils, and fats, include food substances not used in culinary
preparations, in particular, flavors, colors, sweeteners, emulsifiers and other additives used to imitate sensorial qualities of
unprocessed or minimally processed foods and their culinary preparations or to disguise undesirable qualities of the final
product.
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

But most people use the term processed food and ultra-processed food interchangeably when talking about these
consumer products. Conventional processed foods today come in a variety of forms.

These include:

Canned and frozen fruits and vegetables

Canned meats (luncheon meat and sausage, corned beef, and meatloaf)

Breakfast foods, including cereals, oatmeal, energy bars

Canned, bottled, or tetra-packed fruit juices, energy drinks, and soda

Jarred baby foods and infant cereals

Foods fortified with nutrients

Ready to eat meals, microwave dinners

Ramen noodles

Pastries, including cookies, breads, frozen pizza, and pies

Condiments, seasonings and marinades, salad dressing, and jams

Yogurt and other commercially made fermented foods

The simplest way to determine if a food is processed is by looking at the ingredient list at the back of its packaging. The
longer the ingredient list, the more processed a food is likely to be.

After more than 20 years of struggle by consumer activists and public interest groups such as the Organic Consumers
Association, major food manufacturers are finally being forced to label GMO ingredients in processed foods sold in grocery
stores.
Because of this, many of them are starting to remove GMOs from their products, along with other artificial chemicals and
additives.

The History of Processing

Humans have been processing food through traditional methods for thousands of years. Egyptians have used salt for
4,000 years to extend the shelf life of food. In ancient sites in Italy, Russia and the Czech Republic, there was evidence that
early humans pounded cattails and ferns into flour and mixed it with water to bake bread.

Other methods of food preservation, including fermentation, pickling and curing, have also been used for thousands of
years, in different cultures. The food was used to help survive long winters and voyages, and also as rations when soldiers
went to war. This led to the production of foods like beer, wine, cheeses, yogurt and butter.

The 19th century saw the rise of modern food processing methods. Canning and bottling began mainly to serve military
needs, although the initial cans used were hazardous, as they were contaminated with lead.

Pasteurization, a method that prolongs the shelf life of dairy and wine to allow increased production and distribution, was
discovered and patented by Louis Pasteur in the mid-1800s.
In the 20th century, the rising consumer society contributed to the growth of food processing. Advances such as freeze
drying, spray drying and juice concentrates were developed. At the same time, coloring agents, preservatives and artificial
sweeteners were introduced.

Self-cooking meals, TV dinners, reconstituted fruits and juices and other instant foods like coffee and noodles became
popular. These were mostly marketed to working wives and mothers who were tired of preparing foods from scratch.

To convince people that processed foods were as good, or even better, than wholesome foods, they were marketed as a
means for people to save time and money - hence the term convenience foods.

But do the time and money you save by choosing these processed goods make up for the havoc that they wreak with your
health?

Not What the Human Body Needs, or Wants

The human body is not designed to thrive on processed foods. And foods are not meant to be altered. The more altered
they are, the worse they are for your health.

Processed foods are actually lacking in nutritional content compared to natural foods. For example, processed bread and
other snacks use refined grains that have the bran and germ removed and, along with it, important nutrients like fiber, iron
and B-vitamins.

Dehydrated foods not only have reduced amounts of vitamin C and fiber, but they also become more energy dense, which
causes them to contribute to weight gain. When dehydrated foods are constituted and cooked with water, even more
nutrients leach out.

Processed foods are also loaded with sugar, unhealthy fats and sodium, all of which your body is not designed to handle in
high amounts, and all of which can endanger health. Particularly damaging are refined sugars, like high-fructose corn syrup
(HFCS), which convert into fat in your body.
This wreaks havoc on your insulin and leptin levels, and leads to chronic diseases like obesity, diabetes and cancer.
Meanwhile, synthetic trans fats, in the form of partially hydrogenated vegetable oils, have been linked to heart disease.

And of course processed foods are routinely laced with hazardous genetically engineered and pesticide-drenched
ingredients derived from GMO corn, soybeans, canola, sugar beets and cotton (cottonseed oil is common in low-grade
vegetable oils).

According to the Grocery Manufacturers of America, 80 percent of all (non-organic) supermarket processed foods contain
GMOs. Only now are those ingredients being labeled, as food manufacturers are being forced to comply with Vermonts
GMO labeling law.

Loaded with Health-Harming Synthetic Additives

Close to 5,000 additives are now allowed to be used in food products. And this number keeps growing. If you factor in the
additives found in the packaging (which can also leach into your food), that number of additives can rise to 10,000!

Whats worse, most of these food additives have not undergone any safety testing, and very few have been tested
according to the way that they are ingested - meaning in combination with other additives. Some of these additives are
downright dangerous.

For example:

Diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione (PD), both of which are added to microwave popcorn to give it a buttery aroma, are
linked to brain health, Alzheimers disease and respiratory toxicity.

Monosodium glutamate (MSG), which is found in chips, processed meats and a wide array of other foods, is an
excitotoxin that can lead to cell damage, triggering brain dysfunction and leading to learning disabilities, Lou
Gehrig's disease, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and more.

Artificial food dyes like Red #40, Yellow 5, and Blue #2 are linked to brain tumors, hyperactivity, hypersensitivity
and other behavioral effects in children.

Preservatives like butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydroxyl toluene (BHT) can mess with your
brains neurological system, causing behavioral problems and even cancer. Another preservative, tertiary
butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), is also deadly. In fact, just five grams can kill you, according to the FDA.
Giving Up Processed Foods - Easier Said than Done

If you think you can simply shake off your processed food cravings, youre wrong. These foods are intentionally addictive.

They stimulate dopamine, a feel-good neurotransmitter that affects your brain similarly to how drugs affect you.
Manufacturers are fully aware of this, and actually engineer their products to produce this delicious yet dangerous effect.
(Michael Moss details this in his book, Salt, Sugar, Fat: How the Food Giants Hooked Us.)

Sadly, many people still consume GMO and pesticide-tainted, highly processed foods because of their affordability,
convenience and delicious flavor. But what you save in terms of money and convenience will ultimately put a double
whammy on your health.

Instead, go for a diet composed mostly of wholesome foods, like organic fruits and vegetables, grass-fed and pasture-raised
meat and raw (unpasteurized and unhomogenized) dairy, and healthy saturated fats like coconuts, coconut oil, avocados
and raw nuts.

For your beverage, choose pure water and fresh green juice instead of processed fruit juices, soda and energy drinks.

In addition, make sure to cook these wholesome foods in your home, so you can be sure that nothing harmful goes into your
meals. Cooking at home will also help you avoid dining at fast foods and restaurants (which also use processed
ingredients).

Encouraging your whole family to sit down and have a hearty meal together not only cultivates good health, it cultivates
good relationships.

Massive Vaccine Protests Erupt In China Over Widespread Deaths Of Children:

Government Responds By Arresting Protesters
May 11 2016 | From: NaturalNews
Recently, a massive vaccine scandal in China exposed the weakness of government efforts to
build up China's immunization program. It uncovered the system's flaws regarding the way in
which vaccines are distributed, and revealed close links between vendors and government clinics.

Although the vaccines were made by licensed manufacturers, they were transported and stored without any
refrigeration, and then sold by unlicensed distributors. Improper storing conditions may have ruined the vaccines,
leaving children unprotected and at risk of disabilities and death.

Related: Former NBC Boss Bob Wright asserts his grandson damaged by vaccines

According to Li Guoqing, who is in charge of drug supervision, investigators revealed how government clinics have been
selling expired or near-expired vaccines to vendors on the cheap, who in turn have been selling them to other government
clinics in remote areas where there is no oversight.

Authorities were well aware of these practices, and let an illegal vaccine shop continue its operations, thereby poisoning
thousands of its citizens, especially young children.

Chinese parents have lost all confidence in the government and government clinics, and are demanding answers.

Massive Protest

People across the country have gathered and joined forces in a nationwide protest over the vaccine scam. Dozens of
Chinese parents have filed a lawsuit demanding justice for the children who have been harmed by these tainted, improperly
stored vaccines, amid reports of child and infant deaths and illnesses following such immunizations.

Related: Robert De Niro denounces medical totalitarians: 'Let the people see VAXXED' and decide for themselves
what the evidence shows
 "Everybody gathered outside the National Health and Family Planning Commission today, and then we all
marched to their complaints department in the Xizhimen district," parent activist Liu Lixin told Radio Free
Asia (RFA).

"We are calling for a vaccines law, because there is no legislation covering vaccinations right now, and families
who have been victims of this disaster have no judicial redress," he said.

"Our children have suffered varying degrees of harm and disability as a result of immunization injections," the
lawsuit reads. "Some have even lost the ability to live independently."

China Jailing Vaccine Protesters

The impact of the scandal couldn't be brushed under the carpet, so the Chinese government announced that 357 officials
have been dismissed or demoted for "poor performance," and has promised to take further actions to ensure better storage
and distribution methods.
However, the reality seems a bit different. As many as 2,000 people gathered outside the Health and Family Planning
Commission in Beijing, among them many parents whose children have been affected.

The authorities took large numbers of people participating in the protests or lawsuits to an out-of-town unofficial detention
center, and some were put under 24-hour surveillance at their homes.

"I had planned to take part [in the Beijing protests and lawsuits], but I was forcibly escorted home by officials from
my hometown on April 13," parent activist Wang Liangqing said.

"Now they are watching us 24 hours a day, so we weren't able to go." Wang called on the government to take the
victims of tainted vaccines seriously.

United States Heading in the Same Direction

Related: Lead designer of Gardasil trials now warns parents against the vaccine

This incident is a perfect example of how governments collude with Big Pharma, and the U.S. isn't doing any better.

Soon, we will have no say when it comes to our own health. The CDC has set up a "police state" registry system to identify
and track areas of so-called "under vaccination," and while this may seem like innocent data gathering, in the future people
will be pushed to follow national vaccination guidelines against their own will.
Pro-vaccine activist and fanatics, such as Dr. David Gorski, are doing everything in their power to promote vaccines and
conventional drugs and discredit all that is natural and holistic.

And, just as in China, key people in the U.S. government are involved. Last year, California's vaccine mandate bill SB277
was halted by the public. Unfortunately, the vaccine mafia's henchmen came out to play, and helped replace seats on the
committee with pro-vaccine activists to vote in favor of stripping Californians of their vaccine exemption rights.

Related: Robert DeNiro on VAXXED, 'There's something there people aren't addressing'

The Positive Choice Wellness Center Calls Out Sun Avoidance As Misguided
May 11 2016 | From: Mercola

Over the past 40+ years, dermatologists have promoted the idea that you should never be exposed
to direct sunlight because it will damage your skin and cause skin cancer.
You might wonder, well what about vitamin D? No problem, as according to the American Academy of
Dermatology, vitamin D deficiency can easily be addressed with vitamin D supplements.

What they fail to acknowledge and appreciate is that when youre exposed to sunlight, many important biological processes
occur in your skin, not just vitamin D production.

This is separate from swallowing oral vitamin D, which is an important but, according to many experts, clearly inferior
alternative. While it will improve your vitamin D status, you forgo the many benefits sunlight offers aside from vitamin D
production.

Weighing the Risks and Benefits of Sun Exposure

Unfortunately, the entire focus of most dermatologists is preventing skin damage, which means ignoring the other side - the
benefits - of the sun exposure equation.

This includes heightened protection against a number of internal cancers and other chronic diseases, including heart
disease, which kills far more people than melanoma does.

Ironically, recent research shows that vitamin D also improves survival outcomes for melanoma patients. Its also important
for cognitive health, immune function, healthy pregnancy and infant development, and strong, healthy bones, just to name a
few.

As noted in a recent news report:

"Fifteen to 20 minutes in sunlight a day helps your body produce the vitamin D it needs to absorb calcium and
promote bone growth and keep the heart healthy. But sunscreen - important to protect against skin cancer -
reduces the body's ability to manufacture the vitamin.
 Doctors can be torn on recommending time in the sun when too much and too little both have consequences.

British Association of Dermatologists: Sunscreen is Causing Skin Cancer

Ths would explain NZ's record high rates. If you are still eating corporate / corpse chemicals, or putting them anywhere near
your body, you need your head read. Its a corporate death cult - the goal being population reduction.

Sun Avoidance Decreases Melanoma Risk But Increases All-Cause Mortality

A recent study driving home these benefits was completed in Sweden. More than 25,500 Swedish women between the ages
of 25 and 64 were followed for 20 years. Detailed information about sun exposure habits and confounding factors were
obtained and analyzed in a competing risk scenario.

Overall, women who got regular sun exposure had a lower all-cause mortality risklikely due to their increased vitamin D
levels.

Women with active sun exposure habits ended up having a lower risk of cardiovascular disease and non-cancer death
compared to those who avoided the sun. Of particular note:

Nonsmokers who avoided sun exposure had a life expectancy similar to smokers in the highest sun exposure
group, indicating that avoidance of sun exposure is a risk factor for death of a similar magnitude as
smoking.

Compared to the highest sun exposure group, life expectancy of avoiders of sun exposure was reduced by 0.62.1
years.
Other Research That Puts Melanoma Risk Into Perspective

Previous research has shown that when sunlight strikes your skin, nitric oxide is released into your bloodstream and nitric
oxide is a powerful blood pressure lowering compound.

This has led researchers to conclude that sun exposure may prolong your life by significantly cutting your heart attack/stroke
risk. One 2013 study mentions an absolutely stunning statistic.

For every one skin cancer death in northern Europe, between 60 and 100 people die from stroke or heart disease, related to
hypertension. Knowing your risk of dying from heart disease or stroke is 80 times greater on average than from skin cancer
really puts it in perspective.

While higher vitamin D levels correlate with lower rates of cardiovascular disease, oral vitamin D supplements do not appear
to benefit blood pressure, and the fact that supplements do not increase nitric oxide may be the reason for this.

According to researcher Richard Weller:

 Nonsmokers who avoided sun exposure had a life expectancy similar to smokers in the highest sun exposure
group, indicating that avoidance of sun exposure is a risk factor for death of a similar magnitude as
smoking.

Compared to the highest sun exposure group, life expectancy of avoiders of sun exposure was reduced by 0.62.1
years.

Read more at: Mercola [including references]

Homeopathy Officially Recognized By Swiss Government As Legitimate Medicine To

Coexist With "Conventional" Medicine
May 6 2016 | From: NaturalNews

Broadening their definition of medicine, the Swiss government is announcing a positive shift
toward alternative healing and complementary therapies.

For far too long, health insurance has guaranteed a monopoly for a system dominated by synthetic drugs.
The Swiss government is breaking out of that confining mold and allowing patients' health insurance plans to cover five new
complementary therapies.

In May 2017, health insurance plans in Switzerland will be covering a variety of healing modalities, including homeopathy,
acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine, herbal medicine and holistic medicine. In this way, Switzerland will be
bringing back the many healing arts that were used successfully in the past.

A shift away from the disease management, synthetic drug system

This shift toward integration will allow the Swiss healthcare system to heal, as it moves away from profiting off disease
management. With the inclusion of these five eclectic healing modalities, Swiss healthcare will become more affordable. By
legitimizing these true healing modalities, healthcare can compete to heal, empowering people instead of leaving them in an
expensive cycle of side effects and negative outcomes.

Synthetic pharmaceutical "science" got its start in 1869, as experiments with coal tar were underway. The first drug was a
sedative-hypnotic called chloral hydrate. Pharmaceutical companies got their start after experimenting with nasty coal-tar
distillations.

Many of the first drugs were modeled after textiles and dyes. The first analgesic and antipyretic drugs, phenacetin and
acetanilide, were made from aniline and p-nitrophenol, which are just byproducts of coal tar.

Pharmaceutical "science," for the most part, is an absolute abandonment of the healing modalities that have sustained
humans for centuries. The good news is that many herbalists are still around today, passing on the trade of making real
medicine using plants. Plants synthesize their own medicine and contain compounds that, when extracted and used
correctly, work in conjunction with the human body systems, restoring its healing state.

Swiss people speak out, pressure government to include complementary therapies on list of paid
health services

After Swiss health authorities blocked the alternative medicine fields from legitimacy in 2005, the people of Switzerland
spoke out. In 2009, two-thirds of the Swiss voted to include these five important healing modalities on the country's
constitutional list of paid health services.

When 2012 rolled around, all five complementary healing modalities were included in basic compulsory insurance coverage
as part of a six-year trial period. At the end of the trial period, determinations would be made based on the alternative
therapies "efficacy, costeffectiveness and suitability."

Holistic approaches are gauged through observation, in the progress of healing over time

Now the interior ministry has determined what many holistic practitioners already understand about the healing arts.
It's "impossible to provide such proof for these disciplines in their entirety." The proof of their efficacy is in the individual's
own experience, initiative and commitment.

Holistic therapies are not like synthetic drugs. The whole person is treated, not just a symptom. It's impossible to gauge an
"alternative" therapy on paper, in a perfectly controlled environment.

Comment: The whole concept of "Alternative Therapies" and " Alternative Medicine" is madness from the outset.

Natural remedies that have been used successfully for thousands of years were marked as whackery - simply
because the establishment could not patent them, profit from them; and nor would actual cures have worked in
favour of their depopulation agenda. It's not rocket science once you are aware of the agendas.

The Pharmaceutical nightmare that has been launched upon humanity is the alternative medicine / therapy that is
the actual threat for the most part.

And what an utterly horrific, profit-driven monstrosity at that.

The proof is typically in the observation, in the progress of healing over time.

And so, in this understanding, these five healing modalities will continue to be reimbursed by compulsory health insurance
plans, as long as they are administered by certified medical professionals. This is an enormous step in the right direction for
a healthcare system that is seeking to integrate more than just synthetic manipulations and suppression of the human body.
This shift toward integration of medicine will also allow questionable treatments within these complementary healing
systems to face more scrutiny, so that the best holistic approaches can come out and be a success for people.

Iodine: The Miracle Mineral For Brain, Body And Spirit

May 5 2016 | From: Sott

When most people think about iodine, they tend to think it's only good for the thyroid.
But it's not just the thyroid that is hungry for this mineral! Iodine is also concentrated in the salivary glands, the
lining of the stomach and the small intestine, the breasts and ovaries, the eyes, and the part of the brain where
cerebro-spinal fluid is produced.

Related: Iodine and Antibiotics

Deficiency of iodine in any tissue can cause problems with that area of the body and weakens the immune system. Some
symptoms of iodine deficiency are brain fog, nodules in the skin like are common with arthritis, fibrosis and fibroids,
fibromyalgia, and chronic fatigue.

Dr. David Brownstein's book Iodine: Why You Need It, Why You Can't Live Without Itis perhaps one of the best's books on
iodine. In his book, he explains how iodine can kill fungi, bacteria, viruses and how it removes fluoride and enables
the body to detox heavy metals even the toxic metals (e.g., mercury, cadmium) that other detox methods can't remove.

Iodine basically feeds your glands; it feeds all your cells. More researchers are rediscovering that this mineral has
miraculous effects on the entire body.

The Nobel laureate Dr. Albert Szent Gyrgi (1893 - 1986), the physician who discovered vitamin C, wrote:

When I was a medical student, iodine in the form of KI was the universal medicine. Nobody knew what it did, but it
did something and did something good. We students used to sum up the situation in this little rhyme: If ye don't
know where, what, and why Prescribe ye then K and I (iodine)."

Lynne Farrow author of The Iodine Crisis has written extensively about how iodine helps breast cancer and prevents mental
retardation. It is well documented that iodine deficiency is the leading cause of mental retardation in the world.

Comment: Have a listen to this episode of the Health and Wellness Show to hear what Lynne Farrow has to say about
iodine.

There's more!

Lack of iodine negatively impacts your cognitive abilities because your brain needs sufficient iodine.

Beyond helping the brain function, sufficient iodine strengthens your will. People will be amazed at how strong their will
becomes! This effect could be due to the fact that iodine removes fluoride out of the pineal gland - an endocrine gland
located in the brain that is said to be the "seat of the soul."

The pineal gland is also referred to as the third eye, and acts as a gateway to Spirit and higher levels of consciousness,
beyond our brain-created matrix.

Did you know that well over 90% of people are iodine deficient?

I find that really interesting. If iodine can be a miracle cure, why are we not being educated about its powerful effect on the
body? Is it because it can't be patented and is not a money maker for the pharmaceutical industry?
How to get the iodine you need?

With the exception of seafood, including sea plants like seaweed, iodine is not found in great abundance in many foods.
And, table salt is not going to help you get the iodine you need. Research shows that just ten percent of iodine in salt is
completely absorbed by your body.

And, it provides miniscule amounts of iodine, far below the recommended dosage. Since we're on the topic of salt, you'll
want to avoid white table salt when you do use salt. Instead, invest a little more money and get good Celtic sea
salt or Himalayan salt.

The best form of supplemental iodine is "nascent iodine" or what is also referred to as atomic iodine. It has superior
absorption because of its molecular structure. Click here to find out the top 5 benefits of this form of iodine and watch an
excellent video on iodine.

Comment: Nascent iodine may not be the best form. According to Dr. Jeffrey Dach:

Nascent (aka Magnascent, Detoxified, or Atomidine) - Based on Edgar Cayce's "energized" iodine. The iodine is
reduced to a 1% concentration in 100% ethyl alcohol and electro-magnetically transmuted (while being suspended
in a wet bath containing a mild acid solution) into the Atomic state.

1 drop = 150 microgram (mcg) or .150 mg of Iodine. This form will not saturate body tissues and has not
been proven to detox halides such as bromide, fluoride, chloride, and mercury, as other forms have. This form of
iodine is not recommended on this protocol as the goal is tissue saturation and halide detoxification/protection."

What do the experts say about dosage?

The RDA for iodine is around 150 mcg but according to Dr. David Brownstein, we should be getting far more than the
government recommended dose. Dr. Brownstein and other researchers recommend doses ranging from 6-50 mg/day for
most people.

Some researchers recommend high doses, like 50 to 100mg a day, to replenish the body's iodine and remove any microbes
that have built up over the years because of the body's weakened immune system due to all toxins in our environment.

Given that iodine has no side effects like pharmaceuticals, and there is no development of resistance against it, it's hard to
argue against taking high dosages.

How long does it take to reap the benefits?

While it can take many months to clear out toxins or to help something like ovarian cysts, the beneficial effects on the
brain and energy levels are much faster. People who take iodine in sufficient amounts report that they have a greater
sense of well-being, increased energy, and a lifting of brain fog and sharper mental abilities.

To find out more about iodine, I recommend Dr. Edward F. Group's video "Everything You Need To Know About Iodine." He
has studied natural healing methods for over 20 years and is well respected by authors and researchers. This video
(towards the bottom of the page) is one of the most comprehensive videos that educates people about the powers of iodine.

We all need to strengthen our bodies because when our health is strong, we can much more easily cope with challenges in
life. We need all our energy to navigate the massive changes that are coming.

See also: Iodine - Suppressed knowledge that can change your life

Boycott Tourism In NZ: More Fluorides?

May 4 2016 | From: JonRappoport

Recently, Ive written several articles about toxic fluorides (archive: here). The case is clear:
cancer, lower IQ, other varieties of severe damage.

I became aware of a group in New Zealand, Fluoride Free NZ. Theyve had remarkable success working with local
communities to ban fluorides in water supplies.

Related: Stop Giving Fluoride Toothpaste to Children

But now, in response, the New Zealand government has decided to make fluoridation a federal issue and take choice out of
the hands of locals. Predictable. Tyrannical. The usual.

Well fluoridate everybody, and theres nothing you can do about it. We rule, you obey.
So I suggested people should write to the tourism authority in New Zealand. You know - Hi, guess what? My money isnt
coming to your country. More fluorides? Im not traveling to your paradise.

This is the best contact address Ive been able to come up with so far:

Associate Minister of Tourism

Paula Bennett

paula.bennett@ministers.govt.nz

Jump in. Go for it. Send a message. A reader emailed me the letter he just wrote:

Dear Tourism New Zealand executive staff,

My name is Michael Blanshan. I am a naturopathic doctor in New Mexico, U.S.A. Years ago a group of friends and
I were discussing New Zealand and all it has to offer as a country. Many of our group travelled to New Zealand and
two families moved there, one to Nelso and one to Christchurch. These were good families with children and much
to offer their local communities, not retirees looking for a country in which to retire.

In my own travels I often run into New Zealanders (aka kiwis). They are generally great travelers, good people,
kind, open-minded, intelligent, and generally fun. The very spirit of New Zealand which most kiwis embody seems
to me to serve as New Zealands best advertising.

Being a naturopath, I am keenly aware of the history of the fluoridation of drinking water, those who promoted this
policy, their motivations for doing so, and the forms of pressure they use to continue the policy despite compelling
scientific opposition. A local organization in New Zealand calling itself Fluoride Free NZ has worked tirelessly with
communities to educate them on this issue.

They worked diligently and the majority of those communities have chosen not to fluoridate their local water
supplies. In response to this groups effectiveness, the NZ federal government is now acting to take the decision
making authority away from local councils and communities and put the power into the hands of District Health
Boards (DHB), who are under the direct control of Central Government.

This action has profound implications, though it may seem inconsequential to you, especially considering that you
are a department for tourism. Though I stated that the people of New Zealand are its best feature, this is a black
mark on New Zealand as a country. It points to a corruption of your federal government and its purported goals of
serving its people. To the contrary, the government is showing that it has a will of its own and that it acts in the
interests of other parties.

The policy of fluoridation originated in the U.S.A. in the 1940s. Many European countries have rejected this policy,
knowing it was not about health but rather that it was the result of corrupt influences. For the New Zealand
government to force this policy shows that theyre not interested in science or the natural rights of the people and
worse, that the New Zealand government is caving to pressure from either American or UK interests.

Please understand that the irony of an American writing about corruption in government does not escape me.
Educated Americans know all too well the workings and techniques of a dictatorship which presents itself as a
democracy. It is as a result of the extreme corruption of the leadership of Western countries that we look to New
Zealand and still see it to be a land of free individuals who can run their local communities as they like.

If the New Zealand federal government goes ahead with this decision, I personally will not visit New Zealand in the
future. If any of my friends or clients discuss the possibility of travelling to New Zealand, I will do my best to
dissuade them.

Potential visitors to New Zealand should know that all is not well in paradise and that behind the scenes you have
 the same dictatorship we see in the [rest of the] West. Despite all its physical beauty I still contend that the best
part about New Zealand is its people.

If the people of New Zealand are forced to stand in the shadow cast by a dictatorial federal government, something
vital and essential will have been lost.

Sincerely,

Michael Blanshan

Thank you,

Michael.

Thank you, Fluoride Free NZ, for showing the way.

I keep hearing this thing called the Internet is a wonderful apparatus with many uses. Well, heres one.

Boom.

Jon Rappoport

Comment: What does it take to wake these intentionally distracted master chef cooking-show home renovation
watching reality -television watching idiots up already? Time is up!

Related: U.K. Town Moves Forward with Fluoridated Milk for Children

The Real Science On Vaccines, Dental Fillings, And Brain Damage: Stunning Video
Shows How Mercury Content Damages Neurons Under A Microscope
May 3 2016 | From: NaturalNews
T\Medical science has long known that mercury is a health hazard no matter how it gets into the
body. Whether by foods we eat, water we drink, through vaccines or even our dental fillings,
mercury is damaging to our health and toxic to our bodies.

According to this scientific video explaining mercury's toxic effects, one of the major contributors to mercury
toxicity in via dental fillings.

The video, produced by the University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, "clearly shows
how mercury in fillings can destroy brain neurons as seen with people who have Alzheimer's Disease," according to a
description of it posted online at YouTube.

Researchers demonstrated in 1997 how mercury vapor inhalation by animals produced negative effects in the brain in
particular a lesion that is seen in at least 80 percent of brains in patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. And more
recently, researchers at the University of Calgary were able to demonstrate how mercury can alter the cell structure of
developing neurons in the brain.

Immune System Compromised

Later research published in PLOS ONE by researchers from the College of William and Mary in Virginia found that
songbirds that were exposed to sub-lethal and trace amounts of mercury left over from industrial manufacturing operations
incurred reproductive problems and immune suppression, as well as brain abnormalities and other anomalies.

The songbirds' exposure to industrial chemicals in the environment has also been studied in fish and fish-eating birds, but at
that time it had not been studied so much in forest birds.

Dan Cristol, a biology professor at the College of William and Mary, and some colleagues embarked on a study to find out
how other types of birds specifically songbirds living around the Shenandoah Valley's South River were being affected
by chemical residues still evident from manufacturing of rayon that occurred at DuPont factories between 1929 and 1950.
Rayon is a type of smooth textile that is often used in place of silk, but the manufacturing process left behind mercury and
other chemicals in nearby rivers and land. For many decades, birds living in the area had been exposed to those chemicals
as they searched for food. That was a scenario that Cristol saw as an opportunity to learn more about the effects of that
exposure.

As reported by The Virginia Gazette:

The Establishment has promoted these dysfunctional communication rules and used them to manipulate and con
numerous young Americans to needlessly enlist or allow themselves to be drafted to fight in illegal,
unConstitutional, unprovoked, undeclared, unwinnable, perpetual foreign wars on behalf of the Worlds largest
Organized crime syndicate, the Khazarian Mafia (KM).

"They had 20 percent fewer babies," he said. "Their songs are sung at the wrong pitch. Their hormone levels are altered.
Their immune systems are suppressed."

Early Onset Dementia And Mercury Link?

The research team could not draw a line directly from mercury to the anomalies, but they said it looked very much like
mercury was the cause.

In 2015, we reported that mercury, which can be found in vaccines as the preservative "thimerosal," was likely to blame for
early-onset dementia occurring in people in their 40s:

Dementia and other neurological brain diseases are striking people younger and younger, according to a new
study conducted by researchers from Bournemouth University in England and published in the journal Surgical
Neurology International.

These diseases have reached levels that are "almost epidemic," the researchers said, and they reached them so
quickly that environmental factors must be largely to blame.

You can watch the short but fascinating video explaining mercury toxicity on the brain from the University of Calgary below
or at this link.
New Zealand Government Plans To Drown Its Citizens In Toxic Fluorides
April 30 2016 | From: JonRappoport / Infowars

Why should a government be permitted to dump poison into the water and call it medical
treatment?

Oh, I love New Zealand. Its one of the most beautiful places on Earth. Itswhat? What did you say?No, thats
impossible. That couldnt be happening. Theyre doing what??

Related: Fluoride Now Linked to Neurotoxicity Pandemic and Development of the A-Bomb

The strategy of the New Zealand government is simple.

A series of local movements is successful. So kill them off by claiming decision-making must occur at a higher level. Take
power out of the hands of locals.

The people cant represent themselves. Thats dangerous. No, big government will represent the people - by squashing
what the people want.

The issue is fluorides. I recently wrote two articles demonstrating the extreme toxicity of this substance, which of course is
dumped in water supplies as a medical treatment. (fluoride archive here).

In New Zealand, a group called Fluoride Free NZ has been highly successful working with town councils to ban fluorides
from local communities.
Related: No fluoride for Whakatane District water supplies

But these successes are a threat, because they contradict the lies medical authorities spew about how safe fluorides are,
and because grass-roots victories erode blind faith in centralized government.

Here are quotes from Kane Titchener, who represents the group, Fluoride Free NZ, in New Zealand. His remarks lay out
whats happening behind the scenes in that natural paradise:

the fluoridation issue has been brought to a head. The NZ Government is proposing that the [bigger] District
Health Boards take over the decision making [about] fluoridation [in water supplies] as opposed to the local
councils. This is because we have been very good at winning at the local council level.

Fluoride Free NZ was formed in 2003. Since that time we have had many substantial victories in local Councils
throughout New Zealand. Local Councils that have stopped [fluoridating water supplies] as a result of Fluoride
Free NZs lobbying efforts: New Plymouth; Taumarunui; Waipukurau; Far North

Related: Fluoride Officially Classified as a Neurotoxin in Worlds Most Prestigious Medical Journal

In summary, the Government is planning to implement mandatory fluoridation to the whole of New Zealand.
Currently, only around 50% of households are on fluoridated water, with only 23 out of 67 local councils still
fluoridating, while voicing their growing concerns about fluoridation risks and dangers.

In response to more and more councillors and mayors deciding against fluoridation, the Government is now taking
the decision away from local councils and communities and putting the power into the hands of District Health
Boards (DHB), who are under the direct control of Central Government.

If you think Fluoride Free NZs successes working with town councils is a walk in the park, think again. This group has
scored victories against long odds. This group is smart, dedicated, and effective.

They represent what can happen when strong, clear-sighted, creative individuals band together to accomplish a righteous
goal.

And the tyrannical response of big government is predictable.

However, there is going to be blowback against that government in New Zealand.

The degree and power of the blowback is going to depend, in part, on the response of people around the world who become
aware of the situation and make their voices heard.

Contact Fluoride Free NZ. Help them. Spread their press releases all over the world.
Why should a government be permitted to dump poison into the water and call it medical treatment?

And having called it medical treatment, by what power can a government mandate it for all citizens without informed
consent, without the explicit permission of those millions of patients? Yes, patients, because thats what they are. Theyre
being treated every day.

By what power can this happen? Dictatorship calling itself democracy.

A note to tourists: how do you feel about traveling to New Zealand and bathing in, and drinking, poison? Do you like that
bonus for spending your good money in paradise?

If not, you might want to contact the New Zealand tourism authority (newzealand.com) and let them know about your
change of plans.
Such organizations are always interested in money, where its coming fromand where it wont be coming from.

Related: US government actually admits: Americans have been overdosed with fluoride

Scientist Who Found Gluten Sensitivity Now Says it Doesnt Exist + Industrial GMO
Food Threats & The Global Monsanto Take Down
April 28 2016 | From: WakingTimes / Geopolitics / Various

Is Monsantos glyphosate the true cause of sensitivity to glutenous foods?

Millions of people are said to have some intolerance to gluten, the sticky protein that can be found in breads,
barley, and other wheat products. But how scientifically grounded is this sudden wave of large-scale gluten
intolerance? As it turns out, it may not be gluten that is triggering health problems, but a reaction to agrochemicals
being used in the harvesting of wheat.
Related: Scientific Consensus Statement Reveals Roundup Herbicide A Major Health Threat

Gluten is a protein composite that acts as a glue for bread, holding it together and giving it that fluffy, chewy texture that
people enjoy. It is also used as a chewy meat substitute called seitan, widely used by vegetarians and vegans. Although
some experts believe that only 1 percent of Americans have Celiac Disease, the auto-immune disorder that results in gluten
intolerance, 18 percent of adults now reportedly regularly purchase gluten-free foods and about 30 percent say they want to
eat less gluten.

In 2011, an Australian scientist named Peter Gibson at Monash University conducted an experiment to determine whether
gluten in the diet can cause gastrointestinal distress in people who did not have celiac disease. When experiments
confirmed this hypothesis, they named this condition non-celiac gluten sensitivity or NCGS, thus beginning the gluten-free
trend, which has resulted in an estimated $15 billion industry by 2016.

Gibson was not satisfied with his findings, however, and because of how common gluten is in the diets of so many people,
both modern and historically, he wanted to know why and how gluten could be causing this reaction in people who were not
suffering from celiac disease. Consequently, he decided to take his research to a new level and conduct an experiment
more rigorous than anything typically found in nutritional studies.

For this new experiment, Gibson sought out 37 self-identified gluten sensitive patients. The study was done double-blind
with subjects that had NCGS and irritable bowel syndrome, but not celiac disease. For two weeks, the patients were given
high-gluten, low-gluten, and no-gluten meals (as the control group), followed by a two-week washout period.

The findings of the study showed that although in opposition to the results found in the first experiment, gluten
intolerance actually does not exist in people without celiac disease. A third study, also by Gibson, further supports
these findings, suggesting perhaps that much of what we see as gluten sensitivity is psychosomatic.

In contrast to our first study we could find absolutely no specific response to gluten,

Dr. Peter Gibson

It May Not Be The Gluten But Dont Eat That Wheat Too Soon
Related: Bread and Other Edible Agents of Mental Disease

Although gluten is no longer believed to be the culprit of health problems reportedly associated with consuming glutenous
wheat, that does not mean that conventionally grown wheat is completely safe to eat. In fact, until 2005, GMO wheat was
being tested in 16 states, and is known to have escaped testings grounds, genetically polluting nearby fields via
airborne seeds and cross-pollination.

Further testing by USDA laboratories indicates the presence of the same GE glyphosate-resistant wheat variety
that Monsanto was authorized to field test in 16 states from 1998 to 2005.

USDA, reported by Natural News

In addition, even non-GMO wheat is drenched with Monsantos carcinogenic glyphosate Round-up just days before harvest,
because, as it turns out, wheat fields produce slightly more seed when sprayed with this poison 7-10 days before harvest, as
researched by Dr. Stephanie Seneff of MIT.

It goes to seed as it dies. At its last gasp, it releases the seed.

Dr. Seneff

Not only has glyphosate been found to be a probable carcinogen by the World Health Organization, but has been linked to a
variety of other health issues including depression, diabetes and you guessed it, celiac disease and gluten intolerance.

This study from 2013 shows that fish exposed to glyphosate develop digestive issues similar to celiac disease.
 If Glyphosate ends up in bread its impossible for people to avoid it, unless they are eating organic. On the other
hand, farmers could easily choose not to use Glyphosate as a spray on wheat crops just before they are
harvested. This is why the Soil Association is calling for the immediate ending of the use of Glyphosate sprays on
wheat destined for use in bread.

Peter Melchett of the Soil Association

Conclusion

It is true that not every food fad ends up being true. However, we should still take caution when choosing the foods we feed
our families. Although it has been found that gluten itself is not causing an intolerance in people without celiac disease, there
are still other issues with wheat production that we need to be aware of.

Get your wheat from local, organic farms when possible and do what you can to avoid Monsanto and other pesticide
companys chemical toxins finding their way into your body.

Industrial GMO Food Threats & The Global Monsanto Take Down
The debate over GMO safety and risks stems from the fact that the definition is too generalized, or too ambiguous.
The mainstream conversation about its pseudo-science always favors the corporations behind it.

Related: France to ban glyphosate-tallowamine weedkillers amid health concerns

But mere scientific definition is not enough to circumvent the actual disastrous experience, i.e. those glaring facts about its
negative effects outside the GMO laboratories.
The long term side effects of consuming genetically modified, processed, or preserved, foods are beginning to unravel. The
corporations have billions of reasons not to publicize its methods and why they are moving heaven and hell not to label
GMO products.

Whatever you do, dont ever gamble with the food you eat unless you can afford to pay for your expensive medications later
on.

Here are the real scientific reasons why GMO foods are extremely dangerous, and how scientists around the world are
being coerced to toe the biotech establishments line.

Up to now we are still very skeptical if the reported removal of GMO ingredients from Kraft products is real, or mere publicity
stunt.

"Orange you glad you didnt notice.

Kraft altered its beloved formula for the Day-Glo sheen of its popular Macaroni & Cheese earlier this year but
now the company is rolling out a big bucks ad campaign to tell people.

Its not as if it were a secret. Kraft announced nearly a year ago it was going to make this change. It started
shipping the new recipe in December and has already sold over 50 million boxes.

Its new commercial features Craig Kilborn standing in a supermarket.

Moms didnt notice. Kids didnt notice. Dogs didnt notice, Kilborn said. None of them noticed a thing because
this Kraft Mac & Cheese still tastes like Kraft Mac & Cheese. Its changed but it hasnt.

- NYDailyNews

The problem with this claim is that no independent consumer group is certifying that such is the case. Another known fact to
remind ourselves is the inherent chemical contamination right at the production lines itself.

If ordinary tampons, or gauze, can be contaminated with glyphosate during production [here], why not food products which
were subjected to artificial fertilizers and pesticides from growing to packaging?

"Nitrogen fertilizers are used to prevent nitrogen from becoming depleted from the soil. Unfortunately, the overuse
of nitrogen fertilizers isnt without its long-term consequences. According to a new study published in the journal
Environmental Research Letters, nitrogen fertilizers are causing nitrates to build up in the Mississippi
Basin, polluting ground and surface water.

Nitrates increase the risk of blue baby syndrome, according to the recent study. The illness replaces a childs
hemoglobin with methemoglobin, which minimizes the ability of blood to carry oxygen throughout the body. Infants
are most often affected by the malady, which is marked by a blueness around the mouth. Other symptoms include
difficulties breathing, vomiting and diarrhea. In extreme cases, blue baby syndrome can be fatal."

- NaturalNews

The Global GMO Monsanto Takedown

Related: Monsanto suffers week of devastating defeats as lawmakers back away from biotech influence and
intimidation

There are so many concerned groups that have taken the cudgels of bringing down abusive food corporations for decades
now. Yet, the fight to end these abuses has not achieved its intended outcome.

Then came a covert global effort to neutralize the single crime syndicate thats been doing all the evils in our society today.

The information we received after the events in 2001 said that there is a global movement to take down the tightly knit,
highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations, that
sought to depopulate and control the world for its own caprices.

This Reformist Collective, the most visible manifestation of which is the BRICS, is said to be employing both hard and soft
power to achieve its aims of creating a world of mutual progress by allowing the full and responsible use of suppressed
technologies to eliminate scarcity and institute abundance for all, and end all types of geopolitical conflicts.

There is now a growing body of evidence that the genocidal group of the Bushes, Rockefellers, Gates, etc. are being
systematically neutralized, i.e. their attempts to start a nuclear war with Iran has been suppressed.

The Rothschild banking dynasty, along with the UK Monarchy and Vatican, are said to have no other choice but cooperate
with this group after the Global Collateral Accounts, the massive tranche of historical gold lent by Asian royalties to back up
the entire financial system for the last 100 years or so, were frozen prompting the massive resignations of CEO bankers
around the globe in 2012.

This bankers resignations were punctuated by the resignation of the World Bank president and Vatican Pope Benedict XVI
in 2013.

Part of the global reform is to bring down Monsanto, the acknowledged rogue player in the realm of genetically modified
food production, of which mass vaccinations advocate Bill Gates is a major stockholder.

Those who have chosen the path to peaceful resolution and have since cooperated with the BRICS and will be paid for
handsomely.
Early in February of this year, ChemChina frustrated Monsantos attempt to buy off Swiss Syngenta through a $43 billion
offer. While western media is saying that China is just trying to feed its more than a billion mouths, we believe there is a
much profound objective for the acquisition, among many acquisitions.

ChemChina became a pesticide powerhouse in 2011 when its subsidiary, China National Agrochemical
Corporation, acquired Makhteshim Agan Industries (Israel), the worlds 7th largest pesticide manufacturer, and
became ADAMA, said the Canada-based ETC Group. With revenues over $3 billion in 2013, ADAMA sells
generic pesticide products in more than 120 countries ADAMAs largest market is Europe (37%), followed by
Latin America (25%). (Parentheses in original)

ChemChinas interests go way beyond agrochemicals. Last year it acquired Italys Pirelli, one of the worlds leading
tire manufacturers, for $7.9 billion. Its other major purchases include French firms Adisseo and Rhodia, Australias
Qenos, Norwegian silicon maker Elkem, German machinery maker Krauss Maffee, and 12% of Swiss energy
trader Mercuria.

The company is also looking to expand its presence in the domestic market. A merger with Syngenta would turn
ChemChina into the countrys top pesticide company. This is no small undertaking, given that China is the worlds
third largest pesticide market, after the US and Brazil. If foreign agrochemical companies were to be interested in
investing in Chinas vast market they would find themselves squeezed into a minor corner by a gigantic Syngenta-
ChemChina combination.

ChemChinas ambitions are part of a larger story. Chinese food and agriculture companies are moving abroad and
starting to compete toe to toe with their Western counterparts and even buying them out. In 2013, Chinas
Shuanghui corporation bought Smithfield, the leading US pork company, for $7.1 billion, the largest ever purchase
of a US company by Chinese investors.

Another Chinese company to watch is COFCO, the countrys leading food processor, which acquired a controlling
stake in the Netherlands agricultural commodity trader Nidera. The majority stake in Nidera would give COFCO
 greater control over pricing and better access to Latin America and Russia, important grain-growing regions, the
Wall Street Journal reported in 2014."

- CounterPunch

Once the deal is fully consummated, China could dictate where Western companies should proceed from hereon.

Will China continue the regressive direction of the food industry? Or, will it force the positive enhancements of food
production drawing the lessons learned at l Loess Plateau, Central China?

It is estimated that even if only 10% of the population of the earth will do permaculture, its enough to feed the entire
population.

Of course, we can always question Chinas real motives, but judging from how the decades of Western control of Africa
induces famine, hunger and endless ethnic conflicts, one needs to see only how Ethiopia achieved 11% economic growth
after they have allowed China to participate in their economy.

While its true that China has been investing billions in Africa in exchange for access to its rich natural resources, its also
true that the West has been plundering Africas resources for centuries just to satisfy its military industrial complex.

In deep contrast and in addition to Chinas acquisition of Syngenta, it is also planning to create the largest solar power farm
grid around the planet.

Related: Chinas $50 Trillion Global Clean Energy Project Muted by Panama Papers
How then can we participate in the global effort to defeat the regressive group responsible for our collective misery and
moral degradation?

We Need to Step Back

Humanity has reached the apex of its own capacity to inflict pain on itself.

Scientific advancements are all being used to manufacture great weapons of war; genetic engineering is being exploited to
create plant and animal species only to increase production and profits rather than make people healthy, drugs and
medicines are designed to make people sick, and the school system and mass media are making the people dumber.

The frequency and number of colorful protests against corporate abuses in the realm of education, food production and
healthcare, banking and finance, are breaking previous records yet the benefits gained from these mass actions are
disproportionately useless.

Corporations will just change the name of their products to circumvent the unfavorable regulations.

The belief that we still own the government we have right now is wasting a lot of time and effort in demanding that policies
must be changed and enforcement of these policies must be done. It is time to accept the fact that big corporations own the
government, and no matter how much we break our vocal chords shouting on the streets of the world, the government will
never listen and will always serve the corporations which truly control it.
In order to make changes happen, we must understand how we arrived here.

First, we have been lured to come to the poorly designed cities where we could not grow our own organic food, and where
we need to work in order to have access to the most resources basic for human survival.

Then, they supply us with industrialized processed food, neurotoxic vaccines and chemical drugs, where safer organic
competitions from the countryside are deliberately stifled through the use of the police.

Consumerism has made us too vulnerable for totalitarian control later on.

The physical and psychological stresses of home mortgage and junk foods defeat the conveniences of city living. In fact, we
cannot afford to describe it as living anymore, but merely surviving. We cant go on with this same regressive trajectory. We
cannot redesign our cities while most of us are still inside any of them.
We need to step back. We need to go back to the countryside and start growing our own food organically. We need to
remove the power weve given them.

While building our organic permacultured farms, we must take all the bad urban experiences into consideration, and take the
necessary measures to avoid them.

By doing so, we will be empowering ourselves, and thats how we regain our long lost freedoms.

Related: Pesticides as Bad for Kids Lungs as Cigarettes, Says New Study

The Cult Of 'Scientism' Explained: How Scientific Claims Behind Cancer, Vaccines,
Psychiatric Drugs And GMOs Are Nothing More Than Corporate-Funded Science
Fraud
April 27 2016 | From: NaturalNews

Sadly, what often passes for "science" today in the world of health is little more than "Scientism" -
a dangerous cult founded on irrational dogma and faith-based beliefs in faulty, fraudulent ideas
being paraded as science.
A common trait that weaves its way through every topic of "Scientism" is corporate profits. Any time something is
being pushed with aggressive demands of "SCIENCE!" that also happens to enrich wealthy corporations, it's
probably based on fraud, not real science. Perpetrators of fraudulent scientism include Paul Offit, Dr. David Gorski,
Monsanto pal Bill Nye, discredited biotech shill and former Forbes.com writer Jon Entine and too many others to
even name.

In this HealthRangerReport.com podcast, I explain the truth about the Cult of Scientism, sometimes called the "Church of
Scientific Mysticism." This cult currently dominates the "official" dogma concerning vaccines, GMOs, fluoride, cancer,
diabetes, pharmaceuticals, biosludge and more.

Highly recommended reading: Science for Sale by Dr. David Lewis.

The Myth Of Mental Illness: Psychiatry Is A Fraud And It Is All About Control +
Opposition Defiant Disorder - Non-Conformity And Anti-Authoritarianism Now
Considered An Illness
April 27 2016 | From: Sott / WakeUpWorld / Various

Perhaps most radically, Thomas Szasz deemed mental illness a mythic and monstrous beast, and
proclaimed that 'mental illness' was a fiction. Insanity, he has continued ever since to claim, is not
a real disease, whose nature has been progressively scientifically unveiled; mental illness is rather
a myth, forged by psychiatrists for their own greater glory.

Over the centuries, medical men and their supporters have been involved, argues Szasz, in a self-serving
'manufacture of madness.' In this, he indicts both the pretensions of organic psychiatry and the psychodynamic
followers of Freud, whose notion of the 'unconscious' in effect breathed new life into the obsolete metaphysical
Cartesian dualism.

Related: Think Antidepressants Work?

For Szasz, any expectation of finding the etiology of mental illness in body or mind - above all in some mental underworld -
must be a lost cause, a dead-end, a linguistic error, and even an exercise in bad faith.

'Mental illness' or the 'unconscious' are not realities but at best metaphors. In promoting such ideas, psychiatrists
have either been involved in improper cognitive imperialism or have rather naively pictorialized the psyche - reifying
the fictive substance behind the substantive.
Properly speaking, contends Szasz, insanity is not a disease with origins to be excavated, but a behavior with
meanings to be decoded. Social existence is a rule-governed game-playing ritual in which the mad person bends the rules
and exploits the loopholes.

Since the mad person is engaged in social performances that obey certain expectations so as to defy others, the pertinent
questions are not about the origins, but about the conventions, of insanity. In this light, Szasz dismisses traditional
approaches to the history of madness, as questions mal post and aims to reformulate them.

[From: Porter, R., Introduction, in Porter, R. and Wright, D., eds.,The Confinement of the Insane: International Perspectives,
1800-1965(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)]

Read more about Thomas Szasz and his views on The Myth of Mental Illness

Opposition Defiant Disorder - Non-Conformity And Anti-Authoritarianism Now

Considered An Illness
The Brave New World of Mental Health Disorders.

Related: 4 Things to Check Before Taking an Antidepressant

If Albert Einstein was a youth today, theres a good chance he would be saddled with an Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder (ADHD) diagnosis, possibly even Opposition Defiant Disorder (ODD) as well. He ignored his teachers, failed
college entrance examinations several times and was hard-pressed in holding down a job.

In Einstein: The Life and Times, biographer Ronald Clark argues that Einsteins problem wasnt attention deficits at all, but
rather a hatred of authoritarian, Prussian influences in school.
 The teachers in the elementary school appeared to me like sergeants and in the gymnasium the teachers were
like lieutenants, Einstein once remarked.

The fact that he read Kants difficult Critique of Pure Reason for pleasure is quite revealing. He also refused to prepare for
college admissions out of rebellion to his fathers unbearable path of practical profession. When he did gain entrance to
college, one of his professors chided Einstein, You have one fault; one cant tell you anything. The very characteristics that
troubled authorities, were exactly the ones which helped him to excel.

Considering Einsteins life history, it makes one wonder about the rampant use of ADHD and ODD diagnosis that are
plaguing our children and teenagers today. According to the statistical research by Russell Barkley, Ph.D., on average for
every 30 children, 1-3 have ADHD.

Of these children, 65% have issues with defiance, non-compliance and problems with authority figures, which can manifest
as verbal hostility and temper tantrums. Its estimated that between 1-16% of all American children have ODD. The real
question, however, is not how many diagnosis there have been, but rather should we be looking at ADHD and ODD as a
mental illness in the first place?

The Age of Excessive Diagnosis, Conformity and Over-Medication

No other time in history has the public had such access to pharmaceuticals for alleged mental illness. Once reserved for
extreme cases of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, mania and suicidal depression, today we have a veritable free-for-all in
diagnosis - and subsequent drugging - of any mental state we find the least bit inconvenient.

Take ADHD.

For these children, sitting still in a classroom - under fluorescent lighting and being bombarded with EMFs from cell phones
and wi-fi - completely removed from the natural world and pumped full of preservatives, artificial additives, GMOs, pesticides
and sugar, is simply impossible.
Their sensitive bodies and minds cannot take the onslaught. Instead of extending outdoor time and cleaning up the diet,
recess has been slashed and poor quality food remains the norm. Worse, they are drugged into submission with the likes of
Evekeo, Adderall, Concerta and Ritalin - several of which are amphetamines. (For more on this topic, please see: The
Fictions Surrounding ADHD and the Chemical Imbalance Theory of Mental Illness.)

Writes Bruce Levine, Ph.D., in Why Anti-Authoritarians are Diagnosed as Mentally Ill:

A 2009 Psychiatric Times article titled ADHD & ODD: Confronting the Challenges of Disruptive Behavior reports
that disruptive disorders, which include attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and opposition defiant
disorder (ODD), are the most common mental health problem of children and teenagers.

ADHD is defined by poor attention and distractibility, poor self-control and impulsivity, and hyperactivity.

ODD is defined as a a pattern of negativistic, hostile, and defiant behavior without the more serious violations of
the basic rights of others that are seen in conduct disorder; and ODD symptoms include often actively defies or
refuses to comply with adult requests or rules and often argues with adults.

One of the leading mainstream mental healths authorities on ADHD, psychologist Russell Barkley believes that those
afflicted with ADHD are deficient in what he classifies as rule-governed behavior, since they are less open to established
authorities and not as responsive to positive or negative consequences.

Those with ODD also have these so-called deficits. Because of this, its exceptionally common for young people to be
diagnosed with both ADHD and ODD.

But as Levine rightly observes, Do we really want to diagnose and medicate everyone with deficits in rule-
governed behavior?
A scene from the excellent film starring Robin Williams: The Dead Poets Society

Some of our greatest freethinkers throughout history were non-conformists and challenged authority. At what point do we
simply become a nation of zombies, drugged out on pharmaceuticals, unable to think for ourselves?

People have become increasingly socialized to associate inattention, anger, anxiety and paralyzing despair with a medical
condition, and subsequently rely on medical intervention instead of political remedies.

What better way to maintain the status quo than to view inattention, anger, anxiety, and depression as
biochemical problems of those who are mentally ill rather than normal reactions to an increasingly authoritarian
society, said Levine.

He believes we desperately need anti-authoritarians to question, test and oppose illegitimate authorities and regain trust in
their own common sense.

And yet, were moving into deeper authoritarian waters by the day. A good example is the newest addition of the DSM-IV
(Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). ODD is actually a new label in the manual, defined as ongoing
pattern of disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior, where symptoms include negativity, questioning authority,
argumentativeness and irritability.

ODD joins the ranks of other, newly created mental illnesses disorders like arrogance, narcissism, exceptional creativity,
cynicism and antisocial tendencies. Keep in mind that over the last 50 years, the manual has been prolific in creating new
afflictions, with the total number of mental illness classifications rising from 130 to 357.
Also remember that each mental illness has a pharmaceutical counterpart used in treatment. But at what cost to the soul
of humanity?

George F. Will provides a possible answer in an article for Washington Post, Handbook suggests that deviations from
normality are disorders:

"Another danger is that childhood eccentricities, sometimes inextricable from creativity, might be labeled
disorders to be cured. If 7-year-old Mozart tried composing his concertos today, he might be diagnosed with
attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and medicated into barren normality."

In the face of such bizarre and chilling authoritarian mental illness classifications, the famous quote by Jiddu Krishnamurti
comes to mind:

"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society."

About the Author:

Carolanne Wright enthusiastically believes if we want to see change in the world, we need to be the change. As a
nutritionist, natural foods chef and wellness coach, Carolanne has encouraged others to embrace a healthy lifestyle of
organic living, gratefulness and joyful orientation for over 13 years.

Through her website Thrive-Living.net, she looks forward to connecting with other like-minded people from around the world
who share a similar vision. You can also follow Carolanne on Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest.

Related: Do 5 Million Americans Really Have Bipolar Disorder?

Bang: Robert De Niro Wakes Up And Opens Up On Vaccines + Another Vaccine
Whistleblower Steps Out Of The Shadows
April 18 2016 | From: JonRappoport / AustralianNationalReview / Infowars / Various

On NBCs Today Show, Robert De Niro just broke his trance and started talking sense about
vaccines. He refused to back down and knuckle under. Watch the interview here.

Its the leading edge of a new storm. De Niro wouldnt accept the canned notion that vaccines are remarkably safe
and effective and necessary. He expressed doubts. He linked vaccines to autism. He stood with the mothers who
know their children were tragically damaged after being vaccinated.

Related: Vaccine Maker Admits, On FDA Website, That DTaP Vaccine Causes Autism

You could say this is too little too late, because the actor already canceled Vaxxed (trailer) at Tribeca, his film festival, but it
isnt too late. Vaxxed is playing in New York at the Angelika Theater (through April 21). Its going to travel. The demand for it
is great.

Trailer: Vaxxed From Cover Up to Catastrophe

Again, watch De Niros interview.

So let me now broach the wider subject of medically caused death and damage, because the background is essential to
understanding the medical edifice, and why the media, at the deepest level, must remain silent.
 If instead of drugs like warfarin, dabigatran, levofloxacin, carboplatin, and lisinopril (the five leading killers in the
FDA database), the massive numbers of deaths per year were led by gingko, ginseng, vitamin D, niacin, and raw
milk, what do you think would happen?

Ill tell you what would happen. SEALS, Delta Force, SWAT teams, snipers, predator drones, tanks, and infantry
would be attacking every health-food store in America. The resulting fatalities would be written off as necessary
collateral damage in the fight to keep America safe and healthy.

- Why the FDA should be charged with murder, Jon Rappoport

I know major media wont reveal medically-caused death numbers, because Ive published reports for years, and Ive
contacted news people with the facts; and nothing happens.

So we begin with a few citations.

July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association; author, Dr. Barbara Starfield, revered public health expert at the
Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; Is US health really the best in the world?

Starfield reported that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans a year. 106,000 as a result of FDA-approved medical
drugs, and 119,000 as a result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals. Extrapolate the numbers to a decade: thats 2.25
million deaths. You might want to read that last number again.

I interviewed Starfield in 2009. I asked her whether she was aware of any overall effort by the US government to eliminate
this holocaust, and whether she had ever been contacted by any government agency to consult on such an effort. She
answered a resounding no to both questions.

Here is another citation: BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989). Author, Jeanne Lenzer. Lenzer refers to a report by the
Institute for Safe Medication Practices:
 It calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing
serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths."

The report called this one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity.

The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDAs own database of serious adverse
[medical-drug] events.

Therefore, to say the FDA isnt aware of this finding would be absurd. The FDA knows. The FDA knows and it isnt saying
anything about it, because the FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all the medical drugs that are routinely maiming and
killing Americans.

Previously, I have documented that the FDA knows; because the FDA had, until recently, a page on its own website that
admits 100,000 people are killed every year by medical drugs, and two million more people are severely injured by the
drugs. A few months ago, the page was removed.

Why wont major media report these facts?

The obvious reason: their big-spending pharmaceutical advertisers would drop them like hot potatoes.

But there are other reasons.

Every medical bureaucrat or medical shill or medical expert who jumps aboard the media train, to assure the public that
drugs and vaccines are remarkably safe, is sitting on the time bomb I have described above.

This is a key, key fact. If this bomb were widely recognized, who would continue to believe these professional liars? Who
would accept anything they say? How could they possibly sustain their credibility?
 "Well, the system I represent kills 2.25 million people per decade, and maims between 20 and 40 million more
people per decade, but I want to assure you this vaccine presents no problems at all. Its incredibly safe.

It would be on the order of Joseph Stalin, who sent 20-40 million people to their deaths, stating that hard work in harsh
conditions improved general health.

Every single pronouncement, on any subject, issued via the medical cartels Ministry of Truth would fall on disbelieving ears,
and only increase general outrage. The assuring attitudes of its professional representatives would immediately be taken as
rank fraud of the worst kind.

And this would just be the beginning of the trouble.

Mainstream reporters and editors and publishers are well aware that telling the truth and continuing to pound on it would do
great damage to the whole medical system. The fact that the damage is deserved is beside the point. Undermining a basic
institution of society is not on the medias calendar.

VAXXED: The ABC News Interview that Big Pharma Didn't Want You to See
This is the full UNCUT interview that ABC World News conducted with Del Bigtree of the "VAXXED" documentary
now censored by Robert De Niro and the Tribeca Film Festival.

ABC News used only five seconds from this interview... Find out what else they didn't want you to see...

The media are there to give credibility to society and its structures. Thats why theyre called major instead of minor.

When hard rains fall, the media are there with an umbrella to hold over organized societys head. To walk away in the
middle of a downpour would leave the status quo unprotected.
Defending the Crown is another way to put it. The King may make mistakes, he may commit heinous offenses, but he is
the King, and therefore his position must remain secure.

Young journalists learn this point quickly. If in their zeal, they cross the threshold and attempt to expose a central myth, fairy
tale, legend, theyre put back in their place.

They absorb the message. Journalism has limits. Certain truths are silent truths.

Over the years, Ive talked to reporters who are solidly addicted to obfuscations. Like any addict, they have an army of
excuses to rationalize their behavior. Theyre all attitude. They snarl and grouse if you push them too far. They assert their
position, as if they own their territory, as if theyve earned their titles.

They remind me of drunks with significant bank accounts. Theyre not winos drifting in alleys. Oh no. They imbibe the good
stuff. They take pride in that.

The medical experts are worse. Their pretense of idealism knows no limits, and is matched only by their claim to bullet-proof
knowledge. They resemble elite new anchors, who above all learn superior acting skills. The central mission of both
professionals: sound and appear utterly convincing.
What would you do if you were an actor working in a major Broadway production, along with several actors who were, in real
life, murderers? Every night you go out on the boards and do your turns, and you know the play is, in a real sense, a cover
for the terrible deeds your partners are committing.

I can tell you what news anchors and reporters do in that situation. They polish their performance, hoping to establish such a
high degree of credibility that the secrets they conceal will never be suspected, or God forbid, exposed.

When you peel the veneer away, they are enablers, persons of interest, co-conspirators. There is nothing quite like a high-
minded, socially-positioned, card-carrying member of the Kings circle of protectors. The arrogance is titanic. Because what
is being protected is so explosive.

225,000 deaths a year at the hands of modern medicine. Two to four million maimings. 2.25 million deaths per
decade. The Crown is responsible. The Crown commits these crimes.

And yet it is the duty of the Crown to make his subjects feel safe and protected and even loved. No wonder he needs such a
large army of trained helpers in and around the press. He has them.

But their monopoly is breaking down. Were at the beginning of a new breakout level of truth. Stay tuned.

New Documentary: Whistleblower Claims CDC Covered up Vaccine-Autism Links

The debate over whether vaccines cause autism has become one of the most controversial disputes of late. In this
episode of Truth In Media, the focus is not on whether vaccines are responsible for autism.

Related: Vaccines contain DNA fragments from aborted human fetal cells and viruses that could cause both autism
and cancer

The issue at hand here is a study that was performed at the CDC and the question of whether the agency was complicit in a
cover-up over a decade ago. Watch the documentary here. Background information and supporting documents included
below:
For nearly two years, Truth In Media has explored the allegations of Dr. William Thompson, a CDC scientist who came
forward in 2014, hired a whistleblower attorney, and claimed that important data regarding a study on vaccines and autism
was eliminated.

Thompsons claims have led to a divide among Americans, with some believing that Thompsons allegations are credible
and should be investigated further, and others convinced that the documents Thompson handed over mean absolutely
nothing. In December 2015, Ben Swann was the first journalist to obtain the documents from Congressman Bill Posey.

In this episode, Swann further examines not only Thompsons claims, but also the documents related to the study, with the
assistance of doctors, journalists, authors and former CDC specialists who joined Swann in discussing every document that
was handed over. Watch the documentary here.

Another Vaccine Whistleblower Steps Out of the Shadows

The new film Vaxxed (trailer) highlights one whistleblower, researcher William Thompson, who
publicly admitted he and his CDC colleagues lied, cheated, and committed gross fraud in
exonerating the MMR vaccine and pretending it had no connection to autism.
Related: Courts confirm link between MMR and Autism

Now we have another: Dr. Peter Fletcher.

The Daily Mail has the story (3/29/16): Former [British] science chief: MMR fears coming true.

"A former Government medical officer responsible for deciding whether medicines are safe has accused the
Government of utterly inexplicable complacency over the MMR triple vaccine for children.

Dr Peter Fletcher, who was Chief Scientific Officer at the Department of Health, said if it is proven that the jab
causes autism, the refusal by governments to evaluate the risks properly will make this one of the greatest
scandals in medical history.

He added that after agreeing to be an expert witness on drug-safety trials for parents lawyers, he had received
and studied thousands of documents relating to the case which he believed the public had a right to see.

He said he has seen a steady accumulation of evidence from scientists worldwide that the [MMR] measles,
mumps and rubella jab is causing brain damage in certain children.

But he added: There are very powerful people in positions of great authority in Britain and elsewhere who have
staked their reputations and careers on the safety of MMR and they are willing to do almost anything to protect
themselves.

In the late Seventies, Dr. Fletcher served as Chief Scientific Officer at the DoH [Dept. of Health] and Medical
Assessor to the Committee on Safety of Medicines, meaning he was responsible for deciding if new vaccines were
safe.

He first expressed concerns about MMR in 2001, saying safety trials before the vaccines introduction in Britain
were inadequate.

Now he says the theoretical fears he raised appear to be becoming reality.

He said the rising tide of autism cases and growing scientific understanding of autism-related bowel disease have
convinced him the MMR vaccine may be to blame.

Clinical and scientific data is steadily accumulating that the live measles virus in MMR can cause brain, gut and
immune system damage in a subset of vulnerable children, he said.

Theres no one conclusive piece of scientific evidence, no smoking gun, because there very rarely is when
adverse drug reactions are first suspected. When vaccine damage in very young children is involved, it is harder to
prove the links.

But it is the steady accumulation of evidence, from a number of respected universities, teaching hospitals and
laboratories around the world, that matters here. Theres far too much to ignore. Yet government health authorities
are, it seems, more than happy to do so.

The pressure is building on the medical establishment and their press lackeys. Of course, they will try to keep the lid on. But
more and more people around the world - many through bitter personal experience with vaccines - are waking up.

The statements of establishment front men ring hollow.

"Well, of course these vaccines are safe, remarkably so. How could any sane person think otherwise?
Sane people are thinking otherwise. They know theyre being conned, and their health and the health of their children is
under attack.

More whistleblowers are going to come out of the closet. The strange notion of having an actual conscience is making a
comeback.

Even media androids, whose job it is to spread disinformation, are going to realize theyre nothing more than dupes for the
vaccine cartel. And some of them arent going to like the realization, especially when it interrupts their sleep at night.

Especially as they come to understand theyre aiding and abetting the lifelong infliction of brain damage on innocent
children.

Not everyone can blithely go on their way, doing their dirty work, in the face of that knowledge.

Ive been working as an independent reporter for 30 years, and I can tell you that at this point, the whole vaccine
propaganda apparatus is like a porcelain vase sitting on a table. And an earthquake is commencing.

Somewhere, right now, as I write this, a vaccine expert none of us yet knows about is sitting in his office thinking:
Thompson and Fletcher have come forward. It might be time for me to tell what I know, what Ive been hiding all these
years.

He isnt a hero. Hes a chronic scientific liar who cant stand the conspiracy of silence any longer. Hes remembering what a
conscience is. And hes calculating the relative consequences of voluntarily coming clean now vs. being exposed later.

Hes sniffing which way the new wind is blowing.

Autism Cover-Up Investigative Documentary 2016 on CDC and Vaccines

Auckland: No Consultation Needed ForStopping Or Starting Fluoridation +

Fluoridation Decision Is An Attack On Democracy
April 16 2016 | From: FluorideAlert / Scoop

Chair of Auckland Councils Policy and Strategy committee decided unilaterally yesterday that a
petition from Fluoride Free New Zealand could be received but not debated on. This left councillors
no option other than to vote to accept the petition or not.

The petition to Council was over the illegal fluoridation of some Franklin communities.

Related: Professional Perspectives on Water Fluoridation

In 2014 Watercare changed the source of water to the Franklin communities of Buckland, Patumahoe, Clarks Beach, Waiau
Beach and Glenbrook Beach to a fluoridated supply. These communities had never had fluoridation in the past. Council was
made aware of this last week through a petition that was lodged with the Council.

Council should have been allowed to have a discussion on this and then decide what should be done. Instead, one
councillor has dictated to the entire council.

He decided the issue could not be considered even though it is hugely signifcant and puts Auckland Council in the position
of endorsing the fluoridation of these communities without the required consultation and without even advising the residents
of this important change to their water supply.
It is also concerning that only one councillor was provided with the legal advice that Watercare obtained and this advice was
denied to other councillors. According to the councillor who received it, Watercare said that their only obligation was to
provide potable water and adding fluoridation chemicals to the drinking water did not make the water less potable.

If this argument can be used to start fluoridation without consultation then the same argument can be used to stop
fluoridation as not adding fluoridation chemicals to drinking water, definitely does not make a water supply less potable. In
fact this decision means not only can councils stop fluoridation without consultation, they dont even have to notify anyone.

According to the 2002 Local Government Body Act, councils are legally required to consult communities on issues of
significance.

Since then all other councils have considered fluoridation to be an issue of significance and fluoridation has not been
stopped or started without some form of consultation such as a referendum, Tribunal style process, or inclusion in the draft
annual plan.

In 2010 when the Kapiti Coast Council nearly stopped fluoridation, the Ministry of Health threatened to instigate a judicial
review as they did not believe they had been sufficiently consulted. This was despite the fact that Kapiti Coast Council had
undertaken consultation via the draft annual plan process.

It is highly likely that if any council in New Zealand chose to stop fluoridation without public consultation the
Ministry of Health would legally challenge that decision.

Auckland Council is now ignoring the law, and astonishingly has allowed Watercare, an Auckland Council owned business
contracted to the Council to provide water services, and not elected by the community, to ride roughshod over the Franklin
residents.

Where is democracy at Auckland Council if councillors are not even allowed to discuss important petitions that are put
before them?

The meeting can be viewed here.

Related: Quotes from professionals on fluoridation - 2007

Fluoridation Decision Is An Attack On Democracy

The government's decision to take fluoridation responsibility away from councils has been labelled "another attack
on democracy", by Democrats for Social Credit deputy leader Chris Leitch.

Related: Fluoride Officially Classified As A Neurotoxin In Worlds Most Prestigious Medical Journal

In putting those decisions in the hands of District Health Boards, the Minister has forced those against fluoridation to have to
deal with their main opponents in previous council fora.

District Health Boards have spent large sums of money on fighting pro fluoridation campaigns - money that should have
been spent on improving people's food and drink choices.

The democratic decisions of hard fought referenda will be cast aside, and New Zealand will be heading in the opposite
direction to the rest of the world which has been getting rid of water fluoridation.

Our Daily Dose

Related: Leading Physician Joins Calls for Federal Investigation of Water Fluoridation

Five Amazing Properties Of Sunlight You've Never Heard About

April 15 2016 | From: GreenMedInfo

Sunlight is well-known to provide us vitamin D, but did you know that it kills pain, keeps us alert at
night, burns fat and more...

Our biological connection and dependence to the sun is so profound, that the very variation in human skin color
from African, melanin-saturated dark skin, to the relatively melanin de-pigmented, Caucasian lighter-skin, is a
byproduct of the offspring of our last common ancestor from Africa (as determined by mitochondrial DNA)
migrating towards sunlight-impoverished higher latitudes, which began approximately 60,000 years ago.

In order to compensate for the lower availability of sunlight, the body rapidly adjusted, essentially requiring the removal of
the natural "sunscreen" melanin from the skin, which interferes with vitamin D production; vitamin D, of course, is involved in
the regulation of over 2,000 genes, and therefore is more like a hormone, without which our entire genetic infrastructure
becomes destabilized.

While the health benefits of vitamin D are well-documented (GreenMedInfo.com has identified over 200 health conditions
that may benefit from optimizing vitamin D levels: Vitamin D Health Benefits page, and Henry Lahore's Vitamin D Wiki has
far more), the therapeutic properties of sunlight are only now being explored in greater depth by the research community.

Below are detailed five noteworthy properties of sunlight exposure:

1) Sunlight Has Pain-Killing (Analgesic) Properties:

A 2005 study published in the journal Psychosomatic Medicine titled, "The effect of sunlight on postoperative analgesic
medication use: a prospective study of patients undergoing spinal surgery," analyzed patients staying on the bright
side of the hospital unit who were exposed to 46% higher-intensity sunlight on average. The patients exposed to an
increased intensity of sunlight experienced less perceived stress, marginally less, took 22% less analgesic medication per
hour, and had 21% less pain medication costs.

2) Sunlight Burns Fat:

A 2011 study published in The Journal of Investigative Dermatology revealed a remarkable fact of metabolism: The
exposure of human skin to UV light results in increased subcutaneous fat metabolism. While subcutaneous fat, unlike
visceral fat, is not considered a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, it is known that a deficiency of one of sunlight's best
known beneficial byproducts, vitamin D, is associated with greater visceral fat. Also, there is a solid body of research
showing that vitamin D deficiency is linked to obesity, with 9 such studies on our obesity research page.
One of them, titled "Association of plasma vitamin D levels with adiposity in Hispanic and African Americans," and which
was published in the journal Anticancer Research in 2005, found that vitamin D levels were inversely associated with
adiposity in Hispanics and African-Americans, including abdominal obesity. The point? Exposure to UVB radiation, which is
most abundant two hours on either side of solar noon and responsible for producing vitamin D, may be an essential strategy
in burning fat, the natural way.

3) Sunlight via Solar Cycles May Directly Regulate Human Lifespan:

Published in 2010 in the journal Medical Hypotheses and titled, "The effect of solar cycles on human lifespan in the 50
United states: variation in light affects the human genome," researchers review the possibility that solar cycles directly
affect the human genome. According to the researchers:

"In the current study we report that those persons conceived and likely born during the peaks (MAX approximately
3 years) of approximately 11-year solar cycles lived an average 1.7 years less than those conceived and likely
born during non-peaks (MIN approximately 8 years).

Increased energy at solar MAX, albeit relatively a small 0.1% increase from MIN, apparently modifies the human
genome/epigenome and engenders changes that predispose to various diseases, thereby shortening lifespan. It is
likely that same energy increases beneficial variety in the genome which may enhance adaptability in a changing
environment."

Sunlight exposure, therefore, may directly affect the length of our life, and may even accelerate genetic changes that may
confer a survival advantage.

4) Daytime Sunlight Exposure Improves Evening Alertness:

A 2012 study published in the journal Behavioral Neuroscience titled, "Effects of prior light exposure on early evening
performance, subjective sleepiness, and hormonal secretion," found that subjects felt significantly more alert at the
beginning of the evening after being exposed to 6 hours of mainly daylight exposure, whereas they became sleepier at the
end of the evening after artificial light exposure.

5) Sunlight May Convert To Metabolic Energy:

If a novel hypothesis published in 2008 in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine is correct, a longstanding
assumption that animals are incapable of utilizing light energy directly is now called into question. In other words, our skin
may contain the equivalent of melanin "solar-panels," and it may be possible to "ingest" energy, as plants do, directly from
the Sun.

Melanin has a diverse set of roles in various organisms. From the ink of the octopus, to the melanin-based protective
colorings of bacteria and fungi, melanin offers protection against a variety of threats: from predators and similar biochemical
threats (host defenses against invading organisms), UV light, and other chemical stresses (i.e. heavy metals and oxidizing
agents). Commonly overlooked, however, is melanin's ability to convert gamma and ultraviolet radiation into metabolic
energy within living systems.
Single-celled fungi, for instance, have been observed thriving within the collapsed nuclear reactor at Chernobyl, Ukraine,
using gamma radiation as a source of energy. Albino fungi, without melanin, were studied to be incapable of using gamma
radiation in this way, proving that gamma rays initiate a yet-unknown process of energy production within exposed melanin.

Vertebrate animals may also convert light directly into metabolic energy through the help of melanin. In a
review titled, "Melanin directly converts light for vertebrate metabolic use: heuristic thoughts on birds, Icarus and dark
human skin," Geoffrey Goodman and Dani Bercovich offer a thought-provoking reflection on the topic, the abstract of which
is well worth reading in its entirety:

"Pigments serve many visually obvious animal functions (e.g. hair, skin, eyes, feathers, scales). One is 'melanin',
unusual in an absorption across the UV-visual spectrum which is controversial. Any polymer or macro-structure of
melanin monomers is 'melanin'. Its roles derive from complex structural and physical-chemical properties e.g.
semiconductor, stable radical, conductor, free radical scavenger, charge-transfer.

Clinicians and researchers are well acquainted with melanin in skin and ocular pathologies and now increasingly
are with internal, melanized, pathology-associated sites not obviously subject to light radiation (e.g. brain,
cochlea).

At both types of sites some findings puzzle: positive and negative neuromelanin effects in Parkinsons; unexpected
melanocyte action in the cochlea, in deafness; melanin reduces DNA damage, but can promote melanoma; in
melanotic cells, mitochondrial number was 83% less, respiration down 30%, but development similar to normal
amelanotic cells.

A little known, avian anatomical conundrum may help resolve melanin paradoxes. One of many unique adaptations
to flight, the pecten, strange intra-ocular organ with unresolved function(s), is much enlarged and heavily
melanized in birds fighting gravity, hypoxia, thirst and hunger during long-distance, frequently sub-zero, non-stop
migration.

The pecten may help cope with energy and nutrient needs under extreme conditions, by a marginal but critical,
melanin-initiated conversion of light to metabolic energy, coupled to local metabolite recycling.

Similarly in Central Africa, reduction in body hair and melanin increase may also have lead to
'photomelanometabolism' which, though small scale/ unit body area, in total may have enabled a sharply increased
development of the energy-hungry cortex and enhanced human survival generally.
 Animal inability to utilize light energy directly has been traditionally assumed. Melanin and the pecten may have
unexpected lessons also for human physiology and medicine."

The Science Is Conclusive: Mobile Phones Cause Cancer

April 12 2016 | From: TheEpochTimes

They say theres only two things constant in this life: death and taxes. But a third viable contender
might be cancer, which an extensive cohort of scientific research has found is caused by
prolonged exposure to radiation from cell phones and their associated communication towers.

Contrary to what you may have heard in the mainstream news, mobile phones and the antennas that allow them to
communicate emit powerful, microwave radio frequencies capable of penetrating our bodies and cells. And
constant exposure to these frequencies, according to the science, appears to be one of the leading causes of
cancer in the modern age.
Watch: Do Phones Cause Cancer?

Wireless Phone Radiation Can Lead to Brain Cancer

Extensive research into the connection between cell phone radiation and cancer has linked this ubiquitous modern
technology to two main types of brain tumors: gliomas and acoustic neuromas. Information compiled by
the ElectricSense.com has confirmed the following findings with regard to cell phones and brain cancer.

1) An independent study commissioned by U.S. wireless carrier T-Mobile found that cell phone radiation directly initiates
and promotes the formation of cancer:
HESE-Project.org.[PDF]

2) The renowned Interphone study also found that regular cell phone use at just 30 minutes per day over 10 years
increases the risk of gliomas by 40 percent. It also found that tumors were more likely to form on the side of the head where
a cell phone is most prominently held:
BioInitiative.org.[PDF]

3) A review of 23 epidemiological studies conducted by seven scientists concluded that cell phones cause a harmful
association between cell phones and cancer. The only included studies that didnt suggest this were lower quality ones
that researchers say failed to meet scientific best practices - these studies were all funded by the mobile phone industry:

NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov;
SFGate.com.

4) Researchers from the Hardell Research Group, which is noted for conducting what many consider to be the highest-
quality studies on the subject, found a consistent pattern of increased risks for both glioma and acoustic neuroma in
conjunction with mobile phone use:
PathophysiologyJournal.com.

5) A study out of France observed similar outcomes associated with prolonged exposure to electromagnetic frequencies
from mobile phones. Scientists noted higher rates of gliomas and temporal tumors from occupational and urban mobile
phone use.
In response, the EMF watchdog group Powerwatch noted that this study supports the categorization of mobile phone
radiation as a probable human carcinogen.

OEM.BMJ.com;
Powerwatch.org.uk.

6) A study of nearly 800,000 middle-aged UK women found that those who used cell phones for 10 years or more had a
250 percent increased risk of developing an acoustic neuroma. The longer the women used the phones, the higher their
risk:
SaferEMR.com.

7) Similarly, a study conducted by the group Lonn found that acoustic neuromas are increasingly more likely to develop the
longer a person uses a mobile phone:
NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov.

8) In Sweden, researchers studying adult brain tumor cases found that individuals with the highest cumulative use of
mobile phones also had the highest risk of developing brain cancer:
NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov.

9) The Hardell group conducted a study in 2009 which found that RF-EMFs from mobile and cordless phones are directly
associated with malignant brain tumors. This study specifically states that wireless radiation initiates and promotes
carcinogenesis:
NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov.

Related: Warning to All Cell Phone Users

Wireless Phone Radiation Also Triggers Pituitary, Thyroid, Stem Cell, Oral, Parotid, Lymph Node,
Breast, Blood, Prostate and Eye Cancers
 1) The bodys master gland, also known as the pituitary gland, is responsible for producing hormones and regulating
other key bodily systems. But a study out of France found that cell phone use greatly increases the risk that this important
gland will become cancerous:
MieuxPrevenir.Blogspot.fr.

2) The thyroid gland, which similarly produces hormones in addition to regulating body temperature, is also affected by
mobile phone radiation. An Israeli study found that rates of cell phone use are directly proportional to the risk of developing
thyroid gland cancer:
SaferEMR.com.

3) Many health experts would contend that solar radiation poses the greatest threat to healthy skin. But a study out of
Sweden found that melanoma risk is greatly accelerated by mobile phone use:
HIR.nu.

4) A controversial Powerwatch study found that cell phone use nearly triples the risk of neuroepithelial tumors, which are a
result of stem cell cancer:
Powerwatch.org.uk.

5) Another study out of Israel confirmed a direct association between cell phone use and cancers of the mouth.
Based on 460 cases of parotid gland tumors, researchers observed a direct association between mobile phone radiation
and cancers of the parotid, the salivary gland located right next to where users typically hold their phones:
AJE.OxfordJournals.org.

6) A separate study, also out of Israel, found that parotid gland cancers have increased in prevalence by 400 percent in the
country between 1970 and 2006, which scientists link to increased mobile phone use:
Journals.LWW.com.

7) An extensive review of more than 12 separate studies looking at health outcomes from exposure to radiation from
mobile phone, television and radio broadcast towers found that cancers in general, and specifically cancers of the brain and
blood (leukemia), are greatly increased:
Journals.LWW.com.

8) Lymph nodes, a key component of the immune system, dont like cell phone radiation much, either. An Australian study
found that typical exposure to cell phone radiation greatly increases lymphoma risk:
MicrowaveNews.com.[PDF]

9) Back in the U.S., a study looking at young women with breast cancer found that regular use of smartphones can trigger
the formation of breast cancer. This is especially true when women carry their phones in their blouses or bras, where
phones are pressed directly against the breasts.
Hindawi.com.

10) Researchers in Germany have also linked mobile phone radiation to uveal melanoma and other cancers of the eye:
NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov.

11) Practically every other type of cancer not covered by one of the aforementioned studies was identified in a large-scale
Brazilian study, which linked mobile phone radiation to cancers of the prostate, breasts, lungs, kidneys and liver. Shockingly,
more than 80 percent of identified deaths in Brazils third largest city, Belo Horizonte, occurred less than 500 meters away
from one of the citys 300 cell phone antennas:
WhyFry.org.

The Secret To Health By Dr. Edward F. Group

April 9 2016 | From: GlobalHealingCentre
"The Secret to Health" reveals information that has been suppressed by the medical establishment
for over 100 years.

Learn how you can restore your health, increase your energy, and take control of your health.

Everyday our bodies absorb thousands of toxins that are found in genetically modified foods (GMOs), pesticides, meat,
dairy, refined sugar, artificial sweeteners (ex: aspartame), and microwaved foods. Most diseases and illnesses are caused
by these toxins polluting our bodies. Find out what you can do in this 1.5 hour long video.

Dr. Edward F. Group III, DC, NP, DACBN, DCBCN, DABFM

Global Healing Center is the premier source for organic living and natural health. We offer a wide variety of high quality,
green living lifestyle products to help you maintain a clean body and live a healthy lifestyle. It's our mission to bring back
good health, positive thinking, happiness, and love.

We want to help our clients and customers help themselves and realize their body has self-healing mechanisms. We are
here to educate and provide the tools necessary to live a long, healthy, happy life.

The Disturbingly Aggressive Roll Out Of Smart AKA Advanced Meters - While Children
Starve And The Elderly Freeze In Rural Aotearoa (NZ)
April 8 2016 | From: EnvironmentWatchRangitikei

Here is a sign posted by a Taumaranui resident who had their locked meter box broken intoto
install a Smart Meter (aka Advanced Meter). As you can see the response they said they got from
the lines people when following this up was equally as telling we own you people!
While it appears little known that there are options for having these meters removed and replaced, it also seems
that Taumaranui has only one supplier. This makes things more difficult in terms of no bargaining power.

Related: Reports Of Illness Prompt Audit Of Smart Meter Radiation

The use of the term jack boot is therefore not that extreme given the whole scenario and the way these folks have been
treated. It is all symptomatic of the direction our country is headed with an ex-banker for a Prime Minister who clearly places
profits and corporate interests above the interests of his constituents.
 What is especially disturbing about this event
(and its not an isolated incident, Ive heard
myself of installations happening while folk
were not home) is that in the comments and
discussion around this, many others have
been similarly treated.

The repeated tale of outrageous hikes in

charges, one for instance from $100 to $150
approx. plus the Nelson woman last year
who received a bill for $800 for her two
bedroom house!

And this is something Ive both read about &

heard, time and time again. We are fed the
line that the meters are more accurate and
customers have been undercharged prior to
Smart Meter installation.

Not to the tune of a $1000 hike? Surely?

yet this is what Ive heard more than
once. A difference of $20 is feasible but not
$600 or more. See here a proposed
explanation for these hikes by a
retired electrical engineer.

Disturbing also is the detail about the elderly

turning off their hot water in order to buy food
or not turning on any heating because they
cant pay.

Again I know of this happening in my district

(the Rangitikei) where an elderly person is
being charged $150 and upwards in a tiny
flat with few if any appliances operating.

She has switched off the hot water, has no

heater and goes to bed early to keep warm.

And finally, this sign and the comments

corroborate that folk are being pressured to
leave the district because of the costs. The
town is dying says the sign.

Now,on that topic, we have been led to believe for years that towns are dying because people somehow mysteriously
allowed it. They all moved away. We even had a prominent economist telling us recently that they were zombie towns and
pretty much had to go.

Well, people left because of decisions made by our respective governments to close down amenities and resources like the
hospitals, pharmacies and banking.

I know I remember it happening! It was about the time those governments had borrowed large sums of money and gotten
a once prosperous and fully employed nation into un-repayable debt, followed by Rogernomics and belt tightening for the
poorer folks, not the wealthy mind.

And the former being blamed for the debt while corporations enjoy huge tax breaks. And now this from the power companies
and we were told privatizing them would lower prices. Competition, the market and all that. Were still waiting nearly three
decades on.

"over 250 people have commented with some saying they had similar experiences with unexpectedly large
 power bills and problems after the installation of smart meters.

- Stuff.co.nz

Related: Major U.S. Utility: No Rational Basis For Smart Meters

As this sign very perceptively outlines folk, we are being ripped off and our southern clean, green paradise is fast morphing
into a fascist regime. Think, TPPA and all that has entailed in terms of keeping us out of the loop then claiming to seek our
feedback / opinion / input.

Their tactics provide the illusion of having sought our opinion it is nothing more folks, in case you hadnt already noticed.
See how they provide you with forms containing multi choice options none of which you wanted to choose anyway? Like the
recently proposed flag debacle that has cost the country $28 million. Shame.

Returning now to the Smart Meters themselves, be aware, they are NOT compulsory. If you already have one, there are
options about its removal and replacement. (If you dont have one yet, inform your powerco you do not consent to one in
writing in advance).

For further information on that Kiwis, visit stopsmartmeters.org.nz and note they have a page there explaining how to get rid
of a Smart Meter. The meters are also known here as Advanced Meters. (Folks from other countries, there are similar sites in
your countries, just google.)

You should also be aware that health professionals have warned about the health risks these meters carry. Predictably the
authorities deny this, however the stopsmartmeters website has already logged before and after testimonies from Kiwis who
had their Smart Meters removed. See also the links here for further information on that, with a video trailer featuring a health
professional explaining the effects from long term exposure to a Smart Meter.

See also in this video what the meters when in proximity do to your blood. Above all, educate yourself further by watching
the award winning doco Take Back Your Power by Josh Del Sol at his website. It is accessible for a very small charge. Or
consider holding a viewing in your town (contact stopsmartmeters for details). Further info on Smart Meters is also available
on our Smart Meter pages. Spread the word and resist this move.

Related: Top Biochemist Calls To Abolish Smart Meters, WiFi In Schools, And Baby Monitors

5 Facts On Cancer That Conventional Medicine Is Now Aggressively Claiming Are

Myths + Amish Have Lower Rates Of Cancer, Ohio State Study Shows
April 8 2016 | From: PreventDisease / InternalMedicine

According to the conventional wisdom of mainstream medicine, the world's leading health
practitioners in alternative, complementary and integrative medicine have it all wrong and are
misinforming millions in practice and on the internet with a barrage of myths and misconceptions
they claim are causing more harm to cancer patients.

Could this initiative to sway opinion by leading cancer authorities possibly, just possibly be related to the
revolution that is happening around the world - highlighting the dangers and ineffectiveness of toxic chemotherapy
and radiation, bringing cancer cures such as cannabis to the forefront, or the emerging mass markets now creating
awareness on the reality of our food and the consequences of the cancer industry itself?

Related: Illegal Cannabis Oil Cures Fathers Terminal Brain Cancer: He Will Continue Dosing

Fact #1: The Rise In All Types of Cancers Are Due To Our Modern Society Diets, Lifestyles and
Environment
Why The Cancer Industry Claims This Is a Myth

The claim is that our genes are responsible, combined with the fact that people are living long enough now to develop
cancer. It's because of our success in tackling infectious diseases and malnutrition that we now get cancer.
It's perfectly normal for DNA damage in our cells to build up as we age, and such damage can lead to cancer developing.
Cancer has existed as long as humans have.

The Reality

The only reason that people around the world today believe that our ancestors did not live past 100 years is because the
official data has been sparse. There are very few records that show (officially) the age of our ancestors before then 18th
century, but there is a reasonable amount of evidence suggesting there were many people living hundreds of years in
prehistory and beyond.

In all the skeletons collected in the history of paleoanthropology, scientists have only been able to identify a mere 200
possible cancer sightings dating to prehistoric times, and these identifications are far from certain.

Despite the numbers, when you look at the remains, it seems to indicate that malignancies were a "striking rarity" in ancient
times, but that evidence is hardly conclusive. We just don't know for sure, so to use any type of argument that cancer
existed or did not exist to any extent in prehistory involves making a great deal of assumptions.

So let's just focus on what has transpired in the last century alone: According to the U.S. National Center for Health
Statistics, Vital Statistics of the United States, from the early 1900s alone up to an including 2011, there was a greater than
3 fold increase in cancer death rates.

According to a 2013 featured report compiled by the American Cancer Society and other government and cancer advocacy
groups, progress has been made in the war on cancer. But what kind of progress? Declining mortality rates are not due to
decreases in incidence. More people are getting cancer, but they're staying alive longer.

Related: What The Cancer Industry Does Not Want You To Know About Chemotherapy and Radiation

What the cancer industry does not point out is that the trends clearly show that we haven't eliminated cancer to any extent,
but we have managed to be able to diagnose it and treat it and thus profit from the actual disease itself.

People globally are living longer but chronic debilitating conditions are becoming more prevalent.

Diagnosis and treatment are the money makers in this industry. Actual prevention is not. So when it comes to prevention,
conventional medicine has stuck its head in the sand.
Overall, cancer deaths began dropping in the 1990's, with death rates declining by 1.8 percent for men and 1.4 percent for
women between the years 2000-2009, according to the featured report. Children's death rates from cancer are also
declining at a pace of 1.8 percent per year, although incidence is still rising by about 0.5 percent annually.

Other cancers are also still on the rise though, including liver and pancreatic cancer and melanoma (among men).

A 2008 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science demonstrated how nutrition alone can have a
tremendous impact not only on prevention, but even on the treatment of cancer once you've been diagnosed.

This type of information is never emphasized by the medical community because they do not believe cancer can be treated
without either cutting, poisoning or burning cancerous tumors.

Fact #2: Super-foods and Herbs Can Prevent Cancer

Why The Cancer Industry Claims This Is a Myth

The claim is that specific fruits and vegetables you choose don't really matter. There's no such thing as a 'super-food' or
medicinally powerful herb and any assertion has no scientific basis.

The Reality

This one is just embarrassing for them. While there is not one super-food or herb that may cure all cancers, to suggest that
super-foods don't exist or that herbs are not medicinally powerful is reaching deep in the pits of ignorance. In fact, there is so
much evidence that super-foods exist and have anti-cancer properties, that any claims suggesting the opposite are a good
measure of where the credibility lies among many of these industry quacks that make such preposterous statements.

As of the date of this article, The American Cancer Society (ACS) appears to have removed references to "super foods" or
"super-foods" off of their website. Yet, several authors have written extensively about previous recommendations of the
ACS, specifically regarding the potential of super-foods to prevent cancer.

Northridge Hospital Medical Center lists several super foods using the ACS as a source. Calorielab.com has posted a super
food infographic also using ACS as a source. But information on super-foods on the ACS website does not appear to exist.
Cancer Research UK also discredits and discourages the use of super-foods On this page it states: "you shouldn't rely on
so-called super-foods to reduce the risk of cancer," and that super-foods "are unlikely to give you added health benefits over
and above what you would get from eating a varied and healthy diet."

One irritating problem that confuses the public is that most dietitians have no foundation of practical knowledge in nutrition.

They propagate mainstream opinion on the validity of the food pyramid - that bread, cereal and grains should be the
mainstay of our diets and that fruits and vegetables are all equal.

Most dietitians I know don't use the term super-food because they're not taught what super-foods are in school. The only
thing they are taught is that "super-foods" are non-medical terms popularized in the media to promote unsupported health-
promoting properties in foods.

A super-food can be summed up as any multi-tasking food with higher than average concentrations of disease-fighting
nutrients, which are usually in abundance among the antioxidant and phytonutrient rich profiles. Some suggest they are also
low in calories but that does not always apply to all super-foods

Some super-foods like blueberries just stand out above the rest. Out of Over 400 Compounds Analyzed, Red Grapes and
Blueberries Are Tops In Boosting Immunity.

Even WebMD.com, a very pro mainstream medical website lists 10 Everday Super Foods. Here they list foods such as
broccoli, berries, quinoa, beans, nuts, eggs and others which few can den are very nutrient dense foods with anti-cancer
properties.
It's not necessary, however, to spend any large sums of money for heavily promoted super-foods such as noni, acai,
mangosteen and other juices in an attempt to prevent cancer.

The top six foods with the highest antioxidant values on the ORAC (Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity) scale are
cheaper and more readily available than the more expensive alternatives and they all are proven to prevent cancer. They
include cloves, sumac, cinnamon, sorghum, oregano and turmeric.

For example extracts of black, red, and white sorghums had strong antiproliferative activity against human cancer cells.

Studies on animals with lung and skin cancers show that eugenol in cloves can stop cancer cells from multiplying. Clove oil
extract was found in one study to have maximal cytotoxic activity on cancer cells.

In fact there are 17 herbs and spices which in their own right are considered super-foods, and have been scientifically
proven to prevent and treat cancer.
Cannabis is one of the most powerful healing plants in the world and it makes cancer essentially disappear.

Cancer societies would certainly like cannabis to disappear because there is so much evidence that it prevents
cancer.

There are dozens of studies which prove cannabis cures cancer. A quick search on Pubmed for "cannabinoid" will yield
almost 18,000 results.

The reason cancer societies are now turning their heads to the power of super-foods and herbs is because they work. So
they must try and sway opinion in an attempt to convince millions who are now converting back to nature to prevent and
cure disease.

Fact #3: Acidic Diets Cause Cancer

Why The Cancer Industry Claims This Is a Myth

This is biological nonsense according to the cancer industry. The pH of the blood is tightly regulated by the kidneys within a
very narrow and perfectly healthy range. It can't be changed for any meaningful amount of time by what you eat. There's no
evidence to prove that diet can manipulate whole body pH, or that it has an impact on cancer.

The Reality

Part of the problem with this notion is that there has been a lot of misinformation spread around by so-called health gurus in
trade shows attempting to convince people that you can make dramatic shifts in the pH of your body through foods and
alkaline water. The truth is, you can't make huge shifts in blood alkalinity or acidity, but you can small shifts that are
significant enough to reverse cancer.

The pH of your blood is tightly regulated by a complex system of buffers that are continuously at work to maintain a range of
7.3 to 7.41, which is slightly more alkaline than pure water.

If the pH of your blood falls below 7.3, the result is a condition called acidosis, a state that leads to central nervous system
depression. Severe acidosis - where blood pH falls below 7.00 - can lead to a coma and even death. If the pH of your blood
rises above 7.45, the result is alkalosis.
The bottom line is that if you're breathing and going about your daily activities, your body is doing an adequate job of
keeping your blood pH somewhere between 7.3 to 7.41, and the foods that you are eating are not causing any wild
deviations of your blood pH.

However keeping your body closer to an alkaline state by even a few points up .05 can make a significant difference in how
well cancer grows or suppresses. Cancer cells can't live in an alkaline environment.

Related: The Man Who Discovered The Cause Of Cancer Wrote A Book On Curing It

The reason acidosis is more common in our society is mostly due to the typical American diet, which is far too high in acid-
producing animal products like meat, and dairy, and far too low in alkaline-producing foods like fresh vegetables.

Additionally, we eat acid-producing processed foods like white flour and sugar and drink acid-producing beverages like
coffee and soft drinks. We use too many drugs, which are acid-forming; and we use artificial chemical sweeteners like
NutraSweet, Equal, or aspartame, which are extremely acid-forming. One of the best things we can do to correct an overly-
acid body is to clean up the diet and lifestyle.
Dr. A. Keith Brewer explained that in alkaline environments and high pH condition, the acid toxins of the cancer cell are
neutralized and rendered nontoxic. Acidic toxins, and not the tumor lump per se, is what brings about the death of the host.
In the high pH condition, the life of the cancer cell is short. The dead cancer cells are readily absorbed by the system and
eliminated. "I am convinced that it is food that causes cancer, but it is the food we don't eat and not the food we do eat."

This condition forces the body to borrow minerals - including calcium, sodium, potassium and magnesium - from vital organs
and bones to buffer (neutralize) the acid and safely remove it from the body. Once a person is diagnosed with cancer, the
most effective way of reversing the disease is to move towards an alkaline diet and shift blood pH towards the 7.41 range.

This is accomplished most effectively with raw fruits and vegetables and daily greens which maximize phytonutrients and
enhance the immune system's potential to reverse cancer. No, the body will not dramatically shift blood pH, but it doesn't
need to for cancer cells to die. Even a small shift will reverse cancer and prevent the body from borrowing minerals from
organs and bones to compensate for a nutritionally deficient diet. That's where alkalizing agents come in.
Related: Jim Humble and MMS

I have seen stage IV cancer patients with tumors the size of footballs recover using alkalizing agents. It is beyond the scope
of this article to explain how alkalizing agents and pH therapy can eliminate cancer, however if you seek the assistance of
any Naturopathic Physician well-versed in cancer treatment, the protocols are fairly common although inconsistent.

The bottom line is that the body can achieve the metabolic accomplishment of keeping blood pH towards the alkaline
spectrum where cancer will not proliferate. The immune system can then thrive and signal recovery which is facilitated
through nutritional mechanisms and alkalizing agents to maximize recovery and make treatments such as chemotherapy,
radiation or surgery completely unnecessary.

Fact #4: Sugar Feeds Cancer

Why The Cancer Industry Claims This Is a Myth

They claim there is no evidence that cancer cells use glucose and produce energy in a different way from healthy cells. The
"sugar feeds cancer" myth distorts sensible dietary advice which must be based on nutritional and scientific fact.

The Reality

Understanding cancer cannot result from the view on a single cancer event, but must consider the combined action of all
cellular triggers in a given cellular background. There is little doubt in the scientific community that the high rate of
carbohydrate ingestion contributes to various metabolic diseases, including the development of aggressive cancer.

The medical establishment may be missing the connection between sugar and its role in tumorgenesis. Consider the million-
dollar positive emission tomography device, or PET scan, regarded as one of the ultimate cancer-detection tools. PET scans
use radioactively labeled glucose to detect sugar-hungry tumor cells. PET scans are used to plot the progress of cancer
patients and to assess whether present protocols are effective.

Domestic animals (e.g. cats and dogs) which usually consume western diets with a comparatively high glycemic index,
frequently suffer from aggressive cancer, whereas carnivore animals and herbivore animals do have a low rate of
metastasizing cancer and rarely die from this disease.
Both carnivores and herbivores predominantly live from proteins and fat/oil. Although herbivores ingest large amounts of
complex carbohydrates (cellulose and other fibres), these are fermented to fatty acids by bacteria within the gastrointestinal
tract and therefore exhibit an extremely low glycemic index. Limited release or even absence of glucose during digestion
may explain the low rates of cancer-caused mortality in herbivore and carnivore animals.

A four-year study at the National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection in the Netherlands compared 111
biliary tract cancer patients with 480 controls. Cancer risk associated with the intake of sugars, independent of other energy
sources, more than doubled for the cancer patients.

Furthermore, an epidemiological study in 21 modern countries that keep track of morbidity and mortality (Europe, North
America, Japan and others) revealed that sugar intake is a strong risk factor that contributes to higher breast cancer rates,
particularly in older women.
In Europe, the "sugar feeds cancer" concept is so well accepted that oncologists, or cancer doctors, use the Systemic
Cancer Multistep Therapy (SCMT) protocol. Conceived by Manfred von Ardenne in Germany in 1965, SCMT entails
injecting patients with glucose to increase blood-glucose concentrations.

This lowers pH values in cancer tissues via lactic acid formation. In turn, this intensifies the thermal sensitivity of the
malignant tumors and also induces rapid growth of the cancer. Patients are then given whole-body hyperthermia (42 C core
temperature) to further stress the cancer cells, followed by chemotherapy or radiation.

SCMT was tested on 103 patients with metastasized cancer or recurrent primary tumors in a clinical phase-I study at the
Von Ardenne Institute of Applied Medical Research in Dresden, Germany.
Five-year survival rates in SCMT-treated patients increased by 25 to 50 percent, and the complete rate of tumor regression
increased by 30 to 50 percent. The protocol induces rapid growth of the cancer, then treats the tumor with toxic therapies for
a dramatic improvement in outcome.

For metastatic cancer cells, a shift towards growth is facilitated by an evolutionary novel microenvironment within the body,
which is characterized by a permanent availability of high amounts of glucose due to a nutrition with a high glycemic index,
the absence of periods of starvation, as well as reduced physical activity.

Fact #5: Conventional Cancer Treatment Kills More Than It Cures

Why The Cancer Industry Claims This Is a Myth

The medical community insists that surgery is still the most effective treatment we have for cancer. Radiotherapy helps cure
more people than cancer drugs. Yet chemotherapy and other cancer drugs have a very important part to play in cancer
treatment - in some cases helping to cure the disease, and in others helping to prolong survival. Chemotherapy does not
encourage cancer.

The Reality

Doctors and pharmaceutical companies make money from it. That's the only reason chemotherapy is still used. Not because
it's effective, decreases morbidity, mortality or diminishes any specific cancer rates. In fact, it does the opposite.

Related: Cancer Industry Now Admits That Chemo And Radiation Treatments Generate Huge Repeat Business &
Repeat Profits

Chemotherapy boosts cancer growth and long-term mortality rates. Most chemotherapy patients either die or are plagued
with illness within 10-15 years after treatment. It destroys their immune system, increases neuro-cognitive decline, disrupts
endocrine functioning and causes organ and metabolic toxicities. Patients basically live in a permanent state of disease until
their death.

Related: Chemotherapy Backfires - Causes Healthy Cells To Feed Growth Of Cancer Tumours

The reason a 5-year relative survival rate is the standard used to assess mortality rates is due to most cancer patients going
downhill after this period. It's exceptionally bad for business and the cancer industry knows it. They could never show the
public the true 97% statistical failure rate in treating long-term metastatic cancers.
If they did publish the long-term statistics for all cancers administered cytotoxic chemotherapy, that is 10+ years and
produced the objective data on rigorous evaluations including the cost-effectiveness, impact on the immune system, quality
of life, morbidity and mortality, it would be very clear to the world that chemotherapy makes little to no contribution to cancer
survival at all.

No such study has ever been conducted by independent investigators in the history of chemotherapy. The only studies
available come from industry funded institutions and scientists and none of them have ever inclusively quantified the above
variables.

Why? Money, greed and profits run the cancer industry - nothing else.

The cancer establishment must retreat from the truth to treat cancer because there will never be any profit for them in in
eradicating the disease. There is no governing body in the world that protects consumers from being subjected to these
toxic therapies or even known carcinogens in our foods our environment, because that too, will prevent the profits from
rolling in. It's a business of mammoth proportions and must be treated as such.

According to official statistics, one person out of two is claimed to recover from cancer through conventional methods.
Although dramatic, the information nevertheless contains a certain amount of hope, as implicitly it provides something
positive for both scientists and patients.

To the scientists it says: continue the research because it is producing results; do not try preventive, alternative theoretical
or therapeutic roads, nor get discouraged by the fact that patients keep on dying every day. To the patients, on the other
hand, it provides a warning: you have a 50 percent chance of making it, as long as you follow the conventional therapeutic
protocols without trying what they claim are the useless alternatives.
So, in the early stages of tumors (the dubious ones) the recovery rates are extremely high, while in the following stages -
that is, where they certainly are tumors - the rates are barely above zero. The reason for the discrepancy is the qualification
of the data and how a patient is assessed in terms of recovery.

Immune reconstitution and tolerance, organ and metabolic toxicities, endocrine challenges, functional outcomes, quality of
life, and neurocognitive outcomes are NEVER inclusively assessed in any clinical study discussing the long-term survival
and recovery rates of cancer patients.

The damage to these systems slowly develops after chemotherapy, however if often does not begin to manifest throughout
the body until several months or even years have passed. It takes time, but within a 3-5 year period, most chemotherapy
patients begin to have many more symptoms of disease than they every had before their diagnosis, due to and as a direct
result of cytotoxic drug intervention.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is often given to patients who might not really need it at all. Oncologists do not consider the whole
spectrum of chemotherapy risks versus benefits and thus compromise quality of life for every patient they treat.
A study in the Annals of Oncology is one of few which assessed the different potential long-term adverse events associated
with adjuvant chemotherapy in cancer, with a particular focus on long-term cardiac toxicity, secondary leukemia, cognitive
function, and neurotoxicity.

The authors stated that the adverse events are frequently overshadowed by the well-demonstrated clinical efficacy and/or
reassuring short-term safety profiles of the different chemotherapy regimens commonly used today.

Another study in the American Society of Clinical Oncology determined whether long-term survivors of metastatic testicular
cancer have an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity more than 10 years after chemotherapy. They observed a
significantly increased risk for occurrence of cardiac events accompanied by a persisting unfavorable cardiovascular risk
profile likely due to chemotherapeutic agents.

A 12-year meta-analysis published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology observed adults who had developed cancer and
treated with chemotherapy. The 12-year study looked at adults who had developed cancer as an adult. 97% of the time,
chemotherapy did not work in regressing the metastatic cancers.

Resources:

From: SelfExam

It seems that just about all of us have been affected by cancer in some way, either because we have fought a battle with the
disease ourselves or know someone who has (or still is).

Cancer Screening Tests

Alcohol and Increased Breast Cancer Risk Factors

Preventing Skin Cancer

Coping: Feelings and Cancer

Dive In: The Benefits of Swimming for Cancer Survivors

Exercise for Cancer Patients: Fitness After Treatment

 5 Ways Service Dogs Help People with Cancer

Cancer Staging Guide

Cancer Prevention Diet

Hypothyroidism Diet + Natural Treatment

Resolution: Eat Your Way to a Healthy Heart

Related: How You Can Restore Your Health, Enabling Your Body To Self-Repair From Virtually Any Disease Or
Affliction

Related: Breakthrough Cancer Cures Documentary Threatens to Collapse the For-Profit Cancer Industry

Amish Have Lower Rates Of Cancer, Ohio State Study Shows

When Ohio State University cancer researchers first began studying a large sect of Amish living in Ohio, they
theorized they would find higher incidence rates of cancer.

Thats because Amish religious beliefs and traditions limit contact with mainstream society, and intermarriage within this
relatively small population could increase the incidence of cancer-related gene mutations.

Instead, they found just the opposite, said Dr. Judith Westman, division director of Human Genetics at The Ohio State
University Comprehensive Cancer Center Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute
(OSUCCC-James).

The study of Amish suggests that clean living can lead to healthier life. Overall cancer rates in this population were 60
percent of the age-adjusted rate for Ohio and 56 percent of the national rate. The incidence of tobacco-related cancers in
the Amish adults was 37 percent of the rate for Ohio adults, and the incidence of non-tobacco-related cancer was 72
percent.

"The Amish are at an increased risk for a number of genetic disorders but they probably have protection against
many types of cancer both through their lifestyle there is very little tobacco or alcohol use and limited sexual
partners and through genes that may reduce their susceptibility to cancer, said Westman, who co-authored the
study with OSUCCC-James researcher Amy K. Ferketich, who specializes in epidemiology.

The findings were reported in a recent issue of the journal Cancer Causes & Control. The study, which spanned 1996-2003
and is the first of its kind, looked at the incidence of 24 types of cancer in the Amish population. Of the 24 types of cancer
studied, the incidence of seven of them cervical, laryngeal, lung, oral cavity/pharyngeal, melanoma, breast and prostate
was low enough compared with the Ohio rate to be statistically significant.

Westman and Ferketich chose to study the Amish to gain a better understanding of the contributions of environment and
genetics to developing cancer. Ohio is home to the largest Amish population in the world, and of the approximately 26,000
Amish living in Holmes County, all descended from the same 100 people who immigrated here 200 years ago.
Researchers interviewed 92 Amish families as part of a cross-sectional household survey and charted their family cancer
histories obtaining cancer information on all relatives back three generations and as far forward as possible. For example,
researchers interviewing a set of grandparents could gather cancer information on both their ancestors and descendants,
said Ferketich.

The study population consisted of 9,992 Amish adults residing in the Holmes County area. Researchers also collected death
certificates and cross-checked cancer cases reported to the Ohio Cancer Incidence and Surveillance System. Between
1996 and 2003, there were 191 incident cancer cases identified.

Because this is a small, relatively closed population, we needed to interview just 92 families to cover 90 percent of
the population in Holmes County, said Ferketich.

The low cancer incidence in the Ohio Amish may be partially explained by lifestyle factors such as limited tobacco
consumption and lack of sexual promiscuity. The Amish, as a whole, consume very little tobacco and alcohol, and they lead
active, labor-intensive lives as farmers, construction laborers and factory workers.
 "One of the things we can learn from the Amish is that they dont typically smoke or use tobacco
products, Westman said.

They have limited sexual partners and monogamous relationships, so they dont have some of the cancers that
are related to sexual promiscuity.

Even skin cancer rates are lower for Amish, despite the fact though many Amish make their living working outdoors where
they are exposed to sunlight and UV rays.

"They are typically covered and dress to work in the sun the way that is recommended by wearing wide-brimmed
hats and generally wearing long sleeves to protect their arms, Westman said.

Other Ohio State researchers involved in the study include Steven N. MacEachern, J.R. Wilkins III, Robert T. Pilarski,
Rebecca Nagy, Stanley Lemeshow, Albert de la Chapelle and Clara D. Bloomfield. The study was funded by the Ohio
Division of the American Cancer Society, National Institutes of Health and the Leukemia Clinical Research Foundation.

The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center- Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove
Research Institute is one of only 40 Comprehensive Cancer Centers in the United States designated by the National Cancer
Institute.

Ranked by U.S. News & World Report among the top 20 cancer hospitals in the nation, The James (www.jamesline.com) is
the 180-bed adult patient-care component of the cancer program at The Ohio State University. The OSUCCC-James is one
of only five centers in the country approved by the NCI to conduct both Phase I and Phase II clinical trials.
Are All Vitamins Safe?
April 3 2016 | From: TheDoctorWithin

After you have finished reading this article, you will know more about vitamins than 95% of
clinical nutritionists, doctors, supplement sales force, or bodybuilders.

Natural Whole Food Vitamins: Ascorbic Acid Is Not Vitamin C

If that sounds arrogant or overstated, it really isnt my fault. Im just a messenger; a purveyor of information. Either Im
right or the 95% are right; cant be both.

Related: How You Can Restore Your Health, Enabling Your Body To Self-Repair From Virtually Any Disease Or Affliction

Without further ado, heres the kernel: ascorbic acid is not vitamin C. Alpha tocopherol is not vitamin E. Retinoic acid is not vitamin
A. And so on through the other vitamins. Vast sums of money have been expended to make these myths part of Conventional
Wisdom. If you have several college degrees and all this is news to you, dont feel bad. Unless you think your education ended at
Commencement. Which is generally true.

Wheels Within Wheels

Vitamins are not individual molecular compounds. Vitamins are biological complexes. They are multi-step biochemical interactions
whose action is dependent upon a number of variables within the biological terrain. Vitamin activity only takes place when all
conditions are met within that environment, and when all co-factors and components of the entire vitamin complex are present and
working together.
Vitamin activity is even more than the sum of all those parts; it also involves timing.

Vitamins cannot be isolated from their complexes and still perform their specific life functions within the cells. When isolated into
artificial commercial forms, like ascorbic acid, these purified synthetics act as drugs in the body. They are no longer vitamins, and to
call them such is inaccurate.

A vitamin is:

A working process consisting of the nutrient, enzymes, coenzymes, antioxidants, and trace minerals activators.

- Royal Lee What Is a Vitamin? Applied Trophology Aug 1956

Forgotten Trailblazer

Dr. Royal Lee was the pioneer researcher in the field of whole food vitamins. For decades he documented the basic facts
summarized in this chapter. His work has never been scientifically refuted. Anyone who seriously undertakes the study of vitamins
today corroborates Lees work. His story is a fascinating study in itself, a study of indomitable perseverance in the pursuit of true
principles. Jensen tells us that Royal Lees work will not be appreciated until the next century.

Hasnt happened yet.

Lee felt the full weight of organized drugs/medicine bearing down on him. Reading like something out of Schindlers List, we learn
that the FDA not only persecuted Lee for challenging the economics of synthetic vitamins, produced by giant drug companies, but
that he was actually ordered by a court to burn all his research of the past 20 years! Burn his research! When has that ever
happened in this country? They didnt even do that to Larry Flynt.

Going off on a tangent, ever wondered how the FDA attained its present position as attack dog for the drug companies and food
manufacturers? Its another whole story in itself. The precursor of the FDA was the Bureau of Chemistry. Up until 1912 the Bureau of
Chemistry was headed up by a man named Dr. Harvey W. Wiley. Heres a quote from Dr. Wiley that illustrates where his interests
lay:

No food product in our country would have any trace of benzoic acid, sulfurous acid or sulfites or any alum or
saccharin, save for medical purposes. No soft drink would contain caffeine or theobromine. No bleached flour
would enter interstate commerce.

Our foods and drugs would be wholly without any form of adulteration and misbranding. The health of our people
would be vastly improved and the life greatly extended.
 The manufacturers of our food supply, and especially the millers, would devote their energies to improving the
public health and promoting happiness in every home by the production of whole ground, unbolted cereal flours
and meals.

The History of a Crime Against the Pure Food Law, 1912

Now obviously we cant have a dangerous lunatic like this in charge of the public nutrition, can we? Dr. Wiley actually filed suit
against the Coca-Cola company in an attempt to keep their artificial product out of interstate commerce, and off the market.

Fortunately Wiley was eventually replaced by a saner individual, more attuned to the real nutritional needs of the American people,
as determined by the experts who knew what was best for us: the food manufacturers. This was Dr. Elmer Nelson, and in his words
we get an idea of the change in philosophy that marked the transformation of the Bureau of Chemistry into the FDA:

It is wholly unscientific to state that a well-fed body is more able to resist disease than a poorly-fed body. My
overall opinion is that there hasnt been enough experimentation to prove that dietary deficiencies make one
susceptible to disease.

- Elmer Nelson MD, Washington Post 26 Oct 49

Bernard Jensen illustrates how the tobacco industry and the food giants like Coke were indirectly behind the legal persecution of
Royal Lee. Cigarette ads in the 40s and 50s showed medical doctors promoting the digestive benefits of smoking Camels. Or the
advertising of Coke and other refined sugar foods stating that science has shown how sugar can help keep your appetite and
weight under control. (Empty Harvest)
During this same period, Royal Lee was kept in courts for years, fighting to keep the right to advertise his vitamin products, because
he was a threat to the food manufacturers. Lee knew they were poisoning the American public. He proved that refined sugars and
devitalized, bleached flours were destroying the arteries and the digestive system, causing heart disease and cancer.

Whole versus Fractionated

OK, natural vs. synthetic. Lets start with Vitamin C. Most sources equate vitamin C with ascorbic acid, as though they were the
same thing. Theyre not. Ascorbic acid is an isolate, a fraction, a distillate of naturally occurring vitamin C. In addition to ascorbic
acid, vitamin C must include rutin, bioflavonoids, Factor K, Factor J, Factor P, Tyrosinase, Ascorbinogen, and other components as
shown below:
 Ascorbic Acid

Ascorbinogen
Bioflavonoids
Rutin

Tyrosinase

Factor J
Factor K
Factor P

Vitamin C

In addition, mineral co-factors must be available in proper amounts.

If any of these parts are missing, there is no vitamin C, no vitamin activity. When some of them are present, the body will draw on its
own stores to make up the differences, so that the whole vitamin may be present. Only then will vitamin activity take place, provided
that all other conditions and co-factors are present.

Ascorbic acid is described merely as the antioxidant wrapper portion of vitamin C; ascorbic acid protects the functional parts of the
vitamin from rapid oxidation or breakdown. (Somer p 58 Vitamin C: A Lesson in Keeping An Open Mind The Nutrition Report)

Over 90% of ascorbic acid in the US is manufactured at a facility in Nutley, New Jersey, owned by Hoffman-LaRoche, one of the
worlds biggest drug manufacturers. Here ascorbic acid is made from a process involving cornstarch and volatile acids.

Most U.S. vitamin companies then buy the bulk ascorbic acid from this single facility. After that, marketing takes over. Each
company makes its own labels, its own claims, and its own formulations, each one claiming to have the superior form of vitamin C,
even though it all came from the same place, and its really not vitamin C at all.

FRACTIONATED = SYNTHETIC = CRYSTALLINE = FAKE

The word synthetic means two things:

Man made

Occurs nowhere in nature

From the outset, it is crucial to understand the difference between vitamins and vitamin activity. The vitamin is the biochemical
complex. Vitamin activity means the actual biological and cellular changes that take place when the stage is set for the vitamin
complex to act.

Think of it like gas and a car. Pumping the gas into the tank doesnt necessarily mean the car is going anywhere. Other conditions
and factors must be also present, in order for Activity to occur.

The gas line to the carburetor must be clear, the carburetor jets must be set, there must be an exact mixture of air flow, the ignition
must be turned on, the spark plugs must be clean, the exact amount of gas must reach each spark plug right before it fires, no gas
must be left over in the cylinder after the plug fires. Getting the idea? If any of this stuff is missing, theres no Activity: the car doesnt
run, or at least not very well.
Amazing as it may sound if youre hearing this for the first time, vitamins are more than the synthetic fractions we are commonly
taught they are. The ascorbic acid you buy at the grocery store every few weeks, thinking you are buying Vitamin C, is just a
chemical copy of naturally occurring ascorbic acid, which itself is still only a fraction of the actual Vitamin C.

Real vitamin C is part of something living, and as such, can impart life. Your synthetic, fractionated chemical ascorbic acid never
grew in the ground, never saw the light of day, never was alive or part of anything alive. Its a chemical, a cornstarch derivative, a
sulfuric acid by-product. In your body its just another drug. Synthetic vitamins have toxic effects from mega-doses and actually can
increase the white blood cell count.

Vitamins are only necessary in minute quantities on a daily basis. Whole food vitamins, by contrast, are not toxic since the vitamin is
complexed in its integral working form, and requires nothing from the body, and triggers no immune response.

Deficiency

Scurvy is a disease caused by vitamin C deficiency. Scurvy is characterized by bleeding gums, slow wound healing, softening
bones, loose teeth, ulcerations of the mouth and digestive tract, general weight loss and fatigue. From 1650 to 1850 half of all
seamen on transoceanic voyages died of scurvy.

It was discovered by ship surgeon Thomas Lind in the early 1800s that British sailors were spared the disease altogether simply by
a diet rich in citrus fruits. Since limes travelled well, they were the common choice during the early years, and thus the expression
limeys was coined to describe British sailors. It was later found both at sea and in prison fare that potatoes were equally successful
in preventing scurvy, and much cheaper to obtain. (Lancet. 1842)
We find that there is less than 20 mg of ascorbic acid in a potato. Yet this small amount, since it is complexed in a food source, is all
the body needs not only to prevent scurvy, but also to cure it, even in its advanced state. Such a remedy is described in detail in
Richard Danas amazing journal Two Years Before the Mast, written in 1840.

Whole food vitamin C as found in potatoes, onions, and citrus fruits is able to quickly cure any case of scurvy. By contrast, the
fractionated chemical ascorbic acid has been shown to be insufficient in resolving a scurvy condition, simply because it does not act
as a nutrient. (Lancet 1842)
Ascorbic acid simply cannot confer vitamin activity, as taught by the discoverer of vitamin C himself, another Nobel Prize laureate,
Dr. Albert Szent-Georgi.

Szent-Georgi discovered vitamin C in 1937. In all his research however, Szent-Georgi found that he could never cure scurvy with the
isolated ascorbic acid itself. Realizing that he could always cure scurvy with the impure vitamin C found in simple foods, Szent-
Georgi discovered that other factors had to be at work in order for vitamin activity to take place.

So he returned to the laboratory and eventually made the discovery of another member of the vitamin C complex, as shown above:
rutin. All the factors in the complex, as Royal Lee and Dr. Szent-Georgi both came to understand, ascorbic acid, rutin, and the other
factors, were synergists: co-factors which together sparked the functional interdependence of biologically related nutrient factors.
(Empty Harvest p120)

The term wheels within wheels was used to describe the interplay of co-factors.

Each of the other synergists in the C complex has a separate function:

P factors for blood vessel strength,

J factors for oxygen-carrying capacity of red cells,

Ttyrosinase as an essential enzyme for enhancing white blood cell effectiveness.

Ascorbic acid is just the antioxidant outer shell the protector of all these other synergists so that they will be able to perform their
individual functions.

Now I can hear you asking, what about Linus Pauling, double Nobel Prize laureate, and his lifetime espousal of megadosing on
ascorbic acid up to 10 grams per day. He lived to be 93. Are we saying that he took a synthetic vitamin all that time?

Yes, thats exactly right. Bernard Jensen suggests that ascorbic acid has an acidifying effect in part of the digestive tract, making an
unfriendly environment for viruses, Candida, and pathogenic bacteria.
Paulings good health was not the result of synthetic vitamin activity. Good genetics and maintaining an internal bioterrain not
conducive to inflammation are likely what brought longevity to Linus Pauling. He eventually died of cancer at 93, but then who wants
to live forever?

Dr. Royal Lees phrase biological wheels within wheels always comes up in any discussion of whole food vitamins. Essentially it
means that individual synergists cannot function as a vitamin in a chemically isolated form, like ascorbic acid.

Vitamins are living complexes which contribute to other higher living complexes like cell repair, collagen manufacture, and
maintenance of blood circulation.

Ascorbic acid is not a living complex. It is a copy of a part of a living complex known as vitamin C. Ascorbic acid is a fractionated,
crystalline isolate of vitamin C.

Why are you a high school graduate or a college graduate or a doctor, and you dont know this? Because drug manufacturers like
things clean and simple and cheap to produce. To this simple fact add the politics which always comes into play when anyone
mentions the word billions, and you are beginning to get the idea about where to begin your investigation. Burned his research?

Dietary Sources

Most vitamins cannot be made by the body. They must be taken in as food. The best sources then are obviously whole foods, rich in
vitamins. Because of soil depletion, mineral depletion, pesticides, air pollution, and erosion, it is common knowledge that foods
grown in American soil today have only a fraction of the nutrient value of 50 years ago.

That means a fraction of the vitamins and minerals necessary for normal human cell function. Royal Lee described the American
diet as the cultivation and production of devitalized foods. Dr. Weston Price describes these empty products as the foods of
commerce. Think its gotten better or worse since their time? Thus the necessity for supplementation.
Vitamins and minerals are not functionally separable. They make each other work. Example: vitamin D is necessary for the body to
absorb calcium. Copper is necessary for vitamin C activity. And so on. Mineral deficiencies can cause vitamin deficiencies, and vice
versa. Epidemic mineral deficiency in America is a well-documented result of systematic soil depletion. (See Minerals chapter:
thedoctorwithin.com)

So that is the other prime difference between whole food vitamins and synthetics: whole food vitamins contain within them many
essential trace minerals necessary for their synergistic operation. Synthetic vitamins contain no trace minerals, relying on, and
depleting, the bodys own mineral reserves.

Funny Farms

Following the German agricultural methods of Von Leibig in the mid-1800s, American farmers found that NPK (nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium) was all that was necessary for crops to look good. (Frost p7) As long as NPK is added to the soil, crops
can be produced and sold year after year from the same soil.

They look OK. But the trace minerals vital for human nutrition are virtually absent from most American soil after all these years.

Many of these minerals, such as zinc, copper, and magnesium, are necessary co-factors of vitamin activity.

Depleted topsoil is one simple, widespread mechanism of both vitamin and mineral deficiency in produce today.

This doesnt even take into account the tons of poisonous herbicides and pesticides dumped on crops. According to the UN, two
million tons of pesticides are used worldwide annually. (Jensen, p69)
Agri-business has one motive: Profit.

Such a focus has resulted in an output of empty produce and a nation of unhealthy people. The earths immune system is its soil. To
be vital and capable of growing vital foods, soil must be rich in both minerals and soil-based organisms life forms.

Healthy produce naturally resists insects. Insects are like bad bacteria in the body: They are attracted to diseased tissue,
though they do not cause it.

The Foods of Commerce

And were still only talking about people who actually eat raw fruits and vegetables, which is a minority. Processed food composes
the majority of what most Americans eat. The only nutrients in most processed foods are enriched and fortified as described
below.
When a doctor says that food supplements are all unnecessary because we can get everything we need from our food, that doctor is
lacking basic information published and agreed upon by his own peers. Whether or not we need supplementation is no longer an
issue, except for one who is totally out of touch. The issue is what kind and how much.

Vitamin and mineral deficiency can be tagged to practically ANY disease syndrome known to man.

DW Cavanaugh, MD of Cornell University actually concluded that:

There is only one major disease, and that is malnutrition.

(Jensen, p8)

Malnutrition of the affluent is the natural result of the foods of commerce.

Websurfing

The best vitamins are called whole food vitamins.

It will be difficult finding this out on the Internet, however, because the Web is dominated by mainstream nutritional theory, which
means pharmaceutical underwriting.

In the area of vitamins, the Internet is 99% marketing; 1% actual information.

But then again, this isnt Mission Difficult. This is Mission Impossible, Mr Hunt.

There are about 110 companies who sell vitamins in the US. Less than 5 of them use whole food vitamins. The reason is simple:
whole food vitamins are expensive to make.
A few of the largest pharmaceutical firms in the world mass produce synthetic vitamins for the vast majority of these 110 vitamin
companies, who then put their own label on them, and every company claims theirs is the best! Its ridiculous! Americans spend over
$9 billion per year for synthetic vitamins. (Frost p2)

Whole food vitamins are obtained by taking a vitamin-rich plant, removing the water and the fiber in a cold vacuum process, free of
chemicals, and then packaging for stability. The entire vitamin complex in this way can be captured intact, retaining its functional
and nutritional integrity. (DeCava p.23.) Upon ingestion, the body is not required to draw on its own reserves in order to complete
any missing elements from the vitamin complex.

Mainstre
am marketing of vitamins and minerals has successfully created the myth that vitamins and minerals may be isolated from each
other, that correct amounts may be measured out, and then we can derive total benefit from taking these fractionated chemical
creations. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

Vitamins and minerals, and also enzymes, work closely together as co-factors for each others efficacy. If one part is missing, or in
the wrong form or the wrong amount, entire chains of metabolic processes will not proceed normally. Result: downward spiralling of
health, probably imperceptible for long periods of time.

Marketing and Promotion

What is the marketing philosophy behind the prevalence of the type of synthetic vitamins available in the supermarket and mall
vitamin stores? Simple: profit above all else. Once the public is shown that vitamin supplementation is necessary, the rest is
marketing.

Marketing is the art of persuading by suspending logic and twisting data into junk science. Example: whats the actual difference in
composition between Wheaties and Total, two cereals put out by the same company? Total is advertised as being much more
nutrient-rich than ordinary Wheaties. Look at the labels. What justifies the extra $1.30 for a box of Total? Answer: 1.5 worth of
synthetic vitamins sprayed over the Wheaties.
Thats it! Thats what vitamin enriched always means. The other trick word is fortified. Generally that means that the food itself is
devoid of nutrients or enzymes, so they tried to pump it up a little with some vitamins.

Cheap synthetic vitamin sprays are all that is required for the manufacturer to use labels like enriched and fortified. These words
are red flags if a food needs to be fortified or enriched, you can bet it was already dead.

The mega-vitamin theory doesnt really hold when it comes to synthetics: If A Little Is Good, More Is Better. Macro doses of vitamin
E, and also vitamin D have been shown to decrease immune function significantly. (DeCava) It stands to reason. Vitamins by
definition are necessary in phenomenally small doses. The discoverer of thiamine, a B vitamin, and the man who came up with the
word vitamin, Dr. Casimir Funk, has this to say about synthetics:

Synthetic vitamins: these are highly inferior to vitamins from natural sources, also the synthetic product is well
known to be far more toxic.

Nutrition authority DeCava describes it:

Natural food-source vitamins are enzymatically alive. Man-made synthetic vitamins are dead chemicals.

The Real Truth About Vitamins p 209

Oxymorons: military intelligence, rap music, synthetic vitamins.

The marketing of fractionated crystalline synthetic vitamins has been so successful that most nutritionists and doctors are unaware
that there is something missing from these vitamins. Vitamin manufacturers compete for customers with identical products they
all bought their synthetic vitamins from the same couple of drug companies.
To differentiate their product, each makes claims of high potency. Our vitamins are higher potency than theirs, etc. The point is, the
higher the potency, the more the druglike effects are present. Natural whole food vitamins are very low potency.

Remember the 20mg of vitamin C in a potato that was able to cure a patient of scurvy? That was low potency. Low potency is all we
need. Low potency is enough to bring about vitamin activity. High potency overshoots the mark the chemical is very pure and
refined, like the difference between white sugar and the type of sugar thats in an apple.

The Milligram Game

Generally speaking, if milligrams are being discussed at length, the author has no clue about vitamins. Synthetic vitamins are
refined, high potency chemicals, and therefore may be accurately measured in milligrams, just like drugs.

This has nothing to do with vitamin activity or nutrition, except in a negative way.

Half the Story

The same type of incomplete action can be seen with any synthetic vitamin. Lets take beta carotene for a minute, which the body
can turn into vitamin A.

Now youll remember that vitamin A is necessary for good eyesight, DNA synthesis, and protects cells from free radicals. A study
reported in Apr 94 in the NEJM of some 30,000 Finnish subjects showed conclusively that synthetic vitamin A had no antioxidant
effect whatsoever.

A true antioxidant helps to protect heart muscle, lungs, and artery surfaces from breaking down prematurely. In this study, the
subjects who received the synthetic beta carotene actually had an 8% higher incidence of fatal heart attacks, strokes, and lung
cancer than those who got the placebo (sugar pill).
Stands to reason: the synthetic brought no vitamin activity to the tissues that needed it. As a dead, purified chemical introduced into
the body, the synthetic further stressed the immune system, the liver, and the kidneys which all had to try to break down this odd
chemical and remove it from the body. It would be bad enough if they were harmless, but synthetic vitamins actually have a net
negative effect.

Vitamin A

Vitamin A was first discovered in 1919. By 1924, it had been broken down and separated from its natural whole food complex:
purified.
By 1931, LaRoche one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world, even today had succeeded in synthesizing
vitamin A. That means they had created a purely chemical copy of a fraction of naturally occurring vitamin A.

Naturally occurring vitamin A is found associated with an entire group of other components:

Retinols
Retinoids
Retinal
Carotenoids
Carotenes
Fatty acids
Vitamin C
Vitamin E
Vitamin B
Vitamin D
Enzymes
Minerals

- Vitamins and Minerals Somer 1992

Isolated from these other factors, vitamin A is a fraction which cannot perform its biological functions. Taken as a synthetic, it must
then draw on this list of resources already in the body in order to complete its make-up. Whole food vitamin A, by contrast, is already
complete and ready to go.

Most synthetic vitamin A consists only of retinal, retinol, or retinoic acid. The well-publicized potential for toxicity with mega doses of
vitamin A involves one of these three.

Vitamin A toxicity, known as hypervitaminosis, always results from an excess of synthetic, purified vitamin A, and never from whole
food vitamin A. (DeCava, p 86)

Effects of vitamin A toxicity include:

Tumor enhancement

Joint disorders

Osteoporosis

Extreme dryness of eyes, mouth and skin

Enlargement of liver and spleen

Immune depression

Birth defects

Beta Carotene

Beta Carotene is a precursor the body can convert to vitamin A. Unfortunately, as a supplement, synthetic beta carotene is usually
stabilized in refined vegetable oils. In this trans fatty acid form, oxidation occurs and the chemically pure beta carotene can no
longer act as a nutrient, because it was changed. Almost all synthetic beta carotene is produced by the Swiss drug giant Hoffman-
LaRoche. This form can no longer be converted to vitamin A. The best it can be is worthless, and the worst is toxic.

Natural vitamin A and beta carotene are well known as immune boosters and cancer fighters, in their role as antioxidants. Synthetic
vitamin A by contrast has actually brought about significant increases in cancer. The same Finnish study we saw above provided
smokers with large doses of synthetic beta carotene. Lung cancer incidence increased 18%! (NEJM Apr 94 The Alpha Tocopherol
Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group)
These findings were corroborated two years later in another study written up in Lancet. Pharmacologic doses of synthetic beta
carotenes were found to block the antioxidant activity of the other 50 naturally occurring carotenoids in the diet. Anti-cancer activity
was thus blocked by the synthetic. (Lancet 1996)

With the vast outpouring of wrong information about vitamins A and C, the findings of a 1991 article in Health Counselor are no
surprise: 50% of Americans are deficient in vitamin A and 41% are deficient in vitamin C.

Synthetic vitamins cannot prevent deficiencies.

Fake Vitamin B

In one experiment, synthetic vitamin B (thiamine) was shown to render 100% of a group of pigs sterile! 100% would be considered a
significant finding. (Dr. Barnett Sure, Journ Natr 1939) Perhaps the fact that synthetic vitamin B comes from coal tar, maybe that has
something to do with it, you think? Then theres vitamin B12, which comes from activated sewage sludge. (Frost p 60)
Been shooting blanks since you started on those multis?

For the licensed dieticians and clinical nutritionists reading this in disbelief because it is too unscientific, consider the way Theron
Randolph MD delineated between natural and synthetic:

A synthetically derived substance may cause a reaction in a chemically susceptible person when the same
material of natural origin is tolerated, despite the two substances having identical chemical structures.

The point is illustrated by the frequency of clinical reactions to synthetic vitamins especially vitamin B1 and C
when the [same] naturally occurring vitamins are tolerated.

Always keep this idea in mind when confronted with the marketing hook bio-identical.

Irradiation

According to Los Angeles naturopath, Dr. Jack Singh, all commercial lecithins in supplements, as well as most vitamin D, comes
from irradiated vegetable oils. Thats rancid, oxidizing trans fatty acids! A birthday party of free radicals.
This is the precise mechanism for arterial wall breakdown prior to plaque deposits, then arteriosclerosis, then heart disease. I
thought we were supposed to be taking vitamins to stay healthy!

Lost Horizon

Why is this information so difficult to find? Its in none of the alternative health zines, or any of the mainstream media. Alternative-
Lite guru Julian Whittaker, in his summer 1998 newsletter actually had the temerity to state outright Synthetic vitamins and whole
food vitamins are identical.

Im sure his synthetic vitamin company and all its retailers were reassured by this incredibly arrogant and flagrantly inaccurate
pronouncement. But who is objecting? Only those clients of the 5 companies who know enough to take whole food vitamins,
because they have become educated to realize the difference. These are the vast minority, having no control of the media.

Royal Lee and Harvey Wiley lost. Nobody knows who they are today, except we few. This is no accident. What everybody does
know is Pepsi and Viagra and Wonder Bread and prednisone and Double Whoppers with Cheese and Zantac and Baskin-Robbins
and Longs Drug Store. And grocery store vitamins: synthetic vitamins.
Thats the world, today as the product of yesterday. Control of information today is one of the most sophisticated systems of
influence ever devised. The simple ideas contained in this chapter are simply not available to the mass consciousness. The
documentation is out there, but you really gotta dig.

100 years ago if a medical doctor saw a case of cancer he would call all his colleagues to come and have a look, telling them it was
unlikely they would see another case, as cancer was so rare. People rarely died of heart attacks; in fact the term heart attack itself
didnt even exist. There was no incidence at all of atherosclerosis. Diabetes was practically unheard of.

What did they eat? Fruits, vegetables, meat, butter, and lard. But none of it was processed with drugs and chemicals.

Today one in three dies of cancer. One in two dies of heart disease. Diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death in the U.S. (Vital
Statistics) For anyone born after 2003, there is a one in 3 chance of Type 2 diabetes. Is that progress?

If you are a food manufacturer it is, and especially if you are a drug manufacturer. In 2007 the WHO ranked the US as #39 in the
world in infant mortality. Male sperm count is less than 20% of what it was in 1929. (1981 University of Florida report, Natural vs.
Synthetic) Infant mortality is up; birth defects are up.

We spend $1.5 trillion per year for health care, most of which goes for administration and executive salaries. Who are the largest
advertisers for TV and the printed media?
Right: drug companies and food manufacturers.

Do they want to keep the ball rolling? You bet. Will they kill you to do it?

You bet. Do they want people to take charge of their own health by natural inexpensive foods and supplements?

Negative.

A cure for cancer has been right around the corner since Nixon.

People are starting to ask questions; theyre less inclined to believe the slick ads coming every 10 minutes on TV and in
Newsweek.

Perhaps Hippocrates did not envision doctors as detail men or drug reps. He most likely thought like Henry Bieler, MD:

Nature, if given the opportunity is always the greatest healer. It is the physicians role to assist in this healing, to
play a supporting role.

Finding the Right Cure for You

So what do you do? Well, you may now have some insight that your vitamin needs are not being met by the Walgreens generics.
Wallach used to talk about expensive urine from these unmetabolized grocery store synthetic placebos.

The water soluble vitamins are best obtained through organic produce grown in mineral-rich soil. The best supplements in this
category are the top-shelf green foods, like David Sandovals Best of Greens, and its equivalents.
The fat soluble vitamins, A, E, and D are best obtained through fish, raw dairy, avocado, raw nuts, raw coconut, and clean meats.
High end supplements like Udos Choice, MOR, and Nordic Naturals can round out your EFA requirements

Beyond this its MLM marketing roulette, and if you cant spot the mark in the first 5 minutes, baby, its you.

Related: That Vitamin Movie

Dr. Kelly Brogan's Takedown Of Big Pharma's SSRI Anti-Depressant Drug Lies Hits
Bestseller Lists
April 2 2016 | From: NaturalNews

Pharma-controlled press desperately tried to censor this book, but failed. Just like Del Bigtree
made a dangerous film called "VAXXED," Dr. Kelly Brogan wrote a dangerous book.
How dangerous? So dangerous that the prescription drug cartel in America -- you know, Big Pharma -- ordered
media outlets like The New York Times and The Washington Post to blackball the book in the hope that no one
would read it.

Natural News has learned that all the major media outlets obediently agreed to censor the book and its author. No reviews -
not even negative ones - would be published.

No interviews with the author, no TV appearances, no debates, nothing. A literal conspiracy against a book was hatched in
secret and militantly followed by the entire media.

The book is called "A Mind of Your Own," and if you're wondering what's so dangerous about it, the book totally
exposes the science FRAUD of Big Pharma's antidepressant drugs. It empowers readers with knowledge they can
use to take back their mental health using food, nutrition and natural therapies that don't earn huge profits for the
drug company cartels.

Related: Social media could aggravate depression

The author, Dr. Kelly Brogan, is giving away the first chapter of the book for free on her website. Click this link to go there
now and download the first chapter, and you'll find out just how "dangerous" this book really is. (Hint: It threatens a $10+
billion drug industry that preys upon the mental health of citizens while keeping them all sick or addicted...)
 Exploding in Popularity Across Independent
Media, Bypassing the Corrupt, Pharma - Controlled
Mainstream Media

Now, thanks to the efforts of independent media websites like

GreenMedInfo.com, the book has become Amazon's #1 best
seller in the "Depression" category and has also achieved a
#1 best seller ranking in the category of "Holistic Medicine."

As GreenMedInfo now reports, "Since then, A Mind Of Your

Own soared to #20 in Amazon's 8.8 million title inventory,
selling out within only two days of its March 15th launch date.

Then, yesterday, it broke through all three of the top bestselling

book lists: USA Today, Publishers Weekly, and #10 on the
prestigious NY Times bestsellers list's most hard to crack
category: Advice, How-To, Misc."

In other words, the very same book that the NY Times and USA
Today desperately tried to silence has now broken through the
censorship and achieved statistical rankings on their own
bestseller lists. (Question: Will the NY Times deny the book its
proper ranking and blackball it from the NY Times Bestseller
list? They've done it before...)

These are all the same media outlets, by the way, that just
recently heavily pressured Robert De Niro to censor the
"VAXXED" documentary by pulling it from the Tribeca Film
Festival.

He reluctantly complied with the demands of the media science trolls and vaccine totalitarians, memory holing the
documentary and making sure no one gets a chance to see it at the festival.

Media Censorship in Full Force Against Truth: Psych Drugs, Vaccines, GMOs - You Name it!

On all these topics - psychiatric drugs, vaccines and GMOs - the entire mainstream media operates as a pharma mafia
censorship goon squad. The media is, of course, funded largely by Big Pharma and biotech agricultural giants like ADM,
DuPont and Monsanto. Because so much money flows into the mainstream media from these corporate giants, the
corporations literally write the marching order memos for media to follow.

When these corporate giants order the media to censor a book, they censor a book. When they are ordered to attack Robert
De Niro, they attack Robert De Niro. And when they order the media to silence Dr. Kelly Brogan and try to make her book a
total failure, they follow those orders with absolute obedience (combined with a total disregard for the truth on any of these
matters).

The Mainstream Media Actively Plots Against you, Seeking to Deny you Access to Transformative
Knowledge
Yet more and more citizens all around the world are waking up and realizing that the mainstream media actively plots
against you learning anything that's true about psychiatric drugs, vaccines and GMOs. Vindictive, treacherous, truth-
hating rags like Forbes.com specialize in spreading corporate disinfo while pursuing a quasi-journalistic agenda of defaming,
slandering and discrediting all who speak out against the holy trinity of poison and death: Big Pharma, Big Biotech and Big
Vaccine.

Today we just learned that The Associated Press actively collaborated with the Nazi regime to crush freedom of the press so
that AP would get exclusive stories from Adolf Hitler. Also, earlier this week we discovered that a German journalist went
public, admitting that everything in the mainstream media is totally FAKED, saying, "We all lie for the CIA."

Dr. Kelly Brogan likely had no idea how all this worked until she authored her own book. Operating under the belief that the
mainstream media was actually interested in sharing information that would help empower and uplift readers, Dr. Brogan was
absolutely shocked to discover that her book -- and her message -- was being systematically silenced and censored by
the media.

So just like the VAXXED film -- which is now playing in a New York theater beginning this Friday -- Dr. Kelly Brogan
has bypassed the censorship of the controlled mainstream media and found success through the health activism
community.

Click here to get chapter one of her book for FREE right now.

Watch my full video on censored SCIENCE books here which covers this book and several others that have been
systematically censored by the pharma-controlled establishment:

Click here to get the book on Amazon.com. Or get it at Barnes & Noble at this link.

The Food Industrial Complex

March 30 2016 | From: Priceonomics

In 2011, during a debate over the nutritional guidelines for school lunches, Congress decided that
pizza counts as a vegetable. And not for the first time.
The American government first proposed that an unhealthy food - if it contains trace amounts of a healthy
ingredient - could count as a vegetable in 1981. Looking for ways to cut the school lunch budget, the Reagan
Administration suggested that cafeterias include ingredients in condiments like pickle relish and ketchup toward
nutritional requirements.

This was not good politics. Democrats and the press had a field day saying that Reagan had just classified ketchup as a
vegetable.

"This is one of the most ridiculous regulations I ever heard of, Democratic Senator John Heinz, owner of
Heinz, told the press, and I suppose I need not add that I know something about ketchup and relish."
The Reagan Administration dropped the proposal, but it soon became law anyway. When the Obama Administration
directed the Department of Agriculture to revise school lunch policies in 2011, experts took aim at the rule that allowed the
tiny amount of tomato paste in pizza sauce to count toward the vegetable requirements of each meal .

Any changes made by the Department of Agriculture could jeopardize huge contracts for companies that supply food for
school childrens lunches, so the food industry responded with a $5.6 million lobbying campaign.

According to Margo Wootan, director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, two multibillion dollar companies spent
the most: Schwan and ConAgra, which each had large contracts for pizzas and fries used in school lunches.

Before the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) could make any recommendations, Congress ensured that the push for
healthier lunches did not hurt the manufacturers of unhealthy foods. Congress passed an agriculture appropriations bill that
would deny the USDA funding to enforce any policies that prevented the potatoes in french fries or the tomato paste in pizza
from counting as nutritional elements.
The press again enjoyed declaring that Congress had classified pizza as a vegetable.

Cynics shrugged at yet another example of the government prioritizing the bottom line of businesses that manufacture
sugary and salty processed foods over public health.

Yet the one-sided nature of the food industrys lobbying is puzzling. Where were the broccoli, spinach, and carrot lobbies?

Why didnt a member of Congress take to the floor with a set of talking points provided by the leafy green vegetable lobby?
Why cant American farmers, who enjoy huge government subsidies, stand up to the processed food lobby?

Part of the answer lies in the economics of the food industry: the profit margins and scale of processed food makers gives
them a heft that growers of healthy foods cant match.
But it is also because Big Ag is not in the healthy food business. American farms with lobbying power dont grow brussel
sprouts; they grow grains used to make the high fructose corn syrup in Coke, the starches in processed foods, and the oil in
deep fryers.

This is somewhat inevitable, but it is also a self-inflicted wound: the result of misguided government policy that subsidizes
Big Macs and Big Gulps.

The Poor Margins of Broccoli Farmers

The words food lobby have become synonymous with unhealthy food.

In 2015, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, processed food manufacturers spent $32 million on lobbying while
the fruit and vegetable industry spent a mere $3.7 million. Moreover, top fruit and vegetable contributors include the National
Potato Council, which protects potato farmers interests in french fries, and a company that grows tomatoes for fast food
chains.

To understand why the food lobby is dominated by companies pushing unhealthy foods, a good place to start is the huge
imbalance between the amount of fruits and vegetables we should eat and the relative size of the fruits and vegetables
market.

According to nutritional guidelines published by the USDA and the Harvard School of Public Health, fruits and vegetables
should make up 50% of a healthy diet. But the financial value of the fruit and vegetable market is nowhere near 50% of the
food industry.

In 2015, American farmers earned under $50 billion in revenue from fruits and vegetables. In contrast, processed food
manufacturers like ConAgra, General Mills, and Kellogg each make around $15 billion in yearly revenue.
The meat and carb heavy American diet partially explains these disparities. The Department of Agriculture estimates that
Americans eat roughly 50% less fruits and vegetables and over 20% more grains and meat than recommended by its
nutrition guidelines.

But it is the economics of the food industry that really explain why the food lobby pushes unhealthy fare.

Processed foods have high profit margins that fund advertising campaigns and lobbying budgets. The importance of
branding also leads to consolidation that supports special interest lobbying.

We can see this in the case of cereal - one of the earliest processed foods.

When John Harvey Kellogg and Charles Post sold the first modern cereals in the 19th century, they worried about
competitors. Their product was simply processed wheat or corn, and its production was cheap and easy to replicate.

Their solution was to use advertising to create brand names. Charles Post claimed his Grape Nuts could cure malaria. The
Quaker symbol of Quaker Oats became the first nationally recognized cereal brand. As cereal manufacturers fought over
the expanding market, they differentiated their fare through shapes and flavors - and added hefty doses of sugar to make it
more palatable.

These dynamics apply to many processed foods: cheap foods differentiated - and sold at high margins - thanks to brand
names and advertising. And in markets where brand recognition is key, a few businesses come to dominate. In 2015,
Kelloggs, which is currently valued at $26 billion, reported that of every $1 consumers spent on its cereal, it earned 35 cents
of gross profit. (The most profitable vegetable farms earn 24 cents per dollar.)

Kelloggs has a $26 billion market capitalization because it does not just make cereal. It also owns Pringles and
manufactures a variety of processed foods from Eggo Waffles to Famous Amos chocolate chip cookies.

The entire processed foods industry is similarly consolidated. If you follow your favorite snack up the food chain, youll
usually find that it is owned by a multinational company. PepsiCo owns Funyuns, Rold Gold pretzels, and Sun Chips.

Ritz crackers, Oreos, and Wheat Thins sell under the Nabisco label, which is owned by Mondelz International. So
whenever a federal agency supports healthy foods, it picks a fight with a collection of the worlds largest companies.

It is possible to similarly market fruits and vegetables and sell them at a markup. Honeycrisp apples, which
were designed for that satisfying crunch, enjoy a price premium two to three times that of other varieties. Organic has
emerged as a powerful marketing tool, and prices of kale increased 25% over the past 3 years.

Distributors use tactics like selling produce in convenient sizes (such as one snack worth of baby carrots) to differentiate
their products.
In general, though, consumers dont know or care who grew a certain apple or cucumber. The honeycrisp apple is a rarity,
and trends like kale-mania benefit the entire market rather than a single company. Companies do market veggies, but brand
recognition is low.

Brands need a year-round presence in supermarkets so consumers can purchase it routinely, but produce is seasonal.
Efforts to link recognized brands with a certain quality level and a higher price point is hindered by the influence of weather
on quality and prices.

Farmers and companies that grow and sell produce do so at the going rate, which is a leaner business. Vegetable farms
have had boom years and can make good margins. One USDA census has noted that the largest vegetable farms had
annual sales of $500,000 on margins of 24%.

But thats still tiny compared to PepsiCo or General Mills, and the average farm actually loses value and relies on
supplemental, non-farm incomes.
The term processed foods also applies to more than just Oreos and Doritos. When we think of pasta sauce, we normally
dont think of junk food. But as Michael Moss writes in the New York Times Magazine, products like Prego pasta sauce
contain huge amounts of salt and sugar, just like potato chips and cereal.

The processed food industry, then, is profitable, politically powerful, and more enormous than we realize. Is it any surprise
that the food lobby is synonymous with unhealthy foods?

The McDonaldization of the American Farm

While the economics of processed foods can explain their dominance over fruits, vegetables, and healthier fare, it may still
seem surprising.

After all, American farmers receive billions of dollars in annual subsidies, and the American Farm Bureau
often spends millions of dollars lobbying Congress to protect those subsidies and farmers interests. So why arent American
farmers as successful in pushing legislation that favors fresh produce and real food as they are at winning subsidies?

The answer lies in recognizing that the prototypical American farm does not produce healthy food.

The idyllic farms show in Whole Foods advertisements - farms with a variety of crops and livestock - are not representative
of American agriculture. As food journalist Michael Pollan has written, Americas large commercial farms are monocultures,
meaning they specialize in a single crop, which is usually a grain. Together, corn and soy account for almost 50% of all
American crop revenues.

According to Rosamond Naylor and Walter Falcon of Stanford, Americas corn crop is used to produce half of the
sweeteners Americans consume every year in beer and soda. The majority of the crop goes toward feeding cattle (46%)
and ethanol production (25%). Corn also provides the starchy base for processed foods and the oil for McDonalds deep
fryers.
The dominance of grains in American agriculture is not unusual. Just four grains - corn, wheat, rice, and soy - account for so
much of global agricultural output that economists modelling food prices only look at the market for these grains.

Naylor and Falcon note that countries agriculture policy (including that of the United States) has been to increase the yields
of these grains. After all, higher yields mean more productive farms, wealthier farmers, more food, and less hunger.

The American government has intervened extensively in agriculture since the Great Depression, and as food writer Michael
Pollan notes, its subsidies and programs encouraged large farms that specialized in growing a single grain.

The government promoted the research and production of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and higher yield grains,
and the Department of Agriculture encouraged farms to get big or get out.

The government did not dole out decades of subsidies indiscriminately; it subsidized the production of corn, soybeans,
wheat, and rice at a large scale.

In some ways, these policies have been a great success. American farms are profitable and productive: the average corn
belt farmer produces enough crops to feed 140 Americans and makes around $200,000 in income. The average American
now enjoys half a pound of meat per day - an amount once considered princely.
But the government's calorie-maximizing policies no longer make sense in a country as troubled by obesity as by hunger. In
its push for large monocultures, and in order to buy the peace of specialized vegetable farms, the USDA prohibited farms
that receive grain subsidies from growing fruits and vegetables. (An ironic example of vegetable farmers flexing their
lobbying muscles.)

This puts the government in the insane position of subsidizing the cost of fast food while actively prohibiting more farms from
growing fruits and vegetables.

Even farm animals, which are cheaper to raise when they can be fed with subsidized grain, have a mixed nutrition record.
Most nutritionists consider meat part of a healthy diet, but they also believe Americans eat too much meat.

In addition, grain subsidies, as well as the lack of any policy prohibiting the regular use of antibiotics in animal feed, enable
farmers to raise animals at scale in confined areas. (The antibiotics keep animals alive in the filthy conditions of small
cages.) Cheap meat is a great luxury, but this system makes McDonalds hamburgers and Kentucky Fried Chicken cheaper
than healthier foods.

Americas large, profitable farms spend millions on lobbying each year and enjoy substantial access to lawmakers. The
problem is that almost none of these farms provide a counterweight to manufacturers of junk and processed foods. Thanks
in part to outdated and politically-expedient agricultural policy, farms lobbying power protects french fries, Big Macs, and
soda rather than leafy greens.

The Food Pyramids Corrupt Foundation

With this understanding of Americas food industry and its lobbying prowess, we can understand a certain mystery behind
the food pyramid: why it promoted a diet at odds with the advice of nutritionists for nearly 20 years.

In 1992, the United States Department of Agriculture unveiled the food pyramid, its guide to healthy eating.

Thanks to government efforts to publicize it - pushing it into doctors offices and home economics classes - the
majority of Americans recognize the food pyramid.

The nutritional guidelines behind the food pyramid also inform policy like school lunches and food stamps, making it the
countrys most influential nutrition document.

During its 24-year lifespan, the food pyramid has changed significantly. The base of the original pyramid contained loaves of
bread, plates of pasta, and bowls of cereal. But in the food plate, which replaced the pyramid in 2011, grains only take up
20% of the plate, which is dominated by fruits and vegetables.

The changes do not represent a new understanding of nutrition; the story of the food pyramid is the most highly
visible demonstration of the food and agriculture sectors lobbying prowess.
Dr. Luise Light is a nutrition expert and led the team at the Department of Agriculture that made the original
recommendations for the food pyramid. If you review her original recommendations, they sound similar to dietary advice
given by nutritionists today: lots of vegetables, more lean sources of protein like fish and nuts, and less dairy and processed
foods.

Those guidelines, according to Dr. Light, did not survive their trip to the office of the Head of the Department of
Agriculture.

She has described herself as shocked by the changes that were made. Her team placed fruits and vegetables at the base
of the pyramid and whole-grain breads and cereals further up.

The new guidelines not only switched carbohydrates to the base of the pyramid, they moved processed foods like crackers
and corn flakes, which Dr. Light and her team had placed at the top of the pyramid with chocolate, to the base too. Even
with all the edits, the food pyramid was not released for another 12 years.

With an understanding of the food lobby, its not hard to understand why. The companies that make processed foods and
the large American farms that grow grains wanted to see carb-heavy foods promoted at the base of the pyramid; the tiny
leafy greens lobby could not make its voice heard.
As in 1992, every five years, when the Department of Agriculture revisits its nutrition guidelines, the food industry gears
up by releasing floods of reports, nominating friendly (and on-salary) researchers to be part of the USDA committee
reviewing the policies, and appealing to allies in Congress and the White House.

This means that new policies are always a battle between public-interest organizations pushing for healthier guidelines and
a food lobby working to subvert them. The result is that improving our food policy - at best - takes a step backward for every
two steps forward.

...

The American government wields enormous influence over our diet. Federal policy shapes our farm system to a remarkable
degree and sets the lunch menu for millions of schoolchildren. As long as food lobbyists overwhelmingly represent the
makers of unhealthy food, health advocates will always struggle to push policy in a healthier direction.
To some extent, this is inevitable. The profit margins for making a branded bar of sugar are better than for growing brussel
sprouts, which creates more money for lobbying against labelling laws, sugar taxes, and so on. But the current status quo, in
which American farms grow crops for unhealthy products like high fructose corn syrup, is the result of outdated agricultural
policy.

"Good advice about nutrition conflicts with the interests of many big industries, Michael Jacobson, co-founder of
the Center for Science in the Public Interest, has said, each of which has more lobbying power than all the public-
interest groups combined.

But the real problem is that manufacturers of unhealthy food are so powerful that those interests groups are always the
pushing snack foods rather than fruit.

Theres a lot of money to be made selling obesity foods, and you cant move America [the world] in a healthier
direction without confronting the salty, sugary, finger-licking, just-one-more-chip financial firepower of the food
industrial complex.

Putin: Human Evolution Under Big Threat From GMOs, Vaccines

+ Media Struggles To Pin Stupid Label On Well-Educated Vaccine Dissenters
March 29 2016 | From: NatrualNews / Sott / Various

Those who support vaccine choice and oppose genetically modifying our food chain have an
unlikely ally: Russian President Vladimir Putin.
As reported by the Health Freedom Alliance, a report that was prepared by the Russian Security Council (SCRF), a
report which is currently circulating within the Kremlin, says that Putin has given orders to protect the Russian
people from GMO "food" as well as Western pharmaceuticals "at all costs."

Related: Pediatrician Resigns Because American Association of Pediatrics Knows Vaccines Cause Autism

The report states that Putin believes the next phase of human evolution is being put at "grave risk," and that Western and
other great powers are "intentionally decelerating the process for their personal gain."

"... some parents may feel uncertain about vaccines partly because they're skeptical of pharmaceutical companies,
whose profit motives mix with their vaccine-promotion campaigns.

And while state governments can mandate immunization, this may end up pushing parents away from the public-
school system if they feel that regulations are forcing them to make certain decisions about their children's health."

"We as a species have the choice to continue to develop our bodies and brains in a healthy upward trajectory, or
we can follow the Western example of recent decades and intentionally poison our population with genetically
altered food, pharmaceuticals, vaccinations, and fast food that should be classified as a dangerous, addictive
drug," says the report.

"We must fight this. A physically and intellectually disabled population is not in our interests," the report added.

As further reported by the Health Freedom Alliance:

"Describing the average government-controlled Westerner as an 'intensively vaccinated borderline autistic fat man
slumped in front of a screen battling a high-fructose corn syrup comedown,' the report states that such tactics used
by governments to subjugate their citizens are not only 'dark/evil' but 'counter-productive in the medium to long
term.'"
'Largest World Supplier of Healthy, Ecologically Clean and High-Quality food'

Under Putin, who is a billionaire himself, the Russian government has been giving away land for free over the past few years
to anyone who is willing to plant and farm organically and sustainably, with the goal of becoming the world's "leading
exporter" of non-GMO foods that are based on "ecologically clean" production.

The report comes just a few months after the Kremlin announced that it planned to halt production of all GMO foods, seen
by the international organic community as a major step in the fight against multinational GMO pushers like Monsanto and
Syngenta.

And Russia is continuing to lead the way in organic, natural food production.

In December, RT.com reported on Putin's intent to become the world's biggest organic food producer.

At the same time, Putin condemned U.S. food manufacturing, as well as food production in other countries, for no longer
offering high quality, healthy and ecologically clean food.

"We are not only able to feed ourselves taking into account our lands, water resources Russia is able to become
the largest world supplier of healthy, ecologically clean and high-quality food which the Western producers have
long lost, especially given the fact that demand for such products in the world market is steadily growing," the
Russian leader said in a speech to Parliament.

Food self-sufficient and GMO free

Putin added that Russia had become a net exporter of food rather than an importer.
 "Ten years ago, we imported almost half of the food from abroad, and were dependent on imports. Now Russia is
among the exporters.

Last year, Russian exports of agricultural products amounted to almost $20 billion - a quarter more than the
revenue from the sale of arms, or one-third the revenue coming from gas exports," he said, noting that the country
was on track to becoming completely food-self-sufficient by 2020.

In January, the Russian leader criticized both Western Big Pharma and GMO foods, the Australian National
Review reported, a familiar theme:

"Three years ago, the Russian government was considering imposing a ban on the participation of foreign drug
producers in the tendering for public procurement of drugs if there are already two similar drugs created by local
manufacturers," the Australian site noted.

"The measure was meant to encourage international pharmaceutical producers to localize their production in
Russia and to reduce the share of imported drugs in the total procurements, which was estimated at around 85 per
cent. The initiative was put forward by Russia's Ministry of Industry and Trade."

Media Struggles To Pin Stupid Label On Well-Educated Vaccine Dissenters

Related: Lead Developer Of HPV Vaccines Comes Clean, Warns Parents & Young Girls Its All A Giant Deadly Scam
There have been numerous articles in mainstream newspapers and magazines with titles that disparage anyone who
questions the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, disagrees (in part or in total) with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention's (CDC) recommended schedule of vaccines, or opposes the idea of forcing people to get vaccinated
against their will.

You can be a vaccine skeptic, a complete "anti-vaxxer" or someone who simply doesn't like the government dictating what
one should or shouldn't do with one's body. It doesn't matter.

Related: Finally! Studies Prove That Unvaccinated Children Are Far Healthier

If you choose to reject any part of the current vaccine paradigm, as crafted by the government and the pharmaceutical
industry, you will be put on to stupid list, even though, ironically, it is widely acknowledged that people who choose to chart
their own way on the issue of vaccines tend to be extremely well-educated and often have advanced degrees.
In 2014, The Huffington Post published an article titled "Anti-Vaxxers Are Stupid and Contagious." That piece was written by
the senior editor of The Huffington Post Canada, Joshua Ostroff, so it wasn't just some random person submitting an article
to the publication. That same year, the Los Angeles Times published "Rich, educated and stupid parents are driving the
vaccination crisis" and the Chicago Tribune published "Anti-vaccine debate proves you can't fix stupid."

Take a Look at this Dtap Vaccine Insert

The Dtap vaccine insert says in plain text that it causes autism, sudden infant death, apnea, seizures up to gran mal,
neuropathy AND MORE. Interesting it is that the standard vaccine side effects - triggering allergies and other normal stuff is
not even listed and in their own words "what they listed was prioritized for frequency and severity". So it causes Autism and
other horrible brain damage so much that the normal stuff vaccines used to be known for is not even listed.
Yep, but it is glyphosate causing autism, look away from thew vaccines, yes, we have it, It is Glyphosate, look the
other way please!

In 2015, Australia's The Daily Telegraph published an article titled "Until they come up with a vaccine for stupidity, anti-
vaxxers live on." The newspaper followed up earlier this year with "Just when you thought anti-vaxxers couldn't get more
stupid."

These are only a handful of the articles you can find with the word "stupid" or a variation of it in the title.

There are countless other articles in the mainstream press with words in the title that convey a similar message. It is unclear
what the owners, editors and writers of reputable publications believe they stand to gain from this form of journalism.

Common sense might tell you that it's not such a good a idea to insult a segment of your audience.

Related: This Australian Police Officer lost his job/career for exposing vaccine crimes/shaken baby syndrome
Interesting enough, there may be emerging a shift in another direction. Last year, NBC News published an article titled"Don't
Call Them Dumb: Experts on Fighting the Anti-Vaccine Movement."

The piece, written by Maggie Fox, suggested that belittling people with regard to vaccines may, in fact, be helping them
attract sympathizers because many people don't like to see others being abused, and "some of the criticism on cable
television, social media and in mainstream newspapers and magazines is starting to look like bullying."

More recently, Emma Green's article in The Atlantic, is titled "Anti-Vaxers Aren't Stupid." In her piece, Green cites Professor
Mark Largent of Michigan State University and author of the book Vaccine: The Debate in Modern America.

According to Green, Prof. Largent, who is an associate professor and director of the Science, Technology, Environment, and
Public Policy program at MSU, notes that 40% of parents in the United States have either refused or delayed a
vaccine for one of their children.

So why is it that so many parents are having doubts about vaccines and vaccination policy? Apparently, it has nothing to do
with their level of intellect, but rather the low degree of trust they have in the federal government and the pharmaceutical
industry.

"... some parents may feel uncertain about vaccines partly because they're skeptical of pharmaceutical companies,
whose profit motives mix with their vaccine-promotion campaigns.

And while state governments can mandate immunization, this may end up pushing parents away from the public-
school system if they feel that regulations are forcing them to make certain decisions about their children's health."
According to Green, Prof. Largent also attributes some of the skepticism toward vaccines on the part of parents to
the "monolithic power of science" - the sense that doctors and medical researchers have an overwhelming amount
of power and control over what happens to their children, and that that may make parents uncomfortable to the
point where they seek to offset that power and control by doing their own research.

"Faced with this imbalance of power and information, who can blame parents for being nervous and striking out on
the Internet for a second opinion?"

Still, Prof. Largent's attempt to explain why so many well-educated people refuse to follow the party line on vaccines does
not mean that he believes they are right or even offer some valid points.

To the contrary, according to Green, Prof. Largent has said, "Vaccinology has nothing to learn from anti-vaxers." But Prof.
Largent at least appears to be open to "engaging" rather than merely insulting those who hold different views. That's
something.

Comment:

Author Marco Cceres wrote another good article about what happens when anyone chooses to reject any part of the
current vaccine paradigm: Internet trolls: Anyone resisting the vaccine party line is a target

Increasingly, professionals within a wide range of health care and science fields are giving interviews and writing
articles and books voicing their concerns about vaccine risks, the misrepresentation of the historical role of
vaccines in reducing mortality from infectious diseases, the expanding schedule and number of vaccines
mandated, or even the basic mechanism theories behind vaccine science.

Predictably, every time you give the name of a contrarian doctor or scientist in response to the 99.9% figure, what you tend
to get is, "Eh, well, he's a quack, she's not credible."

Also, you get referred to blogs such as Science-Based Medicine, or Respectful Insolence, or the Skeptical Raptor's Blog.
They're often written by or associated with a guy named David Gorski, MD, who also goes by the alias "Orac." Gorski is a
surgical oncologist and an assistant professor of surgery at Wayne State University School of Medicine in Detroit, MI4.

Should you wish to debunk someone, anyone, who dares to disagree with mainstream thinking on vaccines, all you need do
is inform Orac, and the good doctor will gladly oblige by writing up a boorish piece, long on insult and short on science.
Orac's methods are painfully predictable.

Related: Baby monkeys given standard doses of popular vaccines develop autism

Sunscreen Causes Cancer? What You May Not Know About Sunscreen
March 26 2016 | From: NaturalNews

Who would think that sunscreen causes cancer?

It has been only a fairly recent development, but it still could cause some serious shock and awe when everyone
figures out that conventional sunscreen found in drugstores nationally could be a potential risk factor for skin
cancer.

Related: How Dermatologists Fuel Chronic Disease Rates With Their Flawed Sun Exposure Guidelines

Sunscreens are made to protect and help your body, so why are we finding out that sunscreen causes cancer? It could be
simply widespread ignorance, or it could be that the FDA has kept this secret under wraps for at least a decade.

Sunscreen Causes Cancer?

Studies conducted indicate the dangers of certain chemical compounds within sunscreen could be causing a variety of skin
damaging ailments, especially when reacting with the suns intensive heat.

Though the FDA had supervised and funded the studies showing key ingredients related to vitamin A as carcinogenic, they
knowingly prevented the information from being released to the public whatsoever up until recently.

The synthetic vitamin A compound found in many sunscreen brands contain retinol and retinyl palmitate, both found to react
negatively in the sunlight, becoming toxic to the system.

This isnt to be confused with the health-enhancing vitamin A that is found in many foods it is a purely synthetic and
ultimately useless ingredient. When combined with the extensive use over time, this kind of sunscreen can lead to skin
damage in its users.

These arent the only things to be worried about when applying your doctor-recommended photocarcinogen, though.
Oxybenzone and other vague mystery chemicals are found amongst a wide variety of name brand sunscreens, with many of
these having yet to be proven as safe to use at all.
About 8 percent of all sunscreens have been quality tested by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) to be both safe and
effective for the intended use, whereas the other 92 percent contain at least one (if not many more) of the ingredients
designated as detrimental for human use, further adding to the worry if sunscreen causes cancer.

This means the public not only has been encouraged to buy something that is known to be detrimental for at least a decade,
but is only left with a selection that is 8% safe.

Not only that, but the sunscreens widely credited as preventative cures for skin cancer are also the root cause of a
widespread vitamin D deficiency a vitamin shown to slash flu risk and fight cancer. There has also been a connection
made between vitamin D and weight loss. Vitamin D production is extremely limited when sunscreen is used to protect the
body from natural sunlight.

So, now that there has been some research showing sunscreen causes cancer, the question remains: what will people do
about it? On a larger scale, it must be demanded by enough people for the harmful ingredients to be omitted from
sunscreens.

Until then, tell the companies using these ingredients that you dont want their toxic products. Spend your dollar on a safe
sunscreen with safe ingredients.

Non-Addictive Natural Pain Killer Kratom Relieves Chronic Pain, Depression - Leave
Rx Drugs Behind
March 24 2016 | From: JBBardot

Kratom is a tree native to Southeast Asia that is widely known as natures vicodin. The leaves of
the tree can be chewed, made into a tea, or dried and added to capsules that cure anxiety,
depression, migraines and many types of chronic pain.
The plant acts as both a mild sedative when used sparingly; and in large doses, as a stimulant. It can also be used
to wean patients off opiate addictions such as heroin and morphine.

The plant is from the same family as the coffee tree, and Thai people have used Kratom leaves as a form of medicine for
centuries to treat conditions such as diarrhea, nervousness and opiate withdrawal.

Many long-term users of Kratom claim that it is more effective at managing pain than many powerful painkillers such as
morphine and vicodin, and is far less addictive than chemical narcotics.

The DEA has placed Kratom onto their Drugs and Chemicals of Concern list in the past, and it is illegal in Australia,
Thailand, Malaysia and Burma. It is available over-the-counter in powder form, dried leaves, capsules and as an extract, and
there have been no reported cases of overdose or serious side-effects.

History of Kratom

The first documented cases about Kratom comes from the early 19th century after a Dutch Botanist named Pieter Korthals
commented on how the leaves of the tree reminded him of a Bishops mitre and named the tree Mitragyna.
There is not much evidence available on the use of Kratom before Europes colonisation of Asia, but it is generally believed
that Asian people have used this herb for hundreds of years.

Farmworkers would often chew the leaves as a pick me up in the morning in the same way as many people now rely on
coffee. In 1943, the Thai government passed a new law banning the use of kratom citing it as a dangerous drug, although
many people believe the move was to protect the governments investment in the booming opiate business.

Despite the ban, kratom use continues in Thailand even though the government imposes strong penalties on those caught
with the herb.

Kratom as a Painkiller

Kratom is perfectly legal in the United States and many advocates of the herb claim it has similar pain relieving properties as
marijuana. The web is filled with misinformation about this wonderful herb, and the DEA and many different mainstream
news sources try to categorize it with the latest harmful drug trends such as bath salts.
According to its users, taking a small amount of kratom extract everyday will benefit those suffering from all forms of pain
including past injuries, nerve damage, headaches and arthritis. Kratom contains two compounds known as mitragynine and
7-hydroxymitragynine which have been found to have mildly sedative effects when used on rats.

Kratom is reported to be mildly psychoactive, and users have noted that they can experience feelings of extreme well being
and blissfulness.

Other Uses

As well as pain relief, kratom can be used to combat fatigue, social anxiety, stress and is said to provide sexual
enhancement for men. Many people also use it as a substitute for coffee as it provides a more level burst of energy without
the inevitable caffeine crash after a few hours.
Possible Side-Effects or Drug Interactions

Due to its sedative effects, kratom should never be mixed with any other type of substance especially alcohol. A study
performed at the Department of Human Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences in Malaysia found that giving a
mixture of mitragynine and morphine to rats in the laboratory reduced the amount of tolerance the rats built up to the
morphine over time.

There needs to be further research performed into the pain-relieving properties of kratom as according to users testimonies
it could provide a safe and non-addictive alternative to strong pain medication such as morphine, vicodin and oxycontin.

Stunning Infographic Showing How Heavy Metals End Up In The Food Supply Due To
Industrial Pollution
March 23 2016 | From: NaturalNews

You've probably heard food companies and nutritional supplement manufacturers claim that high
levels of lead found in their products is "naturally occurring." But they're LYING.
The truth is that high levels of toxic heavy metals show up in foods, superfoods and supplements due to industrial
pollution... including decades of spraying lead arsenate on croplands.

A new infographic has been released that reveals the cycle of heavy metals in food and the environment

As this infographic and video both reveal, toxic heavy metals enter the food supply from contaminated soils, and soils
are contaminated from a multitude of sources, including:

Dental offices (mercury)

Coal power (mercury)

Pesticides (lead and arsenic)

Mining operations (copper, nickel, lead, etc.)

Human waste that's recycled by cities into "biosolids" used on crops

Contaminated municipal water pipes (lead)

Chicken feed that's "medicated" with arsenic

Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

Get the full story on heavy metals in food in the upcoming book "Food Forensics"

In my new book Food Forensics, I detail the heavy metals composition of over 800 foods. All that data are derived from my
laboratory analysis from the Natural News Forensic Food Labs (now named CWC Labs).

The book is available now for pre-sale on Amazon, BN.com and other booksellers. That book is set to take the food industry
by storm by revealing the truth about heavy metals in foods, supplements and superfoods.

Consumed
March 20 2016 | From: ConsumedTheMovie

Consumed is a dramatic thriller that explores the complex world of genetically modified food.

The story is anchored by a working-class, single Mother on a hunt to uncover the cause of her son's mysterious
illness.

Interwoven are the stories of an Organic farmer, the CEO of a biotechnology corporation, two Scientists on the verge of a
major discovery, and an ex-Cop caught in the middle of it all.
DARK Act Defeated In U.S. Senate As Lawmakers Receive Tidal Wave Of Calls From
Angry Food Consumers Who Are Tired Of Being LIED To About GMO In Their Food
March 19 2016 | From: NaturalNews

The DARK Act has beendefeated in the U.S. Senate, achieving a massive victory for consumers
and also for the Environmental Working Group, which helped organize large-scale opposition to
the bill.

The DARK Act would have outlawed state-level GMO labeling laws nationwide, condemning American food
consumers to remaining completely in the dark over the genetically engineered content of their food. This outcome
is also somewhat of a harbinger for countries in the rest of the world...

Natural News thanks all our readers who took action to help defeat the DARK Act. We are fighting for your right to know
what you're eating, and with your help, we really can defeat Monsanto and its minions like Ted Cruz. ("Monsatan's
Preacher.")

Tidal Wave of Calls Slammed Senators Nationwide

I spoke to industry insiders this morning who confirmed that the offices of many U.S. Senators were hit hard with a "tidal
wave of calls" from concerned Americans. Even many Republican senators are starting to come around on this issue, and
GMO labeling continues to gain steam across the country as food consumers increase their demand for honest food labels
and overall food transparency.

The Environmental Working Group released a statement on the victory:

In a major win for consumers, Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) failed to earn the votes he needed to stop debate on a
bill known to opponents as the Deny Americans the Right to Know Act, or DARK Act.

According to EWG, the defeat of the DARK Act offers Congress the opportunity to find a compromise for a national
mandatory GMO labeling measure that consumers and industry can support.

Scott Faber, senior vice president for government affairs, said:

"Consumers have made their voices heard to their elected representatives in the Senate and they said clearly, 'We
 want the right to know more about our food.' We are pleased that the Senate made the right decision to stop the
DARK Act, and we remain hopeful that Congressional leaders can craft a national mandatory compromise that
works for consumers and the food industry. We applaud Senators Debbie Stabenow, Jeff Merkley, Jon Tester,
Barbara Boxer and Pat Leahy for their efforts to defeat the DARK Act.""

Scott Faber Vindicated After Mini Civil War Inside the Labeling Movement

The defeat of the DARK Act vindicates Scott Faber, who was previously accused by several pro-labeling industry insiders as
siphoning money away from state ballot measures (Natural News covered this story and quoted three industry sources).
However, it is clear from today's victory that Scott Faber is working hard for labeling at the national level, and he
deserves tremendous credit for today's victory, regardless of the previous disagreements among labeling advocates in the
"states vs. federal" debate.

It's clear that the Environmental Working Group and the Just Label It campaign are both on the right track so far, and the
EWG now tells Natural News that they fully support the Merkley bill created by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore) which creates
a national mandatory standard for GMO labeling.

As explained by Consumers Union:

Consumers Union, the policy and advocacy arm of Consumer Reports, today praised the introduction of the
Biotechnology Food Labeling Uniformity Act. The legislation, sponsored by Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), would
create a national standard for GMO labeling and require food manufacturers to label products with GMO
ingredients via one of several options on the ingredients list section of the Nutrition Facts Panel.

Another option would give FDA the authority to develop a symbol, in consultation with food manufacturers, which
would disclose the presence of GM ingredients on packaging.

Jean Halloran, director of food policy initiatives for Consumers Union, said, "This is what real disclosure looks like.
This bill finds a way to set a national standard and avoid a patchwork of state labeling laws while still
giving consumers the information they want and deserve about what's in their food.

This compromise offers food companies different labeling options and ensures that all consumers no matter
where they are in the country or whether they own a smartphone have the information they overwhelmingly say
they want. We urge Senators to support this proposal as they move forward on GMO labeling legislation."

Merkley's bill comes the day after the Senate Agriculture Committee voted to move forward an anti-consumer bill
that would preempt state GMO labeling laws and direct USDA to develop duplicative standards for voluntary
labeling and promote biotechnology.

The legislation, which is supported by biotech giants and some of the country's largest food companies, is the
latest attempt to block a Vermont law requiring labeling on the package of genetically engineered food sold in the
state before it goes in to effect July 1.

Consumers Union is urging consumers to call on their lawmakers to oppose preemption of state GMO labeling
laws, and to support meaningful, mandatory on-package labeling for GMO foods, including engineered animals like
salmon and engineered produce and processed food. To learn more, visit: ConsumersUnion.org/RightToKnow

Why Are These 25 Carcinogens Still Being Sold?

March 15 2016 | From: Sott

The FDA is a killer organization. So superior are they, and so very post-modern, that it seems
they've transcended meaning, analysis, and the law of cause and effect.
Given their exalted status, should it really surprise that they've not noticed the myriad ways they've advanced the
march of carcinogens? After all, it's not like they run studies, check results, or have some sort of mandate to
protect, right?

With this in mind, let's examine a few of the carcinogens approved, ignored, and/or excused by the FDA; whose motto really
ought to be, "move along, there's nothing to see, here".

1. Baby Powder. The talc in this powder is linked to ovarian cancer. The FDA's response? Too much money at stake to
investigate. Very nihilistic, FDA! Nietzsche would approve.

2. Cosmetics. It's a beautiful thing that the cosmetics industry uses industrial factory cleaners to pulchrify womankind,
don't you think? No regulation needed here, folks. Even though said chemicals have been found to cause cancer, disrupt
hormones, and presage early puberty. I mean, the FDA is really busy. You can't expect them to examine everything, can
you?
 3. Birth control. The estrogen and progesterone within birth control have been found to "lead to cancer". But since there's
no "smoking gun", why "rock the boat"? After all, "the show must go on". "It's just business". And an investigation might just
"kill profit margins". Priorities, folks. Priorities.

4. Fluoride. Harvard scientists have found that boys in their 6th, 7th, and 8th years, are highly susceptible to
osteosarcomas related to fluoride. Add to this the fact that fluoride is a mutagen, which means it alters DNA, and a
neurotoxin, and it becomes quite clear the FDA is right to be unconcerned about allowing fluoride in our drinking water.
Good job, old sport. Keep earning our trust.
 5. Pesticides. Roughly 60% of pesticides lead directly to cancer. But the EPA seems rather bored with this statistic. Now,
there has been "some news lately", about a "new standard", that's "less deadly". Whatever. It's the circle of life. We have to
put toxins on our crops that will kill us, so that the food we reap can keep us alive till we die. Can't you people understand
this?!

6. Sugar. A large part of the Standard American Diet (S.A.D.), sugar makes America go! Oh, did I mention
sugar exponentially increases the growth of cancer cells? Well, too bad. We have to have it, cells or no. Whether it's in soda,
candy, or children's cereal (aka sugar), the FDA is right to sleep on this one. Otherwise, how could people stay awake
during the endless forty-hour work week?

7. Aspartame. This sweetener/carcinogen was rescued from oblivion by Monsanto, who bought out the agency that was
challenging it's production. Listed as "toxic poison" by those in the know, Aspartame causes so many disorders it would take
a separate article to cover to them all. Suffice it to say, the FDA and Monsanto are class acts, that obviously care deeply
about human life. You stay classy, San Diego.
 8. Ersatz Sugar and Diet Cola. Aspartame, Aspartame, Aspartame. People reason taking this toxic carcinogen (which
many KNOW is such) makes more sense than consuming real sugar, which might cause them to put on weight. At least I
think that's why they do it. After all, who in their right mind would choose Aspartame for its flavor? To summarize, many
otherwise bright individuals voluntarily put a foul tasting chemical into their bodies, that might kill them, to (potentially) keep
trim. Ironically, Aspartame may just be making Americans a lot fatter.

9. Smoking. Fifteen different types of cancer are caused by cigarettes, which contain six-hundred "ingredients", that when
burned, turn into seven-thousand chemicals, sixty-nine of which cause cancer. Too bad you can't smoke Aspartame, eh,
Phillip Morris?

10. Cell Phones. The WHO believes cell phones are "possibly carcinogenic", and French researchers have found there is
a threefold added risk of brain tumor growth in cell users with 900 plus hours exposure. Swedish researchers have
concluded there is a similar risk for those who've used them twenty-five years or more. The main stream governmental and
scientific community's response to this? "Yeah, right! Nobody messes with progress." It's business before pleasure, and by
pleasure, I mean human life.

11. Soy. Eating soy "may" turn on genes linked to cancer growth. And right now, I "may" be thinking of sarcastic things to
say about our regulatory agencies. But I digress.
 12. BPA. According to Forbes, BPA is not harmful. (Thanks, guys; clearly there's no conflict of interest.) Now, on to
what real scientists are saying. Apparently BPA disrupts genes that defend against cancer. So, okay, maybe it doesn't
CAUSE cancer, but it helps the things that cause cancer cause cancer. So please be sure not to touch or eat from plastic
containers anymore, or handle glossy receipts. (Oh, wait, that's impossible.) Now, moving on to more things Forbes
probably isn't worried about.

13. Acetaminophen. Risk of blood cancer doubles for users of this pain-killer.

14. Statins. Speaking of drugs that effect the blood, several statins have been found to be carcinogenic. Now if that
doesn't raise your pressure, nothing will.

15. GMOs. A major study found recently that GMO maize caused cancer in lab rats. Surprisingly, the study was tabled.
They say money doesn't grow on trees, but the way Monsanto and the GMO crowd create organic anomalies, I'm starting to
wonder. And where was the FDA in all of this? Oh, right! Drinking cocktails with Hillary Clinton at O'Malley's Irish Pub.
Clearly there's something wrong with you if you don't favor crossing human genes with corn, or corn with the hepatitis virus.
That's just progress. I mean, how could such things go wrong?

16. Pollution. File this one under "part of the cost of doing business". Seems we can't create profits without creating
poison, or create poison without turning it into food.

17. Microwave ovens. Swiss researcher Hans Hertel has concluded that when we eat microwaved food, our cells form
emergency anaerobic environments in response, the exact condition which leads to cancer cell growth. But don't worry, the
internetz is full of edumacational articles saying the opposite.

18. Lead. Did you know that lead in lipstick may cause cancer? Why is lead in lipstick, anyway? Who was the first person
who thought that would be a good idea? Perhaps it's inspired by Hamlet's famous quip, "Here's metal more attractive". Yes,
that must be it.

19. Processed meats. These include hot dogs, ham, bacon, sausage, and some deli meats, which have been "treated" to
"improve the flavor". Yummy.
 20. Gardasil. This vaccine increases the risk of precancerous legions by 44.6%, if the person has already been exposed
to HPV 16 or 18, before injection.

21. Research shows LED bulbs have tiny cracks in them that release UV rays, which burn skin cells, causing melanoma.
(Too bad you can't find the old bulbs anymore.)

22. High fructose corn syrup. How many hundreds of products is this little monster hiding in? It's ubiquity doesn't erase
the fact that it's known to cause pancreatic cancer.

23. McDonald's McRib Sandwich. First of all, the entire fast food industry is a disgrace. It puts things in food that just
boggle the mind (such as azodicarbonamide, an ingredient Subway once put in their breads. By the way, it's also found in
yoga mats.) But the disgusting McRib takes the cake. Chemicals used in soil fertilizer are found in it, as well as the
aforementioned Subway chemical. Plus the pickles are carcinogenic. And the FDA just stands there, hands in its pockets,
with a stupid expression, looking like Napoleon Dynamite. Can't you just hear them saying, "Tina you fat lard, come get
dinner. Tina! Eat the FOOD!"?
 24. Monsanto. Due to this wonderful organization's role in saving Aspartame from destruction, mass-producing GMO's,
and filling the world with deadly toxins, I feel Monsanto deserves a special place on this list of carcinogens. Bravo. And
props to the FDA for defending us from this monster. You guys are the best.

25. The Standard American Diet (S.A.D.). Let's add things up from the list. Processed meats? Check. Total sugar
overload? Check. Aspartame? Check. GMO's, fake cheese, fake juice and brominated bread? Check, check, check, check.
Put it in the microwave, and double down on the fun. Or you could just cook a frozen dinner. Everything is encouraged by
our friends at the FDA, except cooking organic food, in a natural oven, with real butter and raw milk. In fact, if you produce
raw milk, you might just get raided by the FBI.

Why in the world are these twenty-five carcinogens still being sold? And why is proffering poison so fashionable,
while pure products are priced out of reach?

Our world is now suffused with corporately created carcinogens, which build up the bodies of abstract entities, but give living
beings the shaft. And all Washington seems concerned with is running Trump vs. Hillary, and bombing the tar out of Syria.
Meanwhile, the SAD American diet clearly leads to cancer, and the health machine's one response is to use toxic poison to
"help solve the problem".

All sarcasm aside, the FDA, EPA, and the myriad agencies responsible for monitoring food, health, and beauty, are
doing such a terrible job, I think it not outlandish to question whether the whole system isn't corrupt, and designed
for a tragic end?
Cosmetics, sugar, technology, and fast food: these attractive items are like the glistening fibers of a spider's web. "How
could this lovely thing be dangerous", thinks the fly. Little does he know, his appetite for attractive objects is well known to
the spider.

The food we're eating is eating us. Our medicine bites, and its oversight sucks. Meanwhile, where has the spider gone? He's
hiding behind the Board, looking respectably bespectacled. The last people you would expect to be monsters seem to be
the first to profit from human misery.

Let's face it, either they really are monsters, or they're so incompetent, they ought to be placed on a short bus. You tell me
which alternative makes more sense?

The good news is that, even though the FDA is just awful, we can make lists like this of products to avoid. We don't have to
eat ourselves to death by imbibing the likes of Aspartame. And perhaps, with enough awareness, we can put these
companies out of business. Viva la revolucion!

Comment: FDA approved additives in our food that are banned in other countries You have to ask why the United
States still allows proven carcinogens to be added to our foods. Why they allow arsenic in chicken feed, and why it
allows companies to lure in children with bright attractive packaging when they know those kids are going to be
guzzling flame retardants...

There are literally dozens of additives that are banned around the world that still find their way legally into
the foods eaten in the United States.

It amazes me that a government that considers itself able to police the world, who thinks they have the
right to interfere in the lives of millions globally cannot ensure that it's own citizens are able to consume
everyday foods in the sure knowledge that they are not being poisoned.

Read What The Drug Companies Have Written About Their Own Drugs!
+ The Mission - Gwen Olsen - The Rx Reformer
March 11 2016 | From: MMSnews

Many of us have seen these titles below in medical news around the world about how deadly
prescription drugs are in the human body.

How Pharmaceuticals Came to be the 4th Leading Cause Of Death In America

Prescription Painkillers Now the Leading Cause of Accidental Deaths

Death from Prescription Drugs: The New Epidemic Sweeping Across America

Prescriptions Drugs Now the Leading Cause of Death By Overdose

Before the advent of Big Pharma early in the 20th century, these statistics just did not exist but now we have to deal with
so many needless deaths from toxins that are entering the body through prescribed medications. One thing people can do is
to make a more informed decision in what they allow to be put in their bodies.

Every pharmaceutical company that has an approved drug on the world market has to disclose a list of information good
and bad about each drug it produces in publication called, package insert. Being approved doesnt mean it is safe or non-
toxic in your body as you will see from their own publications!

What is in the Package Insert?

The package insert is a very detailed publication and filled with information provided by the drug manufacturer and approved
by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Each country or region has its own agency that regulates drugs and
provides the information that consumers receive with their prescriptions.

In India, it is the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO), which is commonly referred to as the Drugs
Controller General (DCG). In Europe, it is the European Medicines Agency (EMA), where the package insert is known as the
patient information leaflet (PIL).
Package inserts (also known as Prescribing Information or drug labels) are available for all prescription medications
approved by the FDA. Similar information is available for nonprescription medicines and for some herbal medicines and
dietary supplements as well.

The package insert can usually be found online on the drug manufacturer's web site and also available in a reference book
called the Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR).

The information in a package insert is in technical language. It is usually very long and can be difficult to understand. It is a
good idea to look through it, because it lists important information about the drug. The package insert follows a standard
format for every drug. After some identifying information such as the drug's brand name, generic name, and initial year of
FDA approval, the following sections appear:
 1. Highlights of Prescribing Information
2. Indications and Usage
3. Dosage and Administration
4. Dosage Forms and Strengths

Note: Pay special attention to these bolded sections.

5. Contraindications
6. Warnings and Precautions
7. Adverse Reactions
8. Drug Interactions

9. Use in Specific Populations

10. Over dosage
11. Description
12. Clinical Pharmacology
13. Nonclinical Toxicology
14. Clinical Studies
15. References
16. How Supplied/Storage and Handling
17. Patient Counseling Information

See more at: TheWellProject

A woman here in Colombia whom we are giving sacramental guidance has been telling me about the symptoms she has
been having the past few years from certain drugs. She is taking a drug called, atenolol. Below, is a list of the Adverse
Reactions in the package insert from the Drug company.

See: NDC Code(s): 16571-430-11, 16571-431-11, 16571-441-11

Packager: Pack Pharmaceuticals LLC

Category: HUMAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG LABEL
DEA Schedule: None

Adverse Reactions:

NOTE: I bolded the symptoms this woman has been having from the package insert adverse reactions section
found below.

Adverse Reactions

CARDIOVASCULAR

Bradycardia
Cold Extremities
Postural Hypotension
Leg Pain

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM

NEUROMUSCULAR

Dizziness
Vertigo
Lightheadedness
 Tiredness
Fatigue
Lethargy
Drowsiness
Depression
Dreaming

GASTROINTESTINAL

Diarrhea
Nausea

RESPIRATORY (see WARNINGS)

Wheeziness
Dyspnea
Bradycardia
Hypotension
Bronchospasm
Heart Failure
Heart Block
BBB + Major
Axis Deviation
Supraventricular Tachycardia
Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Flutter
Ventricular Tachycardia
Cardiac Reinfarction
Total Cardiac Arrests
Nonfatal Cardiac Arrests
Deaths
Cardiogenic Shock
Development of Ventricular
Septal Defect
Development of Mitral Regurgitation
Renal Failure
Pulmonary Emboli
Hypotension/Bradycardia (Low Blood Pressure)
Cardiogenic Shock
Reinfarction
Cardiac Arrest
Heart Block (> first degree)
Cardiac Failure
Arrhythmias
Bronchospasm
Hematologic: Agranulocytosis.

Allergic: Fever, combined with aching and sore throat, laryngospasm, and respiratory distress.

Central Nervous System: Reversible mental depression progressing to catatonia; an acute reversible syndrome
characterized by disorientation of time and place; short-term memory loss; emotional lability with slightly clouded
sensorium; and, decreased performance on neuropsychometrics.

Gastrointestinal: Mesenteric arterial thrombosis, ischemic colitis.

Other: Erythematous rash.

The woman we are guiding with our health sacraments decided to stop taking this medication which she had been taking for
years. Her doctor had never shown her this information or told her it existed! It is not a good business practice to show how
dangerous and toxic the product you are trying to sell to a patient is before they begin to take it, right?

Im being facetious in case you didnt notice. They, (the drug company), doesnt want you to know this information, because
you probably would not take the drug.
Many of the symptoms that the drug itself was causing her are disappearing after a week! Also, she has begun with the
Starting Procedure and working her way up to Protocol 2000 while she is with us for a month. This will detox any residual
amount of this drug that has accumulated in the body over the years as well as pathogens to restore her to health.

Below are the top 25 Prescribed drugs in the U.S. See if what you are being prescribed to take is on the list. If so, read the
information in the package insert. I included a link. YOU decide if the doctor that prescribe it for you made the right choice
for you!

The Most Popular Drugs in the United States - Primary Use

1. Hydrocodone/acetaminophen (Vicodin) pain - Pain

2. Simvastatin (Zocor) High cholesterol

3. Lisinopril High blood pressure

4. Levothyroxine sodium (Synthroid) - Hypothyroid

5. Amlodipine besylate (Norvasc) - High blood pressure

6. Omeprazole (Prilosec) - Acid reflux

7. Azithromycin (Zithromax) - Antibiotic

8. Amoxicillin - Antibiotic

9. Metformin HCL (Glucophage) - Diabetes

10. Hydrochlorothiazide - High blood pressure

11. Alprazolam (Xanax) - Anxiety

12. Lipitor (atorvastatin) - High cholesterol

 13. Furosemide - High blood pressure

14. Metoprolol tartrate (Lopressor) - High blood pressure

15. Zolpidem tartrate (Ambien) - Insomnia

16. Atenolol - High blood pressure

17. Sertraline HCL (Zoloft) - Depression

18. Metoprolol succinate (Toprol) - Blood pressure

19. Citalopram (Celexa) - Depression

20. Warfarin sodium (Coumadin) - Blood thinner

21. Oxycodone/acetaminophen - Pain

22. Ibuprofen - Pain

23. Plavix (clopidogrel) - Heart disease

24. Gabapentin (Neurontin) - Seizures

25. Singulair (montelukast) - Allergies

Below is a link to the package insert from the Drug company that produced the drug to the top 25th most popular drugs in
the U.S. CHECK IT OUT FOR YOURSELF!! I have made it easy for you to do that.

Just click on the link of the drug you are taking and read what the drug companies say themselves about the drug they
produce. You decide if you should be taking anyone of these drugs.

It is not the doctors responsibility to check out this drug, but yours! You are the one ingesting it not the doctor. You have to
dig to get to the sections:

Contraindications
Warnings and Precautions
Adverse Reactions
Drug Interactions

1. Vicodin (Hydrocodone/acetaminophen)

2. Zocor (Simvastatin)

3. Lisinopril

4. Synthroid (Levothyroxine sodium)

5. Norvasc (Amlodipine besylate

6. Prilosec (Omeprazole)

7. Zithromax (Azithromycin)

8. Amoxicillin
 9. Glucophage (Metformin HCL)

10. Hydrochlorothiazide

11. Xanax (Alprazolam)

12. Lipitor (atorvastatin)

13. Furosemide

14. Lopressor (Metoprolol tartrate)

15. Ambien (Zolpidem tartrate)

16. Atenolol

17. Zoloft (Sertraline HCL)

18. Toprol (Metoprolol succinate)

19. Celexa (Citalopram)

20. Coumadin (Warfarin sodium)

21. Oxycodone/acetaminophen

22. Ibuprofen

23. Plavix (clopidogrel)

24. Neurontin (Gabapentin)

25. Singulair (montelukast)

NOTE: You will notice that there are different package inserts from different drug companies producing the same drug so
check out the company package insert of the drug you are taking and compare to the other companies to see if they agree.

I have written this newsletter so people that are considering taking a certain drug can make an informed decision. You will
notice that the drug companies tell you to ask your doctor if a certain drug is good for you. That would be like asking a
used car salesman if this car is good for me.

99% of the time he will say, yes of course it is because he wants to sell you the car. He makes money off the car! I believe
that the person being asked or told to take a certain drug, should do his or her due diligence and see what the drug
companies say about the drug they are producing.
They are telling the world what drugs they are making and what results they are seeing from the people taking them. You
need to listen to what they are putting in print! Now, if you decide that a certain drug being prescribed for you is not good
for your health then you should have every right to deny taking it!

The Genesis II Church of Health and Healing has sacraments that can protect our temple the body, from 99% of the things
that can hurt it, i.e. toxins and pathogens. Each one of us personally needs to take responsibility for what enters our
temples. I hope everyone will research what has been written to warn us all of the dangers of many pharmaceutical products
whether they are in the form of pills, vaccines, intravenously or any other manner of entering the body!

MMS Products Are Not Medicines or Drugs

MMS is used to make chlorine dioxide, a proven pathogen killing mineral used extensively in the hygiene and
water treatment industries to destroy bacteria, viruses, pathogens and other harmful organisms in water.

The human body is 60 - 70% water.

MMS products are used in the sacraments of the Genesis II Church of Health and Healing.

The Genesis II Church of Health and Healing is non-religious; and believes that taking control of our own health is
a 'God given right' to be viewed as a 'sacrament' or 'sacred right' that each of us must freely enjoy.

Restoring Health is like a journey, and the length of your journey will depend upon the particular ailment being
dealt with, and other life style factors that may have an impact on your health.

If anyone needs help with a health issue, please feel free to contact us at: support@genesis2church.is

We are going to change the world by the 10,000s.

The Mission - Gwen Olsen - The Rx Reformer

From: GwenOlsen
Gwen Olsen spent fifteen years as a sales rep in the pharmaceutical industry working for health care giants
including Johnson & Johnson, Syntex Labs, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abbott Laboratories and Forest Laboratories.

"In Confessions of an Rx Drug Pusher, Gwen Olsen brings together the knowledge of an insider trained to sell
doctors on the merits of pills; the personal experience of having taken psychiatric medications and seen how they
altered her life; and the deep grief of having lost her niece - following her treatment with psychiatric medications -
to suicide.

This book has both an intellectual and emotional punch that readers will long remember."

- Robert Whitaker, Author of Anatomy of an Epidemic

Everyone is at risk of a prescription drug tragedy: Gwen offers an insiders knowledge of dangers from the
pharmaceutical industry.

Her poignant autobiographical journey through the darkness of mental illness and the catastrophic consequences that lurk in
medicine cabinets around the country offers an honest glimpse into alarming statistics and a health care system ranked last
among nineteen industrialized nations worldwide.
As a former sales rep for Pharma, Gwen learned firsthand how an unprecedented number of lethal drugs are unleashed
onto an unsuspecting public.

"It is easy to disregard prescription drug deaths, medical errors, and U.S. health care crisis statistics as just
numbers. However, they are not. In a well researched, impeccably documented, finely written manner Gwen Olsen
has given us account of the gripping details of real people hurt by the failures of modern health care.

A former pharmaceutical representative herself, the information is as credible as it is compelling. It is vital for those
currently taking prescription medication to read and understand this book."

- Dr. Ben Lerner, chiropractor and New York Times best selling author of Body by God

As a mental health activist, Gwen has testified before the Food and Drug Administrations Psycho-pharmacology committee,
as well as many legislative committees, and has led rallies and marches in protest against psychiatric abuse.

Gwens message is a call to action and a plea for each of us to step up and do our part to help create a medical system that
serves all and does harm to none!

"When you realize what is being sold to you as a remedy you will realize how you are playing Russian Roulette
with yours and your childrens lives. This book is a MUST read for every American and every parent in the
country."

- Meria Heller, Producer/HostThe Meria Heller Show

The Complete History Of Monsanto, The Worlds Most Evil Corporation
March 9 2016 | From: WakingTimes

Of all the mega-corps running amok, Monsanto has consistently outperformed its rivals, earning
the crown as most evil corporation on Earth!

Not content to simply rest upon its throne of death, atop a mountain of rotting corpses, it remains focused on
newer, more scientifically innovative ways to harm the planet and its people.

As true champions of evil, they wont stop until well, until theyre stopped! But what is Monsanto and how did they get to
be so obscenely evil in the first place? I think thats the best place to start this journey, so grab a few non-GMO snacks or
beverages and lets go for a ride into the deep, murky sewers of their dark past.

1901: The company is founded by John Francis Queeny, a member of the Knights of Malta, ((SMOM), which historically
has been the military arm of the Vatican) a thirty year pharmaceutical veteran married to Olga Mendez Monsanto, for which
Monsanto Chemical Works is named.

The companys first product is chemical saccharin, sold to Coca-Cola as an artificial sweetener.
Related: The Knights Templar

Even then, the government knew saccharin was poisonous and sued to stop its manufacture but lost in court, thus opening
the Monsanto Pandoras Box to begin poisoning the world through the soft drink.

1920's: Monsanto expands into industrial chemicals and drugs, becoming the worlds largest maker of aspirin,
acetylsalicyclic acid, (toxic of course). This is also the time when things began to go horribly wrong for the planet in a hurry
with the introduction of their polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).

PCBs were considered an industrial wonder chemical, an oil that wouldnt burn, impervious to degradation and
had almost limitless applications. Today PCBs are considered one of the gravest chemical threats on the planet.

Widely used as lubricants, hydraulic fluids, cutting oils, waterproof coatings and liquid sealants, are potent
carcinogens and have been implicated in reproductive, developmental and immune system disorders. The worlds
center of PCB manufacturing was Monsantos plant on the outskirts of East St. Louis, Illinois, which has
the highest rate of fetal death and immature births in the state.

Even though PCBs were eventually banned after fifty years for causing such devastation, it is still present in just about all
animal and human blood and tissue cells across the globe.

Documents introduced in court later showed Monsanto was fully aware of the deadly effects, but criminally hid them from the
public to keep the PCB gravy-train going full speed!

1930's: Created its first hybrid seed corn and expands into detergents, soaps, industrial cleaning products, synthetic
rubbers and plastics. Oh yes, all toxic of course!

1940's: They begin research on uranium to be used for the Manhattan Projects first atomic bomb, which would later be
dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing hundreds of thousands of Japanese, Korean and US Military servicemen and
poisoning millions more.
The company continues its unabated killing spree by creating pesticides for agriculture containing deadly dioxin, which
poisons the food and water supplies.

It was later discovered Monsanto failed to disclose that dioxin was used in a wide range of their products because doing so
would force them to acknowledge that it had created an environmental Hell on Earth.

1950's: Closely aligned with The Walt Disney Company, Monsanto creates several attractions at Disneys Tomorrowland,
espousing the glories of chemicals and plastics. Their House of the Future is constructed entirely of toxic plastic that is not
biodegradable as they had asserted. What, Monsanto lied? Im shocked!

After attracting a total of 20 million visitors from 1957 to 1967, Disney finally tore the house down, but discovered
it would not go down without a fight.

According to Monsanto Magazine, wrecking balls literally bounced off the glass-fiber, reinforced polyester material.
Torches, jackhammers, chain saws and shovels did not work. Finally, choker cables were used to squeeze off
parts of the house bit by bit to be trucked away.

Monsantos Disneyfied vision of the future:

1960's: Monsanto, along with chemical partner-in-crime DOW Chemical, produces dioxin-laced Agent Orange for use in
the U.S.s Vietnam invasion.
The results? Over 3 million people contaminated, a half-million Vietnamese civilians dead, a half-million Vietnamese babies
born with birth defects and thousands of U.S. military veterans suffering or dying from its effects to this day!

Monsanto is hauled into court again and internal memos show they knew the deadly effects of dioxin in Agent Orange when
they sold it to the government.

Outrageously though, Monsanto is allowed to present their own research that concluded dioxin was safe and posed no
negative health concerns whatsoever.

Satisfied, the bought and paid for courts side with Monsanto and throw the case out. Afterwards, it comes to light that
Monsanto lied about the findings and their real research concluded that dioxin kills very effectively.

A later internal memo released in a 2002 trial admitted:

That the evidence proving the persistence of these compounds and their universal presence as residues in the
environment is beyond question

the public and legal pressures to eliminate them to prevent global contamination are inevitable. The subject is
snowballing. Where do we go from here?

The alternatives: go out of business; sell the hell out of them as long as we can and do nothing else; try to stay in
business; have alternative products.

Monsanto partners with I.G. Farben, makers of toxic Bayer aspirin and Hitlers go-to chemical manufacturer that
exterminated millions with it Zyklon-B gas during World War II.
Together, the companies use their collective expertise in genocide to introduce aspartame, another extremely deadly
neurotoxin, into the food supply. When questions surface regarding the toxicity of saccharin, Monsanto exploits this
opportunity to introduce yet another of its deadly poisons onto an unsuspecting public.

1970's: Monsanto partner, G.D. Searle, produces over a hundred faked internal studies which claim aspartame to be safe,
while the FDAs own scientific research clearly reveals that aspartame causes tumors and massive holes in the brains of
rats, before killing them.

The FDA initiates a grand jury investigation into G.D. Searle for knowingly misrepresenting findings and concealing material
facts and making false statements in regard to aspartame safety.
During this time, Searle strategically taps prominent Washington insider Donald Rumsfeld, who served as Secretary of
Defense during the Gerald Ford and George W. Bush presidencies, to become CEO.

The corporations primary goal is to have Rumsfeld utilize his political influence and vast experience in the killing business
to grease the FDA to play ball with them.

A few months later, Samuel Skinner receives an offer he cant refuse,withdraws from the investigation and resigns his post
at the U.S. Attorneys Office to go work for Searles law firm. This mob tactic stalls the case just long enough for the statute
of limitation to run out and the grand jury investigation is abruptly and conveniently dropped.

Related: The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal + What Is Aspartame? Five Surprising Facts You
Never Know About This Chemical Sweetener

1980's: Amid indisputable research that reveals the toxic effects of aspartame and as then FDA commissioner Dr. Jere
Goyan was about to sign a petition into law keeping it off the market, Donald Rumsfeld calls Ronald Reagan for a favour the
day after he takes office.

Reagan fires the uncooperative Goyan and appoints Dr. Arthur Hayes Hull to head the FDA, who then quickly tips the scales
in Searles favor and NutraSweet is approved for human consumption in dried products.

This becomes sadly ironic since Reagan, a known jelly bean and candy enthusiast, later suffers from Alzheimers during his
second term, one of the many horrific effects of aspartame consumption.

Searles real goal though was to have aspartame approved as a soft drink sweetener since exhaustive studies revealed that
at temperatures exceeding 85 degrees Fahrenheit, it breaks down into known toxins Diketopiperazines (DKP), methyl
(wood) alcohol, and formaldehyde., becoming many times deadlier than its powdered form!

The National Soft Drink Association (NSDA) is initially in an uproar, fearing future lawsuits from consumers permanently
injured or killed by drinking the poison.

When Searle is able to show that liquid aspartame, though incredibly deadly, is much more addictive than crack cocaine, the
NSDA is convinced that skyrocketing profits from the sale of soft drinks laced with aspartame would easily offset any future
liability.
With that, corporate greed wins and the unsuspecting soft drink consumers pay for it with damaged health.

Coke leads the way once again (remember saccharin?) and begins poisoning Diet Coke drinkers with aspartame in
1983.

As expected, sales skyrocket as millions become hopelessly addicted and sickened by the sweet poison served in a can.
The rest of the soft drink industry likes what it sees and quickly follows suit, conveniently forgetting all about their initial
reservations that aspartame is a deadly chemical. Theres money to be made, lots of it and thats all that really matters to
them anyway!

In 1985, undaunted by the swirl of corruption and multiple accusations of fraudulent research undertaken by Searle,
Monsanto purchases the company and forms a new aspartame subsidiary called NutraSweet Company.

Related: Rumsfeld & Monsanto Team Up To Bring You Neuro-Toxic Aspartame & Splenda

When multitudes of independent scientists and researchers continue to warn about aspartames toxic effects, Monsanto
goes on the offensive, bribing the National Cancer Institute and providing their own fraudulent papers to get the NCI to claim
that formaldehyde does not cause cancer so that aspartame can stay on the market.
The known effects of aspartame ingestion are:

Mania, rage, violence, blindness, joint-pain, fatigue, weight-gain, chest-pain, coma, insomnia, numbness,
depression, tinnitus, weakness, spasms, irritability, nausea, deafness, memory-loss, rashes, dizziness, headaches,
seizures, anxiety, palpitations, fainting, cramps, diarrhoea, panic, burning in the mouth. Diseases
triggered/mimmicked include diabetes, MS, lupus, epilepsy, Parkinsons, tumours, miscarriage, infertility,
fibromyalgia, infant death, Alzheimers"

Source: U.S. Food & Drug Administration.

Further, 80% of complaints made to the FDA regarding food additives are about aspartame, which is now in over 5,000
products including diet and non-diet sodas and sports drinks, mints, chewing gum, frozen desserts, cookies, cakes,
vitamins, pharmaceuticals, milk drinks, instant teas, coffees, yogurt, baby food and many, many more!

Read labels closely and do not buy anything that contains this horrific killer!

Amidst all the death and disease, FDA stooge Arthur Hull resigns under a cloud of corruption and is immediately hired by
Searles public relations firm as a senior scientific consultant. No, thats not a joke!

Monsanto, the FDA and many government health regulatory agencies have become one and the same! It seems the only
prerequisite for becoming an FDA commissioner is that they spend time at either Monsanto or one of the pharmaceutical
cartels organized crime corps.
Related: New Study Could Spell The End For Diet Soda And Aspartame

1990's: Monsanto spends millions defeating state and federal legislation that disallows the corporation of evil from
continuing to dump dioxins, pesticides and other cancer-causing poisons into drinking water systems. Regardless, they are
sued countless times for causing disease in their plant workers, the people in surrounding areas and birth defects in babies.

With their coffins full from the massive billions profits, the $100 million dollar settlements are considered the low cost of
doing business and thanks to the FDA, Congress and White House, business remains very good. So good that Monsanto is
sued for giving radioactive iron to 829 pregnant women for a study to see what would happen to them.

In 1994, the FDA once again criminally approves Monsantos latest monstrosity, the Synthetic Bovine Growth Hormone
(rBGH), produced from a genetically modified E. coli bacteria, despite obvious outrage from the scientific community of its
dangers.

Of course, Monsanto claims that diseased pus milk, full of antibiotics and hormones is not only safe, but actually good for
you!

Worse yet, dairy companies who refuse to use this toxic cow pus and label their products asrBGH-free" are sued by
Monsanto, claiming it gives them an unfair advantage over competitors that did. In essence, what Monsanto was saying
is yeah, we know rBGH makes people sick, but its not alright that you advertise its not in your products.
The following year, the diabolical company begins producing GMO crops that are tolerant to their toxic herbicide Roundup.

Roundup-ready canola oil (rapeseed), soybeans, corn and BT cotton begin hitting the market, advertised as being safer,
healthier alternatives to their organic non-GMO rivals. Apparently, the propaganda worked as today over 80% of canola on
the market is their GMO variety.

A few things you definitely want to avoid in your diet are GMO soy, corn, wheat and canola oil, despite the fact that many
natural health experts claim the latter to be a healthy oil. Its not, but youll find it polluting many products on grocery store
shelves.

Because these GM crops have been engineered to self-pollinate, they do not need nature or bees to do that for them.

Its like having sex with yourself to make a baby. Yes, Monsanto wants to take the fun out of that too.

But all kidding aside, there is a very dark side agenda to this and that is to wipe out the worlds bee population.
Monsanto knows that birds and especially bees, throw a wrench into their monopoly due to their ability to pollinate plants,
thus naturally creating foods outside of the companys full domination control agenda. When bees attempt to pollinate a
GM plant or flower, it gets poisoned and dies.

In fact, the bee colony collapse was recognized and has been going on since GM crops were first introduced.

To counter the accusations that they deliberately caused this ongoing genocide of bees, Monsanto devilishly buys
out Beeologics, the largest bee research firm that was dedicated to studying the colony collapse phenomenon and whose
extensive research named the monster as the primary culprit! After that, its bees, what bees? Everythings just
dandy! Again, I did not make this up, but wish I had!

During the mid-90s, they decide to reinvent their evil company as one focused on controlling the worlds food supply through
artificial, biotechnology means to preserve the Roundup cash-cow from losing market-share in the face of competing, less-
toxic herbicides.

You see, Roundup is so toxic that it wipes out non-GMO crops, insects, animals, human health and the environment at the
same time. How very efficient!
Because Roundup-ready crops are engineered to be toxic pesticides masquerading as food, they have been banned in the
EU, but not in America! Is there any connection between that and the fact that Americans, despite the high cost and
availability of healthcare, are collectively the sickest people in the world? Of course not!

As was Monsantos plan from the beginning, all non-Monsanto crops would be destroyed, forcing farmers the world over to
use only its toxic terminator seeds.

And Monsanto made sure farmers who refused to come into the fold were driven out of business or sued when windblown
terminator seeds poisoned organic farms.

This gave the company a virtual monopoly as terminator seed crops and Roundup worked hand in glove with each other as
GMO crops could not survive in a non-chemical environment so farmers were forced to buy both.

Their next step was to spend billions globally buying up as many seed companies as possible and transitioning them into
terminator seed companies in an effort to wipe out any rivals and eliminate organic foods off the face of the earth.

In Monsantos view, all foods must be under their full control and genetically modified or they are not safe to eat!
They pretend to be shocked that their critics in the scientific community question whether crops genetically modified with the
genes of diseased pigs, cows, spiders, monkeys, fish, vaccines and viruses are healthy to eat. The answer to that question
is obviously a very big no way!

Youd think the company would be so proud of their GMO foods that theyd serve them to their employees, but they dont.

In fact, Monsanto has banned GM foods from being served in their own employee cafeterias.

Monsanto lamely responded we believe in choice. What they really means is we dont want to kill the help.

Its quite okay though to force-feed poor nations and Americans these modified monstrosities as a means to end starvation
since dead people dont need to eat! Ill bet the thought on most peoples minds these days is that Monsanto is clearly
focused on eugenics and genocide, as opposed to providing foods that will sustain the world.

Related: Eugenics & The Depopulation Agenda

As in Monsanto partner Disneys Sleeping Beauty, the wicked witch gives the people the poisoned GMO apple that puts
them to sleep forever.

2000's: By this time Monsanto controls the largest share of the global GMO market. In turn, the US government spends
hundreds of millions to fund aerial spraying of Roundup, causing massive environmental devastation.
Fish and animals by the thousands die within days of spraying as respiratory ailments and cancer deaths in humans spike
tremendously. But this is all considered an unusual coincidence so the spraying continues. If you thought Monsanto and the
FDA were one and the same, well you can add the govt to that sorry list now.

The monster grows bigger: Monsanto merges with Pharmacia & Upjohn, then separates from its chemical business
and rebrands itself as an agricultural company.

Yes, thats right, a chemical company whose products have devastated the environment, killed millions of people and wildlife
over the years now wants us to believe they produce safe and nutritious foods that wont kill people any longer.

Thats an extremely hard-sell, which is why they continue to grow bigger through mergers and secret partnerships.

Because rival DuPont is too large a corporation to be allowed to merge with, they instead form a stealth partnership where
each agrees to drop existing patent lawsuits against one another and begin sharing GMO technologies for mutual benefit.

In laymans terms, together they would be far too powerful and politically connected for anything to stop them from owning a
virtual monopoly on agriculture; control the food supply & you control the people!

Not all is rosy as the monster is repeatedly sued for $100s of millions for causing illness, infant deformities and death by
illegally dumping all manner of PCBs into ground water, and continually lying about products safety you know, business as
usual.

The monster often perseveres and proves difficult to slay as it begins filing frivolous suits against farmers it claims infringe
on their terminator seed patents. In virtually all cases, unwanted seeds are windblown onto farmers lands by neighboring
terminator-seeded farms.

Not only do these horrendous seeds destroy the organic farmers crops, the lawsuits drive them into bankruptcy, while the
Supreme Court overturns lower court rulings and sides with Monsanto each time.
At the same time, the monster begins filing patents on breeding techniques for pigs, claiming animals bred any way remotely
similar to their patent would grant them ownership. So loose was this patent filing that it became obvious they wanted to
claim all pigs bred throughout the world would infringe upon their patent.

The global terrorism spreads to India as over 100,000 farmers who are bankrupted by GMO crop failure, commit suicide by
drinking Roundup so their families will be eligible for death insurance payments.

In response, the monster takes advantage of the situation by alerting the media to a new project to assist small Indian
farmers by donating the very things that caused crop failures in the country in the first place! Forbes then names Monsanto
"company of the year." Sickening, but true.

More troubling is that Whole Foods, the corporation that brands itself as organic, natural and eco-friendly is proven to be
anything but. They refuse to support Proposition 37, Californias GMO-labeling measure that Monsanto and its GMO-
brethren eventually helped to defeat.
Why? Because Whole Foods has been in bed with Monsanto for a long time, secretly stuffing its shelves with overpriced,
fraudulently advertized natural & organic crap loaded with GMOs, pesticides, rBGH, hormones and antibiotics.

So, of course they dont want mandatory labelling as that would expose them as the Whole Frauds and Whore Foods that
they really are!

However, when over twenty biotech-friendly companies including WalMart, Pepsico and ConAgra recently met with FDA in
favor of mandatory labelling laws, this after fighting tooth and nail to defeat Prop 37, Whole Foods sees an opportunity to
save face and becomes the first grocery chain to announce mandatory labelling of their GMO productsin 2018! Uh, thanks
for nothing, Whore.

And if you think its peers have suddenly grown a conscience, think again. They are simply reacting to the publics outcry
over the defeat of Prop 37 by crafting deceptive GMO-labelling laws to circumvent any real change, thus keeping the status
quo intact.

To add insult to world injury, Monsanto and their partners in crime Archer Daniels Midland, Sodexo and Tyson Foods write
and sponsor The Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009: HR 875.

This criminal act gives the corporate factory farms a virtual monopoly to police and control all foods grown anywhere,
including ones own backyard, and provides harsh penalties and jail sentences for those who do not use chemicals and
fertilizers.

President Obama decided this sounded reasonable and gave his approval.
With this Act, Monsanto claims that only GM foods are safe and organic or homegrown foods potentially spread
disease, therefore must be regulated out of existence for the safety of the world. If eating GM pesticide balls is their
idea of safe food, I would like to think the rest of the world is smart enough to pass.

As further revelations have broken open regarding this evil giants true intentions, Monsanto crafted the ridiculous HR 933
Continuing Resolution, aka Monsanto Protection Act, which Obama robo-signed into law as well.

This law states that no matter how harmful Monsantos GMO crops are and no matter how much devastation they wreak
upon the country, U.S. federal courts cannot stop them from continuing to plant them anywhere they choose.

Yes, Obama signed a provision that makes Monsanto above any laws and makes them more powerful than the government
itself. We have to wonder whos really in charge of the country because its certainly not him!
There comes a tipping point though when a corporation becomes too evil and the world pushes back hard! Many
countries continue to convict Monsanto of crimes against humanity and have banned them altogether, telling them to get
the f#<k out and stay out!

Related Russia Bans All U.S. Corn And Soy Imports Due To GMO Contamination

The world has begun to awaken to the fact that the monster does not want control over the global production of food simply
for profits sake. No, its become clear by over a century of death & destruction that the primary goal is to destroy human
health and the environment, turning the world into a Mon-Satanic Hell on Earth!

Research into the name itself reveals it to be latin, meaning my saint, which may explain why critics often refer to it
as Mon-Satan.

Related: Bombshell Secret Documents Show Monsanto Knew About Glyphosate Link To Cancer Over 35 Years Ago
+ How You Can Have Yourself Tested For Glyphosate Contamination
Even more conspiratorially interesting is that Freemasons and other esoteric societies assigned numbers to each letter in
our latin-based alphabet system in a six system. Under that number system, what might Monsanto add up to? Why, of
course 6-6-6!

Know that all is not lost. Evil always loses in the end once it is widely exposed to the light of truth as is occurring now. The
fact that the Monsanto-led government finds it necessary to enact desperate legislation to protect its true leader proves this
point. Being evicted elsewhere, the United States is Monsantos last stand so to speak.

Yet, even here many have begun striking back by protesting against and rejecting GMO monstrosities, choosing to grow
their own foods and shop at local farmers markets instead of the Monsanto-supported corporate grocery chains.
The awakening people are also beginning to see they have been misled by corporate tricksters and federal government
criminals poisoned by too much power, control and greed, which has resulted in the creation of the monstrous, out-of-control
beast.

And as the people vote against that by choosing not to buy GMO poisons, Monsatans limbs continue to get hacked away
slowly but surely, driving it to its knees for the final organic sword thrust into its blackened heart.

It is this that will end its reign of terror for good!

Related: 5 Reasons Monsanto Is Crashing And Burning + 17 Countries Saying Goodbye To GM Crops & The Fight
Against Genetic Armageddon

The NWO Depopulation Agenda Is The Only Explanation Why Expensive Mainstream
Medicine Is Lethal
March 7 2016 | From: Geopolitics/ Various

When anybody doing a research on the multiple attacks against the human body, be it through our
drinking water, supposedly breathable air, or even within the pseudo healthcare medical industry
itself, the answers would then lead us to our initial conclusion that this is only about economics,
or capitalism in general, i.e.:
 Companies main concern is the bottom-line, i.e just want to extract as much profit as possible, in order to
survive the competition.

Related: Pharma marketed antidepressants to children after hiding the risk of suicide and aggression revealed by
clinical trials

But, when the researcher begins to consider the following readily observable facts:

Public services are not only unsatisfactory but is outright deadly, e.g. lead poisoning is not only happening in
Flint, Michigan, but is far more widespread than the media would like to entertain [here];

Government regulators adapting a policy of approve first, recall later in favor of a new drug that has undergone
massive clinical test manipulations, making the rich drug companies even richer as the imposed penalties later on
are not enough to bring them down but are serving only as added overhead for doing business [here, here];

that same researcher will then begin to ask far and more broader questions that will hopefully carry him to the real
answers, though uncomfortable they may be.

Such broader questions like:

How can the government regulate if the penalties for violations of its rules dont serve as deterrence for future
wrongdoings?"

"Why the welfare of the people is always the last thing to be considered?"

"Why was the bailout aimed only at rescuing the fate of the bankers and not the homeless people?"

"What would exactly happen if it was the people that was bailed out instead of the bankers, after all, it was their
bail out money to begin with?"

"Will the economy shuts down when all the bankers have gone broke?"

"Isnt it a fact that the direct exchange of goods and services came in first before the banking industry and the
illusion of wealth in money were even invented, and therefore, the people can better survive without the latter?"

"In response, why do we need to protest first before the wrongs are corrected, if it is even corrected?"

"Who, if not the government, is there left to protect the people and serve its interest at last?"

"How many can afford to file charges against these erring companies when the victim itself is systematically
robbed of his capacity to access event he barest of necessities?"

Again, these are just simple questions that cannot be answered by endlessly describing the nature of the problem
itself, as the media always do.

These are the questions that can only be answered logically by considering that perhaps the government is simply not
serving the interests of the people who, even if they are actually the ones paying for its existence, are really not in control of
the government, but only the Bankers who, as documents and scholarly studies indicate, own every other corporations on
the planet.

Heres Forbes acknowledgment and apology about the fact;

 Three systems theorists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich have taken a database listing 37
million companies and investors worldwide and analyzed all 43,060 transnational corporations and share
ownerships linking them.

They built a model of who owns what and what their revenues are and mapped the whole edifice of economic
power.

They discovered that global corporate control has a distinct bow-tie shape, with a dominant core of 147 firms
radiating out from the middle. Each of these 147 own interlocking stakes of one another and together they control
40% of the wealth in the network. A total of 737 control 80% of it all.

The top 20 are at the bottom of the post. This is, say the papers authors, the first map of the structure of global
corporate control.

The #occupy movement will eat this up as evidence for massive redistribution of wealth. The New Scientist
talked to one systems theorist who is disconcerted at the level of interconnectedness, but not surprised. Such
structures occur commonly in biology, things like fungus, lichen and weeds.

Economists say the danger comes when you combine hyperconnection with the concentration of power. The Swiss
scientists warn that this can lead to an unstable environment. No Scheisse, Sherlock.

- Forbes

And if one considers the fact that the government itself has gone from being a Republic into a mere corporation controlled
by, and serves, only the Select Few, then all the confusion as to why bad things are happening, and governments can only
offer bad behavior and decisions in spite of the fact that it is manned supposedly by the best our society could offer.

Related: Mysterious Georgia Guidestones Strange 2014 Update

The dire situation can only be properly explained if we consider all thats been laid bare by those who refuse to
take part of the greatest murder in the entire history of man, i.e.:

Every human being is reduced into a dead corpse, a corporation that seeks profit in order to survive and a virtual
slave that feeds the bigger corporation, i.e. government, with a portion of his profit, i.e. taxes;

Corporate government itself is beholden to still another bigger government, i.e. private central bank, and has to
protect all its alter egos and corporate friends, i.e. all other corporation that are serving the same generic purpose,
e.g. social engineering, population regulation;

To prevent intellectual dissent, the best minds must be assimilated into a core group of fraternities that extols
exclusivity, and therefore, superiority over the rest of our society, and will serve as the breeding ground for future
leaders that will later on occupy highest positions in all institutions of indoctrination and control, e.g. United
Nations, World Health Organization, the entire school system, the media and the entire government, effectively
feeding each of them the taste and illusion of power;

Each potential leader must be inducted into the group through an initiation process, a ritual designed to put him
in a very compromised position for easier control later on, i.e. through blackmail and other proven methods.

Indeed, it is more profitable for the bankers to expend attractive compensation and resources on just a few smart, sweet
talking crowd rousers than to care for the multitude.

But then it still much wiser to not restrict the full potential of man through the institution of paper currency to limit access to
such resources that are already provided for free by Nature. One can only wonder what level of advancements we could
have achieve if all resources were made available to the thinking man.

But all those resources are hoarded and rendered unusable by the few who consider oppression as an exercise of power
over another, and not an incapacity to understand that all things are One and the Same in Nature.
Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac for the Sociopathic Elite, and your kneeling inside their houses of worship gives them the
ultimate and godly satisfaction. Still, this is not enough.

They needed to wipe out those who will attempt to defeat their enterprise. They are actively murdering people who
understand the cancer science used in vaccines that are mandated by law and required by your own caring government.

Related: Holistic Doctors Researching Autism Detected Cancer Enzymes in Vaccines, Assassinated

The well-documented depopulation agenda, cloaked inside some benevolent sounding anti-climate change agenda, or the
upgraded Agenda 2030, as agreed upon by all United Nations member countries, is the only explanation why mainstream
medicine cant cure while being expensive and outright deadly.

Depopulation agenda is the only stupid rationale why instead of decades of advancements in the realm of science and
technology, the quality of life has instead deteriorated to its lowest levels and will continue to deteriorate because the
majority refuse to entertain a new and untried system.
Related: Agenda 2030 Translator: Decoding The UNs New Sustainable Development Goals

If they are now selling water, soon, every ounce of air will be sold in bottles, too, when the massive chemtrailing is left
unabated by passivity that is sure to worsen only by the nano-particulates that go with these government-sanctioned
operations.

The depopulation agenda can also be confirmed not just through the obvious, highly questionable behavior of our
government, yet also by looking closely at who actually wrote the doctrines being imposed by the United Nations,
particularly, the Codex Alimentarius.

Heres an extract from our eBook, Towards Healthcare Emancipation Premium Edition;

As we gain more insights into the grave dangers of genetically modified crops, fluoride, and vaccines, the impact
of this less known document which the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, through the Codex
Alimentarius Commission, wrote in 1963 will become more apparent.

Codex Alimentarius (Latin for food book) is a set of guidelines that is promoted to protect the consumers
against faulty food products and procedures. But this codex has evolved over the years to include the following
policies which will become, or is already, mandatory and binding among all members of the World Trade
Organization [WTO]:

GMO food labelling not required;

Banned pesticides, aluminium are among those deadly chemicals classified as food additives;
 Codex recommended maximum levels of chemical which are astoundingly high as opposed to the extremely low
daily recommended daily allowances for vitamins;

Dietary supplements or natural health foods are to be classified as drugs;

Codex would make vitamins and minerals illegal and not available with a prescription;

Every dairy cow is required to have Monsantos recombinant bovine growth hormone and all other animals for
food production must be treated with antibiotics, and;

All food should be irradiated

These are just among the more than 4,000 guidelines and regulations promulgated over the years regarding
everything man can possibly put into his mouth with the exception of pharmaceuticals.

While the UN-FAO may insists that codex compliance is voluntary, the World Trade Organization made it clear that
in cases of trade disputes between two countries, codex compliance takes precedence over the merits of the
case.

This clever method of the author having plausible deniability because the mandatory clause is not written in the
actual document itself while the other arm, in this case the WTO, trying to enforce it by using as the basis for
resolving disputes effectively forces each member nation to be compliant for practical purposes, is a clear
indication that both the UN and WTO are long tentacles of the same Giant Octopus that also has interests in Big
Pharma.

When a scheme is so huge, who among the maleducated, highly brainwashed members of our society could have
a chance of figuring it out? The plot thickens when you consider whose brainchild was the codex.

During the Nuremberg trial, 25 board members, executives, and chemists of the giant chemical manufacturer and
poison gas supplier to the Nazi concentration camps, IG Farben, were convicted and sent to jail, but not for long.

In 1951, they were all released and one of them proposed that if war cant solve the problem of too much people,
why not control food.

Fritz den Meer, the executive manager of IG Farben in 1943 and convicted to crimes against humanity, who
coined the phrase Arbeit Mach Frei which literally means work sets you free decorated in entrances of several
concentration camps including Auschwitz, submitted this idea to his UN pals which resulted to the creation of a
trade commission now known as the Codex Alementarius Commission. For crimes against humanity conviction, he
served a very long sentence of six years.

Another name that should be in everyones consciousness by now is Henry Kissinger, who wrote the justification to thin the
herd by saying that the population of the world has been reaching critical levels in 1974:

National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security
and Overseas Interests (NSSM200) was completed on December 10, 1974 by the United States National
Security Council under the direction of Henry Kissinger.
 It was adopted as official U.S. policy by President Gerald Ford in November 1975.[citation needed] It was originally
classified, but was later declassified and obtained by researchers in the early 1990s.

The basic thesis of the memorandum was that population growth in the least developed countries (LDCs) is a
concern to U.S. national security, because it would tend to risk civil unrest and political instability in countries that
had a high potential for economic development.

The policy gives paramount importance to population control measures and the promotion of contraception
among 13 populous countries.

This is to control rapid population growth which the U.S. deems inimical to the socio-political and economic growth
of these countries and to the national interests of the United States, since the U.S. economy will require large and
increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, and these countries can produce destabilizing opposition forces
against the United States.

It recommends that U.S. leadership influence national leaders and that improved world-wide support for
population-related efforts should be sought through increased emphasis on mass media and other population
education and motivation programs by the UN, USIA, and USAID.

- Wikipedia

These are established and verifiable facts that the guilty cannot rebut

and will worsen even further with the eventual implementation of the notorious Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement
[TPP] that no lawmakers are allowed to discuss outside the boundaries of its pages.
There are more hard evidence that we have collected and for which you may have known already, than would fit into this
article that should demand concrete action from all of us.

Related: Big Pharma Scientists Successfully Grow SARS 2.0 Virus to Protect Us

If we choose to not act today, can we therefore blame the corporate government for doing its best to make a profit by
keeping the people dumb and as pliable as could be possible?

Or, should we blame ourselves for our collective indifference to the real cause of the problems confronting the very survival
of humanity itself even at the presence of many alternative and more viable systemic and technological solutions?

Whoever else are we really waiting for before we take that first step towards our own salvation as a human species if not
that same face we always see in the mirror?
Surely, the majority have been massively indoctrinated through the mass media ever since they were born to wait for a hero
- an all too fearless, all too wise individual who will save the day and slay them all, sociopaths they are.

But hero worship has not gotten us that far, and it wont be.

We must rise as an individual awake and aware, and as a collective bonded together by our common aspirations to live in
great abundance, harmony through respect upon one another.

This is the only scenario where everyone is motivated, by default, to contribute voluntarily what one is capable of, with the
foreknowledge that honor and recognition are the only compensation and reward.

By that time, service rendered in the spirit of mutual cooperation is the only valid currency.
Together, we can drive out all that is Evil, that entity who promised us heaven only when we die, and begin creating heaven
here on Earth now that we are still breathing.

The technologies that could make this possible is already here and now, but they have been suppressed.

Related: British Medical Journal study exposes frightening facts about anti-depressant drugs & big pharma
companies

Self-Fulfilling Prophecies, And The Laws Of Appreciation And Attraction

March 5 2016 | From: HumansAeFree

Learn how to create self-fulfilling prophecies using the law of appreciation and attraction.
The universe is full of mysteries. Over the centuries, people have tried to unravel them by delving into themselves,
or taking a personal spiritual journey to discover the hidden wonders and gain wisdom.

Whereas others have delved outwards, using science and language to reflect on the mysteries and gain knowledge about
the working of the universe.

However, as we know, science and engineering both have their limits set by what the human mind is willing to perceive as
factual and so does not cater to laws that are observed only intuitively.

The famous inventor Nikola Tesla understood these shortcomings when he said:

The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all
the previous centuries of its existence."
So, today, we will introduce you to three mystical and powerful laws. These are:

1. Law of Appreciation
2. Law of Self-Fulfilling Prophecies
3. Law of Attraction

The Law of Appreciation

All of us have experienced this in our lives: that appreciation builds, expands, and eventually happily spills into every area of
our lives. Appreciation creates harmony whereas lack of appreciation simply directs us inwards towards self-consciousness,
self-depreciation, and eventually self-abandonment and destruction.

In simple words, the Law of Appreciation is this: appreciation is an attractive force; indifference, and depreciation of what
you have is a repulsive force. So, the question is, how grateful are you for what you have in life?

Lets rephrase that: Do you know what you should be and can be grateful for in your life?

Generally, most of us have allowed ourselves to be so consumed by daily events and we forget to realize, acknowledge,
and appreciate the things that we should be grateful for.

As a result, we often miss the positive things in our lives, allowing negativity to cloud our thoughts and perceptions.

However, by being grateful for something, and by showing our appreciation for what we have, we open up the space where
we experience it in abundance. We feel content and happy with what we have, and hence become synced with the
abundance the universe has to offer.

Hence, the more you appreciate something, the more you will start to have of it.

Self-Fulfilling Prophecies

Your beliefs and perceptions about yourself and the world around you, create your reality.

Sociologists call this the Pygmalion Effect, and have discovered how our regular perception, imagination, and hopes not just
impact, but also create our future.

Think of all the things you say and communicate about yourself and about your life either directly to yourself or indirectly with
the people around you.

These thoughts affect your behavior and how others perceive you, which in turn causes them to respond to you in a certain
manner, which in turn reinforces your belief about yourself, your present life, and future.

This insight is summated under the Law of Self-Fulfilling Prophecy - that the simple expectation of events or behavior that
you want to materialize, can actually cause them to happen!

Although it will not be true at that time, nor come to materialize immediately, your beliefs initiate the processes and create
the opportunities that make your beliefs come true.

Hence, your beliefs, when consistently communicated, become self-fulfilling prophecies. BUT REMEMBER, self-fulfilling
prophecies work both ways.
Positive beliefs will initiate and create a positive reality, whereas beliefs stemming from a negative mind will cause your life
to revolve around negative events.

The Law of Attraction

According to the law of self-fulfilling prophecies, your thoughts and beliefs about yourself are already creating your future.
Hence, just by rethinking the stories you are telling yourself about yourself, you can directly affect your future.

The Law of Appreciation, on the other hand, informs us of the simplest method of breaking out of the cycle of negative
thoughts and consequent actions: start appreciating the small stuff in life.

What happens when you combine both? Answer: The Law of Attraction.

This is the law that states that when you direct your thoughts towards anything positive and constructive, you tap into the
unlimited positive energy present in the universe.

And that when those thoughts are not cluttered or drained by wandering and negative thoughts, they become focused,
powerful, and capable of attracting the goodness you seek in life.

GMO's - A Planned Human Sterility Program

March 5 2016 | From: GlobalResearch

Severe health risks of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) are not new. Studies by scientists
among others in France, Germany, Austria, since at least the 1990s, pointing to several levels of
health dangers to mankind abound.
A recent study released by Egyptian researchers found that rats fed a GMO diet suffer from infertility, among other
health issues. In the US similar studies were muzzled by Monsanto and the Monsanto staffed FDA.

Related: Millions for GMO propaganda: the amount of money spent to keep you in the DARK will astound you

In a 2011 paper the Institute for Responsible Technology - IRT refers to 19 animal studies linking GMOs to mostly liver and
kidney organ disruption.

In the early 2000 the first Russian studies revealed reduction in fertility and birth defects in hamsters and rats. In a 2013
Russian study, scientist have discovered that mammals that eat GMO foodstuffs have difficulties to reproduce.
The study concluded that Campbell hamsters that have a fast reproduction rate were fed for two years with ordinary soya
beans which are widely used in agriculture and those contain different percentages of GMOs.

Another group of hamsters, the control group, was fed with pure soya [found in Serbia, as 95% of soya in the world is
transgenic].

According to Dr. Alexei Surov, who led the study on behalf of the National Association for Gene Security;

We selected several groups of hamsters, kept them in pairs in cells and gave them ordinary food as always. We
did not add anything for one group, but the other was fed with soya that contained no GMO components, while the
third group [was fed] with some content of GMOs and the fourth one with increased amounts of GMOs..

Originally everything went smoothly. However, we noticed quite a serious effect when we selected new pairs from
their cubs and continued to feed them as before. These pairs growth rate was slower, and [they] reached their
sexual maturity slowly. When we got some of their cubs, we formed the new pairs of the third generation.

We failed to get cubs from these pairs which were fed with GMO foodstuffs. It was proven that these pairs lost their
ability to give birth to their cubs."

Sterilization from GMOs is not an accident. Henry Kissinger, the protg of the Rockefeller Foundation and one of the
driving forces still today of the Bilderberg Society, not only is the author of the infamous proclamation in the early
seventies:

Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; and who
controls money can control the world;"

He also said;

Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the Third World."
This is still a (mostly unspoken) key objective of the elite, associated through different semi-secret organizations like the
Bilderbergers, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Trilateral Commission, the British Chatham House, the
Economic Forum (Davos), and others.

GMO Seeds

GMOs are based on two strands; one involves insect resistance, the other is herbicide resistant and more dangerous,
because it is glyphosate-tolerant. Glyphosate, known under its trade name Roundup, is however absorbed in the food
fibers and has devastating health effects.

The herbicide is an endocrine-disruptor, a chemical that at certain doses can interfere with the hormone system of
mammals. These disruptions may cause cancer, infertility, miscarriage, birth defects and full sterility by the third generation,
as the Russian study clearly demonstrated.

In his eye-opening 2007 book Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, F. William
Engdahl points to food control and depopulation as the strategic key objectives of GMOs as put forward by Henry Kissinger
already half a century ago.

A less populated Third World will give the US and world elite easier and cheaper access to needed raw materials, allowing
the chosen few to maintain a lifestyle of exuberant luxury and resources abuse.

Ellen Brown, referring to Gary Nulls documentary Seeds of Death: Unveiling the Lies of GMOs, quotes Dr. Bruce Lipton;

We are leading the world into the sixth mass extinction of life on this planet... Human behavior is undermining the
web of life.
Worse is to come, if and when the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement is ratified by the US and its eleven Pacific
partners. The TPP much like the TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, linking the US with the 28 EU
countries) is negotiated behind closed doors.

The chief agricultural negotiator for the US is the former Monsanto lobbyist, Islam Siddique. The two monster trade
agreements would deprive governments from regulating transnational corporations activities, to the point where the rights of
corporations would supersede sovereign nations laws.

Corporations would be able to set up private courts that may rule a country liable for lost profit due to legislation
that may interfere with their activities.

This would particularly apply to biotech agriculture. GMOs could no longer be forbidden by individual countries.

They are integral parts of the two giant trade agreements which the US is attempting to ram down the throats of their
partners and may do so in the general realm of vassalage which has been cultivated by Washingtons threat and
sledgehammer politics You are either with us or you are against us and the latter is usually punished with devastating
sanctions, if not with death of errant, non-compliant leaders.

The objective of depopulation is alive and well and being implemented under our eyes; and We, The People, are blinded
by the steady drop-by-drop of propaganda that makes us believe that these trade agreements will resolve the worlds food
problems, will eliminate famine.

What they will eliminate after a few generations is peoples fertility.

This, coupled with the constant and continuous wars on terror and financial assassinations of entire countries (see Greece)
by the so-called Bretton Woods Organizations, IMF and World Bank, working hand-in-hand with the FED and Wall Street,
may eventually succeed in drastically reducing world population if We, The People, do not wake up.
Waking up to a new form of agriculture is crucial. Back to nature and earth-friendly farming, as well as away from
globalization to the notion of local production for local consumption. Russia has a strict ban on GMOs. Russia is producing
about 40% of its food by permaculture methods on simple garden plots.

According to Natural Living, 80% of the countrys fruit and berries, and 66% of vegetables and about 50% of the nations
milk are produced on dacha-type plots.

It is not too late to get away from GMOs, from planned sterility and from depopulating the globe for the benefit of a tyrant
elite.

But, We the People, have to wake up, take back the sovereign control of our nations from the vassal leadership which
Washington has discretely, almost imperceptibly placed at the helm of the 11 TPP and the 28 TTIP nations by stolen or
manipulated elections or outright regime change.

The breaking up of the Eurozone and the European Union both of which are in dire straits might be the beginning of a
new era of self-determination.

GMO: Seeds of Death

How Big Pharma Greed Is Killing Tens Of Thousands Around The World
M arch 3 2016 | From: TheDailyMail

Patients are over-medicated and often given profitable drugs with 'little proven benefits,' leading
doctors warn.
The Queen's former doctor has called for an urgent public enquiry into drugs firms murky practices.

Sir Richard Thompson, former-president of the Royal College of Physicians and personal doctor to the Queen for 21 years,
warned tonight that many medicines are less effective than thought.

Queen's former doctor, Sir Richard Thompson, has backed new campaign

Experts calling for urgent public enquiry into drugs firms' 'murky' practices

They say too much medicine is doing more harm than good worldwide

And claim many drugs such as statins are less effective than thought

The physician is one of a group of six eminent doctors who today warn about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on
drugs prescribing.

The experts, led by NHS cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, claim that too often patients are given useless and sometimes
harmful drugs that they do not need. They maintain drugs companies are developing medicines they can profit from, rather
than those which are likely to be the most beneficial. And they accuse the NHS of failing to stand up to the pharmaceutical
giants.
Too much medicine is doing more harm than good - and costing hundreds of thousands of lives worldwide, leading experts have warned. They maintain
drugs companies are developing medicines they can profit from, rather than those which are likely to be the most beneficial

Sir Richard said:

The time has come for a full and open public enquiry into the way evidence of the efficacy of drugs is obtained
and revealed.

There is real danger that some current drug treatments are much less effective than had previously been thought.

He said the campaign highlights the often weak and sometimes murky basis on which the efficacy and use of
drugs, particularly in the elderly, are judged."

Writing for MailOnline, Dr Malhotra says commercial conflicts of interest are contributing to an;

Epidemic of misinformed doctors and misinformed patients in the UK and beyond."

Furthermore, he adds the NHS is over-treating its patients, and claimed that the side effects of too much medicine is leading
to countless deaths. And he claims the full trial data on statins cholesterol-lowering drugs prescribed to millions - has never
been published, and also points to questions about the power of Tamiflu, a drug that has cost the NHS nearly 500 million.

The group has called on Parliaments Public Accounts Committee to conduct an independent enquiry into the safety of
medicines.

They claim public funding is often allocated to medical research because it is likely to be profitable, not because it will be
beneficial for patients.
Sir Richard Thompson, former-president of the Royal College of Physicians and personal doctor to the Queen for 21 years, warned tonight that many
medicines are less effective than thought.

He is one of a group of six eminent doctors, led by NHS cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, who are concerned about the
influence of pharmaceutical companies on drugs prescribing.

Dr Malhotra said:

There is no doubt that a more medicine is better culture lies at the heart of healthcare, exacerbated by financial
incentives within the system to prescribe more drugs and carry out more procedures.

But theres a more sinister barrier to making progress to raise awareness of - and thus tackle - such issues that we
should be most concerned about.

And thats the information that is being provided to doctors and patients to guide treatment decisions."
He accused drugs companies of gaming the system by spending twice as much on marketing than on research.

Dr Malhotra says that prescription drugs often do more harm than good, with the elderly particularly at risk. One in three
hospital admissions among the over-75s a result of an adverse drug reaction, he claims.

In addition to Sir Richard, Dr Malhotra is backed by Professor John Ashton, president of the Faculty of Public Health;
psychiatrist Dr JS Bamrah, chairman of the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin; cardiologist Professor Rita
Redberg, editor of medical journal JAMA Internal Medicine; and Professor James McCormack, a pharmaceutical scientist.

Dr Malhotra, who is launching the campaign in a personal capacity, is a trustee of the King's Fund health think tank, a member
of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and advisor to the National Obesity Forum.

He is particularly critical of the dramatic recent increase of the prescribing of statins.

Dr Malhotra also points to questions about the efficacy of Tamiflu a flu drug the NHS spent 473m stockpiling. A 2014 report by a panel of eminent
experts concluded it was no more effective than paracetamol

NICE the NHS drugs rationing watchdog lowered the

threshold for prescribing statins in 2014 to encourage GPs to
prescribe the drugs to more people.
The Industry's Response
But it later emerged that six of the 12-strong panel received
funding from drugs manufacturers - either by being paid A spokesman for the Association of the
directly to give speeches or 'advice', or through funding for British Pharmaceutical Industry said:
research.

Dr Malhotra claims that the full data on the power of statins
and their side effects have never been published.
He also points to questions about the efficacy of Tamiflu a
flu drug that the NHS spent 473million stockpiling.
A 2014 report by a panel of eminent scientists concluded
that Tamiflu was no more effective than paracetamol.
Dr Malhotra also cites an investigation by the BMJ medical
journal, which earlier this month suggested that major blood
thinning drug Rivaroxaban is not as safe as its trial data
suggests, although the regulator stands by the drug.
"All medicines undergo rigorous testing for
quality, safety and efficacy by global
regulators.
The data is also subject to continuous scrutiny
during trials, once licensed and throughout the life of
the medicine, including after a patent has expired."
The spokesman added:
"The assessment of a medicine the benefits and
risks it brings to patients as well as the value it
provides to healthcare is an ongoing process.

He writes: "Innovating companies discover and develop new

uses for these medicines over the life of these
products, and regulators and health technology
assessors continue to update their assessments
based on new information.
"For the sake of our future health and the
sustainability of the NHS its time for real collective
action against too much medicine, starting with the
 Public Accounts Committee launching a full
independent inquiry into the efficacy and safety of
medicines."
Professor Ashton added:
"Public health relies on a comprehensive, accurate
and cost effective evidence base to ensure we make
decisions based on the best available research that
improve and protect peoples health, as well as
prioritise care in the best way for patients."
None of these procedures are weak or murky but
by and large published for public scrutiny.
However, we recognise that the discussion on the
evaluation of medicines is timely, and we were
pleased to contribute together with many other
stakeholders to the Evaluating Evidence policy
programme of the Academy of Medical Sciences.
This dialogue is critical to achieve a shared
constructive and progressive framework for the
assessment of medicines."

A spokesman for NHS England last night declined to

comment on the allegations.

Mailonline Exclusive: Dr Malhotra's Comments in Full...

There is no doubt that a 'more medicine is better' culture lies at the heart of modern healthcare.

This is exacerbated by financial incentives within the system to prescribe more drugs and carry out more procedures -
regardless of whether it benefits patients, it seems.

But there's a more sinister barrier to making progress that we should be most concerned about. And that's the information
being provided to doctors and patients to guide treatment decisions.

Several weeks ago I was a speaker the annual British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin medical conference in
Birmingham. Other speakers included the chair of the Royal College of General Practitioners, the chair of the BMA and the
chief executive of NHS England, Simon Stevens.

In my speech, I warned of several things that deeply concern me about the state of medicine today.

In short, these are:

Biased funding of research - funded because it is likely to be profitable, not beneficial for patients

Biased reporting in medical journals

Commercial conflicts of interests and an inability of doctors and patients to understand health statistics and risk
Over-medication is 'causing unnecessary suffering of millions and costing billions to our national economies'

All of the above are contributing to an epidemic of misinformed doctors and misinformed patients in the UK and beyond. But
most concerning of all, this desperate situation is costing tens of thousands of lives around the world.

And not only that, it is causing unnecessary suffering of millions and costing billions to our national economies.

A few months ago, the medical director of NHS England, Sir Bruce Keogh, admitted that one in seven NHS treatments -
including operations - are unnecessary and should not have been carried out on patients.

And in the US, it is estimated that one third of all healthcare activity brings no benefit to patients. This is further backed up by a
point made by former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr Marcia Angell.

In a talk given at the University of Montana, in 2009, she revealed that of the 667 new drugs approved by the FDA between
2000 and 2007, only 11 per cent were were considered to be innovative or improvements on existing medications. And three
quarters were essentially just copies of old ones.

Lining the Pocket of Big Pharma

Given the fact that drug companies' primary responsibility is to provide profit for shareholders - rather than patient health - this
is far from surprising.

But apart from the colossal financial wastage that results from companies having go at flogging a drug twice - and therefore
spending twice as much marketing drugs than they do on research and development - it's the considerable harm to patients
and the public that should concern us the most.

The Food and Drug Administration reports that adverse events from prescribed medications have more than tripled in the past
decade in the United States.
Previous research has linked psychiatric drugs to thousands of deaths due to suicides and drowsiness

This has resulted in more than 123,000 deaths in 2014 and 800,000 total serious patient outcomes - including hospitalisations
and life threatening disability.

But this is likely to represent a gross underestimate.

One person who has long been outspoken on the dangers of modern medication is Peter Gotzsche, professor of research
design and analysis at the University of Copenhagen. He estimates prescription drugs are the third most common cause of
death after heart disease and cancer.

In particular, he is deeply concerned about the impact of psychiatric drugs including antidepressants and dementia drugs.
Writing in the BMJ, he calculated they are responsible for more than half a million deaths in those aged over 65 in the US and
European union. This is due to suicides but also because patients are over-medicated and drowsy.

In fact, it is the elderly who are most at risk of so-called polypharmacy - where a patient is taking multiple drugs.

The Patients Rattling With Pills

The problem with polypharmacy is that the more drugs you take, the more likely you are to experience side-effects
that are then misinterpreted by a doctor or nurse as a symptom of disease that needs treating with additional
medicine.

I have lost count of the number of over-medicated elderly patients I have treated, with sometimes three or four blood pressure
medications making them dizzy and fall over. It's a vicious cycle and one that costs lives each year.

The elderly are particularly vulnerable to polypharmacy with one in three hospital admissions in the over 75s the result of an
adverse drug reaction. Many of these patients will fall and suffer a hip fracture because of medication side effects and a
quarter of these will die as a result.

But what is most disturbing is that Professor Gotzsche claims much of the behaviour of the pharmaceutical industry that drives
this over-prescription fulfils the criteria for 'organised crime' under US law.
'I have lost count of the number of over-medicated elderly patients I have treated, with sometimes three or four blood pressure medications making
them dizzy and fall over,' Dr Malhotra told MailOnline

Between 2007 and 2012 the majority of the largest ten pharmaceutical companies all paid considerable fines for various
misdemeanours that included marketing drugs for off-label uses, misrepresentation of research results, and hiding data on
harm.

But whether such fines act as deterrent is debatable when profit is the primary motivator.

In 2012 GSK landed a $3 billion fine - the largest healthcare fraud settlement in US history - for illegally marketing several
drugs including an anti-depressant, a diabetes drug and one for epilepsy. But in the period covered by the settlement, it posted
profits of more than $25 billion in the sales of these drugs.

Medical journals and the media can also be manipulated to serve not only as marketing vehicles for the industry but be
complicit in silencing those who call for greater transparency and more independent scrutiny of scientific data.

Take a paper published by the Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) last June.

We Don't Know the Truth About Statins

This claimed that a programme that aired in 2013 - which questioned the benefits of prescribing statins to those at low risk of
heart disease - may have resulted in up to 2,900 people suffering a heart attack or death from stopping their medication.
I was asked to go on ABC News Australia to discuss this but unfortunately just 30 minutes before my interview was cancelled.

Had I had the opportunity, I would have given my view - that the paper provided no robust evidence of increasing hospital
admissions or recorded deaths to support such claims. On the contrary, the Catalyst documentary under scrutiny is one of the
most brilliant pieces of medical journalism I have seen in recent times.

A view shared by the vice president of the faculty of public health Professor Simon Capewell, who described it as 'informative,
transparent, and raised legitimate concerns'. As he and I point out in an editorial published two weeks ago in medical journal
BMC Medicine, community based studies reveal that almost 75 per cent of new users will stop taking their statin within a year
of prescription with 62 per cent citing side effects as a reason.

In fact, the emerging evidence suggests at best, the benefits of statins have been grossly exaggerated and side effects
underplayed. In recent weeks, two separate research groups in Japan and France have, independently of each other,
questioned the reliability of many of the earlier industry sponsored studies that show the benefit of statins.

In fact the Japanese research went as far to even suggests that statins may be a cause of the increasing population burden of
heart failure.

Dr Malhotra claims emerging evidence suggests the benefits of statins have been grossly exaggerated and side effects underplayed

Meanwhile the reputed French cardiologist Dr Michel De Lorgeril has claimed all studies published after 2006 reveal 'no
benefit' of statins for cardiovascular prevention in all groups of patients.

I fully support his calls for a full reassessment of all the statin studies and until then 'physicians should be aware that the
present claims about the efficacy and safety of statins is not evidence based.' Furthermore we must demand that the Clinical
Trial Service Unit at Oxford University releases the raw data on statins for independent scrutiny.

It is these industry - sponsored studies that have resulted in the prescription of statins to millions worldwide, driving a multi-
billion industry.
The Drugs that Don't Live Up to the Hype

But back to the wider the picture. It has been just over 10 years since John Ioannidis, professor of medicine and health policy
at Stanford University, published a landmark paper explaining why most published medical research is likely to be false.

But it's not just about studies being poorly designed or stats being manipulated.

He went as far to claim 'the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true'.

Unfortunately, there are multiple recent examples exposing that our so-called guardians and regulators, NICE and the MHRA,
are not only ill-equipped to deal with these issues. Or, as the immediate past president of the Royal College of Physicians Sir
Richard Thompson told me 'are "part of the problem rather than the solution".'

NICE was called out when several leading doctors, including Sir Richard, wrote to the Secretary of State for health raising
major concerns over the impartiality of the guideline development group on statins with 8 of its 12 members declaring financial
ties to companies manufacturing statins and related drugs.

And in April 2014 independent scientists of the Cochrane Collaboration - considered the gold standard body of independent
scientists - concluded that Britain wasted more than 500 million on the influenza drug Tamiflu.

Many clinical trials have provided flawed data, argues Dr Malhotra, and patients have been incorrectly medicated accordingly

After gaining access to withheld clinical trials data, the body found Tamiflu was no better that paracetamol in relieving flu
symptoms and had potentially serious side effects including kidney problems and psychiatric disturbance.

Nice was criticised for failing to call for the full data to be released by the pharmaceutical company manufacturing the drug
before giving its hasty approval. At the time, however, manufacturer Roche said it stood behind the wealth of data for Tamiflu.
Meanwhile an investigation by the BMJ revealed that the blood clotting test device used in a trial published in the New England
Journal of Medicine was faulty giving falsely low blood thinning readings in the comparator drug warfarin.

Thus 'casting doubt onto outcomes used to support the use of the World's best-selling new oral anti-coagulant'
Rivoroxaban, the journal said.

Of course NICE wouldn't have known about the faulty device but one has to question their judgement on recommending the
use of the drug based upon one pharmaceutical company funded trial where there are now calls for the paper to be retracted.

Why We Need a Public Enquiry

The fact that prescriptions are at an all time high with more than 1 billion handed out every year - the figure has doubled in the
past decade - should be regarded as a public health crisis in itself.

Now, when a patient comes to see me with any new symptom my first thought is could this be a medication side
effect?

The system is broken and cannot be fixed by just pouring in more money. Corporate greed and systematic political failure has
brought the NHS to its knees. Without full transparency and accountability no doctor can provide what we slogged through
medical school and devote our heart and souls to - providing the best quality care for our patients.

Last week, responding to a series of recent scandals - including failure of institutions and universities in the UK to tackle
research misconduct - former editor of the BMJ, Richard Smith, wrote:

Something is rotten in the state of British Medicine and has been for a long time."

For the sake of our future health and the sustainability of the NHS it's time for real collective action against 'too much
medicine'. This can start with the public accounts committee launching a full independent inquiry into the efficacy and safety of
medicines.

I believe it is an underlying scandal that may likely to dwarf that of the Mid Staffordshire NHS scandal - where scores of
patients died due to poor care, a public enquiry concluded.

Medical science has taken a turn towards darkness. And sunlight will be its only disinfectant.
Doctors Who Discovered Cancer Enzymes In Vaccines All Found Murdered +
Vaccines, Dead Doctors, And Depopulation: If You Havent Seen This Video, You
Should
March 1 2016 | From: DCclothesline / TruthstreamMedia

Not long ago, Neon Nettle reported on the epidemic of doctors being murdered, most of which
were in Florida, U.S. The scientists all shared a common trait, they had all discovered
that nagalase enzyme protein was being added to vaccines which were then administrated to
humans.

Nagalese is what prevents vitamin D from being produced in the body, which is the bodys main defense to
naturally kill cancer cells.

According to Thebigriddle.com: Nagalase is a protein thats also created by all cancer cells.

This protein is also found in very high concentrations in autistic children. And theyre PUTTING it in our vaccines !

This prevents the body from utilising the Vitamin D necessary to fight cancer and prevent autism. Nagalese disables the
immune system. Its also known to cause Type 2 Diabetes. So basicallythey werent killing these doctors because they
had found the cure to cancer or were successfully treating autism theyre killing them because these Drs had been
researching and had the evidence that the vaccines theyre injecting our precious children with are CAUSING our current
cancer and autism crisis!

And that its obviously being done knowingly and on purpose! The Doctors they killed in Florida had been collaborating and
were getting ready to go public with the information.

Depopulation 101.. add poison to vaccines make it law that all children must be injected to attend school. Slow kill
methods. They think theyre being fair with their survival of the fittest type mentality. Only the best genes survive? These
people have no souls.
Dr. Ted Broer broke it on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report and it took them a whole hour just to get him on air because
their 3 hour show was brought down and every line they tried to use kept disconnectingand then their servers were
brought down (this video is in the following article.)

They asked a bunch of people to pray against the attack and then finally got him on a secured line.. and so a full hour into
the show they were finally back on the air and connected to Dr Broer and the first thing he said was I am in no way
suicidal.

He was super nervous holding onto this info afraid hed be taken out Hastings style before he got a chance to say it
publicly. So listen to this short clip of him breaking the story.

Its a 19 min clip but the most important info is heard within the first 10 min. It is definitely some of the most important news
Ive ever heard. And it needs to go viral (see below).

Related: Australian Governments no jab, no pay Law Sparks Run on Vaccines

Vaccines, Dead Doctors, And Depopulation: If You Havent Seen This Video, You
Should
Autism has now skyrocketed to ONE IN 45 in the US. That means if you walked down your street
right now, its highly likely you wouldnt even have to go a full block before you will have passed a
home with at least one autistic child living in it.

What you are about to hear may be why.

When the CDC Whistleblower story broke in the fall of 2014, the Establishment quickly went to work to black it out and cover
it up. Regardless, its on record that a government epidemiologist admitted he and his cohorts massaged and omitted
data in a study to hide a huge increase in autism following MMR vaccination.

He then promptly lawyered up with one of the most high profile whistleblower attorneys money can buy in this country
and issued a statement. Then the whole thing got swept under the rug in what appears to be a purposefully overblown ebola
scare and forgotten by many.

Fast forward to last summer, when a bunch of doctors began turning up dead around the country under mysterious
circumstances. Some twelve doctors died within three months and many were found under suspicious circumstances (such
as randomly out in the woods or suffering sudden heart attacks even though they were young and in otherwise great health).
Authorities quickly ruled some of the deaths suicides seemingly without even really investigating the circumstances
surrounding the death. Some of the doctors were linked to each other through their research.

These dead doctors all seem to have one thing in common: They were studying the effects of GcMAF and/or
nagalase in regards to cancer patients or links in children with autism.

Well get to what exactly those two things are in a moment.

One of the more high profile murders was that of Dr. James Bradstreet, whose body was discovered floating in a North
Carolina river, a single gunshot wound to his chest (via Natural News):

Bradstreet, a renowned physician known for his skepticism of immunizations (particularly the MMR vaccine), and
his progressive autism research, was raided by the FDA one week before his mysterious death. The details of
the raid remain largely unknown.

Personally affected by autism, as both his son and stepson were diagnosed with the condition, a significant portion
of Dr. Bradstreets work was dedicated to this cause. He even testified twice before the U.S House of
Representatives about the link between vaccines and autism.

As Natural News reported, leading up to his death, Dr. Bradstreet was working with a little-known molecule that
occurs naturally in the human body. GcMAF (Globulin component Macrophage Activating Factor), which is the GC
protein after it combines with vitamin D in the body, has the potential to be a universal cure for cancer."

As we all know, cancer is big business in this country. Were talking about a 124 billion dollar industry. A number that big is
naturally a matter of national security. One of our countries biggest products is cancer, so why anyone believes the system
would ever allow a cure is beyond me.

As such, it should come as no surprise information about groundbreaking research on GcMAFs cancer-fighting ability has
not been widely distributed. In fact, we didnt learn about it at all until doctors started dying for researching it.

While those who worked with it claimed it has reversed autism and cured cancer in studies (studies which had to be kept on
the low down), consider this on the flip side: if the body is somehow inhibited in any way from producing GcMAF, the
persons immune system is utterly compromised, allowing for all manner of diseases.

Related: Watch As Amazing GcMAF Treatment Kills Cancer Cells In Real Time

This compound (or lack thereof) is linked to autism, cancer, diabetes, you name it. Without the bodys ability to produce
GcMAF, a person is set up to get sick and eventually die.

An enzyme called nagalase excreted by cancer cells (and which is also a component in the envelope protein of viruses like
HIV and influenza) is known to inhibit the bodys production of GcMAF.

Dr. Bradstreet et al. had all discovered in one way or another that nagalase is compromising the immune systems of people
with autism and cancer etc. by inhibiting their bodies from producing GcMAF, but

Heres the bombshell: many of these dead doctors believed nagalase was being PURPOSEFULLY ADDED to the
vaccines.

Why? Population control.

If you havent heard about this, you have to listen to this 19 minutes of an interview with Dr. Ted Broer on Hagmann &
Hagmann.

The full interview can be found here. The interview didnt even happen for the first hour because the site kept having
mysterious technical difficulties while the show was on and the doctor kept getting disconnected. He begins by letting the
audience know he is not suicidal.

Via Dr. Broer in this interview:

This information Im about to give you right now is extremely controversial and a bunch of people have
exited the planet who were working with it.

This information has been around for awhile. They knew the information they were working with and they were
basically being very, very careful, supposedly and some of them were being accused of using GcMAF, and the
 Food and Drug Administration apparently raided several of their offices several weeks before they committed
suicide or suddenly died.

Its going to sound complicated, but Im going to break this down for everybody super, super easy tonight. When
you first hear these terms theyre going to sound weird to you

GC protein is a protein in the body that is used by macrophages in the body. What it does is, macrophages in the
body are the ones that kill cancer cells, they stop cytokines storms and can be involved in cytokines storms, well
explain all these terms in a few minutes.

Macrophages in the body are the ones that kill cancer cells. They stop cytokine storms the GC protein in the
body adds vitamin D to it How many times have I told the listeners you have to take vitamin D every day? Thats
super important.

Remember GC protein gets vitamin D added to it and the GC protein becomes whats called GcMAF (Gc protein-
derived macrophage activating factor) This GcMAF protein is human immune system enzyme protein also
known as vitamin d binding protein

This GcMAF is probably the single most effective thing in the immune system to kill cancer cells

and whats happening is, the immune system is being compromised by a product called nagalase."

Again, when GcMAF is inhibited, it compromises a persons entire immune system. Period.

What these doctors found was this that this nagalase protein enzyme they felt was being introduced
into the body either virally or directly through immunizations. This is the enzyme protein that destroys the
immune system.

Im going to repeat this. Apparently since these guys are dead and I cant talk to them. They have found that the
nagalase enzyme protein that was made by cancer cells and viruses which causes immunodeficiency is being
added through the immunizations either through viruses or through the immunization itself being given nagalase.

This is such incredibly damning information to the entire medical profession and the immunological profession and
those folks that [sic] are producing immunizations, that apparently they didnt want these guys around.

Im not saying what happened to these guys, Im just saying theyre not on this planet anymore. (Read more on this
story at Natural News here and here.)"

Nagalase was, surprise surprise, being found in very high concentrations in children with autism. Nagalase testing is also
done for cancer, AIDS, and other chronic infections.

Nagalase is like a stealth bomber. The nagalase enzyme synthesized in or released from cancer cells or a virus
particle pinpoints the GcMAF protein facilities on the surface of your T and B lymphocytes and simply wipes them
out with an incredibly precise bomb."

Dr. Broer goes on to talk about how GcMAF given to autistic children has completely erased their symptoms. That
it has cured cancer. Alzheimers. The list goes on and on.

So, to sum it up, nagalase inhibits GcMAF, a lack of which compromises the immune system, and nagalase is linked to
autism, cancer, and all manner of diseases, and the dead doctors had reportedly all figured out in one way or another that
nagalase was purposefully being added to our vaccines as slow kill.
Thats the theory. Think about that for a second. Let it sink in.

And were told were horrible monsters if we dont shoot our kids up with massive doses of vaccines because they might get
measles.

The United States has the most aggressive vaccination schedule on the planet, and yet, they have one of the highest rates
of infant mortality, autism is skyrocketing year after year, cancer is one in three for women and one in two for men, and
pretty much every disease you can think of is on the rise there.

While the vaccine link to autism has been widely discussed in alternative circles as the incidences of autism have risen
sharply over the past decade, many know theres a connection but are unsure of just precisely how it works.

Is it the heavy metals? The genetically engineered DNA? The barrage of chemicals, including polysorbate which acts as a
detergent to help the chemicals in vaccines cross the blood-brain barrier more easily?

Or is the answer much, much simpler?

Is it the addition of a known immune-system inhibiting enzyme that leaves all of us and our children immune compromised
from birth and essentially set up to get sick and die?

Depopulation 101 add poison to vaccines make it law that all children must be injected to attend
school. Slow kill methods. They think theyre being fair w/ their survival of the fittest type mentality. Only
the best genes survive? These people have no souls." (source)

We could ask a dozen doctors what they think about that theory, but theyre all dead.

In the meantime, Dr. Broer suggests everyone take Vitamin D3 every day.

Man this world is so beyond screwed up.

And look, heres a vaccination commercial now:

Dr. Kenneth Stoller: Vaccines Are Poisoning Children, American Pediatric Assoc. Knows It

Dr. Stoller withdrew his membership from the American Pediatric Association due to the Associations involvement in injuring
children with vaccines.

That Vitamin Movie

February 29 2016 | From: AivahWerner / ThatVitaminMovie

Healing yourself with vitamins.

This summer I attended a talk given by an orthomolecular physician for parents of children with Trisomy 21 and
afterwards spoke with him one on one. It came up in discussion that a family member of his had cancer and was
healed using high dosage intravenous vitamin C.

Related: Clive de Carle: How You Can Restore Your Health, Enabling Your Body To Self-Repair From Virtually Any
Disease Or Affliction

Knowing how effective this is in healing cancer since Ive done quite a bit of reading on this topic in the past, the good
results were predictable. My big question was, how was he able to have this protocol used with his relative!

He told me that it helps being a physician. Unfortunately Im not a physician but at least I now know someone in Israel
who has used this tool!

In a new documentary titled That Vitamin Movie, the message is about the efficacy of vitamins in maintaining health and
healing illness.
The person who made this documentary began his journey of exploration of this topic when a friend of his was helped with
depression by changing his diet and getting supplements. As he researched, he found more and more stories of
those recovering with help of large doses of vitamins much larger than the daily recommended amounts.

The approach of conventional medicine is to treat the symptoms, not to get to the root of what is causing the problem. I
regularly ask the doctors or dentists that I take my children to why they are having the issue we are there for, and Ive
consistently been told: Thats the way it is. Sometimes this happens.

The response is to prescribe medication, surgery, dental work. But the question remains, why is the problem happening? If
you dont address the root issue that the symptoms are stemming from, youll continue to see health issues coming up. And
if you go the route of medication, often the side effects of one medication lead to the need for the prescription of another,
and so on.

It was to explore some of these questions that this man said he set out to interview some of the worlds vitamin experts.
Dr. Andrew Saul commented in the beginning of his film that he raised his children to college without antibiotics and says
very few people can say that but I can! I only have three children of college age, but 2 of the 3 havent had any
antibiotics. The third had them twice.

Ds16 was treated with antibiotics when he had a hip infection (I wished at the time I had access to high potency intravenous
vitamin C because we werent able to give high enough doses orally of vitamin C to counter the infection), and other than
ds3, the others havent had any. Bli ayin hara.

By the way, this was an issue for a potential shidduch once. The other side found out that we prefer to use natural antibiotics
rather than prescription drugs to deal with illness and this was problematic for them. I had to explain to the shadchan that
were not dogmatic about this, and that although we have used medications at time, weve found this approach most
effective to help our family stay healthy.

I think if people understood how much research there was on the use of vitamin C alone and read even a fraction of this,
they wouldnt see the use of it as extreme but rather as logical and self-apparent why it would be the preferred approach.

(While vitamin C is repeatedly mentioned in this film, its not the only supplement recommended. However, almost six years
ago I wrote a detailed post with specifics of how to dose vitamin C and if youre interested you can read it here.)

This film is a consciousness raising of the benefits of using vitamins for the average person. Vitamins can be amazingly
effective in treating a huge spectrum of issues: some of those referenced by the experts in this film include depression,
cancer, heart disease and ADHD. Though Im familiar with all the information shared, Im feeling prompted to mentally dust
off that knowledge and be more conscientious about applying it.
TEDx: The Wireless Wake Up Call
February 28 2016 | From: EMFAnalysis

Jeromy Johnson just gave the first-ever TED Talk on wireless / EMF / smart meter health effects.
And it's a real eye-opener.

Jeromy has a Master's degree in Environmental Engineering. As a Silicon Valley tech-enthusiast, he was the last
person to expect the debilitating health effects he experienced when 'smart' meters were installed where he lived.
There are now thousands upon thousands of others just like him.
Related: Wi-Fried?

The other major video of the week is a doc called WI-FRIED?, produced by ABC Australia.

It's excellent. And it's stirred up, predictably, the hornet's nest of deniers within industry. This prompted a fiery rebuttal from
ABC Producer Maryanne Demasi on Huffington Post.

Related: Sometimes Asking Questions Provides You With Answers That May Be Uncomfortable

One thing is fore sure... the conversation is going mainstream.

Protect Your Family from EMF Pollution: TEDx Talk: Wireless Wake-Up Call

On February 6th, I had the opportunity to speak at TEDxBerkeley. The title of my talk was Wireless Wake-Up Call. I
discussed the health effects related to the explosion in wireless technology the past few years, along with solutions that can
help everyone. Within the presentation, I also talked about how we can develop technology that is much safer for humanity.
Here is the video:

The following are a few pictures and experiences from that day:

Zellerbach Hall on the UC Berkeley campus is an incredible venue. It seats 2,000 people and this event was sold-out. I was
the second speaker of the day and the first couple minutes on stage were a bit nerve-racking. As you will see in my opening
questions, there was an uncomfortable moment for everyone (it felt like the entire room needed to pause).

It happened when I asked who knew that the fine print in every smart phone owners manual says to never put the phone
within about 1 inch of the body. This is a truth that is currently taboo to discuss in our society, so few people know about it.
However, once we got through this moment, the talk soon became fun and was well-received by many in the audience.
TEDxBerkeley hired artists to put each talk into images. It is such an incredible skill to do this in a short amount of time.
Every speaker that day gave an amazing talk (it was so much fun to watch the other talks) and each presenter was given
the painting of their talk as a gift that evening.
In my talk, I wanted to convey that people are indeed being harmed by this technology and that there is adequate science to
show how and why this is happening. Most importantly though, I provided solutions that every family can utilize today to
reduce their exposure and encouraged us all to help society wake-up.

Once this happens, our technology industries will create safe products that will move our entire society toward a healthier
future.

The Man Who Discovered The Cause Of Cancer Wrote A Book On Curing It
February 27 2016 | From: HealthyWildAndFree

Dr. Otto Warburg was the man who discovered the cause of cancer, he was awarded the nobel
prize in 1931 for his work.
Initially it was my understanding that he discovered cancer but he actually discovered the cause which in my
opinion is even more valuable than discovering cancer.

Many people have recognised a problem, a disease, a tumorous lump growing on someone and labeling it a disease. The
cause of that disease is even more important and relevant than the disease itself if you want to do something about it.

His work came to be known as the Warburg Effect or the Warburg Hypothesis which basically entailed that cancer cells
live off sugar (glycolysis) and that they also thrive in an anaerobic environment.

These causes led me to believe the opposite would help to reverse the cancer growth. What do you think?

Hes one of the most relevant figures in our history when it comes to cancer, what causes it and how to really treat it. Most
people have no idea who this man is though, why is that? is it because of what he has to say about cancer and about
disease in general? Theres no question that he was a brilliant man during his time.
The first man to discover the cause of cancer is somewhat like the first man landing on the moon! its just the micro and
macro scale of things.

His discovery led him to certain conclusions. These conclusions that he was led to may be true or false to you but im going
to leave that up to you to decide. I trust this man (the discoverer of it) more than the American Cancer Society or any other
medical organization though because hes worked to get to a place of excellence and understanding of cancer.

Large organisations that take your money for a cure or to walk around in a circle wearing pink shirts havent done
a whole lot with the BILLIONS of dollars poured in for research.

Oddly enough Dr. Otto Warburg gave his two cents on what can be done to treat and heal cancer and what changes need to
take place in the human body for the human body to no longer have cancer.

Let me say that again! the man who discovered cancer shared practical information on how cancer can cease to
exist based on his understanding of cancer in his research.

So what was his thoughts on cancer? First, he was quoted as saying:

His first belief was that cancer itself cannot exist in an alkaline environment.

What conclusion could you draw from this? Foods and drinks that are alkaline are beneficial for helping to remove cancer
from the human body. From his research his conclusion was that cancer can not live in an alkaline environment.

If you have cancer then wouldnt it be a natural conclusion to put alkaline foods and drinks such as water into your body as
much as possible as opposed to acidic foods which may in fact feed the cancer growth? Its just a thought.

Beyond this Dr. Otto Warburg also said

Cancerous tissues are acidic, whereas healthy tissues are alkaline. Water splits into H+ and OH- ions, if there is
an excess of H+, it is acidic; if there is an excess of OH- ions, then it is alkaline.
 All normal cells have an absolute requirement for oxygen, but cancer cells can live without oxygen a rule without
exception. Deprive a cell 35% of its oxygen for 48 hours and it may become cancerous.

Dr. Warburg has made it clear that the root cause of cancer is oxygen deficiency, which creates an acidic state in the human
body.

Dr Warburg also discovered that cancer cells are anaerobic (do not breathe oxygen) and cannot survive in the presence of
high levels of oxygen, as found in an alkaline state.

Dr. Wargburg understood the importance of oxygen and an alkaline environment around the cancerous growth. He even
went so far as to say that No Disease, including cancer can live in an alkaline environment too.

So from Dr. Warburg some of the best cancer and disease prevention (and healing, according to him) advice would be to
give your boxy more oxygen and an alkaline environment.

How do you do that? More deep breathing. More nature. If you live in the city you are being bombarded by chemicals and
decreasing oxygen levels. The country and nature have higher levels of pure oxygen and this was one of the keys according
to Dr. Warbug to help the body be in an alkaline environment.

Not only that but eating alkaline foods such as vegetables and fruits can help to alkalize the body environment as well.

Believe it or not Dr. Otto Warburg also wrote a book entitled Cancer: Its cause and its Cure which blows my mind. I
recommend listening to the recent interview on my podcast with Ty Bollinger as well as reading the Top 6 Cancer
Prevention Foods.

Related: The Truth About Cancer

River Stance: Water Pollution In New Zealand

February 26 2016 | From: Listener

Ecologist Mike Joys unsanitised views of the sorry state of our fresh waterways make him a target
of vitriol. But hes not about to change his tune.

The cool water flowing around Mike Joys legs looks clear and clean. If it wasnt for a stiff southerly blasting over
the Canterbury Plains and across the bed of the Selwyn River, it might even look good enough for a quick dip.

Related: Horowhenua Horowhenua pensioner bashed in late night attack after highlighting pollution of waterways to
Council - not the first such incident

But looks deceive. If the pollutants that leach through our intensively farmed soils and into lowland rivers such as the Selwyn
made the water run red, wed quickly grasp the scale of the problem, says Joy. Instead, the water at Coes Ford a spot
where he spent blissful days as a Christchurch schoolboy in the 1960s and 70s, and where he now stands as one of New
Zealands loudest environmental whistleblowers is polluted by invisible toxins.
Its high in nitrogen, which fuels the growth of slime and algae, and there are regular spikes of E coli, meaning the swimming
water quality is ranked as poor.

Trout used to run in their tens of thousands up this stretch of the river. Christchurch anglers could knock off after a days
work and half an hour later be casting their lines into a fishery that rivalled the fabled Turangi. But these days Fish & Game
rangers count just dozens of trout.

In the middle of the river bed theres a tell-tale black streak. Its Phormidium, says Joy. The naturally occurring algae
thrives in rivers that have been altered by vegetation clearance and enriched by excess nutrients. It can quickly grow into a
toxic mat across an entire river bed.

Related: A Former Councillor Speaks Out: Toe the line and deny any pollution by the HDC was the clear message
given by Mayor

Within a fortnight of the Listener photographing Joy here, Environment Canterbury had issued a fresh alert warning people to
stay away from the site, reporting significant quantities of the potentially toxic algae, which can cause rashes, nausea,
cramps, tingling and numbness around the mouth and fingertips.

And which can kill. There are instances in New Zealand of dogs dying after drinking contaminated river water and licking
algae-covered rocks. It seems it will only be a matter of time before a child dies after ingesting some of this, Joy predicts.
Typical Joy focusing on the negatives, looking past the postcard images of crystalline alpine rivers to shout about the ailing
state of streams that flow through farmland, publicly undermining our clean green image.

He became a household name three years ago after he was quoted in the New York Times on the eve of the release ofThe
Hobbit saying the pristine environment portrayed in the film was at odds with this countrys poor showing against many
international benchmarks.

Previously, an article hed written saying that New Zealand was delusional about its environmental performance was used
to embarrass Prime Minister John Key in a high-profile interview with the BBCs Stephen Sackur.

After the New York Times story, political lobbyist Mark Unsworth emailed Joy, accusing the Massey University ecologist of
economic sabotage and describing him and his cohorts as the foot and mouth disease of the tourism industry.

Most ordinary people in NZ would happily have you lot locked up, he wrote.

Political activist Cameron Slater blogged that Joy ought to be taken out and shot at dawn for his treachery.

[Comment: Oh how the truth hurts. And shoot the messenger?]

The New Zealand Herald accused Joy of overstatement, and scolded that his damaging analysis had reached an
international audience. When challenged by Sackur, Key shrugged off Joys critique as merely a view that could be easily
countered by other scientists, and insisted that for the most part its possible to jump into any New Zealand river for a
swim.

Looking back on the backlash, Joy says he was hurt but undeterred. For every one Unsworth, there are 20 people who -
randomly email me or ring me and thank me for what Im doing.
A $1.27m clean-up to reverse environmental damage in Levins Lake Horowhenua began in 2014. The Listener had labelled it a lake of shame in
2013 when it was ranked 107th out of 114 lakes for water quality. Photo/Hagen Hopkins

The Way He Sees It

Hes carried on putting his head above the parapet, increasingly abandoning the language of academic restraint to tell the
story of what he sees as an environmental crisis. In the past two years alone he has delivered 102 public talks to
environmental, farming, community and school groups. And this month, he has published the story in a long essay, Polluted
Inheritance.

Referencing monitoring reports and studies that normally lie beyond the public gaze in scholarly journals and the archives of
regional councils, Niwa and other crown research institutes (CRIs), the essay is effectively a Mike Joy state of the
environment report one that paints a far bleaker picture than the official version published a month ago by the Ministry for
the Environment.

Of 112 monitored lakes, a 2010 Niwa study found 44% are eutrophic so burdened by excess agricultural nutrients that they
have become murky, smelly and inhospitable to many fish, reports Joy. Almost all (90%) our lowland wetlands the kidneys
of our waterways have been destroyed.
Three-quarters of our native freshwater fish are threatened with extinction (up from 20% in the early 1990s), yet only one
the grayling, which has been extinct for decades has legal protection.

Digging through the data on more than 300 monitored river sites, he reports that more than two-thirds of those surrounded by
farmland exceed Australasian guidelines for nitrogen levels in water, beyond which aquatic life starts to be affected.

Thats up from 40% in 1990. Phosphorous the other key agricultural pollutant, carried into rivers by soil erosion exceeds
guidelines in most intensively farmed areas (although levels have been slowly falling since the late 1990s).

And then there are the tiny creatures whose presence signals the well-being of rivers invertebrates such as mayflies and
stoneflies, which are measured by the Macroinvertebrate Community Index (MCI).
Niwa has mapped MCI scores around the country, painting in red where low insect life denotes serious pollution: the map
burns bright red throughout the intensively farmed regions of Canterbury, Southland, Auckland, Waikato and Taranaki.

Weve squandered our environmental riches, argues Joy, and ended up with a pattern of degradation that places an
inequitable burden on the poorest communities.

Yes, the pristine rivers and lakes still exist, but they are largely in national parks where people with time and money to drive
or fly long distances can enjoy them, whereas the worst effects of intensive agriculture are concentrated in lowland rivers and
estuaries close to where people live places which, in the past, have been available to those with limited income for food
gathering and cheap recreation.
Mike Joy inspects Phormidium on the gravel bed of the lower Selwyn River, in Canterbury. The felt-like algae can quickly take over a river bed, and
can be toxic to animals and humans. Photo/Martin Hunter

Dairy Boom

How has it come to this? Farmers, claims Joy, have been incentivised to pollute. The dairy-cow population has doubled
since 1992 without there being regulation controlling the volume of nutrients and pathogens that flow from their free-range
excrement through the soils and into waterways.

This intensification has been enabled by new inputs such as palm-kernel expeller (PKE) and a 420% increase in nitrogen
fertiliser use since 1990, leading to stocking rates than wouldnt otherwise be possible. The ability of catchments to absorb
the effects has simply been overwhelmed.
Twenty-five years after the dairy boom began, the Government has belatedly written environmental bottom line standards
for freshwater into the rule book. But in Joys view (one shared by many others in the freshwater field), the proposed limits
are so weak they would allow for further pollution, and crucial measures of aquatic health, such as the MCI index, have been
left out altogether.

The underlying problem, he says, is that those who pollute dont pay to clean up the damage. Instead, the cost falls on the
public in the form of a degraded environment and lost opportunities.

In his most controversial offering yet, earlier this year he co-authored a paper (with masters student Kyleisha Foote and
Massey University colleague Russell Death) that extrapolated from a raft of published research on the cost of environmental
clean-ups to conclude that if the pollution caused by the dairy industry was properly accounted for it would exceed the
industrys total economic value.

The farming sector was scandalised, and academics including Waikato Universitys Jacqueline Rowarth and Frank
Scrimgeour criticised Joy and his colleagues for naivety and sloppiness.
It's not our fault bro, all we did was turn up

But if it confirmed Joys reputation as a stirrer and a troublemaker for the dairy industry, it seems not to have affected his
standing with New Zealands biggest farmer, Landcorp. Suddenly, Joy just three years ago condemned as a traitor and
saboteur has found himself inside the room with the leaders of the most influential agri-business in the country. How did
that happen?

Landcorp chief executive Steven Carden says the strategy of the state-owned enterprise is to achieve both an economic
return and environmental sustainability. Joy is one of six paid members of an environmental reference group to advise it on
how to achieve that. We thought we could take the safe path of finding experts who would tell us what we wanted to hear, or
we could challenge ourselves and bring in people who are outspoken on the environmental impacts of dairying.

Other group members include veteran environmentalist Guy Salmon, innovative farm consultant Alison Dewes and maverick
water campaigner and businessman Angus Robson. Carden says debate in the first couple of meetings was ferocious, but
the search now is for farming solutions that will work. We will listen to them Its not a green stamp.

On The Inside

Inside the room being listened to by influential people is a surprising place to be for a late-starting scientist who still sees
himself as an outsider. Joys academic career didnt begin until he was 33. He ditched school at 17, by which time his
policeman fathers job had taken the family from Christchurch to Wellington. He was academically average and a bit of a
bogan. I was a hoon at school, always off chasing girls at lunchtime.
 His first job was in a bottle recycling factory in Petone. It
was rough as guts. I went from school to a full-time job
there employing people coming out of jail, overstayers
I became the foreman at 17, running these guys driving
trucks and forklifts.

He moved to Palmerston North in pursuit of a girlfriend and

got a job on a 65-cow dairy farm, which he ended up
managing. I loved it loved the cows and the job.

He moved on through a succession of jobs labouring,

truck driving, building. He did a stint driving taxis all night
and spending his days doing up a 100-year-old yacht.

He bought an empty section up 74 council steps in the

Wellington suburb of Wadestown and built a kitset house on
it, which is still there.

He and his partner, Allie Hewitt, sailed across the Pacific to

Tonga, and later found work on a remote outback farm in
Australia.

The place was owned by two estranged brothers who lived

at opposite corners of the 40,000ha property, and it hadnt
seen rain for four years.

We killed 6000 ewes, recalls Joy. The farmers had $2 a

head in their wool fund to get rid of them. The market was
shot. At night, he and Hewitt would go spotlighting for
kangaroos, legally, to sell for dog tucker, which brought in
enough cash for the farm to pay their wages.

When they returned to New Zealand in 1993, jobs were

scarce, and both decided to enrol at Massey. By the third
year Joy was enrolled in Deaths freshwater ecology
lectures, and he became immersed in the field of
biomonitoring using animals as a measure of ecological
health.
Dogs are known to have died after contact with the algae on the Hutt
River and the Ashley in North Canterbury

That interest became the basis for a PhD using artificial intelligence to develop predictive models of fish populations, drawing
on a raft of environmental variables including climate and geology.

The models describe, with a high level of accuracy, the freshwater fish communities that ought to be present in any given
spot, which can then be used as the benchmark from which to identify the reasons the actual population may be depleted.
The work was published internationally and, according to Death, was globally ground breaking.

Up to this point, Joy had no particular concerns about farming or the effect of land use on water.

I was a fan of farming. Id been a farmer. But that started to change.

It was so frustrating, day after day, going to streams, setting up kit and finding the same old suspects the three
species that can handle any conditions instead of the 20 species that ought to have been there. At hundreds of
sites, all you ever found were upland bullies and short-finned eels and a few trout.

He started getting angry at the degradation he was seeing. Then he got angry about the failure of regulators to act on it.

Headline-Grabber
Fifteen years on, that anger has driven Joy onto the podium and into the media with a frequency and stridency that have
attracted both respect and resentment from his peers.

University of Otago ecologist Marc Schallenberg, president of the Freshwater Sciences Society, says for the most part Joy is
simply reporting on publicly available data, and the message hes putting out there is right.

Schallenberg says in his own field work on lakes and estuaries he sees the same decline in water quality that Joy describes,
and the cause:

Couldnt really be anything else [other than agriculture], unless there is a climate-change signal that none of us
has picked up yet But when you see whats going on the land and the sheer amount of waste thats put onto the
land its not rocket science.

But he says most scientists have no appetite for the advocacy role Joy has assumed.

Scientists often are dispassionate people because part of our training is really just to look at the data and not get
passionately involved in any particular outcome or finding

[Joy] has taken a lot of flak and thats one of the reasons some of us would be reticent. But I appreciate what he
does, and more than anyone he has brought these issues into the public perception.
Given whats at stake for New Zealands agricultural economy, Schallenberg says theres a tendency among vested interests
to spin the environmental data;

So you need people to come out and call a spade a spade and engage with the misinformation thats out there.
Im quite grateful that Mike is that person for us.

Waikato University ecologist Kevin Collier vouches for Joys scientific credentials and says the message he communicates
resonates with him.

But people make contributions in different ways. Some are more comfortable doing the science through more
conventional means and some are more comfortable being a bit more outspoken. Certainly Mike has taken a lot of
hits where other people would have given up because it was too hard.

Others are affronted by Joys methods. He has come out swinging against scientists from Niwa (the agency whose
monitoring data he widely cites), accusing them, in the midst of the stoush over the proposed Ruataniwha irrigation scheme
in Hawkes Bay, of providing advice on nutrient limits in the Tukituki River that was biased in favour of the client:

If you were working for Niwa and all your work came from these councils or the Ministry for the Environment
Youve got to feed the kids and pay the mortgage. Are you going to say its a bad idea?

Joy had breached a cardinal rule of scientific decorum dont slag off your peers in public. The Hawkes Bay Regional
Council strongly rejected his comments, and Niwa rejects the allegations as well. Ill-feeling between Joy and the CRI
remains. When the Listener approached John Quinn, Niwas chief scientist (freshwater and estuaries) for comment on Joy,
he politely refused.

The behaviour we would like to see is where we talk about each others work in the context of [conferences and
personal communications], not in the media

Having public spats is not helpful for the credibility of science.

Waikato Universitys Professor David Hamilton, immediate past president of the Freshwater Sciences Society, damns Joy
with faint praise, calling his academic work steady. Hes productive but he is not at the top of his field. If he was, hed be a
full professor. Joy, he says, has raised the profile of water issues, but upset peers by casting aspersions on their
independence and strayed beyond his core discipline by commenting on issues such as environmental economics and soil
contamination.

The Cost Of Speaking Out

Death says his former student and long-time Massey University colleague has taken up the mantle of environmental
advocate at considerable expense to his academic career. Joy is a senior lecturer and was declined for promotion to
associate professor recently.

The university promotion system works on rewards for publication in scholarly journals, not for talking to community meetings
or writing op-eds.

Traditional science is meant to be about helping the wider public and communicating, but in reality there
are so many barriers to doing that, that you have to make a conscious decision to do it.

Meaning?

New Zealand scientists tend to want to be like most Kiwis and not antagonise people, but if you go to conferences
in the US its the complete opposite. They get up and criticise you not personally but the science. And thats
what science is meant to be. But New Zealand scientists tend not to want to do that.

They tend to want to stay among the crowd and not speak out and upset anybody

The other unfortunate thing is funding. Most of the funding in New Zealand, in contrast to other countries, is very
much tied to the Government directly or indirectly, and for whatever reason the Government is quite tightly linked
with many of the industry lobby groups, particularly dairy, and dairy is certainly not very keen on us outlining that
water quality in New Zealand is degrading as a result of what it is doing.
Joys boss, Massey University vice-chancellor Steve Maharey, has backed the scientist through the various controversies,
provided he can support his claims. (Maharey says he can.)

Steve Maharey

But for Joy, there is more at stake than tenure and job security.

Theres a fight to be had with the Government over what he sees as bogus bottom-line standards for freshwater; theres a
battle to be won in boardrooms such as Landcorps to bring the true cost of environmental degradation to account; theres a
public to be enlightened.

Ive decided that this problem is more important to me than my career. This job is the longest job Ive had in my
life. Im sure Ill get by if I lose this job. I can go sailing or truck driving.

It means far more to me to put guys like [Environment Minister] Nick Smith in the spotlight than it does to
keep paying the mortgage.

Maybe if Id been a career academic I wouldnt be like that Im looking for my next opportunity to tell New
Zealand about this.

The academic has become an activist, he says, not because I chose to be, but because I have to be.

Mike Joy was awarded the Reo mo te Awa award at the Morgan Foundation NZ River Awards on November 26, which
Rebecca Macfie helped judge.

Cures, Health & Wellbeing

Part One: Click here

 Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/health-wellbeing-5.shtml

Chiropractic: The Story The Medical Establishment Does Not Want You To Hear
February 25 2016 | From: UndoctoredMovie

And knowing the truth could change your life.

When people hear the word Chiropractor it evokes a wide range of responses. And there is a surprising
reason for these mixed emotions!

The American Medical Association (and other high-profile medical organizations) were found guilty in United States
Federal Court of a conspiracy to contain and eliminate the chiropractic profession. While millions would attest to the
'miracles of chiropractic', a malevolent agenda sought to eliminate it.

To experienced "Undoctored" is to experience a real life Rocky story where the underdog wins. You will hear from real
patients, world-class profession athletes and many experts about the best-kept healthcare secret that could change and
maybe even save, your life.

To watch this brilliant documentary click here.

Vaccine Damage: Olivia's Long Road Back To Health + Media Blackout: France
Opposes Vaccines
February 23 2016 | From: Stuff / Infowars

"Isn't it crazy that life can be one thing and in an instant it can be changed forever," a Timaru
teenager blogged at the end of last year.

Olivia in Starship Hospital in Auckland in July this year, after her heart changed rhythm and caused her to keep blacking out

Since then she has come to the conclusion that it was no coincidence she fell acutely ill after getting the HPV
vaccine.

Related: Mainstream media blackout: Physicians in France join growing list of doctors who question vaccine
safety

Olivia, 16, cannot prove her belief is correct, despite going through 14 months of hell.
A week after being vaccinated in July 2014 she become allergic to various foods. Then fatigue and breathing difficulties set
in. Over the Christmas holidays she struggled to walk up stairs.

"Following this I got shingles, had poor vision and was dizzy every time I sat up. So basically, I spent those
summer holidays in bed."

Back at school in February, Olivia had a breathing episode and her legs failed to hold her weight. She was taken to Timaru
Hospital but no diagnosis was forthcoming.

Media Blackout: France Opposes Vaccines

France has punched a gaping hole in the fake consensus about vaccines.

Get used to it. We live in an Orwellian landscape. When there is a really serious story that needs to be censored, it
is. It gets little or no play. Its buried.

And vaccines is one of those stories.

Here, from thevaccinereaction.org, is a shocker: The French National Debate on Vaccines, by Marco Caceres, August 19:

"Between 2005 and 2010, the proportion of French people in favour or very in favour of vaccination dropped from
90% to 60% (2013 INPES Peretti-Watel health barometer). The percentage of French people between the ages of
18 and 75 who are anti-vaccination increased from 8.5% in 2005 to 38.2% in 2010.

In 2005, 58% of doctors questioned the usefulness of vaccines administered to children while 31% of doctors were
expressing doubts about vaccine safety. These figures must surely have increased since then.
France has punched a gaping hole in the fake consensus about vaccines. In the US and other countries, people are taught
there is an overwhelming positive attitude about vaccines. Allowing this story about France to leak and bleed into major
media would refute that lie in a second.

Not only is consensus built through relentless propaganda, but when the consensus doesnt exist because the propaganda
fails, that fact is blacked out.

To put it another way, major media exist to invent consensus, and when they cant, they hide the fact.

American medical reporters for mainstream outlets are among the worst journalists in the world. Over the years, Ive spoken
to some of them. They try to radiate scientific authority, but behind that front theyre a) brainwashed morons or b) sold-out
pharmaceutical shills.

The shills hype medical drugs, vaccines, and just-over-the horizon research breakthroughs with the phony conviction of late-
night infomercial spokespeople.
One reason a high percentage of the French oppose vaccines is: out in the countryside, they still know what good clean
food is. Based on several conversations Ive had with people who live there, the fresh local produce makes American food,
by comparison, taste like cardboard. The French understand that real nutrition is a key to preserving health.

Thats why pharmaceutical giants are rooting hard for GMOs and pesticides, and are, in some cases, producing them. The
more GMOs and chemical poisons on the land, the lower the level of general health, and the easier it is to peddle vaccines
and drugs as a necessary answer.

Thats how the game is played.

Related: France Decides to Opt Out of Vaccines

Everything We Think We Know About Addiction Is Wrong

February 22 2016 | From: InfoWars

Drugs Dont Cause Addiction: This Brilliant Animated Video Will Change Your View on Drugs
Forever

Most people think that the reason why people become addicted to drugs is solely because of the drugs
themselves.

Related: Addiction Is Not Addictive

This, however, is far from the truth, as shown repeatedly by scientific studies on drug addiction. The brilliant short animated
video below will explain to you why drugs dont actually cause addiction, changing your view on drugs forever.

This video is adapted from Johann Hari's New York Times best-selling book 'Chasing The Scream: The First and Last Days
of the War on Drugs.' For more information, and to take a quiz to see what you know about addiction, go to
www.chasingthescream.com

Russia Bans All U.S. Corn And Soy Imports Due To GMO Contamination
February 18 2016 | From: NaturalSociety

Russias food safety regulator Rosselkhoznadzor just announced a complete ban starting
February 15 on all US corn and soy imports.

This is a huge blow to organic and GM farmers alike, though the ban will be instated due to genetically modified
crop and microbial contamination.

Though the total exports to Russia from the US are small in comparison to soybean exports, totaling over $156 million in
recent years, with Russia importing only 4,742 metric tons of U.S. corn, the ban will still hurt US farmers.

Assistant Director of the Rosselkhoznadzor, Alexey Alekseenko said:

Restrictions will be imposed on imports starting from February 15. They (the US) have to establish a system to
ensure safety of products imported to Russia.

China has issued similar bans in the past due to GM contamination, and only recently did an about face on the issue. US
corn exports to the country recently dropped by 85% after a report detailing GM contamination was released.
Putin recently said that Russians need to be protected from GM crops. The food latest ban follows that credo. According to
the regulator, the corn imported from the US is often infected with dry rot of maize.

In addition, according to the Russian watchdog, corn can be used for transgenic crops in Russia. The potential damage from
import and spread of quarantinable objects on the territory of Russia is estimated at 10-15 bln rubles ($126 mln-189 mln)
annually.

Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

So, a combination of microbial disease and genetically mutated genes are both a concern for Russia, China, and multiple
other countries who are refusing GM imports from the US.

Just months ago, President Putins meeting with US Secretary of State John Kerry revealed the Russian leaders extreme
outrage over the Obama regimes continued protection of global seed and plant bio-genetic giants Syngenta and
Monsanto.

How Big Pharma Gets Away With Selling 'P' / Methamphetamine To Children:
By Renaming It 'Adderall'
February 16 2016 | From: NaturalNews

In a recent appearance on All In with Chris Hayes on MSNBC, drug abuse and addiction expert Carl
Hart of Columbia University made a shocking claim:
There isn't much difference between the demonized street drug methamphetamine (also known as meth or crystal
meth) and the prescription drug Adderall.

In a recent appearance on All In with Chris Hayes on MSNBC, drug abuse and addiction expert Carl Hart of Columbia
University made a shocking claim: There isn't much difference between the demonized street drug methamphetamine (also
known as meth or crystal meth) and the prescription drug Adderall.

It's not the first time Hart has raised this idea. In a 2014 report, Hart and co-authors Joanne Csete and Don Habibi, also from
Columbia, examined in depth the effects of meth on the brain, concluding that there is no discernible difference in the effects
of any amphetamine, whether prescription or illicit.

FDA Says Meth Okay for ADHD, Weight Loss

First, some definitions: Amphetamines are a class of chemicals that are used both medically and recreationally. The street
drug known as "meth" may refer to either methamphetamine or dextroamphetamine. "Crystal meth" is a more specific form,
methamphetamine hydrochloride.
The authors of the report note that both popular and scientific literature regularly make meth out to be much stronger and
more addictive than other amphetamines.

"Such statements, however, are inconsistent with the empirical evidence," they wrote. " In carefully controlled
laboratory studies of human research participants, [dextroamphetamine] and methamphetamine produce nearly
identical physiological and behavioral effects....

They both increase blood pressure, pulse, euphoria, and desire to take the drug in a dose-dependent manner.
Essentially, they are the same drug."

That means amphetamine drugs such as Adderall - prescribed to treat narcolepsy and "attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder" (ADHD) in children as young as two - are in fact no different in action from meth.

In fact, the active ingredients of Adderall are actually 75 percent dextroamphetamine salts; the other 25 percent are other
amphetamines. That's why the drug is also used to enhance mental and athletic performance, and recreationally to produce
a euphoric "high."
There's another FDA-approved drug that's even closer to crystal meth: the active ingredient of Desoxyn is
methamphetamine hydrochloride - which is, literally, crystal meth. Desoxyn is approved for treatment of ADHD (even in the
absence of any nervous system dysfunction) and as a weight-loss drug.

The Absurdities of Drug War Politics

That means that Adderall, Desoxyn and other prescription amphetamines likely carry the same risks as meth. According to
Hart and colleagues, one of the main risks of long-term amphetamine use is toxicity to the brain cells that produce dopamine
and other monoamine neurotransmitters.

This appears to occur because large doses of amphetamine abnormally boost dopamine levels in the brain, leading to the
production of cell- and DNA-destroying free radicals.

"This, in turn, could lead to persistent deficits in the functioning of dopamine-containing cells," the researchers
wrote.

They note that recreational drug users may be somewhat insulated from this effect, because they tend to start with small
doses and increase their usage over time. The worst effects in animal studies were seen in drug-naive animals given a large
dose repeatedly.

The authors do not mention if this could happen to children abruptly given high doses of ADHD drugs.

Related: 4 Facts About ADHD That Teachers & Doctors Never Tell Parents

Other known risks of long-term amphetamine use include stroke and "paranoia mimicking full-blown psychosis."

Hart and colleagues note that the artificial division between meth and drugs such as Adderall is typical of the politics-driven
"War on Drugs." In 1986, for example, Congress passed a law making the penalties for crack possession 50 times more
severe than the penalties for cocaine.

But these are chemically the same drug and produce identical effects. The only major difference is that crack is typically
smoked rather than snorted, leading to higher blood concentrations of the active ingredient.
 "To punish crack users more harshly than powder users is analogous to punishing those who are caught smoking
marijuana more harshly than those caught eating marijuana-laced brownies," the researchers wrote.

The Human Aura And DNA: How You Choose Your Genes
February 15 2016 | From: EnergyFanatics

Every human being has an energy field around their body. Some people call it the aura, or the
luminous energy field, or simply the human energy field.

The purpose of this article is not only to prove the existence of the human energy field, but also to explore the
function of our DNA, the interaction between DNA and the unified field, and the influence of the human energy field
on that relationship.

Ultimately, if the science is indeed correct, this is a first step to health, healing, and possibly human evolution.

If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.

- Nikola Tesla

Human Energy Field and DNA The Origin of Health

In the Western world our doctors go through almost a decade of schooling, and in that time they become masters of human
biology, anatomy, and physiology. They become adept at understanding disease, and diagnosing all forms of illness, yet in a
large majority of cases, what is their prescription? Drugs or Surgery.

All illness has a spiritual/energetic origin. When you do not cleanse your human energy field your energetic field
becomes distorted, stagnant, and impure. It becomes extremely imbalanced and charged with low-energy vibrations which
cause disease in mind, and spirit, and eventually in our bodies. But why?

The reason why this occurs is because one of the major functions of our DNA is that it receives and transmits energy. This
has been shown to be one of the major functions of junk DNA (which make up about 95% of the human genome) which is
what it was called before they understood what it was all about, but now it is beginning to be shown as an essential
component of our biology and DNA.

One of the new discoveries in DNA as Bruce Lipton talks about is epigenetic control, which means literally above-genetic
control. Thus the new understanding of DNA is that the genes which our DNA codes is dictated as a response to the
environment. In essence we are in a perpetual process of adaptation, which means that we have the potential for continuous
evolution in our environment, moreover, spontaneous evolution.

More specifically, what is it that our DNA responds to in order to determine the nature of our environment?

Our DNA does not have eyes, or ears, so it cannot see or hear what is going on. Instead it determines the environment by
reading the energy. It receives energetic signals from the environment and interacts directly with the information and codes
encoded within the unified field, reads them, and then our DNA codes and/or activates the appropriate genes suitable for the
environment we are in.

What do you think happens to DNA when the human energy field is all polluted by negative energies? To answer this
question, we have to look to water.

Consciousness and Water

Dr. Masaru Emoto from Japan for the last number of years has been doing some truly revolutionary work with water. What he
is doing is researching the effects of human thought, emotion, andintention (directed attention) on the structure of water. (The
source for this section is The Hidden Messages in Water by Dr. Masaru Emoto, and it is a truly enlightening book.)

His tests involve him sending specific thoughts to water (or getting others to do so), and then he flash freezes that water so
that he can take a look at the crystal formed, and examine the relationship between the energy / thought / emotion sent to the
water, and the crystals that are formed as a result.

Amazingly he found that when positive thoughts,

energies, and words were directed to the water, they
formed beautiful, highly coherent crystals.

Whereas when negative, angry, or hateful thoughts and

emotions were directed towards the water, or in some cases
with words directly, he found that there was no more
coherent structure, and that the crystals froze with no
sacred geometrical pattern. In other words, there was no
coherence.

This work proves two things: (1) That our thoughts and
emotions influence reality directly; and (2) That the type of
energy matters.

What is going on with these water crystals is that when an

individual thinks a certain thought, speaks a certain word, or
feels in a certain way, their energy is oscillating the human
energy field which restructures the geometric patterns within
space according to that energy.

Then the frequency of our energy radiates throughout space

(or it is transmitted non-locally I truly have no idea) and it
restructures the field in accordance with our energy, and
this restructures the field the space around the water
molecules because atoms are 99.9999% empty space.

Then when the water is flash frozen, it freezes along the

geometric pattern created in the space around its molecules
by human thought, emotion, and intention.

As we have seen from the images, the highest emotions of love, kindness, joy, and gratitude create highly coherent
geometrical patterns in the field which creates crystals that are truly perfect, beautiful, and harmonic which resonate those
emotions within us as we observe them.

Negative energies on the other hand seem to distort the natural structure of the field, vibrating the field in a discordant
fashion, which create crystals that radiate a sense of ugliness, imperfection, dis-coherence, and in essence, disease. If it is
possible for water crystals to look sick, ill, and literally diseased, it is these ones.

Perception

So if our bodies are 75% water, and if our genes are bio-oscillating crystalline structures which read and interpret energy,
and if we are 99.999% space, then how do you think the energies within the human energy field are impacting our DNA, and
most relevant of all, our health?

As I said before, the latest, and possibly the cutting edge of genetic sciences is working with epi-genetic control, meaning
that our DNA and the genes which are coded are determined by the energy of our environment. Well, what determines our
environment?
It is not what is out there which has the greatest impact, it is our perception of what is out there. In other words, what
we believe, think, and feel to be true about our environment determines how we perceive our environment.

So if we think the world is negative, it becomes negative to us. But the opposite is also true. If we live in a state of love,
happiness, and inner peace, then we perceive our environment to be the same and thus what we attract is much different.

The human energy field directly informs our DNA and is directly responsible for the genes coded, our health, any illness or
disease which may appear in our body, and even our intelligence, memory, and ability to heal is directly affected. All aspects
of our lives are determined by the quality of our consciousness.

The Phantom DNA Effect

"Another important piece of evidence that helps us to understand really what is going on when our DNA interacts
with the unified field and with consciousness is known as the Phantom DNA Effect. It was discovered by Dr. Peter
Gariaev who put DNA in a tiny quartz container and zapped it with a mild laser.

He then observed the DNA with equipment so sensitive it could detect a single photon. He found the DNA acted
like a sponge, and absorbed the photons storing them in a cork-screw shaped spiral.

After he finished his experiments he removed the quartz vial with the DNA in it and left. Yet to his utter amazement
when he returned to his lab he discovered that the machines were still detecting the photons of light spiraling in the
same cork-screw spiral as if the DNA was still present, even though he had removed it from the machine! The
spiral was visibly for a further 30 days."

Source: p.160-163 of The Source Field Investigations by David Wilcock

What does this Mean?

I believe that we can safely make these deductions based off of the evidence at hand:

1. The structure of the vacuum, the unified field, actually stores information, energy, and light, which in reality are all the
same thing.

2. This strongly suggests that the DNA molecule and structure is resonant with the structure of space-time. In other words
its structure is somehow coherent as to cause the field to interact with it in this way once it is charged with energy, in this
case a mild laser. Could it be the field responding with the codes necessary for the DNA molecule to adapt to its new
environment?

3. This process infers that to some degree the DNA molecule is like a biological computer chip, an interface between our
biology and the unified field. It means that an interesting function of DNA is to store light (which is information), and that this
structure leaves a particularly strong energetic imprint onto the fabric of space-time. Maybe even that the process of the DNA
storing energy activated an energetic construct already present in the unified field.

4. The evidence also suggests that there is communication going on between our DNA which stores
energy/information/light, but it also seems that our DNA is not just informing the field and leaving an energetic imprint on the
human energy field, but that the field is informing our DNA right back.

As a continually growing body of information related to

energetically driven evolution is suggesting, all the codes,
imprints, and information may very well be stored directly in
the energetic field which creation emanates from; in
essence, within light itself.

And when we are young or when our energetic fields are

pure and unpolluted, our energy resonates most clearly with
the universe in this state causing an unobstructed
communication between our consciousness and universal
consciousness, and between our DNA and the field.

When this communication is undistributed, we become the

epitome of mental, spiritual, and physical health.

If our emotions were negative or incoherent, that would be

disrupting the communication between the field and our
DNA, and it is this above all which evidence is suggesting is
the source of all disease.

The field of intention, conscious awareness, energy, the

universal mind, whatever you choose to call the infinite
energy density of the vacuum, the fact remains that the
energy of space all around us, is infinite.

In other words, it is love, for that is the highest energy that

we have a name for.

As Masaru Emotos work shows, the more positive, loving,

and compassionate the persons energy, the higher the
degree of coherence in the water crystals.

Imagine what these positive energies do to our bodies which are 75% water, and imagine the effect of that highly coherent
energy on our DNA. When we align with this energy, with our source, and thus with our higher self, we are embodying this
energy which clears all the negativity and energetic disturbance within us manifesting health in mind, body, and spirit.

"Everything is energy and thats all there is to it. Match the frequency of the reality that you want and you cannot
help but get that reality. It can be no other way. This is not philosophy, this is physics.

- Bashar

Cancer Industry Now Admits That Chemo And Radiation Treatments Generate Huge
Repeat Business & Repeat Profits
February 14 2016 | From: RealFarmacy

Second cancers are on the rise in the United States, according to a new study, which found that
one in five new cases involve someone who has had the disease before.

The study also found that second cancers, which dont include reoccurring cancers, but are a completely new type
of cancer, have increased 300 percent since the 1970s.

First-time cancers have also spiked, increasing 70 percent in the same time frame.

The Western world of medicine is going with their usual explanation, or rather lack thereof, claiming that they are unaware of
the reason for the surge but pointing to the fact that people are living longer and are therefore more at risk for the disease.
But living into your 80s and 90s shouldnt guarantee that youll get cancer.

While genetics are a factor, other influences such as your environment, the food you eat, the water you drink, the air you
breathe, the vaccines you inject and even the kind of medical treatment you receive may contribute much more than your
age when it comes to determining your risk for cancer.
Emerging research continues to show that pesticides, heavy metals and hormone mimickers such as BPA and BPS, as well
as other environmental contaminants, greatly influence the risk of developing cancer.

For those who are unfortunate enough to receive a second cancer diagnosis, the treatment you received for your first
cancer may ultimately be to blame.

Are Cancer Treatments Causing More Cancer?

A document [PDF] by the American Cancer Society titled Second Cancers in Adults admits that second cancers may be
caused by cancer treatment.

Radiation therapy was recognized as a potential cause of cancer many years ago, according to the ACS, which also
admits that most types of leukemia, including acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML)
and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), can all be caused by radiation.

Most cancers caused by radiation therapy develop within just a few years of being irradiated, with the disease peaking at
five to nine years following exposure.

Similarly, chemotherapy drugs have also been linked to different kinds of second cancers, with the most common being
myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and AML; ALL has also been linked to these cancer drugs.

Cancer Drugs Cause at Least 40,000 Cases of New Cancer each Year in the U.S.

To help put that into perspective, about 13,000 people are diagnosed each year with MDS.

Aside from radiation and chemotherapy, other causes include toxins present in tobacco smoke, and high levels of industrial-
type chemicals such as benzene, a carcinogenic petrochemical that is widely used in plastics, synthetic fibers, rubber
lubricants, resins, dyes, detergents, drugs and pesticides.

Nearly another 20,000 people are diagnosed annually with AML, with more than half of those cases ending in death, and
approximately 6,000 people are diagnosed with ALL each year.
This means that at least 40,000 cancer occurrences may be directly attributed to cancer drugs.

Determining how many people perish from cancer drugs is extremely difficult, as most of the deaths are recorded as being
from cancer, and not the treatment.

Remember, the cancer industry is one of the worlds most lucrative businesses, generating $100 billion last year. Those
profits are expected to increase at about 8 percent each year over the next three years as more and more Americans will be
diagnosed and treated for cancer.

A Quantum Leap To A Worldwide Paradigm Shift In Healing And Health Is

Happening
February 13 2016 | From: QuantumLeap / JimHumble

After ONLY one week the Quantum Leap film has had over 32,000 views. Our goal is to have
100,000 people in February learn how they can take control of their own health!
Please get this above link to as many people as possible! We dont want this to go viral, we want it to go antiviral
just like MMS!

Related: MMS and Jim Humble

With personal experience of the amazing power of MMS this is something that I can thoroughly recommend to anyone for an
enormous range of diseases and ailments. The reason why the MMS Protocols are so powerful is because while it is not a
cure in and of itself, it provides the immune system with what it needs to be able to fight off virtually any disease caused by
pathogens, bacteria and viruses.
In a world where our bodies are constantly under attack from toxic chemicals and additives in our water and food, the
benefits of MMS effecetively super-charging your immune system are quite simply incredible.
Australia Is Actively Trying To Approve A New Way Of Vaccinating You: By Air!
February 12 2016 | From: OpenSourceTruth / YourNewsWire

Dont want to be vaccinated? well soon you may not have a choice as our loving Governments will
just spray & vaccinate us through breath.
Would you like a complimentary forced vaccination with your chemtrails Sir / Ma'am?

Aircraft Information

Registration: VH-OJU
Type code: B744
Type: Boeing 747-438
S/N: 25566
Airline: Qantas

Australia is actively trying to approve a new way of vaccinating Its people: by air! The Office of the Gene
Technology Regulator (OGTR) is looking at a licence application from PaxVax Australia (PaxVax) for the intentional
release of a GMO vaccine consisting of live bacteria into the Australian environment

According to the regulator, it qualifies as a limited and controlled release under section 50A of the Gene Technology Act
2000 (the Act).

PaxVax is looking to get approval to conduct the clinical trial of a genetically modified live bacterial vaccine against cholera.
Once underway the trial is expected to be completed within one year, with sites selected from local government areas
(LGAs) in Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia.
paxvax.com

PaxVax has proposed a number of control measures they say will restrict the spread and persistence of the GM vaccine and
its introduced genetic material, however there is always a possiblity of these restrictions failing and infecting wildlife and
ecosystems. How can we know whats really going on here, whats being sprayed on us & how it will affect the natural
environment?

The Australian government along with their big Pharma buddies are looking to vaccinate every person living in Australia, no
exceptions. There are large pockets throughout the country where people simply will not vaccinate & the numbers are
growing so this represents a great way to silently vaccinate these communities right down to an individual level, no needles
& no fuss but most importantly, no choice.

Aerial vaccines have been used in the United States directed towards animals by the use of plastic packets dropped by
planes or helicopters. Sanofi (who is one of the largest vaccine manufacturers in the world) has subsidiary companies such
as Merial Limited who manufacture Raboral, an oral live-virus poisonous to humans yet distributed wildlife in the masses.

Forcibly Release Intentional and Controlled Release of Aerosolized GMO Vaccine

File this under were f*cked According to a few different sources, Australia is actively trying to approve a new way of
vaccinating you: by air! An article in Prevent Disease: The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) is on its way
to approve a licence application from PaxVax Australia (PaxVax) for the intentional release of a GMO vaccine consisting of
live bacteria into the environment in Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and Victoria.

Likely one of the preferred delivery agents

According to the regulator, it qualifies as a limited and controlled release under section 50A of the Gene Technology Act
2000 (the Act).

PaxVax is seeking approval to conduct the clinical trial of a genetically modified live bacterial vaccine against cholera. Once
underway the trial is expected to be completed within one year, with trial sites selected from local government areas (LGAs)
in Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia.

PaxVax has proposed a number of control measures they say will restrict the spread and persistence of the GM vaccine and
its introduced genetic material, however there is always a possiblity of these restrictions failing and infecting wildlife and
ecosystems.

Aerial vaccines have used in the United States directed towards animals by the use of plastic packets dropped by planes or
helicopters. Sanofi (who is one of the largest vaccine manufacturers in the world) has subsidiary companies such as Merial
Limited who manufacture Raboral, an oral live-virus poisonous to humans yet distributed wildlife in the masses.
West Nile Virus Spraying

In 2006 Michael Greenwood wrote an article for the Yale School of Public Health entitled, Aerial Spraying Effectively
Reduces Incidence of West Nile Virus (WNV) in Humans. The article stated that the incidence of human West Nile virus
cases can be significantly reduced through large scale aerial spraying that targets adult mosquitoes, according to research
by the Yale School of Public Health and the California Department of Public Health.

Under the mandate for aerial spraying for specific vectors that pose a threat to human health, aerial vaccines known as DNA
Vaccine Enhancements and Recombinant Vaccine against WNV may be tested or used to protect the people from vector
infection exposures. DNA vaccine enhancements specifically use Epstein-Barr viral capsides with multi human complement
class II activators to neutralize antibodies.

The recombinant vaccines against WNV use Rabbit Beta-globulin or the poly (A) signal of the SV40 virus. In early studies of
DNA vaccines it was found that the negative result studies would go into the category of future developmental research
projects in gene therapy.

During the studies of poly (A) signaling of the SV40 for WNV vaccines, it was observed that WNV will lie dormant in
individuals who were exposed to chicken pox, thus upon exposure to WNV aerial vaccines the potential for the release of
chicken pox virus would cause a greater risk to having adult onset Shingles.

California Aerial Spraying for WNV and SV40

In February 2009 to present date, aerial spraying for the WNV occurred in major cities within the State of California. During
spraying of Anaheim, CA a Caucasian female (age 50) was exposed to heavy spraying, while doing her daily exercise of
walking several miles. Heavy helicopter activity occurred for several days in this area. After spraying, she experienced light
headedness, nausea, muscle aches and increased low back pain.
She was evaluated for toxicological mechanisms that were associated with pesticide exposure due to aerial spraying
utilizing advanced biological monitoring testing. The test results which included protein band testing utilizing Protein Coupled
Response (PCR) methods were positive for KD-45. KD-45 is the protein band for SV-40 Simian Green Monkey virus.

Additional tests were performed for Epstein-Barr virus capside and Cytomeglia virus which are used in bioengineering for
gene delivery systems through viral protein envelope and adenoviral protein envelope technology. The individual was
positive for both; indicating a highly probable exposure to a DNA vaccination delivery system through nasal inhalation.

Pentagon Document Revealed Aerial Vaccination Plans

In the Quarterly FunVax Review in June, 2007, the report lists the objective of a project listed as ID: 149AZ2 as a
preparation of a viral vector that will inhibit/decrease the expression of a specific disruption gene (VMAT2) within a human
population.
It further indicates in the abstract that six method of virus dispersal were tested including high altitude release, water supply
release, insect transmission, and various methods of diffusion.

Conspiracy: This Is Why Brazil Is Ground Zero For The Latest Bio-Engineered
Pandemic
February 11 2016 | From: TheMilleniumReport

Every Major Disease Outbreak Has Been Manufactured in the Biological Weapons Laboratories of
the Western Powers.
The U.S. and U.K. possess the most advanced scientific knowledge and applied technology for producing bio-
weaponry, which they routinely utilize to create bio-weapons of mass destruction.

Related: Zika: Sex and Bloodsucking Vampire Bugs: the Movie

Decades ago the Military-Industrial Complex (MIC) of the United States of America (in collaboration with their British
counterparts) committed itself to the deliberate path of exerting full-spectrum dominance over the entire planetary realm.

The essentially Anglo-American Military-Industrial Complex undertook various and sundry endeavors simultaneously in
order to fulfill this critical mission to attain and maintain world domination.

Related: SERCO: A Corporate Octopus With Tentacles Wrapped Around The Globe

Not only did the MIC achieve nuclear superiority within the world community of nations, the U.S. Armed Services also
created a global network of military bases unrivaled in world history.

One of the key pillars of attaining full spectrum dominance is the capacity to execute bio-weaponry programs surreptitiously,
quickly and efficiently anywhere on Planet Earth.
Toward that end the many bio-weapons laboratories which now dot the landscape of the USA have worked assiduously to
fabricate the perfect biological weapons for the right applications and perfect situations.

Its important to understand that the USA and UK form the very backbone of a supranational entity known as the Anglo-
American Axis[1]. This large group of countries, which is dedicated to maintaining the Anglo-American Empire - by every
means possible - has been locked in a century-long war against the BRICS nations.

As a matter of fact, the First and Second World Wars were both waged in an effort to establish the USA as the military arm
of the New World Order.
NATO is merely an extension of the Anglo-American military juggernaut.

Related: The USA: Military Arm Of The New World Order

Whats the Larger Point Here?

Although it has not been declared, a full-blown World War III has been and is being waged under the radar between the
AAA and the BRICS.

The entire Middle East is obviously just one major military theater of this ongoing global conflict. So are Africa and South
America. Only on those two continents the preferred weapons of mass destruction are of a biological nature.

History of Genocide via Bio-Weapons

You see, the white man learned long ago that the people of the African continent are deathly afraid of contagious diseases
and infectious epidemics. The populations of many of the South American countries suffer from the very same phobia.

They dont understand illness and disease the way that the educated and industrialized nations of the Northern Hemisphere
do. There is much superstition which still surrounds any kind of disease outbreak, especially throughout the rural areas. The
resulting taboos run very deep throughout society.
With this hidden knowledge it is now quite easy to understand why so many disease outbreaks first occur in either Africa or
South America. Whether it is Ebola in West Africa or the West Nile Virus in East Africa, HIV/AIDS in West Central Africa or
Malaria anywhere in Africa, Chagas disease in South America or Dengue fever throughout the whole Southern Hemisphere,
so many pandemics find their origins south of the border.

No one denies that the southern climes and predominant biota cultivate an extremely conducive environment for mosquito-
borne diseases and the like. This scientific fact is quite well established.

The point here is that because these scary diseases are well known among the local populations, they can be furtively
spread by those who wish to do them harm by their silent enemies to the north.

The deliberate vector of disseminations are many to include stealth vaccinations, GMO mosquitoes, tainted prescriptions,
contaminated water supplies, infected farm animals, toxic produce, corrupted restaurant food, chemtrail aerosols, etc.
This is a subtle but very important point. These diseases are known to be common in these regions of the world; therefore,
no one suspects that they have been meticulously weaponized to make them much more deadly.

They have also been precisely bio-engineered to target specific gene pools and bloodlines.

In this fashion the Indigenous Peoples can be gradually killed off so that they no longer pose an obstacle to giving
up their lands to the covetous Anglo-American corporate interests.

This very same tactic was of course used against the Native American Indians by the U.S. Federal Government that was
determined to wipe out the tribes across America in order to steal their lands. That strategy really worked like a charm for
them. And they have never forgotten it.
After all, how could the Indian warriors, who contracted smallpox from the blankets provided to them by the friendly white
brothers, ever fight on the harsh battlefields?

As for the Indigenous Peoples of Brazil, how are they expected to respond to a terrible disease that shrinks the human head
and arrests brain development. Yes, that is what the Zika virus does, unless the public is being misled about the true source
of this medical crisis.
Fast Forward to the 2016 Olympics in Brazil

Whenever bio-weapons of mass destruction are used with such great effect there are always several goals on the agenda of
the perpetrators. The Zika virus outbreak is no exception.

Because of where the exact ground zero of this explosive epidemic is located in Brazil, it is certain that this public health
disaster was quite purposefully manufactured there to disrupt the 2016 Summer Olympics.
Brazil has already been under continuous assault by the AAA, as it represents the South American cornerstone of the
BRICS economic union. The Brazilian economy is also the largest in South and Central America, therefore, it provides a
much-needed financial engine to keep the BRICS momentum going throughout the world.

The AAA knew that if they took down Brazil economically, as they have been doing relentlessly on the political front, the
BRICS union would be weakened considerably. The new world reserve currency would then likely stay with the still
dominant petrodollar during this crucial period where it is also under serious assault.

Both Russia and China have already undermined the petrodollar in profound and irreparable ways. So have Iran and India
and other quieter BRICS-aligned nations
The important point about Brazil is that a substantial amount of public money and resources have been allocated to this
formidable and demanding enterprise known as the Summer Olympics. The private sector, as always, has also dedicated
much investment to making the Olympics a commercial success.

With the Zika virus and ensuing epidemic raging in the back yard of Rio de Janeiro, what else could be expected but the
second prong of the AAA strategy to sabotage the 2016 Summer Olympiad.

See headlines below:

Exclusive: U.S. athletes should consider skipping Rio if fear Zika - Officials

Zika concerns could see Kenya withdraw from Rio 2016 Olympics

U.S. Athletes Told to Skip Rio Olympics if Concerned About Zika

Olympic fears over Zika: Athletes facing decision on whether they are willing to risk travelling to Rio for 2016 Games

Researchers Weigh Risks of Zika Spreading at Rio Olympics

Zika Virus Spurs Concerns Over Summer Olympic Games In Rio

 Olympics in Brazil could spark spread of Zika virus abroad, Canadian dosc warn

Olympic organizers deny Games under threat due to Zika virus

Do you get it now?

What better way to further destroy the fragile Brazilian economy and sap the spirit of the nation?!

Conclusion

The Anglo-American corporatocracy has enjoyed the status of global hegemon since the advent of the Industrial
Revolution. Because of the rapacious nature of the predatory capitalism that it systematically employs, it only knows how to
take from those who have what they want. This is the way it has always been since the incorporation of the East India
Company in London in 1600.

The Huge difference between now and when India was pillaged, China was plundered and Africa was raped is that the
BRICS are now well aware of the true enemy and its unrelenting tactics.
Russia and China, India and Brazil, Iran and South Africa are under constant attack by the AAA. However, they now have a
very secret weapon that is being trained on the City of London and Washington, D.C.

More accurately, the BRICS have a number of secret weapons which will be employed with great consequence and
awesome effect on the primary nations of the AAA. Part II of this series will further discuss those secret weapons. In the
meantime, the reader is encouraged to contemplate the overwhelming repercussions of just one of those weapons known
as: Free Enegy

Editors Note

It has been rightly pointed out by many that the looming Zika virus pandemic may be to a great extent based on fraudulent
data and false information. Inasmuch as it is being reported by those agencies like WHO which are completely controlled by
the AAA, why should the MSM ever be believed?

Because of all the fake false flags and fictitious disease outbreaks occurring over many decades such as the recent Ebola
scare, its clear that these trumpeted pandemics have a huge component of purposefully deceptive reporting.
However, it is virtually impossible to ferret out the truth about a manufactured and bogus pandemic. To what degree is there
a real mosquito-borne Zika virus causing the profiled symptoms is extremely difficult to say. Especially given the typical
demographics of these types of mosquito-borne public health disasters, its even more challenging to arrive at the
truth. After all, they ALL occur in virtually the same geographic areas.

With that said, we leave it up to the reader to decide how much of this fastidiously ZIKA health scare is real disease and
how much is phony baloney.

Authors Note

We almost forgot to mention what the original source of the Zika virus was, as well as who originally deposited it in 1947
- the Rockefeller Foundation.
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

You can see for yourself here: Zika virus 'owned' by Rockefeller Foundation

Reference

The Government-Corporate Complex Takes Complete Control Of The USA

Endnotes

[1] Anglo-American Axis (AAA)

The Anglo-American Axis is represented, first and foremost, by the major English-speaking countries of the world: USA, UK,
Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel. The European member nations of NATO, such as Germany, France, Italy,
Spain, Portugal, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands are also closely aligned with the AAA as are all the
Scandinavian countries. So are the Asian Pacific Rim nations of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and the Philippines.

Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, Pakistan, Kuwait, Jordan, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, and Qatar also owe their allegiance
to the AAA but some of these may be changing. The World Shadow Government is an ultra-secret, supranational
organization which completely controls the Anglo-American Axis, as well as the European Union, NATO, among many other
institutional entities which constitute the Global Control Matrix.

(Source: Vladimir Putins Russia: Perfect Foil To The Anglo-American Axis And Their New World Order)
Some Of The Biggest Lies Of Science
February 11 2016 | From: ActivistTeacher

The maintenance of the hierarchical structures that control our lives depends on Pinters vast
tapestry of lies upon which we feed.

The maintenance of the hierarchical structures that control our lives depends on Pinters vast tapestry of lies
upon which we feed. Therefore the main institutions that embed us into the hierarchy, such as schools,
universities, and mass media and entertainment corporations, have a primary function to create and maintain this
tapestry. This includes establishment scientists and all service intellectuals in charge of interpreting reality.

In fact, the scientists and experts define reality in order to bring it into conformation with the always-adapting dominant
mental tapestry of the moment.

[T]he majority of politicians, on the evidence available to us, are interested not in truth but in power and in the
maintenance of that power.

To maintain that power it is essential that people remain in ignorance, that they live in ignorance of the truth, even
the truth of their own lives. What surrounds us therefore is a vast tapestry of lies, upon which we feed.

Harold Pinter, Nobel Lecture (Literature), 2005

They also invent and build new branches of the tapestry that serve specific power groups by providing new avenues of
exploitation. These high priests are rewarded with high class status.

The Money Lie

The economists are a most significant example. It is probably not an accident that in the United States at the end of the
nineteenth century the economists were the first professional analysts to be broken in, in a battle that defined the limits of
academic freedom in universities. The academic system would from that point on impose a strict operational separation
between inquiry and theorizing as acceptable and social reform as unacceptable.

Any academic wishing to preserve her position understood what this meant.
As a side product, academics became virtuosos at nurturing a self-image of importance despite this fatal limitation on their
societal relevance, with verbiage such as: The truth is our most powerful weapon, the pen is mightier than the sword, a good
idea can change the world, reason will take us out of darkness, etc.

So the enterprise of economics became devoted to masking the lie about money. Bad lending practice, price fixing and
monopolistic controls were the main threats to the natural justice of a free market, and occurred only as errors in a mostly
self-regulating system that could be moderated via adjustments of interest rates and other safeguards.

Meanwhile no mainstream economic theory makes any mention of the fact that money itself is created wholesale in a
fractional reserve banking system owned by secret private interests given a licence to fabricate and deliver debt that must
be paid back (with interest) from the real economy, thereby continuously concentrating ownership and power over all local
and regional economies.

The 'Federal Reserve' Bank of New York

The rest of us have to earn money rather than simply fabricate it and we never own more when we die. The middle class
either pays rent or a mortgage. Wage slavery is perpetuated and degraded in stable areas and installed in its most vicious
varieties in all newly conquered territories.

It is quite remarkable that the largest exploitation scam (private money creation as debt) ever enacted and applied to the
entire planet does not figure in economic theories.

Economists are so busy modeling the ups and downs of profits, returns, employment figures, stock values, and the benefits
of mergers for mid-level exploiters that they dont notice their avoidance of the foundational elements. They model the
construction schedule while refusing to acknowledge that the terrain is an earthquake zone with vultures circling overhead.

Meanwhile the financiers write and re-write the rules themselves and again this process does not figure in macroeconomic
theories. The only human element that economists consider in their predictive mathematical models is low-level consumer
behaviour, not high-level system manipulation.
Corruption is the norm yet it does not figure. The economies, cultures and infrastructures of nations are wilfully destroyed in
order to enslave via new and larger national debts for generations into the future while economists forecast alleged
catastrophic consequences of defaulting on these debts

Management tools for the bosses and smoke and mirrors for the rest of us thank you expert economists.

The Medicine is Health Lie

Weve all heard some MD (medical doctor) interviewed on the radio gratuitously make the bold proposal that life expectancy
has increased thanks to modern medicine. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Life expectancy has increased in First World countries thanks to a historical absence of civil and territorial wars, better and
more accessible food, less work and non-work accidents, and better overall living and working conditions. The single
strongest indicator of personal health within and between countries is economy status, irrespective of access to medical
technology and pharmaceuticals.
Its worse than that because medicine actually has a negative impact on health. Medical errors (not counting misattributed
deaths from correctly administered treatments) are the third leading cause of death in the US, after heart disease and
cancer, and there is a large gap between this conservative underestimate in the number of medical error deaths and the
fourth leading cause of death.

Since medicine can do little for heart disease and cancer and since medicine has only a small statistical positive impact in
the area of trauma interventions, we conclude that public health would increase if all MDs simply disappeared. And think of
all the time loss and stress that sick people would save

One of the most dangerous places in society is the hospital. Medical errors include misdiagnoses, bad prescriptions,
prescriptions of medications that should not be combined, unnecessary surgery, unnecessary or badly administered
treatments including chemotherapy, radiation treatment, and corrective surgeries.
The lie extends to the myth that MDs anywhere near understand the human body. And this well guarded lie encourages us
to put our faith in doctors, thereby opening the door to a well orchestrated profit bonanza for big pharma.

The first thing that Doctors Without Borders (MSF) volunteers need to do in order to contribute significantly in disaster zones
is to forget their medical training and get to work on the priority tasks at hand: water, food, shelter, and disease
propagation prevention; not vaccinating, or operating, or prescribing medication Public health comes from safety, stability,
social justice, and economic buying power, not MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) units and prescription drugs.

These bone heads routinely apply unproven recommended treatments and prescribe dangerous drugs for everything from
high blood pressure from a sedentary lifestyle and bad nutrition, to apathy at school, to anxiety in public places, to post-
adolescence erectile function, to non-conventional sleep patterns, and to all the side effects from the latter drugs.
In professional yet nonetheless remarkable reversals of logic, doctors prescribe drugs to remove symptoms that are risk
indicators rather than address the causes of the risks, thereby only adding to the assault on the body.

Its unbelievable the number that medicine has done on us: Just one more way to keep us stupid (ignorant about our own
bodies) and artificially dependent on the control hierarchy. Economically disadvantaged people dont die from not having
access to medical care They die from the life constraints and liabilities directly resulting from poverty. How many MDs
have stated this obvious truth on the radio?

Environmental Science Lies

Exploitation via resource extraction, land use expropriation, and wage slavery creation and maintenance are devastating to
indigenous populations and to the environment on continental scales. It is therefore vital to cover up the crimes under a veil
of expert analysis and policy development diversion. A valued class of service intellectuals here is composed of the
environmental scientists and consultants.

Environmental scientists naively and knowingly work hand in hand with finance-corporate shysters, mainstream media,
politicians, and state and international bureaucrats to mask real problems and to create profit opportunities for select power
elites. Here are notable examples of specific cases.

Freon and Ozone

Do you know of anyone who has been killed by the ozone hole?

The 1987 Montreal Protocol banning chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) is considered a textbook case where science and
responsible governance lead to a landmark treaty for the benefit of the Earth and all its inhabitants. How often does that
happen?

At about the time that the DuPont patent on Freon(TM), the most widely used CFC refrigerant in the world, was expiring the
mainstream media picked up on otherwise arcane scientific observations and hypotheses about ozone concentration in the
upper atmosphere near the poles.
There resulted an international mobilization to criminalize CFCs and DuPont developed and patented a replacement
refrigerant that was promptly certified for use.

A Nobel Prize in chemistry was awarded in 1995 for a laboratory demonstration that CFCs could deplete ozone in simulated
atmospheric conditions. In 2007 it was shown that the latter work may have been seriously flawed by overestimating the
depletion rate by an order of magnitude, thereby invalidating the proposed mechanism for CFC-driven ozone depletion.

Not to mention that any laboratory experiment is somewhat different from the actual upper atmosphere... Is the Nobel
tainted by media and special interest lobbying?

It gets better. It turns out that the Dupont replacement refrigerant is, not surprisingly, not as inert as was Freon. As a result it
corrodes refrigerator cycle components at a much faster rate. Where home refrigerators and freezers lasted forever, they
now burn out in eight years or so.

This has caused catastrophic increases in major appliance contributions to land fill sites across North America; spurred on
by the green propaganda for obscenely efficient electrical consumptions of the new appliances under closed door (zero use)
conditions.
In addition, we have been frenzied into avoiding the sun, the UV index keeps our fear of cancer and our dependence on the
medical establishment alive, and a new sun block industry a la vampire protection league has been spawned.

And of course star university chemists are looking for that perfect sun block molecule that can be patented by big pharma.

And as soon as it is, I predict a surge in media interviews with skin cancer experts

Acid Rain on the Boreal Forest

In the seventies it was acid rain. Thousands of scientists from around the world (Northern Hemisphere) studied this most
pressing environmental problem on the planet. The boreal forest is the largest ecosystem on Earth and its millions of lakes
were reportedly being killed by acid from the sky.

Coal burning plants spewed out sulphides into the atmosphere causing the rain to be acidic. The acid rain was postulated to
acidify the soils and lakes in the boreal forest but the acidification was virtually impossible to detect. Pristine lakes in the
hearts of national parks had to be studied for decades in attempts to detect a statistically significant acidification.
Meanwhile the lakes and their watersheds were being destroyed by the cottage industry, agriculture, forestry, mining, over
fishing and tourism. None of the local and regional destruction was studied or exposed. Instead, scientists turned their gaze
to distant coal burning plants, atmospheric distribution, and postulated chemical reactions occurring in rain droplets.

One study found that the spawning in aquarium of one fish species was extremely sensitive to acidity (pH). Long treatises
about cation charge balance and transport were written and attention was diverted away from the destruction on the ground
towards a sanitized problem of atmospheric chemistry that was the result of industrialization and progress rather than being
caused by identifiable exploiters.

As a physicist and Earth scientist turned environmental scientist, I personally read virtually every single scientific paper
written about acid rain and could not find an example of a demonstrated negative impact on lakes or forests from acid rain.
In my opinion, contrary to the repeated claims of the scientist authors, the research on acid rain demonstrates that acid rain
could not possibly have been the problem.

This model of elite-forces-coordinated exploiter whitewashing was to play itself out on an even grander scale only decades
later with global warming.

Global Warming as a Threat to Humankind

n 2005 and 2006, several years before the November 2009 Climategate scandal burst the media bubble that buoyed public
opinion towards acceptance of carbon credits, cap and trade, and the associated trillion dollar finance bonanza that may still
come to pass, I exposed the global warming cooptation scam in an essay that Alexander Cockburn writing in The
Nation called "one of the best essays on greenhouse myth-making from a left perspective".
My essay prompted David F. Noble to research the question and write The Corporate Climate Coup to expose how the
media embrace followed the finance sectors realization of the unprecedented potential for revenues that going green could
represent.

Introductory paragraphs from Global Warming: Truth or Dare? are as follows:

I also advance that there are strong societal, institutional, and psychological motivations for having constructed
and for continuing to maintain the myth of a global warming dominant threat (global warming myth, for short). I
describe these motivations in terms of the workings of the scientific profession and of the global corporate and
finance network and its government shadows.

I argue that by far the most destructive force on the planet is power-driven financiers and profit-driven
corporations and their cartels backed by military might; and that the global warming myth is a red herring that
contributes to hiding this truth. In my opinion, activists who, using any justification, feed the global warming myth
have effectively been co-opted, or at best neutralized.

Other passages read this way:

Environmental scientists and government agencies get funding to study and monitor problems that do not threaten
corporate and financial interests. It is therefore no surprise that they would attack continental-scale devastation
from resource extraction via the CO2 back door. The main drawback with this strategy is that you cannot control a
hungry monster by asking it not to shit as much.

Global warming is strictly an imaginary problem of the First World middleclass. Nobody else cares about global
warming. Exploited factory workers in the Third World dont care about global warming. Depleted uranium
genetically mutilated children in Iraq dont care about global warming. Devastated aboriginal populations the world
over also cant relate to global warming, except maybe as representing the only solidarity that we might volunteer.
 Its not about limited resources. [The amount of money spent on pet food in the US and Europe each year equals
the additional amount needed to provide basic food and health care for all the people in poor countries, with a
sizeable amount left over.

(UN Human Development Report, 1999)] Its about exploitation, oppression, racism, power, and greed. Economic,
human, and animal justice brings economic sustainability which in turn is always based on renewable practices.

Recognizing the basic rights of native people automatically moderates resource extraction and preserves natural
habitats. Not permitting imperialist wars and interventions automatically quenches nation-scale exploitation. True
democratic control over monetary policy goes a long way in removing debt-based extortion. Etc.

And there is a thorough critique of the science as band wagon trumpeting and interested self-deception. Climategate only
confirms what should be obvious to any practicing scientist: That science is a mafia when its not simply a sleeping pill.

[Recent development (March 2011): Incisive deconstruction of the dominant climate science narrative - here.]

Conclusion

It just goes on and on. What is not a lie?

Look at the recent H1N1 scam another textbook example. Its farcical how far these circuses go:

Antiseptic gels in every doorway at the blink of an eye; high school students getting high from drinking the alcohol in the
gels; out datedness of the viral strain before the pre-paid vaccine can be mass produced; unproven effectiveness; no
requirement to prove effectiveness; government guarantees to corporate manufacturers against client lawsuits; university
safety officers teaching students how to cough; etc.

Pure madness. Has something triggered our genetically ingrained First World stupidity reflex? Is this part of our march
towards fascism?

Here is another one. Educators promote the lie that we learn because we are taught. This lie of education is squarely
denounced by radical educators.

University professors design curricula as though the students actually learn every element that is delivered whereas the
truth is that students dont learn the delivered material and everyone only learns what they learn. One could dramatically
change the order in which courses are delivered and it would make no measurable difference in how much students learn.
Students deliver nonsense and professors dont care. Obedience and indoctrination are all that matter so the only required
skill is bluffing. Students know this and those that dont dont know what they know, dont know themselves.

Pick any expert opinion or dominant paradigm: Its part of a racket.

We cant know the truth because the truth is brutal.

5 Cancer Myths Busted

February 10 2016 | From: WakingTimes

Cancer statistics are on the rise, and the growing numbers have moved the disease to a priority
issue for the global community.
As The Lancet reports, cancer deaths have increased 46% between 1990 and 2013. On Jan 1, 2016, new
international development priorities called Sustainable Development Goals, will focus on decreasing premature
deaths from non-communicable diseases by 2025.

PreventDisease recently reported 5 cancer facts the cancer industry promotes as myths, which are summarized below:

1. The rise in all types of cancer is due to modern diet, lifestyle, and environment. Records of lifespan prior to the
18th century are scarce, but in all records of studied prehistoric skeletons, only 200 cases of possible cancer have been
found. However, from 1900-2011, cancer deaths have increased 3 fold. One researcher found that in 80% of processed
food, 4 main ingredients are found which harm immunity: corn, wheat, soy, and meat.

2. Superfoods and herbs can prevent cancer. This is true in many cases.
In fact, there are 17 herbs and spices which in their own right are considered super-foods, and have been scientifically
proven to prevent and treat cancer.

3. Acidic diets cause cancer. Blood pH should be within a range of 7.3 to 7.41. If the pH is lower than that range,
acidosis occurs, which leads to central nervous system depression. Severe acidosis (below 7.0) can cause coma and death.
If the pH rises above 7.45, the result is alkalosis. Keeping the body closer to an alkaline state (up to .05) can make a
significant difference in cancer growth or suppression. Cancer cells cant live in an alkaline environment.

4. Sugar feeds cancer. A four-year study at the National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection in the
Netherlands compared 111 biliary tract cancer patients with 480 controls.
Cancer risk associated with the intake of sugars, independent of other energy sources, more than doubled for the cancer
patients. Another epidemiological study covering 21 modern countries (Europe, North America, Japan and others) found that
sugar intake is a strong risk factor for higher breast cancer rates, especially in older women.

5. Conventional cancer treatment kills more than it cures. Five year relative survival rates for cancer are standard
because after 5 years, many patients conditions worsen. More accurate long-term statistics would reflect ten years or more,
as well as data on cost-effectiveness, immune system impact, quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. When these factors are
considered, chemotherapy makes little to no contribution to cancer survival.

The stats dont lie. A problem is rising and we are releasing this information as a means of prevention and how we in our
own way can make life changing choices as a means of lessening the risk of becoming a statistic.

Things that are well known to help are: an organic diet, lessening the time spend in WI-FI environments, avoidance of
refined and hidden sugars, and if possible lessening stress.
For males, regular sexual intercourse is a proven benefactor for lessening prostate cancer and lowering anxiety; Fiery
Male can help in this area.

A strong immunity is important. T-cells should be kept at optimum levels, which can be helped with our Thymus gland,
and DMF Melatonin, which has been used in cancer studies.

Gut health is also important, as all disease begins in the gut. Our Full Spectrum Digestive Enzyme and Laktokhan can
benefit gut health tremendously. For endocrine support, try our Adrenal gland and Thyroid Support Homeopathic.

As you see, we have a lot we can do in order avoid sickness and disease, and the best defense is awareness and
prevention.

McDonalds Franchisees Say That The Business Is In Its Final Days

February 9 2016 | From: Ewao

Its no secret that McDonalds menu is not the healthiest food out there.
It seems that after Morgan Spurlocks independent film called Super Size Me was released back in 2004, which
documented his mental and physical health after eating only Mcdonalds food after a 30-day period, McDonalds
started to see a decline in the amount of people interested in eating at their establishment.

In more recent months, McDonalds have been losing favor from their customer base, as more of us are becoming aware of
what types of food we allow into our bodies. There has been an abundance of hype now about GMO food in general and
more people are quickly losing interest in consuming food that contains GMOs.

When interviewed about the condition and potential future of McDonalds, one of their employees made mention that the
company is in a deep depression and could be seeing its final days. Yet another employee stated that:

We are in the throes of a deep depression, and nothing is changing, and when on to say that probably 30% of
operators are insolvent.

We have come such a long way in seeking out healthier food alternatives. As more of us are becoming aware of how
unhealthy our food options are, we have insisted that we have healthier food, and in doing so businesses like McDonalds
are seeing a large decline in revenue. Why is that you might ask?

Its because they have chosen to stick with unhealthy food options while the rest of us strive for healthier options.
When asked why they thought the company was in the state that it was currently in, another employee had this to say on the
matter;

The CEO is sowing the seeds of our demise. We are a quick-serve fast-food restaurant, not a fast casual like Five
Guys or Chipotle. The system may be facing its final days.

A couple of McDonalds executives also chose to come to the table about the condition of their company and share with us
their concerns and views of their company, and said:

The lack of consistent leadership from Oak Brook is frightening, we continue to jump from one failed initiative to
another.

Another executive also made a comment about McDonalds;

I have been in this business since the early 1970s but have not seen us this leaderless in all my time. The system
is very lost at the moment. Our menu boards are still bloated, and we are still trying to be too many things to too
many people. Things are broken from the franchisee perspective.

Its not too hard to see that McDonalds is in a decline with no signs of getting better. I remember at one point, no matter
where I went, McDonalds establishments were always packed. From long lines at the drive-thru to packed eating areas on
the insides. Also, the play areas always had birthday parties going on. Yet now, as I go through town Mcdonalds is lucky to
have the few sparse customers that they have, even when they are positioned in high traffic areas, there is hardly anyone
there, even during busy hours.

To start off the year 2015, McDonalds would have to start by closing a whopping 700 of its locations, due to all of us simply
requesting that instead of super fancy building and sleekly designed menu boards, we just want healthier food. Due to the
leadership of McDonalds and its failed attempts to keep us consumers coming back, not only their local sales were seeing a
decline but their global ones as well.

In the beginning months of 2015, McDonalds had already seen a 28% drop in their overall operating revenue, and
additionally they saw a 2.3% decrease in their sales. For years, McDonalds has been experiencing a trending loss of their
overall revenue, and the way future looks for McDonalds, they may never recover.

At this rate McDonalds will be added to the list of entities that chose to continue to poison everyone with cheaply made or
synthesized food, and are now nonexistent, because instead of pushing to stay with the consciousness of its consumers, as
they seek for better food quality, chose the latter path and would rather become extinct instead of grow to something
amazing.

Effects And Implications For Consumers Of The Natural Health & Supplementary
Products Bill
February 6 2016 | From: Uncensored

A brief summary and extended discussion of the consequences of the pending Natural Health &
Supplementary Products Bill (formerly the Natural Health Products Bill) currently in Parliament.
This is a very complex Bill with many unacceptable aspects. Due to the need for brevity and clarity we have
restricted our comments mainly to aspects that will affect consumers.

Summary

The third reading of the Natural Health and Supplementary Products Bill is imminent. This Bill will ban most Natural Health
Product (NHP) ingredients without just cause.

NHPs in NZ are presently regulated under a Black-list (a short list of banned substances that have shown evidence of
harm). We currently have the right to consume any Natural Health ingredients not on the Black-list, which gives us access
to an unquantifiably high number of ingredients with no history of harm.

Under the new Bill this present Black-list approach will be replaced by a new White-list approach, with a very limited
White-list of permitted ingredients. Any ingredient that is not on this permitted White-list will not be allowed to be sold in
NZ

Many Natural Health Products will disappear if they contain even one ingredient that is not on their Permitted White-list.
Many suppliers will also disappear as a result.

Any NHP ingredient that is recognised as having therapeutic (health improving) effect can be re-classified as a medicine
by the MoH. Once it is classed as a medicine, it will be black-listed for use in Natural Health products. (This is already
happening)

There is no accountability for harm or death as a result of consumers losing healthcare products that they depend on.
There are no provisions in the Bill to make allowances for this if it does happen.

You can provide feedback to the Government on the Bill, sign a petition on www.Change.org and sign up with HFNZ for
updates on this important matter.

Discussion

The passing of the Natural Health and Supplementary Products Bill will result in many Natural Health Products becoming
either severely restricted (via new proposed low dosage limits), or being made outright illegal in NZ.
All of the following contain one or more ingredients that do not appear on the list provided by the Ministry of Health, meaning
consumers will no longer be able to purchase these products.

These are just a few examples that have been sent to us by consumers:

Liposomal Vit C,

Liposomal Glutathione,

Truehope EMPowerplus,

Hardy Nutritionals Daily Essential Nutrients,

5-HTP all products,

L-Methionine all products,

Metagenics Azeo-Pangen,

MediHerb TyAdren Support,

Pure Encapsulations Ascorbyl Palmitate,

Go Healthy Go Prostate Protect,

Syntol AMD,

Douglas Laboratories De-Mer-Tox,

Future Formulations Inner Healing.

We invite readers to contribute to this list by emailing us at Info@HealthFreedom.co.nz

Natural Health Practitioners will be unable to properly practice as they will no longer be able to prescribe to their patients
needs.

The Ministry has stated in the consultation document that products made by a practitioner for an individual patient will be
exempt from the Bill including Rongo Mori and Traditional Chinese Medicine but that these same products will not be
allowed to be sold over the counter.
However New Zealand Health Trusts interpretation of the Supplementary Order Paper (the most up-to-date version of the
Bill) differs from this entirely in that Mori health practitioners and others using traditional herbal and other remedies to
administer to an individual will be unable to use non-permitted ingredients.

We feel this is a classic example of how unreliable and misleading the Ministrys information is in relation to this Bill. To
make matters even more uncertain the Bill is crafted to allow most of the detail to be added AFTER the Bill has been
passed!

Products presently classified as Practitioner Only Range will not be exempt from the ingredient restrictions.

The proposed financing model of the new system presents significant risk to the majority of NZ small business supplement
manufacturers, an outcome likely to result in only a small handful of large manufacturers remaining viable. This will result in
a significant loss of variety of product in the natural supplements market in NZ.

The new regulatory system will be funded by industry on a Full Cost Recovery Basis by annual registration charges on all
products. Note that there have never been any registration charges before.

These charges will rise as the range of products decreases due to the White-list restrictions. Short run products will
become economically unviable and thus will be discontinued, forcing smaller operators to close.
Every time a manufacturer reduces its product range or closes its doors, the remaining products and remaining
manufacturers will have to shoulder more of the financial burden of funding the agency. The biggest players will benefit from
this approach, as they can afford the fees and this approach will increase their market share. This is one reason why large
manufacturers support this bill.

Presently in Australia under the TGA it costs manufacturers $40,000 $150,000 just to apply for one ingredient to be
accepted on their White-list, with no guarantee of success.

There is little incentive to make an application because, if successful, a manufacturers competitors are able to benefit at no
cost to them. And as only one or two ingredients per year have ever been passed by the TGA, manufacturers are
discouraged from even trying. There is no reason to believe that this will not also apply here in NZ should the Bill be passed.

The Pharma based single ingredient approach, which is the framework of the Bill, is inappropriate and misleading
for two reasons:

1. It does not reflect the fact that when NHP ingredients are consumed together, higher doses can be safely tolerated
above the consumption of a single ingredient.

2. If any one ingredient in a product exceeds a specified dose, then the entire product will be outlawed in NZ. Most
supplements have multiple ingredients, affecting a huge number of supplements that New Zealanders are already relying on
for their health and well-being.
The Bill will allow Medsafe (the business unit of the Ministry of Health) to increase its control over NHPs by the
following means:

It will reverse the basic historic principle confirming our rights to consume any natural health ingredient that is absent from
a short defined Black-list of substances where there is robust evidence of harm.

The number of ingredients we can currently access is too high to quantify, yet no deaths have been attributed to these
ingredients or products (see No Deaths from Supplements. No Deaths from Minerals. No Deaths from Amino Acids. No
Deaths from Herbs http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v12n02.shtml)

Our present system will be replaced by a White-list of permitted ingredients and only ingredients on this list will be sold in
NZ. Furthermore, many permitted ingredients have severe dosage and application restrictions placed upon them. There is
no scientific reasoning or justification for such limitations, and no history of risk to human health.

The proposed White-list currently contains 5,545 ingredients. This may sound like a lot, but to indicate what this means in
terms of what we stand to lose, we only need to add up a small handful of the numerous categories of currently permitted
ingredients to appreciate the magnitude of loss. There are so far over 8,000 identified Polyphenols, over 3,000 Enzymes
and over 12,000 Medicinal Plants. These few examples alone make it easy to see that only a small fraction of our current
range of natural ingredients will remain, should this legislation be enacted.

Permitted Ingredients White-list File

It is vitally important for you to check if any ingredients that you presently use in your supplements are not on the permitted
list.
Which ingredients do YOU rely on? Check them out here. Or here in Excel spreadsheet form.

You can search the file by entering the ingredient name, or searching alphabetically in the Excel Spreadsheet. If the
ingredient is not on the list at all, then it will not be permitted in over-the-counter products. Also check the maximum
permitted daily dose, and whether it will be permitted for internal or external application only.

What the Columns Mean

In the Outcome column

- Y means Permitted (but make sure you check the maximum permitted amount, and the application, e.g. Glutathione (an
important antioxidant) is permitted, but only for applying to the skin),
- N means Unaccepted,
- U means Under Review.

If the Reason column states rejected by IJEACCM on safety grounds IJEACCM stands for The Interim Joint Expert
Advisory Committee on Complementary Medicines, a NZ/Australian initiative.

What is the Background to this Bill?

There has been a de facto pharmaceutical monopoly on medicines for almost 100 years.

When we become ill we need medicines. But pharmaceutical medicines are dangerous and can cause substantial harm.

The monopoly has endured and grown stronger due to laws that have been passed. There have been many discoveries
made over those 100 years that offered safer, cheaper and more effective treatments than the pharmaceutical options, but
the regulators have always stepped in to prosecute, confiscate product and even imprison the people who made or used the
discovery.
Very occasionally the regulators attempts to destroy a new discovery are not completely successful, and a natural
alternative flourishes for a few years. But the Big Pharma lobbyists respond and it doesnt take long for new laws to be
drafted that strengthen the monopoly and the status quo remains.

We cant prevent Big Pharma and their lobbyists from trying to maintain and strengthen their position. They are very much
aware of the impact that an appropriately regulated Natural Health Product industry would have on their market share. They
have a duty to their shareholders to prevent natural medicines from entering the market.

But our elected MPs need to wake up and stop passing such laws. The Natural Health and Supplementary Products
Bill is Pharma-based and hostile to the interests of the consumer and the Natural Health industry.

Consumers stand to be the biggest losers if this Bill is passed. There are many importers, manufacturers and re-sellers who
do not oppose the bill for fear of retribution, as a lot of the fine print will be decided after it has been passed. They hope to
be able to stay in business with reduced ranges and less effective products.
Consumers on the other hand, stand to lose access to life saving Natural Health Products.

NHPs can save lives in several ways, from helping people to stay well so the need for pharmaceutical intervention doesnt
arise (the death toll from adverse reactions to properly prescribed pharmaceutical medicines is over 100,000 a year
in the USA alone) to products that are capable of returning seriously ill people back to good health.

Health Freedom NZ supports the aims and proposed legislative model of the New Zealand Health Trust. Their mission is to
ensure that the consumer comes first in all health regulation, and that Natural Health should be regulated through a stand-
alone regulator, not as a division of a larger pharmaceutical or food regulator. When you run this bill through the NZHT
checklist of appropriate regulation it fails on every count.

What Can You Do?

This Bill will soon have its third and final reading to become law, and is expected to take effect around June 2016. The
Regulations are expected to come into force shortly afterwards.

The Government is asking for public feedback on the Bill

The consultation document contains a list of 47 questions and a consultation submission can be filled out online.

However HFNZ recommends that the questions should not be answered because the regime is fundamentally flawed and
engaging in the detail implicitly validates this unsuitable regulatory model.

For those who have limited time to prepare a submission and wish to oppose the Bill in principle, click the link below for a
short pre-prepared submission. We recommend you personalise your submission as much as possible.

SEND submissions to naturalhealthproducts@moh.govt.nz

Should you require additional time to make a submission, you should request an extension of time from the
Ministry:

1. Submissions on the Consultation Document close at 5pm on Friday 4 March 2016

2. Submissions on the Draft List of Conditions about which a claim can be made & the Draft Permitted List will
open on 6 Feb 2016 and close on 31 May 2016.
You can make a submission by emailing: naturalhealthproducts@moh.govt.nz

Or by posting your submission to:

Natural Health Products

Ministry of Health
PO Box 5013
Wellington 6145

Sign and Share the Petition Started by Professor Julia Rucklidge

This is on www.Change.org. Simply add your first name, last name, email, city (and reason if you like) to the text box on the
right of the page, then click Sign. https://www.change.org/p/naturalhealthproducts-moh-govt-nz-keep-access-to-nutrients-in-
nz-that-have-a-proven-safety-record-and-therapeutic-benefit

We invite all consumers who want to be kept informed of developments and help to save our right of access to
Natural Health ingredients to sign up for the Health Freedom Newsletter.

We Are Eating Ourselves Insane: Causes Of Mental Insanity Identified In Factory

Foods
February 5 2016 | From: NaturalNews

I've spent the last two years running a heavy metals analysis science lab (labs.naturalnews.com)
and writing a detailed, heavily researched book on forensic food analysis.

To my horror, I've come to the conclusion from all this that humanity is driving itself insane with relentless
chemical contamination and heavy metals pollution that's driving human minds to clinical madness.
The real reason society is so incredibly insane at every level is rooted in the consumption of toxic heavy metals through
food, water and other environmental sources. It's exacerbated by the poisonous heavy metals being fed to factory farmed
chickens (and other animals) whose poop is harvested and spread on soils that are used to grow foods for humans.

Once humans eat the contaminated food that's laced with lead, cadmium, mercury and arsenic, their own feces is "recycled"
and turned into "bio solids" that are placed back onto commercial farm lands as "fertilizer."

This cycle of metals accumulation results in a steady rise in the concentration of toxic substances in our environment and
foods. As people consume these foods (and other toxic substances such as mercury in dental fillings and fluoride in
municipal water supplies), they are driven to the brink of madness.

It is these people who are now the voters, the politicians, the media personalities and the decision makers. The modern
world of western civilization has literally gone insane, much like the Roman Empire which fed its own people water that was,
unbeknownst to them, poisoned with lead.

The lead in the water of Flint, Michigan only worsens the problem... and it's not just Flint, either. I've found that nearly every
state government in America routinely covers up the toxicity of public water, and the EPA is also heavily engaged in
suppressing the scientific truth about lead in municipal water supplies.

As a result, people are drinking toxic lead at alarming concentrations, and they're eating arsenic, inhaling mercury and
consuming significant concentrations of cadmium from other food sources that I'll be detailing this year in my new, expanded
lab facility.
Whos Behind The Zika Virus Outbreak & Fearmongering?
February 1 2016 | From: Geopolitics / Various

Theyve been through A with AIDS, C with cancer, D with diabetes, E with Ebola, H1N1, superbugs,
etc. Now, they are down to Z with Zika virus.
Heres the fear mongering channeled through Reuters;

"There is no treatment for Zika infection.

Efforts to combat Zika are focused on protecting people from being bitten and on eradicating mosquitoes, a tough
task in many parts of Latin America, where people live in poverty and there are plentiful breeding grounds for the
insect.

We do not have a vaccine for Zika yet. The only thing we can do is fight the mosquito, Brazilian President Dilma
Rousseff said on Friday, reiterating her call for a national eradication effort.

Rousseff said tests for the development of a vaccine would begin next week at the Butantan Institute, one of
Brazils leading biomedical research centers in Sao Paulo.

U.S. President Barack Obama spoke on Friday with Rousseff about the spread of the virus, the White House said.

The leaders agreed on the importance of collaborative efforts to deepen our knowledge, advance research and
accelerate work to develop better vaccines and other technologies to control the virus, the White House said in
a statement.

Zika has hit Brazil just as it prepares to host the Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro on Aug. 5-21, an event that
draws hundreds of thousands of athletes, team officials and spectators. The International Olympic Committee
(IOC) assured teams on Friday the Olympics would be safe from Zika, but urged visitors to carefully protect
themselves.

U.S. lawmakers have begun to press the Obama administration for details of its response to Zika. At least 31
people in the country have been infected, all of them after travel to affected countries.
We should not just be looking at the issue from the standpoint of healthcare only but also from its geopolitical implications.
Because, as always, the enemies of humanity do have the skills, capability and appetite for inflicting pain and suffering into
many aspects of our existence.

With bioweapon Zika virus, they can:

Shake up one of the pillars of the BRICS Collective, i.e. Brazils economy, to hasten its fall from grace [here, here,
and here];

Continue thinning the herd through mass sterilizations via birth control virus-tainted vaccines in pursuant to their
upgraded United Nations Sustainable Agenda 2030, and;

Continue profiting from sales of more vaccines.

The development and spread of the Zika virus in Brazil is never an act of nature.

Zika Outbreak Epicenter in Same Area Where GM Mosquitoes Were Released in 2015

The World Health Organization announced it will convene an Emergency Committee under International Health Regulations
on Monday, February 1, concerning the Zika virus explosive spread throughout the Americas. The virus reportedly has the
potential to reach pandemic proportions - possibly around the globe. But understanding why this outbreak happened is vital
to curbing it. As the WHO statement said:

A causal relationship between Zika virus infection and birth malformations and neurological syndromes is strongly
suspected. [These links] have rapidly changed the risk profile of Zika, from a mild threat to one of alarming proportions.

WHO is deeply concerned about this rapidly evolving situation for 4 main reasons: the possible association of infection with
birth malformations and neurological syndromes; the potential for further international spread given the wide geographical
distribution of the mosquito vector; the lack of population immunity in newly affected areas; and the absence of vaccines,
specific treatments, and rapid diagnostic tests []
The level of concern is high, as is the level of uncertainty.

Zika seemingly exploded out of nowhere. Though it was first discovered in 1947, cases only sporadically occurred
throughout Africa and southern Asia. In 2007, the first case was reported in the Pacific. In 2013, a smattering of small
outbreaks and individual cases were officially documented in Africa and the western Pacific. They also began showing up in
the Americas. In May 2015, Brazil reported its first case of Zika virus - and the situation changed dramatically.

Brazil is now considered the epicenter of the Zika outbreak, which coincides with at least 4,000 reports of babies born
with microcephaly just since October.

When examining a rapidly expanding potential pandemic, its necessary to leave no stone unturned so possible solutions, as
well as future prevention, will be as effective as possible. In that vein, there was another significant development in 2015.
Oxitec first unveiled its large-scale, genetically-modified mosquito farm in Brazil in July 2012, with the goal of reducing the
incidence of dengue fever, as The Disease Daily reported. Dengue fever is spread by the same Aedes mosquitoes which
spread the Zika virus - and though they cannot fly more than 400 meters, WHO stated, it may inadvertently be transported
by humans from one place to another.

By July 2015, shortly after the GM mosquitoes were first released into the wild in Juazeiro, Brazil, Oxitec
proudly announced they had successfully controlled the Aedes aegypti mosquito that spreads dengue fever, chikungunya
and zika virus, by reducing the target population by more than 90%.

Though that might sound like an astounding success - and, arguably, it was - there is an alarming possibility to consider.

Nature, as one Redditor keenly pointed out, finds a way - and the effort to control dengue, zika, and other viruses, appears
to have backfired dramatically.

Juazeiro, Brazil was the location where genetically-modified mosquitoes were first released into the wild.
The particular strain of Oxitec GM mosquitoes, OX513A, are genetically altered so the vast majority of their offspring will die
before they mature - though Dr. Ricarda Steinbrecher published concerns in a report in September 2010 that a known
survival rate of 3-4 percent warranted further study before the release of the GM insects. Her concerns, which were echoed
by several other scientists both at the time and since, appear to have been ignored - though they should not have been.

Those genetically-modified mosquitoes work to control wild, potentially disease-carrying populations in a very specific
manner. Only the male modified Aedes mosquitoes are supposed to be released into the wild - as they will mate with their
unaltered female counterparts. Once offspring are produced, the modified, scientific facet is supposed to kick in and kill that
larvae before it reaches breeding age - if tetracycline is not present during its development. But there is a problem.

According to an unclassified document from the Trade and Agriculture Directorate Committee for Agriculture dated February
2015, Brazil is the third largest in global antimicrobial consumption in food animal production - meaning, Brazil is third in
the world for its use of tetracycline in its food animals.

As a study by the American Society of Agronomy, et. al., explained;

It is estimated that approximately 75% of antibiotics are not absorbed by animals and are excreted in waste.

One of the antibiotics (or antimicrobials) specifically named in that report for its environmental persistence is tetracycline.

In fact, as a confidential internal Oxitec document divulged in 2012, that survival rate could be as high as 15% - even with
low levels of tetracycline present. Even small amounts of tetracycline can repress the engineered lethality. Indeed, that
15% survival rate was described by Oxitec:

After a lot of testing and comparing experimental design, it was found that [researchers] had used a cat food to feed the
[OX513A] larvae and this cat food contained chicken. It is known that tetracycline is routinely used to prevent infections in
chickens, especially in the cheap, mass produced, chicken used for animal food.
Is that you Liz?

The chicken is heat-treated before being used, but this does not remove all the tetracycline. This meant that a small amount
of tetracycline was being added from the food to the larvae and repressing the [designed] lethal system.

Even absent this tetracycline, as Steinbrecher explained, a sub-population of genetically-modified Aedes mosquitoes could
theoretically develop and thrive, in theory;

"Capable of surviving and flourishing despite any further releases of pure GM mosquitoes which still have that
gene intact. She added, the effectiveness of the system also depends on the [genetically-designed] late onset of
the lethality. If the time of onset is altered due to environmental conditions then a 3-4% [survival rate] represents
a much bigger problem

As the WHO stated in its press release, Conditions associated with this years El Nino weather pattern are
expected to increase mosquito populations greatly in many areas.

Incidentally, President Obama called for a massive research effort to develop a vaccine for the Zika virus, as one does not
currently exist. Brazil has now called in 200,000 soldiers to somehow help combat the virus spread. Aedes mosquitoes
have reportedly been spotted in the U.K. But perhaps the most ironic - or not - proposition was proffered on January 19, by
the MIT Technology Review:

An outbreak in the Western Hemisphere could give countries including the United States new reasons to try wiping out
mosquitoes with genetic engineering. Yesterday, the Brazilian city of Piracicaba said it would expand the use of genetically
modified mosquitoes
The GM mosquitoes were created by Oxitec, a British company recently purchased by Intrexon, a synthetic biology
company based in Maryland. The company said it has released bugs in parts of Brazil and the Cayman Islands to battle
dengue fever.

Heres more to the Zika story

Zika Freakout: The Hoax and the Covert Op Continue

Thanks to reporters and researchers Jim Stone, Kathy Ford, the fullerton informer, Jim West, Martin Maloney, and Claus
Jensen, who have moved this story forward and exposed the scam.

If you want to hide anything on this planet, twist it into a (fake) story about a virus. Youre home free.

This is my second article on the Zika-virus scam (article archive here). Ive been to these rodeos before: HIV, West Nile,
Swine Flu, SARS, Ebola. In each case, a virus is blamed for illness and death that actually arises from other causes.
The Zika virus, now being blamed for the birth of babies with very small heads and impaired brains, has been around for a
long time - late 1940s, early 1950s - and suddenly, without warning or reason, after inducing, at best, mild illness, its
producing horrendous damage? This is called a clue. A clue that scientific liars are lying. Furthermore, many of the women
who are giving birth to deformed babies test negative for the presence of the Zika Virus.

So, what is causing babies to be born with very small heads and brain damage? While researching my first book in 1987-
8, AIDS INC., I concluded: dont assume there is only one cause for illness. That can be very misleading. Various factors
can combine to produce disease and death.

For example, in the case of this Zika phenomenon:

One: Pesticide use in Brazil:

Brazil, the center of the Zika crisis, uses more pesticides than any nation in the world. Some of these are banned in 22
other countries. And as for babies born with smaller heads, here is a study from Environmental Health Perspectives (July 1,
2011), Urinary Biomarkers of Prenatal Atrazine Exposure:

"The presence versus absence of quantifiable levels of [the pesticide] atrazine or a specific atrazine metabolite
was associated with fetal growth restriction and small head circumference Head circumference was also
inversely associated with the presence of the herbicide metolachlor. (emphasis added)

Atrazine and metolachlor are both used in Brazil.

Two: The TdaP vaccine:

This is a case of suspicious correlation. A study posted in the US National Library of Medicine, Pertussis in young infants: a
severe vaccine-preventable disease, spells it out:
 in late 2014, the [Brazilian] Ministry of Health announced the introduction of the Tdap vaccine for all pregnant
women in Brazil.

Obviously, pregnant women are the target group; they are giving birth to babies with smaller heads and brain damage, and
the recommendation for them to take the vaccine was recent; 2014.

Barbara Loe Fisher, of the National Vaccine Information Center, writes:

"Drug companies did not test the safety and effectiveness of giving influenza or Tdap vaccine to pregnant women
before the vaccines were licensed in the U.S and there is almost no data on inflammatory or other biological
responses to these vaccines that could affect pregnancy and birth outcomes

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) lists influenza and Tdap vaccines as either Pregnancy Category B or C
biologicals which means that adequate testing has not been done in humans to demonstrate safety for pregnant
women and it is not known whether the vaccines can cause fetal harm or affect reproduction capacity.

The manufacturers of influenza and Tdap vaccines state that human toxicity and fertility studies are
inadequate and warn that the influenza and Tdap vaccines should be given to a pregnant woman only if
clearly needed. (emphasis added)

Three: Genetically engineered mosquitoes that have already been released in Brazil to combat
dengue fever - a project implemented by Oxitec, a company supplied with grant money from Bill
Gates:

A town in Brazil has reported continuing elevated levels of dengue fever since the GE (genetically engineered) mosquitoes
have been introduced to combat that disease.

The scientific hypothesis is: the trickster GE bugs (males) will impregnate natural females, but no actual next generation will
occur beyond the larval stage. However, this plummeting birth rate in mosquitoes is the only proof that the grand
experiment is safe. No long-term health studies have been done - this is a mirror of what happened when GMO crops were
introduced:

No science, just bland assurances.

Needless to say, without extensive lab testing, there is no way to tell what toxic elements these GE mosquitoes may actually
be harboring, in addition to what researchers claim. Thats a major red flag.

Wherever these GE mosquitoes have been introduced, or are about to be introduced, the human populations have not been
consulted for their permission. Its all being done by government and corporate edict. Its human experimentation on a grand
scale.

Four: Pesticide manufacturing in Brazil:

Reuters, May 19, 2015, Brazil prosecutors seek $16 million from pesticide makers:

"Brazilian prosecutors said on Monday they would seek at least 50 million reais ($16.6 million) from multinational
pesticide manufacturers for alleged safety violations at a collection facility for used pesticide containers

Those manufacturers, prosecutors said, include the Brazilian units of BASF, DuPont, Monsanto, Nufarm,
Syngenta, Adama, FMC and Nortox

The charges come as scientists, regulators, public health officials and consumers increasingly complain that
Brazils ascent as an agricultural powerhouse has led to unsafe and excessive use of pesticides. Reuters reported
in April that at least four foreign manufacturers sell pesticides in Brazil that they are not allowed to sell in
their home markets. (emphasis added)

How convenient for these corporate giants to evade blame for horrific birth effectsout of nowhere a virus is touted as the
cause.
 Five: Severe and endemic malnutrition, lack of basic sanitation, and grinding poverty:

These are major factors in all illness and death, in the areas where they are prevalent (e.g., major parts of Brazil).
Suppression of the immune system is the result, and anything that then comes down the pipeline, germs or manmade toxic
substances, become catastrophic to the body.

Six: Anti-Mosquito Sprays:

The Guardian, January 26, 2015, "Brazil is badly losing the battle against Zika virus, says health minister":

Sprays are now being given out to 400,000 pregnant women in Brazil. Naturally, the sprays are toxic. What better way to
multiply the attack on mothers and their unborn children? For example, widely used organophosphates in sprays can be
highly disruptive to the nervous system.

Some or all of these six elements Ive listed, in combination, form a sustained attack on human life. And as I keep
stressing, the virus becomes the formidable cover story that conceals the truth.

And dont forget the Rio Olympic Games, coming up in August. There are multiple scenarios which could play out in front of
a global television audience. Will Zika be pushed as some sort of worldwide pandemic? Will a Zika vaccine be magically
discovered and rushed into production, in time to show (as an advertisement) lines of people dutifully trudging up to
receive shots?

Every fake epidemic is, in part, designed to create fear and induce blind compliance to medical and government dictates.
The germ is positioned as the tiny terrorist in this stage play.

In my first book, AIDS INC. (1988), I indicated that covert medical ops are the most dangerous, because they appear to be
politically neutral, they fly under no flag, and they claim to forward only humanitarian aims. But in fact, modern Rockefeller
Medicine is built as a vast partner in the Globalization of the planet.

Its vision is a universal in-utero-to-cradle-to-grave system for the human race: every human walks a bleak lifelong path of
disease-diagnosis after diagnosis, receiving toxic drugs and vaccines at every turn, which weaken his body and mind, and
make him unable to consider what is happening outside his perimeter of suffering or resist political totalitarianism.
Medical freedom means: the freedom to refuse medical care, and its based on knowledge of destructive effects. This
freedom must win, against any odds.

Official science is a contradiction in terms, and a grand illusion. (To read about Jons mega-collection, Power Outside The
Matrix, click here.)

Like all other outbreaks before, we are calling this one just another fear mongering to divert our attention from more pressing
global issues and for what they are about to do.

We already have the effective means to defeat any known and unknown viral infections.

We can mitigate the effects of any chemicals and neutralized all types of parasites without using highly toxic drugs and
expensive procedures, but only with a very simple and complete protocol that defeats all known and unknown diseases for
good, without any long-term side-effects. Find more about it here.

Why Heating Food With Microwave Radiation Is Harmful To Your Health

January 31 2016 | From: EnergyFanatics

A few decades from now, will it be common knowledge that using microwave radiation to heat food
is harmful to human health?

Its certainly a possibility, and information is already emerging which shows cause for concern.

Microwaves work by causing water molecules to resonate at very high frequencies, converting them into steam and thereby
heating your food. While this might be a convenient way to prepare your food, using microwave radiation in this way actually
changes the chemical structure of that food.

The fact that they are approved as safe doesnt mean much these days, as weve seen with several other examples from
Tobacco, PCBs and Asbestos and Glyphosate. Just because a government agency, like the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), or a government health agency approves something as safe, doesnt necessarily mean its safe.
You might be wondering how this is any different from heating your food on the stove or steaming it, and thats a fair
question. The difference is that microwaves deform and distort the molecules in food, while conventional heating methods
do not.

This is problematic in the medical field as well. We know, for example, that during blood transfusions, microwaves are often
used to heat the blood before it is transferred to the patient. But using microwave radiation to this actually damages
components found in blood. In fact, one woman even died after receiving a blood transfusion of microwaved blood. (source)

It is starting to look like microwaving can completely rid your food of most essential nutrients, but more research on this
phenomenon needs to be done. That being said, there are some publications we can refer to if youd like to find out more
information regarding the harmful effects of microwaves on nutrients.

One example comes from 2003. A study published in The Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture examined what
microwaves do to broccoli, finding that broccoli, after being microwaved, lost up to 97 percent of its beneficial antioxidants.
By comparison, when researchers steamed broccoli, they discovered that it only lost 11 percent or fewer of its antioxidants.
(source)

A study out of Australia showed that microwaves cause a greater level of protein unfolding than conventional heating. It
found that;

"Microwaves cause a significantly higher degree of unfolding than conventional thermal stress for protein solutions
heating to the same maximum temperature. (source)

A study using garlic found that just 60 seconds in a microwave can render its principle active ingredient (alliinase) as
useless. Microwaves have also been found to destroy immune-boosting agents that are found in breast milk. These are
disease fighting nutrients which are essential to the health and development of the child.

For example, one study found that microwaving breast milk caused a decrease in lysozyme activity and antibodies, and
aided the growth of more pathogenic bacteria. (source) The interesting thing about this study is that the researchers found
that more damage was done to the milk from microwaving compared to any other method of heating.

"Microwaving appears to be contraindicated at high-temperatures, and questions regarding its safety even exist at
low temperatures. (source)

A Japanese study found that only 6 minutes of microwave heating turned approximately 40 percent of the B12 found in milk
dead and completely void of any nutritional value. (source)

Three recent studies of historical food composition have shown up to 40 percent declines in some of the minerals commonly
found in fresh produce, and another one found the same thing for their protein source. (source)

A Scandinavian study conducted in 1999 also found that cooking asparagus in the microwave results in a reduction in
vitamins. (Kidmose U and Kaack K. Acta. Agriculturae Scandinavica B1999:49(2).110-117.)

What Type of Container Are You Using To Microwave Your Food?

Not heating your food in plastic containers should be a no brainer at this point. This is precisely why the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) recommends that any plastic containers should be labelled for microwave use, but even if they are
labeled as safe, its still probably not a good idea. For more more information on what happens when you microwave your
food in plastic containers, you can check out this article.

Many studies have shown that multiple plastic products contain various hormone disrupting chemicals, and heat is the worst
culprit when it comes to increasing the rate of chemical transfer from the container to your food.

As written in the journal Toxicology Letters:

Using a sensitive and quantitative competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, BPA was found to migrate
from polycarbonate water bottle at rates ranging from 0.20 ng/h to 0.79/h. . . . At room temperature the migration of
BPA was independent of whether or not the bottle had been perviously used. Exposure to boiling water increased
the rate of BPA migration by up to 55-fold.
Again, heat increases chemical leaching, so be cautious of what you use to heat your food. Even plastic containers which
are labelled as microwave safe (or even BPA free, which does not account for other worrisome chemicals) are still
dangerous.

According to the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC):

"What the term microwave-safe basically means is that any chemicals leaching from the container into food do so
at levels far below those shown to have any health effects.

There is cause to be wary of this claim, however. In particular, #7 polycarbonate plastic should not be used in a
microwave, even if it is labeled microwave-safe, because it leaches hormone-disrupting bisphenol A (BPA),
especially when heated. (source)

This may be frightening to consider, but examining the products we choose to use on a daily basis is important. We have
seen many examples in recent human history of information coming to light about a product or drug which completely
changes our understanding and attitude towards it. We only have to look at cigarettes to see the proof of that.

'CYFS Need To Listen To Carers'

January 28 2016 | From: RadioNewZealand

A Porirua family took in a baby so neglected he showed no emotion. Now he's full of life. They also
took in a baby born at 25 weeks and turned her into a happy, healthy wee girl who's off to school
soon.
And because they've taken on the children permanently - giving both them and the children the security of knowing
they have a family for life - they lose all Child Youth and Family Service (CYFS) support and allowances and receive
just $19 a day per child from Work and Income.

They can't change the children's surnames, they can't take them out of the country without permission and, if their birth
parents want contact, they have to make it happen.

"So why would anyone sane do that?" carer Jude Pointon says.

"The only people who would do that are people who have had a background like mine [Jude was fostered and
adopted as a child], who have gained through having a background in fostering or adoption."

In his first annual report on CYFs, State of Care 2015, released today, Children's Commissioner Russell Wills found
systemic failures in the service and said it was doubtful children were better off in state care.

He strongly criticised CYF for what he calls a "dump and run" culture of neglect.

Read the full report here.

Jude and her husband have first-hand experience of that culture.

Before they became permanency carers, they fostered children and Jude tells of having siblings aged one and three in their
care for two months, who then had to go back to their parents for a few days because CYF didn't have its court documents
in order.

"I said 'what do I tell them? They need to know what's happening,' and they said 'tell them they're going for a ride
in the car'.

"So I had an absolute hissy fit ... and said 'that's not okay, the system is making me into a long line of adults who
have failed these children and we're creating this country's future criminals and they have been let down over and
over and over again'."

Jude told the social worker they would have the kids back when the situation was sorted, but, she says, because she had
spoken her mind the children were sent to another home.

So it was a three-year-old's fourth foster home and it was a one-year-old's second foster home.

And that happens over and over again," she says.

Jude's sister - a social worker and CYF emergency care foster parent - recently had two children arrive in the middle of the
night. They were with her for a few days but then weren't returned after school one day.

"She was told 'they've gone to another placement' and she said 'well that's really not okay because they were told
they were coming here, they've had an unsettling time and suddenly they're not coming here, they're going
somewhere else they don't know, again and all their precious belongings that they've managed to take from their
home are here'."

Those belongings might just be a teddy bear or a book but to a child with nothing they are everything.
We have a serious national problem here in New Zealand with child abuse and satanic paedophile organisations. It is hideous to comprehend, but
the reality has to be faced - and those responsible, and even those that have been commiting these crimes for over 50 years - should know that they
will be held to account for their heinous actions.

Social workers shocked. Jude's sister arranged a meeting with about 20 Porirua social workers and she, Jude and another
foster parent told them what was wrong with the system.

"Some of them were actually shocked to hear from a carer's perspective how it feels to the carer and the
children," she says.

"It makes me annoyed because the foster carers and the permanency carers are the experts. Sure, the children
who have been who've been through the system are the experts but often they're too young to put across
coherently their point of view.

We know what's wrong with the system. We're happy to tell you. We're happy to tell the policymakers. I'm happy to
talk to the minister. Listen to us."

And that, simply, is Jude's message to the powers that be who want to fix the care system.

"Listen to the foster carers and ... the permanency carers, because we are here every day dealing with it every
day, and we know what can be done to try and fix the situation and make it work for these vulnerable children.

It really infuriates me when I hear on all media people talking about CYFs looking after these children. CYFs don't
have some big warehouse somewhere with all these children slotted in it, it's actually families who are looking after
 these children who are often damaged, going out of their way to try and help these children have as normal a life
as they can given the neglect they've had to start with.

It's like we're these invisible people."

The "Minister" Must Step Up

Former ward of the state Tracey said the State care system was broken beyond repair.

Tracey was removed from her family in the late 1970s when she was 11 because of abuse and said she lost track of how
many foster homes she lived in.

She told Checkpoint nothing has changed.

"They've lost track of over 1000 children - they don't know where they are, what's happened to them.

"How can you lose 1000 kids? The Minister of Social Welfare is their guardian, is their parent, so that person has
better step up and look after these kids."

Tracey said society would have to live with the consequences if children in care were not properly looked after.
Another former ward of the State, Tupua Urlich, said more support was needed for people when they left care.

Mr Urlich said although he felt like a prisoner when he was in care, he had no support when he left and developed alcohol
and drug problems. He also tried to take his own life.

People needed a home environment to fall back on well into their 20s.

"The average age of leaving home in New Zealand is 23. You have the luxury of being at home, parents helping
you out," he said.

"I know some people will hear this and think 'I didn't do that for my children' - sure but at least they knew they had
the option of going home, getting their washing done, getting given a meal or support, real important things."

Mr Urlich now works with child support group the Dingwall Trust.

Related:

Kids probably no better off in state care

CYF calls review after fatal dairy robbery

Minister affirms need for CYF overhaul

Dismay at lack of Maori on CYF review panel

Immunity: The Emerging Truth
January 26 2016 | From: KellyBroganMD

In Humble Awe of Human Complexity;

Eastern wisdom tells us that when we think we know, we dont. But when we admit ignorance, we achieve
enlightenment.

The most profound part of my departure from conventional medicine has been the depths of my surrender to all that we do
not, cannot, and must not understand about the body and its experience. Humble awe and wonder are truly the only
appropriate states for approaching the complexity of the human condition.

I have sought to validate my intuition around the hubris of our efforts to outsmart nature, through the available scientific
literature. We are suffering from our dualistic perspectives: human vs germs, body vs. disease, I vs me.

Disconnected Medicine: A Departure from Intuition

Vicki Noble, in Shakti Woman, a manifesto on our past 4,000 years of patriarchal society, which has served to suppress our
deep power of feminine intuition and connection to the natural world, states:

Western medicine tends to separate the parts of the human body into isolated units, as if they did not belong to
something whole. Some malfunction of the heart or the elbow is treated as if it were a discrete segment, unaffected
by the rest, with which something has gone wrong that needs to be fixed.

The doctor is the professional expert who is called in to do the fixing, and he learns how to do this not through his
own experience of his own body but by reading books and cutting up corpses. Then to further complicate things,
Western psychology separated the mind from the body and treats them as if they also had almost no relation to
each other, holding that their ideal relationship is mind over matter.

Western thinking in general, supported by Western religion, describes human beings as separate and distinct from
Nature and the rest of the animals on earth, with permission to dominate.
Vaccinations: An Ego Driven Effort

So, if we can acknowledge that domination is an ego-driven exercise in generating a sense of safety and security that will
only result in further peril and instability, we must examine some of the most egregious examples of this effort. We must look
at the only pharmaceutical product that is recommended (to the point of mandate) to every human on earth, with near
comically narrow exceptions.

We must look at the beliefs the fantasies underpinning the creation of the vaccine, the simple play on the vulnerable
human psyche, and those who stand to accrue power and wealth at the expense of the pawns in the game.

The belief, at its core, is that germs are bad, they kill us if they get near, in, or on us, and we have the know-how to
not only defeat them, but to annihilate them forever.

We are acculturated to this belief through corporations and enmeshed government agencies. They tell us that we cannot
trust ourselves, the wisdom of our bodies, or our collective experience, to tell us how to be safe and well. The companies
that stand to profit from this distrust, are the very ones who have convinced you that you are in danger. The fox is feasting in
the hen house.

Rediscovery of the Microbiome

Our dawning awareness of the microbiome has changed everything. It has been a discovery process that is almost like a
poetic remembering of our past wisdom. Given our knowledge that microbes comprise more of what we perceive to be us,
than human cells do, the only reasonable course of action is abandon all current efforts toward the prevention of infectious
disease that were based on a war against germs.
We must acknowledge that we misapprehended germs as other, when they are in fact necessary. We must see that we
have plainly missed the mark, and that our best intentions to protect men, women, and children, have made them sicker,
and all the more vulnerable to chronic illness.

Game Changers in the Prevention of Infectious Disease

Here are some of the (should-be) game changers that bring the modern application of infectious disease prevention and
treatment to a screeching halt:

Virome: Thought to dwarf the bacterial contribution to our microbiome by a factor of 10, only an estimated 1% of the
virome has been sequenced. These viruses play immunomodulatory roles and interact with microbes in complex regulatory
ways. (Cadwell, 2015)

Bacteriophages: Redefining the locus of immunity in the gut, these viruses adhere to mucus and selectively kill (lyse)
bacteria such as E coli. When they dont kill bacteria, they may confer valuable information, not only for humans, but for
the greater kingdom of living organisms: For example, aphids are protected against the injection of a parasitic wasp larva by
bacteria that produce a toxin that kills the implanted larvae. The toxin is supplied by a bacteriophage that infects the
bacterial endosymbiont. (Roossinck, 2011)

Brain lymphatics and immune function: It wasnt more than 10 years ago that we assumed the brain to be an immunity-
free zone.
Since our growing awareness of brain-based immunity, and even discovery of basic anatomical features such as
a lymphatic system, we can now understand how and why systemic inflammatory responses such as those generated by
vaccines, stimulate cascades of microglia-stimulated inflammation and cytotoxic damage. (Brogan, 2015)

Mucosal immunity: In an exploration of the individual variation in infection susceptibility, researchers from Aarhus
University published in Nature Immunology, the discovery of a mucosal mechanism instrumental in our coexistence with
potentially opportunistic bacteria and viruses. The mucosal surface, as the first line of defense for the body, is where all of
the most sophisticated mechanisms of host protection have evolved to exist. Of course, bypassing these mechanisms
through the intramuscular injection of inflammatory vaccine material serves an antiquated model of antibody-driven
immunity, not to mention the havoc it wreaks on an immune system which never evolved to respond to this route of entry.

Innate Immune Response to Viruses

Exploring herpes virus, researchers identified an arm of the immune system that acts in advance of the innate immune
system, and independent of the adaptive immune response. They state:

The pathway is activated independently of known innate sensors of viral infections through a mechanism
dependent on viral O-linked glycans, which induce CXCR3 chemokines and stimulate antiviral activity in a manner
dependent on neutrophils.

Wow. Back to the drawing board it is. We just dont have the information yet, to engage in the microbe war we believe is vital
to our very survival on this sick planet.

Cultivating the Microbiome Through Natural Pregnancy

Our knowledge of these sophisticated communication systems with the organismic world has also recentered the woman as
a vessel, pouring the natural world into her baby through pregnancy, natural birth, and breastfeeding, and that the reclaiming
of this experience is vital to the very survival of our species.

Antibiotics: A Misguided Approach to Human Health

Amazingly, great thinkers from decades ago anticipated the fallout of our misguided approach to human health. Alan Watts
wrote five decades ago, about antibiotics:
 Furthermore, every act of interference with the course of nature changes it in unpredictable ways. A human
organism which has absorbed antibiotics is not quite the same kind of organism that it was before, because the
behavior of its micro-organisms has been significantly altered.

The more one interferes, the more one must analyze an ever-growing volume of detailed information about the
results of interference on a world whose infinite details are inextricably interwoven. Already this information, even
in the most highly specialized sciences, is so vast that no individual has the time to read it let alone absorb it."

Reset and Remember

Its high time we pause for a recalibration. Its time to understand that our fearful frenzy fueling our defensive health
strategies is creating the realities we were most afraid of. The only way out of fear is to stop fighting it. Relax into it and
release it. Then you can see clearly how to proceed from a place of inner knowing and trust in the wisdom of
a body supported by millions of years of co-evolution with its environment.

Corporate Philanthropism: Who Exactly Benefits Most From The Global Giving By
Billionaires?
January 23 2016 | From: GlobalResearch

As the worlds political and economic elite gather to discuss their top concerns at the annual
Davos summit in the Swiss Alps and with attention this week focused on the scourge of economic
inequality, a new report begs questions about the potentially disastrous role the super-wealthy are
playing when it comes to addressing key problems of global inequity, endemic poverty, and
international development.
Released on Wednesday, the study by the UK-based social justice group Global Justice Now takes a specific look
at the impact of the worlds largest philanthropic charity, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), to assess
how large-scale private giving may be skewing how international aid works.

In its conclusion, the report argues that what may look like altruism on a grand scale may actually mask a sinister reality
about how the billionaires of the world insulate their personal fortunes while using their out-sized influence to project their
private ideologies and further financial interests. The result, the report suggests, is that many of the people and communities
who such charities purport to be helping, may actually be worse off in the long run.

With more than $43 billion in assets, the Gates Foundation is often lauded as a global force for social good that uses its vast
financial resources to launch initiatives and support existing projects in order to, according to its mission, help all people
lead healthy, productive lives.

The new report, however - entitled Gated Development: Is the Gates Foundation Always a Force for Good? - argues
that regardless of good intentions or motivations, the foundations concentration of power is undemocratically and
unaccountably skewing the direction of international development which in turn is exacerbating global inequality and
entrenching corporate power internationally.

As Mark Jones, lead researcher and author of the report, explains in the introduction:

"Analysis of the BMGFs programmes shows that the foundation, whose senior staff is overwhelmingly drawn from
corporate America, is promoting multinational corporate interests at the expense of social and economic justice.
Its strategy is deepening and is intended to deepen the role of multinational companies in global health and
agriculture especially, even though these corporations are responsible for much of the poverty and injustice that
already plagues the global south.

Indeed, much of the money the BMGF has to spend derives from investments in some of the worlds biggest and
most controversial companies; thus the BMGFs ongoing work significantly depends on the ongoing
 profitability of corporate America, something which is not easy to square with genuinely realising social
and economic justice in the global south."

Polly Jones, head of campaigns and policy at Global Justice Now, highlights why the foundations unique role as a private
organization is so troubling when it comes to putting a check on its enormous influence on the world stage.

The Gates Foundation has rapidly become the most influential actor in the world of global health and agricultural policies,
but theres no oversight or accountability in how that influence is managed, argues Polly Jones.

"This concentration of power and influence is even more problematic when you consider that the philanthropic
vision of the Gates Foundation seems to be largely based on the values of corporate America.

The foundation is relentlessly promoting big business-based initiatives such as industrial agriculture, private health
care and education. But these are all potentially exacerbating the problems of poverty and lack of access to basic
resources that the foundation is supposed to be alleviating.

Based on a careful review of the charitys behavior, the report offers these specific criticisms of the Gates
Foundation:

The relationship between the money that the foundation has to give away and Microsofts tax practices. A 2012 report
from the US Senate found that Microsofts use of offshore subsidiaries enabled it to avoid taxes of $4.5 billion a sum
greater than the BMGFs annual grant making ($3.6 billion in 2014).

The close relationship that BMGF has with many corporations whose role and policies contribute to ongoing poverty. Not
only is BMGF profiting from numerous investments in a series of controversial companies which contribute to economic and
social injustice, it is also actively supporting a series of those companies, including Monsanto, Dupont and Bayer through a
variety of pro-corporate initiatives around the world.

The foundations promotion of industrial agriculture across Africa, pushing for the adoption of GM, patented seed systems
and chemical fertilisers, all of which undermine existing sustainable, small-scale farming that is providing the vast majority of
food security across the continent.

The foundations promotion of projects around the world pushing private healthcare and education. Numerous agencies
have raised concerns that such projects exacerbate inequality and undermine the universal provision of such basic human
necessities.

BMGFs funding of a series of vaccine programmes that have reportedly lead to illnesses or even deaths with little official
or media scrutiny.

In Polly Jones forward to the report, she explains why the ideological underpinnings of the foundationoften overlooked or
ignored in mainstream assessments - are essential to understanding the downside of BMFGs powerful influence:

"[This report] demonstrates that the trend to involve business in addressing poverty and inequality is central to the
priorities and funding of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

We argue that this is far from a neutral charitable strategy but instead an ideological commitment to promote
neoliberal economic policies and corporate globalisation. Big business is directly benefitting, in particular in the
fields of agriculture and health, as a result of the foundations activities, despite evidence to show that business
solutions are not the most effective.

For the foundation in particular, there is an overt focus on technological solutions to poverty. While technology
should have a role in addressing poverty and inequality, long term solutions require social and economic justice.
This cannot be given by donors in the form of a climate resilient crop or cheaper smartphone, but must be about
systemic social, economic and political change issues not represented in the foundations funding priorities."
Earlier this week, Oxfam International released a report showing that economic inequality across the globe has soared to
such heights that now a mere 16 individual billionaires, including Bill Gates, own more wealth than the 3.6 billion people who
represent the poorest half of the worlds population. In total, the report confirmed, the richest 1% of people now own more
than the bottom 99% combined.

These shocking levels of unequal distribution of wealth are the cause, say experts, of increasingly intractable poverty levels
in places like sub-Saharan Africa and across the Global South.

The richest, said Oxfams executive director Winnie Byanyima, can no longer pretend their wealth benefits
everyone their extreme wealth in fact shows an ailing global economy. The recent explosion in the wealth of the
super-rich has come at the expense of the majority and particularly the poorest people.

Last week, as Common Dreams reported, international watchdog group The Global Policy Forum put out its own critical
report critical regarding the impacts of large philanthropic foundations and charities. Employing the term
philanthrocapitalism to described the phenonomen, the report argues that the influence of large foundations in shaping the
global development agenda, including health, food, nutrition, and agriculture raises a number of concerns in terms of how it
is affecting governments and the UN development system.
And the intersection between outrageous levels of inequality on the one hand and the rise of powerful private foundations on
the other shows how interlocked these phenomenons have become. As Gary Olson, professor of political science at
Moravian College in Pennsylvania, wrote recently at Common Dreams, The one thing that Big Philanthropy must overlook
is the green elephant astride the boardrooms conference table, the economic system that causes and extends [economic
and social] injustices in perpetuity.

Electromagnetic Fields From Mobile Phones Accelerate Mercury Release From Dental
Fillings
January 23 2016 | From: NaturalNews

A fascinating scientific study has found that using mobile phones can accelerate the release of
toxic mercury from dental fillings.
This is especially noteworthy given that many people hold their mobile phones right next to their jaws when talking
on them.

The study is one of millions linked on Science.NaturalNews.com, which hosts over 12 million published scientific studies
from around the world. You can also find the abstract at the National Library of Medicine.

A similar study which looked at MRI fields instead of mobile phone use is published at The International Journal of
Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after magnetic resonance imaging and following mobile phone use was
originally published in the Pakistan journal of biological sciences: PJBS, Publication Date: 2008; Study Author(s): Mortazavi,
S M J;Daiee, E;Yazdi, A;Khiabani, K;Kavousi, A;Vazirinejad, R;Behnejad, B;Ghasemi, M;Mood, M Balali; Institution:
Department of Medical Physics, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Also see Intra-oral air mercury released from dental amalgam for another study showing how mercury fillings release
mercury into the mouth.

The authors of the mobile phone study concluded that "MRI and microwave radiation emitted from mobile phones
significantly release mercury from dental amalgam restoration."

This means when you hold a mobile phone next to your jaw, you are driving electromagnetic energy into the mercury fillings
in your mouth, heating them up just enough to accelerate their release of mercury. You then inhale the mercury which enters
the bloodstream, poisoning your brain and kidneys.

Click here for my laboratory videos and look for my interview with Dr. Chris Shade who explains the shocking toxicity of
mercury in the human body.
Mercury makes People Insane

It is well known that metallic dental fillings respond to electromagnetic radiation. This is due to the laws of physics that
describe how metals are influenced by the kind of electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones.

The accelerated release of mercury from dental fillings may even help explain the increased insanity now being witnessed
across society. Mercury, which makes up about 50% of "silver" fillings used in dentistry, is a toxic heavy metal associated
with mental insanity. The term "mad as a hatter" originates from observations that hat makers who used mercury in the
processing of hat components often went insane.

The modern derivative term "quack" even comes from "quick" which is derived from "quicksilver," the common name for
mercury. Doctors used mercury for hundreds of years as a treatment for a wide assortment of medical conditions, claiming
patients were getting better even as they were being systematically poisoned (much the same still goes on today with
chemotherapy).

Mercury fillings are also linked to Alzheimer's disease. See Alzheimer's disease, dental amalgam and mercury.

A Binary Weapon that Threatens Humanity

In effect, mercury dental fillings and mobile phones have created a "binary weapon" of mass metals poisoning and cognitive
insanity. While mercury fillings (called "silver fillings" by the dishonest dentistry industry) have been toxic since the very first
day they were used, they are now far more toxic because of the ubiquitous use of mobile phones by nearly everyone.

You may have even noticed that the people of the modern world seem to have gone more insane as mobile phone use has
risen over the years. While this observation is anecdotal, it seems to be backed by legitimate science.

While there are many chemicals and heavy metals that might contribute to mental insanity in our modern world, few of those
chemicals are inhaled directly into the lungs the way mercury vapor is inhaled from dental fillings.
Even eating mercury or lead is not nearly as toxic (at the same concentrations) as inhaling those toxic elements. The lungs
deliver toxic vapors directly to the bloodstream, practically guaranteeing toxic elements will be deposited in tissues of the
brain, heart, kidneys or other internal organs.

The American Dental Association, which owns patents on mercury fillings, ridiculously insists that dental amalgams made of
mercury pose no risk whatsoever to human health. While this view was ignorantly accepted in, say, the 1950's, it is
hopelessly obsolete in 2016.

WARNING: Do not get Mercury Removed from your Mouth by a Conventional Dentist

If you're seeking to have mercury removed from your mouth, you must work with a holistic dentist who provides you with
supplemental oxygen during the removal procedure.

Drilling on mercury fillings releases toxic mercury vapor that you may inhale. You'll also likely swallow tiny mercury
particles during the procedure. The solution to the particles is to consume peanut butter, strawberries or chlorella both
before and after the procedure.

These are three foods that I have experimentally found to be the strongest binders with dietary mercury. See Health Ranger
research breakthrough: How to block nearly all the mercury in your diet using common, everyday foods.

Learn more about heavy metals in foods at Labs.NaturalNews.com

Research more about mercury toxicity at Science.NaturalNews.com

And stay informed about holistic dentistry at HolisticDentistry.news.

Click here for my full podcast on this topic.

How The Oil Industry Conquered Medicine, Finance And Agriculture

January 22 2016 | From: Mercola

"How Big Oil Conquered the World" is a brilliant piece of investigative journalism presented by
James Corbett, revealing the immense extent to which the oil industry has shaped and is ruling the
world as we know it.
"From farm to pharmaceutical, diesel truck to dinner plate, pipeline to plastic product, it is impossible to think of an
area of our modern-day lives that is not affected by the petrochemical industry."

"The story of oil is the story of the modern world. And this is the story of those who helped shape that world, and
how the oil-igarchy they created is on the verge of monopolizing life itself."

Corbett carefully details the sordid back story of today's "oiligarchy." While most people are well-acquainted with the
Rockefeller name, few probably know the true history of the Rockefellers' rise to power.

Big Oil - An Industry Founded on Treachery and Deceit

As noted by Corbett, certain details of the Big Oil story are well known. Others are more obscure. The story begins in rural
New York state in the early 19th century, with William Avery Rockefeller, an authentic "snake oil salesman" going by the
fictional name of "Dr. Bill Livingston.

While neither a doctor nor a cancer specialist, Rockefeller, aka "Dr. Livingston," aka "Devil Bill," traveled the country's back
roads conning people into buying his "Rock Oil" tonic for cancer - "a useless mixture of laxative and petroleum that had no
effect whatsoever," according to Corbett

William Avery Rockefeller fathered numerous children with three women, and took the name Livingston after being indicted
for rape in 1849. One of those children was John D. Rockefeller, who became the world's first billionaire after founding
Standard Oil.

As noted by Corbett:

When he wasn't running away from them or disappearing for years at a time, [William Avery Rockefeller] would
teach his children the tricks of his treacherous trade. He once bragged of his parenting technique: 'I cheat my boys
every chance I get. I want to make 'em sharp' ..

The world we live in today is the world created in 'Devil' Bill's image. It's a world founded on treachery, deceit, and
the navet of a public that has never wised up to the parlor tricks that the Rockefellers and their ilk have been
using to shape the world for the past century and a half."

The Birth of the Oil Industry

Another character with a similarly dubious background is "Colonel" Edwin Drake, an unemployed railroad conductor who
managed to secure himself a job with the Pennsylvania Rock Oil Company after running into the founders, George Bissell
and James Townsend, at a hotel.

The title "Colonel" was bestowed on him by Bissell and Townsend, who thought it might help him "win the respect of the
locals" as he went about the company's business, collecting Seneca oil, which the company distilled into kerosene (lamp
oil).

His mission was to collect enough Seneca oil to make the business profitable - a task that turned out to be more difficult
than expected, as mere gallons could be collected using the standard collection methods.
Eventually, he tried drilling through the shale bedrock to reach greater reservoirs of oil, and on August 28, 1859 - literally the
day he'd used up the last of his funds - the oil began to flow from the ground. And with that, a new industry was born.

It didn't take long before homes and factories around the world were using lamp oil refined from crude, and prospectors from
around the country flocked to Pennsylvania in search of the "black gold.

Among them was John D. Rockefeller, a Cleveland bookkeeper who, according to Corbett, had two ambitions in life: "To
make $100,000 and to live to 100 years old." With a $1,000 loan from his father, "Devil Bill," John D. Rockefeller set off to
make his fortune.

The Standard Oil Monopoly

After a series of partnerships and mergers over a seven-year period, John D. Rockefeller eventually incorporated Standard
Oil of Ohio in 1870. According to the report.

The next year, he quietly put what he called 'our plan' - his campaign to dominate the volatile oil industry - into
devastating effect. Rockefeller knew that the refiner with the lowest transportation cost could bring rivals to their
knees.
 He entered into a secret alliance with the railroads, called the South Improvement Company. In exchange for large,
regular shipments, Rockefeller and his allies secured transport rates far lower than those of their bewildered
competitors.

Ida Tarbell, the daughter of an oil man, later remembered how men like her father struggled to make sense of
events: 'An uneasy rumor began running up and down the Oil Regions,' she wrote.

'Freight rates were going up. Moreover all members of the South Improvement Company - a company
unheard of until now - were exempt. On every lip there was but one word and that was 'conspiracy.'

By the time he was 40, John D. Rockefeller controlled 90 percent of the global oil refineries. Within another few years (early
1880s), he also controlled 90 percent of the marketing of oil, and one-third of all oil wells. His power and influence cannot be
overstated at this point.

He had an international monopoly on what was to become the most important commodity in the world economy.

Following in Rockefeller's footsteps were a handful of other wealthy families, including the Nobels, the Rothschilds, the
Dutch Royal family, and millionaire William Knox D'arcy, who was the first to strike oil in Persia.

These early "oil barons" became enormously wealthy. And as billions of people became increasingly dependent on oil for
virtually every aspect of life, they gained tremendous power and influence.

However, oil could have been replaced by other resources, were it not for the shrewd manipulation by these early
"oiligarchs."

The Death of the Electric Car, and Other Lucky Breaks

.The advent of the electric light bulb took a good chunk out of the lamp oil market and temporarily threatened the oil
monopoly. But lamp oil was quickly replaced by the need for gasoline to run the two-stroke internal combustion engine,
invented by German engineer Karl Benz.

In 1888, Benz Motorwagen became the first commercially available automobile, and with that, the petroleum industry's
profits were again secured. But even then their ongoing monopoly was not guaranteed. The first electric car had been built
in 1884, and by 1897, electric cars were gaining popularity in London. In the early 20th century, 28 percent of cars sold in
the U.S. were also electric. As noted by Corbett:

The electrics had advantages over the internal combustion engine: they required no gear shifting or hand
cranking, and had none of the vibration, smell or noise associated with gasoline-powered cars. Lady Luck
intervened again on January 10, 1901, when prospectors struck oil at Spindletop in East Texas.

The gusher blew 100,000 barrels a day and set off the next great oil boom, providing cheap, plentiful oil to the
American market and driving down gas prices. It wasn't long before the expensive, low range electric engines were
abandoned altogether and big, loud, gas-guzzling engines came to dominate the road ..."

Interestingly, the event that made John D. Rockefeller into the world's first billionaire was supposed to rein in his unbridled
power. He'd come under intense scrutiny as his wealth increased and, on May 15, 1911, the U.S. Supreme Court declared
Standard Oil a monopoly "in restraint of trade" and ordered its dissolution.

But by dissolving the company into multiple entities, shares of Standard Oil tripled in value, and in a few short years,
Rockefeller's worth equaled nearly 2 percent of the total U.S. economy.

For the oiligarchy, the lesson of the rise and rise of Rockefeller was obvious: the more ruthlessly that monopoly
was pursued, the tighter that control was grasped, the greater the lust for power and money, the greater the reward
 would be in the end. From now on, no invention would derail the oil majors from their quest for total control. No
competition would be tolerated. No threat to the oiligarchs would be allowed to rise."

The Continued Squashing of Competition

While the electric car had been successfully eliminated, thereby securing Big Oil profits, another competing resource was on
the horizon: alcohol.

Henry Ford designed his Model T automobile to run on either gasoline or alcohol, stating that just about anything that could
be fermented could be used for fuel, predicting the future of fuel was wide open to a number of alternatives. However, the oil
industry succeeded in eliminating the competition yet again, this time by supporting the anti-alcohol movements and the
formation of the Prohibition Party in 1869.

While Rockefeller avoided alcohol, his chief concern was not to uphold morality in the U.S. The prohibition served his
agenda by creating burdensome restrictions on ethanol producers, and as ethanol became more costly, its attraction as an
alternate fuel ceased.

Also, as detailed in my previous article about Clair Patterson's fight to eliminate leaded gasoline, once the high compression
engine was invented, car manufacturers started running into performance problems. General Motors diagnosed the
problem, realizing that the problem originated with the fuel. General Motors tried about 15,000 different combinations of
elements to find a solution to the engine knocking.

Adding benzene from coal to gasoline was found to work. Ditto for adding grain alcohol. Adding 10 percent alcohol to
gasoline raised the quality of the fuel, causing less knocking in the engine. It also had other benefits, including clean
combustion, which eliminated soot emissions, and increased horsepower without engine knocking.

But as research continued, General Motors determined that adding lead to the gasoline produced "an ideal anti-knock fuel" -
ideal mostly because manufacturing the lead additive, tetraethyl lead, would allow them to make the greatest profits. Were
they to add alcohol to the gasoline, the oil industry stood to lose a large amount of petroleum sales, anywhere from 10 to 20
percent, depending on how much alcohol was added.

By adding lead, the oil industry had a product it could again control in its entirety. So Standard Oil partnered with General
Motors, creating a joint corporation known as Ethyl Corporation. Leaded gasoline became the norm, and over the next 80
years, countless people were sickened and harmed by this neurotoxic fuel additive, thrust upon the people for no other
reason than it created the greatest profits.

Big Oil Secretly Buys Up and Dismantles Public Transportation System

In 1936, Standard Oil and General Motors also took part in the reformation of public transportation. Only 10 percent of
Americans owned a car, and most city dwellers relied on electric trolley networks. By replacing the electric streetcars with
gasoline-guzzling buses, the oil industry secured an even greater foothold within the U.S. economy. As detailed in Corbett's
report:
 The cartel had been careful to hide their involvement in National City Lines, but it was revealed to the public in
1946 by ... Edwin J. Quinby ... He uncovered the oiligarchs' stock ownership of National City Lines and its
subsidiaries and detailed how they had step by step bought up and destroyed the public transportation lines in
Baltimore, Los Angeles, St. Louis and other major urban centres...

[I]n 1947 National City Lines was indicted for conspiring to form a transportation monopoly and conspiring to
monopolize sales of buses and supplies. In 1949, GM, Firestone, Standard Oil of California and their officers and
corporate associates were convicted on the second count of conspiracy.

The punishment for buying up and dismantling America's public transportation infrastructure? A $5,000 fine. H. C.
Grossman, who had been the director of Pacific City Lines when it oversaw the scrapping of LA's $100 million
Pacific Electric system, was fined exactly $1."

Next came the undermining of the railway system. In 1953, General Motor President Charles Wilson was appointed
Secretary of Defense, and Wilson, along with Francis DuPont, Chief Administrator of Federal Highways, set into motion the
largest public works project in U.S. history with the creation of the interstate highway system.

As a result, railway travel declined by 84 percent between 1945 and 1964, while private car ownership soared, and along
with it, gasoline sales, which rose 300 percent in that same time frame. Similar social engineering feats took place in
Europe, further securing the future of the oil business as a primary force to be reckoned with.

The report also goes into the details behind the gas shortages that sent the U.S. into a financial tailspin in the early 1970s,
revealing how the secretive Bilderberg Group, created by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands in 1954, successfully created
a new financial system based on the petrodollar - a system that granted the oiligarchs unprecedented control over the
economy.

The Rockefeller Transformation

In his day, John D. Rockefeller was a despised man. This all changed when he hired Ivy Ledbetter Lee, who essentially
invented the public relations industry as we now know it. John D. was filmed handing out dimes to the poor, and was
publicly portrayed as a kind and warm-hearted man. While hokey by today's standards, such simple stunts worked. Yet,
Rockefeller needed to go even further to truly gain the public's trust.

As Corbett notes:

In order to win the public over, he was going to have to give them what they wanted. And what they wanted wasn't
difficult to understand: money. But just as his father, Devil Bill, had taught him to do in all his business dealings,
Rockefeller made sure to get the better end of the bargain. He would 'donate' his great wealth to the creation of
public institutions, but those institutions would be used to bend society to his will.

As every would-be ruler throughout history has realized, society has to be transformed from the ground up.
Americans in the 19th century still prized education and intellectual pursuits ... with a remarkable 93 to 100 percent
literacy rate.

Before the first compulsory schooling laws in Massachusetts in 1852, education was private and decentralized,
and as a result ... a solid grounding in history and science was widespread. But a nation of individuals who could
think for themselves was an anathema to the monopolists. The oiligarchs needed a mass of obedient workers..."

The Takeover of Education

John D. Rockefeller's first great act of charity was the establishment of the University of Chicago, followed later by a $180
million donation to the establishment of the General Education Board.

But contrary to what you might think, these acts of generosity were not to further education, but to control and
impoverish it.

Frederick Taylor Gates became a trusted ally, and in "The Country School of Tomorrow," Gates lays out Rockefeller's plan
for the education of future Americans:

In our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding
hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own
good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into
philosophers or men of learning or science.

We are not to raise up from among them authors, orators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo
great artists, painters, musicians. Nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them
lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply."

The Effective Strategy That Eliminated Natural Medicine

Other oil-backed schemes to mold and reshape the American education system followed, including a scheme to alter the
teaching of American history to promote a view of collectivism, as well as a program culminating in the transformation of the
practice of medicine.
Naturopathic-based herbal medicine was the norm, and Rockefeller set out to shift the medical industry toward using oil-
derived pharmaceuticals. To this end, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research was established in 1901, headed up by
Simon Flexner.

His brother, Abraham, was an educator who was contracted by the Carnegie Foundation to write a report on the
state of the American medical education system. His study, 'The Flexner Report,' along with the hundreds of
millions of dollars that the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations were to shower on medical research in the
coming years, resulted in a sweeping overhaul of the American medical system.

Naturopathic and homeopathic medicine, medical care focused on unpatentable, uncontrollable natural remedies
and cures was now dismissed as quackery; only drug-based allopathic medicine requiring expensive medical
procedures and lengthy hospital stays was to be taken seriously ...

The fortunes of Carnegie, Morgan and Rockefeller financed surgery, radiation and synthetic drugs. They were to
become the economic foundations of the new medical economy ... The oiligarchy birthed entire medical industries
from their own research centers and then sold their own products from their own petrochemical companies as the
'cure.'"

The Takeover of America's Financial System and the Creation of a Food Monopoly

The financial power of these oil industry giants is by now near-unfathomable, but the aim was to control the entire financial
system. This was effectively accomplished with the creation of the Federal Reserve, established in 1913 following a secret
meeting on Jekyll Island, during which the details were ironed out. Attendants at this meeting included John D. Rockefeller
Jr.'s father-in-law, Senator Nelson Aldrich, and various banking representatives.
Related: The Creature from Jekyll Island

Later, in the 1950s, James Stillman Rockefeller, the grandson of John D.'s brother, became the head of National City Bank,
while David Rockefeller, John D.'s grandson, took over Chase Manhattan Bank. Still, they were not satisfied.

Springboarding from success to success as they consolidated monopolies across every field of human activity,
the oiligarchs' ambitions became even larger.

This time, their goal was to consolidate control over the very food supply of the world itself, and once again they
would use philanthropy as the cover for their business takeover,"Corbett explains.

The Rockefeller Foundation funded the Green Revolution that led to the introduction of petroleum-based agricultural
chemicals, which quickly transformed agriculture, both in the U.S. and abroad.
President Lyndon Johnson's "Food for Peace" program actually mandated the use of petroleum-dependent technologies
and chemicals by aid recipients, and countries that could not afford it were granted loans from the International Monetary
Fund and the World Bank.

The "Gene Revolution" was next, and as noted by Corbett:

The players involved in this 'Gene Revolution' are almost identical to the players in the Green Revolution, with I.G.
Farben offshoots Bayer CropScience and BASF Plant Science mingling with traditional oiligarch associate
companies like Dow AgroScience, DuPont Biotechnology and, of course, Monsanto, all funded by the Rockefeller
Foundation ..."
The Final End Game: Monopolising Life

In his usual style, Corbett manages to squeeze in an incredible amount of information in as compact a timeframe as is
humanly possible, and I highly recommend taking the time to watch the video in full. What I've included here is but a
summary overview of the many details he brings forth in this fascinating report.

Those who are ignorant of history are bound to repeat it, and if this story tells us anything, it is that unless we realize what
has been done, we'll be deceived again and again, because the oil oligarchy's end game is yet to be realized - if we let
them. As Corbett notes in closing:

The takeover of education, of medicine, of the monetary system, of the food supply itself, showed that the aim
was much greater than a mere oil monopoly: it was the quest to monopolize all aspects of life, to erect the perfect
system of control over every aspect of society, every sector from which any threat of competition to their power
could emerge ... But the oiligarchs are not done yet.

Their next project, launched in the late 20th century, is almost too ambitious to be comprehended ... It is about the
monopolization of life itself. They have spent decades preparing the path for this takeover and marshaled their
mind-boggling resources in service of the task. And the vast majority of the world's population, still playing the shell
game that the oiligarchs perfected and abandoned long ago, are about to fall right into their hands yet again."

4 Facts About ADHD That Teachers & Doctors Never Tell Parents
January 21 2016 | From: CollectiveEvolution

Putting a child in a classroom for 8 hours a day, for more than a decade, and expecting them to
listen while remaining obedient is very unrealistic.
From day one we are taught that this is the only path to success and we are shown the consequences of not paying
attention.

Related: Before His Death, Father Of ADHD Admitted It Was A Fictitious Disease

Its important to recognize that its perfectly normal for children to struggle with paying attention to something that they are
not even remotely interested in; this doesnt necessarily mean they have a disorder and it doesnt mean they require
(potentially quite harmful) prescription medications.

Its Okay If Your Child Struggles With Attention - This Doest Mean They Have A Disorder

Many doctors and teachers are already aware of this, but I would like to reiterate the point - just because your child
struggles with paying attention in school or sitting still in the classroom does not mean there is an underlying disorder to
blame. Its perfectly natural for your child to want to be active and to want to focus on things which actually interest them.

Sure, low grades might come as a result of not paying attention, but it is possible for a 2.0 student to know more than a 4.0
student; grades dont necessarily equate with intelligence. In many cases, they reflect an ability to follow rules and memorize
information - both important skills, but perhaps less important than critical thinking and creativity.

Some students may have a better ability to buckle down, pay attention, and do their work, while other, equally as intelligent
students, may struggle with this model. This, again, is perfectly normal, and could actually be a marker of something really
positive.
If your child is being held back and being denied even the possibility of entering a gifted program based on the fact that they
have attention issues, then there is problem.

New data from the National Center for Learning Disabilities shows that only 1 percent of students who receive services for
their apparent learning disabilities (some of which are completely and unquestionably valid) are enrolled in gifted or talented
programs. The report concluded that students with learning and attention issues are shut out of gifted and AP
programs, held back in grade level and suspended from school at higher rates than other students. (source)

Disorder Or Creativity?

The last point in the above paragraph is pretty disturbing, particularly given the fact that recent work in cognitive
neuroscience shows us that both those with an ADHD diagnosis, and creative thinkers, have difficulty in suppressing brain
activity that comes from the Imagination Network.

There are no school assessments to evaluate creativity and imagination; these are admittedly difficult to measure and,
accordingly, receive very little attention in the education system. Yet a lot of research is pointing to the fact that people who
show characteristics of ADHD are more likely to reach higher levels of creative thought and achievement compared to those
who dont show these characteristics.

By automatically treating ADHD characteristics as a disability as we so often do in an educational context we

are unnecessarily letting too many competent and creative kids fall through the cracks.

- Scott Barry Kaufman, Scientific Director of The Imagination Institute in the Positive Psychology Center at the
University of Pennsylvania (source)

While brain scans of people diagnosed with ADHD do show structural differences, it is a scary reality that a large portion of
ADHD diagnoses are derived from the observations teachers make in school. Too often, children are diagnosed based on
perceived behaviour alone, and then encouraged to take medication right away. These children are not actually tested or
scanned; they and their parents are simply told that they have ADHD.
 I think the big mistake in schools is trying to teach children anything, and by using fear as the basic motivation.
Fear of getting failing grades, fear of not staying with your class, etc. Interest can produce learning on a scale
compared to fear as a nuclear explosion to a firecracker.

- Stanley Kubrick

Did They Tell You This About The Pharmaceutical Industry?

Over the past two decades the pharmaceutical industry has moved very far from its original high purpose of
discovering and producing useful new drugs.

Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit, this industry uses its wealth and power to co-
opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the US Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers,
and the medical profession itself.

(Most of its marketing efforts are focused on influencing doctors, since they must write the prescriptions.)"

- Marcia Agnell, former editor of The New England Jopurnal of Medicine

The quote to your left comes from Harvard Medical professor and the former Editor-in-Chief of The New England Journal of
Medicine, Dr. Marcia Angell. She joins a long and growing list of some very credible people within the medical profession
who are trying to tell the world something important.

She has said on several occasions that it is no longer possible to believe much of the published research, or even to rely on
the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. (source)

Another great example is Dr. Richard Horton, who is currently the Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet, which is considered to be
one of the top ranked medical journals in the world. He said that:
 The case against science is straightforward, much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. .
. . Science has taken a turn towards darkness.

(source)

The reason why these professionals are saying such things is because, as Dr. Angell puts it, the pharmaceutical industry
likes to depict itself as a research-based industry, as the source of innovative drugs. Nothing could be further from the truth.
This is their incredible PR and their nerve.

The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of
medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing
themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think its disgraceful.

- Arnold Seymour Relman, Harvard Professor of Medicine

The percentage of children with an ADHD diagnosis continues to increase; it went from 7.8 percent in 2003 all the way up to
11.0 percent in 2011. According to a recent analysis, ADHD in children has surged by 43 percent since 2003. (source)

The quotes above arent just opinions, clearly these few (out of many) examples are from people who know a thing or two
about the industry, and it is troublesome to think that people still believe pharmaceutical corruption and manipulation of
scientific literature are conspiracy theories.

The most recent real world example of this comes from a few months ago, when an independent review found that the
commonly prescribed antidepressant drug Paxil is not safe for teenagers - all after the fact that a large amount of literature
had previously suggested this.

The 2001 drug trial that took place, funded by GlaxoSmithKline (also maker of the Gardasil Vaccine), found that these drugs
were completely safe, and used that science to market Paxil as safe for teenagers. The study came from John Ioannidis,
an epidemiologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.
Ioannidis is also the author of the most widely accessed article in the history of the Public Library of Science (PLoS), titled
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. In the report, he stated that most current published research findings
are false. And this was more than 10 years ago.

ADHD is classified as a mental disorder, which is interesting because the definition of these types of disorders in particular
have been shown to be heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry. American psychologist Lisa Cosgrove and others
investigated financial ties between the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) panel members and the
pharmaceutical industry.
They found that, of the 170 DSM panel members, 95 (56%) had one or more financial associations with companies in the
pharmaceutical industry. One hundred percent of the members of the panels on mood disorders and schizophrenia and
other psychotic disorders had financial ties to drug companies.

The connections are especially strong in those diagnostic areas where drugs are the first line of treatment for mental
disorders. In the next edition of the manual, its the same thing.

The DSM appears to be more a political document than a scientific one. Each diagnostic criteria in the DSM is not
based on medical science. No blood tests exist for the disorders in the DSMN. It relies on judgements
from practitioners who rely on the manual.

- Lisa Cosgrove, PhD, Professor of Counselling and School Psychology at the University of Massachusetts, Boston

The very vocabulary of psychiatry is now defined at all levels by the pharmaceutical industry.

- Dr. Irwin Savodnik, an Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at the University of California at Los Angeles
(source)

These are definitely some facts to take into consideration when it comes to dealing with your childs ADHD diagnosis. Its a
disease - one which I was also diagnosed with - that I personally dont even think is real.

I think it was made up strictly for the purpose of making money.

There Are Other Methods To Help Your Child Focus & Improve Your Childs Ability To Pay
Attention
Its becoming clear that we need a new approach to ADHD. Apart from examining the truth behind that label, as I hope I
have done in the above paragraphs, its important to note that there does not appear to be much room in our school system
for children who do not fit the normal mould of the majority.

The fact that we basically point a finger at them and label them does not really help anything. As much as weve been
marketed to believe that medication can help solve the problem, I really believe they only worsen it. Many of these
medications seem to dull the emotions and energy of the children taking them, ultimately making for a less positive and rich
life experience.

One great way to improve your childs ability to focus is to change their diet. Its a shame that hardly any research has been
published examining the relationship between mental disabilities and diet, since many medical professionals strongly
believe there is a direct link between them.

Some studies have, indeed, emerged which show a link between a gluten/casein free diet and improvement in autistic
symptoms, and some parents have already seen the benefits of implementing this research. (source)

The Mayo Clinic claims that certain food preservatives and colourings could increase hyperactive behaviour in some
children. It would be best to avoid these, regardless of whether they are linked to ADHD or not.

It has also been suggested that EEG biofeedback (electroencephalographic) could help. Its a type of neurotherapy that
measures brainwaves. You can read more about that here.
In 2003, a study published in the journal Adolescence looked at how regular massages for 20 minutes twice a week could
improve behaviour in the classroom. This is interesting because studies have also suggested that tai chi and yoga may also
help improve ADHD symptoms. According to the studies, children with ADHD that practiced tai chi became less anxious or
hyperactive. (source)

So, one thing you could try is observing what your child is eating. You can limit their intake of harmful, hormone disrupting,
disease causing foods like sugar, limit their exposure to pesticides, and encourage their consumption of fruits, vegetables,
and whole foods (rather than processed foods).

When it comes down to it, developing methods for your child to pay attention to something they find boring and/or useless is
a difficult task, and for parents who struggle with this, its important to remember that most likely your child is perfectly
normal. It will help to choose to look at it in a positive light.

The fact that children are forced into these institutions, told how the world works, made to follow certain rules, and pressured
to complete education out of fear of not having a job, is a truly unfortunate reality of todays world. It is not the best
environment for a child. Perhaps things will change in the future, but right now it seems children are encouraged to complete
education out of fear, out of necessity, and out of the mentality that this is just the way the world is.

When we cant say No, we become a sponge for the feelings of everyone around us and we eventually become
saturated by the needs of everyone else while our own hearts wilt and die. We begin to live our lives according to
the forceful should of others, rather than the whispered, passionate want of our own hearts.

We let everyone else tell us what story to live and we cease to be the author of our own lives. We lose our voice -
we lose the desire planted in our souls and the very unique way in which we might live out that desire in the world.
We get used by the world instead of being useful in the world.

- Dr. Kelly M. Flanagan, a licensed clinical psychologist, Ph.D. in clinical psychology (source)
Perhaps sitting down and talking to your child, letting them know that there is nothing wrong with them and that they dont
have a disorder is a good start, at least for those who have already been labeled. Again, just because one person struggles
with paying attention does not mean they have a disorder. If the information above is any indication, it could actually mean
the opposite.

Having your child even believe in that type of label could be harmful. Given the recent developments in neuroplasticity and
parapsychology, it has become clear that how a person thinks alone can change their biology.

Speaking with educators and finding a differentiated type of instruction more tailored to your childs needs and interests
could also be a solution. One of the biggest solutions, in my opinion, is not accepting labels for your children in the first
place.

This is a big problem in modern day education, and solutions are limited. The issue here really seems to be the environment
the children are surrounded by, not the children themselves.

Another thing parents could address are the feelings of the child. Part of growing up is learning to handle our emotions and
tackle whatever challenges life throws at us, but in school we are only taught content, and that is all we seem to focus on.
Humans are made up of more than just bits of learned information; we all perceive a certain way and if
emotions and thoughts are not openly discussed and dealt with, it can create problems in other areas.

I dont know about you, but in my adult life, I have never had to use geometry once yet I experience emotions
and challenges every day. If school is designed to prepare you for life why not teach actual life skills?

- Elina St. Onge

Russian Scientists Build And Study Pyramids:
What They Found Could Change The World
January 20 2016 | From: SitsShow

The following is a compilation of articles discussing the research on pyramids by Russian

Scientists and related works of other researchers there after.

Ever since I heard David Wilcock mention the Russian pyramid studies I was fascinated by this shape and how it
seemed to affect reality. It is probably one of the most well recognized elements of megalithic structures, yet how
these sites were constructed and what they were originally used for remains a mystery.

Dr. Volodymyr Krasnoholovets is a renowned scientist from the Institute of Physics in the Ukraine, that spent over a decade
building and researching many pyramids of varying heights and proportions. The Russian government even endorsed his
work, producing a 144ft tall pyramid outside of Moscow. What he discovered is truly remarkable and has implications that
could completely transform society as we know it.

Here is a brief summary of results from one of the articles below:

Immune system of organisms improved (blood leukocyte composition increased).

Improved regeneration of tissue

Seeds stored in the pyramid for 1-5 days showed a 30-100% increase in yield

Soon after construction of the Lake Seliger pyramid a marked improvement of the ozone was noted above the area

Seismic activity near the pyramid research areas are reduced in severity and size

Violent weather also appears to decrease in the vicinity of the pyramids

Pyramids constructed in Southern Russia (Bashkiria) appeared to have a positive effect on oil production with oil
becoming less viscous by 30% and the yield of the oil wells increased according to tests carried out by the Moscow
Academy of Oil and Gas.

A study was done on 5000 prisoners who ingested salt and pepper that had been exposed to the pyramid energy
field. The test subjects exhibited a greatly reduced violence rate and overall behavior was much improved.

Standard tissue culture tests showed an increase in survival of cellular tissue after infection by viruses and
bacteria

Radioactive substances show a decreased level of radiation inside the pyramid

There are reports of spontaneous charging of capacitors

Physicists observed significant changes in superconductivity temperature thresholds and in the properties of
semi-conducting and carbon nano materials.

Water inside the pyramid will remain liquid to minus 40 degrees Celsius but freeze instantly if jostled or bumped in
any way

With the use of pyramids we could heal the planet from centuries of environmental pollution, vitalize once extinct plant
species, heal the body and so on. These are just some of the things we've been able to verify, there are no doubt countless
other uses that will be discovered once more extensive research has been done.

Related Pyramid Power: Harnessing the Energetic Fields of Pyramids

Here is a video with David Wilcock (who has collated a remarkable body of work on the subject of pyramid energy in his
qorks) discussing the Russian pyramid research:

Tour of the Russian Pyramids

In January of 2001, a Dr. Volodymyr Krasnoholovets from the Institute of Physics in the Ukraine contacted me. (The Institute
of Physics was considered the top military research institute of the former Soviet Union.) This institute helped develop the
Russian cruise missiles, remote sensing devices, satellites, space station technology, and other military technology.

Dr. K (as we now call him) identified himself as a senior scientist at that Institute. He told me that in the last 10 years, he and
his colleagues were carrying out research in 17 large fiberglass pyramids, built in 8 different locations in Russia and Ukraine.
These pyramids varied in size, the largest being 144 feet high and weighing over 55 tons.

I had not been aware of these pyramids but it seemed that people from Russia knew about them. I was told that they are
popular tourist attractions and many people visit them.
Dr. K sent me photos of these pyramids along with a comprehensive research article about experiments conducted in them,
which he and his colleagues wrote. They asked me to post it on our web site and invited me to collaborate with them in their
pyramid research.

Dr. K explained that the Russians and Ukrainians conducted many kinds of experiments using these pyramids that included
such fields as medicine, ecology, agriculture, chemistry and physics. What is significant about this research is that it
scientifically documents the changes in both biological and non-biological materials that occur as a result of being placed in
these pyramids. So I posted their research article on our web site and subsequently appeared on several major radio
programs.

Then in February of 2001, the individual who actually financed and built the pyramids in Russia and the Ukraine contacted me
directly. He was Alexander Golod, a scientist and now Director of a State Defense Enterprise in Moscow. He found my web
site and saw that I was releasing the research carried out in his pyramids.

Alexander does not speak English so most of our communications were carried out through his son, Anatoli. He told me that
his father, Alexander, started constructing these pyramids in 1989. The Golods wanted to work with me also and to help
publicize and continue their research.
 In two months time, I was working with both the builders
and some of the major researchers of these pyramids.

Alexander had decided to build these pyramids because he

believed that they would produce an energy field that could
affect biological and non-biological objects.

He even got support from the Russian government for this

massive building project and convinced them in 1998 to
take a kilo of rocks that had been placed in one of his
pyramids on board the MIR space station.

He felt the energy fields they produced would help the

space station and possibly the entire world. Let us look at
these pyramids.
Alexander Golod in his office in Moscow

The largest and most recently built of the pyramids is located about 200 miles northwest of Moscow on Novorizhskoe
Highway. It is 144 feet high and was completed in 1999. It weighs about 55 tons and cost over 1 million dollars to build. It is
made of fiberglass.

The 144 Foot Tall Pyramid

Notice that the 144 foot tall pyramid has a sharper slope (greater acute angle) than the Great Pyramid of Giza. The Great
Pyramid has a slope of about 52 degrees and these pyramids rise at about a 73-degree angle.

The reason Alexander Golod chose this angle was based on

experimental designs that also included the mathematical
relationship called the Golden Section.

In his prototype experiments, it was determined that no

metal should be included in the structure of these pyramids,
so fiberglass was chosen since it would be strong enough to
also withstand the strong winds that occur in and near
Moscow.

When Alexander Golod was asked why he built these

pyramids, he replied:

I have children, I have a grandson, I do it for them.

These pyramids are an instrument to make the
world a better place to live and benefit mankind.

Everyone wants a photo in front of the pyramid.

People from all over Russia, including government officials,

cosmonauts, and even famous Russian actresses visit this
largest pyramid and spend time inside it.

Millions of people have visited this pyramid and on crowded days, you have to wait in line to enter it. Over the New Years
weekend, they counted 20,000 people in one day.

The next largest pyramid is the 72-foot pyramid, which is located 15 km from lake Seliger (Ostashkov area of Tver region,
Russia). It was completed in June of 1997. Itt is exactly one half the size of the largest pyramid (144 ft). As mentioned, the
design of these pyramids was based on the Golden Section, used by ancient architects to design many structures. This would
dictate that the pyramid sizes must be built in ratios.
The next (third) largest pyramid is 36 feet high abd it is located in Romenskoey, which is a suburb of Moscow. This is one of
the first pyramids built and where the first experiments began.

36 foot Pyramid

A design factor common to all the pyramids that Golod built is that they must be hollow inside. This design element was
determined in experiments using prototype models before the building of the large pyramids. Thus, two important conditions
of construction were that the pyramids must have no metal in them and they must be hollow.
Inside the 144 foot pyramid gazing upwards

In October of 1998, crystals that were placed in one of the Russian Pyramids were brought aboard the Russian MIR space
station and remained on board for over a year.

Crystals were also brought on the International Space Station for 10 days by cosmonaut Afanasiev. Alexander Golod believed
that these crystals would benefit both the space stations and the world.
The Russian MIR space station being visited by a US space shuttle

Future building plans include the construction of a 288-foot pyramid (twice the size of the 144 foot pyramid). They believe that
the larger the pyramid, the great the effect it produces.

Soon after the construction of this pyramid near Moscow,

botanists noticed extinct flowers starting to grow near it.

It is unknown why this has happened and has mystified

botanists.

One of the most interesting observations regarding these

pyramids comes from Russian Air Force Radar (or
Locator as they call it).

The first indication that the pyramids were producing

strange atmospheric effects was when the 144 foot or
largest pyramid was in the process of being built.

The planned pyramid would be composed of 30 main layers

or sections of fiberglass.

At the completion of the 11th section, Air Force radar picked

Alexander Golod with Cosmonaut Georgiy Grechko and G. Lozino- up an ion column coming right off the pyramid.
Lozinskiy during construction of the largest pyramid
This ion column was very large and in fact was over 1 mile
high.

As the pyramid construction continued, the ion column still

remained.

At the completion of the pyramid, a special weather balloon

was launched to measure this ion column.

The results will be discussed in the next chapter.

Construction phases of the 144-foot pyramid.

The image to the left shows the first 11 layers of the 30

completed of the 144-foot pyramid.

Pyramid Research

I read with great interest the report by Bovis describing his discovery of the mummifying power of the shape of the Great
Pyramid.

Having been experimenting and measuring bio-energy with the Neurophone and various other instruments described earlier, I
began a series of intensive experiments on the shape of the Great Pyramid to see if I could discover its great secrets.

I began by duplicating Bovis experiments with pyramids of various dimensions. Using Kirlian photography, GSR, voltage
differential, and electrostatic fields, I was able to measure the differences of various pyramids and their effects on living
organisms such as plants and people.

The very first experiments were in the area of preserving hamburger meat, liver, eggs, and milk. The first experiments were
very encouraging.
It was strange to realize I had taken small pieces of cardboard and made a simple shape that could concentrate some sort of
energy that would mummify food without any external power source. My controls all got so bad I had to throw them away.
Bovis and Drbal had indicated in their reports that the energy was focused in the Kings Chamber level bout one third up from
the base in the middle of the pyramid.

My own research indicates that the energy is present throughout the pyramid. I was able to mummify food anywhere in the
pyramid.

By careful measurement, I was able to determine that the maximum concentration of effect was in the Kings Chamber, but
there were effects in the other areas of the whole pyramid.

Further research with various materials of construction revealed further clues as to the nature of the phenomenon we were
investigating.

A series of energy measuring machines will be described. Some of these machines measure the effects of the energy on
other things, others are esoteric machines which are extremely sophisticated dowsing devices that rely on the human
computer as a readout detector.

I have tried various other geometric shapes other than the pyramid and have not had the results obtained with the exact
shape of the Pyramid of Gizeh.

Other geometric structures such as cones, icosahedrons, dodecahedrons, tetrahedrons, octahedrons, greater stellated
dodecahedrons, etc. all have shape characteristics, but these other shapes do not have any effects demonstrated by the
exact pyramid shape to be described.

Pyramid Research Projects

As a result of preliminary research, I began a series of serious research projects on the pyramid itself. The following is a list of
pyramids in tabular form:
The dimensions are based on the exact dimensions of the Pyramid of Gizeh. These are some of the dimensions of pyramids
used in my experimental work.

Based on the fact that the Pyramid of Gizeh is the only pyramid in the world that is ventilated, I have also experimented with
pyramids with windows in the sides. The windows are holes up to 1/3 of the base length in diameter. The holes do not detract
from the function and seem to actually aid the processes going on inside the structure.

The pyramids were made of various materials including cardboard, wood, plaster, Plexiglas, steel, copper, aluminum, cement
and combinations of the above materials.

The materials used did not affect the results very much, however the size and orientation was of primary importance. I at first
believed the pyramid to work best when it was aligned to true north, however, after very careful research, I discovered the
best alignment to be magnetic north, contrary to the alignment of the Great Pyramid.

This leads me to believe the Great Pyramid was built at a time when the earths field was aligned to the polar axis. It is not
unusual for the poles to shift.

At the time of the writing of this paper, the earths magnetic poles are shifting at a rate of 17 feet per month.

In the duplication of Bovis experiments, many perishable food items were tried in the pyramids of various shapes and sizes,
of different materials, and different orientations, and in different locations in the pyramid itself. The results of these
experiments indicate that the best alignment is according to the magnetic axis.

An experiment to determine the validity of this theory was performed by the use of an external permanent magnetic field. This
is illustrated in Figure XVI below.

Testing the effects of external magnetic fields on the pyramid

The pyramid was a six inch base cardboard one. The magnets are 5 inch alnico, the fields are on the order of 300 Gauss.
With the system described, I was able to get mummification of the foodstuffs with ANY alignment of the set, as long as the
pyramid itself was aligned to the magnetic fields as shown. The tables regarding the various food experiments are given in my
earlier paper, The Pyramid and Its Relationship to Biocosmic Energy.

My contribution to the field in food mummification is in the discovery that the pyramid will preserve food in any part of the
structure as well as in the Kings Chamber as reported by Bovis.

Razor Blades

In the duplication of Drbals razor blade sharpener, the following discoveries were made:

Whereas Drbal theorized the crystal structure of the blade reformed, I believe the pyramid prevents a dulling effect
due to contamination of the surface by skin oils and acids as well as the chemicals in shaving creams and soaps. I
shaved over 200 times with the blade treated in the pyramid.

I also shaved an equal number of times with another blade by rinsing my razor out in pure deionized distilled water
after every shave. My razors normally go bad in three or four shaves. There may also be a sharpening effect of a
sort by the action of energy discharge from the sharp edges of the blade.

It is well known that any sharp object charged with any energy, whether magnetic, electromagnetic, or electric tends to
concentrate and discharge from sharp surfaces and points when placed in a charged system.
From this point on, the experiments to be described are entirely the results of my own discoveries in the field.
Effects of Pyramid Energy on Living Organisms

The effects on the pyramid were tested on plants and human subjects. Measurement of changes in the organism were made
by means of Kirlian photography, GSR measurements of acupuncture points, Alpha wave detectors, and subjective
responses.

Kirlian Measurements

Kirlian photography ia a technique for recording photographic images of corona discharges and hence, the auras of living
creatures.The Kitlian photography images below are representative but not part of the actual studies described in this article.

Several hundred photographs were made of fingerprints and leaves before and after treatment with the pyramid.

Photographs were taken in both color and black and white. The color photographs are particularly striking as they show
changes in color as well as changes in brilliance and bioplasmic structure.

The aura or band of energy around the finger is rounder and larger than the aura in the first photo. The fact that the energy
content of the picture is larger and the shape is more rounded indicated an increase in aura without any loss of energy.

A more dramatic effect was obtained with a geranium leaf. The leaf had been off the plant for half an hour when the first photo
was taken.
The energy field was almost completely gone as the leaf was dying. The best results were obtained when the pyramids were
set up outside the building. The reason for this will be described in the next section on theory.

The Kirlian technique can be used to obtain an instant measure of the result of various energy techniques such as Yoga
breathing, meditation, and the effects of foods such as natural vs. chemically grown, alcohol vs. Ginseng, ozone vs. oxygen,
etc.

Subjective Reports

Several hundred people have sat in the 6 foot base plastic pyramids. The tests were first run on friends who were asked to sit
in the pyramid for half an hour and then asked to describe their feelings when they were in the structure. The subjects were
given no indication of what to expect. In all cases, the subjects reported intense heat in the body and a tingling sensation in
the hands.

A number of people decided they wanted pyramids of their own. My own body energy has increased since I began sleeping in
the pyramid tent. An effect reported by many is a sense of time distortion.

One subject sat in the pyramid for 4 hours and had the subjective impression that 1/2 hour had passed. It had been stated
by alpha researchers that a person in the alpha state loses all sense of time and space. This correlates with observed alpha
activity in the pyramid.

Meditation

Many of the subjects were interested in psychic phenomena and practice various forms of meditation. ALL subjects who
practice meditation have reported a significant increase in the effects of meditation in the pyramid.
This correlates with the theory that the Great Pyramid was built as a meditation chamber to develop psychic powers [although
it seems now that there are multiple uses for pyramids].

Animals

No extensive tests have been conducted on animals at this time. There are however, three cases of interest.

A friend of mine placed his pet cat in a pyramid once a day for 1/2 hour. The cat liked the pyramid and began to sleep in it.
When the test was begun, the cat had been a voracious meat eater.

After 6 weeks, the cat stopped eating meat and starved rather than eat meat. Subsequent tests indicated that the cat had
changed his diet and would only eat fruit and vegetables, cheese and nuts. The animal became a vegetarian! He ate raw
vegetables and fruits of all descriptions; canteloupe, avocado, oranges, and watermelon. The same thing happened to
another cat as well as my own poodle.

Growth of Plants

A series of tests were run on the effects of pyramid treatments on the growth rate of plants. The test plants were alfalfa
sprouts. I had some familiarity with sprouts as I had grown over 2500 pounds of them in the confines of my office!

The sprouts were treated three different ways:

1. treatment of feed water;

2. direct treatment of the plant in the pyramid;

 3. treatment of the seed in the pyramid.

In all cases, identical tests were made in an identical volume cubic box as a control structure.

In all cases, the pyramid treated plants grew 2 to 3 times as fast as the controls, were more healthy and lasted longer after
harvest.

One California grape farmer used my system on his irrigation system and his grape yield was 2-1/2 times the average yield of
his neighbors and the California average.

Water Treatment

The water may be treated in several ways.

It may be placed in the pyramid in a container for a period of time depending on the size of the pyramid and the
amount of water treated. I used a 2 foot base pyramid and treated a quart bottle for 1/2 hour.

Another technique is to run water into a spiral coil placed in the pyramid and fashioned into a form of fountain.

Direct Treatment of Sprouts

The pyramid used was a one foot base unit made of clear plexiglass. Four inch holes were cut in the sides for full
ventilation. The sprouts were grown entirely in the pyramid.

The controls were grown entirely in a well ventilated equal volume cube.

Treatment of Seeds

The seeds were placed in pyramid for 8 hours.

Results
 The water and plant treatments were best, the seed treatment was last. The pyramid grown sprouts lasted over a
week without spoilage after harvesting.

The controls on the other hand lasted 24 to 36 hours before spoilage.

Dehydration

Because of the dehydration or mummification of foods in the pyramid, I tried a number of experiments to see if the
dehydration rate is accelerated in the pyramid. It is not.

Normal dehydration occurs, the difference being that items placed in the pyramid do not decay while dehydrating.
Sprouts grown in the pyramid and left without water 24 hours do not die and decay as the controls do. The controls
developed odor and died.

The sprouts in the pyramid dehydrated slightly but did not decay and resumed normal growth when watering was
resumed.

Short Term Effects On Foods, Change of Taste

During my original tests on mummification of foods, I used to taste the foods being treated to make sure they were really
good. Although there was no sign of decay, I wanted to see how the food tasted as it was undergoing the process of
mummification.

I was in for a great surprise! Not only did the foods taste good, they tasted better than they did before they were placed in the
structure!

I began experimenting in earnest, and discovered that the pyramid could have an effect on the taste of food even when the
food was treated for a surprisingly short duration. I was so impressed by this new discovery that I began a series of double
blind tests on the change of taste in foods.

I used several dozen people, and the test was conducted as follows: The foods were all taken from the same source, that is
the foods tested were the same food divided in half so the control would be the same as the treated sample except for the
treatment.
The samples were then placed in paper cups with numbers on the bottoms. The cups were then divided and recorded in a
master file. The ones chosen for the pyramid were then treated for five minutes in the pyramid. The pyramid used for the tests
was the 6 inch base ventilated.

The cups of food were then all mixed at random so no one knew which food was which. Taste tests were conducted and 40
out of 48 people chose the foods treated in the pyramid as being more to their liking.

I like hundred percent results, so I interviewed the ones who missed on some of the foods and learned they were either heavy
smokers or drinkers. Subsequent interviews with a licensed wine taster confirmed my suspicions that people with certain
eating and drinking habits cannot distinguish taste very well.

The foods tested were of all types; sweet, sour, various alcohols, fruits, and tobaccos:

Bitter and sour foods lose their bite, they become milder.

Sweet foods become sweeter.

Coffee loses its bitterness and tastes as if it were acid free.

Fruits increase in their qualities.

Acid tasting pineapple loses its acid taste and becomes as sweet as fresh ripe pineapple picked right out of the
field.

Tobacco loses its harshness: Mexican black tobacco loses its harshness and tastes like mild choice Virginia. The most
dramatic effects occurred on pipe tobacco, unfiltered cigarettes, and cigars.

One of my associates smokes a very harsh unfiltered brand and uses a crystal type filter cigarette holder. When his cigarettes
were treated in the pyramid, he noticed he did not have to change his filter crystal so often. Instead of changing it between
every pack, he now has to change it after every three or four packs.
People who had whole cartons of their brands treated with the pyramid came back wanting their new cigarettes treated
because they could not stand the harsh taste of their normal brand after smoking pyramid treated cigarettes.

Bananas and other perishables keep longer if they are treated in the pyramid for half an hour after they are purchased.
Controls all turned bad in a short time, and the fruits treated in the pyramids kept fresh up to twice as long as the controls.

Cut flowers take longer to die if they are placed in pyramid treated water. Speaking of water, tests were run on the taste of
regular city water treated in the pyramid. The water used to water the plants.

All people who made the tests noticed the pyramid water tasted fresher and had less of a chemical or chlorine taste than the
water which was untreated.

To recap; Dr. Alexander Golod, PhD. has been doing Russian pyramid research in the former Soviet Union since 1990. This
research involved the construction of over twenty large pyramids in 8 different locations in Russia and the Ukraine.

The pyramids were built in many places including Moscow, Astrakhan, Sochi, Zoporozhye, Voronezh, Belgorod, the Tver
Region, Krasnodar, Tolyatti, Uzbekistan, and France.
All the Russian pyramids are made of fiberglass with the largest standing an incredible 144 feet high (44 meters) tall, and
weighing in at over 55 tons. Built at cost over 1 million dollars this Russian pyramid is a modern wonder.

Many different experiments are being done using these pyramids. They include studies in medicine, ecology, agriculture,
physics, and health sciences. What is significant about this work is that it is being carried out by top scientists in Russia and
Ukraine and not fringe elements or unknown inventors.

Some of the amazing pyramid power research being done is showing great promise for all mankind.

A Brief Summary of Pyramid Research Results:

Immune system of organisms improved (blood leukocyte composition increased).

Improved regeneration of tissue

Seeds stored in the pyramid for 1-5 days showed a 30-100% increase in yield

Soon after construction of the Lake Seliger pyramid a marked improvement of the ozone was noted above the area

Seismic activity near the pyramid research areas are reduced in severity and size

Violent weather also appears to decrease in the vicinity of the pyramids

Pyramids constructed in Southern Russia (Bashkiria) appeared to have a positive effect on oil production with oil
becoming less viscous by 30% and the yield of the oil wells increased according to tests carried out by the Moscow
Academy of Oil and Gas.

A study was done on 5000 prisoners who ingested salt and pepper that had been exposed to the pyramid energy
field. The test subjects exhibited a greatly reduced violence rate and overall behavior was much improved.
 Standard tissue culture tests showed an increase in survival of cellular tissue after infection by viruses and
bacteria

Radioactive substances show a decreased level of radiation inside the pyramid

There are reports of spontaneous charging of capacitors

Physicists observed significant changes in superconductivity temperature thresholds and in the properties of
semi-conducting and carbon nano materials.

Water inside the pyramid will remain liquid to minus 40 degrees Celsius but freeze instantly if jostled or bumped in
any way

It is interesting to note that results seem to show that increasing the height of the pyramid improves the quality of the results.

So, as you can see from this brief introduction, there is

much we have to learn about the natural forces around us.

The Egyptians [et al] knew some of this when they designed
the great pyramids at Giza.

However, with modern scientific research techniques it is

now becoming possible to gain even more insight and
benefit from Russian Pyramid Power!

I will, along with others, be conducting personal

experiments using scaled down models of these amazing
pyramids.

Small Russian pyramid complex

Related: The Russian Pyramids Revealed: A Builders Manual eBook is Now Available

Putin: Human Evolution Under Threat By Big Pharma, GMO, Vaccines

January 17 2016 | From: YourNewsWire

A report prepared by the Security Council (SCRF) circulating in the Kremlin today states that
President Putin has issued orders that his people must be protected from GMO food and
Western pharmaceuticals at all costs.
The Western government-controlled people are an "intensively vaccinated borderline autistic fat man slumped in
front of a screen battling a high-fructose corn syrup comedown", claims Putin who says that Russians "must be
protected ... at all costs".

Related: Putins New Plan To Become #1 Scares Monsanto Big Time

The report says that President Putin believes the next stage of human evolution is currently in grave risk and that Western
and global powers are intentionally decelerating the process for their personal gain.

We as a species have the choice to continue to develop our bodies and brains in a healthy upward trajectory, or
we can follow the Western example of recent decades and intentionally poison our population with genetically
altered food, pharmaceuticals, vaccinations, and fast food that should be classified as a dangerous, addictive
drug.

We must fight this. A physically and intellectually disabled population is not in our interests, the report states.

Describing the average government-controlled Westerner as an;

Intensively vaccinated borderline autistic fat man slumped in front of a screen battling a high-fructose corn syrup
comedown, the report states that such tactics used by governments to subjugate their citizens are not only
dark/evil but counter-productive in the medium to long term.

Russia under President Putin has been giving away land for free in the past few years to people willing to farm organically
and sustainably. The goal is to become the worlds leading exporter of non-GMO foods that are based on ecologically
clean production.

The Security Council report comes just months after the Kremlin announced a stop to the production of all GMO-containing
foods, which was seen by the international community as a major step in the fight against multinationals like
Monsanto. Russia continues to lead the way in the realm of natural, organic farming.

9 Lies About Fat That Destroyed The World's Health

January 16 2016 | From: Sott

The areas of nutrition and disease prevention are full of incompetence.

We have been wrongly advised to avoid saturated fat and cholesterol, despite no evidence of harm.

Here are the top 9 biggest lies, myths and misconceptions about dietary fat and cholesterol.

1. A Low-Fat, High-Carb Diet is The Optimal Human Diet

Back in 60s and 70s, many prominent scientists believed that saturated fat was the main cause of heart disease, by raising
the "bad" cholesterol in the blood.

This idea was the cornerstone of the low-fat diet. Because of a few bad studies and misguided political decisions, this diet
was recommended to all Americans in the year 1977 (1).

However, there wasn't a single study on this diet at the time. The American public became participants in the largest
uncontrolled experiment in history.

This experiment didn't turn out very well and we are still suffering the consequences. This graph shows how the
obesity epidemic started at almost the exact same time the low-fat guidelines came out:
The diabetes epidemic followed soon after. Of course, a graph like this doesn't prove anything. Correlation does not equal
causation.

But it seems plausible that the low-fat recommendations made things worse because people started eating less
of healthy foods like meat, butter and eggs, while eating more processed foods high in sugar and refined
carbohydrates.

Even though there was little evidence at the time, the low-fat diet has actually been thoroughly studied in the past few years
and decades.

It was put to the test in the biggest controlled trial in nutrition history, the Women's Health Initiative. In this study, 48,835
postmenopausal women were split into two groups. One group ate a low-fat diet (with the whole grains and all that) while the
other group continued to eat "normally."

After a period of 7.5-8 years, the low-fat group weighed only 0.4 kg (1 lb) less than the control group and there was no
difference in the rate of heart disease or cancer between groups (3, 4, 5, 6). Other huge studies also found no advantages
for the low-fat diet (7, 8, 9).

But it doesn't end there, unfortunately... the low-fat diet recommended by most nutrition organizations is not only ineffective,
it may even be downright harmful.

In multiple human studies, the low-fat diet has actually made some important risk factors worse, raising triglycerides,
lowering HDL (the good) cholesterol and making the LDL particles smaller (10, 11, 12, 13). Despite miserable results in the
studies, many nutritionists all over the world continue to recommend the low-fat diet that is hurting more people than it
helps.

Bottom Line: There is no evidence that low-fat diets have any benefits. They do not cause weight loss in the long-term or
reduce the risk of chronic diseases. Some studies show that they may even cause harm.

2. Cholesterol Rich Foods (Like Eggs) Are Bad For You

Nutrition professionals have had remarkable success with demonizing perfectly healthy foods. Probably the worst
example of that is eggs, which are among the healthiest foods on the planet. Just think about it... the nutrients in an
egg are enough to turn a single fertilized cell into an entire baby chicken.

Even so... because eggs contain large amounts of cholesterol, they were believed to cause heart disease. However, studies
actually show that the cholesterol in the diet does NOT raise the bad cholesterol in the blood. Eggs raise HDL (the good)
cholesterol and are not associated with an increased risk of heart disease (14, 15,16, 17, 18).

What we're left with is an incredibly healthy food... loaded with vitamins, minerals and powerful nutrients that are important
for the eyes and brain (19, 20,21).

Keep in mind that almost all the nutrients are found in the yolk... the white is nothing but protein. Telling people to ditch the
yolks may be just be the most ridiculous nutrition advice in history.

Bottom Line: Eggs were demonized because of the high amount of cholesterol, but new studies show that they don't raise
cholesterol in the blood or contribute to heart disease. Eggs are among the most nutritious foods on the planet.
3. Your Total and LDL Cholesterol Levels Are Good Indicators of Heart Attack Risk

Probably the biggest mistake in modern medicine is focusing too much on Total and LDL cholesterol levels as indicators of
heart attack risk. Well... it is true that elevated levels of both are associated with increased risk (22).

But the whole picture is much more complicated than that. Total cholesterol actually includes lots of things... including HDL,
also known as the "good" cholesterol.

Having high HDL actually raises your Total cholesterol number. LDL cholesterol isn't just LDL either... there are subtypes.
We have the small, dense LDL particles (very bad) and then we have the large, fluffy LDL (good). The small particles are
associated with heart disease, while the large ones are mostly benign (23, 24, 25, 26, 27).

Studies actually show that Total and LDL cholesterol are poor indicators of risk compared to other markers, like the
Triglyceride:HDL ratio (28, 29). One study found that out of 231,986 patients hospitalized for heart disease, half of them
actually had normal LDL levels (30)!

There are also studies showing that high cholesterol can be protective. In old individuals, the higher the cholesterol, the
lower your risk of heart disease (31,32).

Not to mention that cholesterol levels that are too low are actually associated with increased risk of death... from other
causes, like cancer and suicide (33, 34).

Despite the weak predictive value of Total and LDL cholesterol, people with elevated numbers are often instructed to lower
cholesterol by any means necessary... including a low-fat diet (which doesn't work) and statin drugs.

Right now, millions of people all around the world are taking cholesterol lowering drugs without needing them,
unnecessarily suffering the risk of serious side effects.

Bottom Line: Total and LDL cholesterol levels are actually quite poor markers of heart disease risk. Many people are being
unnecessarily medicated because doctors tend to focus on these numbers.

4. Processed Seed- and Vegetable Oils Are Healthy

For some very strange reason, processed seed and vegetable oils became recognized as health foods. Humans only
started consuming them about a 100 years ago, because we didn't have the technology to process them until then.

Yet, somehow the nutrition geniuses figured that these would somehow be very healthy for humans and certainly better than
the "dangerous" saturated fats.
These oils, which include soybean, corn and cottonseed oils, are very high in polyunsaturated Omega-6 fatty acids, which
are harmful in excess and can contribute to inflammation (35, 36, 37).

Despite these oils being recommended to reduce heart disease, there are actually multiple studies showing that they
increase the risk (38, 39, 40, 41). In a study that looked at common cooking oils on the U.S. market, they found that
0.56% to 4.2% of the fatty acids in them were highly toxic trans fats (42)!

However... these oils are actually recommended by the beloved organizations that are supposed to be in charge of
protecting our health. This is one example of where blindly following the conventional nutritional wisdom can put you in an
early grave.

Bottom Line: Processed seed- and vegetable oils are very unhealthy, loaded with Omega-6 fatty acids and trans fats that
can contribute to disease.

5. Saturated Fat Raises Your Bad Cholesterol and Causes Heart Disease

The "war on saturated fat" has been a miserable failure.

It was initially based on flawed studies, but somehow became public policy (with disastrous consequences). The worst part
is... the governments and health organizations have yet to change their position despite overwhelming evidencethat
they've been wrong all along.

Actually, saturated fat doesn't really raise LDL that much. The effect is weak and inconsistent and appears to depend on the
individual (43, 44, 45).
When saturated fat does affect LDL, it changes the particles from small, dense (very, very bad) to Large LDL, which is
mostly benign (46, 47, 48). Saturated fat also raises HDL cholesterol, which is associated with a reduced risk of heart
disease (49, 50).

If anything, saturated fats actually improve the lipid profile, NOT the other way around. In the past few years, many massive
studies have examined the link between saturated fat and heart disease risk.

One of these studies included 347,747 participants and looked at data from 21 studies. The conclusion: there is no
evidence that saturated fat increases the risk of heart disease (51).

Many other studies confirm these findings. Saturated fat is harmless (52, 53). The truth is... saturated fat never has been
and never will be proven to cause heart disease, because it simply isn't true.

Bottom Line: Despite decades of anti-fat propaganda, saturated fat has never been proven to cause heart disease. In fact,
saturated fat improves some of the most important risk factors for heart disease.

6. Saturated Fats and Trans Fats Are Similar

Trans fats are unsaturated fats that have been chemically modified to be more solid and have a longer shelf life. They are
also known as partially hydrogenated fats.

The manufacturing process is very disgusting... involving high pressure, high heat, a metal catalyst and hydrogen gas. The
fact that anyone thought these nasty fats would be suitable for human consumption is baffling.

Some of the major health organizations have started to confuse people by grouping trans fats together with saturated fats,
calling them the "bad fats" (54).
However... like I outlined above, saturated fat is completely harmless, but the same can NOT be said for trans fats. Trans
fats are highly toxic and can cause insulin resistance, inflammation and significantly raise the risk of serious diseases like
heart disease (55, 56, 57, 58).

Even though consumption has gone down, trans fats are still found in processed foods and the FDA still categorizes them
as "Generally Regarded as Safe" (GRAS).

If you want to avoid chronic disease... then eat your butter, meat and coconut oil, but avoid trans fats as if your life
depended on it (it does).

Bottom Line: Trans fats resemble saturated fat in consistency and shelf life, but the chemical composition is still very
different. While saturated fats are harmless, trans fats are highly toxic and should be avoided.

7. Eating Fat Makes You Fat and High-Fat Diets Are Dangerous

Fat is the stuff that lodges under our skin and makes us look soft and puffy. Therefore, eating more fat should make us store
more of it. You are what you eat, right? Well, it actually isn't that simple.

Even though fat has more calories per gram compared to protein and carbs, foods that are naturally high in fat are very
fulfilling and hard to overeat. In fact, studies on diets that are high in fat (and low in carbs) show that these diets
cause more weight loss than diets that are low in fat (59, 60, 61).
Low-carb, high-fat diets also lead to all sorts of other benefits... increased HDL cholesterol, lower triglycerides, lower blood
sugar and insulin levels, more abdominal fat loss and improved size of LDL particles (62, 63, 63, 65).

Despite this, many nutrition professionals still have the audacity to call low-carb diets harmful, then continue to
peddle the failed low-fat diet that has been proven, time and time again, to be completely ineffective.

Bottom Line: Despite fat having more calories per gram than carbs or protein, studies show that high-fat (and low-carb)
diets actually lead to more weight loss than low-fat diets.

8. Processed Margarine is Better Than Natural Butter

Because of the war on saturated fat, butter became recognized as an unhealthy food. Food manufacturers jumped on the
bandwagon and started producing butter replicates like margarine.

Most margarines contain large amounts of processed vegetable oils, often with trans fats added to the mix. It is hard to
imagine how people could think that processed, factory made margarine would be healthier than butter, which is completely
natural and humans have been eating for a long time.
The studies also do NOT support the idea that margarine is healthier than butter. In the Framingham Heart Study, margarine
was associated with an increased heart disease risk compared to butter (66):

Many other studies have looked at high-fat dairy products and found no evidence that they contribute to any disease... in
fact, high fat dairy is associated with a lower risk of obesity (67, 68).

Despite all the fear mongering, high fat dairy products like butter are extremely healthy, especially if they are
derived from grass-fed cows.

Bottom Line: Margarine is an unhealthy fake food produced in factories, usually containing trans fats and processed
vegetable oils. Butter is a much healthier choice, especially if it comes from grass-fed cows.

9. Processed Low-Fat Foods Are Healthy Options

Because of the ridiculous low-fat advice, food manufacturers removed the fat from some of their foods. But there was a
major problem... natural foods taste terrible without the fat.

The food manufacturers realized this and added a whole bunch of sugar to compensate for the missing fat. For this
reason, most "low fat" foods are actually loaded with sugar, which is seriously harmful (69, 70, 71).
If a food has "low fat"or "diet" on the label, then you will probably find sugar, corn syrup and various artificial chemicals on
the ingredients list.

However, sales of these foods have skyrocketed because many nutrition professionals still advise people to eat them... even
though the "normal fat" alternatives are much healthier!

Comment: When we allow industry lobbyists to intimidate politicians by threatening to withhold campaign funds unless they
do as they're told, and when we allow so-called "scientists" to do alleged "scientific studies" designed to fit the facts around
predetermined outcomes, the result is that people are fed what amounts to poisonous substances mistakenly referred to as
"food," and people are lied to about what is and isn't truly healthy.

And, in the process of people being slowly sickened and killed by such evil behavior big agriculture and big pharma rake in
billions making their leaders rich - at the expense of everyone's health. This entire scenario is probably one of the biggest
human atrocities ever perpetrated in all of the recorded history of man.

Medical Deaths And The Corruption Of Healthcare

January 15 2016 | From: Sott

In the USA alone it has been estimated that at least 210,000 patients died from medical mistakes in
a year making this the third leading cause of death while heart disease is the first and cancer
comes second.
Can the above figure be used to expose the corruption in medicine?

The reason why it has taken so long to realise that something is not right and why so many still don't see that anything is
going on can be explained like this:

On the whole, people: healthcare workers or patients or the public at large, can regard many circumstances in medicine as
isolated cause and effect relationships. In other words, people generally fail to make the connections between the
different cause and effect relationships.

The Connections Linking Medical Deaths and Corruption

It is necessary to make the connections so that we can step back and see the 'big picture' of what's really going on and why
certain things occur: If not, then indeed, this can be likened to the analogy of looking at separated pieces of jigsaw puzzle
and not having the realisation that they are somehow all connected and therefore not carrying out the task of joining up the
pieces to see how it works overall.

Such has happened in the circumstances surrounding deaths from medical mistakes. This is why the corruption still
continues and how the villains are allowed to get away with it. The big picture and the corruption comprise the
connections between: The World Health Organisation, approval bodies such as the FDA, pharmaceutical
companies, equipment manufacturers, academia, research institutions, media, the legal profession, healthcare staff
and patients. All these can be tied in with 'favours for favours...'
Comment: The healthcare system has become a travesty because corporate profiteers have captured the entire profession:

Big Pharma, Bad Medicine: How Corporate Dollars Corrupt Research and Education

Big Pharma: How they manipulate American medical doctors

Conflicts of interest and corruption are rife within the CDC

Surprise! More FDA corruption: Constitutional attorney speaks out

Medical insider: "science has taken a turn towards darkness"

'DocuSerial' - A new journalistic genre exposing Big Pharma corruption

Nothing stays the same. If everyone was concerned enough to get a deep enough level of realisation of what's really going
on in medicine by connecting up the circumstances or pieces of information to find that they are interrelated (the big picture),
then consequently, there would be a mass transformation of the healthcare system. This would eventually be brought about
by the reactions that would follow from realising the corruption.

This mass transformation is my vision: To see a major turnaround of the healthcare system, where treatment will be based
on a genuine want to cure people. Where people are put before profits, instead of the reverse; the way it is at the
moment.
It is also the visions of other activists and dissident Doctors, growing in numbers by the day. I would say that one of the
biggest reasons why more and more people are realising that they are caught up in a scandal in medicine is through the
availability of the internet and its access to information that would otherwise be very difficult to get.

I also find that, in some of my discussions with people, I can see that their intuition has been already telling them that
something is not right in the world of medicine...

I predict that, in time, whether it will take a few years or many decades I don't really know, but we will have a revolution on
our hands. The healthcare system will change. I have no doubt that it will be a radical change.

Western world medicine should be truly outstanding considering the money spent, but it is not, as exemplified in the above
must see video featuring an impassioned talk by Doctor Joe Mercola with jaw-dropping facts and figures:

Are Deaths from Medical Mistakes THE Biggest Cause of Death and Suffering?

Every time deaths from medical mistakes (or deaths from medicine) are re-estimated, taking other factors into consideration
the figure increases. Will we ever get a true figure?
Over the last few decades, the more technology that has been introduced into orthodox medicine be it, drugs, state-
of-the-art equipment, apparatus, technical expertise...the more unnecessary procedures there are. I'm not for one
minute saying that all technology is bad, but a lot of it can do a great deal of harm.

Comment:

Killer Care: How medical error became America's third largest cause of death

WHO: Millions Of People Die Each Year Due To Medical Errors

Inaccurate diagnostic tests lead to misdiagnosis & death

This Time Its Serious: Monsanto Is Sued For Crimes Against Humanity
January 15 2016 | From: TheDawn

Several dozens of non-commercial organizations and human rights activists have sued biotech
transnational Monsanto for crimes against humanity and ecocide, and they will have to stand trial
in the international court in The Hague, in October next year.
The announcement of the trial was carried out in a press conference in the context of the COP21 Climate Summit
being held in Paris, as was informed by the environmental and health advocate OCA (Organic Consumers
Association).

Related: Monsantos Chemicals Make Their Way Into 85% of Personal Hygiene Cotton Products

According to the plaintiffs, Monsanto has been developing, since the early twentieth century, toxic products that are
causing irreparable damage to both the environment and human health.

Among the substances is Roundup, a highly toxic herbicide which is the most used in the world; Polychlorinated biphenyls -
persistent organic pollutants that affect human and animal fertility - , Lasso - a herbicide that is now banned in Europe -, and
2,4,5-T - a component of Agent Orange that was used by the US military during the Vietnam War that causes cancer and
congenital malformations.

The trial is scheduled to be held between October 12 and 16 2016, after The Hagues court has studied the facts alleged
against Monsanto.
The trial will be based on the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, adopted by the UN in 2011. The plaintiffs
are the OCA, International Foundation for Organic Agriculture (IFOAM), Navdanya and Regeneration International (RI) and
Millions Against Monsanto, among other groups.

OFFICIAL STATEMENT

Global Food, Farming and Environmental Justice Groups to Put Monsanto on Trial for Crimes Against Human
Health and the Environment in the International Peoples Court in The Hague

Organic Consumers Association, IFOAM, Navdanya, Regeneration International and others form Monsanto Tribunal
Foundation in advance of World Food Day 2016

PARIS The Organic Consumers Association (OCA), IFOAM International Organics, Navdanya, Regeneration International
(RI), and Millions Against Monsanto, joined by dozens of global food, farming and environmental justice groups announced
today that they will put Monsanto MON (NYSE), a US-based transnational corporation, on trial for crimes against nature and
humanity, and ecocide, in The Hague, Netherlands, next year on World Food Day, October 16, 2016.

The announcement was made at a press conference held in conjunction with the COP21 United Nations Conference on
Climate Change, November 30 December 11, in Paris.
Speaking at the press conference, Ronnie Cummins, international director of the OCA (US) and Via Organica (Mexico), and
member of the RI Steering Committee, said: The time is long overdue for a global citizens tribunal to put Monsanto on trial
for crimes against humanity and the environment.

We are in Paris this month to address the most serious threat that humans have ever faced in our 100-200,000 year
evolution - global warming and climate disruption.

Why is there so much carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere and not enough carbon organic matter
in the soil?

Related: Top Scientist Resigns From His Post At The University Of California Admitting Global Warming Is A Big
Scam

Corporate agribusiness, industrial forestry, the garbage and sewage industry and agricultural biotechnology have literally
killed the climate-stabilizing, carbon-sink capacity of the Earths living soil.

Vandana Shiva, physicist, author, activist and founder of Navdanya, and member of the RI Steering Committee said:

Monsanto has pushed GMOs in order to collect royalties from poor farmers, trapping them in unpayable debt, and
pushing them to suicide.

Monsanto promotes an agro-industrial model that contributes at least 50 percent of global anthropogenic
greenhouse gas emissions. Monsanto is also largely responsible for the depletion of soil and water resources,
species extinction and declining biodiversity, and the displacement of millions of small farmers worldwide.
Andre Leu, president of IFOAM and a member of the RI Steering Committee, said: Monsanto is able to ignore the human
and environmental damage caused by its products, and maintain its devastating activities through a strategy of systemic
concealment: by lobbying regulatory agencies and governments, by resorting to lying and corruption, by financing fraudulent
scientific studies, by pressuring independent scientists, and by manipulating the press and media.

Monsantos history reads like a text-book case of impunity, benefiting transnational corporations and their executives, whose
activities contribute to climate and biosphere crises and threaten the safety of the planet.

Marie-Monique Robin, journalist and author of the best-selling documentary (and book by the same name), The World
According Monsanto, said:

This International Citizens Tribunal is necessary because the defense of the safety of the planet and the
conditions of life on Earth is everyones concern. Only through a collective resurgence of all living forces will we
stop the engine of destruction. Thats why today I am calling on all citizens of the world to participate in this
exemplary tribunal.

Also speaking at the conference were Valerie Cabanes, lawyer and spokesperson for End Ecocide on Earth; Hans Rudolf
Herren, president and CEO of the Millennium Institute, president and founder of Biovision, and member of the RI Steering
Committee; Arnaud Apoteker, creator of the anti-GMO campaign in France, which became one of the priority campaigns of
Greenpeace France, and author of Fish in Our Strawberries: Our Manipulated Food; and Olivier De Schutter, co-chair of
the International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems (IPESFood) and former UN Special Rapporteur on the
Right to Food.

Since the beginning of the twentieth century, Monsanto has developed a steady stream of highly toxic products which have
permanently damaged the environment and caused illness or death for thousands of people. These products include:

PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyl), one of the 12 Persistent Organic Pollutants (POP) that affect human and animal fertility;

2,4,5 T (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid), a dioxin-containing component of the defoliant, Agent Orange, which was used
by the US Army during the Vietnam War and continues to cause birth defects and cancer;
 Lasso, an herbicide that is now banned in Europe;

And RoundUp, the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the source of the greatest health and environmental
scandal in modern history. This toxic herbicide, designated a probable human carcinogen by the World Health Organization,
is used in combination with genetically modified (GM) RoundUp Ready seeds in large-scale monocultures, primarily to
produce soybeans, maize and rapeseed for animal feed and biofuels.

Relying on the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights adopted by the UN in 2011, an international court of
lawyers and judges will assess the potential criminal liability of Monsanto for damages inflicted on human health and the
environment.

The court will also rely on the Rome Statute that created the International Criminal Court in The Hague in 2002, and it will
consider whether to reform international criminal law to include crimes against the environment, or ecocide, as a
prosecutable criminal offense.

The International Criminal Court, established in 2002 in The Hague, has determined that prosecuting ecocide as a criminal
offense is the only way to guarantee the rights of humans to a healthy environment and the right of nature to be protected.

Full list of founding organizations (so far) here.

Full list of Monsanto Tribunal Foundation organizing members here.

More information will be available at monsanto-tribunal.org, after 2:30 p.m. EU time on December 3, 2015.

The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) is an online and grassroots non-profit 501(c)3 public interest organization
campaigning for health, justice, and sustainability. The Organic Consumers Fund is a 501(c)4 allied organization of the
Organic Consumers Association, focused on grassroots lobbying and legislative action.

Regeneration International is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to building a global network of farmers, scientists, businesses,
activists, educators, journalists, governments and consumers who will promote and put into practice regenerative agriculture
and land-use practices that: provide abundant, nutritious food; revive local economies; rebuild soil fertility and biodiversity;
and restore climate stability by returning carbon to the soil, through the natural process of photosynthesis.

'Cancer Screening Has Never Saved Lives' - BMJ Study Concludes

January 14 2016 | From: GreenMedInfo

Millions have marched for "cancer causes." Millions more have been diagnosed "early" and now
believe screening saved their lives.

But a new study confirms something we have been reporting on since our inception: In most cases, screening not
only has not "saved lives," but actually increases your risk of dying.

Related: American Cancer Society admits conventional cancer treatment causes more cancer

An extremely important new study published in the British Medical Journal titled, "Why cancer screening has never been
shown to "save lives" - and what we can do about it," confirms something we have been reporting upon at
GreenMedInfo.com since our inception, namely, cancer screening has not lived up to its long held promise of "saving lives"
because disease-specific reductions in mortality do not equate to reductions in overall mortality. Worse, in some cases
overall mortality actually increased because of screening.

In the new study, Vinay Prasad and colleagues, argue that the real benchmark for the success of any cancer screening
program is if the "early stage" cancers being diagnosed and treated actually result in a reduction in the overall mortality.
For instance, we have reported extensively on the widespread misclassification of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as
a bono fide malignant cancer, as well as its epidemic level overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Tens of fhousands of
women are diagnosed each year with these so-called "early stage breast cancers," even though the National Cancer
Institute itself acknowledges it should be classified as a benign or indolent lesions of epithelial origin.

The New England Journal of Medicine published a study in 2012 shows that approximately 1.3 million women were
diagnosed with DCIS in the past 30 years, with most receiving either mastectomy, lumpectomy, radiation, chemotherapy, or
some combination thereof.

Ironically, many of these women ardently believe that their lives were "saved" by the screening and treatment,
succumbing to the biomedical equivalent of Stockholm syndrome where identifying with the 'aggressor' becomes
palliative.

In reality, most suffered irreparable harm not from the "cancer," but from both the psychological and physical effects of
being wrongly diagnosed and treated. If the end point were not breast cancer specific mortality ('invasive' breast cancer
has not declined but increased with screening, indicating overdiagnosis), but overall mortality, it is likely that these
DCIS diagnosed women's lives were significantly truncated because of screening programs; at the very least, the quality of
their lives would have been significantly negatively impacted.
Related: Majority of cancer drugs that FDA has recently approved dont work

An extremely important new study published in the British Medical Journal titled, "Why cancer screening has never been
shown to "save lives"and what we can do about it," confirms something we have been reporting upon at
GreenMedInfo.com since our inception, namely, cancer screening has not lived up to its long held promise of "saving lives"
because disease-specific reductions in mortality do not equate to reductions in overall mortality. Worse, in some cases
overall mortality actually increased because of screening.

In the new study, Vinay Prasad and colleagues, argue that the real benchmark for the success of any cancer screening
program is if the "early stage" cancers being diagnosed and treated actually result in a reduction in the overall mortality.

For instance, we have reported extensively on the widespread misclassification of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as
a bono fide malignant cancer, as well as its epidemic level overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Tens of fhousands of
women are diagnosed each year with these so-called "early stage breast cancers," even though the National Cancer
Institute itself acknowledges it should be classified as a benign or indolent lesions of epithelial origin.
The New England Journal of Medicine published a study in 2012 shows that approximately 1.3 million women were
diagnosed with DCIS in the past 30 years, with most receiving either mastectomy, lumpectomy, radiation, chemotherapy, or
some combination thereof. Ironically, many of these women ardently believe that their lives were "saved" by the screening
and treatment, succumbing to the biomedical equivalent of Stockholm syndrome where identifying with the 'aggressor'
becomes palliative.

In reality, most suffered irreparable harm not from the "cancer," but from both the psychological and physical effects of
being wrongly diagnosed and treated. If the end point were not breast cancer specific mortality ('invasive' breast cancer
has not declined but increased with screening, indicating overdiagnosis), but overall mortality, it is likely that these
DCIS diagnosed women's lives were significantly truncated because of screening programs; at the very least, the quality of
their lives would have been significantly negatively impacted.

Despite growing appreciation of the harms of cancer screening,1 2 3 advocates still claim that it "saves lives.

"This assertion rests, however, on reductions in disease specific mortality rather than overall mortality.

Using disease specific mortality as a proxy for overall mortality deprives people of information about their chief
concern: reducing their risk of dying.5 6 Although some people may have personal reasons for wanting to avoid a
specific diagnosis, the burden falls on providers to provide clear information about both disease specific and
overall mortality and to ensure that the overall goal of healthcare - to improve quantity and quality of life - is not
undermined.7

In this article we argue that overall mortality should be the benchmark against which screening is judged and
discuss how to improve the evidence upon which screening rests."

And so, without the proper benchmark or end point, all the educational and fund-raising efforts going towards "reducing
deaths" or "saving lives" from breast, prostate, lung, skin, brain, [insert body part], become misleading, if not overtly
propagandist in nature.
Indeed, the extant scientific evidence itself reveals that at best the present disease specific agenda for "cancer prevention"
is pseudo-scientific. In the section of the study subtitled, "Why cancer screening might not reduce overall mortality," the
authors summarize what the literature reveals on the topic:

Discrepancies between disease specific and overall mortality were found in direction or magnitude in seven of 12
randomised trials of cancer screening.8 Despite reductions in disease specific mortality in the majority of studies,
overall mortality was unchanged or increased.

In cases where both mortality rates were reduced the improvement was larger in overall mortality than in disease
specific mortality. This suggests an imbalance in non-disease specific deaths, which warrants examination and
explanation.

A systematic review of meta-analyses of cancer screening trials found that three of 10 (33%) showed reductions in
disease specific mortality and that none showed reductions in overall mortality. "

The implications of this are profound.

As we reported previously with Anjelina Jolie's decision to have her breasts and ovaries prophylactically removed,
ostensibly to "reduce her risk of dying," removing healthy body parts to prevent disease-specific mortality is unlikely to
reduce the overall risk of dying.
Related: Millions Fall Prey To This Deadly Breast Cancer Myth

And yet, the "Jolie effect" is a well established phenomena. Her decision was lauded the world over as courageous and an
"evidence-based" precautionary step, with tens of thousands of women (and some men) following suit. We hope the
new BMJ study raises a flag of true caution for those who may habitually and uncritically follow the celebrity-centric herd
mentality.

The significant harms of screening overdiagnosis and overtreatment extend to men as well. For instance, aggressive
prostate screening programs over the past few decades have resulted in the removal and/or irradiation of millions of men's
prostates. A 2004 study found that an astounding 200,000 men are being diagnosed annually with prostate cancer.
Tragically, the 2013 National Cancer Institute report referenced above also found that so-called "early stage prostate
cancer," high grade intraepithelial prostatic neoplasia (HGPIN), is also essentially a benign lesion within prostatic epithelial
tissue, not unlike DCIS in women's breasts. In other words, millions of men were diagnosed with a potentially lethal "pre-
cancer" or "early stage cancer" they never had.

As an aside, it should be noted that even in the case of lesions of true concern for malignancy, there is always hope. Cancer
is not an inexorably lethal, genetic mutation-driven process that happens in an environmental, nutritional, and psycho-
spiritual/emotional vacuum.

Related: The Top Seven Natural Cures For Cancer That Got Buried By The FDA, AMA, CDC

Instead of viewing it as the biological equivalent of a terrorist, and cutting, burning, and poisoning the target tissue (and,
collaterally, the entire body of the host), we need to abandon the warfare model of allopathic medicine and adopt one that
focuses on targeting cancer stem cells in non-toxic ways, looking at carcinogenesis through the lens of the informational
dysregulation of genetic and epigenetic pathways in the cell; informational "disease" in contradistinction to physiochemically-
based disease is, of course, more prone to being reversed.
Cancer, in this view, can be halted in its tracks, and even regressed, assuming that, along with informational corrections
(e.g. "nanopharmacological" approaches like homeopathy, "energy healing," high quality food (which is also information-
containing)), the tumor microenvironment can be adjusted back to healthier conditions through detoxification, lifestyle
modifications, mind-body interventions, and targeted, "high dose" nutritional support.

The new study explained how prostate screening programs have created "off target" deaths, primarily through the high rate
of false positives, overdiagnosis of non-harmful cancers (e.g. HGPIN), and detection of incidental findings (i.e.
unintentionally discovered conditions):

For example, prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing yields numerous false positive results, which contribute to
over one million prostate biopsies a year. Prostate biopsies are associated with serious harms, including admission
to hospital and death.

Moreover, men diagnosed with prostate cancer are more likely to have a heart attack or commit suicide in the year
after diagnosis or to die of complications of treatment for cancers that may never have caused symptoms."

Shockingly, PSA-based prostate screening has been found to have a false positive rate of about 75%.2 Obviously, given
this finding, there is nothing specific at all about the prostate "specific" antigen test, which is why the United States
Preventive Services Task Force now strongly recommends against it.

How the Public Is Misled Into Believing "Screening Saves Lives"

As we have explored in previous writings, such as "The Dark Side of Breast Cancer Awareness Month" and "A DIRE
WARNING: The Cancer Industry Owns The Media And Your Mind," the public is intentionally misled into believing a
priori cancer screening saves lives even when no real, independent scientific evidence exists to support it.
The new study reveals just how truly inflated the public's expectations have become:

A systematic review has shown that the public has an inflated sense of the benefits and discounted sense of the
harms of mammography screening, the cervical smear test, and PSA screening.

In one study 68% of women thought that mammography would lower their risk of getting breast cancer, 62%
thought that screening at least halved the rate of breast cancer, and 75% thought that 10 years of screening would
prevent 10 breast cancer deaths per 1000 women.

Even the most optimistic estimates of screening do not approach these numbers. The most recent Cochrane
review of randomised controlled trials of PSA screening failed to show a reduction in disease specific death. The
Cochrane review of mammography did not show reduced breast cancer deaths when adequately randomised trials
were analysed.

Advocates of screening have emphasised its benefits, sometimes verging on fear mongering. Others, including us,
think that shared decision making should be the focus. But as long as we are unsure of the mortality benefits of
screening we cannot provide people with the information they need to make an informed choice. We must be
honest about this uncertainty.

A summary of the Swiss medical board's decision not to recommend mammography shows that for every 1000
women who undergo screening one breast cancer death is averted (from five to four), while non-breast cancer
deaths either remain at 39 or may increase to 40.

If non-breast cancer deaths remain the same, a woman must weigh net benefit against harms. If screening
increases non-breast cancer deaths to 40, women would simply be trading one type of death for another, at the
cost of serious morbidity, anxiety, and expense.
 Women should be told that to date, with over 600000 women studied, there is no clear evidence of a reduction in
overall mortality with mammography screening."

The public's uncritical trust in screening programs help keep hidden the significant harm they produce; harms that are further
obfuscated by industry-sponsored research.

The study cites the fact that, "of 57 studies [reviewed] only 7% quantified overdiagnosis and just 4% reported the rate of
false positive results." They also found that, "When researchers do examine the harms of screening the results are typically
sobering":

False positive results on breast cancer screening have been associated with psychosocial distress as great as a
breast cancer diagnosis 6 months after the event.

False positive results affect over 60% of women undergoing screening mammography for a decade or more, and
12-13% of all men who have undergone three or four screening rounds with PSA.

In the NLST [National Lung Screening Trial] 39.1% of people had at least one positive test result, of which 96.4%
were false positives.

Overdiagnosis affected 18% of people diagnosed with lung cancer on low dose CT in the NLST, and researchers
have found that as many as one in three diagnoses of invasive breast cancer (or one in two for invasive cancer
and carcinoma in situ) by mammography constitute overdiagnosis.

These numbers are broadly equivalent to those found with most major screening tests."

There are also well-known, though rarely acknowledged, harms associated with the screening technologies themselves. For
instance, x-ray mammography uses a particular type of gamma radiation that has been found to have as much as a six
fold increased carcinogenicity.
Related: Covering Up The Causes of Breast Cancer Since 1985: AstraZeneca's BCAM

Another example is CT scans. It has been estimated that .4% of all cancers in the U.S. are caused by them. Clearly
cancer screening programs that rely on intrinsically carcinogenic diagnostic technologies (as well as carcinogenic
treatments like chemotherapy and radiotherapy) must be halted if they can not actually be proven to "save lives," which,
I believe, the study clearly demonstrates.

The study concludes, powerfully:

We encourage healthcare providers to be frank about the limitations of screeningthe harms of screening are
certain, but the benefits in overall mortality are not. Declining screening may be a reasonable and prudent choice
for many people. Providers should also encourage participation in open studies.

We call for higher standards of evidence, not to satisfy an esoteric standard, but to enable rational, shared decision
making between doctors and patients. As Otis Brawley, chief scientific and medical officer of the American Cancer
Society, often states: "We must be honest about what we know, what we don't know, and what we simply believe."

For additional learning listen to the lead author Vinay Prasad's interview from the British Medical Journal's website below:

FDA Has Known Processed Meat Causes Cancer Since The 1970s, But Continues To
Cover Up Truth To Protect Meat industry
January 11 2016 | From: NaturalNews
They're added to nearly every processed meat product sold in the today nitrites and other
synthetic curing chemicals that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says are safe to use for
keeping meat products from spoiling too quickly.

But an investigation by researchers from the University of Wisconsin has uncovered that, despite years of
denial, the FDA has known since at least the 1970s that nitrites cause cancer, and yet continues to pander to the
meat industry in allowing their use.

Related: Marketing Milk and Disease: Why You Should Avoid Most Dairy Products

Meat curing has been around forever, with the historical record showing that this process allowed ancient cultures to
preserve meats for extended periods of time, especially during periods of food scarcity. People didn't have refrigerators back
then, remember, so they had to come up with novel ways of food preservation that would get them through harsh weather
conditions and other volatile environmental factors.

The fact that people have been curing meats since time immemorial isn't necessarily a problem. Salt, after all, is a natural
curing agent that, in and of itself, isn't harmful. It's when salt is transformed through synthetic chemical alterations in this
case, as nitrites that it becomes harmful. And these same nitrites, according to independent scientists, have been the
subject of intense debate over the years concerning their safety.

Sodium Nitrite Linked to Leukemia, Cancer

Sodium nitrite, one of the most popular curing chemicals found in processed meat products today, contains certain nitroso
compounds that, under the right conditions, can transform into cancer-causing nitrosamines. Even at the time when sodium
nitrite was first offered up for commercial approval in the 1970s, it was recognized that nitrosamines come with serious
health risks, including the threat of leukemia and other forms of cancer.

The debate over whether or not to approve sodium nitrite in the 1970s was centered around the chemical's known
carcinogenicity, and the fact that other, safer curing compounds were already readily available. Nitrite opponents did what
they could to present sound science that highlighted all this, which they believed would win the FDA over in rejecting sodium
nitrite in favor of safer alternatives.
But the FDA ultimately capitulated to the meat lobby, which saw dollar signs rather than people's health as being the priority.
Synthetic nitrites, after all, are cheap to produce, they preserve the inherent color and flavor of meats, and most people don't
even know they're there unless, of course, they develop a serious health condition as a result of consuming them.

Naturally-Occurring Nitrites aren't Harmful

Not to be confused with naturally-occurring nitrites, which aid in the body's normal regulation of blood pressure, immune
response and more, synthetic nitrites have an almost opposite effect on the body, damaging the normal function of
hemoglobin and possibly even causing brain damage, particularly in young people.

"Nitrite changes the normal function of hemoglobin, which carries oxygen in the blood to the rest of the body, into a
form called methemoglobin that cannot carry oxygen," explains the New Hampshire Department of Environmental
Sciences.

"In severe, untreated cases, brain damage and eventually death can result from suffocation due to lack of oxygen.

Dietary nitrites, on the other hand, offer many protective benefits, including their ability to spur production of nitric
oxide in the body. Nitric oxide helps regulate blood pressure, boost immunity, aid in wound repair, and improve
neurological function, among other benefits.

The normal production of nitric oxide and nitrite may prevent various types of cardiovascular disease including
hypertension, atherosclerosis, and stroke," explains the University of Wisconsin report.

This is why purchasing only nitrite-free meats, or meats that contain only naturally-occurring nitrites from vegetables like
celery, is critical for your long-term health. Reading food labels and making smart purchasing decisions will go a long way in
protecting you and your family against cancer and other forms of chronic illness.

Kuia Worried Smart Meter Is Affecting Her Health

January 10 2016 | From: MaoriTelevision
In the Northland region there are growing concern over the introduction of smart meters by power
companies into homes.

The smart meters measure power usage with some consumers experiencing a hefty rise in their power bills as well
as certain illnesses believed to be caused by these machines.

Related: Top Biochemist Calls To Abolish Smart Meters, WiFi In Schools, And Baby Monitors

Her kettle is switched on, but Marama Waddell says she's been experiencing bad health since the installation of this new
smart meter at her residence.

It's been affecting my body and mind and I've been very sick. I can't even sleep. Every day and every night, it's
not good and it's not just me as I've spoken to other families experiencing similar problems to me" says resident,
Ms Waddell.

Due to the increased concern, her smart meter is being tested for the rate of radio frequency radiation emitting from it.

Close friend to Ms Waddell, Clare Swinney says I think people should be aware that they do not have to accept a smart
meter they're not compulsory. The NZ safety standards unfortunately don't protect people from the effects of these
microwave radiation omitting devices.

Te Kea are yet to receive a reply from power companies we contacted today about the concerns over the smart meter.
Even though its the middle of summer customers are also feeling the bite of a sharp rise in their power bills.

Former smart meter user Nellie Rata says I'm no longer using my electric blanket because winter has long passed and yet
I've received a hefty power bill. And I don't want it cut off because I want to live with dignity and not have to worry about
that.

It's a warning to do your research before agreeing to have smart meter installed at home.
The Remedy For True Health & The True Origin Of Vaccines
December 27 2015 | From: Sott

As America [and not JUST America... sigh] struggles with a 'legal' drug addiction like no other
nation, are we missing something fundamental about how the body realizes true health?
1802 painting of smallpox vaccine inventor Dr. Edward Jenner vaccinating a room full of people who then sprout cows from their bodies. The painting
illustrates popular 17th century fears about vaccination. The caption reads The Cow Pock or the Wonderful Effects of the New Inoculation.

If we look at ancient teachings - those which have been around since well before the fairly new invention of
'modern,' allopathic medicine, which has only been in existence really since the 19th century, and the dawn of
'germ theory, ' instead of relying on the advice of an industry which has grown swollen with greed, might we not
discover simple, profound measures to heal the body, once and for all?

Related: Clive de Carle: How You Can Restore Your Health, Enabling Your Body To Self-Repair From Virtually

Since the rise of western medicine, influenced by the ancient teachings of Greece, but somehow divorced from the more
insightful teachings of that time, we have tried to sanitize the world to pieces.

We remove limbs and organs with multiple surgeries, blast cells with radiation and chemotherapy, and treat our natural
immune system like a four letter word. We give more vaccines than ever, yet somehow various 'germs' and 'super bugs'
have taken over. We now have the first generation in history that will likely not outlive its parents.

You might say that modern doctors, with few exceptions, practice medical warfare, instead of true healing. All medical ethics
have been abandoned for a Rockefeller-Rothschild-Jesuit influenced poisoned needle. In fact, the origins of vaccination, just
one modern medical modus operandi, might shock you.

All Through the Help of a 'Lady'

The history of dumbing down a nation(s) with inoculation is much like the famous tale of the defeat of Troy using a wooden
horse. Inoculation was introduced in India using Lady Montague as a smokescreen. Lady Montague wasn't even a doctor.
Women doctors did not appear until over 100 years later.
Lady Mary Wortley Montagu

In the year 1717, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu was the smokescreen that the Jesuits used to introduce this religious rite into
England. Inoculation or variolation was given the sanction of the Royal Family when two daughters of the Prince of Wales
were vaccinated. Barbaric as this religious rite was; it was the human disease of smallpox that was injected into the
bloodstream. Inoculation was the foot-in-the-door to prepare the people for something far worse.

Inoculation against smallpox is what led to the 'vaccination generation,' but this disease festered in the unsanitary conditions
of poverty - as many illnesses do. Vaccines did not eradicate smallpox, quarantine and the improved and more hygienic
living conditions of people is what stopped it from spreading. Since that time vaccines have been developed to include a
host of carcinogens and other ingredients that could only rightly be called toxic waste.

Just some of the many toxic substances added to vaccines include:

Mercury, which constitutes 49.7% of thimerosal (or thimerosal), realized to be a highly toxic agent. Mercury has strangely
been beloved by allopathy ever since its inception; in fact, the 3 main treatments of the early allopaths of the 19th century
were bloodletting, surgery and the injection of toxic heavy metals like lead and mercury to purportedly displace disease.

Aluminum, a known neurotoxin. One peer reviewed study suggests, "aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for
autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and
widespread adverse health consequences."

Aborted Fetal Cells/Human DNA. This is not a rare occurrence. Former drug company scientist Helen Ratajczak says that
over 23 vaccines contain aborted human tissue with an uncanny link to autism. Another study by Dr. Deisher found a
connection between the injection of human diploid cells and autism as well.

MSG (monosodium Glutamate) - If just one meal containing MSG can cause serious headaches, what do you think it can
do to the body when injected into the bloodstream via a vaccine? Processed glutamic acid can cause brain lesions and
neurotoxicity. This adjuvant is added to MMR vaccines and others.
 Animal cells. All sorts of animals are used for this, including chickens, pigs, dogs, monkeys, horses, rabbits, cows and
more. All these animal cells remain in trace amounts in the vaccine, as admitted by the FDA. Marti Oakley in an article on
Activist Post entitled "Vaccines: Human and Animal DNA" points out that:

Cell lines, which can be derived from aborted human babies, can last for decades and are developed from a single
type of cell. Yet it is known that after continuous culturing these lines begin to mutate into cancer-causing agents.

If these cell lines do this spontaneously in the lab, what are the chances they are doing the same thing once inside
the human body where the culturing never ends? ...

We are being injected via vaccine with bits and pieces of other human beings; with the bits and pieces of other
mammals.

Whatever the intended purpose of vaccines was initially, it is apparent that too little is either known or
acknowledged regarding the potential adverse side affects from co-mingling the DNA of humans and animals and
the potential for viral and bacterial cross-contaminations that can and do occur.

The IARC's 'definite carcinogen' Formaldehyde. This chemical is used as a preservative and biocide, commonly to
embalm the dead. Even the US Department of Health says that this substance is highly carcinogenic. It can also cause brain
damage and seizures.

Also included are antibiotics, squalene, peanuts (which many people are highly allergic too) and GMOs.

History of Vaccination in the Medical Mafia

Ironically, Allopathy Inc was created before the first world war when IG Farben of Germany merged with Rockefeller. As
Guylaine Lanctot explains in The Medical Mafia:

"Vaccination stimulates the immune system, the body's defense mechanism. Repeated vaccination exhausts the
immune system. It gives a false sense of security and, in doing so, it opens the door wide to all kinds of illnesses.

Notably, to those related to AIDS, which can only develop on ripe ground, where the immune system has been
disturbed. It causes AIDS to explode. It ensures that the illness flourishes perpetually.

Vaccination leads to social violence and crime. What better way to destabilize a country than to disarm its
inhabitants, and reinforce police and military control?

The authorities subtly create situations of panic and fear among the population which, in turn, necessitate
the reinforcement of 'protection measures', including forbidding citizens from owning weapons. The authorities
then come across as saviours and strengthen their control.

It is certain that, in order to impose a single world army, one must first disarm the citizens of every country. One
must therefore create violence, if they are to achieve this disarmament, particularly in the United States where the
right to bear arms is guaranteed by the Constitution."

So how exactly do eradicate disease instead of vaccinating ourselves into delirium and oblivion?

True Secret to Health

The answer is known to Ayurvedic and Chinese medicine practitioners, and to the true healers of ancient times. When the
body is cleared of obstructions and toxins, the immune system can flourish, and fights all manner of microbes, superbugs,
and viruses, all on its own.

Three Types of Ama

'Chikitsatam vyadhikaram pathyam sadharanam aushadam prayshitam prakritisthapanprashanam itaman.'

Translated, this Sanskrit text says we should "eliminate that which is not wholeness, that which is disrupting, by that which is
suitable for the self, using procedures and preparations to restore the self, to re-establish prakriti (wholeness our
essential nature) and pacify by that which is conducive to health."

In the West, we concentrate on manifest illness, and try to cure the body after it is well past its most prime ability to cure
itself. In other cultures, dis-ease is handled while it is in its infancy, so that it can never take over the body in various forms
of cancer, heart-disease, diabetes and more.

We have between 50-75 trillion cells, and they cannot respirate properly - that is obtain nutrients and expel waste, if they are
not given a pure environment. Ayurvedic texts refer to the bioaccumulated environmental toxins, poor dietary habits, and the
eventual mixing of toxins with our bodies' cells, three stages of Ama, which does not translate directly into English, but most
closely can be thought of as waste or toxicity.

Ama starts in the mind in the Ayurvedic culture, such as the erroneous thinking that leads us to make poor food and lifestyle
choices. It later causes us to take up habits that allow toxic substances, both metabolic and environmental to clog up our
digestive system, which eventually leads to horrible immunity.

The Root of All Disease

The very basic function of the immune system is to keep 'bad' things out, 'good' things in. If you think of it - this is exactly
what the digestive system does when it is working correctly.

Dysbiosis is what happens when the 'bad' bacteria are running the show in your gut, instead of the 'good' bacteria that forms
roughly 90% of your immunity. The standard American Diet (SAD) promotes bad bacteria in the gut instead of good
bacteria, and once vaccinations are introduced into this environment, the immune system is often taxed beyond its capacity,
leading to chronic disease, neurological failure, and in many cases, complete morbidity.

Simply put, ridding the digestive system of toxins, will restore the proper gut balance, and the body can heal itself from
almost anything. This is why the concept of 'saucha' or cleanliness is a cornerstone of all yogic practices, and cleanses,
such as Shankha Prakshalana , are carried out with almost religious fervor to protect against disease.

As Jay Pasricha, M.D., director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Neurogastroenterology, reiterates, the gut-brain is hidden
within the tissues of your digestive organs:

"The enteric nervous system doesn't seem capable of thought as we know it, but it communicates back and forth
with our big brain - with profound results. "

That communication is so profound, it can even cause changes in your mood. Interactions between nerve signals, gut
hormones and microbiotathe bacteria that live in the digestive system also signal the immune system to attack foreign
invaders, instead of 'go to sleep' or attack the body itself.

Vaccinations were meant to 'dirty' the body and mind. Ancient healing practices were meant to clean them.

You can choose your own path to health, but hopefully this information makes the decision to abstain from allopathic
medicine a more interesting one.
Indian Doctors Sue Bill Gates For Harming Children With Deadly 'Humanitarian'
Vaccines + Dr. Robert Rowen Reveals The Raw Truth About Vaccines At The Vaccine
World Summit
December 16 2015 | From: NaturalNews / GlobalResearch

If Monsanto, the most evil corporation in the world, were a person, his name would be Bill Gates.

Yes, the Microsoft founder-turned-icon of Third World humanitarianism is an absolute crook, and an utterly vile one
at that.

Related: Doctor Explains Why Vaccine Policies and Injections In Children Are An 'Egregious Crime'

Reports indicate that Gates' many crimes against humanity in the form of illegal vaccine testing on innocent children are
finally being addressed in a new lawsuit filed by the Indian government, which seeks to stop this demon of death from killing
any more babies.

The Supreme Courts of India are currently conducting an extensive investigation into the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's
devious actions abroad, which mainly involve testing deadly vaccines on poor, and oftentimes illiterate, children in
developing nations without informed consent.

According to Health Impact News, the case focuses specifically on illicit human experimentation that occurred with the two
available vaccines for HPV, Cervarix (GlaxoSmithKline) and Gardasil (Merck & Co.).
Back in 2009, the Gates Foundation quietly funded trials of Gardasil on some 16,000 tribal school children living in Andhra
Pradesh, India. According to a report published in Economic Times India back in August, many of the children fell violently ill
not long after receiving the vaccine, and at least five of them died.

In a separate trial of Cervarix that took place around this same time, also funded by the Gates Foundation, an estimated
14,000 tribal children in Vadodara, Gujarat, were vaccinated for HPV. The result of this trial was two children dead and
possibly hundreds of others severely injured. In both trials, many of the consent forms used were obviously forged, and
many of the children's illiterate parents were coerced into signing consent forms with their thumbprints, not really know what
they were doing.

A petition condemning these atrocious crimes against humanity notes that the Gates Foundation, as well as the World
Health Organization (WHO) and the Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH), both of which supported the
trials, were "criminally negligent" for testing deadly vaccines on:

a vulnerable, uneducated and under-informed population [of] school administrators, students and their parents
who were not provided informed consent or advised of potential adverse effects."

It wasn't until a non-governmental organization known as SAMA began investigating the two trials that these Nazi-like
experiments on human beings were finally brought to light. But none of the controlled media in the U.S., or anywhere else in
the West for that matter, agreed to cover it. The only country that took notice was India, which is now seeking justice against
Gates and his band of vaccine terrorists.

Gates Foundation also responsible for killing kids with untested meningitis, polio and 5-in-1
pentavalent vaccines
Related: The Polio VACCINE is Causing the New Polio

Sadly, this isn't the only time that Gates and his crew were found to have committed evil acts against the world's most
vulnerable.

In December 2012, five children in the small town of Gouro, Chad, were forcibly vaccinated with a meningitis A vaccine that
was still in trials and not even approved for commercial use.

The children were told that if they didn't agree to the vaccine, which was administered without parental consent, they would
not be allowed to receive any further education.

And again in 2013, both the Gates Foundation and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, were exposed for forcing untested polio
vaccines and 5-in-1 pentavalent vaccines on innocent children in Pakistan. Many of the children developed so-called "non-
polio acute flaccid paralysis," or NPAFP, which reports indicate is twice as deadly as polio itself.

More on the Gates Foundation's extensive legacy of killing children with vaccines is available here:
VacTruth.com.
Dr. Robert Rowen Reveals the Raw Truth About Vaccines at the Vaccine World
Summit

Related: Former Merck Scientists File Suit Against Merck Under the False Claims Act

Vaccine science as its most typically presented to the public is a hollow house of cards propped up only by deception and
lies. Ask any doctor out there to show you even just one all-cause morbidity and mortality study proving the safety and
effectiveness of vaccines and youll never get to see it, because such a study is nonexistent.

Johns Hopkins University graduate Dr. Robert Rowen has been investigating the claims surrounding the safety and
effectiveness of vaccines for many years, and his undeniable conclusion is that vaccines dont work and they arent
safe. The measures by which the modern medical profession claims that vaccines are safe and effective dont hold water,
he maintains, and are easily disproven.

In China, well over 90 percent of large populations are getting vaccinated, and allegedly they have immunity, and
they measure immunity by immunoglobulins, explained Dr. Rowen during a recent interview with
NaturalHealth365.com host Jonathan Landsman, which is available online for free through the Vaccine World
Summit.

It turns out that thats not a good way to measure immunity because people with immunoglobulins are getting
measles. It just doesnt seem to work.

Vaccines provide only temporary immunity at best, and come with a high risk of permanent health damage.

A widespread misconception holds that vaccines are the only way to attain immunity and avoid infectious disease. But quite
the contrary is actually true, as vaccines only provide temporary immunity, at best, while simultaneously and significantly
increasing the risk of immune dysfunction, behavioral disorders and other major health problems.

Theres a graph of how these communicable diseases have fallen since the introduction of vaccines, and a
corresponding, parallel, identical rise in chronic immune dysfunction, like asthma, arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and
others, warns Dr. Rowen, who used to advocate for vaccines before he understood their true risks.

No one has ever done an all-cause morbidity and mortality study on the effectiveness and safety of vaccines, and
thats what Ive called for since 1990 when I first got alerted to the situation.
Chronic disease has skyrocketed among children alongside massive additions to vaccine schedule.

Dr. Rowen cites a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) back in 2010 that highlights
a doubling in the rate of chronic health conditions among children between the years of 1994 and 2006 from 12.8
percent to 26.6 percent. This directly corresponds with substantial increases in the number of vaccines added to the
governments vaccine schedule.

Another study he references demonstrated that infant mortality rates are higher among vaccinated children.

Do we want to be trading a few less problems with measles, or these other illnesses which are far more benign -
mumps is benign, chicken pox is benign, German measles, rubella is totally benign [unless it's caught by a
pregnant woman] - do we want to be trading a few less complications from that for a doubling in chronic [immune]
diseases that we cant treat? asks Dr. Rowen.

Id rather have lifelong immunity than deal with getting a shot when Im 18 months old and then get temporary
immunity, at best, and then have it wear off when Im 30 or 40 and be far more susceptible to a problem because
these are disease that you dont want to get when youre an adult.

If the vaccine is safe and effective, then you go get your vaccine. I have no problem with that. You take the 26
percent risk of chronic, intractable, untreatable diseases, or autism, for your child But dont blame me, because
your child is immune based on your choice, if what you say is true. And if what you say is a lie, then you have a
problem.

Be sure to listen to the full, eye-opening interview with Dr. Rowen by signing up for the Vaccine World Summit:
VaccineWorldSummit.com.

Molecular Biologist Explains How THC Completely Kills Cancer Cells

December 13 2015 | From: WhatsTrending

Below is a video of Dr. Christina Sanchez, a molecular biologist at Compultense University in

Madrid, Spain, clearly explaining how THC (the main psychoactive constitute of the cannabis plant)
completely kills cancer cells.
Not long ago, we published an article examining a case study recently published where doctors used cannabis to
treat Leukemia, you can read more about that here. To read more articles and view studies about how cannabis is
an effective treatment and cure for cancer, click here.

Cannabinoids refer to any group of related compounds that include cannabinol and the active constituents of cannabis. They
activate cannabinoid receptors in the body. The body itself produces compounds called endocannabinoids and they play a
role in many processes within the body that help to create a healthy environment.

I think its also important to note that cannabis has been shown to treat cancer without any psychoactive effects.

Cannabinoids have been proven to reduce cancer cells as they have a great impact on the rebuilding of the immune system.
Although not every strain of cannabis has the same effect, more and more patients are seeing success in cancer reduction
in a short period of time by using cannabis.

Contrary to popular belief, smoking cannabis does not assist a great deal in treating disease within the body as therapeutic
levels cannot be reached through smoking. Creating oil from the plant or eating the plant is the best way to go about getting
the necessary ingredients, the cannabinoids.
The world has come a long way with regards to accepting this plant as a medicine rather than a harmful substance. Its a
plant that could benefit the planet in more ways than one. Cannabis is not something offered in the same regard as
chemotherapy, but more people are becoming aware if it, which is why its so important to continue to spread information
like this. Nobody can really deny the tremendous healing power of this plant.

Putins New Plan To Become #1 Scares Monsanto Big Time

December 11 2015 | From: Infowars

Russias Vladimir Putin is taking a bold step against biotech giant Monsanto and genetically
modified seeds at large.

In a new address to the Russian Parliament Thursday, Putin proudly outlined his plan to make Russia the worlds
leading exporter of non-GMO foods that are based on ecologically clean production.

Perhaps even more importantly, Putin also went on to harshly criticize food production in the United States, declaring
that Western food producers are no longer offering high quality, healthy, and ecologically clean food.

"We are not only able to feed ourselves taking into account our lands, water resources Russia is able to become
the largest world supplier of healthy, ecologically clean and high-quality food which the Western producers have
long lost, especially given the fact that demand for such products in the world market is steadily
growing, Putin said in his address to the Russian Parliament.

This is far from over. The dealmakers havent disclosed the details they should immediately but when they do, expect
outrage. The US congress may be our greatest ally.

And this announcement comes just months after the Kremlin decided to put a stop to the production of GMO-containing
foods, which was seen as a huge step forward in the international fight to fight back against companies like Monsanto. Using
the decision as a launch platform, its clear that Russia is now positioning itself as a dominant force in the realm of organic
farming.
It even seems that Putin may use the countrys affinity for organic and sustainable farming as a centerpiece in his economic
strategy.

"Ten years ago, we imported almost half of the food from abroad, and were dependent on imports. Now Russia is
among the exporters. Last year, Russian exports of agricultural products amounted to almost $20 billion a
quarter more than the revenue from the sale of arms, or one-third the revenue coming from gas
exports, he added.

Regardless of what you think about Putins politics, the fact that non-GMO farming and organic food production is
now such a key part of the international discussion is beyond exciting (and long overdue).

Electromagnetic Radiation And Other Weapons Of Mass Mutation

December 4 2015 | From: WakingTimes

Have the elite already become mutated versions of human beings?

Physicist and former military expert on microwave radiation, Barrie Trower has stated, There are no safe levels of
radiation. Upon watching Barry Trowers startling video interview (seen below,) it appears evident that the elite
and their techno-nerd minions may already be mutants.
Among other things, Trowers report includes consideration of the effects of cell phone and electromagnetic radiation (EMR)
on the brainwaves and development of children. Can we conclude that people who are constantly being bombarded by
these pernicious EMRs no longer think as normal human beings?

The brain of anyone who is surrounded by microwaves, RF radio frequencies, etc., confined in control rooms, military, IT,
financial, or whatever environment bombards them 24/7 with EMR electromagnetic radiation - is not going to function the
same way as a brain in harmony with nature and the planet.

Imagine living in one of those smart houses where you are submerged in an ocean of WiFi high-tech remote-control of
pretty much everything, from lighting and heating to the security gate, baby monitors, CCTV cameras and audiovisual
equipment.

This powerful video explains the truth regarding microwave weaponry and other exotic weapons (psychotronic,
electromagnetic, Radio Frequency, HAARP, GWEN towers, ELF waves) used by The United States & other nations
worldwide. Furthermore, it explains why the Police State mentality is seemingly worldwide now. Dr Barrie Trower in a sit
down interview tells all to ICAACT.

Contemplating the destructive effects from EMR on our brains, Nicholas Carr in, The Shallows, What the Internet is Doing to
Our Brains, writes:

The Nets cacophony of stimuli short circuits both conscious and unconscious thought, preventing our mind from
thinking deeply or creatively. Heavy use has neurological consequences.

as the time we spend hopping across links, crowds out the time we devote to quiet reflection and contemplation,
the [brain] circuits that support those old intellectual functions and pursuits weaken and begin to break apart. The
brain recycles the disused neurons and synapses

Impede Comprehension & Retention

One wonders how this kind of entrainment by the machine will damage our capacity for any deep thinking. This redirection
of our mental resources, and making judgements that are imperceptible to us, as Nicholas Carr says, have been shown to
impede comprehension and retention. Carr quotes the German philosopher, Martin Heidegger, who back in the 1950s said:

the looming tide of [the] technological could so captivate, bewitch, dazzle and beguile man that calculative
[quantitative] thinking may someday come to be accepted and practiced as the only way of thinking.

The frenzy of quantity over quality, jumping from one focus to the next, using only a small part of the brain may destroy our
capacity for quiet contemplation and meditation. The state of a calm and attentive mind cultivated in silence is the only
source of all genuine creativity and innovation. Are these new masters of the universe who we are in fact allowing the
transformation of the very way our brains operate are they true masters of their own consciousness, or are they
some kind of mutants already?
Geoengineering & Chemtrails

Most human beings cannot believe that anyone could be so evil as to poison their own populations, permanently destroying
the land & water, killing animals, birds & insects.

This is the primary reason the majority still refuse to believe - even when we have seen chemtrails with our own eyes - and
continue to deny that the skies are being sprayed with toxic aluminum, barium, strontium, and nano-particulates that
suppress the immune system, make us sick, depressed, and cause dementia and ADHD. What monsters would do such a
terrible thing?

Perhaps understanding that EMR electromagnetic radiation mutates brain waves is the answer. Is the elite is so immersed
in destructive radiation, so cut off from natures healing frequencies, and so obsessed with their own power games and
greed that they no longer are human in the sense we have always understood? Has the pervasive canopy of EMR
destroyed the capacity for compassion and respect for life in the elite?

The Signal to OBEY!

Consider the H.G. Wells story & film, The Time Machine that depicts a future where young humans are breed for food for
the mutants in control. These young clueless innocents are allowed to live in a fools paradise until they are summoned by a
signal - perhaps emitted from a microwave tower - a signal they have been entrained to obey.
Obedience to the call of the frequency emitter draws them into an inescapable cavern where they are slaughtered for food
or used as breeders for the reproduction of the mutants food supply. Is this where we are headed?

The Truth About Cancer

December 2 2015 | From: TheTruthAboutCancer

28 Doctors, 11 Scientists, 9 Survivors and 1 "FDA Dragon Slaying" Attorney Break Their 'Code Of
Silence' and Expose The TRUTH About Cancer And Exactly How To Prevent, Treat And Beat It
100% Naturally.
The Documentary Series The Mainstream Media Refused To Air Is Now Playing Online.

This documentary series regarding cancer could be the most comprehensive ever made, and the information provided has
the potential to wipe out cancer from this world once and for all.

Learn why only about 2% of cancer sufferers live more than 5 years beyond their chemotherapy or radiation treatments.
Think this doesn't affect you? In this current generation, 1 out of every 2 males, and 1 out of every 3 females will die as a
result of cancer. If nothing else, watch the first episode; this is life changing.

If any of the links below become inactive, search 'The Truth about Cancer - A Global Quest' on youtube.

Episode 1: The True History of Chemo & The Pharmaceutical Monopoly

Episode 2: Your First Line of Defense.

Lets end the cancer pandemic once and for all! Every single day, tens of thousands of people, just like you, are curing
cancer (and/or preventing it) from destroying their bodies.

Its time to take matters into our own hands and educate ourselves on real prevention and treatments. It could save your life
or someone you love. Doctors, researchers, experts and survivors show you exactly how-to prevent and treat cancer
in The Quest for The Cures.

Some of the episodes are free to watch and others are paid. See more at: TheTruthAboutCancer

Pharma CEO: Were In The Business Of Shareholder Profit, Not Helping The Sick
December 2 2015 | From: USuncut
Another Pharmaceutical CEO is stepping up to challenge Martin Shkreli as worlds most hated
man.

Last month, Martin Shkreli became a household name. The CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals is now infamous for
raising the price of a newly-acquired drug to $750 a pill.

He also explained in an interview that his company was not alone in acquiring drugs currently on the market to raise their
price and, in turn, rapidly drive up their stock price.
Martin Shkreli

Enter J. Michael Pearson, The current CEO of Valeant Pharmaceuticals who recently said that his companys responsibility
is to its shareholders, while making no mention of his customers who rely on his drugs to live.

If products are sort of mispriced and theres an opportunity, we will act appropriately in terms of doing what I
assume our shareholders would like us to do.

Already this year, Valeant has increased the price of 56 of the drugs in its portfolio an average of 66 percent, highlighted by
their recent acquisition, Zegerid, which they promptly raised 550 percent. Not only does this have the unfortunate side effect
of placing the price of life-saving drugs out of reach for even moderately-insured people, but it has now begun to call into
question the sustainability of this rapidly-spreading business model.
In an interview with CNBC, Pearson defended his business practice of acquiring drugs instead of investing in research and
development.

My primary responsibility is to Valeant shareholders. We can do anything we want to do. We will continue to make
acquisitions, we will continue to move forward.

Since being named CEO in 2008, Valeant has acquired more than 100 drugs and seen their stock price rise more than
1,000 percent with Pearson at the helm. But it appears that all of the public backlash over price gouging of prescription
drugs, which has included both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders taking a stance against the practice as a platform in their
respective presidential campaigns, has placed the practice under tremendous scruitiny.

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is planning to issue a subpoena for information on recent
price increases from both Pearson and Shkreli.

And that pending investigation has sent Valeants stock price tumbling more than 27 percent in the last month, which may
have shareholders concerned enough to wonder if Pearson pushed too hard for too long.

Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity From Microwave Technology Finally Medically

Proven
November 24 2015 | From: ActivistPost

Finally, theres documented medical proof that electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a real-time

health issue that actually can be verified using standard medical procedures and testing
capabilities.

An international group of researchers aced it when they published their findings from the clinical study Metabolic
and Genetic Screening of Electromagnetic Hypersensitive Subjects as a Feasible Tool for Diagnostics and
Intervention in the November 2014 issue of Mediators of Inflammation.

Related: Microwave radiation dangers in your home

So, the million-dollar-question has to be;

When will utility companies get up to speed on the latest in microwave technology damage to the human body?

Also, When will public utility commissions nationwide institute proper procedures to protect consumers from such
damage?

Pennsylvanians currently are being bombarded by non-thermal health problems from public utility companies electric,
natural gas and water Smart Meters, which operate using microwave technology.

Furthermore, the PA House Consumer Affairs Committee Chair Robert Godshall sits on Opt-Out Bills that will permit
electrosensitive consumers and others to keep safe analog meters, which have been in use for decades.

Below is the Press Release Pennsylvania Smart Meter Awareness (PASMA) released November 19, 2015, which discusses
pertinent issues to EHS and Smart Meters.

Medical Studies Conform Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Are Utility Smart Meters Causing
Health Problems?

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity, or electrosensitivity (EHS), is a condition affecting more and more individuals who are
exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and radiofrequencies (RFs) from radios, televisions, Wi-Fi, dirty electricity
coming over household wires from utility companies smart meters (SMs), microwaves, photocopiers, plus cell phones and
towers.

Worldwide, the numbers of people affected by EMFs and RFs increase exponentially, and add to other environmentally
sensitivity-related illnesses such as multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), sick building
syndrome, Persian Gulf War veteran syndrome, and amalgam disease.

In Pennsylvania, childrens and adults health is being harmed by electric, natural gas, and water utility companies smart
meters!

The World Health Organization (WHO), in a December 2005 Background paper, stated:

EHS is characterized by a variety of non-specific symptoms that differ from individual to individual. The symptoms
are certainly real and can vary widely in their severity. Whatever its cause, EHS can be a disabling problem for the
affected individual. [.]

For EHS individuals with long lasting symptoms and severe handicaps, therapy should be directed principally at
reducing symptoms and functional handicaps. This should be done in close co-operation with a qualified medical
specialist (to address the medical and psychological aspects of the symptoms) and a hygienist (to identify and, if
necessary, control factors in the environment that are known to have adverse health effects of relevance to the
patient).

Treatment should aim to establish an effective physician-patient relationship, help develop strategies for coping
with the situation and encourage patients to return to work and lead a normal social life."

WHO published online information about that workshop on electromagnetic hypersensitivity in 2004 here

PASMA wants to remind the Pennsylvania state legislature and the PA Public Utility Commission (PUC) that EHS is a
harmful health - and even-life-threatening - issue for those affected, which utility companies are remiss about, in
understanding that harm, by denying that such effects are medically proven and that SM-caused EHS cannot - and will not -
be mediated by replacing AMI SMs with EMF-free analog meters, which were used safely for decades, and which other
states utility companies are allowing. The control factor in the environment relevant to many EHS problems is traceable to
the installation of smart meters on home properties.
PASMA further wants to point out what the WHO stated at the EMF workshop, which utilities, the PA legislature and PA
PUC need to implement: help develop strategies for coping with the situation and encourage patients to return to work and
lead a normal social life.

Related: Parents sue school for son's illness caused by Wi-Fi electropollution

For those EHS individuals impacted by SMs, legal opt-outs from SMs are a necessary ethical and medical exception to PA
129, and must be granted. SM-induced health issues are serious matters, which need to be addressed intelligently by state
officials, and very soon, as too many Pennsylvanians cannot lead normal lives due to Smart Meters.

PASMA respectfully directs PA legislators and the PA PUC to clinical studies in the journal Mediators of
Inflammation Volume 2014, Article ID 924184, where researchers published their results regarding EHS.

In their clinical study Metabolic and Genetic Screening of Electromagnetic Hypersensitive Subjects as a Feasible Tool for
Diagnostics and Intervention published as an open access article, they say,

Till now, no causal relationship between electromagnetic fields exposure and onset of clinical symptoms has been
clearly proven. [.]

The profiles of metabolic parameters alteration observed in EHS subjects were comparable to those of the pure
MCS group, though generally less pronounced (Figures 58). Similarly to those MCS patients self-reportedly
nonelectrosensitive, the EHS cohort showed a highly significant-versus-control decrease in the erythrocyte GST
activity and an increase in GPX activity levels (Figure 5), coupled with a marked decrease of GSH levels (Figure
6). [.]

A second parameter proved to be significantly different () between EHS and MCS groups that is the ratio omega-
6/omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in the erythrocyte membrane phospholipid fraction (Figure 7(c)). [.]
 Further developments must necessarily include a more objective and standardized classification of individual
electromagnetic sensitivity scores, to conclusively assess the proposed parameters as a distinctive and specific
panel of disease biomarkers for EHS.

Our findings will hopefully contribute, in combination with the so-far putative genetic-risk factors, a better molecular
definition of environmental-borne sensitivity-related illnesses and a tool to discriminate single SRI comorbidities,
based on sufficiently proven molecular evidences able to gain clinical consensus."

Smart Meter technology is based on microwaves, which is damaging the health of Pennsylvanians; has to be corrected by
the PA legislature and PA PUC, since its counter to and, undoubtedly, violates the Nuremberg Code, including the Third
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which states: The right of the people to be secure in their personsshall not be
violated.

Certainly, Pennsylvanias childrens and adults health status is being compromised and violated 24/7/365 from EMFs, RFs,
and the dirty electricity produced by Smart Meters.

Related: Parents success in stopping WiFI installation at Australian school

Auckland Council Rejects Fluoridation For Onehunga

November 8 2015 | From: Scoop / FluorideFreeNZ

Auckland Council Rejects Fluoridation for Onehunga in Landslide: Auckland Councillors yesterday
overwhelmingly voted to reject a proposal to add hazardous fluoride chemicals to the drinking
water of Onehunga residents, voting 18 to 3 against the motion.

The vote is in keeping with councils around the country not wanting to take responsibility for the fluoridation
debate. Currently 23 out of 67 councils allow fluoridation and all are faced with increasing evidence and
international concern that water fluoridation is linked to thyroid problems, lowered IQ and fluorosis.
Related: Fluorine Compounds Make you Stupid - Why is the Government not merely allowing, but promoting them?

These health risks are difficult to square when the recorded and actual dental benefits of fluroride come from applying
flouride to the outside of teeth, not by swallowing.

The vote on whether to fluoridate the water supply in Onehunga was revisited because fluoridationists argue that 2001 was
a long time ago and we need to review the feeling in the community. This argument flies in the face of the gold standard,
international Cochrane Review that found no modern reliable evidence that fluoridation actually reduces dental decay.

Speaking at the council meeting yesterday ahead of the vote, Fluoride Free NZ Auckland Representative, Kane Titchener,
raised concerns the US Public Health Service this year recommended to lower the allowable maximum target for fluoridation
to 0.7ppm, down from a range of 0.7 - 1.2ppm.

The Ministry of Healths recommendation is a range 0.7 1.0ppm with most councils (including Auckland) opting for a target
of 0.85ppm. The NZ Ministry of Healths recommendation is now significantly higher than what is allowed in the United
States.

To put yesterdays vote into context, a referendum was held in what was the Onehunga Borough in 2001 which resulted in
66% of voters opposing fluoridation. The residents of Onehunga understand the fluoridation issue better than most.

When Metro Water was in charge of supplying drinking water to many households in Onehunga, 2000 households
requested notification of any planned maintenance shutdowns to ensure that they could make alternative arrangements to
access non-fluoridated drinking water.

RT: Abby Martin takes with a look at the long practice of water fluoridation

This notification is possibly the greatest example of informed consent regarding fluoridation in New Zealand. Watercare
Services Ltd no longer provides this service citing cost as the reason.

In another vote on fluoridation yesterday, the results of a referendum in the currently fluoridated township of Thames found
that most of the 3000 people who voted wanted to continue fluoridation. Thames is a conservative community with a high
percentage of retired people.
Fluoride Free NZ believes the case put forward by those wishing to force fluoridation on the whole Thames community
amounted to very little more than believe us, were the experts. It is doubtful that any of those who voted to continue
fluoridation realise that fluoride has no health benefits to teeth when swallowed in drinking water.

Fortunately for the residents of Onehunga, Auckland Councillors yesterday considered all the facts presented on water
fluoridation and voted No.

Related: Are You Fluoridated?

Are You Ready To Give Up Water?

November 7 2015 | From: NZCPR

Yes, its really come to this. While youve been debating whether or not to give up your flag, your
governments been preparing to give up control of your drinking water.

On Waitangi Day, iwi leaders issued an ultimatum to the government to surrender control of the nations fresh
water to Maori tribes within a year.

And believe it or not, your government is complying!

Co-governance. No comeback.

In April, the government met with iwi leaders to work out how to manage the surrender. Together, they decided to hand over
control of fresh water to iwi at regional council level. Catchment by catchment. Council by council.

Those regional councils and unitary authorities will then appoint unelected iwi representatives, and give them voting rights to
control water. Iwi want priority rights to water in perpetuity.

Memorandum says Iwi trumps Kiwi.

It gets worse. While iwi leaders have been busy consulting their people about the plan, your governments been hiding it
from you. Their trick: to let councils sneak iwi water control clauses into complex fresh water management plans.

In August, Local Government New Zealand agreed in a Memorandum of Understanding with the Iwi Chairs Forum that they
acknowledge the mana and kaitiakitanga status of iwi over the nations land and natural resources.

Is that fine with you?

How can this be happening?

Since 2008, the Maori Party, supported by 1% of New Zealanders, has effectively held the balance of power in Parliament.
And with it, the power to demand 50% co-governance of our natural resources.
And what has been your governments response to this outrageous assault on the democratic rights of all New Zealanders?
Appeasement.

Five ways to fight back.

1. Get the full details (yes, theres more) by visiting www.nzcpr.com

2. Phone or write to your local MP, government MPs, opposition MPs and the Prime Minister. Tell them: You dont have my
permission to give away my water! Ask them: If its OK to have a binding referendum on which flag we fly, why cant we
vote on who controls the water we drink? Then ask: Where do youstand?

3. Do the same with your regional councillors. Theyre the ones who are voting to give unelected iwi the power to control
your water. Demand a local referendum to get ratepayers approval before doing such deals.

4. Tell your family and friends to do the same in person, by email and on Facebook and Twitter. Show them this ad.

5. Ads like this cost big money donate so we can run more.

Comment: This is the same thing playing out worldwide, the privatisation of water. Except in the case of New
Zealand it is the crown operatiing in collusion with corrupt iwi corporations (run by the 'Maori elite') who are willing
to screw over not only their own tribes but the whole country. This is absolutely despickable and needs to be
exposed.

The Real Reason Holistic Doctors Are Being Murdered And Are Vanishing
November 4 2015 | From: ASheepNoMore

In non-technical language, videographer Professor Doom1 explains that PIG PHARMA is

introducing a type of protein (Nagalase) into vaccines that is inhibiting the bodys natural immune
function which is then leading to disease states such as autism to cancer.
Visit the GcMAF website here

In addition, the videographer connects the dots between Dr. Bradstreet, GcMAF, cancer cures and the suppression
of medical science by the U.S. government.

This information needs to be shared everywhere to expose the truth about the cancer industry and to save the lives of
holisitc Doctors. If the information about this spreads the genie can not be put back in the bottle.

Mainstream Medicine Accidentally Handed Us Hard Core Backhanded Proof That

Vaccines Cause Autism
November 3 2015 | From: CureZone

I did not know this up until yesterday, but mainstream medicine handed us hardcore proof that
vaccines cause autism, in a way that can never be put away. Up until the year 2000, Asian
countries had their own vaccine manufacturing, and provided their own for themselves.
But after this, they mostly began purchasing vaccines from American and European firms, and when they did,
autism rates exploded by hundreds of times over. I am talking increases of over 20,000 percent.

Related: Reality Check: CDC Scientist Admits Data of Vaccines and Autism Was Trashed

And one would be a fool to believe it is not intentional, the people who make the shots are not stupid. Who is at the hub of
the new world order, which needs a stupid and complacent populace? American and European Jewry. And I am not going
into how British royalty is part of it all, and most likely Jewish as well because that is irrelevant in this case.

POINT PROVEN: After Asian nations started accepting Western vaccines, their autism rates went up to 1 in 35
children. That would be an apocalypse, and obviously, those not destroyed down to full blown autism after
vaccination are mostly destroyed anyway. "Still functioning" does not mean you got away unscathed.

The biggest war against the world's people is happening via the needle. Vaccine trolls will point to cold hard facts - that in
the past vaccines were usually beneficial, while ignoring the other now obvious cold hard fact - that evil people got control of
the supply and are using childhood vaccines as a tool of world domination.
That is all there is to it, and any time you post to a forum or blog that has vaccine trolls running amok, calling people who are
against vaccines "scientific illiterates", make sure you tell the troll they are right - that in the past vaccines worked, and then
back slam saying that now they have been weaponized, and the autism stats are proof.

Say things like "you can put anything in a needle and call it anything you want, and the autism stats clearly prove that what
is in that shot is NOT a vaccine at all". That will get them scrambling.

"Dear troll, I am not going to allow a "vaccine" to "jew" my child's intelligence down".

Dear troll: Can you prove what is in that shot? Scammers are everywhere, have you ever heard of corruption, or are
you that stupid?

Dear troll: Science has indeed proven that vaccines work. But what if the children are now being vaccinated against
their own intelligence? Ever think of that possibility?

Dear troll: GET ALL YOUR SHOTS, that way you won't have to worry about me skipping mine, you will by default be
protected from my ignorance if the shots really work!

We have to win this vaccine war and get the people responsible shut down and called to account. If we do not, we are
finished as a species.

[Sellout Globalist] Minister Open To More GMO's

November 3 2015 | From: 3News

Environment Minister Nick Smith says more genetically modified organisms may get approval for
use in New Zealand and he has dismissed as impractical local councils' opposition to them.

The Environmental Protection Agency this week approved the importation of the Pexa-Vec virus, which is used to
combat liver cancer. It is the first GMO to get New Zealand approval as a human medicine.

[Bought-and-paid for piece of shit] Dr Smith told The Nation today the scientific advice was that there was little chance the
virus would spread or survive outside a tumorous liver.
About 180 New Zealanders died from liver cancer each year, he said.

"We do not want to deny people access to life-saving treatments on the basis of knee-jerk political reactions,
slogans like 'GM-free'."

Dr Smith admitted he was leaving the door open for the threshold for approval of GM changing.

There was an international argument about what was a GMO and what was not.

"When you're bringing in foreign DNA into an organism there's no question in my view that that's a genetically
modified organism."Where it gets more tricky is when there are alterations to the genes of an organism within it."

Humans had been selectively breeding, using techniques to enhance mutations for decades, he said.

"When you use those older techniques of enhancements of the mutations that occur naturally within an organism,
at what point, where is that line?"

There was a wide range of definitions of the line but New Zealand needed to be cautious, he said.
 "New Zealand does have an important brain for natural products, we earn a lot of our living from food products, but
also we are a country that has got a pretty proud heritage of leading in science."

Earlier this year, Hastings District Council declared itself a GMO-free food-producing region, but Dr Smith said it
was "impractical and wrong for councils to try and regulate this separately" .

"It is impractical to have 86 different councils rules around GM. If you get in a car and you drive from Hastings to
Gisborne or to Wairarapa, if you had trees that are GM, there is no biological barrier for those to spread."

Councils were welcome to submit to the EPA, and he had confidence in its robust and thorough processes.

How Computer And Mobile Phone Use Affects Our Blood

October 27 2015 | From: VaccineInformationNetwork

Detecting the presence of EMFs (electro-magnetic frequencies) and measuring their intensity with
a meter is a helpful and important way of safeguarding our and our families health.

Harmful EMFs are e.g. emitted from mobile phone towers, mobile and cordless phones, wireless baby monitors,
computers, modems and so-called smart meters.

Related: EMF the Hidden Danger

Owning an EMF meter enables parents to monitor EMF levels at their childs or childrens school, as Wi-Fi-equipped
computer instruction rooms tend to have high levels of EMF. A mother in a school here in New Zealand was campaigning for
the Wi-Fi internet connection at her sons school to be replaced with wired internet, but I dont know if she succeeded. In
some places, parents have also been campaigning against cell phone masts being installed at or near their childrens
schools.

Neil offers some valuable education about the dangers of radio frequency radiation on his YouTube Channel EMF Safety
Zone. Neil says:
 It is important to eliminate cordless phones from your home and office. In addition, always hardwire computers
with an Ethernet cord, disabling the wireless option on the modem or router. Be sure never to sleep with your cell
phone on standby near your bed. Do not carry the phone on your person ready to receive calls.

The phone shoots out powerful spikes of RF radiation searching for a cell tower every few minutes, even when you
are not using it. This penetrates your entire body and punctures holes in the blood/brain barrier! Never hold a cell
phone to your head, always use speaker phone or a headset (not a Bluetooth!).

These wireless devices cause a major percentage of the health issues that humans beings presently suffer with.

There are now also concerns that EMFs are contributing to the huge, largely vaccine-induced increase in the incidence of
autism among children: Autism and EMF? Plausibility of a pathophysiological link. Discovering and eliminating sources of
EMFs is therefore important, especially as continued exposure to EMFs will also make a childs recovery from
autism difficult if not impossible.

Related: Is there a safe living distance from or to power lines?

When purchasing a meter, ones choice depends on what one wants to measure and how much one is willing to pay. Neil
highly recommends the excellent radio frequency/microwave meter Acousticom 2 RF Meter which measures from 200MHz
all the way up to 8 GHz.

Here are some helpful guidelines for exposure levels as shown on the Acousticom 2 Radio Frequency Meter:

Below 0.05 V/m Few people report ill-effects

Between 0.05 and 0.5 V/m Some people report ill-effects.

Above 0.5 V/m Many sensitive people report adverse effects.

2.5 V/m is 50 times greater than what some scientists regard as safe.

Negative health effects are found at levels of only 0.06 V/m. Anyone with a cordless phone or wireless internet in the
home is exposed to higher levels than this.
Beware Of These 6 Common Household Items That Cause Cancer
October 25 2015 | From: NaturalNews

Most people probably live under the assumption that their place of dwelling is a safe haven from
all the dangers that lurk "out there".

But little do they know that many common household products contain deadly chemicals that are known to cause
cancer, reproductive harm, birth defects and other health damage.

Related: Does Your Bread Contain This Potentially Cancer-Causing Additive?

Here's six of the most popular categories to avoid for the safety of you and your family:

1. Air fresheners. They're a staple in many households, but conventional air fresheners are a hotbed of poisonous
substances that could leave you and your loved ones infertile, brain-damaged or chronically ill. Tests conducted by the
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) found that most air fresheners contain phthalates, which among other things
interfere with male hormone production.
Most air fresheners are also loaded with other cancer-causing volatile organic compounds as well, which interfere with
reproduction, respiration and cellular regeneration. A 2008 study conducted by Anne Steinemann at the University of
Washington found that all air fresheners tested emitted chemicals known to be carcinogenic, meaning they cause cancer.

Instead of toxic commercial air fresheners, stick with all-natural essential oils, which can be applied to the skin or released
into the air from a diffuser.

2. Candles. Similar to commercial air fresheners, many scented candles are also toxic. A study pioneered by the U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) found that nearly half of all scented candles on the market contain lead
wiring in their wicks, which is released into the air upon burning. This lead might make the wicks more stable, but it also
leads to hormone disruption, behavioral disorders and various other health problems.
Many candles are also made of paraffin wax which, when burned, generates two highly toxic compounds, benzene and
toluene, both of which are carcinogenic. Artificial fragrances and dyes are also present in many scented candles, which
when burned end up in your lungs.

3. Art supplies. Cultural enrichment and creativity are both positive aspirations in life, but not when they involve many
conventional art supplies. Many of the epoxy materials, glues, acrylic paints and solvents, drawing utensils and other
supplies used to create art contain chemicals linked to allergies, organ damage and cancer.

The federal Labeling Hazardous Art Materials Act (LHAMA) requires that all art supplies sold in the U.S. bear warnings if
they cause any acute hazards. But manufacturers are not required to provide an ingredients list, which is why it is
recommended that users of such supplies purchase only products that are certified by the Art and Creative Materials
Institute (ACMI).

ACMI-certified products undergo rigorous evaluations by independent toxicologists to make sure that they are safe for
everyone, including small children.

4). Shampoos and conditioners. Toxins in cosmetics is a huge issue today, with many conventional consumer products -
- including some labeled as "natural" or "organic" -- containing ingredients like sodium lauryl sulfate that generate cancer-
causing byproducts when used. Other carcinogenic additives commonly used in hair care products include polyethylene
glycol (PEG) and cocamide DEA.

Safe Cosmetics has put together a list of the safest and most eco-friendly shampoos on the market, which are free of most
or all of the chemicals listed in its "Skin Deep" database, which you can access here: SafeCosmetics.org

5. Antiperspirant deodorants. Millions of people use them daily to cover up foul body odor and reduce armpit
perspiration. But antiperspirant deodorants are a no-go if you want to avoid chemicals like aluminum chlorohydrate, which
can absorb directly into the skin and promote the formation of breast cancer. Aluminum from antiperspirants is also believed
to contribute to brain diseases like Alzheimer's.
Other toxic additives in antiperspirant deodorants include parabens, a class of artificial preservatives that mimics estrogen in
the body and promotes the growth of cancer cells. Parabens are also linked to gastrointestinal damage, nausea and central
nervous system depression.

6. Shower curtains. They might help prevent water from spraying all over the floor, but your average plastic shower
curtain acts something like a radiator for toxic chemical release. Many shower curtains, it turns out, off-gas harmful
chemicals known as volatile organic compounds, or VOCs, that are known to damage the respiratory tract, central nervous
system, liver and kidneys.

If your shower curtain has that unique "new shower curtain smell," it is likely releasing deadly chemicals -- potentially
upwards of 108 different VOCs, in fact -- that are harming you and your children. For this reason, it is important to stick with
only non-toxic, PVC-free shower curtains made without these harmful chemicals.
Some of the best options include shower curtains made from hemp, linen, birch, organic cotton or PEVA, which you can
learn more about here: RonAndLisa.com

In Defense Of Homeopathy
October 23 2015 | From: GreenMedInfo

Homeopathy is here to stay. Despite relentless criticism from skeptics and fundamentalists,
homeopathy has withstood the test of time.

Since its inception over 200 years ago, homeopathy has been the target of almost constant antipathy from the
prevailing school of orthodox medicine. Given so much organized resistance from the mainstream, one would think
that if homeopathy were much ado about nothing it would not have endured.

Related: Important Message Regarding NZ Natural Health And Supplementary Products Bill

It would have withered on the vine a long time ago. And yet it has persisted. No, it thrives - all across the globe - for a
number of very good reasons.

When a German physician named Samuel Hahnemann discovered that a miniscule dose of a medicinal substance
designed to mimic the symptom pattern of a sick person could paradoxically provoke a healing response in that same
person, a medical revolution was set in motion.
Dr. Hahnemann referred to this surprising phenomenon as the law of similars. As opposed to the conventional medical
approach, which uses opposites to combat symptoms (antidepressants, anti-inflammatories, antihistamines,
anticonvulsants, etc.), homeopathy represents a different approach to healing, one that uses "likes to cure likes."

The standard treatment for a bee sting or a case of poison ivy might involve the use of an antihistamine to suppress the
inflammatory swelling, redness, and itching.

A homeopathic practitioner, on the other hand, might recommend a highly diluted dose of a medicine made from the
honeybee in the former case, and a similar dose of a medicine made from the poison ivy plant in the latter. It's a little bit like
the use of anti-venoms to treat snakebites, only the doses used in homeopathy are much smaller.
The homeopathic principle of similars can be used to treat not just physical illness, but also mental and emotional issues.
For example, in my own practice I have used homeopathic doses of a plant called Stramonium to successfully help
hundreds of children who had suffered from nightmares, were afraid of the dark, and were unwilling to be alone at night.

Ingesting Stramonium in its crude form can induce a type of delirium characterized by severe agitation and a tremendous
state of fear. In its homeopathically diluted form, it is the antidote to similar states of fear and agitation. It can be a lifesaver
for these kids and their families.

In its heyday in the latter half of the nineteenth century, there were more than 100 homeopathic hospitals in the United
States, 22 homeopathic medical schools, 700 homeopathic physicians in New York State, and thousands more across the
country.

Homeopathy in the U.S. experienced a decline in the early 1900s, largely due to increased regulatory pressure from
orthodox medicine.

The same lack of vision regarding the future of health care is not necessarily true of other countries. Today, there are well
over 200,000 homeopathic practitioners in India alone.
Is it possible that so many doctors and patients could be wrong about a medical therapy that they rely upon for their own
personal health and well-being? I think not.

Criticism of Homeopathy

In spite of the remarkable growth of homeopathy and the testimony of millions of satisfied patients who swear by its
effectiveness, critics insist upon spreading a number of unsubstantiated falsehoods regarding this unique healing modality.

The worst offenders are the ones who call themselves scientific "skeptics." Although they claim to speak for science, their
willful refusal to consider the facts exposes them as anti-scientific defenders of scientistic dogma. Their pathological
disbelief in all things holistic and unconventional is a violation of the open-minded spirit of genuine scientific inquiry.

Let me be clear; for those who seek to discredit homeopathy purely out of bias there should be no obligation on the part of
homeopathy to defend itself. It is a waste of energy to quarrel with a relatively small band of medical fundamentalists who
wish to argue their case using disingenuous tactics. The truth of homeopathy stands on its own merit for any open-minded
individual to examine for him or herself.

Nevertheless, I will venture to answer skeptic's criticisms for the benefit of innocent bystanders, many of whom are puzzled
by the Salem Witch Trial-like atmosphere that surrounds homeopathy. Let's examine these objections to homeopathy one
by one and see how they stand up to scrutiny.

Objection 1: The principle of similars is not logical. It does not make scientific sense

Some object to homeopathy on the grounds that treating an illness with a substance that can cause symptoms similar to that
illness just doesn't make sense.

They fail to grasp that this is essentially the same idea behind many allopathic therapies including allergy shots
andvaccines.

The same principle applies to stimulant drugs used to treat hyperactive children. Amphetamine analogs like Ritalin and
Adderall are known to have a paradoxical calming effect on the nervous systems of children with ADHD.
The difference is that while these conventional treatments involve crude and potentially toxic doses that are administered
uniformly to all individuals, homeopathy tailors its treatment to each individual with doses that are far smaller and, therefore,
far safer.

Skeptics tend to dismiss homeopathy due to its so-called "implausibility." This is a fancy way of saying that, given our
current understanding of biology, it is not plausible to assign a cause-and-effect relationship between homeopathic doses
and their observed effects.

This is really just a tautological argument - a bogus use of logic - employed by skeptics to deny the validity of a phenomenon
that medical science cannot explain in conventional medical terms. In essence, the claim is that, since homeopathy cannot
be explained, it therefore cannot be possible.

If we were to adopt this attitude toward all new unexplained medical phenomena, then medicine would remain forever static
and impervious to change. The implausibility argument amounts to nothing more than a ridiculous self-fulfilling defense of
conventional medical dogma.

Objection 2: Homeopathic doses are too small to have any effect. They are nothing more than
placebos.

Homeopathy-hating skeptics love to mockingly claim that homeopathic medicines are nothing but water. After all, they
surmise, if these medicines are diluted to the extent that homeopaths claim, then they must be devoid of all medicinal
properties. Any observed effects are assumed, therefore, to be placebo effects.

Now, this might be true if homeopathic medicines were just another class of conventional drugs. Drugs are pharmaceutical
grade chemicals that act on a biochemical level to alter or arrest physiologic processes. Although homeopathic remedies are
regulated by the FDA as if they are drugs, no homeopath believes that they act in the same manner as conventional drugs.
Unlike drugs, which must often be taken on a regular basis to maintain their suppressive effects, homeopathic remedies act
as bioenergetic catalysts designed to provoke a healing response from the life force. Dr. Hahnemann, himself, attributed all
genuine healing to the innate wisdom of the "vital force."

Homeopathy is based upon a stimulus-response model of treatment. An effective prescription acts as a stimulus that
initiates a self-healing reaction from the bioenergetic field of the human organism. Once a healing response has begun,
there is no need to repeat the stimulus unless its effect begins to wear off.

Although analysis reveals the presence of material nanoparticles in homeopathic medicines, their impact on the life
force is a bioenergetic one, not a material one. The bioenergetic strength of a remedy is not something that can be
measured in quantitative terms.
It is an energetic property that is gauged by the intensity, depth, and duration of effect that it has upon the living organism.
As an energetic phenomenon, the mechanism of action of homeopathy is best studied by medical professionals with
backgrounds in physics.

Chemical drugs have a reputation for the side effects that they can produce. As chemicals, their sphere of action and
the extent to which they can influence biological systems is limited. Homeopathic remedies, on the other hand, can have a
powerful and far-reaching energetic effect on the entire system.

Those who insist that homeopathic medicines are placebos because there is "nothing there" make the mistake of applying a
biochemical model to a bioenergetic therapy. They simply do not know what they are taking about.

Objection 3. Homeopathy is not scientific.

It's not hard to see how someone who thinks that all medicinal agents must act on a biochemical basis, according to the
tenets of mechanistic medicine, would automatically assume that homeopathy is unscientific.

But this would be a nave conclusion based on lack of information. When critics who have already made up their minds hear
that homeopathy is really a form of energy medicine, their eyes start to glaze over and they begin to chant that familiar
mantra, "woo woo, woo woo."

The great irony is that most diagnostic imaging is energy-based. MRIs, CT scans, ultrasound testing, and thermography all
involve energetics. They are made possible thanks to physics. I don't hear critics crying, woo woo, over MRIs and CT scans.
Even a treatment like radioactive iodine therapy, used to destroy the thyroid gland in cases of hyperthyroidism, is an
energetic intervention.
While radioactive iodine is an example of the destructive use of energy, homeopathy represents the cutting edge of the
constructive use of bioenergetics designed to improve health and promote healing. Those who claim that homeopathy is
unscientific because it is based upon bioenergetic principles demonstrate their lack of scientific understanding.

Homeopathic methodology itself is the very definition of scientific method. Medicinal substances are gathered and their
capacity to cause symptoms in the human organism is studied. These substances are administered in diluted form to
volunteers who are not told what they are receiving.

The symptoms reported by these study subjects are then recorded in great detail. The symptomatic profile of each medicine
is developed and documented in reference texts called materia medicas.
Highly diluted doses of these medicines are then given to sick persons who exhibit similar symptom profiles. The responses
are noted and used to confirm the symptom profiles of these substances and to expand the database of information
regarding their uses.

In this sense, homeopathy is the most empirically reliable medical methodology ever devised. It is based upon direct
experience and real time, real life clinical outcomes and patient feedback. Just because the mechanism of action of
homeopathy is as of yet undetermined does not mean that it does not qualify as a science.

No scientist in his or her right mind dismisses an unusual phenomenon simply because it cannot be explained. Homeopathy
utilizes a sound scientific methodology that can yield remarkable results.

Objection 4. There is no scientific evidence to support homeopathy.

This particular objection to homeopathy is perhaps the most egregious of all. It is simply untrue. By any objective standard, it
is a flat out falsehood. There is a growing mountain of research that demonstrates the positive benefits of homeopathy.

Nevertheless, diehard skeptics who show no interest in factual evidence continue to spread lies to the contrary. When you
hear the statement that there is no scientific evidence in support of homeopathy, you know you are dealing with someone
who is either uninformed, willfully ignorant, a scientific zealot, or a mercenary for PhRMA.

Many who insist that there is no evidence are usually just parroting propaganda that they've heard elsewhere. At best, a
skeptic will acknowledge the existence of a particular homeopathic study, only to then nitpick over the supposed flaws in that
study.

This is a common tactic employed by fundamentalist devotees of scientism. In any event, the studies are there to examine
for all who are genuinely interested. A small sampling of homeopathic research references is provided at the end of this
article.
When it comes to medical research, there are some real issues worth discussing. One such issue is the increasing
unreliability of scientific studies, which are often funded and conducted by vested interests. When drugs approved by the
FDA are taken off the market with such regularity, then the research that justified their approval in the first place must be
called into question.

Another problem is the way in which we define scientific evidence itself. Modern scientists have convinced themselves that
experiential evidence is not real evidence. Patient's reports of their own experiences and physician's firsthand observations
of the patients that they treat have somehow become second-class forms of evidence.

Skeptics tell us that this type of evidence is merely "anecdotal." We are supposed to believe that direct firsthand experience
is inferior to the abstract statistical data produced by modern research trials. A belief like this can only come from armchair
quarterbacks who are out of touch with patient reality.

As far as I am concerned, I glean far more practical information from individual patient case studies than from artificially
homogenized trials involving large groups of patients.

It appears that the Emperor of Research is wearing no clothes. Society as a whole is dazzled by quantitative data - and
seems to have lost its capacity for common sense and sound judgment. We have been bamboozled into believing that
our own experiences cannot be trusted.
This, to me, is the true crisis engendered by modern medicine. Its misguided beliefs regarding experiential evidence have
had a dehumanizing and disempowering effect on doctors and patients alike.

This issue is particularly important to homeopathy because it is an empirical science. In other words, it places a great deal of
emphasis on patient experience. Homeopathic evaluations are heavily influenced by the subjective information provided by
patients regarding their own perceptions of their illnesses.

The standards of evidence used by homeopathy are much broader than those of conventional medicine. Homeopathy is
more inclusive because, in addition to research findings and objective diagnostic information, it respects the value of
subjective patient input.

Conventional medicine places much higher value on objective factors like lab results and imaging tests. It shows little
interest in the subjective evidence that is so important to homeopathy. However, none of this mitigates the fact that there are
numerous conventionally designed clinical trials that point to the benefits of homeopathy.

Objection 5. Homeopathic treatment is dangerous because it prevents patients from obtaining the
"real" medical care that they need.

This objection is just another red herring. Homeopathic treatment is known for its lack of side effects and unparalleled safety
record.

When compared side-by-side, allopathic medicine is far more prone to iatrogenic dangers including allergic reactions, side
effects, adverse events, and complications.

Furthermore, the course of illness is not always predictable. Even a well-chosen antibiotic, for example, may not work,
during which time the patient's condition can worsen. A doctor may diagnose indigestion in a patient who later turns out to
have appendicitis.
These types of events occur all the time. And they can happen to practitioners of all stripes; allopathic, homeopathic, and
otherwise. All practitioners have patients who take turns for the worse, and who get sick in spite of their best efforts. To
argue that this is unique to homeopaths is ludicrous.

The reverse is also true. I have seen my share of patients who, in my medical opinion, could have avoided the side effects
and complications from various drugs or surgical interventions had they chosen to consult me for homeopathic care in the
first place.

In fact, homeopathic physicians have an advantage in the sense that they have training in both conventional and
homeopathic approaches. As it turns out, "real" medical care is not the exclusive province of orthodox medicine.

Homeopathy is here to stay

In spite of relentless opposition, homeopathy has withstood the test of time. It continues to endure deliberate misinformation
campaigns designed to undermine its good reputation. Hard core skeptical ideologues hurl epithets like "junk science" and
"pseudoscience."

Much of the rhetoric coming from these anti-homeopathy mercenaries amounts to defamation of character. They
need to be identified for who they are and held accountable for their libel and slander. These self-proclaimed
defenders of science are the most unscientific hucksters of all.

Homeopathic remedies are manufactured by legitimate pharmacies, regulated by the FDA, and in popular demand among
consumers. But few U.S. physicians show any interest in learning about how homeopathy can help their patients.

Furthermore, the corporate medical establishment views homeopathy as competition. PhRMA can't own
homeopathic medicines exclusively because they cannot be patented.

You can draw your own conclusions about the motivating reasons behind FDA and FTC's recent scrutiny of the marketing
of homeopathic products.

Homeopathic medicines are exceptionally safe precisely because the material quantities involved are so minute. As such,
the likelihood of an allergic reaction or adverse event is virtually nil. One can quibble over whether homeopathic medicines
act as bioenergetic catalysts or whether the life force is a real thing or not.
It doesn't really matter, because the final results are what count. Millions of doctors and patients around the globe can attest
to the positive benefits of homeopathic treatment.

As bioenergetic catalysts, homeopathic remedies have broad and all-encompassing effects on human health. Homeopathy
is truly holistic because it acts on the whole person. Because homeopathic remedies have such deep effects, they are
capable of getting to the root of chronic health problems.

When a homeopathic remedy gets to the root of a problem, the life force ceases to generate symptoms because there is no
further need to call attention to the problem.

Homeopathy is safe, inexpensive, and effective. It represents the cutting-edge of Space Age futuristic medicine precisely
because it transcends the pitfalls of material medicine. In the immortal words of Bones McCoy, "I'm a doctor, Jim, not a car
mechanic!"

Homeopathic research links:

1. Randomised controlled trials in homeopathy. Faculty of Homeopathy.

2. The Evidence for Homeopathy. British Homeopathic Association.

3. Database. Initiative to Promote Research in Homeopathy.

5 Valid Reasons To Stop Using Aluminium - Aluminium Is Toxic To All Life Forms
October 20 2015 | From: NaturalNews / GreenMedInfo

Most people probably think they dont use aluminum all that often. A little bit of aluminum foil here
and there to cover a dish and thats about it, right? Unfortunately, no.
Aluminum can be found in some drinking water, cake mixes, non-dairy creamers, and even your deodorant.

Related: Scientists Researching The Effect Of Aluminum Exposure Appeal To The Public

Our bodies have a hard time knowing what to do with this aluminum and it usually ends up accumulating over time in
the kidney, lungs, liver, brain, and thyroid.

Five Reasons to Stop Using Aluminum Now

1. Damage to your Central Nervous System: This consists of the brain and spinal cord. Studies suggest that aluminum
exposure may be linked to autism, brain disease, and bone disease in children. In adults, aluminum exposure has been
linked to neurological defects similar to Alzheimers.

2. Brain Damage:Studies have shown that aluminum has the ability to create toxic, oxidative stress in the brain.
Unfortunately, your brain can accumulate a lot of aluminum and not be able to rid itself of it. This aluminum store can result
in MS, Attention Deficit Disorder, epilepsy, chronic fatigue syndromes, and Alzheimers, as previously mentioned.

3. Robs the Body of Vitamins: Among the vitamins that aluminum steals from the body are magnesium, calcium, and
iron. Reduced calcium absorption can result in brittle bones and is especially dangerous for elderly people. Iron deficiency
can lead to constant tiredness, weakness, paleness, and lightheadedness. Magnesium is a vitamin that many adults already
do not get enough of, and the amount of aluminum found in so many products only exacerbates this issue. Magnesium is
needed by every organ in your body to work properly. Side effects of low magnesium include constant tiredness, heart
problems, and muscle spasms.

4. It Accumulates: As already mentioned, aluminum accumulates in the body because our system dont know how to get
rid of it. Perhaps even worse, aluminum accumulates in large amounts in the bones. In combination with robbing the body of
calcium, this effect drastically puts you at risk for bone breaks and fractures. It can also lead to osteoporosis.

5. Stresses the Body: Because the body is not meant to consume aluminum and it does not know how to process it, the
consumption of aluminum severely stresses the body out. Aluminum in the system results in oxidative stress on the cells,
which can damage the DNA in those cells and even speeding up the bodys natural aging process.

Needless to say, aluminum is not something that your body likes and it should be avoided as much as possible. Use a
cautious eye when shopping for your deodorant and other beauty products, and even your groceries. Almost any food
additive with the letter E followed by a series of numbers contain aluminum, so stay away!

Juice fasts (full of veggies) may help our bodies get rid of some of the aluminum that has been stored, but it is not a
guarantee. It must be emphasized that our bodies simply are not made to process aluminum, and therefore it should be
avoided as much as possible.

Aluminum is toxic to all Life Forms

The case against aluminum in vaccines

Related: Dr. Chris Shaw: Aluminium In The Body

Many of todays pro-vaccine elite insist that aluminum in infant and child vaccines is totally harmless. Find out the real truth,
with scientific back up. Dr Suzanne Humphries, Internist and Nephrologist, has studied out the issue and shows that Paul
Offits absurd claim that aluminum plays an important role in the development of a healthy fetus is completely made up.
Such statements from a leading vaccine educator are flat out dangerous.

A New Autoimmunity Syndrome Linked to Aluminum In

Can We Continue To Justify Injecting Aluminum Into Children?

The featured video is from a 5 hour seminar on Infant Immunity from last year. The focus in this clip is aluminum. In New
Zealand and Europe, aluminum is spelled and pronounced aluminium.

Related: Nuclear Chemist Publishes Paper Detailing: Aluminum Poisoning of Humanity via Geoengineering

The Science Of The Heart

October 18 2015 | From: UpliftConnect

It does more than pump blood, it started beating before your brain was formed, and it has an
electromagnetic field that can be detected across the room. Its time that we explore the heart of
the matter.
Science is hard at work de-mystifying the role of the heart in our lives and seeing beyond its function of pumping
blood is perhaps the first step in unlocking the potential of living in the frequency of love.

Understanding the secret frequency of Love

This is not romantic love, it is a state of resonance (instead of discord) with your own mind, with the people around you, and
with nature. The key to living in flow involves tuning in to your own center and letting your heart lead.

In my previous article, Beyond the Confines of Intellect we took an honest look at the limitations of only engaging with the
world through our thoughts, thus opening the door to understanding the wisdom inherent in feelings. The heart is actually
part of our cognitive system, sending more messages to the brain than the brain sends to the heart. Electrically, the heart
is 40 60 times stronger than the brain and is many more times stronger than any other electrical impulse in the body.

"The sciences of psychology and medicine are in midst of a major paradigm shift as research findings have
uncovered that the heart is a sensory organ that can learn, hold memory and make independent functional
decisions.

Even more surprising is the fact that the heart displays qualities of neuroplasticity, and that it can reorganize itself
by growing new neural connections, just as the brain can do."

Applied Consciousness International

Neuroplasticity in the brain

Understanding our Heart intelligence

Any Google search regarding heart and science will show a long list of links from the leader in this field of
research, Heartmath. They have pioneered in scientific study, but more importantly they have created practical applications
to this research that are helping individuals thrive. Increasing ones Heart intelligence can have a profound effect on
personal relationships, productivity in the workplace, reduce stress, while increasing optimism and problem-solving abilities.

"By using your heart as your compass, you can see more clearly which direction to go to stop self-defeating
behavior."

Doc Childre and Howard Martin, HeartMath

I think we all know what it feels like to do something we really dont want to do, whether its taxes, a job we arent satisfied
with, or acting out of integrity with our own beliefs. Naturally this creates discordance and stress. Many times we are
experiencing these feelings beneath the surface of our consciousness, yet our body is still responding to the dissonance.

Finding coherence within ourselves

When our thoughts/brain are not in harmony with our feelings/heart this creates strain and resistance within our own system
on a physiological level. Bringing awareness to this process helps us to make choices that have our system working in
harmony with itself, thus increasing energy and producing heightened states of wellbeing. This efficient, optimal, and
harmonious functioning of the various systems within the body is known as coherence.

Want to experience flow? Increase coherence within yourself. Take this same principle and now apply it to your family,
community, and ultimately the planet. The curse of competition has all of humanity, states, nations, religions, working
against each other and against natural systems. The best way to increase global coherence is to increase it on an individual
level.
Thankfully HeartMath has a very simple and effective exercise called Freeze-Frame to help us develop greater coherence. It
is a one-minute technique that allows a major shift in perception. More than positive thinking, it creates a definitive, heartfelt
shift in how we view a situation, an individual or ourselves. When under stress:

Shift out of the head, and focus on the area around your heart.

Keep your attention there for at least ten seconds.

Continue to breathe normally.

Recall a positive time or feeling you had in your life, and attempt to re-experience it.

Remember, try not simply to visualize it, but rather to feel it fully.

Ask a question from the heart: What can I do in this situation to make it different? or What can I do to minimize stress?

Listen to the response of your heart.

Taken from PBS Body and Soul

Hopefully this short blog will help send you on your way to increasing coherence within your system. Take some time to
learn more about Heartmath and if youd like to read more research on the topic, you will enjoy this online PDF. The first
step in healing the discord in the world is to heal it within ourselves. The science of the heart has the capacity to undo our
stress and overwhelm as we transition to a more coherent, peaceful world.

Doctor Robert Scott Bell Explains The History Of Modern Medicine + Why Medical
Researcher Calls Doctors 'The Most Brainwashed People On The Planet'
October 14 2015 | From: TheTruthAboutCancer / iHealthTube

I asked a question about the monopoly of modern medicine and how we got to where we are
today? Dr. Bell explained the journey he took to find the answers to his own health struggles and
found he had been lied to about his body and health.
So he researched the history to discover modern medicine wasnt always around; it was rather new and rooted in
patented petro-based molecules manipulated to produce many different medicines that are not healthy, similar to
alopathic medicine, whereby physicians used mercury on their patients, which is a poison.

Related: NZ, Australia, Canada, England, USA Medical Dictatorship

However, in the late 18th century one doctor realized the problem and created homeopathic medicine from minerals and
plant-based materials in small quantities. Surprisingly soldiers medical kits in the civil war museum from the south contained
homeopathic medicine which shows that America used quality health supplies at one time.
Why Medical Researcher Calls Doctors 'The Most Brainwashed People On The Planet'

If current cancer therapies like chemotherapy and radiation continue to show limited success, why
are doctors still using them as a first option for treatment?

Medical researcher Ty Bollinger talks about why this is still the case but why many won't use those same
treatments on their own family members!

5 Reasons Monsanto Is Crashing And Burning + 17 Countries Saying Goodbye To GM

Crops & The Fight Against Genetic Armageddon
October 14 2015 | From: ActivistPost / CollectiveEvolution / SkyWatch / JournalNeo / NaturalSociety / PressForTruth

Its hard to believe that the once almighty Monsanto is on its knees. But their dirty deeds seem to
have finally caught up with them.
Monsanto shares have already dropped 27 percent this year and they just posted fourth quarter losses wider than
estimates. They also announced cost-saving measures to counter their plunge; deep cuts to their workforce and
exiting the sugarcane business.

Related: The Worlds Most Credible Medical Journal Outlines Bad News For Monsanto

Bloomberg reports:

Monsanto Co. said it will eliminate 2,600 jobs as part of a cost-savings plan, joining a growing list of major
corporations struggling to contain the damage from the decline in world commodities prices.

The St. Louis-based agricultural giant announced the reductions - the equivalent of 12 percent of its workforce - as
it reported a loss of 19 cents a share in the fiscal fourth quarter and warned profit would remain weak through
2016."

Monsanto enjoys a near monopoly on corn and soybean in North America. They appear to have it all; they own the farmers,
the industry, the politicians, and the regulators. And, yet, theyre crashing and burning.
Bloomberg cites slumping commodity prices for Monsantos decline. Like DuPont Co. and Glencore Plc, Monsanto, the
worlds largest seed maker, is taking steps to combat the effects of a commodity slump

However, Here are 5 Real Reasons Monsanto is Tanking:

1. Consumer activism: The market doesnt want herbicide-soaked genetically modified food anymore. As people are
becoming more health conscious, they prefer to eat organic food. Its really that simple.

2. Lawsuits with farmers: Monsanto spends untold resources suing family farms for patent infringement. Farmers are
forbidden from saving patented seeds year to year. Additionally when Monsantos GMO crops pollute neighboring farms,
Monsanto sues those farms too. Not a great business model when your primary customers are farmers. An organic farmer
in Australia is hoping to reverse this revolting practice.

3. Funding anti-labeling campaigns in multiple states is draining Monsanto of millions of dollars. This seems to be the
majority of their marketing budget. They spent at least $8M in 2012, over $9M in 2013 in Washington State alone, and
combined for $8M to defeat just a county initiative in Maui County Hawaii this past year.

4. Flagship product causes cancer: A recent World Health Organization report concluded that the active chemical used
in Monsantos flagship product Glyphosate is probably carcinogenic to humans. This unsettling realization hasnt even
begun to sink in yet. Although some cancer-stricken farm workers are suing the big M over their illness with many more
likely to do the same.

5. National bans: An increasing number of countries are banning either GMOs or certain pesticides, or both. At least 15
European Union members move to ban GMO crops. Meanwhile some small nations like Bermuda and Colombia have
banned glyphosate.

To summarize, when people no longer want a product, market share and regulatory control mean nothing. This a long-term
problem for Monsanto that cant be fixed with cost-savings measures. That is why theyre doomed.

Related: GMO Soy makes Formaldehyde in our Gut

These 17 Countries are Saying Goodbye to GM Crops
The battle against genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) continues on, with a growing number of
countries saying goodbye to these crops for good. There are many countries who are making
moves to rid their markets of GM crops.

As of this week, these countries have initiated moves to ban GMO crop cultivation:

Austria, Croatia, Scotland, Slovenia, Italy, Germany, France, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands,
Bulgaria, Russia, Denmark, Wales, and Poland. Many of these governments are choosing an opt-out clause of a
European Commission rule that was passed in March, and it would allow for these countries to abstain from growing GMO
crops.

Regardless if these GMO crops are already authorized to be grown within the EU, this clause will allow these nations to
refuse if they wish to. Although, it's unclear how new trade deals like the TPP would put their refusal option at risk. Currently,
the only GM crop that is allowed to be grown in Europe is Monsanto's MON810 maize.

Overall, roughly 65 percent of the EU's population is saying that they want to ban the cultivation of GMO crops. Clearly, a
growing number of people are wanting to opt-out of being a part of the experiment, and when given the opportunity to
choose; many will prefer to eat food that isn't genetically-modified. At least half of the EUs governments are rejecting the
commissions drive for GMO crop approvals. They dont trust EU safety assessments and are rightly taking action to protect
their agriculture and food, says Greenpeace EU food policy director Franziska Achterberg.

Many of these countries already have anti-GMO legislation established, but more are joining the cause and they are
increasing the strict regulation and bans against these crops. All 28 nations currently within the EU require GMO labeling,
unlike the U.S. which is still battling over whether companies should be forced to label GMOs. But companies don't need to
be forced to label GMOs in order for people to be able to find out what is and isn't genetically-modified, the voluntary non-
gmo label verification project is evident to the success of alternative, voluntary methods.

Monsanto and other bio-tech corporations continue to face pressure from the public, over concerns for potential risks that
GM crops might pose to health or the environment. From lawsuits to large-scale, world-wide public demonstrations against
GM crops, and more, it's clear that people aren't going to let their concerns for these crops subside anytime soon.

Related: Agricultural Workers Diagnosed with Cancer Sue Monsanto

Special Investigative Report To Expose Genetic Armageddon

Key Factors To Overcoming Depression Without Drugs

October 13 2015 | From: Mercola

While there are instances where drugs may be warranted, antidepressants are rarely the most
appropriate answer for depression.

Its important to realize that your diet and general lifestyle are foundational factors that must be optimized if you
want to resolve your mental health issues, because your body and mind are so closely interrelated. Depression is
indeed a very serious condition; however it is not a disease. Rather, its a sign that your body and your life are
out of balance.

Mounting and compelling research demonstrates just how interconnected your mental health is with your gastrointestinal
health for example. While many think of their brain as the organ in charge of their mental health, your gut may actually play
a far more significant role. Research tells us that the composition of your gut flora not only affects your physical health, but
also has a significant impact on your brain function and mental state. Previous research has also shown that certain
probiotics can even help alleviate anxiety.
So the place to start is to return balance to your body and your life. Fortunately, research confirms that there are safe and
effective ways to address depression that do not involve unsafe (and ineffective) drugs. This includes but is not limited to the
following. For additional suggestions, please review the links listed under Related Articles:

Eat real food Dramatically decrease your consumption of processed foods, sugar (particularly fructose), and
grains. There's a great book on this subject, The Sugar Blues, written by William Dufty more
than 30 years ago, that delves into the topic of sugar and mental health in great detail. In
addition to being high in sugar and grains, processed foods also contain a variety of additives
that can affect your brain function and mental state, especially MSG, and artificial sweeteners
such as aspartame.

Optimize your gut Increase consumption of probiotic foods, such as fermented vegetables and kefir, to promote
flora healthy gut flora. Mounting evidence tells us that having a healthy gut is profoundly important
for both physical and mental health, and the latter can be severely impacted by an imbalance
of intestinal bacteria. Remember your gut is your second brain and produces more
neurotransmitters than your brain.

Get adequate Vitamin B12 deficiency can contribute to depression and affects one in four people.
vitamin B12

Optimize Vitamin D is very important for your mood. In one study, people with the lowest levels of
your vitamin D vitamin D were found to be 11 times more prone to be depressed than those who had normal
levels levels.

The best way to get vitamin D is through sensible sun exposure. SAD (Seasonal Affective
Disorder) is a type of depression that we know is related to sunshine deficiency, so it would
make sense that the perfect way to optimize your vitamin D is through sun exposure.

Optimize your To normalize your omega-3 to omega-6 ratio, take high quality omega 3 oils such as krill oil
omega-3 to and radically reduce if not completely eliminate industrial processed omega 6 oils.
omega-6 ratio
DHA, an animal based omega-3 fat, is crucial for good brain function and mental health
Dr. Stoll, a Harvard psychiatrist, was one of the early leaders in compiling the evidence
supporting the use of animal based omega-3 fats for the treatment of depression. He wrote an
excellent book that details his experience in this area called The Omega-3 Connection.

Evaluate your salt Sodium deficiency creates symptoms closely resembling those of depression. Make sure you
intake do NOT use processed salt (regular table salt), however. You'll want to use an all natural,
unprocessed salt like Himalayan salt, which contains more than 80 different micronutrients.

Exercise daily Exercise is one of the most effective strategies for preventing and overcoming depression.
Studies have shown there is a strong correlation between improved mood and aerobic
capacity. Theres a growing acceptance that the mind-body connection is very real, and that
maintaining good physical health can significantly lower your risk of developing depression in
the first place.

Get adequate You can have the best diet and exercise program possible but if you aren't sleeping well you
amounts of sleep can easily become depressed. Sleep and depression are so intimately linked that a sleep
disorder is actually part of the definition of the symptom complex that gives the label
depression.
Important Message Regarding NZ Natural Health And Supplementary Products Bill
October 11 2015 | From: NaturalMedicine

An important message from Health Freedom NZ: The Natural Health and Supplementary Products
Bill is about to undergo its third and final reading with broad support. We doubt that there is an MP
in the house that realises the harmful consequences of this Bill.

In its current form the Bill delivers the opposite of that which was outlined and agreed to by the Minister of Health
in 2009 in the Joint Industry Proposal.

The Bill is drafted with a pharmaceutical mindset, implementing a list of permitted ingredients, despite all but a tiny minority
of ingredients used in natural health products posing dangers. Current supplement regulations have proven perfectly
capable of restricting this minority, a method known as the black list approach everything not on the black list is
permitted.

The current bill proposes the opposite a white list of permitted ingredients, which renders every ingredient not on that list
forbidden. The list size is woefully inadequate by comparison to the range we currently access, and given there is no history
of harm from the current system, there is no reason to change.

This will wipe multitudes of natural health products off the shelves in NZ, unbelievably products which include essential
nutrients which the body must get through food or supplements, and which many choose as a safer and more effective
option than pharmaceutical drugs.

We will no longer be able to purchase a wide range of health products that we rely on in NZ for our health
conditions.

The continued actions of behind-the-scenes bureaucrats in pushing this agenda to both injure the natural health industry
and restrict New Zealanders from making their own healthcare choices is winding back the clock to 2007, when their last
attempt was defeated at the 11th hour.
The human body is the last bastion of sovereignty. We must make our elected leaders ensure these bureaucrats do not
infringe on our health freedom by again making it clear that this corporate agenda is not made law.

Please help us by:

Sharing this message, and our subsequent communications, to everyone you can via Email, Facebook, Twitter and any
other forms of social media you use.

Write, fax, call and visit your local MPs and opposition MPs and ask them the question WHY is the government
attempting to ban the sale of nutrients which are ESSENTIAL TO HUMAN HEALTH?

Talk to your friends, family, work colleagues and associates, tell them this information, forward them more info if you can.

This attempted infringement may affect you or your family one day. We need to again send the message that health
freedom shall prevail in New Zealand now and forevermore.

13 Chemical Threats To Remove From Your Home

October 4 2015 | From: GreenMedInfo

While people are aware of the health risk caused by outdoor air pollution, few may consider that
indoor air quality can also have a negative impact on their health. While many of these products
are commonly used in the home there are healthier options available.

The average westerner spends 90 percent of their time indoors. While people are aware of the health risk caused by
outdoor air pollution, few may consider that indoor air quality can also have a negative impact on their health.

According to the EPA levels of indoor air pollutants can be 2 to 5 times higher than outdoor pollution levels. In fact indoor air
pollutants are ranked among the top five environmental risks to public health. Since we spend so much time indoors it is
important to create a healthy, toxin free environment that is safe for everyone.

1. Non Stick Cookware - It's been 40 years since nonstick pans were introduced. Although the concept is appealing to
most cooks, the hazards just aren't worth it. Nonstick coating is made of polytetrafluoroethylene which release toxic
gasses that are linked to cancer, organ failure, reproductive damage and other health risks.
 Healthier Options: Consider using stainless steel, cast iron, or porcelain coated pans.

2. Conventional Cleaning Supplies - All purpose cleaners frequently contain toxic chemicals such as ammonia which is
a very strong irritant that can cause liver and kidney damage, or bleach which can burn your skin and eyes, and irritate your
lungs. Oven cleaners and drain cleaners can cause chemical burns and emit toxic fumes that harm your lungs. Even
products labeled "green," such as Simply Green, are not entirely natural.
 Healthier Options: Consider nontoxic cleaning products, or make your own from ingredients around the house, such as
baking soda and vinegar. Click here for recipes for homemade cleaners.

3. Air Fresheners - As time passes more negative effects are associated with these incredibly toxic products. Whether
they are solids, aerosols, automatic sprayers, diffusers, or plug ins, it doesn't matter. Petrochemically-based air fresheners
aggravate and can trigger respiratory problems, reproductive problems, birth defects, and are now being linked to breast
cancer, heart disease and diabetes.
 Healthier Options: Consider open windows, air cleaners, search for the origin of the offending odor and remove it. Click
here to learn more about air fresheners.

4. CFL Light Bulbs - People may appreciate the efficiency of these bulbs, as they use less electricity. However these
bulbs contain mercury. If you are using these bulbs, the EPA recommends these bulbs be taken to special facilities when
broken or recycled. They also offer detailed clean up instructions of broken bulbs. Learn more.

Healthier Options: Consider sticking with the "old fashion" light bulb or LEDs till something better comes along.

5. Chemical Insecticides and Herbicides - Pests and weeds may be problematic, however the health risk of using these
products may cause you to reconsider their use. RoundUp is known to create a host of physical illness. Bug sprays
commonly contain cypermethrin, a known eye, skin and respiratory irritant; it is also known to have negative effects on the
central nervous system. Click here to learn more about glyphosates.
 Healthier Options: Consider Diatomaceous Earth, or a peppermint castile soap for insects and straight vinegar as a
weed killer.

6. Chemical Fertilizers - When it rains or you water your lawn, chemical runoff enters the storm drains. This chemical
soup eventually ends up in streams, rivers and the ocean, killing wildlife and destroying water quality.
 Healthier Options: Consider an organic fertilizer and compost, or to be more eco friendly consider a xeriscape yard or
replacing your grass with a vegetable garden.

7. Flame Retardants - Flame retardants are used in cushions, mattresses, foam pillows, hair dryers, tvs, computers,
carpets, appliances, fabrics, even your telephone. The flame retardant used in mattresses, polybrominated diphenyl
ethers (PBDE) accumulates in blood, breast milk, fatty tissue and is linked to liver, thyroid and neuro development issues.
Since most people sleep on average 6-8 hours in their bed, you may consider purchasing an organic mattress.

Healthier Options: Consider replacing items when your finances allow. Click here to read more about toxins in the
home.

8. Fabric Softener and Dryer Sheets - According to the EPA and MSDS there are numerous chemicals in fabric
softeners and dryer sheets, including benzyl acetate, benzyl alcohol, ethanol, limonene, A-terpineol, ethyl acetate, camphor,
chloroform, linalool and pentane. Many of these chemicals are linked to central nervous system disorders, upper
respiratory tract infections, and various cancers, they also trigger asthmatic responses.
 Healthier Options: Consider using wool dryer balls or spiked dryer balls which fluff your clothes. Another option is to add
a cup of vinegar to the fabric softener compartment in your washer. The acidity level of vinegar neutralizes the laundry
soap, allowing more residue to wash out in the rinse cycle, clothes come out softer, and vinegar also removes any odor on
clothes. Click here to learn more about the ingredients in Fabric Softeners and Dryer Sheets.

9. Antibacterial Products - Since their widespread use we are seeing new "super-bugs" that are resistant to antibiotics.
The Center for Disease Control states concern that these anti-bacterial products may be interfering with the immune
systems of young children. There is also concern about the buildup of triclosan in our bodies and our water supplies.
 Healthier Options: Consider washing your hands more often in plain soap and water.

10. Plastic Shopping Bags - Plastic is forever. In the U.S. only 2% of plastic bags are recycled, the other 98% end up in
landfills or the ocean.

Healthier Options: Consider reusable cloth or fabric bags. Storage crates that are easily packed up in the store and
carried to your car are a great option as they are more stable than bags while driving, and have multiple uses.

11. Plastic Bottles - Most plastic bottles are made with BPA, a chemical that mimics hormones that are harmful to the
endocrine system. When exposed to heat, bottles will leach these chemicals at a faster rate into your water.
 Healthier Options: Consider stainless steel or glass bottles.

12. Scented Detergents - Almost all detergents contain fragrance, even those that are listed as unscented, usually have a
masking ingredient to cover the scent. 95% of the chemicals used in fragrances are made from petroleum products.
Many are known to cause cancer, birth defects, and damage to lungs, brain, and nerves. Fragrances are not regulated by
any government or health agency. There is no law that requires fragrance ingredients to be put on product labels.

Healthier Options: Consider washing clothes in baking soda, or look for unscented laundry detergents without a masking
fragrance.
 13. Perfumes and Scented Soaps - As with scented detergents, 95% of the chemicals used in fragrances are made from
petroleum products. Many are known to cause cancer, birth defects, and damage to lungs, brain, and nerves. Some
chemicals commonly used in fragrances, such as toluene, are listed as hazardous waste worldwide. Fragrances are not
regulated by any government or health agency. There is no law that requires fragrance ingredients to be put on product
labels. To read more about perfumes click here.

Healthier Options: There are many organic, unscented soaps available in the marketplace.

Most Scientific Research Of Western Medicine Untrustable & Fraudulent, Say Insiders
And Experts
October 3 2015 | From: ActivistPost

Fraudulent scientific research is rife throughout the world due to the power of monetary influence
wielded by Big Pharma, the giant cartel of multinational pharmaceutical corporations started over
100 years ago by the Rockefellers.
This fraudulent scientific research is now so widespread and pervasive it is become an open secret. There is a long
list of medical journal editors, doctors and professors on the outside, former Big Pharma employees and
executives on the inside, as well as government officials somewhere in between, who have stepped forward as
whistleblowers and acknowledged the fraud.

Related: Ex Pharmaceutical Sales Representative Comes Clean, Reveals Horrors Of Western Medicine

Money buys favorable research. Period. This is not really surprising, given the history of Rockefeller Western medicine and
the fact that Big Pharmas business model is based on managing disease, treating symptoms and keeping patients on
the hamster wheel, rather than actually healing them completely.

Everyone Knows How the Game Works

Whistleblower Dr. Peter Rost, former vice president of Pfizer, a giant Big Pharma company, spelled it out. In the video clip
embedded below, taken from the documentary One More Girl, he reveals that everyone knows how the game works:
 "Universities, health organizations, everybody that I have encountered are out there . begging for money. (Big
Pharma corporations) use that money to basically buy influence (Big Pharma provides) grants for various kinds
of research make sure they (scientific researchers) became beholden Everyone obviously knows this is how
things work.

They (scientific researchers) are not going to continue to get money unless theyre saying what you (i.e. Big
Pharma) want them to say. They know it, you know it, and its only maybe the public that doesnt know it."

In this way, the almost the entire medical scientific community has been compromised and has become thoroughly
untrustworthy.

Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by Medical Journal Editors and Professors

Look at what numerous key experts are saying about this epidemic of fraudulent scientific research. Dr. Richard Horton is
the current editor-in-chief of the British Lancet journal, which is respected as one of the best peer-reviewed medical journals
in the world.

He came out and stated:

"The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.

Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of
interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a
turn towards darkness."

Then look at what Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), had to
say about the pervasive fraudulent scientific research:
 "It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment
of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached
slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine."

Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis, a professor of disease prevention at Stanford University, published a study in a PLoS One paper
entitled Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.

He found that research conclusions are less likely to be true when study samples sizes are too small, when effect sizes are
even smaller, and when there are major variances in study designs, definitions, outcomes and analytical modes. He
highlighted the corrupting influence of Big Pharma and concluded that:

"There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false it is more likely for a
research claim to be false than true."

Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by other Big Pharma Whistleblowers

Fraudulent scientific research has also been exposed by former executives and employees of the Big Pharma machine. In
addition to Dr. Peter Rost, another Big Pharma whistleblower include Dr. John Virapen, author of Side Effects: Death.
Confessions of a Pharma-Insider, who admits in this book that he bribed a Swedish professor to enhance the registration of
Prozac in Sweden.

Virapen worked for 35 years in the pharmaceutical industry internationally (most notably as general manager of Eli Lilly and
Company in Sweden) where he was responsible for the marketing of several Big Pharma drugs (all of them with side
effects).
He exposes how Big Pharma invests more than $50,000 per physician per year to entice them to prescribe their products,
how more than 75% of leading scientists in the field of medicine are paid for, and how illnesses are invented by the
pharmaceutical industry to increase profit.

Another Big Pharma whistleblower is Gwen Olsen, a former Big Pharma sales rep who really knew how to push for a hard
sell. She reveals the underhanded tactics she was taught by Big Pharma executives to ensure doctors were prescribing their
drugs.

After her niece killed herself while taking antidepressants, she changed her tune and exposed the tactics. Olsen admits that
she used bribery and personal connections to sell Big Pharma meds, because she found it very difficult to sell drugs on their
own merit, that the true purpose of pharmaceutical drugs is social control, that Big Pharma buys up real cures to disease, or
sues companies not to release genuine cures.
She also reveals how drug effects or side effects were often separated to avoid full disclosure, e.g. if the effect was on the
CNS (Central Nervous System) then Big Pharma would break it down to say dizziness, fatigue, etc. so effects would look
smaller.

Sadly, patients were harmed or killed due to Olsens (and other drugs reps like her) intentional sidestepping / misinforming
physicians about a drugs effects. Olsen refers to the Revolving Door Syndrome, meaning patients who are hospitalized
continue to come back repeatedly, and each time lose more of their bodily functions.

The drugs were brain damaging, could induce violence and were slowly killing them. Meanwhile, many drugs are found to
be not more efficacious than a sugar pill (placebo).

Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by Governmental Whistleblower Too

Lastly, it is also useful to note that fraudulent scientific research has been acknowledged by governmental officials too. Dr.
William Thompson of the CDC (the US Center for Disease Control) made headlines last year when he bravely came forth to
publicly admit that he had cooked the books and fudged the data regarding vaccines.

Here is an excerpt of his public statement from August 27th, 2014:

"My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
where I have worked since 1998.

I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the
journal Pediatrics.

The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months
were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were
collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed."
Many people were harmed (or killed) by this instance of fraudulent scientific research, especially young black baby boys
under the age of 3. Consequences for Thompson or the CDC for this fraudulent scientific research? Basically none.

Obama gave him legal immunity but thats not surprising since he also singed the NDAA (claiming the right to imprison
any American indefinitely without charge or trial) and initiated his weekly Kill Lists.

Dont Fall for Appeals to Scientific or Clinical Research when Fraudulent Scientific Research is
So Rife

The lesson in all this is clear: dont believe it when you are told by anyone involved with the Western Medical Establishment
that their products are based on sound, valid, scientific, clinical evidence.

Fraudulent scientific research is so widespread you cant know anything for sure. Maybe you have to use Western
Medicine, or maybe you dont, but dont go in blindly believing everything youre told.

Related: Psychiatric Drugs Kill 500,000+ Western Adults Annually, Few Positive Benefits Leading Scientist

Chemical Exposure Linked To Rising Diabetes, Obesity Risk

October 2 2015 | From: ScienceDaily

Emerging evidence ties endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure to two of the biggest public
health threats facing society - diabetes and obesity, according to the executive summary of an
upcoming Scientific Statement issued today by the Endocrine Society.

Known EDCs include bisphenol A (BPA) found in food can linings and cash register receipts, phthalates found in
plastics and cosmetics, flame retardants and pesticides. The chemicals are so common that nearly every person on
Earth has been exposed to one or more.
Related: Why Touching Receipts Can Harm Your Health

The statement's release comes as Society experts are addressing a global meeting, the International Conference on
Chemicals Management (ICCM4), in Geneva, Switzerland, on the importance of using scientific approaches to limit health
risks of EDC exposure.

The statement builds upon the Society's groundbreaking 2009 report, which examined the state of scientific evidence on
endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and the risks posed to human health. In the ensuing years, additional research has
found that exposure is associated with increased risk of developing diabetes and obesity.

Mounting evidence also indicates EDC exposure is connected to infertility, hormone-related cancers, neurological issues
and other disorders.

EDCs contribute to health problems by mimicking, blocking or otherwise interfering with the body's natural hormones. By
hijacking the body's chemical messengers, EDCs can alter the way cells develop and grow.

Known EDCs include bisphenol A (BPA) found in food can linings and cash register receipts, phthalates found in plastics
and cosmetics, flame retardants and pesticides. The chemicals are so common that nearly every person on Earth has been
exposed to one or more.

An economic analysis published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism in March estimated that EDC
exposure likely costs the European Union 157 billion ($209 billion) a year in actual health care expenses and lost earning
potential.

"The evidence is more definitive than ever before - EDCs disrupt hormones in a manner that harms human
health," said Andrea C. Gore, Professor and Vacek Chair of Pharmacology at the University of Texas at Austin and
chair of the task force that developed the statement.

"Hundreds of studies are pointing to the same conclusion, whether they are long-term epidemiological studies in
human, basic research in animals and cells, or research into groups of people with known occupational exposure
to specific chemicals."

The threat is particularly great when unborn children are exposed to EDCs. Animal studies found that exposure to even tiny
amounts of EDCs during the prenatal period can trigger obesity later in life.

Similarly, animal studies found that some EDCs directly target beta and alpha cells in the pancreas, fat cells, and liver cells.
This can lead to insulin resistance and an overabundance of the hormone insulin in the body -- risk factors for Type 2
diabetes.

Epidemiological studies of EDC exposure in humans also point to an association with obesity and diabetes, although the
research design did not allow scientists to determine causality.

The research offers insights into factors driving the rising rates of obesity and diabetes. About 35 percent of American adults
are obese, and more than 29 million Americans have diabetes, according to the Society's Endocrine Facts and Figures
report.

The Scientific Statement also examines evidence linking EDCs to reproductive health problems, hormone-related cancers
such as breast and ovarian cancer, prostate conditions, thyroid disorders and neurodevelopmental issues. Although many of
these conditions were linked to EDCs by earlier research, the number of corroborating studies continues to mount.

"It is clear we need to take action to minimize further exposure," Gore said.

"With more chemicals being introduced into the marketplace all the time, better safety testing is needed to identify
new EDCs and ensure they are kept out of household goods."

In the statement, the Society calls for:

Additional research to more directly infer cause-and-effect relationships between EDC exposure and health conditions.

Regulation to ensure chemicals are tested for endocrine activity, including at low doses, prior to being permitted for use.

Calling upon "green chemists" and other industrial partners to create products that test for and eliminate potential EDCs.

Education for the public and policymakers on ways to keep EDCs out of food, water and the air, as well as ways to protect
unborn children from exposure.
Click on the image above for further detail

The statement also addresses the need to recognize EDCs as an international problem. Society members are currently
meeting in Geneva for the fourth session of the International Conference on Chemicals Management (ICCM4).

Attending members, including Jean-Pierre Bourguignon, MD, PhD, Professor of Pediatrics at the University of Lige in
Belgium, emphasize key principles of endocrinology that are confirmed by recent research need to be taken into account
when developing policies for identifying and regulating endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

"Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals during early development can have long-lasting, even permanent
consequences," said Bourguignon.

"The science is clear and it's time for policymakers to take this wealth of evidence into account as they develop
legislation."

Doctors List 50 Reasons Why You Must Stop Drinking Fluoridated Water Now
September 30 2015 | From: WakingTimes

Public water fluoridation continues to be one of the most controversial health topics in the United
States and in other parts of the world.
The American Dental Association (ADA) has been, and continues to be, one of the biggest proponents of water
fluoridation, although even the government has recently admitted that fluoride may not actually be helping teeth.

Related: New Evidence of Harm from Fluoridation

More scientific studies pointout that fluoride is actually very dangerous, yet this practice continues in many countries.

"In Europe, only Ireland (73%), Poland (1%), Serbia (3%), Spain (11%), and the U.K. (11%) fluoridate any of their
water. Most developed countries, including Japan and 97% of the western European population, do not consume
fluoridated water.

In the U.S., about 70% of public water supplies are fluoridated. This equates to approximately 185 million people,
which is over half the number of people drinking artificially fluoridated water worldwide. (Source)

The case against water fluoridation continues to grow and continues to be supported by an increasing body of solid scientific
research.

The information in the following list was originally compiled and presented by Paul Connett, PhD, at the Irish Fluoridation
Forum in October 2000. Since then, these arguments have been updated with the assistance of James Beck, MD, PhD,
Michael Connett, JD, Hardy Limeback, DDS, PhD, David McRae and Spedding Micklem, and D.Phil.

Here are their 50 top reasons why you must stop drinking fluoridated water immediately:

1. Fluoride is the only chemical added to water for the purpose of medical treatment. All other chemicals are added
to improve the waters safety or quality.

2. Fluoridation is unethical because it is forced onto the public without their consent. Informed consent is standard
practice for all other medication.
 3. The dose of the amount of fluoride consumed is impossible to control if administered through the public water
system.

4. Fluoridated water is administered equally to everyone, without regard to age, health or vulnerability.

5. Fluoride is provided in many other sources beside water, including food, salt, dental products, pesticide residues on
food, etc.

6. Fluoride is not an essential nutrient that is required by any of the bodys biological processes.

7. Fluoride levels in a nursing mothers milk are naturally very low, thus bottle-fed babies consuming formula mixed with
fluoridated water may be consuming harmful levels.

8. The kidneys of an adult are only able to excrete 50-60% of fluoride ingested each day, resulting in accumulation in the
body and bones.

9. No health agency in countries that fluoridate water is monitoring the side effects or results of fluoride exposure.

10. There have been no randomized controlled trials to demonstrate the safety or effectiveness to water fluoridation.

11. Acknowledged by the U.S. Center for Disease Control, the benefit of fluoride is mainly topical, not systemic.

12. Industrialized countries that have rejected water fluoridation have experienced the same decline in childhood dental
decay. See graph.

13. The difference between tooth decay among children in fluoridated and non-fluoridated communities in the US
is miniscule. See survey.
 14. A study funded by the U.S. National Institute of Health found no significant relationship between tooth decay and
fluoride intake in children. See study.

15. Tooth decay continues to be high in low-income communities that have had fluoridated water for years.

16. There is no noticeable rise in tooth decay in communities where fluoridation is stopped.

17. The decline in tooth decay started before water fluoridation was introduced. See graph.

18. The studies used to justify water fluoridation have been criticized as especially rich in fallacies, improper design,
invalid use of statistical methods, omissions of contrary data, and just plain muddleheadedness and hebetude. ~ Dr. Hubert
Arnold, Statistician from the University of California at Davis

19. Water fluoridation programs have massively failed to achieve their key objective of lowering dental fluorosis to 10% in
children. As of 2014, 41% of American adolescents had dental fluorosis. See graph.

20. Infants consuming baby formula made with fluoridated water have the highest exposure to fluoride, which has been
found to be a major risk factor in developing dental fluorosis later in life.
 21. Dental fluorosis may be an indicator of wider systemic damage.

22. Evidence exists that fluoride may damage the brain, interfere with brain functions, or lead to neurotoxicity.

23. Multiple studies have reported an association between fluoride exposure and reduced IQ.

24. Other studies have reported an association between fluoride exposure and non-IQ neurotoxic effects.

25. Studies have shown that fluoride accumulates and affects the human pineal gland. See studies.

26. Fluoride exposure affects thyroid function.

27. Fluoride causes arthritic symptoms due to a fluoride-induced bone and joint disease called skeletal fluorosis.

28. Fluoride damages bones.

29. Fluoride may result in an increase in bone fractures, particularly in the hips, in the elderly. Some studies suggest that
even low-level exposure may have a detrimental effect on cortical bone density.

30. People with kidney disease are prone to higher accumulation of fluoride in their bones and blood, making them more
vulnerable to bone damage.
 31. Fluoride may be one of the causes of osteosarcoma (bone cancer).

32. Proponents of fluoridation have been unable to refute the Bassin-Oteosarcoma study (2006) that showed an increased
risk of getting osteosarcoma in men that drank fluoridated water during mid-childhood.

33. Numerous studies have shown that fluoride administered to animals damages the male reproductive system, and other
epidemiological studies have shown increased rates of infertility among men living in high-fluoride areas.

34. Individuals that are highly sensitive to low levels of fluoride can experience symptoms such as fatigue, headaches,
rashes and gastro-intestinal problems.

35. Some subsets of the population, including infants, the elderly, those with impaired kidney function (see #30), those with
diabetes, and those suffering from malnutrition, are more vulnerable to fluorides toxicity.

36. There is no margin of safety for the health effects of fluoridation.

37. Low-income families have no financial support to get alternative water supplies or to treat dental fluorosis, even though
they are the ones being targeted by new fluoridation programs.

38. Black and Hispanic children are more vulnerable to fluorides toxicity resulting in significantly higher rates of
dental fluorosis, while, once again, their families are less able to avoid drinking fluoridated water.

39. Minorities and low-income families are not being warned about their vulnerabilities to fluoride.

40. Highest rates of tooth decay today can be found in low-income areas that have fluoridated water.

41. The chemicals used to fluoridate water are often sourced from wet scrubbing systems of the phosphate fertilizer
industry. They are classified as hazardous waste and are not pharmaceutical grade.

42. There is a lack of comprehensive testing on the silicon fluorides.

43. Studies have found an association between the use of fluorosilicic acid to fluoridate water and an increased lead
uptake into childrens blood.

44. Using fluoridating agents, in combination with chlorinating agents, may lead to an increase in leaching of lead from
pipes and brass fittings used in water systems.

45. The status quo regarding fluoride has been followed for too long, without conducting key health studies. Many
questions raised about fluoride are unsettled, and the scientific community has much less information than it should.

Side effects of fluoridation:

 46. Many endorsements by organizations such as the US Public Health Service were made before any significant health
studies were conducted; they were not based on any type of scientific evidence.

47. Reports used to provide necessary re-endorsements of the fluoridation practice are delivered by hand-picked panels of
well-known medical and dental researchers who actively campaigned on behalf of fluoridation. (Fluoride Wars, Freeze and
Lehr)

48. Many scientists oppose fluoridation. As of January 2012, over 4,000 professionals have signed a statement calling
for an end to water fluoridation worldwide.

49. The political pro-fluoridation stance has evolved into a dogmatic, authoritarian, essentially antiscientific
posture, one that discourages open debate of scientific issues. ~ Dr. Edward Groth, Senior Scientist at Consumers
Union
 50. Medical professionals opposed to fluoridation are apprehensive about speaking out in public in fear of
recriminations, censorship and intimidation. Proponents use these tactics because fluoridation practice is not based on
secure scientific and ethical grounds.

For a full listing of research and sources cited by Dr. Paul Connett in his presentation, and further explanation of these 50
argents against water fluoridation, can be found here.

Further arguments against water fluoridation can be viewed here.

WiFi Backlash Trend Accelerating + Founder Of PayPal And Tesla Motors Wants To
Wirelessly-Irradiate You From Space
September 28 2015 | From: EMFanalysis / ExtremeTech

Cafe owners in Sydney are realizing that Free WiFi comes at a cost. As The Syndey Morning
Herald reports, cafes are starting to limit or ban WiFi so that people will actually have real
interactions. Its economic too allowing one customer to purchase a $3 coffee and take up a table
for five for hours on end is simply not good business practice.

As the health effects of microwave radiation come into the mainstream, this trend will only accelerate. WiFi will
become just like smoking once a ubiquitous presence in all cafes/restaurants and now something that is socially
unacceptable.

You can read the full article here:

"The love affair between coffee shops and laptop-wielding customers may be dying out as coffee shop owners
revolt against Sydneysiders demand to be wired up.

Wi-Fi backlash is a trend accelerating among coffee shops, bars and restaurants, where a failure to see the
benefits of Wi-Fi-induced turnover is encouraging many owners to restrict Wi-Fi or ban it.
The cafe of the future wont have WiFi. Hemingways Manly manager Theo Gibson is a trendsetter.

SpaceX asks FCC to approve its Satellite Internet Plans

Satellite Internet service is usually seen as a last resort - something you get when there is literally no other
option. SpaceX might be on track to change that. Elon Musks space firm has filed with the Federal
Communications Commission seeking permission to deploy a network of satellites in orbit that would beam
wireless Internet access to Earth from space. This is the first step in making the plan - first revealed in January - a
reality.

Even today there are large swaths of the US and other developed nations that have little or no connectivity. Its a
matter of return on investment for the Internet service providers. If there are only a few potential customers in an
area, its not worth the investment to run high-speed Internet infrastructure all the way out there. That leaves those
people with limited options like dial-up and traditional satellite Internet.

SpaceXs plan is to deploy a network of 4,000 small and cheap geosynchronous satellites to beam signals down to Earth.
This approach would be easier to maintain than satellite Internet managed by Dish and DirecTV, which rely on just a few
larger (and more expensive) satellites.

If one of SpaceXs satellites fails, theres a huge amount of redundancy and its cheap to replace. It certainly helps that
SpaceX has its own rockets that can be used to launch new satellites too.

These SpaceX satellites would be set up in a low-Earth orbit, allowing them to reach more areas and hand off connections
to improve reliability and speed. One of the most significant issues with satellite Internet is latency - more than half a second
for most services.

Having satellites in a lower orbit with more interconnectedness will certainly help with that, but its not clear SpaceXs system
would be good enough for real-time applications.
Thanks Elon, for asking the world if they are fine with being irradiated by your dirty tech from space

This isnt going to happen overnight, and its definitely not going to be cheap. The FCC filing seeks permission to begin a
test deployment of a few satellites, which can be used to assess the antenna technology and see if the plan is even
feasible.

Google and Fidelity have invested $1 billion in SpaceX, part of which is earmarked for the satellite Internet project. SpaceX
estimates the project could cost as much as $10 billion when all is said and done.

Despite the high cost, Musk sees this as a good long-term source of revenue to support future spaceflight. Google is also
toying with the idea of delivering Internet access to rural areas with its Project Loon balloons. For Google its all a matter of
getting more people on the Internet to look at ads, but for SpaceX, its a stepping stone to Mars.

Hospital Fires Leading Cancer Surgeon For Telling The Truth About Medical
Establishment
September 24 2015 | From: NaturalNews

A vicious hate campaign has been waged against an internationally renowned cancer surgeon
named Joseph Meirion Thomas. At first, his superiors in the medical system tried to silence him,
but now they've resorted to firing him.
The courageous 69-year-old surgeon has been fired from the Royal Marsden Hospital in London because he started
speaking the truth about the faults of the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK while questioning the quality of
care that general practitioners provide.

The more he told the truth, the more backlash he received from the medical establishment. Hospital chiefs have not only
called Thomas's criticisms a "misrepresentation of facts," but they have resorted to name calling. One attack came from
Daniel Sommer, a doctor at London's Charing Cross. He said that Dr. Thomas should "shut the f*** up!" and added that he
is nothing more than a "clueless xenophobe who is completely out of touch with reality."

Prideful, ego-driven medical establishment not willing to admit its faults

The medical establishment, like any other organized power structure, does not willingly admit its faults. Driven by ego,
people in allegiance to the medical establishment refuse to look weak or wrong in how they systematically go about their
jobs. This ego keeps the establishment from improving its practice and care. This pride stops the medical field from
progressing into a fully integrative, diverse, open-minded, solution-based system. The status quo remains, bound by
stubbornness.
This limits the power of healing in the profession. This unwillingness to admit shortcomings propels the establishment to
come out against anyone who speaks the truth about the faults in the system.

The concerted attacks against Joseph Meirion Thomas are a perfect example of this. Whistleblowers are often hunted down
and discredited like witches, but these are the people who could inspire great improvements in society if only the power
structures were humble and listened to whistleblowers' concerns, skepticism and insights.

Whistleblower explains how general practitioners lack time to care for patients

Dr. Thomas wrote four comment pieces for the Daily Mail. Two of the pieces focused on the impact of health tourism in the
UK. His calm expose pointed out how foreigners were abusing the NHS, making the system more prone to economic
collapse. In the third piece, he discussed the burden female doctors were putting on the NHS after going through extensive
training and then leaving the field to have families.

The more he addressed problems in the NHS, the more he ran into opposition. His fourth piece drew the most ire. In that
piece, Thomas questioned Britain's modern general practitioner system and how doctors have become increasingly
unavailable to patients. Thomas said that general practitioners hardly provide "remotely personal" service. He told the truth:
doctors aren't willing to work out of hours or see patients more than once.
His employer, the Royal Marsden Hospital in London, said his opinion pieces have put the institution into "disrepute." A
number of practitioners lashed back at Thomas, calling him "ignorant, unprofessional and misinformed". Bosses harassed
and bullied him and said that general practitioners would stop referring their patients to him if he didn't stop.

The hospital's chief executive went to great lengths to silence Thomas. He tried to force the 69-year-old surgeon into signing
a document pledging obedience to the hospital and promising that he would not write any more opinion articles unless he
had permission. Thomas refused and was forced out of the hospital.

Instead of listening to people like Dr. Thomas and working on ways to improve the medical system, the stubborn medical
establishment banishes people like him, forsaking positive change. In the meantime, the general practitioner system will
continue to be economically unsustainable with doctor-per-patient time dwindling.

The "Institutional Corruption" Of Psychiatry: A Conversation With Authors Of

''Psychiatry Under The Influence''
September 21 2015 | From: TruthOut

What does psychiatry have in common with the US Congress? "Institutional corruption,"
concludes Psychiatry Under the Influence (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), which investigates how drug
company money and psychiatry's own guild interests have corrupted psychiatry during the past 35
years.
Co-authored by investigative reporter Robert Whitaker and psychologist Lisa Cosgrove, the foreword
for Psychiatry Under the Influence is written by Harvard Law School professor Lawrence Lessig, who helped create
Harvard's Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics' lab on institutional corruption (where both Whitaker and Cosgrove
served as fellows).

Whitaker and Cosgrove - as does Lessig - distinguish between "individual" versus "institutional" corruption, between a "bad
apple" versus a "bad barrel." In individual corruption, a politician takes an illegal bribe. But in institutional corruption, nothing
illegal may be occurring when, for example, politicians raise campaign money via special interest political action committees
(PACS).

And just as elected officials develop dependency on special interests and become beholden to these funders instead of the
citizenry, Whitaker and Cosgrove conclude, the same thing has occurred in psychiatry, which has had its social mission
subverted by drug companies as well as by the psychiatry guild's self-preservation and expansionism needs.

Both authors responded to questions that I had about their recently published book.

Bruce Levine: The corruption of psychiatry by pharmaceutical companies has been widely known since the 2008
Congressional investigation of psychiatry, reported by the mainstream media including The New York Times; and
this corruption has been bemoaned by major figures in medicine such as Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of
The New England Journal of Medicine.

But what you are saying is that there is a second corrupting "economy of influence" that is not as well recognized
by the public but which is even more problematic. Can you speak about that?

Robert Whitaker: There has indeed been much public attention on the corrupting influence of pharmaceutical money on
American psychiatry. But the public's focus on pharmaceutical companies as the main problem distracts attention from the
larger corrupting influence, and that is psychiatry's own guild interests.

In 1980, when the APA [American Psychiatric Association] published the third edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
[DSM III], it adopted a "medical model" for diagnosing and treating mental disorders.
The APA then launched a public relations effort to sell this new model to the public, which meant informing the public that
psychiatric disorders are real "diseases" of the brain; that they are under-recognized and undertreated; and that psychiatric
drugs are very effective - and disease-specific-treatments - for these disorders. The APA has relentlessly promoted that
message to the public for 35 years.

This is a narrative that has served the psychiatry guild's interests well. Pharma money flowed to the APA and to academic
psychiatrists and their medical schools; psychiatry's influence in society dramatically increased; and psychiatry was able to
present itself, to the public and to itself, as a medical specialty that treated diseases of the brain. Money, power, a boost in
psychiatry's public image - that is a powerful mix of rewards from a narrative.

The problem is that mainstream psychiatric research was not showing it to be true. Research failed to validate the disorders
in psychiatry's DSM; the chemical imbalance hypothesis fell apart long ago; and clinical studies of the drugs, including
studies funded by the NIMH [National Institute of Mental Health], have shown that their short-term efficacy is of a very
modest sort and that they may do more harm than good over the long-term.

But the APA and academic psychiatry haven't told the public that story of science, and that is because it runs counter to their
guild interests. And, of course, the public relies on the medical specialty - as opposed to pharmaceutical companies - to be a
reliable provider of information, which is why this corruption due to guild interests is so problematic.
Lisa Cosgrove: I would add to what Bob said that there was a clear scientific impulse to the APA's creation of DSM III. As
we wrote in our book, the APA set out to redo its diagnostic manual in order to address issues of reliability. Spitzer, the chair
of the DSM III task force, did have the public's interest at heart. He wanted to have a more scientific, empirically based
taxonomy.It also should be noted, as part of this discussion, that no medical specialty or professional organization is
immune to guild interests.

Psychiatry Under the Influence attempts to understand psychiatry's denial and refusal to accept blame for its
failures. So, for example, Ronald Pies, editor-in-chief of Psychiatric Times, refuses to blame psychiatry for the
dissemination of the disproven chemical imbalance theory of mental illness (which fueled the dramatic rise of
antidepressant use).

Pies claims that the chemical imbalance theory "was always a kind of urban legend - never seriously propounded
by well-informed psychiatrists," and he blames Americans' widespread belief in it on drug companies. You attribute
much of psychiatry's denial and evasion of responsibility to "cognitive dissonance theory" - can you speak about
this?

Robert Whitaker: Again, this is part of the "institutional corruption" lens we were using to study the institution of psychiatry
and its behavior. The assumption is that individuals within the institution can't see that their behavior has been corrupted by
"economies of influence."

And so, when those outside the institution begin pointing out the corruption in it, those within it may construct a narrative that
protects their self-image. In this case, psychiatrists need to protect their image as honest researchers and as physicians
who put the interests of their patients first. Cognitive dissonance theory reveals that there are a myriad of ways that people
protect themselves in this manner.

We can see that cognitive dissonance quite clearly in Ronald Pies' claim that the "chemical imbalance" theory was always a
kind of urban legend. The fact that psychiatrists, for a long period of time, regularly told patients that the drugs fix chemical
imbalances in the brain represented a fundamental betrayal of those patients.

So once the chemical imbalance story fell apart publicly, what does Pies do? Does he admit, even in his own mind, that
psychiatrists told this false story to patients for decades? No, he says well-informed psychiatrists never said it and places
the blame on the pharmaceutical companies for telling that false story.

Pies makes this argument even though it is easy to document that the leaders of the APA often told this chemical imbalance
story to the public, and that, even today, many prominent psychiatrists serve on advisory boards of patient advocacy groups
that continue to tell it to the public.

Lisa Cosgrove: One of my favorite quotes is by Carol Tavris: "Mistakes were made, but not by me." None of us are immune
to cognitive dissonance. It is part of the human condition to have implicit biases and remain blissfully ignorant of them.

You talk about the "social injury" caused by psychiatry's institutional corruption, and I sense that you both are
especially troubled by the injury incurred by young people, especially foster kids. Can you elaborate?

Robert Whitaker: This is one of the reasons that the institutional corruption framework can prove so useful. It requires an
examination of the social injury resulting from the corruption, and when you do that in this case, you see how vast it is. We,
as a society, have organized ourselves - both individually and as a society - around a false narrative of science. And what
has been the resulting social injury?
It has led to the pathologizing of millions of children, which is doing extraordinary harm; it has given us an impoverished
philosophy of being, with its ever-narrowing boundaries of what is deemed normal; and it prevents us, as a society, from
trying to create a more just society, since problems are located within the brain of the individual, rather than in poverty, poor
schools and so forth. Society gets a free ride with this model.

The injury done to children in foster care illuminates, with great clarity, this larger societal injury. ... The children may be
neglected, abused and so forth - they in essence drew a short straw in the lottery of life. But what do we do in the post DSM
III era? We don't ask what happened to these children and try to create nurturing environments for them. Instead, we
regularly diagnose them with a psychiatric disorder and medicate them.

Of course the drugs - and this is particularly true of the antipsychotics - make it more difficult for the child to think and to
experience emotion.

And thus the social injury from this corruption: We as a society think we are providing medication to fix a disease
the child has, while the child is now burdened with the stigma of a diagnosis and the burden of the medications.

Lisa Cosgrove: In order to fully address this social injury in marginalized populations, such as foster care children, we also
need to understand that the way our health-care system is structured deincentivizes prescribing providers from taking a
more contextual approach. If you talk to clinicians on the ground, that is what they want to do, but they are incentivized to
prescribe.

You describe institutional corruption as a problem of "good people" doing "bad things" because of a corrupted
environment. I personally know a young politician who genuinely sought to do public good but quickly grasped the
reality that candidates with the most money win elections, and he was compelled to either focus on raising money
or not run at all.

Is psychiatry really in that same situation? Psychiatry is not facing a big-spending opponent, and it has had every
opportunity as the "incumbent" to gain public confidence by simply being honest and effective. And individual
psychiatrists can reject drug company incentives and still make a good living, at least compared to most
Americans - and some dissident psychiatrists do reject those incentives. Are you being too easy on psychiatry?
Robert Whitaker: Perhaps, but that too is part of the of the institutional corruption framework: Any path to reform must start
with a generosity of spirit, which avoids condemnation of individuals - regardless of whether some individuals within the
institution deserve such condemnation - and instead focuses on how "economies of influence" have created an environment
where "corrupt" behavior has become normalized and unrecognized.

The point is that the framework seeks "understanding" rather than "condemnation," with the thought that such understanding
will have two effects. First, in the absence of condemnation, leaders in the institution may be better able to see how the
economies of influence have corrupted their behavior. Second, it will focus public attention on how to neutralize the
economies of influence as a solution to the corruption, as opposed to stirring public anger toward individuals within the
institution.

Lisa Cosgrove: I think this question points to a problem with the societal discussion we have been having. To me, this
question of whether we were too easy on psychiatry is close to asking, are you "anti-psychiatry" or "pro-psychiatry?" And I
think when we pose questions or answers as dichotomies, we undermine the potential for solutions.

I am not anti-psychiatry; I am not pro-psychiatry. I hope that our book provides data that enables people to think critically
about these issues. In my work as a researcher, I try to do empirical work that fosters such critical thinking, and helps people
make more informed decisions about their mental health issues.

In your subsection on "Psychiatry's Self-Image," you had quotes from the 12 past American Psychiatric
Association presidents who address psychiatry's low professional self-esteem, upset that psychiatrists are not
seen as real doctors and suffer demeaning jokes in medical school - and exalting APA members to "change the
way the world thinks of psychiatry and the way we think of ourselves as psychiatrists" (Jeffrey Lieberman, APA
president through 2014). In addition to trying to pump up psychiatrists' self-esteem, a major role of the APA
president is apparently to attack psychiatry's critics - as Lieberman recently called you, Bob, "a menace to
society." Is there any hope of reforming American psychiatry?

Robert Whitaker: This is the bottom-line question, and unfortunately, when you apply this institutional framework to
psychiatry, the answer becomes clear: American psychiatry, as an institution, is not going to reform itself. The guild
influence is too strong; so too the cognitive dissonance.

Lieberman is an example of this: He called me a "menace to society," but what had I done? I had written and spoken about
research that reported better long-term outcomes for unmedicated psychiatric patients, compared to those taking
medication. But Lieberman can't acknowledge that this could be the case, and so he needs to kill the messenger to protect
his profession and to protect his own beliefs.

That is precisely why psychiatry can't be expected to reform itself. The field, as a whole, is too invested in a narrative born of
guild interests, and it has shown little sign of the introspection, as an institution, that could lead it to seriously reform its
ways.

So what is a possible solution? It must come from an informed public that will see the need to strip psychiatry of its authority
over this domain of our lives and instead demand that the authority be vested in a multidisciplinary group of professionals,
philosophers and "users" of psychiatric care.

Psychiatry could be a part of this multidisciplinary group, but not the ruler of it. But can this really happen? I am rather
pessimistic, and yet, at the same time, the public is increasingly becoming aware that our society has organized itself
around a false narrative and that this is doing great harm, and so perhaps this will lead to society putting its trust in a more
diverse, multidisciplinary group. I hope so, because this is a case of institutional corruption that is doing great harm to our
society.

Lisa Cosgrove: What we were trying to highlight in our book is the harm that can be done when norms and incentive
structures develop that undermine reflexivity and critical thinking. Although it is easy to vilify a few people, to effect real
change, members of that organization will need to be willing to address the ways in which their guild interests took
precedence over their public health mission.

In addition, the framework of institutional corruptions gives us tools to identify solutions and to think big. If we want to effect
change, we need to change our current health-care system. We have a society that thinks there is a pill for every ill and a
system that incentivizes the prescribing of pills. So there needs to be a paradigm shift, as well as public policy initiatives,
that will foster an appreciation of the socio-political grounding of emotional distress.

Before His Death, Father Of ADHD Admitted It Was A Fictitious Disease

September 13 2015 | From: NatrualNews

If you or someone you know has a child that has been diagnosed with attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), chances are the child is actually just fine
At least this is what the "father" of ADHD, Leon Eisenberg, would presumably say if he were still alive. On his death
bed, this psychiatrist and autism pioneer admitted that ADHD is essentially a "fictitious disease," which means that
millions of young children today are being needlessly prescribed severe mind-altering drugs that will set them up
for a life of drug addiction and failure.

As explained by The Sons of Liberty host Bradlee Dean, who also writes for The D.C. Clothesline, ADHD was merely a
theory developed by Eisenberg. It was never actually proven to exist as a verifiable disease, despite the fact that Eisenberg
and many others profited handsomely from its widespread diagnosis.

And modern psychiatry continues to profit as well, helping also to fill the coffers of the pharmaceutical industry by getting
children addicted early to dangerous psychostimulant drugs like Ritalin (methylphenidate) and Adderall (amphetamine,
dextroamphetamine mixed salts).

"ADHD is fraud intended to justify starting children on a life of drug addiction," said Dr. Edward C. Hamlyn, a
founding member of the Royal College of General Practitioners, back in 1998 about the phony condition.

Adding to this sentiment, psychiatrists Peter Breggin and Sami Timimi, both of whom oppose pathologizing the symptoms
of ADHD, say that ADHD is more of a social construct than it is an objective "disorder."

Psychiatric profession all about generating obscene profits for Big Pharma

The purpose all along for pathologizing ADHD symptoms, of course, was to generate more profits for the drug
industry.

According to the citizen watchdog group Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHRI), roughly 20 million
American children today are taking dangerous, but expensive, psychiatric drugs for made-up behavioral conditions like
ADHD.
And another one million or so children have been blatantly and admittedly misdiagnosed with phony behavioral conditions
for which psychiatric medications are being prescribed.

"Remember, there are two ways drug companies can make money: Invent new drugs, and invent new
diseasesalready invented drugs can treat," writes Dr. Jay Parkinson, M.D., M.P.H., about the fake disease-creation
industry.

"In the past decade or so, Big Pharma has created no less than 10 new novel drugs per year," he adds, noting that
many of the people who have been told they suffer from ADHD actually suffer from "the consequence of bad
design," meaning a conventional social and educational system that is unable and unwilling to recognize unique
individuality.

This is definitely true for Jacob Barnett, the 14-year-old autistic genius whose mother was told that her son would probably
never read or write. Today, Jacob is already working on his Master's Degree in quantum physics while most of his peers are
still in junior high. He is also currently developing his own original theory in astrophysics, according to recent reports.

"The psychiatric / pharmaceutical industry spends billions of dollars a year to convince the public, legislators and
the press that psychiatric disorders such as Bi-Polar Disorder, Depression, Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD/ADHD),
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, etc. are medical diseases on par with verifiable medical conditions such as
cancer, diabetes and heart disease," explains CCHRI. "Yet unlike real medical disease, there are no scientific tests
to verify the medical existence of any psychiatric disorder."

Why Touching Receipts Can Harm Your Health

September 12 2015 | From: GreenMedInfo

Keeping your receipts may make good financial sense, but it can seriously harm your health

If you are like me, you hesitate at the checkout counter whenever the cashier asks you "would you like your
receipt"? If your inner accountant is alive and well, you will find yourself wanting to keep it, which means touch it.

But on the other hand, if you are already aware of the information in this article, the idea of handling a bisphenol A saturated
thermal printer receipt without gloves makes as much sense as handling gasoline or paint thinner without protection.

And if you are really "neurotic" like me, you may find yourself thinking about the health of the cashier, who undoubtedly has
been handling receipts all shift long, and will continue to be exposed -- often unwittingly -- to a significant dose of bisphenol
A throughout the course of their employment. This is why I cringe doubly when I refuse a receipt, because I realize that the
cashier has no idea why I would do so, nor that they have suffered a harmful chemical exposure in the very act of offering
the receipt to me.

Bisphenol A is also used in a lot of food packaging and has caused a lot of concern regarind human health

All this might sound overly cautious if it had not already been proven that exposure to thermal printer receipts is one of the
primary routes through which our bodies become contaminated with the toxic synthetic chemical known as bisphenol A
(BPA), a potent endocrine disruptor, carcinogen, and neurotoxic and cardiotoxic chemical, linked to over 50 adverse
health effects. BPA is also found in airline tickets, gas and ATM receipts, and paper currency absorbs the BPA contained
within these receipts, making daily exposure even more likely.

Related: High levels of bisphenol A in paper currencies from several countries, and implications for dermal
exposure
There are other important variables that play into how much of this chemical we absorb. For instance, bisphenol absorption
is exponentially enhanced with the use of mass market skin care products, which are themselves mainly comprised
of petrochemically-derived ingredients whose toxicities are also a major concern.

For instance, back in 2014, a highly concerning study published in PLoS titled, "Holding thermal receipt paper and eating
food after using hand sanitizer results in high serum bioactive and urine total levels of bisphenol A (BPA)," found
that hand sanitizers, as well as other skin care products, contain mixtures of chemicals that can increase the absorption of
fat-soluble compounds such as BPA by as much as 100 fold.
There is also the disturbing fact that 93% of healthy infants aged 3-15 months were found to be contaminated with BPA
without any known cause of environmental exposure, revealing how truly widespread contamination is, regardless of direct
exposure to thermal printer receipts.

Now a new study published in Environmental Health Perspectives titled, "Bisphenol A, Bisphenol S, and 4-
Hydroxyphenyl 4-Isoprooxyphenylsulfone (BPSIP) in Urine and Blood of Cashiers", reveals that the problem of
chemical exposure through paper receipts is not simply associated with bisphenol A exposure, but with other bisphenol
analogs as well. As we have seen with the recent increase in products explicitly labeled as "bisphenol A free", the
industries that have become reliant on the chemical are now substituting bisphenol S (and perhaps other bisphenols) in
these products, despite the fact that it possesses similar toxicity. This is all the more disturbing considering recent research
revealing that bisphenol S may be 100x more potent an endocrine disruptor than bisphenol A.

The chemical class known as bisphenols actually includes over a dozen different forms, including bisphenols A, B, C, F, P.
The new study found that the printer receipts contained between 1-2% BPA, BPS, or BPSIP (a bisphenol S variation), by
weight.
The blood and urine samples of cashiers were evaluated for bisphenol levels in post-shift samples compared with pre-shift
samples, finding that the receipts contained between 1-2% BPA, PBS, or BPSIP, by weight, and that their levels of BPS
were significantly higher than non-cashiers. Based on the cashier's toxicological profile, the study concluded, "Thermal
receipt paper is a potential source of occupational exposure to BPA, BPS, and BPSIP."

So, what do you do if you shouldn't touch or keep your receipts?

One easy 'no touch' way to track receipts is to take a photo of it and email it to yourself or a special email account you
create to account for them. You could also use one of many phone apps that help you photo and track your receipts. Here is
an article on IGeeksBlog.com on the "Best iPhone Receipt Tracking Apps: Never Miss An Expense Again."

Also, consider that there is research on natural ways to mitigate bisphenol toxicity. We have a list of 13 natural
substances, including kimchi, royal jelly, genistein and black tea, that have been shown to protect against this ubiquitous
toxicant.

Your Body Is Electrical And Runs On Electrons NOT Sugar, Protein Or Fat!
September 9 2015 | From: PhoreverYoung

Lifes clever. It figures out how to suck electrons out of everything you eat, everything you drink,
everything you absorb from the photons of the sun to the electrons attached to minerals and then
keep them under control to be used by the body when needed.
Every breath we take, every move we make so goes the song. Yet every move we make does
depend on every breath we take and every drink (or meal) we take, because our movement is
fueled by electrical (electron) energy that we store in the body. We receive our energy from
the sources of sun, air, food, water, and rocks.

Electrical energy doesnt just drop out of the air, food or water that we ingest. In its usual form it is not chemically available.
It cant always be called upon to support every move we make because it is not always ready for chemical reaction.
For any chemical reaction to occur there needs to be two molecules involved, and each of these molecules must have
something to trade, in the form of compatible atoms that are either positively or negatively charged.

Positively charged molecules (and the atoms within them) will easily and naturally unite with negatively charged molecules
of equivalent and compatible charge.
Put simply, all of your body functions rely on the electrical energy released from the unity of the charge of the molecules in
it and the opposite charge in food water or air that enters it.

So what is an ion?

An ion is any atom that has a positive or a negative charge. A positively charged ion will seek a negatively charged one to
unite with, have a glorious coupling and then turn into something totally new and available.

So why do we rave on so much about negative ions?

Because the result of every move you make (a net spending of electrical energy) is a positively charged body. The
molecules in your body are left holding a positive charge. They are unavailable for future couplings unless we get a new
batch of attractive and giving negative ions in quickly.

As we hear so often these days, things aint what they used to be. The air is different. Putting it very frankly and
unscientifically, its full of crud or acid. Positively charged ions are crud or acid. Nothing ever goes away on our little green
planet and every exhaust, every chimney plume, every release of gas, stays within our thin and fragile ionosphere.
It stays in the air we gulp as we run along the beach, it stays in the water we drink, and it stays in the food we eat. And all of
this acidic pollution or positive ions are useless for energy production within the body.

The air we breath in our garden, only 500 meters from the beach, contains only around 150 negative ions/cc/sec. but it also
contains around 700 positive ions. This means that even as we lay on the beach doing absolutely nothing, our bodies are
getting short-shifted by 2000 (required) plus 700 positive charged ions less 150 negative ions = 2550 ions/cc/second.

Other articles to read that validate Dr Young's theory that the body is electrical and runs on electrons:

New Scientist: Spark of life revisited thanks to electric bacteria

New Scientist: Meet the electric life forms that live on pure energy

Read the extensive full story at: PhoreverYoung

Johnson & Johnson Admits: Our Baby Products Contain Cancer-Causing

Formaldehyde
September 8 2015 | From: HealthyFoodHouse

Parents everywhere were shocked to learn that the No More Tears baby shampoo from Johnson &
Johnson contained formaldehyde, which has been shown to cause cancer and is most well-known
for its use in embalming dead bodies

But to find out just what the danger is in adding a substance like formaldehyde to baby products you have to look
at the evidence from research that has been done over the past few decades, and you must start by understanding
just what formaldehyde is.

Formaldehyde has a very strong smell, and it is highly flammable. It is a clear liquid that is used in dozens of different
products including cleaning solutions, building materials, glue, fabrics, paper products and insulation materials. It is also
used commercially for its anti-fungal, anti-bacterial and disinfectant properties.

Related: There Is Deadly Formaldehyde In Clothing, Food, Cigarettes And Vaccines - What Will You Be Wearing,
Eating, Smoking And Injecting Today?
But what about formaldehyde and cancer? Is it as dangerous as people think? Although the long-term research on
formaldehyde hasnt been completely finished, there are several signs that point to it as a carcinogen, or cancer-causing
agent.

In fact, the United States government has officially labeled it as such. The EPA has had it classified as a carcinogen since
1987.

There have been a number of studies that show that it does indeed cause cancer in both rats and humans and studies of
people that work around embalming fluid like embalmers have shown that they have a higher rate of cancer than other
groups. So the facts are fairly clear on whether or not formaldehyde really does cause cancer.

Johnson & Johnson Scandal

Although the company claims that the amount of formaldehyde isnt large enough to be detrimental to humans even infant
humans the fact is that it still has allowed this chemical for as long as they have been making the No More Tears
shampoo.

But now, the company has announced the removal of formaldehyde from that shampoo and they are removing it from one
hundred other products that they manufacture as well.
It could be seen as a sign of good intentions that the company is removing it from their products. But the real question is:
why hasnt it been removed before now?

Obviously, the product doesnt require that particular ingredient to be manufactured because they are now using a different
formula that is formaldehyde free.

Also, the timing is suspect because California just passed a law that required cosmetic companies to identify more than 160
chemicals that could be harmful to people that they previously had been keeping secret.

Johnson & Johnson isnt the only offender of including harmful chemicals in bath and body products. There are advocates
that are lobbying for other cosmetic companies to remove harmful ingredients after independent researchers found that their
products still contained the offending substances.

Johnson & Johnson claim that it cost them tens of millions of dollars to make the changes, so it isnt clear if other companies
will follow suit, or if they can even afford to.

Big Pharmas Shameful Secret & Governments Genocidal Culpability

September 7 2015 | From: MyEClinik

How is it that those who have the required education, claimed to have fully embraced the
Hippocratic Oath, observed professional code of ethics, are themselves deliberately killing
patients by the thousands with the very knowledge and tools they have professionally acquired?
How is it that the entire pharmaceutical industry able to get away with for profit murdering machine to operate in
broad daylight and no one from the entire government structure lifting a finger?

The more we dig into this deep and dark rabbit hole, the more we are convinced we are the only ones who can help
ourselves.

We are so grateful to all those who have contributed to our awareness so that we can also share with you some of the best
researched documentary that even a mainstream medium like Bloomberg could not ignore anymore. So, thank you very
much, John.

Below is just a small part of the whole genocidal machinery aimed to thin the herd of useless eaters they think we are.

Big Pharmas Shameful Secret

A six part Special Report by Bloomberg News, Big Pharmas Shameful Secret, is a massive documented indictment of the
pharmaceutical industry and its corrupt practices which would not be possible without the complicity of the stakeholders in
government and academia - both having become dependents of Big Pharma.

This report, following a year long investigation, documents this industrys widespread corrupt practices involving all the
major pharmaceutical companies and commercial CROs (contract research organizations) and most importantly, the report
documents FDAs abdication of its public responsibility.

The report documents how those who profit from the business of clinical trials exploit desperate, poor, and disenfranchised
people - immigrants, children, homeless people. None of the stakeholders in this seedy business are untainted: they all
exploit and abuse human beings as guinea pigs.
The Bloomberg Report corroborates our consistent criticism over the years about increasingly corrupt clinical trial practices,
and a dysfunctional system that protects itself while sacrificing both the safey of human subjects - whether they are patients
or healthy volunteersand the integrity of research findings.

This is a $50 billion business enterprise - that has nothing in common with medicine that was once governed by the
do no harm principle.

The radical shift occurred when Congress enacted a bad law: the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) in 1992.

Until then, 80% of clinical trials were conducted at academic centers. When Big Pharma began to contract commercial
CROs all semblance of ethical standards were swept aside. The culture of medical research changed radically as academia
competed for the lucrative drug testing business, its standards changed as well. Today, 75% of clinical trials are conducted
as described in this ground breaking series.

No one is safe.

You can download the PDF version of this very important and well researched documentary here.

Drug Industry Human Testing Masks Death, Injury, Compliant FDA

Oscar Cabanerio has been waiting in an experimental drug testing center in Miami since 7:30 a.m. The 41- year-old
undocumented immigrant says hes desperate for cash to send his wife and four children in Venezuela.

More than 70 people have crowded into reception rooms furnished with rows of attached blue plastic seats. Cabanerio is
one of many regulars who gather at SFBC International Inc.s test center, which, with 675 beds, is the largest for-profit drug
trial site in North America.

Across the U.S., 3.7 million people have enrolled in drug tests sponsored by the worlds largest pharmaceutical companies.
The companies have outsourced 75 percent of experimental drug trials to centers like SFBC, a leader in a $14 billion
industry.

At the same time, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has farmed out much of the responsibility for overseeing safety in
these tests to private companies known as institutional review boards. These boards are also financed by pharmaceutical
companies.
So, the drug industry is paying the people who do the tests - and most of the people who regulate those tests. And that
combination can be dangerous, and sometimes deadly.

The fundamental problem is a system in which investor- owned businesses have control over the evaluation of their own
products, says Marcia Angell, editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine from 1999 to 2000. Oversight of
clinical trials is too important to leave in the hands of drug companies and their agents.

'Im in a Bind'

Most of the people lining up at SFBC to rent their bodies to medical researchers are poor immigrants from Latin America,
drawn to this five-story test center in a converted Holiday Inn motel.

Inside, the brown paint and linoleum are gouged and scuffed. A bathroom with chipped white tiles reeks of urine; its floor is
covered with muddy footprints and used paper towels. The volunteers, who are supposed to be healthy, wait for the chance
to get paid for ingesting chemicals that may make them sick.

They are testing the compounds Big Pharma, the name for the worlds largest pharmaceutical companies, hopes to develop
into best-selling medicines.

Cabanerio, who has a mechanical drafting degree from a technical school, says he left Venezuela because he lost his job as
a union administrator. For him, the visit to SFBC is a last resort. Im in a bind, Cabanerio says in Spanish. I need the
money.

Conflicts of Interest

Few doctors dispute that testing drugs on people is necessary. No amount of experimentation on laboratory rats will reliably
show how a chemical will affect people. Helped by human testing, drugmakers have developed antibiotics capable of curing
life-threatening infections as well as revolutionary treatments for diseases like cancer and AIDS.

These medical success stories mask a clinical drug trial industry that is poorly regulated and riddled with conflicts of interest.
Every year, trial participants are injured or killed.
Rules requiring subjects to avoid alcohol and narcotics and to take part in only one study at a time are sometimes ignored
by participants, putting them at risk and tainting the test data.

The consent forms that people in tests sign - some of which say participants may die during the trial - are written in
complicated and obscure language. Many drug test participants interviewed say they barely read them.

Ken Goodman, director of the Bioethics Program at the University of Miami, says pharmaceutical companies are shirking
their responsibility to safely develop medicines by using poor, desperate people to test experimental drugs.

'Its an Eye-Opener

The setting is jarring, says Goodman, 50, who has a doctorate in philosophy, after spending 90 minutes in the waiting
rooms at SFBCs Miami center, which is also the companys headquarters.

Its an eye-opener. Every one of these people should probably raise a red flag. If these human subject recruitment
mills are the norm around the country, then our system is in deep trouble.

Pharmaceutical companies distance themselves from the experiments on humans by outsourcing most of their trials to
private test centers across the U.S. and around the world, says Daniel Federman, a doctor who is a senior dean of Harvard
Medical School in Boston.
The chief executive officers of drug companies should be held accountable for any lack of ethics in these tests, he says.
The CEOs of the companies have to be publicly, explicitly and financially responsible for the ethical approach, says
Federman, 77, who still sees patients. Its not possible to insist on ethical standards unless the company providing the
money does so.

Pressure for New Drugs

CEOs of 15 pharmaceutical companies that outsource drug testing to firms including SFBC - among them, Pfizer Inc., the
worlds largest drugmaker; Merck & Co.; and Johnson & Johnson - declined to comment for this story.

SFBC Chief Executive Arnold Hantman says his center diligently meets all regulations.

We take very seriously our responsibilities to regulatory authorities, trial participants, clients, employees and
shareholders, Hantman, 56, says.

We are committed to conducting research that fully complies with industry and regulatory standards.

The pressure pharmaceutical companies face to develop new drugs has intensified in the past 15 years.

Faced with the expiration of patents on best-selling drugs like AstraZeneca Plcs Prilosec, which has helped tens of millions
of people with heartburn and ulcers, Big Pharma has been in a frenzied race to find new sources of profit.

Oversight Secrecy
When the patent for a companys blockbuster drug expires, a lucrative monopoly vanishes. Such drugs typically lose 85
percent of their market share within a year of patent expiration, according to CenterWatch, a Boston-based compiler of
clinical trial data.

The private independent review board companies that oversee drug trials operate in such secrecy that the names of their
members often arent disclosed to the public.

The oldest and largest review company is Western IRB, founded in 1977 by Angela Bowen, an endocrinologist. WIRB, an
Olympia, Washington-based for-profit company, is responsible for protecting people in 17,000 clinical trials in the U.S.

The company oversaw tests in California and Georgia in the 1990s for which doctors were criminally charged and jailed for
lying to the FDA and endangering the lives of trial participants. No action was taken against WIRB. Bowen says she didnt
see human safety issues in those trials.

WIRB aims to visit test sites it monitors once every three years, Bowen says.

You can download the PDF version of this very important and well researched documentary here.

Read the full story at: MyEClinik

Electrosensitivity Recognised As A Disability In France

September 3 2015 | From: WestInfo

For the first time, in France, electrosensitivity has been recognised as a cause of severe disability
It is an hypersensitivity to electromagnetic waves, a sensitive issue in a society where the mobile phone and wifi
are ubiquitous.

Related: Yes, It Actually Says this in the Galaxy S5 User Manual

A judgment by the Court of Toulouse has, in fact, attributed to Marine Richard a disability of 85%, with a compensation of
around 800. The women, since years, is forced, because of his health problems, to live in the mountains, in an old barn,
with no electricity and using water from a natural spring.

The Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) is not officially recognized in France as a disease and it is a controversial
subject among experts. It could cause headaches, tingling, sleeping troubles and several transitional problems common to
many other disorders.
This last aspect would make it difficult to find clear diagnostic criteria and scientific basis to link the symptoms to exposure to
electromagnetic fields. However, it would be 700,000 cases in France, all difficult to identify because these special sufferers
tend to isolate themselves.

They are, in fact, people often live in caravans, caves, tents and in the woods.

Watch As Amazing GcMAF Treatment Kills Cancer Cells In Real Time

September 2 2015 | From: NaturalNews

Holistic Doctors 'suicided' over this stunning breakthrough

A breakthrough cancer treatment appears to be the reason why a handful of holistic doctors were recently found
"suicided" is now gaining worldwide attention as a potential universal cure for cancer. And new microscopic
footage released by First Immune shows this amazing remedy in action -- the human protein GcMAF is visually
seen activating the body's own macrophages, which are then able to attack and destroy breast cancer cells in vitro.

Related: Revealed - Cancer Industry Profits 'Locked in' by Nagalase Molecule Injected into Humans via Vaccines

The roughly two-minute video clip, which has been posted to YouTube, reveals the true healing power of GcMAF, a human
protein that the body makes naturally but that some people lack or can't produce in adequate volume.

By delivering an activated version of this substance intravenously, scientists have shown that the immune system can be
fully invigorated to destroy cancer cells on its own without the need for chemotherapy or radiation.

"Your GcMAF empowers your body to cure itself," explains the website GcMAF.se, operated by First Immune.

"In a healthy person your own GcMAF has 11 actions discovered so far, including two on cells, three excellent
effects on the brain, and 6 on cancer. Amongst these it acts as a 'director' of your immune system."

As you'll notice in the above video, GcMAF serves as the energized mechanism for macrophages to target and eliminate
breast cancer cells. The incredible mechanistic action of this substance is shown in amazing clarity, and is further described
in an associated paper entitled "Multifaceted immunotherapeutic effects of GcMAF on human breast cancer cells."

"Time lapse photography over 60 hours shows the cancer monolayer ... first changing from corrugated to smooth
... as the cancer is destroyed," reveals First Immune. "[T]hen the cancer 'fingers' are also eaten and destroyed by
the macrophages."

Holistic doctors 'suicided' over GcMAF, which threatens to put cancer industry out of business

Short for Globulin component Macrophage Activating Factor, GcMAF just so happened to be the primary focus of research
being conducted by Dr. Jeff Bradstreet, M.D., a Florida doctor who was found floating dead in a river back in June. His
sudden death was immediately ruled a suicide, even though he had a gunshot wound to the chest, suggesting he was
murdered.

Dr. Bradstreet's "suicide" was just one of about seven others that occurred all around the same time, and all within the
holistic healing community.

Dr. Bradstreet and his other now-dead colleagues had all been involved in research focused on GcMAF's potential as both a
treatment and cure for cancer, and one that doesn't produce deadly side effects like conventional cancer treatments do.

GcMAF doesn't actually cure cancer, of course -- it merely provides the ammunition needed by the body's own immune
system to eradicate and cure cancer itself, naturally. And this represents a threat to the pharmaceutical industry, which
profits to the tune of billions of dollars annually peddling quackery like chemotherapy and radiation, both of which have been
shown to cause more cancer.

"GcMAF and/or oral Colostrum MAF macrophage activation therapy is indicated in the treatment of any diseases
where there is immune dysfunction or where the immune system is compromised," explains the website of a clinic
out of Japan that sells an oral form of GcMAF.

Besides cancer, the conditions listed as appropriate candidates for GcMAF treatment include:

Cancer
Autoimmune diseases
Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)
Hepatitis B virus (HBV)
Herpes Simplex virus (HSV)
Cystitis
Hepatitis C virus (HCV)
Multiple sclerosis (MS)
Urinary tract infection (UTI)
Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD)
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
Endometriosis
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)
Lyme disease (Lyme borreliosis)
IgA deficiency disorder
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)
Mycobacteria infections
Parkinson's disease
Tuberculosis
Fibromyalgia
Human papillomavirus (HPV)
Lupus (Systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE)
HIV AIDS
Dengue fever
Pneumonia infection
Warts caused by viral infection
Norovirus
Malaria Influenza virus (flu)
Herpes simplex virus (HSV)
Q fever (Coxiella burnetii)
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)
Chicken pox (varicella zoster virus)
Psoriasis
Respiratory tract infections
Ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease
Type 1 diabetes (T1DM), insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM)
Type 1.5 diabetes, Latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA)

Read about other anti-cancer treatments from the independent media at AntiCancer.news

You can also do your own research on other types of cancer treatments at TruthWiki.org

David Versus Monsanto

August 29 2015 | From: Denkmalfilm

Imagine a storm blows across your property and that now, without your knowledge or consent,
genetically manipulated seeds are present in the garden you have tended for years.

A few days later, representatives of a multi-national corporation pay you a visit, demand that you surrender your
produce - and simultaneously file a criminal complaint against you, with a fine of 20,000, for the illegal use of
patented, genetically-manipulated seeds.

What's more: The court decides in favor of the corporate group. But you fight back.

Around the world, this story represents the bitter truth. Its the real-life experience of Canadians Percy und Louise
Schmeiser, winners of the Alternative Nobel Prize, who have been fighting chemical and seed manufacturer Monsanto since
1996. Today, nearly three-fourths of genetically manipulated plants harvested worldwide originated in Monsanto labs.
Monsanto is the U.S.-based corporation responsible for the invention of such devastating and discredited products as as
DDT, PCB and Agent Orange. Its aim is to gain absolute hegemony over plants - all the way from the field to the consumer's
plate. And in its efforts to achieve this goal, Monsanto has no qualms. Like the Schmeisers, farmers Troy Rush, David
Runyon and Marc Loisell have learned the hard way what it means to be confronted with Monsanto's methods of doing
business as have thousands of other farmers worldwide.

The Schmeisers and their allies are not only fighting against Monsanto and for their livelihood as farmers but for the
right to freedom of speech and to their property. And, above all, they are campaigning for the future of their children and
grandchildren so that they, too, will have the chance to grow up in a world free from genetically-manipulated food.

This film is for anyone who fears that, as individuals, we have no power to confront policymakers, large corporations or the
business world. David versus Monsanto offers hope: It shows that it can be done.

Fluoride: Poison On Tap Official Trailer

August 26 2015 | From: FramingTheWorld

History tells us that overturning myths are rarely easy. The fluoride story is similar to the fables
about lead, tobacco, and asbestos, in which medical accomplices helped industry to hide the truth
about these substances for generations.
As a new generation arises we must sound the alarm yet again.

For those who have ears to hear this film is meant to be a warning. This film will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that
fluoride is a deadly poison being added to our water supply.

The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal + What Is Aspartame? Five
Surprising Facts You Never Know About This Chemical Sweetener
August 21 2015 | From: DailyHealthPost / LiveFreeLiveNatural

Did you know that Aspartame was banned by the FDA twice? How is this product legal now? The
bittersweet argument over whether Aspartame is safe or not has been going on for a long time.
On one side we have medical evidence that suggests we should avoid using it and on the other side we lean on the
FDAs approval that suggests it is safe.

You would think that something so widely used and so well accepted would have quite the pristine story leading to its
acceptance. But that just isnt the case as you will soon discover after reading this post.

How Aspartame Became Legal

Born out of accident.

In the mid 1960's a chemist working for the company by the name of of G.D. Searle accidentally created aspartame in a
quest to produce a cure for stomach ulcers. Searle puts aspartame through some testing procedures and eventually gets
approval by the FDA.

Unfortunately, the testing process was among the worst. Not long after approval, the dangers of aspartame brought G.D.
Searle under major fire.

In fact: Aspartame triggered the first criminal investigation of a manufacturer put into place by the FDA in 1977 .

In 1980 the FDA banned aspartame from use after having 3 independent scientist study the artificial sweetener. Why?

Because they found that aspartame came with a high danger of inducing brain tumors.

Brain tumors: Bad. Aspartame banned by the FDA.

In January of 1981 Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, stated in a sales meeting that he was going to call in his markers and
make a push to get aspartame approved. That month Ronald Reagan was sworn in as President of the United States. His
transition team included Rumsfeld who hand picked Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes Jr. to be the new FDA Commissioner.
Within a couple of months, Hayes appointed a 5-person Scientific Commission to review the claims on aspartame. In a 3 2
decision, the panel upheld the original ban, stating that the artificial sweetener was unsafe.

Aspartame: Banned twice by the FDA.

Despite the panels decision, Hayes later installed a sixth member on the commission who voted in favor of the making
aspartame legal. The vote was now deadlocked.

So what happened?

Hayes personally broke the tie in aspartames favor. (Keep in mind that Dr. Hayes, a pharmacologist had no previous
experience with food additives before becoming the FDA Director.)

On July 18, 1981 Hayes officially approved the use of aspartame as an artificial sweetener in dry goods. (Hows this for a
kicker: In 1983 Hayes later left his post at the FDA amid accusations that he was accepting corporate gifts for political
favors. BUT, just before leaving office in scandal, Hayes approved the use of aspartame in beverages.)

The icing on the cake: In 1985 Searle was absorbed by Monsanto. Donald Rumsfeld reportedly received a $12 million
bonus. And the sad tale of fake food and experimentation on the human race continued onward.
December 1965 While working on an ulcer drug, James Schlatter, a chemist at G.D. Searle, accidentally discovers
aspartame, a substance that is 180 times sweeter than sugar yet has no calories.

Spring 1967 Searle begins the safety tests on aspartame that are necessary for applying for FDA approval of food
additives.

Fall 1967 Dr. Harold Waisman, a biochemist at the University of Wisconsin, conducts aspartame safety tests on infant
monkeys on behalf of the Searle Company. Of the seven monkeys that were being fed aspartame mixed with milk, one dies
and five others have grand mal seizures.

November 1970 Cyclamate, the reigning low-calorie artificial sweetener - is pulled off the market after some scientists
associate it with cancer. Questions are also raised about safety of saccharin, the only other artificial sweetener on the
market, leaving the field wide open for aspartame.

December 18, 1970 Searle Company executives lay out a Food and Drug Sweetener Strategy that they feel will put the
FDA into a positive frame of mind about aspartame. An internal policy memo describes psychological tactics the company
should use to bring the FDA into a subconscious spirit of participation with them on aspartame and get FDA regulators into
the habit of saying, Yes.

Spring 1971 Neuroscientist Dr. John Olney (whose pioneering work with monosodium glutamate was responsible for
having it removed from baby foods) informs Searle that his studies show that aspartic acid (one of the ingredients of
aspartame) caused holes in the brains of infant mice. One of Searles own researchers confirmed Dr. Olneys findings in a
similar study.

February 1973 After spending tens of millions of dollars conducting safety tests, the G.D. Searle Company applies for
FDA approval and submits over 100 studies they claim support aspartames safety.

March 5, 1973 One of the first FDA scientists to review the aspartame safety data states that:

"The information provided (by Searle) is inadequate to permit an evaluation of the potential toxicity of aspartame.

She says in her report that in order to be certain that aspartame is safe, further clinical tests are needed.

May 1974 Attorney, Jim Turner (consumer advocate who was instrumental in getting cyclamate taken off the market)
meets with Searle representatives to discuss Dr. Olneys 1971 study which showed that aspartic acid caused holes in the
brains of infant mice.
July 26, 1974 The FDA grants aspartame its first approval for restricted use in dry foods.

August 1974 Jim Turner and Dr. John Olney file the first objections against aspartames approval.

March 24, 1976 Turner and Olneys petition triggers an FDA investigation of the laboratory practices of aspartames
manufacturer, G.D. Searle. The investigation finds Searles testing procedures shoddy, full of inaccuracies and
manipulated test data. The investigators report they had never seen anything as bad as Searles testing.

January 10, 1977 The FDA formally requests the U.S. Attorneys office to begin grand jury proceedings to investigate
whether indictments should be filed against Searle for knowingly misrepresenting findings and concealing material facts
and making false statements in aspartame safety tests. This is the first time in the FDAs history that they request a criminal
investigation of a manufacturer.

January 26, 1977 While the grand jury probe is underway, Sidley & Austin, the law firm representing Searle, begins job
negotiations with the U.S. Attorney in charge of the investigation, Samuel Skinner.

March 8, 1977 G. D. Searle hires prominent Washington insider Donald Rumsfeld as the new CEO to try to turn the
beleaguered company around. A former Member of Congress and Secretary of Defense in the Ford Administration,
Rumsfeld brings in several of his Washington cronies as top management.
July 1, 1977 Samuel Skinner leaves the U.S. Attorneys office and takes a job with Searles law firm. (see Jan. 26th)

August 1, 1977 The Bressler Report, compiled by FDA investigators and headed by Jerome Bressler, is released. The
report finds that 98 of the 196 animals died during one of Searles studies and werent autopsied until later dates, in some
cases over one year after death. Many other errors and inconsistencies are noted. For example, a rat was reported alive,
then dead, then alive, then dead again; a mass, a uterine polyp, and ovarian neoplasms were found in animals but not
reported or diagnosed in Searles reports.

December 8, 1977 U.S. Attorney Skinners withdrawal and resignation stalls the Searle grand jury investigation for so long
that the statue of limitations on the aspartame charges runs out. The grand jury investigation is dropped.

June 1, 1979 The FDA established a Public Board of Inquiry (PBOI) to rule on safety issues surrounding NutraSweet.

September 30, 1980 The Public Board of Inquiry concludes NutraSweet should not be approved pending further
investigations of brain tumors in animals. The board states it has not been presented with proof of reasonable certainty that
aspartame is safe for use as a food additive.
January 1981 Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, states in a sales meeting that he is going to make a big push to get
aspartame approved within the year. Rumsfeld says he will use his political pull in Washington, rather than scientific means,
to make sure it gets approved.

January 21, 1981 Ronald Reagan is sworn in as President of the United States. Reagans transition team, which includes
Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of G. D. Searle, hand picks Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes Jr. to be the new FDA Commissioner.

March, 1981 An FDA commissioners panel is established to review issues raised by the Public Board of Inquiry.

May 19, 1981 Three of six in-house FDA scientists who were responsible for reviewing the brain tumor issues, Dr. Robert
Condon, Dr. Satya Dubey, and Dr. Douglas Park, advise against approval of NutraSweet, stating on the record that the
Searle tests are unreliable and not adequate to determine the safety of aspartame.

July 15, 1981 In one of his first official acts, Dr. Arthur Hayes Jr., the new FDA commissioner, overrules the Public Board
of Inquiry, ignores the recommendations of his own internal FDA team and approves NutraSweet for dry products. Hayes
says that aspartame has been shown to be safe for its proposed uses and says few compounds have withstood such
detailed testing and repeated close scrutiny.

October 15, 1982 The FDA announces that Searle has filed a petition that aspartame be approved as a sweetener in
carbonated beverages and other liquids.

July 1, 1983 The National Soft Drink Association (NSDA) urges the FDA to delay approval of aspartame for carbonated
beverages pending further testing because aspartame is very unstable in liquid form. When liquid aspartame is stored in
temperatures above 85 degrees Fahrenheit, it breaks down into DKP and formaldehyde, both of which are known toxins.
July 8, 1983 The National Soft Drink Association drafts an objection to the final ruling which permits the use of aspartame
in carbonated beverages and syrup bases and requests a hearing on the objections. The association says that Searle has
not provided responsible certainty that aspartame and its degradation products are safe for use in soft drinks.

August 8, 1983 Consumer Attorney, Jim Turner of the Community Nutrition Institute and Dr. Woodrow Monte, Arizona
State Universitys Director of Food Science and Nutritional Laboratories, file suit with the FDA objecting to aspartame
approval based on unresolved safety issues.

September, 1983 FDA Commissioner Hayes resigns under a cloud of controversy about his taking unauthorized rides
aboard a General Foods jet. (General foods is a major customer of NutraSweet) Burson-Marsteller, Searles public relation
firm (which also represented several of NutraSweets major users), immediately hires Hayes as senior scientific consultant.

Fall 1983 The first carbonated beverages containing aspartame are sold for public consumption.

November 1984 Center for Disease Control (CDC) Evaluation of consumer complaints related to aspartame use.
(summary by B. Mullarkey)

November 3, 1987 U.S. hearing, NutraSweet: Health and Safety Concerns, Committee on Labor and Human
Resources, Senator Howard Metzenbaum, chairman.

What Is Aspartame? Five Surprising Facts You Never Know About This Chemical
Sweetener

The controversy surrounding one of the worlds most popular artificial sweeteners, aspartame (NutraSweet, Equal),
continues some 30 years after the chemical was rammed through the regulatory process by pharmaceutical interests,
despite its well-documented dangers. And yet to this very day, many people are still unaware of the chemical sweeteners
sordid history, not to mention what aspartame is actually made from and how it affects the body and brain.
To many, aspartame is just another FDA-approved sugar alternative that has to be safe, otherwise it wouldnt be on the
market. But the truth about aspartame is much more sinister, including how the chemical sweetener gained market approval.
And theres so much more to the aspartame story that youve probably never heard before, thanks to government collusion
with powerful drug interests.

1) Aspartame is converted by the body into formaldehyde, a cancer-causing chemical.

Composed of three unique compounds, aspartame is a synergistically toxic chemical, meaning the sum of its individual parts
is exponentially more toxic than each one by itself. And yet even in isolation, the three main constituents found in aspartame
aspartic acid, phenylalanine, and methanol are idiosyncratically toxic in their own right.

Free methanol in particular is highly toxic, converting first into formaldehyde and then into formic acid upon consumption.
Unlike the methanol found in alcoholic beverages and various fruits and vegetables, the methanol produced by aspartame is
not accompanied by ethanol, which acts as a protector against methanol poisoning. By itself, methanol embalms living
tissues and damages DNA, and can cause lymphoma, leukemia, and other forms of cancer.

2) Aspartame causes obesity and metabolic syndrome.

Artificial sweeteners are typically viewed as a safe alternative to sugar, which many people now recognize as a cause of
weight gain and metabolic disorders like diabetes when consumed in excess. But a number of scientific studies have found
that chemicals like aspartame are perhaps even more damaging, as they promote weight gain in ways unrelated to caloric
intake.

A study published in the journal Appetite back in 2013 found that compared to sucrose, a form of sugar, aspartame is
actually worse in terms of promoting weight gain. Similar research published in the Yale Journal of Biology and
Medicine (YJBM) found that aspartame alters the bodys natural production of hormones, increasing both appetite and sugar
cravings.

3) Reagan-appointed FDA commissioner helped get aspartame approved despite evidence showing its toxicity.

Believe it or not, aspartame was an accidental discovery made by scientists working on the development of an ulcer drug for
G.D. Searle and Company, a pharmaceutical corporation that was later acquired by Monsanto in 1985. When researchers
discovered that the chemical had a sweet taste, G.D. Searle presented it to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for
commercial approval.
But the earliest safety studies conducted on the chemical found that it caused grand mal seizures and death in monkeys,
findings that were withheld from the FDA. When FDA scientists discovered on their own that aspartame was unsafe, G.D.
Searle made a strategic move, waiting for a new FDA commissioner appointed by the late Ronald Reagan to force the
chemical through the approval process.

The details of this political transaction are spelled out in the following document posted at the FDAs own website, but suffice
it to say that aspartame was never proven to be safe. It was only through corruption that this artificial sweetener ended up
making its way into more than 9,000 consumer products, many of which still contain it today.

4) Aspartame is made from the feces of genetically-modified (GM) E. coli bacteria.

Another disturbing fact about aspartame is that it is produced from the feces of genetically-modified E. coli bacteria. Similar
to the fermentation process, E. coli are modified with special genes that cause them to produce unnaturally high levels of a
special enzyme that, as a byproduct, produces the phenylalanine needed for aspartame production.

5) Aspartame crosses the blood-brain barrier, potentially causing permanent brain damage.
Aspartame is composed of roughly 40 percent aspartic acid, a free-form amino acid that has the ability to cross the blood-
brain barrier. When excess amounts of this compound via aspartame enter the body, brain cells are bombarded with an
excess of calcium. The result is neural cell damage and even cell death, which can lead to serious brain damage.

In extreme cases, exposure to aspartic acid, also known as aspartate, can cause neurological conditions like epilepsy and
Alzheimers disease, and is also implicated in causing diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS) and dementia. Endocrine
disorders, or imbalanced or inadequate hormone production, are also linked to so-called excitotoxin exposure, or exposure
to free-form amino acids like aspartate that overstimulate the brain.

Dr. Chris Shaw: Aluminium In The Body

August 20 2015 | From: Youtube / And another website that has been taken offline

Dr. Christopher Shaw is a neuroscientist at University of British Columbia and has been focusing
his research on neurotoxicity of aluminium and ALS-parkinsonism dementia complex.
And apologies, but on the other hand - no apologies with regards to the point that it is actually spelt aluminium.
Further to that - the rest of the world outside of America does not speak and write in "old english", it is in fact
actual English, not the bastardised version used in North America which seems to have an aversion to the correct
placement of and actual usage of vowels.

No offence intended; let's just get this straight for the record. If you need a lesson, we can find you a link regarding english,
as opposed to 'american'.

Aluminum adjuvants are found in many vaccines, including Gardasil.

The University Of Otago, FDA, Medsafe & Other Bodies Admit That Their Claims About
MMS Being Dangerous Are Not Supported By Any Scientific Evidence
August 17 2015 | From: MMS
The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) was asked by an MMS customer to provide the scientific studies or any
other evidence to support the statements made on their website; that using activated MMS (chlorine dioxide) in low
concentrations was dangerous. The customer had asked as follows;

Related: MMS and Jim Humble

Can you please send me (or direct me to), the scientific studies and any other evidence upon which you have
based your warnings against taking chlorine dioxide in the low concentrations being promoted by MMS users."

The FDA responded by directing the customer to the same 'statements made on their website' as being their evidence. That
is like going to court accusing someone of stealing from you, and the only evidence that you have, is you saying that they
stole from you!

The FDA further stated that they had no "additional information" to offer, that would scientifically support their claims.

See letter here;

The statements made by the FDA are the basis of most other warnings being released regarding MMS, such as those
released by Health Canada, Food Standards Authority in the UK, The Victorian Poisons Centre in Australia, Medsafe in NZ;
plus all of the related Media articles.

If the source of such claims now admit that they have published statements that are not supported by any scientific
evidence; wouldn't that cast the same unreliability upon all other such warnings?
For example, The Victorian Poisons Centre reference the FDA's statements as evidence of MMS being dangerous.

The Victorian Poisons Centre however admit that the only complaints that they have received, are from incorrect use of
MMS; see letter here;
As well as quoting the somewhat discredited warnings from the FDA, the Victorian Poisons Centre state in their letter above
that "there is no published scientifically sound evidence that MMS has any health benefits".

Because the FDA now admit that they have no scientific evidence of its correct use being harmful; the only real evidence
that we do have, is at least one University Study confirming that it is safe for human consumption;

"...the relative safety of oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide... was demonstrated".

(In one 6-month phase of the tests, the dosages were the same as MMS doses).

As unofficial evidence, we also have thousands of independent cases from around the world indicating that it works;

Other MMS customers have also received from official sources, similar responses to their requests for evidence of MMS
being dangerous, or evidence of harm resulting from correctly following the MMS sacraments of The Genesis II Church of
Health and Healing.

Here for example, Medsafe in NZ admit that their department has also conducted NO testing of MMS or chlorine dioxide,
upon which they could support any of their claims regarding MMS being dangerous;
Another letter confirms that in relation to safety, the National Poisons Centre has received no complaints or reports of
adverse reactions in relation to the use of MMS, over a 13 year period of it's use in NZ;
Likewise, the Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (CARM) has received no reports of adverse reactions in relation to
the use of MMS at the time of writing;
So with the somewhat discredited information published by the FDA (and then duplicated by other departments around the
world), put aside; here is what we are left with in relation to activated MMS (chlorine dioxide):

OFFICIALLY:

Scientific University study confirming low dose chlorine dioxide is safe for human consumption.

Supposedly no published scientific evidence that chlorine dioxide has any health benefits.

No scientific evidence that low dose chlorine dioxide causes harm.

Confirmation from many official sources, that no reports of harm have been received from using chlorine dioxide correctly.

UNOFFICIALLY:

Tens of thousands of individual cases from around the world confirming that chlorine dioxide has health benefits.

Tens of thousands of individual cases from around the world confirming that chlorine dioxide is being safely ingested.

Conclusions:
 It seems that the supposed absence of scientific evidence that chlorine dioxide has any health benefits, has had no
influence on actual results showing that it does!

The official sources agree with the results, that using activated MMS (chlorine dioxide) correctly has not caused serious
harm.

The Teflon Toxin - DuPont And The Chemistry Of Deception

August 16 2015 | From: TheIntercept

Ken Wamsley Sometimes Dreams that hes playing softball again. Hell be at center field, just like
when he played slow pitch back in his teens, or pounding the ball over the fence as the crowd goes
wild. Other times, hes somehow inexplicably back at work in the lab. Wamsley calls them
nightmares, these stories that play out in his sleep, but really the only scary part is the end, when I
wake up and I have no rectum anymore.

Wamsley is 73. After developing rectal cancer and having surgery to treat it in 2002, he walks slowly and gets up
from the bench in his small backyard slowly. His voice, which has a gentle Appalachian lilt, is still animated, though,
especially when he talks about his happier days. There were many.

While Wamsley knew plenty of people in Parkersburg, West Virginia, who struggled to stay employed, he made an enviable
wage for almost four decades at the DuPont plant here. The company was generous, helping him pay for college courses
and training him to become a lab analyst in the Teflon division.

He enjoyed the work, particularly the precision and care it required. For years, he measured levels of a chemical called C8 in
various products. The chemical was everywhere, as Wamsley remembers it, bubbling out of the glass flasks he used to
transport it, wafting into a smelly vapor that formed when he heated it. A fine powder, possibly C8, dusted the laboratory
drawers and floated in the hazy lab air.
The Du Pont family are in the top 300 of the Illuminati bloodline families

At the time, Wamsley and his coworkers werent particularly concerned about the strange stuff.

We never thought about it, never worried about it, he said recently. He believed it was harmless;

Like a soap. Wash your hands [with it], your face, take a bath.

Today Wamsley suffers from ulcerative colitis, a bowel condition that causes him sudden bouts of diarrhea. The disease also
can - and his case, did - lead to rectal cancer. Between the surgery, which left him reliant on plastic pouches that collect his
waste outside his body and have to be changed regularly, and his ongoing digestive problems, Wamsley finds it difficult to be
away from his home for long.

Sometimes, between napping or watching baseball on TV, Wamsleys mind drifts back to his DuPont days and he wonders
not just about the dust that coated his old workplace but also about his bosses who offered their casual assurances about the
chemical years ago.

Who knew? he asked.

When did they know? Did they lie?

The Washington Works DuPont plant in Parkersburg, West Virginia, on Wednesday, August 5, 2015.

Until recently, few people had heard much about chemicals like C8. One of tens of thousands of unregulated industrial
chemicals, perfluorooctanoic acid, or PFOA - also called C8 because of the eight-carbon chain that makes up its chemical
backbone - had gone unnoticed for most of its eight or so decades on earth, even as it helped cement the success of one of
the worlds largest corporations.

Several blockbuster discoveries, including nylon, Lycra, and Tyvek, helped transform the E. I. du Pont de Nemours
company from a 19th-century gunpowder mill into one of the most successful and sustained industrial enterprises
in the world, as its corporate website puts it.

Indeed, in 2014, the company reaped more than $95 million in sales each day. Perhaps no product is as responsible for its
dominance as Teflon, which was introduced in 1946, and for more than 60 years C8 was an essential ingredient of Teflon.

Called a surfactant because it reduces the surface tension of water, the slippery, stable compound was eventually used in
hundreds of products, including:

Gore-Tex and other waterproof clothing; coatings for eye glasses and tennis rackets; stain-proof coatings for
carpets and furniture; fire-fighting foam; fast food wrappers; microwave popcorn bags; bicycle lubricants; satellite
components; ski wax; communications cables; and pizza boxes.
Concerns about the safety of Teflon, C8, and other long-chain perfluorinated chemicals first came to wide public attention
more than a decade ago, but the story of DuPonts long involvement with C8 has never been fully told.

Over the past 15 years, as lawyers have been waging an epic legal battle - culminating as the first of approximately 3,500
personal injury claims comes to trial in September - a long trail of documents has emerged that casts new light on C8,
DuPont, and the fitful attempts of the Environmental Protection Agency to deal with a threat to public health.

This story is based on many of those documents, which until they were entered into evidence for these trials had been
hidden away in DuPonts files.

Among them are write-ups of experiments on rats, dogs, and rabbits showing that C8 was associated with a wide range of
health problems that sometimes killed the lab animals.

Many thousands of pages of expert testimony and depositions have been prepared by attorneys for the plaintiffs.
And through the process of legal discovery they have uncovered hundreds of internal communications revealing that DuPont
employees for many years suspected that C8 was harmful and yet continued to use it, putting the companys workers and
the people who lived near its plants at risk.
 The best evidence of how C8 affects humans has also come
out through the legal battle over the chemical, though in a more
public form.

As part of a 2005 settlement over contamination around the

West Virginia plant where Wamsley worked, lawyers for both
DuPont and the plaintiffs approved a team of three scientists,
who were charged with determining if and how the chemical
affects people.

In 2011 and 2012, after seven years of research, the science

panel found that C8 was more likely than not linked to
ulcerative colitis - Wamsleys condition - as well as to high
cholesterol; pregnancy-induced hypertension; thyroid
Ken Wamsley, 73, stands outside of his home in Parkersburg, West
disease; testicular cancer; and kidney cancer.
Virginia, on Tuesday, August 4, 2015

The scientists findings, published in more than three dozen peer-reviewed articles, were striking, because the chemicals
effects were so widespread throughout the body and because even very low exposure levels were associated with health
effects.

We know, too, from internal DuPont documents that emerged through the lawsuit, that Wamsleys fears of being lied to are
well-founded.

DuPont scientists had closely studied the chemical for decades and through their own research knew about some of the
dangers it posed. Yet rather than inform workers, people living near the plant, the general public, or government agencies
responsible for regulating chemicals, DuPont repeatedly kept its knowledge secret.

Another revelation about C8 makes all of this more disturbing and gives the upcoming trials, the first of which will be held this
fall in Columbus, Ohio, global significance: This deadly chemical that DuPont continued to use well after it knew it was linked
to health problems is now practically everywhere.

A man-made compound that didnt exist a century ago, C8 is in the blood of 99.7 percent of Americans, according to a 2007
analysis of data from the Centers for Disease Control, as well as in newborn human babies, breast milk, and umbilical cord
blood.

A growing group of scientists have been tracking the chemicals spread through the environment, documenting its presence
in a wide range of wildlife, including Loggerhead sea turtles, bottlenose dolphins, harbor seals, polar bears, caribou,
walruses, bald eagles, lions, tigers, and arctic birds.

Although DuPont no longer uses C8, fully removing the chemical from all the bodies of water and bloodstreams it pollutes is
now impossible. And, because it is so chemically stable - in fact, as far as scientists can determine, it never breaks down -
C8 is expected to remain on the planet well after humans are gone from it.
 'In some ways, C8 already is the tobacco of the chemical industry - a substance whose
health effects were the subject of a decades-long corporate cover-up.'

Eight companies are responsible for C8 contamination in the U.S. (In addition to DuPont, the leader by far in terms of both
use and emissions, seven others had a role, including 3M, which produced C8 and sold it to DuPont for years.)

If these polluters were ever forced to clean up the chemical, which has been detected by the EPA 716 times across water
systems in 29 states, and in some areas may be present at dangerous levels, the costs could be astronomical - and C8
cases could enter the storied realm of tobacco litigation, forever changing how the public thinks about these products and
how a powerful industry does business.

In some ways, C8 already is the tobacco of the chemical industry - a substance whose health effects were the subject of a
decades-long corporate cover-up. As with tobacco, public health organizations have taken up the cause - and numerous
reporters have dived into the mammoth story.

Like the tobacco litigation, the lawsuits around C8 also involve huge amounts of money. And, like tobacco, C8 is a symbol of
how difficult it is to hold companies responsible, even when mounting scientific evidence links their products to cancer and
other diseases.
There is at least one sense in which the tobacco analogy fails. Exposure to tobacco usually contains an element of volition,
and most people who smoked it in the past half century knew about some of the risks involved. But the vast majority of
Americans - along with most people on the planet - now have C8 in their bodies. And weve had no choice in the matter.

For its furst undred years DuPont mostly made explosives, which, while hazardous, were at least well understood. But by the
1930s, the company had expanded into new products that brought new mysterious health problems. Leaded gasoline, which
DuPont made in its New Jersey plant, for instance, wound up causing madness and violent deaths and life-long
institutionalization of workers. And certain rubber and industrial chemicals inexplicably turned the skin of exposed workers
blue.

Perhaps most troubling, at least to a DuPont doctor named George Gehrmann, was a number of bladder cancers that had
recently begun to crop up among many dye workers.

Worried over the tendency to believe [chemicals] are harmless until proven otherwise, Gehrmann pushed DuPont to create
Haskell Laboratories in 1935. Haskell was one of the first in-house toxicology facilities and its first project was to address the
bladder cancers. But the inherent problems of assigning staff scientists to study a companys own employees and products
became clear from the outset.

One of Haskells first employees, a pathologist named Wilhelm Hueper, helped crack the bladder cancer case by developing
a model of how the dye chemicals led to disease. But the company forbade him from publishing some of his research and,
according to epidemiologist and public health scholar David Michaels, fired him in 1937 before going on to use the chemicals
in question for decades.

DuPont elected not to disclose its findings to regulators.

C8 would prove to be arguably even more ethically and scientifically challenging for Haskell. From the beginning, DuPont
scientists approached the chemicals potential dangers with rigor. In 1954, the very year a French engineer first applied the
slick coating to a frying pan, a DuPont employee named R. A. Dickison noted that he had received an inquiry regarding C8s
possible toxicity. In 1961, just seven years later, in-house researchers already had the short answer to Dickisons question:

C8 was indeed toxic and should be handled with extreme care, according to a report filed by plaintiffs. By the next
year experiments had honed these broad concerns into clear, bright red flags that pointed to specific organs:

C8 exposure was linked to the enlargement of rats testes, adrenal glands, and kidneys. In 1965, 14 employees, including
Haskells then-director, John Zapp, received a memo describing preliminary studies that showed that even low doses of a
related surfactant could increase the size of rats livers, a classic response to exposure to a poison.

The company even conducted a human C8 experiment, a deposition revealed. In 1962, DuPont scientists asked volunteers
to smoke cigarettes laced with the chemical and observed that:

Nine out of ten people in the highest-dosed group were noticeably ill for an average of nine hours with flu-like
symptoms that included chills, backache, fever, and coughing.

Because of its toxicity, C8 disposal presented a problem.

In the early 1960s, the company buried about 200 drums of the chemical on the banks of the Ohio River near the plant. An
internal DuPont document from 1975 about Teflon Waste Disposal detailed how the company began packing the waste in
drums, shipping the drums on barges out to sea, and dumping them into the ocean, adding stones to make the drums sink.

Though the practice resulted in a moment of unfavorable publicity when a fisherman caught one of the drums in his net, no
one outside the company realized the danger the chemical presented. At some point before 1965, ocean dumping ceased,
and DuPont began disposing of its Teflon waste in landfills instead.

A view of Parkersburg, West Virginia, from Fort Boreman Park on Wednesday, August 5, 2015

In 1978, Bruce Karrh, DuPonts corporate medical director, was outspoken about the companys duty to discover and reveal
the unvarnished facts about health hazards, as he wrote in the Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine at the time.

When deposed in 2004, Karrh emphasized that DuPonts internal health and safety rules often went further than the
governments and that the companys policy was to comply with either laws or the companys internal health and safety
standards, whichever was the more strict. In his 1978 article, Karrh also insisted that a company;

Should be candid, and lay all the facts on the table. This is the only responsible and ethical way to go.

Yet DuPont only laid out some of its facts. In 1978, for instance, DuPont alerted workers to the results of a study done by 3M
showing that its employees were accumulating C8 in their blood.
Later that year, Karrh and his colleagues began reviewing employee medical records and measuring the level of C8 in the
blood of the companys own workers in Parkersburg, as well as at another DuPont plant in Deepwater, New Jersey, where
the company had been using C8 and related chemicals since the 1950s.

They found that exposed workers at the New Jersey plant had increased rates of endocrine disorders. Another notable
pattern was that, like dogs and rats, people employed at the DuPont plants more frequently had abnormal liver function tests
after C8 exposure.

DuPont elected not to disclose its findings to regulators. The reasoning, according to Karrh, was that the abnormal test
results werent proven to be adverse health effects related to C8. When asked about the decision in deposition, Karrh said
that at that point in time, we saw no substantial risk, so therefore we saw no obligation to report.

Not long after the decision was made not to alert the EPA, in 1981, another study of DuPont workers by a staff
epidemiologist declared that liver test data collected in Parkersburg lacked conclusive evidence of an occupationally related
health problem among workers exposed to C-8.

Yet the research might have reasonably led to more testing. An assistant medical director named Vann Brewster suggested
that an early draft of the study be edited to state that DuPont should conduct further liver test monitoring. Years later, a
proposal for a follow-up study was rejected.

If the health effects on humans could still be debated in 1979, C8s effects on animals continued to be apparent. A report
prepared for plaintiffs stated that by then, DuPont was aware of studies showing that exposed beagles had abnormal enzyme
levels indicative of cellular damage. Given enough of the stuff, the dogs died.

DuPont employees knew in 1979 about a recent 3M study showing that some rhesus monkeys also died when exposed to
C8, according to documents submitted by plaintiffs. Scientists divided the primates into five groups and exposed them to
different amounts of C8 over 90 days.
Those given the highest dose all died within five weeks. More notable was that three of the monkeys who received less than
half that amount also died, their faces and gums growing pale and their eyes swelling before they wasted away. Some of the
monkeys given the lower dose began losing weight in the first week it was administered. C8 also appeared to affect some
monkeys kidneys.

Of course, enough of anything can be deadly. Even a certain amount of table salt would kill a lab animal, a DuPont employee
named C. E. Steiner noted in a confidential 1980 communications meeting. For C8, the lethal oral dose was listed as one
ounce per 150 pounds, although the document stated that the chemical was most toxic when inhaled.

The harder question was to determine a maximum safe dosage. How much could an animal - or a person - be exposed to
without having any effects at all? The1965 DuPont study of rats suggested that even a single dose of a similar surfactant
could have a prolonged effect. Nearly two months after being exposed, the rats livers were still three times larger than
normal.

Steiner declared that there was no conclusive evidence that C8 harmed workers, yet he also stated that
continued exposure is not tolerable. Because C8 accumulated in bodies, the potential for harm was there, and
Steiner predicted the company would continue medical and toxicological monitoring and described plans to supply
workers who were directly exposed to the chemical with protective clothing.

Two years after DuPont learned of the monkey study, in 1981, 3M shared the results of another study it had done, this one
on pregnant rats, whose unborn pups were more likely to have eye defects after they were exposed to C8. The EPA was
also informed of the results. After 3Ms rat study came out, DuPont transferred all women out of work assignments with
potential for exposure to C8.

DuPont doctors then began tracking a small group of women who had been exposed to C8 and had recently been pregnant.
If even one in five women gave birth to children who had craniofacial deformities, a DuPont epidemiologist named
Fayerweather warned, the results should be considered significant enough to suggest that C8 exposure caused the
problems.
 As it turned out, at least one of eight babies born to women who
worked in the Teflon division did have birth defects.

A little boy named Bucky Bailey, whose mother, Sue, had

worked in Teflon early in her pregnancy, was born with tear
duct deformities, only one nostril, an eyelid that started down by
his nose, and a condition known as keyhole pupil, which
looked like a tear in his iris.

Another child, who was two years old when the rat study was
published in 1981, had an unconfirmed eye and tear duct
defect, according to a DuPont document that was marked
confidential.

Photos of Bucky Bailey as a baby, as well as article clippings his

Like Wamsley, Sue Bailey, one of the plaintiffs whose personal
mother, Sue, saved over the years injury suits are scheduled to come to trial in the fall, remembers
having plenty of contact with C8.

When she started at DuPont in 1978, she worked first in the Nylon division and then in Lucite, she told me in an interview.
But in 1980, when she was in the first trimester of her pregnancy with Bucky, she moved to Teflon, where she often sat
watch over a large pipe that periodically filled up with liquid, which she had to pump to a pond in back of the plant.
Occasionally some of the bubbly stuff would overflow from a nearby holding tank, and her supervisor taught her how to
squeegee the excess into a drain.

Soon after Bucky was born, Bailey received a call from a DuPont doctor. I thought it was just a compassion call, you know:
can we do anything or do you need anything? Bailey recalled. Shoot. I should have known better. In fact, the doctor didnt
express his sympathies, Bailey said, and instead asked her whether her child had any birth defects, explaining that it was
standard to record such problems in employees newborns.

While Bailey was still on maternity leave, she learned that the company was removing its female workers from the Teflon
division. She remembers the moment - and that it made her feel deceived. It sure was a big eye-opener, said Bailey, who
still lives in West Virginia but left DuPont a few years after Buckys birth.
Bucky Bailey stands inside his mothers home in Bluemont, Virginia, on Thursday, August 6, 2015

The Federal Toxic Substances Control Act requires companies that work with chemicals to report to the Environmental
Protection Agency any evidence they find that shows or even suggests that they are harmful. In keeping with this
requirement, 3M submitted its rat study to the EPA, and later DuPont scientists wound up discussing the study with the
federal agency, saying they believed it was flawed. DuPont scientists neglected to inform the EPA about what they had found
in tracking their own workers.

When DuPont began transferring women workers out of Teflon, the company did send out a flier alerting them to the results
of the 3M study. When Sue Bailey saw the notice on the bench of the locker room and read about the rat study, she
immediately thought of Bucky.

Yet when she went in to request a blood test, the results of which the doctor carefully noted to the thousandth decimal point,
and asked if there might be a connection between Buckys birth defects and the rat study she had read about, Bailey recalls
that Dr. Younger Lovelace Power, the plant doctor, said no. According to Karrhs deposition, he told Karrh the same.

We went back to him and asked him to follow up on it, and he did, and came back saying that he did not think it
was related.

I said, I was in Teflon. Is this what happened to my baby? Bailey remembered. And he said, No, no.

Power also told Bailey that the company had no record of her having worked in Teflon. Shortly afterward, she considered
suing DuPont and even contacted a lawyer in Parkersburg, who she says wasnt interested in taking her case against the
towns biggest employer. When contacted for his response to Baileys recollections, Power declined to comment.

By testing the blood of female Teflon workers who had given birth, DuPont researchers, who then reported their findings to
Karrh, documented for the first time that C8 had moved across the human placenta.
In 2005, when the EPA fined the company for withholding this information, attorneys for DuPont argued that because the
agency already had evidence of the connection between C8 and birth defects in rats, the evidence it had withheld was
merely confirmatory and not of great significance, according to the agencys consent agreement on the matter.

Ken Wamsley also remembers when his supervisor told him they had taken female workers out of Teflon. I said, Whyd you
send all the women home? He said, Well, were afraid, we think maybe it hurts the pregnancies in some of the
women, recalled Wamsley. They said, Ken, it wont hurt the men.

Read more at: TheIntercept

Ibuprofen Kills Thousands Each Year - So What Is The Alternative?

August 15 2015 | From: GreenMedInfo

The 2004 Vioxx recall, as you may remember, was spurred by the nearly 30,000 excess cases of
heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths caused by the drug between 1999-2003.

Despite the fact that scientific research had accumulated as early as 2000 linking Vioxx to increased heart attacks
and strokes, the drug's manufacturer Merck, and the FDA, remained silent as the death toll steadily increased.

The Reuters report focused on new research published in Lancet indicating the risk of heart attack increases as much as a
third and the risk of heart failure doubles among heavier users of NSAID drugs.

A recent Reuters' article opened with the following stunning sentence:

 Long-term high-dose use of painkillers such as ibuprofen or diclofenac is 'equally hazardous' in terms of heart
attack risk as use of the drug Vioxx, which was withdrawn due to its potential dangers, researchers said."

The 2004 Vioxx recall, as you may remember, was spurred by the nearly 30,000 excess cases of heart attacks and sudden
cardiac deaths caused by the drug between 1999-2003. Despite the fact that scientific research had accumulated as early
as 2000 linking Vioxx to increased heart attacks and strokes, the drug's manufacturer Merck, and the FDA, remained silent
as the death toll steadily increased.

The Reuters report focused on new research published in Lancet indicating the risk of heart attack increases as much as a
third and the risk of heart failure doubles among heavier users of NSAID drugs.

INFLAMED: Our Default Bodily State

Why are so many folks taking NSAID drugs like ibuprofen anyway?

Pain and unhealthy levels of inflammation are fast becoming default bodily states in the industrialized world. While in most
cases we can adjust the underlying pro-inflammatory conditions by altering our diet, and reducing stress and environmental
chemical exposures, these approaches take time, discipline and energy, and sometimes we just want the pain to stop now.

In those often compulsive moments we find ourselves popping an over-the-counter pill to kill the pain.

The problem with this approach is that, if we do it often enough, we may kill ourselves along with the pain...

Ibuprofen really is a perfect example of this. As mentioned above, this petrochemical-derivative has been linked to
significantly increased risk of heart attack and increased cardiac and all-cause mortality (when combined with aspirin),
with over two dozen serious adverse health effects, including:

1. Anemia

2. DNA Damage

3. Hearing Loss
 4. Hypertension

5. Influenza Mortality

6. Miscarriage

Ibuprofen is, in fact, not unique in elevating cardiovascular disease risk and/or mortality. The entire category of non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) appears to have this under-recognized dark side; cardiovascular disease and
cardiac mortality score highest on the list of over 100 unintended adverse health effects associated with their use.

See also our analysis of the rarely acknowledged dark side to aspirin: The Evidence Against Aspirin And For Natural
Alternatives.

So, what does one do? Pain is pain. Whether it happens to you, or you witness it in another (which can be worse), finding
relief is a top priority.

Research on Natural Alternatives To Ibuprofen

Here is some evidence-based research on alternatives to ibuprofen, sourced from the National Library of Medicine:

Ginger A 2009 study found that ginger capsules (250 mg, four times daily) were as effective as the drugs mefenamic acid
and ibuprofen for relieving pain in women associated with their menstrual cycle (primary dysmenorrhea).

Topical Arnica A 2007 human study found that topical treatment with arnica was as effective as ibuprofen for hand
osteoarthritis, but with lower incidence of side effects.

Combination: Astaxanthin, Ginkgo biloba and Vitamin C - A 2011 animal study found this combination to be equal to or
better than ibuprofen for reducing asthma-associated respiratory inflammation.

Chinese Skullcap (baicalin) A 2003 animal study found that a compound in Chinese skullcap known as baicalin was
equipotent to ibuprofen in reducing pain.

Omega-3 fatty acids: A 2006 human study found that omega-3 fatty acids (between 1200-2400 mg daily) were as effective
as ibuprofen in reducing arthritis pain, but with the added benefit of having less side effects.

Panax Ginseng A 2008 animal study found that panax ginseng had analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity similar to
ibuprofen, indicating its possible anti-rheumatoid arthritis properties.

St. John's Wort A 2004 animal study found that St. John's wort was twice as effective as ibuprofen as a pain-killer.

Anthrocyanins from Sweet Cherries & Raspberries A 2001 study cell study found that anthrocyanins extracted from
raspberries and sweet cherries were as effective as ibuprofen and naproxen at suppressing the inflammation-associated
enzyme known as cyclooxygenase-1 and 2.

Holy Basil A 2000 study found that holy basil contains compounds with anti-inflammatory activity comparable to
ibuprofen, naproxen and aspirin.

Olive Oil (oleocanthal) a compound found within olive oil known as oleocanthal has been shown to have anti-inflammatory
properties similar to ibuprofen.

There are, of course, hundreds of additional substances which have been studied for their pain-killing and/or anti-
inflammatory effects, and there are also aromatherapeutic approaches that do not require the ingestion of anything at
all, but there is also a danger here. When we think of taking an alternative pain-killer to ibuprofen, we are still thinking within
the palliative, allopathic medical model: suppress the symptom, and go on about our business.

It would behoove us to look deeper into what is causing our pain. And when possible, remove the cause(s). And that often
requires a dramatic dietary shift away from pro-inflammatory foods, many of which most Westerners still consider absolutely
delightful, e.g. wheat, dairy, nighshade vegetables and even wheat-free grains, etc.

There Is Deadly Formaldehyde In Clothing, Food, Cigarettes And Vaccines - What Will
You Be Wearing, Eating, Smoking And Injecting Today?
August 9 2015 | From: NaturalNews

As you may know, formaldehyde, a highly carcinogenic fluid, is used to embalm the dead and
preserve the cadaver for viewing purposes, such as at open casket ceremonies or for anatomy,
dissection and surgery classes.
Ranked one of the most hazardous compounds to human health, formaldehyde can cause liver damage,
gastrointestinal issues, reproductive deformation, respiratory distress and cancer.

When a person dies, the first stage of decomposition is autolysis or self-digestion, because the active process of digestion of
nutrients by live cells has ceased. Digestive enzymes therefore enter the cells and start breaking them down. Methods of
preserving cadavers have changed over the past two centuries, but formaldehyde is the main embalming chemical used
today.

It's a colorless solution that maintains that life-like texture of the body for an extended period of time, and this "fixation" of the
cadaver terminates all ongoing biochemical reactions. Many people recall their first experience with formaldehyde in high
school biology class, where specimens float in glass jars in an awfully stinky liquid called formalin, which is simply
formaldehyde gas mixed with water.

The smell alone is enough to send two out of every three people running out of the room. And now onward to the health
discussion.

Little do most people know today that formaldehyde shows up where they least expect it, like in their food, clothing,
cosmetics, vaccines and flu shots. Maybe they don't know because they can't smell it.

Many of today's cosmetics and home-building materials contain and release formaldehyde, as do chemically-treated forms
of cotton, silk and wool. Ever tried on new clothes and itched like crazy right away?
Even lotions and deodorants can contain preservative molecules that react to become formaldehyde, a.k.a. "releasers" - that
way the manufacturer can trick the consumer because they don't have to list formaldehyde as an ingredient or chemical
used to make the product or treat it.

Exposure to formaldehyde can cause contact dermatitis, allergic reactions, rashes and yes, leukemia. If you're a woman
who uses cosmetics or lotions with chemicals in them, they end up in your blood. If you're a man who uses antiperspirant
and deodorants with chemicals in them, they end up in your blood.

What do you think happens when your clothing contains formaldehyde and you work out and sweat while wearing those
"cotton" T-shirts, underwear and sweat pants? What about the sheets you sleep on? Is it time to demand organic clothing,
linens and diapers?

Cotton is a crop, don't forget, which happens to involve 25 percent of the world's pesticide use, including insecticide and
fungicide. Did you know it takes about one-third of a pound of pesticide to grow enough cotton for one T-shirt? What do you
get when you mix pesticide with formaldehyde and "consume" it? Ask a smoker.

Formaldehyde in Vaccines, Diet Drinks and Clothing

FYI: Aspartame turns into formaldehyde in the human body:

"Since 1987, formaldehyde has been listed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a probable
human carcinogen. Used as an embalming agent, formaldehyde has been indicated in birth defects, and in
environmental allergies.

It has been shown to cause both lymphoma and leukemia in lab rats and in humans. It is known that aspartame
turns into formaldehyde in the body, but it has been thought that this formaldehyde was then being eliminated
quickly. However, a study in 1998 demonstrated that dietary aspartame binds to tissues in protein. It was found in
liver, kidney, and blood.

The report suggested that the buildup of aspartame was cumulative; that is, it continues to build up without being
excreted, causing more damage over time. This report concluded that "aspartame consumption may constitute a
hazard because of its contribution to the formation of formaldehyde adducts."

After 20 years of poisoning its consumers with Aspartame, PepsiCo says it's removing aspartame from Diet Pepsi, but
inserting Sucralose instead. Sucralose is created in a laboratory and is synthetic. How much of this carcinogen will they
need to use keep their Diet Pepsi fans?

That's like if some evil scientist said he took the mercury out of vaccines but was going to use snake venom instead. Trading
one evil for another. Still, toxic Aspartame will remain in thousands of products manufactured and sold around the world in
food, sodas, protein shakes and gum and candy for the children.

Then there's formaldehyde in vaccines, which is highly dangerous because vaccines bypass breathing and digestive filters.
Formaldehyde is listed by CDC as an ingredient in Diphtheria/Tetanus/Polio vaccine.

It's also listed on the Hepatitis B and flu shots, along with deadly aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate and bovine cow
serum. The scariest part is that formaldehyde has been known to FAIL TO DEACTIVATE THE VIRUS the vaccine is
intended to cure, thus enabling a live virus to enter your blood and infect your system.

Related: AntiCorrpuption Society: CDC Exposed

Take the "die" out of your "diet." Never eat, drink, smoke, inject or put deadly chemicals like formaldehyde on your skin
again. You do have a choice and knowledge is power.

Is Your Family's Health Being Traded For Profit?

July XX 2015 | From: BoughtMovie

New BOUGHT Documentary Exposes Ugly Truth Behind Vaccines, GMO's and Big Pharma.
 This is arguably the most powerful film ever created that tells the truth about vaccines, medications and GMOs.

- Mike Adams, Natural News

Click here to visit the official website.

Prominent Doctor Reveals Key Hidden Healthcare Lies

July 29 2015 | From: NaturalSociety

Doctors now dispense different advice on every medical matter. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick is certainly
no ordinary doctor. He has broken ranks with his profession and written an unusually candid
account about how the medical game really works.
That he has gotten away with such an honest appraisal of the game, which has been played (on the public) for many
decades, is quite extraordinary.

Dr Kendrick takes a scalpel to the world of medical research and dissects it for your inspection. He reveals the
tricks that are played to make minute risk look enormous. How the drug trials are hyped, the data manipulated, the
endless games that are played to scare us into doing what, in many cases, makes the most money.

Related: How You Can Restore Your Health, Enabling Your Body To Self-Repair From Virtually Any Disease Or
Affliction

For those who are uninitiated in this particular game, it is important to understand a few of the basic principles upon which it
is based, as well as some of the ground rules.
Ever since the Rockefeller Foundation was founded in 1913, there has been a plot afoot to commercialize every aspect of
Americas [and the worlds] medical and health industries.

Toward that end, every opportunity has been taken advantage of to create revenue streams from every medical
condition and health challenge imaginable.

The basic strategy revolves around the three pillars of medical language:

First, a difficult-to-understand medical lexicon was created in order to distance the medical
doctor and other experts from the common man.

Secondly, special degrees, credentials, and associations were established so that the doctor
was deified by society.

Thirdly, each component of the Medical-Pharmaceutical- Health Insurance-Hospital-Government

Complex (MPHIHGC) was brought on board early in the game by way of mutually guaranteed
economic advantages and financial incentives.

The government piece of this Complex includes the Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services,
Veterans Administration, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Disease Control, Surgeon General, and National
Institutes of Health, among many other federal, state, and county health-related agencies.

This 3rd pillar - the MPHIHGC - was key to ensuring that no one individual or organization ever left the reservation. The
economic advantages conferred by the American Medical Association, for instance, were simply too attractive for member
physicians to turn them down.

Likewise, the financial incentives to act as a glorified pharmaceutical salesman for the drug companies were also too
tempting for doctors to refuse.

This game was set up in such a way that if anyone ever tried to leave the reservation, they would likely never get back on it.

Losing a medical license is a very easy thing to do.

Especially when youre competing with state-sponsored monopolies like the American Dental Association, the dentists
themselves can be counted on to make sure that one of their own never goes rogue.

In this way self-policing keeps the entire system intact; in fact, it has easily withstood decades of truth-speaking rebels who
simply accepted their fates as professional pariahs.

The 10 Biggest Healthcare Lies:

Vaccines make you healthy

Pharmaceuticals prevent disease

Doctors are experts in health

You have no role in your own healing

Disease is bad luck or bad genes

Screening = Prevention

Health insurance is out to keep you healthy

Hospitals are places of health and healing

Conventional medicine is advanced

Mystification of the Disease, the Causes and the Treatments

By constructing a medical lexicon that is so abstruse, complex and shrouded in mystery, the doctors were able to
speak to each other with an exclusive jargon that the patient wasnt able to understand .

In this manner, the diseases have systematically undergone a process mystification, as have the causes and the treatments.
When someone finds out that their disease process is called Osteochondritis dissecans, what are they to do?

The physician is in the drivers seat for the rest of the trip. And what a trip they will
take you on! (In my own case, as 9 year old boy, the Park Avenue doctor told me
to take 20 aspirin a day for life, in order to mitigate the Osteochondritis
dessicans.)

As for the true cause of Osteochondritis dissecans, well, that will almost never be
found out through medical examination or revealed by the physician.

The white-coated doctor with his stethoscope around his neck acts as high priest
who keeps all the sacred medical knowledge and health wisdom secret. Needless
to say, not everyone believes in this system or the doctors godlike status.

If the individual is savvy enough to do his own sleuthing, which is actually fairly
easy for a self-observant person, the cause(s) of his or her ailment can usually be
identified.

Common sense and the faculty of reason can really work wonders when utilized
regularly. The internet is particularly helpful in doing all kinds of medical research
and health investigation.

When it comes to the treatment side, that will always fit the practice of the attending physician. An inguinal hernia patient will
always receive the same advice from a surgeon - Surgery, surgery, and more surgery.

Even though hernias can be repaired without surgery, the surgeon only makes money when you submit to the
scalpel.
Once the first surgery is completed, a second one is often likely on the other side of the groin because the root cause is
rarely, if ever, addressed.

The Mainstream Media Operates at the Hub of the Complex

Back to our good friend Dr. Malcolm Kendrick. What he is addressing is the unspoken relationship that exists between every
organ of the Mainstream Media (MSM) and the Complex.

These two work very closely to keep the people sufficiently confused and ignorant about every medical issue and health
question under the sun. In this way, the unaware public, most of whom have placed their complete trust in the medical
system, is at a total loss.

Usually they come no closer to understanding what really ails them or how to effectively treat the true causes of their
maladies by reading MSM disinformation, misinformation and false information.

The MSM is the key cog in this game being run every day of the week for over a century. As Dr. Kendrick aptly points out,
there are so many conflicting treatment opinions and competing medical theories that your head spins.

By confounding the average medical consumer, they can usually be convinced through fear-based consultation to
agree with the doctors advice.

As long as the health insurance pays the medical bills, the patient feels they are getting a great deal. Of course, many a post-
menopausal woman may have needlessly given up a gallbladder, but at least it didnt cost her anything!

Conclusion

Weve only scratched the surface of this medical game. However, once you know the basic rules and standard physician
MO, its fairly easy to keep yourself from losing a body part or your mind from taking too many prescriptions.

On the other hand, the medical model is very useful for dispensing emergent care for trauma, as well as urgent care for
acute episodes. Hospital ERs have saved many lives, just as burn clinics have restored many a fire victim to good health.

So, allopathic medicine does have great utility, particularly in a somewhat dangerous modern society with car wrecks and the
like.

The bottom line, for each and every consumer who enters the medical marketplace, is: BUYER BEWARE!
If Vaccines Don't Cause Brain Damage, Why Is GlaxoSmithKline Paying Out $63
Million To Vaccine Victims?
July 27 2015 | From: NaturalNews

Since the swine flu panic that was widespread in 2009, prompting more than 60 million people to
get vaccinated against it, countless amounts of individuals - predominantly children - have
developed a range of health conditions.

Mainly, brain damage has been the issue; everything from sleep disturbances and memory impairments to
hallucinations and mental illness have been experienced by those who received the swine flu vaccine.

Most medical professionals and Big Pharma folks are quick to defend and recommend such vaccines; of course pharma
giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), the manufacturers of the swine flu vaccine, Pandemrix, is a key player in this regard.

However, they've come under fire recently and rather than sit under a protective you-can't-touch-me cloak, the pharma giant
has been ordered to pay about $60 million to the UK government after it was determined that Pandemrix played a role in
causing brain damage in a range of cases.

"No doubt" swine flu vaccine linked to brain damage

 "There's no doubt in my mind whatsoever that Pandemrix increased the occurrence of narcolepsy onset in children
in some countries - and probably in most countries," says Emmanuelle Mignot, a specialist in sleep disorder
at Stanford University who looked into the effects of the vaccine.

About 80 percent of those affected have been children, but GSK continually turned a blind eye. Even when a study came out
showing that vaccinated children where 13 times more likely to develop narcolepsy, the company didn't admit any link. Even
when, in 2011, the European Medicines Agency issued a warning that people under 20 should refrain from getting
the vaccine, GSK didn't pay attention.

They maintain that they are professionals dedicated to human health; the GSK website currently says;

"At GSK responsible business is how we do business. Our mission is to improve the quality of human life by
enabling people to do more, feel better, live longer."

Sure, tell that to eight-year-old Josh Hadfield, from Somerset, England. He took Pandemrix and guess what? He's now on
anti-narcolepsy drugs to help keep him awake in school, something which costs approximately $15,000 annually.

"If you make him laugh, he collapses. His memory is shot. There is no cure," his mother says.

"He says he wishes he hadn't been born. I feel incredibly guilty about letting him have the vaccine."

GSK website puts emphasis on "delivering financial performance"

Interestingly, the same GSK website that talks about the company's responsibility to help others feel good and live long lives
also touches on a more pressing issue, at least for them - and it's one that says a mouthful. Just a few sentences below its
statement of health dedication, in larger font that stands out from the rest of the copy, it says;

"How we operate is just as important to us as delivering financial performance."

The statement is attributed to Sir Andrew Witty, GSK CEO. So there you have it. That, my friends, is it in a nutshell, basically
as close as we'll come to "hearing" straight from the source itself that all Big Pharma truly has in mind is the health of their
numbers.

Of course the fact that GSK will be paying the UK government millions of dollars to those who now have brain damage from
taking Pandemrix also speaks volumes.

It acts as an admission that taking the vaccine is indeed a health problem; otherwise, why would GSK be on board with
giving money to those who are now hardly able to function in their daily lives? It they truly felt they were in the right, they'd
stand firm and refuse to make any payments, right?

"There has never been a case like this before," says Peter Todd, a lawyer who represented many of the claimants
in the U.K.

"The victims of this vaccine have an incurable and lifelong condition and will require extensive medication."

It's expected that even more people will develop brain injuries associated with taking the swine flu vaccine, especially
narcolepsy and cataplexy, which makes a person lose consciousness whenever they experience deep emotions such as the
basic act of laughing.
FDA-Approved Drug That Literally Saps Human Will And Turns People Into Obedient
Zombies
July 25 2015 | From: NaturalNews

When I lived in Ecuador, I was warned about the pollen from the flower of a beautiful tree.

The pollen is called "Devil's Breath," and when a tiny amount is blown into the face of an intended victim, it
immediately saps that person's free will, turning them into a compliance zombie who will do anything they're
commanded to do: Empty their bank account, engage in sexual acts or even donate a kidney.

This isn't some urban legend, either. The Devil's Breath pollen is rich in scopolamine, a potent drug that saps free will and
turns people into zombies. Scopolamine can "can wipe the memory of its victims," reports the Daily Mail:

Scopolamine can be blown in the face of a passer-by on the street, and within minutes, that person is under the
drug's effect - scopolamine is odourless and tasteless.

'You can guide them wherever you want,' he explained. 'It's like they're a child.'

...The drug, he said, turns people into complete zombies and blocks memories from forming. So even after the
drug wears off, victims have no recollection as to what happened." (Shhhhh! Please don't tell Bill Cosby!)

If all this sounds exactly like what we're all witnessing in American society today, that's because drug companies have
turned scopolamine into an FDA-approved prescription drug.

Sold today as a transdermal patch, the scopolamine drug is offered under the name "Transderm Scop" and it's designed to
be placed right behind the ear, allowing the scopolamine drug to be absorbed into the bloodstream.

When the scopolamine chemical enters the bloodstream, it immediately affects the brain, turning a normal human being into
an auto-suggestion hypnosis subject who believes and obeys anything they hear. If that person happens to be watching
MSNBC while absorbing this drug, they might mindlessly come to believe that they're supposed to vote for Hillary Clinton
because she's so smart, honest and awesome!

Combine this drug with the effects of mass fluoridation and widespread antidepressant drug use and you get a toxic
cocktail of mind-numbing drugs that sap free will and turn humans into walking zombies.

Transderm Scop is marketed as a motion sickness treatment

The drug... turns people into complete zombies and blocks memories from forming. So even after the drug wears
off, victims have no recollection as to what happened," reports the Daily Mail.

It kind of sounds like exactly what we're seeing today with all the people who voted for President Obama in the 2008 and
2012 elections. They have no recollection what they voted for, and they can't seem to realize that all of Obama's campaign
promises were outright lies.

They voted out of obedience, not rational thinking, and now as so many of the very people who voted for Obama find
themselves jobless, laid off or with their work hours cut, they're starting to come to their senses and ask, "What have I
done?"

Now, mindless obedience is available as an FDA-approved pharmaceutical. It's a Brave New World, after all, and you can't
have let people have the freedom to think, can ya?

Watch the VICE documentary here:

Scientists Researching The Effect Of Aluminium Exposure Appeal To The Public

July 20 2015 | From: GreenMedInfo / Various

Aluminum [Aluminium] has been linked to diseases such as cancer, autism, and Alzheimer's. This toxic
material is entering the human body via everyday consumption of food, water, cosmetics and an
increasing number of vaccinations.
Aluminum has been named as the second most used metal in the world after steel, largely because it is so versatile. It can
be found in our food, drinking water, atmosphere, medication, vaccinations and cosmetics. The lazy 'american-english
spelling'; 'Aluminum' often causes confusion and so is noted here for reference.

According to U.S. Department of Energy, the United States' aluminum industry is the world's largest, processing 9.6 million metric
tons of metal and producing about $40 billion in products and exports in 2003.

However, despite its versatility and its many uses, aluminum has become one of most negatively talked about products used today.
In recent months, scientists have linked its use to cancer, autism, Alzheimer's disease and chemical burns.

So, what is being done to protect the public from its many dangers?

Aluminum is Toxic and Potentially Harmful to Humans

Professor Christopher Exley, often referred to as Mr. Aluminum, has been studying the effects of aluminum on the human body for
thirty years and has become increasingly worried. In a recent video presentation, he explained that, despite the fact that aluminum
has been regularly used as an adjuvant in vaccination for many years, little is known about its effect on the human body.

He made it clear that we should accept that aluminum is toxic and that toxicity may take many different forms. He stated that
wherever it ends up in the body, it has the potential to do harm.
This is certainly something to consider, especially when none of us can be certain where an aluminum adjuvant will accumulate
once it has been vaccinated into our body.

Professor Exley continued by stating that:

If aluminum is in the brain, it can produce neurodegeneration and problems associated with the brain; if it is in the
bone, it can produce bone disease. Wherever it ends up in the body, it has the potential to cause toxicity, whether
it is in humans, fish or any other living organism."

Taking this a little bit further, Professor Exley explained that it is possible for two individuals to have very similar amounts of
aluminum in their body and for only one of them to suffer an adverse effect, which he says could be due to individual physiology,
medical history and genetics.
 Speakin
g about the different ways in which the body can absorb aluminum, Professor Exley talked about the gut, the lungs, the nose and
the skin before moving on to the subject of vaccination and adjuvants. He stated that we must understand that aluminum exposure
in this form is very different from any other form of exposure.

Discussing his work, he said:

Currently, we are researching the simple things. For example, when you inject an adjuvant, what is its fate? What
happens to it? What happens to it, relative to the antigen that it was injected with?

We are about to be able to publish what we believe is for the first time unequivocal evidence that, yes, immune
cells do come to the site of the injection, they do take up aluminum particles and they will transport them
elsewhere."

Professor Exley continued:

"In other words, once you have been vaccinated with a vaccine containing an aluminum adjuvant at an injection
site, there is the potential for it to go anywhere in the body and if it is such an effective adjuvant at an injection site,
then could it not be an equally effective adjuvant elsewhere?

In other words, if particulate aluminum gets carried into the brain or into another organ, then it could have the
potential to act as an adjuvant there, couldn't it? Could it not induce the type of inflammatory response that you see
at the site of an injection in any other type of tissue where that adjuvant material ends up, simply because it's been
carried there?"

If Professor Exley is correct, could his research explain why so many babies develop encephalitis (inflammation of the brain) shortly
after receiving multiple vaccinations containing aluminum?
Number of Vaccinations Containing Aluminum is on the Rise

Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, a scientist working at the University of British Columbia, Canada, believes that the level of aluminum children
receive in their diet and childhood vaccinations is far in excess of the safe levels recommended.

In a paper that she wrote in 2010, titled Aluminum and Alzheimer's Disease: After a Century of Controversy, Is there a
Plausible Link?, she explained that the blood brain barrier (BBB) in young children is immature, making them more susceptible to
toxic substances. She stated that:

According to the latest vaccination schedule, every child in the USA will receive a total of 56 mg of Al by the age
of 2 years, or up to 1.475 mg of Al during a single visit to the pediatrician (Table 6). This is contrary to the upper
limit of 5g Al/kg/day set by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for premature neonates and individuals with
impaired kidney function.

Healthy neonates may be able to handle more Al, however, there are no such studies available upon which we
could safely estimate acceptable upper levels of Al from parenteral or injectable sources in healthy children. In that
respect, it is worth noting that the FDA document states that Al accumulation at levels associated with central
nervous system and bone toxicity may occur at even lower rates of exposure."

Reading through her detailed vaccination schedules, you will see that the amount of aluminum a small baby can receive in just one
visit to the doctor's office is of great concern.

According to her vaccination charts, a child aged two months is scheduled to receive the following vaccinations:

Hepatitis BRotavirus

DPT (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus)

Hib (haemophilus influenzae type b)

PCV (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine)

IPV (polio vaccination)

Using the figures supplied by Dr. Tomljenovic in her paper, in just one visit, an eight week-old baby could receive vaccinations
containing a cumulative sum of 1.225 1.475 mg of aluminum, an amount well in excess of the FDA's recommendations.

If children are receiving well in excess of the recommended doses of aluminum per visit to the doctor, plus
the high doses of aluminum in their food and drinking water, then it is fairly safe to assume that if this
pattern continues to old age, combined with the aluminum used in other products such as medication and
cosmetics, then the long-term effect on the brain could be catastrophic, especially to an elderly person.

Aluminum Loaded Vaccines Linked to Autism

A further study conducted by Canadian scientists Professor Christopher Shaw and Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic revealed that the more
vaccines that children receive containing the adjuvant aluminum, the greater their chance is of developing autism, autoimmune
diseases and neurological problems in the future.

Meanwhile, in the realm of real science, autism rates have skyrocketed 296% over the last few years as the vaccine push has
grown more aggressive. See the rising rate depicted in the red line of the bar chart below, as shown in the newly published study:

"Trends in the Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder, Cerebral Palsy, Hearing Loss, Intellectual Disability, and Vision
Impairment, Metropolitan Atlanta, 1991 -- 2010."
In 2013, in their paper, published by Springer Science+Business Media, titled Aluminum in the Central Nervous System (CNS):
Toxicity in Humans and Animals, Vaccine Adjuvants, and Autoimmunity, they revealed that during a 17-year period, the rates
of autism had increased significantly in countries that had the most vaccinations containing the adjuvant aluminum.

A Highly Significant Correlation

The researchers compared the number of vaccines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during
the period from 1991 2008 and the changes in the autism rates during the same period. They wrote:

The data sets, graphed against each other, show a pronounced and statistically highly significant correlation
between the number vaccines with aluminum and the changes in autism rates. Further data showed that a
significant correlation exists between the amounts of aluminum given to preschool children and the current rates of
autism in seven Western countries.

Those countries with the highest level of aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines had the highest autism rates."

They revealed that:

"The observed correlation between the number of aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines and ASD was further tested
using Hill's criteria and met eight of nine of these indicating that vaccines containing aluminum are highly likely to
be at least partially causal for autism."

For those who are not familiar with 'Hill's criteria,' it is a technique used to determine a causal link between a specific factor and a
disease. For example, does excess smoking cause lung cancer?
Scientists seeking "to establish a valid causal connection between a potential disease agent" now frequently use the technique,
which was first developed by British medical statistician Austin Bradford Hill.

Professor Shaw and Dr. Tomljenovic continued their paper by adding that:

There are other links between aluminum exposure/toxicity and ASD. These include the following:

A pilot study showed higher than normal aluminum levels in the hair, blood and/or urine of autistic children;
children are regularly exposed to higher levels of aluminum in vaccines per body weight than adults; practically,
nothing is known about the pharmacokinetics and toxicodynamics of aluminum in vaccines in children; and
aluminum in vaccines has been linked to serious neurological impairments, chronic fatigue and autoimmunity."

If Professor Shaw and Dr. Tomljenovic are correct, then their results are extremely worrying, especially as autism is not the only
condition to which their paper linked the adjuvant aluminum.
In fact, their paper also linked aluminum to the rise in the incidence of Alzheimer's disease, Gulf War syndrome and a
relatively new syndrome, ASIA (autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants), that was identified by scientists in 2011.

What is the Answer?

In 2006, Professor Exley and his team wrote a paper titled Non-invasive therapy to reduce the body burden of aluminium in
Alzheimer's, in which the team discussed ways to reduce the body burden of aluminum in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

They wrote that:

Based upon the premise that urinary aluminium is the best non-invasive estimate of body burden of aluminium
patients with Alzheimer's disease were asked to drink 1.5 L of a silicic acid-rich mineral water each day for five
days and, by comparison of their urinary excretion of aluminium pre-and post this simple procedure, the influence
upon their body burden of aluminium was determined".

For the purpose of their study, the team used the mineral water Volvic, because of its high concentrations of the mineral silicic acid,
which Professor Exley says can reduce body burden of aluminum through the urine if drank regularly.
He believed that by reducing the body burden of aluminum in patients with Alzheimer's disease, this process may slow down the
diseases progression.

On page 18 of the paper they wrote that:

The primary objective in Week 1 was to obtain an estimate of the patient's normal urinary Al excretion. Patients
were provided with pristine airtight sample bottles and asked to collect their first urine of each of five consecutive
days. It was neither practical nor ethically acceptable to ask patients to collect 24 hour urine samples.

However, the use of 'spot' samples to estimate urinary Al excretion was validated as explained in Section 2.2
below. The urine samples were stored in appropriate biohazard bags in the patient's refrigerator

before being collected, transported to the laboratory and frozen at 20C. In Week 2 patients were asked to drink
up to 1.5 L of silicic acid-rich mineral water (hereafter referred to by its brand name 'Volvic') per day for each of five
consecutive days. Once again, beginning with the first day which followed drinking the first 1.5 L of Volvic, the
patients were asked to collect their first urine sample of the day and to repeat this for five consecutive days.

Storage, collection, transport and treatment of urine samples were as per Week 1. In this way we collected five
pre-Volvic (Week 1) and five post-Volvic (Week 2) urine samples for each of the ten patients.

Patients completed record cards on which they indicated how much Volvic they drank on each day and whether or
not they drank it neat or used it to make other beverages. Patients were not asked to drink the 1.5 L of Volvic as an
additional constituent of their daily diets but to include it as part of their diets for that week.

Apart from drinking Volvic in Week 2 the patients were encouraged to carry out their normal daily routines and to
adhere to their usual diets."

The results of their study were reported to be very encouraging and have spurred the team to do more work in the future.
The team concluded that:

We have carried out the first study to determine if silicic acid in a potable water might be used to reduce the body
burden of Al in individuals with AD.

While the small number of participants must imply that our results are preliminary the statistical significance
achieved for the Volvic-facilitated reduction of the body burden of Al is encouraging and future research will both
increase the number of study participants and extend the period of time over which therapy is administered.

A final aim is, of course, to determine if lowering the body burden of Al has any influence upon the incidence,
progression and aetiology of AD."

If it is possible to influence the progression of Alzheimer's disease, might it be possible to slow down the progression of other
neurological disorders, including autism?

Related: The Vaccine-Autism Lie

Parents State Vaccine-Injured Daughters are Improving

Another vaccine known to contain the adjuvant aluminum is the human papillomavirus vaccination (HPV). In 2011, Professor
Exley spoke to professionals at a conference on vaccination safety, where once again he mentioned his work on aluminum and
mineral water.

At approximately 47 minutes 45 seconds in the video, he stated:

Like many of you, I am contacted on a regular basis by people who have been adversely affected, sometimes by
vaccination and other aluminum-related issues. I have been contacted by parents of girls who have taken the
human papillomavirus vaccination and they have said, is there anything we can do, has it got anything to do with
aluminum?
 I don't tell them it's got anything to do with aluminum, that is not my role, I am not a doctor. I would simply tell them
look, if there is anything to do with aluminum, try taking a silicon-rich mineral water, I tell them which one.

I am increasingly getting emails back six months, a year later, telling me their daughter is better. I am not making
this up. Their daughter is better; I say well, it might have had something to do with that, it might be something else
that you are doing, but that's great news.

So, anecdotally, at least we're getting good results here; we need, of course, to get proper scientific data as well
for people potentially getting better, simply by drinking a silicon-rich mineral water. (words taken from the video)"

If Professor Exley is correct, then this could mean that something as simple as drinking silicon-rich mineral water may have the
potential to help many other vaccine injured children including those children with autism.

Sadly, to enable scientists such as Professor Exley and his team to gain the scientific data and knowledge required, they would
need this research to be funded.

Public Appeal for Exciting New Research

On July 14, 2015, Professor Exley launched an appeal to the public titled The Peoples Trial The First Clinical Trial to Test the
Aluminium / Alzheimer's Disease Hypothesis to enable further research to proceed.

In his video, he explains that as yet, a cure for Alzheimer's disease has not been found. This is because scientists do not know the
cause of the disease.

He believes that if he and his team were able to carry out further research on the known links between Alzheimer's disease and
aluminum, then it may be possible to slow down the progression of the disease.

He stated that:

One factor which has been linked to Alzheimer's disease for actually 50 years now is human exposure to
aluminum, exposure to aluminum in our everyday life.

However, in all that time there has never been a clinical trial to test whether our exposure to aluminum in our
everyday life contributes to Alzheimer's disease. The idea therefore in this trial, is to test this hypothesis, that
aluminum has a role to play in the disease."

Professor Exley explained how he and his team propose to recruit individuals suffering from the early stages of Alzheimer's disease
and ask them to drink a litre of silicon-rich mineral water every day for two years and monitor the progress of their disease. He
stated:
 If this trial is successful, for example in demonstrating a role of aluminum in Alzheimer's disease, then not only will
we have shown that aluminum plays a role but we will have an effective treatment, we will have the first effective
treatment."

Of course, if the team is successful, then their work could potentially pave the way for further trials examining the link between
aluminum and other neurological conditions, including autism, Tourette syndrome and epilepsy.

Sadly, as yet, Professor Exley has been unable to secure the necessary funding that he and his team would require to carry out
such a trial and he now believes that an appeal to the public may be only the way that they will be able to carry out their work.

In a press release advertising the appeal he stated that:

This is why we are asking for the public's help to support and fund a clinical trial which will establish once and for
all if human exposure to aluminium is a contributory factor in Alzheimer's disease.

Full details of the proposed clinical trial, the funding required to carry it out and how the public can support the trial
by making a donation are all available through the following website;www.futsci.com or here.

Further details about this appeal and the proposed trial can be found at the link above.
The Shocking Truth About Antidepressant Drug Studies +
Peter Breggin MD: How Do Psychiatric Drugs Really Work?
July 20 2015 | From: iHealthTube / Breggin

Dr. Timothy Scott explains why antidepressant studies are not effective. Dr. Scott mentions a
number of ways drug companies can make the studies turn out in favor of their drug.

But does it come at a cost to your health? When more than 10% of Americans are on these drugs, it's obviously big
business!

Peter Breggin MD: How Do Psychiatric Drugs Really Work?

Psychiatrist Peter R. Breggin, MD in the second of his series: Simple Truths About Psychiatry:
How Do Psychiatric Drugs Really Work?
Further information may be found on Dr. Breggin's website and in his many books, including his latest:
"Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal: A Guide for Prescribers, Therapists, Patients and Their Families."
Using Hand Sanitizer Causes You To Absorb 10,000% More Emasculation Chemicals
That Feminize Men
July 17 2015 | From: NaturalNews

Hand sanitizer causes the skin to absorb 100 times more of the hormone-disrupting chemical
bisphenol A (BPA), according to a study conducted by researchers from the University of Missouri
and published in the journal PLOS ONE.

IBPA exposure came from handling receipts printed on thermal paper, the kind typically issued by cash registers.

Research had previously shown that hand sanitizers cause the skin to absorb higher levels of chemicals, but this had not
previously been demonstrated with BPA.

"Our research found that large amounts of BPA can be transferred to your hands and then to the food you hold and
eat as well as be absorbed through your skin," lead author Frederick vom Saal said.

Levels high enough to cause disease

Much attention has focused in recent years on the dangers of BPA, which in addition to receipts is also found in clear, hard
plastics and in the linings of food and beverage cans.

"BPA exhibits hormone-like properties and has been proven to cause reproductive defects in fetuses, infants,
children and adults as well as cancer, metabolic and immune problems in rodents," vom Saal said.
 "BPA from thermal papers will be absorbed into your blood rapidly; at those levels, many diseases such as
diabetes and disorders such as obesity increase as well."

BPA has also been linked to heart disease and infertility.

In the new study, participants were told to handle receipt paper for various lengths of time. Some of the participants used
hand sanitizer before handling the paper, and some ate French fries by hand after touching the paper. BPA levels in the
participants' blood, skin and urine were measured before and after each intervention.

The researchers found that handling receipt paper for 45 seconds caused BPA levels on the skin to rise to 581 g; 40
percent of this occurred in just the first 2 seconds. After about 4 minutes, skin levels had fallen by 27 percent, probably as
the chemical was absorbed into the body.

Ninety minutes after handling receipts, the average participant had blood and urine levels of 20 mg BPA/g creatinine, levels
that have been previously associated with increased risk of heart disease and type 2 diabetes. The levels seen are also
considered high enough to increase the risk of developmental abnormalities in children.

Participants who had previously used hand sanitizer had blood and urine levels 100 times higher than those who had not
used the chemicals. BPA levels increased more in women than in men, although the reason for this is unknown.

Drop toxic hand sanitizer!

The findings are particularly worrisome for people who handle receipts all day at work, the researchers said.

"Store and fast food receipts, airline tickets, ATM receipts and other thermal papers all use massive amounts of
BPA on the surface of the paper as a print developer," vom Saal said.

"The problem is, we as consumers have hand sanitizers, hand creams, soaps and sunscreens on our hands that
drastically alter the absorption rate of the BPA found on these receipts."

The researchers noted that people who handle receipts and then eat food actually get exposed to BPA twice: some through
the skin, and then some by mouth. Therefore, the researchers recommend not eating immediately after handling thermal
receipts. Best of all, they said, would be to avoid BPA altogether.

Hand sanitizer has also previously been linked to other health problems, including endocrine disruption, immune dysfunction
and cancer. Studies have also shown that it contributes to the evolution of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and creates bacterial
imbalance on the skin - possibly even increasing users' risk of infection.

Pfizer Vice President Blows The Whistle & Tells The Truth About The Pharmaceutical
Industry
July 15 2015 | Via: RushFM | From: CollectiveEvolution

Dr Peter Rost, former Vice President of Pfizer, and now whistle-blower, certainly knows what he is
talking about. A great, courageous man, when you do research on him. Its amazing they havent
put a bullet in the back of his head.
This certainly shows how incredibly corrupt the pharmaceutical industry is and how it controls all
medical doctors, university professors, universities and governments getting them to lie about
vaccines and drugs, including ours here in NZ.

Pfizer is one of the most corrupt and powerful multinationals that DIRECTLY controls the Government Health and
University medical establishment in both Australia and here in New Zealand.

In fact, if you search online for Immunisation Advisory Centre Pfizer Auckland (the centre is based at Auckland University
which controls all of their propaganda to the NZ public about vaccines) you will see a Pdf file come up titled, Immunization
Health Report which incredibly, lays out the whole multinational pharmaceutical drug company mafia propaganda plans to
implement vaccines on the naive, stupid, New Zealand public.

In this deceptive plan, you will note it is sponsored by Pfizer, in collusion with the Government, including a
Foreword by Hon Tony Ryall, NZ Minister of Health and the Hon Jo Goodhew, Associate Minister of Health, with a
message from Frances Benge, Managing Director, Pfizer New Zealand.

On top of this, Dr Jeffrey Bruce Smaill BSc (Hons), PhD, Senior Research Fellow at the Auckland Cancer Society Research
Centre at the University of Auckland, in the biography of him here, notes he collaborates with Circadian Pharmaceuticals
and Pfizer Global Research and Development, exactly as Dr Peter Rost says happens.

If this is not enough, introduced to australia two years ago (yes the Aussies are even more stupid than we are) in March
2015, Pfizer launched its smartphone app Vaximate in New Zealand from Middlemore Hospital in collusion with the Health
Department, the New Zealand medical psychopaths etc., to support the multinational mafia immunisation program and
ensure parents and kids remain brain dead and get their jabs on time.

Talk about big pharma mind- control through that smartphone. The cheek of it all. Almost unbelievable!

If I had a vaccine-damaged child, based on the evidence of Dr Peter Rost, I would file a mult-million dollar class lawsuit in
the High Court against Pfizer, the New Zealand Medical Association and the Government for collusion (a crime in itself),
corruption and bribery for knowingly lying about the true dangers of vaccines.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg. The more you look into it, the worse it gets. Yet 94% of New Zealand population are
still vaccinated according to Government statistics. What a shocker! You wonder if the masses will ever wake up,
because, Dr the evidence is now so compelling.

Incidentally, I Googled Dr Peter Rost, and he has filed lawsuits against the giant pharmaceutical companies, and won
(mainly out of court settlements). Ive also researched Pfizer in the past, one of the most corrupt corporations on the face of
the planet with a history of providing kickbacks and bribery of politicians, doctors and university professors.

Indeed, the last thing you ever would want to do is believe what they say about anything, least of all vaccines.

Pfizer Vice President Blows The Whistle & Tells The Truth About The Pharmaceutical Industry
Below is a clip taken from the One More Girl documentary, a film regarding the Gardasil vaccine, which was
designed to prevent Human Papillomavirus. In it, Dr. Peter Rost, MD, a former vice president of one of the largest
pharmaceutical companies in the world (Pfizer), shares the truth about the ties between the medical and
pharmaceutical industry.

Rost is a former vice president of Pfizer, and a whistleblower of the entire pharmaceutical industry in general. He is
the author of The Whistleblower, Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman. Considering his work experience, it would
be an understatement to say that he is an insider expert on big pharma marketing.

Below are a couple of quotes from both a former and a current editor-in-chief of the two largest, and what are considered to
be the most credible, medical journals in the world. Its only fitting to include them into the article as they are directly related
to what Dr. Rost hints at in the video.

It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment
of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached
slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime editor-in-chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ) (source)

The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.
Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of
interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a
turn towards darkness.

Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the Lancet considered to be one of the most well respected
peer-reviewed medical journals in the world. (source)
Its Time To Re-Think Current Medical Research & See The Bigger Picture

In 2005 Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis, currently a professor in disease prevention at Stanford University, published the most
widely accessed article in the history of the Public Library of Science (PLoS) entitled Why Most Published Research
Findings Are False. In the report he states:

"There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false.

We now have a large amount of evidence, and statements from experts that come directly from the field, which paint a very
concerning picture. The science used to educate doctors and develop medicine is flawed.

We are only ever exposed to studies that have been sponsored by big pharmaceutical companies, but these
studies are not designed to take the long view.

They are not designed to detect problems that can occur years or even decades after a treatment, or examine the risks of
taking a drug for long periods of time. Nobody ever seems to mention or acknowledge the many studies which clearly show
significant risk associated with many of the products that pharmaceutical companies are manufacturing to help fight
disease.

Turns out taking the little red pill was a better option than taking the little blue pill all along

What is even more concerning is the general populations lack of awareness when it comes to these facts. This issue is
definitely not going to be addressed in the mainstream news, and despite plenty of evidence to support it, some people will
refuse to even look at or acknowledge that it exists.

This is a big problem, our world is changing and we must keep an open mind and be open to new possibilities regarding the
nature of our world. Its 2015, and as we keep moving forward there will be more information coming out that challenges the
deeply held, engrained belief systems of many.

Its okay to look at information that goes against what you believe, in fact, its needed if we are going to move forward and
create a better world for ourselves.
You would think the statements above the video, from longtime editors of such major, peer-reviewed scientific journals
(apparently, the best in the world) would at least get some mainstream attention.

When Dr. Rost was still working for Pfizer he had a couple of appearances in the mainstream media.

Here is an example of him speaking with the Wall Street Journal almost 10 years ago, before he blew the whistle.

This is why alternative media is important, especially in a time where more and more people are waking up to what is really
happening on our planet.

Its time to examine the research thats being conducted all over the world, from experts (scientists) at various institutions,
that is not sponsored by these giant, multinational health corporations the independent literature. Brilliant work is being
published regarding various drugs, cures, treatments, vaccines, and more.

Thanks for reading, and I hope the video above gives you something to think about.

Three Alternative Health Doctors Found Dead In the Last Two Weeks After Run-Ins
With The Feds + Merck Created Hit List To "Destroy," "Neutralize" Or "Discredit"
Dissenting Doctors
July 14 2015 | From: FreeThoughtProject / CBS

In the past several weeks, a number of controversial natural health doctors have died under
mysterious circumstances. Some of them have even had recent encounters with federal agents
and bureaucracies.
Two weeks ago, the string of mysterious deaths began when Dr. Jeff Bradstreet MD was found in a river with a
gunshot wound to his chest. The police claim that the gunshot wound was self-inflicted and that the death was a
suicide, however, Bradstreets family suspects foul play.

Related: Body Of Doctor Who Linked Vaccines To Autism, Found Floating In River

Last week, members of the family set up a donation page:

"To find the answers to the many questions leading up to the death of Dr Bradstreet, including an exhaustive
investigation into the possibility of foul play.

In just one week, the page has already managed to raise over $25,000, many of those donations coming from former
patients who were helped by Dr. Bradstreets controversial treatments.

Another death came on Fathers Day, June 21, when Dr. Bruce Hedendal DC Ph.D., of the Miami area, was found dead in
his car with no explanation as to how it happened. As of right now, there are even fewer details about the circumstances
surrounding Hedenals death as there are about the death of Bradstreet.

To make matters even more suspicious, both doctors have had run-ins with the feds due to their unconventional treatments,
which had been known to help people. In fact, just weeks before his death Bradstreets office was raided by the FDA.

If two dead doctors in the same field, and same region of the country in such a short time span was not suspicious enough,
Dr. Teresa Sievers, another natural health doctor from Florida, also died under mysterious circumstances earlier this week.

According to Sievers website, she also specialized in holistic health treatments. She was allegedly murdered by an
unknown attacker in an upscale neighborhood that experiences very little crime.

Each of these doctors were described as very healthy people with no major health problems, and no real reason for anyone
to target them for murder, nor did they show any signs of depression.

Merck Created Hit List To "Destroy," "Neutralize" Or "Discredit" Dissenting Doctors

Merck made a "hit list" of doctors who criticized Vioxx, according to testimony in a Vioxx class
action case in Australia. The list, emailed between Merck employees, contained doctors' names
with the labels "neutralise," "neutralised" or "discredit" next to them.

Related: New Merck Allegations: A Fake Journal; Ghostwritten Studies; Vioxx Pop Songs; PR Execs Harass Reporters

According to The Australian, [2009 link no longer works] Merck emails from 1999 showed company execs complaining
about doctors who disliked using Vioxx. One email said:

"We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live ..."

The plaintiffs' lawyer gave this assessment:

"It gives you the dark side of the use of key opinion leaders and thought leaders ... if (they) say things you don't like
to hear, you have to neutralise them ... It does suggest a certain culture within the organisation about how to deal
with your opponents and those who disagree with you."

The Australian:

The court was told that James Fries, professor of medicine at Stanford University, wrote to the then Merck
head Ray Gilmartin in October 2000 to complain about the treatment of some of his researchers who had
criticised the drug.
 "Even worse were allegations of Merck damage control by intimidation," he wrote, ... "This has happened to at
least eight (clinical) investigators ... I suppose I was mildly threatened myself but I never have spoken or written on
these issues."

The allegations come on the heels of revelations that Merck created a fake medical journal - the Australasian Journal of
Bone and Joint Medicine - in which to publish studies about Vioxx; had pop songs commissioned about Vioxx to inspire its
staff, and paid ghostwriters to draft articles about the drug.

It's All In The Water: A Case In Point Regarding Contaminants & Additives In Our
Water Supplies
July 14 2015 | From: NewZealandHerald

It all began with severe skin problems, an 'eureka moment', and a truck load of determination. Lee
Blenkinsop has suffered from eczema since he was a child, yet his skin was clear of problems
during the years he worked in the Netherlands.

Four years ago, he and his Kiwi wife Amanda moved their young family to New Zealand.

"At the time, I didn't really think about it. I was a busy sales manager and had a hectic schedule."

As soon as they shifted to Auckland, Lee's skin problems returned with a vengeance - his hands began to peel, and he
developed an itchy scalp and ears. His 3 year old daughter developed eczema for the first time.

Lee's 'eureka moment' came when he realised Auckland's chlorinated water was the culprit after talking with his doctor.
 "They don't put any chlorine in the water in Holland, but the chlorination, as well as heavy metals, can be quite
hefty here."

Lee installed a water filter in his home, and it greatly reduced the irritation to his skin and his daughter's.He developed an
interest in the industry and worked as a national sales director for a company that produced water filters, and he enjoyed
developing the products. However, he could see where improvements could be made and how to pass on significant
savings to customers. So he took the brave step of going out on his own.

In September last year, Lee set up Pureflo.

"We are passionate about what we do at Pureflo. We don't just pop in a filter for your drinking water; we help you
with a whole home water filter, so when you shower you don't get irritants on the skin."

Since he was 21, Lee has run his own sales and marketing businesses in the UK and the Netherlands, in a diverse range of
industries from charities to home alarm systems - so is no stranger to the potential pitfalls of start-ups. For this reason, he
manages Pureflo with tight reins, and careful accountability.

When he began the business, he managed to stay out of the red through careful planning of income and expenses. Working
from home in the first stages helped and he bought his top-end products on consignment, so he didn't need to cover the
costs until a customer bought from him.

Now with clear skin, and their cash flow under control, Lee is taking the next steps in achieving his aspirations of making
Pureflo a household name.

The Idiot Cycle: What You Aren't Being Told About Cancer
July 6 2015 | From: JPSFilms

The award-wnning documentary The Idiot Cycle (2009) about the companies involved in producing
toxic chemicals, cancer treatments and genetically modified crops.
The Idiot Cycle is a 2009 French-Canadian documentary which alleges that six major chemical companies are
responsible for decades of cancer causing chemicals and pollution, and also develop cancer treatments and
drugs.

It also argues these companies own the most patents on genetically modified crops that have never been tested for long
term health impacts like cancer.

Cures, Health & Wellbeing

Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

 Part Four: Click here

Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/health-wellbeing-4.shtml

Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm

& An Open Letter To Legislators Currently Considering Vaccine Legislation From
Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD In Immunology
July 5 2015 | From: VaccineImpact / ThinkingMomsRevolution

Canadian physician Dr. Andrew Moulden provided clear scientific evidence to prove that every
dose of vaccine given to a child or an adult produces harm. The truth that he uncovered was
rejected by the conventional medical system and the pharmaceutical industry.
Nevertheless, his warning and his message to America remains as a solid legacy of the man who stood up against
big pharma and their program to vaccinate every person on the Earth.

Dr Moulden died unexpectedly in November of 2013 at age 49.

Because of the strong opposition from big pharma concerning Dr. Mouldens research, I became concerned that the name
of this brilliant researcher and his lifes work had nearly been deleted from the internet. His reputation was being
disparaged, and his message of warning and hope was being distorted and buried without a tombstone.

I prepared a series of articles as a tribute to a great physician and as a memorial to a courageous individual who was not
afraid to speak the truth about medical corruption and a flawed healthcare system that does more to harm health than it
does to cure disease.

This is the first in a series of four articles about Dr. Moulden the man, the physician, and the powerful advocate for
ending all vaccine use. In future articles, I will summarize his detailed scientific evidence, which shows how vaccine damage
occurs. I will explain the common mechanisms behind vaccine damage and how vaccines harm the health of everyone who
receives them regardless of whether or not they notice any adverse reactions at the time they take the shots.

Dr. Moulden stated:

" What we have done to each other [with vaccines] has produced the most profound damage to humankind by
humankind in the history of humanity. And the reason why we got here is partly because of:

1. Our arrogance in thinking that we know everything. In physiology and medicine we do not know everything!

2. [Our greed] to advance our own self-interest to make money, to sell products and to advance corporate alliances.
Commercialization has overtaken the fundamental human value of do unto others as you would have others do
unto you.

When society turns toward this human value, then we would all be working together for the greater good of each
other. [However, other values have become more important] I dont care whose feet I step on or how I get there as
long as my American dream is realized. I dont care who has to pay for it on the way of getting there."
Dr. Mouldens Credibility

Was Dr. Moulden a crackpot as some sources claim, or was he a brilliant physician and researcher? This series of articles
will set the record straight, and summarize the contribution that his work has made to medical knowledge.

When I evaluate the credibility of people who are unknown to me, I begin by seeking answers to a few basic questions. For
example: Is this person offering opinion, or can he or she back up the claims with valid science? Does he have educational
credentials? Are there other physicians and scientists who support his or her beliefs and recommendations? Is this person
controlled by the pharmaceutical industry, allopathic medical associations, or the US FDA (US Food and Drug
Administration)? And finally, what do Quackwatch and their friends have to say about the person?

Dr. Moulden had a PhD in Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology. He had a masters degree in child development, and
was also a medical doctor. His work was respected by other researchers who dont march to the drumbeat of the
pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Moulden was a threat to the pharmaceutical industry, and their Quackwatch family of 21
related websites treated him as an enemy.
Resigning from Medical Practice to Testify on Vaccine Safety

Dr. Moulden resigned from his medical practice in 2007 to travel throughout North America delivering the message that
every dose of any and all vaccine types causes harm to those who receive it. He stated:

As many know, I officially quit my medical career in 2007. I did this in order to travel around North America to do
research into vaccine safety and to present my research on vaccine safety across Canada and the United States. I
only spoke the truth. I was not well received."

During those years, he showed that many cases of Shaken Baby Syndrome were actually vaccine-related damage. His
testimony freed many parents from false accusations that they had abused their infants.

Retreat from Public View: Attacks and Death Threats

In 2010 Dr. Moulden disappeared from public view. He stated:

In 2010-11 I returned to my PhD training to complete a full year accredited Clinical Neuropsychology internship at
the Baycrest Center for Geriatric Care in Toronto. During this time I also taught a University course on Health
Medicine at York University in Toronto. I stopped talking about my research and vaccines.

The Public Health Department advocated that I NOT be allowed to return to clinical medicine as they were incensed
by the message (truth) of my lectures and teaching prior to disappearing. The only way I was allowed to return to
organized medicine to work with medical patients was if I signed a contract drawn up by the public health
department which states:

1) I am mentally ill and therefore my research and teachings on vaccine safety were delusional.

2) I am not allowed, whatsoever, to speak or present my research or views on vaccine safety, in public, at all, as a
condition of being allowed to return to clinical medicine, receiving a medical license, and for maintaining that
license."

Even before Dr. Moulden retreated from public view, a group of professional character assassins went to work to destroy his
reputation in any way possible. They published lies and deceptions on the internet and did everything possible to bring him
down. After he retreated, his websites were hacked and access to his teachings was largely destroyed. Yes, there were
even death threats.

The Mysterious Death of Dr. Andrew Moulden

The death of Andrew Moulden is shrouded in mystery. Some sources say he had a heart attack and others say he
committed suicide.
A colleague of Dr. Moulden who wishes to remain anonymous reported to Health Impact News that he/she had contact with
him two weeks before he died in 2013.

Dr. Moulden told our source and a small number of trusted colleagues in October of 2013 that he was about to break his
silence and would be releasing new information that would be a major challenge to the vaccine business of big pharma.

He was ready to come back. Even though he had been silent, he had never stopped his research.

Then, two weeks later, Dr. Moulden suddenly died.

Dr. Moulden was about to release a body of research and treatments, which could have destroyed the vaccine model of
disease management, destroyed a major source of funding for the pharmaceutical industry, and at the same time seriously
damaged the foundation of the germ theory of disease.

Death Threats Against Vaccine Critics are not Unusual

In another case of vaccine damage cover-up, Dr. Garth Nicolson received death threats. He was part of a research team
that became aware of biological warfare testing that was done on prisoners in Texas. The biological warfare agents later
showed up in vaccines that were given to US service personnel during the Persian Gulf Wars. The result was thousands of
cases of Gulf War Syndrome and vaccine-related deaths.

Professor Emeritus Garth L. Nicolson, PhD, is the President, Chief Scientific Officer and Research Professor of Molecular
Pathology at the Institute for Molecular Medicine in Huntington Beach, California, and has taught in medical schools in the
US and Australia. He is one of the most often cited scientists in America today.

Dr. Nicolson explained what happened to him when he and others learned about the Texas prison experiments and the
vaccine damage that occurred among US troops in the Gulf War. He stated:
 We were actually forced to leave Texas. I was an endowed full professor and department chair at the University of
Texas and I literally had to leave Texas because it became too dangerous. Several of my colleagues died.

My boss was shot in the back of the head in his office, because he was going to blow the whistle on the prison
testing experiments. So, it became very dangerous."

Preserving Dr. Mouldens Legacy

The powers who wish to suppress the work of Dr. Moulden have done a very good job of erasing most all of the information
that was once available on the internet. Before it all disappears, I would like to take the time to summarize some of his
teachings.

In this article, and in those that follow, I will condense the key points from the 6 hour video series called Tolerance Lost. At
the moment, this is still available on YouTube.com. The information was given in three videos, which are presented on
YouTube in 51 segments.

If you want to hear Dr. Moulden explain his findings, then I highly recommend spending the time watching his videos. The
images of vascular and brain physiology are very instructive as are the numerous photos of children, Gulf War veterans,
and other adults who display visible signs of vaccine damage.

Listen to Dr. Moulden in his own words give evidence to the mechanisms that cause vaccine damage in Tolerance Lost.
See the evidence of vaccine damage in the faces of children.

Listen to a presentation from Dr. Moulden that summarizes key principles of his Research.

I have also used various other resources for preparing this summary. There are a few transcripts of interviews given by Dr.
Moulden and three chapters from an unfinished book [8] that are still available on the internet. Text was collected and
summarized from all of these sources.

In some cases I needed to do additional research to fill in the details that were not fully explained by Dr. Moulden in these
resources. My independent research also confirmed the facts of blood physiology and neurological functioning that Dr.
Moulden described.

How the Germ Theory of Disease Produced the Vaccine Era

Most people, myself included, were taught that every disease has a single cause. Thus, if we want to prevent that disease,
then all we need to do is eradicate the cause of the disease. Once we do this, then the disease will disappear from the face
of the Earth.
According to this theory, if there is a disease, then there must be a single cause, which could be a bacteria, virus, parasite,
or some type of environmental exposure. We might not understand the process of how a microbe, for example might cause
illness or death, we only need to be reasonably confident that the microbe is associated with the disease.

In other words, germs cause disease and we can stop the spread of infectious diseases through the use of vaccines, which
are supposed to give the body immunity against experiencing disease. In theory, vaccines create a situation in the human
body where exposure to a disease causing pathogen no longer triggers the disease.

The vaccine era that started in earnest in the middle of the 1800s was a direct outgrowth of the belief in the germ theory of
disease. The vaccine movement took a giant leap forward in the late 1950s after the so-called polio epidemic supposedly
threatened the lives of thousands. The high visibility of the epidemic in the media produced great fear, which made
Americans eager to take the polio shot and eat the vaccine-laced sugar cubes as soon as they became available.

We were told that we should be proud of the dedicated researchers and their American ingenuity which led to the creation of
the first polio vaccine in the 1950s. Whether or not the polio vaccine was effective and whether it actually caused more
deaths than would have been caused by the wild polio virus is still hotly argued. But one thing is clear, the marketing of that
vaccine caused Americans to become believers in the health preserving power of vaccines.

Dr. Moulden Rejected the Theory that Modern Diseases are Caused by a Single Agent

Dr. Moulden challenged the single cause germ theory of disease. He, along with a select group of other physicians and
scientists, recognize that we can no longer think in terms of a single germ causing a single disease.
The modern epidemic of syndromes and diseases that began to afflict us in the last half of the twentieth century, and
continues to afflict us today, are the product of multiple causes that work together to bring about disability, disease, and
death. The multiple causes produce multiple illnesses and syndromes.

Many, in fact most all, physicians and scientists still cling to the single cause single disease way of thinking. The
pharmaceutical industry develops its drugs in the same way. Every problem, every illness, every disease can be treated by
a specific substance of their creation. Of course their treatments rarely cure disease, they just treat symptoms. When the
symptoms disappear, then the problem is resolved as far as they are concerned.

Dr. Moulden rejected this way of thinking, because he knew that it was failing to cure people from what ailed them. It was
based on flawed and ineffective medical science. He chose not to stay within the confines of mainstream medical thinking,
but insisted on getting out of the box and looking deeper than most anyone else was willing to look.

People who get out of the box are always criticized, attacked, and threatened by the established order, especially when a
person clearly has more training and expertise than those who are doing the criticizing.

Dr. Moulden had a PhD and a medical degree. His education focused on brain functioning and psychological/behavioral
responses to brain dysfunction. He could see what other people didnt see, because few people had his background or his
tenacity to look beyond conventional medical diagnosis and treatment. He pulled together different aspects of science to
create a comprehensive model of disease, which could explain numerous modern diseases.

Dr. Moulden Could not Ignore the Fact that Vaccines were the Greatest Threat to Human Health

Based on his training and clinical experience, Dr. Moulden could not ignore the fact that vaccines were the greatest threat to
human health in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. He could not ignore it, because it was literally staring him in the
eyes as he looked at the faces of his patients. He could see the evidence of cranial nerve damage caused by vaccines
when he observed the abnormal facial expressions and movements of the eyes of those who had been exposed to
vaccines.

Dr. Moulden was convinced that the widespread use of large numbers of vaccines did not mark the beginning of a new age
of disease-free living, rather they introduced a new era of universal sickness.

Vaccine Damage does not Produce just a Single Symptom

Vaccine damage does not produce just a single symptom; rather the reactions are many and varied. Additionally vaccine
reactions can occur shortly after receiving the injection or they can occur years later. Often, the reactions only become
noticeable after many doses of different vaccines have been given.
The variability in reactions and the unpredictable time frame for reaction gives the pharmaceutical industry and the medical
establishment that they control, the statistical confidence to assert that vaccines do not produce harm. If they dont see a
large number of adverse reactions of a single type within a specific short time period, then they conclude that harm was not
produced.

The US is the #1 in number of vaccines injected into babies prior to age 1 year

We are told that vaccines are so safe, that a child could receive 10,000 vaccines and not have an adverse reaction, yet the
pharmaceutical industry has never done twenty-year longitudinal studies to even measure what happens to children who
receive 69 or more doses of vaccine during the first 18 years of life.

They have not done it and they will not do it, because they know that vaccine damage would be revealed. They also will
never compare the health history of vaccinated children with unvaccinated children. It is estimated that one million children
in the US have not received any vaccinations.

So, it would be easy to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children. But if this was done, the results would prove that
vaccines do in fact cause illness, disability, and death.

Dr. Moulden was convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that vaccines do cause harm. He saw the evidence of disability,
lifelong suffering, and premature death. Those of us who are willing to think outside of the box that has been created by the
pharmaceutical industry accept the fact that vaccine damage represents a broad spectrum of conditions and syndromes,
which can be traced back to vaccine use and exposure to various environmental toxins.

Damage from Vaccines and from Environmental Exposures

Dr. Moulden understood that vaccines were a serious problem, but he also recognized that numerous environmental factors
could also cause modern diseases.
The combination of vaccine use, pesticide exposure, chemicals in food, toxic chemicals in the water and air, to name a few,
are all working together to destroy our health, damage our fertility, and decrease the world population. He also understood
that poor nutrition increased the severity of vaccine reactions.

Primary Mechanisms in Vaccines that Cause Harm

Dr. Moulden identified two primary mechanisms that explain how vaccines and environmental toxins cause the numerous
neurodevelopmental diseases that have spread through the United States, Canada, and other so-called developed
countries. The two components are M.A.S.S. and zeta potential. These will be discussed in detail in the next articles. At this
time I just want to introduce you to M.A.S.S. (Moulden Anoxia Spectrum Syndromes).

The damage to human health that occurs from vaccines and environmental toxins interferes with normal blood flow and
triggers extreme immune system reactions. The result is oxygen deprivation at the microvascular (capillary) level. The
capillaries are the smallest blood vessels in the body. It is estimated that the human body has 600,000 miles of capillaries.

When blood flow is stopped and oxygen is no longer available to cells in certain highly sensitive areas, then cellular damage
and normal body functioning will be damaged. When this happens in the brain and the digestive system, autism and other
neurodevelopmental conditions can develop. Essentially, vaccines, certain environmental toxins, and poor nutrition can
create conditions in which tiny strokes occur in microvascular regions of the body.

Read the full story at: VaccineImpact

An Open Letter to Legislators Currently Considering Vaccine Legislation from Tetyana

Obukhanych, PhD in Immunology

Re: VACCINE LEGISLATION

Dear Legislator:

My name is Tetyana Obukhanych. I hold a PhD in Immunology. I am writing this letter in the hope that it will correct several
common misperceptions about vaccines in order to help you formulate a fair and balanced understanding that is supported
by accepted vaccine theory and new scientific findings.

Do unvaccinated children pose a higher threat to the public than the vaccinated?

It is often stated that those who choose not to vaccinate their children for reasons of conscience endanger the rest of the
public, and this is the rationale behind most of the legislation to end vaccine exemptions currently being considered by
federal and state legislators country-wide. You should be aware that the nature of protection afforded by many modern
vaccines and that includes most of the vaccines recommended by the CDC for children is not consistent with such a
statement.

I have outlined below the recommended vaccines that cannot prevent transmission of disease either because they are
not designed to prevent the transmission of infection (rather, they are intended to prevent disease symptoms), or because
they are for non-communicable diseases. People who have not received the vaccines mentioned below pose no higher
threat to the general public than those who have, implying that discrimination against non-immunized children in a public
school setting may not be warranted.

1. IPV (inactivated poliovirus vaccine) cannot prevent transmission of poliovirus (see appendix for the scientific
study, Item #1). Wild poliovirus has been non-existent in the USA for at least two decades. Even if wild poliovirus were to be
re-imported by travel, vaccinating for polio with IPV cannot affect the safety of public spaces. Please note that wild
poliovirus eradication is attributed to the use of a different vaccine, OPV or oral poliovirus vaccine. Despite being capable of
preventing wild poliovirus transmission, use of OPV was phased out long ago in the USA and replaced with IPV due to
safety concerns.

2. Tetanus is not a contagious disease, but rather acquired from deep-puncture wounds contaminated with C.
tetani spores. Vaccinating for tetanus (via the DTaP combination vaccine) cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is
intended to render personal protection only.

3. While intended to prevent the disease-causing effects of the diphtheria toxin, the diphtheria toxoid vaccine (also
contained in the DTaP vaccine) is not designed to prevent colonization and transmission of C.
diphtheriae. Vaccinating for diphtheria cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is likewise intended for personal
protection only.

4. The acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine (the final element of the DTaP combined vaccine), now in use in the USA,
replaced the whole cell pertussis vaccine in the late 1990s, which was followed by an unprecedented resurgence of
whooping cough. An experiment with deliberate pertussis infection in primates revealed that the aP vaccine is not capable
of preventing colonization and transmission of B. pertussis (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #2). The FDA
has issued a warning regarding this crucial finding.

Furthermore, the 2013 meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors at the CDC revealed additional alarming data
that pertussis variants (PRN-negative strains) currently circulating in the USA acquired a selective advantage to
infect those who are up-to-date for their DTaP boosters (see appendix for the CDC document, Item #3), meaning that
people who are up-to-date are more likely to be infected, and thus contagious, than people who are not vaccinated.

5. Among numerous types of H. influenzae, the Hib vaccine covers only type b. Despite its sole intention to reduce
symptomatic and asymptomatic (disease-less) Hib carriage, the introduction of the Hib vaccine has inadvertently
shifted strain dominance towards other types of H. influenzae (types a through f). These types have been causing
invasive disease of high severity and increasing incidence in adults in the era of Hib vaccination of children (see appendix
for the scientific study, Item #4). The general population is more vulnerable to the invasive disease now than it was prior to
the start of the Hib vaccination campaign. Discriminating against children who are not vaccinated for Hib does not make
any scientific sense in the era of non-type b H. influenzae disease.

6. Hepatitis B is a blood-borne virus. It does not spread in a community setting, especially among children who are
unlikely to engage in high-risk behaviors, such as needle sharing or sex. Vaccinating children for hepatitis B cannot
significantly alter the safety of public spaces. Further, school admission is not prohibited for children who are chronic
hepatitis B carriers. To prohibit school admission for those who are simply unvaccinated and do not even carry hepatitis B
would constitute unreasonable and illogical discrimination.

In summary, a person who is not vaccinated with IPV, DTaP, HepB, and Hib vaccines due to reasons of conscience
poses no extra danger to the public than a person who is. No discrimination is warranted.

How often do serious vaccine adverse events happen?

It is often stated that vaccination rarely leads to serious adverse events. Unfortunately, this statement is not supported by
science. A recent study done in Ontario, Canada, established that vaccination actually leads to an emergency room
visit for 1 in 168 children following their 12-month vaccination appointment and for 1 in 730 children following their
18-month vaccination appointment (see appendix for a scientific study, Item #5).

When the risk of an adverse event requiring an ER visit after well-baby vaccinations is demonstrably so high, vaccination
must remain a choice for parents, who may understandably be unwilling to assume this immediate risk in order to protect
their children from diseases that are generally considered mild or that their children may never be exposed to.

Can discrimination against families who oppose vaccines for reasons of conscience prevent future disease
outbreaks of communicable viral diseases, such as measles?

Measles research scientists have for a long time been aware of the measles paradox. I quote from the article by Poland &
Jacobson (1994) Failure to Reach the Goal of Measles Elimination: Apparent Paradox of Measles Infections in
Immunized Persons. Arch Intern Med 154:1815-1820:

The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes
a disease of immunized persons.

Further research determined that behind the measles paradox is a fraction of the population called LOW VACCINE
RESPONDERS. Low-responders are those who respond poorly to the first dose of the measles vaccine. These individuals
then mount a weak immune response to subsequent RE-vaccination and quickly return to the pool of susceptibles within
2-5 years, despite being fully vaccinated.

Re-vaccination cannot correct low-responsiveness: it appears to be an immuno-genetic trait. The proportion of low-
responders among children was estimated to be 4.7% in the USA.

Studies of measles outbreaks in Quebec, Canada, and China attest that outbreaks of measles still happen, even when
vaccination compliance is in the highest bracket (95-97% or even 99%, see appendix for scientific studies, Items #6&7).
This is because even in high vaccine responders, vaccine-induced antibodies wane over time. Vaccine immunity does not
equal life-long immunity acquired after natural exposure.

It has been documented that vaccinated persons who develop breakthrough measles are contagious. In fact, two major
measles outbreaks in 2011 (in Quebec, Canada, and in New York, NY) were re-imported by previously vaccinated
individuals.

Taken together, these data make it apparent that elimination of vaccine exemptions, currently only utilized by a
small percentage of families anyway, will neither solve the problem of disease resurgence nor prevent re-
importation and outbreaks of previously eliminated diseases.

Is discrimination against conscientious vaccine objectors the only practical solution?

The majority of measles cases in recent US outbreaks (including the recent Disneyland outbreak) are adults and very young
babies, whereas in the pre-vaccination era, measles occurred mainly between the ages 1 and 15. Natural exposure to
measles was followed by lifelong immunity from re-infection, whereas vaccine immunity wanes over time, leaving adults
unprotected by their childhood shots. Measles is more dangerous for infants and for adults than for school-aged children.

Despite high chances of exposure in the pre-vaccination era, measles practically never happened in babies much younger
than one year of age due to the robust maternal immunity transfer mechanism.

The vulnerability of very young babies to measles today is the direct outcome of the prolonged mass vaccination campaign
of the past, during which their mothers, themselves vaccinated in their childhood, were not able to experience measles
naturally at a safe school age and establish the lifelong immunity that would also be transferred to their babies and protect
them from measles for the first year of life.

Luckily, a therapeutic backup exists to mimic now-eroded maternal immunity. Infants as well as other vulnerable or
immunocompromised individuals, are eligible to receive immunoglobulin, a potentially life-saving measure that
supplies antibodies directed against the virus to prevent or ameliorate disease upon exposure (see appendix, Item
#8).

In summary:

1) due to the properties of modern vaccines, non-vaccinated individuals pose no greater risk of transmission of
polio, diphtheria, pertussis, and numerous non-type b H. influenzae strains than vaccinated individuals do, non-
vaccinated individuals pose virtually no danger of transmission of hepatitis B in a school setting, and tetanus is
not transmissible at all;

2) there is a significantly elevated risk of emergency room visits after childhood vaccination appointments
attesting that vaccination is not risk-free; 3) outbreaks of measles cannot be entirely prevented even if we had
nearly perfect vaccination compliance; and 4) an effective method of preventing measles and other viral diseases
in vaccine-ineligible infants and the immunocompromised, immunoglobulin, is available for those who may be
exposed to these diseases.

Taken together, these four facts make it clear that discrimination in a public school setting against children who
are not vaccinated for reasons of conscience is completely unwarranted as the vaccine status of conscientious
objectors poses no undue public health risk.

Sincerely Yours,

~ Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD

Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD, is the author of the book Vaccine Illusion. She has studied immunology in some of the worlds
most prestigious medical institutions. She earned her PhD in Immunology at the Rockefeller University in New York and did
postdoctoral training at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA and Stanford University in California.

Dr. Obukhanych offers online classes for those who want to gain deeper understanding of how the immune system works
and whether the immunologic benefits of vaccines are worth the risks: Natural Immunity Fundamentals.

To read the Appendix for this article at the source, click here.
Proposal To Temporarily Sterilise All New Zealand Teenage Females Should Raise
Serious Red Flags
June 24 2015 | From: LeadingEdge / NewZealandHerald

Yesterday the NZ media featured coverage of a new proposal that has been put forward by two
senior academics from the University of Otago, who would like to see all young New Zealand
females temporarily sterilised with long-acting chemical contraceptive implants.

In their ideal vision for the future of New Zealand young people, these academics would like temporary sterilisation
to be the default policy that young girls would have to deliberately be opted out of if they didnt want their new and
still-developing fertility to be chemically shut down for months or years at a time.

Related: Schools Implant IUDs in Girls as Young as 6th Grade Without Their Parents Knowing

No, this is not the plot of some dystopian novel or film, this really is a policy that a couple of NZ academics apparently now
seriously consider to be a good idea.

To put things mildly: there is a lot to be concerned about with this proposal.

Eugenics and population control anyone?

Firstly, these academics dont seemed to have considered the possible impacts that temporarily sterilising an entire
population of females from a very young age could have.

As far as I am aware, no attempt at the population-wide temporary sterilisation of very young females, whose physiology is
still new and still developing, has ever been attempted meaning that the outcome of such an experimental scheme is totally
unknown.

We are talking here about synthetic hormonal interference with the female fertility system while that system is still very young
and developing, and there is no reliable way of knowing how such interference could turn out (for all of us) in the long-run.
We already know that chemical contraceptives are an environmental pollutant that end up in waterways, and from there
cause harms to wildlife populations. Imagine how devastating this environmental impact could become if every female in NZ
was temporarily sterilised with these agents at a young age?

Then there are the eugenic memories from recent history that make mass sterilisation (even if it is reversible) a very
unpalatable idea for most people today the Nazis experimented with ways of trying to sterilise entire female Jewish
populations, and in Apartheid South-Africa a similar sterilisation scheme was attempted on Black Africans.

Then there were the forced sterilisations of those considered to be defective that took place in the United States of
America prior to, and after World War II not to mention those that took place in other parts of the world as well last century.

I think people are right to be extremely wary of any attempt to introduce any sort of mass sterilisation programmes even
temporary chemical sterilisations because these can very easily morph into state-mandated sterilisation programmes for
economic or social reasons (the old saying: absolute power corrupts absolutely is still as true today as it was the day when
it was first uttered.)

And none of this even touches on the negative impact that synthetic hormonal contraceptives can have on female health and
wellbeing, or the fact that such a scheme would not actually do anything to alleviate the far more serious problem of sexually
transmitted diseases.

(By the way, I hoped everyone took notice of the fact that these academics have rightly pointed out that condoms have a
failure rate of 18% per annum (thats 18 pregnancies per year, for every 100 couples using condoms) which makes
condoms only 4% more effective than the woefully unreliable withdrawal method! This is important, because pregnancy can
only occur for a very limited window each month (due to the way that female fertility works). Sexually transmitted diseases,
on the other hand, can be transmitted 24/7 meaning that condoms are a far less reliable form of protection against sexual
disease than some people wrongly believe and tout them to be.)

I think that most people are rightly very concerned by this proposal for the automatic temporary sterilisation of all young New
Zealand females and for lots of very good reasons.

For me, one of the most troubling aspects of this proposal is the way in which it so flippantly treats normal healthy female
fertility as if it were something that needs to be shut down or medicated against like we would a disease, or some other
physiological problem.
At the end of the day, this proposal would actually create far more social problems, and expose us to far more risks and
unknown factors than we are currently experiencing in this country which is precisely why I think that it is one of the worst
health policy proposals that has been mooted in this country in quite some time.

EPA Knew Electro-Magnetic Fields (EMFs) Were A Probable Human Carcinogen

Decades Ago And Covered It Up
July 1 2015 | From: ActivistPost

Did you know that back in 1990, the Environmental Protection Agency was all set to release a
report that admitted electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are dangerous to our health, including that
EMFs have been linked with the development of various cancers but stopped short of straight up
admitting they are probable carcinogens?

Isnt it ironic the newspaper thought to tack a Radio Shack add onto the end of this article?
The clipping, published in the October 4, 1990 edition of The Indiana Gazette, reported:

Now the Environmental Protection Agency is on the verge of publishing a report suggesting that EMF is linked with
the development of various cancers. And at one point, someone within the agency had considered an even more
drastic step - classifying low-frequency electromagnetic fields as probable cancer-causing agents in the same rank
as dioxin or PCBs.

Wow. They were all set to classify low frequency EMFs in the same rank as dioxin, a highly dangerous chemical thought by
some even today to be among the most toxic substances out there. Continuing:

But the EPA has stopped short of the probable carcinogen conclusion, which could have drastic implications for
regulation of the American utility industry and in the workplace. Louis Slesin, power-industry watchdog and the
 editor of Microwave News, published in his journals most recent issue a paragraph from a rough draft of the EPA
study recommending that low-frequency electromagnetic fields be classified as probable human carcinogens.

The paragraph, Slesin said in a recent interview with The Morning Call, has since been deleted from the report,
which wont be issued in official, final form until this month, according to the July 20 issue of TIME magazine.

According to Microwave News, the paragraph was deleted after the EPA presented its initial draft of report to the
White House Office of Policy and Development."

Isnt that nice? Guess the megacorporations who run the government were none too pleased that the truth might come out
about the harmful effects of EMFs and what that information might do to bottom lines and what was about grow into a
booming business that would essentially take over our entire world in the next thirty years.

Keep in mind this is from 1990, well before every single one of us was bathing in EMFs all day long from Wi-Fi hotspots, cell
phones, computers, iPads, and a thousand other smart devices Well before there were millions of antennas popping up
all over the country on school buildings and playgrounds, in church steeples, on our water towers, all along our roadways

The Internet of Things isnt even fully implemented yet, but now we already live in a world that has smart pajamas for small
children which are encoded so they can be scanned with smart devices that will then read bedtime stories to them over Wi-
Fi.

The reason Slesin ended up with the original draft of the report, by the way, is that the EPA staffer in the office of research
and development for the report who was overruled on the probable carcinogen finding turned whistleblower after they took
the paragraph out and leaked the original draft to Microwave News.
At the time the Gazette article was printed, the report did, however, retain information regarding the fact that epidemiological
studies of brain tumors, lymphomas, and leukemias showed a causal link with EMFs, though no concrete link was admitted
obviously.

In addition, the article goes on to note that extremely low EMFs inhibit the production of the tumor-suppressing hormone
melatonin and that these fields have also been known to inhibit the immune system.

The point is, even back then, they knew. They knew how dangerous this was to our health, and they failed to fully
inform the public.

Now look where we are.

(For more on how you can protect yourself and your family from dangerous EMF, this guide is a quick read that breaks it all
down easily and gives some great tips for reducing your exposure.)

Antidepressants Arent Needed Most Of The Time

June 27 2015 | From: BestHealthNutritionals

Shocking report reveals psych drugs have a 98 percent failure rate

Heres a revolutionary idea: Lets stop giving people dangerous drugs that dont work.

I know that sounds like plain old common sense, and so obvious that no one should even have to suggest it.

But common sense flew out the window long ago. Today, countless people are being drugged with dangerous pills they
never needed in the first place. And millions are paying the ultimate price, according to a damning new report.

The analysis, published in BMJ, found that more than half a million Americans and Europeans die needlessly each year
because of unnecessary psychiatric drugs. And a shocking 98 percent of the patients given antidepressant, attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder and dementia drugs dont actually need them.

Which means, of course, that a measly 2 percent of the people who are handed heavy-duty psych drugs,
could actually benefit from them. The rest are unknowingly taking unnecessary risks including the ultimate risk of all,
death.

There have been persistent links between antidepressants and suicide, which the drug industry has tried its best to
downplay. But the new editorial from a leading Cochrane researcher reports the risk is not only real, but there have been 15
times more suicides among antidepressant users than reported by the FDA.

And at a 98 percent failure rate it should come as no surprise that most of the drugs were only approved in the first place
because of studies so rigged they could sail the Pacific.

Patients recruited for studies of psychotropic drugs are often already on other meds. To participate in the study, theyre taken
off those drugs for a washout period and suffer withdrawal as a result.

The new drug thats being tested is then given and, naturally, it eases the terrible withdrawal, so the patient of course reports
feeling better. On paper, that looks like a solid victory for the drug.

In reality, all the drug did was feed the urge for medication.

And when drugs do actually beat placebos, its often not by much. In some cases, patients on a placebo report the same
benefits just a few days later.

Unfortunately, as revealing as it is the new report still falls short. It fails to mention that many people battling so-called
psychiatric problems can get the help they need from nondrug therapies such as natural remedies, homeopathic medicine
and good nutrition.

Brain friendly nutrients such as fish oil, 5-htp and B vitamins could give you the boost you need. And herbal interventions,
such as roseroot have been proven to be effective, as well.
In other cases, detoxification treatments and hormone therapies are what are called for. Work closely with a holistic medical
doctor who can offer you real solutions - NOT deadly drugs.

These Workers Have A New Demand: Stop Watching Us

June 22 2015 | From: TheNation

How workplace surveillance has become a menace to 'health and safety'.

Four years ago, I was out jogging with an old friend when she told me a puzzling story: Her longtime UPS driver had
just reappeared after more than a monthlong absence. Hed been hospitalized for stress, she told me.

Stress? How stressful could that job be? So I asked to meet him.

Over coffee, the deliveryman, whom Ill call Bill (he asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation from the company),
explained that United Parcel Service had been upgrading its systems for tracking employees. Now the truck he drove was
full of sensors.

They reported when he opened the bulkhead door. When he backed up. When his foot was on the brake. When he was
idling. When he buckled his safety belt. A high-resolution stream of data, including all that information and his GPS
coordinates, flowed back to the UPS offices. The system is called telematics.

With more than 15 years on the job, Bill already knew how to follow classic UPS protocols, with names that sounded like
dogma from a productivity-worshipping cult: The Five Seeing Habits, The Ten-Point Commentary, The 340 Methods.

Guidelines derived from time-and-motion studies told him the most efficient way to do everything: how to handle
his ignition key, which shirt pocket to use for his pen (right-handed people should use the left pocket, and vice
versa), how to pick a walk path from the truck, and how to occupy time while riding in an elevator.

But telematics ratcheted up that pressure. Now drivers were called to account for a litany of small sins. They were asked to
justify bathroom breaks and any other deviations - stealing time in corporate-speak - that could chip away at their SPORH
(pronounced spoor) count, or Stops Per On-Road Hour.

I have no problem doing a heavy, hard job, Bill told me. But now, after you do the job, you have to look back
every day and say, Did I do this? Did I do that? They have a report that tells them everything that you did wrong.

For instance, if you turned the truck on before you put on your seat belt, thats wasting gas.

For UPS, whose revenues topped $58 billion in 2014, tracking worker productivity goes straight to the bottom line. Time is
money, and management knows exactly how much:

Just one minute per driver per day over the course of a year adds up to $14.5 million, the companys senior
director of process management, Jack Levis, told NPR last year.

He appeared on a boosterish episode of the Planet Money podcast titled:

The Future of Work Looks Like a UPS Truck.

Levis and other UPS executives have a favorite quip:

Weve moved from a trucking company that has technology to basically a technology company that just happens to
have trucks.

But UPS trucks arent driven by robots - at least not yet - and of the 10 current and former drivers Ive interviewed, all felt like
they were handling packages in the Panopticon.

Data is just a proxy for control, said Sam Dwyer, 26, a former screenwriter and marketing-industry analyst who
spent eight months as a driver last year.

A current driver, who also asked to remain anonymous for fear of getting fired, said:

Its like youre fighting for your job every day. They harass you: Why did it take you 10 minutes here? Why did it
take you this long there? They want you to hate your job and quit so they can hire somebody at half the pay.

The metrics-based harassment of workers is common, said Tim Sylvester, the president of Teamsters Local 804, when I
visited his Long Island City union hall in March. He told the tale of one UPS driver, Domenick DeDomenico, who spent 10
days in a coma after getting hit by a car while delivering packages.

A year later, after surgery and extensive physical therapy, DeDomenico was back on the job. When the tracking data
indicated that hed dipped below his pre-accident delivery rate of 13.23 packages per hour, managers threatened to fire him,
DeDomenico said at a union rally.

Some UPS supervisors post printouts of drivers data every day to keep up the pressure. Guys get scared, said Josh
Pomeranz, Local 804s in-house counsel. They start cutting corners. According to Pomeranz, knee and back surgeries are
very common among UPS workers. One driver lodged a protest by posting a telematics-inspired parody of Santa Claus Is
Coming to Town on YouTube. (Sample lyrics: He sees you when youre driving. He knows when youre on break!)

Job stress is a popular topic on BrownCafe, an independent chat board for UPS workers. In two separate forum threads,
when some members referred to apparent driver suicides in Atlanta, Georgia, and Paris, Tennessee, others began talking
about management pressures. In September, when a recently fired UPS deliveryman in Birmingham shot two supervisors to
death before killing himself, forum members speculated about the role played by a pressure-driven corporate culture.
 It was just a matter of time before somebody went ballistic, wrote one.

Another added: We are people, damn it, not some stupid metric.

How did we get here? A mere 48 years ago, on his weekly program The Twenty-First Century, Walter Cronkite proclaimed:

Technology is opening a new world of leisure time. One government report projects that by the year 2000, the
United States will have a 30-hour workweek and monthlong vacations as the rule.

Machines, many people thought, would lift the yoke of labor from humanitys shoulders. A Time magazine essay predicted
that:

by 2000, the machines will be producing so much that everyone in the U.S. will, in effect, be independently
wealthy.

The pundits had one thing right: Advances in technology did increase national productivity. In the three decades following
World War II, productivity and hourly wages grew roughly in tandem, by 97 percent and 91 percent, respectively.

Then they were decoupled: Workers produced steadily more and earned proportionally less. From 1973 to 2013, while
output rose 74 percent, the average workers pay rose just 9 percent, according to a January report from the Economic
Policy Institute (EPI);

All the productivity gains have been harvested and turned into corporate profits, explained Michael Childers, the
director of the School for Workers at the University of Wisconsin.

CEOs now make 296 times as much as the typical worker, according to the EPI; a half-century ago, they made only 20 times
as much.

Likewise, after-tax corporate profits hit their highest level on record as a share of the GDP in 2013, even as workers salaries
and wages hit their lowest level.

UPS demonstrates perfectly how technology now governs the US workplace. Metrics enable management by stress, said
Childers. Two years ago, he met workers who were processing insurance claims at a Pennsylvania call center, where
managers monitored every conversation and keystroke.

They used that data to discipline employees, he said, constantly urging more speed;

If you get a few calls where people speak slowly in a row, you know youre going to hear about it next
week,Childers recounted.

Always in the back of your mind as a worker is, Oh my God, I wish this person would talk faster.
 The workers anxiety and exhaustion were palpable: You had 20-year employees quitting, people throwing up in
the parking lot.

In the winter of 2013, Reynalda Cruz, 42, took a job as a FedEx warehouse temp in Edison, New Jersey. She was issued a
computerized package scanner and told to strap it to her right forearm. But the weight of the device became unbearable, she
said.

As she reached repeatedly for boxes that were above her chest level, stacking them on pallets and then wrapping them in
plastic, her arm grew inflamed. Coworkers told her this was normal. They counseled her to take a Tylenol or Motrin.

Meanwhile, her data-gathering wrist scanner had registered a troubling trend: Her pace was dropping. When supervisors
confronted Cruz, she told them she was in constant pain. The same device that was tracking her speed was inhibiting it,
too. They urged her to pick it up, she said.

At the beginning, when they put it on my armI said, Oh, wow! But after the hours went by, I saw this really
wasnt good for me at all, she recalled, speaking in Spanish through an interpreter.

How is it human beings can end up working like this? They were measuring our time, our production, as if we were
robots. Today, Cruz is an organizer for New Labor, a nonprofit advocacy group representing immigrant workers in
New Jersey.

Laura Graham was a seasonal worker last year in Coffeyville, Kansas, at one of the infamous Amazon warehouses. She
was born in 1965, when the techno-utopian dream was ascendant, but the workplace she describes, like Cruzs warehouse,
is the inverse of those earlier predictions.

Every time she scanned a piece of merchandise, another countdown began on her screen, indicating how many seconds
she had to reach the next item, as if shed graduated to the next level in a video game. Her progress toward hourly goals
was also tracked.

When an accidental trip down a wrong aisle left her more than five minutes behind, a supervisor arrived to scold her.
Grahams body rebelled against the demands of the device, which directed how she walked from 10 to 20 miles a day on
concrete in the 915,000-square-foot complex for $11.25 an hour.

Theres nothing to describe the misery, physically, she said. I started getting these really sharp pains through my
archesit ended up being plantar fasciitis.

Putting new insoles in her shoes didnt help. To cope, she took two ibuprofen tablets halfway through the graveyard shift,
which ran from 5:30 pm to 3:30 am, and another two at the end. On days off, she tried to keep from using her feet, lying in
bed except for visits to the bathroom or shower.
Amazon and UPS, two of the most successful companies in the United States, both use technology to drive their workers
hard. But theres a big difference: UPS has a union. Amazon does not. As a result, UPS drivers make a decent wage -
$18.75 an hour to start, rising to $32 after four years on the job - and can negotiate for protections.

In May 2011, Teamsters across the country began wearing stickers on which UPS stood for Unfair Production Standards.
This was four months before Bill broke into a cold sweat on the job, couldnt breathe, and was rushed to the hospital in the
throes of his first panic attack.

While the Teamsters contract with UPS has a clause stipulating that workers cant be disciplined based on telematics data
alone, a gaping loophole in that agreement - its invalid in cases of worker dishonesty, although the contract doesnt specify
what such cases may include - renders such protections toothless.

Local 804 representatives said theyd hoped to see more robust language added in the last round of contract negotiations
between UPS and the Teamsters, but it didnt happen.

Meanwhile, the pressure to produce more and faster keeps intensifying. Some UPS employees and union reps told me
about the tricks workers use to keep up. Drivers have been known to sit on top of already-fastened seat belts to save time.
(Recently, theyve been getting busted for that, however, since sensors can tell if a seat belt hasnt been unbuckled at a
delivery stop.)

In one warehouse in Queens, they said, a safety shut-off mechanism had been disabled - someone taped a reflector against
the electric eye tracking the conveyor belt - because it meant fewer false alarms stopping production.

And workers are not looking forward to the arrival of a new routing system for drivers - called On-Road Integrated
Optimization and Navigation, or ORION - that UPS is rolling out across the country. The company claims it will cut mileage
and save $300 million annually. Teamsters elsewhere in the country have called it telematics on steroids. They worry that
its a new way to erode workers earning power by dumbing down - or deskilling - the job to make them expendable.

If workers are to prevent companies from turning their workplaces into Panopticons, and firing them based on increasingly
inflexible metrics, they will have to organize around new types of demands. That means bargaining for very narrow language
about what kind of data may be gathered - from e-mail to phone recordings and GPS movements - and setting clear
boundaries on how employers can use such information. It also means setting times and places that are off-limits.

This will be a challenge, because unions themselves are under attack. In March, Wisconsin became the 25th right-to-work
state, enacting anti-union legislation that critics have aptly nicknamed right-to-work-for-less. Legislators in Missouri and
New Mexico may follow suit. In November, a settlement with the National Labor Relations Board required Amazon to post
notices in its warehouses stating that employees are free to unionize.

When I asked Laura Graham if she planned to work another holiday season there, she said yes. Shes applying to one of the
companys warehouses in Texas - a right-to-work state since 1993 - and expects her experience as a seasonal worker to be
pretty much the same as last time.

A big part of it for me, and the reason I can go back, is psychological: I know Im only going to be there for two
months, she said. Ill be miserable for two months, and then just call it a day.

Former Salesman For Vaccine Maker Merck & Co. Would Not Vaccinate His Son
June 21 2015 | From: StopMandatoryVaccination

Former Vaccine Salesman Refuses to Vaccinate His Son.If you believe what you are told by the
AMA and the CDC and your doctor, youre not doing enough research.

In 1991 Scott Cooper and his wife researched vaccine safety and efficacy, determined vaccines are NOT safe or
effective, and refused to vaccinate their son. Interestingly, their son was much healthier than his vaccinated peers
throughout childhood.

At the time, Scott worked as a sales rep for Merck & Co., a large vaccine manufacturer, and he had dived deep into
researching vaccines and the risk associated with vaccination.

His Pediatrician was befuddled that Scott would not vaccinate, especially because he worked for a large vaccine
manufacturer! His son continues to be healthy, and Scott and his wife have no regrets about not vaccinating their son.
Bombshell Secret Documents Show Monsanto Knew About Glyphosate Link To
Cancer Over 35 Years Ago
+ How You Can Have Yourself Tested For Glyphosate Contamination
June 20 2015 | From: AllHealthWorks / FeedTheWorld

Research Scientist Dr. Anthony Samsel has a long history of studying the damaging effects of
glyphosate, the main ingredient in Monsantos Roundup, on the human body.

Hes previously worked with Dr. Stephanie Seneff, who released the dire warning that as many as half of all U.S.
children could be autistic by 2025 (in large part due to glyphosate exposure), and has linked the chemical to serious
health problems originating in the gut bacteria.

Recently, Samsels work led him to a place few have ever gone before: inside the pages of files containing safety tests on
glyphosate that had been sealed away since 1981 as a Trade Secret by the request of the Monsanto Company.

Dr. Samsel was able to get the EPA to finally unseal these secret files, which contain information the public was never meant
to see (at least according to Monsanto).

And while Samsel is legally not allowed to show anyone else the files, he is allowed to share his thoughts on them, as well
as information that could implicate the company in a cancer cover-up of epic proportions.
Samsel sat down for an interview with journalist Tony Mitra; you can hear the bombshell interview in the video below.

A Disturbing Pattern of Cancer, Long Before the WHO Knew

Recently the World Health Organization weighed in on the safety of glyphosate, calling it a probable human carcinogen in a
study that made world headlines, and added up to a PR nightmare for Monsanto.

But according to the files obtained by Samsel, these effects, and perhaps ever worse effects in general, were known by
Monsanto decades ago.

In the bombshell video below, Samsel is interviewed by journalist Tony Mitra about what he found - shocking evidence that
showed significant incidences of cell tumors of the tests and tumor growth in multiple organs and tissues in lab animals, for
starters.

Glyphosate: How you can have yourself tested for Glyphosate contamination
Feed the World has set up the first ever validated glyphosate testing (LC/MS/MS) for the general public
worldwide, which will be provided in the U.S. with the support of the Organic Consumers Association
(OCA).

If you live in the U.S. and would like to test your urine, breast milk or tap water for glyphosate contamination please
order and pay for the test in the form below.

If you live outside the U.S. you can send your urine or tap water samples (not breast milk) to the U.S. for testing,
however our aim is to form partnerships with labs in your country to enable our validated testing to be made
available to you at a cheaper price.

Other disturbing findings within these secret files include evidence that glyphosate enters bone marrow almost immediately,
which prevents the formation of new cells in living organisms.

In fact, in every single instance, Samsel noticed a higher incidence of adenomas (benign tumors) and carcinomas
(cancerous tumors that begin in outer tissues).
In other words according to Samsel, Monsanto knew that glyphosate caused cancer 35 years ago according to these files,
and the truth is just now coming out.

In in the interview below (just under 20 minutes) with Mitra, Samsel discusses his findings, and makes the case for why
Monsantos Roundup should not be merely considered a probable carcinogen, but an unequivocal carcinogen.

Samsel is legally bound not to show the documents to anyone, but he is allowed to say how he feels about them:

For more from Mitra you can subscribe to his Youtube Channel by clicking here. He also just released part two of his
interview with Samsel which can be seen below.

Shocker: The Dangers Of Ultrasound

June 19 2015 | From: JonRappoport

Jim West has released his unprecedented Bibliography of critical ultrasound research, as a book,
available at Amazon.com. Ultrasound is a highly controversial topic. It can now be said, without
hyperbole, that an understanding of its mysteries are essential to the well-being of the individual
and the human species.
The word ultrasound commonly refers to diagnostic ultrasound, an acoustic technology utilized to view images of
the fetus in real time, its position within the mother, and to view the mothers reproductive organs. It is an economic
boon to medical practitioners who advocate its routine use.

Related: Human Studies Condemn Ultrasound

Every time Jim West releases a new finding, it is a revelation. Some years ago, I wrote this about Jim:

I always find it riveting to come across an independent investigator who is breaking new ground, against all odds.
Jim West is such a person. His meticulous analysis of West Nile Disease [in fact caused by toxic pollution, not a
virus] has turned the establishment on its head. We should all thank him for his work.

If I were the king of Pulitzers, I would give him a dozen. He is what truly deep reporting is all about. In a sane world,
his revelations would bring about the firing of scores of so-called medical journalists and disease researchers, and
he would be sitting at the top of the heap not in order to exercise arbitrary power, but simply because he has
trumped the lazy and the incompetent and the lying professionals who are supposed to tell us what is going on.

There are many other things I could say in praise of Jims work. Instead, Ill present an excerpt from the notice of his new
book. Its a book you should have and read. Its a book that should receive wide notice. Its a book that should change
standard medical practice. Its a book that can save many lives.

Press Release 5/15/2015

Press Release link: http://harvoa.org/chs/pr

Contact: http://harvoa.org/chs/ ; pub at harvoa dot org

Book Sales: http://amazon.com/dp/B00X06QDYS

Prenatal Ultrasound: A New Bibliography of Human Studies Conducted in Modern China

Jim West has released his unprecedented Bibliography of critical ultrasound research, as a book, available at Amazon.com.

Ultrasound is a highly controversial topic. It can now be said, without hyperbole, that an understanding of its mysteries are
essential to the well-being of the individual and the human species.

The word ultrasound commonly refers to diagnostic ultrasound, an acoustic technology utilized to view images of the fetus
in real time, its position within the mother, and to view the mothers reproductive organs. It is an economic boon to medical
practitioners who advocate its routine use.

Diagnostic ultrasound is widely declared to be harmless to the fetus (*), despite some mothers describing via online forums
such as The Thinking Mothers Revolution, vaginal bleeding and pain, and others describing every detail related to
ultrasound and pharmaceutical or vaccine associated damage to their child. Ultrasound is now being applied to most of the
entire world population during its fetal stage. The health implications are vast in terms of physical and psychological health
for the individual and society.

(*) See: Fetal Ultrasound, John Hopkins Medicine Health Library.

Ultrasound appears to have set the human specie on a tragic path, due to the subtle and not-so-subtle effects of ultrasound
exposure. Critics argue, for example, that the exponential rise in autism incidence is a product of fetal exposure to
ultrasound. If they are correct, then it may take many generations to recover from this misguided application of medical
technology.

Technical History:

Ultrasound imaging technology for diagnostic examinations evolved from a type of echo-imaging, originally developed as
SONAR, a technology invented to detect submarines by pinging sound waves off the submarine hull and electronically
measuring the echo, the duration required to reflect ultrasound from the submarine hull back to the source of the ultrasound.

In the medical field, ultrasound has been in use for many decades, employed to generate echo images of the fetus.
Ultrasound is not ordinary sound, however.

It is a highly unusual form of sound when used for the purpose of prenatal or obstetric diagnostic examinations. Humans
ordinarily are capable of hearing sounds in the range of 20 to 20,000 cycles per second (hertz). Ultrasound for fetal
examination carries a frequency in the range of 3 to 9 megahertz, millions of cycles per second, above the EMF frequencies
of the AM radio band.

Ultrasound imaging technology has supplanted, to an extent, the earlier imaging technology, X-rays. That older technology is
now known publicly to be hazardous, to be carcinogenic, however, it took decades for this knowledge to become public. The
history of medical X-ray imaging may be a parallel for ultrasound history. X-rays were previously known to be a risk though
continuously advocated as harmless by the medical profession.

Hazards Unconfirmed:

Ultrasound is known to have the potential to produce harmful biological effects in the fetus. This has been found via animal
and cell studies. However, these hazards have supposedly not been confirmed by human studies. Funding for ultrasound
studies has virtually disappeared since the late 1980s. despite the FDA raising ultrasound intensity limits in 1991.

Cibull et al (2013) provides definitive assurance.

Although laboratory studies have shown that diagnostic levels of ultrasound can produce physical effects in tissue,
there is no evidence from human studies of a causal relationship between diagnostic ultrasound exposure during
pregnancy and adverse biological effects to the fetus.

- Sarah L. Cibull, BS, Gerald R. Harris, PhD, and Diane M. Nell, PhD. Trends in Diagnostic Ultrasound Acoustic
Output From Data Reported to the US Food and Drug Administration for Device Indications That Include Fetal
Applications. J Ultrasound Med 32 (2013): 192132.
Confirmed in China:

Unknown to Western scientists, the hazards of ultrasound have been confirmed in China since the late 1980s, where
thousands of women, volunteering for abortion, thousands of maternal-fetal pairs, were exposed to carefully controlled
diagnostic ultrasound and the abortive matter then analyzed via laboratory techniques.

From these human studies, Professor Ruo Feng, of Nanjing University, published guidelines in 2000:

Commercial or educational fetal ultrasound imaging should be strictly eliminated. Ultrasound for the identification of
fetal sex and fetal entertainment imaging should be strictly eliminated. For the best early pregnancy, avoid
ultrasound.

Feng is very clear. He is also gentle. He could have written bluntly, For a lesser quality pregnancy, use ultrasound. He
could have written fetus or child instead of pregnancy.

A New Bibliography:

An unprecedented Bibliography of Chinese ultrasound studies by Jim West, is now available, published as a book with
commentary, illustrative graphs and tables. This is a presentation of arcana, i.e., vitally important but unknown scientific
studies. The title is, 50 Human Studies Indicate Extreme Risk for Prenatal Ultrasound: A New Bibliography.

This is the most important bibliography and commentary ever compiled for the field of ultrasound criticism, though for legal
reasons, its conclusions and implications should be suspended, pending trustworthy authoritative review.

The book presents human studies conducted in modern China, which examine the results of in utero fetal exposure to
diagnostic ultrasound. They far exceed Western science in terms of technical sophistication, era relevancy, volume of work,
and number of subjects. They bring empirical evidence for ultrasound hazards.

These studies involve the exposure of over 2,700 maternal-fetal pairs to diagnostic ultrasound. The number of scientists
involved are approximately 100. Pregnant women were carefully selected and then exposed to controlled ultrasound
sessions. Ethical concerns were carefully observed. Abortive matter was examined via state-of-the-art technology, e.g.,
electron microscopy, flow cytometry, and various biochemical analysis (immuno- and histo-). The results were compared
against the results of sham-exposed pregnant women (exposed at zero intensity).

Chinese scientists measured damage to the brain, kidney, cornea, chorionic villi, and the immune system. They determined
the amount of ultrasound exposure required to produce damage to the human fetus, and that amount was found to be very
low. Ultrasound hazards to the human fetus were confirmed without doubt.

Western scientists had previously found hazards via animal and cell studies, however, their findings were deemed
inconclusive because they were not confirmed by human studies.

Human studies can be of two types:

1) epidemiological studies, i.e., population reviews, and,

2) in utero exposure studies, where abortive matter is evaluated in a laboratory following diagnostic ultrasound exposure to
the fetus in the mother.

Western scientists have conducted only a few epidemiological studies, and virtually no human exposure studies.
Epidemiological studies are complex, have many statistical variables, and are thus highly vulnerable to biased interpretation.
They are often published as moot or statistically insignificant, despite finding patterns of ultrasound damage.

Due to abortion ethics, in utero exposure studies were virtually banned in the Western realm. Within the entire world
population, the medical industry has not reported one case of human damage. Thereby, without certain proof, authorities
continued on with the assumption that humans were resistant to ultrasound toxicity.
The Chinese studies were unknown in the Western realm and little known even in the East. These represent 23 years of
critical research, from 1988 to 2011. Unfortunately, these studies were overwhelmed by a tremendous flood of studies that
promote medical and therapeutic innovations for ultrasound.

The Chinese studies have remained disconnected from the Western realm, beyond discussion outside of China, being the
casualty of cultural and language gaps, and lacking a benefit for industry.

These studies are not generally available through global search engines or medical databases. Even if a researcher knew
the titles, the studies would not be found, however, they are available through internal links within the Chinese databases.

The Research Path:

As of 2013, Jim West began his research out of frustration. He had experienced the impossibilities of discussion whenever
the topic of ultrasound hazards was attempted, even with his nearest friends. He always brought eloquent documentation,
though to no avail. He was met with reflexive blocks. These were passive and aggressive, apparently out of fear of the birth
process and a belief that ultrasound would provide assurance.

Realizing that people require authoritative statements, Jim searched for a simple statement of empirical evidence that could
not be denied.

After several months of intensive research within the Western scientific realm, he, like others, realized there was little
definitive evidence that would satisfy the strict industrial requirements, that is, there were few human studies of any kind.

Human studies had been deemed by authorities to be essential for confirmation of hazards. He was aware of the hundreds
of animal and cell studies, but they were known to be ill-designed and inconclusive. Excellent critical studies were
contradicted by competing studies that declared ultrasound safe. Jim did find a few very strong animal studies that had not
been contradicted, but they were ignored or rejected by mere authoritative assertion.

Electrophoresis:

As a working research theory, Jim hypothesized that the ideal modern ultrasound study would utilize a very sensitive type of
chromatography, called electrophoresis, to detect cell damage caused by ultrasound exposure. Electrophoresis is a simple
technology, the moving of electric current through a sample of biological matter in order to draw its various components
through a gel-covered plate.

The various components separate out through the gel, creating visual patterns for analysis. Electrophoresis is used to
analyze biological complexes such as nucleic acid (DNA or RNA). It is employed, for example, in DNA fingerprinting, to
identify people, their DNA, to detect their prior presence at a location, by examining samples of blood, hair, or tissue and
matching those analytical results with suspects who had been similarly analyzed.
Jims focus on electrophoresis lead to a Chinese electrophoresis study of ultrasound causation for DNA fragmentation in
abortive matter. The study is published in pristine scientific format and published in English. The studys references lead to
an expanding tree of studies located in Chinese online databases such as CNKI. Though these studies are primarily in
Chinese language, many contained an Abstract, translated into English manually or by machine software.

Many studies were reviewed by professor Ruo Feng, of the Acoustic Institute at Nanjing University. He determined
guidelines from the studies, stipulating that routine ultrasound be avoided. Only if there were exceptional medical indications
should ultrasound be allowed, and at minimum intensity. Sessions should be very brief, no more than 3 minutes, 5 minutes
at most. Multiple sessions should be avoided because hazards are cumulative. Sensitive organs were found damaged at 1
minute exposure.

The Chinese studies echo and confirm the earlier, ignored and rejected, 1984 Consensus Statement, written and published
by the National Institute of Health and signed by the preeminent American scientists of that era. (See: NIH, Diagnostic
Ultrasound Imaging in Pregnancy: NIH Consensus Development Conference Statement (February 6, 1984))

Currently, the medical industry loudly claims that ultrasound is harmless while it advocates routine ultrasound for pregnant
women and even prepubescent girls. It is not uncommon for ultrasound sessions to use intensities and durations far above
those used in the Chinese studies.

Jim has done the math and graphically illustrates the evidence, for example, this comparison of Western critical studies and
Chinese studies in terms of durations to damage, when subjected to the average device intensity for a common diagnostic
ultrasound session in B-mode. These durations are approximated extrapolations.

Jims ultrasound causation model is fully compatible with the vaccine model, because it includes the concept of toxic
synergy, and ultrasound is an effective synergist. Ultrasound is theoretically capable of initiating fetal vulnerabilities to
subsequent toxic exposure.

Thus the risk of subsequent exposure to vaccines, birth drugs, antibiotics and other environmental stressors would
be raised by prenatal ultrasound, not in addition, but as a multiplier.

[]

To read the entire press release about the book, go here: http://harvoa.org/chs/pr
Chemotherapy Backfires - Causes Healthy Cells To Feed Growth Of Cancer Tumours
June 17 2015 | From: NaturalNews / Various

Ever since chemotherapy was introduced into the practice of western medicine, doctors and
oncologists have been trying to answer this nagging question:

"Why does chemotherapy seem to work at first, but then cancer tumors cells grow back even more aggressively
while the body becomes resistant to chemotherapy? "

It turns out that chemotherapy damages healthy cells, causing them to secrete a protein that accelerates the growth of
cancer tumors.

Related: Dr Exposes The 97% Failure Rate Of Chemo Along With Big Pharma Kickbacks To Drs - It's All About The Money

Related: Chemotherapy Myth Shattered: Toxic Drugs Cause More Cancer Than They Prevent

This protein, dubbed "WNT16B," is taken up by nearby cancer cells, causing them to "grow, invade, and importantly, resist
subsequent therapy," said Peter Nelson of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. He's the co-author of
the study that documented this phenomenon, published in Nature Medicine.

This protein, it turns out, explains why cancer tumors grow more aggressively following chemotherapy treatments. In
essence, chemotherapy turns healthy cells into WNT16B factories which churn out this "activator" chemical that
accelerates cancer tumor growth.

The findings of the study were confirmed with prostate cancer, breast cancer and ovarian cancer tumors. This discovery that
chemotherapy backfires by accelerating cancer tumor growth is being characterized as "completely unexpected" by
scientists.

The chemotherapy fraud exposed

As NaturalNews has explained over the last decade, chemotherapy is medical fraud. Rather than boosting the immune
response of patients, it harms the immune system, causing tumors to grow back.

This latest researching further confirms what we've known for years in the holistic health community: That chemotherapy is,
flatly stated, poison. It's not "treatment," it's not medicine, and it's not prevention or a cure. It's poison with virtually no
medicinal value except in perhaps one to two percent of cancer cases.

The No. 1 side effect of chemotherapy is, by the way, cancer. Cancer centers should technically be renamed "poison
centers" because they are in the business of poisoning patients with a toxic cocktail of chemicals that modern science
reveals to be a cancer tumor growth accelerant!

Related: Lemon And Baking Soda: A Miraculous Combination That Is 10,000 Times Stronger Than Chemotherapy

Related: Cancer Treatment Alternatives To Radiation And Chemotherapy

Related: Chemotherapy Ineffective 97% Of The Time

British Media Acknowledges Toxic Impacts Of Vaccines - MSM Censorship On Behalf

Of Big Pharma Is Crumbling?
+ The Vaccine Racket: Amazing Infographic Reveals Financial Connections Behind
Criminally-Run Vaccine Industry
June 11 2015 | From: Global Research / NaturalNews / iHealthTube

The censorship Berlin Wall on vaccine injuries is starting to crumble in the UK, at least, where
mainstream media outlets there are suddenly covering the thousands of young girls and boys who
are routinely damaged by toxic vaccines.

The pharma-controlled, vaccine-worshipping U.S. mainstream media, of course, hilariously pretends vaccines
cause no damage to anyone. Thats part of the reason why no one believes the mainstream media anymore, which
explains why mainstream media readership is plummeting while New Media readership is exploding.

Junk science media outlets like the Washington Post - now entirely controlled by Monsanto - attack vaccine skeptics as anti-
science people for pointing out that children are being maimed and sometimes killed by vaccines.

See Hundreds of children brain damaged by the swine flu vaccine to receive $90 million in financial compensation from UK
government.
It makes me wonder: Will the junk science mainstream media in the United States now ridiculously condemn the UK
mainstream media as anti-science for reporting on the thousands of children being neurologically damaged by vaccines?
Does the lamestream media in the USA even remember what journalism is in the first place?

Major media outlets across the UK now practicing actual journalism on the vaccine issue

Check out whats happening in the UK press now all of a sudden. No doubt the vaccine industry is pushing hard to censor all
these stories, so you might want to check them quickly while they still exist online: (h/t to Health Impact News for pointing
these out)

EXPRESS.CO.UK: Tens of thousands of teen girls suffer serious illnesses after HPV cervical
cancer jab
 TENS of thousands of teenage girls have fallen seriously ill and even been left wheelchair-bound after taking the routine
cervical cancer vaccination.

the number is estimated to be only ten per cent of the true number of teens struck down with severe side effects after
taking the vaccine.
 In more than a quarter of the cases, the effects have apparently been so severe that they were considered life-
threatening and required immediate medical treatment.

The Independent: Thousands of teenage girls enduring debilitating illnesses after routine school
cancer vaccination
 Emily is one of the thousands of teenage girls who have endured debilitating illnesses following the routine immunisation.
She is yet to recover and has no idea when her health will return to normal.

In the 10 years to April this year the agency received almost 22,000 spontaneous suspected adverse drug reaction
(ADR) reports in 13 routine immunisation categories including flu, MMR, tetanus, diphtheria and polio, according to a
Freedom of Information response released earlier this month.

PoTS and fibromyalgia are among the diseases he believes have developed after HPV vaccination, and that clinicians
should be aware of the possible association between HPV vaccination and the development of these difficult to diagnose
painful syndromes.

The Daily Mail (UK): Tens of thousands of teenage girls believed to have fallen ill with debilitating
illnesses after routine HPV cervical cancer jab
 Side effects including chest and abdominal pains, exhaustion, breathing difficulties, fibromyalgia and postural orthostatic
tachycardia syndrome.

Some have been left wheelchair-bound by apparent effects of vaccine.

 Worried mothers have told how their previously healthy daughters have suffered fits, extreme tiredness and even been
left wheelchair-bound after being vaccinated in their early teens. In some cases, the girls started to feel ill on the day they
were vaccinated. Others became sick several weeks later.

Even France is now covering the vaccine debate with a sense of logic

Check out this story: Mainstream media vigorously debates vaccine safety in France. It explains:

In the US, Canada and the rest of the English-speaking world, questioning vaccine safety is a taboo subject, one the
mainstream press fears to touch, let alone to debate. Not so in France

Should we have doubts about vaccines? asked a popular radio program last month, marking European Immunization
Week. The program, which ran on France Inter, a major public channel that is part of Radio France, introduced the subject
by acknowledging the doubts and concerns about the usefulness of vaccines that have led the French to have less and
less confidence in vaccines. France Inter then held a no-holds-barred debate between a controversial proponent of
increased vaccine use

[Another] example comes from Le Figaro, Frances second largest daily. After the French press last month reported that two
infants died and hundreds had been injured after receiving rotavirus vaccines, Figaro examined the various issues at play,
including conflict of interest government regulators have had pharmaceutical industry ties and the wisdom of having
these vaccines recommended by public health authorities.

Vaccine violence against children totally ignored by the pharma-controlled U.S. media

All this vaccine violence being committed against children worldwide is purely imaginary, according to the U.S. mainstream
media.

Anyone even citing such statistics is automatically labeled anti-science by pathetic vaccine pushers who profit from the
continued medical mutilation of innocent children.

Ive even heard the idea of vaccine damage being labeled a conspiracy theory by the pro-pharma media the same
media that conducted a total nationwide news blackout on the public admission of a CDC whistleblower scientist who
admitted that he took part in a CDC cover-up to hide links between vaccines and autism.

Thats how loony the corporate-controlled media has become: They label you a conspiracy theorist if you practice good
science and good medicine by observing biological reactions to a routine medical intervention. Meanwhile, what they report
as facts are actually fairytale delusions such as the idea that vaccines harm no one and can be safely given to children in
essentially unlimited quantities.

The real anti-science kooks, it turns out, are the blindly obedient vaccine pushers! (They also happen to be extremely
angry egomaniacs who reek of vile hatred for humanity and of children specifically.)

UK media has realized journalistic integrity requires the practicing of actual journalism

While tens of thousands of injured young children is no laughing matter, it is rather hilarious that the U.S. mainstream
medias obedience to the total quackery of vaccine safety is causing its own rapid loss of credibility, readership and
revenues. Thats why the value of old media publishers is rapidly collapsing while, at the same time, alternative media
websites are exploding in popularity.

THANK YOU, lamestream media, for creating the journalism vacuum now being filled by independent media outlets like
Natural News websites that never would have grown at all if the media had been doing its job in the first place.

And what do we want to see with vaccines here in the New Media? Were not opposed to the theory of immunization, and we
most certainly arent opposed to good science (Im the science lab director of the Natural News Forensic Food Lab,
conducting PhD-level atomic spectrometry analysis and original research on heavy metals in foods).

We merely want to see all toxic chemicals and heavy metals removed from vaccines and for government to
respect parents rights in deciding what medical interventions are best for their own children. It doesnt sound like much of a
demand, really. Its just a demand for protecting children and respecting fundamental civil rights.
I never thought Id see the day that demanding we stop poisoning children with mercury in flu shots is called anti-science.
But here we are, and that just tells you how insane the monopoly-run, criminal-minded vaccine industry has become these
days. No wonder the public craves truthful reporting on this subject!

BOTTOM LINE: Any media outlet that tells you vaccines are safe is knowingly committing journalistic
malpractice and lying to your face. They are paid by Big Pharma to tell such lies, and they knowingly put children in
harms way for their own selfish profits.

Even the ethically challenged vaccine pushers they roll out to push vaccines - people like Paul Offit - totally abandon ethics
by failing to disclose their own financial ties to the vaccine industry when theyre interviewed on TV.

Dont get your news on the USA from mainstream media within the USA

Heres an important takeaway point on all this: Never read the U.S. mainstream media for any purpose other than tabloid
entertainment. Most mainstream outlets are totally clueless, compromised and corrupted.

Although there are intelligent reporters who work inside the U.S. media, they are handcuffed by censorship and editorial
directives that prevent them from reporting the truth on GMOs, vaccines and other important topics.

(I know this because many of them have come to me asking for work and explaining the kind of Orwellian censorship under
which they operate. You would not believe the number of formerly mainstream media reporters who now work for Natural
News and the number is growing by the week right now as we keep expanding)

If you want news about the USA from a mainstream source, start reading the Daily Mail (UK). Or check out Der Spiegel, Al
Jazeera, RT, Sputnik News or The Intercept. Youll never get accurate news about the U.S. vaccine industry from the U.S.
sellout media.

They are just propaganda tools of the drug makers, and theyre more than willing to see children harmed and even
killed as long as they get their precious ad revenue from Big Pharma.

The Vaccine Racket: Amazing Infographic Reveals Financial Connections Behind

Criminally-Run Vaccine Industry
This Vaccine Racket Infographic details the financial connections behind the criminally-run vaccine industry.

The infographic documents the nefarious players of the vaccine industry: the mainstream media, the CDC, deceitful vaccine
propagandists like Paul Offit, the secretive vaccine court, the cover-up of vaccine-injured children, mainstream media
propaganda that programs the public to worship vaccines, and much more.

I first sketched out this Vaccine Racket Infographic after observing the behavior of all the key players in the contrived
Disneyland measles outbreak, which was used as a public panic springboard to launch a series of government-enforced
vaccine mandate legislation efforts across the country.

Every player in the vaccine racket played its role in that "medical theater" episode, displaying uncanny coordination and a
well-funded ability to gin up the kind of fear mongering that's only pursued when corporate profits are at stake.

Here's a scaled-down edition of the infographic. Click it to view a larger image:

Another CDC-linked fugitive from justice, Poul Thorsen

While you're examining the runaway criminality of the vaccine racket, don't forget the CDC-linked fugitive from justice known
as Poul Thorsen, who absconded with millions of dollars in federal vaccine research funds (after faking vaccine research for
the CDC to downplay the links between vaccines and autism).

Click here for the PDF infographic detailing Thorsen's web of fraud. See thumbnail here:

Also see these related articles:

Key CDC scientist who downplayed vaccine-autism connection is now fleeing from justice

CDC scientific fraud: an update on Dr. Poul Thorsen who authored fraudulent study 'disproving' vaccine-autism connection
and stole millions of dollars

Central Figure in CDC Vaccine Safety Studies Investigated for Fraud

CDC vaccine scientist who downplayed links to autism indicted by DOJ in alleged fraud scheme

She Did the Vaccine Research-You Won't Believe What She Found!

Dr. Sherry Tenpenny has spent many hours studying the effects of vaccines. The list of side effects is long, and that's just for
one vaccine she mentions here! Find out what she found and what potential dangers might be!
Australian Researcher: Phone Radiation Is A Hotline To Brain Cancer +
Is Wi-Fi Making Your Child Ill?
June 9 2015 | From: TheTelegraph / Sputnik / WiFiInSchoolsAustralia

A highly respected Australian doctor, currently in remission from brain cancer, is speaking out on
his belief that radiation from wifi, cell phones and their towers is a major factor in increasing brain
cancer rates.

Dr. John Tickell is attempting to raise awareness and is calling for more funding for brain cancer research, as it has
become the number one most deadly cancer for young people in Australia. According to the Australian
government, there are 35 new cases of the cancer discovered each week with four out of five cases being fatal
in the first five years.

"Leukaemia was once the leading causes of cancer deaths in Australia for under 40s but it now has a five-year
survival rate of over 80 per cent. Breast cancer is around 90 cent compared to brain cancer which is around 20 per
cent," Tickell told the Herald Sun.

The Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association is denying any detrimental health effects from their radiation, but the
World Health Organization has recently upgraded the radiation threat to category B2, meaning "possibly carcinogenic."

"You can say you can't prove it in my mind it is proven looking at the studies that are unfunded by industry," he
said.
The largest study to take place so far was conducted among 5000 cancer patients. The study found that there was no
increased risk of overall cancer, but cellphone use was linked to patients having a 40% increased likeliness of developing
Glioma, a common type of brain cancer.

Tickell also blasted the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and the fact that they have seemingly
left all investigation to the telecommunications companies themselves.

"The telco-funded studies say theyre safe but the FCC has not done any tests on radiation from phones in 20
years," Tickell lamented.

"There's a million more times radiation in the air today than there was fifty years ago that is frightening," he said.

This Video Follows the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency's advice
(ARPANSA Factsheet 14 - updated June 2013) on reducing wireless radiation - and explores the
implications of children using wireless devices such as iPads, at home and at school.

The video includes an explanation of SAR values, a real life test of iPads vs iPhones and ARPANSA's practical advice on
how to reduce exposure from mobile and other wireless devices.

Let's educate children on how to use wireless technologies safely.

Protect children from (RF EME) wireless radio frequency microwave electro magnetic radiation (EMR) until long-term
exposure is proven harmless.

Safe use of technology Your guide by WiFi in Schools Australia raises awareness on the new recommendations from the
Queensland Department of Education, Training and Employment (DETE) for the safe use of wireless radiation emitting
technologies.

As of 12 December 2014 DETEs Safe use of technology documents have still not been posted on their website and made
publicly available.

Therefore, WiFi in Schools Australia have produced this video with links below to DETEs documents. The World Health
Organisations (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) have classified all radiofrequency
electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans - wireless technologies are now considered as a possible cancer
causing agent.

In the absence of conclusive scientific evidence or safety standards that take into account biological effects from prolonged
exposure, we need to use wireless technology consciously. Educate children on the safe use of technology and reduce
wireless radiation exposure.

WiFiInSchoolsAustralia Posted by Blushield Global on Oct 9, 2014 This is the URL to the wi-fi in schools Australia website. It
is fantastic, you must have a look at it.

Is Wi-Fi Making Your Child Ill?

As France bans Wi-Fi in nursery and primary schools, a British expert who has given up using
wireless gadgets says we should do the same.
Six years ago, Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe moved to the country, stopped carrying a mobile phone and sacrificed a
successful career in emergency medicine to focus on a new medical interest radiation emitted by Wi-Fi, mobiles
and other wireless devices.

She is now one of the countrys few professional advisers on medical conditions related to radiofrequency (RF) radiation and
other electromagnetic fields (EMFs).

"I was using wireless devices before most people I knew I loved it, says Mallery-Blythe, who was ahead of the
tech trend even in 1985 when she was handed her first mobile phone, aged 10.

But as soon as I started digesting the literature on EMFs it was a no-brainer, she says of her decision to relinquish
wireless gadgets.

I wasnt willing to take that kind of risk for something that was purely convenient.

WiFi is not harming our children: here's the evidence

Wi-Fi fears: three-year study into health risks of mobiles to children's brains

Her interest in EMFs started in 2009 after she began noticing increasing trends in certain symptoms headaches, insomnia,
fatigue and palpitations, but also more serious conditions including brain tumours in young people, fertility problems and
accelerating neurological diseases such as early onset Alzheimers and autism.

As yet there is still no scientific proof that relates these diseases to radiation, but Mallery-Blythe is among a not insignificant
number of scientists and practitioners concerned by those studies that do highlight cause for more precaution.
Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe discusses the effects of Wi-Fi radiation with a class of schoolchildren

Over the past few years, as Wi-Fi, laptops and iPads have become increasingly prevalent in classrooms, Mallery-Blythe says
hundreds of families have sought her help with what they believe to be EMF-related diseases and health issues.

One such case is that of nine-year-old Jessica Lewiss family. In the autumn term of 2011, Jessica started to complain that
she was getting bad headaches at school.

She was also feeling overly tired, developed rashes on her legs and her parents said she looked completely washed out
after school, particularly on Mondays. A quick internet search threw up a forum where parents had written that their children
complained of similar symptoms after installing Wi-Fi.

Introducing the pepper grinder that will switch off your kids' phones

"I ignored it. We didnt know anything about Wi-Fi then, says Jessicas father, Paul Lewis.

We didnt think her school had it.

Later that term, at a parents evening, he noticed a Wi-Fi router near Jessicas desk in her new form classroom. As it turned
out, Monday was the day of the week the whole class worked on laptops.

When a local GP backed up Lewiss suspicions about Wi-Fi being the probable cause of Jessicas headaches, he went to
some lengths to try to convince Spotbrough Copley Junior School in Doncaster to use wires instead of Wi-Fi, even offering to
pay for the school building to be wired with cables.

Mobile phones unlikely to harm human health, scientists find

The school pointed out that a government report advised that Wi-Fi exposures were well within internationally accepted
standards. Guidelines were reviewed in 2011 and still stand today.
 "We do not think the balance of available scientific evidence on radiofrequency has shifted and, as such, our
position remains that PHE [Public Health England] sees no reason why Wi-Fi should not continue to be used in
schools and in other places

- Dr Simon Mann at PHE, the [UK] Department of Healths agency in charge of health protection.

Dr Mallery-Blythe tests radiation levels at a school internet router

That just didnt add up, says Lewis.

Now Jessica is home-schooled, much to her frustration, because symptoms resurface when shes exposed to Wi-Fi.

In February, insurance market Lloyds of London syndicate CFC Underwriting Ltd informed schools that it was excluding
liability coverage for injuries resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation,
electromagnetism, radio waves or noise, which means that school officials could be personally liable for exposing children
and staff to microwave radiation.

"The Government is expecting head teachers to decide whether risk versus benefit is worthwhile. This seems unfair
to me, says Mallery-Blythe.

Most teachers dont even know that RF is currently classified by the International Agency for Research on
Cancer (IARC) as a Group 2B carcinogen, which means it is a possible cause of cancer in humans.

There is a vast amount of published literature documenting the harmful effects on every biological system.

Most people understandably dont have time to read and digest it all.
 Ban mobile phones and wireless networks in schools, say European leaders

As well as founding the Physicians Health Initiative for Radiation and Environment (PHIRE) to inform doctors of the issues
and advise on best health practice, Mallery-Blythe gives talks to teachers around the country, in which she presents scientific
studies that reveal both short and long-term effects of EMF exposure.

One of the talks (below) has had more than 15,000 views on YouTube since last November. Its an engaging summary of the
issues that concerned scientists are discussing.

I try to present the facts the authorities arent highlighting, says Mallery-Blythe.

I was surprised to find myself glued to it. Particularly eye-opening are the number of widely held misconceptions about
radiation safety that Mallery-Blythe sets about busting. Standing a good distance away from a Wi-Fi router may reduce
radiation intensity, for example, but low-intensity windows of radiation have been shown to be more harmful in some studies
than higher-intensity exposures.

"At the moment people think their children are safe because the router is far away or we dont have to worry about
the phone because its not near the brain. Thats common sense but unfortunately we now know its not quite true,
she says, pointing out that the brain is better protected than some more vulnerable parts of the body.

Are the Department of Health and PHE doing too little? My main issue with the PHEs stance is that its
contradictory, says Mallery-Blythe.

Theyve issued a caution saying children under 16 shouldnt be using mobile phones except for essential calls, but
theyve been quite happy to support the one-to-one iPad scheme, though an iPad can have an equivalent or higher
SAR (the rate at which energy is absorbed by the human body when exposed to a radio frequency) than a phone.
Switch your phone to flight mode or turn it off as often as you can, advises Dr Mallery-Blythe

Associate Professor Olle Johansson, a neuroscientist at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, compares putting an iPhone
near a babys head to putting it next to several electric train engines, pointing out that working with train engines is
Swedens highest occupational exposure allowance.

Johansson has been researching the biological effects of radiofrequency (RF) wireless radiation for more than 30 years, but
says it has become extremely hard to get funding in this area. Given the importance of the subject Id say thats more than
enigmatic.

He predicts a paradigm shift in attitudes towards EMF. We are currently living in an environment estimated to contain more
than 10billion times more RF radiation than it did in the Sixties.

If this environment is safe were talking about in the order of 15,000 to 25,000 papers in peer-reviewed scientific
journals all being wrong. That has never happened before.

We just want to see some precautionary action put in place, and were not seeing it" .

Wi-Fi at home: Dr Erica Mallery-Blythes advice

Try to keep your mobile switched off and dont use it unless you need to. Keep it in flight mode when it is on and never
carry your mobile close to your body, even on standby.

Dont use Wi-Fi for internet. Instead use an Ethernet cable and buy a router with no wireless capacity or disable it. Disable
Wi-Fi on your computer or tablet by disabling the wireless card via the control panel or putting it into flight mode.
 Replace cordless landlines with corded ones. Most cordless telephones give off radiation whether theyre in use or not .

Background

In February the French government banned Wi-Fi in nursery schools and restricted use in primary schools. The German
government has recommended that the use of Wi-Fi in the workplace or home should be avoided where possible. LA has
reduced student exposure to Wi-Fi radiation to 10,000 times below US government standard.

In 2000, a report commissioned by the Government concluded that no school should fall within 100 metres of a mobile
phone mast; in 2007 a BBC Panorama programme found that the readings next to a classroom laptop showed radiation at
double the level only 100 metres from a mobile phone mast.

A five-year-old absorbs up to 60 per cent more radiation than an adult due largely to their thinner skulls and the
high water content of a young body. In Western countries brain tumours have overtaken leukaemia as the most
common cause of cancer in children.

A 2008 study found a fivefold increase in the risk of glioma (a form of brain cancer now recognised by the World Health
Organisation as being linked to mobile phone usage) for those starting mobile phone use under 20 years of age,
indicating that the age group at first use is highly significant.

Schools and parents can find out more through ssita.org.uk

How To Privatise The Most Vulnerable

June 8 2015 | From: NewstalkZB / ActionStation

Within a fortnight, the government closed the heavy doors of Relationships Aotearoa and opened
up a new floodgate for private investment into mental health [This is incrementalism in action -
and most of the 'Sheeple' are too stupid to notice]

Health Minister Jonathan Coleman and Prime Sinister John Key

This is the culmination of five long years of deep funding cuts to various agencies and NGOs tasked with helping
the most vulnerable: Relationships Aotearoa, which had 60,000 clients nationally and treated 30,000 Cantabrians for
post-earthquake trauma, shut. Access to WINZ disability benefits has been narrowing for years. Womens Refuge
safehouses have been crowdfunding their operating hours. Rape Crisis centres close, as do local community NGOs
such as New Plymouths Like Minds which shuttered last week.

To counteract these cuts and still retain a look of sincerity in the face of genuine pain, the government revealed its plan to
privatise and commoditise mental health.

Social bonds, although cluttered with wretched biz-speak, are fairly simple to understand: An NGO partners with investors
(banks, philanthropists) and signs a contract to deliver a particular service. If the outcome is favourable, the investor gets
their money back. If not, the investors lose out.

Such an apparently radical scheme looks like a win-win-win for all involved. However, the first of four social bonds
announced will encourage mental health patients into work not treatment.

Some very pressing questions arise from the idea: Has it been tested before? Will investors have sway over how people are
treated? Isnt this just selling out the most vulnerable?

Under Health Minister Jonathan Coleman, social bonds have come to fruition. Publicly, he has justified them by citing a tiny
test case about which nothing has been revealed. No figures, no data, no outcomes.

In a statement last weekend, Coleman referred to a;

small and successful pilot delivering employment services to people with mental health conditions.

This is the same pilot he again referred to on Morning Report, claiming it was Very successful [in getting] people
with mental health issues into work. Its working.

When asked about this pilot Colemans office refused to give details, insisting only that it was run from a single GP
practice.

They would not say where in the country it was, nor how many patients it worked with. They claimed confidentiality when
declining to reveal what type of employment the patients were encouraged to perform.

The obvious question should be asked: if the Minister wants to sing the praises of the very idea from which the wider social
bonds plan takes its inspiration, why not reveal just how successful it is?

Of course, there is no reason at all why social bonds must be tested on mental health guinea pigs (as Annette King
put it).

The cabinet paper which approved social bonds in 2013 does not mention mental health. Nor does the right-wing
thinktank the New Zealand Initiative, which produced a report praising social bonds, and praised the government in
turn.

Instead, both the cabinet paper and the NZI report notes the trialling of social bonds in other countries to stop criminals
reoffending. Recidivism has been the focus in the UK, three states in the US, and Canada. Mental health is not mentioned at
all.

Inevitably, the focus on outcomes and targets for mentally unwell citizens casts aside any consideration of treating them
in the long term. It is about employment, not treatment. Work, not genuine improvements in their lives. Paying tax, not
ensuring they remain functioning members of society.

There is a clue to this mindset in the 2013 cabinet paper mentioned above. It says government agencies are now focusing
on what is being achieved, not how services are delivered. [their italics]
Such abrasive commoditisation produces only one thing: human beings with very real and genuine sensations become
statistics. Their reality is ignored in favour of slotting them into a spreadsheet which might earn an investor a nice five
percent return on their cash.

In the UK, this monetised and numericised kind of existence has led to some very real humiliation. When the British
government outsourced a scheme to get people with disabilities into work, some very troubling things happened:

A Falklands veteran with one leg and terminal cancer was deemed fit for work.

Absurdly, a woman in a coma was told she was suitable for intensive job-focused activity.

Doctors were told to keep quiet about work assessments while whistleblowers called attention to strict interpretations of what
it meant to be able to perform work.

When investors are given sway over how services are delivered, this exploitation is likely. To his credit, Coleman has stated
in parliament that mental health patients will not be abused, and investors will not be allowed to fudge results, but this is
very faint assurance indeed.

There is also a larger point to be made here about language: the words and terminology that agencies, businesses, and
ministries use to discuss complex problems, the weight of which cannot be understated.

Just like job cuts are referred to as restructuring and disestablishment, the lives of people living with disabilities are
reduced to throwaway obfuscations like social outcomes and performance targets. The KPI-sation of societys most
pressing concerns should be very troubling for anyone who wants to treat real people as exactly that: real people.

The latest double-hand of funding cuts and privatisations are yet more evidence that this government has no intention of
either treating mental illnesses with genuine compassion or sincerity.

The end goal, according to Jonathan Coleman, is to help them get back into work, and nothing more. Compassionate
conservatism indeed.

The Government is set to give private investors the opportunity to invest in and make
money from social services, beginning with our mental health sector.

These so called social impact bonds', which the Government are using to privatise the mental health sector, have
failed around the world. Kyle MacDonald, an expert from the New Zealand Association of Psychotherapists,
explains: our concern is that as we have seen in other areas profit becomes the primary motivation of funders, not
optimal care.

The mental health sector doesnt need experiments - it needs more direct funding from the Government.

We cant let our most vulnerable citizens be the subjects of this unproven experiment.

Sign and share to tell the Minister of Health Jonathan Coleman to stop the privatisation of our mental health
sector:

Social Bonds allow for private investors to invest in Government services - in this case contracts that involve getting
people with mental health problems back to work. While this may sound like a good objective, experience
overseas has shown that it carries risks such as people being pushed into work prematurely, and regardless of
whether it suits their individual needs.
 There is no evidence that this approach works, and in fact it has been shown to cause services to focus on
profit not better outcomes for consumers.

We need to send a strong message to the Health Minister Jonathan Coleman that we do not want this funding
experiment to put the wellbeing of Mental Health consumers at risk and that any spending on Mental Health needs
to address the underfunding of core Mental Health services.

Click here to tell the Minister to stop the privatisation of the mental health sector.

So what exactly is proposed? Social service providers and NGOs will be asked to team up with private
investors to carry out their work. Later, that money is reimbursed to the investor by the Government, with
interest, if the organisation meets specified performance targets.

This can lead to perverse incentives, where for example only easy clients are taken on, or organisations
game the system. In New Zealand, we have already seen examples of this. To achieve elective surgery targets,
District Health Boards removed people from waiting lists, creating a situation where individual health outcomes
were made worse, but the target was achieved.

Experts, allies and advocates throughout New Zealand are speaking up to say issuing social bonds for mental
health services risks being an unfortunate experiment undertaken with society's most vulnerable.

Sign the petition to tell the Minister of Health that we dont want our mental health sector privatised with this
risky experiment.

This Is What The Medical Profession Hopes You Never Find Out - Dr. Edward Group
June 7 2015 | From: iHealthTube

Dr. Group discusses the brainwashing that goes on in University Medical Schools - and how Med
Students are not taught how to analyse and break down pharmaceutical medications and analyse
them; just how to prescribe them.
Dr. Group recounts his awakening whereby he realised that everything he was going to be taught was wrong - that
all of the pharmaceutical medications were causing more and more problems in the human body; hence requiring
more pharamaceutical medications - meaning phenomenal profits for the drug companies, from a perpetually
sickened population.

Related: Clive de Carle: How You Can Restore Your Health And Enable Your Body To Self-Repair From Virtually Any
Disease Or Affliction

He then goes on to talk about how he came to understand what causes disease and as a result, the very successful holistic
approach that he uses to this day that prevents and eliminates all degenerative diseases, including cancer.

UKs Independent Newspaper Blows The Lid Off Vaccine Damages

June 4 2015 | From: ActivistPost

Finally its happened! A member of the mainstream press has the intestinal fortitude to publish the
carefully kept secret, secret about vaccines and vaccinations: They cause dramatic life-altering
damage and more frequently than evidence-based medicine or consensus science owns up
to or MDs, the medical profession, public health agencies and pro-vaccine acolytes acknowledge.
The UKs Independent Newspaper published some extremely damning vaccine adverse drug reaction (ADR)
information on May 31, 2015 that said:

In the 10 years to April this year the agency received almost 22,000 spontaneous suspected adverse drug
reaction (ADR) reports in 13 routine immunisation categories including flu, MMR, tetanus, diphtheria and polio,
according to a Freedom of Information response released earlier this month."

However, the vaccine ante has just been upped on vaccines adverse events/damages according to the Freedom of
Information (FOI) documentation dated May 14, 2015, according to the chart below.

Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency FOI Response

14 May 2015 The vaccine with the most ADR reports was
the Human papillomarivus (HPV) for which
there are three vaccines:

Gardasil, Cervarix, and recently licensed

Gardasil 9 with 8,228 ADRs.

Next in line is the annual Influenza virus

vaccine with 2,994 ADRs.

The MMR (Measles, mumps and rubella)

with 1,594 ADRs is third highest.

Fourth highest ADR reporting count is

Pneumococcal disease (PCV) with 1,560
ADRs.

Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and

haemophilus influenza type B with 1,309
ADRs is fifth.
 Sixth highest ADR is for Diphtheria, tetanus,
pertussis and polio with 1,190.

Seventh is Tetanus, diphtheria and polio with

1,076 ADRs.

Those ADRs represent health damage from

whats called multi-valent vaccines,
meaning more than one disease active is
contained in a vaccination or jab, as its
called in the UK. Six other vaccines had
ADRs reporting fewer than one thousand,
which should not be regarded as
insignificant.

The above information demonstrably demonstrates and validates what vaccine-safety-advocates (often referred to as
anti-vaxxers) have been beating the drums about:

Vaccines cause irreversible damage and, as the U.S. VAERS reporting system - similar to the UKs ADR reporting
system - even deaths and for which the U.S. Vaccine Court has settled claims.

So, its indisputable that vaccines cause adverse health problems, which undeniably increase healthcare costs for everyone
involved, plus promote more Big Pharma patented products to deal with those ADRs. Can that be one of the hidden
aspects for promoting vaccines as assiduously as government health agencies do?

The UK is not unique in ADRs from vaccines.

Every country in the world that has any vaccine program reports serious ADRs.

However, what is unique is that in the USA those ADRs are not permitted to be discussed in the mainstream press
and media.

The Independents report truly is refreshing insofar as the cat is out of the bag definitely, and lets make certain it stays out;
that journalists globally report vaccine damage, and especially in the supposed free press of the United States of America.

Back in May of 2013, the U.K. revealed via FOI documents that there were 30 years of secret official documents
showing that U.K. government vaccine/medical experts have:

1) known the vaccines dont work;

2) known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent;

3) known they are a hazard to children;

4) colluded to lie to the public; and

 5) worked to prevent safety studies!

Can you imagine how many children worldwide would have been saved from lifelong health problems - or even premature
deaths - caused by vaccines IF any one of the governments colluding on the above vaccine skullduggery would have had the
integrity to tell the world the scientific facts about vaccines:

That Big Pharmas vaccines actually cause harm; do not prevent disease but cause the very diseases in vaccines?
Vaccines preventing diseases probably is the BIGGEST lie ever told! Why?

Because its been perpetuated for so long, that most gullible people believe it.

Please check out the Resources section below for additional information, which is only a fraction of whats going on about
vaccines that readers may not know about due to the controlled free press in the USA.

The press and media are beholden to Big Pharma, probably because of all the advertising dollars Pharma spends in their
daily newspapers and especially on TV. All those erectile dysfunction ads add up to advertising profits! The U.S. FDA also is
beholden to Big Pharma for all the funding and consensus science it gets from them.

One last word about vaccines: They are not safe; never have been tested for the ability to cause cancer, interfere
with reproduction or fertility, or their ability to cause birth defects (teratogenic). It states that right there on every
vaccine package insert.

Next time your MD, employer or school wants to vaccinate you or your child, ask to see the vaccine package insert
section that documents in print that the vaccine has never been tested for what was just discussed in the above
paragraph.

Ask him/her if he/she knew that, plus why would he/she want to inject you with toxins that can harm, as it explicitly
states in the rest of the vaccine package insert, especially when every MD is sworn to do no harm.

Introducing Social Bonds Or How National Is Privatising Health Care

June 3 2015 | From: AotearoaAWiderPerspective

This week, only a week after they closed relationship Aotearoa, the government announced that
they were introducing social bonds to private investors. They are doing so to allow private
investors the chance to invest in mental healthcare.
The idea is that people invest in these bonds and only if the results are measurably positive will the investors get
their money back!

Mental healthcare patients are among the most vulnerable of patients and here in man up New Zealand are also the ones
most likely to avoid seeking treatment and if they do often end up between wall and ship because it is so hard to diagnose
and treat. It is not for nothing this sector was chosen as the pilot for this new government initiative. Nobody likes a whinger
and nobody ever expects to end up needing help for psychological problems.

Make no mistake however. This is a pilot. What that means is, they are testing the water. Expect bonds to be issued for other
healthcare products. And if you borrow you have to pay it back. The argument that we only have to pay it back if the results
are positive is a misleading one because no investor is going to invest in bonds unless there result is a return.

One of the ways in which the private organisations have to prove themselves is by earning money. The only way to earn
money is by declaring people fit for work or no longer needing assistance. Independent but equally privately owned
Assessment organisations do the assessment of people receiving treatment or funding for treatment.

These organisations depend on for their work on the results they deliver too. What that means for sick people is that not their
health but their ability to go back to work at the most early convenience judged by privately owned company who wants to
make money is the most important decision factor.

In England one such private assessors is Atos. Atos has been known to judge people lying on their deathbeds fit for work
and cutting them off from much needed disability income. Atos forces people undergoing Cancer treatment to go back to
work. They have also been known to cut off people with disabilities such as paralysed legs because they were able to push
their wheel chairs with their hands.

As someone watching my husband, who had to go back to work way to soon after a serious operation because we didnt
have the funds for him to recover properly, suffer and who is now on ACC (He is one of the lucky ones) because he hit a
psychological wall as well as having to deal with the physical consequences of what happened to him, I can assure you that
this is not option for long term solutions in healthcare.

It will not help people get back to a normal healthy life. It will only make more and more damaged people trying to get on and
deteriorating to a point were there are no solutions left. Expect higher rates of suicide, domestic violence, violent deaths and
less social cohesion and community.

According to the Ministry of health web page these bonds are currently used or starting to be used in: The United Kingdom,
United States, South America, Holland, South Africa, Belgium and Australia, and are being actively explored in Canada,
Ireland and Israel.

The purpose for the pilot is:

Test the concept within the New Zealand context to see whether this is an effective and efficient way for government to
reduce social problems

Develop the conditions to use social bonds more widely in the future: including growing the social-investor market and
building capabilities of service providers, government agencies and Intermediaries

Learn lessons that could be applied to other forms of payments-for-results and/or outcomes-based contracting

Enable Government to make more informed decisions on whether to use payments-for-results and outcomes based
contracting more widely.

Kennedy Drops Bombshell: 70% News Ad Revenue From Pharma

June 2 2015 | From: NaturalBlaze

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is at it again. After speaking in Sacramento, California against SB-277,
pummeling the Centers for Disease Control during public testimony in Vermontand appearing on
Bill Mahers HBO show to do the same, he has now broke major news during a recent interview.
Speaking with former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura regarding the vaccine industry and big pharma, Kennedy
confirmed what many have assumed by stating:

I ate breakfast last week with the president of a network news division and he told me that during non-election
years, 70% of the advertising revenues for his news division come from pharmaceutical ads.

And if you go on TV any night and watch the network news, youll see they become just a vehicle for selling
pharmaceuticals. He also told me that he would fire a host who brought onto his station a guest who lost him a
pharmaceutical account.

These powerful admissions by Kennedy are made with the supporting backdrop of five-time Emmy Award winning
investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson recently stated:

If people were simply covering in terms of news value, facts, and fairness wed be giving way more coverage to
vaccine side effects, autism, ADD, and all the immune disorders that have emerged in the past and been made
untouchable by this environment that Ive discussed with you (referring to astroturfing.)"

Indeed it appears that we are seeing a major push by highly unethical, fraudulent pharmaceutical companies attempting to
legally corral the entire American public into unwilling consumers of their vaccine products. This current move has revealed
major conflicts-of-interest among many senators, news organizations and regulatory agencies.

In addition, there appears to be a near mutiny among good senators and congressmen who are rapidly introducing bills to
counter the drug company-sponsored vaccine exemption removal push being witnessed in state houses across the U.S.

Monsanto's Worst Fear May Be Coming True

May 31 2015 | From: IndependentScienceNews

The tide is turning against the globalization of GMO-based agriculture and forced feeding with
consumers leading the charge from the bottom up demanding informed consent (e.g. labeling,
independent science) and organic alternatives.
The decision of the Chipotle restaurant chain to make its product lines GMO-free is not most people's idea of a
world-historic event. Especially since Chipotle, by US standards, is not a huge operation. A clear sign that the move
is significant, however, is that Chipotle's decision was met with a tidal-wave of establishment media abuse.

Chipotle has been called irresponsible, anti-science, irrational, and much more by the Washington Post, Time Magazine,
the Chicago Tribune, the LA Times, and many others. A business deciding to give consumers what they want was surely
never so contentious.

The media lynching of Chipotle has an explanation that is important to the future of GMOs. The cause of it is that there has
long been an incipient crack in the solid public front that the food industry has presented on the GMO issue. The crack
originates from the fact that while agribusiness sees GMOs as central to their business future, the brand-oriented and
customer-sensitive ends of the food supply chain do not.
The brands who sell to the public, such as Nestle, Coca-Cola, Kraft, etc., are therefore much less committed to GMOs. They
have gone along with their use, probably because they wish to maintain good relations with agribusiness, who are their allies
and their suppliers. Possibly also they see a potential for novel products in a GMO future.

However, over the last five years, as the reputation of GMOs has come under increasing pressure in the US, the cost to food
brands of ignoring the growing consumer demand for GMO-free products has increased. They might not say so in public,
but the sellers of top brands have little incentive to take the flack for selling GMOs.

From this perspective, the significance of the Chipotle move becomes clear. If Chipotle can gain market share and prestige,
or charge higher prices, from selling non-GMO products and give (especially young) consumers what they want, it puts
traditional vendors of fast and processed food products in an invidious position.

Kraft and McDonald's, and their traditional rivals can hardly be left on the sidelines selling outmoded products to a shrinking
market. They will not last long.
And this is just one example.

MacDonald's already appears to be in trouble, and it too sees the solution as moving to more up-market and healthier
products. For these much bigger players, a race to match Chipotle and get GMOs out of their product lines, is a strong
possibility. That may not be so easy, in the short term, but for agribusiness titans who have backed GMOs, like Monsanto,
Dupont, Bayer and Syngenta; a race to be GMO-free is the ultimate nightmare scenario.

Until Chipotle's announcement, such considerations were all behind the scenes. But all of a sudden this split has spilled out
into the food media. On May 8th, Hain Celestial told The Food Navigator that:

"We sell organic products...gluten-free products and...natural products. [But] where the big, big demand is, is GMO-free."

According to the article, unlike Heinz, Kraft, and many others, Hain Celestial is actively seeking to meet this demand. Within
the food industry, important decisions, for and against GMOs, are taking place.

Why the pressure to remove GMOs will grow

The other factor in all this turmoil is that the GMO technology wheel has not stopped turning. New GMO products are coming
on stream that will likely make crop biotechnology even less popular than it is now. This will further ramp up the pressure on
brands and stores to go GMO-free. There are several contributory factors.
The first issue follows from the recent US approvals of GMO crops resistant to the herbicides 2,4-D and Dicamba. These
traits are billed as replacements for Roundup-resistant traits whose effectiveness has declined due to the spread of weeds
resistant to Roundup (Glyphosate).

The causes of the problem, however, lie in the technology itself. The introduction of Roundup-resistant traits in corn and
soybeans led to increasing Roundup use by farmers (Benbrook 2012). Increasing Roundup use led to weed resistance,
which led to further Roundup use, as farmers increased applications and dosages. This translated into escalated ecological
damage and increasing residue levels in food. Roundup is now found in GMO soybeans intended for food use at levels that
even Monsanto used to call "extreme" (Bhn et al. 2014).

The two new herbicide-resistance traits are set to recapitulate this same story of increasing agrochemical use. But they will
also amplify it significantly.

The specifics are worth considering. First, the spraying of 2,4-D and Dicamba on the newer herbicide-resistant crops will not
eliminate the need for Roundup, whose use will not decline (see Figure). That is because, unlike Roundup, neither 2,4-D nor
Dicamba are broad-spectrum herbicides. They will have to be sprayed together with Roundup, or with each other (or all of
them together) to kill all weeds. This vital fact has not been widely appreciated.
Confirmation comes from the companies themselves. Monsanto is stacking (i.e. combining) Dicamba resistance with
Roundup resistance in its Xtend crops and Dow is stacking 2,4-D resistance with Roundup resistance in its Enlist range.
(Notably, resistance to other herbicides, such as glufosinate, are being stacked in all these GMO crops too.)

The second issue is that the combined spraying of 2,4-D and Dicamba and Roundup, will only temporarily ease the weed
resistance issues faced by farmers. In the medium and longer terms, they will compound the problems. That is because
new herbicide-resistant weeds will surely evolve.

In fact, Dicamba-resistant and 2,4-D-resistant weeds already exist. Their spread, and the evolution of new ones, can be
guaranteed (Mortensen et al 2012). This will bring greater profits for herbicide manufacturers, but it will also bring greater
PR problems for GMOs and the food industry. GMO soybeans and corn will likely soon have "extreme levels" of at least
three different herbicides, all of them with dubious safety records (Schinasi and Leon 2014).

The first time round, Monsanto and Syngenta's PR snow-jobs successfully obscured this, not just from the general public,
but even within agronomy. But it is unlikely they will be able to do so a second time. 2,4-D and Dicamba-resistant GMOs are
thus a PR disaster waiting to happen.

A pipeline full of problems: risk and perception

The longer term problem for GMOs is that, despite extravagant claims, their product pipeline is not bulging with promising
ideas. Mostly, it is more of the same: herbicide resistance and insect resistance.

The most revolutionary and innovative part of that pipeline is a technology and not a trait. Many products in the GMO
pipeline are made using RNA interference technologies that rely on double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs). dsRNA is a
technology with two problems. One is that products made with it (such as the "Arctic" Apple, the "Innate" Potato, and
Monsanto's "Vistive Gold" Soybeans) are unproven in the field. Like its vanguard, a Brazilian virus-resistant bean, they
may never work under actual farming conditions.

But if they do work, there is a clear problem with their safety which is explained in detail here (pdf).

In outline, the problem is this: the long dsRNA molecules needed for RNA interference were rejected long ago as being too
hazardous for routine medical use (Anonymous, 1969). The scientific literature even calls them "toxins", as in this paper title
from 1969: Absher M., and Stinebring W. (1969) Toxic properties of a synthetic double-stranded RNA. Nature 223: 715-717.
(not online)
As further evidence of this, long dsRNAs are now used in medicine to cause autoimmune disorders in mice, in order to study
these disorders (Okada et al 2005).

The Absher and Stinebring paper comes from a body of research built up many years ago, but its essential findings have
been confirmed and extended by more modern research. We now know why dsRNAs cause harm. They trigger destructive
anti-viral defence pathways in mammals and other vertebrates and there is a field of specialist research devoted to showing
precisely how this damages individual cells, whole tissues, and results in auto-immune disease in mice (Karpala et al.
2005).

The conclusion therefore, is that dsRNAs that are apparently indistinguishable from those produced in, for example,
the Arctic apple and Monsanto's Vistive Gold Soybean, have strong negative effects on vertebrate animals (but not plants).

These vertebrate effects are found even at low doses.

Consumers are vertebrate animals. They may not appreciate the thought that their healthy fats and forever apples also
contain proven toxins. And on a business front, consumer brands will not relish defending dsRNA technology once they
understand the reality. They may not wish to find themselves defending the indefensible.

The bottom line is this. Either dsRNAs will sicken or kill people, or, they will give opponents of biotechnology plenty of
ammunition. The scientific evidence, as it currently stands, suggests they will do both. dsRNAs, therefore, are a potentially
huge liability.

The last pipeline problem stems from the first two. The agbiotech industry has long held out the prospect of "consumer
benefits" from GMOs. Consumer benefits (in the case of food) are most likely to be health benefits (improved nutrition,
altered fat composition, etc.). The problem is that the demographic of health-conscious consumers no doubt overlaps
significantly with the demographic of those most wary of GMOs.

Show a consumer a "healthy GMO" and they are likely to show you an oxymoron. The health market in the US for
customers willing to pay more for a GMO has probably evaporated in the last few years as GMOs have become a hot public
issue.

The end-game for GMOs?

The traditional chemical industry approach to such a problem is a familiar repertoire of intimidation and public relations.

Fifty years ago, the chemical industry outwitted and out-manoeuvered environmentalists after the death of Rachel Carson
(see the books Toxic Sludge is Good for You and Trust Us We're Experts). But that was before email, open access
scientific publication, and the internet. Monsanto and its allies have steadily lost ground in a world of peer-to-peer
communication. GMOs have become a liability, despite their best efforts.

The historic situation is this: in any country, public acceptance of GMOs has always been based on lack of awareness of
their existence. Once that ignorance evaporates and the scientific and social realities start to be discussed, ignorance cannot
be reinstated. From then on the situation moves into a different, and much more difficult phase for the defenders of GMOs.
Nevertheless, in the US, those defenders have not yet given up. Anyone who keeps up with GMOs in the media knows that
the public is being subjected to an unrelenting and concerted global blitzkrieg.

Pro-GMO advocates and paid-for journalists, presumably financed by the life-science industry, sometimes fronted by non-
profits such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, are being given acres of prominent space to make their case.

Liberal media outlets such as the New York Times, the National Geographic, The New Yorker, Grist
magazine, the Observer newspaper, and any others who will have them (which is most) have been deployed to spread its
memes. Cornell University has meanwhile received a $5.6 million grant by the Gates Foundation to "depolarize" negative
GMO publicity.

But so far there is little sign that the growth of anti-GMO sentiment in Monsanto's home (US) market can be halted. The
decision by Chipotle is certainly not an indication of faith that it can.

For Monsanto and GMOs the situation suddenly looks ominous. Chipotle may well represent the beginnings of a market
swing of historic proportions. GMOs may be relegated to cattle-feed status, or even oblivion, in the USA. And if GMOs fail in
the US, they are likely to fail elsewhere.

GMO roll-outs in other countries have relied on three things: the deep pockets of agribusinesses based in the United
States, their political connections, and the notion that GMOs represent "progress". If those three disappear in the United
States, the power to force open foreign markets will disappear too. The GMO era might suddenly be over.

Stevia Hailed By Overpopulation Propagandists As An Anti-Fertility Agent?

May 29 2015 | From: YouTube

Maybe it's not so sweet now... If you've thought stevia, the natural alternative to sugar and artificial
sweetners with aspartame, et al., is too good to be true, there may be a catch.
Check out this textbook written in 1970 by Paul and Anne Ehrlich, the precursor to the textbook Ecoscience they
wrote with Obama Science Czar John P. Holdren seven years later.

The book advocates all manner of horrors to depopulate what they consider an overpopulated world, including everything
from adding sterilants to the water and food to producing a sterilizing virus that requires a vaccine antidote one could apply
for... it's a nightmare.

As such, it was pretty shocking to find a passage where the authors excitedly discuss using stevia rebaudiana the same
sweet leaf hailed everywhere today as a wonderful, healthy sugar alternative as an anti-fertility agent. What's more, it had
apparently been used traditionally by indigenous Indian populations in Paraguay for a long time, and rats in studies had
shown a large drop in fertility after being administered stevia...

EcoScience: Authored in 1977 advocates for extreme totalitarian measures to control the
population
Click here to download the pdf to Ecoscience

p796: One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption -
especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single
mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate
her ability to support and care for it.

Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in
recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single
women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.

p787-8: Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most
proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficultpolitical, legal, and social questions, to
say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development.

To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective,
despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among
individuals; it must befree of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite
sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.

p838: In todays world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates
other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law
not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?

P942-3: Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might
eventually be developed into a Planetary Regimesort of an international superagency for population, resources,
and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration,
conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international
implications exist.
Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such
freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans.The
Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance
from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.

The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for
each region and for arbitrating various countries shares within their regional limits. Control of population size
might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed
limits.

More examples and specific page numbers to checkout can be found here.

Psychiatric Drugs Kill 500,000+ Western Adults Annually, Few Positive Benefits
Leading Scientist
May 15 2015 | From: RT

Psychiatric drugs lead to the deaths of over 500,000 people aged 65 and over annually in the West,
a Danish scientist says. He warns the benefits of these drugs are minimal, and have been vastly
overstated.

Research director at Denmarks Nordic Cochrane Centre, Professor Peter Gtzsche, says the use of most
antidepressants and dementia drugs could be halted without inflicting harm on patients. The Danish scientists
views were published in the British Medical Journal on Tuesday.

His scathing analysis will likely prove controversial among traditional medics. However, concern is mounting among doctors
and scientists worldwide that psychiatric medication is doing more harm than good. In particular, they say antipsychotic
drugs have been overprescribed to many dementia patients in a bid to calm agitated behavior.

Gtzsche warns psychiatric drugs kill patients year in year out, and hold few positive benefits. He says in excess of half a
million citizens across the Western world aged 65 and over die annually as a result of taking these drugs.
 Their benefits would need to be colossal to justify this, but they are minimal,he writes.

Given their lack of benefit, I estimate we could stop almost all psychotropic drugs without causing harm.

Gtzsche, who is also a clinical trials expert, says drug trials funded by big pharmaceutical companies tend to produce
biased results because many patients took other medication prior to the tests.

He says patients cease taking the old drugs and then experience a phase of withdrawal prior to taking the trial
pharmaceuticals, which appear highly beneficial at first.

The Danish professor also warns fatalities from suicides in clinical trials are significantly under-reported.

In the case of antidepressants venlafaxine and fluoxetine, Gtzsche casts doubt over their efficacy. He said depression lifts
in placebo groups given fake tablets almost as promptly as groups who partake in official clinical tests.

He also stressed the results of trials of drugs used to treat schizophrenia are disconcerting, while those for ADHD are
ambiguous. Commenting on the negative side effects of such pharmaceutical drugs, Gtzsche argued the short-term
relief appears to be replaced by long term harm.

Animal studies strongly suggest that these drugs can produce brain damage, which is probably the case for all
psychotropic drugs, he said.

Given their lack of benefit, I estimate we could stop almost all psychotropic drugs without causing harm by
dropping all antidepressants, ADHD drugs and dementia drugs and using only a fraction of the antipsychotics
and benzodiazepines we currently use.

This would lead to healthier and more long-lived populations.

Gtzsche says psychotropic drugs are immensely harmful if used for prolonged periods.

They should almost exclusively be used in acute situations and always with a firm plan for tapering off, which can
be difficult for many patients, he adds.

Gtzsches views are sharply contradicted by many experts in the field of mental health. But others, including a diverse
group of medical experts and institutions affiliated with the Nordic Cochrane Centre, argue otherwise. The Nordic Cochrane
Centre is an independent research hub dedicated to scrutinizing and monitoring the effects of health care.

The debate on psychiatric drugs has gathered momentum in recent times. In the discussion, published in the British Medical
Journal (BMJ), Gtzsches arguments are contradicted by Professor of Mood Disorders Allan Young and John Crace. Crace,
himself a psychiatric patient, writes for the Guardian.
US spends most on this drug and no one knows how it works

Crace and Young say a broad body of research indicates the drugs are effective and that they are just as helpful as drugs for
other ailments. They also argue mental health conditions are the fifth most significant contributor to disabilities worldwide.

While Gtzsche stresses clinical trials bankrolled by pharma giants churn out skewered results, Young and Crace say the
efficacy and safety of psychiatric medication continues to be monitored after research trials come to a close.

However, both Young and Crace acknowledge concern over the side effects and effectiveness of psychiatric medication.

For some critics, the onus often seems to be on the drug needing to prove innocence from causing harm rather
than a balanced approach to evaluating the available evidence, they write.

Whether concerns are genuine or an expression of prejudice is not clear, but over time many concerns have been
found to be overinflated.

The BMJ discussion is a preamble to the Maudsley debate at Kings College London on Wednesday. The debate takes place
three times a year at the universitys Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN).

Wednesdays debate focuses on the impacts of psychiatric medications, and poses the question of whether they prove more
destructive for patients than beneficial.

Conquer Fear And Live Free!

May 13 2015 | From: MyEClinik

Are we really helpless? Are you tired of watching the constant barrage of men in yellow suits
transporting Ebola carriers from Africa? Due to our relative ignorance about its basic internal
operations, we are left without any viable option other than to seek professional help at the
slightest symptoms of a disease.

The discussion about our own anatomy, i.e. healthcare in particular, is heavily mystified, and deliberately
complicated; it tends to sever us from fully understanding the whole subject. Moreover, there is seemingly a
concerted effort to disrespect the sanctity of the human body itself.

But is healthcare really that hard to learn?

Besides, when government and relevant institutions seem to be lacking the needed resolve to end the problem, isn't it time
for us to act and do something? Isn't it time for us to bypass the Middlemen?

Anatomy Simplified

We were taught that the human body is a very complex assembly of a gazillion delicate parts, and learning about them may
take a lifetime. It may be true if the goal is to manipulate or modify their inherent forms and functions.
But if the objective is healthcare then our job is
undoubtedly much simpler. Here's why...

When it comes to taking care of our own body, there are

only three (3) things that we must be aware of:

Auto-Immune System

The immune system is a complex defense mechanism

which protects us from any parasitic infection, e.g. viral,
bacterial, pathogenic.

It is doing this critical function continuously and even

without our conscious will to do it.

Homeostasis

Homeostasis is the bodys self-regulating process which

maintains chemical balance among others, to maintain
stability while dynamically adjusting to conditions that are
optimal for survival.

Just like the auto-immune system, it is doing this critical

function continuously without our conscious will to do it.
Auto-Regeneration

To some degree, our own body has the ability to repair itself, e.g. wound and fracture healing, and just like the first two
critical features, it is doing this nature's wonder without our conscious will to do it.

What do they mean?

Our body knows exactly how to take good care of itself, every single cell in it, and we dont need to be an expert to help it
cure whatever ailment it may be suffering from.

All we need to do is refrain from aggravating any undesirable condition by avoiding the use of chemicals and radioactive
diagnostics, and never undergo any invasive surgery except in extreme cases of physical trauma.

Eventually, the human body develops resistance to an infection by producing antibodies. Similarly, the human body will also
develop resistance to any toxic chemicals including those coming from administered antibiotics themselves!

These are natural immunoresponse mechanisms that should not be attenuated by any artificial means. The discovery of
antibiotic resistance spells the end of modern medicine as we knew it.

Disease Demystified

The mainstream discussion about every diseases is so overblown; it is flooded with fatalistic statistics rather than the honest
exploration of the solution itself.

The overall effect is the birth of unwarranted fear and panic which would then create a "need for institutionalized expert
advice" and subsequent chemical, or invasive interventions. The conventional modalities effectively bypass intelligent and
scientific home-based alternatives.

However, it is important to understand that there used to be only three (3) general causes of human ailments. But recent
findings indicate a new and deceptive cancer inducing weapon has arrived:
Parasites

All live organisms that feed through our body for their own
survival are considered collectively as parasites.

We keep accumulating them from the day we were born,

and throughout the years we've been breathing life on this
planet.

Toxic Chemicals

Any chemicals that are taken excessively or those that

should not have been in our body in the first place are
considered toxic and should be removed by a method that
truly neutralizes them for good.

Energy Depletion

Inadequate rest and bad nutrition deplete the energy

supply, which the immune system and all other systems
require for their proper and optimal operation.

This is the primary cause by which our body's auto-defense

and auto-repair mechanisms become dysfunctional.

Electromagnetic Pollution

The use of mobile wireless gadgets like cell phones and

tablets has brought us convenience in the way we
communicate and conduct our business.

But the grave dangers of its prolonged use are just

beginning to surface.

More
What does it mean?

There is no such thing as a spontaneous cellular deterioration. All diseases are caused and our body has the ability to cure
itself from them.

Every cell in the body, being the fundamental unit of life, has enough intelligence to take good care of itself. It has the ability
to breathe from freshly oxygenated blood, feed from available nutrients and excrete waste by itself. It also has the versatility
to transform itself into whatever tissue that any organ requires, e.g. wound healing, bone fracture.

All human cells die off only when oxygen and nutrient supplies are depleted, or is subjected to persistent parasitic attack and
chemical intoxication, and not of aging. It is the imperfection of its environment that causes it to fail, rather than our illusory
perception of the passing of time.

The human body can suffer only when there is a sustained parasitic replication, massive chemical intoxication, and
inadequate supply of energy, in which time all three critical systems (i.e. auto-immune, homeostasis, and auto-regeneration),
will start to fail and diseases will start to manifest.

And the only logical solutions are those non-toxic, non-invasive treatments that the mainstream institutions cannot provide,
or are hesitant to do so.

"Does it make sense if i told you, Youre really sick. Ive got an idea, let me poison you?

- Dr. Thomas Lodi

Logical Treatments

The most logical treatments for any disease of whatever severity should exclude the use of toxic chemicals and radioactive
diagnostics. They should not include invasive surgery either because it would affect the normal operations of the organs, as
delicate nerves are needlessly cut-off, and neural communication is impractically severed.

The most logical treatments should have the following characteristics:

It should enhance the operation of the immune system and not hamper the normal operation of the organs which could
make recovery possible.

It should promote chemical balance rather than aggravate it further through a trial and error, carpet bombing scheme via
measured doses of poison casually labeled as antibiotics.

Above all, the treatments should respect the inherent expertise of the body in restoring its normal condition by itself.

All the cells that make up the whole organism called human being have mastered the art of survival long before we
discovered their existence and identified some of their functions. In fact, we have yet to fully understand and determine what
they are truly capable of.

"I worked in the Pharmaceutical industry that do nothing but annihilate the population of this world."

- Dr. John Rengen Virapen

What does it mean?

Our philosophy is simple: Allow the body to cure itself naturally as it is more intelligent than we will ever be in defending itself
from any diseases, and only use interventions which avoid worsening the condition; Strictly, avoid those which may have
caused the ailments in the first place.

Do these logical treatments exist?

Yes, they've been here all along, and some of the reasons why they are not made available are that they are too easy, less
costly to implement and would surely affect the profitability of "healthcare" companies, and drastically reduce the tax
collection of the government.

Beyond adequate nutrition, sufficient rest, and regular exercise, which should eliminate energy depletion as a primary factor
contributing to the reduction of our resistance to all forms of disease, the most logical treatments only involve the right
application of Basic Science, like so:

Chemical Neutralization
Neutralizing Heavy Metal Intoxication
There are at least three (3) most common causes of
chemical intoxication: Another problem causing chemical intoxication is heavy
metals, and there is a saner approach on how to effectively
High level of acidity deal with them, that isn't subject to erratic availability once
Heavy metals the gadget is already in your home.
Radioactivity
This gadget is called ozonizer.
Neutralizing High Acidity & Radioactivity

If a person is sickly, there's a very high chance that his

blood pH is lower than normal, i.e. acidic. In fact, most
cancer patients do.

Based on the chart below, the antidote to acid is alkaline or

base. So, in order to raise your pH towards alkalinity you
need to have an alkaline diet, or a controlled intake of
alkaline salt like baking soda.

The idea is to strike a pH balance as recommended on the

chart below.

Normally, our urine pH should be between 6.5 to 8.0 pH.

Ozonizer produces triatomic oxygen (known as ozone) on

demand, and it is very useful in oxidizing or breaking down
any metal upon contact.

That is the reason why we need to put oil on any machinery

to prevent contact with oxygen in ambient air, thereby avoid
rusting.

Normally, our blood pH should be a bit higher than neutral;

7.41 pH is recommended.
Remember, the above values will be maintained
automatically for you by your own body through a process
known as homeostasis, and it is only during organ infection
and energy depletion when this mechanism could fail, in
which case the following intervention would become
necessary.
Shown above is a procedure to verify that acid, vinegar in this case,
can be neutralized with alkaline salt like baking soda. The mixture will
result to bubbles of carbon dioxide and salty water, both of which are
easier to flush out from the body.
Any acid can be neutralized by using baking soda, an
alkaline salt. With careful monitoring, your acidic blood pH
can be normalized by taking in appropriate amount of
baking soda solution, making the blood inhospitable to any
parasite.
It is also being used in hospital patients intravenously when
undergoing chemotherapy, to protect them from its
hazardous toxicity. So, why not bypass chemotherapy
altogether?
70% of doctors surveyed don't even want to take
chemotherapy in case they themselves are afflicted with
cancer.
Beyond that, baking soda molecule Na2CO3 readily binds
with uranium atom thereby protecting the kidneys from the
effects of radiation during a nuclear fallout.
If an entire metal train car disintegrates with constant
exposure to air containing oxygen, why not the heavy
metals causing cancer inside our body?
Ozone is triatomic oxygen; it has one unstable atom that
readily attaches to other element to oxidize it.
It turns out, we're not only neutralizing heavy metals but
can also suffocate any parasite just by ozonizing our
drinking water.
Parasites have smaller capacity for handling oxygen than
the host.
Ozone is guaranteed to neutralize not just Ebola but all
other viruses and beyond.
Moreover, we are also neutralizing acidity even further by
the addition of more oxygen atoms into the whole equation.
So, how great would that be when components of the
whole protocol work in complementary to each other to
achieve an objective?
Even better, the whole protocol is the most natural set of
complementary treatments there is, i.e. baking soda,
ozone, electricity, they all exist naturally.
Even our own pancreas is producing sodium bicarbonate to
regulate acidity in our digestive system, aside from
producing insulin.
When the pancreas is infected by parasites, it won't be able
to perform these functions effectively.
Diabetic patients should, therefore, explore the possibility
of directly reinforcing the supply of sodium bicarbonate into
their system, while actively electrocuting the worms
colonizing their pancreas.
Parasite Neutralization
In 1903, Edison publicly electrocuted dozens of animals,
including an elephant, to prove his point that Nikola Teslas
alternating current is deadly and that his direct current
power system is safer.
Thomas Edison
In the process, he also proved our thesis, i.e. any type of
parasite lurking inside our own body can be neutralized at
will without chemical intoxication by using electric current.
Unfortunately for him, he lost the "war of the currents" to
the more economically and technically superior alternating
current [AC] system that we still use to power our homes
and industries today.
It is important to understand that when blood is freed from
all types of parasites, more than 2000 neuropeptides will
return, among them is interferon, which interferes the
growth of cancer cells. When this happens, the normal
capability of the auto-immune system could return ensuring
complete remission later on.\
Allowing your own immune system to recover first and let it
naturally work for you is probably the best strategy you
could ever have.
One should also understand that having the blood
thoroughly cleansed of all parasites is just half of the task.
Through a regular physical workout that suits your current
physical condition, your blood must be delivered into all
extremities and deep recesses of your body where it could
perform its functions, i.e. deliver nutrients, detect presence
of and neutralize parasites, extract wastes and toxins.
Based on our own experience, the strategy fails only when
patients take detoxification procedure for granted.
Electrocuting Parasites
There's only one feasible way of neutralizing all types of
parasites with one treatment, and that is the use of electric
current, and we only need a weaker voltage to accomplish
it, and not the dangerously high electrical pressure that
Edison employed.
The smaller the parasite, the weaker the voltage needed to
put the adversary into a devastating electric shock, giving
ample time for the liver and kidneys to flush the parasite
out of the system.
The beauty of this method is that, it won't have adverse
effects on our healthy blood cells and tissues, and it won't
discriminate any certain type of parasite. It neutralizes them
all.
Shown above is a simple diagram of parasite electrification. In practice,
alternating DC pulses will be used.
Realizing that you can electrocute all types of parasites on
demand at the flip of a switch, for what do you need
vaccines for?
Electrification of the blood alters the protein layer of any
type of parasites flowing thereto, effectively neutralizing
and preventing them from replicating any further until all of
these parasites are flushed out through the liver and
kidneys.
WARNING
It is very important to flush all toxins, e.g. neutralized
parasites, out from the body before the next treatment
session.
This can be done by drinking generous amounts of
ozonized water.
Otherwise, permanent liver and kidney damage are to be
expected due to the accumulation of neutralized parasites
and other toxins clogging these organs.
Neutralizing parasites is the easy part; drinking water So, don't ever try this procedure if you are not fully
generously and doing regular exercise are hard for some, committed.
and they are bound to fail.

What does it mean?

All chemicals and parasites can be neutralized at will using Elementary Science. When the body is freed from the primary
causes of disease, i.e. quick replicating parasites and toxic chemicals, the body could focus more on the healing process
and complete remission is thereby ensured, as what we have actually experienced, and the reason why Dr. Kaali was
awarded a patent for the validity of such method.

Of course, a typical doctor that he is, he employed an invasive method in electrifying the blood, the core component of the
immune system.

There is a different approach that doesn't involve invasive blood extraction, and we have written an entire eBook about how
you can effectively do it on your own, and all other information that you might need in order to implement the whole protocol
successfully.

To continue reading click here.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. On Vaccines: Big Pharma Has Captured The Scientific,
Regulatory, Law-Making Processes
May 3 2015 | From: GlobalResearch / NaturalNews

In this address given on the California Capitol steps in Sacramento Robert Kennedy Jr. provides an
inspired and detailed analysis of the extent to which the powerful pharmaceutical cartel has
effectively captured the nations scientific, regulatory, and law-making processes.

Related: Australia wants to make vaccines mandatory: Historical Negligence:

Flu vaccination ban goes national after fever, convulsions in children

Combined with the corporate news medias dependence on drug advertising, this has put big pharma in a position
where it is running roughshod over informed choice and dictating vaccine policies that have little-if-any basis in
scientific research yet will greatly contribute to that industrys already gargantuan profits.

This is Robert F. Kennedy Jrs speech at the SB277 rally that took place in Sacramento, California at the State Capitol on
April 8, 2015.

Kennedy offers an example of scientist and pediatrician Paul Offit, the developer of the rotavirus vaccine, whose personal
stake in vaccines development and adoption is emblematic of the monied practices tending to corrupt vaccine science in
America today. In 1999 he sat on the [CDC] committee that added the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule. Kennedy notes,

"At the time he was working on his own rotavirus vaccine. Opening that gateway, by adding that vaccine to the
schedule, made his patent extremely valuable. Six years later he sold that patent for $182 million and pocketed
about $40 million for himself. So, that kind of financial entanglement by the people to hare deciding what vaccines
to add to the schedule makes it difficult, I think, for all of us to think that they only thing theyre thinking of is our
childrens health."

He concluded his remarks by emphasizing that legislation such as Californias SB277 takes away the last barrier between
the pharmaceutical companies bottom line mentality and childrens healthparental discretion itself.

"All of the barriers that are meant to protect our childrenthe government, the lawyers, the regulatory agencies, and
the press, the checks and balances in our democratic system that are supposed to stand between corporate power
and our little childrenhave been removed, and theres only one barrier left, and thats the parents, and we need to
keep that in the equation."

Robert Kennedy, Jr. Is Right About Vaccines:

A Medically Induced 'Holocaust' Is Now Upon Us

At a recent screening of the powerful new documentary film Trace Amounts, which exposes the scientific connection
between mercury in vaccines and autism, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. warned an audience of supportive viewers that vaccines
are essentially poison vials causing a "holocaust" in our country.

The nephew of former U.S. president John F. Kennedy, RFK Jr. attended the screening in solidarity with California parents
who are fighting to stop Senate Bill 277 from eliminating their freedom as Californians to exempt their children from
"mandatory" vaccinations. Speaking to the crowd, Kennedy emphasized the proven dangers of vaccines.

"They can put anything they want in that vaccine and they have no accountability for it," stated Kennedy about the vaccine
industry, which ironically maintains its own exclusive and unconstitutional exemption from legal liability for vaccines that
injure and kill children.

Trace Amounts helped kill anti-freedom vaccine exemption elimination bill in Oregon Both entering
and leaving the stage to exuberant standing ovations, Kennedy lauded Trace Amounts for helping persuade lawmakers in
Oregon to scrap a bill similar to California's SB 277 that would have eliminated personal vaccine exemptions in the Beaver
State.

He also empathized with parents of vaccine-injured children, who often have no support from the legal system, and
sometimes even from their friends and family members, in addressing the damage caused by vaccine quackery.

"They get the shot, that night they have a fever of a hundred and three, they go to sleep, and three months later their brain is
gone," lamented Kennedy about how vaccine injuries progress. "This is a holocaust, what this is doing to our country."

Not a single invited politician shows up to Trace Amounts screening

California lawmakers were reportedly also invited to the Trace Amounts screening where Kennedy spoke, with three rows
specially cordoned off for their convenient viewing. But according to The Sacramento Bee, not a single lawmaker showed
up except for a handful of random staffers. No bother, though, as the film was still shown, and the crowd invigorated to take
a unified stand for medical freedom.

89.3 KPCC is now reporting that the proposed legislation SB 277 would unconstitutionally deprive unvaccinated children
from receiving an adequate education by preventing them from attending public school. Its supporters, however, are
planning to reintroduce it once again in the coming days.

Vaccines are a scam, and the government's revolving door with the vaccine industry proves it has
no business trying to pass anti-exemption laws

As far as the idea of eliminating vaccine exemptions, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that those trying to push anti-
exemption legislation work for or are being paid off by the vaccine industry.

"The former head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding, is now the head of the Merck Vaccine Division," wrote one commenter
at The Sacramento Bee concerning this issue. "The government is having a dirty little affair with the drug industry."

"They share ownership of patents. They created the unconstitutional 'Vaccine Court' that usurps our 7th Amendment and
shields drug manufacturers from liability. The phony court has no judge, no jury and no justice for most people. They cherry
pick cases to keep liability down and lie about the real number of vaccine injuries, yet they have still paid out about 3 billion
dollars for the injuries they will admit to."

Check out this vaccine debate that aired on PBS Hawaii, in which the show's producers and hosts failed to mention its
sponsorship from Merck, Pfizer and various other vaccine manufacturers:
WaronWeThePeople.com.

The Medical Cartel: Too Big To Fail, Too Evil To Expose

April 28 2015 | From: JonRappoport

There are several reasons why the medical cartel is too big to fail: the enormous amount of money
at stake; its aim to control populations.
In this article, I want to examine a related reason. Suppose it was discovered that thousands of bridges around the
US were in imminent danger of collapsing? Not because maintenance and repair were lacking, not because the
materials used to build them were cheap and shoddy. But because the original designs were inadequate and broke
basic rules of engineering.

Suppose five or six major manufacturers built their automobiles so the vast majority of power derived from the engines was
transferred to one wheel? Suppose the US Dept. of Agriculture recommended that all farmers spray their crops with heavy
chlorine instead of water?

In other words, the science itself is fraudulent.

This revelation, above all, is what the medical cartel tries to guard against. Their profession has shoved in all its chips on the
propaganda proposition that it does impeccable science.

Science sells. The appearance of it sells. Its the foundation stone of many industries.

Were that stone to crack and shatter, all bets would be off. A titanic fraud would come to light. The kind of fraud that would
both freeze peoples minds and blow them away.

Science is the most powerful rationalization in the modern world. Consensus reality would fail and disperse without it.

As Ive covered before, the most conservative mainstream estimate of medically caused death in America is 225,000 people
per year.

Every credential behind that figure is immaculate.

The author of the paper that presented the statistics was the late Dr. Barbara Starfield, a revered public health expert who
worked for many years at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.

Her review, Is US health the best in the world?, was published on July 26th, 2000, in the Journal of the American Medical
Association.

Starfields breakdown was as follows: the medical system kills 119,000 people a year in the US as a result of maltreatment in
hospitals. The other 106,000 people are killed by FDA-approved medicines.

The FDA must approve every drug as safe and effective before it is released for public use.
Its the medicines I want to focus on in this article. 106,000 deaths a year translates to an astonishing 1,060,000 deaths per
decade.

How are these drugs approved?

Clinical trials are conducted. Reports of those trials are written. The reports, the studies, are published in peer-reviewed
medical journals. The studies ARE the science.

If a million people per decade are being killed by the drugs, then a huge number of published studies proclaiming the drugs
are safe are sheer fraud. There is no other way to put it.

This statement from Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, echoes the fact:

It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment
of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached
slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.

(Marcia Angell, MD, The New York Review of Books, January 15, 2009, Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption)

The medical cartel rests on cataclysmic fraud, scientific fraud.

Imagine what would happen if just one major media outlet decided to take on this story and push it for all its worth. Not
merely an article or two - an ongoing campaign of relentless exposure.

The silence from that quarter speaks volumes about the controlled press and what it stands for.

Over the years, Ive written much about the the FDA. I thought Id assemble a small fraction of it in one place, to reveal what
this federal agency is really all about and why it should be dismantled, amid a blizzard of prosecutions and convictions for
negligent homicide and, yes, murder.

The discovery of a page, on the FDAs own website, proves the FDA is fully aware that the drugs it certifies as safe have
been killing Americans, at the rate of 100,000 per year.

The FDA website page is available under the heading, Why Learn About Adverse Drug Reactions. You can search for it
using the Startpage.com search engine.

The FDA takes no blame, no responsibility for its own actions, and yet it admits the death statistics are accurate.

Understand this very clearly. No medical drug in America can be released for public use until and unless the FDA states it is
safe. The FDA is the agency that makes every such decision on every drug. The buck stops there.

Yes, the FDA has a special relationship with the pharmaceutical industry. Yes, the FDA utilizes doctors on their drug-
approval panels that have ties to the pharmaceutical industry. But, in the end, it is the FDA official seal that opens the gate
and permits a drug to be prescribed by doctors and sold in the US.

In all my research on this medical-drug holocaust, I have never found a case in which any FDA employee was censured,
fired, or criminally prosecuted for the killing effects of these drugs.

That is a track record Organized Crime would be proud of, and the comparison is not frivolous.

On this FDA website page, the FDA also readily admits that medical drugs are the fourth leading cause of death in America,
ahead of pulmonary disease, diabetes, AIDS, pneumonia, accidents, and automobile fatalities.
The FDA website page also states there are 2 million serious adverse reactions (ADRs) from the ingestion of medical drugs,
annually, in the US. That would be 20 million ADRs per decade.

When the FDA says serious, they arent talking about headaches or slight dizziness or temporary nausea. Serious means
stroke, heart attack, neurological damage; destruction of that magnitude.

Examining these figures for death and debilitation, can you find any comparable documented crime in the American
landscape? This is the kind of story that would make Watergate look like a Sunday-school picnic.

If a paper like the New York Times let loose their hounds to relentlessly explore the horror, I assure you that, in time, doctors
and medical bureaucrats and even drug-company employees would come out of the woodwork with confessions, and the
resultant explosions and outcries would shake the medical/pharmaceutical foundations of America and the planet.

It would shake and destroy the SCIENCE.

But these major media outlets are an intrinsic part of the Matrix that protects and sustains the crimes and the criminals. It
isnt just drug-advertising profits that keep the leading newspapers and television networks silent. Its collusion to protect a
revered institution - the medical system.

Read the full story at: JonRappoport

New Zealander Of The Year: Refuse Vaccines, Lose Money

April 21 2015 | From: JonRappoport

New Zealander of the Year: refuse vaccination, lose money. Naturally, hes a doctor
Prime Minister John Key with Dr. Lance OSullivan

Following in the footsteps of Australia (see: Australia: refuse vaccination, lose $15,000), 2014 New Zealander of the
Year, Dr. Lance OSullivan, wants to punish people who dont get vaccinated.

The New Zealand Herald (4/15) reports in Leading GP [general practitioner (medical doctor)] Lance OSullivan: Parents
compelled to vaccinate:

"A leading New Zealand doctor has called on the Government to follow Australias example to cut child welfare
payments to families who do not vaccinate their children, saying the policy would help protect the most vulnerable in
our society.

OSullivan should know better. He works with poverty-stricken families. He leads an initiative to build houses for the poor.
(I encourage you to read the above referenced New Zealand Herald article in its entirety).

The issue is not vaccines, when it comes to illness among his patients.

Its weakened immune systems. Which means: lack of nutritious food; lack of proper sanitation; overcrowding;
poverty; pollution; in the case of indigenous peoples, stolen land; toxic medical drugs and yes, toxic vaccines.

It doesnt matter how much medical care you force on people living in these circumstances. They will get sick. They will suffer.
They will die.
Vaccines might obscure the visible symptoms of some diseases and allow doctors to conclude the shots are working, but a)
the vaccines are actually increasing the toxic load on the body; b) the people who are vaccinated will inevitably break out with
new symptoms; and c) the vaccines wont cure the obvious reasons (listed above) for immune-system suppression.

You cant substitute vaccines for the factors that actually strengthen immune systems. Thats a fairy tale. Dr. OSullivan is
whistling in the dark. He needs to go back and rethink his entire education. It failed to provide him with basic facts.

The circumstances of life in which his patients find themselves are causing dire illness. There is no way around that. There is
no mystery about that. There is no final medical solution for that.

The idea that doctors moving into areas where, for generations, people have lived on the margins - and making medicine
substitute for the essentials of health - that notion is absurd.

Here, son. You dont have nutritious vegetables and protein to eat, but Ill give you a shot in the arm.

A fantasy. A myth.

As for people in New Zealand who do have the essentials of life - good clean food, clean water, a warm home, plus money -
guess what? Unless they abuse themselves with junk food and drugs, unless theyre exposed to toxic factors in their
environment (e.g., pesticides), theyre in the process of strengthening their immune systems.

They dont need vaccines in order to ward off illness. When children get sick, theyll undergo a full and acute inflammatory
response, recover, and their immune systems will be stronger.

These matters arent hard to understand. Theyre only made more complex by the medical system, which needs sickness to
survive.

My vote for persons of year in New Zealand are all the people who understand these simplicities and are willing to stand up for
them.

The attack dogs for the vaccine manufacturing complex are on the move, worldwide. Theyre saying and doing
whatever they can to keep populations hypnotized and walled off from the truth about vaccines. Theyre trying to pass
more stringent legislation eliminating vaccine exemptions. Theyre aiming to coerce everyone and eliminate freedom and
choice.

Theyre saying, as Dr. OSullivan does: Were doing this for your own good. You dont see that, but it doesnt matter. We do.
And were going to take control.

Dont let this happen. Dont fall for it.

MIT Researcher: Glyphosate Herbicide Will Cause Half Of All Children To Have Autism
By 2025
April 17 2015 | From: HealthImpactNews

Why? Evidence points to glyphosate toxicity from the overuse of Monsantos Roundup herbicide
on our food.

For over three decades, Stephanie Seneff, PhD, has researched biology and technology, over the years publishing
over 170 scholarly peer-reviewed articles. In recent years she has concentrated on the relationship between
nutrition and health, tackling such topics as Alzheimers, autism, and cardiovascular diseases, as well as the
impact of nutritional deficiencies and environmental toxins on human health.

At a [recent] conference, in a special panel discussion about GMOs, she took the audience by surprise when she declared,

At todays rate, by 2025, one in two children will be autistic.

She noted that the side effects of autism closely mimic those of glyphosate toxicity, and presented data showing a
remarkably consistent correlation between the use of Roundup on crops (and the creation of Roundup-ready GMO crop
seeds) with rising rates of autism.
Children with autism have biomarkers indicative of excessive glyphosate, including zinc and iron deficiency, low serum
sulfate, seizures, and mitochondrial disorder.

A fellow panelist reported that after Dr. Seneffs presentation;

All of the 70 or so people in attendance were squirming, likely because they now had serious misgivings about
serving their kids, or themselves, anything with corn or soy, which are nearly all genetically modified and thus
tainted with Roundup and its glyphosate.

Dr. Seneff noted the ubiquity of glyphosates use. Because it is used on corn and soy, all soft drinks and candies sweetened
with corn syrup and all chips and cereals that contain soy fillers have small amounts of glyphosate in them, as do our beef
and poultry since cattle and chicken are fed GMO corn or soy.

Wheat is often sprayed with Roundup just prior to being harvested, which means that all non-organic bread and wheat
products would also be sources of glyphosate toxicity.

The amount of glyphosate in each product may not be large, but the cumulative effect (especially with as much processed
food as Americans eat) could be devastating. A recent study shows that pregnant women living near farms where pesticides
are applied have a 60% increased risk of children having an autism spectrum disorder.

Other toxic substances may also be autism-inducing. You may recall our story on the CDC whistleblower who revealed the
governments deliberate concealment of the link between the MMR vaccine (for measles, mumps, and rubella) and a sharply
increased risk of autism, particularly in African American boys.

Other studies now show a link between childrens exposure to pesticides and autism. Children who live in homes with vinyl
floors, which can emit phthalate chemicals, are more likely to have autism. Children whose mothers smoked were also twice
as likely to have autism. Research now acknowledges that environmental contaminants such as PCBs, PBDEs, and mercury
can alter brain neuron functioning even before a child is born.

This month, the USDA released a study finding that although there were detectable levels of pesticide residue in more than
half of food tested by the agency, 99% of samples taken were found to be within levels the government deems safe, and
40% were found to have no detectable trace of pesticides at all.

The USDA added, however, that due to cost concerns, it did not test for residues of glyphosate.

Lets repeat that: they never tested for the active ingredient in the most widely used herbicide in the world. Cost concerns?
How absurd - unless they mean it will cost them too much in terms of the special relationship between the USDA and
Monsanto.

You may recall the revolving door between Monsanto and the federal government, with agency officials becoming high-
paying executives - and vice versa! Money, power, prestige: its all there. Monsanto and the USDA love to scratch each
others backs. Clearly this omission was purposeful.

In addition, as we have previously reported, the number of adverse reactions from vaccines can be correlated as well with
autism, though Seneff says it doesnt correlate quite as closely as with Roundup. The same correlations between
applications of glyphosate and autism show up in deaths from senility.

Of course, autism is a complex problem with many potential causes. Dr. Seneffs data, however, is particularly important
considering how close the correlation is - and because it is coming from a scientist with impeccable credentials. Earlier this
year, she spoke at the Autism One conference and presented many of the same facts; that presentation is available on
YouTube.
Monsanto claims that Roundup is harmless to humans. Bacteria, fungi, algae, parasites, and plants use a seven-
step metabolic route known as the shikimate pathway for the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids; glyphosate
inhibits this pathway, causing the plant to die, which is why its so effective as an herbicide. Monsanto says
humans dont have this shikimate pathway, so its perfectly safe.

Dr. Seneff points out, however, that our gut bacteria do have this pathway, and thats crucial because these bacteria
supply our body with crucial amino acids.

Roundup thus kills beneficial gut bacteria, allowing pathogens to grow; interferes with the synthesis of amino acids including
methionine, which leads to shortages in critical neurotransmitters and folate; chelates (removes) important minerals like iron,
cobalt and manganese; and much more.

Even worse, she notes, additional chemicals in Roundup are untested because theyre classified asinert, yet according to a
2014 study in BioMed Research International, these chemicals are capable of amplifying the toxic effects of Roundup
hundreds of times over.

Glyphosate is present in unusually high quantities in the breast milk of American mothers, at anywhere from 760 to 1,600
times the allowable limits in European drinking water. Urine testing shows Americans have ten times the glyphosate
accumulation as Europeans.

In my view, the situation is almost beyond repair, Dr. Seneff said after her presentation. We need to do something
drastic.
Federal Government Finally Admits Cannabis Can Help Kill Cancer Cells
April 10 2015 | From: TheAntimedia

In a rare and largely unnoticed move, the federal government has admitted that cannabis is
effective in shrinking certain types of cancer cells.

The unexpected and groundbreaking declaration was made in a recent update to a National Institute on Drug
Abuse information sheet on medical marijuana.

The NIDA statement reads:

recent animal studies have shown that marijuana can kill certain cancer cells and reduce the size of others.
Evidence from one animal study suggests that extracts from whole-plant marijuana can shrink one of the most
serious types of brain tumors. Research in mice showed that these extracts, when used with radiation, increased
the cancer-killing effects of the radiation."

In addition to the NIDAs public acknowledgment, the government has made other admissions of the medical benefits of
cannabis: it holds a patent on cannabinoids for use as antioxidants and neuroprotectants. In February of this year,
the Surgeon General declared that the plant offers health benefits.

While the government has now openly admitted that cannabis can fight cancer, it should be noted that it knew this to be
true as far back as 1974. Thats when it ordered a study on the matter but blocked further research when the results proved
the plants positive potential. It suppressed similar evidence found in later federal studies conducted in the 1990s.
Regardless, the recent admissions by the surgeon general, NIDA, and Congress reflect an evolving federal stance on the
matter.

The updated NIDA fact sheet on medical marijuana also notes the effectiveness of CBD a non-psychoactive cannabinoid
in treating ailments from Alzheimers Disease, inflammation and pain to seizures, mental disorders and substance abuse.
As Tom Angell, chairman of the Marijuana Majority said;

It couldnt be any clearer that marijuana has medical valueWhen even NIDA and the surgeon general are
acknowledging that marijuana can help people who are suffering, it is time for the Obama administration to
reschedule the drug. The attorney general can initiate that process today, and theres no reason for him not to,
especially when polling shows that such a huge majority of Americans supports medical marijuana."

Ex Pharmaceutical Sales Representative Comes Clean, Reveals Horrors Of Western

Medicine
April 2 2015 | From: GlobalResearch

An ex-pharmaceutical sales rep has come clean after fifteen years of being in the drug pushing
business.

In her powerful book, Confessions of an Rx Drug Pusher, Gwen Olsen explains why she left her lucrative career
selling drugs for some of the biggest names in the business Johnson and Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and
Abbott Laboratories.

Now she passionately advocates against the pharmaceutical industry, their unethical practices, and the hundreds of
thousands of lives they lead to the grave. Gwens eyes were opened through a gradual course of tragic events.

It was an awakening process, a spiritual and consciousness process where I started observing what was
happening, what some of the drugs were doing, the misinformation, the disinformation. I was being encouraged to
minimize side effects when I talked to doctors. I started to realize that these patients were literally being tortured by
the drugs, states ex pharmaceutical rep Gwen Olsen. There is no such thing as a safe drug, she reiterates.
 Her book unveils her experience selling pharmaceuticals and the dirty secrets the industry doesnt want anyone to
know. Olsen explains that when drugs hit the market, no one knows even 50 percent of the side effects associated
with the drug. Doctors are convinced of the drugs effectiveness and their patients literally become test subjects
or lab rats for the pharmaceutical companies. Olsen even confesses, We were being trained to misinform people.

Young woman pushed over the edge by pharmaceutical drug spiral, burns herself alive

For years Gwen Olsen thought she was helping others by selling pharmaceuticals, but in 2004, a family tragedy opened her
eyes to the truth.

My niece was 20 years old, she was attending Indiana University and she was a pre-med student, an extremely
intelligent, beautiful woman, and just a beautiful spirit inside and out. She was in a car accident and was prescribed
vicodin hydrocodone for the pain, and became addicted.

The vicodin destroyed her nieces concentration, leading the young woman to turn to a stimulant drug called ephedrine. The
drug helped her stay awake long enough to study for school, but thats when she had a drug interaction.

She had a drug interaction and ended up in the hospital, and they tagged her with a bipolar disorder, not a drug
toxicity or a reaction to the drugs she was on. They started giving her more antipsychotics and mood stabilizers,
and that set her on the road to becoming a mental patient, said Olsen.

Soon thereafter, the young woman quit going to school as the side effects of the medication took hold. The more she tried to
wean herself off, the more violent the side effects became. A dependency had formed in the chemistry of her brain and the
twenty-year-old battled a severe depression.

Gwen reveals, Her mom was on her way home to take her back to the psychiatrist and get her back on drugs. [That is
when] my niece walked into her younger sisters room and took an angel lamp that was filled with oil, and poured it
over herself and ignited it, burning herself alive.

The realization struck Gwen to the core and she left her career selling pharmaceutical drugs. Now she speaks out against
the deception, telling the gripping story of her nieces suicide.

It was a promise made to her that I would not let her memory be sullied, and tell people what had happened to her.
She would not be remembered as a mentally or genetically defective person, I would not allow that to happen. And I
realize that there are thousands and thousands of people out there that need a voice, and Im serving as that
voice, she says.

A large number of psychiatrists are dishonest, because I see them giving people drugs that they know are brain
damaging therapeutics, that they know do not have positive, long-term outcomes, that they know will not cure
anything. They just take a list of symptoms and call it a mental illness or disorder.

Children are given fake diagnosis left and right and put on mind altering drugs with suicidal side effects. Psychiatrists can
diagnose mental illness today without any scientific proof. No blood tests, urine tests, or PET scans are required. The result
is millions of children are labeled and stuck on these drugs, trapped in a culture of hopelessness.
 I was so disillusioned, as well as angry, when I found out how much deception, how much misinformation was
taking place and how Id been used in that game. I literally was the one on the frontlines. I was harming people
unintentionally, but I was responsible. I carry a burden for that now.

Pick up Gwens book, Confessions of an Rx Drug Pusher, here

Natural Treatment For Depression & Other Mental Illnesses Explained Niacin (Vit. B3)
Dr. Andrew Saul
May 3 2015 | From: DoctorYourself

If youre suffering from depression, ADD, anxiety or even dementia, Autism or Alzheimers,
fortunately, there is hope!
Dr. Andrew Saul discusses the link between nutrient deficiencies/dependencies and mental illness, and how simple nutritional
supplements can correct these very serious conditions.

School Boards Left On The Hook For Wi-Fi Injuries

April 28 2015 | From: TheBridgeNewsService

School officials could be personally liable for exposing children and staff to microwave radiation in
our schools

School districts, school boards and school medical health officers have been notified that Lloyds of London has now
excluded any liability coverage for injuries;

directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic
radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise.

This would include the microwave radiation emitting from the commercial wi-fi transmitters and wireless devices in our schools.

In response to a request for clarification, this response was received on Feb. 18, 2015 from CFC Underwriting LTD, London,
UK agent for Lloyds:

The Electromagnetic Fields Exclusion (Exclusion 32) is a General Insurance Exclusion and is applied across the
 market as standard. The purpose of the exclusion is to exclude cover for illnesses caused by continuous long-
term non-ionizing radiation exposure i.e. through mobile phone usage.

Lloyds of London, one of the worlds largest insurance companies often leads the way in protection by taking on risks that no
one else will. At the end of this article there is a copy of a recent renewal policy which, as of Feb. 7, 2015, excludes any
coverage associated with exposure to non-ionizing radiation.

In 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) dropped a bombshell on the wireless industry. They
designated exposure to wi-fi radiation to be a possible human carcinogen. As well in the 1990s illnesses resulting from
asbestos exposure, covered by Lloyds at the time, almost destroyed the insurance company. Due to these issues, it appears
Lloyds is acting fast to avoid another such financial fiasco by not covering illnesses that result from exposure to wireless
radiation.

With the Lloyds of London announcement, parents and teachers are left with this question: exactly who is liable if their child is
harmed by wi-fi in their school? Concomitantly, are the individuals who approved the installation of wireless internet networks
in our schools to be held personally liable for negligence?

School officials and administrators appear to be in a bind as they have refused to acknowledge the 1000s of peer-reviewed,
non-industry funded studies by scientists and medical experts that show that wi-fi radiation is harmful, especially to children.

Moreover, their dogged allegiance to Health Canadas now invalidated safety guidelines have left parents with nowhere else to
turn other than the courts. It appears that school boards intransigent position on the issue may have left board members
themselves vulnerable to being personally sued.

School boards may be covered by directors insurance which applies to people who are performing their duties in good faith.
The question is: are they still protected when it could be shown that they were being willfully blind?

Definitions:

In good faith: in contract law, the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is a general presumption that the
parties to a contract will deal with each other honestly, fairly, and in good faith, so as to not destroy the right of the other party
or parties to receive the benefits of the contract.

Wilful blindness: (sometimes called ignorance of law, wilful ignorance or contrived ignorance or Nelsonian knowledge)
is a term used in law to describe a situation in which an individual seeks to avoid civil or criminal liability for a wrongful act by
intentionally putting him or herself in a position where he or she will be unaware of facts that would render him or her liable.

See further detail at: TheBridgeNewsService.

FDA Tries To Destroy Homeopathy - Warns Doctors, Consumers To Beware Side Effects
Of Supposedly 'Inert' Products
April 25 2015 | From: NaturalNews

Despite the fact that people have turned to homeopathic remedies for hundreds of years and enjoy
their health-boosting benefits to this day, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is coming
down hard on such products, issuing safety alerts and encouraging people to report any side
effects.
Wait a minute. If anything, many people use these products to avoid the side effects they've incurred while ingesting
or applying some physician-prescribed pill or cream in the first place.

Homeopathic remedies improve conditions, rather than make them worse, which is far more than what can be said of many
conventional approaches.

Still, the FDA forges on, adamant that anything other than what Big Pharma and mainstream head-nodders espouse to be life-
improving must be heavily scrutinized and done away with.

They're planting the "homeopathic is bad" seed in the minds of consumers and doctors using fear-based tactics such as the
one in their safety alert about homeopathic products designed to help provide asthma sufferers with some relief.

What the FDA has to say in its alert about homeopathic remedies:

"FDA is warning consumers not to rely on asthma products labeled as homeopathic that are sold over-the-counter
(OTC)," The alert begins.

What do they recommend? Surprise, surprise: prescriptions!

"Although there is no cure for asthma," the alert continues, "there are many prescription asthma
treatments approved by FDA as safe and effective, as well as some products that are marketed OTC in accordance
with an FDA monograph."

The alert uses the fact that the FDA has not evaluated homeopathic remedies for effectiveness and safety as reasoning
behind why people should turn to what they have approved, which are, of course, costly and often ineffective pharmaceuticals.

They clearly outline an us-versus-them mentality in their explanation and subsequent recommendation.
 OTC asthma products labeled as homeopathic are widely distributed through retail stores and via the internet. Many
of these products are promoted as "natural," "safe and effective," and include indications that range from treatment
for acute asthma symptoms, to temporary relief of minor asthma symptoms.

The predictable, money-making FDA recommendation:

Following is their suggestion:

RECOMMENDATION: Speak to your health care provider if you think you or your child may have asthma.
Consumers with asthma can take an active role in managing their condition by making certain they have
appropriate treatments on hand in the event they experience an asthma attack or a worsening of asthma
symptoms, and by consulting with a health care provider when needed.

From there, the FDA urges people to report any adverse reactions from homeopathic products, despite the mainstream media
and medical establishment routinely claiming such products are "inert" due to dilution:

The FDA encourages health care professionals and consumers to report any adverse reactions related to OTC
asthma care products labeled as homeopathic to the agency's MedWatch Safety Information and Adverse Event
Reporting Program....

Downloadable forms and phone numbers follow in their alert.

What the FDA is leaving out:

What the FDA doesn't mention is that homeopathic remedies have been in place for hundreds of years and that, today, people
the world over turn to them to help manage - successfully - everything from anxiety and depression to headaches and, yes,
asthma. In fact, homeopathic remedies were first introduced to the United States in 1925 and have been in use ever since.

They also don't mention that researchers from Stanford and Cornell discovered a few years back that people using Serevent,
Advair and Foradil for their asthma were "3.5 times more likely to die from asthma and 2.5 times more likely to be hospitalized
(whether or not death resulted), compared with those taking a placebo."

But homeopathic remedies, whether OTC or suggested by a homeopathic professional? Run like the wind, the FDA suggests.

How to help ensure homeopathic remedies don't fall victim to FDA naysayers:

In fact, keep an eye on April 20 and 21, 2015, as those are the dates on which the FDA is expected to hold a hearing in which
they will re-evaluate homeopathic remedies. They're poised to review regulations pertaining to the matter and, if their
aforementioned alert is any indication, it's safe to assume that they'll tout the benefits of pharmaceuticals over natural
solutions.

The hearing will be broadcast live during these dates at Collaboration.FDA.gov for those in the US interested in staying
updated on this matter.

We also encourage people in the US to voice their opinions on this issue at Regulations.gov or by writing:Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

Correspondence must be received by June 22, 2015.

Vicious Attack On Dr. Oz Actually Waged By Biotech Mafia; Plot To Destroy Oz
Launched After Episode On Glyphosate
April 21 2015 | From: NaturalNews

Dr. Oz should be given a Congressional medal of some kind for his willingness to expose the truth
about glyphosate (a component of Monsanto's Roundup) on national television.

In a recent episode that went viral, Dr. Oz discussed the toxicity of the biotech industry's favorite pesticide
"glyphosate" - a dangerous chemical that even the World Health Organization now admits likely causes cancer.

In response to this episode, the so-called "Monsanto Mafia" went berserk with all their usual character assassination tactics,
and now they've come up with a contrived plot - a campaign of intimidation and character smearing - to try to silence Dr. Oz by
destroying his credibility.

A letter signed by ten doctors - all of whom have financial ties to industry - calls for Columbia University to force Dr. Oz to
resign from the university's Department of Surgery. This letter is a tremendously educational exhibit of the mafia tactics used
by the biotech industry, as it essentially claims Dr. Oz has lost his mind and is now endangering the public.

"Whatever the nature of his pathology, members of the public are being misled and endangered, which makes Dr.
Oz's presence on the faculty of a prestigious medical institution unacceptable," the letter reads.

Of course, all the people who signed this letter have no qualms whatsoever with farmers spraying thousands of tons
of cancer-causing glyphosate herbicide chemicals on all the foods we eat.

That's perfectly acceptable to them and poses "no danger," they claim.

It is Dr. Oz and his crazy, wild, irresponsible advice that people should eat wholesome foods and take charge of their own
health that's now deemed a threat in this society... a society dominated by the financial interests of biotech and
pharmaceutical corporations that profit from sickness and disease.
The real sickness, however, is found in the fact that these "Monsanto Mafia" operatives are given any credibility at all by the
media. It doesn't take much poking around into their backgrounds to find out they're actually a gang of industry-funded junk
science egomaniacs and hucksters.

The "Monsanto Mafia" is behind the attack on Dr. Oz

This plot to destroy Dr. Oz originates with all the usual "Monsanto Mafia" suspects such as Henry Miller, the indignant biotech
puppet and Stanford biotech operative who helped run disinformation campaigns and fake science front operations for Big
Tobacco. See the full details on Henry Miller here.

Also signing the attack letter against Dr. Oz was Dr. Gilbert Ross, executive director of the American Council on Science and
Health -- a shady industry front group that spreads biotech disinformation and lies under the false label of "science."

Dr. Ross is a convicted criminal and Medicaid fraud artist. He was "convicted of racketeering, mail fraud and conspiracy," and
was "sentenced to 47 months in jail, $40,000 in forfeiture and restitution of $612,855" in a scheme to defraud the Medicaid
system, reports the U.S. Right to Know campaign in a page describing the ACSH's sleazy practices.

See the Sourcewatch entry on the ACSH here. Ralph Nader once described the ACSH as "...a consumer front organization for
its business backers. It has seized the language and style of the existing consumer organizations, but its real purpose, you
might say, is to glove the hand that feeds it."

The ACSH is pro-DDT, pro Agent Orange and loves asbestos. It promotes some of the most outlandish and mind-boggling
quackery and junk science ever witnessed. From Sourcewatch.org:

"ACSH calls the U.S. ban on DDT one of the 20 worst unfounded health scares of the 20th century. It ridicules the
risks that chemical "endocrine disruptors" pose to human health and fertility. In addition to pesticides and chemical
food additives, it has defended asbestos, Agent Orange and nuclear power.

Whelan's nutritional advice has also raised eyebrows among health experts, many of whom take exception to her
claims that there is "no such thing as 'junk food,' " and that "There is insufficient evidence of a relationship between
diet and any disease."

The ACSH also solicited money from Big Tobacco to fund what it called opposition to the "pseudoscience" and
"misinformation" in the media's claims that smoking cigarettes was bad for your health. As Sourcewatch.org explains:

"In December, 1980 ACSH co-founder Stare wrote to tobacco giant Philip Morris seeking financial support. "We are
a voice of scientific reason in a sea of pseudo science, exaggeration and misinformation. We believe it would be to
your benefit to help ACSH," he wrote. Stare explained that the "basic" ACSH corporate benefactor membership was
$3,000 "but we hope you will contribute $10,000 or more."

Read the full story at: NaturalNews.

Unbiased: Help Support A Writer As He Exposes The Truth About Wikipedia's

Censorship Of Alternative Medicine
April 11 2015| From: NaturalNews

Arriving at a "neutral point of view" is what the editors and top dogs at the free online "fauxpedia"
website Wikipedia claim they one day hope to achieve.
But the popular information website's extensive track record of ignoring, denying and even blatantly lying about the
scientific merits of natural and "alternative" medicine proves, quite obviously, that Wikipedia's stated editorial policy
is nothing but empty rhetoric posing as sound intention.

And sadly, many people still don't realize the true nature of Wikipedia's endless assault on natural health, which is the subject
of a new book project by published author, columnist and podcast host Mike Bundrant. Burdened by the fact that the web's
sixth most popular site continues to deceive the public about the science behind alternative medicine, the dangers of
genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the healing power of naturopathy and more, Bundrant has set out to right the wrongs
of this highly misleading web resource.

But he needs your help. Taking on the fat cats isn't easy, and like every other major endeavor in today's world it requires
substantial financial backing. In order to write and publish what will become one of the most comprehensive, science-based
exposes on Wikipedia's active censorship of everything with which it disagrees, Bundrant is hoping to raise $67,100 by May 6,
2015. You can help make this important work a reality by clicking here and contributing to KickStarter.

"Wikipedia is on a misinformation campaign against alternative health and the healing arts," says Bundrant.

"The public needs to know it. Natural health deserves fair representation. We're going to set the record straight. We
need your help and invite you to get involved in the process."

As a matter of policy, Wikipedia actively denies the existence of science with which it disagrees

Wikipedia's entry for "Alternative Medicine," for instance, claims as fact that anything associated with alternative medicine is
essentially quackery. This same entry, which millions of people will likely visit with the belief that it contains undeniable truth,
openly admits that Wikipedia promotes conventional medicine, declaring anything alternative to not have any basis
whatsoever in the scientific method.

The Wikipedia page for "Genetically modified food controversies" is similarly duplicitous. According to the Wikipedia gods,
GMO food is completely safe and no different from "conventional food" in terms of its safety risk to humans. Wikipedia also
contends that "no reports of ill effects have been documented in the human population from genetically modified food."

This last statement is patently false -- there's plenty of published research suggesting human health effects associated with
GMO consumption. Even the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) agrees, noting that "serious health risks"
are associated with GMO food, including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, faulty insulin regulation, and changes
to major organs and the gastrointestinal system.

"The only published human feeding experiment revealed that the genetic material inserted into GM soy transfers
into bacteria living inside our intestines and continues to function," explains the Institute for Responsible
Technology (IRT). "This means that long after we stop eating GM foods, we may still have their GM proteins
produced continuously inside us."

Help support Unbiased and expose Wikipedia's stranglehold on the free flow of information

Clearly, Wikipedia has chosen to ignore this disturbing fact and a whole cohort of other scientific evidence suggesting harm
from GMOs. But this is the problem with Wikipedia -- the site censors, removes or denies the existence of scientific evidence
that contradicts the status quo. And this is the reason why Bundrant is writing his book.

"This book will be rigorously researched, written and prepared for publication over the course of nine months," says
Bundrant. "Information will be obtained through academic inquiry into peer-reviewed scientific
literature. Unbiased will be independently published and promoted widely, with significant help from leaders in
natural health."

To learn more and to help support the project, visit: KickStarter.com.

Senior Academic Condemns Deluded Supporters Of GM Food As Being Anti-

Science And Ignoring Evidence Of Dangers
March 31 2015 | From: TheDailyMail

Dr Jane Goodall argues supporters of GM food ignored evidence of harm

Endorsed US book which says GM producers have twisted evidence
Publication comes as backlash against GM food is growing in US
Primate expert warns Britain and Europe not to drop GM safeguards
Accuses supporters of 'fraud' and says they are 'anti science'
Click on the image above to view a larger version in another window

Dame Jane Goodall, the renowned primate expert, has condemned deluded politicians for pushing Frankenstein
Food. The highly respected academic has endorsed a new book, which argues the companies responsible for
developing genetically modified farming and food have twisted the evidence to minimise the dangers.

Historically, critics of GM food have been lambasted by the GM companies, scientists who rely on their funding, and
politicians, including the UK Government, as being anti-science.

However, Dame Jane argues that the advocates of GM food have ignored evidence of harm with the result it is they who are
guilty of being anti-science. The intervention is a powerful condemnation of the way biotech companies like Monsanto,
Syngenta and Bayer, have forced GM crops and food on to dinner plates in the US without proper safety tests.

And she is joining a growing campaign warning that Britain and Europe must not drop safeguards that have kept GM crops
out.

Dame Janes concerns have been raised in the foreword to a new book, Altered Genes, Twisted Truth, which is written by
the American public interest lawyer, Steve Druker.

Its publication comes as the US is seeing a growing backlash against GM. Just last week it emerged that the countrys
favourite chocolate manufacturer, Hershey, is to drop GM from its products. Dame Jane said she has become appalled as
what she calls a shocking corruption of the life forms of the planet.

She said the GM process, which involves adding foreign genes to plants to create toxins to fend off insects or give them
immunity to being sprayed with chemical pesticides has fundamentally changed them.

However, she complains that supporters of the technology have committed a fraud by trying to give the false impression
that these new plants are essentially the same as those created by conventional plant breeding.
She said:

This very real difference between GM plants and their conventional counterparts is one of the basic truths that
biotech proponents have endeavoured to obscure. As part of the process, they portrayed the various concerns as
merely the ignorant opinions of misinformed individuals and derided them as not only unscientific, but anti-
science.

They then set to work to convince the public and government officials, through the dissemination of false
information, that there was an overwhelming expert consensus, based on solid evidence, that the new foods were
safe. Yet this, as Druker points out, was clearly not true.

Importantly, she claims, the companies have spread disinformation to try and win public support.

Druker describes how amazingly successful the biotech lobby has been and the extent to which the general
public and government decision makers have been hoodwinked by the clever and methodical twisting of the facts
and the propagation of many myths. Moreover, it appears that a number of respected scientific institutions, as well
as many eminent scientists, were complicit in this relentless spreading of disinformation.

Dame Jane is considered to be the worlds foremost expert on chimpanzees. She is best known for her 55-year study of
social and family interactions of wild chimpanzees in Gombe Stream National Park, Tanzania.

She was made a Dame in 2004 and holds many other awards for her environmental and humanitarian work, including the
Benjamin Franklin Medal in Life Science, the French Legion of Honour, the Benjamin Franklin Medal in Life Science, Japan
s Kyoto Prize and the Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement.

The British government has signalled that it plans to use a new GM crop approval process to push ahead with
growing the crops in this country. Separately, a new trade agreement between the EU and the USA, which is called
TTIP, could make it much easier for GM foods from North America to appear on shelves here.

However, Dame Jane warns it would be an enormous risk to accept the technology and describes Mr Druker as a hero
worthy of a Nobel prize for lifting the lid on the truth about GM.

She describes his work as one of the most important books of the last 50 years, and adds: It will go a long way toward
dispelling the confusion and delusion that has been created regarding the genetic engineering process and the foods it
creates.

Although this book tells a story thats in many ways distressing, its important that it has finally been told because
so much confusion has been spread and so many important decision-makers have apparently been deluded.

Mr Druker, who gave a press conference in London yesterday(wed), has challenged Britains Royal Society to apologies for
its pro-GM stance and its part in rubbishing scientists who have safety doubts over the crops and food.

His work points to research which has found tumours, liver and kidney harm in animals given GM feed in trials. And he
complains, that researchers who dare to raise these problems have been pilloried.

He said:
 Contrary to the assertions of its proponents, the massive enterprise to reconfigure the genetic core of the worlds
food supply is not based on sound science but on the systematic subversion of science and it would collapse if
subjected to an open airing of the facts.

Pat Thomas, director of the campaigning group Beyond GM, warned the TTIP trade talks mean Britain and Europe could see
a flood of biotech crops and food arriving here.

She said:

'Steven Drukers investigation into the history of fraud and deceit that ushered in the era of GM deserves serious
consideration before we take actions that will irreversibly alter the European food supply.

Dr Julian Little a spokesman for Bayer CropScience was not aware of Drunker's book.

He said:

'We are now up to the three trillion meals and counting, that is meals containing GM ingredients, without a single
substantial health issue since the beginning of the technology.

'There has been much dirt thrown but none of it has stuck.'

On its website Monsanto say they place the 'highest priority' on the safety of their products and conduct 'rigorous and
comprehensive testing on each.'

They state: 'In fact, seeds with GM traits have been tested more than any other crops in the history of agriculture with no
evidence of harm to humans or animals.

'In addition, governmental regulatory agencies, scientific organizations and leading health associations worldwide
agree on the safety of GM crops.'

A spokesman for the company added: 'The denial of the safety of GM seeds and food ingredients is as baseless as the
denial of clearly documented climate change.

'Countless peer-reviewed scientific studies performed with biotech crops including more than 100 feeding studies
have confirmed their safety, as reflected in the respective safety assessments by regulatory authorities around
the world.'

Comment: One would expect that a publication such as the Daily Mail would seek to provide a 'balanced argument'
but for those with eyes to see it is abundantly clear that GMO is driven by an agenda that is astoundingly dark and
evil.
The Doctor Who Beat The British General Medical Council By Proving That Vaccines
Arent Necessary To Achieve Health + Attacking Ourselves: Top Doctors Reveal
Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against Us
March 26 2015 | From: Collective-Evolution / GreenMedInfo / HealthyWildAndFree

Related: How To Rebuild Your Immune System in 3 Days

The Doctor Who Beat The British General Medical Council By Proving That Vaccines Arent
Necessary To Achieve Health

What happened when a UK doctor appeared as an expert witness to help two mothers prove in court that their
children didnt need to be vaccinated?

Related: 8 More Reasons I Havent Vaccinated My Daughter

A 3 year court case against the British General Medical Council that ended with the doctor accused having all allegations
dropped.

Dr. Jayne Donegan, a UK GP, has lived a most fascinating story. It began with her originally being a very strong advocate for
vaccinations, but fast forward quite a few years later, and she now not only speaks out against the dangers of vaccinations,
but ended up being taken to the General Medical Council with some pretty serious claims by them regarding her
professionalism.

After a few stressful years in court against them, Dr. Donegan won her case. But chances are, this is the first youre hearing
of it.
In order for you to get the full account of what happened, its best to read her full story. Dr. Donegan gave me her permission
to use her account below:

Dr. Jayne Donegans Story

Having trained as a conventional medical doctor, qualifying from St. Marys Hospital Medical School, University of London, in
1983, all of my undergraduate teaching and postgraduate experience in Obstetrics & Gynecology, Family Planning, Child
Health, Orthopedics, Emergency Medicine and General Practice led me to be a strong supporter of the Universal Childhood
Vaccination Program.

Indeed, I used to counsel parents in the 1980s who didnt want to vaccinate their children against whooping cough which
was regarded as the problematic vaccine in those days.

I used to tell them that there were, indeed, adverse reactions, associated with the vaccine I was not one of those doctors
who would gloss over such unpleasant details but that we doctors were told that the adverse reactions that might occur
after the pertussis vaccine were at least ten times less likely than the chance of getting complications from having the
disease, and that, essentially, the point of giving their child the vaccine was to prevent them from getting the disease.

I Used To Think Parents Who Dont Vaccinate Were Either Ignorant or Sociopathic

Indeed, I used to think that parents who didnt want to vaccinate their children were either ignorant, or sociopathic. I believe
that view is not uncommon among doctors today. Why did I have this attitude?

Well, throughout my medical training I was taught that the people who used to die in their thousands or hundreds of
thousands from diseases like diphtheria, whooping cough and measles diseases for which there are vaccines stopped
dying because of the introduction of vaccines.

At the same time, I was taught that diseases like typhus, cholera, rheumatic and scarlet fever for which there are no
vaccines stopped killing people because of improvements in social conditions.

It would have been a logical progression to have asked myself why, if social conditions improved the health of the population
with respect to some diseases, would they not improve their health with regard to them all, but the amount of information that
you are required to absorb during medical training is so huge that you just tend to take it as read and not make the
connections that might be obvious to someone else.

It was a received article of faith for me and my contemporaries that vaccination was the single most useful health
intervention that had ever been introduced, and when my children were born in 1991 and 1993 I unquestioningly well, that
is to say, I thought it was with full knowledge backed up by all my medical training had them vaccinated, up as far as MMR,
because that was the right thing to do. I even let my 4-week-old daughter be injected with an out-of-date BGC vaccine at a
public health clinic.

Out Of Date BCG Vaccine Injured My Child

I noticed (force of habit I automatically scan vials for drug name, batch number and expiry date) that the vaccine was out of
date and said, Oh, excuse me, it looks like its out of date, and the doctor answered matter-of-factly, Oh dont worry, thats
why the clinic was delayed for an hour we were just checking that it was OK to give it, and it is, and I said, OK, and let
her inject it my poor daughter had a terrible reaction, but I was so convinced that it was all for the best that I carried on with
all the rest of them at 2, 3 and 4 months.

No Evidence Of Measles Epidemic

That is where I was coming from even my interest in homeopathy didnt dent my enthusiasm for vaccines; so far as I could
see, it was the same process give a small dose of something and it makes you immune no conflict.

So what happened? In 1994 there was the Measles Rubella Campaign in which 7 million schoolchildren were vaccinated
against measles and rubella. The Chief Medical Officer sent out letters to all GPs, pharmacists, nursing officers and other
healthcare staff, telling us that there was going to be an epidemic of measles.

The evidence for this epidemic was not published at the time. In later years it seems that it was predicted by a complicated
mathematical model based on estimates and so might never have been going to occur at all.

We were told:
 Everybody who has had one dose of the vaccine will not necessarily be protected when the epidemic comes. So
they need another one. Well, thats OK, I thought, because we know that none of the vaccines are 100 percent
effective.

Alarm Bells: Now Three MMRs Were Needed?

What did worry me, however, was when they said that even those who had had two doses of measles vaccine would not
necessarily be protected when the epidemic came and that they needed a third. You may not remember, but in those days
there was only one measles vaccine in the schedule.

It was a live virus vaccine, so it was like coming in contact with the wild virus, just changed slightly to make it safer and
leading to immunity. Since then, of course, the pre-school dose has been added because one dose didnt work, but in those
days there was just one shot for life.

And now we were being told that even two shots of a one shot vaccine would not protect people when the epidemic came.

At this point I began to ask myself,

Why have I been telling all these parents that vaccines are safer than getting the disease and that basically, having
the vaccine will stop their children getting the disease with the risk of complications its not 100 percent, but
thats basically what theyre designed to do when it seems that they can be vaccinated, have whatever adverse
reactions are associated with the vaccine, and still get the disease with whatever complications may be associated
 with that, even when theyve had two doses of the one shot vaccine? So what was the point? This doesnt seem
right.

If you are wondering how come anyone would have had two doses of the one shot vaccine, it is because when the MMR
was introduced in 1988, many children had already been vaccinated against measles, but we were told that we should give
them the MMR anyway as it would protect them against mumps and rubella and boost their measles immunity.

We were also told that the best way of vaccinating was en masse, because this would break the chain of transmission. So I
thought, I wonder why we vaccinate all these small babies at 2, 3 and 4 months? Why dont we just wait two or three years
and then vaccinate everyone who has been born in the meantime, and break the chain of transmission.

Things Just Didnt Add Up

So some things just didnt seem to quite add up. However, it is very hard to start seriously questioning whether or not
vaccination is anything other than safe and effective, especially when it is something that you have been taught to believe in
so strongly.

The more medically qualified you are, the more difficult it is, as in some ways the more brainwashed you are. Its not easy, or
at least it wasnt then, to start going down a path that might lead you in the opposite direction to all your colleagues and the
healthcare system in which you work. I read some books that could be described as anti-vaccination.

They contained graphs showing that the majority of the decrease in deaths from and incidence of the infectious diseases for
which we have vaccines occurred before the vaccines were introduced in the 1950s and 60s, for example with whooping
cough, and in the late 1960s with measles.

I decided that I couldnt just accept what these books were telling me, especially as the message was the opposite to what I
had learned up until now. I needed to do some research. The graphs in my textbooks and the Department of Health
Immunization Handbook (the Green Book) appeared to show that the introduction of vaccines caused precipitous falls in
deaths from vaccinatable diseases.

Collating My Own Vaccine Charts Why Was It so Hard To Obtain The Information?

I decided that if I were going to seriously question what Id been taught at medical school and by my professors, I would have
go and get the real data for myself. Accordingly, I called the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and asked them to send me
the graphs of deaths from the diseases against which we vaccinate from the middle of the nineteenth century, when we
started keeping records, until now.

They said, We dont have them except for smallpox and TB; we suggest you try the Department of Health. Which I did.

They didnt have graphs from the nineteenth or early twentieth century either. They said, Youd better try the Office for
National Statistics. Ive already tried them, I said. They were the ones who advised me to contact you.

It seems to be getting rather circular, so I called up the ONS once again and told them my problem. Well, they said, we
have all the books here from when the Registrar General started taking returns of deaths from infectious diseases in 1837;
you can come along and look at them if you like. There was nothing for it.

I had to go the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in Pimlico, London, with my two young children aged 6 and 4 in tow, to
extract the information myself. The girls were very good they were used to traveling/following me around and the library
staff were very nice; they kindly gave my daughters orange juice to drink, and paper and crayons to draw with and amuse
themselves, while I pulled out all the mothy old books from 1837 until 1900, after which, thankfully, there was a CD ROM that
could be bought at vast expense and taken home.

It was the most user-unfriendly piece of data storage that I have ever come across, but it was better than having to physically
be there day after day. So I went home with all my notes and the CD Rom and eventually produced my own graphs. I was
startled to find that they were similar to the graphs in some of the books that I had recently read.

People Stopped Dying of Whooping Cough Long Before Vaccine Was Introduced

I was astonished and not a little perturbed to find that when you draw a graph of the death rate from whooping cough that
starts in the mid nineteenth century, you can clearly see that at least 99 percent of the people who used to die of whooping
cough in the nineteenth and early twentieth century had stopped dying before the vaccine against whooping cough was
introduced, initially in the 1950s and universally in the 1960s.

I also realized that the reason the Department of Healths graphs made the vaccine appear so effective was because they
didnt start until the 1940s when most of the improvements in health had already occurred, and this was before even
antibiotics were generally available.

If you selected only deaths in under-15-year-olds, the drop was even more dramatic by the time whooping cough vaccine
was part of the universal immunization schedule in the early 1960s all the hard work had been done.

Department of Healths Own Charts: Not A Good Way Of Showing Changes in Mortality and
Disease

I now began to realize that graphs such as those featured in the Department of Health Green Book were not a good or clear
way of showing the changes in mortality (death) and morbidity (incidence of disease) that occurred before and after
vaccination was introduced against these diseases.

Measles is similar: the Department of Health Green Book features a graph that does not start until the 1940s. There appears
to be great drop in the number of cases after the measles vaccine was introduced in 1968, but looking at a graph which goes
back to the 1900s you can see that the death rate death being the worst-case complication of a disease had dropped by
99 percent by the time the vaccine was put on the schedule.

100% Decline In Measles Deaths Three Years Before Vaccine Was Introduced

Looking specifically at under-15-year-olds, it is possible to see that there was a virtual 100 percent decline in deaths from
measles between 1905 and 1965 three years before the measles vaccine was introduced in the UK. In the late 1990s
there was an advertisement for MMR which featured a baby in nappies sitting on the edge of a cliff with a lion prowling on
the other side and a voice-over saying, No loving parent would deliberately leave their baby unprotected and in danger.
I think it would have been more scientific to have put one of the graphs using information from the ONS in the advert then
parents would have had a greater chance of making an informed choice, rather than being coerced by fear. When you visit
your GP or Health Visitor to discuss the vaccination issue, and you come away feeling scared, this is because you are
picking up how they feel.

If all you have is the medical model for disease and health, all you know is that there is a hostile world out there and if you
dont have vaccines, antibiotics and 100 percent bactericidal hand-wash, you will have no defense at all against all those
germs with which you and your children are surrounded.

Your child may be OK when they get the measles, but you can never tell when disaster will strike, and they may be left
disabled or dead by the random hand of fate.

Health Is the Only Immunity

Related: How To Restore Your Health: Your Body Can Self-Repair

I was like that myself, and when the awful realization began to dawn on me that vaccines werent all they were cracked up to
be, I started looking in a panic for some other way of protecting my children and myself some other magic bullet.

My long, slow journey researching the vaccination disease ecology involved learning about other models and philosophies of
health and the gradual realization that it was true what people had told me all along, that health is the only immunity.

We dont need to be protected from out there. We get infectious diseases when our body needs to have a periodic clean-
out. Children especially benefit from childhood spotty rashes, or ex anthems as they are called, in order to make
appropriate developmental leaps. When we have fevers, coughs, rashes, we need to treat them supportively, not
suppressively.

Standard Medical Treatment Suppresses Symptoms And Causes The Most Harm

In my experience, the worst complications of childhood infections are caused by standard medical treatment which
involves suppressing all the symptoms. What is the biggest obstacle to doctors even entertaining the possibility that the
Universal Childhood Vaccination Program may not be the unmitigated success that it is portrayed to be?

Or that there may be other ways of achieving health that are better and longer lasting? Possibly it is the fear of stepping out
of line and being seen to be different with all the consequences that this can entail, as I know from personal experience.

As George Bernard Shaw says in his preface to The Doctors Dilemma, 1906 :

Doctors are just like other Englishmen: most of them have no honor and no conscience: what they commonly
mistake for these is sentimentality and an intense dread of doing anything that everybody else does not do, or
omitting to do anything that everybody else does.

The British General Medical Council Court Case

Here is some very interesting information regarding Dr. Donegan, and why her authority on vaccines should be paid attention
to, simply because the medical world actually did. In 2002 Dr. Donegan went to the High Court, as she was involved in a
case where two mothers were fighting their ex-partners about their childrens vaccinations.

The mothers did not want them to be given to their children under any circumstances for fear of causing irreversible
harm, but the fathers did, so a controversial court case ensued.

Dr. Donegan had been writing and speaking publicly about vaccinations and natural ways of keeping children healthy so she
was asked to be an expert witness by the two mothers. Dr. Donegan gave her professional opinion that the safety and
efficacy of vaccines has not been well studied and that there were other ways of achieving health than vaccination for these
children.
The case proved very long and extremely stressful. At times it was under very unfair circumstances where she would be
given hardly any time to get documents together, despite the opposition having double the time to prepare theirs.

Read the full story at: CollectiveEvolution

Attacking Ourselves: Top Doctors Reveal Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against
Us
The research is hard to ignore, vaccines can trigger autoimmunity with a laundry list of diseases to
follow. With harmful and toxic metals as some vaccine ingredients, who is susceptible and which
individuals are more at risk?
No one would accuse Yehuda Shoenfeld of being a quack. The Israeli clinician has spent more than three decades
studying the human immune system and is at the pinnacle of his profession.

You might say he is more foundation than fringe in his specialty; he wrote the textbooks. The Mosaic of
Autoimmunity, Autoantibodies, Diagnostic Criteria in Autoimmune Diseases, Infection and Autoimmunity, Cancer and
Autoimmunity the list is 25 titles long and some of them are cornerstones of clinical practice.

Hardly surprising that Shoenfeld has been called the "Godfather of Autoimmunology" the study of the immune system
turned on itself in a wide array of diseases from type 1 diabetes to ulcerative colitis and multiple sclerosis.

But something strange is happening in the world of immunology lately and a small evidence of it is that the Godfather of
Autoimmunology is pointing to vaccines specifically, some of their ingredients including the toxic metal aluminum as a
significant contributor to the growing global epidemic of autoimmune diseases.

The bigger evidence is a huge body of research that's poured in in the past 15 years, and particularly in the past five years.
Take for example, a recent article published in the journal Pharmacological Research in which Shoenfeld and colleagues
issue unprecedented guidelines naming four categories of people who are most at risk for vaccine-induced autoimmunity.

"On one hand," vaccines prevent infections which can trigger autoimmunity, say the paper's authors, Alessandra Soriano, of
the Department of Clinical Medicine and Rheumatology at the Campus Bio-Medico University in Rome, Gideon Nesher, of
the Hebrew University Medical School in Jerusalem and Shoenfeld, founder and head of the Zabludowicz Center of
Autoimmune Diseases in the Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer.

He is also editor of three medical journals and author of more than 1,500 research papers across the spectrum of medical
journalism and founder of the International Congress on Autoimmunology.

On the other hand, many reports that describe post-vaccination autoimmunity strongly suggest that vaccines can
indeed trigger autoimmunity.

Defined autoimmune diseases that may occur following vaccinations include arthritis, lupus (systemic lupus
erythematosus, SLE) diabetes mellitus, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, dermatomyosiositis, Guillain-Barre syndrome
and demyelinating disorders. Almost all types of vaccines have been reported to be associated with the onset of
ASIA."

ASIA or Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (also known as Shoenfeld's syndrome) -- first
appeared in the Journal of Autoimmunology four years ago. It is an umbrella term for a collection of similar symptoms,
including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, that result after exposure to an adjuvant an environmental agent including common
vaccine ingredients that stimulate the immune system.

Since then an enormous body of research, using ASIA as a paradigm, has begun to unravel the mystery of how
environmental toxins, particularly the metal aluminum used in vaccines, can trigger an immune system chain reaction in
susceptible individuals and may lead to overt autoimmune disease.
Autoimmune disease results when the body's system meant to attack foreign invaders turns instead to attack part of the
body it belongs to (auto is Greek for self). If the immune system is like a national defence system, antibodies are like drones
programmed to recognize a certain type of invader (a bacteria say) and to destroy them or mark them for destruction by
other special forces.

Autoantibodies are like drones that are misidentifying a component of the human body and have launched a sustained attack
on it. If they mistakenly target a component of the conductive sheath around neurons, for example, nerve impulses stop
conducting properly, muscles go into spasm and coordination fails; multiple sclerosis results. If autoantibodies erroneously
focus on joint tissue; rheumatoid arthritis results. If they target the islets of Langerhans in the pancreas, Type 1 diabetes, and
so on.

Throughout our lifetime the normal immune system walks a fine line between preserving normal immune reactions
and developing autoimmune diseases," says the paper. "The healthy immune system is tolerant to self-antigens.
When self-tolerance is disturbed, dysregulation of the immune system follows, resulting in emergence of an
autoimmune disease. Vaccination is one of the conditions that may disturb this homeostasis in susceptible
individuals, resulting in autoimmune phenomena and ASIA."

Who is "susceptible" is the subject of the paper entitled, "Predicting post-vaccination autoimmunity: Who might be at risk?"

It lists four categories of people:

1) Those who have had a previous autoimmune reaction to a vaccine

2) Anyone with a medical history of autoimmunity

3) Patients with a history of allergic reactions

4) Anyone at high risk of developing autoimmune disease including anyone with a family history of autoimmunity,
presence of autoantibodies which are detectable by blood tests and other factors including low vitamin D and smoking.

Previous Reaction
Regarding those who have had a previous adverse reaction to vaccines, the paper cites five relevant studies including the
case of a death of a teenage girl six months following her third Gardasil injection against HPV virus.

She had experienced a range of symptoms shortly after her first dose, including dizziness, numbness and tingling in her
hands, and memory lapses. After her second injection, she developed "intermittent arm weakness, frequent tiredness
requiring daytime naps," worse tingling, night sweats, chest pain and palpitations.

A full autopsy was unrevealing but blood and spleen tissue analysis revealed HPV-16 L1 gene DNA fragments matching
the DNA found in vials of the Gardasil vaccine against cervical cancer "thus implicating the vaccine as a causal factor."

The DNA fragments had also been found to be "complexed with the aluminum adjuvant" which, according to the report, have
been shown to persist for up to 8 to 10 years causing chronic immune system stimulation.

"Although data is limited," Shoenfeld and his colleagues concluded, "it seems preferable that individuals with prior
autoimmune or autoimmune-like reactions to vaccinations, should not be immunized, at least not with the same type of
vaccine."

Established Autoimmune Condition

The second group which the paper cites for vaccine exemption is patients with "established autoimmune conditions."
Vaccines don't work so well in them, say Shoenfeld and his colleagues, and they are at "risk for flares following vaccination."

Inoculations that contain live viruses including chickenpox, yellow fever and the measles, mumps and rubella triple vaccine
(MMR) are "generally contraindicated" for people with autoimmune conditions because of the risk of "uncontrolled viral
replication."

But inactivated vaccines are not such a good idea either because they usually contain the added ingredient aluminum, linked
to autoimmunity.

The immunologists describe recent studies in which patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease given the influenza vaccine
(without aluminum) suffered more joint pain and fever than controls and whose levels of autoantibodies (the drones that
attack self) increased after receiving the flu vaccine.

What's more, they developed new types of autoantibodies that weren't present before the vaccines, and those persisted. As
the presence of autoantibodies can be predictive of developing autoimmune disease in patients without symptoms, even
years ahead of disease onset, this is troubling to those who understand immunology.

A number of studies claim vaccines are safe for the "overwhelming majority of patients with established autoimmune
diseases," the study allows, but they only looked at rheumatoid arthritis and lupus and not at severe and active cases so "the
potential benefit of vaccination should be weighed against its potential risk," they cautioned.
Patients With a History Of Allergy

Vaccine trials have usually excluded "vulnerable" individuals -- only extremely healthy individuals with no allergies are
recruited. It's a "selection bias," say Soriano and Shoenfeld, and has likely resulted in serious adverse events being
"considerably underestimated" in "real life where vaccines are mandated to all individuals regardless of their susceptibility."

The true incidence of allergic reactions to vaccines, normally estimated at between one in 50,000 to one in a million doses, is
probably much higher and particularly where gelatin or egg proteins are on the ingredients list, they say.

There's a long list of vaccine ingredients that are potential allergens: besides the infectious agents themselves, there are
those from hen's egg, horse serum, baker's yeast, numerous antibiotics, formaldehyde and lactose, as well "inadvertent"
ingredients such as latex.

People's allergic histories have to be taken before vaccination say the researchers. But some signs of reaction don't show up
until after the shot.

The public health nurse or GP might tell patients that a long-lasting swelling around the injection site after a vaccine is a
normal reaction, for example. But that is not what the immunologists say.

"[A]luminum sensitization manifests as nodules [hard lumps] at the injection site that often regress after weeks or
months, but may persist for years."

In such cases, they say, a patch test can be done to confirm sensitivity and to avoid vaccination.

According to a growing body of research, though, allergy may be only the beginning of many dangerous aluminum-induced
phenomena.

The Trouble With Aluminium

Aluminum has been added to vaccines since about 1926 when Alexander Glenny and colleagues noticed it would produce
better antibody responses in vaccines than the antigen alone. Glenny figured the alum was inducing what he called a "depot
effect" slowing the release of the antigen and heightening the immune response.

For 60 years his theory was accepted dogma. And over the same time, the vaccine schedule grew decade on decade, but
few ever questioned the effects of injecting aluminum into the body, which is strange considering its known toxicity.

A PubMed search on aluminum and "toxicity" turns up 4,258 entries. Its neurotoxicity is well documented. It affects memory,
cognition, psychomotor control; it damages the blood brain barrier, activates brain inflammation, depresses mitochondrial
function and plenty of research suggests it is a key player in the formation of the amyloid "plaques" and tangles in the brains
of Alzheimer's patients.

It's been implicated in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and autism and demonstrated to induce allergy.

When kidney dialysis patients were accidentally infused with aluminum, the "dialysis-induced
encephalopathy" (DAE) they developed neurological symptoms: speech abnormalities, tremors, memory loss, impaired
concentration and behavioural changes. Many of the patients eventually went into comas and died.

The lucky ones survived: when the source of toxicity, aluminum, was removed from their dialysis they recovered
rapidly.

With these new observations, researchers began investigating the adjuvant effects of aluminum and in the past decade there
has been a flurry of research. Far from being a sandbag that holds the antigen for a while and then gets excreted, it turns
out that aluminum salts trigger a storm of defence action.

Within hours of injection of the same aluminum oxyhydroxide in vaccines into mice, for example, armies of specialized
immune cells are on the move, calling in grid coordinates for more specialist assault forces.

Within a day, a whole host of immune system commandos are in play -- neutrophils, eosinophils, inflammatory monocytes,
myeloid and dendritic cells, activating lymphocytes and secreting proteins called cytokines.
The cytokines themselves cause collateral damage but they send out signals, directing cell-to-cell communication and
recruiting other cells into action. If the next phase of the attack is launched: fibroblast growth factor, interferons, interleukins,
platelet derived growth factor, transforming growth factor and tumour necrosis factor might all be engaged.

There's evidence that poorly understood and pesky inflammasomes, (currently a topic of cutting- edge cancer causation
research) such as the Nod-like receptor 3( NLRP) are activated too, but it's all still too early to say exactly what they're
doing.

Read the full story at: GreenMedInfo

GMO Science Deniers: Monsanto And The USDA

March 24 2015 | From: HuffingtonPost

Perhaps no group of science deniers has been more ridiculed than those who deny the science of
evolution. What you may not know is that Monsanto and our United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) are among them.
Related: Monsanto Demands WHO Retract Study Linking Product to Cancer

Related: 75% of Air and Rain Samples Contain Monsantos Round Up

That's right: for decades, Monsanto and its enablers inside the USDA have denied the central tenets of evolutionary
biology, namely natural selection and adaptation.

And this denial of basic science by the company and our government threatens the future viability of American agriculture.

Third Grade Science

As we all remember from biology class. Let's start with interrelated concepts of natural selection and adaptation. This is
elementary school science. In fact, in Washington D.C. it is part of the basic third grade science curriculum. , when an
environment changes, trait variation in a species could allow some in that species to adapt to that new environment and
survive. Others will die out.

The survivors are then able to reproduce and even thrive under the new environmental conditions. For example, if a drought
were to occur, some plants might have traits that allow them to survive while other plants in the same species would perish.
The drought-resistant plants then become the "evolved" species, and they are able to reproduce in the drought environment.

Obvious, you are thinking. But let's explore how Monsanto's top scientists and government regulators would have failed a
third grade science class in D.C. and the dire consequences that it is bringing to us all.

Biotech's Dirty Little Secret

First a little background. Since the early 1980s, Monsanto has endlessly hyped genetically engineered (GE) crops they claim
could reduce hunger, reduce pesticide use, and survive droughts. In reality, no such "miracle" crops exist.

No significantly greater yielding crops, no more effective drought resistance crops. And as for the claim of less pesticide
use, behind this myth lies the "dirty little secret" of agricultural biotechnology. Namely, that GE crops actually add hundreds
of millions of pounds of pesticides to our fields and crops, and create greater agrochemical residues on our food.

Why? Because around 85 percent of all genetically engineered crops in the United States and around the world have been
engineered to withstand massive doses of herbicides, mostly Monsanto's Roundup.

Usually, if toxic weed-killing chemicals such as Roundup come into contact with a crop they will destroy it as well as the
weeds around it. But Monsanto scientists genetically engineered a cassette of bacterial and viral DNA into plants that
allowed them to tolerate these herbicides. So the weeds are killed, but the crops remain.

In the United States, more than 50 percent of all cropland is devoted to GE corn, soy and cotton. They are commodity crops
that feed cars, animals in industrial meat production and are used for additives like high fructose corn syrup.

Almost none directly feeds people. So rather than feeding the hungry, this technology is about chemical companies selling
more chemicals, a lot more chemicals. So as noted, each year 115 million more pounds of Roundup are spread on our
farmlands because of these altered crops.
Profits versus Science: Science loses

If half of our nation's cropland is doused year after year with a particular herbicide, that is a significant change in the
environment. The accompanying problem of adaptation and selection has probably already occurred to you.

Wouldn't that massive increase in Roundup use over that huge a portion of our cropland cause some weed populations to
develop resistance? Wouldn't weeds with natural resistance thrive in this new environment? Wouldn't these new
"superweeds" eventually become a major problem for U.S. farmers, overrunning their crops?

As government regulators were considering whether to approve these plants in the mid-1990s, they asked Monsanto just
that question. No doubt considering the billions they were going to make selling more Roundup, this is a moment when
Monsanto's scientists seemed to find it convenient to their bottom line to deny basic evolutionary science. They stated:

"Evolution of weed resistance to glyphosate (Roundup's active ingredient) appears to be an unlikely event."

They also suggested that massive use of Roundup would lead to "no resistant weeds."

Independent scientists were aghast. They mocked Monsanto's view that Roundup was somehow "invincible" from the laws
of natural selection, and pointed out that the company's scientists purposely ignored numerous studies that showed there
would be weed resistance. But incredibly, despite the strong contrary evidence, the USDA regulators just nodded in science
denying agreement with Monsanto.

Of course, adaptation and natural selection did take place. As a result, in less than 20 years, more than half of all U.S. farms
have some Roundup resistant "superweeds," weeds that now infest 70 million acres of U.S farmland, an area the size of
Wyoming.

Each year we see major expansion of this "superweed" acreage. Texas has gone so far as to declare a state of emergency
for cotton farmers. Superweeds are already causing major economic problems for farmers with a current estimate of $1
billion lost in damages to crops so far.

Last year in a panel discussion with Robert Fraley, Chief Technology Officer for Monsanto and a founder of these herbicide
tolerant crops, I confronted him. How could he and the other Monsanto scientists have claimed that natural selection would
not take place? How could they ignore basic evolutionary science and clear contrary evidence?

He just shook his head and said:

"You're right, weeds have evolved resistance."

But apparently, Monsanto and their government regulators still haven't learned this third grade science lesson. They're
denying science once again, and the stakes are even higher.

"Agent Orange Crops" and More Science Denial

Now Monsanto and Dow Chemical have received government approval to market new genetically engineered corn, soy and
cotton, that are "stacked" with engineered DNA that make them resistant to Roundup as well as 2,4-D (one of the chief
elements of "Agent Orange").

Monsanto has also gained approval from the USDA for the same three crops that can tolerate Dicamba. 2,4-D and Dicamba
are older, more toxic herbicides than Roundup, and these companies are reverting to them because they have brought us to
the point of peak herbicides. They simply don't have any new ones, similar to the current crisis in antibiotics.

But won't the weeds simply become resistant to these herbicides as well? Not according to the science deniers at Monsanto
and Dow Chemical. Despite predictions that their new crops will add hundreds of millions more pounds of these herbicides
each year, they say not to worry.
They claim -- as they did 20 years ago -- that natural selection will not happen; that it is extremely unlikely for weeds to
survive simultaneous attacks from two or more different herbicides with different methods.

Weed scientists have shredded this argument, noting that weeds in the past, through adaption, have done this and will
almost certainly do it again. So in a few years we will be overrun with "superweeds" that are virtually indestructible by any
known chemical.

But by then Monsanto and Dow will have made billions selling their chemicals and can leave the "superweed" agronomic
nightmare for others to solve. Nor will they have to deal with the other nightmares that could possibly occur: increased rates
of cancer and diseases like Parkinson's associated with exposure to these herbicides.

A Better Way

A science-based, and safer, way forward is to abandon this doomed-to-fail chemical arms race against weeds and use
ecologically based weed control.

There are proven organic and agroecological approaches that emphasize weed management rather than weed
eradication, soil building rather than soil supplementing. Crop rotation and cover crops can return productive yields without
ridding the land of genetic biodiversity, and could reduce herbicide use by 90 percent.

So it's long past due that our government required real and rigorous science when regulating GE crops. It's time for them to
say "no" to these herbicide-promoting crops, and prevent the looming agronomic disaster they will inevitably bring with them.

In the meantime, the next time you read hear about "GMO science deniers" - think of 70 million acres of
superweeds; think cancer, Parkinsons and other diseases caused by this growing use of herbicides; think
Monsanto and its enablers at the USDA.

How Monsanto Is Destroying The Brains And Health Of Everyone

March 10 2015 | From: WakingTimes

One of my most recent blog entries (1) summarized roughly 10 years of research related to the
consequences of inflammatory processes in the periphery of the body, such as the gut, and how this
was driving brain degenerative inflammatory processes within the brain.
One of the key findings from that research was how pathogenic bacterial waste products known as
lipopolysaccharides , (LPS) would trigger an immune response, and this immune response would then trigger the
brains immune cells, the microglia, to become overly active and degrade brain cells.

(LPS is basically small parts of the cell wall of the bad bacteria.) This response is called microglial activation.

Youll be hearing a lot more about it over the next 10 -20 years, because stopping this overactivation is central to correcting all
degenerative neurological conditions, including Alzheimers, Autism, Anxiety, ALS, Insomnia, non-situational Depression, MS,
and many endocrine system disorders including the unbiquitous adrenal and thyroid disorders that so many people are
struggling with right now.

In short, the process can work like this (note there are other ways to trigger this):

1) Pathogenic bacteria overgrow in intestines and create waste products (LPS) which activate the immune system to
respond and produce a chemical called Interleukin 1b.

2) The activity of this immune response is communicated to the brain by way of the vagus nerve which connects the brain
with our second brain, which is also called the gut.

3) The brains immune system cells called microglia become overly excited by the ongoing response to the toxins being
produced in the gut (or elsewhere in the body), and these microglia break down neurons.

So how does Monsanto contribute to this?

Monsanto is a chief producer of genetically modified products. Among the most dangerous products that they produce is the
herbicide RoundUp. RoundUp is a chemical called glyphosate that is combined with a few other chemicals.

Conventional farming of corn, soy, cotton, canola, and wheat is increasingly using more and more RoundUp on their
genetically modified crops as nature adapts to the toxicity of the RoundUp by becoming increasingly tolerant to it.

Ultimately nature will win out, but in the process our food, water, and soil will become increasingly poisoned by the compound
until those using these insane farming practices either recognize the foolishness of their ways, or they opt for something even
more toxic such as Agent Orange on the crops.(2)

The proponents of Monsantos version of GMO farming like to argue that glyphosate is fine to use since the enzymes that kill
the weeds which are affected by the RoundUp dont exist in the human body, therefore they cant hurt humans(3).

Where their argument falls apart is that the enzymes do exist in the microbes which make up our gut, and the importance of a
healthy gut ecology is central to good health. In other words, RoundUp residue is disrupting our microbiome, and this
disruption of our microbiome can result in an overgrowth of pathogenic bacteria relative to our beneficial bacteria (4).

Among those toxic bacteria which are known to become dominant is Clostridium Botulinum, which produces one of the most
potent bacterial toxins known to man. (4.5)The dominance of these pathogenic bacteria is amplified with the consumption of
sugar and high fructose syrup so dominant in the Standard American Diet (SAD), as these harmful microbes love to eat the
sweets so many Amercians put into their bodies.

Likewise, the artificial sweeteners either disrupt our gut flora (5) or they fuel the inflammatory processes within the brain
directly.(6) Also noteworthy, is the research which shows how the microbes in our gut will highly influence our bodies
cravings. In other words, much of your cravings for junk food and sweets may be coming from an unhealthy gut
microbiome.(6.5)

Recent research involving the parasite associated with Toxoplasmosis has shown that the parasite will affect behavior beyond
just food cravings, too.(6.6) The following video is a nice overview of how our microbiome affects our health.

So what does this all mean?

If our food contains residue of RoundUp, which it almost certainly will if youre eating conventionally raised corn, wheat, soy, or
canola, you can expect the microbial balance within your intestines to become prone to being shifted in the direction of being
dominant with pathogenic bacteria.

If the pathogenic bacteria becomes dominant, you can expect these bacteria to be producing lipopolysaccharides, which will
then trigger the immune system to produce the pro-inflammatory cycle I detailed above.

Given that scenario, if Monsantos crops, which dominate the food landscape right now, are altering our gut ecology and
causing it to become dominant in LPS generating bad bacteria, and this then initiates a brain degenerating pro-inflammatory
process in the brain, then we can conclude that Monsanto and conventional farming practices are key factors involving
probably every form of chronic illness.

Not only that, the pet food youre feeding your animals most likely is tainted with RoundUp residue. Like to eat out? Unless
theyre advertising their food as being all organic, expect to be consuming some RoundUp residue. Even if the food is
advertised as organic, research is showing that even this is no guarantee that genetically modified food isnt being used. (7)

So how do we stop this madness?

Unfortunately, there is a fascistic relationship between the government and Monsanto. Our current Food Safety Czar at the
FDA is former VP from Monsanto, Michael Taylor.

Additionally, Clarence Thomas, who sits on the Supreme Court, has never recused himself of any Supreme Court case related
to Monsanto, despite a clear conflict of interest given the fact that Clarence Thomas is a former lawyer for
Monsanto.(8) Government is now acting to make sure that the Monsanto machine isnt stopped.

This is going to require a grass roots campaign that starts with YOU! Now that you have this information, please share it with
others. Beyond that, Origins is an excellent documentary which covers many of the problems with our health and how it
relates to conventional farming practices like I described above.

If youre interested in learning more about what Ive detailed here, watch this video with your friends and family, and help make
it viral! The mainstream media isnt going to do this. Like it or not, stopping the Monsanto machine requires our collective
action.
Healing From Vaccine Injuries Through Homeopathy
March 11 2015 | From: GreenMedInfo

While there is much information in terms of the dangers of vaccines, there exists precious little
information in terms of how we may be healed of their side effects. Too many give up hope because
all they know is the allopathic system; which denies their injuries, not realising that there is hope to
be administered by way of homeopathic treatments.

There are treatments that can heal vaccine damage, but few physicians in the conventional medical care system
know about them, since vaccine injuries are usually denied as the cause of any illness. Some parents with autistic
children report that homeopathy has completely reversed their children's autism and healed other serious health
conditions caused by vaccines. This article explains how homeopathic remedies can bring about healing for many
types of vaccine injuries.

Homeopathy is not the only treatment that has helped children and adults recover from vaccine damage, but it is the one that
is the focus of this article. I will describe how homeopathy can bring about a true cure for the harm that vaccines have caused
to children and adults.

The National Vaccine Information Center states a very sobering fact about vaccines:

Every vaccine recommended for use by government and doctors has been associated with hospitalisations,
injuries and deaths. There is no guarantee that a particular vaccine will be safe to give to a particular individual and
will not result in permanent injury or death."
Vaccine Damage Takes Many Forms

It is a tragedy when a normal young child suddenly starts losing the ability to speak sentences or even to speak words after
receiving vaccines. The ability to have positive social interactions with other children or adults can disappear in a matter of
days after vaccines have been given to children.

Intellectual development can be lost and even successful potty training skills can disappear. The ability to sit quietly, listen to a
story being read, accine Damage Takes Many Formsnd the ability to learn can suddenly be replaced with hand flapping, body
spinning, head banging, food allergies, asthma, agitation, hyperactivity, learning disabilities, chronic colds and fevers, constant
stomach pain, constipation, and a general failure to grow and thrive.

There are also serious consequences for adults who use vaccines. Formerly productive adults can lose their independence
and become paralyzed, infertile, chronically ill, and even die, because of vaccine damage. It happens every day, yet few
people make the connection between their illnesses and vaccine use.

Please see the previous article on identifying vaccine damage for additional information:

Have You or Your Children Been Damaged by Vaccines?

Hope for Recovery from Vaccineve vaccines completely deny any relationship between vaccines and the negative
health effects that people observe. Most physicians will insist that vaccine damage is extremely rare and will insist
that the changes are just coincidence. [2] Faced with this denial, it often takes years for people to put all the pieces
together.

By the time parents fully awaken to the harm that has occurred to their children, many have already resigned themselves to a
lifetime of caretaking their disabled children.

Some parents will even receive counsel from their physicians to give up their children to the care of the state, because they
have no treatments to offer and can offer no hope of recovery. Some physicians will try to convince parents that this is a
genetic problem that might be cured someday, but not in the near future.

The conventional medical care system leaves parents feeling like helpless victims without any good options.

The truth is there are good options for restoring health after vaccine damage, and homeopathy is one of them!

Read more at: GreenMedInfo

GAME OVER: GMO Science Fraud Shattered By Stunning Investigative Book Worthy Of
Nobel Prize - Altered Genes, Twisted Truth
March 8 2015 | From: NaturalNews

The science fraud game is over for the biotech mafia. After years of running its corporate con that
pushed dangerous poisons into the food supply and the fragile environment, the biotech industry's
lies are now exposed and meticulously deconstructed in an exhaustively researched new book
launching March 20.
The title of the book? Altered Genes, Twisted Truth - How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has
Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public by Steven Druker.

The Foreword of the book was authored by one of the most celebrated living scientists in the world: Jane Goodall, PhD, DBE
and UN Messenger of Peace. The derogatory "anti-science" slur used by biotech operatives (such as discredited biotech shill
Jon Entine) against other scientists won't work against Jane Goodall. Her legacy of science is irrefutably extraordinary, and
she has received more science awards and accolades than almost any other scientist living today.

What does Jane Goodall have to say about the total science fraud of GMOs and the corrupt biotech industry?

In her own words, Altered Genes, Twisted Truth is "...without doubt one of the most important books of the last 50 years."

She goes on to reveal the stunning truth about the outright corruption, fraud and disinformation that now characterizes the
biotech industry and the collusion of the FDA:

Altered Genes, Twisted Truth is the most chilling thing I've ever read. It's about the huge conspiracy by the big companies who
do genetic modification to keep the public from knowing the truth, to subvert the course of justice.

[GMOs are a] shocking corruption of the life forms of the planet.

...the huge conspiracy by the big companies who do genetic modification to keep the public from knowing the truth, to subvert
the course of justice.

...the general public and government decision makers have been hoodwinked by the clever and methodical twisting of the
facts and the propagation of many myths.

...a number of respected scientific institutions, as well as many eminent scientists, were complicit in this relentless spreading of
disinformation.

Steven Druker is a hero. He deserves at least a Nobel Prize.

...the commercialization of GE foods occurred through the unbelievably poor judgment -- if not downright corruption -- of the
US Food and Drug Administration (the FDA)... it apparently ignored (and covered up) the concerns of its own scientists and
then violated a federal statute and its own regulations by permitting GE foods to be marketed without any testing whatsoever.

The evidence further shows how the agency assured consumers that GE foods are just as safe as naturally produced ones --
and that their safety has been confirmed by solid scientific evidence -- despite the fact it knew that no such evidence existed.

...it was this fraud that truly enabled the GE food venture to take off. And he asserts that the fraud continues to deceive the
public and Congress, despite the fact that the lawsuit he initiated thoroughly exposed it.

...the mainstream media have been highly selective in what they report -- and have consistently failed to convey information
that would cause concern about these engineered products. Moreover, Druker demonstrates that the policies imposed by the
media magnates have been, in his words, 'not merely selective, but suppressive.'

...he relates several dramatic incidents in which journalists who tried to bring unsettling facts to light had their stories
altered or totally quashed by higher level executives.

...it appears that such publications are downright deceptive, not only portraying genetic engineering in a misleading manner,
but even misrepresenting some basic features of biology.

...even if these products did not entail higher risks, it's doubtful they could significantly reduce malnutrition or solve any major
problems of agriculture.

I want Natural News readers to help make this book a national bestseller

Let's help make this a bestseller! Pre-order the book now: Altered Genes, Twisted Truth - How the Venture to Genetically
Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public

Additional quotes about the book from other scientists

"Steven Druker has written one of the few books I have encountered, in my many years of public interest work, with
the capacity to drive major change in a major issue. What Ralph Nader's Unsafe at Any Speed was to the auto
industry and what Rachel Carson's Silent Spring was to synthetic pesticides, Altered Genes, Twisted Truth will be
to genetically engineered food. It is profoundly penetrating, illuminating, and compelling, and it could stimulate a
monumental and beneficial shift in our system of food production." -- Joan Levin, JD, MPH

"Altered Genes, Twisted Truth is a remarkable work that may well change the public conversation on one of the
most important issues of our day. If the numerous revelations it contains become widely known, the arguments
being used to defend genetically engineered foods will be untenable." -- Frederick Kirschenmann, Phd
Distinguished Fellow, Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Iowa State University, Author of Cultivating an
Ecological Conscience

"Druker's brilliant expos catches the promoters of GE food red-handed: falsifying data, corrupting regulators, lying
to Congress. He thoroughly demonstrates how distortions and deceptions have been piled one on top of another,
year after year, producing a global industry that teeters on a foundation of fraud and denial. This book is sure to
send shock waves around the world." -- Jeffrey M. Smith, international bestselling author of Seeds of Deception &
Genetic Roulette

"Altered Genes, Twisted Truth is very readable, thorough, logical and thought-provoking. Steven Druker exposes
shenanigans employed to promote genetic engineering that will surprise even those who have followed the ag-
biotech industry closely for years. I strongly recommend his book." -- Belinda Martineau, Ph.D., a co-developer of
 the first genetically engineered whole food and author of First Fruit: The Creation of the Flavr Savr Tomato and the
Birth of Biotech Foods

"Altered Genes, Twisted Truth reveals how the inception of molecular biotechnology ignited a battle between those
committed to scientific accuracy and the public interest and those who saw genetic engineering's commercial
potential. Steven Druker's meticulously researched book pieces together the deeply disturbing and tremendously
important history of the intertwined science and politics of GMOs. Understanding this ongoing struggle is a key to
understanding science in the modern world." -- Allison Wilson, PhD molecular geneticist, Science Director, The
Bioscience Resource Project

Steven Druker's investigation into the history of fraud and deceipt that ushered in the era of GMOs deserves
serious consideration before we take actions that will irreversibly alter the European food supply." -- Pat Thomas of
Beyond GM

Through its masterful marshalling of facts, it dispels the cloud of disinformation that has misled people into believing
that GE foods have been adequately tested and don't entail abnormal risk." --David Schubert, Ph.D. molecular
biologist and Head of Cellular Neurobiology, Salk Institute for Biological Studies

"As a former New York City prosecutor, I was shocked to discover how the FDA illegally exempted GE foods from
the rigorous testing mandated by federal statute. And as the mother of three young kids, I was outraged to learn
how America's children are being callously exposed to experimental foods that were deemed abnormally risky by
the FDA's own experts." -- Tara-Cook Littman, J.D.

"The evidence is comprehensive, clear, and compelling; and its credibility is irrefutable. No one has documented
other cases of irresponsible behavior by government regulators and the scientific establishment nearly as well as
Druker documents this one. His book should be widely read and thoroughly heeded." -- John Ikerd, Ph.D. Professor
Emeritus of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Missouri -- Columbia

"Altered Genes, Twisted Truth will stand as a landmark. It should be required reading in every university biology
course." -- Joseph Cummins, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Genetics, Western University, London, Ontario

"Steven Druker's meticulously documented, well-crafted, and spellbinding narrative should serve as a clarion call to
all of us. In particular, his chapter detailing the deadly epidemic of 1989-90 that was linked with a genetically
engineered food supplement is especially significant. I and my Mayo Clinic colleagues were active participants in
the attempt to identify the cause of this epidemic. Druker provides a comprehensive analysis of all the evidence and
also presents new findings from our work. Overall his discussion of this tragic event, as well as its ominous
implications, is the most comprehensive, evenly balanced and accurate account that I have read." -- Stephen
Naylor, PhD CEO and Chairman of MaiHealth Inc., Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, &
Pharmacology Mayo Clinic (1991-2001)

"Based on over 30 years of teaching computer science at universities and on extensive experience as a
programmer in private industry, I can state that Steven Druker has done an excellent job of demonstrating the
recklessness of the current practices of genetic engineering in comparison to the established practices of software
engineering. His book presents a striking contrast between the two fields, showing how software engineers
progressively developed greater awareness of the inherent risks of altering complex information systems and
accordingly developed more rigorous procedures for managing them while genetic technicians have largely failed
to do either, despite the fact that the information systems they alter are far more complex, and far less
comprehended, than any human-made system." -- Ralph Bunker, Phd

Publisher's description

This book uncovers the biggest scientific fraud of our age. It tells the fascinating and frequently astounding story of how the
massive enterprise to restructure the genetic core of the world's food supply came into being, how it advanced by consistently
violating the protocols of science, and how for more than three decades, hundreds of eminent biologists and esteemed
institutions have systematically contorted the truth in order to conceal the unique risks of its productsand get them onto our
dinner plates.

Altered Genes, Twisted Truth provides a graphic account of how this elaborate fraud was crafted and how it not only deceived
the general public, but Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Barack Obama and a host of other astute and influential individuals as well. The
book also exposes how the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was induced to become a key accomplice -- and how it
has broken the law and repeatedly lied in order to usher genetically engineered foods onto the market without the safety
testing that's required by federal statute. As a result, for fifteen years America's families have been regularly ingesting a group
of novel products that the FDA's own scientific staff had previously determined to be unduly hazardous to human health.
By the time this gripping story comes to a close, it will be clear that the degradation of science it documents has not only been
unsavory but unprecedented--and that in no other instance have so many scientists so seriously subverted the standards they
were trained to uphold, misled so many people, and imposed such magnitude of risk on both human health and the health of
the environment.

Is Your Family's Health Being Traded For Profit?

March 3 2015 | From: BoughtMovie

New documentary 'Bought' exposes the ugly truth behind vaccines, GMO's and Big Pharma

You're about to see how Wall Street has literally "BOUGHT" your and your family's health.

The food, vaccine, drug, insurance and health industry are a multi-BILLION dollar enterprise... focused more on profits than
human lives. The BOUGHT documentary takes viewers deep "inside the guts" of this despicable conspiracy...

Featuring exclusive interviews with the world's most acclaimed experts in research, medicine, holistic care and natural health...
Bought exposes the hidden (and deadly) story behind it all.

Click here to see the documentary online for free until March 6 2015.
The Fluoride Deception
March 2 2015 | From: FluorideActionNetwork

Dr. Paul Connett of the Fluoride Action Network has now interviewed Christopher Bryson in this
hard hitting video as the writer describes his discoveries about fluoride and its sinister connections
to major policy agencies in the U. S. Government and to manipulation of popular scientific
perception by major academic institutions such as Carnegie Mellon University.

He describes how a significant pollutant and industrial chemical by product of the smelting and phosphate fertilizer
industry was eventually turned into a miracle cure for tooth decay. And, Bryson describes how career professionals
were discredited and ruined in order to guard the dirty secrets of fluoride's adverse long term health effects.

Possibly one of the most important books to be published this decade - possibly in the last sixty years, "The Fluoride
Deception" by former BBC correspondent and award winning investigative reporter, Christopher Bryson was published in 2004
by Seven Stories Press.

This is the book that uncovered the incredible history behind the inception of the public health policy called water fluoridation. It
is the book that stripped away the secrecy of government cover-ups concerning the legal industrial battles of WWII and the
poisoning of farms and workers exposed to this insidious toxin with unfortunate lifelong consequences.

Taking ten years to write, The Fluoride Deception has spawned a firestorm of controversy as groups of scientists, researchers
and medical professionals around the world are now openly challenging the scientific, legal and ethical logic behind the
government's seeming inability to admit how many citizens have had their health compromised or ruined from long term
exposure to an accumulative poison that was once used in rat poison and is still used today in pesticides and agriculture.

Once you see this video, you will never think of your toothpaste or your tap water in quite the same way again.

A production of the Fluoride Action Network this video returns to its home on the FAN YouTube channel. The book is available
through bookstores and libraries.
Low-Serotonin Depression Theory Challenged
February 27 2015 | From: PsychCentral

A new paper challenges the prevailing opinion that depression is related to low levels of serotonin in
the gaps between nerve cells in the brain.

This theory has predominated for nearly 50 years and has led to the development of the commonly prescribed anti-
depressant medications called selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, or SSRIs. But it has never been proven.

The science behind many anti-depressant medications appears to be backwards, say the authors of a paper posted by the
journal Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

SSRIs keep the neurotransmitters (serotonin) levels high by blocking its re-absorption into the cells that release it.

But those serotonin-boosting medications actually make it harder for patients to recover, especially in the short term, said lead
author Paul Andrews, an assistant professor of psychology, neuroscience & behavior at McMaster University in Canada.

Its time we rethink what we are doing, Andrews says. We are taking people who are suffering from the most
common forms of depression, and instead of helping them, it appears we are putting an obstacle in their path to
recovery.
When depressed patients on SSRI medication do show improvement, it appears that their brains are actually overcoming the
effects of antidepressant medications, rather than being assisted directly by them. Instead of helping, the medications appear
to be interfering with the brains own mechanisms of recovery.

Weve seen that people report feeling worse, not better, for their first two weeks on antidepressants, Andrews
says.

This could explain why.

It is currently impossible to measure exactly how the brain is releasing and using serotonin, the researchers write, because
there is no safe way to measure it in a living human brain.

Instead, scientists must rely on measuring evidence about levels of serotonin that the brain has already metabolized, and by
extrapolating from studies using animals.

The best available evidence appears to show that there is more serotonin being released and used during depressive
episodes, not less, the authors say.

The new paper suggests that serotonin helps the brain adapt to depression by re-allocating its resources, giving more to
conscious thought and less to areas such as growth, development, reproduction, immune function, and the stress response.

Andrews, an evolutionary psychologist, has argued in previous research that antidepressants leave patients in worse shape
after they stop using them, and that most forms of depression, though painful, are natural and beneficial adaptations to stress.

Its Official, McDonalds And Monsanto Are Both Losing Money Fast
February 22 2015 | From: NaturalSociety

In a series of headlines that would pass as virtually unbelievable several years ago, mainstream
economists are sounding the alarm over the financial decline of both fast food giant McDonalds and
biotech juggernaut Monsanto.
CNN asks, Is McDonalds doomed? Business Insider declares that McDonalds Is Losing America as the company
fires its own CEO. Whats happening?

As it turns out, the world is starting to ask what theyre truly eating in their food and the new conglomerate of natural grocers
and restaurants are trailblazing the way into an entirely new economic environment. In other words: people are simply tired of
shoveling garbage into their bodies, and theyre not going to put up with it anymore.

Heres just a few of the ingredients you can find in many fast food meals:

Dimethylpolysiloxane A chemical known for its use in silicone breast implants, silly putty, and also chicken nuggets

Propylene glycol A laxative chemical and electronic cigarette filler that even e-cigarette companies are beginning to
phase out

Azodicarbonamide A chemical used in the creation of foamed plastic items like yoga mats

So are you surprised to find that many are turning away from fast food leaders like McDonalds?

Nations around the world are already rejecting the ensemble of artificial ingredients included in many staple McDonalds meal
options. Back in 2013, their attempts to expand operations in Bolivia were completely shut down by the reality that the Bolivian
citizens were not willing to purchase their fast food creations. As reported back in July of 2013:

McDonalds restaurants operated in Bolivia for 14 years, according to Hispanically Speaking. In 2002, they had to
shutter their final remaining 8 stores because they simply couldnt turn a profitand if you know fast food
companies, you know its not because they didnt try.

The Golden Arches sunk plenty of money into marketing and campaigningtrying to get the food-loving Bolivians
to warm to their French fries and burgers, but it simply wasnt happening.
The news comes as Monsanto continues to spend millions in attempts to stop GMO labeling campaigns around the nation,
funding opposition groups and ensuring that you dont know whats in your food. After all, theres a reason that 96% of
Monsanto shareholders absolutely do not want GMO labeling legislation to pass within the US it could hurt business.

As information continues to spread on key issues like the prevalence of toxic substances within fast food meals and the reality
behind GMOs and their secrecy, there is no doubt that these two companies (and many others) will experience the economic
backlash. Will they change in order to meet the new economic shift?

Read the full story at: NaturalSociety

"Facebook Must Shut Down The Anti-Vaxxers"

February 21 2015 | From: Time

"Mark Zuckerberg should unfriend the crazies before more people get hurt"
Comment: The following article is from one of the worst-offending cabal publications. If the reasoning of these sell-
out writers was not so flawed and scary it would be comical. It has been proven that vaccines cause damage and are
full of all sorts of heavy metals and poisons - but here we have the mainstream media trying to cover it all up again
whilst going after the 'conspiracy theorists' because people are waking upto all the cabal lies and they are scared.

Time magazine writer Jeffrey Kluger, has suggested that Facebook should censor the posts on Facebook that conflict with
medical science. Facebook, has been known to abruptly shut down accounts and pages for no apparent reason, and has
admitted to censoring pages for key words. So, it wouldnt be a particularly new concept to the social media giant.

Whatever your opinions on vaccinations are, one thing is clear every one is entitled to their own choices and views.

There is much fear when it comes to vaccinations, whether getting them or not getting them. One thing that has not been
remembered in this debate, is that people have been consenting or not to vaccines in the United States for decades. If the
state can force people to receive the vaccines, who owns our body? Beside the point, suggesting that Facebook censor the
anti-vaxx movement must mean one thing they are gaining momentum apparently.

Facebook Must Shut Down the Anti-Vaxxers

Mark Zuckerberg has never been famous for his reading choices. No one knows or cares if the founder of Facebook
got around to Moby Dick when he was at Harvard. But in January, Zuckerberg launched an online book club, offering
reading recommendations to members every two weeks.

Earlier suggestions included such important works as Steven Pinkers The Better Angels of Our Nature and Sudhir
Venkateshs Gang Leader for a Day.

But Zuckerberg dropped something of a small bombshell with his most recentand most excellentchoice, On Immunityby
Eula Biss. Its a thoughtful exploration of whats behind the irrational fear and suspicion in the anti-vaccine community, as well
as a full-throated call for parents to heed medical wisdom and get their kids vaccinated. The science is completely
clear, Zuckerberg writes, vaccinations work and are important for the health of everyone in our community.

So kudos to Zuckerberg for getting the truth out and challenging the lies. And shame on Zuckerberg for enabling those lies,
too.

Social media sites can do an exceedingly good job of keeping people connected and, more important, spreading the word
about important social issues. (Think the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge would have raised the $100 million it did for research into
Lou Gehrigs disease if people couldnt post the videos of themselves being heroically doused?) But its long been clear the
sites can be used perniciously too.

Want to spend some time in the birther swamp, trading conspiracy theories with people who absolutely, positively can tell you
the Kenyan hospital in which President Obama was born? You can find them online. Ditto the climate-denying cranks and the
9/11 truthers.

But the anti-vaxxers have a particular power. People who buy the nonsense on a birther or truther page cant do much more
than join that loony community and howl nonsense into the online wind. Climate change denial is a little more dangerous
because every person who comes to believe that global warming is a massive hoax makes it a tiny, incremental bit harder to
enact sensible climate policy.

Anti-vaxxers, however, do their work at the grass-roots, retail, one-on-one level. Convince Mother A of the fake dangers of
vaccines and you increase the odds that she wont vaccinate Child B - and perhaps Children C, D or E either. And every
unvaccinated child in her brood increases the risk to the neighborhood, the school, the community - the entire herd, as the
epidemiologists put it. The multi-state measles outbreak that began in Disneyland, along with the epidemics of mumps and
whooping cough in Columbus, Ohio and throughout California, have all been fueled by falling vaccine rates.

One thing that would help - something Zuckerberg could do with little more than a flick of the switch, as could Twitter CEO
Dick Costolo and the other bosses of other sites - is simply shut the anti-vaxxers down. Really. Pull their pages, block their
posts, twist the spigot of misinformation before more people get hurt.

The very idea of muzzling any information - even misinformation - will surely send libertarians to their fainting couches.
Similarly, people who believe they understand the Constitution but actually dont will immediately invoke the First Amendment.
But of course theyre misguided. Is Facebook a government agency? No, its not. Is Zuckerberg a government official? No,
hes not. Then this is not a First Amendment issue. Read your Constitution.

Its not as if the folks at Facebook arent clear about the kinds of things they will and wont allow on the site, providing a brief
listing and a detailed description of what are considered no-go areas. You may not credibly threaten others, or organize acts
of real-world violence, is one rule, so nobody would get away with posting instructions for, say, how to build a pressure cooker
bomb.

There is nothing in the regulations that specifically prohibits trafficking in bogus medical information, but the first section of the
policy statement begins, Safety is Facebooks top priority, and then goes on to say We remove content and may escalate to
law enforcement when we perceive a genuine risk of physical harm, or a direct threat to public safety. (Emphasis added.)

Its worth wondering if Facebook would consider a page arguing that HIV does not cause AIDS and that therefore condoms
are not necessary a threat to public safety. What about one that told teens that bogus research shows its OK to drive drunk if
youve had no more than, say, three beers?

If the site managers didnt block these pages and a multi-car crack-up or a cluster of HIV infections occurred as a result, would
they wish they theyd made a different decision? Its hard to know. (As of publication time, Facebook had not responded to
TIMEs request for a comment on, or further statement about, its policies.)

Facebook is equal parts town square, medium of communication and commercial bazaar - complete with ads. And it does all
of those jobs well. What the site shouldnt be is a vector for lies - especially lies that can harm children. Free speech is not in
play here. This should be an easy call.

US Federal Register Drafting Plans To Vaccinate All Adults

We vaccine truthers told you this was coming. Its whats been behind the entire contrived measles scam. Why else has the
corporate-whore mainstream media created national hysteria over a few cases of measles with NO DEATHS therefrom, even
though there have been at least 108 DEATHS FROM THE MEASLES VACCINE in the last few years.

Maybe now some of you who have blindly championed toxic vaccines for kids will begin to look more closely at the brain-
damaging effects of vaccines on adults, such as Alzheimers and other neurological disorders, proven to be caused by poisons
such as mercury and aluminum in the shots. Multiply the already high numbers of vaccine-damaged adults many times over
and start picturing masses of your fellow zombies on the horizon.
9 Ways To Boost Your Confidence When Your Doctor Pressures To Vaccinate
February 15 2015 | From: VacTruth

Contrary to what some doctors and officials might tell you, your child does not need shots to attend
public school. Legally, you can receive a vaccine exemption in all fifty states.

Sometimes, even in states with stricter laws, getting the vaccine exemption is the easy part. The hard part, for some
parents, is having that conversation with a doctor and just saying no to vaccines.

Also see: The vaccine safety myth

One government survey revealed that over 28 percent of parents question, delay, or refuse vaccines, including nine percent
who accept a vaccine for their child even though they are not comfortable with it. Dont allow yourself to be part of the nine
percent who accepted a vaccine under pressure. [1]

1. Be prepared for what your doctor will tell you at your childs appointment.

Doctors are trained to use certain techniques when parents question vaccination. This training is provided by pharmaceutical
companies and other organisations that receive funding from vaccine makers. If you want to learn more about the specific
responses doctors will offer, you can read this short article. [2]

When you share a concern, doctors will often respond with scripted answers, such as, we are lucky to be able to protect our
babies from many serious diseases with vaccines and vaccines do not cause autism, but they are trained to provide
empathy rather than unbiased, scientific information.

2. Identify why saying no to your childs doctor is hard for you.

Are you uncomfortable because your childs doctor has many degrees and awards on the wall? Are you someone who avoids
arguments or confrontations? Do you consider yourself shy or quiet? Are you worried about your child getting sick if you
decline vaccines? Are you still adjusting to being a new parent?

If you can determine why you are struggling to discuss vaccines with your doctor, you will be able to decide if you need to
address that challenge, or if it is irrelevant to your conversation about vaccines.

3. Practice your own scripted responses when your doctor pressures you to vaccinate.

What will you say when your doctor tells you its time to vaccinate your child? Which response is most comfortable for you?
Not today. My child is getting over a cold.

Our child is fine. Thank you.

We are delaying vaccines for now.

I have decided not to get this vaccine.

Im doing some research about vaccines.

We will not be vaccinating at this time.

4. Listen to your mama (or papa) bear instinct.

Ive heard it called by lots of names: mothers intuition, motherly instinct, sixth sense, subconscious mind, trusting your gut.
Whatever you call it, listen to it.

There are so many times when we have that gut feeling about something, and we realize later that we were right. If
vaccinating your child doesnt feel right, trust your instinct. Give yourself a little more time to research and confidently decide
if vaccination is right or wrong for your family.

5. Develop a network of supportive friends.

This suggestion has many benefits, including the support you will receive in your challenging and rewarding role as a parent.
Your support system can be made of family members, friends, and people you meet online.

Spending time with these individuals gives you a chance have easy discussions about vaccines with others, which will make
the conversations you have with your childs doctor easier. You will also be able to share information with each other about
research, friendly pediatricians, and ways to stay healthy naturally. And, having supportive people in your life always boosts
your confidence and self-esteem!

6. Ask for the vaccine package insert.

When you take your child to a doctor appointment, ask the nurse or the doctor for a package insert from the vaccine your child
is scheduled to receive. You will not be troubling or bothering them! These inserts, straight from the manufacturer, are much
more informative than the vaccine safety sheet that the doctor often gives you after vaccination, which is printed by the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

You can tell the healthcare provider that you will take the information home and read it if you want to decide about the vaccine
for a future visit. Then, you can carefully read the side effects and ingredients in a relaxed, quiet setting.

You must also be aware that not all ingredients are listed on the package insert, or anywhere. Some ingredients, such as
peanut oil, are generally regarded as safe, so they are not listed but may certainly be dangerous for children. [3]

7. Practice confidence in other areas of your life.

If you feel intimidated, insecure, or inferior at the doctors office, you may be able to boost your confidence by being more
assertive in other ways. Ask your server for a modification to your entree, or order something that is not on the menu. Ask for
help with housework or errands when you need it. Accept help when someone offers it to you. Make time for yourself to do
something you enjoy, even if only for a few minutes each day.

I know, when you are a busy parent, these reminders are not always easy to do! Sometimes, the discomfort we experience
when talking with doctors about vaccines is a reminder that we need to boost our self-esteem and know our self-worth.

8. Find a supportive health care provider.

Doctors are now being encouraged not to refuse to provide services to families who do not vaccinate. However, some doctors
still tell parents they will no longer treat their child if parents do not vaccinate. [4] Talk with other parents to discover a doctor or
nurse practitioner who will be respectful of your wishes not to vaccinate.

Chiropractors can be a wonderful resource for families, for preventive care and for treating illness, as well as sharing the
wealth of knowledge they have about holistic health, and their offices are usually free from pressure to vaccinate.

9. Reconsider the need for frequent well-child checkups.

For some families, routine visits to the doctor may not be necessary. Is your child growing well? Are they in good health? Most
well-baby check-ups are primarily to keep your child on the CDC vaccination schedule. If you are choosing not to vaccinate, or
to delay vaccinations, your child may not need to follow the same schedule for visits as suggested by your clinic or hospital.

Conclusion

Discussing vaccines with your childs health care provider is not always easy. With time, research, and support, these
conversations will become so comfortable for you that you will wonder why you ever worried about telling your childs doctor
that you are saying no to vaccines.

If you would like to know which vaccine exemptions available in your state, as mentioned above, click here.

Parents, how did you just say no to vaccines? If you have had this conversation with your childs doctor or nurse, please share
your experience in the comment section, so other parents can feel encouraged and empowered to make the an informed
choice for their child.

Addiction Is Not Addictive

February 14 2015 | From: Scoop

Whether someone becomes addicted to drugs has much more to do with their childhood and their
quality of life than with the drug they use or with anything in their genes.
This is one of the more startling of the many revelations in the best book I've read yet this year: Chasing the Scream:
The First and Last Days of the War on Drugs by Johann Hari.

We've all been handed a myth. The myth goes like this: Certain drugs are so powerful that if you use them enough they will
take over. They will drive you to continue using them. It turns out this is mostly false. Only 17.7 percent of cigarette smokers
can stop smoking using a nicotine patch that provides the same drug.

Of people who have tried crack in their lives, only 3 percent have used it in the past month and only 20 percent were ever
addicted. U.S. hospitals prescribe extremely powerful opiates for pain every day, and often for long periods of time, without
producing addiction. When Vancouver blocked all heroin from entering the city so successfully that the "heroin" being sold had
zero actual heroin in it, the addicts' behavior didn't change.

Some 20 percent of U.S. soldiers in Vietnam were addicted to heroin, leading to terror among those anticipating their return
home; but when they got home 95 percent of them within a year simply stopped. (So did the Vietnamese water buffalo
population, which had started eating opium during the war.) The others soldiers had been addicts before they went and/or
shared the trait most common to all addicts, including gambling addicts: an unstable or traumatic childhood.

Most people (90 percent according to the U.N.) who use drugs never get addicted, no matter what the drug, and most who do
get addicted can lead normal lives if the drug is available to them; and if the drug is available to them, they will gradually stop
using it.

But, wait just a minute. Scientists have proven that drugs are addictive, haven't they?

Well, a rat in a cage with absolutely nothing else in its life will choose to consume huge quantities of drugs. So if you can make
your life resemble that of a rat in a cage, the scientists will be vindicated. But if you give a rat a natural place to live with other
rats to do happy things with, the rat will ignore a tempting pile of "addictive" drugs.

And so will you. And so will most people. Or you'll use it in moderation. Before the War on Drugs began in 1914 (a U.S.
substitute for World War I?), people bought bottles of morphine syrup, and wine and soft drinks laced with cocaine. Most never
got addicted, and three-quarters of addicts held steady respectable jobs.

Is there a lesson here about not trusting scientists? Should we throw out all evidence of climate chaos? Should we dump all
our vaccines into Boston Harbor? Actually, no. There's a lesson here as old as history: follow the money. Drug research is
funded by a federal government that censors its own reports when they come to the same conclusions as Chasing the
Scream, a government that funds only research that leaves its myths in place.

Climate deniers and vaccine deniers should be listened to. We should always have open minds. But thus far they don't seem
to be pushing better science that can't find funding. Rather, they're trying to replace current beliefs with beliefs that
have less basis behind them. Reforming our thinking on addiction actually requires looking at the evidence being produced by
dissident scientists and reformist governments, and it's pretty overwhelming.

So where does this leave our attitudes toward addicts? First we were supposed to condemn them. Then we were supposed to
excuse them for having a bad gene. Now we're supposed to feel sorry for them because they have horrors they cannot face,
and in most cases have had them since childhood?

There's a tendency to view the "gene" explanation as the solider excuse. If 100 people drink alcohol and one of them has a
gene that makes him unable to ever stop, it's hard to blame him for that. How could he have known? But what about this
situation: Of 100 people, one of them has been suffering in agony for years, in part as a result of never having experienced
love as a baby.

That one person later becomes addicted to a drug, but that addiction is only a symptom of the real problem. Now, of course, it
is utterly perverse to be inquiring into someone's brain chemistry or background before we determine whether or not to show
them compassion.

But I have a bit of compassion even for people who cannot resist such nonsense, and so I appeal to them now: Shouldn't we
be kind to people who suffer from childhood trauma? Especially when prison makes their problem worse?

But what if we were to carry this beyond addiction to other undesirable behaviors? There are other books presenting similarly
strong cases that violence, including sexual violence, and including suicide, have in very large part similar origins to those Hari
finds for addiction.

Of course violence must be prevented, not indulged. But it can best be reduced by improving people's lives, especially their
young lives but importantly also their current lives.
Bit by bit, as we have stopped discarding people of various races, gender, sexual orientation, and disabilities as worthless, as
we begin to accept that addiction is a temporary and non-threatening behavior rather than the permanent state of a lesser
creature known as "the addict," we may move on to discarding other theories of permanence and genetic determination,
including those related to violent criminals.

Someday we may even outgrow the idea that war or greed or the automobile is the inevitable outcome of our genes.

Somehow blaming everything on drugs, just like taking drugs, seems much easier.

Vitamin C Campaigner Begins Month-Long Walk

February 5 2015 | From: 3News

A Whangarei police officer who says he was cured of leukaemia after taking vitamin C intravenously
has begun a month-long walk to Wellington to raise funds so more people can be given the
treatment.

Two years ago Anton Kuraia was given two months to live after his second cycle of chemotherapy, but he says taking
vitamin C changed his life and could change others. Just a couple of years ago Mr Kuraia was dying from leukaemia .
But now he's on the journey of a lifetime.

Mr Kuraia puts it down to taking [mega doses of] vitamin C.

Also see these related articles:

3News: Looking Elsewhere for a Cure for Cancer

New Zealand Herald: Taking on Big C with Vitamin C
TVNZ: Miracle Man
Uncensored: New Zealand Medical Authorities Continue to Ignore a Potential Cure for Swine Flu

"Major part of what I did certainly gave me the time to get everything else on board, like the diet and the juice and
all that sort of stuff, and all that together has got me to where I am right now."
Mr Kuraia drew inspiration from a TV3 story on Allan Smith who contracted swine flu and says he was woken from a coma
with a high dose of vitamin C.

"It does work. We have evidence it does work. Anton's here today and so am I."

Taking intravenous doses of vitamin C is controversial and mainstream medicine hasn't made up its mind yet, but Dr Damien
Voijcek, who treated Mr Kuraia, says it's a tool he uses.

"It can certainly be helpful in patients with cancer," says Dr Voijcek. "I think times are changing and many of my
colleagues are more receptive to it."

Three-hundred friends and colleagues walked the first 34 kilometres with Mr Kuraia.

Today is just the first day and tomorrow Mr Kuraia will have to get up again tomorrow and do the same distances for a month
until he's completed the 809 kilometres to the steps of Parliament in Wellington.

Mr Kuraia looks fit and able now, but his family's still worried.

"My mum has had a word with me and she's a little bit anxious, only in that she's worried that if I push myself too
hard this cancer might come back, if I push myself too hard. So I'm a little bit anxious but I'll take care of myself and
we'll be fine, we'll be fine."

If Mr Kuraia stays well he'll reach Wellington on March 3.

See the video at: 3News

USA Today Columnist Calls For Arrest And Imprisonment Of Vaccine Skeptics
February 2 2015 | From: NaturalNews

Now we finally come to the real agenda of the vaccine industry. After vaccines have been
repeatedly documented by the Natural News Lab to contain neurotoxic chemicals such as mercury,
formaldehyde and MSG; after vaccine shots have been repeatedly shown to kill people who take
them; and after flu shots have been exhaustively shown to be based on no science whatsoever
- with vaccine manufacturers openly admitting there are no clinical trials to show they even work -
the rabid vaccine pushers are unveiling their end game: throw vaccine resistors in prison.
This is the call by USA Today columnist Alex Berezow. "Parents who do not vaccinate their children should go to
jail," he writes in this USA Today column.

And just to be clear, what Berezow means is that parents who do not vaccinated their children no matter how toxic the
vaccine ingredients really are should be thrown in prison. There is no exemption being discussed or recommended that
would allow parents to object to vaccines because of the neurotoxic chemicals they contain (such as the heavy metal mercury,
still found in flu shots given to children in America).

There is also no discussion that informed parents might reasonably object to vaccines based on the recent confession of a top
CDC whistleblower who reveals how the CDC committed scientific fraud to bury scientific evidence showing a link between
vaccines and autism.

But continuing with the imprisonment idea now being touted by USA Today, it begs the practical question: What exactly should
happen after the parents are thrown in prison? Well, of course, the state will take custody of the children because they are now
parentless.

So the suggestion that parents who seek to protect their children from toxic vaccine ingredients should be thrown in jail is
simultaneously a call for the state to seize custody of all children who are not yet vaccinated with Big Pharma's toxic
vaccines.

Read the full story at: NaturalNews

Vaccines Cause Sudden Death, Proves Document Hidden By Big Pharma For Two Years
January 31 2015 | From: NaturalNews

An Italian court has unearthed a formerly classified document that proves vaccines cause death, and
that vaccine companies don't want you to know this.
As published on the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) website, a 1,271-page report by British drug firm
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) reveals that certain combination vaccines administered to children are known to cause
sudden death, but the company chose to obscure and conceal this in official safety reports.

The document deals specifically with the Infanrix Hexa vaccine (combined diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B,
inactivated poliomyelitis and haemophilus influenza type B) made by GSK, as well as the Prevenar 13 vaccine by Pfizer and
several other vaccines.

It explains that, contrary to the skewed data presented by GSK suggesting that dozens of sudden death cases following
vaccination were not linked to Infanrix Hexa, the same data broken down by time of occurrence reveals that the vaccine was,
in fact, directly linked to the deaths.

The devil is in the details, as they say, and in this case GSK masked these details by clumping together the majority of the
deaths that occurred within 10 days following vaccination with the select few that occurred after 10 days. By doing this, the
drug giant made it appear as though sudden deaths were spread out over a much longer period than they actually were, which
it claimed served as evidence that the vaccine was not the cause of sudden death.

Table 36 in the GlaxoSmithKline Biological Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance report to Regulatory Authority shows that
nearly all of the 67 reported deaths following Infanrix Hexa administration occurred within the first 10 days. Only two of these
reported deaths occurred after 10 days, and yet GSK reported them all together as transpiring sporadically across the entire
20-day period, insinuating that they were merely coincidental.

"[I]f one analyses the data looking at deaths in [the] first 10 days after administration of vaccine and compares it to
the deaths in the next 10 days, it is clear that 97% of deaths (65 deaths) in the infants below 1 year, occur in the
first 10 days and 3% (2 deaths) occur in the next 10 days," explains Child Health Safety.

90% of deaths occurred within five days of vaccination An even closer look at the data tables, which GSK
deliberately withheld from public view, reveals an even more shocking fact -- the vast majority of sudden deaths actually
occurred within five days of Infanrix Hexa administration, which further implicates the vaccine. A shocking 90% of the deaths,
60 of them, occurred within five days of the shot being given. And 75% of the deaths occurred within three days of the shot.

"The clustering of deaths around the time of vaccination demonstrates a link between the vaccination and the
sudden deaths," adds Child Safety First. "It indicates this is not by chance as otherwise the deaths would be spread
 across the entire 20 days. Rather than showing the total deaths each day, GlaxoSmithKline disguised the clustering
of deaths around vaccination."

This is all quite revealing -- the stuff of lawsuits, no doubt, with which GSK is more than familiar. As you may recall, GSK is the
same drug company that was fined $3 billion for promoting antidepressant drugs for off-label uses. The case has since been
dubbed the largest health fraud settlement in U.S. history, which says a whole lot about the integrity of this company.

Should GSK ever be found guilty of deliberately withholding critical safety data that, while it probably would have cut into the
company's bottom line to make it public, may have saved children from early death, it could potentially make history again as
earning the title of the most shamefully greedy and profiteering corporation in the world (next to Monsanto, of course).

If drug and vaccine companies are really about helping people, why don't they develop treatments
for disease rather than vaccines?

One of the biggest problems with blanket vaccination programs that seek to inject all children against communicable diseases
that may or may not ever even emerge is that the weakest children always end up suffering -- or dying. A better approach, at
least from a humanitarian perspective, would be to develop effective treatments for these diseases so that children who
contract them are the only ones being treated, rather than preemptively "treating" everyone, both healthy and sick, with
vaccines.

This would be the expected and proper approach if Western medicine really was all about preventing disease spread and
promoting public health. But the sad truth is that public health is not the priority -- profits are the priority (and depending upon
whom you talk to, so is eugenics). Vaccines are a complete guessing game, because nobody can ever really know how an
individual will react to being injected.

"[N]o effective treatments for basic well-known longstanding childhood diseases have been developed,"
explains Child Health Safety. "That is a scandal in the scientific 21st Century. If there were effective treatments
vaccines would not be needed."

And it is precisely because vaccines would become obsolete that the drug and vaccine industries continue to play medicine
rather than actually produce medicine. Vaccines, as we recently covered, are a major source of income for the drug industry,
which now gets paid by the government (taxpayers) for so-called "emergency" vaccines, many of which it never even ends up
manufacturing.

"Educated parents can either get their children out of harm's way or continue living inside one of the largest most
evil lies in history, that vaccines -- full of heavy metals, viral diseases, mycoplasma, fecal material, DNA fragments
from other species, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (a sterilizing agent) -- are a miracle of modern medicine," wrote
Andrew Baker at NSNBC.me.

Clive de Carle: How You Can Restore Your Health And Enable Your Body To Self-
Repair From Virtually Any Disease Or Affliction
January 17 2015 | From: WakeUpKiwi

This article contains the key points from two interviews with Clive de Carle on the Cosmic Voice
channel on Blogtalk Radio, from November 9 and November 30, 2014.
Clive has many informative videos on Youtube and his website may be found at www.ancientpurity.com.
He encourages people to make contact with him and he may be reached at clivedecarle@gmail.com.
Clive also recommends The Institute for Optimal Nutrition at www.ion.ac.uk.

The notes below were taken from the two Blogtalk radio shows featuring Clive which may be streamed online or downloaded
from here and here.

About Clive

Clive de Carle is an acclaimed speaker in the field of natural health and longevity. A former organic farmer, for over 20 years
he has worked in health performance optimisation, providing cutting edge dietary consultancy and enabling thousands of
clients to reverse the signs of illness and regain optimum health.

Clive now holds his own events, speaks at many natural health and innovative events. He hosted The Health Revolution
Show and interviews Health and Healing experts from around the world. Clive holds weekend workshops regularly visit his
website www.healthgenius.uk and see the events page for all details of his talks.

Clive's passion for natural health was triggered initially by a major health crisis in 1986.

A healthy man of 33, Clive was prescribed a course of antibiotics by his doctor for a skin condition, which left him
hospitalised with Type 1 diabetes and advanced rheumatoid arthritis with no hope of a cure. With the doctors unable to help,
Clive sought out a cure himself using nutrition and within one year Clive found he had completely reversed the arthritis.

Clives passion is helping people regain their health naturally, he see's clients whenever he can, in person or via skype. If
you'd like a consultation with Clive or you'd like to come to one of his events please contact him.

Some Truths About Disease

The flu is caused by a lack of vitamin D in Winter. There is no such thing a 'flu season' - that is marketing hype.

The human brain is made from water, fat and cholesterol. Low fat / low cholesterol / low salt diets are deliberately
misleading, hey will harm you and will eventually cause Alzheimers. Six tablespoons of coconut oil a day will cure
Alzheimers as the fats allow the body to repair the brain.
 There is no such thing as good cholesterol and bad cholesterol - this is disinformation. Your brain is largely made of
cholesterol and this also is used by your body as a bandage for arteries.

Poisoning from Glyphosate (Roundup) can be reversed by taking brewers yeast.

A Russian scientist has proven that using frequency, GMO seeds can be reverted to their original non-GMO form.

People are told that their family history and genes determine whether they are susceptible to heart attacks or certain
diseases - but much of this is programming. Any gene-based type of disorder can be eliminated by ensuring optimal health
as described here.

90% of pharmaceutical drugs do not work on 60% of people - and this data came directly from an industry insider.

If Doctors know a cure for something they are under no legal obligation to tell you. 80% of Doctors would not take chemo,
but they must recommend it to you for if they do not they will be struck off.

The 'normal' Doctors job is not to save your life but to put you on a treatment.

There are only 3 reasons why the human body becomes ill:

1. Physical damage, such as a car crash

2. Toxic poisoning

3. Nutrient deficiency

Nobody gets ill from a lack of pharmaceutical drugs, so how can these drugs ever be the answer?
(other than in a few cases).

Emergency Room (ER) medicine is very different from 'normal' medicine. 'Normal' Doctors can offer you drugs, surgery or
radiation. They cannot give you nutritional advice and their training is shaped in such a way as to avoid anything that will
really work. Their study only includes half a day on nutrition.

If you go into an ER, their job is to save your life. The ER Doctor uses Magnesium Sulphate (Epsom Salts) injections to
stop heart attacks and strokes. ER Doctors know this trick but normal Doctors are not taught this, because a patient cured is
a customer lost.

Ask a Chiropractor or an Osteopath: Can you cure Arthritis? If they say no they are useless.If they say yes they might be
useful. Ask them if they do post-surgery cases as these are the most difficult ones. The nervous system is most often
ignored by the mainstream medical apparatus.

Various Diseases & Cancer

If you are having problems with allergies you are most likely low in vitamins and minerals - you might be low in what is
termed as "normality'. If you take fulvic minerals you might find this takes care of the issue alone.But it also could be the
processed nature of the food that you are used to, it could also be the pasteurisation of dairy foods that you are used to.

It has been proven that many viruses may be defeated by high doses of Vitamin C alone. Add to that Colloidal Silver,
Selenium, MMS and Iodine, if you start piling one thing on top of another you could walk through a Leper colony kissing and
hugging people and be fine.

If the germ theory were true Doctors would be dropping like flies. It is about how healthy you are, not about the viruses.

The founder of German New Medicine was an Oncologist who canvassed his 20,000 patients to come to the conclusion
that there are reasons why certain people develop cancers in certain parts of their bodies and it is quite often linked to a life
trauma. He also noted that there are some parts of the body that just do not get cancer, such as the heart.
 3BP: 3 Bromopyrovate - Goes into the cancer cells and turns the Mitochondria off which is the energy system of the cells
and so cancer cells die 100% of the time.

And so it's not "is there a cure for cancer", because there are hundreds of them, it's "which one?"

But, in the first week after a cancer diagnosis the chances of the person dying of a heart attack go up 25% because of the
shock.

All of the charities that are begging for money to find a cure for cancer, they are not looking for a cure, they are looking to
further line the pockets of the Pharmaceutical industry - and they are looking for a treatment, a drug that makes you feel a bit
better while you die.

High doses of Vitamin C have cured cancer.

We are interested in health; and health by definition means that you are not ill.

Must-watch interview: Oncology nurse quits after discovering nutrition heals cancer

Restoring Health

What Clive recommends is that people learn how to be healthy again, because everybody is a self repairing unit.

Looking at a flock of birds or school of fish, and assuming that all the food they need is there - you can't tell the young
from the old. They all move at the same speed, and Human Beings left in the wild could also achieve that. If you put wild
animals in captivity and change their food, they get the same diseases that humans get. If you cut your finger and you are
very healthy it will heal much faster than if you are not well.

To get your health back you need about 100 vitamins, minerals, essential fats, amino acids, sunshine and proper water.
Seventy of them are in one product alone, which is real [celtic] sea salt.

Many people who have a problem with fat, especially around the belly find that when they take these supplements that
because they are de-toxing and re-mineralising that the fat just drops off because the body no longer has to store toxins in
fat anymore.

Anybody who is not feeling 100% has to look at whether they are physically damaged, toxically poisoned or nutritionally
deficient. Most people will be able to answer yes to the last two.

Salt

They call it Celtic salt, it is the natural grey wet stuff that amongst many other things normalises blood pressure. It is a very
good starting point for restoring health as it contains many helpful minerals and trace elements.

Supermarket table salt is bleached and is no good for you. Rock salts are nowhere near as good for you as Celtic salt.

Your body is self regulating, you know exactly how much salt you want on your food. Forget everything you have been told
about salt, they were probably lying or ignorant.

Salt is good for you and you can put a pinch of it in water to make it softer, easier to drink and much more hydrating to the
cells, as the salt changes the structure of water.

Magnesium

Magnesium is like the opposite of Calcium, and is very good for arthritis. Magnesium spray used on sore or inflexible joints
will work in 5 minutes. Magnesium carries oxygen to all of your cells.

A deficiency in Magnesium by be notes by symptoms such as muscle cramps, restless leg syndrome, eye twitches, and
anxiety, hiccups, panic attacks, heart attacks, cancer and strokes.

A stressed person burns up 3 times more Magnesium and Vitamin C that an unstressed person.
 Magnesium is not best taken internally because too much will move the bowels - and so a Magnesium deficiency will
cause constipation.

Calcium cause muscles to contract which Magnesium causes muscles to relax. Magnesium helps over 300 emzyme
processes in the human body and it also relaxes you. Magnesium Chloride baths help with getting good sleep. People taking
a Calcium supplement may want to consider stopping this as they may be getting too much Calcium.

Vitamins & Minerals

Vitamin C is the answer to every virus because no virus can survive a high enough dosage of Vitamin C. It has been
tested on everything from Anthrax, to TB, to Smallpox to Pneumonia, Mumps, Measles, Scarlet Fever and Dyptheria.

Everything they give you a vaccine for can be overcome with Vitamin C. This as been known for about 60 years and has
been deliberately obscured and not taught to Doctors. This knowledge would be very bad for business.

High doses of Vitamin C have also cured cancer and helped to repair eyesight. With the prevalence of pharmaceutical
drugs in recent decades, pretty drug reps with clever sales pitches have fooled Doctors (who know no better) into pushing
drugs that cause more harm than good in most cases.

You should also take a good Multivitamin which contans Selenium and Zinc, along with a good multi-mineral. Minerals are
just as important as vitamins.

If you are buying vitamins from the supermarket then you are pretty much wasting your time and money as they will be
synthetic.

Iodine

Doctors once had a much higher success rate using easily accessible, cheap materials. About 100 years ago Iodine was
used as the great cure-all. Iodine is all about intelligence, IQ, proper hormonal balance, adrenals and glands.

A lack of Iodine causes thyroid issues and in pregnant mothers, will reduce the IQ of the baby. Many people who have
brain fog find that Iodine helps this lift.

Iodine is a great protector against radiation.

Organic Sulphur / Methylsulphonyl Methane (MSM)

Organic Sulphur (Sulfur) is another essential that is missing from out food chain because of chemical fertilisers.

Among many other things Sulphur is helpful in tumour reduction because it binds with heavy metal toxins and allows the
body to expel them.

Sulphur helps a range of things including eyesite, erectile dysfunction and the healing of scar tissue.

Onions, garlic, brocolli and cauliflower are good food-based sources of sulphur but in low quantities

Fulvic Minerals

On top of everything else we need soil-based plant-derived minerals and the best way to get these are by way of Fulvic
minerals. These come from the earth and a few drops taken in water will make you feel years younger when you wake up
the next day. People have reported many positive benefits from taking Fulvic minerals, including the elimination of morning
sickness.

If you are craving sugar or chocolate, it is most probably because you are low in chromium. The Fulvic minerals give you
the trace elements that are missing from processed foods and that have been filtered out of water because you can't mix
Chlorine with these minerals and Chlorine is present in tap water.

People who take the Multiminerals and Fulvic minerals notice that apart from having more energy that their apetite
normalises.
Other Recommendations

Probiotics are also important because of the damaged gut we all have from chlorine in water and the use of antibiotics -
which have also made their way into the water supply.

The best way is to fix the gut, because many people have a flora issue because of taking Pharmaceutical drugs or from
too much Chlorine from tap water, and they have damaged their gut lining. This can be fixed by giving their stomach a rest
from these things for a while and by using probiotics to restore their stomach lining to normal.

If you are over 40 then digestive enzymes are good to take as well because as we get older we tend not to digest food so
well. These are taken just before meals.

People are enjoying incredible results in restoring their health, for example there is a product made from two types of egg
plant that cured 96% of skin cancers in 85,000 people tested in Europe.

gcMAF is one of the most important revelations - it was discovered 24 years ago. It is a substance that is manufactured in
the liver and it has been determined that if a person has a disease such as cance that it wipes out gcMAF.

European clinics that are using the gcMAF treatment are getting 84% success rates in reversing stage 4 cancer in
patients, with an average tumor size reduction of 25% - 40% in one week. It is taken as a probiotic supplement and also by
way of intramuscuar injection and sepository.

gcMAF re-starts the immune system and allows the body to heal itself. The treatment is also bringing 25% of Autistic
children out of Autism, and so combined with other Autistic protocols there is much hope for these children to recover.

gcMAF is also helping with a range of other ailments including Alzheimers and Arthritis. The reason it works with so many
ailments is because it is not about the illness, but the patients lack of health. gcMAF 'switches health back on again'. gcMAF
is expensive but it is very powerful and very fast acting.

30 years ago the Russians began experimenting with Peptides and in many cases people have actually been able to re-
grow limbs that were cut off, including fingers with the nail.

Organics

Eating something with an 'organic' sticker slapped on the side of it doesn't mean a thing. Clive notes that he was an
organic farmer for 9 years and what he saw going on was terrible. That label was virtually meaningless. The definition of
'Organic' has been diluted to such a degree that the farmer can get away with most things and you are not going to know
about it.

Crops can be grown organically in ground that is completely devoid of minerals, so the plant may look alright and not have
been sprayed with chemicals but are you going to get any nutritional benefit from it?

With all of the hybridisation that has gone on we are eating unbalanced food. So many fruits and vegetables sold now are
seedless - how can they possibly be any good for you?

Water

In some places the water supply comes from recycled sewage and this should be avoided. Each year the remnants of
prescription drugs that cannot be removed from the water are cycling around and around and getting stronger over time.

Distilled water is very good but it is unbalanced and so you should at least put a pinch of Celtic salt into it, as while the
additives and impurities are removed - on an energetic level the water is dead.

Reverse osmosis treatment has the same issue as distillation although the RO process is quieter and less expensive to
run than distillation.

The 'Miracule' system is excellent but it is very expensive. In addition to cleansing the water it also provides powerful
Homeopathic advantages.

An interesting test was carried out on Homeopathy in Cuba where two million people were given a Homeopathic treatment
for a disease that is common in the rainy season. They proved beyond a doubt that Homeopathy works as hardly anybody
who had been treated as a preventative got the disease.
Bad Food

The fast food industry and cat / dog food industry have known for decades that if they remove minerals from food, the
body on a subconscious level says "that food was empty, I must have another one". The moment the minerals are back the
cravings end.

The cheese used in fast food burgers has been formulated to such a degree that they have manipulated the Cacine so
that it is as powerful from an addictive perspective as heroin.

Many people have left fast food out for months or years and it still looks the same. Bacteria and fungus won't attack it
because it's not real food. It simply won't decompose.

The problem with modern grains and carbohydrates is not to do with gluten so much but the fact that the farmers are
under so much pressure to produce the cheapest bread ingredients no matter what, that they are spraying Glyphosate
(Roundup) onto the crops about a week before harvest. This kills the wheat and forces the remaining nutrients into the seeds
- along with the toxic chemicals.

The modern grains are not healthy and are very addictive. It's not fat that makes you fat but carbs that make you fat.

Gluten is not really the problem. Our ancestors were not allergic to Gluten and so it is a new thing. It's not the Gluten but
what is being done to the wheat. The Gluten free thing is just a con and they have probably used some nasty method to get
rid of the Gluten - and so there is no guarantee that it is even going to help.

In bars they provide peanuts because they make you thirsty and so you drink more. In restaurants they give you bread
because they know it will give you a raging hunger. There is nothing good in the bread and so your stomach tells you that
you need more food.

Cut out the breads and the biscuits and the pies and the rice and pizza and the pasta for a while and see how your weight
responds.

Cancer

The Nobel prize was won by Otto Warburg in 1931 for showing the cause of cancer. He showed that if you take a normal
cell and deprive it of oxygen, it becomes cancerous. It changes from breathing oxygen (being aerobic) to utilising,
metabolising glucose (which is anaerobic).

Of course, this is not taught in medical school. Neither do they teach the revelations about Magnesium or Iodine - because
that wouldn't be good for business. Of course talking about reversing or curing cancer is illegal.

The average patient cost for Allelopathic (mainstream medicine) treatment is about $US300,000.

Everyone has cancerous cells in their body and cancer occurs in every person about 6 times in a lifetime. So in going to
get tested for cancer, there is a pretty good chance they will find it. But would you have died from it? Many people will have
had cancer a number of times and survived it without even knowing they had it.

Everything we have been told about cancer is wrong. Which is more clever? Your body that handles about 4,000
quadrillion actions each second, or a Doctor?

The Doctor tells you your body has gone wrong - "we know better than your body and we are going to override your
body's natural systems" effectively.

When your body develops a cancer, is it a bad thing or is it protecting you from something worse?

The Doctors, in saying they are going to remove a lump is like taking your car to the garage and the mechanic saying "we
have found the problem, it is a red light on the dashboard and we are going to remove the red warning light from the
dashboard". Now the cancer is cured?

They are assuming that the body did not know what it was doing. You might have some very dangerous toxins in your
body which could have come from vaccines, food, air etc. The body can't excrete them because they are modern chemicals
and the body has no pathways to get rid of them. What's it going to do?
 Well what would an Oyster do? If an Oyster has a grain of sand in it, so they say, it coats the grain of sand in a Pearl so
that its not an irritant anymore.

What if the body locks up the toxins in a tumour and parks it away somewhere. If you carry on taking on more and more
toxins, then that tumour is going to grow. If you get rid of the toxins that tumour will have a chance to shrink.

But the Doctors know better and they want to do a biopsy, which involves rupturing the tumour with a large needle. This is
madness, because this action spreads the very toxins that the body was trying to encapsulate. So the Doctor says "we have
to cut it out", and they give you poisonous drugs and irradiate you - everything will be fine.

The medical establishment have waged war on cancer - they have declared war on your body. This is NOT the way to
heal any body - to cut it, burn it, poison it - declare war on it.

You need to nurture your body back to becoming well again, and this is why detoxification is so incredibly important. You
have to assume that your body would not go wrong on you or let you down, it's doing the best it can in order to survive.

By putting the minerals, vitamins, essential fats and essential amino acids in (which are the sum total of what we need to
have perfect nutrition and therefore perfect health) you can love cancer away.

There may be people that say, oh but cancer can be caused by a virus, or a fungus or a bacteria and these observations
are also true. But to understand the nature of healthy you need to understand it from the cellular level.

Candida

Candida is a fungus and a fungus survives by consuming dead things. Without Candida you would be dead, we need it as
an integral part of our system. When the natural gut flora are damaged by toxins the Candida begin to take over and so
balance needs to be restored.

If you have too much Candida it is happening for a reason. A Doctor will say "you have too much Candida, lets knock it
out". But if you have a lot of Candid there must be a lot of dead stuff for it to eat, some inflammation is going on leading to
cell death. Also, if you are eating too much sugar or too many carbohydrates, processed foods; the Candida is going to be
having a field day and you are going to feel ill. There is a huge link between Candida and cancer.

A tell tale sign that you have too much Candida is if you have a white or yellow coating on your tounge.

There are many things that can cause Candida overgrowth - but they all mean you are toxic. It can be as simple as a
mercury filling. With mercury present, Candida levels can be 6 times normal and so it can be a sign of heavy metal
poisoning.

Candida overgrowth can also be caused by the body being low on minerals and vitamins and so your body's detox
pathways can't function properly. It can also be caused by a lack of exercise and sweating which is another way the body
gets toxins out. A lot of people are being poisoned because they are not getting enough exercise and their lymph system is
not moving.

Related: Everything You Need To Know About Candida Overgrowth

Health Restoration Packages

The reason Clive started a supplement company is that he had investigated the raw materials that most vitamin
companies were using and found that about 98% of these companies were using the cheapest ingredients, as opposed to
the best ingredients. The products that Clive sells are of the highest quality, which also makes his job easier as people don't
come back and complain.

Clive has formularised all of these supplements and in addition to many individual products, has two packages available
via his website www.ancientpurity.com. They are the 'Health In A Month Pack' and 'The Essentials Pack'.

Everyone who takes either of these packages will notice a difference in one month, more energy, clearer thinking, no
colds or flu. Once you remember what it is like to feel properly healthy again, you will be hooked!

With these combinations you are giving your body everything it needs to self-repair again. 'The Essentials Pack' is more
expensive as it contains more products.
About Ancient Purity

Ancient Purity was founded in England in 2010 following years of working in health and well-being. Our products are
supplied worldwide. Born out of their passion for natural health and wellbeing, we have researched and sourced the highest
quality organic Superfoods,

Supplements & Cutting Edge Health Products from around the world that will enable you to optimise your development and
regain your health. Ancient Purity products are sourced from the highest quality and most reliable producers in the world
today.

Purposely avoiding products that are deficient in active ingredients or containing GMOs like so many supplements available
on the market. We present natural, real health in superfood and super-nutrient form along with health technology that
encourages the body's healing capacity. It's your body that does the healing, supplements and devices simply provide the
correct fuel the body requires to make this possible.

We spend much of our time investigating the latest health discoveries as well as searching for the lost health secrets of the
past. Our goal is to educate and guide you to understand how to return to health or how to optimise it naturally and
effectively.

We aim to promote the use of natural health across the world as the first step to promoting health and recovering from a lack
of it. We pride ourselves on our reputation of providing a personal, friendly service and exceptional health products.
We hope you will join us in choosing to live a healthy, abundant, happy life and put your health first.

See: www.ancientpurity.com

The Top 10 Most Popular Natural Health Stories Of 2014

January 13 2015 | From: NaturalSociety

From Monsanto and GMOs to natural cures and research

2014 was an exciting year for the natural health movement, as millions continued to research everything from
alternative cures to the latest developments in the world of Monsanto and GMOs. As we venture into 2015, its
essential to look back at the top 10 most popular stories, which are also some of the most profoundly important.

10. Watch Out: Corporations Have Renamed High Fructose Corn Syrup

According to the Corn Refiners Association (CRA), theres been a sneaky name change. The term fructose is now being used
to denote a product that was previously known as HFCS-90, meaning it is 90 percent pure fructose. Compare this to what is
termed regular HFCS, which contains either 42 or 55 percent fructose, and you will know why General Mills is so eager to
keep you in the dark.
9. Turmeric Strikes at Root Cause of Cancerous Tumor Development, Study Finds

In the study Targeting cancer stem cells by curcumin and clinical applications, researchers looked at the various ways
curcumin could impact cancer stem cells and help to effectively treat various cancer.

8. FDA Approved: Paint Thinner in Childrens Cereals

Trisodium phosphate, otherwise known as trisodium orthophosphate, sodium phosphate, or TSP, is well known by
construction workers, DIYers, and developers, but not to most parents shopping for their morning meal. It is an inorganic
phosphate which can be detrimental to our health. It is often used in place of mineral spirits to remove paint!

7. Woman Fights for Sovereignty After Judge Declares Living Off Grid Illegal
A Florida woman has gone head to head with a local judge who has declared her efforts to live off the grid illegal and in
violation of local and international code ordinances.

6. Kelloggs Cereals: Double Dose of GMO Pesticides & Antibiotics

A consumer recently sent a box of Froot Loops to a lab for genetic testing and found that the corn and soy used in the cereal
are 100% RoundUp Ready GMO. So is the sugar. Never mind the other toxic ingredients in the cereal.

5. 4 Huge Reasons Why Soy Should be Avoided

Whether you call it soybeans or edamame, the bottom line is the same: soy should not be eaten by anyone pursuing good
health.

4. Monsanto Ordered to Pay $93 Million to Small Town for Poisoning Citizens

The West Virginia State Supreme Court finalized a big blow to the biotech giant Monsanto this month, finishing a settlement
causing Monsanto to pay $93 million to the tiny town of Nitro, West Virginia for poisoning citizens with Agent Orange
chemicals.

3. Compound in Celery Found to Destroy 86% of Lung Cancer Cells

Celery has been found to be extremely effective at killing ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, breast, liver, and lung cancer cells. In
fact, in a recent study, celery killed up to 86% of cancer cells in the lungs (in vitro).

2. Government Labels those who Grow their Own Food Extremists

An extremist is a person who advocates the use of force or violence; advocates supremacist causes based on race,
ethnicity, religion, gender, or national origin; or otherwise engages to illegally deprive individuals or groups of their civil rights.

1. Big Win! Monsanto Reports $156 Million Loss in Q4 as Farmers Abandon GM Crops
For the quarter ending Aug. 31, Monsanto reported a loss of $156 million, or 31 cents per share, compared with a loss of $249
million, or 47 cents per share, in the same period last year.

2014 was a year full of victory, disturbing news, and amazing findings in the world of natural health. Already, its easy
to see that 2015 will be even more interesting and eventful.

Please share this natural health year in review with friends and family in order to help bring them up to speed on the
world of natural health and healing!

Roundup Causes Autism Says Top MIT Scientist

January 11 2015 | From: ANH-USA / JonRappoport

Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025, Warns Senior Research Scientist at MIT.

Why? Evidence points to glyphosate toxicity from the overuse of Monsantos Roundup herbicide on our food.

Also See: Heavy Use Of Herbicide Roundup Linked To Health Dangers - U.S. Study

For over three decades, Stephanie Seneff, PhD, has researched biology and technology, over the years publishing over 170
scholarly peer-reviewed articles. In recent years she has concentrated on the relationship between nutrition and health,
tackling such topics as Alzheimers, autism, and cardiovascular diseases, as well as the impact of nutritional deficiencies and
environmental toxins on human health.

At a conference last Thursday, in a special panel discussion about GMOs, she took the audience by surprise when she
declared, At todays rate, by 2025, one in two children will be autistic. She noted that the side effects of autism closely
mimic those of glyphosate toxicity, and presented data showing a remarkably consistent correlation between the use of
Roundup on crops (and the creation of Roundup-ready GMO crop seeds) with rising rates of autism. Children with autism have
biomarkers indicative of excessive glyphosate, including zinc and iron deficiency, low serum sulfate, seizures, and
mitochondrial disorder.
A fellow panelist reported that after Dr. Seneffs presentation, All of the 70 or so people in attendance were squirming, likely
because they now had serious misgivings about serving their kids, or themselves, anything with corn or soy, which are nearly
all genetically modified and thus tainted with Roundup and its glyphosate.

Dr. Seneff noted the ubiquity of glyphosates use. Because it is used on corn and soy, all soft drinks and candies sweetened
with corn syrup and all chips and cereals that contain soy fillers have small amounts of glyphosate in them, as do our beef and
poultry since cattle and chicken are fed GMO corn or soy.

Wheat is often sprayed with Roundup just prior to being harvested, which means that all non-organic bread and wheat
products would also be sources of glyphosate toxicity. The amount of glyphosate in each product may not be large, but the
cumulative effect (especially with as much processed food as Americans eat) could be devastating. A recent study shows that
pregnant women living near farms where pesticides are applied have a 60% increased risk of children having an autism
spectrum disorder.

Other toxic substances may also be autism-inducing. You may recall our story on the CDC whistleblower who revealed the
governments deliberate concealment of the link between the MMR vaccine (for measles, mumps, and rubella) and a sharply
increased risk of autism, particularly in African American boys. Other studies now show a link between childrens exposure to
pesticides and autism.

Children who live in homes with vinyl floors, which can emit phthalate chemicals, are more likely to have autism. Children
whose mothers smoked were also twice as likely to have autism. Research now acknowledges that environmental
contaminants such as PCBs, PBDEs, and mercury can alter brain neuron functioning even before a child is born.

This month, the USDA released a study finding that although there were detectable levels of pesticide residue in more than
half of food tested by the agency, 99% of samples taken were found to be within levels the government deems safe, and 40%
were found to have no detectable trace of pesticides at all. The USDA added, however, that due to cost concerns, it did not
test for residues of glyphosate.

Lets repeat that: they never tested for the active ingredient in the most widely used herbicide in the world.

Cost concerns? How absurdunless they mean it will cost them too much in terms of the special relationship between the
USDA and Monsanto. You may recall the revolving door between Monsanto and the federal government, with agency officials
becoming high-paying executivesand vice versa! Money, power, prestige: its all there. Monsanto and the USDA love to
scratch each others backs. Clearly this omission was purposeful.
In addition, as we have previously reported, the number of adverse reactions from vaccines can be correlated as well with
autism, though Seneff says it doesnt correlate quite as closely as with Roundup. The same correlations between applications
of glyphosate and autism show up in deaths from senility.

Of course, autism is a complex problem with many potential causes. Dr. Seneffs data, however, is particularly important
considering how close the correlation isand because it is coming from a scientist with impeccable credentials. Earlier this
year, she spoke at the Autism One conference and presented many of the same facts; that presentation is available on
YouTube.

Monsanto claims that Roundup is harmless to humans. Bacteria, fungi, algae, parasites, and plants use a seven-step
metabolic route known as the shikimate pathway for the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids; glyphosate inhibits this
pathway, causing the plant to die, which is why its so effective as an herbicide. Monsanto says humans dont have this
shikimate pathway, so its perfectly safe.

Dr. Seneff points out, however, that our gut bacteria do have this pathway, and thats crucial because these bacteria supply
our body with crucial amino acids. Roundup thus kills beneficial gut bacteria, allowing pathogens to grow; interferes with the
synthesis of amino acids including methionine, which leads to shortages in critical neurotransmitters and folate; chelates
(removes) important minerals like iron, cobalt and manganese; and much more.

Even worse, she notes, additional chemicals in Roundup are untested because theyre classified asinert,yet according to a
2014 study in BioMed Research International, these chemicals are capable of amplifying the toxic effects of Roundup
hundreds of times over.

Glyphosate is present in unusually high quantities in the breast milk of American mothers, at anywhere from 760 to 1,600
times the allowable limits in European drinking water. Urine testing shows Americans have ten times the glyphosate
accumulation as Europeans.

In my view, the situation is almost beyond repair, Dr. Seneff said after her presentation. We need to do something
drastic.

Boycott, Ban, Criminalize Roundup

Glyphosate is the primary active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup.

There is no official figure for the amount of glyphosate used every year in the world. One estimate? 650,000 tonnes, which
works out to a staggering 1.3 billion pounds.

Manufactured by Monsanto and a number of other companies, glyphosate use spiked after the introduction of Monsantos
GMO Roundup Ready food crops in the 1990s.

Here is a sprinkle of information about glyphosate. To say its sobering is a vast understatement. Keep in mind that the
medical cartel, which would call a mothers touch a disease if it could get away with it, has no name for any disease or disorder
caused by glyphosate. In other words, the cartel doesnt acknowledge its existence.

One: Scientific American, June 23, 2009, Weed-whacking herbicide proves deadly to human cells, by Crystal
Gammon:

Glyphosate, Roundups active ingredient, is the most widely used herbicide in the United States. About 100 million
pounds are applied to U.S. farms and lawns every year, according to the EPA."

Until now, most health studies have focused on the safety of glyphosate, rather than the mixture of ingredients
found in Roundup. But in the new study, scientists found that Roundups inert ingredients amplified the toxic effect
on human cellseven at concentrations much more diluted than those used on farms and lawns."

One specific inert ingredient, polyethoxylated tallowamine, or POEA, was more deadly to human embryonic,
placental and umbilical cord cells than the herbicide itself a finding the researchers call astonishing.

This clearly confirms that the [inert ingredients] in Roundup formulations are not inert, wrote the study authors from
Frances University of Caen. Moreover, the proprietary mixtures available on the market could cause cell damage
and even death [at the] residual levels found on Roundup-treated crops, such as soybeans, alfalfa and corn, or
lawns and gardens.

Two: Reuters, 4/25/13, Heavy use of herbicide Roundup linked to health dangersUS study, by Corey Gillam:

Heavy use of the worlds most popular herbicide, Roundup, could be linked to a range of health problems and
diseases, including Parkinsons, infertility and cancers", according to a new study.

The peer-reviewed report, published last week in the scientific journal Entropy, said evidence indicates that
residues of glyphosate, the chief ingredient in Roundup weed killer, which is sprayed over millions of acres of
crops, has been found in food".

"Those residues enhance the damaging effects of other food-borne chemical residues and toxins in the
environment to disrupt normal body functions and induce disease, according to the report, authored by Stephanie
Seneff, a research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Anthony Samsel, a retired science
consultant from Arthur D. Little, Inc. Samsel is a former private environmental government contractor as well as a
member of the Union of Concerned Scientists."

Negative impact on the body is insidious and manifests slowly over time as inflammation damages cellular
systems throughout the body, the study says.

Of the more than two dozen top herbicides on the market, glyphosate is the most popular. In 2007, as much as 185
million pounds of glyphosate was used by U.S. farmers, double the amount used six years ago, according to
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data.
Three: A study: An acute exposure to glyphosate-based herbicide alters aromatase levels in in testis and sperm
nuclear quality; Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, v.38. Issue 1, July 2014:

We investigated the effects of a glyphosate-based herbicide after an 8-day exposure of adult rats These results
suggest changes in androgen/estrogen balance and in sperm nuclear quality The repetition of exposures of this
herbicide could alter the mammalian reproduction.

Four: Truthout, Oct. 6, 2014, Monsantos Roundup linked to cancer, by Jeff Ritterman, MD:

Roundup is now heavily sprayed in what is known as the Soy Republic, an area of Latin America larger than the
state of California. This region has undergone a profound transformation since genetically modified (GM) crops
were first introduced in 1996. Some 125 million acres in Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Uruguay, and Paraguay are now
devoted to GM soy production."

Dr. Medardo Avila Vazquez, a pediatrician specializing in environmental health, explained his concerns:

The change in how agriculture is produced has brought, frankly, a change in the profile of diseases. Weve gone
from a pretty healthy population to one with a high rate of cancer, birth defects, and illnesses seldom seen before.
What we have complained about for years was confirmed and especially what doctors say about the sprayed towns
and areas affected by industrial agriculture. Cancer cases are multiplying as never before in areas with massive use
of pesticides."

Much the same was found in Chaco, Argentinas poorest province. In 2012, two villages were compared, the
heavily sprayed farming village of Avia Terai and the non-sprayed ranching village of Charadai. In the farming
village, 31 percent of residents had a family member with cancer while only 3 percent of residents in the ranching
village had one.

Five: Rense.com, 8/5/2005, Monsantos Roundup Killing Frogs, Amphibians Worldwide:

The most striking result from the experiments was that a chemical designed to kill plants killed 98 percent of all
tadpoles within three weeks and 79 percent of all frogs within one day - University of Pittsburgh researcher, Rick
Relyea

Six: Global Research, July 5, 2014, Monsantos Roundup herbicide and regulators with something to hide, by
Colin Todhunter:

Last year, Friends of the Earth (FoE) and GM Freeze commissioned a study based on urine samples from
volunteers in 18 countries across Europe. It found that on average 44 percent of samples contained glyphosate.
The proportion of positive samples varied between countries, with Malta, Germany,the UK and Poland having the
most positive tests, and lower levels detected in Macedonia and Switzerland. All the volunteers who provided
samples lived in cities, and none had handled or used glyphosate products in the run-up to the tests.
 In Mississippi, 75 percent of air and rain sample contained levels of glyphosate that could have serious
physiological consequences for humans.

Claire Robinson from GM Watch notes that earlier this year a group of Chinese food safety volunteers submitted a
request to Chinas Ministry of Agriculture to disclose the study that justified issuing the safety certificate for the
import into China of Monsantos Roundup. Writing on the GM Watch website, she says:

The Ministry replied that Roundup was registered in China in 1988 based on a toxicology test report issued by a
testing company called Younger Laboratories in St Louis, Missouri. The test was an acute exposure toxicity test
(such tests last a maximum of a few days), with Roundup being given to rats by mouth and applied to the skin of
rabbits. It claimed to find no effect on the eyes or skin, and no allergy.

The volunteers asked the Ministry to release the study, and the Ministry in turn asked Monsanto. Monsanto replied
that the study constituted its own commercial secret, adding that the company had never disclosed the study
anywhere in the world and did not agree to disclose it now. The volunteers are appealing against the decision.

One of the implications of these six citations: Glyphosate, as an ingredient of Roundup and other herbicides, drifts on the wind,
and its dangerous effects are felt far from agriculture centers.

As long as Monsanto is permitted to produce GMO seeds that are engineered to be immune to Roundup, the tonnage of
glyphosate loosed on the world population will continue to escalate.

Properly thought of, glyphosate is a chemical-warfare agent.

The labeling of GMOs, as a response to the threat, is too little, too late. It would be akin to requiring enemy planes, loaded with
bombs, to display an insignia of the countrys air force as it invades.

Ten Reasons Why You Shouldn't Vaccinate Your Children

January 6 2015 | From: NaturalNews

Vaccinating a child or not is an important decision that every parent must make. But not all parents
understand the true risks involved, risks that could leave a child debilitated for life, or even kill him.
The pro-vaccine mafia is quick to sweep all cases of vaccine-related injury and death under the rug as extremely rare
anomalies, but many a parent of a vaccine-injured child will be the first to tell you that, if she could do it all over
again, she wouldn't have let her kid get jabbed.

AIf your doctor, your child's school administrator, or a friend or family member is pressuring you to inject your child with
genetically modified (GM) viruses, heavy metals and preservatives, and you're not sure how to make the best and most
informed choice in the matter -- or even how to respond back to these people intelligently in order to shut them up -- consider
the following 10 reasons not to go the vaccination route[1]:

1) Vaccines don't work.

When printed on a poster or repeated ad nauseam by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the embedded
claim that vaccines prevent communicable disease and impart lasting immunity might sound nice to the low-information
masses. But the science simply doesn't reinforce it, with outbreak after outbreak proving that vaccinated people are the most
immunocompromised, and are always the ones contracting the diseases against which they were vaccinated.

Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych addresses this and many other vaccine facts in her powerful book Vaccine Illusion, which destroys
many modern myths surrounding vaccination. Not only do vaccines not impart lasting immunity, but they actually destroy the
body's natural immune capacity, leaving many vaccinated individuals immuno-debilitated throughout their lives.[2]

2) Vaccines have never been proven safe or effective.

Every single study used as "evidence" that vaccines are safe erroneously compares side effects from one vaccine to side
effects from another vaccine, effectively canceling them out. None of them compare the health outcomes of vaccinated
versus unvaccinated individuals, which would be the true test of vaccine safety.

"True, scientific, double-blind placebo studies have never been conducted on vaccines to determine their
safety," explains VacTruth.com.
3) The first vaccine was a complete failure, which the industry tried to cover up.

Little do most people know that the first vaccine ever produced, for smallpox, was a complete disaster. The health
consequences in those who received it included syphilis and death, though a concerted effort was made at the time to cover
up these outcomes and push vaccines anyway because they're highly profitable.[3]

4) Vaccines are highly profitable for drug companies, which aren't held liable for damages.

Let's face it -- vaccines are a major cash cow for the drug industry. Not only are vaccine companies completely shielded
from liability when their vaccines injure or kill children, but they are typically "sponsored" by government agencies that push
them on families and children using outrageous and unfounded scare tactics.[4]

5) All vaccines contain deadly chemical additives.

The average pediatrician would be hard-pressed to provide package inserts outlining vaccine ingredients to their clients prior
to pushing vaccines. But parents need to know that all vaccines contain deadly, neurodamaging chemicals like
aluminum, mercury and formaldehyde. Many vaccines are also loaded with monosodium glutamate (MSG), antibiotics
and even genetically modified organisms (GMOs).[5]

6) Unvaccinated children are generally healthier.

International studies looking at the health outcomes of unvaccinated children compared to their vaccinated peers have
repeatedly shown that the unjabbed are generally less afflicted with allergies, autism, behavioral disorders, autoimmune
dysfunction and respiratory ailments.

Concerning the flu vaccine, for instance, a study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases found that individuals
jabbed for influenza are 550 percent more likely to have respiratory problems.[6]

7) Vaccines cause lifelong, incurable diseases in some children.

It's one thing to have localized swelling or temporary fever symptoms following vaccinations. But if your child is one of the
unfortunate ones who develops permanent nerve damage in the form of Guillain-Barre Syndrome, for instance, he or she
could require lifelong care and treatment for vaccine damage. If you choose to vaccinate, are you prepared to potentially
have to reorient your life in the event of autism or brain damage?[7]

8) Vaccines kill children and adults.

Though young children and babies are most prone to incurring permanent harm from vaccines, adults are also at risk. One
prevalent example of this is the infamous Gardasil vaccine for HPV, which to date has injured and killed tens of thousands of
adolescents and teenagers.[8]

"US children are given far more vaccines at younger ages compared to other countries," explains VacTruth.com, noting that
vaccines are also linked to the fatal condition SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), which the medical establishment blames
on genetics or child abuse in order to protect the vaccine sham.

9) Vaccine companies can't be sued if you or your child is harmed by vaccines.

If vaccines really are as safe as the jab-pushers constantly claim they are, then why was the National Childhood Vaccine Injury
Act passed in 1986, exempting vaccine and drug companies, as well as health practitioners, from liability in the event of injury
or death?

In 2011, the Supreme Court affirmed that injured parties can't sue vaccine companies for injury or death related to vaccines
[9]. Is this really a risk that you want to take with your child?

10) Natural exposure to disease is the best vaccine.

Truth be told, the only way to truly develop vibrant, lifelong immunity is to live your life as you normally would, but without
injecting dead (and in some cases live) viruses and chemical adjuvants into your muscle tissue.
Natural exposure to whatever diseases are lurking in the world is the only way for the body to develop permanent antibodies
that will forever protect against disease.[10] Eating fresh, nutrient-dense organic food and living a healthy lifestyle also helps
boost your immune system, allowing you to overcome and develop resistance to diseases naturally.
For a more thorough explanation of vaccination versus natural immunity, visit: Sites.Google.com.

Sources:

[1] http://vactruth.com

[2] http://www.naturalnews.com

[3] http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org

[4] http://www.nvic.org

[5] http://vaxtruth.org

[6] http://healthimpactnews.com

[7] http://www.nvic.org

[8] http://sanevax.org

[9] http://www.csmonitor.com

[10] https://sites.google.com

Cures, Health & Wellbeing

Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/health-wellbeing-3.shtml

The Science Is Conclusive: Mobile Phones Cause Cancer

December 30 2014 | From: NaturalNews

They say there's only two things constant in this life: death and taxes. But a third viable
contender might be cancer, which an extensive cohort of scientific research has found is caused
by prolonged exposure to radiation from cell phones and their associated communication towers.

Also See: Forbes: Study Suggests Wi-Fi Exposure More Dangerous To Kids Than Previously Thought

Contrary to what you may have heard in the mainstream news, mobile phones and the antennas that allow them to
communicate emit powerful, microwave radio frequencies capable of penetrating our bodies and cells. And
constant exposure to these frequencies, according to the science, appears to be one of the leading causes of
cancer in the modern age.

Wireless phone radiation can lead to brain cancer

Extensive research into the connection between cell phone radiation and cancer has linked this ubiquitous modern
technology to two main types of brain tumors: gliomas and acoustic neuromas. Information compiled by the
ElectricSense.com has confirmed the following findings with regard to cell phones and brain cancer.

1) An independent study commissioned by U.S. wireless carrier T-Mobile found that cell phone radiation directly initiates
and promotes the formation of cancer:
HESE-Project.org.[PDF]

2) The renowned Interphone study also found that regular cell phone use at just 30 minutes per day over 10 years
increases the risk of gliomas by 40 percent. It also found that tumors were more likely to form on the side of the head
where a cell phone is most prominently held:
BioInitiative.org.[PDF]

3) A review of 23 epidemiological studies conducted by seven scientists concluded that cell phones cause a "harmful
association" between cell phones and cancer. The only included studies that didn't suggest this were "lower quality" ones
that researchers say "failed to meet scientific best practices" -- these studies were all funded by the mobile phone industry:
NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov;
SFGate.com.

4) Researchers from the Hardell Research Group, which is noted for conducting what many consider to be the highest-
quality studies on the subject, found a "consistent pattern" of increased risks for both glioma and acoustic neuroma in
conjunction with mobile phone use:
PathophysiologyJournal.com.

5) A study out of France observed similar outcomes associated with prolonged exposure to electromagnetic frequencies
from mobile phones. Scientists noted higher rates of gliomas and temporal tumors from "occupational and urban mobile
phone use." In response, the EMF watchdog group Powerwatch noted that this study supports the categorization of mobile
phone radiation as a "probable human carcinogen."
OEM.BMJ.com;
Powerwatch.org.uk.

6) A study of nearly 800,000 middle-aged UK women found that those who used cell phones for 10 years or more had a
250 percent increased risk of developing an acoustic neuroma. The longer the women used the phones, the higher their
risk:
SaferEMR.com.

7) Similarly, a study conducted by the group Lonn found that acoustic neuromas are increasingly more likely to develop the
longer a person uses a mobile phone:
NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov.

8) In Sweden, researchers studying adult brain tumor cases found that individuals with the highest cumulative use of
mobile phones also had the highest risk of developing brain cancer:
NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov.

9) The Hardell group conducted a study in 2009 which found that RF-EMFs from mobile and cordless phones are directly
associated with malignant brain tumors. This study specifically states that wireless radiation initiates and promotes
carcinogenesis:
NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov.

Wireless phone radiation also triggers pituitary, thyroid, stem cell, oral, parotid, lymph node,
breast, blood, prostate and eye cancers

1) The body's "master" gland, also known as the pituitary gland, is responsible for producing hormones and regulating
other key bodily systems. But a study out of France found that cell phone use greatly increases the risk that this important
gland will become cancerous:
MieuxPrevenir.Blogspot.fr.

2) The thyroid gland, which similarly produces hormones in addition to regulating body temperature, is also affected by
mobile phone radiation. An Israeli study found that rates of cell phone use are directly proportional to the risk of developing
thyroid gland cancer:
SaferEMR.com.

3) Many health experts would contend that solar radiation poses the greatest threat to healthy skin. But a study out of
Sweden found that melanoma risk is greatly accelerated by mobile phone use:
HIR.nu.

4) A controversial Powerwatch study found that cell phone use nearly triples the risk of neuroepithelial tumors, which are a
result of stem cell cancer:
Powerwatch.org.uk.

5) Another study out of Israel confirmed a direct association between cell phone use and cancers of the mouth. Based on
460 cases of parotid gland tumors, researchers observed a direct association between mobile phone radiation and cancers
of the parotid, the salivary gland located right next to where users typically hold their phones:
AJE.OxfordJournals.org.

6) A separate study, also out of Israel, found that parotid gland cancers have increased in prevalence by 400 percent in the
country between 1970 and 2006, which scientists link to increased mobile phone use:
Journals.LWW.com.
7) An extensive review of more than 12 separate studies looking at health outcomes from exposure to radiation from
mobile phone, television and radio broadcast towers found that cancers in general, and specifically cancers of the brain
and blood (leukemia), are greatly increased:
Journals.LWW.com.

8) Lymph nodes, a key component of the immune system, don't like cell phone radiation much, either. An Australian study
found that typical exposure to cell phone radiation greatly increases lymphoma risk:
MicrowaveNews.com.[PDF]

9) Back in the U.S., a study looking at young women with breast cancer found that regular use of smartphones can trigger
the formation of breast cancer. This is especially true when women carry their phones in their blouses or bras, where
phones are pressed directly against the breasts.
Hindawi.com.

10) Researchers in Germany have also linked mobile phone radiation to uveal melanoma and other cancers of the eye:
NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov.

11) Practically every other type of cancer not covered by one of the aforementioned studies was identified in a large-scale
Brazilian study, which linked mobile phone radiation to cancers of the prostate, breasts, lungs, kidneys and liver.
Shockingly, more than 80 percent of identified deaths in Brazil's third largest city, Belo Horizonte, occurred less than 500
meters away from one of the city's 300 cell phone antennas:
WhyFry.org.

Researchers Lie About Plastic Being Safe

December 28 2014 | From: DrVikkiPetersen

A new expos reveals that plastic of all types is creating disease, especially in our youth. Research
studies are skewed. Find out the truth.
Got little ones? Here are ideas of what to use instead of plastic sippy cups.

www.healthnowmedical.com

Mammograms Cause Breast Cancer

December 12 2014 | From: TheContrail

Doctors break their code of silence on arguably one of the biggest of all of the frauds in medicine:
mammography

Below the video are some links to information on an alternative to Mammography, Breast Thermography.

Additional links

Breast Thermography and Early Breast Cancer Detection

www.breastthermography.com

The Termography Center of Oregon

www.hillsboronaturalmedicine.com
Links to qualified Thermography Centers in US

www.iact-org.org

Addiction To Junk Food: More Than Meets The Eye

December 11 2014 | From: GreenMedInfo

When it comes to processed food, excessive amounts of sugar and hydrogenated fats is the rule
rather than the exception. It is no secret anymore that there is a very distinct thread linking the
increased consumption of such foods, coupled with relentless advertising campaigns and the
epidemic proportions of diabetes and obesity in all age groups on a global scale.

In fact, if current trends continue, it is estimated that by 2030, more than 86% of Americans will be either overweight
or obese. For some people, this picture looks dreadful enough already, but the truth is that it barely scratches the
surface of the problem.

Neurobiology research has shown that food can cause serious addiction, the kind that addictive drugs do. Dr Nicole Avena
and her colleagues from the department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, report that the consumption of sugar not only
alters brain function and behavior, but it also elicits the same type of withdrawal symptoms like opiate drugs do.

In other words, sugar affects the opioid receptors in the brain, which are recognized by natural (endogenous or not) opioid
substances. On the other hand, foods rich in fat seem to affect the brain in a different way, although they cause withdrawal-
type symptoms as well. Many studies show that there is a unique relationship between emotional balance and fatty acids.

For example, a study published in The Journal of Clinical Investigation in 2011 tested the effects of fat consumption in healthy
people while experiencing experimentally induced sad feelings. Within minutes the sad feelings were significantly alleviated
and the subjects reported improved mood, while MRI scans confirmed the expected brain response.

This study is important because it shows that fat actually does not even have to be properly digested in order to modify brain
functions. The mere presence of fat in the gut triggers the release of gastrointestinal hormones, which regulate neurological
and emotional responses within very few minutes.

The above studies prove that junk food, high in fat and sugar, is so much more than excessive calories. It truly creates
addiction on a biochemical and neurological level. It would be naive to believe that the richness of junk food in these specific
compounds is an accident. Michael Moss explains in his incredible book "Salt, Sugar, Fat: How the Food Giants Hooked Us"
that the amount of secretive research invested by Big Food giants in finding the right combinations of the cheapest and most
addictive ingredients for their products, is tremendous.

What neuroscience is only now starting to understand and elucidate, food companies knew it all along. And they have
capitalized hard on it by selling processed food especially designed to bypass appetite control and neurological security valves
of any unsuspected victim.

Due to the complexity and interconnectedness of the biological functions in the human body, the overall impact of processed
food on human physiology, health, life expectancy and quality of life in this generation is still hard to estimate.

But again the full extent of this slow, but efficient, genocide cannot be not fully appreciated if the impact on the future
generations is not assessed as well. Latest research shows that the diet during pregnancy has a significant impact on the
nutritional choices of the offspring.

It is now confirmed that when the expectant mother follows a high-fat diet, her baby shows a measurable preference for sugar.
However, this is not just a behavioral trait casually passed on to the next generation by means of mimicking the behavior of
adults. On the contrary, as a result of the maternal diet, the DNA and subsequent expression of genes encoding opioid and
dopamine receptors in the brain of the child is altered in a manner that promotes addiction.

New Zealand Public Health: The Silent Crisis

December 10 2014 | From: Werewolf

How the public health system is being driven into the ground. New Zealands public health system
has been in crisis for so long that its failings and deteriorating performance vis a vis other
developed countries now tend to be treated as its normal mode of being.
Unmet needs are rife. In 2013, a major survey of the health systems unmet needs reported that some 170,000 Kiwis
are being turned down every year from getting onto public health waiting lists. While 280,000 Kiwis a year met the
clinical threshold for elective surgery, only 110,000 were being placed on the waiting list.

To function at all, the public health system has become increasingly reliant on internationally trained medical graduates (IMGs)
to cope with senior doctor shortages, while also proving increasingly unable to retain them here. (New Zealands dependency
on IMGs to meet its health needs is the highest in the OECD.)

As the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists (ASMS) pointed out in a major report released in August, overseas trained
senior doctors had comprised 35% of the public health workforce in 2000 (already a high proportion by international standards)
and this has risen to 42%, on 2012 figures.

Even so, these foreign doctors and specialists are leaving at an accelerating rate apparently in response to the toxic
combination of high clinical workloads, relatively poor wages and conditions, and chronic delays in the provision of essential
equipment. Judging by the ASMS figures, of those IMGs who first registered in 2011, nearly 40% were no longer practising in
New Zealand one year later, which is more than double the percentage loss of five years earlier.

Much of the disturbing trends charted in the ASMS report and more on them later are a reflection of the funding shortages
imposed by central government through the DHB system, under both Labour-led and National-led governments. The current
shortages are also a reflection of the current governments ideologically-driven goal of getting the books into surplus, come
what may.

The result is a DHB managerial culture that places a high value on short-term cost-cutting and the deferral of investment with
a reluctance to plan long term, despite the efficiencies this could deliver.

There are few signs of improvement on the horizon. Quite the contrary. The staffing levels in New Zealands public health
system are set to deteriorate, via a vis Australia. To take just one example : Australia is on track to meet its target of 1.5
specialists per 1,000 people by 2021. As the ASMS report indicates (p.31) to do likewise in New Zealand would require a net
increase of 300 specialists a year, or roughly 80 a year above what New Zealand has managed over the past three years.

Unless the current growth rate improves significantly, New Zealands total (public and private) specialist workforce target for
2021 will fall short by a headcount of approximately 560 specialists. While the ambit and precision of some of these figures
are still in dispute, the ASMS confirmed to Werewolf that the specialist workforce in the DHB system is currently running at
around 100 a year below what would be needed to reach parity with Australia by 2021.
One reason why the state of public health is not a bigger political issue is that an informal level of bi-partisan agreement exists
between National and Labour about some of the public health systems worst features. For example : the current six month
waiting list system implemented by the Clark government, and tightened under National is a major reason for the levels of
unmet need.

Getting sick people onto the waiting list forces everyone (patients, GPs and specialists alike) to game the system and
exaggerate the symptoms, in order to ascend the priority ladder and gain access to treatment. Routinely, the old and the sick
are being forced into competition with each other, in a bid for attention.

The other reasons why the state of the public health system is rarely in the headlines is due to (a) the professionalism of
healthcare staff and (b) the internalisation by the public of the view that their public hospitals are chronically in crisis, so they
shouldnt ask for very much. As the ASMS report concludes, health professionals can be their own worst enemies in that
respect :

"While the consequences of senior medical officer (SMO) shortages are far reaching, they go largely unnoticed
by the public, in part because the shortages are so entrenched.

They have become the norm in many areas. Incursion of clinical workloads into important non-clinical [teaching
and training] time has become an accepted and unavoidable fact of life for many SMOs.

This, and the high use of locums [a short-term and significantly more expensive fix] to fill service gaps temporarily,
have saved many services from becoming dysfunctional have largely kept the negative effects of shortages out of
the newspapers.

Ignoring the issue, however, simply means the issue grows and the consequences become more severe further
down the track."

Signs of the underlying malaise do occasionally become apparent. Every now and then, highly trained and capable clinicians
will throw up their hands and leave New Zealand, generating newspaper headlines such as Top Specialist Quits in Disgust.

In mid-November, one such departure highlighted some of the issues behind the negative trends. Wellington Hospital lost its
leading cardio-electrophysiologist, Dr Alejandro Jimenez Restrepo. Born in Colombia and trained in the US, Jimenez had
arrived here in 2012 with his wife and young family, intending to settle permanently in New Zealand.

Within two and a half years, he was gone. In late November, Werewolf contacted Jimenez at his new post in Abu Dhabi, to
discuss the reasons for his departure.

Read the full story at: Werewolf

Parents Of Kapiti Coast Boy With Tumour Want Wi-Fi Out Of School
December 9 2014 | From: Stuff

A Kapiti Coast school is surveying parents about plans for classroom wi-fi after a young pupil died
from brain cancer.
The parents of Ethan Wyman, who died 11 months after being diagnosed with two brain tumours, want wi-fi removed
from classrooms at Te Horo School. [This story was also reported in a related article].

The board of trustees has now sent out a survey to all parents, after the Wymans expressed fears that the radiation effect of
wi-fi could be linked to cancer.

But the Ministry of Education, which has been at community meetings held by the school alongside the Ministry of Health, says
research shows wi-fi is safe. Damon Wyman, who still has two children at the school, says Ethan was diagnosed with the
tumours four months after he was given a wi-fi-connected iPod.

His parents later discovered he had been falling asleep with it under his pillow. Even though it was on standby, it was still
emitting bursts of radiation as it tried to connect to the router, Mr Wyman said.

Doctors who saw Ethan said the tumours appeared to be about three months old, Mr Wyman said. He died, aged 10, less than
a year after diagnosis last August.

"We're not saying that caused it, but it seems like a bit of a coincidence. Most people would be very cautious about
giving their 5-year-old a cellphone - well, this is 30 kids in a classroom [being exposed] to the same thing."

Research showed it was worth taking a precautionary approach to wi-fi. A group of parents had offered to fund cable internet
as an alternative.

"To me it's a no- brainer, but as we'd be the first school in New Zealand to remove wi-fi, it's a big deal for the
board."

Board chairman Steve Joss said the school was taking concerns seriously. "The board hasn't made any decisions on what to
do, we're just working through the process of getting information."
The survey was delivered yesterday, and a decision would be made on December 28.

Ministry deputy secretary for education Andrew Hampton said it was working with the school to give information about wi-fi.

The Ministry of Health recently restated its position that exposure to electromagnetic fields from wi- fi equipment in schools did
not pose a health risk, he said.

"The health and safety of children in our schools is critical, and the ministry will continue to work with the Ministry of
Health to monitor New Zealand standards, international standards and credible research on wi-fi and radio
frequency electromagnetic fields."

Although the ministry offered schools a wireless network option, it was up to boards whether they took it up.

Electromagnetic fields consultant Martin Gledhill said exposures to radio frequency fields from wi- fi gear were low, at just a
tiny fraction of the public exposure limit.

The Real Reason Wheat Is Toxic (It's Not GMO, Gluten Or Hybridisation)
November 21 2014 | From: TheHealthyHomeEconomist

The stories became far too frequent to ignore. Emails from folks with allergic or digestive issues to
wheat experienced no symptoms whatsoever when they tried eating pasta on vacation in Italy.

Confused parents wondering why wheat consumption sometimes triggered autoimmune reactions in their children
but not at other times.
In my own home, Ive long pondered why my husband can eat the wheat I prepare at home, but he experiences negative
digestive effects eating even a single roll in a restaurant.

There is clearly something going on with wheat that is not well known by the general public. It goes far and beyond organic
versus nonorganic, gluten or hybridisation because even conventional wheat triggers no symptoms for some who eat wheat in
other parts of the world.

What indeed is going on with wheat?

For quite some time, I secretly harbored the notion that wheat in the United States must, in fact, be genetically modified. GMO
wheat secretly invading the North American food supply seemed the only thing that made sense and could account for the
varied experiences I was hearing about.

I reasoned that it couldnt be the gluten or wheat hybridisation. Gluten and wheat hybrids have been consumed for thousands
of years. It just didnt make sense that this could be the reason for so many people suddenly having problems with wheat and
gluten in general in the past 5-10 years.

Finally, the answer came over dinner a couple of months ago with a friend who was well versed in the wheat production
process. I started researching the issue for myself, and was, quite frankly, horrified at what I discovered.

The good news is that the reason wheat has become so toxic in the United States is not because it is secretly GMO as I had
feared (thank goodness!). The bad news is that the problem lies with the manner in which wheat is grown and harvested by
conventional wheat farmers.

Youre going to want to sit down for this one. Ive had some folks burst into tears in horror when I passed along this information
before.

Common wheat harvest protocol in [not just] the United States is to drench the wheat fields
with Roundup several days before the combine harvesters work through the fields as the
practice allows for an earlier, easier and bigger harvest.

Pre-harvest application of the herbicide Roundup or other herbicides containing the deadly active ingredient glyphosate to
wheat and barley as a desiccant was suggested as early as 1980. It has since become routine over the past 15 years and is
used as a drying agent 7-10 days before harvest within the conventional farming community.USDA pesticides applied to wheat

According to Dr. Stephanie Seneff of MIT who has studied the issue in depth and who I recently saw present on the subject at
a nutritional Conference in Indianapolis, desiccating non-organic wheat crops with glyphosate just before harvest came into
vogue late in the 1990's with the result that most of the non-organic wheat in the United States is now contaminated with it.
Seneff explains that when you expose wheat to a toxic chemical like glyphosate, it actually releases more seeds
resulting in a slightly greater yield:

It goes to seed as it dies. At its last gasp, it releases the seed says Dr. Seneff.

According to the US Department of Agriculture, as of 2012, 99% of durum wheat, 97% of spring wheat, and 61% of winter
wheat has been treated with herbicides. This is an increase from 88% for durum wheat, 91% for spring wheat and 47% for
winter wheat since 1998.

Heres what wheat farmer Keith Lewis has to say about the practice:

"I have been a wheat farmer for 50 yrs and one wheat production practice that is very common is applying the
herbicide Roundup (glyposate) just prior to harvest. Roundup is licensed for preharvest weed control. Monsanto,
 the manufacturer of Roundup claims that application to plants at over 30% kernel moisture result in roundup uptake
by the plant into the kernels. Farmers like this practice because Roundup kills the wheat plant allowing an earlier
harvest.

A wheat field often ripens unevenly, thus applying Roundup preharvest evens up the greener parts of the field with
the more mature. The result is on the less mature areas Roundup is translocated into the kernels and eventually
harvested as such.

This practice is not licensed. Farmers mistakenly call it dessication. Consumers eating products made from
wheat flour are undoubtedly consuming minute amounts of Roundup. An interesting aside, malt barley which is
made into beer is not acceptable in the marketplace if it has been sprayed with preharvest Roundup. Lentils and
peas are not accepted in the market place if it was sprayed with preharvest roundup.. but wheat is ok.. This
farming practice greatly concerns me and it should further concern consumers of wheat products."

Heres what wheat farmer Seth Woodland of Woodland and Wheat in Idaho had to say about the practice of using herbicides
for wheat dry down:

"That practice is bad . I have fellow farmers around me that do it and it is sad. Lucky for you not all of us farm that
way. Being the farmer and also the president of a business, we are proud to say that we do not use round up on our
wheat ever!"

This practice is not just widespread in the United States either. The Food Standards Agency in the United Kingdom reports
that use of Roundup as a wheat desiccant results in glyphosate residues regularly showing up in bread samples. Other
European countries are waking up to to the danger, however. In the Netherlands, use of Roundup is completely banned with
France likely soon to follow.

Using Roundup on wheat crops throughout the entire growing season and even as a desiccant just prior to harvest may save
the farmer money and increase profits, but it is devastating to the health of the consumer who ultimately consumes the
glyphosate residue laden wheat kernels.

The chart below of skyrocketing applications of glyphosate to US wheat crops since 1990 and the incidence of celiac disease
is from a December 2013 study published in the Journal Interdisciplinary Toxicology examining glyphosate pathways to
autoimmune disease.
While the herbicide industry maintains that glyphosate is minimally toxic to humans, research published in the Journal
"Entropy" strongly argues otherwise by shedding light on exactly how glyphosate disrupts mammalian physiology.

Authored by Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff of MIT, the paper investigates glyphosates inhibition of cytochrome P450
(CYP) enzymes, an overlooked component of lethal toxicity to mammals.

The currently accepted view is that ghyphosate is not harmful to humans or any mammals. This flawed view is so pervasive in
the conventional farming community that Roundup salesmen have been known to foolishly drink it during presentations!

However, just because Roundup doesnt kill you immediately doesnt make it nontoxic. In fact, the active ingredient in
Roundup lethally disrupts the all important shikimate pathway found in beneficial gut microbes which is responsible for
synthesis of critical amino acids.

Friendly gut bacteria, also called probiotics, play a critical role in human health. Gut bacteria aid digestion, prevent
permeability of the gastointestinal tract (which discourages the development of autoimmune disease), synthesize vitamins and
provide the foundation for robust immunity. In essence:

Roundup significantly disrupts the functioning of beneficial bacteria in the gut and
contributes to permeability of the intestinal wall and consequent expression of autoimmune
disease symptoms

In synergy with disruption of the biosynthesis of important amino acids via the shikimate pathway, glyphosate inhibits the
cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes produced by the gut microbiome. CYP enzymes are critical to human biology because they
detoxify the multitude of foreign chemical compounds, xenobiotics, that we are exposed to in our modern environment today.

As a result, humans exposed to glyphosate through use of Roundup in their community or through ingestion of its residues on
industrialized food products become even more vulnerable to the damaging effects of other chemicals and environmental
toxins they encounter!
Whats worse is that the negative impact of glyphosate exposure is slow and insidious over months and years as inflammation
gradually gains a foothold in the cellular systems of the body.

The consequences of this systemic inflammation are most of the diseases and conditions associated with the Western
lifestyle:

Gastrointestinal disorders

Obesity

Diabetes

Heart Disease

Depression

Autism

Infertility

Cancer

Multiple Sclerosis

Alzheimers disease

And the list goes on and on and on

In a nutshell, Dr. Seneffs study of Roundups ghastly glyphosate which wheat crops are
being doused with uncovers the manner in which this lethal toxin harms the human body by
decimating beneficial gut microbes with the tragic end result of disease, degeneration, and
widespread suffering

Got the picture yet? Even if you think you have no trouble digesting wheat, it is still very wise to avoid conventional wheat as
much as possible in your diet!

You Must Avoid Toxic Wheat No Matter What

The bottom line is that avoidance of conventional wheat [virtually anywhere worldwide] in the United States is absolutely
imperative even if you dont currently have a gluten allergy or wheat sensitivity. The increase in the amount of glyphosate
applied to wheat closely correlates with the rise of celiac disease and gluten intolerance.

Dr. Seneff points out that the increases in these diseases are not just genetic in nature, but also have an environmental cause
as not all patient symptoms are alleviated by eliminating gluten from the diet.

The effects of deadly glyphosate on your biology are so insidious that lack of symptoms today means literally nothing.

If you dont have problems with wheat now, you will in the future if you keep eating conventionally produced, toxic wheat!

How to Eat Wheat Safely

Obviously, if youve already developed a sensitivity or allergy to wheat, you must avoid it.

But, if you arent celiac or gluten sensitive and would like to consume this ancestral food safely, you can do what we do in our
home. We only source organic, preferably low gluten, unhybridised Einkorn wheat for breadmaking, pancakes, cookies etc.
But, when we eat out or are purchasing food from the store, conventional wheat products are rejected without exception. This
despite the fact that we have no gluten allergies whatsoever in our home yet.
I am firmly convinced that if we did nothing, our entire family at some point would develop sensitivity to wheat or autoimmune
disease in some form due to the toxic manner in which it is processed and the glyphosate residues that are contained in
conventional wheat products.

What Are You Going to Do About Toxic Wheat?

How did you react to the news that wheat farmers are using Roundup, not just to kill weeds, but to dry out the wheat plants to
allow for an earlier, easier and bigger harvest and that such a practice causes absorption of toxic glyphosate, the active
ingredient in Roundup and other herbicides, right into the wheat kernels themselves?

Did you feel outraged and violated like I did? How will you implement a conventional wheat-avoidance strategy going forward
even if you havent yet developed a problem with gluten or wheat sensitivity?

What about other crops where Roundup is used as a pre-harvest dessicant such as barley, sugar cane, rice, seeds, dried
beans and peas, sugar cane, sweet potatoes, and sugar beets? Will you only be buying these crops in organic form from now
on to avoid this modern, man-made scourge?

Multinational Corporate Tyranny: Draconian New Zealand Health And Supplementary

Products Bill Soon To Be Introduced
November 16 2014 | From: Jack @ TheContrail

Ive closely read this Draft Bill this morning and it is much worse than I ever could have imagined! It
is nothing less than a rubber stamp for corrupt, multinational drug companies in collusion with WHO
and our own Government to highly regulate, register and licence all natural products.

Over 5,500 Ive been told are on the Draft List already - which I cant find in this Draft Bill here that is a huge number
of products) and effectively ban private people from using or promoting all natural products unless big pharma
corporates or their agents have tested and approved them.

This will particularly apply to any natural products that are claimed to promote health, prevent or cure disease that compete
with their own products and will turn all natural health product producers, distributors, users and advocates into common
criminals.

This horrendous Bill is currently going through its Third Reading in the NZ Parliament, and it looks like it will be introduced
early in the New Year in 2015. Of course, it is part of a similar legislative regime of tyranny happening all round the world at
present promoted by the global multinational drug and pharmaceutical mafia, but it doesnt excuse us here in New Zealand to
apathetically just sit back and allow such tyrannical and oppressive legislation to pass.

If you visit the Ministry of Health Natural health and supplementary products page, then click on the The Natural Health and
Supplementary Bill and the go to the Bill itself, to appreciate what incredibly, draconian, all-encompassing fascist tyranny they
propose. Go to sub-section, 40C Offence to publish certain advertisements relating to natural health and supplementary
products.

Here you will read, to my mind, the greatest abomination I have ever read. (Bear in mind that many of these products to which
these contemptible psychopaths refer are in fact, common natural foods, herbs, vitamins and minerals etc. which mankind has
freely used or eaten for thousands of years! And now they want to licence, register and own the rights to them!

Do read the whole sub-section to get the full picture of what really, is indescribable greed and wickedness. Here is a quick
extract:

Sub-section 40C (1) A person must not publish or cause to be published (either on that persons own account or as
the agent or employee of the person seeking to promote the sale) any advertisement that -

a) directly or by implication states or suggests that a natural health and supplementary product for sale in New
Zealand may be administered by- 1) injection or parental infusion; or 2) application to the eye;

b) includes any health benefit claim that directly or by implication states or suggests that a natural health and
supplementary product for sale in New Zealand is able to treat or can assist in the treatment of a named condition.

(3) A person who contravenes subsection (1) commits an offence and is liable to a fine not exceeding- a) $250,000,
in the case of a body corporate; b) $50,000, in the case of an individual

(4) In subsection (1), - advertisement means any words, whether written, printed or spoken, and any pictorial
representation or design, used or appearing to be used to promote the sale of any natural health and
supplementary product and includes any trade circular, any label, and any advertisement in a trade journal
publish means -

a) insert in any newspaper or other periodical publication printed or published in New Zealand; or

b) send to any person by post or otherwise; or

c) deliver to any person or leave upon premises occupied by any person; or

d) broadcast within the meaning of the Broadcasting Act 1989; or

e) bring to the notice of the public in New Zealand in any other manner.

This friends, is only a small part of the Bill. At least in my view, it is the most tyrannical, far-reaching, draconian, dictatorial and
contemptible legislation ever to be introduced in our countys history.

The terminology itself, because it is so wide and all-encompassing,(for example, the phrase, bring to the notice of the public in
any other manner) brings in other Acts and penalties as well, for example, the New Zealand Misuse of Drugs Regulations
1977. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/1977/0037/latest/w...

Its not generally an issue I have had a lot to do with myself, and I admit Im certainly not an expert on the general subject of
health supplements at all. However, based on this draft legislation in hand, and it looks like it is going to be passed before
Parliament winds up for the Parliamentary Christmas recess. All I can say is, God help us all!

What an utter disgrace that there has hardly been a murmur from the general public! Of course the media have largely been to
blame too, as they have been very quite about it as well, not surprising, as they generally are owned by the same global banks
that control the drug companies.

I mean, really though, what an utter shocker, that these impertinent, money-hungry, pharmaceutical and medical corporate
charlatans (with their subservient bureaucratic puppets drafting this destructive legislation) even have the cheek and gall to tell
us ordinary, law-abiding, thinking citizens that now the best ingredients in the very food we all eat, most of which have been
commonly promoted for good health for thousands of years, now have to be officially registered, licenced or banned by an
increasingly totalitarian State, in collusion with a powerful gang of fascist UN agencies and global multi-national corporate
pirates, and if we dont all comply, we soon will be prosecuted as common criminals and liars.

What an utter disgrace that almost the entire nation is just sitting back and putting up with this nonsense.

To my mind, if I cant freely and openly express my personal opinion to others, make a statement or recommend, for example,
to my friend next door, that Vitamin C will help cure his common flu or whatever, without any dictatorial government approval,
licence, regulation or fear of criminal prosecution I am no longer living in a free and open democracy.

Vaccines And Herd Immunity Nonsense

November 14 2014 | From: JonRappoport

Related: Healing from Vaccine Injuries through Homeopathy

Hail to the group! The group is all! The concept of herd immunity (protection for the population) is
often used by vaccine addicts as a way to push guilt at people who dont line up, with their children,
like robots for their shots.

According to a description of the "disease" published in the Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, children with
SCT are basically daydreamers, which Big Pharma is now using as a catch-net classification for children who can't be
declared as having attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

From the point of view of protecting people who are already vaccinated, herd immunity is flat-out absurd. Little Jimmy, whose
parents have decided not to vaccinate him, will pass diseases on to kids who are already vaccinated? Oh, you mean those
immunized kids arent really safe? Then why did you vaccinate them in the first place?

From another point of view, herd immunity is the idea that people who cant be vaccinated (for example, those who are
obviously allergic to elements contained in vaccines) will gain a measure of protection, if larger and larger numbers of others
are vaccinated.

The vaccinated protecting the unvaccinated.

This is foolish, because what actually protects people against disease is the strength of their immune systems, and that
strength has nothing to do with vaccination. If a person has a weak immune system, he will get dangerously sick, and it
doesnt matter how many people around him are vaccinated against how many diseases.

So even if one accepts the (false) premise that vaccines are effective and safe, the premise of herd immunity is ludicrous.

Vaccination is, in fact, a cover story used to conceal the fact that the health of populations has everything to do with good
nutrition, adequate sanitation, and an absence of toxic elements in the environment.

There are many doctors who know this, but they refuse to speak out, because they know theyll suffer consequences.

Vaccination, as a propaganda strategy, is used to medicalize the populationto assert that good health is fundamentally a
medical matter. It isnt. If tomorrow, two things happened, they would change the face of health in any industrialized country:

One, millions more people buying healthy food and/or growing their own food, in yards; and in inner cities, growing food in
community gardens; And two, the courts delivering justice in the form of billion-dollar fines and long, long prison sentences to
corporate employees (including CEOs) for severe and real pollution.

Note: That justice would eliminate GMO crops which rely on toxic pesticide use.

Im not spinning rainbows. Im just pointing out that, with these two changes alone, hospitals and clinics and doctors offices
would empty out, and the medical cartel would finally experience vast comeuppance.

Health and life are not medical functions. Any science that claims they are is false science, and the people who make those
claims are liars or morons or criminals, or some combination of all three.

Rumsfeld & Monsanto Team Up To Bring You Neuro-Toxic Aspartame & Splenda
November 12 2014 | From: WakingTimes

Donald Rumsfeld, the very same politician who supports GMOs, is perhaps the singular man who
got Splenda onto the market after the FDA initially refused it.
If you have gotten sick from consuming this toxic substance, you can thank him, along with its makers. Splenda was
created by the British company Tate & Lyle along with the pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson.

As we get closer to the holidays, many people look for ways to cut back on sugar and other indulgences so that when the New
Year rolls around, they wont have to work so hard to lose those extra pounds. While it is a good idea to avoid sugar
altogether, using the artificial sweeteners Splenda or Aspartame might be even worse. There are numerous reasons you
should avoid the stuff in little yellow packages (or pink, or blue). Here is why.

Donald Rumsfeld, the very same politician who supports GMOs, is perhaps the singular man who got Splenda onto the
market after the FDA initially refused it. If you have gotten sick from consuming this toxic substance, you can thank him, along
with its makers. Splenda was created by the British company Tate & Lyle along with the pharmaceutical giant Johnson &
Johnson.

Perhaps you remember when the Coca-Cola company launched its ad campaign to fight obesity back in the early 80s? This
was all part of a ploy to begin the use of aspartame, whose patent was once owned by none other than Monsanto!
Ironically, there are numerous studies that show this stuff causes obesity. It doesnt prevent obesity.

Before they started selling you Splenda, it was called NutraSweet. In 1985, Monsanto purchased G.D. Searle, the chemical
company that held the patent to aspartame, the active ingredient in NutraSweet, as well as Splenda and many other artificial
sweeteners. Is Splenda safe? It depends who you ask.

Lets look at a little timeline, shall we?

1901: Monsanto Chemical Works is formed.

1976: When Ford loses the 1976 election, Rumsfeld returns to private business life, and is named president and CEO of
the pharmaceutical corporation G. D. Searle & Company, during which time he leads the legalization of Aspartame.

1977: Monsanto stops producing PCBs.

1997: Monsanto businesses are spun off as Solutia Inc.

1999: John Hunter is named chairman and CEO.

2000: Monsantos Pharmaceutical Services Division is created. Monsanto also merges with the drug-maker Pharmacia &
UpJohn Inc., which took control of the Searle pharmaceutical operations, and the current Monsanto Co. was incorporated as a
subsidiary in October 2000.

2002: PCB trial results in sharp drop in stock price.

Check out this video for more information.

Dr. James Bowen, a physician and biochemist, says that he developed ALS from aspartame ingestion. He has just recovered
form stomach cancer also attributed to aspartame. Bowen has been researching the product since it was given free reign on
the market, and it almost cost him his life. He attests that it is a horrible chemical poison that is really just chlorinated sugar.

Whats even more suspect is that Donald Rumsfeld was on the Board of Directors at Monsantos Searle pharmaceuticals even
before he helped get aspartame through the FDA, and he has been supporting the biotech companys plans to take over the
world seed supply as well.

The sugar substitute was approved for use in foods as a sweetener in 1998. Before approving sucralose, the FDA claimed to
have reviewed 110 human and animal studies, but it turns out that only 2 out of those studies were actually on humans.

Splenda is just the trademarked brand name of sucralose, and this is still one of the best selling artificial sweeteners on
grocery store shelves today.

Potential Negative Effects of Splenda

Here are just a few of the negative health impacts Splenda can have on people:
 Splenda and sucralose consumption alter the healthy micro-flora of the gut, making it more difficult for your immune
system to work as it should while fueling gastro-intestinal diseases. In animal studies Splenda reduced the healthy gut flora by
50%! It also affected P-glycoprotein (P-gp) levels.

Splenda alters the efficacy of many drugs. While it would be better to treat your disease with natural remedies, if you are
taking meds for cancer or heart disease, Splenda could be interfering with that.

Splenda may even alter genes. This sounds familiar when coming from a company who splices and dices the genome like
some kind of freak show. The molecules are manipulated and this may also cause molecules in our bodies to be altered as
well.

Splenda causes obesity. This toxic substance alters blood sugar levels and can lead to increased chances of getting
diabetes as well as obesity. It tricks your body into eating more, and with more calories, you know what happens unwanted
weight gain.

Splenda shrinks the thymus gland by up to 40%. You need your thymus; it helps to regulate the heart and is responsible
for many endocrine functions, including balancing metabolic rate. Why would you want to eat something that shrinks your
thymus to the size of rat scat? Yuck.

James Turner, the chairman of the national consumer education group Citizens for Health, has expressed shock and outrage
over new reports from scientists outlining the dangers of this substance.

So, while many studies point to its safety, many others (which as less discussed) have found that these artificial sweeteners
are actually harmful. Its up to you to decide whether to ingest this questionable substance or not.

8 Proofs We Dont Need GMOs To Feed The World

November 7 2014 | From: NaturalSociety

Key research shows we don't need GMOs to feed the world

Do we really need Monsantos GMOs to feed the world? Looking at the research and the studies, the answer is quite
clear. Lets take a look at the 8 proofs that we most certainly do not need GMOs to feed the world:
1. One Organic Rooftop Farm Can Feed 9,000 People

One organic rooftop farm can feed 9,000 people. They dont use pesticides, herbicides, or fungicides, and they provide fresh
produce to their community year-round (1). This is a big slap in the face to the biotech companies who lie, saying that GMO is
needed to feed the world. This is only one urban farm bucking the system.

"Several of the high profile advocates for conventional agricultural production have stated that the world would
starve if we all converted to organic agriculture. They have written articles for science journals and other
publications saying that organic agriculture is not sustainable and produces yields that are significantly lower than
conventional agriculture. - Avery (2000) Trewavas (2001)

Are these claims really true?

2. Small Organic Farms Are Working, Even In Major Cities

Lufa Farms has an astonishing approach to feeding the world. Their newest rooftop hothouse in the suburb of Laval near
Montreal, produces enough veggies for more than 9,000 people.

According to Lufas founder Mohamed Hage, this is only the beginning. From rhubarb to kale, and organic milk, cheese, and
tofu, Lufa is feeding its community without following Big Ag practices. The company plans to expand to Chicago soon.

3. Airports Serving Sustainable Foods?

Or take La Guardia airport yes, you read that right. An airport is also sticking it to Monsanto, Bayer and Syngenta by serving
organic, local, and sustainable food at their upscale eateries scattered through different terminals.

Read: Russians Prove Small-Scale Organic CAN Feed the World

Agribusiness advocates such as Steve Kopperud need a reality check. They think you cant feed the world on organic,
sustainable, non-GMO food, but they are dead wrong.

4. The UN Admits We Dont Need GMOs

Even the UN once admitted that:

organic and other sustainable farming methods that come under the umbrella of what the studys authors called
agroecology would be necessary to feed the future world.

You can read the pdf here.

5. Sustainable Agriculture = Increased Crop Yields

Further, an editorial in 'New Scientist' stated that low-tech sustainable agriculture is increasing crop yields on poor farms
across the world, often by 70 percent or more. This is achieved by replacing synthetic chemicals with natural fertilizers and
natural pest control methods, while the Union of Concerned Scientists has pointed out that GE crops are failing to yield:

. . .GE soybeans have not increased yields, and GE corn has increased yield only marginally on a crop-wide basis.
Overall, corn and soybean yields have risen substantially over the last 15 years, but largely not as result of the GE
traits. Most of the gains are due to traditional breeding or improvement of other agricultural practices.
Conversely, vertical organic farming is going high tech and big-scale. Utilizing the space equal to a small one-bedroom
apartment, healthy food can be grown for a small family.

Using a combination of new growing techniques and more sustainable energy practices, food markets around the
world could soon benefit from the adoption of plant factories taking up a lot less space than traditional agriculture
but boasting significantly more production.

6. Aquaponics

Also look at places like Urban Organics in Minnesota. They use aquaponics to grow food sustainably. The company was
established in an old brewery, which was vacant for almost two decades. They now grow a variety of herbs and healthy
vegetables.

7. States Taking Action

Maine is also growing loads of organic food. The Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association suggests this
economical solution:

"Consider the fact that half a pound of pole bean seeds, which you can buy for between $4 and $15 depending on
the catalog and variety of bean, will plant a 100-foot row that can yield 150 pounds of beans The price of fresh,
organic green beans at Maine farmers markets is about $3 per pound, so even if you paid $15 for your seed, that
150 pounds would have grossed $435 for you!

8. Home Gardening: Grow Your Own Food!

Even home gardeners are increasing their organic food yields with tried and true techniques that have been around for ages.
Just planting according to your growing region can help you yield a cornucopia of fresh, healthful food. For a list of the best
regional varieties, look here.

Biotechnology companies like Monsanto rely heavily on claims that GMOs will solve world hunger. Their marketing strategy
says it all: Produce more. Conserve more. Improve lives, but we can produce more, and of a much higher quality without
resorting to biotech tricks.

The Medical Cartel Is King In A Globalist World

November 5 2014 | From: JonRappoport

Elites who invent reality need an unimpeachable operation, headed up by people who are
relentlessly promoted as the sanest, most intelligent, competent, and caring representatives of the
human race. Guess who that would be? (The Magician Awakes, Jon Rappoport)
In 1976, the great critic of 20th-century society, Ivan Illich, wrote: Modern medicine is a negation of health. It isnt
organized to serve human health, but only itself, an institution. It makes more people sick than it heals.

The medical cartel is the answer to the question: what do you with the population of Earth once they are living under a
globalist oligarchy?

Its all about managing lives, from womb to grave, and no institution serves that management better than Medicine.

First of all, you have a system that dispenses toxic drugs in an endless stream, killing in the US alone, by conservative
estimate, 100,000 people per year. On top of that, medical drugs cause anywhere from two to four millions severe adverse
effects annually.

Beyond this straight-out destruction, there is the turmoil, suffering, grieving, and confusion that extends in ripples, from each
one of the deaths and injuries, to families, friends, and co-workers. The overall effect? Demoralization and the inability to see
and think past the emotional painwhich is exactly what you want if you are a psychopath running a planet.

The medical cartel (drug companies, public health agencies, medical schools, doctors) wants to assure cradle-to-grave
treatment of every person. This means 30 or 40 diagnoses of illnesses and mental disorders during a lifetime, and treatment
with toxic drugs. It also means medical issues are at the forefront of every persons mind as he/she wends through life,
believing that Disease is the most important aspect of living.

People become proud, yes, proud of their diagnoses and treatment. They wear the diagnoses like badges of honor, and every
social communication is an occasion for displaying badges and discussing treatments and comparing notes.

"You know, at first my doctor thought it was ADHD, but then he did one of those new brain scans, and realized it
was Bipolar with a trace of genetically inherited Oppositional Defiance Disorder. Once he had the ODD under
control with a major tranquilizer, he could go after the Bipolar. But then I developed tremors. So he implanted a
chip
Its not only a sick society, its a society about sickness.

Medical care is free, if by free one means: paid for by extraordinary levels of taxation.

The basic collectivist slogan, Were all in this together, achieves its most fervent support from the axiom that Disease is our
primary opportunity to help each other by accepting awesome tax burdens.

Of course, huge segments of the world population wont be able to participate in modern, up-to-date, cutting-edge care. For
them, there are several solutions. The first is vaccines seeded with chemicals and genes that reduce fertility and potency. As
birth rates gradually decline, cover stories are invented to explain the phenomenon: stress; rising employment rates; the social
effects of urbanization; the dissolution of the nuclear family.

The second solution is epidemics that purportedly kill off large numbers of people. These epidemics are routine frauds, based
on concocted science. In the poverty-stricken Third World, announced epidemics are nothing more than cover stories; people
arent dying because of germs; theyre dying because their water is contaminated, because of overcrowding, lack of basic
sanitation, generation-to-generation starvation.

Theyre dying because their fertile growing lands have been stolen. While medical experts crow about attacking the germ of
the moment with (toxic) drugs and vaccines, these actual causes of death can be ignored and even enhanced.

Meanwhile, in industrialized technological sectors of the planet, psychiatry ascends to new heights of control over the
educated classes. Although no so-called mental disorder has ever been diagnosed by a real laboratory test, the experts who
dominate the field continue to invent new disorders at the drop of a hat.

Psychiatric patients believe they have brain conditions that must be treated with (highly toxic) drugs. The patients also believe
their own aspirations are limited by their disorders, and so they acquiesce to a psychiatric model that circumscribes their lives.

At the top-end of society, new medical inventions are applied to the wealthy. Genetic enhancement is the most highly touted of
these. Despite the fact that, as yet, there are no genetic treatments for any disease that work across the board, experiments
will be done to extend life, to seed the unborn with special talents, to cure a wide variety of illnesses.

There will be efforts to substitute technological components for biological nature. Limbs, organs, whole body systems, brains.

The workability of high-tech pieces is not really the issue. The aim is simply to involve the rich in the entire grand experiment,
thereby swallowing them up as well in a medical paradigm of existence.

At the front door of medical cartel operations, a person will be enrolled in the system while in utero, and a path will be laid out
that extends all the way to the grave. Once he is on record with a medical ID package, he will be tracked and treated and
tweaked without let-up.

Draconian New Zealand Natural Health And Supplementary Products Bill

November 4 2014 | From: Jack @ TheContrail

I dont know if you saw the propaganda on the Rethink program on TV3 this morning about the
draconian Natural Health and Supplementary Products Bill (modelled on Australias) thats presently
going through Parliaments legislative process at present which is expected to be implemented in
early 2015.
Dr Shaun Holt, an Adjunct Professor at Victoria University was on the TV panel as he is on the committee also
preparing the Bill. Basically this will mean in about 2 or 3 months time it will be the end of private people like us
bringing in natural health supplements from overseas as all these products including all ingredients are going to be
regulated and put on a Permitted Ingredients List.

Basically the Ministry of Health is to set up a Natural Health and Supplementary Products Authority to oversee and manage
the new legislation, where all Natural Health Supplementary Products (NHSPs) being imported, distributed or sold in New
Zealand must have a Product Notifier either the manufacturer or the importer.

The authority will prepare and maintain a list of all the permitted ingredients, at present about 5,500 are on the draft list. This is
real Nazi-style legislation, because if you want to use any ingredient that is not on the list of approved ingredients the
notifier must apply to the Authority.

This is the culmination of about 9 years work by the multi-national big Pharma Mafia to get all vitamins, minerals and natural
health supplements regulated, thanks to the general apathy and ignorance of almost the entire nation. The game is now just
about up is it not! Obviously now is the time to stock up.

By the way, Dr Shaun Holt, just happens to control a medical trials company, P3 Research, and he sees himself and his
company as one of the foremost successful candidates to review and test these products in the new regime! Money again!
They cant help themselves can they?

Deconstructing The Ebola Agenda & Is the Bilderberg Group Behind Ebola?
+ The Effective Treatment For The Bioweapon That Is Ebola
October 19 2014 | From: Zengardner / Youtube / Whitewraithe / TVNZ / PaulCraigRoberts

It looks like were going to be saddled with this ebola roll-out for a while. It seems to be working
according to plan as the public jumps on the fear bandwagon and all kinds of media reports are
taken at face value regarding whats going on. A very easy environment to manipulate public
sentiment, emotions and responses which is their favorite milieu.
The old problem reaction solution game.

[ See end of article for updates ]

I dont like dwelling on this subject but it is front and center now and we are still in the process of deconstructing it all which is
important to do. True knowledge is empowering, especially in the face of a matrix of deceit thats trying to tighten its web of
control to new levels right now.

When we see things for what they are they no longer have any power over us, as long as we stay out of the many traps they
lay for us in our daily activities.

What Are US Biowar Researchers Doing In The Ebola Zone?

August 21 2014 | From: JonRappoport

This is a call for an immediate, thorough, and independent investigation of Tulane University researchers
(see here and here) and their Fort Detrick associates in the US biowarfare research community, who have been
operating in West Africa during the past several years.

What exactly have they been doing? Exactly what diagnostic tests have they been performing on citizens of Sierra
Leone? Why do we have reports that the government of Sierra Leone has recently told Tulane researchers to stop
this testing?

Have Tulane researchers and their associates attempted any experimental treatments (e.g., injecting monoclonal
antibodies) using citizens of the region? If so, what adverse events have occurred?

The research program, occurring in Sierra Leone, the Republic of Guinea, and Liberiasaid to be the epicenter of
the 2014 Ebola outbreakhas the announced purpose, among others, of detecting the future use of fever-viruses
as bioweapons.

Is this purely defensive research? Or as we have seen in the past, is this research being covertly used to develop
offensive bioweapons?
 For the last several years, researchers from Tulane University have been active in the African areas where Ebola is
said to have broken out in 2014.

These researchers are working with other institutions, one of which is USAMRIID, the US Army Medical Research
Institute of Infectious Diseases, a well-known center for biowar research, located at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

Continue reading here

A lot of good information is coming out of the alternative media, but even that needs processing and careful evaluation in light
of the hype being thrown at us. We need to see what resonates and let it steep for a while as new information surfaces. Most
of all, if it engenders even more fear its not a place to go. True helpful information is empowering, although often challenging
to our previous ideas or subconscious paradigms. And thats good. Just let things sink in and put them in the holding tank to
either stay around for further evaluation or to eventually get flushed out as either false, detrimental or superfluous information.

It certainly does appear that the US Government has patented the Ebola virus, and to gain a patent on something it
has to be a new invention or method, with no existing prior art. Download a copy of the US patent here.

Most of all, beware the spirit of the information. Fear, and especially panic as it appears is starting to appear, should be kept
out of our minds and hearts. Nothing good can come of them no matter how fascinating the projection may appear to be
much like their ghoulish zombie meme carefully embedded in society. Nor is this a time to take any of this flippantly as the war
is on for our minds and we must be vigilant.

Latest from the Globalist WHOs Scare Machine

As an example and to try to keep this metastasizing situation in perspective and where they want to take it, heres something
from todays news:

LONDON (AP) West Africa could see up to 10,000 new Ebola cases a week within two months, the World
Health Organization said Tuesday, also confirming the death rate in the current outbreak has risen to 70 percent.

WHO assistant director-general Dr. Bruce Aylward gave the figures during a news conference in Geneva.
Previously, WHO had estimated the Ebola mortality rate was at around 50 percent.

Aylward said the new rate confirmed it was a high mortality disease, and that the U.N. health agency was still
focused on trying to get sick people isolated and provide treatment as early as possible.

He told reporters that if the worlds response to the Ebola crisis isnt stepped up within 60 days, a lot more people
will die and that health workers will be stretched even further dealing with the spiraling numbers of cases. (Source)

Note that regarding any information coming out about any of this, nothing is substantiated or verifiable, nothing is documented.
Were forced to take their word for it as mainstream propaganda gains a tighter and tighter grip on information. In fact, CNN
and others have been caught staging ebola deaths to drive this issue forward. Not surprising, just as theyve done with reports
of atrocities in the staged terror war.

Overview The Apparent Program At Work

Overall, we know there are plans to lower the worlds population levels. A lot of macabre scenarios and images have been
around a long time, from FEMA camps, guillotine purchases, weird trains for shackled passengers, huge amounts of stored
plastic coffins and massive mass burial graves being constructed.

Meanwhile people are well aware of many other programs regarding the deliberate poisoning of humanity. Many of these such
as the debilitating electromagnetic radiation war on humanity are sidelined in peoples consciousness but they are just as
potent as this ebola scare.

They are all designed to wear down and weaken the human condition. Again, very dark but important information. The
endgame is what we come to realize and its certainly not for humanitys benefit.
That realization is the one those we call asleep refuse to recognize. They can see corrupt government and corporate greed in
most cases, but as far as connecting the dots to the rest of the programs and the overall plan, they think that is more than they
can bear.

Well, its just the opposite. Refusing to see the light of truth will lead them to a quick and desperate demise.

The Multi-Benefit Plan

As always, there are several parallel benefits for the power elite with these types of engineered false flag scenarios. Already
the US has sent more of their infamous boots on the ground to do who knows what there in Africa. It just so happens these
resource rich nations would provide some wonderful bounty for the corporate and bankster outlaws.

Meanwhile, the entire continent of Africa has been a gem imperialists have wanted full domination over for a long time, so
what better way than to decimate their populations via engineered malnutrition, massive vaccine programs and rampant
disease introduction as well as fomented civil warsand then send in the solution more US and NATO decimation.

Same old bag of dirty tricks.

Similarly, reducing the US to a military controlled impoverished third world status has been their intention all along. Ebola is
simply another step in this progression. Theyve obviously been planning feverishly for some major disaster scenario for a long
time. Weve been watching these programs converge and a medical emergency is a diabolically clever route. After all, whos
going to confront an epidemic or medical teams with guns?

Behold the castration of the people. Will they see it coming?

But thats not all. The neocons are feverishly predicting a nuclear strike on US territory in order to keep the terrorism meme in
full play at the same time. Talk about a squeezed population. When anything goes, anything goes. And these psychotic social
engineers will be sure it does.
Their Relentless War on the Human Immune System

Amongst the many assaults on humanity is the vaccine program. Like chemtrails, vaccines are a delivery system. Once
desperate people are accustomed to taking intravenously something to supposedly help and protect them, and will then
voluntarily, cooperatively and even eagerly line up to get their injections, you have the perfect system in place.

Already bombarded with drugs and adulterated foods, air and water the duck is sitting awaiting its demise.

Now all you need is the motivation. Hence, long eradicated diseases have been resurrected and others genetically modified
into new, more virulent strains. They really havent worked that well, as SARS and Swine flu and a few others had way less
cases than the normal seasonal flu, statistics of which have been buried in media hype.

It seems the human immune system is pretty damn good at resisting invasion by enemy viruses just fine.

So thats why theyre are at war with our resilient immune systems. Like our unquenchable spirit and eternal consciousness,
the amazing human body is incredibly adaptive and self healing if we just feed it healthy and living foods and take reasonable
care of it. So what do they do?

Attack our immune system, with anything and everything they can to weaken it. Heavily adulterated and genetically modified
food, fluoridated water and chemtrailed air, and the most direct attack of all, vaccines laden with mercury and other toxins and
most of all adjuvants agents to deliberately overtax and weaken the immune system, along with the viruses theyre
embedding into these vaccines. Diabolical, but a reality.

Theres one more thing thats being woefully forgotten about in this overall picture. Radiation, the ultimate assault on anything
living. Well get to that in a minute as its a crucial piece of the puzzle.

Where Does Ebola Come In?

Ebola supposedly evolved in Africa beginning in the 70s, with small outbreaks each decade since, but with lots of media
hype and imagery about how devastating and horrific it was. Its very similar to another known disease there called Marburgs
disease so Ebola may have been their first attempt at altering it.

We do know mad scientists in biolabs have been tinkering with and creating bioweapons, on the pretext of producing
protection against bioweapons, for a long, long time. They just cant resist anything that can be weaponized, especially if all
you have to do is introduce it into a population and it does all the rest on its own.

Pretty efficient and cost effective and very easy to cover any involvement via plausible deniability. Such is the way of the evil
sorcerers.

Other so-called pandemics, the definition of which was altered to be much broader by the complicit WHO, have not taken off
but served their purpose of creating warm up scenarios and getting the public used to the idea, as well as load them up with as
many vaccines as possible.
This is how to break down the immune system which comes in real handy when this next round of viral warfare gets
introduced. As John Rappoport points out, like AIDS, Ebola could very well be a catch name for a variety of symptoms caused
by just about anything.

Makes total sense to me. The ultimate scare and control umbrella.

With the fear tactics being stepping up and the lying propaganda in full swing people are going to think even the most common
ailments could be ebola now, and either go into a depression and hide, or flee to the nearest clinic where their chances of
getting sick increase 100 fold especially if they take a vaccine. Whats worse is newly empowered authorities can suspect or
claim anything they want as ebola now that that heavily loaded word has been programmed into everyones head.

The following clip is a pretty good rundown of the vaccine agenda, a very important aspect to be very familiar with as this
program rolls out. Take particular note of the rabies connection, which according to the physician in the video is nearing
epidemic proportions, though unreported in the corporate media.

The X-Factor the Public Will Never Hear About Radiation Sickness

Its stunning the similarities between the symptoms of ebola and radiation sickness. Americans especially have been
continually bombarded with toxic radiation from Fukushima for over 3 and a half years now. Radiation poisoning symptoms
take time to appear. Weve talked about this several times, as its one of those ticking time bombs were all monitoring. Its the
same with chemtrail and GMO poisoning and their long term effects and not a pleasant subject to ponder, but we cant hide
our heads in the sand.

This is now.

What most people dont realize is that the effects of radiation poisoning are many, and cancer is only one of a long list of
symptoms and causes of death, including a host of seemingly unrelated issues like heart attacks and diabetes which are
escalating wildly. Whats most remarkable is that the supposed symptoms of ebola and the known symptoms of radiation
sickness are almost identical.
These include, for both:

Fever
Headache
Nausea
Vomiting
Diarrhea
CNS Impairment
Stomach Pain
Bleeding
Bruising
Muscle Pain
Hair Loss

Is there a connection? At the least, if this program keeps rolling out and more and more are showing radiation sickness
symptoms it will all get put under the heavy constraints of the ebola control program, which is metastasizing into a form of
medical martial law. Ebola may even partially be a plan to mask as well as utilize this reality using their new catch all bug
paradigm.

But this whole radiation aspect is something to be aware of. Its upon us front and center as much as anything coming at us.

Claim Your Immunity

I find it inspiring that the wonderful immune system is so resilient and that theyre having such a hard time putting out our flame
of resistance. Its so representative of their war on our consciousness which they can never win. There may be serious
casualties in the months and years to come if this keeps rolling out but they cant quench our eternal spirit no matter what. If
we graduate from here we just move on to the next level and on with the show we go!

Fear is one of the biggest weapons against the immune system, as well as for our spiritual immune system. Stay clear of it.
Fear of death is the ultimate fear for many and that really needs to go. Theres no place for it. It doesnt even make logical
sense never mind any spiritual sense. Its perhaps the biggest underlying fear porn program of all, fostered by everything the
social engineers can come up with. Its time to shake it.

And whatever you do, do not get vaccinated for anything nor let those you know and love do so either. That may take getting
off the grid in some cases, but steer clear of possible checkpoints, especially when they start to make vaccinations mandatory.

Above all, live above it all. Keep raising your voice exposing these lies and continue to bolster the courage and awareness of
those around you, but stay above it.

Kick your empowering activities into high gear and keep on the offensive. And stay happy. Its the best medicine and great for
both types of immune systems! Theres plenty to be absolutely ecstatic about. The stars still shine through the chemtrail haze
and the sun still basks our gorgeous living planet in warmth and positive energy.

Identify whats going on for what it is but dont stare at the illusory cage theyre trying to erect, thats what they want us to do.

Keep your vibration high and keep the laughter flowing. Oh how that infuriates these dark types when we laugh at them, and
oh how it keeps us smoothly sailing above it all!

Is The Bilderberg Group Behind Ebola?

August 22 2014 | Produced, written and edited by Kris Zane, narrated by Tom Hinchey

Anonymous Doctor Releases Treatment For The Ebola Virus

The actual treatment for ebola which will virtually eliminate fatalities, as revealed by a doctor who has worked with ebola, is
below.

Consider this: The "elite" would never release a plague without an easy cure, and along with this ebola outbreak an American
biowarfare firm has been working in Sierra Leon for the last five years. Google that. Sierra Leon has actually identified them as
the perpetrators of this outbreak and kicked them out of the country. There is absolutely no doubt this outbreak was
intentionally caused by the U.S. war department.

And if it is intentional, a cure is known. There would simply be no other way to do business.

Here is the treatment, complete with MOA. This is a treatment and not a cure, your immune system wipes out the
virus, and the treatment gives your immune system time to do it.

Here is what Ebola does that is fatal: It causes the complete removal of all vitamin C from the body.

No one actually knows what mechanism is involved in doing this, other than a malfunction that is not permanently destructive
to whatever is triggered to remove all vitamin C. All the researchers know is that vitamin C drops to zero and all the symptoms
of ebola are consistent with a complete loss of vitamin C.

A doctor who has remained anonymous and has worked with ebola victims has discovered this and sent it to this web site, at
last check [time of reciept] this could not be googled which confirms this doctor did not just copy paste, please help to share
this information.

From an anonymous doctor:Summary:

The very first symptoms of ebola are exactly the same as scurvy, which is caused by inadequate vitamin C.
Though scurvy is seldom fatal as a primary condition, scurvy also represents only a partial deficiency of vitamin C,
the body still has a LOT of vitamin C compared to zero, which ebola causes.

Absent ANY vitamin C, blood vessels become very weak and start to lose blood, and platelets become ineffective
and unable to trigger clots. So death by ebola is caused by massive internal bleeding and loss of blood, which can
be stopped simply by taking enormous doses of vitamin C until the immune system succeeds in killing off the virus.

Begin text:

Ebola is probably the best known of a class of viruses known as hemorrhagic fever viruses. In fact, Ebola virus was initially
recognized in 1976.
Other less known but related viral syndromes include yellow fever, dengue hemorrhagic fever, Rift Valley fever, Crimean-
Congo hemorrhagic fever, Kyasanur Forest disease, Omsk hemorrhagic fever, hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome,
Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, Venezuelan hemorrhagic fever, Brazilian hemorrhagic fever, Argentine hemorrhagic fever,
Bolivian hemorrhagic fever, and Lassa fever.

The Ebola virus infection, also known as African hemorrhagic fever, has the distinction of having the highest case-fatality rate
of the viral infections noted above, ranging from 53% to 88%.

These viral hemorrhagic fever syndromes share certain clinical features. The Cecil Textbook of Medicine notes that these
diseases are characterized by capillary fragility, which translates to easy bleeding, that can frequently lead to severe shock
and death. These diseases also tend to consume and / or destroy the platelets, which play an integral role in blood clotting.

The clinical presentation of these viral diseases is similar to scurvy, which is also characterized by capillary fragility and a
tendency to bleed easily. Characteristic skin lesions develop, which are actually multiple tiny areas of bleeding into the skin
that surround the hair follicles. some cases even include bleeding into already healed scars.

In the classic form of scurvy that evolves very slowly from the gradual depletion of vitamin C body stores, the immune system
will be sufficiently compromised for infection to claim the patients life before the extensive hemorrhage that occurs after all
vitamin C stores have been completely exhausted.

Ebola virus and the other viral hemorrhagic fevers are much more likely to cause hemorrhaging before any other
fatal infection has a chance to become established. This is because the virus so rapidly and totally metabolizes and
consumes all available vitamin C in the bodies of the victims that an advanced stage of scurvy is literally produced
after only a few days of the disease.

The scurvy is so complete that the blood vessels generally cannot keep from hemorrhaging long enough to allow an infective
complication to develop.

Also, the viral hemorrhagic fevers typically only take hold and reach epidemic proportions in those populations that
would already be expected to have low body stores of vitamin C, such as is found in many of the severely
malnourished Africans. In such individuals, an infecting hemorrhagic virus will often wipe out any remaining vitamin
C stores before the immune systems can get the upper hand and initiate recovery.

When the vitamin C stores are rapidly depleted by large infecting doses of an aggressive virus, the immune system gets
similarly depleted and compromised. However, this point is largely academic after hemorrhaging throughout the body has
begun.

To date, no viral infection has been demonstrated to be resistant to the proper dosing of vitamin C as classically demonstrated
by Klenner. However, not all viruses have been treated with Klenner-sized vitamin C doses, or at least the results have not
been published.

Ebola viral infection and the other acute viral hemorrhagic fevers appear to be diseases that fall into this category. Because of
the seemingly exceptional ability of these viruses to rapidly deplete vitamin C stores, even larger doses of vitamin C would
likely be required in order to effectively reverse and eventually cure infections caused by these viruses.

Cathcart (1981), the WHO introduced the concept of bowel tolerance to vitamin C discussed earlier, hypothesized that Ebola
and the other acute viral hemorrhagic fevers may well require 500,000 mg of vitamin C daily to reach bowel
tolerance!

Whether this estimate is accurate, it seems clear as evidenced by the scurvy-like clinical manifestations of these infections that
vitamin C dosing must be vigorous and given in extremely high doses. If the disease seems to be winning, then even more
vitamin C should be given until symptoms begin to lessen.

Obviously, these are viral diseases that would absolutely require high doses of vitamin C intravenously as the initial therapy.
The oral administration should begin simultaneously, but the intravenous route should not be abandoned until the clinical
response is complete. Death occurs too quickly with the hemorrhagic fevers to be conservative when dosing the vitamin C.
(from Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases, and Toxins:Curing the Incurable by Thomas E. Levy MD JD)

To learn how to make Limposomal Encapsulated VItamin C yourself click here. Liposomal Encapsulated Vitamin C can
be made cheaply and relatively easily at home, and taken orally. It is 4x - 6x stronger than IV (intravenously administered)
Vitamin C - which costs $NZ 200 per dose.

Comment: I may not be a doctor, but I am awful good with medical topics, and this rings 100 percent true, it is the MOA [the
author is referring to IV Administration] which if combined with some of my medical knowledge, such as the fact that Broccoli is
absolutely excellent for assisting the clotting of blood, that the active component of Noni (which is in pineapple juice) is
strongly anti viral, and that cures such as colloidal silver, while good for bacterial infections does nothing for viruses, combine
some real knowledge with what this doctor says and it is highly probable that Ebola can be shrugged off as a mild case of
scurvy.

Colloidal Silver

Colloidal silver is great stuff, and I have made gallons from a 1 ounce silver bar myself. It works great for
curing BACTERIALinfections and making water safe to drink without the nasty taste of iodine.

However Colloidal Silver will DO NOTHING against viruses

Untruths are being spread that misguide as to a falsure Ebola cure.

All curative agents have a mode of action, or MOA. And if anyone posting medical cures does not know the MOA, they have
no idea what they are talking about. Colloidal silver has an MOA that has been known for many decades, yet recently Google
has been rigged to bury it with only articles stating the MOA is being explored and we think it is ___(then disinfo) and there
has to be a reason why this is being done right now, at this point in time with Ebola running amok.

Here is how colloidal silver actually works (its MOA), with first an example:

Colloidal silver is to bacteria what cyanide is for all red blooded organisms. In red blooded organisms, cyanide binds with
hemoglobin in place of oxygen, and makes it impossible for blood to carry oxygen. With enough cyanide, oxygen starvation via
cyanide bonded hemoglobin causes death.

Colloidal silver does the same for bacteria, it binds with the oxygen carriers in bacteria permanently, causing bacteria to
quickly die from oxygen starvation. This is the MOA for colloidal silver, which has been clearly known practically forever.

Viruses have NO METABOLIC PROCESS which require an oxygen barrier, and therefore Colloidal Silver will be
COMPLETELY USELESS AGAINST EBOLA

Do not let the misinformed in the alternative media fool you by saying colloidal silver is effective against viruses in any way,
colloidal silver is only useful for treating secondary bacterial infections that move in after a preceeding viral infection and in the
case of ebola, there is not enough time for that to make a difference.

It is extremely important to note that a huge psy op is underway to fake colloidal silver as a cure for viruses and there
HAS TO BE A REASON, DO NOT FALL FOR IT.

See the following video regarding high-dosage Vitamin C which has been used now in many cases to treat many illnesses
including cancer.
Anton Kuraia
'Sunday' meets Anton Kuraia who has been battling cancer with vitamin C

This story was aired on national NZ mainstream television on October 21 2014. Despite the medicinal spin - this is yet another
example that high-dosage Vitamin C helps to save lives.

To learn how to make Limposomal Encapsulated VItamin C yourself click here.

Obama Fights Ebola With A Czar And Soldiers

October 17 2014 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

UPDATE: Liberian Scientist Claims US Is Responsible For Ebola Outbreak In West Africa

The public continues to be reassured that ebola is not a problem for the US, but CNN reports that Obama has appointed
an Ebola Czar. The Czar is not a medical person but an insider lawyer who served as chief of staff to Vice President Biden.

Little wonder ebola conspiracy theories are spreading faster than ebola. And as far as any of us know, the conspiracies could
be true.

University of Illinois law professor Francis Boyle, an expert of the perfidies of the US government, reminds us that Sierra
Leone and Liberia, the countries most affected by the ebola outbreak, are two West African countries that host US biological
warfare laboratories. Professor Boyle asks how the disease, which is mainly associated with equatorial Congo reached West
Africa thousands of kilometers away.

Washingtons response is itself peculiar. The Obama regime sent 4,000 US soldiers to West Africa to fight ebola. Soldiers
dont have training or equipment with which to combat ebola. Why expose 4,000 Americans to an epidemic? This seemingly
pointless decision has raised suspicions that Washington is exposing troops to ebola so that vaccines or treatments can be
tested on the troops.

Are they:

A. Going to get the troops to shoot the virus?

B. Using the troops to occupy and thieve more natural resources under the guise of 'assistance'?
 C. Using the troops as Guinea-pig test subjects for exposure to the latest version of the bioweapon?
D. After infection by exposure / vaccination, using troops as vehicles for exporting the virus live to the US?

[ Attempts to import the virus back into the US have not worked very well to date, and they need to get a
critical mass of continental US 'exposure victims' - before they can try to cover up contrived local mass
virus releases from the hundreds of stateside bioweapons facilities ]

Other commentators have noticed that West Africa is an area of Chinese investments. They wonder if Washington is using the
cover of ebola to occupy the countries or even set the disease loose in order to drive out the Chinese. The new US Africa
Command was formed to counteract Chinese economic penetration in Africa.

The incompetence of US public health authorities in responding to ebola gives legs to these theories. Real conspiracies
abound. Those who say its just a conspiracy theory need to look up the meaning of conspiracy. As one commentator
observed, the CDCs response to ebola is too stupid for stupid.

The CDCs protocol is based on assumptions about ebola that do not seem to be true for the current strain. A nurse, who
treated the ebola patient in Dallas who died, was given the green light to fly commercially even though she reported to CDC
that she had symptoms. She exposed 132 passengers on the flight, and these passengers have since been in contact with
thousands of other people.

The Daily Mail has published photographs of an American with a clipboard and without protective suiting boarding the nurse
on a private airplane on way to hospital quarantine.

US public health authorities have imposed no quarantine on travel to the US from infected countries. US airlines continue to fly
to and fro from the infected countries despite the risk of introducing new infections into the US.

African countries are doing a much better job than the hegemonic superpower. They have closed borders, prevented air travel,
and tracked down infected persons and those exposed to them.

Instead of taking sensible precautions, the Obama regime appoints an Ebola Czar and sends 4,000 Americans into the areas
where the disease rages.

Little wonder that Americans have no confidence in their government.

As the Republicans want to privatize and outsource everything, why not close down Washington and outsource our
governance to a more competent country?

And there is this also: Ebola Hoax: Hidden Purpose Of The Operation

Updates October 21 2014:

Also see these damning Ebola Bioweapon references from this new article from PaulCraigRoberts that cover the following
articles:

Two Scientists Say Ebola Originated In US Bio-warfare Lab

US Bio-warfare Laboratories in West Africa Are The Origins Of The Ebola Epidemic

Ebola Is A GMO Product Of US Bio-warfare Laboratories

Also see: US Army withheld promise from Germany that Ebola virus wouldnt be weaponized

Update October 22 2014:

Also see: The Entry of Ebola into the US Has Hallmarks of a Planned Happening

Huge Plunge In Kindergarteners Vaccination Rates: Officials Stumped

& My Son Passed Away After His Shots Alicia LeAnn Bohn
October 4 2014 | From: Infowars / VaccineInformationNetwork

The number of parents deciding not to vaccinate their children growing at an alarming rate &
A mothers story of how her son passed away after his shots.

Considering the quite heavy vaccination schedules proposed by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), American
Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), parents should be refusing
vaccinations.

Since the 1950's, the number of vaccines children under 6 are expected to obtain has grown by 414%. Apparently, at least
Californian parents have had enough and are refusing to immunize their kindergarten-aged children.
Public health experts are saying that these refusals to have their children vaccinated (at a rate of half as often than just 7 years
ago) is contributing to the re-emergence of measles across the state, and may lead to serious outbreaks of other diseases.
But this is nothing more than scare-mongering and the typical line of vaccination-pushers.

Actually, there are numerous studies which show that un-vaccinated children are far healthier than their vaccinated peers.

Findings uncovered during one study looking at New Zealands children found that:

. . . 92 percent of the children requiring a tonsillectomy operation had received the measles vaccination, indicating
that the vaccination for measles may have made some of the children more susceptible to tonsillitis.

The percentage of kindergartens in which at least 8% of students are not fully vaccinated because of personal beliefs has
more than doubled as well, according to data on file with the state.

Health officials are not pleased with this trend since they believe in herd immunity, and since according to experts, measles
and whooping cough need at least 92% of kids immunized. The CDC is a big pusher of herd immunity, but as a direct result of
vaccinations, mucosal immunity in children is very weak. This leads to more than one million children having to have tubes put
in their ears every year due to Otitis Media or glue ear. It is a buildup of water in the ear, which requires this invasive medical
procedure.

Despite herd immunity propaganda, there is no system of the human being, from mind to muscles to immune system, which
gets stronger through avoiding challenges, but only through overcoming challenges.

Furthermore, it is a lie that disease will spread without vaccinations at a 95% rate. In truth, most states fail to meet the CDCs
goals of extending basic immunizations to 80% (not 95%) of children. Rates ran as low as 65% in Colorado in years past, and
as low as 75% in Florida. This did not cause a sudden epidemic of measles, or flu, or whooping cough. Some experts suggest
that herd immunity is a myth created by those who might profit from it,. It looks like many Californian parents agree, or at least
are wary of vaccines in general.

Five days a week, [children are] in their small classroom, said Shannon Stokley, an epidemiologist at the National
Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Thats
the perfect conditions for spreading germs and spreading infections.

What Stokley seems to disregard are the numerous other factors which can contribute to outbreaks.

Barbara Loe Fisher, president of the National Vaccine Information Centre, a consumers group based in Virginia, argues
thatvaccines are responsible for the increasing numbers of children and adults who suffer from immune system and
neurologic disorders, hyperactivity, learning disabilities, asthma, chronic fatigue syndrome, lupus, rheumatoid
arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and seizure disorders. She believes more studies to monitor the long-term effects of mass
vaccination should be conducted. She wants physicians to be absolutely sure these vaccines are safe and not harming
people.

Neil Z. Miller, vaccine investigator, points to the polio vaccine as an example. It is now responsible for every new polio case in
the U.S.

Holly Blumhardt and her husband, Shannon, are part of a growing minority in Orange County and other affluent areas across
the county: They do not vaccinate their children. She says:

It is part of a larger philosophy. I think that we are very aware, from the foods that we eat, like being more organic,
non-GMO . . . We just want to have the healthiest family that we can.
California immunization rates have been dropping since the 1980s, but the recent drop in the past 7 years is a convenient
excuse for health officials to claim for a disease that could have been caused by super bugs, environmental conditions like
drought, and any number of other mitigating factors.

The trend is especially pronounced in Orange County, where the proportion of kindergartners with their full shots fell
from 92.9% in 2003 to 89.3% in 2012, predominantly in the countys wealthy beachfront communities. The county is also
battling the states largest measles outbreak in recent memory: 22 cases.

The CDC blames anti-vaxers for the recent outbreak. Assistant surgeon general Dr. Anne Schuchat says:

The current increase in measles cases is being driven by unvaccinated people, primarily U.S. residents, who got
measles in other countries, brought the virus back to the United States and spread to others in communities where
many people are not vaccinated.

Within the report, however, was an admittance that unvaccinated missionaries returning from the Philippines were included in
their data, where a measles outbreak of 20,000 reported cases resulted in 50 deaths.

90 percent of all measles cases in the United States were in people who were not vaccinated or whose vaccination
status was unknown. Among the U.S. residents who were not vaccinated, 85 percent were religious, philosophical
or personal reasons.

Even high antibody titers in people only convey a 68% chance of protecting against or delaying clinically manifest measles. In
Africa, vaccination with the MMR-vaccine has reduced the diseases vaccinated against, but has doubled mortality rates in
infants after a single dose.

California state law requires kindergartners to be vaccinated against measles, pertussis (whooping cough), polio, mumps,
rubella, hepatitis B, chicken pox, diphtheria and tetanus.

Parents who claim immunization is against their personal beliefs can get exemptions. Some parents opt out of all the
mandatory shots, while others allow students to get select vaccinations. There are also temporary and medical exemptions
available.

My Son Passed Away After His Shots Alicia LeAnn Bohn

My son Gunner Wayne was born on 14 January 2014. He passed away less than 18 hours after his 8 week old shots:

HIB (PEDVAXHIB)

PEDIARIX (DTAP-HEP B-IPV)

PREVNAR

ROTATEQ 3

The medical examiners can say SIDS but I know the truth. And Im not gonna stop til I get the truth out!

When I asked the medical examiner if they will be able to tell if his shots had anything to do with his death and the response I
got back was I cant speak of that leaves me to only believe my gut feeling.

I urge parents and new parents to be, to do your research before you inject your child with a lethal set of cocktail shots.

I would give anything to have this little boy back!! Reasearch before it's too late!
Alicia LeAnn Bohn

The Vaccine-Autism Lie

October 2 2014 | From: JonRappoport

Ive analyzed this lie before and approached it from many angles. Here Im going to keep things as
simple as possible. Vaccines can and do cause damage. Neurological damage, brain damage.

Parents of damaged children know this. There were there. They saw their children before vaccination and after
vaccination. End of story. Everything else, and I mean everything is diversion. High-class sophisticated deceptive
slimy arrogant diversion.

Shuffling various disease and disorder labels; the studies claiming there is no link between vaccines and autism; the hoops the
government makes parents jump through, in order to try to obtain financial compensation; the legal deal allowing vaccine
manufacturers to avoid law suits; the invented cover stories claiming autism begins in utero or is a genetic disorder; the
pretension that autism has even been definedthere is no defining diagnostic test for it -

All lies. All avoidances.

A child gets a vaccine. The child suffers brain damage. That happens.

Thats the truth which the government buries in a mountain of obfuscation.

In general, how much damage do vaccines cause every year in the US? Unsurprisingly, there is no reliable count.

For a sane reference, see In the Wake of Vaccines, by Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the private National Vaccine
Information Center. Her article was published in the Sept./Oct. 2004 issue of Mothering Magazine.
Gathering information from several sources, Fisher makes a reasonable estimate of vaccine damageactual figures are not
available or carefully tracked or vetted. The system for reporting adverse effects is broken.

Fisher: But how many children have [adverse] vaccine reactions every year? Is it really only one in 110,000 or one
in a million who are left permanently disabled after vaccination?"

Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler observed in 1993 that less than 1 percent of doctors report adverse events
following prescription drug use. [See DA Kessler, Introducing MEDWatch, JAMA, June 2, 1993: 2765-2768]

There have been estimates that perhaps less than 5 or 10 percent of doctors report hospitalizations, injuries, deaths, or other
serious health problems following vaccination. The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act contained no legal sanctions for not reporting;
doctors can refuse to report and suffer no consequences.

Even so, each year about 12,000 reports are made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System; parents as
well as doctors can make those reports."

[See RT Chen, B. Hibbs, Vaccine safety, Pediatric Annals, July 1998: 445-458]

However, if that number represents only 10 percent of what is actually occurring, then the actual number may be
120,000 vaccine-adverse events. If doctors report vaccine reactions as infrequently as Dr. Kessler said they report
prescription-drug reactions, and the number 12,000 is only 1 percent of the actual total, then the real number may
be 1.2 million vaccine-adverse events annually.

Then why does the government say, over and over, that vaccines are safe?

Because they want to lie. What about all the studies that show this vaccine and that vaccine are safe?

The following quote will give you a clue. The writer is an insiders insider, and a doctor. Shes scrutinized more published
medical studies than all the highly educated science-blog writers in the world put together.

Dr. Marcia Angell, for 20 years, was the editor of the most prestigious medical journal in America.

On January 15, 2009, the NY Review of Books published Dr. Angells devastating assessment of medical literature:

It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment
of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached
slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.

[Marcia Angell, MD, Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption. NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.]

If the universe were poised on the brink of extinction, and it could only be saved by avoiding one more lie, and you had to
choose between believing a distinguished medical expert on vaccines and autism or the mother of a vaccine-damaged child, it
would be no contest. You could make your choice in a second without hesitation, and it would be the right one.

Believe the mother.

12 Facts About Microwave Ovens That Should Forever Terminate Their Use
September 29 2014 | From: PreventDisease

Are microwaves a benign bastion of convenience or a sinister contributor to biological and

nutritional damage?

A growing percentage of people are now heeding the advice of holistic health experts and disposing of their
microwaves due to the dangers of microwaved food. Regardless of where you stand, humans are the only animals on
the planet who destroy the nutritional value of their food before eating it, and the use of microwaves is no exception.

How Do Microwaves Work?

Microwaves use super-fast particles to literally radiate the contents of water inside food and bring it to boil.

Microwaves are a source of electromagnetic energy (a form of nonionizing form of radiation) electronically generated. When
penetrating the aliments, they trigger an inner rotation of the water molecules inside the food. This rotation triggers a friction
between the molecules and the result is a rapid growth in temperature.
 Microwaves use super-fast particles to literally radiate the
contents of water inside food and bring it to boil.

Not only has microwave use been linked to causing

infertility in men, but it also denatures many of the essential
proteins in the food making them virtually indigestible.

Most animals will only consume food in its natural,

unprocessed state, but humans actually go out of their way
to render food nutritionally worthless before eating it.

Think about all the prepackaged and processed foods we

purchase and consume annually. It's no wonder the state of
our health is in dire straits.

Microwave ovens work physically, biochemically and physiologically, producing ions and various free radicals, which destroy
viruses and bacteria, but not toxins and microtoxins. The experts have concluded that food cooked in microwaves loses
between 60% and 90% of its vital energy and, at the same time, the structural disintegration processes accelerates.

Also, the nutrient substances are altered, leading to digestive diseases. These microwaves can increase both the number of
cancerous cells in blood and the number of stomach and intestinal cancerous cells.

Radiation Exposure

Microwaves leaking radiation is a serious issue. Serious enough for the FDA to set legal limits on the leakage permitted by
every microwave manufacturer. However, the only way to completely eliminate the radiation dangers associated with
microwaves is not to use one. Microwave radiation has been known to cause cataracts, birth defects, cancer and other serious
illnesses.

Because of these causes the microwave ovens were banned in the Soviet Union in 1976. Soviet scientists found that the
microwave exposure decreases the ability of some vitamins to by absorbed by the human body, dramatically accelerates the
structural disintegration of all foods and reduces the metabolic stress of the alkaloids, glycosides and galactoses.

In 1991, the Swiss Doctor Hans Ulrich Hertel made a study that demonstrated that cooking or heating food presents much
greater risks for health than the traditionally cooked food. He found that people who ate microwave prepared food recorded
losses in the hemoglobines and lymphoites.

In 2003, a Spanish governmental study elaborated in Murcia demonstrated that the vegetables and fruits cooked in a
microwave lost a percentage of 97% of the substances that contribute to reducing the incidence of coronary heart diseases.

In Dr. Lita Lees book, Health Effects of Microwave Radiation Microwave Ovens, and in the March and September 1991
issues of Earthletter, she stated that every microwave oven leaks electro-magnetic radiation, harms food, and converts
substances cooked in it to dangerous organ-toxic and carcinogenic products.

In a study entitled Comparative Study of Food Prepared Conventionally and in the Microwave Oven, published by
Raum & Zelt in 1992, at 3(2): 43, it states:

"Artificially produced microwaves, including those in ovens, are produced from alternating current and force a billion
or more polarity reversals per second in every food molecule they hit. Production of unnatural molecules is
inevitable. Naturally occurring amino acids have been observed to undergo isomeric changes (changes in shape
morphing) as well as transformation into toxic forms, under the impact of microwaves produced in ovens.

There are no atoms, molecules or cells of any organic system able to withstand such a violent, destructive power for any
extended period of time, not even in the low energy range of milliwatts. Microwaves quickly destroy the delicate molecules of
vitamins and phytonutrients (plant medicines) naturally found in foods. One study showed that microwaving vegetables
destroys up to 97% of the nutritional content (vitamins and other plant-based nutrients that prevent disease, boost immune
function and enhance health).
Dr. Hertel was the first scientist to conceive and carry out a quality clinical study on the effects microwaved nutrients have on
the blood and physiology of the human body. His small but well controlled study showed the degenerative force produced in
microwave ovens and the food processed in them.

The scientific conclusion showed that microwave cooking changed the nutrients in the food; and, changes took place in the
participants blood that could cause deterioration in the human system. Hertels scientific study was done along with Dr.
Bernard H. Blanc of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and the University Institute for Biochemistry.

12 Effects of Microwave Radiation

1. A breakdown of the human life-energy field in those who were exposed to microwave ovens while in operation, with
side-effects to the human energy field of increasingly longer duration;

2. A degeneration of the cellular voltage parallels during the process of using the apparatus, especially in the blood and
lymphatic areas;

3. A degeneration and destabilization of the external energy activated potentials of food utilization within the processes of
human metabolism;

4. A degeneration and destabilization of internal cellular membrane potentials while transferring catabolic [metabolic
breakdown] processes into the blood serum from the digestive process;

5. Degeneration and circuit breakdowns of electrical nerve impulses within the junction potentials of the cerebrum [the front
portion of the brain where thought and higher functions reside];

6. A degeneration and breakdown of nerve electrical circuits and loss of energy field symmetry in the neuroplexuses [nerve
centers] both in the front and the rear of the central and autonomic nervous systems;

7. Loss of balance and circuiting of the bioelectric strengths within the ascending reticular activating system [the system
which controls the function of consciousness];

8. A long term cumulative loss of vital energies within humans, animals and plants that were located within a 500-meter
radius of the operational equipment;

9. Long lasting residual effects of magnetic deposits were located throughout the nervous system and lymphatic system;

10. A destabilization and interruption in the production of hormones and maintenance of hormonal balance in males and
females;

11. Markedly higher levels of brainwave disturbance in the alpha, theta, and delta wave signal patterns of persons exposed
to microwave emission fields, and;

12. Because of this brainwave disturbance, negative psychological effects were noted, including loss of memory, loss of
ability to concentrate, suppressed emotional threshold, deceleration of intellective processes, and interruptive sleep episodes
in a statistically higher percentage of individuals subjected to continual range emissive field effects of microwave apparatus,
either in cooking apparatus or in transmission stations.

Take a look around you at every person that still uses a microwave. The largest majority are unhealthy and overweight. The
more you use the microwave, the worse your nutritional state gets, and the more likely you are to be diagnosed with various
diseases and put on pharmaceuticals which, of course, will create other health problems that lead to a grand spiraling
nosedive of health.
Of all the natural substances -- which are polar -- the oxygen of water molecules reacts most sensitively. This is how
microwave cooking heat is generated -- friction from this violence in water molecules. Structures of molecules are torn apart,
molecules are forcefully deformed, called structural isomerism, and thus become impaired in quality. This is contrary to
conventional heating of food where heat transfers convectionally from without to within. Cooking by microwaves begins within
the cells and molecules where water is present and where the energy is transformed into frictional heat.

The following is a summary of the Russian investigations published by the Atlantis Raising Educational Center in
Portland, Oregon:

Microwaving prepared meats sufficiently to insure sanitary ingestion caused formation of d-Nitrosodienthanolamines, a well-
known carcinogen.

Microwaving milk and cereal grains converted some of their amino acids into carcinogens.

Thawing frozen fruits converted their glucoside and galactoside containing fractions into carcinogenic substances.

Extremely short exposure of raw, cooked or frozen vegetables converted their plant alkaloids into carcinogens.

Carcinogenic free radicals were formed in microwaved plants, especially root vegetables.

Russian researchers also reported a marked acceleration of structural degradation leading to a decreased food value
of 60 to 90% in all foods tested. Among the changes observed were:

Deceased bio-availability of vitamin B complex, vitamin C, vitamin E, essential minerals and lipotropics factors in all food
tested.

Various kinds of damaged to many plant substances, such as alkaloids, glucosides, galactosides and nitrilosides.

According to Dr. Lee, changes are observed in the blood chemistries and the rates of certain diseases among consumers of
microwaved foods. The symptoms above can easily be caused by the observations shown below.

The following is a sample of these changes:

a.. Lymphatic disorders were observed, leading to decreased ability to prevent certain types of cancers.

b.. An increased rate of cancer cell formation was observed in the blood.

c.. Increased rates of stomach and intestinal cancers were observed.

 d.. Higher rates of digestive disorders and a gradual breakdown of the systems of elimination were observed.

Decrease in Food Value

Microwave exposure caused significant decreases in the nutritive value of all foods researched. The following are the most
important findings:

1. A decrease in the bioavailability [capability of the body to utilize the nutriment] of B-complex vitamins, Vitamin C, Vitamin
E, essential minerals and lipotropics in all foods;

2. A loss of 60-90% of the vital energy field content of all tested foods;

3. A reduction in the metabolic behavior and integration process capability of alkaloids [organic nitrogen based elements],
glucosides and galactosides, and nitrilosides;

4. A destruction of the nutritive value of nucleoproteins in meats;

5. A marked acceleration of structural disintegration in all foods.

How Do You Heat Your Food The Healthy Way?

This is kind of a misnomer because there is truthfully, with perhaps the exception of dehydration, no way to heat food and
maintain its structural and nutritional value. However, gently heating food in a cast iron pan over the stove may be the
healthiest alternative to nuking it. This is the old fashioned way and it never failed our ancestors.

Toss that microwave and strive to consume at least half of your diet from raw foods, that is a huge step in the right direction to
maintain their nutritional value. My mother always used to tell me that if food comes from a package, or has to be heated to be
eaten, there's a good a chance it's low in nutrition. She was right for the most part, so keep that in mind when venturing the
aisles at the grocery.

Big Pharma Invents 'Sluggish Cognitive Tempo' Disease To Drug Millions More Children
September 27 2014 | From: NaturalNews

The drug industry has come up with yet another phony mental illness that it says afflicts as many as
2 million children: "Sluggish Cognitive Tempo," or SCT, one of the most ridiculous counterfeit
diseases yet.

According to a description of the "disease" published in the Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, children with
SCT are basically daydreamers, which Big Pharma is now using as a catch-net classification for children who can't be
declared as having attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

The emergence of SCT comes as parents, medical professionals and child psychologists increasingly question the validity of
the millions of ADHD diagnoses that are really just cases of kids being kids. In order to keep these children drugged up and
the cash flowing, the psychiatric and drug industries basically invented SCT as a fallback. In other words, when an ADHD
diagnosis doesn't fly, declare the child to have SCT.

Many of the children currently diagnosed with ADHD don't exhibit actual signs of hyperactivity, for instance. And yet some of
them aren't performing in school as well as their teachers or parents would like, which in years past may have been enough to
make an ADHD diagnosis. But the public is wising up to the scam, hence the invention of SCT.

"As a former mental health therapist, I can barely hold back my laughter at this thinly veiled attempt to separate
parents from their hard earned money by making them think that... their perfectly normal child is mentally ill," wrote
Dave Hodges for The Common Sense Show.

"The main characteristics of [SCT] are vaguely described but include some combination of daydreaming, lethargy
and slow mental processing, you know, like we do when we watch television."

Eli Lilly waiting like a vulture to medicate kids for SCT

Though the alleged condition isn't mentioned by name in the official Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), the sacred text
of the psychiatric religion, SCT is clearly described as a supposed subtype of ADHD, which as we previously reported is also a
made-up condition. To overcome the hyperactivity misnomer in some diagnosed children, the DSM simply created a new
category out of thin air that excludes it.

Dr. Allen Frances from Duke University in North Carolina says this change is nothing more than "a fad in evolution," worrying
that even more children will be misdiagnosed with ADHD when they are perfectly normal and healthy. This blatant attempt at
medicating as many children as possible has also been described as "disease-mongering," practitioners of which include drug
giant Eli Lilly, which is set to release new drugs for SCT that will rake in billions.

"'Sluggish Cognitive Tempo' may possibly be the very dumbest and most dangerous diagnostic idea I have ever encountered,"
wrote Dr. Allen Frances, M.D., for Psychology Today.
 "Child psychology / psychiatry / pediatrics / family medicine have become fevered fields of diagnostic excess,
pharmaceutical manipulation, and careless medication prescription," he added.

"In just 20 years, rates of ADHD have tripled and Autism and childhood Bipolar Disorder have increased 40-fold."

Like many others, Dr. Frances agrees that the ADHD "epidemic" is nothing but contrived chicanery, pointing out a New York
Times series by investigative journalist Alan Schwartz that reveals the extent of the scam. That series is available
here: NYTimes.com

"Egged on by well meaning (and not so well meaning) experts and by greedy drug companies, we are fast
approaching this dystopic wonderland of universal childhood mental illness," concluded Dr. Frances.

"I would be in despair were it not for my belief that diagnostic exuberance has overplayed its hand and is ripe for a
very big humpty-dumpty type fall."

The Dirty, Filthy Unvaccinated

September 18 2014 | From: VaccineLinks

Is it extreme to say that unvaccinated children (or their parents) are facing discrimination? Not if
things keep going the way theyre headed.

Related: Healing from Vaccine Injuries through Homeopathy

 "Your children cant go to school with other children.

Keep your dirty filthy kids away from my kids.

We will not be providing medical care for children like yours any longer. Please seek medical care elsewhere.

You dont deserve to be a parent. You should be in jail for child abuse.

I hope your children prove you wrong by dying.

Dont you love your kids?

These are some of the comments parents have told me theyve received from people in their lives: doctors, schools, co-
workers, friends, and family members. We are the parents of unvaccinated children.

My children were born this way: Vaccine-free.

And I want to keep them that way. I do not want to inject drugs into them before they can walk and talk- at 12 hours old; before
I even know who they are. Are my children dirty? Are they walking germ-pools?

Are people with black skin dirty? Are homosexuals walking germ-pools, infecting us all with AIDs?

Of course not! These are stigmas- negative and unfair beliefs- that come from fear, misunderstanding, discrimination and
inaccurate teachings. At one point in time, they are stigmas that much of society held. But just because the majority of society
believes something doesnt make it true.
Unvaccinated children are not walking around spreading disease simply because theyre unvaccinated. Our children are not
dirty, and they are not a danger to society.

Read the full story at: VaccineLinks

Shocker: Comparing Deaths From Medical Drugs, Vitamins, All US Wars

September 14 2014 | From: JonRappoport

People want to believe medical science gives us, at any given moment, the best of all possible
worlds.

And of course, the best of all possible worlds must have its enemies: the quacks who sell unproven snake oil.

So lets look at some facts.

As Ive been documenting for years, the medical cartel has been engaged in massive criminal fraud, presenting their drugs as
safe and effective across the boardwhen, in fact, these drugs have been killing and maiming huge numbers of people, like
clockwork.

Ive cited the groundbreaking review, Is US Health Really the Best in the World?, by Dr. Barbara Starfied (Journal of the
American Medical Association, July 26, 2000), in which Starfield reveals the American medical system kills 225,000 people per
year106,000 as a direct result of pharmaceutical drugs.

Ive now found another study, published in the same Journal, two years earlier: April 15, 1998; Incidence of Adverse Drug
Reactions in Hospitalized Patients. It, too, is mind-boggling.

The authors, led by Jason Lazarou, culled 39 previous studies on patients in hospitals. These patients, who received drugs in
hospitals, or were admitted to hospitals because they were suffering from the drugs doctors had given them, met the following
fate:

Every year, in the US, between 76,000 and 137,000 hospitalized patients die as a direct result of the drugs.

Beyond that, every year 2.2 million hospitalized patients experience serious adverse reactions to the drugs.
The authors write:

Our study on ADRs [Adverse Drug Reactions], which excludes medication errors, had a different objective: to
show that there are a large number of ADRs even when the drugs are properly prescribed and administered.

So this study had nothing to do with doctor errors, nurse errors, or improper combining of drugs. And it only counted people
killed who were admitted to hospitals. It didnt begin to tally all the people taking pharmaceuticals who died as consequence of
the drugs, without being admitted to hospitals.

I found the link to this study at the Dr. Rath Health Foundation, in the middle of a very interesting article by Dr. Aleksandra
Niedzwiecki: Commentary on the Safety of Vitamins.

Here are two key quotes from her article:

In 2010, not one single person [in the US] died as a result of taking vitamins (Bronstein, et al, (2011) Clinical
Toxical, 49 (10), 910-941).

In 2004, the deaths of 3 people [in the US] were attributed to the intake of vitamins. Of these, 2 persons were said
to have died as a result of megadoses of vitamins D and E, and one person as a result of an overdose of iron and
fluoride. Data from: Toxic Exposure Surveillance System 2004, Annual Report, Am. Assoc. of Poison Control
Centers.

Summing up:

No deaths from vitamins (2011), and three deaths (2004) from vitamins/iron/fluoride.

106,000 deaths every year from pharmaceutical drugs (Starfield).

Between 76,000 and 137,000 deaths from pharmaceutical drugs every year in hospitalized patients (Lazerou).

The FDA and its quack-buster allies go after vitamins, demean unproven remedies, and generally take every possible
opportunity to warn people about alternatives, on the basis that they arent scientifically supported.

Meanwhile, the very drugs these mobsters are promoting, and certifying as safe and effective, are killing and
maiming people at a staggering rate.

The masses are treated to non-stop PR on the glories of the US medical system.

In the Wikipedia entry, US military casualties of war, the grand total of all military deaths in the history of this country, starting
with the Revolutionary War, is 1,321,612.

In any given 10 years of modern medical treatment? 2,250,000 deaths (Starfield).

Consider how much suppression is necessary to keep the latter number under wraps.

Steve Jobs Kept His Kids Away From iPads

September 13 2014 | From: NewZealandHerald

He may have been dubbed "the master evangelist of the digital age", but even the late Steve Jobs
worried about the effect technology has on children.

Comment: This story also relates to the book The Light Bulb Mafia which warns about the dangers of backlit LED
iPhones, iPads, computer and TV screens and white LEDs causing blindness and other major health problems etc.

Also See: Cupertino, We Have a Problem. WiFi & Kids: An open letter to Apple Inc.

The following amazing article about the late Steve Jobs Apple co-founder dumbfounding revelations he prevented
his own children from using iPads is in this mornings NZ Herald.

Same situation as vaccinations, food and everything else. Many doctors dont vaccinate their own children because
they aware of the serious adverse effects of them, yet they are quite happy to lie through their teeth and recommend
them to everybody elses children. [Thanks to Jack for this]

While he persuaded millions that Apple's chic but pricey gadgets were a must-buy, turning the company from a basket case to
a global powerhouse, he prevented his own children from using iPads and limited their access to the internet generally.

To a generation of young people it may sound like the most boring of the seven circles of hell, but the Jobs' children would
instead sit around a long dinner table in the kitchen and actually talk to one another.

The shock revelation that Jobs' children were not uber-geeks came from United States journalist Nick Bilton, who recalled a
conversation with the Apple co-founder in 2010, a year before he died.

Jobs had called him to complain after Bilton wrote about a perceived failing of the iPad, which had just gone on sale. Bilton,
writing in the New York Times, said that "after he had finished chewing me out" he had been shocked by Jobs' response to a
question that was mainly designed to change the subject.

So, your kids must love the iPad?" he asked. But Jobs replied: "They haven't used it. We limit how much
technology our kids use at home."

Bilton said he responded "with a gasp and dumbfounded silence".

 "I had imagined the Jobs' household was like a nerd's paradise: that the walls were giant touch screens, and the
dining table was made from tiles of iPads," he wrote.

Walter Isaacson, the author of the biography called simply Steve Jobs, told him later that "every evening Steve
made a point of having dinner at the big long table in their kitchen, discussing books and history and a variety of
things".

"No one ever pulled out an iPad or computer. The kids did not seem addicted at all to devices," he added.

Chris Anderson, ex-editor of technology magazine Wired, who has five children aged 6 to 17, agreed with the Jobs family
approach.

"My kids accuse me and my wife of being fascists and overly concerned about tech, and they say that none of their
friends have the same rules," he told Bilton. "That's because we have seen the dangers of technology first-hand. I
don't want to see that happen to my kids."

There is some scientific support for the idea that modern technology can be damaging. A study, published last month, of 11-
and 12-year-olds found that removing digital devices, including televisions, for five days saw an improvement in social skills.

New Zealand Fluoridation Review Unscientific And Intellectually Dishonest Say

International Reviewers
September 12 2014 | From: Scoop

These are the key observations of five independent international experts who were asked to peer
review the fluoridation review recently conducted in secret by the Royal Society and the Office of the
Prime Ministers Chief Science Advisor.
Two of these peer reviewers were members of the US National Research Council panel that spent three years
reviewing the research on fluorides toxicity the most comprehensive review in history.

Also See: Dr. Dean Burk - Fluoride Causes Cancer - "...this amounts to public murder on a grand
scale..."

Almost everywhere in the report, scientific evidence is selectively cited to produce a biased view of the evidence.

This review does not meet the standards of critical scientific analysis. It is a political document.

This report is a clear example of cherry picking, where only select studies that support the 'safe and effective'
viewpoint were cited. I'm disgusted by how sloppy the NZ reviewers were. They were obviously politically
motivated,

- Dr Hardy Limeback, former National Research Council Review panel member and head of preventive dentistry,
University of Toronto.

This report is such a joke that it does not deserve the time spent to critique it. Why do a scientific review on a
political/propaganda report?

One key area of blatant misrepresentation identified by peer reviewers was the discussion on neurotoxicity, in particular the IQ
studies.

The review falsely states that the Harvard meta-analysis found only a 0.45 IQ point drop due to fluoride, when it actually found
a 6.9 IQ point drop. This error was publicised by the Harvard authors two years ago, after fluoridationists misrepresented the
findings.
 The NZ authors inability to understand this measure indicates they have little experience reading meta-analyses.
This gives us little assurance they have correctly interpreted other scientific papers they reviewed for their
report said one peer reviewer.

The report's incredible blooper on the Choi paper casts doubt on its authors' basic competence to interpret
numerical data, says Spedding Micklem PhD, co-author of The Case Against Fluoride.

The review also misleadingly claims that all the IQ studies were at very high levels of fluoride exposure, when many were at
levels similar to those experienced in fluoridated NZ communities.

The review then gives significant weight to the Dunedin IQ study by Broadbent et al, even though it is a very poor study that
failed to allow for significant confounding factors, and where the total exposure to fluoride was likely the same for both groups.

The NZ report authors seem to be simply regurgitating false claims that have been made by fluoridation
proponents, rather than actually reading the scientific studies they claim to be reviewing.

The NZ Reviews emphasis on Broadbents study reveals they are either biased or incompetent, or both, says
Chris Neurath, Research Director, American Environmental Health Studies Project.

In all this report sets out to do what Sir Peter Gluckman inadvertently admitted when its existence was exposed by New Health
NZ to confirm what we know about the safety and effectiveness of fluoridation.

This it has done, by cherry-picking studies that support that viewpoint, and ignoring or denying the validity of studies
that show fluoridation to be not only ineffective, but unsafe. Documents obtained under the Official Information Act
confirm that no review of toxicology studies was ever done for this report.

The review team was made up of hand selected fluoridationists to ensure this outcome. This practice was acknowledged in the
otherwise pro-fluoridation book Fluoride Wars published in 2009.

The authors state A review of the membership of the various panels confirms that the expert committees that put
together reports [over the course of 50 years] are rife with the names of well-known medical and dental researchers
who actively campaigned on behalf of fluoridation or whose research was held in high regard in the pro-fluoridation
movement.

The NZ public, and local councils, deserve better than this scientific dishonesty and jacked-up review panel.

This review demonstrates why it is so important that councillors hear both sides of the evidence, not just one, as they did in
New Plymouth and Hamilton. It also shows why fluoridation promoters are so scared of councils receiving such balanced
information they vote to reject fluoridation as a result, if they have the political courage.

It is far from a REALLY critical review of the literature. It is NOT a meta analysis. It is no better scientifically than a
dentist's review that is rubber stamped by uncritical referees and published in a profluoridation dental journal.

Read the full story at: Scoop

The Hypnotic Power Of Germ Propaganda
September 12 2014 | From: JonRappoport

When perverse elites are building a false matrix for the masses, its always wise to find the elites
most basic assumption and question it.

Time and time again, over the years, we hear about new germs and old germs and mystery germs that are afflicting
people, suddenly, in various parts of the world.

And this news is met with nearly universal faith. Yes, there must be a germ. It must be whats making people ill. When
researchers speak about the germ, they are correct and truthful.

Really? Why? Who said so?

I took my first serious germ-foray, when I was writing my book, AIDS Inc., in 1987. To my shock, I discovered that, even by the
conventional rules of disease-causation, there was no reason to infer that something called HIV was causing something called
AIDS.

Going a step further, I investigated every so-called high-risk group and found non-germ causes that accounted for all the
symptoms of what was being called AIDS.

Without HIV as the lynchpin welding all these risk-groups together, AIDS was immune-system failure resulting from a variety
of causes. Not one cause.

For example: T-cells are significant troops in the immune-system army. The biggest reason for T-cell depletion on the planet?
Malnutrition.

The last time I looked, malnutrition is not a germ.

AIDS Inc. is replete with illustrations of germ-touting that turn out to be irrelevant.

But people are fascinated by germ-stories. They love them, they fear them, they add their own wrinkles, they behave as if
theyre in a theater watching a horror movie.
When the dreaded SARS epidemic made global headlines in 2003, the germ was the coronavirus. Of course, SARS turned
out to be a dud. As a horror movie, it didnt deliver. Too few people died.

Frank Plummer, a Canadian microbiologist working for the World Health Organization, achieved a few moments of honesty
when he told reporters that, strangely enough, he was seeing fewer people with SARS who had the coronavirus. Eventually,
Plummer said, almost none of the people being diagnosed with SARS had the coronavirus.

Which is exactly like saying, Theyre all suffering from disease X, except none of them have what causes disease X.

A contradiction. Garble. Gibberish.

Six years later, in 2009, there was the fabled Swine Flu H1N1 pandemic, another dud.

Sharyl Attkisson, writing for CBS, and Peter Doshi, writing at BMJ Online, exposed the Swine Flu fraud: most people across
the US who were likely Swine Flu cases didnt have the H1N1 virus. Thats what lab tests revealed.

Read the full story at: JonRappoport

Environmental Lawyer Talks About Wifi In Schools

September 10 2014 | From: Youtube

This talk is a presentation by Environmental Lawyer Sue Grey, LLB(Hons), BSc (Microbiology and Biochemistry), RSHDip PHI
and concerned mother of three, to the Taikura Rudolf Steiner School in Hastings, New Zealand - 7 August 2014
Vaccine Fraud? What About Psychiatric Fraud? Staggering
September 9 2014 | From: JonRappoport

This is an article about the intentional construction of false reality.

Not a minor constructiona huge, enduring, institutional, wing-flapping, money-munching, poison-dispensing, Matrix-welding,
yet humanity-saving invention.

In the wake of CDC whistleblower William Thompsons confession that he buried a vaccine-autism connection, some people
reacted with shock - as if this was the first case of rank fraud that had ever taken place within the hallowed halls of medical
research.

How about a whole branch of modern medicine that is a fraud from top to bottom?

Let us turn the page to Psychiatry. And the lying liars who lie about it. Most Americans dont have a clue about the way
psychiatry actually works or its pose of being a science.

The public hears techno-speak and nods and surrenders.

If psychiatrists are experts on the human mind, mice can navigate the Arctic in canoes. But psychiatrists are educated to be
able to talk a good game. And politicians are more than happy to mouth vagaries, and consign the problems of society to
mental-health professionals.

It turns out that the phrase mental health was invented by psyop specialists, who needed to create an analogy to physical
well-being. They needed to, because:

THERE ARE NO DEFINITIVE LABORATORY TESTS FOR ANY SO-CALLED MENTAL DISORDER.

And along with that:

ALL SO-CALLED MENTAL DISORDERS ARE CONCOCTED, NAMED, LABELED, DESCRIBED, AND CATEGORIZED by a
committee of psychiatrists, from menus of human behaviors.

Their findings are published in periodically updated editions of The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM), printed by the American Psychiatric Association.

Of course, pharmaceutical companies, who manufacture highly toxic drugs to treat every one of these disorders, are leading
the charge to invent more and more mental-health categories, so they can sell more drugs and make more money.

But we have a mind-boggling twist. Under the radar, one of the great psychiatric stars, who has been out front in inventing
mental disorders, went public. He blew the whistle on himself and his colleagues. And for years, almost no one noticed.

His name is Dr. Allen Frances, and he made VERY interesting statements to Gary Greenberg, author of a Wired article:
Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness. (Dec.27, 2010).

Read the full story at: JonRappoport

The Health & Healing Benefits Of Organic Sulphur (Sulfur): MSM

(Methylsulfonylmethane)
September 7 2014 | From: NaturoDoc / NaturalNews

Imagine a nutrient more important to health than magnesium, zinc, iron, copper, sodium, iodine-and,
for that matter, many vitamins. Assume that it has incredibly diverse roles, boosting resistance to
disease, helping regulate blood sugar, preventing aches and pains, and even holding your skin and
organs together.

It's a nutrient so essential for life that you would die without it. But get this: it has been all but ignored by dietitians,
physicians, and researchers.

The nutrient is sulfur, a yellow mineral referred to as brimstone in the Bible and used medicinally for thousands of years.

Flip through most nutrition textbooks, and you'll discover that sulfur is hardly ever mentioned, despite it being the third most
abundant mineral (after calcium and phosphorus) in the body, accounting for 1 percent of your weight.

Mel Werbach, MD, author of the Textbook of Nutritional Medicine (Third Line Press, 1999), sees sulfur as a blind spot in
nutrition and medicine:
 "The value of sulfur supplementation has been poorly investigated," he observes, "even though sulfur baths and
injections are old-fashioned arthritis treatments which are still popular in many countries."

When Rockefeller, Du Pont and their other 'elite' family interest cronies decided they needed to increase their profits and
control the world's usage of fertilizer, they convinced the farmers that the petro-chemical fertilizers [derived from the
Rockefeller-controlled U.S. oil companies] would enable them to spend more time farming instead of spreading manure.

And what a load of manure it was. Bogus, co-opted "science" that was bought-and-paid for; that served as a pre-cursor to the
now proven 'GMO' catastrophy pushed by other Rockefeller-controlled companies - such as Monstanto, that attempt to
ruthlessly force on the whole world to this day.

Now, the likes of Monsanto are spending literally hundreds of millions of dollars fighting to not have to identify GMO
ingredients on food labelling - because the people are waking up to these Franken-foods that are making everyone sick and
die, while profits soar.

When will we reach a critical mass of farmers and the general public who wake up and who are capabale of having the spine
to stand up to these corporate criminals?

But it is okay, we are told by these globalist criminals who, unthinkably to most - have infiltrated far enough into agribusiness and agricultural education,
that the indoctinates actually believe that we need to spray this petrochemical shit onto our crops. If this was necessary the human race would have
become extinct on this planet a long, long time ago

What the infromed Rockefeller / Du Pont type special interest groups never told anyone was that the petro-chemical fertilizers
would kill all the sulfur in the soil that the manure facilitated and by doing so, the people would be deprived of the essential
nutrient that the manure provided and illness would abound.

And just who are the people that own the pharmaceutical companies that make the [again petro-chemical derived] 'drugs' that
supposedly address these health issues?

Are you connecting the dots yet?

The Cellular Matrix Sulfur Study: Results of an experimental study using Organic Sulfur

The Cellular Matrix Study (referred to here as "The Sulfur Study") was organized in 1999. This study was inspired by a fatal
type of breast cancer, a type of germ cell reproductive cancer that had been reported to respond to organic sulfur.

While researching this cancer, it became obvious that the sulfur cycle plays an important role in the regeneration of our cells.

The Study also found that the use of chemical fertilizers had effectively broken the sulfur cycle in countries that use these
fertilizers.
Diseases we hadnt even heard of have become typical, cancer has grown at an unprecedented rate, and the quality of our
food has been greatly diminished. Is there a correlation here?

Since 1954, rates of disease in the U.S. have gone up approximately 4,000 percent. And in 1954, chemical fertilizers were
mandated by our government.

Fertilizers such as ammonium nitrates and sulfates, which lack bioavailability, appear to have broken the sulfur cycle.

This appears to have contributed to the decline of our health, wealth, mental acuity, and quality of life. We believe that when
the Study is completed, it will clearly demonstrate a connection between the lack of sulfur and the inability of cells to
regenerate in a healthy manner.

Linus Pauling said that all modern diseases can be attributed to a mineral deficiency. Though Pauling is best known for his
work with vitamin C, his statement was about minerals. Most researchers say that sulfur is one of the most important of the
trace minerals, around the fourth to sixth most important.

What Sulfur Does

Sulfur enables the transport of oxygen across cell membranes, and oxygen is necessary for healthy cellular regeneration in
mammals. Plants, on the other hand, require carbon dioxide for cell regeneration, and plants can store sulfur, while man
cannot. Man eliminates carbon dioxide, and plants eliminate oxygen.

Thus, the sulfur cycle is symbiotic and vital for life as we know it.When many health professionals are asked about sulfur, they
state as if reading from a cue card, "We get all the sulfur we need from the food we eat."

That was true until man decided to change the way we grow our food and what we feed our crops.

In 1920, Otto Warburg began his study of cancer in both plants and man, for which he received a Nobel Prize in 1931.

He proved that cancer in man is anaerobic. Anaerobic, by definition, is cellular metabolism without oxygen.

"Cancer" in plants is linked to too much intracellular oxygen, or aerobic metabolism. The use of a gas we are intended to
eliminate for cellular regeneration is not a healthy program for plants or man.

Why Most MSM Supplements Don't Work

The Studys initial research of organic sulfur had its participants go to the store to buy MSM (methylsulfonylmethane).
But what we hoped to observe did not coincide with what the literature said about MSM. Except for gastrointestinal
improvements, our initial group had little improvement.

When we found an article about the 16 "deadly" additives found in MSM - the anti-caking additives, we realized why our early
participants were not reporting any health improvements. These additives benefit only the packaging industry; our health is
apparently a lesser concern to them.

Sulfur, with an atomic number of 16, is known to bond with almost every other mineral.

Sulfur has demonstrated its ability to detoxify heavy metals in conjunction with the transport of oxygen across the cell
membrane, thus allowing regeneration. Sulfur is also the key player as a precursor for the utilization of amino acids, the bodys
building blocks. Of all of the amino acids, some 70 percent are sulfur-based.

This detoxification cannot happen with MSM that contains anti-caking ingredients, because these excipients block the
bioavailability of sulfur to the cells.

The same thing happens when organic sulfur is released into the ocean, or evaporates and falls with rain - that sulfur is bound
up by the chemical fertilizers as sulfites and sulfates.

It soon became clear that the Study had to find a pure, uncontaminated form of MSM. After a thorough search, we believe we
have found it in the form of Organic Sulfur - coarse crystal flakes which are fresh from the precipitator and have had no further
processing.

This Organic Sulfur is supplied to the members of the Study, and we follow them with photographs of their faces in an effort to
observe the cellular regeneration they experience.

The photographic followup, the newest aspect of the Study, is too recent in its implementation to be able to share the results.
However, the reports on health, diet, and medications have been very interesting.

As in the beginning of the Study, many of these participants had been taking MSM in tablet or capsule form for many years.

Our efforts to find a pure form of MSM was worth the effort, as their responses have clearly indicated.
Preliminary Findings

We are seeing cellular regeneration in the face photographs of our Study participants, but it takes up to seven years to
regenerate all the cells in the body when the cells are healthy. Damaged cells from trauma or chemical processes cannot
regenerate unless the ability to transport of oxygen across the cell membrane is functioning.

Oxygen is a large molecule, so nutrient uptake is also improved when the cell membrane becomes pliable and healthy. The
purity of the sulfur is an important factor.

Old scar tissue and various types of fibroids have been reported to resolve. This is an example of cellular regeneration in cells
that have been scarred and unable to regenerate over the years following a trauma.

The skin is the largest organ in the body, and it's like a huge kidney or lung. Sulfur is known as "the beauty mineral," and what
we really are saying is that the skin is more beautiful if its cells are able to regenerate.

The skin is the backup for the liver, and someone in liver distress shows it in the cells of their face and skin. When the internal
filters are working well, the extracellular fluids are not polluted and the immune system is allowed to protect the body from
infections.

Lab and clinical data have not been made available from the doctors or clinics who have seen our Study members. However,
we can report the following dramatic examples of cellular regeneration.

Examples of Cellular Regeneration:

Cancer is an anaerobic condition by definition. Study members who had cancer and used chemotherapy who took 30
grams of sulfur during the chemotherapy had no side effectsthere was no hair loss, nausea, or diarrhea. There was,
however, a surprisingly greater reduction of cancer cells counts, as reported by their oncologists. Lymphomas have been
responding to Organic Sulfur both in decreased pain and decreased size of tumors.

Arthritis: Organic sulfur, by comparison to commercially available MSM, is a remarkable mineral for arthritis, and produces
the effects which have been reported. Those who had been taking Organic Sulfur reported much less pain and increased
mobility. Many reported the straightening of finger joints, along with the resolution of internal scar tissue around the joints.

Osteoarthritis has been reported to respond to the ingestion of organic sulfur. As can be observed in old photographs of
our relatives prior to 1960, most people were not bent over prior to the historical breakdown of the sulfur cycle through fertilizer
use.

Osteoporosis has also been addressed, though the numbers are too few to be significant. Bone density tests are
demonstrating reversal of bone thinning, or loss of bone density.

Skin conditions including acne, psoriasis, rosacea, toenail fungus, burns, liver spots, and disorders associated with Lupus
Erythematosus have been eliminated. Sulfur can be used both internally and externally, but the cells which demonstrate the
problem originate from the endothelial layer of the skin, which is better addressed by internal use.

Cardiovascular: The results which were the most startling was the number of open-heart procedures which had been
scheduled and were subsequently cancelled when the individuals EKG returned to normal. This happened in as little as six
weeks of ingesting Organic Sulfur. 54 cases like this have been reported. Our blood vessels also regenerate, and we believe
that these cancelled surgical procedures could be an example of such regeneration. The group has also seen the reduction of
scar tissue, high blood pressure, and the breakdown of calcium plaque in the arteries. Thus, we believe organic sulfur would
be likely to benefit Alzheimers sufferers as well.

Diabetes is helped, because sulfur is necessary in the production of insulin as well as other sulfur-based amino acids
necessary for the metabolism of carbohydrates.

Gastrointestinal disorders including acid indigestion, GERD, irritable bowel syndrome, leaky gut, and chronic constipation
have been addressed with a dosage of organic sulfur at 1 rounded teaspoon per 100 pounds of body weight twice daily. Other
digestive disorders such as ulcerative colitis and Crohns Disease have not been observed to date, but we feel that the
symptoms found in the literature will be alleviated with the use of sulfur.

Liver: One of our members regenerated his liver after suffering 25 years from Hepatitis C, after 15 months of taking two
tablespoons of organic sulfur twice a day.
 Parasites find that the lining of the stomach and intestines too "pliable or slippery" to sink their hooks into.

Migraines and headaches have been alleviated. Migraines seem to take longer than other types of headaches, and the
sulfur can often can produce a migraine which then may require more sulfur to address the possible detoxification process that
is occurring.

ADD, ADHD, hyperactivity, depression, and mood swings are greatly relieved with the use of organic sulfur. Organic
sulfur acts as a stabilizer or mood elevator and relaxes the nervous system. We have reports of people getting off
antidepressants and Ritalin within as little as three days of starting to take Organic Sulfur. Those who had been on
antidepressants for a long time took a little longer. The ability of the body to produce its own glutathione appears to be the
reason.

Respiratory: Just as impressive were the Study members who were suffering from lung dysfunctions such as allergies,
asthma, and emphysema. Those with more serious conditions stopped depending upon the bottled oxygen they had been
carrying around, in spite of the fact that they might have continued smoking.

Glaucoma relief has been reported by Dr. Eldon Haus, MD and by a few members of the Study. It appears that there is
regeneration of the cells of the "drainage" system of the trabecular meshwork at the inner base of the iris. Subjects who suffer
from increased intraocular pressure found that the drops they used to control their eye pressure often inhibited their ability to
drive or read, where sulfur has not demonstrated any such corneal disturbance.

Hair: Gray- and white-haired members have experienced a return to their natural color hair. The natural color that gradually
returns to the nape of the neck indicates the regeneration of the pigment glands at the base of the hair follicle. (NaturoDoc
Note: Reversal of hair loss is also being reported by our users.)

Teeth and gums: The power of oxygen may be best demonstrated in its ability to eradicate gum disease. Organic sulfur,
when used as an additive to toothpaste or tooth powder, appears to eliminate the plaque buildup on the teeth, but more
importantly, it appears to regenerate the gums and "tighten" previously loose teeth.

Cellular Regeneration Requires Oxygen Transport Across Cell Membranes

Cellular regeneration appears to be closely tied to the body's ability to transport oxygen across cell membranes. As stated
earlier, this is a primary function of organic sulfur.

A study of the periodic table of elements shows sulfur, selenium, and tellurium as being the only three oxygen transport
minerals. Further study shows that chlorine and fluorine are detrimental to such oxygen transport, yet these elements have
been added to make our teeth "healthier" and our water "more pure" or free from bacterial infestation.

These elements are poisonous at higher concentrations, and they block the uptake of both oxygen and sulfur. Drinking city tap
water is discouraged in the Study for this reason.

The Study believes that a widespread deficiency in the mineral sulfur may be responsible for the great increase in disease in
the U.S. Healthy cellular metabolism is the basis for cellular regeneration of all of our cells. This is the bottom line for the
human body. Without intracellular oxygen, we begin to degenerate long before our biological clock runs out.

We began life as a single cell, and from that one cell we have made and regenerated all the cells of our body in a healthy
manner, unless that regeneration is stymied by the food we eat.

Since 1954, our food supply has been devoid of sulfur, thanks to the use of chemical fertilizers and the overprocessing of our
foods.
Unfortunately, our woold is not planning to cease the use of these profitable chemicals, which involve commercial
agribusiness, medicine, insurance, as well as genetic and designer foods. However, we can regenerate our internal sulfur
cycle with organic sulfur, provided that this sulfur compound has not suffered the same indignities of science that our food
supply has and continues to suffer.

Finland, alarmed over the increasing disease rate of its population, took a hard look at chemical fertilizers and banned all of
them, fearing the levels of cadmium.

They were not aware of the sulfur connection or Krebs cycle. Since doing so, they have become a leading supplier of "Bio-
Friendly" or completely organic foods in Europe. They have also seen their disease rates drop to one tenth of the 1985 levels.

In 1985, the U.S. was at the same marked disease level as Finland. Why are we not following suit and banning all chemical
fertilizers? It appears that the epidemiology of those countries using chemical fertilizers have an increase in disease, while
those that use organically based fertilizing methods do not.

Organic sulfur is a food, not a drug. Organic Sulfur is not stored in the body and it is considered to be nontoxic.

Attempts to kill mice, rats, and Oregon State Death Row inmates failed to reach a toxic level even at 200 grams or almost half
pound a day.

Since 1999, there have been 1,100 members of the Study, and new participants are welcome. The Study is based upon and
supported solely by this work. If you would like to become a participant in the Study, please contact:

Cellular Matrix Study

Phone: +1 801-290-2013 (U.S.)

Email: organicsulfur@sisna.com

So, the 21 reasons to add organic sulfur to your daily regimen are as follows:

1. Organic sulfur is not a drug or prescription medicine, but rather a nutrient that the body is deprived of.

2. It increases enzyme production within the glands of the body, substantially increasing resistance to illness.

3. It increases flexibility in the tissues within the body and increases blood circulation.

4. It reduces muscle and joint inflammation, promotes healing in the muscles and joints and prevents them from becoming
sore. To the degree there is soreness, recovery and return to normality is quickened. Athletes, in particular, benefit from this
as the intake of OS dramatically increases their recovery time.

5. It eliminates "free radicals" in the body. Allergies to pollens ad certain foods can be eliminated or reduced by its use.
 6. It promotes healthy, increased growth of hair and fingernails.

7. Because of the oxygenation of the cells and tissues that the OS facilitates, the body is kept in a constant aerobic
environment making it so that cancer cells cannot survive or exist.

8. Studies have shown it can help reverse symptoms of osteoporosis, Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

9. It aids in healthy skin production and the reduction of "wrinkles". It is one of the main ingredients in moisturizing creams.

10. It helps the body properly regulate insulin production. Adequate OS in the diet may reduce the amount of insulin
injections.

11. It helps alleviate chronic headaches and migraines. Increased circulation in the brain cells promotes proper blood
circulation within the brain. Less pressure and pain result, reducing tendencies for headaches.

12. It helps alleviate emphysema by providing the body with material to manufacture new, healthy cells on lung walls.

13. Because of the ability to make cell walls more permeable. OS causes the body to rapidly release and reduce alcohol
"hangover" toxins, removing them as waste from the body. The process quickens recovery time from a "hangover", often as
quickly as 20 minutes.

14. It helps in reducing and often eliminating diverticulitis. Parasites living in the intestines are unable to remain attached to
the walls due to the slippery coating that the OS produces. Because of this, hatching parasitic worms are flushed out as well
because they cannot attach to the walls.

15. It reduces hypoglycemia in the body because it has made it easier for the body to introduce blood sugar through more
permeable cell walls. Less insulin is demanded for the process, resulting in less overuse of the pancreas. Within several
months of constant usage, OS can reduce or eliminate hypoglycemia entirely.

16. It helps alleviate PMS. Glandular production is enhanced by OS to have more "normal" levels of production. Acid,
enzyme, and hormonal levels are more evenly balanced facilitating reduction of cramps, headaches, and nausea associated
with the monthly cycle.

17. It helps promote better kidney function more efficiently. Water retention problems associated with poor kidney function
can be alleviated.

18. It can help alleviate eye problems. Dissolve 1 teaspoon of the sulfur crystals in 4 ounces of water and use as eye drops
as frequently as you like.

19. OS delivers the essential omega-3 throughout the body and also allows the body to produce vitamin B-12.

20. It has amazingly reversed countless cases of asthma and 18 cases of autism that we know about so far.

21. Last and certainly not least, it eliminates the continued need for Viagra or Cialis by reversing erectile dysfunction.

What's Really In Vaccines?

September 6 2014 | From: Infowars

Why This infographic from Infowars is pertinent on the heels of the ongoing saga of the CDC
scientist-whistleblower that recently announced it was known by the CDC that the MMR vaccine can
cause Autism and they covered it up:
Related: Healing from Vaccine Injuries through Homeopathy

Lemon And Baking Soda: A Miraculous Combination That Is 10,000 Times Stronger
Than Chemotherapy
August 31 2014 | From:SecretlyHealthy

Why do not we know about this? Because there are organisations which don't have an interest in
letting us know about the miraculous properties of lemon. You can now help people by sharing this
article.

Do you know how many people die while this secret is jealously kept in order not be threatened the interests of big
corporations?

Lemon has already been proven to have strong anti - carcinogenic properties. In addition to this there are many other useful
properties. Lemon has strong effect on cysts and tumors.

This fruit can cure cancer, it is tested on all types of cancer; and if you add baking soda would be even better, because it will
normalize the pH of the body.

Lemon has a very strong antimicrobial effect with a very broad spectrum of activity against bacterial and fungal infections.

Lemon is effective against internal parasites and worms, it regulates blood pressure and is a powerful antidepressant, plus it
reduces stress and nerve crises.
What is very interesting is the source of this information:

It comes from one of the largest manufacturers of drugs, which says that after 20 laboratory tests conducted since 1970 until
now is proved that:

Lemon destroys carcinogenic cells in 12 types of cancers. Lemon prevents the spread of carcinogenic cells and
has 10,000 times stronger effect of drugs like Adriamycin, chemotherapy and narcotic products.

And what is even more interesting - this kind of treatment with extract of lemon and baking soda, only destroys carcinogenic
cells and does not affect healthy ones.

Patients should drink two teaspoons of lemon juice with a half of teaspoon of baking soda. And of course, this does not cure
the terrible side effects of chemotherapy.

It is best to plant a lemon tree into the pot in order to be sure that lemon would be organic, no chemicals. Organic lemon is 100
times more efficient than lemon grown with chemical fertilizers and sprayed with chemicals.

Debt, Vaccines And Food As A Weapon:

When International Aid Is Used For Population Control
August 27 2014 | From: TruthStreamMedia

No strings attached? Yeah, right. Heres a rundown of some of the major ways that international
loans are used to control entire populations.

Those seeking dominance wield control in modern society largely through the manipulation of finance and
economics.

Power over entire countries comes not only through the debts themselves, but through the conditionalities tied to the financial
agreement, as is done regularly by the IMF, World Bank and other aid programs. Notoriously, many locales - free in name -
have been brought under the yoke of international domination, altering the shape of its development and its population.

Heres a look at how the dangerous agendas tied to these loans have been used to takeover regions around the world for the
benefits of the ruling global corporations.

From: Truthstream News #2: How the Globalists Are Raping Africa (and the Rest of the World, Too):

One overt example comes from John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, who claims that he was as an
international agent of influence, to convinced leaders of developing nations to accept enormous development loans from
institutions such as the World Bank, the IMF, USAID and others.

These loans then gave leverage that effectively forced leaders to capitulate to political pressure and outside meddling.
According to Perkins, these economic hitmen use extortion, sex and murder as well as the manipulation of documents,
elections or official data to tilt the outcome desired by the lenders.

GMO Food Aid

In 2002, several needy nations in southern Africa including Zambia, Zimbabwe and Mozambique controversially
rejected food aid, despite being in the middle of a famine, because it was comprised of genetically modified crop staples.
Leaders in these countries questioned the safety of biotech foods, expressed suspicions about hidden risks as well as
contamination. The diplomatic row stirred emotions, with one supposedly anonymous USAID official telling the Africans
beggars cant be choosers. But should even the poorest nations be forced to accept food they consider tainted?

In U.S. occupied Iraq, an agricultural program was instituted under Paul Bremers 100 Orders that essentially forced
farmers to use registered seeds controlled by biotech. It mandated a policy of Plant Variety Protection (PVP) that
clearly favored corporate giants like Syngenta and Monsanto, while making it difficult or impossible to use heirloom seeds
traditionally saved by farmers since the early days of the Fertile Crescent threatening the biodiversity and heritage of the
regions rich agricultural history.

This was complicated by the Inma Agribusiness Program, overseen by USAID and operated by members of Norman Borlaug
Institute for International Agriculture of the Texas A&M System, who implemented new CAFO lots (Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operations) to bring red meat cattle industries to the war torn nation, along with new fisheries and other mass
produced food facilities.

Monocrops of corn and soy were raised in Iraq to feed these livestock, much of which was genetically modified. USAID
program guides (dated 2007) even advised Iraqi farmers on the use of Syngenta brand pesticides.

Economic Shock Therapy

Shock therapy was implemented on various economies through Latin America, Russia and Eastern Europe under the
banner of neo-liberalization, where sudden shifts to a market economy caused severe disruption and destabilization in the
lives of the poorest.

According to Naomi Kline, author of The Shock Doctrine, the hallmarks of economic Shock Therapy were implemented under
warped, hyper-capitalism where transitioning markets were effectively pirate-ized (rather than privatized). Actions included
structurally adjusted mass-privatizations, government deregulation, unrestricted free market access for foreign corporations,
and deep cuts in social spending with repressive laws, harsh crackdowns and torture.

Her colleague, Nobel Prize winner in economics, Joseph Stiglitz, who has held top positions at the World Bank, said:

There was another kind of shock therapy, which was a dramatic change in society, changing from a socialist
economy, a communist economy, into a market economy by overnight privatizing, liberalizing, changing the rules of
the game overnight rather than the gradual approach of changing one thing after another.

"You had asset stripping. You had the undermining of the basic social fabric of society. You didnt have growth; you
had decline. You had increase in poverty rather than the fruits that capitalism was supposed to bring.
 For Argentina, in the late 90s and early 2000s, it was hyper-inflationary debt, exacerbated by sharply increased rates by
the Federal Reserve, at a time when wage drops led to government revenue drops and subsequent debt shortfalls. This was
all complicated by IMF loans and their associated agenda.

IMF Riots

Greece: The consequences of the 2008 global economic crisis forced governments to bailout banks over risky loans and
other side effects; many countries were devastated, with some of the worst fell on Greece, which not only threatened to drag
down the rest of Europes economy with it, but led to violent unrest, new draconian leadership, and austerity, heavy debt and
pushbacks in the average living standard for the population. IMF agreements controversially set in place job cuts, particularly
in the public sector, a drop in the minimum wage and severe slashing to the budget for retirement and other benefits, all of
which triggered shock and anger in the society.

Debt Traps For Struggling Countries

Jamaica + IMF Debt: The documentary Life + Debt profiled Jamaicas long struggle to overcome a first, a struggling
developing economy, then sagging debt under an IMF loan, and further by the crippling conditions under the loan that forced it
to import food, adjust agriculture to global preferences while out pricing Jamaica farmers, creating factory jobs with sweatshop
conditions and even importing pools of cheap Chinese labor to the islands semi-autonomous Free Trade Zone. The effects
of this crushing debt and its draconian influence over development has stunted opportunity for ordinary people in Jamaica for
decades to come. Yet, these patterns of exploitation mirror the loans given to developing countries across the globe.

Read more: The Center for Economic and Policy Research The Multilateral Debt Trap in Jamaica

Privatising Water, Putting A Price on Life

Bolivia 2000: Protests and riots resulted in the major metropolitan area of Cochabamba as a result of IMF and World Bank
orders to privatize the municipal water supply. A contract was handed over to the firm Aguas del Tunari (owned in part by the
San Francisco-based contractor Bechtel) who denied people access to water, and even reportedly used militarized riot police
to prevent the collection of rain water during its harsh transition to a (corporatized and captured) market economy.

Even after immense backlash, the World Bank supported corporate privatization of the water, stating that no subsidies should
be given to ameliorate the increase in water tariffs in Cochabamba also stating that poor governments are often too plagued
by local corruption and too ill equipped to run public water systems efficiently. [and that the use of private corporations]
opens the door to needed investment and skilled management. Aguas del Tunari was eventually forced to give up and leave
the country.

Spread Of Disease During Disaster Relief

Haiti: Post-earthquake relief in 2010 by international organizations led by UN peacekeepers resulted in the spread of
cholera to Haitian residents, killing thousands. Vengeful and suspicious of the source, lynchmobs killed Voodoo priests and
angrily protested the United Nations encampments, casting blame on these sources. A scientific investigation indeed proved
that a UN camp had supposedly-unintentionally spread the disease through a contamination wastewater source, resulting in
lawsuits. As of April 2014, the U.N. is still struggling to contain the spread of cholera, making for a volatile destrucive force in
the already poverty stricken and disaster ravaged island nation.

In Wake Of Polio Vaccine, 47,500 Cases Of Non-Polio Patalysis

Pakistan, India and Polio Vaccines: Despite the fact that the World Health Organization recorded no new cases of polio in
India for 2012, signaling its rapid disappearance as a major threat, the private foundations led by the Bill & Melinda Gates
foundation were aggressively vaccinating millions upon millions of children in India and Pakistan.

Doctors Pulliyel and Vashisht conducted a study finding that in 2012 with no cases of polio approximately 47,500 children
were diagnosed with non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP), which is twice as deadly as polio, in the areas where the oral
polio vaccine was administered.

Suspicion, Backlash Against Vaccines: Beware Of Those Bearing Gifts

 With distrust and concerns about Western-led vaccination efforts in Pakistan following revelations that U.S. intelligence
used a fake vaccination program in a sting to hunt Osama bin Laden, Pakistan Taliban groups were blamed for killing
several vaccine workers and bombing vaccination vans in 2012.

In 2013, at least 9 vaccine workers were shot in Nigeria. These deaths closely followed reports that at least 40-50 children
were paralyzed in Chad, Africa from Gates-foundation backed Meningitis shots in late 2012.

Covert Infertility From Vaccines?

1994-96 Phillipines: Tetanus vaccines supplied by a World Health Organization-sponsored vaccine effort were found to
be tainted with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), correlating with numerous reports of terminated pregnancies and
spontaneous abortions. Necessary for a healthy pregnancy, hCG becomes an anti-fertility agent when carried by the tetanus
vaccine, which produces antibodies against hCG when tetanus antibodies are also produced.

The BBC reported in 1995:

Women should have been told that the injection would cause miscarriage and, in the end, infertility. The
Department of Health should have asked beforehand, so that only those who didnt want to have children had the
injection. I really hope and pray to God that I will still have a baby and get a normal pregnancy. And I am still
hopeful that the Department of Heath will find an antidote to the antibodies as well.

It during the mid-1990s that an anti-fertility vaccine for women was announced that used human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)
growth hormone in a tetanus vaccine to trigger an immunoresponse against the pregnancy.

As Jurriaan Maessan uncovered;

The work on LHRH and HCG vaccines was supported by research grants of The Rockefeller Foundation.

Food As A Weapon Of Depopulation

In 1974, Henry Kissinger issued the then-secret NSSM 200, a National Security Memo identifying 13 key countries where
the use of food as a weapon was desired to contain overpopulation (supposedly a top threat to U.S. national security). India
was at the top of the list.

Food-For-Coercive Sterilisation Scandals: India's Great Emergency

India: Food aid delivered to India through USAID since at least the Johnson Administration has included population control
and family planning efforts.

This pressure peaked during the 1975-77 Emergency under Indira Gandhi where the government, backed by international
aid organizations, forcibly sterilized more than 8.3 million low caste Indians primarily women, but also many men in
notorious medical camps. Included in this horror, are reports of systematic abuse, with incentives for turning people in for
sterilization and even grabbing people off the street.

These efforts were led by Indiras son Sanjay Gandhi (incidentally, these leaders were from the Nehru family and not related to
Indias founding father Mohatma Gandhi, but used his name in the quest for power).

Please watch Melissa Meltons intensely researched report on coercive population control measures in India, using food [and
other incentives] as a weapon.

Globalist Eugenics Population Control Plan Exposed in India

See articles for further reading visit: TruthStreamMedia

Mobilize - Finally A Documentary Depicting The Dangers Of Cell Phone Radiation

August 25 2014 | From: CollectiveEvolution

Cell phone use is only a couple of decades old, and just like anything else we use in this world,
revelations regarding their use have not been properly examined and studied until now.
Also see: Telstra warning on how to reduce exposure to electromagnetic energy freaks out customers

The use of cellular phones has become the norm today for people of all ages, using it to stay connected and keep in
touch with friends and family. Almost everyone you see today has a cell phone. Thats why its so important to share
documentaries like this one which are just starting to surface.

For example, a study conducted by the Massachusetts Aggression Reduction Center (MARC), which included over 20,000
children/ teens between grades 3 and 12, concluded that approximately 20% of grade 3 students already owned a cell phone.
The numbers steadily rose from that point forward to approximately 25% in grade 4, 39% in grade 5 and 83% in middle school.
You can read that entire study HERE.

So what have we found? Multiple studies have revealed that cell phone radiation can cause cancer. Did you know that The
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radio frequency fields (including those from cell phones) as a
possible cause of cancer in 2011? (1)

The dangers of cell phone use gained a lot of mainstream credibility in 2011 when the World Health Organization (WHO)
admitted that cell phone radiation may cause cancer. The statement was based off of a cumulative decision made by a team
of 31 scientists, from 14 different countries, after reviewing evidence that suggested this to be the case. You can read more
about that HERE.
Its great to see films like this getting ready to surface, the film is the trailer to Mobilze, a documentary that is set for release in
September 2014.

Cell phones are very valuable devices and they are two wave microwave radios that should not be held directly
next to the brain and body. A cell phone is a very weak form of microwave radiation, its not as powerful as an oven,
but it has a very similar frequency and some of us are using it for thousands of minutes and month right next to our
brain. - Dr Devra Davis of Environmental Health Trust. (source)

Fluoride Free New Zealand: Dirty Science

August 24 2014 | From: Scoop

Last week we had Dirty Politics this week we have Dirty Science. A review of fluoridation
published yesterday (22nd August) was chaired by committed fluoridationists Professors Peter
Gluckman and David Skegg.

Both of these men had already hung their hat on the fluoridationists mantra of safe and effective.
Also see: Major Harvard Study Published in Federal Govt Journal Confirms Fluoride Lowers IQ

It is obvious that this review was set up to allay the growing public concern and awareness that fluoride does cause
harm, rather than actually deal with science. This was PR not science, in other words, dirty science.

Last year Prof Gluckman issued an advisory stating that the science was settled and two weeks ago he said on Radio NZ
that the Review would be looking at "what we know about the safety and efficacy of fluoride in water." He didnt say they would
be examining the research that shows that fluoride is harmful and perhaps not even effective.

Less than two years ago, Prof Skegg claimed that there was no new evidence to require a review of fluoridation, in spite of the
two most prestigious international reviews in history (The York Review 2000 and the National Research Council 2006) saying
there was a dire need for better scientific information.
The NZ expert panel included people who were already known to be in ardently favour of fluoridation and not one single
person who is known to be opposed, or even someone neutral.

These included, notably, Gregory Seymour who, as Head of the Otago Dental School, refused the Dental Students
Associations request to hear scientific evidence against fluoridation on campus by an international expert, and Murray
Thomson, who is the Editor of the NZ Dental Journal and author of pro-fluoridation papers. It was therefore already a forgone
conclusion.

One surprise is that the review has gone so far as to claim that fluoridation works systemically (i.e. by swallowing) before teeth
erupt. This belief was not only scientifically discredited 15 years ago by the US Public Health Services Centers for Disease
Control, but has also been acknowledged as wrong in court in sworn affidavits by Health Ministry representatives and is
contrary to what the top consultant to the Ministry of Healths National Fluoridation Information Service told the Hamilton City
Council last year.

The Gluckman-Skegg review does not cite a single piece of research showing adverse health effects from fluoride, out of the
dozens provided to the Royal Society in 2012, and the hundreds, if not thousands, in existence.

This review should be viewed against the recent background of the Health Minister of Israel banning fluoridation last week and
the admission by Dr Michael Beasley, the Deputy Director of the NZ National Poisons Centre, that the jury is still out
regarding fluorides claimed safety, and yet another international study showing that fluoridation reduces IQ.

This joins 47 other studies, ignored by the Gluckman-Skegg review, against the bogus Dunedin IQ study which does not
identify individual fluoride exposure, but which is quoted in the summary as if it was one of the most important studies.

The reality is that this kangaroo review is just a finger in the dyke, trying to hold back the inevitable demise of
this failed policy. The weight of scientific evidence is that fluoridation is not only ineffective, it poses major health
risks, as known since the 1940s.

Fluoride Free New Zealand calls for an independently chaired open public discussion of all the science about
fluoridation.

Mainstream Media Television Channel Reports The Truth About MMS

August 22 2014 | From: Youtube

What a breath of fresh air to finally see a National TV station reporting the truth about MMS and what
it is doing to help people worldwide! This video of MMS helping a cancer patient was sent to us by
our Bishop Maria Angelica Acosta Correa in Chile.
She has been helping people in Chile with Sacramental Protocol Guidance for a few years now. Maria and her husband
Francisco attended our Genesis II Church seminar in Bogota, Colombia last year.

After which, they organized a Genesis II Church Seminar in Santiago where we had 79 students attend! Maria Angelica has
been sending us video testimonies from some of the many they are guiding to restored health. Jim and I are looking forward
to the seminar that is being organized in Chile this fall.

Could you imagine if this information about MMS was shown on CNN, Fox News or the BBC in Great Britain? The world would
welcome it and look for ways to get it and use it. This will never happen because of the following reasons:

1 . First of all, it is illegal for a Registered doctor in the US to recommend an alternative medicine or therapy until the patient
has had 10 years of conventional approved therapy or face legal persecution

2. The same people that make the drugs that are a scourge on people worldwide are the same people that control the
media, i.e. main stream T.V., newspapers and magazines.

3. Billions are given in pay offs to ensure that ONLY their drugs are approved when they know that at best they only treat
symptoms and will never cure any dis-ease because that is not where the money is found.

4. The FDA will now fast track a drugs approval in less than a year with a 200 million dollar registration fee or better said,
pay off without any clinical trials! So to get a alternative therapy that is safe and cures approved is too expensive to afford
and keeps these real cures out of reach of the people of this world. And if there are bad reactions and even deaths form the
new approved drug the company is given an exemption from persecution.

5. More than 80% of the FDA directors go on to work for the Big Pharma when they leave their jobs at the FDA? Well,
what does that tell you? Who were they representing while working at the FDA, us or the people they go on to work for after
their time at the FDA? The FDA only represents those that have paid to be approved.

6. Most all of the books used to teach medical students in universities worldwide are either written or heavy influenced by
the pharmaceutical companies that produce the drugs the future doctors will promote to their patients? Just look into who
produces the two books that doctors use every day in their practice to prescribe medications to their patients. The Physicians
Desktop Reference Guide or PDR, and the Merck Manual are written by the producers of the approved drugs.

Source: CDC and NIH directors now working for Big Pharma

Source: Vaccine-nation by Andreas Moritz

Source: Big Pharmas Evi Motives Exposed

Source: Silent epidemic: The Untold Story of Vaccines Movie

So, knowing this, there is no surprise to see TV commercials that advertise drugs that cause all kinds of side effects,
including death, but, never hear anything about alternative therapies that completely cure with little or no side effects.

The companies that promote their FDA approved drugs admit that their drugs only treat symptoms and are not a cure! In
fact, these companies have available other approved drugs to treat the side effects from other drugs they produce. It is a
vicious circle of deceit and cunning business skills to entrap the worlds population by fear.

Fear that if they dont follow what the Doctors prescribe they will be overcome with disease. In other words, they want us to
believe that the world needs the Medical and Pharmaceutical industry to stay healthy and enjoy longevity, when just the
opposite is true!

For a TV Channel to report what has happened to people using MMS shows us that these people in Chile are free to report
what they want.

Breaking: MMR Vaccine, Autism, CDC Coverup

August 22 2014 | From: JonRappoport

Senior government scientist breaks 13 years silence on CDCs vaccine-autism fraud.

Related: Healing from Vaccine Injuries through Homeopathy

Related: U.S. Media Blackout: Italian Courts Rule Vaccines Cause Autism
CDC research scientist comes forward, anonymously, comes clean, tells Dr. Brian Hooker that the CDC has known about the
MMR vaccine connection to autism for at least 11 years.

Has known, and has intentionally covered it up.

The CDC and the US government have gone to extreme lengths to assert there is no vaccine-autism connection.

This CDC scientist has spoken with Brian Hooker, a PhD in biochemical engineering, many times.

Hooker states he has seen raw CDC data not included in any study. And the data show that:

African-American boys who receive their first MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine before the age of 36 months have a
300% increased risk for autism.

If this is true, what else is the CDC hiding?

From the Age of Autism article (8/18):

Dr. Hooker has worked closely with the CDC whistleblower, and he viewed highly sensitive documents related to
the [fraudulent government] study via Congressional request from U.S. Representative Darrell Issa, Chairman of
the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

The CDC documents from Congress and discussions that Hooker had with the whistleblower reveal widespread
 manipulation of scientific data and top-down pressure on CDC scientists to support fraudulent application of
government policies on vaccine safety.

If all this is true, then the CDC has stood by for the last decade and done nothing, while the MMR vaccine has damaged the
brains of many, many children.

You may recall that Dr. Andrew Wakefield pointed out a likely connection between the MMR vaccine and autism. British
authorities and the CDC destroyed his career.

Wakefield now states:

Over a decade ago, Dr. Scott Montgomery and I put forward a hypothesis for MMR vaccine and autism: the age
you receive the vaccine influences the risk. We shared this hypothesis with vaccine officials, members of the
Centers for Disease Control, at meetings in Washington, D.C. and Cold Spring Harbor.

A group of senior vaccine safety people at the CDC studied it. It panned out. We were rightat least partly. By Nov
9, 2001, nearly thirteen years ago, senior CDC scientists knew that the younger age exposure to MMR was
associated with an increased risk of autism. In 2004 they published, but they hid the results.

There is another angle on all this. It has to do with how diseases and disorders are labeled and defined.

There is no definitive test for autism. The criteria for diagnosis are a menu of behaviors. Therefore, we are looking at a wide
net which includes all sorts of brain and neurological damage.

Official studies are done which show that some cases of whats called autism are not preceded by vaccinationand
therefore, vaccines couldnt be the single cause of the single disease called autism.

That proof, of course, is completely false - because whats called autism isnt a single disease. Its neurological damage, which
can have a number of causes.

And now we are looking at one of those causes: the MMR vaccine.

If in the coming days, the CDC claims theyve already eliminated the possibility that vaccines are the cause of autism, youll
understand their shell game, their con, their ruse.

Theyve stacked the deck, so they can roll out so-called cases of autism which have no connection to the MMR vaccine.

Its hoax by labels and semantics.

While vaccines continue to damage the brains of children.

Vaccine-Autism Connection: US Congressman Stonewalled By CDC

August 22 2014 | From: JonRappoport

With a CDC whistleblower standing in the shadows, claiming the CDC has known about the vaccine-autism connection for 10
years, the cover-up is threatening to blow sky-high.

And now Florida Congressman Bill Posey has sent me a statement about his experience with the CDC.

Posey has been trying to obtain specific data about a 2004 CDC study which claimed the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella)
vaccine has no role in causing autism.
The CDC whistleblower (so far, anonymously) has been pointing to that 2004 study as a fraud, claiming vital data were
omitted, data which would indict the vaccine.

So how has the CDC responded to Poseys inquiry and request for all the 2004 data?

Here is what he wrote to me:

The CDC has refused for more than six months to hand over documents I requested concerning this issue. That is
not the type of response we expect from our government.

What??

A US Congressman wants research data from a federal agency and they flat-out refuse.

Nothing much is a stake hereonly the health of the entire US population. Vaccines causing autism? And the CDC has the
right to keep as many secrets as it wants to?

Did the CDC wake up one morning and decide its the CIA? On what grounds is it refusing to release the data? National
Security?

Here is what the CDC whistleblower (a research scientist still employed by the CDC) states: intentionally omitted data from the
2004 study shows that: African-American boys who receive their first MMR vaccine before the age of 36 months have a 300%
increased risk of developing autism.

Presumably, this is what Congressman Posey would learn if the CDC turned over the data to him.

And who knows what else he would learn?

My comment about the CDC thinking its the CIA isnt entirely facetious. In 1987, I confirmed that, routinely, certain CDC
employees are sent to Langley, Virginia, for CIA training, and return with top-secret classificationsmeaning they can access
data that are off-limits to the rest of the CDC and most of the federal government.

Data confirming extensive and ongoing damage caused by vaccines might indeed rate as classified, National Security, if by
Security you mean protecting vaccine manufacturers and their government allies.

As opposed to protecting the public.

Secret Fluoridation Review Totally One-Sided Admits Chair

August 16 2014 | From: Scoop

The secret review of water fluoridation will only look at research that supports fluoridationists
belief in the safety and efficacy of fluoride in water, says Sir Peter Gluckman, co-chair of this
thereby-admitted kangaroo review
It is no wonder that scientific studies showing water fluoridation is neither safe nor effective have not been sought
for this bogus review.

Even the Ministry of Health admits there is robust scientific research against the claimed safety and effectiveness of
fluoridation. But only under the Official Information Act. Publicly it denies this admission. Who could possibly trust these
people?

The US National Research Council Review, published in 2006, raised major concerns about toxic health effects of fluoride at
levels in NZ drinking water. The NZ Ministry of Health ignores this finding. Only recently, another scientific study showed
fluoride reduces IQ, adding to the prestigious Harvard meta-analysis of international studies.

In the US a recent press release stated "A series of disclosures are surfacing about the actions of water fluoridation
promoters that point to a likely tsunami of Fluoridegate investigations, hearings, and explosive courtroom
entanglements.

Tennessee state legislator Frank Niceley states, "There is a real Fluoridegate scandal here. Citizens haven't been
told about harm from fluorides

Washington D.C. toxic tort attorney Chris Nidel says, "I think when we look back we'll ask why Fluoridegate didn't
surface earlier. There are serious concerns about possible conflict of interest and heavy editing of information being
fed to the public about fluoride risks and impacts."

Does this sound warning bells about this kangaroo review by Gluckman and the Royal Society sure does! Against this
background, this secret review is extremely alarming a review by committed fluoridationists who deny the published
science that fluoridation is not just ineffective, it is a serious health risk. The NZ public deserves better. The NZ public must
demand better. Unless we are no more than sheep.
Fluoridation is a crime against humanity. Those who seek to force it on the population need to be held criminally liable. This is
especially true of those, like Gluckman, who abuse the trust that the public place in them, believing them to be objective
scientists, when they are no more than fanatics pursuing a quasi-religious crusade on this issue.

Toxins In Personal Care Products

August 13 2014 | From: MindBodyGreen

An interesting look at what you may be absorbing without being aware of it. Click the image for a larger version.
Pandemic Profits Exposed: Follow The Money On Ebola, FDA And Big Pharma
August 6 2014 | From: Infowars

The open borders offer many potential crises for the government to exploit

The open borders offer many potential crises for the government to exploit a population bomb, terrorism, drug cartel
violence and pandemics are all imminent possibilities.

Reports Of Illness Prompt Audit Of Smart Meter Radiation

July 17 2014 | From: HeraldSun

An independent audit of electromagnetic radiation from smart meters will begin next month as critics claim reports of
illness from hundreds of Victorians represent an emerging health crisis.
More than 250 Victorians have contacted Stop Smart Meters Australia to report insomnia, headaches, ringing in the ears,
tiredness and burning or tingling sensations.

Adverse reactions to smart meter emissions have also resulted, for some, in loss of employment, social
dislocation, and unwanted family separations, it says in a letter to the State Government.

Independent electromagnetic radiation tests at 55 properties are due to start late next month.

Energy Minister Russell Northe said: The Government expects that smart meters will be shown to operate well within the
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency standard.

Electromagnetic emission rates from the smart meters will be compared with those from other devices such as mobile phones,
microwave ovens, televisions, wi-fi routers and computers.

A similar, smaller 2011 study found emissions were well within the accepted safety standard.

Notices for Refusing Installation of "Smart" Meters

From: StopSmartMetersNZ

Notice Refusing Consent For Installation Of Smart Meter (for electricity)

This is a template letter that you may choose to personalise and send to your electricity retailer to inform the
company that you refuse consent for the installation of a smart meter.

Notice Refusing Consent For Installation Of Smart Meter (for water)

 A trial of smart water meters is due to start in Tairua on the Coromandel Peninsula. if you do not want to be part of
this trial, below is a template document that you can personalise send to the Thames-Coromadel District Council to
advise them of this fact.

Ninth Grade Girls Show Plants Wont Grow Near Wi-Fi Routers
July 14 2014 | From: TheSpiritScience

Ninth-graders design science experiment to test the effect of cellphone radiation on plants. The
results may surprise you.

Five ninth-grade young women from Denmark recently created a science experiment that is causing a stir in the scientific
community.

It started with an observation and a question. The girls noticed that if they slept with their mobile phones near their heads at
night, they often had difficulty concentrating at school the next day. They wanted to test the effect of a cellphones radiation on
humans, but their school, Hjallerup School in Denmark, did not have the equipment to handle such an experiment.

So the girls designed an experiment that would test the effect of cellphone radiation on a plant instead.

The students placed six trays filled with Lepidium sativum, a type of garden cress into a room without radiation, and six trays of
the seeds into another room next to two routers that according to the girls calculations, emitted about the same type of
radiation as an ordinary cellphone.

Over the next 12 days, the girls observed, measured, weighed and photographed their results. Although by the end of the
experiment the results were blatantly obvious the cress seeds placed near the router had not grown. Many of them were
completely dead. While the cress seeds planted in the other room, away from the routers, thrived.

The experiment earned the girls (pictured below) top honors in a regional science competition and the interest of scientists
around the world.

According to Kim Horsevad, a teacher at Hjallerup Skole in Denmark were the cress experiment took place, a neuroscience
professor at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, is interested in repeating the experiment in controlled professional scientific
environments.

WiFi in schools proven dangerous

You might want to consider moving your router at least 2 rooms away from where you sleep.

New Study Could Spell The End For Diet Soda And Aspartame
July 11 2014 | From: WeSupportOrganic

As concerns about health epidemics plague the nation, demand and sales of diet soda have plunged as consumers
try to make better choices. As we reported yesterday, aspartamethe main sweetener for diet sodais one of the most
dangerous ingredients used in our food supply, causing seizures and a host of other health issues.

Related: Why Aspartame is the Most Dangerous Substance Added to Our Food Supply

In a new study done over ten years and sampling 60,000 women, it was shown that women who drink two or more diet drinks
a day have much higher cardiovascular disease rates and are more likely to die from the disease.

In the largest study done of its kind, The University of Iowa concluded:

[C]ompared to women who never or only rarely consume diet drinks, those who consume two or more a day are
 30 percent more likely to have a cardiovascular event [heart attack or stroke] and 50 percent more likely to die from
related disease.

This is one of the largest studies on this topic, and our findings are consistent with some previous data, especially
those linking diet drinks to the metabolic syndrome, says Dr. Ankur Vyas the lead investigator of the study.

The association persisted even after researchers adjusted the data to account for demographic characteristics
and other cardiovascular risk factors, including body mass index, smoking, hormone therapy use, physical activity,
energy intake, salt intake, diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol, and sugar-sweetened beverage intake.

On average, women who consumed two or more diet drinks a day were younger, more likely to be smokers, and
had a higher prevalence of diabetes, high blood pressure, and higher body mass index.

Thankfully this study comes on the heels of reports of already slipping sales of diet soda, one of the largest aspartame
markets.

According to Time Magazine:

One reason for the decline could be a growing awareness of the obesity epidemic in the US and growing health
concerns surrounding sugar-sweetened beverages.

According to Reuters, industry experts say the beverage industry is shrinking under the scrutiny. Even diet-branded
drinks have suffered a loss of sales with concerns over artificial sweeteners.

Whatever the reason for the decline, this new study should only add fuel to the movement away from artificial sweeteners.
There are plenty of natural sweeteners that people can choose that are much healthier than aspartame. Click here for a
practical guide to natural sweeteners.

Another important note is that the overall sales of soda going down also means that less people are being exposed to (mostly
GM) high fructose corn syrup which carries a whole host of health risks as well.

Scientists Blow The Lid On Cancer & Sunscreen Myth

July 11 2014 | From: TheUnboundedSpirit

According to a June 2014 article featured in The Independent (UK), a major study conducted by researchers at the
Karolinska Institute in Sweden found that women who avoid sunbathing during the summer are twice as likely to die
as those who sunbathe every day.
The epidemiological study followed 30,000 women for over 20 years and showed that mortality was about double in women
who avoided sun exposure compared to the highest exposure group.

Researchers concluded that the conventional dogma, which advises avoiding the sun at all costs and slathering on sunscreen
to minimize sun exposure, is doing more harm than actual good.

Thats because overall sun avoidance combined with wearing sunscreen effectively blocks the bodys ability to produce
vitamin D3 from the suns UVB rays, which is by far the best form of vitamin D.

In the USA, vitamin D deficiency is at epidemic levels. Ironically, vitamin D deficiency can lead to aggressive forms of skin
cancer. A ground-breaking 2011 study published in Cancer Prevention Research suggests that optimal blood levels of vitamin
D offers protection against sunburn and skin cancer.

Additionally, vitamin D protects the body from diseases like multiple sclerosis, rickets (in the young), tuberculosis, inflammatory
bowel disease, type 1 diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and
Sjogrens syndrome.

According to the Vitamin D Council, researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham recently reported that lack of sun
exposure may lead to cognitive decline over time.

A dissident dermatologist

Bernard Ackerman, MD, (deceased 2008) was one of the worlds foremost authorities on the subject of skin cancer and the
sun, sunscreens and melanoma skin cancer risks.

Below are Ackermans views excerpted from an article in The New York Times (July 20, 2004), titled I BEG TO DIFFER; A
Dermatologist Whos Not Afraid to Sit on the Beach:
The link between melanoma and sun exposure (dermatologys dogma) is unproven.Theres no conclusive evidence that
sunburns lead to cancer.There is no real proof that sunscreens protect against melanoma.Theres no proof that increased
exposure to the sun increases the risk of melanoma.

A 2000 Swedish study concluded that higher rates of melanoma occurred in those who used sunscreen versus those who did
not.

Sunscreens: Cancer-Causing Biohazards

Elizabeth Plourde, PhD, is a California-based scientist who authored the book Sunscreens Biohazard: Treat as Hazardous
Waste, which extensively documents the serious life-threatening dangers of sunscreens not only to people but to the
environment as well.

Dr. Plourde provides proof that malignant melanoma and all other skin cancers increased significantly with ubiquitous
sunscreen use over a 30-year period. She emphasizes that many sunscreens contain chemicals that are known carcinogens
and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDC).

Environmentally, she notes: In areas where there has been much exposure to ED [endocrine disrupting] chemicals, coral and
other sea populations have died off and the prevalence of dual-sexed fish has risen.

Dr. Plourdes research on mice and sunscreen exposure also showed increases in both pup and maternal mortality as well as
reproductive issues in subsequent generations.

Additionally, the book documents how sunscreen chemicals have polluted our water sources including oceans, rivers and
municipal drinking water. Worse yet, testing revealed that 97% of Americans have sunscreen chemicals in their blood!

Dr. Plourdes book also has a chapter on the importance of vitamin D3 to health, and she posits that the widespread vitamin
D3 deficiency is linked to overuse of sunscreen combined with sun avoidance in general.

Is Wi-Fi Bad For Our Health?

June 19 2014 | From: 7News
While radiation waves Wi-Fi emits are very low, some scientists fear it is damaging our health. Pippa Gardner reports.

Click here to watch the video on 7News.

Jenny McCarthy Talks To CNN On How She Cured Her Sons Autism Caused By
Vaccinations
June 16 2014
Jenny McCarthy talks about how she cured her son from Autism created by unsafe vaccinations

Top Biochemist Calls To Abolish Smart Meters, WiFi In Schools, And Baby Monitors
June 1 2014 | From: WakingTimes

Our modern world is creating an electromagnetic soup filled with electrical pulses, radio
frequencies, computer screens, wireless signals, as well as personal devices such as cell phones
and gadgets that are emitting damaging radiation.
There are many peer-reviewed scientific studies drawing conclusions that should concern us all, but particularly for young
children and pregnant women. Government agencies are even doing battle amongst themselves over outdated scientific
information that still impacts current regulations.

Recently, neuroscientist and professor, Olle Johansson, PhD, offered a comprehensive view of the many issues surrounding
EMFs, including an industry-wide attempt by telecom to cover up the negative consequences. It is a must-see lecture that can
be viewed here.

Adding further credence to the dangers of EMFs, another well-regarded scientist who has eight international awards for his
work, Prof. Martin Pall, a Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University, is
also calling for action against common emitters of electromagnetic pollution. In the video below, you will hear how he goes so
far as to say that these devices are a biohazard which need to be abolished.

As Dr. Pall mentions, there are actually 20,000 scientific papers that acknowledge the potential harm from EMFs
there should be none.

Among the well-documented effects of exposure are:

Oxidative stress.
Single strand breaks in cellular DNA.
Double strand breaks in cellular DNA.
Cancer.
Male and female infertility.
Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier.
Loss of melatonin (which has been shown to lead to a reduction in bone density -Ed.) + Consequent sleep disruption.
Effects on brain and heart function.
Possible link between increased prevalence of EMF radiation and rise in autism.

So, as you can see, this is a full-spectrum assault on the human organism which, further, can lead to ongoing generational
effects. Serious indeed.

For the full story and the video interview with James Rickards visit: WakingTimes
CODEX Alimentarius: The Monstrously Toxic Power Play For Control Of The Global
Food Supply & Natural Health Industry
May 29 2014 | From Various Sources

The Codex Alimentarius agenda, which has long metastasised in the recesses of closed board rooms and governmental
chambers, is now coming to light. This is the paramount issue of our times, yet few know about it.

www.codexalimentarius.org

'If Codex standards ever replace the current laws governing food and dietary supplements, it will affect everyones' right to
choose supplements, but our right to grow crops with untampered seeds, to buy pure organic food, and to live free of the
tyranny of Big Agro-Chem-Pharma-Med, through health-destructive local governemtn health departments rules enacted and
enforced by a pro-corporate government that cares nothing about our health freedom.'

Although localised legislation does not seem to be of concern to their agenda: See the videos below with regards as to how
the World Health Organisation has back-doored this via international 'law'.

In other words, the "natural health" industry will perish. Now more than ever, we must exercise our democratic duty and be
vigilant in protecting that freedom, the health and survival of the Earth, and all her creatures and citizenry.

Codex Alimentarius is not just about nutritional supplements, although that is an important aspect. In fact, it is the primary
political battlefield where the war is being waged about who will regulate and control the global food supply, from field and
stable to table. This "war" is being waged by an increasingly tangled web of global governmental and international authorities,
aligned with big business and financial interests, wherein human health takes a back seat to profit and power goals.

The Codex Alimentarius (Latin for "food code" or "food book") is a collection of internationally recognized
standards, codes of practice, guidelines and other recommendations relating to foods, food production and food
safety. Its name derives from the Codex Alimentarius Austriacus.

Its texts are developed and maintained by the Codex Alimentarius Commission, a body that was established in
1963 by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization
(WHO).

The Commission's main aims are stated as being to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair practices in the
international food trade. The Codex Alimentarius is recognized by the World Trade Organization as an international
reference point for the resolution of disputes concerning food safety and consumer protection.

The Codex Alimentarius officially covers all foods, whether processed, semi-processed or raw, but far more
attention has been given to foods that are marketed directly to consumers.

In addition to standards for specific foods, the Codex Alimentarius contains general standards covering matters
such as food labeling, food hygiene, food additives and pesticide residues, and procedures for assessing the safety
of foods derived from modern biotechnology. It also contains guidelines for the management of official (i.e.,
governmental) import and export inspection and certification systems for foods.

- Dr. Rima E. Laibow, MD.

There is an entire industry with an innate economic interest to obstruct, suppress and discredit any information about the
eradication of diseases. The pharmaceutical industry makes over one trillion dollars each year from selling drugs for ongoing
diseases. These drugs may relieve symptoms, but they do not cure - because they are not designed to.

We do not have a healthcare system, we have a sickness industry.

We have to realise that the mission of this industry is to make money from ongoing diseases. The cure or eradication of a
disease leads to the collapse of a multi-billion dollar market of pharmaceuticals, run by a eugenics directive.

The New Zealand Government met with strong moves to quash the original "Restrict Home Grown Food: Food Bill 160-2" of
2011. However, a 'revised' version was rushed through into legslation on May 28, 2014.

Part of the Codex Alimentarius worldwide rollout is a real trojan horse. While some politicians dismiss the truth of this, the
framework for the worst case scenario is now written into legistlation.

Baumand College / National Association of Nutritional Professionsals Presentation with Dr. Laibow

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Further Reading:

EducateYourself.org

NaturalHealthInformationCentre.com

NaturalNews

Food Bill Passes Into Law

May 28 2014 | From: Scoop

A new food regulation bill a decade in the making has passed with general support. The third
reading of the Food Bill was completed on a voice vote.
Nikki Kaye said the bill had been ten years in the making and would reduce compliance costs while ensuring greater food
safety. It put in place a risk based system.

The original bill went through a major rewrite and was sent back to select committee after a backlash from many people who
said it was over prescriptive and excessive.

Labours Damien OConnor agreed the bill has been through a lengthy gestation, but the law was vital to New Zealands food
production which drove the economy. A risk based system could work, but it was vital it was properly regulated and monitored.

GMO Producers Should Be Punished As Terrorists, Russian MPs Say

May 17 2014 | From: RT

A draft law submitted to the Russian parliament seeks to impose punishment up to criminal
prosecution to producers of genetically-modified organisms harmful to health or the environment.
The draft legislation submitted on Wednesday amends Russia's law regulating GMOs and some other laws and provides for
disciplinary action against individuals and firms, which produce or distribute harmful biotech products and government officials
who fail to properly control them.

At worst, a criminal case may be launched against a company involved in introducing unsafe GMOs into Russia. Sponsors of
the bill say that the punishment for such deeds should be comparable to the punishment allotted to terrorists, if the
perpetrators act knowingly and hurt many people.

When a terrorist act is committed, only several people are usually hurt. But GMOs may hurt dozens and hundreds.
The consequences are much worse. And punishment should be proportionate to the crime, co-author Kirill
Cherkasov, member of the State Duma Agriculture Committee told RT.

Russian criminal code allows for a punishment starting with 15 years in jail and up to a life sentence for terrorism.

Less severe misdeeds related to GMOs would be punishable by fines. For instance the administrative code would provide for
up to 20,000 rubles (US$560) in fines for failure to report an incident of environmental pollution, which would also cover
harmful GMO contamination, if sponsors of the bill have their way.

Russia gave the green light to import of GMOs and planting of bioengineered seeds as part of its accession to the WTO, but
the Russian government remains skeptical of GMOs. In April, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev announced that his cabinet will
postpone the beginning of certification of GMO plants for growth in Russia due to lack of proper infrastructure needed to test
their safety.

The government also opposes imports of GMO food, saying the country has enough farmlands to provide enough regular food
to feed itself.

But the new draft legislation, even if adopted, would be difficult to enforce in practice. Proving a direct link between certain
GMOs and health or environmental problems could be difficult, considering that harmful effects, if they manifest, may take
years to become apparent.

Critics of the draft bill also point out that it fails to suggest amendments to laws regulating textile production and
pharmaceutical industry, both of which have been using genetically-altered products for years.
 The global pharmaceutical industry uses GMOs much wider than food industry does. And there is the question,
who should be punished in this case producers of medicines which are used to treat people, or those who want to
ban them, commented Aleksandr Korbut, vice-president of the Russian grain union, to Izvestia newspaper.

First United Nations WHO Report On Antibiotic Resistance Reveals Serious Threat To
Global Public Health
May 2 2014 | From: Scoop

UN Report Reveals Serious Threat To Global Public Health - Which is interesting as the WHO along
with the Pharmaceutical industry were instrumental in promoting the known, dangerous use of anti-
biotics; in order to aid the implementation of their Agenda 21 world depopulation nightmare.

The WHO: The globalist - fascist entity which the world has to thanks for bringing us Geo-engineering and .Chemtrails'. The WSDO (World Sickness
and Depopulation Organisation) would be a far more accurate descriptor

Antibiotic resistance when bacteria change so antibiotics no longer work in people who need them to treat infections is now
a major threat to public health, says a new United Nations report released today.

The study, produced by the UN World Health Organization (WHO), is the first to look at antimicrobial resistance, including
antibiotic resistance, globally, and provides the most comprehensive picture to date, incorporating data from 114 countries.

It reveals that this serious threat is no longer a prediction for the future; it is happening right now in every region of the world
and has the potential to affect anyone, of any age, in any country, WHO pointed out in a news release.

Without urgent, coordinated action by many stakeholders, the world is headed for a post-antibiotic era, in which
common infections and minor injuries which have been treatable for decades can once again kill, said Keiji
Fukuda, WHOs Assistant Director-General for Health Security.

Effective antibiotics have been one of the pillars allowing us to live longer, live healthier, and benefit from modern
medicine, Dr. Fukuda noted.

Unless we take significant actions to improve efforts to prevent infections and also change how we produce,
prescribe and use antibiotics, the world will lose more and more of these global public health goods and the
implications will be devastating.
While the report notes that resistance is occurring across many different infectious agents, it focuses on antibiotic resistance in
seven different bacteria responsible for common, serious diseases such as bloodstream infections (sepsis), diarrhoea,
pneumonia, urinary tract infections and gonorrhoea.

The results are cause for high concern, according to WHO, which documented resistance to antibiotics, especially last resort
antibiotics, in all regions of the world.

For example, resistance to one of the most widely used antibacterial medicines for the treatment of urinary tract infections
caused by E. coli fluoroquinolones is very widespread. In the 1980s, when these drugs were first introduced, resistance
was virtually zero. Today, there are countries in many parts of the world where this treatment is now ineffective in more than
half of patients.

WHO said that people can help tackle resistance by using antibiotics only when prescribed by a doctor; completing the full
prescription, even if they feel better; and never sharing antibiotics with others or using leftover prescriptions.

Health workers and pharmacists can help tackle resistance by enhancing infection prevention and control; only prescribing and
dispensing antibiotics when they are truly needed; and prescribing and dispensing the right antibiotic(s) to treat the illness.

The report, which is kick-starting a global effort led by WHO to address drug resistance, reveals that key tools to tackle
antibiotic resistance, such as basic systems to track and monitor the problem, show gaps or do not exist in many countries.
While some countries have taken important steps in addressing the problem, every country and individual needs to do more.

Other important actions include preventing infections from happening in the first place through better hygiene, access to
clean water, infection control in health-care facilities, and vaccination to reduce the need for antibiotics. WHO is also calling
attention to the need to develop new diagnostics, antibiotics and other tools to allow healthcare professionals to stay ahead of
emerging resistance.

Russia Completely Bans GMOs - It's Official

April 18 2014 | From: CollectiveEvolution
Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev recently announced that Russia will no longer import GMO products, stating that the nation
has enough space, and enough resources to produce organic food.

If the Americans like to eat GMO products, let them eat it then. We dont need to do that; we have enough space and
opportunities to produce organic food. Medvedev

Russia has been considering joining the long list (and continually growing) of anti-GMO countries for quite some time now. It
does so after a group of Russian scientists urged the government to consider at least a 10-year moratorium on GMOs to
thoroughly study their influence on human health.

It is necessary to ban GMOs, to impose moratorium (on) it for 10 years. While GMOs will be prohibited, we can plan
experiments, tests, or maybe even new methods of research could be developed. It has been proven that not only in
Russia, but also in many other countries in the world, GMOs are dangerous.

Methods of obtaining the GMOs are not perfect, therefore, at this stage, all GMOs are dangerous. Consumption and
use of GMOs obtained in such way can lead to tumors, cancers and obesity among animals. Bio-technologies certainly
should be developed, but GMOs should be stopped. We should stop it from spreading.

Irina Ermakova, VP of Russias National Association for Genetic Safety

A number of scientists worldwide have clearly outlined the potential dangers associated with consuming GMOs. I recently
published an article titled 10 Scientific Studies Proving GMOs Can Be Harmful To Human Health, you can read that in full
here. These are just a select few out of hundreds of studies that are now available in the public domain, it seems that they
continue to surface year after year.

Russia completely banning GMOs, such a large, developed nation is a big step forward in creating more awareness with
regards to GMOs. Ask yourself, why have so many nations banned GMOs and the pesticides that go with them? Its because
evidence points to the fact that they are not safe, they are young, and we just dont know enough about them to safely consume
them. They just arent necessary, so why produce them?

Within the past few years, awareness regarding GMOs has skyrocketed. Activism has played a large role in waking up a large
portion of Earths population with regards to GMOs. People are starting to ask questions and seek answers. In doing so, we are
all coming to the same conclusion as Russia recently came to.

In February, the State Duma introduced a bill banning the cultivation of GMO food products. President Putin ordered that
Russian citizens be protected from GMOs. The States Agricultural Committee has supported the ban recommendation from the
Russian parliament, and the resolution will come into full effect in July 2014.

This just goes to show what we can do when we come together and demand change and share information on a global scale.
Change is happening, and we are waking up to new concepts of our reality every day.

GMOs are only the beginning, we have many things to rid our planet of that do not resonate with us and are clearly
unnecessary. We are all starting to see through the false justifications for the necessity of GMOs, no longer are we so easily
persuaded, no longer do we believe everything we hear and everything were presented with. Lets keep it going!

To read the original story with links: CollectiveEvolution

Mother Reverses Autism Symptoms In Daughter By Eliminating MSG From Diet

April 3 2014 | From: NaturalNews

A biochemist located in the San Francisco Bay Area believes that she has drastically improved, if not cured, her
daughter's autism through eliminating monosodium glutamate, or MSG, from her diet.

Katherine Reid, Ph.D., says her daughter Brooke began exhibiting symptoms of autism at age two. Brooke's communication
capabilities were far below average, and she failed to develop normal human connections. She also suffered from tantrums
and digestive complications including constipation.
 Dr. Reid's husband, a cellular biologist, became suspicious
of his daughter's symptoms and began researching, only to
find that Brooke was showing nearly every characteristic of
autism.

After seeing their pediatrician, who also agreed that

something was wrong, the family hired a psychologist to
test Brooke's learning abilities. The results were
devastating in that they showed that she suffered
immensely from severe learning disabilities, ultimately
diagnosing her with moderate autism.

"She was in her own world," Dr. Reid said. "Her actions
were repetitive, like doing a puzzle over and over again for
hours. And she exhibited signs of obsessive-compulsive
disorder. She couldn't stand going home in the stroller on a
different route without having a screaming tantrum."

Soon, most of Dr. Reid's free time was dedicated to

researching autism and the struggles that other families
were experiencing. Through her research, she learned that
many children suffering from the disorder had improved
symptoms after altering their diets to exclude MSG, gluten
and dairy products.
Natural versus man-made

While glutamate, a naturally occurring amino acid, is produced by our bodies and found in many protein-rich foods, including,
meat, vegetables, dairy, eggs, fish and poultry, MSG is derived from the synthetic processing of glutamate. In 1908, MSG was
developed by a Japanese man for the purpose of enhancing flavor in food. He later went on to form Ajinomoto, the world's
leading MSG producer and, ironically, also a drug company.

Our bodies require glutamate for learning and developmental processes. The amino acids in glutamate are the building blocks
of proteins, subsequently responsible for metabolism and brain function.

Alarmingly, today the rate of autism found in American children is 1 in 50, a number that's increased 200-fold since the 1940s.
Autism is typically described as a developmental disability that can be mild or severe and is caused by genes that impact the
nervous system. Children suffering from this disorder fail to develop adequate social skills required to function normally in the
world.

After Dr. Reid learned that naturally occurring glutamate was responsible for transmitting signals between neurons and other
cells, she felt that an imbalanced diet filled with MSG could be worsening her daughter's symptoms, and potentially even the
cause of them.

Despite a lack of studies for various reasons, it seems plausible that consuming large amounts of a genetically altered version
of the amino acid responsible for our speech and communication abilities could be tied to autism.

With MSG in nearly 95 percent of processed foods, and often unlabeled, Dr. Reid knew that it wouldn't be easy eliminating it
from Brooke's diet; however, she was willing to try.

Despite skepticism from the medical community regarding the link between autism and MSG, Dr. Reid withdrew MSG from her
daughter's diet and began seeing improvements in just five weeks.

"I tried the experiment on her and myself, and she started to develop better speech and communication. She became more
social, her repetitive behaviors never occurred again after we introduced the diet. She just became a little more physically
coordinated," Dr. Reid explained to Fox News. "I was also feeling much healthier myself. I had less sinus pressure headaches,
less allergies. So I could see how this could have an effect on her brain."

Moved by her daughter's transformation, Dr. Reid created a non-profit organization called Unblind My Mind, dedicated to
raising awareness regarding the link between foods we eat and growing health ailments. She is now an advocate for treating
medical complications with diet first and is focused on educating others regarding the impacts of proper nutrition and
eliminating toxins like MSG.
Read the full story at: NaturalNews

Take Back Your Power - Full Documentary

April 2 2014 | From: TakeBackYourPower

The 2013 NSA spying scandal exposed vast programs to monitor personal communications. Now, utilities and governments
are reaching into your own home, through fast-tracked "smart" meters and spy-ready technology. But what if you have a
choice? At stake is in-home surveillance, skyrocketing bills, emerging health risks and hacking vulnerabilities.

With compelling insight from whistleblowers, government agents, lawyers, environmentalists & doctors, the award-winning
Take Back Your Power takes us on a journey to expose corruption and erosion of rights in the name of "smart" and "green."
What you'll discover will surprise, unsettle and empower you.

Druglawed N.Z. Film Trailer

April 2 2014 | From: Druglawed

DRUGLAWED: The documentary that exposes how New Zealand Green got rolled up in the U.S. Drug War

Documentary release 4.20.2014

Updates And New Resources From StopSmartMeters.org.nz

April 1 2014 | From: StopSmartMeters

The link below is to a discussion of a report produced by the Electric Power Engineering Centre (EPEC) which electricity
companies often use as evidence that "smart meters" are "safe". As you can read at the link below, the EPEC report has now
been de-bunked by Dr Don Maisch who visited NZ last year ( see this link ) and gave lectures on the "smart meter" issue.

You can read Dr Maisch's critique here.

The following link discusses how the American Academy of Environmental Medicine has called for a moratorium on "smart
meter" installations due to concern about the adverse health effects. Click here.

The following link here relates the experience of an Australian mother who became ill after the installation of a "smart meter" at
her home. It is very relevant to NZ, as her horrendous (and ongoing ordeal) could have been prevented had she put a lock on
her meter box to prevent the installation of a "smart meter". Click here.
 Notices for Refusing Installation of "Smart" Meters

From: StopSmartMetersNZ

Notice Refusing Consent For Installation Of Smart Meter (for electricity)

This is a template letter that you may choose to personalise and send to your electricity retailer to inform the
company that you refuse consent for the installation of a smart meter.

Notice Refusing Consent For Installation Of Smart Meter (for water)

A trial of smart water meters is due to start in Tairua on the Coromandel Peninsula. if you do not want to be part of
this trial, below is a template document that you can personalise send to the Thames-Coromadel District Council to
advise them of this fact.

Doctor Glidden Exposes The 97% Failure Rate Of Chemotherapy Along With
Pharmaceutical Co. Kickbacks To Prescribing Doctors - It's All About The Money
March 31 2014 | From: iHealthTube

Dr. Peter Glidden talks about the incredibly low success rate for chemotherapy as a cancer treatment. Be sure to talk to your
doctor about all of your options before deciding on a cancer treatment path.

Dr. Glidden is an outspoken advocate of Wholistic Health. For more than two decades, he has been treating people with
Naturopathic therapeutics including Homeopathy, Heavy Metal Chelation, Herbal Medicine and Bio-identical Hormone
Supplementation.

See the article below for alternatives to Chemotherapy

Cancer Treatment Alternatives To Radiation And Chemotherapy

March 29 2014 | From: CollectiveEvolution

In the United States there are only two approved treatments for cancer radiation and chemotherapy. Despite the fact that
chemotherapy fuels cancer growth and kills the patient more quickly, nothing has changed.
 Despite numerous alternative treatments that are now coming
to the forefront, the medical industry continues to promote and
push radiation, chemotherapy and surgery as the only viable
options for cancer treatment, this is simply not true.

Major studies within cancer research have been proven as

false which also suggests that the mainstream treatments we
use are based on fraudulent findings and false science.

Its usually the treatments not heavily publicized and promoted

that we should keep our eye on.

More researchers are catching on, not to long ago University of

Michigan researchers suggested increasing public funding of
research to decrease potential bias from industry ties.

Dr. Glidden is an outspoken advocate of Wholistic Health. For more than two decades, he has been treating people with
Naturopathic therapeutics including Homeopathy, Heavy Metal Chelation, Herbal Medicine and Bio-identical Hormone
Supplementation.

Read the full story at: CollectiveEvolution

Chemotherapy Myth Shattered: Toxic Drugs Cause More Cancer Than They Prevent
March 21 2014 | From: NaturalNews

New research funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) has shattered the prevailing myth that chemotherapy
drugs actually fight cancer. To the contrary, researchers from Harvard University and the University of Massachusetts,
Amherst, (UMA) found that these clinical poisons, though sometimes initially effective at stemming the growth and spread of
existing tumor cells, eventually induce major stem cell damage that causes even more cancer.

Publishing their findings in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), the team that worked on the
project investigated how chemotherapeutics affect the body systematically by testing them out on fruit flies. According to an
announcement about the study, scientists administered human-equivalent doses of chemotherapy drugs to Drosophila, a type
of fruit fly, that had been spawned with a human cancer-causing gene, which activated in the flies' intestinal stem cells.

Read the full story at NaturalNews

42% Of Drug Reactions Are Vaccine Related, Groundbreaking Chinese Study Finds
March 11 2014 | From: GreenMedInfo

A groundbreaking new drug safety study published in the open access journal PLoS and titled, "Adverse Drug Reactions of
Spontaneous Reports in Shanghai Pediatric Population," has revealed for the first that that 42.5% of all reported adverse drug
reactions occurring in 2009 in a Chinese pediatric population (Shanghai, pop of 17 mil) were caused by vaccines, with
reactions as severe as anaphylaxis and death.
The report carries unique gravitas insofar as the data was gathered through spontaneous reports of physicians (52.03%),
pharmacists (24.27%) and other health care practitioners (15.46%), with only 2.52% coming from 'consumers.' Presumably,
the clinical training of those reporting gives the study additional credibility.

Read the full story at: GreenMedInfo

Harvard Research Finds Link Between Fluoridated Water, ADHD & Mental Disorders
March 10 2014 | From: CollectiveEvolution

New research published in The Lancet by researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and the Icahn School
of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) found that various chemicals that many children are exposed to are having a direct effect
on the creation of disorders labelled under the name ADHD as well as other mental disorders. One of the chemicals said to be
having an effect is fluoride, or variations of fluoride.

Governments have been performing artificial fluoridation for a number of years regardless of the lack of effectiveness it has in
preventing tooth decay.

The research began in a study published in 2006 which initially looked at the effects of various industrial chemicals on neuro-
development. The research continued with an analysis of more industrial chemicals including fluoride.

27 additional studies, including one that linked fluoride to the lowering of IQ in children, clearly illustrated the fact that fluoride
is detrimental to brain development and can lead to autism spectrum disorders and other mental issues. The issue is being
coined a silent epidemic and most health authorities continue to turn a blind eye to the issue.

The two main researchers involved in the study, Philippe Grandjean from HSPH and Philip Landrigan, both agree that the
reason for the increase in incidences of chemical-related neuro-developmental disorders is due to the increasing number of
untested chemicals that are being approved without proper testing.

The public is also not fully being told of the dangers which is causing many to perform independent research to find out the
true effects. The issue is not just in water fluoridation, but also in the vaccination of our children.

Read the full story at: CollectiveEvolution

Former Big Pharma Executive Turned Whistleblower Exposes Pharmaceutical Industry

Crimes and Corruption
March 9 2014 | Various Sources

Dr. John Rengen Virapen worked 35 years for Eli Lilly & Co as an executive. He now speaks out on the many crimes Big
Pharma was and is responsible for and he himself also participated in. Unfortunately, many of its crimes go passed public
awareness as it enjoys the unethical protection from its big allies, the mainstream media, the FDA and governments.

Below is a short introduction video. A link to the full length presentation follows below.

Click here to see the full four-part presentaion by Dr Virapen.

And it seems to me perfectly in the cards that there will be within the next generation or so a pharmacological method of
making people love their servitude, and producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people
will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to
rebel by propaganda, brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods.

- Aldous Huxley on psychological totalitarianism (1959)

Dangers Associated With Vaccinations Have Been Withheld From Public For 30 Years.
Here Are The Documents
March 1 2014 | From: CollectiveEvolution

In this day and age, its very dangerous and naive for us, health professionals included, to assume that health authorities and
pharmaceutical companies have our best interests at heart. We are living in a time where people are pushing for the freedom
of information and as a result, its coming to the surface.

For years, a massive amount of advertising has led people to believe that all vaccinations are safe and necessary. Many
individuals continue to promote themselves as believers of science, without actually looking at and examining the science
behind vaccinations.

Meanwhile, babies and children are bombard with a rigorous North American vaccination schedule that more and more
parents are choosing to opt out of. Much of this mistrust has to do with the lies and cover-ups from health authorities and
vaccine manufactures, who have been involved in a 30 year scandal.

Read the full story at: CollectiveEvolution

Major U.S. Utility: No Rational Basis For Smart Meters

February 25 2014 | From: TakeBackYourPower

Northeast Utilities (NU) operates New Englands largest utility system serving more than 3.6 million electric and natural gas
customers in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire.

In a written submittal filed with the Massachusetts Department of

Public Utilities, Northeast Utilities was highly critical of a proposed
state plan that would require utilization of advanced metering or
smart meters within the state of Massachusetts as part of an
electrical grid modernization plan.

In fact, the comments are quite remarkable in that they appear to

reflect reality without undue political spin or bias.

As a summary of what this article covers:

Overall Perspective No Rational Basis for Smart Meter Mandate

Smart Meters Are Not a Good Choice for Consumers

Smart Meter Costs Can Not Be Justified

 Smart Meters Are Not an Appropriate Technology Platform for Grid Modernization

Cyber-Security Issues Prevent Development of a Suitable Implementation Plan

Smart Meter Technology May Soon Be Rendered Obsolete

Read the full sory at: TakeBackYourPower

Vaccination Voodoo: New Book Reveals Truth About Vaccines

February 10 2014 | From: NaturalNews

Eye-opening research, expert testimonial and the cold hard statistics on vaccines converge in a groundbreaking new
book: Vaccination Voodoo: What YOU Don't Know About Vaccines.

Author Catherine J. Frompovich lights the way as she breaks down each chemical used in today's vaccines, explaining the
specific influence that the additives have on the human body.

Joined by Mayer Eisenstein, MD, JD, MPH, and Paul G. King, PhD, Frompovich yanks the mask off of Big Pharma's fake face,
exposing the propaganda that is dished out through the media while shining a light on the misinformation sold to medical
journals and medical professionals.

The book confronts the destructive and unquestioned ingredients in vaccines

The author delves right into the debate, discussing the dangers of injecting heavy metals directly into the blood and tissues,
how these metals can pass through the blood-brain barrier and how toxicity can ultimately impart damage to the neurological
system.

She confronts the use of adjuvants, the immune system stimulants in vaccines, for their destructive ability to cause hyper-
allergenic reactions and the autoimmune destruction of brain cells. Thimerosal, which is 49.6% ethylmercury, is scolded, while
toxic ingredients like aluminum, 2-phenoxyethanol, formaldehyde/formalin, polysorbate 80, phenol, glutaraldehyde, MSG and
sodium borate are exposed. She writes about other hidden ingredients in the injections, like monkey kidney cells, genetically
engineered insect viruses and diploid cells, which are aborted human fetal tissue.

She wastes no time calling out Big Pharma for their hand in causing multiple thousands of death each year, and debilitating
complications caused by controversial vaccines like Prevnar or HPV Gardasil strains that were sold to people as preventive
healthcare.

Swine flu vaccines, mass produced to expel H1N1 flu strains, are also confronted as a health fraud, responsible for bringing
mass waves of narcolepsy to young adults.

The book shows how vaccine safety propaganda is sold to medical journals and MDs

Her investigations show how many vaccine manufacturers own their own science journals that solicit authors to publish pieces
that promote Big Pharma's products. Many times, pharmaceutical companies have paid staff writers who peddle vaccines
down the medical profession line. The companies may pay off, or sell to medical doctors a bunch of propaganda that can be
published as the doctor's own medical research.

The book explains how vaccine manufacturers are exempt from a trial by jury
The book is up front about the "get out of jail free card" given to vaccine manufacturers. Through the passage of the 1986
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, Congress protected vaccine manufactures from ever being brought before a jury of
their peers. Thanks to this law, vaccine injury claims are lumped together and often dismissed as trial cases with no
credentials.
Now insulated from judicial accountability, pharmaceutical companies have gone all out selling their side effect-ridden
concoctions, promoting new experimental vaccines each year, which are now jabbed into children by the dozens here in the
21st century.

The book correlates increased vaccine schedules with rising neurological disorders in children,
including autism

This book helps everyone understand what's in vaccines, including various excipients, adjuvants, metals, growth media and
nanoparticles, and how these unnatural substances affect cellular function. The books helps people rethink about vaccine
admission requirements dictated to kindergartens and elementary schools, showing how increased childhood vaccination has
manifested a disturbing trend in autism in which 1 in 50 children are now affected. The books puts out statistics about the 60-
plus vaccines rammed down children today, a number that is three times greater than figures from 1970, and about how this
accumulated toxicity has created a generation of children sicker than decades ago.

Want to learn more? If you are interested in obtaining the facts of what's really in the barrage of vaccines manufactured
today...

If you are a medical professional who feels betrayed by the pharmaceutical industry and wants to become informed...

If you want to read more on the eye-witness testimonies of professionals and victims of vaccine injury...

If you want to research beyond and learn about the vaccine truths that the television and newspaper ads won't report on...

If you want to read further into the statistical correlations being made between these modern injections and their debilitating,
deadly injuries...

Then pick up a copy of the new book here: Vaccination Voodoo: What YOU Don't Know About Vaccines.

297 Scientists And Experts Agree GMOs Not Proven Safe

February 8 2014 | From: Ensser
Press release: European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental
Responsibility, 10 Dec 2013
EU chief scientist Anne Glovers backing for GM condemned as irresponsible
Independent researchers work double shift to address red flags on GMO safety
The number of scientists and experts who have signed a joint statement saying that GM foods have not been proven safe and
that existing research raises concerns has climbed to 297 since the statement was released on 21 October.

Dr Angelika Hilbeck, chair of the European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility (ENSSER),
which published the statement, said, Were surprised and pleased by the strong support for the statement. It seems to have
tapped into a deep concern in the global scientific community that the name of science is being misused to make misleading
claims about the safety of GM technology.

The statement indirectly challenges claims by EU chief science adviser Anne Glover that there is no evidence that GM foods
are any riskier than non-GM foods.

Dr Rosa Binimelis Adell, board member of ENSSER, said, It seems that Anne Glover chooses to listen to one side of the
scientific community only the circle of GMO producers and their allied scientists and ignores the other. Thus she is giving
biased advice to the EU Commission. For a science adviser, this is irresponsible and unethical.

New signatories to the statement include Dr Sheldon Krimsky, professor of urban and environmental policy and planning at
Tufts University and adjunct professor in the department of public health and family medicine at the Tufts School of Medicine.
Dr Krimsky said:

As a GMO crop skeptic, I have a more nuanced view of adverse consequences than uncritical proponents. Adverse
consequences of GMO crops are not restricted to keeling over dead after eating genetically adulterated unlabelled food
(GAUF). My concerns include subtle changes in nutritional quality or mycotoxins, increasing food allergens, unsustainable
farming practices, dependency on chemical inputs, lack of transparency in evaluating food quality and safety, and the
transformation of farming practices into a modern form of serfdom, where the seed is intellectual property leased by the
farmer.

To demonstrate the safety of GMO products, one must begin by assuming that they can be harmful, and carry out sensitive
tests that are capable of detecting harm. As with other technologies like aeronautics and nuclear power, those who
manufacture the products must not be the definitive source of safety data. Because rigorous safety testing has not happened
with GMO crops, I remain skeptical.

Another signatory, Dr Margarida Silva, biologist and professor at the Portuguese Catholic University, said, Even if researchers
did largely agree on GMO safety, that doesn't make them correct. To paraphrase Albert Einstein, it only takes one study to
prove a whole theory wrong no matter how many scientists believed in it.

In addition, research has been mostly financed by the very companies that depend on positive outcomes for their business,
and we now know that where money flows, influence grows. The few independent academics left must work double shift to
address the vast array of unanswered questions and red flags that keep piling up.

A third signatory, Dr Raul Montenegro, biologist at the University of Cordoba, Argentina, said:
"Usually, analysis of GMO safety fails to consider four main issues. One: GMO plants, seeds and byproducts contain not only
residues of commercial chemical pesticides, but also insecticidal proteins produced by the plant, like the Bt toxin Cry1Ab. Two:
each commercial pesticide contains a cocktail of chemicals that undergo chemical changes within pesticide containers, when
mixed with other pesticides, and when released in the environment. Three: In GMO agriculture each crop cycle begins with a
higher background level of commercial pesticides and insecticidal proteins accumulated in agricultural soil, peoples homes
and gardens, and exposed people. Four: GMO agriculture adds unwanted biodiversity (GMO genes) in countries having less
and less natural biodiversity as a consequence of deforestation, pesticides, GMO insecticidal proteins and uncontrolled flux of
engineered genomes.

Countries as Argentina and Brazil are paradises for GMO agriculture because their governments have not established
monitoring systems for disease and deaths from all causes, along with monitoring of the accumulation of residues of pesticides
and GMO insecticidal proteins in exposed people and the environment, and variation of natural biodiversity indexes. If these
monitoring systems were in place, it would be possible to measure the effects of GMO agriculture. As things stand, the
governments of these countries deny that there is a problem even in the face of numerous reports from the people who are
affected and the doctors who must treat them.

One Million Deadly "Smart" Electricity Meters Now Installed In New Zealand
January 22 2014 | From: Scoop

The rollout of smart electricity meters has reached a milestone with one million of the electronic meters now installed in New
Zealand homes and businesses.

New Zealands smart meter rollout has largely been driven by three of the large electricity retailers who have used it as an
opportunity to gain a competitive edge in the market. In most other countries where smart meters have been implemented the
rollout has been mandated.

Carl Hansen, Chief Executive of the Electricity Authority

says New Zealands approach is paying off for consumers.
Strong competition between retailers has meant the
meters are being installed free of charge to consumers. In
other countries, consumers have been charged up to $900
to have a smart meter installed.

Customers are now also seeing the benefits of more

innovative pricing and services, for example many retailers
are now marketing special packages for those with smart
meters, particularly to encourage and reward off-peak
electricity usage.

Smart meters also mean consumers are able to monitor

their electricity usage more closely which can assist with
reducing electricity consumption.

Genesis Energy has installed the most smart meters with

395,754 connection points (including those installed for its
Energy Online brand).
The non-ionising radiation from a smart meter is equicalent to having a
cell tower in your home.

By April 2015 it is estimated there will be more than 1.2 million smart meters in New Zealand, with just over 800,000 of the
traditional meters remaining.

Note: All data as at 31 December 2013. On this date 1,001,475 of the 2,066,827 connection points in New Zealand were
recorded as having smart meters installed.

The Dangerous and Deadly Truth About "Smart" Meters

There are thousands of disasterous 'Smart' Meter horror stories from all around the world. 'Smart Meters' are dangerous
(causing ill health and fires) and inaccurate - and that's just for a start. In some places they have even been banned by
legislation.

The 'Smart' Meter issue is a severe one which will affect everyone if not addressed. This becomes
clear once you understnad how these devices work.

See the trailer for Take Your Power Back Below. For more on this see our article here.

We also have a number of related stories and videos on Wakeupkiwi - the most relevant to this are the following:

Health & Wellbeing

Brian Thiesen: Technical Facts and Political Adgenda of SmartMeters

Health & Wellbeing

The Truth About "Smart Meters"

Surveillance Society / Police State

Take Back Your Power - Stopping the Smart Grid Agenda

Health & Wellbeing

Hidden Dangers of WiFi: EMF Pollution and the Human Impacts

To find out how you can protect yourself and your family from this menace - visit stopsmartmeters.org.nz

RT - The Truthseeker: 'Unequivocal' Cell Phones Cause Cancer

January 11 2014 | From: RT

Mobiles 'cooking the brain'; brain tumors become children's number one killer illness; and leaked industry memo admits
'wargaming' the science.

Seek truth from facts with former senior White House adviser Devra Davis, Storyleak editor Anthony Gucciardi, 'cell phone
survivor' Bret Bocook, Microwave News editor Louis Slesin, top radiation biologist Dariusz Leszczynski, and Ellie Marks,
whose husband Alan's suing the industry for his brain tumor.

Cures, Health & Wellbeing

 Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/health-wellbeing-2.shtml

Yet Another Vaccine Researcher Caught Faking Research; Vaccine

Industry Riddled With Scientific Fraud
December 27 2013 | From: NaturalNews

Related: Healing from Vaccine Injuries through Homeopathy

Yet another vaccine researcher has been caught faking research on a bogus AIDS vaccine,
adding to the pattern of scientific fraud and criminality that characterises the modern-day vaccine
industry.

Dr. Dong-Pyou Han from Iowa State University has resigned this week after admitting he spiked
rabbit blood samples with healthy human blood to falsely show the presence of antibodies that
would "prove" his AIDS vaccine worked.

Read the full article at NaturalNews which also goes into detail on the follwing:

Merck vaccine scientists blew the whistle on similar fraud inside Big Pharma

No punishment for scientific fraud

Nearly all vaccines are founded on fraud

Even vaccines that might actually work are intentionally laced with aluminum, MSG,
mercury and formaldehyde
If Cell Phone Radiation Were Visible, The World Would Look Like This
December 12 2013 | From: HuffingtonPost

What would the world look like if you could see cell phone radiation?

Artist Nickolay Lamm has tried to answer that question. In July, Lamm released a series of illustrations imagining a
Washington, D.C., where Wi-Fi was visible, bathing famous sites in a rainbow of colors. On Wednesday, he finished a sequel
of sorts -- a series of pictures of U.S. cities and landmarks, this time with cell phone radiation visible as a hazy, multicolored,
strangely geometric overlay.

Lamm worked with two professors of electrical and computer engineering -- Danilo Erricolo at the University of Illinois at
Chicago and Fran Harackiewicz at Southern Illinois University in Carbondale -- to get his illustrations right. (The pictures can
be seen with more technical explanation at MyVoucherCodes.com.) In an email to The Huffington Post, Lamm explained what
was going on with each picture.

Here, a "hexagonal grid of cellular base-station sites" covers the city of Chicago. Base stations, more commonly called cell
phone towers, sit at the corner of each hexagonal "cell" in Chicago's huge network. The picture also shows "antenna signal
extending beyond the original cells" that provides coverage over part of Lake Michigan.
Read the full story at HuffingtonPost

Mammograms Cause Breast Cancer (And Other Cancer Facts You Probably Never
Knew)
November 20 2013 | From: NaturalNews

Breast cancer is the leading cause of death among American women between the ages of 44 and 55. Dr. Gofinan, in his book,
Preventing Breast Cancer, cites this startling statistic along with an in-depth look at mammographic screening, an early-
detection practice that agencies like the American Cancer Society recommend to women of all age groups. According to most
health experts, catching a tumor in its early stages increases a woman's chances of survival by at least 17 percent.
The most common method for early detection is mammography. A mammogram is an X-ray picture of your breast that can
reveal tumor growths otherwise undetectable in a physical exam. Like all x-rays, mammograms use doses of ionizing radiation
to create this image. Radiologists then analyze the image for any abnormal growths.

Despite continuous improvements and innovations, mammography has garnered a sizable opposition in the medical
community because of an error rate that is still high and the amount of harmful radiation used in the procedure.

Read the full story at : NaturalNews

How Bad Is Cell Phone Radiation? Eric Dollard

October 17 2013 | From: YouTube

The EMF / Cell phone cancer link is being explored by more and more scientists as we move from the "denial phase" into the
"let's take a look at this seriously phase" in the face of more evidence presenting itself amongst the 5.9 BILLION cell phone
users internationally.

Dr. Devra Davis started off as a skeptic and has moved on to becoming a researcher and an educator of the cell phone cancer
risks.

Shredded Messiah - The Tragic Tale of Eric Dollard and Why we Don't Have Free Energy

From: YouTube

This video tells a secret story of manipulation and madness. It is a true account of how the genius of Eric Dollard and the
selflessness of the People have been shamelessly attacked by agents of suppression.

The recent Machiavellian plot against Aetherforce that was hatched by known suppression agent Aaron Murakami resulted in
the shattering of EPD Labs and the waste of thousands of donated dollars. However, this only one consequence of a much
larger tragedy. This larger tragedy grows from one man's naked greed and another man's deep alienation from society and
humankind.

Most of you will be shocked at the contents of this video. We at Aetherforce admit culpability for trying to preserve the
Professor's good reputation while raising over 30 thousand dollars for his new lab, car, and glom. We did so because we
hoped and believed that the Professor could conquer his demons once he saw that he had the full force of the People on his
side. Many of us donated money, time, and enthusiasm to show the Professor that we embraced his ideas and that we had
true affection for him as a person.

They suppressors, led by the self-promoting Aaron Marukami, thought that if they turned the icon of hope that we had created
against us that it would break us and the knowledge and unity that was forming around our movement would dissolve. They
would then be free to pursue the suppression of free energy and the monetization of their own dubious products.

Instead the opposite is happening.

Our victory is being watched by the world-at-large. Scores of researchers are already flooding to Aetherforce in droves.
Everyone is thrilled to finally be part of a united front against suppression. This may be the best thing to come out of the
present controversy, even more so than the knowledge itself. And that is the real purpose of this video.

The dream to build the Cosmic Induction Generator is still alive. It is time to accept that Dollard's theoretical contributions are
all the Professor is capable of offering at this point. We hope that he will eventually overcome the challenges that face him and
put his life back together. We also know this will never happen while he is under the "spell" of suppressors such as Aaron
Murakami.

Already scientists and scholars from all over the world are joining Aetherforce and labs are popping up all around us. Everyone
knows that knowledge of the aether is the best hope for humanity's future.
We need your support! Give this video a thumb's-up to show you support the quest for free energy. Let the suppressors know
they are in for the fight of their lives! Let's light up the Aetheric Revolution together.

First Study On 4G / LTE Cell Phone Radiation Shows It Affects Brain Activity
September 24 2013 | From: ActivistPost

New peer-reviewed research finds that 30 minutes exposure to LTE [4G] cellphone radiation affects
brain activity on both sides of the brain.

The first study on the short-term effects of Long Term Evolution (LTE), the fourth generation cell phone technology, has been
published online in the peer-reviewed journal, Clinical Neurophysiology.

In a controlled experiment, researchers exposed the right ear of 18 participants to LTE cellphone radiation for 30 minutes. The
source of the radiation was 1 centimeter from the ear, and the absorbed amount of radiation in the brain was well within
international (ICNIRP) cell phone legal limits. The researchers employed a double-blind, crossover, randomized and counter-
balanced design to eliminate any possible study biases.The resting state brain activity of each participant was measured by
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at two times after exposure to LTE microwave radiation, and after a sham exposure.
 Despite numerous alternative treatments that are now
coming to the forefront, the medical industry continues to
promote and push radiation, chemotherapy and surgery as
the only viable options for cancer treatment, this is simply
not true.

Major studies within cancer research have been proven as

false which also suggests that the mainstream treatments
we use are based on fraudulent findings and false science.

Its usually the treatments not heavily publicized and

promoted that we should keep our eye on.

More researchers are catching on, not to long ago University of Michigan researchers suggested increasing public funding of
research to decrease potential bias from industry ties.

The results demonstrated that LTE exposure affected brain neural activity not only in the closer brain region but also in the
remote region, including the left hemisphere of the brain. The study helps explain the underlying neural mechanism for the
remote effects of microwave radiation in the brain.

In 2011, Dr. Nora Volkow, Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, published a similar study in the Journal of the
American Medical Association that received worldwide news coverage. Dr. Volkow reported that a 50 minute exposure to
CDMA, a second generation cell phone technology, increased brain activity in the region of the brain closest to the cell phone.

The current study establishes that short-term exposure to LTE microwave radiation affects the users brain activity. Although
LTE is too new for the long-term health consequences to have been studied, we have considerable evidence that long-term
cell phone use is associated with various health risks including increased risk of head and neck cancers, sperm damage, and
reproductive health consequences for offspring (i.e., ADHD).

Cell phone users, especially pregnant women and children, should limit their cell phone use. Moreover, cell phone users
should not keep their phones near their head, breasts or reproductive organs when using the phone or whenever the phone is
turned on unless it is in airplane mode.

The Vaccine Hoax Is Over: Documents From UK Reveal 30 Years Of Coverup

May 10 2013 | From: nsnbc

Related: Healing from Vaccine Injuries through Homeopathy

Andrew Baker ( FFN),- Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official
documents showing that government experts have:

1. Known the vaccines dont work

2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
3. Known they are a hazard to children
4. Colluded to lie to the public
5. Worked to prevent safety studies

Educated parents can either get their children out of harms way or continue living inside one of the largest most evil lies in
history, that vaccines full of heavy metals, viral diseases, mycoplasma, fecal material, DNA fragments from other species,
formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (a sterilizing agent) are a miracle of modern medicine.

Freedom of Information Act filed in the US with the CDC by a doctor with an autistic son, seeking information on what the CDC
knows about the dangers of vaccines, had by law to be responded to in 20 days. Nearly 7 years later, the doctor went to court
and the CDC argued it does not have to turn over documents. A judge ordered the CDC to turn over the documents on
September 30th, 2011.

Read the full story at : nsnbc

Chemotherapy Ineffective 97% Of The Time
April 11 2013 | From: CollectiveEvolution

A study published in August 2003 revealed that of adult cancer in the USA and Australia, the use of chemotherapy, when
looking at adjuvant and curative use, provided a cure only 2.1% of the time in the USA and 2.3% of the time in Australia.

The study undertook a literature search for randomized clinical trials which saw a 5-year survival rate that was attributed solely
to cytotoxic chemotherapy in adult malignancies. The data was taken from the cancer registry in Australia and from the
Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data in the USA for 1998. As stated, the final results show that the overall
contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia
and 2.1% in the USA.

In the video below Dr. Peter Glidden cites the study that concludes better than 97% of the time, chemotherapy does not work.
Yet its one of the main treatments in the battle against cancer. Dr. Glidden explains why thats still the case.

Major Harvard Study Published In Federal Govt Journal Confirms Fluoride Lowers IQ
October 26 2012 | From: NaturalSociety

If the scientific link between fluoride exposure and a noted decreased in IQ is a conspiracy theory, then perhaps the Harvard
researchers who just confirmed such a link should be tarred and feathered by the evidence-based medical media. In a telling
review of a variety of studies that have demonstrated just how significantly fluoride can damage the brain and subsequently
your IQ, Harvard University scientists stated our results support the possibility of adverse effects of fluoride exposures on
childrens neurodevelopment.

The most outstanding component to the study is where it was published. Authors published their conclusion online in the July
20th edition of the prominent journal Environmental Health Perspectives, a federal government medical journal stemming from
the United States National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. The very same government that has continually
asserted that water fluoridation is both perfectly safe and effective at aiding the health of citizens who consume it on a daily
basis.

Read thefull story : NaturalSociety

Do Cell Phones Give You Cancer?

October 26 2012 | From: LifeEnergySolutions

The EMF / Cell phone cancer link is being explored by more and more scientists as we move from the "denial phase" into the
"let's take a look at this seriously phase" in the face of more evidence presenting itself amongst the 5.9 BILLION cell phone
users internationally.

Dr. Devra Davis started off as a skeptic and has moved on to becoming a researcher and an educator of the cell phone cancer
risks.

If you have an hour to spare this video is very informative:

If you don't have an hour then here is a brief summary:

It is not the power of cell phones that is the problem it is the fact that they present random and chaotic signals to the body.

Children are most susceptible to brain tumors due to their thinner skulls, faster cell growth and longer exposure. Unborn
children are also at greater risk and expectant mothers should reduce their cell phone use as it has been shown that expectant
mothers' cell phone use increases the chances of behavioral problems developing by 54%.

Cell phone exposure close to the body can weaken bones but can cause cancerous growth in soft tissues:

It is also not a good idea for anybody to carry cell phones in their pocket - especially guys who would like children at some
point.

A recent study states*: "RF-EMR in both the power density and frequency range of mobile phones enhances mitochondrial
reactive oxygen species generation by human spermatozoa, decreasing the motility and vitality of these cells while stimulating
DNA base adduct formation and, ultimately DNA fragmentation. These findings have clear implications for the safety of
extensive mobile phone use by males of reproductive age, potentially affecting both their fertility and the health and wellbeing
of their offspring."

In 2011 an Israeli research group reported a major increase in the incidence of parotid gland tumors over the last 30 years,
with the steepest increase happening after 2001. Your parotid gland is a type of salivary gland found in the area of the cheek -
close to where we place our cell phones when calling. The researchers found a four-fold increase in parotid gland cancers
from 1970 to 2006, while rates of other salivary gland cancers remained stable.

The World Health Organization has classified cell phone radiation as a class B carcinogen

On May 31 2011, the World Health Organization /International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) issued a report
admitting cell phones might indeed cause cancer, classifying radio-frequency electromagnetic fields as "possibly carcinogenic
to humans" (Class 2B). The classification came in part in response to research showing wireless telephones increase the risk
for brain cancer.

"Dr Jonathan Samet (University of Southern California, USA), overall Chairman of the Working Group, indicated that "the
evidence, while still accumulating, is strong enough to support a conclusion and the 2B classification. The conclusion means
that there could be some risk, and therefore we need to keep a close watch for a link between cell phones and cancer risk."

"Given the potential consequences for public health of this classification and findings," said IARC Director Christopher Wild, "it
is important that additional research be conducted into the long?term, heavy use of mobile phones. Pending the availability of
such information, it is important to take pragmatic measures to reduce exposure such as hands?free devices or texting."

So, back to the main question again: Do cell phones give you cancer? The answer seems to be very clearly that a growing
number of researchers are concluding that there is a real causal link between cell phone use and increased cancer risk. We
will keep on posting the latest science-based reports.

In the mean-time it would seem prudent to minimize usage of both cell phones and cordless home phones(radiation levels are
often higher and we use them for longer) and to keep them away from the body as much as possible.

Cell phone technology, as well as all other EMF producing technology should be made safe for everybody to use. Until this
happens, use common sense to minimize exposure and use protective tools to harmonize EMF radiation and so protect the
body and support the immune system.

An Inconvenient Tooth - Fluoride Documentary

October 26 2012 | From: AnInconvenientTooth
An Inconvenient Tooth is a documentary film about fluoride. It was released September 6th, 2012 at the city hall in Portland,
Oregon.

Its Official: Mammograms Cause Breast Cancer

October 26 2012 | From: DrLeonardColdwell

Its official: Mammograms cause breast cancer by inundating tissues with ionizing radiation that causes DNA
mutations.

Thats why mammography is a brilliant business model for the cancer industry: If women get annual mammograms, sooner or
later theyll find a tumor caused by the mammography! (And then theyll say Good thing we caught it early, huh?)

Study shows how radiation causes breast cancer

Its well-established that exposure to ionizing radiation can trigger mutations and other genetic damage and cause normal cells
to become malignant. So it seems amazing how mainstream medicine frequently dismisses the idea that medical imaging
tests from mammograms to CT scans could play much of a role in causing breast cancer. Take this example from the web site
for Cornell Universitys Program on Breast Cancer and Environmental Risk Factors:

In answer to the question Is ionizing radiation a cause of breast cancer?, the Cornell experts say Yes and note .. female
breast tissue is highly susceptible to radiation effects. But then they pooh-pooh the possible hazard from mammography x-
rays saying the risk should not be a factor in individual decisions to undergo this procedure. The same is true for most
diagnostic x-ray procedures.

If thats not confusing enough, they turn around and state: Nonetheless, unnecessary radiation exposures should be avoided
and continued vigilance is required to ensure that the benefits associated with specific procedures outweigh the future risks.

Why radiation causes breast cancer

Read the full story at DrLeonardColdwell

Distilled Water Is The Fountain Of Youth - Andrew Norton Webber

October 16 2013 | From: VinnyEastwood

Andrew Norton Weber [ www.andrewnortonwebber.com and www.aquariusthewaterbearer.com ] - If you drink a gallon of

distilled water per day you can reverse the aging process, flush out accumulated toxins from your body and even get your hair
color back.

The myth that distilled water leads to earlier death is just that, a myth, the truth is that the minerals some scientists allege that
get depleted from your body are in fact inorganic minerals that can't be absorbed anyway.

See this list of writings and testimonials from over 70 doctors and experts on the truth and positive benefits of distilled water.

Also see this 220 page PDF document of distilled water testimonials from www.aquariusthewaterbearer.com.
Taking The Piss
February 25 2013

Allegedly Dave and Andrew Norton Webber talk about the magical benefits of the Waters of Life, Urine Therapy and Distilled
(pure) Water on Awake Radio (www.awakeradio.co.uk)

Sylvia Chandler - Chelation Therapy & Urine [Distilled Water] Therapy

February 10 2012

A presentation by Sylvia Chandler, owner of Zen, a leading alternative health shop located in the centre of Birmingham and
Moseley. Sylvia has over 20 years experience in a wide variety of different fields. Her passion for the health and well-being of
the people of Birmingham, led Zen into the for front of "alternative" treatments.

With a selection of remedies/treatments/workshops, Zen has pioneered and revolutionised from the moment it opened,
encouraging people to learn new things, and making available all the therapies. Filmed on the 5th October 2011.

Brian Thiesen: Technical Facts And Political Adgenda Of "Smart" Meters

September 21 2012 | From: TheContrail

Public Forum in Enderby BC on Smart Meters and the Wireless Industry.

Notices for Refusing Installation of "Smart" Meters

From: StopSmartMetersNZ

Notice Refusing Consent For Installation Of Smart Meter (for electricity)

This is a template letter that you may choose to personalise and send to your electricity retailer to inform the
company that you refuse consent for the installation of a smart meter.

Notice Refusing Consent For Installation Of Smart Meter (for water)

A trial of smart water meters is due to start in Tairua on the Coromandel Peninsula. if you do not want to be part of
this trial, below is a template document that you can personalise send to the Thames-Coromadel District Council to
advise them of this fact.

Hidden Dangers Of WiFi: EMF Pollution And The Human Impacts

June 2 2012 | From: LongevityWarehouse
An introduction as to how wireless / electric fields interfere with us.

Also see The Truth About Smart Meters and The Truth About Wired and Wireless Technologies futher down this page.

World's Women Unite Against GMO's

June 2 2012

A group effort by women around the world to help inform others about the dangers of GMO food. We hope that this helps
illuminate others to the need to take back control of our food.

Another must-see: Food, Inc.

Rat Poison Chemical Found In Ingredient List For HPV Vaccine, Garasil
May 24 2012 | From: HolyHormones

Regular readers of the Inconvenient Woman Blog already know that I think the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, is a dangerous and
unnecessary drug. I believe that Merck has perpetrated a clever, profitable, but deadly hoax on the public.

Mercks proven ability to buy political cover, their award winning marketing campaign and the FDA / CDCs complete failure to
protect the women and girls of this country will allow the largest transfer of public money to private stockholders in history. To
the Merck shareholders HPV has come to stand for Help Pay-For Vioxx!
Read the full story at HolyHormones

Is HIV / AIDS A Scam?

May 18 2012

'House of Numbers'; here is a fascinating documentary that challenges the common view about HIV and AIDS.

Just when you think that you have uncovered all the deception surrounding todays medical industry; something like this
HIV/AIDS documentary comes along and reveals how much deeper the rabbit hole of deception actually goes!

Be prepared to learn directly from the HIV/AIDS experts that;

(1) HIV testing is a bunk, (could almost be compared to flipping a coin).
(2) the most common AIDS drugs are deadly even for healthy people,
(3) AIDS statistics are manipulated to justify funding for AIDS programs, (for example, if a healthy person turns up the 'positive'
test, once the AIDS drug program they are given has killed them, they are recorded statistically as having died of AIDS).
(4) HIV has never been seen under the microscope, is entirely theoretical, and may not even exist.

An hour and a half long, but well worth the education!!! You need to watch right to the end for the hard hitting facts...
Watch at the link below;'House of Numbers';
Disconnect - The Truth About Cell Phones And Cancer
May 6 2012 | From: DisconnectFilm

Instant Exposure Information For Radiation Workers

Monday, 16 April 2012, 2:34 pm | From Scoop

Press Release: Radiation Protection Services Limited - RadPro

Instant Exposure Information Now Available For Radiation Workers

We tend to think of New Zealand as nuclear-free but the reality is quite different. Radioactive material produced in nuclear
reactors in other parts of the world is imported into the country on a near daily basis and thousands of x-ray generations are at
work up and down the country. X-rays, gamma rays and radiopharmaceuticals are used extensively in human and animal
health and radioactive sources are deployed in a plethora of industrial and research applications.

Human senses cannot detect the presence of ionising radiation and over time the cumulative effects of undetected radiation
exposure become a threat to health. This is of particular significance for the thousands of workers whose occupation brings
them into close and frequent contact with sources of ionising radiation. New Zealand has regulations setting occupational
exposure limits for radiation workers and personal monitoring is generally mandatory to ensure that these limits aren't
exceeded.

At present most radiation workers in New Zealand are monitored using a piece of photographic film worn inside a plastic
holder. After a wearing period of between one and three months, the film is removed from the holder and sent away to be
developed and a dose estimated by measuring the change in density (or blackening) of the processed film. Practical film-
badge dosimeter technology emerged from the Manhattan Project during the Second World War.

The way in which radiation workers are monitored is set to change with the introduction of a new and very different type of
dosimeter that has just been approved for legal use in New Zealand. This device is based on novel direct ion storage
technology where a specially fabricated transistor records the total amount of ionizing radiation received. Direct ion storage
technology is used at the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) facility in Switzerland and a militarised version
is used by a number of European NATO member countries.

The radiation sensitive components of the new dosimeter are packaged together with interface circuitry into a small and
lightweight USB pen-drive shaped unit. Instead of waiting months for information about a possible exposure, radiation workers
can now plug their dosimeter directly into a USB port of an Internet-connected Windows or Mac computer and get an instant
readout of any dose received. Dosimeters can be read on-site as often as needed offering peace of mind and saving time and
hassle sending dosimeters away for processing. Incident exposures can be investigated immediately minimising further
potential harm.

Based in Christchurch, Radiation Protection Services Limited (RadPro) provides personal monitoring solutions for individuals
at risk of occupational exposure to sources of ionising radiation. RadPro is an authorised distributor of Mirion Technologies
Dosimetry Services Division and distributes the instadose direct ion storage dosimeter in New Zealand.

Read the full story at Scoop

Look Up: The New Age Of Inoculation Is Aerial Vaccines And Nano Delivery Systems
April 16 2012 | From: PreventDisease.com

PreventDisease - Jan 12 2012

As the masses enjoy a steady awakening regarding the dangers and fraud that are vaccinations, the use of aerial vaccines
and nano delivery systems are now being utilized and fully implemented by governments with little regard or consequence to
human health.

Geoengineering initiatives (commonly referred to as chemtrails) are no longer considered discreet military operations, and are
finally admitted by goverments. Aerial vaccines and nano delivery systems are one of many geoengineering projects.
The use of aerial manned and unmanned vehicles for the aerial spraying under State and Federal mandates for vector control
began under the Geneva Act for Chemical and Biological Weapons in 1949.

Over the years since its inception many amendments to this act and US parallel acts such as the Patriot Act of 2001, Space
Preservation Act of 2001 and Weather Modification Research and Technology Act of 2005 have included the following
implementations under terrorist and riot control for aerial spraying of the mass population in selective city locations:

- Weather Modification.
- Vector Control (insects, virus, and other similar vectors).
- Mass Inoculations of the Public.

Aerial vaccines are also directed towards animals by the use of plastic packets dropped by planes or helicopters.
Sanofi (who is one of the largest vaccine manufacturers in the world) has subsidiary companies such as Merial Limited who
manufacture Raboral, an oral live-virus poisonous to humans yet distributed wildlife in the masses. "In the United States, more
than 12 million doses of RABORAL V-RG vaccine are used each year.

Since the first use of RABORAL V-RG in the late 1980's, more than 100 million doses have been distributed around the world."
At the beginning of the year, a KVUE news report indicated that the Texas Department of State Health Services would initiate
an aerial vaccine drop of 1.8 million doses in January alone.

Raboral V-RG is a poison because according to the material safety data sheet its ingestion, parenteral inoculation, droplet or
aerosol exposure to mucous membranes or on broken skin is considered a health hazard exposed to infectious fluids or
tissues.

Read the full story at From: PreventDisease.com

Your Health And Sanity In The Age Of Treason - For The Mental Deterioration And Moral
Debasement Of The Mass, As A Means Toward Their Enslavement
April 10 2012 | From: AotearoaAWiderPerspective

I am just starting to dig into this doc but so far it seems like a blueprint for our toxic, soft kill world today.

Just look at the subtitle: "Food and Liquids Used as a Medium in Deliberately and Carefully Planned Methods
Developed by the Vicious Element of Humanity, for the Mental Deterioration and Moral Debasement of the Mass, as a
Means Toward Their Enslavement."

Uhmyeah. There are links to the entire book at the bottom of this post I also posted a brief summary from Old-Thinker
News.
Read the full story at AotearoaAWiderPerspective
For The Record: Rockefeller Soft Kill Depopulation Plans Exposed
March 26 2012 | From: InfoWars

In the course of August and September 2010, I wrote several articles for Infowars on the Rockefeller Foundations admitted
funding and developing of anti-fertility vaccines intended for mass-scale distribution.

As the soft-kill depopulation agenda accelerates it seems all the more relevant to re-post these articles as one. I ask the great
Infowars-readership to project this information out to as many people as possible.

Only by countering the elites disinformation with genuine information do we stand a chance against their plans for humanity.
Read the full story at InfoWars

World Watches As New Zealand Starts Flu Immunisation Campaign

March 13 2012 | From: Scoop

New Zealands national free influenza immunisation campaign was officially launched in Wellington today by the National
Influenza Specialist Group (NISG) 1.

The campaign this year to protect New Zealands at-risk population from this serious illness may, however, also have a global
impact.

This is the first year of a major international five-year flu study being funded by the US Governments Centre for Disease
Control (CDC) and conducted by New Zealand scientists in the Auckland region.

The SHIVERS (Southern Hemisphere Influenza and Vaccine Effectiveness Research and Surveillance) project aims to help
improve international knowledge prevention and treatment of flu by looking at what proportion of the population gets flu each
year, which groups are hardest hit, how often flu is the underlying cause of death, and how effective flu vaccines are among
certain groups of the population.

Read the full story at: Scoop

Global Activism Is Taking Down The Toxic Corporate Food Industry

March 12 2012 | From: InfoWars

The foundation of the international food industry, monopolized by large corporations that hold zero regard for your health,
is cracking . As more and more individuals begin to realize that they are eating their way to disease through the consumption
of these products, they become outraged at the companies peddling their latest toxic food product.

The result? Companies are now being forced to either answer to the consumer demands (removing the toxic substances from
the food supply and adapting legitimate environmental manufacturing practices) , or lose their customers.

Increasingly, we see this happening on a larger scale. Major companies like Campbell's have begun abandoning bisphenol
A ( BPA ), the cancer-linked chemical found in can linings and plastic containers. The change comes after even the FDA was
forced to re-evaluate the safety of BPA, potentially issuing a ban by the end of this month.

Linked to cancer, diabetes, and much more, consumers have become fully aware of the dangers that BPA presents and
they aren't handing over their hard-earned dollars to companies that refuse to remove BPA from their products.

Read the full story at: InfoWars

Australian Bill Allows For Sterilizations Without Parental Consent At Any Age
March 9 2012 | From: NaturalSociety

Following the call by ethicists for after-birth abortions and the press explosion surrounding the Euthanasia Coaster , new
legislation from Australia is now paving the way for children of any age to consent to sterilization without parental consent .
That's right, if a psychiatrist determines that a child under the age of 18 years is sufficiently mature', they will be sterilized
without any say from the parents. Again, there is no age minimum , as long as they are mature enough.

The legislation, known as the Draft Mental Health Bill 2011', also allows for 12-year-olds to consent to psychosurgery and
electroshock . You can view the bill for yourself on the Australian Mental Health government website. Written by the Western
Australia Mental Health Commission (MHC) and overseen by Mental Health Commissioner and clinical psychologist Mr Eddie
Bartnik, objections can still be submitted to Australian parliamentary members in each state until March 9th.

Read the full story at: NaturalSociety

Aspartame Danger: Urgent Warning About Tumors And Seizures

March 6 2012 | From: Infowars

The laws governing the sale of drugs and food additives require substances be safe for human consumption.

The artificial sweetener aspartame primarily consumed in beverages and as a popular sugar substitute has consistently been
found to cause tumors and brain seizures in animal subjects.

In 2005, a European Cancer Research Center, the Ramazzini Foundation, called for an urgent re-examination of aspartame in
food and beverages to protect children.
This call is made in the face of the US FDA stand that aspartame is safe for human consumption on the ground that
aspartame as a carcinogen is not supported by data.
Read the full story at: InfoWars.com

Food Matters
March 6 2012 | From: FoodMatters

"Let Thy Food Be Thy Medicine, And Thy Medicine Be Thy Food." - Hippocrates

That is the message from the founding father of modern medicine echoed in this brave new documentary film brought to you
by Producer-Directors James Colquhoun and Laurentine ten Bosch.

' Food Matters' is a hard hitting, fast paced look at our current state of health. Despite the billions of dollars of funding and
research into new so-called cures we continue to suffer from a raft of chronic ills and every day maladies. Patching up an over-
toxic and over-indulgent population with a host of toxic therapies and nutrient sparse foods is definitely not helping the
situation. In a personal quest of discovery James & Laurentine together with a film crew and the editorial and production
expertise of Enzo Tedeschi have set out on an independent mission to uncover the wholesome truth.

The filmmakers have interviewed several world leaders in nutrition and natural healing who claim that not only are we harming
our bodies with improper nutrition, but that the right kind of foods, supplements and detoxification can be used to treat chronic
illnesses as fatal as terminally diagnosed cancer.

'Food Matters' seeks to uncover the business of disease and at the same time explore the safe, cheap and effective use of
nutrition and supplementation for preventing and often reversing the underlying causative aspects of the illness.

With the premise of the film being: access to solid information helps people invariably make better choices for their health. The
'Food Matters' duo have independently funded the film from start to finish in order to remain as unbiased as possible,
delivering a clear and concise message to the world. Food Matters.

From: FoodMatters

Unvaccinated People A Public Health Threat? Nope, People Who Take Antibiotics Are
The Real Danger
March 6 2012 | From: InfoWars

Vaccine pushers often resort to an interesting fear tactic to try to mandate vaccine obedience among the masses: They insist
that those who are unvaccinated are a health threat to the rest of the vaccinated population because the vaccinated people
might get infected by the unvaccinated disease carriers!

The quack logic of such a claim should be self-evident. If vaccines protect people from infectious disease, then vaccinated
people should not be concerned at all about being around unvaccinated people. After all, the vaccine made them all immune,
right?

But of course thats all propaganda. Vaccines dont really work at all. They are marketed under a blanket of disease hysteria
and pimped by a cult following of medicalized quacks and needle junkies who abandoned real science long ago. After all, who
needs real science when youve got the CDC marketing all the fear for you? The CDC is to medicine what George Bush was
to the war industry spread a little fear and the profits roll in.

The real risk to others? People who routinely take antibiotics

Read the full story at InfoWars

Monsantos Roundup Herbicide Found to Destroy Testosterone, Male Fertility
March 3 2012 | From: InfoWars

(NaturalNews) A recent study published in the Journal of Toxicology in Vitro has found that, even at very low levels,
Monsanto's herbicide formula Roundup destroys testosterone and ultimately leads to male infertility. The findings add to the
more than 25 other diseases known to be linked to Roundup, which include DNA damage, birth defects, liver dysfunction, and
cancer.

For their study, Emilie Clair and her colleagues from the Universite de Caen Basse-Normandie Institute of Biology in France
tested the effects of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, on testicular cells from rats. Ranging in dilution from one
part per million (ppm) to 10,000 ppm, which accounts for varying exposure levels in real life situations, each of the tests
revealed undeniable cell toxicity caused by Roundup.

Read the full story at : InfoWars

Dr. Magda Havas: The Truth About Wired And Wireless Technologies
Febuary 24 2012 | From: TheContrail

Dr. Havas is an associate professor of Environmental & Resource Studies at Trent University where she teaches and does
research on the biological effects of environmental contaminants.

Her research deals with the health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic energy at the extremely low frequency range
associated with electricity (60 Hertz) and at the radio frequency range commonly associated with wireless telecommunication.

Dr. Havas is particularly interested in monitoring exposure of the population in urban centres to radio frequency radiation and
power-frequency fields.

She is the author of numerous works on the subject. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Toronto, completed Post-
Doctoral research at Cornell University, and taught at the University of Toronto before going to Trent University in
Peterborough, Canada.

Also see this page on the United States Environmental Protection Agency website about cleaning up after a compact
fluorescent "energy saving" lightbulb breakage.

These bulbs are very bad for you to use, and if they break will release toxic mercury vapour turning the area into a toxic waste
zone.

The Truth About "Smart Meters"

Febuary 24 2012 | From: TheContrail

Are Smart Meters Really Smart?

The city councils of Santa Cruz, Scotts Valley, Capitola and Watsonville, and the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors
have called for a moratorium on the installation of PG&E "SmartMeters".

Why is PG&E ignoring these explicit demands and going ahead with the 2+ billion dollar "roll out"?
The SmartMeter system collects electric and gas usage from homes and transmits the data via pulsed microwave to a wireless
network (no meter readers).

FIND OUT if these microwave meters are the future for GREEN energy or DANGEROUS and INACCURATE and reveal
private details of daily life - when people wake up, come home, take a hot bath and go on vacation.

Were Bone Scans Bone Scams?

Febuary 24 2012 | From: Scoop.co.nz

Women are in such danger of osteoporosis they need regular bone scans. That was conventional medical "wisdom" since the
first lucrative bone drug surfaced over a decade ago.

But a recent article in New England Journal of Medicine reveals that the warnings don't apply to 90 percent of women who
have been getting the scans--and the bone drugs the scans were designed to sell--for no reason. How did this happen?

In 1994, a year before Fosamax, Merck's blockbuster bone drug, was approved, Merck began marketing the dangers of
osteoporosis "far beyond ailing old ladies."

It hired researcher Jeremy Allen to whip up osteopenia fears to sell bone drugs by planting bone scan machines in medical
offices across the country, says National Public Radio. Allen created the faux "Bone Measurement Institute" to establish
osteopenia, the "risk of osteoporosis," as a health epidemic.

The scheme worked. By 1999, there were 10,000 bone scan machines in medical offices, said the Associated Press, when
there had been only 750 before the bone drugs hit the market. The diagnosis of osteopenia increased seven fold.

Read the full story at Scoop.co.nz

Ten Ways Monsanto And Big Ag Are Trying to Kill You - And The Planet
Febuary 1 2012 | Visit OrganicConsumers.org for the full story

#1 Generating Massive Greenhouse Gas Pollution (CO2, Methane, Nitrous Oxide) and Global Warming; While Promoting
False Solutions Such as Industrial Biofuels, So-Called Drought-Resistant Crops, and Genetically Engineered Trees

#2 Polluting the Environment and the Soil-Food Web with Pesticides, Chemical Fertilizers, and Persistent Toxins, Including
Dioxin

#3 Turning Farmland into Desert

#4 Poisoning Drinking Water, Acidifying the Oceans

#5 Chopping Down the Rainforests for Monoculture GMO Crops, Biofuels and Cattle Grazing

#6 Increasing the Cost of Food, While Reducing Nutrition and Biodiversity

#7 Spawning Pesticide-Resistant Superbugs and Weeds, and Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria

#8 Generating New and More Virulent Plant, Animal and Human Diseases
#9 Utilizing Wasteful Fossil Fuel-Intensive Practices and Encouraging the Expansion of Natural Gas Fracking and Tar Sands
Extraction (Which Destroy Forests, Aquifers, and Farmland)

#10 Stealing Money From the 99% to Give Huge Subsidies to the 1% Wealthiest, Most Chemical and Energy-Intensive Farms
and Food Producers

Visit OrganicConsumers.org for the full story

United Nations Preparing To Manage Global Mental Health

January 31 2012 | From InfoWars.com

In a world where national sovereignty is rapidly becoming a thing of the past, announcements that the United Nations will be
taking the lead on any variety of topics is no longer shocking. Indeed, there is a real push across the world to view the United
Nations as the ultimate authority on virtually every issue, from human rights to nutritional content in food.

Through decades of propagandizing, the United Nations has developed an undeserved reputation for humanitarianism and
democracy. As a result, the vast majority see the United Nations as a benevolent organization which they can call on to defend
human rights in their home countries.Unfortunately, national sovereignty rarely enters into the equation anymore, as the
average citizen tends to look straight to the United Nations to address their concerns, bypassing their own governments.

Read the story at: InfoWars.com

Failure of Global Government, Bill Gates Hostile Takeover & Cocaine At The UN
January 31 2012 | From InfoWars.com

While global government bodies continue to promise a better world through consolidation, the real face of the New World
Order comes in the form of forced GMO crops and drug scandals.

The purchase by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation of 500,000 shares of Monsanto stock is just one subset of his super-
funds hostile takeover of the global food and medicine china. Monsanto is the worlds largest producer of genetically modified
food, while the Gates and Rockefeller Foundations push AGRA on Africa, hinged around GMO drought-resistant crops.

Sixteen scientists have signed on to an op-ed published in The Wall Street Journal declaring there is no need to panic about
so-called global warming and rush to decarbonize the world instead, its part of an agenda that considers man an enemy.

Read the story at: InfoWars.com

Monsanto Investor Bill Gates Says GMO Crops Needed To Fight Starvation
From InfoWars.com

Bill Gates, the heavy Monsanto investor who purchased 500,000 shares of the biotech giant in 2010, has been touting
Monsantos genetically modified creations as a tool that is necessary to prevent starvation in poor nations.

The same poor nations where thousands of farmers routinely commit suicide after being completely bankrupt by Monsantos
overpriced and ineffective GM seeds.
The same company that we recently exposed to be running slave-like working conditions, forcing poor workers to operate the
corn fields for 14 hours per day while withholding pay.

According to Gates, this is the company whose GMO crops are going to save the world from starvation. Of course, along with
saving the world from starvation, GMO crops also bring along a large number of unwanted health and environmental effects.

A prominent review of 19 studies examining the safety of these crops found that consumption of GMO corn or soybeans can
lead to significant organ disruptions in rats and mice particularly in the liver and kidneys.

Read the story at: InfoWars.com

Monsanto: There is no need for, or value in testing the safety of GM foods in humans
January 25 2012 | From InfoWars.com

There is a growing body of scientific evidence which proves that genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) are inherently
different from natural organisms, including the way the body processes them, as well as how the immune system responds to
them. But Monsanto, the largest purveyor of GMOs in the world, believes that GMOs are no different than natural organisms,
and that GMO testing is both needless and valueless.

In theWhy arent you running human clinical trials on GM crops?section of MonsantosFood Safetypage, the biotechnology
giant explains its opinion that GMOs are substantially equivalent to natural organisms. According to Monsanto, since
concentrations of proteins, carbohydrates, and other nutrient factors vary among natural crops, as well as among natural and
GM crops, then these differences are automatically unimportant in light of GMO safety.

Read the story at: InfoWars.com

Fukushima Cover Up Unravels: The Government Can No Longer Pull the Wool Over the
Publics Eyes
January 24th 2012 | From WashingtonsBlog.com

Too Much Radiation to Cover Up

The Japanese government and Tepco have covered up the extent of the radiation released by Fukushima and its health
effects on the Japanese and others.

Critics say the government can no longer pull the wool over the publics eyes, as they contend it has done routinely in the past.

The content was so shocking that we decided to treat it as if it didnt exist, a senior government official said.

Read the story at: WashingtonsBlog.com

Edible Drug-Tracking Microchips to be Unveiled in UK by Year's End

January 20th 2012 | From Sott.net

Imagine a world where the government monitors everything you eat and drink, and makes sure you take all your
pharmaceutical drugs by feeding you an edible microchip that transmits this compliance information remotely to authorities.

Such a world is almost a reality, as a California-based biotechnology company is about to unveil an edible microchip tracking
device in the UK that monitors patients' compliance with prescribed drug regimes, and sends this information to family
members and caretakers.

The UK's Independent says Proteus Biomedical, the company responsible for making the edible microchip, has formed a
commercial partnership with Lloyds pharmacy, a UK pharmacy and healthcare provider, to begin selling the tiny chips to
patients by year's end.

Smaller than a grain of sand, the tiny chip will monitor which drug pills are taken, and electronically send this information to
patches worn on patients' arms. The patches will then send the information to the mobile phones of patients' relatives and
physicians.

See the full story at Sott.net

The 10 Biggest Vaccine News Stories of 2011

A lot happened in the vaccine industry in 2011 a year of accelerating change and increased awareness among the people.
One of the big realizations that hit home in 2011 is that vaccines are far more dangerous than most people previously thought,
and even conventional scientists are starting to question the over-vaccination of infants and children.

Click here for the 10 biggest vaccine news stories of 2011, reported on NaturalNews.com and InfoWars.com.

Bioweapons - Should Science Be Censored?

December 21 2011 | From Scoop

Wednesday, 21 December 2011, 10:50 am

Press Release: Science Media Centre

Bioweapons - should science be censored?

21 December 2011

Scientists seeking to publish highly controversial studies on the avian influenza virus H5N1 have agreed to remove key details
from manuscripts describing their work following requests from the U.S. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity
(NSSAB).

This effective censorship of scientific research - including potential to create airborne contagions - has sparked debate over
the balance between freedom of information and public safety.

Two groups of virologists are planning to publish their research in the leading scientific journals Science and Nature.

Their research identifies mutations in bird flu H5N1 DNA which could make the virus more transmissible and dangerous to
humans. The NSSAB expressed concern that such information could be used by terrorists orchestrating a biological attack
using the virus.

Both research groups have now reluctantly agreed to redact data from their submitted manuscripts at the request of the
NSSAB. Discussions are currently under way to determine how other scientists may gain access to the removed data.

See the full story at Scoop

American Addict The Movie - Trailer
December 20 2011 | From: AmericanAddictMovie

The pharmaceutical nightmare that has been inflicted upon the world:

The Effect of Fluoride on the Pineal Gland

December 19, 2011

A dissertation submitted to the School of Biological Sciences, University of Surrey, in fulfillment of the requirements for the
Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

Read the full story at InfoWars.com

NZ Government Moves to Restrict Home Grown Food: Food Bill 160-2
Novmber 21 2011
Part of the Codex Alimentarius worldwide rollout this is a real trojan horse. While the Greens dismiss the truth of this, the
framework for the worst case scenario will be written into legistlation.
Click here to download a print resolution PDF of this overview. Thank you to AoteaAWiderPerspective for this.

Bizarre Advice To Editors from NZ Science Media Centre

October 7 2011 | From: Scoop.co.nz

The publicly-funded NZ Science Media Centre is offering bizarre suggestions to news editors and journalists about how to
report the accidental spread of GE canola in Australia and the US.

The SMC advises that science reporters should talk about GE canola "brightening the roadsides with yellow during their
flowering," and to report that the latest research paper "is unremarkable and not at all surprising."

The SMC media advice comes at the same time as publication of research confirming the spread of GE crops and herbicide-
resistance into the US environment.

Rather than advising the media of scientific uncertainty and debate about the implications of GE crops spreading, the SMC
advises media to say that contamination had happened before and was just being "repeated now in the US state of North
Dakota."

In Australia contamination from GE canola has ended up with farmers in court, and Western Australian growers are being
asked to stop growing GM Canola by grain exporters.

New Zealand farmers are also alarmed at the risk to exports and local cropping from GE maize and GE wheat.There is
concern that Monsanto may attempt to enforce the introduction of GE seeds through trade agreements like the TPPA.

The spin being pushed by the New Zealand Science Media Centre cannot be taken seriously when it deliberately ignores the
scientific debate, and fails to consider the economic implications of GE contamination for New Zealand's clean-green image
and global exports.

The SMC does not mention that increased use of toxic chemicals in the environment is being directly blamed on growing
herbicide resistance in weeds and in GM crops. By ignoring this and instead advising journalists with PR spin that "herbicide
resistance in canola is of no consequence if the canola is not sprayed," the SMC is dismally failing to provide the media with a
credible perspective on scientific issues having claimed until now that this was its purpose and mission.

H1N1 Swine Flu Propaganda - TVNZ Report

July 9 2010

On Friday 9th July 2010 it was reported that 1 million New Zealanders have
been immunised with H1N1 Flu vaccination.

Upon hearing this I immeidately smelt a rat! I find it impossible to believe

this. Could this be just another way to push this dangerous vaccination
upon the New Zealand public.

The agenda behind this immunisation is claimed to be part of a mass

depopulation type agenda. See the youtubes below. As in other countries,
they are also trying to make this vaccine mandatory in New Zealand.

One way to test if the New Zealand television media is lying is to do your
own poll. If they are corret then 1 in 4 people in New Zealand will have
received this vaccine.

Courtesy: RelatingToLife.com where you can also view the CBS 60 Minutes
documentary on the swine flu epidemics of 1976 in the U.S.
 It went on air only once and was never shown again.

Monsanto Now Owns Blackwater (Xe)

From: DarkGovernment

A report by Jeremy Scahill in The Nation (Blackwaters Black Ops, 9/15/2010) revealed that the largest mercenary army in the
world, Blackwater (now called Xe Services) clandestine intelligence services was sold to the multinational Monsanto.

Blackwater was renamed in 2009 after becoming famous in the world with numerous reports of abuses in Iraq, including
massacres of civilians. It remains the largest private contractor of the U.S. Department of State security services, that
practices state terrorism by giving the government the opportunity to deny it.

The Truth About Fluoride final cut with Dr Paul Connett MR NEWS
If you thought that Fluoride was safe and effective, then you've no doubt been following the mainline medicine and
government line.

Unfortunately the truth is that they lied, committed fraud and covered up evidence in order to facilitate water fluoridation.

The following is an in depth presentation by Dr. Paul Connett, the world's leading authority on fluoride toxicity at the
UNCENSORED conference in the grey lynn community hall in New Zealand.

You can buy this on DVD here: www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com

Also see the Flouride Action Network New Zealand Website www.fannz.org.nz and www.fluoridealert.org

United States Patent for 'Genetically Engineered Swine Influenza and Uses Thereof'
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has a listing for, 'Genetically Engineered Swine Influenza Virus and Uses Thereof'.

Download United States Patent 20090010962 here.

This vaccine patent was filed with the U.S. Patent Office in 2005. They waited for the patent to be approved in 2009 before
unleashing the virus, so they could cash-in!

The patent was finally approved on January 8th, 2009. In other words, the makers of the Swine Flu Vaccine began the lengthy
patenting process long before the Swine Flu supposedly existed, which means the outbreak was no accident, and this virus is
clearly not natural.

The virus conveniently went public only after its vaccine patent was approved, after waiting 3 years for it. Could we possibly
get any better proof that the Swine Flu was man made and intentionally unleashed? We have it in writing by their own
admission that they made it!

The pandemic was declared just five months after the patent was approved, in June of 2009. Tremendous hysteria followed
that was promoted by the same groups who "invented" (their word) this admittedly genetically engineered virus.

The patent application states:

"The present invention relates, in general, to attenuated swine influenza viruses having an impaired ability to antagonize the
cellular interferon (IFN) response, and the use of such attenuated viruses in vaccine and pharmaceutical formulations.

In particular, the invention relates to attenuated swine influenza viruses having modifications to a swine NS1 gene that
diminish or eliminate the ability of the NS1 gene product to antagonize the cellular IFN response.

These viruses replicate in vivo, but demonstrate decreased replication, virulence and increased attenuation, and therefore are
well suited for use in live virus vaccines, and pharmaceutical formulations."

You see, this virus was not discovered in the wild. It was "invented". The patent ownership is claimed by the Mount Sinai
School of Medicine (of New York University), St. Jude Children's Hospital, and the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture. St. Jude!

Indeed, the rabbit hole goes very deep.

Under the 'inventors' section of the patent is listed:

Palese, Peter (Leonia, NJ) Garcia-Sastre, Adolfo (New York, NY) Webby, Richard J. (Memphis, TN) Richt, Juergen A. (Ames,
IA) Webster, Robert G. (Memphis, TN) Lager, Kelly M. (Colo, IA)

These names should live in infamy, and each of these people should be held accountable for every Swine Flu death.

Why would an 'attenuated' (weakened for the purpose of vaccines), genetically engineered virus exist, and be patented prior to
any outbreaks in history ? when it doesn't exist outside the laboratory?

When we first reported on the Swine Flu on the audio show, we mentioned the impossibility of it having occurred naturally.
After all, Swine Flu, Avian Flu and human flu D.N.A. cannot naturally mix without destroying themselves. If the above patent
application did not match the Swine Flu virus that is now being found in humans exactly, then it would be completely useless
for creating immunity.

Therefore, since the above patent is for a genetically engineered virus, then the virus spreading through the population would
also have to be genetically engineered in an identical fashion, and almost certainly would have come from the same
laboratory.

The virus is documented by the U.S. Patent Office to have been intentionally created prior to 2005, at a time when the virus
"did not exist". The virus would have to wait three years for patent approval to exist in the wild. The only question that remains
is, was this bio-weapon attack against the public accidental, or intentional?

Considering that they had this vaccine ahead of time, and the coordinated media cover-up yields the depressing answer to this
question.

Was it just a test run, before they release something that is much worse? Was it an attempt to create panic, so that they could
rush more bills through like they did in the weeks following the World Trade Center attacks?

Is it all part of a population control experiment for the New World Order?

United Nations and Pharmaceutal Companies Admit to Bioweapon Components in

Vaccines and The Eugenics Agenda
Vaccine Death Coverup Implodes Worldwide:

H5N1 Swine Flu: US Patent Provides Proof of a New Genetically Enginered Bioweapon
The H5N1 Swine Influenza virus is a genetically enginnered bioweapon, as evidenced by the 2009 United States Patent filing
number 20090010962 which you can downlaod and review for yourself here.
1976 Swine Flu Vaccine Documentary

See LoveForLife.com for further information and evidence.

Slow Kill Holocaust: Proof the Governments are Poisoning You

Proof that the government is poisoning the population. With their stated goal to reduce population worldwide, the eugenicists
who run the world state have resorted to any means necessary to target reproduction and fertility, including the outrageous
measures identified in the 1969 Planned Parenthood World Population memo written by Frederick S. Jaffe.

See the full story at InfoWars.com

The Aspartame Trap: You May Be Unknowingly Ingesting this Toxic Sweetener
From InfoWars.com

The risk of artificial sweeteners is still very real. Aspartame is used as a substitute sweetener in thousands of products. Most
diet sodas, processed foods and candies contain this alternative to sugar. If you arent careful, youll easily run into it
somewhere in your food.

Aspartame is marketed not by its real name, but through products like Equal and NutraSweet. This is because aspartame itself
has a bad reputation as a dangerous excitotoxin. An excitotoxin is named for its ability to excite the cells of the body into
overproducing a particular chemical, thus burning them out prematurely. Aspartame in particular has been found to affect brain
cells, by mimicking the response to sweetness and producing an artificial form of it.

One study actually found that 67% of female rats exposed to aspartame developed tumors roughly the size of golf balls or
larger.

Read the full story at InfoWars.com

Spraying San Francisco, Exposing the Geo-Engineers

From: InfoWars.com
On a heavy spraying day, we talked to passers-by on what they made of the persistent contrails blanketing the city, often
referred to as chemtrails. Video features congressional candidate John Fitzgerald confronting top geoengineer Ken Caldeira at
San Francisco public library. We also illustrate the difference between water based contrails and persistent contrails when a
regular plane (with a short lived contrail) crosses the path of a persistent contrail at a similar altitude.
 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Speech About Vaccine Cover Ups
Robert F. Kennedy gives a speech about government cover ups and the harmful effects of toxins in vaccines.

See more information about vaccines at HealthFreedom.co.nz

Cures, Health & Wellbeing

Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/health-wellbeing-1.shtml