Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name:
Professor:
Course:
Date:
Literary feminism assumes a set of thoughts and ideals that allude to feminism in the realms of
literature. As such, literature that has assumed a feminist angle seems to suggest and even assign
certain roles within the literature settings and society based on their feminine characteristics and
other related perceptions. Therefore, women would only be deemed fit for certain roles both in
the society and setting within the literature. This paper intends to explore two Flannery
OConnor stories; Good Country People and A Good Man is Hard to Find from the
perspective of literary feminism theories as well as investigate ethical and faith-based aspects
related to them.
Modern literary feminism assumes two major theoretical build-ups. The first is called
essentialism, and it means that certain figures and characters in the literature are assigned
distinctly biased characteristics and roles based on what the society assigns to them as ideal. The
author summarizes the issue by stating that what is essential according to certain figures in
society is what literature assigns the characters (Dooling 71). For example, women are ideally
assigned nurture-related roles based on the societys assumption that that is their essential role in
society and life. The second theoretical build-up that will inform our use of literary feminism in
this paper is social constructivism theory. This theoretical build-up assigns characters and roles
in literature based on the socially constructed perceptions (Duvall 104). Therefore, in a feminist
Surname 2
setting, a woman might be assigned the role of single mother even when there are better and
Looking at OConnors story using the lens of literary feminism, we find several examples that
satisfy both theoretical build-ups as introduced before. First, essentialist feminist literature
manifests itself in the form of the authors introduction of the grandmother. Getz reflects how the
story makes reference to her as only the grandmother alludes to some feminist bias in that
while she has a name, the author assumes that her title would suffice (82). Therefore, Flannery
OConnor exemplifies essentialist literary feminism in how he mentions the familys matriarch
as just the grandmother. He assumes that making reference to her title would suffice in
introducing her to the story while her roles in the same are major.
Further along OConnors story, we find that once the road trip kicks off, the family finds
themselves having to make a stop at an eatery. While indulging themselves in the food, they
converse with the owner, a man called Red Sammy and his wife. How OConnor makes
reference to the restaurants owners wife as just the wife is a function of the socially
constructed roles that owners of various establishments relate to their wives. In that setting, the
wives are meant to support their husbands from a secondary place where they do not steal the
limelight. This exemplifies socialist constructivist literary feminism perfectly as one cannot
imagine this woman in any other light other than that of the humble, supportive wife whose role
is to stand by her husband (Getz 82). Such portrayals are a good example of modern literary
feminism as one could not even know that the lady might be solely responsible for the
establishment but feminist attitudes could never allow her get into the limelight.
Surname 3
After resuming their road trip meant to take them from Georgia to Florida, the familys
grandmother has a sudden memory of a certain plantation she knows. How OConnor represents
the scenes as they unfold where the old lady suddenly realized that the plantation is actually in
Tennessee represents some strong literary feminism traits. Paxton states how by portraying her
as a senile old lady who cannot even remember the exact location of a plantation (90) OConnor
exemplifies essentialist and social constructivist literary feminist characteristics. First, the author
representing the familys grandmother as senile and one who seems to have problems
family members and their older grandparents seem to conclude that all memory-related issues
Further looks into the scene depicting the familys grandmother forgetting that the
plantations she wanted to show the family was actually in Tennessee allude to socialist
constructivism literary feminism. The majority of society has grown to associate memory issues
with their grandmothers, which explains the reason OConnor might have decided to use the
After realizing that the plantation is not where the family car is headed, the grandmother
lets her cat out of its enclosure leading to an accident after it distracts the driving father. After the
car crashes into a ditch, with no injuries, OConnor uses another example of essentialist literary
feminism in the form of June Star lamenting to her father for the accident (O'Connor 130). As
the sister, she is portrayed as the one always lamenting and complaining even after it is evident
that the slight accident has left no injuries or deaths. OConnor has used her to define the
essential image that society has of sisters in the family; complainers and loudmouths who lament
about anything and everything. Eventually, as the family seeks help in extracting their stuck car,
Surname 4
the very man that their grandmother has been talking about the Misfit shows up with his gang
of criminals.
OConnors final scenes in this story portray several instances of both essentialism
literary feminism and socialist constructivist literary feminism. First, when the grandmother
recognizes the criminal, she begins a campaign to beseech him portraying him as the self-
appointed savior of her family. OConnor demonstrates how in most scenarios that depict a
matriarch, she has to stand up to potential harm which is literary feminism in the sense that the
family has a man who should stand up to protect both his mother and family (131). The last
instance of literary feminism in the story depicts Misfit and his gang killing the family. They
decidedly shoot the old women last even as she beseeches them to consider turning their lives
around. Their actions are another demonstration by OConnor of socialist constructivist literary
feminism since they assume she is the weakest, therefore, might deserve the last death. Even the
To be both a misfit and a good man is a contradiction in terms for the grandmother, who has
never considered the possibility of a social order in which one might be ethically required to
deviate from the norm. The latent injustice such conditions bring to bear on the poor and
marginalized has been incorporated, whether real or perceived, into The Misfits very identity.
His name itself reflects his conviction that he lives in precisely that environment. As he explains
to the grandmother, I call myself The Misfitbecause I cannot make what all I done wrong fit
what all I gone through in punishment (OConnor 132). In choosing that name for himself, The
Misfit openly challenges the grandmothers faith in her community. This aspect of her faith
manifests itself again when she assures The Misfit, You could be honest too if youd only try
(OConnor 132). Perhaps her most optimistic assertion, it completely disregards whatever
Surname 5
constraints The Misfit professes to be struggling under in favor of an exquisitely simple reward
system, in which the effort one puts into living well translates directly into a moral way of life.
Were The Misfit to follow her advice, he would soon find himself imprisoned for his past
offenses, and he knows it. As such, he and the grandmother remain at an impasse on this as on
other issues, the former zealously denying the latters equally impassioned affirmations.
Although the pairs explicit disagreements spring up primarily around social justice,
Christianity affords the grandmother and The Misfit a subsidiary front across which to do battle.
The grandmother begins on a typically hopeful note: If you would pray,Jesus would help
you(OConnor 131). In response to The Misfits refusal, she tries to say Jesus will help
you,an even stronger expression of faith, but all that comes out is Jesus, Jesus,as if she
might be cursing (pg 131). Her garbled words meet with more success than her intended would:
The disastrous road trip recounted in Flannery OConnors A Good Man Is Hard to Findends
in tragedy largely because of the grandmothers childlike lack of self-restraint, but her familys
demise does vindicate her initial resistance to their destination, one of the many questionable
stances she takes that OConnor defends at least partially throughout the narrative.
With regards to faith-based stances, the most far-reaching of these may be her absolute
faith in the natural order (O'Connor and McGee 128). Over the course of their climactic
dialogue, the grandmother and The Misfit address a wide range of variations on that theme, with
The Misfit ably representing the skeptic point of view. As their subject wanders from universals
(social justice and religion) to extreme particulars (each other and themselves), both characters
draw between the doctrines one deliberately subscribes to and the automatic reactions with
Furthermore, he places greater importance on the Gospels historical accuracy than on its
moral wisdom. He even goes so far as to say, It is not right, I was not there [when Jesus raised
the dead] because if I had of been there I would of known (pg.132). The Misfits grievance lies
not with the spiritual awakening he would have experienced had he been present, but instead
with the baser confirmation he desires as to Jesustrue divinity. Were The Misfit to practice
Christianity, in other words, faith would be allowed no part in it. The kind of certainty without
knowledge enjoyed by the grandmother is as foreign to him as are his doubts to her are.
Yes I am,The Misfit said as if he agreed (pg.131). He has yet to state it outright, but
OConnor leaves no doubt as to The Misfits attitude toward Jesus. Even after the grandmother
has jettisoned The Misfits control over the matter and promised Jesus help regardless of prayer
or lack thereof, The Misfit prefers to curse Jesus than turn to him for guidance. He eventually
puts his distaste into words: If He did what He said, then its nothing for you to do but throw
away everything and follow Him, and if He didnt, then its nothing for you to do but enjoy the
few minutes you got left the best way you can(OConnor 132). To throw away everything
(O'Connor 133) is an acrid enough definition of religious faith to have sufficed on its own; taken
as a whole, the statement ferociously repudiates the grandmothers beliefs. The Misfit reduces
piety to a blind acceptance of specific miraculous events. He posits that, said acceptance reached,
sincere Christians cannot help but devote themselves to Jesus teachings, convinced as they are
The first instance of literary feminism in OConnors second story is Mrs. Hopewells act of
gossiping in the kitchen after putting on the heaters. She gossips with her employee Mrs.
Surname 7
Freeman. As the employer, she assumes the socially constructed role of gossiper while her
employee listens on carefully. This portrayal is the product of the social belief that female
employers go the kitchen to catch up on gossip with their employees, which is a strong literary
feminist trait.
Further along the story, OConnor introduces the reader to the Mrs. Freemans two
daughters. He states how one is married and pregnant while the other is not. This difference
alludes to some socialist constructivist literary feminism where some daughters are lucky enough
to find life partners while the rest languish in solitude. This demonstration by OConnor is a
common aspect of literary feminism where society is perceived as being choosy in deciding who
Eventually, Flannery OConnor also makes mention of Joy, who is Mrs. Hopewells sick
daughter. The fact that she lost her leg in a shooting accident almost screams literary feminism as
women are perceived to be useless with regards to guns. This form of literary feminism is
essentialism-based where the essential roles that govern female roles in society depart them in
many cases from all use of guns. Additionally, she has a wooden peg that predisposes her to
Manleys sexual advances. He thinks that the beautiful girl with a wooden leg is more prone to
his advances than most others especially in instances where he takes the leg from her.
We meet several versions of this character throughout O'Connor's stories, but Hulga is perhaps
the most memorable, with her PhD in philosophy, her defiant atheism, her wooden leg, and her
weak heart that keeps her living at home. In some ways she's a bit like O'Connor herself, who
because of her failing health returned to life with her devoted but not literarily sensitive mother
on the family farm in Milledgeville, Georgia. This story is anything but a railing against Mrs.
Freeman and Mrs. Hopewell, unseeing as they are. It's Hulga who most clearly needs and
Surname 8
experiences the moment of seeing, given to her in the most painful (for her) and bizarre (for the
reader) way.
The majority of the story takes place before the moment of seeing, building up to it. In
the process we don't experience any one perspective so much as the juxtaposition of Hulga's with
the others'. What defines Hulga is her violent contempt for the world of her mother and her
mother's hired help. Hulga (who changed her given name, Joy) considers herself released from
religious delusions and inhabiting a more intellectual world, in which her eyes have been opened
to the philosophy of nihilism and from which she looks with scorn on good country people.
What precipitates the story's climactic moment is the arrival of Manley Pointer, the Bible
salesman with black suitcase, bright blue suit, and yellow socks, perfectly playing the part of
Many critics take Hulga's plot to seduce Manley as a desire to emancipate this young
believer from his religious delusions. Indeed, she envisions herself as his liberator. I have always
seen in Hulga a suppressed desire to connect with true faith like that of a childfor she is utterly
taken in by the young man's earnest show. She is drawn to him. Perhaps both desires are at work,
on different levels.
Works Cited
Getz, L. M. Flannery O'Connor, literary theologian: The habits and discipline of being. E.
Madsen, D. L. Feminist theory and literary practice. Pluto Press, 2000, p. 56.
O'Connor, F. A good man is hard to find, and other stories. Harcourt, Brace, 1953, pp. 130-
133.
---. A good man is hard to find, and other stories. Harcourt, Brace, 1955, pp. 131-133.
O'Connor, F., and R. M. Magee. Conversations with Flannery O'Connor. University Press of
Paxton, V. A. A good woman is hard to find: Discovering the voice of the woman satirist in