Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pamela Jones, Melissa Lavoie, Jenny Lee, Chris Quarrie, Stephen Sweet
Authors Note
All authors are students in the course
ETEC565A - 66B Learning Technologies: Selection, Design and Application
University of British Columbia
Instructor: Tatiana Bourlova
MOODLE IN AN INTERNATIONAL SECONDARY SCHOOL 2
have the challenging task of deciding which technologies to adopt. Primary characteristics that
emphasize the pedagogical aspects of a technology need to be considered. Who are the learners,
and what is the best tool to facilitate learning? From accessibility to feedback and data analysis,
what do teachers need to best help their students? In addition, secondary characteristics like cost,
infrastructure and support need to be factored into the decision (Nel, Dreyer & Carstens, 2010).
The organization we have chosen to investigate is a high school (Grades 9-12) that has a
BYOL (bring your own laptop) policy on campus. Many schools are adopting BYOD initiatives,
as this allows cost savings to schools and families and allows students to use a device that they
are already familiar with. Our chosen school is an international school attended by expatriate
families who have access to technologies at home and can afford to purchase their own device
for the school. Where this is not possible, the school provides laptops that students can sign out
and use. Many students will have more than one device, one being a laptop, the other a
smartphone or tablet.
The school uses a blended learning environment, meaning face-to-face interactions are
supported by technology that can allow for asynchronous communication. We are interested in a
platform that offers students and teachers the ability to collaborate, access resources,
communicate, and journal asynchronously. We need an LMS that offers a suitable and reliable
interface for multiple operating systems and devices, and is straightforward for both teachers and
students to use and troubleshoot. Additionally, with widespread smartphone and tablet use,
having an LMS that is available by way of a mobile app allows for multiple modes of
accessibility.
MOODLE IN AN INTERNATIONAL SECONDARY SCHOOL 3
landscape of other Web 2.0 tools will highlight its usefulness as an LMS at an international
secondary school. A short literature review explores what might identify an LMS as being
Literature Review
tools that ideally affords participants synchronous and asynchronous opportunities to:
explore relevant analytics to assess learning and course effectiveness and to (Coates,
provide a system for academic administration (Coates, James, & Baldwin, 2005; Porto
n.d.)
LMSs can be used in a variety of ways that reflect a continuum of integration with
teaching and learning. LMS usage in K-12 institutions has been shown to improve critical
thinking and writing skills: The process of text-based online discussion in the forum had the
potential to enhance the students writing skills, encourage their critical thinking, and help them
write more systematically (Wichadee, 2014). AKM and Azad (2015) note that at the most basic
level, LMSs can supplement a face-to-face course environment, can support a blended learning
environment or can provide distance education for online courses (p. 109). De Smet,
Bourgonjon, De Wever, Schellens and Valcke (2012) support this continuum further by noting
MOODLE IN AN INTERNATIONAL SECONDARY SCHOOL 4
that the informational use of an LMS is found to be a precursor, or necessary building block, for
the communicational use of an LMS (p.694). As such, an instructor would typically master the
skills necessary to transmit content prior to building opportunities for student discussion and
collaboration. Simply put, a teacher would need to learn incrementally how to access and
implement the affordances of an LMS. Schoonenboom (2014) further investigated why some
LMS tools are targeted by educators for adoption more than others. She generalized four
instructor profiles that demonstrate increasingly complex use of an LMS for instruction.
Although these profiles can be identified (in increasing complexity) as undertaking information
p.253) these are not the only factors that identify the degree to which an instructor will maximize
the options within an LMS. Schoonenboom also highlights the importance of identifying the
instructional relevance of the various tool, task and interface combinations. Lonn and Teasley
(2009) explore student and instructor use of LMSs for both efficient communication and
innovation in learning. Seemingly, instructors and students value tools and activities for
efficient communication more than interactive tools for innovating existing practices (Lonn &
Montgomerie, Reju & Schmoller, 2014). Each classification has a variety of advantages and
underlying code (and thus the application itself), availability of technical support, security and
privacy settings, licensing agreements, and platform familiarity. (Wright, Lopes, Montgomerie,
different tools, affordances, characteristics and constraints can make selecting the best possible
LMS a challenge that requires a team of individuals to work through a lengthy process of
research, debate, and selection. Building on a construct known as the Technology Acceptance
Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989, in De Smet et al, 2012) to predict LMS acceptance, De Smet et al
(2012) identified that perceived ease of use (of the LMS), perceived usefulness (of the LMS),
and subjective norm (the opinions of others) were found to have a strong effect on the
While many criteria in several different frameworks have been created to assess the
efficacy of an LMS, the most prominent indicator of success is continued use. Naveh, Tubin, and
Pliskin (2010) identify student use and student satisfaction with an LMS to be the main
indicators of the success of an LMS and the researchers encourage instructors to post rich
content on course websites to maintain and enhance student engagement (p. 133.)
On the whole, both students and instructors perceptions of perceived ease of use,
perceived usefulness, subjective norm and overall satisfaction seem to dictate whether an LMS
can be considered effective. As always, with all things technology-related, the specific context
for each different LMS implementation will dictate different relevant criteria.
Moodle
Usability
Moodle is our chosen LMS due to its flexibility, and its open-source philosophy: In
contrast to Blackboard, which has licensing payments for its proprietary software, Moodle is an
open source LMS which means that it is free and available for download without license
system (CMS) used by educators rather than as a LMS for training and human resource
management applications (Lawler, 2011). This makes Moodle better suited to educational
environments and course delivery. Lawler found a contributing factor to Moodles success in
schools was in its implementation. Moodle focuses on the needs of the users: teachers and
students. It has teachers, students and educators in mind as its priority, making it ideal in a high
An online LMS allows flexibility for students. While significant learning happens during
collaborative class activities, in an international setting, families are often transient and can be
absent for a period of time. Using an LMS such as Moodle means that students can keep up to
date with their studies while away and arrive back to class without significant learning gaps.
There are also more variables that affect schools in an international setting. The LMS would
become the primary learning platform in the event of a natural disaster or civil unrest that closes
the school and would mean that students would still be able to learn and continue their education.
In an international school, teacher turnover can be significant. One study puts teacher
turnover rates at approximately 14.4% per year in international schools (Henley, 2006). Many
teachers enjoy the opportunity to see different parts of the world and only stay a few years in any
one location. For these teachers, having the ability to access their resources in a virtual suitcase
is advantageous, and even a necessity. Moodle allows the export of resources and pages for
import into a new school system later, provided the new school also uses Moodle.
The ability to control release dates (stagger the access of particular resources,
assignments, drop-boxes, files, etc) makes pre-organizing a course easier for teachers. Students
can access the materials when they are meant to, which will ease anxiety. Students can also
access course calendars to plan ahead for due dates (assignments, tests, etc). These calendars can
MOODLE IN AN INTERNATIONAL SECONDARY SCHOOL 7
be external, such as Google Calendar, but Moodle also supports a native calendar. When students
open Moodle all assignments are shown for all teachers who post on the calendar. Grouping by
classes is an advantage as well. This can be done at any grade level. This makes it easy to
organize units of study and to link related resources and websites. Events can be added to a
calendar so that all or students in the course can see, or only students in a particular group can
see the event. In that way, students only see homework or upcoming events relevant to them.
Students can write journals online, and will find links to collaborative online documents
such as Google Docs and Google Drawings. There are Dropboxes for assignments, so students
The website is closed and only available to students in the course so privacy is not an
issue. Students are able to give feedback to teachers through the forums, and ask questions on
discussion forums so that others who may share their thoughts/concerns/questions can see the
questions and answers being asked by others in the course. Links to various course documents
(class PowerPoints, Ministry documents, online textbooks, Google documents with vocabulary,
links to online animations that many schools have access to, such as BrainPOP) can be provided
in one centralized location. Students need to only bookmark one site, and can access all course
materials from one place, which supports student organization. Units of study are broken down
into sections on the Moodle site so it is clearly organized. Lab documents for science classes can
be accessed from one page. Having course materials online saves paper and cuts printing costs.
Quizzes can also be created within Moodle, and can utilize both closed- and open-ended
responses, and multiple-choice questions can provide automated marking. The data can be kept
Analytics
Long and Siemens (2011) define Learning Analytics (LA) as the use of intelligent data,
learner-produced data, and analysis models to discover information and social connections, and
to predict and advise on learning. This, in theory, will help teachers to deliver differentiated
instruction based on the evaluation of this data. Moodle has developed a Learning Analytics
Enriched Rubric (LAe-R) tool as a plugin, which is available on versions 2.2 and above in order
when learning within a virtual learning environment (VLE). For example, when assessing
students performance with regards to collaboration, the tool analyzes and visualizes data such
as forum posts (new or reply messages), chat messages and number of files attached to forum
post messages. This plugin allows the teacher to assess students based on the criterion he/she
chooses, and provides quantitative, as well as qualitative, data. In usability tests, the LAe-R
scored very well, and despite the fact that it is an advanced assessment tool with a large amount
Accessibility
The IMS Accessibility SIG defines accessibility as the ability of the learning
environment to adjust to the needs of all learners (IMS Global Learning Consortium, 2002).
According to Cooper, Colwell and Jelfs (2007), steady progress is being made on making
Moodle more accessible, although there still are accessibility issues. Based on said criticisms,
developers continue to strive for a solution that will work best with Moodle, and provide an
optimal reading experience for students with learning disabilities. Moodle has even started an
online collaboration community to improve the accessibility/usability of its system, which can be
MOODLE IN AN INTERNATIONAL SECONDARY SCHOOL 9
Desktop Access (open-source screen reader), and Jaws are both compatible with the Windows 8
operating system, and are supported by both Internet Explorer and Firefox browsers when used
within Moodle.
Moodle also strives to make its system truly accessible to all by offering over 100
language packs to learners. The online discussion forums currently support over 25 languages.
The administrator of the site will be able to install the desired language from Site Administration
When evaluating Moodle from a financial standpoint and keeping to the constraints of
school budgets, should the schoolboard host Moodle on its own, there would be no costs to
upgrade from one version to the next. If there are more than 500 active users, then the school
board would simply need to upgrade the amount of RAM installed on the server. There is also no
limit as to the number of accounts a school board can hold. If a school board self-hosts, this will
also alleviate concerns about student data security. The overall concern of student data sitting
within a hosted solution always exists as the school board has no control over the host and who
has access to it. If the school board hosts internally, they can control access to student data and
backups.
More than 40 million users around the world use Google Apps for Education, and
Moodle has worked in collaboration with Google to leverage this user base and to build in
integration. It now provides the potential for automatic login to Google Apps when a student logs
in to Moodle, and it prompts a single sign-on for learners from Moodle to Google. This is
important for navigation purposes, and increases the efficiency and eases frustration levels of
Summary
Some in the industry predict the continuing evolution and even demise of the current
learning management systems as we know it today. Porto (2014) describes how social media and
other online tools have evolved to offer better communication, productivity, and collaboration
for online learning. No longer are tools contained in the LMS, but,
current trends in the LMS landscape include: expansion to mobile platforms; connection
with existing social networks and information streams; tools for course development;
diagnostics and adaptive learning systems based on learning analytics; and personalized
The trend in e-learning is now less about the tools available within traditional LMS
platforms but increasingly about the personalization of learning. As outlined in this report,
Moodle is accessible, customizable and integrates with other online tools useful for learning,
such as course calendars, quizzes, and Google apps. Williams (2015) describes how, by
adjusting the pace of instruction, leveraging student interests, letting learners to choose their own
learning path and adjusting content presentation by choosing text, images or videos, instructors
will be able to deliver their coursework in more efficient ways. As an open-source learning
platform, Moodle maximizes the instructors freedom in creating their course as they choose.
Moodle fits well with our international schools current practice of allowing students to
bring their laptops and goals of integrating technology effectively into classroom instruction. It is
a platform that enables students and teachers alike to collaborate, communicate, and access
resources more effectively. As well, students are able to access resources easily in one location
outside of school. Parents who are interested in their childs progress can also monitor from
home as well as seeing what homework is posted. As smartphones become more sophisticated,
MOODLE IN AN INTERNATIONAL SECONDARY SCHOOL 11
mobile apps are also becoming popular. Moodles mobile application Moodle Mobile is
available for both Android and iOS. Though it does have room to improve, its mobile platform is
being updated continually, and will provide even more flexibility to its users who want to access
administrators, teachers, students, and parents - Moodle has proven it does this well because it
focuses on the needs of the users (Lawler, 2011), flexible for teachers to design it as they see
\
MOODLE IN AN INTERNATIONAL SECONDARY SCHOOL 12
References
AKM, N. I., & Azad, N. (2015). Satisfaction and continuance with a learning management
system. Int Jnl of Info and Learning Tech, 32(2), 109-123. doi:10.1108/IJILT-09-2014-
0020
Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning
management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and
Management, 11(1), 19-36. doi:10.1080/13583883.2005.9967137
Cooper, M., Colwell C., & Jelfs, A. (2007). Embedding accessibility and usability:
considerations for e-learning research and development projects. Research in Learning
Technology, 15 (3), 893-896.
Dimopoulos, I., Petropoulou, O., Boloudakis, M., & Retalis, S. (2013). Using Learning Analytics
in Moodle for assessing students performance. In 2nd Moodle Research Conference.
Henley, J. (2006). ECIS annual statistical survey 2006: Data summary. Petersfield: European
Council of International Schools and Council of International Schools.
Langtree, I. (2014, August 6). List of Computer Screen Readers for Visually Impaired. Retrieved
from http://www.disabled-world.com/assistivedevices/computer/screen-readers.php
Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions
and uses of learning management systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 686-694.
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.008
Luck, J., Jones, D., McConachie, J. & Danaher, P. (2004). Challenging enterprises and
subcultures: Interrogating 'best practice' in Central Queensland University's course
management systems. Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development,
1(2), 19-31. Retrieved from http://sleid.cqu.edu.au/viewarticle.php?id=33
Naveh, G., Tubin, D., & Pliskin, N. (2010). Student LMS use and satisfaction in academic
institutions: The organizational perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3),
127-133. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.004
Nel, C., Dreyer, C., & Carstens, W. A.M. (2001). Educational technologies: A classification and
evaluation. Journal for Language Teaching, 35(4), 238-258.
Porto, S. (n.d.). The uncertain future of Learning Management Systems. Retrieved from
http://www.evolllution.com/opinions/uncertain-future-learning-management-systems/
Spiro, K. (2014, February 25). 5 elearning trends leading to the end of the Learning Management
Systems. Retrieved from http://elearningindustry.com/5-elearning-trends-leading-to-the-
end-of-the-learning-management-system
Wichadee, S. (2014). Students' learning behavior, motivation and critical thinking in learning
management systems. Journal of Educators Online, 11(3), 1-21.
Williams, Isabel. (2015, April 25). "7 Key eLearning Trends For 2016 - eLearning Industry."
2015. 3 Jun. 2015 <http://elearningindustry.com/7-key-elearning-trends-for-2016>
Wright, C.R., Lopes, V., Montgomerie, T.C., Reju, S.A., and Schmoller S. (21 April, 2014).
Selecting a Learning Management System: Advice from an Academic Perspective.
Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/selecting-learning-management-
system-advice-academic-perspective