You are on page 1of 917

False Flag Attacks, Fake Terrorism & Engineered Wars

History has proven that both localised and global circumstances and events may be successfully
manipulated by small groups with vested interests. Most human wars are testament to this fact.

The same tried-and-true methods and techniques have been used over and over again and
perfected throughout the last few hundred years. Only now are the masses awakening to the
manipulation that has been used to divide and conquer the many by the few for so many
generations.

'If you think it's simply not possible for the human race to have been duped by the machinations
of an elite who will stop at nothing to play out their agendas using the most incomprehensibly evil
tactics - you are either in denial or patently stupid.'

As the world now stares down the barrel of another engineered war - World War 3 - we
must do all that we can to spread the word so that the people of the world are not once
again (and for the last time) led into manipulated, murderous and genocidal oblivion.

Facts You Need To know About Syria & Syrian President Bashar Al Assad Fields
Questions From French Media And Defends Alternative Media
January 12 2017 | From: AustralianNationalReview / 21stCenturyWire

The Assad family belongs to the tolerant Islam of Alawid orientation.


Syrian women have the same rights as men to study, health and education.

Syrian women are not forced to wear the burqa. The Sharia (Islamic law) is unconstitutional.

Related: Ron Paul on Aleppo Aftermath: We Need a New Syria Policy

Syria is the only Arab country with a secular constitution and does not tolerate Islamic extremist movements.
Roughly 10% of the Syrian population belongs to one of the many Christian denominations, all fully integrated in
Syrian political and social life.

In other Arab countries the Christian population is less than 1% due to sustained hostility.

Syria has banned genetically modified (GMO) seeds, stating his decision was made in order to preserve human
health,

Syria has an opening to Western society and culture like no other Arab country.

Its media and universities openly debate the global power elites influence in things. This means that they fully
grasp the fact that real power in the West lies not in the White House but rather with the complex and powerful grid
of elite think-tanks and central banks.

Throughout history there have been five popes of Syrian origin. Religious tolerance is unique in the area.

Prior to the current civil war, Syria was one of the only peaceful countries in the area, having avoided major wars
or internal conflicts.

Syria was the only country that admitted Iraqi refugees without any social, political or religious discrimination.

Syria clearly and unequivocally opposes Zionism and the Israel government.

Following a massive oil find in Syrias Golan Heights, occupied by Israel since 1967, Netanyahu recently asked
Obama to recognize its annexation of the territory. To consolidate its hold, plans are afoot to quadruple Israeli
settler numbers to 100,000.

And The Most Two Important Points:


Syria is one of the only countries in the Middle East without debts to the International Monetary Fund (Pre-
invasion Libya & Iran the only others)

Syria is the only Mediterranean country which remains the owner of its oil company, with an oil reserve of 2,500
million barrels, the operation of which has avoided privatization and is reserved exclusively for state-owned
enterprises.

So now ask yourself, why are we truly attempting to overthrow yet another government?

What are we hoping to fix here?

If the recent invasions and illegal assassinations of Presidents like Qaddafi and Saddam have taught us anything, it should
be the understanding of the blowback effect of such lawless actions by the West and the vacuum of chaos that always
supersedes it.

Debt Conquer. Invent a reason to invade and destroy, then offer $Trillions in IMF funding to rebuild conveniently
paid back by control of your oil fields and the free access to build gas pipelines to the west.

Related Articles:

Bolivian actress Carla Ortiz exposes what went wrong with Western media coverage of Syrian conflict

Syria Story Is A Fools Paradise

Western Media Credibility In Free Fall Collapse: Case In Point: UN Peace Council: The US Media Is Lying To The
American people. The War In Syria Is Not A Civil War, It's A Proxy Invasion By The United States

Syria: Attack On Aid Convoy Kills Twenty, Destroys Aid, And Obliterates US War Crimes In Support Of ISIS-Daesh
Terror Group?

I Am A Syrian Living In Syria: It Was Never A Revolution Nor A Civil War: The Terrorists Are Sent By Your
Government

The Boy In The Ambulance: US State Dept-Funded Groups Behind Latest 'Iconic Image' Designed To Demonize
Russia And Encourage Further Bloodshed In Syria
Checkmate! U.S. Loses Syria & Turkey; Erdogan Will Visit Putin + John McCain Is Directly Responsible For ISIS

Clinton Email Reveals: Google Sought Overthrow Of Syria's Assad

In Syria, If You Cant Find Moderates, Dress Up Some Extremists

Paris-Syria Timeline Of Terror

The End Of The New World Order As Russia Shifts Balance Of Power: Russia's Syrian Operation To Smash
Terrorists, End Tyranny Of Banking Elite

Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's President Assad & War is
Peace: US Needs External Enemy to Ensure Internal Unity

Syrian President Bashar Al Assad Fields Questions From French Media And Defends
Alternative Media

Recently we reported on the targeting of a French delegation to Syria, led by politician, Thierry
Mariani, by the US backed FSA (Free Syrian Army) Company 23.

Aleppo airport was shelled by this group of primarily US supported moderate rebels led by a defected Syrian
Arab Army colonel, Hassan Rajoob, just prior to the planned take off of the plane ferrying the delegation back to
Damascus.

Related: US, UK Paid White Helmets Help Al Qaeda Blocking Water To 5 Million Syrians
The delegation then met with Syrian President, Bashar Al Assad, on the 9th January 2017. Following the meeting, President
Assad met with and fielded questions from French media.

Related: US Backed Moderate Rebels Target French Delegation in Aleppo

We always have hopes that the next (French) administration, or government, or president will want to deal with
the reality, to disconnect themselves from the disconnected policy from our reality. That is our hope..and they can
work for the interests of the French people.

The question now, after six years, as a French citizen, do you feel safer? I dont think the answer is yes. The
immigration problem, has it made the situation in your country better? []

This is the question the next administration, government, president should deal with in order to deal with our reality
not what is in their imagination as has been happening for the last six years.

(Fillons) rhetoric regarding the terrorists, or lets say the priority to fight the terrorists and not meddling in the affairs
of other countries are welcome, but we have to be cautious, because what we have learned in this region, during
the last few years, is that many officials would say something and do the opposite.

I am not saying M Fillon would do this, I hope not, but we have to wait and see because there is no contact. But so
far, what he is saying, if it is implemented, that will be very good.

If I want to send (a message to French politicians) I would say the self evident thing, that we have to work for the
interests of the Syrian citizens, and for the last six years the situation is going in the opposite direction. The French
politics harmed the French interests.

For the French people, I would say the mainstream media has failed in most of the west, the narrative has been
debunked because of the reality and you have the alternative media, you have to look for the truth.

Truth was the main victim of the events in the Middle East, including Syria.

I would ask any citizen in France, please search for the reality, for the real information, through the alternative
media. When they search for this information, they can be more effective, in dealing with their government, or at
least not allowing some politicians to base their politics on lies.

Related: Who Are Syria's White Helmets?

American Pravda: How The CIA Invented "Conspiracy Theories"


January 10 2017 | From: UNZ / ActivistPost / Various

With the sudden, bizarre rise of the Fake News accusations throughout the entire Corporate
Media megaphone and the equally bizarre and totally unsubstantiated CIA allegations that the
Russians had stolen the election for Donald Trump, this topic is highly pertinent.
A year or two ago, I saw the much-touted science fiction film Interstellar, and although the plot wasnt any good,
one early scene was quite amusing. For various reasons, the American government of the future claimed that our
Moon Landings of the late 1960s had been faked, a trick aimed at winning the Cold War by bankrupting Russia into
fruitless space efforts of its own.

Related: Trump Plans to Shrink, Reorganize CIA, Other Intel Agencies

This inversion of historical reality was accepted as true by nearly everyone, and those few people who claimed that Neil
Armstrong had indeed set foot on the Moon were universally ridiculed as crazy conspiracy theorists. This seems a realistic
portrayal of human nature to me.

Obviously, a large fraction of everything described by our government leaders or presented in the pages of our most
respectable newspapers - from the 9/11 attacks to the most insignificant local case of petty urban corruption - could
objectively be categorized as a conspiracy theory but such words are never applied.

Instead, use of that highly loaded phrase is reserved for those theories, whether plausible or fanciful, that do not
possess the endorsement stamp of establishmentarian approval.
Related: The 70 Greatest Conspiracy Theories in Pop-Culture History

Put another way, there are good conspiracy theories and bad conspiracy theories, with the former being the ones
promoted by pundits on mainstream television shows and hence never described as such.

Ive sometimes joked with people that if ownership and control of our television stations and other major media
outlets suddenly changed, the new information regime would require only a few weeks of concerted effort to totally
invert all of our most famous conspiracy theories in the minds of the gullible American public.

The notion that nineteen Arabs armed with box-cutters hijacked several jetliners, easily evaded our NORAD air defenses,
and reduced several landmark buildings to rubble would soon be universally ridiculed as the most preposterous conspiracy
theory ever to have gone straight from the comic books into the minds of the mentally ill, easily surpassing the absurd lone
gunman theory of the JFK assassination.

Even without such changes in media control, huge shifts in American public beliefs have frequently occurred in the recent
past, merely on the basis of implied association.

In the initial weeks and months following the 2001 attacks, every American media organ was enlisted to denounce and vilify
Osama Bin Laden, the purported Islamicist master-mind, as our greatest national enemy, with his bearded visage endlessly
appearing on television and in print, soon becoming one of the most recognizable faces in the world.
But as the Bush Administration and its key media allies prepared a war against Iraq, the images of the Burning Towers were
instead regularly juxtaposed with mustachioed photos of dictator Saddam Hussein, Bin Ladens arch-enemy.

As a consequence, by the time we attacked Iraq in 2003, polls revealed that some 70% of the American
public believed that Saddam was personally involved in the destruction of our World Trade Center.

By that date I dont doubt that many millions of patriotic but low-information Americans would have angrily denounced and
vilified as a crazy conspiracy theorist anyone with the temerity to suggest that Saddam had not been behind 9/11, despite
almost no one in authority having ever explicitly made such a fallacious claim.

These factors of media manipulation were very much in my mind a couple of years ago when I stumbled across a short but
fascinating book published by the University of Texas academic press. The author of Conspiracy Theory in Americawas
Prof. Lance deHaven-Smith, a former president of the Florida Political Science Association.
Based on an important FOIA disclosure, the books headline revelation was that the CIA was very likely responsible for the
widespread introduction of conspiracy theory as a term of political abuse, having orchestrated that development as a
deliberate means of influencing public opinion.

During the mid-1960s there had been increasing public skepticism about the Warren Commission findings that a lone
gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, had been solely responsible for President Kennedys assassination, and growing suspicions
that top-ranking American leaders had also been involved.

So as a means of damage control, the CIA distributed a secret memo to all its field offices requesting that they
enlist their media assets in efforts to ridicule and attack such critics as irrational supporters of conspiracy
theories.

Soon afterward, there suddenly appeared statements in the media making those exact points, with some of the wording,
arguments, and patterns of usage closely matching those CIA guidelines.

The result was a huge spike in the pejorative use of the phrase, which spread throughout the American media, with the
residual impact continueing right down to the present day. Thus, there is considerable evidence in support of this particular
conspiracy theory explaining the widespread appearance of attacks on conspiracy theories in the public media.
But although the CIA appears to have effectively manipulated public opinion in order to transform the phrase conspiracy
theory into a powerful weapon of ideological combat, the author also describes how the necessary philosophical ground
had actually been prepared a couple of decades earlier.

Around the time of the Second World War, an important shift in political theory caused a huge decline in the respectability of
any conspiratorial explanation of historical events.

For decades prior to that conflict, one of our most prominent scholars and public intellectuals had been historian Charles
Beard, whose influential writings had heavily focused on the harmful role of various elite conspiracies in shaping
American policy for the benefit of the few at the expense of the many, with his examples ranging from the earliest
history of the United States down to the nations entry into WWI.

Obviously, researchers never claimed that all major historical events had hidden causes, but it was widely accepted that
some of them did, and attempting to investigate those possibilities was deemed a perfectly acceptable academic enterprise.

However, Beard was a strong opponent of American entry into the Second World War, and he was marginalized in the years
that followed, even prior to his death in 1948. Many younger public intellectuals of a similar bent also suffered the same fate,
or were even purged from respectability and denied any access to the mainstream media.

At the same time, the totally contrary perspectives of two European political philosophers, Karl Popper and Leo Strauss,
gradually gained ascendancy in American intellectual circles, and their ideas became dominant in public life.

Popper, the more widely influential, presented broad, largely theoretical objections to the very possibility of important
conspiracies ever existing, suggesting that these would be implausibly difficult to implement given the fallibility of human
agents; what might appear a conspiracy actually amounted to individual actors pursuing their narrow aims.

Even more importantly, he regarded conspiratorial beliefs as an extremely dangerous social malady, a major contributing
factor to the rise of Nazism and other deadly totalitarian ideologies.

His own background as an individual of Jewish ancestry who had fled Austria in 1937 surely contributed to the depth of his
feelings on these philosophical matters.
Meanwhile, Strauss, a founding figure in modern neo-conservative thought, was equally harsh in his attacks upon
conspiracy analysis, but for polar-opposite reasons.

In his mind, elite conspiracies were absolutely necessary and beneficial, a crucial social defense against anarchy or
totalitarianism, but their effectiveness obviously depended upon keeping them hidden from the prying eyes of the ignorant
masses.

His main problem with conspiracy theories was not that they were always false, but they might often be true, and therefore
their spread was potentially disruptive to the smooth functioning of society.

So as a matter of self-defense, elites needed to actively suppress or otherwise undercut the unauthorized
investigation of suspected conspiracies.

Even for most educated Americans, theorists such as Beard, Popper, and Strauss are probably no more than vague names
mentioned in textbooks, and that was certainly true in my own case. But while the influence of Beard seems to have largely
disappeared in elite circles, the same is hardly true of his rivals.

Popper probably ranks as one of the founders of modern liberal thought, with an individual as politically influential as left-
liberal financier George Soros claiming to be his intellectual disciple.
Related: George Soros World is Falling Apart, Blames Everyone but Himself

Meanwhile, the neo-conservative thinkers who have totally dominated the Republican Party and the Conservative
Movement for the last couple of decades often proudly trace their ideas back to Strauss.

So, through a mixture of Popperian and Straussian thinking, the traditional American tendency to regard elite
conspiracies as a real but harmful aspect of our society was gradually stigmatized as either paranoid or politically
dangerous, laying the conditions for its exclusion from respectable discourse.

By 1964, this intellectual revolution had largely been completed, as indicated by the overwhelmingly positive reaction to the
famous article by political scientist Richard Hofstadter critiquing the so-called paranoid style in American politics, which he
denounced as the underlying cause of widespread popular belief in implausible conspiracy theories.

To a considerable extent, he seemed to be attacking straw men, recounting and ridiculing the most outlandish conspiratorial
beliefs, while seeming to ignore the ones that had been proven correct.
For example, he described how some of the more hysterical anti-Communists claimed that tens of thousands of Red
Chinese troops were hidden in Mexico, preparing an attack on San Diego, while he failed to even acknowledge that for
years Communist spies had indeed served near the very top of the U.S. government.

Not even the most conspiratorially minded individual suggests that all alleged conspiracies are true, merely that some of
them might be.

Most of these shifts in public sentiment occurred before I was born or when I was a very young child, and my own views
were shaped by the rather conventional media narratives that I absorbed. Hence, for nearly my entire life, I always
automatically dismissed all of the so-called conspiracy theories as ridiculous, never once even considering that any of
them might possibly be true.

To the extent that I ever thought about the matter, my reasoning was simple and based on what seemed like good, solid
common sense. Any conspiracy responsible for some important public event must surely have many separate moving
parts to it, whether actors or actions taken, let us say numbering at least 100 or more.

Now given the imperfect nature of all attempts at concealment, it would surely be impossible for all of these to be kept
entirely hidden. So even if a conspiracy were initially 95% successful in remaining undetected, five major clues
would still be left in plain sight for investigators to find.
And once the buzzing cloud of journalists noticed these, such blatant evidence of conspiracy would certainly attract an
additional swarm of energetic investigators, tracing those items back to their origins, with more pieces gradually being
uncovered until the entire cover-up likely collapsed.

Even if not all the crucial facts were ever determined, at least the simple conclusion that there had indeed been some sort of
conspiracy would quickly become established.

However, there was a tacit assumption in my reasoning, one that I have since decided was entirely false.
Obviously, many potential conspiracies either involve powerful governmental officials or situations in which their
disclosure would represent a source of considerable embarrassment to such individuals.

But I had always assumed that even if government failed in its investigatory role, the dedicated bloodhounds of the Fourth
Estate would invariably come through, tirelessly seeking truth, ratings, and Pulitzers. However, once I gradually began
realizing that the media was merely Our American Pravda and perhaps had been so for decades, I suddenly recognized
the flaw in my logic.
If those five - or ten or twenty or fifty - initial clues were simply ignored by the media, whether through laziness,
incompetence, or much less venial sins, then there would be absolutely nothing to prevent successful conspiracies from
taking place and remaining undetected, perhaps even the most blatant and careless ones.

In fact, I would extend this notion to a general principle. Substantial control of the media is almost always an absolute
prerequisite for any successful conspiracy, the greater the degree of control the better.

So when weighing the plausibility of any conspiracy, the first matter to investigate is who controls the local media
and to what extent.

Let us consider a simple thought-experiment. For various reasons these days, the entire American media is extraordinarily
hostile to Russia, certainly much more so than it ever was toward the Communist Soviet Union during the 1970s and 1980s.

Hence I would argue that the likelihood of any large-scale Russian conspiracy taking place within the operative
zone of those media organs is virtually nil.
Indeed, we are constantly bombarded with stories of alleged Russian conspiracies that appear to be false
positives, dire allegations seemingly having little factual basis or actually being totally ridiculous.

Meanwhile, even the crudest sort of anti-Russian conspiracy might easily occur without receiving any serious mainstream
media notice or investigation.

This argument may be more than purely hypothetical. A crucial turning point in Americas renewed Cold War against Russia
was the passage of the 2012 Magnitsky Act by Congress, punitively targeting various supposedly corrupt Russian officials
for their alleged involvement in the illegal persecution and death of an employee of Bill Browder, an American hedge-fund
manager with large Russian holdings.

However, theres actually quite a bit of evidence that it was Browder himself who was actually the mastermind and
beneficiary of the gigantic corruption scheme, while his employee was planning to testify against him and was therefore
fearful of his life for that reason.
Naturally, the American media has provided scarcely a single mention of these remarkable revelations regarding what might
amount to a gigantic Magnitsky Hoax of geopolitical significance.

To some extent the creation of the Internet and the vast proliferation of alternative media outlets, including my own small
webzine, have somewhat altered this depressing picture.

So it is hardly surprising that a very substantial fraction of the discussion dominating these Samizdat-like publications
concerns exactly those subjects regularly condemned as crazy conspiracy theories by our mainstream media organs.

Such unfiltered speculation must surely be a source of considerable irritation and worry to government officials who have
long relied upon the complicity of their tame media organs to allow their serious misdeeds to pass unnoticed and
unpunished.

Indeed, several years ago a senior Obama Administration official argued that the free discussion of various
conspiracy theories on the Internet was so potentially harmful that government agents should be recruited to
cognitively infiltrate and disrupt them, essentially proposing a high-tech version of the highly controversial
Cointelpro operations undertaken by J. Edgar Hoovers FBI.
Until just a few years ago Id scarcely even heard of Charles Beard, once ranked among the towering figures of 20th century
American intellectual life. But the more Ive discovered the number of serious crimes and disasters that have completely
escaped substantial media scrutiny, the more I wonder what other matters may still remain hidden.

So perhaps Beard was correct all along in recognizing the respectability of conspiracy theories, and we should return to his
traditional American way of thinking, notwithstanding endless conspiratorial propaganda campaigns by the CIA and others to
persuade us that we should dismiss such notions without any serious consideration.

Related: Conspiracy Theorist Max Spiers Found Dead Days After Texting His Mother to Investigate if Anything
Happened to Him

False Flag Terrorism: Murdering The Innocent In Order To Support The Lie + 15 Ways
To Detect A False Flag Operation
January 9 2017 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / ActivistPost / Various

As my readers know, I reported, factually, on the Boston Marathon alleged bombing case. I
interviewed carefully the pro bono attorney, John Remington Graham, who intervened in behalf of
the Russian aunt, a lawyer in the Russian Federation, in behalf of the falsely convicted younger
Tsarnaev brother, Dzhokhar, the older brother having been murdered by the FBI.

Graham conclusively proved that the FBIs own evidence proved beyond any doubt that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was
innocent, which means so was the older brother.

Related: False Flag Terrorism explained: A Star Wars Analogy

It is clear beyond reasonable doubt that there was no real bombing at the Boston Marathon and that the alleged terrorist
event, using crisis actors, was an orchestration designed to convince dumbshit Americans that they really were under a
Muslim threat. The entire foreign policy of the United States in the 21st century is based on an orchestrated Muslim
threat.

The orchestrated threat was also used for a practice exercise in closing down one of Americas largest cities in order to
manhunt with intent to kill a young man chosen as the villain for the orchestrated event.
Related: Heres why Nazionists Launched Multiple False Flag Operations this Year

American citizens were forced at gunpoint out of their homes while Homeland Security, a Nazi reminiscent name from the
Hitler era, disrupted the life of an entire city and its airport service in behalf of this orchestrated event that murdered
American civil liberty.

The entire exercise was based on a lie, an event that never happened, like Saddam Husseins weapons of mass
destruction, Assads use of chemical weapons, Russias invasion of Ukraine, and so forth. Just another lie in behalf of the
exceptional people.

A number of websites have disproved the false case against the Tsarnaev brothers. Attorney John Remington Graham has
brought the case to the justice authorities, but the US Department of Justice (sic) has no interest whatsoever in justice.

Now comes forward an attorney, Mary Maxwell with a book. It is available online free. I read the first eight chapters, which
was sufficient to comfirm me in my independent conclusion that there was no Boston Marathon bombing by terrorists.

I recommend to you Mary Maxwells account. However, I will say that I believe that she uses irony excessively and that on
occasions her irony gets in the way of the factual message. Knowing this, stick with it, and read her account.

Irony is the style that she has chosen, and we must respect a person prepared to stand up to the murderous American
establishment and to challenge one of the founding myths of the American Police State and Washingtons wars against the
world.
Read her book Marathon Bombing - Indicting the Players here.

Any US citizen that believes the falsified case of the Boston Marathon bombing is a dangerous and direct threat to American
civil liberty and to the lives of millions of people on planet Earth.

If Americans do not wake up to the orchesrations to which they are subjected, they will forfeit their freedom. The Russians
and the Chinese are individually and together more powerful than Washington, and they are not going to put up with the lies
with which insouciant Americans are content.

If Americans cannot take back their country from self-serving oligarchs, Americans are doomed.

Related: 9/11 False Flag Conspiracy - Finally Solved (Names, Connections, Motives)

15 Ways To Detect A False Flag Operation


A false flag formula is becoming readily apparent in the face of so many mass shootings and
bombings in the US. The phenomenon has become so commonplace in the last 3 years that its
becoming more American than apple pie.
According to ShootingTracker.com, there have been 353 mass shootings in the USA for 2015 so far. However, as
scary as that number is, the good news is that you dont have to be afraid of them like you may think. A very large
number of them - and all of them with any mass media significance and attention are false flag staged terror
events.

Related: False Flag Terror. A Historical Overview

Some have real victims, some do not, but either way, the most criminal of all institutions the Government is the
orchestrating force behind them.

They are scripted, pre-planned operations which are definitely not the result of random gun violence. Just as Obama stated
(by hiding the truth in plain sight), there is a pattern behind these mass shootings. The Controllers are following a
definite false flag formula.

Below is a list of the top 15 elements of this formula, which you can now use to detect a false flag operation as it occurs:

False Flag Formula #1: Drill at the Same or Nearby Time and Place

The exercise or drill at the same time, at the same place has became the sine qua non or indispensable element of the
recent false flag operation. Sometimes there are slight variations on this when the Government plans a drill nearby (a few
miles away) rather than at the exact place, or plans a drill earlier on in the day, so it can just coincidentally go live.
There was a twist in the case of the recent San Bernardino shooting: the Government planned regular drills in the building
where the shooting took place every month! (Think about it what are the chances of a real mass shooting occurring in a
building used for mass shooting drills?)

As Captain Eric H. May, a former US Army military intelligence officer, stated:

The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack
you want to carry out."

In the case of 9/11, there were no less than 46 drills occurring simultaneously during the event, according to Webster
Tarpley, author of Synthetic Terror: Made in USA.

In the case of the London 7/7 bombings, Peter Power admitted on radio that he was leading a team who were training for
that exact scenario when it unfolded!
There were active shooter drills in all of the false flag attacks of Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon, Charleston, San
Bernardino, the Norway attack, the 2nd Paris attack of 2015 and many many more.

Whats the point of having a drill at the same time and place? Here are a few of its purposes:

1. Distract and remove key personnel who would otherwise be at the scene to contain and investigate it;

2. Confuse other personnel who will treat the whole event in a different way if they think it is a drill rather than a
real event;

3. Slow down, reduce or eliminate an effective response, especially of police and other law enforcement, given the
removal and confusion of personnel;

4. Distract and confuse witnesses, the media and the public in general;

5. Provide a great cover and period of lower defenses and security to carry out an attack, which would otherwise
be difficult or impossible if defenses were at their usual or optimal operating level.

False Flag Formula #2: Foreknowledge

Another way you can tell that a mass shooting is a false flag op is if you find proof of foreknowledge of the event. As it so
happens, all of the notorious and publicized mass attacks of late have had evidence of foreknowledge. Going way back in
time, there was foreknowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack of 1941 that got the US into World War 2.
There were many aspects of foreknowledge on 9/11, including the BBC reporting WTC7 falling before it actually did, and
mysterious calls to people like author Salman Rushdie and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown advising them not to fly to
NYC on Sept. 11th. Sandy Hook had blatant foreknowledge (with various webpages put up days before the event), as did
the Boston Marathon.

False Flag Formula #3: Eyewitnesses Have Conflicting Accounts

You can also spot a likely false flag operation when you see or hear of multiple conflicting witness accounts. In the case of
the Aurora Colorado Batman mass shooting, eyewitnesses claimed they saw an entire team of shooters, rather than the
single shooter James Holmes of the official narrative.

With Sandy Hook, we saw multiple scenes of law enforcement chasing men into the surrounding forest, yet the official
narrative declares the only shooter was Adam Lanza. In San Bernardino, too, witnesses stated they saw 3 white athletic
men, not the 2 brown husband-and-wife team we were told did the shooting.
Related: 1 Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Filed Against MSM For Staging 'Sandy Hook'

Conflicting eyewitness accounts can destroy the official narrative no matter what the detail is. On 9/11, various fireman told
us there were bombs in the building, contradicting the official story that planes alone took down the Twin Towers.
With Sandy Hook, Gene Rosens testimony itself was full of holes and was contradicted by that of the school bus driver and
the official report.

False Flag Formula #4: MSM Quickly Name and Demonize the Patsy

Have you ever wondered how quickly the MSM (Mainstream Media) discovers the name of the patsy? They had somehow
deduced that Osama bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 just hours after the attacks.

Have you ever wondered why the Government is so good at telling us who supposedly executed these attacks right after
they happen, with almost no time to investigate, yet cant seem to manage to actually stop these alleged terror attacks?
Related: President Putin Reveals Possession Of 9/11 Satellite Imagery Evidence Indicating US Government
Complicity In False Flag Attack

Without any evidence, the MSM endlessly repeated bin Laden like a crazy mantra after 9/11, despite the fact bin Laden
himself denied involvement in the attacks and that in the end he was never formally charged by the FBI.

Have you ever wondered why many of the patsies, or sorry, deranged mass shooters, are Muslim? That wouldnt have
anything to do with the fact that the Zionist Government and MSM are trying to paint all Muslims as crazy and scary, would
it? Nothing like a good dose of Islamophobia to take your freedom away

False Flag Formula #5: Patsy Has No Military Training, Yet Shoots Extremely Fast and Accurately

Another element of the false flag formula is the skilled and lethal patsy.

According to the official narrative of false flag ops like Sandy Hook and Aurora, we are supposed to believe that skinny and
non-muscular youths, without any discernible military training, were able to acquire expensive military gear (including armor,
guns, ammunition and more), wear that gear without getting bogged down in speed, and shoot incredibly fast and
accurately.

In San Bernardino, we are supposed to believe that a young mother was strong and skilled enough to participate in killing 14
and injuring 17 people while she was strapped up with body armor and holding heavy weaponry!

In these cases and more, the official story would have you believe that its no big deal or just a coincidence that the patsy
can acquire all this high-end gear and use it so well.

False Flag Formula #6: Patsy Gets Killed, Drugged or Suicided

It is also part of the false flag formula to ensure that the patsy, who is earmarked before the event to take the fall, cannot
speak out to rationally defend themselves. This is achieved in a number of ways. The simplest is to have the patsy kill
himself or herself by committing suicide.
Related: Case Closed: JFK Killed After Shutting Down Rothschilds Federal Reserve

Another favorite way is to take the patsy out in a thrilling high speed chase, which has the added benefit of drawing clueless
people in through the MSM and gushingly promoting the police state. Sometimes a patsy is killed in plain sight, just because
its so important to suppress his testimony (e.g. Lee Harvey Oswald in the JFK assassination).

A third way is to mind control and drug the patsy to such an extent that they become a zombie vegetable unable to articulate
anything, as was the case with James Holmes.

False Flag Formula #7: Shooter Leaves Manifesto

In this day and age, writing a manifesto is a strange and anachronistic thing to do. Yet, for some strange reason, shooters
manifestos seem to crop up an awful lot after mass shootings.

Conveniently for the Controllers, these manifestos provide a perfect explanation for the official narrative, and help fill in the
missing (non-existent) motive for the attack which probably pushes those on the fence over into believing the
Governments version of the event.

While the manifesto is not an element in every false flag operation, it is present in enough of them to be regarded as part of
the false flag formula.

False Flag Formula #8: Evidence Gets Conveniently Destroyed

Another element of the false flag formula is the deliberate destruction of evidence, so that the Controllers can cover their
tracks.
In 9/11, the scrap metal (in the smoldering ruins of the WTC towers) was immediately shipped off to China right from the
start; with Sandy Hook, the entire school was demolished; in San Bernardino, the supposed landlord of the supposed
shooters actually allowed MSM reporters into the suspects house to poke around and touch all their stuff, in complete
disregard for what could be a possible crime scene!

Could it get any more blatant?

False Flag Formula #9: No Obvious Motive for the Mass Attack

Have you ever wondered why there is no obvious motive in any of these mass shootings? Crimes are supposed to be
solved on the merit of motive and opportunity, yet to hide the reality of a false flag op, the MSM just lies about the motive
part, and chalks it up to a deranged shooter.
Other times we are offered the flimsiest of motives, such as people going on an all-out rampage because they had a
grievance with a co-worker. In San Bernardino, we were told the young mother, with a 1-year-old child, was aggressive and
psychotic enough to help kill 14 and injure 17 people at the risk of never seeing her child again!

Meanwhile, the real purveyors of these operations profit immensely from the ensuing fear, yet somehow the
majority of people dont seem to see that motive...

False Flag Formula #10: Immediate Calls for Gun Control

Gun control is obviously one of the key agendas behind all of these false flag mass shootings, since a disarmed population
is far easier to exploit and manipulate than an armed one. It is an obvious aspect of the false flag formula. Sometimes gun
control is even pushed in the immediate aftermath of the event when people are still in a highly emotional and suggestible
state.

Take a look at the behavior of Andy Parker, who we were told was the father of a victim killed in the Virginia mass shooting
of 2015.
Within hours of hearing the news of the death of his child, Parker had already contacted and talked with the
Governor of Virginia, and then appeared on TV saying he would be devoting his entire life to gun control.

In a similar fashion, Richard Martinez, the alleged father of a Santa Barbara mass hooting victim, appeared on TV right after
the death angrily pleading for more gun control. In both cases, the political agenda of gun control angrily dominated their
reactions, rather than grief or other emotions.

False Flag Formula #11: Fake Victims = Crisis Actors

The above 10 points are a useful outline of the false flag formula as it pertains to mass shootings with real victims, i.e. where
real people die. However, ever since the surreal Sandy Hook event, which still contains many unanswered questions, we
have entered the twilight zone of the false flag hoax.

This is a term used to describe the false flag mass attacks where no one dies where fake bodies, fake blood and fake
victims are used instead. In this way, the entire operation is more tightly controlled and less messy. A hallmark of the false
flag hoax is that the authorities never produce a credible piece of evidence showing an actual dead body of a victim.
Is this the same girl crying at all three massacres - Aurora, Sandy Hook and Boston?

The following 5 points relate to false flag hoaxes, and specifically to the people employed to pull them off crisis actors. It
is truly a testament to just how utterly fake our normal world is (the Matrix) that false flag ops have now descended to the
level where we have to question whether the event even happened at all.

There are organizations of crisis actors in the US (such as the IIF), and there is clear evidence crisis actors were
used at Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon and many others.
Related: Charlie Hebdo: French False Flag Terror Event

Government officials have been caught using the word actor to describe various players in these dramas; the MSM has
even resorted to calling them actors too (it was one of the buzzwords of the recent San Bernardino mass shooting).

False Flag Formula #12: Victims Get Killed Twice

The surreal quality of the false flag hoax reached point of absurdity when it was discovered that one of the victims was
reportedly killed twice!

We were told that Noah Pozner was one of the victims of the Sandy Hook shooting, yet his picture was also among
those killed in a Pakistan Taliban attack.

Apparently the recycling of fake victims is another part of the false flag formula.

False Flag Formula #13: Families of Victims Have Elite or Acting Backgrounds

Is it just a coincidence that the families of mass shooting victims have either elite or acting backgrounds? At the Sandy
Hook event, local CEO of the Newtown bank John Trentacosta (whose house was next to the Lanzas and had a lot of
unusual activity occurring there the day of Sandy Hook) was connected to the New York Federal Reserve (and thus the
international banking elite).

Francine Wheeler was formerly the personal assistant of former chief Democratic National Committee fundraiser Maureen
White whose husband Steven Rattner is a Wall Street investment banker and member of the Rockefeller CFR (Council on
Foreign Relations)!

Related: Censorship Shock: Amazon.com Bans Investigative Book Nobody Died At Sandy Hook Because It
Disagrees With Government Version Of What Happened

It was also noteworthy at Sandy Hook how acting showed up in the resumes of so many of the key players there. Gene
Rosen, David and Francine Wheeler (both professional actors) and others all had a background in acting. Father of Virginia
mass shooting victim Andy Parker is an actor (and a politician too). This fact supports the idea that another element of the
false flag formula is to watch for people with elite connections and acting backgrounds.

False Flag Formula #14: Families of Victims Show Little to No Emotion, and Even Snigger and
Laugh

Luckily for truth seekers, the majority of crisis actors used in these false flag events are poor actors who are utterly
unconvincing in the roles they play. The majority display little or no emotion after an alleged tragedy like losing a family
member child to a random and violent mass shooting.

It is true that humans do vary widely with emotional response and expression. However, with many of the crisis actors,
judging by their reactions, it simply strains credibility too much to believe that they have just have been through a harrowing
and traumatic ordeal.
Related: The Great Terrorism Hoaxes from Boston to Berlin #CrisisActors Exposed

Given the range of possible reactions to a tragedy like losing a loved one in a mass shooting, what are the chances that
many of the victims family members are so non-emotional, or so understanding, or so quick to forgive?

Its shameful enough that the crisis actors playing these roles are perpetrating a monumental deception on the public,
tugging at the average persons heartstrings solely to trick them.

However, on top of that, these actors have the gall to actually laugh to smile, snigger and giggle while pulling off their
atrocious stunts. The only conclusion to draw from this is that it must be pretty funny to get a paid gig like this fooling millions
of people

False Flag Formula #15: Families of Victims Receive Millions in Federal Payoffs

In the US, the land of the lawsuit, people are generally pretty fast to initiate a lawsuit if they feel they have been wronged. It
is highly strange, therefore, that none of the alleged parents of the Sandy Hook event decided to sue the Government for
negligence or to demand redress for any other grievance.
Additionally, many of the alleged parents received a total of millions in unsolicited federal payouts (check out the free
houses they magically got on Christmas day 2009) thats right, unsolicited.

The Federal Government just gave it over to them without asking! Ask yourself: is is more likely the Government would just
do this out of the goodness of its heart, or that the money was more like a bribe/blackmail/payout all rolled into one, awarded
to actors playing a part in a role and being sworn to silence?

Related: Sandy Hook Truth Bomb Patch Media's Blatant LIES About Jonathan Reich

Conclusion: Use the 15 Elements of the False Flag Formula to Be More Aware

These are 15 elements I noticed forming the false flag formula. There may well be more.

Meanwhile, use the knowledge you have of the false flag formula to become more aware, wise and hip to the deception, so
that the next time it unfolds (as it surely will), you will be among those that spot the fakery, rather than among those who are
too scared, shell-shocked and gullible to do anything other than buy the official narrative.

Related: Articles:

Turkish Nightclub a False Flag: Mistaken Prime Suspect? Turkish Nightclubs Security Taken Over Prior to Attack
Saudi survivor: There were three killers at Reina nightclub on New Year

Convenient? Active Shooter Kills 5 in Fort Lauderdale, CNN Claims Voices in His Head Told Him to Join ISIS

Florida Governor Reaches Out to Trump Multiple Times after Shooting Bypasses Lame Duck Obama

Berlin False Flag Faked - Video Hoax

Analysis by Ole Dammegard of Norway Breivik Massacre as a False Flag Event

Ian R Crane - The False Flag Agenda

What Is The Obama Regime Up To? + Seven Ways Obama Is Trying To Sabotage The
Trump Administration
January 5 2017 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / Breitbart / Various

Obama has announced new sanctions on Russia based on unsubstantiated charges by the CIA
that the Russian government influenced the outcome of the US presidential election with
malicious cyber-enabled activities.
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued a report related to the declaration of 35 Russian
officials persona non grata for malicious cyber activity and harassment.

Related: Its A Plot, The Russians Are Coming: Obama Illegally Sanctions Russia for Nonexistent US Election
Hacking

The report is a description of:

Tools and infrastructure used by Russian intelligence services to compromise and exploit networks and
infrastructure associated with the recent U.S. election, as well as a range of U.S. government, political and private
sector entities.

The report does not provide any evidence that the tools and infrastructure were used to influence the outcome of the US
presidential election.

The report is simply a description of what is said to be Russian capabilities .

Related: DHS/FBI Issues Joint Analysis Report: GRIZZLY STEPPE Russian Malicious Cyber Activity

Moreover, the report begins with this disclaimer: DISCLAIMER: This report is provided as is for informational purposes
only. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any information
contained within.

Related: GRIZZLY STEPPE Russian Malicious Cyber Activity

In other words, the report not only provides no evidence of the use of the Russian tools and infrastructure in order to
influence the US presidential election, the report will not even warrant the correctness of its description of Russian
capabilities.
Related: 18 Major Scandals in Obamas Scandal-Free Presidency

Thus the DHS report makes it completely clear that the Obama regime has no evidential basis for its allegations on the
basis of which it has imposed more sanctions on Russia.

What is going on here?

First there is the question of the legality of the sanctions even if there were evidence. I am not certain, but I think that
sanctions require the action of a body, such as the UN Security Council, and cannot legally be imposed unilaterally by one
country. Additionally, it is unclear why Obama is calling the expulsion of Russian diplomats sanctions.

No other country has to do likewise. During the Cold War when diplomats were expelled for spying, it was not called
sanctions. Sanctions imply more than unilateral or bilateral expulsions of diplomats.

Second, it is clear that Obama, the CIA, and the New York Times are fully aware that the allegation is false. It is also clear
that if the CIA actually believes the allegation, the intelligence agency is totally incompetent and cannot be believed on any
subject.

Third, President Trump can rescind the sanctions in 21 days, a third reason that the sanctions are ridiculous.

So why are President Obama, the CIA, and the New York Times making charges that they know are false and for
which they have not produced a shred of evidence?
Related: Soros Launches Plan to Bring Down US and Israel

One obvious answer is that the neoconized Obama regime is desperate to ruin US-Russian relations past the point that
Trump can repair them. As the New York Times puts it;

Mr. Obamas actions clearly create a problem for Mr. Trump. The question the New York Times says, is whether
Trump stands with his democratic allies on Capitol Hill or his authoritarian friend in the Kremlin.

Can Trumps foreign policy be controlled by false allegations?

According to the New York Times, Trump has relented and agreed to being briefed by the CIA about the Russian hacking
now that Republicans such as Paul Ryan, John McCain, and Lindsey Graham have lined up with Obama and the CIA in
accepting charges for which no evidence has been presented.

However, a briefing without evidence would seem simply to further discredit the CIA in Trumps eyes.

As I have emphasized in my columns, facts no longer have a role in the United States and its empire. Allegations alone
suffice, whether in court cases, interrogation centers, foreign and domestic policies, or classrooms.

The US even bases its military invasions on false allegations - weapons of mass destruction. Indeed, the entirely
of US foreign policy since the Clinton regime has been based on nothing but false allegations.

The Russian government should have learned by now, but perhaps Moscow still thinks that facts matter in Washingtons
decisions.

Possibly we should consider that more is going on than meets the eye. Perhaps the propaganda about the Russian cyber
threat to democracy is being used to prepare American and/or European populations for an incident.

The CIA has morphed into a deep state that uses disinformation and propaganda to align decisions of Congress, the
executive branch, and foreign governments with secret behind-the-scenes agendas. Many books, such as Stephen
Kinzers The Brothers and Douglas Valentines CIA As Organized Crime have described some of these secret agendas.
Related: Trumans True Warning on the CIA

In order to deter Trump from restoring normal relations with Russia, an incident would have to be severe and irreversible.
Rather than accept defeat for their agenda of US world hegemony, the neoconservatives are prepared to take high risks.
The willingness to take risks is demonstrated by the public effort of the CIA Director to discredit the president-elect.

As expected, Putins response to the latest provocation is low key as the sanctions appear to be meaningless on the
surface.

Related: Stephen Lendman Reports President Putins Response To Obamas New Sanctions

However, in the event that something dangerous is below the surface, the Russian government might want to consider
putting its military forces on alert.

Related Articles:

Stephen Lendman Reports President Putins Response To Obamas New Sanctions

Obama Retaliates Against Russians Over Purported Cyberattack, But Is There a Double Standard?

Russia sanctions childish, petulant & pointless revenge for Clinton loss UKs ex-Syria envoy

Russia Responds To Obama On Expelled Diplomats: New Hostile Steps Will Receive An Answer

Plane with Russian diplomats expelled from US lands in Moscow

Washingtons Intent is Economic Destabilization and Regime Change In Venezuela


Rescuing Boris - TIME Magazine, 1996

Russia to Obama: Put up or Shut Up

HuffPo Turns On Obama: He Presided Over The "Destruction Of The Democratic Party"

Refugees Surge 86% Year on Year: Ahead of Trump Presidency Obama Rushes Muslim Refugees into US

Benjamin Netanyahu SLAMS Obama and Kerry In Fiery Response

Seven Ways Obama Is Trying To Sabotage The Trump Administration

President Barack Obamas final weeks in office seem dedicated to setting foreign and domestic
policy on fire to make life as difficult as possible on his successor, Donald Trump.

Here are some of the biggest mousetraps Obama scattered across the White House floor on his way out:

Related: Assange: Obama Is Obviously Trying To Delegitimize Trump - Wikileaks founder says source of email
hack is '1000% Not Russia'

1. Betraying Israel at the United Nations: Obamas refusal to block a United Nations vote against Israel, his
administrations shadowy machinations to bring that ugly motion to the floor, and Secretary of State John Kerrys long-
winded broadside against Israel will leave President Trump with a massive political crisis in the Middle East, and quite
possibly a security crisis, if terror groups and their political wings are emboldened by the rebuke of Israel.

Obamas Israel maneuver also damages American credibility, teaching would-be allies that the United States is not the best
friend to have. Americas erstwhile battlefield allies in Syria can teach the same lesson, assuming any of them are left alive
to take the podium.
This comes at the very moment aspiring hegemons in China and Russia are showing their allies how Beijing and Moscow
will go to the mat for them.

Related: Obama Publishes $7.4 BILLION Worth Of Regulations In One Night

Obamas team thinks it was clever to saddle Trump with an international edict the U.S. president cannot easily reverse.
They might not have thought this all the way through, because some of the options that are available to Trump could leave
internationalists, and Palestinian leaders, cursing Barack Obamas memory.

Note that even some commentators friendly to Obama, and sources within the Obama Administration itself, have described
the Israel vote as a deliberate act of sabotage aimed at Trump, because Obama is alarmed by some of Trumps
appointees.

2. A New Cold War With Russia: After eight years of relentlessly mocking anyone who said Russia was a major
geopolitical threat to the United States (most famously including his 2012 presidential opponent, Mitt Romney) Barack
Obama suddenly realized: You know what? Russia is a major threat!
He also awoke to the dangers of cyber-warfare, after an entire presidency of treating electronic espionage as a purely
political problem to be minimized and spun away, because taking it seriously made him look bad. Who can forget how
Obama left victims of the OPM hack twisting in the wind for weeks, because the administration didnt want to admit how
serious the attack was?

But then a top Democrat political operative fell for a crude phishing scam, and the Democratic National Committee got
hacked, so Obama well, he still didnt take cyber-espionage seriously.

He slapped the snooze bar again, because as one anonymous official put it, they thought Hillary Clinton was a
cinch to win the 2016 election, so they were willing to kick the can down the road.

No, it was Hillary Clintons loss in the election, and the desperate push to damage President-elect Trumps legitimacy, that
made the president who politely ignored China hacking 25 million American citizens private data get tough on information
security.

Tucker Carlson Destroys Leftist on Russian Election Hacking Claims

Related Articles:

Hannity Has Sit-Down Interview with Julian Assange It Was Not Russia

Robert Parry: John V. Whitbeck on the Criminal Insanity of the US Establishment Claiming Russians Hacked the
Election When It as the Establishment That Lost Under Its Own Byzantine Fraud-Friendly Rules

Intelligence Insider: Russian Hack Story Is A Giant Hoax

Robert Steele in Defence and Intelligence Norway: The Russians Did Not Hack the US Election a Few Facts
from a Former CIA Spy
Until now, states involved in cyber-espionage never got anything worse than a few carefully-chosen words of sour
disapproval from the expiring administration, but the Russkies received a sprinkling of sanctions, and 35 diplomats
were expelled.

Russia responded by unleashing an army of ducks and trolls from the depths of the Kremlin. The New Cold War is only a
few days old, and its already weirder than the old one was.

Presumably Obama thinks hes maneuvered Trump into a position that will make whatever rapprochement he might have
entertained with Moscow more difficult, or at least more politically costly for the new President.

Related: Buoyant Putin and Sinking Western Mis-Leaders

The end result might be easier relations between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and a lingering memory of
how little Barack Obama cared about cybersecurity until it was politically expedient for him to freak out.

3. Ban on Oil Drilling: An overt act of sabotage directed at the American economy itself, leaving an especially heavy
bootprint on Alaska. Smug administration flacks spent the past couple of weeks assuring media talking heads that
Obamas unprecedented abuse of an obscure law was impossible for his successor to reverse.

Its like they stayed up all night, looking for executive actions that cant be undone by the new President four weeks later.

(Amusingly, Obama dropped this bomb on our energy sector just a few weeks after publicly advising Trump not to abuse
executive orders.)

Its likely that legions of lawyers will battle throughout 2017, and perhaps beyond, to determine if Obamas latest poke at
Trump (as Politico put it) really is irreversible. What a lovely parting gift from the departing President to the country that
elected him twice: a pile of gigantic wealth-destroying lawsuits!

4. National-Monument Land Grab: The other theoretically irreversible presidential edict discovered by Obamas
munchkins is the ability to designate national monuments. Another 1.65 million acres in Utah and Nevada was yanked off
the market in the last week of December, bring Obamas Antiquities Act acreage up to an unprecedented 553 million acres.
Related: Obama seizes Bundy Ranch area in massive last minute land grab

"This arrogant act by a lame duck president will not stand. I will work tirelessly with Congress and the incoming
Trump administration to honor the will of the people of Utah and undo this designation, thundered Senator Mike
Lee of Utah.

Sixty-five percent of his state is now under the wise and compassionate environmental protection of the same government
that turned the Colorado River into a toxic-waste dump.

5. Eliminating the National Immigration Registry: Just in case Trump got any ideas about using it as the basis for the
enhanced vetting he has promised for immigrants from terrorist-infested regions, the Obama administration killed a long-
dormant program called NSEERS that once committed the unforgivable politically-incorrect sin of tracking military-age males
from violently unstable Muslim-majority countries.

Its highly debatable whether the NSEERS program was of any practical use. When it pulled the plug, the Department of
Homeland Security noted that the post-9/11 program called for collecting data that is now routinely collected for most foreign
visitors, along with more sophisticated biometric information.

Almost everyone saw the elimination of these roles as a purely symbolic act - i.e. political sabotage directed at the incoming
President.

6. The Great Guantanamo Jailbreak: After paying little more than lip service to his promise to close the Guantanamo Bay
prison for much of his presidency, Obama went into overdrive in his last years, transferring over 150 detainees. A shocking
number of them ended up back on the battlefield.

Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA) of the House Foreign Affairs Committee wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed this week to sound the
alarm about Obamas midnight push to empty out Guantanamo.

The White House has repeatedly released detainees to countries it knew lacked the intent and capability to keep
the detainees from returning to terrorism. The results have been deadly, Royce wrote, challenging the wisdom of
such Obama administration brainstorms as dropping al-Qaedas top bomb maker into Bosnia, a country with
limited security services but plenty of radical mosques and unemployed military-age males.
Related: 2017: The Year Of Microchipping Americans. The Law Was Just Passed

Royces committee has been investigating allegations the administration tried to pay the bomb-maker $100,000 to refrain
from passing his deadly skills along to eager apprentices. Hunting down the rest of the transferred prisoners who transferred
themselves right back into the global jihad will be a job for the Trump administration.

7. Depicting Trumps Election as a Disaster: Lets not forget Obamas acts of rhetorical sabotage, such as describing
Trumps presidential campaign as a crime against American class and racial harmony, or his wife wailing that all hope was
lost for Americas children. Trump himself has taken note of the many inflammatory President Obama statements and
roadblocks.

Its hard to remember a previous instance of the outgoing president attacking the legitimacy of his successor this way,
especially during the transition, before the new chief executive has actually done anything.

And its probably not over yet. The time for big executive orders is growing short, but Obama is always just one day away
from calling a press conference and saying something else that will make the transition more difficult.

Alex Jones To Announce Who Really Hacked the DNC


Of course he can still talk all he wants after January 20th, and hes given every indication he wont follow the dignified path
of his predecessors and allow the new president time to chart his own course, but theres no substitute for the bully pulpit of
the presidency.

The timber of Barack Obamas political voice will be very different on January 21st than it was on January 19th. More likely
than not, hell use it before he loses it.

Related: Obamas legacy of debt and disease: National debt doubles in just eight years while 10.7 million more
Americans now on food stamps to buy cancer-causing junk foods

Erdogan Says He Has "Confirmed Evidence" The US Supports ISIS + US Senator Says
ISIS Used As Tool By Saudis, US & Turkey When It Suits Their Interests
January 4 2017 | From: Zerohedge / RT

One year after this website demonstrated that Turkey was cooperating with the Islamic State, in the
very least trading cash in exchange for crude oil sold to various Turkish outposts (a trade which
was subsequently ended by the Russian air force), Turkey has flipped the tables and on Tuesday
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said he has uncovered evidence that US-led coalition
forces have helped support terrorists in Syria - including Isis.
"They give support to terrorist groups including ISIS" Erdogan said during a speech in Ankara on Tuesday, adding that
US coalition forces "give support to terrorist groups including Daesh, YPG, PYD. It's very clear. We have confirmed
evidence, with pictures, photos and videos."

Related: Erdogans Accusations re US Supporting Terrorists A Parting Shot For Obama

Which, incidentally, should also not come a surprise in light of the May 2015 declassified Pentagon report, which claimed
that ISIS was created as a Pentagon tool to overthrow Syria's president Assad.

Its very clear that the US-led coalition is supporting terrorist groups in Syria, Islamic State. They give
support to terrorist groups including Daesh (Arabic for IS).

We have confirmed evidence, with pictures, photos and videos.

- Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Related: Absolutely Stunning: Leaked Audio of Secretary Kerry Reveals Obama Intentionally Allowed Rise of ISIS

Nevertheless, the "pot calling the kettle black" comes at a sensitive time for both the US and Turkey, which are both pivoting
aggressively, one internally from Obama to Trump, while the other is shifting its foreign geopolitical allegiance from the US
to Russia, which may also explain today's outburst by Erdogan.
Related: Erdogan tells Israel: "We see Western weapons in Daesh hands"

Saying that the US have accused Turkey of supporting IS, speaking at a press conference on Tuesday the Turkish leader
blamed the US-led coalition for assisting terrorists themselves. Apart from IS, he also mentioned Kurdish People's
Protection Units in northern Syria (YPG) and Democratic Union Party (PYD) as groups supported by the coalition.

Earlier on Tuesday, Moscow accused Washington of "sponsoring terrorism" in Syria.

Commenting on the latest National Defense Authorization Act signed into law by President Barack Obama, the Russian
Foreign Ministry pointed out that the new bill "openly stipulates the possibility" of delivering more weapons to Syria, and
added that those arms "will soon find their way to the jihadists," which Russia would view as a "hostile act."

Erdogan's comments echoed those from the Iranian Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan, who told RT that Washington
appears unready to play a serious role in fighting Islamic State, as it has fostered terrorists itself and now wants them
to remain in the Middle East.

"The Western coalition is of a formal nature, they have no real intention to fight neither in Syria nor in Iraq. We
dont see any readiness on their part to play a truly useful and meaningful role in fighting IS, because its them who
have raised terrorists and they are interested in keeping them there, Dehghan said.

According to the Iranian defense minister, Tehran has never coordinated its operations with the Americans and will never
collaborate with them.
He then slammed the US' motives behind the "war on ISIS' saying that:

"Maybe the coalition forces would like to see terrorists weakened, but certainly not destroyed, because those
terrorists are their tool for destabilizing this region and some other parts of the world.

One wonders how long before Putin is blamed for this latest political scandal, because if indeed Erdogan does provide proof
of US support for the Islamic State, then the Pentagon will need a back story very fast, and what better scapegoat than the
Russian president.

US Senator Says ISIS Used As Tool By Saudis, US & Turkey When It Suits Their
Interests

Speaking to RT on the advance of ISIS militants from Mosul toward Palmyra, Virginia Senator
Richard Black (R) expressed doubt that the US-led coalition could have overlooked such a
regrouping, pointing to possible interests of the US and regional players.
Given that the territory between areas occupied by Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) and Palmyra is a very
barren rocky desert, it is unconceivable that the American-led collation could not have seen this massive army
moving towards Palmyra, Senator Black told RT.

Related: Congresswoman Says US Is Arming ISIS, Introduces Bill to Stop It

"The Western coalition is of a formal nature, they have no real intention to fight neither in Syria nor in Iraq. We
dont see any readiness on their part to play a truly useful and meaningful role in fighting IS, because its them who
have raised terrorists and they are interested in keeping them there, Dehghan said.

I was surprised that ISIS was able to attack Palmyra. Its important to recognize that the distance from ISIS-held territory
[to] Palmyra is approximately 100 miles, added the senator, who has repeatedly voiced support for Syrian President Bashar
Assad in battling the jihadists.

The fact that the US-led coalition seemingly turned a blind eye to the imminent terrorist threat to the UNESCO world
heritage site is not a coincidence, he argues, but rather a part of the foreign policy strategy employed by the current White
House administration towards Islamic State.

Unfortunately, I believe, under the Obama administration, I think there have been great deal of coordination between
terrorist forces and the US-led coalition, Black said.

While the US, as well as other western countries and major regional players, do not share the same goals as the terrorists,
they have been seemingly sparing Islamic State if airstrikes against the terrorist group could have resulted in disadvantage
to Turkey, the key NATO member in the region and a US ally, which Black alleges, has engaged in economic relations with
terrorists.

Related: Decamped from Mosul ISIS fighters in Syria perfect for US narrative
There [the terrorists] have not been loved by anyone, but they have been a major trading partner of Turkey, and
the United States withheld any attack when they first seized Palmyra travelling a hundred miles over open territory,
and, I confirm, there was not a single bomb dropped by the American-led coalition, he said.

This very selective approach to fighting terrorists gives reason to suggest that the US-led coalition is battling jihadists only
when it does not interfere with the narrow interests of its members, Black suggests, dubbing the coalitions efforts under
such circumstances as disastrously unproductive.

I think ISIS is often used as a tool between Turkey and the United States and as long as they are useful to one of
those parties they are protected and when they are not useful they are not protected, Black said, arguing that ISIS
served as tool of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United States and NATO forcesfrom the very beginning of
the conflict in Syria.

At the same time, the senator commended the US-led offensive in Iraq, which has centered on liberating its second largest
city, Mosul, from militants, saying that the coalition was doing some very good work in Mosul and seems to be genially
poised to drive ISIS forces from Mosul.

Related: 'CIA created ISIS', says Julian Assange as Wikileaks releases 500k US cables

However, US President Barack Obamas recent decision to lift restrictions on the delivery of weapons to:

"Foreign forces, irregular forces, groups or individuals, who are supported by US military in Syria, plays into the
hands of terrorists and looks like a desperate last attempt by the outgoing administration, Black said.
The senator said that the looming change of commander-in-chief in the United States will be marked by a U-turn in Syria,
with the US cutting all its ties with militants.

When Donald Trump comes in, the support is going to be cut for the terrorists. We are not going on to the side of
the terrorists anymore, he said.

Sen. Black has been known as a fierce critic of the current US policy towards Syria, calling it insane in comments to the
Washington Post in April, when he argued that it is within our power to stop the bloodshed.

Related: Actress Angelina Jolie Humiliates Obama for the Whole World to See

In April, Black traveled to Palmyra and met with Syrian government officials. He has said that Syria being entrapped in the
military conflict is not the result of domestic issues but of a plot contrived by foreign intelligence, including that of the western
countries, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

The government and people in Syria want peace, but regional countries dont, Black told Homs Governor Talal
Barazi at the time, as cited by the Syria Times.

New Zealand's Israel Resolution: Peacemakers Seldom Win Friends


December 26 2016 | From: MSN
A UN Security Council resolution, calling for a ban on illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied
territories, has passed, with NZ taking a major role. Phil Smith outlines the background and the
blowback.

New Zealand has dared to go where even Egypt's strongman, President el-Sisi, feared to tread.

Related: How Britain wrought destruction on the Palestinian homeland

Abdel Fattah el-Sisi put a forward a resolution demanding an end to Israeli settlement building, but after an incredibly
inappropriate call from Donald Trump, el-Sisi withdrew it again. Exactly how Trump achieved that is anyone's guess, but
America's $1.5 billion aid package to Egypt may have been threatened.

President el-Sisi said he wanted to let Trump's incoming administration have first crack at the issue. It was obviously an
excuse. Trump's nomination for Ambassador to Israel is a hardliner who wants more settlement construction and who has
compared Jews who advocate for a 'two-state peace' to Capos (Jews who assisted in Nazi death-camps).

When el-Sisi retreated, New Zealand stepped up. Together with Venezuela, Malaysia and Senegal, New Zealand called for a
vote on the resolution, and for the first time since the Carter administration, the US declined to veto a rebuke over illegal
Israeli settlements.
The US noted that settlement construction had accelerated since the US vetoed a similar resolution in 2001, and that the
Obama administration has been warning Israel for eight years that this 'trend-line' was both making peace more difficult and
isolating Israel from the international community.

The Foundations of the Settlements

Settling population in militarily-occupied territory is contrary to the Geneva Convention, to international law and previous
United Nations rulings.

Settlement building is usually strategic. Settlements create 'facts-on-the-ground', making it more difficult to give back captured
territory (in this case, territory captured during the 1967 Six Day War). Hardliners believe the territory is theirs by God-given
right, but its return, at least in part, would be necessary for a lasting peace based on a two-state solution.

The tracts that are currently Palestinian controlled areas are an unworkable, disconnected patchwork of territories.

Related: Top Israeli General Speaks Out Against Israels Crimes Against Palestinians + Parallels Between Israel &
1930's Germany & Ten Facts Why Netanyahu Is A Criminal And That Israel Is A Rogue State

Settlements also increase local conflict by expropriating land and resources to construct and sustain the townships. Moderate
Israeli administrations have tended to restrict or demolish settlements, while hawkish governments look the other way, or - like
the current one - are gung-ho on expansions which push Palestinians into an ever-diminishing corner.
Related: Water war against Palestinians: Israel planned to supply West Bank with 40% less water than settlers

Former US President Jimmy Carter has repeatedly stressed that peace in Israel/Palestine is only likely when the Palestinians
also have a viable state, where middle class citizens have a reason to hope and work for a future. Some form of two state
solution has been American policy for decades.

Seeing this may be about to change, and after significant antagonism from Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, President Obama
apparently believes it is time to allow a line in the sand.

Kiwi Peace-Broker

A few years ago, after the successful Bougainville peace talks, New Zealand imagined a role for itself as an international
peace broker. It was a nice idea that turned out to be harder than it sounded, but it marked an increased New Zealand
confidence to act independently, for good purpose.

This week's action is a further brave step from New Zealand. It has no obvious ulterior motives, but instead seems an attempt
to simply do the right thing and bugger the consequences.
A nation like New Zealand cannot throw its feather-weight around internationally in order to win friends. Frequently, the
opposite is achieved. A friend won with one action is alienated with the next, and nations often remember sleights more
strongly than support.

The Blowback

The blowback has already begun. Israel is apoplectic and has recalled its envoys to New Zealand and Senegal, and stopped
its Senegal aid programme. It called the resolution "despicable" and "an evil decree". The Israeli Ambassador to the UN said
the vote was "a victory for terror, a victory for hatred and violence."

New Zealand was already in Israel's bad books. In 2014 Israel refused to accept New Zealand's ambassador because he was
also to act as an envoy to the Palestinian Authority. In October 2015, Israeli officials reprimanded our Ambassador after New
Zealand dared propose a Security Council resolution that dared encourage a return to peace negotiations. Palestinian
supporters were equally upset, seeing the wording as supporting Israel.

But this time is worse. Israeli-New Zealand relations haven't been so poor since 2004, when New Zealand imprisoned
'Mossad spies' for attempting to fraudulently obtain a New Zealand passport. After a year, Israel apologised and
relationships were slowly mended.
Related: Israeli ministers okay draft bill to legalize Jewish settlements on private Palestinian land despite Supreme
Court ruling

This new rift may take longer. Much of the anger is being directed at the US, where President Obama could have chosen to
veto the resolution.

But Netanyahu's conservative government will not take kindly to us fronting a resolution that pointedly calls East
Jerusalem "occupied Palestinian territory".

New Zealand's government will have known blowback was likely. It has decided that, if you ask to be on the Security Council
you need to appear from behind the parapet and take a stand.

In an era where the world's mood seems to be trending towards resentment, aggression and extremism, a country wins few
friends by calling for tolerance or asking for restraint. But that doesn't mean that working for peace and goodwill isn't the right
thing to do.

Fear, Bloodshed And Human Sacrifices Before Winter Solstice


December 22 2016 | From: VigilantCitizen

The killing of an ambassador in Turkey on live television and the attack of a Christmas market in
Berlin occurred at a crucial time of year.
The Russian ambassador with his killer standing behind him, moments before the gunshot

On December 19th 2016, Donald Trump was officially confirmed as President of the United States by the Electoral
College. Media coverage of this event was however eclipsed by attacks that ironically confirm why he was elected in
the first place. And these attacks will most likely greatly influence upcoming elections in Germany, France and the
Netherlands. A drastic change in political scenery is in the horizon, and it is fueled by fear, bloodshed and rejection
of globalism.

Related: Putin vows to destroy ISIL after ambassador killed

The assassination of a Russian ambassador on live television and the violent attack of a Christmas market in Germany are
events that are not only violent, but charged with intense symbolism meant to shock the public mind.

Whether this was coincidental or not, these events occurred right on the brink of the winter solstice a period that is historically
prone to blood sacrifices as it is a minor Sabbath in the occult calendar. Before Christmas, there was Saturnalia.

The origins of Christmas predate Christianity through the Pagan holiday called Saturnalia, which was a week-long
of lawlessness from December 17th through December 25th that honored Saturn and included human sacrifice,
intoxication, naked caroling and rape. During these seven days, there were no punishments for breaking any laws,
according to Roman law.

- In5d, Esoteric Meaning of Christmas

It was traditional to offer gifts of imitation fruit (a symbol of fertility), dolls (symbolic of the custom of human
sacrifice), and candles (reminiscent of the bonfires traditionally associated with pagan solstice celebrations). A
mock king was chosen, usually from a group of slaves or criminals, and although he was permitted to behave in an
unrestrained manner for seven days of the festival, he was usually killed at the end.

The Saturnalia eventually degenerated into a week-long spree of debauchery and crime giving rise to the
modern use of the tern saturnalia, meaning a period of unrestrained license and revelry.
- Time and Date, Holidays and Traditions around the December solstice

On December 19th, the entire world witnessed a live murder, a carefully planned sacrifice.

The Russian Ambassador

Andrey Karlov, Russias ambassador to Turkey was shot dead on Monday evening as he delivered a speech at a photo
exposition. The killer, identified as Mert Altintas, was an off-duty member of Ankaras police force.

The entire scene was extremely surreal because, beyond the violence, it was visually perfect. It was a set piece made for
mass media.

Related: Russian Officials: Highly Likely Ambassador Assassination a NATO False Flag

Mert Altintas stood behind the ambassador, wearing a stylishly tailored black suit, which sharply contrasted with the
immaculate white background adorned with pictures of Russia. Several gunshots then wring out and the ambassador falls on
his back, suddenly lifeless. The gunman then walks around the body, yelling Allahu Akbar and Dont forget Aleppo until
police finally manages to reach him and shoot him down.
As one reviews this surreal scene, one wonders: How was this even allowed to happen? How come this 22-year-old, off-duty
cop, who is part of the riot squad, was the only person standing behind Karlov this entire time? Reports are now saying that
the gunman refused security check.

The off-duty police officer who assassinated Russias ambassador to Turkey refused to go through an X-ray
security check before the shooting - but was let into the event anyway, according to a report.

The Hurriyet Daily News reported Tuesday that the assassin, Mevlt Mert Altintas, simply flashed his police ID to
enter Ankaras Contemporary Arts Center - where Russian Ambassador Andrey Karlov was scheduled to speak at
a photo exhibition.

- Daily News, Assassin of Turkeys Russian ambassador refused security check before ambushing event

Related: Putin Assures Envoy Karlovs Murderers to Feel the Heat of Russian Response

Also, all signs point to the attack being ordered from above, Mert Altintas being the proverbial patsy.

It had been determined Tuesday if Altintas, 22, was part of a wider plan to take out the Russian ambassador. But
a senior Turkish official told the Associated Press Altintas likely did not act alone. The official, speaking
anonymously, called the killing fully professional, not a one-man action.

- Ibid.

Turkish authorities suspect that Altintas was under the influence of Fetullah Gulen, a Turkish preacher who is currently based
in the United States, in Pennsylvania. He is suspected of being a CIA operative conducting operations meant to
destabilize Erdogans government.

Although some draw comparisons between this event and the assassination that lead to WWI, it is unlikely that the killing will
cause significant change. It will most likely justify the Russian-Turkish involvement in Syria.

Berlin Attack
The truck used to conduct the attack with Christmas decorations stuck on the windshield. Sadly symbolic

Related: Statement from President-Elect Donald J. Trump on the Attack in Berlin

Around the same time the assassination occurred in Turkey, a horrific attack took place in Berlin killing 12 people and 48
others.

What authorities can say for certain is that a tractor-trailer with Polish license plates and laden with steel rods
jumped a sidewalk around 8 p.m. Monday and plowed into the market near the Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church, a
symbolic Berlin site whose spire, jagged from bomb damage, was intentionally left unrepaired after World War II.

- NY Times, Berlin Christmas Market Was Target of Terrorist Attack, Angela Merkel Says

This event was also charged with symbolic meaning. It was not simply about killing people, it was an attack on German
culture, history and tradition. Christmas markets are a German tradition originating from the Middle Ages where locals shop for
various goods while getting into the Christmas spirit.

The market that was attacked is situated near the Kaiser Wilheml Memorial church, a symbolic piece of German history.
Related: The CIA Strikes Again?

The truck and the wreckage it caused at the foot of the Church. Although not all Germans are religious, the building remains a
piece of local history.

This bloody attack is therefore custom-built to anger the German population who have to witness a beloved tradition being
turned into a bloodbath by terrorists.

This anger might very well translate into votes against Merkel (and her open-door policy to refugees) in the upcoming
elections. It might also influence the French elections where Le Pen is gaining traction.

At the time of writing this article, Berlin police detains a suspect who is said to be a refugee from Pakistan. However, police
also stated that they might have the wrong person and that the true culprit might still be on the run. No matter who finally gets
arrested, ultimate losers will be citizens who will have to suffer through even more scrutiny, monitoring and surveillance for
more security.
The elites motto is Ordo Ab Chao (Order Out of Chaos) and Merkels policy brought to Germany great deal of chaos. Now
people will crave for order. And that order might come at a terrible price.

In Conclusion

The two events described above were not only about killing people. They were about sending a message. They were charged
with symbolic meaning custom made for mass media and social networks.

These events occurred at a sensitive time of the year, the winter solstice, a minor Sabbath, historically celebrated with human
sacrifice. Whether this date was intentionally selected or not, the entire world was forced to witness a planned killing, a ritual
sacrifice carried out methodically as the killer screamed God is Great.

Fake News Hysteria Hinges On The Laughable Assumption That Corporate-Run Media Has A
Divine Monopoly On Facts + US Lawmakers Move To Criminalize Fake News, Propaganda On The
Web
December 14 2016 | From: NaturalNews / Sputnik/ Various

The insidious assumption behind the fake news accusations being flung far and wide by the
fakestream media (CNN, NPR, WashPost, NYT, MSNBC, etc.) is that somehow the corporate media
has a divine monopoly on facts.

The Cabal Establishment is in Panic Mode as Alternative Media Blasts the Controlled-Mainstream
Media Out of the Water - the Corporate Media Lies are Being Exposed Virally, Worldwide.
The assumption is ludicrously demonstrated when MSNBC rolls out convicted liar Brian Williams to decry fake
news.

Related: Fake News: Who is Really Making the War on Truth?

Youd be hard pressed to find any fake news propagandist who churned out more fake news than Brian Williams and hes
still working at MSNBC!

Back in early 2015, Breitbart News presented a list of at least 32 times that NBC News let Williams present such fake news to
the American people - lies and disputed stories - including his false claims about being in a helicopter that was hit by an
RPG, reports Breitbart.com, one of the new media giants accused of publishing fake news by the collapsing lamestream
media.

As long as the government engages in intelligence activities that violate our rights secured by our Constitution,
any Intel Authorization bill should be opposed, Justin Amash told Sputnik News.

Williams also made up stories about Seal Team 6, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Pope, Hurricane Katrina, quitting
college, rescuing a puppy from a house fire, and more, Breitbart continues.

If the Media Establishment Only Tells the Truth, Why are so Many of Their News Reports Obviously
Faked?

If the corporate-run media really had some sort of divine monopoly on facts, then none of us would be able to find examples
of laughably fake news on their websites, would we? Yet even the Washington Post has now been exposed for, if you can
believe it, faking a news story about fake news!

Any honest investigation can go right down the list: CNN, NYT, WashPost, HuffPost, LA Times, USA Today, NPR, MSNBC,
Fox News and so on every one of these news organizations has run genuinely fake news while claiming it was
fact.
Its not even difficult to find examples of these organizations deliberately fabricating fake news in order to alter the outcome of
the recent election.

Nearly all of them reported, for example, some variation of the absurd claim that Donald Trump cant win the
election.

These are also the same fake news organizations that obediently and enthusiastically repeated Obamas fabricated claims
about Obamacare. Remember If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor?

Or how about the claim that Obamacare will save American families $2500 a year, on average? Not only were these glaring
examples of fake news, they were known to be false at the time they were published by the corporate-run media.

Another way the Media Fakes the News: Censorship of Important Stories they Dont Want you to
Learn

And then there are the stories the entire fakestream media censors because they dont want anyone to learn about actual
facts. As a particularly egregious example, it is an established fact that CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson publicly admitted
to falsifying scientific data at the CDC to obscure the statistical link between vaccines and autism in African-Americans. That is
not only indisputable, its also an incredibly important piece of news for the health of all Americans.
Did the fakestream media cover that story? Not by a long shot: They censored it.

Every single fakestream media organization across the country obediently blackballed the story. The censorship was
obviously coordinated, deliberate and malicious. Remember, censorship of important facts is another way the insidious
corporate-run media lies to its misinformed viewers.

Hilarious Videos of CNN Staging Fake Locations, Fake Missile Attacks and Fake Seafaring

CNN has forever used fakery, theatrics and false reporting to influence public opinion rather than report the news. Perhaps the
most hilarious example of dishonest CNN fakery is the Charles Jaco video from the first Gulf War.

In order to pretend to be covering the Gulf War from a live set in Saudi Arabia, CNN built a Saudi stage in the USA and
faked a SCUD missile attack on its news anchor Charles Jaco.

Hilarious, as the video shows below, while Charles Jaco grabs a gas mask, his co-anchor grabs a helmet (see the 7:00 mark
in the video below). Its funnier than a really bad SNL skit!

Remember, this was all broadcast as CNN Live, where CNN literally pretended this was all real and true.

Faking the news is a specialty of CNN, and there are countless examples of the network going out of its way to stage fake
sets, fake locations and even use actors following mass shootings to make sure the proper narrative is delivered to the
public.

For example, this video interview reveals a comprehensive collection of CNN news fakery such as the bizarre
moment when CNN anchors try to pretend they are not in the same parking lot.

That incident, detailed in this UK Daily Mail article, involved a CNN anchor and guest desperately trying to pretend they were
broadcasting live from distant locations when, in reality, they were in the exact same parking lot. (This is evidenced by the
simple fact that the exact same vehicles pass behind them, in the exact same sequence)
CNN frequently uses green screens to fake locations.

The hilarious video below shows CNN building an entire fake ship on a green screen set to try to create the illusion that their
reporter is on the scene in the Black Sea, covering US war ships near Ukraine.

During the hilariously bad fake set report, the CNN journalist even points off in the distance behind him to try to
make the green screen illusion more convincing:

Youll discover another jaw-dropping compilation of fake, scripted news from the mainstream media in this next
video, covering media fakery involving the Gulf War, the defamation of Ron Paul, 9/11 attacks, Bin Laden and more:

The entire Sandy Hook mass shooting narrative was deeply layered in all sorts of CNN fakery, including the use of actors
who were told to read lines to the cameras while sobbing uncontrollably for maximum effect.

Related: Censorship Shock: Amazon.com Bans Investigative Book Nobody Died At Sandy Hook Because It
Disagrees With Government Version Of What Happened

In one case, a cheerful white man is laughing it up in the background, then when signaled to approach the
microphone to speak on camera, starts hyperventilating and crying while reading his obviously scripted lines. (The
guy turns out to be a professional actor.)

In the same video, shown below, another actor is caught on a hot mic asking, Do you want me to read the card? right before
sobbing on camera, playing the part of a grieving parent.

Yet another Sandy Hook theatrical fake news hoax was the use of David Wheeler, a professional actor, as both a
grieving parent and a SWAT team sniper.

As with all the other actors rolled out for CNNs cameras, this professional actor performed a scripted role in order to evoke
a powerful emotional response with the sole purpose of repealing the Second Amendment (a necessary step before
America can be overrun and controlled by radical leftist communists).

The way he carries his sniper rifle (upside down, by the magazine) makes it laughably obvious to anyone familiar
with firearms that he has absolutely no clue how to carry a rifle

The Corporate-Run Media has Done Nothing but Fake the News for Decades

Search YouTube for terms like CNN green screen or crisis actors or Sandy Hook or faked news and you can spend
hour and after watching clear examples of outlandish news fakery by the mainstream media. It doesnt take long for any
intelligent, clear thinking individual to realize the mainstream media has been faking the news for decades.
CNN, in fact, can be best described as a fake news theater organization pretending to be engaged in legitimate journalism.

I even recorded a podcast on this very subject, discussing all the news fakery weve all been subjected to over the years by
the deliberate fabrications of the corporate-controlled media.

Come to think of it, you probably need to go back and revisit what you think is really true about many historic events covered
by the lying media: Oklahoma City, 9/11, Sandy Hook, the assassination of JFK and even the nuking of Japan in World War
II.

In every case, what was reported by the lying mainstream media was a scripted narrative, not a serious investigation into
what really happened.

Related Articles:
Whos Behind PropOrNots Blacklist of News Websites

Whos the Biggest Peddler of Fake News?

Denzel Washington Slams Mainstream Media For Peddling BS

Reddit Shadow Bans Infowars As Fake News War Accelerates

How the mainstream medias fake news undermines democracy and protects the corrupt establishment

Facebook, Google, Twitter, YouTube: A Spirit of Cooperation

Trump Labels CNN Fake News

US Lawmakers Move To Criminalize Fake News, Propaganda On The Web

The witch hunt for fake news and Russian propaganda has been kicked up a notch, after the
House passed a bill quietly tucked inside the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017,
designed to crack down on free speech and independent media.
Under "Title V - Matters relating to foreign countries, the bill seeks to "counter active measures by Russia to exert
covert influence carried out in coordination with, or at the behest of, political leaders or the security services of
the Russian Federation and the role of the Russian Federation has been hidden or not acknowledged publicly.

It lists media manipulation as:

Establishment or funding of a front group

Covert broadcasting

Media manipulation

Disinformation and forgeries

Funding agents of influence

Incitement and offensive counterintelligence

Assassinations

Terrorist acts

It is easy to see how this law, if passed by the Senate and signed by the president, could be used to
target, threaten, or eliminate so-called fake news websites, a list which has been used to arbitrarily define
any website, or blog, that does not share the mainstream medias proclivity to serve as the Public
Relations arm of a given administration, - Global Research reported.

The frightening attack on speech and independent media was opposed by only 30 members of the House, including Tulsi
Gabbard, Thomas Massie, and Justin Amash - who stated that he fought against it.

As long as the government engages in intelligence activities that violate our rights secured by our
Constitution, any Intel Authorization bill should be opposed, Justin Amash told Sputnik News.
The bill must now pass through Senate, though a senior Rand Paul aide has told Sputnik News that the Senator is currently
holding the intelligence bill for several reasons - and that they are looking at this specific issue very closely.

Curiously, the bill which was passed on November 30, was introduced on November 22, two days before the Washington
Post published its Nov. 24 article citing experts who claim Russian propaganda helped Donald Trump get elected, Zero
Hedge noted.

The experts the newspaper cited was a group called PropOrNot, although it have refused to name the experts behind the
operation. The organization has promoted a Ukrainian hacker group on their Twitter feed.
PropOrNot also listed over 200 websites that they accuse of peddling Russian propaganda, including extremely popular news
websites on all sides of the political spectrum, including The Drudge Report, Zero Hedge, TruthOut, Sputnik News, and even
WikiLeaks.

Former presidential candidate Ron Pauls website is also mentioned in many of the articles on so-called fake news, an issue
that should be concerning to those who believe in free speech, including his son, Senator Rand Paul.

The elder Paul has long been a vocal supporter of freedom of speech, as it is enshrined in the Constitution of the United
States, and he and his supporters have repeatedly been the target of finger pointing and demonization.

In 2012, a risk-assessment report from a Missouri-based fusion center stated that support for Ron Paul's presidential bid was
a sign of membership in a domestic terrorist group."

Related: Washington Posts Piece on Fake News Promotes Fake List of Unreliable Sources
For purposes of this definition it does not matter whether the sites listed here are being knowingly directed and paid by
Russian intelligence officers, or whether they even knew they were echoing Russian propaganda at any particular point: If
they meet these criteria, they are at the very least acting as bona-fide useful idiots of the Russian intelligence services, and
are worthy of further scrutiny, the so-called experts cited by PropOrNot state.

Many of those listed on censorship hit lists are speaking out against the attempt to stop independent media.

Information is dangerous and with this new reactionary shift of people making ban lists of so called fake
news, it shows us how afraid they are of knowledge and differences of opinion that spur people to have
an open mind, Luke Rudkowski, the owner of We Are Change, one of the sites on the blacklist, previously
told Sputnik News.

Information is very dangerous for the establishment status quo that tried to keep things the way they
are.

The bill, Zero Hedge notes, will soon proclaim much of the internet to be criminal Russian propaganda if it is allowed to pass.

Related Articles:
Congress Admits CIA Moving To Ban Free Speech In America

If You Are For Peace You Are A Russian Agent

Fake News Viewed as Move to Ban Dissenting Voices

MSM Takes Fake News To The Next Level

Why Labeling Websites As Russian Propaganda is Dangerous

Rothschilds Greater Israel Plan Is Effectively Defeated


December 12 2016 | From: Geopolitics

On the eve of the complete recovery of Aleppo City, Rothschild puppet Obama issued a rather
strange last minute attempt at saving the anti-Assad operation by granting a waiver for military
restrictions on the nature of war materiel aid to its proxies, i.e. moderate rebels and Al-Nusra
terror operatives.
A White House press release Thursday announced that foreign fighters in Syria supporting US special
operations to combat terrorism in Syria would be excused from restrictions on military assistance.

Related: 10 Signs The Global Elite Are Losing Control

I hereby determine that the transaction, encompassing the provision of defense articles and services to foreign
forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals engaged in supporting or facilitating ongoing U.S. military operations
to counter terrorism in Syria, is essential to the national security interests of the United States,President Obama
affirmed in the presidential determination and waiver.

The order delegates responsibility to the US secretary of state to work with and report to Congress on weapons export
proposals, requiring 15 days notice before they are authorized.

Obama announced a similar waiver of the Arms Export Control Act in September 2013, following the Ghouta chemical
attack in August of that year.

That order facilitated the transfer of US military weaponry to select vetted members of opposition forces battling Syrian
President Bashar Assad, while Thursdays order appears less narrow in scope.

Related: Obama grants waiver for military support of foreign fighters in Syria - White House

Why would he issue such 11th hour executive order after he admitted the US incapacity to topple the Talibans in
Afghanistan?
The most probable reason would be that once Aleppo is completely liberated, the full degree of US involvement on the ISIS
misadventures in Syria and Iraq would be exposed for all the world to see.

Civilians who escaped from terrorists talk about new crimes committed by militants of the so-called moderate
opposition in eastern Aleppo. Cases of torture, public executions and massacres of the population have been
confirmed.

Related: Syrian Army Controls 93% of Aleppo - Russian MoD

There wasnt any Plan B in Syria because there wasnt any need for it if only Hillary Clinton won the White House for the
Cabal.

All they could do now is to keep on imposing all sorts of sanctions against all Syrian allies as if they still control everything
just like before. Yet, while Russia and China have been buying more gold and other physical assets, the West keeps losing
on the economic front, and they just dont care because they, the policymakers, are all insulated from these crises.

While the politicians are barking at the Russian-led operations, US and EU companies are expressing their interest
in getting back to the Russian market.

Carter Page, a former adviser to US President-elect Donald Trumps presidential campaign, told Sputnik that US and
European companies are interested to get back to the Russian market.
Carter Page

There is a high level of interest amongst US as well as European companies to get back to the Russian market.
This interest cuts across a diverse array of sectors, Page told Sputnik.

He also commented on the recent Rosneft privatization deal. Page believes that efforts to punish the Russian oil
giant have backfired and primarily hurt Western companies:

The hostile efforts to punish Rosneft and their senior management team through Western sanctions have primarily
hurt Western companies, rather than their intended target. This weeks innovative transaction underscores these
constraints, as many other potential strategic investment partners were excluded, Page said.

Related: US, EU Companies Interested to Get Back to Russian Market - Trump's Ex-Adviser

The Obama desperate countermeasures to salvage the dire Daesh situation in Syria, and the expression of unwillingness on
the part of the business sector in the West are proof enough that the people are tired of wars and sanctions.

Still, tangible actions beyond the choice of lesser evil need to be done by the Europeans. The rise of the Pirate Party in
Iceland is a good template.

Elsewhere in Asia, the Khazarian Empire continues to lose some of its cooperative regimes. South Korean
President Park is impeached.

South Korean lawmakers voted overwhelmingly on Friday to impeach President Park Geun-hye over an influence-
peddling scandal, setting the stage for her to become the countrys first elected leader to be expelled from office in
disgrace.

The impeachment motion was carried by a wider-than-expect 234-56 margin in a secret ballot in parliament, meaning more
than 60 of Parks own conservative Saenuri Party members backed removing her. The votes of least 200 members of the
300-seat chamber were needed for the motion to pass.
The Constitutional Court must now decide whether to uphold the motion, a process that could take up to 180 days.

Related: South Korean parliament votes overwhelmingly to impeach President Park

Russia and Japan are also inching closer to a settlement of the Kuril Islands dispute.

Andrei Fesyun, an expert at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow, said that setting up joint ventures on the islands
was a highly complicated issue.

There was an idea to build a spa hotel there and other things but there are more to this than just economic gain
for business. For the Japanese the Kuril Islands are a very sensitive issue and what Prime Minister [Shinzo] Abe is
now doing is nothing short of a heroic feat.

He is the first Japanese Premier to openly say that he wants to have better relations with Russia. I can imagine
how much resistance he has to deal with, thats why I dont think we should expect any quick breakthroughs here.
One thing is clear: we are now ready to meet and talk things over, he said.

Fumio Kishida arrived in Moscow on December 3 for a two-day visit ahead of President Vladimir Putins planned official
trip to Japan later this month.
Lavrov said that Kishidas meeting with President Putin on Friday showed directions in which Japanese-Russian relations
should progress.

Meanwhile, Japans Foreign Ministry has expressed hope that President Vladimir Putins visit to Japan on December 15-16
would further strengthen relations between the two countries. According to the statement, Putin will meet with Japanese
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in Nagato and in Tokyo.

Related: Against All Odds: Russia, Japan Inching Towards a Deal on Disputed Kuril Islands

The fall of the South Korean puppet government, and Japans peaceful re-engagement with Russia, will make it impossible
for the installation of the US THAAD missile system, in both countries.

We are hoping that all of these positive developments should not make way for any desperate attempt at pushing the red
button, as predicted by multiple sources.

Putins Compelling Exposure Of The Egregious Lawless Behaviour Of The Western


Dark Cabal In The Wake Of The True Revolution Of The Masses
November 5 2016 | From: StankovUniversalLaw / Kremlin / Various

Speech at the Valdai International Discussion Club, October 27, 2016.


President of Russia Vladimir Putin:

Related: Vladimir Putins Third Way: As Seen Through the Nooscope

Tarja, Heinz, Thabo, colleagues, ladies and gentlemen,

It is a great pleasure to see you again. I want to start by thanking all of the participants in the Valdai International Discussion
Club, from Russia and abroad, for your constructive part in this work, and I want to thank our distinguished guests for their
readiness to take part in this open discussion.

Our esteemed moderator just wished me a good departure into retirement, and I wish myself the same when the time
comes. This is the right approach and the thing to do. But I am not retired yet and am for now the leader of this big country.
As such, it is fitting to show restraint and avoid displays of excessive aggressiveness. I do not think that this is my style
in any case.

But I do think that we should be frank with each other, particularly here in this gathering. I think we should hold candid, open
discussions, otherwise our dialogue makes no sense and would be insipid and without the slightest interest.

I think that this style of discussion is extremely needed today given the great changes taking place in the world. The theme
for our meeting this year, The Future in Progress: Shaping the World of Tomorrow, is very topical.
Related: Can The American People Defeat The Oligarchy That Rules Them?

Last year, the Valdai forum participants discussed the problems with the current world order. Unfortunately, little has
changed for the better over these last months. Indeed, it would be more honest to say that nothing has changed.

The tensions engendered by shifts in distribution of economic and political influence continue to grow. Mutual distrust
creates a burden that narrows our possibilities for finding effective responses to the real threats and challenges facing
the world today.

Essentially, the entire globalisation project is in crisis today and in Europe, as we know well, we hear voices now saying that
multiculturalism has failed.

I think this situation is in many respects the result of mistaken, hasty and to some extent over-confident choices made
by some countries elites a quarter-of-a-century ago. Back then, in the late 1980s-early 1990s, there was a chance not just
to accelerate the globalisation process but also to give it a different quality and make it more harmonious and sustainable
in nature.

But some countries that saw themselves as victors in the Cold War, not just saw themselves this way but said it
openly, took the course of simply reshaping the global political and economic order to fit their own interests.

In their euphoria, they essentially abandoned substantive and equal dialogue with other actors in international life, chose
not to improve or create universal institutions, and attempted instead to bring the entire world under the spread
of their own organisations, norms and rules.
They chose the road of globalisation and security for their own beloved selves, for the select few, and not for all. But far from
everyone was ready to agree with this.

We may as well be frank here, as we know full well that many did not agree with what was happening, but some were
unable by then to respond, and others were not yet ready to respond.

The result though is that the system of international relations is in a feverish state and the global economy cannot extricate
itself from systemic crisis. At the same time, rules and principles, in the economy and in politics, are constantly being
distorted and we often see what only yesterday was taken as a truth and raised to dogma status reversed completely.

If the powers that be today find some standard or norm to their advantage, they force everyone else to comply.

But if tomorrow these same standards get in their way, they are swift to throw them in the bin, declare them
obsolete, and set or try to set new rules.
Thus, we saw the decisions to launch airstrikes in the centre of Europe, against Belgrade, and then came Iraq, and then
Libya. The operations in Afghanistan also started without the corresponding decision from the United Nations Security
Council.

In their desire to shift the strategic balance in their favour these countries broke apart the international legal framework that
prohibited deployment of new missile defence systems.

They created and armed terrorist groups, whose cruel actions have sent millions of civilians into flight, made
millions of displaced persons and immigrants, and plunged entire regions into chaos.

We see how free trade is being sacrificed and countries use sanctions as a means of political pressure, bypass the World
Trade Organisation and attempt to establish closed economic alliances with strict rules and barriers, in which the main
beneficiaries are their own transnational corporations.
And we know this is happening. They see that they cannot resolve all of the problems within the WTO framework and so
think, why not throw the rules and the organisation itself aside and build a new one instead. This illustrates what I just said.

At the same time, some of our partners demonstrate no desire to resolve the real international problems in the world today.

In organisations such as NATO, for example, established during the Cold War and clearly out of date today, despite
all the talk about the need to adapt to the new reality, no real adaptation takes place.

We see constant attempts to turn the OSCE, a crucial mechanism for ensuring common European and also trans-Atlantic
security, into an instrument in the service of someones foreign policy interests. The result is that this very important
organisation has been hollowed out.

But they continue to churn out threats, imaginary and mythical threats such as the Russian military threat.
Related: Hillary Clintons Strategic Ambition In A Nutshell. Regime Change in Russia Putin is an Obstacle

This is a profitable business that can be used to pump new money into defence budgets at home, get allies to bend
to a single superpowers interests, expand NATO and bring its infrastructure, military units and arms closer to our borders.

Of course, it can be a pleasing and even profitable task to portray oneself as the defender of civilisation against the new
barbarians. The only thing is that Russia has no intention of attacking anyone.

This is all quite absurd. I also read analytical materials, those written by you here today, and by your colleagues
in the USA and Europe.

It is unthinkable, foolish and completely unrealistic. Europe alone has 300 million people. All of the NATO members
together with the USA have a total population of 600 million, probably.

Putin Warns Americans: You're Being Distracted!


Of all the internal problems the Presidential candidates could solve - Clinton harps on about "Russian aggression"
and mainstream media goes into Russophobic overdrive.

But Russia has only 146 million. It is simply absurd to even conceive such thoughts. And yet they use these ideas in pursuit
of their political aims.

Another mythical and imaginary problem is what I can only call the hysteria the USA has whipped up over supposed
Russian meddling in the American presidential election.

The United States has plenty of genuinely urgent problems, it would seem, from the colossal public debt to the increase
in firearms violence and cases of arbitrary action by the police.
You would think that the election debates would concentrate on these and other unresolved problems, but the elite
has nothing with which to reassure society, it seems, and therefore attempt to distract public attention by pointing
instead to supposed Russian hackers, spies, agents of influence and so forth.

I have to ask myself and ask you too: Does anyone seriously imagine that Russia can somehow influence the American
peoples choice? America is not some kind of banana republic, after all, but is a great power. Do correct me if I am wrong.

Putin expressed hopes that a new US president will work with him to rectify the dangerous deterioration in relations between
the US and Russia. Obviously, this cannot happen if the new president is Hillary.

Related: President Putin Asks US To Stop Provoking Russia

The question is, if things continue in this vein, what awaits the world? What kind of world will we have tomorrow? Do we
have answers to the questions of how to ensure stability, security and sustainable economic growth? Do we know how we
will make a more prosperous world?

Sad as it is to say, there is no consensus on these issues in the world today. Maybe you have come to some common
conclusions through your discussions, and I would, of course, be interested to hear them.

But it is very clear that there is a lack of strategy and ideas for the future. This creates a climate of uncertainty that has
a direct impact on the public mood.

Sociological studies conducted around the world show that people in different countries and on different continents tend
to see the future as murky and bleak. This is sad. The future does not entice them, but frightens them. At the same time,
people see no real opportunities or means for changing anything, influencing events and shaping policy.

Yes, formally speaking, modern countries have all the attributes of democracy: Elections, freedom of speech, access
to information, freedom of expression. But even in the most advanced democracies the majority of citizens have no
real influence on the political process and no direct and real influence on power.
People sense an ever-growing gap between their interests and the elites vision of the only correct course, a course
the elite itself chooses.

The result is that referendums and elections increasingly often create surprises for the authorities.

People do not at all vote as the official and respectable media outlets advised them to, nor as the mainstream parties
advised them to. Public movements that only recently were too far left or too far right are taking centre stage and pushing
the political heavyweights aside.

At first, these inconvenient results were hastily declared anomaly or chance. But when they became more frequent, people
started saying that society does not understand those at the summit of power and has not yet matured sufficiently to be able
to assess the authorities labour for the public good.

Or they sink into hysteria and declare it the result of foreign, usually Russian, propaganda.

Friends and colleagues, I would like to have such a propaganda machine here in Russia, but regrettably, this is not
the case. We have not even global mass media outlets of the likes of CNN, BBC and others. We simply do not have this
kind of capability yet.
As for the claim that the fringe and populists have defeated the sensible, sober and responsible minority - we are
not talking about populists or anything like that but about ordinary people, ordinary citizens who are losing trust
in the ruling class. That is the problem.

By the way, with the political agenda already eviscerated as it is, and with elections ceasing to be an instrument for change
but consisting instead of nothing but scandals and digging up dirt who gave someone a pinch, who sleeps with whom, if
youll excuse me.

This just goes beyond all boundaries. And honestly, a look at various candidates platforms gives the impression that they
were made from the same mould the difference is slight, if there is any.

It seems as if the elites do not see the deepening stratification in society and the erosion of the middle class, while
at the same time, they implant ideological ideas that, in my opinion, are destructive to cultural and national identity.

And in certain cases, in some countries they subvert national interests and renounce sovereignty in exchange
for the favour of the suzerain.
This begs the question: who is actually the fringe? The expanding class of the supranational oligarchy
and bureaucracy, which is in fact often not elected and not controlled by society, or the majority of citizens, who
want simple and plain things stability, free development of their countries, prospects for their lives and the lives
of their children, preserving their cultural identity, and, finally, basic security for themselves and their loved ones.

People are clearly scared to see how terrorism is evolving from a distant threat to an everyday one, how a terrorist attack
could occur right near them, on the next street, if not on their own street, while any makeshift item from a home-made
explosive to an ordinary truck can be used to carry out a mass killing.

Moreover, the terrorist attacks that have taken place in the past few years in Boston and other US cities, Paris, Brussels,
Nice and German cities, as well as, sadly, in our own country, show that terrorists do not need units or organised
structures they can act independently, on their own, they just need the ideological motivation against their enemies, that is,
against you and us.
The terrorist threat is a clear example of how people fail to adequately evaluate the nature and causes of the growing
threats. We see this in the way events in Syria are developing. No one has succeeded in stopping the bloodshed
and launching a political settlement process.

One would think that we would have begun to put together a common front against terrorism now, after such
lengthy negotiations, enormous effort and difficult compromises.

But this has not happened and this common front has not emerged. My personal agreements with the President
of the United States have not produced results either.

There were people in Washington ready to do everything possible to prevent these agreements from being
implemented in practice.

This all demonstrates an unexplainable and I would say irrational desire on the part of the Western countries to keep making
the same mistakes or, as we say here in Russia, keep stepping on the same rake.

We all see what is happening in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and a number of other countries. I have to ask, where are
the results of the fight against terrorism and extremism? Overall, looking at the world as a whole, there are some results
in particular regions and locations, but there is no global result and the terrorist threat continues to grow.

We all remember the euphoria in some capitals over the Arab Spring. Where are these fanfares today?

Russias calls for a joint fight against terrorism go ignored. Whats more, they continue to arm, supply and train
terrorist groups in the hope of using them to achieve their own political aims.
Related: Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros radical vision of open-border world

This is a very dangerous game and I address the players once again: The extremists in this case are more cunning, clever
and stronger than you, and if you play these games with them, you will always lose.

Colleagues, it is clear that the international community should concentrate on the real problems facing humanity today,
the resolution of which will make our world a safer and more stable place and make the system of international relations
fairer and more equal.

As I said, it is essential to transform globalisation from something for a select few into something for all. It is my firm belief
that we can overcome these threats and challenges only by working together on the solid foundation of international law
and the United Nations Charter.

Today it is the United Nations that continues to remain an agency that is unparalleled in representativeness and universality,
a unique venue for equitable dialogue. Its universal rules are necessary for including as many countries as possible
in economic and humanitarian integration, guaranteeing their political responsibility and working to coordinate their actions
while also preserving their sovereignty and development models.

The NSA leaked the DNC emails because they hate Hillary - Judge Napolitano

Related: Assange: WikiLeaks did not receive Clinton emails from Russian govt

We have no doubt that sovereignty is the central notion of the entire system of international relations. Respect for it and its
consolidation will help underwrite peace and stability both at the national and international levels.

There are many countries that can rely on a history stretching back a thousand years, like Russia, and we have come
to appreciate our identity, freedom and independence.

But we do not seek global domination, expansion or confrontation with anyone.

In our mind, real leadership lies in seeing real problems rather than attempting to invent mythical threats and use
them to steamroll others.

This is exactly how Russia understands its role in global affairs today.

There are priorities without which a prosperous future for our shared planet is unthinkable and they are absolutely obvious.
I wont be saying anything new here.

First of all, there is equal and indivisible security for all states. Only after ending armed conflicts and ensuring the peaceful
development of all countries will we be able to talk about economic progress and the resolution of social, humanitarian
and other key problems.

It is important to fight terrorism and extremism in actuality. It has been said more than once that this evil can only be
overcome by a concerted effort of all states of the world. Russia continues to offer this to all interested partners.

It is necessary to add to the international agenda the issue of restoring the Middle Eastern countries lasting statehood,
economy and social sphere.

The mammoth scale of destruction demands drawing up a long-term comprehensive programme, a kind of Marshall Plan,
to revive the war- and conflict-ridden area. Russia is certainly willing to join actively in these team efforts.

We cannot achieve global stability unless we guarantee global economic progress. It is essential to provide
conditions for creative labour and economic growth at a pace that would put an end to the division of the world into
permanent winners and permanent losers.
The rules of the game should give the developing economies at least a chance to catch up with those we know
as developed economies.

We should work to level out the pace of economic development, and brace up backward countries and regions so
as to make the fruit of economic growth and technological progress accessible to all.

Particularly, this would help to put an end to poverty, one of the worst contemporary problems.

It is also absolutely evident that economic cooperation should be mutually lucrative and rest on universal principles
to enable every country to become an equal partner in global economic activities.

True, the regionalising trend in the world economy is likely to persist in the medium term. However, regional trade
agreements should complement and expand not replace the universal norms and regulations.

Russia advocates the harmonisation of regional economic formats based on the principles of transparency and respect
for each others interests. That is how we arrange the work of the Eurasian Economic Union and conduct negotiations with
our partners, particularly on coordination with the Silk Road Economic Belt project, which China is implementing.
We expect it to promote an extensive Eurasian partnership, which promises to evolve into one of the formative centres
of a vast Eurasian integration area. To implement this idea, 5+1 talks have begun already for an agreement on trade
and economic cooperation between all participants in the process.

An important task of ours is to develop human potential. Only a world with ample opportunities for all, with highly skilled
workers, access to knowledge and a great variety of ways to realise their potential can be considered truly free.

Only a world where people from different countries do not struggle to survive but lead full lives can be stable.

A decent future is impossible without environment protection and addressing climate problems. That is why the conservation
of the natural world and its diversity and reducing the human impact on the environment will be a priority for the coming
decades.
Another priority is global healthcare. Of course, there are many problems, such as large-scale epidemics, decreasing
the mortality rate in some regions and the like. So there is enormous room for advancement.

All people in the world, not only the elite, should have the right to healthy, long and full lives.

This is a noble goal. In short, we should build the foundation for the future world today by investing in all priority areas
of human development.

And of course, it is necessary to continue a broad-based discussion of our common future so that all sensible
and promising initiatives are heard.

Colleagues, ladies and gentlemen, I am confident that you, as members of the Valdai Club, will actively take part in this
work.
Your expertise enables you to understand all angles of the processes underway both in Russia and in the world, forecast
and evaluate long-term trends, and put forward new initiatives and recommendations that will help us find the way
to the more prosperous and sustainable future that we all badly need.

Thank you very much for your attention.

Video Version of Full Speech:

Addendum:

Media comments on Putins Valdai Speech:

Putin takes part in Valdai clubs final session (LIVE UPDATES) - RT

Vladimir Putin Addresses 13th Annual Valdai Discussion Club (VIDEO) - Sputnik

Putin says Russia showing restraint in Syria but patience may run out - Reuters

Putin says Russia has no option but to clear Aleppo of militants - Reuters

Putin urges new Marshall Plan for Middle East to see recovery and growth - TASS

Putin says Russia does not plan to get militarily involved in Iraq, Libya - Reuters

Russia threat exaggerated by West to justify military spending Putin - SKY News

Putin: Russia is not going to attack anyone - TASS

Putin is sure Russia and Ukraine will find way to end crisis - TASS

Russias Putin says cyber attacks are unacceptable - Reuters

Putin urges US not to provoke Russia to actively protect national interests - TASS
Calling Trump Moscows favorite is nonsense created by media - Putin - RT

Putin says U.S. hysteria over Russia is election ploy - Reuters

Putin rejects claims of Russian interference in US election - AP

Russias Putin says Trump behaves extravagantly to get message across - Reuters

Russias Putin says Obama administration does not stick to any deals - Reuters

Clintons Leaked Emails Confirm Libya Plunder By Killing Gaddafi + Libya: From
Africas Richest State Under Gaddafi, To Failed State After NATO Intervention
October 29 2016 | From: Geopolitics / Various

It was broad daylight robbery and murder when US , France, and the rest of NATO, hunted down
Muammar Qaddafi, and destroyed the most prosperous nation in Africa, i.e. Libya., in 2011.

The above picture is taken during the G8 Summit Italy, in 2009. Libya used to be one of few countries with
sovereign central banks.

Muammar Qaddafi, President of the African Union at that time, was planning to issue gold denominated African dinar to
replace Francs in Francophone Africa, to help his African brothers from centuries of economic plunder.

But thats not all.

The West just hated Muammar Qaddafis internal policies which were kept from the rest of the world by Rothschild
controlled mainstream media.

Here are some examples:

There is no electricity bill in Libya; electricity is free for all its citizens.

There is no interest on loans, banks in Libya are state-owned and loans given to all its citizens at zero percent
interest by law.
Having a home considered a human right in Libya.

All newlyweds in Libya receive $60,000 dinar (U.S.$50,000) by the government to buy their first apartment so to
help start up the family.

Education and medical treatments are free in Libya. Before Gaddafi only 25 percent of Libyans were literate.
Today, the figure is 83 percent.

Should Libyans want to take up farming career, they would receive farming land, a farming house, equipments,
seeds and livestock to kickstart their farms are all for free.

If Libyans cannot find the education or medical facilities they need, the government funds them to go abroad, for
it is not only paid for, but they get a U.S.$2,300/month for accommodation and car allowance.

If a Libyan buys a car, the government subsidizes 50 percent of the price.

The price of petrol in Libya is $0.14 per liter.

Libya has no external debt and its reserves amounting to $150 billion are now frozen globally.

If a Libyan is unable to get employment after graduation the state would pay the average salary of the profession,
as if he or she is employed, until employment is found.

A portion of every Libyan oil sale is credited directly to the bank accounts of all Libyan citizens.

A mother who gives birth to a child receive U.S.$5,000.

40 loaves of bread in Libya costs $0.15.

25 percent of Libyans have a university degree.

Gaddafi carried out the worlds largest irrigation project, known as the Great Manmade River project, to make
water readily available throughout the desert country.

These things Qaddafi was doing while the West maintains its exceptionalist mindset of being the epitome of freedom and
democracy throughout the globe. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

These are the faces of the people that would murder him more than a year later.

Now, with the fall of CIA Daesh Islamic State in Syria, Libya is hosting the highest population of ISIS terrorists, and added
itself to a growing number of failed states in the region.
ISIS Massacred Over 300 West African Migrants In Libya

The Khazarian Nazionist agenda in the Middle East, and the methods being used against the Arabs and Africans, are still
the same methods that were used by Western pirates not too long ago in the Pacific, which includes:

Bribery of local overlords to help them loot the country; Saudi Arabia is a perfect example; Leaders in Latin
America were also subjected to the same attacks by economic hitmen;

Removal of uncooperative leaders through color revolutions;

Total destruction of the State through divide and conquer by pitting clans and warlords against each other;

For the last 400 years, another resource rich country like the Philippines fall victim to all three methods.

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) has a hit list of Arab nations to conquer obviously with little regard for
Arab casualties. Such hit list includes a total of seven countries beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran,
Somalia, and Sudan.

Related: Its A US-led Invasion, Not Civil War in Syria | US Peace Council

The leaked Clinton email confirms that what they did and continue to do in Libya is the fulfillment of this hit list:

France's Client and Gaddafis Gold:

From: Sidney Blumenthal


To: Hillary Clinton
Date: 2011-04-01 21:00

Subject: FRANCES CLIENT & QADDAFIS GOLD

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05785522 Date: 01/07/2016
RELEASE IN FULL CONFIDENTIAL April 2, 2011

For: Hillary
From: Sid
Re: Frances client & Qaddafis gold

A high ranking official on the National Libyan Council states that factions have developed within it. In part this
reflects the cultivation by France in particular of clients among the rebels. General Abdelfateh Younis is the leading
figure closest to the French, who are believed to have made payments of an unknown amount to him. Younis has
told others on the NLC that the French have promised they will provide military trainers and arms.

So far the men and materiel have not made an appearance. Instead, a few risk assessment analysts wielding
clipboards have come and gone. Jabril, Jalil and others are impatient. It is understood that France has clear
economic interests at stake. Sarkozys occasional emissary, the intellectual self-promoter Bernard Henri-Levy, is
considered by those in the NLC who have dealt with him as a semi-useful, semi joke figure.

Rumors swept the NLC upper echelon this week that Qaddafi may be dead or maybe not.

Qaddafi has nearly bottomless financial resources to continue indefinitely, according to the latest report we
have received:

On April 2, 2011 sources with access to advisors to Saif al-Islam Qaddafi stated in strictest confidence that while
the freezing of Libyas foreign bank accounts presents Muammar Qaddafi with serious challenges, his ability to
equip and maintain his armed forces and intelligence services remains intact.

According to sensitive information available to this these individuals, Qaddafis government holds 143 tons of
gold, and a similar amount in silver.

During late March, 2011 these stocks were moved to SABHA (south west in the direction of the Libyan border
with Niger and Chad); taken from the vaults of the Libyan Central Bank in Tripoli. This gold was accumulated prior
to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan
golden Dinar.

This plan was designed to provide , the Francophone African Countries with an alternative to the French
franc (CFA). (Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued
at more than $7 billion.

French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the
factors that influenced President Nicolas

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05785522

Date: 01/07/2016

Sarkozys decision to commit France to the attack on Libya. According to these individuals Sarkozys plans are
driven by the following issues:

a. A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production,

b. Increase French influence in North Africa,

c. Improve his internal political situation in France,

d. Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the world, address the concern of his
advisors over Qaddafis long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in, Francophone Africa. )

On the afternoon of April 1, an individual with access to the National Libyan Council (NLC) stated in private that
senior officials of the NLC believe that the rebel military forces are beginning to show signs of improved discipline
and fighting spirit under some of the new military commanders, including Colonel Khalifha Haftar, the former
commander of the anti - Qaddafi forces in the Libyan National Army (LNA). According to these sources, units
defecting from Qaddafis force are also taking a greater role in the fighting on behalf of the rebels.

- Source

They were monitoring where the gold is heading, and they got what they wanted.

Fortunately for us, they were interrupted in Syria and Iran as the BRICS, and 180 more allied countries, decided to standup
to these few old men and women with kleptocratic and eugenics tendencies.

But it is extremely important to remind ourselves that the United Nations and mainstream media were complicit to all of
these high crimes committed against the sovereign people of Libya, and other countries.

We cannot afford to lower our guards however the covert NWO geopolitical game is played.

Libya: From Africas Richest State Under Gaddafi, To Failed State After NATO
Intervention

It has been five years since the Western-backed assassination of Libyas former president,
Muammar Gaddafi, and the fall of one of Africas greatest nations.

In 1967 Colonel Gaddafi inherited one of the poorest nations in Africa; however, by the time he was assassinated,
Gaddafi had turned Libya into Africas wealthiest nation. Libya had the highest GDP per capita and life expectancy
on the continent. Less people lived below the poverty line than in the Netherlands.
Related: Hillarys War Crime: The Murder of Muammar Gaddafi. We Came, we Saw, he Died.

After NATOs intervention in 2011, Libya is now a failed state and its economy is in shambles. As the governments control
slips through their fingers and into to the militia fighters hands, oil production has all but stopped.

The militias variously local, tribal, regional, Islamist or criminal, that have plagued Libya since NATOs intervention, have
recently lined up into two warring factions. Libya now has two governments, both with their own Prime Minister, parliament
and army.

On one side, in the West of the country, Islamist-allied militias took over control of the capital Tripoli and other cities and set
up their own government, chasing away a parliament that was elected over the summer.

Tripoli

On the other side, in the East of the Country, the legitimate government dominated by anti-Islamist politicians, exiled 1,200
kilometers away in Tobruk, no longer governs anything.

The fall of Gaddafis administration has created all of the countrys worst-case scenarios: Western embassies have all left,
the South of the country has become a haven for terrorists, and the Northern coast a center of migrant trafficking. Egypt,
Algeria and Tunisia have all closed their borders with Libya.

This all occurs amidst a backdrop of widespread rape, assassinations and torture that complete the picture of a state that is
failed to the bone.

America is clearly fed up with the two inept governments in Libya and is now backing a third force: long-time CIA
asset, General Khalifa Hifter, who aims to set himself up as Libyas new dictator.

Hifter, who broke with Gaddafi in the 1980s and lived for years in Langley, Virginia, close to the CIAs headquarters, where
he was trained by the CIA, has taken part in numerous American regime change efforts, including the aborted attempt to
overthrow Gaddafi in 1996.
In 1991 the New York Times reported that Hifter may have been one of 600 Libyan soldiers trained by American
intelligence officials in sabotage and other guerrilla skillsto fit in neatly into the Reagan Administrations eagerness to
topple Colonel Qaddafi.

Hifters forces are currently vying with the Al Qaeda group Ansar al-Sharia for control of Libyas second largest city,
Benghazi.

Ansar al-Sharia was armed by America during the NATO campaign against Colonel Gaddafi. In yet another example of the
U.S. backing terrorists backfiring, Ansar al-Sharia has recently been blamed by America for the brutal assassination of U.S.
Ambassador Stevens.
Hifter is currently receiving logistical and air support from the U.S. because his faction envision a mostly secular Libya open
to Western financiers, speculators, and capital.

Perhaps, Gaddafis greatest crime, in the eyes of NATO, was his desire to put the interests of local labour above foreign
capital and his quest for a strong and truly United States of Africa.

In fact, in August 2011, President Obama confiscated $30 billion from Libyas Central Bank, which Gaddafi had
earmarked for the establishment of the African IMF and African Central Bank.

In 2011, the Wests objective was clearly not to help the Libyan people, who already had the highest standard of living in
Africa, but to oust Gaddafi, install a puppet regime, and gain control of Libyas natural resources.
He may not have been a Saint, but for over 40 years, Gaddafi promoted economic democracy and used the
nationalized oil wealth to sustain progressive social welfare programs for all Libyans. Under Gaddafis rule,
Libyans enjoyed not only free health-care and free education, but also free electricity and interest-free loans.

Now thanks to NATOs intervention the health-care sector is on the verge of collapse as thousands of Filipino health workers
flee the country, institutions of higher education across the East of the country are shut down, and black outs are a common
occurrence in once thriving Tripoli.

One group that has suffered immensely from NATOs bombing campaign is the nations women. Unlike many other
Arab nations, women in Gaddafis Libya had the right to education, hold jobs, divorce, hold property and have an
income. The United Nations Human Rights Council praised Gaddafi for his promotion of womens rights.

When the colonel seized power in 1969, few women went to university. Today, more than half of Libyas university students
are women. One of the first laws Gaddafi passed in 1970 was an equal pay for equal work law.

Nowadays, the new democratic Libyan regime is clamping down on womens rights. The new ruling tribes are tied to
traditions that are strongly patriarchal.

Also, the chaotic nature of post-intervention Libyan politics has allowed free reign to extremist Islamic forces that see gender
equality as a Western perversion.
Five years ago, NATO declared that the mission in Libya had been one of the most successful in NATO history.

Truth is, Western interventions have produced nothing but colossal failures in Libya, Iraq, and Syria.

Lest we forget, prior to western military involvement in these three nations, they were the most modern and secular states in
the Middle East and North Africa with the highest regional womens rights and standards of living.

A decade of failed military expeditions in the Middle East has left the American people in trillions of dollars of debt. However,
one group has benefited immensely from the costly and deadly wars: Americas Military-Industrial-Complex.

Building new military bases means billions of dollars for Americas military elite. As Will Blum has pointed out, following the
bombing of Iraq, the United States built new bases in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Saudi
Arabia.

Where in the World is the US Military?


Following the bombing of Afghanistan, the United States is now building military bases in Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan
and Tajikistan.

Following the recent bombing of Libya, the United States has built new military bases in the Seychelles, Kenya, South
Sudan, Niger and Burkina Faso.

Given that Libya sits atop the strategic intersection of the African, Middle Eastern and European worlds, Western control of
the nation, has always been a remarkably effective way to project power into these three regions and beyond.

NATOs military intervention may have been a resounding success for Americas military elite and oil companies but for the
ordinary Libyan, the military campaign may indeed go down in history as one of the greatest failures of the 21st century.

False Flag Attacks, Fake Terrorism & Engineered Wars

Part 1: Click here

Part 2: Click here

Part 3: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/false-flag-engineered-wars.shtml
False Flag Attacks, Fake Terrorism & Engineered Wars

Part 1: Click here

Part 2: Click here

Part 3: Click here

Syria Story Is A Fools Paradise


October 26 2016 | From: PeterDrew

George W Bush was infamous for the many comically calamitous lines he delivered during his
presidency. But one quote he delivered, albeit very poorly, was in fact a very poignant line and one
that could not be more applicable right now in Syria: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice,
shame on me.
What about fool me thrice? How can the architects of the current holocaust in Syria possibly think that they can
fool the public with the same card trick three times in a row?

Related: I Am A Syrian Living In Syria: It Was Never A Revolution Nor A Civil War: The Terrorists Are Sent By Your
Government

Manufactured regime change in Iraq, then in Libya, and now in the sixth year of desperately attempting the same
thing in Syria.

On each occasion, the leader of those nations has been portrayed by the West as tyrants who are slaughtering their own
people and who must be overthrown, either directly or indirectly for the good of democracy in the world, no matter how many
innocent people get killed in achieving that noble goal.

Under the Geneva Convention it is an international war crime to launch military action against another nation for the
purposes of regime change. Under the Geneva Convention, Iraq and Libya are clear war crimes and have been legally
declared as such through numerous legitimate legal channels.

The Geneva Convention

If the Nuremburg trials were being held tomorrow, both George W Bush and Barrack Obama would be as guilty as all the
others war criminals on trial at Nuremburg. Both Iraq and Libya have been totally destroyed as nations, and illegal regime
change achieved by the West. Likewise Syria is all about Western driven regime change.

Anyone who doubts that Iraq, Libya, and Syria have not been meticulously targeted by Western political and military powers
for systematic regime change need look no further than two very publicly available pieces of information. Firstly, the report
published in September 2000 by PNAC (Project for a New American Century).
PNAC was a Washington think tank headed up by leading Neo-Conservatives, many of whom would take up leading
positions in the Bush Administration the following year. Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld are two of the more recognised
names.

The purpose of PNAC was to look at how the United States could most strongly position itself in the world in the 21st
century.

The 2000 PNAC report clearly outlined the need for a very different power structure across the Middle East, new
government regimes who would be more compliant to US interests, and for the United States to have a much stronger
influence and military presence there, including military bases.

Related: What Washington Really Wants in Syria

However, it also clearly stated that the public would not easily support aggressive military action in the Middle East aimed at
regime change, which could make it very difficult to take the public with them.
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent
some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor...

The events of 9/11 exactly one year later gave the PNAC Neoconservatives that catastrophic and catalysing event
and the opportunity they were seeking. The second important piece of information regarding what is really happening
with the Middle East holocaust occurred shortly after 9/11.

In December 2001, 4-Star General Wesley Clarke made a visit to the Pentagon during which he was informed that there
was a plan for the United States to invade Iraq, even though they knew there was nothing at all tying Iraq to 9/11.

He was also told that this was part of an overall plan of invading and bringing down the governments of seven
Middle East countries in five years.

Related: British Parliament Confirms Libya War Was Based On Lies - Turned Nation Into a Shit Show - Spread
Terrorism

Those 7 countries being Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Somalia, and Iran.

In 2007 General Clarke went public about this and his speech can be seen here.

"Weve got a good military and we can take down governments Are we still going to war with Iraq?

"He said, its worse than that... this is a memo that describes how were going to take down seven countries in five
years starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off with Iran

So, just like Iraq and Libya, regime change by Western powers has always been the plan for Syria.

Everything in Syria has been manufactured by the West in just the same way as the sexed up dossiers about
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Just the same as the manufactured public uprising and rebellion was orchestrated in Libya to provide public legitimisation
for bombing Libya back to the stone ages allowing the assassination of its President and the overthrow of the government.
The chemical weapons attacks in Syria in 2013 were put forward by the West in exactly the same way as the
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Supposed conclusive proof that legitimised Western military intervention on humanitarian grounds.

The West demonised Assad for these grotesque attacks on his own people even though there were strong
indications and strong evidence that the chemical weapons attacks were in fact conducted by the rebel terrorist
groups and not the Syrian government.

No condemnation by the West of the possible role that the rebel forces could have played in these terrible crimes against
the innocent Syrian public.

Just blanket condemnation of President Assad and the Syrian government.

As with the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, no thought given to any other possible scenario, no matter how uncertain
the evidence was to support their position.

Just a continuation of the story that all the violence in Syria was being generated by the Syrian government against their
own people.

On the back of these supposed chemical attacks by the Syrian government, President Obama demanded that they now be
allowed to bomb Syria into oblivion as he had done in Libya two years earlier, and how his predecessor had done in Iraq.

British parliament however put paid to Obamas war cry on this occasion.
It was too much for the British public who were deeply scarred and feeling bitterly betrayed by Tony Blairs lies and
illegal destruction of Iraq.

With carpet bombing of the Syrian people by the West now off the table, a quick revising of plans was required to keep
Syrian regime change on the table. The narrative at the time from the West was of a mixture of the supposedly legitimate
Syrian peoples rebellion mixed in with other more radical groups.

However, within just a few months of the decision by British parliament to block the bombing option in Syria, the more
radical groups in Syria suddenly morphed into something which was reported by the West as being much more extreme and
was suddenly branded as ISIS.
Related: The Real Humanitarian Crisis Is Not Aleppo. The Crisis is Washington Losing its ISIS Mercenaries

A seemingly huge, global network of pure evil which had sprung up out of nowhere and was now a great threat to the whole
world. Since then it is ISIS that has provided the narrative for a massive escalation in the level of Western arming, funding,
and training of groups in Syria who are fighting the Assad regime.

These same rebel groups are now well known to be extreme radical terrorist groups affiliated to Al Qaeda such as Al
Nusra, and many of them coming from other countries such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
Not an internal uprising of the Syrian people for their freedom over tyranny as the Western powers keep telling the
world.

The West has literally been in military partnership with Al Qaeda and ISIS.

It is illegal regime change in Syria by the West through stealth.

Western powers supporting and facilitating radical extremist terrorist groups to do what the civilised world deems illegal and
immoral if done through more direct and more obvious means such as carpet bombing.
The PNAC report and General Clarkes testimony have made it very clear what the agenda is in the Middle East.

The official line for the public is that terrible things are going on in those countries, and for the good of the world and to
help spread democracy and freedom, the West must either bomb them to rubble and dust, or support the freedom fighters
to do it for them.

We know that Saddam Hussein, while clearly no saint, did not have any weapons of mass destruction and was not
a threat to the world.

Now more than one million innocent people are dead and a nation of 25 million people destroyed.

When the West started its massive bombing campaign of Libya in 2011 to help overthrow President Gaddafi and his
government, did they inform the public that Libya was actually the most advanced nation in Africa, was in the top 50
most advanced nations in the world, that it had free health care and free education, and that Nelson Mandela had
described President Gaddafi as the hero of Africa?
Above is an image from Libya. The other similar-looking images in this article are from Syria. Is it not interesting that wherever the Cabal-run US and
their Allies deploy 'democracy' - that these places always wind up looking very much the same...

Libya is now a basket case of a country run by brutal terrorist extremists.

Now in Syria we have the Assad government, who were legitimately and democratically re-elected to power in 2012 with
huge public support, being systematically demonised by the West in exactly the same way as President Gaddafi in Libya.

It would seem that all President Assad and the Syrian Army have been doing is defending themselves and the Syrian people
against radical extremist terrorists commonly referred to as ISIS and Al Qaeda, who have been proven to be recruited from
other countries and actively supported by Western military and intelligence.

Syria is under a massive multi-national external attack, not an internal civil war.
Related: The Boy In The Ambulance: US State Dept-Funded Groups Behind Latest 'Iconic Image' Designed To
Demonize Russia And Encourage Further Bloodshed In Syria

At the specific request of President Assad, Russia has joined with the Syrian Army to support them in that fight against ISIS
and their brutal attacks on the Syrian people.

As Russias current military intervention in Syria is at the official request of the Syrian government, it is legal under
international law.

All other current military action by other nations in Syria, including the United States, is illegal under international
law.

US Secretary of State John Kerry even admitted this himself recently when he was caught on microphone off air.
Related: Western Media Credibility In Free Fall Collapse: Case In Point: UN Peace Council: The US Media Is Lying
To The American people. The War In Syria Is Not A Civil War, It's A Proxy Invasion By The United States

"We dont have a basis (to intervene), our lawyers tell us, unless we have a UN Security Council Resolution which
the Russians can veto or unless we are under attack from folks or unless we are invited in.

Russia is invited in by the legitimate regime," said Kerry acknowledging the Assad governments stature under the
doctrines of international law.

- US Secretary of State John Kerry

Yet incredibly, despite this, Russia has now also been universally demonised by the West in a vicious propaganda smear
campaign and blamed for war crimes in Syria simply for supporting Syria defend itself against ISIS as requested by the
Syrian government.

When the world looks at the daily news of what is allegedly happening in Syria there is another important recent disclosure
that needs to be considered.

It has now been officially admitted that the Pentagon has more than a half billion dollar budget which it has been
using to engage the services of British PR company Bell Pottinger in the Middle East.
Aww, chemtrails

Bell Pottingers function is seemingly to create manufactured images and footage in the Middle East that supports
a specific political narrative.

Presumably this would be the narrative that the United States government wishes to portray to the world.

It would seem that the Pentagon is paying for fake news images and footage to be created and shown to the world for
political purposes.

The Pentagon is paying big money for Hollywood style theatre to be created and portrayed to the world as real
news.

The Bell Pottinger theatre news seems to go very much hand in hand with the incredible piece of legislation that President
Obama signed off in 2012.
The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act (H.R. 5736) overturned the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 which banned government
propaganda.

The passing of HR 5736 essentially made it legal for the United States government to broadcast fake news or deliberate
propaganda through the media for political purposes, and they have allocated a huge budget to the Pentagon to do just
that. We have entered a very different world here.

President Assad's Wife Tells it Like it Is

Source Article: Asma al-Assad gives first interview in 7 years

What is real news and what is manufactured theatre? When we see small Syrian children being pulled from the rubble from
the supposed attacks by the Syrian government, is this real or is it PR theatre to push the agenda set out by PNAC in
2000?

The systematic and illegal regime change that is being orchestrated across the Middle East as part of PNAC has
created a holocaust the likes of which hasnt been seen since World War 2.

The devastating humanitarian cost of this is bad enough. But the current situation has the potential to escalate into
something far greater and far more destructive on a global scale.
Related: Covert Hybrid WW3 Summary October 2016

The world is on a knife edge at the moment with tensions between the United States and Russia at an all-time critical level,
and with nuclear options not off the table.

Russia has drawn a line in the sand in Syria with regards the United States Project for a New American Century
because they know that the next step after Syria and Iran will be Russia.

So, with this in mind we would be wise to heed those wise words of George W Bush;

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

The world cannot afford to fall for this card trick a third time in Syria.

The stakes are far too high.

Related Articles:

Pentagon Commandos Fighting vs. CIA Daesh Terrorists in Syria

Debunking the Western Medias Coverage of the War on Syria

Six points regarding the US' attempt to destroy Syria

CIA Drug Wars Could Explain Why Syrian Rebels, ISIS Violence Fuelled by Captagon Pills
Hackers Cripple US Internet In Wide-Scale Cyber Attack: Possible Internet "Killswitch"
Test For Staged Cyberwar Or US Election False Flag Event
October 24 2016 | From: Aljazeera / Various

WikiLeaks implied its supporters may be behind the attack and asked them to "stop taking down
the US internet".

Several of the world's best-known websites were inaccessible across parts of the United States on Friday after
hackers unleashed a series of attacks on a company that acts as a switchboard for the internet.

Related: Massive Cyber Attack a Dress-Rehearsal for the US Election?

The attacks affected access to Twitter, Paypal, Spotify and other customers of the infrastructure company in New
Hampshire called Dyn, which processes large volumes of internet traffic.

"The attacks came in waves," Al Jazeera's Rob Reynolds, reporting from Los Angeles, said. "First targeting the
East Coast of the United States, spreading then to the other parts of the country and even to Western Europe."

"The websites that were disrupted were some of the top names in the internet: CNN and the New York Times,
AirBnB, Reddit, HBO ... a whole variety of sites were attacked."

"Dyn is kind of a middle man that directs users to different websites and routes traffic from server to server in a
complex way," said Reynolds.

The attackers used hundreds of thousands of internet-connected devices that had previously been infected with a malicious
code that allowed them to cause outages.

October 16 2016:

U.S. To Use Internet Kill Switch By November In Cyberwar With Russia


'The US government is preparing to activate an internet kill switch according to cyber security experts,
and the groundwork has been laid to blame the unprecedented act on Russia.'

October 21 2016:

Someone Attacked Americas Internet

Twitter, Reddit and Spotify were collateral damage in a major online assault

This article discusses the national Standard Operating Procedure 303 that enables the shut-down of all Internet
and cellular devices. It also discusses the new Executive Order on Space Weather events.

We have two separate issues here:

First, the government is terrified of a public that is able to record and share information in real time. This
makes it difficult for the government to continue with its massive campaign of lies. The Facebook censoring of all
statements that connect Hillary Clinton to her many crimes is emblematic of what the government wants to do
across the board - mind control and the end of freedom of speech are part of the Obama-Clinton-Soros-
Zuckerberg agenda.

Second, the government has a legitimate need to be able to shut down all electrical systems when a solar
storm is about to hit, by shutting them down these systems avoid being fried and weather the storm, they can
be turned on again once the storm passes, as if nothing had happened.

The two should not be confused.

The false accusations against the Russians are a US Government PSYOP against the American public, a last
desperate attempt to distract the public from the very real multi-billion dollar charity fraud and influence pedding
crimes of Bill and Chelsea and Hillary Clinton, with Barack Obama, Loretta Lynch, and James Comey fully
complicit in all those crimes.

This type of attack is known as a distributed denial of service attack [DDoS]. They used affected computers to fire requests
at the servers of Dyn simultaneously and essentially overwhelm it.

"The complexity of the attacks is what's making it very challenging for us." Dyn's chief strategy officer, Kyle York,
told Reuters news agency.

Operation of a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attack:


Related: This Is Why Half the Internet Shut Down

York said that at least some of the malicious traffic was coming from connected devices, including webcams and digital
video recorders, that had been infected with control software named Mirai.

Security researchers have previously raised concerns that such connected devices, sometimes referred to as the Internet of
Things, lack proper security.

The Mirai code was dumped on the internet about a month ago, and criminal groups are now charging to employ it in cyber
attacks, said Allison Nixon, director of security research at Flashpoint, which was helping Dyn analyse the attack.

The Department of Homeland Security last week issued a warning about attacks from the Internet of Things, following the
release of the code for Mirai.

'Attacks Continue'

On Friday, Dyn said in a statement that it had resolved one morning attack, which disrupted operations for about two hours,
but disclosed a second a few hours later that was causing further disruptions. By Friday evening, it was fighting a third.

"The company fought back and was able to get things under control again," our correspondent said. "But there
were additional waves of attack. So this seems to be an ongoing situation."
Attacking a large domain name service provider like Dyn can create massive disruptions because such firms are responsible
for forwarding large volumes of internet traffic.

The disruptions come at a time of unprecedented fears about cyber threats in the US, where hackers have breached
political organisations and election agencies.

The US government has formally accused Russia of conducting cyber attacks against US political organisations during the
campaign for the November 8 presidential election, including hacking of Democratic Party emails.

The US Department of Homeland Security and the FBI said they were investigating the attack on Dyn.

"We still don't know who is responsible for this attack," Reynolds said. "But it certainly seems to be an attack that
took coordination and possibly a lot of resources. So this is not some teenaged kid in a basement somewhere
hacking for fun."

"The purpose behind their attack is also very vague since nothing was stolen. It was just disruptive, so
some people are theorising that someone is trying to figure out how to shut down the internet."

WikiLeaks, a whistle blowing organisation that has been publishing hacked emails that allegedly belong to Democratic
presidential nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman John Podesta, implied in a tweet that its supporters may be
behind the attack and asked them to "stop taking down the US internet".
WikiLeaks has recently said that founder Julian Assange's internet access has been cut by an unidentified state actor.

Ecuador's government later admitted that it had partly restricted internet access for Assange, who has lived in the South
American country's UK embassy to avoid extradition to Sweden since mid-2012.

WikiLeaks' decision to publish documents affecting the US election was entirely its own responsibility, and the country did
not want to meddle in election processes or favour any candidate, Ecuador said.

Related: Ecuador Admits They Silenced Assange Because Clinton Leaks Were Interfering With US Election

Expos On Cabal-Driven Worldwide Terrorism Implemented By The United States And


It's Allies
October 15 2016 | From: Sott / GlobalResearch / Various

J. Michael Springmann worked for the State Department in the 1980s, in Saudi Arabia. What he
witnessed and experienced did not make much sense at the time, but what he later learned put it
all in context, and helped to explain the entire course of U.S. foreign policy for the next 30 years.
In short, just as the CIA provided funding and training for radical Mujahideen to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan,
they have been doing the same thing ever since. Prior to 9/11, this legion of foreign fighters was used to destabilize
and destroy Yugoslavia. Afterward, Iraq, Libya, and today Syria.

Related: The US War on Terror Has Cost $5 Trillion and Increased Terrorism by 6,500%

For this entire period of time, al-Qaeda has been a fighting force for America, a fact that has been known for years, but
which is only now going mainstream due to American failures and Russian successes in Syria.

Today, we interview Mr. Springmann about his time at the consulate in Jeddah, and the events that led him to blow the
whistle and expose the reality of the U.S.'s creation and support of terrorism around the globe.

In the second hour of the show, we discussed the latest Trump and Clinton leaks, and how they reveal what everyone
should have already known: politicians are two-faced and corrupt, and fairly unsavory individuals. Brent closed the show
with another Police State Round-up on police un-accountability.

Running Time: 02:04:03 | Download: OGG, MP3

You can visit Mr. Springmann's website here: michaelspringmann.com


His book is Visas for al-Qaeda: CIA Handouts That Rocked the World

America: Addicted To War

Since 1776, US has been at war 93% of the time. Thats 222 out of 239 years!
The U.S. has only been at peace for 21 years total since its birth

Related: US seeks to enforce global dominance by unleashing war on countries who oppose it Assad

Since the United States was founded in 1776, she has been at war during 214 out of her 235 calendar years of
existence. In other words, there were only 21 calendar years in which the U.S. did not wage any wars.

To put this in perspective:

Pick any year since 1776 and there is a bout a 91% chance that America was involved in some war during that
calendar year.

No U.S. president truly qualifies as a peacetime president. Instead, all U.S. presidents can technically be considered war
presidents.

The U.S. has never gone a decade without war.

The Americans Stand on Our Side and Give us Weapons - Jabhat al-Nusra (Al Qaeda) Commander
in Syria

US weapons are being delivered to Al-Nusra Front by governments that Washington supports, a militant
commander has told German media. RT discusses the interview with Jrgen Todenhfer, the journalist who spoke
to the Al-Nusra commander.

Related: Al-Qaeda Leader in Syria Admits US Is Backing Them in Interview

The CIA has been coordinating weapon deliveries on the Turkey-Syria border, German journalist Jurgen Todenhofer, who
recently spoke with a Jabhat al-Nusra commander, told RT. He added that the US knows that the weapons it delivers to
rebels end up with terrorists.

This is a game everybody knows. Its very clear that the Americans know that their weapons will in the
end be in the hands of terrorists, Todenhofer said speaking to RT.
The only time in the U.S. went five years without war (1935-40) was during the isolationist period of the Great Depression.

In most of these wars, the U.S. was on the offense. Admit- tedly some of the wars were defensive. However, the above list
leaves out covert CIA operations and other acts which could be considered war.

Lets update whats happened since 2011:

2012 War on Terror in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Syria and Yemen

2013 War on Terror in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Syria and Yemen

2014 War on Terror in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Syria and Yemen; Civil War in Ukraine 2015 War on Terror in
Somalia, Syria and Yemen; Civil War in Ukraine

Related: The Bush / Cheney / Rumsfeld Strategy for Iraq

Related: How Intelligence Was Falsified To Support Invasion Of Iraq

So we can add four more years of war. That means that for 222 out of 239 years or 93% of the time America has been
at war. (We can quibble with the exact numbers, but the high percentage of time that America has been at war is clear and
unmistakable.)

Indeed, most of the military operations launched since World War II have been launched by the U.S. And Ameri- can military
spending dwarfs the rest of the world put together.
No wonder polls show that the world believes America is the number 1 threat to peace. Sott Comment: Rather staggering,
dont you think? Also, for many of the war years, the US had multiple opponents. After all this war practice, we might rightly
expect a simple bombing raid on ISIS to produce results.

Related: Confession of a CIA Agent: They Gave Us Millions to Dismember Yugoslavia

Americas history reflects violence. Its blood-drenched. It glorifies war. It does so in the name of
peace. However, this agenda is not driven by the American people so much as it is driven from up
on high by the Cabal leadership who manipulate the sleeping masses to buy into actions that only
appear to be "American".

The US / NATO is the tool and the scapegoat of the 'global elite's' New World Order.

America believes war is peace. Its part of the national culture. Eventually its self-destructive. Todays super-weapons make
the unthinkable possible.

Hyman Rickover knew. He knew decades ago. He founded Americas nuclear navy. In 1982, he told Congress:

I do not believe that nuclear power is worth it if it creates radiation. Then you might ask me why do I have nuclear
powered ships?

That is a necessary evil. I would sink them all. I am not proud of the part I played in it. I did it because it was
necessary for the safety of this country.

Thats why I am such a great exponent of stopping this whole nonsense of war. Unfortunately limits attempts to
limit war have always failed.

The lesson of history is when a war starts every nation will ultimately use whatever weapon it has available.
Every time you produce radiation, you produce something that has a certain half-life, in some cases for billions of
years.

I think the human race is going to wreck itself, and it is important that we get control of this horrible force and try to
eliminate it.

In his Der Ring des Nibelungen operas (the Ring), Richard Wagner portrayed his apocalyptic version. He did so musically.
Gotterdammerung (Twilight of the Gods) prophesied the end of the world.

Related: U.S. Admits Israel Is Building Permanent Apartheid Regime - Weeks After Giving It $38 Billion

Einstein feared it. He didnt know what WW III weapons would be used. He said World War IV will be fought with sticks and
stones.

Bertrand Russell was an Einstein contemporary. He knew. He warned. No one listened. He asked:

Shall we put an end to the human race, or shall mankind renounce war. Its the only way to live in peace. The
alternative is annihilation."

The choice is clear. The wrong one assures disaster. Americas heading humanity toward it. A slow-motion train wreck
looms. The big one. Theres no second chance. Theres no coming back.

Historian Harry Elmer Barnes (1889 1968) once said:


If trends continue as they have during the last fifteen years, we shall soon reach this point of no return, and can
only anticipate interminable wars, disguised as noble gestures for peace.

Historian Arnold Toynbee worried about WW III. Only pigmies in remote jungles, apes and ants might be left to carry on the
cultural traditions of mankind, he said.

According to HG Wells:

If we dont end war, war will end us.

Related: Pentagon Paid PR Firm $540mn to Make Fake Terrorist Videos

America wages permanent wars. It does so against enemies it creates. During the Cold War, Active Defense and AirLand
Battle prepared strategies for how America would fight.

Soviet Russia was targeted. Todays its modern day Russia. Its China. AirSea Battle targets both countries. More on that
below.

In 1998, US Space Command: Vision for 2020 discussed Americas grand strategy.

In 2000, DOD Joint Vision 2020 called for full spectrum dominance over all land, surface and sub-surface sea, air, space,
electromagnetic spectrum and information systems.
Related: Top USA National Security Officials Admit Turkey Coup

It did so with enough overwhelming power to fight and win global wars against any adversary. Nuclear and other mass
destruction weapons would be used preemptively.

In 1961, General Curtis LeMay believed nuclear war with Soviet Russia was inevitable. He wanted thousands of missiles
launched preemptively. He called retaliation against major US cities a small price to pay.

At the same time, General Lyman Lemnitzer urged a surprise nuclear attack strategy. Jack Kennedy expressed disgust. He
walked out of a National Security Council meeting. He wanted none of it.

He told Secretary of State Dean Rusk: And we call ourselves the human race.

Secretary of Defense McNamara categorically rejected LeMay and Lemnitzer. He should have fired them on the spot. Other
extremists then and later urged the same lunacy.

Crazies have great influence today. Todays weapons make earlier ones look like toys. Armageddon could happen. Rogue
states cant be trusted. America most of all.
Eisenhower warned;

Against the acquisition of unwarranted influence. He named the military-industrial complex.

The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist, he stressed.

Militarism writ large is the national pastime. Its a national addiction. The business of America is war. Its multiple wars. Its
permanent ones. Its ravaging one nation after another.

Its doing so for wealth, power, resource control, and unchallenged global dominance.

Armed Drones: President Obama's Favorite Weapon

President Barack Obama has received much credit for drawing down American involvement in Iraq and
Afghanistan, but less attention has been paid to his administration's embrace of armed drones.

Related: Armed Drones: President Obama's Favorite Weapon

His expansion of covert drone strikes goes far beyond that of former President George W. Bush, and has blurred the line
between warfare and assassination.

The classified processes used by the White House for approving these remote killings in foreign countries - countries which
the U.S. is not officially at war with - has people questioning not only the Obama administration's tactics, but also the
collateral damage of civilian casualties left in its wake.
Related: Classified U.S. Defense Network Outage Hits Air Forces Secret Drone Operations

Related: Why Elites Love Drones

America never was the land of the free and home of the brave. Its a war on humanity society. Its a let em eat
cake one.

Its an out-of-control rogue state. Its ideologically over-the-top. It spends more on militarism and wars than the rest of the
world combined.

Doing so lets war profiteers gorge themselves at the public trough. Doing so makes peace impossible. Warrior
nations eventually self-destruct. Nations that live by the sword die by it. Americas no exception.

According too Navy Live, Air-Sea Battle (ABS):

Is designed to develop force over the long-term. (It) seeks to provide decision makers with a wide range of options
to counter aggression from hostile actors.

It targets China and Russia. It reflects the US commitment to maintaining escalation advantage during conflict and
sustaining security and prosperity in the global commons.

Its interoperable air and naval forces that can execute networked, integrated attacks-in-depth to disrupt, destroy,
and defeat enemy anti-access area denial capabilities.

Paul Craig Roberts quoted Amitai Etzioni. He asked:

Who Authorized Preparations for War with China?

The Pentagon has concluded that the time has come to prepare for with China, and in a manner well beyond
crafting the sort of contingency plans that are expected for with a wide range of possible confrontations, he said.

"Its a momentous decision. It hasnt received proper attention. Americas posture is largely Pentagon driven.
It stands out even more prominently because (a) the change in military posture may well lead to an arms race with
China, which could culminate in a nuclear war; and (b) the economic condition of the United States requires a
reduction in military spending, not a new arms race.

The start of a new term, and with it the appointment of new secretaries of State and Defense, provides an
opportunity to review the United States China strategy and the militarys role in it.

This review is particularly important before the new preparations for war move from an operational concept to a
militarization program that includes ordering high-cost weapons systems and forced restructuring.

History shows that once these thresholds are crossed, it is exceedingly difficult to change course.

In September 2001, Congress approved the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF). It did so for the use of United
States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.

Carte blanche war-making authority was granted. Americas war on terror began. Its waged on humanity. It does so out of
control. It targets manufactured enemies at home and abroad.

It calls independent nations existential threats. Russia and China are targeted. They represent Americas [The
Cabal New World Order's] final battleground.

Challenging them risks WW III. Obamas no peacemaker. Hes a cold-blooded warrior. They threatens humanitys survival.
His 2010 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) reflects Bush era strategy.

Related: Hillary Clintons Involvement with ISIS Confirmed by Wikileaks

Related: Military Blogger Alleges U.S. Now Aids ISIS to Oust Assad

Its old wine in new bottles. It reserves the right to use nuclear weapons preemptively. Americas only enemies
are ones it invents. Peace is verboten. So is disarmament. Theyre both non-starters.

Washington targets more nations to destroy. It invents reasons for doing so. It threatens humanity in the process.
Preemptive nuclear war assures it. Americas lunatic fringe may launch what cooler heads deplore. Elements in it have
mushroom shaped cloud delusions.
Nuclear war assures turning planet earth into an uninhabited wasteland. Toxic proliferation already is destroying life slowly.

ISIS Was Created by the CIA and Mossad

Related Articles:
Its A US-led Invasion, Not Civil War in Syria | US Peace Council

Hillary Clintons involvement with ISIS confirmed by Wikileaks

President al-Assads interview given to Associated Press

Russia Bombs 30 CIA, Qatari, Mossad Officers in Secret Allepo Bunker

Russia Ready to Confront US Plan B in Syria

Expert: Mainstream Medias Coverage of Syria Serves Power Elite

UN blames US, EU sanctions for punishing Syrian civilians, stalling aid work leaked report

The Syria White Helmets Exposed as US UK Agents Embedded with Al Nusra and ISIS

MSM Syria Lies Need to Be Exposed

How We Know ISIS was 'MADE IN THE USA

Wayne Madsen: Yes, The USA Created ISIS Along With

5 Times the United States Helped ISIS

ISIS was created by the CIA and Mossad

Govt Task Force Confirms US Intelligence Faked Reports to Manipulate Public About ISIS

Extension of the [Engineered] world conflict

The Privatization of War: Mercenaries, Private Military and Security Companies (PMSC)

$40 Billion US In Aid To Israel: For Whom And For What? + Documentary Reveals How
Israel Convinces Americans: Palestine Occupies Israel
October 4 2016 | From: Sott / GlobalResearch / Various

Recently, the United States just renewed military aid to Israel in a decade-long, $38 billion deal -
the largest of its kind in American history.
It represents a significant increase in aid, roughly $3.8 billion a year - expected to be supplemented by additional
assistance through US Congress - up from $3 billion per year previously.

Related: Israel - A Nation Founded Upon A Monumental Lie

The Atlantic in an article titled, Why Does the United States Give So Much Money to Israel?, attempted to explain the
reasoning behind the otherwise unreasonable and unprecedented assistance by claiming:

Defenders of the deal would say it's necessary. Dalton described the uptick in spending as a natural extension of
the long-standing relationship between the United States and Israel, "as well as close ties between those countries
and their peoples."

She described the "fraught neighborhood" surrounding Israel: war-torn Syria to the northeast, Hezbollah-influenced
Lebanon to the north, and an Islamist insurgency in Egypt's Sinai to the south, all of which help explain the
historically high promise of $5 billion in missile funding over the next 10 years."

However, experienced geopolitical analysts will point out that the United States does not have "friends," "allies," or
"relationships" - only interests and those who serve them.

And while The Atlantic attempts to explain the deal as a means of maintaining a "relationship," it and other publications
admit that there are "strings attached." If examined carefully, these strings reveals just what interests this supposed
"relationship" serves.
Related: New IDF chief rabbi: Soldiers can rape Arab women to boost morale

CNBC would say just that in its article, Big US military aid package to Israel has strings attached, claiming:

...it's structured so that more Israeli defense spending goes to U.S. companies. Israel's long-standing special
arrangement for funds from the United States previously allowed Israel to spend 26 percent of the money in Israel -
on Israeli-made defense products. But that provision is being phased out over the first five years of the deal."

In other words, the ten year, $38 billion aid package is first and foremost welfare for US defense contractors, not
Israel whose own defense spending adds up to $16 billion per year - dwarfing annual US "aid." The deal is to encourage
further Israeli dependency on America - dependency that lends Washington further leverage over both Israel and the
region.

The purpose of aid and those who have arranged it on both the Israeli and American sides of the negotiating table is to
continue directing Israel's domestic and foreign policy to suit America's interests, not the Israeli people's.

An Israel at peace with its neighbors in a stable Middle East and North Africa is an Israel that negates the supposed
need of a US presence in the region. It also negates the need for such extravagant defense spending in both Israel and
the United States.
Related: $40 billion aid to Israel is largest ever to any country, says Susan Rice

CNBC would also reveal that the new assistance package would include provisions making it difficult for Israel to lobby
for additional spending unless war broke out.

Considering the track record of various Israeli regimes, does one suppose this is an incentive for Israel to avoid conflict,
or actively seek it out?

In every way the aid deal is meant to perpetuate unpopular regimes, unpopular and inhumane policies, as well as
perpetuate conflict and human misery.

The role the US plays in "stabilizing" the Middle East is revealed instead as a constant conspiracy to overturn it.

US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia - Trifecta of Conflict and Instability

The only other nation in the Middle East sowing as much conflict and instability as Israel's current regime is Saudi
Arabia. It has flooded Iraq and Syria with militant groups triggering years of devastating war as well as directly launched an
extensive air and ground war against neighboring Yemen.
Saudi Arabia - like Israel - is the recipient of extensive US backing. While the US made history by granting Israel
unprecedented foreign aid, it sealed with Saudi Arabia recently an equally historic and unprecedented weapons
deal amounting to some $60 billion - a single deal significantly larger than the 10 year aid package the US is providing
Israel.

Israel's Haaretz would report in its article, U.S. Announces $60b Arms Sale to Saudi Arabia, Says 'Israel Doesn't Object',
that:

The United States plans to sell up to $60 billion worth of military aircraft to Saudi Arabia, the U.S. State
Department announced on Wednesday in a move designed to shore up a region overshadowed by Iran.

Andrew Shapiro, the assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs, told a news conference the U.S.
administration did not anticipate any objections to the sale from Israel, traditionally wary of arms sales to nearby
Arab countries."

Indeed, Israel does not object to US weapon deals with Saudi Arabia. Despite feigned adversity between the two regimes,
the governments of Israel and Saudi Arabia work in tandem toward a singular regional vision with very few points of
contention and with the common denominator being the way each nation's role enhances their joint sponsor - the United
States - and its hegemony over the region.

It is then not surprising to see US-funded Israeli forces defending Saudi subsidized terrorists on the Golan Heights
coordinating violence against Syrian forces throughout the destructive, ongoing Syrian conflict.
Unlike Saudi Arabia, which does not exist as a functioning legitimate nation-state beyond its petrodollars and its US-backed
military power, Israel does possess the economic infrastructure and human capital to transition into a functioning,
independent nation-state - if only its population can overcome the engineered strategy of tension that has ensnared it for
decades and the regime behind it.

The United States' $38 billion is to ensure that regime remains in power for another 10 years, the strategy of tension
continues to play out, and the Israeli people, as well as their neighbors are denied any opportunity to live in peace and move
forward in progress for another decade to come.

Rather than underwriting Israel's security for the next decade, the US is ensuring Israel struggles under another 10 years
of uncertainty, perpetually impending war, all while its regime continues to partner with neighboring regimes - including
Saudi Arabia and Turkey - to undermine regional stability and further threaten the future of the Israeli people and the
survival of the Israeli nation.

The Israeli regime's signing of yet another compromising, dependency-inducing aid package with the United States is proof
once again that Israel's own government constitutes the Israeli nation's worst enemy.
Related: Top Israeli General Speaks Out Against Israels Crimes Against Palestinians + Parallels Between Israel &
1930's Germany & Ten Facts Why Netanyahu Is A Criminal And That Israel Is A Rogue State

Comment: Perhaps Israel has been given too little credit here for its manipulative controls, global infiltration and
concentration of pathocracy.

Documentary Reveals How Israel Convinces Americans: Palestine Occupies Israel

In this episode of Behind the Headline, host Mint Press Mnar Muhawesh meets Sut Jhally, an
expert on media manipulation and propaganda. In the film The Occupation of the American Mind,
Jhally and others examine how high-paid spin doctors control the media message on Israel.
Following the Holocaust, the world community - led by the United States and Britain - sought to create a European
Jewish-only state.

This humanitarian move, though, utterly failed in respecting the humanity of the lands indigenous inhabitants - Christian and
Muslim Palestinians.

Starting in December of 1947, their land and property was seized and destroyed to make way for the state of Israel, where
white only European Jews would live . Over 750,000 Palestinians were expelled and over 10,000 were killed by the British
and US armed Zionist militias, and later Israeli forces, during the Nakba, an Arabic word meaning catastrophe.

Those expelled by the Nakba and their Palestinian descendants who make up the worlds largest refugee population in the
world are not allowed to return to their land.

Yet a recent poll found that nearly half of Americans believe Palestine occupies Israel - not the other way around.

Thats because the mainstream, corporate-owned media continues to spin a propaganda wheel that dehumanizes
Palestinians and paints Israel as a beacon of democracy.
Related: Google under fire for replacing Palestine from its maps with Israel

Meanwhile, special interest groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, buy their way into the
hearts and minds of our elected officials. Ever wonder why Israel gets $3 billion in annual military funding from Uncle Sam?
Connect the dots from the campaign contributions to the spending bills.

Theres a lot riding on our relationship with Israel: Apart from serving as a proxy for U.S. relations in the Middle East and
Africa, Israel is Americas second-top destination for arms exports. Yep - the countrys thats no bigger than the state of New
Jersey is basically a black check for the military-industrial complex.

But not all Americans are on board with the notion of Israel as the victim of Palestinian oppression.

Important: Gaza In Context

Another study showed that 62 percent of the population now believes Israel gets too much foreign aid, and the Boycott,
Divestment and Sanctions movement has made waves across the world, imposing a kind of sanction against Israels
economy by targeting Israeli products.

A new documentary, The Occupation of the American Mind, brings attention to how Israels public relations campaign has
successfully manipulated the narrative of the Israel-Palestine conflict in that, its not a conflict at all but a matter of
modern-day colonialism, ethnic cleansing and apartheid.
Today Im joined by Sut Jhally, executive producer of The Occupation of the American Mind and a professor of
communication at the University of Massachusetts. The film was produced, written and directed by Loretta Alper and Jeremy
Earp.

I asked Jhally to explain how Americans are being kept in the dark about Palestine, and how that prevents a mass
movement against Israeli apartheid from forming in the U.S.

Learn more about the US war in Afghanistan fueling the worldwide heroin crisis, and Israels occupation of American minds:

Related Articles:

How Israel Benefits from Living with Terror


The 1967 Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty

This is not Gaza After Israeli Invasion

Palestinians inside Israel Are under Attack

Western Media Credibility In Free Fall Collapse: Case In Point: UN Peace Council: The
US Media Is Lying To The American people: The War In Syria Is Not A Civil War, It's A
Proxy Invasion By The United States
September 28 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / RedFlagNews

The latest from the Gallup Poll is that only 32% of Amerians trust the print and TV media to tell the
truth. Republicans, 18 to 49 year old Americans, and independents trust the media even less, with
trust rates of 14%, 26%, and 30%.

The only group that can produce a majority that still trusts the media are Democrats with a 51% trust rate in print
and TV reporting. The next highest trust rate is Americans over 50 years of age with a trust rate of 38 percent.

Related: YouTube Has Quietly Begun Censoring Journalists Who Criticize Government

The conclusion is that old people who are Democrats are the only remaining group that barely trusts the media. This
mistaken trust is due to their enculturation. For older Democrats belief in government takes the place of Republican belief in
evangelical Christianity.

Older Democrats are firm believers that it was government under the leadership of President Franklin D. Roosevelt that
saved America from the Great Depression. As the print and TV media in the 21st century are firmly aligned with the
government, the trust in government spills over into trust of the media that is serving the government.

As the generation of Democrats enculturated with this mythology die off, Democratic trust rates will plummet toward
Republican levels.
It is not difficult to see why trust in the media has collapsed. The corrupt Clinton regime, which we might be on the verge of
repeating, allowed a somewhat diverse and independent media to be 90% acquired by six mega-corporations. The result
was the disappearance of independence in reporting and opinion.

The constraints that corporate ownership and drive for profits put on journalistic freedom and resources reduced reporting to
regurgitations of government and corporate press releases, always the cheapest and uncontroversial way to report.

With journalistic families driven out of journalism by estate taxes, the few remaining newspapers become acquisitions like a
trophy wife or a collector Ferrari.
Jeff Bezos, CEO and founder of amazon.com, handed over $250 million in cash for the Washington Post. Jeff might be a
whiz in e-commerce, but when it comes to journalism he could just as well be named Jeff Bozo.

On September 12, Washington Post reporter Cindy Boren dropped the Washington Post below the level of the supermarket
tabloid, National Enquirer. One must wonder where her editor was.

Drunk perhaps? The Washington Post actually reported that a Nigerian MD, Bennet Omalu, whose credentials and tenacity
are well known, has concluded that Hillary Clintons obvious medical problems could be due to her being poisoned by a
Putin-Trump conspiracy.

Related: The man who discovered CTE thinks Hillary Clinton may have been poisoned

One could possibly conclude that Cindy Boren and her Washington Post editor were having fun with Omalu, except that the
article repeated the unfounded allegation that circumstantial evidence according to a UK inquiry associates Putin with the
poisoning death of Litvinenko.
In other words, first Litvinenko, now Hillary.

If circumstantial evidence is to be the Washington Posts guide, then clearly that evidence suggests that the
neoconservatives, well-ensconced in high government positions and desperate for a New Pearl Harbor in order to launch
their wars of hegemony in the Middle East, are responsible for 9/11.

Yet the Washington Post has a full-time reporter whose job is to disparage conspiracy theories while the Washington Post
itself launches the conspiracy theory of the century: Putin And Trump Conspiracy Poisons US Democratic Candidate for
President.

Related: Washington Post Grasps at Crazy Conspiracy Theory in Support of Hillary Clinton

If intelligence, or perhaps simply sufficient time in Americans lives to investigate the news, were not in such short supply,
possibly Americans would reflect on what the benefit is of being driven by Washington into conflict with Russia and China.

UN Peace Council: The US Media Is Lying To The American People. The War In Syria Is
Not A Civil War, It's A Proxy Invasion By The United States.

US Peace Council Representatives CONFRONT a hostile American press after visiting Syria, and
learning that the American people are being lied to, grossly lied to.
A long video, but worth watching if you care to know the truth about what is going on in Syria and how Obama has
been lying to us... again.

Syria: Attack on Aid Convoy Kills Twenty, Destroys Aid, And Obliterates US War
Crimes In Support Of ISIS-Daesh Terror Group?
September 23 2016 | From: GlobalResearch

The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military
attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the
nation. Candidate Barack Obama, December, 2007
As the US heaps blame and accusations on Russia and Syria for the alleged air strike on the aid convoy on Monday
19th September, as ever there are more questions than answers and whatever US spokespersons state,
absolutely no certainties.

Related: Voices from Syria: This Country is being Violated by Terrorists who Destroy History, and People

The only undeniable fact is that another tragedy killed at least twenty Syrian Arab Red Crescent volunteers and the
organisations local Director Omar Barakat, father of nine. At least eighteen of the thirty one-truck convoy were destroyed
with the warehouse where humanitarian aid was stored.

The Russian Defence Ministry has categorically denied any attack and claims the convoy caught fire:

"We have studied video footage from the scene from so-called activists in detail and did not find any evidence that
the convoy had been struck by ordnance, commented Igor Konashenkov, a Ministry spokesman.

There are no craters and the exterior of the vehicles do not have the kind of damage consistent with blasts caused
by bombs dropped from the air.

Related: Russian defense ministry confirms US drone was present in area of attack on UN convoy

His observations are hard to challenge, anyone who has studied the assaults of the "international community" on far away
countries over the last decades knows what a bombed truck looks like, what fragments remains of it .

Photographs of the affected lorries show burned out vehicles, metal skeleton intact.
Related: After Bombing Syrian Army, US Accuses Russia of Bombing Aleppo Aid Convoy

Konashenkov said that damage visible in footage was instead the result of cargo igniting oddly occurring at the same
time as militants (formerly Nusra Front) had started a big offensive in nearby Aleppo, backed by tanks, artillery and other
heavy equipment.

He added:

"Only representatives of the White Helmets organization close to the Nusra Front who, as always, found
themselves at the right time in the right place by chance with their video cameras can answer who did this and
why.

Indeed the White Helmets boasted in a video of being on the scene within moments.

The White Helmets who have had the gall to entitle themselves the Syrian Civil Defence Force are seemingly neither
Syrian, nor Civil, nor Defence. Vanessa Beeley who has meticulously charted their antics points out:

"This is an alleged non-governmental organization that so far has received funding from at least three
major NATO governments, including $23 million from the US Government and $29 million (19.7 million)
from the UK Government, $4.5 million (4 million) from the Dutch Government.

In addition, it receives material assistance and training funded and run by a variety of other EU Nations.
Related: Ceasefire in ruins: Putin - the US can not separate "healthy" opposition in Syria from terrorists

She informs of such concerns regarding the organization that:

"A request has been put into the EU Secretary General to provide all correspondence relating to the funding and
training of the White Helmets. By law this information must be made transparent and available to the public.

Beeley points out: There has been a concerted campaign by a range of investigative journalists to expose the true roots of
the White Helmets. The most damning statement, however (comes from) their funders and backers in the US State
Department who attempted to explain the US deportation of the prominent White Helmet leader, Raed Saleh, from Dulles
airport on the 18th April 2016.

Of the incident, Mark Toner, State Department spokesman stated:

"And any individual again, Im broadening my language here for specific reasons, but any individual in any group
suspected of ties or relations with extremist groups or that we had believed to be a security threat to the United
States, we would act accordingly. But that does not, by extension, mean we condemn or would cut off ties to the
group for which that individual works for.

Figure that one, Dear Reader.

The Ron Paul Institute has pointed out:


"We have demonstrated that the White Helmets are an integral part of the propaganda vanguard that
ensures obscurantism of fact and propagation of Human Rights fiction that elicits the well-intentioned and
self righteous response from a very cleverly duped public.

A priority for these NGOs is to keep pushing the No Fly Zone scenario which has already been seen to have
disastrous implications for innocent civilians in Libya, for example.

What better chance to push the No Fly Zone scenario than arriving within moments of the convoy tragedy, filming it and
creating a propaganda scenario before any meaningful forensic investigation could even be started, since the trucks were
still burning. And of course, the White Helmets, aka Syrian Defence Force, were filming rather than attempting to put out
the fire and rescue those in the burning trucks.

The Russian Defence Ministry subsequently caused outrage by claiming that Drone footage: shows bombed Syrian aid
convoy included truck full of militant fighters carrying mortar guns.

However: The footage emerged as the United Nations rowed back from describing the attack on the aid convoy as air
strikes, saying it did not have conclusive evidence about what had happened.

It must be asked, why on earth, after long and protracted negotiations over the convoy would Syria and or their
Russian ally risk the wrath of US and coalition further decimation of the country by laying themselves open to
accusations of bombing and aid convoys?

The tragedy has emphatically achieved one thing, however. Wiped from the headlines is another atrocity the US bombing
which killed over sixty Syrian soldiers and wounded over a hundred others just two days earlier, on Saturday
17th September, causing Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova to comment:
We are reaching a really terrifying conclusion for the whole world: That the White House is defending
Islamic State. Now there can be no doubts about that, according to the RIA Novosti news agency.

Again Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Who will guard the guards?

UN Security Council Holds High-Level Meeting On Syria

The United Nations Security Council is held a high-level meeting on Syria in New York on
Wednesday, September 21, on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.

The meeting, chaired by New Zealands Prime Minister John Key, started with a briefing on Colombia, followed by a
discussion of the situation in the Middle East, with special focus on Syria, after the US-Russia brokered ceasefire collapsed
due to US bombing of Syrian government forces, and the subsequent attack on the Aleppo aid convoy.

Why Washington Had To Wreck The Syrian Ceasefire

Finian Cunningham explains that the CIA and Pentagon had to wreck the Syrian ceasefire in order
to prevent the world discovering that there are no moderate Syrian rebels.
All of the so-called rebels are part of a US organized group of jihadists tasked with bringing chaos to Syria.

Cunningham makes clear that the US has no print and TV media, just a collection of whores who lie for their living. For the
article visit: StrategicCulture

Related: Lavrov Makes History: 'Ceasefires' were bogus, nixes future 'unilateral measures'

Paul Craig Roberts "Russia Didn't Attack The UN Aid Convoy, It's A False Flag"!

Related: Russian Defense Ministry: Aid convoy in Aleppo followed by terrorists truck with mortar

We Are The Death Merchant Of The World: Ex-Bush Official Lawrence Wilkerson
Condemns Military-Industrial Complex
September 14 2016 | From: Salon / Various

The military-industrial complex "is much more pernicious than Eisenhower ever thought," says the
retired US colonel.

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson is tired of the corporate interests that we go abroad to slay monsters for.

Related: Who Really Owns and Controls the Military-Industrial Complex and What Are They Doing? An Extensive
Research Report

As the former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, Wilkerson played an important role in the George W. Bush
administration. In the years since, however, the former Bush official has established himself as a prominent critic of U.S.
foreign policy.

I think Smedley Butler was onto something, explained Lawrence Wilkerson, in an extended interview with Salon.

In his day, in the early 20th century, Butler was the highest ranked and most honored official in the history of the U.S. Marine
Corps. He helped lead wars throughout the world over a series of decades, before later becoming a vociferous opponent of
American imperialism, declaring war is a racket.
Wilkerson spoke highly of Butler, referencing the late generals famous quote:

Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in
three districts. I operated on three continents.

I think the problem that Smedley identified, quite eloquently actually, Wilkerson said, especially for a Marine - I
had to say that as a soldier, the retired Army colonel added with a laugh;

I think the problem is much deeper and more profound today, and much more subtle and sophisticated.

Today, the military-industrial complex is much more pernicious than Eisenhower ever thought it would
be, Wilkerson warned.

In his farewell address in 1961, former President Dwight D. Eisenhower famously cautioned Americans that the military and
corporate interests were increasingly working together, contrary to the best interests of the citizenry. He called this
phenomenon the military-industrial complex.
As a case study of how the contemporary military-industrial complex works, Wilkerson pointed to leading weapons
corporations like Lockheed Martin, and their work with draconian, repressive Western-allied regimes in the Gulf, or in
inflaming tensions in Korea.

Was Bill Clintons expansion of NATO - after George H. W. Bush and [his Secretary of State] James Baker had
assured Gorbachev and then Yeltsin that we wouldnt go an inch further east - was this for Lockheed Martin, and
Raytheon, and Boeing, and others, to increase their network of potential weapon sales? Wilkerson asked.

You bet it was, he answered.

Is there a penchant on behalf of the Congress to bless the use of force more often than not because of the
constituencies they have and the money they get from the defense contractors? Wilkerson continued.

Again, he answered his own question: You bet.

Its not like Dick Cheney or someone like that went and said lets have a war because we want to make money for
Halliburton, but it is a pernicious on decision-making, the former Bush official explained.

And the fact that they donate so much money to congressional elections and to PACs and so forth is another
pernicious influence.

Those who deny this are just being utterly naive, or they are complicit too, Wilkerson added.

And some of my best friends work for Lockheed Martin, along with Raytheon, Boeing and Halliburton, he
quipped.

Wilkerson - who in the same interview with Salon defended Edward Snowden, saying the whistle-blower performed an
important service and did not endanger U.S. national security - was also intensely critical of the growing movement
to privatize public functions, like prisons.
Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

I fault us Republicans for this majorly, he confessed - although a good many prominent Democrats have also
jumped on the neoliberal bandwagon.

In a 2011 speech, for instance, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared, Its time for the United States to start
thinking of Iraq as a business opportunity for U.S. corporations.

Wilkerson lamented, Weve privatized the ultimate public function: war.

In many respects it is now private interests that benefit most from our use of military force, he continued.

Whether its private security contractors, that are still all over Iraq or Afghanistan, or its the bigger-known defense
contractors, like the number one in the world, Lockheed Martin.

Journalist Antony Loewenstein detailed how the U.S. privatized its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in another interview with
Salon. There are an estimated 30,000 military contractors working for the Pentagon in Afghanistan today;
they outnumber U.S. troops three-to-one. Thousands more are in Iraq.

Lockheed Martin simply plans to sell every aspect of missile defense that it can, regardless of whether it is needed,
Wilkerson said. And what is best to maximize corporate interest is by no means necessarily the same as what is best for
average citizens.

We dwarf the Russians or anyone else who sells weapons in the world, the retired Army colonel continued.
We are the death merchant of the world.

Related: The Greatest Threat to Our Freedoms: Governments of Scoundrels, Spies, Thieves, Ruffians, Rapists and
Killers

The 5th Eye


September 11 2016 | From: NZIFF / CutCutCut

This densely packed doco from the directors of Operation 8 questions the price of New Zealands
involvement in the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, and relates the improbable tale of its 2008
sabotage by the Waihopai Three.

If our PM or the relevant public servants feel truly comfortable about New Zealands participation in the Five Eyes
intelligence alliance, it doesnt show when they are seen explaining it, defending it, or downright refusing to talk
about it in this documentary.

The disavowals we see are a matter of public record, but filmmakers Errol Wright and Abi King-Jones (Operation 8) embed
those TV interviews, parliamentary declamations and media ops in a concise history of New Zealands post war dependency
on the United States.

For lucid, more confidently-held commentary, the filmmakers turn to inveterate watchdogs such as Nicky Hager, Jane
Kelsey, Murray Horton and Paul Buchanan, but evolve a position of their own through the accumulation and agile
juxtaposition of some very telling material.

They also thread an unlikely tale of protest through this scenario, following the actions of the three earnest bumblers who,
against all odds, successfully damaged the Waihopai spy station in 2008. A priest, a subsistence farmer and a teacher, they
acted out of Christian conviction, claiming Five Eyes implicated New Zealanders in the murder of children in Iraq.
When they ran that argument in court, the jury acquitted them. No Crown witness was summoned to contradict them. When
the GCSB has been so often in the news, with Kim Dotcom frequently in tow, theres likely to be an audience, less heroic
perhaps, thats simply grateful to this film for providing a blow-by-blow account of the GCSBs misadventures and their
expanding powers to make suspects of all of us.

For screening information visit: NZIFF

Jeremy Corbyn: 9/11 Was 'Manipulated' + Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK
And Israel As Being The Actual 9/11 Terrorists & RT Declares 9/11 An Inside Job
September 29 2015 | From: TheTelegraph / MethodicalDeception / WorldTruthTV / RT

In comments that will raise questions about his suitability to lead the Labour Party, Mr Corbyn
appeared to blame George Bush and Tony Blair for using the September 11 attacks in New York to
allow them to go to war. Comment: If you are like me you are sick of the flogging of the 9/11 horse -
however busting this wide open is a key necessity and the developments just keep coming...
Jeremy Corbyn has claimed that 9/11 was "manipulated" to make it look like Osama Bin Laden was responsible to
allow the West to go to war in Afghanistan. [And he has the corrupt cabal-western governments crapping
themselves].

Note: This article and the following article are archival


They have been reposted because of their importance and significance given the date today. Anybody who
now cannot see that the events of September 11 2001 were visited upon the world by 'the cabal' is either in
dential or they have rocks in their head.

New Related Articles:

Scientific Study: Towers Collapsed Due To Controlled Demolition

The Tyranny of 9/11: The Building Blocks of the American Police State from A-Z

9/11 Unanswered Questions: Mysterious September 11, 2001 Breakfast Meeting on Capitol Hill

The Destruction of All Three World Trade Center Skyscrapers on September 11, 2001, The Collapse of
WTC 7

The Post 9/11 Era: Fifteen Years of Americas War on Terror. Years of Horror inflicted on the People of
the Middle East

Video: 9/11 Opens up an Era of Crisis, Social Upheaval and Global Warfare. The Crimes Committed in the
Name of 9/11

September 11, 2001: The 15th Anniversary of the Crime and Cover-up of the Century

Saudi Arabias Alleged Involvement in the 9/11 Attacks and the 28 Pages: Red-Herring, Propaganda Ploy
The Propaganda Preparation of 9/11: The Mysterious Death of John ONeill, FBI Counterterror Chief in
Charge of the Osama bin Laden Investigation

Given the exceptionally grave nature of this admission and its repercussions, one would suppose that Baer has
been questioned by other media and/or the FBI and made to discuss in detail precisely who it was who cashed out
and how he knew about the 9/11 plot in advance. But one would be wrong. Since making this stunning admission to
the cameras of We Are Change Los Angeles, no one has ever asked Baer for more information about the case.

In comments that will raise questions about his suitability to lead the Labour Party, Mr Corbyn appeared to blame George
Bush and Tony Blair for using the September 11 attacks in New York to allow them to go to war.

In a series of further articles, Mr Corbyn also appears to endorse controversial conspiracy theories about a New World
Order.

...

Mr Corbyn was heavily criticised in the days before winning the Labour leadership after suggesting that the [apparent] death
of Osama Bin Laden was a tragedy. In the 2003 article for The Morning Star newspaper, Mr Corbyn wrote:

"Historians will study with interest the news manipulation of the past 18 months. After September 11, the claims
that bin Laden and al-Qaida had committed the atrocity were quickly and loudly made.

This was turned into an attack on the Taliban and then, subtly, into regime change in Afghanistan.

However, in previous years he wrote a series of articles which appear to have endorsed the conspiracy theory about the New
World Order.

The New World Order conspiracy is frequently linked to theories about the so-called Illuminati and claims about a
totalitarian world government.

In an article for Labour Briefing in 1991, Mr Corbyn wrote:

"We now know that the Gulf War was a curtain-raiser for the New World Order: the rich and powerful, white and
western will be able to maintain the present economic order with free use of all the weapons they wish for.

That same year, he said in Socialist Campaign Group News:

"The aim of the war machine of the United States is to maintain a world order dominated by the banks and
multinational companies of Europe and North America.
The following year, in a piece for Labour Peace Action, Mr Corbyn said:

"What is required now is a bold, democratic alternative to the New World Order. The US veto at the Earth summit
in Rio... shows just who calls the shots in this New World Order and who will be asked to foot the bill.

Mr Corbyn has previously shared a platform with Ken O'Keefe, who has alleged that President Bush was a member of The
New World Order who had orchestrated the September 11 attacks for personal gain.

The phrase was also used in a speech by George H.W Bush. Mr Corbyns spokesman refused to deny that the new Labour
leader was referring to the New World Order conspiracy theory in his articles.

Related: Gordon Campbell on the PMs TPP concessions on medicines

9/11: From Cheney to MOSSAD


From: MethodicalDeception

On Thursday, September 9, 2015 author Rebekah Roth was interviewed about her new book 'Methodical Deception'.
New information she has recovered about the 9/11 false flag event will shock you to your core. This bombshell
evidence destroys the "official story", forever. Israeli Mossad involvement in the 9/11 false flag attacks can no longer
be denied.

Further Related Detail: Preparing the WTC for Destruction

To watch the FULL 75+ minute SGT Report interview click here.

Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel as Being The Actual 9/11
Terrorists
Undoubtedly the 9/11 attacks on New York City and Washington DC are the most misrepresented by officialdom in
US history.
"9/11 was an Anglo-American black operation executed in collusion with Israeli Secret Services and Saudi Arabian
financiers.

- 9/11 Investigator

Whereas the assassination of John F. Kennedy is now understood to have been a classic CIA Execution Plan, it does not
come close to 9/11 in terms of the number and magnitude of outright falsehoods, misleading statements, fake science and
fraudulent facts submitted by officials and agents of the US Government.

The official 9/11 Commission Report stands as the most fabricated document ever produced by US tax dollars. Not only did
the investigation avoid every serious inquiry about how two steel frame building came down after being dustified in NYC, it
also subverted every initiative to ferret out the truth.

It appears that Russia has been conducting systematic data dumps on 9/11, the release of which represents more factual
information on the attacks than any US Government source. In the wake of the Anglo-American coup dtat conducted by the
CIA and MI6 in Kiev, it appears that Russia has no more patience for Western interference.

Especially when nations are destabilized on Russias borders do the stakes in this highly consequential geopolitical chess
match go up.

Since Vladimir Putin has no intention of starting World War 3, he can only respond to US-EU meddling by using asymmetric
warfare on the internet. Were the American people to understand that the US Federal Government perpetrated the 9/11
destruction, everything would change in a heartbeat.

Because the Obama Administration has shown no sign of aborting its planned takeover of the Ukraine, Russia is left with very
few, but still quite potent options.
Operation Terror
The 9/11 story you are not supposed to
know.
Based on actual under-reported 9/11 events.

James McCullough from the mysterious "Council" gives


a special assignment to CIA agent Aaron Delgado to
attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and
pin the blame on Muslim Terrorists.

Delgado and fellow agents, Phillip Singer and Chase


Jordan, work with a group of unsuspecting engineers to
develop unmanned jets that will hit their assigned
targets.The Army and the FBI begin to uncover the plot,
forcing Delgado to intervene.

The CIA agents also have to deal with an increasingly


suspicious George Poole, the lead engineer working on
the drones, who becomes skeptical on how the remote
controlled planes will be used. A

battle between good and evil ensues as the plot to


attack America becomes a hard-hitting reality.

See the trailer below and the full movie


at: OperationTerror

The following excerpt recently appeared on an alternative news website - Veterans Today - under the subtitle Too Classified
to Publish. Essentially this unprecedented release of ultra-secret and highly classified information illustrates Putins new tack
toward Western intractability. Simply put, Russia will no longer stand by idly while the Anglo-American Juggernaut projects it
power wherever it so chooses.

"Too Classified to Publish"

According to a retired FXX agent specializing in Israeli counter intel: The type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified
version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus
stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era.

Chemical analysis done by DOE Sandi was able to identify the chemical/radiation footprint or fingerprint of the warheads
based on samples taken after 911 of the fallout at ground zero. (Editors note: Nuclear weapon use at ground zero is
confirmed from multiple sources)

All plutonium based warheads have a chemical fingerprint that can identify the type of design and where the PU was made
and how old it is. This was the 911 blackmail on Bush 1 and 2, the illegal transfer of surplus US nuclear weapons to the
Israelis and why the continued cover up, along with the stolen gold and stock fraud that was going on Wall Street etc.
According to file ENW57.pdf on page 66. (Editors note: Document received and confirmed)
Only a 2 kiloton device was needed to drop the buildings. A 2 kiloton device will produce a fireball of apx 150 to 200 feet in
diameter at over 4000 degrees Centigrade. Just large enough to melt the I beams of the central core of the building and drop
them in place.

The light flash would last less than 1 second and primarily be in the UV light range. Overpressure would only be at 60PSI max
and directed upwards with the blast. See underground effect.

Fallout would be minimal and located to within ground zero range only. Radiation would drop to acceptable levels within 72
hrs. after the blast. Most fall out was trapped in the cement dust thus causing all of the recent cancer deaths that we are now
seeing in NYC amongst first responders. (Editors note: Consistent with site data)
High FluxIsotope Reactor Core Cross Section

Melted steel and iron oxide or nano thermite is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray / Neutron flux induced into the
central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into iron oxide consuming the carbon and silicone in the steel.

This explains the missing steel columns and the very important clue of the vaporized 20 ton antenna tower atop the south
tower. The upward blast of radiation literally vaporized it. Video evidence proves this to be true. (Editors note: Tower issue a
vital one.)

The total XXOO data file from DOE Sandia on the 911 event is well over 72 MB. P.S. Snowden didnt have a Q clearance so
he missed this one. Carnaberry had a pretty good stash of documents on the subject. (All under the transit stuff.) The entire
nuclear nonproliferation story of stolen nuclear material coming from Russia was an Israeli cover story to hide the original
source of weapons material coming from the US stock piles. (Editors note: Fully confirmed)

Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this
scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign country as IOUs in order to
get what they wanted. Tom Countryman a well-known Israeli operative is curiously now in charge of N.N.P. at the State
Department under Obama.(?) He was put there by Ram Emanuel.
It appears that the weapon of choice for the Israelis were
the W-54 and follow on series of nuclear pits taken from the
Amarillo TX storage dump. This was what Carnaberry was
working on for Bush senior in Houston.

A total of over 350 pits were transferred to the Israelis over


a 10 to 20 year period of time. The W-54 type of pit design
were the most desirable due to the 2 point implosion pit
design.

This is the easiest to re manufacture and modify as


compared to other circular pit designs.

The pill shaped design of the W-54 type weapon contains


over 1.5 times more plutonium than a standard pit. This
Early Israeli core model would allow enough Plutonium to be recovered that was still
of weapons grade use even after 32 plus years of age.
Americium build up in the pit over time eventually makes the Pit unusable as a weapon so they have a limited shelf life based
on how fast or slow the Plutonium was produce in the reactor at Stanford.

Usually it was about 150 days max. Irradiation time in the reactor during production determines the shelf life of the pit as
weapons grade material. All of the micro nukes used by the Israelis are re-manufactured W-54 type series devices.

Khazelov confirmed this a micro nuke bombing

These devices were used in the Bali bombing and the London bombing and in Japan on their reactors. (Editors note: Nuclear
weapon use in Bali confirmed) Also used in Damascus, Iraq and Afghanistan by the US. (Editors note: Multiple confirmation
including site samples.)
These are stored in most Israelite embassies for ease of deployment. The ones used on 911 were kept at the Israeli
consulate in NYC until put in place. After 911 the FBI now checks all diplomatic pouches with a Geiger counter before
entering or leaving the US.

The South African weapons were also surplus W-54 artillery shells acquired from Israeli and final assembly and testing was
done in South Africa with Israel assistance. (Editors note: This explains Pelendaba production issues.)

Note the melted rock under the foundations of the WTC in the two images above - this can only be caused by the extremely intense heat generated in
a nuclear detonation

This was done because the Israelis needed a testing ground in order to make sure that there rebuilt weapons would work as
designed. (Editors note: Testing on Sept. 22, 1979 multiple confirmations.) The North Korean weapons are also of the 155
mm artillery design as provided by Israel.

The true North Korean nuclear weapons program is based on nuclear artillery use and not missiles. The plan is to use a
massive artillery barge on South Korea if war breaks out this include the use of small nuclear artillery shells to counter US
tanks rockets and artillery.

The Saudis also have a stash of W-54s acquired from the US under Bush2. (Editors note: Confirmed) The Israelis have also
provided them to India, Brazil, China, Taiwan, Japan, North and South Korea etc. (Editors note: All but South Korea
confirmed. Canada had been believed to be the source of Brazilian nuclear weapons.) Dimona is a standard 75 megawatt
thermal open top reactor as used in France for their plutonium weapons production program, their version of
Stanford (Editors note: Probably Hanford).
Dismona, Israel

Due to over use as a fast breeder reactor by the Israelis, Dimona suffered a steam explosion IE a flash over indecent due to
neutron criticality back in the late 1980s under Bush 1. This shut down its operation for many years until repairs could be
made.

It know only operates at very low power levels due to neutron absorption damage to the containment vessel. Now mainly use
for isotope production. This forced the Israelis to turn to stolen nuclear stock piles from the US for the continuation of their
nuclear program.

The Israelis knowing that the nuclear material that they had acquire only had a limited shelf life left before it was no longer
usable as weapons grade then tried to dump it on the surplus market as fast as possible before it was of no use to them. So
they dumped it on unsuspecting nations who would only sit on it and not be able to test it. These were the fissile tests in North
Korea. (Editors note: Confirmed, multiple sources)

When everybody caught on to the scam such as Japan and Korea. (IE the Korean sub sinkings etc) they were angry because
they paid big bucks for junk. This started a mini cold war with Israel and her old clients. However with micro nukes even as
the plutonium ages it will still fissile producing a smaller size detonation well under 2 kiloton in size.
So they can still be used as small dirty bombs or as very small tactical nukes such as the nuclear artillery strikes on
Damascus with rocket assisted W-54s. (Editors note: Confirmed strike, May 4, 2013) On the W-54 pit design it is pill shaped
and it is only about 4 inches in diameter and weighs about 24 pounds.

Most of the fuel is consumed in the plasma fire ball when detonated so there is very little plutonium fallout left to escape. If it is
salted with other materials the fallout can be even reduced to lower levels such as in an enhanced radiation device or the so
called neutron bomb. This is what was used on 911.

The primary purpose of the nuclear weapon used on 911 was to produce a massive Gamma ray / neutron flux that would
vaporize about 150 to 300 feet of 6 inch thick steal I-beams that constituted the central core of the WTC buildings. This
created a free fall event as seen on TV that day.
Evidence was also found of demolition charges being placed on an angle on key structural suports. This was confirmed by demolition experts as being
a technique used to generate a free-fall demolition within a buildings own footprint

The flash would be hidden from sight due to the underground detonation. Most of the light was in the non-visible light
spectrum any way. Over pressure would be reduced to 6 psi due to the blast traveling up the central core and neutron
radiation vaporizing the TV antenna at the top of the building as see on TV.

The fallout would be mainly vaporized concrete cement and iron oxide. This is why after 911 they told everyone on TV that
the beta radiation burns that people were getting were due to the caustic cement dust and not due to the radiation effects
from the radioactive cement fallout. (Editors note: Fully confirmed)
The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams. This was the so called Nano Thermite that was
found everywhere. Fallout was limited to a 1 mile area around down town NYC. See charts. (Editors note: Received)

Radiation decay was reduced to safe low levels after 72 hrs., (Editors note: Fully confirmed) outside of ground zero its self.
This is why the area was blocked off from the public for 3 days after the event, in order to let the radiation drop to safe levels.

If you read this excerpt closely, you can clearly see that Russia means business. It is what they did not say - directly - that
makes this data-dump so poignant and dangerous to the Anglo-American power structure.

RT Declares 9/11 Was An Inside Job

United States Government Intentionally Destroyed 9/11 Evidence


June 9 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / WashingtonsBlog

If the story that the US government told us about 9/11 were true, why did the government destroy
the evidence, lie to the 9/11 Commission, and prevent a real investigation?

The clear and indisputable answer is that if the evidence had not been destroyed and a real investigation had
occurred, the conclusion would have been that 9/11 was an inside job designed to give the neoconservatives their
new Pearl Harbor necessary to launch their wars in the Middle East.

Related: Is the War on Terror a Falsity?

The extraordinary gullibility of the American people is responsible for 15 years of warfare, destroyed countries, and millions
of dead, maimed, orphaned, and displaced people, and for the rise of a police state in the United States. The ignorance and
gullibility of the American people are responsible for these massive crimes against humanity and for Americans loss of their
constitutionall protections.

Presumption of a Cover-Up

Judges and lawyers know that if someone intentionally destroys evidence hes probably trying to hide his
crime. American law has long recognized that destruction of evidence raises a presumption of guilt for the person who
destroyed the evidence.

So what does it mean when the US government intentionally destroyed massive amounts of evidence related to 9/11?

Related: CIA Veteran Announces Live on RT That All Terrorist Attacks in US Are False Flags

Judge and Prosecutor Destroy Evidence

For example, it was revealed last week that the judge overseeing the trial of surviving 9/11 suspects conspired with the
prosecution to destroy evidence relevant to a key suspects defense. And see this.

(The Defense Department has also farmed out most of the work of both prosecuting and defending the surviving 9/11
suspects to the same private company. And the heads of the military tribunal prosecuting the 9/11 suspects said that the
trials must be rigged so that there are no acquittals.)

Destruction of Videotapes

The CIA videotaped the interrogation of 9/11 suspects, falsely told the 9/11 Commission that there were no videotapes or
other records of the interrogations, and then illegally destroyed all of the tapes and transcripts of the interrogations.
Related: Obama Administration Caught Conspiring to Destroy Key 9/11 Evidence in Trial at Gitmo

9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton wrote:

Those who knew about those videotapes - and did not tell us about them - obstructed our investigation."

And:

Daniel Marcus, a law professor at American University who served as general counsel for the Sept. 11
commission and was involved in the discussions about interviews with Al Qaeda leaders, said he had heard
nothing about any tapes being destroyed."

If tapes were destroyed, he said, its a big deal, its a very big deal, because it could amount to obstruction of
justice to withhold evidence being sought in criminal or fact-finding investigations."

Related: How the CIA Writes History

Destruction of Air Traffic Control Tapes

The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand,
cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building as shown by this
NY Times article (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view) and by this article from the Chicago Sun-Times.
Black Boxes

The FBI long ago found and analyzed the black box recorders from the airplanes which hit the Twin Towers, but
has consistently denied that they were ever found.

Pentagon Fibs

The 9/11 Commissioners concluded that officials from the Pentagon lied to the Commission, and considered
recommending criminal charges for such false statements.

Soviet-Style Minders

The chairs of both the 9/11 Commission and the Official Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 said that Soviet-style government
minders obstructed the investigation into 9/11 by intimidating witnesses (and see this).

In other words, the minders obstructed witnesses from openly and candidly talking about what they knew.

Undermining Investigation

President Bush and Vice-President Cheney took the rare step of personally requesting that congress limit all 9/11
investigation solely to intelligence failures.
The administration also opposed the creation of a 9/11 commission. Once it was forced (by pressure from widows of 9-11
victims) to allow a commission to be formed, the administration appointed as executive director an administration insider,
whose area of expertise is the creation and maintenance of public myths thought to be true, even if not actually true, who
was involved in pre-9/11 intelligence briefings, and who was one of the key architects of the pre-emptive war doctrine.

This executive director, who controlled what the Commission did and did not analyze, then limited the scope of the
Commissions inquiry so that the overwhelming majority of questions about 9/11 remained unasked (see this and this).

The administration then starved the commission of funds. The government spent $175 million over $300 million in todays
dollars investigating the Challenger space shuttle disaster. It spent $152 million on the the Columbia disaster
investigation. It spent $30 million investigating the Monica Lewinsky scandal. But the government only authorized $15
million for the 9/11 Commission.
The government also failed to provide crucial documents to the 9/11 investigators. And see this.

The government refused to share much information with the Commission, refused to force high-level officials to testify under
oath, and allowed Bush and Cheney to be questioned jointly.

Moreover, as reported by ACLU, FireDogLake, RawStory and many others, declassified documents shows that Senior
Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001.

The 9-11 Commission took this warning to heart, and refused to examine virtually any evidence which contradicted the
administrations official version of events. As stated by the State Departments Coordinator for Counterterrorism who was
the point man for the U.S. governments international counterterrorism policy in the first term of the Bush administration
there were things the [9/11] commissions wanted to know about and things they didnt want to know about.

Saudi Role
Investigation into Saudi government aid to 9/11 conspirators was also obstructed.

For example, Philip Shenon the 20-year New York Times reporter who wrote a book on the 9/11 Commission reports:

The [911] commissioner said the renewed public debate could force a spotlight on a mostly unknown chapter of
the history of the 9/11 commission: behind closed doors, members of the panels staff fiercely protested the
way the material about the Saudis was presented in the final report, saying it underplayed or ignored
evidence that Saudi officials especially at lower levels of the government were part of an al-Qaida
support network that had been tasked to assist the hijackers after they arrived in the US.

In fact, there were repeated showdowns, especially over the Saudis, between the staff and the
commissions hard-charging executive director, University of Virginia historian Philip Zelikow, who joined
the Bush administration as a senior adviser to the secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, after leaving the
commission.

The staff included experienced investigators from the FBI, the Department of Justice and the CIA, as well as the
congressional staffer who was the principal author of the 28 pages.

Zelikow fired a staffer, who had repeatedly protested over limitations on the Saudi investigation, after she
obtained a copy of the 28 pages outside of official channels.

Other staffers described an angry scene late one night, near the end of the investigation, when two
investigators who focused on the Saudi allegations were forced to rush back to the commissions offices
after midnight after learning to their astonishment that some of the most compelling evidence about a
Saudi tie to 9/11 was being edited out of the report or was being pushed to tiny, barely readable footnotes
and endnotes.
The staff protests were mostly overruled.

***

But Kean, Hamilton and Zelikow clearly do not speak for a number of the other commissioners, who have
repeatedly suggested they are uncomfortable with the perception that the commission exonerated Saudi
Arabia and who have joined in calling for public release of the 28 pages."

Indeed, an FBI informant hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000. Specifically, investigators for the Congressional
Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when
the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and
that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House.

As the New York Times notes:

Senator Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat who is a former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee,
accused the White House on Tuesday of covering up evidence.

The accusation stems from the Federal Bureau of Investigations refusal to allow investigators for a Congressional
inquiry and the independent Sept. 11 commission to interview an informant, Abdussattar Shaikh, who had been the
landlord in San Diego of two Sept. 11 hijackers."
Letting Terrorists Go Free

A former FBI translator who Senators Leahy and Grassley, among others, have claimed is credible, and who the
administration has gagged for years without any logical basis - has stated that this administration knowingly and
intentionally let many directly or indirectly involved in that terrorist act [September 11th] go free untouched and
uninvestigated?

Destruction of Physical Evidence

The former head of fire science and engineering for the agency responsible for finding out why the Twin Towers and World
Trade Center 7 collapsed on 9/11 (the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology) who is one of the worlds
leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, with a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering wrote that evidence
necessary to determine the cause of the collapse of the World Trade Centers was being destroyed. And see this.

Note the demolition charges going off...

In addition, the official investigators themselves were largely denied access to the site and the evidence contained there, or
even access to such basic information as the blueprints for the World Trade Center.

The government has also refused to release the computer models showing how the trade centers fell, making it impossible
for anyone to double-check its assumptions.
Whether you believe the Twin Towers and World Trade Center building 7 were brought down with explosives or by airplanes
and fires, destroying evidence prevented engineers and scientists from figuring out what went wrong to prevent
skyscrapers from collapsing in the future.

9/11 Commissioners Disgusted and Call For a New Investigation

The 9/11 Commissioners publicly expressed anger at cover ups and obstructions of justice by the government into
a real 9/11 investigation:

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says I dont believe for a minute we got everything right, that the
Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate
should continueThe 9/11 Commission chair said the Commission was set up to fail

The Commissions co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) obstructed our investigation
9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative
to what we outlined in our version . . . We didnt have access . . . .

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were
getting

9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: It is a national scandal; This
investigation is now compromised; and One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11
issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up. When asked in 2009 if he thought
there should be another 9/11 commission, Cleland responded: There should be about fifteen 9/11 commissions

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staffs inquiry said At some level
of the government, at some point in timethere was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened. He
also said I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described. The tapes told a radically
different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin. This is not true.

The Co-Chair of the congressional investigation into 9/11 Bob Graham and 9/11 Commissioner and former
Senator Bob Kerrey are calling for either a PERMANENT 9/11 commission or a new 9/11 investigation to get to
the bottom of it

9/11 Commissioner John Lehman says that a new investigation should be vigorously pursued

Planting False Evidence

Planting false evidence is another act which creates presumption of guilt.


The type of torture used by the U.S. on alleged surviving 9/11 co-conspirators is of a special type. Senator Levin revealed
that the the U.S. used Communist torture techniques specifically aimed at creating FALSE confessions. (and
see this, this, this and this).

According to NBC News:

Much of the 9/11 Commission Report was based upon the testimony of people who were tortured

At least four of the people whose interrogation figured in the 9/11 Commission Report have claimed that they told
interrogators information as a way to stop being tortured

One of the Commissions main sources of information was tortured until he agreed to sign a confession that he
was NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO READ

The 9/11 Commission itself doubted the accuracy of the torture confessions, and yet kept their doubts to
themselves

Pulitzer-prize winning reporter Seymour Hersh who broke the Iraq torture and Vietnam massacre stories writes:

Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues that were uncovered about the terrorists identities
and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found.

A former high-level intelligence official told me, Whatever trail was left was left deliberately - for the F.B.I. to
chase.

I Am A Syrian Living In Syria: It Was Never A Revolution Nor A Civil War: The
Terrorists Are Sent By Your Government
September 10 2016 | From: GlobalResearch

"Your Obama and whoever is behind him or above him are supporting al Qaeda and leading a
proxy war on my country. We thought you are against al Qaeda and now you support them."
Two years ago, Majd wrote these words on a Facebook posting:

Related: 10 Facts the Mainstream Media Wont Tell You About the War in Syria

I am Syrian living in Syria in the middle of everything. We have seen horrors. It was never a revolution nor a civil
war. The terrorists are sent by your goverment.

They are al Qaeda Jabhat al Nusra Wahhabi Salafists Talibans etc and the like extremists jihadists sent by the
West and the Saudis and Qatar and Turkey.

Your Obama and whoever is behind him or above him are supporting al Qaeda and leading a proxy war on my
country. We thought you are against al Qaeda and now you support them.

The majority here loves Assad. He has never committed a crime against his own peoplethe chemical attack was
staged by the terrorists helped by USA and UK etc..everyone knows that here. American soldiers and people
should not be supporting barbarian al Qaeda terrorists who are killing Christians, Muslims in my country and
everyone.

Every massacre has committed by them. We were all happy in Syria= we have free school and university
education available for everyone, free healthcare, no GMO, no fluoride, no chemtrails, no Rothschild IMF-
controlled bank, state owned central bank which gives 11% interest, we are self-sufficient and have no foreign debt
to any country or bank.

Life before the crisis was so beautiful here. Now it is hard and horrific in some regions.

I do not understand how the good and brave American people can accept to bomb my country who has never
harmed them and therefore help the barbarian al Qaeda . These animals slit throats and behead for pleasure
they behead babies and rape young kids.

They are satanic. Our military helped.by the millions of civilian militias are winning the battle against al Qaeda..but
now the usa want to bomb the shit out of us so the al Qaeda can get the upper hand .

Please help us American people. They are destroying the cradle of civilization. Stop your government.
Impeach that bankster puppet ape you have as president support Ron Paul or Rand or anyone the like who are
true American patriots. but be sure of one.thing.. if they attack and I think they will.it will be hell.

Be sure that it be world war and many many will die. Syria can and will defend itself and will sink many US ships.
Iran will go to war..Russia and China eventually if it escalates and all this for what ? For the elites who created al
Qaeda through the US gvt and use it to conduct proxy wars and destabilize countries who do not go along with
their new world order agenda !!!?!!

American peopleyou gotta regain control of your once admirable country. Now everyone hates you for.the.death
you bring almost everywhere.

Ask the Iraqisthe Afghansthe Pakistanisthe Palestiniansthe Syriansthe Macedonians and Serbsthe
Libyansthe Somalisthe Yemenis .all the ones you kill with drones everyday. Stop your wars stop wars.
Enough wars. Use diplomacy..dialoguehelp..not force.

Consistent testimonies from Syrians, as well as well-documented, open-source Western sources, and historical memory, all
serve to reinforce the accuracy of the aforementioned testimony.

Syrians are living the horror brought to them by the criminal West. They can not afford the complacency of shrugging their
shoulders in indecision, not when their lives and their ancient civilization is being threatened by Western-paid terrorist
mercenaries of the worst kind.

Related: Washingtons Attempted Murder Of Syria

Our proxies, slit throats, chop heads, and take no prisoners as we waffle in indecision, ignore empirical evidence, and take
the comfortable easy road of believing the labyrinth of lies promulgated by Western media messaging.

The veil of comfortable confusion, nested in an unconscious belief that our government knows best or that it is patriotic to
believe the lies and fabrications implicit in the hollow words of politicians (who no longer represent us) and the false
pronouncements of Imperial messengers, is concealing an overseas holocaust.
Western societies are rotting from the inside out because of these lies and this barbarity. We are protecting a criminal cabal
of corporate globalists who do not serve our interests and never will.

Related: US Admits Paying Terrorists For Services Rendered In Syria

Our democracies, which we should be protecting, have long disappeared except in the hollow words of newspaper
stenographers. Instead we are supporting transnational corporate elites and their delusional projects.

Poverty and disemployment are all soaring beneath the fakery of government pronouncements, as the public domain
evaporates beneath words like efficiency or the economy - all false covers that serve to enrich elites and destroy
us. Internal imperialism at home is a faded replica of the foreign imperialism abroad.

As countries are destroyed, and its peoples are slaughtered - think Syria, Libya, Ukraine, and others - by abhorrent Western
proxies - public institutions are contaminated, and ultimately replaced by parasitical privatized facsimiles.

Public banking is looted and destroyed in favour of transnational banksterism, World Bank funding, and IMF usury.

Food security is destroyed and replaced by biotech tentacles and engineered dependencies on cash crops and unhealthy
food. Currencies are destroyed, sanctions are imposed, and the unknown, unseen hand of totalitarian control imposes itself,
amidst the cloud of diversions and confusions, aided by comprador regimes, oligarch interests, and shrugging domestic
populations.

Syria refuses to submit. That is why the West is taught to hate her, and the rest of the world learns to love and respect her.
Related: Liberating Syrias Ancient Pentagram Vortex & Its Geopolitical Effects

Yet, Syrias struggles are our struggles. Syria represents international law, stability, and integrity: the same values that
western peoples overtly cherish but stubbornly reject, as our countries wilt beneath suffocating veils of lies and delusions.

I support Syria, because I respect what remains of international law.

I support Syria because I reject Wahhabism, Sharia law, and terrorism.

I support Syria because I reject the undemocratic, transnational oligarchies that are subverting our once
flourishing, now dead, democracies.

I reject the lies of our propagandizing media, the hollow words of our politicians, and the fake humanitarian messaging
that demonizes non-belligerent countries and their populations.
In the name of justice, humanity, and the rule of law, I support the elected government of Syria led by its President, Bashar
al-Assad. Syria, an ancient cradle of civilization, is leading the way towards a better future for all of us.

All we have to do is open our eyes.

Related: We Know About The Lies Over Iraq But What About Syria?

The Tide Is Turning: The Official Story Is Now The Conspiracy Theory + A Conference
To Clear The Mind Of The 9/11 Brainwashing
September 10 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

Tomorrow it will be the 15th anniversary of 9/11, and this November 22 will be the 53rd anniversary
of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas. These two state crimes against
democracy destroyed American democracy, accountable government, and the Constitutions
protections of civil liberty.
Years after the damage done by these events the American people no longer believe the official stories. Neither
does the government, but the government will never validate the distrust that Americans now share of the
oligarchs government by acknowledging the truth.

Related: Architect Richard Gage On 9/11: TVNZ Close Up

The official explanation of the assassination of President Kennedy never made any sense. Videos of the assassination
contradicted the official story, as did witnesses, and many credible people challenged the governments story.

The CIA was faced with the official explanation becoming unglued and launched its media program stigmatizing doubters as
conspiracy theorists.

Related: Are You A Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge?

The CIAs psych warfare against the public succeeded at the time and for a number of years during which witnesses had
mysterious deaths and the trail grew cold. But by the late 1970s there was so much public skepticism of the official story that
the US Congress took the risk of being labeled conspiracy kooks.

The House Select Committee on Assassinations reopened the inquiry into JFKs murder. The House Committee concluded
that the Warren Commissions investigation was seriously flawed, that there was more than one person firing at President
Kennedy and that there was a conspiracy to assassinate JFK.
Related: Lee Harvey Oswald Innocent

The corrupt US Department of Justice (sic) contradicted the House Select Committees report. However, the American
people believed the Select Committee and not the corrupt Justice (sic) Department, which never tells the truth about
anything.

By 2013 polls showed that most Americans are conspiracy kooks who do not believe the official government line on JFKs
assassination. So with regard to JFKs assassination, the conspiracy theorists are in the majority. The minority are the
Americans who cannot escape their brainwashing.

Related: Poll: 62 percent believe broader plot killed Kennedy

In a few days it will be the 15th anniversary of the alleged al Qaeda attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, and
we are witnessing the fading protection that the charge of conspiracy theorist provides for the officlal government story.
Indeed, the official 9/11 story is collapsing before our eyes.

Europhysics, the respected publicaton of the European physics community has pubished an article by scientists who
conclude that:
The evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three [World Trade Center] buildings were
destroyed by controlled demolition.

Few American scientists can admit this, because their careers depend on US government and military/security complex
research contracts. Independent scientists in the US are a vanishing breed, an endangered species.

The scientists say that in view of their findings, it is morally imperative that 9/11 be the subject of a truly scientific and
impartial investigation by responsible authorities.

Related: 15 Years Later: On The Physics Of High-Rise Building Collapses

So now we are faced with a peculiar situation. The scientifically ignorant two-bit punk American presstitutes claim to know
more than the editors of the journal of the European physics community and the scientists who did the investigation.

Dont you think it farfetched that ignorant, corrupt, and cowardly American journalists who lie for money know
more than physicists, chemists, 2,700 high-rise architects and structural engineers who have called on the US
Congress to launch a real investigation of 9/11, firefighters and first responders who were on the WTC scene,
military and civilian pilots and former high government officials, all of whom are on record challenging the
unbelievable and physically impossible official story of 9/11?

What kind of a dumbshit moron does a person have to be to believe that the United States government and its media
whores know better than the laws of physics?

The ability of the presstitutes to influence Americans seems to be on the decline. The media ganged up on Donald Trump
during the Republican primaries, intending to deny Trump the nomination.

But the voters ignored the presstitutes. In the current presidential campaign, Hillary is not the run-away winner that the
presstitutes are trying to make her. And despite the propaganda ministry, the legs under the official 9/11 story are wobbly, to
say the least.
Indeed, the official 9/11 story already has lost credibility with the American public. Last April a Rasmussen Poll found that
Americans doubt theyve been told all the facts about the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States and
strongly believe the government should come clean.

Related: Americans Want Government To Tell All About 9/11

A YouGov poll in 2013 found that 50 percent of Americans have doubts about the governments account of 9/11, which
shows that the public is far more intelligent and less corrupt than the presstitutes who are paid to lie to the public.

This poll also found that as a consequence of the cover-up job performed by the American presstitutes, 46 percent of
Americans were not even aware that a third WTC building, Building 7, collapsed on September 11. After viewing films of
WTC 7s collapse, 46 percent saw it as a controlled demolition.

By a margin of two to one, poll respondants support a new investigation of Building 7s collapse.

So, in America today conspiracy kooks outnumber those who believe the official lies.
As the official lies are themselves conspiracy theories, Americans who disbelieve the official conspiracy theories outnumber
Americans who believe official conspiracy theories.

The question is: who are the real conspiracy kooks, the majority who disbelieve the official lies or the minority who
believe the official lies?

It is curious that the CIAs psych-op mind-controll has broken down in the cases of the JFK assassination and 9/11, but is
still effective in more recently orchestrated events, such as San Bernardino, Orlando, Paris, and Nice. Perhaps this is
because not enough time has passed for the public to pay attention to the vast difference between the stories and the
evidence.

The Internet offers many refutations of the official accounts. With regard to Nice, France, the Nice police officials themselves
are having problems with the official story. The French Anti-Terrorist Sub-Directorate in Paris has ordered the public
authorities in Nice to delete the video recordings from security cameras of the Nice Terror Truck Attack. The Nice
authorities refused on the grounds that this would be destruction of criminal evidence.

Related: French Anti-Terrorist Police Demand Destruction Of Nice Evidence

This story has disappeared from the news. I have asked friends in France how this conflict was resolved and have not heard
anything. The French like to live life well and faced with the refugees from Washingtons wars, they seem to be focused on
living life well while it can be done. If I hear anything, I will pass it on.

Apparently, the order to delete the video evidence of the attack was not sufficient for the French Ministry of the Interior.
According to a senior Nice police officer, Sandra Bertin, the Interior Ministry pressured her to falsify her police report on the
Nice truck massacre.

Officer Bertin told the Journal du Dimanche that he ordered me to put in [the report] the specific positions of the national
police which I had not seen on the screen.
Related: French officer claims interior ministry made her alter Nice attack report

The Interior Minister, Bernard Cazeneuve is suing the Nice police official for defamation, as if it is possible to defame any
politician anywhere in the corrupt West.

Related: French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve To Sue Police Officer Over Nice Attack Claims

Moreover, why would a senior Nice official make up a story about being ordered to change a report? It doesnt make any
sense, does it? Clearly, the central government is trying to hide the evidence against the official story.

Related: French government denies cover-up of Nice police deployment

It seems that the French media is disposing of the Nice police official by branding her a rightwing racist opposed to the
current government.

Related: Nice attack CCTV manipulation controversy a new blow to French govt

How the "Nice Truck Attack Hoax" was Orchestrated

Watch this video and ignore the narrators four-letter vocabulary.

What you will learn is that all those people you saw running in the presstitute TV reports had no idea why they were
running. The presstitutes created the impression that they were running away from the truck.

However, as the interviews show, they were running because other people were running, because the police told them
terrorists, run, and because they heard shots (apparently police firing blanks). Those interviewed reported;

You run with them even though you have no idea what you are running from. You cant help it, you run with them.
None of those running away ever saw a truck.

According to the foul-mouthed narrator, the film of the people running away was taken prior to the time the truck allegedly
mowed down 185 people, killing 85 of them.

The narrator appears to be correct if the time stamps on videos are correct. The narrator says the streets needed to be
cleared for the crisis actors to put on their show that is used to control our minds about what happened.

I have pointed out that a truck that hit 185 people, killing 85 of them would be covered in blood and that bodies would be
splattered all over the street with blood everywhere. Yet, the photos and videos that we are shown show no such evidence.
The stopped truck on which police are directing gunfire is as white as snow.

Independently of the vast analysis online of the video evidence of the alleged Nice attack, I suspect the Nice terror
attack for the same reason that the Pentagon attack is suspect.

Despite all the contrary evidence against the official stories, the authorities refuse to release the video evidence that, if it
shows what the authorities claim, would shut up the skeptics and prove the official story.

When a government claims it has video evidence that proves its official story but refuses to release it, indeed, demands the
destruction of the video evidence, we know for an absolute fact that the video evidence totally contradicts the official story.
That is the only possible conclusion.

My readers will write to me asking how the government expects to get away with its faked, and in the case of 9/11 false flag,
terror orchestrations?
The answer, perhaps, is that just as it took a long time for the JFK assassination and 9/11 lies to catch up with the
government, the recent orchestrations will also take some time for a slowly awakening public to catch on.

In the meantime the orchestrated events will serve the agendas that they are intended to serve, and by the time that the
public sees through the orchestrations, a new situation will be in place with new orchestrations.

Keep in mind that the public thinks it is shown evidence.

Newspapers need photos to give a visual dimension to their coverage, and TV needs videos of the events. News
organizations are under a time pressure, and they have to use what they are handed or what is at hand. There is no time to
scrutinize the visual material or to raise questions about it.

Most of the public thinks that the photos and videos shown to them are evidence or would not be shown and accepts the
visual evidence without question. In an earlier column I linked to the vast array of Nice photos provided in the UK Daily Mail.
The photos show a calm situation.
There are a few people lying in the street without any sign of bodily damage or blood and there are covered objects that the
public assumes are dead people. But the streets are devoid of the splattered blood and mangled bodies that would be the
consequence of a truck hitting 185 people.

Similarly, we have been shown very few videos and their origin is unknown except for the one attributed to Richard Gutjahr
who was apparently pre-positioned to film inconclusively both the Nice and German terror attacks.

Online analysis of the videos shows that the videos are not evidence for the storyline. The real question is why the
French Interior Minister has prevented the release and demanded destruction of the security camera videos that
filmed the entire event, an order that brought the central government in Paris in conflict with the public authorities
in Nice.

There has been no US media interest whatsoever in this very strange event. It is not a conspiracy theory to ask why the
public cannot see the video evidence that shows what actually happened.

Related: Frances Minister of the Interior Is Withholding All Security Camera Evidence of the Nice Truck Massacre
and Demands that the Evidence be Destroyed
Related: Weapon Used in November 13 Paris Attacks Came From CIA-linked Arms Dealer

What agenda is served by the Paris and Nice attacks? This is the question everyone should be asking and the media, if we
had one, should be investigating. With the information currently available to me, my answer is this. Of all the peoples of
Western Europe, the French are the most independently minded. French independence has taken a number of recent hits
from Washington:

The largest French bank was forced to hand over $9 billion to Washington for doing business with a country on
Washingtons disapproval list.

Washington forced France to cancel a lucrative ship-building program for Russia, to the detriment of French companies and
shipyard workers.

Related: France Moves To Strip Citizens Of Civil Liberties After Paris Attacks

Washington has forced France into a diplomatic conflict with Russia that the French do not want and into a looming military
conflict which the French want even less, as the conflict would mean the vaporization of France. As one Russian SS-18 can
wipe out three-fourths of the state of New York, how many do you think it would take to wipe France off of the face of the
Earth? Not even a handful.

Keep in mind that in 1966 President Charles de Gaulle pulled France out of NATO on the grounds that it was necessary to
preserve French independence in world affairs. France did not again submit to Washingtons control until 2009 when
Washington-owned Nicolas Sarkozy, put into the French presidency by Washingtons money, followed his orders and
rejoined NATO.
The Paris and Nice orchestrated events serve to scare France back into Washingtons arms. Dreams of independence
become nightmares when independence leaves the French people at the mercy of both terrorists and Russians.
Washington, who owns Sarkozy, who is once again Washingtons candidate for president of France, intends to keep France
in NATO.

The article in Europhysics pointing out the impossibility of the official 9/11 story could possibly lead to a rebirth of skepticism
among Europeans. Only a skeptical media willing to investigate government storylines can bring a halt to the staged terror
events that serve secret agendas.

Keep in mind that the US government has plentiful video evidence of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon but refuses to
release the evidence that it says support its story.

Similarly, the French federal government has prohibited Nice authorities from releasing the security camera videos of the
Nice truck attack and has ordered the video evidence destroyed. How can we believe governments that refuse to show us
the hard evidence?

Related: A Brief 100 Year History Of 9/11 And The Jekyll Island Banks

A Conference To Clear The Mind Of The 9/11 Brainwashing

If any of my readers are still brainwashed about 9/11, they need to attend this conference. Tickets
are still available.
A 2-Day Symposium | Sept. 10-11, 2016 | Cooper Union New York City

Fifteen years after the events of 9/11, wars and cultural conflicts caused by the U.S. response and questionable alliances
continue to create global tensions. Furthermore, questions of how the attacks took place continue to surface. For these
reasons, a historic event highlighting the blatant discrepancies of the official narrative will be held to critique science-based
evidence of the most consequential event of our time.

A stellar lineup of credentialed experts will also review new evidence of a cover up such as is revealed in the declassification
of the 28 pages, and raise the bar literally, with an unprecedented level of legal analysis. As youll see, this event has an
international component, since 9/11 was such a world-changing event. Full details and tickets are
at www.911justiceinfocus.org.

The Day 1 Program will feature:

Keynote address by renowned public interest attorney, Daniel Sheehan, who litigated the Pentagon Papers case, the
Karen Silkwood case, Iran/Contra scandal, and Three Mile Island.

Keynote address by Judge Ferdinand Imposimato, head of the Supreme Court of Italy, with experience prosecuting
conspiratorial crimes, notably Operation Gladio.

Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth, which currently has over 2,600 professionals from
the building trades as signatories
.
Professor Leroy Hulsey, from the University of Alaska, who is conducting a unique, unbiased, independent modeling of the
collapse of WTC 7.

Unique analysis of ISIS, the latest on the secret 28 pages and related legislation which has begun to reveal the official
deceptions and questionable geopolitical alliances to the widest audience ever reached in this 15-year effort.
The 9/11 Truth Action Project the next level of national organizing.

Speakers include:

Government whistleblowers Wayne Madsen, former NSA analyst, and J. Michael Springmann, former State Department
foreign services officer.

TV news personality, media critic, and attorney known as Lionel.

Bob McIlvaine, 9/11 family member.

Dylan Avery, creator of the globally renown 9/11 documentary Loose Change.

Master of Ceremony will be Mark Crispin Miller, professor of Media, Culture and Communication at New York University.

For the Day 2 Program there will be a sequence of legal presentations analyzing key strategies and many yet-
unaddressed evidentiary issues. These include:

Presentation of Legal Standards and Key Evidence.

9/11 Related Litigation to Date.

Pending and Planned FOIA Requests, Appeals, and Litigation.

Future U.S. Litigation Options.

Potential for an International Investigation.

Speakers include:

Public interest attorney , Daniel Sheehan.

Judge Ferdinand Imposimato, Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy.

Mick Harrison, whistleblower litigation expert.

William Veale and Mustapha Ndanusa, attorneys for April Gallop, Pentagon survivor.

David Meiswinkle, New Jersey litigator and former police officer.

Barbara Honegger, State Department whistleblower, author of October Surprise.

Andrew Kreig, journalist and attorney.

Engineers David Chandler, Jonathan Cole, Tony Szamboti.

Architect Richard Gage, AIA.

Master of Ceremony will be Dr. William Pepper, international civil rights attorney, litigator for the family of Martin Luther
King, and author of Act of State.

Why should you attend this powerful event? Since justice and rule of law is the foundation of any civilized society, the
commitment to face all the facts of 9/11 will empower us as a culture to move forward and re-establish our position of trust
and integrity in the world. In so many ways, our future depends on it. Make plans today.

Sept. 10 & 11, 2015 | 10am 6:30pm | Cooper Union,


7 East 7th Street, Manhattan
(7th St. and 3rd Avenue)

For more details and tickets: www.911justiceinfocus.org


Are You A Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge? + The Term Conspiracy Theory Was
Invented By The CIA In Order To Prevent Disbelief Of Official Government Stories
September 2 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

Do you smirk when you hear someone question the official stories of Orlando, San Bernardino,
Paris or Nice? Do you feel superior to 2,500 architects and engineers, to firefighters, commercial
and military pilots, physicists and chemists, and former high government officials who have raised
doubts about 9/11?

If so, you reflect the profile of a mind-controlled CIA stooge.

The term conspiracy theory was invented and put into public discourse by the CIA in 1964 in order to discredit the many
skeptics who challenged the Warren Commissions conclusion that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by a lone
gunman named Lee Harvey Oswald, who himself was assassinated while in police custody before he could be questioned.

The CIA used its friends in the media to launch a campaign to make suspicion of the Warren Commission report a target of
ridicule and hostility. This campaign was one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.

So writes political science professor Lance deHaven-Smith, who in his peer-reviewed book, Conspiracy Theory in
America, published by the University of Texas Press, tells the story of how the CIA succeeded in creating in the
public mind reflexive, automatic, stigmatization of those who challenge government explanations.

This is an extremely important and readable book, one of those rare books with the power to break you out of The Matrix.

Professor deHaven-Smith is able to write this book because the original CIA Dispatch #1035-960, which sets out the CIA
plot, was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. Apparently, the bureaucracy did not regard a document
this old as being of any importance.

The document is marked Destroy when no longer needed, but somehow wasnt. CIA Dispatch #1035-960 is reproduced in
the book.
The success that the CIA has had in stigmatizing skepticism of government explanations has made it difficult to investigate
State Crimes Against Democracy (SCAD) such as 9/11.

With the public mind programmed to ridicule conspiracy kooks, even in the case of suspicious events such as 9/11 the
government can destroy evidence, ignore prescribed procedures, delay an investigation, and then form a political committee
to put its imprimatur on the official story.

Professor deHaven-Smith notes that in such events as Kennedys assassination and 9/11 official police and
prosecutorial investigations are never employed. The event is handed off to a political commission.

Professor deHaven-Smiths book supports what I have told my readers: the government controls the story from the
beginning by having the official explanation ready the moment a SCAD occurs. This makes any other explanation a
conspiracy theory. This is the way Professor deHaven-Smith puts it:

A SCAD approach to memes assumes further that the CIA and other possibly participating agencies are
formulating memes well in advance of operations, and therefore SCAD memes appear and are popularized very
quickly before any competing concepts are on the scene.

The CIAs success in controlling public perception of what our Founding Fathers would have regarded as suspicious events
involving the government enables those in power positions within government to orchestrate events that serve hidden
agendas.

The events of September 11 created the new paradigm of endless war in behalf of a Washington-dominated world. The
CIAs success in controlling public perceptions has made it impossible to investigate elite political crimes. Consequently, it is
now possible for treason to be official US government policy.
Professor deHaven-Smiths book will tell you the story of the assassination of President Kennedy by elements of the US
military, CIA, and Secret Service. Just as the Warren Commission covered up the State Crime Against Democracy,
Professor deHaven-Smith shows why we should doubt the official 9/11 story. And anything else that the government tells us.

Read this book. It is short. It is affordable. It is reality preparation. It will innoculate you against being a dumbshit, insouciant,
brainwashed American. I am surprised that the CIA has not purchased the entire print run and burned the books.

Perhaps the CIA feels secure from its success in brainwashing the public and does not believe that American democracy
and accountable government can be restored.

The Term Conspiracy Theory Was Invented By The CIA In Order To Prevent Disbelief
Of Official Government Stories
The Term Conspiracy Theory Was Invented by the CIA In Order To Prevent Disbelief of Official
Government Stories
Ron Unz reports on the cold shoulder given to an extensively researched book that concludes that World War II
hero General George Patton was murdered by the CIA because he became a powerful critic of Washington.

The book was ignored because the US media and public have been programmed to regard the US government as a truth-
teller and those who expose government crimes as conspiracy theorists.

In 2013 Professor Lance Dehaven-Smith in a peer-reviewed book published by the University of Texas Press showed that
the term conspiracy theory was developed by the CIA as a means of undercutting critics of the Warren Commissions
report that President Kennedy was killed by Oswald. The use of this term was heavily promoted in the media by the CIA.

See: Conspiracy Theory in America (Discovering America)

It is ironic that the American left is a major enforcer of the CIAs strategy to shut up skeptics by branding them conspiracy
theorists.

The Truth Of ISIS Exposed In Four Minutes + Leaders On Both Sides Have Already
Exposed The Truth - Where Is The Mainstream Media On This?
August 24 2016 | From: GlobalResearch / AustralianNationalReview / Geopolitics / Various

They never attack Israel. The evidence that ISIS is a Zionist creation of the cabal that runs the US
(and the Western allies) and Israel (using radical Islam as a scapegoat) is overwhelming - And
here's a data dump.
British Labor Leader Corbyn: ISIS Created by UK and US: British Labor leader Jeremy Corbyn has risked
sparking fresh controversy after blaming the rise of ISIS on Britain and the United States.

Related: Tracking ISIS to DCs Doorsteps

The veteran anti-war campaigner said ISIS hadnt come from nowhere and was partly a creation of Western interventions
in the region.

The Truth Of ISIS Exposed In Four Minutes

Related: British government IPs found linked to ISIS Twitter accounts

Corbyn, 66, said attacking the fanatical group would only make things worse and instead claimed Britain would be safer it if
declared that it supported the diversity of faith and diversity of aspirations around the world.

Corbyn was roundly condemned on for refusing to sing the national anthem at a memorial to Battle of Britain heroes. The
veteran socialist, speaking to the obscure website Middle East Eye, said Labor needed to stick to its principles and vowed
to stay on as Labor leader for the next five years.

But he risks a major rebellion over a proposed vote on extending the military action against ISIS into Syria.

In 2013 Cameron was left humiliated after MPs including Corbyn rejected airstrikes. Speaking in 2015, Corbyn said he
would not change his position.

Corbyn said:
"ISIS did not come from nowhere. They have got a lot of money thats come from somewhere. Theyve got a huge
supply of arms that have come from somewhere. They are not in total, but in part a creation of Western
interventions in the region.

What I would do is try to economically isolate them. And also try to unite the other groups in the region by
supporting autonomy for the Kurdish groups and recognize the vast amount of arms that we have sold
particularly to Saudi Arabia end up somewhere and those are now being used.

Bombing by the West in Syria now would create more mayhem. Its very unclear who the alliances would be with
and it would make the situation worse. I opposed the bombing of Syria in that historic 2013 vote and would
continue that position."

Despite his position Corbyn insisted he would keep Britain safe. He said:

"We make ourselves safer by not being part of US foreign policy at every single turn. We make ourselves safer by
saying we understand the diversity of faith and diversity of aspirations around the world. And also by becoming a
force for human rights rather than military interventions around the world. I think that would make us safer.

Corbyn has previously sparked fury by comparing ISIS brutality to US military action in Iraq; Daily Mail reported.

Related: Israeli Colonel Caught with IS Pants Down

ISIS Leader Admits to Being Funded by the US


In early 2015, Yousaf al Salafi, a man believed to be the Pakistani commander of the Islamic State,
confessed during investigations that he has been receiving money through the United States.

"Captured" US military hardware


A few months after al Salafi revealed the funding he was receiving was routed through the United States, Michael
Flynn, former director of Obamas Defence Intelligence Agency, said he warned the Obama administration three
years ago that the groups they were funding in Syria were actually Islamic jihadists.

Related: Guess Who is Behind the Islamic State: Israeli IDF Colonel Leading ISIS Terrorists Arrested in Iraq

Now, a group of 50 intelligence analysts working out of the U.S. militarys Central Command have complained that their
reports on Islamic State and the Syrian branch of Al-Qaeda were being incorrectly changed by senior officials.

On January 22, law enforcing agencies in Pakistan claimed they arrested not only al Salafi, but also two other people during
a raid in the city of Lahore. A source familiar with the investigation told Daily Express that during the investigation al Salafi
admitted he received funding to run the organisation in Pakistan and recruit young people to fight in Syria.

The Pakistani-Syrian entered Pakistan via Turkey last year, but it was previously reported that he crossed into Turkey from
Syria, was caught there but managed to escape and went to Pakistan to establish ISIS in the region.

Daily Express cited sources as saying that John Kerry, the U.S. Secretary of State was familiar with al Salafis revelations
and so was CENTCOM chief General Lloyd Austin. Al Salafi confessed he was recruiting people with a Pakistani
accomplice to send them to Syria and was receiving around US$600 per person.

ISIS was created by the CIA and Mossad

A recently declassified 2012 document shows that Salafist, the Muslim Brotherhood and AQI [Al-Qaeda in Iraq] were listed
as the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria. The document also revealed that the West, Gulf countries and Turkey
support the opposition while Russia, China and Iran support the regime.

According to the declassified document, the Obama administration was warned in 2012 that these Islamic jihadists wanted
to create a:

"Salafist principality in eastern Syria and that ISI [Islamic State of Iraq] could declare an Islamic State through its
union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, which will create grave danger in regards to unifying Iraq
and the protection of its territory.

Now, over 50 intelligence analysts have formally claimed their reports on Islamic State and al-Qaedas branch in Syria were
altered by senior officials, The Daily Beast reported. An investigation into the alleged manipulation of intelligence has been
opened.
More "Captured" US military hardware

A couple of months ago, two senior analysts at CENTCOM claimed in a written complaint to the Defence Department
inspector general that the reports described the terror groups as weaker than they believe they are.

The reports, some of which were briefed to the U.S. president, were altered by CENTCOM senior officials to make sure it
adheres to the presidential administrations public line that the United States is winning the fight against Islamic State and an
al-Qaeda branch in Syria named al-Nusra, the analysts told the publication. The written complaint was supported by 50
other intelligence analysts.

In recent months, members of the Obama administration have tried to convince the population that the fight against ISIS
may soon be over. ISIS is losing, John Allen, retired Marine general charged with coordinating the Islamic State campaign
said in July.

Related: Reality Check: Proof U.S. Government Wanted ISIS To Emerge In Syria

We Fabricated ISIS CIA Contractor


Former CIA contractor Steven Kelley has said on record that ISIS/ISIL are a fabricated terrorist
group made and funded by the CIA in the United States.
According to the video description: This is a completely fabricated enemy, he said in a phone interview with
Press TV from Anaheim, California on Thursday.

Related: Twenty-six Things About the Islamic State (ISIS) that Obama Does Not Want You to Know About

"The funding is completely from the United States and its allies and for people to think that this enemy is something
that needs to be attacked in Syria or Iraq is a farce because obviously this is something that we created, we control
and only now it has become inconvenient for us to attack this group as a legitimate enemy, Kelley added.

He made the remarks as US President Barack Obama is under pressure to seek congressional approval before expanding
Washingtons military air campaign against ISIL targets from Iraq into neighboring Syria.

The Pentagon has already launched at least 100 airstrikes on ISIL positions in northern Iraq since Obama authorized the
use of force against the terrorist group earlier this month.
The White House insists it does not need explicit congressional authorization for those operations because they are
intended to protect American personnel and interests inside the Arab country.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Monday that Obama will not hesitate to use his authority to keep
Americans safe, but added that the president was committed to coordinating and consulting with Congress on a decision to
hit ISIL targets in Syria.

If you want to get to the root of the problem and remove this organization, the first thing they need to do is to
remove the funding and take care of entities responsible for the creation of this group, Kelley said.

I believe that this ISIS group would probably go away, would be easily defeated by the armies of [Syrian
President] Bashar Assad, he said.

ISIS fabricated by US!: Former CIA contractor

Related: Delivery of US Weapons and Ammunition to ISIS: Iraqi Commander Wiretaps ISIS Communications with
US Military
Everything the West has done was to create ISIS - John Pilger

Related Articles:

Shock Report: Pentagon Defies Obamas Policy of Arming ISIS Jihadists

Everything the West has done was to create ISIS John Pilger

Breaking Bullcrap - Episode 1: ISIS Islamic State Worldwide Deception Exposed

Rouhani calls on Muslims to correct image of Islam worldwide

Bombshell! Norway Confirms ISIS Oil Sold into Turkey at Low Prices

Why is a Hate Campaign being Waged against Muslims?

Israel is the Main Purchaser of ISIS Oil

ISIS vows to destroy New Zealand and other enemies in new propaganda video

How Turkey Exports ISIS Oil To The World: The Scientific Evidence

Humanitarian Supplies for the Islamic State (ISIS): NATOs Terror Convoys Halted at Syrian Border

The Unexpected Explanation How "That Ford Truck" Ended Up In ISIS Hands

Israeli military showcases 3-year-long medical support operations for Islamic State terrorists

Saving their sworn enemy: Heartstopping footage shows Israeli commandos rescuing wounded men from Syrian
warzone - but WHY are they risking their lives for Islamic militants?

The Boy In The Ambulance: US State Dept-Funded Groups Behind Latest 'Iconic
Image' Designed To Demonize Russia And Encourage Further Bloodshed In Syria
August 21 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

Washingtons media presstitutes are using the image of the child to bring pressure on Russia to
stop the Syrian army from retaking Alleppo.
Washington wants its so-called moderate rebels to retain Alleppo so that Washington can split Syria in two,
thereby keeping a permanent pressure against President Assad. [See CNN propaganda here]

Related: The Aleppo Poster Child

As for the little boy in the propaganda picture, he does not seem to be badly injured. Let us not forget the tens of thousands
of children that Washingtons wars and bombings of 7 Muslim countries have killed without any tears shed by CNN anchors,
and let us not forget the 500,000 Iraqi children that the United Nations concluded died as a result of US sanctions against
Iraq, childrens deaths that Clintons Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said were worth it.

Related: Exposed - Iraq War Was A Lie: The Invasion Of Iraq Took Place Under False Pretences

Let us not forget that Washingtons determination to overthrow the Syrian government has brought many deaths to Syrians
of all age groups. Washington alone is responsible for the deaths.

The evil Obama regime has stated over and over that Assad must go and is prepared to destroy the country and much of
the population in order to get rid of him.

According to the Obama regime, Assad must go because he is a dictator.

Washington tells this lie despite the fact that Assad was elected and re-elected and has far higher support among Syrians
that Obama has among Americans.

Moreover, whatever Washington accuses Assad of doing to Syrians is nothing compared to the death and destruction that
Washington brought to Syria.

Perhaps the tragedy of Aleppo could have been avoided if the Russian government had not prematurely declared mission
accomplished in Syria and withdrawn only to have to rush back after the Russian government was again deceived by
Washington.

Message From Iraqi Children To America And The World


Related: Message From Iraqi Children To America And The World + Israeli IDF Colonel Leading ISIS Terrorists
Arrested in Iraq

Banker John Keys Corporate Repackaging Of War


August 15 2016 | From: EnviroWatchRangitikei

With the upcoming celebrations around the 2016 NZ DIA (NZ Defense Industry Association) Forum
being held in Auckland on 16 - 17 November in conjunction with the RNZN 75th Anniversary
celebrations, Operation Neptune, I took a peek at their website.

You can reserve your sponsorship spot with cocktails and trimmings for just $10,000.

Related: NZ Defence Force To Get $20bn Upgrade + More To Planned US Warship Visit Than Mere Celebration

This is an issue which has been raised on numerous occasions with progressive organizations and WSF activists: you cannot
effectively confront neoliberalism and the New World Order elites and expect them to finance your activities.
The NZ DIA was formed in 1993, as an industry development initiative. Its major emphasis today is on networking,
and encouraging the membership to work together on developing joint approaches to defence projects in NZ and
overseas

Right there in the DIAs mission statement is the strategic use of the word defence. The corporate bankers have need of
war, its an integral part of the Rothschild banking empire, however, in order to not be too obvious, they need to sanitize it with
nicer words.

Profiteering from war is no conspiracy but documented fact.

Related: All Wars Are Bankers' Wars

Cheneys Halliburton made $39.5 billion on the Iraq war. My elderly father who fought in one of the World Wars and was
fortunate enough to return alive, had worked out that fact later in life that wars would never end because wars make
money. His oldest brother, a machine gunner, so deeply affected, he wept whenever he talked about war.
So, there on the DIAs website is the standard tribute of poppies to these brave men who served as basically cannon fodder
for the war machine, a machine peopled by those who never spent one minute in trenches and never experienced the terror
of combat.

Remember Mrs Rothschilds infamous words if my sons did not want war there would be none.

Returning to the planned forum for November this year, Keys corporation parading as a government (NZ is a US SEC
registered corporation) put out a White Paper that was compiled we are told from the publics and the academic communitys
views, involving over 300 written submissions and meetings around the country. (See White Paper info here also).
Related: New Zealands Homegrown Military-Industrial Complex

I dont particularly recall the road show, perhaps other readers do. Note the Ministry of Defence administers the Defence Act
1990, the era shortly after our nation became corporatized courtesy of Rogernomics.

Corporations are about profits. We are told in the White Paper that terrorism remains an enduring global problem.

Those who do their own research will know that the so called war on terror has been effectively drummed up since the very
dodgy 9/11 attack that looked extremely like a controlled demolition.

And the current threat to security, ISIS, has equally dodgy


origins (watch Truth Media: the Origin of ISIS for more info on
that).

The war industry is ticking along quite nicely in Aotearoa with


banker Key at the helm, and synchronising equally as nicely with
his growing partnership with the US.

"The Government[corporation] says Key, has provided


the Defence Force with a degree of funding
certainty [$20 billion] that enables it to plan with
confidence out to 2030 and beyond.

[Agenda 2030, see also Agenda 21/2030 in NZ] Download the White Paper and see what Key and Brownlee are spending
your $20 billion on.

Remember how well theyve managed the Christchurch disaster that they refer to in there. Its an integral part of defence.

The interdependence of planned global governance under Agenda 21/2030, already operative in both your Government and your Local Government

What I find particularly distasteful about this whole affair is the spin. One of my favourite investigative journalists John Pilger,
describes their convoluted rhetoric so well in his essay, Arming the World (in his book Hidden Agendas p 115). Describing
the weapons (defence) industry he says:
Refined absurdity is always close at hand in the arms business. It squeezes into bed with secrecy, corruption and
stupendous greed.

Asking what a British cluster bomb does (gleaming under soft backlight, like the latest showroom Jaguar) he is told they
need his request in writing for MOD approval as the information is classified, the reason for which is also classified.

The cluster bomb, Pilger explains:

Is not really a bomb at all, but an area denial sub-munition, a land mine in all but name. It is dropped from the air
and explodes into forty-seven little mines, which are shaped like spiders."

These are scattered over a wide area and deny life to anything that moves or grows. Theyve been found says Pilger, in
Bosnia and Croatia where between two and four million mines threaten to main and kill long after the war ends.

These salesmen he says, have great difficulty saying words like people, maim and kill. Describing a cluster
bombs effectiveness he cites the little girl who in a Vietnam village lost her family

My mother and father were lying there covered in blood, and my sister had pieces of metal in her, and so did
her doll.

The corporates know it is wrong, trading in weapons (theyre not averse to supplying both sides), this is why they have
difficulty with these words.

There is enough of old fashioned conscience there for them to need to cover their wording well, however not enough to stop
the killing by curtailing their obscene greed.
They are therefore very adept at reframing and repackaging. And so the weapons trade becomes the defence trade.

Now if you have any doubt still about the money involved here, check out the these two exmples of sponsorhip pages for the
upcoming conference. Corporate sponsorship of cocktails and food depending on your budget:

However, if youre a bit strapped for cash, theres always the $5,000 slot minus cocktails and food.
A list of members of the NZ DIA can be seen here. You will see Fulton Hogan (that company that liberally sprays your streets
and public places with carcinogenic glyphosate) along with Lockheed Martin and others. All proudly members of the Defence /
Industry partnership.

And to put the proverbial icing on the cake, there are even awards for improvement to defence industry relationships.

The Award will identify the Defence person or persons who have best contributed to building or improving the
Defence / Industry relationship.

The aim of the Award is to publicly recognise good performance in this area and provide the opportunity for the NZ
DIA and Defence to promote constructive and collegial relationships between Defence and Industry."

Your PM Key continues to tax himself and friends at 2.8%, continues to profit from your countrys indebtedness and the so
called global war on terrorism, and is intent on the TPPA agreement which will give both he and his corporate friends even
more control. Lets face it, he is likely not too interested in changing any of the current status quo.

Related: Banker Key is Quietly Oiling the US War Machine

Related: UK Minister Holds Top-Level Defence Talks In Wellington + John Key Called Out
Trump Is Right: Proof Hillary & Obama Founded ISIS & Obama Admits Were Training
ISIL + Hillarys Medical Records Revealed -This Is What Shes Hiding
August 14 2016 | From: Infowars / Infowars / JoeForAmerica / Various

Hillary even admitted U.S. created al-Qaeda, the precursor of ISIS.

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are founding members of ISIS by bankrolling, arming and supporting jihadists in
Syria and Libya to both destabilize the Middle East and expand the domestic police state.

Related: 2012 Pentagon report warned Obama was creating ISIS

Clinton even even admitted in 2009 that the U.S. government staffed with many of her closest allies was responsible for
al-Qaeda, which morphed into ISIS.

I mean, lets remember here: The people we are fighting today we funded 20 years ago, and we did it because we were
locked in this struggle with the Soviet Union, she said.

Clinton continued:

They invaded Afghanistan, and we did not want to see them control central Asia, and we went to work, and it was
President Reagan, in partnership with the Congress, led by Democrats, who said, You know what? Sounds like a
pretty good idea!

Lets deal with the ISI and the Pakistani military, and lets go recruit these Mujahedin! Thats great! Lets get some
to come from Saudi Arabia and other places, importing their Wahhabi brand of Islam, so that we can go beat the
Soviet Union!

And guess what? They retreated, they lost billions of dollars, and it led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. So
theres a very strong argument, which is: It wasnt a bad investment to end the Soviet Union, but lets be careful
what we sow, because we will harvest.

Shes right: al-Qaeda was created by Western intelligence and has always been under the influence of the West, starting
with al-Qaedas precursor, the Mujahideen of Afghanistan.

In 1979 the Mujahideen was Americas secret weapon in Operation Cyclone, the CIA project to arm and finance Jihadi
warriors in a proxy war against the USSR.

It was geopolitical strategist and Clinton ally Zbigniew Brzezinski, then National Security Advisor under President Jimmy
Carter, who used the Mujahideen to draw the Soviet Union into an unwinnable war in Afghanistan.

To aid in this endeavor, U.S. intelligence picked a mujaheddin fighter named Osama bin Laden to lead the Afghan
resistance against the USSR and gave him the codename Tim Osman.
He was chosen primary because his wealthy family was connected to the Bush family as a long-term business partner in the
West.

The CIA also paid Osama to operate a charity front called the Maktab al-Khidamat (also known as the as Al-Kifah) which
funneled recruits and money to the Mujahideen, and the US government later said MAK was the precursor organization to
al-Qaeda.
And a few decades later, in 2012, Clintons State Dept. was backing al-Qaeda in Iraq, which morphed into ISIS, and other
Islamic extremist groups as a proxy army to topple Syrian President Bashir al-Assad, a close ally to Russia and an enemy to
Saudi Arabia, an Obama administration ally.

The Salafist [sic], the Muslim Brotherhood and AQI [al-Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria,
a leaked memo between her State Dept. and the Pentagon stated. The West, Gulf countries, and Turkey support [this]
opposition, while Russia, China and Iran support the [Assad] regime.

This secret document confirms that Clintons State Dept. and the Obama administration in general was directly
responsible for the rise of ISIS.

The former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, confirmed the documents
importance.

Former DIA Director Admits Obama Created ISIS:

I dont know that [the Obama administration] turned a blind eye [to ISIS], I think it was a decision; I think it was a
willful decision, he said.

The document likely stemmed from a discussion during the 2012 Bilderberg conference held in Chantilly, Virginia, in which
participants envisioned a Syrian puppet government taking orders from the U.S. State Department, the European Union and
NATO.
A couple years later, in 2014 a $1.1 trillion federal spending bill rammed through Congress provided a half-billion dollars to
arm and train ISIS-linked Syrian rebels.

The spending bill authorized the Secretary of Defense $500,000,000 to equip appropriately vetted elements of the Syrian
opposition who will defend the Syrian people from attacks by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, but a few months
before, ISIS signed a truce with the remaining rebel groups and they began working together against the Syrian
government.

That, however, didnt stop Obama; on Oct. 1, 2015, he authorized a shipment of guns to ISIS-linked militants in Syria.

The approval came at a National Security Council meeting on Thursday, CNN reported at the time. The
President also emphasized to his team that the U.S. would continue to support the Syrian opposition as Russia
enters the war-torn country.

Once again, it should be emphasized that the so-called Syrian rebels were either ISIS militants or allied with ISIS.

We are collaborating with the Islamic State and the Nusra Front by attacking the Syrian Armys gatherings in
Qalamoun [in Syria], Bassel Idriss, the commander of a Free Syrian Army rebel brigade, told the Lebanese Daily
Star in 2014. ISIS wanted to enhance its presence in the Western Qalamoun area.

After the fall of Yabroud and the FSAs retreat into the hills, many units pledged allegiance to ISIS.

Another rebel, Abu Ahmed, also said his unit was willing to collaborate with ISIS and its affiliates.

Fighters feel proud to join al-Nusra [an ISIS affiliate] because that means power and influence, he told the
Guardian.
In fact, at least 29 different Syrian rebel groups had pledged allegiance to the al-Nusra Front.

Clinton even admitted to BBC that these Syrian rebels serving the administrations interests in Syria are terrorists.

We have a very dangerous set of actors in the region, Al-Qaeda, Hamas, and those who are on our terrorist list, to
be sure, supporting claiming to support the opposition in Syria, she said.

But that didnt stop the Obama administration from saving ISIS militants from U.S. airstrikes by giving them a 45-
minute warning prior to an airstrike on their oil tankers.

Get out of your trucks now, and run away from them. Warning: air strikes are coming. Oil trucks will be destroyed.
Get away from your oil trucks immediately. Do not risk your life, the warning leaflets given to ISIS read.

U.S. military pilots also confirmed they were ordered not to drop 75% of their ordnance on ISIS targets because they
couldnt get clearance from their superiors which is exactly the kind of order the Obama administration would give to
protect ISIS.

We cant get clearance even when we have a clear target in front of us, said House Foreign Affairs Committee
Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.)
One of the reasons why the Obama administration sponsored and protected ISIS was because Assad stood in the way of a
critical natural gas pipeline that would have deposed Russia as Europes primary source of energy.

Syria is the site of the proposed construction of a massive underground gas pipeline that, if completed, could
drastically undercut the strategic energy power of U.S. ally Qatar and also would cut Turkey out of the pipeline
flow, Aaron Klein of WND reported. Dubbed the Islamic pipeline, the project may ultimately favor Russia and
Iran against Western energy interests.

In other words, ISIS is a tool used to geopolitically isolate Russia, which under Putin has deflected attempts by the global
elite to bring the country under their control disconnected from the will of the people.

Additionally, due to the centuries-old conflict between Sunni and Shia Muslims, Sunni-dominated Saudi Arabia, a close
Obama ally, wants Assads Shia government out of power.

Theres also trillions of dollars in potential oil and gas revenue in Syria that Saudi Arabia could tap into if a Western puppet
is placed into power in Syria.

Donald Trump is spot-on: Clinton and Obama have aided and abetted ISIS to achieve their geopolitical objectives
shared by their close allies and their predecessors who also created the precursors of ISIS.

Related: Trump Doubles Down On Obama Is The Founder Of ISIS Comment

Flashback: Obama Admits Were Training ISIL

"Were speeding up training of ISIL forces"


Donald Trump is taking heat for claiming President Obama and Hillary Clinton are the co-founders of ISIS, but in a
speech from July 2015 the president admitted to supporting the terror group.
As Ive said before, this aspect of our strategy was moving too slowly. But the fall of Ramadi has galvanized the
Iraqi government. So, with the additional steps I ordered last month, were speeding up training of ISIL forces,
including volunteers from Sunni tribes in Anbar Province.

- Barack Obama

The White House later changed its transcript of the speech online putting the word Iraqi in brackets after the word
ISIL, correcting Obamas mistake.

Hillarys Medical Records Revealed -This Is What Shes Hiding

No one is promised tomorrow, anything could take place to bring your life to an end. Some people
like Hillary run out of time sooner than others, she has debilitating problems that have just been
revealed to the media.
When youre in the public image there is no secret you can keep, and we all know Hillary has tried to live a double
life. Who does she think she is, God?

This small piece of information will have a HUGE impact on whether or not voters will bubble her name in the ballot come
this November. When it comes to personal health issues, Hillary has plenty, usually, people want to keep things like this
hush hush, especially this witch.

This leaked letter from Hillary Clinton's Doctor has casused much concern recently also:
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

Related: Man Who Leaked Clintons Medical Records Found Dead

She doesnt have that privilege, though, when she is trying to take on the most important job one can acquire in the
United States.

Would you want to vote for someone who cant do their job correctly because theyre too sick? We need to spread
this news around so people have an idea just who they are inviting into the White houseshes pretty much a
walking corpse.

FOX News Sean Hannity sets up the photo and the Clinton response:
The picture, which shows Hillary Clinton apparently needing assistance to climb a flight of stairs at a campaign stop back in
February was picked up by the Drudge Report, which posted the headline over the weekend, details Hillary Clintons history
with falls and speculating that the former Secretary of State could be experiencing a serious undisclosed medical condition.

Earlier today we reached out to the Clinton campaign for a statement, and a spokesman told us that the Drudge Report is
shameful, and anyone who buys into that medical condition shameful, what is missing is a statement about the health
issues.

Dr. Marc Seigel said the public has a right to know and speculated on what the issue could be but was more interested in
previous spills and a concussion she had in 2012.

I think the public has a right to know, Seigel said. Were talking in 2008, Sean, I looked over a thousand pages of
John McCains records because of a melanoma he had 10 years ago. What about Hillary? In 2009, a severe fall.
She breaks her elbow. In 2011, she boards a plane, falls. In 2012 she has a severe concussion which Bill Clinton
says took her six months to recover from."

"Then she ends up with a blood-clot in the brain and a lifetime of blood thinners, Seigel said.

Just that point alone - if shes prone to falling, you can see from that picture up there that it looked like she can
barely get upstairs without two people carrying her. Guess what if she falls and hits her head? Shell get a blood-
clot.

I want to know what her neurological records show, he added.

The picture going up the stairs speaks a million words, Dr. David Samadi said.

Is she fatigued? Is she dehydrated? One of the main reasons she fell in 2012 and had the concussions was
severe dehydration. Theyre holding her and going up the stairs. So she may be really dehydrated, she may have
arthritis, she may have back pain, she may have fallen again. We dont know.

There are questions that are unanswered. What we know today is shes on thyroid medication, she suffers from
hypothyroid, low thyroid, that can cause fatigue and gaining weight and all of that.
Why are we asking a woman who can hardly take care of herself to take care of the entire United States? This
makes no sense.

Dr. Seigel went on to say:

I think a traumatic brain injury with symptoms down the road is very, very likely here especially since she had a
blood-clot on her brain. As David mentioned that could lead to a seizure problem. Someone is carrying a
[diazepam]pen that youd use in case of a seizure, a Valium pen, that makes me wonder about that.

It is hard to pick just one reason Hillary shouldnt be president but this is close to the top of the list I would say! Watch below
to discover more secrets uncovered about Hillarys health issues.

What is with Hillary's Recent Bizzarre Behaviour?

Related: Wikileaks Releases New Emails Showing Hillary Taking Orders From George Soros

13 Important Elements To Look For In Every Staged Shooting Event


August 8 2016 | From: ZenGardner

People who dont trust government, those who think on their own and tend to question what they
hear, by now are all becoming experts at identifying false flag staged events. With so many recent
staged psyop events in the news lately many of us are getting a lot of practice at this.
But have you considered that the script has become more complex than you think? Have you considered that you
(we) are being fooled in some way as we speak? Have you taken into account that the events happening today are
all happening in a post-Jade Helm revelation AI era? Todays events are happening in a very sophisticated world of
unimaginably deep levels of political corruption actively at work and deeply focused on removing all of our rights
and freedoms and cementing their new global order.

Related: The First Question To Ask After Any Terror Attack: Was It A False Flag?

This complex and deep reality alone is something many people refuse to face; and without facing this youll never be able to
peel and dig deeper into the deep states structure, mind and mechanisms that are behind these chaotic staged psyop false
flag events.

Notice Im using the terms false flag and staged events interchangeably because at times its difficult to determine which
one is actually happening. So its fair to say that false flags are types of staged events. Were all familiar with the different
types of events; mass shooting attacks by crazed supposed lone gunmen who are the selected patsies for the event.

We also see shootings where the government conveniently retroactively tells us the shootings are courtesy ISIS, ISIS
inspired or ISIS related. In recent events we also saw a focus on the paid-for engineered race war where the selected
shooters are looking to shoot ONLY police or only white police (Dallas sniper, Baton Rouge shooting).
Conveniently these shootings work great for fanning the flames of race and class tension and division while conveniently
boosting the police state and public sympathy for police.

Whatever the type of event, notice we rarely if ever get to see any evidence whatsoever of the actual accused patsy shooter
at the scene of the crime. For example, consider that its been weeks and still no one has any actual evidence of Omar
Mateen physically entering the Pulse night club in Orlando and physically firing and killing people.

Where are these videos? Yet the majority of people have him at the scene because thats how the story goes, and
apparently its almost too stressful to believe something no one else is saying. The same could be said of the accused truck
driver terrorist in Nice, France or the actual sniper (supposed) lone gunman shooter in Dallas, Texas. You get the picture.

This anomaly only scratches the surface on what this article is about. The fact is we are all now getting used to these events,
for better or for worse, and there are many elements being shown to us that most of us are not paying attention to.
The events themselves are huge to us only because the mainstream media puts them in our faces 24/7. They are important
because the government and their mass media says they are. They (the government and their media) say this because the
events are always part of a greater agenda.

The agenda and the event itself are inseparable in a world today where the masses are conditioned into reacting to a
presented problem whose solution is later sold to them. This process of problem, reaction, solution is undeniable and
obvious to all today.

The mechanisms of the script are openly available for all to see; but, as mentioned earlier, have you considered how deep
this staged event mechanism goes? Hopefully the following 13 elements were about to point out will bring more awareness
to these additional possibilities, agendas and factors which are quietly hidden in these events but as you will see are actually
hidden in plain view.

1: The Breaking News trigger phrase

The first thing I want to point out is the whole breaking news psyop phrase. Any professional hypnotist will tell you trigger
words and phrases are important when it comes to putting someone under your spell, so it shouldnt surprise us that
mainstream media would resort to using key trigger words on the general public.
They would definitely do this because it works. And this is precisely what they do, and breaking news is probably as clever
and effective a trigger word as there is in America today. It stops you in whatever you are doing and forces you to pay
attention to new information that may change your life.

Im sure that if you monitored someones vital signs and visceral response under controlled conditions you will find a direct
response to trigger phrases like breaking news when used in the right context. Lets be aware of this trigger phrase which
always sets the initial tone with typical staged false flag events.

2: Mainstream media voice tone, speech pattern and neuro-linguistic effect

Subliminal informational submission is accomplished with classic mainstream media authority speech patterns and key use
of neuro-linguistic terms (as discussed above) that many of us dont pay attention to. Go watch any segment of mainstream
media news and see how they all talk in a certain form.

There is a certain official pattern of speech that subliminally tells the audience this is official and true certified
informational. Heres a Wikihow page discussing this very topic and notice how news reporters go through a training process
to sound official and convincing.
This speech pattern, the use of key words and overall mannerism all contributes to the early hypnotic phase when the initial
story is being officially constructed and delivered to the public.

Look for it the next time you are watching mainstream media news. Notice how the pattern of the speech is similar with all
news anchors and presenters in all the mainstream media related networks.

3: Body count used to psychologically manipulate eventual reaction

Moving on to the events themselves, notice how the Illuminati CIA controlled media especially lately is using the body count
to attach political urgency to each shooting. They are implying that if only 1, 2 or 3 people die then its a boring maybe not so
important shooting, but if 50 die then we need to get all worked up and act more urgently with political interest and legislation
to match the body count somehow.

Dont fall for the body count psyop. They are also using the body count psyop to engage you emotionally in their misery and
fear as if to imply that a higher body count means this could have been you, which, again, somehow implies that a lower
body count is maybe not so likely to have involved you and thus less worthy of your emotional attention.

4: Overly-detailed eyewitness accounts containing compelling Hollywood-style human interest


elements

We are now seeing staged interviews with poor-acting crisis actors giving us Hollywood-style details of what they
experienced during the shooting event. Crisis actor Patience Carter, one of many actors who inexplicably packed out the
Pulse night club bathrooms instead of actually leaving the club during the Orlando shooting, dramatically tells of how she was
lying on the floor when the gun fight broke one of the water pipes and she thought she was going to drown.

This segment of the story is inserted only to draw your human interest and compel you to empathize with her.
We have also seen the famous Gene Rosen interview
during Sandy Hook when he tells of 6 children who came to
his house speechless, telling him our teacher is dead and
how he followed up by giving them cookies and crying with
them.

Again this segment which was proven a lie with countless


inconsistencies, was inserted to add Hollywood-style
compelling human interest elements to the story. In the
case of Rosen, he ended up getting his own song written
after him!

And how about the testimony given by the sobbing 15-year-


old Kuwaiti girl, Nayirah, following the Iraq invasion of
Kuwait in 1990 when she testified:

"They took the babies out of the incubators, took the incubators, and left the babies on the cold floor to die."

Notice it wasnt just the floor it had to be the cold floor. All of this is staged propaganda just to compel human emotion, a
tactic that worked nicely in this case as it triggered the invasion of Iraq. Lets not fall for this element of the psyop now being
used regularly, and lets be on the lookout for it.

5: Control of the information at the ground level usually assigned to a key actor

With every event we are seeing someone at the ground level, usually a head police officer, now claiming that any
information not confirmed by them should be assumed to be false until they (and only they) say its true. We saw just this in
the recent Baton Rouge shooting and the Dallas, Texas sniper shooting.

Classically this brings to mind the one and only Lieutenant Paul Vance during Sandy Hook who declared himself the
information czar and bearer of truth and reality for the Sandy Hook show.

Again, lets not fall for the delusion that somehow police has a handle on what is real and verified truth surrounding any
event as if anyone trusts police. Since the beginning of the modern-day concept of police, police always get their information
from the people who were there not the other way around. The police themselves have never been assigned the controllers
of information for any crime scene.

So why are we suddenly deferring the details of the event to the police? But its not just police, at the Orlando nightclub
shooting we saw a team of doctors led by doctor Michael Cheatham controlling the information on behalf of hundreds of
people who would have been at the hospital.

We didnt hear from any maintenance person, nurse assistant, nursing student, radiology tech or anyone else at the hospital
in Orlando. Notice only Cheatham (and to a lesser extent his short list of fellow doctors who briefly spoke to the media) was
assigned to deliver the carefully controlled information.

Lets realize that information is now entirely controlled and the controllers are now appointing key players at the ground level
to control that information. With this control comes the threat of jail for anyone interfering with the official narrative. So in the
next event be on the lookout for the ground-level information gatekeeper.

6: Great fluctuations and changes of the narrative in the early phases of the story

Were all familiar with this next element. We listen to the initial version of the official account only to see the body count or
number of shooters change dramatically. This goes on until the authorities finally agree on the official version of what
happened.

The important thing to take notice of is that often well see the death count go from a higher number to a lower number, a
clear medical impossibility. Think to yourself, how can a body count go from higher to lower all the time? Shouldnt it be the
other way around?

And its not just the body count, the number of shooters (if there are any real shooters at all) always seems to be a problem
for the controllers, and in the end the smaller number usually works best once the assassins (if there are truly any) are
cleared to leave the scene as weve seen so many times.

7: Conflicting components potentially deliberately put out to authenticate the reality of the event

This next element is one of the most important and I urge truth seekers to pay close attention. We all saw the mysterious
man running through the woods at Sandy Hook wearing camouflage. Yet to this day no one really knows what was his role at
Sandy Hook which we now have reason to believe was not an operational school according to research done by Wolfgang
Halbig.

So why was this man briefly shown to us on TV in an era where information is so tightly controlled? Did they WANT you to
see the man running through the woods just to give the story authenticity? These are the questions we should be asking.
Why were 2 gas masks purposely left on the floor outside the theater at the Aurora Colorado shooting a few years back?
Why was even the mainstream media so quick to point out that Omar Mateen had been tracked by FBI and they knew about
him? Do you really think that the mainstream media wants you to see that the FBI is incompetent? I discussed this issue in
the context of the Orlando shooting before.

Regarding the Orlando night club event, ask yourself, why did CNN and the rest of the mainstream media allow the segment
to leak out about someone holding the door shut at the Orlando shooting so that no one can get out?

This segment should have shocked everyone. And why would the mass media then interview a man named Luis Burbano
who admits on camera that he was the one holding the door? This without question is one of the deep mysteries of the
Orlando shooting event which everyone by now has forgotten. See image below.

The point is that I firmly believe that elements are now being inserted that have several distinct effects. They serve the
purpose of authenticating the story. Even the alternative media quickly concluded that the event was real only it was a real
false flag narrative as in we believe the event happened, but it was done by paid government mercenaries or operatives.

This narrative may be entirely false but the additional segments that give it reality make it more believable. This again serves
the purpose of making the event real in one way or another to everyone but in different ways (divide and conquer) so that
those calling the entire event fake thus stand alone isolated in their views. Perhaps this is the point, again think in terms of
divide and conquer.

8: Obviously fake elements deliberately inserted to subliminally mock truth seeking community

Heres another element few are paying attention to. At this point I dont think theres any doubt that the controllers know that
a large segment of humanity has caught on to their staged events. So ask yourself, how would they use this information
against us?

How about creating an event with possible real components and then float out the obviously fake crisis actors to essentially
mock truth seekers. Again, this is a topic Ive hit on following the landmark Orlando shooting event that needs to be
reiterated.

Crisis actor victims were magically transported one block down the road only to stage a walk BACK TOWARD the Pulse
night club in front of the CNN cameras.

Why? We should all be asking this very important question. As I said in my previous articles did they WANT us to see
these obvious crisis actors? The goal is no less than to cause confusion and to potentially mock those who are looking for
the truth.

How about the crisis actor eyewitness posing for the camera at the Dallas, Texas sniper shooting practically wearing the
exact same American flag t-shirt as Christopher Hansen, the key crisis actor story teller of the Orlando event? Coincidence?
You decide.
We must now become aware of all of these elements to stay on top of the next false flag psyop event.

9: Staged cell phone footage to authenticate the story delivered by specific individuals

After doing some research Im very skeptical of the cell phone footage released during the Dallas sniper shooting. Listen to
the narrator of the video posted below and notice how he carefully narrates to point out where the shooter is.

Listen to him saying things like you see him moving around? and this guy is evil sorry, this guy needs to be killed even
though there is no way that he could know this information from the distance he is located.

According to the person who made the video below the narrator even claims to have footage of the actual shooting.
Conveniently that footage is missing and the channel he claims to have the video MK7Wolf conveniently is vanished from
YouTube.

Can it be because this video never existed? Calling for the shooters death again just seems to add to the authenticity of the
story and stirs up emotion. Watch the video for yourself beginning at around 12:40 and see what you think. Either way
(multiple shooter false flag or staged event) the video as a whole proves that the official story is a lie.

We saw similar conveniently timed sketchy cell phone footage taken of the chase at San Bernardino. Authenticating
segments of the chase was critical to the official story and the character who filmed the video, I believe, was staged there to
capture blurry indistinguishable footage that nonetheless lent authenticity to the story. We saw similar seemingly staged cell
phone footage segments at the Paris concert shooting as well.

So in the next psyop event dont fall so quickly for the ONE cell phone footage segment. Remind yourself that everyone has
a cell phone with a camera and we should be seeing massive amounts of cell phone footage of these events from many
different angles not just one.

10 Retroactive construction of the final story often takes days or weeks (or longer)
Does everyone know what stage we are in when it comes to the Orlando shooting event? Right now we are in what I will call
for the sake of this article the extended retroactive story construction period. This is the period of weeks and months
following a staged event when the controllers can roll out other events and stories to capture your attention and get your
attention away from the story.

During this period they can construct all the evidence they need but, unlike the early moments following the event, they can
actually take their time and construct this evidence with more precision and care.

For example, during this period they can construct additional surveillance camera video footage, they can pull out new
images that show the attacker entering the building, they can pull out new documents that support the official story, set up
their fake death certificates and much more.

Recall following 9/11, much later on the government released controlled images of the never before seen plane wreckage
at the Pentagon (see below) which of course on the day of the event there was not a sign anywhere of any plane having
crashed there to paraphrase Fox news own reporter on the scene.

Realize that you (we) are all being played and that with every day that goes by something else is being done to fool you. We
know they cant possibly have all their evidence ready at first and that is why they need time to synthesize their evidence.

This is what is currently happening for all the staged events weve witnessed in the recent past (June-July 2016) or so, and
Im not even going to get into the long distance story construction (think: I shot Bin Laden) and the eventual Hollywood
movie they will release to reinforce the story much later down the road.

11: Long and detailed narration of the aftermath by the mass media

Following every breaking news 24/7 psyop event notice how for the next week or two well get daily if not hourly fine tuning
of the story with lots of behind-the-scenes segments being added like for example mother of shooter apologizes, didnt see
this coming or girlfriend of shooter says he hated white people or gays or whatever it may be.

These aftermath segments are all designed to pad the official narrative and make you digest the reality of the context of the
event. As time goes on, of course, well always get details of the gun purchase, how the shooter obtained training and much
more. Obviously were all familiar with the usual manifesto as well.

12: Early reaction to the event, televised ceremonies create backdrop for multi-million dollar
funding campaigns and call for new legislation

Ive already discussed this element in previous articles but its worth mentioning again here. The long emotional and morality
based ceremonies talking about god and the lord, love, forgiveness at a time like this, are all part of the period setting
up the big money train and legislation that is to follow.
The ceremonies thus act as a calm before the storm and charges up the participants into an emotional state where they are
prepared to take action. Who can forget Sandy Hook crisis actor and fake FBI agent David Wheeler (along with his wife)
touring the country telling his compelling story, desperately calling for gun control.

13: Subsequent psyop staged false flag events are used as opportunities to rekindle the reality
of past events

Finally, we are now seeing how staged false flag events are being used as golden opportunities to rekindle the memory of
other staged events just in case you have forgotten.

Look for this tactic which they are using every time now. This is a reminder that the gun control agenda is a process. Its not
about one event, they are in a mission filled with many events that need reinforcement. The events are playing out differently.
Some may have elements of reality and others not.

They are potentially mixing realities and challenging you to guess which one it is. Confusion and chaos, as I pointed out in a
recent article, are the goal and now the norm.
Plain and simple, as I continue to warn, were all being played in one way or another. The deception is so deep I can only
present, as I see it, the various segments of these ongoing deceptions. No one said this information war and defending
freedom would be easy and for anyone still in the old model of real event versus false flag real event you are falling
behind in the information war.

As I said earlier, the tactics are now much more sophisticated and the game has changed. The goal is to confuse you into
submission and we have to look at all elements of these events in the context of our new reality.

If you agree please share this message.

Related: People Are Finally Learning About False Flag Terror

New Zealand Troops To Stay In Iraq For Another 18 Months: John Key
August 5 2016 | From: KiwiWatch

John Key and his government is going to retain New Zealand troops in Irag for another 18 months
also deploying them to a second military base with the total associated costs now reaching
$50million for the New Zealand taxpayer to fork out. He says, according to the Hawkes Bay
Today item of June 21st that the Work in Iraq is not done, that it would be difficult to do nothing
when 66 other countries were contributing.
This is rubbish and must be condemned. Contributing to what?

Related: Exposed - Iraq War Was A Lie: The Invasion Of Iraq Took Place Under False Pretences

The disaster impacting Iraq and costing millions of Iraqi lives either dead, maimed or now displaced and homeless is entirely
an American war of aggression, an illegal invasion based on lies (weapons of mass destruction of which there were
none) and into which the U.S. has dragged a number of subservient countries like New Zealand that acquiesce to American
commands. John Key is one foreign Prime Minister who serves U.S. expectations at our expense.

Defence Minister Gerry Brownlee says we are training Iraqis to be able to take control of their own lands and fight Islamic
State, but this is also a lie. NZ is involved in Iraq because we were pressured to get involved by America so as to make the
destruction of this once proud country seem like all of the West (the coalition of the willing) is there fighting terrorism.
Rubbish.
Related: Message From Iraqi Children To America And The World + Israeli IDF Colonel Leading ISIS Terrorists
Arrested in Iraq

The terrorist is the United States itself driven by Washington neocons (predominantly Zionist Jews) with one objective; a
destabilised and weakened Middle East being part of the Greater Israel policy, part of the original vision enunciated by the
founding father of Zionism Theodore Herzl now promoted by the Israeli government and supported in the U.S. by the Jewish
Lobby, an immensely powerful political group in the U.S. politics.

Greater Israel consists of an area from the Nile to the Euphrates and involves the exclusion of Palestinians from their own
lands and the Jewish settlement in occupied Palestinian lands.

Related: Top Israeli General Speaks Out Against Israels Crimes Against Palestinians + Parallels Between Israel &
1930's Germany & Ten Facts Why Netanyahu Is A Criminal And That Israel Is A Rogue State

Iraq is predominantly Islamic so which part of Iraqi Islamists are we training? Are they Sunni or Shia and then which sect of
these Islamic divisions? Out of the vacuum of destruction delivered by U.S. bombs rose Islamic State, the violent group that
the CIA secretly funded for years in Libya and continue to do so now in neighbouring Syria.

These are indisputable facts not reported by mainstream to keep us in the dark about American objectives. Among others, it
is to grab the oil, oil that is now reported recently contracted by the newly U.S. installed puppet government of Iraq to U.S.
oil companies.

I wonder why Gerry Brownlee recently visited Israel in early May? The visit was kept pretty quiet, the Blog site Whale
Oil being the first to reveal the news. Perhaps to discuss trade? Or perhaps to discuss new farming techniques? Its
doubtful that any of these things were discussed.
It is far more likely that Brownlee was there to be bought off by the Israeli government to become a strong advocate of
continuing war in Iraq and Syria. This is how they operate.

So here we are: New Zealand doing its bit helping the big players in their dirty war of attrition in Arab lands where we blame
the Arabs for all the wrongs in the world as we crush them one country after another creating crises the world over.

Maybe even Brexit is an unexpected outcome to the global elites that is a response to the refugee crisis created by the
bombing and destruction of Syria.

Even more importantly, how many more schools or hospitals are New Zealanders forgoing to remain entrenched, indeed
trapped into an American war that is none of our doing or business? Our media and the entertainment dished up nightly on
Television is all about numbing minds to expect war, indeed to glorify war.
It is outrageous that we are involved with troops in Iraq training the locals to in fact continue to kill even more of themselves
because this work will never be complete. There are much bigger agendas in play, none of which are our business accept to
object to these policies of destruction, much less to be part of them. We should indeed choose to do nothing.

Bring our troops home now and condemn American led hostilities in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, indeed anywhere in the world.

Related: Israel - A Nation Founded Upon A Monumental Lie

NATO Information Operations: War Is Peace, Freedom Is Slavery


August 3 2016 | From: SouthFront

Psychological Operations or PSYOP are planned operations to convey selected information and
indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately
the behavior of organizations, groups, and individuals.
The beginning of interest in post-Cold War information operations can be traced to the UN intervention in Somalia
and the Rwanda Genocide. Relatively honest and direct reporting from these war zones meant that the public
opinion of Western countries was a factor that had to be considered by the political classes.

Hence the complaining at the time about the so-called CNN Effect which forced the politicians to send and/or withdraw
troops irrespective of what the elites actually wanted to happen at the time.

The early methods of influencing the public opinion by manipulating the media, though reasonably effective, were not
enough.

We have seen their strengths and limitations during both wars against Iraq, in which the bulk of the media was effectively
co-opted through the process of frequent press briefings (featuring no shortage of videos showing NATO bombs unerringly
falling toward their obviously evil targets) and later by embedding the mostly male reporters in military units, which
naturally had the dual effect of stroking their egos and adopting the militarys point of view.

Still, in spite of all that, it proved impossible to control the narrative, and the public support for the various US and NATO
wars collapsed under the pressure of inconvenient news coming even from mainstream media which clearly maintained a
degree of independence.

But if you fast-forward a decade, to the current wars in Libya, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Ukraine, and others, it is clear that
something has changed. There is one dominant narrative that is being pushed by literally every mainstream media source,
irrespective of their ostensible ideological bent.
No matter where you turn, you read or hear about Assads barrel bombs, Gaddafis massacres, or Russian aggression.

These reports invariably represent a point of view that is not only completely one-sided, but also factually wrong, even on
the most basic of issues. How did US and NATO manage to achieve such an amazing discipline within the supposedly free
and independent Western media?

There are essentially three parts to the answer: state oversight of the media; co-opting individual reporters; disseminating
propaganda through covert means.

The first two are obvious enough and have long been practiced. Media corporations are just that corporations, subject to
variety of laws and regulations whose enforcement can be used to steer individual outlets toward adopting a desired point of
view.

Individual reporters coin of the realm is access to privileged information, which may be granted or withheld depending on
their effectiveness as government propagandist. The third, the covert dissemination of propaganda, is new, and that factor
likely explains the lack of variation from one media outlet to the next.

The media are no longer merely encouraged to toe the official linethey have the stories planted for them to pick up through
social media and other unofficial channels.
The so-called investigations of the MH17 disaster is a case study, though a fairly crude one due to Ukraines crude methods
of information warfare.

But it is evident that nearly all the evidence implicating Russia or the Novorossia insurgents was prepared by Ukrainian
secret services, then laundered through social media, before being presented to Western audiences as the truth, the only
truth, and nothing but the truth.

NATO is conducting similar operations which are harder to identify and counter because they are more sophisticated, better
institutionalized, and provided with higher levels of funding. The United Kingdom, for example, maintains the 77th Brigade
whose subunits include the Media Operations Group and the shadowy 15th Psychological Operations Group that has been
dubbed the Twitter detachment.

Germany has established the ZOpKomBw, or the Bundeswehr Rapid Communications Center. In the US, information
operations against the US population appear to be the responsibility of the intelligence community, which is understandable
considering the taboo on US military operations on US territory.
As such, they remain largely out of public scrutiny, though their handiwork can be readily seen in the form of unverifiable
reports from a variety of war zones, and even placing specially prepared witnesses in front of Congressional committees.
Even non-NATO countries like Sweden are following suit by establishing their own information operations units intended for
waging information war on its own population.

At the NATO level, information operations are coordinated by NATO doctrine JP 13-3 Information Operations, with practical
applications honed by alliance-wide exercises such as the Multinational Information Operations Experiment (MNIOE).

Western voters have been accepting of all these measures because they were sold to them as part of their countries
counter-terrorism measures.

What they failed to take into account is that terrorism is a phenomenon that knows no borders, with the enemy already
present among Western societies.
Which means that, if counter-terrorist information operations are to be effective, they also have to be aimed at
Western publics.

In the short-term, information operations may be effective in manufacturing popular support for policies that otherwise no
free society would accept. In the longer term, bypassing the public opinion means the elites are now more free than ever to
embark on highly dangerous international adventures that will likely backfire and lower even further the already low standing
of the elites.

Therefore the fact that the so-called free world elites increasingly have to resort to such dirty tricks in order to
stay in power means that their grasp on power is slowly weakening.

Checkmate! U.S. Loses Syria & Turkey; Erdogan Will Visit Putin + John McCain Is
Directly Responsible For ISIS
July 30 2016 | From: Geopolitics / Sputnik / Various

Its confirmed: the United States is being checkmated in Syria and in Turkey. Now, Erdogan is set
to visit Moscow early next month.

They will be talking about how to dispense with the CIA moderate rebels we know as Daesh Islamic State
terrorists.

Commenting on the results of the recent meeting on Syria in Geneva between Russia, the UN and the US and on
the prospects of a possible ending of the Syrian war, Russian political expert Vyacheslav Matuzov suggests that
much will now depend on the talks between Russia and Turkey: if they agree, the rebels and their US / Israeli
masters will lose the war.

Turkish President Erdogan is set to visit Moscow on August 9. Prior to his meeting with President Putin there have
already been a number of announcements on the joint economic projects and the readiness to open Turkey
for Russian tourists, Matuzov, former diplomat and an expert in Arab studies told Russias Izvestiya newspaper.
This means that certain political agreements are also being prepared, he added.

The political analyst further explained that first of all, it could be about closing the Turkish-Syrian border and, as a
result, cutting-off of the influx of rebels and arms into war-torn Syria.

Matuzov suggested that the issue might have been already been agreed upon.

If the border is closed, the opposition and their American masters will lose the war in Syria.

Syria: Before and After 'American Dermocracy'

In any further intra-Syrian talks, which could be scheduled at the end of August in Geneva, the US and their so-called
allies will have no grounds to dictate any conditions.

This point of view has been echoed by Dr. Bassam Abu Abdallah, Director of the Center for Strategic Studies at Damascus
University, who told the newspaper that Syria is not counting on the negotiations in Geneva, but rather on a rapprochement
between Russia and Turkey.

The Riyadh-formed High Negotiations Committee (HNC) is prone to US influence and the influence of the Middle
Eastern states and is not acting in the interests of Syria, he said.
While he does not expect any progress in the negotiations, the expert suggests that the failed coup attempt in Turkey will
push Ankara to reconsider its foreign policy objectives.

The US has been accused of being behind the attempted military overthrow, he said. Washington is also for the further
break up of Syria and for creating Kurdish autonomy.

All the above, he said, is unacceptable to Turkey, and so it will try to get closer to Russia and Iran and might make the
decision to close its border with Syria which will result in a dramatic change in the balance of powers on the battlefield, he
concluded.

Recent reports suggest that the next round of intra-Syrian talks could be scheduled for the end of August.

The Syrian government delegation, as well as three opposition groups - the Riyadh-formed HNC, the Moscow-Cairo and the
Hmeymim groups - have been taking part in the UN-mediated Geneva talks on the peaceful settlement of the conflict.

The latest round of talks took place in Geneva on April 13-27. The HNC walked out of the negotiations, citing the continuous
fighting in Syria and the lack of progress on humanitarian issues.

Both Russia and Syria are now conducting a large scale humanitarian operations after a successful establishment
of humanitarian corridors for the civilians trapped inside Aleppo.

Russia and Syria are launching a large-scale humanitarian operation for Aleppo residents, Russias Defense Ministry said.
Corridors for civilians and militants ready to lay down arms will be created to exit the city, which was Syrias largest before
the war.
We have repeatedly called on the warring parties to reconcile, but the militants violated the silence mode each
time, shelled villages, attacked the positions of government troops. As a result, a tough humanitarian situation has
developed in the city of Aleppo and its suburbs, Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu said on Thursday.

To assist civilians taken hostage by terrorists, as well as militants who chose to lay down their weapons, the
Russian center for reconciliation of the warring parties, together with Syrian authorities, will open three
humanitarian corridors there, Shoigu added.

I want to emphasize that we are taking this step, first and foremost, to ensure the safety of Aleppo residents, the
minister said. He has also urged international organizations to take part in the humanitarian operation in Aleppo.

According to the minister, the fourth corridor for the passage of fighters in Aleppo is being set up only because the
US has not provided Russia with data on the al-Nusra Front terrorist group, which has recently been attempting to
merge with other armed opposition groups in Syria.

Obama is also preventing another Saigon-like withdrawal from Afghanistan by not bringing all US soldiers home
until he steps down from office.

John McCain Is Directly Responsible For ISIS

Related: Turkeys secret pact with Islamic State exposed by operative behind wave of ISIS attacks
Leaked DNC Emails Prove Once And For All That The Conspiracy Theorists Were
Right All Along + FBI Source: Clinton Foundation Can Bring Down Entire Government
July 28 2016 | From: NaturalNews / Infowars / Breitbart

To anyone who has ever been called a "conspiracy theorist," the world owes you a massive
apology. As the leaked DNC emails now exhaustively prove, Hillary Clinton and the DNC actually
did conspire to destroy Bernie Sanders.

It was a genuine conspiracy involving a multitude of people who acted in coordinated secrecy to deceive the
public, destroy a candidate and coronate their chosen evil globalist (Hillary Clinton) as President.

Related: The Clinton Presidential Campaign just went Kaboom!

The only thing that makes this conspiracy any different than all the other true conspiracies happening right now is that they
got caught.

And now, the entire leftist media -- which is also part of the very same conspiracy to thrust Clinton into office -- is trying to
distract you from all this by invoking their own hilarious conspiracy theory: The Russians did it!

Yep, suddenly now the same leftist media skeptics who ridiculed anyone even hinting that the DNC was running a
conspiracy to destroy Sanders is floating its own tin foil hat theories in a desperate bid to hope you won't read any of the
emails that actually leaked. Those emails, it turns out, expose the DNC and Hillary Clinton as a cabal of corrupt political
mafia bosses who deeply hate voters, democracy and a free press.
The DNC even rewarded top donors with political appointments to the boards of federal organizations. If you give them
enough money, they'll make sure Hillary lands you a spot in your favorite federal bureaucracy (the United States Postal
Service is apparently in need of several BORED members... ha ha).

Check out some of these email findings for yourself:

All the dirt (so far) from the 19,000 leaked emails: TheGatewayPundit

DNC staffers revealed as total bigots who tried to destroy Bernie Sanders by attacking his religion: GovtSlaves

Obedient MSNBC morons report "cheers" when the audience is BOOING Debbie Wasserman Schultz off the stage:
(see the text along bottom of the video): ZeroHedge

It Was the Russians!

But you're not supposed to pay any attention to all the admissions of crime and corruption found in these emails. Never mind
the fact that all these DNC members need to be arrested, indicted and put behind bars for 20 years to life. They're all
corrupt criminals who despise democracy and use the power of their positions to rig elections and place sleazebag
politicians into public office. The voters be damned!

No, you're supposed to think to yourself, "It was the Russians!" And right on cue, the leftist media is now floating the
ludicrous idea that Putin loves Trump and wants Trump to win the presidency. Why is this idea so ludicrous?
Because Hillary Clinton is the sellout who approve the selling of America's uranium reserves to Russian mining
companies, sacrificing a strategic national resource so she and her husband Bill could collect a few more million dollars in
"speaking fees." (Source: CLINTON CASH book and documentary.)

In other words, the Russians get everything they want when democrats are in power, because democrats are corrupt
criminals who are willing to sell anything to the Russians (as long as the donation fee is high enough to the Clinton
Foundation). Thus, the idea that Putin wouldn't want Clinton in the White House is absurd.

But this is all best said by none other than Patrick Buchanan in this WND.com editorial which I offer here as a partial reprint:

Waving off the clerics who had come to administer last rites, Voltaire said: "All my life I have ever made but one
prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make my enemies look ridiculous.' And God granted it."

The tale of the thieved emails at the Democratic National Committee is just too good to be true.

For a year, 74-year-old socialist Bernie Sanders has been saying that, under DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman
Schultz, the party has been undercutting his campaign and hauling water for Hillary Clinton.

From the 19,200 emails dumped the weekend before Clinton's coronation, it appears the old boy is not barking
mad. The deck was stacked; the referees were in the tank; the game was rigged.

For four decades, some of us have wondered what Jim McCord, security man at CREEP, and his four Cubans
were looking for in DNC Chair Larry O'Brien's office at the Watergate. Now it makes sense.

Among the lovely schemes the DNC leaders worked up to gut Sanders in Christian communities of West Virginia
and Kentucky, was to tell these good folks that Sanders doesn't even believe that there is a God. He's not even an
agnostic; he's an atheist.

The idea was broached by DNC chief financial officer Brad Marshall in an email to DNC chief executive officer Amy
Dacey:

"Does [Bernie] believe in a God. He has skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist.
This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference
between a Jew and atheist."

Dacey emailed back, "Amen."


In 1960, John F. Kennedy went before the Houston ministers to assert the right of a Catholic to be president of the
United States. Is the "Marshall Plan," to quietly spread word Bernie Sanders is a godless atheist, now acceptable
politics in the party of Barack Obama?

If Marshall and Dacey are still around at week's end, we will know.

The WikiLeaks dump came Friday night. By Sunday, Clinton's crowd had unleashed the mechanical rabbit, and the
press hounds were dutifully chasing it. The new party line: The Russians did it!

Clinton campaign chief Robert Mook told ABC, "experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke in to the
DNC, took all these emails, and now they are leaking them out through the Web sites. some experts are now
telling us that this was done by the Russians for the purpose of helping Donald Trump."

Monday, Clinton chairman John Podesta said there is a "kind of bromance going on" between Trump and Vladimir
Putin. Campaign flack Brian Fallon told CNN, "There is a consensus among experts that it is indeed Russia that is
behind this hack of the DNC."

Purpose: Change the subject. Redirect the media away from the DNC conspiracy to sabotage Sanders' campaign.

Assange: "A Lot More Material" Will Be Released"

FBI Source: Clinton Foundation Can Bring Down Entire Government

The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the email servers, source reveals.

The Clinton Foundation is a massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of
high-level people, according to an anonymous insider who revealed why the FBI stopped short of indicting Hillary
Clinton.
Related: IRS Launches Investigation Of Clinton Foundation

Before FBI Director James Comey announced the FBI wouldnt recommend pressing charges against Clinton, an insider
with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case hosted an little-publicized AMA session on 4Chan, and
the statements he made on July 2 corroborate with later developments of the scandal.

There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down, he revealed.

People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is.

Whether she will be [indicted] or not depends on how much info others involved gets out, and there are a lot of
people involved.

Since then, both the FBI and the DOJ declined to press charges against Clinton, and other sources revealed the Clinton
Foundation is now under scrutiny.

The problem is with the Clinton Foundation as I mentioned, which you should just imagine as a massive spider
web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people, the source said.

Though I do not have a high opinion of Hillary, she is just a piece albeit a big piece of this massive sh*tstorm."

Those implicated extends to the Justice Dept.

The DOJ is most likely looking to save itself, he continued.

Find everyone involved in the Clinton Foundation, from its donors to its Board of Directors, and imagine they are
all implicated.
This would explain why Bill Clinton forced himself on Attorney General Loretta Lynchs plane at the Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport last week; Clinton insider Larry Nichols said blackmail was likely involved.

Bill Clinton met with Lynch, and he was there to assure her that when Hillary gets to be president shell be able to
keep her job, said Nichols on the Alex Jones Show Friday.

I would imagine he gave Lynch a slip of paper that had on it a couple of things about the career prosecutors that
are working the case. What was on that? The things they have on them. The drugs, women, men, whatever.

The source indicated the Clinton Foundation is likely a nexus of blackmail material keeping everyone in D.C. in line
behind the Clintons even those with tremendous influence.

The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the email server, he said.

We received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the Clinton Foundation.

Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.

The server was in Benghazi? Was that one of the reasons why the embassy was attacked, to destroy evidence on the
Clinton Foundation?

Additionally, the source said the investigation took so long because FBI Director James Comey didnt want to face
the Clinton Machine and the rest of Washington D.C.

This case would explode into a million other cases if fully brought to light, and then we would be one
agency competing against the entire government and a hoard of other interests, he continued.

It is a very tense and uncomfortable position.

Interestingly, the insider spoke more about Clintons relationship with President Obama, which seems frosty at times despite
Obama currently campaigning for his former Secretary of State.

The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the email server, he said. We received the server from
Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the Clinton Foundation.

Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.

Obama and Hillary do hate each other, he said. Hillary hates black people and Obama dislikes recklessness.

On Thursday, Breitbart reported the FBI is is still investigating Hillary Clinton in connection with possible
corruption related to the Clinton Foundation.

Clinton Cash Movie Surpasses 500,000 Views In 48 Hours

News showed the motion picture adaptation of Clinton Cash three times in three-hour windows. In
those total nine hours of Saturday and Sunday viewing, there were 290,000 video views.
Pirated versions of the film have already begun sprouting up online, with one YouTube upload alone currently
showing more than 215,800 views.

In total, more than 500,000 people have pressed play on this film. But, of course, that half million views number does not
take into account the massive amount of people who held watch parties or watched Clinton Cash with their family and
friends during the weekend.

Indeed, several comments have been posted on Breitbart.com and various social media platforms from people saying they
and their friends and family were watching the Clinton Cash movie together in groups.

Its hard to know just how many millions of Americans may have tuned in to watch Clinton Cash during its two-day global
release.

As Breitbart News reported, the film was pushed heavily on social media by more than 283,000 dyed-in-the-wool Bernie
Sanders supporters, who helped catapult Clinton Cash to the top of Facebooks trending topics list on Sunday.

Related: 21 New Clinton Cash Revelations That Have Imperiled Hillary Clintons Campaign

Related: 11 Explosive Clinton Cash Facts Mainstream Media Confirm are Accurate

Due to overwhelming response and request, Breitbart News has decided to make Clinton Cash available for free forever.

Clinton Cash was directed by M.A. Taylor and was written and produced by Danny Fleurette and Breitbart News Executive
Chairman Stephen K. Bannon.
The film exposes the alarming pattern of record-high speaking fees to Bill Clinton and donations to the Clinton Foundation
from foreign contributors, which coincided with favors for those closest to the Clintons and their foundation donors while
Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state.

Related: Historic Civil Law Suit against Alleged War Criminal George W. Bush in California: Chilcot Report
Submitted to the Ninth Circuit Court

The Atlantic Council: The Marketing Arm Of The Military / Security Complex
July 27 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

How much did the military-security complex pay the Atlantic Council to publish this sales pitch to
Poland to load up on US weapons systems? The sales pitch was written by arms salesmen
Richard Shirreff, a partner at Strategia Worldwide Ltd., and Maciej Olex-Szczytowski, a business
adviser specializing in defense.

The sales pitch is titled Arming For Deterrence. The Kremlin is unpredictable, say the arms salesmen, and could
at any moment decide to attack Poland. However the Russian regime respects a show of force and would back
down if Poland has a sufficient inventory of US weapons.

Related: The Conspiracy to Rule the World #50: The Atlantic Council

The sales pitch encourages Poland to take many aggressive and dangerous steps toward Russia, such as targeting Russia
cities and facilities including RT. But before provoking the Bear like this, Poland needs to join the tactical nuclear capability
scheme within NATO, so enabling its F-16s to be carriers of tactical nuclear ordnance.

Poland also needs to be able to strike deep inside Russia and for this needs to purchase American long-range JASSM air-
launched cruise missiles, the Navy Strike missile coastal missiles, and the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket Systems.

Poland also needs offensive cyber operations and more tandem-warhead Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGMs) capable of
penetrating reactive armor, and also anti-aircraft (including anti-helicopter) and anti-UAV missiles.
The bill for this deterrence against non-existent Russian aggression comes to some US $26 billion on top of planned
expenditures of US $34 billion.

Poland should move forward expeditiously with procurements, say the arms salesmen or risk being attacked by
superior Russian forces.

The zionist neocons get away with their warmongering because it is profitable for the US military/security complex. Whereas
the crazed neocons want real war, the military / security complex only wants the propaganda threat of war. The numerous
military / foreign policy think tanks funded by the military / security complex provide the propaganda and made-up threat.

This is a dangerous game, because the Russians see a real threat in the hostility that is directed at them.
The anti-Russian propaganda is universal and includes the Olympic Games. Washington wants Russia excluded based on
the allegation that only Russians take performance-enhancing substances.

What extraordinary nonsense.

I have a relative who travels widely to test athletes of every sport, even golf, for the use of performance-enhancing
substances.

It is not the Russians who have corrupted clean sports. It is the money that the corrupt Americans have poured into
sports. To be a champion, to win the Masters at Augusta National, to win a gold medal means to be a multi-millionaire.

Sports that people once played for enjoyment are now a lucrative profession.

Money corrupts everything, and it is capitalism that turns everything into a commodity that is bought and sold. In capitalist
regimes everything is for sale: honor, integrity, justice, truth.

Everything is reduced to the filthy lucre.

Related: Putin to Western 'Elites': Play-Time is Over


WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Says His Next Leak Will virtually Guarantee An
Indictment Of Hillary Clinton
July 25 2016 | From: ScienceIsConsent

In a recent interview with ITV, Assange said the whistleblowing website will soon be leaking
documents that will provide enough evidence for the Department of Justice to indict the
presumptive Democratic nominee.

WikiLeaks has already published 30,322 emails from Clintons private email server, spanning from June 30, 2010 to
August 12, 2014. While Assange didnt specify what exactly was in the emails, he did tell ITV that WikiLeaks
had accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton, which could proceed to an indictment.

Related: WikiLeaks posts 20,000 DNC Emails

The founder Sharon Tennison has focused on making people-people connections including the business community, Rotary
clubs, etc..This delegation was organized because of concern about escalating international tensions and the danger of a
drift toward world threatening military conflict.

Assange hinted that the emails slated for publication contain additional information about the Clinton Foundation. He also
reminded ITVs Robert Peston that previously released emails contained one damning piece of communication from Clinton,
instructing a staffer to remove the classification settings from an official State Department communication and send it
through a nonsecure channel.

Related: Berto Jongman: 20,000 DNC Emails Showing Malfeasance Now Posted by WikiLeaks with Thanks to
Guccifer
Assange then pointed out that the Obama administration has previously prosecuted numerous whistleblowers for violating
the governments procedures for handling classified documents.

In regard to the ongoing FBI investigation, however, Assange expressed a lack of confidence in the Obama administrations
Justice Department to indict the former Secretary of State.

[Attorney General Loretta Lynch] is not going to indict Hillary Clinton. Its not possible that could happen. But the FBI could
push for new concessions from the Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment.

WikiLeaks has long been a thorn in the side of the former Secretary of State, who called on President Obama to prosecute
the whistleblowing site after its 2010 leak of State Department cables. Julian Assange remains confined to the Ecuadorian
Embassy in downtown London, as Ecuador has promised to not hand over the WikiLeaks founder to US authorities.

Relayted: Leaked DNC Emails Confirm Democrats Rigged Primary, Reveal Extensive Media Collusion

Related: 10 ways the Democratic primary has been rigged from the start

The Myth Of Aggressive Russia


July 23 2016 | From: GlobalResearch

Recently I went on a 15 day visit to Russia organized by the Center for Citizen Initiatives.The group
visited Moscow, the Crimean peninsula, Krasnodar (southern Russia) and St. Petersburg.
In each location we met many locals and heard diverse viewpoints. CCI has a long history promoting friendship
and trying to overcome false assumptions between citizens of the USA and Russia.

The founder Sharon Tennison has focused on making people-people connections including the business community, Rotary
clubs, etc..This delegation was organized because of concern about escalating international tensions and the danger of a
drift toward world threatening military conflict.

We were in Russia in late June as they were commemorating the 75th anniversary of the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union.

They call it the Great Patriotic War where 27 million Soviet citizens died. In Russia its a very sober occasion in which they
pay tribute to the fallen, acknowledge the heroes and underscore the horrors of war. Virtually everyone in Russia lost family
members in World War 2 and there seems to be a deep understanding of what war and invasion mean.
It is alarming to see the constant drumbeat in Western media that Russia is aggressive, Russia invaded Crimea, Russia is a
threat. Hardly a day goes by that the New York Times does not have an editorial or news story with the assertion or
insinuation that Russia is aggressive.

Todays op-ed by Andrew Foxall is an example. The think tank director bemoans the British departure from the European
Union and suggests that Russian President Putin may be behind it:

"Mr. Putin has spent the past 16 years trying to destabilize the West.. After Brexit, the union has lost not only
one of its most capable members, but also one of its two nuclear powers and one of its two seats at the United
Nations Security Council...

Mr. Putin checked the European Unions expansion when he invaded Ukraine in 2014. The Continents security
order is now in a perilous plight: If Mr. Putin senses weakness, he will be tempted into further aggression."
It is now common to hear the claim that Russia invaded Ukraine and is occupying Crimea.

The US and allies have imposed sanctions because of the Crimean decision to separate from Ukraine and rejoin Russia.
Tourist cruise ships no longer stop at Crimean ports and international airlines are prohibited from flying directly to the
international airport at the Crimean capital, Simferopol. Students from Crimean universities cannot transfer their academic
credits to universities internationally.

Despite the sanctions and problems, Crimea appears to be doing reasonably well. In the past two years, the airport has
been rebuilt and modernized. The streets of Balaclava, Sevastopol, Simferopol and Yalta are busy and bright. No doubt
things could be much better and residents want the sanctions lifted, but there were no evident signs of shortages or
poverty.

On the contrary, kids were enjoying ice cream, parks were full and streets busy late into the night. The famous Artek Youth
Camp near Yalta is being refurbished with new dormitories, state of the art swimming pool and gymnasium. Right now they
are handling 3,000 youth in the camp at one time with 30,000 kids from all over Russia this year.

A 12 mile bridge connecting Crimea to southern Russia is now half complete. A impressive video showing the design
is here.

After 22 years as part of independent Ukraine following the breakup of the Soviet Union, what drove the people of Crimea to
overwhelmingly support a referendum calling for re-unification with Russia? Was this the result of intimidation or an
occupation by Russia?
We received a very strong sense from talking with many different people in Crimea that they are happy with their decision.
The impetus was not aggression from Russia; the impetus came from the violence and ultra-nationalism of the foreign
backed coup in Ukraine.

Protests against Ukraines Yanukovych government began in November 2013 in the Maidan (central square) in Kiev.
Protesters included right wing nationalist and Nazi sympathizers hostile to the Yanukovych government. A significant faction
glorified the Ukrainian Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera.

The US was deeply involved in promoting the Maidan protests and strategizing how to bring in a new government.
Assistant Secy of State Victoria Nuland demanded the Yanukovych government do nothing to stop or prevent the increasing
vandalism, attacks and intimidation.

With thugs in the street increasingly clashing with police, the US pressed the Ukrainian government to break economic ties
with Russia as a condition for closer relations with Europe and loans from the International Monetary Fund.

On the surface, the US was encouraging Ukraine to strengthen ties with the European Union but in reality Nulands goals
were about the US, NATO and undermining Russia. This was dramatically revealed in a secretly recorded phone
call between Nuland and the US Ambassador to the Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt.
Nuland and Pyatt discussed who should and should not be in the coup government two weeks before the coup happened.
As they conspired over the phone, Nuland expressed her displeasure with the EUs reluctance to push the coup...

Fuck the EU said the woman who six weeks earlier spoke glowingly of Ukraines European aspirations.

Prior to the coup, Nuland spoke of the high US investment in promoting democracy in Ukraine. In a December
2013 speech she said:

Since Ukraines independence in 1991 the United States has supported Ukrainians as they build democratic skills
and institutions, as they promote civic participation and good governance, all of which are preconditions for
Ukraine to achieve its European aspirations.

We have invested over $5 billion to assist Ukraine in these and other goals (approx 7:30 into the recording / US-
Ukraine Foundation, 13 December 2013).

In mid December hundreds of Crimeans traveled to Kiev in buses to join peaceful protests in opposition to the Maidan
protests seen on television. They stayed in Kiev through January and into February until the violence exploded on February
18 (2014). Altogether, 82 persons were killed including 13 police and 1100 injured.

At that point, the Crimeans decided peaceful protest was useless and to return home. The bus caravan departed Kiev on
Feb 20 but was stopped at night near the town of Korsun.

The buses were torched and the Crimean travelers brutalized, beaten and seven killed. When news of this reached Crimea,
it was yet another cause for alarm.

A video titled The Crimes of Euromaidan Nazis documents the events and includes interviews with numerous passengers.
These atrocities against unarmed Crimeans were done on a public highway with no intervention from local Ukrainian police.
On Feb 21 the existing government came to a compromise agreement. But that did not appease the most violent protesters
or their supporters. A parliamentarian was beaten in broad daylight and threats issued. President Yanukovych fled for his life
and a new government, led by Victoria Nulands choice Arseniy Yatsenyuk, took charge.

The US and western allies quickly recognized the new government while Russia objected it was an illegal coup. In the first
days of the new government a bill was passed to make Ukrainian the sole official language of the country.

Indeed there was aggression and violence in Ukraine but it was not from Russia. Rather, evidence indicated the violence
was from the forces which led the coup. This was revealed in an intercepted phone conversation between British
representative to the European Union, Catherine Ashton, and the Estonian Foreign Minister, Urmas Paet.

Paet reported that he had been to Kiev and;

There is a stronger and stronger understanding that behind snipers it was not Yanukovych, it was somebody from
the new coalition.

Instead of probing into the facts behind this dramatic information, Ashton said Oh gosh. We will need to look into that and
quickly moved on.

Crimeans we spoke with described their shock and outrage at the events. In just four months they witnessed violent Maidan
protests, the overthrow of the elected government, beatings and killings of citizens returning from Kiev, and then the removal
of Russian as an official language.

In response, local leaders recommended a Crimea wide referendum with the option to officially re-unite with the country that
Crimea had been part of for over two centuries. A referendum was held on March 16. Turnout was 89% with 96% voting in
favor of the reunification of Crimea with Russia.

With the violent overthrow of the Kiev government and clear proof of US involvement in the coup it seems highly inaccurate
to say that Russia invaded or is occupying Crimea. On the contrary, it seems to be the USA and allies which are
aggressive.
The same reversal of reality is going on with the expansion of NATO. In recent weeks NATO has placed armed forces in
Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. NATO military expenses are already 13 times greater than that of Russia yet NATO
plans to increase military spending even more.

Meanwhile the US unilaterally withdrew from the Anti Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty in 2002 and is busy building and
installing ABM sites in Alaska and now eastern Europe. With a serious face they have previously claimed these sites are
being installed because of the danger of Iranian missiles but only a fool could take that seriously.

There is the additional risk that the same sites could be converted from anti ballistic missiles to contain nuclear warheads.

Are NATO and the US preparing for war? The public should be asking hard questions to our political and military leaders as
they waste our tax dollars and risk global conflagration.

When the audio recording of Nuland and Pyatt discussing how to midwife the Kiev coup was revealed, the State Dept
spokesperson was grilled about it. She responded Thats what diplomats do.

Enough of the nonsense that Russia is aggressive when the evidence indicates its the USA and allies who are
destabilizing other countries, escalating a new arms buildup and promoting conflict instead of diplomacy.

The Nice Terror Attack, Frances Prime Minister Manuel Valls: We Must Learn To Live
With The Terror, Like Israel
& The Nice Terror Attack: Towards A Permanent State Of Emergency?
July 17 2016 | From: GlobalResearch / GlobalResearch / Various

In the aftermath of the tragic terrorist attack in Nice, France, one of the most popular talking
points which has emerged throughout much of the western media coverage is the idea that
terrorism is now a normal part of our everyday lives and that a permanent state of military alert at
home is something the public needs to get used to.
One of the central voices of this police state talking is French Prime Minister and avid Israeli advocate Manuel
Valls. Earlier today Valls stated that, France has to learn to live with terrorism.

Related: Nice, 14th of July Massacre: Towards Martial Law? The Islamic State (ISIS-Daesh) Claims Responsibility?

In this way, the security state is attempting to integrate terrorism as a day-to-day 24/7, 365 day per week agenda issue
which is said to require a hyper-militarized security state, just like Israel (notice how Israel is invoked by neoconservatives
and western Zionist supports ad nauseam in the security conversation), to deal with the threat.

This seems to be the cornerstone of Valls political relevance, which he has basically repeated over and over, for the better
part of the last two years despite the fact that both the Charlie Hebdo and Paris Bataclan events exhibited very clear signs
of GLADIO-style domestic terror stage play.

Back in February, at the Munich Security Conference he stated the exact same thing:

We have entered we all feel it a new era characterised by the lasting presence of hyper-terrorism.

We must be fully conscious of the threat, and react with a very great force and great lucidity. There will be
attacks. Large-scale attacks. Its a certainty. This hyper-terrorism is here to stay.
In January 2016, while addressing an Israeli lobby delegation, Valls read off a list of ISIS terrorist attacks along with other
terrorist incidents in Israel, claiming that this was proof that, we are in a world war, while not ever uttering a word about
Israels brutal, militarized occupation and their systematic ethnic cleansing regime waged against the native Palestinian
residents since the creation of the State of Israel in 1948.

Israeli CRIF spokesman Roger Cukierman applauded Vallss single-sided adherence to the Israeli lobby, by saying, On a
number of occasions, you said very powerful things: That anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, that France without its Jews is no
longer France, Cukierman said. This makes you a dear politician.

Is this a case of the state and its transnational security conglomerates manipulating the public into unquestioningly
accepting an indefinite siege mentality and a permanent, full-blown police state?

It appears once again, that we are witnessing an attempt to transform large parts of western society through a further
realignment of public and state political and economic priorities into what is commonly referred to as security
theatre, which, in reality, has nothing to do with actual security, and everything to do with domestic political and geopolitical
theatre.

Nice Terror Attack: What Theyre NOT Telling You

How many dead bodies on the streets of Europe will it take for leftists to realize that we are at war?

The Nice Terror Attack: Towards A Permanent State Of Emergency?


The death toll from the Nice attacks on the 14th of July, 2016 is rising. Latest reports suggest 84
deaths and possibly one hundred more injured. There have been reports of gunfire and the driver
of the truck which drove into the crowd near the beach in Nice is reported to have been shot dead.

Once again (as with the Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan attacks) there is no-one to stand trial and truthfully answer the
questions that need to be asked who and why?

At this point, there is not much that can be verified about the attack.

One cannot exclude the possibility that it may have simply been the action of an insane individual. Atrocities of that type are
rare but have happened in the past. But there is, however, the strong suggestion and indeed likelihood that this atrocity is a
terrorist attack by Islamists. So, what does all this mean?

French domestic intelligence (DGSI) chief Patrick Calvar warned on the 26th of June 2016 that an Islamist attack on
French children would be the trigger for a civil war. He said France was currently on the brink of that civil war.

Calvar also predicted that ISIS (Daesh) would use trucks as weapons. It is not unusual in the never-ending war on terror to
hear accurate predictions by intelligence officials before attacks, with the same officials seemingly powerless to prevent
them.
This uncanny coincidence could be the defining event of our time.

French Prime Minister, Manuel Valls is on record stating that the state of emergency in France would be permanent.

There has been increasing pressure on the Hollande regime in France to change course in the Middle East. Attempts to
reconcile with Russia and lift the sanctions have been blocked by Hollande and Valls.

I believe this is the trigger for a civil war French intelligence warned us about. The question is whether the war will become
high intensity or continue on a relatively low-intensity trajectory. There have been police whistleblowers in France who have
warned of huge caches of arms in major cities, capable of arming hundreds of thousands of men.

However, one must be cautious in referring to such whistleblowers as they have proven to be highly unreliable and may be
spreading disinformation.

In any case, the publics belief that we are in a state of war and that all military interventions abroad are therefore
necessary will be enough to make citizens look to the state for protection an oligarchic state which is currently
pursuing a brutal class war against workers.

As 90 percent or more of intelligence operations today involve media disinformation, we cannot possibly assume that any of
the reports we are hearing are accurate. However, it is hard to see how a psyop could have been carried out in the
Promenade des Anglais which is so central in Nice. What we can say for sure is that the attack serves the two constants of
the war on terror dialectic. The narrative would read as follows:

1. Make the state of emergency permanent, empowering the oligarchic state and further demoralising citizens by
dividing the working class along religious and racial lines. This is part of NATOs strategy of tension in accordance
with the longstanding intelligence operation Gladio. Citizens must turn to the anti-social state for security, thus
precluding social revolt.

2. Justify an all out attack on Syria to finish the job of destroying Arab civilisation, in accordance with US-NATO-
Israel geopolitical interests. Only the willfully ignorant could possibly believe that ISIS is an enemy of France when
the French have never had better relations with the country which openly backs them Saudi Arabia. The
intelligence reports, declassified documents and admissions of the highest officials of the French and American
governments all confirm that ISIS is Israels Arab legion.

Both those two above-mentioned goals serve the interests of US-NATO-Israel and until the French people liberate
themselves from its yoke, Zionism will continue to poison the minds of men, making them consent to policies that no honest
and compassionate human being would countenance.

An awakening of working-class militancy is occurring but the labour movement in France remains divided and led by social-
democratic reformists. Now, more than ever, seeing the link between terrorism and class war is essential if any political and
social change is to occur.

In an era of high-finance treason, oligarchy, austerity, and the triumph of avarice, terror increasingly becomes a feature of
the normal rather than an exceptional exercise of state power.

Top Israeli General Speaks Out Against Israels Crimes Against Palestinians +
Parallels Between Israel & 1930's Germany & Ten Facts Why Netanyahu Is A Criminal
And That Israel Is A Rogue State
July 12 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / GushShalom / GlobalResearch / Various

Top Israeli General Speaks Out Against Israels Crimes Against Palestinians.
General Golan, Deputy Chief of Staff of the Israeli Army, on Holocaust Memorial Day, said:

If there is something that frightens me about the memories of the Holocaust, it is the knowledge of the awful
processes which happened in Europe in general, and in Germany in particular, 70, 80, 90 years ago, and finding
traces of them here in our midst, today, in 2016.

Related: The Jewish Colonization of Palestine

Related: Roger Waters on Why More Artists Dont Speak Out Against Israel: Theyre Terrified

Israeli Uri Avnery, a former member of the Israeli parliament, who as a boy lived in Germany during the rise of the Nazis,
has come to the support of General Golan.

General Golan, who was slated to be the next Chief of Staff of the Israeli Army, and Uri Avnery, one of the bravest men on
the planet, are being demonized as self-hating Jews.

No one is permitted to mention any truth about Israels genocide against the Palestinians or the support for this
genocide by the two American political parties and presstitute media, not even former President Jimmy Carter.

When Carter mentioned the apartheid that characterizes present-day Israel in his book, the Jewish members of the Carter
Center resigned.

Uri Averny: I Was There

"Please Don't write about Ya'ir Golan!" a friend begged me, Anything a leftist like you writes will
only harm him!"
Uri Avnery

Related: The Hidden History Of The Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia [Illuminati Cabal Zionists...]

So I abstained for some weeks. But I can't keep quiet any longer.

General Ya'ir Golan, the deputy Chief of Staff of the Israeli army, made a speech on Holocaust Memorial Day. Wearing his
uniform, he read a prepared, well-considered text that triggered an uproar which has not yet died down.

Dozens of articles have been published in its wake, some condemning him, some lauding him. Seems that nobody could
stay indifferent.

The main sentence was: "If there is something that frightens me about the memories of the Holocaust, it is the knowledge of
the awful processes which happened in Europe in general, and in Germany in particular, 70, 80, 90 years ago, and finding
traces of them here in our midst, today, in 2016."

All hell broke loose. What! Traces of Nazism in Israel? A resemblance between what the Nazis did to us with what we are
doing to the Palestinians?
Related: Shymaa's story from GAZA - "We Are the Ones"

90 years ago was 1926, one of the last years of the German republic. 80 years ago was 1936, three years after the Nazis
came to power. 70 years ago was 1946, on the morrow of Hitler's suicide and the end of the Nazi Reich.

I feel compelled to write about the general's speech after all, because I was there.

As a child I was an eye-witness to the last years of the Weimar Republic (so called because its constitution was shaped in
Weimar, the town of Goethe and Schiller). As a politically alert boy I witnessed the Nazi Machtergreifung ("taking power")
and the first half a year of Nazi rule.

I know what Golan was speaking about. Though we belong to two different generations, we share the same background.
Both our families come from small towns in Western Germany. His father and I must have had a lot in common.

There is a strict moral commandment in Israel: nothing can be compared to the Holocaust. The Holocaust is
unique. It happened to us, the Jews, because we are unique. (Religious Jews would add: "Because God has chosen
us".)

I have broken this commandment. Just before Golan was born, I published (in Hebrew) a book called "The Swastika", in
which I recounted my childhood memories and tried to draw conclusions from them. It was on the eve of the Eichmann trial,
and I was shocked by the lack of knowledge about the Nazi era among young Israelis then.

My book did not deal with the Holocaust, which took place when I was already living in Palestine, but with a question which
troubled me throughout the years, and even today: how could it happen that Germany, perhaps the most cultured nation on
earth at the time, the homeland of Goethe, Beethoven and Kant, could democratically elect a raving psychopath like Adolf
Hitler as its leader?

The last chapter of the book was entitled "It Can Happen Here!" The title was drawn from a book by the American novelist
Sinclair Lewis, called ironically "It Can't Happen Here", in which he described a Nazi take-over of the United States.
In this chapter I discussed the possibility of a Jewish Nazi-like party coming to power in Israel. My conclusion was that a
Nazi party can come to power in any country on earth, if the conditions are right. Yes, in Israel, too.

The book was largely ignored by the Israeli public, which at the time was overwhelmed by the storm of emotions evoked by
the terrible disclosures of the Eichmann trial.

Now comes General Golan, an esteemed professional soldier, and says the same thing.

And not as an improvised remark, but on an official occasion, wearing his general's uniform, reading from a prepared, well
thought-out text. The storm broke out, and has not passed yet.

Israelis have a self-protective habit: when confronted with inconvenient truths, they evade its essence and deal with a
secondary, unimportant aspect. Of all the dozens and dozens of reactions in the written press, on TV and on political
platforms, almost none confronted the general's painful contention.

No, the furious debate that broke out concerns the questions: Is a high-ranking army officer allowed to voice an opinion
about matters that concern the civilian establishment? And do so in army uniform? On an official occasion?
Should an army officer keep quiet about his political convictions? Or voice them only in closed sessions - "in relevant
forums", as a furious Binyamin Netanyahu phrased it?

General Golan enjoys a very high degree of respect in the army. As Deputy Chief of Staff he was until now almost certainly
a candidate for Chief of Staff, when the incumbent leaves the office after the customary four years.

The fulfillment of this dream shared by every General Staff officer is now very remote. In practice, Golan has sacrificed his
further advancement in order to utter his warning and giving it the widest possible resonance.

One can only respect such courage. I have never met General Golan, I believe, and I don't know his political views. But I
admire his act.

(Somehow I recall an article published by the British magazine Punch before World War I, when a group of junior army
officers issued a statement opposing the government's policy in Ireland. The magazine said that while disapproving the
opinion expressed by the mutinous officers, it took pride in the fact that such youthful officers were ready to sacrifice their
careers for their convictions.)
The NAZI march to power started in 1929, when a terrible world-wide economic crisis hit Germany. A tiny, ridiculous far-right
party suddenly became a political force to be reckoned with. From there it took them four years to become the largest party
in the country and to take over power (though it still needed a coalition).

I was there when it happened, a boy in a family in which politics became the main topic at the dinner table. I saw how the
republic broke down, gradually, slowly, step by step. I saw our family friends hoisting the swastika flag. I saw my high-school
teacher raising his arm when entering the class and saying "Heil Hitler" for the first time (and then reassuring me in private
that nothing had changed.)

I was the only Jew in the entire gymnasium (high school.) When the hundreds of boys all taller than I raised their arms to
sing the Nazi anthem, and I did not, they threatened to break my bones if it happened again.

A few days later we left Germany for good.

General Golan was accused of comparing Israel to Nazi Germany. Nothing of the sort. A careful reading of his text shows
that he compared developments in Israel to the events that led to the disintegration of the Weimar Republic. And that is a
valid comparison.
Things happening in Israel, especially since the last election, bear a frightening similarity to those events. True, the process
is quite different. German fascism arose from the humiliation of surrender in World War I, the occupation of the Ruhr by
France and Belgium from 1923-25, the terrible economic crisis of 1929, the misery of millions of unemployed.

Israel is victorious in its frequent military actions, we live comfortable lives. The dangers threatening us are of a quite
different nature. They stem from our victories, not from our defeats.

Indeed, the differences between Israel today and Germany then are far greater than the similarities. But those similarities
do exist, and the general was right to point them out.

The discrimination against the Palestinians in practically all spheres of life can be compared to the treatment of the Jews in
the first phase of Nazi Germany. (The oppression of the Palestinians in the occupied territories resembles more the
treatment of the Czechs in the "protectorate" after the Munich betrayal.)
The rain of racist bills in the Knesset, those already adopted and those in the works, strongly resembles the laws adopted by
the Reichstag in the early days of the Nazi regime. Some rabbis call for a boycott of Arab shops. Like then. The call "Death
to the Arabs" ("Judah verrecke"?) is regularly heard at soccer matches.

A member of parliament has called for the separation between Jewish and Arab newborns in hospital.

A Chief Rabbi has declared that Goyim (non-Jews) were created by God to serve the Jews.

Our Ministers of Education and Culture are busy subduing the schools, theater and arts to the extreme rightist line,
something known in German as Gleichschaltung. The Supreme Court, the pride of Israel, is being relentlessly attacked by
the Minister of Justice. The Gaza Strip is a huge ghetto.

Of course, no one in their right mind would even remotely compare Netanyahu to the Fuehrer, but there are political
parties here which do emit a strong fascist smell.

The political riffraff peopling the present Netanyahu government could easily have found their place in the first Nazi
government.
One of the main slogans of our present government is to replace the "old elite", considered too liberal, with a new one. One
of the main Nazi slogans was to replace "das System".

By the way, when the Nazis came to power, almost all high-ranking officers of the German army were staunch anti-Nazis.
They were even considering a putsch against Hitler.

Their political leader was summarily executed a year later, when Hitler liquidated his opponents in his own party.
We are told that General Golan is now protected by a personal bodyguard, something that has never happened to a
general in the annals of Israel.

The general did not mention the occupation and the settlements, which are under army rule. But he did mention the episode
which occurred shortly before he gave this speech, and which is still shaking Israel now: in occupied Hebron, under army
rule, a soldier saw a seriously wounded Palestinian lying helplessly on the ground, approached him and killed him with a
shot to the head.

The victim had tried to attack some soldiers with a knife, but did not constitute a threat to anyone any more. This was a clear
contravention of army standing orders, and the soldier has been hauled before a court martial.
A cry went up around the country: the soldier is a hero! He should be decorated! Netanyahu called his father to assure him
of his support. Avigdor Lieberman entered the crowded courtroom in order to express his solidarity with the soldier. A few
days later Netanyahu appointed Lieberman as Minister of Defense, the second most important office in Israel.

Before that, General Golan received robust support both from the Minister of Defense, Moshe Ya'alon, and the Chief of
Staff, Gadi Eisenkot. Probably this was the immediate reason for the kicking out of Ya'alon and the appointment of
Lieberman in his place. It resembled a putsch.

It seems that Golan is not only a courageous officer, but a prophet, too. The inclusion of Lieberman's party in the
government coalition confirms

Golan's blackest fears. This is another fatal blow to the Israeli democracy. Am I condemned to witness the same process for
the second time in my life?

It is this incident that aroused the general to speak out and warn the country. I can only salute him.
Related: ISIS is a US-Israeli Creation: Top Ten Indications

Related: The West has a terrorist "catch and release" program, admits proxy army is geopolitical strategy

Ten Facts Why Netanyahu Is A Criminal And That Israel Is A Rogue State

All of the following facts are verifiable in the public domain:


1. Netanyahu heads the only undeclared nuclear weapons entity on the planet yet still ludicrously alleges that non
nuclear Iran is trying to exterminate the state of Israel with its 100s of warheads in its Dimona secret arsenal, (all of which
are outside the inspection of the IAEA), in an abortive effort to damage the agreed Iran peace deal, painstakingly negotiated
by the UN Security Council members and the EU. His convoluted political machinations, in Washington and Europe, have
resulted in ignominious failure as Iran rejoins the international community.

2. His government also refuses to be a party to both the Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions (CWC /
BWC) to which all EU members and most other UN states are signatories

3. His rightwing, extremist government supports the continued illegal occupation and settlement of the Palestinian
West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights in violation of international law, in addition to continuing a blockade of
essential materials to 1.8 million in Gaza that has received global condemnation.

4. He exerts a wholly undemocratic influence over the Republican AIPAC dominated US congress in Washington thereby
disproportionately skewing American foreign policy in favour of Israel

5. His family background includes a documented association with terrorist organisations notably the Irgun Zvai Leumi
paramilitaries

6. His government is in continued breach of the human rights provisions of the EU Association Agreement that affords Israel
free trade access to the European single market

7. He allows the socalled pricetag terrorists to continue to persecute Arab residents in the Occupied Territories by the
burning and destruction of olive groves and businesses in a program of uncontrolled intimidation and violence

8. He continually threatens to restrict access to Jerusalems Al Aqsa mosque as did his failed predecessor, Ariel Sharon,
apparently in a bid to provoke violence and dissent

9. He is the leader of a party whose published charter requires the ethnic cleansing of all indigenous Palestinians in
order to establish a Greater Israel in all of former Palestine
10. Likuds official agenda to establish the socalled facts on the ground is a blatant attempt to abort the establishment of an
independent Palestinian state. This illegal program has recently been condemned by China as well as by the EU, Russia
and the US and is now expected to lead to economic, political and sporting sanctions.

How George Soros Singlehandedly Created The European Refugee Crisis - And Why
July 11 2016 | From: GarretGalland

Rothschild bag man George Soros could seamlessly step into the role as the real-life version of a
super-villain in a James Bond novel. To give credit where credit is due, Stephen did the
considerable leg work for this article and what he uncovered surprised even me.
George Soros is trading again. The 85-year-old political activist and philanthropist hit the headlines post-Brexit
saying the event had unleashed a financial-market crisis.

Related: George Soros: A Psychopaths Psychopath

Well, the crisis hasnt hit Soros just yet. He was once again on the right side of the trade, taking a short position in troubled
Deutsche Bank and betting against the S&P via a 2.1-million-share put option on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF.

More interestingly, Soros recently took out a $264 million position in Barrick Gold, whose share price has jumped over 14%
since Brexit. Along with this trade, Soros has sold his positions in many of his traditional holdings.

Soros had recently announced he was coming out of retirement, again.


Click on the image above to see Soros lates trades online

First retiring in 2000, the only other time Soros has publicly re-entered the markets was in 2007, when he placed a number of
bearish bets on US housing and ultimately made a profit of over $1 billion from the trades.

Since the 1980s, Soros has actively been pursuing a globalist agenda; he advances this agenda through his Open Society
Foundations (OSF).

What is this globalist agenda, and where does it come from?

The Humble Beginnings

The globalist seed was sowed for young George by his father, Tivadar, a Jewish lawyer who was a strong proponent of
Esperanto. Esperanto is a language created in 1887 by L.L. Zamenhof, a Polish eye doctor, for the purpose of transcending
national borders and overcoming the natural indifference of mankind.

Tivadar taught young George Esperanto and forced him to speak it at home. In 1936, as Hitler was hosting the Olympics in
Berlin, Tivadar changed the family name from Schwartz to Soros, an Esperanto word meaning will soar.

George Soros, who was born and raised in Budapest, Hungary, benefited greatly from his fathers decision.

Allegedly, in 1944, 14-year-old George Soros went to work for the invading Nazis. It is said that until the end of the war in
1945, he worked with a government official, helping him confiscate property from the local Jewish population.

In an 1998 interview with 60 Minutes, Soros described the year of German occupation as the happiest time in my life.

Soross Venture into Finance

When the war ended, Soros moved to London and in 1947 enrolled in the London School of Economics where he studied
under Karl Popper, the Austrian-British philosopher who was one of the first proponents of an Open Society.
Soros then worked at several merchant banks in London before moving to New York in 1963. In 1970, he founded Soros
Fund Management and in 1973 created the Quantum Fund in partnership with investor Jim Rogers.

The fund made annual returns of over 30%, cementing Soross reputation and putting him in a position of powerone he
utilizes to this day to advance the agenda of his mentors.

The Currency Speculations That Threw Britain and Asia into Crisis

In the 1990s, Soros began a string of large bets against national currencies. The first was in 1992, when he sold short the
pound sterling and made a $1 billion profit in a single day.

His next big currency speculation came in 1997. This time Soros singled out the Thai baht and, with heavy short-selling
volume, destroyed the bahts artificial peg to the US dollar, which started the Asian financial crisis.

Humanitarian Efforts

Today, Soross net worth stands at $23 billion. Since taking a back seat in his company, Soros Fund Management, in 2000,
Soros has been focusing on his philanthropic efforts, which he carries out through the Open Society Foundations he founded
in 1993.
So who does he donate to, and what causes does he support?

During the 1980s and 1990s, Soros used his extraordinary wealth to bankroll and fund revolutions in dozens of European
nations, including Czechoslovakia, Croatia, and Yugoslavia. He achieved this by funneling money to political opposition
parties, publishing houses, and independent media in these nations.

If you wonder why Soros meddled in these nations affairs, part of the answer may lie in the fact that during and after the
chaos, he invested heavily in assets in each of the respective countries.

He then used Columbia University economist Jeffrey Sachs to advise the fledgling governments to privatize all public assets
immediately, thus allowing Soros to sell the assets he had acquired during the turmoil into newly formed open markets.

Having succeeded in advancing his agenda in Europe through regime change - and profiting in the process - he soon turned
his attention to the big stage, the United States.

The Big Time

In 2004, Soros stated;

"I deeply believe in the values of an open society. For the past 15 years I have been focusing my efforts abroad;
now I am doing it in the United States.

Since then, Soros has been funding groups such as:

The American Institute for Social Justice, whose aim is to transform poor communities through lobbying for increased
government spending on social programs

The New America Foundation, whose aim is to influence public opinion on such topics as environmentalism and global
governance

The Migration Policy Institute, whose aim is to bring about an illegal immigrant resettlement policy and increase social
welfare benefits for illegals
Soros also uses his Open Society Foundations to funnel money to the progressive media outlet, Media Matters.

Soros funnels the money through a number of leftist groups, including the Tides Foundation, Center for American Progress,
and the Democracy Alliance in order to circumvent the campaign finance laws he helped lobby for.

Why has Soros donated so much capital and effort to these organizations? For one simple reason: to buy political power.

Democratic politicians who go against the progressive narrative will see their funding cut and be attacked in media outlets
such as Media Matters, which also directly contribute to mainstream sites such as NBC, Al Jazeera, and The New York
Times.
Apart from the $5 billion Soross foundation has donated to groups like those cited above, he has also made huge
contributions to the Democratic Party and its most prominent members, like Joe Biden, Barack Obama, and of course Bill and
Hillary Clinton.

Best Friends with the Clintons

Soross relationship with the Clintons goes back to 1993, around the time when OSF was founded. They have become close
friends, and their enduring relationship goes well beyond donor status.

According to the book, The Shadow Party, by Horowitz and


Poe, at a 2004 Take Back America conference where
Soros was speaking, the former first lady introduced him
saying;

"[W]e need people like George Soros, who is


fearless and willing to step up when it counts.

Soros began supporting Hillary Clintons current presidential


run in 2013, taking a senior role in the Ready for Hillary
group.

Since then, Soros has donated over $15 million to pro-


Clinton groups and Super PACs.

More recently, Soros has given more than $33 million to the
Black Lives Matter group, which has been involved in
outbreaks of social unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, and
Baltimore, Maryland, in 2015.

Both of these incidents contributed to a worsening of race


relations across America.

The same group heavily criticized Democratic contender


Bernie Sanders for his alleged track record of supporting
racial inequality, helping to undercut him as a competitive
threat with one of Hillary Clintons most ardent
constituencies.

This, of course, greatly enhances the clout Soros wields through the groups mentioned above. It is safe to assume that he is
now able to drive Democratic policy, especially in an administration headed by Hillary Clinton.

Simply, what Soros wants, he gets. And its clear from his history that he wants to smudge away national borders and create
the sort of globalist nightmare represented by the European Union.
In recent years, Soros has turned his attention back to Europe. Is it a coincidence that the continent is currently in economic
and social disarray?

Another Home Run: the Ukrainian Conflict

Theres no doubt about Soross great influence on US foreign policy. In an October 1995 PBS interview with Charlie Rose, he
said, I do now have access [to US Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott]. There is no question. We actually work together
[on Eastern European policy].

Soross meddling reared its ugly head again in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which began in early 2014.

In a May 2014 interview with CNN, Soros stated he was responsible for establishing a foundation in the Ukraine that
ultimately led to the overthrow of the countrys elected leader and the installation of a junta handpicked by the US State
Department, at the time headed by none other than Hillary Clinton:

CNN Host: First on Ukraine, one of the things that many people recognized about you was that you during the
revolutions of 1989 funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in Eastern Europe and Poland, the
Czech Republic. Are you doing similar things in Ukraine?

Soros: Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia. And the foundation
has been functioning ever since and played an important part in events now.
The war that ripped through the Ukrainian region of Donbass resulted in the deaths of over 10,000 people and the
displacement of over 1.4 million people. As collateral damage, a Malaysia Airlines passenger jet was shot down, killing all 298
on board.

But once again Soros was there to profit from the chaos he helped create. His prize in Ukraine was the state-owned energy
monopoly Naftogaz.

Soros again had his US cronies, Secretary of the Treasury Jack Lew and US consulting company McKinsey, advise the
puppet government of Ukraine to privatize Naftogaz.

Although Soross exact stake in Naftogaz has not been disclosed, in a 2014 memo he pledged to invest up to $1 billion in
Ukrainian businesses, but no other Ukrainian holdings have since been reported.

His Latest Success: The European Refugee Crisis

Soross agenda is fundamentally about the destruction of national borders. This has recently been shown very clearly with his
funding of the European refugee crisis.
The refugee crisis has been blamed on the civil war currently raging in Syria. But did you ever wonder how all these
people suddenly knew Europe would open its gates and let them in?

The refugee crisis is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. It coincided with OSF donating money to the US-based Migration
Policy Institute and the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants, both Soros-sponsored
organizations.

Both groups advocate the resettlement of third-world Muslims into Europe.

In 2015, a Sky News reporter found Migrant Handbooks on the Greek island of Lesbos. It was later revealed that the
handbooks, which are written in Arabic, had been given to refugees before crossing the Mediterranean by a group
called Welcome to the EU.

Welcome to the EU is funded by - you guessed it - the Open Society Foundations.

Soros has not only backed groups that advocate the resettlement of third-world migrants into Europe, he in fact is the
architect of the Merkel Plan.
The massive Muslim integration into Europe is a Trojan Horse plan

The Merkel Plan was created by the European Stability Initiative whose chairman Gerald Knaus is a senior fellow at none
other than the Open Society Foundations.

Related: Atlantic Puppeteers: Who is Behind 'The Merkel Plan' and EU Refugee Policy

The plan proposes that Germany should grant asylum to 500,000 Syrian refugees. It also states that Germany, along with
other European nations, should agree to help Turkey, a country thats 98% Muslim, gain visa-free travel within the EU starting
in 2016.

Political Discourse

The refugee crisis has raised huge concern in European countries like Hungary. In response to 7,000 migrants entering
Hungarian territory per day in 2015, the Hungarian government reestablished border control in order to keep the hordes of
refugees from entering the country.
Of course this did not go down well with Soros and his close allies, the Clintons.

Bill Clinton has since come out and accused both Poland and Hungary of thinking democracy is too much trouble and
wanting to have a Putin-like authoritarian dictatorship.

Seeing through Clintons comments, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbn responded by saying:

"The remarks made about Hungary and Poland have a political dimension. These are not accidental slips of the
tongue.

And these slips or remarks have been multiplying since we are living in the era of the migrant crisis.

And we all know that behind the leaders of the Democratic Party, we have to see George Soros.

He went on to say that although the mouth belongs to Clinton, the voice belongs to Soros.

Soros has since said of Orbns policy toward the migrants:

His plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees as an obstacle.

Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.

Its hard to imagine that he could be any clearer in his globalist intentions.

Related: Shots Fired: Wikileaks Accuses Panama Papers' Leaker Of Being "Soros-Funded, Soft-Power Tax Dodge" +
Rothschild's Primer: How To Launder Money In U.S. Real Estate And Avoid "Blacklists"
The Profit Motive

So why is Soros going to such lengths to flood Europe with hordes of third-world Muslims? We cant be sure, but it has
recently come to light that Soros has taken a large series of bearish derivative positions against US stocks. Apparently, he
thinks that causing chaos in Europe will spread the contagion to the United States, thus sending US markets spiraling
downward.

The destruction of Europe through flooding it with millions of unassimilated Muslims is a direct plan to cause
economic and social chaos on the Continent.

Another example of turmoil equaling profit for George Soros, who seems to have his tentacles in most geopolitical events.

We all understand correlation is not causation. However, given Soross extraordinary wealth, political connections, and his
long track record of seeing and profiting from chaos, he is almost certainly a catalyst for much of the geopolitical turmoil now
occurring.

He is intent on destroying national borders and creating a global governance structure with unlimited powers.

From his comments directed toward Viktor Orbn, we can see he clearly views national leaders as his juniors, expecting them
to become puppets that sell his narrative to the ignorant masses.

Soros sees himself as a missionary carrying out the globalist agenda taught to him by his early mentors. He uses his vast
political connections to influence government policy and create crises, both economic and social, to further this agenda.

By all appearances, Soros is conspiring against humanity and is hell-bent on the destruction of Western
democracies.

To any rational thinker, some global events just dont make sense. Why, for example, would Western democracies take in
millions of people whose values are completely incompatible with their own?

When we look closely at the agenda being actively promoted by the leading globalist puppet master, George Soros, things
become a little clearer.
On Soros & Gold

There is a naturally occurring and constant collaboration about shared interests occurring amongst the heads of governments,
corporations, investment managers and all of the bottom feeders that survive off their scraps.

What is so interesting about Soros is that he is so obvious in his intentions and persistent in their pursuit. Given the
consequences of his actions, it is also clear hes a believer in moral relativism and that the ends justify the means.

That he turns a nice buck in his crusade for what certainly rhymes with a one-world government is a Soros hallmark.

It allows me the money needed to fund my philanthropies he might answer to the charges he is profiting from blood in the
streets he was instrumental in spilling.

Going forward when something big is happening geopolitically, I am going to start my analysis by checking under rocks for
signs of Soros.

At the beginning of this article we noted that Soros has gone big into American Barrick (ABX), a leading gold producer. As of
the end of March it was his single largest holding at 7.36% of his overall portfolio.

As telling, he has dumped a lot of his more conventional stocks in recent months.

Related: George Soros Sells All Shares Of Citigroup, Bank Of America And JP Morgan
Given the mans inside track and active manipulations you might want to take the hint and pick up some physical gold as
an insurance policy against a systematic shock.

If you already own gold, I probably wouldnt chase it here as it has had a good run of late. Ditto silver which is up 46% year to
date. But if you dont own some, adding precious metals to your portfolio as a long-term holding, even at todays prices,
makes sense.

As always with gold shares, it is important to remember a few things:

In most cases, these are speculations. Thats because their financial metrics often dont line up with anything looking like
a good value. What you are really betting on is a revaluation of the ounces of gold or silver a company is sitting on. Thus, if a
company is sitting on one million ounces of gold and gold goes up by $100, the company just got a lot more valuable.

Never fall in love with a gold stock. Set a rational return goal and once hit, at least scrape your original investment off the
table. That way you are playing with the casinos money.

Also per my article last week, keep in mind that should gold stocks buck the trend in a future global equities correction, the
money managers who own big positions in gold stocks will almost certainly dump their holdings in order to dress up the rest of
their portfolios. As the trading volume in precious metals share is relatively thin, you want to beat them out the door.

Embrace the volatility. The low trading volume of most of these stocks is a key reason they have such explosive upside.
Any significant uptick in investor interest can send a stock soaring.

Here Come the Clowns

Nothing comes close to the Get Out of Jail card handed by the clowns at the FBI to Hillary over her private email servers. This
despite pretty much no one disputes she broke any number of federal laws of the sort which would have landed a lesser
clown in jail.
To quote FBI Director James Comey;

"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information,
our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.

There is nuance in that statement. For starters, that there is evidence of violations. But also the stark political reality that no
reasonable prosecutor would enforce the laws, considering who the perp is: the standard bearer for the Democrats going
into this election.

Besides, going after Clinton means crossing swords with Soros and no reasonable prosecutor would want to do that.

Related: Wikileaks Asks If This Is The "Smoking Gun" Email That Will Bring Down Hillary + The Full List Of 92
Paychecks Hillary Collected From Wall Street

Why Did The Dallas Shootings Really Happen?


July 10 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / Various

Is the Dallas police shooting a false flag affair in behalf of gun control? Is it the result of a war
veteran suffering from post traumatic stress disorder? Is the shooting the beginning of retribution
for thousands of wanton police murders of US citizens in the 21st century? Or is there some other
explanation?

We will never know. The perpetrator is dead. The authorities will tell us whatever suits the purposes of authority.
Related: Dallas Shootings: White Supremacists Succeeded in Provoking Black Extremism

Related: If the Shooting of Dallas Police Surprises You, You Havent Been Paying Attention

Related: Culprits Behind Dallas Police Massacre Revealed

We could say that the police have brought this on themselves by their undisciplined and violent behavior toward the public.
On the other hand, we can hold the police chiefs, the police unions, the mayors and city councils, the governors,
prosecutors, and the Justice (sic) Department responsible for failure to hold accountable those cops who murder and
commit gratuitous violence against the public.

When police execute someone, the excuse is always something like this: He reached under his shirt to his waistband. I
thought he had a gun. I didnt want to leave my children fatherless and my wife a widow. The murdered victims wife and
children, if any, are of no consequence.

Conservatives, especially those taught to be fearful of crime, have scant objection to police murders. Their view is
always: The police wouldnt have shot him without cause. The same bias in favor of the police is why conservative jurors
always convict.

The liberals tend to interpret the shootings as racism, so they want to combat racism.

The real problem is that public authorities do not protect the public from gratuitous violence. Therefore, hatred and
disrespect for the police are growing. Routine murders by policeseveral each day, almost all of which go
unpunishedare generating the kind of anger that causes people to snap and to reply to violence with violence.

If the criminal justice system applied also to the police, the police would think twice before they wantonly murder.

Being a police officer is not supposed to be risk free. A police officer should be concerned about the public, not merely his
own family. We cannot accept gratuitous police violence on the grounds that the officers behavior is dictated by his
concerns for his own family. If an officer cannot accept the risks of being a police officer, he should find a different
occupation.

Police violence is out of control because mayors, prosecutors, and governors are failing the public by refusing to put a halt
to it. According to conservatives, punishment deters crime, but they do not apply this to the police.

Police violence is also out of control because of the revolution in police training which teaches police to protect themselves
and to subdue the suspect regardless of cost. A number of former police officers have written to me that the reason they
gave up the occupation is that today police are being trained to be killers like soldiers.

If a former police officer or someone knowledgeable about this training would describe it and its history, where it originated
and why, I will post it on the website.

Who is Really Responsible for the Shooting?


Black Lives Matter is a domestic terrorist organization that has been given legitimacy by the media and the Obama
administration.

Related: Black Power Group Claims Responsibility for Killing Police in Dallas

Exposed: The Invasion Of Iraq Took Place Under False Pretences


July 9 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / Various

More Obscuration From The British Establishment: Sir John Chilcot, a member of the British
establishment and also a member of the Butler Inquiry, the responsibility of which was to
determine if the so-called intelligence used as the excuse for the US/UK invasion of Saddam
Husseins Iraq was fixed to justify the invasion, has, after seven years of delay, finally issued its
report.
Remember, there was a leaked memo from the head of British intelligence that the intelligence justifying the Iraqi
Invasion was fixed or orchestrated to produce the justification for the invasion, a war crime under the Nuremberg
standard established by the United States.

Related: Invasion of Iraq, The Secret Downing Street Memo: Intelligence and Facts were being Fixed

Chilcots job was to make this fact go away or assume less importance and to protect the Butler Inquirys orchestrated
verdict that, despite the word of the head of British intelligence, the intelligence was not fixed.

In other words, Sir Johns assigned task under the guise of an impartial inquiry was to absolve former UK PM and war
criminal Tony Blair not of all responsibility but of all responsibility deserving of prosecution.
Sir Johns report is akin to FBI director Comeys report on Hillary: They did it but they didnt do it enough to be prosecuted.

Related: Crimes Against Peace: The Chilcot Inquiry, Tony Blair and Iraq

Related: The Truth About Chilcot: The Inquiry, Whos Who?

In the context of democratic politics, if such existed in England, Tony Blair would be in the crosshairs of the ruling UK party,
the Tories or Conservatives. Yet, as both parties represent the same private interest groups, the Conservative Prime
Minister, David Cameron, who has announced his resignation effective next October, rushed to the opposition partys
defense and gave in Parliament what former British Ambassador Craig Murray calls a;

"Dishonest, apologia for the invasion that bore no relationship to the Chilcot report.

The UK media, for the most part, also came out in defense of Tony Blair, the war criminal and liar, providing, according to
Amb. Murray;

"Uunlimited airtime to Blair and his defender Alastair Campbell and almost no airtime to those who campaigned
against the war.

Here is the judgement of a British Ambassador, Craig Murray:

Blair is still a creature of absolute self-serving slime.


You could make the same judgment on almost every member of the Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama regimes.

And Hillarys regime would be even worse. My prediction is that life on earth would not survive Hillarys first term.

Related Articles:

Is the Coup Against Corbyn a Plot to Spare Tony Blair from War Crimes Probe?

ICC Wont Try Blair for War Crimes In Spite of Damning Chilcot Report, Heres Why

Tariq Ali on Chilcot Iraq Report: Tony Blair is a War Criminal for Pushing Us into Illegal War

Behind the Headlines: Britain's Secret Wars: Interview with T.J. Coles

Chilcot, Israel and the Lobby

From Winston Churchill to Tony Blair: How British Leaders Destroyed Iraq for over a Century

WikiLeaks Rolls Out Archive Of Over 1,200 Clinton Iraq War Emails: FBI
Recommends "No Charges" Against Hillary Clinton
July 7 2016 | From: RT / ZeroHedge / Various

Surprise, surprise. The establisment want Hitlery in office no matter what. In a surprising
statement, FBI director James Comey announced that Federal officials have decided not to pursue
federal charges against Hillary Clinton for her private email setup, an announcement that will send
a shockwave throughout national politics.
The now-infamous whistleblowing website has published an archive of what is said to be over 1,200 of Hillary
Clinton's private emails pertaining to the Iraq War. Julian Assange previously said that the release would be
enough to indict her.

Related: Trump Launches LyingCrookedHillary.com + A Clinton Expose

On Monday, WikiLeaks tweeted a link to a search aggregate of 1,258 emails that Clinton wrote or received discussing US
engagement in Iraq while she headed the State Department. The Iraq War email bundle is part of a trove of Clinton's
correspondence that was released by the State Department in February, under the Freedom of Information Act..

In March, WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive consisting of 30,322 emails from Hillary Clintons private email server
that she used while serving as Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents cover Clinton's correspondence from 30
June 2010 to 12 August 2014. Out of that number, 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton.

The use of private email for state-run business has become a thorn in the side of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.
With Democratic convention just weeks away, the public eye is following a close watch of a potential grand jury indictment.

Related: After FBI grilling, Hillary Clinton calls husband's chat with Attorney General 'chance meeting'

This past weekend, the FBI spent more than three hours questioning Clinton about the email scandal, but as elections loom,
the Bureau has yet to issue a report on its findings.

It has been a year since inspectors general from the State Department and federal intelligence agencies referred the case of
Clintons server to the Justice Department last July.

The FBI questioning fell days after it was reported that former president Bill Clinton had held talks with Attorney General
Loretta Lynch, responsible for the governments investigation of Hillary Clintons emails. Clinton denied that her husband's
meeting with Lynch had anything to do with the email investigation.

Many believe that the former Secretary of State will not be indicted for her use of private email.
"Thats just not going to happen," Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey, told CNN's State of the Union program
Sunday. "Thats something that, to me, is not within the realm of possibility."

"I am not worried about it," Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown told ABCs This Week on Sunday.

"There will not be an indictment, and that means she did what many secretaries of state have done in the past."

Prior to Monday's release, the founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange warned that "upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary
Clinton" would be enough to indict her.

"We've accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton. We could proceed to an indictment," Assange told ITV.

Yet at the same time, the whistleblower said that despite overwhelming evidence calling for an indictment, Lynch will
never proceed with the charges.

Related: Americans React With Fury: If Hillary Doesnt Follow the Law, Why Should I?

FBI Recommends "No Charges" Against Hillary Clinton


FBI director James Comey announced that Federal officials have decided not to pursue federal
charges against Hillary Clinton for her private email setup, an announcement that will send a
shockwave throughout national politics.
What is shocking is Comey's admission that Clinton used not one but several different email servers, adding that 110
emails contained classified information and 8 contained top secret information, he also reported that Clinton did
not turn over "several thousand" emails to the FBI and added that due to Hillary's sloppy set up, it is possible that
"hostile actors" got access to Clinton's emails.

Related: Why Hillary Clinton Won't Allow Her Corporate Speeches to be Published

Yet, despite all these "facts", the FBI has decided not to proceed with recommending charges.

It appears that the FBI is implying that the only reason why no charges will be filed is because there was no "intent", and yet
according to the US criminal code, specifically U.S. Code Section 793 - "Gathering, transmitting or losing defense
information" subsection (f), intent in this case is not required for prosection:

"Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal
book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or
information, relating to the national defense,

(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to
anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or

(2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to
anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such
loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer

- Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."

As the Hill adds, the juxtaposition is likely to inflame White House critics, who have insisted that political pressures would
prevent any chance of an indictment for Clinton, regardless of the damage to national security. Obama has previously
weighed in to dismiss concerns about the investigation - to the ire of Republicans and federal investigators.

Last week, Attorney General Loretta Lynch said that she would defer judgment to the FBI and career Justice
Department prosecutors, following a private and extremely controversial 30-minute meeting with former President
Bill Clinton.
The decision left Comey as the public face of the investigation, in what some viewed as an opportunity for the hard-nosed
maverick to buck political pressures and act against Clinton.

It is impossible for the FBI not to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton,her presumptive
general election opponent, Donald Trump, said on Twitter this weekend.

What she did was wrong! What Bill did was stupid!

The FBI began its probe connected to Clinton last summer, when inspectors general at the State Department and federal
intelligence agencies referred Clinton's "homebrew" email arrangement to the Justice Department for review. The bespoke
setup might have jeopardized sensitive national secrets, investigators warned.

Roughly one-in-15 of the work-related messages that Clinton sent or received on the private server have been classified at
some level, according to the trove of 30,000 emails that she handed over to the State Department. Twenty-two emails were
classified as top secret - the highest level of secrecy.

In May, the State Department's inspector general released a scathing report claiming that Clinton had never asked to use
the unconventional setup while in office, and that the request would have been denied if she had. Comey has been under
the gun to finalize the investigation before the presidential nominating conventions later this month.

While the FBI director has insisted that he had no deadline to complete the probe, a delay past the end of the month would
have been interpreted as a sign of trouble for her campaign.

Some of the initial reactions were less then excited by the FBI's admission that while Clinton may have been "extremely
careless" she did not commit a crime:

Read more at: ZeroHedge

Related Articles:
Attorneys, Media Dumbfounded Hillary Got Off; Obama Says No one is more qualified To Be President

What Is Hillary Clinton Hiding?

Trump: On Nov. 8, Hillary Will Pay for her Sins

Heres why FBI didnt Indict Hillary Clinton

Trump Ad Features Comey Exposing Hillarys Lies

The Hunter: He Was A Hacker For The NSA And He Was Willing To Talk - I Was Willing
To Listen
July 5 2016 | From: TheIntercept

The message arrived at night and consisted of three words: Good evening sir! The sender was a
hacker who had written a series of provocative memos at the National Security Agency.

His secret memos had explained - with an earthy use of slang and emojis that was unusual for an operative of the
largest eavesdropping organization in the world - how the NSA breaks into the digital accounts of people who
manage computer networks, and how it tries to unmask people who use Tor to browse the web anonymously.

Outlining some of the NSAs most sensitive activities, the memos were leaked by Edward Snowden, and I had written about
a few of them for The Intercept.

There is no Miss Manners for exchanging pleasantries with a man the government has trained to be the digital equivalent of
a Navy SEAL. Though I had initiated the contact, I was wary of how he might respond.

The hacker had publicly expressed a visceral dislike for Snowden and had accused The Intercept of jeopardizing lives by
publishing classified information. One of his memos outlined the ways the NSA reroutes (or shapes) the internet traffic of
entire countries, and another memo was titled I Hunt Sysadmins. I felt sure he could hack anyones computer, including
mine.

The only NSA workers the agency has permitted me to talk with are the ones in its public affairs office who tell me I
cannot talk with anyone else. Thanks to the documents leaked by Snowden, however, I have been able to write
about a few characters at the NSA.
There was, for instance, a novelist-turned-linguist who penned an ethics column for the NSAs in-house newsletter, and
there was a mid-level manager who wrote an often zany advice column called Ask Zelda! But their classified writings, while
revealing, could not tell me everything I wanted to know about the mindset of the men and women who spy on the world for
the U.S. government.

I got lucky with the hacker, because he recently left the agency for the cybersecurity industry; it would be his choice to talk,
not the NSAs. Fortunately, speaking out is his second nature. While working for the NSA, he had publicly written about his
religious beliefs, and he was active on social media.

So I replied to his greeting and we began an exchange of cordial messages. He agreed to a video chat that turned into a
three-hour discussion sprawling from the ethics of surveillance to the downsides of home improvements and the difficulty of
securing your laptop.

"I suppose why I talk is partially a personal compulsion to not necessarily reconcile two sides or different
viewpoints but to just try to be honest about the way things are, he told me. Does that make sense?

The hacker was at his home, wearing a dark hoodie that bore the name of one of his favorite heavy metal bands, Lamb of
God. I agreed not to use his name in my story, so Ill just refer to him as the Lamb. I could see a dime-store bubble-gum
machine behind him, a cat-scratching tree, and attractive wood beams in the ceiling.

But his home was not a tranquil place. Workmen were doing renovations, so the noise of a buzz saw and hammering
intruded, his wife called him on the phone, and I could hear the sound of barking. Sorry, my cats are taunting my dog, he
said, and later the animal in question, a black-and-white pit bull, jumped onto his lap and licked his face.

The Lamb wore a T-shirt under his hoodie and florid tattoos on his arms and smiled when I said, mostly in jest, that his
unruly black beard made him look like a member of the Taliban, though without a turban. He looked very hacker, not very
government.
When most of us think of hackers, we probably dont think of government hackers. It might even seem odd that hackers
would want to work for the NSA - and that the NSA would want to employ them. But the NSA employs legions of hackers, as
do other agencies, including the FBI, CIA, DEA, DHS, and Department of Defense.

Additionally, there are large numbers of hackers in the corporate world, working for military contractors like Booz Allen,
SAIC, and Palantir. The reason is elegantly simple: You cannot hack the world without hackers.

In popular shows and movies such as Mr. Robot and The Matrix, hackers tend to be presented as unshaven
geeks loosely connected to collectives like Anonymous, or to Romanian crime syndicates that steal credit cards by
the millions, or they are teenagers who dont realize their online mischief will get them into a boatload of trouble
when Mom finds out.

The stereotypes differ in many ways but share a trait: They are transgressive anti-authoritarians with low regard for social
norms and laws. You would not expect these people to work for The Man, but they do, in droves. If you could poll every
hacker in the U.S. and ask whether they practice their trade in dark basements or on official payrolls, a large number would
likely admit to having pension plans. Who knows, it could be the majority.

This may qualify as one of the quietest triumphs for the U.S. government since 9/11: It has co-opted the skills and ideals of a
group of outsiders whose anti-establishment tilt was expressed two decades ago by Matt Damon during a
famous scene in Good Will Hunting. Damon, playing a math genius being recruited by the NSA, launches into a scathing riff
about the agency serving the interests of government and corporate evil rather than ordinary people.
Sure, he could break a code for the NSA and reveal the location of a rebel group in North Africa or the Middle East, but the
result would be a U.S. bombing attack in which 1,500 people that I never met, never had a problem with, get killed. He
turns down the offer.

In recent years, two developments have helped make hacking for the government a lot more attractive than hacking for
yourself. First, the Department of Justice has cracked down on freelance hacking, whether it be altruistic or malignant. If the
DOJ doesnt like the way you hack, you are going to jail.

Meanwhile, hackers have been warmly invited to deploy their transgressive impulses in service to the homeland, because
the NSA and other federal agencies have turned themselves into licensed hives of breaking into other peoples computers.
For many, its a techno sandbox of irresistible delights, according to Gabriella Coleman, a professor at McGill University who
studies hackers.

"The NSA is a very exciting place for hackers because you have unlimited resources, you have some of the best
talent in the world, whether its cryptographers or mathematicians or hackers, she said. It is just too intellectually
exciting not to go there.

Revealingly, one of the documents leaked by Snowden and published by The Intercept last year was a classified
interview with a top NSA hacker (not the Lamb) who exulted that his job was awesome because we do things that you cant
do anywhere else in the country at least not legally.

We are gainfully employed to hack computers owned by al-Qaida! Asked about the kind of people he works with at the
NSA, he replied, Hackers, geeks, nerds Theres an annual event for hackers in Las Vegas called DEF CON, and many
of us attend. When there, we feel as though we are among our bretheren! [sic] We all have a similar mindset of wanting to
tear things apart, to dig in, to see how things work.

In 2012, Gen. Keith Alexander, the NSA director at the time, even attended DEF CON wearing blue jeans and a black T-
shirt that bore the logo of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an anti-surveillance organization that is beloved by hackers
and other good citizens of the world.

To coincide with Alexanders visit, the NSA had created a special webpage to recruit the hackers at DEF CON. If you have
a few, shall we say, indiscretions in your past, dont be alarmed, the webpage stated. You shouldnt automatically assume
you wont be hired. Alexanders personal pitch was even more direct: In this room right here is the talent we need.

If you are willing to become a patriot hacker, Uncle Sam wants you.

As a teenager, the Lamb was a devout Christian who attended church two or three times a week, yet he also
participated in online forums for Satanists and atheists. He wanted to learn what others believed and why they
believed it, and he wanted to hear their responses to questions he raised. If his beliefs could not withstand
challenges from opposing ones, they might not be worth keeping.

"As a Christian, I believe the Bible, and one of the things it says is if you seek the truth, you should find it, he told
me. If I started to come across facts that contradicted what I believed and contradicted the way that I thought
about things, I had to be open to confronting them and determining how I would integrate them into my life and my
thought system.

Before he became a hacker, the Lamb had the restless spirit of one. After high school, he attended a Christian university for
a year but dropped out and joined the military as a linguist. He was assigned to the NSA, and although he told me his
computer skills were modest at the time, he was intrigued by the mysteries inside the machines.

"I started doing some basic computer training, like Oh, heres how computers talk to each other and network and
that sort of stuff, he said. I enjoyed that far more than trying to maintain a language that I rarely used.

He devoured books on computers and experimented on his own time, using an application called Wireshark to see how
network data was moving to and from his own computer.

He picked up a bit of programming knowledge, and he asked agency veterans for tips. As he wrote in one of his memos, If
you want to learn crazy new things why not walk around NSA, find people in offices that do things you find interesting, and
talk to them about how they do what they do.
Screenshot from NSA document

Like Snowden, he did not need a formal education to succeed. Snowden, after all, dropped out of high school and mastered
computers through self-education. As an NSA contractor, he rose to a position that gave him access to broad swaths of the
agencys networks.

While Snowden was a systems administrator, the Lamb became an expert in network analysis and was well-versed in the
crucial trick of shaping traffic from one place to another - for instance, sending it from an ISP in a foreign country to an NSA
server.

The Lambs work was important, but his memos are remarkably irreverent, even cocky. Ive read a fair number of NSA
documents, and not one contains as much hacker and internet lingo as his; he used words like skillz and internetz and
ZOMG! and phrases like pwn the network and Dude! Map all the networks!!! Some of what he wrote is just cheerily
impudent, like the opening line of one memo: Happy Friday my esteemed and valued intelligence Community colleagues!
Another memo began, Welcome back, comrade!

While poking gentle fun at the government hackers he worked with, the Lamb dismissed the amateur hackers on the
outside. He identified himself and his highly trained colleagues at the NSA as a breed apart - a superior breed, much in the
way that soldiers look down on weekend paintballers. Perhaps this shouldnt be altogether surprising, because arrogance is
one of the unfortunate hallmarks of the male-dominated hacker culture.

At the NSA, this hubris can perhaps serve as an ethical lubricant that eases the task of hacking other people: They are not
as special as you are, they do not have the magical powers you possess, they are targets first and humans second.

As the Lamb wrote in one of his memos;


"When I first went to Blackhat/Defcon, it was with the wide-eyed anticipation of Im going to go listen to all of the
talks that I can, soak up all of the information possible, and become a supar-1337-haxxor. What a let-down of an
experience that was.

You find the most interesting topics and briefings, wait in lines to get a seat, and find yourself straining your ears to
listen to someone that has basically nothing new to say. Most of the talks get hyped up exponentially past any
amount of substance they actually provide.

When I asked the Lamb where he was in the hierarchy of hackers at the NSA, he just smiled and said, I got to the
point where more people would ask me questions than I asked other people questions. He would not delve into
the classified specifics of his job - he despises Snowden for leaking classified information - but I knew a lot
through his memos.

Although network analysis, the Lambs area of expertise, is interesting from a technical perspective, he was one step
removed from the most challenging and menacing type of government hacking - executing finely tuned attacks that infiltrate
individual computers.

Nonetheless, he offered this characterization of his NSA work: They were just ridiculously cool projects that Ill never
forget.

One of the quandaries of technology is that cool does not necessarily mean ethical.

Surveillance tools that are regarded as breakthroughs can be used to spy on innocent people as well as terrorists. This is a
key part of the debate on the NSA, the concern that its formidable powers are being used, or can be used, to undermine
privacy, freedom, and democracy.

The Lambs memos on cool ways to hunt sysadmins triggered a strong reaction when I wrote about them in 2014 with my
colleague Ryan Gallagher. The memos explained how the NSA tracks down the email and Facebook accounts of systems
administrators who oversee computer networks.

After plundering their accounts, the NSA can impersonate the admins to get into their computer networks and pilfer the data
flowing through them. As the Lamb wrote;

"Sys admins generally are not my end target. My end target is the extremist/terrorist or government official that
happens to be using the network who better to target than the person that already has the keys to the
kingdom?

Another of his NSA memos, Network Shaping 101, used Yemen as a theoretical case study for secretly redirecting the
entirety of a countrys internet traffic to NSA servers. The presentation, consisting of a PowerPoint slideshow, was offbeat at
times, with a reference to throwing confetti in the air when a hack worked and jokey lines like, The following section could
also be renamed the Im pulling my hair out in the fetal position while screaming Why didnt it work?! section.

The Lamb also scribbled a hand-drawn diagram about network shaping that included a smiley face in the middle next to the
phrase, YEAH!!! MAKE DATA HAPPEN! The diagram and slideshow were both classified as top secret.
NSA diagram on network shaping - click on the image to view a larger version in a new window

His memos are boastful, even cackling. At the end of one of the sysadmin memos, the Lamb wrote, Current mood:
scheming, and at the end of another, Current mood: devious. He also listed juche-licious as one of his moods, ironically
referring to the official ideology of North Korea.

Another memo he wrote, Tracking Targets Through Proxies & Anonymizers, impishly noted that the use of identity-
obscuring tools like Tor generally makes for sad analysts in the intelligence community; this was followed by a sad face
emoji. The tone of his classified writing was consistent with some of his social media posts - the Lambs attitude, in public as
well as in private, was often outspoken and brash.

What if the shoe was on the other foot, however? When I wrote about the sysadmin memos in 2014, I wondered how their
author would feel if someone used the same devious rationale to hack his computer and his life. Nearly two years later, I
had the chance to find out.

"If I turn the tables on you, I asked the Lamb, and say, OK, youre a target for all kinds of people for all kinds of
reasons. How do you feel about being a target and that kind of justification being used to justify getting all of your
credentials and the keys to your kingdom?

The Lamb smiled. There is no real safe, sacred ground on the internet, he replied. Whatever you do on the
internet is an attack surface of some sort and is just something that you live with. Any time that I do something on
the internet, yeah, that is on the back of my mind.

Anyone from a script kiddie to some random hacker to some other foreign intelligence service, each with their
different capabilities - what could they be doing to me?

He seemed to be putting the blame for NSA attacks on the victims - if they were too dimwitted to protect themselves from
hunters like him, it was their fault.
"People dont want to think about being targets on the internet, in spite of the fact that at this point in the game,
everybody is, he added. Every country spies.

He was dead serious, no smiles any longer.

As much as wed like to say we will all beat our swords into plowshares and become a peaceful people, its not
going to happen, he continued.

Intelligence agencies around the world are being asked questions by their governments, and government officials
dont want to hear, Thats hard to solve. They just say, Can you solve this and can you get me the intel Im asking
for? Which is nation agnostic, whether thats the NSA, the FSB, the PLA or whoever.

The Lambs political ideology evoked the cold-blooded realpolitik of Henry Kissinger. There is the idyllic digital world we
would like to live in, there is the dog-eat-dog digital world we actually live in - and the Lamb, as I understood it, was intensely
focused on winning in the latter.

"You know, the situation is what it is, he said. There are protocols that were designed years ago before anybody
had any care about security, because when they were developed, nobody was foreseeing that they would be taken
advantage of.
A lot of people on the internet seem to approach the problem [with the attitude of] Im just going to walk naked
outside of my house and hope that nobody looks at me. From a security perspective, is that a good way to go
about thinking? No, horrible

There are good ways to be more secure on the internet. But do most people use Tor? No. Do most people use
Signal? No. Do most people use insecure things that most people can hack? Yes. Is that a bash against the
intelligence community that people use stuff thats easily exploitable? Thats a hard argument for me to make.

But it wasnt a hard argument for me to make, so I tried. Back in the 1990s, in the early days of the web, the uses and hopes
for the internet were thought to be joyous and non-commercial. The web would let us talk to one another and would
decentralize power and revolutionize the world in good ways.

Those were the years when the Lamb spent hours and hours in chatrooms with Satanists and atheists - just the sort of
connect-us-to-each-other activity that made everyone so excited about the future. At the time, few people thought the
internet would become, as Bruce Schneier describes it, a surveillance platform.

So I asked whether the Lamb felt conflicted, as Snowden did, working for an organization that turned the web further and
further away from its original potential as a global platform for speaking and thinking freely.

He responded by noting that he is, by nature, a defiant type and attracted to hard problems. Thats how, without a lot of
formal instruction, he became an NSA hacker - he was curious about how computers worked and he wanted to figure them
out. Technically challenging things are just inherently interesting to me, he said. If you tell me, This cant be done, Im
going to try and find a way to do it.

I mentioned that lots of people, including Snowden, are now working on the problem of how to make the internet more
secure, yet he seemed to do the opposite at the NSA by trying to find ways to track and identify people who use Tor and
other anonymizers. Would he consider working on the other side of things?

He wouldnt rule it out, he said, but dismally suggested the game was over as far as having a liberating and safe internet,
because our laptops and smartphones will betray us no matter what we do with them.

"Theres the old adage that the only secure computer is one that is turned off, buried in a box ten feet underground,
and never turned on, he said.

From a user perspective, someone trying to find holes by day and then just live on the internet by night, theres
the expectation [that] if somebody wants to have access to your computer bad enough, theyre going to get it.

Whether thats an intelligence agency or a cybercrimes syndicate, whoever that is, its probably going to happen.

The Lamb was comfortable with the side he joined in the surveillance wars, and this sets him apart from the most
common stereotypes of the men and women who devote their lives to spying on others.

Spies who do nothing but eavesdrop, slipping into computers and conversations without a trace, have a reputation in
popular culture of being troubled in ways that conventional spies are not. Think of Gene Hackman in The Conversation, or
Ulrich Mhe in The Lives of Others - these surveillers are haunted, as it seems they should be.

Gene Hackman in The Conversation

Conventional spies are seen as journeying into hostile lands and committing heroic or devious acts; they are men and
women of action, not thought. But the people who watch, listen, or hack are not as distracted by danger or adrenaline.

They mostly labor in tranquility, in temperature-controlled offices without windows, risking bodily harm no worse than carpal
tunnel syndrome, and they have an abundance of time to think about the lurking that is their occupation and the people on
whom they practice it.

I have a bias against the watchers, I suppose. I have been concerned about the bureaucracies of surveillance since the
1980s, when I was a student in the Soviet Union and felt like hunted prey. The telephone in the dreary lobby of my dormitory
on the banks of the Neva River in Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) was assumed to be bugged, and if the KGBs devices
werent working, the dezhurnaya who sat nearby was sure to be listening.

This was my anti-surveillance Rosebud, I guess. When I visited Russian friends, I stayed silent as I walked in their ill-lit
stairwells, so that the accent of my Russian would not give away the fact a foreigner was visiting them. The walls had ears.

This was one of the great contrasts between the Soviet Union and America, where I could speak to my friends without
worrying about the government listening.

The Soviet Union is long gone, but in 2016 we live under the specter of far more surveillance than anything the KGB could
have dreamed of with its rudimentary bugs and fearful informers. Not just government surveillance - law enforcement can
easily obtain our phone and internet records with a warrant from the nearly always compliant courts - but corporate
surveillance, too.

Its not just Google and Facebook that might know more details about our lives and friends than the KGB could have
imagined in its most feverish dreams of information dominance, but even Zipcar and Amazon.

There are precautions one can take, and I did that with the Lamb. When we had our video chat, I used a computer that had
been wiped clean of everything except its operating system and essential applications. Afterward, it was wiped clean again.

My concern was that the Lamb might use the session to obtain data from or about the computer I was using; there are a lot
of things he might have tried, if he was in a scheming mood.

At the end of our three hours together, I mentioned to him that I had taken these precautions - and he approved.

"Thats fair, he said. Im glad you have that appreciation From a perspective of a journalist who has access to
classified information, it would be remiss to think youre not a target of foreign intelligence services.
He was telling me the U.S. government should be the least of my worries. He was trying to help me.

The Secret Government Rulebook For Labeling You A Terrorist


June 26 2016 | From: TheIntercept

The Obama administration has quietly approved a substantial expansion of the terrorist watchlist
system, authorizing a secret process that requires neither concrete facts nor irrefutable
evidence to designate an American or foreigner as a terrorist, according to a key government
document obtained by The Intercept.

The March 2013 Watchlisting Guidance, a 166-page document issued last year by the National Counterterrorism
Center, spells out the governments secret rules for putting individuals on its main terrorist database, as well as the
no fly list and the selectee list, which triggers enhanced screening at airports and border crossings.

The new guidelines allow individuals to be designated as representatives of terror organizations without any evidence they
are actually connected to such organizations, and it gives a single White House official the unilateral authority to place entire
categories of people the government is tracking onto the no fly and selectee lists.

It broadens the authority of government officials to nominate people to the watchlists based on what is vaguely described
as fragmentary information. It also allows for dead people to be watchlisted.

Over the years, the Obama and Bush Administrations have fiercely resisted disclosing the criteria for placing names on the
databases - though the guidelines are officially labeled as unclassified. In May, Attorney General Eric Holder even invoked
the state secrets privilege to prevent watchlisting guidelines from being disclosed in litigation launched by an American who
was on the no fly list.

In an affidavit, Holder called them a clear roadmap to the governments terrorist-tracking apparatus, adding:
The Watchlisting Guidance, although unclassified, contains national security information that, if disclosed could
cause significant harm to national security.

The rulebook, which The Intercept is publishing in full, was developed behind closed doors by representatives of the nations
intelligence, military, and law-enforcement establishment, including the Pentagon, CIA, NSA, and FBI. Emblazoned with the
crests of 19 agencies, it offers the most complete and revealing look into the secret history of the governments terror list
policies to date.

It reveals a confounding and convoluted system filled with exceptions to its own rules, and it relies on the elastic concept of
reasonable suspicion as a standard for determining whether someone is a possible threat.

Because the government tracks suspected terrorists as well as known terrorists, individuals can be watchlisted if they are
suspected of being a suspected terrorist, or if they are suspected of associating with people who are suspected of terrorism
activity.

Instead of a watchlist limited to actual, known terrorists, the government has built a vast system based on the
unproven and flawed premise that it can predict if a person will commit a terrorist act in the future, says Hina
Shamsi, the head of the ACLUs National Security Project.

On that dangerous theory, the government is secretly blacklisting people as suspected terrorists and giving them
the impossible task of proving themselves innocent of a threat they havent carried out. Shamsi, who reviewed the
document, added, These criteria should never have been kept secret.

The documents definition of terrorist activity includes actions that fall far short of bombing or hijacking. In addition to
expected crimes, such as assassination or hostage-taking, the guidelines also define destruction of government property
and damaging computers used by financial institutions as activities meriting placement on a list. They also define as
terrorism any act that is dangerous to property and intended to influence government policy through intimidation.

This combination - a broad definition of what constitutes terrorism and a low threshold for designating someone a terrorist -
opens the way to ensnaring innocent people in secret government dragnets. It can also be counterproductive.

When resources are devoted to tracking people who are not genuine risks to national security, the actual threats
get fewer resources - and might go unnoticed.

If reasonable suspicion is the only standard you need to label somebody, then its a slippery slope were sliding
down here, because then you can label anybody anything, says David Gomez, a former senior FBI special agent
with experience running high-profile terrorism investigations.

Because you appear on a telephone list of somebody doesnt make you a terrorist. Thats the kind of information
that gets put in there.

The fallout is personal too. There are severe consequences for people unfairly labeled a terrorist by the U.S. government,
which shares its watchlist data with local law enforcement, foreign governments, and private entities.

Once the U.S. government secretly labels you a terrorist or terrorist suspect, other institutions tend to treat you as one. It
can become difficult to get a job (or simply to stay out of jail). It can become burdensome - or impossible - to travel. And
routine encounters with law enforcement can turn into ordeals.
A chart from the March 2013 Watchlisting Guidance

In 2012 Tim Healy, the former director of the FBIs Terrorist Screening Center, described to CBS News how watchlists are
used by police officers.

So if you are speeding, you get pulled over, theyll query that name, he said.

And if they are encountering a known or suspected terrorist, it will pop up and say call the Terrorist Screening
Center. So now the officer on the street knows he may be dealing with a known or suspected terrorist.

Of course, the problem is that the known or suspected terrorist might just be an ordinary citizen who should not be treated
as a menace to public safety.

Until 2001, the government did not prioritize building a watchlist system. On 9/11, the governments list of people barred
from flying included just 16 names.

Today, the no fly list has swelled to tens of thousands of known or suspected terrorists (the guidelines refer to them as
KSTs). The selectee list subjects people to extra scrutiny and questioning at airports and border crossings.

The government has created several other databases, too. The largest is the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment
(TIDE), which gathers terrorism information from sensitive military and intelligence sources around the world.
Because it contains classified information that cannot be widely distributed, there is yet another list, the Terrorist Screening
Database, or TSDB, which has been stripped of TIDEs classified data so that it can be shared.

When government officials refer to the watchlist, they are typically referring to the TSDB. (TIDE is the responsibility of the
National Counterterrorism Center; the TSDB is managed by the Terrorist Screening Center at the FBI.)

In a statement, a spokesman for the National Counterterrorism Center told The Intercept that:

The watchlisting system is an important part of our layered defense to protect the United States against future
terrorist attacks and that watchlisting continues to mature to meet an evolving, diffuse threat.

He added that U.S. citizens are afforded extra protections to guard against improper listing, and that no one can be placed
on a list solely for activities protected by the First Amendment. A representative of the Terrorist Screening Center did not
respond to a request for comment.

The system has been criticized for years. In 2004, Sen. Ted Kennedy complained that he was barred from boarding flights
on five separate occasions because his name resembled the alias of a suspected terrorist.

Two years later, CBS News obtained a copy of the no fly list and reported that it included Bolivian president Evo Morales
and Lebanese parliament head Nabih Berri. One of the watchlists snared Mikey Hicks, a Cub Scout who got his first of many
airport pat-downs at age two. In 2007, the Justice Departments inspector general issued a scathing report identifying
significant weaknesses in the system.

And in 2009, after a Nigerian terrorist was able to board a passenger flight to Detroit and nearly detonated a bomb sewn into
his underwear despite his name having been placed on the TIDE list, President Obama admitted that there had been a
systemic failure.
Obama hoped that his response to the underwear bomber would be a turning point. In 2010, he gave increased powers
and responsibilities to the agencies that nominate individuals to the lists, placing pressure on them to add names. His
administration also issued a set of new guidelines for the watchlists.

Problems persisted, however. In 2012, the U.S. Government Accountability Office published a report that bluntly noted there
was no agency responsible for figuring out whether watchlist-related screening or vetting is achieving intended results. The
guidelines were revised and expanded in 2013 - and a source within the intelligence community subsequently provided a
copy to The Intercept.

Concrete Facts are not Necessary

The five chapters and 11 appendices of the Watchlisting Guidance are filled with acronyms, legal citations, and numbered
paragraphs; it reads like an arcane textbook with a vocabulary all its own. Different types of data on suspected terrorists are
referred to as derogatory information, substantive derogatory information, extreme derogatory information and
particularized derogatory information.

The names of suspected terrorists are passed along a bureaucratic ecosystem of originators, nominators, aggregators,
screeners, and encountering agencies. And upgrade, usually a happy word for travellers, is repurposed to mean that an
individual has been placed on a more restrictive list.
The heart of the document revolves around the rules for placing individuals on a watchlist. All executive departments and
agencies, the document says, are responsible for collecting and sharing information on terrorist suspects with the National
Counterterrorism Center.

It sets a low standard - reasonable suspicion - for placing names on the watchlists, and offers a multitude of vague,
confusing, or contradictory instructions for gauging it. In the chapter on Minimum Substantive Derogatory Criteria - even
the title is hard to digest - the key sentence on reasonable suspicion offers little clarity:

To meet the REASONABLE SUSPICION standard, the NOMINATOR, based on the totality of the circumstances,
must rely upon articulable intelligence or information which, taken together with rational inferences from those
facts, reasonably warrants a determination that an individual is known or suspected to be or has been knowingly
engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to TERRORISM and/or TERRORIST
ACTIVITIES.

The rulebook makes no effort to define an essential phrase in the passage - articulable intelligence or information. After
stressing that hunches are not reasonable suspicion and that there must be an objective factual basis for labeling
someone a terrorist, it goes on to state that no actual facts are required:

In determining whether a REASONABLE SUSPICION exists, due weight should be given to the specific
reasonable inferences that a NOMINATOR is entitled to draw from the facts in light of his/her experience and not
on unfounded suspicions or hunches.

Although irrefutable evidence or concrete facts are not necessary, to be reasonable, suspicion should be as clear
and as fully developed as circumstances permit.

While the guidelines nominally prohibit nominations based on unreliable information, they explicitly regard uncorroborated
Facebook or Twitter posts as sufficient grounds for putting an individual on one of the watchlists.

Single source information, the guidelines state, including but not limited to walk-in, write-in, or postings on
social media sites, however, should not automatically be discounted
the NOMINATING AGENCY should evaluate the credibility of the source, as well as the nature and specificity of
the information, and nominate even if that source is uncorroborated.

There are a number of loopholes for putting people onto the watchlists even if reasonable suspicion cannot be met.

One is clearly defined: The immediate family of suspected terrorists - their spouses, children, parents, or siblings - may be
watchlisted without any suspicion that they themselves are engaged in terrorist activity.

But another loophole is quite broad - associates who have a defined relationship with a suspected terrorist, but whose
involvement in terrorist activity is not known. A third loophole is broader still - individuals with a possible nexus to terrorism,
but for whom there is not enough derogatory information to meet the reasonable suspicion standard.

Americans and foreigners can be nominated for the watchlists if they are associated with a terrorist group, even if that group
has not been designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government.

They can also be treated as representatives of a terrorist group even if they have neither membership in nor association
with the organization. The guidelines do helpfully note that certain associations, such as providing janitorial services or
delivering packages, are not grounds for being watchlisted.

The nomination system appears to lack meaningful checks and balances. Although government officials have repeatedly
said there is a rigorous process for making sure no one is unfairly placed in the databases, the guidelines acknowledge that
all nominations of known terrorists are considered justified unless the National Counterterrorism Center has evidence to
the contrary.

In a recent court filing, the government disclosed that there were 468,749 KST nominations in 2013, of which only 4,915
were rejecteda rate of about one percent. The rulebook appears to invert the legal principle of due process, defining
nominations as presumptively valid.
Profiling Categories of People

While the nomination process appears methodical on paper, in practice there is a shortcut around the entire system. Known
as a threat-based expedited upgrade, it gives a single White House official the unilateral authority to elevate entire
categories of people whose names appear in the larger databases onto the no fly or selectee lists. This can occur, the
guidelines state, when there is a particular threat stream indicating that a certain type of individual may commit a terrorist
act.

This extraordinary power for categorical watchlisting - otherwise known as profiling - is vested in the assistant to the
president for homeland security and counterterrorism, a position formerly held by CIA Director John Brennan that does not
require Senate confirmation.

The rulebook does not indicate what categories of people have been subjected to threat-based upgrades. It is not clear, for
example, whether a category might be as broad as military-age males from Yemen. The guidelines do make clear that
American citizens and green card holders are subject to such upgrades, though government officials are required to review
their status in an expedited procedure.

Upgrades can remain in effect for 72 hours before being reviewed by a small committee of senior officials. If approved, they
can remain in place for 30 days before a renewal is required, and can continue until the threat no longer exists.

In a set of watchlisting criteria riddled with exceptions that swallow rules, this exception is perhaps the most
expansive and certainly one of the most troubling, Shamsi, the ACLU attorney, says.

Its reminiscent of the Bush administrations heavily criticized color-coded threat alerts, except that here,
bureaucrats can exercise virtually standard-less authority in secret with specific negative consequences for entire
categories of people.

The National Counterterrorism Center declined to provide any details on the upgrade authority, including how often it has
been exercised and for what categories of people.
Pocket Litter and Scuba Gear

The guidelines provide the clearest explanation yet of what is happening when Americans and foreigners are pulled aside at
airports and border crossings by government agents. The fifth chapter, titled Encounter Management and Analysis, details
the type of information that is targeted for collection during encounters with people on the watchlists, as well as the
different organizations that should collect the data.

The Department of Homeland Security is described as having the largest number of encounters, but other authorities,
ranging from the State Department and Coast Guard to foreign governments and certain private entities, are also involved
in assembling encounter packages when watchlisted individuals cross their paths. The encounters can be face-to-face
meetings or electronic interactions - for instance, when a watchlisted individual applies for a visa.

In addition to data like fingerprints, travel itineraries, identification documents and gun licenses, the rules encourage
screeners to acquire health insurance information, drug prescriptions, any cards with an electronic strip on it (hotel cards,
grocery cards, gift cards, frequent flyer cards), cellphones, email addresses, binoculars, peroxide, bank account numbers,
pay stubs, academic transcripts, parking and speeding tickets, and want ads.

The digital information singled out for collection includes social media accounts, cell phone lists, speed dial numbers, laptop
images, thumb drives, iPods, Kindles, and cameras. All of the information is then uploaded to the TIDE database.

Screeners are also instructed to collect data on any pocket litter, scuba gear, EZ Passes, library cards, and the titles of any
books, along with information about their condition - e.g., new, dog-eared, annotated, unopened. Business cards and
conference materials are also targeted, as well as anything with an account number and information about any gold or
jewelry worn by the watchlisted individual.
Even animal information - details about pets from veterinarians or tracking chips - is requested. The rulebook also
encourages the collection of biometric or biographical data about the travel partners of watchlisted individuals.

The list of government entities that collect this data includes the U.S. Agency for International Development, which is neither
an intelligence nor law-enforcement agency. As the rulebook notes, USAID funds foreign aid programs that promote
environmentalism, health care, and education.

USAID, which presents itself as committed to fighting global poverty, nonetheless appears to serve as a conduit for sensitive
intelligence about foreigners. According to the guidelines, When USAID receives an application seeking financial
assistance, prior to granting, these applications are subject to vetting by USAID intelligence analysts at the TSC.

The guidelines do not disclose the volume of names provided by USAID, the type of information it provides, or the number
and duties of the USAID intelligence analysts.

A USAID spokesman told The Intercept that in certain high risk countries, such as Afghanistan, USAID has determined that
vetting potential partner organizations with the terrorist watchlist is warranted to protect U.S. taxpayer dollars and to
minimize the risk of inadvertent funding of terrorism.

He stated that since 2007, the agency has checked the names and other personal identifying information of key individuals
of contractors and grantees, and sub-recipients.
Death and the Watchlist

The government has been widely criticized for making it impossible for people to know why they have been placed on a
watchlist, and for making it nearly impossible to get off. The guidelines bluntly state that the general policy of the U.S.
Government is to neither confirm nor deny an individuals watchlist status. But the courts have taken exception to the official
silence and footdragging: In June, a federal judge described the governments secretive removal process as unconstitutional
and wholly ineffective.

The difficulty of getting off the list is highlighted by a passage in the guidelines stating that an individual can be kept on the
watchlist, or even placed onto the watchlist, despite being acquitted of a terrorism-related crime.

The rulebook justifies this by noting that conviction in U.S. courts requires evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, whereas
watchlisting requires only a reasonable suspicion. Once suspicion is raised, even a jurys verdict cannot erase it.

Not even death provides a guarantee of getting off the list. The guidelines say the names of dead people will stay on the list
if there is reason to believe the deceaseds identity may be used by a suspected terroristwhich the National
Counterterrorism Center calls a demonstrated terrorist tactic. In fact, for the same reason, the rules permit the deceased
spouses of suspected terrorists to be placed onto the list after they have died.

For the living, the process of getting off the watchlist is simple yet opaque. A complaint can be filed through the Department
of Homeland Security Traveler Redress Inquiry Program, which launches an internal review that is not subject to oversight
by any court or entity outside the counterterrorism community.
The review can result in removal from a watchlist or an adjustment of watchlist status, but the individual will not be told if he
or she prevails. The guidelines highlight one of the reasons why it has been difficult to get off the list - if multiple agencies
have contributed information on a watchlisted individual, all of them must agree to removing him or her.

If a U.S. citizen is placed on the no fly list while abroad and is turned away from a flight bound for the U.S., the guidelines
say they should be referred to the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate, which is prohibited from informing them why they
were blocked from flying.

According to the rules, these individuals can be granted a One-Time Waiver to fly, though they will not be told
that they are traveling on a waiver.

Back in the United States, they will be unable to board another flight.

The document states that nominating agencies are under a continuing obligation to provide exculpatory information when it
emerges. It adds that the agencies are expected to conduct annual reviews of watchlisted American citizens and green card
holders. It is unclear whether foreigners - or the dead - are reviewed at the same pace.

As the rulebook notes, watchlisting is not an exact science.

This Story Could Be The Smoking Gun For False-Flag Operations + Santa Monica
Terror Suspect Becomes Poster Child For Gun Grabbers
June 25 2016 | From: NeedToKnowNews / Infowars

Santa Monica; Two police officers who wish to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation say that
James Wesley Howell, an Indiana man who was found with a car full of explosives and weapons,
told police he was part of a team that planned shooting attacks on gay communities in Florida and
California.
Howell told police he was turning himself in because he wanted protection. His story was that he had been assured
by his recruiters that he would not be harmed in the shooting but, when he heard on the news that Omar Mateen,
the lead gunman in the Orlando group, had been killed by sniper fire, he realized he was being set up as a patsy
and would be killed.

Related: Robert Steele: Draft List of 63 Orlando False Flag Anomalies

Soon after that, the FBI took over the investigation, and information to the public was filtered to remove any facts that might
show the Orlando shooting as a planned event involving others. GetOffTheBS 2016 Jun 15 (Story) (Cached)

It is important to remember that the police officers who are the source of this story choose to remain anonymous, so it
cannot be independently verified at this time, but circumstantial evidence supports it.

For example:

1. After the FBI took charge of the investigation, Police Chief Jacqueline Seabrooks changed her original report
that Howell was part of a group of five people who intended to do harm at the gay-pride event in West Hollywood.
Her altered report made no mention of anyone other than Howell.

2. The web site that reported this story is still carrying the article without triggering legal action against it. That is
significant because, if the story is false, immediate legal action would be expected. If it is true, Howell will be killed
or disappeared to prevent him from talking, but the last thing the perpetrators would want is a public trial where
witnesses can be called to testify.

This news story could be one of the most important reports ever published in the annals of journalism.

Thats quite a statement but, when you consider the nature of its content, it is no exaggeration to say that it has the potential
to fundamentally change the relationship between the United States government and the American people, and that could
lead to a profound change, not only in America, but the entire world.

The story still is still unfolding, and it is likely that officialdom either will pull it off the Internet or do everything possible to
discredit it but, unlike most false-flag scenarios, there are many people on the outside of the plot who can verify the
accuracy of this one. In fact, there may even be an entire police department to do that. If so, the sheer number of witnesses
could outweigh the threats against job security or physical safety. We shall see.

Santa Monica Terror Suspect Becomes Poster Child For Gun Grabbers
Indiana Rep. Ed DeLaney said on Tuesday the state blew it when it did not enforce a gun ban on
James Wesley Howell, the man arrested in Santa Monica, California on weapons charges soon
after the attack on the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida.

Delaney, a Democrat, wants to outlaw 30-round ammunition magazines and automatic military-type weapons. He
said Indiana has very, very limited gun laws.

Police records indicate Howell was in possession of a loaded AM-15, a firearm similar to an AR-15 manufactured by
Anderson rifles. The AM-15 is a civilian weapon and is not fully automatic, as Delaney claims. Since Orlando, Democrats
have characterized semi-automatic rifles as automatic military weapons.

Guy Relford, the owner of Tactical Firearms Training in Indianapolis and a Second Amendment attorney, told the Associated
Press DeLaney simply doesnt understand anything about firearms. He added that the 1994 assault weapons ban did
nothing to reduce violent crime. His claim is backed up by a study by the National Institute of Justice.

Every time we have a mass shooting what these politicians want to do is to turn around and take guns
out of the hands of everybody who didnt do it, Relford said.

Hillary Clinton and Obama now refer to civilian firearms as weapons of war. Earlier this month, Florida Rep. Alan Grayson
told CNN an AR-15 can fire 700 rounds per minute.

If [Mateen] was not able to buy a weapon that shoots off 700 rounds in a minute, a lot of those people would still
be alive, the Democrat congressman said.

If somebody like him had nothing worse to deal with than a Glock pistol he might have killed three or four
people and not 50. Its way too easy to kill people in America today, and we have to think long and hard about what
to do about that.

The firearm allegedly used by Omar Mateen in Orlando was a Sig Sauer MCX rifle. It fires 45 rounds per minute.
Grayson later modified his statement to say Mateens firearm could fire 700 rounds per minute if converted to full
auto.
Police also say Howell was in possession of Shoc-Shot, a binary explosive marketed primarily for making exploding targets
for firearms practice. The binary explosive cannot be ignited with a fuse or electric charge. Police told the media Howell was
in possession of an IED-type of device.

In March, NBCs Today Show characterized a similar product, Tannerite, as a dangerous explosive.

Bob Owens of Bearing Arms wrote:

You can expose it to an electrical charge, and it will not detonate. You can try to ignite it with a match or a torch,
or smash it with a hammer. It will not detonate.

You can shoot it will a .22 rifle or 9mm +P hollowpoint from a pistol, and it will not go off. The minimum threshold to
consistently detonate a Tannerite is a FMJ [full metal jacket] bullet moving at a bare minimum of 2,000 feet-per-
second.

Howell was rated a low-level offender in Indiana on a misdemeanor intimidation conviction and ordered in April to forfeit all
firearms under the terms of his probation.

Federal Effort to Outlaw Firearms Stalled

Earlier this week, the Senate refused to advance four measures on so-called gun control. Senator Susan Collins,
Republican of Maine, and Senator Heidi Heitkamp, Democrat of North Dakota, responded to the defeat by announcing a
proposal to prohibit gun sales to individuals on the governments secret no-fly and selectee lists.

Surely the terrorist attacks in San Bernardino and Orlando that took so many lives are a call for compromise, a
plea for bipartisan action, Collins said.
Essentially, we believe if you are too dangerous to fly on an airplane, you are too dangerous to buy a gun.

Collins was joined at a news conference announcing the proposal by Senator Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat who is
frequently mentioned as a potential running mate for Hillary Clinton.

Several Million Readers Are Unable To Help Prove The Official Orlando Shootings
Story + Reasons To Question The Official Story Of The Orlando Shooting
June 21 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / GlobalResearch /

The apparently fake (false-flag) Orlando nightclub shootings are - in keeping with their modus
operandi - being used by the Cabal for multiple purposes. Just as with Sandy Hook, there have
been no bodies produced - no evidence to back any claims made. All the while the public lap up
what they are told to believe is real, as the narrative is forced towards gun control, ISIS, race /
religion conflicts and all sorts of other trivia - providing a very effective media blackout for other
events taking place unnoticed with the convenient benefit of a media smokescreen.

As not a single one of my several hundred thousand readers of this [ paucraigroberts.com ] site plus the several
million who read repostings on other sites and translations abroad have been able to find a shred of evidence that
corroborates the official story of the Orlando mass shooting, I close my attempt to prove the governments case.

Related: Worst Mass Shooting In US History Leaves 50 Dead, Many Wounded At Orlando Gay Club - Shooter
Pledged ISIS Allegiance + Shooter An Employee Of CIA Front Company Wackenhut / G4S Sacrificial Lamb?

In the URL below is an account that is likely overall correct. However, the author, in an attempt to marshall all possible
evidence against the US government, inadvertantly buys into the governments account, as so many skeptics do.
The author says that Mateen, like Tsarnaev, was known to the authorities, who let him proceed unfettered.

By involving authorities as permissive accomplices, the author undermines the account that it was a false flag attack.

So many skeptics do this that it makes you wonder: Orlando Nightclub Shooting: Questions and Anomalies
Surround Worst Mass Shooting in U.S. History

Reasons To Question The Official Story Of The Orlando Shooting

As more and more evidence emerges regarding the mass shooting in an Orlando gay club that
resulted in the death of at least 52 people and many more injured, signs are increasingly pointing
toward the possibility of a false flag operation.

Already, a number of points lend credence to those who might suggest that intelligence agencies more so than desert-
dwelling terrorist organizations are responsible for organizing and directing the attacks.

A number of questionable aspects regarding this shooting include:

1. The FBI knew about the shooter and investigated him prior to the attack.

2. The shooter had a connection to a known ISIS recruiter.

3. The shooters father was a former Afghan presidential candidate who supported the Taliban.

4. The FBIs history in creating terrorism.

Omar Mir Seddique Mateen has now been revealed as the gunman in the Orlando club attack. According to mainstream
reports, Mateen carried an AR-15 rifle and a handgun into the Pulse club around 2 a.m. and started shooting, killing 50
people and wounding 53. A stand-off ensued which lasted for about 3 hours before a SWAT team crashed into the building
with an armored vehicle and killed Mateen.
There was a distinct lack of dead bodies and bloodied 'survivors'

Mateen had allegedly pledged allegiance to ISIS before the shooting by calling 911 and stating allegiance to ISIS leader Abu
Bakr Al-Baghdadi as well as mentioning the Tsarnaev brothers. Mateen was an American citizen born to Afghan parents
from Port St. Lucie, Florida, about a 125 miles away from Orlando, a distance which he allegedly drove to commit the attack.

FBI Foreknowledge, ISIS Sympathies,Taliban Ties

What may at first sound like an instance of senseless violence, brings with it a number of other questions. For instance, the
FBI was already well aware of Mateen and his connections to radical jihad and terrorism.

According to CNNs article, 50 Killed in Florida Nightclub, Shooter Pledged ISIS Allegiance, two officials tell CNN that the
FBI had investigated Mateen at some point for possibly having ties to or sympathizing with Islamic extremism. A law
enforcement official said there were two cases opened involving Mateen but the probes didnt result in enough evidence to
charge him with anything.

The investigations were reported by a number of mainstream media organizations and later confirmed by the FBI itself
during a press conference. The FBI admitted that Mateen had been interviewed by agents twice in 2013 due to comments
made about radical jihad which were overheard by coworkers.

He was interviewed for a third time one year later due to his connection to Moner Mohammad Abu Salha, an American who
had traveled from Florida to train in Syria and later to return to the United States in order to recruit other Americans to fight
in the Western-backed terrorist brigades attempting to overthrow secular and legitimate government, Bashar Al Assad.
Salha allegedly returned to Syria and blew himself up in a suicide bombing. It is also interesting to note that Mateens father
Seddique Mateen is a political personality in his own right having hosted a TV show and apparently declared himself
a presidential candidate for Afghanistan.

Seddique has denounced the Pakistani government and expressed support and encouragement for the Taliban movement.

Still, the question regarding the fact that Mateen was on the FBIs radar is extremely important. One key aspect suggesting
a false flag that should be looked for soon after the attack is any possible connection the suspect or group of suspects may
have had with intelligence agencies.

A connection to any one of these organizations and institutions may go some length in explaining how the attack was
coordinated, the motivation of the perpetrators, the actual involvement (or not) of the suspects, and who actually directed the
operation.
For instance, on 9/11, many of the alleged hijackers had previously had close contact with the FBI, CIA, and other high-level
intelligence agencies (both home and abroad). Likewise, the Tsarnaev brothers who have been accused of masterminding
and carrying out the Boston Bombing had ties to the FBI before the attack.

In many instances, connections to certain military agencies and communities should serve as the same red flag as
connections to intelligence agencies since these institutions have largely been blended together.

The FBIs Sordid History of Organizing Terrorist Attacks

Indeed, the FBI has had a long history in creating, organizing and facilitating terrorist attacks in order to bust them at the last
minute and claim credit for stopping terror attacks.

The FBI also has a long history of investigating, monitoring and interviewing suspects of high-profile terrorist attacks before
those attacks were committed but doing nothing about them.

As Tony Cartalucci writes in his article, US Law Enforcement Knew Florida Shooter BEFORE Shooting,

A terror suspect armed to the teeth storming a public place and killing scores is actually a very familiar script. The
FBI wrote several such scripts in 2015 alone, including entrapping and arresting a mentally-ill suspect after
providing him with an arsenal of deadly weapons almost identical to the arsenal recently employed in Flordia.

The Intercept would report in its article, Another Terror Arrest; Another Mentally Ill Man, Armed by the FBI, that:

U.S. law enforcement officials announced another terror arrest on Monday, after arming a mentally ill man and
then charging him with having guns.

ABC News quoted a senior federal official briefed on the arrest as saying: This is a very bad person arrested
before he could do very bad things.

But in a sting reminiscent of so many others conducted by the FBI since 9/11, Alexander Ciccolo, 23, aka Ali Al
Amriki, was apparently a mentally ill man who was doing nothing more than ranting about violent jihad and talking
(admittedly in frightening ways) about launching attacks - until he met an FBI informant. At that point, he started
making shopping lists for weapons.

The Intercept would also reference the FBIs affidavit (.pdf), stating (emphasis added):

According to the affidavit, Ciccolo first talked to the FBI informant about attacking two bars and a police station.
Later, he spoke of attacking a college campus with a homemade pressure-cooker bomb like the one used in the
Boston Marathon terror attack; he also talked about using guns and a lot of ammo. Ciccolo, according to the
affidavit, then ordered the firearms from a confidential human source (CHS) working with the FBI.

The list of weapons provided to the mentally-ill suspect by the FBI informant is shocking. Revealed in the official
FBI affidavit (.pdf), the weapons included a 9mm Glock 17, a 10mm Glock 20, a .223 Colt AR-15 rifle, (referred to
by the media as an assault rifle), and a 556 Sig Arms SG550 rifle (also often referred to as an assault rifle). Also
included in the affidavit is the same hysterical rhetoric encouraged by FBI informants now evident in the recent
actions of terror suspect Omar Mateen in Florida.

The FBI literally provided a mentally-ill man they helped plan a terrorist attack together with, an arsenal of deadly
weapons arresting him just before he committed his crime.

The only factor that prevented the 2015 entrapment of Ciccolo from becoming a live Florida shooting-style attack
was the fact that the FBI arrested Ciccolo before he carried out his planned attack while those following Mateen
did not arrest him.

The role of the FBI in Mateen obtaining his weapons will never be known since Mateen is now conveniently
dead.

Even if he purchased them legally at a gun store, it should be noted that in other FBI entrapment cases, suspects
were encouraged to purchase weapons themselves, with the FBI arresting them only after they left gun stores with
their newly acquired arsenal.

Interestingly enough, in the Ciccolo incident that Cartalucci refers to above, the plan which was fed to Ciccolo involved
attacking bars, a target that was actually realized in Orlando.

Of course, there will be many who will argue that the FBI, while entrapping unintelligent suspects, would never actually let
the drill go live it is important to remember the 1993 World Trade Center bombing where that is precisely what the FBI did.

Who Controls ISIS?

Lastly, one immensely important question must be asked: If ISIS is responsible for the attacks, who controls ISIS? For
many, claims that the attacker belongs to ISIS is a deal breaker. For these individuals, ISIS is a shadowy terrorist
organization that supports itself and has created a caliphate in eastern Syria and western Iraq that can scarcely be defeated
(except when the Russians bomb it).

However, the facts do not support such a shallow understanding of the ISIS terrorist organization.
ISIS was entirely created, funded and directed by the United States, Britain, France and other NATO countries. Its actions
have been coordinated by the Anglo-American Intelligence apparatus for geopolitical purposes all across the world both at
home and abroad.

For this reason, the declaration that ISIS committed a terrorist attack in Paris is by no means a get-out-of-jail-free card for
the Western Intelligence apparatus. Instead, it is the trademark of their handiwork. Please see these articles for more
information on the nature of ISIS: here, here, here and here.

Conclusion

While the right-wing media blames Muslims and the left-wing media blame guns, perhaps it would be more effective if
thinking individuals would examine the possibilities that this attack was a false flag incident designed to push an agenda that
would benefit those in power in some way or other.

Out of this attack we will no doubt see another push for the evisceration of the Second Amendment and other civil liberties
as well as increased hype regarding ISIS as a threat to the American way of life and a greater attempt at justification for
foreign adventures.
While the information presented above may not be enough evidence to prove in the court of law that the Orlando attack was
a false flag attack, it is reason enough to question the official story thus far. If this attack is indeed placed in the lap of ISIS,
however, all fingers should immediately point to NATO and the Atlanticist Intelligence apparatus.

It is they who control ISIS and they who bear the responsibility for its actions. If the attack is attributed to a lone jihadist nut
the FBI has some serious explaining to do since it appears that the agency itself is the greatest initiator of terrorist activity
inside American borders and is either the most incompetent anti-terror fighter in the U.S. or it is complicit in the attacks that
take place.

Related Articles:

The sheer volume of information coming out and articles being written is voluminous and far too much to be worked into one
article.

Below is just a sampling that provides a much larger picture of what has really been going on. Some are more
perceptive than others...

Kevin Barrett: Is Orlando a False Flag? Update 13: Floor Plan 8 Exits Over 8 CCTV Cameras New Hypothesis -
FBI Continues to Cover Up

Orlando nightclub massacre eyewitnesses: 'More than one shooter, snipers fired at police, someone blocked
exits'

New Orlando Shooter Eyewitness Emerges: Testifies That 5 People Were Involved In Pulse Attack

Orlando Shooter Wasnt the First Murderer Employed By Global Mercenary Firm

What the Media is NOT Telling You about the Orlando Shootout

Orlando nightclub massacre eyewitnesses: 'More than one shooter, snipers fired at police, someone blocked
exits'

No Lone Wolf Shooting? Reported Multiple Orlando Gunmen


Is This What Orlando Is All About?

Orlando shooter: deeper hidden ties to the FBI?

Father of Orlando Shooter is Long-time CIA Asset

Stop Exploiting LGBT Issues to Demonize Islam and Justify Anti-Muslim Policies

Nine Lost Souls the FBI Charged as Terrorists While Letting the Orlando Shooter Go

Read This Before The Government Uses the Orlando Shooting to Start Another War

New Zealand Defence Force To Get $20bn Upgrade + More To Planned US Warship
Visit Than Mere Celebration
June 20 2016 | From: RadioNewZealand / Various

The government will spend $20 billion on the Defence Force in a long-term investment plan that
includes a new cyber security system for defence networks.

The $20bn spend outlined in the White Paper will be spread over 15 years

A new White Paper, which updates the Defence Force's policy, was released on June 8th that detailed plans to
replace the Air Force Boeing 757, the C130-Hercules, the Orion maritime patrol aircraft and the ANZAC frigates,
over the next 15 years.

It also said work was well under way to consider whether the existing Light Armoured Vehicles might be modernised, or
replaced.
The plan allows for the replacement or review of the Defence Force's aircraft, frigates and Light Armoured Vehicles

While New Zealand did not face the prospect of an imminent military attack, there were growing threats as a result of failing
states and pressure on food and water resources, the paper said.

Prime Minister John Key said the new policy was being launched at a time of "increasing uncertainty and instability in the
international environment".

"The emergence of ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant), heightened tensions in the East and South China
seas, increases in military spending across South East Asia, and the rapid evolution and spread of cyber threats
are just a few examples," he said.

New Zealand's geographical isolation did not provide the protection it once did, Mr Key said.

"As a maritime nation dependent on open trade routes, our security and prosperity is inextricably linked to events
occurring far from our shores.

New Zealand needs a defence force than can protect New Zealand and also contribute to international security
and stability," he said.
Prime Minister John Key presents the White Paper at Parliament

This included responding to activities in New Zealand's Exclusive Economic Zone, Antarctica and the Southern Ocean, Mr
Key said.

Cyber security was also identified as a major new risk, and a new defence cyber support network would be developed.

More intelligence personnel would be hired to help analyse and distribute information collected from surveillance. The paper
noted demand for disaster relief and and recovery efforts in the South Pacific would increase in coming decades.

Cyber Attacks 'As Effective a Weapon as a Bomb'

The White Paper noted increasing reliance on technology and information was creating "new vulnerabilities".

The threat to systems relying on networked technologies had increased "markedly" since 2010, it said.

"New Zealand therefore has an interest in contributing to international cyberspace and space efforts to protect this
infrastructure from being exploited or disrupted."

Defence Minister Gerry Brownlee would not give specific details about the resourcing for the boosted cyber security system,
as that had not yet been determined.
Defence Minister Gerry Brownlee also spoke at the paper's presentation

"But it will be a significant number of people who are deployed into the armed forces or from the armed forces who
will specialise in, to a greater extent, in this sort of deterrent."

Mr Brownlee said cyber weapons were now significant, as evidenced by the reliance of individuals on a multitude of
technologies.

"Now you can multiply that across a whole economy, or a whole set of economies and see what the potential might
be to turn an attack on that - we all know about this - cyber attacks into an effective a weapon as a bomb.

So it's a much wider concept than just saying it's to protect, or it's to attack - we need to know what other people
are up to, particularly in a military sense."

When asked how closely the Government Communications Security Bureau would be involved, Mr Brownlee said there
would be a "high level of co-operation".

Maritime Threats and Illegal Fishing

As activity in New Zealand's waters increased, the White Paper warned incidents that required a New Zealand response
were more likely to occur.

It said the size, intrinsic value and challenges associated with managing the country's large maritime domain underlined the
significance of maritime threats to New Zealand.
The White Paper highlighted the Defence Force's activities and responsibilities in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean

New Zealand had a direct interest in the stability of Antarctica and the Southern Ocean, including its preservation, and the
Defence Force must continue to monitor illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing, the paper said.

Mr Brownlee said illegal fishing came at a great cost to the country.

"Illegal fishing is one of the things that troubles us the most. It is an attack on our economy.

Similarly throughout the Pacific when you have unregulated fishing in some of our Pacific neighbours, that is also
an attack on their economy and comes at a cost to us and our partner nations," Mr Brownlee said.

The White Paper also raised concerns about escalating tensions in the East and South China seas.

Over half of the country's maritime trade passed through the South China Sea, and the paper predicted that, over the
coming decades, it was likely to remain a contested environment.

There would be serious implications for trade routes, and New Zealand's ability to service markets, should major instability
occur in the region, it said.

"A secure maritime environment is vital to ensure our continued prosperity through maritime trade, as it is
estimated that 99 percent of New Zealand's exports and imports are delivered by sea transport," Chief of the
Defence Force Lieutenant General Tim Keating said.
"We just can't leave maritime security responsibilities to others without having a credible contribution
ourselves," he said.

Funding Not Broken Down

A $20bn price tag over the next 15 years would be needed to implement the plan, but the White Paper did not contain a
specific breakdown of costs.

Related: Defence White Paper 2016


Mr Key said the money would have to be appropriated through the normal budget process.

"So Budget 2016 had the forecast period where there was some obviously increase but also base allocation
for [the Defence Force].

Secondly, there is some that can be funded through their depreciation allowance but over time, future budgets will
have to make bigger allowances, both capital and operating, for Defence's capability."

The level of military spending was justified, Mr Key said.

"Well, firstly, it's over a long period of time... Secondly, if you look at our spending at about 1.1 percent of GDP, it's
at the more modest end of spending when nations allocate resources towards our military capability."

More To Planned US Warship Visit Than Mere Celebration

Nicky Hager writes "Let the US send a warship" to be part of the NZ Navy's 75th birthday in
November because the Nuclear-Free Act will not be threatened by such a visit.

The United States nuclear powered warship Texas arrives in New Zealand, in August 1983

The response of Auckland Peace Action is that it is not okay for any warships from anywhere to come to New
Zealand, nuclear-armed or not.
Related: New Zealand To Abandon Its Hard Fought Nuclear Free Stance?

The aspirations of the nuclear-free movement of the 1970s and 1980s did not come from a selfish desire to be safe from
nuclear war and fallout. It was a powerful political movement that demanded a different kind of world: one entirely free of
nuclear weapons, and one in which New Zealand set an example as a neutral, non-aligned, peacemaking country.

What Nicky Hager failed to mention and what people need to know today about the proposed visit of some 30 navies
(including the US Navy) is that this event, billed as a "celebration", is part of an enormous arms fair sponsored by the world's
largest weapons manufacturers - including nuclear weapons makers - and a military recruiting and public-relations campaign
that will involve New Zealand in future wars.

The nuclear-free legislation isn't threatened; it has just been sidelined.

The week of events planned for Auckland in November is sponsored by many companies who directly profit from war,
including Lockheed Martin, Thales, Babcock, ThyssenKrupp, and Cubic Defence (all in the top 100 list of international arms
companies), along with the NZ Defence Industry Association, itself an industry trade promotion group consisting of another
60-odd members involved in weapons and military-related production.

Lockheed Martin is the world's largest weapons manufacturer and supplier to such regimes as Saudi Arabia, a country that
today stands accused of using these very weapons to commit war crimes.

Along with the "International Fleet Review" which is essentially a parade of military hardware, a two-day arms fair at the ANZ
Viaduct Events Centre is planned. Lockheed Martin is the principle sponsor and more than 500 delegates and weapons
company representatives are expected. Here, military men can make deals to buy all the naval hardware and other
weaponry on display.

Unsurprisingly, Lockheed Martin currently has a $446 million contract with the NZ Navy to upgrade New Zealand's two
frigates, Te Mana and Te Kaha, boats the Government has already indicated it plans to replace as part of its $20 billion
boost to the NZ Defence Force announced as part of last week's Defence White Paper.

This enormous injection of cash into the military is happening despite the NZDF's own evidence that "the country does not
face a direct military threat in the foreseeable future".

The NZDF and those who support New Zealand's involvement in US wars, however, clearly do see a threat - a threat
to their public support and, thus, continued operations.

This is the real reason behind the Navy's 75th birthday.


Their "celebration" is a stage-managed marketing event to secure public support for future wars, ever-increasing
budgets and the recruitment of young men and women to fight and die.

The Navy says so itself: its four goals for the event are "reputation, relationships, retention and recruiting".

The New Zealand military has been continuously at war in Afghanistan alongside the US for 15 years; it is conducting
regular training with the US Marine Corp, and it participates in the largest maritime war exercises in the world, the US-led
Rimpac.

Related: RIMPAC, the Rim of the Pacific Exercise, is the world's largest international maritime warfare exercise

Instead of leading us to complacency because the Nuclear-Free Act is still intact, Hager could have taken the opportunity to
encourage a redoubling of the efforts of the thousands of people who worked to make New Zealand nuclear-free and the
necessity of expanding that position.

That movement was brave, capable and courageous 30 years ago. It is a movement to truly celebrate, but its work remains
unfinished.

It is that work that is now urgently necessary.

Related: Fully Loaded: The Ten Biggest Gun Manufacturers in America

New Zealand To Abandon Its Hard Fought Nuclear Free Stance?


June 18 2016 | From: KiwiWatch

How disgraceful it is that Prime Minister Key in considering U.S. navy ship visits. For New Zealand
this is a deplorable betrayal of the years of stiff arming by the U.S. against New Zealand because
our nation stood up for peace and was counted as being against the proliferation of nuclear
weapons demonstrating that we have an independent voice in world affairs.

Discussing this issue Hawkes Bay Today May 31 states that a new poll shows 75% of New Zealanders agree with
Key. Lets see the poll, its news to me! Even if it was true it doesnt mean New Zealand should abandon the policy.

Related: A NuclearFree Moment

The article states the U.S. navy has boycotted NZ ports since 1986 and even after the ban of mutual navy exercises with the
U.S. was lifted in 2010 the U.S. still blocked our navy from berthing at naval base yards in Pearl Harbour forcing our wee
frigate to berth in a domestic wharf. How ridiculous! Call this country a friend, an ally?

The U.S. policy of hegemony over any country that displays independence from Washington neocon control, stops at nothing
to force servitude over any nation.

The abandonment of our nuclear free status immediately places our sovereign nation at risk in the incidence of a nuclear war
and believe me when I say this is the madness that is driving Washington policy right now. John Key has no right to be
pandering to Washington demands and expectations giving away New Zealands years of hard fought independent nuclear
free policy.
Wake up readers to the fact that right now the U.S. is placing right along the borders of Russia, in Poland, Romania and the
Latvian countries a massive military build up including thousands of U.S. personnel, tanks, armoured vehicles and missiles
aimed at Russia.

The madmen/women of Washington believe they can win a nuclear war with Russia! These insane people are agents of the
U.S. military/industrial complex and this policy is to force Russia into submission to Washington control over its resources
and is being repeated also with China in regard to the man made islands in the South China Sea.

The United States treats any independence from its dominance as unacceptable and will not allow independent policy
without punishing that country in some way, just as it has attempted to do with New Zealands nuclear free policy, a
laughable response really to such a small country saying no not here thanks.
Servitude is delivered by way of economic sanctions to weaken a nations economy as it was with Iran over nuclear energy
policy when there was no threat (New Zealand had to abandon its burgeoning trade with Iran for years until sanctions were
lifted) and again with Russia over the western media trumped up lie that Russia had invaded the Ukraine when all along it
was Washington and the CIA that was funding and supporting the coup in Ukraine in February 2014.

Or it is direct military intervention as in Afghanistan, chasing Osama bin Laden who from a cave managed to out smart the
most sophisticated air defense system in the world on 9/11, or Iraq with the weapons of mass destruction lie, or Libya where
Colonel Gadaffi dared to suggest that Arab nations should trade their oil in anything but U.S. dollars, or Syria where the U.S.
seeks regime change as once parroted by John Key after one of his Obama golf games, or Yemen where its agents in Saudi
Arabia are causing genocide against Shia Muslims or in Somalia.
No one in their right mind could believe the U.S. is battling
around the world to spread freedom and democracy
because the freedom and democracy of the last Bush
administration retained by Obama has resulted in millions
dead or maimed, whole countries of Arab lands destroyed
and refugee crisis that is changing the face of European
life.

The U.S. military / industrial complex and the politicians that


pay homage to it deliver death all over the world wherever it
is engaged. We should not be re-engaging with them now!

Key is a product of Wall Street, his millions were made


trading in U.S. financial circles.

While this is not a criticism he is well schooled, has been


well paid to deliver New Zealand into servitude to
Washington influence and policy.

Little by little New Zealand succumbs to U.S. influences that


prepare us only for war and death.

Just take a look at your TV tonight, any night, to hear the news.

It is virtually 100% feed from U.S. mainstream, propaganda fed right to your lounge every night, missing out the real things
going on in the world and serving up lightweight trivia of no importance, accept to vilify Russia and cast a bad light upon
China, worse for North Korea.

The trash that is served up as programming entertainment is all about conflict, murder and dominant military prowess as
brave Americans save the downtrodden in foreign lands.

We are being slowly submersed into servitude once more regarding our nuclear free stance and as an aside to the nuclear
warship issue this is happening with the TPPA, a treaty (called a partnership, the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement)
between nations that our local MP still calls a trade agreement.

The word trade doesnt get a look in with the title! It is a treaty outlining the way American corporates can over ride the
wishes of an electorate in tribunals outside the jurisdiction of sovereign nations This is the economic part of hegemony, to
completely dominate and control a foreign country but our western politicians are too blind or stupid to see this.

That is why any move to embrace more U.S. influence is something to be rejected, it can only lead to our nation becoming a
target more than it is with the established surveillance posts being a target already.
Message From Iraqi Children To America And The World + Israeli IDF Colonel Leading
ISIS Terrorists Arrested In Iraq
June 15 2016 | From: FarsNews / Youtube / GlobalResearch

The security and popular forces have held captive an Israeli colonel, a commander of Iraqs
popular mobilization forces. The Zionist officer is ranked colonel and had participated in the Takfiri
ISIL groups terrorist operations, he added.

Noting that he was arrested along with a number of ISIL terrorists, the commander said, The Israeli colonels name
is Yusi Oulen Shahak and is ranked colonel in Golani Brigade of the Zionist regimes army with the security and
military code of Re34356578765az231434. Note: Some of this material in this article collection is a few months old
- but this has no bearing on the content.

Related: The Bush / Cheney / Rumsfeld Strategy for Iraq

Guess Who is Behind the Islamic State: Israeli IDF Colonel Leading ISIS Terrorists Arrested in Iraq

He said that the relevant bodies are now interrogating the Israeli colonel to understand the reasons behind his fighting
alongside the ISIL forces and the presence of other Zionist officers among ISIL terrorists.

Message From Iraqi Children To America And The World

The Iraqi security forces said the captured colonel has already made shocking confessions.
Several ISIL militants arrested in the last one year had already confessed that Israeli agents from Mossad and other Israeli
espionage and intelligence bodies were present in the first wave of ISIL attacks on Iraq and capture of Mosul in Summer
2014, but no ranking Israeli agent had been arrested.

Political and military experts told FNA that the capture of the Israeli colonel will leave a grave impact on Iraqs war strategy,
including partnership with Israeli allies.

In a relevant development in July, Iraqi volunteer forces announced that they had shot down a drone that was spying on the
Arab countrys security forces in the city of Fallujah, Western Iraq.

Iraqs popular forces reported that they had brought down a hostile surveillance aircraft over the Southeastern Fallujah in
Anbar Province.

They said that the wreckage of the ISILs spy drone carried Israel-Made labels. This was not the first Israeli-made drone
downed in Iraq. In August 2015 an Israeli Hermes drone was shot down in the vicinity of Baghdad Airport.

Delivery Of US Weapons And Ammunition To ISIS: Iraqi Commander Wiretaps ISIS


Communications With US Military
A commander of Iraqs popular forces disclosed that wiretapping of ISILs communications has confirmed the
reports that the US planes have been airdropping food and arms supplies for the Takfiri terrorists.

Related: Caught in the Act: US Plane Airdrops Arms Intended for Daesh in Iraq

The wiretapped ISIL communications by Iraqi popular forces have revealed that the US planes have been
dropping weapons and foodstuff for the Takfiri terrorist group, Commander of Iraqs Ali Akbar Battalion told FNA.

He noted that tapping on ISIL disclosed the terrorist groups regular contacts with the US army, and said:

They exchanged sentences like if they would have a share of the ammunition dropped near (Spiker Military Base)
or responses such as you will also receive your share.

The US forces by dropping weapons and ammunition for ISIL, specially in Yassreb, Al-Ramadi and near Spiker
Base in Hay al-Qadessiya have provided a lot of help to the ISIL, he added.

Many similar reports by Iraqi officials and forces have surfaced in the last few months.

In February, an Iraqi provincial official lashed out at the western countries and their regional allies for supporting Takfiri
terrorists in Iraq, revealing that the US airplanes still continue to airdrop weapons and foodstuff for the ISIL terrorists.
The US planes have dropped weapons for the ISIL terrorists in the areas under ISIL control and even in those
areas that have been recently liberated from the ISIL control to encourage the terrorists to return to those
places, Coordinator of Iraqi popular forces Jafar al-Jaberi told FNA.

He noted that eyewitnesses in Al-Havijeh of Kirkuk province had witnessed the US airplanes dropping several suspicious
parcels for ISIL terrorists in the province.

Two coalition planes were also seen above the town of Al-Khas in Diyala and they carried the Takfiri terrorists to
the region that has recently been liberated from the ISIL control, Al-Jaberi said.

Meantime, Head of Iraqi Parliaments National Security and Defense Committee Hakem al-Zameli also disclosed that the
anti-ISIL coalitions planes have dropped weapons and foodstuff for the ISIL in Salahuddin, Al-Anbar and Diyala provinces.
In January, al-Zameli underlined that the coalition is the main cause of ISILs survival in Iraq.

There are proofs and evidence for the US-led coalitions military aid to ISIL terrorists through air(dropped
cargoes), he told FNA at the time.

He noted that the members of his committee have already proved that the US planes have dropped advanced weaponry,
including anti-aircraft weapons, for the ISIL, and that it has set up an investigation committee to probe into the matter.

The US drops weapons for the ISIL on the excuse of not knowing about the whereabouts of the ISIL positions and
it is trying to distort the reality with its allegations."

He noted that the committee had collected the data and the evidence provided by eyewitnesses, including Iraqi
army officers and the popular forces, and said, These documents are given to the investigation committee and
the necessary measures will be taken to protect the Iraqi airspace.

Also in January, another senior Iraqi legislator reiterated that the US-led coalition is the main cause of ISILs survival in Iraq.

The international coalition is only an excuse for protecting the ISIL and helping the terrorist group with equipment
and weapons, Jome Divan, who is member of the al-Sadr bloc in the Iraqi parliament, said.

He said the coalitions support for the ISIL is now evident to everyone, and continued, The coalition has not
targeted ISILs main positions in Iraq.
In Late December, Iraqi Parliamentary Security and Defense Commission MP disclosed that a US plane supplied the ISIL
terrorist organization with arms and ammunition in Salahuddin province.

MP Majid al-Gharawi stated that the available information pointed out that US planes are supplying ISIL organization, not
only in Salahuddin province, but also other provinces, Iraq TradeLink reported.

He added that the US and the international coalition are:

Not serious in fighting against the ISIL organization, because they have the technological power to determine the
presence of ISIL gunmen and destroy them in one month.

Gharawi added that the US is trying to expand the time of the war against the ISIL to get guarantees from the Iraqi
government to have its bases in Mosul and Anbar provinces.

Salahuddin security commission also disclosed that unknown planes threw arms and ammunition to the ISIL gunmen
Southeast of Tikrit city.

Also in Late December, a senior Iraqi lawmaker raised doubts about the seriousness of the anti-ISIL coalition led by the US,
and said that the terrorist group still received aids dropped by unidentified aircraft.

The international coalition is not serious about air strikes on ISIL terrorists and is even seeking to take out the
popular (voluntary) forces from the battlefield against the Takfiris so that the problem with ISIL remains unsolved in
the near future, Nahlah al-Hababi told FNA.
The ISIL terrorists are still receiving aids from unidentified fighter jets in Iraq and Syria, she added.

Hababi said that the coalitions precise airstrikes are launched only in those areas where the Kurdish Pishmarga forces are
present, while military strikes in other regions are not so much precise.

In late December, the US-led coalition dropped aids to the Takfiri militants in an area North of Baghdad.

Field sources in Iraq told al-Manar that the international coalition airplanes dropped aids to the terrorist militants in Balad, an
area which lies in Salahuddin province North of Baghdad.

In October, a high-ranking Iranian commander also slammed the US for providing aid supplies to ISIL, adding that the US
claims that the weapons were mistakenly airdropped to ISIL were untrue.

The US and the so-called anti-ISIL coalition claim that they have launched a campaign against this terrorist and
criminal group while supplying them with weapons, food and medicine in Jalawla region (a town in Diyala
Governorate, Iraq). This explicitly displays the falsity of the coalitions and the US claims, Deputy Chief of Staff of
the Iranian Armed Forces Brigadier General Massoud Jazayeri said.

The US claimed that it had airdropped weapons and medical aid to Kurdish fighters confronting the ISIL in Kobani, near the
Turkish border in Northern Syria.
The US Defense Department said that it had airdropped 28 bundles of weapons and supplies, but one of them did not make
it into the hands of the Kurdish fighters.

Video footage later showed that some of the weapons that the US airdropped were taken by ISIL militants.

The Iranian commander insisted that the US had the necessary intelligence about ISILs deployment in the region and that
their claims to have mistakenly airdropped weapons to them are as unlikely as they are untrue.

Related: We Didn't Need to Wait for Chilcot, Blair Lied to us About Iraq. Here's the Evidence

Worst Mass Shooting In US History Leaves 50 Dead, Many Wounded At Orlando Gay
Club - Shooter Pledged ISIS Allegiance + Shooter An Employee Of CIA Front Company
Wackenhut / G4S - False Flag / Sacrificial Lamb?
June 14 2016 | From: AustralianNationalReview / Inforwars

A shooting rampage at an Orlando, Florida nightclub early Sunday left approximately 50 people
dead, including the gunman, and 42 injured, authorities said.
At a 7 AM EDT news conference, Police Chief John Mina said the shooting began at 2:02 a.m., when three police
officers engaged in a gun battle with a suspect outside Orlando Pulse, an LGBTQ club just south of downtown.

Related: Orlando shooting: 50 killed, shooter pledged ISIS allegiance

A hostage situation then took place inside, and a SWAT team was called in, Mina said. Police received updates from
patrons trapped in the club, and decided to storm the club at about 5 a.m.

We exchanged gunfire with the suspect, and he was dead at the scene, Mina said.

Javer Antonetti, 53, told the Orlando Sentinel that he was near the back of the dance club when he heard gunfire. There
were so many (shots), at least 40, he said. I saw two guys and it was constant, like pow, pow, pow,.

Mina said 42 people were transferred to local hospitals, and one officer was wounded. He estimated the death toll at 20, and
said at least 30 people were rescued.

Tonight our community witnessed a horrific crime that will have a lasting effect on our community, Orlando
Mayor Buddy Dyer said.

Do we consider this an act of terrorism? Absolutely, we are investigating this from all parties perspective as an
act of terrorism, said Danny Banks, special agent in charge of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement Danny
Banks.

We can confirm this is a mass casualty situation. Support from local/state/federal agencies, Orlando police
tweeted about four hours after events began to unfold. Then, a short time later: Pulse Shooting: The shooter
inside the club is dead.
Orlandos annual weeklong Gay Days festival ended on June 6 in which up to 150,000 in the LGBTQ community come from
over the world for the 25th anniversary of Gay Days. It is one of the largest gay pride events in the world.

Orlando Shooting Suspect Identified As Omar Mateen, Registered Democrat Of Afghan


Descent With Firearm License

The suspected gunman in todays gruesome Orlando nightclub shooting which killed approximately 20 people
has been identified by relatives and law enforcement officials as Omar Mateen, a 29-year-old from Fort Pierce,
Florida, CBS reports.

Related: Donald Trump Seizes on Orlando Shooting and Repeats Call for Temporary Ban on Muslim Migration

According to social media, he is a US citizen, born in 1986, from Port Saint Lucie, FL. and both his parents are from
Afghanistan. He was a registered democrat with a security officer and firearms license.

The Orlando Mayor says he used an assault rifle, while Florida Congressman Alan Grayson adds that he believes the attack
is more likely than not ideologically motivated.

Related: Orlando Killer Worked For Company Transporting Illegal Immigrants Inside US; Was Interviewed By FBI 3
Times

According to BBC, Mateen was not on any terrorism watch list, although as CBS also adds Islamic terrorism is being
investigated as one of the possible motives behind the mass shooting. CNN adds that the suspected Orlando gunman was
trained in use of weapons.

Some more details on the alleged shooter as disclosed on Find the Data, disclose that he was a registered Democrat in the
18th Congressional District.

A search of the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services database reveals that Mateen had security officer
and firearms licenses:
Is Orlando a False Flag? Update: Shooter An Employee Of CIA Front Company
Wackenhut / G4S - False Flage / Sacrificial Lamb?
Orlando nightclub shooting: Yet another false flag?

It sure walks, talks and quacks like one

Related: Orlando Shootings Mask Clinton Hijacking of California Primary

Theyre calling it the worst terror attack since 9/11. A Muslim is being blamed for shooting up a gay nightclub in Orlando,
Florida, killing more than fifty people.

In the recently-published Another French False Flag, former CIA clandestine services officer Robert David Steele who
admits he executed on false flag operation for the Agency lists ten key indicators of a modern false flag.

The most important is #10: Who benefits? So lets start there. [ Read full article ]

Update 2: An alert reader has pointed out that only the stupid would accept the video taped pledge of allegiance to ISIS at
face value. In a clandestine environment, the shooter could be told that he is auditioning for a possible operational
promotion, and asked to do this, even given a script. A prospective candidate for access agent status going against ISIS
would be assigned to increase mosque attendance and signs of commitment. There is NOTHING so far that suggests this
individual had anything against gays or any reason to actually target gays. All signs point to a false flag event.

Update 2: An alert reader has pointed out that the shooter (who was killed on site and cannot speak for himself) was an
employee of a known CIA front company and ally, Wackenhut / G4S. Wackenhut, which manages prisons among other
capabilities, is perfectly positioned to provide men without a country or relatives, and to provide men who can be mentally
incapacitated or conditioned for special duties.

See Also:

Orlando Killer Worked For Company Transporting Illegal Immigrants Inside US; Was Interviewed By FBI 3 Times

Orlando nightclub shooter worked for government security contractor

Phi Beta Iota: We are particularly impressed by the connections that Dr. Barrett draws between Robert Steeles who
benefits test question, and the radical contrast between the past week of celebrating Muhamad Ali. This mass murder is
exactly what one can expect from amoral individuals who want to force the US hand in relation to putting troops on the
ground against ISIS in Syria.

What the public does not understand is that ISIS is a creation of Saudi Arabia and the USA, and the objective in Syria is to
make possible a Saudi pipeline to the sea. Israel supports the destabilization of Syria because that is consistent with its
grand strategy to destabilize the Middle East.

We have not seen the bodies and therefore doubt very much the veracity of the official narrative. We are pretty certain the
FBI will not do serious forensics that could reveal multiple shooters, so this will be another coverup, just like the
assassination of JFK, the assassination of MLK, the USS Cole, 9/11, and other recent false flags.

See Also:

False Flags @ Phi Beta Iota

Orlando Shooting- Paul Craig Roberts

Heavily armed man arrested while heading to harm LA gay pride event

Man 'Cut Off' Live On Air, After Saying Someone Was Holding Doors Closed at Pulse Night Club

Utility Smart Meters - A Probable Terrorist Connection Unveiled?


June 11 2016 | From: ActivistPost

All throughout the USA - plus globally - informed and concerned citizens are refusing AMI smart
meters for electric, natural gas, and municipal water utility services, which are provided using a
Marxist-draconian-like edict and rollout by utility companies that want to cash in on the funding
they can receive from the feds to institute what amounts to an apparent first leg push for the
global smart grid and Internet of Things (IoT)

The IoT is designed to track everyones every interaction at all times - in your car (transponders and E-Z Pass); on
your computers - specifically Windows 10 backdoors that apparently allow the feds access to your computer;
through your smart home appliances - especially TVs; plus a human RFID microchip surgically imbedded
somewhere inside your body to enforce a cashless society, tracking, and an obvious ultimate control mechanism
over every human!

Related: The Disturbingly Aggressive Roll Out Of Smart AKA Advanced Meters - While Children Starve And The
Elderly Freeze In Rural Aotearoa (NZ)

That IoT sure beats what Karl Marx, Adolph Hitler, and Joseph Stalin visualized and enforced! Why arent consumers
waking up to whats being done to us?

Furthermore, does the Draco-like (7th-century Athenian statesman and lawmaker, or his code of laws, which prescribed
death for almost every offence) push for vaccines starting as soon as a fetus exits the womb until one reaches advanced old
age play a part in any of this, especially vaccine nanoparticles?
Related: Seattle Suehawks: Smart meter hush-up launched because, er ... terrorism

However, one specific aspect of the dumb smart technology came into daylight recently because of whats been going on in
Seattle, Washington - terrorism associated with hacking smart systems. Hopefully, that aspect finally will register enough
concern in the hearts, minds, and souls of humans to enable us to recognize, and seriously ponder, that we are being
downsized into zombies or human robots!

The issue thats raised security concerns, plus hackles, at corporate levels is the fact that utility companies smart meter
technology is being equated with terroristic capabilities! Read that again and let it sink into the very depths of your being.

All those dumb smart gadgets we cant live without, and everyone has bought into, pose severe capabilities for terrorists
hacking, plus a total takeover of the grid! How do you like them apples?
Related: Britains IoD: Smart Meters Are A Government IT Disaster Waiting To Happen

The quintessential Pandoras Box is nothing compared with smart technology and its capabilities of being hacked at every
level of communication. How do we know that?

Well, its been revealed that when Seattle City Light, a public power utility in Washington State, was asked by an activist for
their smart meter and grid details, etc., in order to find out what kind of safety and security safeguards were built in by smart
meter suppliers Landis+Gyr and Sensus USA, that request wound up in a rather bizarre legal battle!

Why?

Heres the story of activist Phil Moceks request for smart meter information that ran into legal troubles. However, Id like to
cut to what may be the real deal about not releasing those plans, etc:

The smart meter suppliers objected to the release of the information on the grounds that the unredacted
documents would disclose their trade secrets and open the public to terrorist attacks on their infrastructure."

As a result of smart meter suppliers/manufacturers legal actions, this is where the issue currently stands:

Mocek was given a mix of unredacted and redacted documents by the city, the meter makers complained,
whereas he should only have received and published files they had censored.

Seattle officials said they were not skilled enough to know for sure which parts to redact, so left it to the suppliers
to edit the files yet, unredacted information managed to make its way into Moceks hands and onto the internet.
Landis+Gyr and Sensus promptly sued the city, Mocek and Muckrock, and filed for an injunction: ultimately, the
suppliers wanted the documents taken down, and the unredacted copies banned from public view.

On Thursday, a temporary restraining order was granted by the King County Superior Court in Washington and
Muckrock founder Michael Morisy confirmed the unredacted documents have been taken down pending the
outcome of the case."

Related: Hundreds Of Smart Meters Simultaneously Explode

However, there seems to be some element of naivety involved regarding all this, I offer, and the following leads me to that
conclusion:

In the meantime, however, Mocek also has some additional problems to deal with, thanks to the legal wrangling.
Though he has filed similar information requests in the past, he says he has never had to face a lawsuit simply
because he wanted to look at public records and keep a local utility honest.

I dont think [Seattle City Light] are going to put a device on my house to spy on me, he quipped. I think they are
being bamboozled by vendors who want to make a lot of money by replacing thousands of meters.

Related: As US court bans smart meter blueprints from public, sysadmin tells of fight for security info

To which I offer: I think Mr. Mocek and everyone else needs to reconsider the spy on me aspect. How nave are we, if we
dont put two and two together and come up with the correct answer? Utility companies are providing customers smart
meter information to others, as a California utility admits:

This data is very valuable because it can reveal patterns about what you do and when. California
utility companies admitted they are providing smart meter data to the government and third parties."

Theres a 4.3 minute video explaining what smart meters really can and do, regarding surveillance of customers homes
in this website. Its found under Privacy invasion.
However, I need to tell readers that my computer surveillance package wont allow me to copy and paste that video URL
into this article! Interesting? No - my computer is compromised as, apparently, all computers are of those who do the type
of work I do.

CIA Director Calls Smart Grid Stupid Due to Security Problems

If the Smart Grid is that stupid, then there must be some ulterior Faustian reason for it to be mandated and installed,
wouldnt you say? No one can be that damn dumb to mandate a system that can cause more harm, especially in the area
of personal privacy and national security. Havent we learned anything from nine-eleven?

You no doubt have heard about people who live in glass houses and their vulnerabilities.

Well, your house, no matter what its made of, will become a crystal clear, see-through structure to all who
want to know about your every moment, movement, occupancy times, and use of smart gadgets and, in
turn, broadcast that information via hackable cell phone technology in smart meters and, ultimately, sell
that personal information without your knowledge and permission to third parties; plus open your privacy,
life, and home to burglars, thieves, and government or foreign hackers.

Is that the price we are willing to pay for buying into all the dumb smart technology being forced upon us?

I think every homeowner should file a formal complaint with their utility company and public utility commission informing
them that they must obtain an official court order in order to be able to access your personal information via a smart meter.

Basically, its a surveillance device! Enforce your lawful rights!

Related: Reports Of Illness Prompt Audit Of Smart Meter Radiation

United States Government Intentionally Destroyed 9/11 Evidence


June 9 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / WashingtonsBlog

If the story that the US government told us about 9/11 were true, why did the government destroy
the evidence, lie to the 9/11 Commission, and prevent a real investigation?
The clear and indisputable answer is that if the evidence had not been destroyed and a real investigation had
occurred, the conclusion would have been that 9/11 was an inside job designed to give the neoconservatives their
new Pearl Harbor necessary to launch their wars in the Middle East.

Related: Is the War on Terror a Falsity?

The extraordinary gullibility of the American people is responsible for 15 years of warfare, destroyed countries, and millions
of dead, maimed, orphaned, and displaced people, and for the rise of a police state in the United States. The ignorance and
gullibility of the American people are responsible for these massive crimes against humanity and for Americans loss of their
constitutionall protections.

Presumption of a Cover-Up

Judges and lawyers know that if someone intentionally destroys evidence hes probably trying to hide his
crime. American law has long recognized that destruction of evidence raises a presumption of guilt for the person who
destroyed the evidence.
So what does it mean when the US government intentionally destroyed massive amounts of evidence related to 9/11?

Related: CIA Veteran Announces Live on RT That All Terrorist Attacks in US Are False Flags

Judge and Prosecutor Destroy Evidence

For example, it was revealed last week that the judge overseeing the trial of surviving 9/11 suspects conspired with the
prosecution to destroy evidence relevant to a key suspects defense. And see this.

(The Defense Department has also farmed out most of the work of both prosecuting and defending the surviving 9/11
suspects to the same private company. And the heads of the military tribunal prosecuting the 9/11 suspects said that the
trials must be rigged so that there are no acquittals.)

Destruction of Videotapes

The CIA videotaped the interrogation of 9/11 suspects, falsely told the 9/11 Commission that there were no videotapes or
other records of the interrogations, and then illegally destroyed all of the tapes and transcripts of the interrogations.
Related: Obama Administration Caught Conspiring to Destroy Key 9/11 Evidence in Trial at Gitmo

9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton wrote:

Those who knew about those videotapes - and did not tell us about them - obstructed our investigation."

And:

Daniel Marcus, a law professor at American University who served as general counsel for the Sept. 11
commission and was involved in the discussions about interviews with Al Qaeda leaders, said he had heard
nothing about any tapes being destroyed."

If tapes were destroyed, he said, its a big deal, its a very big deal, because it could amount to obstruction of
justice to withhold evidence being sought in criminal or fact-finding investigations."

Related: How the CIA Writes History

Destruction of Air Traffic Control Tapes

The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand,
cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building as shown by this
NY Times article (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view) and by this article from the Chicago Sun-Times.
Black Boxes

The FBI long ago found and analyzed the black box recorders from the airplanes which hit the Twin Towers, but
has consistently denied that they were ever found.

Pentagon Fibs

The 9/11 Commissioners concluded that officials from the Pentagon lied to the Commission, and considered
recommending criminal charges for such false statements.

Soviet-Style Minders

The chairs of both the 9/11 Commission and the Official Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 said that Soviet-style government
minders obstructed the investigation into 9/11 by intimidating witnesses (and see this).

In other words, the minders obstructed witnesses from openly and candidly talking about what they knew.

Undermining Investigation

President Bush and Vice-President Cheney took the rare step of personally requesting that congress limit all 9/11
investigation solely to intelligence failures.
The administration also opposed the creation of a 9/11 commission. Once it was forced (by pressure from widows of 9-11
victims) to allow a commission to be formed, the administration appointed as executive director an administration insider,
whose area of expertise is the creation and maintenance of public myths thought to be true, even if not actually true, who
was involved in pre-9/11 intelligence briefings, and who was one of the key architects of the pre-emptive war doctrine.

This executive director, who controlled what the Commission did and did not analyze, then limited the scope of the
Commissions inquiry so that the overwhelming majority of questions about 9/11 remained unasked (see this and this).

The administration then starved the commission of funds. The government spent $175 million over $300 million in todays
dollars investigating the Challenger space shuttle disaster. It spent $152 million on the the Columbia disaster
investigation. It spent $30 million investigating the Monica Lewinsky scandal. But the government only authorized $15
million for the 9/11 Commission.
The government also failed to provide crucial documents to the 9/11 investigators. And see this.

The government refused to share much information with the Commission, refused to force high-level officials to testify under
oath, and allowed Bush and Cheney to be questioned jointly.

Moreover, as reported by ACLU, FireDogLake, RawStory and many others, declassified documents shows that Senior
Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001.

The 9-11 Commission took this warning to heart, and refused to examine virtually any evidence which contradicted the
administrations official version of events. As stated by the State Departments Coordinator for Counterterrorism who was
the point man for the U.S. governments international counterterrorism policy in the first term of the Bush administration
there were things the [9/11] commissions wanted to know about and things they didnt want to know about.

Saudi Role
Investigation into Saudi government aid to 9/11 conspirators was also obstructed.

For example, Philip Shenon the 20-year New York Times reporter who wrote a book on the 9/11 Commission reports:

The [911] commissioner said the renewed public debate could force a spotlight on a mostly unknown chapter of
the history of the 9/11 commission: behind closed doors, members of the panels staff fiercely protested the
way the material about the Saudis was presented in the final report, saying it underplayed or ignored
evidence that Saudi officials especially at lower levels of the government were part of an al-Qaida
support network that had been tasked to assist the hijackers after they arrived in the US.

In fact, there were repeated showdowns, especially over the Saudis, between the staff and the
commissions hard-charging executive director, University of Virginia historian Philip Zelikow, who joined
the Bush administration as a senior adviser to the secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, after leaving the
commission.

The staff included experienced investigators from the FBI, the Department of Justice and the CIA, as well as the
congressional staffer who was the principal author of the 28 pages.

Zelikow fired a staffer, who had repeatedly protested over limitations on the Saudi investigation, after she
obtained a copy of the 28 pages outside of official channels.

Other staffers described an angry scene late one night, near the end of the investigation, when two
investigators who focused on the Saudi allegations were forced to rush back to the commissions offices
after midnight after learning to their astonishment that some of the most compelling evidence about a
Saudi tie to 9/11 was being edited out of the report or was being pushed to tiny, barely readable footnotes
and endnotes.
The staff protests were mostly overruled.

***

But Kean, Hamilton and Zelikow clearly do not speak for a number of the other commissioners, who have
repeatedly suggested they are uncomfortable with the perception that the commission exonerated Saudi
Arabia and who have joined in calling for public release of the 28 pages."

Indeed, an FBI informant hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000. Specifically, investigators for the Congressional
Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when
the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and
that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House.

As the New York Times notes:

Senator Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat who is a former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee,
accused the White House on Tuesday of covering up evidence.

The accusation stems from the Federal Bureau of Investigations refusal to allow investigators for a Congressional
inquiry and the independent Sept. 11 commission to interview an informant, Abdussattar Shaikh, who had been the
landlord in San Diego of two Sept. 11 hijackers."
Letting Terrorists Go Free

A former FBI translator who Senators Leahy and Grassley, among others, have claimed is credible, and who the
administration has gagged for years without any logical basis - has stated that this administration knowingly and
intentionally let many directly or indirectly involved in that terrorist act [September 11th] go free untouched and
uninvestigated?

Destruction of Physical Evidence

The former head of fire science and engineering for the agency responsible for finding out why the Twin Towers and World
Trade Center 7 collapsed on 9/11 (the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology) who is one of the worlds
leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, with a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering wrote that evidence
necessary to determine the cause of the collapse of the World Trade Centers was being destroyed. And see this.

Note the demolition charges going off...

In addition, the official investigators themselves were largely denied access to the site and the evidence contained there, or
even access to such basic information as the blueprints for the World Trade Center.

The government has also refused to release the computer models showing how the trade centers fell, making it impossible
for anyone to double-check its assumptions.
Whether you believe the Twin Towers and World Trade Center building 7 were brought down with explosives or by airplanes
and fires, destroying evidence prevented engineers and scientists from figuring out what went wrong to prevent
skyscrapers from collapsing in the future.

9/11 Commissioners Disgusted and Call For a New Investigation

The 9/11 Commissioners publicly expressed anger at cover ups and obstructions of justice by the government into
a real 9/11 investigation:

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says I dont believe for a minute we got everything right, that the
Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate
should continueThe 9/11 Commission chair said the Commission was set up to fail

The Commissions co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) obstructed our investigation
9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative
to what we outlined in our version . . . We didnt have access . . . .

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were
getting

9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: It is a national scandal; This
investigation is now compromised; and One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11
issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up. When asked in 2009 if he thought
there should be another 9/11 commission, Cleland responded: There should be about fifteen 9/11 commissions

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staffs inquiry said At some level
of the government, at some point in timethere was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened. He
also said I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described. The tapes told a radically
different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin. This is not true.

The Co-Chair of the congressional investigation into 9/11 Bob Graham and 9/11 Commissioner and former
Senator Bob Kerrey are calling for either a PERMANENT 9/11 commission or a new 9/11 investigation to get to
the bottom of it

9/11 Commissioner John Lehman says that a new investigation should be vigorously pursued

Planting False Evidence

Planting false evidence is another act which creates presumption of guilt.


The type of torture used by the U.S. on alleged surviving 9/11 co-conspirators is of a special type. Senator Levin revealed
that the the U.S. used Communist torture techniques specifically aimed at creating FALSE confessions. (and
see this, this, this and this).

According to NBC News:

Much of the 9/11 Commission Report was based upon the testimony of people who were tortured

At least four of the people whose interrogation figured in the 9/11 Commission Report have claimed that they told
interrogators information as a way to stop being tortured

One of the Commissions main sources of information was tortured until he agreed to sign a confession that he
was NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO READ

The 9/11 Commission itself doubted the accuracy of the torture confessions, and yet kept their doubts to
themselves

Pulitzer-prize winning reporter Seymour Hersh who broke the Iraq torture and Vietnam massacre stories writes:

Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues that were uncovered about the terrorists identities
and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found.

A former high-level intelligence official told me, Whatever trail was left was left deliberately - for the F.B.I. to
chase.

UK Trains Or Arms Half The Countries On Its List Of Human Rights Abusers
May 29 2016 | From: Anitmedia

New research has shown the U.K. is providing military training and support to over half the
countries named on its own watchlist of human rights abusers. An investigation by Campaign
Against Arms Trade (CAAT) and The Independent has revealed U.K. armed forces have trained
security and armed forces personnel from 16 of 30 regimes who are on a Foreign Office (FCO)
watch list for use of torture and violence.
The FCO publishes an annual report on Human Rights and Democracy that lists countries of wide-ranging
concern. While it is no secret the interests of the military-industrial complex come before human rights,
information obtained from the Ministry of Defence could arguably be satire if it werent so appalling.

The discovery that British soldiers have trained armed forces in over half the countries on its own human rights
watchlist warrants an even slower hand clap than Tony Blairs admission, weeks ahead of the Chilcot Inquiry, that his
understanding of the Middle East is a lot deeper today than when he was Prime Minister.
Despite horrific human rights records, the countries of concern benefiting from support from the British war machine
are listed as Afghanistan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Burma, Burundi, China, Colombia, Egypt, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Saudi
Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. Andrew Smith from CAAT said Britain should not be colluding with
countries it knows are led by authoritarian regimes, adding that the U.K. army has provided training to some of the most
authoritarian states in the world.

Further, evidence of the U.K governments support for violations of international humanitarian law by Saudi forces in Yemen
came to light through a British-made cluster bomb found in a Yemeni village. Despite the use of cluster bombs being banned
under the Convention on Cluster Munitions (to which the U.K. is a State Party) the unexploded munition was discovered
by Amnesty International during the inspection of a village in northern Yemen.
Originally manufactured in the 1970s, the weapon contains 147 bomblets that scatter across a wide area and often do not
detonate until disturbed at a later date.

The U.K. is thought to have sold large numbers of cluster munitions to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE)
since the 1980s. Even if the weapons were sold before Britain became a signatory to the Convention, Britain should take
responsibility for weapons previously supplied. Better still, the country should honour its claim to have one of the most
robust arms export controls in the world - and at least attempt to rein in the industry profiting from death and destruction all
over the world.

Saudi Press: The United States Blew Up World Trade Center To Create War On Terror
May 25 2016 | From: Breitbart

This is happening in real time. Last week the US Senate voted to allow the Saudi's to be sued for
9/11. Now we have Saudia Arabia coming out and saying the US alone created 9/11. Cabal
infighting escalating?
The Saudi press is still furious over the U.S. Senates unanimous vote approving a bill that allows the families of
9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia. This time, the London-based Al-Hayat daily has claimed that the U.S. planned the
attacks on the World Trade Center in order to create a global war on terror.

Related: Hyping of Saudi role in 9/11 a diversionary tactic by U.S. and Israel

The article, written by Saudi legal expert Katib al-Shammari and translated by MEMRI, claims that American threats to
expose documents that prove Saudi involvement in the attacks are part of a long-standing U.S. policy that he calls victory
by means of archives.

Al-Shammari claims that the U.S. chooses to keep some cards close to its chest in order to use them at a later date. One
example is choosing not to invade Iraq in the 1990s and keeping its leader, Saddam Hussein, alive to use as a bargaining
chip against other Gulf States. Only once Shiism threatened to sweep the region did America act to get rid of
Hussein since they no longer saw him as an ace up their sleeve.
[Comment: This is not to say that 9/11 was solely a machination of the United States Government. The Saudi's were
involved - but it was not them alone of course. Israel and it's Mossad were also involved. Ultimately, it was not so
much an effort of particular countries, rather it was driven by the 'Illuminati' NWO 'Cabal' agenda which operates
beyond national boundaries.]

He claims that the 9/11 attacks were another such card, enabling the U.S. to blame whoever suited its needs at a particular
time; first it blamed Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, then Saddam Husseins regime in Iraq, and now Saudi Arabia.

September 11 is one of winning cards in the American archives, because all the wise people in the world who are
experts on American policy and who analyze the images and the videos [of 9/11] agree unanimously that what
happened in the [Twin] Towers was a purely American action, planned and carried out within the U.S.

Proof of this is the sequence of continuous explosions that dramatically ripped through both buildings Expert
structural engineers demolished them with explosives, while the planes crashing [into them] only gave the green
light for the detonation they were not the reason for the collapse.

But the U.S. still spreads blame in all directions."

Related: Saudi Press Just Accused US Govt of Blowing Up World Trade Centers as Pretext to Perpetual War

The intention of the attacks, writes al-Shammari in his conspiracy article, was to create an obscure enemy terrorism
which became what American presidents blamed for all their mistakes and that would provide justification for any dirty
operation in other countries.

The terror label was applied to Muslims even though it was Muslims who helped America defeat the Soviets and bring an
end to the Cold War, he writes.

The problem, asserts al-Shammari, is that the U.S. must always find a new impetus to have an adversary, for the
nature of the U.S. is that it cannot exist without an enemy.

Al-Shammaris article comes amid a torrent of vociferous articles in the Saudi press that range from accusing the U.S. of
being schizophrenic and in cahoots with Iran to publishing warnings that if passed, the Satanic bill would open the gates
of hell.

David Rockefeller Gloats About 9/11 in 1967


Related Articles:

WTC cameras, locks, electricity turned off weekend before 9/11

Fourteen Incredible Facts About 9/11

CIA Threatens 9/11 Researchers Who Discover Explosive Evidence

9/11 - Mission Accomplished

Trump: Bush Had Advanced Notice of 9/11

What Happened on the Planes on September 11, 2001? The 9/11 Commission Script Was Fabricated

Incontrovertible

From The Archives For ANZAC Day: All Wars Are Bankers' Wars
April 14 2015 | From: MichaelRivero / Various Sources

A very eloquent and relatively concise video discourse on how and why the title of this piece is so
tragically true, followed by a very detailed article for those who wish to read more.

This really is a must see / must read piece to be aware of the real history of banking and
warmongering over the last 100 years - along with the how and why such nefarious plans were
implemented; and to what ends.

This exposes the same plan that is being rolled out globally, not just in the United States.
"The common enemy of all human kind are private central banks issuing the public
currency as a loan at interest, and as history will show, they will do anything up to, and
including global war - to keep their lock on yours and your children's economic wellbeing
and productivity.

We are not a free society. Media will tell us that we are free, but we are not free.

We are slaves, our slave chains are made of paper - and that paper is the Federal Reserve
note [including the central bankster issued debt-based-notes of every other country]."

Too few of our leaders have tried to stand up to this system of enslavement, usually with lethal results. But if all of the people
of the world stood up at the same time and said "No more private central banks", it will come crashing down, just as slavery
did, just as rule by divine right did and we will be embarking on a new era in human history where the emphasis on human
development is on the people and not on the money junkies.

Related: Nothing To Celebrate In ANZAC: The Bloody History Of The British Empire

[Note: This does not mean we should not remember the dead, who were duped into giving their lives for lies.]

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but
leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back
again.

However, take it away from them, and all the fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this
world would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you wish to remain slaves of the Bankers and pay for the
cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits."

- Sir Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England in the 1920s, the second richest man in Britain

I know many people have a great deal of difficulty comprehending just how many wars are started for no other purpose than to
force private central banks onto nations, so let me share a few examples, so that you understand why the US Government is
mired in so many wars against so many foreign nations. There is ample precedent for this.

The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency act, which forced the colonists to
conduct their business only using printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England at interest.
Interest Bearing bank note from the Bank of England, 1764

"The bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing."

- William Paterson, founder of the Bank of England in 1694


After the revolution, the new United States adopted a
radically different economic system in which the government
issued its own value-based money, so that private banks like
the Bank of England were not siphoning off the wealth of the
people through interest-bearing bank notes.

"The refusal of King George 3rd to allow the


colonies to operate an honest money system, which
freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the
money manipulators, was probably the prime cause
of the revolution."

- Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father

Following the revolution, the US Government actually took


steps to keep the bankers out of the new government!

"Any person holding any office or any stock in any


institution in the nature of a bank for issuing or
discounting bills or notes payable to bearer or order,
cannot be a member of the House whilst he holds
such office or stock."

- Third Congress of the United States Senate,


23rd of December, 1793, signed by the
President, George Washington

But bankers are nothing if not dedicated to their schemes to


King George III
acquire your wealth, and know full well how easy it is to
corrupt a nation's leaders.

Just one year after Mayer Amschel Rothschild had uttered his infamous "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care
not who makes the laws", the bankers succeeded in setting up a new Private Central Bank called the First Bank of the United
States, largely through the efforts of the Rothschild's chief US supporter, Alexander Hamilton.
Founded in 1791, by the end of its twenty year charter the
First Bank of the United States had almost ruined the
nation's economy, while enriching the bankers.

Congress refused to renew the charter and signaled their


intention to go back to a state issued value based currency
on which the people paid no interest at all to any banker.

This resulted in a threat from Nathan Mayer Rothschild


against the US Government, "Either the application for
renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will
find itself involved in a most disastrous war."

Congress still refused to renew the charter for the First


Bank of the United States, whereupon Nathan Mayer
Rothschild railed, "Teach those impudent Americans a
lesson! Bring them back to colonial status!"

The British Prime Minister at the time, Spencer Perceval


was adamently opposed to war with the United States,
primarily because the majority of England's military might
was occupied with the ongoing Napoleonic wars.

Spencer Perceval was concerned that Britain might not


prevail in a new American war, a concern shared by many
in the British government.
Alexander Hamilton

The First Bank of the United States

Then, Spencer Perceval was assassinated (the only British Prime Minister to be assassinated in office) and replaced by
Robert Banks Jenkinson, the 2nd Earl of Liverpool, who was fully supportive of a war to recapture the colonies.
"If my sons did not want wars, there would be
none."

- Gutle Schnaper, wife of Mayer Amschel


Rothschild and mother of his five sons

Financed at virtually no interest by the Rothschild controlled


Bank of England, Britain then provoked the war of 1812 to
recolonize the United States and force them back into the
slavery of the Bank of England, or to plunge the United
States into so much debt they would be forced to accept a
new private central bank.
Click for larger image of the Geneva Gazette for July 1, 1812, reporting
And the plan worked. Even though the War of 1812 was won
on the assassination of Spencer Perceval together with the declaration
of the War of 1812 by the United States, Congress was forced to grant a new
charter for yet another private bank issuing the public
currency as loans at interest, the Second Bank of the United
States.

Once again, private bankers were in control of the nation's money supply and cared not who made the laws or how many
British and American soldiers had to die for it.

The Second Bank of the United States


Bank Note from the Second Bank of the United States

Once again the nation was plunged into debt, unemployment, and poverty by the predations of the private central bank, and in
1832 Andrew Jackson successfully campaigned for his second term as President under the slogan, "Jackson And No Bank!"
True to his word, Jackson succeeds in blocking the renewal of the charter for the Second Bank of the United States.

"Gentlemen! I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States. I have had men
watching you for a long time, and am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the
breadstuffs of the country.

When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me
that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true,
gentlemen, but that is your sin!

Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and
thieves. I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal, (bringing his fist down on the table) I will rout you
out!"

- Andrew Jackson, shortly before ending the charter of the Second Bank of the United States.

From the original minutes of the Philadelphia committee of citizens sent to meet with President Jackson (February
1834), according to Andrew Jackson and the Bank of the United States (1928) by Stan V. Henkels
Shortly after President Jackson (the only American President
to actually pay off the National Debt) ended the Second
Bank of the United States, there was an attempted
assassination which failed when both pistols used by the
assassin, Richard Lawrence, failed to fire.

Lawrence later said that with Jackson dead, "Money would


be more plenty."

President Zachary Taylor opposed the creation of a new


Private Central Bank, owing to the historical abuses of the
First and Second Banks of the United States.

"The idea of a national bank is dead, and will not be


revived in my time."

- Zachary Taylor

Taylor died on July 9, 1850 after eating a bowl of cherries


and milk rumored to have been poisoned. The symptoms he
displayed are consistent with acute arsenic poisoning.

President James Buchanan also opposed a private central


bank. During the panic of 1857 he attempted to set limits on
banks issuing more loans than they had actual funds, and to
require all issued bank notes to be backed by Federal
Government assets.

He was poisoned with arsenic and survived, although 38


News report of Jackson shutting down the Second Bank of the United other people at the dinner died.
States, Geneva Gazette, October 2, 1833
The public school system is as subservient to the bankers'
wishes to keep certain history from you, just as the corporate
media is subservient to Monsanto's wishes to keep the
dangers of GMOs from you, and the global warming cult's
wishes to conceal from you that the Earth has actually been
cooling for the last 16 years.

Thus is should come as little surprise that much of the real


reasons for the events of the Civil War are not well known to
the average American.

"The few who understand the system will either be


so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon
its favours that there will be no opposition from that
class, while on the other hand, the great body of
people, mentally incapable of comprehending the
tremendous advantage that capital derives from the
system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and
perhaps without even suspecting that the system is
inimical to their interests."

- The Rothschild brothers of London writing to


associates in New York, 1863
President Zachary Taylor, ca 1850 When the Confederacy seceded from the United States, the
bankers once again saw the opportunity for a rich harvest of
debt, and offered to fund Lincoln's efforts to bring the south
back into the union, but at 30% interest.

Lincoln remarked that he would not free the black man by


enslaving the white man to the bankers and using his
authority as President, issued a new government currency,
the greenback. This was a direct threat to the wealth and
power of the central bankers, who quickly responded.

Lincoln's Greenback - Click for larger image

President James Buchanon

"If this mischievous financial policy, which has its


origin in North America, shall become endurated
down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish
its own money without cost.

It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have


all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It
will become prosperous without precedent in the
history of the world.

The brains, and wealth of all countries will go to


North America. That country must be destroyed or it
will destroy every monarchy on the globe."

- The London Times responding to Lincoln's


decision to issue government Greenbacks to
finance the Civil War, rather than agree to
private banker's loans at 30% interest.

In 1872 New York bankers sent a letter to every bank in the


United States, urging them to fund newspapers that opposed
government-issued money (Lincoln's greenbacks).

"Dear Sir: It is advisable to do all in your power to sustain


such prominent daily and weekly newspapers... as will
oppose the issuing of greenback paper money, and that you
also withhold patronage or favors from all applicants who are
not willing to oppose the Government issue of money. Let
the Government issue the coin and the banks issue the
President Abraham Lincoln paper money of the country...

[T]o restore to circulation the Government issue of money, will be to provide the people with money, and will therefore
seriously affect your individual profit as bankers and lenders."

- Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler
"It will not do to allow the greenback, as it is called, to circulate as money any length of time, as we cannot control that." --
Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler "Slavery is likely to be abolished
by the war power, and chattel slavery destroyed.

This, I and my European friends are in favor of, for slavery is but the owning of labor and carries with it the care for the
laborer, while the European plan, led on by England, is for capital to control labor by controlling the wages. THIS CAN BE
DONE BY CONTROLLING THE MONEY."

- Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler

Goaded by the private bankers, much of Europe supported the Confederacy against the Union, with the expectation that
victory over Lincoln would mean the end of the Greenback. France and Britain considered an outright attack on the United
States to aid the confederacy, but were held at bay by Russia, which had just ended the serfdom system and had a state
central bank similar to the system the United States had been founded on.

Left free of European intervention, the Union won the war,


and Lincoln announced his intention to go on issuing
greenbacks.

Following Lincoln's assassination, the Greenbacks were


pulled from circulation and the American people forced to go
back to an economy based on bank notes borrowed at
interest from the private bankers.

Tsar Alexander II, who authorized Russian military


assistance to Lincoln, was subsequently the victim of
multiple attempts on his life in 1866, 1879, and 1880, until
his assassination in 1881.

With the end of Lincoln's Greenbacks, the US could no


longer create its own interest free money and was
manipulated during the term of President Ruthford B. Hayes
into borrowing from the Rothschilds banking system in 1878,
restoring to the Rothschilds control of the US economy they
had lost under Andrew Jackson.

Messrs. Rothschild & Sons to Mr. Sherman.


[Cable message.]

April 12,1878.
Tsar Alexander II of Russia, who prevented France and Britain from Hon. John Sherman,
invading the US during the civil war. Secretary of the Treasury, Washington D. C.:

Very pleased we have entered into relations again


with American Government. Shall do our best to
make the business successful.

ROTHSCHILDS.

James A. Garfield was elected President in 1880 on a


platform of government control of the money supply.

"The chief duty of the National Government in


connection with the currency of the country is to coin
money and declare its value.
Grave doubts have been entertained whether
Congress is authorized by the Constitution to make
any form of paper money legal tender.

The present issue of United States notes has been


sustained by the necessities of war; but such paper
should depend for its value and currency upon its
convenience in use and its prompt redemption in
coin at the will of the holder, and not upon its
compulsory circulation.

These notes are not money, but promises to pay


money. If the holders demand it, the promise should
be kept."

- James Garfield

"By the experience of commercial nations in all ages


it has been found that gold and silver afford the only
safe foundation for a monetary system.

Confusion has recently been created by variations in


the relative value of the two metals, but I confidently
believe that arrangements can be made between
the leading commercial nations which will secure the
general use of both metals.

President James Garfield Congress should provide that the compulsory


coinage of silver now required by law may not
disturb our monetary system by driving either metal
out of circulation.

If possible, such an adjustment should be made that


the purchasing power of every coined dollar will be
exactly equal to its debt-paying power in all the
markets of the world."

- James Garfield

"He who controls the money supply of a nation


controls the nation."

- James Garfield

President William McKinley

Garfield was shot on July 2, 1881 and died of his wounds several weeks later. Chester A. Arthur succeeded Garfield as
President.
In 1896, William McKinley was elected President in the middle of a depression-driven debate over gold-backed government
currency versus bank notes borrowed at interest from private banks.

McKinley favored gold-backed currencies and a balanced government budget which would free the public from accumulating
debt.

"Our financial system needs some revision; our money is all good now, but its value must not further be
threatened.

It should all be put upon an enduring basis, not subject to easy attack, nor its stability to doubt or dispute. Our
currency should continue under the supervision of the Government.

The several forms of our paper money offer, in my judgment, a constant embarrassment to the Government and a
safe balance in the Treasury."

- William McKinley

McKinley was shot by an out-of-work anarchist on September 14, 1901, in Buffalo, NY, succumbing to his wounds a few days
later. He was suceeded in office by Theodore Roosevelt.

Finally, in 1913, the Private Central Bankers of Europe, in particular the Rothschilds of Great Britain and the Warburgs of
Germany, met with their American financial collaborators on Jekyll Island, Georgia to form a new banking cartel with the
express purpose of forming the Third Bank of the United States, with the aim of placing complete control of the United States
money supply once again under the control of private bankers.

Owing to hostility over the previous banks, the name was changed to "The Federal Reserve" system in order to grant the new
bank a quasi-governmental image, but in fact it is a privately owned bank, no more "Federal" than Federal Express.
The Federal Reserve; it is neither "Federal" nor does it have any actual "Reserves", creating as it does money out of thin air.

In 2012, the Federal Reserve attempted to rebuff a Freedom of Information Lawsuit by Bloomberg News on the grounds that
as a private banking corporation and not actually a part of the government, the Freedom of Information Act did not apply
to the "trade secret" operations of the Federal Reserve.

"When you or I write a check, there must be sufficient funds in our account to cover the check; but when the
Federal Reserve writes a check, there is no bank deposit on which that check is drawn. When the Federal Reserve
writes a check, it is creating money." -- From the Boston Federal Reserve Bank pamphlet, "Putting it Simply."

"Neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a 'dollar' bill is just a piece of paper.
Deposits are merely book entries."

- "Modern Money Mechanics Workbook" - Federal Reserve of Chicago, 1975

"I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can and do create money. And they who
control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hand the destiny of
the people."

- Reginald McKenna, as Chairman of the Midland Bank, addressing stockholders in 1924

"States, most especially the large hegemonic ones, such as the United States and Great Britain, are controlled by
the international central banking system, working through secret agreements at the Bank for International
Settlements (BIS), and operating through national central banks (such as the Bank of England and the Federal
Reserve)...

The same international banking cartel that controls the United States today previously controlled Great Britain and
held it up as the international hegemon.
When the British order faded, and was replaced by the United States, the US ran the global economy. However,
the same interests are served.

States will be used and discarded at will by the international banking cartel; they are simply tools."

- Andrew Gavin Marshall

1913 proved to be a transformative year for the nation's economy, first with the passage of the 16th "income tax"
Amendment and the false claim that it had been ratified.

"I think if you were to go back and and try to find and review the ratification of the 16th amendment, which was the
internal revenue, the income tax, I think if you went back and examined that carefully, you would find that a
sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment."

- U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox, Sullivan Vs. United States, 2003.

Later that same year, and apparently unwilling to risk another questionable amendment, Congress passed the Federal
Reserve Act over Christmas holiday 1913, while members of Congress opposed to the measure were at home.

This was a very underhanded deal, as the Constitution explicitly vests Congress with the authority to issue the public
currency, does not authorize its delegation, and thus should have required a new Amendment to transfer that authority to a
private bank.

But pass it Congress did, and President Woodrow Wilson signed it as he promised the bankers he would in exchange for
generous campaign contributions.
Woodrow Wilson later regretted that decision.

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined


my country.

A great industrial nation is now controlled by its


system of credit.

We are no longer a government by free opinion, no


longer a government by conviction and the vote of
the majority, but a government by the opinion and
duress of a small group of dominant men."

- Woodrow Wilson 1919

Thomas Edison, arguably the most brilliant man of the age,


was also well aware of the fraud of private central banks.

"People who will not turn a shovel full of dirt on the


project nor contribute a pound of material, will collect
more money from the United States than will the
People who supply all the material and do all the
work.

This is the terrible thing about interest ...


News report of Wilson's signing the Federal Reserve Act. Under the
Constitution, only a new Amendment could transfer the government's
But here is the point: If the Nation can issue a dollar
authority to create the currency to a private party. bond it can issue a dollar bill.

The element that makes the bond good makes the


bill good also.

The difference between the bond and the bill is that


the bond lets the money broker collect twice the
amount of the bond and an additional 20%.

Whereas the currency, the honest sort provided by


the Constitution pays nobody but those who
contribute in some useful way.

It is absurd to say our Country can issue bonds


and cannot issue currency.

Both are promises to pay, but one fattens the usurer


and the other helps the People.

If the currency issued by the People were no good,


then the bonds would be no good, either.

It is a terrible situation when the Government, to


insure the National Wealth, must go in debt and
submit to ruinous interest charges at the hands of
men who control the fictitious value of gold."

- Thomas A. Edison

The next year, World War One started, and it is


important to remember that prior to the creation of the
Federal Reserve, there was no such thing as a world
war.

President Woodrow Wilson

In 1913, the Rothschild KM was able to establish a beachhead by bribing crooked, treasonous members of Congress to pass the illegal,
Unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act on Christmas Eve without a required quorum. The Act was then signed by a crooked, bought off President, who
was a traitor to America, like the members of Congress who voted for it.
World War One started between Austria-Hungary and
Serbia with the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand.

Although the war started between Austria-Hungary and


Serbia, it quickly shifted to focus on Germany, whose
industrial capacity was seen as an economic threat to Great
Britain, who saw the decline of the British Pound as a result
of too much emphasis on financial activity to the neglect of
agriculture, industrial development, and infrastructure (not
unlike the present day United States).

Although pre-war Germany had a private central bank, it


was heavily restricted and inflation kept to reasonable
levels.

Under government control, investment was guaranteed to


internal economic development, and Germany was seen as
a major power.

So, in the media of the day, Germany was portrayed as the


prime opponent of World War One, and not just defeated,
but its industrial base flattened.

Following the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was ordered to


pay the war costs of all the participating nations, even
though Germany had not actually started the war.

This amounted to three times the value of all of Germany


Archduke Franz Ferdinand, whose assassination triggered World War itself.
One
Germany's private central bank, to whom Germany had
gone deeply into debt to pay the costs of the war, broke free
of government control, and massive inflation followed
(mostly triggered by currency speculators), permanently
trapping the German people in endless debt.

When the Weimar Republic collapsed economically, it


opened the door for the National Socialists to take power.

Their first financial move was to issue their own state


currency which was not borrowed from private central
bankers.

Freed from having to pay interest on the money in


circulation, Germany blossomed and quickly began to
rebuild its industry.

The media called it "The German Miracle".

TIME magazine lionized Hitler for the amazing improvement


in life for the German people and the explosion of German
industry, and even named him TIME Magazine's Man Of
The Year in 1938.

Once again, Germany's industrial output became a threat to


Great Britain.

Germany's state-issued value based currency was also a


direct threat to the wealth and power of the private central
banks, and as early as 1933 they started to organize a
global boycott against Germany to strangle this upstart
ruler who thought he could break free of private central
bankers!

Hitler as TIME's man of the year


"Should Germany merchandise (do business) again in the next 50 years we have led this war (WW1) in vain."

- Winston Churchill in The Times (1919)

"We will force this war upon Hitler, if he wants it or not."

- Winston Churchill (1936 broadcast)

"Germany becomes too powerful. We have to crush it."

- Winston Churchill (November 1936 speaking to US - General Robert E. Wood)

"This war is an English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany."

- Winston Churchill (- Autumn 1939 broadcast)

Click on the image above to view a larger version in a new window


As had been the case in World War One, Great Britain and other nations threatened by Germany's economic power looked
for an excuse to go to war, and as public anger in Germany grew over the boycott, Hitler foolishly gave them that excuse.
Years later, in a spirit of candor, the real reasons for that war were made clear.

"The war wasn't only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended
so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn't want to."

- Winston Churchill to Truman (Fultun, USA March 1946)

"Germany's unforgivable crime before WW2 was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system
and to build up an independent exchange system from which the world-finance couldn't profit anymore. ...We
butchered the wrong pig."

-Winston Churchill (The Second World War - Bern, 1960)

As a side note, we need to step back before WW2 and recall Marine Major General Smedley Butler. In 1933, Wall Street
bankers and financiers had bankrolled the successful coups by both Hitler and Mussolini. Brown Brothers Harriman in New
York was financing Hitler right up to the day war was declared with Germany.

And they decided that a fascist dictatorship in the United


States based on the one on Italy would be far better for their
business interests than Roosevelt's "New Deal" which
threatened massive wealth re-distribution to recapitalize the
working and middle class of America.

So the Wall Street tycoons recruited General Butler to lead


the overthrow of the US Government and install a
"Secretary of General Affairs" who would be answerable to
Wall Street and not the people, would crush social unrest
and shut down all labor unions.

General Butler pretended to go along with the scheme but


then exposed the plot to Congress. Congress, then as now
in the pocket of the Wall Street bankers, refused to act.

When Roosevelt learned of the planned coup he demanded


the arrest of the plotters, but the plotters simply reminded
Roosevelt that if any one of them were sent to prison, their
friends on Wall Street would deliberately collapse the still-
fragile economy and blame him for it.

Roosevelt was thus unable to act until the start of WW2, at


which time he prosecuted many of the plotters under the
Trading With The Enemy act.
Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler

The Congressional minutes into the coup were finally declassified in 1967, but rumors of the attempted coup became the
inspiration for the movie, "Seven Days in May" but with the true financial villains erased from the script.

"I spent 33 years and four months in active military service as a member of our country's most agile military force -
the Marine Corps.

I served in all commissioned ranks from second lieutenant to Major General. And during that period I spent more of
my time being a high - class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers.
In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. "I suspected I was just a part of a racket at the time.

Now I am sure of it.

Like all members of the military profession I never had an original thought until I left the service. My mental
faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of the higher-ups. This is typical with
everyone in the military service.

Thus I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti
and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in.

I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record of
racketeering is long.

I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-12. I brought light to the
Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916.

In China in 1927 I helped see to it that the Standard Oil went its way unmolested. During those years, I had, as the
boys in the back room would say, a swell racket.

I was rewarded with honors, medals and promotion. Looking back on it, I feel I might have given Al Capone a few
hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three city districts. I operated on three continents."

- General Smedley Butler, former US Marine Corps Commandant,1935

President John F. Kennedy

As President, John F. Kennedy understood the predatory nature of private central banking. He understood why Andrew fought
so hard to end the Second Bank of the United States. So Kennedy wrote and signed Executive Order 11110 which ordered
the US Treasury to issue a new public currency, the United States Note.
Presidents Kennedy and Soekarno

Kennedy was working with President Soekarno of Indonesia who was at that time the signatory for the Global Collateral
Accounts which were intended to be used for humanitarian purposes but which were subverted at the time of the Bretton-
Woods agreement at the end of WWII.

The intention of Kennedy and Soekarno was to end the reign of the globalist privately owned central banking system
- which is the main reason that Kennedy was killed, and for his part Soekarno remained under house arrest for the
rest of his life.

The efforts to regain control of the Global Collateral Accounts are now being led by Neil Keenan.

The West had been stealing from the Collateral Accounts for nearly 100 years but this has now been stopped by Neil Keenan
and his associates, who have gone to considerable expense and risk in their mission to ensure the Global Collateral Accounts
are accessible - for the humanitarian purposes for which they were established.
Kennedy's United States Note - with the lack of reference to the FEDERAL RESERVE

Kennedy's United States Notes were not borrowed from the Federal Reserve but created by the US Government and backed
by the silver stockpiles held by the US Government. It represented a return to the system of economics the United States had
been founded on, and was perfectly legal for Kennedy to do.

All told, some four and one half billion dollars went into public circulation, eroding interest payments to the Federal Reserve
and loosening their control over the nation. Five months later John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas Texas, and
the United States Notes pulled from circulation and destroyed (except for samples held by collectors).

John J. McCloy
John J. McCloy, President of the Chase Manhattan Bank, and President of the World Bank, was named to the Warren
Commission, presumably to make certain the banking dimensions behind the assassination were concealed from the public.

As we enter the eleventh year of what future history will most certainly describe as World War Three, we need to examine the
financial dimensions behind the wars.

Towards the end of World War Two, when it became obvious that the allies were going to win and dictate the post war
environment, the major world economic powers met at Bretton Woods, a luxury resort in New Hampshire in July of 1944, and
hammered out the Bretton Woods agreement for international finance.

The British Pound lost its position as the global trade and reserve currency to the US dollar (part of the price demanded by
Roosevelt in exchange for the US entry into the war). Absent the economic advantages of being the world's "go-to" currency,
Britain was forced to nationalize the Bank of England in 1946.

The Bretton Woods agreement, ratified in 1945, in addition to making the dollar the global reserve and trade currency,
obligated the signatory nations to tie their currencies to the dollar. The nations that ratified Bretton Woods did so on two
conditions. The first was that the Federal Reserve would refrain from over-printing the dollar as a means to loot real products
and produce from other nations in exchange for ink and paper; basically an imperial tax.

That assurance was backed up by the second requirement, which was that the US dollar would always be convertible to gold
at $35 per ounce.

The Bretton Woods resort, New Hampshire

The Federal Reserve, being a private bank and not answerable to the US Government, did start overprinting paper dollars,
and much of the perceived prosperity of the 1950s and 1960s was the result of foreign nations' obligations to accept the paper
notes as being worth gold at the rate of $35 an ounce.

Then in 1970, France looked at the huge pile of paper notes sitting in their vaults, for which real French products like wine and
cheese had been traded, and notified the United States government that they would exercise their option under Bretton
Woods to return the paper notes for gold at the $35 per ounce exchange rate.

The United States had nowhere near the gold to redeem the paper notes, so on August 15th, 1971, Richard Nixon
"temporarily" suspended the gold convertibility of the US Federal Reserve Notes.
Nixon announced the end of gold convertability

Later termed the "Nixon shock", this move effectively ended Bretton Woods and many global currencies started to delink from
the US dollar.
The "Nixon Shock"

Worse, since the United States had collateralized their loans with the nation's gold reserves, it quickly became apparent that
the US Government did not in fact have enough gold to cover the outstanding debts.

Foreign nations began to get very nervous about their loans to the US and understandably were reluctant to loan any
additional money to the United States without some form of collateral.

So Richard Nixon started the environmental movement, with the EPA and its various programs such as "wilderness zones",
Roadless areas", Heritage rivers", "Wetlands", all of which took vast areas of public lands and made them off limits to the
American people who were technically the owners of those lands.

But Nixon had little concern for the environment and the real purpose of this land grab under the guise of the environment was
to pledge those pristine lands and their vast mineral resources as collateral on the national debt. This was part of the
forerunner to the UN Agernda 21 "Sustainability" farce.

The plethora of different programs was simply to conceal the true scale of how much American land was being pledged to
foreign lenders as collateral on the government's debts; eventually almost 25% of the nation itself.

All of this is illegal as the Enclave Clause of the Constitution limits the Federal Government to owning the land under Federal
Government buildings and military bases, and that Enclave Clause was written into the Constitution by the Founding Fathers
to specifically to prevent the Federal Government simply seizing the land belonging to the people to sell off, pledge as
collateral, or rent!
With open lands for collateral already in short supply, the US Government embarked on a new program to shore up sagging
international demand for the dollar.

The United States approached the world's oil producing nations, mostly in the Middle East, and offered them a deal. In
exchange for only selling their oil for dollars, the United States would guarantee the military safety of those oil-rich nations.

The oil rich nations would agree to spend and invest their US paper dollars inside the United States, in particular in US
Treasury Bonds, redeemable through future generations of US taxpayers.

The concept was labeled the "petrodollar". In effect, the US, no longer able to back the dollar with gold, was now
backing it with oil.

Other peoples' oil. And that necessity to keep control over those oil nations to prop up the dollar has shaped America's foreign
policy in the region ever since.

But as America's manufacturing and agriculture has declined, the oil producing nations faced a dilemma. Those piles of US
Federal Reserve notes were not able to purchase much from the United States because the United States had little (other
than real estate) anyone wanted to buy.

Europe's cars and aircraft were superior and less costly, while experiments with GMO food crops led to nations refusing to buy
US food exports.

Israel's constant belligerence against its neighbors caused them to wonder if the US could actually keep their end of the
petrodollar arrangement. Oil producing nations started to talk of selling their oil for whatever currency the purchasers chose to
use.
Saddam Hussein

Iraq, already hostile to the United States following Desert Storm, demanded the right to sell their oil for Euros in 2000 and in
2002, the United Nations agreed to allow it under the "Oil for food" program instituted following Desert Storm.

One year later the United States re-invaded Iraq under the lie of Saddam's nuclear weapons, lynched Saddam Hussein,
and placed Iraq's oil back on the world market only for US dollars.

The clear US policy shift following 9-11, away from being an impartial broker of peace in the Mideast to one of unquestioned
support for Israel's aggressions only further eroded confidence in the Petrodollar deal and even more oil producing nations
started openly talking of oil trade for other global currencies.

Gaddafi

Over in Libya, Muammar Gaddafi had instituted a state-owned central bank and a value based trade currency, the Gold Dinar.
Also see: Libya: From Africas Richest State Under Gaddafi, to Failed State After NATO Intervention

Gaddafi announced that Libya's oil was for sale, but only for the Gold Dinar. Other African nations, seeing the rise of the Gold
Dinar and the Euro, even as the US dollar continued its inflation-driven decline, flocked to the new Libyan currency for trade.

This move had the potential to seriously undermine the global hegemony of the dollar. French President Nicolas
Sarkozy reportedly went so far as to call Libya a threat to the financial security of the world.

So, the United States invaded Libya, brutally murdered Qaddafi (the object lesson of Saddam's lynching not being enough of
a message, apparently), imposed a private central bank, and returned Libya's oil output to dollars only. The gold that was to
have been made into the Gold Dinars is, as of last report, unaccounted for.
General Wesley Clark blew the whistle on US plans to conquer the oil-rich Middle East, to attack and take over 7 countries in 5 years.

According to General Wesley Clark, the master plan for the "dollarification" of the world's oil nations included seven targets,
Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran (Venezuela, which dared to sell their oil to China for the Yuan, is a late
addition).

What is notable about the original seven nations originally targeted by the US is that none of them are members of the Bank
for International Settlements, the private central bankers private central bank, located in Switzerland.

This meant that these nations were deciding for themselves how to run their nations' economies, rather than submit
to the international private banks.

Now the bankers' gun sights are on Iran, which dares to have a government central bank and sell their oil for whatever
currency they choose.

The war agenda is, as always, to force Iran's oil to be sold only for dollars and to force them to accept a privately
owned central bank.

Malaysia, one of the few remaining nations without a Rothschild central bank, is now being invaded by a force
claimed to be "Al Qaeda" and has suffered numerous suspicious losses of its commercial passenger jets.

With the death of President Hugo Chavez, plans to impose a US and banker friendly regime on Venezuela are clearly being
implemented.
Germany's gold bullion. Where is it?

The German government recently asked for the return of some of their gold bullion from the Bank of France and the New York
Federal Reserve. France has said it will take 5 years to return Germany's gold. The United States has said they will need 8
years to return Germany's gold.

This suggests strongly that the Bank of France and the NY Federal Reserve have used the deposited gold for other
purposes, most likely to cover gold futures contracts used to artificially suppress the price of gold to keep investors in the
equities markets, and the Central Banks are scrambling to find new gold to cover the shortfall and prevent a gold run.

So it is inevitable that suddenly France invades Mali, ostensibly to combat Al Qaeda, with the US joining in. Mali just
happens to be one of the world's largest gold producers with gold accounting for 80% of Mali exports. War for the
bankers does not get more obvious than that!

Mexico has demanded a physical audit of their gold bullion stored at the Bank of England, and along with Venezuela's vast oil
reserves (larger than Saudi Arabia), Venezuela's gold mines are a prize lusted after by all the Central Banks that played fast
and loose with other peoples' gold bullion.

So we can expect regime change if not outright invasion soon.

You have been raised by a public school system and media that constantly assures you that the reasons for all these wars
and assassinations are many and varied.

The US claims to bring democracy to the conquered lands (they haven't; the usual result of a US overthrow is the imposition
of a dictatorship, such as the 1953 CIA overthrow of Iran's democratically elected government of Mohammad Mosaddegh and
the imposition of the Shah, or the 1973 CIA overthrow of Chile's democratically elected government of President Salvador
Allende, and the imposition of Augusto Pinochet), or to save a people from a cruel oppressor, revenge for 9-11, or that tired
worn-out catch all excuse for invasion, weapons of mass destruction. Assassinations are always passed off as "crazed lone
nuts" to obscure the real agenda.

The real agenda is simple. It is enslavement of the people by creation of a false sense of obligation.

That obligation is false because the Private Central Banking system, by design, always creates more debt than money with
which to pay that debt.

Private Central Banking is not science, it is a religion; a set of arbitrary rules created to benefit the priesthood, meaning
the owners of the Private Central Bank.

The fraud persists, with often lethal results, because the people are tricked into believing that this is the way life is suppoed to
be and no alternative exists or should be dreamt of.

The same was true of two earlier systems of enslavement, Rule by Divine Right and Slavery, both systems built to trick people
into obedience, and both now recognized by modern civilizatyion as illegitimate.

Now we are entering a time in human history where we will recognize that rule by debt, or rule by Private Central Bankers
issuing the public currency as a loan at interest, is equally illegitimate.

It only works as long as people allow themselves to believe that this is the way life is supposed to be.

But understand this above all; Private Central Banks do not exist to serve the people, the community, or the nation. Private
Central Banks exist to serve their owners, to make them rich beyond the dreams of Midas and all for the cost of ink, paper,
and the right bribe to the right official.

Behind all these wars, all these assassinations, the hundred million horrible deaths from all the wars lies a single policy of
dictatorship. The private central bankers allow rulers to rule only on the condition that the people of a nation be enslaved to
the private central banks.

Failing that, said ruler will be killed, and their nation invaded by those other nations enslaved to private central banks.

The so-called "clash of civilizations" we read about on the corporate media is really a war between banking systems, with the
private central bankers forcing themselves onto the rest of the world, no matter how many millions must die for it.

Indeed the constant hatemongering against Muslims lies in a simple fact. Like the ancient Christians (prior to the Knights
Templars private banking system) , Muslims forbid usury, or the lending of money at interest. And that is the reason our
government and media insist they must be killed or converted. They refuse to submit to currencies issued at interest. They
refuse to be debt slaves.

So off to war your children must go, to spill their blood for the money-junkies' gold. We barely survived the last two world wars.
In the nuclear/bioweapon age, are the private central bankers willing to risk incinerating the whole planet just to feed their
greed?

Apparently so. This brings us to the current situation in the Ukraine, Russia, and China.

The European Union had been courting the government of the Ukraine to merge with the EU, and more to the point, entangle
their economy with the private-owned European Central Bank.
The government of the Ukraine was considering the move, but had made no commitments. Part of their concern lay with the
conditions in other EU nations enslaved to the ECB, notably Cyprus, Greece, Spain, and Italy. So they were properly
cautious.

Then Russia stepped in with a better deal and the Ukraine, exercising the basic choice all consumers have to choose the best
product at the best price, dropped the EU and announced they were going to go with Russia's offer.

It was at that point that agents provocateurs flooded into the Ukraine, covertly funded by intelligence agency fronts like
CANVAS and USAID, stirring up trouble, while the western media proclaimed this was a popular revolution. Snipers shot at
people and this violence was blamed on then-President Yanukovich.

However a leaked recording of a phone call between the EU's Catherine Ashton and Estonia's Foreign Minister Urmas Paet
confirmed the snipers were working for the overthrow plotters, not the Ukrainian government. Urmas Paet has confirmed the
authenticity of that phone call.

This is a classic pattern of covert overthrow we have seen many times before.

Since the end of WW2, the US has covertly tried to overthrow the governments of 56 nations, succeeding 25 times.

Examples include the 1953 overthrow of Iran's elected government of Mohammed Mossadegh and the imposition of the Shah,
the 1973 overthrow of Chile's elected government of Salvador Allende and the imposition of the Pinochet dictatorship, and of
course, the current overthrow of Ukraine's elected government of Yanukovich and the imposition of the current unelected
government, which is already gutting the Ukraine's wealth to hand to the western bankers.

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa have formed a parallel financial system called BRICS, officially launched on
January 1, 2015. As of this writing some 80 nations are ready to trade with BRICS in transactions that do not involve
the US dollar.
Despite US economic warfare against both Russia and China, the Ruble and Yuan are seen as more attractive for
international trade and banking than the US dollar, hence the US attempt to fan the Ukraine crisis into war with Russia, and
attempts to provoke North Korea as a back door to war with China.

The US Corporate Government: "These are the enemies of everything we hold dear in America: Your
children must kill them for us..."

Flag waving and propaganda aside, all modern wars are wars by and for the private bankers, fought and bled for by
third parties unaware of the true reason they are expected to gracefully be killed and croppled for.

The process is quite simple. As soon as the Private Central Bank issues its currency as a loan at interest, the public is forced
deeper and deeper into debt.

When the people are reluctant to borrow any more, that is when the Keynesian economists demand the government borrow
more to keep the pyramid scheme working.

When both the people and government refuse to borrow any more, that is when wars are started, to plunge everyone even
deeper into debt to pay for the war, then after the war to borrow more to rebuild.

When the war is over, the people have about the same as they did before the war, except the graveyards are far larger and
everyone is in debt to the private bankers for the next century. This is why Brown Brothers Harriman in New York was funding
the rise of Adolf Hitler.

As long as Private Central Banks are allowed to exist, inevitably as the night follows day there will be poverty,
hopelessness, and millions of deaths in endless World Wars, until the Earth itself is sacrificed in flames to Mammon.
The path to true peace on Earth lies in the abolishment of all private central banking everywhere, and a return to the
state-issued value-based currencies that allow nations and people to become prosperous.

"Banks do not have an obligation to promote the public good."

- Alexander Dielius, CEO, Germany, Austrian, Eastern Europe Goldman Sachs, 2010

"I am just a banker doing God's work."

- Lloyd Blankfein, CEO, Goldman Sachs, 2009

From the film "The International" which tells the story of the take-down of the corrupt Bank of Credit and Commerce International which was the 7th
largest private bank in the world.

'The question the people of the world should be asking is not whether to raise debt
ceilings, but rather why our governments, which are authorised to create and issue
interest-free money, instead borrow that money at interest from a privately-owned central
banking system, thereby plunging future generations into debt slavery to that bank?'

Three steps from Private Central Bank to World War:


Step 1: Enslave the nation to a private Central Bank issuing the public currency as a loan at interest to trap the
people in unpayable debt

Step 2: When the people cannot borrow any more, have the government borrow on their behalf (and without their
permissiono) to keep the pyramid scheme working

Step 3: When both the people and the government can no longer borrow, start a world war to conquer other
nations wealth to "balance the books"

An Revealing Look at the Interests of the United Nations bodies of NATO and the WTO:
Click the image above to open a larger version in a new browser window

9/11 Cover-Up Imploding As Mainstream Media Forced To Report Saudi Link


April 23 2016 | From: Infowars / FreeThoughtProject / Various

Establishment media finally coming clean about attack: New evidence reveals a link between Saudi
Arabia and 9/11, according to an international newspaper.
Ghassan Al-Sharbi, a Saudi bombmaker, is said to have taken flying lessons with the 9/11 hijackers and U.S.
investigators found his flight certificate in an envelope from the Saudi embassy in Washington, D.C., the
Australianreported, citing a recently declassified U.S. memo.

Related: Its Time to Admit: The 9/11 Truthers Were Right

The envelope points to the fundamental question hanging over us today: to what extent was the 9/11 plot
facilitated by individuals at the highest levels of the Saudi government? Asked Brian McGlinchey, the activist who
uncovered the 2003 memo known as Document 17.

Al-Sharbi was captured in Pakistan in 2002 and has since been held in Guantanamo Bay, which may indicate why President
Obama has kept the detention center open despite promising he would close it immediately during his 2008 presidential
campaign.

And Document 17 may explain why Saudi Arabia is freaking out right now, including the recent threat to dump nearly $750
billion in U.S. Treasury bonds and other assets if Congress passes a popular bill that would allow 9/11 victims to sue the
country.

And it may also explain why both House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell are trying to
derail the bill, but they face a losing battle in the long-run: other mainstream outlets are finally coming clean about the Saudi
connection to 9/11.

The kingdoms involvement was deliberately covered up at the highest levels of our government, and the coverup
goes beyond locking up 28 pages of the Saudi report in a vault in the US Capitol basement, Paul Sperry of the
N.Y. Post reported. Investigations were throttled, co-conspirators were let off the hook.

Case agents Ive interviewed at the Joint Terrorism Task Forces in Washington and San Diego, the forward
operating base for some of the Saudi hijackers, as well as detectives at the Fairfax County (Va.) Police
Department who also investigated several 9/11 leads, say virtually every road led back to the Saudi Embassy in
Washington, as well as the Saudi Consulate in Los Angeles.

After 60-Minutes Bombshell, White House Says Secret 9/11 Docs Could Be Declassified In 60 Days

Related: Censored 28 Pages of 911 Half Truths Plaguing Mainstream Media

On a recent episode of 60-Minutes, former Florida governor, Democratic U.S. Senator and onetime chairman of the Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence, Bob Graham implicated a US ally for their role in the September 11th attacks.

I think its implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didnt speak English, most of whom had never
been in the United States before, many didnt have a high school education, could have carried out such a
complicated task without some support from within the United States, says Graham in the interview, implicating
Saudi Arabia for thier role in 9/11."

CBS reported that Graham and his Joint Inquiry co-chair in the House, former Representative Porter Goss (R-FL) - who
went on to be director of the CIA - say the 28 pages were excised from their report by the Bush Administration in the interest
of national security.

Graham wouldnt discuss the classified contents, but says the 28 pages outline a network of people he believes supported
hijackers in the U.S. He tells Steve Kroft he believes the hijackers were substantially supported by Saudi Arabia. Asked if
the support was from government, rich people or charities, the former senator replies, all of the above.

Until now, anyone who questioned the highly suspect official narrative on the 9/11 attacks has been labeled a conspiracy
theorist or a kook. But when current and former members of Congress, U.S. officials, and the 9/11 Commissioners
themselves call for the release of these 28-pages, which tells a different story of what happened that fateful day - people will
listen - and listen, they did.

On Tuesday, after Grahams appearance on 60-Minutes, he says he received a phone call - from the White House.

The Tampa Bay Times then spoke with Graham about that call.

Graham told the Tampa Bay Times that Brett Holmgren, a senior policy adviser to the assistant to the president
for Homeland Security, told him the declassification review of the documents withheld from a report issued by a
Joint Congressional Commission in 2003 will soon be completed.

Graham, who asked the president to declassify the records more than two years ago, said he asked how soon he
could expect a decision and was told one or two months.

Graham was co-chairman of a joint congressional committee that investigated the attacks.

The 28 pages were classified at the request of the FBI. Graham has been pushing for release of the documents since 2011
when he learned that the FBI had failed to disclose part of its investigation that included reports that high-ranking Saudi
Arabian officials provided financial aid and other help to the 19 hijackers who flew airplanes into the World Trade Center and
the Pentagon.

He says the FBI initially denied there were such reports but has since turned over 80,000 pages in a federal lawsuit seeking
the release of all reports on the investigation.
The decision makers at the White House have realized the public cares about it and there is an urgency to come to
a decision, Graham said, noting that he appearance on 60-minutes prompted the White House to finally address
the issue.

For over a decade, the families of the victims have demanded the full story on what happened and have only been met with
ridicule and closed doors.

This information being aired on mainstream television followed by an official response and plan to declassify the
information is historical and heartening news to those seeking the truth. Now, we the people may finally receive more insight
into the murderous actions on that day, bringing us closer to the closure we so sincerely deserve.

9/11 Commission Members Call For Release Of 28 Pages

Related: The Smoking Gun: "Document 17" Links Saudi Embassy In Washington To Sept 11

Saudi Arabian connection soon to be brought to light: Two months ago when Donald Trump said the release of the
28 classified pages of the 9/11 report would show the involvement of the Saudi government, NATIONAL REVIEW
called him a 9/11 Truther and said Trump turned into an ALEX JONES SHOW caller.

Now CBS 60 Minutes, along with former Senator Bob Graham, Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
and former members of the 9/11 Commission like Sen Bob Kerrey and John Lehman, Reagans Secretary of the Navy ,have
joined Trump and Alex Jones Show callers in demanding the classified information be released.

Saudi Arabia is a Cancer on the World

Related: U.S. House of Representatives to introduce resolution to investigate Obama Administrations high crimes
and misdemeanors

Saudi Arabia is the worst country in the world, bar none. If it disappeared off the map tomorrow, the planet would hold the
biggest party youve ever seen.

So why does Obama bow to Saudi royals like hes their house bitch every time he visits?

Related: As Oil Prices Fall, Saudi Arabia Borrows $10 Billion to Stay Afloat

Henry Kissinger, War Criminal Extraordinaire: What You Need To Know About His Real
History - And Why The Sanders / Clinton Exchange Matters
April 22 2016 | From: Sott / Various

Sanders was right about Kissinger. His civilian death toll nears 4 million, his policies built today's
Middle East. Vote Hillary, get Henry. That seemed to be the message Hillary Clinton wants to send;
she's spoken highly of Kissinger in her last two debates with Bernie Sanders.
Sanders fired back at Clinton for seeking foreign-policy wisdom from the Vietnam-era secretary of state. "I find it
rather amazing," Sanders said, "given that I happen to believe that Kissinger was one of the most destructive
secretaries of state in the modern history of this country. I am proud to say that Henry Kissinger is not my friend. I
will not take advice from Henry Kissinger."

Maybe Kissinger will be the Dick Cheney of this campaign, angling for a shot at a dark-lord VP, you know, like Cheney
himself. I doubt it. Though, at 92 and still a congenital publicity seeker, he must be enjoying himself.
In my most recent book, Kissinger's Shadow, I tried to use Kissinger as a window onto both the collapse of the national
security state, brought about by Vietnam, its reconstruction on new footings reading to meet the challenges of 1970s and
beyond.

It is in that reconstruction, in which Kissinger was key, that one can find the beginning of the militarization of the Persian Gulf
- that is, the seeds sprouting the catastrophe we now find ourselves in.

As I wrote a few months ago for TomDispatch:

Similarly, each of Kissinger's Middle East initiatives has been disastrous in the long run.

Just think about them from the vantage point of 2015: banking on despots, inflating the Shah, providing massive
amounts of aid to security forces that tortured and terrorized democrats, pumping up the U.S. defense industry with
recycled petrodollars and so spurring a Middle East arms race financed by high gas prices, emboldening
Pakistan's intelligence service, nurturing Islamic fundamentalism, playing Iran and the Kurds off against Iraq, and
then Iraq and Iran off against the Kurds, and committing Washington to defending Israel's occupation of Arab
lands.

Combined, they've helped bind the modern Middle East into a knot that even Alexander's sword couldn't sever."

At the debate, Bernie went on the offensive. He not only called Kissinger one of the most destructive secretaries of state in
our modern history, he explained some of the history.

"In fact, Kissinger's actions in Cambodia, when the United States bombed that country, over - through Prince Sihanouk,
created the instability for Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge to come in who then butchered some 3 million innocent people - one
of the worst genocides in the history of the world."
I have no doubt that the fact-checkers are going to mangle Sanders' claims here, but he is pretty much right.

Kissinger didn't create the Khmer Rouge, but his mad and illegal bombing of Cambodia created the conditions
where the most genocidal, militant faction of a broad and diverse insurgency could seize control of first the
insurgency and then the state.

So for the sake of fact-checking Kissinger's genocide in Cambodia for millennial supporters of Sanders, who weren't yet alive
when Kissinger was acting with his full power, here's how I describe his responsibility in Kissinger's Shadow, with the help of
Ben Kiernan, a professor of history at Yale:

That Kissinger, along with Nixon, presided over the bombing of Cambodia, and had done so since March of 1969,
is now well known. Less so is that the worst of his bombing started in February 1973, a
month after Washington, Hanoi, and Saigon signed the Paris Peace accords.

In 1972, the U.S. dropped, in total, 53,000 tons of bombs on Cambodia. Between February 8 and August 15, 1973,
that number increased nearly five-fold and targeted not just enemy "sanctuaries" in the country's east but the
whole country.

In other words, Washington dropped the same amount of explosives on Cambodia in these six months as it
did in the entire previous four years. Think of it as an accelerando climax to Nixon and Kissinger's epic bombing
opera.

"We would rather err on the side of doing too much," Kissinger said to his envoy in Cambodia the day after the
escalation began, referring to the bombing, than too little. "I see no reason not to really whack the hell out of them
in Cambodia," Nixon said to Kissinger a few days later.

The nominal reason for this intensified bombing was the same as it ever was: to save face. Years of bombing had,
as discussed earlier, created an untenable situation in the country, leading to a 1970 coup that, in turn, broadened
the social base of the insurgency to include communists, "Sihanoukists" (supporters of deposed Prince Sihanouk
(whom Sanders mentioned in the debate) and other non-communists.

Nixon and Kissinger's solution to this crisis caused by bombing was more bombing, including phosphorous
explosives and cluster bombs that each released thousands of either ball bearings or darts.
The assault was meant to force the insurgency to the bargaining table, or force North Vietnam or China to force the
Cambodian insurgents to the table. And, as always, there were domestic calculations: bombing Cambodia might
distract from the Watergate scandal. It didn't.

The historian Ben Kiernan calls this intensified phase of the bombing a "watershed in Kampuchean history."
Kiernan is now a professor of history at Yale University and head of its Genocide Studies Program.

In the 1970s, he learned the Khmer language and interviewed hundreds of Cambodian refugees, including victims
and former members of the Khmer Rouge. Based on those interviews, as well as extensive documentary research,
including Air Force bombing data, he drew the following three conclusions:

First: The bombing caused "enormous losses" of Cambodian "life and property" on an almost unimaginable scale,
across the country. The campaign was indiscriminate, with rural civilians the primary victims. As many as three
million people were forced out of their homes during the war, almost half the country's population.

It's impossible to read the testimonies taken by Kiernan and others and not be stunned: twenty people killed in one
raid, thirty in another, entire families obliterated, hundreds of acres of crops scorched, whole villages destroyed.
"They hit houses in Samrong," one survivor recalls, "and thirty people were killed:"

Another said that the "bombing was massive and devastating, and they just kept bombing more and more
massively, so massively you couldn't believe it, so that it engulfed the forests, engulfed the forests with bombs,
with devastation."

Second: The bombing was an effective recruitment tool for the Khmer Rouge. Propaganda doesn't seem like quite
the right word, since it implies some form of deception or manipulation. Object lesson might be a better description
of the service Kissinger provided to Pol Pot. Here's a former Khmer Rouge cadre describing the effect of the
bombing:

"The ordinary people sometimes literally shit in their pants when the big bombs and shells came. Their minds just
froze up and they would wander around mute for three or four days.

Terrified and half crazy, the people were ready to believe what they were told. It was because of their
dissatisfaction with the bombing that they kept on co-operating with the Khmer Rouge, joining up with the Khmer
Rouge, sending their children off to go with them . . .

Sometimes the bombs fell and hit little children, and their fathers would be all for the Khmer Rouge."
Another told a journalist that his village, Pursat, had been destroyed by U.S. bombs, "killing 200 of its 350
inhabitants and propelling him into a career of violence and absolute loyalty" to the Khmer Rouge. One elderly
woman said she had never met a "Khmer Rouge" until her village was destroyed.

The propaganda was strategic but the fury and confusion real: "The people were very angry with the U.S., and that
is why so many of them joined the Khmer communists," reported one witness. Another said that after the bombs
destroyed a number of monasteries, "people in our village were furious with the Americans; they did not know why
the Americans had bombed them."

Third: The bombing that took place between February and August 1973 had two consequences: It delayed a
Communist victory while at the same time radically transformed the nature of that victory when it did come two
years later.

Had Lon Nol fallen in early or mid-1973, the insurgent victors would have been comprised of diverse factions,
including moderates and Sihanouk loyalists. By the time Lon Nol did fall in early 1975, not only had the Khmer
Rouge come to dominate the insurgency but a radical faction had come to dominate the Khmer Rouge.

Nixon and Kissinger's intensification of the bombing killed or scattered much of the anti- Lon Nol opposition, driving
the insurgency into siege mode and giving the upper hand to a hardened corps of extremists circling around Pol
Pot.

The bombing sanctioned their extremism: when political-education cadre pointed to charred corpses and limbless
children and said this was a "manifestation of simple American barbarism," who could disagree? And it made them
even more extreme: in the villages, "people were made angry by the bombing and went to join the revolution," and
so it followed that those who didn't join the revolution were "CIA agents" and targeted for reprisal.

The destruction of the countryside also brought out a "revival of national chauvinism," which included anger toward
the Vietnamese for abandoning the struggle even as Cambodia was being devastated. Sihanouk supporters,
Vietnamese, and other moderates were purged from opposition forces.
At the same time, the strain of living under constant bombardment forced those areas under Khmer Rouge rule
into an accelerated program of peasant collectivization, justified by the demands of having to survive during
wartime. Emerging from the carnage was fury directed not just at United States imperialism but at the capital
"Phnom Penh," the city as a symbol of decadent, urban and industrial modernity.

On April 17th, 1975, the Khmer Rouge took Phnom Penh, and Pol Pot declared "Year Zero." His cadre
immediately began to empty out the capital and other cities, deporting millions of urban dwellers to the country's
northwest.

Cambodia's new rulers targeted for persecution Buddhist monks, ethnic minorities, former government loyalists,
intellectuals, moderate Communists, and anyone who would stand in the way of establishing their agrarian utopia.
Nearly the entire population of Cambodia was forced into rural labor camps.

By the time a now unified Vietnam invaded the country in 1979, overthrew the Khmer Rouge, and put an
end to the madness, as many as two million people, perhaps more, had been killed - of starvation,
exhaustion, disease, or murdered.

And of course, not just Cambodia. I was queried about how I came up - in a Nation piece last week - with these numbers:

"A full tally hasn't been done, but a back-of-the-envelope count would attribute 3 million, maybe 4 million deaths to
Kissinger's actions," in my post on Hillary Clinton's pride in being tutored by Henry Kissinger. More sources can be found
in Kissinger's Shadow, but here it goes:

Kissinger's hardline in southern Africa - in response to movements of national liberation in Angola and Mozambique and anti-
white supremacy struggles in Rhodesia and South Africa - led him to support allied insurgencies.

We might wish," Ford's secretary of defense James Schlesinger said during one 1975 strategy session, "to encourage the
disintegration of Angola."

And that's what Kissinger did. In July, he stepped up covert aid to UNITA, a pro-American, anti-MPLA insurgency in Angola
that he had already been running.
Likewise in Mozambique. All told, historians guess that these wars killed between 1,750,000 and 2 million people. Neither
country "disintegrated." But they were devastated, their infrastructure ruined, their governments militarized and bankrupted,
their hospitals and morgues filled beyond capacity. Mozambique's civil war ended in 1992, while fighting in Angola dragged
on for yet another decade.

Related: The Hidden History Of The Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia [Illuminati Cabal Zionists...]

Pakistan's genocide in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), which Kissinger green-lighted: Between 300,000 and a million.

The U.S.'s illegal bombing campaign in Cambodia: 100,000 civilians dead in the bombing. 1,671,000 killed in the resultant
genocide.

Indonesia's invasion and occupation of East Timor, which Kissinger greenlighted: 200,000 dead

Chile: at least 3,000

The Guatemalan genocide is an atrocity often not associated with Henry Kissinger, since the worst of its slaughter came in
1978-1983, a few years after he left office. But here, too, his fingerprints show.
In 1970, Kissinger and his military aide Alexander Haig were involved in passing the names and addresses of
"Guatemalan terrorists" to security forces, even though Washington was well aware that that the government was
using its U.S.-funded counter-terror program to eliminate not just armed insurgents but all political opposition and
that the great majority of political prisoners taken were summarily executed.

Shortly thereafter, repression in Guatemala got so out of hand that a member of Kissinger's NSC staff urged that the so-
called "40 Committee" - the committee chaired by Kissinger that brought together various arms of the national security state,
which helped organize the campaign to overthrow Allende in Chile - reconsider U.S. support for the Guatemalan
government.

Kissinger, as chair, didn't think it was an issue worth taking up and robust military support continued, paving the way for the
killing of over 100,000 people.
Senior war criminal Henry Kissinger and war criminal apprentice Hillary Rodham Clinton interviewed by media shill Charlie Rose

So, to sum up, using the lower estimates above: Kissinger's policies resulted in at least 4,124,000 civilian deaths,
probably many times that number of wounded and refugees - and that doesn't include Kissinger's victims in
Vietnam - a war that he (and Nixon) helped prolong for five years when they sabotaged 1968 peace talks - Laos, or
Argentina, Uruguay, the Middle East and Persian Gulf, at the hands of Kissinger's partners, such as the Shah and
the Saudis.
"Should Hillary Clinton be basking in Henry Kissinger's
praise," Michael Tracey, at the New Republic asked
Clinton's team.

This was after the candidate, at the previous debate,


seemed to think that Kissinger's approval was evidence of
her "progressivism." Joel Benenson, a Clinton "surrogate,"
said: "People generally believe that Henry Kissinger was a
good secretary of state . . . I think he's respected."

Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta, said: "Here's a


guy who's certainly knowledgeable about what it takes to
manage the State Department."

Considering the carnage Secretary of State Clinton left in


her wake in Libya, Mali and Honduras (and, as a senator, in
Iraq), there's much truth in that statement.

Greg Grandin is a professor of history at New York


University and the author of Kissinger's Shadow: The Long
Reach of America's Most Controversial Statesman. He is
the author of a number of prize-winning books,
including The Empire of Necessity: Slavery, Freedom, and
Deception in the New World, which won the Bancroft Prize
in American History.

He is also the author of Fordlandia: The Rise and Fall of


Henry Ford's Forgotten Jungle City (Metropolitan 2009), a
finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in History, as well as for the
National Book Award and the National Book Critics Circle
Award.

Henry Kissinger's Legacy of War Crimes Exposed by Secret Yale Visit

Abby Martin speaks about how Yale University's secret invite to Henry Kissinger has shined a new light into the former
Secretary of State's long list of criminality, by helping facilitate US war crimes in South East Asia, South America and the
Middle East, which resulted in the deaths of millions of civilians.

Of course there is also those famous Kissinger quotes:

"Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."

and

"Control oil, and you control nations; control food and you control the people."
Further reading (if you can stomach it):

The Grievous Return of Henry Kissinger

Released transcript of phone conversation between Nixon and Kissinger reveals U.S. intervention in Chile to block Allende
began long before September 1970 election

'The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer': 'Kissinger Cables' among latest and biggest
WikiLeaks documents release to date

Debacle, Inc.: How Henry Kissinger helped disorder the world

Intelligence officers confirm Kissinger role in Turkish invasion of Cyprus and Chilean coup

Psychopathic birds of a feather flock together: Hillary Clinton and Henry Kissinger

Dirty Game - Imported Mercenaries


March 27 2016 | From: Sott
This is a great resource, providing insight not only into how Syrians see the conflict in which they
find themselves, but also into the true nature of Daesh. Aside from the obvious American/Israeli
support, these two quotes from the production sum it all up:

"No human being can do such horrible things. No one with human nature commits such savage crimes." - Ashwaq
Abbas, Political Sciences Lecturer, Damascus University

And the ones that do have a name: psychopaths.

"These groups commit crimes only against Muslims. Show us what positive measures these groups have taken so
far. Have they gone to Palestine?"

- Nabil al-Halbavi, Syrian member of AhlulBayt World Assembly

The fact is, the people most in danger from so-called Islamic terror are Muslims. Daesh has killed far more Muslims in Iraq
and Syria than any other group.

Think about that the next time you see someone even slightly "Arab-looking" and feel a bit nervous. And if they're Syrian, not
only have they had to deal with barbaric groups like Daesh back at home; they also have to deal with the barbaric bigotry of
Westerners who are convinced every Muslim is a potential terrorist.

Statistically speaking, it's an utterly absurd notion.


George Soros: A Psychopaths Psychopath
March 25 2016 | From: MacedoniaOnline

According to Soros, Russias strategy is to avoid collapse by making the EU implode first by
exacerbating the migration crisis and stoking Islamophobia.

On February 11, the Guardian ran an article by George Soros which had run a day earlier here entitled Putin is a
bigger threat to Europes existence than Isis.

Related: Ferrari Jumps After Soros Emerges Among Top 10 Shareholders

After a quick check of my vital signs, I confirmed that I was indeed awake and the article was real and in the Guardian not
The Onion. Before I look at the tissue of untruths which make up the substance of Soros article, a few general words about
psychopaths are in order.

I have met a few psychopaths in my life a pernicious but small-time example is a real-estate salesman in Spain who cost
my family a great deal of time and money. The real problem with psychopaths big-time and small-time is not primarily
that they do bad things, but that we non-psychopaths are ill-prepared to deal with the fundamental difference between us
and them.
We people with operational consciences think (wrongly) that everyone is like us. We are shackled to the assumption that
just because we would not do unspeakably evil things or would be unable to live with ourselves if we did all other people
work the same way.

They do not.

When a psychopath lies, or steals, or manipulates or does whatever he thinks is required to get what he wants he has
no greater emotional connection with his actions than you or I have with yesterdays lunch.

We, the non-psychopaths, tell little lies and do little wrongs. But we have a limit beyond which we will not go. For the
psychopath, scale makes no difference. Stealing a familys savings, or crashing an economy, or destroying a country is of
no more consequence to the psychopath than deciding not to return ten bucks to a cashier who had made a mistake.
And no matter what evil the psychopath meticulously plotted and practiced against you, to him, what happens is your fault.
Always.

Which brings me back to George Soros.

Soros: Putin is no Ally in the Fight Against Islamic State

In the Guardians article, then, Soros claims the US and the EU are making a grievous error in thinking that President
Vladimir Putins Russia is a potential ally in the fight against Islamic State.

The assumptions here are based on pure falsehood. My colleague, the diligent and forthright journalist and writer Gearid
Colmin, laid an axe as sharp as any to the root of the notion that the so-called War on Terror (taken to include Islamic
State) serves anything other than the interests of what Colmin rightly calls a tiny and particularly tyrannical ruling elite.

In an interview with RT, Colmin said:

There is no War on Terror. There is a war which is being waged using terrorist proxy groups and they are
being used against nation states who are resisting US and Israeli hegemony.

And they are also being used as a means of disciplining the work forces in Europe. In a period of mass
unemployment and austerity, you now have terrorist attacks being committed by terrorists funded, armed
and trained by Western intelligence agencies. There is no such thing as ISIS.

ISIS is a creation of the United States.


Soros and his ilk created and benefit from what Soros calls Islamic State, yet his argument not only disregards that fact, it
kicks blame in the direction of the one major power Russia which has taken steps to deal with this US creation.

Soros goes on to make a number of other accusations against Russia, failing at any time to note that Russia alone has a
mandate from the legitimate government of Syria, or that Russia is seriously engaged in cleaning house in Syria, a job the
US was only simulating.

Acknowledgement of Russias successes in Syria comes from many quarters, including Seymour Hersh. Hersh is a high-
profile American journalist, but one incapable of understanding the reasons for US policy towards Syria, bless him.

Soros: Putin Working Towards Europes Demise

Soros next point is that Putins aim is to foster the EUs disintegration, and the best way to do so is to flood Europe with
Syrian refugees.

The truth is that Russias natural ally is Germany and preventing that alliance is the primary aim of the US government at
least according to Stratfor, a US intelligence agency.

Germanys efficiency and organizational abilities combined with Russias raw materials, inventive genius, and good relations
with China, is the combination those funding and directing ISIS least want to see. By occupying Germany with an army of
aggressive, unskilled, culturally insoluble economic migrants from Africa and elsewhere, the chess-players at the board of
realpolitik are attempting to head off that natural outcome.
Soros part in destabilizing Europe is well attested. The Daily Mail reported back in November 2015 that Soros was busy
telling the EU to take at least a million refugees every year.

In the same article, Hungarys Prime Minister Viktor Orban is quoted as saying, This invasion is driven, on the one hand, by
people smugglers, and on the other hand by those activists who support everything that weakens the nation-state. Orban
went on, This Western mindset and this activist network is perhaps best represented by George Soros.

Soros described in the article as a funder of pro-migration groups all over the world responded to Orbans comments
by arguing that his beliefs uphold European values.

I dont know what Soros means by European values, but I assume it includes lots more immigration for us unilaterally
decided upon by Mr. Soros.
As prime minister of Hungary, Orban is a man with, perhaps, better access than most to the truth about George Soros, a
Hungarian Jew who got his first business breaks collaborating with the Nazis in Hungary the source for which information
is his own fathers book Masquerade Dancing Around Death in Nazi-Occupied Hungary.

Thus, Soros has moved effortlessly from collaborating with the Nazis against his fellow Jews an occupation (if you will
excuse the pun) he makes little effort to hide to telling indigenous European peoples what the ethnic make-up of their
countries should be.

He was also instrumental in the destruction of Ukraine. As reported by New American, Soros has a giant footprint in
Ukraine. Similar to his operations in dozens of other nations, he has, over the past couple of decades, poured tens
of millions of dollars into Ukrainian non-governmental organizations (NGOs), ostensibly to assist them in transforming their
country into a more open and democratic society.

We have good reason to take George Soros seriously.

Soros: Anticipates Russias Collapse

Soros article downplays Putins strategic prowess before going on to anticipate regime change in Russia in 2017 as a result
of bankruptcy forced upon it by Western sanctions and crushed oil prices.

He then appears to credit Putin with masterminding a collapse in Europe and of anticipating benefits for Russia in the
aftermath. He notes, As Merkel correctly foresaw, the migration crisis has the potential to destroy it.
If you find yourself asking here: Why then did she create that crisis? that is because you are not a psychopath.

Soros article begins its descent with metaphysical and social observations, which from someone without billions of dollars
behind them would be seen as merely subjective musings, before landing squarely on the runway of identifying Putins
Russia as the real threat.

Textbook Psychopathy

This is not simply chutzpah. The traits Soros exhibits are those of textbook psychopathy: blaming others for his own actions
and attacking the victim is what the psychopath does.

Here, Soros disregards entirely his own extensive role in creating the problem he purports to seek to solve; meanwhile, he
accuses Russia, the only country to man-up to the war on Syria, of being behind the migration Soros has spent millions
engineering.
Soros is part of a cabal which plans the overthow of countries at dinner. Psychopathy is the baseline requirement for
membership.

So if you think conscience will make him and his friends stop at some point before you and your family reach conditions
materially identical to those experienced by the inhabitants of the Donbass region or if you think that Western Europe is
beyond the scope of their plans for engineered collapse just because you wouldnt do something like that you will find that
you are wrong.

When Europe is in tatters, and its men (whom Soros money helped turn in one lifetime from actual men into effeminized
liberal cultural lemmings) are squawking in disbelief as their pampered delusions are shattered in the collapse Soros
envisages, Soros will not care.
No matter that this is Europe and it is your life under attack this time, and not that of brown people or Eastern Europeans. It
wont make any difference.

For a psychopath its simple: you let him do it - its your fault.

Related: Exposed! Soros & Koch Bros Spend Millions Creating Chaos In US Streets

Brussels Attacks In Belgium: 322 Skull & Bones


March 24 2016 | From: BreakingViewsNZ / Various

Illuminati false flag exposed: Another example of the occult black magic at play.

Especially events like these.. All De-ZION-ed ahead of time; Perpetrated by the same Alphabet Soups who
perpetrate everything else! Problem-reaction-solution!

Related: The Order / Skull and Bones / Chapter 322

On the morning of Tuesday, March 22, 2016, two explosions occurred in the Brussels airport. Subsequently, another report
of an explosion soon followed at the Maalbeek metro station - succeeding the explosions at the airport.

Of course, this is all blamed on "suicide bombers." The airport and metro station have been shut down, and all flights to
Brussels have been cancelled, as the country is on temporary lockdown.
Now there are some very eerie and undeniable symbolisms and "coincidences" that aren't so coincidental after all:

The event took place on March 22, or "322";

"322" is often associated with the secret society "Skull and Bones"; the same organization corresponding with
911

The Georgia Guidestones were erected on March 22, 1980 - exactly 36 years ago on this day

Both this AND 911 occurred on Tuesday mornings

Exactly 758 weeks following the 911 attacks

Exactly 130 days following the Paris "attacks"- now there were said to be "130 deaths" in the Paris "attacks" - no
coincidence there!

2 days following the Spring Equinox / Hebrew New Year

5 days before Easter

1 day before the Full Moon

13th day on the Lunar Calendar

This event also just so happened to take place a day before the Doodle 4 Google propaganda. Was it a hoax? Probably.

Related: Russian PM calls Ukraine's security chief a "dimwit" over comments on Brussels blasts
Another move towards martial law

Just another random event? Or a perpetrated false-flag mental psy-op, staged, funded, and planned AHEAD of time?

Clinton Email Reveals: Google Sought Overthrow Of Syria's Assad + Robert Kennedy
Jr. Just Dropped A Truth Bomb: 'Pipeline War' Is At The Roots Of Syrian Crisis
March 23 2016 | From: WashingtonExaminer / Infowars

Google in 2012 sought to help insurgents overthrow Syrian President Bashar Assad, according to
State Department emails receiving fresh scrutiny this week.
Messages between former secretary of state Hillary Clinton's team and one of the company's executives detailed
the plan for Google to get involved in the region.

Related: Google Is Not What It Seems

A story largely ignored by the corporate media reveals the tech company Google offered to help Secretary of State
Clinton overthrow Bashar al-Assad by developing an app to track defections from the Syrian government.

Jared Cohen, the head of what was then the company's "Google Ideas" division, wrote in a July 2012 email to several top
Clinton officials.

Please keep close hold, but my team is planning to launch a tool... that will publicly track and map the defections
in Syria and which parts of the government they are coming from."

"Our logic behind this is that while many people are tracking the atrocities, nobody is visually representing and
mapping the defections, which we believe are important in encouraging more to defect and giving confidence to
the opposition," Cohen said, adding that the plan was for Google to surreptitiously give the tool to Middle Eastern
media.

"Given how hard it is to get information into Syria right now, we are partnering with Al-Jazeera who will take
primary ownership over the tool we have built, track the data, verify it, and broadcast it back into Syria," he said.
You can read the email for yourself here.

Related: WikiLeaks publishes searchable archive of Clinton emails

The message was addressed to deputy secretary of state Bill Burns; Alec Ross, a senior Clinton advisor; and Clinton's
deputy chief of staff, Jake Sullivan. Sullivan subsequently forwarded Cohen's proposal to Clinton, describing it as "a pretty
cool idea."

Cohen worked as a member of the secretary of state's policy planning staff from 2006 to 2010, when he was hired to lead
Google Ideas, but was tied to using social media to incite uprisings even before he left the department.

He once reportedly asked Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to hold off of conducting system maintenance that officials believed
could have impeded a brief 2009 uprising in Iran, and Julian Assange, who founded the secret-leaking website WikiLeaks,
has for years referred to Cohen as Google's "director of regime change."

In her book No Higher Honor Condoleezza Rice spoke fondly of Cohen, describing him as a young gun and said his work
in social media;
Would pay off handsomely when Twitter and Facebook became accelerants of democratic change in the Middle
East.

Social media played a predominant role in the so-called Arab Spring, the concerted effort by the State Department, the
Endowment for Democracy, USAID, the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute and Freedom
House to violently overthrow governments in the Middle East and North Africa.

In addition to Google, Facebook and Twitter were also involved in the effort to undermine governments in the region.

In total, according to a report in Indonesias Jakarta Post, 180,000 people died as a result of the US-orchestrated Arab
Spring, primarily in Libya, Syria and Yemen.

The exchange on Syria was highlighted by Wikileaks on Saturday. Earlier in the week, the site posted more than 30,000
emails that Clinton sent or received during her tenure leading the State Department.

Robert Kennedy Jr. Just Dropped A Truth Bomb: 'Pipeline War' Is At The Roots Of
Syrian Crisis
Related: Miserable failure: Western media are lying about Syria

The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The mind
simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that
human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.

Radio Sputnik discusses the origins of the Syrian crisis with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., attorney and nephew of US President
John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
Kennedy writes that the US decided to remove Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from power after he refused to back a
Qatari gas pipeline project. Sputnik also touched upon US foreign policy, the refugee crisis and why Donald Trump would be
a better president than Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.

Read more at: Sputnik

The Financial System Is A Larger Threat Than Terrorism


March 21 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

In the 21st century we have been distracted by the hyper-expensive war on terror. Trillions of
dollars have been added to the taxpayers burden and many billions of dollars in profits to the
military/security complex in order to combat insignificant foreign threats, such as the Taliban,
that remain undefeated after 15 years.

All this time the financial system, working hand-in-hand with policymakers, has done more damage to Americans
than terrorists could possibly inflict.

The purpose of the Federal Reserve and US Treasurys policy of zero interest rates is to support the prices of the over-
leveraged and fraudulent financial instruments that unregulated financial systems always create.

If inflation was properly measured, these zero rates would be negative rates, which means not only that retirees have no
income from their retirement savings but also that saving is a losing proposition. Instead of earning interest on your savings,
you pay interest that shrinks the real value of your saving.
Central banks, neoliberal economists, and the presstitute financial media advocate negative interest rates in order to force
people to spend instead of save. The notion is that the economys poor economic performance is not due to the failure of
economic policy but to people hoarding their money.

The Federal Reserve and its coterie of economists and presstitutes maintain the fiction of too much savings despite the
publication of the Federal Reserves own report that 52% of Americans cannot raise $400 without selling personal
possessions or borrowing the money.

Negative interest rates, which have been introduced in some countries such as Switzerland and threatened in other
countries, have caused people to avoid the tax on bank deposits by withdrawing their savings from banks in large
denomination bills. In Switzerland, for example, demand for the 1,000 franc bill (about $1,000) has increased sharply. These
large denomination bills now account for 60% of the Swiss currency in circulation.
The response of depositors to negative interest rates has resulted in neoliberal economists, such as Larry Summers, calling
for the elimination of large denomination bank notes in order to make it difficult for people to keep their cash balances
outside of banks.

Other neoliberal economists, such as Kenneth Rogoff want to eliminate cash altogether and have only electronic money.
Electronic money cannot be removed from bank deposits except by spending it. With electronic money as the only money,
financial institutions can use negative interest rates in order to steal the savings of their depositors.

People would attempt to resort to gold, silver, and forms of private money, but other methods of payment and saving would
be banned, and government would conduct sting operations in order to suppress evasions of electronic money with stiff
penalties.
What this picture shows is that government, economists, and presstitutes are allied against citizens achieving any financial
independence from personal saving.

Policymakers have a crackpot economic policy and those with control over your life value their scheme more than
they value your welfare.

This is the fate of people in the so-called democracies. Any remaining control that they have over their lives is being taken
away. Governments serve a few powerful interest groups whose agendas result in the destruction of the host economies.
The offshoring of middle class jobs transfers income and wealth from the middle class to the executives and owners of the
corporation, but it also kills the domestic consumer market for the offshored goods and services. As Michael Hudson writes,
it kills the host.

The financialization of the economy also kills the host and the owners of corporations as well. When corporate executives
borrow from banks in order to boost share prices and their performance bonuses by buying back the publicly held stock of
the corporations, future profits are converted into interest payments to banks.

The future income streams of the corporations are financialized. If the future income streams fail, the companies can be
foreclosed, like homeowners, and the banks become the owners of the corporations.
Between the offshoring of jobs and the conversion of more and more income streams into payments to banks, less and less
is available to be spent on goods and services. Thus, the economy fails to grow and falls into long-term decline. Today
many people can only pay the minimum payment on their credit card balance.

The result is massive growth in a balance that can never be paid off. It is these people who are the least able to service debt
who are hit with draconian charges. The way the credit card companies have it now, if you make one late payment or your
payment is returned by your bank, you are hit for the next six months with a Penalty Annual Percentage Rate of 29.49%.

In Europe entire countries are being foreclosed. Greece and Portugal have been forced into liquidation of national assets
and the social security systems. So many women have been forced into poverty and prostitution that the hourly price of a
prostitute has been driven down to $4.12.
Throughout the Western world the financial system has become an exploiter of the people and a deadweight loss on
economies. There are only two possible solutions. One is to break the large banks up into smaller and local entities such as
existed prior to the concentration that deregulation fostered.

The other is to nationalize them and operate them solely in the interest of the general welfare of the population.

The banks are too powerful currently for either solution to occur. But the greed, fraud, and self-serving behavior of Western
financial systems, aided and abeted by governments, could be leading to such a breakdown of economic life that the idea of
a private financial system will become as abhorent in the future as Nazism is today.

Oliver Stone Reveals Clandestine Meetings With Edward Snowden, NSA Worries
March 15 2016 | From: HollywoodReporter

We moved to Germany, because we did not feel comfortable in the U.S., the director says about
his upcoming movie about government whistle-blower Edward Snowden, played by Joseph
Gordon-Levitt.
Fears of interference by the National Security Agency led Oliver Stone to shoot Snowden, his upcoming movie
about government whistle-blower Edward Snowden, outside the United States.

"We moved to Germany, because we did not feel comfortable in the U.S., Stone said on March 6, speaking before
an audience at the Sun Valley Film Festival in Idaho, in a Q&A moderated by The Hollywood Reporters Stephen
Galloway.

"We felt like we were at risk here. We didnt know what the NSA might do, so we ended up in Munich, which was a
beautiful experience.

Even there, problems arose with companies that had connections to the U.S., he said: The American subsidiary says, You
cant get involved with this; we dont want our name on it. So BMW couldnt even help us in any way in Germany.

While in Sun Valley, the three-time Oscar winner held a private screening of Snowden for an invited audience of around two
dozen. Those who attended the screening, at the former home of Ernest Hemingway, included actress Melissa Leo, who
plays documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras.
Guests were required to sign non-disclosure agreements, but that did not prevent three of them from speaking to this
reporter. All praised the work-in-progress. What he did thats so brilliant is, he gave this kids whole back story, so you really
like him, said one audience member.

When Stone (whose films include Platoon, Born on the Fourth of July and Wall Street) was first approached to make the
movie, he hesitated. He had been working on another controversial subject, about the last few years in the life of Martin
Luther King Jr., and did not immediately wish to tackle something that incendiary again.

Glenn Greenwald [the journalist who worked with Poitras to break the Snowden story] asked me some advice and
I just wanted to stay away from controversy, he said.

I didnt want this. Be that as it may, a couple of months later, the Russian lawyer for Snowden contacts me via my
producer. The Russian lawyer told me to come to Russia and wanted me to meet him. One thing led to another,
and basically I got hooked.

In Moscow, Stone met multiple times with Snowden, who has been living in exile in Russia since evading the U.S.
governments attempts to arrest him for espionage.

Hes articulate, smart, very much the same, he said. Ive been seeing him off and on for a year - actually, more
than that. I saw him last week or two weeks ago to show him the final film.

He added: He is consistent: he believes so thoroughly in reform of the Internet that he has devoted himself to this
cause Because of the Russian hours, he stays up all night. Hes a night owl, and hes always in touch [with the
outside world], and hes working on some kind of constitution for the Internet with other people. So hes very busy.

And he stays in that 70-percent-computer world. Hes on another planet that way. His sense of humor has gotten
bigger, his tolerance. Hes not really in Russia in his mind - hes in some planetary position up there. And Lindsay
Mills, the woman hes loved for 10 years - really, its a serious affair - has moved there to be with him.

Spending time with Snowden, and researching what happened to him, Stone said, Its an amazing story. Heres a
young man, 30 years old at that time, and he does something thats so powerful. Who at 30 years old would do
that, sacrificing his life in that way? We met with him many times in Moscow, and we did a lot more research, and
we went ahead. He added, I think hes a historical figure of great consequence.

Despite the directors involvement in the movie, which stars Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Snowden and Shailene
Woodley as Mills, No studio would support it, he said.

It was extremely difficult to finance, extremely difficult to cast. We were doing another one of these numbers I had
done before, where preproduction is paid for by essentially the producer and myself, where youre living on a credit
card.

Eventually, financing came through from France and Germany. The contracts were signed, like eight days before
we started, he noted.

Its a very strange thing to do [a story about] an American man, and not be able to finance this movie in America.
And thats very disturbing, if you think about its implications on any subject that is not overtly pro-American.

They say we have freedom of expression; but thought is financed, and thought is controlled, and the
media is controlled. This country is very tight on that, and theres no criticism allowed at a certain level.
You can make movies about civil rights leaders who are dead, but its not easy to make one about a
current man.

Snowden opens in the U.S. on September 16.


Trump Vows: Elect Me And Youll Find Out Who Really Knocked Down The Twin
Towers
February 21 2016 | From: InfoWars

GOP frontrunner Donald Trump has promised to make public currently guarded secrets
surrounding the 9/11 attacks, should he be elected President.

Speaking at a campaign event in Bluffton, SC, Trump continued his onslaught on the Bush presidency by once
again raising the issue of the attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001.

Related: Trump Correct About Secret 9/11 Report

"We went after Iraq, they did not knock down the World Trade Center. Trump told those in attendance.

It wasnt the Iraqis that knocked down the World Trade Center, we went after Iraq, we decimated the country,
Irans taking over, okay. Trump continued.

But it wasnt the Iraqis, you will find out who really knocked down the World Trade Center. Because they have
papers in there that are very secret, you may find its the Saudis, okay? But you will find out.

But when I look at a guy like Lindsey Graham, youll end up being over in that war forever, youll start World War
Three. Trump also noted.

Trump was referring to the 28 pages of the original Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9/11, which remain classified and
withheld from the public on grounds of national security.
The pages are thought to implicate the Saudi Royal Family in financing the supposed hijackers in the United States prior to
the attacks.

Speaking at a press conference regarding the missing pages in 2014, Rep. Thomas Massie lobbied for the release of the
documents stating he read them and that they challenged him to reconsider everything he knew about the event.

"As I read it - we all had our own experience - I had to stop every couple pages and just sort of absorb and try to
rearrange my understanding of history for the past 13 years and years leading up to that. It challenges you to
rethink everything, Massie said.

Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked Jeb Bush on the campaign trail and at debates by raising the issue of 9/11, and the
intelligence warnings that were provided to the Bush administration and subsequently ignored.

Jeb Bush has avoided the issue, and even mocked those who raise it:

Earlier in the week Trump doubled down on the 9/11 accusations, stating:

"I know that the CIA and various other agencies knew that something bad was going to happen and they did
nothing about it. They got it wrong.

The heads of the CIA and the various other agencies werent speaking and it was a big problem, Trump added.

Trumps comments have prompted establishment Republicans and conservative talking heads to label him a 9/11 truther
and a radical kook.

Related: Trump Insider: Trump Will Audit the Fed

In Syria, If You Cant Find Moderates, Dress Up Some Extremists


February 16 2016 | From: LandDestroyer

The BBCs latest production is as absurd as it is transparent and abhorrent.


Upon reading the increasingly desperate headlines pumped out by the Western media as Western-backed terrorist
forces begin to fold under an effective joint Syrian-Russian offensive to take the country back, readers will notice
that though the term moderate rebels or moderate opposition is used often, the Western media is seemingly
incapable of naming a single faction or leader among them.

Related: Journalist Eva Bartlett: Im Back From Syria. The Media Is Lying To You!

The reason for this is because there are no moderates and there never were. Since 2007, the US has conspired to arm and
fund extremists affiliated with Al Qaeda to overthrow the government of Syria and destabilize Iranian influence across the
entire Middle East.

Exposed in Seymour Hershs 2007 article, The Redirection Is the Administrations new policy benefitting our enemies in the
war on terrorism?, it stated explicitly that:

The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these
activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile
to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda."

The catastrophe the Western media constantly cites in its increasingly hysterical headlines is the predictable manifestation
of not Syrian and Russian security operations ongoing in Syria today, but of the conspiracy described by Hersh in 2007 that
has indisputably been put into play, starting in 2011 under the guise of the so-called Arab Spring.
If Major Yaser Abdulrahim looks like hes never wore his FSA uniform out into the field, thats because he hasnt. He is not a member of the FSA at
all, and is instead a commander of the Fatah Halab, an umbrella group for Al Qaeda affiliates armed and funded by both the US and Saudi Arabia.

When the West does attempt to give names and faces to these so-called moderates, it is a simple matter to trace them
directly back to Al Qaeda.

The BBCs Rebel Commander Plays Dress-Up

In a recent video report published by the BBC titled, Syria conflict: Rebels feel abandoned by Britain and US, BBCs
Quentin Sommerville claims he secretly contacted US-backed rebels from Turkey.

The alleged remote interview was covered in both locations by professional camera crews, despite Sommerville claiming
the situation was so bad, the rebels could not be reached. The senior rebel commander inside Aleppo interviewed by the
BBC was none other than Yaser Abdulrahim.
Faylaq Al-Shams flag is clearly seen in the video of the BBCs fake FSA commander when out in the field. Yaser Abdulrahim is seen out among
other terrorists, missing his crisp, brand new FSA uniform and devoid of any FSA insignia.

Despite appearing in a brand new, crisp Free Syrian Army uniform never worn once into the field, and sitting beside an
equally pristine Free Syrian Army French colonial flag, Yaser Abdulrahim has absolutely no affiliations with the otherwise
nonexistent Free Syrian Army.

Despite appearing in a brand new, crisp Free Syrian Army uniform never worn once into the field, and sitting beside an
equally pristine Free Syrian Army French colonial flag, Yaser Abdulrahim has absolutely no affiliations with the otherwise
nonexistent Free Syrian Army.

Syria: Before and after US / NATO 'intervention'

Instead, he is a commander of Faylaq Al-Sham, composed of Al Qaeda terrorists and Muslim Brotherhood extremists.

Faylaq Al-Sham and its commander Yaser Abdulrahim, according to Sommerville himself, are part of the larger Fatah Halab
umbrella group which also includes Al Qaeda affiliates Ahrar ash-Sham and Jaysh al-Islam the latter of which literally
placed civilians in metal cages on rooftops to use as human shields against Syrian-Russian airstrikes.

Human Right Watch, in their report titled, Syria: Armed Groups Use Caged Hostages to Deter Attacks, would reveal that:

In the course of fighting between armed groups and government forces in the nearby `Adra al-`Omalia in
December 2013, Jabhat al-Nusra and Jaysh al-Islam abducted hundreds of civilians, mostly Alawites, according to
the United Nations Commission of Inquiry on Syria.

The hostages, many of them women and children, are being held in unidentified locations in Eastern Ghouta. The
concern is that they are among those in these cages."

The Human Right Watch report is also very alarming, considering it implicates Jaysh al-Islam, a member of Yaser
Abdulrahims Fatah Halab, as collaborating and fighting alongside US State Department listed terrorist group, Jabhat al-
Nusra.

The US State Departments official statement listing al-Nusra as a foreign terrorist organization, titled, Terrorist
Designations of the al-Nusrah Front as an Alias for al-Qaida in Iraq, states:

Since November 2011, al-Nusrah Front has claimed nearly 600 attacks ranging from more than 40 suicide
attacks to small arms and improvised explosive device operations in major city centers including Damascus,
Aleppo, Hamah, Dara, Homs, Idlib, and Dayr al-Zawr.

During these attacks numerous innocent Syrians have been killed. Through these attacks, al-Nusrah has sought to
portray itself as part of the legitimate Syrian opposition while it is, in fact, an attempt by AQI to hijack the struggles
of the Syrian people for its own malign purposes."

It appears, ironically enough, that through the deception of the Western media, al Nusra has been amply assisted in fully
hijacking the struggles of the Syrian people for its own malign purposes.

BBCs US-backed rebel commander heads a faction that includes the terrorist Jaysh al-Islam faction who caged civilians and used them as human
shields outside of Damascus. The US insists that Syria and Russia must negotiate with such organizations and that such organizations should play a
role in Syrias future.

The BBCs abhorrent dressing-up of literal members of Al Qaeda and their affiliates in their recent interview fits into a larger
pattern of deceit aimed at salvaging the conspiracy described by Hersh in 2007, but upended when in late last year, the
Russian Federation upon the invitation of the Syrian government, intervened in the conflict.

With Aleppo teetering at the edge of liberation from what are clearly terrorist forces the BBCs propaganda and
propaganda like it being propagated by the West represents a cynical attempt to perpetuate not end the suffering of the
Syrian people.

What is worse still, is that the BBC claims their Fatah Halab-Al Qaeda umbrella group commander dressed as a member of
the Free Syrian Army, is US-backed.
This is either an attempt by the BBC to further deceive their audiences as to who the man they interviewed really was, or an
inadvertent admission that the United States is in fact funding the very terrorist groups and their associates, populating their
own US State Department list of foreign terrorist organizations.

Whatever the case, the fact that even a carefully staged production like the one published by the BBC is easily exposed as a
deliberate attempt to cover up the terroristic identity of whats left of the Wests rebels, adds further imperative to the Syrian
government and their Russian, Lebanese, Iraqi, and Iranian allies to end the war and fully restore order to the entirety of
Syrias territory.

To negotiate with rebels who are clearly terrorists dressed in literal costumes, is an absurdity the West would never accept
foisted upon them thus, no other nation on Earth should accept the West foisting such terms upon them.

US Intelligence Chief: We Might Use The Internet Of Things To Spy On You


February 13 2016 | From: TheGuardian

James Clapper did not name specific agency as being involved in surveillance via smart-home
devices but said in congressional testimony it is a distinct possibility
The US intelligence chief has acknowledged for the first time that agencies might use a new generation of smart
household devices to increase their surveillance capabilities.

Related: 'Internet of Things' an Absolute Goldmine for Big Brother, Admits Top US Spy

As increasing numbers of devices connect to the internet and to one another, the so-called internet of things promises
consumers increased convenience the remotely operated thermostat from Google-owned Nest is a leading example. But
as home computing migrates away from the laptop, the tablet and the smartphone, experts warn that the security features
on the coming wave of automobiles, dishwashers and alarm systems lag far behind.

In an appearance at a Washington thinktank last month, the director of the National Security Agency, Adm Michael Rogers,
said that it was time to consider making the home devices more defensible, but did not address the opportunities that
increased numbers and even categories of connected devices provide to his surveillance agency.
However, James Clapper, the US director of national intelligence, was more direct in testimony submitted to the Senate on
Tuesday as part of an assessment of threats facing the United States.

"In the future, intelligence services might use the [internet of things] for identification, surveillance, monitoring,
location tracking, and targeting for recruitment, or to gain access to networks or user credentials, Clapper said.

Clapper did not specifically name any intelligence agency as involved in household-device surveillance. But security experts
examining the internet of things take as a given that the US and other surveillance services will intercept the signals the
newly networked devices emit, much as they do with those from cellphones.

Amateurs are already interested in easily compromised hardware; computer programmer John Matherlys search
engine Shodan indexes thousands of completely unsecured web-connected devices.
Online threats again topped the intelligence chiefs list of worldwide threats the US faces, with the mutating threat of low-
intensity terrorism quickly following. While Clapper has for years used the equivocal term evolving when asked about the
scope of the threat, he said Tuesday that Sunni violent extremism has more groups, members, and safe havens than at any
other point in history.

The Islamic State topped the threat index, but Clapper also warned that the US-backed Saudi war in Yemen was
redounding to the benefit of al-Qaidas local affiliate.

Domestically;

"Homegrown extremists are the greatest terrorist threat, rather than Islamic State or al-Qaida attacks planned
from overseas. Clapper cited the San Bernardino and Chattanooga shootings as examples of lethal operations
emanating from self-starting extremists without direct guidance from [Isis] leadership.

US intelligence officials did not foresee Isis suffering significant setbacks in 2016 despite a war in Syria and Iraq that the
Pentagon has pledged to escalate. The chief of defense intelligence, Marine Lt Gen Vincent Stewart, said the jihadist army
would probably retain Sunni Arab urban centers in 2016, even as military leaders pledged to wrest the key cities of Raqqa
and Mosul from it.

Contradicting the US defense secretary, Ashton Carter, Stewart said he was less optimistic in the near term about
Mosul, saying the US and Iraqi government would certainly not retake it in 2016.

The negative outlook comes as Carter traveled on Tuesday to meet with his fellow defense chiefs in Brussels for a
discussion on increasing their contributions against Isis.
On the Iran nuclear deal, Clapper said intelligence agencies were in a distrust and verify mode, but added: We have no
evidence thus far that theyre moving toward violation.

Clappers admission about the surveillance potential for networked home devices is rare for a US official. But in an
overlooked 2012 speech, the then CIA director David Petraeus called the surveillance implications of the internet of things
transformational particularly to their effect on clandestine tradecraft.

During testimony to both the Senate armed services committee and the intelligence panel, Clapper cited Russia, China,
Iran, North Korea and the Islamic State as bolstering their online espionage, disinformation, theft, propaganda and data-
destruction capabilities. He warned that the USs ability to correctly attribute the culprits of those actions would probably
diminish with improving offensive tradecraft, the use of proxies, and the creation of cover organizations.

Clapper suggested that US adversaries had overtaken its online capabilities: Russia and China continue to have the most
sophisticated cyber programs.

The White Houses new cybersecurity initiative, unveiled on Tuesday, pledged increased security for nontraditional
networked home devices. It tasked the Department of Homeland Security to test and certify networked devices within
the Internet of Things. It did not discuss any tension between the USs twin cybersecurity and surveillance priorities.
Connected household devices are a potential treasure trove to intelligence agencies seeking unobtrusive ways to listen and
watch a target, according to a study that Harvards Berkman Center for Internet and Society released last week. The study
found that the signals explosion represented by the internet of things would overwhelm any privacy benefits by users of
commercial encryption even as Clapper in his testimony again alleged that the growth of encryption was having
a negative effect on intelligence gathering.

The reports authors cited a 2001 case in which the FBI had sought to compel a company that makes emergency
communications hardware for automobiles similar by description to OnStar, though the company was not named to
assist agents in Nevada in listening in on conversations in a clients car.

In February 2015, news reports revealed that microphones on Samsung smart televisions were always on so as to
receive any audio that it could interpret as an instruction.

"Law enforcement or intelligence agencies may start to seek orders compelling Samsung, Google, Mattel, Nest or
vendors of other networked devices to push an update or flip a digital switch to intercept the ambient
communications of a target, the authors wrote.

The Truth About How The 'Refugee Crisis' Was Rigged From Start To Finish
February 6 2016 | From: IshtarsGate

I show in this article how the refugee crisis has been rigged, from start to finish, in a kind of multi-
pincer movement which is using mass theatre and false social science to create a delusion in the
minds of the masses.
Its a complex web that has been weaved; so Ive broken it down to its simplest components with links for those
who want to drill down deeper.

So where did it all begin? I find it ironic that many who support open borders and mass migration tell those who can see
disaster writ large in such folly that theyre stuck in the past and that they should move into the 21st century.

They dont realise that theyre mind programmed victims of a staged roll-out of an agenda that follows a plan originally
cooked up around 100 years ago, known as the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan.

The Kalergi plan's aim is the genocide of the white peoples of Europe; to replace the whites with the mixed brown races.
Those who support its aims are rewarded annually with Coudenhove-Kalergi European Prize; two notable previous
recipients have been Angela Merkel and Herman van Rompuy.
The author of the Kalergi plan was one Richard Coudenhove Kalergi, an Austrian diplomat who established the Pan
European movement in Vienna in 1922, in order to create his envisaged New World Order. In his book, Praktischer
Idealismus, he wrote:

The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the
elimination of space, time, and prejudice.

The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of
peoples and the diversity of individuals "

So all this talk about ever-closer union has not been just about the different states of Europe converging; its been about
peoples merging.

The rise of fascism in Europe meant that Kalergis project had to be put on ice for a while. But after the Second World
War, Winston Churchill took it up, along with the Jewish masonic lodge Bnai Brith, and then the usual suspects grabbed it
as the perfect way to create chaos out of which to bring order their own New World Order with one world government.

How Kalergis Plan is Being Rolled out Today

This so-called humanitarian crisis is being sold to us under the bannerhead of the Great Migration in the same way that
we were sold the Arab Spring; both pieces of mind programming depend upon the delusion that whole continents of people
just up and spontaneously decide one morning to either rebel, or leave for pastures new.

The mainstream media is in virtual lockstep behind the Kalergi plan, and so those who are unable to think critically for
themselves are being sucked into the psy-op (psychological operation).

The psy-ops and false flags supporting it are too many to list here, but heres a couple (although really, there only needs
to be one for intelligent people to ask themselves why they are being lied to on a systemic basis.)
This photo (above) shows the full story behind the so-called refugees at risk of drowning stories in our media, with babies
being held up high, out of the deep water. As the man on the top far right shows, far from being at risk of drowning, the
swimmers are in mere feet of water, and could stand up and walk out on to the beach if they wanted to.

What we were actually shown on television and the papers was just the area within the white box. In any kind of
theatre, context is everything.

The so-called riots at Dover in Kent, England, this weekend were also probably staged Id be willing to put money on it
not least because the mainstream media was very quick in its dividing of the participants into right-wing fascists and anti-
fascists (antifa).

When is a Fascist not a Fascist? When hes a Fascist.


This is the narrative that they want us to swallow: those opposing enforced undemocratic mass migration into the UK are
the fascists; those imposing enforced undemocratic mass migration into the UK are just very nice, caring people. Some of
those journos need to go back to school!

The media tried to divide the issue in the exact same way when the women of Cologne protested at the New Year over
more than 800 of them being sexually assaulted by Muslims.

These raped women were described by the media, the BBC among them, as far right Islamophobes and xenophobes and
then the police now out in force after being practically invisible on the night of December 31st turned the water cannons
on them.

And most people are to stupified by fluoride and every other toxin they willingly consume to understand that the elite have used the principle of
incrementalisation for hundereds of years. The TPPA is just another increment...

Most of the dumbed-down consumers of mainstream media wouldnt know a fascist if one jumped up and bit them on the
bum. They have no clue that fascism is akin to having a whole new and much more dangerous way of life being imposed on
you, which, in the case of opening our borders to migrants, no political party so much as mentioned, let alone stood on a
platform for, at the general election less than a year ago.

If it was really a battle between left and right, there would be a choice at the ballot box; there isnt. Whoever you vote for,
you get this staged mass migration.

Im wondering who paid for all those coaches to bus those hooligans into Dover? Did they get a slap-up steak meal and all
the beer they could drink thrown in with their charabanc day out to the seaside? It reminded me of the old days of football
hooliganism in the Eighties and Nineties, in which our boys used to terrorise most of the major football matches across
Europe.

It might surprise some to learn that that was organised terror too; some of those hooligans directing the Newcastle Brown-
fuelled fear n loathing on the Euro-terraces had MI5 connections.

There are dozens of examples of similar staged events in this recent crisis the few women and children in a marching
column of mainly male refugees are told to come to the front for the photographers; then there was the drowned baby that
was moved and posed a certain way before his image was sent out across the world.

This isnt to say that there arent real refugees caught up in this theatre; but it is to say that the number of migrant
opportunists from all over Africa, not just Syria, far outweighs the number of genuine refugees, including those at the camp
at Calais.

Even on a technical-legal basis, none of those at Calais are refugees because they dont meet the UNs criteria of claiming
asylum in the first country they come to. The jungle inhabitants have not claimed asylum in the first country they reached
after crossing the Mediterranean further, they are also not claiming asylum where they are, in France, because they want
to come to Britain.
The truth is that those living in the cold and squalor on the Calais coast dont have to; they are choosing to, for obvious
reasons.

They are being funded by the charity No Borders, aka George Soros, and also encouraged by the Labour leader Jeremy
Corbyn who told them, last weekend, that they should be allowed to come to Britain, after which about 400 of them stormed
the P&O ferry.
How Else are they Selling it?

The media narrative has been based upon a three-fold pincer movement; the employers are being seduced with a bright
orange GM carrot of cheap, uncomplaining labour while the dumbed-down masses are having their egos flattered with the
idea of cultural enrichment, whatever they think that is.

The third component of this psy-op is a phoney war, designed to awaken the saviour complexes in those whove never gone
within to face their own dark sides. If youve not seen it in yourself, you cannot recognise it in others and you live in a
permanent rainbow-coloured fug as you blithely and blindly pave the road to hell with your good intentions.

Heres how the three components unravel

The Economics

In terms of economic benefits to a nation of mass migration, a recent report showed that this is a myth that most migrants
are unemployed for years, and that countries dont see a benefit for at least a generation.

The report for German paper Die Welt entitled The Truth about the Refugee Job Wonder asks if German
Chancellor Angela Merkels pronouncement that migrants will be the labour revitalisation of Germany is actually
true? It turns out Syrians, Afghans and Iraqis are more likely to be unemployed than the average German by a
large margin.

The Institute for Employment Research (IAB) has conducted research into migrant employment rates and found
that in the case of Syrians their employment rate has dropped from 32 percent to only 9 percent as recently as last
November.

Afghanis and Iraqis, who are increasingly becoming a larger proportion of migrants coming into the
EU according to Frontex, dont fare much better, with Afghan employment participation going from 37.6 percent to
24.5 percent and Iraqi employment going from 34 percent to 25.3 percent over the same five year period. To put
this in perspective, the employment rate of the average German is 67.3 percent.
Migrants have an especially difficult time and even those with professional qualifications tend to have a hard time
becoming employed. It is actually easier, according to the report, for an unskilled native worker.

According to IFO Institute for Economic Research migration expert Gabriel Felbermayr, We know that people who
come as refugees are much more difficult to integrate into the labor market than those who immigrate to work, and
said, Usually it takes at least a generation, until the employment rate, has approached the domestic population.

This amount of time to enter the workforce presents huge problems for the welfare system that the migrants are
thought to be able to prop up.

Often the countries which they come from improve and conditions allow them to go back, meaning a zero return on
investment from the costs associated with housing and education.

Employers often fail to recognise the qualifications of migrants from Africa and the Middle East as they have found
their education not comparable to a European equivalent qualification. This leads many former professionals to be
forced into low paid work and the report says, for companies, the refugees are mainly a source of unskilled, low
cost labour and not the engineers and academics many media sources have said.

The "Cultural Enrichment'

As for cultural enrichment please see this article A Call to the Grailseekers and for a sense of national identity, check
out a new genetic map of Britain which shows that there has been little movement of people in the British Isles from the
original tribal kingdoms established 1,500 years ago.
Added to that, 89 per cent of our DNA derives from the early farmers that settled here about 10,000 years ago. In other
words, our roots are burrowed deep into this land; weve fought off many invaders with their cultural enrichment in the past
and we aim to keep it that way.

The Phoney War?

So surely there are real refugees fleeing from our bombs in Syria and Iraq and therefore we owe it to them, to offer them
refuge? Well, yes and no and mainly no.

First off, the smaller number of Syrian refugees who are mixed in with the mass migration of economic chancers are not
fleeing from our bombs; they are fleeing from Russias bombs. Theres a reason why Putin has been able to make such
huge inroads in destroying ISIS since he began bombing at the start of this refugee crisis.

It was because our aka the Nato coalitions attempts to destroy ISIS over the past couple of years have been at best
pathetic, and at worst, utterly fraudulent.

Secondly, why would the Nato guys want to wipe out an army they had trained, funded and armed with stinger missiles on
behalf of their Jewish allies? The answer is, they wouldnt.

But heres one very telling example of the phoney war: the use, or rather non-use, of the Brimstone missile.

The fact that the British RAF had this unique weapon, the Brimstone missile, was the keystone of the parliamentary debate
last December. It was cited as the main reason for our allies needing our paltry few Tornado jets to enter the conflict in Syria
because this 100,000 missile, with radar guidance on its nose, can take out a vehicle travelling at 70 mph.
However, it wasnt deployed for more than a month after the debate, and questions were starting to be asked even on
mainstream political programmes . Why, some bolder journos dared to inquire, has there been such a lack of activity from
the RAF over Syria since the debate, and much more importantly, why has it not yet deployed the all-important Brimstone
missile?

Finally, after much pressure, the RAF finally came to life a few weeks ago and, according to the Ministry of Defence, there
were two sorties over Syria one which took out an ISIS supply truck in Raqqa and another which targetted mobile cranes
at an oilfield close to the Iraq/Syria border.

With the truck at Raqqa, and possibly with the mobile cranes, (unconfirmed) the RAF finally used their famous Brimstone
missile.
However, it soon became clear, and was even reported by the defence correspondent on the Daily Politics on BBC2, that
there had been no tactical need to use the 100,000-a-throw Brimstone for either of these military targets. The truck at
Raqqa and the mobile cranes at an oilfield on the Iraq/Syria were not travelling at anything like 70 mph and much lesser
expensive missiles, like the lasar-guided Paveway, could have just as easily and much more cheaply been deployed.

On top of that, the same BBC defence correspondent reported that there have been no reports of civilian casualties coming
out of Syria; not that we want civilian casualties, of course, but in modern warfare, they are unavoidable. No civilian
casualties = no military action.

Last year, just before Putin stepped in, some American flyers were reporting that they were being sent out on missions over
ISIS-held territories, and then just left to circle around the target area, until they were nearly out of fuel, before being called
back to base. This means that in many cases, they were unable to drop their payloads.

On top of that, we then had the spectacle of the drivers of the trucks which were carrying ISISs oil into Turkey being warned
by an airdrop of leaflets to leave their vehicles, because they were going to be bombed.
Talking of Turkey well thats another whole can of worms that we dont have the time to go into here. Suffice to say,
Turkey has been acting as middle man for ISISs oil, and it has also been organising cheap flights for refugees directly into
Germany.

To conclude, when you add up all the evidence and theres only a smidgen of it in this article we carry very little
responsibility for those that have got themselves mixed up in the so-called Great Migration.

Having gone through all these arguments with those who are in favour of helping the refugees, and explaining it all
thoroughly, this is usually the response:

But its not about whos to blame, nor about economics or legal technicalities! Its about being human. Wouldnt we
hate to see ourselves as selfish and uncaring people? How can we turn them away? How could we sleep at
night?

To me, though, its not about a nice, cosy, satisfying self image; its about survival.

The bald truth is, if we open up our borders to let in this so-called Great Migration, well never sleep soundly in our beds
again.

Dear Western Peoples; There Is No Freedom Without Truth


February 4 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

Dwight D. Eisenhower was a five-star general in charge of the Normandy Invasion and a popular
two-term President of the United States. Today he would be called a conspiracy theorist.
Were Ike to be issuing his warning from the White House today, conservative Republicans like Senators Lindsey
Graham (R-SC) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) would be screaming at Ike for impugning the motives of the patriotic
industry that protects our freedom.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American
experience. The total influence - economic, political, even spiritual - is felt in every city, every statehouse, every
office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development.

Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is
the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of
unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex.

The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take
nothing for granted.

Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military
machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.

- President Dwight D. Eisenhower

Comment: Eisenhower was a card-carrying member of the cabal, but the statements he made in later years such as
the on above indicate that he had reconsidered his actions and was trying to issue a warning.

Dwight D. Eisenhower was a five-star general in charge of the Normandy Invasion and a popular two-term President of the
United States. Today he would be called a conspiracy theorist.
Were Ike to be issuing his warning from the White House today, conservative Republicans like Senators Lindsey Graham
(R-SC) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) would be screaming at Ike for impugning the motives of the patriotic industry that protects
our freedom.

Neoconservatives such as William Kristol would be demanding to know why President Eisenhower was issuing warnings
about our own military-industrial complex instead of warning about the threat presented by the Soviet military.

The presstitute media would be implying that Ike was going a bit senile in his old age, a tactic the presstitutes used against
President Reagan as he struggled to end stagflation and the Cold War.

By January 17, 1961, when Eisenhower issued his warning in his farewell address to the American People, it was already
too late.
Cold Warriors had had their hooks into the American taxpayer for 15 years after the end of WW II, and the military-industrial
complex had replaced mom and apple pie as the most venerated and entrenched US interest. The Dulles brothers ran the
State Department and CIA and overthrew governments at will. (Read The Brothers)

The military-industrial complex had learned that regardless of the protestations of high-ranking military officers, no cost-
overrun, no matter how egregious, went unpaid. Armaments industries and military bases were spread all over the country
and were important considerations for every senator and many congressional districts.

The chairmen of House and Senate military appropriations subcommittees and armed services committees were already
dependent on campaign contributions from the military-industrial complex and for cushy jobs should they lose an election.

The Cold War was a profitable business that served many, and that is why it lasted so long.
Not to be too literal, the cold war was not all about Siberia, of course

There was never any threat of the Red Army invading Europe. Stalin declared socialism in one country and purged the
Communist Party of the Trotskyist element that preached world revolution. An accommodation could have been reached,
except that for the first time ever the military-industrial complex saw that it could keep the war business going for decades
and perhaps forever.

George F. Kennan predicted that should the Soviet Union sink tomorrow under the waters of the ocean;

Another adversary would have to be invented. Anything else would be an unacceptable shock to the American
economy.

When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the Soviet threat was replaced with the Muslim threat and the War on Terror
took over from the Cold War. Despite a succession of false flag attacks and warnings of a thirty years war, a few thousand
lightly armed jihadists were an insufficient replacement for the Soviet Union and its thousands of nuclear ICBMs.

It was an uncomfortable notion that the worlds only superpower could not dispose of a few [manufactured] terrorists.
Related: War, Terrorism And The Global Economic Crisis In 2015: One Hundred And Thirteen Interrelated Concepts

So we are back to the Cold War with Russia. The propaganda is fast and furious.

Putin is the new Hitler.

Russia invaded Ukraine.

"Russia is about to invade the Baltics and Poland.

Putin is a corrupt multi-billionaire.

Putin is scheming to recreate the Soviet Union.

Comment: Nothing but crybaby Khazarian Nazi Zionist Mafia tantrum rhetoric - because they are being taken down
and they know it - and now everyone can see it.

Vladimir Putin has called; end exposed the corrupt Western faux 'leadership' for who and what they are.
The accusations made towards Putin became headlines despite US military spending being a dozen or more times higher
than Russian military spending and the Russian government expressing no hegemonic aspirations.

Eisenhowers sucessor, John F. Kennedy, realized that the military-security complex was a threat, but he underestimated
the threat and paid for it with his life when he stood up to the military-security complex.

Related: Securing The Global Collateral Accounts: Neil Keenan Update

In stating this fact I have joined Eisenhower as a conspiracy theorist. (For a hair-raising account of the threat posed to
President Kennedy by General Lyman Lemnitzer, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, read chapter three in Richard
Cottrells book, Gladio, NATOs Dagger at the Heart of Europe.)
Conspiracies are real. There are many more of them than people are aware.

Many government conspiracies are heavily documented by governments themselves with the official records demonstrating
the conspiracies openly available to the public. Just google, for example, Operation Gladio or the Northwoods Project.
These conspiracies alone are sufficient to chastise those uninformed Western peoples who go around saying;

Our government would never kill its own people.

Perhaps Russian studies provided my introduction to government conspiracies against their own people. I learned that the
Tsars secret police set off bombs and killed people in order to blame and arrest labor agitators. I was skeptical of this
account and wondered if it was a reflection of left-wing bias against Tsarist Russia.

Some years later I asked my colleague, Robert Conquest, at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University if the account was
true. He replied that the story is true as is known from the released secret police files that are part of the Hoover Institutions
archives.

False flag attacks are used by governments in order to pursue secret agendas that they cannot publicly acknowledge. If
President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney had said:

We are going to attack Iraq and a half dozen other countries in order to exercise hegemony over the Middle East,
steal their oil, and clear the path for Israel to steal the entirety of the West Bank of Palestine, diverting taxpayers
resources from serving the American people into the pockets of the armaments industries and spilling the blood of
your parents, spouses, children, and siblings, even the American sheeple would have resisted."
Instead, following the famous advice of Hitlers chief propagandist, they said:

Our country has been attacked!

Generally speaking, an observant person with a bit of education can recognize a false flag attack.

Related: The First Question To Ask After Any Terror Attack: Was It A False Flag?

However, few people pay attention beyond what the official media says, and the media no longer investigates and questions
but simply repeats the official story. Therefore, only a few realize what has really happened, and when these few open their
mouths they are discredited as conspiracy theorists.

This method of control might be wearing thin. There have been so many false flag terrorist attacks in the 21st century that
there are now thousands of experts labeled as conspiracy theorist.

For example, the 9/11 Truth Movement consists of thousands of high rise architects, structural engineers, demolition
experts, nano-chemists, physicists, firefighters and first responders, civilian and military pilots, and former high government
officials.

Related: Jeremy Corbyn: 9/11 Was 'Manipulated' + Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel As Being
The Actual 9/11 Terrorists & RT Declares 9/11 An Inside Job

Collectively these experts represent far more knowledge and experience than the 9/11 Commission, which did nothing but
write down whatever the government told the commission, NIST, a collection of people whose incomes and careers depend
on the government, and the presstitutes who can barely manage arithemetic, much less the mathematics of controlled
demolition.
The neoconservatives, who conrolled the George W. Bush regime, called for a New Pearl Harbor so that they could begin
their wars of conquest in the Middle East.

A New Pearl Harbor is what 9/11 gave them. Was this a coincidence or a Gulf of Tonkin or a Reichstag fire or a Tzarist
secret police or Operation Gladio bomb?

The charge, conspiracy theory, is used to prevent investigation.

9/11 was not investigated. Indeed, as many experts have pointed out, there was a conscious effort to remove and destroy
the evidence before it could be investigated. The 9/11 families had to lobby and protest for a solid year before the Bush
regime consented to the totally controlled 9/11 Commission.

The Boston Marathon Bombing was not investigated. A scripted story was issued and repeated by the media. The San
Bernardino shootings were not investigated. Again, a pre-scripted story took the place of investigation.

The success of false flag attacks in the US led to their use in the UK and France. The Charlie Hebdo affair was not
investigated and the official explanation makes no sense. The story has been closed with all the loose ends dangling.

For example, why did a French police official investigating the crime allegedly commit suicide in his police office in the early
hours of the morning, and why was his family denied the autopsy report? What happened to this disappeared story?

Why did the police finger a third participant in the attack as the getaway driver who had an iron clad alibi? If the police were
so totally wrong about this member of the gang, how do we know they are right about the two men they shot to death.

How come alleged perpetrators of terrorist attacks are always killed before they can talk?

How come the only story we ever get is what the government says? How can people be so gullible after the Gulf of Tonkin,
Operation Gladio, etc.?

Apparently the Charlie Hebdo attack was insufficient for the purpose, and now France has had what is called the Paris
attack, an even more unbelievable event, evidence for which is missing.
This false flag attack was too much for Kevin Barrett who assembled a collection of skeptical essays from 26 people into a
book, Another French False Flag: Bloody Tracks From Paris To San Bernardino.

Twenty-four of these contributors do not believe the official story. Does this make them conspiracy theorists, or does this
make them brave souls who are concerned that Reichstag fire type events are replacing Western civil liberty with fascist
police states?

Ask yourself, why are those trying to preserve liberty denounced?

What incentive does contributor A.K. Dewdney, Professor Emeritus at the University of Western Ontario, author of ten
books about science and mathematics, have to be a conspiracy theorist?

What incentive does Philip Giraldi, former CIA case officer and Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest,
have to be a conspiracy theorist?

What incentive does Anthony Hall, Professor of Globalization Studies at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada,
whose latest book has been endorsed by the American Library Association as a scholarly tour de force, have to be a
conspiracy theorist?
What incentive does Mujahid Kamran, Vice Chancellor of Punjab University, Lahore, Pakistan, a Fulbright Scholar and
recipient of numerous awards, have to be a conspiracy theorist?

What incentive does Stephen Lendman, syndicated columnist and host on the Progressive Radio News Hour, have to be a
conspiracy theorist?

What incentive does James Petras, Bartle Professor of Sociology at Binghamton University, have to be a conspiracy
theorist?

What incentive does Alain Soral, one of Frances public intellectuals, have to be a conspiracy theorist?

What incentive does Robert David Steele, former CIA Clandestine Services Officer, have to be a conspiracy theorist?
Related: Ex-CIA Officer Claims That Open Source Revolution Is About To Overthrow Global Oligarchy

The neocons whores in the Western media who call these people conspiracy theorists are so stupid and
unintelligent as to be unqualified to express any opinion.

Dear Western Peoples, if you wish to be able to walk down the streets of your cities without being accosted by
police, demanded to present identity papers, searched, detained indefinitely or assassinated without due process
of law, if you wish to be able to express your opinion about your government and its use of your tax payments, if
you wish to be able to discuss current affairs or your personal affairs without being recorded by the NSA or the
equivalent in your own country or by both, if you wish to be able to act on your moral conscience and to protest the
violence the West applies to Muslims and others unfavored by powerful Western interests, such as Palestinians, if
you wish to live in the freedom that was achieved in the West after centuries of struggle, wake up, find time from
less meaningful pursuits to become aware of what is being stolen from you. It is late in the game.

If you do not stand up for truth, you will have no freedom as there is no freedom without truth.

Related: People Are Finally Learning About False Flag Terror

How The Nazis Won WWII And Are Running The USA
February 3 2016 | From: BeforeItsNews

As Mark Twain enjoyed pointing out that history may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme.
It might as well look like this. Seriously

This statement has never been more true than it is today with the mainstream resurgence of the ideas of Adolph
Hitler.

Related: Were Hitler & Nazism Zionist Creations?

The Nazis Are Making An Historical Comeback

Adolph Hitlers book, Mein Kampf is sweeping through Germany and also through much of Europe. It is, once again,
becoming a best-selling book. Why? Because in desperate times, people turn to desperate measures in an attempt to rectify
the economic, social and political quagmire that people now find themselves stuck in.

The Civilized World Is Crumbling

Europe is on fire. The global elite have exported and overwhelmed the culture and the infrastructure of Europe through
uncontrolled Muslim immigration. France is still reeling from the ISIS attack that paralyzed Paris with only seven Jihadis
participating, back in December of 2015.

Sweden and Germany are becoming the well-documented rape capitals of the world with Muslim refugees who are
increasingly targeting local women for assault and rape.

Are all Muslim refugees involved? Of course not. However, even the FBI acknowledges the fact that 10% of all Muslims have
been radicalized and should be considered to be a national security threat.

The residents of Europe are learning this lesson and very soon, so will American citizens.

Subsequently, in an attempt to protect themselves, the people of Europe have given resurgence to Hitlers solutions in
response to the problems that have befallen Europe, and these solutions are firmly taking hold among an increasing number
of Europeans.
Related: The History And Mission Of The Nazi-Illuminati Bush (Scher(f)f) Crime Family

With Canada presently plunging into the depth of a catastrophic depression, the Canadians will likely become the next major
country to fall under the spell of Adolph Hitler. In The Common Sense Shows interview with Steve Quayle, Steve also
mentioned that Mein Kampf and the Nazi philosophy is enjoying an unparalleled resurgence.

Consider what Yahoo News recently printed about the rise in interest of Hitlers brand of politics in Europe:

"Berlin (AFP) The first reprint of Hitlers Mein Kampf in Germany since World War II has proved more popular
than expected, its publisher said Thursday, with pre-orders almost four times above its first print-run.

Steve Quayle Saw All of This Coming

Steve Quayle Is the author of Empire Beneath the Ice-How the Nazis Won World War II.

Steve Quayle was recently the special guest of The Common Sense Show. He is the author of a fascinating book that is
sweeping the nation and the world. The book is entitled Empire Beneath the Ice, How the Nazis won World War II.

Dave Hodges and Steve discussed the fact that most of the key Nazis survived the end of World War II. Steve would argue
that the Nazis never went away.
In his book, he documents how Hitler and several top Nazis
escaped the hangmans noose.

Many prominent Nazis were brought to America and


occupied many key positions in our government along with
many of its key affiliated partners (e.g. Wernher Von Braun
and NASA).

Steve Quayle is absolutely correct as my own father worked


with these captured Nazi scientists and my father predicted
in 1985 that this Nazification had already been visited
upon the United States and it was only going to get worse.

In our interview, Steve pointed out that we are not just


looking at the rebirth of Hitlers ideas, we will also witness,
as pointed out in the Book of Daniel, that Christians will
soon be persecuted in this nation.

One might reasonably believe that the globalists will use the
rise of Hitlers ideas to give birth to a new form of fascism
that will become the standard bearer of planetary
unification.

Listen to Dave Hodges interview with Steve Quale here.

Related: Russia's Had Enough: No More 'Business as


Usual' With US

Why The Fascist US Can Never Defeat Mother Russia


January 29 2016 | From: Sott

White-supremacist American imperialists have dreamed of defeating and dismembering Russia


since at least the 1920's and early '30's when most of America's elite.
Consisting of the likes of John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, Andrew Mellon, Henry Ford, William Randolph Hearst,
Joseph Kennedy (father of JFK and RFK), and Prescott Bush (father of George H.W. Bush and grandfather of
George W. Bush) - decided to massively bankroll Hitler and the Nazi Party, with a view to eradicating the "mongrel"
Soviet Union and the Jews of Europe along the way (as documented here, here, and here) - although
their attempted coup against FDR miserably failed (and FDR still pardoned his fellow patricians "for the good of the
country." What else?)

Once Germany's massive rearmament got under way, it was the German factories of Ford, General Motors, General
Electric, and Alcoa that built most of the tanks and warplanes of Hitler's dreaded Wehrmacht, while Dupont and
Standard Oil (now Exxon) supplied the synthetic fuel.

For their part, Coca-Cola provided tons of Germany's favorite caffeinated soft drink to keep Luftwaffe pilots "coked
up" for their long bombing runs.

IBM's punch-card record-keeping, in turn, made the Holocaust possible on an industrial scale: which by one
estimate led to the deaths not just of 6 million Jews, but also 5.5 - 7 million Ukrainians, 3.3 million Russian POWs, 2
million Russian civilians, 3 million Poles, and 1.5 million Yugoslavs.

What marked these non-Jewish populations for extermination was that they were all assumed to be either "pure blood" or
"mixed blood" Slavs - whom Hitler lumped together with Jews as untermenschen (i.e. subhumans) in Mein Kampf. (Which
the Neo-Nazis of "Aryan" Ukraine often quote with approval in relation to Slavic Ukrainians and Russians to this day.)

The American Aryan imperialists took it for granted, of course, that the German Wehrmacht would roll right over their those
Russian Orthodox "subhumans."

But after months of house to house, even room to room fighting, it was the Nazis who surrendered at Stalingrad on February
2, 1943.

At that point, the head of the US Office of Strategic Services, former wealthy Wall Street lawyer, Allen Dulles, realized that
Hitler would soon lose the war; and that it was now up to the United States, as the sole remaining capitalist superpower, to
don the invisible mantle of fascism as the only ideology tough enough to defend Godly Capitalism against Godless
Communism with its demonic dream of economic equality. What poor peasant or worker would not vote for equal wealth if
he had the chance?
That's why democracies are disastrous for the 1%, Dulles reasoned. Fascism is the only way. Make the masses feel
exceptional - not equal. And if they still demand their own fair share, shoot em dead! The Nazis had that part down pat.

"So why not use these fellow Aryans?" Dulles thought. And he came up with a treasonous plan for the benefit of the 1%
which he hid from the dying FDR. That was to have the top Nazi generals, intelligence officials, scientists, and the like
surrender to the Americans, rather than the Soviets.

Then after their files were "scrubbed" clean of any atrocities they might have committed for the Third Reich (or their own
amusement), they'd be shipped off in the "right" direction. The best and brightest were sent to America to work in
Intelligence or Defense or, in the case of Werner Von Braun, they were put in charge of our missile program.

Whereas the worst of the worst were smuggled into South America to start fascist movements there.
Or if they were really, really bad and high-profile figures too - like Josef Mengele or Adolf Eichmann, say - they might simply
be told: "Just lie on a beach and enjoy your memories." The rest were placed in positions of power and influence in the
Postwar German government or elsewhere.

Comment: "Under Operation Paperclip, which began in May of 1945, the scientists who helped the Third
Reich wage war continued their weapons-related work for the U.S. government, developing rockets,
chemical and biological weapons, aviation and space medicine (for enhancing military pilot and astronaut
performance), and many other armaments at a feverish and paranoid pace that came to define the Cold War,"

Jacobsen writes. Her book is titled Operation Paperclip: The Secret Intelligence Program that Brought Nazi
Scientists to America. See more:

CIA's denial of protecting Nazis is blatant lie

America hired Nazis to test LSD and CIA interrogation techniques on Soviet spies, new book claims

Operation Nazification: How the Third Reich lived on through the USA
Flash forward to today, and American imperialists have much to be proud of. Communism is dead, and so is Arab
nationalism, except in Syria under Bashar al-Assad. Sadly for me as a Christian, so too is Liberation Theology in South
America. Can you picture Archbishop Romero being shot through the heart as he said Mass at the altar?

His life's blood mixing with the Blood of Christ? Is there nothing that our fascist elites will not order their death squads to do?
And laugh about it too?

Watch Hillary Clinton crack up at the breaking news of Muammar Gaddafi's mutilation-murder at the hands of our
"moderate" terrorists.

"We came. We saw. He died."

She crows with Satanic glee - using the royal "We." What a monster of depravity! The man has just had his throat slit--
after being sodomized with a bayonet, and she's downright giddy about it! She even wants to claim all the credit for
herself. This Satanic atrocity! By linking his mutilation/murder to her trip to Benghazi.

What would she have us think? That she gave "our" terrorists strict instructions to rape him with a bayonet first? She even
mangles Caesar's famous line to drive her sick claim home

She does believe she's another Caesar. She's that demonically deranged. She wants to show the world she's got the
biggest "balls" around--when she has none. Her pant suits fool no one.

Comment: His description of Killary Hillary Clinton is quite accurate, however history, when critically analyzed,
paints a different portrait of Caesar, who actually bears much more of a resemblance to Putin: [?!]

SOTT Talk Radio: Julius Caesar - Evil Dictator or Messiah for Humanity?

Caesar's Rome and today

The Gospel of Caesar: Documentary reveals true origins of the 'Passion of Christ'

Putin would never behave like that. Not in a million years! He's far too moral a man - too compassionate a man - too
Orthodox a man - to brag that he somehow incited a lynch-mob to mutilate and murder a helpless man. As Jesus
tells us in Matthew 25:40: it is the same as inciting a lynch-mob to mutilate and murder Christ Himself.

Indeed Putin's friends report that Putin felt extreme guilt over Gaddafi's mutilation/murder, having allowed himself
to be fooled by those fork-tongued Americans into approving a UN Resolution which he believed only authorized
NATO to keep Gaddafi from committing genocide against the people of Benghazi, but which was actually intentionally
so vaguely worded as to give NATO carte blanche to do what it pleased--even to murdering Gaddafi in this sickest of ways.

Is it carrying a sense of responsibility too far, to blame himself for being deceived? Many psychologists might say so. But as
a Christian psychologist myself, with over 40 years of training and experience (if that Biblical number tells you something), I
would say that the depth of his guilt shows the depth of his compassion. And the depth of his compassion shows the
depth of Putin's Orthodox faith.
Not that Putin is exceptional in this regard. Quite the contrary. He is a typical Orthodox man in the depth of his faith. That is
the basis of his enormous popularity and power. He is just like them. He is Everyman.. And this is why the Orthodox faithful
have such trust in him. He is a plain-spokenman of his word.

And while that fact may have led him to assume too readily that Americans can be trusted to live up to their word as
well, Putin is a quick learner; and will not be fooled by them again. Did not Jesus Himself warn him in Matthew 7:15 to
beware of such men who: " come to you in sheep's clothing," but are "ravening wolves within?"

Putin thought Erdogan could be trusted as well. But after the Russian plane was shot down, he saw the "ravening
wolf" in Erdogan too. And when it comes to meting out just punishment, Putin has as much Christian patience as anyone.

This is why the Satanic West can never defeat Holy Russia. Though the West has long since lost its Christian moorings, as
Hillary Clinton shows so well, patience is not a weakness. Nor are modesty, humility, and compassion. These are
Putin's personal qualities. (If you watch RT, you can see them). But they are not his uniquely.

Though I'm not Russian, I would say from my dealings with many Russians over the years as a psychologist that these
particular qualities typify devout Russian Orthodox men like Putin. That's why most Russians trust Putin - whether they
themselves are Orthodox or not. They know the type. And men possessed of Orthodox virtues make for undefeatable
Christian warriors: just ask Hitler.
Whereas our generals drew the wrong lesson from World War II; and decided that the Allies would have beaten the Nazis
single-handedly (or so the Serpent whispered in their ears) all the quicker if only our troops had embraced the Satanic
"virtues" of pride, cruelty, and demonization-of-the-enemy. And we've been demonizing our troops ever since--with the
results one can see.

But Russia also has a loving kind of weapon that has long protected it. It sees all of Russia as Mother Russia (In
Russian: -). Think about it for a sec. Germany has no motherland, just a fatherland. And the USA doesn't
even have that. If one goes to a patriotic film here about, say, an American sniper blowing off the heads of defenseless
"towel-heads," a bunch of tattooed ex-Marines may get up and shout: "USA! USA! USA!"

But we have no motherland. France tried to plant the seed with the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor. But a mother is
supposed to open her arms to all her children--even brown ones. And the US government didn't want those brown "tired and
poor" on our shores, so the idea of a motherland never really stuck. In fact, we've tended to exterminate or enslave all none-
whites. Hitler even said he took his racial policies from us!
Russia, on the other hand, has always been a multi-religious, multi-cultural, multi-ethnic land of abundant resources,
stretching across 12 time zones. So it's always been natural to think of "her" as a mother. For what is a mother? One who
feeds and shelters her children. And when they grow to adulthood, her sons and daughters, in turn, protect and care for her.

Thus the concept of Mother Russia elicits feelings of love, loyalty and protectiveness that go far, far beyond post-
Renaissance notions of the nation-state and the kind of patriotism a given nation-state--especially under the aegis of
austerity--might arouse. Those who see Russia as their Mother will give back the very lives she once gave them to
defend her.
The author is a licensed clinical psychologist and long-time activist for progressive causes, who lives and practices in New
York. He wrote this article specially for Russia Insider

Comment: As Edgar Cayce predicted over 80 years ago, Russia has become the hope of the world and a beacon of light in
the dark times that have been brought on by US/NATO western imperialism with the ruling psychopaths at the helm:

"In Russia there comes the hope of the world, not as that sometimes termed of the communistic, or Bolshevik,
no; but freedom, freedom! That each man will live for his fellow man! The principle has been born. It will take
years for it to be crystallised, but out of Russia comes again the hope of the world."

- Edgar Cayce, 1944, No. 3976-29

Winston Churchill: Britains Greatest Briton Left A Legacy Of Global Conflict And
Crimes Against Humanity
January 27 2016 | From: GlobalResearch

Sunday January 24th 2016 marks the anniversary of the death of one of the most lionized leaders
in the Western world: Sir Winston Churchill.

The current British Prime Minister, David Cameron, has called Churchill the greatest ever Prime Minister, and
Britons have recently voted him as the greatest Briton to have ever lived.

The story that British schoolbooks tell children about Churchill is of a British Bulldog, with unprecedented moral bravery and
patriotism. He, who defeated the Nazis during World War II and spread civilisation to indigenous people from all corners of
the globe. Historically, nothing could be further from the truth.

To the vast majority of the world, where the sun once never set on the British empire, Winston Churchill remains a great
symbol of racist Western imperialist tyranny, who stood on the wrong side of history.
The myth of Churchill is Britains greatest propaganda tool because it rewrites Churchills true history in order to whitewash
Britains past imperialist crimes against humanity. The Churchill myth also perpetuates Britains ongoing neo-colonial and
neo-liberal policies, that still, to the is day, hurt the very people around the world that Churchill was alleged to have helped
civilise.

The same man whose image is polished and placed on British mantelpieces as a symbol of all that is Great about Britain
was an unapologetic racist and white supremacist. I hate Indians, they are a beastly people with a beastly religion, he once
bellowed. As Churchill put it, Palestinians were simply barbaric hordes who ate little but camel dung.

In 1937, he told the Palestine Royal Commission:

I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of
Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-
grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.

It is unsurprising that when Barack Obama became President, he returned to Britain a bust of Churchill which he found on
his desk in the Oval office. According to historian Johann Hari, Mr. Obamas Kenyan grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama,
was imprisoned without trial for two years and was tortured on Churchills watch, for daring to resist Churchills empire.

Apart from being an unrepentant racist, Churchill was also a staunch proponent of the use of terrorism as a weapon of
war.

During the Kurdish rebellion against the British dictatorship in 1920, Churchill remarked that he simply did not understand
the squeamishness surrounding the use of gas by civilized Great Britain as a weapon of terror. I am strongly in favour
of using gas against uncivilised tribes, it would spread a lively terror, he remarked.
In the same year, as Secretary of State for War, Churchill sent the infamous Black and Tans to Ireland to fight the IRA. The
group became known for vicious terrorist attacks on civilians which Churchill condoned and encouraged.

While today Britons celebrate Churchills legacy, much of the world outside the West mourns the legacy of a man who
insisted that it was the solemn duty of Great Britain to invade and loot foreign lands because in Churchills own words
Britains Aryan stock is bound to triumph.

Churchills legacy in the Far East, Middle East, South Asia and Africa is certainly not one of an affable British Lionheart,
intent on spreading civilization amongst the natives of the world. To people of these regions the imperialism, racism, and
fascism of a man like Winston Churchill can be blamed for much of the worlds ongoing conflicts and instability.

As Churchill himself boasted, he created Jordan with a stroke of a pen one Sunday afternoon, thereby placing many
Jordanians under the brutal thumb of a throneless Hashemite prince, Abdullah. Historian Michael R. Burch recalls how the
huge zigzag in Jordans eastern border with Saudi Arabia has been called Winstons Hiccup or Churchills Sneeze
because Churchill carelessly drew the expansive boundary after a generous lunch.

Churchill also invented Iraq. After giving Jordan to Prince Abdullah, Churchill, the great believer in democracy that he was,
gave Prince Abdullahs brother Faisal an arbitrary patch of desert that became Iraq. Faisal and Abdullah were war buddies
of Churchills friend T. E. Lawrence, the famous Lawrence of Arabia.

Much like the clumsy actions in Iraq of todays great Empire, Churchills imperial foreign policy caused decades of instability
in Iraq by arbitrarily locking together three warring ethnic groups that have been bleeding heavily ever since. In Iraq,
Churchill bundled together the three Ottoman vilayets of Basra that was predominantly Shiite, Baghdad that was Sunni, and
Mosul that was mainly Kurd.
Ask almost anyone outside of Iraq who is responsible for the unstable mess that Iraq is in today and they are likely to say
one word, either Bush or America. However, if you asked anyone within Iraq who is mainly responsible for Iraqs
problems over the last half century and they are likely to simply say Churchill.

Winston Churchill convened the 1912 Conference in Cairo to determine the boundaries of the British Middle Eastern
mandate and T.E. Lawrence was the most influential delegate. Churchill did not invite a single Arab to the conference, which
is shocking but hardly surprising since in his memoirs Churchill said that he never consulted the Arabs about his plans for
them.

The arbitrary lines drawn in Middle Eastern sand by Churchillian imperialism were never going to withstand the test of time.
To this day, Churchills actions have denied Jordanians, Iraqis, Kurds and Palestinians anything resembling true democracy
and national stability.
The intractable Israeli-Palestinian conflict can also be traced directly back to Churchills door at number 10 Downing Street
and his decision to hand over the Promised Land to both Arabs and Jews. Churchill gave practical effect to the Balfour
declaration of 1917, which expressed Britains support for the creation of a Jewish homeland, resulting in the biggest single
error of British foreign policy in the Middle East.

Churchills legacy in Sub-Saharan Africa and Kenya in particular is also one of deep physical and physiological scars that
endure to this day.

Of greater consequence to truth and history should be a mans actions, not merely his words. Whilst Churchill has become
one of the most extensively quoted men in the English speaking world, particularly on issues of democracy and freedom,
true history speaks of a man whose actions revolved around, in Churchills own words, a lot of jolly little wars against
barbarous peoples.

One such war was when Kikuyu Kenyans rebelled for their freedom only to have Churchill call them brutish savage
children and force 150,000 of them into Britains Gulag.
Pulitzer-prize winning historian, Professor Caroline Elkins, highlights Churchills many crimes in Kenya in her book Britains
Gulag: The Brutal End of Empire in Kenya.

Professor Elkins explains how Churchills soldiers whipped, shot, burned, and mutilated Mau Mau suspects, all in the name
of British civilization. It is said that President Obamas grandfather Hussein Onyango Obama never truly recovered from
the torture he endured from Churchills men.

The Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen has proved how in Bengal in 1943 Churchill engineered one of the worst
famines in human history for profit.

Over three million civilians starved to death whilst Churchill refused to send food aid to India. Instead, Churchill trumpeted
that the famine was their own fault for breeding like rabbits.

Churchill intentionally hoarded grain to sell for profit on the open market after the Second World War instead of diverting it to
starving inhabitants of a nation controlled by Britain. Churchills actions in India unquestionably constituted a crime against
humanity.
Churchill was also one of the greatest advocates of Britains disastrous divide-and-rule foreign policy.

Churchills administration deliberately created and exacerbated sectarian fissures within Indias independence movement,
between Indian Hindus and Muslims that have had devastating effects on the region ever since.

Prior to Indias independence from Britain, Churchill was eager to see bloodshed erupt in India, so as to prove that Britain
was the benevolent glue holding the nation together. For Churchill, bloodshed also had the added strategic advantage that
it would also lead to the partition of India and Pakistan.

Churchills hope was this partition would result in Pakistan remaining within Britains sphere of influence. This, in turn, would
enable the Great Game against the Soviet empire to continue, no matter the cost to innocent Indian and Pakistanis. The
partition of India with Pakistan caused the death of about 2.5 million people and displaced some 12.5 million others.

According to writer, Ishaan Tharoor, Churchills own Secretary of State for India, Leopold Amery, compared his bosss
understanding of Indias problems to King George IIIs apathy for the Americas. In his private diaries Amery vented that on
the subject of India, Churchill is not quite sane and that he didnt see much difference between Churchills outlook and
Hitlers.
Churchill shared far more ideologically in common with Hitler than most British historians care to admit. For instance,
Churchill was a keen supporter of eugenics, something he shared in common with Germanys Nazi leadership, who were
estimated estimated to have killed 200,000 disabled people and forcibly sterilised twice that number.

Churchill drafted a highly controversial piece of legislation, which mandated that the mentally ill be forcibly sterilized. In a
memo to the Prime Minister in 1910, Winston Churchill cautioned, the multiplication of the feeble-minded is a very terrible
danger to the race.
He also helped organise the International Eugenics Conference of 1912, which was the largest meeting of proponents of
eugenics in history.

Churchill had a long standing belief in racial hierarchies and eugenics. In Churchills view, white protestant Christians were
at the very top of the pyramid, above white Catholics, while Jews and Indians were only slightly higher than Africans.

Historian, Mr. Hari, rightfully points out, the fact that we now live in a world where a free and independent India is a
superpower eclipsing Britain, and a grandson of the Kikuyu savages is the most powerful man in the world, is a repudiation
of Churchill at his ugliest and a sweet, ironic victory for Churchill at his best.
Amid todays Churchillian parades and celebratory speeches, British media and schoolbooks may choose to only remember
Churchills opposition to dictatorship in Europe, but the rest of the world cannot choose to forget Churchills imposition of
dictatorship on darker skinned people outside of Europe. Far from being the Lionheart of Britain, who stood on the ramparts
of civilisation, Winston Churchill, all too often, simply stood on the wrong side of history.

Churchill is indeed the Greatest Briton to have ever lived, because for decades, the myth of Churchill has served as
Britains greatest propaganda tool to bolster national white pride and glorify British imperial culture.

The Big Squeeze vs. Khazarian Mafia


January 22 2016 | From: Geopolitics

The result of the well-coordinated operation to cut-off the Khazarian Mafia from the rest of the
global economy is now undeniable.
The fiat FED dollar denominated economy is effectively shut down as indicated in the free-falling Baltic Dry Index.

Related: International Shipping Shuts Down; Baltic Dry Index Freefalling

We have warned that bank deposits are already being skimmed by the retreating parasites, and its prudent that necessary
preparations should have been made already.

Iran cannot be intimidated anymore. It has repelled Israel and Saudi Arabias big brother, i.e. the United States.

If your child is being held back and being denied even the possibility of entering a gifted program based on the fact that they
have attention issues, then there is problem.

Related: Captured US Navy Boats Were Carrying Top ISIS Leader, USS Truman Intervened

Again, we are featuring another summary of the information thats already been in this site and some new information
detailing the personalities involved that should facilitate the understanding of whats been going on for at least the last eight
years.
Big Squeeze Now On Khazarian Mafia

This article builds on past articles on this subject. For those who havent read those, reading this article is likely a waste of
time and it will be difficult to fit this information into their heads.

This is a long article and is written as a two-tiered piece. Those short of time can read the bold print and pass over the rest,
and then finish with the conclusion. Many thanks to my sources, some still living but most passed. None have been
associated with Veterans Today in any way. I do not enjoy writing this type of article for a number of reasons not appropriate
to be discussed here. But I do feel an obligation to get this information out. ]

Numerous nations around the World have now ganged up on the Khazarian Mafia (KM).

It is cornered and it is losing power by the day. Expect increased surveillance and harassment by local police who take
orders from Homeland Security (DHS) and receive their ridiculous conjured up Domestic Terror Watch Lists.

How much real power does the Khazarian Mafia have left and for how long can it hold out? Is the Khazarian Mafia still
powerful enough to start another major war in the Mideast, or even a nuclear WW3 to serve as a covering event for their
impending loss of World hegemony?

There are recent reports from China that the Chinese Government has ordered that its international cargo shipping in both
the Pacific and the Atlantic be restricted.

One source with connections to mainland Chinese sources has verified this claim that China has given an ultimatum that
there will be a big reduction in their cargo ships unloading any products until the USG begins to honor the Secret Reset
Agreement they entered into in 2013 during G-20 meetings.

Related: The Unfolding Global Reset that Only Few Understand

The Baltic Dry Shipping Index is way down, less than half of what it was at its peak. Crude oil has dropped to $30 a barrel or
less, and in Canada shale oil is even as low at $10 a barrel. American retail sales were low during Christmas and many
retail chains plan to close stores at multiple locations, including the notorious Walmart.

Related: International Shipping Shuts Down; Baltic Dry Index Freefalling

And oil derivatives of the big Wall Street Banks are under extreme stress due to these oil prices which has now placed
several of the largest in jeopardy. The US Petro Dollar is now under stress as never before and the massive continued
issuing and printing after the bailouts (repetitive Quantitative Easings, #7 and counting), the secret US Treasury Exchange
Stabilization Fund (ESF) direct foreign bank bailouts of trillions, and the secret direct USG Plunge Protection Team stock
purchases in mass no longer seem to mitigate this slide.
Several foreign nations have asked for their Gold back that has been stored at the Federal Reserve, but only a portion has
been shipped because the vaults are now apparently empty.

Chinese and Russian purchases of massive quantities of Gold and Silver are fact, not theory, giving them a huge advantage
as the Federal Reserve Systems Ponzi scheme approaches collapse.

Comex paper Gold which is supposed to be backed 100% by real Gold is not. This is just another part of the Federal
Reserve Systems massive Ponzi scheme which has probably already hit the iceberg and is taking on water.

The Khazarian Mafias top leadership is being squeezed and now seems cornered. They claim to each other to work directly
for Lucifer who they describe as their new rising god (they call this Lucifer Rising). Others in this small circle describe
Lucifer as a renegade Third Force who will cut these folks loose in a NY Minute as soon as they serve no useful purpose
anymore. And that is what now seems to be happening. Looks like their god is going to let them down. Oh well, should
they have expected less from pure evil?
When you dance with the devil, you are going to get burned. Thats the function of Doofus Cutouts that are propelled to the
top and given power, status and riches beyond imagination. They are there to serve as disposables when its all said and
done and they are no longer needed. They will never see it coming when they are abandoned and cut-loose.

If there is going to be new monetary system set up for the World and thats the way it looks, and it likely will not include the
Khazarian Mafia Kingpins.

As best we can determine before Chinese cargo shipping decreased, China was demanding that their Renminbi be included
in a basket of currencies.

And we know that the Renminbi will be backed by Gold and this basket of currencies will replace the current exclusiveness
of the US Petro Dollar which functions as the Worlds Reserve Currency.

This same source has claimed that the Japanese Government has just agreed to be part of the Chinese created Asian
Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB). If these reports are accurate then this means that Khazarian Mafia is being squeezed
economically.
For the G-20 nations and especially the USA to honor this Secret Reset Agreement made in 2013, the Khazarian Mafia
must be removed from its position controlling the Worlds Central Banking.

It also apparently requires the acceptance of the Chinese Renminbi based on Gold and Silver as a part of an international
basket of currencies and the removal of the US Petro Dollar as the Worlds Reserve Currency.

Looks like the Khazarian Mafia is now being squeezed from many directions. And it is rapidly losing control which makes it
desperate and dangerous.

When the Worlds largest Organized Crime Syndicate the Khazarian Mafia feels cornered one would expect that it would
become desperate to re-establish control and take even more drastic actions that it has in the past, unless too much force is
arrayed against them from more than one enemy.

And now for the first time numerous enemies have arisen against the Khazarian Mafia. And two of them are quite powerful.

The first and most powerful enemy appears to be the Russian Federation.
Putin and the Russian Federation have now completely checkmated the Khazarian Mafia both in the Ukraine and in Syria
and is now annihilating ISIS by deployment of its superior air power.

The second most powerful appears to be the American People, a very well-armed sleeping giant that is now rapidly
awaking.

This new exigent power of the American Masses is due to the Alternative Media of the Internet. The Internet has provided
incredible speed and the fact that so many Americans are finally figuring out everything out of our elected Politicians
mouths via the CMMM is their propaganda, big lies and false-narratives.

And the recent dire economy, and massive unemployment since 2008 brought about by all these traitorous Free Trade
Agreements and two illegal, unConstitutional Wall Street Bailouts have created a spontaneously emerging populism in the
American Masses.

This massive populism is not only unprecedented but it is now accompanied by a rising anger towards the DC doofus
career politicians and this new populism is increasingly powerful.

The Khazarian Mafia has deployed false-flag attacks all around the World and in America using Cutouts. Some were mass-
shootings in gun-free zones hyped in the Controlled Major Mass Media (CMMM), and others were major bombings like at
the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995 or the World Trade Center in NYC on 9-11-01.
The purpose is always to justify more power to central government in order to help the Khazarian Mafia protect itself and its
Evil Agenda.

But now that the Khazarian Mafia is being squeezed from all sides, will we see increased harassment of investigative
journalists, known truth tellers and dissidents who run counter to the Khazarian Mafias propaganda, big lies and false-
narratives they dispense through their CMMM?

Might we start seeing mysterious and increasingly frequent disappearances like what occurred in the South American Death
Squads? After all these Death Squads were all trained by the US Military and the CIA inside the USA, and these schools for
torture and murder are still active.

And recently Chicago was caught running a black site for DHS to disappear Targeted Individuals. Other cities have these
too. And the Pentagon and the CIA still run the Black Prison sites in East European nations and also have black prison ships
which are still active. Check this for more information.

We should expect the DHS to put out increasingly negative smear reports to the local Police Departments creating
increased fear of known truth tellers, dissidents, patriots and gun owners? This will include folks who have been illegally
placed on Domestic terror Watch lists with instructions to begin increased surveillance and harassment against them?

We now know for certain that the Khazarian Mafias actions in the past in America have included the Bombing of the Murrah
Building, first attempted bombing of the NYC Twin towers by the FBI setting up and supplying the Blind Sheikh. This was
actually an acoustics test to establish needs for the devices the Khazarian Mafia used in Twin Towers attack on 9-11-01.
And the FBI (with help of the CIA and crooked US Customs agents) placed a stolen barrel of cyanide stolen from Louis
Champons Natural Cherry Flavoring Company in Boca Raton Florida through a tunnel under the street by Wackemout
World Security.

This was done to see what the effects on folks near the blast in the basement parking ramp would be. Actually the blast
destroyed the toxicity of the cyanide.

Naturally the FBI tried to secretly and wrongly frame Louis Champon for this and only failed through the incredible detective
work of James Rothstein (NYCPD Gold Shield, police Intel and key part of the infamous NY State Crime Commission Secret
15 man Intel Task Force - now long retired for arresting Frank Sturgis aka Frank Fiorini in NYC for trying to terminate Marita
Lorenz right before her secret appearance at the HSCA and turning over of photos with Ruby, Sturgiss, Oswald at the motel
the night before the JFK Assassination and more).

Detective Rothstein, a German Catholic, is the only member of this secret 15 man task force who has survived (most were
terminated with extreme prejudice by the CIA) to suppress what they found out. Detective Rothstein is one of the greatest
American Heroes in Law Enforcement we have ever had anywhere in America.

His investigations led to more prosecutions of CIA pedophiles, their pedophile murders, and the CIA drug dealers than any
other LE person in the history of America and his record still stands.
None of this ever was allowed into the CMMM of course. Rothsteins astoundingly frank book is expected to be published
this year and it will be very interesting. His long term efforts to bring St. Johns Abbey to justice for the pedophile sheep-
dipped, rat-lined ex-Nazi priests that have been kept there and protected from prosecution are well known, and he is still at
it.

Too bad the local police are crooked, and the FBI continues to look the other way and do their usual assigned job, cover up
for the Process.

So this Worlds largest organized Crime Syndicate the Khazarian Mafia is truly capable of untold evil against the American
people as well as the whole World as long as it is allowed to exist and occupy and parasitize the USG for its own purposes.

Every large urban police dept. and the alphabets, especially the FBI has an Intel plant embedded there to run cover-ups for
the Process Satanic Cult and the CIA drug trafficking, both protected by being deputized as agents of National Security.

Inside America the Khazarian Mafia has controlled the Alphabets including the FBI, its main cover up agency and
entrapment/setup agency and the BATF, as well as the CIA; and they have always done a lot of the Khazarian Mafias illegal
dirty work.
And of course after the Khazarian Mafia attacked America on 9-11-01 to create a New Pearl Harbor event, they were now in
a position to establish Homeland Security (DHS) the foundation of the long planned American Police State.

This plan to establish DHS was already written and ready to push through Congress awaiting a major catalytic event such
as the major terrorist attack of 9-11-01 which was run by the Khazarian Mafia and its stateside assets deep inside the
Administration and the Pentagon.

The attack on America of 9-11-01 was designed to consolidate all American Law Enforcement under one central command
directly controlled by the Khazarian Mafia, a known foreign based power, and justify becoming a nation based on
preemptive wars of aggression.

The secret agenda of DHS is to transform America into a total surveillance society, a Police State rivaling East Germany
under the Stasi. That is why Marcus Wolfe (former head of the Stasi) was hired as a consultant to set up DHS two years
before he mysteriously died.

The ultimate end game here is for the Khazarian Mafia to use DHS to transform America into GAZA II, the Worlds largest
open-air prison camp and to make Americans the New Palestinians. This is all part of the Greater Israel Plan which is no
longer theory but established fact.
And the Greater Israel Plan is the cover story used by the Khazarian Mafias top leadership (aka the Select Few) to use
its Cutouts and main action agent the American-Israeli Israeli-first Dual Citizen Traitors and the Likudists in Israel to do
their dirty work.

The American Controlled Major Mass Media (CMMM) has been losing its credibility for years, and its popularity is at an all-
time low.

Since the CMMM is the main mouthpiece and propaganda/mind-kontrol agent for the Khazarian Mafia, its demise poses a
big loss of power for the Khazarian Mafia. And we now know for certain its demise is being engendered by the increasing
popularity of the Alternative News of the Internet.

The Khazarian Mafia is now cornered and you can bet that Homeland Security (DHS) is busy at work creating smear reports
at their fusion centers to send to local police with the instructions to increase the harassment of suspected domestic
terrorists.

Expect greatly increased surveillance and spying on all Americans even the Khazarian Mafias underling yes men and
women and major doofuses who have been appointed to high positions of power and to provide a twisted sort of inside
humor to the very top controllers that run the Khazarian Mafia System.

Spying and Intel collection has become remarkably advanced and will continue to increase in frequency, scope and
intrusiveness.
Much of it is used for banal entertainment by bored no longer give a damn NSA and NRO employees who dig watching
and listening to bedroom type scenes. The NSA and NRO are collecting far more raw data than they can adequately
process effectively, and it has become mostly a money-making means to asset strip more and more money from We The
People and make a big show of power by the Khazarian Mafia.

Some deep black and top secret technologies include; use of ones own AC house wiring, smart TVs, personal especially
laptop and handheld computers, cell phones, wired phones, remote phones, smart TVs and smart appliances; remote
outdoor to indoor thermometers and weather meters and stations for homeowners; some TV remote controls with voice
activation; really spooky new methods like driving by and shooting a special micro-transceiver nail in the siding that is
matched for color and texture; wall penetrating drive-by radar systems (also used along major highways in unmarked white
step vans and 18-wheelers; vehicle, aircraft, and satellite based special infrared sensors); high powered close-by receivers
for picking up brain waves and decoding thought and emotional states;
embedded transceiver chips in all cell phones ad auto GPS and blue-tooth communication and seek help systems which
can be remotely activated and easily traced and used a GPS tracking and used for microphones; orbital super HD electronic
day and night vision cameras than can sense an ant on the ground and many license plates; deep black variable and
synthetic aperture ground penetrating radar, advance gamma ray and neutron particle sensors and other even more secret
means involved ground, truck, tower and satellite antennas designed to pick up brainwave transmissions which have been
altered by ingested nano-particles in the atmospherically sprayed aerosol chem-trails and gasoline which include nano-
particles of aluminum and barium and other magnetic and electrical compounds which can be flashed, ided and used to
alter brainwave transmissions for external monitoring (referred to as the prime freak).

There are other even more advance psi-power means that are so far down the rabbit-hole they would be too discrediting to
discuss in this article. But they do exist and can be effective in many situations.

More on those in another article perhaps.

But even worse DHS uses the special deniable contractor squads and retired miltel, FBI and CIA to gang-stalk, do personal
surveillance, walk-bys, and moving in next door or as close as possible to key targeted individuals who are deemed as first
line threat to their system of lies.
Paranoid yet? Haha

And as if that wasnt enough, these special squads have specialists that deploy advanced psychotronic warfare against
USG, Intel, military and corporate whistle-blowers on behalf of the Khazarian Mafia kingpins that is designed to cause
chronic health problems, lethal medical disorders and suppression of thinking and acting.

Mark Novitsky

Some of these devices are cell tower activated, some by doppler weather radar, some closely custom placed transmitters
triangulated in from close-by spy cell and corporate proprietaries. For those that claim this is all pure fantasy and bs I can
strongly reply you are wrong, dead wrong. How can I say that?

Well I have personally swept Mark Novitskys residence with sensors used by the German Health Department and found it
way over the allowable European accepted limits with some equipment red-lined. Some sources inside the home were
disabled or removed, and we found strong external sources.

As we started tracing and triangulating their location of external transmissions, they were suddenly turned off preventing
location. Novitsky is as important in what he knows and has attempted to disclose as Snowden. 60 Minutes was going to do
a big story on him but backed out at the last minute because they said it had become too complicated.
Other top Federal and Intel whistle-blowers have told Novitsky what he knows about is above their pay grade. Most avoid
him like the plague. All his local Senators and Congresspersons were notified by Novitsky (evidence in writing I have seen)
and all deny it and did nothing, except for Governor Mark Dayton who was a Senator at the time.

Dayton has a good reputation with his staff and when terrorism struck in DC he immediately placed the safety of his staff
first. He did what he could for Novitsky and We The People but was stepped on hard.

Now Dayton is the Governor of Minnesota and appears to be doing his best to get the the states decaying infrastructure
repaired. Novitsky has been placed on the top secret DHS No Work under any Circumstances List by the FBI, which
follows him around and tells any employer where he applies that he is a Domestic Terrorist, please do not hire him, he is on
our Domestic Terror Watch List and under surveillance - you wouldnt want to be put on our Watch List now, would you?

The one good job Novitsky had in a non-Intel related area after leaving the Teletech Holdings related company he worked
for was ruined when the FBI showed up and delivered a National Security Letter (NSL) which his employer was allowed to
read but not keep, and which threatened a $10,000 fine and up to 10 years in a federal prison if he ever disclosed anything
about this NSL letter or why he was going to have to separate Novitsky.

And Mark has had strange but very real recent medical problems and his first doctors were either dirty, Khazarian Mafia
worker bees, Sayanims or just plain uncaring and medically lousy.

The lab was either dirty or had folks inside that tampered with his blood work. Finally, he was able to find a top physician
who is 100% ethical with a top academic reputation and will not kowtow to illegal government manipulations.
And who are DHSs listed domestic terrorists? Gun owners, Ron Paul supporters, Veterans, libertarians, Christians,
Islamics, Patriots, anti-war activists, dissidents and alternative media reporters and journalists and many many more
individuals and groups that can be placed on the list by any supervisory agent after even one complaint of any kind and
these watch lists have no oversight or appeal process. Once you are on these Watch Lists you are doomed to be on forever.

Even Senator Ted Kennedy was put on the No Fly List by mistake and despite expensive legal efforts and big political
muscle he could never get off of it. Why you wonder?

Because these Terror Watch lists are creations of the Khazarian Mafia Kingpins. They are visible indicators of their
unbridled twisted, sick, evil power produced by their infiltration and hijacking of America through their private pernicious
usury debt-note private Fiat counterfeit Ponzi-type central banking system.

We may see increased harassment and abuse of phony domestic terror watch lists.

We may see increased harassment by local police, alphabets as ordered by DHS, according to their whacked out watch
lists that include almost everyone but the real domestic terrorists who are the Khazarian Mafia leaders and the top officials
of DHS, whose job is to terrorize Americans into subservience and compliance and take away all our Constitutional Rights.
On the other hand, we may see such a rapid loss of functional day to day power by the Khazarian Mafia and their police
state mechanism, DHS, that we do not see a big increase in surveillance and harassment. Maybe we will even see less now
that the Khazarian Mafia is cornered and being pressed from all sides by the World and by We The People.

The confidential domestic terror Watch Lists lists were personally prepared under the watchful direction of Janet
Napolitano while she was head of DHS.

These were leaked and published on the Internet by DHS insiders who thought she and DHS was a joke but wanted to keep
their pay and benefits, so we know for certain they exist and what is on them. Even though she resigned her position at
DHS, she is being sued by subordinate men for sexual harassment and for moving their office into the mens lavatory,
among other things.

A couple of nights ago while driving at night in the early evening, I was pulled over and needlessly rousted by a local police
Officer, who claimed I crossed over the line three times on a stretch of road with no other traffic close by.
This fine very young lady police officer tailed me for a couple miles and then pulled me over. I dont drink, use drugs, speed
or drive carelessly, nor did I did not cross over any lines.

After the usual license and insurance check, the Officer let me go with no ticket. But she asked me a question about
something irrelevant that could she have only known about from information gained by a local stingray tap or from the local
DHS Fusion Center. Not very professional. She was rousting me, and it was a message that I received and am now
responding to.

A Deal with the Devil at Langley?

In this same Department some years back, the prior Police Chief was provided a free trip to Langley for a special meeting.
During that meeting, he was asked by the CIA to sign a secret Jurisdictional Agreement on behalf of his Department in
which he agreed to submit jurisdiction on any case to the Feds that they requested.
Major amounts of military grade equipment was to be provided in exchange, including two armored cars, grenade launchers,
full-auto real assault rifles and machine guns, body armor, bullet proof barriers and lots of military grade ammo.

The Chief was an honorable man with integrity and refused to sign the agreement. Did he develop a strange neurological
condition soon after that and have to resign?

Did the CIA keep secretly working with a couple corrupt officers to distribute illegal drugs to high school kids from DEA
controlled deliveries, a local smaller feeder airport through a seafood import proprietary, with a local drug task force (with
special license plates to identify each other) either looking the other way or involved. Betcha this hasnt stopped.
The department got a new Chief and now has the equipment offered. You can be sure that this secret transaction has
already been successfully made in almost every large Urban Police Department. So far, a significant number of Sheriffs
offices have refused. The County Sheriff is the supreme law enforcement officer in any county and has authority even over
the Feds.

Be clear about this, these deals with the Devil at Langley to get jurisdiction over your local police are all driven by the
Khazarian Mafia Kingpins who are Neo-Bolsheviks who plan to use DHS and our local Police to terrorize us, tyrannize us,
completely asset strip us and then mass-murder us.
Supposedly all these 1033 Program military equipment transfers for the big stuff have been stopped. Dont believe it, that
is mere propaganda, and the only big stuff going back is for updated electronic warfare systems, new advanced weaponry
or for repair and major maintenance.

For now until the Khazarian Mafias back is broken, expect increased surveillance and harassment by local police if you are
in one of the categories on their watch lists (which is about half of the American people).

This is the kind of surveillance and increased harassment Gun owners, Ron Paul supporters, Veterans, libertarians,
Christians, Islamics, Patriots, anti-war activists, dissidents and alternative media reporters and journalists can expect more
of as the Khazarian Mafias power is choked off by the whole World that is now ganging up on it.
DHS is here to militarize the American Police and turn America into a Neo-Bolshevik Stasi-style Police State and transform it
into GAZA II with all Americans the New Palestinians. Once that is accomplished the Khazarian Mafia plans to treat
Americans the same way Bolsheviks treated innocent Russian civilians.

It raped, tortured and mass murdered 100 million of them. The Khazarian Mafia is Neo-Bolshevik and its top Policy-Makers
are from the same age old bloodlines. They have recorded their intentions in stone at the Georgia Guidestones so we know
this for certain.

But heres the deal. America is not Russia in 1917 and is the most armed up populace in the World. Despite all the recent
efforts of the Khazarian Mafia to force our so-called elected politicians to disarm Americans, it will never happen.
Americans have been buying guns at an increasing rate ever since the Khazarian Mafia deployed all these mass-shootings
in gun free zones and major efforts to grab our guns began in earnest.

Of course, most County Sheriffs in America are populist oriented and part of their local communities and elected because of
the respect they have gained and maintained. But even large urban police are starting to wake up.
They have a dangerous enough job already thanks to the CIA drug trafficking into urban cities for black ops money and
theirs and the BATFs continuing gun sales to gangs, especially MS 13 and the Las Zetas who were trained by the US
Military inside the USA.

Most American urban police officers have no intention of going door to door to fulfill some crazy unConstitutional
Presidential PDD or even a new Congressional law passed. They do not want to turn honest law-abiding American Gun-
owners, hunters and Veterans into a Solzenitzen-type spontaneously erupting vigilante counter-force that shoots with bigger
bore, more accurate, longer reaching rifles than they can.

Most police officers want to go home to their families at the end of the day, and they know that the anger of the average
American is now growing against the out of control militarized swat teams that attack the wrong homes and often kill and
maim innocent women and young children.

Smart Officers and chiefs want to establish good community relations and be seen as the community as helpers and public
servants, not their oppressors working for the ADL and DHS. By the way, most large urban police departments are trained
by the ADL to view the average civilian as real or potential domestic terrorists, especially gun owners.

Now because of the recent public concern for increased mass-shootings and terrorism, many police are changing their
minds on gun control and actually favor conceal-carry by law abiding citizens who have met the standards and have proper
training.
Too many Chiefs of big urban departments are given free junkets to Israel for such training, and while there are served
some very special Koolaide in their drinks and given some sophisticated psychotronic mind-kontrol indoctrination training.

Take the recent case when a dumb swat team broke in the wrong home with no proper warrant and threw a stun grenade
into a babys crib, burning and blowing off part of the young childs face. Or the many cases where the wrong homes are
stormed by out of control savage swat looking for a few $10 rocks, and innocent life is criminally taken in an instant.

Or all the illegal, unConstitutional seizures of cash and autos from innocent non-drug dealers, taken and placed into police
and Federal coffers often into the private pockets of corrupt supervisors and chiefs and judges.

Related: Censorship Shock: Amazon.com Bans Investigative Book Nobody Died At Sandy Hook

And many Americans are starting to catch on to the fact that some of these mass-shootings in gun-free zones are real with
real dead victims, while others like Sandy Hook are faked.
But that all are engineered, staged false-flag attacks on the Second Amendment. This has kept folks confused up until now,
but thanks to the efforts of hundreds of tireless researchers the truth is now being published all over the Internet and is now
readily available for all.

Conclusion:

One thing is certain, the Khazarian Mafia is now cornered and its hegemony is rapidly being eroded. Its false-flag efforts to
disarm Americans and any other efforts to do so will fail.

The Khazarian Mafia is now doomed by the whole World which is building massive financial firewalls against it and ganging-
up on it. The Khazarian Mafia is being deconstructed bit by bit and you can expect they will have a hard landing and
because they are such two-faced psychopaths, they will keep lying and murdering until the end.

Undoubtedly the Big Squeeze is now on the Khazarian Mafia, they are cornered and increasingly desperate and their private
Fiat pernicious usury debt-based counterfeit money system has become a Ponzi scheme nearing collapse.

And the BRICS System is just one of many new financial firewalls being built up against the Khazarian Mafias financial
hegemony which is now destined to fail.

There are certain factions in the Pentagon and American Intel which have so far been strong enough to place strong limits
on what the Khazarian Mafia can do to retaliate, and they have been blocked from starting a nuclear WW3 with Russia as
intended.

Efforts by Senator John McCain and other Traitors like the retired General commanding ISIS have also failed.

And all their recent efforts to attack Russia through Crimea and to destroy Syria and Iran have also failed because of the
new military power and technological supremacy of the Russian Federation under the dynamic leadership of President
Putin.
If these reports are true that China is severely restricting their container shipping companies until the Khazarian Mafia
honors the Secret Reset Agreement, this is indeed a very interesting development. And if true it suggests that all the hype in
the CMMM that Chinas economy is worse than ours is likely exaggerated.

A better guess is that China has prepared for this for quite a while and is no longer so dependent on American sales,
perhaps already having established some lucrative new markets with Russia, South America, Malaysia and other trading
partners. Is this part of a major economic trap for the Khazarian Mafia and its US Petro Dollar? In time we shall find out, and
it make not take too long.

Declassified Emails Reveal NATO Killed Gaddafi To Stop Libyan Creation Of Gold-
Backed Currency
January 18 2016 | From: ActivistPost

In spite of French-led U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973 creating a no-fly zone over Libya with
the express intent of protecting civilians, one of the over 3,000 new Hillary Clinton emails
released by the State Department on New Years Eve, contain damning evidence of Western
nations using NATO as a tool to topple Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi.
The NATO overthrow was not for the protection of the people, but instead it was to thwart Gaddafis attempt to
create a gold-backed African currency to compete with the Western central banking monopoly.

The emails indicate the French-led NATO military initiative in Libya was also driven by a desire to gain access to a greater
share of Libyan oil production, and to undermine a long term plan by Gaddafi to supplant France as the dominant power in
the Francophone Africa region.
The April 2011 email, sent to the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by unofficial adviser and longtime Clinton confidante
Sidney Blumenthal with the subject line Frances client and Qaddafis gold, reveals predatory Western intentions.

The Foreign Policy Journal reports:

The email identifies French President Nicholas Sarkozy as leading the attack on Libya with five specific purposes
in mind: to obtain Libyan oil, ensure French influence in the region, increase Sarkozys reputation domestically,
assert French military power, and to prevent Gaddafis influence in what is considered Francophone Africa.

Most astounding is the lengthy section delineating the huge threat that Gaddafis gold and silver reserves,
estimated at 143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver, posed to the French franc (CFA) circulating as a
prime African currency."

The email makes clear that intelligence sources indicate the impetus behind the French attack on Libya was a calculated
move to consolidate greater power, using NATO as a tool for imperialist conquest, not a humanitarian intervention as the
public was falsely led to believe.

According to the email:

This gold was accumulated prior to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African
currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan was designed to provide the Francophone African Countries
with an alternative to the French franc (CFA).

(Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued at more than
$7 billion. French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was
one of the factors that influenced President Nicolas Sarkozys decision to commit France to the attack on Libya.)"
The email provides a peek behind the curtain to reveal how foreign policy is often carried out in practice. While reported in
the media that the Western-backed Libyan military intervention is necessary to save human lives, the real driving factor
behind the intervention was shown to be the fact that Gaddafi planned to create a high degree of economic independence
with a new pan-African currency, which would lessen French influence and power in the region.

The evidence indicates that when French intelligence became aware of the Libyan initiative to create a currency to compete
with the Western central banking system, the decision to subvert the plan through military means began, ultimately including
the NATO alliance.

Shocker: Hillary Email Blows Cover Off Massive Obama Plot To Promote Terrorism
January 14 2016 | From: BeforeItsNews

What a crazy election season its been so far, and we are not even a quarter of the way through the
first round yet.
Expect what you once considered unthinkable as an American to become the ordinary, as the campaigns on
both sides continue to progress. Allow me to explain why the news about Barack and Hillarys plot to promote
terrorism should not come as a surprise to anyone.

In addition to all the allegations being levied against the President in a Drafted Resolution Consisting of 48 Separate
Criminal Charges Drafted For Obamas Impeachment, it should have been obvious to everyone a over a week ago when
the news originally broke that Obama Defied a Judges Order and Covered For Clinton. This act alone should have landed
him in the slammer, especially since it is the third time Obama has defied a judges order.

It is significantly important that we fully understand why Obama is covering for Hillary. It is my belief that you
would have to trace the Hillary email and personal server story all the way back to its origins.

It has been reported that within Washingtons inner circles it is well known that the devastating leaks about Clintons server
came from none other than Valerie Jarrett. That means you KNOW the leaks were done with the full knowledge and
approval of Barack Obama.

Ask yourself something. Why on earth would Obama be leaking devastating information about the only viable Democrat
candidate running? What could he POSSIBLY gain from that, because there is no way Bernie Sanders will win the
presidency.

That means one of two scenarios would play out. Most people would agree it is likely the House and Senate will remain
under GOP control. So, by sinking Hillary, Obama is either:

1. Perfectly willing to let a Republican president succeed him, and watch his presidency and his
lifes work unwind almost within hours of his replacement taking office.

Think about it: Obamas executive orders could be undone with the stroke of a pen, and the first day Congress is in session,
the new president will have a bill to repeal Obamacare on their desk. When has Mr. Ill just go around Congress EVER let
something go, let alone his lifes work?
Furthermore, it CANNOT be forgotten that it was Obama himself who has personally put Hillary in this position with the leaks
in the first place. So, were supposed to believe Obama would sabotage his own lifes work on purpose? PLEASE!

OR

2.Sinking Hillary is Proof Obama Has No Plans of Leaving Office, and His Third Term Is Unfolding
Right Before Us. People say thats not possible. Why not? Obama cant do that because its not
legal?

Uh, when has that stopped him before? Neither is going around Congress. Furthermore, when has ANYONE, Republican
or Democrat, EVER stood up to this president and seriously tried to stop him before? EXACTLY! Have you stopped and
asked yourself why the<Pentagon Says They Are Preparing For Huge Civil Unrest in the U.S.?

Civil unrest? Over what? What do they know that we dont? It might be time for you to think about these things.
At this point, it has been reported that everyone from Obamas OWN APPOINTEE for Director of the Defense
Intelligence Agency, General Michael Flynn, to Four Star Navy Admiral Lyons, Lieutenant General
ThomasMcInerney, Former a CIA Director James Woolsey, and Former FBI assistant director James Kallstrom, have
all gone on record either directly accusing Obama of treason or implying as much, and then tomorrow the RNC votes on
whether to take up Resolution Drafted For Obamas Impeachment Consisting of 48 Separate Criminal Charges.

So, tell me, if Obama wasnt up to something horrible, why else would he be taking out Hillary, UNLESS he has a backup
plan already in place!

Keeping all that in mind, up until Obama Defied a Judges Order Last Week, and Covered For Clinton, it seemed pretty
obvious which direction things were heading. Why the sudden about face.
As the author of that article points out, after leaking all this information and getting Hillary in THIS much hot water, what
reason could Obama possibly have to reverse course and cover for her now?

Simply put, the author suggests;

The answer is becoming increasingly clear: whats on that hard drive could possibly take down both Clinton and
Obama, and it has to be sanitized and obfuscated before its released to the courts.

And there you have it. Barack and Hillary are both very bad actors, and are both unfit for Presidential Office!

The Right Scoop Writes:

The Free Beacon caught a pretty remarkable email that went to Hillary and recommended that she sparked fake protests
among Palestinians in order to pressure Israel:

Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton considered a secret plan created by her then-advisers to foment unrest
among Palestinian citizens and spark protests in order to push the Israeli government back to the negotiating table,
according to emails released as part of the investigation into the Democratic presidential frontrunners private email
server.

In a Dec, 18, 2011, email, former U.S. ambassador to Israel Thomas Pickering suggested that Clinton consider a
plan to restart then-stalled peace negotiations by kickstarting Palestinian demonstrations against Israel.

Pickering described the effort as a potential game changer in the region, recommending that the United States
undertake a clandestine campaign to generate unrest. Clinton requested that his email be printed.
What will change the situation is a major effort to use non-violent protests and demonstrations to put peace back in
the center of peoples aspirations as well as their thoughts, and use that to influence the political
leadership, Pickering wrote.

This is far from a sure thing, but far, in my humble view, from hopeless, he continued. Women can and ought to
be at the center of these demonstrations. Many men and others will denigrate the idea. I dont and I dont think that
was your message.

Palestinian women, he noted, are less likely than men to resort to violence.

It must be all and only women. Why? On the Palestinian side the male culture is to use force, Pickering wrote,
comparing the effort to the protests in Egypt that deposed former leader Hosni Mubarak.

Palestinian men will not for long patiently demonstrate - they will be inclined over time and much too soon to be
frustrated and use force. Their male culture comes close to requiring it.

Hillary simply asks for the email to be printed, but doesnt say anything about it via electronic correspondence.

So this begs the question of what OTHER unrest the State Department might be sparking in order to pressure others to do
Hillarys will.

Ed Morrissey at Hot Air adds more interesting but frightening possible consequences to this email:

Gee, I wonder how many other foreign protests were facilitated by the State Department? Were any others
sparked against American allies in that region?

One has to wonder after reading this how much the State Department might have had to do with some of the Arab
Spring protests, too. (In fact, at one point Pickering says that the effort must be just like Tahrir Square, a mention
that might interest our allies in Egypt.)

This e-mail thread doesnt indicate whether Hillary took Pickerings advice, but she certainly appeared to take it
under advisement. And while the e-mail itself wasnt classified, its yet another example of how these kinds of
communications can harm American interests when transmitted in the open.

This would be enough to create a massive backlash among our allies, and in fact may still do so."

Consider one mystery in light of this new information why was Hillary so insistent the attack on Benghazi wasnt
coordinated, but just some guys walking down the street who decided itd be a good time to kill some Americans?

Now how long will it take for the left-loving media to actually get of their Obamas and ask Hillary about this? Dont hold your
breath.

New Hillary Emails Reveal Propaganda, Executions, Coveting Libyan Oil And Gold
January 13 2016 | From: LevantReport

Throughout the Libyan War there were widespread reports of field executions and torture of black
Libyans carried out by militias aligned with the National Transition Council (some NTC aligned
fighters shown below.
Comment: The important point this article raises is that any country that attempts to implement a gold / physical
asset - backed (i.e. NOT a FIAT) based currency is summarily attacked by the United States under the guise of
some manufactured bullshit threat.

This is because the cabal can only keep control of the world by having their FIAT currency system employed in
every country.

Related: The Truth Of Libya & Gaddafi: What NATO Really Did

New Emails Expose Hillarys Dirty War in Libya

The New Years Eve release of over 3000 new Hillary Clinton emails from the State Department has CNN abuzz over
gossipy text messages, the who gets to ride with Hillary selection process set up by her staff, and how a cute Hillary
photo fared on Facebook.
But historians of the 2011 NATO war in Libya will be sure to notice a few of the truly explosive confirmations contained in
the new emails: admissions of rebel war crimes, special ops trainers inside Libya from nearly the start of protests, Al Qaeda
embedded in the U.S. backed opposition, Western nations jockeying for access to Libyan oil, the nefarious origins of the
absurd Viagra mass rape claim, and concern over Gaddafis gold and silver reserves threatening European currency.

Hillarys Death Squads

A March 27, 2011 intelligence brief on Libya, sent by long time close adviser to the Clintons and Hillarys unofficial
intelligence gatherer, Sidney Blumenthal, contains clear evidence of war crimes on the part of NATO-backed rebels. Citing
a rebel commander source speaking in strict confidence Blumenthal reports to Hillary [emphasis mine]:

Under attack from allied Air and Naval forces, the Libyan Army troops have begun to desert to the rebel side in
increasing numbers. The rebels are making an effort to greet these troops as fellow Libyans, in an effort to
encourage additional defections.

(Source Comment: Speaking in strict confidence, one rebel commander stated that his troops continue to
summarily execute all foreign mercenaries captured in the fighting).

While the illegality of extra-judicial killings is easy to recognize (groups engaged in such are conventionally termed death
squads), the sinister reality behind the foreign mercenaries reference might not be as immediately evident to most.

While over the decades Gaddafi was known to make use of European and other international security and infrastructural
contractors, there is no evidence to suggest that these were targeted by the Libyan rebels.
There is however, ample documentation by journalists, academics, and human rights groups demonstrating that black
Libyan civilians and sub-Saharan contract workers, a population favored by Gaddafi in his pro-African Union policies, were
targets of racial cleansing by rebels who saw black Libyans as tied closely with the regime.[1]

Black Libyans were commonly branded as foreign mercenaries by the rebel opposition for their perceived general loyalty to
Gaddafi as a community and subjected to torture, executions, and their towns liberated by ethnic cleansing. This is
demonstrated in the most well-documented example of Tawergha, an entire town of 30,000 black and dark-skinned
Libyans which vanished by August 2011 after its takeover by NATO-backed NTC Misratan brigades.

These attacks were well-known as late as 2012 and often filmed, as this report from The Telegraph confirms:

After Muammar Gaddafi was killed, hundreds of migrant workers from neighboring states were imprisoned by
fighters allied to the new interim authorities. They accuse the black Africans of having been mercenaries for the
late ruler. Thousands of sub-Saharan Africans have been rounded up since Gaddafi fell in August."

It appears that Clinton was getting personally briefed on the battlefield crimes of her beloved anti-Gaddafi fighters long
before some of the worst of these genocidal crimes took place.

Al-Qaeda and Western Special Forces Inside Libya

The same intelligence email from Sydney Blumenthal also confirms what has become a well known theme of Western
supported insurgencies in the Middle East: the contradiction of special forces training militias that are simultaneously
suspected of links to Al Qaeda.
Blumenthal relates that an extremely sensitive source confirmed that British, French, and Egyptian special operations units
were training Libyan militants along the Egyptian-Libyan border, as well as in Benghazi suburbs.

While analysts have long speculated as to the when and where of Western ground troop presence in the Libyan War, this
email serves as definitive proof that special forces were on the ground only within a month of the earliest protests which
broke out in the middle to end of February 2011 in Benghazi.
By March 27 of what was commonly assumed a simple popular uprising external special operatives were already
overseeing the transfer of weapons and supplies to the rebels including a seemingly endless supply of AK47 assault rifles
and ammunition.

Yet only a few paragraphs after this admission, caution is voiced about the very militias these Western special forces were
training because of concern that, radical/terrorist groups such as the Libyan Fighting Groups and Al Qaida in the Islamic
Maghreb (AQIM) are infiltrating the NLC and its military command.

The Threat of Libyas Oil and Gold to French Interests

Though the French-proposed U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973 claimed the no-fly zone implemented over Libya was to
protect civilians, an April 2011 email sent to Hillary with the subject line Frances client and Qaddafis gold tells of less
noble ambitions.
The email identifies French President Nicholas Sarkozy as leading the attack on Libya with five specific purposes in mind:

To obtain Libyan oil, ensure French influence in the region, increase Sarkozys reputation domestically, assert
French military power, and to prevent Gaddafis influence in what is considered Francophone Africa.

Most astounding is the lengthy section delineating the huge threat that Gaddafis gold and silver reserves, estimated at 143
tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver, posed to the French franc (CFA) circulating as a prime African currency. In
place of the noble sounding Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine fed to the public, there is this confidential
explanation of what was really driving the war [emphasis mine]:

This gold was accumulated prior to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African
currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan was designed to provide the Francophone African Countries
with an alternative to the French franc (CFA).

(Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued at more than
$7 billion. French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was
one of the factors that influenced President Nicolas Sarkozys decision to commit France to the attack on
Libya.)"

Though this internal email aims to summarize the motivating factors driving Frances (and by implication NATOs)
intervention in Libya, it is interesting to note that saving civilian lives is conspicuously absent from the briefing.
Instead, the great fear reported is that Libya might lead North Africa into a high degree of economic independence with a
new pan-African currency.

French intelligence discovered a Libyan initiative to freely compete with European currency through a local alternative, and
this had to be subverted through military aggression.

The Ease of Floating Crude Propaganda

Early in the Libyan conflict Secretary of State Clinton formally accused Gaddafi and his army of using mass rape as a tool of
war. Though numerous international organizations, like Amnesty International, quickly debunked these claims, the charges
were uncritically echoed by Western politicians and major media.

It seemed no matter how bizarre the conspiracy theory, as long as it painted Gaddafi and his supporters as monsters, and
so long as it served the cause of prolonged military action in Libya, it was deemed credible by network news.
Two foremost examples are referenced in the latest batch of emails:

The sensational claim that Gaddafi issued Viagra to his troops for mass rape, and the claim that bodies were staged by the
Libyan government at NATO bombing sites to give the appearance of the Western coalition bombing civilians.

In a late March 2011 email, Blumenthal confesses to Hillary that,

I communicated more than a week ago on this storyQaddafi placing bodies to create PR stunts about supposed
civilian casualties as a result of Allied bombingthough underlining it was a rumor. But now, as you know, Robert
Gates gives credence to it. (See story below.)

Sources now say, again rumor (that is, this information comes from the rebel side and is unconfirmed
independently by Western intelligence), that Qaddafi has adopted a rape policy and has even distributed Viagra to
troops. The incident at the Tripoli press conference involving a woman claiming to be raped is likely to be part of a
much larger outrage. Will seek further confirmation."

Not only did Defense Secretary Robert Gates promote his bizarre staged bodies theory on CBS News Face The Nation,
but the even stranger Viagra rape fiction made international headlines as U.S. Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice made a
formal charge against Libya in front of the UN Security Council.

What this new email confirms is that not only was the State Department aware of the spurious nature of what Blumenthal
calls rumors originating solely with the rebels, but did nothing to stop false information from rising to top officials who then
gave them credence.
It appears, furthermore, that the Viagra mass rape hoax likely originated with Sidney Blumenthal himself.

[1] The most comprehensive and well-documented study of the plight of black Libyans is contained in Slouching Towards
Sirte: NATOs War on Libya and Africa (publ. 2012, Baraka Books) by Maximilian Forte, Professor Anthropology and
Sociology at Concordia University in Montral, Qubec.

Related: Afghan Ghost Soldiers: Just One of Many War on Terror Scams

The Proof Is In: The US Government Is The Most Complete Criminal Organization In
Human History
January 12 2016 | From: Infowars

Washington asserts the power of US courts over foreign nationals and claims extra-territorial
jurisdiction of US courts over foreign activities
Unique among the countries on earth, the US government insists that its laws and dictates take precedence over
the sovereignty of nations.

Washington asserts the power of US courts over foreign nationals and claims extra-territorial jurisdiction of US courts over
foreign activities of which Washington or American interest groups disapprove. Perhaps the worst results of Washingtons
disregard for the sovereignty of countries is the power Washington has exercised over foreign nationals solely on the basis
of terrorism charges devoid of any evidence.

Consider a few examples. Washington first forced the Swiss government to violate its own banking laws. Then Washington
forced Switzerland to repeal its bank secrecy laws. Allegedly, Switzerland is a democracy, but the countrys laws are
determined in Washington by people not elected by the Swiss to represent them.
Consider the soccer scandal that Washington concocted, apparently for the purpose of embarrassing Russia. The soccer
organizations home is Switzerland, but this did not stop Washington from sending FBI agents into Switzerland to arrest
Swiss citizens. Try to imagine Switzerland sending Swiss federal agents into the US to arrest Americans.

Consider the $9 billion fine that Washington imposed on a French bank for failure to fully comply with Washingtons
sanctions against Iran.

This assertion of Washingtons control over a foreign financial institution is even more audaciously illegal in view of the fact
that the sanctions Washington imposed on Iran and requires other sovereign countries to obey are themselves strictly
illegal. Indeed, in this case we have a case of triple illegality as the sanctions were imposed on the basis of concocted and
fabricated charges that were lies.

Or consider that Washington asserted its authority over the contract between a French shipbuilder and the Russian
government and forced the French company to violate a contract at the expense of billions of dollars to the French company
and a large number of jobs to the French economy. This was a part of Washington teaching the Russians a lesson for not
following Washingtons orders in Crimea.
Try to imagine a world in which every country asserted the extra-territoriality of its law. The planet would be in permanent
chaos with world GDP expended in legal and military battles.

Neoconned Washington claims that as History chose America to exercise its hegemony over the world, no other law is
relevant. Only Washingtons will counts. Law itself is not even needed as Washington often substitutes orders for laws as
when Richard Armitage, Deputy Secretary of State (an unelected position) told the President of Pakistan to do as he is told
or we will bomb you into the stone age.

Try to image the Presidents of Russia or China giving such an order to a soverign nation.

In fact, Washington did bomb large areas of Pakistan, murdering thousands of women, children, and village elders.
Washingtons justification was the assertion of the extra-territoriality of US military actions in other countries with which
Washington is not at war.
As horrendous as all of this is, the worst of Washingtons crimes against other peoples is when Washington kidnaps citizens
of other countries and renditions them to Guantanamo in Cuba or to secret dungeons in criminal states such as Egypt and
Poland to be held and tortured in violation both of US law and international law. These egregious crimes prove beyond any
doubt that the US government is the worst criminal enterprise that has ever existed on Earth.

When the criminal neoconservative George W. Bush regime launched its illegal invasion of Afghanistan, the criminal regime
in Washington desperately needed terrorists in order to provide a justification for an illegal invasion that constitutes a war
crime under international law.

However, there were not any terrorists.

So Washington dropped leaflets over warlord territories offering thousands in dollars in bounty money for terrorists.

The warlords responded to the opportunity and captured every unprotected person and sold them to the Americans for the
bounty.

The only evidence that the terrorists were terrorists is that the innocent people were sold to the Americans by warlords as
terrorists.

Yesterday Fayez Mohammed Ahmed Al-Kandari was released after 14 years of torture by freedom and democracy
America.

The United States military officer, Col. Barry Wingard, who represented Al-Kandari said that:

There simply is no evidence other than he is a Muslim in Afghanistan at the wrong time, other than double and
triple hearsay statements, something I have never seen as justification for incarceration.

Much less, said Col. Wingard, was there cause for a litany of multi-year torture in an effort to force a confession to the
alleged offenses.

Do not expect the Western prostitute media to report these facts to you. To find out, you must go to RT or to Stephen
Lendman or here to this site.
The presstitute Western media are part of Washingtons criminal operation.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street
Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many
university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His latest book, The Failure of Laissez
Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is now available.

Empire Files With Abby Martin Launches First Show: America's Occupation Of The
World
January 6 2016 | From: TheRealNews

Abby Martin debuts teleSUR's The Empire Files exploring the U.S. Empire and its rise to world
hegemony.
teleSUR's The Empire Files airs every Friday night at 9:00 pm EST / 6:00 PST. Watch live here.

Comment: Of course, the 'American occupation' is really just the front used by the Khazarian - Nazi - Zionists that have been
running the show for so long. They hide behind America as a front, as they do with Judaism. The vast majority of Americans
and Jews are good people who want nothing to do with the evil machinations of the 'Illuminati' psychopaths.
Major Disclosures Are Seeds For A Global Revolution
January 5 2016 | From: Geopolitics

Just for 2015 alone, there were at least three major disclosures being made. From the actual killers
of Princes Diana, to the 911 WTC controlled demolition, and the definitive Hitler Vatican Ratline
Escape to Argentina via History Channel.

These major disclosures are not meant to entertain its audience, but the producers of these information are doing
great effort and expending great amount of resources hoping to wake up as many people as possible to the
madness perpetrated against them by the Oligarchical Elite.

Most importantly, the people casting these documentaries are risking their lives just to bring the Whole Truth to the
mainstream consciousness. They are all planting the seeds for a global revolution.

The purported speech by Vladimir Putin to defeat the Illuminati was a cordial invitation for us to join in. Recall, it was the
Russians who hoisted their national flag first in Berlin during WW2 to declare the defeat of the Nazis, or so they believe.

Are we going to see them do a rerun from our couches once again?

The ongoing massive disclosures were formally inaugurated last May 2001 at the National Press Club Conference on the
Disclosure Project.

Since then, other disclosure events followed.


Related: History Channel - Ancient Aliens

Hunting Hitler

Related: FBI Document Confirms Hitler Fled To Argentina In 1945

Our earlier information was that Hitler survived through the war in 1945 and fled to Juan Perons Argentina.

That information came from Hitlers own bodyguard, Otto Skorzeny, who said in a deathbed confession that they fled Berlin
through a five-seater unmarked airplane which would tie up pretty nicely to History Channels epic documentary, Hunting
Hitler, that is based on the FBIs Hitler disclosure back in 2014.
Related: FBI Doc Confirms Hitler Fled to Argentina in 1945

Among the highlights of the said documentary are direct first-hand witnesses to seeing Hitler inside a Spanish convent after
being flown into the country through a small German plane with 4 other passengers.
The Vatican Ratline did serve the Nazis so well, as tens of thousands of them have effectively assimilated themselves into
the American society barely 2 years after the Second World War ended.

The Hunting Hitler on location documentary is still running as of this writing and you can watch all broadcasted episodes so
far from the link below.

Related: Hunting Hitler

Another disclosure that hit the mainstream newspaper last year is the revelation of the Windsor queen sporting her snappy
Nazi salute

Related: Video of Queen Liz in Snappy Nazi Salute Exposed on MSM

In addition to a damning documentary by Keith Allen detailing the last few minutes of Princess Diana and subsequent
assassination cover up that followed.

Unlawful Killing The Film The British Wont Get To See | Keith Allen

My documentary about the Diana inquest will be shown everywhere but the UK. Heres why.

The internet is a global lavatory wall, a Rabelaisian mixture of truth, lies, insanity and humour. I felt its power and madness
this week, when an excerpt from my new film, Unlawful Killing, was leaked on to YouTube and seized on by US conspiracy
theorists, who immediately began claiming that the CIA had murdered Princess Diana, thereby allowing others to dismiss
my documentary as mad.

Deriding its critics as mad is an age-old British establishment trick. My inquest of the inquest film contains footage of Diana
recalling how the royals wanted her consigned to a mental institution, and the inquest coroner repeatedly questioning the
sanity of anyone who wondered if the crash was more than an accident.

His chief target was Mohamed Al Fayed, a man I once profiled for a Channel 4 documentary.
Before I met him, Id half-believed the media caricature of him as a madman, driven nuts by the death of his son, and wildly
accusing the Windsors of having planned the 1997 crash.

However, I found a man who was sane and funny but frustrated that Britain wouldnt hold an inquest into his sons death.
Michael Mansfield QC thought it unfair too, and fought for one to be held; which was why the longest inquest in British legal
history eventually began in 2007.

Long before the inquest started, the eminently sane Mansfield had persuaded me that there were suspicious circumstances
surrounding the crash, and signs of a cover-up by the authorities.

Many journalists agreed, but as the inquest drew near, I noticed that British newspapers (several of which had regularly run
Was Diana Murdered? pieces) suddenly fell into line, and started insisting that the inquest was a waste of time.

They raised no protest when virtually all the key French witnesses refused to participate, nor did they find it odd that not one
senior royal was ordered to appear, even though Diana had stated in a lawyers note that the Windsors were planning an
accident to her car.

Nor did they raise the issue of possible bias when legal proceedings involving the integrity of the royal family were to be
heard in the royal courts of justice before a coroner whod sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen.
I felt the need to raise it, so I asked every major UK broadcaster (BBC, ITV, C4, Five, Sky) to commission a TV documentary
about the inquest. But they refused even to contemplate such a suggestion, so Associated Rediffusion and I began filming
and financing it ourselves.

Shortly before the inquest began, Fayed offered to fund our project, so we could make a feature-length cinema documentary
instead. We agreed, on condition that we would report events in the way we saw them, and the deal was struck.

Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy
organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment judges, lawyers,
politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors all of whom have been appointed to their
positions because they are a safe pair of hands.

Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them
when the states interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or
undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.

Consider just a fraction of what transpired. Over 100 significant witnesses were not called to the inquest, or refused to
appear. Blood tests allegedly proving the drunkenness of the driver Henri Paul were deemed biologically inexplicable by a
toxicologist. A British crash expert found that Dianas seat belt had not been working. And so on.
Strangest of all was the media coverage of the verdict. Inquest evidence showed conclusively that the crash was caused by
an unidentified white Fiat Uno and several unidentified motorcycles, vehicles that were certainly not paparazzi, because
uncontested police evidence confirmed that the paparazzi were nowhere near the tunnel at the time of the crash.

The jury understood this, bringing in a verdict of unlawful killing by unidentified following vehicles; yet within seconds,
the BBC was misreporting that the jury had blamed the paparazzi, and the rest of the media meekly followed suit. Which is
why three years on barely anyone realises what the jurys troubling verdict really was.

Why is the film being premiered next week at Cannes, three years after the inquest ended? Because British lawyers insisted
on 87 cuts before any UK release could be contemplated. So rather than butcher the film, or risk legal action, were showing
it in France, then the US, and everywhere except the UK. Pity, because at a time when the mindless sugar rush of the royal
wedding has been sending British Republicans into a diabetic coma, it could act as a welcome antidote.

Related: The Guardian: Unlawful Killing the film the British won't get to see

Whats the significance of the above disclosures? All these stuffs belong to the past already.

If thats the view, then it may interest the reader to know that they are still here.

Merkel is No Angel But a Hitler


Is Merkel a CIA Asset?

Hidden History of the Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia

The battle against evil are still ongoing.

Read more at: Geopolitics

War, Terrorism And The Global Economic Crisis In 2015: One Hundred And Thirteen
Interrelated Concepts
December 31 2015 | From: GlobalResearch

Everything is interrelated: War, terrorism, the police state, the global economy, economic
austerity, financial fraud, corrupt governments, poverty and social inequality, police violence, Al
Qaeda, ISIS, media disinformation, racism, war propaganda weapons of mass destruction, the
derogation of international law, the criminalization of politics, the CIA, the FBI, climate change,
nuclear war, Fukushima, nuclear radiation, crimes against humanity, The China-Russia
alliance, Syria Ukraine, NATO, false flags, 9/11 Truth, .
An overall understanding of this Worldwide crisis is required: the last section deals briefly with reversing the tide
of war, peace-making, instating social justice and real democracy.

This article includes a compendium of relevant citations (from my writings) pertaining to different dimensions of this global
crisis. Citations from other authors are indicated in italics. The hyperlinks in each of the paragraphs indicate the original
source of the quotation.

The Globalization of War: Americas Long War against Humanity

1. The US has embarked on a military adventure, a long war, which threatens the future of humanity. US-NATO weapons
of mass destruction are portrayed as instruments of peace.

2. Major military and covert intelligence operations are being undertaken simultaneously in the Middle East, Eastern
Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, Central Asia and the Far East. The US military agenda combines both major theater operations
as well as covert actions geared towards destabilizing sovereign states.

3. [The] Five-year campaign plan [includes] a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya,
Iran, Somalia and Sudan. General Wesley Clark in Winning Modern Wars (page 130)

4. In 2005, former Vice President Dick Cheney hinted, in no uncertain terms, that Iran was right at the top of the list of the
rogue enemies of America, and that Israel would, so to speak, be doing the bombing for us without being asked, i.e
without US military involvement and without us putting pressure on them to do it

9/11 and The Global War on Terrorism (GWOT)

5. The war on terrorism is a war of conquest. Globalization is the final march to the New World Order, dominated by
Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex.
6. September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without borders. Washingtons agenda consists in
extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America
the institutions of the Homeland Security State.

7. The forbidden truth is that Western governments including US, UK, France, NATO and Israel while waging a self-
proclaimed Global War on Terrorism routinely provide covert support to the same terrorist entities which are the object of
their humanitarian wars and counter-terrorism operations.

War and the Economic Crisis

8. In all major regions of the world, the economic recession is deep-seated, resulting in mass unemployment, the collapse
of state social programs and the impoverishment of millions of people.

9. The economic crisis is accompanied by a worldwide process of militarization, a war without borders led by the United
States of America and its NATO allies. The conduct of the Pentagons long war is intimately related to the restructuring of
the global economy.

10. The Pentagons black operations, including the intelligence budgets nested inside it, are roughly equal in magnitude
to the entire defense budgets of the UK, France or Japan, and ten percent of the total. (Tom Burghardt)

11. An outright economic war resulting in unemployment, poverty and disease is carried out through the free
market. Peoples lives are in a freefall and their purchasing power is destroyed. In a very real sense, the last twenty years of
global free market economy have resulted, through poverty and social destitution, in destroying the lives of millions of
people.

12. Vast amounts of money wealth are acquired through market manipulation. Often referred to as deregulation, the
financial apparatus has developed sophisticated instruments of outright manipulation and deceit.

13. With inside information and foreknowledge, major financial actors, using the instruments of speculative trade, have the
ability to fiddle and rig market movements to their advantage, precipitate the collapse of a competitor and wreck havoc in the
economies of developing countries.

14. What is at stake is a process of financial cleansing whereby the too big to fail banks in Europe and North America
(e.g. Citi, JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, et al ) displace and destroy lesser financial institutions, with a view to
eventually taking over the entire banking landscape.

15. The underlying tendency at the national and global levels is towards the centralization and concentration of bank
power, while leading to the dramatic slump of the real economy.
Greece: Austerity Measures

16. The creditors will use Greeces multibillion debt obligations as means to impose deadly macro-economic reforms
which will serve to destabilize the national economy and further impoverish the population. These are referred to by the IMF
as policy conditionalities, which enable the creditors to essentially dictate economic and social policy.

17. The creditors are largely interested in acquiring real wealth within the national economy, namely the acquisition of
Greeces national banking institutions, its public enterprises, its agricultural land, etc.

Disinformation, Media Propaganda and the CIA


18. Disinformation is routinely planted by CIA operatives in the newsroom of major dailies, magazines and TV channels.
Outside public relations firms are often used to create fake stories.

19. A relatively few well-connected correspondents provide the scoops, that get the coverage in the relatively few
mainstream news sources, where the parameters of debate are set and the official reality is consecrated for the bottom
feeders in the news chain. (Chaim Kupferberg in relation to 9/11 media coverage)

20. To sustain the war agenda, these fabricated realities, funneled on a day to day basis into the news chain must
become indelible truths, which form part of a broad political and media consensus. In this regard, the corporate media
although acting independently of the military-intelligence apparatus, is an instrument of this evolving totalitarian system.

Islamic Terrorism and the Human Mindset

21. Al Qaeda-ISIS concepts, repeated ad nauseam have potentially traumatic impacts on the human mind and the ability
of normal human beings to analyze and comprehend the real outside World of war, politics and the economic crisis.

22. Al Qaeda constitutes a stylized, fake and almost folkloric abstraction of terrorism, which permeates the inner
consciousness of millions of people around the World.

The Islamic State Caliphate Project (ISIS/ISIL/Daesh)


23. Those who ordered the bombing campaign are those who are behind the Caliphate Project.

24. The Islamic State militia, which is currently the alleged target of a US-NATO bombing campaign under a counter-
terrorism mandate, is supported covertly by the United States and its allies.

25. The ISIS terrorists are the foot soldiers of the Western alliance. While America claims to be targeting ISIS, in reality it
is protecting ISIS. The air campaign is intent upon destroying Syria and Iraq rather than going after the terrorists.

26. A complex network of Al Qaeda affiliated terrorist organizations overseen by US and allied intelligence agencies has
unfolded, extending across the Middle East, North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, Central Asia, Western China, South and
South East Asia.

27. The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) is a creation of US intelligence.

Washingtons Counter-terrorism Agenda in Iraq and Syria consists of Supporting the Terrorists
28. The incursion of the Islamic State (IS) brigades into Iraq starting in June 2014 was part of a carefully planned military-
intelligence operation supported covertly by the US, NATO and Israel.

29. Without Western support, according to Vladimir Putin, the terrorists would not have been able to gain control over
entire regions of the country. The so-called Islamic State [ISIS] has taken control of a huge territory. How was that
possible? (Vladimir Putins speech to the Valdai Conference, October 2015)

Western Special Forces are Assisting the Terrorists in Syria

30. Western special forces and covert intelligence agents including British SAS, French Parachutistes, CIA, MI6 and
Mossad have integrated rebel ranks.

31. Their activities are not limited to training. They are routinely involved in overseeing the conduct of terrorist operations
on the ground together with Turkish and Qatari special forces, as well thousands of mercenaries recruited from Muslim
countries.
32.The French have been actively involved in Syria since the outset of the insurgency on the ground in liaison with their
US, British and Israeli counterparts. In February 2012, 13 French military officers were arrested in Homs pointing to the
presence of foreign troops on Syrian soil inside rebel ranks.

Americas Allies: Support to the Islamic State by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey

33. Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan, Qatar, Jordan, et al. have been involved in recruiting, training and financing Islamic
terrorists.

34. A large number of ISIS mercenaries are convicted criminals released from Saudi prisons on condition they join the
ISIL. Saudi death row inmates were recruited to join the terror brigades. (January 23, 2013)

35. The practice of beheading civilians by ISIS operative in Syria emanates from Saudi Arabia.. The ISILs practice of
beheadings is part of the US sponsored terrorist training programs implemented in Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

Israel and the Islamic State

36. Netanyahu does not deny that his governments support of the terrorists in Syria. The IDF top brass has
acknowledged that global jihad elements inside Syria are supported by Israel

37. The State of Israel collaborates with the French authorities in the Charlie Hebdo counterterrorism operation, while
also supporting the two main terrorist entities in Syria: the Islamic State (ISIS) and Al Nusrah.

The Criminalization of the State

38. The Criminalization of the State, is when war criminals legitimately occupy positions of authority, which enable them
to decide who are the criminals, when in fact they are the criminals.

Wars of Aggression are in Violation of International Law and the UN Charter

39. The US, France, Britain are the aggressor nations against Syria. They cannot under any circumstances invoke the
Right of Self-defense.
40. In contrast, Syria is the victim of foreign aggression and has the Right to Self-defense under Article 51 of the UN
Charter which states that: Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of collective or individual self-
defence if an armed attack occurs against a member of the United Nations.

War Crimes

41. The US-NATO led war applied Worlwide is a criminal undertaking under the disguise of counter-terrorism. It violates
the Nuremberg Charter, the US constitution and the UN charter.

42. According to former chief Nuremberg prosector Benjamin Ferencz, in relation to the 2003 invasion of Iraq: a prima
facie case can be made that the United States is guilty of the supreme crime against humanity that being an illegal war of
aggression against a sovereign nation. Ferenz was referring to Crimes against Peace and War (Nuremberg Principle VI)

43. Nuremberg Principle III relates directly to president Obama and the heads of State and heads of government of the
US-NATO led coalition: a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of
State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.

The Clash of Civilizations: Worldwide Campaign against Muslims

44. A good versus evil dichotomy prevails: a Clash of Civilisations.

45. The West has a Mission: We must fight against evil in all its forms as a means to preserving the Western way of life.
The perpetrators of war are presented as the victims.
46. The Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) directed against Al Qaeda launched in the wake of 9/11 is evolving towards
a full-fledged war of religion, a holy crusade directed against the Muslim World.

47. A war of religion is unfolding, with a view to justifying a global military crusade. In the inner consciousness of many
Americans, the holy crusade against Muslims is justified.

48. While President Obama may uphold freedom of religion, the US inquisitorial social order has institutionalized patterns
of discrimination, prejudice and xenophobia directed against Muslims.

49. Ethnic profiling applies to travel, the job market, access to education and social services and more generally to social
status and mobility.

50. The wave of xenophobia directed against Muslims which has swept across Western Europe is tied into geopolitics. It is
part of a military agenda. It consists in demonizing the enemy.

51. Muslim countries possess more than 60 percent of total oil reserves. In contrast, the United States of America has
barely 2 percent of total oil reserves. Iraq has five times more oil than the United States.

52. A large share of the Worlds oil lies in Muslim lands. The objective of the US led war is to steal and appropriate those
oil reserves. And to achieve this objective, these countries are targeted: war, covert ops, economic destabilization, regime
change.

US-NATO Threatens Russia and China


53.The Communist threat of The Cold War era has been replaced by the worldwide threat of Islamic terrorism.

54. Whereas Russia and China have become capitalist free market economies, a first strike pre-emptive nuclear attack is
nonetheless contemplated.

55. China and Russia are no longer considered to be a threat to capitalism. Quite the opposite. What is at stake is
economic and financial rivalry between competing capitalist powers.

56. The China-Russia alliance under the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) constitutes a competing capitalist
block which undermines U.S. economic hegemony.

57. In May 2014, the Russian Aggression Prevention Act (RAPA) was introduced in the US Senate (S 2277), calling for
the militarization of Eastern Europe and the Baltic States and the stationing of US and NATO troops on Russias doorstep

58. In Asia, the U.S. has contributed under its Pivot to Asia to encouraging its Asia-Pacific allies including Japan,
Australia, South Korea, The Philippines and Vietnam to threaten and isolate China as part of a process of military
encirclement of China, which gained impetus in the late 1990s.

The Dangers of Nuclear War


59. In the wake of the Cold War, an understanding on the dangers of nuclear war (MAD) no longer prevails. Publicly
available military documents confirm that pre-emptive nuclear war is still on the drawing board of the Pentagon. Compared
to the 1950s, the nuclear weapons are more advanced. The delivery system is more precise.

60. In addition to China and Russia, Iran, Syria and North Korea are targets for pre-emptive nuclear war. Let us be under
no illusions, the Pentagons plan to blow up the planet using advanced nuclear weapons is still on the books.

61. With an explosive capacity varying between one third and six times a Hiroshima bomb, mini-nukes are said to be
harmless to civilians. Pre-emptive nuclear war is portrayed as a humanitarian undertaking. Scientists on contract to the
Pentagon have endorsed the use of tactical nuclear weapons: they are harmless to civilians because the explosion is
underground.

62. The Pentagon has confirmed its policy of a nuclear first strike against the Russian Federation in response to Russias
alleged aggression against Ukraine. If these US nuclear strikes were to be implemented, humanity would be precipitated
into a Third World War, which could potentially be the final war on planet earth.

63. Should we be concerned? The people at the highest levels of government who decide regarding the use of nuclear
weapons havent the foggiest idea as to the implications of their actions. Blowing up the planet through the use of nuclear
weapons is fully endorsed by presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who believes that nuclear weapons are instruments of
peace-making. Her election campaign is financed by the corporations which produce WMDs.
Pentagon 1959 Plan to implement a Nuclear Holocaust: Excerpt of list of 1200 cities targeted for nuclear attack in alphabetical order

Fidel Castro on the Dangers of Nuclear War

64. The conventional war would be lost by the US and the nuclear war is no alternative for anyone. On the other hand,
nuclear war would inevitably become global

65. I think nobody on Earth wishes the human species to disappear. And that is the reason why I am of the opinion that
what should disappear are not just nuclear weapons, but also conventional weapons. We must provide a guarantee for
peace to all peoples without distinction

66. In a nuclear war the collateral damage would be the life of humankind. Let us have the courage to proclaim that all
nuclear or conventional weapons, everything that is used to make war, must disappear!
67. It is about demanding that the world is not led into a nuclear catastrophe, it is to preserve life. Fidel Castro Ruz,
Havana, October 2010. (Recorded by Michel Chossudovsky, Havana, October 2010, image right, Fidel Castro, Michel
Chossudovsky)

Fukushima: Worldwide Nuclear Radiation

68. The Fukushima disaster in Japan has brought to the forefront the dangers of Worldwide nuclear radiation. The crisis in
Japan has been described as a nuclear war without a war.

69. In the words of renowned novelist Haruki Murakami: This time no one dropped a bomb on us We set the stage, we
committed the crime with our own hands, we are destroying our own lands, and we are destroying our own lives.

70. Nuclear radiation which threatens life on planet earth is not front page news in comparison to the most insignificant
issues of public concern, including the local level crime scene or the tabloid gossip reports on Hollywood celebrities.

71. The shaky political consensus both in Japan, the U.S. and Western Europe is that the crisis at Fukushima has been
contained. The truth is otherwise. Known and documented, the ongoing dumping of highly radioactive water into the Pacific
Ocean constitutes a potential trigger to a process of global radioactive contamination.

72. This water contains plutonium 239 and its release into the Ocean has both local as well as global repercussions.
A microgram of plutonium if inhaled, according to Dr. Helen Caldicott, can cause death

Geo-engineering: Modifying the Weather for Military Use


73. Environmental modification techniques (ENMOD) for military use constitute, in the present context of global warfare,
the ultimate weapon of mass destruction.

74. Rarely acknowledged in the debate on global climate change, the worlds weather can now be modified as part of a
new generation of sophisticated electromagnetic weapons. Both the US and Russia have developed capabilities to
manipulate the climate for military use.

75. Weather manipulation is the pre-emptive weapon par excellence. It can be directed against enemy countries or even
friendly nations, without their knowledge. Weather warfare constitutes a covert form of pre-emptive war. The manipulation
of climate can be used to destabilize an enemys economy, ecosystem and agriculture

The Resurgence of Nazism in Ukraine

76. The forbidden truth is that the West has engineered in Ukraine - through a carefully staged covert operation -the
formation of a proxy regime integrated by Neo-Nazis.

77. Unknown to most Americans, the US government is channeling financial support, weapons and training to a Neo-Nazi
entity which is part of The Ukraine National Guard The Azov Battalion ( ). Canada and Britain have
confirmed that they also are providing support to the National Guard.

78. The Azov Battalion -which officially displays the Nazi SS emblem is described by the Kiev regime as a volunteer
battalion of territorial defense. Its a National Guard battalion under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the
equivalent of Americas Homeland Security.

79. The Azov battalion supported by its Western partners is not only involved in para-military operations in Eastern
Ukraine. it is also running a Summer Camp military training project for young children as part of its broader training and Nazi
indoctrination program.

80. With Svoboda and Right Sector political appointees in charge of national security and the armed forces, a real
grassroots protest movement directed against the IMFs deadly macroeconomic reforms, will in all likelihood be brutally
repressed by the Right Sectors brown shirts and the National Guard paramilitary led by Dmitri Yarosh, on behalf of Wall
Street and the Washington consensus.
The Police State

81. Rather than addressing an impending social catastrophe, Western governments, which serve the interests of the
economic elites, have installed a Big Brother police state, with a mandate to confront and repress all forms of opposition
and social dissent.

82. The Department of Defense now authorizes the domestic deployment of US troops in the conduct of operations other
than war including law enforcement activities and the quelling of civil disturbances.

83. The repeal of democracy is portrayed as a means to providing domestic security and upholding civil liberties.

84. An FBI department established in 2004 under the Bush administration was conducive to the integration of law
enforcement and domestic spying. Its mandate was essentially political, directed at curbing all forms of social and political
dissent in America.

85. According to a 2004 Report of the Homeland Security Council, these domestic conspirators are said to be acting in
coordination with foreign terrorists. The Report identified domestic radical groups and disgruntled employees.

The November 13, 2015 Paris Terror Attacks

86. The November 13 attacks were immediately followed by the enactment of a State of Emergency, the closing of
Frances borders and the suspension of civil liberties as a means - according to president Franois Hollande to
safeguarding democratic values.
87. The tragic loss of life has been used by the Hollande government (with the support of the media) to harness the public
into accepting the implementation of police state measures in the interest of French Republic, namely protecting Frances
national security against an illusive self-proclaimed Islamic State based in Northern Syria, which happens to be a creation
of US intelligence.

88. The measures also included procedures which enable the police to conduct arbitrary arrests and house searches
without a warrant within the Paris metropolitan area opening up the development of a potential hate campaign directed
against Frances Muslim population.

89. These drastic police state measures (including the repeal of habeas corpus) ordered by president Hollande were
decided upon prior and in the absence of a police report.

Reversing the Tide of War, Building Peace, Democracy and Social Justice
90. War propaganda has become increasingly pervasive. War is upheld as a peace-making operation.

91. When war becomes peace, the world is turned upside down. Conceptualization is no longer possible. An inquisitorial
social system emerges. The consensus is to wage war. People can longer think for themselves. They accept the authority
and wisdom of the established social order.

92. War however is not an inevitable process.

93. War can be prevented through mass social action.

94. The issue is not whether the war will inevitably take place but what are the instruments at our disposal which will
enable us to shunt and ultimately disarm this global military agenda.

95. War criminals occupy positions of authority. The citizenry is galvanized into supporting the rulers, who are committed
to their safety and well-being. Through media disinformation, war is given a humanitarian mandate.

96. The legitimacy of war must be addressed. Antiwar sentiment alone does not disarm a military agenda. High ranking
officials of the Obama administration, members of the military and the US Congress have been granted the authority to
uphold an illegal war.

97. A significant segment of the antiwar movement has been co-opted. We are against war but we support the war on
terrorism. We can rely on an ambiguous political discourse.

98. How does one effectively break the war and police state agendas?

99. Essentially by refuting the war on terrorism and Americas holy crusade against the Islamic jihad which constitute
the very foundations of Americas national security doctrine.

100. Without the war on terrorism, politicians in high office do not have a leg to stand on. Once the Big Lie is
fully revealed, their legitimacy collapses like a deck of cards.
101. How best to achieve this objective? By fully uncovering the lies behind the war on terrorism and revealing the fact
amply documented that Western governments are supporting the terrorists, i.e. they are State sponsors of terrorism.

102. Media propaganda sustains the legitimacy of war on terrorism. Evil folks are lurking, the jihad is said to be
threatening the Western World

103. The corporate backers and sponsors of war and war crimes must also be targeted including the oil companies, the
defense contractors, the financial institutions and the corporate media, which has become an integral part of the war
propaganda machine.

Regime Change in the West


104. What is required is a grass roots antiwar network, a mass movement at national and international levels, which
challenges the legitimacy of the main military and political actors, as well as their corporate sponsors, and which would
ultimately be instrumental in unseating those who rule in our name.

105. This is no easy task. The first step is to break the consensus, and that is done through what we might describe as
counter-propaganda. It is in this context that Truth becomes a powerful weapon.

106. The construction of this type of network will take time to develop. Initially, it should focus on developing a firm antiwar
stance within existing citizens organizations (e.g. trade unions, community organizations, professional regroupings, student
federations, municipal councils, etc.).

In many of these, organizations, however, which include NGOs such as Amnesty International, the leadership has been
coopted; many of these organizations are generously funded by corporate foundations. In turn, since 2003, the antiwar
movement in Western countries is virtually at a standstill.

107. Breaking the Lie means breaking a criminal project of global destruction, in which the quest for profit is the overriding
force.

108. This profit-driven military agenda destroys human values and transforms people into unconscious zombies.
109. Let us reverse the tide by breaking the consensus, namely by breaking the propaganda apparatus.

110. Swaying public opinion is not enough what has to be undertaken is to break the process of internal
propaganda within government, the judicial system, law enforcement, the military, intelligence, etc. Because ultimately
these are the areas where decisions are taken.

111. The doctrine of the US Armed Forces is the war on terrorism. It is deeply entrenched. It provides a Just Cause to
war. It is the driving force behind the troops. It is used to provide legitimacy to the bombing raids. What needs to done is to
break the decision making process within the military through counter propaganda.

112. William Shakespeares rightfully describes in our contemporary World the architects of the New World Order:Hell is
empty and all the devils are here.

113. Our indelible task is to send the devils of our time, the self-proclaimed architects of democracy and the free
market, down to where they rightfully belong.

Ron Paul: Is Islam On The Verge Of Engulfing Western Civilization?


December 31 2015 | From: RonPaul

The neocons want us to believe that we are in a war to the death between Christian civilization and
the Islamic world. But they know nothing of either Christian civilization or Islam.
The only part they really want, is war. Perpetual war.

Anonymous #OpISIS Claims To Have Preempted A Terror Attack


December 30 2015 | From: Geopolitics

ISIS will implode. Were digging your graves.


This is how Anonymous is taking the battle closely to the Islamic State.

Anonymous claims to have foiled an Isis terror attack in Italy.

The primary account behind Operation Isis has claimed that online activists affiliated with Anonymous stopped
one attack and is working to stop others.

Anonymous stepped up its war on Isis in the wake of early Novembers attacks in Paris that left 130 people dead.
Shortly after those events the group released a video saying that it was going to hunt down Isis members and
would launch the biggest operation ever against it.

Expect massive cyber attacks, a voice said in the video. War is declared. Get prepared.

Operation Isis has largely focused on finding and shutting down social media accounts and websites belonging to
people who are thought to sympathise with or be part of Isis.

Some have suggested that work is helpful since it stops the spread of propaganda by accounts. But others have
pointed out that the group has leaked false information, as well as getting in the way of authorities efforts.

Now the group has claimed to have gone further than those efforts, moving instead to stopping attacks in the real
world.

- Source

Of course, everybody can claim they are part of Anonymous and create some confusion as to what is real and disinformation
to sustain fear. But
"Last month, the Free Thought Project reported on
Anonymous move to publish a Guide to Fighting
ISIS Online."

The release of this guide enlisted the talents of amateur


hackers worldwide, and the results have been nothing short
of phenomenal.

The guide was published in an IRC (internet relay chat)


channel by a member of the hacker group. That member
released the guide, along with the following message.

"Instead of sitting idle in the [chat] channel or lurking


around and doing nothing, you can benefit greatly
from the different tools and guides that have been
provided to you, he wrote. Your contribution means
a lot and we encourage you to partake in all of the
Ops activities if you can, the more the merrier.

Tens of thousands more ISIS-affiliated social media


accounts have been removed since the guide went public.

After it was revealed that ISIS is being aided and supported


by Turkey, Anonymous launched a massive attack against
the NATO country last week. In an extensive DDoS attack,
the group took down some 40,000 Turkish servers.
While many have been critical of Anonymouss digital attacks, claiming that they do not hurt ISIS, news of them stopping a
physical attack is sure to rattle some cages.

As the fight against terror becomes a vigilante operation, one thing is certain, Anonymous is here to stay and a force to surely
be reckoned with.

Related: Anonymous Takes #OpISIS To A New Level By Stopping An Actual Terror Attack
2015: The Year Russia Told America Enough
December 29 2015 | From: Geopolitics

Since 2003, Moscow has watched with infinite patience as US-led forces have steadily
steamrolled a path of chaos and carnage across a large swath of Central Asia, the Middle East and
North Africa. This year Vladimir Putin drew a line at Syria.
Barely 2 days after the above high-level toast between the two leaders who were exhausted of their mega speeches
at the UN General Assembly, Putin ordered the massive bombardment against the CIA trained Islamic State in
Syria.

After the unexpected Turkish ambush of its warplane, he further ordered the delivery of some of the most advanced
weaponry from the Russian arsenal into the Syrian theater.
RT: 2015: The year Russia told America Enough

Since 2003, Moscow has watched with infinite patience as US-led forces have steadily steamrolled a path of chaos
and carnage across a large swath of Central Asia, the Middle East and North Africa.

This year Vladimir Putin drew a line at Syria.

In an age when diplomats regularly correspond with each other behind the cold cover of firewalls and Twitter accounts,
Moscows method of informing its US partners that it would start bombing operations in Syria was reminiscent of a gesture
from a more chivalrous era.

Washington said it first learned of Moscows plans in Syria when it received a personal visit from a Russian general who
appeared at the US Embassy in Baghdad.

Syria bombing: Russian three star general warned US officials 'we request your people leave'

Just hours later, the Russian military with the full support of Damascus stunned the world by opening a powerful aerial
assault against Islamic State forces in Syria where they were stubbornly entrenched not only as a viable fighting force, but
as the owners and operators of a profitable oil-producing enterprise, no less.

This Russian demonstration of shock-and-awe provided an exclamation point to comments delivered by President Vladimir
Putin, who just one day earlier had berated Western powers in the UN General Assembly for the massive mess they had
created in the region.
"Im urged to ask those who created this situation: do you at least realize now what youve done? But Im
afraid that this question will remain unanswered, because they have never abandoned their policy, which
is based on arrogance, exceptionalism and impunity, Putin told the audience

The Russian leader went on to make a direct connection between the Wests blundering foreign policy, which has recklessly
usurped various leaders and governments without any clear idea as to what or who will fill the vacuum, and the rise of
Islamic State.

"The so-called Islamic State has tens of thousands of militants fighting for it, including former Iraqi
soldiers who were left on the street after the 2003 invasion. Many recruits come from Libya whose
statehood was destroyed And now radical groups are joined by members of the so-called moderate
Syrian opposition backed by the West. They get weapons and training, and then they defect and join the
so-called Islamic State,he noted.

Putin is far too experienced a statesman to say exactly which global power(s) might be interested in cannibalizing the
broken bits and pieces of Iraq, Libya and Syria and turning them into a private proxy army, but he left no doubt that the rise
of Islamic State was by no means an accident.

In fact, the Islamic State itself did not come out of nowhere, Putin said, in what may have been the most
telling yet downplayed part of his speech. It was initially developed as a weapon against undesirable
secular regimes.
Putin is by no means alone in this belief. In May of this year, Judicial Watch, in response to Freedom of Information Act
requests and lawsuits, became privy to some highly explosive Pentagon documents that were compiled about a year before
Islamic State appeared on the global stage in their Toyota trucks and US-made weapons.

The document states that The Salafist [Islamic State], the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI [Al-Qaeda in Iraq] are the major
forces driving the insurgency in Syria. The West, Gulf countries, and Turkey support the opposition; while Russia, China,
and Iran support the regime.

The declassified document continues:

If the situation unravels there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist
principality in Eastern Syria and this is exactly what the supporting powers [i.e. The West, Gulf countries
and Turkey] to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered the strategic
depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran).

Related: Newly-Declassified U.S. Government Documents: The West Supported the Creation of ISIS

As the Washington Blog pointed out, the document proves what so many opponents of the Syrian intervention have been
saying for five years: There is no moderate opposition in Syria.

It shows that extreme Muslim terrorists Salafist, Muslims Brotherhood, and AQI have always been the
major forces driving the insurgency in Syria.

It is no wonder that US policies seem to have created far more terrorists than theyve eliminated essentially because it is
part and parcel of the strategy from the beginning to use these terrorists as proxy armies to take out undesirable
governments.

Russia came to the realization that not doing anything about Islamic State was a far riskier alternative than allowing this
group of savages to continue to flourish practically unmolested in Syria in dangerous proximity to the Russian border, not to
mention Russias naval base at Tartus.
Yet somehow Russias rather predictable move caught the West completely off-guard.

It doesnt concern me in the slightest, US Senator John McCain said in 2013, when asked if he thought
Russia and China would intervene in Syria. Because they will not act.

The United States is the most powerful nation in the world, and were not going to be intimidated by Russia and
China, he continued. We are not, so I guarantee you that they will not act.

NATO-member Turkey, who has been accused of purchasing oil from Islamic State, was also caught unawares by Russias
lightning move in Syria [Incidentally, Russia the only country that is operating in Syria with the full legal backing of the Syrian
government].

In fact, Ankara, oddly enraged over Russias determined efforts to destroy not only Islamic States command center, but its
oil business as well, took the world to the brink of World War III when it shot down a Russian fighter jet that it says crossed
into Turkish territory.
A Russian Su-24 front-line bomber jet

Meanwhile, a recent statement by a Turkish official revealing detailed information of Russian Air Force sorties in Syria can
be regarded as official acknowledgment that the operation to down the Su-24 was a planned one, Russias Ministry of
Defense said.

When on November 24 the Turkish fighter jet treacherously fired a rocket at our Su-24, the Turkish
General Staff was perfectly aware about when and where our two bombers would be carrying out their
mission, ministry spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov told journalists on Wednesday.

Clearly, Putins decision to enter the Syrian conflict was a risky one, yet it appears now for all the wrong reasons. Incredibly,
Moscow seems to be having less of a problem handling Islamic State than it is with those Western states that had
proclaimed their dedication to wiping out the terrorist organization in the first place.

Russias military operation in Syria has uncovered a hornets nest of illicit activity, much of which is only indirectly connected
to Islamic State. Where such disturbing revelations will lead us in 2016, it is too early to say, but the prospects for peace in
Syria anytime soon do not look very likely.

Heres a good close-up look at ISIS living pipeline before being bombed by Russian aviation

This living pipeline is crossing Turkish border


Mainstream Media Manipulation / Controlling The Narrative
+ Mosaic Of Facts: Inside The Information War
December 26 2015 | From: RTD

Can you tell truth from lies in mass media?

The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the
guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses."

- Malcolm X

The following is a excerpt from the documentary: Mosaic Of Facts: Inside The Information War

The full documentary is below this trailer:

Mosaic Of Facts: Inside The Information War

RTDs Miguel Francis-Santiago delves deep to try to understand the intricacies of information war. He meets media experts
and puts together the Mosaic of Facts, showing how public opinion is manipulated, not just over the Ukrainian Crisis but
throughout the world.
US-NATOs Counter-Christmas Crusade Against The Cradle Of Civilization And The
Holy Land
December 25 2015 | From: GlobalResearch

Its really 19th century behavior in the 21st century. You just dont invade another country on
phony pretexts in order to assert your interests. - John Kerry, Meet the Press, 2nd March 2014.

There has been a searing irony to Christmas since August 1990 and the decimating embargo on Iraq.

It marked the beginning of the destruction of the region where the three Abrahamic religions were born at Ur in southern
Iraq, where the Garden of Eden is believed to have flourished at Al-Qurnah, translation connection or joint, since it is
where the Biblical Tigris and Euphrates rivers join.

In Al-Qurnah an ancient jujube tree a fruit species, cultivation of which is believed to go back to 900 BCE was
celebrated as the actual Biblical Tree of Knowledge.
Nearby is Babylon, found in the Books of Genesis, Peter and Revelations. Neighbouring Syria, is also part of the Cradle of
Civilization, integral to Biblical narrative.

Jesus delivered the Sermon on the Mount (Mount Hermon) which according to the Book of Matthew included:

"Syria, you are the cradle of the prophets and apostles and the center that spreads the gospel from Antioch in
Syria to the world, and paved the way of the Forefathers of the Church to continue.

St Paul of course converted on the road to Damascus where he was actually headed to persecute Christians not to
become one of them.
Geographically next door to Syria is what remains of Israeli occupied Palestine, Christs birthplace in Bethlehem, where, at
what is now the Church of the Nativity, He was believed born.

Above are just a few of the jewels of a region now decimated by that created by George W. Bushs and Tony Blairs
Crusade, not to mention Obama and Camerons humanitarian bombings of the Land of two Rivers.

Ur was vandalized by the US army, who arrived with Bibles in vast stocks, missionaries and plans for proselytizing those
who had nurtured and stewarded the regions wonders of all religions for centuries.

Al-Qurna was stormed and devastatingly damaged by British, Lithuanian and Danish troops, the Tree of Knowledge whose
legend and life seemingly spanned the mists of time, died, near certainly from the poisonous pollution of battle, more
poisonous even than that which destroyed over half all fauna and flora after the Desert Storm 1991 onslaught, leaving the
soil dead and infertile for years afterwards.
Syrias tragedy in the ongoing Crusade, determination to redraw the map of the Middle East and steal all natural resources
rather than purchase them, is outside the scope of this article.

However, Mount Hermon is now part of the buffer zone between Syria and Israeli occupied territory and the highest
permanently manned United Nations position on earth. Jesus wept comes to mind.

As for Bethlehems Little Town so central during the Christmas period, it is prisoner to a wall eight meters high, which:

"Snakes through and around Bethlehem, disrupting social, religious, cultural and economic life.

The brilliant political artist Banksys Christmas card shows Joseph, with Mary on a donkey, on their way to Bethlehem for
Christs birth only to be blocked by the wall.
At Al Quds University last week, the most poignant of Christmas trees was unveiled to Absent Friends, attended by the
Mufti of Bethlehem, Sheikh Abdul Majid Amarna, Universitys President, Imad Abu Kishk and Greek Orthodox Archbishop
Atallah Hanna.

The tree was decorated with photographs of those killed by Israeli settlers and Israeli security forces (demonstrating) unity
between Christian and Muslim students. It received predictable criticism from Israeli media.

The tree is a microcosm of the unity to be found across the region and the world between all faiths and none. So where did
this rabid Islamophobia, as demonstrated in swathes of mainstream Western media and by politicians suddenly come from?
It came primarily from a forty-two million dollar fund from seven foundations read and all will become crystal clear.

Related: $42 Million From Seven Foundations Helped Fuel The Rise Of Islamophobia In America

Some excellent links also to be found at and the CIAs input:

Related: Who are the millionaires behind the Islamophobic industry in America?

Related: ISIS Beheadings of Journalists: CIA Admitted to Staging Fake Jihadist Videos in 2010

However, it was the Orthodox Church of the Holy Land which first spotted the dangers of a creeping hate campaign,
responding on 31st March 2003, as the bombs fell on Iraq, by excommunicating Tony Blair, his then Foreign Secretary Jack
Straw, George W. Bush and his Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, from the Church of the Nativity, for life.

Blair, Straw and Bush all declare passionate Christian faith, with Bush and Blair stating they prayed together prior to
illegally decimating Abrahams birth country.

A spokesman of the Orthodox Church in the Holy Land, Archimandrite Attallah Hanna declared that U.S.
President George Bush, his Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Tony Blair and Foreign Secretary Jack Straw
have all been banned from visiting the traditional birth place of Christ in Bethlehem.

Hanna described both Bush and Blair as excommunicates.

David Cameron has also expressed an evangelical passion for Christianity as he plots to further destroy Syria. With any
luck hell be the next to be banned.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon recently said: The world is over-armed and peace is under funded.

Obama, Cameron, Hollande et al are war criminals. They have violated the Spirit of Christmas.
Alex Jones Exposes The Truth Behind Star Wars
December 24 2015 | From: Infowars

Once again, science fiction mirrors reality...

Star Wars: The Force Awakens has hit theaters, continuing the cinematic saga of an interplanetary civilizations
struggles with galactic war and tyranny.

Alex Jones breaks down the hidden truth behind the Star Wars films detailing the global warfare driven by a planetary
empire on the verge of descending into a militarized police state.

Donald Trump Accuses Israel Of Funding ISIS


December 17 2015 | From: YourNewsWire

Shortly before cancelling his Israel trip, Presidential candidate Donald Trump appeared on national
television and dropped the bombshell that he believes that Israel support ISIS by funding them.

Related: Netanyahu Admits ISIS Are Israeli Soldiers


On the Morning Joe show, Trump said:

Donald: Right now, you have things going on, you have so called people that you think are on our side, theyre not
reporting it, theyre not talking about it, and in some cases theyre involved with it. I mean look: Ill give you an
example.

Some of our so-called allies that we work with and that we protect militarily, they are sending massive amounts of
money to ISIS and to al-Queda and to others.

Joe: So, who are you talking about there?

Donald: You know who it is. What do I have to bring it up for? You know who it is.

Joe: Because youre running for President. Are you talking about the Saudis?

Donald: Joe. Hey Joe. Other countries are giving massive amounts of money. People from other countries are
giving massive amounts of money.

Joe: So are you saying the Saudis are doing this?

Donald: Of course theyre doing it. Everybody knows that.

Joe: Okay, any other countries?

Donald: There are, but Im not gonna say it, because I have a lot of relationships with people. But there are. And
you know that. And everybody knows that. And nobody says it. Nobody talks about it.
Joe: You arent even saying the countries that are doing it right now. Why arent you willing to name those you
say you have a lot of relationships

Donald: Hey Joe. Joe. All you have to do is check your records. Our government knows the countries.
Everybody Knows.

Related: Trump says our friend Israel funds Daesh terrorists

Dailystormer.com reports:

Everybody in the government and the media knows, is what he means by that. The average person doesnt know.
Everybody who reads the Daily Stormer knows. The country pouring money into ISIS that Donald Trump just referred to is
Israel. And the way he said it was pure magic. Exactly how it should have been done.

(Note: Some have been saying he could have been talking Turkey, but thats obviously wrong. If hes going to call out Saudi
Arabia, hed call out Turkey. This was a country which is unmentionable. And there is only one such country.)

The media purposefully avoided mentioning this little exchange, because of course they dont want people Googling which
countries fund ISIS.

But Donald was signaling. Not just to us (though he was doing that), but to all the powerful and/or intelligent goyim in the
world who understand the situation with the Jews and are fed-up with it. There are people all over who know what we talk
about here, because they are involved with the world.

Related: Israel - A Nation Founded Upon A Monumental Lie


They just are bullied into not talking about it. There are people in government, there are high-level businessmen, there are
people in law enforcement and intelligence who are sick to death of these [Khazarian Satanist] Jews.

Theyre as unclear as we are about his connections to certain Jews, and how he is going to approach this foremost of
problems. He was signaling to all of them: look, Im gonna deal with this.

Because you dont call out Israel for funding ISIS unless youre serious about dealing with the Jewish problem. I am
absolutely certain that backchannels of the rich and powerful were as loud about that 90 second exchange as the national
media was silent.

With each day that goes by, my faith increases that the Donald could truly turn this thing around to where we might have a
chance. He has entered a whole new realm. The fire rises.

Related: Trump Not Wrong When He Said That Hillary Has Killed Hundreds of Thousands of People

San Bernardino Mass Shooting Unleashed To Silence Russian Bombshell Regarding


ISIS-NATO Oil Weapons Swaps
December 6 2015 | From: Geopolitics

Mainstream media are on a defensive after Russian ISIS-Turkey complicity bombshell, they must
have other newsworthy subjects to air on.

For the last 2 days, world media are forced to discuss the official pronouncements of the Russian MoD detailing at
least 3 routes of living pipelines, all terminating inside Turkey.

Related: Proof: San Bernardino Mass Shooting is Fear Mongering Only

For four long years, the Islamic State Enterprise has been exporting millions of barrels of oil from hijacked oilfields in Syria
and Iraq to which the United States and NATO, with their massive surveillance systems and spy satellites, were so
deafeningly silent about.

As always, whenever Russia talks the whole global media must be drowned out with other breaking event.
This is the reason why we refused to entertain the recent San Bernardino mas shooting right away because sooner or
later, the real story would come out eventually, like so:

SWAT teams were already at the scene when the mass shooting happened; they were conducting, well you guess it,
active shooter exercise [here];

2 days prior, VVC students help law enforcement in campus drill: VICTORVILLE San Bernardino County Sheriffs
deputies, unloaded guns drawn, shouted Get down! Get on the ground! as they cleared the Victor Valley College library on
Monday morning during an active shooter exercise Meanwhile, students with pretend injuries acted as victims of a
campus shooting. [here];

These series of false flag operations have become too boring to watch, and it wont come as a surprise if they decide later
on to launch a real one and we choose not to respond thinking it is a non-event. It is therefore critical to continue monitoring
similar events in the future while carefully trying to understand every motivation behind their operation.
Definitely, the San Bernardino mass shooting is aimed at silencing the conversation regarding Turkeys and NATOs
culpability of the rise of the Islamic State terrorist and oil smuggling operations.

Remember, the Russians are not through yet with their ISIS-NATO evidence based disclosures, which should require the
other side to unleash more false flag operations in the near future. Not to mention the rise in sales of arms and ammo after
every mass shooting events [here].

The major problem for the controlled mainstream media, however, is the fact that even ordinary Turks on the ground were
not so surprised about Russias ISIS-NATO oil smuggling revelations.

Read more at: Geopolitics

Christchurch: The Man-Made Earthquakes - What Really Happened, How And Why
December 5 2015 | From: GodElectric

The Rothschild cartel attacked Christchurch with their Earthquake weaponry killing 185 people and
injuring thousands over a prolonged period.

This article is written from the perspective of someone on the ground during these events, employed at the leading
Geotechnical Engineering firm in the country, which was responsible for the Earthquake Commission land damage
assessments. I am not a whistleblower, the people in the military have yet to come forward.

It is believed that the motive for the attack was financial greed. The Rothschild cartel used the military industrial complex to
target the Central Business District of Christchurch, the area with the highest land values as a method of releasing stored
funds.

Prior to the Christchurch Earthquake New Zealand was the least indebted nation of the western world. Increasing
Government debt driving wealth back into corrupt insurance cartels of the City of London and other financial institutions of
the world was done at the expense of the people of New Zealand.
The motive of greed meant the destruction of the city was planned meticulously. Little thought was given in regards to any
rebuild.

Corrupt banking cartels privately bought up the most profitable part of the reconstruction process, the project management
companies like Fletchers, in advance of the Earthquake occurring.

Earthquakes are the result of charge displacement, causing underground lightning. The hieroglyphs describe the dynamics
of Earth events, through the relationship explained by Sekhmet and Ptah.

To understand how Earthquakes can be electrically induced, we will begin by explaining what is commonly termed as
HAARP.

Related: Chemtrails, Geoengineering, Weather Modification & Weather Warfare

Bernard Eastlunds patent is shown below adjacent to the Tutankhamen headrest, together highlighting how the dynamics of
the Earth and how it can be used to magnify energy for natural disasters. In theory HAARP can charge the Van Allen Belts
moving charge layers, inducing charge in the rocks below.

Bernard Eastlund HAARP Patent alongside Tutankhamen Headrest.

The conclusion section of the patent contains the following text:


This invention has a phenomenal variety of possible ramifications and potential future developments... Two new
approaches to weather modification and control are suggested.

The first is for manipulation of the steering winds that control the development of mesocyclones, or the modification
of the directions of the jet streams that influence development of hurricanes. The second is a method for
influencing the electrical charge distribution in weather patterns such as meso-cyclones.

Possible defense applications include a method of accelerating electrons to MEV energies in conjunction with the
HAARP antenna. Research applications include the creation of bright and controlled guide stars for astrophysical
purposes.

Thus it can be seen that the ramifications are numerous, far-reaching, and exceedingly varied in usefulness."

Shu - Djed Column

Djed column

I believe a number of different types of Earthquake weapons were used on Christchurch. I happened to be positioned at
both the transmission and receiving nodes during the December earthquake event and was subsequently mind controlled
out of the country, narrowly escaping death.
Raytheon, the company owned by Rothschild cartel bought the patents to HAARP and have offices in Christchurch, what is
more worrying is they also have bases located across the entire Antarctic continent. This is of significant strategic
importance.

John Key says: Christchurch Earthquake was man made?

Even though it is clear that New Zealand Prime Minister is a Cabal sellout / placement (or there is simply no way
he would have come to hold such an office), he was clearly fumbling or pissed off on some level with what
happened there as he twice referrs to the quake/s as man made in a thinly veiled manner:

Signals are magnified at the poles of the earth many thousands of times by the phenomenon known as Tesla Magnifying
Resonance, creating the energy required for large natural disasters. Because of this phenomenon both Lockheed Martin,
Raytheon, the U.S. Navy, Russia and China are in a race for military supremacy at the poles.

SuperDARN is one such array that is already established at the poles of the earth under the guise of experimentation, it
does however have hidden modes of operation which have been photographed such as at Unwin radar.
The Unwin Radar

The station is very significant from a global perspective as it completes a worldwide network of radars focussed on
auroral zones, called SuperDARN.

Southland is regarded as an ideal location for such a facility because of the southerly aspect, low radio noise and
unobstructed horizon."

- From the Venture Southland website

The Unwin Radar (Left) and significant ionization visible near Unwin SuperDARN Radar - Bluff, New Zealand (right)

The SuperDARN radar is strategically located, near the main electricity trunk line from Manapouri power plant that serves
the Aluminium smelters at the south of the island.

I was holidaying near Bluff on the Southern tip of New Zealand, 3 days before the December 2011 earthquake for my trip to
Stewart Island. I saw an ionized rainbow cloud not more than 1km above the surface of the earth, I heard clicking
interference on the radio and suffered severe drowsiness. Later that day there was a wave formation of clouds going back to
a singular point in the sky as far as the eye could see.

Below is a picture of backscatter in Bluff, this was occurring during the week prior to the larger earthquake events in
Christchurch.
22 December 2012 (Approx. 24hrs to Event) - Backscatter producing Scalar Cloud Spiral near Unwin Radar - Bluff, New Zealand

Before the larger earthquake event Russian media channel RT reported 107 dead pilot whales being washed ashore on
Stewart Island, close to where Unwin radar is located.

Because of the power transmitted into the ionosphere by these antennae interference can be heard on all bands of the car
radio, shown below.
Truthers on the internet did a great job of exposing what happened, with videos such as the one below appearing on
Youtube.

The power for these Earthquakes is not generated in the core of the Earth. The hieroglyphs explain we are part of an
Electric Universe. Gods Electricity flows through the galaxy charging planets and stars.

SuperDARN type RADARs couple into the ionosphere through mechanics explained by Pakhet, generating the power
needed to create the larger natural disasters such as erupting volcanoes and earthquakes.

When used in this manor the Galactic power line, or Gods Electricity is used to destroy cities like Christchurch, New Zealand
and others. God will answer this stupidity, its written into the heart of our civilization, in our music as an Omen.
Central Business District Targeted - Christchurch, New Zealand

The earthquakes were 'pepperdusted' daily across the Canterbury plain by the military industrial complex. Coordinates were
given regardless of the lithosphere - hallmark evidence that a HAARP weapon was being used to generate the land
damage. Sometimes ruptures would occur less than 10km below the surface of Christchurch, at extremely shallow depths.

The vertical acceleration was recorded up to 2.7G or 2.7 times the force of gravity, extraordinarily high for the magnitude of
earthquake. For a shallow rupture to develop such a high vertical force HAARP or an Earthquake weapon is the only
plausible explanation, the physics are more akin to having a bomb detonate underground.
2.7G Vertical Acceleration. Shallow Rupture. Click on the image above to view a bigger version in a new window

In the Cashmere Caverns below Christchurch, one of the worlds most accurate Ring Lasers was installed in 2005. This
extremely expensive and sensitive equipment was unmanned and supposedly installed for the Canterbury Physics
department.

It did however have a live uplink onto the internet which the military could in theory have accessed allowing them to
accurately calculate the charge state of the surrounding area.

Fox news also reported that 9 US senators, plus the head of FEMA and a "delegation" just "happened" to be in
Christchurch New Zealand and just "happened" to leave a couple of hours before the quake struck.

They marked the anniversary of the Earthquake with an electrical weather event. Golf ball hail rained down on the people of
Christchurch.

Could the NWO be in the process of unknowingly for filling Bible prophecy -

Earthquakes in divers places."

- (Matt 24:7) (Mark 13:8) (Luke 21:11)

If you read this article, it is important you understand the site mindcontrol.se. Your thoughts are not always your own.

Also I can recommend reading Robert Duncans Book Soul Catcher. It has a very exact account of the methods and
practices used to torture me, as a Civil Engineer who saw the truth whilst on the ground in Christchurch. I never cried for
these people that tortured me, despite being locked up, tortured and discredited so that I lost my career.

The only times I would ever cry is when they would use my true love against me, threatening to rape and abuse her via
synthetic experiences, synthetic telepathy and Voice to Skull technology.

I underwent years of torture like this. The most hurtful of any being ten years earlier for reasons I do not understand, they
deceived her from me using this technology soon after we fell in love whilst studying at University.

(Note: On page 235 Robert Duncan explains that the leadership of this planet still use the phonetic translation of the
hieroglyphs to communicate, which is effectively showing their complete ineptitude due to greed. They failed to look at even
the basic principles in nature knowing full well this is an Electric Universe.)

The hieroglyphs for Ramesses and Osiris explain that the electrical resonance of Earth and the creation of Earthquakes is
watched by the Gods or advanced life in the cosmos. Not only this but every thought is being watched, including the entirety
of the Illuminati or leadership of this planet.

The symbol that is the Eye of Providence carries with it this very meaning, that nothing is hidden from the cosmos. The
cosmos allows free will on Earth but explains clearly that this universe is about love.

The leadership of our planet has become stupid over time because they do not follow this path, instead following a path of
greed, blinding them from the real truth which is Gods earth. It is true that I proved God to my mind controller, by
deciphering the hieroglyphs infront of them as they tortured me from my true love.
Anubis - Egyptian Jackal

Truth is stranger than fiction, its an extraordinary Universe and our hearts and minds are linked to it

- Anubis

The meaning of the word conspiracy - "A secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful".

Related: Was the Christchurch earthquake a terrible natural disaster, or was it a terrible MAN MADE disaster?

My Story [Draft]

Note: The following account was written by the author of the article above. It deals with advanced mind
control technologies which most people are not aware of. This material is disturbing - and will sound unbelievable
to some - but the reality is that these technologies do in fact exist . Images have been added to provide context.

Related: Monarch Mind Control & The MK-Ultra Program

I am a TI that has been extensively tortured using military grade mind control since 2002. My girlfriend was taken from me
and I believe she was raped however I am unable to help her because she refuses to speak with me. I have been placed
under HAARP during its activation for the 4th largest induced earthquake in Christchurch.

I have also been subjected to years of synthetic experiences, they use the love I have for my girlfriend as a means to try and
break me down. The worst torture I have endured has been months of a tingling sensation under my scrotum induced my
military grade mind control weaponry with a man in my head saying "she is being penetrated by another man".

The Summary of Events

New Zealand I arrived in New Zealand August 2011, blissfully ignorant that manmade earthquakes were a reality, having
never heard of HAARP or Electric Universe theory. I immediately started work at T&T where I was to evaluate Land damage
for the Canterbury Land Information report and EQC claims.

EQC is the New Zealand Earthquake commission that provide disaster insurance for residential property in the event of a
natural disaster. I am a fit and healthy man who understands his body, it was apparent that working in Christchurch I would
suffer from severe exhaustion, usually in the run up to Earthquakes.

I was also speaking to the people of Christchurch, face to face contact with up to 30 Earthquake victims per day and many
would describe similar symptoms. If you have ever been in a big earthquake you will understand the immense power to
behold, to comprehend how this could be man-made took me some deliberation.

I have explained using the hieroglyphs and the theory behind Tesla Magnifying Resonance using the Earth and how they
achieve this effect in the appendix of this document. December 19th I was driving a hire car to Bluff for a Christmas vacation
to Stewart Island, I approached Bluff from the Catlins Conservatory Park on the Tokanui Gorge Road Highway and Gorge
Road Invercargill Highway.
Related: Unraveling Nikola Teslas Greatest Secret: Radiant Energy

All the occupants of the vehicle, were suffering from severe drowsiness and were asleep despite being fully rested the
previous day at Dunedin. Sometime between 2:00pm and 4:00pm close to my approach to Invercargill outside the left hand
window of the vehicle was a ionized rainbow cloud, not more than 1km above the surface of the earth.

It puzzled me and I questioned the occupants of the vehicle as to what sort of rainbow can appear in a cloud, no one could
answer the question and we did not stop to investigate because we were all suffering from severe drowsiness. There was
also clicking interference on all bands of the car radio, including FM.

I have included a photo similar to what I saw that day below. At this point I also received a subliminal message which I
originally thought was God, saying "You will need that cloud later". I now know that message was sent by a mind controller
on this earth who has been targeting me for some time.

That evening we stayed at a Hostel in Bluff, I looked out to the North and could see wave formation of clouds going back as
far as the eye could see, it ended at a singular point in the sky close to where I saw the ionized rainbow earlier that day. 3
days later The 4th largest earthquake struck Christchurch, luckily there were no deaths.

Upon further investigation on my return to Christchurch it revealed that the Unwin SuperDARN Radar was close to the
location. Part of the SuperDARN array, Super Dual Auroral Radar Network evolved in the west during the late Cold War.
Then we had a strange earthquake late one night which was more like a Vertical bounce.

I then started scouring the internet for information about HAARP. I wrote an email to Structural Geologist from Otago
University questioning his article about the earthquakes and their causes. 4 weeks later I was posted on an unusual job to
investigate slump from extraordinary excessive rainfall of someone's front drive in Akaroa.
It became apparent that the front drive I was investigating was the Structural Geologist I had emailed querying manmade
earthquakes 4 weeks prior. Upon meeting him in the drive we discussed the idea, he was having great difficulty he said
writing another article on the subject - I believe secretly suspicious in what I was saying.

The mind controller was able to make people speak, I remember the specific urge to talk words that I did not want to say
when others around me were talking. I kept quiet but found the whole experience odd, eventually working out that it was a
mind controlled event. The probability of me arriving on his front drive with the thousands of houses and EQC claims
available, was mind control - though not apparent to me at that time.

Sometime continued and I carried on investigating man-made earthquakes using HAARP. Eventually convincing myself of
the science behind such an event. It was after trying to raise the alarm at work I came home and had an audible message in
my ears in the room I was in.
Related: What Is This GWEN Tower Really For? + ELF, GWEN Towers, And HAARP Connection

This was around May-July 2012, shortly after a photo appeared on facebook with her looking like she had fallen down some
stairs, however she would not speak to me so I was unable to understand what went on. Naturally intrigued as to what mind
control was I seek answers, it was only now that I began waking up to mind control and the fact that they could both listen to
control the thoughts in your head.

I would be surfing the internet, if I found a website on the subject it would become apparent that it was increasingly difficult
to concentrate. I put together more and more evidence, and was positioning myself to wake up people in Christchurch. It
was shortly after I tried to wake up a work colleague, which I returned home to have an audible message.

Continue reading at: GodElectric

The Entire War On Terror Has Been A Lie - And These Charts Prove It
December 4 2015 | From: GlobalResearch

We were told long ago that the war on terror would make the world a safer place. But after 14
years of permanent warfare, terrorist attacks around the world have escalated by a
staggering 6,500%.
If its objective was to end terrorism, the war on terror has abjectly failed. Since it was launched in 2001, terror
attacks and the number of people killed by them have sky-rocketed:

The above image comes from the Global Terrorism Index 2015, published by the Institute for Economics and Peace. The
same index notes that 78% of all deaths from terrorism last year took place in just five countries: Iraq, Afghanistan, Nigeria,
Pakistan and Syria.

1. Iraq

Iraq takes first place in the index, with a shocking 9,929 terrorist fatalities in 2014 the highest ever recorded in any country.
The chart below (based on figures from the index) clearly shows the surge in terrorist attacks in Iraq starting soon after the
2003 invasion:
2. Afghanistan

In second place is Afghanistan, which became the first target of the war on terror when Operation Enduring
Freedom was launched a few weeks after 9/11. One of the aims of the operation was to stop Afghanistan from becoming a
terrorist haven. Instead, the 14-year intervention has overseen an increase in terrorist incidents of more than 5,000%,
from 30 in 2002 to 1591 in 2014:
3. Nigeria

With a year-on-year increase of more than 300% in terrorist fatalities, Nigeria comes third in the index. Together, Boko
Haram and ISIL were responsible for just over half of all claimed global terrorism fatalities in 2014:

4. Pakistan

Pakistan has seen an increase in terror attacks of more than 4,000% since 2002. Mehdi Hasan notes that, in the 14 years
before 9/11, there was just one suicide attack on Pakistani soil in the 14 years since, there have been 486 suicide
bombings, killing more than 6,000 people.

5. Syria

Syrias civil war began in 2011, which is made clearly visible by the graph. What is not yet clear is whether and how the
year of coalition air strikes will affect the numbers of terrorist incidents.
The War on Terror Creates More War and More Terror

Of the five countries experiencing the most terrorism last year, only Nigeria did not experience either US air strikes or a
military occupation in that year, notes journalist Paul Gottinger in his analysis of global terrorism data.

In some cases, such as Iraq, it is widely acknowledged that Western intervention led to a surge in terrorism; British
intelligence and US government reports have admitted as much (even Tony Blair came close to letting it slip), and al-Qaeda
strategist Abu Musab Al-Suri has celebrated the results:

The war in Iraq almost single-handedly rescued the entire Jihadi movement."

Decades of failed Western interventions have caused extraordinary suffering to the people of Iraq, perhaps killing as many
as 2.9 million people. As Mehdi Hasan points out in the New Statesman: If bombing worked, Iraq would have morphed into
a Scandinavia-style utopia long ago. Instead, the country is in chaos breaking records for terrorist activity while ever
more foreign fighters flood into the country day-by-day.

In other cases, like Syria, the connection is less clear. What is accepted, even by American intelligence agencies is that,
after the deaths of hundreds of civilians and thousands of fighters from coalition bombs, Daesh (Isis) is certainly no weaker
now than it was a year ago; in fact, its fighter ranks may have swelled from 20,000-31,500 to at least 80,000 in the past
year.

The Global Terrorism Index has done a statistical analysis and found two factors to be most closely associated with
terrorism:

These are the levels of political violence committed by the state, and the level of armed conflict within a country.
The report finds that [] 88% of all terrorist attacks between 1989 and 2014 occurred in countries that were
experiencing or involved in violent conflicts."

If theres one thing the war on terror has excelled at, it is creating more war and if there is a second, it is creating more
terror.

On Thursday, David Cameron set out his moral case for launching British airstrikes in Syria, claiming they will make us
safer. But it is abundantly clear that the war on terror has not made us safer. If defeating terrorism is the aim, then we need
to start fighting for creation, not destruction.

New Zealands Homegrown Military-Industrial Complex


December 3 2015 | From: Converge

A weapons conference in New Zealand? This is the slightly shocked response of most people on
the streets in Wellington when we - Peace Action Wellington - are out doing our weekly campaign
information stalls.
Sadly, the answer is yes; the Weapons Conference is a yearly event held in Wellington where 200 weapons and
war-related manufacturers converge for two days of networking and business building.

Related: Wellington Should Not Host Weapons Conference

The Weapons Conference is the public face of an industry which otherwise does not garner much public attention. The
questions we get asked on Cuba Mall are: What is it? Why here in nuclear-free New Zealand? And who are these
companies?

As part of the Peace Action Wellington campaign to shut down the conference, we have begun to gather some answers to
these questions, although much work remains to illuminate the full extent of the industry.

What Is The Weapons Conference?

The Weapons Conference is officially known as the New Zealand Defence Industry Association (NZDIA) Annual
Conference. It is the annual trade gathering of both member companies and other military and weapons-related producers
and suppliers.
The NZDIA is the Government-recognised industry body for the defence sector. It has as its mission:

To create a platform which can be used to establish and enhance Defence Industry supply capabilities, either
individually or in partnership with other members or overseas technology partners, thereby providing the
opportunity to compete successfully for domestic and international defence contracts.

The annual conference is held over two days and includes a large trade show, an address by the Minister of Defence and
workshops that typically cover how to enhance business. It also includes the annual Minister of Defence Awards of
Excellence to Industry.

The conference is sponsored by Lockheed Martin, the worlds largest manufacturer of weapons; its range of products
includes intercontinental ballistic missiles, drones, rocket launchers and fighter jets. In 2014, Lockheed Martins total sales
were US$45.6 billion, approximately one-quarter of New Zealands entire gross domestic product (GDP).

Conference admission is limited to registered participants at a cost of $700 for members and $1400 for non-members.
Significant sponsorship opportunities are also available for companies throughout the conference.

Why A Weapons Conference?

There are essentially two reasons for the New Zealand Weapons Conference. The first is to encourage the NZ government
to spend more money on the military and weaponry. The second is to garner opportunities for companies to sell their
products and services to overseas armies.
There is a frequent refrain from militarists and even those on the Left that New Zealand has relatively low military spending.
At present it is roughly 1% of GDP which translates to $2.4 billion in 2014.

This is not pocket change however you look at it, and, moreover, some recent work has illustrated that such an assumption
is misguided on two accounts.

First, the GDP measure is a percentage, and since GDP steadily rises, it actually means more money in real terms is being
spent on the military each year, despite the percentage remaining stable, or even declining.

The second problem in the assumption that NZ doesnt spend much on its military arises from the countries to which it is
being compared. Typically, NZ is measured against its traditional allies: Australia, the US and UK.
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

But, as Tim Leadbeater illustrates, when measured against the three countries which joined New Zealand in the top four
most peaceful countries, according to the 2014 Global Peace Index put together by the Institute for Economics and Peace,
New Zealand is a relatively big spender. Icelands spending, for example, was .1% in 2012, one-tenth that of NZ.

Needless to say, there is plenty of money to be made in weapons and military-related production in New Zealand. Current
contracts include a $446 million contract to Lockheed Martin for the upgrade of the frigate command systems, and an
undisclosed sum for the replacement of individual firearms for the NZ Defence Forces 8,500 active personnel.

The prevailing view that New Zealand doesnt spend much on the military helps to obscure the opportunity costs of that
military money, money that is desperately needed for our schools, hospitals and housing.

Moreover, the push for more military spending doesnt just come from the companies, but from NZs allies, Canberra,
London and Washington, that increasingly demand the interoperability of NZs defence forces with better-equipped
Australian, British and American troops.

The second reason for the conference and for the industry association more generally, is that it provides support and
encouragement for companies to get involved in international weapons and military-related contracts. Successive New
Zealand governments have embraced weapons and military-related production as a trade diversification strategy.

NZ Trade and Enterprise was a founding member of the NZDIA, and continues to provide financial and trade support. Other
Government agencies such as the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) and Callaghan Innovation have
made sizeable grants to NZDIA members and other military suppliers.
New Zealand-owned companies are supplying military-related exports to Kuwait, Oman, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United
Arab Emirates, Qatar, USA, UK, Australia, Egypt, Lebanon, Singapore, South Korea, and various Pacific Island states.

These products range from mortar-firing command systems to shoot/dont shoot simulation training systems. Transnational
members of the NZDIA (such as Serco, Lockheed and Beca) export to nearly every country on Earth except Russia and
China.

Remeber Serco? They did such a bang-up job with prison privatisation didn't they New Zealand?

Two trends are driving the continued growth in the worlds weapons and military-related trade. On one hand, military
services are being privatised; essential maintenance and engineering services previously done by soldiers are now
contracted out.

This represents a significant growth area for the military-industrial complex.


The largest mercenary army in the world, Blackwater (which keeps changing its name because of bad press) clandestine intelligence services was
sold to the multinational Monsanto. Blackwater was renamed in 2009 after becoming famous in the world with numerous reports of abuses in Iraq,
including massacres of civilians. It remains the largest private contractor of the U.S. Department of State security services, that practices
state terrorism by giving the government the opportunity to deny it.

On the other hand, the relative downturn in spending of the post-Cold War era has receded into a distant memory, and
emerging nation-states (and non-State actors) are rapidly arming and enhancing their military capabilities. Russia and
suppliers from the Global South are seeing significant growth.

War is, as they say, big business.

Both the opportunities for sales to the New Zealand State and to overseas markets are significant. This is why the NZDIA
exists and continues to grow.

Who Are These Companies?

The companies that are involved in weapons and military-related production, supply and export span a huge range of
industries from engineering to clothing to communications and to the weapons themselves. Peace Action Wellington has
adopted the definition of the Network Opposed to Weapons and Related Production to categorise businesses.

Companies or organisations that are involved in the production or supply of:

Weapons or components for weapons systems or their guidance and control systems

Communications equipment, or components for such systems, used by armed forces

Military training equipment, including aircraft used for military training purposes, weapons and combat
simulators, bomb scoring systems and remote detonation systems\

Loading equipment, vehicles, vessels or parts of these for military use

Ammunition, clothing, rations or any other supplies for armed forces

All other products and services for military purposes, including information technology, management, consultancy, logistics,
maintenance and refurbishment of military equipment are defined as being part of weapons & military-related exports
industry.

At present, there are 83 member companies of the NZDIA, but the Australian and New Zealand Defence Directory lists 208
New Zealand suppliers suggesting that there are at least another 125 that do business with the military. There, of course,
may be other companies that are neither members of the NZDIA nor listed in the Directory.
Some of these weapons and military-related companies are New Zealand-owned and operated; many of them are
subsidiaries of transnational corporations. Information about the size and revenue of the industry is difficult to quantify.

The list of companies includes many that are otherwise engaged in supplying civilian products and services so discerning
the specific content of their work which is weapons and military-related is difficult if not impossible since financial reporting
requirements for publicly listed companies is minimal, and for private companies, non-existent.

Similarly, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trades Strategic Goods list, which delineates dual-use items that could be
used in the production of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and some other military hardware/software, has a narrow
scope by comparison with the more comprehensive definition we have adopted.

What Is To Be Done?

There are two broader interconnected issues that arise in opposition to the Weapons Conference. First, if there is a military,
it needs weapons. Therefore, the issue of the Weapons Conference goes to the heart of the military project in New
Zealand.

Does New Zealand need a standing army? The peace movement with a long trajectory back to the First World War would
say no. Contemporary academics and commentators reject the very idea of the Defence Force, instead decrying New
Zealands history of offensive engagement in foreign wars of empire and conquest.
Quite aside from the issue of the necessity or otherwise of the NZ Defence Force, the State-sponsored support of a
homegrown military-industrial complex, one that seeks to capitalise on military spending elsewhere seems deeply
problematic and abhorrent, if not actually illegal.

The idea that a country whose political elite prides itself on being a good international citizen and where law expressly
prohibits nuclear weapons should then be an enthusiastic cheerleader (and funder) for war industries is absurd in the
extreme.

While serious questioning about the existence of the military is not on the table at present given its ubiquitous Parliamentary
support and absence of a sustained peace movement, when the issue is raised, there is widespread public disquiet about a
homegrown military-industrial complex especially one that seeks growth through sales to repressive regimes.

Syria: before and after

It does not take much for people to see the connection between the horrors being wrought on the peoples of Syria, Iraq,
Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen and the exponential profits of the worlds weapons manufacturers.

New Zealand is in a good position to reconsider the ethical dimension of supplying weapons and military-related products to
the worlds armies. It will take a committed peace movement to make that a reality.

Donald Sutherland Explains The Real Meaning Of 'The Hunger Games' And Why Its
Message Must Be Understood
December 1 2015 | From: TheFreeThoughtProject

There are some inside Hollywood, who are trying to wake up the world - Donald Sutherland is one
of them.

Hollywood actor, Donald Sutherland just dropped a bombshell on the military industrial complex. Sutherland, who
plays President Coriolanus Snow in the blockbuster movie series Hunger Games, was recently asked what the
movie was really about he held no punches in his answer.

The young people who see this film must recognize that for the future blind faith in their leaders, as Bruce
Springsteen said, will get you dead.'

Comment: It is interesting to note that the family 'Sutherland' is listed as one of the top 300 family bloodlines of the
Illuminati. However this does not mean that Donald is Illuminati, although his significance in the enterainment industry is
curious.

The point is though, that just because a person has the surname of an Illuminati bloodline family does not necessarily mean
that any such particular individual is "Illuminati".

My family name is on that same list also, and while I know there are some in my family line that are "Illuminati", I most
certainly am not.

Sutherland continued:

If theres any question as to what its an allegory for I will tell you.

It is the powers that be in the United States of America. Its profiteers.

War is for profit. Its not to save the world for democracy or for king and country.
No, bulls**t.

Its for the profit of the top 10%, and the young people who see this film must recognize that for the future
blind faith in their leaders, as Bruce Springsteen said, will get you dead.

Those who are awake to the war machine, and have watched the movies or read the books, have undoubtedly seen the
underlying anti-establishment theme within. However, those who do not notice it should heed Sutherlands words.

It is no question that war is for the profit of very few people. In fact, as the famous, two-time Medal of Honor recipient, Major
General Smedley Butler of the USMC said;

WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope.
It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a
small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the
very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.

In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and
billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in
their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.

How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew
what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights,
ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy?
How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?"

Sutherland does get one thing wrong, however, and that is the percentage that he assigns to those who profit from war. It is
nowhere near 10% as he states. Those who profit from war, as Smedley Butler points out above, are a tiny group of people.
The ruling elite.

Its the weapons manufacturers, the arms dealers, the inside politicians, and the state itself. Everyone else involved in war,
including those who die for it, are merely pawns. They are cogs in the machine whose only purpose is to spread death and
destruction.

Please share this article and video so that others, who may have missed the point of this movie series, may see its true
purpose calling out the elite for the criminals that they are.

False Flag Attacks, Fake Terrorism & Engineered Wars

Part 1: Click here

Part 2: Click here

Part 3: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/false-flag-engineered-wars-2.shtml
False Flag Attacks, Fake Terrorism & Engineered Wars

Part 1: Click here

Part 2: Click here

Part 3: Click here

Netanyahu Admits ISIS Are Israeli Soldiers


November 30 2015 | From: PressTV

Netanyahu to punish Syrians who attacked ISIL terrorists

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has pledged to punish a group of Syrian Druze individuals in the
occupied Golan Heights who attacked injured ISIL Takfiri militants en route to a hospital in Israel.

We will not allow anyone to take the law into their own hands. We will not allow anyone to disrupt Israeli soldiers
in their missions, Netanyahu said on Tuesday.
He called the incident very serious and said those behind it would be located and held to account.

Meanwhile, Israeli Minister for Military Affairs Moshe Yaalon has also pledged to track down the Druze individuals. We
wont be able to ignore it, and law enforcement authorities will deal with it heavy-handedly, he said in a statement.

Reports say Israeli police made several arrest from the Druze community on Wednesday.

Around 200 people from the Druze community in the town of Majdal Shams, which lies in the southern foothills of Mount
Hermon and north of the Golan Heights, pelted an Israeli military ambulance with stones on Monday night, forcing it to stop.

The Druze individuals then dragged two wounded ISIL extremists out of the vehicle and beat them up. One of the injured
militants died afterwards, while the second is in a serious condition. An Israeli soldier and an officer onboard the vehicle also
sustained slight wounds as a result of the assault.

The photo shows the Israeli military ambulance that was carrying ISIL Takfiri terrorists, which came under attack in the occupied Golan Heights on
June 22, 2015.

On May 23, a Takfiri terrorist wounded during fierce clashes with Syrian government forces was transferred to the Baruch
Padeh Medical Center in the northern Israeli settlement of Poriya, located approximately 6 kilometers (3.7 miles) south of
the coastal Israeli city of Tiberias, and received medical treatment there.

According to the documents from Israeli hospitals, until last September, Israels military had spent USD 10 million for the
treatment of the terrorists injured in fighting with Syrian government forces.

The documents further revealed that a total of 398 injured militants had also been treated at Galil Hospital in Israels
northern coastal city of Nahariya in the past couple of years. Another hospital in the city of Safed had provided treatment for
hundreds of other Takfiri terrorists.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visits a militant wounded in Syria at a field hospital in northern Israel, February 18, 2014.

Damascus says Tel Aviv and its Western and regional allies are aiding the Takfiri militant groups operating inside Syria.

The Syrian army has seized huge quantities of Israeli-made weapons and advanced military equipment from the foreign-
backed militants inside Syria on numerous occasions.

Syria has been grappling with a deadly crisis since March 2011. The violence fueled by Takfiri groups has so far claimed the
lives of more than 230,000 people, including almost 11,500 children, according to reports.

What You're Not Being Told About Booz Allen Hamilton And Edward Snowden
November 30 2015 | From: Truthloader

Edward Snowden didn't actually work for the NSA, he worked for a contractor called Booz Allen
Hamilton.
How did it come to be that Snowden, working for a private company, was able to leak information about a top
secret surveillance program?

Truthloader is a channel dedicated to citizen journalism. We find the best examples of crowd-sourced video and
independent content, then use our expertise to add context and analysis. We respond to the stories you're interested in, so if
you've got a story you'd love us to get to the bottom of, tweet us, Facebook us, or respond to our videos with a comment -
and perhaps check out our reddit.

John Kerry Admits They're Making 'Order Out Of Chaos' For 'World Order'
November 29 2015 | From: TruthStreamMedia / Channel4

John Kerry just told everyone exactly what the true goals are in the Middle East. They are creating
chaos [See "Ordo Ab Chao" for context below] to bring order to it, their order, a "world order". It
doesn't get any more blatant than this.
The US Secretary of State told Channel 4 News that the crisis gripping Europe is a human catastrophe but cannot
be solved by taking in people.

In an exclusive interview, he told Jon Snow that the US and Russia shared the same goal in "ridding the region of Isil" and
that the problem was President Assad acting as a "magnet" for foreign fighters in the region.

See the full interview here.

Order Out Of Chaos: Order Ab Chao

From: GnosticWarrior / Various


Order Ab Chao is Latin for "Order Out of Chaos or Order from Disorder." This term was invented by Freemasons and is the
actual motto of the 33rd Degree of Scottish Rite Freemasonry.

Secret Societies have a great motto Ordo Ab Chao meaning Order Out of Chaos. Agendas are formulated
designed to give the powerful more power. Chaos is created, and media blitzed. Then cries go out for solution.
Laws are passed which could never have been passed without the chaos. The order, has reigned through
deception of the masses, and the agenda is accomplished.

- James Arthur, Mushrooms and Mankind (38)

The Latin inscription on the banner around the Judaic eagle's head (below the Star of David) E Pluribus Unum
("From the Many the One") In other words, first they combined all the ancient stellar cults, now theyre going to
combine the worlds governments, militaries, currencies, banks.

- Michael Tsarion, Astrotheology and Sidereal Mythology

The name Scottish or Scotland is derived from the Latin, from Greek skotia, from feminine of skotios, dark, shadowy (from
the shadow it casts), from skotos, darkness.

In ancient Egypt there was a temple of Venus Scotia and it is said that the country of Scotland had derived its name from an
Egyptian Pharaoh Queen named Scota.
Ordo ab Chao or Order out of Chaos - A motto of the Thirty-third Degree, and having the same allusion as lux e
tenebris, which see.

The invention of this motto is to be attributed to the Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite at
Charleston, and it is first met with in the Patent of Count de Grasse, dated February 1, 1802.

When De Grasse afterward carried the Rite over to France and established a Supreme Council there, he changed
the motto, and, according to Lenning, Ordo ab hoc was used by him and his Council in all the documents issued by
them. If so, it was simply a blunder.

The chaos (CHAO) is the society we see around us today and it is the builders who influence the leaders to manufacture
this chaos so that they can conceal their creations in darkness while they work towards the light (ORDO). Without chaos
there would never be order.

Without darkness, there can be no light and without light there can be no darkness. What is the AS ABOVE, is the SO
BELOW of this Secret Brotherhood.
The Grand Architects of CHAO (hell or illusion) become the masters of ORDO (Heaven on earth). The torch bearers who
carry the light in the dark will now be the light bearers who usher in the new dawn of a new day.

FIAT LUX (Let there be light). What was once dark, now becomes light and what was once light now becomes dark.
Here is a generic description of ORDO AB CHAO in, "An encyclopdia of freemasonry and its kindred sciences - Volume 2"
by 33rd Degree Freemason Albert Gallatin Mackey, and William James Hughan.

"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think were being run by maniacs for manical ends and
I think Im liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. Thats whats insane about it.

- John Lennon

Drudge Sends The Biggest Secret Viral: America Has Been Arming ISIS
November 28 2015 | From: SHTFplan

The biggest open secret in the world has just been tweeted by the worlds biggest news
aggregator.
Matt Drudge drives so much web traffic that he basically has his own gravity, and now the often-reclusive figure
has sent out a message that should be a wake-up call for those who have been broadcasting news about the threat
that ISIS poses.

Following their mass murder spree in Paris, the terrorist group is supposedly planning attacking inside America, all while
taking supposedly also taking on the biggest military powers in the world during their protracted struggle for an Islamic State
caliphate inside Syria and Iraq.

What would the world do if it realized the truth that ISIS is the creation of Western forces, and that the United States has in
fact been arming and supporting their own worst enemy?:

A shocking truth is unfolding: America has been arming ISIS

- MATT DRUDGE (@DRUDGE) November 24, 2015

This bombshell tweet echoes numerous reports from inside the alternative media pointing out the sick truth behind the
shocking resurgence of terrorism.

Barry Donegan of Truth in Media wrote:

"Influential conservative news aggregator Matt Drudge issued a tweet on Tuesday acknowledging the growing
body of evidence that suggests that the U.S. has participated in arming the terror group ISIS.
Drudges realization follows nearly two years of Truth in Media coverage of how U.S. foreign policy is enabling
terrorism in Syria and Iraq and has led to the rise of ISIS.

In September of 2013, Ben Swann reported on how U.S. efforts to arm radical Islamist rebel groups against
secular Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad were empowering extremists who were planning to create what he
described at the time as an al-Qaeda super state, comprised of Iraq and Syria.

In addition to numerous data points hinting at the U.S. support for terrorists in order to undermine and destabilize Bashar al-
Assad, an important memo has come to the surface.

The declassified Pentagon/Defense Intelligence Agency memo from 2012 [see PDF] reveals that Turkey as well as the
Western and Arab states who are overtly backing the Free Syrian Army rebels have also been sponsoring a burgeoning
Islamic State that stands to take over Syria and Iraq for the interests of the Sunni Muslim factions that dominate much of the
Middle East and who oppose Shiite Muslim strongholds at all costs.

The document should be world news, but has failed to gain headlines and major coverage in any mainstream media news
outlets. Perhaps with Drudges fresh spotlighting of the important issue, some Americans will understand how their leaders
have been breathing life into the ISIS monster, and that this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want

Here is one of Ben Swanns reports on the secret behind ISIS and their sponsors:

Censorship Shock: Amazon.com Bans Investigative Book Nobody Died At Sandy


Hook Because It Disagrees With Government Version Of What Happened
November 28 2015 | From: NaturalNews

In a stunning demonstration of online book burning, Amazon.com has just banned a book because
of its contents.

The book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook consists of analysis from a dozen contributor authors, and its edited by Jim
Fetzer, Ph.D. The book concludes that Sandy Hook was a staged FEMA drill carried out by the government to push
an agenda of nationwide gun control.

Use hashtag #StopAmazonCensorship to Tweet this story.

We have a full download of the book below in PDF form, so keep reading if you want to find out what's so "dangerous" about
this book that Amazon had to ban it...

Whether the authors' conclusions are well-founded or complete lunacy isn't the point here. Amazon.com has selectively
targeted this book for censorship due to the political incorrectness of the author's conclusions.

Remember, Amazon.com went out of its way to ban Confederate flags in the aftermath of another shooting, enforcing a
grotesque, almost Stalinist political correctness in its decision to pull Confederate flag merchandise from its online store
(including children's toys like the General Lee car from Dukes of Hazzard).
Yet at the same time, Amazon sells tens of thousands of books asserting all sorts of bizarre things, from authors who
believe the Earth is literally flat to Adolf Hitler's pro-genocidal Mein Kampf.

"If you Disagree with the Government, Amazon can Pull your Book..."

Amazon's banning of Fetzer's book is a dangerous precedent of banning books based on their non-conformity with political
correctness. "Amazon gave me no reason," Fetzer told Natural News.

The situation is completely absurd... if you disagree with a government version of anything, Amazon can pull your
book."

This brings up the possibility that Amazon might soon ban U.S. history books that show the country's Founding Fathers in a
positive light, for example. Will books on Thomas Jefferson soon be memory holed by the Amazon Ministry of Truth?

What about books that question the cancer industry or Monsanto's GMOs? Notably, Jeff Bezos is both the founder of
Amazon.com and the owner of the Washington Post, a highly politicized paper whose "science" writers parrot Monsanto
talking points with absolute obedience.

On Fetzer's blog, he further explains that Amazon.com had already accepted his book for publication, then reversed its
position when sales began to take off:

Create Space and amazon.com review every submission for its suitability for publication and conformity to their
guidelines before they are accepted for publication. They accepted and published NOBODY DIED AT SANDY
HOOK on 22 October 2015, nearly a month ago.

There is no good reason for this book to now be taken down for further review other than that it has become a
sensation and has the potential to embarrass the administration of President Barack Hussein Obama, which
appears to be the underlying problem.

Click here to search GoodGopher.com for "Sandy Hook." Good Gopher is the indy media search engine I created as an
alternative to the Google censorship now experienced by nearly everyone across the independent media.

What's so Dangerous About a Book that most Americans think is Complete Fiction Anyway?

According to Amazon.com, selling a pro-genocide book by Adolf Hitler seems perfectly acceptable, yet something in Jim
Fetzer's "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook" is so incredibly offensive (or dangerous) that it must be banned at all costs.

It begs the obvious question: What is so dangerous about Fetzer's book that Amazon.com must banish it from retail?

Perhaps 90% of Americans would take one look at the title and consider the book to be a complete joke from the start.
They'd call it "loony conspiracy theory" material and wouldn't give it a second thought. So why bother banning it? Or is the
book so compelling that it runs the risk of making "believers" out of former skeptics?

If "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook" is filled with complete nonsense, then why risk making it a sensation from the censorship
angle alone? (See the latest indy media headlines on censorship at Censorship.news.)

Amazon.com sells all sorts of books filled with complete nonsense, including the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5. If a book's factual basis is the determining factor for whether it should be carried by the
online retailer, then half of Amazon.com's inventory must now be reviewed and possibly pulled.

Clearly, something in "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook" has the powers that be so frightened that they are desperately trying to
memory hole the book.

What if Sandy Hook were Totally Staged?

I haven't read the book, and school shootings are not my investigative focus, so I'm not yet informed enough to make any
conclusive statements on this topic. But my curiosity is raised, and there are some things we already know about the
fraud of staged news events and political events taking place right now.

For example, we know the mainstream media is largely fake and staged. We know CNN uses "crisis actors" and that a
few of these crisis actors were also on location at the Sandy Hook event, crying on cue and playing out their roles for the TV
cameras (see the video links below).
We also know that some of these same crisis actors appear multiple times on camera at different staged events such as the
Boston Bombing and the Umpqua Community College shooting.

See the following videos for examples of footage on these "crisis actors." (I can't vouch for the authenticity of all these
videos, by the way. This is just a sampling of what's out there on this topic...)

Same crisis actor at Sandy Hook and Boston Bombing

Sandy Hook crisis actors read cue cards for the cameras

Crisis actors busted: Fake Sandy Hook eyewitness

Sandy Hook hoax and lies

And this one from just six days ago: Sandy Hook crisis actors pose as Paris attack victims!

We also know for a fact that Sandy Hook was seized upon by gun control opponents in an attempt to destroy the Second
Amendment rights of all Americans. The crisis appears to have been ready made for precisely such a political push,
complete with the imagery of children's bodies and sobbing parents which, according to Fetzer, was nothing more than
elaborate theater.

That's the basis of his book, after all: That the entire "shooting" was staged as a drill. Nobody really died at Sandy Hook, he
says, and a quick glance at his book definitely raises some interesting questions.

5-Star Ratings from Amazon.com Readers... Soo Why was it Banned?

As the screen shot shows below, this book was receiving 5-star reviews from Amazon readers. (h/t to Rense.com for the
screen shot.)
And you can click here for a cached image proving the book was being sold on Amazon.

If readers were loving the book -- and even if they weren't -- why would Amazon.com pull it from retail?

Download the Book here and View for Yourself

We have permission from the author to post the full copy of this book as a PDF.

Click this link to download the entire book (PDF).

We're also interviewing Fetzer and will be posting the interview on TalkNetwork.com tomorrow, during the Health Ranger
Report show which airs at 11am Pacific / 2pm Eastern. Listen in at TalkNetwork.com.
Censoring Unpopular Thought

Amazon's censorship effort should be disturbing to all of us, regardless of whether we agree or disagree with the
conclusions of the author of this banned book.

By banning this book because of its speech, Amazon.com now believes it has a right to determine "truth" in books and
ban those books that contradict the company's opinions on current events.

Amazon.com, in other words, has just become your Big Brother, and it's going to decide what you can and cannot read. To
me, that's far more alarming than anything we might find in the pages of "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook," regardless of
whether it's truth or fiction.
If Amazon.com is now the arbiter of what kind of political information you're allowed to read, then we're already deep into the
corporatocracy of a police state society... and it all gives even more credence to the possibility that Fetzer's book rings true
with an increasing number of Americans who are waking up to what's really happening.

Paris-Syria Timeline Of Terror


November 20 2015 | From: PeterDrew

On November 13th, 2015 Paris was hit by a deadly terrorist attack. Western governments and
Western media informed the world almost immediately who had committed the attacks, where they
had emanated from, and what the required response needed to be.

The world was told that the attacks were committed by 8 Islamic extremists representing ISIL, and that Syria was
the location of the hub of this problem. President Hollande told the world that France was at war, and within just
one day of the attacks the world was informed that bombing raids of Syria would begin.

Prior to the events of November 13th, the bombing of Syria would have been illegal under international law, except for
Russia who had recently been asked by the Syrian government to provide military support to fight what they have said are al
Qaeda/ISIL terrorists attempting to overthrow the government.

The Western media strongly laid out the case for the Paris attacks being the result of an ideological and religious clash of
cultures between radical Muslims and everyone else. The world needed to prepare for more of the same anywhere and
everywhere. This message has been pushed out to the world in mass production ever since by Western governments and
Western media.

But are we being told the truth on this? Who really is ISIL? How did they suddenly become such an influential force in the
world, and what is the Western militarys real association with ISIL and other terrorist or rebel groups in Syria? What links
did French intelligence have with the alleged ISIL attackers in Paris, and did they know an attack was coming?

Were the Paris attacks actually allowed to occur by Western intelligence agencies, or even worse, were they in fact a false
flag attack under the direction of Western intelligence agencies as part of a much bigger geo-political picture that we are not
being told about?

The timeline below does not answer all of these questions, but it does help to paint a much bigger picture around
these events, and does help to paint a quite different picture to what our Western governments and Western media
have been telling us:

Sept 2000: PNAC (Project for a New American Century), a major Washington think tank, documents its intention for
driving through regime change and taking control of 7 specific countries in the Middle East over the next few years, including
Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Lebanon, and Iran.
Dec 2001: 4-Star General Wesley Clarke visits the Pentagon and is shown an internal memo outlining the US militarys
plans to overthrow 7 Middle East countries over the next few years (the same 7 countries as highlighted in the PNAC
report). In 2007 General Clarke will make a public announcement about seeing these plans and his shock at what they
contained.

2002: Afghanistan is invaded and regime change implemented.

2003: Iraq is invaded and regime change implemented (President executed) on the back of now officially acknowledged
fraudulent intelligence reports about alleged weapons of mass destruction and deliberate deception of the public.
2003-2015: More than one million innocent civilians are killed in Iraq.

2011: Libya bombed to destruction by the US military (in breach of international law) and regime change is achieved
(President executed).

2011: Western governments and the western media report that the Syrian government is murdering its own citizens and
that so called rebel forces are rising up against the Syrian government in protest. No evidence is provided to support these
claims.

2011: Western intelligence agencies begin covertly arming, funding and training the so called Syrian rebels (while this is
denied by Western governments at the time, in 2015 this will be confirmed through the release of de-classified US defence
documents).

In 2015 it will also be confirmed that the rebel fighters that are being armed, funded, and trained by the West are in fact
affiliates of al Qaeda who the US military had previously been fighting against in Iraq and who supposedly were responsible
for 9/11. But now the US and Western military are working together in partnership with these extremist terrorist groups.
2011-12: Despite the Syrian rebels (al Qaeda affiliates) being armed, funded, and trained by Western intelligence
agencies, the Syrian military has successfully kept them at bay, although at the cost of tens of thousands of innocent Syrian
lives killed by the Syrian rebels (al Qaeda affiliates).

2013: Western governments and Western media accuse the Syrian government of using chemical weapons against their
own citizens. A United Nations investigation later confirms that the chemical weapons were in fact not used by the Syrian
government and were in fact more likely to have been used by the Syrian rebels/al Qaeda.

Sept 2013: On the back of the alleged chemical weapons attacks by the Syrian government, President Obama and Prime
Minister Cameron take recommendations to US Congress and UK Parliament to begin a major bombing campaign to
supposedly protect the Syrian people from their own government.

In events that are almost unprecedented in history, the UK Parliament votes down David Camerons recommendation for
bombing Syria. US Congress subsequently does the same.
Jan 2014: Just 4 months after the historic NO BOMBING VOTE, and seemingly from out of nowhere, Western military and
Western media begin reporting the emergence of a new Islamic extremist group in Syria and Iraq which is described as
having huge numbers, huge financial and military resources, and is described as a grave threat to the entire Western world.
It is given the name ISIL.

2014: US Congress and UK Parliament informally raise the issue of a need to conduct bombing raids in Syria in order to
tackle the rising threat of ISIL. It is clear that there is not the public or political support to formally take this recommendation
to Congress and Parliament and risk being voted down a second time on bombing Syria.

2014: A United Nations investigation into the alleged chemical weapons attack by the Syrian government found that the
attack was instead more likely to have come from the al Qaeda affiliated Syrian rebels, thus seriously calling into question
the entire case for military action and requested bombing campaigns against the Syrian government (Iraq weapons of mass
destruction all over again).

2014-15: Many countries, including Russia, now begin supporting Syrian President Assads plea to the rest of the world to
support them in their desperate fight against the terrorist extremists (al Qaeda/ISIL) who are attacking them using weapons,
training, and support from Western military and Western intelligence (now confirmed in de-classified documents).

Sept 2015: President Putin addresses the United Nations and asks why Western military and Western intelligence have
supported the rise of Islamic extremists in Syria and Iraq in an effort to overthrow the Syrian government. He declares that
Russia is going to draw a line in the sand and take a stance on this issue.

Sept 2015: The President of Syria formally requests military assistance from Russia to help in the fight against the
Western backed al Qaeda/ISIL affiliated rebels.

Oct 2015: On President Putins orders, Russia launches a mass bombing campaign against al Qaeda/ISIL strongholds in
Syria and within three days has seriously compromised their capacity and casts serious questions about why the entire
weaponry and intelligence of the Western military had been unable to achieve any meaningful impact on ISIL over the
preceding nearly 2 years.
Russia has now taken the controlling military role in Syria in support of the Syrian government, a situation that is a huge
embarrassment for the Western military and Western governments.

Oct 2015: A Russian airliner is brought down in a terrorist attack. Although Western intelligence states that ISIL have
claimed responsibility, many military experts make counter claims that this would have been impossible to achieve by ISIL.
This opens up the unconfirmed discussion and suggestions of a possible Western backed false flag attack against Russia.

Nov 13, 2015: Paris is hit by a massive terrorist attack.

Nov 14, 2015: Within just hours of the attack, and before detailed investigations and analysis can be properly conducted,
Western governments and Western media are reporting that they know exactly who committed the crime and exactly where
the problem emanated from ie. Syria.
Nov 15, 2015: Western military begins mass bombing raids on Syria. Prior to the events of November 13th, these bombing
raids in Syria would have been illegal under international law, but with President Hollande immediately stating to the world
that France was at war, they deemed the bombing raids of Syria to now be a matter of self-defence under international law.

So this was now the third different type of justification put forward in the last two years by Western governments for bombing
Syria;

1. In retaliation of alleged chemical weapon attacks (which was proven false),

2. To help defeat ISIL because they were killing people in the Middle East (ISIL are now confirmed to be fully supported by
Western military and intelligence), 3. To help defeat ISIL in self defence against ISIL terrorist attacks in Europe.

Nov 14 2015: Evidence emerges of French intelligence being aware that a terrorist attack was imminent and that they
were aware of and familiar with at least some of the alleged ISIL terrorists in the Paris attacks.

2016? The Syrian government is overthrown and/or President Assad assassinated or executed? Washingtons PNAC plan
from 2000 achieves the second last of its list of 7 countries (only Iran remaining) for regime change and control. Like
Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, Syria becomes a nation of complete carnage, death, and destruction.

OR

2016? Russia and other nations continue to make a stand and support the Syrian government leading to dramatically
escalating global tensions and significant steps towards World War 3.

OR
2016? The people of the Western world and the rest of the world stand up in mass against PNACs plans for total
destabilisation and takeover of the Middle East, refuse to support further Western backed death and destruction in the
Middle East, and refuse to engage in divisive hatred between Muslims and non-Muslims.

While exactly who did what and how in the Paris attacks is still very much uncertain, we can say with absolute certainty now
that ISIL, whatever that group really is, has been armed and trained by Western military and Western intelligence.

We can say with certainty that back in 2,000 there were plans put in place for the United States military and their Western
affiliates to take down 7 specific Middle East countries, including Syria.

We can say for certain that certain events have been manipulated and falsely reported to try to create a justification for
Western military action against Syria. We can say for certain that multiple failed efforts have been put forward by Western
governments to justify bombing and military action against Syria.

Finally, we can say for certain that up until November 13th, 2015, all of those attempts to justify bombing and military action
against Syria had been unsuccessful and were illegal under international law, but within one day of the attacks in Paris, the
Western bombing of Syria had finally commenced.

The First Question To Ask After Any Terror Attack: Was It A False Flag?
November 19 2015 | From: WashingtonsBlog

Presidents, Prime Ministers, Congressmen, Generals, Spooks, Soldiers and Police ADMIT to False
Flag Terror.

Related: Putin Put the G20 on Notice: We know you are financing Islamic State
In the following instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an
attack) admit to it, either orally, in writing, or through photographs or videos:

Related: Hollande, Cameron Selling We are at War with ISIS After Ignoring Global Intel Before Terror Attack

1. Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an
invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the Mukden Incident or the Manchurian Incident.
The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking
Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the
Incident was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army . And see this.

2. A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that under orders from the chief of the Gestapo he and
some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the
invasion of Poland.

3. Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting
fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.
4. Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Unions Red Army shelled the Russian village of
Mainila in 1939 while blaming the attack on Finland as a basis for launching the Winter War against Finland. Russian
president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.

5. The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet
leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and then falsely
blamed it on the Nazis.
6. The British government admits that between 1946 and 1948 it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the
Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called Defenders of Arab Palestine, and then had the psuedo-
group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see this, this and this).

7. Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S.
diplomatic facilities, then left behind evidence implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated
prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and
see this and this).

8. The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950's to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn
the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.
9. The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate
in Greece also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey and blamed it on Greece, for the
purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.

10. The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower
approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime
change.
11. The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO,
with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and
blamed the communists, in order to rally peoples support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.

As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated:

You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any
political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn
to the state to ask for greater security

(and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings
occurred).
And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece,
the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.

False flag attacks carried out pursuant to this program include by way of example only:

The murder of the Turkish Prime Minister (1960)

Bombings in Portugal (1966)

The Piazza Fontana massacre in Italy (1969)

Terror attacks in Turkey (1971)

The Peteano bombing in Italy (1972)

Shootings in Brescia, Italy and a bombing on an Italian train (1974)

Shootings in Istanbul, Turkey (1977)

The Atocha massacre in Madrid, Spain (1977)

The abduction and murder of the Italian Prime Minister (1978)

The bombing of the Bologna railway station in Italy (1980)

Shooting and killing 28 shoppers in Brabant county, Belgium (1985)

12. In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch a false attack made on Guantanamo
Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and
[overthrow Castro].
13. Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level
officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans
were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

14. As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of
Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes),
and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of
Cuba.
See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington
Investigative Producer for ABCs World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

15. In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of
American States such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

16. The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the
United States:

The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castros subordinate commanders to
initiate an attack on Guantanamo.

17. The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 manipulating data to
make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

18. A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that as part of its Cointelpro campaign the FBI had used many
provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

19. A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on
their enemy. He explained:
In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We
did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque. In response to the surprised correspondents incredulous look
the general said, I am giving an example.

20. A declassified 1973 CIA document reveals a program to train foreign police and troops on how to make booby traps,
pretending that they were training them on how to investigate terrorist acts:

The Agency maintains liaison in varying degrees with foreign police/security organizations through its field stations
.

[CIA provides training sessions as follows:]

a. Providing trainees with basic knowledge in the uses of commercial and military demolitions and
incendiaries as they may be applied in terrorism and industrial sabotage operations.

b. Introducing the trainees to commercially available materials and home laboratory techniques, likely to he
used in the manufacture of explosives and incendiaries by terrorists or saboteurs.

c. Familiarizing the trainees with the concept of target analysis and operational planning that a saboteur or
terrorist must employ.

d. Introducing the trainees to booby trapping devices and techniques giving practical experience with both
manufactured and improvised devices through actual fabrication.

***

The program provides the trainees with ample opportunity to develop basic familiarity and use proficiently
through handling, preparing and applying the various explosive charges, incendiary agents, terrorist
devices and sabotage techniques.

21. The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the
outer wall of a prison and planted escape tools on a prisoner a member of the Red Army Faction which the secret
service wished to frame the bombing on.

22. A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffis compound in Tripoli, Libya
which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald
Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.
23. The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch
of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him:

"To participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the
police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.

24. An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently
massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-
Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).

25. The United States Armys 1994 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and
Procedures for Special Forces updated in 2004 recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to
destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as
part of the CIAs Dirty Wars. And see this.

26. Similarly, a CIA psychological operations manual prepared by a CIA contractor for the Nicaraguan Contra
rebels noted the value of assassinating someone on your own side to create a martyr for the cause.
The manual was authenticated by the U.S. government. The manual received so much publicity from Associated Press,
Washington Post and other news coverage that during the 1984 presidential debate President Reagan
was confronted with the following on national television:

"At this moment, we are confronted with the extraordinary story of a CIA guerrilla manual for the anti-Sandinista
contras whom we are backing, which advocates not only assassinations of Sandinistas but the hiring of criminals
to assassinate the guerrillas we are supporting in order to create martyrs."

27. An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that elements of the
military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked.

28. Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in
1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this
discussion).
29. As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government
murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate
Macedonian police, in order to join the war on terror.

30. At the July 2001 G8 Summit in Genoa, Italy, black-clad thugs were videotaped getting out of police cars, and
were seen by an Italian MP carrying iron bars inside the police station. Subsequently, senior police officials in
Genoa admitted that police planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer at the G8 Summit, in
order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.

31. The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks as shown by a memo from the defense secretary
as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war.
Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is
overwhelming that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Husseins regime, that Cheney probably had information
unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not doing their homework in reporting such ties.

Related: 9/11 False Flag Conspiracy - Finally Solved (Names, Connections, Motives)

Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil not 9/11 or weapons of mass
destruction. Despite previous lone wolf claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored
terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers.
Related: The Connection Between 9/11, JFK And The Global Collateral Accounts

(Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government; but such a
claim is beyond the scope of this discussion. The key point is that the U.S. falsely blamed it on Iraq, when it knew Iraq
had nothing to do with it.).

32.) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government
scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government
officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.
33. According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in
Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist
organization.

34. The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali
bombings.

35. Police outside of a 2003 European Union summit in Greece were filmed planting Molotov cocktails on a peaceful
protester

36. Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-
Qaeda, having our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment
centers, training camps, and fundraising operations.
It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-
Qaedas ranks, causing operatives to doubt others identities and to question the validity of communications.

37. Similarly, in 2005, Professor John Arquilla of the Naval Postgraduate School a renowned US defense analyst
credited with developing the concept of netwar called for western intelligence services to create new pseudo gang
terrorist groups, as a way of undermining real terror networks.

According to Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, Arquillas pseudo-gang strategy was, Hersh
reported, already being implemented by the Pentagon:

Under Rumsfelds new approach, I was told, US military operatives would be permitted to pose abroad as corrupt
foreign businessmen seeking to buy contraband items that could be used in nuclear-weapons systems. In some
cases, according to the Pentagon advisers, local citizens could be recruited and asked to join up with
guerrillas or terrorists

The new rules will enable the Special Forces community to set up what it calls action teams in the target countries
overseas which can be used to find and eliminate terrorist organizations.

Do you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador? the former high-level intelligence
official asked me, referring to the military-led gangs that committed atrocities in the early nineteen-
eighties. We founded them and we financed them, he said.

The objective now is to recruit locals in any area we want. And we arent going to tell Congress about it.
A former military officer, who has knowledge of the Pentagons commando capabilities, said, Were going
to be riding with the bad boys.

38. United Press International reported in June 2005:

"U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92
pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been
physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers.

Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or
terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either
Mossad or the CIA.

Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use
insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance".

39. Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on
Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.
40. Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec
police officers (and see this).

41. A 2008 US Army special operations field manual recommends that the U.S. military use surrogate non-state groups
such as paramilitary forces, individuals, businesses, foreign political organizations, resistant or insurgent organizations,
expatriates, transnational terrorism adversaries, disillusioned transnational terrorism members, black marketers, and
other social or political undesirables.
The manual specifically acknowledged that U.S. special operations can involve both counterterrorism and Terrorism (as
well as transnational criminal activities, including narco-trafficking, illicit arms-dealing, and illegal financial transactions.)

42. The former head of Secret Services and Head of State of Italy (Francesco Cossiga) advised the 2008 minister in
charge of the police, on how to deal with protests from teachers and students:

"He should do what I did when I was Minister of the Interior infiltrate the movement with agents provocateurs
inclined to do anything . And after that, with the strength of the gained population consent, beat them for
blood and beat for blood also those teachers that incite them.

Especially the teachers. Not the elderly, of course, but the girl teachers yes".

43. At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to
incite the crowd to violence.

44. Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to
try to discredit the protesters.

45. Rioters who discredited the peaceful protests against the swearing in of the Mexican president in 2012 admitted that
they were paid 300 pesos each to destroy everything in their path. According to Wikipedia, photos also show the vandals
waiting in groups behind police lines prior to the violence.
46. A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed
they were rebels killed in combat.

47. On November 20, 2014, Mexican agent provocateurs were transported by army vehicles to participate in the 2014
Iguala mass kidnapping protests, as was shown by videos and pictures distributed via social networks.

48. The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence
Prince Bandar recently admitted that the Saudi government controls Chechen terrorists.
49. High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government a fellow NATO country carried out the chemical
weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry
out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.

50. The Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to
frame others. Ukrainian officials admit that the Ukrainian snipers fired on both sides, to create maximum chaos.

51. Britains spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out digital false flag attacks on targets, framing
people by writing offensive or unlawful material and blaming it on the target.

52. U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then drop automatic weapons near their
body so they can pretend they were militants

53. Similarly, police frame innocent people for crimes they didnt commit. The practice is so well-known that the New York
Times noted in 1981:

In police jargon, a throwdown is a weapon planted on a victim.

Newsweek reported in 1999:


"Perez, himself a former [Los Angeles Police Department] cop, was caught stealing eight pounds of cocaine from
police evidence lockers. After pleading guilty in September, he bargained for a lighter sentence by telling an
appalling story of attempted murder and a throwdown police slang for a weapon planted by cops to make
a shooting legally justifiable.

Perez said he and his partner, Officer Nino Durden, shot an unarmed 18th Street Gang member named Javier
Ovando, then planted a semiautomatic rifle on the unconscious suspect and claimed that Ovando had tried
to shoot them during a stakeout".

Wikipedia notes:

"As part of his plea bargain, Prez implicated scores of officers from the Rampart Divisions anti-gang unit,
describing routinely beating gang members, planting evidence on suspects, falsifying reports and covering
up unprovoked shootings".

(As a side note and while not technically false flag attacks police have been busted framing innocent people in many
other ways, as well.)

54. A former U.S. intelligence officer recently alleged:

"Most terrorists are false flag terrorists or are created by our own security services".

55. The head and special agent in charge of the FBIs Los Angeles office said that most terror attacks are committed by
the CIA and FBI as false flags.

Similarly, the director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan Lt. General William Odom said:

"By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In 78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against
international terrorism in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation".

(audio here).

56. Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the benefits of of false flags to justify their political agenda:

Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death.

Adolph Hitler

Why of course the people dont want war But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy,
and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a
parliament, or a communist dictatorship

Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do
is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country
to danger. It works the same in any country.

Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws
if their personal security is threatened.

Josef Stalin

Postscript: Private parties such as NBC News, as well as Muslims, Jews, Scientologists, African-Americans and Neo-
Nazis play this game as well.

Related: Paris Attacks: The Bigger Picture

Vladimir Putin Quoting Russian Intelligence: The Islamic State (ISIS) Is Financed From
40 Countries, Including G20 Members
November 18 2015 | From: GlobalResearch

President Vladimir Putin says hes shared Russian intelligence data on Islamic State financing with
his G20 colleagues: the terrorists appear to be financed from 40 countries, including some G20
member states.

During the summit, I provided examples based on our data on the financing of different Islamic State (IS, formerly
ISIS/ISIL) units by private individuals. This money, as we have established, comes from 40 countries and, there are
some of the G20 members among them, Putin told the journalists.

Related: Russia Tells The World About The NWO/CIA/MOSAD/MI6 Plan for Massacre in Paris
Putin also spoke of the urgent need to curb the illegal oil trade by IS.

Ive shown our colleagues photos taken from space and from aircraft which clearly demonstrate the scale of the
illegal trade in oil and petroleum products, he said.

The motorcade of refueling vehicles stretched for dozens of kilometers, so that from a height of 4,000 to 5,000
meters they stretch beyond the horizon, Putin added, comparing the convoy to gas and oil pipeline systems.

Its not the right time to try and figure out which country is more and which is less effective in the battle with Islamic State, as
now a united international effort is needed against the terrorist group, Putin said.

Putin reiterated Russias readiness to support armed opposition in Syria in its efforts to fight Islamic State.

Some armed opposition groups consider it possible to begin active operations against IS with Russias support.
And we are ready to provide such support from the air. If it happens it could become a good basis for the
subsequent work on a political settlement, he said.

The Truth: Political author Gearoid O Colmain discusses the Paris attacks with RT International

Putin pointed out the change in Washingtons stance on cooperation with Moscow in the fight against the terrorists.

We need to organize work specifically concentrated on the prevention of terrorist attacks and tackling terrorism on
a global scale. We offered to cooperate [with the US] in anti-IS efforts. Unfortunately, our American partners
refused. They just sent a written note and it says: we reject your offer, Putin said.

But life is always evolving and at a very fast pace, often teaching us lessons. And I think that now the realization
that an effective fight [against terror] can only be staged together is coming to everybody, the Russian leader said.

According to Putin, first of all it should be decided which groups in Syria can be considered terrorist organizations and which
can be attributed to an armed, but still legitimate part of the Syrian opposition.

Our efforts must be concentrated on the battle with terrorist organizations.

Putin also disagreed with Western criticism of Russias actions in Syria, where the country has been carrying out a large-
scale air campaign against Islamic State and other terror groups since September 30.

Its really difficult to criticize us, he said, adding that Russia has repeatedly asked its foreign partners to provide
data on terrorist targets in Syria.
Theyre afraid to inform us on the territories which we shouldnt strike, fearing that it is precisely where well strike;
that we are going to cheat everybody, the president said.

Apparently, their opinion of us is based on their own concept of human decency, he added.

Putin told the media that Russia has already established contact with the Syrian opposition, which has asked Moscow not to
carry out airstrikes in the territories it controls.

Still no conclusion on what caused Sinai plane crash

Its too early to make conclusions about the reasons for the crash of the Russian A321 jet over Egypts Sinai Peninsula in
late October, as all possible reasons are still being considered by the investigators, Putin said.

We know about all the possible scenarios, all of the scenarios are being considered. The final conclusion can only
be made after the implementation and completion of the inspection, he stressed.

If there was an explosion, the traces of explosives would have remained on the liners cover and on the
belongings of the passengers. Its inevitable. And we have enough equipment and skilled, world class experts,
capable of finding those traces. Only then would it be possible to speak about the reasons for this tragedy, the
president added.

With 224 people dying in the crash, Putin said that its a huge emotional pain for all of us; for all Russian people,
no matter what the cause of the crash was.

Another French False Flag?


November 15 2015 | From: VeteransToday
11th month, 11th District, Friday the 13th: It happened on Friday the 13th (commemorating the
massacre of the proto-illuminati Templars) in the 11th month, in Pariss 11th district. Its going to
be remembered as 11/13 or Friday the 13th. Illuminati numerology or coincidence?

I left Paris Friday at noon. As my plane landed in Chicago at 3:15 p.m. local time (9:15 p.m. Paris time) the media
was screaming Terrorists kill dozens in central Paris; hostages taken. The French military was occupying the
City of Lights. It looks like another Charlie Hebdo situation, only bigger and bloodier.

Related: Another Paris False Flag Attack?

By an eerie coincidenced at least I hope it was a coincidence I spent Thursday evening walking around central
Paris being interviewed about Januarys Charlie Hebdo false flag attacks. Little did I suspect that in less than 24 hours an
even bigger terror attack would rock the city.

Related: Paris Attack: Hollande Government as the Prime Suspect

Filmmaker Vincent LaPierre of Egalit et Reconciliation filmed me at the Fontaine St. Michel, in front of the Notre Dame
cathedral, and in various Left Bank locations as well as at E&R headquarters with leader Alain Soral. As I pontificated to the
camera about false flag terror in general and Charlie Hebdo in particular, passersby looked on with interest; one customer at
the outdoor caf table next to us told us she loved what she was hearing and appreciated the work we were doing.
Since we now know the Charlie Hebdo attack was a Gladio 2 false flag by the usual suspects (NATO hardliners and
Zionists), can we safely make the same assumption about these new Friday the 13th Paris atrocities?

I think we can. Almost every really big, spectacular terror attack turns out, after extensive critical examination, to have been
the usual state-sponsored false-flag stuff. There is no reason to think this one will be any different.

The first question, as always, is: Who gains? And the answer, as always, is: Authoritarian insiders. Zionists. Militarists.
Islamophobes. New World Order-Out-Of-Chaos freaks.

Speaking of which, the order-out-of-chaos thing is going into overdrive. Between the destruction of several Middle Eastern
countries, refugees flooding Europe, preparations for World War III vs. Russia and China, and ongoing false flag terror, it
seems the creative destruction people are staying busy.

The authorities will surely use these new attacks in the same way they used Charlie Hebdo:

As an excuse to shut down critical thinking and dissent.


They may even try to prevent me from returning to Paris on December 11th to present a paper exposing the Charlie Hebdo
false flag at a mainstream academic conference.

After all, I was already prevented once from entering Canada to give a talk on We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers
Question the French 9/11. Frances president Hollande has attacked Charlie Hebdo conspiracy theorists in harsh terms,
and his think tank, the Jean Jaurs Institute, named me as one of the worlds top five conspiracy intellectuals to watch out
for.
If I were a truly paranoid conspiracy theorist, or conspiracy intellectual, or whatever, I would think somebody staged these
new attacks just as I was leaving Paris and planning to return one month later becausewell, because theyre afraid that
my book We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo is picking up steam and threatening to expose the state-sponsored crimes of last
January.

According to this paranoid interpretation, the Charlie Hebdo high perps are fleeing forward into even bigger chaos and an
even bigger crackdown on freedomespecially the freedom to seek the truth about false flag terror.

This new attack may throw a monkey wrench into my efforts to get We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo translated into French
which was one of my items of business in Paris.

It may also impede efforts to save Mohamed Boutiche, a witness to the fact that the Kouachi brothers, the designated
Charlie Hebdo patsies, were intelligence assets. I just got word that Boutiche has been jailed and will be audited for trial on
November 23rd. The authorities will undoubtedly use the new wave of terror hysteria to try to railroad Boutiche and keep a
lid on his Charlie Hebdo revelations.

And lets not forget that the EU just instituted mandatory labeling of products from the Occupied Territories; the Zionists are
throwing a gargantuan hissy-fitjust like right before the Charlie Hebdo attacks. Beware of Zionists throwing hissy-fits.
So the least that can be said is that the timing seems extremely suspicious.

Then again, maybe its all just coincidence. Maybe this is an actual attack by angry Muslims. Maybe there is no state
sponsorship. Maybe this time, for once, it actually ISNT a false flag.

Related: Paris Attack: Hollande Government as the Prime Suspect

But what would radical Muslims gain? Its already being blamed on ISIS; yet that makes no sense, since Russia, not
France, is fighting ISIS in Syria. And ISIS, of course, is a fabricated synthetic-terror group, not a real Muslim group, anyway.
To believe the official Muslims did it stories of the big terror attacks starting with 9/11, youd have to think of the ostensible
Muslim perps as complete idiots, utterly incapable of strategic thinking, desperate to hand the Zionist neocons exactly the
kind of PR they want.

Sure, there are undoubtedly some stupid angry Muslims out there. But theyre likely to be patsies, not orchestrators.

So although its too early to say for sure, I think we can tentatively assume that this Friday the 13th massacre in Paris is just
the latest in a long series of false-flag spectacles.

And if we let the perps get away with this one, as theyve gotten away with all the others, we can expect more of the same.

New Zealands Zionist Diplomacy In The UN Security Council: Israel Has A Right To
Defend Itself
November 5 2015 | From: GlobalResearch
The reprehensible draft resolution circulated by New Zealand (NZ), the present chair of the UN
Security Council, is so blatantly biased against the Palestinian people that it proffers, in this
instance, the correct diplomatic protocol to mind its own business.

Related: Israeli General Captured in Iraq Confesses to Israel-Isis Coalition

Particularly asNZ is an on-the-record, apologist and morally blind supporter of Israel. On July 22, 2014 as Israels
vicious war on the people of Gaza raged relentlessly, Prime Minister John Key, repeated the zionist mantra that
Israel has a right to defend itself.

Related: Israeli pilot turned activist Says: I was part of a terror organization.

In June this year, during a visit to Israel, NZs Foreign Minister Murray McCully ran the idea of the resolution by Netanyahu.
So, sure enough, NZ, like all western governments, obsequiously replicated zionist propaganda in the resolution:

NZ normalises Israeli atrocities by falsely presenting Israel and Palestine as equal perpetrators and equal victims and

By pushing the demand that Palestine gives up its endeavour for justice in the International Criminal Court thus letting
Israel off scott free for its monstrous war crimes and crimes against humanity.

While NZ demands that Israel freezes its rapacious settlement expansion (in which NZ invests..see below), it absurdly
promotes the farce of negotiations that expand settlements. There is no demand by NZ that the zionist infiltrators leave the
present settlements that have illegally expropriated half of the remaining Palestinian West Bank.

NZ obediently keeps up the pretence of a two state solution when Netanyahu has repeatedly ruled out Palestinian
sovereignty

At the height of the 2014 Gaza war, Netanyahu revealed that hedoesnt envision Palestinian sovereignty in the West Bank
anytime soon. I think the Israeli people understand now what I always say: that there cannot be a situation, under any
agreement, in which we relinquish security control of the territory west of the River Jordan, he said at a press conference in
Jerusalem. In otherwords: no withdrawal and no Palestinian sovereignty, whichmeans no state of Palestine.
A few months later, Netanyahu said, in a much quoted interviewon the eve of the March 17election, that, indeed, no
Palestinian state would be created under his leadership.

To add insult to hypocrisy, NZ does not act on its recommendations it will not make a move to first recognise the
Palestinian state.

Then loading more inanity on the ridiculous, NZ calls on the same incompetent clowns the Quartet (United States, Russia,
United Nations and European Union), Security Council members and Arab states to maintain the posturing of the nihilistic
negotiations.

So what can the people of Palestine expect from a flunkey state that belongs to the Impunity- for- Israels- War- Crimes
Club?

A state furthermore that owns a government body, the New Zealand Super Fund that invests in and profits from a number of
Israeli companies integrally connected to the illegal settlements and/or Israels arms industry such as Israel Chemicals
which supplies white phosphorus to the USA which in turn sells its white phosphorous munitions back to Israel which then
fires them illegally on innocent Gaza children such as little Hamza Almidani, 3.
Palestinians can expect the same old bystander impunity that exacerbates their suffering caused by the ongoing betrayal of
NZs own obligations as a High Contracting Party to the Geneva Conventions to protect and uphold Palestinian political and
human rights.

This resolution comes at a crucial time when Palestinian children and youth are being extrajudicially executed in the street
for their courageous efforts to uphold their rights while NZ fails them and, in doing so, shames the decency of the people of
New Zealand.

Related: Captured ISIS Leaders in Iraq Confess to Receiving Military and Intelligence Support from the United States

Israeli Colonel Leading ISIL Terrorists Captured In Iraq


October 30 2015 | From: FarNews

"The security and popular forces have held captive an Israeli colonel," a commander of Iraq's
popular mobilization forces said on Thursday. "The Zionist officer is ranked colonel and had
participated in the Takfiri ISIL group's terrorist operations," he added.
Noting that he was arrested along with a number of ISIL terrorists, the commander said, "The Israeli colonel's name
is Yusi Oulen Shahak and is ranked colonel in Golani Brigade of the Zionist regime's army with the security and
military code of Re34356578765az231434."

Related: Saudi Arabias Blitzkrieg on Syria Capital Foiled Anew, Diverts 1,000s of ISIS Militants to Yemen

He said that the relevant bodies are now interrogating the Israeli colonel to understand the reasons behind his fighting
alongside the ISIL forces and the presence of other Zionist officers among ISIL terrorists.

The Iraqi security forces said the captured colonel has already made shocking confessions.

Several ISIL militants arrested in the last one year had


already confessed that Israeli agents from Mossad and
other Israeli espionage and intelligence bodies were present
in the first wave of ISIL attacks on Iraq and capture of Mosul
in Summer 2014, but no ranking Israeli agent had been
arrested.

Political and military experts told FNA that the capture of the
Israeli colonel will leave a grave impact on Iraq's war
strategy, including partnership with Israeli allies.

In a relevant development in July, Iraqi volunteer forces


announced that they had shot down a drone that was
spying on the Arab country's security forces in the city of
Fallujah, Western Iraq.

Iraq's popular forces reported that they had brought down a hostile surveillance aircraft over the Southeastern Fallujah in
Anbar Province. They said that the wreckage of the ISIL's spy drone carried 'Israel-Made' labels.

This was not the first Israeli-made drone downed in Iraq. In August an Israeli Hermes drone was shot down in the vicinity of
Baghdad Airport.
Related: Obama And The Western Allied States' Fake War Against The Islamic State (ISIS): The Islamic State Was
Created And Is Protected By The U.S. And Its Allies

Smoking Gun Emails: Bush And Blair Secretly Plotted War On Iraq In March 2002
October 21 2015 | From: GlobalResearch

Revealed by the British media are the details of the deal in blood forged between George W.
Bush and Tony Blair over the Iraq War.

The meetings took place in Crawford, Texas a year prior to the onslaught of the US-UK led invasion of
Iraq. According to the Daily Mail:

Related: Tony Blairs Deal In Blood with George W. Bush To Attack Iraq One Year Before the March 2003 Invasion

"The damning memo, from secretary of state Colin Powell to president George Bush, was written on March 28,
2002, a week before Bushs famous summit with Blair at his Crawford ranch in Texas.

The Powell document, headed Secret Memorandum for the President, lifts the lid on how Blair and Bush
secretly plotted the war behind closed doors at Crawford.

In it, Powell tells Bush that Blair will be with us on military action. Powell assures the president: The UK will follow
our lead.

The classified document also discloses that Blair agreed to act as a glorified spin doctor for the president by
presenting public affairs lines to convince a skeptical public that Saddam had Weapons of Mass Destruction -
when none existed.
In return, the president would flatter Blairs ego and give the impression that Britain was not Americas poodle but
an equal partner in the special relationship. (Mail on Sunday, October 18, 2015)"

The leaked documents reveal unequivocally that Tony Blair had agreed to waging war on Iraq, one year before the invasion
of March 2003:

"The sensational leak shows that Blair had given an unqualified pledge to sign up to the conflict a year before the
invasion started.

It flies in the face of the UK Prime Ministers public claims at the time that he was seeking a diplomatic solution to
the crisis.

He told voters: Were not proposing military action in direct contrast to what the secret email now reveals.

The disclosure is certain to lead for calls for Sir John Chilcot to reopen his inquiry into the Iraq War if, as is
believed, he has not seen the Powell memo.

A second explosive memo from the same cache also reveals how Bush used spies in the Labour Party to help
him to manipulate British public opinion in favor of the war.

The documents, obtained by The Mail on Sunday, are part of a batch of secret emails held on the private server of
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton which U.S. courts have forced her to reveal. (Mail on Sunday,
October 18, 2015)"

To read the Mail on Sunday article click here


Part two: This second, explosive memo, drafted by the U.S. Embassy in London, reveals how Bush
used Labour spies to manipulate British public opinion
Watch Putin Hammer Obama: Not Grounded In The Real World Absolutely
Unprofessional Politics
October 9 2015 | From: DCclothesline

The Obama administration claims that Putins military, which now include the globally feared
Spetnatz special operations teams, are attacking rebel forces opposed to Syrias President Assad.

Russia, on the other hand, says that the so-called rebels are actually ISIS terrorists that have been funded and
armed by America. Airstrikes in Syria heat up, so too has the rhetoric from both sides.

Russia, on the other hand, says that the so-called rebels are actually ISIS terrorists that have been funded and armed by
America.
These comments from Russian President Vladimir Putin responding to a U.S. journalist are essential watching as they shed
further light on President Obamas failed middle east policies, especially as they relate to the Islamic State. Moreover, they
provide insight into Putins motivations for taking action in Syria and how he views the current U.S. administration.

Via Truthstream Media:

Who on earth armed them?

Who armed the Syrians that were fighting with Assad?

Who created the necessary political and informational climate that facilitated the situation?

Who pushed for the delivery of arms to the area?

Do you really not understand as to who is fighting in Syria?

They are mercenaries mostly. Do you understand they are paid money?

I consider this absolutely unprofessional politics. It is not grounded in facts, in the real world.

Can they [Obama Administration] not think a step ahead? We dont stand for this kind of politics in the U.S. We
consider it wrong. It harms all parties, including you [U.S.A.].

To the President of the United States, the Vice-President and all other relevant people Tell them that we
do not want, or look for any confrontation whatsoever.

It should be clear that the propaganda machines are in full swing with outright obfuscations and geo-political machinations
coming from both sides.

We have entered the next cold war. But make no mistake, this time just as before, it could very quickly turn hot.

The Russians have already warned of nuclear consequences should they be pushed into a corner and they are regularly
flying strategic bombers along the West coast of the United States as a show of force. Moreover, they recently renovated
over 5,000 nuclear shelters in and around Moscow.

And on a personal note, Vladimir Putin is certainly not happy that the Obama administration has seized assets from Russian
politicians and business men while also threatening the personal fortune of the Russian President himself.

Wars have been fought over much less.

Perhaps one day historians will look back at 2014 and 2015 and pinpoint these years as the beginning of the next great
global conflict.

Related: Russias Transparency in Syria A Blinding Slap to Obama


Islamic State Has Gone Bankrupt; Where Did All The Oil Money Go?
October 6 2015 | From: Geopolitics / Sputnik

With US tanks and armories deliberately left for the ISIS/L to use later on, the terror group did a
blitzkrieg throughout North Iraq and Eastern Syria capturing all the oil fields along the way,
ransacked all assets from captured civilians, raped, enslaved and trafficked the women to their
benefactors in Riyadh and Saudi Arabia.

European pedophiles may be enjoying the spoils of war, too, with high probability. These madmen know not when
and how to stop.

Related: The Western Alliance Is Crumbling: EU Is Abandoning U.S. on Overthrowing Assad

Fortunately, Russias far superior Sukhois came in to save the day and its media is already declaring Game Over as the
Zionist Rats are scrambling for cover. Seven thousands Iranian Revolutionary Guards, in cooperation with a number of
Hezbollah and Iraqi Kurdish fighters, are also sweeping the area, reports said.

Putin Explains Who Supports ISIS

These decisive military operations just threw a monkey wrench into the Nazionist grand plan of establishing a Greater Israel
through the massive exploitation of Syrian Golan Heights gas deposits, among others, and the establishment of a bogus
Islamic Caliphate.

Related: The Secret Stupid Saudi-US Deal on Syria. Oil Gas Pipeline War

Related: Goldman Sachs in LibyaAnother Racket by the Dreadful Few

Related: The Islamic State militant group has started minting its own gold coins

Now, this is the kind of situation where the war hawks in Washington DC and the Jewish lobby were not really prepared of.
They think the happy days will always be. The only functioning entity in their camp nowadays is their presstitutes in the
mainstream media. But who even care listening?
Related: Poorly Executed Mass Shooting Has Become Routine

Even its own official spokesman Obama has expressed his enervation about those routine false flag operations with some
recycled actors because they couldnt afford to hire new production outfits anymore.

The whole enterprise is going bankrupt. Even Federal Reserve Chief Yellen is collapsing.

And so is the Islamic State.

Game Over: ISIL Short on Cash, Russian Planes Back Them Into Corner

ISIL is in serious trouble, as terrorists are being squeezed from all sides by airstrikes, meanwhile
their economy is coming apart at the seams.

Islamic radicals need to take over new territories to improve their budget, but with Russian planes hovering over
the Syrian sky, things arent that easy anymore.

Tough times have come to the self-proclaimed Islamic Caliphate with the start of Russian airstrikes: areas under ISIL control
are shrinking day after day under the pressure from Russian missiles that are backing the terrorists into a corner, Svetlana
Kholodnova of RIA Novosti said.

Turns out, ordinary ISIL terrorists are getting significantly poorer as a result of pay cuts. Many of them have started to flee
the Caliphate despite the risk of getting their heads chopped off if caught by their former comrades-in-arms.

"Hundreds of fighters are running away from ISIL because of low salaries," Kholodnova said, citing those who
managed to defect. A year ago, ISIL's finances were pretty good. Terrorists made millions of dollars from illegal oil
trade, taxing folks in conquered territories, selling ancient artefacts, human trafficking, ransoms and funds
from their oil-rich Persian Gulf "sponsors," Kholodnova said.
The question is: where did all the money go?

Well, first of all, the Iraqi Army pushed ISIL out of the oil wells in Iraq. Second, the United States used its channels
to eradicate middlemen who helped ISIL to sell illegal oil on the black market. Furthermore, with the start of airstrikes the
terrorist organization stopped receiving "cash convoys" from their sponsors due to a risk of them being destroyed, the RIA
Novosti journalist explained.

In addition to all of this, with more people fleeing the Caliphate, there are fewer people for ISIL to tax. Those who still live
in terrorist-controlled territories are struggling to pay their taxes and financial penalties imposed by ISIL, as the Caliphate
can't provide a working economy for people to live, preferring to spend most of its budget on buying weapons.

To revive its economy, ISIL needs take over naval ports in Tartus and Lattakia, the two richest cities on the
Mediterranean coast. But now, it's too little too late. The two port-cities have bases where Russian bombers land. It
will be simply unimaginable for ISIL to take over these two cities right now" Kholodnova said.

There isn't much that ISIL terrorists can do at this point. ISIL is being squeezed from all sides and quickly running out of
money. The terrorists can either flee or surrender to the mercy of victors. The first choice seems better to them, especially
after all the trouble and hardship they have brought to Syria and Iraq over the past few years. The time for payback is
nearing.

Read more related aricles at: Geopolitics

Jeremy Corbyn: 9/11 Was 'Manipulated' + Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK
And Israel As Being The Actual 9/11 Terrorists & RT Declares 9/11 An Inside Job
September 29 2015 | From: TheTelegraph / MethodicalDeception / WorldTruthTV / RT

In comments that will raise questions about his suitability to lead the Labour Party, Mr Corbyn
appeared to blame George Bush and Tony Blair for using the September 11 attacks in New York to
allow them to go to war. Comment: If you are like me you are sick of the flogging of the 9/11 horse -
however busting this wide open is a key necessity and the developments just keep coming...

Jeremy Corbyn has claimed that 9/11 was "manipulated" to make it look like Osama Bin Laden was responsible to
allow the West to go to war in Afghanistan. [And he has the corrupt cabal-western governments crapping
themselves].

In comments that will raise questions about his suitability to lead the Labour Party, Mr Corbyn appeared to blame George
Bush and Tony Blair for using the September 11 attacks in New York to allow them to go to war.

In a series of further articles, Mr Corbyn also appears to endorse controversial conspiracy theories about a New World
Order.

...

Mr Corbyn was heavily criticised in the days before winning the Labour leadership after suggesting that the [apparent] death
of Osama Bin Laden was a tragedy. In the 2003 article for The Morning Star newspaper, Mr Corbyn wrote:

"Historians will study with interest the news manipulation of the past 18 months. After September 11, the claims
that bin Laden and al-Qaida had committed the atrocity were quickly and loudly made.

This was turned into an attack on the Taliban and then, subtly, into regime change in Afghanistan.

However, in previous years he wrote a series of articles which appear to have endorsed the conspiracy theory about the New
World Order.

The New World Order conspiracy is frequently linked to theories about the so-called Illuminati and claims about a
totalitarian world government.
In an article for Labour Briefing in 1991, Mr Corbyn wrote:

"We now know that the Gulf War was a curtain-raiser for the New World Order: the rich and powerful, white and
western will be able to maintain the present economic order with free use of all the weapons they wish for.

That same year, he said in Socialist Campaign Group News:

"The aim of the war machine of the United States is to maintain a world order dominated by the banks and
multinational companies of Europe and North America.

The following year, in a piece for Labour Peace Action, Mr Corbyn said:

"What is required now is a bold, democratic alternative to the New World Order. The US veto at the Earth summit
in Rio... shows just who calls the shots in this New World Order and who will be asked to foot the bill.

Mr Corbyn has previously shared a platform with Ken O'Keefe, who has alleged that President Bush was a member of The
New World Order who had orchestrated the September 11 attacks for personal gain.

The phrase was also used in a speech by George H.W Bush. Mr Corbyns spokesman refused to deny that the new Labour
leader was referring to the New World Order conspiracy theory in his articles.

Related: Gordon Campbell on the PMs TPP concessions on medicines

9/11: From Cheney to MOSSAD


From: MethodicalDeception

On Thursday, September 9, 2015 author Rebekah Roth was interviewed about her new book 'Methodical Deception'.
New information she has recovered about the 9/11 false flag event will shock you to your core. This bombshell
evidence destroys the "official story", forever. Israeli Mossad involvement in the 9/11 false flag attacks can no longer
be denied.

Further Related Detail: Preparing the WTC for Destruction

To watch the FULL 75+ minute SGT Report interview click here.

Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel as Being The Actual 9/11
Terrorists
Undoubtedly the 9/11 attacks on New York City and Washington DC are the most misrepresented by officialdom in
US history.
"9/11 was an Anglo-American black operation executed in collusion with Israeli Secret Services and Saudi Arabian
financiers.

- 9/11 Investigator

Whereas the assassination of John F. Kennedy is now understood to have been a classic CIA Execution Plan, it does not
come close to 9/11 in terms of the number and magnitude of outright falsehoods, misleading statements, fake science and
fraudulent facts submitted by officials and agents of the US Government.

The official 9/11 Commission Report stands as the most fabricated document ever produced by US tax dollars. Not only did
the investigation avoid every serious inquiry about how two steel frame building came down after being dustified in NYC, it
also subverted every initiative to ferret out the truth.

It appears that Russia has been conducting systematic data dumps on 9/11, the release of which represents more factual
information on the attacks than any US Government source. In the wake of the Anglo-American coup dtat conducted by the
CIA and MI6 in Kiev, it appears that Russia has no more patience for Western interference.

Especially when nations are destabilized on Russias borders do the stakes in this highly consequential geopolitical chess
match go up.

Since Vladimir Putin has no intention of starting World War 3, he can only respond to US-EU meddling by using asymmetric
warfare on the internet. Were the American people to understand that the US Federal Government perpetrated the 9/11
destruction, everything would change in a heartbeat.

Because the Obama Administration has shown no sign of aborting its planned takeover of the Ukraine, Russia is left with very
few, but still quite potent options.
Operation Terror
The 9/11 story you are not supposed to
know.
Based on actual under-reported 9/11 events.

James McCullough from the mysterious "Council" gives


a special assignment to CIA agent Aaron Delgado to
attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and
pin the blame on Muslim Terrorists.

Delgado and fellow agents, Phillip Singer and Chase


Jordan, work with a group of unsuspecting engineers to
develop unmanned jets that will hit their assigned
targets.The Army and the FBI begin to uncover the plot,
forcing Delgado to intervene.

The CIA agents also have to deal with an increasingly


suspicious George Poole, the lead engineer working on
the drones, who becomes skeptical on how the remote
controlled planes will be used. A

battle between good and evil ensues as the plot to


attack America becomes a hard-hitting reality.

See the trailer below and the full movie


at: OperationTerror

The following excerpt recently appeared on an alternative news website - Veterans Today - under the subtitle Too Classified
to Publish. Essentially this unprecedented release of ultra-secret and highly classified information illustrates Putins new tack
toward Western intractability. Simply put, Russia will no longer stand by idly while the Anglo-American Juggernaut projects it
power wherever it so chooses.

"Too Classified to Publish"

According to a retired FXX agent specializing in Israeli counter intel: The type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified
version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus
stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era.

Chemical analysis done by DOE Sandi was able to identify the chemical/radiation footprint or fingerprint of the warheads
based on samples taken after 911 of the fallout at ground zero. (Editors note: Nuclear weapon use at ground zero is
confirmed from multiple sources)

All plutonium based warheads have a chemical fingerprint that can identify the type of design and where the PU was made
and how old it is. This was the 911 blackmail on Bush 1 and 2, the illegal transfer of surplus US nuclear weapons to the
Israelis and why the continued cover up, along with the stolen gold and stock fraud that was going on Wall Street etc.
According to file ENW57.pdf on page 66. (Editors note: Document received and confirmed)
Only a 2 kiloton device was needed to drop the buildings. A 2 kiloton device will produce a fireball of apx 150 to 200 feet in
diameter at over 4000 degrees Centigrade. Just large enough to melt the I beams of the central core of the building and drop
them in place.

The light flash would last less than 1 second and primarily be in the UV light range. Overpressure would only be at 60PSI max
and directed upwards with the blast. See underground effect.

Fallout would be minimal and located to within ground zero range only. Radiation would drop to acceptable levels within 72
hrs. after the blast. Most fall out was trapped in the cement dust thus causing all of the recent cancer deaths that we are now
seeing in NYC amongst first responders. (Editors note: Consistent with site data)
High FluxIsotope Reactor Core Cross Section

Melted steel and iron oxide or nano thermite is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray / Neutron flux induced into the
central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into iron oxide consuming the carbon and silicone in the steel.

This explains the missing steel columns and the very important clue of the vaporized 20 ton antenna tower atop the south
tower. The upward blast of radiation literally vaporized it. Video evidence proves this to be true. (Editors note: Tower issue a
vital one.)

The total XXOO data file from DOE Sandia on the 911 event is well over 72 MB. P.S. Snowden didnt have a Q clearance so
he missed this one. Carnaberry had a pretty good stash of documents on the subject. (All under the transit stuff.) The entire
nuclear nonproliferation story of stolen nuclear material coming from Russia was an Israeli cover story to hide the original
source of weapons material coming from the US stock piles. (Editors note: Fully confirmed)

Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this
scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign country as IOUs in order to
get what they wanted. Tom Countryman a well-known Israeli operative is curiously now in charge of N.N.P. at the State
Department under Obama.(?) He was put there by Ram Emanuel.
It appears that the weapon of choice for the Israelis were
the W-54 and follow on series of nuclear pits taken from the
Amarillo TX storage dump. This was what Carnaberry was
working on for Bush senior in Houston.

A total of over 350 pits were transferred to the Israelis over


a 10 to 20 year period of time. The W-54 type of pit design
were the most desirable due to the 2 point implosion pit
design.

This is the easiest to re manufacture and modify as


compared to other circular pit designs.

The pill shaped design of the W-54 type weapon contains


over 1.5 times more plutonium than a standard pit. This
Early Israeli core model would allow enough Plutonium to be recovered that was still
of weapons grade use even after 32 plus years of age.
Americium build up in the pit over time eventually makes the Pit unusable as a weapon so they have a limited shelf life based
on how fast or slow the Plutonium was produce in the reactor at Stanford.

Usually it was about 150 days max. Irradiation time in the reactor during production determines the shelf life of the pit as
weapons grade material. All of the micro nukes used by the Israelis are re-manufactured W-54 type series devices.

Khazelov confirmed this a micro nuke bombing

These devices were used in the Bali bombing and the London bombing and in Japan on their reactors. (Editors note: Nuclear
weapon use in Bali confirmed) Also used in Damascus, Iraq and Afghanistan by the US. (Editors note: Multiple confirmation
including site samples.)
These are stored in most Israelite embassies for ease of deployment. The ones used on 911 were kept at the Israeli
consulate in NYC until put in place. After 911 the FBI now checks all diplomatic pouches with a Geiger counter before
entering or leaving the US.

The South African weapons were also surplus W-54 artillery shells acquired from Israeli and final assembly and testing was
done in South Africa with Israel assistance. (Editors note: This explains Pelendaba production issues.)

Note the melted rock under the foundations of the WTC in the two images above - this can only be caused by the extremely intense heat generated in
a nuclear detonation

This was done because the Israelis needed a testing ground in order to make sure that there rebuilt weapons would work as
designed. (Editors note: Testing on Sept. 22, 1979 multiple confirmations.) The North Korean weapons are also of the 155
mm artillery design as provided by Israel.

The true North Korean nuclear weapons program is based on nuclear artillery use and not missiles. The plan is to use a
massive artillery barge on South Korea if war breaks out this include the use of small nuclear artillery shells to counter US
tanks rockets and artillery.

The Saudis also have a stash of W-54s acquired from the US under Bush2. (Editors note: Confirmed) The Israelis have also
provided them to India, Brazil, China, Taiwan, Japan, North and South Korea etc. (Editors note: All but South Korea
confirmed. Canada had been believed to be the source of Brazilian nuclear weapons.) Dimona is a standard 75 megawatt
thermal open top reactor as used in France for their plutonium weapons production program, their version of
Stanford (Editors note: Probably Hanford).
Dismona, Israel

Due to over use as a fast breeder reactor by the Israelis, Dimona suffered a steam explosion IE a flash over indecent due to
neutron criticality back in the late 1980s under Bush 1. This shut down its operation for many years until repairs could be
made.

It know only operates at very low power levels due to neutron absorption damage to the containment vessel. Now mainly use
for isotope production. This forced the Israelis to turn to stolen nuclear stock piles from the US for the continuation of their
nuclear program.

The Israelis knowing that the nuclear material that they had acquire only had a limited shelf life left before it was no longer
usable as weapons grade then tried to dump it on the surplus market as fast as possible before it was of no use to them. So
they dumped it on unsuspecting nations who would only sit on it and not be able to test it. These were the fissile tests in North
Korea. (Editors note: Confirmed, multiple sources)

When everybody caught on to the scam such as Japan and Korea. (IE the Korean sub sinkings etc) they were angry because
they paid big bucks for junk. This started a mini cold war with Israel and her old clients. However with micro nukes even as
the plutonium ages it will still fissile producing a smaller size detonation well under 2 kiloton in size.
So they can still be used as small dirty bombs or as very small tactical nukes such as the nuclear artillery strikes on
Damascus with rocket assisted W-54s. (Editors note: Confirmed strike, May 4, 2013) On the W-54 pit design it is pill shaped
and it is only about 4 inches in diameter and weighs about 24 pounds.

Most of the fuel is consumed in the plasma fire ball when detonated so there is very little plutonium fallout left to escape. If it is
salted with other materials the fallout can be even reduced to lower levels such as in an enhanced radiation device or the so
called neutron bomb. This is what was used on 911.

The primary purpose of the nuclear weapon used on 911 was to produce a massive Gamma ray / neutron flux that would
vaporize about 150 to 300 feet of 6 inch thick steal I-beams that constituted the central core of the WTC buildings. This
created a free fall event as seen on TV that day.
Evidence was also found of demolition charges being placed on an angle on key structural suports. This was confirmed by demolition experts as being
a technique used to generate a free-fall demolition within a buildings own footprint

The flash would be hidden from sight due to the underground detonation. Most of the light was in the non-visible light
spectrum any way. Over pressure would be reduced to 6 psi due to the blast traveling up the central core and neutron
radiation vaporizing the TV antenna at the top of the building as see on TV.

The fallout would be mainly vaporized concrete cement and iron oxide. This is why after 911 they told everyone on TV that
the beta radiation burns that people were getting were due to the caustic cement dust and not due to the radiation effects
from the radioactive cement fallout. (Editors note: Fully confirmed)
The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams. This was the so called Nano Thermite that was
found everywhere. Fallout was limited to a 1 mile area around down town NYC. See charts. (Editors note: Received)

Radiation decay was reduced to safe low levels after 72 hrs., (Editors note: Fully confirmed) outside of ground zero its self.
This is why the area was blocked off from the public for 3 days after the event, in order to let the radiation drop to safe levels.

If you read this excerpt closely, you can clearly see that Russia means business. It is what they did not say - directly - that
makes this data-dump so poignant and dangerous to the Anglo-American power structure.

RT Declares 9/11 Was An Inside Job

Geopolitical Summary Q3 2015 + The Big List Of 33 Things That Are Going To Happen
In September 2015
August 23 2015 | From: Geopolitics / End Of The American Dream

The year 2015 started with much optimism owing to the resolute objective of the BRICS countries
to move out from the old Western paradigm of out of chaos, order to Oriental philosophy of
win-win cooperation between the East and the West.

The anticipated fiat financial crash is about to happen with only the exact date that is unknown.
GeoPolitical and SocioEconomics Q1 Summary [Updated]

BRICS/SCO Sow Panic in Exceptionalistan

Thats why the war chickenhawks of the West continued with their attempts to start a thermonuclear confrontation with the
East. Since then, there were covert attacks and counterattacks with real casualties on the ground.

When Chinas Shanghai Stock Exchange was attacked with the usual Soros-like speculative rumor mongering, the
former retaliated with cyber offensive against NYSE and American Airlines costing massive flight cancellations and stock
market disruptions.

But that wasnt the end of it. China still has a few tricks up on her sleeve and she did the unthinkable. Instead of allowing the
yuan currency to appreciate in value as what the West has been demanding for decades, the Peoples Bank of China did
the exact opposite and devalued the yuan for three successive days, or until the West responded explosively.

Chinas recent attempt to tear down the dominance of the fiat dollar by successive devaluation of its yuan currency has been
cut shortly by the Tianjin Blast that kills more than a hundred and injured 700 more.
This attack on the Chinese economy was followed by another bombing in central Bangkok Thailand targeting foreign
tourists; several Chinese tourists were among the casualties.

Understand that up to this point, China did not engage herself in actual kinetic warfare with the West. Now, it has come to a
point when the nations strategy is expected to change.

China has just tested one of its deadliest first strike ICBM with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles [MIRV].
Previously, its supersonic armed capabilities was also demonstrated.

China Confirms 3rd Test of Hypersonic Missile


Military pieces between NATO and Russia are also being moved into strategic locations, with the former mostly utilizing
proxies as advance foot soldiers and cannon fodders. UK and US military advisers are already training their pawns in what
could be their final assault against Russia.

If theres any consolation amidst this saber rattling between historical foes and the insatiable drive to dominate whole
sections of society by the exceptionalist few, its the capacity of war deterrence by Russia as displayed during its simulated
attacks on USS Donald Duck in the Mediterranean.

This ongoing covert war is not only fought in the realms of the military and finance but also in the new interactive media. Just
recently, another successful breach against a dating website exposes VIP accounts of people in Washington and London.

This recent offensive against the exceptionalists is on top of the pedophile exposure against prominent personalities inside
Western Oligarchy and political elite.

The Nazi-House of Windsor connection has also been firmly established in the mainstream media. Only the severely
brainwashed should continue to worship these lowlife parasites.
On top of all the media, acoustic and kinetic wars, there is a far more covert assault being planned against all human
species of this planet. The Vatican is about to launch what could be its most sinister psychological offensive in its entire
history.

On September, the use of the biggest geopolitical platform that is the United Nations to launch its climate change type
agenda, as previously leaked to the media in a form of an encyclical, will plunge the planet into a globalist control
mechanism that is more deceptive than what we have experienced so far [but there are plans afoot to stop this].

BRICS Leaders & Pope Bergoglio Will Address United Nations Next Month

In another sign of things to come, leaders from BRICS countries and the Vatican will be hitting the podium at the United
Nations General Assembly on September.

Back in 2014, Pope Francis was said to have issued an official statement that addresses the integrity of every corporation
on Earth.

Putin, Xi, Rouhani to address annual UN high-level meeting

Whether that is true or not, all Corporate Monopolies are still in full operation on this planet. Until such time as all
governments of the world perform and behave as they should, all these psychological acrobatics mean nothing.

While, it is true that the people of the world have acquired a certain level of awareness previously unobtainable, the
organized criminals are also upping the ante by using every tool at their disposal. We have no other recourse but to remain
vigilant and should try to anticipate their next move even at the point of being proven wrong in the end.

Its far better to err on the side of caution than to deal with a scorched planet, or the rise of mindless automatons.

Jade Helm: Mastering the Human Domain thru Artificial Intelligence


Here is a big list of whats coming by next month and lets try to anticipate how these events will be exploited

Possible flash points still remain to be Ukraine, Syria and the Korean Peninsula.

The Big List Of 33 Things That Are Going To Happen In September 2015

Is September 2015 going to be a month that changes history? For months, there has been an unprecedented amount of
buzz all over the Internet about what is going to happen in September. And without a doubt, we are going to witness a
convergence of events during that month that is quite remarkable.

What I have attempted to do in this article is to put together a list of things that we know will happen next month. Some of
the lists that I have seen contain things that cannot be proven or that are simply inaccurate. And of course it is very likely
that some things will happen in September that we cannot anticipate right now.

I am just providing the information that I have at this time, and it is up to you and your family to prepare for what you believe
will happen. The following is my big list of 33 things that are going to happen in September 2015
September 1 This marks the beginning of FEMAs annual National Preparedness Month

September 7 Labor Day

September 11 The 14th anniversary (7+7) of 9/11

September 11 The last day of trading on Wall Street before the end of the Shemitah year

September 12 Madonnas Rebel Heart Tour opens in the United States. The first stop is in Washington D.C.
and according to Holly Deyo the opening theme is Desecration of The Bride and Arrival of Fallen Angels
September 12 and September 13 Rabbi Chaim Kanievsky, a leading authority in Ultra-Orthodox Judaism, has indicated
that the Messiah that the Jewish people are expecting could come at this time

September 13 The last day of the Shemitah year. During the last two Shemitah cycles, we witnessed record-breaking
stock market crashes on the very last day of the Shemitah year (Elul 29 on the Biblical calendar). For example, if you go
back to September 17th, 2001 (which was Elul 29 on the Biblical calendar), we witnessed the greatest one day stock market
crash in all of U.S. history up until that time.

The Dow plunged 684 points, and it was a record that held for exactly seven years until the end of the next Shemitah
cycle. On September 29th, 2008 (which was also Elul 29 on the Biblical calendar), the Dow plummeted 777 points, which
still today remains the greatest one day stock market crash of all time in the United States. Now we are in another Shemitah
year. It began in the fall of 2014, and it ends on September 13th, 2015.

September 13 Partial solar eclipse


September 14 Rosh Hashanah

September 14 The first day of trading on Wall Street after the end of the Shemitah year

September 15 The 70th session of the UN General Assembly begins on this date. It has been widely reported that
France plans to introduce a resolution which will give formal UN Security Council recognition to a Palestinian state shortly
after the new session begins.

Up until now, the U.S. has always been the one blocking such a resolution, but Barack Obama has already indicated that
things may be different this time around. It would be extremely difficult to overstate the significance of this.

September 15 The Jade Helm military exercises are scheduled to end


September 17 If there is going to be a rate hike in September, this is probably when the Federal Reserve will do it

September 17 This is the deadline for Congress to vote on Obamas deal with Iran

September 17 Constitution Day most Americans do not even know that this holiday exists

September 18 The Days of Awe conference in Sandpoint, Idaho Christians from all over the nation will be gathering to
call out to God in prayer and to repent for the sins of our country

September 20 to September 26 The World Week For Peace in Palestine Israel sponsored by the World Council of
Churches

September 21 This is when the Hajj (pilgrimage to Mecca) is projected to begin

September 21 The UN International Day Of Peace

September 22 In Islam, the Day of Arafat falls on this day

September 23 The last day of the summer

September 23 Yom Kippur

September 23 The Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha, also known as the Feast of the Sacrifice, begins
September 23 Pope Francis arrives at the White House to meet with Barack Obama

September 23 The 266th Pope will be meeting with the president of the United States on the 266th day of the
year. Some have suggested that something is being birthed on that day since 266 days is the average length of the
human gestation period.

September 24 The Pope addresses a joint session of the U.S. Congress

September 25 On May 14th, 2014 French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius famously proclaimed that we had only 500
days to avoid climate chaos. His time frame of 500 days ends on September 25th.
September 25 The Pope will hold mass in Madison Square Garden in New York City

September 25 to September 27 The United Nations launches a brand new universal agenda for humanity known as
the 2030 Agenda

September 25 The Pope appears at the UN to deliver an address to kick off the conference at which the 2030 Agenda will
be unveiled
September 26 and 27 The Pope will be traveling to Philadelphia for the 2015 World Meeting of Families

September 28 The first day of the Feast of Tabernacles

September 28 This is the date for the last of the four blood moons that fall on Biblical festival dates during 2014 and
2015. This blood moon will be a supermoon and it will be clearly visible from the city of Jerusalem.

Due to the ending of the Shemitah year and numerous other factors, there is rampant speculation that a stock market crash
is going to happen in the United States during the month of September. Previously, I have expressed my view that a major
global financial crisis is imminent, but my warning covers all of the remaining months of 2015. Since I cannot prove that a
stock market crash will happen next month, I have left it off the list. But without a doubt, we are entering the danger zone.

There is also lots of speculation about unusual activity at the Large Hadron Collider during the month of September. In my
research, I have not yet come across anything that confirms that. If you have solid information concerning this, please send
it to me. But certainly, what they are doing with the Large Hadron Collider concerns me greatly.

This is something that I covered in a previous article entitled Will The Large Hadron Collider Open Up A Portal To Another
Dimension?
In addition, I am also aware that there is a tremendous amount of speculation about an asteroid or a meteor that may or
may not be heading toward our planet next month. At this time, I have no way of proving this is true, and I have no way of
disproving it is true either.

I have not come across anything that I can independently verify that indicates that this will or will not happen. In law school I
was trained to stick to the facts, and I dont have any facts. If you do have some solid and verifiable information, please
share it with me.

Finally, I would like to acknowledge that there is plenty of speculation about certain natural disasters that may happen in
September. They may indeed happen, but I cannot prove anything of that nature right now so I have left those natural
disasters off the list.

Needless to say, next month promises to be absolutely crazy, and our time for preparing is running out.

Disaster can strike very suddenly, and when it does, average citizens can be caught totally unprepared. This is a point that
Carl Gallups, the author of a new book entitled Be Thou Prepared: Equipping the Church for Persecution and Times of
Trouble, recently made during an interview with WND

Gallups identifies specific incidents when civil society collapsed, most notably in New Orleans immediately following
Hurricane Katrina.

You ended up with the worst of both worlds, Gallups observed.

You had widespread criminality, anarchy and disorder, and somehow, at the same time, you had
government officials going around enforcing wildly tyrannical guidelines and even confiscating firearms.

Continue reading here


People Are Finally Learning About False Flag Terror
August 17 2015 | From: GlobalResearch

Governments from around the world admit they carry out false flag terror.

A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that under orders from the chief of the Gestapo he and
some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify
the invasion of Poland. Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann
Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building, and then falsely blaming the communists for the
arson.

Related: How the NSA let 9/11 Happen

Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Unions Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in
1939, and declared that the fire originated from Finland as a basis launching the Winter War four days later .

Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic
facilities, then left behind evidence implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the
Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).
The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the
country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligenceadmit that NATO, with the
help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the
communists, in order to rally peoples support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.

As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people,
unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people,
the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security(and see this)(Italy and other European countries subject to the
terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special.

As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960s, the American Joint Chiefs of
Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and
also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See
the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer
for ABCs World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

2 years before, American Senator George Smathers had suggested that the U.S. make a false attack made on Guantanamo
Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow
Castro].
And Official State Department documents show that only nine months before the Joint Chiefs of Staff plan was proposed the
head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to
justify an invasion of that country. The 3 plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the
South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him to participate in an operation aimed at
discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder
incident, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.

An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred
Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002,
French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).
Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings and falsely
blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).

According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in
2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.

The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.

As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7
innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police,
in order to join the war on terror.
Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a
senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House
officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the
anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.

Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda,
having our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization.
The US Department Of Justice - A perverted Pile of Shit

It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist
operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaedas ranks, causing operatives to doubt
others identities and to question the validity of communications.

United Press International reported in June 2005:

U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92
pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been
physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers.

Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or
terrorist cells with substantial government backing.

Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent
provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against
civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians,
as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police
officers (and see this).

At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the
crowd to violence.

A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they
were rebels killed in combat.

U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then drop automatic weapons near their body so
they can pretend they were militants.

The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence Prince
Bandar admitted last the Saudi government controls Chechen terrorists.

So Common - Theres a Name for It


This tactic is so common that it was given a name for hundreds of years ago.

False flag terrorism is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going
to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:

"False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations,
which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities.

The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than
ones own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in
peace-time; for example, during Italys strategy of tension."

The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship
in its own navy. Because the enemys flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a
false flag attack.

Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for naval, air and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks.

Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags

Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:

This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.

- Plato

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.

- U.S. President James Madison

A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people! In individuals, insanity is rare; but in
groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.

- Friedrich Nietzsche

Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death.

- Adolph Hitler

Why of course the people dont want war But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy,
and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a
parliament, or a communist dictatorship

Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do
is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to
danger. It works the same in any country.

- Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if
their personal security is threatened.

- Josef Stalin
People Are Waking Up to False Flags

People are slowly waking up to this whole con job by governments who want to justify war.

More people are talking about the phrase false flag than ever before.

Australias Double Game On 'Terrorism'


June 28 2015 | From: GlobalResearch

The Australian Government is wrestling with a double game it has created by backing sectarian
terrorists in Syria, encouraging the export of young Australians to these groups, then entering into
a fake war against terrorism and ringing alarm bells over the threat of them returning home.

In the name of anti-terrorism Canberra has cancelled dozens of passports and, more recently, passed a law to strip
citizenship from dual citizens believed to be involved with some of the armed groups plaguing Syria and Iraq. Since
2012 about 200 Australian citizens are thought to have joined these groups and several dozen have been killed.

Related: Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's President Assad &
War is Peace: US Needs External Enemy to Ensure Internal Unity

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott recently attacked the state-owned Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) for
allowing Zaky Mallah, a notorious supporter of anti-Syrian Islamists, to speak on national television. Yet Mallah, who boasts
of his close relations Australias domestic intelligence, has enjoyed substantial media attention in recent years.
His media status is part of a wider pattern. The western media has carried many stories about the family man turned suicide
bomber or the Islamist humanitarian workers who travelled to Syria, supposedly to help children and refugees. If the
humanitarian story did not fit they were said to have been backing moderate armed groups.

It is the Australians of Syrian origin who have been frozen out of the national media. The great majority of them backed the
Syrian Government against western backed terrorism. Their impassioned demonstrations in Australian cities, over 2011-
2013, were mostly ignored. In face of a propaganda war, with a string of stories falsely implicating the Syrian Army in
massacres and chemical weapons attacks, very few pro-Syrian voices have been permitted.

This effective media blockade has banished voices who might challenge the latest chemical weapons or barrel bombing
story, churned out against the regime year after year. Considerable evidence has accumulated on these fabrications. Much
of it has to do with sectarian Islamists either blaming the Syrian Army for their own atrocities or rebadging their own
casualties as civilians. Yet vigorous self-censorship has meant that very few exposs appear in the Australian media.

Reme Sakr

Dissidents have faced ferocious attacks. Reme Sakr, a young Syrian-Australian who visited her father in Syria in late 2013,
was vilified by the ABC program Media Watch in early 2014. The ABC condemned the Good Weekend magazine for running
a sympathetic profile of someone who was clearly pro-Syrian. They falsely accused her of supporting war crimes. She is
now suing the ABC.

Throughout 2012-2013 Australias Labor Government was an active collaborator with Washington over the ill-fated regime
change plan for Syria. Canberra backed a series of absurd exile groups set up by the US and the Gulf monarchies as the
legitimate representatives of the Syrian people. Along with a number of European states, Australia also expelled the Syrian
Ambassador, after it was falsely claimed the Syrian Army had murdered pro-Government villagers at Houla.

Some government massacre claims were even debunked in the western media. The Aqrab massacre, very close to Houla
and also of pro-government villagers, was blamed on the Army but exposed by Alex Thompson. The Daraya massacre of
civilians, kidnapped as part of a failed prisoner exchange, was also blamed on the Army but debunked by Robert Fisk. Both
were carried out by groups of the western backed Free Syrian Army.

Such exposures were exceptions to the rule. The western propaganda offensive encouraged extremists to join in a virtual
holy war against Syria. No Australian was detained or deterred from travelling to Syria in the first two years of the crisis. The
first few killed were often praised as humanitarian workers or victims of the regimes indiscriminate bombing.

Related: Obama And The Western Allied States' Fake War Against The Islamic State (ISIS): The Islamic State Was
Created And Is Protected By The U.S. And Its Allies

Yet in August 2012 a US intelligence report (DIA) noted two things, at odds with Washingtons public position.

First, the Syrian Revolution had been dominated by sectarian Islamists from the beginning: the Salafists, the Muslim
Brotherhood and AQI (al Qaeda in Iraq, later ISIS) are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria.

Second, the idea of a sectarian Islamic State was anticipated and thought to suit western purposes. AQI wanted a
sectarian war in Syria, which could lead to a Salafist principality in Eastern Syria exactly what the supporting powers to
the opposition ['the West, Gulf Countries and Turkey'] want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime ISI could also declare an
Islamic State through its union with other terrorist organisations.

US intelligence did not waste time with the political for public consumption statements. They knew were working with
terrorist groups in yet another Middle Eastern regime change operation.

Australias home-grown terrorists must have been further emboldened in their belief that Canberra shared their aims when,
in October 2012, Foreign Minister Bob Carr told national television that resolution of the Syrian crisis needed an
assassination and major defections from the Syrian Army. This very un-diplomatic (and probably criminal) statement
signalled to the fanatics that they could travel to Syria to attack and kill, imagining they had Canberras blessing.
Related: Truth In Media: The Origin Of ISIS - Ben Swann Confronts Obama And Exposes Engineered War

But it was not so simple. In late 2013 events forced a change in US strategy. First, a Russian initiative on chemical weapons
(the Syrian Government maintains it had never used them) defused a planned US missile strike on Syria. Second, the
Syrian Government began to gain the upper hand in the populated areas of western Syria, securing a number of towns
along the Lebanese border with the help of the Lebanese resistance movement, led by Hezbollah.

Third, the open sectarianism and well publicised atrocities of rebel groups, particularly the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
(ISIS), attracted worldwide attention. The previous talk of humanitarian intervention was displaced by western anti-terrorist
intervention, aimed at ISIS.

Yet the moderate rebel myth persists and the western attacks on ISIS have been cosmetic. (The Syrian and Iraqi Armies,
backed by Hezbollah and Iran, remain the main forces combating ISIS.) There are obvious reasons for this.

US leaders including Vice President Joe Biden and Armed Forces Chief Martin Dempsey have admitted that their major
allies back ISIS.

The evidence is quite clear that US regards ISIS and other al Qaeda factions as strategic assets.

Nevertheless, designation of significant sections of the Syrian and Iraqi insurgency as terrorists has unsettled US
collaborators, including Australia. Reinforcing this is the recognition that the Syrian regime is not going away, and that
many foreign terrorists are trying to return home. What this might mean is well illustrated by the videos of terrorist head-
chopping and throat cutting.

Those who were happy to foment terrorism against others have become worried that the proverbial chickens are coming
home to roost. Caught in their own double game they are blaming everyone but themselves.

Related: US Allies Against ISIS Are Actually ISIS Main Allies

Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's


President Assad
& War is Peace: US Needs External Enemy to Ensure Internal Unity
May 26 2015 | From: ZeroHedge / Geopolitics

Pentagon Report Predicted Wests Support for Islamist Rebels Would Create ISIS
Anti-ISIS coalition knowingly sponsored violent extremists to isolate Assad, rollback Shia expansion: A
declassified secret US government document obtained by the conservative public interest law firm, Judicial Watch,
shows that Western governments deliberately allied with al-Qaeda and other Islamist extremist groups to topple
Syrian dictator Bashir al-Assad.

The document reveals that in coordination with the Gulf states and Turkey, the West intentionally sponsored violent Islamist
groups to destabilize Assad, and that these supporting powers desired the emergence of a Salafist Principality in Syria to
isolate the Syrian regime.

According to the newly declassified US document, the Pentagon foresaw the likely rise of the Islamic State as a direct
consequence of this strategy, and warned that it could destabilize Iraq.

Despite anticipating that Western, Gulf state and Turkish support for the Syrian opposition - which included al-Qaeda in
Iraq - could lead to the emergence of an Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), the document provides no indication of any
decision to reverse the policy of support to the Syrian rebels. On the contrary, the emergence of an al-Qaeda affiliated
Salafist Principality as a result is described as a strategic opportunity to isolate Assad.

Hypocrisy

The revelations contradict the official line of Western governments on their policies in Syria, and raise disturbing questions
about secret Western support for violent extremists abroad, while using the burgeoning threat of terror to justify excessive
mass surveillance and crackdowns on civil liberties at home.

Among the batch of documents obtained by Judicial Watch through a federal lawsuit, released earlier this week, is a US
Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document then classified as secret, dated 12th August 2012.

The DIA provides military intelligence in support of planners, policymakers and operations for the US Department of
Defense and intelligence community.

So far, media reporting has focused on the evidence that the Obama administration knew of arms supplies from a Libyan
terrorist stronghold to rebels in Syria.
Some outlets have reported the US intelligence communitys internal prediction of the rise of ISIS. Yet none have accurately
acknowledged the disturbing details exposing how the West knowingly fostered a sectarian, al-Qaeda-driven rebellion in
Syria.

Charles Shoebridge, a former British Army and Metropolitan Police counter-terrorism intelligence officer, said:

Given the political leanings of the organisation that obtained these documents, its unsurprising that the main
emphasis given to them thus far has been an attempt to embarrass Hilary Clinton regarding what was known about
the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi in 2012.

However, the documents also contain far less publicized revelations that raise vitally important questions of the
Wests governments and media in their support of Syrias rebellion.

The Wests Islamists

The newly declassified DIA document from 2012 confirms that the main component of the anti-Assad rebel forces by this
time comprised Islamist insurgents affiliated to groups that would lead to the emergence of ISIS. Despite this, these groups
were to continue receiving support from Western militaries and their regional allies.

Noting that the Salafist [sic], the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI [al-Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the
insurgency in Syria, the document states that the West, Gulf countries, and Turkey support the opposition, while Russia,
China and Iran support the [Assad] regime.

The 7-page DIA document states that al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), the precursor to the Islamic State in Iraq, (ISI) which became
the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, supported the Syrian opposition from the beginning, both ideologically and through the
media.

The formerly secret Pentagon report notes that the rise of the insurgency in Syria has increasingly taken a sectarian
direction, attracting diverse support from Sunni religious and tribal powers across the region.

In a section titled The Future Assumptions of the Crisis, the DIA report predicts that while Assads regime will
survive, retaining control over Syrian territory, the crisis will continue to escalate into proxy war".
The document also recommends the creation of safe havens under international sheltering, similar to what transpired in
Libya when Benghazi was chosen as the command centre for the temporary government.

In Libya, anti-Gaddafi rebels, most of whom were al-Qaeda affiliated militias, were protected by NATO safe havens (aka no
fly zones).

Supporting powers want ISIS entity

In a strikingly prescient prediction, the Pentagon document explicitly forecasts the probable declaration of an Islamic State
through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria.

Nevertheless, Western countries, the Gulf states and Turkey are supporting these efforts by Syrian opposition forces
fighting to control the eastern areas (Hasaka and Der Zor), adjacent to Western Iraqi provinces (Mosul and Anbar):

there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist Principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka
and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian
regime, which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran).

The secret Pentagon document thus provides extraordinary confirmation that the US-led coalition currently fighting ISIS, had
three years ago welcomed the emergence of an extremist Salafist Principality in the region as a way to undermine Assad,
and block off the strategic expansion of Iran. Crucially, Iraq is labeled as an integral part of this Shia expansion.

The establishment of such a Salafist Principality in eastern Syria, the DIA document asserts, is exactly what the
supporting powers to the [Syrian] opposition want. Earlier on, the document repeatedly describes those supporting
powers as the West, Gulf countries, and Turkey.

Further on, the document reveals that Pentagon analysts were acutely aware of the dire risks of this strategy, yet
ploughed ahead anyway.

The establishment of such a Salafist Principality in eastern Syria, it says, would create the ideal atmosphere for AQI to
return to its old pockets in Mosul and Ramadi. Last summer, ISIS conquered Mosul in Iraq, and just this month has also
taken control of Ramadi.

Such a quasi-state entity will provide:

a renewed momentum under the presumption of unifying the jihad among Sunni Iraq and Syria, and the rest of
the Sunnis in the Arab world against what it considers one enemy.

ISI could also declare an Islamic State through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, which
will create grave danger in regards to unifying Iraq and the protection of territory.

The 2012 DIA document is an Intelligence Information Report (IIR), not a finally evaluated intelligence assessment, but its
contents are vetted before distribution. The report was circulated throughout the US intelligence community, including to the
State Department, Central Command, the Department of Homeland Security, the CIA, FBI, among other agencies.
In response to my questions about the strategy, the British government simply denied the Pentagon reports startling
revelations of deliberate Western sponsorship of violent extremists in Syria. A British Foreign Office spokesperson said:

AQ and ISIL are proscribed terrorist organisations. The UK opposes all forms of terrorism. AQ, ISIL, and their
affiliates pose a direct threat to the UKs national security.

We are part of a military and political coalition to defeat ISIL in Iraq and Syria, and are working with international
partners to counter the threat from AQ and other terrorist groups in that region. In Syria we have always supported
those moderate opposition groups who oppose the tyranny of Assad and the brutality of the extremists.

The DIA did not respond to request for comment.

Strategic asset for regime-change

Security analyst Shoebridge, however, who has tracked Western support for Islamist terrorists in Syria since the beginning
of the war, pointed out that the secret Pentagon intelligence report exposes fatal contradictions at the heart of official
pronunciations:

Throughout the early years of the Syria crisis, the US and UK governments, and almost universally the Wests
mainstream media, promoted Syrias rebels as moderate, liberal, secular, democratic, and therefore deserving of
the Wests support.

Given that these documents wholly undermine this assessment, its significant that the Wests media has now,
despite their immense significance, almost entirely ignored them.

According to Brad Hoff, a former US Marine who served during the early years of the Iraq War and as a 9/11 first responder
at the Marine Corps Headquarters Battalion in Quantico from 2000 to 2004, the just released Pentagon report for the first
time provides stunning affirmation that:
US intelligence predicted the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS), but instead of clearly
delineating the group as an enemy, the report envisions the terror group as a US strategic asset.

Hoff, who is managing editor of Levant Report - an online publication run by Texas-based educators who have direct
experience of the Middle East - points out that the DIA document matter-of-factly states that the rise of such an extremist
Salafist political entity in the region offers a tool for regime change in Syria.

The DIA intelligence report shows, he said, that the rise of ISIS only became possible in the context of the Syrian
insurgency -

there is no mention of US troop withdrawal from Iraq as a catalyst for Islamic States rise, which is the contention of
innumerable politicians and pundits.

The report demonstrates that:

The establishment of a Salafist Principality in Eastern Syria is exactly what the external powers supporting the
opposition want (identified as the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey) in order to weaken the Assad government.

The rise of a Salafist quasi-state entity that might expand into Iraq, and fracture that country, was therefore clearly foreseen
by US intelligence as likely - but nevertheless strategically useful - blowback from the Wests commitment to isolating
Syria.

Complicity

Critics of the US-led strategy in the region have repeatedly raised questions about the role of coalition allies in
intentionally providing extensive support to Islamist terrorist groups in the drive to destabilize the Assad regime in
Syria.
The conventional wisdom is that the US government did not retain sufficient oversight on the funding to anti-Assad rebel
groups, which was supposed to be monitored and vetted to ensure that only moderate groups were supported.

However, the newly declassified Pentagon report proves unambiguously that years before ISIS launched its concerted
offensive against Iraq, the US intelligence community was fully aware that Islamist militants constituted the core of Syrias
sectarian insurgency.

Despite that, the Pentagon continued to support the Islamist insurgency, even while anticipating the probability that doing so
would establish an extremist Salafi stronghold in Syria and Iraq.

As Shoebridge told me;

The documents show that not only did the US government at the latest by August 2012 know the true extremist nature and
likely outcome of Syrias rebellion - namely, the emergence of ISIS - but that this was considered an advantage for US
foreign policy. This also suggests a decision to spend years in an effort to deliberately mislead the Wests public, via a
compliant media, into believing that Syrias rebellion was overwhelmingly moderate.

Annie Machon

Annie Machon, a former MI5 intelligence officer who blew the whistle in the 1990s on MI6 funding of al-Qaeda to
assassinate Libyas former leader Colonel Gaddafi, similarly said of the revelations:

This is no surprise to me. Within individual countries there are always multiple intelligence agencies with
competing agendas.

She explained that MI6s Libya operation in 1996, which resulted in the deaths of innocent people, happened at precisely
the time when MI5 was setting up a new section to investigate al-Qaeda.
This strategy was repeated on a grand scale in the 2011 NATO intervention in Libya, said Machon, where the CIA and MI6
were:

supporting the very same Libyan groups, resulting in a failed state, mass murder, displacement and anarchy.
So the idea that elements of the American military-security complex have enabled the development of ISIS after
their failed attempt to get NATO to once again intervene is part of an established pattern.

And they remain indifferent to the sheer scale of human suffering that is unleashed as a result of such game-
playing.

Divide and rule

Several US government officials have conceded that their closest allies in the anti-ISIS coalition were funding violent
extremist Islamist groups that became integral to ISIS.

US Vice President Joe Biden, for instance, admitted last year that Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar and Turkey had
funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to Islamist rebels in Syria that metamorphosed into ISIS.

But he did not admit what this internal Pentagon document demonstrates - that the entire covert strategy was sanctioned
and supervised by the US, Britain, France, Israel and other Western powers.
The strategy appears to fit a policy scenario identified by a recent US Army-commissioned RAND Corp report.

The report, published four years before the DIA document, called for the US to capitalise on the Shia-Sunni conflict by
taking the side of the conservative Sunni regimes in a decisive fashion and working with them against all Shiite
empowerment movements in the Muslim world.

The US would need to contain Iranian power and influence in the Gulf by shoring up the traditional Sunni regimes in Saudi
Arabia, Egypt, and Pakistan. Simultaneously, the US must maintain a strong strategic relationship with the Iraqi Shiite
government despite its Iran alliance.

The RAND report confirmed that the divide and rule strategy was already being deployed to create divisions in the
jihadist camp. Today in Iraq such a strategy is being used at the tactical level.

The report observed that the US was forming temporary alliances with al-Qaeda affiliated nationalist insurgent groups
that have fought the US for four years in the form of weapons and cash. Although these nationalists have cooperated with
al-Qaeda against US forces, they are now being supported to exploit the common threat that al-Qaeda now poses to both
parties.

The 2012 DIA document, however, further shows that while sponsoring purportedly former al-Qaeda insurgents in Iraq to
counter al-Qaeda, Western governments were simultaneously arming al-Qaeda insurgents in Syria.

The revelation from an internal US intelligence document that the very US-led coalition supposedly fighting Islamic State
today, knowingly created ISIS in the first place, raises troubling questions about recent government efforts to justify the
expansion of state anti-terror powers.
In the wake of the rise of ISIS, intrusive new measures to combat extremism including mass surveillance, the Orwellian
prevent duty and even plans to enable government censorship of broadcasters, are being pursued on both sides of the
Atlantic, much of which disproportionately targets activists, journalists and ethnic minorities, especially Muslims.

Yet the new Pentagon report reveals that, contrary to Western government claims, the primary cause of the threat comes
from their own deeply misguided policies of secretly sponsoring Islamist terrorism for dubious geopolitical purposes.

War is Peace: US Needs External Enemy to Ensure Internal Unity

The object is not only about national unity, but the underlying principle has always been to keep the mind occupied
and distracted while they empty the national treasury of each nation involved including America itself.

The US Cabal keeps fabricating pseudo-enemies to sustain the need for their services, i.e. governance and
security.

When everybody is prosperous and secured, who needs government?

War is Peace: US Needs External Enemy to Ensure Internal Unity

Since the end of the Cold War the US has fabricated two enemies for itself Radical Islam and Russia but now it
has to choose only one, and the best candidate is Radical Islam, according to French historian, diplomat and
novelist Jean-Christophe Rufin.

The totalitarian party principles from George Orwell's "1984"

The US needs an external enemy to ensure community cohesion, Jean-Christophe Rufin said in an interview with the
French Le Figaro newspaper.
American society, similar to the Roman Empire is in need of an external uniting enemy. Since 1991, in its striving
not to miss out on one, the US has made up two, he said.

On the one hand, he says, by overthrowing Arabic-Muslim secular regimes, rightfully labelled as dictatorships destined
for public reproof, the US and its European allies have contributed to the emergence of a considerable number of Islamist
enemies (starting with Bin Laden and continuing up to the Islamic State) financed by some oil monarchies of the Persian
Gulf region.

On the other the US has pursued its systematic policy of besieging post-Soviet Russia. From Georgia to Mongolia and
through the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) the US has laid the ground for a new cold war.

Now, the historian says, the US faces a choice of keeping only one enemy. The best candidate is Radical Islam, he says.

However we should not forget the prophecy of Alexis de Tocqueville, who saw Russia as the only continental
power capable of competing with the US, Rufin stated.

Alexis de Tocqueville (1805 1859) was a French political thinker and historian, who was famous for his analysis of the
American democratic system; best known for his works Democracy in America and The Old Regime and the Revolution.

Nothing To Celebrate In ANZAC: The Bloody History Of The British Empire


From: Solidarity

While it is right to remember those who were duped into giving their lives by believing in lies, The
Gallipoli campaign was not about democracy, but defending the profits and colonies of the British
empire, one of the most brutal the world has seen
Related: Cowardly Firing of Australian State-Funded TV Journalist Highlights the Wests Real Religion

The 100 year anniversary commemorations of Gallipoli will glorify it as sacrifice for a noble cause. Tony Abbott has
called it part of a war that shaped our nation. In 2012 then Prime Minister Julia Gillard declared on Anzac Day that,
all of us inhabit the freedom the Anzacs won for us. But Gallipoli and the First World War was no fight for freedom
or democracy.

The landing at Gallipoli was an invasion of a Middle Eastern country, modern Turkey, in the service of what was, at the time,
the worlds largest and most powerful empire. Australian troops at Gallipoli were among almost half a million British, Indian,
New Zealand and French colonial troops who landed there.

At the time, Australian troops were celebrated as dying in the service of empire. As historian Mark McKenna has pointed out,
For decades following 1915, the Imperial context of Anzac Day had been fundamental to the rituals and meaning of 25 April;
newspapers, for example, commonly placed the kings or queens message on the front page.

Tony Abbott has lined up with conservative historians to declare the war necessary because, Europe was at risk from
Prussian militarism. But the First World War was fundamentally a clash between rival European powers for control of colonies
and profits. It was a product of fully modern capitalist economies engaged in brutal industrial slaughter.

Bloody empire

Today some still defend the British empire as a civilising force that helped bring economic development to colonies like India.
In reality it was a brutal arrangement through which Britain plundered the world, based on sheer military terror and bloodshed.

Britain began constructing its empire in Ireland, effectively its first colony. In 1609 it drove local peasants off their lands and
settled English and Scottish colonists in the plantation of Ulster as an effort to maintain control. Huge rents were imposed on
Irish peasant farmers that kept them in poverty.

The failure of the potato crop between 1845 and 1852 caused a famine in which one million died. Although Ireland was still
producing enough to feed the population, the British government allowed merchants and landlords to continue exporting grain
abroad for profits while its people starved.
After 1690 Britain shipped three million African slaves to its profitable sugar plantations in the Caribbean. This regime of
unimaginable brutality relied on literally working slaves to death: the lifespan of those that survived the trip across the Atlantic
was just seven to ten years. Savage punishments were required to maintain it. The Baptist missionary William Knibb recorded
that, flogging on the estates is as common as eating almost.

There were constant slave revolts and resistance. In 1791 a revolt swept the French slave colony of St Dominique, spreading
across much of the rest of the Caribbean. By 1798 Britain had lost 55,000 soldiers putting down the rebellions. A further
massive revolt followed in Jamaica in 1831.

It was these rebellions that convinced the British ruling class of the need to abolish slavery. The importance of the plantations
in generating their wealth was also in decline as Britain developed as an industrial power. Yet even when they ended slavery
in 1833, it was the slave owners who received compensation, not the slaves.

New world horrors

The colonisation of the new world across North America, New Zealand and Australia involved slaughter and genocide
against the indigenous inhabitants. The first British colony in north America was established in 1607 in Virginia.

When the settlers struggled to feed themselves at first, the local indigenous people gave them food that helped them survive.
But once they were established the British set out on a policy of extermination. They burned crops and villages, and
massacred women and children in punitive raids.

When the local Powhatan Indians finally struck back after years of harassment and provocation, killing a number of the
settlers, the English refused to discuss peace and spent the next decade hunting down and killing the local population. In
1623 they invited over 100 Powhatan to a banquet, supposedly to discuss peace, and poisoned them.

Britains loss of its American colonies spurred it to grab larger parts of Asia and Africa. The British East India Company began
the plunder of the subcontinent with its own private army. It ruled large parts of India from 1757 until 1858 when the British
government took full control.

The East India Company established a monopoly on all trade out of India. The countrys textile industry was destroyed by
seizing Indian cotton for export to British factories, where it was turned into cheap cloth that flooded the Indian market.

British rule also resulted in frequent famines that killed between 12 and 29 million Indians, according to Mike Daviss in his
book Late Victorian Holocausts.

In 1876 when famine hit there was an overall surplus of rice and wheat in India but, as in Ireland, the British Viceroy refused to
stop its export to Britain. While peasants starved a law was passed which banned at the pain of imprisonment private relief
donations that potentially interfered with the market fixing of grain prices. Again government policy imposed starvation in
defence of British profits.

Empires at war

It was these spoils that Britain and its armies were defending in the First World War.

Egypt had been invaded in 1882 in order to ensure the repayment of debts run up to British and French investors on
extortionate terms. A new nationalist government had attempted to throw off supervision by the British and French
governments. The decisive battle at Tel-el-Kabir was more like a massacre, with 57 British soldiers killed and between 2000
and 10,000 Egyptians.

During the First World War, British troops based in Egypt, including Australian light horse regiments, invaded the Ottoman
provinces in Palestine and Mesopotamia.

At the wars conclusion Britain took control of modern day Iraq and Jordan as well as Palestine, while France gained Lebanon
and Syria. Promises about establishing an independent Arab state, which Britain made during the war to secure military
support against the Ottomans, were simply dropped.

When Egypt staged a nationalist rebellion in 1919, Australian troops were used to help crush it. Australian light horse units
had been waiting in Egypt to sail for home at the end of the war. But with few other British troops in the country they were
ordered to help re-establish British rule. Australians were sent out to machine gun crowds of protesters. By the time the revolt
was crushed in April 1919, over 1000 Egyptians had been killed, 1500 jailed and 57 hanged.
Winston Churchill, the man who ordered the assault on Gallipoli, sent in British planes dropping poison gas to put down the
uprising in Iraq which followed in 1920.

After the Second World War the US succeeded Britain as the worlds foremost imperial power. While it stepped back from use
of direct imperial control, it has proved just as willing to overthrow governments that defy its wishes and which harm the
interests of US multinationals.

Just as Australia sat under the British umbrella in the First World War, it now works in partnership with US imperialism, joining
its imperial adventures from Vietnam to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Nothing in this tradition of empire and plunder is worth celebrating.

All Wars Are Bankers' Wars


April 14 2015 | From: MichaelRivero / Various Sources

A very eloquent and relatively concise video discourse on how and why the title of this piece is so
tragically true, followed by a very detailed article for those who wish to read more.

This really is a must see / must read piece to be aware of the real history of banking and
warmongering over the last 100 years - along with the how and why such nefarious plans were
implemented; and to what ends.

This exposes the same plan that is being rolled out globally, not just in the United States.

"The common enemy of all human kind are private central banks issuing the public
currency as a loan at interest, and as history will show, they will do anything up to, and
including global war - to keep their lock on yours and your children's economic wellbeing
and productivity.

We are not a free society. Media will tell us that we are free, but we are not free.

We are slaves, our slave chains are made of paper - and that paper is the Federal Reserve
note [including the central bankster issued debt-based-notes of every other country]."

Too few of our leaders have tried to stand up to this system of enslavement, usually with lethal results. But if all of the people
of the world stood up at the same time and said "No more private central banks", it will come crashing down, just as slavery
did, just as rule by divine right did and we will be embarking on a new era in human history where the emphasis on human
development is on the people and not on the money junkies.

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but
leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back
again.

However, take it away from them, and all the fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this
world would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you wish to remain slaves of the Bankers and pay for the
cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits."

- Sir Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England in the 1920s, the second richest man in Britain

I know many people have a great deal of difficulty comprehending just how many wars are started for no other purpose than to
force private central banks onto nations, so let me share a few examples, so that you understand why the US Government is
mired in so many wars against so many foreign nations. There is ample precedent for this.

The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency act, which forced the colonists to
conduct their business only using printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England at interest.
Interest Bearing bank note from the Bank of England, 1764

"The bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing."

- William Paterson, founder of the Bank of England in 1694


After the revolution, the new United States adopted a
radically different economic system in which the government
issued its own value-based money, so that private banks like
the Bank of England were not siphoning off the wealth of the
people through interest-bearing bank notes.

"The refusal of King George 3rd to allow the


colonies to operate an honest money system, which
freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the
money manipulators, was probably the prime cause
of the revolution."

- Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father

Following the revolution, the US Government actually took


steps to keep the bankers out of the new government!

"Any person holding any office or any stock in any


institution in the nature of a bank for issuing or
discounting bills or notes payable to bearer or order,
cannot be a member of the House whilst he holds
such office or stock."

- Third Congress of the United States Senate,


23rd of December, 1793, signed by the
President, George Washington

But bankers are nothing if not dedicated to their schemes to


King George III
acquire your wealth, and know full well how easy it is to
corrupt a nation's leaders.

Just one year after Mayer Amschel Rothschild had uttered his infamous "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care
not who makes the laws", the bankers succeeded in setting up a new Private Central Bank called the First Bank of the United
States, largely through the efforts of the Rothschild's chief US supporter, Alexander Hamilton.
Founded in 1791, by the end of its twenty year charter the
First Bank of the United States had almost ruined the
nation's economy, while enriching the bankers.

Congress refused to renew the charter and signaled their


intention to go back to a state issued value based currency
on which the people paid no interest at all to any banker.

This resulted in a threat from Nathan Mayer Rothschild


against the US Government, "Either the application for
renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will
find itself involved in a most disastrous war."

Congress still refused to renew the charter for the First


Bank of the United States, whereupon Nathan Mayer
Rothschild railed, "Teach those impudent Americans a
lesson! Bring them back to colonial status!"

The British Prime Minister at the time, Spencer Perceval


was adamently opposed to war with the United States,
primarily because the majority of England's military might
was occupied with the ongoing Napoleonic wars.

Spencer Perceval was concerned that Britain might not


prevail in a new American war, a concern shared by many
in the British government.
Alexander Hamilton

The First Bank of the United States

Then, Spencer Perceval was assassinated (the only British Prime Minister to be assassinated in office) and replaced by
Robert Banks Jenkinson, the 2nd Earl of Liverpool, who was fully supportive of a war to recapture the colonies.
"If my sons did not want wars, there would be
none."

- Gutle Schnaper, wife of Mayer Amschel


Rothschild and mother of his five sons

Financed at virtually no interest by the Rothschild controlled


Bank of England, Britain then provoked the war of 1812 to
recolonize the United States and force them back into the
slavery of the Bank of England, or to plunge the United
States into so much debt they would be forced to accept a
new private central bank.
Click for larger image of the Geneva Gazette for July 1, 1812, reporting
And the plan worked. Even though the War of 1812 was won
on the assassination of Spencer Perceval together with the declaration
of the War of 1812 by the United States, Congress was forced to grant a new
charter for yet another private bank issuing the public
currency as loans at interest, the Second Bank of the United
States.

Once again, private bankers were in control of the nation's money supply and cared not who made the laws or how many
British and American soldiers had to die for it.

The Second Bank of the United States


Bank Note from the Second Bank of the United States

Once again the nation was plunged into debt, unemployment, and poverty by the predations of the private central bank, and in
1832 Andrew Jackson successfully campaigned for his second term as President under the slogan, "Jackson And No Bank!"
True to his word, Jackson succeeds in blocking the renewal of the charter for the Second Bank of the United States.

"Gentlemen! I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States. I have had men
watching you for a long time, and am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the
breadstuffs of the country.

When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me
that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true,
gentlemen, but that is your sin!

Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and
thieves. I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal, (bringing his fist down on the table) I will rout you
out!"

- Andrew Jackson, shortly before ending the charter of the Second Bank of the United States.

From the original minutes of the Philadelphia committee of citizens sent to meet with President Jackson (February
1834), according to Andrew Jackson and the Bank of the United States (1928) by Stan V. Henkels
Shortly after President Jackson (the only American President
to actually pay off the National Debt) ended the Second
Bank of the United States, there was an attempted
assassination which failed when both pistols used by the
assassin, Richard Lawrence, failed to fire.

Lawrence later said that with Jackson dead, "Money would


be more plenty."

President Zachary Taylor opposed the creation of a new


Private Central Bank, owing to the historical abuses of the
First and Second Banks of the United States.

"The idea of a national bank is dead, and will not be


revived in my time."

- Zachary Taylor

Taylor died on July 9, 1850 after eating a bowl of cherries


and milk rumored to have been poisoned. The symptoms he
displayed are consistent with acute arsenic poisoning.

President James Buchanan also opposed a private central


bank. During the panic of 1857 he attempted to set limits on
banks issuing more loans than they had actual funds, and to
require all issued bank notes to be backed by Federal
Government assets.

He was poisoned with arsenic and survived, although 38


News report of Jackson shutting down the Second Bank of the United other people at the dinner died.
States, Geneva Gazette, October 2, 1833
The public school system is as subservient to the bankers'
wishes to keep certain history from you, just as the corporate
media is subservient to Monsanto's wishes to keep the
dangers of GMOs from you, and the global warming cult's
wishes to conceal from you that the Earth has actually been
cooling for the last 16 years.

Thus is should come as little surprise that much of the real


reasons for the events of the Civil War are not well known to
the average American.

"The few who understand the system will either be


so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon
its favours that there will be no opposition from that
class, while on the other hand, the great body of
people, mentally incapable of comprehending the
tremendous advantage that capital derives from the
system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and
perhaps without even suspecting that the system is
inimical to their interests."

- The Rothschild brothers of London writing to


associates in New York, 1863
President Zachary Taylor, ca 1850 When the Confederacy seceded from the United States, the
bankers once again saw the opportunity for a rich harvest of
debt, and offered to fund Lincoln's efforts to bring the south
back into the union, but at 30% interest.

Lincoln remarked that he would not free the black man by


enslaving the white man to the bankers and using his
authority as President, issued a new government currency,
the greenback. This was a direct threat to the wealth and
power of the central bankers, who quickly responded.

Lincoln's Greenback - Click for larger image

President James Buchanon

"If this mischievous financial policy, which has its


origin in North America, shall become endurated
down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish
its own money without cost.

It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have


all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It
will become prosperous without precedent in the
history of the world.

The brains, and wealth of all countries will go to


North America. That country must be destroyed or it
will destroy every monarchy on the globe."

- The London Times responding to Lincoln's


decision to issue government Greenbacks to
finance the Civil War, rather than agree to
private banker's loans at 30% interest.

In 1872 New York bankers sent a letter to every bank in the


United States, urging them to fund newspapers that opposed
government-issued money (Lincoln's greenbacks).

"Dear Sir: It is advisable to do all in your power to sustain


such prominent daily and weekly newspapers... as will
oppose the issuing of greenback paper money, and that you
also withhold patronage or favors from all applicants who are
not willing to oppose the Government issue of money. Let
the Government issue the coin and the banks issue the
President Abraham Lincoln paper money of the country...

[T]o restore to circulation the Government issue of money, will be to provide the people with money, and will therefore
seriously affect your individual profit as bankers and lenders."

- Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler
"It will not do to allow the greenback, as it is called, to circulate as money any length of time, as we cannot control that." --
Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler "Slavery is likely to be abolished
by the war power, and chattel slavery destroyed.

This, I and my European friends are in favor of, for slavery is but the owning of labor and carries with it the care for the
laborer, while the European plan, led on by England, is for capital to control labor by controlling the wages. THIS CAN BE
DONE BY CONTROLLING THE MONEY."

- Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler

Goaded by the private bankers, much of Europe supported the Confederacy against the Union, with the expectation that
victory over Lincoln would mean the end of the Greenback. France and Britain considered an outright attack on the United
States to aid the confederacy, but were held at bay by Russia, which had just ended the serfdom system and had a state
central bank similar to the system the United States had been founded on.

Left free of European intervention, the Union won the war,


and Lincoln announced his intention to go on issuing
greenbacks.

Following Lincoln's assassination, the Greenbacks were


pulled from circulation and the American people forced to go
back to an economy based on bank notes borrowed at
interest from the private bankers.

Tsar Alexander II, who authorized Russian military


assistance to Lincoln, was subsequently the victim of
multiple attempts on his life in 1866, 1879, and 1880, until
his assassination in 1881.

With the end of Lincoln's Greenbacks, the US could no


longer create its own interest free money and was
manipulated during the term of President Ruthford B. Hayes
into borrowing from the Rothschilds banking system in 1878,
restoring to the Rothschilds control of the US economy they
had lost under Andrew Jackson.

Messrs. Rothschild & Sons to Mr. Sherman.


[Cable message.]

April 12,1878.
Tsar Alexander II of Russia, who prevented France and Britain from Hon. John Sherman,
invading the US during the civil war. Secretary of the Treasury, Washington D. C.:

Very pleased we have entered into relations again


with American Government. Shall do our best to
make the business successful.

ROTHSCHILDS.

James A. Garfield was elected President in 1880 on a


platform of government control of the money supply.

"The chief duty of the National Government in


connection with the currency of the country is to coin
money and declare its value.
Grave doubts have been entertained whether
Congress is authorized by the Constitution to make
any form of paper money legal tender.

The present issue of United States notes has been


sustained by the necessities of war; but such paper
should depend for its value and currency upon its
convenience in use and its prompt redemption in
coin at the will of the holder, and not upon its
compulsory circulation.

These notes are not money, but promises to pay


money. If the holders demand it, the promise should
be kept."

- James Garfield

"By the experience of commercial nations in all ages


it has been found that gold and silver afford the only
safe foundation for a monetary system.

Confusion has recently been created by variations in


the relative value of the two metals, but I confidently
believe that arrangements can be made between
the leading commercial nations which will secure the
general use of both metals.

President James Garfield Congress should provide that the compulsory


coinage of silver now required by law may not
disturb our monetary system by driving either metal
out of circulation.

If possible, such an adjustment should be made that


the purchasing power of every coined dollar will be
exactly equal to its debt-paying power in all the
markets of the world."

- James Garfield

"He who controls the money supply of a nation


controls the nation."

- James Garfield

President William McKinley

Garfield was shot on July 2, 1881 and died of his wounds several weeks later. Chester A. Arthur succeeded Garfield as
President.
In 1896, William McKinley was elected President in the middle of a depression-driven debate over gold-backed government
currency versus bank notes borrowed at interest from private banks.

McKinley favored gold-backed currencies and a balanced government budget which would free the public from accumulating
debt.

"Our financial system needs some revision; our money is all good now, but its value must not further be
threatened.

It should all be put upon an enduring basis, not subject to easy attack, nor its stability to doubt or dispute. Our
currency should continue under the supervision of the Government.

The several forms of our paper money offer, in my judgment, a constant embarrassment to the Government and a
safe balance in the Treasury."

- William McKinley

McKinley was shot by an out-of-work anarchist on September 14, 1901, in Buffalo, NY, succumbing to his wounds a few days
later. He was suceeded in office by Theodore Roosevelt.

Finally, in 1913, the Private Central Bankers of Europe, in particular the Rothschilds of Great Britain and the Warburgs of
Germany, met with their American financial collaborators on Jekyll Island, Georgia to form a new banking cartel with the
express purpose of forming the Third Bank of the United States, with the aim of placing complete control of the United States
money supply once again under the control of private bankers.

Owing to hostility over the previous banks, the name was changed to "The Federal Reserve" system in order to grant the new
bank a quasi-governmental image, but in fact it is a privately owned bank, no more "Federal" than Federal Express.
The Federal Reserve; it is neither "Federal" nor does it have any actual "Reserves", creating as it does money out of thin air.

In 2012, the Federal Reserve attempted to rebuff a Freedom of Information Lawsuit by Bloomberg News on the grounds that
as a private banking corporation and not actually a part of the government, the Freedom of Information Act did not apply
to the "trade secret" operations of the Federal Reserve.

"When you or I write a check, there must be sufficient funds in our account to cover the check; but when the
Federal Reserve writes a check, there is no bank deposit on which that check is drawn. When the Federal Reserve
writes a check, it is creating money." -- From the Boston Federal Reserve Bank pamphlet, "Putting it Simply."

"Neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a 'dollar' bill is just a piece of paper.
Deposits are merely book entries."

- "Modern Money Mechanics Workbook" - Federal Reserve of Chicago, 1975

"I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can and do create money. And they who
control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hand the destiny of
the people."

- Reginald McKenna, as Chairman of the Midland Bank, addressing stockholders in 1924

"States, most especially the large hegemonic ones, such as the United States and Great Britain, are controlled by
the international central banking system, working through secret agreements at the Bank for International
Settlements (BIS), and operating through national central banks (such as the Bank of England and the Federal
Reserve)...

The same international banking cartel that controls the United States today previously controlled Great Britain and
held it up as the international hegemon.
When the British order faded, and was replaced by the United States, the US ran the global economy. However,
the same interests are served.

States will be used and discarded at will by the international banking cartel; they are simply tools."

- Andrew Gavin Marshall

1913 proved to be a transformative year for the nation's economy, first with the passage of the 16th "income tax"
Amendment and the false claim that it had been ratified.

"I think if you were to go back and and try to find and review the ratification of the 16th amendment, which was the
internal revenue, the income tax, I think if you went back and examined that carefully, you would find that a
sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment."

- U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox, Sullivan Vs. United States, 2003.

Later that same year, and apparently unwilling to risk another questionable amendment, Congress passed the Federal
Reserve Act over Christmas holiday 1913, while members of Congress opposed to the measure were at home.

This was a very underhanded deal, as the Constitution explicitly vests Congress with the authority to issue the public
currency, does not authorize its delegation, and thus should have required a new Amendment to transfer that authority to a
private bank.

But pass it Congress did, and President Woodrow Wilson signed it as he promised the bankers he would in exchange for
generous campaign contributions.
Woodrow Wilson later regretted that decision.

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined


my country.

A great industrial nation is now controlled by its


system of credit.

We are no longer a government by free opinion, no


longer a government by conviction and the vote of
the majority, but a government by the opinion and
duress of a small group of dominant men."

- Woodrow Wilson 1919

Thomas Edison, arguably the most brilliant man of the age,


was also well aware of the fraud of private central banks.

"People who will not turn a shovel full of dirt on the


project nor contribute a pound of material, will collect
more money from the United States than will the
People who supply all the material and do all the
work.

This is the terrible thing about interest ...


News report of Wilson's signing the Federal Reserve Act. Under the
Constitution, only a new Amendment could transfer the government's
But here is the point: If the Nation can issue a dollar
authority to create the currency to a private party. bond it can issue a dollar bill.

The element that makes the bond good makes the


bill good also.

The difference between the bond and the bill is that


the bond lets the money broker collect twice the
amount of the bond and an additional 20%.

Whereas the currency, the honest sort provided by


the Constitution pays nobody but those who
contribute in some useful way.

It is absurd to say our Country can issue bonds


and cannot issue currency.

Both are promises to pay, but one fattens the usurer


and the other helps the People.

If the currency issued by the People were no good,


then the bonds would be no good, either.

It is a terrible situation when the Government, to


insure the National Wealth, must go in debt and
submit to ruinous interest charges at the hands of
men who control the fictitious value of gold."

- Thomas A. Edison

The next year, World War One started, and it is


important to remember that prior to the creation of the
Federal Reserve, there was no such thing as a world
war.

President Woodrow Wilson

In 1913, the Rothschild KM was able to establish a beachhead by bribing crooked, treasonous members of Congress to pass the illegal,
Unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act on Christmas Eve without a required quorum. The Act was then signed by a crooked, bought off President, who
was a traitor to America, like the members of Congress who voted for it.
World War One started between Austria-Hungary and
Serbia with the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand.

Although the war started between Austria-Hungary and


Serbia, it quickly shifted to focus on Germany, whose
industrial capacity was seen as an economic threat to Great
Britain, who saw the decline of the British Pound as a result
of too much emphasis on financial activity to the neglect of
agriculture, industrial development, and infrastructure (not
unlike the present day United States).

Although pre-war Germany had a private central bank, it


was heavily restricted and inflation kept to reasonable
levels.

Under government control, investment was guaranteed to


internal economic development, and Germany was seen as
a major power.

So, in the media of the day, Germany was portrayed as the


prime opponent of World War One, and not just defeated,
but its industrial base flattened.

Following the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was ordered to


pay the war costs of all the participating nations, even
though Germany had not actually started the war.

This amounted to three times the value of all of Germany


Archduke Franz Ferdinand, whose assassination triggered World War itself.
One
Germany's private central bank, to whom Germany had
gone deeply into debt to pay the costs of the war, broke free
of government control, and massive inflation followed
(mostly triggered by currency speculators), permanently
trapping the German people in endless debt.

When the Weimar Republic collapsed economically, it


opened the door for the National Socialists to take power.

Their first financial move was to issue their own state


currency which was not borrowed from private central
bankers.

Freed from having to pay interest on the money in


circulation, Germany blossomed and quickly began to
rebuild its industry.

The media called it "The German Miracle".

TIME magazine lionized Hitler for the amazing improvement


in life for the German people and the explosion of German
industry, and even named him TIME Magazine's Man Of
The Year in 1938.

Once again, Germany's industrial output became a threat to


Great Britain.

Germany's state-issued value based currency was also a


direct threat to the wealth and power of the private central
banks, and as early as 1933 they started to organize a
global boycott against Germany to strangle this upstart
ruler who thought he could break free of private central
bankers!

Hitler as TIME's man of the year


"Should Germany merchandise (do business) again in the next 50 years we have led this war (WW1) in vain."

- Winston Churchill in The Times (1919)

"We will force this war upon Hitler, if he wants it or not."

- Winston Churchill (1936 broadcast)

"Germany becomes too powerful. We have to crush it."

- Winston Churchill (November 1936 speaking to US - General Robert E. Wood)

"This war is an English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany."

- Winston Churchill (- Autumn 1939 broadcast)

Click on the image above to view a larger version in a new window


As had been the case in World War One, Great Britain and other nations threatened by Germany's economic power looked
for an excuse to go to war, and as public anger in Germany grew over the boycott, Hitler foolishly gave them that excuse.
Years later, in a spirit of candor, the real reasons for that war were made clear.

"The war wasn't only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended
so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn't want to."

- Winston Churchill to Truman (Fultun, USA March 1946)

"Germany's unforgivable crime before WW2 was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system
and to build up an independent exchange system from which the world-finance couldn't profit anymore. ...We
butchered the wrong pig."

-Winston Churchill (The Second World War - Bern, 1960)

As a side note, we need to step back before WW2 and recall Marine Major General Smedley Butler. In 1933, Wall Street
bankers and financiers had bankrolled the successful coups by both Hitler and Mussolini. Brown Brothers Harriman in New
York was financing Hitler right up to the day war was declared with Germany.

And they decided that a fascist dictatorship in the United


States based on the one on Italy would be far better for their
business interests than Roosevelt's "New Deal" which
threatened massive wealth re-distribution to recapitalize the
working and middle class of America.

So the Wall Street tycoons recruited General Butler to lead


the overthrow of the US Government and install a
"Secretary of General Affairs" who would be answerable to
Wall Street and not the people, would crush social unrest
and shut down all labor unions.

General Butler pretended to go along with the scheme but


then exposed the plot to Congress. Congress, then as now
in the pocket of the Wall Street bankers, refused to act.

When Roosevelt learned of the planned coup he demanded


the arrest of the plotters, but the plotters simply reminded
Roosevelt that if any one of them were sent to prison, their
friends on Wall Street would deliberately collapse the still-
fragile economy and blame him for it.

Roosevelt was thus unable to act until the start of WW2, at


which time he prosecuted many of the plotters under the
Trading With The Enemy act.
Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler

The Congressional minutes into the coup were finally declassified in 1967, but rumors of the attempted coup became the
inspiration for the movie, "Seven Days in May" but with the true financial villains erased from the script.

"I spent 33 years and four months in active military service as a member of our country's most agile military force -
the Marine Corps.

I served in all commissioned ranks from second lieutenant to Major General. And during that period I spent more of
my time being a high - class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers.
In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. "I suspected I was just a part of a racket at the time.

Now I am sure of it.

Like all members of the military profession I never had an original thought until I left the service. My mental
faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of the higher-ups. This is typical with
everyone in the military service.

Thus I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti
and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in.

I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record of
racketeering is long.

I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-12. I brought light to the
Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916.

In China in 1927 I helped see to it that the Standard Oil went its way unmolested. During those years, I had, as the
boys in the back room would say, a swell racket.

I was rewarded with honors, medals and promotion. Looking back on it, I feel I might have given Al Capone a few
hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three city districts. I operated on three continents."

- General Smedley Butler, former US Marine Corps Commandant,1935

President John F. Kennedy

As President, John F. Kennedy understood the predatory nature of private central banking. He understood why Andrew fought
so hard to end the Second Bank of the United States. So Kennedy wrote and signed Executive Order 11110 which ordered
the US Treasury to issue a new public currency, the United States Note.
Presidents Kennedy and Soekarno

Kennedy was working with President Soekarno of Indonesia who was at that time the signatory for the Global Collateral
Accounts which were intended to be used for humanitarian purposes but which were subverted at the time of the Bretton-
Woods agreement at the end of WWII.

The intention of Kennedy and Soekarno was to end the reign of the globalist privately owned central banking system
- which is the main reason that Kennedy was killed, and for his part Soekarno remained under house arrest for the
rest of his life.

The efforts to regain control of the Global Collateral Accounts are now being led by Neil Keenan.

The West had been stealing from the Collateral Accounts for nearly 100 years but this has now been stopped by Neil Keenan
and his associates, who have gone to considerable expense and risk in their mission to ensure the Global Collateral Accounts
are accessible - for the humanitarian purposes for which they were established.
Kennedy's United States Note - with the lack of reference to the FEDERAL RESERVE

Kennedy's United States Notes were not borrowed from the Federal Reserve but created by the US Government and backed
by the silver stockpiles held by the US Government. It represented a return to the system of economics the United States had
been founded on, and was perfectly legal for Kennedy to do.

All told, some four and one half billion dollars went into public circulation, eroding interest payments to the Federal Reserve
and loosening their control over the nation. Five months later John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas Texas, and
the United States Notes pulled from circulation and destroyed (except for samples held by collectors).

John J. McCloy
John J. McCloy, President of the Chase Manhattan Bank, and President of the World Bank, was named to the Warren
Commission, presumably to make certain the banking dimensions behind the assassination were concealed from the public.

As we enter the eleventh year of what future history will most certainly describe as World War Three, we need to examine the
financial dimensions behind the wars.

Towards the end of World War Two, when it became obvious that the allies were going to win and dictate the post war
environment, the major world economic powers met at Bretton Woods, a luxury resort in New Hampshire in July of 1944, and
hammered out the Bretton Woods agreement for international finance.

The British Pound lost its position as the global trade and reserve currency to the US dollar (part of the price demanded by
Roosevelt in exchange for the US entry into the war). Absent the economic advantages of being the world's "go-to" currency,
Britain was forced to nationalize the Bank of England in 1946.

The Bretton Woods agreement, ratified in 1945, in addition to making the dollar the global reserve and trade currency,
obligated the signatory nations to tie their currencies to the dollar. The nations that ratified Bretton Woods did so on two
conditions. The first was that the Federal Reserve would refrain from over-printing the dollar as a means to loot real products
and produce from other nations in exchange for ink and paper; basically an imperial tax.

That assurance was backed up by the second requirement, which was that the US dollar would always be convertible to gold
at $35 per ounce.

The Bretton Woods resort, New Hampshire

The Federal Reserve, being a private bank and not answerable to the US Government, did start overprinting paper dollars,
and much of the perceived prosperity of the 1950s and 1960s was the result of foreign nations' obligations to accept the paper
notes as being worth gold at the rate of $35 an ounce.

Then in 1970, France looked at the huge pile of paper notes sitting in their vaults, for which real French products like wine and
cheese had been traded, and notified the United States government that they would exercise their option under Bretton
Woods to return the paper notes for gold at the $35 per ounce exchange rate.

The United States had nowhere near the gold to redeem the paper notes, so on August 15th, 1971, Richard Nixon
"temporarily" suspended the gold convertibility of the US Federal Reserve Notes.
Nixon announced the end of gold convertability

Later termed the "Nixon shock", this move effectively ended Bretton Woods and many global currencies started to delink from
the US dollar.
The "Nixon Shock"

Worse, since the United States had collateralized their loans with the nation's gold reserves, it quickly became apparent that
the US Government did not in fact have enough gold to cover the outstanding debts.

Foreign nations began to get very nervous about their loans to the US and understandably were reluctant to loan any
additional money to the United States without some form of collateral.

So Richard Nixon started the environmental movement, with the EPA and its various programs such as "wilderness zones",
Roadless areas", Heritage rivers", "Wetlands", all of which took vast areas of public lands and made them off limits to the
American people who were technically the owners of those lands.

But Nixon had little concern for the environment and the real purpose of this land grab under the guise of the environment was
to pledge those pristine lands and their vast mineral resources as collateral on the national debt. This was part of the
forerunner to the UN Agernda 21 "Sustainability" farce.

The plethora of different programs was simply to conceal the true scale of how much American land was being pledged to
foreign lenders as collateral on the government's debts; eventually almost 25% of the nation itself.

All of this is illegal as the Enclave Clause of the Constitution limits the Federal Government to owning the land under Federal
Government buildings and military bases, and that Enclave Clause was written into the Constitution by the Founding Fathers
to specifically to prevent the Federal Government simply seizing the land belonging to the people to sell off, pledge as
collateral, or rent!
With open lands for collateral already in short supply, the US Government embarked on a new program to shore up sagging
international demand for the dollar.

The United States approached the world's oil producing nations, mostly in the Middle East, and offered them a deal. In
exchange for only selling their oil for dollars, the United States would guarantee the military safety of those oil-rich nations.

The oil rich nations would agree to spend and invest their US paper dollars inside the United States, in particular in US
Treasury Bonds, redeemable through future generations of US taxpayers.

The concept was labeled the "petrodollar". In effect, the US, no longer able to back the dollar with gold, was now
backing it with oil.

Other peoples' oil. And that necessity to keep control over those oil nations to prop up the dollar has shaped America's foreign
policy in the region ever since.

But as America's manufacturing and agriculture has declined, the oil producing nations faced a dilemma. Those piles of US
Federal Reserve notes were not able to purchase much from the United States because the United States had little (other
than real estate) anyone wanted to buy.

Europe's cars and aircraft were superior and less costly, while experiments with GMO food crops led to nations refusing to buy
US food exports.

Israel's constant belligerence against its neighbors caused them to wonder if the US could actually keep their end of the
petrodollar arrangement. Oil producing nations started to talk of selling their oil for whatever currency the purchasers chose to
use.
Saddam Hussein

Iraq, already hostile to the United States following Desert Storm, demanded the right to sell their oil for Euros in 2000 and in
2002, the United Nations agreed to allow it under the "Oil for food" program instituted following Desert Storm.

One year later the United States re-invaded Iraq under the lie of Saddam's nuclear weapons, lynched Saddam Hussein,
and placed Iraq's oil back on the world market only for US dollars.

The clear US policy shift following 9-11, away from being an impartial broker of peace in the Mideast to one of unquestioned
support for Israel's aggressions only further eroded confidence in the Petrodollar deal and even more oil producing nations
started openly talking of oil trade for other global currencies.

Gaddafi

Over in Libya, Muammar Gaddafi had instituted a state-owned central bank and a value based trade currency, the Gold Dinar.
Also see: Libya: From Africas Richest State Under Gaddafi, to Failed State After NATO Intervention

Gaddafi announced that Libya's oil was for sale, but only for the Gold Dinar. Other African nations, seeing the rise of the Gold
Dinar and the Euro, even as the US dollar continued its inflation-driven decline, flocked to the new Libyan currency for trade.

This move had the potential to seriously undermine the global hegemony of the dollar. French President Nicolas
Sarkozy reportedly went so far as to call Libya a threat to the financial security of the world.

So, the United States invaded Libya, brutally murdered Qaddafi (the object lesson of Saddam's lynching not being enough of
a message, apparently), imposed a private central bank, and returned Libya's oil output to dollars only. The gold that was to
have been made into the Gold Dinars is, as of last report, unaccounted for.
General Wesley Clark blew the whistle on US plans to conquer the oil-rich Middle East, to attack and take over 7 countries in 5 years.

According to General Wesley Clark, the master plan for the "dollarification" of the world's oil nations included seven targets,
Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran (Venezuela, which dared to sell their oil to China for the Yuan, is a late
addition).

What is notable about the original seven nations originally targeted by the US is that none of them are members of the Bank
for International Settlements, the private central bankers private central bank, located in Switzerland.

This meant that these nations were deciding for themselves how to run their nations' economies, rather than submit
to the international private banks.

Now the bankers' gun sights are on Iran, which dares to have a government central bank and sell their oil for whatever
currency they choose.

The war agenda is, as always, to force Iran's oil to be sold only for dollars and to force them to accept a privately
owned central bank.

Malaysia, one of the few remaining nations without a Rothschild central bank, is now being invaded by a force
claimed to be "Al Qaeda" and has suffered numerous suspicious losses of its commercial passenger jets.

With the death of President Hugo Chavez, plans to impose a US and banker friendly regime on Venezuela are clearly being
implemented.
Germany's gold bullion. Where is it?

The German government recently asked for the return of some of their gold bullion from the Bank of France and the New York
Federal Reserve. France has said it will take 5 years to return Germany's gold. The United States has said they will need 8
years to return Germany's gold.

This suggests strongly that the Bank of France and the NY Federal Reserve have used the deposited gold for other
purposes, most likely to cover gold futures contracts used to artificially suppress the price of gold to keep investors in the
equities markets, and the Central Banks are scrambling to find new gold to cover the shortfall and prevent a gold run.

So it is inevitable that suddenly France invades Mali, ostensibly to combat Al Qaeda, with the US joining in. Mali just
happens to be one of the world's largest gold producers with gold accounting for 80% of Mali exports. War for the
bankers does not get more obvious than that!

Mexico has demanded a physical audit of their gold bullion stored at the Bank of England, and along with Venezuela's vast oil
reserves (larger than Saudi Arabia), Venezuela's gold mines are a prize lusted after by all the Central Banks that played fast
and loose with other peoples' gold bullion.

So we can expect regime change if not outright invasion soon.

You have been raised by a public school system and media that constantly assures you that the reasons for all these wars
and assassinations are many and varied.

The US claims to bring democracy to the conquered lands (they haven't; the usual result of a US overthrow is the imposition
of a dictatorship, such as the 1953 CIA overthrow of Iran's democratically elected government of Mohammad Mosaddegh and
the imposition of the Shah, or the 1973 CIA overthrow of Chile's democratically elected government of President Salvador
Allende, and the imposition of Augusto Pinochet), or to save a people from a cruel oppressor, revenge for 9-11, or that tired
worn-out catch all excuse for invasion, weapons of mass destruction. Assassinations are always passed off as "crazed lone
nuts" to obscure the real agenda.

The real agenda is simple. It is enslavement of the people by creation of a false sense of obligation.

That obligation is false because the Private Central Banking system, by design, always creates more debt than money with
which to pay that debt.

Private Central Banking is not science, it is a religion; a set of arbitrary rules created to benefit the priesthood, meaning
the owners of the Private Central Bank.

The fraud persists, with often lethal results, because the people are tricked into believing that this is the way life is suppoed to
be and no alternative exists or should be dreamt of.

The same was true of two earlier systems of enslavement, Rule by Divine Right and Slavery, both systems built to trick people
into obedience, and both now recognized by modern civilizatyion as illegitimate.

Now we are entering a time in human history where we will recognize that rule by debt, or rule by Private Central Bankers
issuing the public currency as a loan at interest, is equally illegitimate.

It only works as long as people allow themselves to believe that this is the way life is supposed to be.

But understand this above all; Private Central Banks do not exist to serve the people, the community, or the nation. Private
Central Banks exist to serve their owners, to make them rich beyond the dreams of Midas and all for the cost of ink, paper,
and the right bribe to the right official.

Behind all these wars, all these assassinations, the hundred million horrible deaths from all the wars lies a single policy of
dictatorship. The private central bankers allow rulers to rule only on the condition that the people of a nation be enslaved to
the private central banks.

Failing that, said ruler will be killed, and their nation invaded by those other nations enslaved to private central banks.

The so-called "clash of civilizations" we read about on the corporate media is really a war between banking systems, with the
private central bankers forcing themselves onto the rest of the world, no matter how many millions must die for it.

Indeed the constant hatemongering against Muslims lies in a simple fact. Like the ancient Christians (prior to the Knights
Templars private banking system) , Muslims forbid usury, or the lending of money at interest. And that is the reason our
government and media insist they must be killed or converted. They refuse to submit to currencies issued at interest. They
refuse to be debt slaves.

So off to war your children must go, to spill their blood for the money-junkies' gold. We barely survived the last two world wars.
In the nuclear/bioweapon age, are the private central bankers willing to risk incinerating the whole planet just to feed their
greed?

Apparently so. This brings us to the current situation in the Ukraine, Russia, and China.

The European Union had been courting the government of the Ukraine to merge with the EU, and more to the point, entangle
their economy with the private-owned European Central Bank.
The government of the Ukraine was considering the move, but had made no commitments. Part of their concern lay with the
conditions in other EU nations enslaved to the ECB, notably Cyprus, Greece, Spain, and Italy. So they were properly
cautious.

Then Russia stepped in with a better deal and the Ukraine, exercising the basic choice all consumers have to choose the best
product at the best price, dropped the EU and announced they were going to go with Russia's offer.

It was at that point that agents provocateurs flooded into the Ukraine, covertly funded by intelligence agency fronts like
CANVAS and USAID, stirring up trouble, while the western media proclaimed this was a popular revolution. Snipers shot at
people and this violence was blamed on then-President Yanukovich.

However a leaked recording of a phone call between the EU's Catherine Ashton and Estonia's Foreign Minister Urmas Paet
confirmed the snipers were working for the overthrow plotters, not the Ukrainian government. Urmas Paet has confirmed the
authenticity of that phone call.

This is a classic pattern of covert overthrow we have seen many times before.

Since the end of WW2, the US has covertly tried to overthrow the governments of 56 nations, succeeding 25 times.

Examples include the 1953 overthrow of Iran's elected government of Mohammed Mossadegh and the imposition of the Shah,
the 1973 overthrow of Chile's elected government of Salvador Allende and the imposition of the Pinochet dictatorship, and of
course, the current overthrow of Ukraine's elected government of Yanukovich and the imposition of the current unelected
government, which is already gutting the Ukraine's wealth to hand to the western bankers.

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa have formed a parallel financial system called BRICS, officially launched on
January 1, 2015. As of this writing some 80 nations are ready to trade with BRICS in transactions that do not involve
the US dollar.
Despite US economic warfare against both Russia and China, the Ruble and Yuan are seen as more attractive for
international trade and banking than the US dollar, hence the US attempt to fan the Ukraine crisis into war with Russia, and
attempts to provoke North Korea as a back door to war with China.

The US Corporate Government: "These are the enemies of everything we hold dear in America: Your
children must kill them for us..."

Flag waving and propaganda aside, all modern wars are wars by and for the private bankers, fought and bled for by
third parties unaware of the true reason they are expected to gracefully be killed and croppled for.

The process is quite simple. As soon as the Private Central Bank issues its currency as a loan at interest, the public is forced
deeper and deeper into debt.

When the people are reluctant to borrow any more, that is when the Keynesian economists demand the government borrow
more to keep the pyramid scheme working.

When both the people and government refuse to borrow any more, that is when wars are started, to plunge everyone even
deeper into debt to pay for the war, then after the war to borrow more to rebuild.

When the war is over, the people have about the same as they did before the war, except the graveyards are far larger and
everyone is in debt to the private bankers for the next century. This is why Brown Brothers Harriman in New York was funding
the rise of Adolf Hitler.

As long as Private Central Banks are allowed to exist, inevitably as the night follows day there will be poverty,
hopelessness, and millions of deaths in endless World Wars, until the Earth itself is sacrificed in flames to Mammon.
The path to true peace on Earth lies in the abolishment of all private central banking everywhere, and a return to the
state-issued value-based currencies that allow nations and people to become prosperous.

"Banks do not have an obligation to promote the public good."

- Alexander Dielius, CEO, Germany, Austrian, Eastern Europe Goldman Sachs, 2010

"I am just a banker doing God's work."

- Lloyd Blankfein, CEO, Goldman Sachs, 2009

From the film "The International" which tells the story of the take-down of the corrupt Bank of Credit and Commerce International which was the 7th
largest private bank in the world.

'The question the people of the world should be asking is not whether to raise debt
ceilings, but rather why our governments, which are authorised to create and issue
interest-free money, instead borrow that money at interest from a privately-owned central
banking system, thereby plunging future generations into debt slavery to that bank?'

Three steps from Private Central Bank to World War:


Step 1: Enslave the nation to a private Central Bank issuing the public currency as a loan at interest to trap the
people in unpayable debt

Step 2: When the people cannot borrow any more, have the government borrow on their behalf (and without their
permissiono) to keep the pyramid scheme working

Step 3: When both the people and the government can no longer borrow, start a world war to conquer other
nations wealth to "balance the books"

An Revealing Look at the Interests of the United Nations bodies of NATO and the WTO:
Click the image above to open a larger version in a new browser window

FBI Document Confirms Hitler Fled To Argentina In 1945


April 11 2015 | From: Geopolitics

Hidden in plain sight at FBI.gov, a document confirming the whereabouts of Adolf Hitler at the
closing of World War 2 can be downloaded there.

Related: The History And Mission Of The Nazi-Illuminati Bush (Scher(f)f) Crime Family
Hes been roaming the entire United States until the ripe age of 92

Click here to view this on the FBI website. Click here to download a PDF copy of the FBI document.

From the above document:

January 12, 1945 I received a visit from X, a well known German Agent. He hinted at the possibility of German
defeat and gave me a period of two days to think of the most suitable spot in South America as a refuge for Hitler
and a group of German Scientists and officers, in case the latter should find it necessary to disappear from the
world scene temporarily.

January 13, 1945 I wracked my brain trying to decide what spot would provide the greatest security. I decided to
recommend Colombia, my own country.

149, FBI document above

After having made all the necessary arrangements, which required well over a month and a half, during which
period I was constantly in contact with Germany and the Hitler Group, the landing was made in Bahiahonda on
July 19, 1945, at dawn.

For six days Hitler and his followers travelled on horseback , only at night, from Bahiahonda to the La Loma
landing field. At the agreed hour of meeting three contact men and I waited at the rendezvous.

We had succeeded in acquiring three small four-passenger Stinson planes, to begin the trip from there to Narino.
Then, I was suddenly informed by a high-ranking German officer that Hitler had changed his mind and he had
decided not to hide on my property.

p 150, FBI document above

Newly declassified FBI documents prove that the government knew Hitler was alive and well, and living in the Andes
Mountains long after World War II.

On April 30 1945, Adolf Hitler committed suicide in his underground bunker. His body was later discovered and identified by
the Soviets before being rushed back to Russia. Is it really possible that the Soviets have been lying all this time, and that
history has purposely been rewritten?

No one thought so until the release of the FBI documents. It seems that it is possible that the most hated man in history
escaped war torn Germany and lived a bucolic and peaceful life in the beautiful foothills of the Andes Mountains.

The Intelligence Community Knew

Recently released FBI documents are beginning to show that not only was Hitler and Eva Brauns suicide faked, the
infamous pair might have had help from the director of the OSS himself, Allen Dulles.

In one FBI document from Los Angles, it is revealed that the agency was well aware of a mysterious submarine making its
way up the Argentinian coast dropping off high level Nazi officials. What is even more astonishing is the fact that the FBI
knew he was in fact living in the foothills of the Andes.

Who is the Mysterious Informant?

In a Los Angeles letter to the Bureau in August of 1945, an unidentified informant agreed to exchange information for political
asylum. What he told agents was stunning.

The informant not only knew Hitler was in Argentina, he was one of the confirmed four men who had met the German
submarine. Apparently, two submarines had landed on the Argentinian coast, and Hitler with Eva Braun was on board the
second.

The Argentinian government not only welcomed the former German dictator, but also aided in his hiding. The informant went
on to not only give detailed directions to the villages that Hitler and his party had passed through, but also credible physical
details concerning Hitler.

While for obvious reasons the informant is never named in the FBI papers, he was credible enough to be believed by some
agents.

The FBI Tried to Hide Hitlers Whereabouts


Even with a detailed physical description and directions the FBI still did not follow up on these new leads. Even with evidence
placing the German sub U-530 on the Argentinian coast shortly before finally surrounding, and plenty of eye witness
accounts of German official being dropped off, no one investigated.

Even More Evidence is Found:

Along with the FBI documents detailing an eye witness


account of Hitlers whereabouts in Argentina, more
evidence is coming to light to help prove that Adolf Hitler
and Eva Braun did not die in that bunker.

In 1945, the Naval Attach in Buenos Aires informed


Washington there was a high probability that Hitler and Eva
Braun had just arrived in Argentina.

This coincides with the sightings of the submarine U-530.


Added proof comes in the form of newspaper articles
detailing the construction of a Bavarian styled mansion in
the foothills of the Andes Mountains.

Further proof comes in the form of architect Alejandro


Bustillo who wrote about his design and construction of
Hitlers new home which was financed by earlier wealthy
German immigrants.

Irrefutable Evidence that Hitler Escaped:

Information has emerged which indicates that the current Chancellor of Perhaps the most damming evidence that Hitler did survive
Germany, Angela Merkel is either the daughter or grand daughter of the fall of Germany lies in Russia. With the Soviet
Adolf Hitler and that she is the leader of the Fourth Reich. It is
occupation of Germany, Hitlers supposed remains were
suggested that this photo is of the two. quickly hidden and sent off to Russia, never to be seen
again.

That is until 2009, when an archeologist from Connecticut State, Nicholas Bellatoni was allowed to perform DNA testing on
one of the skull fragments recovered.

What he discovered set off a reaction through the intelligence and scholarly communities. Not only did the DNA not match
any recorded samples thought to be Hitlers, they did not match Eva Brauns familiar DNA either. So the question is, what did
the Soviets discover in the bunker, and where is Hitler?

Even former general and President Dwight D. Eisenhower wrote to Washington

It was not only General Eisenhower who was concerned over Hitlers compete disappearance, Stalin also expressed his
concerns. In 1945, the Stars and Stripes newspaper quoted then General Eisenhower as believing that the real possibility
existed of Hitler living safely and comfortably in Argentina.

Is it Possible?

With all of the new found evidence coming to light, it is possible and even likely that not only did Hitler escape from Germany;
he had the help of the international intelligence community. Released FBI documents prove that they were not only aware of
Hitlers presence in Argentina; they were also helping to cover it up.

It would not be the first time the OSS helped a high ranking Nazi official to escape punishment and capture. Look at the story
of Adolf Eichmann who was located in Argentina in the 1960s.

Did Hitler escape to Argentina? The answer is yes.


President Putin Reveals Possession Of 9/11 Satellite Imagery Evidence Indicating US
Government Complicity In False Flag Attack
April 8 2015 | From: StateOfTheNation

Pravda: "Putin Threatens to Release Satellite Evidence of 9/11"

There is no story bigger than 9/11 as far as the U.S. Federal Government is concerned. Simply put, it is and has
been their lynchpin. When the American people come to understand that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were in
fact a false flag operation carried out by proxies of the U.S. Federal Government, everything changes.

The transparent U.S. Government complicity in the coordination and coverup of the 9/11 crimes against its own citizenry has
now been proven UNEQUIVOCALLY by mountains of scientific, circumstantial and anecdotal evidence.

Only because the Mainstream Media (MSM) has relentlessly covered up this crime against humanity, for well over 13 years
and counting, have the successive administrations been free from prosecution .

Thats all about to change in 2015

President Vladimir Putin and the Russian Government have been pushed around and bullied, persecuted and prosecuted,
for only defending their Motherland and their citizenry.

The Western powers (a.k.a. the Anglo-American Axis or AAA) led by the USA and UK, Germany and France, Australia and
Canada, as well as Israel have participated in one scheme after another in order to falsely implicate Russia for their (AAA)
own crimes of genocide in the Ukriane, Palestine and elsewhere around the globe.

How many fraudulent false flag operations is the CIA, MI6 and MOSSAD willing to carry out in order to falsely accuse
Russia?
How many false flag attacks will the AAA criminal cabal conduct against the innocent Russian - speaking civilians of the
Eastern Ukraine? Or, against the innocent people from other countries like those nearly 300 passengers on Malaysian
Flight MH17 that Kiev military jets blew out of the sky.

How many coverups can they maintain before their delusions of grandeur and illusions of faded glory catch up with them?

U.S. Foreign Policy has been run by dangerous amateurs and shameless provocateurs for decades

President Obama and VP Biden, Secretaries Kerry and Clinton, Senators McCain and Graham have each contributed
majorly to the catastrophe that the Ukraine has become.

George Soros and Zbigniew Brzezinski, Obamas illustrious unpaid foreign policy advisors have also substantially
contributed to the diplomatic disasters that led up to the Ukraine civil war. All of these same players have likewise played
significant roles in recklessly restarting the Cold War, as if the world doesnt have enough to deal with during these
tumultuous times.

Now they (CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, etc.) have pushed the Russians too far. Lets see whats in store
for the the present and previous U.S. Administrations that have unrelentingly used and abused Russia since the breakup of
the Soviet Union.

The pattern of abusive statesmanship and economic terrorism began with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. That represents
over 25 years of exploitation and victimization that Russia has suffered at the hands of the AAA.

Putins Russia possesses indisputable scientific evidence of the real 9/11 crimes

How will these same AAA politicos and power-brokers respond when Putin starts disseminating authoritative evidence which
proves beyond any doubt that the U.S. Administration was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks?

What follows is a rather crude translation of an article which recently appeared in PRAVDA, a now independent Russian
news platform which is often used by the Kremlin to disseminate messages to the West. The title of the article has been
translated as follows:

US Fears Russian Publication Of Satellite Photos Of The 9/11 Tragedy


Moscow (Pravda): American experts believe that despite the fact that relations between the US and Russia reached the
worst point since the Cold War, Putin caused Obama only small troubles so far. Analysts believe that this calm before the
storm.

Putin is going to hit once, but hes going to hit hard. Russia is preparing the release of evidence of the involvement of
the US government and intelligence services in the September 11 attacks. In the list of evidence is included the satellite
images from 9/11.

Published material can prove the US Government complicity in the 9/11 attacks and the successful manipulation of public
opinion. The attack was planned by the US government, but executed by using proxies, so that an attack on
America and the people of the United States looked like an act of aggression of international terrorism.

The motive for deception and murder its own citizens served US oil interests and the Middle Eastern state
corporations.

The evidence will be so convincing that it utterly debunks the official 9/11 cover story supported by the US government.

Russia proves that America is no stranger to using false flag terrorism against its citizens in order to achieve a pretext for
military intervention in foreign countries. In the case of the September 11 attacks, the evidence will be conclusive satellite
imagery.

If successful, the consequences of Putins tactics would expose the US governments secret terrorist policies. The
governments credibility will be undermined and should bring about mass protests in the cities leading to an uprising,
according to American analysts.

And then, how will the United States look in the world political arena? The validity of Americas position as a leader in the
fight against international terrorism will be totally undermined thereby giving immediate advantage to the rogue states and
Islamic terrorists.

The actual development of the situation could be much worse, experts warn.

Blood Money: These Companies And People Make Billions Of Dollars From War
March 29 2015 | From: GlobalResearch

War against a foreign country only happens when the moneyed classes think they are going to profit
from it. George Orwell
The late United States Marine Corps Major General Smedley D. Butler is perhaps most famous for his post-retirement
speech titled War is a Racket. In the early 1930s, Butler presented the speech on a nationwide tour. It was so
popular that he wrote a longer version as a small book that was published in 1935.

Butler points to a variety of examples, mostly from World War I, where industrialists whose operations were subsidized by
public funding were able to generate substantial profits essentially from mass human suffering.

The work is divided into five chapters:

War is a racket

Who makes the profits?

Who pays the bills?

How to smash this racket!

To hell with war!

It contains this summary:

War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is
the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in
lives. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people.

Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of
the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.
What Butler was candidly describing was later referred to as the military-industrial complexby Dwight D. Eisenhower,
who warned Americans of its existence in his farewell address in 1961:

Butler went on to say

Due to the fact that Facebook has chosen to involve software that will allow the theft of my personal information, I
do declare the following: on this day, August 29th 2014, in response to the new Facebook guidelines and under
articles L.111, 112 and 113 of the code of intellectual property, I declare that my rights are attached to all my
personal data, drawings, paintings, photos, texts etc... published on my profile. For commercial use of the
foregoing my written consent is required at all times.

Those reading this text can copy it and paste it on their Facebook wall. This will allow them to place themselves
under the protection of copyright. By this release, I tell Facebook that it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy,
distribute, broadcast, or to take any other action against me on the basis of this profile and/or its contents. The
actions mentioned above apply equally to employees, students, agents and/or other staff under the direction of
Facebook.

The contents of my profile include private information. The violation of my privacy is punished by the law (UCC 1 1-
308 - 308 1 -103 and the Rome Statute). Facebook is now an open capital entity. All members are invited to post a
notice of this kind, or if you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you have not published this statement at
least once, you will tacitly allow the use of elements such as your photos as well as the information contained in
your profile update.

In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and
billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in
their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.

How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew
what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights,
ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy?
How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?

Out of war nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it. This newly acquired territory
promptly is exploited by the few the selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public
shoulders the bill.

And what is this bill?

This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken
hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for
generations and generations.

For a great many years, as a soldier, I had a suspicion that war was a racket; not until I retired to civil life did I fully
realize it. Now that I see the international war clouds gathering, as they are today, I must face it and speak out.

Butler also exposed the Business Plot, an alleged plan to overthrow the U.S. government. In 1933, Butler told a congressional
committee that a group of wealthy industrialist businessmen (including individuals from General Motors, Prescott Bush,
grandfather of George Bush Jr., J.P. Morgan, and the Rockefeller dynasty) were planning a military coup to overthrow
President Franklin D. Roosevelt, with Butler selected to lead a march of veterans to become dictator, similar to other Fascist
regimes at that time. The individuals involved all denied the existence of a plot, and the media ridiculed the allegations, calling
them a gigantic hoax.

A final report by a special House of Representatives Committee confirmed some of Butlers testimony.

****
Despite warnings of its existence and imminent expansion, the military-industrial complex (or military-industrial-congressional
complex) remains in operation today. It is an iron trianglethat comprises the policy and monetary relationships which exist
between legislators, national armed forces, and the arms industry that supports them. These relationships include political
contributions, political approval for military spending, lobbying to support bureaucracies, and oversight of the industry.

It is a major reason we are stuck in a perpetual war.

****

In their article titled Companies Profiting the Most From War, Thomas C. Frohlich and Mark Lieberman listed the 10
companies profiting the most from war. To identify them, they examined the companies with the most arms sales based on
information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

Arms sales, including advisory, planes, vehicles, and weapons, were defined by sales to military customers as well as
contracts to government militaries. Also considered were each companys 2013 total sales and profits, the total number of
employees at the company, as well as nation-level military spending, all provided by SIPRI.

From the article:

U.S. companies still dominate the arms market by a large margin, with six among the top 10 arms sellers. In the
top 100 arms-producing companies, 39 are based in the United States, and U.S. companies accounted for more
than 58% of total arms sales among the top 100. U.S. company arms sales in the top 10 alone made up 35% of
total arms sales among the top 100. By contrast, Western European companies, which make up the rest of the top
10 arms producers, accounted for just 28% of the total top 100 arms sales.

Here are the top 10 war-profiteering companies and their political ties.

10. Thales Group (Paris)

Arm sales 2013: $10.4 billion, profit: $800 million

Profile for 2014 Election Cycle


CONTRIBUTIONS: $0
LOBBYING: $520,000 (2014), $460,000 (2013) (ranks 614 of 4,065 in 2014)

REVOLVING DOOR: 9 out of 10 Thales Group lobbyists in 2013-2014 have previously held government jobs.

For a list of bills Thales Group has lobbied, click here.

Chairman Henri Proglios salary is rumored to be $436,128 USD.

CEO Patrice Caines salary has not been published.

9. Finmeccanica S.p.A. (Italy)


Arm sales 2013: $10.6 billion, profit $100 million

Not only is this company a top war profiteer, it is a huge U.S. political campaign contributor.

From OpenSecrets.org:

Profile for 2014 Election Cycle


CONTRIBUTIONS: $446,850 (ranks 696 of 16,793)
LOBBYING: $1,754,000 (2014), $1,965,500 (2013) (ranks 303 of 4,065 in 2014)
Contributions to candidates: $342,550 (for a list of recipients, click here)
Contributions to Leadership PACs: $18,100
Contributions to parties: $86,200
Contributions to 527 committees: $0
Contributions to outside spending groups: $0

For a list of bills Finmeccanica S.p.A. has lobbied, click here.

Heres some additional information on this company:

The total of contributions to candidates from Finmeccanica SpA PACs is 24 times larger than contributions from
individuals. REVOLVING DOOR: 21 out of 34 Finmeccanica SpA lobbyists in 2013-2014 have previously held
government jobs.

CEO Mauro Morettis wage packet is said to be $1.2 million USD.

8. United Technologies (U.S.)


Arm sales 2013: $11.9 billion, profit $5.7 billion

United Technologies might be the lowest ranking of the U.S. companies in this list, but dont let that fool
you.OpenSecrets bestowed the company with the label heavy hitter, which means it is one of the 140 biggest overall donors
to federal elections since the 1990 election cycle, as compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.

Profile for 2014 Election Cycle


CONTRIBUTIONS: $2,105,245 (ranks 124 of 16,793)
LOBBYING: $15,738,000 (2014), $13,900,373 (2013) (ranks 13 of 4,065 in 2014)
Contributions to candidates: $1,769,400 (for a list of recipients, click here)
Contributions to Leadership PACs: $199,250
Contributions to parties: $124,470
Contributions to 527 committees: $10,625
Contributions to outside spending groups: $1,500

For a list of bills United Technologies has lobbied, click here.

Heres some additional information on this company:

The total of contributions to candidates from United Technologies PACs is 19 times larger than contributions from
individuals.
REVOLVING DOOR: 52 out of 70 United Technologies lobbyists in 2013-2014 have previously held government
jobs.

24 Congressional members own United Technologies shares (for the list, click here).

CEO Gregory J. Hayes has a reported annual salary of $949,583 and an annual bonus of $1,600,00, for a total annual
compensation of $2,549,583.

7. Airbus Group (France/Netherlands)

Arm sales 2013: $15.7 billion, profit $2 billion

Profile for 2014 Election Cycle


CONTRIBUTIONS: $365,752 (ranks 855 of 16,793)
LOBBYING: $3,288,178 (2014), $3,749,750 (2013) (ranks 156 of 4,065 in 2014)
Contributions to candidates: $259,322 (for a list of recipients, click here)
Contributions to Leadership PACs: $83,500
Contributions to parties: $22,930
Contributions to 527 committees: $0
Contributions to outside spending groups: $0

For a list of bills this company has lobbied, click here.

Additional information about Airbus Group:

The total of contributions to candidates from Airbus Group PACs is 4 times largerthan contributions from
individuals.

REVOLVING DOOR: 42 out of 57 Airbus Group lobbyists in 2013-2014 have previously held government jobs.

6. General Dynamics (U.S.)

Arm sales 2013: $18.7 billion, profit $2.4 billion

OpenSecrets labeled this company a heavy hitter, which means it is one of the 140 biggest overall donors to federal
elections since the 1990 election cycle, as compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.

General Dynamics is one of the nations top defense contractors, assembling virtually every type of military
machinery engaged in modern combat. The company builds warships, nuclear submarines, tanks and combat jets,
not to mention the command and control systems that link all of these technologies together. The company has
lobbied hard to encourage lawmakers to step up appropriations for the Navy, one of the companys biggest clients.

It has fought attempts to shrink the nations fleet of submarines and warships, thereby helping block Defense
Department attempts to shift that money to other facets of the nations land and air defenses.

Details:

Profile for 2014 Election Cycle


CONTRIBUTIONS: $1,974,599 (ranks 140 of 16,793)
LOBBYING: $10,720,923 (2014), $11,066,974 (2013) (ranks 27 of 4,065 in 2014)
Contributions to candidates: $1,405,525 (for a list of recipients, click here)
Contributions to Leadership PACs: $401,300
Contributions to parties: $162,974
Contributions to 527 committees: $4,350
Contributions to outside spending groups: $5,450

For a list of bills this company has lobbied, click here.

More information about General Dynamics:

The total of contributions to candidates from General Dynamics PACs is 6 times larger than contributions from
individuals.

6 Congressional members own shares in this company (click here for the list).

REVOLVING DOOR: 96 out of 133 General Dynamics lobbyists in 2013-2014 have previously held government
jobs.

CEO Phebe Novakovic earned nearly $19 million in total compensation in fiscal 2014.

5. Northrop Grumman (U.S.)

Arm sales 2013: $20.2 billion, profit $2 billion

Weve got another heavy hitter here:

Northrop Grumman is the fourth largest defense contractor and the worlds largest builder of naval vessels as of
2010. As a member of the miscellaneous defense industry, Northrop Grumman specializes in aerospace systems,
electronic systems, information systems, ship building and technical services.

Northrop Grumman focuses much of its efforts securing government defense contracts and earmarks. During the
2008 election cycle, people and political action committees associated with Northrop Grumman contributed more
than $2 million to federal candidates and committees, favoring Democrats slightly.

Details:

Profile for 2014 Election Cycle


CONTRIBUTIONS $4,050,624 (ranks 45 of 16,793)
LOBBYING $10,216,960 (2014), $20,590,000 (2013) (ranks 28 of 4,065 in 2014)
Contributions to candidates: $2,613,112 (for a list of recipients, click here)
Contributions to Leadership PACs: $1,194,560
Contributions to parties: $231,602
Contributions to 527 committees: $6,000
Contributions to outside spending groups: $5,350

For a list of bills this company has lobbied, click here.

More information about Northrop Grumman:

The total of contributions to candidates from Northrop Grumman PACs is 9 times larger than contributions from
individuals.

REVOLVING DOOR: 32 out of 49 Northrop Grumman lobbyists in 2013-2014 have previously held government
jobs.

6 Congressional members own shares in this company (for the list, click here).

CEO Wesley G. Bushs total pay package, including the change in the value of his pension, was $18.6 million in 2013,
reports The Washington Post. His salary and stock awards remained steady at about $1.5 million and $8 million, respectively.

4. Raytheon (U.S.)

Arm sales 2013: $29.9 billion, profit $2 billion

OpenSecrets has identified Raytheon as a heavy hitter:

Raytheon is a major American defense contractor that specializes in defense and homeland security technology.
As the worlds largest producer of guided missiles, Raytheon specializes in manufacturing defense systems and
defense electronics.
A member of the defense electronic industry, Raytheon is most active lobbying on defense, homeland security and
federal budget appropriation issues. Until 2008, individuals and political action committees associated with
Raytheon had favored Republicans in campaign contribution giving, but after Democrats won both chambers of
Congress and the White House, the defense firm favors Democrats, giving 55 percent of campaign contributions to
Democrats and 45 percent to Republicans in 2008

Considering that access is needed when securing large government defense contract, its of little surprise that
Raytheon spends millions of dollars each year lobbying the federal government. Raytheon is the primary
manufacturer of Tomahawk cruise missiles, dozens of which have been used by U.S. and British military forces in
strikes against targets in Libya during 2011.
Details:

Raytheon is a major American defense contractor that specializes in defense and homeland security technology.
As the worlds largest producer of guided missiles, Raytheon specializes in manufacturing defense systems and
defense electronics.
A member of the defense electronic industry, Raytheon is most active lobbying on defense, homeland security and
federal budget appropriation issues. Until 2008, individuals and political action committees associated with
Raytheon had favored Republicans in campaign contribution giving, but after Democrats won both chambers of
Congress and the White House, the defense firm favors Democrats, giving 55 percent of campaign contributions to
Democrats and 45 percent to Republicans in 2008

Considering that access is needed when securing large government defense contract, its of little surprise that
Raytheon spends millions of dollars each year lobbying the federal government. Raytheon is the primary
manufacturer of Tomahawk cruise missiles, dozens of which have been used by U.S. and British military forces in
strikes against targets in Libya during 2011.

For a list of bills Raytheon has lobbied, click here.

More information about this company:

The total of contributions to candidates from Raytheon PACs is 11 times larger than contributions from
individuals.

REVOLVING DOOR: 51 out of 67 Raytheon lobbyists in 2013-2014 have previously held government jobs.

8 Congressional members own shares in this company (click here for a list).

CEO Thomas A. Kennedy made $5,324,743 in total compensation for fiscal 2013.

3. BAE Systems (U.S./United Kingdom)

Arm sales 2013: $26.8 billion, profit $275 million

Profile for 2014 Election Cycle


CONTRIBUTIONS: $1,360,369 (ranks 210 of 16,793)
LOBBYING: $3,920,000 (2014), $4,635,000 (2013) (ranks 124 of 4,065 in 2014)
Contributions to candidates: $931,389 (for a list of recipients, click here)
Contributions to Leadership PACs: $301,750
Contributions to parties: $120,980
Contributions to 527 committees: $5,500
Contributions to outside spending groups: $3,250
For a list of bills BAE Systems has lobbied, click here.

More details:

The total of contributions to candidates from BAE Systems PACs is 9 times largerthan contributions from
individuals.

REVOLVING DOOR: 27 out of 36 BAE Systems lobbyists in 2013-2014 have previously held government jobs.

CEO Ian Kings total annual compensation is $3,826,308.

2. Boeing (U.S.)

Arm sales 2013: $30.7 billion, profit $4.6 billion

Boeing has been labeled a heavy hitter by OpenSecrets:

Boeing is the worlds top manufacturer of commercial airplanes, including well-known aircraft such as the 787 and
the 747. The company is also a leading military supplier, making fighter-bombers, transport planes and the Apache
helicopter.

Along with rival Lockheed Martin, the company regularly lobbies Congress to win military contracts and increase
defense spending. Boeing is a major supporter of free trade, especially in Asia, where it has focused on selling
more planes. The company also lobbies on environmental rules and transportation regulations, among other
issues.

Boeing is also a large recipient of government loan-guarantees, primarily coming from the Export-Import Bank of
the United States.

Profile for 2014 Election Cycle

CONTRIBUTIONS: $3,227,934 (ranks 67 of 16,793)


LOBBYING: $16,800,000 (2014), $15,230,000 (2013) (ranks 10 of 4,065 in 2014)
Contributions to candidates: $2,536,149 (for a list of recipients, click here)
Contributions to Leadership PACs: $398,276
Contributions to parties: $252,685
Contributions to 527 committees: $33,749
Contributions to outside spending groups: $79,325
For a list of bills Boeing has lobbied, click here.

More information on this company:

The total of contributions to candidates from Boeing PACs is 6 times larger than contributions from individuals.

REVOLVING DOOR: 83 out of 115 Boeing Co lobbyists in 2013-2014 have previously held government jobs.

17 Congressional members own Boeing shares (click here for the list).

CEO W. James McNerney Jr. made $23,263,562 in total compensation in 2013. Of this total $1,930,000 was received as a
salary, $12,920,972 was received as a bonus, $3,763,503 was received in stock options, $3,763,534 was awarded as stock,
and $885,553 came from other types of compensation. He earned $23.5 million total in 2014.

1. Lockheed Martin (U.S.)

Arm sales 2013: $35.5 billion, profit $3 billion

As the top war profiteer on this list, it should be no surprise that Lockheed Martin is ranked as a heavy hitter by OpenSecrets:

Lockheed Martin is the nations top defense contractor, the brains behind such high-tech military hardware as the
F-16 jet fighter and a variety of land and sea missiles. In 2001, the company landed the biggest defense contract in
history when it was named the main contractor for the Joint Strike Fighter.

Considering that access is the name of the game when securing such lucrative contracts, its no surprise that
Lockheed splits its campaign money equally between Democrats and Republicans. All told, NASA and the
Defense Department account for roughly 80 percent of the companys annual sales.

Profile for 2014 Election Cycle

CONTRIBUTIONS: $4,132,497 (ranks 44 of 16,793)


LOBBYING: $14,581,800 (2014), $14,516,226 (2013) (ranks 16 of 4,065 in 2014)
Contributions to candidates: $3,001,928 (for a list of recipients, click here)
Contributions to Leadership PACs: $897,425
Contributions to parties: $219,086
Contributions to 527 committees: $5,585
Contributions to outside spending groups: $10,373

For a list of bills Lockheed Martin has lobbied, click here.

Additional information about this company:


The total of contributions to candidates from Lockheed Martin PACs is 7 times largerthan contributions from
individuals.

REVOLVING DOOR: 69 out of 109 Lockheed Martin lobbyists in 2013-2014 have previously held government
jobs.

CEO Marillyn Hewson earned $25.16 million in 2014. Of this total, $1.34 million was base salary, $8.16 million was stock
awards, $5.98 million was from incentive plan compensation, $9.41 million was in pension earnings, and other compensation
was $238,150.

****

As you can see, many companies and individuals including politicians stand to profit greatly from perpetual war.

And we, the taxpayers, are footing the bill.

Every hour, taxpayers in the United States are paying $312,500 for cost of military action against ISIS.

Every hour, taxpayers in the United States are paying $10.17 million for cost of war in Afghanistan.

Every hour, taxpayers in the United States are paying $365,297 for cost of war in Iraq.

Every hour, taxpayers in the United States are paying $10.54 million for total cost of wars since 2001.

Every hour, taxpayers in the United States are paying $8.43 million for Homeland Security Since 9/11.

Every hour, taxpayers in the United States are paying $58 million for the Department of Defense.

For a live ticker showing how much we have paid to date in each of the categories above, please visit the National Priorities
Project site. You also can use the sites trade-off tool to see what else those dollars could buy.

****

The full costs of war cannot simply be measured in dollars. It is impossible to place a monetary value on the tremendous loss
of life (both military and civilian) caused by perpetual war.

Since 2003, U.S. military deaths in Afghanistan total 2,356. UK military deaths total 453, and there have been 677 coalition
military deaths from other countries.

Since 2003, U.S. military deaths in Iraq total 4,489. UK military deaths total 179, and there have been 140 coalition military
deaths from other countries.

There have been 136,495 154,378 documented civilian deaths that resulted from military intervention in Iraq since 2003.

In Iraq, 1,487 contractor employees have died. 348 journalists have been killed. 448 academics have died.

To view information on 6,840 U.S. service members who have perished in Afghanistan and Iraq, please see Faces of the
Fallen.

Deaths dont only occur in combat. An unusually high percentage of young veterans have died since returning home, many as
a result of drug overdose, suicide, and vehicle crashes, reports Costs of War. The suicide rate doubled in the Army during the
first decade of the wars among both the deployed and the non-deployed.

In many ways, the people of Afghanistan and Iraq are worse off now than they were before U.S. military invasion. Both
countries are considered more authoritarian, more corrupt, and more repressive than they were before.
****

In his piece titled A State of Perpetual War, David A. Love makes a fitting comparison:

In the George Orwell classic 1984, there is a state of perpetual war between the nations of Oceania, Eurasia and
Eastasia. The enemy in the conflict is ambiguous, and the battlefield exists in an elusive and distant land. The
enemy could be Eurasia one day, and Eastasia the next, but that location is really insignificant.

The mission of perpetual war for these superpowers is to justify psychological and physical control over their
populations, to keep their people busy, fearful and hateful towards the enemy. The perpetual war also serves as an
excuse for a nations failings and shortcomings. The economy, the labor force and industry are all centered around
war rather than consumer goods. People live a miserable existence with poverty and no hope of improving their
standard of living.

Love points out that there are bigger problems we should be concerned about:

there are many domestic threats that seem to pose a greater risk to national security, including the U.S.
economic system itself.

He concludes with:

If we are to have a perpetual war, it must be a war against injustice and deprivation at home and abroad. We need
to get our own house in order, rather than demolish and rebuild other nations that did not invite us there. And as far
as the so-called terrorism problem is concerned, maybe we should stay out of other folks backyards and it will go
away.

Indeed, the authorities would like us to believe that fighting for our freedoms in lands thousands of miles away is a necessary
evil.

In War is a Racket, Butler suggested the following three steps to smash the war racket:

1. We must take the profit out of war.


2. We must permit the youth of the land who would bear arms to decide whether or not there should be war.
3. We must limit our military forces to home defense purposes.

Butler concluded his speech with the following exclamation:

TO HELL WITH WAR!

That seems like an appropriate conclusion here as well.

Global Terror: The British Connection


March 15 2015 | From: HumansAreFree

"There are powers at work in this country about which we have no knowledge. Britains Queen
Elizabeth II speaking to Paul Burrell, former butler to the late Princess Diana
On July 7, 2005 bombings on the London subway system and a bus killed 52 people and injured 700. As the list of
unanswered questions and inconsistencies about the attacks continued to grow, blame was quickly laid on al
Qaeda.

The effects of the London bombings were immediate: There was a renewed commitment by Western leaders to the war on
terror. Most other stories and scandals were wiped off newspaper front pages, including UK Prime Minister Tony Blairs
plummeting popularity.

The bombings occurred while the G8 Summit was going on in nearby Gleneagles, Scotland. It was here the topic of
terrorism was beginning to seem tired amid broadening demands for debt cancellation for impoverished countries.

US President George Bushs priority the war on terror was moving out of the limelight.

Afterwards, with London smoking and bleeding, Bush and Blair were able to stand up tall and look strong as they declared
the war on terror would be won: we will prevail and they will not, and, we alone are fighting to defend the values of
Western civilisation.

Terror returned to front and centre and further debt cancellation was forgotten.The bombings were the green light for Tony
Blair to introduce draconian anti-terrorism legislation which had previously been thwarted by judicial rulings designed to
protect human rights.

Blair said he plans policies for deportation of people who foster hatred. Parliament will also be asked to pass a law against
condoning or glorifying terrorism anywhere in the world, and giving the government the power to close places of worship.
Lists are to be drawn up of extremist websites, bookshops and centres.
A clampdown on words or actions likely to be seen as glorifying terrorism could affect groups and individuals unconnected
to Islamic extremism animal rights activists, for example, may have to change much of what they write if they are not to
fall foul of the legislation.

British MP George Galloway, a vocal supporter of the Iraqi resistance movement, could be charged under the new law
because the government has demonised the resistance as terrorists.

Australian Prime Minister John Howard also announced a similar review to tighten up anti-terrorism legislation.

Who was ultimately responsible for the July 7 bombings remains a mystery. But authorities seemed to know who was
behind it soon after the attack. London Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair had already made up his mind when
he said the investigation into the bombs will uncover a clear al Qaeda link.

Responding to news of the July 7 bombings, Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, who heads Irans top legislative watchdog the
Guardian Council, said the British had themselves to blame.

One possible set of culprits is al Qaeda. But al Qaeda is Bush and Blair. Who launched al Qaeda? You must be
tried, you who are the mothers of al Qaeda, he told worshippers at Friday prayers in Tehran.

The other likelihood is that the British regime may have carried out the attack itself because it benefits most
They want to justify their presence in Iraq and Afghanistan, he added.

Read the full story at: HumansAreFree

Truth In Media: The Origin Of ISIS - Ben Swann Confronts Obama And Exposes
Engineered War
February 29 2015 | From: BenSwann

In the latest episode of Truth in Media, Ben Swann investigates the origins of the militant group
referred to as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Comment: Ben Swann is amazing in that his roots were in the mainstream media and he still works part-time for RT,
but he also has his own channel online - where he reports the facts that the mainstream is not willing or able to. In
this report (with video) he blows the Islamic State sideshow right out of the water - and effectively calls the cabal
manipulators out on their game.

While it has been well established via multiple vectors and souces that the cabal employed two of their proxies, i.e.
the CIA and MOSSAD, to bring ISIS / ISIL to the fore in this faux-war - Swann approaches this from a pragmatic
position; such that those who are newly awakened to the ruse will be able to process the information with a minimum
of shock.
The name ISIS is one that every American knows, Swann said The biggest threat to our national security since Al-
Qaeda, right? They are a brutal, savage group known for public beheadings and mass executions. They are the face
of the new war on terror.

Swann pointed out that while the U.S. Military is currently conducting airstrikes in Syria, in a supposed attempt to take out ISIS
targets, the White House and U.S. military leaders are discussing possible boots on the ground in Iraq. These talks are arising
just three years after President Obama declared that the war in Iraq was over.

Former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told USA Today that in order to defeat ISIS, he believes the United States is looking
at a 30-year-war.
As the U.S. goes to war in an attempt to defeat yet another terrorist group, the biggest question is: Who exactly is ISIS and
where did they come from?

Angela Keaton, the founder of Antiwar.com, said that ISIS is entirely a creation of the United States behavior in Iraq.

Thats how we got to where we are, because of war, because of occupation, because of torture, Keaton said.
The United States government completely destabilized and wrecked Iraq. They caused it to fail miserably and that
is entirely the fault of the United States government. There is no one else to blame.

Swann explained that when the U.S. first invaded Iraq, it blew the country apart. By destroying the existing government,
toppling Saddam Hussein, and destroying the infrastructure, the U.S. left behind a power vacuum that would never have
existed under Hussein.

Daniel McAdams, the executive director of the Ron Paul Institute, said that the impact caused by the actions of the United
States is a historical fact that media just wont discuss.

This has to do with U.S. action in the region, which destroyed the infrastructure, which destroyed Iraq society,
which destroyed the Iraqi government,McAdams said.

He explained that while there were a lot of people who werent as happy as larks while living under
Saddam Hussein, they also werent at odds with Hussein in the same way they were with the government
established by the U.S.

The militant group ISIS was formed as a small insurgent group in Iraq in 2006. Swann noted that while they tried to create
problems for the U.S. military, they had no money and no real ability to recruit.

It wasnt until 2009 that ISIS shifted its focus from Iraq, where it was largely unsuccessful in developing a foothold,
and focused on the civil war in Syria, Swann said.

While in Syria, ISIS still struggled to gain a foothold. Swann attributed this to the fact that two larger groups fighting against
President Bashar al-Assad were overpowering them: al-Nusra Front or al-Qaeda and the Free Syrian Army.

Then, came a pivotal moment that most Americans arent even aware of,Swann said.

In June 2013, a Northern General for the Free Syrian Army spoke out on Al Jazeera Qatar and stated that if
international forces did not send weapons, the rebels attempting to overthrow Syrian president Bashar al-Assad
would lose their war within a month.

Swann noted that just months before this occurred he had personally confronted President Obama on the issue of why the
U.S. was covertly funding Syrian rebels.
Ben Swann confronts Barack Obama

Although Obama acted as if he was proceeding with caution, politicians such as Senator John McCain demanded action.

Within a matter of weeks of the Syrian general making his plea for international help, the U.S., the Saudis, Jordan,
Qatar, Turkey and Israel began providing weapons, training and money to so-called rebel groups like the Free
Syrian Army, Swann said.

In September 2013, American media outlets began reporting that weapons were being given to Syrian rebels. CNN reported
that while the weapons are not American-made, they were funded and organized by the CIA.

However, Swann said that things began to fall apart when less than one year after the U.S. supplied Syrian freedom fighters
with weapons, those weapons ended up in the hands of ISIS fighters.

Those ISIS fighters came from the group McCain insisted would help the U.S. overthrow Assad: the Free Syrian
Army. Swann explained that the army was not only sending the Islamic State weapons, it was also sending them
fighters.

The Free Syrian Army has lost most of the land that it ever claimed and its entirely incompetent, Keaton said.

The only thing that it has been good at is currying favor with western leaders.

Swann said that it wasnt until June 2014 that ISIS went from being a no-name group in Syria to a group that was heavily
armed and trained by U.S. and Coalition Special Forces.

This revitalized group made a dramatic entrance by crossing back over the Syrian border into Iraq and capturing Mosul and
much of the northern part of the country.
One of the most important facts that mainstream media ignores time and time again is that ISIS was able
to grow so fast, because of all the U.S. military equipment they were able to seize equipment that our
military left in Iraq, said Swann.

Truckloads of Humvees, tanks and weaponry that instead of taking or destroying, the U.S. government
simply decided to leave behind.

However, even when the U.S. government became aware that ISIS fighters were capturing U.S. equipment, it did nothing.

Swann attributed the lack of action to the fact that ISIS fighters were taking the equipment back into Syria to continue fighting
Assad, which was what the U.S. government wanted.

How is it that the United States, with all of its intelligence capabilities, didnt know this threat was
coming?McAdams said.

How many billions did we spend, maybe a hundred billion on total intelligence community budge over the year?
How did they have no idea?

Swann said that the answer is simple:

The U.S. did know who ISIS was, but the so-called Islamic State was doing what the Obama administration wanted.

The ISIS fighters continued to do what the Obama administration wanted, and in late summer 2014, they were labeled
what Swann called, the new boogeyman in the war on terror.

Over the past few months, the U.S. government, who acted like they had never even heard of ISIS, suddenly, with
the help of media has turned the Islamic State into the new focus of the war on terror, Swann said.

Now, as ISIS has continued its rise, recruitment is exploding and the group is becoming stunningly wealthy.

Swann noted that in response to the ISIS threat, the U.S. began conducting airstrikes on Syrian oil fields, instead
of going after those buying the oil.

McAdams pointed out that ISIS makes $2 million a day off of selling oil, and the United States response, of
undercutting the competition by blowing up oil fields makes no sense.

He questioned why the U.S., which is known for sanctioning anything that moves, when its angry, is not placing
sanctions on the banks or the oil companies that are involved.

Swann added that in addition to those questions, Americans should also be asking, Why is the U.S. sending $500
million to the Free Syrian Army to fight ISIS when the FSA is one of the biggest suppliers of fighters and weapons
to ISIS? and Why are we sending new and more powerful weapons to the FSA like anti-aircraft missiles
weapons that we know will be in the hands of ISIS?

Swann maintained that while the mainstream media will say that ISIS is the creation of American inaction, the
reality is that they are the product of direct action.
This direct action started with the action of creating a power vacuum in Iraq and manifested into the arming violent Jihadists,
hoping they would overthrow a leader in a neighboring Middle Eastern country.

McAdams described the U.S. government as a victim of its own insane policies, due to the fact that it is very good at
blowing things up, but really bad at putting them back together.

In determining whether or not McAdams statement was true, Swann listed three facts:

Fact #1: Our government armed Osama bin Laden and the Mujahideen in Afghanistan and created al-Qaeda.

Fact #2: Our government put Saddam Hussein into power we helped supply and create chemical
weapons for him to use against Iran in 1980 and then we overthrew him in 2003.

Fact #3: Our government trained rebel fighters in Syria who would become the group today known as
ISIS. We have watched them commit every violent atrocity you can imagine to people living in Iraq and
Syria, and now we want American taxpayers to fund a 30-year war with them.

Swann came to the conclusion that it isnt the U.S. government being held hostage by crazy policies; rather it is the American
people.

It is time that we reject the destruction of people groups around the world for the sake of foreign policy that makes
so-called defense contractors rich, and perpetuates violence, death, and the destruction of entire people
groups, Swann said.

This is the central issue of our time because humanity is greater than politics.

Obama And The Western Allied States' Fake War Against The Islamic State (ISIS):
The Islamic State Was Created And Is Protected By The U.S. And Its Allies
February 26 2015 | From: Global Research / SputnikNews / FarsNews / AotearoaAWiderPerspective

Also in this article:

ISIL Is Secret American Army In Middle East US Historian


Get Some Guts Says John Key As He Prepares To Send Other Peoples Kids To War!

Also See: The Corporate US Government Are The Terrorists - The Islamic State Is A Big Lie
Since August 2014, the US Air Force with the support of a coalition of 19 countries has relentlessly waged
an intensified air campaign against Syria and Iraq allegedly targeting the Islamic State brigades.

The Islamic State Was Created And Is Protected By The U.S. And Its Allies
Comment: It was disgusting to see John Key throw a faux-tantrum in parliament the other day in pathetic display of
bad acting, in an attempt to convince the country of the importance of our involvement in this fake war; but then he
has to in order to keep his handlers happy.

According to Defense News, over 16,000 airstrikes were carried out from August 2014 to mid January 2015. Sixty percent of
the air strikes were conducted by the US Air Force using advanced jet fighter and bombing capabilities (Aaron Mehta, A-10
Performing 11 Percent of Anti-ISIS Sorties. Defense News, January 19, 2015.)

The airstrikes have been casually described by the media as part of a soft counter-terrorism operation, rather than an act of
all out war directed against Syria and Iraq.

This large scale air campaign which has resulted in countless civilian casualties has been routinely misreported by the
mainstream media. According to Max Boot, senior fellow in national security at the Council on Foreign Relations. Obamas
strategy in Syria and Iraq is not working [ because] the U.S. bombing campaign against ISIS has been remarkably
restrained. (Newsweek, February 17, 2015, emphasis added).

Americans are led to believe that the Islamic State constitutes a formidable force confronting the US military and threatening
Western Civilization. The thrust of media reporting is that the US Air Force has failed and that Obama should get his act
together in effectively confronting this Outside Enemy of America.

According to CFR Max Boot, military escalation is the answer: what is required is for the president to dispatch more aircraft,
military advisers, and special operations forces, while loosening the restrictions under which they operate. (Ibid)

What kind of aircraft are involved in the air campaign? The F-16 Fighting Falcon,(above right), The F-15E Strike Eagle (image
below) , The A-10 Warthog, not to mention Lockheed Martins F-22 Raptor stealth tactical fighter aircraft.

Question for Our Readers

Why has the US Air Force not been able to wipe out the Islamic State which at the outset was largely equipped with
conventional small arms not to mention state of the art Toyota pickup trucks?
From the very outset, this air campaign has NOT been directed against ISIS. The evidence confirms that the Islamic State is
not the target. Quite the opposite. The air raids are intended to destroy the economic infrastructure of Iraq and Syria.

We call on our readers to carefully reflect on the following image, which describes the Islamic State convoy of pickup trucks
entering Iraq and crossing a 200 km span of open desert which separates the two countries.

What would have been required from a military standpoint to wipe out an ISIS convoy with no effective anti-aircraft
capabilities?

Without an understanding of military issues, common sense prevails. If they had wanted to eliminate the Islamic State
brigades, they could have carpet bombed their convoys of Toyota pickup trucks when they crossed the desert from
Syria into Iraq in June.

The answer is pretty obvious, yet not a single mainstream media has acknowledged it.

The Syro-Arabian Desert is open territory (see map right). With state of the art jet fighter aircraft (F15, F22 Raptor, F16) it
would have been from a military standpoint a piece of cake, a rapid and expedient surgical operation, which
would have decimated the Islamic State convoys in a matter of hours.

Instead what we have witnessed is an ongoing drawn out six months of relentless air raids and bombings, and the terrorist
enemy is apparently still intact. (In comparison, the NATO bombing raids of Yugoslavia in 1999 lasted about three months
(March 24-June 10, 1999).

And we are led to believe that the Islamic State cannot be defeated by a powerful US led military coalition of 19
countries.

The air campaign was not intended to decimate the Islamic State.

The counter-terrorism mandate is a fiction. America is the Number One State Sponsor of Terrorism.

The Islamic State is not only protected by the US and its allies, it is trained and financed by US-NATO, with the support of
Israel and Washingtons Persian Gulf allies.

ISIL Is Secret American Army In Middle East US Historian

Also see: Iraqi Army Downs 2 UK Planes Carrying Weapons for ISIL
(weapons made in the US, European countries and Israel from the areas liberated from ISIL's control)
US historian Webster Tarpley says that the United States created the Islamic State and uses
jihadists as its secret army to destabilize the Middle East.

The Islamic State is a secret army of the United States and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, a leader of the terrorist group, is a
close friend of US Senator John McCain, says US historian Webster Tarpley, according to Iranian News Agency
IRNA.

The author, known for his book 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, said that all terrorism around the world is created and
facilitated by the US government.

These are not Tarpleys first comments in which he blames the United States for creating the Islamic State. Earlier, Press TV
had an interview with Tarpley during which he explained his rationale why he thinks the United States was behind the creation
of the terrorist group.

Shiite tribal fighters raise their weapons and chant slogans against the al-Qaida-inspired Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
(ISIL) in the northwest Baghdad's Shula neighborhood, Iraq, Monday, June 16, 2014. Sunni militants captured a key northern
Iraqi town along the highway to Syria early on Monday, compounding the woes of Iraq's Shiite-led government a week after it
lost a vast swath of territory to the insurgents in the country's north.

Tarpley began by saying that the money that supports the Islamic State and its operations comes from Saudi Arabia, a key US
ally in the Middle East. The main money donor of the Islamic State is allegedly Prince Abdul Rahman al-Faisal, the brother of
Saud bin Faisal Al Saud, Saudi Arabias Foreign Minister, and Prince Turki bin Faisal Al Saud, the former Saudi Ambassador
to the United States.

Having said that, Tarpley concludes that if the United States really wanted to get rid of the Islamic State, it would have easily
issued an ultimatum to Saudi Arabia and told the Gulf Kingdom to stop sending arms and money to the terrorists in Iraq and
Syria.

'Get Some Guts' Says John Key As He Prepares To Send Other Peoples Kids To War!
It seems that in the last two years from around the time John Key signed a brand spanking new partnership with
NATO the recruitment of new soldiers went into overdrive. Especially in predominantly Maori areas with sometimes
people being blackmailed into signing on with the threat of their welfare check being cut if they didnt.

I have heard of non stop recruitment videos playing in WINZ offices and I am sure that many of young Maori have chosen an
army career as this was considered an honourable path to take. That idea seems to be changing.

Now John Key tells Andrew Little to get some guts and get on the right side in a speech. The sentence reminds me of the if
youre not with us, youre with the terrorists speech of George Bush when he announced the attack on Afghanistan after 9/11.
After 15 years of ever spreading war with millions of victims John Keyhas the Gutspa to tell the lleader of the opposition to get
some guts. Well he wont have to wait long. The body bags full of guts and gore will begin to arrive as soon as those poor
soldiers land in Iraq to partake in the invasion of Mosul. Another thing we can be sure off is that he will not tell his son or
daughter to get some guts and lead by example. The rich and powerful never do.

Propaganda & Fear-Mongering Works


January 22 2015 | From: ZeroHedge

When I see the results of polls like the one below, I realize there is no chance the majority will do
anything to reverse the course of our nation in terminal decline.

Will it take a complete collapse and bloody reset before we have a chance at putting the world back on a rational
course?

How can anyone actually think terrorism should be Obama and Congress top priority? Are Americans really that stupid? WTF
do they want Obama and Congress to do? Double the DHS budget? Increase electronic surveillance on our communications?
Give local police more military hardware? Ban guns? Repeal the 4th Amendment?

Do the ignorant masses know their actual chances of being killed by a terrorist? To say the chances are astronomically
miniscule is an understatement. See for yourself:

You are 35,079 times more likely to die from heart disease than from a terrorist attack

You are 33,842 times more likely to die from cancer than from a terrorist attack

You are 23,528 times more likely to die from obesity than from a terrorist attack

You are 5,882 times more likely to die from medical error than terrorism.

You are 4,706 times more likely to drink yourself to death than die from terrorism.

You are 1,904 times more likely to die from a car accident than from a terrorist attack.

You are 2,059 times more likely to kill yourself than die at the hand of a terrorist.

You are 452 times more likely to die from risky sexual behavior than terrorism.
You are 353 times more likely to fall to your death doing something idiotic than die in a terrorist attack.

You are 271 times more likely to die from a workplace accident than terrorism.

You are more than 9 times more likely to be killed by a law enforcement officer than by a terrorist.

You are 110 times more likely to die from contaminated food than terrorism.

See here for more statistics.

What policies do Americans want Obama and Congress to prioritize in 2015? According to the Pew Research Centers policy
priorities survey, 76 percent of people in the United States believe tackling terrorism should be the nations top priority this
year.

It is the first time in four years terrorism has made the top of Pews list and its appearance for 2015 can be attributed to
economic improvement as well as persistant terrorist threats.

Despite considerable improvement, the economy is still an area of concern for Americans and 75 percent of them want
President Obama to give it attention. Job creation is closely linked to economic improvement so it comes as little surprise that
it rounds off the top three with 67 percent of respondents expecting it to be prioritized.

The fact Americans think terrorism is our top priority proves that Edward Bernays was an evil genius.

The combination of mass media and propaganda can convince the willfully ignorant and dumbed down populace of anything.
Facts are unnecessary when fear and feelings are far more powerful. We are truly doomed.
ISIL Completely Fabricated Enemy By USA - Former CIA Contractor
December 18 2014 | From: PressTV

Former CIA contractor, Steven D. Kelley, says that the ISIL terrorist group is a completely fabricated
enemy created and funded by the United States.

This is a completely fabricated enemy, he said in a phone interview with Press TV from Anaheim, California on
Thursday.

The funding is completely from the United States and its allies and for people to think that this enemy is something
that needs to be attacked in Syria or Iraq is a farce because obviously this is something that we create it, we
control and only now it has become inconvenient for us to attack this group as a legitimate enemy, Kelley added.

He made the remarks as US President Barack Obama is under pressure to seek congressional approval before expanding
Washingtons military air campaign against ISIL targets from Iraq into neighboring Syria.

The Pentagon has already launched at least 100 airstrikes on ISIL positions in northern Iraq since Obama authorized the use
of force against the terrorist group earlier this month.

The White House insists it does not need explicit congressional authorization for those operations because they are intended
to protect American personnel and interests inside the Arab country.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Monday that Obama will not hesitate to use his authority to keep Americans
safe, but added that the president was committed to coordinating and consulting with Congress on a decision to hit ISIL
targets in Syria.

If you want to get to the root of the problem and remove this organization, the first thing they need to do is to
remove the funding and take care of entities responsible for the creation of this group, Kelley said.

I believe that this ISIS group would probably go away, would be easily defeated by the armies of [Syrian
President] Bashar Assad, he said.

Muslim Scholars Release Open Letter To Islamic State Meticulously Blasting Its
Ideology
September 26 2014 | From: HuffingtonPost

More than 120 Muslim scholars from around the world joined an open letter to the fighters and
followers of the Islamic State, denouncing them as un-Islamic by using the most Islamic of terms.

Relying heavily on the Quran, the 18-page letter released Wednesday (Sept. 24) picks apart the extremist ideology of
the militants who have left a wake of brutal death and destruction in their bid to establish a transnational Islamic
state in Iraq and Syria.

Even translated into English, the letter will still sound alien to most Americans, said Nihad Awad, executive director of the
Council of American-Islamic Relations, who released it in Washington with 10 other American Muslim religious and civil rights
leaders.

"The letter is written in Arabic. It is using heavy classical religious texts and classical religious scholars that ISIS
has used to mobilize young people to join its forces, said Awad, using one of the acronyms for the group. This
letter is not meant for a liberal audience.
Even mainstream Muslims, he said, may find it difficult to understand.

Awad said its aim is to offer a comprehensive Islamic refutation, point-by-point, to the philosophy of the Islamic State and the
violence it has perpetrated. The letters authors include well-known religious and scholarly figures in the Muslim world,
including Sheikh Shawqi Allam, the grand mufti of Egypt, and Sheikh Muhammad Ahmad Hussein, the mufti of Jerusalem and
All Palestine.

A translated 24-point summary of the letter includes the following: It is forbidden in Islam to torture; It is forbidden in Islam to
attribute evil acts to God; and It is forbidden in Islam to declare people non-Muslims until he (or she) openly declares
disbelief.

This is not the first time Muslim leaders have joined to condemn the Islamic State. The chairman of the Central Council of
Muslims in Germany, Aiman Mazyek, for example, last week told the nations Muslims that they should speak out against the
terrorist and murderers who fight for the Islamic State and who have dragged Islam through the mud.

But the Muslim leaders who endorsed Wednesdays letter called it an unprecedented refutation of the Islamic State ideology
from a collaboration of religious scholars. It is addressed to the groups self-anointed leader, Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, and the
fighters and followers of the self-declared Islamic State.

But the words Islamic State are in quotes, and the Muslim leaders who released the letter asked people to stop using the
term, arguing that it plays into the groups unfounded logic that it is protecting Muslim lands from non-Muslims and is
resurrecting the caliphate a state governed by a Muslim leader that once controlled vast swaths of the Middle East.

Ahmed Bedier, a Muslim and the president of United Voices of America, a nonprofit that encourages minority groups to
engage in civic life said:

"Please stop calling them the Islamic State, because they are not a state and they are not a religion,

President Obama has made a similar point, referring to the Islamic State by one of its acronyms
the group known as ISIL - in his speech to the United Nations earlier Wednesday. In that speech, Obama also disconnected
the group from Islam.

Enumerating its atrocities - the mass rape of women, the gunning down of children, the starvation of religious minorities -
Obama concluded: No God condones this terror.

Comment: Then Perhaps Mr Obama should stop funding it.

US Allies Against ISIS Are Actually ISIS Main Allies


October 30 2014 | From: RT

The way the US is carrying the anti-ISIS war is a total failure because the countries that initially
supported, financed and armed ISIS are within the US coalition right now, Talal Atrache, an expert
on Jihadist and Islamist mentality, told RT.
This US Air Forces Central Command photo released by the Defense Video & Imagery Distribution System (DVIDS) shows a formation of US Navy F-
18E Super Hornets in flight after receiving fuel from a KC-135 Stratotanker over northern Iraq (AFP Photo/ US Air Force / Staff Sgt. Shawn Nickel)

RT: A leaked report from the Department of Homeland Security has shown that since 2010, 13 men with terrorist ties have
entered Canada through the US. Why is America ignoring the terrorist threat at home?

Talal Atrache: Since 9/11 the US has dramatically toughened its anti-terrorism laws in order to prevent attacks on its soil. It
has increased its security and intelligence cooperation with many countries around the world and it has strongly lobbied the
UN Security Council in order to favor anti-terrorist laws.

Now the problem is that its difficult to draw a clear line between, for example, those who hold violent religious ideologies and
those are simply pious and not Islamist terrorists. The states should not discriminate against them just because they pray and
go to mosques. Its not easy to track terrorists because they are present worldwide, and the US policies in the Middle East
have led to an increased number of failed states that have become safe havens for different terrorist groups.

These groups have now bases everywhere, and with a progress of technology and means of communication they have found
new ways of expanding their worldwide network and to diversify their financial sources. So this is just to say that you cant
create failed states worldwide and separately fight terrorism in the US or other individual countries.

RT: Why has Canada taken no action to stop these crossings of people linked to terrorist cells? Do you think Canada was
notified about this?

TA: I dont know whether Canada was really notified. I suppose there is a strong and very close coordination between Canada
and the US in regard to security measures, and they should have been notified. Canada has taken many measures in order to
counter terrorism, it has recently toughened its citizenship and immigration laws, it has increased its financial intelligence
measures designed at tracking suspects.

But many politicians believe that more should be done and there is a projectright now on the table that gives the Canadian
security intelligence service more power to probe terrorism and to track suspects. Again, its not a domestic problem only; its
an international issue that has to be dealt with proper international policies.

RT: Is there a connection between the events at Parliament Hill and Canadas involvement in the US led anti-Islamic State
coalition?

TA: Apparently yes, there is an indirect link, because the terrorist who did the attack apparently has some links with ISIS and
Al-Qaeda groups, according to what ISIS is claiming right now and according to the profile of the terrorist. But this connection
has to be yet proved in a more effective way, and definitely Canadas involvement in this war has transformed Canada into
target for ISIS.
In another way, lets say, even before Canadas involvement in the US war against ISIS, there were already approximately
100 Canadian jihadists fighting in Syria in the ranks of ISIS. This is just to say again that this terrorism threat is international
and not just local, domestic issue in Canada or the US.

RT: Do you think that the idea of anti-IS coalition led by the US is good? Would this policy be successful?

TA: The way that the US is carrying this war is a total failure. Why? Just because the main US allies against ISIS are ISIS
main allies at the same time. The countries that supported initially and still financed, armed and supported ISIS are within the
US coalition right now. And this doesnt make sense.

Turkey, for example, has become a jihadist highway; this is the main place, platform for jihadists. Jihadists are coming all over
the world, transited in Turkey and going into Syria with indirect help of the Turkish government - Erdogan has not yet fired a
single shot against ISIS.

On the contrary, it has even helped, facilitated logistically the ISIS network in order to achieve its goals in Syria which is to
topple the Syrian government and to destroy the Kurdish self-administration that has been recently announced. At the same
time Saudi Arabia and Qatar have played a strong role since the beginning of the Syrian war in promoting, helping and
financing [jihadists].

The US is allied with these countries to fight ISIS, and the main thing would be, the main policy or attitude, is to fight these
countries policies that consist of supporting indirectly ISIS or Al-Nusra, which is the Syrian branch of Al-Qaeda, and other
extremist groups.

RT: What are the main problems with this US-led coalition fighting ISIS?

TA: The problem now is that, unfortunately, the US is unable to deviate from their dogmatic policy that consists of boycotting
the Syrian government, and the US really needs boots on the ground. The only viable option would be to coordinate with the
Syrian army, to promote and to help the Syrian army who is the only force willing to pay the heavy price of fighting tens of
thousands of ISIS and other jihadists.

They estimated that the Syrian army has lost more than 70,000 soldiers fighting mostly the jihadist groups since 2011. Its
unimaginable that any other army in the world would be willing to pay that same price. This is on one side.

On the other [side], the US has done everything to reduce the influence of Syria during the past few years, it did everything it
could to reduce the influence of Syria, Iran, BRICS group, including Russia and China, which happens to be the most qualified
potential partners for the US campaign on terror.

The main problem is that the US should change its allies if it really wants to fight terrorism, and to join forces with Russia,
China, Iran, Syria, that is the principle, the main country concerned in this war. And on the other hand, to implement all the
anti-terrorist laws against Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar who are in the US coalition.

There are many UN resolutions that have been passed in 2001, and here I can recall mainly the resolution 1373 that punishes
any country that directly or indirectly supports terrorism. In this aspect the countries that should be targeted for supporting
terrorism are Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and other countries like Kuwait at the same time.

So its a matter of changing alliances and stopping this dogmatic policy that leads nowhere except [to] failing states all over
the Middle East from Syria to Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan. American policy in the Middle East has been a total failure, it just
created safe haven for terrorists.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RT.

The Corporate US Government Are The Terrorists - The Islamic State Is A Big Lie
September 27 2014 | From: Global Research

Under the auspices of the United Nations Security Council, with president Obama chairing the
Council session, the United States has called upon the international community to adopt strong
measures, at national and international levels, to curtail the recruitment of Islamic State fighters.

What is not mentioned in the media reports is that the heads of State and heads of government who have endorsed
Americas campaign against the Islamic State, advised by their respective secret services, are fully aware that US
intelligence is the unspoken architect of the Islamic State, which is part of a vast network of US supported jihadist
terrorist entities. Countries are either coerced into supporting the US sponsored resolution or they are complicit in
the US terror agenda.

Lest we forget, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, have been financing and training the ISIL terrorists on behalf of the United States. Israel
is harboring the Islamic State (ISIL) in the Golan Heights, NATO in liaison with the Turkish high command has since March
2011 been involved in coordinating the recruitment of the jihadist fighters dispatched to Syria. Moreover, the ISIL brigades in
both Syria and Iraq are integrated by Western special forces and military advisers.

All this is known and documented, yet not a single head of state or head of government has had the courage to point to the
absurdity of the US sponsored United Nations Security Council resolution, which was adopted unanimously on September 24.

Absurdity is an understatement. What we are witnessing is a criminal undertaking under UN auspices.

While international diplomacy is often based on deception, US foreign policy lies are no longer credible. What we are
witnessing is a total breakdown of established diplomatic practice. The Forbidden Truth is that the Islamic State is an
instrument of Washington, a US intelligence asset. ISIL is not an independent entity, nor is it an outside enemy which
threatens global security, as conveyed by the Western media.

While everybody knows this, the big lie prevails. The Lie becomes the Truth.

The United Nations Security Council resolution calls upon member states to suppress the recruiting, organizing, transporting,
equipping and financing of foreign terrorist fighters, Specifically, the resolution points to the the particular and urgent need to
implement this resolution with respect to those foreign terrorist fighters who are associated with ISIL [Islamic State of Iraq and
the Levant], ANF [Al-Nusrah Front] and other cells, affiliates, splinter groups or derivatives of Al-Qaida But are these not
precisely the opposition freedom fighters trained and recruited by the Western military alliance in their quest to unseat the
government of Bashar Al Assad?
United Nations Security Council Meeting, September 24, 2014, chaired by president Obama

The ISIL are the foot soldiers of the Western military alliance. Their unspoken mandate is to wreck havoc and destruction in
Syria and Iraq, acting on behalf of their US sponsors. The endgame is to transform countries into territories.

John McCain with leaders of Al Qaeda entities in Syria

Political leaders present at the UN Security Council session applauded the US counter-terrorism initiative. Frances President
Francois Hollande pointed to the fact that:
"terrorism has taken on another dimension, and it wants to conquer territory now.

Several US allies including Jordan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar which are currently involved in supporting ISIL and Al
Nusrah are now involved in the US sponsored air raids allegedly targeted against the ISIL inside Syria.

Turkey and Jordan have borders with Syria. Saudi Arabia and Turkey have borders with Iraq. The direct military involvement
of these countries points to a scenario of escalation and sectarian warfare extending from the Mediterranean to Central Asia.

In this regard, Turkey has already announced that it will be involved in ground operations inside Syria and Iraq. The newly-
elected Prime Minister Ahmet Davutolu announced (a day prior to the UN Security Council meeting) that his government will
be seeking the endorsement of the Turkish Parliament to intervene militarily in both Iraq and Syria.

What is at stake is a so-called no fly zone in disguise, a justification to bomb Iraq and Syria under a counter-terrorism
mandate, largely targeting the civilian population. The political architects of the Islamic State including president Obama,
prime minister Cameron and their counterparts in France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, et al, are now waging a military
campaign against the Islamic State, which they themselves created. Boots on the ground are also contemplated. According to
Iraqi government sources, the US will be deploying sending ome 13,000 troops to Iraq.

The leaders of western countries are either utterly ignorant and stupid, or totally corrupt and complicit? The Terrorists R US.
Moreover, they seem totally unaware of the broad implications of their actions.

War propaganda is a criminal act under Nuremberg: Crime against the Peace. By upholding the lies and fabrications of US
foreign policy, the mainstream media is complicit in war crimes.

Britains Prime Minister David Cameron is to bring the matter to the British parliament. The revocation of citizenship is
contemplated in Britain as well as in Canada for those suspected of supporting the jihadist movement. While Britains Prime
minister has called upon Her Majestys government:

"to restrict or rescind the passports of British jihadists Home Secretary Theresa May has threatened to deprive
those Britons already fighting with the Islamic State of their citizenship.

Ironically, Prime Minister Cameron is complicit in facilitating and organizing within the UK the recruitment of British jihadists.
And indeed one might suggest, pending the formulation of criminal charges, that his passport should be revoked for
supporting the jihadist movement.

George W. Bush stated in 2001:

"you are either with us or with the terrorists.

The forbidden truth is that the US is involved in a diabolical undertaking: it has created an Islamic terror network with a view to
destroying sovereign countries and now it is waging a war against its own terror network. Without media propaganda, this
military agenda under the guise of counter-terrorism would fall flat, collapse like a deck of cards.

The US president and his indefectible British ally R the Terrorists, they are the state sponsors of terrorism, with a view to
waging a war of conquest. The United Nations is complicit in this undertaking.

Washington Admits, War On Terror Is Designed To Be Permanent State of War


September 26 2014 | From: CounterCurrentNews
Senior officials with the Obama administration recently told the United States Senate that the War on
Terror, including the renewed invasion of Iraq, premised on fighting the so-called Islamic State of
ISIS, will continue for at least another decade or two, in their words.

Assistant Defense Secretary Michael Sheehan testified before the Senate Armed Services Committees back on May
16, 2013, regarding the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force. Then, last October of the same year, senior
Obama officials anonymously revealed to the Washington Post that their new disposition matrix computer system
will be used indefinitely.

The disposition matrix will be used to determine how a terrorist suspect is to be disposed of by the United States. This
might include indefinite detention, or prosecution in a real court. In some cases it can and will include assassination-by-drone,
or by the CIA. In any case, this disposition matrix was said to be needed a full 12 years after the attacks on 9/11 which were
used as the original justification for this endless War on Terror.

"Among senior Obama administration officials, there is a broad consensus that such operations are likely to be
extended at least another decade. Given the way al-Qaida continues to metastasize, some officials said no clear
end is in sight. . . . That timeline suggests that the United Stateshas reached only the midpoint of what was once
known as the global war on terrorism.

The former reporter for Wired, Spencer Ackerman, now the Guardian USs national security editor, said asked at a Senate
hearing today how long the war on terrorism will last, Michael Sheehan, the assistant secretary of defense for special
operations and low-intensity conflict, answered, At least 10 to 20 years. . . . A spokeswoman, Army Col. Anne Edgecomb,
clarified that Sheehan meant the conflict is likely to last 10 to 20 more years from today atop the 12 years that the conflict
has already lasted. Welcome to Americas Thirty Years War.

Military historian Andrew Bacevich has warned for years that US policy planners now have an explicit doctrine of what he calls
endless war.

Read the full story at: CounterCurrentNews


An Excellent Televised Expos:
The Facts On Banksters, Perpetual War & Fooling Sheeple
September 24 2014 | From: Youtube

Ken O'Keefe Enters The Halls Of American Sainthood With This Shining Moment On TV

His Magnum Opus, the masterpiece. He is a former US Marine and war Veteran and provides a brilliant analysis of what is
really going on with banksters, their never ending wars and how the elite are playing the people for fools.

O'Keefe was the one who singlehandedly disarmed the top commandos who tried to massacre the activists on the Mavi
Marmara.

War Mongering Alert: ISIS Could Attack New Zealand Too!


September 20 2014 | From: AotearoaAWiderPerspective

Yesterday I predicted that the propaganda machine would start here in New Zealand between 1 and
14 days and boy was I right!
It is now well known that ISIS - or whatever the U.S. Nazi Zionists are calling 'it' (their provably funded manufactured opponent) on this particular day of
the week, is a CIA-run strategic appliance, just like Al-CIA-da et al - for the cabal to play against themselves; faux opponents in an effort to perpetuate
their incessant self-propelled never-ending warwongering showdown to enforce a farcical, facelifted old world order.

I told one of my readers this morning that an anti terrorist raid or other violent event would not occur because that
could backlash against National and thought that might happen after the elections when John Key will try to form a
government but today a scaremongering article was published.

This is the typical technique of leaders who want to go to war or scare the people into voting for the sitting party. People have
a tendency to stay with the government in power if they feel threatened. Change in such a situation is dangerous.

So what is the strategy?

First you soften up the public with articles like this one here. Which blatantly states: Terrorism could happen here too!

Next you raise the fear levels by raising the threat alert level. From green (low) to yellow, from yellow to orange and from
orange to red (high) . Like in Australia just before the raids and just after Prime Minister Tony Abbott announced Australia
would be sending troops

Next you target a group and conduct a raid to show the public you are in control, and that the spying has been a good thing
because they caught some villains!

To complete the scaremongering you tell the public you really did prevent an attack and that they can now sleep safely in their
beds again.

This happened numerous times in the US and the UK . In the UK there was a conviction rate of 13% with over 56% of the
arrested not even being brought before a court. In the US most plots are aided and set up by the FBI according to this
article in the Guardian.

9/11 After 13 Years


September 11 2014 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

The tragedy of September 11, 2001, goes far beyond the deaths of those who died in the towers and
the deaths of firefighters and first responders who succumbed to illnesses caused by inhalation of
toxic dust. For thirteen years a new generation of Americans has been born into the 9/11 myth that
has been used to create the American warfare/police state.
The corrupt Bush and Obama regimes used 9/11 to kill, maim, dispossess and displace millions of Muslims in seven
countries, none of whom had anything whatsoever to do with 9/11.

A generation of Americans has been born into distain and distrust of Muslims.

A generation of Americans has been born into a police state in which privacy and constitutional protections no longer exist.

A generation of Americans has been born into continuous warfare while needs of citizens go unmet.

A generation of Americans has been born into a society in which truth is replaced with the endless repetition of falsehoods.

According to the official story, on September 11, 2001, the vaunted National Security State of the Worlds Only Superpower
was defeated by a few young Saudi Arabians armed only with box cutters. The American National Security State proved to be
totally helpless and was dealt the greatest humiliation ever inflicted on any country claiming to be a power.

...

Washington concluded that 9/11 was possible because America lacked a police state.
The PATRIOT Act, which was awaiting the event was quickly passed by the congressional idiots. The Act established
executive branch independence of law and the Constitution. The Act and follow-up measures have institutionalized a police
state in the land of the free.

...

Watching the twin towers and WTC 7 come down, it was obvious to me that the buildings were not falling down as a result of
structural damage. When it became clear that the White House had blocked an independent investigation of the only three
steel skyscrapers in world history to collapse as a result of low temperature office fires, it was apparent that there was a
coverup.

After 13 years people at home and abroad find the governments story less believable.
The case made by independent experts is now so compelling that mainstream media has opened to it.

...

Over these 13 years, physicists, chemists, architects, engineers, and first responders have provided massive evidence that
completely disproves the official account of the failure of the three skyscrapers. The response to experts has been for non-
experts to call experts conspiracy theorists. In other words, the defenders of the governments story have no scientific or
factual basis on which to stand. So they substitute name-calling.

...

The 9/11 lie has persisted for 13 years. Millions of Muslims have paid for this lie with their lives, the destruction of their
families, and with their dislocation. Most Americans remain comfortable with the fact that their government has destroyed in
whole or part seven countries based on a lie Washington told to cover up an inside job that launched the crazed
neoconservatives drive for Washingtons World Empire.

Read the full story at: PaulCraigRoberts

Perpetual War, Indefinite Detention, And Torture: The U.S. And Israels Shared Values
September 5 2014 | From: Alakhbar

The United States and Israel have "shared values" but not when it comes to upholding democracy
and the rule of law. Their shared values are perpetual war, torture, indefinite detention, and military
courts. Guantanamo is a perfect example of this.

Both states have been in a state of perpetual war for quite some time with Israel against the Palestinians since its founding in
1948 while the U.S. can trace back its war to its founding in 1776 and the colonization of Native American lands.

Today's global war on terror is the latest chapter in that saga. Under perpetual war, the United States and Israel can justify a
litany of draconian policies, such as indefinite detention, torture, and extrajudicial killing.

International human rights law prohibits torture and detention without charge or trial.
The UN Convention Against Torture strictly forbids torture, even in "exceptional circumstances" like "a state of war
or threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency."

Meanwhile, article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states, "No one shall be subjected to
arbitrary arrest or detention."

The rights to a fair trial, due process, and to be free from torture and inhumane treatment are basic human rights that
governments are obliged to uphold. Yet, both the United States and Israel practice indefinite detention also known as
"administrative detention" in Israel and torture.

Read the full story at: Alakhbar

Australia And US Sign Defence Pact


August 13 2014 | From: Aljazeera

Agreement will bolster US air and naval presence in northern Australia to project more power into
the Asia Pacific.

Kerry and Hagel attended talks focused on regional security and enhanced military co-operation

The United States and Australia have signed an agreement to bolster US air and navy presence in northern Australia, under a
plan to strengthen defence ties and project more power into the Asia Pacific, where China's influence is growing.
Chuck Hagel, the US defence secretary, and John Kerry, the secretary of state, arrived in Sydney on Monday to finalise an
agreement reached between US President Barack Obama and Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott.

The pact covers the deployment of US marines to Australia for joint exercises and training in areas such as disaster relief.

Talks centred around boosting US air and naval activity in the sparsely populated and resource-rich north with an increased
tempo of visits by US fighter jets and bombers.

Around 1,150 Marines are stationed in Darwin in Australia's tropical north under a 2011 agreement that launched Obama's
push towards Asia.

The contingent, trained to respond to regional conflicts and humanitarian crises, is expected to increase to 2,500 by 2017.

The US-Australia meetings were to include discussions on co-operation in missile defence, cyber security and maritime
security, Hagel said on Monday.

Former Al-Qaeda Commander: ISIS Works For The CIA


July 15 2014 | From: Infowars

Nabil Naeem, the founder of the Islamic Democratic Jihad Party and former top al-Qaeda
commander, told the Beirut-based pan-Arab TV station al-Maydeen all current al-Qaeda affiliates,
including ISIS, work for the CIA.

Jihadist groups part of "Clean Break" plan to balkanize Middle East

What I want to tell you, the efforts of all Islamic countries, Sunni and Shiites, must combine to eradicate these
groups because these groups are the claws of colonialism in the region, Naeem said.

Naeem said ISIS, now IS or the Islamic State, is part of the neocon and Israeli Clean Break plan to balkanize the Arab and
Muslim Middle East.
The conflict is designed to be an endless war that exhausts Saudi resources and its monies, and it exhausts Iran resources
and its monies, like what they did during the days of Saddam in Iraq (with Iran).

For the full story + video visit: Infowars

Cold War Renewed With A Vengeance While Washington Again Lies


June 29 2014 | From: PaulCragiRoberts

Or: The desperations of the Cabal / Khazarian / Nazi / Zionist / Illuminati

'The Cold War made a lot of money for the military/security complex for four decades dating from Churchills March 5, 1946
speech in Fulton, Missouri declaring a Soviet Iron Curtain until Reagan and Gorbachev ended the Cold War in the late
1980s. During the Cold War Americans heard endlessly about the Captive Nations. The Captive Nations were the Baltics
and the Soviet bloc, usually summarized as Eastern Europe.

These nations were captive because their foreign policies were dictated by Moscow, just as these same Captive Nations, plus
the UK, Western Europe, Canada, Mexico, Columbia, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines,
Georgia, and Ukraine, have their foreign policies dictated today by Washington. Washington intends to expand the Captive
Nations to includ Azerbaijan, former constituent parts of Soviet Central Asia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia.

During the Cold War Americans thought of Western Europe and Great Britain as independent sovereign countries. Whether
they were or not, they most certainly are not today. We are now almost seven decades after WWII, and US troops still occupy
Germany. No European government dares to take a stance different from that of the US Department of State.

Not long ago there was talk both in the UK and Germany about departing the European Union, and Washington told both
countries that talk of that kind must stop as it was not in Washingtons interest for any country to exit the EU. The talk stopped.
Great Britain and Germany are such complete vassals of Washington that neither country can publicly discuss its own future.
When Baltasar Garzon, a Spanish judge with prosecuting authority, attempted to indict members of the George W. Bush
regime for violating international law by torturing detainees, he was slapped down.

...

What is Putin to do? He has been given 72 hours to submit to an ultimatum from a collection of puppet states that he can wipe
out at a moments notice or seriously inconvenience by turning off the flow of Russian natural gas to Europe.

Historically, such a stupid challenge to power would result in consequences. But Putin is a humanist who favors peace. He will
not willingly give up his strategy of demonstrating to Europe that the provocations are coming from Washington, not from
Russia. Putins hope, and Russias, is that Europe will eventually realize that Europe is being badly used by Washington.

...

This was the Ukraine scenario. With Putin replaced with a compliant Russian, richly rewarded by Washington, only China
would remain as an obstacle to American [ Cabal / Khazarian / Nazi / Zionist / Illuminati ] world hegemony.

Read the full story at: PaulCraigRoberts

Putin Orders Central Russian Troops On 'Full Combat Alert'


June 23 2014 | From: Yahoo

Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered his troops in central Russia to be on "full combat alert" Saturday as a new
wave of attacks by rebels supportive of his regime placed pressure on a ceasefire agreement in Ukraine.
According to Agence France-Presse, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu told Russian news agencies the order took effect
Saturday morning.

"In accordance with his (Putin's) order, from 11:00 am Moscow time (0700 GMT) the troops of the central military district ...
have been put on full combat alert," Shoigu was quoted as saying.

Putin's order came about 13 hours after Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko ordered a ceasefire Friday between his troops
and pro-Russian rebels in the east of the country. Poroshenko's ceasefire announcement was part of his plan to decrease
tensions between his government and the rebels following months of tensions in Ukraine after protests that saw the country's
pro-Moscow President Viktor Yanukovych ousted earlier this year and led to elections where Poroshenko was installed earlier
this month.

Poroshenko's ceasefire deal was immediately threatened by what the Ukrainian government described as multiple rebel
attacks Friday night and Saturday morning. Rebel leaders said Ukrainian troops were the ones ignoring the ceasefire.
According to The Associated Press, prominent rebel leader Pavel Gubarev told the Rossiya-24 TV channel Ukrainian soldiers
were either disobeying Poroshenko or the president was "lying" about the deal.

"There is no ceasefire at all," Gubarev said.

Putin's "full combat alert" order also came shortly after Russia beefed up its military presence on the Ukrainian border last
week. According to The Associated Press, Shoigu said troops in Russia's central military district, which includes the Volga
region and the Ural mountains, will conduct combat drills from June 21 through June 28 as a result of the order.

Russian chief of the general staff, Valery Gerasimov, said the order would affect over 65,000 troops, according to AFP.
Gerasimov also said more than 180 planes and about 60 helicopters would be involved in the "full combat alert" drills.

Putin Responds In Force After Obama Orders Atomic Bombs To Europe


June 18 2014| From: EuropeanTimes

A truly apocalyptic report issued hours ago by the Ministry of Defense (MoD) today says that President Putin has
ordered over 80,000 troops to deploy immediately to their forward operating stations on the Ukrainian border and
the immediate cut-off of all natural gas supplies to Ukraine after he received confirmation that President Obama
has placed US atomic weapons and their delivery systems in Europe.
According to this report, Russian military intelligence officials received confirmation yesterday from their counterparts at the
Foreign Intelligence Service of the Czech Republic (UZSI) that the two B-2 Stealth Bombers (Call signed Death11 and
Death12) ordered to the UK by Obama last week, along with the three B-52 Stratofortress bombers currently deployed at RAF
Fairford in Gloucestershire, have all been equipped with subsonic AGM-86 air-launched cruise missiles (ALCM) equipped with
W80 nuclear warheads.

Further to be noted, this report says, is that the Slovakian Intelligence and Security Agency (SOVA) further confirmed to their
MoD counterparts that an exercise of this formidable nuclear first-strike force in attacking Russia was directly responsible for
the disappearance of civilian aircraft from air-traffic control radars in Austria, Germany, the Czech Republic and Slovakia last
week endangering the lives of thousands.

Important to note, this report says, are that NATO troops and bases not welcome in the Slovakia and Czech Republics as the
Obama regime and its allies continue to push for total war with Russia.

As evidence of the fact of the West preparing for total war against Russia, this report continues, NATO Secretary-General
Anders Fogh Rasmussen said in an interview published yesterday that it is preparing measures to help Ukraine defend itself
in its stand-off with Russia, and must adapt to the fact that Moscow now views it as an adversary. And Germanys highly
influential Heinrich Bll Foundation further stated This is a war, and Russia is involved.

...

To the atrocities and war crimes that the Obama regime backed Ukraine government has committed against its own peoples
that have caused over 122,000 of its own citizens to flee to Russia for protection, this report says, it should be noted they will
not escape punishment. And as exampled by Investigative Committee head Sergei Bastrykin who this past week warned that
those who are guilty of committing military crimes in eastern Ukraine will be punished, even if they hide at the bottom of the
ocean.

As even Pope Francis this week warned that the global economy is near collapse, and as the American elites responsible for
it are on trial in the court of public opinion, and the verdict is just about to come in (as evidenced by the stunning election
defeat of one of their top war leaders, Eric Cantor, last week), this report grimly states, the Obama regimes main propaganda
mouthpiece, the New York Times, published an editorial last week stunningly saying that Lack Of Major Wars May Be
Hurting Economic Growth.

And as the Obama regime and is bankster allies continues their push for a nuclear war against Russia, this report concludes,
it should not be forgotten that what the US is doing now it has done many, many times before, including in 1917, when after
almost two years of heavy anti-German propaganda in the US press that built an overwhelming public support for our joining
that war against Germany, Congress found that in March 1915;

J.P. Morgan interests had bought 25 of Americas leading newspapers, and inserted their own editors, in order to
control the media so that American would join the war on Englands side.

...

All that remains unknown now, and before the nuclear bombs start falling, is if the American people will awaken and stop the
madness of their crazed war leaders before its too late for everyone.

Read the full article with links at: EuropeanTimes

War Industry Stands To Make Billions Off ISIS Threat


June 17 2014 | From: Infowars

It is now well known that the CIA trained, provided weapons to and trained Al Qaeda (Al-CIAda). The top level of the
intelligence community worldwide are well aware that Al Qaeda does not really exist - except for the Cabal run CIA
front that it is. They cause manufactured problems for the Cabal fronts to provide 'solutions' for.

Fake terrorist organisations are in play all around the globe. Sometimes they are paid mercenary operations that
operate as fake orgaisations for cover. It is also well known that Blackwater / Xe / Academi / Greystone is often
running such undertakings for the Cabal. This company has such public awareness now that it keeps changing its
name in an vain attempt to deflect attention. It's most recent well know exploits are in the Ukraine.

The point is - how long are the public going to continue to be fooled by this manipulated Problem / Reaction /
Solution sham? And now there is a new player in this theatre - ISIS...

Good chance military hardware will end up in the hands of Islamic terror group
In the war business, timing is everything.

For instance, timing appears to be a factor in the ISIS advance in Iraq and the dysfunctional Iraqi governments response to it,
at least for the war industry.

Last month it was announced a few outstanding members of the military-industrial complex would stand to rake in around a
billion dollars if an arms sale to the Iraqi government was approved by Congress.

Considering the current situation in Iraq and alarm bells echoing through the halls of Congress, the sale will undoubtedly go
through without a hitch.

On Monday AllGov.com posted details of the sale to the floundering Shia regime in Baghdad:

Beechcraft Defense Co. and eight other contractors are selling 24 AT-6C Texan II aircraft, plus spares and other equipment
to Iraq. That deal is worth about $790 million. The plane is used for light attack and intelligence, surveillance and
reconnaissance.

AM General has a deal to send 200 of its venerable Humvees to help guard oil installations. The contract, which includes
spares and equipment such as radios and machine gun mounts, is worth $101 million.

Raytheon has a $90-million deal for seven aerostats along with 14 Rapid Aerostat Initial Deployment (RAID) Tower systems
to be used for command and control by the Iraqi military.

These are just the latest in a string of sales of military equipment to the Iraqi government. Others have included
Stinger missiles, C-130J cargo planes, drones and patrol boats, the web site reports.

The Pentagon has invested around $15 billion in training, weapons and equipment for the fledgling Iraq government.

In November, the Obama announced he would increase intelligence support and provide new weaponry to Baghdad in
response to advances by al-Qaeda, a move described a notable shift for his administration.

In December, The New York Times reported the Obama administration had provided the Iraqi military with three sensor-laden
Aerostat balloons, given three additional reconnaissance helicopters to the Iraqi military and said it planned to send 48 Raven
reconnaissance drones before the end of this year. In addition, the U.S. said it planned to deliver this fall F-16 fighters Iraq has
bought.

If delivered ahead of schedule in response to the current situation, there is a distinct possibility this military hardware will fall
into the hands of ISIS.

Electronic War Games Blamed For Jets Vanishing Off Radars In Europe
June 14 2014 | From: RT

Electronic military exercises were to blame for the mysterious disappearance of dozens of planes from air-traffic
control screens in the heart of Europe, Slovak authorities have said.
About 50 planes temporarily disappeared from radars in Austria, Germany, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia between June 5
and June 10, Austria's flight safety monitor said.

German and Czech air traffic control also reported brief disappearances. Slovakia blamed the outages on planned military
exercises.

The disappearance of objects on radar screens was connected with a planned military exercise which took place
in various parts of Europe...whose goal was the interruption of radio communication frequencies," the Slovak air
traffic services said in a statement.

"This activity also caused the temporary disappearance of several targets on the radar display, while in the
meantime the planes were in radio contact with air traffic controllers and continued in their flight normally.

Right after the problem with the radars was detected, the organizing party was made aware and the exercises were stopped,
Slovakia's air traffic services added.

Slovakia did not mention a military force involved in the exercises, but Austrian media pointed towards NATO.

Austrian daily Kurier reported on June 7 that the first disappearance problems coincided with NATO conducting electronic
warfare exercises in Hungary.

During the exercises NATO was reportedly using devices that can interfere with enemy radar, according to the Telegraph.

German air traffic control stated that it is trying to identify the cause of the outages.

Planes disappeared from screens for a matter of seconds, here and there. The outages were sporadic and not
grave...It must have been an external source of disruption, a spokesperson said.

Authorities said the outages did not pose any serious threat.
Architect Richard Gage On 9/11: TVNZ Close Up
June 6 2014 | From: TVNZ

Much respect to Television New Zealand for being a Mainstream Media outlet that will carry this story.
Mike Hosking interviews Richard Gage on his, and many learned opinions on the 9/11 attack.

Also see: WTC 7 Now A Proven Case Of Controlled Demolition

World War II: The Unknown War


June 5 2014 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

In my June 6 column, The Lies Grow More Audacious, I mentioned that Obama and the British prime minister,
who Obama has as a lap dog, just as George Bush had Tony Blair as lap dog, had managed to celebrate the defeat
of Nazi Germany at the 70th anniversary of the Normandy invasion without mentioning the Russians.

I pointed out the fact, well known to historians and educated people, that the Red Army defeated Nazi Germany long before
the US was able to get geared up to participate in the war. The Normandy invasion most certainly did not defeat Nazi
Germany. What the Normandy invasion did was to prevent the Red Army from overrunning all of Europe.
As I have reported in a number of columns, many, if not most, Americans have beliefs that are not fact-based, but instead
are emotion-based. So I knew that at least one person would go berserk, and he did. JD from Texas wrote to set me straight.
No one but our American boys won that war. JD didnt know that the Russians were even in the war.

JD had the option of consulting an encyclopedia or a history book or going online and consulting Wikipedia prior to making a
fool of himself. But he chose instead to unload on me. JD epitomizes US foreign policy: rush into every fight that you know
nothing about and start new ones hand over fist that someone else will win.

It occurred to me that World War II was so long ago that few are alive who remember it, and by now even these few probably
remember the propaganda version that they have heard at every Memorial Day and July 4th occasion since 1945. Little
wonder that neither Obama nor Cameron or their pitiful speech writers knew nothing about the war that they were
commemorating.

Propaganda has always been with us. The difference is that in the 21st century Americans have nothing but propaganda.
Nothing else at all. Just lies. Lies are the American experience. The actual world as it exists is foreign to most Americans.

In 1973 a British television documentary series was


released that chronicled WW II. Of the 28 episodes, only 3
and a part of a 4th acknowledge Russian participation in the
war. From the British standpoint, victory was an Anglo-
American victory.

This did not sit well with the Soviet government.

The Soviets offered their film archives to the West. In 1978


a 20 part series of 48 minutes per episode was released in
an American documentary television series narrated by Burt
Lancaster. The documentary was titled: The Unknown
War.

Certainly, it was a war unknown to most Americans, raised


as they are on propaganda. The Unknown War was a
revelation to Americans because it demonstrated beyond all
doubt that Nazi Germany lost World War II on the Russian
front.

Of the 20 episodes, The Allies, that is, the Anglo-


Americans and free French, feature only in number 17. One
out of twenty is about the correct proportion of the Wests
participation in the defeat of Nazi Germany.

If you google The Unknown War you will find an entry on


Wikipedia. The series might still be available on YouTube.

It was taken off the air when the Soviets invaded


Afghanistan, a folly repeated by dumbshit Washington.

An American WW II propaganda poster - Oh the bleak irony

It was more important to Washington that Russia be demonized than any truths should be presented, so the truth revealed in
The Unknown War was removed from US TV. Later the documentary reappeared on the History Channel.
In my June 6 article, I said, following the consensus of
historians, that Nazi Germany lost the war at Stalingrad.

In this article historian Dr. Jacques R. Pauwels says that


Germany lost the war 14 months earlier at the Battle of
Moscow in December 1941.

He makes a good case. Whether one agrees or not, the


facts he presents are eye openers for the exceptional,
indispensable Americans who believe nothing happens
without them.

Normandy, June 1944, is 3.5 years after Germany lost the


war in the Battle of Moscow. As historians have made clear,
by June 1944 Germany had little left with which to fight.
Whatever was left of the German military was on the
Eastern Front.

At the 70th annual Normandy landing celebration in France,


Obama informed his French vassal, President Hollande,
that he, Obama, the ruler of the Exceptional Country, would
not sit down to dinner with the Russian Putin.

Americans are too good to eat dinner with Russians. So


Hollande had to have two dinners. One for Obama, and
then one for Putin.

As food is still good in France thanks to the banning of


GMOs, probably Holland didnt mind. I myself would have
enjoyed being at both dinners for the food alone.

"The Unknown War" Documentary

Like all news that is important, the dinner for Putin, and its meaning, escaped the attention of the American presstitute media,
the worlds greatest collection of whores. If memory serves, normally the Russians are left out of the Normandy
commemoration celebrations. If the war was won in the West, what did the Russians have to do with it? Nothing, of course.
Our boys did it all, just as JD informed me. Russians? What Russians?

But this time France invited Putin to the Normandy celebration, and Putin was not too proud to come. Putin spoke with
European politicians in the off moments, and these politicians saw a real person, unlike Obama, a total fake.

The superiority of Russian diplomacy over Washingtons is clear to all. Putins position is: we are here for you, we can work
things out. Washingtons position is: do as we say or we will bomb you into the stone age.

Russia is accommodating to its client states. Washington is not. Putin says that he is willing to work things out with the
billionaire corrupt Oligarch imposed on Ukraine by Washington, but Washington has forced the Bulgarians to stop work on
the South Stream Pipeline.
This natural gas pipeline bypasses Ukraine by going under the Black Sea to Bulgaria. As Washingtons new puppet state in
Ukraine has not paid its multi-billion dollar natural gas bill to Russia and threatens to disrupt the pipeline to Europe and to
steal gas from it, Russia, despite Western sanctions, made preparations for a new pipeline route in order that Europeans do
not suffer from winter cold and have their industries shut down and economies collapse from lack of energy.

Washington sees Putins commitment to Europe as a threat and has gone to work to prevent any Russian energy flows to
Europe.

In contrast with Putins position, Washingtons position is: We dont give a hoot what happens to our European puppets. Like
the rest of humanity, European puppets dont count and are dispensable, mere collateral damage, in the Indispensable
Countrys war for world hegemony.

All that is important to Washington is that Russia is damaged regardless of the damage done to the puppet regimes in
Western and Eastern Europe, including the moronic Polish government, possibly the only government on earth more foolish
than Obamas.

Washington is trying to break off Europes economic relations with Russia. Washington is promising to supply Europe with
US natural gas obtained by fracking. This promise is a lie, like everything else Washington says.

On May 20 the Los Angeles Times reported that federal energy authorities have slashed by 96% the recoverable oil buried
in Californias vast Monterey Shale deposits. The Monterey Shale formation contains about two-thirds of the nations shale
oil reserves, and only 4% are recoverable.
William Engdahl has reported that at best the US has 20 years of natural gas from fracking, and that the price of the gas will
be the despoiling of US surface and ground waters. Experts have pointed out that the infrastructure for transporting US
natural gas to Europe does not exist and that it would take three years to build the infrastructure. What will Europe do for
three years while it waits for US energy to replace the cut-off Russian energy? Will Europe still be there?

Washingtons European vassals should take note: Washington is prepared to destroy the economies of its vassals in order to
score a one up on Russia.

How is it possible that by now Europe doesnt understand how Washington thinks? Those bags full of money must be very
large.

As I have reported several times, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security affairs told me years ago that
Washington purchases European politicians with bags full of money. It remains to be seen if European leaders are willing to
sacrifice their peoples and their own reputations in order to be complicit in the war that Washington is planning with Russia, a
war that could mean the end of life on earth.

It is Europes call. If leaders emerge who tell Washington, no dice, the world is saved. If instead European politicians want
the money, the world is doomed. Europe would be the first to go.

CIA Director Admits He Visited Kiev, Refuses To Call Russia Enemy


May 12 2014 | From: RT

John Brennan, the head of the CIA, said in an interview he did go to Kiev a few weeks ago to talk
to Ukrainian partners and friends. He also declined to call Russia an enemy dubbing it instead a
major power.
Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan - apparently speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations

While talking to Fusions Jorge Ramos, Brennan admitted to the hosts question his visit to Ukraines capital in mid-April.

I was out there to interact with our Ukrainian partners and friends. I had the opportunity to walk through the streets
of Kiev and also go to Maidan Square and see the memorials to those Ukrainians trying to find liberty and freedom
for their people, he said.

Following the visit, deposed Ukrainian president Victor Yanukovich accused Brennan of de facto sanctioning a crackdown on
pro-Russian activists in the countrys south-east.

Until now the CIA had not disclosed if and why Brennan had been to Kiev but White House spokesman Jay Carney confirmed
that the CIA director went in Kiev as part of his trip to Europe and met with high-ranked Ukrainian officials.

In the interview with Fusion, the Brennan said that the situation in Ukraine is something that needs to be addressed and
insisted that the US wants the Ukrainian people to have their ability to define their future.

We here at the CIA can work with our partners in Ukraine and other areas to give them the information, the
capabilities that they need in order to bring security and stability back to their country, said Brennan.

Read the full story at: RT


Malcolm Fraser Warns Australia Risks War With China Unless US Military Ties Cut Back
May 6 2014 | From: SydneyMorningHerald

Australia risks being pulled into a disastrous war against China because successive Australian governments have
surrendered the nation's strategic independence to Washington, former Liberal prime minister Malcolm Fraser has warned.

Pine Gap (also termed by some as 'Australia's Area 51), near Alice Springs, employs nearly 1,000 people, mainly from the Central Intelligence Agency
and the National Reconnaissance Office. Originally code-named MERINO, it is the ground station for a satellite network that intercepts telephone,
radio, data links, and other communications around the world. The facility currently includes a dozen radomes, a 5,600 square meter computer room,
and 20-odd service and support buildings. Two of its ground antenna are part of the U.S. Defense Satellite Communications System.

With tensions rising in the East China Sea between China and Japan, Mr Fraser said there was a real danger of conflict and
that he had become "very uneasy" at the level of Australia's compliance with the US's strategic interests.

Our armed forces are so closely intertwined with theirs and we really have lost the capacity to make our own
strategic decisions," Mr Fraser said.

He said the high level of military integration, including through bases such as Pine Gap, meant Australia would have difficulty
convincing the world that it was not taking part in a US-led conflict even if, formally, Canberra tried to stay out of it.

The comments represent the most serious questioning by a current or past government leader of the dominant assumption in
Australia's foreign policy since World War II namely, that an ever closer US alliance is inherently in Australia's security
interests.

With US President Barack Obama visiting north Asia (although not China) and confirming the US would back Japan in any
conflict over disputed islands in the East China Sea, Mr Fraser has called for a more basic interpretation of the ANZUS treaty,
restricting its scope to consultation initially rather than the assumption of automatic military involvement.

He has also called for a new debate about Australian-American military-to-military ties, warning that the secretive Pine Gap
facility would become a military target as it would likely be pivotal to the US capability to identify and neutralise Chinese
nuclear weapons sites.

Read the full story and see the video at: SydneyMorningHerald
Putin: Washington Behind Ukraine Events All Along, Though Flying Low
April 30 2014 | From: RT

The US has been behind the Ukrainian crisis from the beginning, but was initially flying low, Russian President Vladimir Putin
has said. He added that if sanctions continue, Russia will have to reconsider who has access to key sectors if its economy.

I think what is happening now shows us who really was mastering the process from the beginning. But in the beginning, the
United States preferred to remain in the shadow, Putin said, as quoted by RIA Novosti.

Putin stated that since the US has taken a lead role in resolving the political crisis in Ukraine, it is telling that they originally
were behind this process, but now they just have emerged as leaders of it.

The "Maidan cookies" policy paves the way to a broader crisis, Putin warned, referring to US officials showing up in central
Kiev and encouraging protesters during demonstrations.

Reat the full story at: RT

Washington Drives The World To War


April 15 2014 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

The CIA director was sent to Kiev to launch a military suppression of the Russian separatists in the eastern and southern
portions of Ukraine, former Russian territories for the most part that were foolishly attached to the Ukraine in the early years of
Soviet rule.
Washingtons plan to grab Ukraine overlooked that the Russian and Russian-speaking parts of Ukraine were not likely to go
along with their insertion into the EU and NATO while submitting to the persecution of Russian speaking peoples. Washington
has lost Crimea, from which Washington intended to eject Russia from its Black Sea naval base. Instead of admitting that its
plan for grabbing Ukraine has gone amiss, Washington is unable to admit a mistake and, therefore, is pushing the crisis to
more dangerous levels.

If Ukraine dissolves into secession with the former Russian territories reverting to Russia, Washington will be embarrassed
that the result of its coup in Kiev was to restore the Russian provinces of Ukraine to Russia. To avoid this embarrassment,
Washington is pushing the crisis toward war.

The CIA director instructed Washingtons hand-picked stooge government in Kiev to apply to the United Nations for help in
repelling terrorists who with alleged Russian help are allegedly attacking Ukraine. In Washingtons vocabulary, self-
determination is a sign of Russian interference. As the UN is essentially a Washington-financed organization, Washington will
get what it wants.

The Russian government has already made it completely clear some weeks ago that the use of violence against protesters in
eastern and southern Ukraine would compel the Russian government to send in the Russian army to protect Russians, just as
Russia had to do in South Ossetia when Washington instructed its Georgian puppet ruler to attack Russian peacekeeping
troops and Russian residents of South Ossetia.

Washington knows that the Russian government cannot stand aside while one of Washingtons puppet states attacks
Russians. Yet, Washington is pushing the crisis to war.

The danger for Russia is that the Russian government will rely on diplomacy, international organizations, international
cooperation, and on the common sense and self-interest of German politicians and politicians in other of Washingtons
European puppet states.

Read the full story at: PaulCraigRoberts


Hijacked IBM Engineer From MH370 Successfully Dialled Out Of Diego Garcia US
Military Base In The Indian Ocean
March 31 2014 | BeforeItsNews / JimStoneFreelance

Updated: See story below: Partner Of MH370 Passenger Accuses Governments Of Cover Up On BBC
The story below is virtually assured to be legitimate and confirmed for reasons as explained:

The American military base on the island of Diego Garcia is one of the most strategically important and secretive U.S. military installations outside the
United States. Located near the remote center of the Indian Ocean and accessible only by military transport, the base was a little-known launch pad for
the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and may house a top-secret CIA prison where terror suspects are interrogated and tortured.

The man, Philip Wood, claimed to be blindfolded when he sent the message. When the American military blindfolds someone,
it is accomplished by putting a bag over the head that is locked so you can't get it off. This left the engineers hands free.

This would have made it possible for him to pull his Iphone 5 (a fact confirmed by the Exif data) out of his butt as stated, and
use the voice command ability of the Iphone to just talk to it to log in and post the message. This explains why he sent a black
photo, he could not see what he was sending, he just knew he snapped a photo and sent whatever got taken.

The Coordinates

When the coordinates are added to the fact that the photo's exif data does not match the Google coordinates or any other
coordinates for Diego Garcia that are posted online, but is still within the boundaries of Diego Garcia, it proves that no one just
pulled those coordinates off the web. It helps confirm that this was not just a hoax because the coordinates are exact to
wherever on Diego Garcia the Iphone was when it took the photo.

The image, which appears black was posted as taken in a dark cell by an IBM engineer. The picture is black because the cell
was too dark, but a critical piece of information was embedded in the Exif data, the coordinates to Diego Garcia, where the
picture was taken. And it's real, this is NOT a hoax.

The coordinates in the picture indicate that the photo was taken within 3 miles of what Google officially gives for Diego Garcia.
It is NOT EXACTLY what comes up on Google. It is off a couple miles, so NO ONE GOOGLED THIS, thus helping to confirm
it's authenticity. I don't know how big the island is, but if it has a runway, that certainly fits.

The picture posted with the following text:


"I have been held hostage by unknown military personal after my flight was hijacked (blindfolded). I work for IBM and I
have managed to hide my cellphone in my ass during the hijack. I have been separated from the rest of the
passengers and I am in a cell. My name is Philip Wood. I think I have been drugged as well and cannot think clearly."

Image Exif Data: The Smoking Gun

The Exif is intact. Exif data gets embedded in every image by every camera and includes the circumstances under which the
photo was taken. It can be viewed by saving the image to your desktop, and then right clicking it and selecting image
properties. Hit the details tab.

You can see that the image was taken on March 18 with an Iphone 5, with the ISO at 3200 and a shutter of 1/15. The
coordinates are included in the exif data because the Iphone knows where it is, and the coordinates are for Diego Garcia. THE
FIRST TIME A BLANK PHOTO SAID IT ALL.

Exif can't be rewritten with common software, it can only be added to in fields such as image credits with some advanced
applications applications. It can be erased as well but NOT CHANGED. Photos with the exif intact will hold up in court. If the
Exif is hacked and this is not real, the CIA or a really good hacker did this, which I doubt, I'd say it's probably real.

Surrounding this story is the fact that the man who managed to get this information to Farganne (forum member Glitch) was
harassed and received many threatening voice mails over it, that is another piece of evidence pointing to this as being real.

One thing is certain, once it's posted here on this site the genie is OUT OF THE BOTTLE. I cannot stress how important it is
that the GPS coordinates in the photo do not perfectly match what Google says and are not posted anywhere on the web,
because it proves that the source of those coordinates did not come from google or Wikipedia, they really did come from the
imaging device and it HAD TO be at Diego Garcia when it took the photo.

Read the full story at: JimStoneFreelance

Prior Story: Wife Of Philip Woods Interviewed By BBC


March 29 2014 | From: Intellihub

Partner Of MH370 Passenger Accuses Governments Of Cover Up On BBC


In a BBC interview, the partner of missing passenger says that the MH370 flight was stolen and taken to an
undisclosed location, due to the number of high-profile passengers aboard with ties to defense contractors.
Sarah Bajc, a 48-year-old American teacher recently appeared on BBC News to discuss the disappearance of her partner
Phillip Wood.

Phillip Wood is one of the 277 passengers aboard the missing Malaysian flight. Sarah Bajc is among a large number of friends
of family members who dont believe official reports that the plane crashed and killed everyone inside.

The many governments involved in this investigation are not putting forward any evidence to the theories that they are
suggesting, and to make matters even more confusing, the apparent evidence continues to change by the day.

During her interview on the BBC, Sarah Bajc not only said that the governments involved in the investigation were intentionally
misleading the world, but she also called attention to the suspicious number of high-profile people aboard the plane, many of
whom had connections with defense contractors.

As we reported earlier this week, there were at least 20 passengers on the plane who were extremely talented and valuable
employees of Freescale Semiconductor Ltd., a Rothschild front group currently researching highly sensitive technology.

During the interview Sarah Bajc also said that there is no evidence that the plane crashed at all. She believes that the plane
was stolen and taken somewhere, in order to kidnap the high-profile people who were on it."

FBI Declassifies Files Showing Hitler Did Not Die In Germany


March 9 2014 | IlluminatiReview

Newly declassified FBI documents prove that the government knew Hitler was alive and well, and living in the Andes
Mountains long after World War II.

On April 30 1945, Adolf Hitler committed suicide in his underground bunker. His body was later discovered and identified by
the Soviets before being rushed back to Russia. Is it really possible that the Soviets have been lying all this time, and that
history has purposely been rewritten?

No one thought so until the release of the FBI documents. It seems that it is possible that the most hated man in history
escaped war torn Germany and lived a bucolic and peaceful life in the beautiful foothills of the Andes Mountains.

The Intelligence Community Knew.


Recently released FBI documents are beginning to show that not only was Hitler and Eva Brauns suicide faked, the infamous
pair might have had help from the director of the OSS himself, Allen Dulles.

In one FBI document from Los Angles, it is revealed that the agency was well aware of a mysterious submarine making its
way up the Argentinian coast dropping off high level Nazi officials. What is even more astonishing is the fact that the FBI knew
he was in fact living in the foothills of the Andes.

Who is the Mysterious Informant?

In a Los Angeles letter to the Bureau in August of 1945, an unidentified informant agreed to exchange information for political
asylum. What he told agents was stunning.

The informant not only knew Hitler was in Argentina, he was one of the confirmed four men who had met the German
submarine. Apparently, two submarines had landed on the Argentinian coast, and Hitler with Eva Braun was on board the
second.

The Argentinian government not only welcomed the former German dictator, but also aided in his hiding. The informant went
on to not only give detailed directions to the villages that Hitler and his party had passed through, but also credible physical
details concerning Hitler.

While for obvious reasons the informant is never named in the FBI papers, he was credible enough to be believed by some
agents.

The FBI Tried to Hide Hitlers Whereabouts.

Even with a detailed physical description and directions the


FBI still did not follow up on these new leads. Even with
evidence placing the German sub U-530 on the Argentinian
coast shortly before finally surrounding, and plenty of eye
witness accounts of German official being dropped off, no
one investigated.

Even More Evidence is Found:

Along with the FBI documents detailing an eye witness


account of Hitlers whereabouts in Argentina, more
evidence is coming to light to help prove that Adolf Hitler
and Eva Braun did not die in that bunker.

In 1945, the Naval Attach in Buenos Aires informed


Washington there was a high probability that Hitler and Eva
Braun had just arrived in Argentina. This coincides with the
sightings of the submarine U-530. Added proof comes in the
form of newspaper articles detailing the construction of a
Bavarian styled mansion in the foothills of the Andes
Mountains.

Further proof comes in the form of architect Alejandro


Bustillo who wrote about his design and construction of
Information has emerged which indicates that the current Chancellor of Hitlers new home which was financed by earlier wealthy
Germany, Angela Merkel is either the daughter or grand daughter of
Adolf Hitler and that she is the leader of the Fourth Reich. It is German immigrants.
suggested that this photo is of the two.
Irrefutable Evidence that Hitler Escaped:

Perhaps the most damning evidence that Hitler did survive the fall of Germany lies in Russia. With the Soviet occupation of
Germany, Hitlers supposed remains were quickly hidden and sent off to Russia, never to be seen again. That is until 2009,
when an archeologist from Connecticut State, Nicholas Bellatoni was allowed to perform DNA testing on one of the skull
fragments recovered.

What he discovered set off a reaction through the intelligence and scholarly communities. Not only did the DNA not match any
recorded samples thought to be Hitlers, they did not match Eva Brauns familiar DNA either. So the question is, what did the
Soviets discover in the bunker, and where is Hitler?

Even former general and President Dwight D. Eisenhower wrote to Washington.

It was not only General Eisenhower who was concerned over Hitlers compete disappearance, Stalin also expressed his
concerns. In 1945, the Stars and Stripes newspaper quoted then General Eisenhower as believing that the real possibility
existed of Hitler living safely and comfortably in Argentina.

Is it Possible?

With all of the new found evidence coming to light, it is possible and even likely that not only did Hitler escape from Germany;
he had the help of the international intelligence community. Released FBI documents prove that they were not only aware of
Hitlers presence in Argentina; they were also helping to cover it up.

It would not be the first time the OSS helped a high ranking Nazi official to escape punishment and capture. Look at the story
of Adolf Eichmann who was located in Argentina in the 1960s.

Did Hitler escape to Argentina? The answer is yes.

Further information on this documentary, due to be released in July 2014 is available here.

For the full story with additional links visit: IlluminatiReview

Operation Independence Continues - Anonymous Exposes United States Invasion


Plans In Ukraine
March 16 2014 | From: VoiceOfRussia

By tomorrow, the 15th of March 2014, the United States, through its agents in Ukraine, will begin a series of false flag
attacks on targets in Ukraine which have been designed to make it look as if they were carried out by the Special
Forces of the Russian Federation.

This information has been made available and was released through several forums used by Anonymous Ukraine. Members
of Anonymous Ukraine, who are involved in what Anonymous has called Operation Independence, have independently
verified that Anonymous is the source for the e-mails.

Among the three key e-mail is one containing the initial instructions from the US Army Assistant Army Attach Jason P. Gresh
to a senior official of the General Staff of the Ukrainian Army named Igor Protsuyuk. Again Anonymous has exposed treason
by Ukrainian officials and the egregious illegal meddling of the United Sates into the affairs of a sovereign nation.

Anonymous Ukraine is operating in what can only be described as a hot war zone where almost all communications and
internet access are either completely controlled and intercepted or have been shut down. Contacts in Anonymous Ukraine
have also stated that there is a campaign by the US Government and the current illegitimate regime which illegally seized
power to demonize and discredit Anonymous.
Anonymous Ukraine does not support what they call "the Bandera Nazis" because: they do not represent the Ukrainian
people, they have deposed the democratically elected president, they have destabilized the country, they have killed hundreds
of peaceful Ukrainian and they have completely taken over the media and the internet.

Anonymous Ukraine has therefore stated that those running the Facebook page under "Anonymous Ukraine" are CIA and US
Government lackeys who are promoting nazis and destroying their country before selling it to NATO, the US and the EU.

Members of Anonymous Ukraine are in fear for their safety and have stated that the Bandera nazis have issued orders to
execute those responsible for previous releases of their hacked e-mails and the recording of telephone conversations that
have been made available on-line. They have also noticed heightened activity by the NSA and CIA against all of their web
resources.

For the full story and audi visit: VoiceOfRussia

Selling War: "You Furnish the Pictures, and I'll Furnish the War."
January 29th 2012 | From GlobalResearch.ca

Throughout its history, America glorified wars in the name of peace. From inception, they're perpetuated against one
or more domestic or foreign adversaries.

They include mass killing, assaults and abuse. Pacifism's called sissy or unpatriotic. Propaganda insists America's peace-
loving. In fact, more than ever today, it's addicted to permanent war and violence.

Nonetheless, initiating them requires public support. Famed US journalist Walter Lippmann coined the phrase "manufacture of
consent." It's a euphemism for mind control.

In 1917, George Creel first used it successfully to turn pacifist Americans into raging German-haters. It works the same way
now. In 1916, Woodrow Wilson was reelected on a pledge of: "He Kept Us Out of War." Straightaway, he began planning US
involvement.

In April 1917, he established the Committee on Public Information (CPI or Creel Committee). It operated through August 1919.
Its mission was enlisting public support for war and undermining opposition sentiment.

Corporate America was so impressed, it recruited Edward Bernays, a nephew of Sigmund Freud. He became a
PR/propaganda pioneer. His 1928 book titled "Propaganda" said it's possible to "regiment the public mind every bit as much
as an army regiments their bodies."

"If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses
according to our will without their knowing about it?"

He called the technique the "engineering of consent." He invented the press release. One of his most successful campaigns
involved convincing women to smoke in public when it was considered taboo. He pursuaded business that news, not
advertising, best manipulates public opinion.

He drew on Freudian psychoanalytic ideas. In an age of mass production, he believed techniques were needed to distribute
ideas the same way. On behalf of United Fruit, his propaganda campaign helped overthrow Guatemala's democratically
elected Jacobo Arbenz Guzman.

His pioneering PR techniques got Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter to describe him and Ivy Lee as "professional
poisoners of the public mind, exploiters of foolishness, fanaticism and self-interest."

In his 1947 book titled, "The Engineering of Consent," he called it "the very essence of the democratic process, the freedom to
persuade and suggest." In fact, it's used manipulatively more for ill, than good, especially in selling war.
Australian-born social psychologist Alex Carey helped pioneer the study of corporate propaganda. His seminal work is titled,
"Taking the Risk Out of Democracy: Corporate Propaganda versus Freedom and Liberty."

He said "The twentieth century has been characterized by three developments of great political importance: the growth of
democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate
power against democracy."

Using Deception to Launch Wars

Coalition to Oppose Arms Trade coordinator Richard Sanders said:

"Throughout history, war planners have used various forms of deception to trick their enemies. Because public support is so
crucial (to wage war), the home population is also subject to deceitful stratagems. The creation of false excuses to justify
going to war is a major first step in constructing public support...."

"The corporate media (are) central to the success of" manufacturing consent. So is repetition to blot out other narratives.
Media giants and PR wizards are master mind manipulators, marshaling public support for war.

It works the same way every time. Truth is suppressed. Public fear is stoked. Patriotism and democratic values are
highlighted. People are manipulated to support war to protect national security. Wilson claimed entering WW I "kept the world
safe for democracy."

During the WW II buildup, anti-war proponents were called subversives and Nazi sympathizers. Once begun, anti-
German/Italian/Japanese propaganda censored media and other communications to enlist support. Other techniques included
posters, advertising, comic books and cartoons, leaflets, and films extolling America and portraying the axis as bad guys.

Steven Casey's ground-breaking book titled, "Selling the Korean War: Propaganda, Politics, and Public Opinion in the United
States" analyzed Truman and Eisenhower administration efforts to shape public discourse, influence media coverage, and
gain popular support for limited conflict and anti-Soviet Cold War policies.

He also showed how Truman officials redefined war as it continued with mounting casualties. His analysis used previously
unavailable archives, including government documents, papers of leading congressmen, newspaper editors, and war
correspondents. His book's the definitive word on how public opinion was manipulated during America's "forgotten war."

Noam Chomsky calls the Vietnam War "a classic example of America's propaganda system." Major media scoundrels let
doves and hawks debate, but "(b)oth sides agreed on one thing. We had a right to carry out aggression," but refused to admit
it took place.

America's presence was called defense against enemy aggression. "Like the Soviets in Afghanistan, we tried to establish" a
pro-US Saigon regime. Escalation led to invasion. Anti-war activists on principle were banned from public discourse. "The
debate was essentially over tactics," not legitimacy.

Over time, anti-war sentiment grew, especially after the January 1968 Tet Offensive and June 1971 Pentagon Papers release.
They showed the Johnson administration lied to the public and Congress. Gallup Polls showed 70% of Americans thought
Vietnam was "fundamentally wrong and immoral, not a mistake."

Opposition produced the "Vietnam Syndrome." Chomsky called it "a grave disease in the eyes of America's elites because
people understand too much."

He also discussed months of propaganda preceding Congress voting on contra aid in March 1986. He reviewed 85 New York
Times and Washington Post editorials and op-eds. All were anti-Sandanista. Opposition opinion was suppressed despite
Nicaragua directing popular social services in contrast with repressive US allies Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador.

Of course, all wars are based on lies. When major media scoundrels suppress truth, administrations get away with murder.

It was true in Central America, Grenada on the pretext of rescuing medical students, manufactured incidents to oust Panama's
Manuel Noreiga, entrapping Saddam Hussein to invade Kuwait that launched the Gulf War, 9/11 as pretext to attack
Afghanistan and continue a decade of imperial wars against nonbelligerent states.

In April 2007, Washington Post writer Tom Shales headlined, "A Media Role in Selling the War? No Question," saying:
"It's always depressing to learn that you've been had, but incalculably more so when the deception has resulted in thousands
of Americans dying in the Iraq war effort" based on lies.

As in all wars, the more people rely on television for news, the less they know, and more susceptible they become to
government and media propaganda.

In their book, "Weapons of Mass Deception: The Uses of Propaganda in Bush's War on Iraq," Sheldon Rampton and John
Stauber showed how manipulative propaganda sold the public on war.

Combining PR and media deception, Operation: Iraqi Freedom was created. Deconstructing the process, they showed how
top Bush officials planned war prior to his election, but waited until September 2002 for "product launch" to inform the public.

Using 'big lie" tactics, they associated Saddam with 9/11, forged documents to allege WMDs, and worked secretly to create
the opposition Iraqi National Congress (INC). The PR Rendon Group coined the term. It got millions in funding and worked
closely with CIA operatives. It became a driving force for war.

"Weapons of Mass Deception" exposed how aggressive PR and manipulative media convince people to go along with policies
harming their interests.

The Pentagon's very much involved. It spends half a billion dollars selling wars. Truth's suppressed doing it. Lies launch them
and continue throughout conflicts. Anti-Syrian and Iranian rhetoric replicates what preceded attacking Iraq and Libya.

On January 16, Russia Today (RT.com) reported how major media scoundrels incite war on Iran. Appearing regularly on US
television, hardline figures push it. Alternative voices are shut out.

Warmongerings constant. On-air voices cheerlead it. Slanted news shuts out truth. Former MSNBC producer Jeff Cohen said
pressure was constant to support war in the run-up to the Iraq invasion.

A Final Comment

Things remain the same. Deceptive reports manipulate the public mind on Syria and Iran. "There is no doubt that the
mainstream media are crucial in this idea of selling that the US is going to be in a perpetual war."

They're key in making Americans believe military intervention is vital. Robert Parry said:

"I've worked at Newsweek as well (as AP) and other major US news organizations. And what I saw, especially at places like
Newsweek, was this idea that the media was actually part of the establishment. It was that the American people were to be
guided more than informed."

In fact, "political solutions" are alien to America's vocabulary. War profiteers demand jingoism. A century ago people were
manipulated to accept war with Cuba. William Randolph Hearst hyped the big lie about Spain sinking the battleship Maine
when, in fact, a coal bunker explosion did it.

Hearst, however, told his Havana illustrator: "You furnish the pictures, and I'll furnish the war." To this day, lies launch them.
They're all based on lies to get people to go along with what wouldn't be possible otherwise.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the
Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and
Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

Breaking The Silence: Truth And Lies In The War On Terror


From: JohnPilger
'Breaking The Silence: Truth And Lies In The War On Terror' (2003) was screened six months after the invasion of Iraq in
March 2003 and two years after the invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001.

The film dissects the truth and lies behind the 'War on Terror', investigating the discrepancies between American and British
justification for 'war' and the facts on the ground in Afghanistan and Washington DC.

Read the full introduction at: JohnPilger

Pictures Say A Thousand Words: US and Nato Bases Surrounding Iran


February 6 2012 | From: AotearoaAWiderPerspective

Iran is threatening us right? A country without a nuclear bombs and with record of not having attacked anyone in hundreds of
years? Here is one for your raghead hating friends.

Those dots on this map are US and NATO bases surrounding Iran!

Here is another one:


United States Intelligence Director Prepares International Public for False Flag Event
February 5 2012 | From: InfoWars.com

Homeland Security Will Use The Excuse Of A Wartime Crisis To Liquidate The Resistance To The Police State

The threat that most unsettles the criminal U.S. ruling class is not the threat of Iran or the threat of terrorism, but the threat of a
second American revolution, triggered by the political awakening of the American people.

The scale of Americas political awakening and mankinds political awakening is too demographically large and geographically
widespreadto manage, ignore, or suppress with traditional methods of control such as propaganda and the political
manipulation of elections.

The incredible rise of Ron Pauls popularity despite the media conspiracy against him as well as the growing influence of the
global alternative media are proof that the American mass media has become an ineffective mind control tool.

The murderous and traitorous owners of Homeland Security Fascism who staged the tragic 9/11 events know very well that
the political awakening of the American people represents the biggest threat to their existence. The growing public awareness
of deceptions and crimes by the bankster dominated U.S. government is causing a volcanic political and psychological rift
between the American people and the globalist oligarchs.

The rift is exposing a systemic crisis within American society, which has come about after decades of acts of injustice, murder,
treason, and state terrorism against the American people by the hijacked American government.
Read the full story at: InfoWars.com

2 Minute Video: USS Enterprise False Flag Target for US War Criminals to Attack Iran?
January 28th 2012 | From: WashingtonsBlog

Iran's nuclear energy and medical isotopes are all legally accounted for in IAEA inspections with zero evidence of unlawful
use of nuclear material or technology; President Obama leads the lies of Iran's weapons for another criminal war. Mr.
Obama also leads the lies that Iran's president threatened Israel when the speech is absolutely clear he said Israel's
government will fall from within if they don't respect democracy for Palestine. A third lie is of omission to never mention that
the US overthrew Iran's democracy from 1953-1979, and then supported an unlawful invasion via Iraq from 1980-1988 that
mass-murdered about one million Iranians.

We also know that all reasons for US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were known to be lies as they were told . Anyone who
understands the crystal-clear letter and spirit of US war law can verify that US wars are not even close to lawful.

The two-minute video explains the possible false flag attack target of the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise to start war on Iran.

Read the full story at: WashingtonsBlog

Is Israel Planning Pearl Harbour False Flag Attack in the Persian Gulf?
January 23rd 2012 | From: AlethoNews.com

In a January 9 op-ed in the Jerusalem Post magazine, Avi Perry, a former intelligence expert for the Israeli government,
appears to be hinting how Israel plans to induce the United States into attacking Iran:

Iran, just like Nazi Germany in the 1940s, will take the initiative and help the US president and the American public make up
their mind by making the first move, by attacking a US aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf.

The Iranian attack on an American military vessel will serve as a justification and a pretext for a retaliatory move by the US
military against the Iranian regime. The target would not be Irans nuclear facilities. The US would retaliate by attacking Irans
navy, their military installations, missile silos, airfields. The US would target Irans ability to retaliate, to close down the Strait of
Hormuz. The US would then follow by targeting the regime itself.

Elimination of Irans nuclear facilities? Yes. This part would turn out to be the final act, the grand finale. It might have been the
major target, had the US initiated the attack. However, under this Pearl Harbor scenario, in which Iran had launched a
surprise attack on the US navy, the US would have the perfect rationalization to finish them off, to put an end to this ugly
game.

Unlike the latest attempt at an Iranian revolution, this time the US would not shy away, rather, it would go public, openly calling
for the Iranian people to join in with the US in working to overthrow the corrupt Islamic fundamentalist regime. The Iranian
people would respond in numbers.

Spring would reemerge, and the Iranian people would join the rest of the Middle East this time with the direct support of the
US.

The greatest irony behind this most significant episode in 2012 is that the Iranian regime would affect their own demise.
Attacking the US navy in the open seas is equivalent to carrying out a suicide bombing.

From: AlethoNews.com
Webster Tarpley on the Geopolitics of World War 3 in 2012

Ex-Israeli Intelligence Officer:


Pearl Harbor Style Attack Will Be Pretext For War On Iran
January 15th 2012 | From: PrisonPlanet.com

Former Israeli intelligence officer Avi Perry writes that a surprise Pearl Harbor-style Iranian attack on an American warship in
the Persian Gulf will provide the pretext for the US to launch all-out warfare against Iran.
Ex Israeli Intelligence Officer: Pearl Harbor Style Attack Will Be Pretext For War On Iran strait of hormuz 12 29 2011

Given the fact that former Vice President Dick Cheneys office openly considered staging a false flag attack on a US vessel in
the Persian Gulf to blame it on Iran as a pretext for war, Perrys summation of how 2012 will see to a new war, cannot be
taken lightly.

Read the full story at PrisonPlanet.com

False Flag Terrorism explained: A Star Wars Analogy

Is Obi-Wan Kenobi a Wacko Conspiracy Theorist? This video summarizes the 'Star Wars' prequel trilogy's political storyline,
which is that of false flag war and terror.

Just as the original 'Star Wars' trilogy was modeled after folklore and mythology, such as the legend of King Arthur, the
prequel trilogy was modeled after political history. 'Star Wars' creator George Lucas has said of his villain Palpatine, "It's not
the first time a politician has created a war to try to stay in office." There are countless examples of governments attacking
their own people as happened in 'Star Wars', not excepting the U.S. at all.

For a good documentary showing the 'Star Wars'-esque history of false flag terror and war, check out the documentary
'Terrorstorm', by Alex Jones, available for free on YouTube.

False Flag Attacks, Fake Terrorism & Engineered Wars

Part 1: Click here


Part 2: Click here

Part 3: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/false-flag-engineered-wars-1.shtml

You might also like