24

SCLSkin Conductance Level

SCL SCL SCL

[1]
[2]

[3]

[4]
[5]

[6][7]

[8]

[9]
/

No. 2012BAH08F06
[10][11][12]
EEGElectroencephalogramECGElectrocardiogram
Respiration RateRSPGSRGalvanic Skin Response
SCSkin Conductance EOSEyes on Screen[13]
SCL
SCL

1.1
Emotion

1.2
Autonomic Nervous System
ANS

SCL NS-
SCRsNonspecific Skin Conductance Responses
SCL SCL
s

SCL

SCL

SCL

SC Ward R D& Marsden P H

SC
SCL

SC
SCL SCR
SCL
SCR SCL
SC
SCL
2
2.1
24 20 4
19~25 21.17 1.34
24 ABCD 4 6
2.2
2.2.1
VB
Access

1 ab
cd

bd

C C

a
NCEP01Zhang ming4
2.2.2

Nielsen
0
1 2
3 4

2.3
,(Latin
square design) 1
2.4
SCL NeuroDyne Medical Corporation
NeuroDyne System/3

NeuroDyne System/3
10HzSCL

SCL 220
 19 SCL
2.5

3
SCL

2.6
SPSS16.0 Wilcoxon t
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Discriminability of Usability Issue Severities for Various
Functional Interfaces Within an Analog System
First, an analysis was performed on whether significant differences among
the severities of usability issues for various functional interfaces within
the experimental information system are present. Subjective user evaluations
were used to determine the severity of four functional interface usability
issues, the results of which are shown in Table 2.
On the subjective evaluation results for the severity of interface
usability issues, the Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed, the results of
which are as shown in Table 3.
Results showed that the subjective user evaluations on the severities of
usability issues for the various interfaces were as follows: interface
(d)displayed the most severe usability issues, followed by interface (b),
while the usability issues in interface (a) and interface (c) were least
severe, or perhaps even non-existent, 0.05
 The simulation results were consistent with usability design
predictionsshowing that
3.2 Effect of Usability Issue Severity on Mean User SCL During
Interaction
Means were taken of SCL data for each of the subjects during interaction
with the four interfaces, producing corresponding mean SCL data for each of
the four interfaces. On the SCL means, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was
performed, the results of which are shown in Table 4. If P>=0.05, then the
distribution of the given sample SCL means fit a normal distribution curve.
A paired sample t-test was performed on the user SCL means, the results
of which are shown in Table 5. The results showed that, while P<=0.05, the
presence and severity of usability problems had no significant effect on user
SCL means during interaction.
[14][15]
SCL
SCL
2 03 b SCL
SCL
[16]
( SCL
SCL SCL 3 ,(d) SCL
,
,,, SCL
,
SCL

3.3 SCL
SCL
SCL 6
SCL Kolmogorov-Smirnov
0.05 SCL
Wilcoxon 7
0.05ac SCL
cb SCL
cd SCL
0.10ad SCL

SCL SCL

0.10ab SCL
bd SCL
b
ad SCL

1
SCL 2
SCL
SCL
3
SCL

SCL

[6][J]200997-16
1 a b
c d

2 SCL
3 SCL SCLS
1

A a b d
c
B b c a
d
C c d b
a
D d a c
b
2

a 24 0.50 0.66 0.00 2.00
b 24 1.42 0.93 0.00 3.00
c 24 0.50 0.66 0.00 2.00
d 24 3.42 0.65 2.00 4.00
3 Wilcoxon
Z P-
avs.b -3.21 0.001*
avs.c 0.00 1.000
avs.d -4.37 0.000*
bvs.c -3.09 0.002*
bvs.d -4.26 0.000*
cvs.d -4.33 0.000*
*p<0.05
4 SCL
Kolmogorov-Smirnov P-
Z
a 0.504 0.962
b 0.525 0.946
c 0.643 0.803
d 0.584 0.885
5 SCL t
95% t P-

avs.b 0.19 1.39 [-0.48,0.86] 0.583 0.567
avs.c 0.24 1.31 [-0.61,0.66] 0.079 0.938
avs.d 0.05 0.84 [-0.35,0.25] 0.256 0.801
bvs.c -0.16 0.83 [-0.56,0.24] -0.855 0.404
bvs.d -0.14 1.25 [-0.74,0.46] -0.479 0.638
cvs.d 0.03 0.96 [-0.44,0.49] 0.115 0.910
t 18
6 SCL

a 19 0.022 0.037 0.004 0.169
b 19 0.012 0.008 0.003 0.033
c 19 0.015 0.007 0.005 0.031
d 19 0.012 0.006 0.004 0.025

7 SCL Wilcoxon
Z P-
avs.b -0.362 0.717
avs.c -0.241 0.809
avs.d -1.851 0.064+
bvs.c -2.012 0.044*
bvs.d -0.885 0.376
cvs.d -2.978 0.003*
* p<0.05+ p<0.10