Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Expansionism in America during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century shared
many similarities and differences to that of previous American expansionist ideals. In both cases
of American expansionism, the Americans believed that we must expand our borders in order to
keep the country running upright. Also, the Americans believed that the United States was the
strongest of nations, and that they could take any land they pleased. This is shown in the
"manifest destiny" of the 1840's and the "Darwinism" of the late 1800's and early 1900's. Apart
from the similarities, there were also several differences that included the American attempt to
stretch their empire across the seas and into other parts of the world. The views compared and
contrasted of the United States overseas expansion in the late 19th and 20th century were seen as a
Throughout history, the United States had come off as a stubborn nation that would take
what they wanted at any cost. This was prevalent in both cases of expansion as the Americans
risked war and national safety for the sake of gaining land, or even merely for proving a point.
During the early years of expansion, the Americans had pushed aside the Native Americans and
whoever else inhabited the land they wanted. They believed that the land was rightfully theirs
and that everyone else was merely encroaching on their land. This idea was continued into the
early twentieth century as the Americans looked to the oceans for new territories to their
kingdom. This idea is greatly exemplified in document 2, in which Senator Albert J. Beveridge
delivers a speech to Congress, saying that, "...and thanksgiving to Almighty God that He has
marked us as His chosen people, henceforth to lead in the regeneration of the world..."
In contrary to America's earlier beliefs, however, the race for expansion became more of
a global competition than that of controlling the surrounding lands. Other countries were quickly
scooping the remaining uncontrolled territories up, and America felt that they needed to stake
their clam in imperialism around the world. According to Carl Schurz, an advocate against
oversea expansion, states We earnestly condemn the policy of the present national
administration in the Philippines. It seeks to extinguish the spirit of 1776 in those islands. This
saying that what right does America have to go and colonize a small island nation. He compares
it to the idea that America was once oppressed by Britain and how they revolted against them.
The argument of Manifest Destiny by the United States in the Philippines was challenged
by William Jennings Bryan through his speech Imperialism (Flags of an Empire). America was
obsessed with the Philippines as it was a good spot for further colonization in China. Most
Americans believed it was good to control this location as it was a great economic opportunity.
Also, the Philippine war was taking place and trade with Asia could support that. Jennings goes
on to talk about how the Filipinos do not need any encouragement from Americans now living.
This was to promote the idea that we dont need to be influencing other countries. He pointed
out the hypocrisy of American interventionism and argued that republican ideals could never
coincide with the policies of imperial colonialism. He used the language of the revolution to
American war was a conflict between America and Spain in 1898 effectively due to the
intervention of US in the ongoing Cuban War of Independence. United States was attacked
Pacific possessions of Spain led to the involvement in the case of Philippine Revolution as well
as to Philippine- American war. The public opinion of America was grown at reports of Spanish
Atrocities in Cuba. United States tariff had put restrictions on sugar imports to America and
severely hurt the economy of Cuba that was dependent on the producing and selling sugar.
The early twentieth century proclaimed an era of American expansionism that broke with
past principles in its pursuit of economic and political interests, while it maintained cultural and
social incentives of past continental expansion. As the United States began to acquire a colonial
empire however, it became apparent that the allegedly noble social motives of Manifest Destiny
and the spread of liberty merely served to justify the true secular intentions beneath imperialism:
a desire for commercial gain and international power. It was ultimately a pursuit of these self-
serving interests that fueled American imperialism and catapulted the nation to a position of
dominance.